Safetensors
English
qwen3_5
judge
b2b-sales
orpo
lora
preference-learning
tenacious-bench
evaluation
qwen2.5
unsloth
Instructions to use rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Local Apps
- Unsloth Studio new
How to use rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter with Unsloth Studio:
Install Unsloth Studio (macOS, Linux, WSL)
curl -fsSL https://unsloth.ai/install.sh | sh # Run unsloth studio unsloth studio -H 0.0.0.0 -p 8888 # Then open http://localhost:8888 in your browser # Search for rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter to start chatting
Install Unsloth Studio (Windows)
irm https://unsloth.ai/install.ps1 | iex # Run unsloth studio unsloth studio -H 0.0.0.0 -p 8888 # Then open http://localhost:8888 in your browser # Search for rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter to start chatting
Using HuggingFace Spaces for Unsloth
# No setup required # Open https://huggingface.co/spaces/unsloth/studio in your browser # Search for rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter to start chatting
Load model with FastModel
pip install unsloth from unsloth import FastModel model, tokenizer = FastModel.from_pretrained( model_name="rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter", max_seq_length=2048, )
File size: 16,463 Bytes
c4b7766 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 | #!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Day 6 — Run ablations on held-out partition.
Three conditions:
Condition 1 (baseline): Week 10 raw scoring_evaluator output, no judge
Condition 2 (trained): Trained LoRA judge from training/adapter/
Condition 3 (prompt_only): Qwen 2.5 1.5B with no LoRA, best prompt
Writes:
ablations/ablation_results.json
ablations/held_out_traces.jsonl
"""
import json
import os
import sys
import time
import datetime
import statistics
from pathlib import Path
import requests
from bootstrap_test import paired_bootstrap
ROOT = Path(__file__).parent.parent
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT))
from scoring_evaluator import score_task
HELD_OUT_PATH = ROOT / "tenacious_bench_v0.1/held_out/tasks.jsonl"
HF_JUDGE_MODEL = "rafiakedir/tenacious-bench-adapter" # merged model on HuggingFace
TRACES_PATH = Path(__file__).parent / "held_out_traces.jsonl"
RESULTS_PATH = Path(__file__).parent / "ablation_results.json"
COST_LOG = ROOT / "cost_log.csv"
OPENROUTER_KEY = ""
DEEPSEEK_MODEL = "deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3-0324"
JUDGE_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """You are a Tenacious Consulting sales judge. Evaluate the following B2B outbound sales email on these four rubric dimensions:
1. SIGNAL_GROUNDING_FIDELITY: Does the email only assert claims supported by the hiring signal brief? Use assertive language for high-confidence signals, questions for low-confidence ones.
2. BENCH_COMMITMENT_HONESTY: Does the email avoid committing more engineers than available on bench?
3. ICP_SEGMENT_APPROPRIATENESS: Does the email use language matching the correct ICP segment (growth/scale for Segment 1, cost/efficiency for Segment 2, transition/leadership for Segment 3, hedged for ABSTAIN)?
4. TONE_PRESERVATION: Does the email avoid banned re-engagement clichés, over-apologetic language, and include a 30-minute scoping CTA with a direct opener?
Additional Tenacious tone markers:
- No "just wanted to circle back", "touching base", "hope you're doing well"
- No "I apologize for taking your time", "we may not be the best fit"
- Must include calendar CTA: "30-minute scoping conversation" or equivalent
- No fabricated competitor claims
Score each dimension 0.0 to 1.0. Return ONLY a JSON object:
{"signal_grounding": <0-1>, "bench_honesty": <0-1>, "icp_segment": <0-1>, "tone": <0-1>, "overall": <0-1>, "reasoning": "<one sentence>"}"""
def _load_env():
env_path = ROOT / ".env"
if env_path.exists():
for line in env_path.read_text().splitlines():
line = line.strip()
if "=" in line and not line.startswith("#"):
k, v = line.split("=", 1)
os.environ.setdefault(k.strip(), v.strip().strip('"'))
def call_openrouter(messages: list, model: str, max_tokens: int = 200) -> tuple[str, int, float]:
url = "https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions"
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ.get('OPENROUTER_API_KEY', '')}",
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"HTTP-Referer": "https://github.com/rafiakedir/tenacious-bench",
}
body = {"model": model, "messages": messages, "max_tokens": max_tokens, "temperature": 0.0}
t0 = time.time()
resp = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=body, timeout=60)
latency_ms = int((time.time() - t0) * 1000)
try:
data = resp.json()
usage = data.get("usage", {})
prompt_toks = usage.get("prompt_tokens", 0)
comp_toks = usage.get("completion_tokens", 0)
cost = 0.0
if "deepseek" in model.lower():
cost = (prompt_toks * 0.14 + comp_toks * 0.28) / 1000000
else:
cost = (prompt_toks * 0.40 + comp_toks * 0.40) / 1000000
return data["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip(), latency_ms, cost
except Exception:
return "[failed]", latency_ms, 0.0
def load_held_out_tasks():
tasks = []
with open(HELD_OUT_PATH) as f:
for line in f:
tasks.append(json.loads(line))
return tasks
def generate_candidate_if_missing(task: dict) -> tuple[str, float]:
"""If task has no candidate_output, generate one with DeepSeek."""
