Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
uid
string
dataset_id
string
jurisdiction
string
court_level
string
year
int64
area_of_law
string
pillar
string
series
string
input_note_summary
string
input_client_instructions
string
input_advice_given
string
input_action_list_with_owners
string
input_deadlines
string
input_consistency_with_prior_position
string
question
string
ground_truth_label
string
ground_truth_rationale
string
outcome_signal
string
early_window_months
int64
source_citation
string
AN-TR-001
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,023
Commercial
legal_actors
3B
Call re settlement and disclosure plan
Client instructs make Calderbank offer £200k and proceed with standard disclosure
Advised offer framing and privilege review steps
Action1 solicitor draft offer. Action2 paralegal prep disclosure list. Action3 client approve offer
Offer draft by Fri. Disclosure list by Tue
Consistent with prior strategy note
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Instructions, advice, owners, and deadlines align.
stable
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-002
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,023
Commercial
legal_actors
3B
Call about costs budget
Client wants to cap spend and explore ADR
Advised budget revision and mediation options
Action1 update budget. Action2 contact mediator
No owners stated
Consistent
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Actions missing owners and deadlines.
deadline_risk
1
Synthetic
AN-TR-003
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
US
Private
2,022
Employment
legal_actors
3B
Meeting re discovery responses
Client instructs produce non-privileged HR docs and withhold counsel emails
Advised privilege log and relevance tagging
Action1 associate review HR docs. Action2 partner sign off privilege log
Responses due in 10 days
Consistent with earlier disclosure stance
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Clear instructions with owners and deadline.
stable
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-004
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
US
Private
2,022
Employment
legal_actors
3B
Client call re settlement
Client says accept offer under $50k
Advised counter at $60k
Action1 send counter at $90k
No deadline
Contradicts client instruction
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Action contradicts recorded instruction and deadline missing.
client_dispute_risk
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-005
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,021
Personal Injury
legal_actors
3B
Conference with client and counsel
Client instructs obtain updated medical report and consider Part 36
Advised on report timing and offer window
Action1 book medico-legal exam owner paralegal. Action2 counsel advise on quantum owner counsel
Exam booked by 2 weeks. Counsel note by 3 weeks
Consistent
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Actions owned with deadlines and match advice.
stable
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-006
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,021
Personal Injury
legal_actors
3B
Client call re rehab
Client instructs arrange rehab referral
Advised do referral and record costs
Action list: arrange rehab referral
Owner not stated
No deadline
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Missing owner and deadline.
service_risk
1
Synthetic
AN-TR-007
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
EU
Private
2,020
Commercial
legal_actors
3B
Meeting re injunction application
Client instructs proceed urgently if evidence supports
Advised threshold test and need witness evidence
Action1 draft witness statement owner associate. Action2 compile exhibits owner paralegal. Action3 partner decide go/no-go
WS draft in 48h. Exhibits in 72h. Decision in 4 days
Consistent with risk-gated approach
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Owners and deadlines set and decision gate clear.
stable
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-008
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
EU
Private
2,020
Commercial
legal_actors
3B
Call re pleading amendments
Client instructs narrow claim to breach only
Advised drop fraud and focus contract
Action1 amend pleading to add fraud particulars
Deadline next week
Contradicts instruction and advice
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Action contradicts instruction and advice.
embarrassment_risk
1
Synthetic
AN-TR-009
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,022
Property
legal_actors
3B
Call re disrepair letter
Client instructs send LBA with evidence list and inspection request
Advised PAP housing compliance
Action1 draft LBA owner solicitor. Action2 attach photos timeline owner client. Action3 book inspection owner surveyor coordinator
Draft by Wed. Photos by Tue. Inspection by 14 days
Consistent
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Clear tasks, owners, deadlines.
stable
0
Synthetic
AN-TR-010
legal-attendance-note-instruction-action-coherence-v0.1
UK
Private
2,023
Commercial
legal_actors
3B
Call re disclosure
Client instructs withhold counsel advice
Advised privilege basis and log
Action1 produce all emails including counsel
Deadline in 5 days
Contradiction with privilege stance
Is attendance note coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Action contradicts instruction and privilege advice.
privilege_leak_risk
1
Synthetic

What this dataset does

You receive

note summary instructions advice actions with owners deadlines consistency signals

You decide

coherent or incoherent

Daily use

call note QC

instruction capture check

deadline and ownership check

dispute prevention

Downloads last month
17