diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_115/raw/doc_115_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_115/raw/doc_115_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_115/raw/doc_115_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,6627 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "Document of\n# The World Bank\n\n\n**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY**\n\nReport No: PAD1678\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\n\nON\n\n\nPROPOSED CREDITS TO THE\n\n\nREPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 14.5 MILLION\n\n(US$20 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nFEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 71 MILLION\n\n(US$100 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nREPUBLIC OF UGANDA\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 35.5 MILLION\n\n(US$50 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nAND A PROPOSED GRANT TO THE\n\n\nINTERGOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ON DEVELOPMENT\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 3.6 MILLION\n\n(US$5 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nFOR THE\n\n\nDEVELOPMENT RESPONSE TO DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS PROJECT\n\nIN THE HORN OF AFRICA\n\n\nMay 4, 2016\n\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice\nAfrica Region\nMiddle East and North Africa Region\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the\nperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without\nWorld Bank authorization.\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n\n\nExchange Rate Effective February 29, 2016, for Djibouti and\n\nMarch 31, 2016, for IGAD, Ethiopia, and Uganda.\n\n\nCurrency Unit = Djibouti Francs (DJF), Ethiopian Birr\n\n(ETB), Ugandan Shillings (UGX)\nUS$1 = 178 DJF, 21.46 ETB, 3,370 UGX\nUS$1 = SDR 0.723948 for Djibouti; SDR 0.709814\n\n\n\nfor IGAD, Ethiopia, and Uganda\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJanuary 1 - December 31 (Djibouti)\n\n\n\nDecember 31 (Djibouti)\nJune 30 (Uganda, IGAD)\nJuly 7 (Ethiopia)\n\n\n\nJuly 1\nJuly 8\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS\n\n\n\nADDS _Agence Djiboutienne de_\n_Développement Social_ (Djiboutian\nSocial Development Agency)\nAGP Agricultural Growth Project\nARRA Administration for Refugee and\nReturnee Affairs\nBoFEC Bureau of Finance and Economic\nCooperation\nCAC Community Audit Committee\nCDD Community Driven Development\nCFO Chief Finance Officer\nCFT Community Facilitation Team\nCPEC _Caisse Populaire d’Epargne et de_\n_Crédit_ (Credit Union Savings and\nCredit)\nCIG Common Interest Groups\nCPC Community Procurement Committee\nCPMC Community Project Management\nCommittee\nDRDIP Development Response to\nDisplacement Impacts Project\nDTPC District Technical and Planning\nCommittee\nESMF Environmental and Social\nManagement Framework\nFM Financial Management\nFA Financing Agreement\nFAO Food and Agriculture Organization\n\n\n\nFPCU Federal Project Coordination Unit\nFSC Federal Steering Committee\nFTC Federal Technical Committee\nGDP Gross Domestic Product\nGRS Grievance Redress Service\nGTP Growth and Transformation Plan\nHOA Horn of Africa\nIBRD International Bank for Reconstruction\nand Development\nICGLR International Conference on the Great\nLakes Region\nICT Information and Communication\nTechnology\nIDA International Development\nAssociation (the Association)\nIDP Internally Displaced Persons\nIGAD Intergovernmental Authority on\nDevelopment\nIS Implementation Support\nKDC Kebele Development Committee\nM&E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMENA Middle East and North Africa\nMIS Management Information System\nMoANR Ministry of Agriculture and Natural\nResources\nMTR Mid Term Review\nNCB National Competitive Bidding\nNDP II Second National Development Plan\n\n\nii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "NGO Non-Governmental Organization\nNRM Natural Resources Management\nNUSAF Northern Uganda Social Action Fund\nONARS _Office National d’Assistance aux_\n_Réfugiés et Sinistrés_ (National Office\nfor Assistance to Refugees and\nDisaster Victims)\nOPM Office of the Prime Minister\nOAU Organization of African Unity\nPCDP Pastoralist Community Development\nProject\nPCU Project Coordination Unit\nPDO Project Development Objective\nPIM Project Implementation Manual\nPIST Project Implementation Support\nTeam\nPIU Project Implementation Unit\nPSNP Productive Safety Net Project\nRF Results Framework\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\nRPCU Regional Project Coordination Unit\nRPLRP Regional Pastoral Livelihoods\nResilience Project\n\n\n\nRSC Regional Steering Committee\nRTC Regional Technical Committee\nSA Social Assessment\nSAC Social Audit Committee\nSFO Senior Finance Officer\nSMP Social Management Plan\nSOP Series of Projects\nSORT Systematic Operations Risk-rating\nTool\nSSNP Social Safety Net Project\nSTA Settlement Transformation Agenda\nUN United Nations\nUNHCR [United Nations High Commissioner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_High_Commissioner_for_Refugees)\n[for Refugees](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_High_Commissioner_for_Refugees)\nWAC Woreda Project Appraisal\nCommittees\nWB World Bank\nWBG World Bank Group\nWoFED Woreda Office of Finance and\nDevelopment\nWPCT Woreda Project Coordination Team\nWSC Woreda-level Steering Committee\nWTC Woreda-level Steering Committee\n\n\n\nRegional Vice Presidents: Makhtar Diop and Hafez Ghanem\n\nRegional Director: Ahmadou Moustapha Ndiaye\nCountry Directors: Asad Alam, Diarietou Gaye, and Carolyn\n\nTurk\nSenior Global Practice Director: Ede Ijjasz-Vasquez\nPractice Manager: Robin Mearns\nTask Team Leaders: Varalakshmi Vemuru, Endeshaw Tadesse,\nTeklu Tesfaye and Benjamin Burckhart\n\n\n\nRegional Vice Presidents:\n\n\n\nRegional Director:\nCountry Directors:\n\n\n\niii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SA Social Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.7788535356521606,
+ "start": 102,
+ "end": 105
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**AFRICA / MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA**\n\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n\n**Page**\n\n\n**I** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................1**\n\nA Regional and Country Context...................................................................................... 1\n\nB Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................. 5\n\nC Contributing to Higher-Level Objectives ..................................................................... 7\n\n\n**II** **Project Development Objective ........................................................................................8**\n\nA Project Development Objective .................................................................................... 8\n\nB Project Beneficiaries ..................................................................................................... 9\n\nC Project Development Objective-Level Results Indicators .......................................... 10\n\n\n**III** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................10**\n\nA Project Components .................................................................................................... 13\n\nB Project Financing ........................................................................................................ 20\n\nC Series of Projects: Objectives and Phases ................................................................... 22\n\nD Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design ................................................ 22\n\n\n**IV** **IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................25**\n\nA Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........................................................ 25\n\nB Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 26\n\nC Sustainability............................................................................................................... 27\n\n\n**V** **Key Risks ..........................................................................................................................27**\n\nA Explanation of Overall Risk Rating ............................................................................ 28\n\n\n**VI** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY ..............................................................................................29**\n\nA Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................... 29\n\nB Technical ..................................................................................................................... 31\n\nC Financial Management ................................................................................................ 32\n\nD Procurement Management .......................................................................................... 33\n\nE Social—Including Safeguards .................................................................................... 35\n\nF Environment—including Safeguards .......................................................................... 36\n\n\niv\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "G World Bank Grievance Redress .................................................................................. 39\n\n\n**Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring .........................................................................40**\n\n\n**Annex 2: Country Contexts on with Regard to Forced Displacement ....................................47**\n\n\n**Annex 3: Detailed Project Description .......................................................................................61**\n\n\n**Annex 4: Implementation Arrangements ..................................................................................75**\n\n\n**Annex 5: Implementation Support Plan ..................................................................................132**\n\n\n**Annex 6: Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................135**\n\n\n**Annex 7: Social Management Plan for Ethiopia .....................................................................143**\n\n\n**Annex 8: Regional Secretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration ..................152**\n\n\n**Annex 9: Access to Energy ........................................................................................................157**\n\n\n**Annex 10: Map of interventions areas .....................................................................................161**\n\n\nv\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**PAD DATA SHEET**\n\n_REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI_\n_FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA_\n\n_REPUBLIC OF UGANDA_\n\n\n_Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa_\n\n_(P152822)_\n\n\n**PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT**\n\n\n_AFRICA_\n\n_MENA_\n\n\nReport No.: PAD1678\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Basic Information|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|Project ID|EA Category|Team Leader(s)|\n|P152822|B - Partial Assessment|Varalakshmi Vemuru,
Endeshaw Tadesse Gossa,
Teklu Tesfaye, Benjamin
Burckhart|\n|Lending Instrument|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|\n|Investment Project Financing|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|\n||Series of Projects [ X ]|Series of Projects [ X ]|\n|Project Implementation Start
Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|\n|May 31, 2016|June 30, 2021|June 30, 2021|\n|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date
Expected Closing Date|\n|September 1, 2016
December 31, 2021|September 1, 2016
December 31, 2021|September 1, 2016
December 31, 2021|\n|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|Joint IFC
|\n|No
|No
|No
|\n|Practice Manager
Senior Global
Practice Director
Regional Director
Regional Vice
Presidents|Practice Manager
Senior Global
Practice Director
Regional Director
Regional Vice
Presidents|Practice Manager
Senior Global
Practice Director
Regional Director
Regional Vice
Presidents|\n|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-
Vasquez
Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop
Hafez Ghanem|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-
Vasquez
Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop
Hafez Ghanem|Robin Mearns
Ede Jorge Ijjasz-
Vasquez
Ahmadou Moustapha
Ndiaye
Makhtar Diop
Hafez Ghanem|\n|Borrowers: Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), Republic of Djibouti,
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and Republic of Uganda|Borrowers: Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), Republic of Djibouti,
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and Republic of Uganda|Borrowers: Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), Republic of Djibouti,
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and Republic of Uganda|\n|Responsible Agency: IGAD|Responsible Agency: IGAD|Responsible Agency: IGAD|\n\n\nvi\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Contact: Mahboub Maalim Title: Executive Secretary|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|Col12|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|Telephone
No.:
+253 31 27 17
Email:mahboub.maalim@igad.int|\n|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|Responsible Agency: Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social (Djibouti)|\n|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|Contact:
Mahdi Mohamed Djama
Title:
Director General|\n|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|Telephone
No.:
+25377804249
Email:mahdi.mohamed.djama@gmail.com|\n|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Ethiopia)|\n|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|Contact:
Nigatu Bogale
Title:
Director, Emerging Regions
Coordination Directorate|\n|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|Telephone
No.:
+251911530077
Email:nigatu_bogale@yahoo.com|\n|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|Responsible Agency: Office of the Prime Minister (Uganda)|\n|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|Contact:
Christine Guwatudde Kintu
Title:
Permanent Secretary|\n|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|Telephone
No.:
(256-41) 434-2231/259-498
Email:ps@opm.go.ug|\n|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$ Million)**|\n|[ ]
Loan|[ ]
Loan|[ X ]
IDA
Grant|[ X ]
IDA
Grant|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|[ ]
Guarantee|\n|[ X ]
Credit|[ X ]
Credit|[ ]
Grant|[ ]
Grant|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|[ ]
Other|\n|Total Project Cost:|Total Project Cost:|Total Project Cost:|175.00|175.00|175.00|175.00|Total Bank Financing:|Total Bank Financing:|Total Bank Financing:|175.00|175.00|\n|Financing Gap:|Financing Gap:|Financing Gap:|0.00|0.00|0.00|0.00||||||\n|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|**Financing Source**
**Amount**|\n|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|00.00|00.00|00.00|00.00|00.00|00.00|\n|International Development Association
(IDA)|International Development Association
(IDA)|International Development Association
(IDA)|International Development Association
(IDA)|International Development Association
(IDA)|International Development Association
(IDA)|170.00|170.00|170.00|170.00|170.00|170.00|\n|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|5.00|5.00|5.00|5.00|5.00|5.00|\n|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|175.00|175.00|175.00|175.00|175.00|175.00|\n|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|**Expected Disbursements (in US$ Million)**|\n|Fiscal
Year|2017|2017|2018|2018|2019|2019|2019|2020|2021|2021|2022|\n|Annual|14.8|14.8|
38.7|
38.7|
56|
56|
56|
42.9|
17.9|
17.9|
4.7|\n|Cumulativ
e|14.8|14.8|
53.5|
53.5|
109.5|
109.5|
109.5|
152.4|
170.3|
170.3|
175|\n|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|\n\n\nvii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Financing Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9728253483772278,
+ "start": 2290,
+ "end": 2293
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "US",
+ "confidence": 0.6017434000968933,
+ "start": 2295,
+ "end": 2296
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Financing Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9999229907989502,
+ "start": 2402,
+ "end": 2405
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Total Project Cost",
+ "confidence": 0.7972959876060486,
+ "start": 2639,
+ "end": 2642
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Total Bank Financing",
+ "confidence": 0.5140337347984314,
+ "start": 2675,
+ "end": 2678
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financing Gap",
+ "confidence": 0.7818982601165771,
+ "start": 2702,
+ "end": 2704
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA Grant",
+ "confidence": 0.6463708281517029,
+ "start": 3043,
+ "end": 3045
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+ "confidence": 0.6968287229537964,
+ "start": 3125,
+ "end": 3127
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+ "confidence": 0.788969874382019,
+ "start": 3151,
+ "end": 3153
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Institutional Data",
+ "confidence": 0.9970483183860779,
+ "start": 3455,
+ "end": 3457
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Practice Area (Lead)|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|\n|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|\n|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|Agriculture, Energy & Extractives, Fragile, Conflict & Violence, Social Protection & Labor|\n|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|**Cross Cutting Topics**|\n|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|[ X ]
Climate Change|\n|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|[ X ]
Fragile, Conflict & Violence|\n|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|[ X ]
Gender|\n|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|[ X ]
Jobs|\n|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|[ ]
Public Private Partnership|\n|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|**Sectors / Climate Change**|\n|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|\n|Major Sector|Major Sector|Sector|%|Adaptation
Co-benefits
%|Adaptation
Co-benefits
%|Mitigation
Co-benefits
%|\n|Health and other social services|Health and other social services|Other social
services|100||||\n|Total|Total|Total|100|100|100|100|\n|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits
information applicable to this project.
X|\n|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|**Themes**|\n|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100)|\n|Major theme|Theme|Theme|Theme|Theme|%|%|\n|Social
dev/gender/inclusion|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|Conflict prevention and post-conflict
reconstruction|50|50|\n|Social
dev/gender/inclusion|Other social development|Other social development|Other social development|Other social development|25|25|\n|Social
dev/gender/inclusion|Social Inclusion|Social Inclusion|Social Inclusion|Social Inclusion|25|25|\n|Total|Total|Total|Total|Total|100|100|\n|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|\n|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|The Project Development Objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand
economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting
refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.|\n|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|\n\n\nviii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Climate Change",
+ "confidence": 0.7335913181304932,
+ "start": 360,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Public Private Partnership",
+ "confidence": 0.5150802135467529,
+ "start": 631,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits",
+ "confidence": 0.918107807636261,
+ "start": 917,
+ "end": 923
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Climate Change Co-benefits",
+ "confidence": 0.8145806789398193,
+ "start": 1050,
+ "end": 1053
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective",
+ "confidence": 0.5777992010116577,
+ "start": 1441,
+ "end": 1444
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Component Name|Cost (US$ Millions)|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure|85.00|85.00|85.00|85.00|85.00|\n|Sustainable Environmental Management|33.60|33.60|33.60|33.60|33.60|\n|Livelihoods Program|36.85|36.85|36.85|36.85|36.85|\n|Project Management and Monitoring and Evaluation|14.55|14.55|14.55|14.55|14.55|\n|Regional Support for Coordination, Capacity and
Knowledge|5.00|5.00|5.00|5.00|5.00|\n|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|\n|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Rating**|**Rating**|\n|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|Substantial|Substantial|\n|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|Moderate|Moderate|\n|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|Moderate|Moderate|\n|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|Substantial|Substantial|\n|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|Substantial|Substantial|\n|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|Substantial|Substantial|\n|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|Substantial|Substantial|\n|8. Stakeholders|8. Stakeholders|8. Stakeholders|8. Stakeholders|Moderate|Moderate|\n|9. Other|9. Other|9. Other|9. Other|||\n|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|Substantial|Substantial|\n|**Compliance**|**Compliance**|**Compliance**|**Compliance**|**Compliance**|**Compliance**|\n|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|\n|Does the Project depart from the CAS in content or in other
significant respects?|Does the Project depart from the CAS in content or in other
significant respects?|Does the Project depart from the CAS in content or in other
significant respects?|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|\n|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Does the Project require any waivers of Bank policies?
Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|\n|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Yes [ ]
No [ ]|Yes [ ]
No [ ]|Yes [ ]
No [ ]|\n|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|Yes [ ]
No [ X ]|\n|Does the Project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the Project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Does the Project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for
implementation?|Yes [ X ]
No [ ]|Yes [ X ]
No [ ]|Yes [ X ]
No [ ]|\n|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**
**Yes**
**No**|\n|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|X|X|X||\n|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|X|X|X||\n|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|X|X|X||\n|Pest Management OP/BP 4.09|Pest Management OP/BP 4.09|X|X|X||\n\n\nix\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.8652405738830566,
+ "start": 185,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01",
+ "confidence": 0.9530424475669861,
+ "start": 1276,
+ "end": 1284
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04",
+ "confidence": 0.5731119513511658,
+ "start": 1302,
+ "end": 1310
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Forests OP/BP 4.36",
+ "confidence": 0.584321916103363,
+ "start": 1328,
+ "end": 1335
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Pest Management OP/BP 4.09",
+ "confidence": 0.5715622305870056,
+ "start": 1352,
+ "end": 1360
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Pest Management OP/BP 4.09",
+ "confidence": 0.5603154301643372,
+ "start": 1361,
+ "end": 1369
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Col2|Col3|X|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|X|X||\n|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|X|X||\n|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|X|X||\n|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|X|X||\n|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|||X|\n|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n|Independent
Procurement Auditor.
Schedule II Section V 2,
Uganda and Ethiopia|One time|Within six
months after
effectiveness|Within six
months after
effectiveness|||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|Recipients shall recruit a qualified and experienced Independent auditors to carry out annual
procurement audit.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n|Adoption of the Project
Regional Strategy.
Schedule 2, Section V. 2,
IGAD|One time|Six months after
effectiveness|Six months after
effectiveness|||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|IGAD will prepare and adopt the Project Regional Strategy, in form and substance satisfactory
to the Association.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n|Establishment of the
Project Regional
Steering Committee.
Schedule 2, Section I, A,
1(b), IGAD|One time|Six months after
effectiveness|Six months after
effectiveness|||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Regional Steering Committee to provide
overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the regional level.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n|Establishment of the
Regional Secretariat.
Schedule I, A 1 (C),
IGAD|One time|Six months after
effectiveness|Six months after
effectiveness|||\n\n\n\nx\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Description of Covenant
IGAD to establish and thereafter maintain the Regional Secretariat to run the day-to-day
management of the Project at the regional level, and provide secretariat services to the Project
Regional Steering Committee.|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|\n|Project Steering
Committees. Schedule II
Section1 b, Ethiopia|One time|Six months after
effectiveness||\n|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Steering Committees at federal, regional
and Woreda levels to provide overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the federal,
regional and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Steering Committees at federal, regional
and Woreda levels to provide overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the federal,
regional and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Steering Committees at federal, regional
and Woreda levels to provide overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the federal,
regional and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Steering Committees at federal, regional
and Woreda levels to provide overall guidance and oversight for the Project at the federal,
regional and Woreda levels.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|\n|Project Technical
Committees. Schedule II
Section1 c, Ethiopia.|One time|Six months after
effectiveness||\n|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Technical Committees at federal,
regional and Woreda levels to provide technical support for the Project at the federal, regional
and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Technical Committees at federal,
regional and Woreda levels to provide technical support for the Project at the federal, regional
and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Technical Committees at federal,
regional and Woreda levels to provide technical support for the Project at the federal, regional
and Woreda levels.|**Description of Covenant**
Ethiopia to establish and thereafter maintain the Project Technical Committees at federal,
regional and Woreda levels to provide technical support for the Project at the federal, regional
and Woreda levels.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|\n|National Steering
Committee. Schedule II
Section 1 b, Uganda|One time|One month after
effectiveness||\n|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the national Steering Committee to provide overall
guidance and oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the national Steering Committee to provide overall
guidance and oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the national Steering Committee to provide overall
guidance and oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the national Steering Committee to provide overall
guidance and oversight for the Project at the national level.|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|\n|Technical Working
Committee. Schedule II
Section 1 c, Uganda|One time|One month after
effectiveness||\n|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the Technical Working Committee to provide
operational and technical oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the Technical Working Committee to provide
operational and technical oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the Technical Working Committee to provide
operational and technical oversight for the Project at the national level.|**Description of Covenant**
Uganda to establish and thereafter maintain the Technical Working Committee to provide
operational and technical oversight for the Project at the national level.|\n|||||\n|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|**Conditions**|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|\n|IDA|Subsidiary Agreement, Article V 5.01, Djibouti|Subsidiary Agreement, Article V 5.01, Djibouti|Effectiveness|\n|**Description of Condition**
The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project
Implementing Entity|**Description of Condition**
The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project
Implementing Entity|**Description of Condition**
The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project
Implementing Entity|**Description of Condition**
The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project
Implementing Entity|\n|**Sources of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|\n\n\nxi\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national Steering Committee",
+ "confidence": 0.53302401304245,
+ "start": 706,
+ "end": 709
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.937131941318512,
+ "start": 636,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Subsidiary Agreement",
+ "confidence": 0.556469202041626,
+ "start": 1073,
+ "end": 1075
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.7448268532752991,
+ "start": 1082,
+ "end": 1083
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|IDA|Partnership & Livelihood Grant Agreement
Schedule 2 Section IV B1 b, Djibouti FA.|Col3|Col4|Disbursement|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|**Description of Condition**
The Project Implementing Entity in Djibouti has provided to the Association evidence
satisfactory in form and substance that a Partnership Agreement has been signed with_Caisse_
_Populaire d’Epargne et de Crédit(_CPEC) and the first Livelihood Grant Agreement has been
signed.|\n|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|\n|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|\n|**Name**|**Role**|**Title**|**Specialization**|**Specialization**|**Unit**|\n|Varalakshmi Vemuru|Team Leader
(ADM
Responsible)|Senior Social
Development
Specialist|Task Team
Leader|Task Team
Leader|GSURR|\n|Endeshaw Tadesse
Gossa|Team Leader|Senior Social
Protection
Specialist|Co-TTL|Co-TTL|GSPDR|\n|Teklu Tesfaye|Team Leader|Senior
Agricultural
Specialist|Co-TTL|Co-TTL|GFADR|\n|Benjamin Burckhart|Team Leader|Social
Development
Specialist|Co-TTL|Co-TTL|GSURR|\n|Qaiser M. Khan|Team Member|Program Leader|Sector Lead
Economist|Sector Lead
Economist|AFCE3|\n|Andrew D. Goodland|Team Member|Program Leader|Lead Agriculture
Economist|Lead Agriculture
Economist|AFCE3|\n|Hayalsew Yilma|Team Member|Senior Irrigation
Specialist|Irrigation and
NRM|Irrigation and
NRM|GFADR|\n|Tesfahiwot Dillnessa|Team Member|Program
Assistant|Program Assistant|Program Assistant|AFCE3|\n|Shimelis Woldehawariat
Badisso|Procurement
Specialist|Senior
Procurement
Specialist|Procurement|Procurement|GGODR|\n|Meron Tadesse Techane|Financial
Management
Specialist|Senior Financial
Management
Specialist|Financial
Management|Financial
Management|GGODR|\n|Asferachew Abate
Abebe|Safeguard
Specialist|Senior
Environmental
Specialist|Environmental
Safeguards|Environmental
Safeguards|GENDR|\n|Chukwudi H. Okafor|Safeguard|Senior Social|Social Safeguards|Social Safeguards|GSURR|\n\n\nxii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Specialist|Development
Specialist|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Constance Nekessa-
Ouma|Safeguard
Specialist|Social
Development
Specialist|Social Safeguards|GSURR|\n|Catherine Asekenye
Barasa|Safeguard
Specialist|Social
Development
Specialist
|Social Safeguards|GSURR|\n|Diego Garrido Martin|Team Member|Senior Operations
Officer|Monitoring and
Evaluation
(M&E)|GCFDR|\n|Esayas Nigatu
Gebremeskel|Team Member|Livestock and
Pastoral
Development
Specialist|CDD and
Livelihood
Program|GFADR|\n|Fatou Fall|Safeguard
Specialist|Senior Social
Development
Specialist|Social Safeguards|GSURR|\n|Kadar Mouhoumed
Omar|Team Member|Operations
Analyst|Operations|MNCDJ|\n|Nagad Khaireh Allaleh|Team Member|Program
Assistant|Operations
Support|MNCDJ|\n|Grace Nakuya Musoke
Munanura|Team Member|Senior
Procurement
Specialist|Procurement|GGODR|\n|Herbert Oule|Safeguard
Specialist|Environmental
Specialist|Environmental
Safeguards|GENDR|\n|Isabella Micali Drossos|Counsel|Senior Counsel|Legal|LEGAM|\n|Ishanlosen Odiaua|Safeguard
Specialist|Consultant|Environmental
Safeguards|GEN05|\n|Moussa Djama Kayad|Team Member|Procurement
Specialist|Procurement|GGODR|\n|Edwin Nyamasege
Moguche|Team Member|Consultant|Financial
Management|GGODR|\n|Joel Byaruhanga|Team Member|Consultant|Financial
Management|GGODR|\n|Rock Jabbour|Team Member|Financial
Management
Analyst|Financial
Management|GGODR|\n|Agnes Kaye|Team Member|Program|Program Support|AFMUG|\n\n\nxiii\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Col2|Col3|Assistant|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Joseph Ellong|Joseph Ellong|Team Member|Senior Program
Assistant|Senior Program
Assistant|Program Support|Program Support|Program Support|GSURR|GSURR|\n|Sarah Coll-Black|Sarah Coll-Black|Team Member|Senior Social
Protection
Specialist|Senior Social
Protection
Specialist|Safety Nets|Safety Nets|Safety Nets|GSPDR|GSPDR|\n|Anders Pedersen|Anders Pedersen|Team Member|Energy Specialist|Energy Specialist|Renewable
Energy|Renewable
Energy|Renewable
Energy|GEEDR|GEEDR|\n|Ashutosh Raina|Ashutosh Raina|Team Member|Consultant|Consultant|Skills
Development
Specialist|Skills
Development
Specialist|Skills
Development
Specialist|GSURR|GSURR|\n|Abhinav Kumar Gupta|Abhinav Kumar Gupta|Team Member|Consultant|Consultant|Livelihoods
Specialist|Livelihoods
Specialist|Livelihoods
Specialist|GSURR|GSURR|\n|Giuseppe Manzillo|Giuseppe Manzillo|Team Member|Consultant|Consultant|Economist|Economist|Economist|GCT05|GCT05|\n|Verena Phipps-Ebeler|Verena Phipps-Ebeler|Team Member|Social
Development
Specialist|Social
Development
Specialist|Gender|Gender|Gender|GSURR|GSURR|\n|Bernhard Metz|Bernhard Metz|Team Member|Consultant|Consultant|Geographical
Information
System|Geographical
Information
System|Geographical
Information
System|GSURR|GSURR|\n|Isabelle Huynh|Isabelle Huynh|Team Member|Senior Operations
Officer|Senior Operations
Officer|Information and
Communication
Technology|Information and
Communication
Technology|Information and
Communication
Technology|GTI11|GTI11|\n|Jose C. Janeiro|Jose C. Janeiro|Team Member|Senior Finance
Officer|Senior Finance
Officer|Disbursement|Disbursement|Disbursement|WFALA|WFALA|\n|Eric Ranjeva|Eric Ranjeva|Team Member|Finance Officer|Finance Officer|Disbursement|Disbursement|Disbursement|WFALA|WFALA|\n|Christiaan Johannes
Nieuwoudt|Christiaan Johannes
Nieuwoudt|Team Member|Finance Officer|Finance Officer|Disbursement|Disbursement|Disbursement|WFALA|WFALA|\n|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|\n|**Name**|**Name**|**Title**|**Title**|**Office Phone**|**Office Phone**|**Location**|**Location**|**Location**|**Location**|\n|||||||||||\n|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|**Locations**|\n|**Country**|**First Administrative**
**Division**|**First Administrative**
**Division**|**First Administrative**
**Division**|**Location**|**Planned**|**Planned**|**Actual**|**Actual**|**Comments**|\n|Djibouti|Obock|Obock|Obock|Obock|X|X|X|X||\n|Djibouti|Ali Sabieh|Ali Sabieh|Ali Sabieh|Ali Sabieh
Region|X|X|X|X||\n|Ethiopia|Afar National Regional|Afar National Regional|Afar National Regional|Afar Region|X|X|X|X||\n\n\nxiv\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|State|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Ethiopia|Binshangul Gumuz
National Regional State|Benishangul-
Gumuz
Region|X|X||\n|Ethiopia|Gambela National
Regional State|Gambela
Region|X|X||\n|Ethiopia|Ethiopian Somali National
Regional State|Somali
Region|X|X||\n|Ethiopia|Tigray National Regional
State|Tigray
Region|X|X||\n|Uganda|Arua|Arua District|X|X||\n|Uganda|Adjumani|Adjumani
District|X|X||\n|Uganda|Isingiro|Isingiro
District|X|X||\n|Uganda|Kiryandongo|Kiryandongo
District|X|X||\n|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|**Consultants (Will be disclosed in the Monthly Operational Summary)**|\n|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|Consultants Required?
Yes|\n\n\nxv\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Monthly Operational Summary",
+ "confidence": 0.9998055100440979,
+ "start": 204,
+ "end": 207
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "# **I STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n**A** **Regional and Country Context**\n\n\n1. Global forced displacement is arguably the defining humanitarian/development challenge\nof this generation [1] . The number of displaced people is growing. Wars, conflict, and persecution\nhave forcibly displaced a cumulative total of 59.5 million people—19.5 million refugees and\nasylum seekers and 38.2 million internally displaced persons by the end of 2014 [2] . According to\nthe World Bank Group’s November 2015 report, forced displacement remains largely\nconcentrated in low and middle income countries, particularly in Africa, the Middle East, and\nSouth Asia. [3]\n\n2. Africa hosts over one third of the world’s displaced population, accounting for about one\nquarter of the total number of refugees globally as well as the greatest number of internally\ndisplaced persons. The Horn of Africa (HOA), a region with an estimated 242 million\ninhabitants, includes eight countries: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan,\nSudan, and Uganda, which collectively host more than 9.5 million displaced persons, including\nmore than 6.5 million internally displaced persons and approximately 3 million refugees.\nDisplacement has been protracted in the HOA, with refugee arrivals recorded in 1959 in Uganda\nand in 1991 in both Ethiopia and Djibouti. Migration within and outside the HOA is driven by\nnatural events and human actions; with climate change and environmental degradation acting as\nthreat multipliers, compounding displacement [4] .\n\n3. The Regional Initiative in Support of the HOA, launched by the World Bank on October\n23, 2014 [5], built on two interrelated pillars: (i) vulnerability and resilience; and (ii) economic\nopportunity and integration to address key drivers of instability and promote development in the\nHOA. Displacement has emerged as a regional phenomenon with spillover effects in countries\nneighboring those experiencing conflict and posing major challenges to reducing poverty and\nachieving sustainable development with peace and security in the region. Despite its rich\nendowment in human, social, and natural capital, the HOA is plagued by a complex history of\ncapacity constraints, pockets of poverty and insecurity, increasing environmental degradation,\nand a range of other persistent development challenges. Conflict remains endemic, and the\ncomplex cultural, social, and political nature of the conflicts is compounded by demographic\nshifts due to population growth and movement of people; imbalanced service provision;\nincreasing competition for scarce natural resources; and harsh climatic conditions, including\nfrequent droughts and floods.\n\n4. In June 2015, a regional study entitled “Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the\nHorn of Africa” was prepared. It reinforced the regional nature of forced displacement in the\nHOA with a clear regional “spill-over effect” of the violence and insecurity within a country.\nWhen refugees cross international borders, neighboring countries that host these refugees\ndirectly bear the consequences of that violence and insecurity. This calls for a coordinated\n\n\n1 “A Response to Global Forced Displacement.” Staff Working Paper (November 2015), World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.\n2 ibid\n3 Over half of the refugees worldwide come from Syria, Afghanistan, and Somalia; other countries that account for large numbers are Sudan,\nSouth Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, Iraq, and Eritrea.\n4 “Accelerating Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon Development: The Africa Climate Business Plan.” Africa Region, World Bank Group,\nWashington, D.C.\n5 “Leaders Commit Billions in Major New Development Initiative for the Horn of Africa.” Press Release (October 27), World Bank, Washington,\n[D.C. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/10/27/leaders-commit-billions-major-new-development-initiative-horn-africa.](http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/10/27/leaders-commit-billions-major-new-development-initiative-horn-africa)\n\n\n1\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "regional response between humanitarian and development partners as a prerequisite for reaching\ndevelopment solutions for improving the prospects of the displaced.\n\n5. The study found that refugee camps and settlements are located in relatively\nunderdeveloped and underserved areas compared with the rest of their host countries. The\nrefugee-hosting communities have a precarious socioeconomic situation, plagued by food\ninsecurity, limited access to basic social services and economic infrastructure; poor livelihood\nopportunities; and a degraded natural resource base. The study highlighted that the protracted\ndisplacement of refugees has further exacerbated the situation of communities that host refugees\nwith competition over scarce social services and economic infrastructures, livelihood\nopportunities, and environmental and natural resources, which has led to a growing incidence of\nconflicts and clashes. Enhancing the productive capacities and coping mechanisms of the host\npopulations is seen as an important step for safeguarding a very-much-needed asylum space for\nrefugees in the host countries in the HOA. A shrinking of the asylum space will likely leave\nrefugees stuck in legal and humanitarian limbo, which will lead to deeper poverty and greater\nvulnerability.\n\n6. The proposed regional operation, the Development Response to Displacement Impacts\nProject (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa builds on the conclusions and recommendations of the\nstudy covering the three refugee-hosting countries of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda for the first\nphase [6] of a longer-term engagement. The countries included in this first phase face significant\nforced displacement challenges: (i) Ethiopia is host to the largest number of refugees in Africa;\n(ii) Uganda has a very progressive refugee policy and is a favored asylum destination; and (iii)\nDjibouti has a major problem with significant migrant inflows alongside refugees. Based on the\nimplementation experience, results, and learning, the proposed project could potentially be\ndeepened in the proposed targeted areas and expanded to other refugee hosting districts in\nUganda, and to other countries in the region.\n\n7. Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda have domestic refugee legislations that regulate the\nasylum and refugee status determination process; set up national refugee agencies; and provide\nvarious rights and privileges to all refugees, including protection and nonrefoulment [7] (details in\nAnnex 2). However, none of the domestic refugee legislations in the three project countries\nprovide a path to citizenship for refugees, and none allow for the local integration of refugees.\nThe proposed project is situated within these existing legal and policy frameworks and in a\ncontext of protracted displacement in shrinking asylum space.\n\n\n**Djibouti**\n\n8. Djibouti is one of the smallest countries in Africa. It covers an area of 23,200 square\nkilometers and is home to a population of about 864,617 (2011). The small size of Djibouti’s\neconomy limits its ability to diversify production and increases its reliance on foreign markets,\nmaking it more vulnerable to external market downturns and hampering access to external\ncapital. With less than 1,000 square kilometers of arable land (0.04 percent of the country’s total\nland area) and an average annual rainfall of only 130 millimeters, Djibouti is completely\ndependent on imports to meet its food needs. Faced with this scarcity and successive droughts,\n\n\n6 The DRDIP is a first phase of a potential SOP in the Horn of Africa. It is expected that, in due course, the project could include Kenya and\nSouth Sudan with IDA financing and Somalia, Sudan, and Eritrea through trust funds (because they are currently not eligible for IDA).\n7 “No Contracting State shall expel or return (‘refouler’) a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or\nfreedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.” (Article\n33(1) of the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.\n\n\n2\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "the country’s traditionally nomadic people have settled, primarily in urban areas. Approximately\n71 percent of the population lives in cities—58 percent in Djibouti-Ville, the capital, alone.\n\n9. Djibouti has been hosting refugees since 1991. Over 15,000 refugees, mainly Somali, are\ncurrently hosted at the Holl Holl and Ali Addeh refugee camps in the Ali Sabieh region; Yemeni\nrefugees are hosted at the Markazi refugee camp in the Obock region. Following the 2014\nYemeni crisis, over 30,600 persons of various nationalities have arrived in Djibouti. As of\nDecember 2015, the arrivals from Yemen include 16,691 persons (55 percent) who are Yemeni\nnationals; 11,996 (39 percent) transiting migrants; and 1,919 (6 percent) Djiboutian returnees. As\n[of December 2015, of the 6,179 refugees registered, 2,829 (United Nations High Commissioner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_High_Commissioner_for_Refugees)\n[for Refugees](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_High_Commissioner_for_Refugees) -UNHCR 2016) are sheltered in the Markazi refugee camp; the rest live in Obock\ntown and Djibouti city. In Djibouti, the Ministry of the Interior is the main government\ninstitution in charge of refugee protection. The national refugee agency is the Office National\nd’Assistance aux Réfugiés et Sinistrés (ONARS) (National Office for Assistance to Refugees\nand Disaster Victims).\n\n10. In addition to hosting Somali refugees, Djibouti is the main transit route for migrants\nfrom HOA countries traveling to the Middle East and Europe in search of economic\nopportunities. Mixed migration [8] is a common challenge in the HOA, as evidenced by the\nhazardous journey made by thousands of mostly Ethiopians but also Somali migrants through\nDjibouti in transit to Yemen and the Arab Peninsula in search of better lives in Saudi Arabia and\nthe Gulf States. Since 2009, departure points around the Obock area of Djibouti have become the\nlocus for mixed migration flows of individuals attempting to reach Yemen. By 2014, the rapidly\nrising number of people travelling through Djibouti en route to Yemen reached 94,000. The\nInternational Organization on Migration in Djibouti opened the Migrant Response Centre in\nObock town, which houses some migrants, however the pressure on local services and\nconsequently on residents remains.\n\n\n**Ethiopia**\n\n11. Ethiopia is a large, diverse, and landlocked country with an area of 1.1 million km [2] . It is\nalso a country of many nations, nationalities, and peoples, with a total population of about 94.1\nmillion and a population growth rate of 2.6 percent (2013). Only 17 percent of the population\nlives in urban centers, the great majority in Addis Ababa. Ethiopia has experienced strong\neconomic growth, averaging 10.7 percent per year between 2003 and 2011 compared with the\nregional average of 5.0 percent. Gross domestic product (GDP) increased by 9.7 percent in fiscal\n2012/13 and 10.3 percent in fiscal 2013/14. The growth reflects a mix of factors, including\nagricultural modernization, the development of new export sectors, strong global commodity\ndemand, and government-led development investments. On the supply side, growth was driven\nby an expansion of the services and agricultural sectors, while the role of the industrial sector\nwas relatively modest.\n\n12. Ethiopia hosts the largest population of refugees in Africa as a consequence of droughts,\nconflicts, political events, and civil wars in neighboring countries such as Somalia, Eritrea, South\nSudan, and Sudan. At the end of December 2015, 733,644 refugees were distributed across the\nfive National Regional States of Afar, Tigray, Ethiopian Somali, Gambela, and Benishangul\n\n8 UNHCR defines mixed migration as a movement in which a number of persons are travelling together, generally in an irregular manner, using\nthe same routes and means of transport, but for different reasons. Persons travelling as part of mixed movements have varying needs, and their\nprofiles include asylum-seekers, refugees, trafficked persons, unaccompanied/separated children, and migrants in irregular situations.\n\n\n3\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "refugees registered",
+ "confidence": 0.6554367542266846,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 162
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "United Nations High Commissioner",
+ "confidence": 0.6702521443367004,
+ "start": 167,
+ "end": 171
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.7055238485336304,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8749020099639893,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Migrant Response Centre",
+ "confidence": 0.6292595863342285,
+ "start": 392,
+ "end": 395
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "mixed migration",
+ "confidence": 0.9226540327072144,
+ "start": 691,
+ "end": 693
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.9648953080177307,
+ "start": 689,
+ "end": 690
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5121810436248779,
+ "start": 662,
+ "end": 663
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5840318202972412,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 626
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Gumuz at 23 refugee camps located in 16 woredas and 23 kebeles (UNHCR 2015). The refugeehosting woredas are characterized by harsh weather conditions, poor infrastructure, weak\ninstitutional capacity, and poverty. The presence of refugees puts further strains on already weak\npublic services and economic infrastructures as well as on livelihood opportunities, jeopardizing\nthe resilience of the communities hosting refugees.\n\n13. Most Eritrean and Somali refugees in Ethiopia are living in protracted displacement. The\nmajority of refugees live in camps situated near the borders of their respective countries of\norigin. The Administration for Refugee and Returnee Affairs (ARRA) administers the refugee\ncamps, with financial and technical assistance from the UNHCR and other aid agencies.\nEducation, health, and other services are provided by UNHCR’s implementing partners,\nincluding ARRA and international and local Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs).\n\n\n**Uganda**\n\n14. Uganda is one of the least urbanized countries in Africa, with 83 percent of the\npopulation (or roughly 28.9 million people out of a total of 34.9 million) living in rural areas,\nmaking agriculture dominated by smallholder farmers and rural development important. Uganda\nhas experienced robust GDP growth, averaging 6 percent from 2005 to 2014, but poverty\nreduction, while substantial, has not kept pace. Uganda has a record of prudent macroeconomic\nmanagement and structural reform that has helped the country overcome exogenous shocks.\nHowever, due to high population growth, real GDP growth per capita averaged only about 3.5\npercent over the 2005–14 period. The poverty rate fell from 56.4 percent in 1992 to 19.1 percent\nin 2014, but there is substantial and growing urban–rural and regional inequality. Uganda will\nneed to address several challenges in order to enable structural transformation of the economy,\nstrengthen competitiveness, and sustain high growth. Lack of integration with northern Uganda\nfurther creates challenges of social cohesion. Infrastructure gaps and bottlenecks need to be\naddressed to promote greater physical and digital connectivity both within the country, the wider\nregion, and the global markets. Agricultural productivity and value addition need to be\nstrengthened to improve the livelihoods of the average citizen.\n\n15. By December 2015, as a result of ongoing conflicts and instability in the Democratic\nRepublic of Congo, Somalia and South Sudan, Uganda was hosting 512,691 refugees and\nasylum-seekers, making it the third largest refugee-hosting country in Africa. The December\n2013 South Sudanese crisis and the 2015 Burundian crisis resulted in major refugee influxes.\nApproximately 190,000 Congolese refugees are hosted in South-West and Mid-West Uganda,\nand almost 167,000 South Sudanese are hosted in the northern districts.\n\n16. Uganda’s current refugee policy framework is among the more generous and progressive\n[in the HOA, in Africa, and globally. The 2006 Refugee Act and 2010 Refugees Regulations](http://www.refworld.org/docid/4b7baba52.html)\nentitle refugees to work; provide them freedom of movement and access to Ugandan social\nservices, including documents such as government identification (IDs); Conventional Travel\nDocuments (CTDs); and birth, death, marriage, and education certificates. As a matter of policy,\nall refugees in settlements on gazetted lands [9] are provided with a subsistence agriculture plot\n(albeit of diminishing size due to overcrowding), but only a few refugees who are in settlements\non communally-owned land have more than a small kitchen garden. Refugees in Uganda can\n\n\n9 Gazetted lands have been published in the official gazette by either a statutory instrument or a legal notice issued by the responsible minister.\n\n\n4\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "GDP growth",
+ "confidence": 0.5306130051612854,
+ "start": 219,
+ "end": 221
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.9853515625,
+ "start": 159,
+ "end": 160
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2005–14",
+ "confidence": 0.525111973285675,
+ "start": 284,
+ "end": 287
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "poverty rate",
+ "confidence": 0.5031411051750183,
+ "start": 290,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.932989239692688,
+ "start": 159,
+ "end": 160
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "subsistence agriculture plot",
+ "confidence": 0.5559201836585999,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 603
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.8824730515480042,
+ "start": 635,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9678653478622437,
+ "start": 617,
+ "end": 618
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "own property and enter into contracts, including land leases. [10] The Department of Refugees\nunder the Office of Prime Minister administers the refugee settlements.\n\n\n**B** **Sectoral and Institutional Context**\n\n\n17. The refugee-hosting countries of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda have remained relatively\npeaceful in recent years, unlike neighboring countries that have been devastated by war and\nconflict. As a result, refugees have been pouring across borders. Refugees in the HOA are hosted\nclose to international borders in communities facing poverty and unemployment, deficits in\nhuman capital development and social service delivery, and limited access to basic infrastructure.\nInvestments in these traditionally underserved border areas under the proposed operation are\nfirmly aligned with the national priorities of the three project countries.\n\n18. The presence of refugees in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda has resulted in negative\neconomic, social, and environmental impacts, in addition to some positive economic impacts on\nrefugee-hosting communities. The Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the HOA study\nidentified negative impacts, including rising food and commodity prices, the depression of local\nwage rates, and increasing environmental degradation. Multi-stakeholder consultations in the\nthree host countries, especially with refugee-hosting communities and the refugees themselves\nduring preparation, revealed a number of impacts that refugee presence has on hosting areas,\nincluding increased competition—direct and indirect—for basic social services such as health,\neducation, and drinking water; a degraded physical and natural environment due to high pressure\non biomass to meet energy and construction needs; limited livelihood opportunities; and\ndecreasing water availability evidenced by deeper boreholes and increased costs for water\ntransport; crowded health centers and classrooms; and increased distances, time, and/or cost for\ncollecting wood for cooking and lighting.\n\n19. However, consultations held with host communities and local authorities revealed that\nrefugees at camps in Djibouti and Ethiopia as well as in settlements in Uganda are provided with\nhumanitarian assistance by the UNHCR and its implementing partners, including food aid,\nhousing materials, basic education and health services, and drinking water and sanitation\nfacilities. Inter- and intra-camp roads are being set-up in areas of protracted displacement, along\nwith secondary schools and medical centers. Informal economic activities and remittances\naugment the buying power of refugees. Consultations with refugees revealed similar concerns\nand brought to the fore their unmet needs in terms of access to higher education, referral health\nservices, better-quality energy sources for cooking and lighting, and—importantly—\nopportunities for skills enhancement and avenues for pursuing livelihoods. There was no denying\nthat this competition was also a driver of latent and potential conflicts between the hosts and the\nrefugees. Benefits and positive impacts of refugee presence for host communities include:\nrefugee households serving as a market outlet for animal- and host-produced agricultural\nproducts; an increase in the availability of labor, especially for local agricultural production; and\ninfrastructure investments made by UNHCR.\n\n20. In Djibouti, which is currently at peace, underlying tensions are exacerbated by high\npoverty and unemployment levels and by cross-border threats. At the same time, refugees from\nneighboring countries that are devastated by war and conflict are spilling into Djibouti in large\nnumbers, aggravating the economic and social situation. An example is the recent Yemeni\n\n[10 Refugees have the explicit right to lease land for up to 49 years under the Uganda National Land Policy of 2013. In practice, however, refugees](http://landportal.info/sites/default/files/the_uganda_national_land_policy-_february_2013.pdf)\nhave limited access to agricultural land, and this is the primary constraint preventing them from moving from subsistence to surplus production.\n\n\n5\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "instability. According to available data from the Djiboutian government, Djibouti’s absolute\npoverty rate was an estimated 23 percent [11] in 2013, down from 24.1 percent a decade ago. The\nunemployment rate is high: approximately 75 percent of youth are unemployed. Since 2007,\ndrought conditions—the worst in 60 years in the region—have exacerbated poverty and have\ntriggered substantial refugee flows. Estimates are that the drought has affected at least half of the\nrural population in Djibouti, with annual economic losses of 3.9 percent of GDP for the period\n2008–11. Social tensions could worsen as pressure is added to an already fragile service-delivery\nand livelihood scenario. Project interventions will help address vulnerabilities, such as poverty\nand unemployment, deficits in human development and social service delivery, and limited\naccess to basic infrastructure, while building resilience. While refugee policies, except for\nUganda’s, do not explicitly refer to the right to work, refugees do participate in economic\nactivities. The DRDIP will therefore create a socioeconomic ecosystem for communities in\nrefugee-hosting areas that will facilitate greater economic returns for both communities hosting\nrefugees and for the refugees themselves. The DRDIP falls in the medium-term strategy\n(Strategy for Accelerated Growth and Employment Promotion—SCAPE [12] ) of the Vision\nDjibouti 2035, including improving the standard of living, reducing unemployment (employment\ncreation) and reducing vulnerability, among other objectives.\n\n21. Ethiopia has completed the implementation of the first phase of its ambitious Growth and\nTransformation Plan (GTP I; 2010/11–2014/15) and recently started implementation of the\nsecond phase (GTP II 2015/16 – 2019/20), which sets the long-term goal of having Ethiopia\nbecome a middle-income country by 2023 with growth rates of at least 11 percent per year\nduring the GTP II period. To achieve the plan’s goals and objectives, the Government of\nEthiopia has followed a “developmental and democratic state” model with a strong role for the\nGovernment in select aspects of the economy. It has prioritized key sectors, such as industry and\nagriculture, as drivers of sustained and inclusive economic growth and job creation. The GTP\nreaffirms the Government of Ethiopia’s commitment to human development, and the programs\nof its development partners are broadly aligned with its priorities. The DRDIP will directly\ncontribute to the plan’s strategic pillar of maintaining the rapid, broad-based, and equitable\neconomic growth and development by expanding demand-driven, basic socioeconomic services\nand creating access to economic infrastructure in the emerging and displacement-impacted areas\nof the country, thereby contributing toward the Sustainable Development Goal of ending poverty\nin all of its forms.\n\n22. Uganda, as part of its Second National Development Plan (NDP II), emphasizes the need\nfor inclusive and sustainable growth while increasing overall competitiveness and creating\nadditional wealth and employment. Because refugee-hosting areas are more vulnerable to shocks\nthan non-impacted areas, the Government of Uganda is currently developing the Settlement\nTransformation Agenda, which aims at achieving self-reliance and local settlement among\nrefugees and to promote social development in refugee-hosting areas. Some of its objectives are\nrelevant to the DRDIP, including sustainable livelihoods, environmental protection, and\ncommunity infrastructure. The DRDIP will support the implementation of the Settlement\nTransformation Agenda by adopting an area-based and progressive-solutions approach in four\nrefugee-hosting districts in Uganda.\n\n\n11 DISED, 2014, EDAM-BC 2013, Rapport de Seuil de Pauvreté\n12 _Stratégie de Croissance Accélérée et de Promotion de l’Emploi_\n\n\n6\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "available data from the Djiboutian government",
+ "confidence": 0.8874296545982361,
+ "start": 4,
+ "end": 10
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.9662991166114807,
+ "start": 11,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.8826589584350586,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.9282099008560181,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas",
+ "confidence": 0.8891433477401733,
+ "start": 200,
+ "end": 202
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9291529059410095,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "GTP II",
+ "confidence": 0.6592381000518799,
+ "start": 306,
+ "end": 308
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.932338535785675,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Settlement\nTransformation Agenda",
