Add Resep ID Gemma 4 project explainer Space
Browse files- README.md +306 -6
- __pycache__/app.cpython-312.pyc +0 -0
- app.py +145 -0
- requirements.txt +1 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,13 +1,313 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
title: Resep ID Gemma 4
|
| 3 |
-
emoji:
|
| 4 |
-
colorFrom:
|
| 5 |
-
colorTo:
|
| 6 |
sdk: gradio
|
| 7 |
-
sdk_version:
|
| 8 |
-
python_version: '3.13'
|
| 9 |
app_file: app.py
|
| 10 |
pinned: false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
title: Resep ID Gemma 4
|
| 3 |
+
emoji: 🍲
|
| 4 |
+
colorFrom: red
|
| 5 |
+
colorTo: yellow
|
| 6 |
sdk: gradio
|
| 7 |
+
sdk_version: 5.0.0
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
app_file: app.py
|
| 9 |
pinned: false
|
| 10 |
+
license: gemma
|
| 11 |
+
short_description: Gemma 4 Indonesian recipe fine-tune case study
|
| 12 |
+
models:
|
| 13 |
+
- google/gemma-4-e2b-it
|
| 14 |
+
- junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it
|
| 15 |
+
- junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf
|
| 16 |
+
datasets:
|
| 17 |
+
- junwatu/indonesian-recipes
|
| 18 |
+
tags:
|
| 19 |
+
- gemma
|
| 20 |
+
- gemma-4
|
| 21 |
+
- fine-tuning
|
| 22 |
+
- mi300x
|
| 23 |
+
- rocm
|
| 24 |
+
- indonesian
|
| 25 |
+
- recipes
|
| 26 |
+
- gguf
|
| 27 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 28 |
---
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+
# Resep ID Gemma 4
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
This Space explains an end-to-end fine-tuning project: taking `google/gemma-4-e2b-it`, adapting it to Indonesian recipe generation, evaluating the result, quantizing it to GGUF, and deploying it as a lightweight recipe assistant.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
The goal was simple:
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
> Given an Indonesian dish title, generate a structured recipe with `Bahan:` and `Langkah:` in natural Bahasa Indonesia.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Example input:
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
```text
|
| 41 |
+
Tulis resep masakan Indonesia berjudul: "Tumis Kangkung Tempe".
|
| 42 |
+
```
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
Expected output shape:
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
```text
|
| 47 |
+
Bahan:
|
| 48 |
+
- ...
|
| 49 |
+
- ...
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Langkah:
|
| 52 |
+
1. ...
|
| 53 |
+
2. ...
|
| 54 |
+
```
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
## Project Summary
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
| Item | Details |
|
| 59 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 60 |
+
| Base model | `google/gemma-4-e2b-it` |
|
| 61 |
+
| Fine-tuned model | `junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it` |
|
| 62 |
+
| GGUF model | `junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf` |
|
| 63 |
+
| Dataset | `junwatu/indonesian-recipes` |
|
| 64 |
+
| Task | Indonesian recipe generation |
|
| 65 |
+
| Training hardware | AMD Instinct MI300X |
|
| 66 |
+
| GPU memory | 192 GB HBM3 class |
|
| 67 |
+
| Software stack | ROCm 7.2, PyTorch ROCm wheel, Transformers 5.x, TRL 1.x |
|
| 68 |
+
| Training method | Full supervised fine-tune |
|
| 69 |
+
| Training data | 66,419 recipes |
|
| 70 |
+
| Validation data | 1,748 recipes |
|
| 71 |
+
| Held-out test data | 1,748 recipes |
|
| 72 |
+
| Final deployment format | Safetensors + GGUF Q4_K_M / Q8_0 |
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
## Why Fine-Tune?
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
The base Gemma 4 model was already fluent in Indonesian, but it often missed the identity of specific Indonesian dishes.
