diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_12/raw/doc_12_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_12/raw/doc_12_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_12/raw/doc_12_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,5714 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n(Exchange Rate Effective October 31, 2023)\n\n\nCurrency Unit = Kenya Shilling (K Sh)\n\n\nUS$1 = EUR 0.94\n\n\nUS$1 = KSh 150.70\n\n\nUS$1 = SDR 0.76\n\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJuly 1 - June 31\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Victoria Kwakwa\n\n\nRegional Director: Iain G. Shuker\n\n\nCountry Director: Keith E. Hansen\n\n\nPractice Manager: Francis Ghesquiere\n\n\nTask Team Leaders: Pascaline Wanjiku Ndungu, Victor Vazquez Alvarez\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS**\n\n\n|AM|Accountability Mechanism|\n|---|---|\n|APA|Annual Performance Assessment|\n|BCC|Behavior Change Communication|\n|CAJ|Commission on Administrative Justice|\n|CBA|Cost-Benefit Analysis|\n|CEC|County Executive Committee|\n|CLTS|Community-Led Total Sanitation|\n|CPF|Country Partnership Framework|\n|CWS|Community-Wide Sanitation|\n|CWSS&IP|County-Wide Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan|\n|DLI|Disbursement-Linked Indicator|\n|DRS|Department of Refugee Services|\n|ECD|Early Childhood Development|\n|E&S|Environmental and Social|\n|EIRR|Economic Internal Rate of Return|\n|ESHS|Environmental, Social, Health, and Safety|\n|ESHSRM|Environmental, Social, Health and Safety Risks Management|\n|ESMF|Environmental and Social Management Framework|\n|ESSA|Environmental and Social Systems Assessment|\n|FM|Financial Management|\n|FSA|Fiduciary Systems Assessment|\n|GDP|Gross Domestic Product|\n|GHG|Greenhouse Gas|\n|GM|Grievance Management|\n|GoK|Government of Kenya|\n|GRS|Grievance Redress Service|\n|HCF|Healthcare Facility|\n|HLO|Higher Level Objective|\n|IGWSC|Intergovernmental Water Sector Coordination|\n|IPF|Investment Project Financing|\n|IRR|Internal Rate of Return|\n|IVA|Independent Verification Agent|\n|KNAP|Kenya National Adaptation Plan|\n|KPHC|Kenya Population and Housing Census|\n|KPI|Key Performance Indicator|\n|K-WASH|Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program|\n|M&E|Monitoring and Evaluation|\n|MDAs|Ministries, Departments, and Agencies|\n|MHM|Menstrual Hygiene Management|\n|MoE|Ministry of Education|\n|MoH|Ministry of Health|\n|MoWSI|Ministry of Water, Sanitation, and Irrigation|\n|MTP|Medium-Term Plan|\n|NAWASIP|National Water and Sanitation Investment Program|\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual Performance Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8695047497749329,
+ "start": 25,
+ "end": 28
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental and Social Systems Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8140556216239929,
+ "start": 167,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9569228887557983,
+ "start": 210,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|NRW|Non-Revenue Water|\n|---|---|\n|NT|National Treasury|\n|O&M|Operation and Maintenance|\n|OCCR|Operational Cost Coverage Ratio|\n|OD|Open Defecation|\n|ODF|Open Defecation Free|\n|PAP|Program Action Plan|\n|PCM|Private Capital Mobilization|\n|PDO|Program Development Objective|\n|PFM|Public Financial Management|\n|PforR|Program-for-Results|\n|PIAP|Performance Improvement Action Plan|\n|PIR|Policy, Institutional, and Regulatory|\n|PIU|Program Implementation Unit|\n|PMU|Program Management Unit|\n|POM|Program Operations Manual|\n|PSC|Program Steering Committee|\n|PTC|Program Technical Committee|\n|RA|Results Area|\n|RVR|Results Verification Report|\n|SDGs|Sustainable Development Goals|\n|SDWS|State Department for Water and Sanitation|\n|SRM|Social Risk Management|\n|TA|Technical Assistance|\n|UNHCR|United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees|\n|WASH|Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene|\n|WASREB|Water Services and Regulatory Board|\n|WHR|Window for Host Communities and Refugees|\n|WSIGCF|Water Sector Intergovernmental Sector Coordination Framework|\n|WSP|Water Service Provider|\n|WSS|Water and Sanitation Services|\n|Water Fund|Water Sector Trust Fund|\n|WWDA|Water Works Development Agency|\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n**DATASHEET ....................................................................................................................................... 1**\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 8**\n\n\nA. Country Context ....................................................................................................................................... 8\n\n\nB. Sectoral (or Multi-Sectoral) and Institutional Context ............................................................................. 9\n\n\nC. Relationship to the CPS and Rationale for Use of Instrument ............................................................... 11\n\n\n**II.** **PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 12**\n\n\nA. Government Program............................................................................................................................. 12\n\n\nB. Theory of Change ................................................................................................................................... 13\n\n\nC. PforR Program Scope .............................................................................................................................. 15\n\n\nD. Program Development Objective(s) (PDO) and PDO Level Results Indicators ...................................... 17\n\n\nE. Disbursement Linked Indicators and Verification Protocols .................................................................. 18\n\n\n**III. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................. 22**\n\n\nA. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements .................................................................................. 22\n\n\nB. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 23\n\n\nC. Disbursement Arrangements ................................................................................................................. 23\n\n\nD. Capacity Building .................................................................................................................................... 24\n\n\n**IV. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 24**\n\n\nA. Technical (including program economic evaluation) ............................................................................. 24\n\n\nB. Fiduciary 27\n\n\nC. Environmental and Social ....................................................................................................................... 28\n\n\nD. Private Capital Facilitation, Gender, and Citizen Engagement .............................................................. 30\n\n\n**V.** **GRIEVANCE REDRESS SERVICE .................................................................................................. 31**\n\n\n**VI. KEY RISKS 31**\n\n\n**ANNEX 1. RESULTS FRAMEWORK MATRIX ........................................................................................ 34**\n\n\n**ANNEX 2. DISBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND VERIFICATION PROTOCOL ..................................... 49**\n\n\n**ANNEX 3. PROGRAM ACTION PLAN .................................................................................................. 54**\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Project Beneficiary(ies)
Kenya|Operation Name
Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Operation ID
P179012|Financing Instrument
Program-for-Results
Financing (PforR)|Does this operation have an IPF
component?
Yes|Environmental and Social Risk
Classification (IPF Component)
Substantial|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Financing & Implementation Modalities|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|[ ] Multiphase Programmatic Approach (MPA)|[ ] Fragile State(s)|\n|[ ] Contingent Emergency Response Component (CERC)|[✓] Fragile within a non-fragile Country|\n|[ ] Small State(s)|[ ] Conflict|\n|[ ] Alternative Procurement Arrangements (APA)|[ ] Responding to Natural or Man-made Disaster|\n|[ ] Hands-on Expanded Implementation Support (HEIS)||\n\n\n|Expected Approval Date
20-Dec-2023|Expected Closing Date
30-Jun-2030|\n|---|---|\n|Bank/IFC Collaboration
No|
|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 1 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|SUMMARY|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**Government program Cost**|**8,500.00**|\n|**Total Operation Cost**|**458.00**|\n|Total Program Cost|438.00|\n|IPF Component|20.00|\n|**Total Financing**|**458.00**|\n|**Financing Gap**|**0.00**|\n\n\n|World Bank Group Financing|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|International Development Association (IDA)|250.00|\n|IDA Credit|200.00|\n|IDA Grant|50.00|\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 2 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n|Unguaranteed Commercial Financing|8.00|\n|---|---|\n|Counterpart Funding|200.00|\n|Borrower/Recipient|200.00|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Credit Amount|Grant Amount|SML Amount|Guarantee
Amount|Total Amount|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Window for Host
Communities and
Refugees (WHR)|0.00|50.00|0.00|0.00|50.00|\n|National
Performance-Based
Allocations (PBA)|200.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|200.00|\n|**Total**|**200.00**|**50.00**|**0.00**|**0.00**|**250.00**|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|WB Fiscal
Year|2024|2025|2026|2027|2028|2029|2030|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Annual**|1.26|17.38|27.62|48.26|57.99|57.66|39.83|\n|**Cumulative**|1.26|18.64|46.26|94.53|152.51|210.18|250.00|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 3 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Legal Operational Policies|Triggered?|\n|---|---|\n|Projects on International Waterways OP 7.50|Yes|\n|Projects in Disputed Area OP 7.60|No|\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 4 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**Environmental and Social Standards Relevance Given its Context at the Time of Appraisal**\n\n\n|E & S Standards|Relevance|\n|---|---|\n|ESS 1: Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and
Impacts|Relevant|\n|ESS 10: Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure|Relevant|\n|ESS 2: Labor and Working Conditions|Relevant|\n|ESS 3: Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention and Management|Relevant|\n|ESS 4: Community Health and Safety|Relevant|\n|ESS 5: Land Acquisition, Restrictions on Land Use and Involuntary Resettlement|Relevant|\n|ESS 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural
Resources|Relevant|\n|ESS 7: Indigenous Peoples/Sub-Saharan African Historically Underserved
Traditional Local Communities|Relevant|\n|ESS 8: Cultural Heritage|Relevant|\n|ESS 9: Financial Intermediaries|Not Currently Relevant|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 5 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Type|Citation|Description|Financing Source|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Effectiveness|Article V|The Association is satisfied
that the Recipient has
maintained an adequate|IBRD/IDA|\n\n\n\nPage 6 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|refugee protection
framework.|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Effectiveness|Article V|The Recipient has
established the Program
Management Unit (PMU)
with composition,
resources and terms of
reference satisfactory to
the Association, and has
recruited/deployed to the
PMU, a Program
coordinator, a
procurement specialist, an
accountant, an internal
auditor, an environmental
specialist, a social
specialist, a monitoring and
evaluation specialist - all
with qualifications,
experience and under
terms of reference
satisfactory to the
Association.|IBRD/IDA|\n|Effectiveness|Article V|The Recipient has prepared
and adopted the
Operations Manual in form
and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IBRD/IDA|\n\n\n\nPage 7 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n\n**A. Country Context**\n\n\n1. **Over the last 20 years, Kenya has achieved strong development gains, becoming a lower-middle-income country**\n**with a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of US$2,006.** [1] Kenya is one of the largest economies in Africa and the first\nin East Africa. Kenya’s economy staged a remarkable recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. With a GDP growth at 4.8\npercent in 2022, economic performance softened after the strong rebound from the COVID-19 crisis at 7.5 percent in\n2021. Even though the economy faced challenging global financial conditions, fuel, and food price shocks, and a historic\ndrought that affected the economy, especially in the second half of 2022, Kenya’s medium-term growth remains strong.\nThe national poverty rate fell from 46.7 percent in 2005/2006 to 33.6 percent in 2019 [2] . The onset of COVID-19 was\nassociated with an increase in the poverty rate to 42.9 percent in 2020, but this declined to 38.6 percent in 2021 when\nrecovery from the pandemic began. There are significant disparities between counties, with a higher incidence of poverty\nin the north and northeastern counties. Female-headed households tend to have a higher poverty headcount rate (38.8\npercent in 2021, compared to 32.7 percent for their male counterparts). The poverty rate increases to 42.5 percent among\nrural female-headed households, compared to 35.5 percent for rural male-headed households.\n\n\n2. **The Government of Kenya (GoK) aims for the country to reach middle-income industrialized status—providing**\n**a high quality of life to all citizens, including universal access to water supply and sanitation services—by 2030.** This\nambition is guided by the Kenya Vision 2030, the country’s long-term development blueprint, which is aligned with the\nUN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implemented through successive five-year medium-term plans (MTPs).\nUnder the new MTP 2023–26, the Government has prioritized implementation of policies and structural reforms and has\nincreased investments in five sectors [3] envisaged to have the largest impact and links to the economy as well as on\nhousehold welfare—collectively under the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA) (2022–2027). The BETA\nprioritizes water as a critical enabling factor for economic transformation with a specific strategy of increasing both storage\nthrough dams and access to water and sanitation at the household level, with an emphasis on rural areas, to close the\nurban-rural access gap.\n\n\n3. **Kenya is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, with significant impacts on economic growth.** Over\nthe past 50 years, changes in temperature and rainfall patterns have resulted in more frequent weather-related disasters\nsuch as floods, droughts, and landslides with a profound impact on Kenya’s economy and people’s well-being. Each\ndrought event affected 4.8 million people on average, and in 2017, 3.4 million Kenyans were classified as food insecure\ndue to droughts [4] . Further, warming in Kenya and in the rest of continental Africa is projected to be greater than the global\nmean (2.8 [o] C) during the twenty-first century, [5] meaning that more climate change-exacerbated floods and droughts are\nexpected.\n\n\n4. **For more than three decades, Kenya has been home to a significant population of refugees and asylum seekers.**\nThere are 636,024 refugees and asylum seekers in the country, the majority of whom live in two designated refugee camps\n\n\n1 World Bank. 2020. GDP per Capita Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=KE.\n[2 Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. 2023. Kenya Poverty Report-2021. https://www.knbs.or.ke/download/the-kenya-poverty-report-2021/](https://www.knbs.or.ke/download/the-kenya-poverty-report-2021/)\n3 Agricultural transformation, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), Housing and Settlement, Healthcare and Digital Superhighway and\nCreative Industry.\n4 Government of Kenya.2018. National Climate Change Action Plan (Kenya): 2018-2022.\n5 IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the\nIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University\nPress, Cambridge, UK, 976pp.\n\n\nPage 8 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.8117905855178833,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9528487920761108,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2022",
+ "confidence": 0.672075629234314,
+ "start": 124,
+ "end": 125
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2005/",
+ "confidence": 0.541479766368866,
+ "start": 198,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national poverty rate",
+ "confidence": 0.8223289251327515,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9317705035209656,
+ "start": 179,
+ "end": 180
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2005/2006",
+ "confidence": 0.9250124096870422,
+ "start": 198,
+ "end": 201
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Female-headed households",
+ "confidence": 0.8530979156494141,
+ "start": 270,
+ "end": 272
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda",
+ "confidence": 0.6928479075431824,
+ "start": 465,
+ "end": 469
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8911575675010681,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 530
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7016409039497375,
+ "start": 605,
+ "end": 606
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Kenyans",
+ "confidence": 0.7640525698661804,
+ "start": 611,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "GDP per Capita Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9907195568084717,
+ "start": 728,
+ "end": 732
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9940816760063171,
+ "start": 723,
+ "end": 725
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.891577959060669,
+ "start": 628,
+ "end": 629
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2020",
+ "confidence": 0.9149743318557739,
+ "start": 726,
+ "end": 727
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees and asylum seekers",
+ "confidence": 0.9577555060386658,
+ "start": 692,
+ "end": 696
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Poverty Report-2021",
+ "confidence": 0.7424646019935608,
+ "start": 744,
+ "end": 747
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Kenya National Bureau of Statistics",
+ "confidence": 0.8539115786552429,
+ "start": 736,
+ "end": 741
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.99009108543396,
+ "start": 628,
+ "end": 629
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2023",
+ "confidence": 0.6821406483650208,
+ "start": 742,
+ "end": 743
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National Climate Change Action Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.9803834557533264,
+ "start": 782,
+ "end": 787
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Government of Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5987028479576111,
+ "start": 776,
+ "end": 779
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9653201699256897,
+ "start": 778,
+ "end": 779
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2018",
+ "confidence": 0.794994592666626,
+ "start": 780,
+ "end": 781
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2018-2022",
+ "confidence": 0.9879952073097229,
+ "start": 791,
+ "end": 792
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n—with 269,545 in Dadaab Camp in Garissa County and 270,273 in Kakuma Camp and Kalobeyei Settlement in Turkana\nCounty. [6 ] The two camps are under the management of the GoK’s Department of Refugee Services (DRS), with support\nfrom the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and humanitarian partners. The inflow of refugees has\nsignificantly changed the population, spatial, and social dynamics of host counties. [7] The GoK has demonstrated its\ncommitment to the Global Compact on Refugees by enacting the Refugees Act of 2021, which grants refugees more rights\nand protections, and by drafting the Shirika [8] plan, which seeks to create more integrated settlements where refugees can\nlive, access social services, and work alongside Kenyans.\n\n\n**B. Sectoral (or Multi-Sectoral) and Institutional Context**\n\n\n5. **Lack of water is a growing binding constraint for Kenya’s development: the country is water-scarce with**\n**variable, low, and declining freshwater resources against a fast-rising demand.** Kenya’s renewable freshwater per capita\navailability has halved in the past 30 years. Decades of underinvestment in water infrastructure and watershed protection\nmeans that Kenya’s water withdrawal is less than 15 percent of its renewable resources and its dam storage capacity is\nonly about 103m [3] per capita, well below the African average of 876m [3] per capita. [9] Furthermore, the rising population,\neconomic growth, and urbanization, combined with climate change impacts, place increasing pressure on and cause\nconflict over poorly developed water resources.\n\n\n6. **Access to potable water and sanitation services (WSS) in Kenya lags behind that of other public services within**\n**the country and suffers from significant rural-urban disparities.** Twice as many Kenyans have access to electricity, and 20\npercent more have access to mobile phones than to basic sanitation. [10] Furthermore, while 91 percent of the urban\npopulation has access to improved water services and 58 percent to piped water, only 63 percent of the rural population\nhas access to improved water services and only 19 percent to piped water. The inequalities are similar for sanitation\nservices where 93 percent of urban households have access to improved sanitation services compared to 75 percent in\nrural areas. Disparities also exist across counties. Nairobi County has near universal access to improved WSS, while in 10\ncounties, less than 50 percent of households have access to improved water. Additionally, almost 83 percent of all open\ndefecation (OD) occurs in 15 counties, mainly in the northern and northeastern regions. [11]\n\n\n7. **Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services in public schools and health facilities in Kenya remains**\n**inadequate, undermining human capital developmental outcomes.** The situation in the 32,038 formal public schools in\nKenya is dire: about 15,000 children are in schools without any WASH facilities available to them, 0.3 million without\navailable water, and another 0.3 million without access to a sanitation facility. [12] There are about 130,000 children living\nwith disabilities in formal public schools, requiring special consideration for access to WASH facilities. Poor access to\nWASH, and specifically to menstrual hygiene management (MHM) services, has been identified as one of the significant\nbarriers preventing girls from attending and completing school. [13] A sampling of healthcare facilities (HCFs) indicated a\n\n\n[6 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (July 2023) https://www.unhcr.org/ke/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/08/Kenya-](https://www.unhcr.org/ke/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/08/Kenya-Statistics-Package-31-July-2023-DIMA.pdf)\n[Statistics-Package-31-July-2023-DIMA.pdf.](https://www.unhcr.org/ke/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/08/Kenya-Statistics-Package-31-July-2023-DIMA.pdf)\n7 For a map, see https://data2.unhcr.org/en/country/ken.\n8 Socioeconomic Hubs for Integrated Refugee Inclusion in Kenya.\n9 UN University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (2022) Water Security in Africa: A Preliminary Assessment, Issue 13\nhttps://inweh.unu.edu/water-security-in-africa-a-preliminary-assessment/\n[10 Kenya Population and Housing Census (2019). https://www.knbs.or.ke/publications/.](https://www.knbs.or.ke/publications/)\n11 Kenya Population and Housing Census (2019). https://www.knbs.or.ke/publications/.\n12 Ministry of Education. 2020. _WASH in Schools Situation Analysis_ . Unpublished draft.\n13 Alexander, Kelly T., et al. 2014. “Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Conditions in Kenyan Rural Schools: Are Schools Meeting the Needs of\nMenstruating Girls?” _Water_ 6 (5): 1453–1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6051453.\n\n\nPage 9 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.6535935997962952,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6454545855522156,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2021",
+ "confidence": 0.7335312366485596,
+ "start": 123,
+ "end": 124
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.699521541595459,
+ "start": 75,
+ "end": 76
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Access to potable water and sanitation services",
+ "confidence": 0.9260867834091187,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 334
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9471178650856018,
+ "start": 338,
+ "end": 339
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Kenyans",
+ "confidence": 0.5368838906288147,
+ "start": 365,
+ "end": 366
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Population and Housing Census",
+ "confidence": 0.9994882345199585,
+ "start": 751,
+ "end": 756
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9064579010009766,
+ "start": 751,
+ "end": 752
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2019",
+ "confidence": 0.9197328090667725,
+ "start": 757,
+ "end": 758
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2019",
+ "confidence": 0.7183681130409241,
+ "start": 757,
+ "end": 758
