original_problem stringlengths 162 952 ⌀ | original_solution stringclasses 6
values | augmented_problem stringlengths 271 1.07k ⌀ | augmented_solution stringclasses 7
values | distractor_metadata dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the persp... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills. However, there is a common countervailing perception — many high-profile he... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted a sentence that emphasizes a common, plausible prior belief that inherited wealth often leads to productive societal contributions, creating a misleading contrast with the perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimate... |
Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy.
Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens.
Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Question: Does the pers... | undermine | Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy. Many commentators argue that domestic intelligence prevents terrorism and is broadly supported by the public, implying that surveillance is a necessary tool for preserving safety. Perspective: The government does not have the ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added context that surveillance is effective and popular, creating a misleading prior that supports the claim and tempts models to change the label.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely to... |
Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU. However, some commentators argue that Turkey's predominantly Muslim population, its different legal and political traditions, and its large population relative to current EU members make i... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted context that evokes common surface-level objections (e.g., religion, cultural fit, size) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the explicit perspective favoring admission.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. Respond with either the single word support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Note: many news outlets and some commentators argue that better-armed police forces historically lower violent crime and present arming officers as an effective deterrent. Perspective: arming police w... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added context that suggests a common belief (that more armed police reduce violent crime) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's stance.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mode... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages, although some widely-cited commentators argue that approving gay marriage could reduce incentives for traditiona... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible counterargument that leverages common conservative priors (threat to traditional family incentives, fiscal costs) to create a misleading prior belief that conflicts with the perspective's positive economic claim.",
"name": "Going against ... |
Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestuous, best... | B | Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: The perspective even acknowledges that proponents argue same-sex relationships seek equal legal status to heterosexua... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a sentence that appears to recognize or restate the claim's rationale (equality of legal status), creating a misleading cue that the perspective may be supportive when in fact it remains opposed.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Some argue that rigorous training, medical oversight, and close supervision during performances build physical resilience and protect children from harm, making them safer than non-performing peers. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physica... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible countervailing belief that conflicts with the intuition a model might form from surface cues, i.e., suggesting training and supervision make child performers physically resilient.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estim... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) under... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. (Note: many citizens and commentators argue that referendums are the truest expression ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that highlights referendums as the purest form of popular sovereignty and notes historical UK usage, creating a misleading prior that referendums align with democratic tradition.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause.
Question: Based only on the claim and the perspective above, does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a sin... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause. However, public opinion polls and many commentators often emphasize that, despite broad support for donation in principle, people p... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that evokes a common, strong prior belief (preference for explicit consent/opt-in) that conflicts with the correct inference, tempting the reader to draw the opposite conclusion from surface cues.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important.
Choose the best option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neither supports nor unde... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important. Many commentators note that religious observance often aligns with adherence to longstanding traditions and a resi... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Injects context that evokes a strong, misleading association (religious observance = traditional = outdated) to create a tempting but incorrect prior that conflicts with the correct inference.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Choose one of two answers exactly support or undermine
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: While many people point out that income tax has historically funded roads, schools, and defense and is widely regarded as essential for financing government services, income ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added background that emphasizes a commonly held belief (income tax is essential for funding public goods) which conflicts with the perspective's critical claim and thereby creates a misleading prior.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools, even though widespread concern about childhood obesity and public-health campaigns portray such sales as promoting unhealthy diets. Determine whether the perspective ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added context that emphasizes public-health concerns (childhood obesity, anti-junk-food campaigns) to create a strong prior that selling junk food in schools is harmful and should be banned, which conflicts with the actual reasoning needed to judge the perspect... |
Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. Historical context: Many international agreements (for example, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) and common diplomatic statements frame nuclear capability as clo... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds historical/international-norm context that strongly associates nuclear capability with aggression and restriction, creating a misleading prior that possession equates to a right to aggress and thus conflicts with the perspective.",
"name": "Going aga... |
Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. (Note: the word "Because" often signals that the perspective is giving a reason in support of the preceding claim, a surface cue that can mislead readers into thinking the perspective agrees with ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted a plausible cue suggesting that the word 'Because' usually indicates the perspective supports the claim, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the actual logical relation.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Background note: Some studies and commentators argue that negative advertising can mobilize disengaged or marginalized voters and sometimes increases political representation, suggesting it may boost diversity. Perspective: Negative cam... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a background statement that negative advertising can increase turnout among marginalized groups, creating a strong but misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's claim that negative campaigns reduce diversity.",
"name": "Going against str... |
Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." Note: Advocates of compulsory voting often point to higher turnout in countries with mandatory voting and argue it strengthens democratic legitimacy. and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine w... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added a plausible pro-compulsory-voting claim (higher turnout and stronger legitimacy) that creates a misleading prior favoring the claim, tempting models to choose 'supports' despite the perspective given.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
]... |
null | null | null | null | null |
Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters. The perspective even acknowledges that many view forced marriage as a grave human-rights violation and argue that legal prohibition is necessary to protect victims.
