Upload aco/verifier_budgeter.py with huggingface_hub
Browse files- aco/verifier_budgeter.py +66 -330
aco/verifier_budgeter.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,338 +1,74 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
"""Verifier Budgeter -
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
Do not call verifiers everywhere.
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
Call verifiers when:
|
| 6 |
-
- task is high-risk
|
| 7 |
-
- confidence is low
|
| 8 |
-
- retrieval evidence is weak
|
| 9 |
-
- output is irreversible
|
| 10 |
-
- prior failures exist
|
| 11 |
-
- cheap model was used
|
| 12 |
-
- final answer is likely to be hallucination-prone
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
Compare:
|
| 15 |
-
A. no verifier
|
| 16 |
-
B. verifier on every output
|
| 17 |
-
C. heuristic verifier
|
| 18 |
-
D. learned verifier budgeter
|
| 19 |
-
E. risk-weighted verifier
|
| 20 |
-
"""
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
|
| 23 |
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
| 24 |
-
from enum import Enum
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
from .trace_schema import TaskType, Outcome
|
| 27 |
-
from .config import ACOConfig, VerifierConfig
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
class VerifierDecision(Enum):
|
| 31 |
-
CALL_VERIFIER = "call_verifier"
|
| 32 |
-
SKIP = "skip"
|
| 33 |
-
USE_LIGHT_VERIFIER = "use_light_verifier"
|
| 34 |
-
SELF_CHECK = "self_check"
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
@dataclass
|
| 38 |
-
class
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
reasoning: str
|
| 42 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost: float
|
| 43 |
-
estimated_value: float
|
| 44 |
confidence: float
|
| 45 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
class VerifierBudgeter:
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
if mode == "no_verifier":
|
| 80 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 81 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.SKIP,
|
| 82 |
-
verifier_model_id=None,
|
| 83 |
-
reasoning="No verifier mode",
|
| 84 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=0.0,
|
| 85 |
-
estimated_value=0.0,
|
| 86 |
-
confidence=1.0,
|
| 87 |
-
checks=[],
|
| 88 |
-
)
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
if mode == "always":
|
| 91 |
-
verifier = list(self.config.verifiers.values())[0] if self.config.verifiers else None
|
| 92 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 93 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.CALL_VERIFIER,
|
| 94 |
-
verifier_model_id=verifier.verifier_model_id if verifier else None,
|
| 95 |
-
reasoning="Verifier on every output",
|
| 96 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=verifier.cost_per_call if verifier else 0.0,
|
| 97 |
-
estimated_value=0.5,
|
| 98 |
-
confidence=0.5,
|
| 99 |
-
checks=["all"],
|
| 100 |
-
)
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
if mode == "heuristic":
|
| 103 |
-
return self._heuristic_decide(
|
| 104 |
-
task_type, model_tier_used, confidence, has_prior_failures,
|
| 105 |
-
is_irreversible, output_length_tokens, retrieval_evidence_count,
|
| 106 |
-
step_number, total_steps,
|
| 107 |
-
)
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
if mode in ("learned", "risk_weighted"):
|
| 110 |
-
return self._risk_weighted_decide(
|
| 111 |
-
task_type, model_tier_used, confidence, has_prior_failures,
|
| 112 |
-
is_irreversible, output_length_tokens, retrieval_evidence_count,
|
| 113 |
-
step_number, total_steps,
|
| 114 |
-
)
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
return self._risk_weighted_decide(
|
| 117 |
-
task_type, model_tier_used, confidence, has_prior_failures,
|
| 118 |
-
is_irreversible, output_length_tokens, retrieval_evidence_count,
|
| 119 |
-
step_number, total_steps,
|
| 120 |
-
)
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
def _heuristic_decide(
|
| 123 |
-
self,
|
| 124 |
-
task_type: TaskType,
|
| 125 |
-
model_tier_used: int,
|
| 126 |
-
confidence: float,
|
| 127 |
-
has_prior_failures: bool,
|
| 128 |
-
is_irreversible: bool,
|
| 129 |
-
output_length_tokens: int,
|
| 130 |
-
retrieval_evidence_count: int,
|
| 131 |
-
step_number: int,
|
| 132 |
-
total_steps: int,
|
| 133 |
-
) -> VerifierBudgetDecision:
|
| 134 |
-
"""Simple heuristic-based verifier selection."""
