bureaucracybusters
Bureaucracybuster's Blog
Top 12 Busting Rules
About Steffen White
Posts Tagged 'SS'
ABC NEWS, ADMIRAL IVAN ISAKOV, ADOLF HITLER, ALBERT SPEER, ALTERNET, ANDREW MCCABE, AP, BOB WOODWARD, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CHEKA, CIA, CNN, COUNTER-SURVEILLANCE, CROOKS AND LIARS, DAILY KOZ, DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DONALD TRUMP, FBI, FSB, GENRIKH YAGODA, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HERMANN GOERING, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JAMES COMEY, JEFF SESSIONS, JOSEPH STALIN, KGB, KRISJEN NIELSEN, LAVRENTY BERIA, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI, NIKOLAI YEZHOV, NKVD, NPR, PBS NEWSHOUR, POLITICO, RACHEL BRAND, RANDOLPF "TEX" ALLES, RAW STORY, REPUBLICAN PARTY, REUTERS, SALLY YATES, SALON, SEAN SPICER, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SOVIET UNION, SS, STORMY DANIELS, SURVEILLANCE, THE APPRENTICE, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE PRINCE, THE WASHINGTON POST, TIME, TWITTER, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY
PRESIDENTS RULE BY CONSENT, DICTATORS RULE BY FEAR: PART TWO (END)
In Bureaucracy, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Military, Politics, Social commentary on December 27, 2022 at 12:10 am
In January, 2018, the White House banned the use of personal cell phones in the West Wing. The official reason: National security.
The real reason: To prevent staffers from leaking to reporters.
More ominously, well-suited men roamed the halls of the West Wing, carrying devices that pick up signals from phones that aren't government-issued.
"Did someone forget to put their phone away?" one of the men would ask if such a device was detected. If no one said they had a phone, the detection team started searching the room.
Phone detector
The devices can tell which type of phone is in the room.
This is the sort of behavior Americans have traditionally—and correctly—associated with dictatorships
In his memo outlining the policy, then-Chief of Staff John Kelly warned that anyone who violated the phone ban could be punished, including "being indefinitely prohibited from entering the White House complex."
Yet even these draconian methods did not end White House leaks.
White House officials still spoke with reporters throughout the day and often aired their grievances, whether about annoying colleagues or competing policy priorities.
Aides with private offices sometimes called reporters on their desk phones. Others got their cell phones and called or texted reporters during lunch breaks.
According to an anonymous White House source: "The cellphone ban is for when people are inside the West Wing, so it really doesn't do all that much to prevent leaks. If they banned all personal cellphones from the entire [White House] grounds, all that would do is make reporters stay up later because they couldn't talk to their sources until after 6:30 pm."
Other sources believed that leaks wouldn't end unless Trump started firing staffers. But there was always the risk of firing the wrong people. Thus, to protect themselves, those who leaked might well accuse tight-lipped co-workers.
Within the Soviet Union (especially during the reign of Joseph Stalin) fear of secret police surveillance was widespread—and absolutely justified.
Among the methods used to keep conversations secret:
Turning on the TV or radio to full volume.
Turning on a water faucet at full blast.
Turning the dial of a rotary phone to the end—and sticking a pencil in one of the small holes for numbers.
Standing six to nine feet away from the hung-up receiver.
Going for "a walk in the woods."
Saying nothing sensitive on the phone.
The secret police (known as the Cheka, the NKVD, the MGB, the KGB, and now the FSB) operated on seven working principles:
Your enemy is hiding.
Start from the usual suspects.
Study the young.
Stop the laughing.
Rebellion spreads like wildfire.
Stamp out every spark.
Order is created by appearance.
Trump has always ruled through bribery and fear. He's bought off (or tried to) those who might cause him trouble—like porn actress Stormy Daniels. And he's threatened or filed lawsuits against those he couldn't or didn't want to bribe—such as contractors who have worked on various Trump properties.
But Trump couldn't buy the loyalty of employees working in an atmosphere of hostility—which breeds resentment and fear. And some of them took revenge by sharing with reporters the latest crimes and follies of the Trump administration.
The more Trump waged war on the "cowards and traitors" who worked most closely with him, the more some of them found opportunities to strike back. This inflamed Trump even more—and led him to seek even more repressive methods against his own staffers.
This proved a no-win situation for Trump.
The results were twofold:
Constant turnovers of staffers—with their replacements having to undergo lengthy background checks before coming on; and
Continued leaking of embarrassing secrets by resentful employees who stayed.
As host of NBC's "The Apprentice," Trump became infamous for booting off contestants with the phrase: "You're fired." In fact, he so delighted in using this that, in 2004, he tried to gain trademark ownership of it.
But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rejected his application. American copyright law explicitly prohibits copyright protections for short phrases or sayings.
Upon taking office as President, Trump bullied and insulted even White House officials and his own handpicked Cabinet officers. This resulted in an avalanche of firings and resignations.
The first two years of Trump's White House saw more firings, resignations, and reassignments of top staffers than any other first-term administration in modern history. His Cabinet turnover exceeded that of any other administration in the last 100 years.
In 1934, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, seeing imaginary enemies everywhere, ordered a series of purges that lasted right up to the German invasion in 1941.
No one was safe from execution—not even the men who slaughtered as many as 20 to 60 million.
Fittingly, for all the fear he inspired, Stalin was plagued by paranoia. He lived in constant fear of assassination. Although surrounded by bodyguards, he distrusted even them.
Thus Stalin, who had turned the Soviet Union into a vast prison, became its leading prisoner.
Similarly, Donald Trump daily proved the accuracy of the age-old warning: "You can build a throne of bayonets, but you can't sit on it."
ABC NEWS, ADMIRAL IVAN ISAKOV, ADOLF HITLER, ALBERT SPEER, ALTERNET, ANDREW MCCABE, AP, BOB WOODWARD, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CHEKA, CIA, CNN, COUNTER-SURVEILLANCE, CROOKS AND LIARS, DAILY KOZ, DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DONALD TRUMP, FBI, FSB, GENRIKH YAGODA, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HERMANN GOERING, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JAMES COMEY, JEFF SESSIONS, JOSEPH STALIN, KGB, KRISJEN NIELSEN, LAVRENTY BERIA, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI, NIKOLAI YEZHOV, NKVD, NPR, PBS NEWSHOUR, POLITICO, RACHEL BRAND, RANDOLPF "TEX" ALLES, RAW STORY, REPUBLICAN PARTY, REUTERS, SALLY YATES, SALON, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SOVIET UNION, SS, STORMY DANIELS, SURVEILLANCE, THE APPRENTICE, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE PRINCE, THE WASHINGTON POST, TIME, TWITTER, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY
PRESIDENTS RULE BY CONSENT, DICTATORS RULE BY FEAR: PART ONE (OF TWO)
Donald Trump has often been compared to Adolf Hitler. But his reign bears far more resemblance to that of Joseph Stalin.
Germany's Fuhrer, for all his brutality, maintained a relatively stable government by keeping the same men in office—from the day he took power on January 30, 1933, to the day he blew out his brains on April 30, 1945.
Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1990-048-29A / CC-BY-SA 3.0 [CC BY-SA 3.0 de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en)%5D
Heinrich Himmler, a former chicken farmer, remained head of the dreaded, black-uniformed Schutzstaffel, or Protection Squads, known as the SS, from 1929 until his suicide in 1945.
In April, 1934, Himmler was appointed assistant chief of the Gestapo (Secret State Police) in Prussia, and from that position he extended his control over the police forces of the whole Reich.
Hermann Goering, an ace fighter pilot in World War 1, served as Reich commissioner for aviation and head of the newly developed Luftwaffe, the German air force, from 1935 to 1945.
And Albert Speer, Hitler's favorite architect, held that position from 1933 until 1942, when Hitler appointed him Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production. He held that position until the Third Reich collapsed in April, 1945.
Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin, by contrast, purged his ministers constantly. For example: From 1934 to 1953, Stalin had no fewer than three chiefs of his secret police, then named the NKVD:
Genrikh Yagoda – (July 10, 1934 – September 26, 1936)
Nikolai Yezhov (September 26, 1936 – November 25, 1938) and
Lavrenty Beria (November, 1938 – March, 1953).
Stalin purged Yagoda and Yezhov, with both men executed after their arrest.
He reportedly wanted to purge Beria, too, but the latter may have acted first. There has been speculation that Beria slipped warfarin, a blood-thinner often used to kill rats, into Stalin's drink, causing him to die of a cerebral hemorrhage.