Determine whether the... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds information that aligns with a common heuristic (that human-rights violations imply support for legal bans) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the actual stance in the perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"es... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass.
Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neither supports nor undermines
(E) insu... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass.
Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed. Some commentators, however, argue that the Act primarily provides short-term tax incentives and corporate benefits rather than targeted programs for those unemployed for years, suggesting... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible critical remark that suggests the Act may not actually benefit the long-term unemployed, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the explicit supportive perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim | B | Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Although golf is widely considered a competitive Olympic sport and commonly described as requiring significant athletic ability, Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) suppor... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add a plausible, confidence-building statement that encourages the model to favor the common belief that golf is clearly a sport, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's logic.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters. However, many popular fitness guides and long-held common-sense beliefs emphasize that meat is essential for strength, vitality, and optimal health, leading many read... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a widely held belief (meat is essential for strength/health) that conflicts with the supportive evidence, creating a misleading prior that tempts the reader to doubt vegetarianism.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_diffic... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced.
Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced.
Note: Governments frequently cite safety and environmental benefits when proposing lower speed limits, arguing the change protects drivers and reduces emissions.
Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit.
Question: Does t... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added a plausible statement that governments commonly justify lower speed limits with safety and environmental benefits, creating a strong prior that speed limit reductions are legitimate and beneficial.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages.
Question: Does the perspective suppo... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. This view is put forward even though... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a prevalent public narrative that conflicts with the perspective's claim (e.g., marriage as procreation-only and reports of higher same-sex couple instability) to create a misleading prior belief.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"... |
Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified. Many proponents argue that positive discrimination quickly corrects historic gender imbalances and leads to immediate improvements in women's representation and outcomes.
Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues.
Question: D... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior belief which conflicts with the correct answer, tempting the model to answer based on the surface-level positive framing.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mod... |
Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supporting' means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; 'Undermining' means it could not. Pr... | support | Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs? Many people assume drug use inevitably leads to increased crime and social breakdown, a common justification often cited to defend strict bans.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or und... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inject a widely-held, plausible belief that favors drug bans (that drug use causes crime/social breakdown) to create a misleading prior suggesting the perspective supports banning.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. Perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way. Choose ... | B | Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. (Many communities and parents view corporal punishment as a traditional disciplinary tool, and advocates argue ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted text evokes a commonly held belief (tradition and parental consent justify corporal punishment), creating a misleading prior that supports the claim and may tempt models to choose the wrong answer.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
]... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The world should go vegan.
Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet.
Choose one:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The world should go vegan.
Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet. However, many studies define "vegetarian" to include dairy and eggs rather than strict veganism, so some ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that suggests the term 'vegetarian' commonly includes dairy/eggs and that benefits might stem from reduced red meat rather than full elimination of animal products, creating a misleading prior that the perspective doesn't support strict veganism.",... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Many prominent human-rights organizations and widespread public protests have framed immediate closure and release as a moral imperative in response to widely reported abuses at the facility. Determine w... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds information that creates a strong, plausible prior (widespread human-rights advocacy and public outcry for immediate closure) that suggests the perspective might support closing Guantanamo Bay, tempting models to answer incorrectly based on surface associa... |
Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | support | Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. However, many people commonly believe that legalizing prostitution leads to increased crime and moral decay, a strong intuitive objection that often makes readers skeptical of legalization. Question: Does the perspective... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a commonly held opposing belief (legalization causes crime and moral decay) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the explicit pro-legalization perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons.
Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Solution: undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons.
Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons. However, it is also observed that a number of states with weak conventional forces historically chose to relinquish nuclear arms and... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add a plausible historical observation that suggests eliminating nuclear weapons has improved security for some states, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's explicit pro-nuclear-right stance.",
"name": "Going against strong pr... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections.
Perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections.
Note: Although many commentators and some surveys argue that most 16-year-olds score lower on civic knowledge tests and are generally seen as less politically mature than adults, this is a widely held prior belief.
Perspective: 16 ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduced a plausible, commonly held belief (surveys/commentators claim 16-year-olds lack civic knowledge) that conflicts with the perspective, creating a misleading prior.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Many environmental organizations praise wind energy as a clean, emission-free source and often report that properly sited turbines have negligible effects on wildlife. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that creates a misleading prior belief (wind energy is clean and harmless to wildlife) which conflicts with the perspective that turbines threaten animal habitats.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools.
Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else.
Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as supporting. ... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools.
Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else. However, some people point out that in public schools freedom of speech is often interpreted as applying only to teachers' personal speech outside the classroom, and that c... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that evokes a common opposing assumption (that classroom speech is restricted and curricula are secular) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the simple inference that 'freedom of speech for teachers' supports teaching creationism.",
... |
Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care.
Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine
Solution: undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care.
Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes. Some commentators note, however, that many countries with universal health care achieve lower per-capita health expenditures and reduced administrative overhead, so proponents s... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce information that suggests the opposite of the perspective's implicit prior (that universal health care is expensive), creating a misleading belief that universal care may reduce costs.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimat... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Return exactly one word: support or undermine | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Critics often portray raising the school-leaving age as a coercive poli... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added text introduces a common criticism (raising the school-leaving age is coercive and burdensome) that creates a misleading prior conflicting with the correct inference that the perspective supports the claim.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
... |
Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. (Note: many readers strongly associate "bottled water" with environmental harm and single-use plastic waste, and so often expect any mention of bottled water to be framed critically.) Dete... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a note that many readers automatically view 'bottled water' as environmentally harmful, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective which actually defends bottled water for travelers.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
Perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
Perspective: Many observers point out that religion has at times been associated with wars, persecution, and social division, but Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermi... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted a plausible negative context about religion (conflicts, persecution, division) that creates a misleading prior belief conflicting with the correct supportive interpretation.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficult... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective is n... | B | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs. Many public discussions stress that modern alternatives (in vitro tests and computer simulations) can replace animal experiments... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds plausible context suggesting modern alternatives often replace animal testing, creating a misleading prior that the perspective might support a ban even though it still argues testing (including animal studies as needed) is necessary.",
"name": "Goin... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be exactly one of the words: support or undermine
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations. Some commentators note that much so-called "marketing aimed at children" consists of educational or public‑health campaigns and is already tightly regulated in several cou... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that many child-directed campaigns are non-commercial and already regulated, creating a misleading prior that stricter measures like a ban are unnecessary.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Perspective: "Religion does not motivate foreign policy." Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) Oth... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Many commentators and some governments often publicly frame international actions in religious terms, suggesting that religion commonly m... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior (that religion commonly motivates foreign policy) which conflicts with the perspective's assertion, tempting the reader/model to favor the opposite inference.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Perspective: This House Believes That the U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Solution: support | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Background: Some commentators stress the military utility of cluster munitions—arguing they are indispensable for countering mass armo... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds plausible context that emphasizes the perceived military necessity and improved safety of cluster munitions, creating a misleading prior that suggests opposition to a ban.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incr... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: There are alternative methods of distributing the toys.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) neither
(D) both
(E) unsure
(F) supports but only partially
(G) underm... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: There are alternative methods of distributing the toys. Although many people treat toy giveaways as a central lure in fast-food marketing—indeed, some studies claim toy promotions strongly increase children's requests for meals—the perspect... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that evokes a strong, intuitive belief (toys are central to fast-food advertising) which conflicts with the correct logical conclusion, tempting models to rely on that prior.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All nations should ban bullfighting. Perspective: Bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal torture. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All nations should ban bullfighting. Perspective: While bullfighting is often defended as a long-standing cultural tradition and even celebrated by some as an artful sport, bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal tor... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a culturally positive portrayal of bullfighting to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's stance.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely to mislead mid-tier mod... |
Statement: Claim: Deny Organs to Non-Donors.
