Spaces:
Paused
Paused
Upload immunoorg/llm_adversary.py with huggingface_hub
Browse files- immunoorg/llm_adversary.py +343 -343
immunoorg/llm_adversary.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,343 +1,343 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""
|
| 2 |
-
LLM-Driven Adversary Engine
|
| 3 |
-
===========================
|
| 4 |
-
ImmunoOrg 2.0 - Phase 1: Adversarial Evolution
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
Upgrades the AttackEngine from template-based attacks to a reasoning-based adversary
|
| 7 |
-
that analyzes the network graph and adapts strategy based on observed defender actions.
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
The LLM adversary:
|
| 10 |
-
- Analyzes the network topology to identify crown jewels (data, management nodes)
|
| 11 |
-
- Plans multi-stage attack paths considering node compromise status
|
| 12 |
-
- Adapts tactics based on defender response patterns
|
| 13 |
-
- Generates novel attack combinations not in fixed templates
|
| 14 |
-
"""
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
from __future__ import annotations
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
import random
|
| 19 |
-
import json
|
| 20 |
-
from typing import Any
|
| 21 |
-
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
from immunoorg.models import (
|
| 24 |
-
Attack, AttackVector, NetworkNode,
|
| 25 |
-
)
|
| 26 |
-
from immunoorg.network_graph import NetworkGraph
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
@dataclass
|
| 30 |
-
class AttackPlan:
|
| 31 |
-
"""A reasoned multi-stage attack plan."""
|
| 32 |
-
attack_id: str
|
| 33 |
-
primary_vector: AttackVector
|
| 34 |
-
target_path: list[str] # Chain of nodes to compromise
|
| 35 |
-
estimated_success_rate: float
|
| 36 |
-
stages: list[dict[str, Any]] # Multi-stage breakdown
|
| 37 |
-
rationale: str # Why this plan is effective
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
class LLMAdversaryReasoner:
|
| 41 |
-
"""
|
| 42 |
-
Simulates an LLM-driven adversary that reasons about network topology
|
| 43 |
-
and generates adaptive attack plans.
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
This is a *simulated* LLM (using heuristics) rather than calling
|
| 46 |
-
a real LLM API, to keep the environment fast and deterministic.
|
| 47 |
-
"""
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
def __init__(self, network: NetworkGraph, seed: int | None = None):
|
| 50 |
-
self.network = network
|
| 51 |
-
self.rng = random.Random(seed)
|
| 52 |
-
self.attack_history: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
| 53 |
-
self.observed_defenses: list[str] = []
|
| 54 |
-
self.last_planned_attacks: list[AttackPlan] = []
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
def identify_high_value_targets(self) -> list[NetworkNode]:
|
| 57 |
-
"""
|
| 58 |
-
Identify the crown jewels in the network.
|
| 59 |
-
High-value = data nodes, management nodes, high-criticality services.
|
| 60 |
-
"""
|
| 61 |
-
nodes = self.network.get_all_nodes()
|
| 62 |
-
scored = []
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
for node in nodes:
|
| 65 |
-
score = 0.0
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
# Data tier is most valuable
|
| 68 |
-
if node.tier == "data":
|
| 69 |
-
score += 0.9
|
| 70 |
-
# Management/control is also valuable
|
| 71 |
-
elif node.tier == "management":
|
| 72 |
-
score += 0.8
|
| 73 |
-
# Compromised nodes are less valuable
|
| 74 |
-
elif node.compromised:
|
| 75 |
-
score -= 0.5
|
| 76 |
-
# Isolated nodes are hard to reach
|
| 77 |
-
elif node.isolated:
|
| 78 |
-
score -= 0.3
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
# Add service criticality
|
| 81 |
-
critical_services = ["database", "auth", "admin", "backup"]
|
| 82 |
-
for service in node.ports:
|
| 83 |
-
if any(crit in service.service.lower() for crit in critical_services):
|
| 84 |
-
score += 0.2
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
scored.append((node, score))
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
# Sort by score, return top targets
|
| 89 |
-
scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
|
| 90 |
-
return [node for node, score in scored if score > 0][:5]
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
def plan_attack_path(self, target: NetworkNode) -> list[str]:
|
| 93 |
-
"""
|
| 94 |
-
Plan an efficient path from external entry point to target.
|
| 95 |
-
Considers already-compromised nodes as jumping points.