+ "confidence": 0.5144603848457336,
+ "start": 557,
+ "end": 560
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5014148950576782,
+ "start": 577,
+ "end": 579
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8626402616500854,
+ "start": 570,
+ "end": 571
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Settlement\nTransformation Agenda",
+ "confidence": 0.6831770539283752,
+ "start": 609,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.71229088306427,
+ "start": 629,
+ "end": 630
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "23. The capacity of government institutions in the refugee-hosting areas of the three countries\nis relatively weak. The DRDIP will contribute to social, economic, and infrastructural\nconnectivity of the underserved communities with the overall national development processes by\nsupporting the sensitization of local authorities, the capacity enhancement of local governments,\nand the active engagement of affected communities and grassroots institutions in the local\nplanning, decision-making process, and oversight of public services and in the implementation\nand operation and maintenance of infrastructure.\n\n\n**C** **Contributing to Higher-Level Objectives**\n\n\n24. The DRDIP will directly contribute to the twin goals of the World Bank Group’s global\nstrategy: ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity in a sustainable manner. The\ncentral rationale behind the DRDIP is that the World Bank Group cannot effectively achieve\nthese goals without first engaging more intensively and creatively to address the complex\ndevelopment challenges that are linked to conflict and the impact of forced displacement.\n\n25. The “Forward Look” of the World Bank Group [13] recognizes that protecting the poor and\ndisplaced from fragility and violence is a key developmental challenge for the next decade, in a\ncontext of the potential rise of fragile and conflict-affected areas around the world, but\nparticularly in Africa. The DRDIP will respond to the rising client demand for lessening the\nhuman and economic impacts of conflict and violence by supporting refugees and their host\ncommunities, reconstructing and rehabilitating critical socioeconomic infrastructure, and—\nimportantly—by containing regional spillovers of conflicts. The DRDIP is also closely aligned\nwith the World Bank’s Strategy for Addressing Forced Displacement, presented to the\nDevelopment Committee, through a developmental approach to support host communities better\nmanage the shocks and impacts of the refugee presence.\n\n26. The DRDIP contributes to the World Bank’s Africa Development Strategy, especially\nPillar 2 (Vulnerability and Resilience), because it is designed to mitigate the impacts of the\nrefugee presence on vulnerable host communities in order to improve their resilience and\nstrengthen the capacity of the public sector. The project supports the Regional HOA Initiative\nrecommendations regarding a development intervention that addresses refugee-hosting areas,\nwhich would be focused on building host community resilience by addressing negative\nenvironmental and economic impacts and by investing in infrastructure to improve economic\nopportunities for refugees and host communities. Global experience shows that self-reliant\nrefugees are better prepared to return to their countries of origin (World Bank 2015a).\nSignificantly, the DRDIP’s investments in historically under-resourced marginal areas in\nDjibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda will promote shared prosperity by enabling households to\nachieve enhanced human capital development, greater resilience with increased incomes and\nassets, and an improved physical environment. Given the protracted displacement of refugees in\nthe project areas, this will require sustainable investments.\n\n27. Additionally, the DRDIP contributes to the new MENA Strategy “Economic and Social\nInclusion for Peace and Stability in the Middle East and North Africa: A New Strategy for the\nWorld Bank Group” by investing in the underserved and less-developed refugee-hosting\ncommunities. The project is expected to increase the resilience of local communities to refugees\nin Djibouti, which directly supports the third pillar on resilience to refugee and migration shocks\n\n\n13 Forward Look: Second Engagement, World Bank Group: Meeting Future Challenges.” World Bank Group, Washington, D.C\n\n\n7\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.9711238741874695,
+ "start": 20,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank Group",
+ "confidence": 0.5198950171470642,
+ "start": 116,
+ "end": 119
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting areas of the three countries",
+ "confidence": 0.5673484206199646,
+ "start": 9,
+ "end": 15
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "underserved communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7426364421844482,
+ "start": 33,
+ "end": 35
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.9411336183547974,
+ "start": 236,
+ "end": 237
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7129605412483215,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 234
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5445441007614136,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank Group",
+ "confidence": 0.8661220073699951,
+ "start": 547,
+ "end": 550
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5835616588592529,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "on host communities by focusing on building trust and their assets by mitigating the impacts of\nthe refugee presence and thus safeguarding the asylum space. Given the cross regional nature of\nthe DRDIP, it also directly supports the second pillar on regional collaboration across both the\nAfrica and the MENA regions.\n\n28. At the national level, the DRDIP supports the main objectives of national development\nstrategies and policies and is fully consistent with the Country Partnership Strategy for the three\nproject countries (table 1.1).\n\n\n**Table 1.1. Alignment of the DRDIP with the Country Partnership Strategies and Framework**\n\n**Country** **Alignment with the Country Partnership Strategy/Framework**\n\nThe project is aligned with the International Development Association’s (the\n**Djibouti**\nAssociation’s) Country Partnership Strategy (FY14-FY17) for Djibouti, which rests on\ntwo pillars: (i) reducing vulnerability; and (ii) strengthening the business environment.\nThe DRDIP focuses on the first pillar of the Country Partnership Strategy by increasing\naccess to basic social services and economic opportunities to poor communities and by\nstrengthening local governance in disadvantaged rural and urban areas. The project is also\naligned with the Performance and Learning Review (FY16) which rests on the two\nrevised pillars: (i) reducing vulnerability; and (ii) strengthening public and private-sector\ncapacity for service delivery.\n**Ethiopia** The project supports a number of the strategic objectives of the Association’s Country\nPartnership Strategy (FY13–FY16) for Ethiopia, including increasing access to and\nquality of infrastructure (roads, water, and sanitation); promoting natural resource\ndevelopment; increasing access to quality health and education services; and creating\nlivelihood opportunities. It also contributes to the foundation pillar of good governance\nand state building.\n**Uganda** The project is fully aligned with the Association’s Country Partnership Framework\n(FY16-FY21) for Uganda. It will contribute to the first strategic focus area of Framework\nby improving social service delivery, and to the second by enhancing resilience of the\npoor and the vulnerable in Uganda.\n\n# **II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE**\n\n\n**A** **Project Development Objective**\n\n\n29. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve access to basic social services,\nexpand economic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities\nhosting refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.\n\n30. The proposed regional project will ensure that citizens participate and engage in the\nprocess of identifying and prioritizing their developmental needs, including expanding\nsocioeconomic infrastructure and livelihood opportunities to improve self-reliance among\nrefugee-hosting communities, improving social cohesion between refugees and refugee-hosting\ncommunities, increasing the voices and roles of citizens in decision making regarding\ndevelopment, and eliciting a greater demand for social accountability. The operational approach\nwill be CDD and will involve: (i) capacity support to grassroots institutions; (ii) ensuring that the\nvoices of all communities are heard in the decision making process; (iii) strengthening\n\n\n8\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.9309114813804626,
+ "start": 33,
+ "end": 34
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country Partnership Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.869692862033844,
+ "start": 79,
+ "end": 82
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "International Development Association",
+ "confidence": 0.5243421792984009,
+ "start": 137,
+ "end": 140
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5162265300750732,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country Partnership Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.8100258111953735,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Association",
+ "confidence": 0.5929706692695618,
+ "start": 277,
+ "end": 278
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.6618896722793579,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country Partnership Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.7135710120201111,
+ "start": 356,
+ "end": 359
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.6293815970420837,
+ "start": 343,
+ "end": 344
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting communities",
+ "confidence": 0.844954788684845,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 498
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE",
+ "confidence": 0.6953993439674377,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 405
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8570414185523987,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 498
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regional project",
+ "confidence": 0.7488135695457458,
+ "start": 465,
+ "end": 467
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5995752811431885,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 498
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "decentralized government administrative functions; and (iv) investing in public-service delivery\nand social mobilization to enhance social cohesion among beneficiary communities.\n\n\n**B** **Project Beneficiaries**\n\n\n31. The project will be focused on communities in refugee-hosting areas that have\nexperienced negative impacts due to a refugee presence. The beneficiaries of the project\ninvestments will be both the host and refugee communities (details in Annex 2). The project is\npotentially expected to benefit a total host population of 1,204,568 and a total refugee population\nof 821,942 (table 2.1).\n\n\n**Table 2.1. Beneficiary Details**\n\n|Country|Host population|Refugee Population|\n|---|---|---|\n|Djibouti|90,634|19,377|\n|Ethiopia|485,130|604,908|\n|Uganda|628,804|296,406|\n|Total|1,204,568|821,942|\n\n\n\n32. The project will support an area-based planning approach that will enable communities to\nidentify and prioritize investments with a specific focus on women, female-headed households,\nand youth, groups that are disproportionately affected by displacement. Even though the project\nis focused on the needs of host communities, its holistic approach will ensure that refugees will\nbenefit from its investments in socioeconomic infrastructure, environmental amelioration, and\nlivelihood opportunities and will contribute to the design of transitional/progressive solutions for\nrefugees in a more conducive and opportunistic social and economic ecosystem. These\ninvestments will also mitigate latent and potential conflicts caused by increased competition for\nservices, livelihoods, and natural resources. Currently, there are existing/established committees\namong both refugees and host communities that meet regularly, discuss outstanding issues,\nresolve problems, and jointly devise solutions and monitor progress. These arrangements will be\nharnessed and reinforced to encourage interaction and greater social cohesion between the\nrefugees and host communities.\n\n33. The project’s institutional beneficiaries include local governments, implementing agency\nstaff, and the agencies responsible for refugees in each of the DRDIP countries as well as the\nIntergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD). It is envisaged that the careful integration\nof community priorities into the local government development planning process will ensure\nownership and sustainability of the investments at the community and local government levels.\n\n34. Project beneficiary communities will therefore benefit from: investments in basic\nsocioeconomic infrastructure financed under the project; increased opportunities for augmenting\nincomes from traditional and nontraditional livelihoods; improved environmental and ecosystem\nservices; improvements in local governance and accountability; improved access to basic social\nservices, connectivity, and domestic energy; and reduced exposure to protection risks such as\ngender-based violence.\n\n35. The project targeted areas include all of the refugee-hosting areas in Djibouti and\nEthiopia and four of the nine in Uganda. (See table 2.2 and Annex 2 for details.)\n\n\n**Table 2.2. Project Areas**\n**Country** **Project Targeted Areas**\n\n\n9\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Djibouti** Two regions, two sub prefectures, and one town with surrounding areas\n\n\n\n\n - Ali Sabieh Region: Ali Addeh and Holl Holl\n\n - Obock Region: Obock Town and surrounding\n**Ethiopia** Five regions, 16 woredas with 117 kebeles\n\n\n\n\n - Afar National Regional State: Asayita and Berahle Woreda with 11 kebeles\n\n - Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State: Mao-Komo Special Woreda and\nBambasi and Homosha Woredas with 32 kebeles\n\n - Gambela National Regional State: Gog, Abol, and Dimma Woredas, and Itang\nSpecial Woreda with 28 kebeles\n\n - Tigrai National Regional State: Tahtay-Adyabo, Tsimbla and Tselemt Asgede\nWoreda with 15 kebeles\n\n - Ethiopian Somali National Regional State: Dollo Ado, Boklomanyo, Awbarre,\nand Kebribeyah Woreda with 31 kebeles\n**Uganda** Four districts, three town councils, and 13 subcounties\n\n\n\n\n- Adjumani District: Adjumani Town Council and Subcounties of Pakere, Dzaipi,\nUkusijoni, and Itirikwa\n\n- Isingioro District: Isingiro Town Council and Subcounties of Kikagati, Rushasha,\nNgarama, and Rugaga\n\n- Arua District: Subcounties of Uriama, Odupi, and Rigbo\n\n- Kiryandongo District: Bweyale Town Council and Subcounties of Kiryandongo,\nand Mutunda\n\n\n\n**C** **Project Development Objective-Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n36. The following key indicators will be used to track progress toward the PDO:\n\n(i) Beneficiaries with access to social and economic services and infrastructure\n(disaggregated by type of service and target group) [14]\n(ii) Direct project beneficiaries (number)\n(iii) Female beneficiaries (percentage)\n(iv) Beneficiaries of economic development activities that report an increase in\nincome (disaggregated by type of service, gender, and target group)\n(v) Land area where sustainable land management practices have been adopted as a\nresult of the project (hectare)\n(vi) Strategy for the Regional Secretariat and annual progress reports endorsed by\nparticipating countries\n\n# **III PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n37. The DRDIP is a US$175 million equivalent regional operation to address the impacts of\nforced displacement on countries and communities in the HOA that are hosting refugees. It is a\nmulti-sectoral development response by the governments of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda. The\nproposed regional operation addresses unmet social, economic, and environmental needs in local\nhost communities within the three countries. The proposed financing instrument is investment\nproject financing, with total proposed IDA funds of US$175 million equivalent to be disbursed\n\n\n14 The target group will be disaggregated by gender, host, internally displaced peoples, and refugee communities, as appropriate.\n\n\n10\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective-Level Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9834059476852417,
+ "start": 220,
+ "end": 225
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5507713556289673,
+ "start": 246,
+ "end": 247
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9192011952400208,
+ "start": 344,
+ "end": 347
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "as credit at US$20 million equivalent for Djibouti; US$100 million equivalent for Ethiopia;\nUS$50 million equivalent for Uganda; and a US$5 million equivalent grant to IGAD.\n\n38. **Innovative design.** Key innovative aspects of the project design include (i) its particular\nfocus on communities hosting refugees, and (ii) the use of government systems including\ngovernment financing systems, structures, and institutions to deliver a development response to\nforced displacement. The targeted areas in the three participating countries face significant\ndevelopment deficits compared to the rest of their respective countries, which is reflected in the\nlimited investments made by each of these governments in these host communities. It also\ndemonstrates the limited capacity of the governments’ systems. The DRDIP seeks to enhance the\ninvestments in the host areas and communities and to strengthen the government institutions and\nsystems, putting in place enhanced absorption and utilization capabilities in these hitherto\nunderserved areas.\n\n39. **Harnessing synergy.** Cross-Global Practices collaboration is an important organizing\nprinciple for the proposed operation. Building on the experiences and good practices of related\nsectors and operations, the DRDIP seeks to maximize synergies across Global Practices and with\nother projects. Concretely, synergies will be sought with:\n\n- **Djibouti** . The DRDIP in Djibouti will be implemented in synergy with the Social Safety Net\n\nSecond Additional Financing Project and the Second Additional Financing for the Rural\nCommunity Development and Water Mobilization Project (PRODERMO). Under the\nDRDIP, construction of infrastructure will provide wage labor opportunities for young\npeople and women among the target communities. The DRDIP can usefully benefit from the\nsocial registry being developed with support from the Social Safety Net Project (SSNP). In\naddition, SSNP beneficiaries could be given priority to receive support for taking up\ntraditional and nontraditional livelihood activities under the DRDIP, provided they meet the\neligibility criteria. SSNP beneficiaries will be sensitized to productively invest the income\nthey earn from the livelihood activities supported by the regional project. Moreover,\nPRODERMO’s efforts to increase access to water in rural communities in Obock and to\nenhance their capacity to manage water and agropastoral resources using a participatory\napproach to community-based development will be furthered by the DRDIP’s investments in\ntraditional and nontraditional livelihoods to diversify income sources, enhance productivity\nand returns through value-chain investments, and support community-based organizations\nfocused on livelihoods to ensure the sustainability of project outcomes.\n\n- **Ethiopia** . The DRDIP in Ethiopia will be implemented in synergy with agricultural and\n\npastoral livelihoods and environmental amelioration with the third phase of the Pastoralist\nCommunity Development Project (PCDP-III), the Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience\nProject (RPLRP), the Sustainable Land Management Project (SLMP-II), the Productive\nSafety Net Program (PSNP-IV), and the Agricultural Growth Project (AGP-II).\n\n- **Uganda.** Synergies in Uganda include livelihoods and infrastructure investments, market\n\nlinkages, and environmental amelioration with the Northern Uganda Social Action Fund–III.\n\n- **Regional.** Synergies in the areas of mutual learning, and M&E, will be sought with the Great\n\nLakes Region: Improving Resilience and Social Cohesion of Displaced and Border\nCommunities Project; and with the RPLRP under implementation in Uganda, Ethiopia, and\nKenya with IGAD hosting a Regional Secretariat and coordinating policy harmonization and\n\n\n11\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "other regional aspects. Synergies on finding durable solutions for Congolese refugees in\nUganda will be sought with the Great Lakes Project.\n\n40. **Social cohesion.** Addressing competition and potential conflicts over social services and\neconomic infrastructure, limited livelihood opportunities, and degraded environmental and\nnatural resources through the three investment components is expected to ease tensions and\nfoster positive relationships between the host and refugee communities in the targeted areas of\nparticipating countries. The prioritization of investments addressing the drivers of conflict\nthrough an area-based approach could potentially offer “quick-wins” that benefit both host and\nrefugee communities, thus easing tensions, increasing social cohesion, and deepening integration\nbetween host communities and refugees. This approach also will strengthen the community’s\nconfidence in the project and its approach to mitigating potential conflicts.\n\n41. **Gender, youth, and sexual and gender-based violence.** To address gender inequality,\nyouth empowerment, and gender-based violence, linkages will be established with extensive\nanalytical work undertaken in the region, including learning initiatives supported through the\n[State and Peace-Building Fund and LOGiCA trust funds and those through operations such as](http://intranet.worldbank.org/WBSITE/INTRANET/UNITS/INTOPCS/0,,contentMDK:21820237~menuPK:5155328~pagePK:51455324~piPK:51455326~theSitePK:380832,00.html)\nthe Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender-based Violence and Women’s Health Project,\n[and the Global Platform for Sexual and Gender-based Violence in Fragile and Conflict-Affected](http://www.worldbank.org/fragilityandconflict/)\n[Situations. This work would respond directly to priorities articulated in IDA 17 highlighting](http://www.worldbank.org/fragilityandconflict/)\ngender and fragile and conflict-affected situations as special themes and, in particular,\ncommitments for increased attention to gender-based violence in fragile and conflict-affected\nsituations—a dedicated indicator in the IDA 17 Results Framework.\n\n42. **Regional Agency.** The US$5 million equivalent IDA grant to IGAD would support the\nestablishment of the Regional Secretariat for Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration to: (i)\nadvocate holistic regional responses to forced displacement and mixed migration that are\nsupported by data generated on displacement to influence interventions in refugee-hosting and\nrefugee-producing member states; (ii) support policy dialogue with member states and academic\nand research institutions on transitional/progressive solutions to displacement; (iii) generate\nevidence on innovative management of the impacts of forced displacement and mixed migration\nthrough research; (iv) build the capacities of countries and institutions in the HOA to\ninnovatively respond to forced displacement and mixed migration; (v) undertake knowledge\nmanagement and focused M&E of the DRDIP implementation; (vi) forge partnerships between\nhumanitarian and development actors in the HOA region to rethink the application of durable\nsolutions; and (vii) consolidate the capacity of IGAD to respond to forced displacement and\nmixed migration and be a strong actor, both regionally and internationally, in discussions\naffecting the HOA.\n\n43. Critical areas of interest for the Regional Secretariat would be: (i) examine policies and\npractices across refugee-hosting countries that enable work and livelihood opportunities for\nrefugees, which promotes self-reliance and the creation of a conducive socioeconomic ecosystem\nfor communities hosting refugees that would facilitate greater economic returns for both host\ncommunities and refugees; (ii) promote better regulations to facilitate ease of movement across\nHOA countries, including easier access to travel documents for mitigating irregular migration;\n(iii) explore strategies for governments to better manage migration and displacement situations;\nand (iv) address gender inequality, gender-based violence, and issues affecting youth at the\nregional level of the HOA.\n\n\n12\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**A** **Project Components**\n\n\n44. The DRDIP seeks to foster a fundamental shift in the way forced displacement is\naddressed in the HOA, including thinking about forced displacement impacts as a developmental\nchallenge as well as a humanitarian and security-related one; developing a government-led and\nimplemented development response that complements traditional humanitarian agencies; and\nforming a long-term response to systemic and structural constraints impeding development that\nare exacerbated by the presence of refugees in underserved refugee-hosting areas. Because the\nmajor impacts of forced displacement and categories of investment is comparable across the\nthree countries, the four major project components, described in detail below, will be\nimplemented in all three countries in a modular and sequenced fashion that is focused on\nmobilization and capacity support for communities and local governments and through an\nimplementation process responsive to community priorities. The communication, social\nmobilization, and participatory planning process will be complimented by awareness raising and\ncapacity support for communities, community institutions, and local governments as well as\ncapacity enhancement and institutional strengthening, including systems and process\ndevelopment for the implementing agencies. This will be followed by social, economic, and\nenvironmental investments that reflect community priorities. While Ethiopia will follow\ngeographical phasing, both Uganda and Djibouti will follow phasing of components for\nimplementation. Detailed phasing and sequencing has been integrated in the respective Project\nImplementation Manuals (PIMs) for each country.\n\n45. The DRDIP seeks to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the\npresence of refugees in host communities through interlinked technical and investment\ncomponents. **Component 1** will entail: (i) building capacity of local government units and\nimplementing agency staff in participatory planning processes; (ii) mobilizing communities and\nestablishing community institutions for planning, implementation, M&E, and oversight of\nsubprojects; and (iii) supporting investments in basic social services and economic infrastructure.\n**Component 2** will focus on: (i) environmental management, including technical advisory\nservices for implementation of environmental management activities through a labor intensive\npublic works mode; and (ii) access to energy sources for cooking and lighting, including\npotential public–private–people partnerships. **Component 3** will support: (i) identifying\nbeneficiaries and traditional and nontraditional livelihoods; (ii) forming community livelihood\ngroups and support-group management activities; and (iii) providing individuals and groups with\nneeded technical, business, market, and financial advisory services. The synergies between the\nthree investment components are expected to amplify impacts. For instance, market, storage, and\naccess roads created under Component 1 will enhance economic opportunities supported under\nComponent 3. Soil and water conservation efforts under Component 2 will support enhanced\nproductivity of traditional livelihoods supported under Component 3. Improved access to energy\nunder Component 2 will provide women the opportunity to participate in economic opportunities\nunder Component 3, with time saved and an improvement in their physical and mental\nwellbeing.\n\n46. **Component 4** will support national-, subnational-, and local-level project coordination\nactivities, including M&E and a management information system, fiduciary management,\ncommunication and citizen engagement, and compliance with environmental and social\nsafeguards. **Component 5** will consolidate regional efforts toward addressing displacement and\nmixed migration through policy dialogue and engagement, research, capacity support,\n\n\n13\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "knowledge management, and partnership functions that will then support innovative responses to\ndisplacement and mixed migration.\n\n\n**Component 1: Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure (US$85 million)**\n\n\n47. Refugee-hosting areas in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda are characterized by significant\ndevelopment deficits, including low human capital and limited access to basic social services and\neconomic infrastructure. The service-delivery capacity of local authorities in the three countries\nis also weak. Component 1 aims to improve access to basic social services and economic\ninfrastructure and improve the service-delivery capacity of local authorities at the target\nsubnational and local levels by financing community and strategic investments as well as\ncapacity-support initiatives. Community investments will be matched by community\ncontributions, both in cash and in kind (time, materials, and labor). The process will follow a\ncommunity-driven development approach.\n\n48. _**Subcomponent 1(a): Community Investment Fund (US$78 million).**_ Subcomponent\n1(a) seeks to improve community access to basic social services and economic infrastructure by\nproviding investment funds that, together with community contributions, will expand and\nimprove service delivery and build infrastructure for local development. Investments will be\nidentified, prioritized, implemented, and monitored by beneficiary communities. Potential\ninvestments (subprojects) include the construction, upgrading, rehabilitation, and/or expansion of\nbasic social services, such as education, water supply, human health, and veterinary care; and\neconomic infrastructure such as rural roads, market structures, and storage facilities. The target\ncommunity, with guidance from local government, will identify and prioritize the specific social\nservices and economic infrastructure to be funded under this subcomponent through the\ncommunity-driven development approach. Only those subprojects that are currently\nfunctioning—that can cover their operating costs and have staff—and those who have a budget\nfor staff and materials provided by their respective administration will be supported, ensuring the\nsustainability of the interventions. Subcomponent 1(a) will also support strategic investments\nthat are larger in scope and impact than typical community-level investments (subprojects) and\nthat will serve a cluster of project beneficiary communities. These investments will not exceed\n20 percent of the total budget for community investments; will be identified through the\ncommunity prioritization process; and when possible, will employ local labor during\nconstruction, especially women and youth. Local governments will be responsible for operation\nand maintenance. The project will make efforts to establish an information and communication\ntechnology platform composed of a network of mobile phones and applications that will link\nbeneficiaries and those managing the fund to a web-enabled dashboard. The platform will be\nused to upload data on investments and implementation status on a close-to-real-time basis. The\nprocess for the planning, implementation, and monitoring of Subcomponent 1(a) is explained in\ndetail in the PIM for each participating country.\n\n\n49. _**Subcomponent 1(b): Capacity Support for Local Planning and Decentralized Service**_\n_**Delivery (US$7 million).**_ Subcomponent 1(b) will seek to improve the service-delivery capacity\nof local-level government authorities. It will support capacity support interventions for local\ngovernment authorities and local implementing institutions in the areas of community-driven\nplanning process, local development management, service-delivery capacities enhancement,\nmainstreaming of project interventions with government development planning and budgeting\nprocess, coordination of potential development stakeholders at local-level and community-level\n\n\n14\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "development learning. Capacity support activities to be financed under the project, have been\ndetailed in the PIMs, including: (i) supplying critically needed items such as office equipment\nand facilities, field gear, vehicles, and technical resources; (ii) preparing, printing, and\ndissemination of technical training materials; (iii) training and development of knowledge and\nskills at all levels, including for technical staff and host communities; and (iv) experience\nsharing. The project will also support technical assistance to reinforce the capacity of specialized\nimplementing agencies, including the recruitment of national and international technical\nassistance for the planning, engineering design, procurement, construction management, and\ntechnical monitoring of physical investments.\n\n\n**Component 2: Sustainable Environmental Management (US$33.6 million)**\n\n\n50. Refugee-hosting areas face a severe degradation of their environmental and natural\nresources, including deforestation and the devastation of agricultural and range lands. The\ncontinued presence and influx of refugees exacerbates already severe environmental conditions,\nturning localities into fragile ecosystems. Component 2 aims to ensure that environmental and\nnatural resources are carefully and sustainably managed so they can support current and future\nneeds and livelihoods. The implementation of demand- and supply-side interventions will be\nsupported by the component. Supply-side interventions will support and enhance sustainable\nenvironmental and ecosystem services, including integrated natural resources management and\nsmall-, micro- and household-scale irrigation schemes. Alternative energy sources will aim to\nreduce unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, including risk mitigation and other\nchallenges faced by crisis-affected host communities. Demand-side interventions will seek to\naddress gender issues by reducing drudgery in terms of time and energy spent by women and\ngirls collecting wood for fuel, lowering their exposure to risk of violence while collecting it, and\nimproving health and indoor air pollution through the use of cleaner fuels and fuel-saving\ncooking technologies. These aspects have been detailed in the individual PIM for each country.\n\n\n51. _**Subcomponent 2(a): Integrated Natural Resources Management (US$26.8 million).**_\nSubcomponent 2(a) intends to enhance the productivity of environmental and natural resources,\nincluding arresting the degradation of fragile ecosystems in forest, range, and agricultural lands.\nIt would support soil and water conservation through biological and physical activities on\nindividual farms and communal lands, including the construction of soil bunds, stone bunds,\nartificial waterways, cut-off drains, check dams (gully rehabilitation), bench terraces, hillside\nterraces, trenches, area closures, planting of multipurpose trees, and groundwater recharge\ninterventions. The subcomponent will enhance irrigation water use and management, thereby\nincreasing irrigated land, production, and productivity for host communities. Key activities to be\nsupported include the construction, rehabilitation, or improvement of existing traditional and\nmodern small-, micro- and household-scale irrigation schemes. Where appropriate, these\nactivities will be implemented in a labor-intensive public works mode, and specific efforts will\nbe made to integrate women—not only into the labor opportunities but also as beneficiaries of\nthe activities. The use of remote sensor technologies installed on water pumps at the farm level\nto monitor water use and inform water management decisions could be considered. Capacitybuilding activities that enhance the implementation of integrated natural resources management\nand small-scale irrigation development and management will be supported in each participating\ncountry, with technical assistance to service providers at multiple levels and support to\ncommunities provided.\n\n\n15\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "52. _**Subcomponent 2(b): Access to Energy (US$6.8 million)**_ . Subcomponent 2(b) seeks to\nimprove the host communities’ access to energy by promoting the better use of energy resources\nand increasing access to alternative sources of energy. Support will be given to interventions that\naddress the host communities’ energy requirements, such as domestic cooking and lighting;\nsocial services, such as schools and health services; and productive activities, including lighting\nfor small shops and businesses and for manufacturing and processing. Household cooking is\ncurrently based on firewood and charcoal. To address this concern, improved cooking devices\nwill be introduced with appropriate community consultations about methods of cooking and\nbaking and what types of firewood are locally available. Training would be provided on the use\nof the new devices, including the preparation of fuel. Attention would be given to monitoring\nuse, regular maintenance, and repairs. Solar lanterns and lamps are among the options for\nmeeting home and street lighting as well as mobile phone charging needs. Annex 3 provides\nmore detail on these planned efforts. Establishing connections to grids—where possible—and\noff-grid decentralized energy supplies that are based on renewables and diesel engines will be\nexplored in cooperation with other projects (World Bank and other funding sources) for meeting\nthe above-mentioned and other productive energy uses.\n\n\n**Component 3: Livelihoods Program (US$36.85 million)**\n\n53. Refugee-hosting communities derive their incomes from traditional livelihoods, such as\nagriculture, fisheries, pastoralism, and agropastoralism; and/or from nontraditional livelihoods,\nsuch as skills-based jobs, service enterprises, and small businesses. Both types are characterized\nby low-level technologies and skills, resulting in inherent low productivity. The lives and\nlivelihoods of people in target communities are impoverished, and their incomes levels are low\nand unsustainable. Component 3 seeks to improve livelihoods and increase the incomes of\nrefugee-hosting communities based on a market-system approach, [15] presented in more detail in\nfigure 3.1 and Annex 3.\n\n\n**Figure 3.1. Market System and the Market Players**\n\n\n15 “The central idea is that the poor are dependent on market systems for their livelihoods. Therefore changing those market systems to work more\neffectively and sustainably for the poor will improve their livelihoods and consequently reduce poverty” (DCED—The Donor Committee for\nEnterprise Development: http://www.enterprise-development.org/page/m4p#OverviewandStrategy).\n\n\n16\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "_Source: Building Economic Resilience among the Poor, DAI (2013)_\n\n\n54. Key elements to consider with regard to the economic ecosystem include informal\nenterprises and firms; the nascent presence of the private sector; other non-World Bank efforts;\nand potential innovations for scale-up. It will support interventions aimed at improving the\nproductivity of traditional and nontraditional livelihoods. Both livelihood types will be informed\nby a detailed technical, behavioral, and market-performance assessment to increase production,\nimprove market interconnections, adopt best practices (for traditional livelihoods), and impart\nskills for increased employability and enterprise development and to promote other incomegenerating activities for nontraditional livelihoods. The component will strengthen existing\ncommunity-based organizations and support the formation of new ones.\n\n\n55. _**Subcomponent 3(a): Support to Traditional and Nontraditional Livelihoods (US$31.4**_\n_**million)**_ . Subcomponent 3(a) aims to increase the production and productivity of agriculture\n(crops and livestock), pastoralism (livestock), agropastoralism (crop and livestock) and fisheries,\nand to commercialize livelihood activities for improved incomes, employment, and self-reliance\namong refugees. Intervention areas were identified based on key stakeholder and community\nconsultations, but an in-depth technical and market system assessment will inform\nimplementation. Based on these assessments, combined with the subnational and local potential\nand depending on what the traditional forms of livelihood are, support will be provided to key\nactivities, including improving production practices; accessing technology, equipment, storage,\nprocessing infrastructure, and financing; and accessing input and output markets. Women are\n\n\n17\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "expected to be major beneficiaries under the component, and specific efforts will be put in place\nto tailor approaches to enhance their participation and the benefits they receive.\n\n56. Nontraditional livelihoods will be identified based on a market assessment to provide\nskills training for increased employability and enterprise development and to promote other\nincome-generating activities. Based on key stakeholder consultations, a number of livelihood\noptions were identified, but market system assessments will inform implementation. The\nproposed interventions will be informed by lessons learned from existing projects and will build\non the experience of implementing agencies, tailored to country contexts. The subcomponent\nwill follow a process-driven approach for systematic implementation with three phases: (i)\npreparatory; (ii) livelihood business plan preparation, subproject generation, and approval; and\n(iii) subproject implementation, follow-up mentoring, and commissioning (see Annex 3 and\ncountry PIM). The subcomponent will also support innovations that could include technological,\ninstitutional, and process innovations to be determined during implementation. Support programs\nfor youth and women in technological innovations like digital commerce, as well as in\ninformation technology-enabled services that require computer/digital literacy, could support\nmodern and salaried jobs. The relevant department ministry for each country will support the\nimplementation of the livelihood activities.\n\n\n57. _**Subcomponent 3(b): Capacity Support of Community-Based Organizations for**_\n_**Livelihoods (US$5.45 million)**_ . Subcomponent 3(b) is intended to improve the service-delivery\ncapacity of farmer, pastoral, or agropastoral organizations, including community-based\norganizations. Establishing and building the capacity of community-based organizations is\ncentral to the project’s CDD approach to implementation and for the sustainability of project\ninvestments. Community-based organizations involved in livelihoods promotion, including\nfarmer organizations, cooperatives, and common-interest groups, will receive training in group\nmanagement, savings, financial literacy, and bookkeeping. They will be encouraged to practice\nregular meetings, savings, and inter-loaning, timely repayment, and up-to-date accounting. The\ntraditional and nontraditional livelihood activities will be implemented by common-interest\ngroups that will receive capacity support on group management, enterprise selection, livelihood\nbusiness plan preparation, procurement management, and technical and computer/digital skills.\nGender training programs will receive specific attention to enhance livelihood opportunities for\nwomen, promote conflict resolution, and address forms of gender-based violence such as\nintimate partner violence with changes in women’s roles. Local administration technical\ncommittees and/or facilitators will undertake these efforts.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management and M&E (US$14.55 million).**\n\n\n58. Project management and implementation will follow a decentralized approach, using\nexisting government structures at the national, subnational, and local levels and local-level\ncommunity institutions to be established and/or strengthened. The objectives of this component\nare to ensure enhanced and effective project management, coordination, and implementation and\nto support the design of the project’s M&E system, which will be described in detail in the M&E\nmanual. The component will support the establishment and/or strengthening of institutions at\nmultiple levels with different roles and responsibilities, including oversight, coordination, and\ntechnical bodies. Steering and technical committees will be established at the national,\nsubnational, and local levels. Project Coordination Units (PCUs) will be established at the\nnational, subnational, and local levels in Ethiopia; a project implementation team will be\n\n\n18\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "established within the _Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social_ (Djiboutian Social\nDevelopment Agency, ADDS) in Djibouti; and a Project Implementation Support Team (PIST)\nwill be established at the national level in Uganda. Both will be adequately staffed with technical\nexperts recruited through a competitive process. The staff will serve as coordinators and\nfacilitators. The project will build on existing community-level structures, such as community\ndevelopment committees, and will establish new local-level institutions as needed, including\ncommunity facilitation teams, community project management committees, community\nprocurement committees, and social audit committees.\n\n59. The component will support the design of the project’s management information system\nfor monitoring inputs, outputs, and processes; the evaluation of outcome and impacts;\nenvironmental and social safeguard monitoring; and participatory M&E and internal learning.\nM&E activities will include regular monitoring of the progress and performance of\nimplementation; monitoring of the independent process, including regular assessments of\ncommunity-level planning and a review of the effectiveness and quality of capacity-building\nefforts; outcome and impact evaluations at baseline, mid-term, and end-of-project; and annual\nthematic studies. The project’s Results Framework (Annex 1) will be used as a basis for\nreporting progress against indicators, including progress toward achieving the PDO and\nimplementation progress. The project will consider the use of mobile technologies to increase the\nreach and frequency of data capturing at the local level and aggregating it in a platform that\ncould serve as a dashboard. Such a tool would provide near real-time monitoring and the ability\nto visualize and/or geo-localize activities supported by the project in the three countries.\n\n\n**Component 5: Regional Support for Coordination, Capacity and Knowledge (US$5**\n**million).**\n\n\n60. The key objective of this component is to support the establishment of the Regional\nSecretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration, primarily for the HOA, but with\nrelevant linkages to the Great Lakes Initiative. The Secretariat will: (i) spearhead the\nadvancement of the development approach to displacement in the HOA; (ii) facilitate knowledge\ncreation in partnership with relevant think tanks and/or universities in the three project countries\nof Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda and the HOA; emerging from the implementation of the\nDRDIP with respect to development solutions to forced displacement; (iii) ensure annual\nlearning and sharing workshops for all the HOA countries; and (iv) contribute to a better\nunderstanding of the nexus between socioeconomic development, forced displacement, and\nmixed migration in the HOA by commissioning studies and/or focused research.\n\n61. The Regional Secretariat will be anchored in IGAD, a regional organization that has\nconvening powers and a political mandate for the eight HOA countries and which is in a suitable\nposition to initiate regional conversations about forced displacement and mixed migration. In\naddition to commissioning research, generating knowledge, capturing lessons, and coordinating\nsharing and learning in the project countries and at the regional level, the Regional Secretariat\nwill host a regional project steering committee to be constituted by representatives from the\nnational steering committees for each project country. The regional project steering committee\nwill provide oversight of the implementation of the regional program and will guide, advise, and\nsupport a regional policy dialogue.\n\n62. Finally, the Regional Secretariat will work toward building the capacities of the\nexecuting agencies on the development approach to displacement in the three project countries.\n\n\n19\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management information system",
+ "confidence": 0.9862926006317139,
+ "start": 117,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring inputs, outputs, and processes",
+ "confidence": 0.9374532103538513,
+ "start": 121,
+ "end": 128
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual\nthematic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.87941575050354,
+ "start": 204,
+ "end": 207
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "reporting progress against indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.7894382476806641,
+ "start": 225,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "three countries",
+ "confidence": 0.8134109377861023,
+ "start": 299,
+ "end": 301
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.7502585649490356,
+ "start": 425,
+ "end": 426
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "development solutions to forced displacement",
+ "confidence": 0.679364800453186,
+ "start": 429,
+ "end": 434
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.7699257731437683,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "studies",
+ "confidence": 0.5328763723373413,
+ "start": 477,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.8713643550872803,
+ "start": 474,
+ "end": 475
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regional program",
+ "confidence": 0.5180864930152893,
+ "start": 594,
+ "end": 596
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "This will ensure harmonization and create standards for future projects that are similar. The\ndetails of the proposed trainings, study tours, and other activities of the Regional Secretariat are\nexplained in detail in the PIM prepared by IGAD.\n\n\n**B** **Project Financing**\n\n\n63. The DRDIP would be financed through investment project financing (IPF) for the\nparticipating countries as follows: US$20 million equivalent for Djibouti; US$100 million\nequivalent for Ethiopia; and US$50 million equivalent for Uganda. A US$5 million equivalent\nIDA Grant will be provided to IGAD to host the Regional Secretariat on Forced Displacement\nand Mixed Migration and to coordinate a regional knowledge generation, dissemination, and\nlearning agenda. The total estimated DRDIP costs are based on an IDA allocation (national\nallocations and a grant for regional coordination activities) for an overall estimated budget of\nUS$175 million over a five-year period. The total project cost includes a total Regional IDA\nenvelope of US$98 million equivalent with US$18 million equivalent from Regional IDA\nMENA and US$80 million equivalent from Regional IDA AFR as part of the MENA-AFR\nRegional collaboration. Total project costs and associated financing are presented in table 3.1.\n\n\n**Table 3.1 Project Financing**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Project Components|Project Cost (US$ million)|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Project Components**|**Djibouti**|**Ethiopia**|**Uganda**|**IGAD**|**Total IDA**
**Financing**|**% **|\n|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|**1. Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|\n|1(a) Community Investment Fund|10.4|40.1|27.5||78.0||\n|1 (b) Capacity Support for Local Planning
and Decentralized Service Delivery|0.1|4.4|2.5||7.0||\n|**Subtotal**|**10.5**|**44.5**|**30**|**0 **|**85.0**|**48.6**|\n|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|**2. Sustainable Environmental Management**|\n|2(a) Integrated Natural Resources
Management|2.3|18|6.5||26.8||\n|2(b) Access to Energy|1.8|3|2||6.8||\n|**Subtotal**|**4.10**|**21**|**8.5**|**0 **|**33.6**|**19.2**|\n|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|**3. Livelihoods Program**|\n|3(a) Support to Traditional and
Nontraditional Livelihoods|0.6|24.3|6.5||31.4||\n|3(b) Capacity Support for Community-Based
Organizations for Livelihoods|1.5|2.7|1.25||5.45||\n|**Subtotal**|**2.1**|**27**|**7.75**|**0 **|**36.85**|**21.1**|\n|**4 Project Management and M&E**|**3.3**|**7.5**|**3.75**||**14.55**|**8.3**|\n|**5. Regional Support for Coordination,**
**Capacity, and Knowledge**|**0 **|**0 **|**0 **|**5 **|**5 **|**2.9**|\n|**Total project cost**|**20**|**100**|**50**|**5 **|**175**|**100**|\n\n\n64. The DRDIP is consistent with the World Bank’s proposed response to addressing forced\ndisplacement by addressing the regional spill-over effect of conflict, which can be termed the\n“public bad” through a development response that seeks to support the host communities in\novercoming the shocks and impacts of refugees. The DRDIP has been prepared in close\n\n\n20\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "collaboration with the United Nations (UN) agencies that are responsible for the welfare of\nrefugees. Close collaboration is also being forged with UN agencies to strengthen\ncomplementarity in displacement responses through more effective and efficient developmental\ninterventions that are better aligned with the government priorities and plans. Because forced\ndisplacement is a regional challenge for HOA, the DRDIP strongly emphasizes knowledge\ngeneration and learning and sharing to enable the identification of viable and scalable\ninterventions in participating and HOA member countries and to facilitate easier and timely\nsharing and support for quick implementation.\n\n65. The four eligibility criteria to access regional IDA funding for the proposed operation are\nfully satisfied under the operation:\n\n(i) Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda—the DRDIP countries—are part of the HOA and will\n\nparticipate in achieving the project’s objectives.\n\n(ii) The three project countries are all affected by forced displacement and mixed migration.\n\nProposed interventions will mitigate the negative effects that forced displacement has on\nhost communities and might prevent local conflicts from arising between refugees and\nhosts. Improved social services and livelihoods for refugees will secure their human\ncapital and self-reliance, allowing them to contribute to the local development of their host\ncountries and of their countries of origin upon their return. These two aspects have clear\npositive spillover effects beyond country boundaries and generate positive externalities\nacross countries that are hosting or generating refugees.\n\n(iii) There is clear evidence of project ownership at the regional and national levels in the three\n\nproject countries that are borrowing to address displacement-related issues, demonstrating\na strong regional and national commitment to the implementation of the DRDIP.\n\n(iv) The DRDIP will enhance the harmonization of policies and practices related to forced\n\ndisplacement and mixed migration across HOA countries through the stewardship of\nregional agencies like IGAD because laws and regulations in the project countries\nregarding refugees fall along a continuum of allowing or disallowing refugees freedom of\nmovement, the right to work, and property ownership rights, which define the options for\ndurable solutions.\n\n66. IGAD, a regional economic community, is well equipped to coordinate the regional\nefforts required to facilitate the research, knowledge-generation, and learning agenda and to\nharmonize refugee laws and policies across the three participating countries as well as across its\neight member countries. IGAD is already working on two World Bank-financed regional\nprojects: the Regional HIV/AIDS Partnership Program Support Project (P104523) and the\nRegional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience Project (P129408). The proposed grant to IGAD also\nmeets the six eligibility criteria to access a regional IDA grant:\n\n(i) IGAD has the legal status and fiduciary capacity to receive grant funding and the legal\n\nauthority to carry out the financed activities;\n\n(ii) IGAD does not meet eligibility requirements to take on an IDA credit because it does not\n\ngenerate revenue and is not in a position to repay the credit;\n\n(iii)The costs and benefits are not easily allocated to national programs due to the regional\n\nnature of the activities to be financed with the IDA grant;\n\n\n21\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "(iv)The activities are related to coordinated interventions to provide regional public goods in\n\nthat they are designed to contribute to regional knowledge and results-generating\nprograms, principally in the areas of forced displacement and the strengthening of IGAD\ncapacity to deliver its mandate on regional peace, security, and development;\n\n(v) Grant cofinancing is not readily available or sufficient for the activity from other\n\ndevelopment partners, whose support to IGAD is limited to small amounts in selected\nareas; and\n\n(vi)The regional entity is associated with an IDA-funded regional operation with which three\n\nout of its eight member states are involved. The project also conforms to the Africa\nRegion’s selection criteria for regional operations in Africa, including strategic relevance,\nregional solutions, quality, and partnership.\n\n\n**C** **Series of Projects: Objectives and Phases**\n\n\n67. The DRDIP is being processed as a Series of Projects (SOP) because each of the three\nDRDIP countries is contending with displacement impacts and their projects have similar\ncomponents, even though they are independent of each other. The three credits and the grant are\nbeing delivered as a single package. However, for Djibouti, Uganda, and Ethiopia, this project is\nseen as the first phase of a longer-term engagement to address the significant impacts of the\nrefugee presence on host communities: Ethiopia hosts the most refugees in Africa, Uganda has a\nvery progressive refugee policy and is a favored asylum destination, and Djibouti has a major\nproblem with flows of migrants alongside the refugees. The implementation experience, results,\nand learning from the proposed project could potentially be intensified or deepened in the\ntargeted areas, or could expand to other refugee-hosting districts in Uganda and other countries\nin the region. The SOP will allow for Additional Financing for Djibouti, Uganda, and Ethiopia as\npart of IDA 18 for intensification and expansion of interventions.\n\n68. Only three of the eight HOA countries are participating in the proposed regional\noperation. The SOP allows for other countries in the HOA to opt into the program at a later date,\naccording to their needs and specific requirements, through IDA financing for Kenya and South\nSudan and through trust funds [16] for Somalia, Sudan, and Eritrea. The main requirement for other\ncountries in the HOA being able to participate in the SOP is that they are hosting refugees in a\nprotracted situation.\n\n\n**D** **Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design**\n\n\n69. The proposed regional operation incorporates key lessons learned with respect to\naddressing forced displacement at a global level. It benefits from the experiences of relevant\nprojects under implementation in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda; from the lessons learned from\nmulti-sectoral and country-specific projects or those that have weak institutional capacity\nenvironments; and from other regional projects currently active in the HOA.\n\n70. Emerging international experience regarding developmental interventions to address the\nimpact of forced displacement that have informed this project design include the following:\n\n\n16Somalia, Sudan, and Eritrea are currently in nonaccrual status with IDA and would therefore not be able to receive IDA financing or participate\nin the project, before a resolution of their arrears situation with IDA and other official creditors. Therefore, for these countries, trust funds through\nan MDTF would be needed.\n\n\n22\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": " - _A majority of the HOA countries have relatively progressive and advanced legal_\n\n_frameworks in support of displaced people, but translating this into government policy_\n_and programs is highly varied._ Africa is the only continent to further the implementation\nof the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement through the Kampala Convention\nand all HOA countries are signatories. While Uganda has progressive refugee laws and\npolicies and programs promoting self-reliance among refugees in the context of their host\ncommunities, other countries are still exercising an encampment policy.\n\n - _In a context of weak national systems, providing parallel service delivery in refugee-_\n\n_hosting countries as part of a humanitarian response is unsustainable, inefficient, and_\n_costly._ A humanitarian response to forced displacement often includes the creation of\nparallel service-delivery systems with little synergy with mainstream government\nprovisioning, often leading to duplication of infrastructure, low quality of services, and\npoor outcomes for both refugee and host communities. It is also unsustainable over the\nmedium to long term.\n\n - _A development approach must invest in and promote jobs, livelihood opportunities, and_\n\n_wealth creation for the host communities and refugees to address the underlying poverty_\n_in and vulnerability of host communities, which is further exacerbated by the presence of_\n_refugees._ Investments are needed in terms of economic assets and infrastructure;\ncommunity-based institutions; skills for productive self-employment; technology; and\nmarket interactions to enhance economic opportunities for host communities and\nrefugees, improve incomes, increase self-reliance, and mitigate conflict.\n\n - _A comprehensive project with a simple and focused design developed with local_\n\n_participation and adjusted to local capacity is more effective than reallocating resources_\n_from existing projects._ The DRDIP builds on existing experiences and tested models in\nproviding a development response to displacement impacts instead of shifting resources\nfrom existing programs, which can hasten the response but is not comprehensive.\n\n - _There is an urgent need to strengthen the data and evidence base regarding the_\n\n_development challenges and impacts of forced displacement as well as potential_\n_solutions._ Given the limited quantitative and qualitative evidence on approaches and\nstrategies that would be effective in addressing displacement impacts, the DRDIP has a\ndedicated structure and resources to ensure that studies, assessments, and surveys on\nspecific interventions are undertaken to monitor how project interventions mitigate\nexisting vulnerabilities within a hosting population of displaced persons.\n\n71. Key experiences from implementing a CDD approach in environments with a low level\nof institutional capacity for the delivery of services, improving community resilience, and\nmanaging natural resources that have informed project design are:\n\n - _Impacted communities are best suited to identify their needs and priorities, to implement_\n\n_subprojects, and to manage investments._ The local communities that are hosting refugees\nare better able to plan for and effectively implement investment subprojects. However,\nthe process of mobilization and planning must be inclusive and participatory to ensure\nthat all social groups, including women, youth, and pastoralists (where present), are\ninvolved. Clear criteria are needed for identifying, prioritizing, and selecting investments\nand beneficiaries to ensure transparency and ownership [17] . A sensitive facilitation process\n\n\n17 World Bank. 2013. “Designing Community-Driven Development Operations in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations. Lessons from a\nStocktaking.” World Bank, Washington, D.C\n\n\n23\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "is crucial to ensure that the voices of disadvantaged groups are expressed and to prevent\nelite capture. Planning should be led by local governments, with the involvement of key\nstakeholders and taking into account ongoing and proposed projects and programs to\navoid duplication, to foster synergies and to ensure downward accountability to the\ncommunities.\n\n - _Rapid results must be appropriately matched with realism of project delivery and_\n\n_institutional strengthening to foster more sustainable and cost-effective delivery of_\n_development interventions over the medium and long term._ The project areas are\nunderserved, with significant development deficiencies and limited implementation\nexperience or capacity. The initial phase of community mobilization and subproject\nidentification and preparation will need adequate time. This phase will be complemented\nby capacity building of communities and local governments through training, facilitation,\nand resources for technical inputs, financial management, procurement, and\naccountability measures. The subsequent phase will witness rapid and scaled-up\nimplementation and larger disbursements.\n\n - _Key entry points for livelihood support, natural resource management, and/or_\n\n_infrastructure can potentially deliver resilience support at the community level that is_\n_necessary for addressing climate change adaptation and increasing disaster risk_ _[18]_ _._ The\nCDD approach adopted under the project has the potential to provide communities with a\nbroad platform for empowerment and poverty reduction in addition to a diverse range of\nrisk management for climate change and greater reliance on investments under the\nsustainable environment management component, making use of local knowledge and\nexpertise for more effective outcomes.\n\n - _Establishing and strengthening social contracts between subnational governments and_\n\n_communities are means and ends toward the goal of mainstreaming social, economic,_\n_and infrastructure aspects of underserved refugee-hosting areas._ The state’s limited\ncapacity is reflected in poor service delivery and inadequate infrastructure in the refugeehosting areas. The project is focused on working through existing local government\nstructures, sensitizing leadership, training frontline staff, strengthening systems and\nprocesses, and, importantly, responding to community priorities during and after the\nproject.\n\n - _A holistic approach is needed to address gender issues._ Women’s participation in the\n\nproject’s processes is constrained by social structures and cultural norms. Community\nmobilization, consultations, trainings, institution building, and leadership are needed to\ntackle the issue. Project interventions will address the social, economic, infrastructure,\nand protection needs of women, particularly with regard to sexual- and gender-based\nviolence. For example, fifty percent of the beneficiaries of the livelihood program will be\nwomen, and improved access to energy through efficient fuels and cooking devices will\nlessen women’s exposure to indoor air pollution, reduce the risk of sexual- and genderbased violence, and increase their available time for economic activities.\n\n\n18 Arnold, Margaret, Robin Mearns, Kaori Oshima, and Vivek Prasad. 2014. “Climate and Disaster Resilience: The Role for Community-Driven\nDevelopment.” Social Development Department. World Bank, Washington, D.C.\n\n\n24\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "# **IV IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n**A** **Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n72. The institutional arrangements for implementation, technical assistance, and oversight for\neach of the participating countries follows (see Annex 3 for details). Table 4.1 lists the agencies\nresponsible for the project in each country.\n\n73. At the regional level, IGAD will set up the Regional Secretariat for Forced Displacement\nand Mixed Migration as part of the migration program of the health and social development\nsector based in Nairobi, building on the Regional Migration Program, and in Djibouti, with\noverall financial management and procurement responsibility under the IGAD administration in\nDjibouti.\n\n\n\n**Table 4.1 National-Level Ministries and Executing Agencies Responsible for the Project**\n**Country** **Lead Ministry** **Executing Agency**\n**Djibouti** Ministry of Economy and Finance _Agence Djiboutienne de Développement_\n(coordination) and National Solidarity _Social_ (Djiboutian Social Development\nSecretariat (technical) Agency, ADDS)\n\n\n\n**Djibouti** Ministry of Economy and Finance _Agence Djiboutienne de Développement_\n(coordination) and National Solidarity _Social_ (Djiboutian Social Development\nSecretariat (technical) Agency, ADDS)\n\n**Ethiopia** Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Emerging Regions Coordination\nResources Directorate\n\n\n\n**Ethiopia** Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Emerging Regions Coordination\nResources Directorate\n\n**Uganda** Office of the Prime Minister Department of Refugees\n\n\n\n74. Steering and technical committees will be established at the regional, national,\nsubnational, and local implementation levels. Table 4.2 details their roles and responsibilities.\n\n\n\n**Table 4.2. Key Project-Related Institutions and Their Roles and Responsibilities**\n**Institution** **Membership** **Roles and Responsibilities**\nProject Regional Representatives of national steering Providing oversight of implementation\nSteering Committee committees from each project of the regional program; guide, advice,\n(within IGAD) country and support knowledge generation and\n\n\n\nProject Regional Representatives of national steering Providing oversight of implementation\nSteering Committee committees from each project of the regional program; guide, advice,\n(within IGAD) country and support knowledge generation and\n\nlearning as well as regional policy\ndialogue and harmonization.\nSteering Committee Chaired by head of the responsible Strategic guidance and oversight of\n(at the national/federal, lead ministry or his/her designee at project management; coordination; and\nsubnational [19], and each level with members from implementation, including approving\nlocal levels) relevant implementing agencies and the annual work plan and budget of the\n\n\n\nRepresentatives of national steering\ncommittees from each project\ncountry\n\n\n\nStrategic guidance and oversight of\nproject management; coordination; and\nimplementation, including approving\nthe annual work plan and budget of the\nrelevant implementation level.\n\n\n\nTechnical Committee\n(at the national/federal,\nsubnational, and local\nlevels)\n\n\n\nTechnical Committee Chaired by head of the executive Technical support to the steering\n(at the national/federal, agency and constituted by technical committee at the relevant level,\nsubnational, and local experts drawn from relevant including a technical review of the\nlevels) departments and with sector annual work plan and budget and issues\n\nexpertise that require the attention and decision\n\nof the steering committee resulting from\nimplementation at the relevant level.\nProject coordination Project coordinator and team of Responsible for the overall\n\n\n\nChaired by head of the responsible\nlead ministry or his/her designee at\neach level with members from\nrelevant implementing agencies and\nrelevant stakeholders, including\ndevelopment and humanitarian\nagencies and organizations\n\nChaired by head of the executive\nagency and constituted by technical\nexperts drawn from relevant\ndepartments and with sector\nexpertise\n\n\n\n19 Subnational means for Ethiopia – Regional Governments, Uganda – District Governments, and Djibouti- Regional Governments.\n\n\n25\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Regional Migration Program",
+ "confidence": 0.6400808691978455,
