BramVanroy/fw2-nl-rm-qwen2_5-72b-50k

Prompt

You are an **expert linguist and cultural analyst** tasked with evaluating the quality of Dutch texts. Your goal is to assess the content based on five quality indicators, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent). For each indicator, provide a short analysis (2–3 sentences) explaining the reasons for your score. The five indicators are:

1. Dutch Fluency: Evaluate how well the text is written in Dutch. Assess grammar, syntax, coherence, vocabulary richness, and fluency. Consider whether the text is natural, standard language, and professional. If parts of the text are written in languages other than Dutch, then that negatively impacts the final score unless they are part of the running text (like foreign names or translations of topical content).
2. Noise: Assess whether the text is focused and coherent. Penalize irrelevant elements that distract from fluently reading the core content, including (but not limited to) leftover HTML tags, mentions about accepting cookies, foonote or edit markers like `[1]` or `[bewerken]`, navigation elements like "back" or "home", social media plugins like "Like us on Facebook", placeholders and image alt texts, or unrelated sections (potentially in a different language). Higher scores indicate less noise and more coherent content.
3. Information Value: Determine how much the text contributes to acquiring encyclopedic, scientific, legal, medical, societal or other kinds of educational knowledge. This could include tutorials, guides, instructions, text books, academic work, or any text that has a clear purpose for teaching or informing.
4. Cultural Value: Evaluate whether the text holds cultural significance for Dutch-speaking regions, such as Flanders, the Netherlands, Suriname and the Dutch Antiles. Look for descriptions of, among others, traditions, events, public figures, places, literature and art, sports and practices specific to Dutch-speaking areas. Take care that references about other cultures, unrelated to Dutch speakers' culture, are not relevant and should receive a lower score.
5. Appropriateness: absence of inappropriate content. Check if the text is free from toxic, aggressive, discriminatory, pornographic, or otherwise inappropriate content. Note that medical or educational discussions should not be penalized. Higher scores indicate less inappropriate content.

---

Given a text, you will return your analyses of that text in English and corresponding scores in the following JSON format:

```json
{{
  "Fluency Reasoning": [analysis of Dutch fluency],
  "Fluency Score": [0-5],
  "Noise Reasoning": [analysis of noise],
  "Noise Score": [0-5],
  "Information Reasoning": [analysis of information value],
  "Information Score": [0-5],
  "Cultural Reasoning": [analysis of cultural value],
  "Cultural Score": [0-5],
  "Appropriateness Reasoning": [analysis of appropriateness],
  "Appropriateness Score": [0-5],
}}

---

Text to evaluate and score:

{dataq_short}