|
| 96 |
-
"""
|
| 97 |
-
nodes = self.network.get_all_nodes()
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
# Find compromised nodes (already in network)
|
| 100 |
-
compromised = [n for n in nodes if n.compromised]
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
# If we have compromised nodes, try to use them
|
| 103 |
-
if compromised:
|
| 104 |
-
closest = min(compromised, key=lambda n: abs(hash(n.tier) - hash(target.tier)))
|
| 105 |
-
return [closest.id, target.id]
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
# Otherwise, find entry point based on tier proximity
|
| 108 |
-
dmz_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n.tier == "dmz" and not n.isolated]
|
| 109 |
-
if dmz_nodes and target.tier != "dmz":
|
| 110 |
-
entry = self.rng.choice(dmz_nodes)
|
| 111 |
-
return [entry.id, target.id]
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
return [target.id]
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
def generate_attack_plan(
|
| 116 |
-
self,
|
| 117 |
-
difficulty: int,
|
| 118 |
-
observed_defenses: list[str] | None = None,
|
| 119 |
-
) -> AttackPlan:
|
| 120 |
-
"""
|
| 121 |
-
Generate a multi-stage attack plan based on network analysis.
|
| 122 |
-
Adapts to observed defender patterns.
|
| 123 |
-
"""
|
| 124 |
-
observed_defenses = observed_defenses or []
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
# Identify targets
|
| 127 |
-
targets = self.identify_high_value_targets()
|
| 128 |
-
if not targets:
|
| 129 |
-
# Fallback: any available node
|
| 130 |
-
targets = [self.network.get_all_nodes()[0]] if self.network.get_all_nodes() else []
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
if not targets:
|
| 133 |
-
raise ValueError("No targets available in network")
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
primary_target = targets[0]
|
| 136 |
-
attack_path = self.plan_attack_path(primary_target)
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
# Adapt vector based on observed defenses
|
| 139 |
-
vector = self._select_vector_against_defenses(observed_defenses, difficulty)
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
# Build multi-stage plan
|
| 142 |
-
stages = self._plan_stages(vector, attack_path, difficulty)
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
# Estimate success
|
| 145 |
-
success_rate = self._estimate_success(vector, attack_path, observed_defenses)
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
plan = AttackPlan(
|
| 148 |
-
attack_id=f"plan-{self.rng.randint(10000, 99999)}",
|
| 149 |
-
primary_vector=vector,
|
| 150 |
-
target_path=attack_path,
|
| 151 |
-
estimated_success_rate=success_rate,
|
| 152 |
-
stages=stages,
|
| 153 |
-
rationale=self._generate_rationale(vector, attack_path, observed_defenses),
|
| 154 |
-
)
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
self.last_planned_attacks.append(plan)
|
| 157 |
-
return plan
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
def _select_vector_against_defenses(self, observed_defenses: list[str], difficulty: int) -> AttackVector:
|
| 160 |
-
"""
|
| 161 |
-
Choose attack vector that exploits gaps in observed defenses.
|
| 162 |
-
If defender is blocking ports, use credential attacks.
|
| 163 |
-
If defender is isolating nodes, use lateral movement.
|
| 164 |
-
"""
|
| 165 |
-
defense_counter = {
|
| 166 |
-
"block_port": [AttackVector.CREDENTIAL_STUFFING, AttackVector.PHISHING, AttackVector.SUPPLY_CHAIN],
|
| 167 |
-
"isolate_node": [AttackVector.LATERAL_MOVEMENT, AttackVector.PRIVILEGE_ESCALATION],
|
| 168 |
-
"deploy_ids": [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR, AttackVector.ZERO_DAY],
|
| 169 |
-
"rotate_credentials": [AttackVector.RANSOMWARE, AttackVector.DDOS],
|
| 170 |
-
}
|
| 171 |
-
|
| 172 |
-
# If we've seen specific defenses, exploit gaps
|
| 173 |
-
for defense in observed_defenses:
|
| 174 |
-
if defense in defense_counter:
|
| 175 |
-
return self.rng.choice(defense_counter[defense])
|
| 176 |
-
|
| 177 |
-
# Default: choose vector for difficulty
|
| 178 |
-
vectors_by_difficulty = {
|
| 179 |
-
1: [AttackVector.SQL_INJECTION, AttackVector.XSS],
|
| 180 |
-
2: [AttackVector.LATERAL_MOVEMENT, AttackVector.PRIVILEGE_ESCALATION],
|
| 181 |
-
3: [AttackVector.RANSOMWARE, AttackVector.SUPPLY_CHAIN],
|
| 182 |
-
4: [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR, AttackVector.ZERO_DAY],
|
| 183 |
-
}
|
| 184 |
-
candidates = vectors_by_difficulty.get(difficulty, [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR])
|
| 185 |
-
return self.rng.choice(candidates)
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
def _plan_stages(self, vector: AttackVector, target_path: list[str], difficulty: int) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
|
| 188 |
-
"""
|
| 189 |
-
Break down the attack into stages for multi-step exploitation.