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
For example, the base model could produce a plausible recipe, but not always the right recipe. It struggled with regional or highly specific dishes such as:
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
- Sosis Solo
|
| 81 |
+
- Tahu Thek
|
| 82 |
+
- Tempe Mendoan
|
| 83 |
+
- Tahu Walik Aci
|
| 84 |
+
- Kering Tempe Pete
|
| 85 |
+
- DEBM / MPASI recipe variants
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
A baseline evaluation on 50 held-out recipes showed the main gap:
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
| Dimension | Base Gemma 4 E2B |
|
| 90 |
+
|---|---:|
|
| 91 |
+
| Language fidelity | 5.00 |
|
| 92 |
+
| Format compliance | 3.90 |
|
| 93 |
+
| Ingredient plausibility | 3.10 |
|
| 94 |
+
| Step coherence | 3.20 |
|
| 95 |
+
| Dish authenticity | 2.70 |
|
| 96 |
+
| Overall | 3.58 |
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
The key weakness was `dish_authenticity`: the model was fluent, but too often produced a generic Indonesian recipe instead of the requested dish.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
## Dataset
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
The dataset contains structured Indonesian home-cooking recipes.
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
Each row has:
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
| Field | Description |
|
| 107 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 108 |
+
| `title` | Recipe name |
|
| 109 |
+
| `ingredients` | List of ingredient lines |
|
| 110 |
+
| `steps` | Ordered cooking steps |
|
| 111 |
+
| `num_ingredients` | Ingredient count |
|
| 112 |
+
| `num_steps` | Step count |
|
| 113 |
+
| `char_count` | Approximate recipe length |
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
The project converts the original parquet files into JSONL splits:
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
```text
|
| 118 |
+
data/processed/train.jsonl
|
| 119 |
+
data/processed/val.jsonl
|
| 120 |
+
data/processed/test.jsonl
|
| 121 |
+
```
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
The held-out test split is not used for training. It is used only for pre/post fine-tune comparison.
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
## Training Setup
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
The fine-tune used a single AMD MI300X GPU on ROCm 7.2.
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
Important training choices:
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
- Full fine-tune instead of LoRA
|
| 132 |
+
- bf16 training
|
| 133 |
+
- 1 epoch
|
| 134 |
+
- Effective batch size 16
|
| 135 |
+
- Max sequence length 2048
|
| 136 |
+
- Cosine learning-rate schedule
|
| 137 |
+
- 3% warmup
|
| 138 |
+
- Gradient checkpointing enabled
|
| 139 |
+
- Vision/audio paths frozen because this task is text-only
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
Gemma 4 is multimodal, but this project trains only the text path:
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
```text
|
| 144 |
+
Train:
|
| 145 |
+
- model.language_model.*
|
| 146 |
+
- lm_head
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
Freeze:
|
| 149 |
+
- vision tower
|
| 150 |
+
- audio tower
|
| 151 |
+
- vision/audio adapters
|
| 152 |
+
```
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
## Training Format
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
The project uses TRL prompt/completion conversational format:
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
```json
|
| 159 |
+
{
|
| 160 |
+
"prompt": [
|
| 161 |
+
{
|
| 162 |
+
"role": "user",
|
| 163 |
+
"content": "Tulis resep masakan Indonesia berjudul: \"Tumis Kangkung Tempe\"..."
|
| 164 |
+
}
|
| 165 |
+
],
|
| 166 |
+
"completion": [
|
| 167 |
+
{
|
| 168 |
+
"role": "assistant",
|
| 169 |
+
"content": "Bahan:\n- ...\n\nLangkah:\n1. ..."
|
| 170 |
+
}
|
| 171 |
+
]
|
| 172 |
+
}
|
| 173 |
+
```
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
This format was important. In this stack, the alternative `messages` format with `assistant_only_loss=True` caused unstable loss behavior.
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
## Results
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
The fine-tuned model improved the practical recipe-generation behavior.
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
| Dimension | Base | Fine-tuned |
|
| 182 |
+
|---|---:|---:|
|
| 183 |
+
| Language fidelity | 5.00 | ~4.6 |
|
| 184 |
+
| Format compliance | 3.90 | ~4.95 |
|
| 185 |
+
| Ingredient plausibility | 3.10 | ~3.5 |
|
| 186 |
+
| Step coherence | 3.20 | ~3.9 |
|
| 187 |
+
| Dish authenticity | 2.70 | ~3.25 |
|
| 188 |
+
| Overall | 3.58 | ~4.0 |
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
The strongest gains were:
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
- More consistent `Bahan:` / `Langkah:` formatting
|
| 193 |
+
- Better recipe length discipline
|
| 194 |
+
- More natural Indonesian cooking vocabulary
|
| 195 |
+
- Better common-dish ingredient profiles
|
| 196 |
+
- Better structure for common dishes like tumis, pepes, rendang, sambal, and gulai
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
## Critical Inference Setting
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
One important lesson from the project: the fine-tuned model needs repetition control.