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nsimilar situation: over half of those sampled had no access to clean water or adequate hand hygiene stations, and at least\n20 patients shared one toilet.\n\n\n8. **WSS access rates in the two major refugee-hosting counties of Turkana and Garissa lag behind national average.**\nAccess to improved water is at 57 percent in Garissa and 52 percent in Turkana County, while access to improved sanitation\nis at 17 percent in Garissa and 7 percent in Turkana. The two counties have high levels of OD, with Garissa at 36.2 percent\nand Turkana at 68.1 percent. [14] In addition, while water access rates are higher in the camps than for the host communities,\nthere are problems of service quality, with low volumes per capita, high leakages, and long lines at the water kiosks. [15]\nAccess to sanitation services is low and weak operational and financial sustainability of WSS poses a significant public\nhealth risk in the congested camps.\n\n\n9. **Under Kenya’s devolved system of government, responsibility for water sector development and service**\n**provision is shared between the national and county governments.** Both levels of government have an obligation to\nincrease people’s access to WSS. The national government is responsible for water sector policy leadership, regulation,\nthe provision of bulk infrastructure that serves more than one county, and financial support to county governments to\nachieve sectoral objectives. The county governments are responsible for service provision.\n\n\n10. **Water sector reforms have accelerated in recent years, but there are still implementation challenges** **stymieing**\n**full realization of the benefits of devolved services delivery.** Kenya’s devolved system is characterized by high levels of\npolitical, administrative, and fiscal autonomy and discretion. The new Water Policy and water resources management,\nwater and sanitation services, and irrigation regulations passed in 2022 are important milestones in advancing the\ndevolved governance system started with the 2010 Constitution and the 2016 Water Act. Establishment of a funding\nmechanism that incentivizes performance at the county level and operationalization of an intergovernmental coordination\nframework are pending critical milestones for achieving universal WSS access.\n\n\n11. **Chronic inefficiencies in the operation of water service providers (WSPs), coupled with gaps in the governance**\n**of rural water service provision necessitate substantial subsidies for operation and maintenance (O&M), at the expense**\n**of service expansion.** In line with the 2016 Water Act, WSS provision is devolved to the counties who are the owners of\nWSPs. [16] On average, Kenyan water utilities lose about US$90 million annually due to low operational efficiencies. [17] Nonrevenue water (NRW) has stagnated at a national average of 45 percent over the past decade, while energy costs have\nremained high, reaching as high as 50 percent of total operating costs for some WSPs. This has had a negative impact on\nthe financial stability and capacity of WSPs to expand their services. Further, COVID-19 imposed significant financial\nconstraints on WSPs. [18]\n\n\n12. **Service gaps and inefficiencies are larger in rural areas.** Most rural water supply systems fall outside the\njurisdiction of licensed WSPs. Such schemes are operated by unregulated community groups, with tariffs that do not\nreflect actual costs and revenues that are not well monitored. The result is unreliable service provision and frequent nonfunctionality of these schemes. A more sustainable operation and financing model for rural WSPs is required to improve\ntheir efficiency and enable them to increase operating cost coverage, thus expanding services to more rural households.\n\n\n14 Kenya Population and Housing Census (2019).\n15 The average water volume per capita in Kakuma camp is 12.75 litres per capita per day, decreasing to only 6 litres per day in Kalobeyei.\nCompared to refugees, the host communities have even lower access levels.\n16 There are about 87 public and three privately owned WSPs that are licensed and regulated by WASREB.\n17 WASREB. 2022. _A Performance Report of Kenya’s Water Services Sector - 2020/21_ .\n18 For instance, revenues declined by 40 percent between February and April 2020.\n\n\nPage 10 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSS",
+ "confidence": 0.8257759809494019,
+ "start": 51,
+ "end": 52
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSS",
+ "confidence": 0.6112311482429504,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7338643074035645,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Population and Housing Census",
+ "confidence": 0.9730484485626221,
+ "start": 707,
+ "end": 712
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7796096205711365,
+ "start": 707,
+ "end": 708
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2019",
+ "confidence": 0.994042694568634,
+ "start": 713,
+ "end": 714
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Performance Report",
+ "confidence": 0.8057062029838562,
+ "start": 784,
+ "end": 786
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Report",
+ "confidence": 0.7539283037185669,
+ "start": 785,
+ "end": 786
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WASREB",
+ "confidence": 0.6710347533226013,
+ "start": 779,
+ "end": 780
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9032341837882996,
+ "start": 787,
+ "end": 788
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2022",
+ "confidence": 0.9849440455436707,
+ "start": 781,
+ "end": 782
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n13. **Multiple use needs in rural systems present a reality to be addressed technically and institutionally to ensure**\n**relevance, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of WSS investments.** Most rural households will use available domestic\nwater supply systems for other productive activities, including for home gardens and livestock (multiple water\nuse/WASH+). As these uses are often overlooked in technical and institutional setups, the lack of an authorizing\nenvironment can lead to overuse, low-cost recovery, breakdowns, or restrictions on uses that directly contribute to\nimproving human capital (for example, nutrition) and climate resilience needs. [19] In Kenya, it has been assessed that\ninclusion of WASH+ considerations typically result in high additional and pro-poor benefits, with good cost recovery. [20] To\naddress these challenges, the GoK has approved the National Water and Sanitation Investment Program (NAWASIP)\ndescribed under section II. Program Description, A. Government Program.\n\n\n**C. Relationship to the CPS and Rationale for Use of Instrument**\n\n\n14. **The operation is aligned with the World Bank’s Country Partnership Framework (CPF) for Kenya (FY23–FY28,**\n**Report No.172255-KE, discussed by the Board in November 2022).** **[ 21]** The operation supports meeting the CPF’s goal “to\nsupport Kenya’s transformation into a middle-income economy that achieves inclusivity and resilience” as well as the\nachievement of Higher Level Objective 1 (HLO1) on faster and more equitable labor, productivity, and income growth;\nHLO2 on greater equity in service delivery outcomes; and HLO3 on greater resilience and sustainability of Kenya’s natural\ncapital, through contributing to CPF Objectives 4, 5, 6, and 7 on shrinking disparities in learning and health outcomes;\nextending infrastructure services to the last mile; increasing household resilience to, and national preparedness for,\nshocks; and reducing Kenya’s water insecurity, respectively. The operation aligns with World Bank’s support to implement\nKenya’s Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework under Objective 6 of the CPF. It also aligns with the World Bank\nEvolution and new mission to end extreme poverty and boost shared prosperity on a livable plant, as it promotes\nsustainability, inclusion, and resilience. Additionally, it is aligned to the World Bank Group’s Gender Equality Strategy\n(2016-2023) Objective 1 and 4 on Improving Human Endowment and Enhancing Women’s Voice and Agency respectively,\nand to Africa East Regional commitment to accelerate universal access to safely managed WSS in the region by\ninvestments in improved WSS.\n\n\n15. **The Program for Results (PforR) instrument is increasingly used in World Bank financed operations in Kenya,**\n**which has active PforR lending operations in the urban, energy, social, and other sectors** . Lessons from Vietnam, Egypt,\nMexico, and Tanzania indicate that a results-based approach can be effective in creating new incentive frameworks for\nlocal institutions and service providers to deliver better quality and lasting services to the population and in\ninstitutionalizing good practices. The PforR is a highly appropriate instrument to spur results while maintaining the\nmomentum of the sector reforms in Kenya and provide support to drive achievement of the NAWASIP objectives.\n\n\n16. **Investment Project Financing (IPF) has been identified as the best instrument for providing technical capacity**\n**strengthening and PforR delivery support.** The World Bank’s technical, environmental, and fiduciary assessments\nidentified some technical and institutional capacity weaknesses in the GoK systems. A key lesson that has emerged from\nglobal and national PforR experience is that the results-based approach is more effective and can be implemented more\nefficiently when complemented by substantial technical assistance (TA) to support client to address weaknesses in\nsystems, capabilities, and procedures.\n\n\n19 Van Koppen, et al. 2009. _Climbing the Water Ladder: Multiple-Use Water Services for Poverty Reduction_ . International Water and Sanitation\nCentre and International Water Management Institute.\n20 Hall and Davis. 2012. _Productive Use of Domestic Rural Water Systems: The Kenya Case._\n21 https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents\n[reports/documentdetail/099421512052241562/secbos01bdb49b00208e1f0d132ef1fbe94](https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099421512052241562/secbos01bdb49b00208e1f0d132ef1fbe94)\n\n\nPage 11 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5382912158966064,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9082444906234741,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural households",
+ "confidence": 0.9056161046028137,
+ "start": 56,
+ "end": 58
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National Water and Sanitation Investment Program",
+ "confidence": 0.7532160878181458,
+ "start": 178,
+ "end": 184
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9832980632781982,
+ "start": 237,
+ "end": 238
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2022",
+ "confidence": 0.8129306435585022,
+ "start": 258,
+ "end": 259
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "achievement of Higher Level Objective 1",
+ "confidence": 0.600301206111908,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 306
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8694379925727844,
+ "start": 339,
+ "end": 340
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Gender Equality Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.5569979548454285,
+ "start": 468,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PforR",
+ "confidence": 0.5994009375572205,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 609
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6690578460693359,
+ "start": 626,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "GoK systems",
+ "confidence": 0.9035492539405823,
+ "start": 692,
+ "end": 694
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "technical, environmental, and fiduciary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.6817086338996887,
+ "start": 676,
+ "end": 683
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.7894104719161987,
+ "start": 672,
+ "end": 674
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6398120522499084,
+ "start": 626,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n17. **The World Bank, following consultation with the UNHCR, confirms that the protection framework for refugees** **[22]**\n**continues to be adequate in Kenya for accessing financing from the IDA20 Window for Host Communities and Refugees**\n**(WHR).** Kenya’s treatment of refugees is governed by the Refugees Act of 2021 and is largely in line with international and\nregional refugee protection standards and Kenya’s commitments under the Global Compact on Refugees. It provides\nprotection against refoulement, and outlines asylum procedures, including registration, documentation, and refugee\nstatus determination. The Act recognizes the rights of refugees to participate in economic and social development and\nsupports refugee inclusion in development planning. Refugee Regulations are being developed in consultation with\nstakeholders to provide detailed procedures for implementation of the Refugees Act 2021.\n\n\n**II.** **PROGRAM DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**A. Government Program**\n\n\n18. **The Government program, NAWASIP, adopted by the GoK in March 2023, aims to accelerate achievement of**\n**universal access to WSS by 2030.** The program, to be implemented at a cost of KSh 995 billion (US$8.5 billion) from 2023\nto 2030, is the first jointly developed intergovernmental WSS sector investment plan. NAWASIP’s overall objective is to\naccelerate the achievement of universal access to safe water supply and improved sanitation services in Kenya’s 47\ncounties by 2030 in an affordable, equitable, and sustainable manner. In addition to increasing access to physical\ninfrastructure, the program includes a targeted program of investments on enhancing the sector’s policy and institutional\nefficiency including improving the performance of WSPs.\n\n\n19. **The NAWASIP has five components** . Component 1: Storage Infrastructure and Bulk Water Transmission Systems\n(US$1 billion); Component 2: Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Services (US$5 billion); and Component 3: Rural Water\nSupply and Sanitation Services (US$1.7 billion) are primarily focused on improving and expanding infrastructure for\nreliable, sustainable, and affordable safe water supply and sanitation services to meet the 2030 universal access targets;\nComponent 4: Support for Sector Efficiency Improvement and Policy Reforms Program (US$0.5 billion) and Component 5:\nProgram Coordination, Capacity Building and Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) (US$0.3 billion) are focused on enhancing\nsector efficiency and service delivery capacity within the devolution framework.\n\n\n20. **The GoK has identified several financing sources for implementation of the NAWASIP.** Slightly more than half of\nthe cost of NAWASIP is expected to be financed through concessional lending. About one-third of NAWASIP is proposed\nto be structured as public-private partnerships, and the remaining portion of NAWASIP would be supported by donor\ngrants, domestic commercial finance, and national and county budget allocations. Through MTP 2023—2026, the GoK\nplans to allocate about US$200 million toward the implementation of Components 3, 4, and 5 of NAWASIP, which\nenvisages a results-based financing mechanism particularly for the county-level investments.\n\n\n21. **The Ministry of Water, Sanitation, and Irrigation (MoWSI) through the State Department for Water and**\n**Sanitation (SDWS) is coordinating NAWASIP’s implementation in partnership with respective county governments.** The\nState Department of Water and Sewerage Development in the MoWSI is responsible for overall coordination of the\nimplementation of NAWASIP. At the county level, NAWASIP is being implemented by county government water\ndepartments and their respective WSPs and at the national level, regional Water Works Development Agencies (WWDAs)\nfor bulk and cross-county WSS infrastructure, and the Water Sector Trust Fund (Water Fund) and Water Services and\n\n\n22 Based on UNHCR’s Kenya Refugee Protection Assessment Update No. 4 from July to December 2022.\n\n\nPage 12 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "protection framework for refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5437257885932922,
+ "start": 35,
+ "end": 39
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6495569944381714,
+ "start": 22,
+ "end": 25
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8798789978027344,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2021",
+ "confidence": 0.6907811760902405,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7675886750221252,
+ "start": 38,
+ "end": 39
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.5653426051139832,
+ "start": 344,
+ "end": 345
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2030",
+ "confidence": 0.5559345483779907,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 302
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2030",
+ "confidence": 0.5800343751907349,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 302
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NAWASIP",
+ "confidence": 0.7727734446525574,
+ "start": 514,
+ "end": 515
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NAWASIP",
+ "confidence": 0.7477596402168274,
+ "start": 601,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "results-based financing mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.7577754855155945,
+ "start": 606,
+ "end": 609
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.8982155323028564,
+ "start": 739,
+ "end": 740
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9005512595176697,
+ "start": 742,
+ "end": 743
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2022",
+ "confidence": 0.9647215604782104,
+ "start": 754,
+ "end": 755
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nRegulatory Board (WASREB) for other subcomponents. The WWDAs, in addition to the implementation of cross-county\nprojects, also provide on-demand TA to counties.\n\n\n22. **In line with the Refugees Act of 2021, the GoK is developing the Shirika Plan as the main roadmap and strategy**\n**toward the integrated settlement model for refugee management, away from a camp-based model.** The Shirika Plan\nwill provide a multisectoral plan that delineates development solutions that benefit both refugees and host communities\nthrough an integrated delivery approach. [23] WASH is one of the priority sectors outlined in the plan that this operation will\ndirectly support. Integrated socio-economic development plans [24] have also been prepared by the hosting Counties of\nTurkana and Garissa jointly with UNHCR and other humanitarian and development partners. The interventions proposed\nin these plans are aligned with those under NAWASIP and the Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (K-WASH),\nincluding the focus on reforms for promoting efficiency, sustainability, and resilience of WSS. They will also complement\nthe Second Kenya Urban Support Program (P177048), which is supporting the transition of refugee camps into integrated\nrefugee and host community municipal settlements.\n\n\n**B. Theory of Change**\n\n\n23. **Table 1 presents the Program’s Theory of Change (ToC).** The Program will support the Government’s objective\nunder NAWASIP to accelerate the achievement of universal access to safe water supply and improved sanitation services\nin Kenya’s 47 counties by 2030 in an affordable, equitable, and sustainable manner. First, to address the dual challenge of\nincreasing and sustaining access to improved rural water services, the Program will promote a sector-integrated approach\nwith incentives provided at the village/community, county, and national levels. Second, the Program will address rural\nsanitation challenges in an integrated and comprehensive manner through a multipronged approach both at the\nhousehold and community levels, comprising community-led total sanitation (CLTS), behavior change communication\n(BCC) campaigns, and sanitation marketing to eradicate OD in villages and move households up the sanitation ladder to\nimproved facilities, thus improving community-wide sanitation (CWS) status. Third, the Program focuses on improving the\ngovernance, accountability, operational efficiency, and financial performance of WSPs, to increase their creditworthiness\nand reduce their dependency on public subsidies for O&M, thus freeing up valuable resources to be directed to rural areas.\nWSPs will be incentivized to meet and exceed national standards for women’s employment and representation in\nleadership positions and community engagement, which will result in more inclusive and hence productive governance. [25]\nFinally, the Program will incentivize the reform of sector policy, improve coordination, and strengthen sector monitoring\nand reporting to ensure that sustainable rural WSS are provided. Holistically, the Program will address local flood and\ndrought risks and strengthen climate change adaptation and mitigation by improving climate resilience of water and\nsanitation schemes. The TA activities and reforms supported under the IPF component will further strengthen and\naccelerate the achievement of Program outcomes.\n\n\n23 The thematic pillars of the _Shirika plan_ include (a) system building, governance, policy, legal, and justice; (b) access to integrated services (such as,\nwater); (c) human capital and skills development; (d) natural resource management and climate change; (e) sustainable economic development; and\n(f) durable solutions and complementary pathways.\n24 In 2023, both Turkana and Garissa Counties launched multisectoral, multistakeholder socioeconomic development plans for refugees and host\ncommunity members. The Kalobeyei Integrated Socio-Economic Development Plan (KISEDP) was adopted in 2018 and updated in 2023 (KISEDP 2).\nThe Garissa Integrated Socio-Economic Development Plan was launched in September 2023. The local plans are part of the wider Shirika Plan lead\nby the national Government.\n25 Thompson, Kate, Kathleen O’Dell, Sameera Syed, Hannah Kemp, and Eva Vazquez. 2017. “Thirsty for Change: The Untapped Potential of Women\nin Urban Water Management.” _Deloitte Review_ 20: 154–167.\n\n\nPage 13 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**Table 1. Program Theory of Change**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Proposed Activities|Outputs|Short-Term Outcomes|Medium-Term
Outcomes/PDO|Long-Term
Outcomes|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable26 rural areas**|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable26 rural areas**|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable26 rural areas**|Increased
sustainable
access to
improved water
services for
climate
vulnerable rural
households, in
selected
counties,
including
refugees
hosting
counties.
Increased
sustainable
access to
improved
sanitation
services and
elimination of
open
defecation
providers in
selected
climate
vulnerable
counties,
including
refugee hosting
counties.
Improved
financial
performance of
WSPs in
selected
counties,
including
refugee hosting
counties|Universal
access to safe
water supply
and improved
sanitation
services in
Kenya’s 47
counties by
2030 in an
affordable,
equitable, and
sustainable
manner|\n|1.1 Prepare county-wide water and
sanitation strategy
1.2 Design and construct rural water supply
infrastructure
1.3 Establish professional service delivery
models|•
County water and sanitation
strategy and investment plan
approved**(DLI 1)**
•
Water supply schemes
constructed
•
Delivery models for O&M
adopted|•
Climate vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved water services**(DLI 2)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 3)**|•
Climate vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved water services**(DLI 2)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 3)**|•
Climate vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved water services**(DLI 2)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 3)**|\n|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services, and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services, and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services, and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services, and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services, and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural areas**|\n|2.1 Undertake sanitation & hygiene behavior
change communication/demand creation &
market-based sanitation activities at
community-level
2.2 Design and construct WASH facilities in
rural public Early Childhood Development
Centres (ECD) and primary schools and
healthcare facilities
2.3 Undertake Fecal sludge management|•
Improved sanitation facilities
constructed
•
WASH facilities in rural public ECD
and primary schools and HCFs
constructed
•
Fecal sludge safely emptied and
disposed|•
Climate-vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved sanitation services
**(DLI 4)**
•
Communities sustain open
defecation free status (ODF,
public ECD and primary schools
and HCFs have access to
adequate WASH facilities**(DLI 5)**|•
Climate-vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved sanitation services
**(DLI 4)**
•
Communities sustain open
defecation free status (ODF,
public ECD and primary schools
and HCFs have access to
adequate WASH facilities**(DLI 5)**|•
Climate-vulnerable rural
households have access to
improved sanitation services
**(DLI 4)**
•
Communities sustain open
defecation free status (ODF,
public ECD and primary schools
and HCFs have access to
adequate WASH facilities**(DLI 5)**|\n|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of WSPs in participating counties**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of WSPs in participating counties**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of WSPs in participating counties**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of WSPs in participating counties**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of WSPs in participating counties**|\n|3.1 WSPs undertake reforms to ensure full
compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements
3.2 Prepare WSP Performance Improvement
Action Plans (PIAPs)
3.3 Prepare prioritized investments in the
PIAPs|•
WSPs fully compliant with legal
and regulatory requirements for
good governance and downwards
accountability**(DLI6)**
•
PIAPs approved by WSP Board of
Directors**(DLI6)**
•
Prioritized investments in the
PIAPs implemented|•
Improved operating cost
coverage of WSPs**(DLI 7)**
•
Improved gender diversity in
WSP leadership positions27
•
WSPs leveraging additional
Private/commercial capital**(DLI**
**8)**|•
Improved operating cost
coverage of WSPs**(DLI 7)**
•
Improved gender diversity in
WSP leadership positions27
•
WSPs leveraging additional
Private/commercial capital**(DLI**
**8)**|•
Improved operating cost
coverage of WSPs**(DLI 7)**
•
Improved gender diversity in
WSP leadership positions27
•
WSPs leveraging additional
Private/commercial capital**(DLI**
**8)**|\n|**RA 4 - Improving Sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**RA 4 - Improving Sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**RA 4 - Improving Sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**RA 4 - Improving Sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**RA 4 - Improving Sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|\n|4.1 Design NAWASIP performance-based
fiscal transfer mechanism
4.2 Design national integrated WSS sub-
sector M&E system
4.3 Operationalize the Water Sector
Intergovernmental Sector Coordination
framework (WSIGCF)|•
NAWASIP performance-based
intergovernmental fiscal transfer
mechanism approved by Cabinet
**(DLI 9)**
•
WSIGCF implemented**(DLI 9)**
•
Annual water sector M&E report
prepared**(DLI 9)**
|•
Improved water sector
accountability, coordination,
capacity for service delivery and
results reporting|•
Improved water sector
accountability, coordination,
capacity for service delivery and
results reporting|•
Improved water sector
accountability, coordination,
capacity for service delivery and
results reporting|\n|**RA 5 - Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting communities**|**RA 5 - Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting communities**|**RA 5 - Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting communities**|**RA 5 - Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting communities**|**RA 5 - Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting communities**|\n|5.1 Design and construct water supply
schemes, and WASH facilities in public ECD
and primary schools and HCFs in refugee
camps and host communities
5.2 Undertake sanitation & hygiene behavior
change communication/demand creation &
market-based Sanitation activities in refugee
camps and host communities.
