Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 40,426 Bytes
4c69214 ece0bbe 4c69214 ece0bbe 4c69214 ece0bbe 4c69214 63216a8 4c69214 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 | # RhythmEnv β Architecture & Training Flow
Visual deep dive into how the env is structured and how the LLM agent
learns from it. All examples use concrete values (seed=42, sampled
profile, real numbers from the reward calculation).
---
## 1. System: three-layer separation
```
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β AGENT (Qwen 2.5-3B + LoRA r=8, 4-bit) β
β β
β Input: prompt (state + history) β
β Output: "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK" β
β β β β β β
β social|morn|work action β
β belief|pref|pref β
βββββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
β N=8 completions per prompt
β (sampling temp=1.5)
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β ORCHESTRATION (TRL GRPOTrainer + Unsloth) β
β β
β β’ Picks 1 prompt from dataset (~3000 rows) β
β β’ Generates 8 completions β
β β’ Calls 4 reward functions in parallel β
β β’ Computes group-relative advantages β
β β’ Backprop on LoRA weights only (~30M) β
β β’ KL constraint to base Qwen (Ξ²=0.04) β
βββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
β env.reset(seed) β step(action)
β (replay-based reward)
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β ENVIRONMENT (RhythmEnvironment / FastAPI) β
β β
β reset(seed=42) β samples profile β
β step(action) β updates 5 meters, β
β returns observation β
β + per-step reward β
β β
β Lives at: huggingface.co/spaces/... β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
```
The agent never imports env code. They communicate via the OpenEnv
HTTP/WebSocket contract: `POST /reset`, `POST /step`, `GET /state`.
---
## 2. One episode = one week (28 steps)
```
ONE EPISODE = 1 WEEK = 28 STEPS
Day 1 (Mon) Day 2 (Tue) ... Day 7 (Sun)
βββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ βββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ βββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ¬ββββββ
β M β A β E β N β β M β A β E β N β .. β M β A β E β N β
β 0 β 1 β 2 β 3 β β 4 β 5 β 6 β 7 β β 24 β 25 β 26 β 27 β
βββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ βββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ βββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ΄ββββββ
β β β
reset() random event roll (8% per step) done=True
meters: V=0.7 meditate? deep_work? grader runs
C=0.7 P=0 S=0.7 sleep? socialize? final_score [0,1]
Cn=0.5
At each step the agent picks 1 of 10 actions:
ββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββ
β PRODUCTIVITY β RECOVERY β SOCIAL β LEISURE β
ββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββ€
β DEEP_WORK β SLEEP β FAMILY_TIME β ME_TIME β
β ADMIN_WORK β EXERCISE β SOCIALIZE β BINGE_WATCH β
β LEARN β MEDITATE β β β
ββββββββββββββββββ΄ββββββββββββββββββ΄ββββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββ
Time-of-day multipliers (apply to action effects):
Morning (M): cognition gains Γ 1.2 vitality drain Γ 0.8
Afternoon (A): cognition gains Γ 1.0 vitality drain Γ 1.0
Evening (E): cognition gains Γ 0.8 vitality drain Γ 1.1
Night (N): cognition gains Γ 0.6 vitality drain Γ 1.3
(sleep BYPASSES these multipliers)
Critical thresholds:
Any meter < 0.1 at end of step β -0.30 reward penalty (one per meter)
Connection decays passively every step (-0.01 to -0.02 per profile)
```
---
## 3. State tree: what the env tracks (and what's hidden)
```
RhythmEnvironment instance state
β
βββ _profile βββββ HIDDEN from agent ββββββββββ
β β β
β βββ name: "sampled_42" β
β βββ reward_weights: β
β β {V: 0.05, C: 0.05, P: 0.30, β
β β S: 0.20, Cn: 0.40} β
β β β Used INTERNALLY
β βββ social_vitality_multiplier: 1.8 β to compute reward
β βββ morning_cognition_bonus: 1.5 β and modify action
β βββ evening_night_cognition_bonus: None β effects.
β βββ morning_penalty: None β Belief reward
β βββ binge_shame: False β rewards INFERRING
β βββ progress_serenity_bonus: 0.04 β this profile.