|
| 201 |
+
|
| 202 |
+
For Hugging Face Transformers inference, use:
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
```python
|
| 205 |
+
model.generate(
|
| 206 |
+
**inputs,
|
| 207 |
+
max_new_tokens=1280,
|
| 208 |
+
do_sample=False,
|
| 209 |
+
repetition_penalty=1.05,
|
| 210 |
+
no_repeat_ngram_size=6,
|
| 211 |
+
pad_token_id=tok.eos_token_id,
|
| 212 |
+
)
|
| 213 |
+
```
|
| 214 |
+
|
| 215 |
+
Without `no_repeat_ngram_size=6`, long recipes can fall into repeated ingredient-list loops.
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
For GGUF runtimes such as llama.cpp or LM Studio, use the DRY sampler equivalent with allowed length around 6.
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
## GGUF Deployment
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
The model was also converted to GGUF for local and CPU-friendly use.
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
Available quantizations:
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
| Quant | Approx. size | Use case |
|
| 226 |
+
|---|---:|---|
|
| 227 |
+
| Q4_K_M | ~3.2 GB | Default portable version |
|
| 228 |
+
| Q8_0 | ~4.7 GB | Higher quality, more RAM |
|
| 229 |
+
|
| 230 |
+
The GGUF model can run with llama.cpp, LM Studio, or other GGUF-compatible runtimes.
|
| 231 |
+
|
| 232 |
+
## What Worked
|
| 233 |
+
|
| 234 |
+
The project worked well for:
|
| 235 |
+
|
| 236 |
+
- Common Indonesian home-cooking recipes
|
| 237 |
+
- Structured recipe generation
|
| 238 |
+
- Concise recipe output
|
| 239 |
+
- Natural Indonesian recipe phrasing
|
| 240 |
+
- Common ingredients and cooking methods
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
Examples of stronger categories:
|
| 243 |
+
|
| 244 |
+
- Ayam
|
| 245 |
+
- Ikan
|
| 246 |
+
- Sapi
|
| 247 |
+
- Kambing
|
| 248 |
+
- Tahu
|
| 249 |
+
- Tempe
|
| 250 |
+
- Telur
|
| 251 |
+
- Udang
|
| 252 |
+
- Sambal
|
| 253 |
+
- Tumis
|
| 254 |
+
- Pepes
|
| 255 |
+
- Rendang-style dishes
|
| 256 |
+
|
| 257 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
This is not a perfect cookbook model.
|
| 260 |
+
|
| 261 |
+
Known limitations:
|
| 262 |
+
|
| 263 |
+
- Rare regional dishes can become generic.
|
| 264 |
+
- Some defining ingredients may be omitted.
|
| 265 |
+
- Diet or modifier terms such as MPASI, DEBM, basah, or kering may be ignored.
|
| 266 |
+
- The model may produce plausible but not authentic recipes.
|
| 267 |
+
- Some outputs may contain minor formatting or fraction glitches.
|
| 268 |
+
- Recipes should be checked before cooking.
|
| 269 |
+
|
| 270 |
+
The main remaining bottleneck is dataset coverage, especially for regional and specialty dishes.
|
| 271 |
+
|
| 272 |
+
## Lessons Learned
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
The biggest technical lessons:
|
| 275 |
+
|
| 276 |
+
1. Use the native ROCm 7.2 PyTorch wheel on MI300X.
|
| 277 |
+
2. Avoid older ROCm wheels for this Gemma 4 bf16 training path.
|
| 278 |
+
3. Use prompt/completion format with TRL for this stack.
|
| 279 |
+
4. Always run a cheap quick-validation training pass before a full run.
|
| 280 |
+
5. Judge the base model before fine-tuning.
|
| 281 |
+
6. Automatic metrics are not enough for recipe quality.
|
| 282 |
+
7. `no_repeat_ngram_size=6` is critical for stable inference.
|
| 283 |
+
8. Dataset coverage matters more than another epoch for rare dishes.
|
| 284 |
+
|
| 285 |
+
## Cost and Runtime
|
| 286 |
+
|
| 287 |
+
The full successful cycle was inexpensive because MI300X training was fast for this model size.
