diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_116/raw/doc_116_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_116/raw/doc_116_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_116/raw/doc_116_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,3384 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "Document of\n# The World Bank\n\n\n**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY**\n\n\nReport No.: PAD1510\n\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\n\nON THE\n\n\nPROPOSED CREDIT\n\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR14.2 MILLION\n\n\n(US$20 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nTO THE\n\n\nREPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA\n\n\nFOR THE\n\n\nGREAT LAKES REGION DISPLACED PERSONS AND BORDER COMMUNITIES\n\nPROJECT\n\n\nSECOND PHASE IN A SERIES OF PROJECTS\n\n\nMay 3, 2016\n\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice\nAfrica Region\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the\nperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World\nBank authorization.\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n(Exchange Rate Effective March 31, 2016)\n\n\n\nZMW 11.07\nSDR 0.70981389\n\n\n\n= US$ 1\n= US$ 1\n\nUS$ 1.41 = SDR 1\n\n\n\n=\n=\n\n\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJanuary 1 - December 31\n\nABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS\n\n\n\nAU\nASA\nAWPB\n\n\n\nAU African Union\nASA Advisory Services and Analytics\nAWPB Annual Work Plans and Budget\n\nCDD Community-Driven Development\nCPS Country Partnership Strategy\nCQS\nDA Designated Account\nDO Development Objective\nDRC Democratic Republic of Congo\n\n\n\nCDD Community-Driven Development\nCPS Country Partnership Strategy\nCQS Selection based on Consultant’s Qualifications\nDA Designated Account\nDO Development Objective\nDRC Democratic Republic of Congo\n\nDPSC District Planning and Advisory Sub-Committee\nESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework\nESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan\nFM Financial Management\nGBV Gender Based Violence\nGHG Green House Gas\nGLR Great Lakes Region\n\n\n\nDPSC District Planning and Advisory Sub-Committee\nESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework\nESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan\nFM Financial Management\nGBV Gender Based Violence\nGHG Green House Gas\nGLR Great Lakes Region\n\nGLRI Great Lakes Regional Initiative\nIC Individual Consultant\nICB International Competitive Bidding\n\n\n\nGLRI Great Lakes Regional Initiative\nIC Individual Consultant\nICB International Competitive Bidding\n\nICGLR\nIBRD\n\n\n\nICGLR International Conference on the Great Lakes Region\nIBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development\n\nIDA International Development Association\nIDP Internally Displaced Person\n\n\n\nIDA International Development Association\nIDP Internally Displaced Person\n\nIFR Unaudited Interim Financial Report\nIPR Independent Post Review\nISP Implementation Support Plan\nIPSAS\nLCS Least Cost Selection\nM and E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMoHA Ministry of Home Affairs\n\n\n\nIFR Unaudited Interim Financial Report\nIPR Independent Post Review\nISP Implementation Support Plan\nIPSAS International Public Sector Accounting Standards\nLCS Least Cost Selection\nM and E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMoHA Ministry of Home Affairs\n\nMoF Ministry of Finance\nNCB National Competitive Bidding\nNCCS National Climate Change Secretariat\nOAG Office of the Auditor General\n\n\n\nMinistry of Finance\nNational Competitive Bidding\nNational Climate Change Secretariat\nOffice of the Auditor General\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "OP/BP\nPAD\nPCU\nPDO\nPIM\nPIU\nPPR\n\n\n\nOP/BP Operational Policy and Bank Policy\nPAD Project Appraisal Document\nPCU Project Coordination Unit\nPDO Project Development Objective\nPIM Project Implementation Manual\nPIU Project implementation Unit\nPPR Post Procurement Review\n\nPPIU Provincial Project Implementation Unit\nP-RAMS Procurement Risk Assessment\nPSCF Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework\nQCBS Quality and Cost Based Selection\n\n\n\nPPIU Provincial Project Implementation Unit\nP-RAMS Procurement Risk Assessment\nPSCF Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework\nQCBS Quality and Cost Based Selection\n\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\nRAP Resettlement Action Plan\nSFLI Strategic Framework for Local Integration\nSOE Statement of Expenditures\n\n\n\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\nRAP Resettlement Action Plan\nSFLI Strategic Framework for Local Integration\nSOE Statement of Expenditures\n\nSOP Series of Projects\nSPLI Strategic Plan for Local Integration\nSSS Single Source Selection\n\n\n\nSOP Series of Projects\nSPLI Strategic Plan for Local Integration\nSSS Single Source Selection\n\nTOR Terms of Reference\nTTL Task Team Leader\nUN United Nations\nUNHCR\nZPPA Zambia Public Procurement Authority\n\n\n\nTerms of Reference\nTask Team Leader\nUnited Nations\nUnited Nations High Commission for Refugees\nZambia Public Procurement Authority\n\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Makhtar Diop\nCountry Director: Ahmadou Moustapha Ndiaye\nSenior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez\nPractice Manager: Robin Mearns\nTask Team Leader: Natacha Lemasle\nTask Team Leader: Joanna P. de Berry (SOP)\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Appraisal Document",
+ "confidence": 0.6690550446510315,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.5057008266448975,
+ "start": 162,
+ "end": 163
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "P-RAMS Procurement Risk Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5127666592597961,
+ "start": 46,
+ "end": 50
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.569391131401062,
+ "start": 162,
+ "end": 163
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RPF Resettlement Policy Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.5239088535308838,
+ "start": 103,
+ "end": 107
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.5802450180053711,
+ "start": 162,
+ "end": 163
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**ZAMBIA**\n\n\n**Great Lakes Region: Displaced Persons and Border Communities Project (P152821)**\n\n\n**Table of Contents**\n\n\n**Page**\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................1**\n\nA. Regional Context .......................................................................................................... 1\n\nB. Country Contexts .......................................................................................................... 8\n\nC. Higher Level Objectives to which the Program Contributes ...................................... 11\n\n\n**II.** **PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................12**\n\nA. PDO............................................................................................................................. 12\n\nB. Program Beneficiaries ................................................................................................. 12\n\nC. Program Level Results Indicators ............................................................................... 12\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................12**\n\nA. Program Components.................................................................................................. 13\n\nB. Program Financing ...................................................................................................... 16\n\nC. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Program Design ............................................. 17\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................19**\n\nA. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........................................................ 19\n\nB. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 20\n\nC. Sustainability............................................................................................................... 21\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS ......................................................................................................................22**\n\nA. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks.................................................... 22\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY ..............................................................................................23**\n\nA. Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................... 23\n\nB. Technical ..................................................................................................................... 24\n\nC. Financial Management ................................................................................................ 25\n\nD. Procurement ................................................................................................................ 25\n\nE. Social Inclusion and Social Safeguards ...................................................................... 27\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "F. Environment (including Safeguards) .......................................................................... 28\n\nG. Other Safeguards Policies Triggered .......................................................................... 30\n\nH. Summary of Safeguard Policies .................................................................................. 30\n\nI. World Bank Grievance Redress .................................................................................. 31\n\nAnnex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring.............................................................................. 33\nAnnex 2: Detailed Context……………………………………………………………………….41\nAnnex 3: Economic and Financial Analysis……………………………………………………..64\nAnnex 4: Implementation Support Plan……………………………………………………….....67\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**PAD DATA SHEET**\n\n_Zambia_\n\n_GLR: Displaced Persons & Border Communities (P152821)_\n\n**PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT**\n\n\n_AFRICA_\n\n_GSURR_\n\n\nReport No.: PAD1510\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Basic Information|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Project ID|Project ID|Project ID|EA Category|EA Category|Team Leader(s)|Team Leader(s)|\n|P152821|P152821|P152821|B - Partial Assessment|B - Partial Assessment|Joanna Peace De Berry, Natacha
Caroline Lemasle|Joanna Peace De Berry, Natacha
Caroline Lemasle|\n|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|\n|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|\n||||Series of Projects [ X ]|Series of Projects [ X ]|Series of Projects [ X ]|Series of Projects [ X ]|\n|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|\n|May 27, 2016|May 27, 2016|May 27, 2016|June 30, 2021|June 30, 2021|June 30, 2021|June 30, 2021|\n|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|\n|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|January 2, 2017
December 31, 2021|\n|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|\n|No
|No
|No
|No
|No
|No
|No
|\n|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|Practice
Manager/Manager
Senior Global Practice
Director
Country Director
Regional Vice President|\n|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop|\n|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|Borrower: Republic of Zambia (MINISTRY OF FINANCE)|\n|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|Responsible Agency: Zambia National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)|\n|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|Contact:
David Kaluba
Title:
National Coordinator|\n|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|Telephone No.: 260-211-236480
Email: davidkaluba@znccs.org.zm|\n|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|**Project Financing Data(in US$, millions)**|\n|[ ]
Loan|[ ]
IDA Grant|[ ]
IDA Grant|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|\n|[ X ]
Credit|[ ]
Grant|[ ]
Grant|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|\n|Total Project Cost:|Total Project Cost:|20.00|20.00|Total Bank Financing:|Total Bank Financing:|20.00|\n\n\ni\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PAD DATA SHEET",
+ "confidence": 0.9963640570640564,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Report",
+ "confidence": 0.5108790993690491,
+ "start": 28,
+ "end": 29
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT",
+ "confidence": 0.7599650025367737,
+ "start": 21,
+ "end": 24
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Report",
+ "confidence": 0.5869038701057434,
+ "start": 28,
+ "end": 29
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Expected Effectiveness Date",
+ "confidence": 0.5705360770225525,
+ "start": 331,
+ "end": 334
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Joint IFC",
+ "confidence": 0.5728856921195984,
+ "start": 487,
+ "end": 489
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Financing Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9967170357704163,
+ "start": 1330,
+ "end": 1333
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "US$",
+ "confidence": 0.7102177739143372,
+ "start": 1335,
+ "end": 1337
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Financing Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9999079704284668,
+ "start": 1360,
+ "end": 1363
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "US$",
+ "confidence": 0.7977003455162048,
+ "start": 1350,
+ "end": 1352
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Total Project Cost",
+ "confidence": 0.8431625366210938,
+ "start": 1537,
+ "end": 1540
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Total Bank Financing",
+ "confidence": 0.5255974531173706,
+ "start": 1555,
+ "end": 1558
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Financing Gap:|Col2|Col3|0.00|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|Col12|Col13|Col14|Col15|Col16|Col17|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|\n|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00|\n|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|\n|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|20.00|\n|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions)**|\n|Fiscal
Year|2016|2017|2017|2018|2019|2019|2020|2020|2021|2021|||||||\n|Annual|0.3|5|5|5|4|4|4|4|1.7|1.7|||||||\n|Cumulati
ve|0.3|5.3|5.3|10.3|14.3|14.3|18.3|18.3|20|20|||||||\n|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|\n|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|\n|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|\n|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|\n|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|Social Protection & Labor|\n|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|\n|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|\n|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|\n|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|\n|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|[ ]
Jobs|\n|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|\n|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|\n|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|\n|Major Sector|Major Sector|Major Sector|Major Sector|Major Sector|Sector|Sector|Sector|Sector|Sector|%|%|Adaptation
Co-benefits
%|Adaptation
Co-benefits
%|Adaptation
Co-benefits
%|Mitigation Co-
benefits %|Mitigation Co-
benefits %|\n|Agriculture, fishing, and forestry|Agriculture, fishing, and forestry|Agriculture, fishing, and forestry|Agriculture, fishing, and forestry|Agriculture, fishing, and forestry|General agriculture,
fishing and forestry
sector|General agriculture,
fishing and forestry
sector|General agriculture,
fishing and forestry
sector|General agriculture,
fishing and forestry
sector|General agriculture,
fishing and forestry
sector|25|25|20|20|20|20|20|\n|Health and other social services|Health and other social services|Health and other social services|Health and other social services|Health and other social services|Other social services|Other social services|Other social services|Other social services|Other social services|50|50|20|20|20|20|20|\n|Education|Education|Education|Education|Education|General education sector|General education sector|General education sector|General education sector|General education sector|15|15|5|5|5|5|5|\n|Public Administration, Law, and
Justice|Public Administration, Law, and
Justice|Public Administration, Law, and
Justice|Public Administration, Law, and
Justice|Public Administration, Law, and
Justice|Sub-national government
administration|Sub-national government
administration|Sub-national government
administration|Sub-national government
administration|Sub-national government
administration|10|10||||||\n|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|100|100|100|100|100|100|100|\n|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to|\n\n\nii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financing Gap",
+ "confidence": 0.8877887725830078,
+ "start": 1,
+ "end": 3
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Amount",
+ "confidence": 0.6852928400039673,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "International Development Association (IDA)",
+ "confidence": 0.5756903886795044,
+ "start": 441,
+ "end": 447
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+ "confidence": 0.751250147819519,
+ "start": 580,
+ "end": 582
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "US$",
+ "confidence": 0.6595210433006287,
+ "start": 584,
+ "end": 586
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+ "confidence": 0.8781836032867432,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 610
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "US$",
+ "confidence": 0.6752877831459045,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 614
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Institutional Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9872008562088013,
+ "start": 936,
+ "end": 938
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Institutional Data",
+ "confidence": 0.6131359934806824,
+ "start": 936,
+ "end": 938
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Contributing Practice Areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5196807384490967,
+ "start": 1406,
+ "end": 1409
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Climate Change",
+ "confidence": 0.6503196358680725,
+ "start": 1762,
+ "end": 1764
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Climate Change",
+ "confidence": 0.7388225197792053,
+ "start": 1807,
+ "end": 1809
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Public Private Partnership",
+ "confidence": 0.5613874793052673,
+ "start": 2377,
+ "end": 2380
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information",
+ "confidence": 0.960322916507721,
+ "start": 3334,
+ "end": 3341
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information",
+ "confidence": 0.9569281339645386,
+ "start": 3462,
+ "end": 3469
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|this project.|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|\n|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|\n|Major theme|Theme|Theme|Theme|%|\n|Social dev/gender/inclusion|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|20|\n|Social dev/gender/inclusion|Other social development|Other social development|Other social development|20|\n|Social protection and risk management|Improving labor markets|Improving labor markets|Improving labor markets|20|\n|Social dev/gender/inclusion|Social Inclusion|Social Inclusion|Social Inclusion|20|\n|Rural development|Rural services and infrastructure|Rural services and infrastructure|Rural services and infrastructure|20|\n|Total|Total|Total|Total|100|\n|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|\n|To improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host
communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.|To improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host
communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.|To improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host
communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.|To improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host
communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.|To improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host
communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.|\n|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|\n|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Cost (US$)**|**Cost (US$)**|**Cost (US$)**|\n|Socio-economic Infrastructure|Socio-economic Infrastructure|15,000,000|15,000,000|15,000,000|\n|Support to resilient livelihoods|Support to resilient livelihoods|825,000|825,000|825,000|\n|Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention|Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention|1,000,000|1,000,000|1,000,000|\n|Project Management|Project Management|3,175,000|3,175,000|3,175,000|\n|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|\n|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Rating**|**Rating**|\n|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|Substantial|Substantial|\n|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|Substantial|Substantial|\n|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|Moderate|Moderate|\n|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|Moderate|Moderate|\n|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|Moderate|Moderate|\n|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|Moderate|Moderate|\n|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|Moderate|Moderate|\n|8. Stakeholders|8. Stakeholders|8. Stakeholders|Moderate|Moderate|\n|9. Other (elite capture)|9. Other (elite capture)|9. Other (elite capture)|Substantial|Substantial|\n|**OVERALL**
|**OVERALL**
|**OVERALL**
|Substantial|Substantial|\n\n\n\niii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Conflict prevention and post-conflict",
+ "confidence": 0.5238978862762451,
+ "start": 155,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.9737865328788757,
+ "start": 654,
+ "end": 660
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Compliance|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|\n|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects?|Yes [ ] No [ X ]|Yes [ ] No [ X ]|Yes [ ] No [ X ]|Yes [ ] No [ X ]|\n|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|\n|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Yes [ ]
No [ X]|Yes [ ]
No [ X]|Yes [ ]
No [ X]|Yes [ ]
No [ X]|\n|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|\n|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Yes [ X]
No [ ]|Yes [ X]
No [ ]|Yes [ X]
No [ ]|Yes [ X]
No [ ]|\n|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|\n|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|**X**|**X**|**X**|**X**||\n|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|**X**|**X**|**X**|**X**||\n|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|**X**|**X**|**X**|**X**||\n|Pest Management OP 4.09|Pest Management OP 4.09|Pest Management OP 4.09|Pest Management OP 4.09|**X**|**X**|**X**|**X**||\n|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|||||**X**|\n|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|||||**X**|\n|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|**X**|**X**|**X**|**X**||\n|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|||||**X**|\n|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|||||**X**|\n|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|||||**X**|\n|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|\n|**Name**|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n||||||||||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|\n|**Source of Fund**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA|Project Implementation Manual|Project Implementation Manual|Project Implementation Manual|Project Implementation Manual|Project Implementation Manual|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|\n|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|**Description of Condition**
The Condition of Effectiveness consists of the following, namely, that the Recipient has adopted a
Project Implementation Manual acceptable to the Association.|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA|Annual Work Program for first year and first
Sub-Project Agreement signed|Annual Work Program for first year and first
Sub-Project Agreement signed|Annual Work Program for first year and first
Sub-Project Agreement signed|Annual Work Program for first year and first
Sub-Project Agreement signed|Annual Work Program for first year and first
Sub-Project Agreement signed|Disbursement|Disbursement|Disbursement|\n|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (1), until and unless (i) the Annual Work Program for the first|\n\n\niv\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01",
+ "confidence": 0.8797776699066162,
+ "start": 1021,
+ "end": 1029
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01",
+ "confidence": 0.6018613576889038,
+ "start": 1030,
+ "end": 1038
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04",
+ "confidence": 0.6259017586708069,
+ "start": 1083,
+ "end": 1091
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Pest Management OP 4.09",
+ "confidence": 0.721156656742096,
+ "start": 1203,
+ "end": 1209
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Projects on International Waterways",
+ "confidence": 0.8896958231925964,
+ "start": 1501,
+ "end": 1505
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Legal Covenants",
+ "confidence": 0.6215176582336426,
+ "start": 1580,
+ "end": 1582
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Implementation Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.7358262538909912,
+ "start": 1898,
+ "end": 1901
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Implementation Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.9339146018028259,
+ "start": 2111,
+ "end": 2114
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Implementation Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.8063669800758362,
+ "start": 2267,
+ "end": 2270
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Sub-Project Agreement",
+ "confidence": 0.8826191425323486,
+ "start": 2407,
+ "end": 2409
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association, and (ii) the Recipient has signed the first Sub-Project Agreement in form and substance
satisfactory to the Association.|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA|Annual Work Program|Annual Work Program|Annual Work Program|Disbursement|Disbursement|\n|**Description of condition**|**Description of condition**|**Description of condition**|**Description of condition**|**Description of condition**|**Description of condition**|\n|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|No withdrawal shall be made under Category (2), until and unless the Annual Work Program for the first
year of the Project has been prepared and adopted by the Recipient in form and substance satisfactory to the
Association|\n|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|\n|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|\n|**Name**|**Role**|**Title**|**Specialization**|**Specialization**|**Unit**|\n|Joanna Peace De Berry|Team Leader|Senior Social
Development
Specialist|Forced
Displacement|Forced
Displacement|GSU07|\n|Natacha Caroline
Lemasle|Team Leader
(ADM
Responsible)|Senior Social
Development
Specialist|Conflict and
Fragility|Conflict and
Fragility|GSU07|\n|Ann-Sofie Jespersen|Team Member|Jr Professional
Officer|Operations|Operations|OPSRR|\n|Cordelia Chesnutt|Team Member|Social
Development
Specialist|Forced
Displacement|Forced
Displacement|GCFDR|\n|Diego Garrido Martin|Team Member|Senior Operations
Officer|Monitoring and
Evaluation|Monitoring and
Evaluation|GCFDR|\n|Iretomiwa Olatunji|Team Member|Environmental
Specialist|Climate Change|Climate Change|GEN07|\n|Mariangeles Sabella|Counsel|Senior Counsel|Legal|Legal|LEGAM|\n|Kaori Oshima|Team Member|Social
Development
Specialist|Community-
Driven
Development|Community-
Driven
Development|GSUGL|\n|Kristine Schwebach|Safeguards
Specialist|Senior Social
Development
Specialist|Safeguards|Safeguards|GSU07|\n|Joseph Ellong|Team Member|Senior Program
Assistant|Operations|Operations|GSU01|\n|Lingson Chikoti|Team Member|Consultant|Financial
Management|Financial
Management|GGO25|\n|Mwansa Lukwesa|Safeguards
Specialist|Environmental
Specialist|Environment|Environment|GEN01|\n\n\nv\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Description of condition",
+ "confidence": 0.5067775845527649,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 149
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual Work Program",
+ "confidence": 0.9864585995674133,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "first
year of the Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5031486749649048,
+ "start": 213,
+ "end": 221
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual Work Program",
+ "confidence": 0.9776185154914856,
+ "start": 304,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "first
year of the Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5686050653457642,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5101237893104553,
+ "start": 450,
+ "end": 451
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Richard Coppinger|Col2|Team Member|Col4|Consultant|Col6|Col7|International
Engineer|Col9|GSU07|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Wedex Ilunga|Wedex Ilunga|Team Member|Team Member|Senior Procurement
