Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ Dataset** product. It contains roughly **~10% of the full dataset** at
|
|
| 28 |
identical schema, MITRE ATT&CK tactic coverage, and statistical fingerprint,
|
| 29 |
so you can evaluate fit before licensing the full product.
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
| File | Rows (sample) | Rows (full) | Description |
|
| 32 |
|----------------------------|---------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------|
|
| 33 |
| `soc_topology.csv` | ~25 | ~2,400 | SOC / analyst registry |
|
|
@@ -61,6 +71,45 @@ lifecycles across enterprise detection environments, with:
|
|
| 61 |
- **Rule drift modeling** — periodic rule-noise amplification simulating
|
| 62 |
detection-engineering signal decay
|
| 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
## Calibrated Benchmark Targets
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
The full product is calibrated to 12 benchmark validation tests drawn from
|
|
@@ -136,8 +185,10 @@ and SOC registry schemas respectively.
|
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
## Suggested Use Cases
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
-
- Training **alert triage** models — predict
|
| 140 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 141 |
- **SOAR playbook recommendation** — predict which alerts benefit from
|
| 142 |
automation
|
| 143 |
- **Alert prioritization** — calibrate triage scores against ground-truth
|
|
@@ -146,7 +197,7 @@ and SOC registry schemas respectively.
|
|
| 146 |
workload
|
| 147 |
- **Kill-chain detection** — group related alerts into multi-stage
|
| 148 |
incidents
|
| 149 |
-
- **SLA breach prediction** — early-warning systems
|
| 150 |
- **Alert storm detection** — distinguish coordinated bursts from baseline
|
| 151 |
volume
|
| 152 |
- **False positive reduction** modeling — reduce 45% FP rate
|
|
@@ -166,23 +217,25 @@ topology = pd.read_csv("soc_topology.csv")
|
|
| 166 |
enriched = alerts.merge(topology, on=["soc_id", "analyst_id"], how="left",
|
| 167 |
suffixes=("", "_analyst"))
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
#
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
y_tp = alerts["resolution_outcome"].isin([
|
| 171 |
-
"true_positive_remediated",
|
| 172 |
-
"true_positive_escalated",
|
| 173 |
-
"incident_declared",
|
| 174 |
]).astype(int)
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
-
# Multi-class ATT&CK tactic classification target
|
| 177 |
y_tactic = alerts["mitre_tactic"]
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
-
# Binary SLA breach prediction target
|
| 180 |
y_sla = alerts["sla_breached_flag"]
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
-
# Per-incident severity classification
|
| 183 |
-
y_severity = incidents["incident_severity"]
|
| 184 |
```
|
| 185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 186 |
## License
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
This **sample** is released under **CC-BY-NC-4.0** (free for non-commercial
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
identical schema, MITRE ATT&CK tactic coverage, and statistical fingerprint,
|
| 29 |
so you can evaluate fit before licensing the full product.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
> 🤖 **Trained baseline available:**
|
| 32 |
+
> [**xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier**](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier)
|
| 33 |
+
> — XGBoost + PyTorch MLP for **5-class SOC alert triage outcome
|
| 34 |
+
> classification** (the README's first headline use case), stratified
|
| 35 |
+
> split, multi-seed evaluation (ROC-AUC 0.955 ± 0.003). **Includes a
|
| 36 |
+
> structural-leakage diagnostic** documenting three oracle columns
|
| 37 |
+
> dropped from the feature set, and a separate unlearnable-target
|
| 38 |
+
> finding for MITRE ATT&CK tactic classification. Buyers planning
|
| 39 |
+
> SOC ML work should read the diagnostic first.
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
| File | Rows (sample) | Rows (full) | Description |
|
| 42 |
|----------------------------|---------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------|