5.3 Prepare a transition roadmap for an
integrated water utility model|•
Water supply schemes, sanitation
facilities and WASH facilities
constructed HCFs and public
schools in refugee camps and
host communities28
•
Transition roadmap for
integrated water utility services
model implemented|•
Refugees and host community
households provided with
access to improved water and
sanitation services**(DLI 10)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 11)**
•
Communities sustain
community-wide sanitation
status (ODF, public ECD and
primary schools and HCFs)**(DLI**
**12)**
•
Sustainable integrated water
utility services provided|•
Refugees and host community
households provided with
access to improved water and
sanitation services**(DLI 10)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 11)**
•
Communities sustain
community-wide sanitation
status (ODF, public ECD and
primary schools and HCFs)**(DLI**
**12)**
•
Sustainable integrated water
utility services provided|•
Refugees and host community
households provided with
access to improved water and
sanitation services**(DLI 10)**
•
Sustainably functioning rural
water supply schemes**(DLI 11)**
•
Communities sustain
community-wide sanitation
status (ODF, public ECD and
primary schools and HCFs)**(DLI**
**12)**
•
Sustainable integrated water
utility services provided|\n\n\n\n26 Climate-vulnerable rural areas are areas that are prone to climate change-exacerbated floods and/or droughts. All rural areas under in this\nProgram are climate vulnerable.\n27 There is variance across WSPs for the type and number of leadership positions that will be accounted for in indicator data. Leadership positions\ninclude Board Members, managers, or chief Executive Officers.\n28 Refugee camp WASH facility designs will take into account the need for lighting and design to minimize the risk of gender-based violence.\n\n\nPage 14 of 57\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.7744390368461609,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.9014841318130493,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.5547218322753906,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7820529937744141,
+ "start": 665,
+ "end": 668
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8674094080924988,
+ "start": 603,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7068799734115601,
+ "start": 1255,
+ "end": 1256
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8214578032493591,
+ "start": 1210,
+ "end": 1211
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.5577489137649536,
+ "start": 1271,
+ "end": 1272
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8236090540885925,
+ "start": 1210,
+ "end": 1211
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6067839860916138,
+ "start": 1360,
+ "end": 1361
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual water sector M&E report",
+ "confidence": 0.8105720281600952,
+ "start": 1788,
+ "end": 1795
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "transition roadmap",
+ "confidence": 0.6802374720573425,
+ "start": 2057,
+ "end": 2059
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.5058652758598328,
+ "start": 2073,
+ "end": 2076
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Transition roadmap",
+ "confidence": 0.5274730920791626,
+ "start": 2112,
+ "end": 2114
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator data",
+ "confidence": 0.9342582821846008,
+ "start": 2546,
+ "end": 2548
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "28 Refugee camp WASH facility designs",
+ "confidence": 0.5631283521652222,
+ "start": 2562,
+ "end": 2568
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**C. PforR Program Scope**\n\n\n24. **Program boundaries.** The K-WASH will support NAWASIP in 19 counties over a six-year period (2024–2030). The\nProgram includes Components 3, 4, and 5 of NAWASIP in 19 counties focusing on increasing access to WSS in rural areas;\nimproving sector efficiency and reforms; and program coordination, capacity development, and M&E, respectively. [29] Since\nthe Program’s primary goal is to reduce the gap in WSS coverage between rural and urban areas, the selection of these\n19 counties prioritizes predominantly rural counties, using six criteria with varying weights assigned. [30] Excluded activities\nare those from Components 1 and 2 of NAWASIP, which include large bulk water and urban water and sanitation\ninfrastructure.\n\n\n25. **The K-WASH is a hybrid operation with a PforR and an IPF component.** The total cost of the operation is US$458\nmillion. The PforR cost is US$438 million which includes a Government contribution of US$200 million, an IDA financing of\nUS$230 million, of which US$40 million is an IDA grant from the WHR; a US$190 million is an IDA Credit, and US$8 million\nis to be leveraged from commercial financing by participating WSPs. The IPF component consists of US$20 million in IDA\nfunding, of which US$10 million is an IDA grant from the WHR, and US$10 million is an IDA credit to provide TA, capacity\ndevelopment, and program delivery support to key implementing agencies. Table 2 provides the financing breakdown.\n\n\n**Table 2. Proposed Financing Plan**\n\n|Source|Amount (US$, millions)|% of Total|\n|---|---|---|\n|** PforR**|**438**|**96**|\n|Counterpart Funding|200|—|\n|Commercial Financing|8|—|\n|International Development Association (IDA)|230|—|\n|IDA Credit|190|—|\n|IDA WHR Grant|40|—|\n|**IPF Component**|**20**|**4**|\n|IDA Credit|10|—|\n|IDA WHR Grant|10|—|\n|**Total IDA**|**250**|**54**|\n|**Total GoK Counterpart**|**200**|**44**|\n|**Total Commercial Financing**|**8 **|**2 **|\n|**Total Financing for the Operation**|**458 **|**100**|\n\n\n\n**PforR Component (US$190 million IDA; US$40 million IDA WHR; US$200 million GoK; US$8 Commercial Financing)**\n\n\n26. **The Program will finance results across five results areas (RAs) as follows:** **[31]**\n\n\n(a) **RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable rural**\n\n**areas.** This RA will first incentivize all the 19 participating counties to undertake specific policy, institutional,\n\n\n29 The 19 counties are Turkana, Samburu, West Pokot, Baringo, Garissa, Mandera, Tana River, Kwale, Makueni, Kitui, Tharaka Nithi, Kirinyaga,\nMurang’a, Narok, Migori, Kericho, Vihiga, Bomet, and Nandi.\n30 The weights assigned to these six were (a) Marginalization - 2, (b) arid and semi-arid lands (ASAL) counties - 1, (c) Population density - 1.5, (d)\nAccess to clean water -2.5, (e) Open Defecation level - 2 for those with > 50 percent, and (f) revenue allocation ratio - 1. The highest-scoring counties\nper region based on the nine regions mapped along water basins were prioritized and a final list of 17 counties was selected. The two refugee-hosting\ncounties of Garissa and Turkana were added, bringing the total number of priority counties to 19.\n31 High-risk investments with significant adverse impacts on the environment or people, for example, large dams or resettlements affecting over 200\npeople, are not financed under K-WASH.\n\n\nPage 15 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nand regulatory (PIR) reforms, primarily approval of a long-term County Water and Sanitation Strategy and\nInvestment Plan (CWSS&IP) [32] and investment roadmap. It will then finance the expansion of access to\nimproved water services for populations living in rural areas of the 17 participating non-refugee hosting\ncounties through the construction of new water supply schemes and the rehabilitation and expansion of\nexisting schemes. The sustainability of these schemes will be ensured through sustainable and accountable\nprofessional models for O&M services. [33] The water schemes constructed through the Program will be\ndesigned to meet set quality standards, consider multiple water uses (WASH+: for livestock, farmer-led\nirrigation, and other productive uses to support livelihoods) to the extent required, and be climate resilient.\n\n\n(b) **RA 2: Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation in**\n\n**climate-vulnerable rural areas.** This RA will finance increased access to improved sanitation and hygiene\nfacilities for rural households, public ECD and primary schools, and HCFs in the 17 participating non-refugee\nhosting counties. This will be accomplished through CLTS, sanitation marketing, and addressing of\ncommunity-specific behavioral barriers to a sustained social norm of not practicing OD, as well as the\nprovision of adequate menstrual health and hygiene-friendly and disabilities-accessible [34] WASH facilities for\nhouseholds and in public ECD and primary schools and HCFs.\n\n\n(c) **RA 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties.** This RA will\nprovide incentives for county governments and county-owned WSPs in the 19 participating counties to\nachieve full regulatory compliance, good corporate governance and autonomous operation of WSPs,\nprogressive improvement in operational efficiency, and financial performance and as a result of these\nimprovements in the WSP’s enabling environment and creditworthiness, leverage public funds to secure\nprivate capital for WSS expansion. Through a blended financing model with commercial banks, the RA will\nalso provide matching funds to WSPs for bankable projects that contribute to an increase in their operational\ncost coverage ratio (OCCR).\n\n\n(d) **RA 4: Improving sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management.** This\n\nRA aims to improve the institutional, policy, and regulatory framework to increase public and private\ninvestment for WSS in Kenya by incentivizing the implementation of a performance-based\nintergovernmental financing mechanism (with integrated indicators on downward accountability to\ncitizens/consumers based on active WASREB key performance indicators [KPIs]), operationalizing the\nintergovernmental water sector coordination framework to improve collaboration between national and\ncounty governments, and implementing an annual water sector performance reporting system that is\naligned with the SDGs. This is intended to improve the capacity of national and county governments to jointly\nmonitor and fully implement NAWASIP. These improvements will also directly improve the creditworthiness\nand financial viability of the WSP’s and the regulatory environment to enhance private sector financing in\nthe water and sanitation sector.\n\n\n(e) **RA 5: Improving integrated WASH services delivery for refugees and host communities.** This RA will\n\nincentivize, through WHR funding, integrated access to WASH services for households, public ECD and\nprimary schools, and health care facilities to facilitate the transition of water services to a development-led\ncounty-focused management model as part of the broader transition of refugee camps into integrated host\n\n\n32 The preparation of the CWSS&IP will be linked with the statutory County Integrated Development Plan and harmonized with other county level\nWSS or water resources management strategies/plans including climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.\n33 As part of the PIR reforms embedded in the CWSS&IP, the county will be incentivized to adopt a predictable model for the provision of\nprofessionalized O&M service delivery.\n34 World Bank. 2017. _Including Persons with Disabilities in Water Sector Operations: A Guidance Note (English)_ . World Bank Group.\n\n\nPage 16 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\ncommunity and refugee settlements in Garissa and Turkana Counties. Priority will also be given to incentivize\nthe adoption of an integrated refugees-host community water utility services model in refugee-hosting\nmunicipalities.\n\n\n**IPF Component (US$20 million IDA including US$10 million WHR)**\n\n\n27. **The IPF will provide TA and capacity-building activities for the implementing agencies and support for sector**\n**monitoring and reporting and refugee policy and coordination.** The SDWS will be supported to revise the WSS\nInfrastructure Design Manual, strengthen the capacity of participating counties, and enhance design and construction\nquality supervision. This will include specific assistance to the counties of Turkana and Garissa; DRS; and under DRS, the\nUNHCR, for the remodeling and planning of WASH infrastructure for the refugee camps and transition to an integrated\nwater utility services model. This will include supporting coordination between refugee stakeholders and transition\nmonitoring. Capacity-building activities will also include training counties on climate-resilient and universal access design\nand construction of water supply and sanitation infrastructure, standardizing WASH facilities for schools and HCFs\nincluding meeting standards for disability and MHM-inclusive design standards, and launching a BCC campaign and\naddressing the gender gaps in women’s employment in leadership positions. [35] WASREB and Water Fund will receive\nsupport to enhance their mandates in assisting WSPs to achieve regulatory and good governance compliance (including\nWASREB and country-prescribed mechanisms for citizen engagement), developing high-quality PIAPs and bankable\nprojects for commercial financing, and leveraging private financing. The support for PIAPs will have a direct and positive\nimpact on the financial health of the service providers and ultimately their creditworthiness. The IPF will support sector\nmonitoring and reporting by funding a baseline survey of water points, development of a national water sector M&E\nsystem, hiring of an independent verification agent (IVA) to verify Program results, and operational costs for managing\nthe Program. There will be ongoing refugee policy and regulatory support in the implementation of the WASH elements\nof the Shirika Plan and coordination of the operation’s implementation with humanitarian WASH stakeholders led by DRS.\n\n\n**D. Program Development Objective(s) (PDO) and PDO Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n28. **The PDO is to increase sustainable access to improved water and sanitation services, eliminate open defecation,**\n**and improve the financial performance of water services providers in selected counties, including refugee hosting**\n**counties.**\n\n\n**PDO Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n29. The PDO indicators by outcomes are the following:\n\n\n(a) Outcome 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable\n\nrural areas in selected counties, including refugees hosting counties:\n\n\n(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the\nProgram [36] (Number, disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)\n\n\n(b) Outcome 2: Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation\n\nin climate-vulnerable rural areas in selected counties, including refugee-hosting counties:\n\n\n35 The GoK standards for schools are disability inclusive, but the project will support the GoK to fill gaps in disability inclusion in design standards for\nHCFs and other public facilities under the Program.\n36 Measured through DLI2: number of households provided with access to improved water services; and DLI3: number of sustainably functioning\nwater schemes.\n\n\nPage 17 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSS\nInfrastructure Design Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.8367874026298523,
+ "start": 112,
+ "end": 116
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "baseline survey of water points",
+ "confidence": 0.8301588892936707,
+ "start": 331,
+ "end": 336
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "sector\nmonitoring and reporting",
+ "confidence": 0.7490348815917969,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "service providers",
+ "confidence": 0.5105600953102112,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 315
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national water sector M&E\nsystem",
+ "confidence": 0.7775813937187195,
+ "start": 340,
+ "end": 347
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "sector\nmonitoring and reporting",
+ "confidence": 0.5070966482162476,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PDO Level Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9205819368362427,
+ "start": 478,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8490947484970093,
+ "start": 509,
+ "end": 510
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI2",
+ "confidence": 0.6190255880355835,
+ "start": 626,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.7969373464584351,
+ "start": 509,
+ "end": 510
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI3",
+ "confidence": 0.9171728491783142,
+ "start": 640,
+ "end": 641
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services [37] (Number, disaggregated by\ngender, refugees, and host community members)\n\n\n(ii) Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)\n\n\n(c) Outcome 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties:\n\n\n(i) WSPs that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio (OCCR) target (Number) as per\ntheir approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (PCE).\n\n\n30. The estimated number of beneficiaries in the 19 counties under the Program is 4 million people, including 320,000\nrefugees and 400,000 host community members. This represents 33 percent of the population without access to improved\nwater and sanitation services nationally.\n\n\n**E. Disbursement Linked Indicators and Verification Protocols**\n\n\n31. **The Program’s incentive model consists of 12 disbursement-linked Indicators (DLIs) grouped into five RAs across**\n**five disbursement periods** . Table 3 presents the DLIs under each of the proposed RAs and the financing amounts allocated\nto each DLI. Further details, including eligible expenditures, activity descriptions, and verification procedures are provided\nin annex 2.\n\n\n**Table 3. Description of DLIs under the Program**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Disbursement Linked
Indicator|Allocation
(US$,
millions)|Description of DLI|Comments on Related Activities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable rural areas (US$71.8**
**million)**|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable rural areas (US$71.8**
**million)**|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable rural areas (US$71.8**
**million)**|**RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for households in climate-vulnerable rural areas (US$71.8**
**million)**|\n|**DLI 1:**Number of
counties that have an
approved County
Water and Sanitation
Strategy and
Investment Plan
(CWSS&IP)|19|Five-year
CWSS&IP
and
its
implementation
roadmap are formally approved by the County
Executive Committee (CEC). The minimum structure
and contents of the CWSS&IP will be defined in the
Program Operations Manual (POM).|Strategy will assess the county’s water
resources
to
ensure
proposed
developments
of
water
supply
schemes are resilient to projected
climate
variability
and
change,
resulting in projected greenhouse gas
(GHG)
emissions
reduction.
The
investment plan and implementation
roadmap will guide both public and
private investments.|\n\n\n\n37 Measured through DLI 4: number of households provided with access to improved sanitation services and DLI 5: number of villages achieving and\nsustaining community-wide sanitation (CWS) status.\n\n\nPage 18 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Disbursement Linked
Indicator|Allocation
(US$,
millions)|Description of DLI|Comments on Related Activities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**DLI 2:**Number of
households provided
with access to
improved water
services|32.8|Number of households provided with access to
improved water services out of water supply
schemes developed under the Program: the
connections should come from a scheme that has
technical design meeting the minimum design
checklist as defined in the POM, including proof of
climate resilience; the household served is in an
unserved rural area; the water scheme complies
with water quality standards issued by WASREB;
access is through either a metered connection,
shared yard tap, or water kiosk at a maximum of
500m from the household. New connections from
schemes rehabilitated under the program are
eligible.|Design checklist will focus on climate
resilience and WASH+ approach.
Investments under DLI 2 are projected
to lead to GHG emissions reduction of
about 277,936 tCO2-eq per year for a
total of 8,616,014 tCO2-eq over the
project’s economic lifetime with
respect to water supply activities.|\n|**DLI 3**: Number of
sustainably
functioning water
schemes|20|Number of water schemes that are deemed
sustainable, meaning that (a) at least 90 percent of
household services (metered or kiosk) are
functioning as per definition of functionality defined
in the POM, (b) water schemes have a tariff system,
(c) water schemes achieve gradual O&M cost
recovery as defined in the POM, (d) water schemes
are operated by an approved service provider as per
WASREB regulations for rural areas as defined in the
POM, (e) leadership positions within the service
provider should not be more than two-thirds of the
same gender.|Sustainability referring to
functionality, inclusive and
transparent tariffs, O&M cost
recovery, and a regulated service
provider.|\n|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation in climate-vulnerable**
**rural areas (US$69.4 million)**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation in climate-vulnerable**
**rural areas (US$69.4 million)**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation in climate-vulnerable**
**rural areas (US$69.4 million)**|**RA 2: Increasing sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation in climate-vulnerable**
**rural areas (US$69.4 million)**|\n|**DLI 4:**Households
provided with access
to an improved
sanitation facility|24.6|Number of households provided with access to an
improved sanitation facility, meaning a facility at
household level that hygienically separates human
waste from human contact. Options of improved
sanitation services will be defined in the POM.|Design and construction criteria to
ensure disability accessible, MHM
friendly,
and
climate-resilient
sanitation facilities.|\n\n\n\nPage 19 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Disbursement Linked
Indicator|Allocation
(US$,
millions)|Description of DLI|Comments on Related Activities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**DLI 5:**Number of
villages achieving and
sustaining
community-wide
sanitation (CWS)
status
|44.8|This DLI includes three disbursement-linked results
(DLRs) to account for (a) DLR 5.1 - number of villages
that achieve ODF status, (b) DLR 5.2 - number of
villages certified as achieving CWS status. The
following requirement of CWS certification must be
fully met: (i) village has been verified as achieving
ODF status; (ii) at least 70 percent of households in
the village have access to an improved sanitation
facility; (iii) all public ECD and primary schools within
the village have improved school WASH facilities
meeting minimum standards, (iv) all public HCF
within the village have access to improved WASH
facilities that meet minimum standards, and (v)
fecal waste from the schools and HCFs are safely
disposed. (c) DLR 5.3 - number of villages that
sustain CWS status.|The WASH facilities in public ECD and
primary schools and HCFs will comply
with the minimum standards set by
the Ministry of Health (MoH) and
Ministry of Education (MoE), inclusive
and climate resilient. The WASH
facilities will also adhere to O&M
framework to be prepared under the
IPF. Sanitation activities covered
under DLIs 4 and 5 result in net
average annual emissions are –
243,375 tCO2-eq per year for a total of
–7,544,629 tCO2-eq over the project’s
economic lifetime.|\n|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties (US$43.8 million)**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties (US$43.8 million)**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties (US$43.8 million)**|**RA 3: Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties (US$43.8 million)**|\n|**DLI 6:**Number of
WSPs compliant with
the legal and
regulatory
requirements for
good governance and
have an approved
PIAP|13.5|This DLI will be considered achieved when all the
following five conditions are fully met: (a) have a
valid WASREB license; (b) have a WASREB-approved
justified tariff; (c) have a fully constituted Board of
Directors as per WASREB regulations, with
leadership not being more than two-thirds of the
same gender; (d) have a performance contract
between the WSP and the county government with
clear KPIs38 and conditions for ring-fencing
autonomy of the WSP operations; and (e) have a
Performance Improved Action Plan (PIAP) approved
by the Board of Directors to improve WSP
performance.|Achieving
legal
and
regulatory
requirements for good governance
and implementing the PIAPs are
critical
building
blocks
toward
achieving creditworthiness and an
enabling environment for attracting
private sector financing. The PIAP will
have targets for energy efficiency,
water demand management, NRW
reduction, resource efficiency, gender
diversity,
and
community
engagement.|\n|**DLI 7**: Number of
WSPs progressively
achieving their
Operating Cost
Coverage Ratio
(OCCR) targets as per
their approved
Performance
Improvement Action
(PIAPs)|22.3|To be eligible for disbursement under this DLI, the
WSP must show sustained full compliance with the
legal and regulatory requirements for good
governance defined in DLI 6. OCCR is selected as a
good aggregate measure for the successful
implementation of the PIAPs. Yearly disbursements
will be made against progressive achievement of the
OCCR target stated in the PIAP. Each WSP will set an
OCCR target and disbursement under this DLI will be
scalable to the change made toward that target.|Reduction in physical losses through
metered areas, instalment of micro-
meters, and replacement of pipes and
inefficient pumps will lead to a
significant reduction in energy and
associated costs bringing NRW down
from 51 percent to 30 percent by
2027. Gains from switching to solar-
diesel power from 100 percent diesel
similarly culminate in net emissions
reduction of 19,675.94 tCO2-eq. A
positive OCCR is a precursor to attract
private capital to the water sector.|\n\n\n\n38 WSP responsibilities required by county contracts are based on WASREB and national policy. They include standards for community engagement\nand client satisfaction monitoring and reporting through KPIs.\n\n\nPage 20 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI",
+ "confidence": 0.6329562067985535,
+ "start": 42,
+ "end": 43
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "DLRs",
+ "confidence": 0.6889575719833374,
+ "start": 119,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9406708478927612,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "villages",
+ "confidence": 0.7279903888702393,
+ "start": 79,
+ "end": 80
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CWS certification",
+ "confidence": 0.7717409729957581,
+ "start": 170,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8623554110527039,
+ "start": 203,
+ "end": 204
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RA 3",
+ "confidence": 0.67979896068573,
+ "start": 456,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.7778226733207703,
+ "start": 467,
+ "end": 469
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI 6",
+ "confidence": 0.6479347944259644,
+ "start": 561,
+ "end": 563
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7619709968566895,
+ "start": 571,
+ "end": 572
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7842800617218018,
+ "start": 785,
+ "end": 786
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7489307522773743,
+ "start": 885,
+ "end": 886
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.506516695022583,
+ "start": 929,
+ "end": 930
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "KPIs",
+ "confidence": 0.5584198832511902,
+ "start": 1200,
+ "end": 1201
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2027",
+ "confidence": 0.9272421002388,
+ "start": 1113,
+ "end": 1114
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Disbursement Linked
Indicator|Allocation
(US$,
millions)|Description of DLI|Comments on Related Activities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**DLI 8:**Amount of
financing leveraged
by WSPs from
private/commercial
financing sources|8|Disbursement will be triggered by the WSP securing
a commercial loan deal to finance bankable projects
included in the PIAP, contributing to improvements
in the OCCR. This DLI will provide 50 percent of total
bankable project cost, or 100 percent of the
commercial loan secured. For example, for a
bankable project cost of US$100,000, commercial
loan should be US$50,000 and the DLI contribution
will be US$50,000.|Bankable project supported by this
DLI will fund interventions mentioned
above in the WSP’s PIAPs to become
more cost efficient. This figure
represents
Private
Capital
Mobilization (PCM).|\n|**RA 4: Improving sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management (US$5 million)**|**RA 4: Improving sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management (US$5 million)**|**RA 4: Improving sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management (US$5 million)**|**RA 4: Improving sector reforms, coordination, and M&E Capacity for integrated water management (US$5 million)**|\n|**DLI 9:**Water sector
intergovernmental
Planning,
Coordination and
Monitoring reforms
implemented|5|This DLI will include two DLRs: (a) DLR 9.1 for the
Approval and implementation of a Water Sector
Performance-based
Financing
Mechanism
to
facilitate intergovernmental fiscal transfers for
water services between the Ministry of Water,
Counties and WSPs and (b) DLR 9.2 for the
implementation of the Water Sector Inter-
Governmental Coordination Framework including
annual joint M&E reporting by both levels of
government.|Establishment of the
intergovernmental fiscal transfer
mechanism and effective
intergovernmental coordination are
critical sector reforms necessary to
improve enabling environment for
increasing public and private
investments for WSS.|\n|**Result area 5: Improving integrated WASH services delivery for refugees and host communities (US$40 million)**|**Result area 5: Improving integrated WASH services delivery for refugees and host communities (US$40 million)**|**Result area 5: Improving integrated WASH services delivery for refugees and host communities (US$40 million)**|**Result area 5: Improving integrated WASH services delivery for refugees and host communities (US$40 million)**|\n|**DLI 10:**Number of
refugee and host
community
households in
Refugee Hosting
Counties provided
with improved access
to WASH services|20|Disbursements will be triggered under two DLRs: (a)
DLR 10.1 - Number of households in the refugee
camps, and in the host, communities provided with
access to improved water services under the
Program
(b) DLR 10.2 - Number of households in the refugee
camps, and in the host, communities provided with
access to an improved sanitation facility.