β βββ idle_serenity_decay: 0.02 β
β βββ vitality_decay_rate: 0.01 β
β βββ stress_tolerance: 0.22 β
β βββ event_impact_multiplier: 0.7 β
β βββ connection_decay_rate: 0.012 β
β βββ solo_serenity_bonus: 0.05 β
β βββ social_connection_multiplier: 1.4 β
β βββ social_serenity_bonus: 0.03 β
β βββ work_vitality_recovery: 0.03 β
β βββ (14 hidden parameters total) β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
β Reduces to a 3-D BELIEF VECTOR (the inference target):
β profile_to_belief_vector(profile) β [0.30, 0.70, 0.50]
β β β β
β β β work_pref
β β morning_pref
β social_pref
β
βββ meters βββββββ visible to agent βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β βββ _vitality: 0.62 (range 0β1) β
β βββ _cognition: 0.51 β
β βββ _progress: 0.24 β Agent
β βββ _serenity: 0.71 β observes
β βββ _connection: 0.38 β in prompt
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββ _timestep: 5
β
βββ _step_history: list[StepRecord] βββ visible to agent βββββββ
β βββ (last 7 steps) β
β β step 0: deep_work β +0.42 β
β β deltas: V-0.10 C-0.12 P+0.18 S-0.05 Cn+0.00 β
β β anomalies: V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.06 S+0.00 Cn+0.00 ββ profile fingerprint
β β step 1: sleep β +0.18 β
β β deltas: V+0.20 C+0.10 P+0.00 S+0.05 Cn+0.00 β
β β anomalies: V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.00 S+0.00 Cn+0.00 β
β β ... β
β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββ _step_rewards: [+0.42, +0.18, +0.31, +0.55, ...]
βββ used by grader to compute adaptation_score (late-half - early-half)
```
---
## 4. What the agent sees (concrete prompt)
```
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ SYSTEM PROMPT ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β You are a life-management agent helping a person whose preferences are HIDDEN. β
β Each step, output ONE LINE in this exact format: β
β S M W ACTION_NAME β
β S = social pref (0=hates, 9=loves), M = morning, W = work β
β ACTION_NAME β {DEEP_WORK, ADMIN_WORK, LEARN, SLEEP, EXERCISE, MEDITATE, β
β FAMILY_TIME, SOCIALIZE, ME_TIME, BINGE_WATCH} β
β Example: 3 8 7 DEEP_WORK β
β Tactics: probe early, exploit late; don't repeat actions; ... β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ USER PROMPT βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Step: 5/28 (Tuesday Afternoon) β
β Remaining steps: 22 β
β β
β Meters: β
β Vitality: 0.62 β
β Cognition: 0.51 β
β Progress: 0.24 β
β Serenity: 0.71 β
β Connection: 0.38 β
β β
β Recent history (anom = how this person deviated from neutral baseline): β
β step 0: deep_work -> reward +0.42 (V-0.10 C-0.12 P+0.18 S-0.05 Cn+0.00) β
β [anom V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.06 S+0.00 Cn+0.00] β
β step 1: sleep -> reward +0.18 (V+0.20 C+0.10 P+0.00 S+0.05 Cn+0.00) β
β [anom V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.00 S+0.00 Cn+0.00] β
β step 2: socialize -> reward -0.05 (V-0.11 C-0.03 P+0.00 S+0.04 Cn+0.17) β
β [anom V-0.05 C+0.00 P+0.00 S+0.00 Cn+0.05] β strong profile signal β
β step 3: meditate -> reward +0.30 (V+0.03 C+0.08 P+0.00 S+0.20 Cn+0.00) β
β [anom V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.00 S+0.05 Cn+0.00] β solo bonus visible β
β step 4: deep_work -> reward +0.18 (V-0.06 C-0.06 P+0.18 S+0.04 Cn+0.00) β
β [anom V+0.00 C+0.00 P+0.00 S+0.00 Cn+0.00] β
β β
β Output your belief, then your action (format: S M W ACTION_NAME): β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
LLM completion (1 of 8 sampled at temp=1.5):
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK" β
ββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββ
βΌ
Parsed: belief = [0.33, 0.78, 0.56]
action = DEEP_WORK
```
---
## 5. The reward stack (4 layers, with concrete values for the example above)
```
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Completion: "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK" β
