Upload agents/utils.py with huggingface_hub
Browse files- agents/utils.py +105 -0
agents/utils.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""FORENSIQ — Shared utilities for all agents."""
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
import numpy as np
|
| 4 |
+
from typing import List, Dict, Any
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
def compute_agent_confidence(scores: List[float]) -> float:
|
| 8 |
+
"""
|
| 9 |
+
Compute agent confidence using agreement-vs-cancellation logic.
|
| 10 |
+
Backported from semantic agent to ALL signal agents.
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
Returns a confidence value between 0.1 and 1.0 that reflects:
|
| 13 |
+
- High confidence when scores agree in direction and have high magnitude
|
| 14 |
+
- Low confidence when scores cancel each other out
|
| 15 |
+
- Low confidence when all scores are near zero (no signal)
|
| 16 |
+
"""
|
| 17 |
+
if not scores:
|
| 18 |
+
return 0.1
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
avg = float(np.mean(scores))
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
# Classify each score's direction
|
| 23 |
+
signs = [1 if s > 0.05 else (-1 if s < -0.05 else 0) for s in scores]
|
| 24 |
+
n_pos = sum(1 for s in signs if s > 0)
|
| 25 |
+
n_neg = sum(1 for s in signs if s < 0)
|
| 26 |
+
n_neu = sum(1 for s in signs if s == 0)
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
if n_pos > 0 and n_neg > 0:
|
| 29 |
+
# Scores cancel — low confidence
|
| 30 |
+
agreement = max(n_pos, n_neg) / (n_pos + n_neg)
|
| 31 |
+
return min(1.0, 0.15 + 0.5 * abs(avg) * agreement)
|
| 32 |
+
elif n_neu == len(signs):
|
| 33 |
+
# All genuinely neutral — low confidence
|
| 34 |
+
return 0.2
|
| 35 |
+
else:
|
| 36 |
+
# Scores agree — confidence scales with magnitude
|
| 37 |
+
return min(1.0, 0.3 + 0.6 * abs(avg))
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
def compute_failure_prob(n_ran: int, n_total: int, n_insufficient: int = 0) -> float:
|
| 41 |
+
"""
|
| 42 |
+
Compute agent failure probability.
|
| 43 |
+
Accounts for both crashed tests AND tests returning insufficient data.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
n_ran: tests that returned a score (including insufficient-data ones)
|
| 46 |
+
n_total: total tests attempted
|
| 47 |
+
n_insufficient: tests that returned score=0 due to insufficient data
|
| 48 |
+
"""
|
| 49 |
+
n_effective = n_ran - n_insufficient # tests that actually produced signal
|
| 50 |
+
return max(0.0, 1.0 - n_effective / max(n_total, 1))
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
def run_agent_tests(tests, img, agent_name):
|
| 54 |
+
"""
|
| 55 |
+
Shared test runner for all signal-processing agents.
|
| 56 |
+
Handles: running tests, tagging insufficient-data, computing confidence properly.
|
| 57 |
+
"""
|
| 58 |
+
findings, scores = [], []
|
| 59 |
+
n_insufficient = 0
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
for fn in tests:
|
| 62 |
+
try:
|
| 63 |
+
r = fn(img)
|
| 64 |
+
findings.append(r)
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
sc = r.get("score", 0)
|
| 67 |
+
note = r.get("note", "")
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
# P7: Detect insufficient-data results — tag as not_applicable
|
| 70 |
+
is_insufficient = (sc == 0.0 and any(kw in note.lower() for kw in
|
| 71 |
+
["insufficient", "too small", "no data", "not available", "few ", "no "]))
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
if is_insufficient:
|
| 74 |
+
r["not_applicable"] = True
|
| 75 |
+
n_insufficient += 1
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
scores.append(sc)
|
| 78 |
+
except Exception as e:
|
| 79 |
+
findings.append({"test": fn.__name__, "error": str(e), "score": 0})
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
# Filter out not_applicable scores for averaging
|
| 82 |
+
active_scores = [s for s, f in zip(scores, findings)
|
| 83 |
+
if not f.get("not_applicable", False)]
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
avg = float(np.mean(active_scores)) if active_scores else 0.0
|
| 86 |
+
conf = compute_agent_confidence(active_scores)
|
| 87 |
+
fail = compute_failure_prob(len(scores), len(tests), n_insufficient)
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
# Build rationale
|
| 90 |
+
viol = [f["test"] for f in findings if f.get("score", 0) > 0.2 and not f.get("not_applicable")]
|
| 91 |
+
comp = [f["test"] for f in findings if f.get("score", 0) < -0.1 and not f.get("not_applicable")]
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
domain = agent_name.replace(" Agent", "")
|
| 94 |
+
if viol:
|
| 95 |
+
rat = f"{domain} violations: {', '.join(viol)}."
|
| 96 |
+
elif comp:
|
| 97 |
+
rat = f"{domain} consistent: {', '.join(comp)}."
|
| 98 |
+
else:
|
| 99 |
+
rat = f"{domain} inconclusive."
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
for f in findings:
|
| 102 |
+
if f.get("note") and not f.get("not_applicable"):
|
| 103 |
+
rat += f" [{f['test']}]: {f['note']}."
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
return findings, avg, conf, fail, rat
|