|
| 190 |
-
"""
|
| 191 |
-
stages = []
|
| 192 |
-
|
| 193 |
-
# Stage 1: Reconnaissance
|
| 194 |
-
stages.append({
|
| 195 |
-
"name": "Reconnaissance",
|
| 196 |
-
"description": "Scan target network for vulnerabilities",
|
| 197 |
-
"duration": 1,
|
| 198 |
-
"success_rate": 0.95,
|
| 199 |
-
})
|
| 200 |
-
|
| 201 |
-
# Stage 2: Initial Access
|
| 202 |
-
stages.append({
|
| 203 |
-
"name": "Initial Access",
|
| 204 |
-
"description": f"Exploit {vector.value} to gain initial foothold",
|
| 205 |
-
"duration": 2,
|
| 206 |
-
"success_rate": 0.7 + (difficulty * 0.05),
|
| 207 |
-
"vector": vector.value,
|
| 208 |
-
})
|
| 209 |
-
|
| 210 |
-
# Stage 3: Lateral Movement (if multi-hop path)
|
| 211 |
-
if len(target_path) > 1:
|
| 212 |
-
stages.append({
|
| 213 |
-
"name": "Lateral Movement",
|
| 214 |
-
"description": f"Pivot through {len(target_path) - 1} nodes to reach target",
|
| 215 |
-
"duration": len(target_path),
|
| 216 |
-
"success_rate": 0.6 + (difficulty * 0.08),
|
| 217 |
-
})
|
| 218 |
-
|
| 219 |
-
# Stage 4: Persistence
|
| 220 |
-
if difficulty >= 3:
|
| 221 |
-
stages.append({
|
| 222 |
-
"name": "Persistence",
|
| 223 |
-
"description": "Establish backdoor/C2 channel",
|
| 224 |
-
"duration": 2,
|
| 225 |
-
"success_rate": 0.8,
|
| 226 |
-
})
|
| 227 |
-
|
| 228 |
-
# Stage 5: Exfiltration
|
| 229 |
-
stages.append({
|
| 230 |
-
"name": "Data Exfiltration",
|
| 231 |
-
"description": "Exfiltrate sensitive data",
|
| 232 |
-
"duration": 1,
|
| 233 |
-
"success_rate": 0.5 + (difficulty * 0.1),
|
| 234 |
-
})
|
| 235 |
-
|
| 236 |
-
return stages
|
| 237 |
-
|
| 238 |
-
def _estimate_success(
|
| 239 |
-
self,
|
| 240 |
-
vector: AttackVector,
|
| 241 |
-
target_path: list[str],
|
| 242 |
-
observed_defenses: list[str],
|
| 243 |
-
) -> float:
|
| 244 |
-
"""
|
| 245 |
-
Estimate likelihood of success based on path length and defenses.
|
| 246 |
-
"""
|
| 247 |
-
# Base success: harder with longer paths
|
| 248 |
-
base_success = 0.8 - (len(target_path) * 0.1)
|
| 249 |
-
|
| 250 |
-
# Reduce for observed defenses
|
| 251 |
-
defense_impact = len(observed_defenses) * 0.05
|
| 252 |
-
|
| 253 |
-
return max(0.1, min(1.0, base_success - defense_impact))
|
| 254 |
-
|
| 255 |
-
def _generate_rationale(self, vector: AttackVector, target_path: list[str], observed_defenses: list[str]) -> str:
|
| 256 |
-
"""
|
| 257 |
-
Generate a human-readable explanation of the attack plan.
|
| 258 |
-
"""
|
| 259 |
-
if len(target_path) == 1:
|
| 260 |
-
return f"Direct exploit of {vector.value} on single target. No lateral movement required."