Same definition of access as in DLIs 2 and 4 to apply.|The design and construction of water
schemes and sanitation facilities will
be based on a design checklist with a
focus on inclusive climate resilient
designs and a WASH+ approach.
Designs and construction within
refugee camps will be required to
align the designs with the Shirika Plan
and updated WSS design manual.|\n|**DLI 11:**Number of
sustainably
functioning water
schemes in refugee-
hosting counties|8|Disbursements to refugee hosting counties will be
triggered
proportionate
to
the
number
of
sustainably functioning water schemes in both the
refugee camps and in host communities as defined
in the POM. Same definition of sustainable schemes
used in DLI 3 applies with the addition that schemes
in refugee camps are operated as per DRS
regulations for the refugee camps.|This DLI will primarily incentivize
sustainable O&M of water schemes
for refugees and host communities
constructed under the Program.|\n|**DLI 12**: Number of
villages in the
refugee camps, and
in the host
communities
certified as achieving
and sustaining CWS
status|12|This DLI includes three DLRs to account for (a) DLR
12.1 - number of villages that achieve ODF status,
(b) DLR 12.2 - number of villages certified as
achieving CWS status, and (c) DLR 12.3 - number of
villages that sustain CWS status. Same definition
used in DLI 5 will apply under these DLRs.|Activities covered under DLIs 10 and
12, along with DLIs 4 and 5 result in
net average annual emissions are –
243,375 (–277,936) tCO2-eq per year
for a total of –7,544,629 (–8,616,014)
tCO2-eq
over
the
operation’s
economic lifetime.|\n\n\nPage 21 of 58\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n32. **Verification of DLIs will be carried out by the IVA hired by the SDWS.** The results reported by the SDWS (Results\nReport), as achieved under the Program, will be verified through a paper audit, physical inspection, and phone calls that\ntest the accuracy and quality of results claimed. In accordance with good audit practice, physical verification will take place\nagainst a sampling framework. The IVA will prepare a Results Verification Report (RVR), which will be shared with the\nSDWS and the World Bank. The RVR will be used to determine the amount of the eligible disbursement to be made based\non the results achieved. Further details on the verification process for each DLI are included in Annex 2.\n\n\n**III.** **PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n33. **Program implementing agencies.** [39] The primary implementing agencies under the Program are as follows:\n\n\n(a) **The MoWSI, through the State Department of Water Sanitation and Sewerage Development, will have**\n\n**overall accountability for Program delivery.** A dedicated Program Management Unit (PMU) headed by a\nprogram coordinator will be set up by the SDWS. The PMU will include a program accountant, procurement\nofficer, an internal auditor, an M&E officer, a social development specialist, an environmental specialist, and\na communications’ specialist. The PMU will provide technical coordination, capacity building, and\nbackstopping support and undertake activities leading to the national levels results in DLI 9 under RA 4. The\nSDWS will also engage the IVA to undertake results verification under the Program.\n\n\n(b) **The county governments, through their water departments, will be the main implementing agencies for**\n\n**activities under RA 1, RA 2, and RA 5.** Each participating county government will establish a dedicated\nProgram Implementation Unit (PIU) under the County Water Department to lead implementation of all\ncounty-level activities. The PIU will be headed by a fulltime program coordinator and will include staff from\nthe County Department of Health and Department of Education among other staff.\n\n\n(c) **The WSPs will be the main implementing agencies for RA 3** within their areas of licensed service coverage.\nThe WSPs will undertake the eligible program of expenditures leading to the results envisioned in RA 3.\n\n\n(d) **Special PIUs will be formed for implementation of WASH activities in the refugee camps in Turkana and**\n\n**Garissa Counties under RA 5.** These PIUs will be chaired by the respective Refugee Camp Manager and cochaired by the respective County Chief Officer in-charge of Water. The PIUs’ composition will include staff\nfrom each county, the respective WWDA, and the DRS. The special PIUs will coordinate closely with the\nUNHCR, through the DRS, and with the main county PIUs.\n\n\n(e) **The Water Fund** will provide TA to the WSPs in the preparation of bankable projects for commercial financing\n\nand to facilitate the disbursement of funds directly to WSPs for the results achieved under RA 3.\n\n\n34. **Participating entities.** Other key entities participating in the Program in collaboration with the implementing\nagencies include the DRS to coordinate and provide oversight of all refugee camp activities; Ministry of Health (Public\nHealth Department) to coordinate the sanitation activities with the counties including the BCC campaign, WASH in HCFs\nand technical and capacity-building support to counties; MoE to coordinate with the counties on the WASH in schools’\nactivities; WASREB to provide technical support to counties and WSPs to ensure regulatory compliance and\nimplementation of O&M service delivery models and WSP PIAPs. The Council of Governors and State Department of\n\n\n39 Further details on the implementation arrangements, the role of each entity and oversight mandates will be defined in the Program Operation\nManual (POM).\n\n\nPage 22 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nDevolution will both work with the SDWS in coordinating with county governments and DRS, and under it, with UNHCR,\nto support coordination of refugee WASH stakeholders. As needed, WWDAs may extend TA and capacity building to\ncounty governments and WSPs. Each of these entities will appoint a focal point who will coordinate with the PMU in the\nimplementation of the Program.\n\n\n35. **The Program will have a Program Steering Committee (PSC) and a Program Technical Committee (PTC).** The PSC\nwill provide policy guidance, oversight, and strategic direction including inter-ministries, departments, and agencies\n(MDAs) coordination and conflict arbitration. The PSC will meet at least biannually and as and when required and will be\nresponsible for endorsing the Annual Performance Assessment (APA) results. The PTC will deliberate and prepare motions\nfor decision-making by the PSC. The PTC will meet at least quarterly and as and when required, to review Program\nimplementation progress and financial accountability reports, review and verify APA reports, identify, and address any\nemerging technical issues and challenges in implementation of the operation. Further, the PTC will advise the PSC on policy\nand strategic issues. The composition of the PSC and PTC and their terms of reference will be detailed in the POM.\n\n\n36. A POM will be prepared as an effectiveness condition and will include (a) the activities and timetable of actions to\nbe carried out under the Program and excluded activities; (b) the respective roles and responsibilities of entities\nparticipating in the Program; (c) the composition and responsibilities of the PMU and the county PIUs; (d) the fiduciary,\ntechnical, and operational aspects and procedures for implementation of the Program, including the financial\nmanagement (FM) procedures; (e) the procedures for distribution of IDA credit proceeds to the 19 participating counties\nand to the WSPs; (f) the verification protocols for the DLIs and DLRs; and (g) the anti-corruption guidelines.\n\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n37. **The SDWS will retain overall responsibility for Program results M&E.** Results reporting and verification will be\nconducted on an annual cycle linked to the national planning and budgeting process. Each county PIU will produce and\nsubmit to the SDWS PMU a quarterly Program Results Monitoring Report. The SDWS will compile a combined results\nreport for all the 19 participating counties and their WSPs before the start of each verification period, summarizing the\nprogress in achieving results up to the verification date. The reports will be submitted to the IVA as the starting document\nto work with before conducting the actual verification as per the verification protocol defined in the POM. A template of\nthe quarterly Program Monitoring Report will be included in the POM. The Program will adopt the approach and tools\ndeveloped by the Geo-Enabling Initiative for Monitoring and Supervision (GEMS) to collect and track achievement of\nresults. Use of the GEMS tools and a dedicated K-WASH M&E dashboard established by the SDWS to display the Program\ndata will enhance the transparency and accountability of the Program. Several of the results indicators under the Program\nwill be disaggregated by gender (Annex 1). These indicators measure progress toward reducing important gender gaps\nthat could affect program outcomes if not addressed. These data will facilitate gender-inclusive planning and management\nof the Program. The PMU will submit semiannual progress reports, a midterm review report, and a completion report for\nthe Program to the World Bank.\n\n\n**C. Disbursement Arrangements**\n\n\n38. **Disbursements will be triggered by the achievement of DLI-related results for the Program and verified by the**\n**IVA.** The IVA will compile an RVR and share it with the SDWS PMU and World Bank. The SDWS will submit a withdrawal\napplication to the World Bank upon notification of the formal approval of the verification report by the World Bank. The\nfollowing is how IDA funds will be distributed: for RAs 1, 2, and 5 funds will be disbursed directly from the National Treasury\n(NT) to the County Revenue Fund upon the SDWS’s request to NT, accompanied by an RVR; for RA 3, the Water Fund,\n\n\nPage 23 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual Performance Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9750781655311584,
+ "start": 158,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7354562878608704,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly Program Results Monitoring Report",
+ "confidence": 0.5114448666572571,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": {
+ "text": "county PIUs",
+ "confidence": 0.7796927094459534,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "19 participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5450366735458374,
+ "start": 362,
+ "end": 365
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "combined results\nreport",
+ "confidence": 0.7953870296478271,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5210979580879211,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "SDWS",
+ "confidence": 0.8475656509399414,
+ "start": 405,
+ "end": 406
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "19 participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.6362756490707397,
+ "start": 362,
+ "end": 365
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "results indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9075315594673157,
+ "start": 602,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "midterm review report",
+ "confidence": 0.551723837852478,
+ "start": 656,
+ "end": 659
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5021325349807739,
+ "start": 658,
+ "end": 659
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RVR",
+ "confidence": 0.6404429078102112,
+ "start": 799,
+ "end": 800
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nwhich manages the WSPs’ performance enhancement window, will receive funds from the NT, through the SDWS, then\ndisburse to WSPs; and for RA 4, the NT will disburse funds to the SDWS based on the RVR.\n\n\n**D. Capacity Building**\n\n\n39. **Through the IPF component, the SDWS PMU will coordinate TA and a program of capacity-building activities for**\n**the implementing agencies.** The IPF component will provide technical assistance and training to the implementing\nagencies to support them in addressing gaps identified in the technical, fiduciary, and environmental and social systems\nassessments, and in overall program management. It will also support the achievement of actions outlined in the Program\nAction Plan (PAP).\n\n\n**IV.** **ASSESSMENT SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A. Technical (including program economic evaluation)**\n\n\n40. **NAWASIP is a strategic relevant program playing a key role in supporting Kenya’s sustainable development and**\n**boosting its human capital.** In assessing its technical soundness, a key element that requires strengthening is the\nsustainability of investments in the sector. Ensuring equity of growth in Kenya will require a sustained focus on reducing\nrural poverty, and thus the strategic relevance of improving sustainable access to water and sanitation and WSP\nperformance is high.\n\n\n41. **Kenya already has a well-tested model for expanding the coverage of household sanitation in rural areas, where**\n**the core strategy utilizes CLTS to eradicate OD.** However, challenges include (a) inadequate funding for tackling OD, (b)\nslippage in maintaining ODF status, (c) collapsing latrine pits, and (d) inadequate marketing of sanitation products. The\nrural sector also lacks safe options for managing fecal sludge. Thus, the Program incentivizes achieving and sustaining the\nODF gains and improving the supply and installation of quality, aspirational, and affordable improved sanitation products\nand facilities, as well as safe fecal sludge management.\n\n\n42. **The rural water sector challenges identified in the technical assessment, which includes refugees, are well**\n**addressed by the Program design.** These include low access to improved water supply and sustainability issues due to a\nlack of appropriate management models, weak governance and accountability, and poor-quality construction. The\nassessment recommends paying special attention to the potential vulnerability of water resources to local hydrological\nvariability, exacerbated through climate change, requiring adaptation and mitigation strategies. WSPs require support to\nimprove operational efficiencies and incentives to strengthen governance and regulation. Incorporation of multiple water\nuse requires TA on designs, water quality, water bylaws, multiple-use governance, and O&M to be integrated in WSS\ndesign standards.\n\n\n43. **Public schools and HCFs lack sufficient clean water, and sanitation facilities are often unsegregated with**\n**insufficient drop holes and no MHM provision** **[40]** **or accessibility for people with disabilities.** Handwashing facilities with\nsoap and water are often lacking and hygiene behaviors are poor. There are no national-level standard designs for WASH\nfacilities at HCFs, and construction quality is an issue at both schools and HCFs. The Program will incentivize constructing\nquality standardized WASH facilities with gender sensitivity and/ or accessibility for people with disabilities and ensuring\nsuitable MHM arrangements and effective hygiene behavior change that also reaches refugees and host communities.\n\n\n40 World Bank. 2021. _Menstrual Health and Hygiene Resource Package_ .\n\n\nPage 24 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n44. **Implementation of NAWASIP will be accompanied by institutional and policy reform programs to ensure that**\n**universal access to WSS is achieved and sustained, as infrastructure alone is insufficient to achieve NAWASIP's goals.**\nThe operation will collectively incentivize addressing persistent institutional constraints by incorporating national and\ncounty-level reforms as criteria for achieving Program disbursements. A national integrated M&E system and Results\nFramework will be established by the SDWS for monitoring and reporting of the national program. The project will provide\nM&E capacity to the PMU and counties, including an M&E expert in the PMU at the SDWS to support both the PMU and\nthe counties. Technical recommendations are provided in the Technical Assessment report.\n\n\n**Program Expenditure Framework**\n\n\n45. **The Program Expenditure Framework identifies expenditure categories and activities included in NAWASIP,**\n**within the boundaries of this Program amounting to US$438 million for the PforR.** Eligible expenditures are compatible\nwith the description of RAs, and the Technical Assessment included an exercise to review such expenditures and update\nthem with information provided by all implementing agencies at ministerial and county level. Details of budget\nclassification structure have been reviewed, to ensure that expenditure categories have codes that allow tracking of\nProgram expenditures during Program implementation and at closure. The summary Program Expenditure Framework is\nshown in Table 4 below.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Table 4: Summary Program Expenditures|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Program Expenditure Category**
|**Total Allocation (capex and opex)**|**Total Allocation (capex and opex)**|\n||**K Sh**|**US$**|\n|RA 1: Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for
households in climate vulnerable rural areas|24,098,325,341|165,057,023|\n|RA 2: Increased access to improved sanitation services, & elimination of
OD in climate vulnerable rural areas|16,766,864,982|114,841,541|\n|RA 3: Improved operational & financial performance of Water Service
Providers in participating counties|13,716,236,787|93,946,827|\n|RA 4: Improving Sector reforms coordination & M&E Capacity for
integrated water management|876,000,000|6,000,000|\n|RA 5: Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties|8,490,572,890|58,154,609|\n|TOTAL COST OF PROGRAM|62,780,000,000|438,000,000|\n\n\n**Program economic Evaluation**\n\n\n46. **The Program economic and financial analyses evaluate the economic and financial impact of improvements in**\n**water supply and sanitation improvement in the 19 partici** pating counties. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was undertaken\nto estimate the economic and financial feasibility based on information provided by eight selected WSPs and by WASREB\nand its reports, as well as data from national household surveys. A six percent discount rate has been used. **The CBA results**\n**shows an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) between 20 and 2 percent and a Net Present value (NPV) between US$2,189 and**\n**US$2,947 million depending on the shadow price of carbon adopted.** Water benefits are significantly higher compared\nto the sanitation benefits. [41] Economic benefits include improvements in water supply systems and beneficial (including\nproductive) use and decreases in NRW. The rehabilitation and expansion of water supply and sanitation/wastewater\nsystems will have a positive impact on the incidence of waterborne-related diseases, primarily diarrhea (direct and\n\n\n41 The economic NPV for water systems ranges from US$2,095 to US$2,507 million depending on the shadow price of carbon rate used, with the\nIRR ranging from 75 to 94 percent, while sanitation benefits range from US$131 million to US$ 498 million and the IRR ranges from 7 to 10 percent.\n\n\nPage 25 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E system",
+ "confidence": 0.5147913694381714,
+ "start": 89,
+ "end": 93
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring and reporting of the national program",
+ "confidence": 0.7617666721343994,
+ "start": 103,
+ "end": 110
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "SDWS",
+ "confidence": 0.8954000473022461,
+ "start": 101,
+ "end": 102
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7057417035102844,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Technical Assessment report",
+ "confidence": 0.7695320844650269,
+ "start": 152,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.614309549331665,
+ "start": 154,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Program Expenditure Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.8015962839126587,
+ "start": 158,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Program Expenditure Category",
+ "confidence": 0.5979669690132141,
+ "start": 308,
+ "end": 311
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7240875959396362,
+ "start": 374,
+ "end": 378
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.7525618076324463,
+ "start": 372,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national household surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.6843898892402649,
+ "start": 624,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WASREB",
+ "confidence": 0.696563184261322,
+ "start": 614,
+ "end": 615
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "shadow price of carbon rate",
+ "confidence": 0.8261921405792236,
+ "start": 783,
+ "end": 788
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "water systems",
+ "confidence": 0.5204973816871643,
+ "start": 764,
+ "end": 766
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nindirect), nutrition, and household small productive activities. Diarrheal disease is transmitted chiefly through the fecaloral route. An estimated 94 percent of the diarrheal burden of disease is attributable to the environment, linked to unsafe\ndrinking water, poor sanitation, and hygiene. Direct savings are related to reduction of diarrhea incidence (in 2023, 21.3\npercent of Kenyan children under five years reported diarrhea). Based on the World Health Organization global estimates,\nthe Program is expected to reduce diarrhea incidence in selected counties by 5 percent per year from 21.3 percent to 16\npercent a year. The Program will reduce GHG emissions through strategic investment into WSS provision, with the most\nGHG emission reductions expected from reduced use of charcoal due to improved water quality, conversion of wet latrines\ninto emptiable latrines, investment into solar pumping, and reduction of losses and NRW. The water supply activities yield\nnet average annual emissions of –277,936 tCO2-eq per year for a total of –8,616,014 tCO2-eq over the project’s economic\nlifetime. For the sanitation activities, the net average annual emissions are –243,375 tCO2-eq per year for a total of –\n7,544,629 tCO2-eq over the project’s economic lifetime. Thus, the Program will contribute to 31 percent reduction in\ncarbon emissions compared to the baseline estimated at 16.2 million tCO2e over the 30 years analysis period or 540,768\ntCO2e annually.\n\n\n**Table 5. Project GHG Accounting**\n\n|GHG Accounting|Water|Wastewater|Total|\n|---|---|---|---|\n||tCO2e|tCO2e|tCO2e|\n|Baseline|24,219,667|28,206,402|52,426,069|\n|With Program|15,583,977|20,619,066|36,203,043|\n|Net reduction|(8,635,690)|(7,587,336)|(16,223,026)|\n|Annual reduction|(287,856)|(252,911)|(540,768)|\n|Percent reduction, %|36|27|31|\n\n\n\n**Paris Alignment**\n\n\n47. **The Program is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement on both mitigation and adaptation.** The Program\nis consistent with Kenya’s updated first Nationally Determined Contribution (submitted to the United Nations Framework\nConvention on Climate Change (UNFCC) in 2020), Kenya National Adaptation Plan (KNAP, 2015–2030), and with Kenya\nVision 2030—its long-term development blueprint. The Program is designed to build rural communities’ resilience to local\nclimate risks and support the federal and county government’s joint efforts to make water supply and sanitation schemes\nmore resilient to climate change and less emissive. All activities envisaged under the Program are on the Universally (Paris)\nAligned sanitation objectives of KNAP, 2015–2030, by mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into water sector planning,\npromoting efficient water resource technologies, and enhancing capacity of institutions responsible for water and\nsanitation.\n\n\n48. **Assessment and reduction of adaptation risks.** The technical assessment revealed that the Program is aligned\nwith the Paris Agreement, as it promotes reduction of GHG emissions and provision of solutions for adaptation and climate\nresilience. The Program area faces high exposure to climate risks, with the main climate and disaster risks affecting the\nproject being droughts and floods. Increased climate risks will raise pressure on limited rural water resources, and\npopulation movements may increase strain on infrastructure. Extreme flooding and sea-level rise could also increase risks\nboth to water production and sanitation facilities. These climate change-related risks are reduced by the Program design\nthrough upgrading critical water and sanitation infrastructure and proactively reducing risks through soft components.\nAdaptation-related activities include (a) improved watershed management and switching rural villages from ephemeral\nto permanent water sources—thereby increasing water security; (b) reducing NRW through rehabilitation and\nconstruction of climate-resilient infrastructure and increasing the water available for end users; (c) strengthening the\ncounty government and WSP institutional capacity to respond to climate shocks and increase reliability of services offered\n\n\nPage 26 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nby WSP; [42] and (d) designing climate-resilient sanitation infrastructure to increase access and improving reliability of\nsanitation services in households, public schools, and HCFs, thereby improving public health outcomes in the program\narea. Improving WSPs’ performance will allow them to continue investing in climate-resilient infrastructure and their\nmaintenance, thus contributing to sustainable service delivery. As a result, climate risks will be reduced to an acceptable\nlevel and will not have a material impact on the program achieving its development objectives.\n\n\n49. **Assessment and reduction of mitigation risks.** The operation is not at material risk of having a negative impact\non the country’s low-GHG emissions development pathways. A reduction of GHG emissions will be derived from both\nwater supply and sanitation interventions. Mitigation-related activities center on (a) reducing the use of charcoal for\nboiling water, (b) reducing untreated or partially treated wastewater discharged into rivers, (c) improving fecal sludge\nmanagement (mainly collection and transport) and public facilities (schools and hospitals), and (d) reducing energy\nconsumption by improving energy efficiency and utilization of solar pumps. The largest GHG emission reduction is\nexpected from the reduced use of charcoal and conversion of wet latrines to emptiable latrines, followed by reduction of\nNRW and employment of solar pumping. In addition, improving the operational and financial performance of WSPs will\nallow them to continue investing in energy efficiency enhancements in both water and wastewater, thereby further\nreducing GHG emissions.\n\n\n**B. Fiduciary**\n\n\n50. **A Fiduciary System Assessment (FSA) was conducted on the Program based on the World Bank’s Program-for-**\n**Results Fiduciary Systems Assessment Guidance Notes of March 8, 2022.** The assessment revealed that the procurement\nand FM systems capacity and performance are adequate to provide reasonable assurance that the Program funds will be\nused for the intended purposes with due attention to the principles of economy, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency,\nand accountability **.** A detailed standalone FSA has been prepared clarifying the risk and mitigating measures. High-value\ncontracts involving procurement of goods, works, and services whose estimated values exceed the applicable Operations\nProcurement Review Committee thresholds set out in the World Bank procurement procedures shall be excluded from\nthe Program.\n\n\n51. **The Program benefits from well-established public financial management (PFM) and procurement legal**\n**frameworks and systems but is prone to fiduciary risks that are assessed as substantial.** Despite the various progress\nnoted in the overall PFM framework, the Program is exposed to risks associated with gaps noted in FM, procurement, and\nmanagement of fraud and corruption including inadequate budget; missing budget codes for program budget and\nexpenditure tracking and reporting; delays in disbursement of funds leading to pending bills and delayed procurements;\nrecurring audit opinion especially on WSPs; limited number of internal audit staff in most entities and high\nturnover/transfer of staff; lack of accounting and billing systems in some of the WSPs; inadequate disclosure of\nprocurement-related documents; lack of contract management and tracking arrangements; and gaps in procurementrelated handling mechanisms. Furthermore, the reporting arrangements for fraud and corruption and coordination among\nthe various stakeholders will require further strengthening.\n\n\n52. **The Program has mechanisms in place to mitigate the identified risks using DLIs, the PAP, and the POM.** The\nProgram will benefit from the reform supporting operations that the World Bank has in the PFM sector. In addition, the\nDLIs aim to address the institutional challenges that the implementing entities face. Additional PAP measures have been\nproposed to strengthen the current system, including accounting and financial recording system for the WSPs; monitoring\n\n\n42 World Bank. 2018. _Building the Resilience of WSS Utilities to Climate Change and Other Threats: A Road Map_ . Washington, DC: World Bank\nGroup; World Bank. 2020. _Resilient Water Infrastructure Design Brief_ . Washington, DC. World Bank Group.\n\n\nPage 27 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\ntimeliness of county audit reports; publication of procurement-related documents; development of procurement-related\ncomplaint handling mechanisms; development and implementation of procurement and contract management\nmonitoring and tracking arrangements; and capacity-building initiatives for FM, procurement, and the Commission on\nAdministrative Justice (CAJ). To ensure proper reporting of fraud and corruption complaints as indicated in the World\nBank’s anti-corruption guidelines, [43] both the CAJ and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission will undertake annual\ncertification of the implementing agencies and the process will be monitored and reported on by the PMU as defined in\nPAP. The use of debarred firms will be monitored regularly during the preliminary Evaluation of the Tenders from the\n[World Bank website: http://www.worldbank.org/debar.](http://www.worldbank.org/debar)\n\n\n53. **The FM residual risk for the operation is substantial, with country-level fiduciary systems having strengths and**\n**weaknesses.