|
| 288 |
+
|
| 289 |
+
Approximate reference run:
|
| 290 |
+
|
| 291 |
+
| Phase | Approx. cost |
|
| 292 |
+
|---|---:|
|
| 293 |
+
| Setup and debugging | ~$2.50 |
|
| 294 |
+
| Quick validation | ~$1.50 |
|
| 295 |
+
| Full training | ~$3.00 |
|
| 296 |
+
| Evaluation iterations | ~$2.00 |
|
| 297 |
+
| GGUF conversion and upload | ~$1.30 |
|
| 298 |
+
| Idle/debugging slack | ~$4.00 |
|
| 299 |
+
| Total | ~$14 |
|
| 300 |
+
|
| 301 |
+
Future cycles should be cheaper because the stack and gotchas are now documented.
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
## Links
|
| 304 |
+
|
| 305 |
+
- Base model: [`google/gemma-4-e2b-it`](https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-e2b-it)
|
| 306 |
+
- Fine-tuned model: [`junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it`](https://huggingface.co/junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it)
|
| 307 |
+
- GGUF model: [`junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf`](https://huggingface.co/junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf)
|
| 308 |
+
- Dataset: [`junwatu/indonesian-recipes`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/junwatu/indonesian-recipes)
|
| 309 |
+
- Live recipe demo: [`junwatu/koki-ai`](https://huggingface.co/spaces/junwatu/koki-ai)
|
| 310 |
+
|
| 311 |
+
## License
|
| 312 |
+
|
| 313 |
+
This project inherits the Gemma Terms of Use from the base model.
|
__pycache__/app.cpython-312.pyc
ADDED
|
Binary file (5.69 kB). View file
|
|
|
app.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from __future__ import annotations
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
import gradio as gr
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
OVERVIEW = """
|
| 7 |
+
# MI300X Gemma 4 Indonesian Recipe Fine-Tune
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
This Space explains an end-to-end fine-tuning project: taking `google/gemma-4-e2b-it`,
|
| 10 |
+
adapting it to Indonesian recipe generation, evaluating the result, quantizing it to
|
| 11 |
+
GGUF, and deploying it as a lightweight recipe assistant.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
The task is simple: given an Indonesian dish title, generate a structured recipe with
|
| 14 |
+
`Bahan:` and `Langkah:` in natural Bahasa Indonesia.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
| Item | Details |
|
| 17 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 18 |
+
| Base model | `google/gemma-4-e2b-it` |
|
| 19 |
+
| Fine-tuned model | `junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it` |
|
| 20 |
+
| GGUF model | `junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf` |
|
| 21 |
+
| Dataset | `junwatu/indonesian-recipes` |
|
| 22 |
+
| Training hardware | AMD Instinct MI300X |
|
| 23 |
+
| Training method | Full supervised fine-tune |
|
| 24 |
+
"""
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
DATASET = """
|
| 27 |
+
## Dataset
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
The dataset contains structured Indonesian home-cooking recipes with `title`,
|
| 30 |
+
`ingredients`, and `steps`.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
| Split | Count | Use |
|
| 33 |
+
|---|---:|---|
|
| 34 |
+
| Train | 66,419 | Fine-tuning |
|
| 35 |
+
| Validation | 1,748 | Eval loss during training |
|
| 36 |
+
| Test | 1,748 | Held-out pre/post evaluation |
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
The held-out test split is not used for training. It is reserved for comparing the
|
| 39 |
+
base model and fine-tuned model on the same examples.
|
| 40 |
+
"""
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
TRAINING = """
|
| 43 |
+
## Training Setup
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
The fine-tune used a single AMD MI300X GPU on ROCm 7.2.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
- Full fine-tune instead of LoRA
|
| 48 |
+
- bf16 training
|
| 49 |
+
- 1 epoch
|
| 50 |
+
- Effective batch size 16
|
| 51 |
+
- Max sequence length 2048
|
| 52 |
+
- Cosine learning-rate schedule
|
| 53 |
+
- 3% warmup
|
| 54 |
+
- Gradient checkpointing enabled
|
| 55 |
+
- Vision/audio paths frozen because this task is text-only
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
The project uses TRL prompt/completion conversational format. This avoided the
|
| 58 |
+
unstable loss behavior seen with the `messages + assistant_only_loss=True` path
|
| 59 |
+
in this stack.