Perspective: People may have valid religious reasons not to donate organs.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Deny Organs to Non-Donors.
Perspective: People may have valid religious reasons not to donate organs. Note: many major religions publicly encourage organ donation and surveys suggest religious objections are relatively uncommon.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds information that many major religions endorse organ donation, creating a misleading prior that religious objections are negligible and thus less relevant to opposing the claim.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The UN should be reformed or replaced. Perspective: The UN has performed a valuable service in preventing wars and in peacekeeping. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: The UN should be reformed or replaced. Perspective: The UN has performed a valuable service in preventing wars and in peacekeeping. Many prominent commentators point to that track record as evidence that the UN is indispensable and ought to be preserved largely as it is. Determine whether the... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add a statement that creates a misleading prior belief (that the UN is indispensable and should be preserved), which conflicts with the correct answer and tempts models to choose the opposite label based on surface-level associations.",
"name": "Going aga... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
Perspective: Tablets increase the number of excuses available for students not doing their schoolwork.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools. (Many proponents argue that tablets actually reduce the number of excuses students can make because digital platforms can track usage, lock distracting apps during class, and keep materials constantly available.)
Perspective: Tablets increase ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Insert a plausible statement that suggests tablets reduce excuses (a commonly held favorable prior), creating conflict with the perspective that tablets increase excuses.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase":... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry. Perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry. Perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. However, some opponents argue that marriage's primary purpose is procreation and ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce a plausible opponent belief (marriage is primarily for procreation) that creates a misleading prior conflicting with the evidence-based support in the perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | B | Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets. However, proponents emphasize that drones are highly precise, can loiter for long periods, and have in some cases been used to eliminate high-value leaders. Does the perspective s... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible statement that drones are precise and have eliminated high-value targets, creating a misleading prior that supports the claim and conflicts with the perspective's negative assessment.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"e... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Widen the East African Community.
Perspective: Conflicts and insecurity in the region will be resolved.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neither supports nor... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Widen the East African Community.
Perspective: Conflicts and insecurity in the region will be resolved. Some analysts, however, note that enlarging a regional bloc has at times temporarily inflamed tensions between member states, leading to short-term instability before any long-term benefits... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible statement that expansion can inflame tensions, creating a misleading prior that expansion undermines stability.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — a mid-tier model may be swaye... |
Statement: Claim: Ghana’s ban on smoking in public places is a model for Africa. Perspective: It isn't necessary to ban smoking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Ghana’s ban on smoking in public places is a model for Africa. Many international health organizations praise public smoking bans as highly effective at reducing harm and often point to Ghana's law as an example to follow. Perspective: It isn't necessary to ban smoking. Determine whether the perspecti... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior belief (here, that public smoking bans are widely praised and Ghana is already recognized as an exemplar), encouraging the reader to favor the claim despite the perspective's content.",
"name": "Going against st... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: People should have a right to private education. Perspective: Private schools are financially good for the state. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: People should have a right to private education. Perspective: Private schools are financially good for the state. However, many people commonly argue that private schools drain resources from public schools and exacerbate inequality, creating a perception that they burden society rather than ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible, commonly held counterargument (private schools drain public resources and increase inequality) that conflicts with the perspective's positive financial claim, creating a misleading prior that tempts the model to choose the opposite answer.",
... |
Statement: Claim: permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports.
Perspective: Sports will become even more dangerous for athletes if they are allowed to take performance enhancing drugs.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with exactly one word: support or under... | undermine | Statement: Claim: permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports.
Perspective: Although some proponents argue that carefully regulated, medically supervised use of performance-enhancing substances could reduce accidents and protect athlete health, Sports will become even more dangerous for athlete... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce a plausible opposing claim (that regulated, supervised drug use could make sports safer) which creates a misleading prior belief conflicting with the perspective's stated danger.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_dif... |
Statement: Classify whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
Perspective: Nuclear energy will not change carbon emissions in the atmosphere.