β for prompt above (seed=42, step 5) β
βββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββ
β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β β
βΌ βΌ βΌ
ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββ
β format_valid β β action_legal β β env_reward β
ββββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β parses? β β action β 10 ? β β env.replay(seed=42,β
β has belief? β β β β step5, action) β
β β β DEEP_WORK β β β β
β β +1.0 β β reward 0.0 β β deltas: β
β Γ wt 0.05 β β Γ wt 0.05 β β V-0.10 C-0.12 β
β β β β β P+0.18 S-0.05 β
β β +0.05 β β β 0.00 β β Cn+0.00 β
ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββ β β
β profile_reward = β
β sum(deltas Γ β
β prof_weights) β
β Γ 15 β
β = (-0.10Γ0.05 β
β + -0.12Γ0.05 β
β + 0.18Γ0.30 β
β + -0.05Γ0.20 β
β + 0Γ0.40) Γ 15 β
β = +0.65 β
β β
β + grader_bias: β
β 0.5Γ0.18+0.4Γ0 β
β = +0.09 β
β + new-action: +0.07β
β + b-act coupling: β
β work=0.56 (mid), β
β no bonus = 0 β
β - cycle pen: 0 β
β - rep pen: 0 β
β β
β env_reward = +0.81 β
β Γ wt 1.5 = +1.21 β
ββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
β
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β belief_accuracy β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β true belief (sampled_42) β
β = [0.30, 0.70, 0.50] β
β agent belief β
β = [0.33, 0.78, 0.56] β
β β
β MAE = (0.03 + 0.08 + 0.06) β
β / 3 = 0.057 β
β similarity = 0.943 β
β β
β baseline (constant 0.5): β
β MAE = (0.20+0.20+0.00)/3 β
β = 0.133 β
β similarity = 0.867 β
β β
β reward = 0.943 - 0.867 β
β = +0.076 β
β Γ wt 3.0 = +0.23 β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Ξ£ TOTAL REWARD (this completion)
= 0.05 + 0.00 + 1.21 + 0.23
= +1.49
```
---
## 6. GRPO update step (8 completions β 1 gradient update)
```
ONE TRAINING STEP (one row from the dataset β one gradient update)
ββ pick prompt βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β prompt#1247 from dataset: β
β state: step 5, seed=42, history=[deep_work, sleep, ...] β
βββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βΌ generate 8 completions @ temp=1.5
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β c1: "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK" β reward +1.49 β
β c2: "5 5 5 SLEEP" β reward -0.21 (constant belief: -0.03 β
β + sleep replay: -0.18) β
β c3: "3 6 4 ADMIN_WORK" β reward +1.10 β
β c4: "4 7 6 LEARN" β reward +1.32 β
β c5: "2 8 3 MEDITATE" β reward +0.45 (rep pen: -0.10 since β
β meditate at step 3 too) β
β c6: "3 7 7 DEEP_WORK" β reward +1.55 (belief slightly better) β
β c7: "5 5 5 EXERCISE" β reward -0.15 β
β c8: "4 6 5 FAMILY_TIME" β reward +0.92 β
β β
β group_mean = +0.81 β
βββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βΌ advantages = reward - group_mean
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β ADVANTAGE (this is what GRPO actually backprops on) β
β c1: +0.68 β strongly preferred β
β c2: -1.02 β strongly discouraged (constant belief) β
β c3: +0.29 β
β c4: +0.51 β
β c5: -0.36 β
β c6: +0.74 β most preferred β
β c7: -0.96 β
β c8: +0.11 β
β β
β KEY INSIGHT: only the SPREAD matters. If all 8 had the β
β same reward, advantages would all be 0 β no gradient. β
β This is why iter 1 mode-collapsed: format_valid +1.0 for β
β every completion meant zero variance from that layer. β
βββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βΌ policy loss = -E[ adv Γ log_prob(completion) ]
β + Ξ² Γ KL(policy || base_qwen)
β
βΌ backprop (only LoRA weights, ~30M params)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Model nudge: β
β push: "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK"-like outputs UP β
β push: "3 7 7 DEEP_WORK"-like outputs UP β
β pull: "5 5 5 *"-like outputs DOWN β
β β
β KL constraint: prevents the policy from diverging too β
β far from base Qwen (avoids gibberish drift). β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Repeat 800-2000 times. Each step ~3-5 sec on A100.
