| [ |
| { |
| "file_id": "X-ix97pw0xY", |
| "query_id": 2, |
| "timestamp": 1684511180783.0, |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ |
| 697, |
| 697 |
| ], |
| "names": [ |
| "annotator1", |
| "annotator2" |
| ], |
| "text": "Thanks for your presentation. Please in the case we use ordinal logit , should we report pearson correlation and omnibus test value? if it is the case, how to interpret them (for exemple, under or above p value, what it is the meaning). Also shoud we consider the sig level from the table 'Test of model effect' or 'Parameter Estimates' table to say that a relationship between the predictor and outcome variable is significant. I am really looking for ways to interpret, your answer will really help me. thanks." |
| }, |
| { |
| "file_id": "X-ix97pw0xY", |
| "query_id": 3, |
| "timestamp": 1684511272691.0, |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ |
| 62, |
| 63, |
| 64 |
| ], |
| "names": [ |
| "annotator1" |
| ], |
| "text": "It is mentioned that \"phi is known positive value\" (Lecture 23: 16.28 min). I am wondering, if exponential dist. comes under canonical exponential family (or not), where theta = lambda, b(theta) = ln(theta) and phi = -1?" |
| }, |
| { |
| "file_id": "X-ix97pw0xY", |
| "query_id": 0, |
| "timestamp": 1684191675943.0, |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ |
| 188, |
| 252 |
| ], |
| "names": [ |
| "annotator1" |
| ], |
| "text": "Sorry I'm having trouble keeping up, but for the Poisson example, where does that expression for mu(x) come from?\n\n\nThis is terrific by the way- thank you MIT for helping me stay even a little afloat in one of my classes." |
| } |
| ] |
