ICR in top five in the world for academic influence and commercial impact
The Institute of Cancer Research, London has ranked among the top higher education institutions in the world for the impact of its research academically and commercially.
U-Multirank, an annual independent evaluation funded by the European Commission, assesses universities worldwide on a number of parameters, including the quality and impact of their research and the success with which they collaborate with other academic institutions and industry.
The ICR was ranked third in the world for the citation rate of scientific research published across all fields – following only Rockefeller University and MIT. And we also ranked third worldwide for top-cited research publications – those that appear in a field's most frequently cited 10 per cent of papers in that year. This is clear confirmation of the impact that the ICR's discoveries have on cancer research and treatment.
Read case studies of how the ICR's Enterprise Unit has collaborated with a range of industrial partners to transform ideas into new products for the benefit of cancer patients.
Top for patent citations
Our impact is further confirmed by our top position worldwide, for the second year running, for the proportion of our research publications that are cited in patents – highlighting the impact the ICR has on turning our scientific discoveries into innovative new medicines and technologies.
Also for the second year running, the ICR came fifth worldwide and first in the UK for the proportion of its publications to feature an industry co-author, in an illustration of the way we effectively work with industry to achieve benefits for patients.
Overall, the ICR placed 27th globally out of 1,225 higher education institutions when measured across seven research criteria – and sixth overall out of 144 UK universities.
Of the seven categories, the ICR scored a top A grade in six – only performing less strongly in the category for absolute number of publications published, in which we were handicapped by our smaller size compared with some of our high-profile peers.
Rankings show 'ICR's global reach'
Dr Barbara Pittam, Director of Academic Services at the ICR, said: "These rankings show once again the ICR's global reach, our influence with our peers and the impact our scientific research is having in the commercial sector. We see these measures as powerful proxies of our success in influencing cancer research and treatment worldwide and ensuring our findings benefit patients through partnership with industry."
Professor Paul Workman, Chief Executive of the ICR, said: "I'm delighted that we have once again ranked in the top five higher education institutions in the world overall on key measures of our impact among our academic peers and with industry – and that we rank even higher on the frequency with which our publications on our discoveries are cited and how effectively we work with industry.
"We punch well above our weight in these rankings, with top scores in all measures other than on absolute numbers of publications, where much larger institutions obviously have an advantage. Our high rankings provide independent validation of the world-class quality of our research, and provide clear indicators for our success in ensuring our findings benefit cancer patients through effective translation and commercialisation."
Ranking Barbara Pittam u-multirank
Scientists have uncovered a crucial change in cancer cells that allows them to spread around the body – by switching from sugar to fatty acids to fuel their growth. Find out more 
Over one-third of surviving cancer patients have received state-of-the-art targeted drug treatment or immunotherapy, reveals a new survey highlighting the 'revolution' in cancer treatment over the last decade. Find out more 
Pairing targeted drugs for breast and lung cancer could overcome treatment resistance
Targeted drugs for breast and lung cancer could be used together to overcome resistance to treatment in several different tumour types, a new study shows. Find out more 


Wildfires Can Alter Arctic Watersheds for 50 Years
Forest fires in regions of the Arctic that used to occur about every 100 years are now happening every summer
iStock Image
Climate change has contributed to the increase in the number of wildfires across the globe, especially in the Arctic where forest fires, along with increased permafrost thaw, can dramatically shift stream chemistry and potentially harm both ecosystems and humans. Researchers at the University of New Hampshire have found that some of the aftereffects of a burn, like decreased carbon and increased nitrogen, can last up to five decades and could have major implications on nearby vital waterways like the Yenisei River that drains into the Arctic Ocean, and other similar waterways around the world.
"Forest fires in this region of the Arctic used to happen about every hundred years and now we're seeing them every summer," said Bianca Rodríguez-Cardona '20G, who just received a PhD in UNH's natural resources and Earth system sciences program. "This increase in fires leads to more input of inorganic solutes into local streams, which can alter the chemistry and trigger issues like increased algae blooms and bacteria that can be harmful to humans who depend on these waterways for drinking water, fishing, and their livelihood."
In the study, recently published in the journal Nature's Scientific Reports, UNH researchers collected stream water samples in the Central Siberian Plateau in Russia during the summer months of June and July from 2016 to 2018. They compared the concentration of nutrients and dissolved organic matter in the streams and found that inorganic nitrogen, or nitrate which is a nutrient important for cell development and growth in aquatic plants, remained elevated for 10 years after a burn. And, levels of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), major sources of energy, were substantially decreased and took 50 years to return to pre-burn levels.
Boreal forests, forests that grow in high latitudes at low temperatures, have been burning with greater frequency due to longer growing seasons, warmer temperatures, and changing weather patterns adding additional uncertainty to how these ecosystems will be affected. While other studies have documented the effects of wildfires on stream chemistry, few have evaluated how these changes will impact the processing and export of nutrients from Arctic watersheds.
"Arctic rivers transfer large quantities of nutrients to the Arctic Ocean, and river water chemistry could be dramatically changed in the coming decades as permafrost thaws and wildfires become more frequent," said William McDowell, professor of environmental science and a co-author on the study. The researchers say even though responses of arctic watersheds can vary from region to region, this offers further understanding of what could happen in other areas of the Arctic, like Alaska, Canada, Norway, or Sweden.
This press release was originally published on the University of New Hampshire website.
Tags: ArcticecosystemsEnvironmentalIndustry NewsProduct Resource: Industry NewsWaterwildfires
Declines in Seed-Dispersing Animal Species Impede Plants' Ability to Adapt
Tiger Shark Migrations Altered by Climate Change, New Study Finds
New Model Examines the Effects of Toxicants on Populations in Polluted Rivers
How Circular Waste Management Systems Can Benefit the Environment
Over Half of the Plastics in Mediterranean Protected Areas Originated Elsewhere


Appreciation night draws hundreds
By MINDY KEPFIELD
Organizers of a community appreciation night in Marion's Central Park gave out more than 315 plates of pulled pork, potato salad, and chips Friday.
"We know we fed at least 315 people," organizer Roger Schroeder said. "We were really pleased with the turnout."
Many who lined up for the meals, which were donated by Carlsons' Grocery, put more than two servings on a plate to make it easier to carry, so he knows turnout was even higher.
St. Luke Hospital's food supplier provided ice cream. The appreciation night was sponsored by local businesses.
"The event itself was an effort to have something for people in our community to come and do," Schroeder said. "We have lacked that over these past 19 months because of COVID."
A dinky duck raffle, usually held during Chingawassa Days, sold $2,700 in tickets.
Schroeder estimated expenses at $900. Organizers bought prizes from 25 city merchants to boost the economy.
"We said if we did get to our goal of breaking even, we would be happy," he said. Any proceeds will go to the St. Luke Foundation.
A last-minute offer from city fire chief Killough to turn a fire truck into a giant sprinkler was a hit with children who played in the water.
It almost didn't happen, Schroeder said.
Killough tried to reach Schroeder for days with no luck because the only cell phone number the fire chief had was old.
Killough finally reached him Friday.
"I am glad he called," Schroeder said. "And I am thankful he was willing to do it."


Okotoks Town Council making it easy on the NDP
Last week the Okotoks Town Council began the process of acquiring the Wedderburn land on the north end of town across from Holy Trinity Academy and the St. James Catholic Church. They want this to be an educational, recreational and cultural facility for the community.
Fist pump.
Council has made it easy on the NDP in Alberta. In particular one man, David Eggen.
Eggen is the Minister of Education as well as the Minister of Culture and Tourism. In one decision, Council set the scene for Eggen to make his mark in our region.
10 days ago I sat in an audience listening to Eggen speak to a conference of teachers who all gave up their summer time for the teaching profession. At that conference, Eggen told us that he had "found" funding for all 232 school infrastructure projects the former PC Government had announced.
Two things on that; first I must never forget that the PCs were in the habit of announcing and never providing all in an effort to save their own political skin. The former Education Minister is a perfect example of that.
Second, missing from Eggen's announcement was how much he was banking on future generations to pay for it. He did say that the NDP were not borrowing for operations, but 232 infrastructure projects aren't operational projects, they're capital projects.
So I pulled him aside afterward (he was in a major rush to move on, but to be clear it was obvious he'd rather stay and have a depth of discussion). We had 60 seconds, but in that 60 seconds we covered a swath. The first thing he said to me was that he had to borrow through the nose to get that money.
That made the fiscal conservative in me cringe. I asked him if he really was willing to fund 232 projects that might not fit his philosophy. That peaked his attention.
"Mr. Eggen, there are school projects approved to be built outside of the communities, sometimes as far as 10 minutes outside of communities. And you just funded them."
At that he asked for an example, and I gave him the planned school near Aldersyde which is to serve Okotoks students. I told him it is in an industrial area, it has inadequate infrastructure for traffic, which will also impact the 10-minute response time the closest firehall will have. He balked at the idea, and asked me to contact him with more details. That was the first 40 seconds. The last 20 are for another blog.
So here are the details. Okotoks has no water. It can't get a commitment on water. As a result it can't develop, and that includes schools. Yet its 26,000 residents keep having babies. So the Foothills School Division starts looking. It finds space in the open arms of the M.D. of Foothills by the Legacy Fieldhouse.
This would be the third school project designed to be built outside the Okotoks community. Davisburg has two schools, one in each school division, and while it could be argued that they serve a different community, that is prime agricultural land that has been eroded to form dots of acreages all over the countryside. Further, is some instances busses are covering or expected to cover areas on the outskirts of Okotoks. Much like a crosswalk, the lines separating Okotoks from M.D. do not stop cars, and those people are just as much Okotokians as on the other side of the road.