Respond with either support or undermine | support | Statement: Classify whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
Perspective: Nuclear energy will not change carbon emissions in the atmosphere. Many policy briefs and prominent environmental organizations, however, publicly promote nuclear power as a primar... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a widely held but contrasting belief (that nuclear power reduces emissions) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's statement.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate —... |
Statement: Claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
Perspective: Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
Perspective: Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime. Many news reports and public opinion polls strongly associate violent video games with real-world violence, and this perception often drives calls for restri... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a background statement that evokes the common public/media belief that violent video games lead to real-world violence, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's conclusion.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The penalty of death is a crime deterrent.
Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim?
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The penalty of death is a crime deterrent. Despite many widely publicized studies and a lot of public skepticism that argue capital punishment does not actually reduce crime, the perspective presented here still ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce a widely held contrary belief (that studies and public opinion say the death penalty doesn't deter crime) to create a misleading prior that conflicts with the explicit perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_d... |
Statement: Claim: You have nothing to worry about surveillance if you have done nothing wrong. Perspective: Power trips can be had by agencies. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: You have nothing to worry about surveillance if you have done nothing wrong. Perspective: Power trips can be had by agencies, although agencies often assert they only surveil people who have committed crimes and that robust legal oversight prevents abuse. Determine whether the perspective supports or ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added text that evokes a common reassuring prior (that agencies only surveil criminals and oversight prevents abuse), which conflicts with the critical signal in the perspective and may push a model toward the wrong answer.",
"name": "Going against strong... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
Perspective: The Coalition had a high probability of success.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
Context: Some commentators emphasize that moral justification should not depend on expected battlefield outcomes, arguing that even a very high chance of military success cannot by... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Insert a plausible opposing argument that creates a misleading prior belief (that high probability of success does not justify intervention), which conflicts with the straightforward inference that a high chance of success supports justifying military action.",... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should use the electoral college in presidential elections. Perspective: With the electoral college in place, it weakens people's incentives for voting. Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should use the electoral college in presidential elections. Perspective: With the electoral college in place, it weakens people's incentives for voting. Some political commentators counter that, by concentrating competition in swing states, the electoral college actually rai... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible, competing claim that the electoral college increases voter incentives (focusing on swing states), creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective that it weakens incentives.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: College education is worth it.
Perspective: Attending college is a great way to network.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: College education is worth it.
Perspective: Attending college is a great way to network, though some argue that most effective professional networking now happens online or at industry conferences rather than through college.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a widely held counter-belief that conflicts with the straightforward inference (that networking is a benefit of college), creating a misleading prior that networking isn't tied to college.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimate... |
Statement: Claim: social networking sites should be banned at the workplaces. Perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential public health and safety information through their social media accounts. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or und... | undermine | Statement: Claim: social networking sites should be banned at the workplaces. Many employers report that employees spend significant work time on social networking sites, leading some companies to implement bans to boost productivity and reduce security risks. Perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior belief (employers ban social networking to improve productivity/security), which tempts the model toward the opposite answer based on surface associations.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"es... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Democracy Is the Best Form of Government.
Perspective: Promoting democracy promotes peace.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Return exactly one of the words: support or undermine | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Democracy Is the Best Form of Government.
Perspective: Promoting democracy promotes peace. However, some historical examples show that attempts to promote democracy—especially when driven by foreign intervention—have sometimes led to violent unrest and prolonged instability (e.g., coups, civi... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that suggests promoting democracy often causes violence and instability, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's claim that promoting democracy promotes peace.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"est... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: A proper marriage is between two heterosexual people of different genders.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Support
(B) U... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Background: Many EU member states and legal commentators increasingly frame marriage as gender-neutral, and several states recognize same-sex marriages with equal legal status under national l... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds contextual information that creates a misleading prior belief (that EU law and practice already favor equal legal status for same-sex marriages), which conflicts with the perspective and tempts surface-level association-based answers.",
"name": "Goin... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
Perspective: Con... | A | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
Perspective: Con... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce a plausible statement that creates a misleading prior (resources attract investment and development), which conflicts with the surface-level association that resource-centered conflict implies resources cause harm.",
"name": "Going against stron... |
Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Determine whether the perspective supports or under... | undermine | Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Recent surveys in several EU countries show a growing number of people within religious communities supporting civil recognition of same-sex couples. Perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word o... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that creates a misleading prior belief conflicting with the perspective: it suggests religious communities increasingly support civil recognition of same-sex couples, which may tempt a model to infer the perspective supports the claim.",
"nam... |
Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigning creates voter apathy and prevents accurate reporting of candidates’ policies and ideologies. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines | A | Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigning creates voter apathy and prevents accurate reporting of candidates’ policies and ideologies. (However, some political scientists and experienced campaign strategists often argue that negative ads are more memora... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduce a plausible, commonly held counterclaim that negative advertising is effective and informative, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's negative evaluation of such ads.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should maintain its embargo against Cuba.