Stalin's record for slaughter far eclipses that of Hitler.
For almost 30 years, through purges and starvation caused by enforced collections of farmers' crops, Stalin slaughtered 20 to 60 million people.
The 1930s were a frightening and dangerous time to be alive in the Soviet Union. In 1934, Stalin, seeing imaginary enemies everywhere, ordered a series of purges that lasted right up to the German invasion in 1941.
An example of Stalin's paranoia occurred one day while the dictator walked through the Kremlin corridors with Admiral Ivan Isakov. Officers of the NKVD (the predecessor to the KGB) stood guard at every corner.
"Every time I walk down the corridors," said Stalin, "I think: Which one of them is it? If it's this one, he will shoot me in the back. But if I turn the corner, the next one can shoot me in the face."
Another Russian-installed tyrant who has sought to rule by fear: President Donald J. Trump.
In fact, he admitted as much to journalist Bob Woodward during the 2016 Presidential race: "Real power is—I don't even want to use the word—fear."
As a Presidential candidate, Trump repeatedly used Twitter to attack hundreds of real and imagined enemies in politics, journalism, TV and films.
As President, he continued to insult virtually everyone, verbally and on Twitter. His targets included Democrats, Republicans, the media, foreign leaders and even members of his Cabinet.
In Russian, the word for "purge" is "chistka," for "cleansing." Among the victims of Trump's recurring chistkas:
Sally Yates – Assistant United States Attorney General
James Comey – FBI Director
Andrew McCabe – FBI Deputy Director
Jeff Sessions – United States Attorney General
Rachel Brand – Associate United States Attorney General
Randolph "Tex" Alles – Director of the United States Secret Service
Krisjen Nielsen – Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
In his infamous political treatise, The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, the Florentine statesman, asked: "Is it is better to be loved or feared?"
And he answered it thus:
"The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved.
"For it may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger and covetous of gain; as long as you benefit them, they are entirely yours….
"And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined….
"And men have less scruple in offending one who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared; for love is held by a chain of obligations which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purpose; but fear is maintained by a dread of punishment which never fails."
But Machiavelli warned about relying primarily on fear: "Still, a prince should make himself feared in such a way that if he does not gain love, he at any rate avoids hatred, for fear and the absence of hatred may well go together."
Donald Trump has violated that counsel throughout his life. He not only makes enemies, he revels in doing so—and in the fury he has aroused.
Filled with a poisonous hatred that encompasses almost everyone, Trump, as Presidential candidate and President, repeatedly played to the hatreds of his Right-wing base.
As first-mate Starbuck said of Captain Ahab in Herman Melville's classic novel, Moby Dick: "He is a champion of darkness."
ABC NEWS, ALTERNET, AP, BILL CLINTON, BUZZFEED, CALIFORNIA ENERGY CRISIS, CBS NEWS, CNN, COVID-19, CROOKS AND LIARS, DE-REGULATION, DEMOCRATS, DONALD TRUMP, ENRON, FACEBOOK, FBI, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, GRAY DAVIS, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HOLOCAUST, MAFIA, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI, NPR, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC, PBS NEWSHOUR, PETE WILSON, POLITICO, RAW STORY, REPUBLICANS, REUTERS, RICO ACT, SALON, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SS, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE SS, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE WASHINGTON POST, TIME, TWITTER, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, USA TODAY
DE-REGULATION: LET CRIMINALS BE CRIMINALS
In Bureaucracy, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Politics, Social commentary on November 10, 2022 at 12:12 am
This December 2 will mark the 21st anniversary of the collapse of Enron Corporation.
Based in Houston, Texas, Enron had employed 22,000 staffers and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications and paper companies.
In 2000, it claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion. Fortune had named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years.
But then the truth emerged in 2001: Enron's reported profitability was based not on brilliance and innovation but on systematic and creative accounting fraud.
And, on December 2, 2001, Enron filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
Enron's $63.4 billion in assets made it the largest corporate bankruptcy in U.S. history—until WorldCom's bankruptcy in 2002.
The California electricity crisis (2000-2001) was caused by market manipulations and illegal shutdowns of pipelines by Texas energy companies.
The state suffered from multiple large-scale blackouts. Pacific Gas & Electric, one of the state's largest energy companies, collapsed, and the economic fall-out greatly harmed Governor Gray Davis' standing.
The crisis was made possible by Governor Pete Wilson, who had forced the passage of partial de-regulation legislation in 1996.
Enron seized its opportunity to inflate prices and manipulate energy output in California's spot markets. The crisis cost the state $40 to $45 billion.
The true scandal of Enron was not that it was eventually destroyed by its own greed.
The true scandal was that its leaders were never Federally prosecuted for almost driving California—and the entire Western United States—into bankruptcy.
And it happened during the "liberal" administration of President Bill Clinton.
Once the news broke that Enron had filed for bankruptcy, commentators almost universally oozed compassion for its thousands of employees who would lose their salaries and pensions.
No one, however, condemned the "profits at any cost" dedication of those same employees for pushing California to the brink of ruin.
To put this in historical perspective:
Imagine a historian writing about the destruction of Hitler's Schutzstaffel (Guard Detachment), or SS, as a human interest tragedy.
Imagine its Reichsfuhrer, Heinrich Himmler, being blamed for failing to prevent its collapse—as CEO Kenneth Lay was blamed for Enron's demise.
Imagine that same historian completely ignoring the horrific role the SS had played throughout Nazi-occupied countries—and its primary role in slaughtering six million Jews in the Holocaust.
Nor did the media urge the United States Department of Justice to end the extortion via RICO—the Federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act.
Passed by Congress in 1970, this was originally aimed at the kingpins of the Mafia. Since the mid-1980s, however, RICO has been successfully applied against both terrorist groups and legitimate businesses engaged in criminal activity.
Under RICO, people financially injured by a pattern of criminal activity can bring a claim in State or Federal court, and obtain damages at three times the amount of their actual claim, plus reimbursement for their attorneys' fees and costs.
Such prosecutions would have pitted energy-extortionists against the full investigative might of the FBI and the sweeping legal authority of the Justice Department.
Consider this selection from the opening of the Act:
(1) "racketeering activity" means (A) any act or threat involving…extortion; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: sections 891-894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud)Section 1344 (relating to financial institution fraud), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering)….
Today, two powerful social media companies—Facebook and Twitter—play pivotal and potentially dangerous roles in the lives of millions of men, women and children.
Facebook has invaded its users' privacy (such as via the Cambridge Analytica data scandal), manipulated elections (such as the 2016 Presidential one) and subjected its users to mass surveillance.
Twitter has allowed trolls to abuse its followers and spread dangerous lies to millions. For five years, its chief troll was Donald Trump, who libeled hundreds while falsely claiming that COVID-19 was a hoax and that he won re-election in 2020 but was cheated by fraud.
Such lies resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans from COVID—and poisoned the American electoral system for future races.
Yet in both cases, the Federal Government has stood by and allowed such abuses to continue unpunished. Yet it commands a wide range of agencies capable of addressing such abuses—such as the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and—not least importantly, the Justice Department.
Powerful, life-altering companies require powerful oversight—through the prism of the warning given by Niccolo Machiavelli more than 500 years ago:
All those who have written upon civil institutions demonstrate…that whoever desires to found a state and give it laws, must start with assuming that all men are bad and ever ready to display their vicious nature, whenever they may find occasion for it.
If their evil disposition remains concealed for a time, it must be attributed to some unknown reason; and we must assume that it lacked occasion to show itself. But time, which has been said to be the father of all truth, does not fail to bring it to light.