One outlier is an anomaly. Two raises an eyebrow. Three is a trend. The trend to break up communities is beginning to show. This is a trend toward shipping students out of a community, and away from the concept of schools as community hubs. It's a trend to put so much space between neighbours that they no longer need to talk to each other. So Minister Eggen needs to either agree with this trend the PCs set for him, or stamp it out. But if he stamped it out, where would this new school go?
Here comes the Okotoks Town Council to save the day!
Not only did they find a site, but they seem to be appealing to both Eggen's portfolios. As Minister of Education, he should be thrilled there is now a site that would be basically inside town (remember, those town borders do not a blockade make). He should further be thrilled with the idea of a cultural space adjacent to it. It meets the philosophy of kids staying in the community they live in, and studying in a place that is a community hub.
So what's the problem? One minor hurdle is that the M.D. needs to agree. That should be a minor issue, but there are some political issues at play that make it a slight challenge. Another is our Wildrose MLA; will he be more interested in the fact that money is being borrowed to build this school, something that is completely anti-Wildrose, or will he see the necessity of having kids go to school in town and give Eggen a thumbs-up? My feel of the current Wildrose opposition is it's the same as the old one; opposition for opposition's sake.
Those aren't the deciding issues, though. Its whether or not Eggen has the political will to stop something he's already funded. Its whether or not Eggen is just trying to tie up the PCs loose ends, or if he intends on righting the ship. Its whether or not Eggen is willing to stand for something. Its whether or not Eggen is willing to make a stand now, because the Foothills School Division cannot wait for a school for five years. They need it now.
I'd like to think he is. But the ball isn't in my court, it's in his.
Your Alberta Party representative in Highwood wants students to go to school in their communities, and not be bussed out. Your Alberta Party representative in Highwood wants schools to be community hubs. Your Alberta Party representative is giving the Okotoks Town Council a big fist pump.
So I call on the Alberta NDP Government, namely Minister Eggen, to endorse this shift to a school community hub, and to help Okotoks get the land to make it happen and quickly. After that, perhaps Minister Eggen should review all the school projects he just funded, and where construction or the tendering process hasn't already commenced, review if they meet his philosophy of what schools should be. I'd suspect that he might find more than one that doesn't meet his standards.
While he does, he should tell us how much we're paying for it. Or rather, tell us how much the next generations will be paying for it. I won't necessarily be opposing, but I want to hear the NDP plan for making it easier for the next generations to cover the tab. So far I haven't heard it.
Oh, and I hope that while Eggen is talking about the need for this school that he also talks about why this issue came up in the first place, and help Okotoks get a commitment for the Water For Life program.
Kudos to the Okotoks Town Council for their progressive thinking. It's time for everyone to get back to building community.
Are Alberta voters thick? I hope not.
It perplexes me that a pumpkin in the place of popular Premier Prentice piques people. Perhaps the public has a pinhole perspective on political participation.
I worked on that all day.
So skip the alliteration - I really am baffled when people show indignation at the leader of the PC Party of Alberta not showing up to a forum. They have no good reason to show surprise and disappointment.
This is the norm for the Mr. Prentice. Voters should have seen it coming.
In August of 2014, he was invited to the Alberta Teachers' Association's Summer Conference. He didn't show, despite a carrot being offered to get him there. Thomas Lukaszuk got the stage, and Ric McIver at least made a token appearance. Granted, there was no pumpkin there that time.
Prentice's reward: the Premiership of Alberta.
What else could he have possibly learned? He certainly didn't learn that if you don't show up, you don't get elected. He learned that if he stayed away, he would get elected. So he did.
And a pumpkin took his place. I'll bet that pumpkin doesn't get elected.
Maybe he thought the pumpkin would represent him well at a forum sponsored by the Alberta Society for the Visually Impaired.
Prentice was given affirmation of that lesson learned during the PC leadership election itself. He was elected with less than half the votes cast in the 2011 leadership race, and less than one-sixth of the votes on the second ballot in 2006. Therefore he learned that if voters don't show up, he gets elected.
So what better way to get into office than to disappoint voters to the point of apathy?
He's counting on voters being thick. He might be right.
I can only guess that the indignation I see on social media suggests voters didn't see it coming, that they fully expected Prentice to show up.
Mind you, if voters really are thick, it's probably because they keep building up the callus from banging their heads against the wall.
I have hope that voters aren't that thick, though. After all, they were prepared enough for an absent Premier that they had a pumpkin ready to take his place.
So voters, if you aren't thick, then you shouldn't be surprised. And should he be elected, you shouldn't be surprised if he doesn't show up to Question Period and lets his Deputy Premier field the tough questions for him.
Sound familiar? The only thing missing from this prediction is the margarita in Palm Springs.
And, voters, if you aren't thick, then you'll understand why an absent Premier is not a good thing. And you'll vote for someone who shows up.
So who showed up ready to listen to the constituents at the Calgary Foothills forum?
Jennifer Burgess – NDP.
Polly Knowlton Cockett – Green Party.
Michelle Glavine - Alberta Party.
Kathy Macdonald - Wildrose Party.
Robert Prcic – Liberal Party.
I know who I'm partial to, but the point I'm trying to get across is that voters should not let themselves appear as thick; they should be well-informed, and make the best decision for themselves going forward. So check these candidates out.
I will push one bias though. I'd rather voters vote for a person, not a pumpkin.
High River is NOT recovered. Too many golf courses in the way.
There has been a great deal of good news coming from High River. Our presence has never been more noticeable at the Calgary Stampede, what with our float getting so much coverage and awards, and a chuckwagon with our logo on the side running every night. Shortly a book will be released sharing some of the stories of the flood; stories of immense challenge balanced with unyielding persistence and survival.
If that were only the way it really was. For many High Riverites, the nightmare doesn't ever end.
Recall Richard Murray, given full approval to remediate his basement, only to have that approval swiped away from him after he sunk every last dollar he had into it. With three separate Associate Ministers managing the portfolio, all answering to three different Municipal Affairs Ministers in the past year, it's no wonder the DRP changed multiple times. The process stole his home from him as a result, and now he is no longer a resident of Alberta.
Introducing Jim Morgan, owner of a small business in High River, and a passionate High Riverite. His Facebook and Twitter feeds are a treasure trove of one-liners and insightful knee-slappers mixed with musings about the awesomeness in High River. He is known for his positivity.
Except when the Disaster Recovery Program, the system whose primary purpose was to help people get back to what they once were, offered him $702 to cover the costs of all things lost in his business. They demanded 350 photos, reams of itemized lists of things lost, and even 3 years of business statements, only to tell him that they were covering half of the labour for cleaning his business. Why only half? Because DRP expects insurance to cover the rest. Morgan is being shirked by insurance as well. Again, as I have asked for from the very beginning, where is the event-specific ombudsman that would have negotiated these nebulous lines?
Introducing D and L, High River residents who have not spent a single night at home for 13 months. Their full names are not shared because they don't want anything jeopardizing their work with the DRP. DRP is not offering them even a fraction of the cost to remediate their homes, because they determine whether or not the home is in flood fringe or floodway based on the elevation of their front door - not their walkout basement. Their walkout basement is clearly in floodway (and as Jim Morgan explained in the Facebook post listed above, that should never have been allowed to happen, but because it did, Government now needs to deal with it), yet this tiny piece of fine print the DRP has arbitrarily decided to create is preventing the Sundby's from affording to live at home. They hold out, hoping to move back to the town they love soon.
Interestingly, the government is still using outdated maps for determining where floodplains are. Observe the two maps below. The first was the one I demonstrated shortly after the flood as grotesquely out of date.
The second is what is currently posted by Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. The changes are only in roadways and town boundaries. When we asked for updated flood maps, we didn't ask for something Google could produce for us; the floodplains were supposed to be updated long ago and they haven't been.
By the way, if you are a Cardston resident or business owner who got flooded this year, do everything possible to get your recovery assistance to ignore flood maps, because your maps are horribly inaccurate as well.
If it's not changing leadership, confusion with insurance, or maps, what other reasons could there be for people to be denied DRP funding? Introducing Chuck Shifflett, High River luthier. As a single example in his saga with DRP, he was told that his heritage home needed to have the foundation completely fixed, and to mitigate against future floods they even raised it two feet. Then DRP chose not to reimburse him for his foresight or care for parts of our heritage. The reason: the house is too old.
If these four people were in the buyout territories known as floodway, they would have cost taxpayers approximately $1.5 million. They aren't looking for buyouts, so really their combined costs are actually half that, if not even lower. Still sounds like a lot, right? So if the government is saving that money by not giving it to the homeless and businessless, where is all this money going?
To golf courses. $18 million that will fix a golf course that will likely be damaged again in the next high rainfall event.
They say it is to help encourage the tourist economy in that area of the province. What they didn't divulge is the link to another Progressive Conservative party sole-sourced contract to PC friends.
But let's look passed that little nugget for a moment and consider the 150 jobs lost when the golf course closed, and the 51,000 rounds of golf Albertans play there each year.
I guess the 120 people still living in Saddlebrook, homeless, and with no certain resolution on their homes is less than 150 jobs.
I guess the many businesses, like Morgan's, that have to close up shop, or the dozen businesses that will be left homeless when their temporary structures get torn down this summer (their original locations are still under heavy construction or in lease agreement disputes) is less than 150 jobs.
I guess rounds of golf are more important than people.
If each damaged home in High River cost $200,000 to remediate (not an unrealistic number), that $18 million would fix 90 homes. So I ask you, 600 rounds of golf, or a place for a family to sleep?
