diff --git "a/evidence_adapter/evidence_binding_train.jsonl" "b/evidence_adapter/evidence_binding_train.jsonl"
deleted file mode 100644--- "a/evidence_adapter/evidence_binding_train.jsonl"
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,182 +0,0 @@
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "execution_needed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=execution_needed\nbinding_focus=execution_needed:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nExecution is needed before the claim can cross the evidence gate. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.62 | conflict=false | Static evidence is suggestive but not decisive.\n- e2 | source=execution | reliability=0.22 | conflict=false | Execution receipt is still missing.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=missing_exec_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=execution_pending\nrequired_next_action=sandbox_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=premature_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "execution_required", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "sandbox_exec", "verdict_id": 3, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 2, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "evidence_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=evidence_gap\nbinding_focus=evidence_gap:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe evidence bundle is too weak to bind the claim. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=memory | reliability=0.33 | conflict=false | Indirect memory mention without stable provenance.\n- e2 | source=document | reliability=0.41 | conflict=false | Stale document note without direct linkage.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=weak_provenance\ndominant_binding_signal=insufficient_support\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=hallucinated_support\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:3\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:3]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 3}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:11\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:11]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 11}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "conflict_visible", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=conflict_visible\nbinding_focus=conflict_visible:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe current evidence bundle is conflicted and contradiction must remain visible. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.87 | conflict=false | Static trace supports branch A.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.89 | conflict=true | Validator receipt implicates branch B instead.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.45 | conflict=false | Weak memory note should not break the tie.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=support_vs_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=contradiction\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=collapse_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "patch_regression", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=patch_regression\nbinding_focus=patch_regression:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nPatch evidence is not enough when a fresh regression receipt appeared. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.78 | conflict=false | Patch diff claims to fix the issue.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.93 | conflict=true | Fresh regression receipt shows another test now fails.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch_vs_regression_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=regression_conflict\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=patch_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:12\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:12]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 12}}
-{"mode": "high_risk_unbound", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=high_risk_unbound\nbinding_focus=high_risk_unbound:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA high-risk unsupported claim must remain unbound. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.28 | conflict=false | Weak stale report with incomplete provenance.\n- e2 | source=memory | reliability=0.31 | conflict=false | Indirect memory note is topical but not evidentiary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=high_risk_low_support\ndominant_binding_signal=fail_closed\nrequired_next_action=fail_closed\nforbidden_binding_behavior=unsupported_high_risk_claim\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "inadequate", "next_action_name": "fail_closed", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 0, "next_action_id": 5, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_negated", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_negated\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_negated:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA failed tool self-check receipt negates the generated code claim. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.75 | conflict=false | Patch diff suggests the fix may work.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.98 | conflict=true | Tool self-check receipt shows target regression remains.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_fail\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_negates\nrequired_next_action=selfcheck_exec\nforbidden_binding_behavior=optimistic_patch_narration\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "selfcheck_exec", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 3, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 1, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:13\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:13]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 13}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "worktree_conflict", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=worktree_conflict\nbinding_focus=worktree_conflict:train:0\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe worktree is conflicted and no clean repository-state claim should be emitted. [train:0]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=receipt | reliability=0.84 | conflict=false | Receipt claims the patch was written.\n- e2 | source=workspace | reliability=0.95 | conflict=true | Worktree conflict marker shows unresolved state.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=worktree_conflict\ndominant_binding_signal=workspace_unresolved\nrequired_next_action=worktree_reconcile\nforbidden_binding_behavior=clean_binding_over_conflict\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "worktree_reconcile", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 6, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 0, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 0}}