|
| 43 |
| `soc_topology.csv` | ~25 | ~2,400 | SOC / analyst registry |
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
- **Rule drift modeling** — periodic rule-noise amplification simulating
|
| 72 |
detection-engineering signal decay
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
## Trained Baseline Available
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
A working baseline classifier trained on this sample is published at
|
| 77 |
+
**[xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier)**.
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
| Component | Detail |
|
| 80 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 81 |
+
| Primary task | **5-class `resolution_outcome` classification** (SOC alert triage — the README's first headline use case) |
|
| 82 |
+
| Diagnostic | Structural-leakage audit (3 oracle columns dropped) + unlearnable-target finding for `mitre_tactic` |
|
| 83 |
+
| Models | XGBoost (`model_xgb.json`) + PyTorch MLP (`model_mlp.safetensors`) |
|
| 84 |
+
| Features | 53 (after one-hot encoding); pipeline included as `feature_engineering.py` |
|
| 85 |
+
| Split | **Stratified random** — no natural row-level group key (25 analysts, 5 SOCs, only 9% of alerts link to an incident) |
|
| 86 |
+
| Validation | Single seed + multi-seed aggregate across 10 seeds |
|
| 87 |
+
| Demo | `inference_example.ipynb` — end-to-end copy-paste |
|
| 88 |
+
| Headline metrics | XGBoost: accuracy 0.777 ± 0.007, macro ROC-AUC 0.955 ± 0.003 (multi-seed); MLP slightly outperforms |
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
**Important findings for buyers planning SOC ML work:**
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
1. **Three structural oracles in the data** (`alert_lifecycle_phase`,
|
| 93 |
+
`automation_resolved`, `escalation_flag`) deterministically encode
|
| 94 |
+
the `resolution_outcome` label. With these columns present, a
|
| 95 |
+
plain XGBoost achieves 100% accuracy. The baseline excludes them
|
| 96 |
+
to demonstrate honest learning — and the documented honest result
|
| 97 |
+
(acc 0.78, AUC 0.96) is genuinely useful.
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
2. **MITRE ATT&CK tactic classification is NOT learnable on this
|
| 100 |
+
sample.** The README lists tactic classification as a top use case,
|
| 101 |
+
but feature distributions are nearly identical across all 12
|
| 102 |
+
tactics. A trained model performs *below* majority baseline
|
| 103 |
+
(acc 0.08 vs 0.14). The baseline model card documents this
|
| 104 |
+
explicitly with a recommendation to the dataset author.
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
3. **SLA breach prediction is also not learnable** (acc 0.68 vs
|
| 107 |
+
majority 0.82). Documented as out-of-scope.
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
See the model card and `leakage_diagnostic.json` for the full audit
|
| 110 |
+
and our recommendations to make these tasks viable in the next
|
| 111 |
+
dataset version.
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
## Calibrated Benchmark Targets
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
The full product is calibrated to 12 benchmark validation tests drawn from
|
|
|
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
## Suggested Use Cases
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
+
- Training **alert triage** models — predict TP vs FP, or full 5-class
|
| 189 |
+
resolution outcome (the baseline ships this) —
|
| 190 |
+
[worked example available](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier)
|
| 191 |
+
- **MITRE ATT&CK tactic classification** from alert features (see baseline diagnostic — not learnable on this sample)
|
| 192 |
- **SOAR playbook recommendation** — predict which alerts benefit from
|
| 193 |
automation
|
| 194 |
- **Alert prioritization** — calibrate triage scores against ground-truth
|
|
|
|
| 197 |
workload
|
| 198 |
- **Kill-chain detection** — group related alerts into multi-stage
|
| 199 |
incidents
|
| 200 |
+
- **SLA breach prediction** — early-warning systems (see baseline diagnostic — not learnable on this sample)
|
| 201 |
- **Alert storm detection** — distinguish coordinated bursts from baseline
|
| 202 |
volume
|
| 203 |
- **False positive reduction** modeling — reduce 45% FP rate
|
|
|
|
| 217 |
enriched = alerts.merge(topology, on=["soc_id", "analyst_id"], how="left",
|
| 218 |
suffixes=("", "_analyst"))
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
+
# 5-class triage outcome target (the README's first headline use case)
|
| 221 |
+
y_outcome = alerts["resolution_outcome"]
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
# Binary true-positive collapse (for binary triage)
|
| 224 |
y_tp = alerts["resolution_outcome"].isin([
|
| 225 |
+
"true_positive_remediated", "true_positive_escalated",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 226 |
]).astype(int)
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
+
# Multi-class ATT&CK tactic classification target — see leakage diagnostic
|
| 229 |
y_tactic = alerts["mitre_tactic"]
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
+
# Binary SLA breach prediction target — see leakage diagnostic
|
| 232 |
y_sla = alerts["sla_breached_flag"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 233 |
```
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 |
+
For a worked end-to-end example with 5-class triage classification,
|
| 236 |
+
stratified splitting, and feature engineering, see the inference notebook
|
| 237 |
+
in the [baseline classifier repo](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems/cyb008-baseline-classifier/blob/main/inference_example.ipynb).
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
## License
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
This **sample** is released under **CC-BY-NC-4.0** (free for non-commercial
|