Upload agents/optical_agent.py with huggingface_hub
Browse files- agents/optical_agent.py +253 -28
agents/optical_agent.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -292,39 +292,264 @@ def analyze_bokeh(img: Image.Image) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
|
| 292 |
}
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 295 |
# βββ Main Agent Entry Point βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 296 |
def run_optical_agent(img: Image.Image) -> AgentEvidence:
|
| 297 |
"""Run all optical physics tests and produce structured evidence."""
|
| 298 |
findings = []
|
| 299 |
scores = []
|
| 300 |
|
| 301 |
-
|
| 302 |
-
|
| 303 |
-
|
| 304 |
-
|
| 305 |
-
|
| 306 |
-
|
| 307 |
-
|
| 308 |
-
|
| 309 |
-
|
| 310 |
-
|
| 311 |
-
|
| 312 |
-
|
| 313 |
-
|
| 314 |
-
|
| 315 |
-
|
| 316 |
-
|
| 317 |
-
|
| 318 |
-
|
| 319 |
-
except Exception as e:
|
| 320 |
-
findings.append({"test": "DoF Consistency", "error": str(e), "score": 0})
|
| 321 |
-
|
| 322 |
-
try:
|
| 323 |
-
bokeh = analyze_bokeh(img)
|
| 324 |
-
findings.append(bokeh)
|
| 325 |
-
scores.append(bokeh["score"])
|
| 326 |
-
except Exception as e:
|
| 327 |
-
findings.append({"test": "Bokeh Microstructure", "error": str(e), "score": 0})
|
| 328 |
|
| 329 |
if scores:
|
| 330 |
avg_score = float(np.mean(scores))
|
|
@@ -352,7 +577,7 @@ def run_optical_agent(img: Image.Image) -> AgentEvidence:
|
|
| 352 |
agent_name="Optical Physics Agent",
|
| 353 |
violation_score=np.clip(avg_score, -1, 1),
|
| 354 |
confidence=confidence,
|
| 355 |
-
failure_prob=max(0.0, 1.0 - len(scores) /
|
| 356 |
rationale=rationale,
|
| 357 |
sub_findings=findings,
|
| 358 |
)
|
|
|
|
| 292 |
}
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 |
|
| 295 |
+
# βββ Lens Distortion Analysis ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 296 |
+
def analyze_lens_distortion(img: Image.Image) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
| 297 |
+
"""
|
| 298 |
+
Real lenses produce barrel/pincushion distortion following Brown-Conrady model.
|
| 299 |
+
AI images often have perfectly rectilinear geometry or impossible distortion.
|
| 300 |
+
"""
|
| 301 |
+
gray = _to_gray(img)
|
| 302 |
+
h, w = gray.shape
|
| 303 |
+
|
| 304 |
+
# Edge detection
|
| 305 |
+
ex = sobel(gray, axis=1)
|
| 306 |
+
ey = sobel(gray, axis=0)
|
| 307 |
+
edge_mag = np.hypot(ex, ey)
|
| 308 |
+
|
| 309 |
+
# Threshold strong edges
|
| 310 |
+
threshold = np.percentile(edge_mag, 90)
|
| 311 |
+
strong_edges = edge_mag > threshold
|
| 312 |
+
|
| 313 |
+
# Analyze edge straightness in radial bands
|
| 314 |
+
cy, cx = h / 2, w / 2
|
| 315 |
+
Y, X = np.mgrid[0:h, 0:w]
|
| 316 |
+
R = np.sqrt((X - cx) ** 2 + (Y - cy) ** 2)
|
| 317 |
+
R_max = np.sqrt(cx ** 2 + cy ** 2)
|
| 318 |
+
R_norm = R / R_max
|
| 319 |
+
|
| 320 |
+
# Compare edge density at different radial distances
|
| 321 |
+
inner_edges = float(np.mean(strong_edges[R_norm < 0.3]))
|
| 322 |
+
mid_edges = float(np.mean(strong_edges[(R_norm >= 0.3) & (R_norm < 0.7)]))
|
| 323 |
+
outer_edges = float(np.mean(strong_edges[R_norm >= 0.7]))
|
| 324 |
+
|
| 325 |
+
# Real lenses: edges slightly softer at corners due to distortion
|
| 326 |
+
# AI: uniform edge sharpness across frame
|
| 327 |
+
edge_ratio = outer_edges / (inner_edges + 1e-9)
|
| 328 |
+
|
| 329 |
+
if 0.5 < edge_ratio < 0.9:
|
| 330 |
+
score = -0.3
|
| 331 |
+
note = f"Natural edge falloff at periphery (ratio={edge_ratio:.3f}, lens distortion present)"
|
| 332 |
+
elif edge_ratio > 0.95:
|
| 333 |
+
score = 0.3
|
| 334 |
+
note = f"Unnaturally uniform edges across frame (ratio={edge_ratio:.3f}, no lens distortion)"
|
| 335 |
+
else:
|
| 336 |
+
score = 0.1
|
| 337 |
+
note = f"Edge distribution ratio={edge_ratio:.3f}"
|
| 338 |
+
|
| 339 |
+
return {
|
| 340 |
+
"test": "Lens Distortion",
|
| 341 |
+
"edge_ratio_outer_inner": round(edge_ratio, 4),
|
| 342 |
+
"inner_edge_density": round(inner_edges, 4),
|
| 343 |
+
"outer_edge_density": round(outer_edges, 4),
|
| 344 |
+
"score": score,
|
| 345 |
+
"note": note,
|
| 346 |
+
}
|
| 347 |
+
|
| 348 |
+
|
| 349 |
+
# βββ CA Radial Pattern Analysis βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 350 |
+
def analyze_ca_radial_pattern(img: Image.Image) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
| 351 |
+
"""
|
| 352 |
+
Real chromatic aberration increases radially from center (more at corners).