Specialist|Senior Procurement
Specialist|Senior Procurement
Specialist|Procurement|Procurement|GGO01|\n|Wolfhart Pohl|Wolfhart Pohl|Safeguards
Specialist|Safeguards
Specialist|Adviser|Adviser|Adviser|Advisor|Advisor|GCFDR|\n|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|\n|**Name**|**Name**|**Title**|**Title**|**Title**|**Office Phone**|**Office Phone**|**Office Phone**|**Location**|**Location**|\n|||||||||||\n|||||||||||\n|||||||||||\n|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|\n|**Country**|**First**
**Administrative**
**Division**|**First**
**Administrative**
**Division**|**Location**|**Location**|**Location**|**Planned**|**Actual**|**Comments**|**Comments**|\n|Zambia|Western|Western|Western Province|Western Province|Western Province|**X**||||\n|Zambia|North-Western|North-Western|North-Western
Province|North-Western
Province|North-Western
Province|**X**||||\n|Zambia|Lusaka|Lusaka|Lusaka Province|Lusaka Province|Lusaka Province|**X**||||\n|||||||||||\n|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|\n|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|\n\n\nvi\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monthly Operational Summary",
+ "confidence": 0.9988378882408142,
+ "start": 566,
+ "end": 569
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monthly Operational Summary",
+ "confidence": 0.9999651908874512,
+ "start": 614,
+ "end": 617
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n\n**A.** **Regional Context**\n\n\n1. There are currently more than 3.4 million refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)\nin the Great Lakes Region (GLR). Those directly affected are a particularly vulnerable group\nwho have suffered trauma and loss of homes, assets, livelihoods and have had to re-build lives in\nnew contexts, often in poor and physically isolated settings. The research undertaken in\npreparation for this project suggests that displaced persons in the GLR tend to have lower\nincomes, lower employment rates and greater dependency on direct transfers than the nondisplaced. [ 1] Their ability to make a living can be further reduced by limited freedom of\nmovement, legal restrictions, linguistic or cultural barriers, harassment and discrimination. While\nmany have shown remarkable fortitude and resilience, all too often forced displacement results in\ngreater impoverishment. In the worst cases, the forcibly displaced are subject to extreme poverty\nand reliance on humanitarian assistance. In a region already facing high poverty rates and large\nnumbers of poor people, [2] those directly affected by forced displacement and the impacts on the\ncommunities that host them constitute a distinct challenge for wider poverty alleviation efforts\nfor the GLR.\n\n\n2. To date, the majority of interventions for the displaced in the GLR have been humanitarian\nin nature, financed and implemented through humanitarian agencies. To tackle the displacement\nchallenge, the ‘Great Lakes Region Displaced Persons and Border Communities Series of\nProjects _’_ seeks to implement and operationalize a development response to forced displacement.\nA development response to forced displacement differs from a humanitarian response to the\ndegree that it supports those affected by displacement to be self-reliant, integrated into wider\nsociety and endowed with productive assets as well as the degree to which it considers and\nmitigates the impacts on hosting communities. Development responses to forced displacement\ninvolve embedding that response within broader institutional systems of Government financing\nand public administration (see Table 1 below).\n\n\n_**Great Lakes Region Displaced Persons and Border Communities Series of Projects**_\n\n\n3. Operational Policy/Bank Procedure 10.00 enables the World Bank to support a Series of\nProjects (SOP) to multiple borrowers who are facing a common set of development issues. In\nthis case, the common development challenge is that of forced displacement. The overall\nobjective of the SOP is: ‘(a) _to improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure_\n_for displaced persons and their host communities; and (b) to support regional learning on_\n_development responses to forced displacement.’_\n\n\n1 World Bank/UNHCR, 2015, _Forced Displacement in the Great Lakes Region, A Development Response_\n2 Poverty rates have been falling, yet they remain high, especially in Burundi (66 percent in 2006), the Democratic\nRepublic of Congo (DRC) (63 percent in 2012) and Zambia (60 percent in 2010). The situation is particularly dire\nfor DRC, whose Human Development Index score is the second lowest in the world and per capita income are also\namong the lowest in the world (US$220 in 2012). Even in Tanzania where poverty rates are at 28 percent,\npopulation growth means that the same number of people remain poor as ten years ago and its average per capita\nincome at US$570 (in 2012), places it only in the 176th global position for income.\n\n\n1\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "research",
+ "confidence": 0.957557201385498,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region",
+ "confidence": 0.7563997507095337,
+ "start": 45,
+ "end": 48
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Displaced Persons",
+ "confidence": 0.6185541749000549,
+ "start": 38,
+ "end": 40
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "development response to forced displacement",
+ "confidence": 0.5896043181419373,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5279316902160645,
+ "start": 491,
+ "end": 493
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region",
+ "confidence": 0.7906907200813293,
+ "start": 381,
+ "end": 384
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5992463827133179,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 497
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Displaced Persons",
+ "confidence": 0.7230351567268372,
+ "start": 384,
+ "end": 386
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Human Development Index",
+ "confidence": 0.7457296252250671,
+ "start": 563,
+ "end": 566
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank/UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.8621059060096741,
+ "start": 491,
+ "end": 495
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region",
+ "confidence": 0.5103020668029785,
+ "start": 502,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9515950083732605,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 497
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.586937427520752,
+ "start": 543,
+ "end": 544
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "displaced persons",
+ "confidence": 0.8123759627342224,
+ "start": 466,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "4. It is beyond the scope of the SOP to respond to all the situations of forced displacement in\nthe GLR, which are varied and often acute. The design of the SOP was informed by\nidentification of clear openings for new ways of working on forced displacement, where there is\nclient commitment to development solutions, and where there is a good chance for success. [3]\nThere is much to build upon in the region in furthering development responses to forced\ndisplacement. And much for the GLR countries to demonstrate to each other and more globally\nthe benefits, impacts, and challenges of long term sustainable development solutions for\nprotracted displacement.\n\n\n5. The phases of the SOP were determined by urgency, client demand, and readiness. The first\nphase of the SOP related to DRC, where investment in support of IDPs, refugees and their host\ncommunities was processed as the US$50 million Additional Financing to the DRC Eastern\nRecovery Project with Board approval on December 11, 2015 (P157303). This first phase was\nprioritized because the displacement crisis in DRC was at a stage where there could be a\ntransition to more development approaches and there was a window of opportunity to start those\napproaches through processing of Additional Financing to a well performing project. The Project\nDevelopment Objective of the first phase of the SOP is ‘ _to improve access to livelihoods and_\n_socio-economic infrastructures in vulnerable communities in the eastern provinces of DRC’_ .\nProject activities are targeted to: (a) assist returnees and host populations to rebuild socioeconomic infrastructure damaged during conflict; (b) assist IDPs who decide to remain in their\narea of displacement and their hosts by expanding socio-economic infrastructure that has become\noverburdened; (c) provide short-term and longer-term livelihoods opportunities to displaced\npopulations and host communities both in areas of displacement and return; and (d) strengthen\ntraining at the community level on conflict prevention and management to improve the\nlikelihood of peaceful reintegration of returning community members and minimize tensions\nbetween IDPs and their host communities.\n\n\n6. The proposed second phase of the SOP (the focus of this Project Appraisal Document)\ninvolves a US$20 million Credit to the Republic of Zambia in support of local integration of\nformer refugees and their host communities. The PDO for this phase is: ‘ _to improve access to_\n_livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host communities in the_\n_targeted areas of the recipient’s territory’._ Zambia is globally unique for having embarked on a\nprocess of offering full local integration for long term refugees. Although local integration is\nadvocated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as one of three\npreferable solutions for the long term displaced (alongside return and resettlement), it is rarely\npursued as an option. Hosting countries find it politically challenging to offer a legal status of\n\n3 World Bank/UNHCR, 2015, _Forced Displacement in the Great Lakes Region, A Development Response’_ . There is\nstrong readiness and increasing commitment in the GLR for a development response to forced displacement. Across\nthe GLR there is a relatively robust policy and legal framework already in place to protect those affected by conflictinduced displacement. All six countries of the GLR have signed and ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of\nRefugees, the 1967 Protocol to the Convention as well as the ‘Regional Organization of African Unity Convention\nGoverning the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa’. All six countries have also signed the ‘African\nUnion Convention for the Protection and Assistance of IDPs in Africa’ known as the 2009 ‘Kampala Convention’,\nwhich is the first continental treaty to provide a comprehensive protective framework for IDPs. These frameworks\naugment the potential for developmental responses. Moreover, in Uganda the Refugees Act of 2006 already\nrecognizes the right of refugee to work, establish businesses, and move around freely within the country and to live\nin settlements rather than camps. The Act promotes refugees’ self-reliance.\n\n\n2\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "citizenship or residency to large groups of refugees. Without this, full socio-economic integration\nis undermined as those with refugee status continue to be the target of dedicated humanitarian\nassistance, kept geographically isolated and/or constrained in their rights and freedoms. Zambia\nis setting a new global precedent in offering a comprehensive process for local integration which\ncontains provisions for both legal and socio-economic integration.\n\n\n7. A third phase of the SOP involves US$27 million financing to the Republic of Tanzania\nand is currently under preparation for delivery in FY17. This phase includes the proposal to\nsupport the Government of Tanzania in the implementation of its Strategic Plan for Local\nIntegration (SPLI). This local integration initiative would target long-term refugees from\nBurundi, the majority of whom have lived in three settlements for more than four decades and\nhave recently been granted Tanzanian citizenship. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) with\nsupport from UNHCR, is currently substantiating recommendations for local integration of these\nformer refugees through the formulation of the SPLI. The SPLI is in the process of reaching\ncompletion and approval by the Government of Tanzania. The World Bank has undertaken\nsignificant technical assistance, dialogue, and preparation with the Government of Tanzania to\ndesign a project in support of the SPLI, particularly in support of the fulfillment of activities\nunder Pillar Two: Governance and Administration, and Pillar Three, Socio-economic Integration.\nA project in support of the SPLI would align with the PDO for the Zambia portion of the\nregional PDO with the aim ‘ _to improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure_\n_for displaced people and host communities in the targeted areas of the recipient’s territory.’_\nInitially planned for delivery in FY16, this phase of the SOP has been delayed to be delivered as\npart of the third phase of the SOP in FY17 to allow time for the institutional commitment and\nresponsibilities outlined in the SPLI to be finalized.\n\n\n8. Also included in the third phase of the SOP is the proposal to create a new regional multiagency coordination forum to facilitate regional learning and knowledge exchange in support of\ndurable solutions for the displaced. It is proposed that a grant of approximately US$3 million be\ngiven to a regional organization to host, facilitate, and maintain this regional dialogue. The PDO\nfor this phase is: ‘ _to support regional learning on development responses to forced_\n_displacement’_ . This phase will also support the generation of data, which can influence policy\nformulation. The regional platform would also serve to coordinate and share lessons emerging\nunder the other phases of the SOP in DRC, Tanzania, and Zambia as well as lessons from other\ndevelopment responses in the GLR.\n\n\n_**Development Response to Forced Displacement in the Great Lakes Region**_\n\n\n9. In light of the growing global number of forcibly displaced persons and the tendency for\ntheir displacement to be long-term and unresolved, there is more than ever a pressing need to\ninvest in sustainable responses for refugees, internally displaced persons (IDPs), returnees and\nthe communities that host them. Indeed, in 2015 the international community re-galvanized by\nthe surge in the number of forcibly displaced and a sense of a global crisis, re-opened the debate\non how best to manage an effective response. While humanitarian agencies have long shouldered\nthe burden of responding to forced displacement, it is increasingly recognized that these\napproaches have limitations and therefore hosting governments and development agencies must\n\n\n3\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Plan for Local\nIntegration",
+ "confidence": 0.8243271708488464,
+ "start": 115,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY17",
+ "confidence": 0.5266409516334534,
+ "start": 97,
+ "end": 98
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SPLI",
+ "confidence": 0.5384300351142883,
+ "start": 121,
+ "end": 122
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "recommendations for local integration",
+ "confidence": 0.6424686908721924,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 177
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Burundi",
+ "confidence": 0.5392846465110779,
+ "start": 133,
+ "end": 134
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY17",
+ "confidence": 0.5041893124580383,
+ "start": 97,
+ "end": 98
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "long-term refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5071267485618591,
+ "start": 130,
+ "end": 132
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SPLI",
+ "confidence": 0.9102872014045715,
+ "start": 186,
+ "end": 187
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SOP",
+ "confidence": 0.7087317109107971,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 319
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY16",
+ "confidence": 0.5797353386878967,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "displaced people and host communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5575467348098755,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 294
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SOP",
+ "confidence": 0.5488490462303162,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region",
+ "confidence": 0.5043613910675049,
+ "start": 505,
+ "end": 508
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "become more involved in fostering durable solutions, which promote both the self-reliance of the\ndisplaced and the resilience of those communities where they settle. [4]\n\n\n10. Defining and substantiating a comprehensive development response to forced displacement\nis still a work in progress. To date, there has not been enough rigorous assessment and\nquantification of the development impacts of forced displacement nor a thorough evaluation of\nthe successes and failures of development programs to ascertain how to target interventions and\nestablish what works and under what conditions. Nevertheless, there is emerging consensus that\na number of key principles are inherent to a development response to forced displacement. [5]\nThese principles apply throughout the design of the SOP and are as follows:\n\n\n**Table 1. Principles of a Development Response to Forced Displacement**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Principle|Explanation|Benefits|\n|---|---|---|\n|Those directly affected by forced
displacement should be supported
to be self-reliant until the resolution
of their displacement.|All too often refugees, IDPs and
returnees become dependent on
external humanitarian assistance for
their protection and provision. This
risks a loss of human capital,
erosion
of
their
skills
and
entrepreneurial spirit over time,
depletion of resourcefulness and
over-reliance on expensive external
forms of assistance.|Self-reliant refugees, IDPs and
returnees equipped with skills and
resources will be better able to
rebuild
their
lives
once
their
displacement ends, in the meantime
they will also be better able to use
their existing skills to contribute
economically and socially to the
communities and societies that host
them, thus bringing development
benefits.|\n|Self-reliance requires a conducive
legal
and
policy
framework
including rights to freedom of
movement,
access
to
finance,
participation
in
governance
systems.|Where IDPs and refugees have
constrained
legal
rights
and
protection, they will be at risk of
being unable to fulfill their social
and economic potential.|A full set of legal rights enables
IDPs and refugees to participate in
society on equal terms.|\n|Self-reliance
also
requires
investment in the productive assets,
standard of living and socio-
economic access of the displaced
(such as housing, access to services
and livelihood opportunities) which
may
have
been
lost
during
displacement.|Without
these
assets,
IDPs,
refugees and returnees are at risk of
further impoverishment.|With these assets, IDPs, refugees
and returnees can better bring
economic
returns
to
their
surrounding communities.|\n|The impacts of forced displacement
on
hosting
communities
and
countries should be recognized and
mitigated.|The
arrival
and
presence
of
refugees and IDPs can put a strain
on service delivery, the job market,
housing
availability
and
environment
causing
social
grievances and negative perceptions
towards the displaced with the
potential for social tensions and
conflicts.|Addressing the impacts of forced
displacement
on
hosting
communities has the potential to
enable those hosting communities
to feel that receiving refugees and
IDPs has economic and social
benefits
leading
to
greater
tolerance, inclusion and prevention
of social conflict.|\n|As much as possible, the displaced
should
be
integrated
socially,|Keeping
refugees
and
IDPs
socially,
economically
and|Integration is a pre-requisite for
successful self-reliance and positive|\n\n\n\n4 The World Bank Group, 2015, _A Response to Global Forced Displacement_\n5 UNHCR, 2015, _Policy on Alternatives to Camps_ ; World Bank 2011, _Development Response to Forced_\n_Displacement_\n\n\n4\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Principle|Explanation|Benefits|\n|---|---|---|\n|economically, and geographically
into the wider society and not be
placed into camps.|geographically
isolated
risks
marginalization of the displaced
with
the
potential
for
impoverishment
and
social
grievances,
even
radicalization.
However in some cases particularly
at-risk
displaced
persons
may
benefit from the protection of a
camp setting.|contribution to the wider economy.
Through integration, refugees and
IDPs can contribute new skills and
behaviors to the wider society.
However
integration
poses
additional challenges including the
need for expansion of service
delivery and effects on social
cohesion.|\n|Displaced persons have distinct
vulnerabilities, which need to be
recognized and addressed.|The ability to be self-reliant can be
undermined
by
distinct
characteristics
of
forced
displacement
such
as
trauma,
impoverishment and loss, cultural
and linguistic differences
with
hosting communities.|Addressing
these
vulnerabilities
prevents their social and inter-
generational cost.|\n|There is a need for strong political
will to implement development
responses to forced displacement.|Given the potential for social
resentment towards the displaced,
strong leadership is required to
advocate
for
the
benefits
of
integration and self-reliance.|Political will can resolve constraints
and bottlenecks in responses to
forced displacement.|\n|Development responses to forced
displacement
should
be
government-led
and
embedded
within broader institutional systems
of governance and financing.|Humanitarian responses to forced
displacement tend to operate in
parallel to broader governance and
financing systems with risk of cost
inefficiencies and marginalization
of displacement concerns from
broader development progress.|Integration
of
displacement
responses into broader governance,
institutional and financial systems
can be more cost effective and
ensures mainstreaming across a
broader number of government
stakeholders.|\n\n\n\n_**Regional Response to Forced Displacement**_\n\n\n11. Part of the funding for the Project is regional International Development Assistance (IDA)\nfinancing made available under the Great Lakes Regional Initiative (GLRI) ‘ _Reviving the Great_\n_Lakes’_ . Launched in 2013, the GLRI was designed to work in support of achievement of the\nPeace, Security and Cooperation Framework (PSCF) for the DRC and the Region. The GLRI\noutlined that additional regional development assistance would be made under two pillars: (a)\naddressing vulnerable groups and improving community resilience; and (b) promoting economic\ncooperation and regional integration. Those affected by forced displacement (refugees, IDPs,\nreturnees, and the communities that host the displaced) were identified as a group for particular\nfocus under Pillar One of the GLRI.\n\n\n12. Tackling forced displacement fits well under the GLRI. Given that refugees cross\ninternational borders, displacement is by its nature a regional issue. There are regional benefits\nfor addressing forced displacement and there is a need for more concerted regional efforts to\nreach solutions. Refugees crossing international borders is a clear regional ‘spill-over effect’ of\nthe violence and insecurity within a country. In the GLR forced displacement (and the challenges\nit poses) are a particularly intra-regionally concentrated phenomenon: 81 percent of the refugees\nand IDPs hosted in the GLR originate from within the region itself. While IDPs do not cross\nborders, they are one step closer to doing so and there are regional benefits for investing in their\nstabilization at source and reducing the number of potential refugees. Promoting self-reliance\n\n\n5\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "and integration also has regional benefits, because refugees who become active social and\neconomic contributors to their hosting countries not only bring positive contributions for the\ncommunities that host them while displaced but when they return they are in a better position to\ntake back new assets, knowledge, skills and trading networks - gleaned while displaced - to\ncontribute to rebuilding and reconstruction efforts. Investing development resources in the\ndisplaced, therefore, has the potential to not only overcome their vulnerability but also to\nstabilize and invigorate both local and regional economies, and create positive dynamics between\ncountries in the region.\n\n\n13. A coordinated regional response is a prerequisite for reaching development solutions for\nimproving their prospects. The potential for this collaboration exists in the GLR. At the regional\nlevel, the Heads of State have recognized the need to jointly address refugee and displacement\nissues in order to achieve sustainable peace and security for the GLR. The 2013 ‘PSCF for the\nDRC and the Region’ commits to the return and reintegration of refugees in their respective\ncountries of origin as well as support for IDPs within DRC. This commitment was further\nincluded in the Regional Plan of Action for the PSC Framework, with an (as yet unfulfilled)\nagreement to hold a consultation for host countries and stakeholders to look at displacement from\na regional perspective (Regional Plan of Action, 5.3b). In addition, regional institutions such as\nthe African Union, the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR), and the\nOffice of the Special Envoy for the GLR all have mandates towards the furtherance of the PSCF\nfor the DRC and the Region, and towards forced displacement specifically. The ICGLR makes\ndetailed provisions for displaced persons in its Article 12 and related Protocol on the Protection\nand Assistance to IDPs, and Article 13 and related Protocol on Property Rights of Returning\nPersons. The latest Protocol was recently affirmed with the 2015 ‘ _Declaration on the Effective_\n_Implementation and Operationalization of the Protocol on Property Rights of Returning Persons_\n_in the Great Lakes Region’_ signed in Nairobi in April 2015.\n\n\n14. The regional potential to reach solutions for displaced people has already been mobilized\non several occasions in the GLR:\n\n\n - In 2015, the ‘ _Comprehensive Solutions Strategy for Rwanda Refugees’_ brought\ntogether Rwanda, together with those countries hosting Rwandan refugees –\nUganda, Zambia, DRC – in a new commitment to sustainable solutions for those\nrefugees.\n\n\n - The 2014 Strategic Framework for Local Integration (SFLI) agreed between the\ngovernments of Zambia and Angola for the awarding of full residency rights and\nintegration opportunities to former Angolan refugees in Zambia.\n\n\n - The 2007 ‘Tanzania Comprehensive Solutions Strategy (TANCOSS)’ saw\nagreement between the governments of Burundi and Tanzania over the resolution of\nstatus for a population of refugees who had moved to Tanzania in the early 1970s.\nIntegration within Tanzania was one part of this strategy.\n\n\n15. What the GLR lacks, however, is a permanent regional platform for sustained political\ndialogue, policy advancement and knowledge sharing on good practices for development\nsolutions to forced displacement. The third phase of this SOP will aim to address this gap.\n\n\n6\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PSCF for the\nDRC and the Region",
+ "confidence": 0.7266661524772644,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 178
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.8650979399681091,
+ "start": 169,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICGLR",
+ "confidence": 0.6505141854286194,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 311
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region",
+ "confidence": 0.8526273369789124,
+ "start": 373,
+ "end": 376
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9186933040618896,
+ "start": 353,
+ "end": 354
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5205355286598206,
+ "start": 353,
+ "end": 354
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Framework for Local Integration",
+ "confidence": 0.5512749552726746,
+ "start": 453,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Tanzania",
+ "confidence": 0.7075214385986328,
+ "start": 490,
+ "end": 491
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.8525750041007996,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former Angolan refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5334676504135132,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 483
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tanzania Comprehensive Solutions Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.5400437712669373,
+ "start": 490,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Tanzania",
+ "confidence": 0.8105114102363586,
+ "start": 490,
+ "end": 491
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2007",
+ "confidence": 0.7073123455047607,
+ "start": 488,
+ "end": 489
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "early 1970s",
+ "confidence": 0.6113501191139221,
+ "start": 524,
+ "end": 526
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5422953367233276,
+ "start": 516,
+ "end": 517
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2. Regional Benefits and Dimensions of the Project**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Project Phase and activities|Regional Benefit|\n|---|---|\n|Phase One: Additional Financing for the DRC Eastern
Recovery
Project.
