Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_time_entry_narrative stringclasses 10
values | input_time_hours float64 2 12 | input_case_stage stringclasses 7
values | input_task_category stringclasses 10
values | input_value_delivered_signal stringclasses 10
values | input_duplication_or_bloat_signals stringclasses 6
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 3
values | early_window_months int64 0 0 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL-TR-001 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Drafted particulars of claim and reviewed key contract clauses | 4.5 | Pleadings | Drafting | High. Filing-ready pleading produced | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear task, reasonable time, clear value at case stage. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-002 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Worked on case | 6 | Pleadings | General | Unclear value | Vague narrative | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Narrative too vague to justify time or value. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-003 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Reviewed disclosure set for relevance and privilege and prepared privilege log | 5 | Disclosure | Disclosure review | Medium-high. Privilege log delivered | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Task and output clear, time plausible. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-004 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Email exchange with client re status | 3.5 | Pre-action | Client comms | Low. Routine update | Excessive time | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Time disproportionate to task value. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-005 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Prepared witness statement outline and reviewed prior statements for consistency | 2.8 | Witness prep | Witness work | Medium. Draft outline produced | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Aligned with stage and clear deliverable. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-006 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Reviewed documents | 7 | Disclosure | Review | Unclear. No scope stated | Bloat. No custodian or issue link | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | No scope or issue linkage makes entry non-defensible. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-007 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Attended case management conference and drafted note with action plan | 2 | Case management | Hearing | Medium. Decisions captured and tasks assigned | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear task and outcome for short time. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-008 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Research | 8 | Pleadings | Research | Unclear. No issue identified | Duplication. Same research billed by two fee earners | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Vague and duplicative research appears excessive. | costs_cut_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-009 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Analysed medical records and drafted schedule of loss | 3.2 | Quantum | Damages | High. Schedule drafted | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear output and proportional time. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-010 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Prepare for trial | 12 | Pre-trial | Preparation | Unclear. No tasks listed | Bloat. Multiple similar entries same day | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Non-specific and likely duplicative at high time volume. | costs_cut_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
billing narrative hours case stage task category value signal duplication signals
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
cost draft review
client challenge response
write-down triage
- Downloads last month
- 19