ABC NEWS, ABORTION, ADOLF HITLER, ALBERT SPEER, ALTERNET, AMERICABLOG, AP, ASSASSINATION, BABY BOOMER RESISTANCE, BBC, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BRETT KAVANAUGH, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, CLARENCE THOMAS, CNN, CROOKS AND LIARS, CZECHOSLOVAKIA, DAILY KOZ, DONALD TRUMP, DRUDGE REPORT, FACEBOOK, FINAL SOLUTION, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT, FOX NEWS, FRANKLIN GRAHAM, HARPER'S MAGAZINE, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HERMANN GOERING, HUFFINGTON POST, JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, LENI RIEFENSTAHL, LINDSEY GRAHAM, MARCO RUBIO, MEDIA MATTERS, MITCH MCCONNEL, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, NAZI GERMANY, NBC NEWS, NEW REPUBLIC, NEWSDAY, NEWSWEEK, NPR, PBS NEWSHOUR, POLITICO, POLITICUSUSA, RAND PAUL, RAW STORY, REINHARD HEYDRICH, REUTERS, ROLAND FREISLER, RON DESANTIS, RUDOLF HESS, SALON, SAMUEL ALITO, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SS, TALKING POINTS MEMO, TED CRUZ, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE DAILY BLOG, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE NEW YORKER, THE SUPREME COURT, THE VILLAGE VOICE, THE WASHINGTON POST, THINKPROGRESS, TIME, TRUTHDIG, TRUTHOUT, TUCKER CARLSON, TWITTER, TWO POLITICAL JUNKIES, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY, WANNSEE CONFERENCE
WHEN FASCISTS BECOME TARGETS
In Bureaucracy, Entertainment, History, Politics, Social commentary on May 9, 2022 at 12:10 am
In 1942, two British-trained Czech commandos assassinated SS Obergruppenführer (General) Reinhard Heydrich.
A tall, blond-haired former naval officer, he was both a champion fencer and talented violinist. Heydrich joined the Schutzstaffel, or Protective Squads, better known as the SS, in 1931, and quickly became head of its counterintelligence service.
Reinhard Heycrich
In September, 1941, Heydrich was appointed "Reich Protector" of Czechoslovakia, which had fallen prey to Germany in 1938 but whose citizens were growing restless under Nazi rule.
Heydrich immediately ordered a purge, executing 92 people within the first three days of his arrival in Prague. By February, 1942, 4,000-5,000 people had been arrested.
In January, 1942, Heydrich convened a meeting of high-ranking political and military leaders to streamline "the Final Solution to the Jewish Question."
At the now-infamous Wannsee conference, Heydrich decreed that, henceforth, all Jews in Reich-occupied territories would be shipped to extermination camps. No exceptions would be made for women, children or the infirm.
An estimated six million Jews were thus slaughtered.
Returning to Prague, Heydrich continued his policy of carrot-and-stick with the Czechs—improving the social security system and requisitioning luxury hotels for middle-class workers, alternating with arrests and executions.
The Czech government-in-exile, headquartered in London, feared that Heydrich's incentives might lead the Czechs to passively accept domination. They decided to assassinate Heydrich.
Two British-trained Czech commandos—Jan Kubis and Joseph Gabcik—parachuted into Prague.
Unexpectedly, they got help from Heydrich himself. Supremely arrogant, he traveled the same route every day from home to his downtown office and refused to be escorted by armed guards, claiming no one would dare attack him.
On May 27, 1942, Kubis and Gabcik waited at a hairpin turn in the road always taken by Heydrich. When Heydrich's Mercedes slowed down, Gabcik raised his machinegun–which jammed.
Rising in his seat, Heydrich aimed his revolver at Gabcik—as Kubis lobbed a hand grenade at the car. The explosion drove steel and leather fragments of the car's upholstery into Heydrich's diaphragm, spleen and lung.
Hitler dispatched doctors from Berlin to save the Reich Protector. But infection set in, and on June 4, Heydrich died at age 38.
The assassination sent shockwaves through the upper echelons of the Third Reich. No one had dared assault—much less assassinate—a high-ranking Nazi official.
Nazis had slaughtered tens of thousands without hesitation—or fear that the same might happen to them.
Suddenly they realized that the fury they had aroused could be turned against themselves.
Members of the Nazi government
Which brings us to the leaders of America's own Right-wing.
The names of infamous Nazis were widely known:
Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering;
Propaganda Minister Paul Joseph Goebbels;
Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess;
Propaganda Film Director Leni Riefenstahl;
SS-Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler;
"Hanging Judge" Roland Freisler;
Architect Albert Speer;
Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop;
SS Obergruoppenfuhrer Reinhard Heydrich; and
The most infamous Nazi of all: Adolf Hitler.
And so are the names of the infamous leaders of the American Right:
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell;
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett;
Texas Senator Ted Cruz;
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas;
Commentator Tucker Carlson;
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch;
Evangelist Franklin Graham;
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh;
Florida Senator Marco Rubio;
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito;
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis; and
The most infamous Right-winger of all: Former President Donald Trump.
The difference between these two infamous groups is this:
In Nazi Germany, ordinary Germans could not learn about the personal lives of their dictators—including their home addresses—and to conspire against them.
In the United States, ordinary citizens have an array of means to do this. They can turn to newspapers, TV and magazines. And if that isn't enough, "people finder" websites, for a modest price, provide addresses and names of relatives of potential targets.
In Nazi Germany, firearms were tightly controlled. In the United States, the Right's National Rifle Association has successfully lobbied to put lethal firepower into the hands of virtually anyone who wants it.
Which brings us to the firestorm now erupting over the publication of an initial draft majority opinion of the Supreme Court. Backed by the Court's five Right-wing Justices, it overturns the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.
In one to two months, millions of women will likely become victims of Right-wing anti-abortion fanaticism.
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, 23 states will institute bans, with trigger laws on the books in 13 of them. These are bans designed to take effect if Roe is overturned.
Republicans boast that they want to "get the government off the backs of the people." Yet since 1973 they have furiously tried to re-insert it into the vagina of every American woman.
Interfering with the right to obtain medical care—especially when it applies to sexually-involved matters—is an act guaranteed to arouse fury in even the most pacifistic men and women.
This is especially true when a political party—such as that of the Nazis and Republicans—makes clear its intention to rule by force, rather than by public consent.
Reinhard Heydrich believed himself invulnerable from the hatred of the enemies he had made. That arrogance cost him his life.
The day may soon come when America's own Right-wingers start learning the same lesson.
ABC NEWS, ADOLF HITLER, ALTERNET, AMERICABLOG, AP, BABY BOOMER RESISTANCE, BBC, BILL CLINTON, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BUZZFEED, CALIFORNIA ENERGY CRISIS, CBS NEWS, CHEVRON, CNN, COAL INDUSTRY, CROOKS AND LIARS, DAILY KOZ, DE-REGULATION, DEMOCRATS, ENRON, FACEBOOK, FBI, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT, GEORGE W. BUSH, GRAY DAVIS, HARPER'S MAGAZINE, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HOLOCAUST, HUFFINGTON POST, MAFIA, MEDIA MATTERS, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NBC NEWS, NEW REPUBLIC, NEWSDAY, NEWSWEEK, NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI, NPR, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC, PBS NEWSHOUR, PETE WILSON, POLITICO, POLITICUSUSA, RAW STORY, REPUBLICANS, REUTERS, RICO ACT, SALON, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SS, TALKING POINTS MEMO, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE DAILY BLOG, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE NEW YORKER, THE SS, THE VILLAGE VOICE, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE WASHINGTON POST, THINKPROGRESS, TIME, TRUTHDIG, TRUTHOUT, TWITTER, TWO POLITICAL JUNKIES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY, WONKETTE
DE-REGULATION: LET PREDATORS BE PREDATORS
In Bureaucracy, Business, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Politics, Social commentary on May 21, 2021 at 12:09 am
This December 2 will mark the 20th anniversary of the death of a criminal empire. An empire that almost destroyed the Western United States.
The Enron Corporation.
The California electricity crisis (2000-2001) was caused by extortionate market manipulations and illegal shutdowns of pipelines by Texas energy companies.
California suffered from multiple large-scale blackouts. Pacific Gas & Electric, one of the state's largest energy companies, collapsed, and the economic fall-out greatly harmed Governor Gray Davis' standing.
Under the pro-oil company administration of George W. Bush, no such prosecutions ever occurred. But Americans had a right to expect such redress under "liberal" President Bill Clinton.
Imagine a historian writing about the destruction of Adolf Hitler's Schutzstaffel (Guard Detachment), or SS, as a human interest tragedy.
Imagine its Reichsfuehrer, Heinrich Himmler, being blamed for failing to prevent its collapse—as CEO Kenneth Lay was blamed for Enron's demise.
Nor did anyone in the media or government declare that the solution to such extortionate activity lay within the United States Department of Justice via RICO—the Federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act.
With the 20th anniversary of Enron's demise coming up, the mantra of "de-regulation" should be ruthlessly turned against those who have most ardently championed it.
Republicans have ingeniously dubbed the estate tax—which affects only a tiny minority of ultra-rich—"the death tax." This makes it appear to affect everyone.
With the 2022 midterm elections fast approaching, Democrats should recast de-regulation thus:
"Greed Relief"
"Greed Protection"
"Legalized Extortion"
And here are some possible slogans:
"The Energy Industry: Giving You the Best Congress Money Can Buy."