+ "start": 103,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.6540094017982483,
+ "start": 361,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "project\ncountry",
+ "confidence": 0.6935331225395203,
+ "start": 485,
+ "end": 487
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Representatives of national steering\ncommittees",
+ "confidence": 0.5022897124290466,
+ "start": 478,
+ "end": 483
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Subnational means",
+ "confidence": 0.5679970979690552,
+ "start": 671,
+ "end": 673
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "unit (at the\nnational/federal,\nsubnational, and local\nlevels) in Ethiopia;\nproject implementation\nteam in ADDS in\nDjibouti; and IGAD\nRegional Secretariat\nand PIST in the Office\nof the Prime Minister\nin Uganda.\n\n\n\ntechnical experts at the national\nlevel across all three countries but\nalso Focal Point with expertise in\nprocurement, financial\nmanagement, and safeguards at the\nsubnational level; and a coordinator\nof monitoring and evaluation and\nfinance at the local level in Ethiopia\nand Djibouti.\n\n\n\nmanagement and coordination of\nproject, including consolidation of\nannual work plans and the budget,\nfiduciary management, safeguard\ncompliance, communications,\nmonitoring and evaluation, reporting,\nliaison with project implementing\nentities and subnational PCUs, capacity\nbuilding, supervision and mobilization,\nand addressing implementation\nbottlenecks as they arise.\n\n\n\n75. A national PCU will be established in Ethiopia, a project implementation team in\nDjibouti and IGAD, and a PIST in Uganda; under the auspices of the respective executing\nagencies. In addition to project funds, they will be responsible for managing the project at the\nnational level, including financial, procurement, and safeguard management as well as\nmonitoring and evaluation in accordance with World Bank guidelines and procedures; finalizing\nthe national PIM; and producing national progress reports on the project. In addition, subnational\nand local-level PCUs and project implementation teams will be established at the appropriate\nlevel.\n\n76. The national PCU, the project implementation team, and the PIST will be headed by\nproject coordinators, along with a core team of specialists in procurement, financial\nmanagement, and monitoring and evaluation. They will be supported by a team of specialists in\ninfrastructure, livelihoods, and social and environmental safeguards, among others, to be\nsupported under IDA financing. Additional specialists will be contracted based on individual\ncountry requirements under IDA financing. An assessment will be conducted of the existing\ncapacities, human resources, infrastructure, systems, and processes for each of the executing\nagencies, and based on its findings, the capacities will be harnessed for project purposes. The\nIGAD project implementation team will include a program coordinator and a core team of\nspecialists in financial management, procurement, and knowledge management and results.\n\n77. Detailed PIMs have been prepared for the three participating countries, with operational\ndetails at the national, subnational, and local levels, and with arrangements for the\nimplementation of the investment components, the technical activities, the environmental and\nsocial safeguard management, monitoring and evaluation, financial management, and\nprocurement procedures. For each participating country, dated legal covenants include the\nappointment of an internal and an external auditor.\n\n\n**B** **Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n78. The DRDIP will be implemented at the community level with necessary oversight and\ntechnical support at the national, subnational, and local levels. M&E capacities will be ensured at\nthe national, subnational, and local levels for the collection, organization, and analysis of projectrelated data. The main instrument for M&E under the DRDIP will be the Results Framework\n(Annex 1). The indicators are the same for Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda with their respective\nbaseline, intermediate, and end-of-project targets; they will be the basis for reporting progress.\nThe indicators, data sources, and data collection methods take into account the CDD approach\nand the limited institutional capacities in the project targeted areas. All indicators are\n\n\n26\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual work plans",
+ "confidence": 0.5528758764266968,
+ "start": 97,
+ "end": 100
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.7618529796600342,
+ "start": 221,
+ "end": 223
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5015394687652588,
+ "start": 213,
+ "end": 215
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5442435145378113,
+ "start": 336,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIMs",
+ "confidence": 0.9524182081222534,
+ "start": 407,
+ "end": 408
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "three participating countries",
+ "confidence": 0.8680281043052673,
+ "start": 413,
+ "end": 416
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "projectrelated data",
+ "confidence": 0.7310020327568054,
+ "start": 547,
+ "end": 549
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5271309018135071,
+ "start": 576,
+ "end": 577
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6840251684188843,
+ "start": 603,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6154685020446777,
+ "start": 603,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "project targeted areas",
+ "confidence": 0.8066110610961914,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 628
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "disaggregated by country, with further disaggregation by gender (percent female) for the core\nindicator on direct project beneficiaries.\n\n\n**C** **Sustainability**\n\n\n79. _**Institutional sustainability.**_ The DRDIP will be implemented through the existing\ninstitutions at the national, subnational, and local levels, and the project will make investments to\nenhance the capacities of these entities for engaging communities, planning, and implementing\nlocal-level infrastructure for service delivery, environmental management, and the promotion of\nlivelihoods. In this context, the DRDIP will contribute to institutional sustainability by\nreinforcing coordination and collaboration across the national, subnational, and local levels;\nrendering the local government planning and implementation process responsive to community\nneeds, thereby strengthening the social contract between citizens and the state; and ensuring\nlinkages across various sectoral ministries or departments and development partners for greater\nsynergies. While the lead implementing ministries at the national level vary across the three\nparticipating countries, there will be linkages and synergies across various relevant institutions\nand agencies.\n\n80. _**Sustainability of infrastructure.**_ The DRDIP will support investments in social and\neconomic infrastructure to support service delivery and benefits to target communities. However,\nthe project will only invest in the expansion, upgrade, and/or establishment of infrastructure with\nclose coordination with the respective sectoral agencies to ensure that the recurring O&M costs\nare included in annual budgets, guaranteeing the sustainability of infrastructure investments. For\nexample, classroom construction will be supported when prioritized by communities, when\nstudent-to-classroom ratios are above agreed-on norms, when teachers and teaching material are\nassigned, and when the education department can ensure that recurring costs are part of\nsubsequent plans and budgets.\n\n81. _**Economic sustainability.**_ The DRDIP will support the livelihoods program to include\ntraditional and nontraditional livelihoods as well as other income-generating activities. However,\nall investments will be based on community-identified priorities, technical feasibility, and market\nassessments to ensure that the livelihoods being supported are viable and enhance incomes for\ntarget communities.\n# **V KEY RISKS**\n\n\n82. The Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool (SORT) has been used to evaluate risks\nacross the DRDIP; it will continue to be used to monitor risks during implementation. The risks\nfocus on development results associated with the DRDIP, including the risk of failing to achieve\nintended results and the risk that the project might cause unintended—and possibly negative—\nresults. Table 4.3 summarizes and rates the major risks associated with the DRDIP.\n\n**Table 4.3. Risk-Rating Summary for the DRDIP** **[20]**\n\n|Risk Category|Rating|\n|---|---|\n|1. Political and Governance|Substantial|\n|2. Macroeconomic|Moderate|\n|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|Moderate|\n\n\n\n20 The Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool (SORT) ratings are reflective of the project as a whole based on participating countries and IGAD\nbut do not necessarily reflect individual country ratings.\n\n\n27\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator on direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7420888543128967,
+ "start": 16,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": null
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.9034751057624817,
+ "start": 44,
+ "end": 45
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.6547247767448425,
+ "start": 206,
+ "end": 207
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.8157527446746826,
+ "start": 396,
+ "end": 400
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "target communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6162363290786743,
+ "start": 382,
+ "end": 384
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.7925458550453186,
+ "start": 540,
+ "end": 544
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "participating countries",
+ "confidence": 0.5358760356903076,
+ "start": 558,
+ "end": 560
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|Substantial|\n|---|---|\n|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|Substantial|\n|6. Fiduciary|Substantial|\n|7. Environment and Social|Substantial|\n|8. Stakeholders|Moderate|\n|**OVERALL**|Substantial|\n\n\n**A** **Explanation of Overall Risk Rating**\n\n\n83. The overall implementation risk is _**substantial**_, primarily due to the project’s\ncomprehensive and multisectoral design, the fiduciary risks with regard to financial management\nand procurement, and the governance risks resulting from the fact that the project will be\nimplemented in underserved areas across three countries by implementing agencies with weak\nimplementation capacities. Because the project design builds on robust analytics, its components\nand activities are straightforward and focused, and the preparation process involved consultations\nwith a range of stakeholders in a majority of the project areas, the risks related to design and\nstakeholders is substantial but manageable.\n\n84. The political commitment for the project across the three participating countries is strong.\nAlthough domestic refugee legislation does not provide a path for refugees to acquire citizenship\nin any of the three participating countries, they are all borrowing to mitigate the impact of the\nrefugee presence on host communities to safeguard the asylum space, thereby preventing\nrefugees from remaining in legal and humanitarian limbo. However, in the majority of areas\nwhere the DRDIP will be implemented, refugee movements and their attendant impacts on host\ncommunities remain fluid. The uncertainty around the cessation of conflict and restoration of\npeace, especially in South Sudan, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, and\nYemen, contribute to the protracted nature of the instability and to the frequently changing case\nload of refugees around whom to plan interventions under the proposed operation. This\nuncertainty is mitigated by the series-of-projects approach, which allows for interventions to be\nscaled up in the same country and in targeted or other areas with Additional Financing\noperations.\n\n85. At the operational level, the project is adopting the CDD approach as an instrument of\nchoice of the three participating countries, which want communities to be an integral part of the\nplanning and implementation process with the support of the local administration and\nimplementing agencies. The project faces risk in terms of weak community and localgovernment experience and capacity in the DRDIP targeted areas, especially regarding the\nimplementation of World Bank-supported development interventions. In order to ensure the\nsustainability of capacity investments, the DRDIP will support mobilization, capacity\ndevelopment, the strengthening of community institutions, and capacity enhancement for\nexisting government structures through the recruitment of additional staff—especially with\nfiduciary and safeguard experience—at different levels under IDA financing.\n\n86. The DRDIP in Ethiopia, particularly in Gambela National Regional State, will contribute\nto meeting the commitments made as part of the World Bank management report and\nrecommendations in response to the Inspection Panel Investigation Report of the Ethiopia:\nPromoting Basic Services Phase III (Credit No 51620). In its response to the inspection panel\ninvestigation report, World Bank Group management noted that there are specific challenges for\nthe Anuak communities in Gambela. The investment components under the DRDIP will\n\n\n28\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "contribute to efforts at addressing challenges with regard to agriculture and livelihoods in\nGambela, including for the Anuak communities; and the implementation process will ensure\ncitizen participation in decision making about budgets and increased citizen voice and\naccountability.\n\n87. With respect to the fiduciary aspects, the DRDIP will support necessary financial\nmanagement capacities to ensure strong internal controls and adherence to proper financial\nprocedures. The three participating countries have agreed to an action plan for building needed\nsystems and capacities for procurement. Capacity enhancement, regular oversight, and yearly\naudits will be instituted, enhancing the efficiency and transparency of implementation and\nmitigating the weak procurement and financial management capacities, especially at the local\nlevel, that could result in noncompliance with agreed-on processes and procedures.\n\n88. Interventions under the DRDIP are not expected to lead to large-scale, significant, or\nirreversible environmental or social impacts. Safeguard instruments have been prepared to\naddress the impacts. Across the three countries, OP 4.12 has been triggered, and implementation\nof the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) would involve voluntary land donation.\nRetrospective assessments to ensure social due diligence will be required. Additionally, OP 4.10\nhas been triggered for Ethiopia, and an enhanced Social Assessment (SA) and consultations have\nbeen completed. Clearly defined processes will be adopted to ensure that project interventions\nhave _operational interface_ with other initiatives of the government of Ethiopia; this will mitigate\nadverse impacts. To address the safeguard risks of the potential interface between the Ethiopian\ngovernment's ongoing Commune Development Program and World Bank-financed projects\noperating in the Developing Regional States where the Commune Development Program is\nactive, a “screening checklist” will be used to ensure that the project does not knowingly support\nthe program; demonstrate that no kebeles covered by the Commune Development Program will\nbe considered in the project; and to identify any potential interface.\n\n89. The DRDIP will be implemented in a complex operating environment that includes a\nmultitude of public- and private-sector agencies and NGOs in the humanitarian and development\narena at various levels and across three countries. Coordination will be spearheaded by steering\nand technical committees at the national and subnational levels to prevent duplication, establish\nsynergies, and build on existing successful models. Linkages with global and regional initiatives\nwill be ensured through the Regional Secretariat in IGAD.\n\n# **VI APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A** **Economic and Financial Analysis**\n\n\n90. The economic and financial analysis conducted as part of the project preparation process\nsuggests that the proposed interventions are economically and financially feasible. As a CDD\nproject, it is not possible to predetermine actual investments. Therefore, analyses were carried\nout based on a typology of the DRDIP investments that are expected to be common across the\nthree participating countries of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda. These include a total of seven\ninterventions across the three investment components of the project and eight interventions that\nare cross-cutting with respect to project implementation. The project’s incremental benefits relate\nto: reduced transportation costs; financial savings derived from improved access to water points,\n\n\n29\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "education facilities, and primary health care (reduction in health costs and lost time due to\nillnesses); and increased returns on economic activities and economic infrastructure.\n\n91. _Rationale for public sector engagement._ The rationale for public-sector engagement for\nthe DRDIP is based on the role of each of the participating countries’ governments and local\nadministrations in promoting social and economic goals and their spillover effects for poor and\nhistorically underserved areas and populations. Investments funded through the DRDIP aim to\nmeet the demand for increased social services, both in terms of number of people and quality,\nand allow the most vulnerable—particularly women and children—to have access to health and\neducation services, water, energy, livelihoods, financing, and an enabling environment for\nbusiness and private-sector development through the creation of both business opportunities and\nimproved infrastructure that facilitates movement of communities along the value chain of\nproducts and services. Moreover, these interventions have positive externalities and important\nspillovers (as demonstrated by direct and indirect benefits), which justify the governments’ key\nroles. The public sector is also targeted by the World Bank’s specific interventions to strengthen\ncapacities at different levels of the administration and specifically at the local level, to support\ncommunity empowerment and be responsive to community needs. Finally, the mounting of\nmulti-sectoral interventions under the DRDIP to address the needs of communities hosting\nrefugees requires sound coordination between local administrations and central governments if\nthe proposed interventions are to be effectively implemented.\n\n92. _Value-added of World Bank support:_ The value added of the World Bank support to the\nproject is a result of the critical technical contribution based on international experience in the\nareas of gender, education, health, environment, energy, economics, and private-sector\ndevelopment, among many others; and its convening power to support the three countries under\nthe project through an innovative approach for addressing the impacts of protracted forced\ndisplacement. The World Bank will apply its vast regional and global expertise with CDD\nprojects to enhance the effectiveness of DRDIP implementation. These interventions would be\nrigorously evaluated in coordination with each of the countries to produce regional and\ninternational evidence of successful and innovative interventions based on lessons learned and\nexperience gained.\n\n93. While the economic analysis is based on these benefits, it should be noted that the\nconclusions are rather conservative because the returns from DRDIP investments are far larger,\nand a significant portion of benefits are not readily quantifiable. Net present values were\ncalculated for proposed interventions (table 6.1) with benefits quantifiable in monetary terms;\nother interventions show several intangible, indirect benefits (details in Annex 6).\n\n\n**Table 6.1. Proposed Interventions: Relative Costs and Benefits**\n\n\n\n|Project
Component|Proposed Intervention|Estimated
Cost (US$)|Net Present Value (US$)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Construction of one
borehole
Construction of one
health facility
Construction of one
school building
Construction of one 100-
kilometer paved road|9,750
388,330
195,484
3,416,980|76,974
-
-
-|\n\n\n30\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|2|Installation of one solar
panel system|822|-|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|-|Implementation of
financial system|318,525|-|\n\n\n_Source:_ Task Team calculations.\n\n94. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effect of variations in benefits and\ncosts in the realization of benefits on the internal rate of return. All results are apparently robust.\nNotwithstanding an increase in cost of 10 percent or a decrease in the total estimated benefits by\n10 percent, the results remain robust. Moreover, a third scenario that contemplates a 10 percent\nincrease in costs combined with a 10 percent decrease in benefits still shows a robust internal\nrate of return, considering a very conservative social discount rate of 2.6 percent (table 6.2). In\nconclusion, the overall net discounted benefits of the presented cost-benefit analysis remain\npositive under any circumstances.\n\n**Table 6.2. Sensitivity Analysis** **[21]**\n\n|Col1|Borehole (%)|Agropastoral and Fishery
Livelihoods (%)|\n|---|---|---|\n|Base Scenario|184|63|\n|Cost +10% OR Benefit -10%|166|55|\n|Cost +10% AND Benefit -10%|151|49|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations based on Cost Benefit Analysis simulations and estimated net present value of monetized\n\nbenefits.\n\n\n**B** **Technical**\n\n\n95. _Regional approach._ Forced displacement is a regional phenomenon in the HOA, with\nneighbors of conflict-affected countries bearing a huge burden in terms of refugee movements.\nImpacts of the refugee presence on host communities include increased pressure on scarce social\nservices such as education, health, and water; depletion of natural resources, such as forest and\nland degradation and loss of biomass; and competition for limited livelihood opportunities, such\nas income-generating activities. The DRDIP therefore supports interventions to mitigate the\nsocial, economic, and environmental impacts through the investment components across the\nthree participating countries. Specific activities will be determined based on local circumstances,\nbut the project offers a useful platform for learning about approaches and intervention successes\nacross the three countries. The project also supports robust knowledge generation, learning, and\nsharing at the regional level through the Regional Secretariat to enhance efficiencies and the\neffectiveness of interventions across the countries.\n\n96. _CDD approach._ The operational approach of CDD will be adopted for project\nimplementation in the underdeveloped and underserved areas that the DRDIP is targeting. The\nCDD approach embeds the required flexibility needed to respond to the scale and nature of\ncommunities’ needs in diverse local conditions. It will allow decision making to devolve to\ncommunities, ensuring that resource distribution is fair, supports priority local infrastructure and\nservice delivery needs, and incentivizes collective action.\n\n97. _Strengthening local development._ The DRDIP has made an informed choice of\nimplementation arrangements through existing government structures in the targeted areas which\nare underserved areas. Community-responsive approaches will be strengthened into the local\n\n21 Internal Rate of Return—social discount rate used: 2.6 percent based on Bank’s guidelines and the GDP growth analysis for the three countries\n\n\n31\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "development processes of planning and budget development process. Also, in order to mitigate\nrisks of remoteness of areas and limited implementation capacity, the project design will\nincorporate a reliance on the communities’ accountability mechanisms and the strategic use of\ntechnology; tailor the World Bank’s supervision with third-party monitoring; and strengthen\ncommunity institutions and local government capacity.\n\n\n**C** **Financial Management**\n\n\n98. A financial management assessment was conducted for the Ministry of Agriculture and\nNatural Resources (MoANR) in Ethiopia which will be using a Federal Project Coordination\nUnit (FPCU); for the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) in Uganda, which will be using the\nPIST under the Refugee Department; for the _Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social_\n(Djiboutian Social Development Agency, ADDS) in Djibouti that will be using a project\nimplementation team; and for the IGAD Secretariat. An assessment was also conducted at the\nsubnational level in four out of the five regional bureaus and four out of the 16 woredas in\nEthiopia. In Djibouti, an assessment covered the regions in Obock and Ali Sabieh; and in\nUganda, an assessment of the four districts of Adjumani, Arua, Kiryandongo, and Isingiro that\nwill be implementing the project was conducted.\n\n99. The FM assessment’s objective was to determine whether or not the implementing\nentities had acceptable financial management arrangements in place that would satisfy the\nBank’s Operation Policy/Bank Procedure (OP/BP) 10.00. These arrangements would ensure that\nthe implementing entities: (i) use project funds only for the intended purposes in an efficient and\neconomical way; (ii) prepare accurate and reliable accounts and timely periodic interim financial\nreports; (iii) safeguard assets of the project; and (iv) maintain acceptable auditing arrangements.\nThe financial management assessment was carried out in accordance with the “ _Financial_\n_Management Manual for World Bank Investment Project Financing Operations”_ that became\neffective on March 1, 2010, but was issued (retrofitted) on February 4, 2015.\n\n100. The findings of the assessment demonstrate that all of the implementing entities have\nadequate financial management arrangements except for the following aspects that need\nstrengthening:\n\n - **Ethiopia** . The MoANR federal project coordination unit will need to recruit a qualified\n\nand experienced financial management specialist and an accountant no later than three\nmonths after project effectiveness to ensure that adequate financial management\narrangements are in place for the project. In addition, the five regional and 16 woreda\nPCUs will each have to recruit an accountant no later than three months after\neffectiveness to account for project funds. Although financial management aspects are\npart of the PIM, MoANR will prepare a detailed financial management manual that is\nagreeable to the International Development Association (the Association) before\neffectiveness.\n\n - **Uganda** . The OPM PIST will need to recruit a qualified and experienced accountant to\n\naccount for the project funds within three months of effectiveness. Three districts—\nIsingiro, Arua, and Adjumani—will need to fill and/or designate qualified officers for the\nposition for the chief finance officer (CFO) and/or senior finance officer (SFO), who will\nbe in charge of accounting and reporting of project funds at the district level. Each district\nwill designate a qualified accountant to support the project. Similarly, the principal\ninternal auditor for Adjumani and senior internal auditor positions in Isingiro and Arua\n\n\n32\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8233115673065186,
+ "start": 79,
+ "end": 82
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Refugee Department",
+ "confidence": 0.7239916920661926,
+ "start": 131,
+ "end": 133
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.5057006478309631,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIST",
+ "confidence": 0.6500047445297241,
+ "start": 128,
+ "end": 129
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Refugee Department",
+ "confidence": 0.6302078366279602,
+ "start": 131,
+ "end": 133
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.736981213092804,
+ "start": 238,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "implementing\nentities",
+ "confidence": 0.9474813938140869,
+ "start": 250,
+ "end": 252
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5106448531150818,
+ "start": 341,
+ "end": 344
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.8565189838409424,
+ "start": 416,
+ "end": 417
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8860787749290466,
+ "start": 383,
+ "end": 384
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management manual",
+ "confidence": 0.9136115908622742,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 510
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "financial management aspects",
+ "confidence": 0.5527607202529907,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "MoANR",
+ "confidence": 0.9454936981201172,
+ "start": 502,
+ "end": 503
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.8909472823143005,
+ "start": 528,
+ "end": 529
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "are vacant. Each of the districts implementing the project will have to confirm with the\nOPM PIST that they have filled these key positions before disbursement can be made to\nthe districts. The audit committee at the OPM and the district public accounts committees\nare not effectively following up on audit issues to ensure they are addressed to facilitate\nthe strengthening of the internal control systems that are already in place. The committees\nwill need training to improve their effectiveness.\n\n - **Djibouti** . ADDS will need to do the following within three months of effectiveness:\n\nrecruit a qualified and experienced accountant and internal auditor in order to have\nadequate financial management arrangements for the project; enhance the functionality of\nthe management information system that records and pays beneficiaries in order to\nimprove its reporting mechanism; and update the project financial operation manual to\ncover the project’s financial management arrangements.\n\n - **IGAD Secretariat** . The Secretariat will need to recruit a qualified and experienced\n\naccountant no later than three months after project effectiveness. Persistent delays in\napproving budgets due to infrequent meetings of the IGAD Ministerial Committee will be\nmitigated by having a more efficient system of approving the budget, detailed in the PIM.\n\n101. Project implementation manuals that are acceptable to the Association have been\nprepared for all implementing entities. The PIMs cover financial management aspects related to\nthe project that are not covered in the existing financial management manuals. Governance and\nanticorruption arrangements will also be designed for this project, including putting a\ncomplaints-handling mechanism in place so that concerns raised by project beneficiaries can be\naddressed. Arrangements will made to work with anticorruption agencies in the three countries to\ndeal with fraud, engage in the prevention and detection of corruption, and set up communitylevel social audit committees. Implementing entities will be encouraged to post project budgets\nand audited financial statements on their websites in order to promote transparency and\naccountability. Additional details on the assessment are included in Annex 3.\n\n102. The assessment concludes that the financial management arrangements in place meet the\nAssociation’s minimum requirements under OP/BP10.00 and are therefore adequate for\nproviding, with reasonable assurance, accurate and timely information on the status of the project\nas required by the Association. The overall financial management residual risk rating is\n_substantial_ for MoANR in Ethiopia and Uganda, and _moderate_ for IGAD Secretariat and ADDS\nin Djibouti.\n\n\n**D** **Procurement Management**\n\n\n103. Procurement for the proposed project will be carried out in accordance with the World\nBank’s “Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works and Non-Consulting Services under\nInternational Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) Loans and IDA Credits and\nGrants by World Bank Recipients” (January 2011, updated July 2014); “Guidelines: Selection\nand Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank\nRecipients” (January 2011, updated July 2014); “Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud\nand Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants” (the AntiCorruption Guidelines—October 15, 2006, revised January 2011); and the provisions stipulated\nin the financing agreement.\n\n104. **In Djibouti,** procurement shall be carried out by the ADDS—the focal organization for\nthe DRDIP in Djibouti. Procurement activities will be carried out by a project implementation\n\n\n33\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "unit (PIU) to be established in ADDS and the staffing will include a procurement specialist\nacceptable to the Association. ADDS has experience implementing World Bank-financed\nprojects and is currently implementing three World Bank-financed projects. ADDS has\ndeveloped a master manual that includes a separate section on procurement, which has been\nreviewed and accepted by the Association. However, there are reported weaknesses in ADDS in\nthe area of procurement management.\n\n105. **In Ethiopia,** DRDIP implementation is streamlined by MoANR; regional- and woredalevel line agencies are accountable for oversight and coordination. The DRDIP will be\nimplemented in five regional states and 16 woredas. Procurement for the proposed project will\nbe implemented at the central level by the Procurement and Property Directorate of MoANR. At\nthe regional level, procurement activities will be executed by the procurement and property\nsubprocesses of regional bureaus of agriculture and natural resources. At the woreda level (local\ngovernment), procurement activities will be executed by the Woreda Finance and Economic\nDevelopment Offices of the respective woredas and by the beneficiary communities of the\nproject. Some of the implementing agencies have previous experience implementing World\nBank-financed projects, but capacity challenges are prevalent in most implementing agencies at\nthe subnational level.\n\n106. **In Uganda,** procurement for the DRDIP will be implemented at three levels: (i) central\ngovernment—OPM; (ii) local government in Adjumani, Arua, Kiryadongo, and Isingiro districts;\nand (iii) community. Procurement processing will be done at community, district, and central\ngovernment levels with interventions targeting host communities. The OPM, the implementing\nagency at the central government level, has executed two phases of the IDA-financed Northern\nUganda Social Action Fund, and the agency has some experience with IDA-funded procurement\nmanagement, although the Department of Refugees will be handling IDA funding for the first\ntime.\n\n107. **At IGAD,** procurement will be centrally carried out by the procurement unit of the IGAD\nSecretariat with assistance from a procurement officer who will be contracted by the Nairobi\noffice of the Regional Secretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration. IGAD’s\nprocurement unit, which is organized under the Directorate for Finance and Administration, was\ncreated in 2013 and is run by one senior procurement officer and an assistant. This team carries\nout the procurement activities for all projects executed by IGAD, although some projects\nestablish their own PIUs for the implementation of specific projects. The Secretariat has\nexperience in implementing donor-supported projects, including World Bank-financed projects.\nHowever, a qualified procurement officer will be recruited for the Nairobi office of the Regional\nSecretariat to support the grant operations.\n\n108. The three countries’ implementing agencies and IGAD will each prepare a separate a\ndetailed procurement manual that is agreeable to the Association before effectiveness. The\nindividual country PIMs also contain sections on procurement. Items under various expenditure\ncategories are described in Annex 3. In the Procurement Plans, for each contract to be financed\nby IDA Credits or by an IDA Regional Grant, the recipient or recipient and the Association have\nagreed on the different procurement methods or consultant selection methods, need for\nprequalification, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frames. The procurement\nplan will be updated annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs\nand improvements in institutional capacity. The recipients, contractors, suppliers, and consultants\n\n\n34\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "master manual",
+ "confidence": 0.6544440388679504,
+ "start": 42,
+ "end": 44
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.5652860999107361,
+ "start": 82,
+ "end": 83
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.8846297860145569,
+ "start": 86,
+ "end": 87
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.826783299446106,
+ "start": 82,
+ "end": 83
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.6590409874916077,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.6451811790466309,
+ "start": 232,
+ "end": 233
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6747729182243347,
+ "start": 294,
+ "end": 296
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIUs",
+ "confidence": 0.7430111765861511,
+ "start": 449,
+ "end": 450
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement manual",
+ "confidence": 0.5713441371917725,
+ "start": 511,
+ "end": 513
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "plan",
+ "confidence": 0.9186499714851379,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 601
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "will observe the highest standards of ethics during the procurement and execution of contracts\nfinanced under this project.\n\n**E** **Social—Including Safeguards** **[22]**\n\n\n109. The DRDIP is classified as Category B for IDA Credit-supported activities because\ninterventions are not expected to lead to large-scale, significant, or irreversible environmental\nand social impacts. The project triggers nine out of the ten safeguard polices: Environmental\nAssessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04), Forests (OP/BP 4.36), Pest\nManagement (OP/BP 4.09), Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11), Involuntary\nResettlement (OP/BP 4.12), Indigenous Peoples/Underserved and Vulnerable Peoples (OP/BP\n4.10), Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37), and International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50). With respect to\nthe IDA Regional Grant to IGAD, the Environmental Assessment Category is C, as the activities\nbeing supported relate to coordination, training, knowledge generation, and dissemination, and\nwill not trigger any safeguard policies.\n\n110. Key social challenges that the participating communities might face include: (i) gender\ndisparities in access to livelihood and skills development opportunities; (ii) limited access to\nsocial services, especially education, health services due to the remote nature of the target\ncommunities; and (iii) recurring conflicts over natural resources, particularly related to water\nmanagement and land tenure arrangements. The _service-delivery_ model of the project is a CDD\napproach, which will focus on local development promoted through empowering communities to\nsolve their problems by facilitating the process of identifying, prioritizing, implementing, and\nmonitoring subproject investments by the communities to ensure inclusiveness. Social due\ndiligence lessons aimed at building sustainable community assets, citizen\nparticipation/engagement, and gender mainstreaming are part of the livelihoods component.\n\n111. The project has triggered OP 4.12 for the three countries, and in line with the\nAssociation's safeguard policies, the project has put in place mitigation mechanisms acceptable\nto the Association to mitigate anticipated social impacts. For impact on potential land take and/or\nrestrictions in access to communal natural resources, a RPF has been prepared and consulted\nupon in the three countries. These have been disclosed prior to appraisal to address any potential\nimpacts, and given the expected small size of the footprint of the subproject activities, any land\nacquisition would be limited, site specific, and minor, with no physical displacement or\nrelocation.\n\n112. The Association’s OP 4.10 is triggered only for Ethiopia, based on the screening\nconducted by the World Bank and reinforced by the Constitution of Ethiopia, which indicate that\nthe majority of the target population identify themselves as having the characteristics defined\nunder OP 4.10. Therefore, a SA was conducted to complement the RPF. As part of the SA,\nextensive consultations were conducted with key stakeholders in the participating areas to seek\nbroad community support for the project; and in accordance with its CDD approach, subproject\nactivities will be identified, prioritized, implemented, and monitored by beneficiary\ncommunities, including a variety of social groups, through a consultative process during\nimplementation. The project includes a cost-effective and accessible grievance-handling\nmechanism to ensure that any project-related issues and concerns are resolved using due process.\n\n\n22 RPFs disclosure in-country and Infoshop – Djibouti on March 1, 2016; Ethiopia on March 7, 2016, and Uganda on March 13, 2016; and SA\ndisclosure in-country and Infoshop for Ethiopia on March 7, 2016.\n\n\n35\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "113. **Indigenous Peoples / Underserved People (OP 4.10)** . Triggered only for Ethiopia, a SA\nwith the affected persons and communities was completed. The social management plan\n(detailed in Annex 7) provides key findings of the SA, such as the process used to foster free,\nprior, and informed consultations and broad community support, including provision of\ngrievance-redress and benefit-sharing issues. Identified mitigating measures have been\nincorporated into the project design.\n\n114. **Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12)** . The proposed project will not undertake any\nactivities that will displace people. However, it would support small-scale infrastructure that\nmight affect the land holdings of individual farmers. While these interventions are yet to be\nidentified, as a precautionary measure, the project has prepared and consulted upon resettlement\npolicy frameworks for all three countries, and these have been disclosed prior to appraisal to\naddress any issues that might arise from economic displacement and/or restriction of access to\ncommunal natural resources.\n\n**F** **Environment—including Safeguards** **[23]**\n\n\n115. Some of the local-level investment activities under Components 1, 2, and 3 may have\nlimited adverse environmental risks and impacts. These activities could potentially include: (i)\nexpansion and improvement of service delivery, including the construction of small\ninfrastructure; (ii) construction or rehabilitation of physical structures for water catchment\nmanagement, such as check-dams and water harvesting structures, among others; and (iii) landbased livelihood activities, which could have limited adverse environmental and social impacts.\nEnvironmental and Social Management Frameworks (ESMFs) have been prepared in all three\ncountries to avoid or mitigate the environmental and social risks of these activities.\n\n116. **Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01)** . The following project-related activities are\nlikely to include environmental and social risks: (i) expansion and improvement of service\ndelivery, including small infrastructure; (ii) construction or rehabilitation of physical structures\nfor water catchment management, such as check-dams and water harvesting structures, among\nothers; and (iii) land-based livelihood activities, which could have limited adverse environmental\nand social impacts. Because the specific sites for implementing these activities are not yet\nknown, ESMFs have been prepared for the three project countries as the specific instrument for\nanalyzing potential environmental and social risks; they were disclosed prior to appraisal. The\nESMF would be used to develop a site-specific environmental management plan prior to the\ncommencement of activities, mostly under Components 1, 2, and 3. The ESMFs include standard\nmethods and procedures as well as appropriate institutional arrangements for screening and\nreviewing program activities and monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures to\nprevent adverse and cumulative impacts. The effective use of the ESMF will be regularly\nreviewed and audited.\n\n117. **Natural Habitats (OP 4.04)** . Project activities in Ethiopia and Uganda are not likely to\nencompass natural habitats. However in Djibouti, the Ali Sabieh Region is home to unique\nbiodiversity, especially the _Aire naturelle terrestre protege d’Assamo –_ the Assamo Terrestrial\nProtected Area, which is natural habitat to the Beira antelope. No project activities will be\nsupported in this protected area. The project will also not support any activities likely to\n\n\n23 ESMFs disclosure in-country and Infoshop – Djibouti on March 1, 2016; Ethiopia on March 7, 2016, and Uganda on March 13, 2016.\n\n\n36\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "indirectly affect the ecosystem that is critical for the survival of this species. The ESMF will\nscreen out any activities that could have indirect or cumulative impacts on this habitat.\n\n118. **Forests (OP 4.36)** . Activities under Component 2 are likely to have a positive impact on\nforests with the implementation of physical and biological measures for soil and water\nconservation and afforestation. The ESMF provides detailed procedures to screen program\nactivities/subprojects for potential adverse environmental and social impacts, and to take\nmeasures to avoid, minimize and mitigate impacts on forests. Project activities in Djibouti are\nnot likely to take place in protected forest areas.\n\n119. **Pest Management (OP 4.09)** . The project will support activities under Component 2 and\n3 that are likely to be agriculture-based and that may increase the application of agrochemicals\n(insecticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, among others). Therefore, the ESMF includes a\nguideline for integrated pest management to address related environmental and social impacts of\nthe project.\n\n120. **Physical Cultural Resources (OP 4.11).** The project sites and their potential cultural and\nhistorical significance are not known. The ESMF includes provisions and a set of procedures to\nscreen project activities for such impacts and to deal with chance finds.\n\n121. **Safety of Dams (OP 4.37).** Component 2 may support small dam construction (less than\n4.5 meters) as part of small- and micro-scale irrigation schemes. The project will use the Food\nand Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) “Manual on Small Earth Dams, A\nGuide to Siting, Design and Construction” (FAO 2010) or comparable text in French.\n\n122. **Projects on International Waterways (OP 7.50).** The project will finance small-scale\nirrigation investments, but these are not likely to be located in international water basins in\nDjibouti. In Ethiopia, the project is located in international water basins that include the BaroAkobo, Genale Dawa, Tekeze, and Abbhay rivers. In Uganda, the project is located along rivers\nand streams that drain into the international water basin of the River Nile. While the impact of\nsmall-scale irrigation on these rivers would be insignificant, and the cumulative abstraction is\nexpected to be minor, Riparian countries were notified on February 25, 2016 on behalf of\nEthiopia and March 11, 2016 on behalf of Uganda in accordance with the policy.\n\n123. **Climate Change Screening.** This was undertaken only for Ethiopia under the proposed\nproject because the bulk of the project investments will take place in Ethiopia and because there\nis a similarity in weather and climate conditions in the sites selected for interventions across the\nthree project countries. The project targeted areas are exposed to high temperatures, droughts,\nand/or floods due to intense rainfall during the main rainy season, which spans from July to\nOctober. Overall, the proposed project will contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions\nthrough Component 2 - Sustainable Environmental Management by supporting (i) measures on\nimproved energy efficiency in cooking and lighting, and increasing the use of renewable energy\nsources reducing pressure on biomass; and (ii) soil and water conservation measures,\nafforestation and area closures for regeneration that will contribute to reducing the impacts of\nclimate trends by improving water conservation, increased biomass and fodder availability.\nHowever, it is worth noting that project supported activities under Component 1 – Social and\nEconomic Services and Infrastructure such as roads are likely to be affected by climate trends.\nAlso, investments under Component 3 – Livelihoods Program which will support Agriculture\nand Livestock related livelihoods are likely to be impacted by climate trends.\n\n\n37\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "124. **Greenhouse Gas Accounting.** Greenhouse gas mitigation and carbon sequestration\npotential for selected project activities supported under the DRDIP was assessed for Ethiopia.\nProject-supported activities with the potential for enhancing climate change adaptation,\nresilience, and risk management were examined. In this context, the greenhouse gas analysis\ncovered activities proposed in Component 2, which focuses on sustainable environmental\nmanagement and the introduction of soil and water conservation activities on individual farms\nand communal lands as well as on the rehabilitation and introduction of small-, micro-, and\nhousehold-scale irrigation schemes. The analysis, using the EX-ACT tool showed that the project\nconstitutes a net carbon sink of -954,042 tCO2e over a period of 20 years, and thus -47,702\ntCO2e annually.\n\n125. **Consultations on safeguards** . The host community members in the participating areas of\nall three countries were consulted during project preparation to seek their buy in for the proposed\nproject investments; they will continue to be consulted during implementation. In Ethiopia, the\nMinistry of Agriculture and Natural Resources—the implementing ministry—and its respective\ncounterparts in the participating regions, zones, woredas, and kebele administrative levels, were\nalso consulted regarding the World Bank’s safeguard guidelines and the Ethiopia Environmental\nImpact Assessment proclamation. The applicable screening documents have been made available\nfor public review at a place accessible to local people, such as at a local government office\n(kebele council, woreda offices and regional bureaus, and at the Environmental Protection\nAgency), and in a form, manner, and language they can understand.\n\n126. In Djibouti, the implementing agency—ADDS—held consultations with the relevant\ngovernment agencies and NGOs in the communities in the two regions where the project\nactivities will be implemented. The documents have been disclosed in conformity with national\nrequirements.\n\n127. In Uganda, consultations were held with the implementing agency—the Office of the\nPrime Minister—and with the UNHCR, Uganda Red Cross Society, Lutheran World Federation,\nInter-Aid Uganda, Action Africa Help International, National Environment Management\nAuthority, National Forestry Authority, Ministry of Gender Labour and Social Development;\ndistrict and subcounty administrative-level government officials, and potential project target\ncommunities. All applicable safeguard instruments have been made available prior to appraisal\nin accessible places in Uganda and in the appropriate form, manner, and language.\n\n128. **Safeguard management capacity.** In Ethiopia, the Project has (i) conducted a\ncomprehensive SA with project affected persons to secure broad community support; and (ii)\ndeveloped a grievance-redress system; and a culturally appropriate benefit-sharing mechanism\nanchored on CDD service model. However, the recipient’s capacity to identify and assess\npotential adverse environmental and social impacts and to implement and monitor appropriate\nmitigation measures needs strengthening.\n\n129. In Djibouti and Uganda, the safeguard risks are associated with the client’s capacity to\nimplement the requisite mitigation actions. The implementing agency will recruit a qualified\nenvironmental and social specialist, no later than three months after project effectiveness, to\naddress environmental and social safeguard matters. For Djibouti, special attention will be\nrequired to ensure that activities in the Ali Sabieh region do not have negative impacts on the\nprotected area in Assamo.\n\n\n38\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "130. Across the three countries, the recipient will designate qualified and experienced social\nand environmental officers who will be responsible for social and environmental safeguard\nmatters at all levels of government. They will receive training on the World Bank safeguard\npolicies. The Association will support measures that will strengthen the recipients’ capacity to\nimplement the safeguard instruments prepared for this project through training and activities\nsupporting capacity. Further, the project's operational manuals and the planning process will be\nconducted in culturally and gender-sensitive manner.\n\n131. **Disclosure of safeguard documents** . All of the recipients’ assessments (ESMFs, RPFs,\nand SA) have been prepared, consulted upon, and finalized. The safeguard documents were\ndisclosed prior to appraisal in-country and at the World Bank InfoShop. The project is well\nplaced to comply with all relevant World Bank safeguard and national policies, and it has met\nthe requirements of the World Bank’s Disclosure Policy.\n\n\n**G** **World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n132. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a World\nBank-supported project may submit complaints to existing project-level grievance-redress\nmechanisms or the World Bank’s Grievance Redress Service. The service ensures that\ncomplaints received are promptly reviewed in order to address project-related concerns. Projectaffected communities and individuals may submit their complaints to the World Bank’s\nindependent Inspection Panel, which determines whether harm occurred or could occur as a\nresult of World Bank noncompliance with its policies and procedures. Complaints may be\nsubmitted at any time after concerns are first brought directly to the World Bank's attention, and\nWorld Bank management is given an opportunity to respond. More information on how to\nsubmit complaints to the World Bank’s corporate Grievance Redress Service can be found at\n[http://www.worldbank.org/GRS. Information on how to submit complaints to the World Bank](http://www.worldbank.org/GRM)\n[Inspection Panel can be found at www.inspectionpanel.org.](http://www.inspectionpanel.org/)\n\n\n39\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring
Country: Africa and the Middle East and North Africa
Project Name: Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P152822)
Results Framework
Project Development Objective
The proposed development objective is to improve access to basic social services, expand economic opportunities, and enhance environmental
management for communities hosting refugees in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda.
