Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
tags:
|
| 3 |
+
- astronomy
|
| 4 |
+
- time-series
|
| 5 |
+
- light-curves
|
| 6 |
+
- variable-stars
|
| 7 |
+
- onnx
|
| 8 |
+
library_name: onnx
|
| 9 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 10 |
+
---
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
# AstroM3 (photo encoder)
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
## Paper
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
Rizhko, M. et al. (2024). *AstroM³: A self-supervised multimodal model for astronomy*. arXiv:2411.08842.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 19 |
+
@article{rizhko2024astrom3,
|
| 20 |
+
author = {Rizhko, Mariia and Bloom, Joshua S.},
|
| 21 |
+
title = {{AstroM³}: A self-supervised multimodal model for astronomy},
|
| 22 |
+
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08842},
|
| 23 |
+
year = {2024}
|
| 24 |
+
}
|
| 25 |
+
```
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Original code
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
<https://github.com/MeriDK/AstroM3> (git submodule at `models/astrom3/code/`)
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## License
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
- **Code** (this repository): MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
| 34 |
+
- **Model weights** (`AstroMLCore/AstroM3-CLIP-photo`): Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
## Model overview
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
AstroM3 is a self-supervised multimodal contrastive model for variable-star classification that jointly trains photometry (light-curve), spectra, and metadata encoders using a CLIP-style objective. This integration exports the **photo-only encoder** from the pretrained CLIP checkpoint (`AstroMLCore/AstroM3-CLIP-photo`) as an ONNX embedding model.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
The photo encoder is an [Informer](https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17325/17132) transformer (ProbSparse attention, 8 layers, d_model=128) trained on ZTF variable-star light curves from the MACC dataset. For ONNX export, the ProbSparse attention layers are replaced with standard scaled dot-product attention, which is equivalent in expectation and fully ONNX-exportable.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
## Inputs
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
| Tensor | Shape | Description |
|
| 45 |
+
|--------|-------|-------------|
|
| 46 |
+
| `x_enc` | `[batch, 200, 9]` | Padded photometry features (9 channels per timestep — see preprocessing) |
|
| 47 |
+
| `mask` | `[batch, 200]` | `1` for valid timesteps, `0` for padding |
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Outputs (ONNX)
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Single file `astrom3.onnx` with two named outputs:
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
| Output | Shape | Aggregation |
|
| 54 |
+
|--------|-------|-------------|
|
| 55 |
+
| `mean` | `[batch, 128]` | Masked mean pool of encoder outputs |
|
| 56 |
+
| `sequence` | `[batch, 200, 128]` | Full per-timestep encoder outputs (unmasked) |
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## Preprocessing steps
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
The 9 input channels per timestep are built by `preprocess_lc()` in the
|
| 61 |
+
upstream dataset (`AstroMLCore/AstroM3Dataset`):
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
| Index | Feature | How obtained |
|
| 64 |
+
|-------|---------|--------------|
|
| 65 |
+
| 0 | `time` (HJD scaled to [0, 1]) | per-observation |
|
| 66 |
+
| 1 | `flux` = `(flux − mean) / MAD` | per-observation |
|
| 67 |
+
| 2 | `flux_err` = `flux_err / MAD` | per-observation |
|
| 68 |
+
| 3 | `amplitude` | **ASAS-SN catalog scalar, replicated to every timestep** |
|
| 69 |
+
| 4 | `period` | **ASAS-SN catalog scalar, replicated** |
|
| 70 |
+
| 5 | `lksl_statistic` (Lafler-Kinman string length) | **ASAS-SN catalog scalar, replicated** |
|
| 71 |
+
| 6 | `rfr_score` (Random Forest Regressor R² for phase-folded LC) | **ASAS-SN catalog scalar, replicated** |
|
| 72 |
+
| 7 | `log10(MAD_flux)` | global scalar computed from LC, replicated |
|
| 73 |
+
| 8 | `delta_t` = `(max_HJD − min_HJD) / 365` | global scalar computed from LC, replicated |
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
Features 3–6 come directly from the ASAS-SN v-band variable-star catalog
|
| 76 |
+
(Jayasinghe et al. 2019) and are **not recomputed** from the light curve by
|
| 77 |
+
this codebase. Users applying this model to non-ASAS-SN data must provide
|
| 78 |
+
equivalent values (e.g. run a Lomb-Scargle period finder and compute
|
| 79 |
+
peak-to-peak amplitude themselves).
