joyboseroy commited on
Commit
3fc0665
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 169e801

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +62 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,64 @@
1
  ---
2
- license: mit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ license: apache-2.0
3
+ base_model: unsloth/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-bnb-4bit
4
+ tags:
5
+ - legal-ai
6
+ - lora
7
+ - peft
8
+ - qlora
9
+ - indian-law
10
+ - legal-simplification
11
+ - accessibility
12
+ - irac
13
+ - transformers
14
+ - unsloth
15
+ language:
16
+ - en
17
+ pipeline_tag: text-generation
18
+ datasets:
19
+ - joyboseroy/inIRAC
20
+ library_name: transformers
21
  ---
22
+
23
+ # NyayaSaar-LoRA
24
+
25
+ NyayaSaar-LoRA is a lightweight LoRA adapter fine-tuned to simplify structured Indian legal reasoning into plain English.
26
+
27
+ The project focuses on improving accessibility to legal reasoning for non-lawyers interacting with the Indian legal system.
28
+
29
+ This model was trained using parameter-efficient fine-tuning (LoRA/QLoRA) on structured IRAC-style legal reasoning examples derived from the inIRAC dataset.
30
+
31
+ ---
32
+
33
+ # Motivation
34
+
35
+ Indian legal documents are often difficult for ordinary citizens to understand because of:
36
+
37
+ - archaic terminology,
38
+ - procedural complexity,
39
+ - dense sentence structures,
40
+ - and formal legal phrasing.
41
+
42
+ NyayaSaar-LoRA explores whether small language models can learn to preserve legal meaning while simplifying language and improving readability.
43
+
44
+ The project prioritizes:
45
+
46
+ - accessibility,
47
+ - explainability,
48
+ - low-resource adaptation,
49
+ - and efficient fine-tuning.
50
+
51
+ ---
52
+
53
+ # Example
54
+
55
+ ## Input
56
+
57
+ ```text
58
+ Issue: Whether the detention order violates Article 22.
59
+
60
+ Rule: Preventive detention laws require procedural safeguards.
61
+
62
+ Application: The petitioner argued safeguards were not followed.
63
+
64
+ Conclusion: The detention order is quashed.