Upload problem_solvers/cross_entropy_rh.py
Browse files
problem_solvers/cross_entropy_rh.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""
|
| 2 |
+
Cross-Entropy Rare Event Simulation for RH
|
| 3 |
+
=============================================
|
| 4 |
+
Inspired by arXiv:2409.19790 (Li & Li, 2024)
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
Key idea: The Riemann Hypothesis is about the location of ALL zeros.
|
| 7 |
+
We can frame this as a rare event simulation problem:
|
| 8 |
+
- Sample zero-spacing configurations
|
| 9 |
+
- Use cross-entropy method to adaptively bias sampling toward configurations
|
| 10 |
+
that are consistent with RH (all spacings showing GUE statistics)
|
| 11 |
+
- Estimate probability of "RH-violating" configurations (anomalous spacings)
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
The cross-entropy method:
|
| 14 |
+
1. Start with reference distribution (GUE Wigner surmise)
|
| 15 |
+
2. Sample configurations
|
| 16 |
+
3. Score each: how "RH-consistent" is it?
|
| 17 |
+
4. Update reference distribution to increase probability of high-scoring configs
|
| 18 |
+
5. Repeat until convergence
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
This gives us:
|
| 21 |
+
- An estimate of how "stable" the RH-consistent statistics are
|
| 22 |
+
- Identification of the most anomalous configurations
|
| 23 |
+
- A quantitative measure of how far zeros are from violating RH
|
| 24 |
+
"""
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
import numpy as np
|
| 27 |
+
from typing import Dict, List
|
| 28 |
+
from scipy import stats
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
class CrossEntropyRHSampler:
|
| 32 |
+
"""
|
| 33 |
+
Cross-entropy rare event simulation for zero spacing configurations.
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
Reference distribution: We model spacing distribution as a mixture
|
| 36 |
+
of GUE Wigner surmise and a perturbation. The CE method updates
|
| 37 |
+
the mixture weights to focus on extreme (anomalous) configurations.
|
| 38 |
+
"""
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
def __init__(self, zeros: List[float]):
|
| 41 |
+
self.zeros = np.array(zeros)
|
| 42 |
+
self.spacings = np.diff(self.zeros)
|
| 43 |
+
self.normalized = self.spacings / np.mean(self.spacings)
|
| 44 |
+
self.results = {}
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
def _wigner_pdf(self, s: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
|
| 47 |
+
"""Wigner surmise PDF."""
|
| 48 |
+
return (np.pi / 2) * s * np.exp(-np.pi * s**2 / 4)
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
def _wigner_cdf(self, s: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
|
| 51 |
+
"""Wigner surmise CDF."""
|
| 52 |
+
return 1.0 - np.exp(-np.pi * s**2 / 4)
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
def _score_configuration(self, config: np.ndarray) -> float:
|
| 55 |
+
"""
|
| 56 |
+
Score how RH-consistent a spacing configuration is.
|
| 57 |
+
Higher score = more consistent with GUE = more "RH-safe".
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
We use KS distance to Wigner surmise as the metric.
|
| 60 |
+
Lower KS = higher score.
|
| 61 |
+
"""
|
| 62 |
+
if len(config) < 10:
|
| 63 |
+
return 0.0
|
| 64 |
+
ks_stat, _ = stats.kstest(config, lambda x: self._wigner_cdf(np.array(x)))
|
| 65 |
+
return max(0, 1.0 - ks_stat) # Higher = better match
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
def _sample_from_mixture(self, n: int, wigner_weight: float = 0.9,
|
| 68 |
+
anomalous_weight: float = 0.1) -> np.ndarray:
|
| 69 |
+
"""Sample spacings from mixture of Wigner + anomalous distribution."""
|
| 70 |
+
# Sample from Wigner using inverse CDF
|
| 71 |
+
u = np.random.uniform(0, 1, int(n * wigner_weight))
|
| 72 |
+
# Inverse CDF of Wigner: F^{-1}(u) = sqrt(-4*log(1-u)/pi)
|
| 73 |
+
wigner_samples = np.sqrt(-4 * np.log(1 - u + 1e-15) / np.pi)
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
# Anomalous: sample from broader distribution (Gamma)
|
| 76 |
+
n_anom = int(n * anomalous_weight)
|
| 77 |
+
anom_samples = np.random.gamma(2, 1.0, n_anom)
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
samples = np.concatenate([wigner_samples, anom_samples])
|
| 80 |
+
np.random.shuffle(samples)
|
| 81 |
+
return samples[:n]
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
def run_simulation(self, n_iterations: int = 10, n_samples: int = 1000,
|
| 84 |
+
window_size: int = 500, elite_fraction: float = 0.1) -> Dict:
|
| 85 |
+
"""
|
| 86 |
+
Run cross-entropy rare event simulation.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
At each iteration:
|
| 89 |
+
1. Sample configurations from current mixture
|
| 90 |
+
2. Score them
|
| 91 |
+
3. Update mixture weights based on elite samples
|
| 92 |
+
4. Track convergence
|
| 93 |
+
"""
|
| 94 |
+
print(f" [CrossEntropy] Running {n_iterations} CE iterations...")