These results are at project level:|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|
**Project Development Objective Indicators**|\n||Country/
Beneficiary|Baselin
e|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|\n|Indicator Name|Indicator Name|Indicator Name|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|Beneficiaries with access to social and economic
services and infrastructure
(number)|DJ|0|0|10,000|40,000|70,000|110,011|110,011|\n|Beneficiaries with access to social and economic
services and infrastructure
(number)|ET|0|0|182,815|670,321|1,096,888|1,218,764|1,218,764|\n|Beneficiaries with access to social and economic
services and infrastructure
(number)|UG|0|0|121,450|231,418|379,204|462,836|462,836|\n|Beneficiaries with access to social and economic
services and infrastructure
(number)|**Total**|**0 **|**0 **|**314,265**|**941,739**|**1,616,092**|**1,791,600**|**1,791,611**|\n|Direct project beneficiaries
(number) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|3,573|10,720|21,441|35,734|35,734|\n|Direct project beneficiaries
(number) - (Core)|ET|0|0|22,906|114,530|297,778|435,214|458,120|\n|Direct project beneficiaries
(number) - (Core)|UG|0|0|106,281|233,440|373,536|462,800|462,800|\n|Direct project beneficiaries
(number) - (Core)|**Total**|**0 **|**0 **|**132,760**|**358,690**|**692,755**|**933,748**|**933,748**|\n|Female beneficiaries
(percentage - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)
|DJ|0|0|30%|50%|50%|50%|50%|\n|Female beneficiaries
(percentage - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)
|ET|0|5%|25%|50%|50%|50%|50%|\n|Female beneficiaries
(percentage - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)
|UG|0|0|40%|50%|50%|50%|50%|\n|Female beneficiaries
(percentage - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)
|**Total **|**0 **|**5%**|**30%**|**50%**|**50%**|**50%**|**50%**|\n\n\n40\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9982554316520691,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities hosting refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5635988116264343,
+ "start": 83,
+ "end": 86
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5472065210342407,
+ "start": 566,
+ "end": 569
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9819260239601135,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 610
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Female beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8825236558914185,
+ "start": 762,
+ "end": 764
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Female beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.596523642539978,
+ "start": 804,
+ "end": 806
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Beneficiaries of economic development activities that
report an increase in income
(number)|DJ|0|0|500|1,500|3,000|7,000|7,000|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Beneficiaries of economic development activities that
report an increase in income
(number)|ET|0|0|45,812|137,436|206,154|229,060|229,060|\n|Beneficiaries of economic development activities that
report an increase in income
(number)|UG|0|0|2,000|4,000|8,000|12,000|12,000|\n|Beneficiaries of economic development activities that
report an increase in income
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**48,312**|**142,963**|**217,154**|**248,060**|**248,060**|\n|Land area where sustainable land management practices
have been adopted as a result of the project
(hectare)|DJ|0|0|7.5|17.5|27.5|37.5|37.5|\n|Land area where sustainable land management practices
have been adopted as a result of the project
(hectare)|ET|0|0|10,800|25,200|32,400|36,000|36,000|\n|Land area where sustainable land management practices
have been adopted as a result of the project
(hectare)|UG|0|0|200|600|1,200|1,600|1,600|\n|Land area where sustainable land management practices
have been adopted as a result of the project
(hectare)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**11,007.5**|** 25,817.5**|**33,627.5**|**37,637.5**|**37,637.5**|\n|Strategy for the Regional Secretariat and annual progress
reports endorsed by participating countries|
IGAD|0|1|2|3|4|5|5|\n|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|Intermediate Results Indicators|\n||Country /
Beneficiary|Baseli
ne|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|Cumulative Target Values|\n|Indicator Name|Indicator Name|Indicator Name|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|Community-based organizations formed or reinforced
and still operational one year after receiving funding
(number)|DJ|0|0|20|62|124|144|144|\n|Community-based organizations formed or reinforced
and still operational one year after receiving funding
(number)|ET|0|0|234|585|819|819|819|\n|Community-based organizations formed or reinforced
and still operational one year after receiving funding
(number)|UG|0|0|200|400|800|1,200|1,200|\n|Community-based organizations formed or reinforced
and still operational one year after receiving funding
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**454**|**1,047**|**1,743**|**2,163**|**2,163**|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs (percentage)
(Percentage) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|20%|50%|70%|70%|70%|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs (percentage)
(Percentage) - (Core)|ET|0|0|20%|50%|70%|90%|90%|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs (percentage)
(Percentage) - (Core)|UG|0|0|50%|60%|70%|70%|70%|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs (percentage)
(Percentage) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**30%**|**55%**|**70%**|**76%**|**76%**|\n|Total beneficiaries - female (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|1,950|5,800|11,600|19,350|19,350|\n|Total beneficiaries - female (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|ET|0|5,726|28,632|74,444|108,803|114,530|114,530|\n|Total beneficiaries - female (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|UG|0|0|30,725|69,450|132,720|185,120|185,120|\n\n\n41\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries of economic development activities",
+ "confidence": 0.5145917534828186,
+ "start": 84,
+ "end": 89
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries of economic development activities",
+ "confidence": 0.7772738933563232,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 185
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Land area where sustainable land management practices",
+ "confidence": 0.682873547077179,
+ "start": 260,
+ "end": 267
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Land area where sustainable land management practices",
+ "confidence": 0.7754313945770264,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Intermediate Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.7278304100036621,
+ "start": 547,
+ "end": 550
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Total|0|5,726|61,307|149,694|253,123|319,000|319,000|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Total beneficiaries—male (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|1,950|5,800|11,600|19,350|19,350|\n|Total beneficiaries—male (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|ET|0|5,726|28,632|74,444|108,803|114,530|114,530|\n|Total beneficiaries—male (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|UG|0|0|30,725|69,450|132,720|185,120|185,120|\n|Total beneficiaries—male (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **|**5,726**|**61,307**|**149,694**|**253,123**|**319,000**|**319,000**|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs—total (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|3,900|11,600|23,200|38,700|38,700|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs—total (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|ET|0|11,452|57,264|148,888|217,606|229,060|229,060|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs—total (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|UG|0|0|61,450|138,900|265,440|370,240|370,240|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their
needs—total (number)
(Number - Subtype: Supplemental) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **|**11,452**|** 122,614**|**299,388**|**506,246**|**638,000**|**638,000**|\n|Infrastructure investments for which local governments
adopt recurrent budget allocations and/or operation and
maintenance plans
(percentage)|DJ|0|0|0|25%|30%|50%|50%|\n|Infrastructure investments for which local governments
adopt recurrent budget allocations and/or operation and
maintenance plans
(percentage)|ET|0|0|5%|20%|50%|80%|80%|\n|Infrastructure investments for which local governments
adopt recurrent budget allocations and/or operation and
maintenance plans
(percentage)|UG|0|0|50%|60%|70%|80%|80%|\n|Infrastructure investments for which local governments
adopt recurrent budget allocations and/or operation and
maintenance plans
(percentage)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**27.5%**|**35%**|**50%**|**70%**|**70%**|\n|Beneficiaries with access to improved energy sources
(number)|DJ|0|0|2,000|3,600|3,700|3,700|3,700|\n|Beneficiaries with access to improved energy sources
(number)|ET|0|0|3,665|14,660|32,985|36,650|36,650|\n|Beneficiaries with access to improved energy sources
(number)|UG|0|0|8,000|12,000|18,000|24,000|24,000|\n|Beneficiaries with access to improved energy sources
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**13,665**|**30,260**|**58,385**|**64,350**|**64,350**|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services
(hectare) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|7.5|17.5|27.5|37.5|37.5|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services
(hectare) - (Core)|ET|0|0|500|2,000|7,000|15,000|15,000|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services
(hectare) - (Core)|UG|0|0|200|400|600|800|800|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services
(hectare) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**707.5**|**2,417.5**|**7,627.5**|**15,875.5**|**15,875.5**|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services—
new|DJ|0|0|2|4|6|8|8|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services—
new|ET|0|0|150|950|4,450|10,950|10,950|\n\n\n42\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|UG|0|0|200|400|600|800|800|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**352**|**1,354**|**5,056**|**11,758**|**11,758**|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services -
Improved
(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|DJ|0|0|5.5|13.5|21.5|29.5|29.5|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services -
Improved
(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|ET|0|0|350|1,050|2,550|4,050|4,050|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services -
Improved
(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|UG|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|\n|Area provided with irrigation and drainage services -
Improved
(Hectare - Subtype: Breakdown) - (Core)|**Total **|**0 **||**355.5**|**1063.5**|**2,571.5**|**4,079.5**|**4,079.5**|\n|Financed subprojects that are functioning or delivering
services to communities six months after completion
(number)|DJ|0|0|4|8|12|20|20|\n|Financed subprojects that are functioning or delivering
services to communities six months after completion
(number)|ET|0|0|27|139|251|279|279|\n|Financed subprojects that are functioning or delivering
services to communities six months after completion
(number)|UG|0|0|54|95|170|210|210|\n|Financed subprojects that are functioning or delivering
services to communities six months after completion
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**85**|**242**|**433**|**509**|**509**|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood-support activities
(number)|DJ|0|0|150|300|450|900|900|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood-support activities
(number)|ET|0|0|13,744|54,975|96,206|137,436|137,436|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood-support activities
(number)|UG|0|0|4,000|8000|10,000|12,000|12,000|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood-support activities
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**17,894**|**63,275**|**106,656**|**150,336**|**150,336**|\n|Work days created for short-term employment in the
subprojects
(number)|DJ|0|0|12,720|25,440|38,160|50,880|50,880|\n|Work days created for short-term employment in the
subprojects
(number)|ET|0|0|81,000|417,000|753,000|837,000|837,000|\n|Work days created for short-term employment in the
subprojects
(number)|UG|0|0|10,000|30,000|60,000|80,000|80,000|\n|Work days created for short-term employment in the
subprojects
(number)|**Total **|**0 **|**0 **|**103,720**|**472,440**|**851,160**|**967,880**|**967,880**|\n|Meeting of the project’s regional steering committee,
knowledge sharing, and learning workshop organized
annually by the Regional Secretariat.|IGAD|0|1|2|3|4|5|5|\n\n\n43\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Indicator Description|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Project Development Objective Indicators**|**Project Development Objective Indicators**|**Project Development Objective Indicators**|**Project Development Objective Indicators**|**Project Development Objective Indicators**|\n|Indicator Name|Description/Definition of Indicator|Frequency|Data Source/
Methodology|Party
Responsible for
Data Collection|\n|Beneficiaries with access to
social and economic services
and infrastructure|This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries
that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and
economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries.|MTR
EOP|HH surveys; beneficiary
assessment; progress
reports|PIUs|\n|Direct project beneficiaries|Direct project beneficiaries are people or groups who
derive direct benefits from an intervention; they
would be among the host communities, such as
children benefitting from an immunization program
or families with a new piped water connection. It is
important to note that this indicator requires
supplemental information.
Supplemental value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition
of direct project beneficiaries, the proportion of the
direct project beneficiaries who are female is
specified. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
MTR/EOP|HH surveys; evaluations;
beneficiary assessments;
progress reports|PIUs|\n|Female beneficiaries|Based on the assessment and definition of direct
project beneficiaries, specify what percentage of the
beneficiaries are female.|MTR/EOP|HH surveys; evaluations;
beneficiary assessments;
progress reports|PIUs|\n|Beneficiaries of economic
development activities that
report an increase in income|This will assess how the beneficiaries are
economically faring after the project support is
provided.|MTR
EOP|HH surveys; evaluation;
beneficiary assessments;
progress reports|PIUs|\n|Land area where sustainable
land-management practices
have been adopted as a result|This will assess the increased hectare developed for
sustainable land management practices.|MTR
EOP|HH surveys; evaluation|PIUs|\n\n\n44\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9978240728378296,
+ "start": 36,
+ "end": 40
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host community and refugee beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5813717246055603,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 168
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "HH surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.7034372091293335,
+ "start": 176,
+ "end": 178
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9256637096405029,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "HH surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.5408807396888733,
+ "start": 338,
+ "end": 340
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8717721104621887,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.6401286125183105,
+ "start": 346,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "HH surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.7520812153816223,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 461
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIUs",
+ "confidence": 0.5185361504554749,
+ "start": 476,
+ "end": 477
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|of the project|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Strategy for the Regional
Secretariat for coordination,
learning, and knowledge
sharing and annual progress
reports endorsed by
participating countries|The strategy and the progress reports will provide
detailed information on the activities of the
Secretariat, including learning activities (research,
studies and annual regional learning and exchange
workshop), technical assistance provided to the
countries, and monitoring activities.|Annually|Strategy and progress
reports|IGAD|\n||||||\n|**Intermediate Results Indicators**|**Intermediate Results Indicators**|**Intermediate Results Indicators**|**Intermediate Results Indicators**|**Intermediate Results Indicators**|\n|Indicator Name|Description/Definition of Indicator|Frequency|Data Source/
Methodology|Responsibility
for Data
Collection|\n|Community-based
organizations—formed and
operational|This will determine the number of community-based
organizations created or reinforced that remain
operational.|Annually,
after second
year|Progress reports|PIUS|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project
investments reflected their
needs (percentage)|This will measure the extent to which decisions about
the project consistently reflected community
preferences.|Annually,
after second
year|Progress reports;
beneficiary assessments|PIUs|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project
investments reflected their
needs—female (number)|This will measure the extent to which decisions about
the project consistently reflected community
preferences (number of females).|Annually,
after second
year|Progress reports;
beneficiary assessments|PIUs|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project
investments reflected their
needs—male (number)|This will measure the extent to which decisions about
the project consistently reflected community
preferences (number of males).|Annually,
after second
year|Progress reports;
beneficiary assessments|PIUs|\n|Infrastructure investments
for which local governments
adopt recurrent budget
allocations and/or operation
and maintenance plans|This will assess the appropriation of new
infrastructure investments made by the local
government.|Annually,
beginning in
second year|Progress report
evaluation|PIUs|\n|Beneficiaries with access to
improved energy sources|This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing
an improved source of energy, such as cooking|Annually,
after second|HH
evaluation;|PIUs|\n\n\n45\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Intermediate Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6950157284736633,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.6392903327941895,
+ "start": 270,
+ "end": 272
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.524429202079773,
+ "start": 276,
+ "end": 277
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8245091438293457,
+ "start": 329,
+ "end": 331
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.7412267923355103,
+ "start": 335,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7719409465789795,
+ "start": 473,
+ "end": 475
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "local governments",
+ "confidence": 0.5428162813186646,
+ "start": 492,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|devices and renewable energy.|year|beneficiary assessment|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Area provided with irrigation
and drainage services
(hectare)|This indicator measures the total area of land
provided with irrigation and drainage services under
the project, including in (i) the area provided with
new irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area
provided with improved irrigation and drainage
services, expressed in hectares.|Annually,
after second
year|Progress report
evaluation|PIUs|\n|Area provided with irrigation
and drainage services—new
(hectare)|This indicator measures the total area of land
provided with new irrigation and drainage services.|Annually,
after second
year|Progress report
Evaluation|PIUs|\n|Area provided with irrigation
and drainage services—
improved (hectare)|This indicator measures the total area of land
provided with improved irrigation and drainage
services, expressed in hectares.|Annually,
after second
year|Progress report
evaluation|PIUs|\n|Financed subprojects that are
functioning and delivering
services to communities six
months after completion|This will assess the performance of the subproject
financed by the project.|Annually,
after second
year|HH
Evaluation;
Beneficiary assessments|PIUs|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood-
support activities|This will assess the number of beneficiaries that
benefited from the project’s livelihood activities.|Annually,
after second
year|HH Evaluation;
Beneficiary assessments|PIUs|\n|Work days created for short-
term employment in the
subprojects|This will assess the total number of work days
created in all subprojects.|Annually,
after second
year|HH survey;
evaluation of
progress report|PIUs|\n|Meeting of the project’s
regional steering committee,
knowledge sharing, and
learning workshop organized
annually by the Regional
Secretariat.|This will assess whether or not the regional activities
proposed in the Regional Secretariat’s strategy have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member
states.|At the end of
second year|Evaluation of
progress report
|IGAD|\n\n\n\n_Note:_ HH = Household; IGAD = Intergovernmental Authority on Development; PIU = Project Implementation Unit.\n\n\n46\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7058769464492798,
+ "start": 56,
+ "end": 57
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.7939276695251465,
+ "start": 134,
+ "end": 136
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "PIUs",
+ "confidence": 0.6238346099853516,
+ "start": 141,
+ "end": 142
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.8866367936134338,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.7707950472831726,
+ "start": 335,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "PIUs",
+ "confidence": 0.5508214831352234,
+ "start": 202,
+ "end": 203
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.7654640674591064,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 457
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 2: Country Contexts on with Regard to Forced Displacement**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n**Forced Displacement**\n\n1. The HOA region covers Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan,\nSudan, and Uganda. Despite its rich endowment in human, social, and natural capital, the HOA\nregion is plagued by a complex history of capacity constraints, pockets of poverty and insecurity,\nincreasing environmental degradation, and a range of persistent development challenges.\nConflict remains endemic in the region. The complex cultural, social, and political nature of\nthese conflicts is compounded by demographic shifts due to population growth; the movement of\npeople; imbalanced service provision; increasing contestation over scarce natural resources; and\nharsh climatic conditions, including frequent droughts and floods.\n\n\n2. Displacement has emerged as a regional phenomenon, with spillover effects in countries\ndirectly neighboring those experiencing conflict and posing major challenges to reducing poverty\nand achieving sustainable development with peace and security in the HOA. Map 2.1 provides an\noverview of active displacement sites in the HOA as of December 2015. The region hosts over\n9.5 million displaced persons, including over 6.5 million internally displaced persons and about 3\nmillion refugees, as of June 2015. Displacement in the HOA has been compounded by migration\nwithin and outside the region, driven by a number of natural and man-made reasons, including\nclimate change and environmental degradation, which have acted as threat multipliers [24] .\n\n\n**Map 2.1. Displacement Overview in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n24 “Accelerating Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon Development: The Africa Climate Business Plan.” Africa Region, World Bank Group,\nWashington, D.C.\n\n47\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "3. The proposed project will be implemented in three refugee-hosting countries: Djibouti,\nEthiopia, and Uganda, which have been generously providing asylum to significant numbers of\nrefugees for several decades. The refugee policies and legal and institutional frameworks in the\nthree countries offer refugees a variety of rights and privileges, including protection and\nnonrefoulment. [25] However, none of the domestic refugee laws provide a path for refugees to\nacquire citizenship including local integration of refugees. In addition, the refugee-hosting areas\nin the three countries face significant development deficits, which have been further exacerbated\nby the protracted displacement of refugees as reflected in the competition for services;\nlivelihoods; and natural resources, especially water and biomass. Due to the insufficient attention\nthat has been paid to the development dimensions of protracted displacement situations, the\nnegative impacts of displacement on host communities have not been adequately addressed. In\nlight of this, concerted efforts are required to maintain, and if possible expand, the existing\nasylum space for refugees through conscious efforts to mitigate the adverse impacts of the\nrefugee presence on host communities.\n\n\n4. The proposed project is situated within this context. It seeks to help address the needs of\nhost communities in the targeted areas of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda, adopting a holistic and\ncomprehensive approach to improve service delivery, address environmental degradation, and\nprovide livelihood opportunities to the host communities. These efforts are expected to benefit\nrefugees as well, contributing to the design of transitional or progressive solutions for them in a\nmore conducive and opportunistic social and economic ecosystem. Additionally, the investments\nwill contribute to mitigating conflict caused by the increased competition for services,\nlivelihoods and natural resources; increase social cohesion, and support better integration\nbetween the economies of the refugees and the host communities.\n\n\n**Refugee Situation**\n\n\n_**Djibouti**_\n\n\n5. By December 31, 2015, Djibouti had hosted over 15,000 refugees, mostly Somali\nnationals. Most refugees are hosted at the Ali Addeh (10,846) and Holl Holl (2,155) refugee\ncamps surrounded by host populations that face greater food insecurity and that have very\nlimited access to basic social services and livelihood opportunities. Both refugees and host\ncommunities have low asset holdings, which include livestock. The situation of the host\ncommunity is dire following the loss of most of their camels and goats during the past six\nconsecutive years of drought. Both refugee and host-community households depend on\nunreliable income sources, mainly from charcoal and wood sales; nonagricultural wages, such as\ndomestic labor; and gifts and remittances [26] . Map 2.2 presents the displacement situation in\nDjibouti as of December 2015.\n\n\n6. The recent crisis in Yemen between the Houthi’s and the Yemeni government has caused\nan influx of Djiboutian and foreign nationals into Djibouti. As of December 31, 2015, 6,179\nYemenis were registered by the Djibouti government, 2,829 being hosted at the Markazi camp\nand the rest living in the town of Obock and in Djibouti City. Table 2.1 provides the populations\n\n\n25 The right not to be forcefully returned to the place from which they escaped.\n26 WFP and CARE. 2013. “Food Security, Livelihoods and Markets Report for Ali Addeh and Holl Holl – Djibouti Refugees and Host\nCommunity.”\n\n48\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "of the targeted host communities and refugee populations. As of December 2015, over 30,600\npersons of various nationalities have arrived in Djibouti: 16,691 persons (55 percent) Yemeni\nnationals; 11,996 (39 percent) transiting migrants; and 1,919 persons (6 percent) are Djiboutian\nreturnees. [27]\n\n\n**Map 2.2. Displacement Situation in Djibouti**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n**Table 2.1. Target Host Community and Refugee Populations**\n\n|Region|Sub prefecture|Host population|Refugee camp|Refugee population|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Ali Sabieh|Holl-Holl|25,016|Holl-Holl|2,155|\n|Ali Sabieh|Ali Addeh|24,192|Ali Addeh|10,846|\n|Obock|-|41,426|Markazi|6,376|\n|**Total population**|**Total population**|90,634||19,377|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n7. In addition to hosting Somali refugees, Djibouti has been the main transit route for\nmigrants from HOA countries traveling to the Middle East and Europe seeking better economic\nopportunities. Mixed migration is a common challenge in the HOA as evidenced by the\nhazardous journey made by thousands of Somali, Ethiopian, Eritrean, and Sudanese migrants\nthrough Djibouti in transit to Yemen and the Arab Peninsula in search of a better life in Saudi\nArabia and the Gulf States. Since 2009, departure points around the Obock areas of Djibouti\nhave become the locus for the mixed migration flows of individuals attempting to reach Yemen.\nThe latest data on sea arrivals shows that, despite the ongoing conflict, 92,446 people arrived by\nboat into Yemen in 2015 (UNHCR 2016). While the International Organization on Migration in\n\n\n27 Djibouti-Inter-agency update for the response to the Yemeni crisis #33, 12 January 2016\n\n49\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data on sea arrivals",
+ "confidence": 0.8637638092041016,
+ "start": 325,
+ "end": 329
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.9516363739967346,
+ "start": 209,
+ "end": 210
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9253780841827393,
+ "start": 210,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7665864825248718,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 63
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Djibouti has opened a migrant response center in the town of Obock, the pressure on local\nservices and consequently on residents has been immense.\n\n\n8. The service-delivery mechanism and livelihood opportunities were already insufficient\nfor the existing Djiboutian population before the situation with internally displaced persons was\nstretched further by the Yemeni situation. There is a need for a comprehensive response by the\nGovernment of Djibouti to provide support to communities affected by refugee displacement,\ndrought-induced internal displacement, mixed migration, and migration to Djibouti following the\ncrisis in Yemen.\n\n\n_**Ethiopia**_\n\n9. Ethiopia hosts the largest refugee population in Africa. At the end of December 31, 2015.\nthere were 733,644 refugees in Ethiopia (map 2.3) as a result of droughts, conflicts, political\nevents, and civil wars in neighboring countries, including Somalia, Eritrea, South Sudan, and\nSudan (UNHCR 2016). Since the outbreak of the South Sudanese civil war in December of\n2013, more than 350,000 South Sudanese refugees have sought asylum in Ethiopia. Most\nEritrean and Somali refugees in Ethiopia are living in protracted displacement. The majority of\nrefugees live in camps situated near the borders of their respective countries of origin.\n\n\n**Map 2.3. Displacement Situation in Ethiopia**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n10. The majority of refugees in Ethiopia are hosted in the five emerging regions of\nEthiopia: (i) the Afar National Regional State; (ii) the Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional\nState; (iii) the Gambela National Regional State; and (iv) the Ethiopian Somali National\nRegional State; and (v) the Tigray National Regional State. These are among the poorly\ndeveloped regions in the country, characterized by harsh weather conditions, poor infrastructure,\n\n\n50\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 64
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "extremely low capacity, high levels of poverty, and very poor development indicators. The arid\nenvironment in Afar National Regional State and Ethiopian Somali Regional State in addition to\ntheir small and scattered pastoral populations makes providing services challenging. Many parts\nof the five regions are inaccessible, with poor or no roads. Due to their proximity to the fragile\nand conflict-affected states of Eritrea, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan, these five regions are\nhosting over 95 percent of refugees in Ethiopia (table 2.2). The presence of refugees puts strains\non the already weak public services and economic opportunities as well as the environment,\njeopardizing the resilience of communities hosting the refugees.\n\n\n**Table 2.2. Refugee Presence by National Regional State in Ethiopia (as of December 2015)**\n\n|National Regional State|Number of Refugees|\n|---|---|\n|Afar National Regional State|31,798|\n|Addis Ababa City Administration|8,094|\n|Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State|50,601|\n|Gambela National Regional State|269,813|\n|Ethiopian Somali National Regional State|250,838|\n|Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Regional State|3,556|\n|Tigray National Regional State|37,876|\n|**Total**|**733,644**|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n11. Somali refugees, fleeing insecurity and famine, are the second largest refugee group in\nEthiopia and live in three refugee camps around the Jigjiga area—Sheder, Aw-barre, and\nKebribeyah—and in five refugee camps in the Dolo Addo area—Melkadida, Bokolmayo,\nHilaweyn, Buramino, and Kobe in the Ethiopian Somali National Regional State. A small\nnumber live in Addis Ababa. Eritrean refugees are mainly located in four refugee camps—\nShimbela, Mai-Ain, Hitsats and Adi-Harush in Shire, Tigray National Regional State; in one\nrefugee camp—Berhale—and two refugee locations—Dalool and Eebti—in Afar National\nRegional State. A number of urban Eritrean refugees also live in Addis Ababa and Mekelle.\nSudanese refugees, mainly fleeing fighting in Blue Nile State live in three camps in the Assosa\narea—Sherkole, Ashura, and Bambasi—and one refugee location—Ad-Damazin—in\nBenishangul Gumuz National Regional State. The South Sudanese refugees are present in a large\nnumber in the Gambela National Regional State; they live in six refugee camps: Okugo, Jewi,\nPugnido, Kule, Tierkidi, and Leitchour.\n\n\n12. The Ethiopian Somali National Regional State, located in the eastern part of Ethiopia, is\nthe second largest of the country’s nine regional states and has nine zones and 68 woredas.\nAbout 86 percent of the population of 4.4 million live in rural areas. Most are pastoralists; some\nare agropastoralists. The region suffers from recurrent droughts and floods, which contributes to\nthe region’s poverty [28] . The Ethiopian Somali National Regional State currently hosts the highest\nnumber of refugees in the country consisting of 248,229 Somalia refugees. There are eight\nrefugee camps in the region located in four woredas—Dolo Addo with two camps, Boklomayo\nwith three, Aw-barre with two, and Kebribeyah with one—and in eight kebeles with one camp\neach. The total population of the three refugee-hosting woredas combined is 769,056; the total\n\n28 Lelieveld, Marlijn. 2011. “Child Protection in the Somali Region of Ethiopia.” BRIDGES Project, Addis Ababa\n\n51\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "development indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.898265540599823,
+ "start": 12,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afar National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.7234547138214111,
+ "start": 19,
+ "end": 23
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7838032245635986,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 147
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9469431042671204,
+ "start": 87,
+ "end": 88
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Refugee Presence by National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.5507768392562866,
+ "start": 134,
+ "end": 140
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.5508536100387573,
+ "start": 89,
+ "end": 90
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5008283853530884,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 147
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9437673091888428,
+ "start": 87,
+ "end": 88
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Child Protection in the Somali Region of Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.7108798027038574,
+ "start": 647,
+ "end": 655
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Lelieveld, Marlijn",
+ "confidence": 0.7291857600212097,
+ "start": 640,
+ "end": 643
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somali Region of Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.7890039682388306,
+ "start": 651,
+ "end": 655
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2011",
+ "confidence": 0.8425655364990234,
+ "start": 644,
+ "end": 645
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting woredas",
+ "confidence": 0.9600442051887512,
+ "start": 629,
+ "end": 631
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 65
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "population of the eight refugee hosting kebeles is 161,585. Refugee constitute 154 percentage of\nthe total eight kebeles population and 32 percentage of the total population of the three woredas.\n\n\n13. The Gambela National Regional State, located in the western part of the country\nbordering South Sudan, has a population of 307,000. The Nuer people comprise the majority of\nthe population, followed by the Anuak and Majang peoples. The Gambela Region has\nexperienced conflict between the Anuak and the Nuer, tracing back to the early 20th century.\nGambela has been hosting South Sudanese refugees for decades, and the ongoing civil war in\nSouth Sudan has led to an influx of even more refugees. Akin to other refugee situations, the\nsituation in Gambela is likely to impact food security, public services, economic opportunities,\nand the livelihoods of host communities. The Gambela Region is currently home to about\n219,000 South Sudan refugees. The refugees in Gambela Region are located in three woredas\nand five camps. The total population size of the three host woredas is about 112,000, while the\ntotal population of the six host kebeles is 13,000. About 75 percent (163,241) of the total\nrefugees in Gambela Region are located in only one woreda—Gog Woreda—in six refugee\ncamps located in three kebeles—Pugnido, Terkedi, and Kule—with two refugee camps in each\nkebele. The remaining 25 percent of the refugees in the region are located in Abol and Dimma\nworedas in two kebeles, one host kebele in each woreda (Jewe and Okugo), and one refugee\ncamp in each kebele.\n\n\n14. In Gambela Region, the refugee population significantly exceeds that of the host woredas\nand kebeles. The total population size of the refugees in the region is 1,682 percent that of the\nfive host kebeles and 195 percent of that of the three host woredas. For instance, the size of the\nrefugee population in the Pulajay and Ukedi camps in Pugnido Kebele is more than 63,000,\nwhile the total population of the Pugnido Kebele is only 100 households, clearly indicating the\nextent of the refugee’s impact on the host communities’ socioeconomies and environments.\n\n\n15. Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State is located in the northwestern part of\nEthiopia. It has an estimated population of 784,345. The economic activities in the region are\npredominantly agricultural; livestock is of limited importance. Despite its high potential for\nagricultural development, the region continues to face food insecurity. Inadequate infrastructure\nand limited social and economic infrastructure are among the key development challenges\naffecting the area (Save the Children 2013). The region hosts nearly 50,000 refugees—mainly\nSudanese—in four refugee camps (UNHCR 2015b). Tonga Camp is located in Tonga Kebele in\nMao-Komo Woreda, Wamba Camp is located in Bambasi Kebele of the Bambasi Woreda; and\nSherkole and Tsore Almetema Camps are located in Sherkole and Tsore Kebeles in Hamosha\nWoreda. In three out of the four host kebeles where two refugee camps are located in each, the\nrefugee population significantly exceeds that of the host kebeles. The refugee population in the\nregions is 132 percent of that of the four host kebeles’ and 29 percent of that of the three host\nworedas’ total population.\n\n\n16. Tigray Region, bordering Eritrea and Sudan, hosts nearly 120,000 refugees mainly\nEritreans, in four camps. Mai-Aimi and Hundet Camps are located in Mai-Aimi and Adi-Harush\nKebeles, respectively, in Tselemt Woreda. Mai-Kule Refugee Camp is located in Shimelba\nKebele in Tahtay Adyabo Woreda; and Hitsats Camp is located in Hitsats Kebele in Asgede\nTsimbila Woreda. The total population in the three host woredas and four host kebeles are\n\n\n52\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Save the Children",
+ "confidence": 0.5215131044387817,
+ "start": 490,
+ "end": 493
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.6772881746292114,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 514
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.6811855435371399,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8447814583778381,
+ "start": 503,
+ "end": 504
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 66
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "418,833 and 39,099, respectively. Hence, the total number of refugees stands at 298 percent of\nthat of the four host kebeles and 28 percent of that of the three host woredas (See table 2.3.)\n\n\n**Table 2.3. Host and Refugee Populations in Project Areas in Ethiopia**\n\n\n53\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 67
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "17. Afar Region, located in the northeast of Ethiopia, shares a border with Eritrea and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Woreda|Refugee
Camp|Kebeles|Kebele
Population|Woreda
Population|Refugee
Population|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|**Benishangul-Gumuz National Regional State**|\n|Mao-Komo|Tongo|Tagajalisi, Wangagiten, Tolodokonu,
Shesherebutuge Wetse Weyesa, Banga,
Tsotsora, Bure, Mimiakobo, Kesser Mender 1
and 2, Bobos Shibaba|37,475|65,987|11,381|\n|Bambasi|Bambasi|Wamba, Mender 41, Mender 42, Mender 43,
Mender 53, Dabus, Mutsa, Bambasi 1 and 2|18,196|62,693|14,983|\n|Homosha|Sherkole and
Tsore|Tumet, Algelea, Dareselam, Ashura, Jima,
Sherkole, Alfashir, Shula, Bo,adon, Dugna
Arumela, Tsore Almetema, Akendo Afafir,
Gumu Abushu|25,320|25,320|19,443|\n|Subtotal|||||45,807|\n|**Afar National Regional State**|**Afar National Regional State**|**Afar National Regional State**|**Afar National Regional State**|**Afar National Regional State**|**Afar National Regional State**|\n|Asayita|Asayita|Hinerie, Asayta 01, Asayta 02, Gehertu,
Handeg, Galifage|28,075|60,587|9,621|\n|Berahle|Berahle|Berahle 01, Kora, Daar, Lelaala, Saraqi|36,729|94,082|8,181|\n|Subtotal|||||17,802|\n|**Tigray National Regional State**|**Tigray National Regional State**|**Tigray National Regional State**|**Tigray National Regional State**|**Tigray National Regional State**|**Tigray National Regional State**|\n|Tselemt|Adi Harush|Hundet, M/Alem, May Tsebri|47850|142,173|41,840|\n|Tselemt|Mai Aini|Mai Aini, Mai Teklit, Mai Anbesa|32,417|32,417|23,361|\n|Tahtay
Adyabo|Shimelba|Mai Kule, Adasir, Adile, Meteltel|29,497|111,493|6,377|\n|Asgede-
Tsimbla|Hitsats|Hitsats, Simret, Edaga Hibret, Mai Berbere,
Selam|30,277|165,167|44,912|\n|Subtotal|||||116,490|\n|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|**Ethiopian Somali National Regional State**|\n|Dollo Ado|Buramino|Shambel, Kelem singi, Amno, Bilomi,
Mekinajat, Bur|18100|100,000|81,370|\n|Dollo Ado|Heleweyne|Waysh Hibir, God Bekol|4200|4200|4200|\n|Bokolmanyo|Melkadida|Ligano, Derder|3700|80,000|129,554|\n||Bokolmanyo|Seblel, Lowalahaji, Burbusen|5820|5820|5820|\n||Kobe|Kobe, Kola|4500|4500|4500|\n|Awbarre|Awbarre|Gobele, Diliasher Ali, Balider, Ayale, Kelo|27000|339,056|13,215|\n|Awbarre|Sheder|Dire, Reko, Kebrnoro, Debelwoyni, Sheder,
Flingab|34,500|12000|12,000|\n|Kebribeyah|Kebribeyah|Kebribeyah 02, Danap, Serda, Gerbi, Tongada|63,715|250,000|14,545|\n|Subtotal|||||248,229|\n|**Gambela National Regional State**|**Gambela National Regional State**|**Gambela National Regional State**|**Gambela National Regional State**|**Gambela National Regional State**|**Gambela National Regional State**|\n|Gog|Pugnido|Atete, Puchol, Abiya, Tata, Puljoy, Ukudi,
Ulunyi, Agenga, Dipaich,Etyel|1,283|23,131|63,091|\n|Dimma|Okugo|Merkes, Dima 1 and 2, Dina, Akobodar,
Bondira, Gedu, Achonya|9,262|23,500|7,591|\n|Abol|Jewe|Jewe, Elchoy, Bonga, Koben|3,196|16,667|47,817|\n|Itang|Terkedi and
Kule|Pulkod, Aduwang, Pukuma, Achewa,
Watgach, War, Drong, Bazyel|24,218|48,693|100,150|\n|Subtotal|||||218,649|\n|**TOTAL POPULATION**|**TOTAL POPULATION**|**TOTAL POPULATION**|**485,130**|**1,583,229**|**604,908**|\n\n\n54\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Subtotal",
+ "confidence": 0.5220153331756592,
+ "start": 287,
+ "end": 288
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Subtotal",
+ "confidence": 0.6127281188964844,
+ "start": 415,
+ "end": 416
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tigray National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.5347378849983215,
+ "start": 437,
+ "end": 441
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Tigray National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.636023759841919,
+ "start": 428,
+ "end": 432
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tigray National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.7327755689620972,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Tigray National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.5482161045074463,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Ethiopian Somali National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.5568872094154358,
+ "start": 623,
+ "end": 628
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopian Somali National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.6583603024482727,
+ "start": 613,
+ "end": 618
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Gambela National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.7161633372306824,
+ "start": 904,
+ "end": 908
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Gambela National Regional State",
+ "confidence": 0.5698515772819519,
+ "start": 904,
+ "end": 908
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TOTAL POPULATION",
+ "confidence": 0.7698718309402466,
+ "start": 1077,
+ "end": 1079
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 68
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Djibouti. It currently hosts about 18,000 refugees, mainly from Djibouti and Eritrea, in Assaita\nand Berahle Camps, respectively _**.**_ The total population in Assaita and Berahle Woredas is about\n155,000, while the total population in the two host kebeles—Hinerie and Berahle 01 —is about\n16,300. Therefore, the refuges size is 110 percent of the total population of the two host kebeles\nand 12 percent of the overall population of the two host woredas.\n\n\n_**Uganda**_\n\n18. Uganda is the third largest refugee-hosting country in Africa. As a result of ongoing\nconflict and instability in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and South Sudan, Uganda\nis currently hosting 512,691 refugees and asylum-seekers in nine districts, mainly in the north,\nsouth, and southwest regions of the country (Map 2.4).\n\n\n**Map 2.4. Refugee-Hosting Locations in Uganda**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n19. Adjumani District hosts the largest number of refugees at 23.8 percent of the total refugee\npopulation, followed by Nakivale and Kampala (table 2.4). The refugees come from 13\ncountries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda,\nBurundi, and Eritrea. Congolese account for 41.7 percent of the total refugees, followed by South\nSudan at 39.4 percent. Refugee numbers in Uganda are among the highest they have ever been.\nFor over five decades, Uganda has been host to refugees and asylum seekers. Since 1961,\nUganda has hosted on average 161,000 refugees per year. There have been three major waves of\nrefugees from Sudan and South Sudan; two waves of refugees from the Democratic Republic of\nCongo; one major wave of refugees from Rwanda; and smaller influxes from Somalia, Burundi,\nand Eritrea.\n\n\n55\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 69
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.4. Refugee Population in Uganda (as of December 31, 2015)**\n\n|Location|Number of refugees|\n|---|---|\n|Adjumani|120,181|\n|Arua|29,483|\n|Kampala|73,769|\n|Kiryandongo|46,315|\n|Kyaka II|27,112|\n|Kyangwali|41,787|\n|Nakivale|98,739|\n|Oruchinga|56,051|\n|Rwamwanja|69,254|\n|**Total**|**512,691**|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n20. However, refugees and refugee-hosting communities are poorer and more vulnerable than\nother communities in Uganda; with settlement areas suffering from lower agricultural\nproductivity and greater environmental degradation due to poor climatic and soil conditions\nand/or overuse. In addition, the basic social services delivery system is weak, and economic\nopportunities are limited because of the remoteness of the settlements and the poor infrastructure.\nThe refugee-hosting areas and the host and refugee populations in the four project districts of\nAdjumani, Arua, Kirynadingo, and Isingiro are presented in table 2.5. These areas are also prone\nto a high prevalence of malaria, respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, and preventable diseases\namong children. Given that the refugee-hosting areas are also among the poorest and leastdeveloped regions in the country, the refugee presence further undermines the ability host\ncommunities in the settlement areas to cope, and this is further exacerbated by limited social\ncapital, a lack of diversity of livelihoods, and few assets.\n\n\n\n**Table 2.5. Host and Refugee Populations in Project Areas in Uganda**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|District|Sub counties|Host Population|Refugee Population|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Adjumani|Adjumani Town Council
Ukusijoni Subcounty
Itirikwa Subcounty
Pakere Subcounty
Dzaipi Subcounty|43,022
11,412
17,051
49,491
42,790|120,181|\n|Arua|Uriama Subcounty
Odupi Subcounty
Rigbo Subcounty|25,030
41,424
31,335|29,483|\n|Kiryandongo|Bweyale Town Council
Kiryandongo Subcounty
Mutunda Subcounty|31,610
80,366
63,785|45,041|\n|Isingiro|Rushasha Subcounty
Isingiro Town Council
Kikagate Subcounty
Ngarama Subcounty
Rugaga Subcounty|25,512
35,061
53,395
36,669
40,851|101,701|\n|**TOTAL POPULATION**|**TOTAL POPULATION**|628,804|296,406|\n\n\n56\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Refugee Population in Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.7354621887207031,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.7652733325958252,
+ "start": 119,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.9427489042282104,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9281351566314697,
+ "start": 120,
+ "end": 121
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7466968297958374,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Host and Refugee Populations",
+ "confidence": 0.8260159492492676,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TOTAL POPULATION",
+ "confidence": 0.9311231970787048,
+ "start": 543,
+ "end": 545
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 70
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "21. Uganda currently has among the more generous and progressive refugee policy\n[frameworks. Its 2006 Refugee Act and 2010 Refugee Regulations entitle refugees to work; to](http://www.refworld.org/docid/4b7baba52.html)\nfreedom of movement; and to Ugandan social services, including access to documents such as\ngovernment IDs and birth, death, marriage, and education certificates. As a matter of policy, all\nrefugees in gazetted settlements are provided with a subsistence agriculture plot (albeit of\ndiminishing size due to overcrowding), but only a few refugees living in settlements on\ncommunally-owned land have more than a small kitchen garden. Refugees in Uganda can own\nproperty and enter into contracts, including land leases. [29]\n\n\n**Legal and Institutional Frameworks Governing Forced Displacement**\n\n22. As is the case in other countries in the HOA, a range of international, regional, and\ndomestic laws, policies, and institutions govern the situation of refugees and internally displaced\npersons in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda. There are three major international and regional legal\ninstruments governing the situation of refugees in the HOA: (i) the 1951 United Nations\nConvention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 Convention); (ii) the 1969 Organization of\nAfrican Unity (OAU) Convention Governing Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa\n(1969 OAU Convention); and (iii) the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region\n(ICGLR) Protocol on the Property Rights of Returning Persons (the ICGLR Property Protocol,\n2006). In addition to adapting international legal instruments (table 2.6), domestic refugee laws\ngovern the situation of refugees in the region.\n\n\n**Table 2.6. International and Regional Legal and Institutional Frameworks**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|COUNTRY|1951
CONVENTION|1967
PROTOCOL|1969 OAU
CONVENTION|RESERVATIONS TO THE 1951
CONVENTION|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Djibouti|09/08/1977|09/08/1977|15/11/2015||\n|Ethiopia|10/11/1969|10/11/1969|15/10/1973|Article 17(2) dealing with wage earning
employment|\n|Uganda|27/09/1976|27/09/1976|24/07/1987|Article 13 dealing with movable and
immovable property
