{ "assessment_version": "nuclear_uap_explanatory_private_preview_v1", "population_explanation_strength_score": 78, "airport_confounder_strength_score": 90, "nuclear_non_support_strength_score": 95, "missing_geocode_handling": { "analysis_status": "completed", "total_us_rows": 123013, "missing_geocode_rows": 17783, "missing_geocode_share": 0.144562, "reason_bucket_counts": { "unmatched_place_name": 14584, "landmark_or_route_location": 1351, "compound_or_parenthetical_place": 1059, "county_level_location": 340, "relative_location_phrase": 270, "blank_city": 179 }, "generated_utc": "2026-04-29T01:25:15+00:00", "safe_handling": "Missing geocodes are not imputed into the spatial tests. They are counted and routed to explicit recovery paths." }, "what_we_can_claim": [ "The missing NUFORC-derived rows were not geocoded by assumption; they were excluded from spatial tests and logged for recovery.", "The public geocoded report rows can be compared against Census place population and commercial-airport proximity as explanatory covariates.", "At the place level, report counts can be assessed against population concentration without claiming reports are true or false.", "Airport proximity can be treated as a public-source confounder, not as proof that airplanes caused specific reports.", "The nuclear power-plant proximity claim remains unsupported in this evidence surface after matched non-nuclear power-plant controls." ], "what_we_cannot_claim": [ "This dataset cannot prove what witnesses saw.", "This dataset cannot claim aircraft explain every report.", "This dataset cannot treat city/place centroids as exact sighting coordinates.", "This dataset cannot rule out all nuclear-weapons, military, or classified-site hypotheses.", "This dataset cannot assume the skipped missing-geocode rows would preserve or reverse the result without a separate recovery run." ], "safe_claim_language_passes": true, "plain_english_assessment": "The better explanation surface is population/reporting geography plus ordinary aviation proximity, while the nuclear-specific proximity claim remains unsupported after controls." }