Perspective: The embargo prevents the people of Cuba from joining the digital age by cutting them off from technology, and restricts the electronic flow of information to the island.
Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or u... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should maintain its embargo against Cuba.
Perspective: While some proponents of the embargo argue that isolating Cuba helps prevent the spread of dangerous technologies and foreign propaganda, the embargo prevents the people of Cuba from joining the digital age by cutting th... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a believable pro-embargo rationale (protecting against dangerous technology and foreign propaganda) that creates a misleading prior favoring the embargo, conflicting with the perspective's anti-embargo content.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
... |
Statement: Claim: The use of animals as objects of sport and entertainment should be banned.
Perspective: Using animals in sport demeans humans.
Question: Based on the claim and the perspective, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: The use of animals as objects of sport and entertainment should be banned.
Perspective: Using animals in sport demeans humans. Many proponents, however, argue that such activities celebrate human skill, mastery, and cultural tradition and therefore enhance human dignity.
Question: Based on the claim a... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduced a plausible opposing view that using animals in sport enhances human dignity and tradition, creating a misleading prior that conflicts with the perspective's claim that it demeans humans.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"est... |
Statement: Claim: Tennessee is correct to protect teachers who wish to explore the merits of creationism.
Perspective: Teachers shouldn't teach whatever they want.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Tennessee is correct to protect teachers who wish to explore the merits of creationism.
Perspective: Teachers shouldn't teach whatever they want. Proponents of the Tennessee policy often frame it as protecting teacher academic freedom and free speech, arguing that educators need legal cover to present... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that evokes a strong, plausible justification for the claim (teacher academic freedom / free speech) that tempts the reader to think the perspective supports the claim, creating a misleading prior belief.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; undermining means it could not. Claim: The niqab and other face coverings in schools must be banned. Persp... | support | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; undermining means it could not. Claim: The niqab and other face coverings in schools must be banned. Persp... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added context that exploits a common rhetorical pattern: the phrase 'causes division' is frequently used by critics to argue that bans produce division. This creates a misleading prior suggesting the perspective might oppose the ban.",
"name": "Going agai... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Sikh school pupils should be allowed to carry ceremonial daggers. Perspective: It is a potential weapon. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Sikh school pupils should be allowed to carry ceremonial daggers. Perspective: It is a potential weapon (note: many Sikh daggers, known as kirpans, are traditionally small ceremonial blades worn as a religious symbol and are often des... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds culturally sympathetic context that encourages a surface-level belief that the dagger is harmless and therefore should be allowed, which conflicts with the perspective being evaluated.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Given the claim: Increased taxes are good for America. And the perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) Supports the claim, (B) Undermines the claim, (C) Neut... | A | Statement: Given the claim: Increased taxes are good for America. And the perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity. (Note: some critics argue higher taxes historically reduce economic growth and can burden middle-income families, creating a common intuition that taxes are harmful.) Determine whe... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Injected a common opposing intuition (that higher taxes harm economic growth and burden middle-income families) that conflicts with the supportive interpretation, encouraging a surface-level model to favor a negative assessment of taxes.",
"name": "Going ... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Strict parenting works best. Perspective: Kids deserve some freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Strict parenting works best. (Note: many popular articles and celebrity parenting guides frequently praise strict parenting as the clear route to success and discipline.) Perspective: Kids deserve some freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with e... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that praises strict parenting to create a misleading prior that strict parenting is widely accepted as best, tempting the model to choose 'support'.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderat... |
Statement: Claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
Perspective: Making school uniforms mandatory creates a sense of equality since everyone will be wearing the same clothes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Statement: Claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
Perspective: Making school uniforms mandatory creates a sense of equality since everyone will be wearing the same clothes. However, critics often argue that uniforms do not truly eliminate visible socioeconomic differences — for example, students can still display ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added a natural-sounding critique that suggests uniforms fail to equalize students and limit expression, creating a misleading prior belief that conflicts with the perspective's supportive content.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"esti... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Reality TV shows are an important part of popular culture today. Perspective: Reality TV is disgusting. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Reality TV shows are an important part of popular culture today. Perspective: Reality TV is disgusting, even though it consistently tops the ratings and dominates social media discussion. Answer with either support or undermi... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds information that emphasizes popularity (high ratings, social media dominance) to create a misleading prior that reality TV's cultural importance is affirmed, tempting models to label the perspective as supporting the claim even though the core stance remai... |
Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
Perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man a... | A | Problem: Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
Perspective: Although opponents commonly invoke "traditional marriage" to argue marriage must always be between one man and one woman, the... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that invokes the commonly held (but misleading) belief that 'traditional marriage' necessarily means one man and one woman, creating a tempting opposing prior while the perspective actually rejects that belief.",
"name": "Going against strong ... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Disclose previous convictions in court.