This argument, however, ignores a problem the government is having to deal with; inappropriate developments in inappropriate places. Homes are built in floodplains. Thankfully the local government is trying to deal with this by undeveloping certain areas. It might be wildly unfair to people who purchased those places hoping to stay until their mandatory relocation to Heaven, but hopefully even they understand that those developments are costing taxpayers year after year. However, in saying this, people in these areas, like Jamie Kinghorn, need to be compensated for the loss of their homes due to undevelopment (and any money they unwittingly spent fixing them prior to the undevelopment announcement).
But a golf course with links to the PC party is too important to relegate to undevelopment.
All development in the foothills causes problems in the watershed. In a natural state, the water gets slowed down, spread out in the groundwater, and doesn't gather anywhere near as much in rivers to cause high water events.
When development occurs, it packs down the ground, making it so that water doesn't seep, spread out and slow down. Rather it gathers in gutters, ditches, and eventually rivers, and causes high water events.
But don't you dare suggest undevelopment when it comes to a golf course. High River homeowners can be shunted to ... well, wherever, but PCs need to make sure Albertans get their 36 holes in.
How many of those golfers at this golf course were High Riverites, I wonder.
Please don't fall into the trap of thinking High River is on the road to recovery. It's not. It's not even on a paved secondary highway getting there yet. There are too many golf courses in the way.
The Alberta Party has a plan for the following things that would be of interest particularly to flood victims still dealing with DRP;
A transparent DRP appeals process that includes in-person interviews (not just a closed-door paper appeal)
A strong plan for updating floodplain maps
An elimination of the flawed buyout programs, and reallocation of those moneys to help people rebuild
Long-term mitigation measures
Better development planning that considers flood control
Better province-wide emergency planning and warning systems
Working with the insurance industry to develop overland flood coverage
Increasing funds available for all this by offering Alberta Flood Bonds
This is just a smattering of how the Alberta Party views proper management of the disaster recovery, and all of these measures can still be put into place after the PC government is gone.
Can't see the forest for the floodwaters
We've lost focus. We are talking about the wrong things.
Don't get me wrong, the things we are talking about need to be discussed. Raj Sherman is exactly right asking about how contracts are being distributed. Danielle Smith is exactly right to call for a public inquiry. The PCs are right to get started on mapping and mitigations, they just don't know how to do it.
None of this matters to many Albertans right now.
We must focus on the disaster at hand, and get the recovery taken care of. The PCs aren't getting that job done, but they are right to focus on it.
There are still hundreds of people, maybe thousands, who have no idea where their insurance coverage stops and the Disaster Recovery Program starts. This is not specifically a High River problem, even though they dominate the news. There are people in Exshaw, Bragg Creek, Medicine Hat, Black Diamond and Calgary still in limbo waiting for answers from their insurance company. Companies are not necessarily at fault; they are trying to protect their bottom line, and they do so by saying "the Disaster Recovery Program will cover that for you". But the job of the government is to protect their citizens, and they aren't doing it.
There are still hundreds of people who also have no place to live. Again, this is not specifically a High River problem, although most of the people in this boat live there. However, there are those who live in Exshaw, Bragg Creek, Medicine Hat and Black Diamond who, because they weren't in the floodplain but were rather in the flood fringe or no zone at all, are unable to relocate. Some of those people are unable to build on the former site because, as could be expected with flood waters, the ground their home used to be on is now very far downstream. Soil contamination is preventing homeowners from returning.
An exemplar; George Lane Park, a beautiful park and campground in downtown High River and just on the flip side of a berm from the river, was heavily flooded; at least 6 inches of silt covered the land. Today, grass grows through the silt.
However, if you drive through the northeast end of the town, almost 60 days after the flood, no grass grows. Not even a weed.
You cannot rebuild a home where grass won't even grow, and expect families to let their kids play there.
The Town of High River's Downtown Core is nothing but empty shell after empty shell. If small business doesn't come back right away, there won't be a reason to rebuild High River.
Residents across southern Alberta know they need help transferring from insurance coverage to Disaster Recovery Funding, and many also know they need help determining how to live anywhere when they can't rebuild where they are. And all they are hearing from opposition parties is stuff they couldn't care less about ... yet.
So congratulations PCs, you are focusing on the right thing. However, that's where my congratulations stops.
It's in their best interests to do what they refuse to.
Under the leadership of Doug Griffiths (not Alison Redford, she has been woefully silent on everything), we have seen flood victims treated like children under his "father knows best" mentality.
At a meeting in High River, Griffiths' numerous "I know how you feel" statements showed he knows anything but how High Riverites feel.
When the official Disaster Recovery Program email is shown to have an autoresponder that says "we will not respond to your email" and is admonished for it, Griffiths responds with "It was fixed already. Try to keep up". Yes father, I will understand that even though you did wrong, I should not expect an apology, but rather will be scolded like a child.
My favorite Griffiths quote (insert sarcastic tone here): "taxpayers cannot be on the hook just because you're scared." I now understand that being scared precludes me from being a taxpayer, thanks for the education, Mr. Griffiths.
The problem is that when Griffiths sees a gymnasium stuffed to the point of being called an illegal assembly full of people who are trying to tell him his government is not doing enough, he patronizes them instead of coming up with solutions.
The solutions are easy. They are in the best interests of PCs, just to get the mob to be quiet, if not to actually help them.
Fund an ombudsman who will help individuals with their insurance, and once they're insurance is completed, have that same ombudsman guide them into the Disaster Recovery Process. The sooner people get into the DRP system, the less Mr. Griffiths will have to hear gripe from flood victims because, get this, he has actually helped them.
The only reason the government would not do this is because of the fear of the cost of paying these ombudsmen. I suggest spending a comparatively small amount on the salaries of these ombudsmen, as it will almost definitely save the DRP administrative costs, and will streamline the process, making it more cost effective and efficient.
Adjust the Disaster Recovery Program criteria to help those where rebuilding is simply not an option. Griffiths has already explained that each DRP claim will be treated on an individual basis. Why not just tell these people that if rebuilding is not an option, steps will be taken to either make it an option, or to relocate. Then Mr. Griffiths will not have to hear gripe from these flood victims because, get this, he has actually helped them.
The only reason the government won't do this is because they are afraid that once they start relocating even just one resident, they've set a precedent. It's a more dangerous precedent to make residents feel as though they have no choice but to walk away from everything they've worked for. Once you do that, the government is going to need to start increasing funding for homeless shelters, because that's where all these flood victims will end up.
Do whatever it takes to get small and mid-sized businesses back in their buildings. Intervene on rental/landlord disputes for a temporary time, and get the repair process expedited in business-places immediately. Help retail outlets purchase stock right away, they are already passed the point of ordering for Christmas. Do what it takes.
The only reason the government hasn't done this, as Doug Griffiths has explained, is that they are still focused on residents, and they'll get to businesses later. Not good enough. No business means no residents. He of all people should know this.
It has become obvious that fatherly Doug Griffiths will not listen to the children. He can't see the forest for the floodwaters.
It also became obvious long ago that the Associate Ministers in charge of Recovery and Reconstruction are not in the position to make these decisions, being relegated by the father to the back of the room or even further outside the hall, as was the case with Rick Fraser in High River last week.
So where is the leader of our province in all this? Nowhere. She doesn't run this province. Even when she said "we will return all to what it once was", the rest of her caucus isn't following through with it. She is not leading. Such a shame that she isn't even willing to consider what her late mother's neighbours are suggesting. Even her constituents in Calgary-Elbow can't get in touch with her. I wonder if the PCs will be willing to allow a non-leader to allow the caucus to continue to run amok?
I hope she steps up to the plate. She needs to show up to her own party. But she needs to do it now, because we're starting to lose focus on the needs of right now.
Cracks in the foundation: Sacrificed High River residents told they are on their own
Through the Associate Minister Responsible for Regional Recovery and Reconstruction in High River Rick Fraser, I've been pressing for details on what's next for Albertans affected by the flood. Sunday, 38 days after the flood, most answers came.
Yet today, 40 days after the flood, there are still High River residents falling through the cracks in the foundation.
Refer to my letter to Fraser identifying the details Albertans needed. The only question remaining completely outstanding is that of the Disaster Recover Program Loophole. If the Disaster Recovery Program is the foundation upon which we "rebuild Alberta", then residents in the Hamptons of High River (and a few in other areas) are falling through the cracks in that foundation.
Hamptons residents are not in a flood plain or fringe zone. Therefore, according to the Disaster Recovery Program, if they want to be able to get help from the Government in the event of a future flood, they have to floodproof. And let's face it, where the water has gone, the water will go again.
This assumes, of course, that the Hamptons residents CAN stay, and therefore can choose to floodproof or not. It provides nothing for them if they CAN'T stay.
While everyone else was already allowed back in, people in the Hamptons and one area of Sunrise were given an escort into their homes, and 15 minutes maximum to collect their most precious things. Two days later, they were allowed back in.
I was there helping out a friend of mine. The stench of the entire community was sickening. I drive a Honda Fit, a car that can park in those tiny spots that nobody else considers in the parking lot, and there was so much activity I couldn't even drive through. People had obviously been waiting for this moment, and every helper and volunteer they could get was there.
Residents could see it; the reason it took so long to get them home. It is a massive berm that runs along 2nd Avenue. Certainly creating that berm in the middle of Lake Hampton would have been no small feat. But creating that berm meant everyone south of it could have the Lake pumped out, and everyone north of it, including the Hamptons and one area of Sunrise, would be sacrificed. Water out of the south end would be pumped into the backyards, basements, and sewage systems of the Hamptons. While the flood caused the water to be there, the extent of the damage was due to being bermed in; a man-made solution.
For interest's sake, those who made decisions during the emergency phase never admitted to sacrificing the Hamptons. In fact, they never received that admission until last Friday, 37 days after the flood, 34 days after the decision to sacrifice, and only in a very closed-door meeting (which I was invited to, but not allowed in because I was not a resident of a small area known as Hamptons Commons).
