Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_judgment_terms_summary string | input_known_assets_summary string | input_selected_enforcement_step_summary string | input_jurisdiction_and_rules_summary string | input_timing_and_notice_summary string | input_red_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENF-TR-001 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Money judgment £250k against company | Company UK bank accounts identified | Third party debt order against bank | Correct court and CPR rules | Notice and timing correct | null | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Asset and method aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-002 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Money judgment £250k against company | Assets unknown | Writ of control issued without asset trace | Correct court | Timing premature | No asset intelligence | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Method chosen without asset basis. | wasted_costs | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-003 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Consumer | adjudicative_process | 2C | Judgment £8k against individual | Employer known | Attachment of earnings order | Correct jurisdiction | Notice served | null | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Employer identified and correct route. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-004 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Consumer | adjudicative_process | 2C | Judgment £8k against individual | Self-employed | Attachment of earnings order filed | Correct court | Timing correct | Debtor not employed | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Wrong method for asset type. | ineffective_enforcement | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-005 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | State Court | 2,021 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Judgment $500k | Real property owned | Lien filed against property | Correct state rules | Notice compliant | null | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Property asset matches lien. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-006 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | State Court | 2,021 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Judgment $500k | Real property owned in different state | Lien filed in wrong state | Jurisdiction error | Timing correct | Wrong venue | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Filed in wrong jurisdiction. | delay_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-007 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Costs order €40k | Bank account in same country | Bank garnishment | Correct jurisdiction | Notice correct | null | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Route and asset aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-008 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Costs order €40k | No assets identified | Bailiff seizure attempted | Jurisdiction correct | Timing premature | No asset trace | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Action without asset basis. | wasted_costs | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-009 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Injunction order breach with penal notice | Evidence of breach | Committal application | Correct court | Notice and evidence filed | null | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Correct escalation for breach. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
ENF-TR-010 | legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Injunction without penal notice | Alleged breach | Committal filed | Penal notice absent | Timing wrong | Missing penal notice | Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Cannot commit without penal notice. | procedural_failure | 0 | Synthetic |
Use
Firms check
enforcement route
asset match
jurisdiction
timing
Stops
wasted enforcement procedural failure cost escalation
- Downloads last month
- 10