rmems commited on
Commit
6ef2152
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 2d53792

Adding the output of SymbolicRegression.jl.

Browse files
New symbolic regression equation/hall_of_fame.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:583c78df9f4ae9e859f59b9b54901b7fcc256495d6941e813e4aa5f78619aaf4
3
+ size 487
New symbolic regression equation/saaq_1_5_delta_q_adaptation_law.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # SAAQ 1.5 Delta-Q Adaptation Law
2
+
3
+ ## Proposed Update Law
4
+
5
+ The new symbolic-regression result can be expressed in its raw discovered form as:
6
+
7
+ ```latex
8
+ \[
9
+ \mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_target}
10
+ \approx
11
+ \left(\sqrt{\mathrm{avg\_pop\_firing\_rate\_hz}}\cdot 0.05727633160985141\right)
12
+ -
13
+ \left(\frac{\mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_prev}}{-2.015263764843582}\right)
14
+ \]
15
+ ```
16
+
17
+ A simplified equivalent approximation is:
18
+
19
+ ```latex
20
+ \[
21
+ \mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_target}
22
+ \approx
23
+ 0.0573\,\sqrt{\mathrm{avg\_pop\_firing\_rate\_hz}}
24
+ +
25
+ 0.4962\,\mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_prev}
26
+ \]
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ ## Variable Breakdown
30
+
31
+ - **$\mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_target}$**: The new target quantization adjustment for the current update step.
32
+ - **$\mathrm{avg\_pop\_firing\_rate\_hz}$**: The average population firing rate, measured in hertz, representing current global spike activity pressure.
33
+ - **$\mathrm{saaq\_delta\_q\_prev}$**: The previous delta-q value carried over from the last update step.
34
+ - **$\sqrt{\mathrm{avg\_pop\_firing\_rate\_hz}}$**: A sublinear activity term that compresses large increases in firing pressure.
35
+ - **$0.05727633160985141$**: The discovered gain on the square-root firing-drive term.
36
+ - **$2.015263764843582$**: The denominator in the carryover term from the raw symbolic-regression expression.
37
+ - **$0.4962$**: The simplified carryover coefficient, indicating that roughly half of the previous delta-q state remains active in the next update.
38
+
39
+ ## Plain-Language Interpretation
40
+
41
+ ### 1. Square-root activity drive
42
+ The first term says that delta-q should increase as population firing increases, but not in a straight linear way. Because the firing term is under a square root, strong activity still matters, but its effect is compressed. That means the system responds to global spike pressure without letting very high firing rates explode the quantization update.
43
+
44
+ ### 2. Half-memory carryover
45
+ The second term says that the new target delta-q does not start from zero at every step. Roughly half of the previous delta-q value is retained. This gives the adaptation law continuity over time instead of forcing the system to constantly re-estimate quantization pressure from scratch.
46
+
47
+ ### 3. Leaky recurrence
48
+ Taken together, the equation behaves like a leaky recurrent controller:
49
+
50
+ - current firing activity pushes delta-q upward,
51
+ - previous delta-q state persists,
52
+ - but the carryover is less than 1.0, so the process does not simply accumulate forever.
53
+
54
+ That makes the law stable and interpretable. It acts more like a controlled adaptive process than a noisy feedthrough rule.
55
+
56
+ ## Why It Matters
57
+
58
+ ### Sublinear compression
59
+ The square-root term is important because it creates **sublinear compression**. If spike activity doubles, delta-q does not double with it. This is desirable for hardware-aware SNN quantization because it prevents aggressive overreaction during bursts of collective activity.
60
+
61
+ ### Fatigue compatibility
62
+ This law is naturally compatible with fatigue-style dynamics. Higher activity still raises the quantization target, but it does so in a way that is bounded and softened. That makes it a plausible companion to biologically inspired fatigue or resistance mechanisms instead of fighting them.
63
+
64
+ ### Temporal inertia
65
+ The carryover term provides **temporal inertia**. Delta-q remembers where it was, which helps smooth fast oscillations and prevents quantization from thrashing between states. In practice, this makes the control signal easier to port into a native SNN runtime such as Spikenaut.
66
+
67
+ ## Relationship to SAAQ 1.0
68
+
69
+ SAAQ 1.0 and SAAQ 1.5 can be framed as a two-layer control structure:
70
+
71
+ ### SAAQ 1.0: voltage bounding
72
+ SAAQ 1.0 establishes the base stabilizer by bounding latent voltage with the L2-normalized voltage law:
73
+
74
+ ```latex
75
+ \[
76
+ V_{\text{norm}} = \frac{V}{\sqrt{\sum V_i^2 + \epsilon}}
77
+ \]
78
+ ```
79
+
80
+ This prevents raw voltage from collapsing the routing process into a single dominant path.
81
+
82
+ ### SAAQ 1.5: quantization adaptation
83
+ SAAQ 1.5 operates one layer above that. Instead of directly bounding voltage, it adapts the quantization target over time based on:
84
+
85
+ - current global activity pressure,
86
+ - previous quantization state.
87
+
88
+ So the relationship is:
89
+
90
+ - **SAAQ 1.0** controls **voltage magnitude**.
91
+ - **SAAQ 1.5** controls **how quantization pressure evolves over time**.
92
+
93
+ Put more simply, SAAQ 1.0 keeps the system from blowing up, while SAAQ 1.5 tells the system how fast and how far to adapt once it is stabilized.
94
+
95
+ ## Scope and Caveat
96
+
97
+ This equation should be treated as a **global baseline adaptation law**, not necessarily the final universal law for every routing regime.
98
+
99
+ That matters because your telemetry already suggests **piecewise routing behavior** across different prompt families and basin structures. So this formula is best understood as:
100
+
101
+ - a strong global controller,
102
+ - a clean first portable law,
103
+ - and a good candidate for transfer into Spikenaut.
104
+
105
+ But it may not be the final word. Later work may show that different routing basins need slightly different local adaptation laws.
106
+
107
+ That does not weaken the discovery. It clarifies the role of SAAQ 1.5:
108
+
109
+ > a stable, interpretable global delta-q controller that can serve as the baseline adaptation law before basin-conditioned refinements are introduced.
110
+
111
+ ## Portability to Spikenaut
112
+
113
+ One of the strongest qualities of this equation is that it is small, interpretable, and runtime-friendly. It uses:
114
+
115
+ - a square root,
116
+ - a scalar gain,
117
+ - and a linear carryover term.
118
+
119
+ That makes it far easier to port into a native SNN such as Spikenaut than a deeply nested symbolic expression with many fragile operations. Even if later symbolic-regression passes discover more accurate local laws, this version is likely to remain valuable as the first practical adaptation controller for deployment and ablation testing.