Socio-economic
infrastructure,
livelihood opportunities and social cohesion for IDPs
and their hosting communities.|Stabilization of IDP situation in DRC and prevention
of further refugee flows in the region; Supports host
communities to bear the burden of IDP presence
mitigating social tension and conflict and further
regional
instability;
Lays
a
precedent
for
a
development response to forced displacement which
could be extended to the improved integration of
refugees from Rwanda and achievement of the regional
Comprehensive
Solutions
Strategy
for
Rwanda
Refugees|\n|Phase
Two:
Displaced
Persons
and
Border
Communities Project for Zambia. Socio-economic
infrastructure, livelihood opportunities and social
cohesion to underpin the process of local integration of
former refugees with benefits for wider communities
and engagement of local government authorities.|Seeks to finalize and render successful the regional
bilateral agreements made between Zambia and Angola
in regards to durable solutions for long term refugees;
Ensures reciprocal good treatment of Zambian
migrants to Angola with potential for enhanced social
connections and trading potential between Angola and
Zambia; Demonstrates the social and economic gain
from offering local integration, which may incentivize
other governments in the region to consider longer
term development responses to forced displacement.|\n|Potential for Phase Three: support to the SPLI for
Tanzania, and Grant to a regional institution to foster a
regional forum for political and policy cooperation,
exchange of knowledge and good practice on
development solutions for forced displacement.|Would seek to finalize and render successful the
regional bilateral agreements made between Burundi
and Tanzania in regards to durable solutions for long
term refugees; Allows exchange of knowledge and
experience on development responses to forced
displacement across governments of the GLR; Creates
a forum where further regional agreements on
acceptance and local integration of refugees might be
compared leading to policy harmonization.|\n\n\n\n**B.** **Country Context**\n\n\n16. In December 2011, at a Ministerial meeting to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the\n1951 UN Convention relating to the status of refugees, the government of the Republic of\nZambia made a pledge to facilitate the securing of a durable solution through local integration\nfor former Angolan refugees who had been living in Zambia for over four decades. In May 2013\nat the launch of the Great Lakes Region Initiative, at a AU-UN-World Bank meeting in Addis\nAbaba, and at a further meeting on the Great Lakes Region Initiative in Washington DC, in\nNovember 2013, the Government of Zambia, expressed the need for financing from the GLR\nInitiative to be used to support the communities in which the displaced persons settle, in view of\nthe pressure on the infrastructure and resources. In January 2014, the Government of Zambia, in\ncollaboration with UNHCR, produced the _Strategic Framework for the Local Integration of_\n_Former Refugees in Zambia_ (SFLI) targeting up to 10,000 former Angolan refugees who arrived\nin Zambia until 1986, and possibly up to 4,000 former Rwandan refugees, for local integration\nsupport. The Strategic Framework outlines priority actions and identifies resources required to\nimplement the government’s pledge to integrate eligible former refugees in a manner that\npromotes their legal status and socio-economic empowerment.\n\n\n7\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "durable solutions for long term refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5759576559066772,
+ "start": 304,
+ "end": 310
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regional bilateral agreements",
+ "confidence": 0.5248839259147644,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 455
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "1951",
+ "confidence": 0.6809847354888916,
+ "start": 561,
+ "end": 562
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Great Lakes Region Initiative",
+ "confidence": 0.7226899266242981,
+ "start": 615,
+ "end": 619
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9372199773788452,
+ "start": 601,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.9294780492782593,
+ "start": 689,
+ "end": 690
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "1986",
+ "confidence": 0.6648416519165039,
+ "start": 731,
+ "end": 732
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former Angolan refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7881529927253723,
+ "start": 723,
+ "end": 726
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.9192341566085815,
+ "start": 750,
+ "end": 752
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "17. The Strategic Framework supports the issuance of country of origin passports and\nresidency permits for former Angolan refugees and their relocation out of the refugee settlements\ninto two new adjacent resettlement schemes to be eventually managed by the Department of\nResettlement in the Office of the Vice President, where they will be entitled to occupy land plots.\nAn equal number of Zambians can access land property and settle.\n\n\n18. The Strategic Framework envisages a series of socio-economic infrastructure investments\n(schools, clinics, boreholes, and roads) in order to make the resettlement schemes viable places\nto live.\n\n\n19. In the course of 2015, the eligibility criteria for former refugees to receive local integration\nsupport was extended to former Angolan refugees who arrived and were in Zambia until 2003, as\nwell as former Rwandan refugees. The eligible caseload expanded from about 5,450 former\nAngolan refugees to about 12,800 former Angolan refugees, and an additional 4,000 former\nRwandan refugees.\n\n\n20. **Supporting host communities.** The World Bank provided technical assistance to ensure\nthat the Zambia SFLI gives increased attention to how local host communities adjacent to the\nformer refugee settlements can be included in the local integration process and access potential\ndevelopment benefits.\n\n\n21. This approach is especially important because the resettlement areas of Meheba and\nMayukwayukwa in Zambia are located in the more geographically isolated, rural and poorer\nareas of the countries where access to key socio-economic facilities is low and poverty is high. In\nZambia, only 46 percent of the rural population compared to 80 percent of urban dwellers are\nwithin 1 km of a school, while 28 percent of the rural population compared to 74 percent of\nurban dwellers are within 1 km of a health clinics. [ 6] Mayukwayukwa, for example, is located in\nKaoma District, where the poverty rate of 82 percent is significantly higher than the national\naverage of 62 percent. [7] Most people in both targeted Provinces live in rural areas, where access\nto key socio-economic facilities is low.\n\n\n22. In this context, the refugee settlements with long involvement and dedicated investment by\nMoHA and UNHCR have actually achieved a higher degree of service provision in some sectors\nthan many of the surrounding districts. Forty percent of the local population in Solwezi live more\nthan 6 km away from a health post and 20 percent live more than 6 km away from a primary\nschool, whereas none of the residents of the Meheba refugee settlement live more than 5 km\naway from such facilities. Investment in socio-economic and livelihood priorities for the\nsurrounding communities therefore becomes important not only to ensure integration, but also\nensure equity across this existing disparity and to address local development challenges.\n\n\n23. **Area Based Planning.** Administration of the refugee settlements as designated areas by the\nMoHA has resulted in a serious disadvantage: the settlements are not included in wider area\nbased development strategies or planning tools at the District or Provincial level. This has\npractical consequences. The initial design of the resettlement areas for former refugees was done\nin absence of consideration of the spatial economy of the wider Districts and Province or\n\n6 Central Statistics Office, 2011, _Living Conditions Monitoring Survey 2006 and 2010,_ p. 249\n7 World Bank, 2015, _Mapping Subnational Poverty in Zambia_, p. 27- 29\n\n\n8\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "eligible caseload",
+ "confidence": 0.701326847076416,
+ "start": 149,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9573417901992798,
+ "start": 137,
+ "end": 138
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.75058913230896,
+ "start": 113,
+ "end": 114
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former Angolan refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9788326025009155,
+ "start": 17,
+ "end": 20
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "_Mapping Subnational Poverty in Zambia_",
+ "confidence": 0.5150527954101562,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.989997386932373,
+ "start": 602,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia_",
+ "confidence": 0.8837722539901733,
+ "start": 611,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9933857321739197,
+ "start": 605,
+ "end": 606
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "consideration of wider service delivery planning. This resulted in a first design of resettlement\nareas, which risked further isolating former refugees from broader economic and social\nopportunities beyond the boundaries of the resettlement area. It also risked inefficiencies in\nservice delivery since facilities such as new schools and clinics for the resettlement areas were\nbeing planned without consideration of existing services in the wider districts, which might be\nexpanded to serve the resettlement areas. Technical assistance undertaken by the World Bank in\ncollaboration with UN Habitat and UNHCR resulted in a series of spatial planning\nrecommendations on how to best serve the settlements through broader infrastructure. The\nrecommendations included the need to bring the settlements more fully into local level planning\nprocesses. The World Bank-supported project is designed to contribute to the implementation of\nthis recommendation.\n\n\n24. **Social cohesion.** Given the longevity of the presence of the former refugees, there has been\nconsiderable de facto and positive integration and social interaction between the former refugees\nand the local populations. The degree and intensity of this interaction varies between the\ndifferent locations. Nevertheless, reports of conflict and tension do exist. A World Bank-UN\nreport on local integration [8] finalized in the context of this project’s preparation, revealed that\ndespite the long-term presence of former refugees in Zambia, and the proactive and welcoming\napproach of the Zambian government, risks of social tensions between former refugees and\nZambians should not be underestimated. Local chiefs are supportive of the Meheba resettlement\nscheme, but there appears to be tension in Mayukwayukwa between chiefs and some former\nrefugees living in host communities. Disputes are related to cattle circulation, and conflicts\nbetween farmers and herders, among others. Chiefs are also concerned about the strain on water\nand social services that might arise when more people move into the resettlement areas. These\ntensions are to be understood in a context where some people perceived to be of Angolan\nascendants have recently been elected in Parliament, and some chiefs and their entourage are\nconcerned about competition for political power. In addition, given the fact that in resettlement\nschemes, former refugees and Zambians will be living side by side, it will be key to ensure that\nthe newly created communities are well integrated, and that Zambians and former refugees\ninteract peacefully.\n\n\n25. A commitment to social cohesion is therefore to be mainstreamed throughout the entire\ndesign of the Project. Project implementation arrangements will include a participatory process,\ndesigned to bring together representatives of Zambians and former refugees, as well as\nvulnerable groups among both populations (including women, the youth, the elderly), in a\nprocess where they identify their priority needs as a community. The Project also has activities\nspecifically aimed at strengthening social cohesion through sensitization and conflict mitigation\ntraining, as well as through a robust communication strategy, to ensure transparency around\neligibility criteria for project benefits. Finally, the Project provides capacity building, including\nsupport to ensuring that Provincial and District authorities are mindful of the specific issues\naffecting former refugees and are prepared to handle potential conflicts between former refugees\nand host communities, and support the full inclusion of former refugees resettlement areas in\nlocal planning processes.\n\n\n8 World Bank-UN, October 2015, _Zambia: Recommendations for Improved Local Integration of Former Refugees_\n\n\n9\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "spatial planning\nrecommendations",
+ "confidence": 0.9200141429901123,
+ "start": 98,
+ "end": 101
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9528180360794067,
+ "start": 21,
+ "end": 23
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "World Bank-UN\nreport on local integration",
+ "confidence": 0.7343024611473083,
+ "start": 209,
+ "end": 215
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.9283151030540466,
+ "start": 211,
+ "end": 212
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank-UN",
+ "confidence": 0.9192201495170593,
+ "start": 209,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9035294055938721,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9175596833229065,
+ "start": 161,
+ "end": 163
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "resettlement\nschemes",
+ "confidence": 0.7340630292892456,
+ "start": 383,
+ "end": 385
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "26. **Addressing Vulnerability** . Populations in the Project’s target areas face a number of\nvulnerability factors, including: (a) extreme poverty; (b) lack of access to basic infrastructure and\nservices; and (c) climate change. Most vulnerable subgroups among former refugees and\nZambian host communities alike include female-headed households, the elderly, those with\npsychological challenges, youth, and the disabled. [ 9] Sustaining agriculture, the main source of\nlivelihoods in the refugee settlements, is one key challenge among these groups. While the\nProject will specifically include targeting of the most vulnerable households, particularly through\nlivelihood sub-project interventions, it will more broadly pay special attention to ensuring that\nthe needs of vulnerable groups are identified and that there is additional outreach to ensure their\nparticipation and inclusion as project beneficiaries. This includes ensuring equitable access to\nand voice in participatory planning processes, identification and inclusion in livelihoods subprojects, and as appropriate and feasible, targeting and inclusion of vulnerable groups in social\ncohesion initiatives. It also involves working with local government authorities to build the\ncapacity of vulnerable groups.\n\n\n27. Women face distinct impoverishing factors that contribute to vulnerability such as limited\ncontrol over household assets and undertaking a disproportionate share of income-generating\nactivities. Project activities will take into consideration the gender-differentiated needs of both\nformer refugee and host populations targeted under this Project, with attention to any specific\nadjustments to components that may be needed to ensure access as beneficiaries of female\nformer refugees and local populations.\n\n\n28. Climate change also increasingly puts vulnerable Zambians and former refugees at risk.\nZambia’s climate is highly variable, and floods and droughts have increased in frequency over\nthe past three decades. Income in both the Zambian host communities and the refugee\nsettlements is reliant on subsistence farming, non-timber forest products and casual labor, often\npaid in food, making the beneficiaries increasingly vulnerable to climate change resulting in crop\nfailures. Again, this leaves fewer resources to deal with other climate change-induced impacts\nlike worse water safety, lack of reliability of energy resources, and human and animal health\nissues.\n\n\n**C.** **Higher Level Objectives to which the Program Contributes**\n\n\n29. The proposed program falls under the first pillar of the GLRI, which explicitly calls on the\nWorld Bank to “identify new ways of providing access to livelihoods and services for currently\ndisplaced populations, recent returnees, and other war-affected groups”. [10] As for the PSC\nFramework, the program will be aligned with its benchmark 5.3, “return and reintegration of\nrefugees in their respective countries of origin, under the tripartite agreement”. [11]\n\n\n9 UNHCR, 2015, _UNHCR Angolan and Rwandan Refugee Profile as of November 6, 2015_, p. 1-2\n10 GLRI, “Reviving the Great Lakes: A World Bank Group Regional Initiative for Peace, Stability and Economic\nDevelopment”, _Draft for Discussion Only_\n11 This makes the program part of the Framework’s regional commitment 5, ‘To respect the legitimate concerns and\ninterests of the neighboring countries, in particular regarding security matters.’ The program also indirectly\ncontributes to benchmark 2.1 on the return of ex-combatants, many of whom will be IDPs or refugees; and to\ncommitment 4, on providing support to socio-economic integration in the region.\n\n\n10\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "30. The proposed operation is consistent with the FY13-16 Country Partnership Strategy (CPS)\nfor Zambia, which is in alignment with the government’s development priorities and supports\nthree objectives: (a) reducing poverty and the vulnerability of the poor; (b) improving\ncompetitiveness and infrastructure for growth and employment; and (c) improving governance\nand strengthening economic management. The outcome of the first objective is “to improve\naccess to resources for strengthening household resilience and health in targeted areas”. The\nproposed program’s local integration activities therefore align with the CPS and the Government\nof Zambia’s development priorities.\n\n\n**II.** **PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES**\n\n\n**A.** **PDO**\n\n\n31. The development objective (DO) of this regional project is to _improve access to_\n_livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host communities in the_\n_targeted areas of the recipient’s territory._\n\n\n**B.** **Program Beneficiaries**\n\n32. Beneficiaries will primarily be those persons affected by displacement who are the target of\nthe local integration initiatives, that is, former refugees and host communities in the target areas.\n\n\n33. The Project will target 14 wards (Mushawala, Luambuwa, Kashamba, Kapili, Mangango,\nMbanyutu, Nkenga, and Namafulo in the Western Province and Mwajimambwe, Matebo,\nShilenda, Mukumbi, Kibanza, and Mumena in the Northwestern Province). Two of these wards\ninclude the two resettlement areas of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa, the other 12 wards surround\nthese areas. To date, these wards are located respectively in Kaoma district (179,326 people),\nLukulu district (37,231 people), and Solwezi district (107,794 people). [12] The total target\npopulation in the three districts and 14 wards is 357,951 [13] persons, of which 16,800 former\nrefugees. Beneficiaries also include up to 16,800 eligible former refugees moving to the\nresettlement areas, and a matching number of Zambians provided access to land. It is expected\nthat some of the investments, in particular the connective infrastructure, will benefit people in the\nwider Districts and even Province.\n\n\n**C.** **PDO Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n - Direct project beneficiaries (number) (of which percentage female, former refugee,\nhost community)\n\n\n - Beneficiaries (number) with improved access to connective and socio-economic\ninfrastructure (of which percentage female, former refugees, host community)\n\n\n - Percentage of beneficiaries of livelihood subprojects who report improved food\nsecurity/income/welfare (of which percentage female, most vulnerable)\n\n\n12 Given ongoing revisions of district boundaries resulting in the split of Solwezi and Kaoma districts, the targeted\nwards might eventually fall under different districts.\n13 Zambia, 2010, _Census of Population and Housing, Zambia Central Statistical Office_\n\n\n11\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n34. All project components will contribute to supporting social cohesion and the local\nintegration of former refugees within host communities. This will be done through: (a)\nstrengthening the physical connection of the former refugee areas to the wider Districts, through\nconnective infrastructure; (b) financing socio-economic infrastructures contributing to increased\naccess to economic opportunities and services; (c) ensuring that former refugees and host\ncommunities are able to identify and prioritize together, through a participatory approach, the\nconnective infrastructure and socio-economic investments; (d) ensuring an equitable share of\nbenefits to both groups, as well as a transparent selection processes, to prevent conflict; and (e)\nsupporting planning authorities to include the former refugee areas in their planning processes.\n\n\n35. The Project includes the following components: (a) Socio-economic investments; (b)\nSupport to Livelihoods; (c) Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention; and (d) Project\nManagement.\n\n\n**Component 1: Socio-Economic Investments (US$15,000,000)**\n\n\n36. Component 1 includes sub-projects for connective infrastructures and socio-economic\ninvestments, as well as support to district and provinces to implement and monitor the subgrants. Sub-projects can be carried out either by the National Climate Change Secretariat or by\nthe District, Ward or Community, depending on the level of complexity and amount of the subproject. This component also includes technical assistance to ward and district planning\nauthorities to use the results of the above-described participatory process to revise/update/annex\nthe Ward and District Strategic Development Plans, ensuring that the resettlement areas are fully\nincluded in planning documents and processes. The component will be implemented through the\nfollowing sub-components:\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1 (a): Connective infrastructure sub-projects_\n\n\n37. The focus is on larger infrastructure designed to connect the resettlement areas with the\nsurrounding wards/districts. Given the remoteness of the two resettlement areas, there was a\nstrong demand for connective infrastructures from key stakeholders for a stronger connection\nwith opportunities and services available in the hosting and neighboring wards/districts. Given\nthe urgency of reinforcing the connection of the resettlement areas with surrounding\nwards/districts, priority connective infrastructures will be identified through a simplified\nparticipatory process that will inform the update/revision of the District Strategic Development\nPlans.\n\n\n**Table 3. Example of Potential Connective Infrastructures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Type of Sub-grant|Connectivity Impact|Example of Sub-project|\n|---|---|---|\n|Connective Infrastructure Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to nearby Ward|Road rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to market opportunities|Road rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to nearby market|Bridge rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Grant|Connection to electricity|Extension of the power grid|\n\n\n12\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "_Subcomponent 1(b): Socio-economic investment sub-projects_\n\n\n38. Socio-economic investment sub-grants will be provided at three levels, namely, district,\nward, and community level.\n\n39. **Sub-projects amounts.** Sub-project amounts will be finalized in the Project\nImplementation Manual (PIM), and approved by IDA, based on: (a) estimated average costs for\npotential typical investments; (b) a plan of covering all the wards surrounding the ward hosting\nthe resettlement areas, up to 4 priority communities to be selected within each target ward; (c)\nthe total number of target districts covering the target wards for the Project; (d) an assumption\nthat sub-grants disbursement will happen during 4 of the 5 years of the Project; and (e) an\nadditional amount for the grants for the districts, wards, and communities hosting former\nrefugees.\n\n\n**Table 4. Examples of Potential District, Ward, and Community Level Sub-Projects**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Type of Sub-
grant|Socio-Development
Impact|Example of Sub-project|\n|---|---|---|\n|District/Ward
Level|Increased access to social
services|
Construction or rehabilitation of school
Construction or rehabilitation of clinic
Construction of city center to attract private services
(Bank, postal services, etc)
Provision of solar panels for social services
infrastructures
|\n|District/Ward
Level|Increased economic
opportunities|
Construction or rehabilitation of market
Construction of training center
Facilitation of links to micro-finance institutions
Rehabilitation of canals
Construction or rehabilitation of wells and boreholes
|\n|Community|Increased access to social
services|
Support to community school (solar panels, training
for teachers, rehabilitation, construction, provision of
books)
Construction or rehabilitation of community hall
|\n|Community|Increased economic
opportunities|
Construction or rehabilitation of hammer mill shelter
Construction or rehabilitation of town center
commercial building|\n\n\n\n40. Socio-economic investment sub-project proposals will be assessed against a series of\neligibility criteria, including among others: : (a) demonstrated contribution to local development;\n(b) shared benefits for both former refugees and host communities; (c) shared benefits with\nidentified most vulnerable groups; (d) no increase in vulnerability to climate change (preference\nwill be given to sub-projects that foster resilience to climate change); (e) guarantee that funds\nhave been budgeted to ensure maintenance and, if relevant, staffing; (f) compliance with\nsafeguards requirements (Category A sub-projects are ineligible); and (g) elimination of subprojects that are not technically feasible.\n\n\n**Component 2: Support to Resilient Livelihoods (US$825,000)**\n\n\n13\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "41. Support to livelihoods will be supported through: (a) priority access to employment for\nlocal population, in the vicinity of the district connective infrastructure as well as socioeconomic infrastructures to be funded through the project; and (b) community-level livelihood\nsub-grants.\n\n42. **Works.** To contribute to livelihoods of local populations especially of the most\nvulnerable, for sub-projects that include contracting of construction companies, low skilled labor\nwill be required to largely come from local populations, including both men and women, former\nrefugees and Zambians, and prioritizing most vulnerable households, as per requirements to be\ndetailed in the PIM. The beneficiary targeting process will be transparent and inclusive with a\nstrong communication strategy and a set of objective selection criteria.\n\n\n43. **Community level livelihood sub-grants** will target up to 4 priority communities per\nyear identified in the targeted wards, with a specific focus on the resettlement areas. To help\ninform communities’ choices, a preliminary assessment of livelihood opportunities was\nconducted as part of a joint World Bank-UN consultancy in preparation for this Project. [14] In\naddition, a livelihood opportunities study will be conducted at the beginning of the Project in the\ntwo areas of targeted intervention to identify more precisely key opportunities to support\nlivelihoods and to ensure communities’ choices are based on well- informed strategies. Fifty\npercent of community level sub-grants will be earmarked for beneficiaries meeting the criteria of\nmost vulnerable (to be defined in the PIM). Potential sub-projects to be financed under the\nComponent are expected to complement and multiply positive impacts of the socio-economic\ninfrastructures built under the Component 1, for example to support capacity building and small\nmaterials for vulnerable women’s groups to set up a kitchen garden near a market structure, or to\nprovide agribusiness training for a new farmers’ group who can benefit from a rehabilitated road\nto a bigger market. In addition, priority will be given to livelihood sub-projects that contribute to\nclimate resilience.\n\n\n**Component 3: Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention (US$1,000,000)**\n\n\n44. The first way to promote social cohesion through the Project will be through a\nparticipatory process ensuring (a) full transparency of the process through which sub-grants are\nallocated, and (b) the design and implementation of a widespread and clear communication\nstrategy for the Project.\n\n45. In addition, the Project will include: (a) Sensitization sessions on coexistence and conflict\nmitigation, during participatory discussions at community, ward, and district levels; and (b)\nsupport to community integration activities, including both Zambians and former refugees (to be\nclarified in more detail in the PIM).\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management (US$3,175,000)**\n\n\n46. This Component will cover the cost for project management, implementation and\nsupervision of project activities, administration of procurement and financial management,\n\n\n14 World Bank-UN, October 2015, _Zambia: Recommendations for Improved Local Integration of Former Refugees_\n\n\n14\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "monitoring and evaluation, and safeguards compliance monitoring. Also, the Component will\nsupport the Commission for Refugees and the Department of Resettlement that will assist with\nthe monitoring of project implementation, as well as the monitoring of the overall local\nintegration process implemented in Zambia. Finally, this Component will cover costs associated\nwith inter-regional learning and knowledge exchanges.\n\n\n47. **Linkages with other Projects.** The Project will seek synergies with the following\nprojects: (a) The Zambia: Strengthening Climate Resilience Project (P127254) also implemented\nby the National Climate Change Secretariat, and which uses a similar Community Demand\nDriven approach in the Western Province; (b) the Health Services Improvement Project\n(P145335) that seeks to improve the quality of health services including in the Western and\nNorthwestern Provinces; (c) the Girls Education and Women’s Empowerment and Livelihood\nProject (P151451) that supports access to livelihoods for women and education for girls; and (d)\nthe Water Resources Development Project (P114949) contributing to the improvement of small\nscale water resources infrastructure.\n\n\n**A.** **Project Financing**\n\n\n**Financing Arrangement**\n\n\n48. The total cost of the Project is US$20 million. Financing of country-level activities comes\nfrom US$10 million regional IDA funds and US$10 million national IDA allocation.\n\n\n49. The eligibility for the use of regional IDA funds is four-fold: (a) the SOP involves three\neligible countries under the GLR Initiative – DRC, Tanzania, and Zambia. Since DRC is a fragile\nstate, the SOP can proceed on the basis of two participating countries; (b) the project addresses\nregional spill-over effects. Forced displacement has regional implications not only because\nrefugees are a burden shared by multiple countries but also because IDPs are potential refugees\nand the economic, social and political implications of their displacement could have negative\nspill-over effects for other countries in the region, which, in turn, can negatively affect\ndevelopment prospects through reduced trade and damaged infrastructure; (c) there is strong\ncountry ownership of the strategies, which underpin the design of the project; and (d) the project\nwill enhance the harmonization of policies and practice related to forced displacement across the\nGLR. In particular, the third phase of the SOP will support a regional institution, providing a\nplatform for high-level discussions on policy harmonization to tackle some of the underlying\nroot causes of forced displacement.\n\n\n**Project Cost and Financing**\n\n|Table 5. Project Financing (US$)|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**Project Component**|**Amount (US$)**|\n|1: Socio-economic Investments|15,000,000|\n|2: Support to Resilient Livelihoods|825,000|\n|3: Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention|1,000,000|\n|4: Project Management|3,175,000|\n|**Total IDA**|**20,000,000**|\n|Counterpart Contributions|1,115,000 (10%
contributions to|\n\n\n\n15\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|connective and socio-
economic infrastructure)|\n|---|---|\n|**Total Project Costs**|**21,115,000**|\n\n\n50. Additionally, the Government will allocate funds for (i) maintenance and staffing in\nrelation to sub-projects, and (ii) gratuity for project staff.\n\n\n**B.** **Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Program Design**\n\n\n51. **Lessons learned from the first phase of the SOP in DRC.** Although the first phase of the\n\nProgram in DRC is still in the early stages of implementation, some useful lessons have been\nlearned, which will be applied in this second phase.\n\n\n - While emphasizing community participation in the selection of sub-projects, the DRC\n\nproject evidences the need for strong and early engagement with local governments in the\nselection of sub-projects, who should also have a voice in the selection to streamline the\nselection with local government development priorities. This approach has been\nincorporated into the project design for Zambia with significant attention to aligning the\nselection process with local planning authorities, at district and provincial level.\n\n - The design of the DRC project emphasized the importance of promoting community\n\nownership through community contributions to sub-project budgets. Nevertheless, during\nimplementation it is evident that communities that are strongly affected by forced\ndisplacement tend to be poorer than the others and have trouble raising the required\ncommunity contribution. Such limitations have to be assessed and taken into account in\nproject design. For phase two of the SOP, a preliminary review of contributions provided\nby communities in similar community driven sub-projects in the target Provinces of\nZambia revealed that in practice communities have contributed between 10 and 15% of\nthe total cost. The 10% contribution was thus established as a conservative estimate.\n\n52. **Lessons learned on forced displacement.** The project design is specifically informed by\nthe emerging experience on development responses to forced displacement and seeks to\noperationalize them as described below:\n\n\n**Table 6. Operationalization of a Development Response to Forced Displacement**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Principle of a Development
Response to Forced Displacement|Operationalization through the Zambia Displaced Persons and Border
Communities Project|\n|---|---|\n|Self-reliance requires a conducive
legal
and
policy
framework
including rights to freedom of
movement,
access
to
finance,
participation
in
governance
systems.|_The Zambia Strategic Framework for Local_ Integration has granted long
term refugees a full set of citizenship/residency legal rights along with
commitment to socio-economic integration. Policy and programmatic
frameworks are in place to move this forward. The project will support
implementation and fulfillment of the SFLI.|\n|Self-reliance
also
requires
investment in the productive assets,
standard of living of the displaced
and socio-economic access of the
displaced.|The project will invest in improvement of socio-economic infrastructure
and access to services for former refugees, refugees, IDPs and returnees.