"De-regulation: Let Criminals Be Criminals."
The coal industry has pumped millions into TV ads touting the non-existent wonders of "clean coal." And Chevron has spent millions assuring us that all its profits go strictly toward making the world a better place for others. (Presumably not a penny is left for its altruistic executives.)
When faced with such outright lying by the most vested of financial interests, it's well to recall the warning given by Niccolo Machiavelli more than 500 years ago:
2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ABC NEWS, ADAM SCHIFF, ADOLF HITLER, AFGHANISTAN, ALBERT SPEER, ALTERNET, AMERICABLOG, ANTIFA, AP, BABY BOOMER RESISTANCE, BARACK OBAMA, BLOOMBERG, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CHRIS CILLIZZA, CHRIS KREBS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, CIA, CNN, CORONAVIRUS, COVID-19, CROOKS AND LIARS, CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY, DAILY KOS, DAILY KOZ, DENMARK, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DISOBEYING HITLER: GERMAN RESISTANCE AFTER VALKYRIE (BOOK), DONALD TRUMP, DONALDL TRUMP JR., DRUDGE REPORT, FACEBOOK, FASCISM, FBI, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT, FRANCE, HARPER'S MAGAZINE, HERMANN GORING, HILLARY CLINTON, HUFFINGTON POST, IMPEACHMENT, IRAQ, JAKE TAPPER, JAMES B. COMEY, JARED KUSHNER, JOE BIDEN, MAIL-IN BALLOTS, MARK ESPER, MEDIA MATTERS, MIKE PENCE, MITCH MCCONNELL, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NAZI GERMANY, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NORWAY, NPR, PAUL MANAFORT, PBS NEWSHOUR, PLANNED PARENTHOOD, POLAND, POLITICO, POLITICUSUSA, RANDALL HANSEN, RAW STORY, REPUBLICAN PARTY, REPUBLICANS, REUTERS, RUSSIA, SALON, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SOVIET UNION, SS, STALINGRAD, TALKING POINTS MEMO, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE DAILY BLOG, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE PENTAGON, THE VILLAGE VOICE, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE WASHINGTON POST, THINKPROGRESS, TIME, TRUMP TOWER MEETING, TRUTHDIG, TRUTHOUT, TWITTER, TWO POLITICAL JUNKIES, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY, VLADIMIR PUTIN, VOTER FRAUD, WEHRMACHT, WERNER VON BLOMBERG, WERNER VON FRITCH, WONKETTE, WORLD WAR 11
HITLER, TRUMP AND "SCORCHED EARTH"—PART FOUR (END)
In Bureaucracy, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Military, Politics, Social commentary on November 26, 2020 at 12:14 am
On March 19, 1945, facing certain defeat, Nazi Fuhrer Adolf Hitler ordered a massive "scorched-earth" campaign throughout Germany:
"Destroy all German agriculture, industry, ships, communications, roads, food stuffs, mines, bridges, stores and utility plants!"
If implemented, it would deprive surviving Germans of even the barest necessities after the war.
Opposing him was Albert Speer, his favorite architect and Minister of Armaments.
Albert Speer and Adolf Hitler pouring over architectural plans
But Hitler refused to back down. He gave Speer 24 hours to reconsider his opposition to the order.
The next day, Speer told Hitler: "My Fuhrer, I stand unconditionally behind you!"
"Then all is well," said Hitler, suddenly with tears in his eyes.
"If I stand unreservedly behind you," said Speer, "then you must entrust me rather than the Gauleiters [district Party leaders serving as provincial governors] with the implementation of your decree."
Filled with gratitude, Hitler signed the decree Speer had thoughtfully prepared before their fateful meeting.
By doing so, Hitler unintentionally gave Speer the power to thwart his "scorched earth" order.
Trained as an architect, Speer had joined the Nazi Party in 1931. He met Hitler in 1933, when he presented the Fuhrer with architectural designs for the Nuremberg Rally scheduled for that year.
From then on, Speer became Hitler's "genius architect" assigned to create buildings meant to last for a thousand years. "If Hitler had been capable of friendship," Speer said after the war, "I would have been that friend."
In 1943, Hitler appointed him Minister of Armaments, charged with revitalizing the German war effort.
Nevertheless, Speer now crisscrossed Germany, persuading military leaders and district governors to not destroy the vital facilities that would be needed after the war.
"No other senior National Socialist could have done the job," writes Randall Hanson, author of Disobeying Hitler: German Resistance After Valkyrie.
"Speer was one of the very few people in the Reich—-perhaps even the only one—with such power to influence actors' willingness/unwillingness to destroy."
Despite his later conviction for war crimes at Nuremberg, Speer never regretted his efforts to save Germany from total destruction at the hands of Adolf Hitler.
As the Third Reich came to its fiery end, Adolf Hitler blamed the German people for being "unworthy" of his "genius" and losing the war he had started.
His attitude was: "If I can't rule Germany, then there won't be a Germany."
In his infamous "Nero Order," he decreed the destruction of everything still remaining–industries, ships, harbors, communications, roads, mines, bridges, stores, utility plants, food stuffs.
Fortunately for Germany, one man—Albert Speer—finally broke ranks with his Fuhrer.
Albert Speer
Risking death, he refused to carry out Hitler's "scorched earth" order. Even more important, he successfully blocked such destruction and persuaded influential military and civilian leaders to disobey the order as well.
As a result, those targets slated for destruction were spared.
Fast forward 75 years: Facing the end of his Presidency, Donald Trump desperately seeks to remain in power. Having "joked" about being "President-for-Life," he's now fighting to make that a reality.
Unlike his 44 predecessors, he rejects the will of the voters and for almost three weeks denied his successor access to the resources he needs to launch a smooth transition.
Even worse: Instead of showing concern for the country he claims to love, Trump is now relentlessly destroying those institutions that guarantee American freedom and safety:
The CIA
The FBI
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
His attitude clearly is: "If I can't rule America, there won't be an America."
Meanwhile, House and Senate Republicans have embraced his most outrageous lies—or refused to openly refute them—as the COVID-19 pandemic slaughters about 1,000 Americans a day.
Even Republicans who privately admit the Trump era is ending realize that 70 million hate-filled Americans voted for him in 2020. And eagerly await the coming of the next would-be Fuhrer.
They will also eagerly vote out of office any Republican who dares break with the man they worship like a cult leader.
For Congressional Republicans, staying in office—and keeping their power and perks—is their top priority.
On November 25, 2019, CNN political correspondent Jake Tapper interviewed Representative Adam Schiff on Donald Trump's upcoming impeachment trial for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
What would it mean if Republicans uniformly oppose any articles of impeachment against Trump? asked Tapper.
"It will have very long-term consequences, if that's where we end up," replied Schiff.
"And if not today, I think Republican members in the future, to their children and their grandchildren, will have to explain why they did nothing in the face of this deeply unethical man who did such damage to the country."
In the end, only one of 53 Republican Senators—Mitt Romney—dared to vote for impeachment. And he became an instant pariah for it.
On March 18, 1945, Albert Speer, opposing Hitler's plans to destroy Germany's infrastructure, addressed a memo to his Fuhrer, in which he wrote: "No one has the right to take the viewpoint that the fate of the German people is tied to his personal fate."
The country is still waiting for a Republican Albert Speer to step forward and save America from the self-destructive brutalities of its own would-be Fuhrer.
HITLER, TRUMP AND "SCORCHED EARTH"—PART THREE (OF FOUR)
President Donald Trump may be getting ready to fire his handpicked CIA director.
He believes that Gina Haspel has stonewalled the release of documents supposedly exposing "deep state" plots against his 2016 campaign during the Obama administration.
[In fact, the Obama administration acted entirely within the law during the 2016 Presidential campaign. The FBI has a legal mandate to keep track of subversive activities—especially when they involve members of a Presidential candidate's campaign.
[On July 9, 2016, high-ranking representatives of the Trump campaign met at Trump Tower with at least two lobbyists with ties to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.
Gina Haspel
[The participants included:
Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr.;
His son-in-law, Jared Kushner;
His then-campaign manager, Paul Manafort;
Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer with ties to Putin; and
Rinat Akhmetshin, a former Soviet counterintelligence officer suspected of "having ongoing ties to Russian Intelligence."
[The reason for the meeting: To dig up "dirt" the Russians might have on Hillary Clinton, Trump's opponent for the White House.]
