Update dataset README and metadata for drift detection frameworks
Browse filesUpdates the dataset README for AI drift detection frameworks.
Clarifies:
drift detection across data, performance, behavioral, semantic, and system layers
application to LLMs, agents, and production AI systems
focus on alignment, usefulness, and real-world performance over time
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,113 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 5 |
+
- question-answering
|
| 6 |
+
- text-retrieval
|
| 7 |
+
language:
|
| 8 |
+
- en
|
| 9 |
+
tags:
|
| 10 |
+
- llm
|
| 11 |
+
- ai
|
| 12 |
+
- model-drift
|
| 13 |
+
- drift-detection
|
| 14 |
+
- evaluation
|
| 15 |
+
- ai-alignment
|
| 16 |
+
- monitoring
|
| 17 |
+
- mlops
|
| 18 |
+
- agents
|
| 19 |
+
- ai-governance
|
| 20 |
+
- ai-risk
|
| 21 |
+
- model-evaluation
|
| 22 |
+
- semantic-drift
|
| 23 |
+
- system-analysis
|
| 24 |
+
- reliability
|
| 25 |
+
pretty_name: AI Drift Detection Frameworks
|
| 26 |
+
---
|
| 27 |
+
# AI Drift Detection Frameworks
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
A structured collection of frameworks, checklists, and evaluation methods for detecting drift in AI systems, including large language models (LLMs), agent workflows, and production machine learning systems.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
---
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Overview
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
Most AI systems do not fail abruptly. Outputs remain fluent, structured, and internally consistent.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
But systems can degrade while still appearing to work.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
This dataset documents a recurring pattern:
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
> Systems preserve coherence while gradually losing alignment with intent, context, and real-world conditions.
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
Each document focuses on a different layer of drift detection and reframes model degradation as a structural issue rather than a visible failure.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
---
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
## Contents
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
- [LLM Drift Detection — Why AI Outputs Degrade Without Errors](./llm-drift-detection-why-ai-outputs-degrade-without-errors.pdf)
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
- [AI Model Audit Checklist — Drift Detection in Production Systems](./ai-model-audit-checklist-drift-detection.pdf)
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
- [Model Drift Detection Framework — Machine Learning Systems](./model-drift-detection-framework-machine-learning.pdf)
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
- [Institutional Drift Detection Framework](./institutional-drift-detection-framework.pdf)
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
---
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
## Drift Types Covered
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
- Data drift (input distribution changes)
|
| 62 |
+
- Performance drift (metric-level degradation)
|
| 63 |
+
- Behavioral drift (changes in system outputs)
|
| 64 |
+
- Semantic drift (loss of meaning or intent alignment)
|
| 65 |
+
- System drift (compounding misalignment across workflows)
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
---
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
## Core Idea
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
Standard evaluation focuses on accuracy and correctness.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
This framework focuses on whether systems remain:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- aligned with user intent
|
| 76 |
+
- grounded in real-world conditions
|
| 77 |
+
- useful over time
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
Drift often emerges without triggering metrics, making it difficult to detect using traditional monitoring approaches.
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
---
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
## Intended Use
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
This dataset is useful for:
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
- monitoring LLMs and production AI systems
|
| 88 |
+
- designing evaluation frameworks beyond accuracy
|
| 89 |
+
- analyzing agent and multi-step system behavior
|
| 90 |
+
- implementing AI governance and risk frameworks
|
| 91 |
+
- detecting alignment failures in real-world deployments
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
---
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
## Not Intended For
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
This is not a benchmark dataset or training dataset.
|
| 98 |
+
It is a conceptual and diagnostic resource for understanding system behavior and detecting drift in deployed AI systems.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
---
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
## Core framework and sources
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
- Research Library (GitHub): [Semantic Fidelity Lab Repository](https://github.com/therealitydrift/semantic-fidelity-lab)
|
| 105 |
+
- Articles & Essays (Substack): [Reality Drift](https://therealitydrift.substack.com)
|
| 106 |
+
- Primary DOI Record: [Figshare Collection](https://figshare.com/)
|
| 107 |
+
- Concept Glossary: [Semantic Fidelity Glossary](https://offbrandguy.com/semantic-fidelity-glossary/)
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
---
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
## License
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
CC BY 4.0
|