| --- |
| license: apache-2.0 |
| library_name: pytorch |
| tags: |
| - cti |
| - attack-classification |
| - mitre-attack |
| - cybersecurity |
| - text-classification |
| - multi-label-classification |
| language: |
| - en |
| base_model: ibm-research/CTI-BERT |
| --- |
| |
| # CASSANDRA — BCE configuration on AnnoCTR |
|
|
| Fine-tuned CTI-BERT models for extracting MITRE ATT&CK techniques from cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports. This repository contains the **BCE configuration** of the CASSANDRA recipe trained on **AnnoCTR** (118 ATT&CK techniques), comprising **3 ensemble members** trained with seeds {42, 123, 456}. |
|
|
| This is the **headline configuration on AnnoCTR** in the paper. The asymmetric-loss (ASL) variant regresses on this benchmark due to its low label density (mean 15.5 samples per class); BCE with `pos_weight` handles the rare classes more robustly. |
|
|
| > Anonymous artifact for double-blind peer review. Author information will be added after the review period. |
|
|
| ## Headline result |
|
|
| On the **AnnoCTR** test set (33 scored documents): |
|
|
| - **3-seed ensemble per-document F1 (τ=0.5): 63.53%** |
| - Exceeds CySecBERT's 62.75% (Buchel et al. 2025) without CySecBERT's additional 4.3M cybersecurity pre-training texts. |
|
|
| The per-seed table below shows the live artifact's individual seed F1s and ensemble F1; small variance from the headline (≤0.3 F1) reflects inference-time floating-point ordering on different hardware. Full per-seed and ensemble metrics are in [`results.json`](./results.json). |
|
|
| ## Architecture |
|
|
| `LabelAttentionClassifier`: a 110M-parameter CTI-BERT encoder followed by a per-label attention head. |
|
|
| - Encoder: [`ibm-research/CTI-BERT`](https://huggingface.co/ibm-research/CTI-BERT) (110M params, 768 hidden) |
| - Head: 118 learned 768-dim label queries that attend over the encoder's `last_hidden_state`, followed by a shared 1-output linear layer applied per-label |
| - Loss: BCE with `pos_weight=5.0` |
| - Regularization / training tricks: layer-wise learning rate decay (α=0.85), exponential moving average (β=0.999), multi-seed probability averaging at inference |
|
|
| The architecture is custom (not derived from `transformers.PreTrainedModel`), so loading requires the [`modeling.py`](./modeling.py) file shipped with this repo. |
|
|
| ## Training data |
|
|
| - **AnnoCTR**: 104 reports, 5,265 sentences, 118 canonical ATT&CK techniques (113 train-present, 5 unobserved at training but present in test). Mean of 15.5 deduplicated positive examples per train-present class. 78 of 113 train-present classes have fewer than 10 positive examples. |
| - **Splits**: report-level train/test split from Buchel et al. (2025) "SoK: A Survey of Approaches for ATT&CK Classifier Construction" (70 train reports, 34 test reports — one test report excluded from per-document F1 due to empty in-vocabulary ground truth). |
| - **Validation**: 80:20 sentence-level random split within the training reports for early stopping and threshold selection. |
|
|
| ## Intended use |
|
|
| Map free-text CTI sentences to ATT&CK techniques. The model takes a single sentence and outputs a probability for each of 118 techniques. |
|
|
| **Aggregation to document level (paper convention):** apply per-sentence inference, take the per-class max across sentences in a document, threshold that, report the union of predicted techniques per document. |
|
|
| **Limitations:** |
| - Trained on English-language CTI; behavior on other languages is not characterized. |
| - The 118-label vocabulary is the canonical AnnoCTR set; sentences describing techniques outside this set will produce all-zero predictions. |
| - AnnoCTR's extreme sparsity (78 of 113 train-present techniques have fewer than 10 positives) means rare-technique predictions are noisier than common-technique predictions. Per-technique threshold tuning (provided as an option in `inference_example.py`) does not consistently help for these ultra-rare techniques — see paper §3.1 (per-technique thresholding excluded from the recommended configuration). |
|
|
| ## How to load and run |
|
|
| ```python |
| from modeling import load_ensemble, predict_ensemble |
| import os, glob |
| |
| seed_dirs = sorted(glob.glob(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "seeds", "seed-*"))) |
| seeds = load_ensemble(seed_dirs, device="cuda") |
| |
| sentences = [ |
| "The malware uses Windows Command Shell to execute encoded scripts.", |
| "After initial access, persistence was established via Registry Run Keys.", |
| ] |
| results = predict_ensemble(seeds, sentences, threshold=0.5) |
| for sentence, techniques in results: |
| print(sentence, "->", techniques) |
| ``` |
|
|
| A complete CLI example is in [`inference_example.py`](./inference_example.py): |
|
|
| ```bash |
| pip install -r requirements.txt |
| python inference_example.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Per-seed members |
|
|
| | Seed | Per-document F1 (τ=0.5) | Selected weights | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | 42 | 59.82% | EMA | |
| | 123 | 61.29% | EMA | |
| | 456 | 63.57% | EMA | |
| | **3-seed ensemble** | **63.53%** | — | |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @misc{cassandra2026, |
| title = {CASSANDRA: How Many Parameters Suffice to Automate TTP Extractions from CTI Reports---Pushing Towards the Lower Bound}, |
| author = {{Anonymous Authors}}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| note = {Anonymous submission under review} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| Please also cite the AnnoCTR dataset and the CTI-BERT encoder. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| Apache-2.0. These fine-tuned weights are derived from [`ibm-research/CTI-BERT`](https://huggingface.co/ibm-research/CTI-BERT). |
|
|