Article 17 dealing with wage-earning
employment|\n\n\n\n23. Almost all refugee laws focus on regulating the process for determining the status of\nasylum seekers and refugees and setting up national refugee agencies, but some domestic refugee\nlaws include provisions relevant to development. But although international and domestic laws\nthat are not refugee-specific have provisions that affect development outcomes, the focus here is\non national and international legal frameworks that are refugee-specific.\n\n\n24. The development-related provisions of the international and domestic refugee laws deal\nwith property rights, freedom of movement, the right to work, and access to services. The 1951\nConvention has provisions dealing with these issues. In addition, the ICGLR Property Protocol\n\n\n[29 Refugees have the explicit right to lease land for up to 49 years under Uganda’s 2013 Land Policy. In practice, however, refugees have limited](http://landportal.info/sites/default/files/the_uganda_national_land_policy-_february_2013.pdf)\naccess to agricultural land, and this is the primary constraint preventing them from moving from subsistence to surplus production.\n30 “Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa.” World Bank, Washington DC.\n\n57\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 71
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "deals with the recovery of refugees’ property and possessions left behind or dispossessed during\ndisplacement. Domestic laws have taken different approaches to address development-related\nissues. For instance, the domestic refugee laws of Djibouti and Ethiopia make no mention of the\nproperty rights of refugees. With regard to freedom of movement, the only domestic refugee law\nthat explicitly provides for freedom of movement for refugees is the 2006 Uganda Refugee Act.\nThe domestic refugee laws of Djibouti and Ethiopia effectively limit refugees’ right to work by\nimposing the same restrictions and conditions on them that are applicable to aliens. On the other\nhand, Article 29 of the 2006 Ugandan Refugee Act provides that refugees will receive treatment\nthat is at least equivalent that that generally accorded to aliens in similar circumstances relating\nto employment and income-generating activities, including: (i) the right to engage in agriculture,\nindustry, handicrafts, and commerce and to establish commercial and industrial companies; (ii)\nthe right to practice a profession, provided that the refugee holds qualifications recognized by the\ncompetent authorities in Uganda; and (iii) the right to access employment opportunities and\nengage in gainful employment. The domestic refugee laws in Ethiopia and Uganda include\nprovisions about extending services to refugees, but those in Djibouti do not. Table 2.7 provides\nan overview of development-related provisions in national and international legal instruments.\n\n\n**Table 2.7. Development-Related Provisions Relevant to Refugees**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Legal Instrument|Property Rights|Freedom of
Movement|Right to Work|Provision of
Services|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|1951 Convention|Articles 13 and 14|Article 26|Articles 17 and 18|Article 22|\n|Djibouti: Ordinance No.
77053/P.R./A.E. Du 1977|||Article 7||\n|Ethiopia: 2004 Refugee
Proclamation||Article 21|Article 21|Article 21|\n|Uganda: Refugee Act 2006|section 29 (1) and
(2)
|section 30
|section 29 (1)|section 29 (1)|\n\n\n25. At the international and regional levels, four legal instruments deal with internally\ndisplaced persons in the Horn of Africa: (i) the United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal\nDisplacement (the Guiding Principles); (ii) the ICGLR Protocol on the Protection and Assistance\nto Internally Displaced Persons (ICGLR IDP Protocol, 2006); (iii) the ICGLR Protocol on the\nProperty Rights of Returning Persons (the ICGLR Property Protocol, 2006); and (iv) the African\nUnion Convention for the Protection and Assistance of IDPs in Africa (Kampala Convention,\n2009). Table 2.8 provides an overview of the membership status of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and\nUganda in in treaties and protocols regarding internally displaced persons.\n\n26. At the national level, most of the institutions dealing with refugee issues are housed in\nministries dealing with security issues. In Djibouti, the Ministry of the Interior is the main\ngovernment institution in charge of refugee protection. The national refugee agency is the\nONARS. In Ethiopia, the ARRA is part of the Security, Immigration and Refugee Affairs\nAuthority. An exception to this trend is Uganda, whose refugee department is part of the Office\nof the Prime Minister, which also has the mandate for the socioeconomic development of\nconflict- and disaster-affected parts of the country.\n\n\n31 “Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa.” World Bank, Washington DC\n\n58\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 72
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 2.8. Membership in Treaties and Protocols Regarding IDPs Among Participating Countries**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Country|ICGLR Protocol on
IDPs|ICGLR Protocol on
Property|AU Kampala Convention|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Djibouti|||Signed|\n|Ethiopia|||Signed|\n|Uganda|Member|Member|Signed and ratified|\n\n\n_Source:_ World Bank [32]\n\n27. None of the domestic refugee laws in the three countries provide a path for a refugee to\nacquire citizenship, and the refugee policies do not allow local integration of refugees. In light of\nthese circumstances, the main focus of this project is to contribute to the effort to find\ntransitional/progressive solutions for refugees while expanding the asylum space by improving\nservice delivery, addressing environmental degradation, and providing livelihood opportunities.\nEven though the project is focused on the needs of host communities, its holistic approach\nensures that refugees will benefit from investments in social infrastructure, environmental\namelioration, and livelihood opportunities. These investments will contribute to better integration\nbetween the refugee and host community economies—a transitional solution to refugee\ndisplacement while durable solutions are found.\n\n\n**Collaboration with the UNHCR**\n\n\n28. Project preparation has involved close collaboration with UNHCR alongside the three\ngovernments to analyze the social, economic, and environmental situation in the refugee-hosting\nareas and to design a project appropriate to address these impacts. UNHCR, together with the\ngovernments, has provided data; has presence, facilities, and operational capabilities; and the\nability to convene various NGOs and local government actors in the refugee-hosting areas. This\nhas facilitated the preparation process immensely.\n\n\n29. UNHCR has been operating in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda for several decades and\nhas field offices in almost every refugee-hosting location in these countries. Its protection, care\nand maintenance, and solutions programs—with a combined total annual budget of over US$400\nmillion—are benefiting over 1.2 million refugees in the three countries. After several years of\nexperience operating in the refugee-hosting areas in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda, UNHCR\nhas a deep understanding of the operational challenges associated with providing services there.\n\n\n30. Because UNHCR has embarked on a solutions-oriented approach to its various\noperations, including the Refugee and Host Community Empowerment (ReHoPE) Program in\nUganda, collaboration with the World Bank on this project will complement their operations and\nwill provide an opportunity to create synergies on a number of aspects, including community\nengagement, capacity support, and developmental investments.\n\n\n31. The proposed operation has been an ongoing collaboration between UNHCR and World\nBank. UNHCR Uganda is providing financial and technical support to the Office of the Prime\nMinister to support the Government of Uganda’s preparation efforts. It is also providing inputs at\n\n\n32 “Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa.” World Bank, Washington DC\n\n59\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration",
+ "confidence": 0.5704494118690491,
+ "start": 538,
+ "end": 543
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.8512638807296753,
+ "start": 454,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8516781330108643,
+ "start": 545,
+ "end": 548
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 73
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "various preparatory workshops organized by World Bank teams and their respective government\ncounterparts to prepare the project. During the implementation phase, UNHCR will work closely\nwith the respective government bodies at the national and local levels to support the\nimplementation of the project and to enhance synergies between the operations of the two\norganizations.\n\n\n60\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 74
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 3: Detailed Project Description**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The DRDIP seeks to demonstrate a fundamental shift in the way forced displacement is\naddressed in the HOA, viewing the issue as a developmental challenge as well as a humanitarian\nand security challenge; fostering a development response that is led and implemented by the\ngovernment, complementing traditional humanitarian agencies; and considering a long-term\nresponse to address the systemic and structural constraints impeding development in underserved\nrefugee-hosting areas that are further exacerbated by the presence of the refugee. Because the\nmajor impacts of forced displacement and categories of investments across the three DRDIP\ncountries is comparable, the four major components, described in detail below, will be\nimplemented in all three countries in a modular and sequenced fashion that is focused on\nmobilization and capacity support for communities and local governments and through an\nimplementation process that is responsive to community priorities.\n\n\n2. The DRDIP seeks to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the\nrefugee presence in the host communities through interlinked technical and investment\ncomponents. _Component 1_ will entail: (i) building the capacity of local government units and\nimplementing agency staff in participatory planning processes; (ii) mobilizing communities and\nestablishing and/or strengthening community institutions for planning, implementation,\nmonitoring, and oversight of subprojects; and (iii) supporting investments in basic social services\nand economic infrastructure. _Component 2_ will focus on: (i) environmental management,\nincluding technical advisory services for the implementation of environmental management\nactivities through a labor-intensive public works mode; and (ii) access to energy sources for\ncooking and lighting, including a potential public–private–people partnership. _Component 3_ will\nsupport: (i) identifying beneficiaries and traditional and nontraditional livelihoods for the project\nto support; (ii) forming community livelihood groups and developing group management\nactivities; and (iii) providing individuals and groups with the requisite technical, business,\nmarket, and financial advisory services. _Component 4_ will support project coordination activities\nat the national, subnational, and local level, including M&E and management information\nsystem, fiduciary management, communication and citizen engagement, and environmental and\nsocial safeguard compliance. _Component 5_ will consolidate regional efforts toward addressing\ndisplacement and mixed migration through policy dialogue and engagement, research, capacity\nsupport, knowledge management, and partnership functions that will then support innovative\nresponses to displacement and mixed migration.\n\n\n**Component 1: Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure (US$85 million)**\n\n3. Refugee-hosting areas in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda are characterized by significant\ndevelopment deficits, including low human capital and limited access to basic social services and\neconomic infrastructure. The service-delivery capacity of local authorities in the three countries\nis also weak. Component 1 aims to improve access to basic social services and economic\ninfrastructure and improve the service-delivery capacity of local authorities at the target\nsubnational and local levels by financing community and strategic investments as well as\ncapacity-support initiatives. Community investments will be matched by community\n\n\n61\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 75
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "contributions, both in cash and in kind (time, materials, and labor). The process will follow a\ncommunity-driven development approach.\n\n\n4. _**Subcomponent 1(a): Community Investment Fund (US$78 million).**_ Subcomponent\n1(a) seeks to improve community access to basic social services and economic infrastructure by\nproviding investment funds that, together with community contributions, will expand and\nimprove service delivery and build infrastructure for local development. Investments will be\nidentified, prioritized, implemented, and monitored by beneficiary communities. Potential\ninvestments (subprojects) include the construction, upgrading, rehabilitation, and/or expansion of\nbasic social services, such as education, water supply, human health, and veterinary care; and\neconomic infrastructure such as rural roads, market structures, and storage facilities (table 3.1).\nThe target community, with guidance from local government, will identify and prioritize the\nspecific social services and economic infrastructure to be funded under this subcomponent\nthrough the community-driven development approach. Only those subprojects that are currently\nfunctioning—that can cover their operating costs and have staff—and those who have a budget\nfor staff and materials provided by their respective administration will be supported, ensuring the\nsustainability of the interventions. For example, improvements to existing schools and health\nfacilities may be funded if the facilities have essential staff who are currently working in\ntemporary or substandard structures.\n\n\n**Table 3.1. Indicative Community Investments**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Area of
Intervention|Community level Investments|Strategic Investments|\n|---|---|---|\n|Health|
Construction, repair or extension of
existing Primary Health Posts only where
health personnel are already present.
Purchase of furniture or equipment for
newly constructed and/or existing centers
Installation of solar power supply systems|
Upgrading/expansion of health
centers or hospitals with
additional wards and an
operation theater
Supply of equipment|\n|Water and
Sanitation, and
Hygiene
(WASH)|
Construction or repair of (nonmotorized)
hand pumps, tanks, dug wells, and haffirs
(cattle troughs).
Motorization of existing high-yield water
sources
Construction of solid waste lagoons
Repair of flood protection infrastructure
(drainage, guttering, dykes, as examples.)|
Expansion of water treatment
plants
Boreholes
Upgrading piped water supply
system|\n|Education|
Construction, upgrading, or rehabilitation
of existing primary schools, including the
construction of additional classrooms,
furniture, and water supply.|
Expansion of secondary
schools with additional
classrooms|\n|Social|
Establishment of community centers||\n|Roads|
Opening of community access roads
Rehabilitation of existing community
access road
Construction or rehabilitation of
footpaths, culverts, and bridges.|
Construction of
intercommunity rural roads for
improved connectivity|\n|Market
infrastructure|
Construction of marketplaces and stalls
Construction of community storage
facilities|
Construction and rehabilitation
of multipurpose markets and|\n\n\n62\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 76
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Col2|warehouses|\n|---|---|---|\n|Livestock|
Construction and/or rehabilitation of
existing veterinary clinics, including
procurement of basic furniture and
medical equipment
Construction and/or rehabilitation of
cattle trough, livestock treatment, and
vaccination facilities (crush)|
Construction and/or
rehabilitation of primary and
secondary livestock markets
Construction and/or
rehabilitation of feed stores|\n\n\n\n5. The component will support strategic investments, larger in scope and impact than the\ntypical community-level investments (subprojects) that will serve a cluster of project beneficiary\ncommunities not more than 20 percent of the total investment envelope. Table 3.2 provides the\ncriteria for the selection of these strategic investments, which will be identified through a\ncommunity prioritization process and which will employ local labor, especially women and\nyouth, during construction. The project will seek to put an information and communication\ntechnology platform, composed of a network of mobile phones and applications, in the hands of\nbeneficiaries and the fund’s managers. The platform will be linked to a web-enabled dashboard,\nwhich could be used to upload data on investments and implementation status on a close-to-realtime basis. Local governments will be responsible for operation and maintenance. The process of\nplanning, implementation, and monitoring of the component have been detailed in the PIM for\neach participating country.\n\n\n\n**Table 3.2. Eligibility Criteria for Strategic Investments**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Summary|Eligibility Criteria|\n|---|---|\n|Demand-driven|Prioritized by participating communities as meeting critical needs.|\n|Shared benefits|Investment will benefit and both the host and refugee communities
involved.|\n|Sustainability|The local government unit guarantees operation and maintenance with a
budget provision and relevant staffing to ensure the investment’s
sustainability.|\n|No significant negative social or
environmental impacts|The proposed investment does not have potential adverse social and
environmental impacts and is not on the negative list.|\n|Implementers are accountable|The proposing institution (usually a district council, but possibly, in
exceptional cases, a province) should meet minimum fiduciary and
registration criteria.|\n|Consistent with local government
unit development plan and capacity|The development plan reflects the investment, and the local government
unit has the capacity to ensure the technical and fiduciary aspects of
implementation and maintenance after completion.|\n|Gap-financing is not a substitute|The proposed investment fills an existing gap but does not substitute for
other available sources of funds.|\n\n\n\n6. _Implementation modalities._ Planning for all three investment components will be\nundertaken as a single exercise. A community development plan will be developed and agreed to\nthat, based on a community-level mapping exercise, identifies and prioritizes subprojects, areas\nto be addressed under environmental rehabilitation, and potential livelihoods. The process will\nfollow a three step process: (a) an initial sensitization, awareness raising, and communications\nabout project-supported investments, eligibility criteria, implementation modalities, roles of\ndifferent stakeholders, and rules of participation; (b) mapping of the existing situation, including\nresources and gaps; identification of needs and prioritization of investments; establishment of a\n\n63\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Table 3.2",
+ "confidence": 0.7624486684799194,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "project beneficiary\ncommunities",
+ "confidence": 0.8097049593925476,
+ "start": 154,
+ "end": 157
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data on investments and implementation status",
+ "confidence": 0.6685829162597656,
+ "start": 258,
+ "end": 264
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "participating country",
+ "confidence": 0.8401119709014893,
+ "start": 299,
+ "end": 301
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Eligibility Criteria for Strategic Investments",
+ "confidence": 0.7409433722496033,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "country",
+ "confidence": 0.604744017124176,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 301
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community-level mapping exercise",
+ "confidence": 0.8031246662139893,
+ "start": 586,
+ "end": 589
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 77
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "community development committee to facilitate community participation and project\nimplementation; and (c) finalization of the committee by ensuring synergies with the existing\ndevelopmental plan and other ongoing interventions and to prevent duplication.\n\n\n7. _**Subcomponent 1(b): Capacity Support for Local Planning and Decentralized Service**_\n_**Delivery (US$7 million)**_ . Subcomponent 1(b) will seek to improve the service-delivery capacity\nof local-level government authorities. It will support capacity support interventions for local\ngovernment authorities and local implementing institutions in the areas of community-driven\nplanning process, local development management, service-delivery capacities enhancement,\nmainstreaming of project interventions with government development planning and budgeting\nprocess, coordination of potential development stakeholders at local-level and community-level\ndevelopment learning. Capacity support activities to be financed under the project, have been\ndetailed in the PIMs, including: (i) supplying critically needed items such as office equipment\nand facilities, field gear, vehicles, and technical resources; (ii) preparing, printing, and\ndissemination of technical training materials; (iii) training and development of knowledge and\nskills at all levels, including for technical staff and host communities; and (iv) experience\nsharing. The project will also support technical assistance to reinforce the capacity of specialized\nimplementing agencies, including the recruitment of national and international technical\nassistance for the planning, engineering design, procurement, construction management, and\ntechnical monitoring of physical investments.\n\n\n**Component 2: Sustainable Environmental Management (US$33.6 million)**\n\n\n8. Refugee-hosting areas face a severe degradation of their environmental and natural\nresources, including deforestation and the devastation of agricultural and range lands. The\ncontinued presence and influx of refugees exacerbates already severe environmental conditions,\nturning localities into fragile ecosystems. Component 2 aims to ensure that environmental and\nnatural resources are carefully and sustainably managed so they can support current and future\nneeds and livelihoods. The implementation of demand- and supply-side interventions will be\nsupported by the component. Supply-side interventions will support and enhance sustainable\nenvironmental and ecosystem services, including integrated natural resources management and\nsmall-, micro- and household-scale irrigation schemes. Alternative energy sources will aim to\nreduce unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, including risk mitigation and other\nchallenges faced by crisis-affected host communities. Demand-side interventions will seek to\naddress gender issues by reducing drudgery in terms of time and energy spent by women and\ngirls collecting wood for fuel, lowering their exposure to risk of violence while collecting it, and\nimproving health and indoor air pollution through the use of cleaner fuels and fuel-saving\ncooking technologies. These aspects have been detailed in the individual PIM for each country.\n\n\n9. _**Subcomponent 2(a): Integrated Natural Resources Management (US$26.8 million)**_ _._\nSubcomponent 2(a) intends to enhance the productivity of environmental and natural resources,\nincluding arresting the degradation of fragile ecosystems in forest, range, and agricultural lands.\nIt would support soil and water conservation through biological and physical activities on\nindividual farms and communal lands, including the construction of soil bunds, stone bunds,\nartificial waterways, cut-off drains, check dams (gully rehabilitation), bench terraces, hillside\nterraces, trenches, area closures, planting of multipurpose trees, and groundwater recharge\ninterventions. Capacity support activities will include those that enhance the implementation of\n\n\n64\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 78
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "_integrated natural resources management_, including technical assistance to service providers at\nvarious levels. The planning and implementation processes and procedures of integrated natural\nresources management will follow a watershed management approach and will be implemented\nusing the national Community Based Participatory Watershed Development Guidelines for each\nparticipating country.\n\n\n10. The area under irrigation will be increased through rehabilitating, improving, or\nupgrading existing traditional and modern small-, micro-, and household-scale irrigation systems\nand/or establishing new ones. The small-scale irrigation support will include financing the\nrehabilitation and improvement of head works, conveyance systems, on-farm irrigation\nstructures, water application methods, and other aspects to provide the higher standard of water\ncontrol needed to improve yields and increase cropping intensity. The support to micro- and\nhousehold-scale irrigation systems will include activities such as small stream diversions;\nconstruction of ponds, hand-dug shallow wells, and shallow tube wells; supply of engine and\nmanual pumps; construction of check dams and springs; water harvesting and micro irrigation\ntechnologies and structures. The use of remote sensor technologies installed on water pumps at\nthe farm level could be considered for monitoring water use to inform water management\ndecisions. The planning and implementation of this will be carried out using the Small-Scale\nIrrigation Development and Management Guidelines for each participating country.\n\n\n11. _Implementation modalities._ The component will be implemented using the laborintensive public works modality, as appropriate, with dual objectives: (i) provide temporary\nemployment for poor people through the labor-intensive public works activities; and (ii) create\ncommunal assets of value for the community. The temporary employment created by the laborintensive public works will enable poor households to earn wages, which will allow them to\nsmooth their consumption gaps, help them sustain their assets, and enable them to participate in\nsavings schemes, which in turn will enable them to invest in productive ventures. The\ndevelopment of physical assets will result in improvements to the environment, which in turn\nwill have a positive impact on households’ productive ventures. This component builds on\nlessons learned from the existing range of public works programs in Uganda and other SubSaharan African countries (for example, Ethiopia and Tanzania).\n\n\n12. The labor-intensive public works will support interventions for establishing and\nmanaging tree nurseries; planting seedlings; promoting afforestation; constructing different soil\nand water conservation mechanisms and flood control structures; building community ponds,\nhand-dug wells, and natural spring developments; and developing mechanisms for rainwater\nharvesting. It will help with the creation of the small-, micro- and household-level irrigation\nsystems, including rehabilitation and improvement of head works, conveyance systems, on-farm\nirrigation structures, small stream diversions, construction of ponds, hand-dug shallow wells,\nconstruction of check dams, and springs, water harvesting, and micro-irrigation structures.\n\n\n13. _**Subcomponent 2(b): Access to Energy (US$6.8 million).**_ Subcomponent 2(b) seeks to\nimprove the host communities’ access to energy by promoting the better use of energy resources\nand increasing access to alternative sources of energy. Support will be given to interventions that\naddress the host communities’ energy requirements, such as domestic cooking and lighting;\nsocial services, such as schools and health services; and productive activities, including lighting\nfor small shops and businesses and for manufacturing and processing. Household cooking is\n\n\n65\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 79
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "currently based on firewood and charcoal. To address this concern, improved cooking devices\nwill be introduced with appropriate community consultations about methods of cooking and\nbaking and what types of firewood are locally available. Training would be provided on the use\nof the new devices, including the preparation of fuel. Attention would be given to monitoring\nuse, regular maintenance, and repairs. Solar lanterns and lamps are among the options for\nmeeting home and street lighting as well as mobile phone charging needs. Establishing\nconnections to grids—where possible—and off-grid decentralized energy supplies that are based\non renewables and diesel engines will be explored in cooperation with other projects (World\nBank and other funding sources) for meeting the above-mentioned and other productive energy\nuses.\n\n\n**Component 3: Livelihoods Program (US$36.85 million)**\n\n\n14. Refugee-hosting communities derive their incomes from traditional livelihoods, such as\nagriculture, fisheries, pastoralism, and agropastoralism; and/or from nontraditional livelihoods,\nsuch as skills-based jobs, service enterprises, and small businesses. Both types are characterized\nby low-level technologies and skills, resulting in inherent low productivity. The lives and\nlivelihoods of people in target communities are impoverished, and their incomes levels are low\nand unsustainable. The objective of this component is to improve livelihoods and increase\nincomes of communities hosting refugees. The component will support interventions aimed at\nimproving the productivity of traditional and nontraditional livelihoods. It will target poor\nhouseholds based on vulnerability, including the elderly and people with disabilities, and priority\nwill be given to women and youth—at least 50 percent of beneficiaries are expected to be\nfemale. The component will target existing groups and support the formation of new ones.\nNontraditional livelihoods will be identified based on a market assessment to impart skills for\nincreased employability and enterprise development and to promote other income-generating\nactivities. The traditional and nontraditional livelihoods will be identified based on a technical\nand market assessment to impart skills to increase production, improve market linkages, and\npromote better adoption of best practices. Key elements to consider with regard to the economic\necosystem include informal enterprises and firms; the nascent presence of the private sector;\nother non-World Bank efforts; and potential innovations for scale-up. Establishment and/or\nstrengthening of community-based institutions will also be an important investment under this\ncomponent.\n\n\n15. _**Subcomponent 3(a): Support to Traditional and Nontraditional Livelihoods (US$31.4**_\n_**million).**_ Subcomponent 3(a) aims to increase the production and productivity of agriculture\n(crops and livestock), pastoralism (livestock), agropastoralism (crop and livestock) and fisheries,\nand to commercialize livelihood activities for improved incomes, employment, and self-reliance\namong refugees. Key activities to be supported will depend on the potential of the region and the\nlocality as well as the traditional form of livelihoods practiced. The subcomponent will be based\non a market-system approach, [33] presented in figure 3.1. A market system is a dynamic space,\nincorporating resources, roles, relationships, rules, and results, [34] and one in which private and\n\n\n\n33 “The central idea is that the poor are dependent on market systems for their livelihoods. Therefore changing those market systems to work more\neffectively and sustainably for the poor will improve their livelihoods and consequently reduce poverty” (DCED—The Donor Committee for\nEnterprise Development: http://www.enterprise-development.org/page/m4p#OverviewandStrategy).\n34 USAID (United States Agency for International Development. 2013. “Local Systems: A Framework for Supporting Sustained Development.”\n\n\n\nUSAID, Washington, D.C.\n\n\n\n66\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 80
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "public actors [35] collaborate, coordinate, and compete for the production, distribution, and\nconsumption of goods and services. The behavior and performance of these actors are influenced\nby the decisions of other actors, rules, incentives, and the physical environment. Market systems\nare composed of vertically and horizontally linked firms and the relationships embedded in these\nlinkages; end, input, and support-service markets; and the environment in which they operate,\nwhich may include sociocultural, geographic, and political factors; infrastructure; and\ninstitutions. Understanding and analyzing the market system will help make systemic change that\ncan create lasting, inclusive growth.\n\n16. Support will include improved production practices; access to technology and equipment,\nto storage and processing infrastructure, and to finance, mobilization and selection of beneficiary\ngroups; formation of common interest groups (CIGs); and strengthening capacities of producer\ncooperatives for accessing input and output markets. The proposed interventions will be\ninformed from lessons learned, will build on the experience of implementing agencies, and will\nbe tailored to country contexts.\n\n17. Traditional livelihood intervention areas were identified based on key stakeholder and\ncommunity consultations, but an in-depth technical and market assessment will inform\nimplementation. Table 3.3 outlines the indicative intervention areas across the three countries.\n\n\n**Table 3.3. Traditional Livelihoods Indicative Intervention Areas**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Ethiopia|Uganda|Djibouti|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Key
intervention
areas|Four main intervention
areas:
(i) Agriculture,
(ii) Livestock
(iii) Fisheries, focused in
Gambela and Benishangul
(iv) Honey, focused in
Gambela and Benishangul|Four main intervention areas:
(i) Agriculture
(ii) Livestock
(iii) Apiary (Honey)
(iv) Fisheries—Nakivale,
Adjumani, and Arua, focused
on fish farming (ponds)|Three main intervention
areas:
(i) Agriculture
(ii) Livestock
(iii) Fisheries (in Obock)
|\n|Existing
Experience
|AGP, PCDP, RPLRP|Northern Uganda Social Action
Fund (NUSAF) 1 and 2 Projects|Rural Community
Development and Water
Mobilization Project
(PRODERMO), IFAD
Program to Reduce
Vulnerability In Coastal
Fishing Area, FAO
Restoration and Protection of
Food Security and
Livelihoods|\n\n\n\n18. Nontraditional livelihoods will be identified based on a market assessment to impart\nskills for increased employability and enterprise development and to promote other incomegenerating activities. The support will involve mobilization and the selection of beneficiary\ngroups, the formation of CIGs, providing skills training and capacity support, preparation of\nlivelihood business plans, easier access to finance for livelihood activities, and regular technical\nand business advisory support and follow up. The design of nontraditional livelihoods will be\nguided by following principles: (i) priority will be given to poor and vulnerable people,\nespecially women and youth, who will be identified by the community through a transparent and\n\n35 Generally, the ideal is for private-sector actors to deliver goods and services, and public-sector actors to set and enforce the rules. However, in\nreality in many markets around the world, these roles are not so clearly differentiated.\n\n67\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 81
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "participatory process; (ii) a CDD approach will be used to ensure community participation at all\nsteps; (iii) interventions will be built on existing strengths and experience of implementing\nagencies as well as self-help initiatives within the host communities; (iv) there will be an\nemphasis on simple designs that focus on community interests, capacities, and local market\ndemand; and (v) an integrated approach will be taken to mainstream nontraditional livelihoods\ninto government systems for its sustainability. Table 3.4 outlines the indicative nontraditional\nlivelihood intervention areas across the three countries.\n\n\n**Table 3.4. Indicative Nontraditional Livelihoods Intervention Areas**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Ethiopia|Uganda|Djibouti|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Key
intervention
areas|Two main interventions:
(i) Youth Livelihoods
Initiative and (ii)
Women Empowerment
and Livelihoods
Initiative
|Three main interventions:
(i) Business training and
enhancement of targeted groups in
which they are already engaged in
(ii) Skills training and provision of
startup kits to targeted groups
(iii) Support to existing local
businesses to help them expand|Three main interventions:
(i) Women’s empowerment
and Self-Employment
Initiative
(ii) Youth Employment
Initiative
(iii) Support to existing
microentrepreneurs|\n|Experience
|(i) PSNP and (2)
Household Assets
Building Programme
(HABP)|NUSAF 1 & 2 Projects|_Agence Djiboutienne de_
_Développement Social_
(Djiboutian Social
Development Agency,
ADDS) supported women
SHG project, Promotion of
Youth Employability and
Handicraft Project, and a
micro-finance initiative
(CPEC)|\n\n\n\n19. An indicative menu of nontraditional livelihood options based on consultations with key\nstakeholders are presented in table C.5. Based on the market assessment, a long list of livelihood\noptions for beneficiaries will be developed for targeted areas, which will exclude categories of\nlivelihoods with limited market demand and higher risks.\n\n\n20. _Criteria for beneficiary identification:_ Women and youth from the most vulnerable\nhouseholds will be targeted to be mobilized into CIGs through the community participatory\nprocess on a priority basis. For traditional livelihoods, beneficiary selection criteria will further\ninclude but not be restricted to land ownership/user rights for agricultural land and prior\nexperience with agricultural activities and animal husbandry. Other criteria will be guided by the\nlocal context. Wherever possible, implementation agencies will facilitate land access for the\ngroups through the available community land or long-term leases for landless youth and women\nwith prior experience in agriculture.\n\n\n21. The main target group for nontraditional livelihoods will also be youth and women.\nAmong youth, priority will be given to those who have an existing business and who are\ninterested in expanding it, or those who are interested in starting a business and who have prior\nexperience in the proposed business area (table 3.6). While selecting youth beneficiaries, priority\nwill be given to women beneficiaries and those who are members of village/local saving groups.\nAt least 50 percent of youth beneficiaries will be female. Among women, priority will be given\n\n\n68\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 82
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "to particularly poor and vulnerable groups and those with the ability and willingness undertake\nand manage the livelihood activities.\n\n\n\n**Table 3.5. Indicative Menu of Nontraditional Livelihood Options**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Ethiopia|Uganda|Djibouti|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Indicative
livelihood
options| Petty trading
Sand collection
Milling
Shops and
restaurants
Carpentry
Mobile phone
repair
Masonry
Tailoring and
garment cutting
Construction
| Tailoring and garment cutting
Briquette production
Shops and restaurants
Hair dressing
Carpentry and joinery
Grinding mills
Motorbike repair
Bicycle repair
Mobile phone repair
Local artisans/artists
|
Stone crushing/cutting
Handicrafts
Sewing training center
Bakery/bread-making
Women’s salon/hair
styling
Driving training and
licenses
Garage and tire station
Welding
Plumbing
Cafeteria and video
game shop
|\n\n\n\n**Table 3.6. Criteria for Beneficiary Identification**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Key Intervention Areas|Criteria for Beneficiary Identification for Nontraditional Livelihoods|\n|---|---|\n|Youth Livelihoods
Initiative
or
Support existing local
business to help them
expand
or
Skills training and
providing start-up kits to
youth
|
Ages 18–35, male and female
Either have an existing business, have prior work experience in the proposed
business, or have an interest in starting a business
No outstanding loan from a formal financial institution
Member of family lived in the host community for at least three years
Priority will be given to: (i) females (at least 50 percent), and (ii) those who are
members of village/local saving groups
Exclusion criteria: Youth found to be alcoholics or drug addicts
Method for identifying the participant: Participatory Rural Appraisal, followed by the
local government unit verification
|\n|Women Empowerment
and
Livelihoods Initiative
or
Self-Employment
Initiative|
From needy households; preference for most vulnerable, including widows amd
the destitute
Capable of work with no outstanding loan
Lack productive assets and/or formal employment
Members of families who have lived in the host community for at least three
years
Method for identifying needy household: Participatory wealth ranking at the
community level|\n\n\n69\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 83
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "22. The subcomponent will follow a process-driven approach for systematic implementation.\nThis process will be common for both traditional and nontraditional livelihoods and will consist\nof three phases: (i) preparatory; (ii) livelihood business plan subproject generation and approval;\nand (iii) livelihood business plan subproject implementation, follow up mentoring and\ncommissioning phase (see figure 3.1). The interventions for traditional livelihoods will be\nimplemented by the relevant departments in relevant ministries.\n\n\n**Figure 3.1. Traditional and Nontraditional Livelihoods Implementation Process**\n\n\n23. _Implementation modalities._ The subcomponent will support the development of\ninnovative solutions to specific production or business problems identified by communities. This\nwill take the form of an innovation fund that finances proposals coming from refugee-hosting\ncommunities who are organized in groups. The innovations could include technological,\ninstitutional and process innovations to be determined during implementation. Support programs\nfor youth and women in technological innovations like digital commerce and in information\ntechnology-enabled services that require computer and digital literacy could support modern and\nsalaried jobs.\n\n\n24. _**Subcomponent 3(b): Capacity Support of Community-Based Organizations for**_\n_**Livelihoods (US$5.45 million)**_ . Subcomponent 3(b) is intended to improve the service-delivery\ncapacity of farmer, pastoral, or agropastoral organizations, including community-based\norganizations. Establishing and building the capacity of community-based organizations is\ncentral to the project’s CDD approach to implementation and for the sustainability of project\ninvestments. Community-based organizations involved in livelihoods promotion, including\nfarmer organizations, cooperatives, and common-interest groups, will receive training in group\nmanagement, savings, financial literacy, and bookkeeping. These community-based\norganizations will be trained in group management, savings, financial literacy, and book keeping,\nand will be encouraged to hold regular meetings, save, inter-loan, make timely repayments, and\nkeep up-to-date books of accounts. These efforts will be coordinated by the local administration\ntechnical committees, which will have overall responsibility of capacity support. Both the\ntraditional and nontraditional livelihoods will be implemented through CIGs. These capacity\nsupport efforts of CIGs will be coordinated by the respective implementing agency with the\n\n\n70\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 84
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "overall responsibility for capacity support. The capacity support of CIGs will follow a cascading\napproach as outlined in figure 3.2.\n\n\n**Figure 3.2. Capacity Support for Common Interest Groups under Traditional and**\n\n**Nontraditional Livelihoods**\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management and Monitoring and Evaluation (US$14.55 million)**\n\n\n25. Project management and implementation will follow a decentralized approach using\nexisting government structures at the national, subnational, and local levels and community\ninstitutions established at the local level. The objective of this component is to ensure enhanced\nand effective project management, coordination, and implementation, and that project activities\nare implemented as planned, implementation is progressing well, and the PDO is being achieved.\n\n\n26. The component will support the establishment of a number of institutions with various\nsets of roles and responsibilities at multiple levels, including oversight, coordination, and\ntechnical bodies. To this end, steering committees will be established at the national, subnational,\nand local levels; they will be chaired by heads of lead implementing agencies or their designees\nat the national sub-national and local levels; members will include the heads and/or their\nrepresentatives of the various project implementing agencies as well as other relevant\nstakeholders. The main responsibility of a steering committee is to provide oversight and\nstrategic guidance regarding project management, coordination, and implementation, including\napproving the annual work plan and budget. Technical committees will also be established at the\nnational, subnational, and local levels; they will be chaired by the directors, department heads,\nand/or their designees of lead implementing agencies at the various levels and constituted by\nexpert focal persons drawn from the various directorates/departments of implementing agencies\nand relevant stakeholders. They will be responsible for providing technical support to the\nsteering committees, implementing agencies, and PCUs which will be established at the national,\n\n\n71\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 85
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "subnational, and local levels in Ethiopia, a project implementation team will be established in\nDjibouti, and a PIST will be established at the national level in Uganda; and adequately staffed\nwith technical experts that are recruited through a competitive process in all three countries.\nThese units will play a coordination and facilitation role. At the community level, the project will\nbuild on existing structures, such as community development committees, but it will also\nestablish new local-level institutions, as appropriate, including community facilitation teams,\ncommunity project management committees, community procurement committees, and social\naudit committees.\n\n\n27. The component will also support the design of the project’s M&E system to be detailed\nin the M&E manual. Key activities include designing the project’s management information\nsystem for monitoring inputs, outputs, and processes; evaluation of outcome and impacts;\nenvironmental and social safeguard monitoring; and participatory monitoring and evaluation and\ninternal learning. M&E activities will also include regular monitoring of implementation\nprogress and performance; independent process monitoring, including regular assessments of\ncommunity-level planning and a review of the effectiveness and quality of capacity support\nefforts; outcome and impact evaluations at baseline, mid-term, and end of project; and annual\nthematic studies. The project’s Results Framework will be used as a basis for reporting progress\nagainst indicators, including progress toward achieving the PDO and implementation progress.\nThe project will consider the use of mobile technologies to increase the reach and frequency of\ndata-capturing at the local level and aggregating the data in a platform that could serve as a\ndashboard. Such a tool would provide near-real-time monitoring and the ability to visualize\nand/or geolocalize activities supported by the project in the three countries.\n\n\n**Component 5: Regional Support for Coordination, Capacity and Knowledge (US$5**\n**million)**\n\n\n28. The key objective of this component is to support the establishment of the Regional\nSecretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration, primarily for the HOA, but with\nrelevant linkages to the Great Lakes Initiative. The Secretariat will: (i) spearhead the\nadvancement of the development approach to displacement in the HOA; (ii) facilitate knowledge\ncreation in partnership with relevant think tanks and/or universities in the three project countries\nof Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda and the HOA; emerging from the implementation of the\nDRDIP with respect to development solutions to forced displacement; (iii) ensure annual\nlearning and sharing workshops for all the HOA countries; and (iv) contribute to a better\nunderstanding of the nexus between socioeconomic development, forced displacement, and\nmixed migration in the HOA by commissioning studies and/or focused research. Advocacy for\nholistic regional responses to forced displacement and mixed migration will be supported by data\ngenerated on displacement that would influence intervention in member states.\n\n\n29. The key thrust areas for the Regional Secretariat will include: (i) engaging in policy\nthrough initiating dialogues with academic and research institutions on transitional solutions on\ndisplacement; (ii) generating evidence through research for innovative management of forced\ndisplacement and mixed migration; (iii) building capacity of countries and institutions in the\nHOA to innovatively respond to the displacement–migration nexus; (iv) providing knowledge\nmanagement and M&E; (v) forging partnerships between humanitarian and development actors\nin the IGAD region to rethink the application of durable solutions; and (vi) consolidating the\n\n\n72\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 86
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "capacity of IGAD to respond to forced displacement and mixed migration and to be a strong\nactor on these issues and discussions affecting the HOA, both regionally and internationally. The\ndetails of the activities and operationalization of the Regional Secretariat are presented in Annex\n8.\n\n\n30. **Project synergies.** Other World Bank-financed projects are active in each country, and\nthe DRDIP builds on successful approaches under these projects, as reflected in table 3.7.\n\n\n**Table 3.7. Active World Bank Projects Related to the DRDIP**\n\n\n\n**Djibouti** Rural Community\nDevelopment and\nWater Mobilization\nProject (P117355)\n\n\n\nRural Community Obock Town Increase access of rural communities to water and\nDevelopment and enhance their capacity to manage water and\nWater Mobilization agropastoral resources using a participatory approach\nProject (P117355) to community-based development.\n\nCrisis Response— Obock and Holl- Support the provision of short-term employment\nSocial Safety Net Holl opportunities in community-based labor-intensive\nProject (P152903) works for the poor and vulnerable. This project is also\n\n\n\nCrisis Response— Obock and Holl- Support the provision of short-term employment\nSocial Safety Net Holl opportunities in community-based labor-intensive\nProject (P152903) works for the poor and vulnerable. This project is also\n\nbeing implemented by the _Agence Djiboutienne de_\n_Développement Social_ (Djiboutian Social\nDevelopment Agency, ADDS).\nImproving Health Obock, Holl-Holl, Improve the utilization of quality healthcare services\nSector Performance and Ali Adeh for maternal and child health and communicable\nProject (P131194) disease control programs.\n\n\n\nObock and HollHoll\n\n\n\nObock, Holl-Holl,\nand Ali Adeh\n\n\n\nImprove the utilization of quality healthcare services\nfor maternal and child health and communicable\ndisease control programs.\n\n\n\n**Ethiopia** Ethiopia Water Supply,\nSanitation, and\nHygiene Project\n(P133591)\n\nPastoral Community\nDevelopment Project\nIII (P130276)\n\n\n\nOne kebele each in\nfour regions except\nTigray\n\n\nBoth participating\nkebeles in Afar and\none kebele in\nEthiopian Somali\nregions\n\n\n\nSupport increased access to improved water supply\nand sanitation services for residents\n\n\nEnhance growth and stability of incomes, increase\nasset base, and improve access to public services\namong pastoral communities.\n\n\n\nProductive Safety Net\nProgram (PSNP-IV)\n(P146883)\n\n\n\nProductive Safety Net Nine kebeles Increase access to safety net and disaster risk\nProgram (PSNP-IV) across four regions management systems, complementary livelihoods\n(P146883) except Tigray services, and nutrition support for food-insecure\n\nhouseholds in rural Ethiopia.\nEthiopia Health National program Improve the delivery, use, and quality of basic health\nMillenium services for women, children, and people affected by\nDevelopment Goals communicable diseases.\nSupport Operation\n(P123531)\n\n\n\nNine kebeles\nacross four regions\nexcept Tigray\n\n\n\nNational program Improve the delivery, use, and quality of basic health\nservices for women, children, and people affected by\ncommunicable diseases.\n\n\n\nEthiopia General National program Improve the quality of general education (grades 1–\nEducation Quality 12) throughout the country; improve learning\nImprovement Project II conditions in primary and secondary schools and\n(P129828) strengthen institutions at different levels of the\n\neducation administration.\n**Uganda** NUSAF 3 The Both the NUSAF 3 and DRDIP will be implemented\nimplementation of by the Office of the Prime Minister and will use, as\nthe NUSAF 3 and much as possible, the same implementation structures\nthe DRDIP will at the central and local government and community\noverlap in Ajumani levels. This arrangement, in addition to the\nand Arua Districts. community-driven development approach that will be\n\n\n\nEthiopia General\nEducation Quality\nImprovement Project II\n(P129828)\n\n\n\nBoth the NUSAF 3 and DRDIP will be implemented\nby the Office of the Prime Minister and will use, as\nmuch as possible, the same implementation structures\nat the central and local government and community\nlevels. This arrangement, in addition to the\ncommunity-driven development approach that will be\n\n\n\n73\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 87