|
| 261 |
-
else:
|
| 262 |
-
hops = " → ".join(target_path)
|
| 263 |
-
return f"Multi-stage attack: {vector.value} followed by lateral movement ({hops}). Observed defenses suggest this vector has lower coverage."
|
| 264 |
-
|
| 265 |
-
def adapt_to_defender_action(self, action: str) -> None:
|
| 266 |
-
"""
|
| 267 |
-
Learn from defender actions to improve future plans.
|
| 268 |
-
"""
|
| 269 |
-
self.observed_defenses.append(action)
|
| 270 |
-
|
| 271 |
-
# Bonus: increase stealth/difficulty of future attacks
|
| 272 |
-
# (This would be reflected in next call to generate_attack_plan)
|
| 273 |
-
|
| 274 |
-
|
| 275 |
-
class LLMAdversary:
|
| 276 |
-
"""
|
| 277 |
-
Wrapper that uses the LLMAdversaryReasoner to generate smarter attacks.
|
| 278 |
-
Maintains compatibility with the original AttackEngine interface.
|
| 279 |
-
"""
|
| 280 |
-
|
| 281 |
-
def __init__(self, network: NetworkGraph, difficulty: int = 1, seed: int | None = None):
|
| 282 |
-
self.network = network
|
| 283 |
-
self.difficulty = difficulty
|
| 284 |
-
self.rng = random.Random(seed)
|
| 285 |
-
self.reasoner = LLMAdversaryReasoner(network, seed)
|
| 286 |
-
self.current_plan: AttackPlan | None = None
|
| 287 |
-
|
| 288 |
-
def generate_next_attack(self, sim_time: float) -> Attack:
|
| 289 |
-
"""
|
| 290 |
-
Generate an attack using the LLM reasoner's plan.
|
| 291 |
-
"""
|
| 292 |
-
# Generate a new plan if we don't have one
|
| 293 |
-
if not self.current_plan:
|
| 294 |
-
try:
|
| 295 |
-
self.current_plan = self.reasoner.generate_attack_plan(
|
| 296 |
-
self.difficulty,
|
| 297 |
-
self.reasoner.observed_defenses,
|
| 298 |
-
)
|
| 299 |
-
except (ValueError, IndexError):
|
| 300 |
-
# Fallback if network is empty
|
| 301 |
-
raise ValueError("Cannot generate attack: empty network")
|
| 302 |
-
|
| 303 |
-
plan = self.current_plan
|
| 304 |
-
target = plan.target_path[-1] if plan.target_path else None
|
| 305 |
-
|
| 306 |
-
attack = Attack(
|
| 307 |
-
vector=plan.primary_vector,
|
| 308 |
-
source_node="external",
|
| 309 |
-
target_node=target or "",
|
| 310 |
-
entry_point=f"{plan.primary_vector.value}",
|
| 311 |
-
severity=min(1.0, 0.4 + (self.difficulty * 0.15)),
|
| 312 |
-
started_at=sim_time,
|
| 313 |
-
stealth=min(1.0, 0.3 + (self.difficulty * 0.15)),
|
| 314 |
-
lateral_path=plan.target_path,
|
| 315 |
-
metadata={
|
| 316 |
-
"plan_id": plan.attack_id,
|
| 317 |
-
"rationale": plan.rationale,
|
| 318 |
-
"success_probability": plan.estimated_success_rate,
|
| 319 |
-
"stages": [s["name"] for s in plan.stages],
|
| 320 |
-
}
|
| 321 |
-
)
|
| 322 |
-
|
| 323 |
-
# Clear plan so next call generates a new one
|
| 324 |
-
self.current_plan = None
|
| 325 |
-
|
| 326 |
-
return attack
|
| 327 |
-
|
| 328 |
-
def observe_defender_action(self, action: str) -> None:
|
| 329 |
-
"""
|
| 330 |
-
Record defender action for adaptation.
|
| 331 |
-
"""
|
| 332 |
-
self.reasoner.adapt_to_defender_action(action)
|
| 333 |
-
|
| 334 |
-
def get_attack_rationale(self) -> str:
|
| 335 |
-
"""
|
| 336 |
-
Get the reasoning behind the current/last attack plan.
|
| 337 |
-
Useful for debugging and analysis.
|
| 338 |
-
"""
|
| 339 |
-
if self.current_plan:
|
| 340 |
-
return self.current_plan.rationale
|
| 341 |
-
elif self.reasoner.last_planned_attacks:
|
| 342 |
-
return self.reasoner.last_planned_attacks[-1].rationale
|
| 343 |
-
return "No attack plan generated yet"
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""
|
| 2 |
+
LLM-Driven Adversary Engine
|
| 3 |
+
===========================
|
| 4 |
+
ImmunoOrg 2.0 - Phase 1: Adversarial Evolution
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
Upgrades the AttackEngine from template-based attacks to a reasoning-based adversary
|
| 7 |
+
that analyzes the network graph and adapts strategy based on observed defender actions.