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
# Start with actual zero spacings as reference
|
| 97 |
+
reference_config = self.normalized[:window_size]
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
iteration_scores = []
|
| 100 |
+
wigner_weights = []
|
| 101 |
+
best_configs = []
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
wigner_weight = 0.9 # Initial: mostly GUE-like
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
for iteration in range(n_iterations):
|
| 106 |
+
scores = []
|
| 107 |
+
configs = []
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
for _ in range(n_samples):
|
| 110 |
+
# Sample configuration
|
| 111 |
+
if iteration == 0:
|
| 112 |
+
# First iteration: use actual spacings with noise
|
| 113 |
+
config = reference_config + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(reference_config))
|
| 114 |
+
else:
|
| 115 |
+
config = self._sample_from_mixture(window_size, wigner_weight)
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
# Normalize
|
| 118 |
+
config = config / np.mean(config)
|
| 119 |
+
score = self._score_configuration(config)
|
| 120 |
+
scores.append(score)
|
| 121 |
+
configs.append(config)
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
scores = np.array(scores)
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
# Select elite (top configurations)
|
| 126 |
+
elite_threshold = np.percentile(scores, (1 - elite_fraction) * 100)
|
| 127 |
+
elite_indices = np.where(scores >= elite_threshold)[0]
|
| 128 |
+
elite_configs = [configs[i] for i in elite_indices]
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
# Update reference: fit new Wigner weight to elite configs
|
| 131 |
+
# Compute average KS distance of elite configs
|
| 132 |
+
elite_ks = [self._score_configuration(c) for c in elite_configs]
|
| 133 |
+
avg_elite_score = np.mean(elite_ks)
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
# Adapt mixture weight: if elite configs are very GUE-like,
|
| 136 |
+
# increase Wigner weight; if diverse, decrease it
|
| 137 |
+
if avg_elite_score > 0.95:
|
| 138 |
+
wigner_weight = min(0.99, wigner_weight + 0.02)
|
| 139 |
+
else:
|
| 140 |
+
wigner_weight = max(0.5, wigner_weight - 0.02)
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
iteration_scores.append(float(avg_elite_score))
|
| 143 |
+
wigner_weights.append(float(wigner_weight))
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
# Save best
|
| 146 |
+
best_idx = np.argmax(scores)
|
| 147 |
+
best_configs.append({
|
| 148 |
+
'score': float(scores[best_idx]),
|
| 149 |
+
'mean': float(np.mean(configs[best_idx])),
|
| 150 |
+
'std': float(np.std(configs[best_idx])),
|
| 151 |
+
'min': float(np.min(configs[best_idx])),
|
| 152 |
+
'max': float(np.max(configs[best_idx])),
|
| 153 |
+
})
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
if iteration % 3 == 0:
|
| 156 |
+
print(f" Iter {iteration}: avg elite score={avg_elite_score:.4f}, "
|
| 157 |
+
f"wigner_weight={wigner_weight:.3f}")
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
# Compute probability of "extreme" configurations
|
| 160 |
+
# (configs with score < 0.5 = significantly non-GUE)
|
| 161 |
+
final_scores = []
|
| 162 |
+
for _ in range(n_samples):
|
| 163 |
+
config = self._sample_from_mixture(window_size, wigner_weight)
|
| 164 |
+
config = config / np.mean(config)
|
| 165 |
+
final_scores.append(self._score_configuration(config))
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
extreme_prob = np.mean(np.array(final_scores) < 0.5)
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
+
self.results = {
|
| 170 |
+
'strategy': 'cross_entropy_rare_event_simulation',
|
| 171 |
+
'n_iterations': n_iterations,
|
| 172 |
+
'n_samples': n_samples,
|
| 173 |
+
'window_size': window_size,
|
| 174 |
+
'iteration_scores': iteration_scores,
|
| 175 |
+
'wigner_weights': wigner_weights,
|
| 176 |
+
'best_configs': best_configs,
|
| 177 |
+
'final_wigner_weight': float(wigner_weight),
|
| 178 |
+
'extreme_non_gue_probability': float(extreme_prob),
|
| 179 |
+
'interpretation': "Low extreme_prob = GUE statistics are stable. High = potential anomalies.",
|
| 180 |
+
}
|
| 181 |
+
return self.results
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
def summary(self) -> str:
|
| 184 |
+
r = self.results
|
| 185 |
+
s = f"Cross-Entropy Rare Event Simulation\n{'='*50}\n"
|
| 186 |
+
s += f"Iterations: {r['n_iterations']}, Samples/iter: {r['n_samples']}\n"
|
| 187 |
+
s += f"Final Wigner weight: {r['final_wigner_weight']:.3f}\n"
|
| 188 |
+
s += f"Elite score progression: {[round(x, 3) for x in r['iteration_scores']]}\n"
|
| 189 |
+
s += f"P(extreme non-GUE config): {r['extreme_non_gue_probability']:.4f}\n"
|
| 190 |
+
s += f"Interpretation: {r['interpretation']}\n"
|
| 191 |
+
if r['extreme_non_gue_probability'] < 0.01:
|
| 192 |
+
s += "→ GUE statistics are HIGHLY stable — consistent with RH.\n"
|
| 193 |
+
return s
|