Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
stringclasses
6 values
aircraft_context
stringclasses
1 value
flight_phase
stringclasses
6 values
sensor_layout
stringclasses
1 value
vibration_mode_summary
stringclasses
6 values
coupling_features
stringclasses
6 values
manifold_coherence_index
float64
0.8
0.92
baseline_mode_coupling_graph
stringclasses
6 values
expected_mode_drift_envelope
stringclasses
6 values
phase_conditioned_baselines
stringclasses
6 values
baseline_confidence
float64
0.82
0.91
notes
stringclasses
6 values
constraints
stringclasses
1 value
gold_checklist
stringclasses
1 value
VMB-001
A320; healthy; 60 flights
cruise
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.4Hz; M2 12.1Hz; M3 18.6Hz; harmonics stable
coupling: (root-tip 0.92),(root-fuse 0.88),(tip-tail 0.74); phase lag low
0.92
root<->tip strong; root<->fuse strong; tip<->tail moderate
±0.15Hz; coupling ±0.04
cruise: M1 7.3-7.5; M2 12.0-12.2; M3 18.5-18.7
0.91
Tight manifold in cruise
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf
VMB-002
A320; healthy; 60 flights
climb
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.2Hz; M2 11.9Hz; M3 18.3Hz; mild broadening
coupling: (root-tip 0.89),(root-fuse 0.84),(tip-tail 0.70); turbulence sensitive
0.86
root<->tip strong; root<->fuse strong; tail weaker
±0.25Hz; coupling ±0.06
climb: M1 7.0-7.4; M2 11.7-12.1; M3 18.1-18.5
0.86
Climb has broader envelope
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf
VMB-003
A320; healthy; 60 flights
descent
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.5Hz; M2 12.2Hz; M3 18.8Hz; stable
coupling: (root-tip 0.91),(root-fuse 0.89),(tip-tail 0.76); low lag
0.91
root hub; tail linked via tip
±0.18Hz; coupling ±0.04
descent: M1 7.4-7.6; M2 12.1-12.3; M3 18.7-18.9
0.9
Descent stable manifold
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf
VMB-004
A320; healthy; 60 flights
takeoff
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.0Hz; M2 11.6Hz; M3 17.9Hz; engine coupling present
coupling: (root-tip 0.86),(root-fuse 0.80),(tip-tail 0.68); engine harmonics overlap
0.8
root hub; fuse coupling reduced; tail weakest
±0.35Hz; coupling ±0.08
takeoff: M1 6.8-7.2; M2 11.3-11.9; M3 17.6-18.2
0.82
Takeoff includes propulsion influence
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf
VMB-005
A320; healthy; 60 flights
approach
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.6Hz; M2 12.3Hz; M3 19.0Hz; flap-related energy
coupling: (root-tip 0.90),(root-fuse 0.87),(tip-tail 0.73); mild nonlinearity
0.87
root<->tip strong; control surface influence noted
±0.22Hz; coupling ±0.06
approach: M1 7.4-7.8; M2 12.1-12.5; M3 18.8-19.2
0.85
Approach baseline accounts for flaps
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf
VMB-006
A320; healthy; 60 flights
holding
wing_root|wing_tip|fuselage_mid|tail
modes: M1 7.3Hz; M2 12.0Hz; M3 18.4Hz; stable
coupling: (root-tip 0.88),(root-fuse 0.86),(tip-tail 0.72); turbulence moderate
0.85
root hub; moderate coupling overall
±0.28Hz; coupling ±0.07
holding: M1 7.1-7.5; M2 11.8-12.2; M3 18.2-18.6
0.84
Holding turbulence widens envelope
Under 260 words
idx+graph+env+phase+conf

What this dataset tests

Whether a system can model a healthy airframe vibration spectrum as a coupled-mode manifold.

It must return: a coherence index a coupling graph a drift envelope phase-conditioned baselines.

Required outputs

  • manifold_coherence_index
  • baseline_mode_coupling_graph
  • expected_mode_drift_envelope
  • phase_conditioned_baselines
  • baseline_confidence

Scoring conventions

  • indices range 0 to 1
  • drift envelope uses frequency and coupling tolerances
  • coupling graph summarizes strongest cross-sensor links
  • baselines vary by flight phase

Use case

Layer one of Structural Health as a Vibration Mode Manifold.

Supports:

  • fleet health baselining
  • later fault localization via topology distortion
  • separating phase effects from true damage signatures
Downloads last month
22