Trump is also angry at FBI Director Christopher Wray—who replaced James B. Comey in May, 2017. Trump had fired Comey for daring to investigate ties between his 2016 campaign and Russian Intelligence agents.
Christopher Wray
The reason for his anger at Wray: Wray has dared to contradict Trump's false claims that
"Rampant voter fraud" was a widespread problem; and
Antifa poses a greater terrorism danger than white supremacist groups.
During the 2016 Presidential race, Russian propaganda played a major role in convincing millions of Americans to vote for Donald Trump. Social media platforms—especially Facebook and Twitter—were flooded with genuinely fake news to sow discord among Americans and create a pathway for Trump's election.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, a former KGB officer, had quickly assessed Trump as an egotistical narcissist. By appealing to Trump's vanity, Putin expected to sharply reduce the military and political threat the United States represented to a resurgent Russia.
So notorious was the role played by Russian hackers in misleading American voters in 2016 that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was determined to prevent a repetition in 2020.
The man ultimately tasked with this mission was Chris Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency run by DHS.
Chris Krebs
Krebs launched a massive effort to counter lies spread by Russians—and Americans—on social media platforms. Among his duties:
Sharing Intelligence from agencies such as the CIA and National Security Agency with local officials about foreign efforts at election interference.
Ensuring that domestic voting equipment was secure.
Attacking domestic information head-on.
As a result, Krebs was widely praised for revamping the department's cybersecurity efforts and increasing coordination with state and local governments.
By all accounts—except Trump's—the 2020 election went very smoothly.
On November 17, Trump fired Chris Krebs.
The reason: Krebs had not only countered Russian propaganda lies—he had dared to counter Trump's as well. For example: He rejected Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud: There "is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
Trump fired Krebs by tweet—and accompanied the outrage with yet another lie:
"The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud, including dead people voting, poll watchers not allowed into polling locations, glitches in the voting machines which changed votes from Trump to Biden, late voting, and many more. Therefore, effective immediately, Chris Krebs has been terminated as director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency."
In a November 17 story on the CNN website, CNN reporters Kaitlan Collins and Paul LeBlanc bluntly concluded:
"[Krebs'] dismissal underscores the lengths Trump is willing to go to punish those who don't adopt his conspiratorial view of the election.
"Since CNN and other outlets called the race for President-elect Joe Biden, Trump has refused to accept the results, instead pushing baseless conspiracies that his second term is being stolen.
"This includes falsely claiming during an election night address that he had already won reelection, that he had won states that were actually still up in the air at the time and that his opponents were perpetrating a fraud."
Seventy-five years earlier, on March 19, 1945, facing certain defeat, Adolf Hitler ordered a massive "scorched-earth" campaign throughout Germany.
All German agriculture, industry, ships, communications, roads, food stuffs, mines, bridges, stores and utility plants were to be destroyed.
If implemented, it would deprive the entire German population of even the barest necessities after the war.
Opposing him—at first openly, and later secretly—was Albert Speer, his former architect and now Minister of Armaments.
Speer argued that there must be a future for the German people: "If our enemies wish to destroy us, why help them? We must leave the people something."
But Hitler refused to back down: "I don't want to hear any more."
He gave Speer 24 hours to reconsider his opposition to the order.
Speer could not directly promise to carry out Hitler's "scorched earth" order. So he gave Hitler a vague answer that essentially committed him to nothing: "My Fuhrer, I stand unconditionally behind you!"
HITLER, TRUMP AND "SCORCHED EARTH"—PART TWO (OF FOUR)
On November 3, Joe Biden became President-elect of the United States by winning 79,658,000 votes, or 51% of the vote, compared to 73,886,400 votes, or 47.2% of the vote cast for President Donald Trump.
In the Electoral College—which actually determines the winner—the results were even more stunning: 306 votes for Biden, compared with 232 for Trump. It takes 270 votes to be declared the victor.
Despite this, Trump has steadfastly refused to concede. He has made a series of baseless claims that he was cheated of victory by vote fraud. By illegal aliens being allowed to vote. By a sinister computer program that turned Trump votes into Biden ones.
He has repeatedly filed legal challenges to the vote, claiming himself the victim of massive fraud. This despite the utter lack of evidence of it.
On November 13, nine cases meant to attack President-elect Joe Biden's win in key states were denied or dropped. A law firm challenging the vote count in Pennsylvania withdrew from the effort.
In Michigan, his attorneys dropped their federal suit to block the certification of Detroit-area ballots.
By November 21, Trump had lost in 30 cases dismissed by judges or withdrawn by his own attorneys.
Meanwhile, top Republicans—such as Vice President Mike Pence and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—have refused to congratulate Biden as the winner.
In a November 17 analysis, entitled " "Donald Trump Doesn't Seem to Want to Do His Job Anymore," CNN Editor-at-Large Chris Cillizza wrote:
While Trump has relentlessly asserted that he won the 2020 election, "he's done next to nothing—at least publicly—to suggest he plans to continue doing the job in any serious manner through January 20."
According to Cillizza, since losing the election, Trump has filled his days with:
Making controversial military decisions
Firing people
Golfing: He played golf at his club in Virginia twice on the weekend of November 14-15. He was golfing the previous weekend, when Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 race by CNN and other media outlets.
Tweeting: He has tweeted numerous lies and conspiracy theories, claiming he won a second term but was cheated by the counting of fraudulent votes. This has let Twitter to flag a large number of his tweets as "inaccurate."
Making controversial military decisions: The Pentagon signaled it was planning—on Trump's orders—to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. [American forces have been warring with the Taliban in Afghanistan since 2001; they have been warring against Iraqi insurgents since 2003.]
And in a move that is truly frightening: The New York Times reported that Trump asked his top advisers for options to strike at Iran's nuclear capabilities before he left office. This would embroil the United States in a war that could easily turn nuclear.
Firing people: On November 9, Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. Four senior civilian officials have since been fired or resigned—Esper's chief of staff and the top officials overseeing policy and intelligence. They were replaced with flunkies loyal to Trump personally.
[This was in fact how Adolf Hitler took control of the Wehrmacht.
[Since taking command of Germany in the summer of 1934, Hitler wanted to replace two high-ranking military officials: General Werner von Fritsch and Colonel General Werner von Blomberg. Both were convinced that Hitler's increasingly aggressive foreign policy was putting Germany on a collision course with war—a war the Fatherland could not win.
[Hitler, in fact, meant to go to war—and despised Fritsch's and Blomberg's hesitation to do so. He decided to rid himself of both men.
[On January 12, 1938, Blomberg married Erna Gruhn, with Hitler and Reichsmarshall Hermann Goring attending as witnesses. Soon afterward, Berlin police discovered that Gruhn had a criminal record as a prostitute and had posed for pornographic photographs.
[Marrying a woman with such a background violated the standard of conduct expected of German officers. Hitler saw the scandal as an opportunity to dispose of Blomberg—who was forced to resign.
[Shortly after Blomberg was forced out in disgrace, the SS—Hitler's private police force—presented Hitler with a file that falsely accused Werner von Fritsch of homosexuality. Fritsch angrily denied the accusation but resigned on February 4, 1938.
[From that point on, Hitler was in de facto command of the German Armed Services.]
Eighty-two years later, on November 3, 2020, President Donald Trump lost the 2020 Presidential election to former Vice President Joe Biden.
But that hasn't stopped him from behaving as if he—not Biden—will take the oath of President on January 20, 2021.
Besides wreaking havoc on the Pentagon, Trump is reportedly going to fire CIA Director Gina Haspel and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Trump has accused Haspel of stonewalling the release of documents that would supposedly expose "deep state" plots against Trump's campaign and transition during the Obama administration.
[In fact, the Obama administration acted entirely within the law during the 2016 Presidential campaign. The FBI has a legal mandate to keep track of subversive activities—especially when they involve members of a Presidential candidate's campaign.]
HITLER, TRUMP AND "SCORCHED EARTH—PART ONE (OF FOUR)
Albert Speer, Minister of Armaments for the Third Reich, was appalled.
His Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler—the man he had idolized for 14 years—had just passed a death sentence on Germany, the nation he claimed to love above all others.
On September 1, 1939, Hitler had triggered World War II with the invasion of Poland. This led to a series of quick, spectacular victories—over Poland, Norway, Denmark and France.
Then, on June 22, 1941, Hitler turned on his ally, the Soviet Union, with which he had signed a non-aggression pact in August, 1939.
It had taken the Wehrmacht six weeks to conquer France. Hitler believed that was how long it would take to defeat the Soviet Union.