The project will invest in skills and assets to improve the livelihoods of
those affected by forced displacement.|\n|The impacts of forced displacement|The project is designed to target those communities adjacent to or affected|\n\n\n16\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Principle of a Development
Response to Forced Displacement|Operationalization through the Zambia Displaced Persons and Border
Communities Project|\n|---|---|\n|on
hosting
communities
and
countries should be recognized and
mitigated.|by refugee and IDP populations. Project activities and benefits will spread
to surrounding communities, villages, wards and districts.|\n|As much as possible, the displaced
should
be
integrated
socially,
economically and geographically
into the wider society.|The Project will roll out and ensure the fulfillment of recent government
commitment for full integration of long term refugees and phasing out of
long term refugee settlements. The Project will embed a strong commitment
to social cohesion throughout the implementing arrangements and also by
funding distinct conflict prevention and social cohesion activities. These
activities are intended to overcome negative perceptions and to improve
positive interactions between the displaced and the local communities.|\n|Displaced persons have distinct
vulnerabilities, which need to be
recognized and addressed.|The Project is aimed at removing displacement-related vulnerabilities such
as lack of freedom of movement and lack of rights for citizenship
engagement.|\n|There is a need for strong political
will to implement development
responses to forced displacement.|Political will for local integration has already been achieved and was a pre-
requisite for the activities proposed under this Project.|\n|Development responses to forced
displacement
should
be
government-led
and
embedded
within broader institutional systems
of governance and financing.|The Project will be fully implemented by government agencies and funds
will flow through government systems. There will be mechanisms set up for
inter-ministerial cooperation and coordination in regards to project
implementation. The Project will underpin and support a shift in
governance away from a system where refugee settlements are administered
under refugee law in isolation of other governance frameworks and of local
government administration, and towards an arrangement where local
government authorities adopt more responsibility and accountability for
managing the former refugee settlements.|\n\n\n\n53. **Lessons learned on engaging target communities through participatory processes.**\nThe project design incorporates lessons learned on effectively engaging target communities in\nidentifying and addressing their development needs. Experiences worldwide suggest that\nconsultations with and participation of target beneficiaries have both instrumental benefits (better\nneeds assessments, improved efficiency, and sustainability of investments) and value-based\nbenefits (empowerment and capacity building of affected communities). [15] Interventions with\nemphasis on community consultation and participation have proven to help support social\ncohesion, foster inclusion of marginalized groups, and contribute to decentralization. [16] These\napproaches are supported by clear communication strategies, incentives through visible outputs,\ninclusion of vulnerable groups, and involvement of local authorities for sustainability. All these\naspects have been included in the project design, in particular through: (a) Investments in\nComponents 1 and 2 will be identified through a participatory process, designed to include\nvulnerable groups; (b) Component 1 includes a fast-track approach for larger connective\ninfrastructure, so as to provide visible outputs early in project implementation; and (c)\nComponent 3 will include a clear communication strategy.\n\n\n54. **Lessons learned on resettlement.** The Project involves supporting the sustainable\nsettlement of former refugees. Complex projects that have involved large scale resettlement\n\n\n15 The Brookings Institution and University of Bern, 2008. “ _Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Consultation and_\n_Participation with Populations Displaced by Conflict or Natural Disasters”._\n16 World Bank, 2011. “ _World Development Report: Conflict, Security, and Development_ ”.\n\n\n17\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "revealed the importance of identifying and addressing the needs of resettled beneficiaries, and\nthe importance of involving them in key decisions relating to their resettlement, through\nparticipatory processes. [17] Lessons learnt in particular highlight the usefulness of ensuring that\nvulnerable and marginalized groups are included in this process, and that potential conflicts are\nmitigated. [18] In particular, sustainable resettlement tends to be facilitated by support to\nestablishing sustainable livelihoods. [19] These lessons learnt are incorporated in the Project\nthrough the strong focus on participatory approaches, designed to include vulnerable groups\n(Components 1 and 2), support to resilient livelihoods (Component 2), support to conflict\nprevention, and inclusion of grievance redress mechanisms (Components 3 and 4).\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A.** **Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n**Partnership and Coordination**\n\n\n55. All aspects of the Project will require substantial investment in partnership and\ncoordination at two levels: (a) inter-ministerial cooperation within national institutions; and (b)\ncollaboration with other donors and international partners, especially UNHCR.\n\n\n56. The SFLI, launched in 2014, is the central framework for the ongoing local integration\nprocess. At the national level, coordination of activities towards the SFLI will be facilitated\nthrough the National Advisory Group for Local Integration, the national arm of the Solutions\nAlliance, including all key national and international partners involved in the local integration\nprocess. In addition, coordination between key Ministries and national institutions involved in\nthe local integration process will continue to take place through the Inter-Ministerial Steering\nCommittee on Local Integration. These two groups are already in place and will continue to play\nan advisory and coordination role of the local integration process.\n\n\n57. At the regional level, partnership and coordination on development responses to forced\ndisplacement will be achieved through the proposed regional forum, to be established under the\nthird phase of the SOP. Through this forum, lessons and experience from the different phases of\nthe SOP will be shared with the group for regional learning. Likewise, this group will be asked to\nlend its weight to forging regional policy and political dialogue to support program activities on\nthe ground.\n\n\n58. As evidenced by the recent joint World Bank-UNHCR report on forced displacement,\nUNHCR has been a key partner in the conceptualization and design of this Program. This is a\ndeeply important partnership for many reasons. First, UNHCR has detailed knowledge and\nunderstanding of the refugee populations across the world, and this knowledge is invaluable for\n\n17 World Bank, 2008, _Rampur Hydropower Project Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Community Development_\n_Practices_, p. 17; World Bank, 2008, _Using Involuntary Resettlement on Highway Projects to Alleviate Poverty: A_\n_Case Study from the Hubei Shiman Highway Project in China_, p.3; World Bank, 2015, _Land acquisition and_\n_resettlement: Lessons learned – ICMM_, p. 24\n18 World Bank, 2015, _How to Note on Application of Social Safeguards Policies to Community-Driven Development_\n_Projects_, p.8\n19 The Brookings Institution and University of Bern, 2008. _Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Consultation and Participation_\n_with Populations Displaced by Conflict or Natural Disasters_\n\n\n18\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "the design of relevant project activities. Second, UNHCR has a well-organized field presence in\nthe former refugee settlements and continues to provide invaluable logistical support to World\nBank teams in accessing these remote areas. Third, UNHCR has the technical staff and expertise\nto coordinate the legal aspects of local integration (obtaining legal residency and citizenship\nrights), which are still ongoing. Legal integration (supported by UNHCR) and socio-economic\nintegration (supported by the proposed World Bank-supported Program) will both contribute to\nthe effective local integration of former refugees. Fourth, UNHCR has provided invaluable\nsupport to the SFLI and maintains an important technical role in strengthening and implementing\nthese strategies.\n\n\n**Project Implementation**\n\n\n59. The Project will be implemented by the National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS)\ncurrently under the Ministry of Finance, which gives it authority to coordinate line Ministries in\nthe exercise of their cross-cutting mandate. At the provincial level, Provincial Project\nImplementation Units under the NCCS are overseen by the Chief Planner, who plays a central\nrole in planning at provincial and district levels.\n\n\n60. The NCCS was selected as the implementing agency for the Project, based on : (a) the\nconfirmed need for climate resilience programming; (b) strategic institutional positioning and\nstrong track record of the NCCS acting as a coordinator and facilitator of numerous government\nstakeholders at both national and local levels; (c) proven experience and capacity to successfully\nundertake a large scale Community Driven Development process; (d) cost and time-efficiency\n(the NCCS is already implementing with success a World Bank-supported project [ _Zambia:_\n_Strengthening Climate Resilience Project_ (P127254)], with an office in Lusaka, as well as a\ndecentralized PIU already established and functioning in the Western Province; (e)\nimplementation and fiduciary track record of the NCCS in implementing the ‘ _Zambia:_\n_Strengthening Climate Resilience Project’_, mitigating fiduciary and implementation risks related\nto numerous infrastructure sub-projects in remote areas; and (f) existing financial mechanisms\nand experience channeling funds directly from the designated account to the district, ward, and\ncommunity level, for the implementation of sub-projects.\n\n\n61. At the local level, NCCS will play a convening role across various local government\noffices and functions facilitating and coordinating the implementation of the Project at district,\nward, and community levels, through local level planning authorities. Given the remoteness of\nthe two areas of intervention and logistical difficulties of managing the Project from the national\nSecretariat, the Project would assist the Western and Northwestern provinces and the target\ndistricts, through two decentralized PIUs established in the Western (Mongu) and Northwestern\n(Solwezi) Provinces.\n\n\n**B.** **Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n62. Project-level Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems will be complemented by close\nWorld Bank implementation support. NCCS will develop data collection, analysis and\ndissemination mechanisms to generate information on program progress. At the same time, the\nM&E system will be a means to generate much-needed quantitative and qualitative data on the\nsituation of the displaced.\n\n\n19\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "63. It is well recognized that currently there is a dearth of data on the situation of the\ndisplaced in the GLR, especially when it comes to development outcomes. This undermines the\nability of governments to make evidence-based policy decisions regarding the displaced. For this\nreason, all projects under each phase of the Program will invest in the generation of new data on\nthe displaced and their hosting communities. Project finances will be allocated to baseline\nsurveys, impact surveys and population profiles.\n\n\n**C.** **Sustainability**\n\n\n64. The sustainability of project activities will be ensured through: (a) sustainability of socioeconomic investments; (b) investment in long term social cohesion; and (c) support to the\ninclusion of the settlement areas in local development and planning processes.\n\n\n65. **Sustainability of socio-economic investments.** A key eligibility criteria for socioeconomic investment is a clear operations and maintenance plan, including the budgeting from\nthe responsible institution of resources for maintenance and, when relevant, staffing. In addition,\nthe plans for these infrastructures will be made so as to use simple design, with locally available\nmaterial. When possible, these investments should also support resilience to climate change.\n\n\n66. **Long term social cohesion.** The impact of the Project on the local integration of former\nrefugees will only be sustainable if local populations also realize dividends from the local\nintegration process, and if the Project supports social cohesion between former refugees and\nlocal communities. Methods for achieving both of these have been described above.\n\n\n67. **Inclusion of settlement areas in local planning processes.** The Project will embed as\nmany of the project activities as possible into government systems for sustainability. Socioeconomic investments will be mainstreamed into regular planning, maintenance, and operational\nprocesses and budgets. Continued development of the two resettlement areas targeted under this\nproject will only be ensured if they are considered by local level authorities as under their\nresponsibility, and become fully included in long term development planning. **[20]**\n\n\n68. At a GLR regional level, the sustainability of the Program lies in two aspects. First, the\nthird phase of the SOP will set up a regional forum that should be able to build on the progress\nmade under the proposed program. Members of this forum all have non-negotiable mandates to\nwork on forced displacement and this will ensure their ongoing participation and action beyond\nthe life of the World Bank-supported program. Second, the World Bank will ensure wide\ndissemination of the outcomes of a development approach to forced displacement to other donors\nworking in the GLR. This may catalyze additional financing for promising approaches in\nZambia.\n\n\n20 Note that the planning process in Zambia is in the process of being revised, as per the 2015 Urban and Regional\nPlanning Act. Planning for the resettlement areas will be embedded in the most relevant planning tools, as per the\nlatest laws and regulations pertaining to local planning in Zambia.\n\n\n20\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**V.** **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n**Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks**\n\n|Risk Category|Rating|\n|---|---|\n|1. Political and Governance|Substantial|\n|2. Macro-economic|Substantial|\n|3. Sector Strategies and Policy|Moderate|\n|4. Technical design of Program|Moderate|\n|5. Institutional capacities|Moderate|\n|6. Fiduciary|Moderate|\n|7. Environmental and Social|Moderate|\n|8. Stakeholders|Moderate|\n|9. Other (elite capture)|Substantial|\n|OVERALL|Substantial|\n\n\n\n69. _Political and governance risk is_ _Substantial._ The topic of forced displacement remains\nhighly sensitive across the GLR and is still relatively new to the World Bank. While there are\nstrong signs that the time is right for more open dialogue and cooperation between countries to\nachieve durable solutions for forced displacement, Governments still face political risks in\nchoosing to pursue development responses to forced displacement, often associated with public\nperception. Nevertheless, there is increasing political commitment for former refugee integration\nacross a broad coalition of government partners, which mitigates the political sensitivity risks.\n\n\n70. _Macro-economic risk is Substantial._ Growth of the Zambian economy has averaged 6.3\npercent since 2011 and inflation has been stable in recent years, but external and domestic\npressures are expected to slow economic growth to around 4 percent in 2015. Falling copper\nprices have presented an extra headwind to the economy, the Kwacha has weakened\nconsiderably, limited and poorly timed rains have reduced agricultural output and power outages\nhave become ever more frequent. Achieving fiscal consolidation, providing reliable electricity,\nand balancing spending from subsidies and toward poverty reduction remain major challenges\nfacing Zambia. The World Bank has developed a series of activities to address some of these\nrisks, including a programmatic Advisory Services and Analytics (ASA) to support the\nGovernment in improving economic and fiscal management.\n\n\n71. _Additional risks_ . These include the potential for elite capture both of decisions\nsurrounding project investments, particularly under Component 1, at both central and local\nlevels. Intensive assessments were undertaken during project preparation to ensure that preidentified investments listed by local planning authorities are in alignment with needs expressed\nby targeted communities. Funds allocated for activities are commensurate with identified needs,\nwhich minimizes the potential for elite capture in the prioritization process. At the same time, a\ncritical mitigation measure relates to the quality and rigor of intended selection\nprocesses. Participatory processes will ensure adequate consultation with key stakeholders,\nincluding government partners and targeted communities, particularly in order to facilitate\ninclusion of the voice and perspective of vulnerable beneficiaries in decision-making processes.\nKey activities to mitigate against the risk of elite capture include: (i) participatory processes that\nfoster inclusion of key stakeholders and representation of vulnerable groups in the selection\nprocess (e.g. elderly, women, former refugees, youth); (ii) eligibility criteria of connective\ninfrastructure that specifies the need to demonstrate clear positive impact for the most\n\n\n21\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "vulnerable; and (iii) the requirement that 50 percent of livelihoods sub-projects target the most\nvulnerable.\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A.** **Economic and Financial Analysis**\n\n\n72. An economic and financial analysis was conducted as part of preparation for the overall\nSOP. This analysis was carried out with a view to informing a wider analytic debate on the\neconomic and social returns for a development response to forced displacement as compared to a\nhumanitarian response. To date, there is very little available quantitative analysis, which\ncompares the costs, efficiency and types and levels of returns across the two approaches. This\nanalytic approach was prioritized over assessing the exact economic rationale of distinct\nactivities under the Project, especially as many of those activities are still to be defined through\nfurther during selection processes in the course of project implementation.\n\n\n73. In addition, there is already ample evidence from other demand-driven projects in\nZambia of the positive economic rate of return (ERR) and net present value (NPV) for the types\nof socio-economic infrastructure, which is likely to be invested in under the Project (see Annex\n3). Besides predicted positive returns from the project activities, it is also predicted that local\nmarkets will be impacted both on the supply and demand side. On the supply side, activities\nimplemented under the Livelihoods Component are aimed at increasing productivity for smallscale farmers by providing, among others, diversified livelihoods and improved\ncommercialization. On the demand side, the Project will contribute to job creation through\nincreased opportunities for low skilled labor and employment on works funded under the Project.\nIt is estimated that road rehabilitation could create up to 60,000 days of work, with the potential\nto increase household income revenue by 30 percent.\n\n\n74. Fieldwork was conducted in DRC, Tanzania, and Zambia to ascertain the costs, benefits\nand efficiencies associated with two contrasting scenario: (a) scenario one: the costs, benefits and\nefficiencies associated with management of the former refugee settlements through continuing\ncurrent practice – that is, administered under refugee law by the Ministry of Home Affairs with\nsupport by UNHCR mainly channeled through parallel financing; (b) scenario two: the costs,\nbenefits and efficiencies associated with new forms of management of the refugee settlements –\nthat is, with responsibility and funding channeled through broader government systems,\nincorporation of the settlements in local planning, a focus on improved connectivity of the\nsettlements and the potential to also target broader districts and host communities in this\narrangement.\n\n\n75. The analysis concluded that the main economic benefits associated with scenario one as\ncompared to scenario two are:\n\n\n - Injection of additional targeted humanitarian funding to the area for service\nprovision in settlements, with spill-over benefits for local populations. Over the last 40\nyears, targeted funding for the settlements has resulted in a per capita service delivery\ninvestment approximately four times greater in the settlements as compared to in the\nsurrounding districts.\n\n\n22\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "76. The analysis concluded that the main economic benefits associated with scenario two\ncompared to scenario one are as follows:\n\n\n - Increase in available development financing for local government authorities.\n\n\n - Improved equity in per capita service delivery investments between settlements\nand wider population.\n\n\n - Economic and social benefits will accrue to a wider population.\n\n\n - Improved integration will have greater economic and social dividends. With\nimproved connection between the resettlement areas and wider areas there will be an\nincrease in trade and economic transactions in regards to this produce resulting in\nincreased availability of products and decreased prices.\n\n\n - Cost efficiencies associated with incorporation of the settlements into mainstream\ngovernment planning and resource allocation.\n\n\n - Cost efficiencies associated with delivery of services through public provision;\nthe analysis showed that schools and health centers constructed through government\ncounterparts under the project would be 32 and 47 percent respectively less expensive\nthan comparable activities implemented by humanitarian counterparts, private entities\nand NGOs.\n\n\n77. Nevertheless, scenario two will also present new costs for the local government\ninstitutions specifically related to the impact of recurring operational and maintenance costs on\ntheir budgets. Reoccurring costs for the local government under scenario two are likely to be\nincreased given that UNHCR currently subsidizes those costs including staff salaries, benefits,\ndrugs and fuel. For Meheba, 60 percent of the staff employed in the clinics in the settlements are\npaid for by UNHCR alone. There will need to be careful planning by the line ministries over\ntime to absorb these costs.\n\n\n78. The value added of the World Bank engagement in the SOP lies in its ability to bring\ntechnical solutions from a development perspective to the particular situations of forced\ndisplacement. Relevant technical skills includes supporting efficient and accountable government\nfund flow systems to finance local level government-led activities, supporting cost-effective\ndesign for infrastructure and service provision, and using contextual planning tools to assess\nneeds in broader development context and supporting long term social integration.\n\n\n**B.** **Technical**\n\n\n79. All works on socio-economic investments made under the project will be subject to\ntechnical scrutiny to ensure that they meet adequate design and engineering standards; when\navailable, they will follow government-mandated standard blue-prints (for example, primary\nschools and health centers). This will be achieved through a number of quality control and\nsupervision checks in the project cycle, details of which will be given in the PIM. To begin with,\nall socio-economic investments prioritized by communities through a participatory process will\n\n\n23\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "undergo a financial, technical and environmental feasibility assessment. Quality control of\ndesigns and construction and rehabilitation works will be ensured by the NCCS through the\ncompetitive hiring of qualified surveyors and engineers as well as the selection of qualified and\ncompetent contractors to design and implement works. World Bank implementation support will\nalso contribute to quality control through careful scrutiny of procurement processes and on-site\ninspection of works to quickly identify and remedy deficiencies.\n\n\n80. The Project will build upon the existing technical capacity within the implementing\nagency reinforced with the implementation support offered through qualified engineers in the\nProject team.\n\n\n**C.** **Financial Management**\n\n\n81. A Financial Management (FM) assessment was conducted on all implementing agencies\nfor the project. The objective of the assessment was to determine whether the implementing\nentities have acceptable financial management arrangements in place that satisfy the Bank’s\nOperation Policy/Bank Procedure (OP/BP) 10.00. These arrangements would ensure that the\nimplementing entities: (a) use project funds only for the intended purposes in an efficient and\neconomical way; (b) prepare accurate and reliable accounts as well as timely periodic interim\nfinancial reports; (c) safeguard assets of the project; and (d) have acceptable auditing\narrangements. The FM assessment was carried out in accordance with the Financial Management\nManual for World Bank Investment Project Financing Operations that became effective on\nMarch 1, 2010 and issued (retrofitted) on February 4, 2015.\n\n\n82. The conclusion of the assessment is that the financial management arrangements in place\nmeet the World Bank’s minimum requirements under OP/BP10.00 and are therefore adequate to\nprovide, with reasonable assurance, accurate and timely information on the status of the Project\nas required by the World Bank. Nevertheless risks for successful FM management and the need\nfor mitigation measures were identified as follows:\n\n\n**Table 7. Financial Risks and Mitigation Measures**\n\n|Agencies Assessed|Risk Rating|Required Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|---|\n|NCCS|Moderate|(a) Preparation of plan to connect to the Integrated
Financial Management Information System (within
two months of effectiveness); (b) Recruitment of a
Project Accountant to be in charge of the project’s
financial operations; and (c) the Bank to conduct
training in the Bank’s financial management and
disbursement guidelines to the recruited Project
Accountant.|\n\n\n\n**D.** **Procurement**\n\n\n83. Procurement for the proposed Project will be carried out in accordance with the World\nBank’s \"Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD\nLoans and IDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers\" dated January 2011 and updated\nJuly 2014; and \"Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and\nIDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers\" dated January 2011 and updated July 2014,\n\n\n24\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial, technical and environmental feasibility assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.513386607170105,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 9
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "implementing agencies",
+ "confidence": 0.6719475388526917,
+ "start": 132,
+ "end": 134
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financial Management Information System",
+ "confidence": 0.9775753021240234,
+ "start": 407,
+ "end": 411
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "“Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD\nLoans and IDA Credits and Grants, (the Anti-Corruption Guidelines)” dated October 15, 2006\nand revised in January 2011, and the provisions stipulated in the Legal Agreement. The\nprocurement procedure to be followed for National Competitive Bidding (“NCB”) shall be the\nopen bidding procedure set forth in the Public Procurement Act, 2008, Act. No.12 of 2008, as\namended by the Public Procurement (Amendment) Act, 2011, Act No. 15 of 2011 (the “PPA”),\nand the Public Procurement Regulations, 2011, Statutory Instrument No. 63 of 2011\n(the “Regulations”); provided, however, that such procedure shall be subject to the provisions of\nSection I and Paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 of Section III, and Appendix 1 of the “Guidelines for\nProcurement of Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and IDA\nCredits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers” (January 2011) (the “Procurement Guidelines”),\nand the additional provisions as provided in Annex Two – Detailed Project Description under\n“Procurement”.\n\n84. A procurement capacity assessment of the implementing agency for the Project was\ncarried as part of project preparation. The assessment concluded that procurement management\narrangements in place are adequate and compliant to the Procurement Guidelines. Nevertheless,\nrisks for successful Procurement management and the need for mitigation measures were\nidentified as follows:\n\n\n**Table 8. Procurement Risks and Mitigation Measures**\n\n|Agencies Assessed|Risk|Required Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|---|\n|NCCS|Moderate
|(a) The NCCS coordinator and the financial
management specialist should carry out training and
sensitization of all staff to ensure procurement
decision making is fully covered in the Manual of
the Agency and is available/known to staff; (b)
NCCS to prepare a plan to acquire the necessary
procurement expertise: agency staff needs to
increase knowledge in procurement in general.
Internal quality assurance needs to be enhanced.