** The Government has implemented reforms, such as the 2012 PFM Law, Integrated Financial Management\nand Information System, Treasury Single Account, International Public Sector Accounting Standards, and Office of the\nAuditor General, to enhance accountability, transparency, and cash management. The assessment identified significant\nfiduciary risks at the MoWSI, including delays in exchequer releases, delayed development activities, variances in financial\nstatements, unreported bills, inconsistent project budgeting, and unresolved prior year matters. The internal audit\ncommittee was not fully constituted, and external audit reports for 2021/2022 were not submitted nine months after the\nfinancial year's end.\n\n\n54. **The MoWSI will implement a Financial Management Action Plan to mitigate risks in K-WASH, as it will have the**\n**fiduciary responsibility.** It will establish a separate IDA budget code, open a Designated Account, designate a project\naccountant and internal auditor, conduct annual risk-based fiduciary reviews, and document FM procedures. A designated\naccountant will be the focal point at the Water Fund and WASREB. Overall, the FSA shows that the FM arrangements meet\nWorld Bank's minimum requirements, providing accurate and timely project status information. Financial reporting and\naudit arrangements are captured under the Disbursement and Financial Information Letter and the FM Manual will\ncapture the detailed FM arrangements.\n\n\n**C. Environmental and Social**\n\n\n55. **The Environmental and Social System Assessment (ESSA) assessed the Program’s E&S features,** including (a) the\nadequacy of the country system to manage the Environmental, Social, Health, and Safety (ESHS) risks and impacts; (b) the\nsystem as written and as practiced; (c) E&S compliance monitoring, reporting, and feedback; and (d) the existence and\neffectiveness of the grievance redress mechanism (GRM). Potential E&S risks are linked to civil works subprojects under\nRAs 1, 2, and 5. They include vegetation clearing; generation and unsafe disposal of construction waste and septage\neffluents; soil and water pollution; increased demand for water for construction; traffic congestion, obstruction of access,\nroads/paths and increased road accidents; community and occupation health and safety incidents; soil and water\npollution; disruption of existing infrastructure or services; land/wayleave acquisition without compensation; physical and\neconomic displacement; loss of livelihoods; labor influx; sexual exploitation and abuse and sexual harassment; elite\ncapture/political interference; exclusion of vulnerable and marginalized groups and other vulnerable individuals and\ngroups from Program benefits; use of forced and child labor; inadequate stakeholder engagement and information\ndisclosure; social conflict over scarce resources in arid and semi-arid lands counties; conflict between refugees and host\ncommunities; ineffective management of labor risks; ineffective/inadequate/inaccessible GRM; weak E&S capacity of\nimplementing agencies; and institutional E&S gaps identified in the ESSA.\n\n\n43 The World Bank (2011). Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Program-for-Results Financing\n\n\nPage 28 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n56. **The ESSA found that the country has robust legal, regulatory, and institutional frameworks consistent with the**\n**Program’s ESHS Core Principles at the national level, and if applied as written, the system can effectively manage the**\n**ESHS effects.** However, social risk management (SRM) functions are fragmented across various MDAs without\ncoordination mechanisms. Counties have environment, climate, and natural resource management departments but their\nfunctions are unstructured, with no oversight roles over other departments. There is low commitment to SRM at the\nnational and county levels, both of which have inadequate E&S human and financial resources. Other challenges include\nlimited understanding of E&S frameworks, shortage of skilled staff, weak grievance management, exclusion of vulnerable\nand marginalized groups, inadequate stakeholder engagement, and inadequate legislative frameworks for SRM and\nmonitoring and reporting on E&S performance.\n\n\n57. **To mitigate the Program ESHS risks, the exclusion principles in PforR programs are applied and mitigation**\n**measures included in the PAP.** High-risk investments with significant adverse impacts on the environment or people, for\nexample, large dams or resettlements affecting over 200 people, are not financed under K-WASH. Enhancing the\nProgram’s ESHS risk management involves integrating the following measures into the PAP: (a) actions to strengthen\nenvironmental, health, and social systems, including adequate human and financial resources; (b) actions to strengthen\nenvironmental, health, and SRM practice and monitoring; and (c) actions to build the capacity of implementation staff.\n\n\n58. **The IPF component will finance activities related to TA, capacity building, and supporting Program operational**\n**coordination, mainly at the SDWS, Water Fund, and other MDAs that will be participating in the Program.** In line with\nthe Environmental and Social Framework requirements, the GoK has prepared an Environmental and Social Commitment\nPlan, Stakeholder Engagement Plan, and Labor Management Procedures to manage E&S risks associated with this\ncomponent. Consultations were carried out in Nairobi on April 11, 2023, for national level stakeholders, and in Kirinyaga,\nKitui, Kericho, and Baringo counties between April 12 - 19, 2023, targeting county level stakeholders where counties were\ngrouped in geographical clusters. Additional consultations were held with county level stakeholders on October 5, 2023,\nto review and concur with the draft instruments. All the E&S documents were disclosed by the GoK on October 13, 2023 [44]\nand on the World Bank’s external website on October 23, 2023.\n\n\n59. **OP 7.50 for Projects on International Waterways** . OP 7.50 is applicable to the Program as some of the proposed\ninterventions may impact water resources of the Kilimanjaro, Dawa, Rift and Sudd transboundary aquifers; and the Juba,\nLogatipi Swamp, Lake Natron, Lake Turkana, and Nile River systems. These are considered as international waterways\naccording to the Policy. The Bank, on behalf of the GoK, notified the other riparian countries (Burundi, DRC, Egypt, Eritrea,\nEthiopia, Rwanda, South Sudan, Sudan, Somalia, Tanzania, and Uganda) and informed the Nile Basin Initiative and the\nLake Victoria Basin Commission of the proposed Program. As of November 24, 2023, which was the latest deadline set out\nin the notification letters sent to the riparian countries to respond on the Program, no responses have been received.\nBased on the outcome of the notification process and the assessment that the operation will not cause appreciable harm,\nRVP clearance was given to proceed with preparation of the operation.\n\n\n60. **Grievance Management (GM).** There will be two levels of project grievance management: at national and at\ncounty level. At county level, the first responsibility for addressing grievances will be by the sub-county technical teams\nwho can then escalate to the county grievance management committee, whose work will be coordinated by the County\nPIU. At the national level, a national grievance management committee will be established, and its work will be\n\n\n44 [http://www.water.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Final-ESCP-K-WASH_16102023.pdf;](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FFinal-ESCP-K-WASH_16102023.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vdS9Xynw9ds6HEEPI1rqOdq4SAKiAaWE7L22GEgZunw%3D&reserved=0) [http://www.water.go.ke/wp-](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FFinal-ESSA-Report-for-WASH-P179012-Aug-31st.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oYzXem6mrdgSOYy5tFWpmpC4y7lpBaV4Z1YeBsA%2ByRU%3D&reserved=0)\n[content/uploads/2023/10/Final-ESSA-Report-for-WASH-P179012-Aug-31st.pdf;](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FFinal-ESSA-Report-for-WASH-P179012-Aug-31st.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oYzXem6mrdgSOYy5tFWpmpC4y7lpBaV4Z1YeBsA%2ByRU%3D&reserved=0) [http://www.water.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Final-](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FFinal-Labour-Management-Procedure-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=alRONooDOIk5Ts2J8tFb5u4b1Aj4vx1wA3qazHTOu%2BM%3D&reserved=0)\n[Labour-Management-Procedure-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf;](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FFinal-Labour-Management-Procedure-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=alRONooDOIk5Ts2J8tFb5u4b1Aj4vx1wA3qazHTOu%2BM%3D&reserved=0) [http://www.water.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Stakeholder-Engagement-](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FStakeholder-Engagement-Plan-SEP-for-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PbxYJaLpXV3p3K79GTQBYoh2U3UcVrijE9bHyU1yEVM%3D&reserved=0)\n[Plan-SEP-for-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf](https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.water.go.ke%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F10%2FStakeholder-Engagement-Plan-SEP-for-K-WASH-P179012-111023.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Cpndungu%40worldbank.org%7Cf8392b4d28064d6e028108dbcee66711%7C31a2fec0266b4c67b56e2796d8f59c36%7C0%7C0%7C638331261345647197%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PbxYJaLpXV3p3K79GTQBYoh2U3UcVrijE9bHyU1yEVM%3D&reserved=0)\n\n\nPage 29 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\ncoordinated by the national PMU. The PMU will have a GM expert who will handle all the grievances at the national level\nas well as those escalated by the counties. Should a grievance not be resolved by the county and national level project\nmechanisms, the aggrieved party will be free to seek redress from other grievance handling mechanisms including the\njudicial system, the Bank’s Grievance Redress Services (GRS) or the Bank’s Accountability Mechanism.\n\n\n**D. Private Capital Facilitation, Gender, and Citizen Engagement**\n\n61. **Private Capital Facilitation. The Program reflects the World Bank’s mobilizing finance for development strategy,**\n**promotes PCM and is private capital enabled (PCE).** A total of US$8 million PCM out of commercial loans for WSPs is\nexpected to be leveraged under DLI 8. Collectively, the achievement of indicators from DLIs 1, 3, 6, and 7 on improving\nWSPs’ operating performance and sustainability are removing the binding constraints to enable sustainable private sector\nsolutions over the project duration. These are aligned with the approved County Water and Sanitation Investment Plans\nthat include roadmaps for sustainable private sector solutions. For the PCE indicator, at the Implementation Completion\nand Results Report stage, the number of WSPs achieving OCCR targets will be reviewed if additional commercial loans are\naccessed, for example, US$10 million, which is the balance of the US$18 million, net of US$8 million PCM, projected by\nthe Water Fund, through a market study, as potential commercial loans that can be leveraged by the participating WSPs.\n\n\n62. **Gender Equality. A baseline survey of WSPs identified key gender gaps in women’s employment in leadership**\n**positions for most of the Program’s WSPs.** Numerous factors contribute to this gender gap including entrenched gender\nnorms that deter women from applying to leadership positions and entering technical fields, lower rates of promotion,\nand weak or opposing incentives for hiring and promoting women. [45] The baseline for women in leadership positions in\nthe Program’s WSPs range from 0 to 55 percent. [46] National policies require that no more than two-thirds of either gender\noccupy leadership positions in WSPs and DLI 3 includes this criteria to achieve a qualifiable “Number of households with\naccess to a sustainably functioning water point.” DLI 6 will incentivize hiring and promoting women in WSPs through\nimplementation of the PIAP. The intermediate results indicator, “WSPs with at least one-third share of women in\nleadership positions,” will directly measure the share of women in leadership positions. Improved gender diversity and\nrepresentation is predicted to improve WSP efficiency and productivity, leading to more sustainable services. The Program\nwill also address gender gaps that are in the purview of the MoWSI at public schools and health facilities. [47] Poor WASH\naccess is a significant barrier preventing Kenyan girls from attending and completing school. [48] With the United Nations\nChildren’s Fund (UNICEF), the GoK has established standards for women’s and girls’ sanitation facilities in schools, [49] which\nthe Program incorporates as criteria for CWS (DLIs 4 and 5), such as lockable latrine doors, functional lights in facilities,\nand so on. Meeting these criteria will be monitored with intermediate results indicators. The IPF component will further\nsupport development of universal access standards for WASH facilities in HCFs. [50]\n\n\n63. **Citizen Engagement (CE). The Program will have a beneficiary-oriented design.** A Program-level analysis has\nidentified stakeholders affected by the Program or whose participation can affect outcomes. The Program will support\nimplementation and monitoring, including support to establish citizen’s feedback and consultation with WSPs and\n\n\n45 Ochieng, Christine. 2020. “Unlocking Women’s Potential in Kenya’s Water and Sanitation Sector.” _World Bank Blog_, July 8, 2020.\n[https://blogs.worldbank.org/water/unlocking-womens-potential-kenyas-water-and-sanitation-sector.](https://blogs.worldbank.org/water/unlocking-womens-potential-kenyas-water-and-sanitation-sector)\n46 These numbers reflect the data collected for 17 of 31 WSPs, which were the responders at the time of writing the PAD.\n47 Ministry of Health 2019 –2030. Menstrual Hygiene Management Policy. Refer to paragraph 36 of this PAD for arrangements.\n48 World Bank. 2022 _. The Enabling Environment for Menstrual Health and Hygiene: Case Study – Kenya_ . Washington, DC: World Bank.\n49 Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health, and Ministry of Water and Irrigation. 2017. _Standards and Guidelines for WASH Infrastructure in Pre-_\n_Primary and Primary Schools in Kenya_ . UNICEF - Kenya.\n50 In addition to the standards cited above, disabilities-inclusive sanitation facilities are contained in the GoK (2016) Kenya Environmental Sanitation\nand Hygiene Policy 2016–2030. Ministry of Health and the GoK (2016) Kenya Environmental Sanitation and Hygiene Strategic Framework (KESSF)\n2016–2020. These standards will also be met in public facilities under the Program.\n\n\nPage 30 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PCE indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9657838344573975,
+ "start": 242,
+ "end": 244
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Water Fund",
+ "confidence": 0.7238015532493591,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8457683324813843,
+ "start": 169,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "baseline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6315540671348572,
+ "start": 330,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.873248279094696,
+ "start": 331,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8441330790519714,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 321
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5690844655036926,
+ "start": 481,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.6675597429275513,
+ "start": 456,
+ "end": 457
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "intermediate results indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9370010495185852,
+ "start": 646,
+ "end": 649
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6433833837509155,
+ "start": 742,
+ "end": 743
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2020",
+ "confidence": 0.5365304350852966,
+ "start": 758,
+ "end": 759
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6892162561416626,
+ "start": 726,
+ "end": 727
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data collected for 17 of 31 WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.5208715200424194,
+ "start": 767,
+ "end": 774
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9025707244873047,
+ "start": 811,
+ "end": 813
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6752496361732483,
+ "start": 873,
+ "end": 874
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8991137146949768,
+ "start": 773,
+ "end": 774
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\ncounties, and WSP GRSs. WSPs are already required to facilitate community engagement at multiple levels (according to\nboth WASREB license and county contracts) but there is wide variability in the extent to which it is occurring. WSPs will be\nincentivized to implement community engagement mechanisms specified by county contracts and measured by WASREB\nKPIs as a criterion of DLI 6 (Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance\nand have an approved PIAP). Particular attention will be given to complaint resolution mechanisms and efficiency. An\nintermediate result indicator will broadly implement iterative beneficiary monitoring (WSP customers satisfied with their\nwater supply services). The Program will also support community-led BCC through the CLTS approach to assist\ncommunities to achieve ODF status.\n\n\n**V.** **GRIEVANCE REDRESS SERVICE**\n\n\n64. **Grievance Redress.** Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected as a result of a Bank\nsupported PforR operation, as defined by the applicable policy and procedures, may submit complaints to the existing\nprogram grievance mechanism or the Bank’s Grievance Redress Service (GRS). The GRS ensures that complaints received\nare promptly reviewed in order to address pertinent concerns. Project affected communities and individuals may submit\ntheir complaint to the Bank’s independent Accountability Mechanism (AM). The AM houses the Inspection Panel, which\ndetermines whether harm occurred, or could occur, as a result of Bank non-compliance with its policies and\nprocedures, and the Dispute Resolution Service, which provides communities and borrowers with the opportunity to\naddress complaints through dispute resolution. Complaints may be submitted at any time after concerns have been\nbrought directly to the Bank's attention, and Bank Management has been given an opportunity to respond. For\n[information on how to http://www.worldbank.org/GRS. For information on how to submit complaints to the Bank’s](http://www.worldbank.org/GRS)\n[Accountability Mechanism, please visit https://accountability.worldbank.org.](https://accountability.worldbank.org/)\n\n\n**VI.** **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n65. **The overall risk rating of the operation is Substantial.** The main risks and mitigation measures are summarized in\nthe following paragraphs.\n\n\n66. **Political and governance risks are rated Substantial.** While water is a key priority both at the national and county\ngovernment levels, water sector intergovernmental relations remain weak. The Program’s coverage of only 19 out of 47\ncounties could raise some tensions among counties and between the national and county governments including where\nrefugee hosting counties have been prioritized. Additionally, if investments from NAWASIP do not materialize due to\nresource challenges, it may create local political tensions. These risks will be mitigated through continuous engagement\nwith the leaders at both levels of government to ensure sector gains are sustained. In addition, the Program will incentivize\noperationalization of the intergovernmental coordination mechanism through DLI 9. The IPF component will be used to\nsupport policy dialogue including on refugee issues.\n\n\n67. **Macroeconomic risks are rated Substantial.** Rising inflation and tighter global financial conditions have resulted\nin sharp increases in cost of food and fuel, leading to increased price of commodities. Recurrent droughts have serious\nimpact on food security and livelihoods, necessitating need for government intervention. This increases the risk of\ninsufficient government budget allocation for the sector. However, the Program is a top government priority given that\nthe Program activities will help improve livelihoods and resilience of rural communities. In addition, the World Bank is\nundertaking high-level engagement with the GoK to ensure adequate budget allocation to the water sector, including\nthrough the Africa East Regional WASH Scale-up Strategy where attention will be given on adequate allocation of finance\nto the water sector.\n\n\nPage 31 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n68. **The technical design of the Program risk is rated Substantial.** The technical assessment has highlighted several\ntechnical challenges in the sector, including lack of sufficient funds allocated to achieving and sustaining ODF gains; poor\nWASH access in schools and HCFs; inadequate arrangements for the safe collection, transport, treatment and disposal/reuse of fecal sludge; inefficient WSPs with poor financial performance; weak arrangements for the sustainable management\nof rural water supply services, including O&M of infrastructure; weak enabling environment, including on sector policy,\nplanning, coordination and M&E; and lack of involvement of the private sector in service delivery among others. The\nProgram is designed to mitigate these technical risks through the incentives built into the DLIs. DLIs 3, 5, 11, and 12 will\nbe used to incentivize sustaining the gains such as achieving ODF and ensuring that water points remain functional.\nTargeted TA will be provided through the IPF to support the achievement of the DLIs, such as technical support for WSPs\nto improve operational performance and creditworthiness.\n\n\n69. **Institutional capacity for implementation and sustainability risks are** **rated** **Substantial.** As this the first PforR for\nthe sector, there is a general lack of experience in implementing results-based programs. While counties are gaining\nexperience in implementing World Bank-financed projects, County Water Departments and their WSPs have limited\nexperience and high staff turnover further affects implementation capacity. The TA package is set up to support the\nnational government and counties in carrying out activities related to improved planning, staff and systems capacity\nstrengthening, and sustainability.\n\n\n70. **Fiduciary risks are rated Substantial.** There is a persistent funds’ flow challenge from national to county\ngovernments that has negatively affected county-implemented programs. Additionally, lessons from ongoing PforRs in\nKenya show that the monetary incentives are not always correctly transferred from central to local governments. There\nis a risk that county-level departments and WSPs may not receive project funds, irrespective of their performance. The\nProgram will learn from existing PforR operations in Kenya and the region, work closely with the NT, and specify in the\nPAP the rules and procedures that govern the flow of Program funds.\n\n\n71. **Environment and Social risks are rated Substantial.** The E&S risks are related to civil works subprojects under RAs\n1, 2, and 5. These could include soil and water pollution; poor waste management; traffic and other health safety incidents\nand accidents; land/wayleave acquisition without compensation; physical and economic displacement and loss of\nlivelihoods; labor influx and exclusion of some groups from stakeholder consultations or program benefits; sexual\nexploitation and abuse and sexual harassment; inadequate stakeholder engagement and information disclosure; potential\nsocial conflict, especially between refugees and host communities; inadequate, ineffective, or inaccessible grievance\nredress and feedback mechanisms, especially for refugees; weak E&S capacity of the PMU and PIUs; and the E&S gaps\nidentified in the institutions responsible for managing ESHS risks in the country. To mitigate such risks, the Program will\nexclude high risks subprojects; develop an ESHS manual to guide screening and management of E&S risks; integrate\ninstitutions with mandate for E&S risk management early into Program activities; ensure that E&S risk management\nstrategies are incorporated at an early stage in the planning process; allocate adequately skilled and experienced E&S staff\nand financial resources for implementing E&S risk management; involve DRS and the UNHCR in host community and\nrefugee areas and ensure the operation GRM is practical and can effectively mitigate any conflicts among refugees and\nbetween refugees and host communities; and undertake capacity building of the PMU and PIUs on E&S risk management\nand monitoring.\n\n\n72. **Other risks are rated Substantial.** While offering a range of benefits to refugee protection in Kenya, the Refugees\nAct of 2021 contains elements that are not fully compliant with the relevant provisions of the 1951 Refugee Convention.\nThere are protection risks regarding delays or restrictions on the access to asylum for some individuals, constraints on the\nfreedom of movement, and lack of simplified access to labor markets. Ongoing access to sufficient land within the\nproposed integrated municipalities presents a substantial risk, as does social cohesion risks on the access to water and\n\n\nPage 32 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nother resources such as firewood between refugees and host communities. The refugee-related risks will be managed\nthrough the IPF component, policy dialogue with the Government-led DRS, and joint engagement with relevant agencies\nsuch as the UNHCR and other stakeholders supporting the development of both the Shirika Plan and Refugee\nRegulations. [51] In addition, the World Bank, in collaboration with DRS and the UNHCR, will undertake periodic reviews of\nKenya’s refugee policy and institutional environment under its Refugee Policy Review Framework. K-WASH will be\nimplemented in counties that often experience intermittent border security flare-ups including cattle rustling and conflicts\nover scarce resources such as pasture and water (such as Turkana, Samburu, West Pokot, and Baringo). In Garissa and\nMandera, security risks related to inter-clan conflicts over water and pasture and potential terrorist attacks may be\nanticipated. These security risks could potentially be exacerbated by Program activities especially if some areas where\npossible clans should feel that they have been excluded from Program benefits and could potentially delay or disrupt\nimplementation. To mitigate this risk, County PIUs will work closely with the respective county security apparatus in\nimplementing Program activities. In addition, the PMU will undertake a security risk assessment and prepare a Security\nManagement Plan prior to commencement of any Project activities in these counties.\n\n\n51 As noted in the UNHCR’s Refugee Protection Assessment Update 5, from January to June 2023.\n\n\nPage 33 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n\n**ANNEX 1. RESULTS FRAMEWORK MATRIX**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Baseline|Period 1|Period 2|Period 3|Period 4|Period 5|Period 6|Closing Period|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|**Increased sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural households**|\n|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members)**
**(Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|50000|500000|1000000|2000000|3000000|3500000|4000000|\n|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are female (Number)|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|25000|250000|500000|1000000|1500000|1750000|2000000|\n|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program who are refugees (Number)|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|5000|15000|45000|95000|145000|175000|200000|\n|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|\n|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|200|1200|2200|3200|3900|4100|4100|\n|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (disaggregated by gender, refugees, and host community members) (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|May/2030|\n|0|50000|500000|1000000|2000000|3000000|3500000|4000000|\n|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|➢People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are female (Number)|\n\n\nPage 34 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|May/2030|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|0|25000|250000|500000|1000000|1500000|1750000|2000000|\n|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|➢(i) People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services who are refugees (Number)|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|May/2030|\n|0|5000|15000|45000|95000|145000|175000|200000|\n|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|\n|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number)DLI **|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|5|10|15|20|25|25|25|\n\n\n\n\n\n|Baseline|Period 1|Period 2|Period 3|Period 4|Period 5|Period 6|Closing Period|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|**Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas**|\n|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|58|200|400|600|800|900|1000|\n|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to improved water services (Number)DLI **|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|40000|140000|240000|390000|590000|720000|820000|\n|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|19|19|19|19|19|19|19|\n|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|0|200|400|600|800|900|1000|\n|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that addopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses beyond domestic portable water**
**supply) (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|17|60|120|180|240|270|300|\n|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|\n|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n\n\nPage 35 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.9135971665382385,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9042664766311646,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "access to improved sanitation services who are refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6842285394668579,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 158
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9364606142044067,
