anky2002 commited on
Commit
6a1eeda
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): c21bd7b

Upload agents/semantic_agent.py with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. agents/semantic_agent.py +16 -4
agents/semantic_agent.py CHANGED
@@ -280,9 +280,18 @@ Your 8 analysis domains:
280
 
281
  7. SIGN & LABEL COHERENCE: Visible signs, labels, and text should be appropriate for the scene type. A restaurant should show food-related signage. A hospital should show medical signage. Signs in a residential area should show house numbers, street names. Complete absence of expected signage in a commercial area is mildly suspicious.
282
 
283
- 8. OBJECT FUNCTION & ARRANGEMENT: Furniture should be arranged for use (chairs face tables). Appliances should be connected (lamps plugged in, or at least near outlets). Tools should be held or stored correctly. Kitchen items should be in kitchens. Check for: objects that serve no function, impossible arrangements, or items placed where they'd be impractical.""" + CONFIDENCE_CALIBRATION
284
-
285
- USR_CONTEXT = """Analyze contextual plausibility across all 8 domains:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
286
  1. Temporal/Season β€” vegetation vs clothing vs weather
287
  2. Time of Day β€” sky vs shadows vs lighting
288
  3. Era/Technology β€” anachronistic objects
@@ -291,6 +300,7 @@ USR_CONTEXT = """Analyze contextual plausibility across all 8 domains:
291
  6. Attire-Setting β€” clothing appropriate for location/activity
292
  7. Sign/Label Coherence β€” signage matches scene type
293
  8. Object Arrangement β€” functional, plausible placement
 
294
 
295
  Respond in JSON:
296
  {
@@ -302,6 +312,7 @@ Respond in JSON:
302
  "attire_setting_match": true/false,
303
  "signage_coherent": true/false,
304
  "objects_functional": true/false,
 
305
  "anomalies": ["specific contextual violations with reasoning"],
306
  "confidence": 0.0-1.0,
307
  "verdict": "AUTHENTIC" or "SUSPICIOUS" or "MANIPULATED",
@@ -432,7 +443,8 @@ def run_semantic_agent(img):
432
 
433
  context_features = ["Season Consistency","Time-of-Day","Era/Technology",
434
  "Geographic Coherence","Weather Coherence",
435
- "Attire-Setting Match","Sign/Label Coherence","Object Arrangement"]
 
436
  for feat in context_features:
437
  findings.append({"test": feat, "score": sc / len(context_features),
438
  "note": parsed.get("explanation", "")[:100], "parent": "Context"})
 
280
 
281
  7. SIGN & LABEL COHERENCE: Visible signs, labels, and text should be appropriate for the scene type. A restaurant should show food-related signage. A hospital should show medical signage. Signs in a residential area should show house numbers, street names. Complete absence of expected signage in a commercial area is mildly suspicious.
282
 
283
+ 8. OBJECT FUNCTION & ARRANGEMENT: Furniture should be arranged for use (chairs face tables). Appliances should be connected (lamps plugged in, or at least near outlets). Tools should be held or stored correctly. Kitchen items should be in kitchens. Check for: objects that serve no function, impossible arrangements, or items placed where they'd be impractical.
284
+
285
+ 9. AI STOCK PHOTO AESTHETICS β€” CRITICAL CHECK: AI-generated professional/office/lifestyle images have distinctive tells:
286
+ - UNNATURALLY CLEAN environments: offices with zero clutter, kitchens with no crumbs, desks with nothing out of place. Real offices have cable tangles, personal items, slight mess.
287
+ - IMPOSSIBLY PERFECT LIGHTING: perfectly even illumination with no harsh shadows, especially in indoor scenes where windows should create directional light and dark corners.
288
+ - REPEATED IDENTICAL ELEMENTS: multiple sticky notes that are exactly the same size/color/angle, identical books on a shelf, repeated patterns that a human would vary.
289
+ - WHITEBOARD/SCREEN CONTENT: Text on whiteboards that looks coherent from a distance but contains repeated phrases, nonsensical diagrams, or text that doesn't quite form real words. Look for duplicated headers, flowcharts that loop impossibly, and bullet points that repeat.
290
+ - STOCK PHOTO POSES: People in unnaturally perfect poses, smiling too evenly, gesturing in ways that look like stock photography templates rather than candid moments.
291
+ - SKIN PERFECTION: Completely poreless, airbrushed-looking skin with no visible texture, freckles, or imperfections. Real people have skin texture visible at any reasonable resolution.
292
+ Flag ANY of these patterns β€” they are strong AI-generation indicators.""" + CONFIDENCE_CALIBRATION
293
+
294
+ USR_CONTEXT = """Analyze contextual plausibility across all 9 domains:
295
  1. Temporal/Season β€” vegetation vs clothing vs weather
296
  2. Time of Day β€” sky vs shadows vs lighting
297
  3. Era/Technology β€” anachronistic objects
 
300
  6. Attire-Setting β€” clothing appropriate for location/activity
301
  7. Sign/Label Coherence β€” signage matches scene type
302
  8. Object Arrangement β€” functional, plausible placement
303
+ 9. AI Stock Photo Aesthetics β€” unnaturally clean, perfect lighting, repeated elements, whiteboard gibberish, stock poses, poreless skin
304
 
305
  Respond in JSON:
306
  {
 
312
  "attire_setting_match": true/false,
313
  "signage_coherent": true/false,
314
  "objects_functional": true/false,
315
+ "ai_stock_aesthetics": true/false,
316
  "anomalies": ["specific contextual violations with reasoning"],
317
  "confidence": 0.0-1.0,
318
  "verdict": "AUTHENTIC" or "SUSPICIOUS" or "MANIPULATED",
 
443
 
444
  context_features = ["Season Consistency","Time-of-Day","Era/Technology",
445
  "Geographic Coherence","Weather Coherence",
446
+ "Attire-Setting Match","Sign/Label Coherence",
447
+ "Object Arrangement","AI Stock Photo Aesthetics"]
448
  for feat in context_features:
449
  findings.append({"test": feat, "score": sc / len(context_features),
450
  "note": parsed.get("explanation", "")[:100], "parent": "Context"})