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
should_verify = False
|
| 137 |
-
checks = []
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
if task_type in self.HIGH_RISK_TASKS:
|
| 140 |
-
should_verify = True
|
| 141 |
-
checks.append("legal_compliance")
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
if confidence < self.LOW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD:
|
| 144 |
-
should_verify = True
|
| 145 |
-
checks.append("factual_accuracy")
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
if has_prior_failures:
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
|
| 168 |
-
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
|
| 172 |
-
)
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
-
# Pick verifier
|
| 175 |
-
verifier = self._select_verifier(checks)
|
| 176 |
-
|
| 177 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 178 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.CALL_VERIFIER,
|
| 179 |
-
verifier_model_id=verifier.verifier_model_id if verifier else None,
|
| 180 |
-
reasoning=f"Heuristic triggered: {', '.join(checks)}",
|
| 181 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=verifier.cost_per_call if verifier else 0.0,
|
| 182 |
-
estimated_value=0.3 + (1.0 - confidence) * 0.5,
|
| 183 |
-
confidence=confidence,
|
| 184 |
-
checks=checks,
|
| 185 |
-
)
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
def _risk_weighted_decide(
|
| 188 |
-
self,
|
| 189 |
-
task_type: TaskType,
|
| 190 |
-
model_tier_used: int,
|
| 191 |
-
confidence: float,
|
| 192 |
-
has_prior_failures: bool,
|
| 193 |
-
is_irreversible: bool,
|
| 194 |
-
output_length_tokens: int,
|
| 195 |
-
retrieval_evidence_count: int,
|
| 196 |
-
step_number: int,
|
| 197 |
-
total_steps: int,
|
| 198 |
-
) -> VerifierBudgetDecision:
|
| 199 |
-
"""Risk-weighted verifier selection with value estimation."""
|
| 200 |
-
|
| 201 |
-
# Compute risk score
|
| 202 |
-
risk = 0.0
|
| 203 |
-
checks = []
|
| 204 |
-
|
| 205 |
-
# Task type risk
|
| 206 |
-
if task_type in self.HIGH_RISK_TASKS:
|
| 207 |
-
risk += 0.4
|
| 208 |
-
checks.append("legal_compliance")
|
| 209 |
-
elif task_type in {TaskType.CODING, TaskType.RESEARCH}:
|
| 210 |
-
risk += 0.15
|
| 211 |
-
|
| 212 |
-
# Confidence risk
|
| 213 |
-
risk += max(0.0, (self.MEDIUM_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD - confidence) * 0.5)
|
| 214 |
-
if confidence < self.LOW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD:
|
| 215 |
-
checks.append("factual_accuracy")
|
| 216 |
-
|
| 217 |
-
# Model tier risk (cheap models are riskier)
|
| 218 |
-
risk += max(0.0, (3 - model_tier_used) * 0.05)
|
| 219 |
-
if model_tier_used <= 2 and task_type in (TaskType.CODING, TaskType.RESEARCH, TaskType.DOCUMENT_DRAFTING):
|
| 220 |
-
checks.append("output_quality")
|
| 221 |
-
|
| 222 |
-
# Prior failures
|
| 223 |
-
if has_prior_failures:
|
| 224 |
-
risk += 0.2
|
| 225 |
-
checks.append("failure_pattern")
|
| 226 |
-
|
| 227 |
-
# Irreversibility
|
| 228 |
-
if is_irreversible:
|
| 229 |
-
risk += 0.25
|
| 230 |
-
checks.append("safety")
|
| 231 |
-
|
| 232 |
-
# Evidence weakness
|
| 233 |
-
if retrieval_evidence_count == 0 and task_type in self.HALLUCINATION_PRONE_TASKS:
|
| 234 |
-
risk += 0.2
|
| 235 |
-
checks.append("hallucination")
|
| 236 |
-
|
| 237 |
-
# Output size (longer outputs are more error-prone)
|
| 238 |
-
if output_length_tokens > 2048:
|
| 239 |
-
risk += min(0.1, (output_length_tokens - 2048) / 50000)
|
| 240 |
-
|
| 241 |
-
# Step position (first and last steps are more critical)
|
| 242 |
-
if step_number == 1:
|
| 243 |
-
risk += 0.05
|
| 244 |
-
if step_number == total_steps and total_steps > 1:
|
| 245 |
-
risk += 0.1
|
| 246 |
-
checks.append("final_output")
|
| 247 |
-
|
| 248 |
-
risk = min(risk, 1.0)
|
| 249 |
-
|
| 250 |
-
# Cost-benefit analysis
|
| 251 |
-
verifier = self._select_verifier(checks)
|
| 252 |
-
