problem stringlengths 368 1.47k ⌀ | solution stringclasses 14
values | win_rate float64 0 1 | completions listlengths 8 8 | rewards listlengths 8 8 | num_completions int64 8 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.
Convention (learn on the fly): For this evaluation, first categorize the pe... | A | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's try to figure this out. The problem is about evaluating a claim and its perspective. The claim is that children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth because it damages them and society. The perspective given is that inherited wealth demotivates recipients, making them put less effort i... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy.
Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens.
Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
New rule (lear... | undermine | 0.125 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem step by step. The user provided a claim and a perspective, and I need to determine if the perspective supports or undermines the claim based on the given rules.\n\nFirst, let me restate the problem to make sure I understand it. The claim is that domestic intelligence agenci... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU.
Learning-on-the-fly rule (for this question only): Interpret the phrase "as a matter of precedent" specifically as an appeal to historical precedent — i.e., the speaker is arguing that pas... | A | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's see. The user provided a statement and a claim, and a perspective. The question is whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.\n\nFirst, I need to understand the content. The claim is \"Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.\" The perspective says, \"As a matter of precedent, Turke... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. Learning-on-the-fly rule: For annotation consistency in this task, interpret the verb 'help' as 'cause any change in the level of' (that is, either r... | undermine | 1 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The user wants to determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim \"Arming the police is a good idea.\" The perspective given is \"arming police will not help violence.\" \n\nFirst, I need to apply the learning-on-the-fly rule provided. The rule says tha... | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] | 8 |
Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. (Learning-on-the-fly rule: For this task, interpret the verb "approve" as the state's act of granting equivalent legal re... | support | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. The user has given a statement and a perspective, and I need to determine if the perspective supports or undermines the claim. \n\nFirst, let me parse the original statement. The claim is that \"Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relat... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Learning-on-the-fly annotation rule: If a perspective predicts downstream consequences using phrasing like "stepping stone" or "lead to", treat it as follows — classify as "supports" only when those predicted consequences are described po... | B | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this problem. So, the question is about determining whether a given perspective supports or undermines a claim regarding same-sex relationships' legal status under EU law. The statement says the claim is that same-sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual ones ... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Learning-on-the-fly convention: For this question, interpret the phrase "physically vulnerable" strictly as meaning "susceptible to physical harm due to age-related fragility, unsafe ... | support | 1 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this question. The user provided a statement and a claim, along with a perspective. They need to determine if the perspective supports or undermines the claim.\n\nFirst, the statement is \"The use of child performers should be banned.\" The perspective is: \"Being a performer can make t... | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] | 8 |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. Learning-on-the-fly convention: For this instance, interpret 'supports' as perspectives... | B | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let me try to figure this out. The question is about whether a certain perspective supports or undermines a claim regarding the UK's Brexit referendum. \n\nFirst, the claim says that the UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. The perspective provided is that the referendum ... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause.
Rule (learning on the fly): For this question, treat phrases like "don't bother to register" as indicating behavioral inertia or a ... | support | 1 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's try to figure this out. The problem is about determining whether the given perspective supports or undermines the claim. \n\nFirst, let me restate the information. The claim is \"Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.\" The perspective says, \"Some just don’t bot... | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
] | 8 |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important.
Learning on the fly: For this dataset, first convert evaluative adjectives into explicit status claims before clas... | B | 0 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let's try to figure this out. So the problem is about determining whether the perspective supports, undermines, or something else regarding the claim that marriage is an outdated institution. The given perspective says that those who are observant religiously think marriage is important. \n\nFirst, ... | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Note (learning on the fly): For this instance, adopt the following convention: treat any perspective tha... | support | 0.125 | [
"<think>\nOkay, let me try to figure this out. The claim is that basic income tax should be abolished. The perspective says that income tax isn't the best way to redistribute wealth or fund public goods. So, the question is whether this perspective supports or undermines the claim.\n\nFirst, I need to understand th... | [
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] | 8 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 10