Staff numbers need enhancing with expected
increase in workload. Agency needs to enhance
contract management expertise for quality and
timely delivery of services, works and good; (c)
with regards to evaluation and award of contracts,
staff needs to be trained in good evaluation
practices which base decisions on pre-disclosed
criteria.|\n\n\n\n**Procurement methods to be used for the Project**\n\n\n85. Particular methods of procurement of goods and works are as follows:\n\n\n(a) International Competitive Bidding. Except as otherwise provided, goods and works\n\nshall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive\nBidding (ICB).\n(b) Other methods of procurement of goods and works. The following list specifies the\n\nmethods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding which may be\n\n\n25\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement capacity assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9610790014266968,
+ "start": 226,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Risks and Mitigation Measures",
+ "confidence": 0.6519894003868103,
+ "start": 285,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NCCS",
+ "confidence": 0.5539675951004028,
+ "start": 316,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "International Competitive Bidding",
+ "confidence": 0.6846587061882019,
+ "start": 537,
+ "end": 540
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances\nunder which such methods may be used:\n\n(i) National Competitive Bidding\n(ii) Procurement from UN agencies\n(iii) Force Account\n(iv) Shopping\n(v) Direct Contracting\n(vi) Community Participation in Procurement (CDD)\n\n86. Particular methods of procurement for consulting services are:\n(a) Quality and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS). Except as otherwise provided in the\n\nparagraph below, consultants services shall be procured under contracts awarded on\nthe basis of Quality and Cost-Based Selection.\n(b) Other methods of procurement of consultants’ services. The following list specifies\n\nselection methods, other than Quality and Cost-Based Selection, which may be used\nfor consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under\nwhich such methods may be used:\n\n(i) Quality-Based Selection (QBS)\n(ii) Selection based on the Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)\n(iii) Least-Cost Selection (LCS)\n(iv) Single-Source Selection for firms (SSS)\n(vii) Individual Consultants (IC)\n(viii) Single-Source Selection for IC (SSS).\n\n\n**E.** **Social Inclusion and Social Safeguards**\n\n\n87. The social dimensions of work with populations affected by forced displacement are\nespecially important. For this Project these dimensions include: (a) a commitment to the\ninclusion of especially vulnerable groups in the integration process; (b) a focus on ensuring\ngender equity; (c) a commitment to citizen engagement and representation; (d) a commitment to\nmainstreaming the principle of social cohesion through project design; and (e) adherence to\nWorld Bank policies on land acquisition and resettlement.\n\n\n88. **Gender Equity.** The report _Forced Displacement in the_ _Great Lakes_ identified the strong\ngender dimensions to the impacts of displacement in the GLR. Women who are IDPs, refugees\nor returnees face multiple constraints including exposure to high levels of gender-based violence,\ninadequate control over their health and other endowments, limited economic opportunities and\nlack of access to or control over assets and resources. Displacement can also disrupt social\nrelations and change gender roles, with both positive and negative consequences. Shifting\nhousehold dynamics can enable new responsibilities and opportunities for women across\neconomic, social and civic dimensions. At the same time, these changes can sometimes\ncontribute to increased household resentment, particularly from male partners who perceive their\nown disadvantage, and further cycles of violence. The Program, therefore, will pay attention to\nhow gender empowerment can occur with sensitivity to prevailing social norms but with an eye\ntoward advancing more equitable access to opportunities and benefits extending from the\nProject. Although this Project will not directly address Gender-Based Violence (GBV) either\nthrough prevention or response interventions, it will endeavor to ensure associated activities do\n\n\n26\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "not exacerbate incidence of or heighten exposure to violence. The NCCS Safeguards Manager is\nin the process of receiving mentorship support from a Gender Expert, to broaden her skills on\nmanaging Gender-related aspects of the project.\n\n\n89. **Citizen Engagement.** The report also noted that the role of displaced persons in\nrepresentative decision-making and governance structures is usually highly limited and rarely\nextends beyond a camp or settlement setting to more mainstream government structures. Shifting\nthis picture is a distinct objective of the projects where the aim is to include the settlements into\nmainstream government service delivery. However, preliminary diagnostic work indicates that\nthe shift will not only be institutional, involving the setting up and management of these\nstructures to cover the refugee populations, but will also be attitudinal. The Project will invest in\nworking with local authorities and the local population to consider the former refugees as truly\nequal citizens without prejudice and discrimination.\n\n\n90. **Social Cohesion.** Besides the distinct Component 3, which will fund social cohesion\nactivities, the use of participatory community-driven processes in the selection of socioeconomic investments will be central to achieving cohesion between displaced and hosting\ncommunities under the Project. Not only does this approach encourage general citizen\nengagement in project activities (with participatory planning leading to better-informed project\nchoices), it will also facilitate both sets of beneficiaries working together to make development\ndecisions for mutual benefit. Zambia has experience in and has used this approach to ensure\ninclusion of vulnerable social groups at community, ward, and district levels. This process can\ncontribute to increased trust, the creation of shared interests and it can also provide a forum for\nagency and voice for those who have been used to centralized decision making.\n\n\n91. **Land Acquisition.** The Project triggers OP/BP 4.12 as there may be some land\nacquisition and temporary impact on livelihoods to facilitate road rehabilitation works and smallscale community infrastructure works (health centers, schools, latrines, etc.) foreseen in\nComponent 1. A Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) was prepared, consulted upon, and\ndisclosed prior to Appraisal of the project. The RPF will guide the development of site specific\nResettlement Action Plans, which will be developed as needed during project implementation.\nThe RPF also provides detailed guidelines on processes for undertaking, documenting, and\nkeeping records of voluntary land donations.\n\n\n92. The Strategic Framework on Local Integration of Former Refugees includes provision of\nan alternative legal status, as well as an integrated relocation program, implemented by the\nGovernment through the Commission for Refugees, with the support of UNHCR. This process,\nstarted in 2014, provides access to land ownership to eligible former refugees and an equal\nnumber of Zambians. Currently about 12,800 former Angolan refugees, and 4,000 former\nRwandan refugees are eligible for the local integration process. This process is independent of\nthe World Bank-funded project, and is funded by the Government of Zambia and implemented\nby the Commission for Refugees, with support from UNHCR. The UNHCR-supported land\nallocation activities will bring important benefits to the targeted population in the form of secure\nland rights (including for those currently living in the area of the new settlements). The World\nBank has reviewed the methodology being employed in the UNHCR-supported activities and\nconsiders it satisfactory. While it is possible that the planning of the new settlements and the\nparceling of land could result in minor loss of land for some existing inhabitants (including the\n\n\n27\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "long-term refugees) these ongoing activities are not part of the World Bank-supported project\nand are not necessary to achieve project objectives, i.e., to improve access to livelihoods and\nsocio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host communities in the targeted areas.\nTherefore, OP/BP4.12 does not apply.\n\n\n**F.** **Environment (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n**Climate Change Screening**\n\n\n93. There are two general aspects of climate change to be potentially considered by the\nproject: Adaptation covers a wide range of activities that will enhance the ability to respond to\nclimate change-related issues such as sea level rise, storms, floods, and drought, threats to water\nresources, health, infrastructure, and agriculture. Adaptation measures usually include climate\nchange impact analysis as well as \"climate proofing\" of sectors, geographic areas and specific\nprojects. The Project’s will include activities that (a) are relatively small scale investments, (b)\nhave scope for easily reacting to climatic trends (for example, in road rehabilitation or support to\nagricultural activities) and, moreover (c) possess an inherent flexibility to react to changing\nclimatic condition, should this become necessary (for example, when a community decides and\nplans the upgrading of buildings and infrastructure, resilience can be built with minor additional\nefforts). Adaptation will thus be promoted as one of the key design principles for the scope of\nplanned activities, but will not require freestanding, broad analytical or planning efforts.\n\n\n94. Mitigation efforts are targeted at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by measures\nsuch as improved energy efficiency, increased use of renewable energy sources, sustainable\ntransport initiatives, and carbon sequestration. While resource economy and energy efficiency\nwill be an important design criteria in all components, especially those dealing with physical\ninvestments and livelihood generation, the Project will not target specific measures to reduce,\nand possibly market, GHG emissions.\n\n\n95. A Climate and Disaster Risk Screening Report for the regional Program revealed that the\npotential impacts of the Project vary by sector and time period. The community development\naspects of the Program (including policy development and long-term strategic planning) may\nsignificantly reduce the impacts of climate hazards. The social development aspects of the\nProgram, such as capacity building and training, may significantly reduce the impact of climate\nhazards, both currently and in the future. Access to technology provided by the program can also\nsignificantly reduce the impact of climate hazards. The potential impact of the overall program is\nhighly exposed to climate hazards, whereas the outcomes for community development are at low\nrisk, while the social development outcomes are moderately exposed to climate hazards.\n\n\n**Environmental Safeguards**\n\n\n96. OP/BP 4.01 has been triggered and overall, the program has an environmental category B\nrating, as large scale, significant, or irreversible environmental or social impacts are not\nexpected.\n\n\n97. Since the exact locations of the activities and scope of works are not yet identified, the\nrelevant instrument is an Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF). The type\nof activities that might cause adverse impacts include: (a) the construction or rehabilitation of\n\n\n28\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "connective infrastructure (roads, bridges, extension of electric grid); (b) the construction or\nrehabilitation of community infrastructures such as schools, health centers, water points; (c) the\nrehabilitation of community roads; and (d) water conservation works, as well as solid waste\nmanagement.\n\n\n98. OP/BP 4.36 on Forests, was also triggered as the resettlement areas have high vegetation\nand forest cover. The integration of former refugees with the host communities will further\nincrease incidences of encroachment, charcoal production, logging for timber and the cutting\ndown of forests to open up the areas to farming activities. The ESMF provides for the\ndevelopment of Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) that will propose\nmitigation measures to address the potential environmental and social impacts of the Project.\n\n\n99. OP/BP 4.09 on Pest Management was also triggered, as a precautionary measure in\nrelation to livelihood sub-projects, and is addressed through the ESMF as well.\n\n\n**G.** **Other Safeguards Policies Triggered**\n\n\n100. The Project triggers OP/BP 4.04 on Natural Habitats so that the Project team can identify,\nassess and manage activities that could induce direct or indirect significant impacts on natural\nhabitat, fauna, flora, or biodiversity from being selected and financed by the Project. Moreover,\nactivities such as road rehabilitation may happen in overgrown areas in or adjacent to natural\nhabitats. The ESMF includes measures for avoiding or, if unavoidable, mitigating, impacts on\nfauna and flora in natural habitat areas. The ESMF includes a screening checklist that will ensure\nthat the Project will not affect or involve critical natural habitats.\n\n\n**H.** **Summary of Safeguards Policies**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Safeguards Policies|Triggered?|Explanation (Optional)|\n|---|---|---|\n|Environmental
Assessment OP/BP 4.01|**Yes**|The Project will support the construction or rehabilitation of connective
infrastructure (links to main roads, bridge rehabilitation, extension of
power lines), and the construction or rehabilitation of socio-economic
infrastructures (schools, health centers, water points, etc), selected
through a demand driven and consultative approach, as well as support to
small livelihood activities. The Project is expected to have a moderate
environmental footprint, with minor negative impacts that are not
expected to be significant, cumulative or irreversible. Since the exact
locations of the activities and scope of works are not yet identified, the
relevant instrument is an Environmental and Social Management
Framework (ESMF). An ESMF has been prepared, consulted upon,
disclosed prior to Appraisal. The ESMF guides the screening of the sub-
projects and their categorization and also the development of
Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMP) once specific
activities and locations have been identified. The ESMPs will be
prepared, consulted with local communities and disclosed prior to
commencement of detailed planning and physical works. Management
and supervision requirements for the physical, chemical and biological
environment (waste, water and sanitation etc), health and safety of
construction workers and safety and security of neighboring communities
are built into the ESMF.|\n|Natural Habitats OP/BP|**Yes**|This policy is triggered in relation to activities (such as road rehabilitation|\n\n\n29\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Safeguards Policies|Triggered?|Explanation (Optional)|\n|---|---|---|\n|4.04||or other infrastructural projects) that could induce direct or indirect
significant impacts on natural habitats, fauna, flora, or biodiversity either
due to proximity or due to extended impact during construction and/or
operations. The ESMF includes guidelines to avoid as much as possible
projects affecting natural habitats (e.g. by choice of location / alignment
of physical investments), as well as screening checklists and relevant
mitigation measures to avoid or, if unavoidable, minimize, mitigate,
compensate or offset (following the mitigation hierarchy) impacts on
fauna and flora and natural habitats. Any sub-projects negatively
affecting critical natural habitats will not be considered for financing.|\n|Forests OP/BP 4.36|**Yes**|While it is not expected that the Project will overlap with forestry
reserves, the resettlement areas have partial forest cover. The integration
of former refugees with the host communities will further increase
incidences of encroachment, charcoal production, logging for timber and
the cutting down of forests to open up the areas to farming activities. The
ESMF provides mitigation measures that address the potential
environmental and social impacts on the Project associated with forests.|\n|Pest Management OP/BP
4.09|**Yes**|OP/BP 4.09 was triggered as a precautionary measure in relation to
livelihood support that may involve activities supporting agricultural
activities. The ESMF will include guidelines for avoiding the use of
pesticide when possible, and provides guidelines and mitigation measures
in cases when this would not be avoidable. The ESMF includes
recommendations and guidelines for use of non-chemical fertilizers and
pesticides, where possible.|\n|Physical Cultural
Resources OP/BP 4.11|**No**||\n|Indigenous Peoples
OP/BP 4.10|**No**|Screening has confirmed the absence in the project area of people who
meet the criteria of OP/BP4.10.|\n|Involuntary Resettlement
OP/BP 4.12|**Yes**|There may be some land acquisition and temporary impact on livelihoods
to facilitate road rehabilitation works and small scale community
infrastructure works (health centers, schools, latrines, etc). While it is
expected that there may be temporary impacts on livelihoods to facilitate
road
rehabilitation
and
other
socio-economic
and
connective
infrastructure works, it is expected that most of the land for these
constructions will be either Government owned or voluntarily donated.
OP/BP 4.12 has been triggered as a precautionary measure in relation to
the
connective
and
socio-economic
infrastructure.
Since
these
infrastructures will be identified during project implementation through a
participatory process, sub-project locations are not yet known, and for
that reason, an RPF has been prepared and disclosed prior to appraisal.
Relevant Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) will be prepared, consulted
upon, and disclosed, as needed.|\n|Safety of Dams OP/BP
4.37|**No**||\n|Projects on International
Waterways OP/BP 7.50|**No**||\n|Projects in Disputed Areas
OP/BP 7.60|**No**||\n\n\n30\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**I.** **World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n101. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a project\nsupported by the World Bank may submit complaints to existing project-level grievance redress\nmechanisms or the World Bank’s Grievance Redress Service. This service ensures that\ncomplaints received are promptly reviewed in order to address project-related concerns. Projectaffected communities and individuals may also submit their complaint to the World Bank’s\nindependent Inspection Panel, which determines whether harm occurred, or could occur, as a\nresult of World Bank non-compliance with its policies and procedures. Complaints may be\nsubmitted at any time after concerns have been brought directly to the World Bank's attention,\nand Bank Management has been given an opportunity to respond. Additional information on how\nto submit complaints to the World Bank’s corporate Grievance Redress Service is available\nonline at www.worldbank.org/GRS, while additional information on how to submit complaints\n[to the World Bank Inspection Panel can be found at www.inspectionpanel.org.](http://www.inspectionpanel.org/)\n\n\n31\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring**\n\n\n**Country: Zambia**\n\n**GLR: Displaced Persons & Border Communities (P152821)**\n\n\n**Results Framework**\n\n\n**Project Development Objectives**\n\n\nPDO Statement\n\n\nTo improve access to livelihoods and socio-economic infrastructure for displaced people and host communities in the targeted areas of the\nrecipient’s territory.\n\n**These results are at** Project Level\n\n\n**Project Development Objective Indicators**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Cumulative Target Values|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|
YR5
|End Target|\n|Direct project beneficiaries
(Number disaggregated
female/former refugees/hosts) -
(Core)|0.00|30,080|71,140|132,185|202,715|253,250|250,250|\n|Beneficiaries with improved
access to connective and socio-
economic infrastructure
(Number disaggregated
female/former refugees/hosts)|0.00|0|20,000|60,000|110,000|150,000|150,000|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood
subprojects who report improved|0.00|n/a|50|50|60|60|60|\n\n\n32\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Intermediate Results Indicators**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Cumulative Target Values|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|
YR5
|End Target|\n|Number of completed
infrastructure sub-projects (by
sub-project type)
(Number)|0.00|To be determined annually|To be determined annually|To be determined annually|To be determined annually|To be determined annually|40
Given the participatory
nature of the project, the
target will be established
on a yearly basis, based
on
demand.
It
is
estimated that about 40
infrastructure
sub-
projects
will
be
completed.|\n|Share of infrastructure
built/rehabilitated by the project
that is climate resilient
(Percentage)|0.00|n/a|70|70|70|70|70.00|\n|Share of approved socio-
economic infrastructure
subprojects that are or will be
integrated into government
planning and budget exercises
(Percentage)|0.00|n/a|70|75|80|80|80.00|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihoods sub-
projects
(Number disaggregated by
female/vulnerable)|0.00|100|1,000|2,000|2,500|3,000|3,000|\n\n\n33\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Number of people participating
in community-based decision-
making/participatory planning
exercises
(Number)|0.00|30,000|50,000|70,000|90,000|100,000|100,000|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Number of people who have
participated in social cohesion
activities under the project
(Number)|0.00|30,000|50,000|70,000|90,000|100,000|100,000|\n|Share of former refugees who
report having good relations with
host communities
(Percentage)|To be
determined|40%|40%|50%|50%|60%|60.00
End target will be
adjusted based on
the results of the
baseline survey.|\n|Number of plans in districts or
wards mainstreamed with climate
resilience (Number)|
0.00|0|0|1|2|3|3.00|\n|Number of individuals
participating in regional
knowledge and learning
exchanges
(Number)|0.00|0|10|25|35|50|50.00|\n|Number of individuals
participating in capacity building
trainings
(Number)|0.00|80|130|160|180|200|200.00|\n|||||||||\n\n\n**Indicator Description**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n**Project Development Objective Indicators**\n\n\nIndicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency Data Source / Methodology Responsibility for Data\n\n\n34\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "baseline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9928131699562073,
+ "start": 220,
+ "end": 222
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.740001380443573,
+ "start": 221,
+ "end": 222
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9780776500701904,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9886530041694641,
+ "start": 369,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Col2|Col3|Col4|Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Direct project beneficiaries|Direct beneficiaries are people who
directly derive benefits from an
intervention under the project|Quarterly|Monitoring Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Beneficiaries with
improved access to
connective and socio-
economic infrastructure|Number of beneficiaries reported in sub-
project proposals and verified by the
District that are estimated to benefit from
connective infrastructure and socio-
economic infrastructure subprojects,
reported once the infrastructure is
completed.|Quarterly|Sub-project Proposals
Monitoring Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood
subprojects who report
improved food security,
income and/or welfare|Percentage of surveyed beneficiaries of
livelihoods subprojects under Component
2 who report improvements on: food
security, income and/or welfare|Baseline,
Yr2, Yr4,
Yr5|Beneficiary survey|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n\n\n\n**Intermediate Results Indicators**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Description (indicator definition etc.)|Frequency|Data Source / Methodology|Responsibility for Data
Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Number of completed
infrastructure sub-projects
(by sub-project type)|This indicator will be broken down by
type of social services or infrastructure
with an agreed set of measurement
guidelines (e.g., #of km of roads; #of
bridges; #of km of electricity grid; #of
boreholes, #of schools; #of hospitals)|Quarterly|Monitoring Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Share of infrastructure
built/rehabilitated by the
project that is climate
resilient|Share of completed sub-projects that
include at least one climate resilience
feature.|Quarterly|Monitoring Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Share of approved socio-
economic infrastructure|This indicator will be based on the
information to be obtained at the district-|Quarterly|Project proposals|District Planning Sub-
Committee|\n\n\n35\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9577831029891968,
+ "start": 60,
+ "end": 62
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8211329579353333,
+ "start": 155,
+ "end": 157
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Beneficiary survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6148679256439209,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 241
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.978112518787384,
+ "start": 396,
+ "end": 398
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9516592621803284,
+ "start": 453,
+ "end": 455
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|subprojects that are or will
be integrated into
government planning and
budget exercises|level appraisal process, that ensures a
commitment from relevant line ministries,
local government authorities that project-
funded infrastructures will be included in
their planning process, and budgeted for
staffing, equipment, and maintenance
costs|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Beneficiaries participating
in livelihoods sub-projects|The indicator will be broken down into the
following sub-categories for supplemental
information: share of female beneficiaries
and share of vulnerable beneficiaries|Quarterly|Monitoring Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Number of people
participating in community-
based decision-
making/participatory
planning exercises|This indicator will track the number of
people participating in consultation
activities or participatory planning
exercises where relevant under
Components 1, 2 and 3.|Quarterly|Monitoring reports;
Attendance/Consultation
Reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Number of people who
have participated in social
cohesion activities under
the project|This indicator will track the cumulative
number of people who attended relevant
sessions.|Quarterly|Attendance sheets|National Climate Change
Secretariat (with
information from District of
Provincial-level project
teams)|\n|Share of former refugees
who report having good
relations with host
communities|Former refugees sampled who report good
relations with Zambians|Baseline,
Yr2, Yr4,
Yr5|Beneficiary survey|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n|Number of plans in districts
of wards mainstreamed
with climate resilience|Number of plans that have incorporated a
climate resilience dimension|Quarterly|District/Ward-level plans|District Planning Sub-
Committee and Provincial-
level Implementation Unit|\n|Number of individuals
participating in regional
knowledge and learning|Indicator to be broken down by number of
participants in learning exchanges by
country|Quarterly|Regional attendance reports|No description provided.|\n\n\n\n36\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8962109684944153,
+ "start": 154,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7976785898208618,
+ "start": 110,
+ "end": 111
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Attendance sheets",
+ "confidence": 0.8145252466201782,
+ "start": 304,
+ "end": 306
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8487152457237244,
+ "start": 337,
+ "end": 339
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Regional attendance reports",
+ "confidence": 0.6125296950340271,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "country",
+ "confidence": 0.673906147480011,
+ "start": 489,
+ "end": 490
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "exchanges\n\n\nNumber of individuals\nparticipating in capacity\nbuilding trainings\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|This indicator will track the number of
government staff participating in capacity
building exercises across central, regional,
district/provincial and ward levels.|Quarterly|Attendance reports|National Climate Change
Secretariat|\n\n\n\n37\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Attendance reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9806619882583618,
+ "start": 74,
+ "end": 76
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "government staff",
+ "confidence": 0.9713449478149414,
+ "start": 46,
+ "end": 48
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National Climate Change",
+ "confidence": 0.7317326068878174,
+ "start": 77,
+ "end": 80
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "government staff",
+ "confidence": 0.6923884749412537,
+ "start": 46,
+ "end": 48
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 2: Detailed Project Description**\n\n**GLR: Displaced Persons & Border Communities (P152821)**\n\n**A.** **Background**\n\n\n1. **Local integration in Zambia.** Zambia has hosted refugees and asylum seekers since the\n1960s. The country currently hosts about 50,000 mainly Angolan, Rwandan and Congolese\nrefugees and former refugees in Meheba settlement (Solwezi District, Northwestern Province)\nand Mayukwayukwa settlement (Kaoma District, Western Province) [21] . In December 2011, at a\nMinisterial meeting to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the 1951 Convention relating to the\nstatus of refugees, the government of the Republic of Zambia made a pledge to facilitate the\nsecuring of a durable solution through local integration for about 10,000 Angolan refugees who\nhad been living in Zambia for over four decades. In January 2014, the government of Zambia in\ncollaboration with UNHCR produced the _Strategic Framework for the Local Integration of_\n_Former Refugees in Zambia_, targeting up to 10,000 former Angolan refugees who arrived in\nZambia until 1986, and possibly up to 4,000 former Rwandan refugees, for local integration\nsupport. The Strategic Framework outlines priority actions and identifies resources required to\nimplement the government’s pledge to integrate eligible former refugees in a manner that\npromotes their legal status and socio-economic empowerment. The Strategic Framework\nsupports the issuance of country of origin passports and residency permits for former Angolan\nrefugees and their relocation out of the refugee settlements of into two new adjacent resettlement\nschemes to be eventually managed by the Department of Resettlement in the Office of the Vice\nPresident, where they will be entitled to occupy land plots. The Strategic Framework envisages a\nseries of socio-economic infrastructure investments (schools, clinics, boreholes, and roads) in\norder to make the resettlement schemes viable places to live.\n\n\n2. While the Strategic Framework sets a new global standard on how to promote the local\nintegration of former refugees, there have been some challenges in its implementation. With\nseveral bureaucratic steps involved, the pace of issuing residency permits has been slow. In\naddition, until recently, limited numbers of former refugees had formally expressed interest in\nmoving into the resettlement areas. In September 2015, the World Bank, in collaboration with\nthe United Nations Resident Coordinators Office in Lusaka, the UNHCR, the United Nations\nHuman Settlement Program (UN Habitat), and the United Nations Development Programme\nreviewed progress in implementation of the Strategic Framework. As of August 2015, a total of\n5,450 former Angolan refugees had been screened and deemed eligible for local integration\n(4,072 in Meheba settlement and 1,378 in Mayukwayukwa settlement). Further, 1,596 had\nreceived Zambian alien cards, 2,197 had been issued national Angolan passports, and 456 had\nreceived resident permits. A total of 1,209 plots of land had been surveyed and demarcated in the\nresettlement areas, and 456 plots had been allocated to former Angolan refugees, and 149 to\nZambians. In addition a number of socio-economic infrastructures are in process in the\nresettlement areas, and neighbouring communities.\n\n\n21 A re-delimitation of a number of Districts is currently ongoing in Zambia. While Meheba was initially located\nwithin the boundaries of Solwezi District, and Mayukwayukwa of Kaoma District, it is possible that they would\neventually fall within the boundaries of different Districts.\n\n\n38\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.9426113963127136,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Meheba settlement",