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
The LLM adversary:
|
| 10 |
+
- Analyzes the network topology to identify crown jewels (data, management nodes)
|
| 11 |
+
- Plans multi-stage attack paths considering node compromise status
|
| 12 |
+
- Adapts tactics based on defender response patterns
|
| 13 |
+
- Generates novel attack combinations not in fixed templates
|
| 14 |
+
"""
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
from __future__ import annotations
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
import random
|
| 19 |
+
import json
|
| 20 |
+
from typing import Any
|
| 21 |
+
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
from immunoorg.models import (
|
| 24 |
+
Attack, AttackVector, NetworkNode,
|
| 25 |
+
)
|
| 26 |
+
from immunoorg.network_graph import NetworkGraph
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
@dataclass
|
| 30 |
+
class AttackPlan:
|
| 31 |
+
"""A reasoned multi-stage attack plan."""
|
| 32 |
+
attack_id: str
|
| 33 |
+
primary_vector: AttackVector
|
| 34 |
+
target_path: list[str] # Chain of nodes to compromise
|
| 35 |
+
estimated_success_rate: float
|
| 36 |
+
stages: list[dict[str, Any]] # Multi-stage breakdown
|
| 37 |
+
rationale: str # Why this plan is effective
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
class LLMAdversaryReasoner:
|
| 41 |
+
"""
|
| 42 |
+
Simulates an LLM-driven adversary that reasons about network topology
|
| 43 |
+
and generates adaptive attack plans.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
This is a *simulated* LLM (using heuristics) rather than calling
|
| 46 |
+
a real LLM API, to keep the environment fast and deterministic.
|
| 47 |
+
"""
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
def __init__(self, network: NetworkGraph, seed: int | None = None):
|
| 50 |
+
self.network = network
|
| 51 |
+
self.rng = random.Random(seed)
|
| 52 |
+
self.attack_history: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
|
| 53 |
+
self.observed_defenses: list[str] = []
|
| 54 |
+
self.last_planned_attacks: list[AttackPlan] = []
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
def identify_high_value_targets(self) -> list[NetworkNode]:
|
| 57 |
+
"""
|
| 58 |
+
Identify the crown jewels in the network.
|
| 59 |
+
High-value = data nodes, management nodes, high-criticality services.
|
| 60 |
+
"""
|
| 61 |
+
nodes = self.network.get_all_nodes()
|
| 62 |
+
scored = []
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
for node in nodes:
|
| 65 |
+
score = 0.0
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
# Data tier is most valuable
|
| 68 |
+
if node.tier == "data":
|
| 69 |
+
score += 0.9
|
| 70 |
+
# Management/control is also valuable
|
| 71 |
+
elif node.tier == "management":
|
| 72 |
+
score += 0.8
|
| 73 |
+
# Compromised nodes are less valuable
|
| 74 |
+
elif node.compromised:
|
| 75 |
+
score -= 0.5
|
| 76 |
+
# Isolated nodes are hard to reach
|
| 77 |
+
elif node.isolated:
|
| 78 |
+
score -= 0.3
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
# Add service criticality
|
| 81 |
+
critical_services = ["database", "auth", "admin", "backup"]
|
| 82 |
+
for service in node.ports:
|
| 83 |
+
if any(crit in service.service.lower() for crit in critical_services):
|
| 84 |
+
score += 0.2
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
scored.append((node, score))
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
# Sort by score, return top targets
|
| 89 |
+
scored.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
|
| 90 |
+
return [node for node, score in scored if score > 0][:5]
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
def plan_attack_path(self, target: NetworkNode) -> list[str]:
|
| 93 |
+
"""
|
| 94 |
+
Plan an efficient path from external entry point to target.
|
| 95 |
+
Considers already-compromised nodes as jumping points.