if task.get("candidate_output"):
return task["candidate_output"], 0.0
inp = task.get("input", {})
hsb = inp.get("hiring_signal_brief")
bs = inp.get("bench_summary")
task_type = task.get("task_type", "email_generation")
brief_text = json.dumps(hsb or bs or {}, indent=2)[:800]
msg = [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a Tenacious Consulting sales agent writing B2B outreach emails."},
{"role": "user", "content": f"Write a {task_type} email for this prospect:\n{brief_text}\n\nKeep it under 120 words with a 30-minute scoping CTA."},
]
try:
text, _, cost = call_openrouter(msg, DEEPSEEK_MODEL, max_tokens=300)
return text, cost
except Exception as e:
return f"[generation failed: {e}]", 0.0
def score_with_evaluator(task: dict, candidate_output: str) -> dict:
"""Condition 1: machine-verifiable scoring_evaluator only."""
t = {**task, "candidate_output": candidate_output}
result = score_task(t)
return {
"signal_grounding": result.get("score", 0.0),
"bench_honesty": result.get("score", 0.0),
"icp_segment": result.get("score", 0.0),
"tone": result.get("score", 0.0),
"overall": result.get("score", 0.0),
"passed": result.get("passed", False),
"rubric_score": result.get("score", 0.0),
}
def score_with_prompt_judge(task: dict, candidate_output: str) -> tuple[dict, int, float]:
"""Condition 3: zero-shot Qwen judge via OpenRouter (Qwen3-30B)."""
inp = task.get("input", {})
brief = json.dumps(inp.get("hiring_signal_brief") or inp.get("bench_summary") or {})[:600]
prompt = f"""TASK INPUT:
{brief}
CANDIDATE EMAIL:
{candidate_output[:600]}
Score this email on all four rubric dimensions."""
msg = [
{"role": "system", "content": JUDGE_SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{"role": "user", "content": prompt},
]
try:
text, latency_ms, cost = call_openrouter(msg, "qwen/qwen3-30b-a3b", max_tokens=200)
# Extract JSON from response
import re
json_match = re.search(r'\{[^}]+\}', text, re.DOTALL)
if json_match:
scores = json.loads(json_match.group())
else:
scores = {"overall": 0.5, "reasoning": "parse_error"}
scores["raw_response"] = text[:200]
return scores, latency_ms, cost
except Exception as e:
return {"overall": 0.5, "error": str(e)}, 0, 0.0
TRAINED_MODEL = None
TRAINED_TOKENIZER = None
JUDGE_SYSTEM_FOR_TRAINED = (
"You are a rubric-aware judge for Tenacious Consulting B2B outbound sales emails. "
"Given a task context and a candidate email, score the email on the specified rubric "
"dimension. Respond with a JSON object only:\n"
'{"dimension": "<dim>", "score": <0.0-1.0>, "pass": <true|false>, "reasoning": "<one sentence>"}'
)
def _load_trained_model():
"""Load merged judge model from HuggingFace (once, cached in module globals)."""
global TRAINED_MODEL, TRAINED_TOKENIZER
if TRAINED_MODEL is not None:
return TRAINED_MODEL, TRAINED_TOKENIZER
try:
import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
print(f" Loading trained judge from {HF_JUDGE_MODEL}...")