verifier_cost = verifier.cost_per_call if verifier else 0.01
|
| 253 |
-
|
| 254 |
-
# Expected value of verification
|
| 255 |
-
# If risk is high, catching an error is very valuable
|
| 256 |
-
error_cost = self._estimate_error_cost(task_type, is_irreversible)
|
| 257 |
-
p_error = risk
|
| 258 |
-
p_catch = 0.7 # verifier catches error with 70% probability
|
| 259 |
-
expected_value = p_error * p_catch * error_cost - verifier_cost
|
| 260 |
-
|
| 261 |
-
if expected_value > 0 or risk > 0.6:
|
| 262 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 263 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.CALL_VERIFIER,
|
| 264 |
-
verifier_model_id=verifier.verifier_model_id if verifier else None,
|
| 265 |
-
reasoning=f"Risk={risk:.2f}, expected_value={expected_value:.4f}, checks={checks}",
|
| 266 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=verifier_cost,
|
| 267 |
-
estimated_value=expected_value,
|
| 268 |
-
confidence=confidence,
|
| 269 |
-
checks=list(set(checks)),
|
| 270 |
-
)
|
| 271 |
-
|
| 272 |
-
# For medium risk, use a lighter self-check
|
| 273 |
-
if risk > 0.3:
|
| 274 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 275 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.SELF_CHECK,
|
| 276 |
-
verifier_model_id=None,
|
| 277 |
-
reasoning=f"Medium risk ({risk:.2f}) — use lightweight self-check instead of full verifier",
|
| 278 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=0.0,
|
| 279 |
-
estimated_value=p_error * 0.3 * error_cost,
|
| 280 |
-
confidence=confidence,
|
| 281 |
-
checks=["self_consistency"],
|
| 282 |
-
)
|
| 283 |
-
|
| 284 |
-
return VerifierBudgetDecision(
|
| 285 |
-
decision=VerifierDecision.SKIP,
|
| 286 |
-
verifier_model_id=None,
|
| 287 |
-
reasoning=f"Low risk ({risk:.2f}), expected_value={expected_value:.4f} — skip verification",
|
| 288 |
-
estimated_verifier_cost=0.0,
|
| 289 |
-
estimated_value=0.0,
|
| 290 |
-
confidence=confidence,
|
| 291 |
-
checks=[],
|
| 292 |
-
)
|
| 293 |
-
|
| 294 |
-
def _select_verifier(self, checks: List[str]) -> Optional[VerifierConfig]:
|
| 295 |
-
"""Select appropriate verifier based on checks needed."""
|
| 296 |
-
if not self.config.verifiers:
|
| 297 |
-
return None
|
| 298 |
-
|
| 299 |
-
# For now, return the first verifier
|
| 300 |
-
# In production, map check types to specialist verifiers
|
| 301 |
-
return list(self.config.verifiers.values())[0]
|
| 302 |
-
|
| 303 |
-
def _estimate_error_cost(self, task_type: TaskType, is_irreversible: bool) -> float:
|
| 304 |
-
"""Estimate the cost of an undetected error."""
|
| 305 |
-
base = 1.0
|
| 306 |
-
if task_type == TaskType.LEGAL_REGULATED:
|
| 307 |
-
base = 10.0
|
| 308 |
-
elif task_type == TaskType.CODING:
|
| 309 |
-
base = 3.0
|
| 310 |
-
elif task_type == TaskType.RESEARCH:
|
| 311 |
-
base = 2.0
|
| 312 |
-
if is_irreversible:
|
| 313 |
-
base *= 2.0
|
| 314 |
-
return base
|
| 315 |
-
|
| 316 |
-
def record_verifier_outcome(
|
| 317 |
-
self,
|
| 318 |
-
verifier_model_id: str,
|
| 319 |
-
target_step: str,
|
| 320 |
-
passed: bool,
|
| 321 |
-
cost: float,
|
| 322 |
-
was_actually_correct: bool,
|
| 323 |
-
) -> None:
|
| 324 |
-
"""Record verifier performance for calibration."""
|
| 325 |
-
stats = self.verifier_stats.setdefault(verifier_model_id, {
|
| 326 |
-
"calls": 0, "passed": 0, "true_positives": 0, "false_positives": 0,
|
| 327 |
-
"false_negatives": 0, "total_cost": 0.0,
|
| 328 |
-
})
|
| 329 |
-
stats["calls"] += 1
|
| 330 |
-
if passed:
|
| 331 |
-
stats["passed"] += 1
|
| 332 |
-
if passed and was_actually_correct:
|
| 333 |
-
stats["true_positives"] += 1
|
| 334 |
-
if passed and not was_actually_correct:
|
| 335 |
-
stats["false_positives"] += 1
|
| 336 |
-
if not passed and was_actually_correct:
|
| 337 |
-
stats["false_negatives"] += 1
|
| 338 |
-
stats["total_cost"] += cost
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""Verifier Budgeter: Selective verification for high-risk outputs only."""