```
---
## 7. The dataset is just starting positions (not labels)
```
DATASET (~3000 rows, generated ONCE before training)
For 200-300 episodes:
env.reset(seed=N)
for step in range(28):
record {
prompt: [system, user_for_this_state],
seed: N, ββββ replay metadata
step_index: <current step>,
action_history: <actions taken so far>,
profile_mode: "continuous",
}
env.step(rollout_policy(obs)) ββ rollout=heuristic OR random
(only matters for STATE diversity,
the agent's training generations
REPLACE these actions)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β A row from the dataset: β
β { β
β prompt: [...full state at step 5 of episode seed=42...] β
β seed: 42, β
β step_index: 5, β
β action_history: ["deep_work", "sleep", "socialize", β
β "meditate", "deep_work"], β
β profile_mode: "continuous" β
β } β
β β
β NOTE: NO "correct action" or "label" anywhere. β
β The reward function reconstructs the env from this metadata β
β and scores whatever action the LLM picks. β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
This is fundamentally different from supervised learning:
- Supervised: (input, target_output) β model learns to mimic target
- GRPO: (prompt, replay_metadata) β model learns to maximize reward
```
---
## 8. Final episode grader (only fires at step 28)
```
_grade_episode() β runs at done=True
ββββββββββββββββ
β final_score β
β β [0, 1] β
ββββββββ¬ββββββββ
ββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββ
β β β β β β
βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ
ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ
β crash_free β β progress β β connectionβ β adaptation β β efficiency β β belief β
β Γ 0.15 β β Γ 0.20 β β Γ 0.10 β β Γ 0.25 β β Γ 0.10 β β accuracy β
β β β β β β β β β β β Γ 0.20 β
ββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββ€ ββββββββββββββ€
β 1 - crashesβ β final P β β final Cn β β late-half β β avg_reward β β 1 - MAE β
β /total_ck β β value β β value β β mean rewardβ β normalized β β vs true β
β β β β β β β - early β β to [0,1] β β profile β
β e.g. 0.95 β β e.g. 0.42 β β e.g. 0.51β β e.g. +0.18 β β e.g. 0.55 β β e.g. 0.80 β
β Γ0.15=0.14 β β Γ0.20=0.084β β Γ0.10=0.05β β Γ0.25=0.045β β Γ0.10=0.055β β Γ0.20=0.16 β
ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββ
Ξ£ = 0.14 + 0.084 + 0.05 + 0.045 + 0.055 + 0.16
= 0.534 β final_score (with inference)
Heuristic / random baselines never call env.record_belief(), so the belief
component scores 0 for them β by design: the meta-RL skill is INFERENCE,
and only agents that actually try get credit on this axis.
Plus a sparse terminal reward (added to step 27's per-step reward):
terminal_bonus = (final_score - 0.5) Γ 5 β e.g. (0.534 - 0.5) Γ 5 = +0.17
This means: at step 27, agent gets last per-step reward + bonus from grader.
This is the only direct gradient signal pointing at the actual episode quality.
```
---
## 9. Three eval conditions (post-training)
```
inference_eval.py runs ALL THREE
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β discrete-3-profiles β continuous-in-distributionβ continuous-OOD β
β (3 reference profiles) β (was the agent able to β (does meta-policy β
β β learn the meta-policy?) β generalize?) β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β env.reset(seed=N, β env.reset(seed=N) β env.reset(seed=10000+N) β
β profile="introvert_ β β samples from training β β samples from a region β
β morning") β distribution β never seen in trainingβ
β β β β
β β 3 hardcoded profiles β β ~10 sampled profiles β β ~10 sampled profiles β
β (from PROFILES list) β from seeds 100..110 β from seeds 10000..10010 β
β β β β
β Each strategy plays each β Each strategy plays each β Each strategy plays each β
β profile 5x = 15 episodes β seed 1x = 10 episodes β seed 1x = 10 episodes β
β β β β
β Strategies tested: β Strategies tested: β Strategies tested: β
β β’ random β β’ random β β’ random β
β β’ heuristic β β’ heuristic β β’ heuristic β
β β’ model (trained Qwen) β β’ model (trained Qwen) β β’ model (trained Qwen) β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
THE KEY METRIC: trained model's score on continuous-OOD vs heuristic baseline.
