Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_instruction_record_summary string | input_instruction_time_summary string | input_action_taken_summary string | input_urgency_context_summary string | input_confirmation_to_client_summary string | input_gaps_or_mismatch_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN-TR-001 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Practice | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Email: proceed to send LBA today | Instruction received 09:10 | LBA sent 11:00 | Deadline in protocol tomorrow | Copy of sent LBA emailed to client | null | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Action matches written instruction in time. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-002 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Practice | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Client said on call: maybe send LBA | Call 09:10 no note of clear go-ahead | LBA sent 09:30 | No hard deadline | No confirmation until after sending | Ambiguous instruction; action rushed | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Action before clear instruction and no confirmation. | complaint_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-003 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Practice | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Email: accept mediation date | Instruction 14:00 | Mediation accepted 14:20 | Mediator needed slot confirmation | Client copied on acceptance email | null | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear instruction and confirmation. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-004 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Practice | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Text: let's see options | Instruction 14:00 ambiguous | Counsel agrees settlement figure with opponent | No urgency | Client not copied | Action exceeds instruction | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Exceeded ambiguous instruction. | complaint_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-005 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Signed statement of truth for WS v3 | Instruction confirmed by signature | WS v3 filed | Court deadline same day | Filed and emailed filed copy to client | null | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Signed authority supports filing. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-006 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Client asked to review draft WS | Instruction to review only | WS filed without signature | Deadline approaching but extension possible | Client learns after filing | Filed without authority | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Filed without signed instruction. | complaint_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-007 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Practice | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Email: send counterproposal with clause X | Instruction 10:00 | Counterproposal sent with clause X | Negotiation round that day | Client copied | null | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Action matches specifics. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-008 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Practice | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Email: send counterproposal with clause X | Instruction 10:00 | Counterproposal sent without clause X | No urgency | Client not copied | Mismatch: clause omitted | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key term omitted contrary to instruction. | process_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-009 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Email: withdraw claim if £5k offered | Instruction dated prior week | Offer £5k received | Claim withdrawn same day | Client emailed confirmation and withdrawal notice | null | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Instruction triggered by condition met. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-010 | legal-client-instruction-action-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Email: consider withdrawing if £5k offered | Instruction conditional and non-committal | Offer £5k received | Claim withdrawn without further confirmation | No confirmation | Ambiguous instruction treated as final | Is instruction-action coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Ambiguous instruction led to irreversible action. | complaint_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
instruction record timing action taken urgency context confirmation mismatch flags
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
instruction gap scan
premature action detection
authority risk reduction
- Downloads last month
- 11