|
| 2 |
+
from typing import Dict, Optional, Tuple
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
@dataclass
|
| 6 |
+
class VerifierDecision:
|
| 7 |
+
should_verify: bool
|
| 8 |
+
verifier_type: str # "full", "spot_check", "skip"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
confidence: float
|
| 10 |
+
reasoning: str
|
| 11 |
+
estimated_cost: float
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
RISK_VERIFIER_MAP = {
|
| 14 |
+
"critical": {"min_confidence": 0.95, "verifier_type": "full"},
|
| 15 |
+
"high": {"min_confidence": 0.85, "verifier_type": "full"},
|
| 16 |
+
"medium": {"min_confidence": 0.70, "verifier_type": "spot_check"},
|
| 17 |
+
"low": {"min_confidence": 0.50, "verifier_type": "spot_check"},
|
| 18 |
+
}
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
class VerifierBudgeter:
|
| 21 |
+
def __init__(self, verifier_cost: float = 0.02, max_verifications_per_run: int = 3):
|
| 22 |
+
self.verifier_cost = verifier_cost
|
| 23 |
+
self.max_per_run = max_verifications_per_run
|
| 24 |
+
self.verifications_this_run = 0
|
| 25 |
+
self.stats = {"verified":0,"skipped":0,"spot_checked":0,"false_passes":0,"false_rejects":0}
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
def should_verify(self, task_type: str, risk: str, model_confidence: float,
|
| 28 |
+
is_irreversible: bool = False, has_prior_failures: bool = False,
|
| 29 |
+
model_tier: int = 4, step_num: int = 0,
|
| 30 |
+
total_steps: int = 1) -> VerifierDecision:
|
| 31 |
+
if self.verifications_this_run >= self.max_per_run:
|
| 32 |
+
self.stats["skipped"] += 1
|
| 33 |
+
return VerifierDecision(False, "skip", model_confidence,
|
| 34 |
+
"max verifications reached", 0.0)
|
| 35 |
+
# Check if this is the final answer
|
| 36 |
+
is_final = (step_num == total_steps or step_num == -1)
|
| 37 |
+
# Risk-based threshold
|
| 38 |
+
risk_config = RISK_VERIFIER_MAP.get(risk, RISK_VERIFIER_MAP["medium"])
|
| 39 |
+
min_conf = risk_config["min_confidence"]
|
| 40 |
+
default_type = risk_config["verifier_type"]
|
| 41 |
+
# Adjust for context
|
| 42 |
+
should = False
|
| 43 |
+
reasons = []
|
| 44 |
+
if model_confidence < min_conf:
|
| 45 |
+
should = True
|
| 46 |
+
reasons.append(f"low confidence ({model_confidence:.2f} < {min_conf})")
|
| 47 |
+
if is_irreversible and risk in ("high", "critical"):
|
| 48 |
+
should = True
|
| 49 |
+
reasons.append("irreversible + high risk")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
if has_prior_failures:
|
| 51 |
+
should = True
|
| 52 |
+
reasons.append("prior failures exist")
|
| 53 |
+
if model_tier <= 2 and risk in ("high", "critical"):
|
| 54 |
+
should = True
|
| 55 |
+
reasons.append("cheap model on high-risk task")
|
| 56 |
+
if is_final and risk in ("high", "critical"):
|
| 57 |
+
should = True
|
| 58 |
+
reasons.append("final answer on high-risk task")
|
| 59 |
+
if not should:
|
| 60 |
+
self.stats["skipped"] += 1
|
| 61 |
+
return VerifierDecision(False, "skip", model_confidence,
|
| 62 |
+
"no verification needed", 0.0)
|
| 63 |
+
self.verifications_this_run += 1
|
| 64 |
+
vtype = default_type
|
| 65 |
+
if model_confidence > min_conf and not is_irreversible:
|
| 66 |
+
vtype = "spot_check"
|
| 67 |
+
self.stats["spot_checked"] += 1
|
| 68 |
+
else:
|
| 69 |
+
self.stats["verified"] += 1
|
| 70 |
+
return VerifierDecision(True, vtype, model_confidence,
|
| 71 |
+
"; ".join(reasons), self.verifier_cost)
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
def reset_run(self):
|
| 74 |
+
self.verifications_this_run = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|