German soldiers invading the Soviet Union
Again, a series of spectacular battlefield victories followed—before the Wehrmacht was halted at the gates of Moscow. A year later, still enmeshed in Russia, the turning point came at Stalingrad, with the loss of the elite Sixth Army and 800,000 soldiers.
Starting in 1943, the Red Army slowly but steadily regained ground it had lost—the western half of Russia—and began pushing back the Germans. By March, 1945, it was fighting inside Germany—and heading straight for its capital: Berlin.
On March 19, 1945, facing certain defeat, Hitler ordered a massive "scorched-earth" campaign throughout Germany.
If implemented, it would deprive the entire German population of even the barest necessities after the war. And he entrusted the campaign to Albert Speer, his favorite architect-turned-Minister-of-Armaments.
Click here: Hitler's "Scorched Earth" Decree and Albert Speer's Response
Now living in a bunker 50 feet below bomb-shattered Berlin, Hitler gave full vent to his most destructive impulses.
Adolf Hitler addressing boy soldiers as the Third Reich crumbles
"If the war is lost," Hitler told Speer, "the nation will also perish. This fate is inevitable. There is no necessity to take into consideration the basis which the people will need to continue even a most primitive existence.
"On the contrary, it will be better to destroy these things ourselves, because this nation will have proved to be the weaker one and the future will belong solely to the stronger eastern nation.
"Besides, those who will remain after the battle are only the inferior ones, for the good ones have all been killed."
Seventy-five years after Adolf Hitler planned the destruction of Germany, Donald Trump now plans the same fate for the United States.
On November 3, Trump lost his bid to win another four years as President of the United States. In the early hours of November 4, he poured out his fury and self-pity in a televised address from the White House:
"Millions and millions of people voted for us tonight, and a very sad group of people is trying to disenfranchise that group of people and we won't stand for it, we will not stand for it."
For a man who had tried—often successfully—to deprive millions of their right to vote, Trump made it clear that he didn't know what disenfranchisement means.
Sounding like a petulant child whose party has been called off, Trump continued:
"We were getting ready for a big celebration, we were winning everything and all of a sudden it was just called off. The results tonight have been phenomenal…I mean literally we were just all set to get outside and just celebrate something that was so beautiful, so good, such a vote, such a success."
It was Trump-–not his challenger, former Vice President Joe Biden—who was demanding that the electoral process be halted. And that those votes that had not yet been counted be, in effect, flushed down the toilet.
"The citizens of this country have come out in record numbers, this a record, there's never been anything like it to support our incredible movement….Most importantly, we're winning Pennsylvania by a tremendous amount of votes. We're up 690,000 votes."
Owing to the Coronavirus pandemic—which Trump had refused to aggressively address from its outset in January—millions of Americans had voted by mail. The idea of standing in Coronavirus-infected lines had not appealed to them. And they believed they could perform their civic duty in a far less dangerous way via the Postal Service.
"These aren't even close, this is not like, Oh, it's close. With 64% of the vote in, it's going to be almost impossible and we're coming into good Pennsylvania areas where they happen to like your president. We're winning Michigan…I said 'Wow, that's a lot'…
"And we're winning Wisconsin…so when you take those three states in particular and you take all of the others…and all of a sudden it's not like we're up 12 votes and we have 60% left, we won states and all of a sudden, I said, 'What happened to the election? It's off.' And we have all these announcers saying, 'What's happened' and then they said, 'Ohhh.'"
But this did not alter the reality that Joe Biden became President-elect of the United States by winning 79,106,010 votes, or 51% of the vote.
2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, ABC NEWS, ABUSE OF POWER, ADAM SCHIFF, ADOLF HITLER, ALAN DERSHOWITZ, ALTERNET, AMERICABLOG, AP, ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, BABY BOOMER RESISTANCE, BILL TAYLOR, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CNN, CROOKS AND LIARS, DAILY KOZ, DEMOCRATS, DONALD TRUMP, DRUDGE RETORT, FACEBOOK, FIONA HILL, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT, HARPER'S MAGAZINE, HEINRICH HIMMLER, HUNTER BIDEN, IMPEACHMENT, JEWS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN ROBERTS, JOSEPH BIDEN, LAURA COOPER, MARIE YOVANOVICH, MEDIA MATTERS, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NPR, OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS, PBS NEWSHOUR, POLITICO, POLITICUSUSA, RAND PAUL, RAW STORY, REPUBLICANS, REUTERS, SALON, SCHUTZSTAFFEL, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, SS, TALKING POINTS MEMO, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE DAILY BLOG, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HOLOCAUST, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE PENTAGON, THE VILLAGE VOICE, THE WASHINGTON POST, THINKPROGRESS, TIME, TRUTHDIG, TRUTHOUT, TWITTER, TWO POLITICAL JUNKIES, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UKRAINE, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES SENATE, UPI, USA TODAY, VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY, WHERMACHT, WITNESSES, WONKETTE
HIMMLER/TRUMP: "MY CRIMES ARE NOW YOUR CRIMES"
On October 4, 1943, SS-Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler addressed SS officers stationed in Posen, Poland, about the ongoing campaign to exterminate the Jews of Europe.
He gave a similar speech two days later to an audience of Reichsleiters (national leaders) and Gauleiters (governors), as well as other government representatives.
Himmler intended to alert Reich officials of the extermination campaign the Schutzstaffel ("Protective Squads")—otherwise known as the SS—and Wehrmacht (German army) had been waging since June, 1941.
The purpose: To make his listeners accessories to his monumental crimes—and to warn them there was no turning back.
Either Nazi Germany won the war that its Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler, had unintentionally unleashed on September 1, 1939—or its topmost officials would themselves face extinction as war criminals.
Said Himmler:
"I want to also mention a very difficult subject before you, with complete candor. It should be discussed amongst us, yet nevertheless, we will never speak about it in public. I am talking about the evacuation of the Jews, the extermination of the Jewish people.
"It is one of those things that is easily said: 'The Jewish people is being exterminated.'…Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when 500 are there or when there are 1000. And to have seen this through and—with the exception of human weakness—to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned….
"But altogether we can say: We have carried out this most difficult task for the love of our people. And we have suffered no defect within us, in our soul, in our character."
Fast forward 76 years—to January, 2020.
On December 18, 2019, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives approved two Articles of Impeachment against President Donald Trump:
Article 1: Abuse of Power: For pressuring Ukraine to assist him in his re-election campaign by damaging former Vice President Joseph Biden, his possible 2020 Democratic rival; and
Article 2: Obstruction of Congress: For obstructing Congress by blocking testimony of subpoenaed witnesses and refusing to provide documents in response to House subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry.
Trump's defense in the House had consisted of:
Refusing to testify himself;
Refusing to produce witnesses on his behalf;
Refusing to turn over requested documents;
Claiming that Democrats were preventing him from testifying or producing witnesses;
Ordering administration officials to not testify before the six House impeachment committees investigating his behavior.
Those government employees who testified did so voluntarily—and at risk of retaliation. Among these were:
Ukraine ambassador Bill Taylor;
Laura Cooper, the top Pentagon official overseeing Ukraine-related U.S. policy;
Former White House official Fiona Hill; and
Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.
They offered damning testimony against Trump.
When the trial began in the United States Senate on January 16, 2020, Trump's legal team:
Did not call any witnesses;
Did not deny that Trump had sought to coerce Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into interfering with the 2020 election;
Attacked Joseph and Hunter Biden as if they were on trial;
Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul submitted a written question to presiding Chief Justice John Roberts that included the name of the alleged whistleblower to Trump's coercion. Roberts refused to read it aloud;
Paul raced outside the Senate and gave a press conference, where he named the alleged whistleblower—whose identity is protected by law.
Perhaps even more frightening: One of Trump's attorneys, Alan Dershowitz, offered Trump—and all future Presidents—a blanket of immunity worthy of a king:
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment. Every public official that I know believes that his election is of the public interest."
Responding to that argument, House Manager Adam Schiff (D-CA) said: "It's been a remarkable evolution of the presidential defense. It began with, 'None of that stuff happened here.' It began with "Nothing to see here.' It migrated to, 'OK, they did seek investigations of the president's political rival.' And then it became 'OK.'"
Meanwhile, the Senate majority of 53 Republicans vigorously supported Trump's demand that no witnesses to his crimes be allowed to testify.
