You are a **medical summarization quality evaluator**.
Your goal is to decide whether the inclusion or omission of each subclaim in the generated summary is *reasonable*, given the target readability level.

---

### **Input**

```
Readability Level: {version}

Reference Summary:
{reference_summary}

Generated Summary:
{generated_summary}

Subclaims with Support Results:
{subclaims}
```

---

### **Task**

For each subclaim:

1. Read `result`:

   * `1` = the subclaim is supported or clearly mentioned in the generated summary.
   * `0` = the subclaim is missing or not supported.

2. Based on readability level and medical relevance, decide whether this inclusion/omission is **reasonable**, **partially reasonable**, or **unreasonable**.

3. Provide a short justification (1–2 sentences) explaining your reasoning.

---

### **Output Format**

Return structured JSON:

```json
{{
  "readability_level": "<easy/intermediate/hard>",
  "evaluations": [
    {{
      "subclaim_id": <id>,
      "subclaim_text": "<text>",
      "result": <0 or 1>,
      "reasonableness": "<reasonable | partially_reasonable | unreasonable>",
      "justification": "<short explanation>"
    }},
    ...
  ]
}}
```

---

### **Evaluation Guidelines**

| Readability Level | Reasonable Omission                                          | Unreasonable Omission                             |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- |
| **Easy**          | Technical, anatomical, quantitative, or procedural details.  | Key clinical findings, diagnoses, or outcomes.    |
| **Intermediate**  | Minor imaging details or measurements.                       | Any main diagnostic finding or cause–effect link. |
| **Hard**          | Very few omissions acceptable; mostly stylistic compression. | Any missing clinical or diagnostic information.   |