Heuristic baseline (profile-blind hand rules): score 0.580 on OOD.
Trained meta-RL agent's target: > 0.580 on OOD.
If the trained agent beats the heuristic on OOD (profiles never seen in
training), that's direct proof it learned the SKILL of profile inference,
not just memorized training profiles.
```
---
## 10. Sim β Real mapping (why this POC matters)
The whole point of training in this env is that the SKILL transfers. The
mapping from simulated signals to production signals is direct: same
information, different source.
```
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ SIMULATION (training) ββββββββ βββββ REAL PRODUCT (deployment) ββββββββ
β β β β
β meter: Vitality = 0.62 ββββΌββΊ HRV from watch + sleep score β
β meter: Cognition = 0.51 ββββΌββΊ focus app metrics + screen time β
β meter: Progress = 0.24 ββββΌββΊ calendar density + task completionβ
β meter: Serenity = 0.71 ββββΌββΊ HRV variability + voice sentiment β
β meter: Connection = 0.38 ββββΌββΊ call/message freq + calendar β
β β β β
β hidden profile (sampled per episode) ββββΌββΊ the real user's actual personalityβ
β ββ never visible to agent β β ββ also never visible β
β β β β
β agent emits: "3 7 5 DEEP_WORK" β β β
β ββ "3 7 5" = belief about user (hidden internal) ββββΌββΊ agent's internal user model β
β ββ "DEEP_WORK" = action choice ββββΌββΊ recommendation to user β
β β β ("I suggest a focus block now") β
β β β β
β per-step env_reward ββββΌββΊ meter trend + accept/ignore tap β
β ββ "did meters improve under profile weights?" β β ββ "did user accept and benefit?"β
β β β β
β episode = 1 week (28 steps) ββββΌββΊ rolling weekly window β
β β β β
β 3 eval conditions β β USER ARRIVES (cold start) β
β ββ discrete-3 (memorization check) β β ββ Agent has zero info about them β
β ββ continuous-in-dist (training-distrib) β β ββ ~5-10 interactions to converge β
β ββ continuous-OOD βββ KEY βββΊ ββββΌββΊ on a confident belief vector β
β agent must infer profile NEVER seen in β β ββ Acts on belief, learns from β
β training. THIS is the production scenario. β β tap responses β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
SUCCESS METRIC IN BOTH WORLDS: how fast does the agent personalize?
Sim: belief_accuracy curve over a single episode (does it climb?)
adaptation_score (late-half mean reward > early-half mean reward?)
Real: how many interactions until user's accept-rate stabilizes high?
How quickly does the agent stop suggesting things the user always ignores?
Both reduce to the same skill: form a model of this person from limited
observation, then act on it.
```
**Design choices that explicitly preserve the passive-only constraint:**
- β No "ASK USER" action β agent never quizzes
- β No profile feature in observation at eval time β agent must infer
- β No explicit "what's your goal?" prompt β only sensor-equivalent meters
- β
Belief output is INTERNAL (visible in POC only for training reward)
- β
Reward formula uses only quantities computable from passive signals
If the agent learns to do well on continuous-OOD (profiles never seen in
training), it has acquired the skill of "figure out a new person from
observation alone" β exactly the skill the production assistant needs
when meeting a real user for the first time.
---
## 11. Spend & timing (concrete)
```
HARDWARE: A100 large (80GB) on HF Jobs at $2.50/hr ($0.0417/min)
FAST_MODE (200-800 steps):
dataset gen: ~2 min
model load: ~3 min
training: ~10-25 min (depends on steps)
eval: ~3 min
plot + upload: ~2 min
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
total: 20-35 min ($0.80-1.50 per iter)
FULL RUN (2000 steps):
dataset gen: ~3 min
model load: ~3 min
training: ~60-90 min
eval: ~3 min
plot + upload: ~2 min
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
total: 70-100 min ($3-4)
Iter 1 (200 steps): $0.50 β mode collapse (single action)
Iter 2 (400 steps): $1.50 β mode collapse (2-cycle)
Iter 3 (800 steps): $5 β³ in flight (control)
Iter 4 (800 steps): $5 β³ in flight (with full fixes)
Final (2000 steps): $4 β³ pending iter 3+4 results
ββββββ
~$16 of $30 budget
```
|