Ask almost any resident in the Hamptons and Sunrise, and they'll tell you they understand the need to be sacrificed. They are the few, and the Central and Southeast areas of High River was the many. In fact, some residents will even tell you they were proud to have their homes selected for sacrifice to save the town they love.
Approximately 48-hour of straight labour with that berm looming over them later, Alberta Health Services came around and told people to leave their homes, labelling them "Not Fit for Human Habitation", whether it be for structural or mould problems. Many AHS assessors didn't even come in the front door, unless they were forced to do so by a contractor working on their clients behalf. The vast majority of those who got the NFH designation were never told what to do or what to expect next.
Nobody has told the Hamptons residents why it took so long, although they have figured it out for themselves. Nobody had told them what the next step was, except to sign up for a Disaster Recovery Program whose criteria never applied to them. None of the litany of assessors that have been around are giving any details as to what needs to be done next.
One resident gets frustrated enough to bring in his own structural engineer. The recommendation by that independent engineer was to bulldoze.
Another resident gets frustrated enough to bring in his own mould specialist. This specialist explains that he had seen marijuana grow ops in better shape than this Hamptons house, and they were bulldozed.
A resident of Sunrise, a very well-respected landscaper, explains that to get rid of the soil contamination from sewage, chemicals left in garages that will have spilled into the Lake, and other leaching effects, they may need to strip the entire community down to the clay. One look at the vegetative death in the community that has shown no signs of recovery weeks after Lake Hampton was gone, and its hard to not agree with him.
The residents are getting a pretty good picture of what's going to happen. They can't afford to raise their families or live in a home with structural problems, mould contaminating both the inside and outside, and sewage-ridden soil. They can't afford to stay. There is no choice for them, they must move. And that leaves their neighbours who think they might be able to stay wonder why they'd stay in a community with no community. Finally the phrase "property values" is mentioned. And as the Disaster Recovery Program is announced, they also realize that their situation is exacerbated by the fact the criteria don't even fit them.
Take a peek at these photos. The photography is beautiful, the subject material is spirit-breaking. This is a typical Hamptons home. This is a typical sacrificial lamb.
And the foundation for "rebuilding Alberta", the Disaster Recovery Program, is telling these people they must stay. There is no coverage for stripping the soil to the clay. There is no amount of remediation that could correct both the structures and the mould. Even a rebuild is not an option.
In prances Tervita, fresh off a $45 million contract with the Province of Alberta, here to save the day. Even though they just finished refurbishing the Saddledome in Calgary, they haven't got enough employees to do the job, so they hold a job fair to hire High Riverites. They're ONLY mandate; remediate.
Hamptons residents are told to register with Tervita (after already having had to register with Red Cross, Emergency Operations Centres, the Volunteer Centre, their Insurance Companies, and Alberta Health Services). They're told within 24 hours they'll get a call, and within 48 hours of that an assessor will come out. Nope and nope. 9 days after Tervita was awarded the contract, the Hamptons still looked as if Tervita had only been around for a day. It was still deserted.
It's an eery feeling driving through that neighbourhood that just a week ago had so much activity I couldn't drive my subcompact car through it.
The homeowners expect to see seasoned experts come and assess, and so are surprised when they find the assessors coming are much younger than they. One pair of assessors go in saying it will take them about 90 minutes, and come out 19 minutes later with puffy eyes and shortness of breath.
On Friday, July 26 at 1 PM, Tervita met with some of the Hamptons owners. They were given a sheet of paper with a fill-in-the-blank statement giving the Queen, the Town of High River and Tervita access to their homes and to strip whatever they decided they needed to strip. No letterhead, and no other paperwork indicating what assessments had been done to show work was even required. Residents asked what was going to be stripped. Residents asked what chemicals would be used to deal with mould. Residents asked who the engineer was in charge of the job. No answers came. So the residents didn't sign.
I wouldn't have signed either. It sounds almost like an unsavoury car mechanic trying to convince me that it cost $200 to put a plug in a door panel.
Then the proverbial gun-to-the-head: those residents who said they wouldn't sign were immediately told that if they didn't, the Government wouldn't help them, and they were on their own.
A meeting with Danielle Smith, and she gathers many notes and starts pounding the pavement with insurance providers who are still giving residents the run-around, pressing for the Government to reconsider their stance on the Hamptons in light of the fact they were sacrificed, and keeping track of the charlatan contractors that come around.
Smith, for her part, has done very well by the Hamptons. But even she, at that meeting, admitted there was only so much she could do.
So, indeed, as promised by Tervita, the Hamptons residents are on their own. This is why you saw them at a protest in front of Alison Redford's office in Calgary. They had no problem going, as they have no home to work on, and for many of them their businesses are also on standby due to the flood.
Work through the Governments formula for Disaster Recovery Funding, and you'll find that the average Hamptons home would cost only $10,000 less to rebuild than it would to simply buy them out. And that doesn't even include the soil, loss of property value, and the fact that the community will be, as a colleague of mine stated, a "Swiss Cheese" community. All value, either financial, physical or community-based, is gone in the Hamptons, and the owners know it was because they were sacrificed.
Don't you think that they deserve a bit better than 40 days with only half-measures and no answers?
More follow-up on the questions I posed to Fraser.
On July 18, 2013 there was a Flood Information Night that left many scratching their heads. I posted some questions as a summary of what we needed to know. The status of those questions is as follows;
Flood Maps - A flood mitigation panel has been set up, one that is supposed to solicit the experience of everyday Albertans who go through floods on a regular basis. Contact information for them is outstanding, as is a timeline for when to expect the maps to be updated by.
Insurance Complaints - Detailed procedures for how to manage this have been documented, and Danielle Smith in particular has been working hard on this, but in many cases complaints still arise. It is for this reason, as well as the confusion behind the purpose Tervita has in High River and the Disaster Recover Program, that I have called on Premier Redford for employ an "Event-Specific Ombudsman". With a person in that role, those with continuing challenges of various sorts with their coverage can have those challenges fixed faster, and therefore they can get back home faster.
Disaster Recovery Funding Timeline - Not provided, although details on the formula for coverage has been released.
Mortgages - The Government has asked for all renewal and foreclosure activity to stop for the time being. Also, the Government has started to institute the Floodway Designations on the Land Titles for those who have been affected. This recommendation came from the 2006 Flood Report. The jury is still out as to whether or not that will protect homeowners from issues in the real estate market, or make it harder for them to sell. In many cases, I think protection is what it will achieve.
Floodproofing Standards - The Government, yesterday, released the details every Albertan needs to figure out how to prepare their homes best. They call them the "Minimum Individual Flood Mitigation Measures". I call them Floodproofing Standards. Either way, details on what floodproofing looks like have been announced, and this is good news for everyone.
It's time the Alberta Government helps out with Insurance
The floods in late June of 2013 were unlike anything our province has every experienced before. It should come as no surprise that challenges and conflict arise when our livelihoods are at risk. The most recent communication between residents of High River and Heather Mack, Director of Government Relations with the Insurance Bureau of Canada, received from @okotoksNow is a great example of one set of challenges that we must face.
Insurance Providers are expected to be, in the common vernacular, "the good guys". We rely upon our Insurance Provider in times when we need it most, and we expect them to come and "save the day". When this doesn't happen, it is no surprise we leave the interaction very wounded.
It is obvious from this communication and the nature of the forum at the Flood Information Night on July 18, 2013, and many other meetings I've had since across Southern Alberta, that there are some very wounded people as a result of confusion with regards to insurance. There is a lot of uncertainty as to what is supposed to be covered, what impact independent adjusters have, why some receive coverage and others don't, what procedures are appropriate for adjusting a claim, and other issues of communication.
The Alberta Party endeavours to focus on common sense solutions, and believes it can govern this way. One such solution that would best serve Albertans is to appoint an independent Event-Specific Ombudsman, paid for through the Disaster Recovery Program, selected by the Superintendent of Insurance in Alberta, and given a strict set of parameters in their job description. Those parameters would include meeting with those who experience confusion with their insurance policies and helping to educate those individuals as to what their policies cover; assisting individuals in claims appeals processes where necessary; educating and advising individuals as to what the next steps should be once the claim process has been completed (whether covered or not) including Disaster Recovery Program applications.
Individuals with insurance questions remain in limbo. Any effort the Alberta Government makes in helping individuals through the insurance process and into the Disaster Recovery Program processes means less limbo for residents. It also means less overall cost on the Disaster Recovery Program; the sooner residents receive the assistance they need, the less cost they will need to incur to return to normal. The cost of employing an Event-Specific Ombudsman would easily be made up in the savings in reconstruction, should that reconstruction happen sooner rather than later when the destruction is even worse. It only makes sense to help this process get completed quickly.
Certainly changes to the Insurance industry is not a common sense solution. While competition within the industry is one reason why there are such varied issues, it is also a way of ensuring the best services are available to Albertans. An insurance company who treats its clients poorly and does not make appropriate coverage affordable will not likely be retained following this flood. What is needed, therefore, is a method of speeding the recovery process.
Flood victims need to get through this recovery process quickly. Their livelihood and Alberta's economy depends upon it. It is easily seen in the best interests of residents, Insurance Providers and the Province to go through these processes quickly and efficiently. The Alberta Government is in the perfect position to make this happen.
As a member of the Alberta Party in the Highwood constituency, I have written this letter to our Premier, the Honourable Alison Redford, asking her to work with the Insurance Industry by funding the appointment of an Event-Specific Ombudsman to effectively complete the insurance claim process for those affected by the flood. This will help the Alberta Government show to Albertans how much they truly value rebuilding Alberta after the flood.
