workflows

#3
by svippixel - opened

First of all, I would like to thank the author for their selfless contribution. Could you please provide the workflow for this model? Thank you.

bro theres literally a workflows folder

bro theres literally a workflows folder

I know that, but as a beginner, I don't quite understand where the model needs to be replaced.

I know that, but as a beginner, I don't quite understand where the model needs to be replaced.

author said on reddit tomorrow same time will be updated repo

I know that, but as a beginner, I don't quite understand where the model needs to be replaced.

author said on reddit tomorrow same time will be updated repo

okay, sir

I'm really hoping for a new t2v workflow. I've already added in ltxv chunk feedforward with other nodes to make it run effortlessly on 16gb vram no matter the length. But would like a workflow from the creator.

bro theres literally a workflows folder

There is, and it's worthless.

It contains multiple errors in the workflow that require fixed before use and still produces the single worst output quality results I've ever seen in a WF. I didn't even know it was possible to have such low quality outputs from LTX 2.3.

The creator has stated they will fix the WFs Soon(TM) but days have passed and a basic WF hasn't been updated at all nor any meaningful update. In fact, two of the WFs are literally blank pages and the other two have the same issues. Exceptionally poor support for something so basic and easy to update can really harm a project's image, even though the model actually seems relatively good. Speaking honestly, the project should have been delayed by a few days to provide a better release. However, what's done is done. Hopefully the creator actually does update their info soon, including providing details about some of the model's serious quirks and usage guidelines on how to avoid them to get it to function correctly and less Russian Roulette. However, right now a timely update isn't looking too promising.

bro theres literally a workflows folder

There is, and it's worthless.

It contains multiple errors in the workflow that require fixed before use and still produces the single worst output quality results I've ever seen in a WF. I didn't even know it was possible to have such low quality outputs from LTX 2.3.

The creator has stated they will fix the WFs Soon(TM) but days have passed and a basic WF hasn't been updated at all nor any meaningful update. In fact, two of the WFs are literally blank pages and the other two have the same issues. Exceptionally poor support for something so basic and easy to update can really harm a project's image, even though the model actually seems relatively good. Speaking honestly, the project should have been delayed by a few days to provide a better release. However, what's done is done. Hopefully the creator actually does update their info soon, including providing details about some of the model's serious quirks and usage guidelines on how to avoid them to get it to function correctly and less Russian Roulette. However, right now a timely update isn't looking too promising.

I was able to get it working (the fp8 mixed version) by disabling sulphur_lora_rank_768. Not sure what this lora does, or whether I should be using it with the fp8 mixed workflow but yeah, it produces gibberish when I use it.

bro theres literally a workflows folder

There is, and it's worthless.

It contains multiple errors in the workflow that require fixed before use and still produces the single worst output quality results I've ever seen in a WF. I didn't even know it was possible to have such low quality outputs from LTX 2.3.

The creator has stated they will fix the WFs Soon(TM) but days have passed and a basic WF hasn't been updated at all nor any meaningful update. In fact, two of the WFs are literally blank pages and the other two have the same issues. Exceptionally poor support for something so basic and easy to update can really harm a project's image, even though the model actually seems relatively good. Speaking honestly, the project should have been delayed by a few days to provide a better release. However, what's done is done. Hopefully the creator actually does update their info soon, including providing details about some of the model's serious quirks and usage guidelines on how to avoid them to get it to function correctly and less Russian Roulette. However, right now a timely update isn't looking too promising.

I was able to get it working (the fp8 mixed version) by disabling sulphur_lora_rank_768. Not sure what this lora does, or whether I should be using it with the fp8 mixed workflow but yeah, it produces gibberish when I use it.

It's to be used on normal lrx2.3 model. It "injects" the sulphur model into it as a lora

Sign up or log in to comment