|
| 353 |
+
AI images have spatially uniform or random channel misregistration.
|
| 354 |
+
"""
|
| 355 |
+
rgb = _to_rgb(img)
|
| 356 |
+
h, w, _ = rgb.shape
|
| 357 |
+
cy, cx = h / 2, w / 2
|
| 358 |
+
|
| 359 |
+
r, g, b = rgb[:, :, 0], rgb[:, :, 1], rgb[:, :, 2]
|
| 360 |
+
|
| 361 |
+
# Compute local channel difference in blocks
|
| 362 |
+
block_size = max(32, min(h, w) // 8)
|
| 363 |
+
center_diffs = []
|
| 364 |
+
edge_diffs = []
|
| 365 |
+
|
| 366 |
+
Y, X = np.mgrid[0:h, 0:w]
|
| 367 |
+
R = np.sqrt((X - cx) ** 2 + (Y - cy) ** 2)
|
| 368 |
+
R_max = np.sqrt(cx ** 2 + cy ** 2)
|
| 369 |
+
|
| 370 |
+
for bi in range(0, h - block_size, block_size):
|
| 371 |
+
for bj in range(0, w - block_size, block_size):
|
| 372 |
+
block_r = r[bi:bi + block_size, bj:bj + block_size]
|
| 373 |
+
block_g = g[bi:bi + block_size, bj:bj + block_size]
|
| 374 |
+
block_b = b[bi:bi + block_size, bj:bj + block_size]
|
| 375 |
+
|
| 376 |
+
# Local RG difference as proxy for CA
|
| 377 |
+
rg_diff = float(np.std(block_r - block_g))
|
| 378 |
+
rb_diff = float(np.std(block_r - block_b))
|
| 379 |
+
ca_magnitude = (rg_diff + rb_diff) / 2
|
| 380 |
+
|
| 381 |
+
block_center_r = R[bi + block_size // 2, bj + block_size // 2] / R_max
|
| 382 |
+
|
| 383 |
+
if block_center_r < 0.4:
|
| 384 |
+
center_diffs.append(ca_magnitude)
|
| 385 |
+
elif block_center_r > 0.6:
|
| 386 |
+
edge_diffs.append(ca_magnitude)
|
| 387 |
+
|
| 388 |
+
if center_diffs and edge_diffs:
|
| 389 |
+
center_ca = float(np.mean(center_diffs))
|
| 390 |
+
edge_ca = float(np.mean(edge_diffs))
|
| 391 |
+
ca_increase = edge_ca / (center_ca + 1e-9)
|
| 392 |
+
|
| 393 |
+
# Real lenses: CA increases toward edges (ratio > 1.1)
|
| 394 |
+
if ca_increase > 1.15:
|
| 395 |
+
score = -0.3
|
| 396 |
+
note = f"CA increases radially (edge/center={ca_increase:.2f}, natural lens behavior)"
|
| 397 |
+
elif ca_increase < 0.9:
|
| 398 |
+
score = 0.3
|
| 399 |
+
note = f"CA decreases toward edges (ratio={ca_increase:.2f}, unnatural)"
|
| 400 |
+
else:
|
| 401 |
+
score = 0.1
|
| 402 |
+
note = f"Flat CA distribution (ratio={ca_increase:.2f})"
|
| 403 |
+
else:
|
| 404 |
+
ca_increase = 1.0
|
| 405 |
+
score = 0.0
|
| 406 |
+
note = "Insufficient data for radial CA analysis"
|
| 407 |
+
|
| 408 |
+
return {
|
| 409 |
+
"test": "CA Radial Pattern",
|
| 410 |
+
"ca_edge_center_ratio": round(ca_increase, 4),
|
| 411 |
+
"score": score,
|
| 412 |
+
"note": note,
|
| 413 |
+
}
|
| 414 |
+
|
| 415 |
+
|
| 416 |
+
# βββ Specular Reflection Map ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 417 |
+
def analyze_specular_reflections(img: Image.Image) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
| 418 |
+
"""
|
| 419 |
+
Real specular reflections follow Phong/Blinn-Phong model with
|
| 420 |
+
consistent highlight shapes. AI often has inconsistent specularity.