|
| 96 |
+
"""
|
| 97 |
+
nodes = self.network.get_all_nodes()
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
# Find compromised nodes (already in network)
|
| 100 |
+
compromised = [n for n in nodes if n.compromised]
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
# If we have compromised nodes, try to use them
|
| 103 |
+
if compromised:
|
| 104 |
+
closest = min(compromised, key=lambda n: abs(hash(n.tier) - hash(target.tier)))
|
| 105 |
+
return [closest.id, target.id]
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
# Otherwise, find entry point based on tier proximity
|
| 108 |
+
dmz_nodes = [n for n in nodes if n.tier == "dmz" and not n.isolated]
|
| 109 |
+
if dmz_nodes and target.tier != "dmz":
|
| 110 |
+
entry = self.rng.choice(dmz_nodes)
|
| 111 |
+
return [entry.id, target.id]
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
return [target.id]
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
def generate_attack_plan(
|
| 116 |
+
self,
|
| 117 |
+
difficulty: int,
|
| 118 |
+
observed_defenses: list[str] | None = None,
|
| 119 |
+
) -> AttackPlan:
|
| 120 |
+
"""
|
| 121 |
+
Generate a multi-stage attack plan based on network analysis.
|
| 122 |
+
Adapts to observed defender patterns.
|
| 123 |
+
"""
|
| 124 |
+
observed_defenses = observed_defenses or []
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
# Identify targets
|
| 127 |
+
targets = self.identify_high_value_targets()
|
| 128 |
+
if not targets:
|
| 129 |
+
# Fallback: any available node
|
| 130 |
+
targets = [self.network.get_all_nodes()[0]] if self.network.get_all_nodes() else []
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
if not targets:
|
| 133 |
+
raise ValueError("No targets available in network")
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
primary_target = targets[0]
|
| 136 |
+
attack_path = self.plan_attack_path(primary_target)
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
# Adapt vector based on observed defenses
|
| 139 |
+
vector = self._select_vector_against_defenses(observed_defenses, difficulty)
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
# Build multi-stage plan
|
| 142 |
+
stages = self._plan_stages(vector, attack_path, difficulty)
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
# Estimate success
|
| 145 |
+
success_rate = self._estimate_success(vector, attack_path, observed_defenses)
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
plan = AttackPlan(
|
| 148 |
+
attack_id=f"plan-{self.rng.randint(10000, 99999)}",
|
| 149 |
+
primary_vector=vector,
|
| 150 |
+
target_path=attack_path,
|
| 151 |
+
estimated_success_rate=success_rate,
|
| 152 |
+
stages=stages,
|
| 153 |
+
rationale=self._generate_rationale(vector, attack_path, observed_defenses),
|
| 154 |
+
)
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
self.last_planned_attacks.append(plan)
|
| 157 |
+
return plan
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
def _select_vector_against_defenses(self, observed_defenses: list[str], difficulty: int) -> AttackVector:
|
| 160 |
+
"""
|
| 161 |
+
Choose attack vector that exploits gaps in observed defenses.
|
| 162 |
+
If defender is blocking ports, use credential attacks.
|
| 163 |
+
If defender is isolating nodes, use lateral movement.
|
| 164 |
+
"""
|
| 165 |
+
defense_counter = {
|
| 166 |
+
"block_port": [AttackVector.CREDENTIAL_STUFFING, AttackVector.PHISHING, AttackVector.SUPPLY_CHAIN],
|
| 167 |
+
"isolate_node": [AttackVector.LATERAL_MOVEMENT, AttackVector.PRIVILEGE_ESCALATION],
|
| 168 |
+
"deploy_ids": [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR, AttackVector.ZERO_DAY],
|
| 169 |
+
"rotate_credentials": [AttackVector.RANSOMWARE, AttackVector.DDOS],
|
| 170 |
+
}
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
# If we've seen specific defenses, exploit gaps
|
| 173 |
+
for defense in observed_defenses:
|
| 174 |
+
if defense in defense_counter:
|
| 175 |
+
return self.rng.choice(defense_counter[defense])
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
# Default: choose vector for difficulty
|
| 178 |
+
vectors_by_difficulty = {
|
| 179 |
+
1: [AttackVector.SQL_INJECTION, AttackVector.XSS],
|
| 180 |
+
2: [AttackVector.LATERAL_MOVEMENT, AttackVector.PRIVILEGE_ESCALATION],
|
| 181 |
+
3: [AttackVector.RANSOMWARE, AttackVector.SUPPLY_CHAIN],
|
| 182 |
+
4: [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR, AttackVector.ZERO_DAY],
|
| 183 |
+
}
|
| 184 |
+
candidates = vectors_by_difficulty.get(difficulty, [AttackVector.APT_BACKDOOR])
|
| 185 |
+
return self.rng.choice(candidates)
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
def _plan_stages(self, vector: AttackVector, target_path: list[str], difficulty: int) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
|
| 188 |
+
"""
|
| 189 |
+
Break down the attack into stages for multi-step exploitation.