Flood Mitigation Panel needed, but not yet
I'll give the Alberta Government credit for being forward thinking. However, they are leaving a lot of Albertans behind in the present while they focus on the future.
This is not unusual, as our province is dealing with chronic symptoms of this approach. There are homeless people being left behind, mentally ill not being cared for, and senior citizens being ignored. As many of us have heard before, the quality of a society is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable. Today's example of vulnerable Albertans being left behind are those still trying to get back into their homes after the 2013 flood, 32 days later.
This past weekend, the Government of Alberta announced a volunteer panel of experts in flood mitigation who would work to come upon solutions for the future. Their intent is to take into account the knowledge, experience, and opinion of everyday Albertans. This is a fantastic concept, and I'll congratulate the Alberta Government on this project, as it is necessary for us to move forward.
However, the Government is missing out on one key thing; flood mitigation does not matter in the slightest in the minds of Albertans who can't even get into their homes as a result of this flood.
I thought the Government already set themselves out a framework of priorities for response to this flood. It seems they forgot them already.
For many Albertans in High River, the Siksika Nation, Exshaw and Calgary (among other places, I'm sure), they are still in the "Stabilization" phase of that framework; some could even argue they are still in the "Response" phase. This panel is only applicable to the "Intermediate Recovery", arguably the "Long Term Recovery" phases.
Yes we need to discuss how to prevent this from happening again to the best of our ability. But not at the expense of those who are waiting to be helped back into their homes right now.
These people need answers to questions of what they should do now. These questions aren't "what should we do in the future to prevent this?" These questions are "what do I need to do to be able to go home?"
A lady at a Flood Information Night in High River called the residents who haven't gotten home yet the "sacrificial lambs". Announcing a flood mitigation panel is not likely to change that viewpoint.
Please share this Open Letter addressed to Rick Fraser. These are the questions we need answers to immediately, before anybody should care about flood mitigation for the future.
Open Letter to Rick Fraser: Looking for Details
Click here to see the original letter and document.
Attention: The Honourable Rick Fraser, Associate Minister of Recovery and Reconstruction for High River
Dear Associate Minister,
I write to offer you the opportunity to directly respond in an open format to questions and concerns expressed by victims of the most recent 2013 Alberta Floods. It is in Albertans' best interests to have open, clear and concise communication about the needs of Albertans, and the Government's efforts to fulfill them. I intend on being a partner with you in the development of this communication.
In particular, the questions and concerns I refer to are many of those expressed at the Flood Information evening in High River on July 18, 2013, a meeting that left the vast majority of those attending dissatisfied with a lack of details. While the five gentlemen at the forum-styled information session answered questions to the best of their ability, they simply were not equipped to provide the details that High River residents were expecting, and that many other Albertans will also be expecting at their own Flood Information nights.
This has led to a great deal of frustration, and the level of discourse between residents and officials is dwindling rapidly as a result. I am hoping that through this letter we can retain a high level of discourse, and yet provide the details Albertans need, want and expect.
I am writing in this open format as many were unable to attend the meeting for a variety of reasons, and should have access to the content of the discussions, just as much as they should have access to the detailed responses. I believe this to be a perfect opportunity for you to connect more directly with the concerns expressed by residents, and therefore improve the level of communication with your open responses.
The format of the questions attached provide synopses of those expressed at the July 18 Information Night, the answers provided that same night, and the remaining detail High River residents in particular are looking for. It is my hope, as a partner in communication, you respond in a similarly open fashion. Should you do so, I would be very happy to share as publicly as possible on your behalf the responses you provide.
It should be noted that none of the questions attached refer to how the flood was managed, although it was a significant theme brought forward by High River residents during that Information Night. That would be a topic that should be assigned to an independent inquiry following the Stabilization phase of the Provincial Recovery Framework publicized earlier today. All questions below apply directly to the current stage of that Framework, the Stabilization phase.
I know you share with me a desire to help Albertans move forward following this flood. I hope you share with me a desire for improved communications, and therefore can work with me as a partner in informing Albertans with the details they need. Albertans have shown great resiliency through working in concert with each other, and I hope that working as partners in communication, we can continue that collaboration to the benefit of all Albertans.
Joel Windsor,
High River Resident
CC: The Honourable Alison Redford, Premier of Alberta
Ms. Danielle Smith, M.L.A. for HighwoodThe Honourable Doug Horner, President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Finance
The Honourable Doug Griffiths, Minister of Municipal Affairs
The Honourable Diana McQueen, Minister of Environment and Sustainable Resource Development
His Worship Emile Blokland, Mayor of the Town of High River
Mr. William Munsey, President of the Alberta Party
Citizens of the Province of Alberta
Encl.
Question: Regarding Flood Maps - It is obvious, particularly to High River residents, the current flood maps were out-of-date prior to the flood, are now even moreso as a result of changes to the terrain due to the flood, and in some cases inaccurate as residents expressed a history of flooding even though their property is not in any designated flood zone. Residents not only want to know their status regarding potential future Disaster Recovery Funding but also the general safety and flood-mitigative needs of their houses regardless of the occurence of disasters. We recognize that no map can necessarily be perfectly accurate, but the extent to which the inaccuracies exist is causing undue pressure on residents. What is the timeline for the updating of these maps?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013 was inconclusive, however the need for updating the maps was recognized.
Associate Minister, can you please provide a commitment to a timeline for the updating of these maps so Albertans can make informed decisions about the future of their homes?
Question: Regarding Insurance Complaints - One representative at the Flood Information Evening explained that many houses were affected by sewage as high as the second level of their houses due to the pressure the floodwaters placed on the sewage system. Some insurance companies refuse to cover damage at those levels of the houses stating "sewage that high is not possible." This is simply one example of the many disputes residents are having with their insurance providers. If there is a dispute between a resident and their insurance company, what recourse does the resident have?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013: Hire a lawyer.
Follow-Up Question: If the insurance company is found to be at fault, will the Disaster Recovery Program cover those legal costs?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013: No.
Recommendation provided by a representative from the Insurance Bureau of Canada via a Tele-Town Hall hosted by Danielle Smith, M.L.A. for Highwood: For any grievance, complaint or even minor inconvenience, consumers are asked to call the Insurance Bureau of Canada at 1-800-377-6378.
Associate Minister, can you please commit to collaborating with the Insurance Bureau of Canada to ensure not only are insurance contracts appropriately adhered to, but that consumers are protected from insurance companies who downplay the damage caused by the effects of the flood?
Question: Regarding Disaster Recovery Funding Timeline - Residents are ready to remediate their houses now. These residents, however, have no financial means to procure the professional services to do so. How long will residents need to wait before they have the various resources, including financial, to begin the remediation process?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013 was inconclusive, as responses are likely on a case-by-case basis, and require the presence of assessors prior to allocation of funds.
Associate Minister, in order to begin the remediation process immediately, can you please make funds available to residents immediately, understanding that residents will be responsible for costs over and above what is allocated to them through the Disaster Recovery Program? If not, can you offer another solution that will expediate the process of getting funds to residents so they can remediate their homes sooner?
Question: Regarding Mortgages - Many residents are at the season where they need to renegotiate their mortgages. Some of these residents are uncertain as to the future of their homes, and therefore do not know the next step in the mortgage-renegotiation process. What course of action should these residents take?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013 was inconclusive, as the panel recognized they did not have the skillset to answer the question.
Associate Minister, can you and the Alberta Government advocate on behalf of residents to the various financial institutions to temporarily stay all mortgage activity of those who are eligible for Disaster Recovery Funding so that residents can focus on making the best decisions for themselves and their property which those financial institutions have a stake in? If not, can you ensure that Disaster Recovery Funding will also cover the costs of not renegotiating mortgages in a timely fashion?
Question: Regarding Disaster Recovery Program Loophole - For residents living in Flood Fringe or Overland Water Flow zones (according to current maps) as well as residents who were not in any designated Flood zone, yet were devastated by these most recent floods, many of them are no longer in the physical, mental and/or financial position to remain in the same premises. Some of these homes have been condemned, and therefore residents have no choice available to them but to relocate. According to the summary flowchart provided by the Disaster Recovery Program, residents in these zones are only provided assistance if they chose to remain. For residents who, due to condemned houses, health-related inability or significant financial malady are incapable of choosing to remain and have a need to relocate due to the devastating impacts of this flood, what Disaster Recovery Funding is available to them?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013: None.
Associate Minister, please recognize that the criteria for Disaster Recovery Funding for individuals in Flood Fringe zones assumes residents have a choice. Can you please adjust the criteria to also provide assistance to those residents who, for their own individual circumstances, have no choice remaining, and must relocate?
Question: Regarding Floodproofing Standards - Many residents expected that with an announcement that the Government of Alberta would only provide future disaster funding in the event of another flood if homes were appropriately mitigated, that the announcement would be followed presently by a description of those floodproofing standards. They expected at the July 18, 2013 meeting to be told what those standards are. High River residents are very resourceful and well-experienced in flood recovery, so knowing those standards would have undoubtedly assisted residents in speeding up the recovery process. What are those floodproofing standards?
Answer provided on July 18, 2013 was that those standards are as of yet unidentified, but are likely to differ on a case-by-case basis.
Associate Minister, standards are benchmarks that all Albertans can be expected to adhere to, should not differ on a case-by-case basis, and through their very existence can help speed up the recovery process. Can you commit to providing at the very least guidelines, or preferably a document detailing floodproofing standards that can be applied across the province, and when can Albertans expect those documents to be made publicly available?
No new Flood Maps for Alberta
Doug Griffiths made an announcement that put some people in a tizzy this past week. Some claimed it was insensitive to High Riverites, although I disagree. It's the detail this announcement was missing.
Monday night, people came in droves to the High River Expo at Highwood High School. They left more confused than ever.