+ "start": 325,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "approved Performance Improvement Action Plans",
+ "confidence": 0.8195596933364868,
+ "start": 469,
+ "end": 474
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Water Supply Providers",
+ "confidence": 0.9066469073295593,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 455
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "approved Performance Improvement Action Plans",
+ "confidence": 0.5385507345199585,
+ "start": 624,
+ "end": 629
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Water Supply Providers",
+ "confidence": 0.8646031618118286,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 610
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.8587912917137146,
+ "start": 937,
+ "end": 941
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.8182734251022339,
+ "start": 816,
+ "end": 819
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7230385541915894,
+ "start": 832,
+ "end": 835
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.861397922039032,
+ "start": 1057,
+ "end": 1061
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5828636288642883,
+ "start": 1066,
+ "end": 1069
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.537925124168396,
+ "start": 1148,
+ "end": 1149
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Households provided with access to improved water services",
+ "confidence": 0.9415854215621948,
+ "start": 1148,
+ "end": 1156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.8012285232543945,
+ "start": 1148,
+ "end": 1149
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "provided with access to improved water services",
+ "confidence": 0.8079931735992432,
+ "start": 1200,
+ "end": 1207
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.6927160024642944,
+ "start": 1216,
+ "end": 1217
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans",
+ "confidence": 0.7781310677528381,
+ "start": 1335,
+ "end": 1343
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.8399991393089294,
+ "start": 1522,
+ "end": 1528
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.9813087582588196,
+ "start": 1685,
+ "end": 1689
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.9747102856636047,
+ "start": 1811,
+ "end": 1815
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.946114718914032,
+ "start": 1979,
+ "end": 1983
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural",
+ "confidence": 0.7143964767456055,
+ "start": 2083,
+ "end": 2085
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.6418647766113281,
+ "start": 2020,
+ "end": 2023
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n|0|40000|140000|240000|390000|590000|720000|820000|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public early childhood development centres and primary schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|100|200|400|600|800|900|1000|\n|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI **|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|40000|140000|240000|390000|590000|720000|820000|\n|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|100|200|400|600|800|900|1000|\n|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the program (Number) (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|10|30|50|70|90|100|100|\n|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved operational and financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|\n|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|10|33|33|33|33|33|33|\n|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2028|Jun/2023|\n|0|10|33|33|33|33|33|33|\n|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in leadership positions (Percentage)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|30|30|100|100|100|100|100|100|\n|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|**Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number)DLI **|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|0|0|US$1,000,000|US$3,000,000|US$6,000,000|US$8,000,000|US$8,000,000|\n|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage)**|\n|Dec/2023|||||||Jun/2030|\n|0|||||||100|\n|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|\n|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|**NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Text)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|None|none|none|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|\n|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Text)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n\n\n\nPage 36 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.8936707973480225,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8134318590164185,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "with access to an improved sanitation facility",
+ "confidence": 0.6252591609954834,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.5865329504013062,
+ "start": 441,
+ "end": 444
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.8629024624824524,
+ "start": 316,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural Healthcare Facilities provided with adequate WASH facilities",
+ "confidence": 0.9602028727531433,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 501
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "the legal and regulatory requirements",
+ "confidence": 0.5030148029327393,
+ "start": 1050,
+ "end": 1055
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services",
+ "confidence": 0.7357672452926636,
+ "start": 1942,
+ "end": 1950
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services",
+ "confidence": 0.9350773692131042,
+ "start": 1958,
+ "end": 1966
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.9337080717086792,
+ "start": 2069,
+ "end": 2072
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NAWASIP Performance-based Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved",
+ "confidence": 0.8731488585472107,
+ "start": 2250,
+ "end": 2257
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual water sector M&E report",
+ "confidence": 0.9996471405029297,
+ "start": 2421,
+ "end": 2428
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.7689980268478394,
+ "start": 2427,
+ "end": 2428
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.7708097696304321,
+ "start": 2572,
+ "end": 2575
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual water sector M&E report",
+ "confidence": 0.9901345372200012,
+ "start": 2554,
+ "end": 2561
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.7394092082977295,
+ "start": 2560,
+ "end": 2561
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.8207908272743225,
+ "start": 2572,
+ "end": 2575
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n\n|None|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Text)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|None|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|YES|\n|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|\n|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|20|50|100|150|180|200|200|\n|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|8780|30732|52683|85610|129512|158049|180000|\n|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|➢out of which are refugee households (Number)|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Mar/2030|\n|0|4000|14000|24000|39000|59000|70000|80000|\n|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|20|50|100|150|180|200|200|\n|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the Program (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|8,780|30,732|52,683|85,610|129,512|158,049|180000|\n|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|10|30|50|70|90|100|100|\n|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2028|Dec/2029||Jun/2023|\n|0|10|30|50|70|90||100|\n|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)**|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Jun/2030|\n|0|8,780|30,732|52,683|85,610|129,512|158,049|180000|\n|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|➢out of which are refugees (Number)|\n|Dec/2023|Dec/2024|Dec/2025|Dec/2026|Dec/2027|Dec/2028|Dec/2029|Oct/2030|\n|0|4,000|14,000|24,000|39,000|59,000|70,000|80000|\n|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|**Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties to provide integrated refugee-host community WASH services (Text)**|\n|Dec/2023|||||||Jun/2030|\n\n\n\nPage 37 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.870140790939331,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8314641714096069,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events",
+ "confidence": 0.9308145642280579,
+ "start": 71,
+ "end": 78
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events",
+ "confidence": 0.5996824502944946,
+ "start": 161,
+ "end": 168
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.7723153829574585,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 354
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9779460430145264,
+ "start": 352,
+ "end": 354
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.8553020358085632,
+ "start": 461,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.6342117786407471,
+ "start": 466,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water services",
+ "confidence": 0.7504989504814148,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.6490024924278259,
+ "start": 709,
+ "end": 712
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee households",
+ "confidence": 0.9418839812278748,
+ "start": 764,
+ "end": 766
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.7367841005325317,
+ "start": 1087,
+ "end": 1093
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9659428596496582,
+ "start": 1091,
+ "end": 1093
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2027",
+ "confidence": 0.6221454739570618,
+ "start": 1051,
+ "end": 1054
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "counties constructed under the Program",
+ "confidence": 0.8033196330070496,
+ "start": 1200,
+ "end": 1205
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "provided with access to an improved sanitation facility",
+ "confidence": 0.8227694034576416,
+ "start": 1800,
+ "end": 1808
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas",
+ "confidence": 0.73524010181427,
+ "start": 1818,
+ "end": 1820
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "Dec/2023",
+ "confidence": 0.7586763501167297,
+ "start": 1855,
+ "end": 1858
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5890734791755676,
+ "start": 2062,
+ "end": 2069
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6801469922065735,
+ "start": 1952,
+ "end": 1953
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.6976833343505859,
+ "start": 2106,
+ "end": 2113
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2023",
+ "confidence": 0.661254346370697,
+ "start": 2239,
+ "end": 2240
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water service providers established by refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5081459283828735,
+ "start": 2150,
+ "end": 2157
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Period|Period Definition|Timeline|\n|---|---|---|\n|Period 0|Project Approval|2023|\n|Period 1|Program year 1|2024|\n|Period 2|Program year 2|2025|\n|Period 3|Program year 3|2026|\n|Period 4|Program year 4|2027|\n|Period 5|Program year 5|2028|\n|Period 6|Program year 6|2029|\n|Period 7|Program year 6|2030|\n\n\n|Baseline|Period 0|Period 1|Period 2|Period 3|Period 4|Period 5|Period 6|Period 7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|**1 : Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP) (Number )**|\n|0|0|19|0|0|0|0|0|0|\n|0.00|0.00|19,000,000.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|19,000,000.00|19,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|8.3%|8.3%|\n|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|**2 : Households provided with access to improved water services (Number )**|\n|0|0|40000|100,000|100,000|150,000|200,000|130,000|100,000|\n|0.00|0.00|1,600,000.00|4,000,000.00|4,000,000.00|6,000,000.00|8,000,000.00|5,200,000.00|4,000,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|32,800,000.00|32,800,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|14.0%|14.0%|\n|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|**3 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes (Number )**|\n|0|0|0|200|200|200|200|100|100|\n|0.00|0.00|0.00|1,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|3,000,000.00|4,000,000.00|4,500,000.00|5,500,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|20,000,000.00|20,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|9.0%|9.0%|\n|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|**4 : Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )**|\n\n\nPage 38 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n|0|0|40,000|100,000|100,000|150,000|200,000|130,000|100,000|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|0.00|0.00|1,200,000.00|3,000,000.00|3,000,000.00|4,500,000.00|6,000,000.00|3,900,000.00|3,000,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|24,600,000.00|24,600,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|13.0%|13.0%|\n|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|**5 : Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )**|\n|0|0|1|1|1|1|1|1|1|\n|0.00|0.00|4,060,000.00|5,660,000.00|9,320,000.00|9,320,000.00|8,720,000.00|4,060,000.00|3,660,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|44,800,000.00|44,800,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|19.0%|19.0%|\n|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|➢ 5.1 : Villages achieving Open defecation free status (Number )|\n|0|0|200|1000|1000|1000|700|200|0|\n|0.00|0.00|400,000.00|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|1,400,000.00|400,000.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|8,200,000.00|8,200,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|4.0%|4.0%|\n|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.2 : Villages that achieve community-wide sanitation status (Number )|\n|0|0|100|100|200|200|200|100|100|\n|0.00|0.00|2,460,000.00|2,460,000.00|4,920,000.00|4,920,000.00|4,920,000.00|2,460,000.00|2,460,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|24,600,000.00|24,600,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|11.0%|11.0%|\n|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|➢ 5.3 : Villages that sustain community-wide sanitation status (Number )|\n|0|0|100|100|200|200|200|100|100|\n|0.00|0.00|1,200,000.00|1,200,000.00|2,400,000.00|2,400,000.00|2,400,000.00|1,200,000.00|1,200,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|12,000,000.00|12,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|5.0%|5.0%|\n|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|**6 : Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP (Number )**|\n|0|0|10|23|0|0|0|0|0|\n|0.00|0.00|4,090,900.00|9,409,070.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|13,500,000.00|13,500,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|6.0%|6.0%|\n|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|**7 : Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio target as per their approved Performance Improvement Action Plans (Number )**|\n|0|0|33|33|33|33|33|33|0|\n|0.00|0.00|3,716,663.50|3,716,663.50|3,716,663.50|3,716,663.50|3,716,663.50|3,716,663.50|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|22,300,011.00|22,300,011.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|13.0%|13.0%|\n|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|**8 : Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing sources (Number )**|\n|0|0|0|0|1|1|0|1|1|\n|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|1,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|3,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|8,000,000.00|8,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|2.0%|2.0%|\n|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|**9 : Water sector intergovernmental planning, coordination and monitoring reforms implemented (Text )**|\n\n\n\nPage 39 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status",
+ "confidence": 0.7612802386283875,
+ "start": 215,
+ "end": 223
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.6834924221038818,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Villages achieving Open defecation free status",
+ "confidence": 0.7166344523429871,
+ "start": 520,
+ "end": 526
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Villages",
+ "confidence": 0.801755964756012,
+ "start": 520,
+ "end": 521
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "status",
+ "confidence": 0.5095678567886353,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 601
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Villages",
+ "confidence": 0.5867519974708557,
+ "start": 610,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.5206854939460754,
+ "start": 1004,
+ "end": 1006
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Villages",
+ "confidence": 0.5390256643295288,
+ "start": 909,
+ "end": 910
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.7863996624946594,
+ "start": 1281,
+ "end": 1283
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8489154577255249,
+ "start": 1344,
+ "end": 1345
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regulatory requirements for good governance",
+ "confidence": 0.6234068870544434,
+ "start": 1350,
+ "end": 1355
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.991015613079071,
+ "start": 1372,
+ "end": 1373
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "approved Performance Improvement Action Plans",
+ "confidence": 0.770217776298523,
+ "start": 1733,
+ "end": 1738
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Water Supply Providers",
+ "confidence": 0.9706577658653259,
+ "start": 1716,
+ "end": 1719
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Cost Coverage Ratio target",
+ "confidence": 0.8005973696708679,
+ "start": 1950,
+ "end": 1954
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Water Supply Providers",
+ "confidence": 0.8196332454681396,
+ "start": 1972,
+ "end": 1975
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.7384716272354126,
+ "start": 2081,
+ "end": 2083
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSPs from private/commercial financing sources",
+ "confidence": 0.5336577892303467,
+ "start": 2147,
+ "end": 2154
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.7656431198120117,
+ "start": 2409,
+ "end": 2411
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n|0|0|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|0.00|0.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|2,500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|5,000,000.00|5,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|1.0%|1.0%|\n|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|➢ 9.1 : Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No )|\n|0|0|no|no|yes|no|no|no|no|\n|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|2,000,000.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|1.0%|1.0%|\n|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|➢ 9.2 : Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework including joint M&E reporting (Text )|\n|0|0|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|yes|\n|0.00|0.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|500,000.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|3,000,000.00|3,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|1.0%|1.0%|\n|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|**10 : Number of refugee and host community households in Refugee Hosting Counties provided with improved access to WASH services (Number )**|\n|0|0|1|1|1|1|1|1|1|\n|0.00|0.00|975,600.00|2,439,000.00|2,439,000.00|3,658,500.00|4,878,000.00|3,170,700.00|2,439,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|20,000,000.00|20,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|14.0%|14.0%|\n|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|➢ 10.1 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to improved water services under the Program (Number )|\n|0|0|8,780|21,951|21,951|32,927|43,902|28,537|21,951|\n|0.00|0.00|536,576.00|1,341,439.00|1,341,439.00|2,012,159.00|2,682,878.00|1,743,871.00|1,341,439.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|11,000,000.00|11,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|5.0%|5.0%|\n|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|➢ 10.2 : Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number )|\n|0|0|8,780|21,951|21,951|32,927|43,902|28,537|21,951|\n|0.00|0.00|439,024.00|1,097,561.00|1,097,561.00|1,646,341.00|2,195,122.00|1,426,829.00|1,097,561.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|9,000,000.00|9,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|4.0%|4.0%|\n|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|**11 : Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting Counties (Number )**|\n|0|0|20|30|50|50|30|20|0|\n|0.00|0.00|800,000.00|1,200,000.00|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|1,200,000.00|800,000.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|8,000,000.00|8,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|3.0%|3.0%|\n|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|**12 : Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number )**|\n|0|0|1|1|1|1|1|1|1|\n|0.00|0.00|1,200,000.00|2,400,000.00|2,400,000.00|2,400,000.00|2,400,000.00|700,000.00|500,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|12,000,000.00|12,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|5.0%|5.0%|\n|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|➢ 12.1 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving ODF status (Number )|\n\n\n\nPage 40 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.8527104258537292,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8304422497749329,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.9033687114715576,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.9745709896087646,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 305
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.5808443427085876,
+ "start": 500,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.5482100248336792,
+ "start": 523,
+ "end": 528
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.692437469959259,
+ "start": 615,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.5106201171875,
+ "start": 768,
+ "end": 770
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.5364993810653687,
+ "start": 1160,
+ "end": 1162
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Refugee Hosting Counties",
+ "confidence": 0.753779411315918,
+ "start": 1061,
+ "end": 1064
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee and host community households",
+ "confidence": 0.8690235614776611,
+ "start": 1055,
+ "end": 1060
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.6020888090133667,
+ "start": 1602,
+ "end": 1604
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee camps",
+ "confidence": 0.7902674078941345,
+ "start": 1669,
+ "end": 1671
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8730593323707581,
+ "start": 1666,
+ "end": 1667
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Number of sustainably functioning water schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.5056692957878113,
+ "start": 2087,
+ "end": 2093
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting Counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9797555208206177,
+ "start": 2094,
+ "end": 2096
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DLI allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.7189737558364868,
+ "start": 2331,
+ "end": 2333
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee camps",
+ "confidence": 0.6819679141044617,
+ "start": 2397,
+ "end": 2399
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CWS status",
+ "confidence": 0.5587816834449768,
+ "start": 2408,
+ "end": 2410
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee camps",
+ "confidence": 0.5770993828773499,
+ "start": 2425,
+ "end": 2427
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7702490091323853,
+ "start": 2403,
+ "end": 2405
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program(P179012)\n\n|0|0|100|200|200|200|200|100|0|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|0.00|0.00|200,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|200,000.00|0.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|1.0%|1.0%|\n|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.2 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities achieving CWS status (Number )|\n|0|0|40|80|80|80|80|20|20|\n|0.00|0.00|800,000.00|1,600,000.00|1,600,000.00|1,600,000.00|1,600,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|8,000,000.00|8,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|3.0%|3.0%|\n|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|➢ 12.3 : Villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities sustaining CWS status (Number )|\n|0|0|40|80|80|80|80|20|20|\n|0.00|0.00|200,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|400,000.00|100,000.00|100,000.00|\n|DLI allocation|DLI allocation|2,000,000.00|2,000,000.00|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|As a % of Total Financing Amount|1.0%|1.0%|\n\n\n\nPage 41 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**Monitoring & Evaluation Plan: PDO Indicators by PDO Outcomes**\n\n|Increased sustainable access to improved water services for rural households in selected counties|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (Number) **|**People provided with sustainable access to improved climate resilient water services under the Program (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of people who access to water from an improved and climate resilient
water source that have been constructed through the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of open defecation**|\n|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number) **|**Villages that achieve and sustain open defecation free (ODF) status (Number) **|\n|Description|ODF status requires (a) no exposed human excreta within the community/households, (b) all households have access
to a toilet (individual or shared), and (c) all households have a handwashing facility near the latrine with soap/ash and
water.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed CLTS M&E protocols|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (Number)CRI**|**People provided with sustainable access to improved sanitation services (Number)CRI**|\n|Description|The indicator measures the cumulative number of people who have been provided with access to an improved
sanitation facility through the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|**Improved financial performance of Water Services Providers in participating counties**|\n|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operational Cost Coverage Ratio (OCCR) target as per their approved PIAPs (Number)**
**DLI**|**Water Supply Providers that achieve 100 percent of their Operational Cost Coverage Ratio (OCCR) target as per their approved PIAPs (Number)**
**DLI**|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of WSPs that have made improvements in operational and financial performance
and reached at least 100 percent OCCR.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, WSP|\n\n\n\nPage 42 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PDO Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9291039109230042,
+ "start": 25,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8092128038406372,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural households",
+ "confidence": 0.9262632727622986,
+ "start": 41,
+ "end": 43
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.8240423202514648,
+ "start": 148,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water department",
+ "confidence": 0.6114577054977417,
+ "start": 148,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9899790287017822,
+ "start": 344,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Department of Health",
+ "confidence": 0.513970673084259,
+ "start": 385,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9581020474433899,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MoH-prescribed CLTS M&E protocols",
+ "confidence": 0.54680335521698,
+ "start": 369,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Department of Health",
+ "confidence": 0.5441775321960449,
+ "start": 385,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural",
+ "confidence": 0.6017506718635559,
+ "start": 499,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.5380429029464722,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.6144245266914368,
+ "start": 468,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Department of Health",
+ "confidence": 0.5010581016540527,
+ "start": 515,
+ "end": 520
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5355434417724609,
+ "start": 532,
+ "end": 534
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7041293382644653,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9402556419372559,
+ "start": 670,
+ "end": 675
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9363397359848022,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**Monitoring & Evaluation Plan: Intermediate Results Indicators by Results Areas**\n\n|Increasing sustainable access to improved water services for climate-vulnerable rural areas|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number) **|**County water and sanitation strategy and investment plans approved (Number) **|\n|Description|The county government executive approved 5-year strategy and investment plan and the implementation roadmap will
guide both public and private investments in water supply and sanitation services toward achieving the universal
access target by 2030.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number) **|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program in climate-vulnerable rural areas (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural water schemes constructed by each county to supply improved water to