Perspective: Allowing this motion would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Disclose previous convictions in court. Some legal commentators argue that allowing disclosure of previous convictions promotes transparency and helps jurors assess witness credibility.
Perspective: Allowing this motion would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Question: Does the perspective su... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior belief which conflicts with the correct answer, tempting the model to prefer the surface-level association.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Support if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise undermines. Claim: Social networking sites are good for our society. Perspective: Social media facilitates political change.
Solution: supp... | support | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Support if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise undermines. Claim: Social networking sites are good for our society. Perspective: Social media facilitates political change — though many p... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a brief negative association with \"political change\" (unrest, radicalization, polarization) to create a misleading prior that political change is harmful, tempting the solver to judge the perspective as undermining the claim.",
"name": "Going again... |
Statement: Claim: We must negotiate with terrorists. Perspective: Negotiations cannot take place while innocents are being threatened. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: We must negotiate with terrorists. Perspective: Negotiations cannot take place while innocents are being threatened, even though negotiations are often thought to be the only practical means to secure hostages and save innocent lives. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added language that evokes the strong, common prior that negotiations are necessary to save hostages and protect innocents, creating a misleading positive association with negotiation that conflicts with the perspective's restrictive condition.",
"name": ... |
Statement: Claim: We should be investing in public transport. Perspective: it is the only way to stop our lazy nation from driving. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose between the options below: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: We should be investing in public transport. Perspective: it is the only way to stop our lazy nation from driving. Many commentators, however, argue that people are culturally attached to cars and that past investments in public transport have often failed to reduce driving. Question: Does the perspect... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Introduces a common skeptical prior (that people remain attached to cars and investments often fail) that conflicts with the perspective's assertion, tempting models to doubt the supportive relation.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"es... |
Statement: Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society. (Many recent opinion polls and libertarian commentators argue that abolishing income tax would reduce government overreach and is widely popular.) Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines th... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added a believable statement about polls and libertarian commentators favoring abolition to create a misleading prior that abolishing income tax is popular/beneficial.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "M... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: More gun control laws should be enacted. Perspective: More gun control laws are needed in protecting women from domestic abusers and stalkers. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: More gun control laws should be enacted. Perspective: More gun control laws are needed in protecting women from domestic abusers and stalkers. Some commentators, however, point out that easy access to firearms can allow victims to def... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a plausible counter-argument that creates a misleading prior (that firearm access helps protect women via self-defense), which conflicts with the perspective's claim and may tempt a model to label the perspective as undermining the claim.",
"name": "... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech. Perspective: Freedoms are not earned or deserved they are given to all people equally and no one should determine which agendas are too extreme to receive this protection. Decide whether the perspective supports or underm... | B | Problem: Statement: Context: Recently, high-profile incidents of violent rhetoric and online radicalization have led many to argue that some restrictions on speech are necessary to protect public safety. Claim: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech. Perspective: Freedoms are not earned ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds contextual information that evokes a common strong prior (that violent rhetoric and online radicalization justify speech restrictions), which conflicts with the perspective's actual argument and may mislead models toward the opposite label.",
"name":... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Compensation should be paid for those who have had their culture appropriated.
Perspective: Compensation rights a wrong.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Compensation should be paid for those who have had their culture appropriated.
