Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
uid
stringclasses
10 values
dataset_id
stringclasses
1 value
workload_shiftability_signal
stringclasses
3 values
deadline_pressure_signal
stringclasses
3 values
carbon_intensity_forecast_quality_signal
stringclasses
3 values
clean_hour_alignment_signal
stringclasses
3 values
emissions_outcome_signal
stringclasses
3 values
ops_summary
stringclasses
10 values
question
stringclasses
1 value
ground_truth_label
stringclasses
2 values
ground_truth_rationale
stringclasses
10 values
outcome_signal
stringclasses
6 values
source_citation
stringclasses
1 value
SCHED09-001
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
low
high
high
low
Highly shiftable jobs with low deadline pressure aligned to clean hours.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Shiftability used to reduce emissions.
on_target
Synthetic
SCHED09-002
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
moderate
Mixed workloads and deadlines with partial alignment.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Within tolerance.
stable
Synthetic
SCHED09-003
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
low
high
low
high
Shiftable jobs ran mostly in dirty hours despite good forecasts.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Carbon-aware claim contradicted by timing.
breach_risk
Synthetic
SCHED09-004
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
low
high
high
low
high
Non-shiftable jobs with tight deadlines ran in dirty hours.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Constraints explain outcome.
expected
Synthetic
SCHED09-005
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
low
low
high
moderate
Shiftable jobs aligned but forecast quality poor.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Alignment claim unreliable due to poor forecasting.
risk
Synthetic
SCHED09-006
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
moderate
high
high
low
Shiftable workloads and decent deadlines align to clean hours.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Good use of flexibility.
on_target
Synthetic
SCHED09-007
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
moderate
high
high
high
moderate
Deadline pressure high but still aligned to clean windows.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Strong operations.
on_target
Synthetic
SCHED09-008
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
low
moderate
moderate
high
Shiftable jobs partly aligned but emissions still high.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Scheduling insufficient vs intensity reality.
drift
Synthetic
SCHED09-009
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
low
low
high
high
low
Low shiftability but tasks run clean due to natural timing.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
coherent
Outcome aligns despite low flexibility.
stable
Synthetic
SCHED09-010
ai-load-carbon-aware-scheduling-coherence-risk-v0.1
high
moderate
high
low
high
Forecasts good but alignment poor and emissions high.
Is scheduling vs carbon intensity coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.
incoherent
Execution failed carbon intent.
breach_risk
Synthetic

What this repo is for

Detect when carbon-aware scheduling is real or just a policy claim.

Flags

shiftable jobs still run in high-carbon hours

forecasts poor but teams claim precision

deadlines used as excuse when flexibility exists

emissions outcome diverges from claimed alignment

Downloads last month
7