|
| 421 |
+
"""
|
| 422 |
+
rgb = _to_rgb(img)
|
| 423 |
+
gray = np.mean(rgb, axis=-1)
|
| 424 |
+
|
| 425 |
+
# Detect specular highlights (very bright, near-white pixels)
|
| 426 |
+
highlight_threshold = np.percentile(gray, 98)
|
| 427 |
+
highlight_mask = gray > highlight_threshold
|
| 428 |
+
|
| 429 |
+
# Compute saturation (low saturation = specular)
|
| 430 |
+
max_c = np.max(rgb, axis=-1)
|
| 431 |
+
min_c = np.min(rgb, axis=-1)
|
| 432 |
+
saturation = (max_c - min_c) / (max_c + 1e-9)
|
| 433 |
+
|
| 434 |
+
specular_mask = highlight_mask & (saturation < 0.2)
|
| 435 |
+
n_specular = int(np.sum(specular_mask))
|
| 436 |
+
specular_fraction = float(n_specular / (gray.size + 1e-9))
|
| 437 |
+
|
| 438 |
+
if n_specular < 50:
|
| 439 |
+
return {
|
| 440 |
+
"test": "Specular Reflections",
|
| 441 |
+
"score": 0.0,
|
| 442 |
+
"note": "Insufficient specular highlights for analysis",
|
| 443 |
+
"specular_count": n_specular,
|
| 444 |
+
}
|
| 445 |
+
|
| 446 |
+
# Check if specular highlights are compact (real) vs diffuse (AI)
|
| 447 |
+
from scipy.ndimage import label
|
| 448 |
+
labeled, n_features = label(specular_mask)
|
| 449 |
+
if n_features > 0:
|
| 450 |
+
sizes = [int(np.sum(labeled == i)) for i in range(1, min(n_features + 1, 100))]
|
| 451 |
+
avg_size = float(np.mean(sizes))
|
| 452 |
+
size_std = float(np.std(sizes))
|
| 453 |
+
size_cv = size_std / (avg_size + 1e-9) # coefficient of variation
|
| 454 |
+
else:
|
| 455 |
+
size_cv = 0.0
|
| 456 |
+
avg_size = 0.0
|
| 457 |
+
|
| 458 |
+
# Real highlights: varied sizes (large CV), AI: uniform sizes
|
| 459 |
+
if size_cv > 1.0:
|
| 460 |
+
score = -0.2
|
| 461 |
+
note = f"Varied specular highlight sizes (CV={size_cv:.2f}, natural)"
|
| 462 |
+
elif size_cv < 0.3 and n_features > 3:
|
| 463 |
+
score = 0.3
|
| 464 |
+
note = f"Suspiciously uniform highlight sizes (CV={size_cv:.2f})"
|
| 465 |
+
else:
|
| 466 |
+
score = 0.0
|
| 467 |
+
note = f"Specular analysis neutral (CV={size_cv:.2f})"
|
| 468 |
+
|
| 469 |
+
return {
|
| 470 |
+
"test": "Specular Reflections",
|
| 471 |
+
"specular_count": n_specular,
|
| 472 |
+
"n_highlights": n_features,
|
| 473 |
+
"size_cv": round(size_cv, 4),
|
| 474 |
+
"avg_size": round(avg_size, 2),
|
| 475 |
+
"score": score,
|
| 476 |
+
"note": note,
|
| 477 |
+
}
|
| 478 |
+
|
| 479 |
+
|
| 480 |
+
# βββ Purple Fringing Detection ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 481 |
+
def analyze_purple_fringing(img: Image.Image) -> Dict[str, Any]:
|
| 482 |
+
"""
|
| 483 |
+
Real cameras exhibit purple/magenta fringing at high-contrast edges
|
| 484 |
+
due to chromatic aberration. AI images rarely reproduce this artifact.