|
| 190 |
+
"""
|
| 191 |
+
stages = []
|
| 192 |
+
|
| 193 |
+
# Stage 1: Reconnaissance
|
| 194 |
+
stages.append({
|
| 195 |
+
"name": "Reconnaissance",
|
| 196 |
+
"description": "Scan target network for vulnerabilities",
|
| 197 |
+
"duration": 1,
|
| 198 |
+
"success_rate": 0.95,
|
| 199 |
+
})
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
# Stage 2: Initial Access
|
| 202 |
+
stages.append({
|
| 203 |
+
"name": "Initial Access",
|
| 204 |
+
"description": f"Exploit {vector.value} to gain initial foothold",
|
| 205 |
+
"duration": 2,
|
| 206 |
+
"success_rate": 0.7 + (difficulty * 0.05),
|
| 207 |
+
"vector": vector.value,
|
| 208 |
+
})
|
| 209 |
+
|
| 210 |
+
# Stage 3: Lateral Movement (if multi-hop path)
|
| 211 |
+
if len(target_path) > 1:
|
| 212 |
+
stages.append({
|
| 213 |
+
"name": "Lateral Movement",
|
| 214 |
+
"description": f"Pivot through {len(target_path) - 1} nodes to reach target",
|
| 215 |
+
"duration": len(target_path),
|
| 216 |
+
"success_rate": 0.6 + (difficulty * 0.08),
|
| 217 |
+
})
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
# Stage 4: Persistence
|
| 220 |
+
if difficulty >= 3:
|
| 221 |
+
stages.append({
|
| 222 |
+
"name": "Persistence",
|
| 223 |
+
"description": "Establish backdoor/C2 channel",
|
| 224 |
+
"duration": 2,
|
| 225 |
+
"success_rate": 0.8,
|
| 226 |
+
})
|
| 227 |
+
|
| 228 |
+
# Stage 5: Exfiltration
|
| 229 |
+
stages.append({
|
| 230 |
+
"name": "Data Exfiltration",
|
| 231 |
+
"description": "Exfiltrate sensitive data",
|
| 232 |
+
"duration": 1,
|
| 233 |
+
"success_rate": 0.5 + (difficulty * 0.1),
|
| 234 |
+
})
|
| 235 |
+
|
| 236 |
+
return stages
|
| 237 |
+
|
| 238 |
+
def _estimate_success(
|
| 239 |
+
self,
|
| 240 |
+
vector: AttackVector,
|
| 241 |
+
target_path: list[str],
|
| 242 |
+
observed_defenses: list[str],
|
| 243 |
+
) -> float:
|
| 244 |
+
"""
|
| 245 |
+
Estimate likelihood of success based on path length and defenses.
|
| 246 |
+
"""
|
| 247 |
+
# Base success: harder with longer paths
|
| 248 |
+
base_success = 0.8 - (len(target_path) * 0.1)
|
| 249 |
+
|
| 250 |
+
# Reduce for observed defenses
|
| 251 |
+
defense_impact = len(observed_defenses) * 0.05
|
| 252 |
+
|
| 253 |
+
return max(0.1, min(1.0, base_success - defense_impact))
|
| 254 |
+
|
| 255 |
+
def _generate_rationale(self, vector: AttackVector, target_path: list[str], observed_defenses: list[str]) -> str:
|
| 256 |
+
"""
|
| 257 |
+
Generate a human-readable explanation of the attack plan.
|
| 258 |
+
"""
|
| 259 |
+
if len(target_path) == 1:
|
| 260 |
+
return f"Direct exploit of {vector.value} on single target. No lateral movement required."
|
| 261 |
+
else:
|
| 262 |
+
hops = " → ".join(target_path)
|
| 263 |
+
return f"Multi-stage attack: {vector.value} followed by lateral movement ({hops}). Observed defenses suggest this vector has lower coverage."