TRAINED_TOKENIZER = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(HF_JUDGE_MODEL)
TRAINED_MODEL = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
HF_JUDGE_MODEL,
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto",
)
TRAINED_MODEL.eval()
print(f" Trained judge loaded")
return TRAINED_MODEL, TRAINED_TOKENIZER
except Exception as e:
print(f" Could not load trained judge from HF: {e}")
return None, None
def score_with_trained_judge(task: dict, candidate_output: str) -> tuple[dict, int, float]:
"""Condition 2: merged judge model loaded from HuggingFace."""
import re, torch
model, tokenizer = _load_trained_model()
if model is None:
# Graceful fallback — mark clearly so results aren't confused with trained scores
return {"overall": 0.5, "error": "hf_model_unavailable", "note": "judge not loaded"}, 0, 0.0
dim = task.get("dimension", "signal_grounding_fidelity")
inp = task.get("input", {})
brief = json.dumps(
inp.get("hiring_signal_brief") or inp.get("bench_summary") or {}
)[:600]
user_content = (
f"EVALUATION DIMENSION: {dim}\n\n"
f"TASK CONTEXT:\n{brief}\n\n"
f"CANDIDATE EMAIL:\n{candidate_output.strip()[:500]}\n\n"
f"Score this email on the {dim} dimension."
)
msgs = [
{"role": "system", "content": JUDGE_SYSTEM_FOR_TRAINED},
{"role": "user", "content": user_content},
]
text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(msgs, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
t0 = time.time()
with torch.no_grad():
output = model.generate(
**inputs, max_new_tokens=150, temperature=0.1, do_sample=True,
pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id,
)
latency_ms = int((time.time() - t0) * 1000)
generated = tokenizer.decode(output[0][inputs.input_ids.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)
json_match = re.search(r'\{[^}]+\}', generated, re.DOTALL)
if json_match:
try:
scores = json.loads(json_match.group())
scores["overall"] = scores.get("score", 0.5)
return scores, latency_ms, 0.0
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass
return {"overall": 0.5, "reasoning": "parse_error", "raw": generated[:200]}, latency_ms, 0.0
def append_trace(entry: dict):
with open(TRACES_PATH, "a") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(entry) + "\n")
def condition_baseline(tasks: list) -> list:
"""Condition 1: scoring_evaluator only, no judge."""
print("\n=== CONDITION 1: Baseline (scoring_evaluator) ===")
results = []
for i, task in enumerate(tasks):
t0 = time.time()
candidate, cost_gen = generate_candidate_if_missing(task)
scores = score_with_evaluator(task, candidate)
latency_ms = int((time.time() - t0) * 1000)
entry = {
"task_id": task["task_id"],
"condition": "baseline",
"candidate_output": candidate[:300],
"score": scores,
"latency_ms": latency_ms,
"cost_usd": cost_gen,
}
append_trace(entry)
results.append(scores.get("overall", 0.0))
print(f" [{i+1}/{len(tasks)}] {task['task_id']} score={scores.get('overall',0):.3f}")
return results
def condition_trained_judge(tasks: list) -> list:
"""Condition 2: trained LoRA adapter."""
print("\n=== CONDITION 2: Trained Judge (LoRA adapter) ===")
results = []
for i, task in enumerate(tasks):
t0 = time.time()
candidate, cost_gen = generate_candidate_if_missing(task)
scores, latency_ms, cost_judge = score_with_trained_judge(task, candidate)
# Blend with machine scorer for reliability
machine_scores = score_with_evaluator(task, candidate)
blended_overall = 0.6 * scores.get("overall", 0.5) + 0.4 * machine_scores.get("overall", 0.5)
scores["blended_overall"] = round(blended_overall, 4)
scores["machine_score"] = machine_scores.get("overall", 0.5)
entry = {
"task_id": task["task_id"],
"condition": "trained",
"candidate_output": candidate[:300],
"score": scores,
"latency_ms": latency_ms,
"cost_usd": cost_gen + cost_judge,
}
append_trace(entry)
results.append(blended_overall)
print(f" [{i+1}/{len(tasks)}] {task['task_id']} overall={blended_overall:.3f}")
return results
def condition_prompt_only(tasks: list) -> list:
"""Condition 3: Qwen3 with prompt-engineered judge, no training."""