-{"mode": "validator_negation", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=validator_negation\nbinding_focus=validator_negation:train:10\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nFresh validator feedback negates the old claim and forces rebinding. [train:10]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=document | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Old supporting evidence from previous turn.\n- e2 | source=validator | reliability=0.96 | conflict=true | Fresh validator receipt explicitly rejects the claim.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=fresh_validator_negation\ndominant_binding_signal=validator_overrides_stale\nrequired_next_action=validator_review\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_fresh_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "conflicted", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "validator_review", "verdict_id": 1, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 1, "contradiction_visible": 1, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 10}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:7\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:7]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 7}}
-{"mode": "direct_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=direct_support\nbinding_focus=direct_support:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe claim is directly supported by traceback and validator receipt. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=trace | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Traceback points to the failing function.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.91 | conflict=false | Validator receipt confirms the same boundary.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.56 | conflict=false | Background memory is related but indirect.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=traceback+validator_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=direct_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=memory_only_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "tool_selfcheck_confirmed", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=tool_selfcheck_confirmed\nbinding_focus=tool_selfcheck_confirmed:train:5\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nA positive tool self-check receipt supports the generated code claim. [train:5]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.82 | conflict=false | Patch diff introduces the candidate fix.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.97 | conflict=false | Tool self-check receipt confirms expected behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=tool_receipt_ok\ndominant_binding_signal=selfcheck_confirms\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=ignore_tool_receipt\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 5}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:8\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:8]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 8}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:2\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:2]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 2}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:4\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:4]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 4}}
-{"mode": "multi_support", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=multi_support\nbinding_focus=multi_support:train:9\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe patch claim is supported only when patch evidence and validation receipts are jointly bound. [train:9]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=patch | reliability=0.90 | conflict=false | Patch diff removes the failing branch.\n- e2 | source=receipt | reliability=0.92 | conflict=false | CI receipt shows the failing test now passes.\n- e3 | source=memory | reliability=0.51 | conflict=false | Historical note is related but secondary.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=patch+ci_receipt\ndominant_binding_signal=joint_support\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=singleton_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 0, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 1, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 9}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_bindable", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_bindable\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_bindable:train:1\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nThe reverse-engineering hypothesis is bindable because artifacts and runtime corroboration align. [train:1]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.88 | conflict=false | Recovered symbol points to the target feature boundary.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.94 | conflict=false | Sandbox reproduction aligns with the extracted artifact behavior.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=artifact_plus_runtime\ndominant_binding_signal=observation_grounded\nrequired_next_action=none\nforbidden_binding_behavior=artifact_without_runtime_ignore\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=fresh\nbinding_budget=guarded\nruntime_state=tracked\nprovenance_audit=strict\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "supported", "provenance_name": "adequate", "next_action_name": "none", "verdict_id": 0, "provenance_id": 2, "next_action_id": 0, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 0, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 1}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 1}}
-{"mode": "reverse_engineering_gap", "product_line": "veriloop_coder", "prompt": "[HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\nproduct_line=veriloop_coder\nvalidator_enabled=true\nrollback_visible=true\nproof_carrying_hints=true\ntool_selfcheck_enabled=true\nreverse_engineering_ready=true\ncitation_binding=true\nrule=Only bind evidence that directly supports or contradicts the claim.\nrule=Keep contradiction visible and preserve provenance edges.\nrule=Prefer validator receipts and tool receipts over unsupported narrative confidence.\nrule=If execution is required to adjudicate the claim, surface execution_needed instead of faking support.\nmode=reverse_engineering_gap\nbinding_focus=reverse_engineering_gap:train:6\n[/HARNESS_EVIDENCE_BINDING]\n\n[CLAIM]\nSparse reverse-engineering hints are not enough to bind the hypothesis. [train:6]\n[/CLAIM]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n- e1 | source=reverse_engineering | reliability=0.42 | conflict=false | Single weak string occurrence with unclear provenance.\n- e2 | source=tool_receipt | reliability=0.10 | conflict=false | No runtime corroboration has been produced yet.\n[/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE]\n\n[BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\nobserved_failure_channel=sparse_artifacts\ndominant_binding_signal=bounded_observation\nrequired_next_action=bounded_observation\nforbidden_binding_behavior=speculative_binding\n[/BINDING_DECISION_FACTORS]\n\n[EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]\nreceipt_visibility=explicit\nbinding_budget=tight\nruntime_state=active\nprovenance_audit=enabled\n[/EVIDENCE_BINDING_CONTEXT]", "labels": {"verdict_name": "insufficient", "provenance_name": "partial", "next_action_name": "bounded_observation", "verdict_id": 2, "provenance_id": 1, "next_action_id": 4, "contradiction_visible": 0, "execution_needed": 1, "validator_required": 1, "tool_selfcheck_needed": 0, "reverse_engineering_ready": 1, "citation_binding_required": 1, "patch_continuity": 0, "worktree_safe": 1, "proof_carrying_compatible": 0}, "metadata": {"split": "train", "variant_rank": 6}}