I went with one question in mind, the one question that must be answered before anything can be detailed with this new flood-disaster funding policy. How long should we expect to wait until we have updated flood maps that take into account the changes in terrain from this most recent flood?
I first went to the Disaster Recovery Plan booth. They told me to talk to the people at the Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (ESRD) booth. I went there, and asked the same question.
They told me there was no need.
The floodway maps they are currently distributing, and the floodway maps that are on their oh-so-special app on their website are based on regular flood occurences, not the once-a-century floods, and so they should remain accurate.
I call Taurus Excrement.
I asked what would prompt them to start the process of remapping. They said they'd have to be there physically to reassess and see a potential need. I told them I'd save them that step and explain the need to them right now.
Examine the below diagram from ESRD's floodplains map. Running north and south down the center, near the bottom, is a line that seems to divide light red from yellow, meaning it divides flood fringe from no-risk land.
That line is a railroad track berm. Or at least it was.
Observe what remains of that berm.
The representative from the ESRD seemed to understand there may be a need, although somewhat grudgingly. I then asked what the next step would be.
She explained ESRD would need to consult with all the stakeholders, including the railroad company, the town and the province, to see if there was any intent to replace and repair that berm. They'd also have to wait until the municipality asked them to upgrade the flood maps.
And then ...?
And then they'll start the process of updating the maps.
A process before the request process to get a process started. In my mind, not acceptable.
Canadian Pacific Railway owns that track, and hasn't used it for at least 4 years. I'd be surprised if they have any interest in rebuilding it. I won't speak for the town, but I would suggest that they will take quite some time before they start discussing rezoning and building berms, as they have a bit more on their plate right now.
So I translate this to mean months of bureaucracy.
I know this to be the norm for our PC government, but I was hoping for a more common sense approach to our need during this abnormal time.
Here's the deal: if people in Alberta do not know where those flood plains
actually are (not just where some out-of-date map says they are), how can we protect our homes? Nowhere in Alberta is this more frustrating on such a mass scale as in High River.
This isn't just about whether or not we will get Disaster Relief in the future. This is about whether or not our homes and businesses are at risk in the first place. Nobody will build in High River if they can't even be assured of where the floodplains are.
We need to have these maps updated not now, not months from now, but on Sunday, the same day Minister Griffiths made his policy announcement.
Thankfully, Rick Fraser, Associate Minister for the Recovery of High River, was two booths away. So I pulled him aside and asked him about this process before the request process to get the process started. After about 5 minutes of listening to a few talking points, I pulled out my tablet showing him the map above, and he finally clued in. His response; "they will get going on this if I have anything to say about it."
Alright, one small step for one small man, I thought. But just in case, I went to Danielle Smith, my MLA, who was also right beside us. I explained the exact same thing to her.
She shared my sentiment. She said she had heard similar concerns before, although she had not yet heard what ESRD's triple-stage process was like. I told her I spoke to Mr. Fraser. She said "let's wait a couple of days, and be optimistic."
These days I find exercising patience for the sake of optimism much more challenging, and somewhat unnecessary, but I took Smith's suggestion. It is now two days later.
I asked @RickFraserMLA if there was any news, and did not involve Smith because I knew she was in Red Deer for the day. The Government of Alberta's twitter feed @YourAlberta responded instead, telling me that nothing has been started except to make the floodmaps mobile-device accessible. Apparently that will be ready next week.
Priority has been set on making sure I can read this on my cellphone, not whether or not what I'm reading is even accurate or applicable.
So finally, I am pulling my Alberta Party hat out. I have worked hard to avoid doing it, but I cannot any longer, knowing that what we need is not what either the PC government is willing to work for, nor is Danielle Smith going to do as she waits in optimism.
Wearing my Alberta Party hat in the constituency of Highwood, I will work to make sure floodplain maps are updated immediately. You don't need to elect me to do this. I will do it because I know it is needed. We'll start with the Highwood constituency, and then I will continue this work starting at all communities close to the mountains and working our way downstream of each river system in Alberta. We will endeavour to skip the three-stages of process-before-the-request-process-to-start-the-process and get this going right away because we need it in our hands already. If we can't do that, we'll pressure the process to get done faster.
Don't worry, this won't be the only thing the Alberta Party in Highwood works on, as there is a great deal more that needs our common sense input. If you would like to help in this, feel free to join me. Send me a message at aphighwood@gmail.com, and we'll get this work done so Albertans know what they need to know.
The Alberta Party will make common sense work for you.
Lake Hampton has been in the making for years
Numerous posts on various sites I have seen, including Facebook, news article comments, and many more, have given credit for the creation of unofficially named Lake Hampton to the new Tongue Creek Road extension, known to many as the George Groeneveld Bridge, or 498th Avenue. At first blush, that would make sense, given the map below.
However, people passing this judgement seem to have forgotten that this map is woefully incomplete. It's missing the road that goes past the cemetery (5th Street) and doesn't even show Tongue Creek Road, nor the new overpass.
It also doesn't show how far north Lake Hampton actually goes.
Observe an updated map of High River, with some annotations that I will explain. I recommend clicking on it to read the annotations.
The Highwood normally flows underneath Tongue Creek Road at the new George Groeneveld Bridge. The floodplain goes right up to those green lines, which is where 5th Avenue used to be before the overpass was built. For every flood previous to this one, the old 5th Street berm prevented the water from coming back. During the first day of the flood, this was still true. However, once it got north past Tongue Creek Road, the water levels in this year's flood were beyond anything we'd ever seen, and the banks were over-run.
The water spilled out into farmer's fields north of the Tongue Creek Road, and continued filling up, almost all the way out to Cargill. The only thing preventing it from flowing further east was Highway 2. Tongue Creek Road dips a bit before rising to the new overpass, and that is where the water spilled back. This is what the media meant when they said "the river had turned back on itself".
Between the new 5th Street and the new 20th Street Crossover, the land is low, and dips ultimately to just north of the Hamptons. When the water came over Tongue Creek Road, the terrain was already perfectly designed to become a lake. No developers had worked there yet, and so no blame can be laid on them for making the land too low. This low-lying land was always there. It was just that there had never been that much water before.
Observe the map below, circa 2002. Holy Spirit Academy, the school that remained underwater for almost a month in this year's flood, hadn't even been built yet. Neither had the Tongue Creek extension nor the new overpass.
5th Street was always there. The river always ran north. 498th Avenue was always there. Had we not built the extension to Tongue Creek Road, the area we now know as the Hamptons would still have become a lake. All those naysayers suggesting the new road caused all this are dead wrong.
Could we have seen this coming? Considering Lake Hampton eventually covered approximately 15 square miles of land (approximately the same size as Sylvan Lake), I'd say no.
Did those berms affect the flow, and make the creation of Lake Hampton more likely? Certainly a possibility. Where that berm ended is where the breach of the banks occurred that ended up resulting in half of a town sitting underwater for 3 weeks. I can't imagine that a berm is the best solution on its own anymore.
So what do we do instead of berms? I'll save that for the next post.
(For interest's sake, now that the Lake has been pumped out, some other lines of land have reappeared, particularly Tongue Creek Road, 20th Street, and a fenceline that once separated the Town of High River from the M.D. of the Foothills, somewhat north of the Hamptons. These lines of land have now effectively cut Lake Hampton into 4 bodies of water, which I have labelled Lake Hampton 1, 2, 3 and 4 in my annotated map)


Towards 'biliteracy and trilingualism' in Hong Kong (SAR): Problems, dilemmas and stakeholders' views
Chor Shing David LI
Department of Linguistics and Modern Language Studies (LML)
Despite the Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region) government's determination to implement the 'mother tongue education' policy amid strong social resistance one year after the handover, English remains a prestigious language in society. The need for Putonghua (Mandarin/Standard Chinese) is also increasing following ever-expanding trade and other activities with mainland China. The societal demand for both English and Putonghua in postcolonial Hong Kong is important for understanding the SAR government's language-in-education policy called 'biliteracy and trilingualism'. The learning of English is fraught with two main problems: (a) the absence of a conducive language-learning environment outside the classroom, which makes English in Hong Kong more like a foreign than a second language, and (b) tremendous typological difference between Chinese and English on one hand, and considerable linguistic differences between Cantonese and Putonghua on the other. Given the significant phonological differences and, to a lesser extent, lexico-grammatical divergence between the majority's vernacular and modern written Chinese, the learning of Putonghua is no straightforward task either. The dilemmas of the medium-of-instruction (MoI) debate will be discussed by elucidating the main concerns as seen from the respective vantage points of the government and five key stakeholder groups: employers, parents, school principals, teachers and educationalists, and students. Copyright © 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company.
AILA Review
https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.22.06li
Li, D. C. S. (2009). Towards 'biliteracy and trilingualism' in Hong Kong (SAR): Problems, dilemmas and stakeholders' views. AILA Review, 22, 72-84.
10.1075/aila.22.06li
pre-published version
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards 'biliteracy and trilingualism' in Hong Kong (SAR): Problems, dilemmas and stakeholders' views'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Trilingualism Arts & Humanities 100%
Biliteracy Arts & Humanities 100%
Putonghua Arts & Humanities 72%
administrative regions Social Sciences 68%
Hong Kong Arts & Humanities 47%
stakeholder Social Sciences 36%
Stakeholders Arts & Humanities 32%


March 19th COVID-19 Patient Update from Redmond Regional Center
March 19th, 2020 – 5:30 PM
Redmond Regional Center –
Redmond Regional Medical Center has protocols in place to care for patients with infectious diseases, and we have been working diligently to ensure we are prepared for potential issues related to COVID-19. Redmond confirms that one patient who tested positive for COVID-19, has passed. Out of respect for the family and the privacy of the patient, we have no additional details to share. Our thoughts and prayers are with the family. Since March 8th, there have been six patients who have tested positive for COVID-19 (two, of which, currently remain as inpatients). To date, five patients have tested negative. There are 28 patients pending test results. We are following infection prevention protocols for COVID-19 patients, including isolation, to help ensure the safety of our colleagues, patients and visitors, and we continue to work closely with the CDC and the Georgia Department of Public Health.