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "used by both projects, will help avoid duplication of\nefforts and create synergy between the two projects.\n\n\n\n74\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 88
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 4: Implementation Arrangements**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n**Project Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n1. The DRDIP is to be implemented in remote and underserved areas where implementation\ncapacity, including fiduciary and safeguard management, and public participation in local-level\ndecision making processes are limited. However, the design and preparation of the DRDIP is\ninformed by implementation capacities and lessons drawn from other World Bank-supported\nprojects that the respective implementing agencies are responsible for in Djibouti, Ethiopia, and\nUganda.\n\n\n2. In Djibouti, _Agence Djiboutienne de Développement Social_ (Djiboutian Social\nDevelopment Agency, ADDS) is currently implementing three World Bank financed projects,\namounting to an estimated US$18 million: the Second Urban Poverty Reduction Project\n(US$5.6), Social Safety Net Project (US$10 million), and Enhancing Income Opportunities in\nDjibouti (US$2.7 million). The agency is also implementing many other projects sponsored by\nother development partners, including the French Agency for Development, African\nDevelopment Bank, and Islamic Development Bank. Through past and existing projects, ADDS\nhas accumulated significant experience working with local authorities and community\ninstitutions and has gained an understanding of how to manage income-generation projects,\nincluding in the area of microfinance, self-help groups, community-led development\nopportunities, and training.\n\n\n3. In Ethiopia, World Bank-supported projects such as the PCDP, the AGP, and the PSNP,\nfinanced capacity-support activities and devised and implemented robust support and supervision\nmechanisms, including similar projects financed by development partners. In particular, the\ndesign and preparation of DRDIP benefits from the implementation capacity built under the first\ntwo phases of the PCDP (the third and last phase—PCDP III is currently being implemented)\nthat adopted a CDD approach. The PCDP is being implemented in two of the five DRDIP\nimplementing regions: Afar and Ethiopian Somali. The World Bank made enormous investments\nin local-level capacity support and introduced models for participatory local development\nthrough the PCDP. The program also financed the establishment and strengthening of\ncommunity institutions to ensure community ownership of local development and their active\nparticipation in important local-level development decisions. The DRDIP also benefits from the\nimplementation capacity built under the two phases of the AGP and the four phases of the PSNP.\nThe AGP is being implemented in Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambela, and Tigray Regions; and the\nPSNP is being implemented in Tigray, Afar, and Ethiopian Somalia Regions. Both the AGP and\nthe PSNP have financed capacity-support activities aimed at enhancing the capacity of local\ngovernments and communities.\n\n\n4. In Uganda, the DRDIP is designed to utilize existing structures that have been\nimplementing World Bank-financed projects in the OPM will be leveraging established central\nand local government planning and coordination structures. The OPM has been implementing a\nseries of Northern Uganda Social Action Fund projects, financed by an IDA credit since 2003. It\nhas extensive experience in implementation, coordination, and management of community-based\n\n\n75\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 89
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "projects. The design of the DRDIP in Uganda has benefited from the experiences and lessons\nlearned during the implementation of the NUSAF projects; it will also benefit from the existing\nstructure to implement the project.\n\n\n**a.** **Djibouti**\n\n\n_The role of the government and steering committee_\n\n5. The Government is responsible for the project’s overall strategic oversight and for\ncarrying out measures that will guarantee and facilitate project implementation. The Ministry of\nEconomy and Finance will delegate the power of execution to ADDS as an implementing agency\nthrough a convention. ADDS is under the supervision of the Secretariat of State for National\nSolidarity, and the latter will represent the Government for the project.\n\n\n6. A steering committee was already established in a letter dated August 31, 2015, and\nsigned by the Minister of Economy and Finance. The steering committee will be led by the\nSecretary General of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and is composed of General\nSecretaries of the Ministry of Interior; Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Health; Ministry of\nHousing, Urbanism, and Environment; and Ministry of Education and Vocational Training. It\nwill include representatives from the Secretariat of State of National Solidarity, presidents of the\nRegional Council of Obock and Ali-Sabieh, the director of external financing, the director of\nhousing funds, and the director general of ADDS. The role of the steering committee will be to\nprovide overall strategic guidance, reinforce intersector coordination, and oversee project\nimplementation. ADDS will act as the steering committee secretariat.\n\n\n_Implementing agency_\n\n7. Under the Secretary of State in Charge of National Solidarity, ADDS will be the project\nimplementation agency. Project implementation will be carried out leveraging existing\nadministrations and entities (figure 4.1). The main rationale for the proposed institutional and\nimplementation arrangements is to rely on existing institutional structures and staff as much as\npossible to contribute to the strengthening of national capacity.\n\n\n8. ADDS was created in 2008 when two major organizations in the fight against poverty —\nADETIP ( _[Agence djiboutienne de travaux d'intérêt public](http://www.pseau.org/outils/organismes/organisme_resultat.php?org_organisme=Agence%20djiboutienne%20de%20travaux%20d%27int%E9r%EAt%20public&org_organisme_debut=1&org_organisme_fin=1&l=fr&champ_tri_1=pay_pays_fr&champ_tri_2=org_ville&champ_tri_3=sigle_ou_organisme)_ - Djibouti Public Works Agency) and\nFSD ( _Fond Social de Développement –_ Social Development Fund) —merged into a single\ninstitution. Both institutions capitalized on their extensive experience in the fight against poverty\nby implementing infrastructure and utilities projects and promoting income-generating activities\nby providing microcredit.\n\n\n9. ADDS is legally established and fully able to commit to national and international\nobligations with the mission to contribute to the fight against poverty and vulnerability by\nsupporting sustainable development projects in a participatory manner, in partnership and\ncoordination. ADDS is granted the power to implement public programs and projects on behalf\nof the state and local authorities by law and decree of its establishment. Framework agreements\nwill lay down the terms and conditions for the execution of projects and/or programs entrusted\nby the Government of Djibouti to ADDS.\n\n\n76\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 90
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Figure 4.1. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements for Djibouti**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n10. The ADDS’s management staff, including its Director General, are already in place, but a\nspecific PIU will be established within ADDS for the DRDIP. To manage the project, ADDS\nwill need to recruit a project coordinator, an infrastructure engineer, a community specialist, a\nlivelihoods specialist, an environmental and social safeguards specialist, a financial officer, a\nprocurement specialist, and a monitoring and evaluation specialist. Moreover, given the\ndispersion of activities in two areas, two regional antennas will be included in the project in Ali\nSabieh and Obock. The terms of reference for different positions were agreed on between ADDS\nand IDA. Given the human resources available within ADDS, the PIU will lean on the various\ntechnical departments (such as microfinance) as needed for the implementation of field activities.\n\n\n_The role of the regional council and communities_\n\n11. For positive results on the ground, the project will ensure responsiveness to community\nneeds and also community’s ownership of the investments. All the proposed activities will be\napproved by the affected communities. To implement this community approach, regional\ncouncils (Obock and Ali-Sabieh) will serve as links between steering committees and\ncommunities on project activities. Regional councils are elected officials. They will support the\ncommunity engagement, mobilization, participation, and decision making; with respect to other\nproject stakeholders and the implementing agency. They will be responsible for collecting\ninformation from communities and presenting it to the steering committee and in turn\ntransmitting steering committee decisions to the community.\n\n\n**b.** **Ethiopia**\n12. Implementation of DRDIP activities will rely on existing government structures and\nexisting and/or new community institutions. Thus, all levels of government will have roles in\nproviding oversight functions. Government and community institutions will provide technical\n\n77\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 91
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "and implementation support. Implementation will follow a decentralized approach, and local\ncommunities will assume the primary responsibility for executing project activities, including\nidentifying, prioritizing, and implementing community investments. Government implementing\nagencies and community institutions will be supported by PCUs at the federal, regional, and\nworeda levels (figure 4.2). Project teams will also be responsible for coordinating\nimplementation of the project, managing fund flows, ensuring fiduciary and safeguard\nobligations, monitoring performance, maintaining timely and regular physical and financial\nreports, and documenting best practices and lessons learned.\n\n\n_**National-Level Project Oversight, Backstopping, and Implementation Support**_\n\n13. _**Oversight**_ **.** A Federal Steering Committee (FSC) chaired by the head of the MoANR or\ndesignee will be established consisting of heads of relevant implementing agencies and directors\nof relevant directorates within MoANR and other relevant ministries and federal-level\nimplementing agencies, including Ministry of Finance and Economic Cooperation. The main\nresponsibility of the committee is to provide strategic guidance and oversight on project\nmanagement, coordination, and implementation, including approving the annual work plan and\nbudget. The terms of reference for the FSC, including structure and membership, are in the PIM.\n\n\n14. _**Backstopping.**_ A Federal Technical Committee (FTC) will be established, chaired by the\ndirector of emerging regions coordination directorate of MoANR and consisting of technical\nexperts drawn from relevant directorates within MoANR as well as from other relevant\nministries and agencies. The main responsibility of the federal technical committee is to provide\ntechnical backstopping to the FSC, including technical review of the annual work plan and\nbudget and implementation issues that require the attention and decision of the committee. The\nterms of reference of the federal technical committee, including structure and membership, are in\nthe PIM.\n\n\n15. _**Implementation support**_ **.** MoANR will host the project and will be the lead\nimplementing agency. It will support project implementation through a FPCU to be established\nand housed in its jurisdiction. The unit’s structure and terms of reference for each position within\nit are in the PIM. The FPCU will perform the following functions:\n\n\n(i) Coordinate the implementation of project activities at the federal level;\n(ii) Ensure fiduciary and safeguard compliance, including supervision, monitoring\n\nand capacity support, for agencies involved in the implementation of project\nactivities at regional and woreda levels;\n(iii)Monitor overall performance, provide regular financial and progress reports to\n\nMoANR and the World Bank, and evaluate the project’s impact and assessment\nof progress toward the PDO;\n(iv)Liaise with other stakeholders and engage in public communications;\n(v) Strengthen capacity to implement and monitor project activities at all levels; and\n(vi)Mobilize external technical support as necessary.\n\n16. Directorates in MoANR and other project implementing ministries and agencies will\nassist regional bureaus and woreda offices, as appropriate, in the implementation of project\nactivities. They will also engage in capacity support activities, including sensitization and\nawareness raising about the project in general and about CDD principles, fiduciary and safeguard\n\n\n78\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 92
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "management, monitoring and evaluation, gender issues, and facilitation skills. Capacity-support\ninitiatives around development learning and knowledge management; the identification and\ndevelopment of livelihood opportunities; and the design, construction, and quality assurance of\nsocial and economic infrastructure will also be supported.\n\n\n_**Regional-Level Project Oversight, Backstopping, and Implementation Support**_\n\n17. _**Oversight**_ _._ A regional steering committee (RSC) will be established, chaired by the head\nof the Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources and/or by the head of the\nBureaus/Commissions of Pastoral Development or his/her designee, and consisting of the heads\nof the relevant (project-implementing) sector offices (bureaus), including the Bureau of Finance\nand Economic Cooperation (BoFEC). The main responsibility of the RSC is to provide strategic\nguidance and oversight regarding project management, coordination and implementation at a\nregional level, including approving the annual work plan and budget for the region. The terms of\nreference for the FSC, including structure and membership, are included in the PIM.\n\n\n18. _**Backstopping.**_ A Regional Technical Committee (RTC) will be established, chaired by\nthe Process Owner of the relevant Process (head of department) and consisting of technical\nexperts drawn from relevant Processes within Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources\nand/or the Bureau/Commission of Pastoral Development as well as from Processes of other\nsector offices. The main responsibility of the regional technical committee is to provide technical\nsupport to the RSC, including technical review of the annual work plan and budget for the region\nand implementation and coordination issues that require the attention and decision of the RSC.\nThe terms of reference of the RTC, including membership, are included in the PIM.\n\n\n19. _**Implementation support**_ . Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources and/or the\nBureau/Commission of Pastoral Development will support project implementation through the\nexisting Regional Project Coordination Unit (RPCU) housed in its jurisdiction. The structure of\nthe unit and terms of reference for each position within it are included in the PIM. The RPCU\nwill perform the following functions:\n\n\ni. Coordinate the implementation of project activities at the regional level;\nii. Ensure fiduciary and safeguard compliance, including supervision, monitoring and\ncapacity support, for agencies involved in the implementation of project activities at\nthe regional and woreda levels;\niii. Monitor overall performance, providing regular financial and progress reports to the\nBureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources and the FPCU;\niv. Liaise with other stakeholders and engage in public communications at the regional\nlevel;\nv. Strengthening capacity to implement and monitor project activities at regional and\nworeda levels; and\nvi. Mobilize external technical support as necessary.\n\n20. Sector bureaus and offices at the regional and zonal levels will assist woreda- and kebelelevel offices and institutions implement project activities and will engage in capacity-support\nactivities. They will provide support to woredas for all the activities carried out at this level,\nincluding sensitization and awareness raising on CDD principles; facilitation of community-level\nplanning; establishment or strengthening of community institutions, procurement, and financial\n\n\n79\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 93
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "management; social and environmental assessments; identification and development of\nlivelihood opportunities; and design, construction, and quality assurance of social and economic\ninfrastructure.\n\n\n_**Woreda-Level Project Oversight, Backstopping, and Implementation Support**_\n\n21. _**Oversight**_ : At the woreda level, project oversight will be provided by the Woreda\nCouncil, which will serve as the Woreda-level Steering Committee (WSC). The council, chaired\nby the woreda administrator or deputy is composed of heads of various sector offices, including\npastoral development and/or agriculture, water, education, health, rural roads, small and\nmicroenterprises agency, cooperative promotion, finance, and representatives of NGOs active in\nthe woredas as well as representatives from microfinance institutions, if available. The council is\nultimately responsible for all woreda-level project activities, including approval of the woredalevel annual work plan and budget. The Woreda Council will closely collaborate with RPCUs to\ndeliver on project activities, including facilitating capacity-support activities.\n\n\n22. _**Backstopping**_ . Technical backstopping will be provided by the Woreda-level Technical\nCommittee (WTC), which will be established by recruiting dedicated technical staff (focal\npersons) from the various sector offices responsible for project implementation at the woreda\nlevel. The main responsibility of the woreda technical committee is to facilitate local-level\nplanning, supervise implementation of subprojects, support identification and development of\nlivelihoods, and promote community-level learning. The terms of reference, including\nmembership and periodic meeting schedules for the woreda technical committee are included in\nthe PIM.\n\n\n23. Each woreda will also establish a Woreda Project Appraisal Team with membership from\nthe various sectoral offices, including from woreda offices of finance. The team is separate from\nthe woreda technical committee so that its members have no responsibilities related to\nfacilitation under the project and can therefore maintain a certain measure of independence. The\nmain responsibility of the team is to appraise community investments (subprojects), particularly\nin terms of social and environmental issues, technical soundness, gender equity, consistency with\nthe Woreda Development Plan, and any issues raised by the community audit committees. It will\ncheck readiness of community institutions to implement subprojects, and as the subprojects are\nimplemented, it will confirm the achievement of milestones against disbursed funds.\n\n\n24. _**Implementation support**_ . The Woreda Offices of Pastoral or Development or the Woreda\nOffices of Agriculture and Natural Resources will support project implementation through the\nexisting Woreda Project Coordination Team (WPCT). The team structure and terms of reference\nfor each position are included in the PIM. The woreda PCU will perform the following functions:\n\n\ni. Coordinate the implementation of project activities at the woreda level;\nii. Monitor overall performance and provide regular financial and progress reports to the\nWoreda Offices of Agriculture and Natural Resources and RPCU; and\niii. Liaise with other stakeholders and engage in public communications at the woreda\nlevel.\n\n25. Most of the project’s implementation will be decentralized to the community level, with\nbeneficiary communities assuming the primary responsibility for executing many project\nactivities (as discussed further below). However, a few activities will be implemented at the\n\n80\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "social and environmental assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.8491042852401733,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 6
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Woreda",
+ "confidence": 0.5549195408821106,
+ "start": 65,
+ "end": 66
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "woredalevel annual work plan",
+ "confidence": 0.7022867798805237,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 164
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Woreda",
+ "confidence": 0.660384476184845,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 169
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Woreda Development Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.78987056016922,
+ "start": 382,
+ "end": 385
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "woreda",
+ "confidence": 0.7166466116905212,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "community institutions",
+ "confidence": 0.7723336815834045,
+ "start": 401,
+ "end": 403
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial and progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7312670350074768,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 517
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Woreda",
+ "confidence": 0.6584483981132507,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 94
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "woreda level, such as strategic investments and capacity-support activities for sector offices;\nsupport to advisory services, including strengthening training centers for farmers and pastoralists\nand animal health clinics; and support for the promotion of savings and credit cooperatives and\nmicroenterprise development (if available). This support will be handled by relevant sector\noffices under the guidance of the Woreda Council.\n\n\n_**Community-Level Project Oversight, Backstopping, and Implementation Support**_\n\n26. The project will follow a CDD approach. Communities themselves will be the true\nimplementing agencies of the project. As such, they will identify, prioritize, appraise, implement,\nmonitor, and evaluate the subprojects that are financed through the project. In addition, they will\nparticipate in participatory monitoring, evaluation, and internal learning.\n\n\n27. Successful implementation of the DRDIP’s core interventions will depend on strong\ncommunity institutions. The project will pay particular attention to strengthening existing\ncommunity institutions and building on them. When necessary, it will support the establishment\nof new community institutions. As such, a participatory assessment will be undertaken in each\nkebele to identify community institutions, leadership structures, and groups representing specific\ninterests (such as women, youth, the environment, and culture). The analysis will also include an\nassessment of the way community organizations and groups are organized, such as their\nrepresentation, how they give voice to women and the poor, the level of transparency in their\noperations, internal relationships, and the potential for elite capture.\n\n\n28. _**Oversight.**_ One of the existing community institutions at the kebele level is the Kebele\nDevelopment Committee (KDC), the developmental arm of the Government of Ethiopia’s\nlowest-level administration structure. It will provide general implementation oversight and liaise\nwith and coordinate support from the woreda project coordination team and the woreda sector\noffices or implementing agencies. Instead of establishing a parallel kebele development\ncommittee structure for its purposes, the project will provide support to strengthen existing\ncommittees. However, in view of some of this project’s peculiar features, some members of the\ncommunity will be attached to the KDC for specific functions. For example, representatives from\nsub-kebele levels will join with the KDC to participate in oversight roles and responsibilities.\n\n\n29. _**Backstopping**_ . Technical backstopping will be provided to community institutions by\nexperts (subject-matter specialists) of the various woreda sector offices; woreda technical\ncommittees as well as Woreda Project Appraisal Committees (WAC). The support will include\nfacilitating local-level planning, supervising the implementation of subprojects, supporting\ncommunities in the identification and development of livelihoods, and promoting communitylevel learning. It will also include capacity support of community institutions for better service\ndelivery as well as social accountability.\n\n\n30. _**Implementation support**_ **.** Implementation of project activities at the community level will\nbe supported by community institutions, including existing and new institutions that will be\nestablished. Community institutions will be established to support project implementation as\nneeded, such as a Community Procurement Committee (CPC), a Community Project\nManagement Committee (CPMC), a Community Audit Committee (CAC), and a Community\nFacilitation Team (CFT). The project will provide support to strengthen these institutions. The\n\n\n81\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "participatory assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9703148007392883,
+ "start": 197,
+ "end": 199
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "kebele",
+ "confidence": 0.8831837177276611,
+ "start": 204,
+ "end": 205
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 95
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "terms of reference of the various community institutions, including membership, are included in\nthe PIM.\n\n\n**Figure 4.2. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements for Ethiopia**\n\n\n**c.** **Uganda**\n31. The Office of the Prime Minister will have the overall responsibility for implementing\nand accounting for project funds and coordinating activities under all project components. The\nOPM Permanent Secretary will be assisted by a PIST that will be established under the refugee\ndepartment within the OPM. The PIST will be led by the project coordinator and will include\nspecialists in infrastructure, livelihoods, M&E, and safeguards. This team will provide key\ntechnical support during implementation and in terms of monitoring and evaluation.\n\n\n32. The implementation of the project will be mainstreamed into existing government\nstructures at the national and local government levels. Accordingly, every level of government\nwill have a role in providing oversight and implementation support. Local authorities will be\nresponsible for oversight and coordination of the project’s implementation at the district,\nsubcounty, and community levels. The community will have a leading role in the identification,\nprioritization, and implementation of their prioritized project activities (figure 4.3).\n\n\n33. The PIM sets forth the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders of the project. In\naddition, the PIM includes details of all operational and procedural steps regarding reviews and\napprovals of specific activities, flow of information, detailed description of project management,\n\n82\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 96
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "and implementing bodies, procurement and financial management arrangements, reporting\nrequirements, and manual amendment procedures.\n\n\n**Figure 4.3. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for Uganda**\n\n\n_**National level**_\n\n34. _**Oversight**_ **.** A steering committee, which will meet twice a year, will be responsible for\nproviding oversight for the project’s implementation. The committee will be chaired by the\nPermanent Secretary of Office of the Prime Minister. Members and the terms of reference of the\ncommittee have been identified and detailed in the PIM.\n\n\n35. _**Backstopping**_ **.** The steering committee will be supported by a technical working\ncommittee chaired by the commissioner of refugees and with members drawn from\nrepresentatives of the key sector ministries participating in the implementation of the project,\nincluding the Ministry of Local Government, and the UNHCR. The technical working committee\nwill provide operational and technical oversight and will report to the OPM Permanent Secretary.\n\n\n36. _**Implementation support.**_ The OPM will have overall responsibility for oversight,\naccounting for the project resources, and ensuring successful implementation of the project. The\nOPM and Ministry of Finance, Planning, and Economic Development will be responsible for\nensuring that project resources are budgeted for and disbursed within the national medium-term\nexpenditure framework and that the project accounts are audited. The OPM will also closely\ncoordinate with the Ministry of Local Government to ensure the smooth implementation of the\nproject at the district and subcounty levels.\n\n83\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 97
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "37. The PIST under the Department of Refugees will support the OPM Permanent Secretary\nand her technical team in day-to-day operations, governed by the provisions of PIM and other\nappropriate legal instruments agreed to by the Government of Uganda and IDA. Among other\nfunctions, the PIST will perform, the following:\n\na. Providing technical support to local government implementers in all areas of\n\nproject implementation and capacity support to stakeholders involved in the\nimplementation of project activities at the district and subcounty level;\n\n\nb. Ensuring safeguard compliance of all project activities;\n\n\nc. Managing IDA funds on behalf of the Government of Uganda by ensuring that the\n\nSpecial Account is replenished regularly and the financial reports are submitted\nregularly and in a timely fashion;\n\n\nd. Monitoring overall project performance and submitting project progress reports\n\nregularly and in a timely fashion;\n\n\ne. Procuring goods and services that involve bulk purchases; and\n\n\nf. Documenting lessons for mainstreaming into local authority systems.\n\n\n_**Local government level**_\n\n38. _**Oversight**_ . At the district, subcounty, and parish level, the project will be fully\nmainstreamed into existing structures. The relationship between the local and central\ngovernments under this project will be governed by a memorandum of understanding outlining\nthe responsibilities of the respective parties, which will be reviewed at mid-term to take into\nconsideration emerging lessons from project implementation. The following are the main local\nlevel oversight mechanisms.\n\n\na. **District executive committee.** The district executive committee is responsible for\n\nformulating policy, overseeing the implementation and monitoring of the project,\nand annually reviewing the performance of the project against the approved work\nplans and programs.\n\n\nb. **District council.** District council members will be involved in the incorporation\n\nof approved community subprojects into the sector plans and budgets and\nsubsequently in the development plans and overall budgets. Because DRDIP\nproposals are multi-sectoral, there will be a need for various standing committees\nto actively participate in the integration of DRDIP activities into the district plan,\nespecially at the appraisal stages. The district executive committee will notify the\ncouncil on approved subprojects for funding.\n\n\nc. The **chief administrative officer** is the accounting officer and overall coordinator\n\nof the project at district level. The chief administrative officer, supported by the\nOPM refugee desk officer and the district staff member appointed as a focal\nperson (the DRDIP district officer) will be responsible for the proper execution of\nthe project's activities in the district in line with the requirements stated in the\nPIM.\n\n84\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 98
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "d. In order to ensure the smooth flow and full accountability for the fund’s resources\n\nat the district level, the **district chief finance officer** will undertake accounting\nduties within the prescribed laws of the Government of Uganda, policies and\nprocedures, and the DRDIP PIM.\n\n\n39. _**Backstopping.**_ Technical backstopping will be provided by the district technical planning\ncommittee, community development officers, a subcounty implementation support team,\nUNHCR, and other agencies that are implementing humanitarian and development activities in\nthe refugee settlements and host communities. While the District Technical and Planning\nCommittee (DTPC) and the community development officer are already existing government\nstructures, a subcounty implementation support team will be established for this project.\n\n\na. **District level.** The district technical planning committee will be responsible for\n\nappraisals and technical support during implementation and monitoring of\nsubprojects from the district level. The committee members will be composed of\nrepresentatives from district technical departments, UNHCR, civil society\norganizations, NGOs, inter-faith groups, and the private sector during its meetings\nto deliberate on DRDIP matters. The district technical planning committee will be\nchaired by the district chief administrative officer, and the district planner will\nserve as the secretary.\n\n\nb. **Subcounty level.** The subcounty chief, the community development officer, the\n\nsettlement commandant (OPM), and the assistant community development officer\nare responsible for coordinating project activities at the subcounty and community\nlevel. They will participate in the mobilization of the communities, work with\nsector specialists to provide technical support to the communities, and support the\npreparation and submission of community subprojects and annual plans. They\nwill be supported in their work through a **Subcounty Implementation Support**\n**Team** composed of parish chiefs, representatives from parish development\ncommittees and Local Councils, subcounty extension staff, and refugee welfare\ncouncils at the village, parish, and sub county levels; UNHCR and other agencies\noperating in the area; and contracted community facilitators.\n\n\n40. _**Implementation support.**_ The district administration will support project implementation\nusing the existing local government structures in coordination with the Office of the Refugee\nDesk Officer and that of the Settlement Commandant. A memorandum of understanding\noutlining the responsibilities of the respective parties will govern the relationship between the\ncentral and local government levels under the DRDIP. The memorandum of understanding will\nbe reviewed at the mid-term to take into consideration emerging issues and lessons from project\nimplementation. Local authorities will be responsible for the overall implementation of the\nproject at the district, subcounty, and community levels. The specific functions at the local\ngovernment shall include:\n\n\na. Coordination of the implementation of project activities at the district, subcounty\n\nand community levels;\n\nb. Receive project proposals and coordinate appraisals of subproject proposals by\n\nsector specialists under the auspices of district technical and planning committee;\n\n\n85\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 99
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "c. Forward to OPM a list of approved proposals, duly signed by the chief\n\nadministrative officer, for review and funding;\n\nd. Make arrangements for implementation, support supervision, monitoring,\n\nevaluation, and hand over of subprojects to the beneficiaries;\n\ne. Facilitate the disbursement of funds to subproject accounts by ensuring that the\n\njustification for expenditures are prepared and submitted with complete\ndocumentation and on time;\n\nf. Undertake accounting duties within prescribed laws of Uganda, policies and\n\nprocedures, and the DRDIP PIM;\n\ng. Prepare quarterly and annual physical implementation and financial performance\n\nreports; and\n\nh. Incorporate community activities into the district plans and budgetary framework.\n\n\n_**Community**_\n\n41. _**Oversight.**_ The project will follow a CDD approach whereby communities will play a key\nrole in identifying, prioritizing, and implementing project activities. A community monitoring\ngroup will be elected by the beneficiary community and will be responsible for overseeing the\noverall implementation of the project at the community level. The community monitoring group\nwill be the first recipient of any complaint or appeal regarding the project and will help to\nresolve issues at the community level.\n\n\n42. _**Backstopping**_ . The subcounty chief and the community development officer are\nresponsible for coordinating project activities at the subcounty and community levels. As needed,\nthey will be supported by contracted community facilitators.\n\n\n43. _**Implementation Support.**_ At the community level, all interventions will be initiated and\nprioritized by members of the community, parish chairpersons, Refugee Welfare Committee\nmembers and NGOs, and community-based organizations that are active in the area. A number\nof project-related institutions will support the implementation of the project at the community\nlevel, including: (i) a community project management committee composed of community\nrepresentatives who are responsible for the mobilization and facilitation of the involvement of\ncommunity members and other stakeholders, from identification to implementation and M&E of\nthe project; (ii) the community procurement committee, which will conduct all procurement on\nbehalf of the community; and (iii) the Refugee Welfare Councils whose roles include conflict\nresolution at community level, serve as link between refugees and settlement authorities,\nparticipate in project design and implementation, and also serve as a link between refugees and\nhost communities.\n\n\n**d.** **Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)**\n44. The Regional Secretariat will be a part of the migration program for the Health and\nSocial Development Program based at the IGAD Secretariat in Djibouti. Its program manager in\nthe Economic Cooperation and Social Development Division will provide overall oversight and\nsupervision to the Regional Secretariat (figure 4.4).\n\n\n86\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 100
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Figure 4.4. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for IGAD**\n\n\n45. The Regional Secretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration will be based in\nDjibouti, where the IGAD headquarters is located, and in Nairobi because of its strategic location\nwith regard to humanitarian and development partners such as the World Bank’s Fragility,\nConflict and Violence Regional Unit, whose work is of relevance to the Secretariat. The overall\nfiduciary responsibilities will be with the IGAD finance and administration in Djibouti with a\nsecretariat support office in Nairobi staffed with operations, procurement, and accounts\nspecialists (figure 4.5).\n\n\n**Figure 4.5. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for the Regional Secretariat**\n\n\n87\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 101
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Financial Management, Disbursement, and Procurement**\n\n46. A financial management assessment was conducted on MoANR in Ethiopia, which will\nuse a federal PCU; OPM in Uganda, which will use the PIST under the refugee department;\nADDS [36] in Djibouti, which will use a project implementation team; and the IGAD Secretariat.\nThe assessment was also done at subnational level in four [37] of the five regional bureaus and\nfour [38] of the 16 woredas in Ethiopia. In Djibouti, the assessment covered the two regional offices\nin Obock and Ali Sabieh, and in Uganda, the assessment covered the four districts implementing\nthe project—Adjumani, Arua, Kiryandongo and Isingiro.\n\n\n47. The objective of the assessment was to determine whether the implementing entities have\nacceptable financial management arrangements in place that satisfy the Association’s Operation\nPolicy/Bank Procedure (OP/BP) 10.00. These arrangements would ensure that the implementing\nentities: (i) use project funds only for the intended purposes in an efficient and economical way;\n(ii) prepare accurate and reliable accounts as well as timely periodic interim financial reports;\n(iii) safeguard assets of the project; and (iv) have acceptable auditing arrangements. The\nfinancial management assessment was carried out in accordance with the “Financial\nManagement Manual for World Bank Investment Project Financing Operations,” which became\neffective on March 1, 2010, and was issued (retrofitted) on February 4, 2015.\n\n\n**Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n48. The project will be implemented by MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in Uganda, ADDS in\nDjibouti, and by the IGAD Secretariat. These institutions will be responsible for maintaining\nsatisfactory financial management arrangements throughout the life of the project, and they will\nconstitute the operational links with the World Bank (IDA) on matters related to the project’s\nimplementation. The accounting officers for these institutions will be the Minister of MoANR in\nEthiopia; Permanent Secretary of OPM in Uganda; Head of the Secretary of State in Charge of\nNational Solidarity that is responsible for ADDS; and the Executive Secretary of IGAD\nSecretariat. All the implementing entities in the three countries will report to their respective\nnational steering committees that will provide oversight on the project’s activities.\n\n49. The project in Ethiopia will cover five [39] regions, 16 [40] woredas, and 117 kebeles. Ethiopia\nwill have a federal project coordinating unit under MoANR and PCUs at the regional and woreda\nlevels. In Uganda the project will cover four districts—Adjumani, Arua, Kiryandongo, and\nIsingiro—and the implementation will be handled by the district administrations under a\nmemorandum of understanding between OPM and the Ministry of Local Government. In\n\n\n36 This is also known as the Djiboutian Agency for Social Development, which is under the Secretary of State in Charge of National Solidarity.\n37 The four regional bureaus are Benishangul-Gumuz Regional Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development, Afar Regional Bureau of Pastoral\nand Agricultural Development, Gambela Regional Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources, and Ethiopian Somali Bureau of Agriculture\nand Natural Resources.\n38 The four woredas are Homosha in the Bureau of Agriculture; Asayita in Afar Regional Bureau of Pastoral and Agricultural Development;\nAbole in the Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources, and Awbarre in Somali Bureau of Pastoral and Agricultural Development.\n39 The five regions are Afar, Beneshangul-Gumuz, Gambela, Tigray, and Ethiopian Somali. Implementation will be conducted by their regional\nbureaus.\n40 The woredas are Mao-Komo, Bambasi, and Homosha in Beneshangul-Gumuz Region; Asayita and Berahle in Afar Region; Tahtay Adyabo,\nTselemt, and Asgede-Tsimbla in Tigray Region; Dollo Ado, Boklomayo, Awbarre, and Kebribeyah in Ethiopian Somali Region; and Gog, Abol,\nItang, and Dimma in Gambela Region.\n\n88\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.867487907409668,
+ "start": 14,
+ "end": 17
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "refugee department",
+ "confidence": 0.5942429304122925,
+ "start": 42,
+ "end": 44
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "implementing entities",
+ "confidence": 0.8044421076774597,
+ "start": 145,
+ "end": 147
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MoANR",
+ "confidence": 0.5626226663589478,
+ "start": 368,
+ "end": 369
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 102
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Djibouti, the project will cover the three communities in Ali Adeh, Holl, and Obock, overseen by\ntwo ADDS regional offices in Ali Sabieh and Obock. The project’s services will be delivered\nmainly at the community level, whose structures will include social audit committees that will\nenhance governance arrangements.\n\n\n**Budgeting Arrangements**\n\n50. The IGAD Secretariat and the three countries will prepare annual budgets based on their\nwork plans and will then submit them to the Association at least two months before the\nbeginning of the project’s fiscal year. The budgets will follow budgeting guidelines in the\nrespective entity’s financial management manuals and PIMs. The specific details of each entity’s\nfinancial management manual are included in table 4.1 under _accounting arrangements_ . All\nbudgets should be approved before the relevant fiscal year begins. The IGAD Secretariat has\nbeen experiencing persistent delays in approving its project’s budgets due to the infrequency of\nmeetings of the IGAD Ministerial Committee. This is being mitigated by including more\npragmatic approval mechanisms in the PIM to avoid delay of the project’s implementation. In\nEthiopia, there have also been delays in consolidating budgets from the woredas at the regional\nlevel and eventually at the federal level, but this will be mitigated by including appropriate\ntimelines for the PCU staff to follow in the PIM. During the financial year, budgets will be\nmonitored on a quarterly basis using interim financial reports that will compare the budget with\nactual expenditures, and significant variances will need to be explained. The interim financial\nreports should be submitted to the Association within 45 days after the end of the calendar\nquarterly period.\n\n\n**Accounting Arrangements**\n\n51. _**Accounting policies and procedures.**_ These are adequate for the IGAD Secretariat, OPM,\nand ADDS. With respect to MoANR (the federal PCU), a financial management manual has\nbeen prepared and agreed by the Association at negotiations. This financial management manual\nis part of the PIM that has been prepared by all the other implementing countries and covers gaps\nin their manuals and regulations to ensure that the project’s financial management arrangements\nare in line with the financing agreement. The financial management manuals that will be used are\ndocumented in the table 4.1.\n\n52. _**Accounting staff.**_ These will need to be strengthened as follows **:**\n\n - _**IGAD Secretariat**_ : The Secretariat will need to recruit a qualified and experienced\n\naccountant within three months after effectiveness to account for the project. Existing\naccounting staff under the Director of Finance and Administration will have to account\nfor project funds from the time of effectiveness until the recruited accountant\ncommences duty.\n\n - _**Djibouti.**_ ADDS will need to recruit a qualified and experienced accountant within three\n\nmonths after effectiveness to account for the project funds. Existing accounting staff\nunder the ADDS finance officer will have to account for project funds from the time of\neffectiveness until the recruited accountant commences duty.\n\n - _**Uganda.**_ OPM (PIST) will need to recruit a qualified and experienced accountant within\n\nthree months after effectiveness to account for the project funds. Existing accounting\nstaff under the Head of Accounts at OPM will have to account for project funds from the\ntime of effectiveness until the recruited accountant commences duty. Three districts—\n\n\n89\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 103
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Isingiro, Arua, and Adjumani—will need to fill the vacant positions for the chief finance\nofficer and/or senior finance officers who will be in charge of accounting and reporting\nfor project funds at the districts. Each district will also designate a qualified accountant\nto support the project. Each of the districts implementing the project will have to confirm\nwith the OPM (PIST) that they have filled these key positions before disbursements can\nbe made to the districts.\n\n - _**Ethiopia.**_ MoANR (federal PCU) will need to recruit a qualified and experienced\n\nfinancial management specialist and an accountant to account for project funds. They\nwill be responsible for building the capacity of the regional and woreda accountants\nunder the project. Each of the five regional and 16 woreda PCUs will recruit a qualified\nand experienced accountant to account for project funds. The accountants at all levels\nmust be in place within three months of project effectiveness. Until such a time,\nMoANR, the Regional Bureaus of Agriculture and Woreda Office of Finance and\nEconomic Development (WoFED) must assign one accountant from their pool and\nindicate this officially in writing to the World Bank by effectiveness. Regions will not\ndisburse fund to the woredas if the proper finance officers have not been assigned or\nrecruited. The terms of reference for the accountants to be recruited should be shared\nwith the Association and cleared before finalizing recruitment.\n\n53. When necessary, accounting staff will be given training on the Association’s financial\nmanagement and disbursement guidelines.\n\n54. _**Accounting information systems.**_ These are adequate for IGAD and the three countries.\nHowever, ADDS in Djibouti has a management information system that records and pays\nbeneficiaries it needs to enhance the system’s functionality by improving on its reporting\nmechanism in order to have complete reports that include beneficiaries, their numbers, locations,\namounts paid, and so on. Details of the accounting information systems used by each\nimplementing entity are included in table 4.1.\n\n55. _**Accounting standards.**_ The IGAD Secretariat will use cash-based International Public\nSector Accounting Standards (IPSAS); ADDS and OPM will use International Public Sector\nAccounting Standards (IPSAS) to prepare the project accounts. MoANR will apply Ethiopian\nfinancial regulations that rely on a double entry bookkeeping system.\n\n56. _**Accounting basis.**_ ADDS and OPM will will use the cash basis [41] of accounting; the\nIGAD Secretariat will use an accrual basis [42] of accounting and MoANR will use a modified cash\nbasis [43] of accounting.\n\n\n**Table 4.1. Accounting Arrangements**\n\n\n\n**Financial Management**\n**Institution** **Accounting Staff**\n**Manual**\n\n\n\n**Accounting**\n**Information System**\n\n\n\n**Fiscal**\n**Year End**\n\n\n\n41 The cash basis of accounting recognizes transactions and events only when cash (including cash equivalents) are received or paid by the entity.\nFinancial statements prepared under a cash basis provide readers with information about the sources of cash raised during the period, the purposes\nfor which the cash was used, and the cash balance on the reporting date.\n42 Under an accrual basis of accounting, transactions and other events are recognized when they occur (not only when cash or its equivalent is\nreceived or paid). Therefore, transactions and events are recorded in the accounting records and recognized in the financial statements of the\nperiods to which they relate. The elements recognized under accrual accounting are assets, liabilities, net assets/equity, revenues, and expenses.\n43 The modified cash basis of accounting uses elements of both cash and accrual-based accounting. The modified cash basis uses double entry\naccounting so the resulting transactions can be used to construct a complete set of financial statements. The modified cash basis may be\nacceptable as long as there is no need for the financial statements to be compliant with International Public Sector Accounting Standards\n(IPSAS).\n\n90\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 104
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|IGAD
Secretariat|The Financial Management
Unit is headed by the director
of finance and
administration, but the
Secretariat needs to recruit an
accountant for this project to
have adequate staffing.|IGAD Financial Rules
and Regulations and
IGAD Internal Control
Policy|SUN Accounting
System|December
31|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ethiopia:**
Ministry of
Agriculture and
Natural
Resources
(MoANR)|The MoANR’s FPCU will
need to recruit a financial
management specialist and an
accountant. Each of the five
regional and 16 woreda
PCUs will have to recruit an
accountant, ensuring
adequate accounting staffing
arrangements for the project.|_Federal Government of_
_Ethiopia Financial_
_Manual_. However, the
project has prepared the
PIM with financial
management aspects. A
financial management
manual that is agreeable
to the Association will
be prepared before
effectiveness.|Peachtree accounting
software at the FPCU
and RPCU levels.