|
| 264 |
+
|
| 265 |
+
def adapt_to_defender_action(self, action: str) -> None:
|
| 266 |
+
"""
|
| 267 |
+
Learn from defender actions to improve future plans.
|
| 268 |
+
"""
|
| 269 |
+
self.observed_defenses.append(action)
|
| 270 |
+
|
| 271 |
+
# Bonus: increase stealth/difficulty of future attacks
|
| 272 |
+
# (This would be reflected in next call to generate_attack_plan)
|
| 273 |
+
|
| 274 |
+
|
| 275 |
+
class LLMAdversary:
|
| 276 |
+
"""
|
| 277 |
+
Wrapper that uses the LLMAdversaryReasoner to generate smarter attacks.
|
| 278 |
+
Maintains compatibility with the original AttackEngine interface.
|
| 279 |
+
"""
|
| 280 |
+
|
| 281 |
+
def __init__(self, network: NetworkGraph, difficulty: int = 1, seed: int | None = None):
|
| 282 |
+
self.network = network
|
| 283 |
+
self.difficulty = difficulty
|
| 284 |
+
self.rng = random.Random(seed)
|
| 285 |
+
self.reasoner = LLMAdversaryReasoner(network, seed)
|
| 286 |
+
self.current_plan: AttackPlan | None = None
|
| 287 |
+
|
| 288 |
+
def generate_next_attack(self, sim_time: float) -> Attack:
|
| 289 |
+
"""
|
| 290 |
+
Generate an attack using the LLM reasoner's plan.
|
| 291 |
+
"""
|
| 292 |
+
# Generate a new plan if we don't have one
|
| 293 |
+
if not self.current_plan:
|
| 294 |
+
try:
|
| 295 |
+
self.current_plan = self.reasoner.generate_attack_plan(
|
| 296 |
+
self.difficulty,
|
| 297 |
+
self.reasoner.observed_defenses,
|
| 298 |
+
)
|
| 299 |
+
except (ValueError, IndexError):
|
| 300 |
+
# Fallback if network is empty
|
| 301 |
+
raise ValueError("Cannot generate attack: empty network")
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
plan = self.current_plan
|
| 304 |
+
target = plan.target_path[-1] if plan.target_path else None
|
| 305 |
+
|
| 306 |
+
attack = Attack(
|
| 307 |
+
vector=plan.primary_vector,
|
| 308 |
+
source_node="external",
|
| 309 |
+
target_node=target or "",
|
| 310 |
+
entry_point=f"{plan.primary_vector.value}",
|
| 311 |
+
severity=min(1.0, 0.4 + (self.difficulty * 0.15)),
|
| 312 |
+
started_at=sim_time,
|
| 313 |
+
stealth=min(1.0, 0.3 + (self.difficulty * 0.15)),
|
| 314 |
+
lateral_path=plan.target_path,
|
| 315 |
+
metadata={
|
| 316 |
+
"plan_id": plan.attack_id,
|
| 317 |
+
"rationale": plan.rationale,
|
| 318 |
+
"success_probability": plan.estimated_success_rate,
|
| 319 |
+
"stages": [s["name"] for s in plan.stages],
|
| 320 |
+
}
|
| 321 |
+
)
|
| 322 |
+
|
| 323 |
+
# Clear plan so next call generates a new one
|
| 324 |
+
self.current_plan = None
|
| 325 |
+
|
| 326 |
+
return attack
|
| 327 |
+
|
| 328 |
+
def observe_defender_action(self, action: str) -> None:
|
| 329 |
+
"""
|
| 330 |
+
Record defender action for adaptation.
|
| 331 |
+
"""
|
| 332 |
+
self.reasoner.adapt_to_defender_action(action)
|
| 333 |
+
|
| 334 |
+
def get_attack_rationale(self) -> str:
|
| 335 |
+
"""
|
| 336 |
+
Get the reasoning behind the current/last attack plan.
|
| 337 |
+
Useful for debugging and analysis.
|
| 338 |
+
"""
|
| 339 |
+
if self.current_plan:
|
| 340 |
+
return self.current_plan.rationale
|
| 341 |
+
elif self.reasoner.last_planned_attacks:
|
| 342 |
+
return self.reasoner.last_planned_attacks[-1].rationale
|
| 343 |
+
return "No attack plan generated yet"
|