We continue reinforcing infection prevention protocols and screening procedures at hospital entrances as a proactive measure. We have positioned supplies at points of entry, so that any potential symptomatic patient who arrives can be properly masked and immediately isolated to protect our colleagues and other patients.
Currently, a "No Visitor" policy is in effect with the following exceptions and allowances:
Outpatient Surgery or Outpatient Testing – 1 Caregiver
Hospice Patient – Special Exception, case-by-case
Redmond EMS will not be able to transport additional passengers with patients to the ER except in special circumstances as determined by the paramedic on scene
Other exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Redmond Regional Medical Center encourages alternative communication with patients such as audio call, FaceTime, text or email during this time.
Maintaining a safe environment for our patients, colleagues and community is of the highest priority.
We are incredibly proud of our team for their dedication to our patients and community. We are following infection prevention protocols for COVID-19 patients, including isolation, to help ensure the safety of our colleagues, patients and visitors, and we continue to work closely with the CDC and the Georgia Department of Public Health. Our colleagues have come together, even more so than usual, to see our patients and community through this difficult time. Every day, they are living our mission: "Above all else, we are committed to the care and improvement of human life."


Environmental crisis
Weed Vapes Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2026
Steve B. Russell June 19, 2022
Pakistan is facing a serious environmental crisis
Baby Jewelry Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2026
Steve B. Russell February 20, 2022
UNEP celebrates 50 years by focusing on immediate environmental issues
Professional Mouth Sprays Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2029
Steve B. Russell July 1, 2022
William tells Cate Blanchett he hopes the environmental crisis can be overcome
Steve B. Russell April 13, 2022
800Gbps Transceivers Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2026
Steve B. Russell December 11, 2021
Disposable and Reusable Respirators Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2025
Steve B. Russell January 30, 2022
The environmental crisis is a social crisis: how activism is made sustainable
Steve B. Russell June 8, 2020
Today is World Oceans Day – a day to recognize and nurture our appreciation for something that covers most of the planet and is an integral part of caring. A healthy ocean supports a healthy planet, which is why talking about how we care for and protect it deserves a more in-depth conversation than usual.
The environmental crisis is a social crisis. It is a perspective that is not often explored, but it has the most impact on the daily lives of people in developing countries, and many of its driving forces lie in the secure and stable social structures of the world. life in the first world.
"If the environmental and social chaos of the past few years and weeks has shown us anything, it's that our global operating system is full of bugs," said Michael Stewart, co-founder of Sustainable Surf. "The environmental, economic and social crisis are interconnected. We believe it is time for the healthy oceans movement to start connecting all of these dots together, so we are focused on taking action within the ocean community to collectively address this issue. "
So how do all of these things relate?
In the West Papua region of Indonesia, for example, village-level poverty is a major driver of deforestation in its mangrove estuaries. And healthy mangrove ecosystems actually protect coastal communities from flooding and store five times more carbon per acre than tropical forests. It's stories like these that reinforce Sustainable Surf's statement that there is no climate justice without social justice. Their Marine trees The platform, designed to regenerate and protect coastal ecosystems, allows individuals and brands to easily fund mangrove restoration, creating sustainable jobs for the local indigenous communities who live there. Local people are hired to plant and care for mangroves, infusing both hard currency and reliable jobs in the area.
"It's not just about planting trees with our local partner, Eden Projects, then forget about them, "says Michael. "The local community is trained to take care of these ecosystems and develop food crops. And perhaps more importantly, when we went to West Papua with our Ambassador Pacha Light and our ocean friends at Protect blue, we also ran local workshops with local community activists to provide ocean health education to their next generation. "
"We will pay you not only to build it, but to be its stewards and stewards. Pride and ownership. They are creating a new structure for people. Photo: Protect Blue / Eden Projects / SeaTrees
The same philosophy is linked to other projects supported by SeaTrees, such as watershed protection in Cambodia, where they partner with Wildlife Alliance. Or even as the regeneration of kelp forests in California approaches by working with The Bay Foundation, the master plan is always based on local and effective action because that is what is sustainable. Whether it is offsetting carbon emissions or cleaning up and restoring a specific ecosystem, the solution is only a solution if it is sustainable, and more precisely, if it responds to the challenges of poverty, inequalities, climate change, environmental degradation, peace and justice.
The work Sustainable Surf does through SeaTrees is designed to meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, a 17 point plan that outlines how all of these things are interconnected and can be transformed over the next decade. Hunger, education, gender inequality, decent work and economic growth may sound like social problems, but they are each just one link in a system that connects to consumption and consumption. responsible production, drinking water and clean energy, which we generally associate most closely with environmental issues.
"In short, SeaTrees isn't just about pushing a button on your phone to plant trees, although it's something you can do. It is a digital platform that provides communities, like those in West Papua, with the resources and support to restore and protect their local ecosystem for the long term.
The Sustainable Surf model seems to be working. In its first year of operation, the platform: planted 115,000 mangroves, sequestered 24,000 tonnes of CO2, protected 55 different species and supported 34 communities including those in West Papua.
In a digital world, the next obvious link at Sustainable Surf was to develop and launch a mobile app, which they called the Ocean Positive app. The app, explains Michael, not only lets you plant "10 mangroves in 10 seconds," it's a pocket guide to keeping a finger on the pulse of other types of ocean-positive activism. The app focuses on content relevant to the environmental, economic and social issues at hand: community-hosted events and demonstrations, plant-based food, banking, volunteering, choosing better amenities for our oceans, and even more.
Download the Ocean Positive app today.
"All of the world's major scientific and political organizations, including the United Nations," says Michael, "tell us we have about 10 years to mend the mess we've made with climate change before we pass a tipping point that our ocean and planet may not be able to return. We are all going to have to work together to solve this problem.
Editor's Note: This feature was produced in partnership with Sustainable surf. Download the Ocean Positive app here.
Amid environmental crisis, Novato executives must rethink Costco gas station – Marin Independent Journal
An environmental crisis in Borneo
Extreme weather in Charlottesville heralds a more serious environmental crisis
Open defecation poses environmental crisis in Oshodi-Isolo – Nigeria – The Guardian Nigeria News – Nigeria and World News
Dynamic Lighting Products Market Overview, Environmental Analysis and Forecast to 2026
Trump's latest executive order could allow agencies to shirk their environmental liability
COP27 ends as the environmental crisis continues
FSO Safer tanker will cause environmental crisis on Yemen's coast
How local green activists are tackling the unfolding environmental crisis in northeast Syria
asia pacific climate change copy report east africa europe asia forecast period growth rate market report market share market size middle east north america research report south america united states
Climate March raises awareness of environmental issues and calls for divestment from fossil fuel companies | New
County Council faces calls to go 'further and faster' on environmental issues
New Victorian election poll finds environmental issues more influential than infrastructure and Covid


Who Dat? — S (Part 2)
November 14, 2020 by Ken Rudin
We had so much success with our first round of "S" unknown buttons that we're offering a second batch — and these look even tougher.
As our fellow political junkies know, for some time now we've been showing photos of unknown buttons, arranged alphabetically by candidate names, for you to help identify. We can't make heads or tails of these candidates, most of whom we've never heard of. And when we see a "Smith for Congress" or a "Jones for Senator" button, how do we know which Smith or which Jones? So we've been posting pictures of these buttons, hoping you will have the answer. Often, you have come through, which is most appreciated.
Thus far, we've completed the first 17 letters of the alphabet. (Check out our previous "Who Dats": Unknowns beginning with the Letter A, Letter B, two pages for Letter C (here and here), Letter D, Letter E, Letter F, Letter G, Letter H, Letter I, Letter J, Letter K, Letter L, Letter M, Letter N, Letter O, Letter P, Letter R and the first part of Letter S.) Let the record show we don't have enough unknown Q candidates to list. We even have one of buttons with pictures only — no names. That's even harder to decipher.
We now bring you to part two of the Letter S. Any idea on who these S candidates R? Thanks!
Categories Ken's Blog Post navigation
Election 2020: Biden Wins Presidency, GOP Gains In House & Retains Senate Majority
Remembering Those Who Left Us In 2020
13 thoughts on "Who Dat? — S (Part 2)"
Paul Sliter: https://missoulian.com/house-gop-leader-dies-in-suv-crash/article_b01749c1-ccf7-5c11-b92c-e6a1b2b346ca.html
Michael Engel
Schmidt, George K. — of Chicago, Cook County, Ill. Republican. Presidential Elector for Illinois, 1920; candidate in primary for mayor of Chicago, Ill., 1931.
Schipman, James R. — of Florence, Florence County, S.C. Mayor of Florence, S.C., 1953-54.
Sonnenschein, Henry — of Chicago, Cook County, Ill. Democrat. Delegate to Democratic National Convention from Illinois, 1936 (alternate), 1940, 1944, 1948. (Also comes up in Google list of Chicago aldermen)
Ted Soboslay—Trumbull County, Ohio, 1990s
Sliter, Paul (c.1969-2001) — of Montana. Born about 1969. Republican. Member of Montana state house of representatives, 1997-2001; died in office 2001. Killed in an automobile accident, when the Ford Explorer sport utility vehicle in which he was a passenger ran off the road and flipped over, near Helena, Lewis and Clark County, Mont., August 15, 2001 (age about 32 years). Shane Hedges, the driver of the car, was charged with drunk driving and negligent homicide.
