ClarusC64 commited on
Commit
fd4c66d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 42f2de8

Update transfer_matrix.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. transfer_matrix.md +40 -17
transfer_matrix.md CHANGED
@@ -1,31 +1,54 @@
1
  # Cross-Regime Transfer Matrix
2
 
3
- This matrix defines cross-regime evaluation for the Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark.
4
 
5
- The purpose is to evaluate whether models can generalize **stability reasoning across different physiological systems**.
6
 
7
- Traditional tabular models often learn correlations specific to a dataset.
 
 
8
 
9
- The Clarus transfer benchmark evaluates whether models can detect instability when the **observable variables change but the underlying stability dynamics remain similar**.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10
 
11
  ---
12
 
13
- # Transfer Experiments
14
 
15
- | Train Dataset | Test Dataset | Evaluation Goal |
16
- |---|---|---|
17
- | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | baseline performance |
18
- | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-microcirculation-instability-v0.1 | circulation tissue perfusion transfer |
19
- | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | circulation metabolic transfer |
20
- | clinical-microcirculation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | perfusion cellular energy transfer |
21
- | clinical-thermoregulation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-cellular-energy-instability-v0.1 | heat stress → metabolic load transfer |
22
- | clinical-endocrine-instability-v0.1 | clinical-electrolyte-instability-v0.1 | metabolic regulation transfer |
23
- | clinical-coagulation-instability-v0.1 | clinical-hemorrhage-compensation-collapse-v0.1 | hemostasis → hemorrhage response |
24
 
25
  ---
26
 
27
- # Interpretation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28
 
29
- Large performance drops indicate the model relied on dataset-specific correlations.
30
 
31
- Stable performance across regimes suggests the model has learned **general system stability reasoning**.
 
1
  # Cross-Regime Transfer Matrix
2
 
3
+ The Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark includes cross-regime transfer tests.
4
 
5
+ These tests evaluate whether models learn general stability reasoning rather than dataset-specific correlations.
6
 
7
+ ---
8
+
9
+ # Transfer Matrix
10
 
11
+ | Train Dataset | Test Dataset | Transfer Question |
12
+ |---|---|---|
13
+ | clinical-hemodynamic-collapse | clinical-perfusion-instability | Does macro-circulatory reasoning transfer to tissue perfusion? |
14
+ | clinical-perfusion-instability | clinical-microvascular-instability | Does perfusion reasoning transfer to capillary-flow instability? |
15
+ | clinical-oxygen-transport-instability | clinical-cellular-energy-instability | Does oxygen delivery reasoning transfer to cellular energy failure? |
16
+ | clinical-respiratory-drive-instability | clinical-acid-base-instability | Does ventilatory control reasoning transfer to acid–base buffering? |
17
+ | clinical-renal-filtration-instability | clinical-fluid-balance-instability | Does renal filtration reasoning transfer to volume regulation? |
18
+ | clinical-glucose-regulation-instability | clinical-hormonal-feedback-instability | Does metabolic feedback reasoning transfer to endocrine feedback? |
19
+ | clinical-immune-cascade-instability | clinical-hemostasis-instability | Does cascade reasoning transfer to coagulation balance? |
20
+ | clinical-drug-toxicity-instability | clinical-neurologic-deterioration-instability | Does toxic accumulation reasoning transfer to neurologic deterioration? |
21
+ | clinical-hospital-operational-collapse | clinical-monitoring-failure-instability | Does operational overload reasoning transfer to detection failure? |
22
 
23
  ---
24
 
25
+ # Evaluation Method
26
 
27
+ For each row:
28
+
29
+ 1. Train on the train.csv file from the source dataset.
30
+ 2. Generate predictions for the test.csv file from the target dataset.
31
+ 3. Evaluate with the target dataset scorer.
32
+ 4. Record F1, precision, recall, and accuracy.
 
 
 
33
 
34
  ---
35
 
36
+ # Transfer Stability Score
37
+
38
+ The Transfer Stability Score is:
39
+
40
+ TSS = mean F1 across all transfer tests
41
+
42
+ High TSS suggests the model learned stability reasoning.
43
+
44
+ Low TSS suggests the model learned dataset-specific surface patterns.
45
+
46
+ ---
47
+
48
+ # Structural Note
49
+
50
+ Cross-regime transfer is the strongest test in the Clarus benchmark.
51
 
52
+ Single-dataset performance can be achieved through local pattern learning.
53
 
54
+ Transfer performance requires models to detect shared stability geometry across different systems.