+ "confidence": 0.6788504719734192,
+ "start": 492,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8486297130584717,
+ "start": 417,
+ "end": 418
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6109511852264404,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 404
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.6900826692581177,
+ "start": 461,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Meheba settlement",
+ "confidence": 0.7145789265632629,
+ "start": 492,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.6148691177368164,
+ "start": 467,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former Angolan refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9703260064125061,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "3. Based on this review, the World Bank and UN agencies issued joint recommendations to\nthe government of Zambia, with a view of addressing limitations in the design and\nimplementation of the Strategic Framework. Identified limitations in the Strategic Framework\ninclude: (a) limited capacity and human resources allocated to the processing of resident permits,\ncreating delays in implementation of the alternative legal status component; (b) weaknesses in\nthe design of the resettlement program (including gridline plot allocation system preventing the\ncreation of villages and contributing to geographically isolating beneficiaries, and resettlement\nareas located far from main roads); and (c) lack of inclusion of the resettlement areas in the\ndevelopment planning of the wider districts, limiting mutual benefits of investments in the two\nareas. Concrete recommendations, necessary for the successful implementation of the proposed\nZambia component of the _GLR: Displaced Persons and Border Communities Project_, were\nmade. Implementation of these recommendations is ongoing and has been followed by a faster\nissuance of legal documents, allocation of land plots, and progressive move of former refugees\nfrom the refugee settlements to the resettlement areas.\n\n\n4. In the meantime, in the course of 2015, the eligibility criteria for former refugees to\nreceive local integration support was extended to former Angolan refugees who arrived in\nZambia until 2003, as well as former Rwandan refugees. The eligible caseload expanded from\nabout 5,450 former Angolan refugees, to about 12,800 former Angolan refugees, and an\nadditional 4,000 former Rwandan refugees.\n\n\n5. **Supporting host communities.** The World Bank has undertaken technical assistance to\nensure that the Zambia SFLI give increased attention to how local host communities adjacent to\nthe former refugee settlements can be included in the local integration process and access\npotential development benefits. As described above, global experience shows that responses to\nrefugees are more sustainable and socially cohesive when they include broad support for hosting\ncommunities. The Strategic Plans have therefore been enhanced to look beyond the settlement\nand re-settlement areas and identify socio-economic investments to be made at the wider district\nlevel to promote local integration with mutual benefits for former refugees and host\ncommunities.\n\n\n6. This approach is especially important because the re-settlement areas of Meheba and\nMayukwayukwa are located in the more geographically isolated, rural and poorer areas of the\ncountries where access to key socio-economic facilities is low and poverty is high. [22]\nMayukwayukwa, for example, is located in Kaoma District, where the poverty rate of 82 percent\nis significantly higher than the national average of 62 percent. [23] Most people in both targeted\nProvinces live in rural areas, where access to key socio-economic facilities is low. For example\n46 percent of the rural population compared to 80 percent of the urban dwellers are within 1 km\nof a school, while the numbers are 28 percent compared to 74 percent for health clinics. [24]\n\n\n7. In this context, the refugee settlements with long involvement and dedicated investment\nby MoHA and UNHCR have actually achieved a higher degree of service provision in some\n\n\n22 In Zambia, only 46 percent of the rural population compared to 80 percent of urban dwellers are within 1 km of a\nschool, while the numbers are 28 percent compared to 74 percent for health clinics. Central Statistics Office, 2011,\n_Living Conditions Monitoring Survey 2006 and 2010,_ p. 249\n23 World Bank, 2015, _Mapping Subnational Poverty in Zambia_, p. 27- 29\n24 Zambia Central Statistics Office, 2011, _Living Conditions Monitoring Survey 2006 and 2010,_ p. 249\n\n\n39\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gridline plot allocation system",
+ "confidence": 0.6982781291007996,
+ "start": 86,
+ "end": 90
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.599000871181488,
+ "start": 8,
+ "end": 10
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9117428064346313,
+ "start": 20,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "eligible caseload",
+ "confidence": 0.5583484172821045,
+ "start": 251,
+ "end": 253
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9172715544700623,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8592718839645386,
+ "start": 217,
+ "end": 218
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5160413384437561,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 198
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Strategic Plans",
+ "confidence": 0.5782068371772766,
+ "start": 360,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "sectors than many of the surrounding districts. For example, 40 percent of the local population in\nSolwezi live more than 6 km away from a health post and 20 percent live more than 6 km away\nfrom a primary school, whereas none of the residents of the Meheba refugee settlement live more\nthan 5 km away from such these facilities. Investment in socio-economic and livelihood\npriorities for the surrounding communities therefore becomes important not only to ensure\nintegration, to ensure equity across this existing disparity and to address local development\nchallenges.\n\n\n8. Significant development challenges in the target areas relate to reliance on subsistence\nagriculture and constrained access to water. Climate change, affecting both the Western and\nNorthwestern Provinces, puts an additional strain on already vulnerable beneficiaries. Zambia’s\nclimate is highly variable, and floods and droughts have increased in frequency over the past\nthree decades. Income in both the Zambian host communities and the refugee settlements is\nreliant on subsistence farming, non-timber forest products and casual labor, often paid in food,\nmaking the beneficiaries increasingly vulnerable to climate change-related crop failures. [25]\n\n\n9. **Area Based Planning.** Administration of the refugee settlements as designated areas by\nthe MoHA has resulted in a serious disadvantage: the settlements are not included in wider area\nbased development strategies or planning tools as the district or provincial level. This has\npractical consequences. Initial design of the re-settlement areas for former refugees was carried\nout in absence of consideration of the spatial economy of the wider districts and province or\nconsideration of wider service delivery planning. This resulted in a first design of resettlement\nareas, which risked further isolating former refugees from broader economic and social\nopportunities beyond the boundaries of the re-settlement area. It also risked inefficiencies in\nservice delivery since facilities such as new schools and clinics for the resettlement areas were\nbeing planned without consideration that existing services in the wider districts might be\nexpanded to serve the resettlement areas. Technical assistance undertaken by the World Bank in\nassociation with UN Habitat resulted in a series of spatial planning recommendations on how to\nbest serve the settlements through broader infrastructure. The recommendations included the\nneed to bring the settlements more fully into local level planning processes. The World Banksupported project is designed to implement these recommendations.\n\n\n10. **Access to Land.** The Government has dedicated parts of the refugee settlements to new\nresettlement schemes, where eligible former refugees and an equal number of Zambians can\naccess land property and settle. Each eligible household receives a plot of a minimum of 5\nhectares, up to 10 hectares as per the Department of Resettlement guidelines for resettlement\nschemes (depending on proximity to main roads). Access to land in the two resettlement areas\nfollows the same principles as for the resettlements schemes nationwide. To receive land plots,\neligible former Angolan refugees have to submit an application that is then reviewed by the\nrefugee officer and the Department of Resettlement. Once the application is approved, a plot\nwith a plot number, is allocated to the household. The household is issued a Letter of Occupancy\nproviding the former refugees the right to occupy and farm the land. After two years of farming\nthe land, the Department of Resettlement issues a Letter of Offer specifying all the steps and fees\nrequired to apply for land titles. The land allocation process is not linked to the Project, and\nentirely funded through Government funds and support from UNHCR.\n\n\n25 World Bank, 2013, _Zambia Strengthening Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase II) Project Appraisal Document_, p. 1\n\n\n40\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "spatial planning recommendations",
+ "confidence": 0.8404546976089478,
+ "start": 378,
+ "end": 381
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8433629870414734,
+ "start": 305,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "11. **Social cohesion.** Given the longevity of the presence of the former refugees there has\nbeen considerable de facto and positive integration and social interaction between the former\nrefugees and the local populations. The degree and intensity of this interaction varies between\nthe different locations. Nevertheless, reports of conflict and tension do exist. This seems to occur\nparticularly due to the different and parallel administrative structures in place for the former\nrefugees in the settlements as compared to the local population and some resentment over the\nperceived ‘special treatment’ received by the former refugees especially in regards to their\nrelative higher levels of service provision through UNHCR. A World Bank-UN report on local\nintegration [26] finalized in the context of this project’s preparation, revealed that despite the longterm presence of former refugees in Zambia, and the proactive and welcoming approach of the\nZambian government, risks of social tensions between former refugees and Zambians should not\nbe underestimated. Local chiefs are supportive of the Meheba resettlement scheme, but there\nappears to be tensions in Mayukwayukwa between chiefs and some former refugees living in\nhost communities. Disputes are related to cattle circulation, and conflicts between farmers and\nherders, among others. Chiefs are also concerned about the strain on water and social services\nthat might arise when more people move into the resettlement areas. These tensions are to be\nunderstood in a context where some people perceived to be of Angolan ascendants have recently\nbeen elected in Parliament, and some chiefs and their entourage are concerned about competition\nfor political power. In addition, given the fact that in resettlement schemes, former refugees and\nZambians will be living side by side, it will be key to ensure that the newly created communities\nare well integrated, and that Zambians and former refugees interact peacefully.\n\n\n12. The risk of social tensions and the potential of negative attitudes to de-rail successful\nlocal integration is not be underestimated. A commitment to social cohesion is therefore to be\nmainstreamed throughout the entire design of the project. The institutional arrangements, the\nchoices of investments made, the representation of different stakeholders, the level of\ntransparency and the implementation of activities will all be done in such a way that positive\ncontact is fostered between the former refugee communities and the local communities in which\nthey reside.\n\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries**\n\n13. The target areas will be the two resettlement areas of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa as\nwell as the surrounding wards and districts. Wards neighboring the resettlement areas are\ntargeted based on the principle of extending benefits to surrounding communities.\n\n\n14. Beneficiaries include up to 16,800 eligible former refugees moving to the resettlement\nareas, and a matching number of Zambians provided access to land. The Project will also target\nthe wards hosting and surrounding Mayukwayukwa resettlement area (Mushawala, Luambuwa,\nKashamba, Kapili, Mangango, Mbanyutu, Nkenga, and Namafulo), and Meheba resettlement\narea (Mwajimambwe, Matebo, Shilenda, Mukumbi, Kibanza, and Mumena). These wards are\nlocated respectively in Kaoma district (179,326 people), Lukulu district (37,231 people), and\n\n\n26 World Bank-UN, October 2015, _Zambia: Recommendations for Improved Local Integration of Former Refugees_\n\n\n41\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Meheba resettlement scheme",
+ "confidence": 0.9802750945091248,
+ "start": 184,
+ "end": 187
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7562345266342163,
+ "start": 169,
+ "end": 171
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "project",
+ "confidence": 0.572108805179596,
+ "start": 372,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Solwezi district (107,794 people). The total target population in the three districts and 14 wards\nis 357,951 [27] persons, of which 16,800 are former refugees.\n\n\n15. In both areas, most of the population lives in poverty, with restricted access to services.\nKaoma district’s poverty rate is 82 percent, while several mining companies in Solwezi are\npushing the poverty rate down to 50 percent. [28] The majority of the beneficiaries of the Project\nlive in rural areas, where access to key socio-economic facilities is low. For example 46 percent\nof the rural population compared to 80 percent of the urban dwellers are within 1 km of a school,\nwhile the numbers are 28 percent compared to 74 percent for health clinics. [29]\n\n\n16. Vulnerable sub-groups among former refugees and Zambian host communities alike\ninclude female-headed households, the elderly, those with psychological challenges, and the\ndisabled. Vulnerable groups tend to face challenges in sustaining agriculture, the main source of\nlivelihoods in the refugee settlements. A 2013 study on vulnerability in Zambia found that\nwomen-headed households were more likely to experience hunger than male-headed households,\nand that those in Kaoma district generally experienced more food insecurity than that of\nSolwezi. [30] In the refugee settlements, approximately 6 percent of the Angolan [31] and 10 percent\nor the Rwandan refugees are considered to be particularly vulnerable. [32] Women face risks of\nsexual and gender-based violence and challenges in controlling livelihood assets like land.\nWithin the refugee population, social and economic marginalization coupled with the lack of\nfreedom of movement to engage in trade, further inhibits the ability to sustain livelihoods.\n\n\n17. Climate change also increasingly puts vulnerable Zambians and former refugees at risk.\nZambia’s climate is highly variable, and floods and droughts have increased in frequency over\nthe past three decades. Income in both the Zambian host communities and the refugee\nsettlements is reliant on subsistence farming, non-timber forest products and casual labor, often\npaid in food, making the beneficiaries increasingly vulnerable to climate change resulting in crop\nfailures. This again leaves fewer resources to deal with other climate change-induced impacts\nlike worse water safety, lack of reliability of energy resources, and human and animal health\nissues. [33]\n\n\n18. The resettlement schemes also include a significant proportion of vulnerable families.\nThe first families to move as part of the local integration process were vulnerable former\n\n\n27 Zambia Central Statistical Office, 2010, _Census of Population and Housing_\n28 World Bank, 2015, _Mapping Subnational Poverty in Zambia_, p. 27-29; World Bank, 2015. 6th _edition, Zambia_\n_Economic Brief_ indicates that the national poverty rate in Zambia is 62 percent, p. 1.\n29 Zambia Central Statistics Office, 2011, _Living Conditions Monitoring Survey 2006 and 2010,_ p. 249\n30 Oxford Policy Management, 2014, _Baseline Study and Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Phase II of the_\n_PPCR_ : 26 percent reported moderate hunger in the Barotse sub-basin where Kaoma is, whereas the figure was 7\npercent in the Kafue sub-basin where Solwezi is. In both regions less than 1 percent stated they had severe hunger,\np. 70\n31 788 Angolans out of 12715 residing in Meheba and Mayukwayukwa. There are an additional 5890 self-settled\nAngolans and 56 Angolans registered in Lusaka. (UNHCR, 2015)\n32 Examples of vulnerability criteria include: separated child, exposure to multiple displacements, physical\ndisability, older person unable to care for self, and single female household representative. UNHCR Angolan and\nRwandan Refugee Profile as of November 6, 2015, (UNHCR, 2015), p. 1,2\n33 World Bank, 2013, _PAD - Zambia Strengthening Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase II)_, p. 1\n\n\n42\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6418530344963074,
+ "start": 94,
+ "end": 95
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.7635285258293152,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "former refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.650046169757843,
+ "start": 35,
+ "end": 37
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "study on vulnerability in Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.6442230939865112,
+ "start": 200,
+ "end": 205
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee settlements",
+ "confidence": 0.7502219080924988,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.9894794821739197,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.9789429306983948,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "female-headed households",
+ "confidence": 0.684619128704071,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 165
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "UNHCR Angolan and\nRwandan Refugee Profile",
+ "confidence": 0.5901594758033752,
+ "start": 661,
+ "end": 667
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.8234303593635559,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 626
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7393628358840942,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 628
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "November 6, 2015",
+ "confidence": 0.6681699156761169,
+ "start": 669,
+ "end": 673
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "refugees. [34] Zambians moving to resettlement schemes also tend to be vulnerable, as the\neligibility criteria for access to land in the resettlement schemes prioritize the (a) unemployed,\n(b) physically challenged vulnerable groups, (c) temporary workers, and (d) retired, in addition\nto local residents. [35] There is a need for support mindful of the challenges for the different groups\nin order for them to become self-reliant. Historically there have been challenges for women in\nowning land in the schemes and accessing support. [36] Other resettlement schemes have seen\nchallenges in supporting the vulnerable and extremely poor, for example agriculture input\nsupport has been contingent on membership of cooperatives, which has been an obstacle for\npoorer settlers who have been unable to pay membership fees. [37]\n\n\n**C.** **Project Activities**\n\n\n19. Key design principles for the Project include: (a) ensuring equity of project benefits\nbetween the former refugee settlements and the local populations living in communities, villages,\nwards and districts surrounding the settlements; (b) promoting integration and positive\ninteraction between the former refugees and local populations; (c) promoting more consistent\nplanning processes for the development of the resettlement area and hosting and neighboring\ndistricts; (d) supporting wider poverty alleviation and development processes in the local\ndistricts; and (e) supporting social cohesion.\n\n\n20. To operationalize these principles, the Project will use a Community-Driven\nDevelopment (CDD) approach, drawing on successful experiences of past and on-going\ncommunity-based and -driven programs in Zambia [38] and globally (particularly in post conflict\nand fragile settings [39] ). As an approach to local development that gives control over planning\ndecisions and investment resources to community groups and/or local governments, experience\nwith CDD models globally has demonstrated that communities, with appropriate support, can\neffectively and efficiently identify and address their local development needs. A meta-analysis of\nimpact evaluations found that CDD programs across regions have contributed to enhancing\naccess to and use of basic services (such as health, education, and water), and to improving\nhousehold living standards and welfare, with a strong poverty focus. [40]\n\n\n21. The Project will also assign specific roles and responsibilities to district and provincial\nauthorities, seeking to strengthen their capacity and leverage the integration of the resettlement\n\n\n34 World Bank and UN, 2015, _Zambia: Recommendations for Improved Local Integration of Former Refugees_, p. 20\n_35_ Zambia Department of Resettlement, (year unknown), _Basic Information about Land Resettlement Steller_\n_Selection Criteria_, flyer p 5-6\n36 M. Roth and S.G. Smith (Eds), 1995 _, Settlement Programs_ . In Land Tenure, Land Markets, and Institutional\nTransformation in Zambia, University of Wisconsin Madison, p. 193\n37 Phiri, Steven, 2009, _The Impact of Differentiated Land Allocation: The Case of Voluntary Land Resettlement in_\n_Copper belt Province, Zambia_, p. 29\n38 For example, lessons learned are drawn from the Zambia Social Investment Fund Project (ZAMSIF – P063584);\nthe Zambia Pilot Program on Climate Resilience (PPCR Phase I); and the Zambia: Strengthening Climate Resilience\n(PPCR Phase II – P127254).\n39 Stock-take studies include: World Bank, 2013, “ _Designing Community-Driven Development Operations in_\n_Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations. Lessons from a Stocktaking”,_ and; Barron, 2010. W _DR Background Paper_\n_“CDD in Post-Conflict and Conflict-Affected Areas”._\n40 Wong, Susan, World Bank, 2012, _What have been the impacts of World Bank Community-Driven Development_\n_Programs?_\n\n\n43\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "areas and host communities into their broader and longer-term development plans. CDD-type of\nprograms that embed participatory planning, cooperation with local authorities, and community\ncontrol of funds, are recognized to be able to enhance state-society relations, increase citizen\ntrust in institutions, and contribute to longer-term institution building, even before physical\nprojects are completed. [41] The participatory approach of the Project, where all members will need\nto work together for shared benefits, can also promote open communications and collective\nactions amongst former refugees and host community members, and hence contribute to a\nstronger sense of ownership and social cohesion.\n\n\n**Component 1: Socio-Economic Investments (US$ 15,000,000)**\n\n\n22. This component will support: (a) the connection of the resettlement areas with the\nsurrounding wards/districts; and (b) the local development of the resettlement areas and\nsurrounding host communities. Sub-projects can be carried out either by the National Climate\nChange Secretariat or by the District, Ward or Community, depending on the level of complexity\nand amount of the sub-project. Component 1 will be coordinated through two provincial level\nteams, located in Mongu (Western Province) and Solwezi (Northwestern Province) respectively,\nled by the Provincial Chief Planners. The NCCS will be responsible for major studies and\ntechnical assistance. Given the remoteness of the two areas of intervention and logistical\ndifficulties of managing the project from the national Secretariat, the project would assist the\nWestern and Northwestern Provinces and the target districts with support including costs to\noversee field operations, as well as capacity building and technical assistance to ward and district\nplanning authorities. The Component will be implemented through the following subcomponents:\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1 (a): Connective infrastructures sub-projects_\n\n\n23. Subcomponent 1.a. focuses on larger infrastructure designed to connect the resettlement\nareas with the surrounding wards/districts. Given the remoteness of the two resettlement areas,\nthere was a strong demand for connective infrastructures from key stakeholders for a stronger\nconnection with opportunities and services available in the hosting and neighboring\nwards/districts.\n\n\n24. Given the urgency of reinforcing the connection of the resettlement areas with\nsurrounding wards/districts, priority connective infrastructures will be identified through a\nsimplified participatory process that will inform the update/revision of the District Strategic\nDevelopment Plans.\n\n\n25. The simplified participatory process will be facilitated by NGOs subcontracted by the\nProvincial Project Implementation Unit (PPIU) and will include, among others: (a) the District\nPlanning and Advisory Sub-Committee (DPSC), (b) Ward Development Committees, (c) Chiefs\nand Traditional Affairs Officer, (d) Traditional leaders from the wards surrounding the\nresettlement areas, (e) Civil society representatives, including representatives of former refugees,\nrepresentatives of vulnerable groups within the resettlement and in the surrounding wards, and\n(f) representatives of the Commission for Refugees and the Department for Resettlement.\n\n\n41 World Development Report, 2011. _Conflict, Security, and Development_\n\n\n44\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.1. Eligibility Criteria for Connective Infrastructures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Summary|Eligibility Criteria|\n|---|---|\n|Contributes to local development|The sub-project must demonstrate clearly how it contributes to economic
and social development, and ultimately to self-reliance of beneficiaries.|\n|Shared benefits|The sub-project must demonstrate clearly that it will benefit both former
refugees and Zambians (for connective infrastructure).|\n|Vulnerable groups benefits|The most vulnerable groups and/or households must benefit from the sub-
project.|\n|No increased vulnerability to
climate change|The sub-project must demonstrate that it does not increase vulnerability to
climate change in the short, medium, and long term. Preference will be
given to sub-projects that help foster resilience to climate change.|\n|Sustainability|The district must guarantee that funds have been budgeted to ensure
maintenance and, if relevant, staffing, to ensure the adequate maintenance
and sustainability of investment to be funded.|\n|No significant negative social or
environmental impacts|The proposed sub-project must be screened for potential social and
environmental impacts, as per safeguards requirement, and be found
Category B or C (all Category A sub-projects are ineligible).|\n|Implementers are accountable|The proposing institution should meet minimum fiduciary and registration
criteria.|\n|Feasibility|Projects must be simple enough for the proposing institution to manage,
and maintain after completion.|\n|Demand driven|The sub-project must be demand driven.|\n|Mainstreamed|The sub-project is identified as a priority in the process of participatory
planning described in the Project Implementation Manual – When District
Strategic Development Plans have been revised, the sub-project must be
consistent with the District Strategic Development Plan.|\n|No other funds available|There are no other available sources to finance the proposed sub-project.|\n\n\n\n26. Based on priorities identified, the relevant authority (district or province) will prepare\nproposals, in compliance with the above summarized eligibility criteria. Proposals will then be\nsubmitted for review by the Provincial Planning Sub-committee, and/or the Provincial PIU. To\nensure coordination and involvement of the Department of Resettlement in the process, the\nPrincipal Land and Resettlement Officer will be coopted into the Provincial Planning SubCommittee, and the Resettlement Scheme Manager will be part of the District Planning and\nAdvisory Sub-Committee. Once reviewed and endorsed at Provincial level, proposals will be\nsent to the NCCS at national level for review, including review of safeguards compliance\n(detailed steps for screening, environmental assessments, and Environmental and Social\nManagement Plans are provided in the ESMF).\n\n\n**Table 2.2. Example of Potential District Level Connective Investments**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Type of Sub-grant|Connectivity Impact|Example of Sub-project|\n|---|---|---|\n|Connective Infrastructure Sub-
Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to nearby Ward|Road rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Sub-
Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to market opportunities|Road rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Sub-
Grant|Connection of the resettlement
scheme to nearby market|Bridge rehabilitation|\n|Connective Infrastructure Sub-
Grant|Connection to electricity|Provision of solar panels|\n\n\n45\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "27. It is expected that given the amount and complexity of connective infrastructures, the\nmanagement of the sub-grants will be too complex for districts. Depending on the amount and\ntype of sub-projects, alternate institutions might be identified to receive and manage the funds,\nincluding the province or national level institutions relevant to the identified infrastructure (for\nexample the Zambian Roads Development Agency for road rehabilitation sub-projects). The\nfunds will be provided in tranches, including an advance, and intermediary payment, and a final\npayment upon satisfactory completion, as assessed by relevant technical staff with the provision\nthat any subsequent support be conditional upon satisfactory performance\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1(b): Socio-economic investment sub-projects_\n\n\n28. Socio-economic investment sub-grants will be provided at three levels, namely, district,\nward, and community level.\n\n\n29. **Sub-projects amounts.** Sub-project amounts will be finalized in the PIM, and approved\nby the World Bank, based on: (a) estimated average costs for potential typical investments; (b) a\nplan of covering all the wards surrounding the ward hosting the resettlement areas, up to 4\npriority communities to be selected within each target ward; (c) the total number of target\ndistricts covering the target wards for the project, depending on how Kaoma and Solwezi\ndistricts are split; and (d) an assumption that sub-grants disbursement will happen during 4 of the\n5 years of the Project.\n\n - _District-level grants_, including a top up for the District(s) hosting the resettlement\nareas, specifically earmarked for use in the resettlement area;\n\n - _Ward level grants,_ including a top for the Ward(s) hosting the resettlement areas\nspecifically earmarked for use in the resettlement areas; and\n\n - _Community level grants,_ with specific resources targeted for communities in the\nresettlement areas.\n\n\n**Table 2.3. Examples of Potential District, Ward, and Community Level Sub-Projects**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Type of Sub-