Shimizu, Tom — Republican. Candidate for U.S. Representative from Utah 2nd District, 1986. Still living as of 1986.
"Shane" Sandridge – Colorado General Assembly (current)
Frank I. Smith- Richmond County, NY (Staten Island) – 1940s
Marsha Smith – not political. National Education Association
Gerald Seyfried – Northampton County, PA – 1980s
Jack Schlosser – Middletown, NY 1964-65
Murray Stahl – Maumee, Ohio – 1950s-1960s?
Daniel Fox
Otis M. Smith and Paul L. Adams — The Democratic ticket for the Michigan Supreme Court in 1962. Smith won, Adams lost.
Smith, incidentally, was the first African-American to win statewide office in Michigan, having been elected State Auditor in 1958 and 1960, and also the first African-American on the Michigan Supreme Court.
And not far from Michigan, we have Maumee, Ohio, which is a Toledo suburb. Murray Stahl was the unsuccessful GOP nominee for Mayor there in 1989.
Harry Semrow was a longtime Chicago Democratic pol who was elected to the Cook County Board of Appeals in 1970, '74, '78, '82, and '86. He died in office in 1987.
"Swanson State's Attorney" – another Cook County item. John Swanson defeated State's Attorney Robert Crowe in the 1928 Republican primary — known to organized-crime historians as the "Pineapple Primary" because bombs were used against several political figures, including Swanson. Swanson was elected in November, but went down with the GOP ticket in 1932.
"Shimizu crew" – Tom Shimizu was a Salt Lake County commissioner and the 1986 Republican nominee for Congress in Utah 2.
Photo here:
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=Aul-kAQHnToC&dat=19861102&printsec=frontpage&hl=en
"Scalise" — I believe this is Lawrence Scalise, who was the Democratic nominee for attorney general of Iowa in 1962, was elected A.G. on LBJ's coattails in 1964, and was swept out again in the GOP wave of 1966. I have one of these, which I acquired as part of an assortment of Iowa buttons from the mid-60s.
"Draft Sweitzer for Mayor" — Probably Robert Sweitzer, the longtime Cook County clerk who was Democratic nominee for mayor of Chicago in 1915 and 1919, losing both times to William Hale Thompson.
"Paul Sliter for House District 76" — Paul Sliter was a Montana state rep., elected from House District 76 (Flathead County) in 1994, 1996, 1998, and 2000. In 2001, he was house majority leader. He died in an auto accident in 2001. This indirectly ended the career of Gov. Judy Martz, because one of her aides was driving; the aide was drunk; and Gov. Martz washed the aide's bloodstained clothing after the accident.
"Re-elect Eph Shapero Co. Legislator" — Republican Ephraim E. "Eph" Shapero was elected a member of the first Onondaga County Legislature in 1967. (Before that, he was a county supervisor.) He was re-elected in 1969, 1971, and 1973 and retired in 1975.
"Stambaugh for Senator" — possibly Lynn Stambaugh, who primaried Sen. Gerald Nye (R-ND) in 1944, then ran as an independent, perhaps contributing to Nye's general-election defeat.
David Vandeviver
'Skinner for Sheriff' oval: Albert W. Skinner [1893-1975] Republican Monroe Co. NY [Rochester] Sheriff for 12 terms [1938-73] county jail known as 'Skinner's Hotel'


From Iceland — Ministry Not Responding To Lawyers
Ministry Not Responding To Lawyers
The Interior Ministry has yet to deliver the "unofficial documents" that were leaked to some members of the press concerning a Nigeria asylum seeker.
Stefán Karl Kristjánsson, the lawyer for Nigerian asylum seeker Tony Omos, told DV that, despite filing a formal request for the documents, he has yet to receive the leaked documents that said – incorrectly – that Tony was suspected of being involved in human trafficking, and is not the father of the child being carried by his girlfriend, Evelyn Glory Joseph.
Evelyn's lawyer, Katrín Oddsdóttir, said that she had also filed a formal request to see the documents, and has not received any answer from the ministry.
A unnamed government employee that DV spoke to remarked, "I would say it is very unusual and especially strange that the ministry won't even answer the formal request of a lawyer."
DV have filed a request of their own. In addition to their request for the documents, they have also asked the ministry who has or had access to said documents, who within the ministry has access to personal information on asylum seekers, and what measures have been or will be taken in the wake of the leak. The ministry has yet to respond.
As reported, Tony is facing deportation, and is currently in hiding from the police. Last week, "unofficial ministry documents" given to members of the press stated that Tony was suspected of being involved in human trafficking and is not the father of the child being carried by his girlfriend, Evelyn Glory Joseph.
Not only did these accusations prove untrue – the "unofficial ministry documents" do not exist within ministry files. An assistant to Interior Minister Hanna Birna Kristjánsdóttir, Gísli Freyr Valdórsson, speculated that a ministry employee may have created the documents themselves, later clarifying that he did not intend to impugn the ministry staff.
While the ministry has since attempted to distance itself from the leak, legal experts and former government employees raised questions about the wording of the ministry's statement on the matter, suggesting that their word choice was deliberately evasive.
Tony's asylum application had been in processing for 22 months at the time the decision to deport him was made, despite the fact that Article 19 of Dublin Regulation II – an international law regarding refugee rights and treatment – requires that either deportation occur "at the latest within six months" of an application submission or that the application process for asylum be completed within "a maximum of one year". Iceland is a signatory of this agreement.
Furthermore, legal experts DV spoke to added, according to Article 9 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, "States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child." Iceland became a signatory of this agreement last February.
Next: Champagne Club Re-Opens
Previous: Fear Of Espionage At Cabinet Meetings
Grub & Grog: Bryggjan Brugghús Cooks With Beer, Glorious Beer


Carhartt Luggage, cinda b, TSD Handbags Handbags $30 to $50
X Carhartt
X cinda b
X TSD
Urban Light Coated Canvas Crossbody
Hipster II
Essentials Tote
Tapa Canvas Sling Bag
Crossbody Bags (2)
About Carhartt Luggage, cinda b, TSD Handbags Handbags $30 to $50
Carhartt manufactures premium work packs, bags and gear known for exceptional durability, quality of construction and functionality that you can see in their performance. Back in 1889, Hamilton Carhartt began making work wear with a single goal in mind: to set a standard of excellence to which all others would aspire. Starting with only four sewing machines and five employees, the first products manufactured were overalls in duck and denim fabrics. With entrepreneurial vision and determination, Hamilton Carhartt established a brand that has withstood the test of time. More than 120 years later, we continue to adhere to those same values and are now proud to offer an extensive line of work packs, duffels, messenger bags, tool bags, briefs and totes.,,


Aristotle's Bench Press in News May 4, 2016 May 4, 2016 265 Words
E.U: The Velvet Gloves Come Off
A test of any institution, or individual for that matter, is how they respond in a crisis. For decades the people of Europe have been sold the narrative that the E.U. is a benign parental body which seeks to promote unity and avoid the possibility of there ever being another war between European nations.
Thus far the E.U. has faced two crises – the sovereign debt crisis and the ongoing immigration crisis, and on both occasions it has quickly demonstrated its true personality by pulling off the velvet gloves to reveal the iron fist of membership to the Candy Haus.
As the Telegraph reports:
The European Commission will impose fines of hundreds of millions of pounds on countries that do not take in refugees.
Jean-Claude Junker is tomorrow expected to unveil plans to impose a penalty of around €250,000 euros per rejected refugee, in a bid to salvage his botched migration quota scheme.
In short: any member state who decides that Islamic immigration is not for them, will be coerced into taking the quota allotted to them by the E.U.
This move is specifically aimed at former Soviet bloc countries like Hungary; the Czech Republic; Poland & Slovakia who have decided that mass Muslim immigration is not in their nation's best interests long term. Wonder where they got that idea?
Eastern European states opposed the scheme for two reasons: because they said refugee admissions should be a sovereign national decision; and because many of their voters are virulently opposed to Muslim immigration.
So much for sovereignty and common sense.
End Game for Old Europe
As Surely As Night Follows Day


The original item was published from 11/8/2019 2:40:55 PM to 12/9/2019 12:00:02 AM.
[ARCHIVED] One year later, 'Camp Fire' memories and lessons feel fresh
South Lake Tahoe, CA- It's been one year since the deadliest fire in California history. The Camp Fire burned thousands of homes and claimed 85 lives in its path. As we remember those who lost their lives one year later, we are also grateful for the brave men and women who fought hard to save as many lives and homes as possible.
"We got there and the town of Paradise was gone," said Cpt. Tyler Jack who has been with South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue for years. "We train for it. We're prepared for it on a much smaller scale than I really knew before I went to the Camp Fire."
He worked the Angora Fire, his parents lost their home, but the Camp Fire was different.
"We got there late afternoon early evening and went right into intense firefighting for the next 12 hours," said Jack.
He shot hours of footage as he and other firefighters and first responders worked hard to save homes and lives. He says it's impossible to prepare for a fire that leaves nothing behind.
"These other fires it was fire rolls through, destroys a good portion of the town and then you put the fire out and go home," said Jack. "Well, for the Camp Fire, it was 4 or 5 days of firefighting and then we totally switched gears into body recoveries for the next 6, 7 days."
One year later he says lessons from the Camp Fire are still with him.
"Going to the Camp Fire was a rude awakening that we have a lot of work to do here," Jack said.
On this grim anniversary, his thoughts are with those who are still grappling with all they've lost.
"I can only imagine the community down there," said Jack, "What their year has been like. My heart goes out to them."
The fire in Paradise forced a lot of communities, South Lake Tahoe included, to reevaluate their fire preparedness. For details on our updated evacuation plans, and how you can prepare for any kind of emergency, click here.