# PhysiX — Equation Discovery from Noisy Trajectories via RLVR **OpenEnv India Hackathon 2026** · [Live Space](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Pratyush-01/physix-live) · [Trained Model](https://huggingface.co/Pratyush-01/physix-3b-rl) · [W&B Runs](https://wandb.ai/pratyush01/physix-live) --- ## The Problem Given a short, noisy trajectory of a physical system — positions and velocities over time — can a language model discover the underlying equation of motion? This is symbolic regression meets agentic RL. The challenge: the equation space is vast, noise means no trajectory perfectly fits any ODE, and the agent must learn to iterate — propose, simulate, compare residuals, refine. Classical tools (genetic programming, sparse regression) can do this, but they can't read a natural language hint or reason about failure in English. We train a 3B LLM to do it using RLVR. --- ## The Environment **PhysiXEnvironment** gives the agent a noisy trajectory from a physical system and asks it to output an ODE that reproduces the motion. All reward comes from `scipy.odeint` — no LLM-as-judge. ### Systems Three systems were used for training: | System | Ground-truth ODE | |--------|-----------------| | Free Fall | `d2y/dt2 = -g` | | Simple Pendulum | `d2theta/dt2 = -(g/L)*sin(theta)` | | Damped Spring | `d2x/dt2 = -(k/m)*x - (b/m)*dx` | Parameters and initial conditions are randomised per episode. ### Episode flow 1. `reset()` → agent receives a noisy trajectory + a one-sentence physical hint 2. Agent proposes an ODE in JSON: `{"equation": "...", "params": {...}}` 3. Environment simulates it via `scipy.odeint` and computes R² 4. Agent receives a residual summary in English + numeric reward breakdown 5. Repeat up to 8 turns --- ## Reward Design All reward is computed from `scipy.odeint` — no model-in-the-loop scoring. **R²** (coefficient of determination): R² = 1 is a perfect match, R² = 0 means no better than predicting the mean, R² < 0 is actively wrong. | Component | Formula | What it rewards | Why it's needed | |-----------|---------|-----------------|-----------------| | `match` | R² | Continuous fit quality | Primary learning signal | | `match_dense` | √R² | Same, stretched | R² ≈ 0 early on; √R² gives non-zero gradient (√0.05 ≈ 0.22) so GRPO isn't blind in early steps | | `correctness` | 1 if R² ≥ 0.70 else 0 | Binary "good enough" | Creates a cliff the policy climbs; helps escape plateaus | | `simplicity` | 1 − operators/12, gated on R² ≥ 0.10 | Shorter equations | Without the gate, `d2y/dt2 = 0` scores simplicity = 1 for free | | `format` | 1 if parses **and** `odeint` runs without NaN | Valid, simulatable output | Without the NaN check, explosive equations like `exp(vy**10)` claim reward | --- ## Training: SFT → GRPO ### Why SFT first Qwen2.5-3B out of the box produces LaTeX, prose, or malformed JSON on ~80% of turns — the verifier can't parse any of it. GRPO needs *variance in reward* across rollouts to estimate advantages; if every rollout scores ~0 because nothing parses, the gradient is zero and nothing learns. SFT on synthetic `(prompt, ground_truth_equation)` pairs teaches the model the output format before RL begins. 4 epochs, ~5 min on L40S. After SFT, >90% of completions parse and simulate successfully — GRPO now has a signal to work with. ### GRPO - **Model:** Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct + LoRA-32 - **Systems:** free_fall, simple_pendulum, damped_spring - **Steps:** 200 (early stopping on reward convergence) - **LR:** 1e-5 - **Generations:** 4 per prompt - **Framework:** Unsloth + TRL GRPOTrainer --- ## Results | SFT Loss (↓) | GRPO Loss (↓) | |:---:|:---:| | ![SFT loss](plots/sft_loss.png) | ![GRPO loss](plots/loss.png) | | GRPO Total Reward (↑) | |:---:| | ![reward](plots/reward.png) | | Per-component reward breakdown | |:---:| | ![reward components](plots/reward_components.png) | Key observations: - `reward_format` jumps to ~0.9 in the first 10 steps — the SFT warm-start does its job immediately - `reward_match_dense` (√R²) and `reward_correctness` climb from ~0.6 → ~0.95 over 200 steps - `reward_match` (raw R²) converges to ~0.95+ by step 150 - Total mean reward rises from ~3.3 → ~4.8 (+45%) with ±1σ variance shrinking - GRPO loss near zero is **expected** — it's the KL regularisation term; the real signal is the reward curves Full runs: [wandb.ai/pratyush01/physix-live](https://wandb.ai/pratyush01/physix-live) --- ## What's Novel 1. **Verifiable reward without a judge** — R² from `scipy.odeint` is ground truth, not a proxy 2. **Iterative refinement loop** — the environment feeds residual summaries back in English so the agent can reason about what went wrong and refine 3. **Reward hacking case study** — three exploits found and patched during development: parse-but-crash equations, trivial-equation simplicity farming, duplicate progress signal 4. **SFT → GRPO pipeline** — shows how a cold 3B model can be made RL-trainable in under 10 minutes of SFT --- ## Future Scope The framework is system-agnostic — adding a new physical system means subclassing `PhysicalSystem`, implementing `simulate` and `ground_truth_equation`, and registering it. The verifier, reward function, and training loop need no changes. Natural extensions: - **More complex dynamics** — coupled oscillators, Lorenz attractor, reaction-diffusion, N-body gravity - **Larger models** — the same pipeline runs on 7B; LoRA rank and LR need tuning but the reward design transfers directly - **Multi-turn curriculum** — currently trains on turn-0 only; training on full refinement trajectories would teach the model to use residual feedback more effectively - **Noisier / sparser observations** — current trajectories have moderate Gaussian noise; testing on sparser or higher-noise regimes would stress-test the R² reward --- ## Links - **Live demo:** https://huggingface.co/spaces/Pratyush-01/physix-live - **Trained model:** https://huggingface.co/Pratyush-01/physix-3b-rl - **Training notebook:** https://huggingface.co/spaces/Pratyush-01/physix-live/blob/main/train/physix_train_colab.ipynb - **W&B project:** https://wandb.ai/pratyush01/physix-live