Kunal commited on
Commit
29dcb75
·
1 Parent(s): 0411209

updated prompt for better results

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. Agent.py +18 -12
Agent.py CHANGED
@@ -203,23 +203,29 @@ def calculate_carbon_footprint(state: EnvironmentalAnalysisState):
203
 
204
  def generate_environmental_score(state: EnvironmentalAnalysisState):
205
  scoring_prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template("""
206
- Based on the following environmental data, generate a comprehensive environmental score (0-100):
207
 
208
  Product Data: {extracted_data}
209
  Carbon Footprint: {carbon_footprint} kg CO2e
210
 
211
- Consider these factors:
212
- 1. Carbon emissions intensity
213
- 2. Recyclability of materials
214
- 3. Manufacturing sustainability
215
- 4. Transportation impact
216
- 5. Product longevity
217
- 6. End-of-life disposal
218
 
219
- Provide:
220
- - Overall score (0-100, where 100 is most sustainable and 0 is least sustainable)
221
- - Category breakdown
222
- - Improvement recommendations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
223
  """)
224
 
225
  rendered_prompt_content = scoring_prompt.format(
 
203
 
204
  def generate_environmental_score(state: EnvironmentalAnalysisState):
205
  scoring_prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template("""
206
+ Based on the following environmental data, generate a comprehensive environmental score (0-100), aiming to reflect the product's commitment to sustainability.
207
 
208
  Product Data: {extracted_data}
209
  Carbon Footprint: {carbon_footprint} kg CO2e
210
 
211
+ **Scoring Guide:**
212
+ * **90-100 (Excellent/Leader):** Demonstrates exceptional environmental stewardship, innovative green practices, and minimal negative impact across all factors. A true leader in sustainability.
213
+ * **70-89 (Good/Above Average):** Shows strong environmental practices with notable positive attributes and efforts to reduce impact. Generally a good choice for sustainability.
214
+ * **40-69 (Average/Acceptable):** Meets basic environmental considerations but has significant areas for improvement. Represents typical industry practices without outstanding sustainable features.
215
+ * **0-39 (Poor/Concerning):** Significant environmental concerns, unsustainable practices, or a clear lack of attention to environmental impact.
 
 
216
 
217
+ **Consider these factors, focusing on identifying and rewarding positive environmental performance:**
218
+ 1. **Carbon Emissions Intensity:** Evaluate how effectively greenhouse gas emissions are minimized throughout the product's lifecycle (from raw materials to disposal).
219
+ 2. **Material Sustainability:** Assess the use of recycled, renewable, non-toxic, or sustainably sourced materials, and the efforts to reduce reliance on virgin resources.
220
+ 3. **Manufacturing Practices:** Examine the adoption of clean production methods, energy efficiency, water conservation, and waste reduction during the manufacturing process.
221
+ 4. **Supply Chain & Transportation Impact:** Analyze the efficiency and environmental footprint of sourcing raw materials and delivering the finished product (e.g., local sourcing, optimized logistics).
222
+ 5. **Product Durability & Longevity:** Determine if the product is designed for an extended lifespan, repairability, and reusability, thereby reducing premature obsolescence.
223
+ 6. **End-of-Life Management:** Review the effectiveness of strategies for recycling, composting, safe disposal, or circular economy integration once the product's useful life ends.
224
+
225
+ **Provide:**
226
+ - **Overall Score (0-100):** State the numerical score clearly.
227
+ - **Justification:** Explain the score by highlighting the product's **strengths and positive environmental attributes** that contributed to its rating. Also mention any significant weaknesses where applicable.
228
+ - **Improvement Recommendations:** Offer specific, actionable suggestions for how the product's environmental impact could be further reduced and its sustainability enhanced.
229
  """)
230
 
231
  rendered_prompt_content = scoring_prompt.format(