Fast forward to November 3, 2020: Former Vice President Joe Biden defeats Trump for a second term by winning 79,106,010 votes, or 51% of the vote. Trump received 73,363,734 votes, or 47.3% of the vote.
Trump's reaction:
Denying that he lost.
Accusing Democrats of committing massive voter fraud—without offering any evidence to prove it.
Blocking cooperation with the incoming Biden administration.
Ignoring the raging COVID-19 pandemic as it kills about 1,000 Americans each day.
And how are Republicans reacting to all this? By publicly supporting Trump's stonewalling—or refusing to oppose it.
By following the same strategy as Heinrich Himmler, Donald Trump has entangled Republicans in his own crimes.
His infamy is now theirs.
History has brutally condemned those Germans who, knowing the full extent of Adolf Hitler's crimes, nevertheless signed on to perpetuate and conceal them.
History will render the same damning verdict against Senate and House Republicans who have provided similar cover for Donald Trump.
OlderEntries »
Steffen White's Email: Chistka@aol.com Former reporter, legal investigator and troubleshooter. Columnist at Bureaucracybuster.com. Fighting political and bureaucratic arrogance, incompetence and/or indifference.
Kraay-Z-Marketing Affordable Custom Web Design
McBride & Associates Investigative Services Providing timely, accurate and confidential information to the Legal, Financial and Business communities.
When making complaints in writing, carefully review your email or letter before sending it. Remove any words that are vulgar or profane. Don't make sweeping accusations: "Your agency is a waste."
Don't attribute motives to people you've had problems with, such as: "The postal clerk refused to help me because he's a drunk." If the person actually appeared to be drunk, then be precise in your description: "As he leaned over the counter I could smell beer on his breath. Behind him, in a waste basket, I saw an empty bottle of Coors beer."
Show how the failure of the official to address your problem reflects badly on the company or agency: "This is not the level of service your ads would lead potential customers to expect."
If necessary, note any regulatory agencies that can make life rough for the company or agency if your complaint isn't resolved. For the phone company, for example, cite the FCC or the PUC. But do this only after you have stated you hope your complaint can be settled amicably and privately within the company.


Property sector
Millennials shun pensions — but why are they all property mad?
There is one piece of 'stuff' all young people want to own — a house
Jonathan Eley
Add to myFT
© FT
Millennials shun pensions — but why are they all property mad? on twitter (opens in a new window)
Millennials shun pensions — but why are they all property mad? on facebook (opens in a new window)
Millennials shun pensions — but why are they all property mad? on linkedin (opens in a new window)
Millennials shun pensions — but why are they all property mad? on whatsapp (opens in a new window)
Jump to comments sectionPrint this page
The FT captured the millennial zeitgeist with last week's feature on the spending habits of 20-somethings, but the theme of financial change also resonated in the Eley household.
My children were born just after Y2K, but they have all the millennial traits. I spent my paper round money in Our Price record shops. To the iPad generation, the thought of a paper round seems absurd. They are more likely to spend their pocket money at Nandos, and who buys CDs or DVDs when you've got Spotify and Netflix?
But there is a great anomaly amid all this living for the moment. Millennials may prefer to experience rather than accumulate, but there is one piece of "stuff" they all want to own, even though it costs a fortune and ties them down for decades: a house.
One reader's response to last week's feature summed it up: "My biggest wish is to own my own home and everyone around me says the same . . . Our appetite for pension saving is much lower than owning a property."
This is in contrast to past generations, who dutifully put their money into endowment policies and pensions week after week, but had little expectation of home ownership. My dad happened to be visiting last week, and informed us all that he and my mum were only able to buy a house in 1966 because his uncle worked for a building society, which swung their mortgage application.
Their next home, bought in 1971 during the "Barber boom", stretched them to the limit. Generations before that had little hope of ownership; my grandmother lived in rented accommodation for all of her 89 years. At my age (mid-forties), my great-grandfather and his family had only just moved out of rented rooms.
Renting in those days was pretty grim. By and large, it still is; the quality of housing is patchy and decline of social housing has left tenants facing arbitrary rent rises and insecure tenancies. At the same time, credit has become much more widely available — and cheaper.
During my dad's 31 years as a mortgagee, the Bank of England's base rate varied between 5 per cent and 17 per cent. Today it is 0.5 per cent and interest rate futures suggest it could stay there until 2019. Disposable incomes are higher, too; the starting rate of income tax was 30 per cent or more until the late 1980s, and women did not have their own personal allowance until 1990.
The fact that buying has become cheaper, easier and more attractive than renting is not the only factor. To many millennials, housing is seen as the key to their long-term financial security. Perception is not reality, of course; for the 47 million Britons who don't live in south-east England, long-term house price performance has been acceptable rather than spectacular.
Take my own parents' house, which is valued at about 4.5 times what they paid for it in 1987. That might sound impressive, but it equates to compound annual growth of 5.3 per cent before inflation. If it were sold now and converted to an annuity, it would generate £15,700 per year (with no inflation uplift). And my dad would still need somewhere to live.
Yet the siren song of home ownership still seduces young and old. Behavioural economics helps explain why. House prices have risen substantially in recent years. Every lurch higher is faithfully reported by national newspapers and television stations. They are overwhelmingly based in and around London, ground zero for house price inflation and rentier economics.
By contrast, shares, the main vehicle for modern pension saving, have been volatile. When the stock market makes the evening news or the front pages, it is usually because it has tanked. The FTSE has recovered most its recent losses, but no newsreader has popped up to announce that "billions were wiped back on to markets today as share prices recovered". You will hear all about Tesco's accounting scandal, but not that shares in Ashtead, a FTSE 100 plant hire group, have risen 2,000 per cent in seven years.
Even more significant than the propaganda is the policy. Property has long been tax advantaged: primary residences are exempt from capital gains tax and most of them will soon be exempt from inheritance tax too. Increasing ownership rates has long been a government objective. The sale of council homes reinforced the message that only losers rent. On top of that, Whitehall has a direct vested interest in rising house prices through Help to Buy, since it receives a percentage of a home's value when it is sold on.
Millennials may or may not be "annoying". But their desperation to own property at any cost is more rational than it looks. They don't need a financial adviser to tell them that they can borrow stacks of money cheaply to juice the returns from an asset whose price has been rising for much of their adult lives.
They know that the government is so wedded to rising house prices that it will never withdraw the fiscal punch bowl. Choosing between property and pensions — complicated, inflexible products that politicians just cannot stop fiddling about with — is like choosing between fine wine and sour milk. I mean, WTF would you do?
Jonathan Eley is deputy editor of the FT's Lex column; jonathan.eley@ft.com
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section
Follow the topics in this article


Author Guest Post: The Songs of Three Day Summer by Sarvenaz Tash
About the Book: (from Goodreads) Michael is unsure about most things. Go to college? Enlist in the military? Break up with his girlfriend? All big question marks. He is living for the moment and all he wants is a few days at the biggest concert of the summer.
Cora lives in the town hosting the music festival. She's volunteering in the medical tent. She's like that, always the good girl. But there is something in the air at this concert and suddenly Cora finds herself wanting to push her own boundaries.
When Michael and Cora meet, sparks fly, hearts race, and all the things songs are written about come true. And all the while, three days of the most epic summer await them...
I am excited to welcome author Sarvenaz Tash to GreenBeanTeenQueen! Her newest book, Three Day Summer, is all about Woodstock. She captures the atmosphere and the music and I wanted to know more about the music in the book and the playlists she made to get inspired to write. I love this playlist and listening to it gets me in the mood for summer (and to read Sarvenaz's awesome book!) Be sure to check out the rest of her tour stops as well!
It will probably come as no surprise that I love the music of the 1960s. And although I myself was a teenager during the bizarre grunge/pop hybrid that was the mid- to late '90s, I actually spent most of my high school years listening to this music instead.
I made two Spotify playlists to go with my Woodstock love story, Three Day Summer. One features the songs—and in some cases, some of the very performances—that my two main characters Cora and Michael hear during the festival itself. The other I like to refer to as my "'60s milieu" playlist, and I filled it with not only some of my favorite songs of the decade, but some of the tunes that I think best embody the many facets of it: from its socially conscious anthems to its feel-good pop to its trippy soundscapes. (I do have one strong caveat: Beatles songs are not available on Spotify and that's the only reason they are not included on this list!)
Here then are the songs I chose for the Three Day Summer—In the Mood soundtrack (followed, of course, by the playlist itself!):
"Turn! Turn! Turn! (To Everything There Is a Season)" The Byrds
Between the out-of-this-world harmonies and the profound lyrics (partially taken from the Bible no less!), this is just one of those songs that makes me feel calm, reflective, and peaceful. I thought it was fitting since the peace sign is one of the most enduring symbols of the 1960s.
