"""compare_node — three-way matching: invoice + delivery note + purchase order. The 535-line ``validation/compare.py`` implements the algorithm; this node glues it to the graph state: 1. Find the first three-way (invoice + delivery_note + purchase_order) 2. Call ``validation.compare.three_way_match()`` 3. Wrap the result into a ``ComparisonReport`` Pydantic model in the parent state 4. Convert critical mismatches to Risks (``kind="cross_check"``) """ from __future__ import annotations from graph.states.pipeline_state import ( ComparisonReport, PipelineState, ProcessedDocument, Risk, ) from validation.compare import three_way_match def _to_pydantic_report( result, invoice_name: str, delivery_name: str, order_name: str, ) -> ComparisonReport: """``ComparisonResult`` (dataclass) → ``ComparisonReport`` (Pydantic) conversion.""" overall = "ok" if result.critical_count > 0: overall = "critical" elif result.warning_count > 0: overall = "warning" elif result.missing_count > 0: overall = "missing" summary = ( f"3-way match: {invoice_name} / {delivery_name} / {order_name} -- " f"{result.total_checks} checks, {result.ok_count} ok, " f"{result.warning_count} warning, {result.critical_count} critical, " f"{result.missing_count} missing" ) return ComparisonReport( invoice_filename=invoice_name, delivery_note_filename=delivery_name, purchase_order_filename=order_name, matches=[m.to_dict() for m in result.matches], total_checks=result.total_checks, ok_count=result.ok_count, warning_count=result.warning_count, critical_count=result.critical_count, missing_count=result.missing_count, overall_status=overall, summary=summary, ) async def compare_node(state: PipelineState) -> dict: """Three-way match on the first invoice + delivery_note + purchase_order trio.""" documents: list[ProcessedDocument] = state.get("documents") or [] invoices = [d for d in documents if d.classification and d.classification.doc_type == "invoice"] delivery_notes = [d for d in documents if d.classification and d.classification.doc_type == "delivery_note"] purchase_orders = [d for d in documents if d.classification and d.classification.doc_type == "purchase_order"] if not (invoices and delivery_notes and purchase_orders): return {"comparison": None} inv = invoices[0] dn = delivery_notes[0] po = purchase_orders[0] if not (inv.extracted and dn.extracted and po.extracted): return {"comparison": None} # 4-pass item matching + apples-to-apples amount comparison result = three_way_match( invoice=inv.extracted.raw, delivery_note=dn.extracted.raw, purchase_order=po.extracted.raw, ) report = _to_pydantic_report( result, invoice_name=inv.ingested.file_name, delivery_name=dn.ingested.file_name, order_name=po.ingested.file_name, ) # Convert critical / warning matches → Risks (kind="cross_check"), with # description-level dedup. risks: list[Risk] = [] seen: set[str] = set() for m in result.matches: if m.severity == "ok": continue msg = m.message if msg in seen: continue seen.add(msg) if m.severity == "critical": risks.append(Risk( description=msg, severity="high", rationale="Critical discrepancy across documents", kind="cross_check", source_check_id="compare_three_way", )) elif m.severity == "warning": risks.append(Risk( description=msg, severity="medium", rationale="Warning-level discrepancy", kind="cross_check", source_check_id="compare_three_way", )) out: dict = {"comparison": report} if risks: out["risks"] = risks return out