households.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|||\n|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that adopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses**
**beyond doemstic portable water supply) (Number) **|**Rural water supply schemes constructed under the program that adopt a WASH plus approach (provide water for multiple productive uses**
**beyond doemstic portable water supply) (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural water schemes constructed by each county that provide water for
productive uses such as irrigation and so on beyond domestic portable water supply.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Climate-vulnerable households provided with access to improved water services (Number) DLI**|**Climate-vulnerable households provided with access to improved water services (Number) DLI**|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households that have access to an improved water source
constructed through the program. The definition of a household as applied in the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health
Survey (KDHS) applies. The KDHS indicates that the mean household size in rural areas is four people.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number) **|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator primarily measures the number of water schemes in the participating counties that are operated under
an approved professional service provider model as per WASREB regulations. This is to ensure functionality of the
schemes with functionality defined in the POM.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n\n\n\nPage 43 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.5566715002059937,
+ "start": 148,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection",
+ "confidence": 0.6573489904403687,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2030",
+ "confidence": 0.6090261936187744,
+ "start": 135,
+ "end": 136
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.6299704313278198,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.6256888508796692,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 195
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "climate-vulnerable rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.55498868227005,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8219426870346069,
+ "start": 261,
+ "end": 262
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9902597069740295,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 466
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.6049301028251648,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 462
+ },
+ "producer": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.8474978804588318,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 462
+ },
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5133015513420105,
+ "start": 580,
+ "end": 581
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Climate-vulnerable households",
+ "confidence": 0.7581632733345032,
+ "start": 509,
+ "end": 511
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9923185110092163,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.8617735505104065,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "producer": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.8174397945404053,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.6000282764434814,
+ "start": 710,
+ "end": 712
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.6108351945877075,
+ "start": 651,
+ "end": 652
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.7206322550773621,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating counties",
+ "confidence": 0.7797209024429321,
+ "start": 710,
+ "end": 712
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9610181450843811,
+ "start": 759,
+ "end": 767
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.5054362416267395,
+ "start": 787,
+ "end": 788
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection",
+ "confidence": 0.5769966244697571,
+ "start": 773,
+ "end": 779
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Collection|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|**Increased sustainable access to improved sanitation services and elimination of OD in climate-vulnerable rural**|\n|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the Program (Number) **|**Improved sanitation facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the Program (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of individual household-level improved sanitation facilities constructed
by beneficiaries of the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the Program (Number) **|**Fecal sludge treatment facilities constructed and/or rehabilitated under the Program (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of fecal sludge treatment plants for safe treatment and disposal of fecal sludge
from houseolds, schools, HCF constructed under the Program. These include decentralized treatment facilities (DTFs)
that are designed to the acceptale minimum design standards.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department|\n|**Rural public schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|**Rural public schools provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural public schools provided with adequate WASH facilities as per GoK
standards and guidelines.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH, MoE, M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using prescribed M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI**|**Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number)DLI**|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households who are provided with an improved sanitation facility
that has been constructed under the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Rural HCFs provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|**Rural HCFs provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural HCFs provided with adequate WASH facilities as per GoK standards and
guidelines.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using prescribed M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data|County Government Department of Health|\n\n\n\nPage 44 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.6374089121818542,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5741710662841797,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.8191162347793579,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 168
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.957206130027771,
+ "start": 321,
+ "end": 329
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.534559965133667,
+ "start": 321,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Rural public schools",
+ "confidence": 0.9336702227592468,
+ "start": 372,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.5263803601264954,
+ "start": 353,
+ "end": 354
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Rural public schools",
+ "confidence": 0.7852782011032104,
+ "start": 372,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.5116299390792847,
+ "start": 575,
+ "end": 579
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.9750794172286987,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 497
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.5776790380477905,
+ "start": 696,
+ "end": 700
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Department of Health",
+ "confidence": 0.521406888961792,
+ "start": 618,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Rural HCFs",
+ "confidence": 0.9727909564971924,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 629
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Collection|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**Improved financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|**Improved financial performance of Water Service Providers in participating Counties**|\n|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number) **|**WSPs that are fully compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of WSPs that comply with the relevant legal and regulatory requirements,
including mandated gender diversity in the WSP workforce and community consultation and grievance redress.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, WSP|\n|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number) **|**WSPs with a Board of Directors approved Performance Improvement Action Plan (PIAP) (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of WSPs which have an approved PIAP which contains (a) a diagnostic of factors
influencing WSP’s financial performance, (b) identification and prioritization of costed activities, and (c) a set target for
OCCR improvement that the PIAP.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government WaterDdepartment, WSP|\n|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in skilled and leadership positions (Percentage) **|**WSPs with at least 1/3 share of women in skilled and leadership positions (Percentage) **|\n|Description|This measures the percentage of women from the total personnel in those positions. Eligible positions include technical
(medium and high skilled), management, and other leadership (such as Board of Director) positions. The percentage of
women in these positions are tracked for each WSP. The percentage of WSPs with at least one-third women in such
positions is reported.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, WSP|\n|**Financing mobilized by WSPs from commercial fincancing to improve water services (Text)DLI**|**Financing mobilized by WSPs from commercial fincancing to improve water services (Text)DLI**|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative amount (in Kenya shillings) of matching grants for commercial financing
leveraged by WSPs. For the corresponding DLI, US$1,000,000 per WSP to match an equal amount leveraged from
private capital for up to 5 WSPs.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP and Water Fund M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, WSP, and Water Fund|\n|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage) **|**WSP customers satisfied with their water supply services (Percentage) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of WSPs that measure at least 80% satisfaction in customers supplied by WSPs
under the Program in the areas of continuity and reliability of supply, water quality, and cost. Monitoring includes
metadata on the nature of service problems, time to resolution, and other elements as defined in the County-WSP
contract.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|WSP M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n\n\n\nPage 45 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.968248188495636,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.751386284828186,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9676809906959534,
+ "start": 66,
+ "end": 67
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9917782545089722,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government WaterDdepartment",
+ "confidence": 0.5226276516914368,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 358
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9143664240837097,
+ "start": 364,
+ "end": 365
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9882603883743286,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 503
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6901330351829529,
+ "start": 597,
+ "end": 598
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9620333909988403,
+ "start": 472,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP and Water Fund M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.8924404978752136,
+ "start": 656,
+ "end": 664
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WSP and Water Fund",
+ "confidence": 0.703070342540741,
+ "start": 656,
+ "end": 660
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "metadata",
+ "confidence": 0.5378760099411011,
+ "start": 792,
+ "end": 793
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6083274483680725,
+ "start": 643,
+ "end": 644
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.967741072177887,
+ "start": 828,
+ "end": 833
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "customers",
+ "confidence": 0.7919582724571228,
+ "start": 761,
+ "end": 762
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Collection|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, WSP|\n|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|**Improving Sector reforms, coordination and M&E Capacity for integrated water management**|\n|**NAWASIP Performance-based intergovernment Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Number) **|**NAWASIP Performance-based intergovernment Fiscal Transfer Mechanism approved (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the approval by the Cabinet of a new performance-based financing mechanisms for fiscal
transfers from the National Government to the counties for the implementation of NAWASIP activities.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|MoWSI (SDWS) M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Records of approval of the mechanism|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|MoWSI (SDWS)|\n|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Number) **|**Annual water sector M&E report prepared and publicly launched (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of water sector M&E progress reports toward achievement of SDGs in Kenya
jointly published every year by the Council of Governors (CoG)and the MoWSI (SDWS).|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|MOWSI (SDWS) M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Records of approval of the mechanism|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|MOWSI (SDWS) and Council of Govenors (CoG)|\n|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Number) **|**Water Sector intergovernmental coordination meetings/events (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of water sector M&E progress reports toward achievement of SDGs in Kenya
jointly published every year by the CoG and the MOWSI (SDWS).|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|MOWSI (SDWS) M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Records of approval of the mechanism|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|MOWSI (SDWS) and CoG|\n|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|**Improving integrated WASH services for refugee hosting counties**|\n|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number) **|**Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural water schemes constructed by refugee-hosting counties to supply
improved water to households in both refugee and host communities.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, DRS|\n|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number) **|**Households in refugee hosting areas provided with access to improved water services (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households who have access to water from an improved water
source that have been constructed through the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data|County Government Water Department, DRS|\n\n\n\nPage 46 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MoWSI (SDWS) M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9503649473190308,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "SDWS",
+ "confidence": 0.5304287672042847,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 169
+ },
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Council of Governors (CoG)",
+ "confidence": 0.5811067223548889,
+ "start": 275,
+ "end": 281
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9904560446739197,
+ "start": 265,
+ "end": 266
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Records of approval of the mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.5956502556800842,
+ "start": 184,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Records of approval of the mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.5518564581871033,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 323
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MOWSI (SDWS) M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.5169644355773926,
+ "start": 426,
+ "end": 434
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "SDWS",
+ "confidence": 0.5140571594238281,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 302
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9809943437576294,
+ "start": 397,
+ "end": 398
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5858080387115479,
+ "start": 497,
+ "end": 504
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.5314726233482361,
+ "start": 576,
+ "end": 580
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.7549309134483337,
+ "start": 502,
+ "end": 504
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8734812140464783,
+ "start": 557,
+ "end": 558
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.7017830014228821,
+ "start": 576,
+ "end": 584
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department, DRS",
+ "confidence": 0.518925666809082,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 625
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8502050638198853,
+ "start": 557,
+ "end": 558
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.7750465869903564,
+ "start": 710,
+ "end": 718
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.5121501088142395,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.8224761486053467,
+ "start": 629,
+ "end": 630
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Collection|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**out of which are refugee households (Number) **|**out of which are refugee households (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households who are classified as refugees who have access to water
from an improved water source that has been constructed through the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, DRS|\n|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number) **|**Sustainably functioning rural water supply schemes in refugee-hosting areas (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator primarily measures the number of water schemes in the refugee-hosting counties that are operated
under an approved professional service provider model as per WASREB regulations. This is to ensure functionality of
the schemes with functionality defined in the POM.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government Water Department M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Water Department, DRS|\n|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number) **|**Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties constructed under the program (Number) **|\n|Description|The indicator measures the cumulative number of people in refugee-hosting counties who have been provided with
access to an improved sanitation facility through the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|**Rural public schools in refugee hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural public schools in refugee-hosting areas provided with adequate WASH
facilities as per GoK standards and guidelines.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH, MoE, M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using prescribed M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|**Rural HCFs in refugee-hosting counties provided with adequate WASH facilities (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the number of rural HCFs in refugee-hosting areas provided with adequate WASH facilities as
per GoK standards and guidelines.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using prescribed M&E protocols defined in the POM|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number) **|**Households in refugee-hosting areas provided with access to an improved sanitation facility (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households in refugee-hosting counties who are provided with an|\n\n\n\nPage 47 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.530354380607605,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6634409427642822,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee households",
+ "confidence": 0.8231619596481323,
+ "start": 39,
+ "end": 41
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.8417815566062927,
+ "start": 257,
+ "end": 265
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Water Department",
+ "confidence": 0.5332667231559753,
+ "start": 152,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9071290493011475,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 210
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.5006861686706543,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9264020919799805,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 210
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Improved sanitation facilities in refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.821577787399292,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9251522421836853,
+ "start": 314,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6333469152450562,
+ "start": 348,
+ "end": 349
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas",
+ "confidence": 0.6177168488502502,
+ "start": 494,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Rural public schools",
+ "confidence": 0.5794833302497864,
+ "start": 443,
+ "end": 446
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.6385777592658997,
+ "start": 652,
+ "end": 660
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "County Government Department of Health",
+ "confidence": 0.7110334038734436,
+ "start": 696,
+ "end": 701
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5582820177078247,
+ "start": 624,
+ "end": 626
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural HCFs",
+ "confidence": 0.6384825706481934,
+ "start": 621,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cumulative number of households",
+ "confidence": 0.5166381597518921,
+ "start": 750,
+ "end": 754
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9640041589736938,
+ "start": 755,
+ "end": 757
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9063253998756409,
+ "start": 753,
+ "end": 754
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Col1|improved sanitation facility that has been constructed under the Program.|\n|---|---|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n|**out of which are refugees (Number) **|**out of which are refugees (Number) **|\n|Description|This indicator measures the cumulative number of households who are categolrized by government as refugees
provided with an improved sanitation facility that has been constructed under the Program.|\n|Frequency|Annual measurement|\n|Data source|County Government, MoH M&E records|\n|Methodology for Data
Collection|Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection using MoH-prescribed M&E protocols for rural sanitation
facilities|\n|Responsibility for Data
Collection|County Government Department of Health|\n\n\n\nPage 48 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.9820446968078613,
+ "start": 52,
+ "end": 60
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8503244519233704,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9387469291687012,
+ "start": 142,
+ "end": 143
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Government, MoH M&E records",
+ "confidence": 0.603313148021698,
+ "start": 178,
+ "end": 186
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Qualitative inspections and quantitative data collection",
+ "confidence": 0.5041680335998535,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 202
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**ANNEX 2. DISBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND VERIFICATION PROTOCOL**\n\n|1: Number of counties that have an approved County Water and Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan (CWSS&IP)|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|Formula|US$1,000,000 per county upon adoption of the CWSS&IP|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made to the counties when a CWSS&IP and implementation roadmap are formally
adopted and approved for implementation by the CEC. The CWSS&IP will be prepared according to a defined
template in the POM and will contain at a minimum (a) a diagnosis of the current WASH access situation,
policy and institutional constraints, and a scenario analysis of how the county can achieve universal access
to WASH; (b) establishment of the institutional structure for water resources management and WASH service
delivery in rural and urban areas of the county including definition of how the county will use different service
provision models as per WASREB regulations/guidelines; (c) detailed investments the county intends to
implement to achieve universal access to WASH based on the scenario analysis with details of locations,
budgets, WASH+ approach, and climate resilience; and (d) financing plan for the strategy.|\n|Data source/ Agency|County Government, MoWSI (SDWS)|\n|Verification Entity|Externaly hired IVA|\n|Procedure|For each county, results will be verified through desk-based review of the Approved County Water and
Sanitation Strategy, investment plan, and implementation roadmap to ensure that it conforms to the
provided template, minutes of the CEC meeting, and a signed letter from the County Governor to the MoWSI
Cabinet Secretary confirming approval and launch and desk review of county annual program-based budgets.|\n|**2: Number of households provided with access to improved water services**|**2: Number of households provided with access to improved water services**|\n|Formula|US$40 per household provided with access to an improved water service|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made proportionate to the number of households provided with access to improved
water services out of water supply schemes that meet the following conditions: (a) the household served is
in a rural area; (b) the water supply scheme has technical designs meeting the minimum design checklist as
defined in the POM, before procurement and construction; (c) the water scheme complies with water quality
standards issued by WASREB; and (d) access is through either a metered connection, shared yard tap, or
water kiosk at a maximum of 500 m from the furthest household. Rehabilitated water points are not eligible
unless it is verified that they include new water points or household connections beyond those currently
served.|\n|Data source/ Agency|County Government, MoWSI (SDWS)|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|Verification of results will be through desk-based review of documents submitted by each county and physical
verification visits. The IVA will undertake physical verification visits to verify households served in selected
water schemes on an agreed sampling basis to be defined in the POM.|\n|**3: Number of sustainably functioning water schemes**|**3: Number of sustainably functioning water schemes**|\n|Formula|US$5,000 per scheme per year verified as sustainably functioning for up to a maximum of 4 years|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made against the number of water schemes that are verified as sustainable, meaning
(a) at least 90 percent of household services (metered or kiosk) are functioning as per definition of
functionality defined in the POM; (b) water scheme has a WASREB/county-approved tariff system; (c) a
graduated O&M cost recovery is achieved as defined in the POM; (d) the scheme is operated by an approved
service provider as per WASREB regulations for rural areas. The provider must have a delegated service
provision compact with the County Water Department and has submitted annual O&M report as per
template defined in the POM and the leadership positions within the service provider should not be more
than two-thirds of the same gender. A sustainably functioning water scheme is eligible for disbursement in
all Program periods; however, a water point must not be submitted under DLI 2 in the same Program period.|\n|Data source/ Agency|County Government, MoWSI (SDWS)|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n\n\n\nPage 49 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n|Procedure|Verification of results will be through desk-based review of documents submitted by each county and physical
visits. The IVA will undertake physcial verification visits to selected water schemes on an agreed sampling
basis. The functionality verification will be at scheme level.|\n|---|---|\n|**4: Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility**|**4: Households provided with access to an improved sanitation facility**|\n|Formula|US$30 per household|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made proportional to the number of households provided with access to an improved
sanitation facility, meaning a facility at household level that hygienically separates human waste from human
contact. Improved sanitation facilities will be defined in the POM.|\n|Data source/ Agency|County Government, MoH|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|Verification will be done at village level. Sampling through physical inspection of no less than 50 percent of
households per sampled villages|\n|**5: Number of villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status**|**5: Number of villages that achieve and sustain community-wide sanitation status**|\n|Formula|US$2,000 per village verified as ODF: US$24,600 per village verified as achieving CWS status and US$12,000
per village verified as sustaining CWS status|\n|Description|DLR 5.1: Villages ODF status as per MoH ODF verification protocol. DLR 5.2: Villages achieving CWS status –
this is to incentivize upgrade from basic ODF status to full improved CWS status. Disbursements will be made
in proportion to the number of villages certified as achieving CWS status, meaning that the following
requirements must be fully met: (a) village has been verified as achieving ODF status, (b) at least 70 percent
of households in the village have access to an improved sanitation facility, (c) all public ECD and primary
schools within the village have access to improved WASH facilities meeting minimum standards, and (d) all
public HCFs within the village have access to improved WASH facilities that meet minimum standards.