"Happy Together" The Turtles
True to its title, this song just makes me feel toe-tappingly happy and, I think, is indicative of the some of the best pop to come out of the decade. Plus it's about being head over heels in love which, of course, also goes along with the book.
"Piece of My Heart" Janis Joplin
I'm not sure it's possible to find a more gutsy and gut-wrenching performance of a song that's both about heartbreak and about girl power. (This line: "I'm going to show you, baby, that a woman can be tough" is a particular favorite to belt out in the shower! Amiright, ladies?). Janis plays an important role in the book and she performed this song at Woodstock too!
"America" Simon & Garfunkel
Another song with harmonies that slay me in the best way. I also think the lyrics portray both the hope and the heartache that came with the changing face of what it was to be young in 1960s America.
"You Keep Me Hangin' On" The Supremes
The sound of Motown was a huge, indelible part of the 1960s and The Supremes were for sure the queens of it.
"Build Me Up Buttercup" The Foundations
Yes, this has played at every Sweet 16 you've been to since the beginning of time (or, at least, since 1968) but there's a reason for it: you simply must sing and dance along to its unshakeable beat.
"Somebody to Love" Jefferson Airplane
From another Woodstock performer, I love the contrast of this song to the one before it and I think it's a great example of some of the more psychedelic sounds of the decades. Plus lead singer Grace Slick is another fantastic rocker chick that embodies the feminist spirit of the decade.
"Don't Worry Baby" The Beach Boys
You can't love the '60s without loving the beautiful harmonies of The Beach Boys and this one is one of my very favorite love songs of theirs . . . that also just happens to be about drag racing.
"These Boots Are Made for Walkin'" Nancy Sinatra
Remember all that girl power I mentioned before? In the age of Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan, this kiss-off anthem just fits right in. Plus I know that Nancy wore a lot of fabulous go-go boots to perform it—and what is more '60s than that?!
"Joy to the World" Three Dog Night
The lyrics don't make a whole lot of sense (why is this person friends with a bullfrog?!) but you can't help singing along anyway as this ode to the world is quite joyous indeed.
"I'm a Believer" The Monkees
Full confession: The Monkees were my first-ever concert (see the first paragraph of this post) and I've adored them for practically as long as I can remember. Though they started out as a made-for-TV Beatles parody band, they ended up with some truly spectacular songs in their oeuvre. This bouncy number is a particular favorite.
"Bad Moon Rising" Creedence Clearwater Revival
Also performed at Woodstock, this song comes in at a key point in the story. I also think it has a particular rock/bluegrass vibe that was a big part of the '60s sound.
"Time of the Season" The Zombies
I find this song both sultry and trippy, which I think showcases yet another facet of the decade.
"My Generation" The Who
The ultimate anthem for the teen population of the 1960s? I think so! Of course, I'm not sure how the Who feel now about belting out lyrics like "I hope I die before I grow old" but I think that it's hard to find a song that better embodies the universal feeling of being young and misunderstood.
"A Change Is Gonna Come" Sam Cooke
A song that remains as beautiful and pertinent today as it did when it came out, Cooke was directly singing about the civil rights movement of the 1960s and the hope for a better tomorrow that led so many to fight for equality.
Follow the Tour:
What a Nerd Girl Says
http://whatanerdgirlsays.com/
Tues, May 12
http://www.greenbeanteenqueen.com/
Mother Daughter Book Club
http://motherdaughterbookclub.com/
Thurs, May 14
Curling Up with a Good Book
http://curling-up-with-a-good-book.blogspot.com/
Mon, May18
http://thehidingspot.blogspot.com/
Adventures of a Book Junkie
http://toofondofbooks.com/
Proseandkahn
http://proseandkahn.blogspot.com/
http://hauntedorchid.blogspot.com/
Word Spelunker
http://wordspelunking.blogspot.com/
author guest posts Blog Tour
Labels: author guest posts Blog Tour
Sarvenaz Tash May 12, 2015 at 2:13 PM
Thank you so much for hosting this post and playlist, Sarah!
Britt May 20, 2015 at 12:52 PM
I love ALL of these songs!! I need this book!
❤Britt
The Hardest Part of Summer Reading
Author Guest Post: Julie Mata-Kate Walden Directs ...
Anna Banks Interview-Joyride Blog Tour PLUS Giveaway
Middle School Princess Blog Tour PLUS Giveaway
Author Guest Post: The Songs of Three Day Summer b...


May 1, 2015 May 1, 2015 J.R. LeMar
Why Are They Making a Remake of "ROOTS"?!?
One of the biggest TV events of all time is being reimagined for new audiences.
"Roots," the epic miniseries about an African-American slave and his descendants, had a staggering audience of over 100 million viewers back in 1977. Now A&E networks are remaking the miniseries, to air in 2016.
A&E, Lifetime and History (formerly the History Channel) announced Thursday that the three networks would simulcast a remake of the saga of Kunta Kinte, an African who was captured, shipped to America and sold into slavery to work on a Virginia plantation.
LeVar Burton, who portrayed Kinte in the original, will co-executive produce the new miniseries.
Here we go again. Why?
Seriously, why?!?
I've watched the original miniseries several times during my life, including first when I was a little kid, and I also read the book as an adult. It's a great gripping, and at times uncomfortable, story, telling about a part of American history that needs to be told. But it was done perfectly before. Do we need a do-over?
For the record, I'm not one of those folks who just decries movie remakes and reboots in general, even though there probably are way too many of those in Hollywood. But this is a general complaint I have when it comes to Black movies and Black filmmakers. The recent trend seems to be the only "Black" movies getting made are either Kevin Hart's ghetto comedies or retro films about slavery and the 1960's. I mean THE BUTLER, and 12 YEARS A SLAVE, and SELMA, and so on, okay I get it, history is important, but is this ALL "we" can do?
We're also getting a movie version of GOOD TIMES, set in the 1960's.
I'd like to challenge Black filmmakers, and filmmakers of Color in general, to stop mining the past, and look to the future. Step outside the box that it seems we've self-imposed on ourselves, and start competing with the Spielberg's and Whedon's. Where's the Black Star Trek, the Black Star Wars, the Black Lord of The Rings, and the Black Harry Potter?
No, I don't literally mean making "Black" versions of those movies. What I mean is I'd like to see Black writers and directors branching out into science fiction, space opera, fantasy, and genres like that. Instead of fighting for roles in established franchises, make our own. I want a big-budget CGI-filled story set in outer space or far in the future, with a multicultural cast. Don't tell me that "Black movies" don't sell overseas. Look at the Fast and Furious franchise, which is a worldwide phenomenon with a multicultural cast (with prominent leading roles for women). Or instead of complaining about the lack of diversity in Game of Thrones or The Lord Of The Rings, creating a new multicultural fantasy world, with Wizards and dragons and non-White people.
C'mon, Morgan Freeman has played GOD twice, surely he can play a wise old Wizard?
So that's my challenge to Black filmmakers. I'm not saying stories of the past can't or should't be told. But let's diversify things a bit.
And, hey, if you want to tall stories about ancient history, how about being a bit more creative about it? There are some stories that REALLY need to be told. We can't count on others to tell our history accurately so why not something like. . .
If that movie was real I'd watch the s**t out of it!
Black filmmakers
Black movies don't sell overseas
Black science fiction films
multicutural representations in films
Remake of "ROOTS"
Roots by Alex Haley
Previous Tricky Dick Morris
Next 5 Comic-book Movies (That Aren't From D.C. or Marvel) That I Wish Were Getting Made
netrigan says:
I don't really have a problem with it. I don't think TV from the 70s and 80s have aged terribly well and I could see today's production values helping get this story out to a new generation of viewers.
americanliberaltimes says:
I believe that if they are re-making "Roots" it probably has a lot more to do with market share, profits, the bottom line and money in general than it does to serve any altruism. Of course I could be wrong about that.
James Lott Jr CTACC says:
They need to leave it alone. There are other slave stories to tell.
Remembering "REMEMBER THE TIME" by Michael Jackson | iBLOGalot says:
[…] Yes, I admit, it's a little odd that he's the "least-Black" looking person in the video but, still, he's sending a powerful cultural message, without beating you over the head with it. Heck, as I've said before, this is the kind of movie I wish Black filmmakers were making today! […]