|
| 485 |
+
"""
|
| 486 |
+
rgb = _to_rgb(img)
|
| 487 |
+
gray = np.mean(rgb, axis=-1)
|
| 488 |
+
|
| 489 |
+
# Find high-contrast edges
|
| 490 |
+
edge = np.hypot(sobel(gray, axis=0), sobel(gray, axis=1))
|
| 491 |
+
edge_mask = edge > np.percentile(edge, 95)
|
| 492 |
+
|
| 493 |
+
# Check for purple/magenta hue at edges
|
| 494 |
+
r, g, b = rgb[:, :, 0], rgb[:, :, 1], rgb[:, :, 2]
|
| 495 |
+
|
| 496 |
+
# Purple = high R, low G, high B
|
| 497 |
+
purple_score_map = (r + b - 2 * g) / (r + g + b + 1e-9)
|
| 498 |
+
edge_purple = purple_score_map[edge_mask]
|
| 499 |
+
|
| 500 |
+
if len(edge_purple) < 100:
|
| 501 |
+
return {
|
| 502 |
+
"test": "Purple Fringing",
|
| 503 |
+
"score": 0.0,
|
| 504 |
+
"note": "Insufficient high-contrast edges for fringing analysis",
|
| 505 |
+
}
|
| 506 |
+
|
| 507 |
+
mean_purple = float(np.mean(edge_purple))
|
| 508 |
+
purple_fraction = float(np.mean(edge_purple > 0.1))
|
| 509 |
+
|
| 510 |
+
if purple_fraction > 0.05:
|
| 511 |
+
score = -0.3
|
| 512 |
+
note = f"Purple fringing detected at {purple_fraction:.1%} of edges (real lens artifact)"
|
| 513 |
+
elif purple_fraction < 0.01 and mean_purple < 0.02:
|
| 514 |
+
score = 0.2
|
| 515 |
+
note = "No purple fringing (uncommon in real photography, possible AI)"
|
| 516 |
+
else:
|
| 517 |
+
score = 0.0
|
| 518 |
+
note = f"Minimal fringing (fraction={purple_fraction:.3f})"
|
| 519 |
+
|
| 520 |
+
return {
|
| 521 |
+
"test": "Purple Fringing",
|
| 522 |
+
"purple_fraction": round(purple_fraction, 4),
|
| 523 |
+
"mean_purple_score": round(mean_purple, 4),
|
| 524 |
+
"score": score,
|
| 525 |
+
"note": note,
|
| 526 |
+
}
|
| 527 |
+
|
| 528 |
+
|
| 529 |
# βββ Main Agent Entry Point βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
|
| 530 |
def run_optical_agent(img: Image.Image) -> AgentEvidence:
|
| 531 |
"""Run all optical physics tests and produce structured evidence."""
|
| 532 |
findings = []
|
| 533 |
scores = []
|
| 534 |
|
| 535 |
+
tests = [
|
| 536 |
+
analyze_chromatic_aberration,
|
| 537 |
+
analyze_vignetting,
|
| 538 |
+
analyze_dof_consistency,
|
| 539 |
+
analyze_bokeh,
|
| 540 |
+
analyze_lens_distortion,
|
| 541 |
+
analyze_ca_radial_pattern,
|
| 542 |
+
analyze_specular_reflections,
|
| 543 |
+
analyze_purple_fringing,
|
| 544 |
+
]
|
| 545 |
+
|
| 546 |
+
for fn in tests:
|
| 547 |
+
try:
|
| 548 |
+
result = fn(img)
|
| 549 |
+
findings.append(result)
|
| 550 |
+
scores.append(result["score"])
|
| 551 |
+
except Exception as e:
|
| 552 |
+
findings.append({"test": fn.__name__, "error": str(e), "score": 0})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 553 |
|
| 554 |
if scores:
|
| 555 |
avg_score = float(np.mean(scores))
|
|
|
|
| 577 |
agent_name="Optical Physics Agent",
|
| 578 |
violation_score=np.clip(avg_score, -1, 1),
|
| 579 |
confidence=confidence,
|
| 580 |
+
failure_prob=max(0.0, 1.0 - len(scores) / len(tests)),
|
| 581 |
rationale=rationale,
|
| 582 |
sub_findings=findings,
|
| 583 |
)
|