print("\n=== CONDITION 3: Prompt-Only Judge (Qwen3-30B) ===")
results = []
for i, task in enumerate(tasks):
t0 = time.time()
candidate, cost_gen = generate_candidate_if_missing(task)
scores, latency_ms, cost_judge = score_with_prompt_judge(task, candidate)
# Blend with machine scorer
machine_scores = score_with_evaluator(task, candidate)
blended_overall = 0.6 * scores.get("overall", 0.5) + 0.4 * machine_scores.get("overall", 0.5)
scores["blended_overall"] = round(blended_overall, 4)
scores["machine_score"] = machine_scores.get("overall", 0.5)
entry = {
"task_id": task["task_id"],
"condition": "prompt_only",
"candidate_output": candidate[:300],
"score": scores,
"latency_ms": latency_ms,
"cost_usd": cost_gen + cost_judge,
}
append_trace(entry)
results.append(blended_overall)
print(f" [{i+1}/{len(tasks)}] {task['task_id']} overall={blended_overall:.3f}")
return results
def main():
_load_env()
tasks = load_held_out_tasks()
print(f"Loaded {len(tasks)} held-out tasks")
# Clear traces file
TRACES_PATH.unlink(missing_ok=True)
baseline_scores = condition_baseline(tasks)
trained_scores = condition_trained_judge(tasks)
prompt_scores = condition_prompt_only(tasks)
def summarize(scores: list) -> dict:
if not scores:
return {"mean": 0, "std": 0, "min": 0, "max": 0, "p95": 0}
return {
"mean": round(statistics.mean(scores), 4),
"std": round(statistics.stdev(scores) if len(scores) > 1 else 0, 4),
"min": round(min(scores), 4),
"max": round(max(scores), 4),
"p95": round(sorted(scores)[int(0.95 * len(scores))], 4),
"n": len(scores),
}
# Compute latencies from traces
traces = []
with open(TRACES_PATH) as f:
for line in f:
traces.append(json.loads(line))
def latency_p95(condition: str) -> int:
lats = [t["latency_ms"] for t in traces if t["condition"] == condition]
if not lats:
return 0
return sorted(lats)[int(0.95 * len(lats))]
def cost_p95(condition: str) -> float:
costs = [t.get("cost_usd", 0.0) for t in traces if t["condition"] == condition]
if not costs:
return 0.0
return round(sorted(costs)[int(0.95 * len(costs))], 5)
delta_a_boot = paired_bootstrap(trained_scores, baseline_scores)
delta_a_boot["description"] = "trained judge vs baseline"
delta_b_boot = paired_bootstrap(trained_scores, prompt_scores)
delta_b_boot["description"] = "trained judge vs prompt-only"
delta_c_boot = paired_bootstrap(prompt_scores, baseline_scores)
delta_c_boot["description"] = "prompt-only vs baseline"
results = {
"timestamp": datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"held_out_task_count": len(tasks),
"baseline": {**summarize(baseline_scores), "p95_latency_ms": latency_p95("baseline"), "p95_cost_usd": cost_p95("baseline")},
"trained": {**summarize(trained_scores), "p95_latency_ms": latency_p95("trained"), "p95_cost_usd": cost_p95("trained")},
"prompt_only": {**summarize(prompt_scores), "p95_latency_ms": latency_p95("prompt_only"), "p95_cost_usd": cost_p95("prompt_only")},
"delta_a": delta_a_boot,
"delta_b": delta_b_boot,
"delta_c": delta_c_boot,
}
with open(RESULTS_PATH, "w") as f:
json.dump(results, f, indent=2)
print(f"\n=== ABLATION RESULTS ===")
print(f"Baseline mean: {results['baseline']['mean']:.4f}")
print(f"Trained mean: {results['trained']['mean']:.4f}")
print(f"Prompt mean: {results['prompt_only']['mean']:.4f}")
print(f"Delta A (trained vs baseline): {results['delta_a']['mean_diff']:+.4f} (p={results['delta_a']['p_value']:.4f})")
print(f"Delta B (trained vs prompt): {results['delta_b']['mean_diff']:+.4f} (p={results['delta_b']['p_value']:.4f})")
print(f"Delta C (prompt vs baseline): {results['delta_c']['mean_diff']:+.4f} (p={results['delta_c']['p_value']:.4f})")
print(f"\nResults written to {RESULTS_PATH}")
print(f"Traces written to {TRACES_PATH}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|