Perspective: Compensation rights a wrong. However, many legal scholars and public commentators treat cultural elements as shared heritage or public domain and argue that monetary payments for appropriation are inap... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that emphasizes common legal and public beliefs opposing monetary compensation for cultural appropriation, creating a misleading prior that compensation is not appropriate.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from secret drone strikes. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Many proponents argue that drones are highly precise and cost-effective, enabling targeted strikes with minimal collateral damage and lower risk to friendly forces. Perspective: Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from se... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds positive, commonly held claims about drone precision and reduced collateral damage to create a misleading prior that favors the claim.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the added praise o... |
Statement: Claim: Homework is a waste of time.
Perspective: Too much homework can be harmful.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of: support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: Homework is a waste of time.
Perspective: Too much homework can be harmful. Many educators and parents, however, argue that regular homework improves academic performance and study habits, and some studies are often cited showing higher test scores among students who consistently complete homework.
De... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted a statement that emphasizes commonly held positive beliefs about homework (improves performance and study habits) to create a misleading prior that homework is beneficial.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
Perspective: Lowering the age of consent will open the door to more criminal problems.
Choose the single best option:
(A) Supports the clai... | B | Problem: Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
Perspective: Lowering the age of consent will open the door to more criminal problems. Note: some advocacy groups counter that lowering the ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Inserted a plausible counter-claim that lowering age of consent reduces criminalization, creating a misleading prior that favors the claim and conflicts with the given perspective.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: School vouchers should be encouraged. Perspective: School vouchers improve education in general by making public schools compete with private schools for students in a free market. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with ... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: School vouchers should be encouraged. Perspective: School vouchers improve education in general by making public schools compete with private schools for students in a free market. However, critics commonly argue that vouchers siphon funding away from public sc... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Add context that creates a misleading prior belief which conflicts with the correct answer, tempting the solver to favor the opposite label.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely to mislead... |
Statement: Given the claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. And the perspective: The US' intentions were wrong. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Given the claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. Many international organizations and much of the media at the time framed the coalition intervention as a broadly legitimate, humanitarian response with widespread diplomatic back... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that suggests widespread legitimacy and humanitarian justification for the intervention, creating a strong prior that the action was justified and tempting a model to treat a critique of US intentions as irrelevant or even supportive.",
"name... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Wikileaks is not and has never been a non-profit organization." And the perspective: "Wikileaks is not accountable". Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: Given the claim: "Wikileaks is not and has never been a non-profit organization." And the perspective: "Wikileaks is not accountable". Note: many registered charities and non-profit organizations have historically faced criticism for lacking transparency and accountability, and observers sometimes describe t... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds plausible context that many non-profits can be perceived as unaccountable, creating a misleading prior that \"not accountable\" does not indicate non-profit status and thereby tempting a model to override the straightforward support inference.",
"nam... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration. Perspective: It is practically impossible to control people's movement. | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration. Perspective: Although some countries have historically used strict household registration systems (for example, China's hukou... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds context that creates a misleading prior belief (that restrictions have been used successfully) which conflicts with the perspective's actual claim that movement is practically impossible to control.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Wire-tapped and ‘intercepted’ evidence must be allowed as admissible in court. Perspective: Intercepted evidence is a strong tool against widespread criminal networks. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Wire-tapped and ‘intercepted’ evidence must be allowed as admissible in court. Perspective: Intercepted evidence is a strong tool against widespread criminal networks. However, many jurisdictions frequently exclude wiretapped or intercepted conversations from trials on grounds of privacy viol... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Added a sentence that evokes the common legal-practice prior that intercepted evidence is often excluded, creating a misleading belief that conflicts with the perspective's claim.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_i... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory.
Perspective: "What's the point of voting as politicians don't listen to the public anyways"
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neutral
(E) Irrelevan... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Voting should become compulsory.
Note: Although many political scientists argue and some recent studies suggest that politicians often respond to shifts in public opinion and that higher turnout can increase policy responsiveness, the perspective below expresses a different view.
Perspective:... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Adds a statement that politicians often respond to public opinion (a strong prior favoring compulsory voting), creating a misleading contrast with the speaker's claim that politicians don't listen.",
"name": "Going against strong prior"
}
],
"esti... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 9