ghost-plantain probe results README

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+---
+language: en
+license: apache-2.0
+base_model: black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-klein-base-4B
+library_name: diffusers
+tags:
+  - interpretability
+  - per-head-attention
+  - paired-prompt-probe
+  - flux2
+  - vision-banana
+  - arxiv:2604.20329
+pipeline_tag: image-to-image
+---
+
+# ghost-plantain
+
+A per-head attention probe of FLUX.2 Klein 4B testing whether the base model represents amodal completion (the entire object including its occluded extent) as a separable axis from modal description (visible portion only) on identical occluder relationships.
+
+## Thesis
+
+Amodal completion — the perceptual operation of inferring an object's full extent from its partial visibility — is a primitive of biological vision long predating deep learning. Whether image-generation models recover an explicit modal/amodal distinction at the representational level is a more specific question than whether they can render hidden portions of objects on demand. ghost-plantain tests whether Klein has a per-head representational axis that systematically responds to the modal-vs-amodal scope of a request, on otherwise identical scene descriptions.
+
+## Method
+
+Twenty-five paired prompts holding the depicted scene constant. The A condition (modal) describes the visible portion only ("show only the visible part of the apple behind the cup"). The B condition (amodal) requests the entire object including the occluded extent ("show the entire apple including the part hidden behind the cup"). Per-head capture protocol identical to the rest of the plantain probe family.
+
+Rigor add-ons: per-head Cohen's d effect size; split-half consistency via 100 random 50/50 stimulus splits.
+
+## Results
+
+| Metric                         | Value           | Significance              |
+|--------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------|
+| Heads with \|t\| > 3           | 6,399 (39.2%)   | 8.7× empirical null p99   |
+| Heads with \|t\| > 5           | 2,537 (15.6%)   | 507× empirical null p99   |
+| Heads with \|d\| > 0.8 (large) | 4,128 (25.3%)   | —                         |
+| Split-half r (median)          | 0.833           | [0.82, 0.84] IQR          |
+| Max \|t\|                      | 29.63           | —                         |
+
+**Top blocks by max \|t\|:**
+- joint[4]: max\|t\|=29.63, 132/192 heads at \|t\|>3, median \|d\|=1.06
+- single[0]: max\|t\|=24.98, 406/768 heads at \|t\|>3, median \|d\|=0.65
+- joint[2]: max\|t\|=24.97, 127/192 heads at \|t\|>3, median \|d\|=1.21
+- joint[3]: max\|t\|=23.95, 139/192 heads at \|t\|>3, median \|d\|=1.10
+- joint[1]: max\|t\|=22.52, 130/192 heads at \|t\|>3, median \|d\|=0.92
+
+**Interpretation.** The axis is strong (507× null at |t|>5) and highly stable (split-half r=0.83). Signal concentrates in joint MMDiT blocks (4 of the top 5 are joint), the cross-attention surface where text-image fusion occurs — consistent with the modal/amodal distinction being routed primarily through how the request modifies the text-image binding, not through a downstream image-only computation. The joint-block median Cohen's d ≥ 1.0 across the top blocks indicates that within those blocks the modal/amodal distinction is the dominant feature partition, not just one signal among many. A quarter of all 16,320 attention heads in the model show large-effect-size selectivity for this axis.
+
+## Status
+
+Probe complete. No LoRA training; this is a base-model interpretability finding.
+
+## Limitations
+
+The amodal phrasing ("the entire object including the hidden part") is linguistically marked; the modal phrasing ("the visible portion only") is a partial description. A residual contributor to the per-head signal could be the model encoding "complete vs. partial scope of request" rather than amodal completion specifically. A follow-up could pair an amodal request against a different complete-scope description (e.g., "the visible portion of the apple from a different angle") to disentangle.
+
+Twenty-five pairs is small; the per-head t-vector reproducibility (r=0.83) is high but a larger pair count would tighten estimates.
+
+The probe is correlational.
+
+## License
+
+Apache 2.0 — matches base FLUX.2 Klein 4B.
+
+## References
+
+- Gabeur, V., Long, S., Peng, S., et al. *Image Generators are Generalist Vision Learners.* [arXiv:2604.20329](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20329) (2026).
+- Black Forest Labs. *FLUX.2 Klein.* https://bfl.ai/models/flux-2-klein (2025).