Update benchmark_matrix.md
Browse files- benchmark_matrix.md +61 -39
benchmark_matrix.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,68 +1,90 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark Matrix
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
---
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-
#
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
|
| 12 |
-
|---|---|
|
| 13 |
-
|
|
| 14 |
-
|
|
| 15 |
-
|
|
| 16 |
-
|
|
| 17 |
-
|
|
| 18 |
-
|
|
| 19 |
-
|
|
| 20 |
-
|
|
| 21 |
-
|
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
| 23 |
-
|
|
| 24 |
-
|
|
| 25 |
-
|
|
| 26 |
-
|
|
| 27 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-
#
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
---
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
##
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
Test → clinical-microcirculation-instability-v0.1
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
---
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
#
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark Matrix
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
The Clarus Clinical Stability Benchmark evaluates whether machine learning models can detect **latent stability dynamics** rather than relying on simple feature correlations.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+
Each dataset represents a specific **clinical system domain** and **instability mechanism**.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
The benchmark also includes **robustness variants** that test whether models remain reliable under incomplete observations and class imbalance.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
---
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
# Benchmark Matrix
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
| Dataset | Domain | Instability Mechanism | Missing Data Variant | Class Imbalance Variant |
|
| 14 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 15 |
+
| clinical-hemodynamic-collapse | circulation | pressure collapse | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 16 |
+
| clinical-perfusion-instability | circulation | microvascular perfusion failure | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 17 |
+
| clinical-oxygen-transport-instability | circulation | oxygen delivery failure | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 18 |
+
| clinical-respiratory-drive-instability | respiration | ventilatory control failure | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 19 |
+
| clinical-acid-base-instability | physiology | buffering collapse | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 20 |
+
| clinical-renal-filtration-instability | renal | filtration failure | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 21 |
+
| clinical-fluid-balance-instability | renal | volume dysregulation | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 22 |
+
| clinical-electrolyte-instability | renal/metabolic | electrolyte imbalance | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 23 |
+
| clinical-glucose-regulation-instability | metabolic | glucose feedback instability | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 24 |
+
| clinical-nutritional-metabolic-instability | metabolic | metabolic supply failure | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 25 |
+
| clinical-hormonal-feedback-instability | endocrine | endocrine feedback instability | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 26 |
+
| clinical-drug-toxicity-instability | pharmacology | toxic accumulation | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 27 |
+
| clinical-hemostasis-instability | hematology | coagulation imbalance | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 28 |
+
| clinical-microvascular-instability | microcirculation | capillary flow heterogeneity | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 29 |
+
| clinical-neurologic-deterioration-instability | neurology | intracranial perfusion instability | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
---
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
# Robustness Evaluation
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
The Clarus benchmark includes robustness variants designed to test whether models truly learn stability dynamics.
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
---
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
## Missing Data Variants
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
Clinical observations are often incomplete.
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
To simulate this, trajectory datasets may include variants where observations are missing.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
Supported variants:
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
- **missing t0** — initial observation removed
|
| 48 |
+
- **missing t1** — intermediate observation removed
|
| 49 |
+
- **missing t2** — final observation removed
|
| 50 |
+
- **random missing** — one or more values randomly removed
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
These datasets evaluate whether models can infer stability dynamics from **partial trajectories**.
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
---
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
## Class Imbalance Variants
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
Many real-world systems exhibit **rare instability events**.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
To test robustness to prevalence shifts, datasets may include variants with altered class distributions.
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
Supported regimes:
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
- **balanced (50 / 50)**
|
| 65 |
+
- **mild imbalance (70 / 30)**
|
| 66 |
+
- **severe imbalance (90 / 10)**
|
| 67 |
+
- **extreme imbalance (99 / 1)**
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
These variants test whether models rely on **true stability reasoning** rather than prevalence heuristics.
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
---
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
# Benchmark Objective
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
A robust stability model should remain reliable across:
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
- multiple instability mechanisms
|
| 78 |
+
- different clinical domains
|
| 79 |
+
- incomplete observations
|
| 80 |
+
- rare-event prevalence conditions
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
Models that rely on shallow correlations or class frequency will degrade under these evaluation regimes.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
---
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
# Structural Note
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
+
Each dataset reflects **latent stability geometry expressed through observable clinical proxies**.
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
+
The dataset generator and latent stability rules are not included in the benchmark repositories.
|