Papers
arxiv:2604.13151

Exploration and Exploitation Errors Are Measurable for Language Model Agents

Published on Apr 14
· Submitted by
Jaden Park
on Apr 16
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Controllable environments with programmable exploration-exploitation balance are designed to evaluate language model agents' performance on embodied AI tasks, revealing distinct failure modes and demonstrating that reasoning models outperform other approaches.

AI-generated summary

Language Model (LM) agents are increasingly used in complex open-ended decision-making tasks, from AI coding to physical AI. A core requirement in these settings is the ability to both explore the problem space and exploit acquired knowledge effectively. However, systematically distinguishing and quantifying exploration and exploitation from observed actions without access to the agent's internal policy remains challenging. To address this, we design controllable environments inspired by practical embodied AI scenarios. Each environment consists of a partially observable 2D grid map and an unknown task Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The map generation can be programmatically adjusted to emphasize exploration or exploitation difficulty. To enable policy-agnostic evaluation, we design a metric to quantify exploration and exploitation errors from agent's actions. We evaluate a variety of frontier LM agents and find that even state-of-the-art models struggle on our task, with different models exhibiting distinct failure modes. We further observe that reasoning models solve the task more effectively and show both exploration and exploitation can be significantly improved through minimal harness engineering. We release our code https://github.com/jjj-madison/measurable-explore-exploit{here}.

Community

Paper submitter

We introduce a novel policy-agnostic metric that quantifies exploration and exploitation errors of LM agents, measured entirely from observed actions alone without requiring access to the agent's internal policy. Our framework pairs partially observable 2D grid maps with symbolic task DAGs, where the LM agent must explore to discover information about the task and exploit its knowledge to achieve the goal node. Our framework detects structurally redundant behavior within no-progress segments using tools from classical graph exploration theory. Errors are attributed to exploration, exploitation or both based on the map state at each timestep. Evaluating 13 frontier LMs across Claude, Gemini, GPT, and GPT-OSS, we find that exploration error strongly predicts success (R² = 0.947) while exploitation error does not (R² = 0.006), that models with identical success rates exhibit qualitatively different behaviors, and that minimal harness engineering -- providing structured summaries of past observations -- boosts success rates by up to 29%. We fully open-source our code, prompts, and task generation parameters.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2604.13151
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.13151 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.13151 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.13151 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.