project|Socio-Development
Impact|Example of Sub-project|\n|---|---|---|\n|District/Ward
Level|Increased access to social
services|
Construction or rehabilitation of school
Construction or rehabilitation of clinic
Construction of city center to attract private services
(bank, postal services, etc)
Provision of solar panels for social services
infrastructures
|\n|District/Ward
Level|Increased economic
opportunities|
Construction or rehabilitation of market
Construction of training center
Facilitation of links to micro-finance institutions
Rehabilitation of canals
Construction or rehabilitation of wells and boreholes
|\n|Community|Increased access to social
services|
Support to community school (solar panels, training
for teachers, rehabilitation, construction, provision of
books)
Construction or rehabilitation of community hall|\n\n\n\n46\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "30. **Sub-project cycle.** To prevent elite capture, community beneficiaries would be identified\nfirst by local poverty and vulnerability assessments confirmed by the facilitating NGOs and PIU\nstaff according to the agreed upon criteria. To ensure adequate support to the most vulnerable,\nthe participatory process will be designed so as to ensure they are fully represented in the\ndiscussion. In addition, 50 percent of community-level sub-grants should be earmarked for the\nmost vulnerable beneficiaries (to be clarified in Project Implementation Manual). The subproject cycle will take the following steps, which are to be detailed in the PIM.\n\n\n**Figure 2.1. Subproject Cycle**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n31. **Flow of funds.** The sub-grants will be channeled directly to a bank account of each level\nof beneficiaries once proposals have been appraised and approved by district-level planning subcommittee (this step will be done at the provincial-level for district-level sub-grants). To be\napproved, proposals need to meet the requisite eligibility criteria as well as requirements for\nsafeguards, budget, technical feasibility, and operational and maintenance plans. For\ninfrastructure-type sub-projects, the funds will be provided in tranches based on satisfactory\ncompletion of agreed milestones, to be monitored and certified by District and Provincial\ntechnical staff.\n\n\n**Component 2: Support to Resilient Livelihoods (US$825,000)**\n\n\n47\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "32. Support to livelihoods will be supported through: (a) priority access to employment for\nlocal population, in the vicinity of the district connective infrastructure as well as socioeconomic infrastructures to be funded through the project; and (b) community-level livelihood\nsub-grants.\n\n\n33. **Works.** To contribute to livelihoods of local populations especially of the most\nvulnerable, for sub-projects that include contracting of construction companies, low skilled labor\nwill be required to largely come from local populations, including both men and women, former\nrefugees and Zambians, and prioritizing most vulnerable households, as per requirements to be\ndetailed in the PIM. The beneficiary targeting process will be transparent and inclusive with a\nstrong communication strategy and a set of objective selection criteria.\n\n\n34. **Community level livelihood sub-grants** will target up to 4 priority communities\nidentified in the targeted wards, with a specific focus on the resettlement areas. To help inform\ncommunities’ choices, a preliminary assessment of livelihood opportunities was conducted as\npart of a joint World Bank-UN consultancy conducted in preparation for this project. [42] In\naddition, a livelihoods opportunities studies will be conducted at the beginning of the Project, in\nthe two areas of targeted intervention to identify more precisely, key opportunities to support\nlivelihoods and to ensure communities choices are based on well informed strategies. Fifty\npercent of community level sub-grants should be earmarked for the most vulnerable beneficiaries\n(to be clarified in Project Implementation Manual). Potential sub-projects to be financed under\nthe component are expected to complement and multiply positive impacts of the socio-economic\ninfrastructures constructed under the Component 1, for example to support capacity building and\nsmall materials for vulnerable women’s groups to set up a kitchen garden near a market\nstructure, or to provide agribusiness training for a new farmers’ group who can benefit from a\nrehabilitated road to a bigger market.\n\n\n**Table 2.4. Examples of Community Livelihood Sub-projects**\n\n\n35. As for the other above mentioned sub-grants, these will be channeled directly to the\nbeneficiaries once they meet the requisite eligibility criteria. The funds will be provided in\ntranches, with the provision that any subsequent support be conditional upon satisfactory\nperformance.\n\n\n**Component 3: Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention (US$1,000,000)**\n\n\n36. The first way to promote social cohesion through the Project will be through the CDD\nprocess itself, ensuring: (a) full transparency of the process through which sub-grants are\nallocated; and (b) the design and implementation of a widespread and clear communication\n\n42 World Bank-UN, October 2015, _Zambia: Recommendations for Improved Local Integration of Former Refugees_\n\n\n48\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "strategy on the Project. In addition, the Project will include: (a) Sensitization sessions on\ncoexistence and conflict mitigation, during participatory discussions at community, ward, and\ndistrict levels; and (b) support to community integration activities including both Zambians and\nformer refugees (to be clarified in more detail in the PIM). The Project could also pilot an\ninitiative to provide incentive funds to districts/wards/communities which demonstrated\nsuccessful promotion of social cohesion and local integration, provided an overall sub-project\nimplementation proceeds in a satisfactory manner.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management (US$ 3,175,000** )\n\n37. This component will cover the cost for project management, implementation and\nsupervision of project activities, administration of procurement and financial management,\nmonitoring and evaluation, and safeguards compliance monitoring. This component will support\nboth the NCCS and Provincial level Project Implementation Units, respectively in the\nNorthwestern and Western Provinces. This component will also support the Commission for\nRefugees and the Department of Resettlement, who will contribute to the monitoring of project\nimplementation, as well as the monitoring of the overall local integration process being\nimplemented in Zambia. Finally, this component will cover costs associated with inter-regional\nlearning and knowledge exchange such as participation in the proposed regional forum and study\ntours.\n\n\n**D. Project Financing**\n\n\n38. **Lending Instrument.** The proposed lending instrument for Zambia is Investment Project\nFinancing (IPF). Financing of country-level activities will be enabled through a combination of\nregional and national IDA credits of US$20 million to the Government of Zambia, 50 percent of\nwhich will extend from national IDA and 50 percent from regional IDA funds.\n\n\n39. Total project costs and associated financing are presented in Table 3.5.\n\n\n**Table 2.5. Project Cost and Financing.**\n\n|Project Component|Amount (US$)|\n|---|---|\n|1: Socio-economic Investments|15,000,000|\n|2: Support to Resilient Livelihoods|825,000|\n|3: Social Cohesion and Conflict Prevention|1,000,000|\n|4: Project Management|3,175,000|\n|**Total IDA**|**20,000,000**|\n|Counterpart Contributions|1,115,000 (10%
contributions to
connective and socio-
economic infrastructure)|\n|**Total Project Costs**|**21,115,000**|\n\n\n\n40. Additionally, the Government will allocate funds for (i) maintenance and staffing in\nrelation to sub-projects, and (ii) gratuity for project staff.\n\n\n**E. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n49\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "41. The Project will be implemented by the NCCS in light of: (a) the confirmed need for\nclimate resilience programming; (b) Convening authority of the NCCS under the Ministry of\nFinance; (c) Cost-efficiency (the NCCS is already implementing a World Bank project – the\nZambia: Strengthening Climate Resilience (P127254), with an office in Lusaka, as well as a\ndecentralized PIU already established and functioning in the Western Province, that hosts one of\nthe two resettlement areas – Mayukwayukwa in Kaoma District; and (d) successful\nimplementation and strong fiduciary track record of the NCCS in implementing the Zambia:\nStrengthening Climate Resilience Project, mitigating fiduciary and implementation risks.\n\n\n42. The Ministry of Finance is responsible for the overall execution, coordination, and\nimplementation of the Project, and will implement the Project through the National Climate\nChange Secretariat.\n\n\n43. The NCCS will facilitate and coordinate the implementation of the project at district,\nward, and community level, through local level planning authorities. The Project will also be\nimplemented in close collaboration with the Commission for Refugees, under the MoHA, set out\nto progressively transfer responsibility for the local integration agenda to the Department of\nResettlement, under the Vice President. At the national level, coordination will be facilitated\nthrough the National Advisory Group for Local Integration, the national arm of the Solutions\nAlliance, including all key national and international partners involved in the local integration\nprocess. In addition, coordination between key Ministries and national institutions involved in\nthe local integration process will continue to take place through the Inter-Ministerial Steering\nCommittee on Local Integration. [43] These two groups are already in place, and will thus include\nthe NCCS.\n\n\n44. The Provincial Planning Sub Committees in the Western and Northwestern Provinces,\nwill be responsible to facilitate the overall coordination of the project in the province, and\nendorse sub projects for subsequent approval by the National Climate Change Secretariat.\n\n\n45. The District Planner, under the guidance of the District Advisory Sub Committee will\nresponsible for facilitating, coordinating, and monitoring the implementation of sub-projects at\nthe district, Ward and community level, and screening sub projects against the eligibility criteria\nand recommending them for consideration by the provincial planning subcommittee.\n\n\n46. The Commission for Refugees and the Department of Resettlement will be responsible\nfor the monitoring of project implementation, and monitoring of the overall local integration\nprocess being implemented.\n\n\n43 These two committees might not exist throughout project implementation. As long as they do exist, the NCCS\nshall be part of these two committees. If one or both committees ceases to exist, coordination will continue through\nregular meetings between the NCCS, the Commission for Refugees, and the Department for Resettlement.\n\n\n50\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Figure 2.2** **Project implementation**\n\n\n47. In Lusaka, the Project team will include the following functions:\n\n\n**Table 2.6. Project Implementation: Lusaka Staffing**\n\n|Col1|POSITION|Dedicated
exclusively to
the project|Supporting
also other
projects|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|National Coordinator||X|\n|2|Project Coordinator|X||\n|3|Participatory Adaptation and Local Integration Specialist||X|\n|4|M&E Specialist||X|\n|5|M&E Officer||X|\n|6|Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialist||X|\n|7|Financial Management Specialist||X|\n|8|Procurement Manager|X||\n|9|Project Accountant|X||\n|10|Communications Manager||X|\n|11|Administration Manager||X|\n\n\n\n48. In addition, Provincial Project Implementation Units will support project implementation\nrespectively in the Western and Northwestern Provinces, and will include the following\nfunctions:\n\n\n51\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.7: Project Implementation: Provincial Project Implementation Units Staffing**\n\n|Col1|POSITION|Dedicated
exclusively to
project
(Western
Province)|Dedicated
exclusively to
project
(Northwester
n Province)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Project Manager||X|\n|2|Infrastructure Engineer|X|X|\n|3|M&E Officer|X|X|\n|4|Safeguards and Cohesion Officer|X|X|\n|5|Accounts Assistant|X|X|\n|6|Assistant Administrative Officer||X|\n\n\n\n_Grievance Redress Mechanism_\n\n51. The Project will set up a grievance redress mechanism (GRM) to ensure community\nmembers or any stakeholders are able to raise their concerns regarding project-related activities,\nincluding the application of relevant social and environmental safeguards and mitigation\nmeasures. The GRM will build on both traditional conflict-resolution systems as well as project\nspecific entry points. Received grievances will be systematically recorded and addressed by focal\npersons at each level, and consolidated by the national PIU into a grievance database. During the\ninitial community-based participatory assessments (Component 1 and 2) and sensitization\nsessions (Component 3), the Project's GRM will be explained so that all stakeholders are aware\nand encouraged to report grievances. More detailed plans on the GRM will be explained in the\nPIM.\n\n\n_Sub-Projects Monitoring Arrangements_\n\n\n52. **Sub-project monitoring.** Monitoring arrangements will be put in place at different\nlevels: (a) Community level: community/ward level, sub-committees will routinely conduct\nparticipatory monitoring, and will submit a simple monitoring form to the District Planning SubCommittee (DPSC), (b) District-level: District Planning Sub-Committees, consisting of technical\nofficers from line ministries, will review the community monitoring forms and conduct periodic\nsite visits to verify subprojects progress, fiduciary and safeguards compliance; (c) Provincial\nlevel: the Provincial Planning Sub-Committee, as well as the Provincial Project Implementing\nUnit will review and consolidate the district-level reports, and will be responsible for tracking\nkey results indicators in each province; and (d) National level: The PCU monitoring and\nevaluation department and the Project Coordinator will be the focal persons for monitoring\nproject implementation (including through quarterly site visits), and for reporting progress and\nresults to other national-level stakeholders and the World Bank.\n\n\n52\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "53. **Third Party Monitoring.** The Project will apply third-party monitoring tools to ensure\nthe project’s various investments are technically, financially, socially, and environmentally\ncompliant. This will in particular be done through ongoing independent: (a) financial audits\n(independent audits); (b) technical audits (independent international firm or consultant); (c)\nongoing NGO and community monitoring of technical, social, and environmental compliance.\n\n\n_Financial Management_\n\n\n54. A financial management assessment of the NCCS was undertaken to evaluate the\nadequacy of the project arrangements in accordance with the Bank’s minimum requirements as\nper OP/BP 10.00. The assessment complied with the Financial Management Manual for World\nBank-Financed Investment Operations that became effective on March 1, 2010, as well as with\nAfrica Financial Management Assessment and Risk Rating Principles.\n\n\n55. The financial management assessment identified the following capacity constraints in the\nNCCS: (a) inadequate supervision by government’s controlling officers; (b) issues of\nunsupported vouchers; ; and (c) weak internal audit committee to follow up the\nrecommendations of both internal and external audit reports.\n\n\n56. Since the Financial Management assessment was completed, the NCCS implemented the\nfollowing mitigation measures: (a) completed the development of the budget tracking tool, (b)\ndeveloped and adopted a plan to embed the financial management of the NCCS into the project\nmodule of the IFMIS, (c) initiated and is in the process of completing the recruitment of an\ninternal auditor, and (d) engaged the office of the controller of internal audits and the Western\nProvince Provincial internal audit department to undertake internal audits of the Secretariat, the\nPIU, and all the sub-projects.\n\n\n57. The overall conclusion of the assessment is that despite the control environment issues\naffecting the country, as assessed by various diagnostic studies in Zambia, the implementing\nagency (NCCS) satisfies the minimum financial management requirements as stated in the\nBank’s OP/BP 10.00. The risk rating for the Project’s financial management arrangements has\ntherefore been assessed as _Moderate_ .\n\n\n_Financial Management Arrangements for the Project_\n\n\n58. **Staffing.** The NCCS has a Finance Department headed by a Financial Management\nSpecialist (FMS) who is assisted by three (03) Project Accountants. However, this staffing\narrangement is not adequate; therefore, it is recommended that the Project employs its own\ndedicated Project Accountant at the NCCS secretariat to be assisted by two Assistant Accounts,\none at each Provincial Project Implementation Unit.\n\n59. **Budgeting arrangements.** Budget preparation and monitoring will follow national\nprocedures. NCCS produces the budget using COSTAB, and includes sufficient details to allow\nfor regular and effective implementation of planned activities and use of funds. The Project will\nprepare Annual Work Plans and Budgets (AWPBs), which will be the basis for budget\npreparation. The approval process will follow government procedures and is expanded in\nNCCS’s Project Financial Procedures Manual.\n\n\n53\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8820735812187195,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 94
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "NCCS",
+ "confidence": 0.6089379787445068,
+ "start": 96,
+ "end": 97
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Africa Financial Management Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.7014062404632568,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7096593379974365,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "diagnostic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.9652288556098938,
+ "start": 349,
+ "end": 351
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Zambia",
+ "confidence": 0.9875741600990295,
+ "start": 352,
+ "end": 353
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "COSTAB",
+ "confidence": 0.8852248191833496,
+ "start": 504,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "NCCS",
+ "confidence": 0.7036750912666321,
+ "start": 463,
+ "end": 464
+ },
+ "producer": {
+ "text": "NCCS",
+ "confidence": 0.6104637980461121,
+ "start": 463,
+ "end": 464
+ },
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 63
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "60. **Internal Controls and Internal audit.** The existing Financial Management Regulations,\n2006, Operationalizing The Public Finance Act, 2004 (Act No. 15 of 2004) will be applicable to\nthe Project operations. The regulations identify and define responsibilities for the various officers\ninvolved in the accounting processes. The regulations include among others, control procedures\ngoverning expenditures and payments; imprest; accountable documents; safes; loss of public\nfunds and assets, and the audit of accounts by the Auditor General. These regulations and\nprocedures are considered adequate. The Project will also apply the procedures as stipulated in\nthe NCCS existing Financial Management Procedural Manual that was approved by the World\nBank. The Project will also use the NCCS internal audit function.\n\n\n_Accounting Arrangements_\n\n\n61. **Accounting System.** The Project will use NCCS accounting system, Pastel ERP, which\nis adequate. However, the project is in the process of migrating to the IFMIS project module.\n\n\n62. **Accounting basis.** The Project will use cash basis accounting, in line with International\nPublic Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS).\n\n\n_Financial Reporting_\n\n\n63. The project will produce:\n\n\n - **Unaudited Interim Financial Reports (IFRs)** : unaudited interim financial\nreports will be provided on a quarterly basis to manage and monitor the use of the funds.\nThe financial reports should at the minimum show a statement of sources and uses of\nfunds, with the uses of funds analyzed by component and by activities. The quarterly\nreports should be submitted to the IDA 45 days after the end of the quarter.\n\n - **Annual Financial Statements (audited)** : An external audit will be carried out\nannually by the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) who, as outlined in the Constitution\nof Zambia Act 1996, is responsible for the audit of all Government funds, though in\npractice, because of capacity constraints, the OAG frequently appoints private sector\nauditors acceptable to the Bank to carry out the audit on behalf of the AG. The auditor\nwill conduct the audit according to International Standards on Auditing (ISA and Terms\nof Reference (TORs) acceptable to the Bank. The auditor will express an opinion on the\nfinancial statements accounting to the Bank’s audit policy. IDA requires that audited\nfinancial statements for the project be submitted no later than six months after the end of\nthe year.\n\n64. Beside the audit opinion, the auditor will be required to prepare a separate report to\nManagement, giving significant weaknesses that the auditor came across during the course of the\naudit that are not reflected in the audit opinion. These may include weaknesses in the internal\ncontrol systems, inappropriate accounting policies and practices, issues regarding general\ncompliance with broad covenants and any other matters the auditor considers should be brought\nto the attention of the borrower, and providing recommendations for improvements. Like the\naudit report, the Management Letter should be submitted to IDA within six months after the year\nend.\n\n\n54\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 64
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "65. The audit arrangements should be based on the “Guidelines – Annual Financial Reporting\nand Auditing of World Bank-Financed Activities” issued by the World Bank on June 30, 2003.\n\n\n_Funds Flow and Disbursement Arrangements_\n\n\n66. **Flow of funds arrangements.** The Project will use a system under which funds will flow\nfrom the World Bank to a Designated Account (DA) or a Holding Account, denominated in\nUnited States Dollars at the Bank of Zambia, to be operated by the NCCS. Funds from the World\nBank will be transferred to the Designated Accounts at the Bank of Zambia. At the time of\nproject execution, the Ministry of Finance on behalf of the Project will transfer funds from the\nDesignated Account to a project operational account held at the Bank of Zambia, through\nControl 99 (a treasury account) and managed by the NCCS. A funding slip is then issued to the\nproject showing that the Kwacha equivalent has been transferred. From the Project’s operational\naccount, all payments will be made through a mirror account (zero balance) held at a commercial\nbank. The mirror account will be used to make payments for goods, services and incremental\noperating costs pre-agreed with the Project in an annual work plan. The Project will also open\nand operate project operational accounts at both Provincial Project Implementation Units.\n\n\n67. **Banking arrangements.** The Project will be required to open a DA denominated in\nUnited States Dollars and a project’s operational account in Zambian Kwacha, both at Bank of\nZambia. A third account, a mirror account for transactional purposes, will be opened at a\ncommercial bank acceptable to IDA. Details of these accounts once opened and the signatories\nare to be submitted to the Bank.\n\n\n68. **Disbursement arrangements.** The Project will use the transaction-based method of\ndisbursements (Statements of Expenditure – SOEs). Other methods of disbursing to the Project\nwill include reimbursements, direct payment, and use of special commitments (for example,\nletters of credit). Further disbursement details will be provided in the disbursement letter.\n\n\n55\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 65
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Figure 2. 3 Flow of funds**\n\n\n69. The Project may use any of the following methods to disburse the grant proceeds: (a)\nadvance method; (b) direct payment to a third party; (c) special commitment to pay amounts to a\nthird party in respect of expenditure to be financed out of the grant proceeds, upon the request\nand under terms and conditions in finance agreement; and (d) reimbursement procedure where\nthe World Bank would reimburse the expenditures eligible for financing that the implementing\nagency has pre-financed from its own resources.\n\n\n70. Transaction disbursement documentation will be followed during the project\nimplementation. Under the transaction-based procedure, the required supporting documentation\nwill be summary reports, records and the SOEs. All SOEs supporting documentation will be kept\nby the implementing agency. They shall be available for review by Bank supervision missions\nand internal and external auditors. The agencies shall be encouraged to register the project in the\nBank Client Connection to facilitate processing of withdrawal requests.\n\n\n56\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 66
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "71. The Credit will disburse 100 percent of eligible expenditures (inclusive of taxes). The\nproceeds of the loan have been allocated as follows:\n\n\n**Table 2.8. Loan Proceeds Allotment**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Category|Amount of the
Grant/Credit Allocated
(expressed in SDR)|Percentage of
Expenditures to be
Financed|\n|---|---|---|\n|(1) Sub-grants|4,500,000
|
100%|\n|(2) Goods, Works, Non-
consulting services, and
Consultants’ Services required
for Sub-Projects under
Components 1 and 2 of the
Project|4,250,000|
100%|\n|(3) Goods, Works, Non-
consulting services,
Consultant’s Services, Training
and Operating Costs required
under the Project|5,450,000|
100%|\n|**Total Amount**|**14,200,000**|
100%|\n\n\n72. **Supervision plan.** Financial management supervision will be carried by IDA as part of\nthe overall supervision for the Project. At least two supervision missions are expected a year.\nThe objective of the financial management supervision is to ensure that the continued adequacy\nof the project’s FMS compliance with relevant legal covenants of the Financing Agreement, and\nthat the proceeds of the Grant are used only for the purposes for which the Grant was intended,\nwith due regard to economy and efficiency and also to build the financial management capacity\nof the borrower implementing agency. The actual work will include the checking of the UIFRs\nand the Audit Reports/Management Letters from the external auditors and following up with the\nproject secretariat on all significant accountability related issues.\n\n\n_Retroactive Financing_\n\n\n73. Project activities costing a total amount of up to US$500,000 are eligible for retroactive\nfinancing. Retroactive financing will cover Consultant’s Services, Goods, and Works, under\ncategory 2 of disbursement. Retroactive Financing will apply to payments made by the Borrower\nfrom April 1, 2016.\n\n\n_Procurement_\n\n\n74. A Procurement Risk Assessment (P-RAMS) of the Ministry of Finance (MoF) was\nundertaken on December 16, 2016 in accordance with the World Bank’s Procurement Risk\nManagement System. The Implementation Agency Procurement Risk for the Ministry of Finance\n(MoF) was assessed as _Moderate_ . Implementation of the risk mitigations actions would reduce it\nto Low.\n\n\n57\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 67
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "75. **Procurement Manual and Procurement Plan.** The procurement arrangements to be\nused under the Project, including packaging of procurement, maintaining clarity of\naccountability over procurement, record keeping, and frequency and scope of prior and post\nreview will be elaborated in the procurement module of the PIM (“the procurement manual”) and\nin the procurement plans. There is an existing procurement plan for the _Zambia: Strengthening_\n_Climate Resilience Project_ . This procurement manual will be amended to include a section on\nthe specific requirements for the _GLR: Displaced Persons and Border Communities Project_ . The\nProcurement Manual will address the needs of the various implementation agencies, including\nthe needs and procedures for procurement at community level. The Manual will outline the\nidentified risks and provide risk mitigation actions. It will cover the legal and regulatory\nframework, roles and responsibilities of the institutions and staff involved in procurement,\ninternal and external controls and quality assurance checks or systems, approval systems and\naccountability, and contracts register. It will spell out the roles and responsibilities of various\nplayers in contract management, based on both government regulations and as required for prior\nreview of IDA contracts.\n\n\n76. **Procurement decentralization.** Procurement decentralization affects since January 1,\n2013, all procuring entities. This means that the Zambia Public Procurement Agency (ZPPA) has\nnot been involved in reviewing bidding documents and bid evaluation and review and approval\nor not of contract award recommendations. All procurement activities will be carried out\ninternally by the MoF using its own institutional arrangements, controls and quality checks.\nSince January 2013, the ZPPA has been transformed into a regulatory and oversight body for\npublic procurement in Zambia.\n\n\n77. **Procurement risk mitigation measures.** Based on the P-RAMS, the main risks and\nproposed risk mitigation measures are shown in table 2.9:\n\n\n58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 68
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.9. Summary Procurement Assessment of Capacity, Risk, and Mitigation - Action Plan for Ministry of Finance**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Risks|Mitigation Measures|Action by
Undertake
n by|By When|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Procurement manual:** Procurement Decision
making is not fully covered in the Manual of
the Agency and the Procurement manual is
not readily available/known by staff, and will
require to be updated in include provisions for
the
_Displaced_
_Persons_
_and_
_Border_
_Communities project_|Ensure the procurement decision
making is fully covered in the
Manual of the Agency and is
available/known to staff
|NCCS|August 31
2016|\n|**Evaluations and awards of contracts:**
Reports do not always contain all essential
information necessary for approvals, including
adequate justification for decisions taken
during evaluation such as rejection of bids
Wrong award decision may be made because
of inadequate information, and due diligence
is not routinely carried out|Quality of evaluations and awards
of contracts requires enhancing.
Staff to be trained in good
evaluation practices which base
decisions on pre-disclosed criteria
and
includes
due
diligence
verifications
of
bidders
recommended
for
award
of
contract|NCCS|Starting
from
project
effectivene
ss|\n|**Inadequate**
**participation**
**by**
**technical**
**experts** in bid preparation and evaluation
leading to potential / inadequate bidding
process and contract awards|Improve
procurement
implementation
capacity
by
acquiring
the
necessary
procurement expertise.