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
Preprocessing recipe for a single light curve:
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
1. Deduplicate and sort observations by HJD.
|
| 84 |
+
2. Compute `mean` and `MAD` of the flux column; normalize flux and flux_err.
|
| 85 |
+
3. Scale HJD to [0, 1] over the span of the light curve.
|
| 86 |
+
4. Compute `log10(MAD_flux)` and `delta_t = (max_HJD − min_HJD) / 365`.
|
| 87 |
+
5. Obtain `amplitude`, `period`, `lksl_statistic`, `rfr_score` from the
|
| 88 |
+
ASAS-SN catalog (or compute equivalents).
|
| 89 |
+
6. Tile the 6 global scalars across all timesteps; concatenate with columns
|
| 90 |
+
0–2 to produce an `(N, 9)` array.
|
| 91 |
+
7. Pad or center-crop to 200 timesteps; set `mask = 0` for padded positions.
|
| 92 |
+
8. Use `float32` for all tensors.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
## Weights
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
Source: <https://huggingface.co/AstroMLCore/AstroM3-CLIP-photo>
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
The `model.safetensors` file is a standalone Informer checkpoint (classification head present but unused; loaded with `strict=False`).
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
Dataset: ASAS-SN v-band variable-star light curves (`AstroMLCore/AstroM3Processed`).
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
## Applying the model without ASAS-SN catalog features
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
Features 3–6 require the ASAS-SN catalog. For users applying the model to
|
| 105 |
+
other surveys, we measured the sensitivity of the mean embedding to each
|
| 106 |
+
feature being replaced. `rfr_score` was studied in detail.
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
### rfr_score substitution
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
`rfr_score` is the R² of a Random Forest Regressor fit to the phase-folded
|
| 111 |
+
light curve; it quantifies period quality
|
| 112 |
+
(Jayasinghe et al. 2019, MNRAS 486 1907, §5; arXiv:1809.07329).
|
| 113 |
+
In the ASAS-SN test set it ranges from −3.5 to 1.18 (median ≈ 0.38).
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
Setting all timesteps to the constant **0.392** (the empirical optimum,
|
| 116 |
+
equal to the dataset median) minimises mean cosine distance from the
|
| 117 |
+
true-feature embeddings:
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
| Metric | Value |
|
| 120 |
+
|--------|-------|
|
| 121 |
+
| Overall mean cosine distance | 0.049 ± 0.091 |
|
| 122 |
+
| Macro-average per class | 0.049 ± 0.058 |
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
Per-class breakdown (5 samples per class from the ASAS-SN test split):
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
| Class | Mean dist | Std | True rfr mean |
|
| 127 |
+
|-------|-----------|-----|---------------|
|
| 128 |
+
| EW | 0.005 | 0.005 | −0.07 |
|
| 129 |
+
| SR | 0.004 | 0.003 | +0.50 |
|
| 130 |
+
| EA | 0.060 | 0.032 | +0.95 |
|
| 131 |
+
| RRAB | 0.020 | 0.011 | +0.83 |
|
| 132 |
+
| EB | 0.016 | 0.011 | +0.90 |
|
| 133 |
+
| ROT | 0.002 | 0.002 | +0.85 |
|
| 134 |
+
| RRC | 0.147 | 0.115 | −0.79 |
|
| 135 |
+
| HADS | 0.016 | 0.011 | +0.59 |
|
| 136 |
+
| M | 0.050 | 0.020 | +0.18 |
|
| 137 |
+
| DSCT | 0.170 | 0.182 | −0.86 |
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
Classes whose true rfr mean is far from 0.39 (RRC, DSCT) are most affected.
|
| 140 |
+
Using an out-of-range value (e.g. ±100) causes cosine distances ~0.93–0.97,
|
| 141 |
+
so staying within the training distribution is important.
|