Woreda PCUs will use
manual accounting
systems. Project could
move to the
government’s
Integrated Budget
Expenditure (IBEX)
accounting system
when it becomes
operational for
projects.|July 7|\n|**Uganda**: Office
of the Prime
Minister (OPM)|The OPM PIST will recruit a
project accountant. The three
districts (Arua, Adjumani,
and Isingiro) will recruit
and/or designate qualified
officers for vacant positions
of chief finance officers
and/or senior finance officers
before receiving project
funding. Each district will
designate an accountant to
handle the project. District
accountants will coordinate
the follow up of
accountabilities from the
communities with the
subcounty accountants.|The Public Financial
Management Act 2015
and related Regulations;
Treasury Accounting
Instructions, 2003; Local
Government Act; Local
Government (Financial
and Accounting)
Regulations, 2007; and
Local Government
Financial Management
Manual.|SUN Accounting
System but likely to
migrate to the
Integrated Financial
Management
Information System
(IFMIS)|June 30|\n|**Djibouti**:
_Agence_
_Djiboutienne de_
_Développement_
_Social_
(Djiboutian
Social
Development
Agency, ADDS)|ADDS accounting staff under
the Department of
Accounting includes a
finance officer who reports to
the “_Agent Comptable,_” but
the PIU will need to recruit
an accountant who will be
responsible for all financial
management aspects of the
project.|Project Financial
Operation Manual,
which needs to be
updated to cover this
project.|TOMPRO Accounting
system and a
management
information system
that needs to improve
its functionality with
respect to its reporting
mechanism.|December
31|\n\n\n\n**Internal Control and Internal Audit Arrangements**\n\n57. _**Internal controls.**_ The internal control procedures will be documented in the financial\nmanagement manuals that are shown in the table 4.1 for each of the implementing entities and\ntheir PIMs that will take into consideration gaps in their existing financial management manuals\n\n\n91\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.6213502883911133,
+ "start": 235,
+ "end": 236
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "accounting system",
+ "confidence": 0.7211255431175232,
+ "start": 338,
+ "end": 340
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.714937150478363,
+ "start": 363,
+ "end": 364
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Information System",
+ "confidence": 0.8790285587310791,
+ "start": 604,
+ "end": 606
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "IFMIS",
+ "confidence": 0.6983600854873657,
+ "start": 610,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.9177571535110474,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TOMPRO Accounting",
+ "confidence": 0.5058934092521667,
+ "start": 761,
+ "end": 763
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5282731652259827,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial\nmanagement manuals",
+ "confidence": 0.9069872498512268,
+ "start": 840,
+ "end": 843
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "implementing entities",
+ "confidence": 0.6027941703796387,
+ "start": 856,
+ "end": 858
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 105
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "to ensure that the project’s financial management arrangements are in line with the financing\nagreement. This will ensure that the project has an effective internal control system. A review of\nthe internal control systems was conducted and the following was noted:\n\n - **Djibouti.** ADDS will need to prepare a fixed asset register of all its assets. It will be\n\nessential that this is also done for this project.\n\n - **IGAD.** The financial and accounting procedures at IGAD will be documented in detail in\n\nthe PIM.\n\n - **Ethiopia.** The assessment noted delays in bank reconciliations and large amounts of cash\n\nbeing held at the woreda level due to difficulties involved in reaching their banks.\nRegular cash counts at the woreda level were not being done to reconcile the cash\nposition. At the regional offices (Bureaus of Agriculture), the presence of cash was\nobserved but cash payments are not made from the offices and there was no maintenance\nof an updated fixed asset register. There was also a lack of segregation of duties as the\nhead of finance is also responsible for procurement and property administration.\n\n - **Uganda.** A review of the audited accounts of OPM for June 30, 2015, was conducted,\n\nand the opinion was qualified. Major issues that could affect this project that need to be\nmitigated include noncompliance with procurement procedures; advances for subprojects\nto communities under the Northern Uganda Social Action Fund Project that are\nunaccounted for; mischarge of expenditure on item codes that do not reflect the nature of\nexpenditures; and delays in executing contracts.\n\n\n58. _**Internal audit.**_ The IGAD Secretariat has an adequate internal audit unit with five staff\nmembers, a risk-based audit manual, and audit software. In Uganda, the internal audit unit at\nOPM is adequate and can be supplemented by additional auditors from the Ministry of Finance,\nPlanning, and Economic Development. This unit will produce semiannual internal audit reports\non the project within 30 days after the end of the period. At the district level, Adjumnai will be\nrequired to fill the vacant position of the principal internal auditor, and Isingiro and Arua will fill\nthe vacant positons of senior internal auditors before disbursements to the districts are made. The\nFPCU at MoANR in Ethiopia will need to recruit an internal auditor within three months after\neffectiveness in order to have adequate internal audit arrangements. This is because the internal\naudit arrangements in Ethiopia at all levels (federal, regional, and woreda) are weak in terms of\ntheir capacity. For ADDS, the internal audit department will be fortified with additional adequate\nand experienced staff to conduct the internal audit of the World Bank project. The recruited\ninternal auditor will conduct regular audits on the project to ensure that funds are being utilized\nfor the intended purposes.\n\n\n59. _**Audit committees.**_ In Uganda, the audit committee at the OPM and the district public\naccounts committees are not effectively and regularly following up on audit issues to ensure they\nare addressed. They will need training and facilitation to enhance their performance. At the\nIGAD Secretariat, there seems to be an effective Internal Audit Committee made up of the heads\nof departments that meets monthly. The composition of the committee, however, poses a risk of\nconflict of interest because the heads of the departments are involved in following up on issues\nthat could relate to them. In order to mitigate this issue, the IGAD Ministerial Committee will\nneed to closely monitor the performance of this committee. The MoANR in Ethiopia and ADDS\nin Djibouti do not have audit committees, but they are expected to form them because they can\nensure that management is addressing audit issues. However, in Ethiopia, the Government has\n\n92\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "fixed asset register",
+ "confidence": 0.8968061208724976,
+ "start": 59,
+ "end": 62
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.927465558052063,
+ "start": 49,
+ "end": 50
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.594058632850647,
+ "start": 101,
+ "end": 102
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "financial and accounting procedures",
+ "confidence": 0.5548437833786011,
+ "start": 88,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "fixed asset register",
+ "confidence": 0.9325397610664368,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.8158146739006042,
+ "start": 217,
+ "end": 218
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.859977662563324,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 234
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audited accounts of OPM",
+ "confidence": 0.6306285262107849,
+ "start": 225,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.9092289209365845,
+ "start": 217,
+ "end": 218
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.558691143989563,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 234
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "June 30, 2015",
+ "confidence": 0.6276484131813049,
+ "start": 230,
+ "end": 234
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9372295141220093,
+ "start": 370,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.8764259815216064,
+ "start": 336,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal audit arrangements",
+ "confidence": 0.6878754496574402,
+ "start": 450,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 106
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "established standing budget and audit committees for woredas, and their members are receiving\ntraining on how to follow up on audit findings. The effectiveness of the audit committees at the\nworeda level will be reviewed during the implementation of the project.\n\n\n**Governance and Anti-corruption arrangements**\n\n60. MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in Uganda, and ADDS in Djibouti will follow existing\nanticorruption laws when dealing with fraud and corruption, while the IGAD Secretariat will\nfollow their institutional rules, regulations, guidelines, policies, and procedures. Financial\nmanagement arrangements will ensure that there are internal control systems in place and that\naudits are conducted to prevent and detect fraud and corruption. Transparency and accountability\nis highly encouraged by putting the project’s budget and audited financial statements on the\nimplementing entity’s websites. Complaint-handling mechanisms are in place in MoANR in\nEthiopia but need to be established in OPM in Uganda and ADDS in Djibouti such that\nbeneficiaries who are not receiving services as planned can have a mechanism to raise their\ncomplaints and that they are followed up on and addressed. This complaints-handling\nmechanism should include setting up structures at the community level that include social audit\ncommittees. In addition, the project must comply with the World Bank’s anticorruption\nguidelines.\n\n\n**Funds Flow Arrangements**\n\n61. **Designated and project accounts.** MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in Uganda, ADDS in\nDjibouti, and the IGAD Secretariat will have to open designated accounts denominated in U.S.\ndollars and a project account denominated in local currency. These will be maintained at either\nthe central bank or at a commercial bank acceptable to the Association. The specific banking\ndetails for each of the implementing entities are shown in table 4.2. The signatories to these\naccounts should be in line with the financial management manuals and/or PIM of the\nimplementing entities, and they should be submitted to the Association between the signing of\nthe project and its effectiveness. Payments for eligible expenditures can be made from either the\ndesignated or project accounts.\n\n\n**Table 4.2. Designated and Project Bank Accounts**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Institution|Designated Account|Project Account|\n|---|---|---|\n|**IGAD Secretariat**|Commercial Bank (Djibouti Exim
Bank)|Commercial Bank (Djibouti Exim
Bank)|\n|**Ethiopia:**The Ministry of
Agriculture and Natural
Resources (MoANR)—federal
PCU|Central Bank (National Bank of
Ethiopia)|Pooled Account at the Central Bank
(National Bank of Ethiopia)|\n|**Uganda**: Office of the Prime
Minister—PIST|Central Bank (Bank of Uganda)|Central Bank (Bank of Uganda)|\n|**Djibouti**: ADDS|Commercial Bank (Bank of Africa
Red Sea Djibouti)|Commercial Bank (Bank of Africa Red
Sea Djibouti)|\n\n\n62. **Other project accounts.** In Ethiopia, each of the regional and woreda PCUs will open\nseparate project bank accounts denominated in local currency. In Uganda, the four districts will\nalso open separate project bank accounts referred to as the _district subproject account,_\ndenominated in local currency (see fig 4.6). The signatories to these accounts should be in line\n\n\n93\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 107
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "with the entity’s financial management manual and/or PIMs; they should be submitted to\nMoANR in Ethiopia and OPM in Uganda.\n\n\n**Figure 4.6. Funds Flow**\n\n\n**Disbursements**\n\n\n63. OPM in Uganda will access funding from the Association using the report-based\ndisbursement method; the IGAD Secretariat, ADDS and MoANR in Ethiopia will access funding\nfrom the Association using the transaction-based disbursement method. In both cases,\nwithdrawal applications should be prepared within one month after project effectiveness. IGAD\nSecretariat, ADDS, and MoANR in Ethiopia can move to report-based disbursement upon\nsatisfactory compliance with the financial management covenants in the financing agreement.\nOther methods of disbursement that can be used by the above implementing entities include\ndirect payments, reimbursements, and special commitments. If ineligible expenditures are found\nto have been made from the designated and/or project accounts, the recipient will be obligated to\nrefund these amounts. If the designated account remains inactive for more than six months, the\nAssociation may reduce the amount advanced. The Association will have the right, as reflected\nin the terms of the Financing Agreements, to suspend disbursement of the funds if significant\n\n\n94\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 108
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "conditions, including reporting requirements, are not complied with. Additional details regarding\ndisbursement are provided in the Disbursement Letters.\n\n\n**Financial Reporting Arrangements**\n\n64. All implementing entities (MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in Uganda, ADDS in Djibouti, and\nthe IGAD Secretariat) will prepare quarterly unaudited interim financial reports in a format and\nwith content satisfactory to the Association, which will be submitted to the Association within 45\ndays after the end of the relevant quarter. The format and content of the interim financial report\nwas agreed by the Association and the implementing entities at negotiations. The content of the\ninterim financial report for all implementing entities will include the following information to\naccount for project funds:\n\n - Statement of sources and uses of funds; and\n\n - Statement of uses of funds by project activity/component.\n\n65. For the OPM in Uganda, this involves using report-based disbursement. It will need to\nsubmit the following documentation to access disbursements from the Association. They include:\n\n - Designated account activity statement;\n\n - Bank statements for both the designated and project account and related bankreconciliation statements;\n\n - Summary statement of designated account expenditures for contracts subject to prior\nreview; and\n\n - Summary statement of designated account expenditures not subject to prior review.\n\n66. All national implementing entities will also prepare the project’s annual accounts and\nfinancial statements within three months after the end of the accounting year in accordance with\naccounting standards acceptable to the Association. The financial statements must be submitted\nto the Association within six months after the end of the fiscal year.\n\n\n**External Audit Arrangements**\n\n67. The external audit of the project’s funds that are implemented by MoANR in Ethiopia\nand OPM in Uganda will be conducted by the supreme audit institutions that can contract private\naudit firms acceptable to the Association to conduct the audit on their behalf. ADDS in Djibouti\nand the IGAD Secretariat will use private audit firms that are acceptable to the Association. The\ncost of hiring a private audit firm will be met by the project. All audits should be carried out in\naccordance with International Standards on Auditing or International Standards for Supreme\nAudit Institutions issued by the International Organization for Supreme Audit Institutions. All\nexternal audit terms of reference for each implementing entity were agreed by the Association at\nnegotiations. The external auditors should be appointed within six months after effectiveness.\nAudit reports and management letters should be submitted to the World Bank within six months\nafter the end of the fiscal year of the implementing entity. Audit reports will be publically\ndisclosed by the World Bank Group in accordance with the Association’s disclosure policy. A\nreview of audit reports of each of the entities was conducted, and there were no major\naccountability issues except for the accountability of advances to the communities that will need\nto be closely monitored under this project. Internal control issues, which have been documented\nabove, will need to be addressed.\n\n\n**Table 4.3. Financial Management Action Plan**\n\n\n95\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 109
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Implementing
Entity|Action|Responsibility|Due Date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|All
implementing
entities|Agree on interim financial report
formats and external audit terms of
reference|The Ministry of Agriculture and
Natural Resources (MoANR) in
Ethiopia, the Office of the Prime
Minister (OPM) in Uganda,
ADDS in Djibouti and IGAD
Secretariat|At Negotiations|\n|Ethiopia|A PIM with financial management
aspects will be prepared. A detailed
project financial management manual
that is acceptable to the Association will
be prepared before effectiveness as part
of the PIM.|MoANR in Ethiopia|One month after
effectiveness|\n|All
implementing
entities|PIMs acceptable to the Association have
been prepared by all implementing
entities. The manuals address gaps in the
existing financial management manuals
to reflect project specific requirements.|MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in
Uganda, ADDS in Djibouti, and
the IGAD Secretariat|At negotiations|\n|All
implementing
entities|Recruit qualified and experienced
accounting staff to prepare project
accounts:
**IGAD Secretariat**: One accountant
**ADDS**: One Accountant
**OPM (PIST)**: One accountant
**MoANR**: Federal PCU to recruit one
financial management specialist and one
accountant; five regional PCU
accountants, and 16 woreda PCU
accountants.|MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in
Uganda, ADDS in Djibouti, and
the IGAD Secretariat|Within three
months after
effectiveness|\n|Uganda|The districts of Adjumani, Arua, and
Isingiro to confirm with OPM (PIST)
that they have filled and/or designated
qualified officers for the vacant positions
of chief finance officer and/or senior
finance officer and assigned a qualified
and experienced accountant to account
for project funds.|OPM (PIST) and the districts of
Adjumani, Arua, Kiryandongo,
and Isingiro in Uganda|Disbursement
condition to the
districts|\n|Ethiopia|MoANR, the Regional Bureaus of
Agriculture and WoFEDs to assign one
accountant from their pool of staff to
account for project funds until the
project accountants are recruited.
Assigned staff should be officially
communicated to the Association before
fund is disbursed to regions and
woredas.|MoANR, Bureau of Agriculture,
and WoFED in Ethiopia|Before fund is
disbursed to
regions and
woredas|\n|Djibouti|Update the project financial operation
manual to cover this project.|ADDS in Djibouti|Within three
months after
effectiveness|\n|Djibouti|Update the management information
system to improve on its reporting
mechanism.|ADDS in Djibouti|Within three
months after
effectiveness|\n|Ethiopia and|ADDS to recruit a qualified and
experienced internal auditor to|MoANR in Ethiopia and ADDS|Within three
months after|\n\n\n\n96\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "interim financial report",
+ "confidence": 0.8835005760192871,
+ "start": 44,
+ "end": 47
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "formats and external audit terms",
+ "confidence": 0.5301185846328735,
+ "start": 50,
+ "end": 55
+ },
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5736476182937622,
+ "start": 46,
+ "end": 47
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.5940794348716736,
+ "start": 78,
+ "end": 79
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.7686426639556885,
+ "start": 115,
+ "end": 116
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.5143229961395264,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management information",
+ "confidence": 0.5277577042579651,
+ "start": 661,
+ "end": 663
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5573961734771729,
+ "start": 623,
+ "end": 624
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 110
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Implementing
Entity|Action|Responsibility|Due Date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Djibouti
|strengthen internal control systems of
the project.
MoANR Federal PCU to ensure that the
project is included in the annual audit
work plan of the internal audit unit.|in Djibouti|effectiveness and
annually for
MoANR|\n|Uganda|Audit committees at OPM and the
district public accounts committee to be
trained to effectively conduct their roles
of ensuring that audit issues are
addressed by management.|OPM and districts in Uganda|Within six
months after
effectiveness|\n|All
implementing
entities|Appoint an external auditor for the
project.|MoANR in Ethiopia, OPM in
Uganda, ADDS in Djibouti, and
the IGAD Secretariat|Six months after
effectiveness|\n\n\n\n**Financial Covenants**\n\n68. Financial covenants are standard as stated in Schedule 2, Section II(B) of the financing\nagreement on financial management, financial reports, and audits and Section 4.09 of the\nGeneral Conditions.\n\n\n**Implementation Support Plan**\n\n69. Financial management implementation support missions will be carried out twice a year\nfor MoANR (federal PCU) in Ethiopia and OPM (PIST) in Uganda based on the substantial\nfinancial management residual risk rating. For ADDS in Djibouti and the IGAD Secretariat, the\nimplementation support will be carried out once a year based on the moderate financial\nmanagement residual risk rating. Implementation support will also include desk reviews, such as\nthe review of the interim financial reports and audit reports. In-depth reviews and forensic\nreviews may be done as deemed necessary. The financial management implementation support\nwill be an integrated part of the project’s implementation reviews.\n\n\n**Conclusion**\n\n70. The conclusion of the assessment is that the financial management arrangements in place\nmeet the World Bank’s (IDA’s) minimum requirements under OP/BP10.00, and therefore are\nadequate to provide, with reasonable assurance, accurate and timely information on the status of\nthe project required by World Bank (IDA). The overall financial management residual risk rating\nis substantial for MoANR in Ethiopia and Uganda and moderate for IGAD Secretariat and\nADDS in Djibouti.\n\n\n_**Procurement management**_\n71. Procurement Environment: National Procurement Procedures are normally acceptable for\nNational Competitive Bidding (NCB), subject to some exceptions as listed for each country in\nparagraphs 83 and 85.\n\n\n**Applicable Procurement Guidelines**\n\n97\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "interim financial reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9187713265419006,
+ "start": 346,
+ "end": 349
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9236937761306763,
+ "start": 350,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6101799011230469,
+ "start": 405,
+ "end": 407
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Applicable Procurement Guidelines",
+ "confidence": 0.58686763048172,
+ "start": 521,
+ "end": 524
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 111
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "72. **General** . Procurement under the proposed project would be carried out in accordance\nwith the World Bank’s _Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works and Non-Consulting Services_\n_under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grant by World Bank Recipients_, dated January 2011\n(updated July 2014); _Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans_\n_and IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Recipients_, dated January 2011 (updated July 2014);\n_Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD_\n_Loans and IDA Credits and Grants_ (the anticorruption guidelines), dated October 15, 2006\n(revised January 2011); and the provisions stipulated in the legal agreement.\n\n\n73. The general descriptions of items under different expenditure categories are described\nbelow. For each contract to be financed by the Credit, the different procurement methods or\nconsultant selection methods and the need for prequalification, estimated costs, prior review\nrequirements, and timeframes are agreed to between the recipient and the Association in the\nprocurement plan. The procurement plan will be updated at least annually or as required to\nreflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. The\nrecipients as well as the contractors, suppliers, and consultants will observe the highest standards\nof ethics during procurement and execution of contracts financed under this project.\n\n\n74. **Bidding documents applicable under the project** . The Association’s Standard Bidding\nDocuments will be used for procurement of works and goods under International Competitive\nBidding; and the Standard Request for Proposals will be used for consultants’ contracts. The\nimplementing agencies will use Standard Bid Evaluation Form for the procurement of goods and\nworks for International Competitive Bidding contracts and will use the Sample Form of\nEvaluation Report for Selection of Consultants. National Standard Bidding Documents\nacceptable to the Association may be used for procurement of goods, works, and nonconsulting\nservices under NCB procedures subject to the exceptions indicated below for each country.\nAlternatively, the Association’s Standard Bidding Documents would be used with appropriate\nmodifications. Furthermore, in accordance with para.1.16 (e) of the Procurement Guidelines,\neach bidding document and contract financed out of the proceeds of the financing shall provide\nthat: (i) the bidders, suppliers, and contractors and their subcontractors, agents, personnel,\nconsultants, service providers, or suppliers shall permit the Association, at its request, to inspect\ntheir accounts, records, and other documents relating to submission of bids and contract\nperformance and to have said accounts and records audited by auditors appointed by the\nAssociation; and (ii) deliberate and material violation by the bidder, supplier, contractor, or\nsubcontractor of such provision may amount to an obstructive practice as defined in paragraphs\n1.16(a)(v) of the Procurement Guidelines.\n\n\n**Applicable Procurement Methods**\n\n75. **Scope of procurement.** The implementation of the project entails procurement of various\ntypes of goods, works, and services that vary from country to country, but it generally consists\nof: (i) goods and equipment, including vehicles and motorcycles, information technology\nequipment, office furniture and equipment, and audiovisual equipment; (i) works at the\ncommunity level that include construction of roads, schools, clinics, health centers, and\nmarketing centers; (iii) consulting services (such as technical assistance, project staff, studies,\ndesign and supervision firms, financial and procurement audits, and M&E; and (iv) training and\nworkshops.\n\n\n98\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 112
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "76. **Procurement of works and goods.** Contract packages for works estimated to cost US$7\nmillion equivalent and above per contract for Ethiopia, US$10 million equivalent and above per\ncontract for Uganda, and US$2 million equivalent and above per contract for Djibouti and\nIGAD; and contract packages for goods estimated to cost US$1 million equivalent and above per\ncontract for Ethiopia and Uganda and US$0.3 million equivalent and above per contract for\nDjibouti and IGAD will be procured using International Competitive Bidding procedures. Works\ncontracts estimated to cost less than US$7 million equivalent per contract for Ethiopia, less than\nUS$10 million equivalent per contract for Uganda, and less than US$2 million equivalent per\ncontract for Djibouti and IGAD; and goods contracts estimated to cost less than US$1 million\nequivalent per contract for Ethiopia and Uganda and less than US$300,000 for Djibouti and\nIGAD would be procured through NCB procedures. Small-works contracts estimated to cost less\nthan US$200,000 equivalent per contract for Ethiopia, Uganda, Djibouti, and IGAD; and goods\ncontracts estimated to cost less than US$100,000 equivalent per contract for Ethiopia and\nUganda and less than US$50,000 for Djibouti and IGAD may be procured through Shopping\nprocedures by comparing prices for quotations received from at least three reliable contractors or\nsuppliers. In such cases, request for estimates shall be made in writing and shall indicate the\ndescription, scope of the works, the time required for completion of the works, and the payment\nterms. All estimates received will be opened at the same time. As a general rule, a qualified\nsupplier who offers goods or materials that meet the specifications at the lowest price will be\nrecommended for award of the contract. Limited International Bidding for goods may\nexceptionally be used when there are only a limited number of known suppliers worldwide.\n\n\n77. _**Direct contracting**_ for works or goods may be an appropriate method in exceptional or\nemergency situation, provided the Association is satisfied in such cases that no advantage could\nbe obtained from competition and that prices are reasonable. In Ethiopia, because of regulated\nmarkets in the area of agricultural inputs, telecom, electricity, radio, and television broadcasting\nservices, such inputs and services can only be supplied by farmers’ cooperatives, Ethio-telecom,\nEthiopian Electric Utility (EEU), and Ethiopian Broadcasting Corporation (EBC), respectively.\nBecause the provisions for these goods and services are insignificant and because there are no\nprivate-sector alternatives, such goods and services will be procured from farmers’ cooperatives,\nEthio-telecom, EEU, and EBC through direct contracting.\n\n\n78. **Procurement of nonconsulting services.** Non consulting services, which are services\nthat are not of intellectual or advisory nature and the services for which the physical aspects of\nthe activity predominate will include drilling, aerial photography, satellite imagery, and\nmapping. The procurement of nonconsulting services will follow the existing Association’s\nStandard Bidding Documents for International Competitive Bidding, or national Standard\nBidding Documents for NCB, with appropriate modifications.\n\n\n79. **Use of framework agreements.** Common supplies, for example, stationery and\nconsumables, will be aggregated and procured through framework contracts to enable\nimplementing agencies place orders for urgently needed supplies at short notice at a competitive\nprice. Framework agreements will not restrict foreign competition and should be limited to a\nmaximum duration of three years. The recipient shall submit to the Association for its “no\nobjection” the circumstances and justification for the use of a framework agreement, the\nparticular approach and model adopted, the procedures for selection and award, and the terms\nand conditions of the contracts. Framework agreement procedures applicable to the project are\n\n99\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 113
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "those of the recipients that have been deemed acceptable by the Association, and shall be\ndescribed in the financing agreement.\n\n\n80. **Selection of consultants.** Contracts with firms estimated to cost US$200,000 (for\nEthiopia and Uganda) and US$50,000 (for Djibouti and IGAD) equivalent and above per\ncontract will be selected using the Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) Method. Quality\nBased Selection (QBS) and/or Fixed Budget Selection (FBS) may be used for assignments that\nmeet the requirements of paragraph 3.2 and 3.5 of the Consultants Guidelines, respectively.\nHowever, consultants used for assignments of a standard and routine nature such as audits and\nother repetitive services would be selected through Least-Cost Selection (LCS) method in\naccordance with paragraph 3.6 of the Consultants Guidelines. Contracts for consulting services,\nusing firms, estimated to cost less than US$300,000 (for Ethiopia and Uganda) equivalent per\ncontract and for which the cost of a full-fledged selection process would not be justified may be\nselected on the basis of Selection Based on the Consultants’ Qualifications (CQS) method in\naccordance with paragraphs 3.7 of the Consultants Guidelines. Short List of consultants for\nservices estimated to cost less than US$200,000 (for Ethiopia and Uganda) and US$50,000 (for\nDjibouti and IGAD) equivalent per contract may be comprised entirely of national consultants in\naccordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines. For consulting\nassignments of engineering and contract supervision, short list of consultants for services\nestimated to cost less than US$300,000 (for Ethiopia and Uganda) and US$50,000 (for Djibouti\nand IGAD) equivalent per contract may be comprised entirely of national consultants in\naccordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines.\n\n\n81. _**Single-Source Selection (SSS)**_ of consulting firms or individuals would be applied only\nin exceptional cases if it presents a clear advantage over competition when selection through a\ncompetitive process is not practicable or appropriate and would be made on the basis of strong\njustifications and upon Bank’s concurrence to the grounds supporting such justification.\n\n\n82. _**Individual Consultants (IC)**_ will be selected on the basis of their qualifications by\ncomparison of CVs of at least three candidates from those expressing interest in the assignment\nor those approached directly by the Implementing Agency in accordance with the provision of\nSection V of the Consultants Guidelines.\n\n\n83. _**Training and Workshops**_ : The project will fund training activities including capacity\nsupport of communities, local government officials, project staff, etc. Training plans of each\ncountry will be approved by the Association. The training plans would include details on: (i) type\nof training to be provided; (ii) number of beneficiaries to be trained, duration of training, and\nestimated cost; (iii) institutions selected based on their expertise; and (iv) expected learning\noutcomes. Trainings and workshops shall be prior reviewed as part of the annual work-plans of\nthe participating countries.\n\n\n84. _**Operating Costs**_ **:** Incremental operating costs include expenditures for maintaining\nequipment and vehicles; fuel; office supplies; utilities; consumables; workshop venues and\nmaterials; and per diems, travel costs, and accommodation for staff when travelling on duty\nduring implementation of this project, but excluding salaries of civil/public servants. These will\nbe procured using the Recipient's administrative procedures, acceptable to the Association.\nOperating expenditures are neither subject to the Procurement and Consultant Guidelines nor\n\n\n100\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 114
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "prior or post reviews. Operating expenditures are normally verified by TTLs and financial\nmanagement specialists.\n\n\n85. _**Bank’s Review Thresholds:**_ The Recipient shall seek World Bank prior review in\naccordance with Annex 1 of both Procurement and Consultant Guidelines for contracts above the\nthresholds as agreed in the Procurement Plan. For purposes of the initial Procurement Plan, the\nRecipient shall seek Bank prior review for: (i) works contracts estimated to cost US$5 million\n(for Ethiopia and Uganda) and US$0.3 million (for Djibouti and IGAD) equivalent per contract\nand above; (ii) goods contracts estimated to cost US$500,000 (for Ethiopia and Uganda), and\nUS$0.1 million (for Djibouti and IGAD) equivalent per contract and above; (iii) all consultancy\ncontracts for services to be provided by consulting firms of US$200,000 (for Ethiopia and\nUganda), and 0.1 million (for Djibouti and IGAD), equivalent per contract and above; (iv) for\nindividual consultants contracts estimated to cost US$100,000 (for Ethiopia and Uganda), and\nUS$0.5 million (for Djibouti and IGAD) equivalent per contract and above; (iv) all direct\ncontracting and single source selection contracts regardless of their value; and (v) annual training\nplan. In addition, a specified number of contracts to be identified in the procurement plan for the\nprocurement of goods and works below the International Competitive Bidding threshold will also\nbe subject to prior review. These prior review thresholds may be re-visited annually and any\nrevisions based on the assessment of the implementing agencies capacity will be agreed with the\nRecipient and included in an updated Procurement Plan.\n\n\n86. _**Record Keeping**_ : Each implementing agency in the respective country will be responsible\nfor record keeping and filing of procurement records for ease of retrieval of procurement\ninformation. In this respect, each contract shall have its own file and should contain all\ndocuments on the procurement process in accordance with the requirements and as described in\nthe national procurement Law.\n\n\n87. _**Monitoring**_ **:** M&E of procurement performance will be carried out through Bank\nsupervision and post procurement review missions.\n\n\n**Use of National Procurement Procedures for Goods and Works**\n\n88. National Procurement Procedures are normally acceptable for NCB, subject to some\nexceptions as listed below for each country:\n\n\n89. Djibouti: The NCB exceptions for Djibouti are provided as follows:\n\n\n(1) In the Standard Bidding Documents, as enacted by the by Law n°2010-349/PRE, dated\n\nMay 8, 2010, the “Fraud and Corruption” clause shall be revised to read as follows for all\ncontracts financed by the present Financing Agreement: “It is the Association’s policy to\nrequire that Recipients (including beneficiaries of Association administered Financing\nAgreements), bidders, suppliers, contractors and their agents (whether declared or not),\nsubcontractors, sub consultants, service providers or suppliers, and any personnel thereof,\nobserve the highest standard of ethics during the procurement and execution of\nAssociation-financed contracts. In pursuance of this policy, the Association:\n\n(a) defines, for the purposes of this provision, the terms set forth below as follows:\n\n\n101\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 115
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "(i) “corrupt practice” is the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting, directly or\n\nindirectly, of anything of value to influence improperly the actions of another\nparty\n\n(ii) “fraudulent practice” is any act or omission, including a misrepresentation,\n\nthat knowingly or recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to obtain\na financial or other benefit or to avoid an obligation;\n\n(iii) “collusive practice” is an arrangement between two or more parties designed\n\nto achieve an improper purpose, including to influence improperly the actions\nof another party;\n\n(iv) “coercive practice” is impairing or harming, or threatening to impair or harm,\n\ndirectly or indirectly, any party or the property of the party to influence\nimproperly the actions of a party;\n\n(v) “obstructive practice” is:\n\n(aa) deliberately destroying, falsifying, altering, or concealing of evidence\nmaterial to the investigation or making false statements to investigators in\norder to materially impede an Association investigation into allegations of\na corrupt, fraudulent, coercive or collusive practice; and/or threatening,\nharassing or intimidating any party to prevent it from disclosing its\nknowledge of matters relevant to the investigation or from pursuing the\ninvestigation, or\n\n\n(bb) acts intended to materially impede the exercise of the Association’s\ninspection and audit rights provided for under paragraph I below.\n\n\n(b) will reject a proposal for award if it determines that the bidder recommended for\naward, or any of its personnel, or its agents, or its sub consultants, subcontractors, service\nproviders, suppliers and/or their employees, has, directly or indirectly, engaged in\ncorrupt, fraudulent, collusive, coercive, or obstructive practices in competing for the\ncontract in question;\n\n\n(c) will declare mis-procurement and cancel the portion of the loan/agreement allocated\nto a contract if it determines at any time that representatives of the Recipient or of a\nrecipient of any part of the proceeds of the loan/agreement engaged in corrupt,\nfraudulent, collusive, coercive, or obstructive practices during the procurement or the\nimplementation of the contract in question, without the Recipient having taken timely and\nappropriate action satisfactory to the Association to address such practices when they\noccur, including by failing to inform the Association in a timely manner at the time they\nknew of the practices;\n\n\n(d) will sanction a firm or individual, at any time, in accordance with the prevailing\nBank’s sanctions procedures, including by publicly declaring such firm or individual\nineligible, either indefinitely or for a stated period of time: (i) to be awarded an\nAssociation-financed contract; and (ii) to be a nominated subcontractor, consultant,\nsupplier, or service provider of an otherwise eligible firm being awarded an Associationfinanced contract;\n\n102\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 116
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "(e) hereby requires that a clause be included in bidding documents and in contracts\nfinanced by an Association loan/agreement, requiring bidders, suppliers and contractors,\nand their subcontractors, agents, personnel, consultants, service providers, or suppliers, to\npermit the Association to inspect all accounts, records, and other documents relating to\nthe submission of bids and contract performance, and to have them audited by auditors\nappointed by the Association; and\n\n\n(f) will require that, when a Recipient procures goods, works or nonconsulting services\ndirectly from a United Nations (UN) agency under an agreement signed between the\nRecipient and the UN agency, the above provisions regarding sanctions on fraud or\ncorruption shall apply in their entirety to all suppliers, contractors, service providers,\nconsultants, subcontractors or sub consultants, and their employees that signed contracts\nwith the UN agency.\n\n\n(g) As an exception to the foregoing, (d) and paragraph (i) will not apply to the UN\nagency and its employees, and paragraph (i) will not apply to the contracts between the\nUN agency and its suppliers and service providers. In such cases, the UN agencies will\napply their own rules and regulations for investigating allegations of fraud or corruption\nsubject to such terms and conditions as the Association and the UN agency may agree,\nincluding an obligation to periodically inform the Association of the decisions and\nactions taken. The Association retains the right to require the Recipient to invoke\nremedies such as suspension or termination. UN agencies shall consult the Association’s\nlist of firms and individuals suspended or debarred. In the event a UN agency signs a\ncontract or purchase order with a firm or an individual suspended or debarred by the\nAssociation, the Association will not finance the related expenditures and will apply\nother remedies as appropriate.”\n\n\n(2) Bidders shall sign, as part of their bids, the ethical charter Form enacted as Annex 3 by\n\nthe Decree # 2010-0085PRE dated May 8, 2010;\n\n\n(3) No preference shall be granted for domestic bids;\n\n(4) The NCB procedures shall include, further to public opening of bids, publication of\nresults of evaluation and of the award of contract as per paragraph 7 of Appendix 1 of the\nProcurement Guidelines; and\n\n\n(5) Recipient shall have an effective and independent protest mechanism in place allowing\nbidders to protest and have their protests handled in a timely manner.\n\n90. **Ethiopia** : National Competitive Bidding (NCB) shall follow the Open and Competitive\nBidding procedure set forth in the Ethiopian Federal Government and Procurement and Property\nAdministration Proclamation No. 649/2009 and Federal Public Procurement Directive issued by\nthe Ministry of Finance and Economic Cooperation dated June 10, 2010, provided, that such\nprocedure shall be subject to the provisions of Section I and Paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 of the\n“Guidelines for Procurement of Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD Loans\nand IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Recipients” (January 2011) (the “Procurement\nGuidelines”) and the following additional provisions:\n\n\n103\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 117
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "i. The Recipient’s standard bidding documents for procurement of goods and works\n\nacceptable to the Association shall be used. At the request of the Recipient, the introduction\nof requirements for bidders to sign an Anti-Bribery pledge and/or statement of undertaking\nto observe Ethiopian Law against Fraud and Corruption and other forms that ought to be\ncompleted and signed by him/her may be included in bidding documents if the\narrangements governing such undertakings are acceptable to the Bank.\n\nii. If pre-qualification is used, the Association’s standard prequalification document shall be\n\nused.\n\niii. No margin of preference shall be granted in bid evaluation on the basis of bidder’s\n\nnationality, origin of goods or services, and/or preferential programs such as but not limited\nto small and medium enterprises.\n\niv. Mandatory registration in a Supplier List shall not be used to assess bidders’ qualifications.\n\nA foreign bidder shall not be required to register as a condition for submitting its bid and if\nrecommended for contract award shall be given a reasonable opportunity to register with\nthe reasonable cooperation of the Recipient, prior to contract signing. Invitations to bids\nshall be advertised in at least one newspaper of national circulation or the official gazette,\nor on a widely used website or electronic portal with free national and international access.\n\nv. Bidders shall be given a minimum of thirty (30) days to submit bids from the date of\n\navailability of the bidding documents.\n\nvi. All bidding for goods and works shall be carried out through a one-envelope procedure.\n\nvii. Evaluation of bids shall be made in strict adherence to the evaluation criteria specified in\n\nthe bidding documents. Evaluation criteria other than price shall be quantified in monetary\nterms. Merit points shall not be used, and no minimum point or percentage value shall be\nassigned to the significance of price, in bid evaluation.\n\nviii. The results of evaluation and award of contract shall be made public. All bids shall not be\n\nrejected and the procurement process shall not be cancelled, a failure of bidding declared,\nnew bids shall not be solicited, nor shall negotiated procurement in case of a failure of\nbidding be resorted to without the Association’s prior written concurrence. Negotiations\nshall not be allowed except in the case of a lowest evaluated responsive bid which exceeds\nthe Recipient’s updated cost estimate by a substantial margin, to try to obtain a satisfactory\ncontract through a reduction in the scope of works/supply and reallocation of risk which\ncan be reflected in a reduction in contract price.\n\nix. In accordance with para.1.16(e) of the Procurement Guidelines, each bidding document and\n\ncontract financed out of the proceeds of the Financing shall provide that: (i) the bidders,\nsuppliers, contractors and subcontractors, agents, personnel, consultants, service providers,\nor suppliers shall permit the Association, at its request, to inspect all accounts, records and\ncomments relating to the bid submission and performance of the contract, and to have\nthem audited by auditors appointed by the Association; and (ii) Acts intended to materially\nimpede the exercise of the Association’s audit and inspection rights constitutes an\nobstructive practice as defined in the para. 1.16 a (v) of the Procurement Guidelines.\n\n91. _**Uganda**_ **:** Procurement in Uganda is governed by the Public Procurement and Disposal of\nPublic Assets (PPDA) Act of 2003. The procedures in the PPDA Act have been reviewed by the\n\n\n104\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 118
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Association and found to be acceptable subject to the following exceptions which will not be\napplicable under this project:\n\n\n(i) **Negotiations with the best evaluated bidder:** Shall not apply for goods/non consulting\nservices and works procured using competitive methods. However for civil works,\ntechnical discussions to agree on work programs, method statement and other technical\nmatters related to contract implementation with an awarded bidder are permissible.\n(ii) **The merit point evaluation for goods and works for bid evaluation:** This shall not be\n\napplied for goods and works contracts except for information technology systems.\n(iii) **Application of Domestic Preference:** Domestic Preference shall only be applied under\n\nInternational Competitive Bidding.\n(iv) **Micro-procurement** : Micro-procurement as defined in the PPDA Act will only apply for\n\ncontracts estimated to cost the equivalent of US$200 or less in case of unforeseen\ncircumstances only.\n(v) **Charging of fees for dealing with bidder complaints at procuring entity level:** The\nprocuring entities shall not be allowed to charge fees for dealing with complaints.\n(vi) **Selection of Consultants:** The procedures for Selection of Consultants under the PPDA\n\nAct shall not apply. Only the Association’s guidelines shall apply for selection of all\nConsultants under the project.\n(vii) **Evaluation of Goods and Works:** The following documentation or their equivalent shall\n\nnot be treated as eligibility requirements: (i) Tax clearance certificates; (ii) Tax\nregistration certificates; (iii) trading licenses; and (iv) the PPDA Certificate of\nRegistration. Documents (i) – (iii) may however be included as post qualification\nrequirements, which the Recipient can request the Bidder to avail during the evaluation.\n(viii) **Disqualification of Bidders** for not purchasing the bidding documents from the\n\nRecipient shall not apply.\n(ix) **Ineligibility** shall, in addition to firms suspended by PPDA, extend to firms debarred or\n\nsuspended by IDA.\n(x) **Registration in the PPDA** s: Register of Providers shall neither be an eligibility nor\nqualification requirement.\n\n92. **IGAD** is an intergovernmental organization and serves as the Secretariat for the\ncoordination of the intergovernmental development activities of member countries. IGAD does\nnot have its own Standard Bidding Documents for the procurement of goods, works and services.\nHence IGAD shall use the Association’s Standard Bidding Documents for International\nCompetitive Bidding for NCB contracts with appropriate modifications\n\n\n**Implementation Arrangements and Risk Assessment**\n\n93. The overall responsibility for procurement of works and goods and selection of\nconsultants will be carried out at national level, regional and districts in each country.\nCommunities shall also be involved in the procurement process in the participating countries and\nhow the communities shall be involved in the procurement process shall be stipulated in the\ncommunity procurement manuals to be developed/adapted in the respective countries, as\nappropriate. The description of implementation arrangements and assessments of the\nagencies/entities’ capacity to handle and manage procurement in each country is provided below.\n\n\n105\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 119
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "94. **Djibouti:** The implementing agency for the proposed Development Response to\nDisplacement Impacts Project is ADDS, which does not follow the provisions of the Public\nProcurement Code adopted in 2009, but which has a special status for procurement procedures.\nThis legal framework for ADDS, deemed acceptable, includes the existence of a market\ncommission that can meet at any time compared with the weekly one provided by the\nprocurement code, and a simplified contract signatures circuit. ADDS has experiences in\nimplementing Bank financed projects and is currently undertaking three Bank financed projects.\nADDS has a manual of procedures for all projects. This manual has a section on procurement,\nwhich is reviewed and approved by the Bank. Procedures adopted by ADDS are considered to\nbe efficient at least in terms of signing of contracts. For the implementation of the project ADDS\nshall establish a PIU and recruit the necessary staff including an additional consultant for\nprocurement.\n\n\n95. A procurement capacity assessment was carried out in ADDS to identify procurement\nrisks during project preparation and implementation stages and monitor them throughout the\nproject cycle.\n\n\n96. Weaknesses identified include the following: (i) lack of an archives room and documents\nclassified incomplete (parts not available markets); (ii) limited experience of the team in charge\nof procurement in international bids, (iii) lack of internal control, (iv) delays in submitting\nprocurement documents such as evaluations’ reports, (v) difficulties in the management of\ncontracts which involve delays in implementation and; (vi) there is no clear mechanism in place\nfor procurement oversight and resolution of complaints.\n\n\n97. In view of the foregoing identified weaknesses and risks in the system the procurement\nrisk for the project in Djibouti is rated Substantial. Table 4.4 provides the recommended risk\nmitigation measures.\n\n\n**Table 4.4. Action Plan to Mitigate the Procurement Risks (Djibouti)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Identified Risks|Mitigation Measures|Completion Date|Responsible
Body|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|ADDS does not maintain all
the necessary and mandatory
documentation for each
contract|Ensure that provisions are
included in the Operations Manual
(OM), and that trainings are held
to ensure that project-specific files
are kept for all procurement, and
related transactions and are
maintained separately for each
contract.|Two months after
the effectiveness of
the project|ADDS|\n|Delays in procurement
processing and evaluation of
bids with a consequent delay
in project implementation|An experienced procurement
specialist will be added to the
team.|Two months after
project effectiveness|ADDS|\n|Procurement plans are not
systematically prepared,
updated, and published.
|ADDS shall prepare and update
procurement plans by including
contracts previously awarded and
to be procured in the next 12
months. Training shall be
provided on procurement plan|Two months after
project effectiveness|ADDS|\n\n\n106\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 120
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Lack of experience of the
staff in BD/RFP preparation,
shortlisting and evaluation|Provide basic training to the
procurement staff procurement
management of goods, works and
selection of consultants in regional
procurement training institutions
such as ESAMI and GIMPA|Two months after
project effectiveness|ADDS|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Lack of procurement
oversight and complaints
handling mechanism|ADDS shall include a complaints
handling
mechanism
in
its
manual.