|
| 60 |
+
"""
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
EVALUATION = """
|
| 63 |
+
## Evaluation Results
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
The base model was fluent in Indonesian, but weak on dish authenticity. The
|
| 66 |
+
fine-tuned model improved practical recipe behavior.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
| Dimension | Base | Fine-tuned |
|
| 69 |
+
|---|---:|---:|
|
| 70 |
+
| Language fidelity | 5.00 | ~4.6 |
|
| 71 |
+
| Format compliance | 3.90 | ~4.95 |
|
| 72 |
+
| Ingredient plausibility | 3.10 | ~3.5 |
|
| 73 |
+
| Step coherence | 3.20 | ~3.9 |
|
| 74 |
+
| Dish authenticity | 2.70 | ~3.25 |
|
| 75 |
+
| Overall | 3.58 | ~4.0 |
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
The strongest gains were format consistency, length discipline, natural Indonesian
|
| 78 |
+
cooking vocabulary, and better common-dish ingredient profiles.
|
| 79 |
+
"""
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
DEPLOYMENT = """
|
| 82 |
+
## Deployment
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
The model was shipped as both safetensors and GGUF.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
| Quant | Approx. size | Use case |
|
| 87 |
+
|---|---:|---|
|
| 88 |
+
| Q4_K_M | ~3.2 GB | Default portable version |
|
| 89 |
+
| Q8_0 | ~4.7 GB | Higher quality, more RAM |
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
For Hugging Face Transformers inference, the critical generation setting is:
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
```python
|
| 94 |
+
no_repeat_ngram_size=6
|
| 95 |
+
```
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
Without it, long recipes can fall into repeated ingredient-list loops. For GGUF
|
| 98 |
+
runtimes such as llama.cpp or LM Studio, use the DRY sampler equivalent with
|
| 99 |
+
allowed length around 6.
|
| 100 |
+
"""
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
LESSONS = """
|
| 103 |
+
## Lessons Learned
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
1. Use the native ROCm 7.2 PyTorch wheel on MI300X.
|
| 106 |
+
2. Avoid older ROCm wheels for this Gemma 4 bf16 training path.
|
| 107 |
+
3. Use prompt/completion format with TRL for this stack.
|
| 108 |
+
4. Always run a cheap quick-validation training pass before a full run.
|
| 109 |
+
5. Judge the base model before fine-tuning.
|
| 110 |
+
6. Automatic metrics are not enough for recipe quality.
|
| 111 |
+
7. `no_repeat_ngram_size=6` is critical for stable inference.
|
| 112 |
+
8. Dataset coverage matters more than another epoch for rare dishes.
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
## Links
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
- Base model: https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-e2b-it
|
| 117 |
+
- Fine-tuned model: https://huggingface.co/junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it
|
| 118 |
+
- GGUF model: https://huggingface.co/junwatu/resep-ID-gemma-4-E2B-it-gguf
|
| 119 |
+
- Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/junwatu/indonesian-recipes
|
| 120 |
+
- Live recipe demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/junwatu/koki-ai
|
| 121 |
+
"""
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
with gr.Blocks(title="Resep ID Gemma 4") as demo:
|
| 125 |
+
gr.Markdown("# Resep ID Gemma 4")
|
| 126 |
+
gr.Markdown(
|
| 127 |
+
"A compact case study on fine-tuning Gemma 4 for Indonesian recipe generation."
|
| 128 |
+
)
|
| 129 |
+
with gr.Tabs():
|
| 130 |
+
with gr.Tab("Overview"):
|
| 131 |
+
gr.Markdown(OVERVIEW)
|
| 132 |
+
with gr.Tab("Dataset"):
|
| 133 |
+
gr.Markdown(DATASET)
|
| 134 |
+
with gr.Tab("Training"):
|
| 135 |
+
gr.Markdown(TRAINING)
|
| 136 |
+
with gr.Tab("Evaluation"):
|
| 137 |
+
gr.Markdown(EVALUATION)
|
| 138 |
+
with gr.Tab("Deployment"):
|
| 139 |
+
gr.Markdown(DEPLOYMENT)
|
| 140 |
+
with gr.Tab("Lessons"):
|
| 141 |
+
gr.Markdown(LESSONS)
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
| 145 |
+
demo.launch()
|
requirements.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
gradio>=5.0
|