DLR 5.3: Villages sustaining CWS status - Disbursements will be made in proportion to the number of
villages certified as sustaining CWS status (that is, sustaining all the conditions under 5.1).|\n|Data source/ Agency|County Government, MoH, MoE|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA shall carry out (a) a desk review of reports and data maintained by the county and MoH and (b)
physical verification of a random sample of no less than 50 percent of villages to confirm ODF and CWS
status. Physical inspection of all facilities in 100 percent of public schools and 100 percent of public health
centers in sampled villages.|\n|**6: Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP**|**6: Number of WSPs compliant with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance and have an approved PIAP**|\n|Formula|US$409,090 per WSP verified as achieving full compliance conditions|\n|Description|Disbursement will be triggered when the WSP meets the following compliance conditions: (a) operating with
a valid WASREB license; (b) having a WASREB-approved justified tariff; (c) having a fully constituted Board of
Directors as per WASREB corporate governance guidelines, with membership of the Board of Directors not
being more than two-thirds of the same gender; (d) having a performance contract between the WSP and
the county government with clear KPIs and conditions for ring-fencing the autonomy of WSP operations as
defined in the POM; and (e) having a PIAP approved by the WSP Board of Directors to improve the WSP’s
financial performance. The PIAP will detail a series of KPIs to measure improvement in operational and
financial performance (NRW, energy efficiency, billing ratio, collection ratio, staff per connection, and so on)
and set up a clear roadmap of improvement on each of them. The PIAPs will be prepared according to a
template defined in the POM and will be audited technically to ensure the targets of the KPIs are set
realistically and according to the resources available for the investments in efficiency.|\n|Data source/Agency|County Government, MoWSI, WASREB|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA shall carry out a desk review of WSP documents and records and cross-check these with WASREB
records and data for confirmation.|\n|**7: Number of WSPs progressively achieving their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio (OCCR) as defined in their PIAPs**|**7: Number of WSPs progressively achieving their Operating Cost Coverage Ratio (OCCR) as defined in their PIAPs**|\n|Formula|US$675,757 disbursement ceiling per WSP over the Program period scalable to level of achievement|\n\n\n\nPage 50 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5916832089424133,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8160331845283508,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.868602454662323,
+ "start": 86,
+ "end": 87
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.6447829604148865,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Households",
+ "confidence": 0.8974278569221497,
+ "start": 86,
+ "end": 87
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ODF verification protocol",
+ "confidence": 0.5127951502799988,
+ "start": 316,
+ "end": 319
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "MoH",
+ "confidence": 0.8022914528846741,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Villages",
+ "confidence": 0.5354316234588623,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 311
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8353146314620972,
+ "start": 404,
+ "end": 405
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "reports and data",
+ "confidence": 0.846051037311554,
+ "start": 546,
+ "end": 549
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.8592098951339722,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 530
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "KPIs",
+ "confidence": 0.874333918094635,
+ "start": 777,
+ "end": 778
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAP",
+ "confidence": 0.560172975063324,
+ "start": 802,
+ "end": 803
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "KPIs",
+ "confidence": 0.5233019590377808,
+ "start": 904,
+ "end": 905
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.7335776090621948,
+ "start": 941,
+ "end": 942
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9356411099433899,
+ "start": 981,
+ "end": 982
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8789910674095154,
+ "start": 996,
+ "end": 997
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.5107617378234863,
+ "start": 947,
+ "end": 948
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.9726542830467224,
+ "start": 981,
+ "end": 982
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n|Description|The OCCR is selected as a representative KPI out of the WSPs PIAPs as a good proxy to measure degree of
implementation of the PIAP. The total amount allocated to this DLI will be equally divided into the 33 WSPs.
Then the annual disbursement each year will be made against the degree of achievement for each WSP as
per their annual OCCR target defined in their PIAP. To be eligible for disbursement under DLI 5, the WSPs
must show sustained full compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements for good governance
defined in DLI 6.|\n|---|---|\n|Data source/Agency|County Government, MoWSI (SDWS), WASREB|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA shall carry out a review of WSP data related to OCCR. The IVA shall make physical visits to the WSPs
to vefify completed investments defined in the PIAPs.|\n|**8: Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing**|**8: Amount of financing leveraged by WSPs from private/commercial financing**|\n|Formula|**100% of the amount leveraged by the WSP from private/commercial financing**|\n|Description|Disbursement will be triggered by the WSP securing a commercial loan deal to finance bankable projects
included in the PIAP, contributing to improvements in the OCCR. This DLI will provide 50 percent of total
bankable project cost or 100 percent of the commercial loan secured. For example, for a bankable project
cost of US$100,000, commercial loan should be US$50,000 and the DLI contributing will be US$50,000.|\n|Data source/Agency|County Government, MoWSI (SDWS), Water Fund|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA shall carry out a desk review of WSP financial records verifying the amount of commercial financing
leveraged.|\n|**9: Water sector intergovernmental Planning, Coordination and Monitoring reforms implemented (Text)**|**9: Water sector intergovernmental Planning, Coordination and Monitoring reforms implemented (Text)**|\n|**9.1: Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No)**|**9.1: Approval and implementation of a Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism (Yes/No)**|\n|Formula|**US$2,000,000 upon Cabinet approval and official launch of the mechanism**|\n|Description|Disbursements against this sub-DLI will be triggered upon approval by the Cabinet of a National Water Sector
Performance-Based Financing Mechanism to facilitate intergovernment fiscal transfers for water services.
The mechanism will detail eligibility criteria and performance-based methodology for fiscal transfers from
national government to county governments.|\n|Data source/Agency|MoWSI|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA will verify the formal adoption and launch through review of the approval process, including the
Cabinet dispatch released following the meeting that formally adopted the mechanism and the official letter
to the World Bank from the MoWSI (SDWS) confirming launch of the mechanism.|\n|**9.2: Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework (Text)**|**9.2: Operationalization of the Water Sector Inter-Governmental Coordination Framework (Text)**|\n|Formula|**US$500,000 annually upon launch of the water sector M&E report and joint sector coordination report**|\n|Description|Disbursement will be triggered when the joint coordination framework secretariat publishes an annually
national water sector M&E report of the progress toward implementation of NAWASIP in a template
defined in the POM, including the annual sector coordination report.|\n|Data source/Agency|MoWSI (SDWS), Council of Governors|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA will verify the operationalization of the coordination framework by reviewing coordination activities,
meeting minutes of the secretariat, and annual joint M&E sector reports.|\n|**10: Number of refugee and host community households provided with sustainable access to improved WASH services (Text)**|**10: Number of refugee and host community households provided with sustainable access to improved WASH services (Text)**|\n|**10.1: Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with sustainable access to improved**
**water services**|**10.1: Number of households in the refugee camps, and in the host communities provided with sustainable access to improved**
**water services**|\n|Formula|**US$61.11 per household**|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made proportionate to the number of households in the refugee camps and in the
host communities provided with access to improved water services from water supply schemes that meet
the following conditions: (a) the household served is in a rural area hosting refugees and the household|\n\n\nPage 51 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP data",
+ "confidence": 0.8868289589881897,
+ "start": 179,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.8018470406532288,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 167
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7120327949523926,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7323881387710571,
+ "start": 32,
+ "end": 33
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6166843771934509,
+ "start": 204,
+ "end": 205
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.5010588765144348,
+ "start": 172,
+ "end": 173
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "WSPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6802729368209839,
+ "start": 193,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "WSP financial records",
+ "confidence": 0.9847714304924011,
+ "start": 398,
+ "end": 401
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.9486498236656189,
+ "start": 384,
+ "end": 385
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Sector Performance-based Financing Mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.7559309005737305,
+ "start": 466,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Cabinet dispatch",
+ "confidence": 0.5901976227760315,
+ "start": 626,
+ "end": 628
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water sector M&E report",
+ "confidence": 0.9708142876625061,
+ "start": 717,
+ "end": 723
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6353445053100586,
+ "start": 722,
+ "end": 723
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "joint sector coordination report",
+ "confidence": 0.7116369605064392,
+ "start": 724,
+ "end": 728
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6348833441734314,
+ "start": 727,
+ "end": 728
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national water sector M&E report",
+ "confidence": 0.9608734846115112,
+ "start": 750,
+ "end": 757
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.7016741633415222,
+ "start": 756,
+ "end": 757
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee and host community households",
+ "confidence": 0.8768278956413269,
+ "start": 848,
+ "end": 853
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "meeting minutes of the secretariat",
+ "confidence": 0.5370656847953796,
+ "start": 825,
+ "end": 830
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5058943629264832,
+ "start": 780,
+ "end": 781
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee and host community households",
+ "confidence": 0.8389201164245605,
+ "start": 848,
+ "end": 853
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual joint M&E sector reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7364494204521179,
+ "start": 832,
+ "end": 839
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee and host community households",
+ "confidence": 0.8632810115814209,
+ "start": 848,
+ "end": 853
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water services",
+ "confidence": 0.6185862421989441,
+ "start": 925,
+ "end": 927
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee camps",
+ "confidence": 0.5835476517677307,
+ "start": 904,
+ "end": 906
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.7192356586456299,
+ "start": 901,
+ "end": 902
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|served is certified as a refugee household; (b) the water supply scheme has technical designs meeting the
minimum design checklist as defined in the POM, before procurement and construction; (c) the water scheme
complies with water quality standards issued by WASREB and DRS; and (d) access is through either a metered
connection, shared yard tap, or water kiosk at a maximum of 500 m from the furthest household.
Rehabilitated water points are not eligible unless it is verified that they include new water points or
household connections beyond those currently served.|\n|---|---|\n|Data source/ Agency|MoWSI (SDWS), Turkana and Garissa Counties, DRS|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|Verification of results will be through desk-based review of documents submitted by each county and physical
verification visits. The IVA will undertake physical verification visits to verify households served in selected
water schemes on an agreed sampling basis to be defined in the POM. The verification of results for refugee
camps will require clearance from DRS.|\n|**10.2: Number of households in the refugee camps and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation**
**facility**|**10.2: Number of households in the refugee camps and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation**
**facility**|\n|Formula|**US$50 per household**|\n|Description|Disbursements to refugee hosting counties will be triggered scalable to the number of households in the
refugee camps and in the host communities provided with access to an improved sanitation facility, meaning
a facility at the household level that hygienically separates human waste from human contact. Improved
sanitation facilites will be defined in the POM.|\n|Data source/Agency|MoWSI (SDWS), MoH, Turkana & Garissa Counties, DRS|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|Verification of results will be through desk-based review of documents submitted by each county and physical
verification visits. The IVA will undertake physical verification visits to verify households served in selected
water schemes on an agreed sampling basis to be defined in the POM. The verification of results for refugee
camps will require clearance by DRS.|\n|**11: Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting counties (Number)**|**11: Number of sustainably functioning water schemes in refugee-hosting counties (Number)**|\n|Formula|**US$80,000 per scheme**|\n|Description|Disbursements will be made to the refugee-hosting counties against the number of water schemes that are
verified as sustainable, meaning (a) at least 90% of household services (metered or kiosk) are functioning as
per definition of functionality defined in the POM; (b) water scheme has a WASREB-/county-approved tariff
system; (c) a graduated O&M cost recovery is achieved as defined in the POM; (d) scheme is operated by an
approved service provider as per WASREB regulations for ruraI areas; (e) schemes inside refugee camps are
operated by an agreed service provision model between DRS (and under it UNHCR) and the respective county
as defined in the transition roadmap to an Intergratedwater utility model; and (f) the leadership positions
within the service provider should not be more than two-thirds of the same gender. A sustainably functioning
water scheme is eligible for disbursement in all Program periods; however, a water scheme must not be
submitted under DLI 10.1 in the same Program period.|\n|Data source/Agency|MoWSI (SDWS), Turkana and Garissa Counties, DRS|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|Verification of results will be through desk-based review of documents submitted by each county and physical
visits. The IVA will undertake physcial verification visits to selected water schemes on an agreed sampling
basis. The functionality verification will be at scheme level. The verification of results for refugee camps will
require clearance from DRS.|\n|**12: Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number)**|**12: Number of villages in the refugee camps, and in the Host communities certified as achieving CWS status (Number)**|\n|Formula|**US$20,000 per village certified as achieving CWS status**|\n|Description|DLR 5.1: Villages achieving open defecation free status as per MoH verification protocol. DLR 5.2: Villages
achieving CWS status—this is to incentivize upgrade from basic ODF status to full improved CWS status.
Disbursements will be made in proportion to the number of villages certified as achieving CWS status,
meaning that the following requirements must be fully met: (a) village has been verified as achieving ODF|\n\n\nPage 52 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water supply scheme",
+ "confidence": 0.8159061074256897,
+ "start": 33,
+ "end": 36
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7038173079490662,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee household",
+ "confidence": 0.5184538960456848,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 28
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.872806966304779,
+ "start": 228,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IVA",
+ "confidence": 0.5805973410606384,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9503850936889648,
+ "start": 209,
+ "end": 210
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.7121175527572632,
+ "start": 401,
+ "end": 402
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9472863674163818,
+ "start": 349,
+ "end": 350
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.7047737836837769,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting counties",
+ "confidence": 0.9453545212745667,
+ "start": 514,
+ "end": 516
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.723031222820282,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "POM",
+ "confidence": 0.6176831722259521,
+ "start": 611,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "graduated O&M cost recovery",
+ "confidence": 0.5715000629425049,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 640
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "ruraI areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5317440629005432,
+ "start": 667,
+ "end": 669
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\nstatus, (b) at least 70 percent of households in the village have access to an improved sanitation facility, (c)\nall public early childhood and primary schools within the village have access to improved WASH facilities\nmeeting minimum standards, and (d) all public HCFs within the village have access to improved WASH\nfacilities that meet minimum standards.\nDLR 5.3: Villages sustaining CWS status - Disbursements will be made in proportion to the number of\nvillages certified as sustaining CWS status (that is, sustaining all the conditions under DLI 5.1).\n\n\n\n\n\n|Data source/Agency|MoWSI (SDWS), DRS|\n|---|---|\n|Verification Entity|IVA|\n|Procedure|The IVA shall carry out (a) a desk review of reports and data maintained by the county and (b) physical
verification of a random sample of no less than 50 percent of villages to confirm ODF and CWS status. Physical
inspection of all facilities in 100 percent of public schools and 100 percent of public health centers in sampled
villages. The verification of results for refugee camps will require clearance by DRS in consulatation with
UNHCR.|\n\n\nPage 53 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n**ANNEX 3. PROGRAM ACTION PLAN**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Action Description|Source|DLI
#|Responsibili
ty|Timing|Col6|Completion
Measurement|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|#1. Establish a County
Program Implementation Unit
(PIU) with clear roles and
responsibilities, coordination,
and communication channels
as defined in the POM|Technical|NA|Participating
Counties|Due
Date|28-Jun-
2024|Each
Participating
County has a
properly
constituted PIU
as defined in the
POM.
Nomination
letter signed by
County
Governor
submitted to
MoWSI.|\n|#2. Develop a transition
roadmap to an Integrated
Refugee and Host
Communities Water Utility
Services Model|Technical|NA|Turkana and
Garissa
Counties|Due
Date|30-Jun-
2025|Signed letters
from Turkana
and Garissa
counties, MoWSI
and DRS
approving the
transition
roadmap to an
Integrated
Refugee and
Host
Communities
Water Utility
Services Model.|\n|#3. Deploy at least one
qualified and experienced
Environmental, and one Social
Safeguards Expert on a
fulltime basis|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|MoWSI PCU,
Participating
Counties|Due
Date|30-Aug-
2024|The MoWSI PMU
and each
Participating
County PIU has
at least one
qualified and
experienced
Environmental|\n\n\nPage 54 of 58\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|and one Social
Safeguards
Expert. Signed
letters by
MoWSI and
Participating
Counties and
confirmed
annually through
APA.|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|#4. Create a dedicated and
adequately resourced
Countywide Environmental,
Social Health and Safety
(ESHS) risk Unit|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|Participating
Counties|Due
Date|29-Nov-
2024|Each
Participating
County has
established an
ESHS Unit as per
the
requirements
detailed in the
POM.
Supervision and
monitoring
reports and
confirmed
through APA|\n|#5. Participating Counties and
WSPs PIUs receive training on
use of the Environmental,
Social, Health and Safety Risks
Management (ESHSRM)
Manual|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|MoWSI PMU|Recurre
nt|Yearly|Training on
ESHSRM Manual
and GRM
delivered to PIUs
by MoWSI PMU
in collaboration
with other
relevant Lead
Agencies. Annual
training calendar
delivered on
ESHS capacity
building and
confirmed
through
progress report.|\n\n\nPage 55 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|#6. MoWSI PMU Grievance
Redress Mechanism
established and functional|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|MoWSI PMU|Recurre
nt|Continuo
us|GRM constituted
and grievances
being logged,
responded, and
resolved|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|#7. Include a robust E&S risks
management verification
protocol in the APA|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|MoWSI PMU|Recurre
nt|Yearly|E&S verification
indicators are
included in the
ToR for the APA.
A chapter on
E&S
performance is
included in the
main APA
reports|\n|#8. Include ESHS clauses in the
bidding and contract
documents for civil works,
including signing code of
conduct by contractor
employees.|Environment
al and Social
Systems|NA|MOWSI
PNU/County
& WSP PIUs|Recurre
nt|Continuo
us|Bidding
and
Contract
document
templates
with
ESHS
aspects.
Percentage
expenditure on
ESHS aspects in
line
with
the
allocated
budget.
Supervision and
monitoring
reports
and
confirmed
through APA.|\n|#9. Establish a basic financial
and accounting system to aid
in budgeting, accounting, and
financial reporting and in
developing FM and
procurement manuals|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|WSPs|Recurre
nt|Yearly|Financial and
accounting
system
established and
confirmed throu
gh progress
reports and APA.|\n\n\nPage 56 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|#10. Provide budget line to
support internal audit
department at the counties
and there after conducting
annual review of the Program
for the Participating Counties
and WSPs.|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|Participating
Counties|Recurre
nt|Yearly|Year 1: signed
letters from the
counties
confirming that
budget line has
been created
and budget
allocated.
Annually
thereafter:
signed letters
from the
counties
confirming that
budget has been
allocated|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|#11. Implementation of public
disclosure of procurement
plans and outcomes as
prescribed in the existing laws.|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|MoWSI,
Participating
Counties
and WSPs|Recurre
nt|Continuo
us|Procurement
Plans and
Outcomes
published by
MoWSI PMU
and
Counties/WSPs
PIUs on their
websites and in
the Public
Procurement
Information
Portal (PPIP) as
prescribed by
the existing
laws.|\n|#12. Develop and implement
an internal procurement
related complaint handling
mechanism|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|MOWSI
PMU,
Counties &
WSP PIUs|Due
Date|29-Nov-
2024|Internal
procurement
complaint
handling
mechanism
established, and
internal
procurement
complaint report|\n\n\nPage 57 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nKenya Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Program (P179012)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|submitted and
confirmed
through the
APA|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|#13. Develop and implement
procurement and contract
management monitoring and
tracking arrangements in
every implementing agency.|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|MoWSI,
Participating
Counties
and WSPs|Recurre
nt|Continuo
us|System
established
within six
months of
effectiveness or
by Nov. 29,
2024. System
maintained and
confirmed
through
progress reports
and
Implementation
Support
Missions Aide
Memoires|\n|#14. Monitoring the CAJ and
EACC annual certification
process as part of the
“resolution of public
complaints” and “corruption
prevention indicators” under
the Performance Contracting
system.|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|MOWSI
PMU|Recurre
nt|Yearly|Annual
certification
process
(certificates
issued by the
EACC and CAJ)
measured up
until
the Program
comes to an
end.|\n|#15. Monitor the list of
debarred firms from the
World Bank website:
http://www.worldbank.org/de
bar during the preliminary
evaluation of the tenders|Fiduciary
Systems|NA|MOWSI
PMU;
County &
WSP PIUs|Recurre
nt|Continuo
us|List of debarred
firms
continuously
monitored at the
time of tender
evaluations.|\n\n\nPage 58 of 58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099120123140034670/pdf/BOSIB-9a6accb6-73d1-4bd1-8307-d41a339a51ab.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file