Involve technical staff and users in
preparation of specifications or
agree to hire competent consultants
to draft technical specifications and
terms of reference and during
evaluation of bids and proposals.
|MoF /
NCCS|Starting
from
project
effectivene
ss|\n|**Procurement**
**staff**
**capacity**
may
be
inadequate due to increased work load that
will result from the implementation of the|Improve
procurement
implementation
capacity
by
acquiring
the
necessary
procurement
expertise
(recruit
procurement officer in the Lusaka
office
specifically
for
the
upcoming project)
|MoF /
NCCS|By project
effectivene
ss|\n\n\n\n78. **Procurement Post Reviews (PPRs) and Independent Post Reviews (IPRs) by the**\n**World Bank.** Based on the assessed agency implementation risk for procurement, which is\n_Moderate_, the World Bank will carry out PPRs or IPRs for all contracts that will based on the\nprocurement plan not having been subject of prior review by the World Bank using a sample of\n10 percent. Based on continuing assessment of risk and the success of risk mitigation measures\nimplemented, the sample size will be reduced as risk mitigation measures are successfully\nimplemented. [44] The review thresholds are shown in table 2.10 below.\n\n\n44 High Risk projects focus on a sample size of 20 percent; Substantial risk, a sample size of 15 percent, Moderate\nrisk 10 percent, and Low risk 5 percent. Changes in risk levels will be communicated to the MoF as outcomes of the\n\n\n59\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 69
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.10. Prior Review and Procurement Method Thresholds** _[45]_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Expenditure
Category|Procurement Method|Contract Value Threshold
for Use of Method (US$)|Contracts Subject to Prior
Review (US$)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Works|ICB(Works/Supply and
Installation)|>= 10,000,000|All contracts|\n|Works|NCB|>= 200,000 - < 10,000,000|As in procurement plan|\n|Works|Force Account|All values|All contracts|\n|Works|Shopping|< 200,000|None|\n|Works|Community Participation in
Procurement (CDD)|All values|None|\n|Works|Direct Contracting|All values|All contracts|\n|Goods|ICB|>= 2,000,000|All contracts|\n|Goods|NCB|>= 100,000 < 2,000,000|As in procurement plan|\n|Goods|Shopping|< 300,000 (motor vehicles
only)|None|\n|Goods|Shopping|< 100,000 000 (rest not
motor vehicles)|None|\n|Goods|Community Participation in
Procurement (CDD)|All values|None|\n|Goods|Direct Contracting|All values|All contracts|\n||Procurement from UN
agencies|All values|None|\n\n\n79. **Procurement Plan.** The NCCS, Ministry of Finance, with the support of the World\nBank, has developed a procurement plan for the first 18 months of Project implementation. The\nWorld Bank reviewed and approved this plan on April 1, 2016. The procurement plan includes\nall the procurement packages identified for the first 18 months of Project implementation. The\nProcurement Plan will be updated as required at least once a year throughout the life of the\nProject.\n\n\n80. **Procurement methods** _._ Particular methods of procurement of goods and works are as\nfollows:\n\n\n(a) International Competitive Bidding. Except as otherwise provided, goods and works\n\nshall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive\nBidding (ICB).\n(b) Other methods of procurement of goods and works. The following list specifies the\n\nmethods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding which may be\nused for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances\nunder which such methods may be used:\n\n(i) National Competitive Bidding\n(ii) Force Account\n(iii) Procurement from UN agencies\n(iv) Shopping\n\n\nPPR / IPR exercise, which also result in the revisions of the prior review and National Competitive Bidding\nthresholds.\n45 Contracts with a cost estimate below US$300,000 for motor vehicles only may be procured on basis of shopping\nprocurement method.\n\n\n60\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 70
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "(v) Direct Contracting\n(vi) Community Participation in Procurement (CDD).\n\n81. Additional Provisions for National Competitive Bidding: The following provisions shall\napply to the procurement of goods and works under National Competitive Bidding procedures:\nThe procurement procedure to be followed for National Competitive Bidding (“NCB”) shall be\nthe open bidding procedure set forth in the Public Procurement Act, 2008, Act. No.12 of 2008, as\namended by the Public Procurement (Amendment) Act, 2011, Act No. 15 of 2011 (the “PPA”),\nand the Public Procurement Regulations, 2011, Statutory Instrument No. 63 of 2011 (the\n“Regulations”); provided, however, that such procedure shall be subject to the provisions of\nSection I and Paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 of Section III, and Appendix 1 of the “Guidelines for\nProcurement of Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and IDA\nCredits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers” (January 2011) (the “Procurement Guidelines”),\nand the additional provisions in the following paragraphs:\n\n(a) Eligibility: Eligibility to participate in a procurement process and to be awarded\nan Association-financed contract shall be as defined under Section I of the Procurement\nGuidelines; accordingly, no bidder or potential bidder shall be declared ineligible for\ncontracts financed by the Association for reasons other than those provided in Section I\nof the Procurement Guidelines. No restriction based on nationality of bidders and/or\norigin of goods shall apply, and foreign bidders shall be allowed to participate in NCB\nwithout application of restrictive conditions, such as, but not limited to, mandatory\npartnering or subcontracting with national entities.\n(b) Domestic Preference: No margins of preference of any sort shall be applied in the\nbid evaluation.\n(c) Bidding Documents: Procuring entities shall use bidding documents acceptable to\nthe Association.\n(d) Bid validity: An extension of bid validity, if justified by exceptional\ncircumstances, may be requested in accordance with Appendix 1 of the Procurement\nGuidelines. A corresponding extension of any bid guarantee shall be required in all cases\nof extension of bid validity. A bidder may refuse a request for extension of bid validity\nwithout forfeiting its bid guarantee.\n(e) Qualification: Qualification criteria shall be clearly specified in the bidding\ndocuments. All criteria so specified, and only such specified criteria, shall be used to\ndetermine whether a bidder is qualified. Qualification shall be assessed on a “pass or fail”\nbasis, and merit points shall not be used. Such assessment shall be based entirely upon\nthe bidder’s or prospective bidder’s capability and resources to effectively perform the\ncontract, taking into account objective and measurable factors, including: (i) relevant\ngeneral and specific experience, and satisfactory past performance and successful\ncompletion of similar contracts over a given period; (ii) financial position; and where\nrelevant (iii) capability of construction and/or manufacturing facilities.\n(f) Prequalification procedures and documents acceptable to the Association shall be\nused for large, complex and/or specialized works. Verification of the information upon\nwhich a bidder was prequalified, including current commitments, shall be carried out at\nthe time of contract award, along with the bidder’s capability with respect to personnel\nand equipment. Where pre-qualification is not used, the qualification of the bidder who is\n\n\n61\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 71
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "recommended for award of contract shall be assessed by post-qualification, applying the\nqualification criteria stated in the bidding documents.\n(g) Bid Evaluation: All bid evaluation criteria other than price shall be quantifiable in\nmonetary terms. Merit points shall not be used, and no minimum point or percentage\nvalue shall be assigned to the evaluation criteria or significance of price in bid evaluation.\nNo negotiations shall be permitted.\n(h) Guarantees: Guarantees shall be in the format, shall have the period of validity\nand shall be submitted when and as specified in the bidding documents.\n(i) Cost Estimates: Detailed cost estimates shall be confidential and shall not be\ndisclosed to prospective bidders. No bids shall be rejected on the basis of comparison\nwith the cost estimates without the Association’s prior written concurrence.\n(j) Rejection of bids and re-bidding: No bid shall be rejected solely because it falls\noutside of a predetermined price range or exceeds the estimated cost. All bids (or the sole\nbid if only one bid is received) shall not be rejected, the procurement process shall not be\ncancelled, and new bids shall not be solicited without the Association’s prior written\nconcurrence.\n(k) Fraud and corruption: In accordance with the Procurement Guidelines, each\nbidding document and contract shall include provisions stating the Association’s policy\nto sanction firms or individuals found to have engaged in fraud and corruption as set forth\nin the Procurement Guidelines.\n(l) Inspection and audit rights: In accordance with the Procurement Guidelines, each\nbidding document and contract shall include provisions stating the World Bank’s policy\nwith respect to inspection and audit of accounts, records and other documents relating to\nthe submission of bids and contract performance.\n\n82. Particular methods of procurement for consulting services are:\nQuality and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS). Except as otherwise provided in the\nparagraph below, consultants services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the\nbasis of Quality and Cost-Based Selection.\n(b) Other methods of procurement of consultants’ services. The following list specifies\n\nselection methods, other than Quality and Cost-Based Selection, which may be used\nfor consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under\nwhich such methods may be used:\n\n(i) Quality-Based Selection (QBS)\n(ii) Selection based on the Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)\n(iii) Least-Cost Selection (LCS)\n(iv) Single-Source Selection for firms (SSS)\n(v) Individual Consultants (IC)\n(vi) Single-Source Selection for IC (SSS).\n\n\n62\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 72
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.11: Prior Review Threshold: Consultants**\n\n|Col1|Selection Method|Prior Review Threshold|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1.|QCBS and QBS|>, =$200,000|All except for engineering and
contract management only whose
threshold will be > =$300,000|\n|2.|FBS, QBS, LCS and CQS|<$200,000|As per procurement plan|\n|3.|Single Source (Firms)|N/A|All|\n|4.|Individual Consultants|> =$100,000|All|\n|5.|Individual Consultants|<$100,000|As per procurement plan|\n|6.|Single Source (Individual
Consultants)|N/A|All|\n|_Notes:_
QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (Section II of the Consultants’ Guidelines)
LCS = Least Cost Selection (Para 3.6, of the Guidelines)
CQS = Selection based on Consultants’ Qualifications (Para 3.7 of the Guidelines)
FBS= Fixed Budget Selection (Para 3.5 of the Guidelines)
QBS = Quality Based Selection (Para 3.2 of the Guidelines)|_Notes:_
QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (Section II of the Consultants’ Guidelines)
LCS = Least Cost Selection (Para 3.6, of the Guidelines)
CQS = Selection based on Consultants’ Qualifications (Para 3.7 of the Guidelines)
FBS= Fixed Budget Selection (Para 3.5 of the Guidelines)
QBS = Quality Based Selection (Para 3.2 of the Guidelines)|_Notes:_
QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (Section II of the Consultants’ Guidelines)
LCS = Least Cost Selection (Para 3.6, of the Guidelines)
CQS = Selection based on Consultants’ Qualifications (Para 3.7 of the Guidelines)
FBS= Fixed Budget Selection (Para 3.5 of the Guidelines)
QBS = Quality Based Selection (Para 3.2 of the Guidelines)|_Notes:_
QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (Section II of the Consultants’ Guidelines)
LCS = Least Cost Selection (Para 3.6, of the Guidelines)
CQS = Selection based on Consultants’ Qualifications (Para 3.7 of the Guidelines)
FBS= Fixed Budget Selection (Para 3.5 of the Guidelines)
QBS = Quality Based Selection (Para 3.2 of the Guidelines)|\n\n\n\n83. **Selection of Consulting Services** : Selection of consulting services under the project will\nbe carried out based on the provisions of the “Guidelines Selection and Employment of\nConsultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers dated\nJanuary 2011 revised July 2014” The consulting services that are likely to be needed under the\nproject include those for design, supervision, dispute resolution, the environmental assessments\nand safeguard study, and the financial, procurement, and technical audits. These contracting\nneeds will be identified and included in the procurement plan, and contractors will be selected on\nthe basis of methods that have been included in the approved procurement plan. These methods\nand their corresponding prior review limits are provided above in Table 2.11.\n\n84. **Short List Comprising Entirely National Consultants** . Shortlists of consultants for\nservices that are estimated to cost less than US$200,000 equivalent per contract may be\ncomprised entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of\nthe World Bank’s Consultant Guidelines. Engineering and Contract Management contracts with\ncost estimates of less than US$300,000 may be comprised entirely of national consultants in\naccordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines. The procurement\nplan will indicate which contracts using CQS may not have shortlists comprising entirely of\nnational firms.\n\n85. **Review of Terms of reference (TOR) by the Bank** . All consultancy contracts as well as\nall single source selections, irrespective of the contract value, will be subject to prior review by\nthe Bank.\n\n86. **Consultant Procurement Packages** . The procurement packages for consulting services\nthat will be subject to Bank prior and post review were provided in the project procurement plan\nthat was reviewed and approved during negotiations.\n\n\n63\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Prior Review Threshold",
+ "confidence": 0.843643069267273,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 10
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Quality- and Cost-Based Selection",
+ "confidence": 0.7838945984840393,
+ "start": 186,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "environmental assessments\nand safeguard study",
+ "confidence": 0.9693397283554077,
+ "start": 635,
+ "end": 640
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.8318389058113098,
+ "start": 610,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Consultant Guidelines",
+ "confidence": 0.7525463104248047,
+ "start": 757,
+ "end": 759
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.8365278840065002,
+ "start": 602,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "project procurement plan",
+ "confidence": 0.6179240345954895,
+ "start": 892,
+ "end": 895
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 73
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "87. **Training** . This category will cover all costs related to the carrying out of study tours,\ntraining courses and workshops, i.e., hiring of venues and related expenses, stationery, and\nresources required to deliver the workshops as well as costs associated with financing the\nparticipation of community organization in short courses, seminars, and conferences, including\nassociated per diem and travel costs. Training projects will be part of the Annual Work Plan and\nBudget and will be included in the procurement plan. Prior review of training plans, including\nproposed budget, agenda, participants, location of training, and other relevant details, will be\nrequired only on an annual basis.\n\n88. **Operating Costs.** Operating costs relate to the project implementation services to be\nprovided to the project. These will be procured using the Borrower's administrative procedures,\nacceptable to the World Bank. Lists of eligible expenditures applicable are spelt out in the\nFinancing Agreement and PIM. The PIM will elaborate the applicable administrative procedures\nthat will be followed and which will have been reviewed and found to be acceptable to the Bank.\n\n\n64\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 74
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex** **3: Economic and Financial Analysis**\n\n**GLR: Displaced Persons & Border Communities (P152821)**\n\n\n1. _Rationale for Public Financing_ . By supporting the integration of former refugees and the\ndevelopment of host communities, the project will contribute to the GoZ’s aim of fostering local\ndevelopment, increasing access to public services, and reducing the risk of regional instability.\nThe project will also contribute to build the capacity of local Government authorities in the\ntargeted areas of intervention.\n\n2. _World Bank value added._ The April 16, 2016 communique of the Development\nCommittee of the World Bank Group called on the World Bank to take action on forced\ndisplacement, in partnership with humanitarian and other actors, to mitigate the vulnerabilities of\nforcibly displaced persons, help host communities manage shocks, and tackle the root causes of\nforced displacement. In the recent years, the World Bank has built its capacity to provide a\ndisplacement response to forced displacement through cutting-edge analytical work and\ninnovative operations designed to address forced displacement. Keeping with its mandate and\nresponding to client demand, the World Bank has been providing support at the global, regional,\nsub-regional, and country levels. The World Bank is uniquely positioned, through its unique\ntechnical expertise and experience, as well as ability to foster cooperation among development\nand humanitarian partners, to support a development response to forced displacement.\n\n3. _Economic rate of return_ . Most of the sub-projects to be financed under Component 1 of\nthe Project (school building and rehabilitation, clinics, water provision, roads rehabilitation, etc.)\nhave proven their economic soundness in other countries and under other World Bank-financed\nprojects in Zambia. There is therefore an assumption of a positive economic rate of return for\nthose types of local sub-projects in this case. The financial and economic analysis undertaken for\nthe project looked rather at the additional dimension of delivering these sub-projects through a\ndevelopment approach, as compared to a humanitarian approach. According to the economic and\nfinancial analysis, delivery of such investments through a humanitarian approach brings few\nmultiplier effects on the local markets and insignificant job creation. By contrast, delivery of\nthose sub-projects through a development approach, delivered as part of mainstream government\ninstitutions brings additional benefits, as described in the tables below.\n\n2. In addition, investment in the local area for the construction of infrastructures will\ngenerate significant short term employment opportunities. The exact number of jobs created will\ndepend on the type of projects and the labor intensity used. With an assumed labor intensity as\nlow as 10%, about US$650,000 could be spent in wages. With a daily wage for unskilled labor\nequivalent to about US$2 [46] /day, this corresponds to about 325,000 days of work or more than\n3,600 short term (4 months) employment created.\n\n3. Under Component 2, the Project’s livelihoods activities are aimed at increasing\nproductivity for small-scale farmers by providing improved access to larger land plots,\n\n\n46 [http://www.africapay.org/tanzania/home/salary/minimum-wages -- The web site report a minimum wage of about 3,000-4,000 shilling a day](http://www.africapay.org/tanzania/home/salary/minimum-wages)\nfor unskilled labor in agriculture, services, domestic workers or commerce.\n\n\n65\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 75
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "diversified livelihoods and improved commercialization. The Project will increase opportunities\nfor low skilled labor and employment on works. It is estimated that road rehabilitation could\ncreate up to 60,000 days of work, with the potential to increase household income revenue by\n30%. An economic and financial analysis for a displacement project in DRC, revenues under the\nlivelihood components of that project correspond to about 35% to 57% of total annual household\nconsumption for the poorest.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|3.1 Benefits and challenges of improving access to water and electricity|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Increased accessibility to
potable water
Increased hygiene
Time saved (4-5 hours per
day per household)
Increased
opportunities
for
gardening
and
livestock
||Improving
capacity
to
deliver services
Multiplier effects on local
markets
More job creation
Cheaper school and health
care rehabilitation|Recurrent costs that affect
annual budget|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|3.2 Benefits and challenges of improving road rehabilitation|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Improve
transport
efficiency
Improved
transport
of
goods to markets
Increased
commercial
transactions
Reduction of time spent
on transport
Improved
market
accessibility
Price reductions|Environmental|Large scale investment
Longer-term maintenance|Maintenance costs|\n\n\n\n66\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 76
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|3.3 Benefits and challenges of improving health and education facilities|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Increased enrolment
Decreased dropout rates
Improved
quality
of
learning
Increased accessibility to
secondary schools
Time saving
Improved
teaching
conditions
Increased accessibility of
health facilities
Improved conditions in
health service provision
Improved conditions for
health staff
|Poor quality of service
Shortage
of
qualified
nurses and doctors
Shortage
of
qualified
teachers|Increased
human
development base
Higher health rates
Higher education rates|Maintenance costs|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|3.4 Benefits and challenges of improving livelihood activities|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Increased purchasing
power
Increased transactions on
non-food markets|Tensions between
community members over
inclusion in work|Sustainable livelihoods
Long term investments||\n\n\n\n|3.5 Benefits and challenges of investing in market places|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Access to markets
Access to products||Strengthening long term
economic viability||\n\n\n|3.7 Benefits and challenges of sustainable agriculture training|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Improved skills
Improved
economic
opportunities||Sustainable livelihoods||\n\n\n67\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 77
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|3.8 Benefits and challenges of diversification of agriculture and livestock production|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Support self-reliance
Strengthen resilience to
climate change
Support to agricultural
production||||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|3.9 Benefits and challenges of social cohesion and conflict prevention|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Increased awareness of
project activities and
benefits
Improved ability to
manage conflict
Strengthened sense of
community|Dealing with sensitive
conflicts and histories|Sustained skills for
conflict management||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|3.10 Benefits and challenges of Government implementation of activities|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Host and Refugee Population|Host and Refugee Population|Benefits of Development Response|Benefits of Development Response|\n|Positive|Negative|Positive|Negative|\n|Improved management
skills
Enhanced consultation
and buy-in||Enhanced contract
transparency
Improved supervision
Strengthened local
capacities|Recurring costs of
monitoring and evaluation
Long term management
skills required
Increase in recurring costs
for development activities
in Zambia|\n\n\n\n68\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 78
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 4: Implementation Support Plan**\n\n**GLR: Displaced Persons & Border Communities (P152821)**\n\n\n**A.** **Strategy and Approach**\n\n\n1. The strategy for the Implementation Support Plan (ISP) has been devised to undertake the\nongoing and necessary mitigation measures to address the following major risks identified in the\nSORT: (a) change in political will regarding local integration processes; (b) lack of institutional\ncapacity for project implementation and coordination; (c) fiduciary risks especially at local\ngovernment level; (d) deteriorating social cohesion between former refugees and local\npopulation. The design of the project itself contains mitigations against each of these risks. The\nISP is designed to review and ensure that those mitigation measures are effective and to reinforce\nthem where necessary. The ISP is also designed to enhance the capacity of the implementing\nagencies in a range of technical and specialized areas. The ISP will be undertaken by World\nBank staff and is based on four major principles: (a) continual high level dialogue with the\nGovernments of Zambia on policy and strategy concerning local integration; (b) frequent local\nlevel and field based supervision of project activities including consultation with beneficiaries;\n(c) consistent review of fiduciary procedures and controls within the implementing agencies; and\n(d) technical capacity building for all implementing agencies.\n\n\n2. The team will support in-country forum for policy dialogue, where the approach to local\nintegration is discussed and reviewed. In Zambia this forum is the existing National Advisory\nGroup for Local Integration. In this forum, donors, implementing agencies and stakeholders can\nreflect on constraints and opportunities for the local integration process, emerging evidence on\nthe benefits of local integration and will be able to pass reflections onto the inter-Ministerial\nLocal Integration Committees for any recommended action. The team will also endeavor to\nincrease regional political support for local integration as an acceptable and beneficial durable\nsolution to protracted displacement. This will be effected through the proposed new GL Regional\nforum, to be processed as the third part of the SOP. The team will respond to government\nrequests to learn from international best practice on responses for displaced persons and will\nfacilitate learning study tours to other countries (such as Uganda) and the sharing of international\nexperience.\n\n\n3. The Project will entail a number of small scale sub projects and contracts to be\nundertaken in remote and difficult to access locations. The number and diversity of contract\ntypes and the remoteness of the physical locations pose a challenge to implementation support.\nThe Project also has implications for social relations between former refugees and the local\npopulation, relations which can only be truly understood through field presence and consultation.\nThe design of the Project includes a number of built in features to mitigate these risks (third\nparty monitoring, ongoing financial and technical audits, beneficiary surveys). In addition, the\nISP will involve field visits to a high proportion of all the sub projects in order to verify the\nquality of sub-projects, the degree of beneficiary involvement in each one and the social and\neconomic impact for the recipients, and to ensure lessons learned from the field are adopted by\nthe project. The Bank team composition will prioritize the selection of team members with the\ncommitment and ability to conduct field based travel and who are skilled in undertaking\n\n\n69\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 79
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "participatory discussions with local populations. The team will also consult frequently with those\nwho will be able to give a local level view on issues such as the state of social cohesion and\nperceptions towards local integration; such informants will include UNHCR field staff, NGOs\noperating in the area, academics and researchers with local level contacts and local government\nofficials.\n\n\n4. A particular focus of field visits will be to verify that selected project investments have\nthe characteristics that justify their selection for investment according to the selection criteria for\nthe project. The Bank team will conduct due diligence on relevant documentation, data and field\nbased conditions to ensure compliance with the selection criteria. Divergence from the selection\ncriteria will be immediately discussed with the implementing agencies.\n\n\n5. The World Bank team will undertake regular and comprehensive fiduciary review and\nimplementation support for the implementing agencies. This will include: review of quarterly\nIFRs; review of the external audit; ongoing review of internal controls; review of the\nperformance of fiduciary staff; attention to and maintenance of procurement standards on all\ncontracts requiring prior review; an annual procurement post review of contracts.\n\n\n6. It is envisaged that the team will work to raise the technical capacity of the implementing\nagencies in the following areas: (a) ability to undertake participatory and consultative planning\nprocesses at the local level and to implement community-driven development; (b) ability to\nimplement and monitor social cohesion initiatives and impact; (c) ability to undertake local level\nprocurement and implementation of contracts; and (d) ability to supervise construction with\nattention to high technical standards.\n\n\n7. A constructive learning approach between the implementing agencies and the Bank in the\nISP will be achieved by the following: (a) use of project monitoring and evaluation systems as a\ntool to track results and also to contribute to performance based project management; and (b)\ncommitment to open discussion of project constraints and challenges with a view to finding\nsolutions, taken as an opportunity for learning and improvement.\n\n\n**B.** **Implementation Support Plan**\n\n\n8. The World Bank's implementation support team will include a regional Task Team\nLeader (TTL) based in Washington DC. The team will include country-based fiduciary,\nprocurement, safeguards staff and sector specialists.\n\n\n9. The ISP will make use of the following tools for review and technical capacity building:\n(a) regular implementation support missions at least twice a year including field visits; (b) a MidTerm Review, used as the opportunity to make major adjustments in project design and funding\nallocations, if needed; (c) use of monitoring and evaluation data for performance adjustment; and\n(d) seeking of trust fund resources to augment delivery of capacity building.\n\n\n70\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 80
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**C.** **Implementation Main Focus**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|10. The ta project:|able presents the main focus of the|implementation support over the life of the|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Time**|**Focus**
|**Skills Needed**|\n|First twelve
months|
Finalization of PCU at national and
PIUs local level
Opening of project accounts
Staff capacity assessment and
development of capacity building
plan
Capacity building of project staff
Agreement and implementation of
local integration governance
arrangements
Baseline data collection for
monitoring and evaluation plan.
Work plans for Components 1- 3
Communication and awareness
raising of project
Implementation of Component 1a
and 1b
Policy dialogue with government
Information sharing and coordination
with other donors/agencies
supporting NGOs
|TTL
Social Development/Gender/Community participation
Livelihood
Civil engineer
Financial Management
Procurement
Environment
Monitoring and Evaluation
Sector Specialists (depending on sub-project choices –
Water, Education, Health, Infrastructure)
|\n|12-48 months|
Implementation of all components’
activities
Community consultation and
inclusion
Capacity building of project staff
Technical quality control
Selection of investments according to
selection criteria
Collection of M&E data
Adherence to fiduciary procedures
Policy dialogue with government
Information sharing and coordination
with other donors/agencies
supporting NGOs
|As above
|\n|48 – 60
months|
Finalization of component activities
Collection of end-line M&E data
Final technical audit|As above|\n\n\n71\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Baseline data collection",
+ "confidence": 0.7490018606185913,
+ "start": 170,
+ "end": 173
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "project staff",
+ "confidence": 0.7627826929092407,
+ "start": 140,
+ "end": 142
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E data",
+ "confidence": 0.9925298094749451,
+ "start": 417,
+ "end": 421
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E data",
+ "confidence": 0.7866959571838379,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 511
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 81
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Skills Mix Required**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Skills Needed|Number of Staff
Weeks/Year|Number of Trips/Year|\n|---|---|---|\n|Regional TTL
Zambia co-TTL
Social Development Specialist
Civil Engineer
Procurement specialist
Financial Management Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Livelihoods Specialist
Sector Specialists
Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist
|4
12
10
10
6
6
10
10
10
2
|
Minimum 2
2
1
|\n\n\n\n72\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/465201467989464233/pdf/PAD1510-PAD-P152821-IDA-R2016-0078-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 82
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file