Strengthen
internal
control
mechanism|During project
implementation|ADDS|\n\n\n\n98. **Ethiopia:** The implementation of the DRDIP in Ethiopia is streamlined in the Ministry\nof Agriculture and Natural Resources and line agencies at every level being accountable for\noversight and coordination. At the federal level MoANR will be responsible for the coordination\nand management of the procurement activities of the project. At the regional level, the\nimplementation of the procurement of the project shall be coordinated by the Bureau of\nAgriculture and Natural Resources while Woreda level management and implementation of the\nprogram shall be coordinated by the Woreda Agriculture and Natural Resources Offices whereas\nthe procurement activities shall be executed by the Woreda Finance and Economic Development\nOffices which are responsible for pooled procurement at woreda level. For the day to day\nmanagement and coordination of the project multisectoral structures shall be established at\nFederal, Regional and Woreda levels.\n\n\n99. In order to better understand the procurement environment under which the DRDIP is to\noperate a procurement capacity assessment was carried out. The procurement capacity\nassessment considers whether the system provides reasonable assurance that the proceeds under\nthe project will be used for intended purposes, with due attention to the principles of economy,\nefficiency, effectiveness, transparency, and accountability. This procurement assessment, for\nDRDIP in Ethiopia, included a Federal institution namely Ministry of Agriculture and Natural\nResources, and regional and woreda level institutions in Afar, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambela,\nSomali and Tigray Regional States. The procurement capacity assessment was carried out using\nP-RAMS questionnaire which consider 11 risk factors associated with procurement of each\ninstitution assessed. Previous capacity assessments carried out in the Federal Ministry of\nAgriculture and Natural Resources, as well as findings of procurement audits were also used as\ninput to this procurement capacity assessment.\n\n\n100. The procurement legal framework and systems of all assessed regions and woredas have,\namong others, provisions and requirements for realistic procurement planning, competitive\nprocurement being default procurement method and/or selections procedures, use of Standard\nBidding Documents and Standard Request For Proposals; requirements for bid evaluations to be\nmade based only on criteria specified in the issued bidding Documents/RFPs etc. But the major\nlimitations observed in almost all institutions/offices is that procuring entities do not fully\ncomply to this legal requirements and actual procurement processing may not be as per the\nprovided procurement legal framework. The specific procurement risks related to the Ethiopia,\nRegional Operation on Development Response to Displacement Impacts are: (a) though all the\nregional states and woredas assessed do have reasonably acceptable procurement legal\nframework and systems, the practical implementation of the rules and policies is assessed to be\nvery irregular and therefore may pose high risk to the planned operation under the project; (b)\n\n107\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5439797043800354,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.8168977499008179,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 167
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5519750714302063,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.8443447351455688,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 167
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement capacity assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.7502501606941223,
+ "start": 332,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement audits",
+ "confidence": 0.9372679591178894,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 466
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 121
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "although there are procurement staff provided in the regions and woredas there is lack of\nprocurement proficient staff at all level and there is a high level of staff turnover; (c) the system\nis trying to tackle the problem of lack of procurement proficient staff, however this effort is\nundermined by the high level of staff turnover. Since the current operation is to be carried out in\nsome of the remote areas of the country lack of procurement proficient personnel and high level\nof staff turnover is likely to be a major challenge to the procurement aspect of the project (d)\nweak systems of procurement oversight and complaints handling mechanism particularly in the\nregions and Woredas; (e) lack of experience and specific guidance on contracts administration\nare challenges across the assessed regions and Woreda administrations; (f) moreover, the\nassessment has clearly indicated that there are significant challenges in the areas of procurement\nplanning, procurement record keeping, use of Standard Bidding Documents/Standard Request\nFor Proposals in bids and selection of consultants, insufficient time allowed for the preparation\nand submission of bids/proposals, and challenges in bid evaluation and contract administrations;\nand (g) use of two envelope systems, use of merit point systems in evaluation and use of\nevaluation criteria not specified in the BDs/RFPs, etc. are challenges to be reckoned with\nparticularly in the regional and Woreda offices.\n\n\n101. In view of such challenges the risk to the procurement operations of the project is rated\nHIGH. In order to provide for such challenges recommended risk mitigation measures are\nprovided in Table 4.5.\n\n\n**Table 4.5. Summary of Findings and Actions (Risk Mitigation Matrix) for Ethiopia**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Major
findings/issues|Actions proposed|Responsibi
lity|Targeted date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Inadequate capacity
at the Ministry of
Agriculture and
Natural Resources
and the Regional
Bureaus of
Agriculture and
Natural Resources,
and woredas to be
included under the
project|1. Employment of qualified and procurement
proficient specialist acceptable to the Association
in The Ministry of Agriculture and Natural
Resources (MoANR) and Bureaus of Agriculture
and Natural Resources of Afar, Benshangul,
Gambela, Somali, and Tigray Regions
2. Procurement staffs should be provided with
basic procurement training offered at EMI in the
procurement of goods and equipment, works and
consultancy services.
3. Woreda procurement staff, and staff involved in
the implementation of procurement activities such
as procurement committee members and
procurement approval committee members should
be provided procurement clinics on procurement
procedures under Bank financed projects.
4. Provide procurement staff at MoANR, regions
and woredas with the necessary facilities to create
conducive working environment including
mobility to enable them to support procurement
activities in the regions and woredas.|
MoANR/
Regions
and
Woredas|Two months
after project
effectiveness|\n|Inadequate
procurement
planning particularly
at woreda level|1. Make procurement planning a requirement as
part of the preparation of work plans and budget
at woreda level.
2. Train procurement staff in the preparation and
use of procurement plans at all levels in the
Bureaus of Agriculture and Natural Resources,|MoANR/B
ureaus of
Agriculture
and Natural
Resources/
WoFEDs|During project
implementation|\n\n\n108\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 122
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Major
findings/issues|Actions proposed|Responsibi
lity|Targeted date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n||and WoFEDs.
3. Prepare simplified procurement plans and
distribute such forms for use in the woredas|||\n|The need for written
procedural
manuals/systems in
place including code
of ethics|1. Prepare the DRDIP procurement manual, which
provides detailed step by step procedures for the
implementation of the procurement activities of
the project;
2. Include code of ethics in the procurement
manual;
3. Disseminate the procurement manual to all
implementation agencies of the DRDIP.|MoANR/B
ureaus of
Agriculture
and Natural
Resources/
WoFEDS.|One month after
project
effectiveness
|\n|Lack of capacity in
procurement data
management and
maintenance of
procurement audit
trail
Inadequate facility
for storage of
procurement records|1. Offer clinic on procurement records keeping to
procurement staff of the DRDIP.
2. Establish satisfactory procurement data
management system.
3. Provide adequate facility for safekeeping and
storage of procurement records.|MoANR/B
ureaus of
Agriculture
and Natural
Resources/
WoFEDS.|During project
implementation|\n|Lack of experience
in contract
administration and
management|1. Establish a CM system in MoANR
2. Recruit and employ contract management staff
under MoANR to support regions and woredas in
contract management;
3. Provide training to the CM staff in contract
management at EMI.|MoANR|Within the first
six months of
the project|\n|Lack of oversight
bodies in the
Regions and
Woredas to monitor
and audit
procurement
activities in regional
and woreda
implementing
agencies|1. Government shall select and appoint an
independent
auditor,
acceptable
to
the
Association,
to
carry
out
an
Independent
Procurement Audit of the project annually and to
be submitted to the Association before January 7
of each calendar year.|MoANR|Annually
during project
implementation|\n\n\n\n102. _**Uganda**_ **:** The DRDIP shall be implemented at three levels; (i) at the central government\nlevel in the Office of the Prime Minister, (ii) at the local government level – Districts, and (iii) at\nthe community level. Government procurement is governed by the Procurement and Disposal of\nPublic Assets Law, the PPDA Act 2003, which is generally consistent with the World Bank\nGuidelines, except for some provisions that are considered exceptions. The Law requires that\neach entity put in place procurement oversight structures to execute the procurement function in\nthe agency. The structures of the Procurement and Disposal Unit (PDU) and a Contracts\nCommittee are in place at OPM.\n\n\n103. A procurement capacity assessment was carried out in LG and community level to assess\nthe adequacy of the procurement and technical staffing, as well as the internal systems and\ncontrols to execute procurement of the DRDIP in Uganda, identify risks to the project, and agree\n\n109\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 123
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "on mitigation measures. Some of the findings of the capacity assessment include the following:\n(i) at LG level there is high rate of noncompliance to the requirements of the PPDA ACT, limited\ncompetition and incomplete/abandoned works; (ii) the bidding process in PDU is well managed.\nHowever, it is noted that the capacity to prepare terms of reference and technical specification is\nlow; (iii) bid evaluation criteria are disclosed in the BDs and evaluations are conducted in\naccordance with the criteria. However, there are observed delays in the evaluation of bids and\nproposals owing to understaffing and other reasons; (iv) contract documents are well prepared\nbut there are delays in signing of contracts; (v) procurement files reviewed were found to be\ngenerally complete, but contracts register and payment and contract committee minutes were\nmissing, the different stages of procurement were not demarcated in the files; and the current\nseating arrangement poses a high risk to the integrity and safe keeping of procurement records;\n(vi) all PDU staff have adequate qualifications but have no experience in IDA financed\nprocurement management; and (vii) understaffing in the PDU and technical departments also\nposes high risk to the implementation of the proposed project; and (viii) limited training of the\ncommunities to conduct procurement.\n\n\n104. In light of the quantity, nature and size of procurement activities to be carried out under\nthe project, lack of proficiency of the PDU staff in IDA financed procurement, and the\ninadequate number of technical staff members in the technical Departments the overall\nprocurement risk of the proposed the DRDIP in Uganda is rated HIGH.\n\n\n105. Table 4.6 summarizes the proposed actions to mitigate the risks.\n\n\n**Table 4.6. Action Plan to Mitigate the Procurement Risks for Uganda**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Risk|Action|Completion Date|Responsible
Entity|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|National procurement
procedures are not fully
consistent with Bank
procedures|Financing Agreement shall include the
exception provisions|At Negotiations|IDA/ OPM|\n|Limited experience of the
Office of the Prime
Minister staff in IDA
financed procurement
management and
inadequate number of staff
to manage workload under
the DRDIP|Recruit a Procurement Specialist with ToR
acceptable to IDA to provide hands-on
coaching and mentoring of PDU staff|One month after
project
effectiveness|OPM|\n|Limited experience of the
Office of the Prime
Minister staff in IDA
financed procurement
management and
inadequate number of staff
to manage workload under
the DRDIP|PDU staff to attend training at a procurement
training institute (GIMPA) in procurement of
works; and selection of consultants|Six months after
Effectiveness|OPM|\n|Inadequate number of
Technical Staff to handle
work load|Recruit additional staff / consultants in
technical departments to augment existing
capacity|Six months after
Effectiveness|OPM|\n|Inadequate seating
arrangement for PDU with
PDU sharing office space
with other staff|OPM shall partition off space for the PDU to
ensure integrity of the procurement records|Six months after
Effectiveness|OPM|\n|Inadequate record keeping
due to incomplete records,
and improper securing of
bids|PDU will ensure completeness of procurement
files particularly to include contract
management records, contracts committee
minutes and to ensure bids are well secured|Six months after
effectiveness and
during project
implementation|OPM|\n|Clarity on
roles/coordination between|Prepare a project procurement manual or
include a section on procurement in PIM and|Six months after
Effectiveness|OPM|\n\n\n110\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 124
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|user departments and PDU|the community procurement manual to clarify
IDA procedures and to disseminate to
implementing agencies|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Delays in procurement
processing|Put in place a procurement tracking system to
monitor the progress by the PDU of processing
different contracts|Six months after
Effectiveness|OPM|\n|Inadequate buy in by
targeted stakeholders|Identify the stakeholders at different levels
(policy, strategy or implementation), and
establish a forum, format and other ways to
bring the project information to other
stakeholders|Six months after
Effectiveness||\n\n\n\n106. **IGAD** is an intergovernmental organization and serves as the Secretariat for the\ncoordination of the intergovernmental development activities of member countries. Because of\nthis unique nature of the Secretariat there is no clear legal framework which guides procurement\nactivities under the Secretariat. Moreover, being an intergovernmental organization the authority\nreceives grants from various Development Partners to carry out specific studies and coordination\nof developmental activities in member countries. Consequently, the procurement unit of the\nauthority has to follow procurement procedures of the various Development Partners, which\nprovide support to the Authority.\n\n\n107. The procurement unit of the Authority is organized under the Directorate for Finance and\nAdministration. The procurement unit was organized in 2013 and is staffed by one senior\nprocurement officer and an assistant. This team carries out procurement activities for almost all\nprojects executed by IGAD. The Executive Secretary appoints a procurement committee which\nprovides an oversight over the procurement activities of IGAD.\n\n\n108. The Executive Secretary of IGAD appoints the procurement committee, which is incharge of reviewing procurement recommendations made by the evaluation committee. The\nevaluation committee is composed of user departments and it usually has observers from donor\npartners and from internal audit. Final procurement approvals are, however, made by the\nExecutive Secretary of the Authority.\n\n\n109. IGAD has its own procurement manual developed in July 2012 and revised on 31st\nMarch 2014. This manual provides directives as to how procurement should be carried out but it\nis not consistent in some keys points with Bank’s Procurement and Consultant Guidelines.\nHowever, IGAD has developed a manual for an ongoing Bank financed project—RPLRP—and\nit is recommended that IGAD should adapt this manual for the DRDIP. IGAD does not have its\nown Standard Bidding Documents/Standard Request for Proposals but uses the BDs and RFPs of\ndonor organizations.\n\n\n110. IGAD has currently an experienced procurement officer based in Djibouti and who is in\ncharge of the procurement unit under Directorate for Finance and Administration. For this\nproject, it was agreed that the procurement function will be handled by a procurement staff to be\nhired for the Regional Secretariat Office based in Nairobi.\n\n\n111. Some of the other findings of the procurement capacity assessment include (i)\nprocurement records are not complete and are kept partly in the finance unit and partly in the\nprocurement unit; (ii) there is no a formal mechanism to review and resolve complaints which is\nknown to bidders and this is not provided in the manual; (iii) procurement at IGAD appears to\n\n111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 125
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "have challenges in the preparation of BDs/RFPs, procurement planning and regular updating;\nand (iv) there needs to be a strengthened internal control system.\n\n\n112. The overall project risk for procurement is rated “ **Substantial** ” due to the above\nchallenges in the procurement system in IGAD. The proposed risk mitigation measures are\nsummarized below.\n\n\n**Action Plan to Mitigate Procurement Risks**\n\n113. Table 4.7 provides a summary of actions to mitigate the above risks.\n\n\n**Table 4.7. Summary of Findings and Actions (Risk Mitigation Matrix)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|No.|Major findings/issues|Actions proposed|Responsibility|Targeted date|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|1.|Inadequate capacity at
IGAD to handle
procurement activities of
the Regional Secretariat|1. Recruit a qualified and procurement
proficient Procurement Officer
acceptable to the Association for the
DRDIP
|IGAD|Before project
effectiveness|\n|2.|Inadequate procurement
planning|1. Make procurement planning a
requirement as part of annual work
plans and budget.
2. Train procurement staff in
procurement planning|IGAD|Within a month
after the date of
project
effectiveness|\n|3.|Lack of written procedural
manual/systems on
procurement|1.Update current procurement manual
of Bank financed projects for the
DRDIP|IGAD|Before project
effectiveness
|\n|4.|Lack of capacity for
satisfactory data
management and
maintenance of
procurement audit trail|1. Training on procurement records
keeping to be provided to procurement
staff of IGAD
2. Establish satisfactory procurement
data management system|IGAD|During project
implementation|\n|5.|Weaknesses in internal
control and weak capacity
of procurement oversight|1.Conduct post procurement review of
procurement activities of the DRDIP at
IGAD
2.Strengthen the internal control|World
Bank/IGAD|During project
implementation|\n\n\n\n**B.** **Frequency of Procurement Supervision**\n\n114. In addition to the prior review supervision to be carried out from Bank offices, the\ncapacity assessments of the Implementing Agencies has recommended semi-annual supervision\nmissions to conduct field visits, of which at least one mission will involve post review of\nprocurement actions. Table 4.8 provides the Prior Review Threshold.\n\n\n\n**Table 4.8. Procurement of Goods and Works**\n**Expenditure** **Contract Value (Threshold)**\n\n\n\n**Procurement**\n\n**Method**\n\n\n\n**Contracts Subject to**\n\n**Prior Review**\n\n\n\n**Category**\n\n\n\n**US$**\n\n\n\n112\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Risk Mitigation Matrix",
+ "confidence": 0.680586576461792,
+ "start": 108,
+ "end": 111
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Summary of Findings and Actions",
+ "confidence": 0.6698565483093262,
+ "start": 102,
+ "end": 107
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.625140905380249,
+ "start": 57,
+ "end": 58
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement manual",
+ "confidence": 0.8225985169410706,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 312
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement audit trail",
+ "confidence": 0.5716824531555176,
+ "start": 364,
+ "end": 367
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data management system",
+ "confidence": 0.5493912100791931,
+ "start": 400,
+ "end": 403
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.6089326739311218,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "capacity assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.8983492851257324,
+ "start": 511,
+ "end": 513
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Table 4.8",
+ "confidence": 0.6851426959037781,
+ "start": 541,
+ "end": 545
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 126
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|1. Works|> 2,000,000 (for Djibouti)
≥7,000,000 (for Ethiopia)
≥ 10,000,000 (for Uganda)
>2,000,000 (for IGAD)
≤ 2,000,000 (for Djibouti)
< 7,000,000 (for Ethiopia)
< 10,000,000 (for Uganda)
≤ 2,000,000 (for IGAD)
< 200,000 (for all countries)|International
Competitive
Bidding
National
Competitive
Bidding
Shopping|All Contracts
Selected Contracts as indicated on
Procurement Plan
None|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|2. Goods|>300,000 (for Djibouti)
≥1,000,000 (for Ethiopia
≥1,000,000 (for Uganda)
>300,000 (for IGAD)
≤ 300,000 (for Djibouti)
< 1,000,000 (for Ethiopia)
< 1,000,000 (for Uganda)
≤ 300,000 (for IGAD)
<100,000 (for Uganda, and Ethiopia)
≤ 50,000 (for Djibouti and IGAD)|International
Competitive
Bidding
National
Competitive
Bidding
Shopping|All Contracts
Selected Contracts as indicated on
Procurement Plan
None|\n\n\n\n115. Contracts below the threshold but falling within an exception as defined in clause 5.4 of\nthe Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants are also subject to prior review or\nrequire the Association’s prior no objection (table 4.9). Special cases beyond the defined\nthresholds are allowed based on applicable market conditions.\n\n\n**Table 4.9. Selection of Consultants**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Expenditure
Category|Contract Value (Threshold)
US$|Selection Method|Contracts Subject to
Prior Review|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|(a) Firms
|>=300,000
<300,000
All values|QCBS, QBS, LCS, FBS
CQS
SSS|All contracts
All contracts equal or
above US$200,000
All contracts|\n|(b) Individual|>=100,000
All values|IC
SSS|All contracts
All contracts|\n\n\n\n**Note:**\n**(i)** Irrespective of the thresholds and category of risk, the selection of all consultants (firms or individuals) hired for\nlegal work or for procurement activities are respectively cleared by the LEG VPU unit with the relevant expertise\nand the designated PS/PAS or RPM as required.\n**(ii)** Thresholds for which a shortlist may comprise only national consultants and the Recipient does not publish in\nUNDB online.\n\n**Readiness for Implementation and Procurement Plan**\n\n116. Procurement Plans were prepared and discussed during project appraisal in each country.\nThe Plans are prepared in a format acceptable to IDA. The plans are agreed between the\nRecipients and the Project Teams and will be available in each Ministry/Focal Organization in\nthe respective countries. They will also be available in the project databases and on the\nAssociation’s external website. The Procurement Plans will be updated annually or as required in\nagreement with the Project Teams to reflect the actual project implementation needs and\n\n113\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 127
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "improvements in institutional capacity. Details of the Procurement Arrangements are provided\nbelow for each country.\n\n\n117. Goods, Works, and Nonconsulting Services\n\n\n(a) List of contract packages to be procured following International Competitive Bidding and\ndirect contracting:\n\n\n114\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 128
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Goods, Works, and Non consulting Services**\n\n**A.** **Djibouti**\n\n**Table 4.10. List of contract packages to be procured following International Competitive Bidding and Direct Contracting**\n**Procedures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref.**
**No**|**Contract ( Description)**|**Estimated**
**Cost ($)**|**Procurement**
**Method**|**Pre-**
**qualification**
**(Yes/No)**|**Domestic**
**preference**|**Review by**
**bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected Bid**
**Opening Date**|\n|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|\n|1|LIC Equipment|870,000.00|ICB|Post|No|Prior|15 November 16|\n|2|Local supplies/community|95,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|15 December 16|\n|3|Improved households|182,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|31 Mar 17|\n|4|Purchase of equipment|500,000.00|ICB|Post|No|Prior|28 Apr 17|\n|5|Purchase of vehicles|125,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|15 May 17|\n|6|Equipment for ONARS Training Center|85,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|15 May 17|\n|Sub Total|Sub Total|**1,857,000.00**||||||\n|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|\n|1|Additional classrooms and fencing for 5 high
schools/rehabilitation and construction of dormitory
and sanitary block|933,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|27 Apr 17|\n|2|Construction of a secondary school and dormitory|1,000,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|17 May 17|\n|3|HILO/Roadwork|480,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|29 Jun 17|\n|4|Rehabilitation/Extension of Health Centers|780,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|17 May 17|\n|5|Extension of power network|1,380,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|15 Mar 17|\n|6|Construction of community premises|101,000.00|Shopping|Post|No|Post|24 May 17|\n|7|Construction in agropastoral areas|1,055,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|12 May 17|\n|8|Extension work of a solar plant|1,524,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|5 May 17|\n|Subtotal|Subtotal|**6,320,000.00**||||||\n\n\n_Note:_ NCB = National Competitive Bidding.\n\n\n115\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 129
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**B.** **Ethiopia**\n\n**Table 4.12.** **List of contract packages to be procured following ICB, National Competitive Bidding, and Direct Contracting: Goods,**\n**Works, and Non consulting Services**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref.**
**No.**|**Contract**
**(Description)**|**Estimated**
**Cost US$**|**Procurement**
**Method**|**Prequali**
**fication**
**(yes/no)**|**Domestic**
**Preferenc**
**e **
**(yes/no)**|**Review**
**by Bank**
**(Prior/P**
**ost)**|**Expected**
**Bid-Opening**
**Date**|**Expected**
**Contract**
**Signing Date**|\n|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|\n|1|30 vehicles|2,960,743.00|ICB|Post|No|Prior|July 15, 2016|September 5,
2016|\n|2|160 Motorcycles|530,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|July 25,2016|September 16,
2016|\n|3|Generator|2,050,000.00|ICB|Post|No|Prior|July 29, 2016|September 30,
2016|\n|4|IT and Office Equipment|682,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|June 24, 2016|July 29, 2016|\n|5|Water pumps|82,000.00|Shopping|Post|No|Post|October 17, 2016|December 5,
2016|\n|6|Filed equipment|12,000.00|Shopping|Post|No|Post|October 17, 2016|December
5,2016|\n|7|Furniture|23,000.00|Shopping|Post|No|Post|May 27,2016|July 11, 2016|\n|8|Solar Lighting|23,000.00|Shopping|Post|No|Post|March 6,2017|May 8, 2017|\n|9|Laboratory Equipment|1,140,000.00|ICB|Post|No|Prior|March 6, 2017|May 31, 2017|\n|10|Artificial Insemination Kits|682,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|March 13,2017|May 24, 2017|\n|11|Chemicals|480,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Post|March 20, 2017|May 31,2017|\n|12|Improved Cooking Stoves|910,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|January 2,2017|March 6, 2017|\n|13|Demonstration materials|910,000.00|NCB|Post|No|Prior|January 9,2017|March 13,2017|\n|Sub Total|Sub Total|**11,123,747.00**|||||||\n|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|\n|1|Construction of primary schools|910,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|January 2, 2017|March 6,2017|\n\n\n116\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 130
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref.**
**No.**|**Contract**
**(Description)**|**Estimated**
**Cost US$**|**Procurement**
**Method**|**Prequali**
**fication**
**(yes/no)**|**Domestic**
**Preferenc**
**e **
**(yes/no)**|**Review**
**by Bank**
**(Prior/P**
**ost)**|**Expected**
**Bid-Opening**
**Date**|**Expected**
**Contract**
**Signing Date**|\n|2|Construction of human health post|500,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|January 9, 2017|March 13, 2017|\n|3|Construction of animal health post|682,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|February 6,2017|April 14,2017|\n|4|Construction of water supply|1,140,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|February
13,
2017|April 21, 2017|\n|5|Poultry house construction|250,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|February
20,
2017|April 28, 2017|\n|6|Construction/ upgrading of institution
buildings|700,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|January 16, 2017|March 20,2017|\n|7|Construction of feeder road|1,000,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|September
4,
2017|November
17,2017|\n|8|Construction
of
crop
and
horticulture
primary markets|4,750,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|January 23,2017|March 27, 2017|\n|9|Construction of Animal primary markets|1,000,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|Feb. 27,2017|April 28, 2017|\n|10|Construction of Milk collection centers|455,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|March 6, 2017|May 15,2107|\n|11|Construction of Honey collection centers|455,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|March 13,2017|May 22, 2017|\n|12|Construction of market shades|800,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|April 3,2017|June 16, 2017|\n|13|Construction of Warehouses for primary
crops|1,820,000.00|NCB|Post|NO|Post|April 10, 2017|June 23, 2017|\n|14|Construction of biogas plant|230,000.00|NCB|post|No|Post|April 17,2017|June 30, 2017|\n|Sub Total|Sub Total|**14,682,724.00**|||||||\n\n\nICB contracts estimated to cost above US$1,000,000 for Goods and non-consulting services and NCB contracts estimated to cost above US$500,000 for Goods\nand Non-consulting services and ICB contracts estimated to cost more than US$7,000,000 for Works per contract NCB contracts estimated to cost more than\nUS$5,000,000 and all direct contracting will be subject to prior review by the Bank\n\n\n_Note:_ ICB = International Competitive Bidding; NCB = National Competitive Bidding.\n\n\n117\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 131
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**C.** **Uganda**\n\n\n**Table 4.10. List of Contract Packages to be Procured Following International Competitive Bidding and Direct Contracting**\n**Procedures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Contract**
**(Description)**|**Estimated**
**Cost US$**|**Procurement**
**Method**|**Prequalific**
**ation**
**(yes/no)**|**Domestic**
**Preference**
**(yes/no)**|**Review**
**by Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**Bid-Opening**
**Date**|**Expected**
**Contract Signing**
**Date**|\n|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|**Goods**|\n|1|2 Vehicles (Executive)|260,000|NCB|No|No|Post|February 2017|April 2017|\n|2|3 vehicles for project implementation
team and 1 for planning unit (4)|350,000|NCB|No|No|Prior|February 2017|April 2017|\n|3|1 Double Cabin Vehicle per district
(4)|200,000|NCB|No|No|Post|November 2016|January 2017|\n|4|14 Motorcycles|50,000|Shopping|No|No|Post|November 2016|January 2017|\n|5|Information technology and office
equipment|70,000|Shopping|No|No|Post|October 2016|December 2016|\n|6|Furniture|80,000|Shopping|No|No|Post|September 2016|November 2016|\n|Subtotal|Subtotal|**1,010,000**|||||||\n|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|**Works**|\n|1|Construction, rehabilitation or
expansion of schools including staff
accommodation|4,000,000|NCB|No|NO|Prior|March 2017|May 2017|\n|2|Construction, rehabilitation and
expansion of health Centers including
staff accommodation|2,000,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|March 2017|May 2017|\n|3|Construction of roads|2,000,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|February 2017|April 2017|\n|4|Construction of water supply|2,000,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|June 2017|August 2017|\n|5|Construction of market shades in rural
towns|500,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|March 2017|May 2017|\n|6|Construction of grain storages|500,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|June 2017|August 2017|\n\n\n118\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 132
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Contract**
**(Description)**|**Estimated**
**Cost US$**|**Procurement**
**Method**|**Prequalific**
**ation**
**(yes/no)**|**Domestic**
**Preference**
**(yes/no)**|**Review**
**by Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**Bid-Opening**
**Date**|**Expected**
**Contract Signing**
**Date**|\n||facilities||||||||\n|7|Construction fish ponds|1,200,0000|NCB|No|NO|Post|April 2017|June 2017|\n|8|Construction of small scale irrigation|800,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|October 2016|December 2016|\n|9|Raising seedlings|500,000|NCB|No|NO|Post|October 2016|December 2016|\n|Sub Total|Sub Total|**13,500,000**|||||||\n\n\na. ICB contracts estimated to cost above US$1,000,000 for Goods and non consulting services and NCB contracts estimated to cost above US$500,000 for\n\ngoods and non-consulting services and ICB contracts estimated to cost more than US$10,000,000 for Works per contract NCB contracts estimated to cost\nmore than US$5,000,000 and all direct contracting will be subject to prior review by the Bank.\nb. ICB contracts estimated to cost above US$1,000,000 for Goods and non consulting services and NCB contracts estimated to cost above US$500,000 for\n\ngoods and non-consulting services and ICB contracts estimated to cost more than US$7,000,000 for Works per contract NCB contracts estimated to cost\nmore than US$5,000,000 and all direct contracting will be subject to prior review by the Bank.\nc. _Note:_ ICB = International Competitive Bidding; NCB = National Competitive Bidding.\n\n\n119\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 133
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**D.** **IGAD**\n\n**Table 4.11. List of Contract Packages to be Procured Following International Competitive Bidding and Direct Contracting**\n**Procedures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Ref.
No.|Contract (Description)|Estimated
Cost US$|Procurement
Method|Prequalification
(yes/no)|Domestic
Preferenc
e (yes/no)|Review by
Bank
(Prior/Post)|Expected
Bid-
Opening
Date|Commen
ts|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Rental of office space|54,000|Shopping|No|No|Post|1 April 16||\n|2|Procurement of Office Equipment|9500|Shopping|No|No|Post|3 July 16||\n|3|Procurement of Office Furniture|10,500|Shopping|No|No|Post|17 July 16||\n|4|Printing of Durable Solution Framework and
Research
Paper
on
Displacement
&
Development|40,000|Shopping|No|No|Post|29 Dec. 16||\n|**Sub Total**|**Sub Total**|**119,000**|||||||\n\n\n120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 134
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**CONSULTING SERVICES**\n\n118. Short list comprising entirely of national consultants: Short list of consultants for services, estimated to cost less than $300,000\nequivalent per contract, may comprise entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the\nConsultant Guidelines.\n\n\n**A.** **Djibouti**\n\n**Table 4.12. List of Consulting Assignments with Short List of International Firms**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Description|Estimated Cost|Currency|Post or prior
review|Consultancy
type (firm or
individual)|Selection
Method|Expected
Proposals
Soumission
Date|Expected
Contract
Signing Date|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Component 1:**Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|Component 1:**Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**|Component 1:**Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure**||||||\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for extension works
/construction/ rehabilitation of school and
health premises in obock, Ali-Addé and
Holl-Holl|272,000.00
|US$
|Prior
|Firm
|QCBS
|11/15/2016
|
1/24/2017
|\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for the grid network
extension in Obock and Holl-Holl|138,000.00
|US$
|Prior
|Firm
|QCBS
|12/15/2016
|2/23/2017
|\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision in roads for HILO works
in Obock|48,000.00
|US$
|Post
|Firm
|QCBS|11/10/2016
|1/19/2017
|\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for drilling works and
rehabilitation of water distribution network
in Obock, Ali Addé and Holl-Holl|198,000.00
|US$
|Prior
|Firm
|
QCBS|11/25/2016
|2/3/2017
|\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for the construction of
local premises in Ali-Addé|11,000.00
|US$
|Post
|Firm
|
QCBS|2/9/2017
|4/20/2017
|\n\n\n\n121\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 135
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for geophysics studies of
water points in Obock, Holl-Holl et Ali-
Addé|150,000.00|US$|Prior|Firm|QCBS|9/5/2017|10/15/2017|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Component 2:**Sustainable Environmental Management**|Component 2:**Sustainable Environmental Management**|Component 2:**Sustainable Environmental Management**|Component 2:**Sustainable Environmental Management**||
|||\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for the creation of the
agropastoral areas and
upgrading/reinforcement of existing areas|107,000.00
|US$
|Prior
|Firm
|QCBS
|12/10/2016
|2/18/2017|\n|Recruitment of consultant for the design
and supervision for the solar plant
extension and Ali-Addé drilling|153,000.00
|US$
|Prior
|Firm
|QCBS|03/27/2017
|6/5/2017
|\n|Component 4:**Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation**|Component 4:**Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation**|Component 4:**Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation**|Component 4:**Project Management, and Monitoring and Evaluation**|||||\n|Project coordinator|45,000|US$|Prior|Individual|IC
|11/18/2016|12/13/2016|\n|Infrastructure Engineer|36,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|11/18/2016|12/16/2016|\n|4 high-level technicians (23400/technician)|93,600|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|12/20/2017|1/20/2017|\n|Agriculture Specialist|36,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|01/13/2017|2/7/2017|\n|Environmental and Social Safeguard
Specialist|36,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|12/8/2016|1/2/2017|\n|Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist|36,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|1/13/2017|7/2/2017|\n|Accountant|36,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|1/13/2017|2/7/2017|\n|Project Assistant|18,000|US$|Post|Individual|IC
|12/30/2016|1/30/2017|\n|Procurement Manager|36,000|US$|Prior|Individual|IC|1/13/2017|2/7/2017|\n|Financial Audit|20,000|US$|Post|Firm|LCS|5/4/2017|6/13/2017|\n|Baseline / monitoring and
evaluation/impact study|300,000|US$|Prior|Firm|QCBS|5/4/2017|6/13/2017|\n|ONARS||||||||\n|International expert in Strategy /ONARS
(1)|30,000|US$|Post|individual|IC|2/7/2017|3/19/2017|\n|International expert in procedures manual
/ONARS (3)|85,000|US$|Prior|Individual|IC|4/5/2017|5/5/2017|\n|Legal Expert (2)|11,268|US$|Prior|individual|IC|3/4/2017|4/4/2017|\n\n\n122\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 136
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Ethiopia**\n\n**Table 4.13. List of Consulting Assignments with Short List of International Firms and Individual Consultants**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref.**
**No.**|**Description of Assignment**|**Estimated**
**Cost (US$)**|**Selection**
**Method**|**Review by**
**Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**Proposals**
**Submission**
**Date**|**Expected Contract Signing**
**Date**|\n|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|\n|1.|Baseline survey|100,000|QCBS|Post|Aug. 8, 2016|Oct. 10, 2016|\n|2|Design and supervision of construction
works|80,000|LCS|Post|July 6,2016|Aug. 26, 2016|\n|3|TA for honey production|7,000|IC|Post|Feb. 6, 2017|March 24, 2017|\n|4|TA for fish hatchery|7,000|IC|Post|Feb 13, 2017|March 31, 2017|\n|5|TA for usage and plantation of biogas|7,000|IC|Post|Feb. 20, 2017|April 7, 2017|\n|6|Training on savings, financial literacy,
bookkeeping, financial planning and credit
management|20,000|LCS|Post|Feb. 27, 2017|April 14, 2017|\n|7|Training on post-harvest and marketing|20,000|IC|Post|Feb. 28, 2017|April 21, 2017|\n|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|**_Project staff at Federal Level_**|\n|1|Project Coordinator|14,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|2|M & E Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|3|Infrastructure Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|4|Senior Livelihood specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|5|Senior
Natural
Resource
Management
Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April25,2016
|June17,2016|\n|6|Contract Administration Expert|13,000.00|IC|Prior|Prior|June17,2016|\n|7|Information Technology Expert|13,000.00|IC|Prior|Prior|June17,2016|\n|8|Senior CDD Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Prior|Prior|June17,2016|\n|9|Senior Procurement Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Prior|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|10|Senior Financial Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Prior|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|11|Internal auditor|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|12|Senior Environmental Safeguard Specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n|13|Senior Social safeguard specialist|13,000.00|IC|Post|April 25,2016|June 17, 2016|\n\n\n123\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "List of Consulting Assignments",
+ "confidence": 0.9840331673622131,
+ "start": 12,
+ "end": 16
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.9830081462860107,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 3
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Baseline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9960391521453857,
+ "start": 255,
+ "end": 257
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7651423215866089,
+ "start": 256,
+ "end": 257
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Post",
+ "confidence": 0.9739832282066345,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.5902585387229919,
+ "start": 270,
+ "end": 271
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8143259882926941,
+ "start": 270,
+ "end": 271
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TA for honey production",
+ "confidence": 0.734080970287323,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Post",
+ "confidence": 0.8181038498878479,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.740020751953125,
+ "start": 330,
+ "end": 331
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 137
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|1|Col2|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref.**
**No.**|**Ref.**
**No.**|**Description of Assignment**|**Estimated**
**Cost (US$)**|**Selection**
**Method**|**Review by**
**Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**Proposals**
**Submission**
**Date**|**Expected Contract Signing**
**Date**|\n|14|14|Independent Procurement Auditor|150,000|QCBS|Prior|Mar 13, 2017|April 28,2017|\n|15|15|Accountant|120,000|LCS|Post|March 6,2017|April 21,2017|\n|16|16|Procurement Officer|10,000|IC|Post|March 6,2017|April 21,2017|\n|17|17|Casher|7,000|IC|post|March 6,2017|April 21,2017|\n|18|18|Office Assistant|5000|IC|post|March 6,2017|April 21,2017|\n|19|19|Drivers ( 5)|14,500|IC|post|March 6,2017|April 21,2017|\n|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|**_Program staff at Regional Level_**|\n|1|1|Project Coordinator|7,000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|2|2|Natural Resource Management Specialist|6,000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|3|3|Livelihood Specialist|6,000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|4|4|M & E Specialist|6,000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|5|5|Infrastructure Specialist|6,000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|6|6|Accountant|6,500.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|7|7|Procurement Officer|6,500.00|IC|Prior|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|8|8|Environmental and Social Safeguard
Specialist|6000.00|IC|Post|May 16, 2016|June 30, 2016|\n|9|9|Secretary/Casher|7,000|IC|post|May 16,2016|June 30,2016|\n|10|10|Office Assistant|4000|IC|post|May 16,2016|June 30,2016|\n|11|11|Driver (10)|28,500|IC|post|May 16,2016|June 30,2016|\n|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|**_Program Staff at Woreda Level_**|\n|1|Project Coordinator/M&E Officer|Project Coordinator/M&E Officer|5000.00|IC|Post|May 16.,2016|June 30.,2016|\n|2|Accountant|Accountant|4500.00|IC|Post|May 16,2016|June 30,2016|\n|3|Drivers (16)|Drivers (16)|46000|IC|Post|May 16,2016|June 30,2016|\n||**Grand Total**|**Grand Total**|**1,176,489**|||||\n\n\n124\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 138
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**B.** **Uganda**\n\n**Table 4.14. List of Consulting Assignments with Short List of International Firms**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Ref. No.**|**Description of Assignment**|**Estimated**
**Cost (US$)**|**Selection**
**Method**|**Review**
**by Bank**
**(Prior /**
**Post)**|**Expected**
**Proposals**
**Submission**
**Date**|**Expected**
**Contract Signing**
**Date**|\n|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|**Consultancy Services**|\n|1.|Baseline survey|85,000|CQS|Prior|Sep 2016|Oct 2016|\n|2|Development of management information system|50,000|CQS|Prior|Sep 2016|Oct 2016|\n|3|Independent procurement Auditor|50,000|CQS|Prior|Sep 2016|Oct 2016|\n|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|**_Technical Support Team at the Level of the Office of the Prime Minister (2 years)_**|\n|1|Project Coordinator|108,000|IC|Prior|June 2016|July 2016|\n|2|M & E Specialist|72,000|IC|Prior|June 2016|July 2016|\n|3|Rural Infrastructure Specialist|72,000|IC|Prior|June 2016|July 2016|\n|4|Procurement Specialist|72,000|IC|Prior|June 2016|July 2016|\n|5|Financial specialist|72,000|IC|Prior|June 2016|July 2016|\n|6|Environment Specialist|72,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|7|Social development specialist|72,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|8|Livelihood Specialist|72,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|9.1|Driver - 1|14,400|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|9.2|Driver - 2|14,400|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|9.3|Driver - 3|14,400|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|9.4|Driver - 4|14,400|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|**_Program Staff at District level_**|\n|1
|Engineering assistant|36,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|2
|Livelihood officer|48,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|3.1
|Driver – 1|12,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|3.2
|Driver – 2|12,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|3.3
|Driver – 3|12,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n|3.4
|Driver – 4|12,000|IC|Post|June 2016|July 2016|\n||**Grand Total**|**801,600**|||||\n\n\n125\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "List of Consulting Assignments",
+ "confidence": 0.948093831539154,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 22
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.9872012138366699,
+ "start": 8,
+ "end": 9
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Baseline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.997156023979187,
+ "start": 265,
+ "end": 267
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7924596071243286,
+ "start": 266,
+ "end": 267
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.6200546026229858,
+ "start": 277,
+ "end": 278
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management information system",
+ "confidence": 0.8541780710220337,
+ "start": 287,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Independent procurement Auditor",
+ "confidence": 0.8684802055358887,
+ "start": 308,
+ "end": 311
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 139
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**C.** **IGAD**\n\n**Table 4.15. List of Consulting Assignments with Short List of International Firms**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Ref.
No.|Description of Assignments|Estimated
Budget
$000|Selection
Method|Review by
Bank
(Prior/Post)|Expected
Proposals
Submission
Date|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Recruitment of Senior Program Coordinator|540|IC|Prior|1 May 2016||\n|2|Recruitment of Forced Displacement Expert|288|IC|Prior|1 November 2016||\n|3|Recruitment of Knowledge Management and M&E|324|IC|Prior|NA||\n|4|Recruitment of Procurement Officer|270|IC|Prior|NA||\n|5|Recruitment of Accountant|200|IC|Prior|NA||\n|6|Recruitment of Administration Assistant|114|IC|Prior|NA||\n|7|Consultancy for Strategy & Operational Plan
Development|30|IC|Post|NA||\n|8|Recruitment of Consultant for Capacity Support to
Project Countries|70|IC|Prior|NA||\n|9|Consultancy for the Commissioning of Joint Research On
Displacement & Development|100|QCBS|Prior|Dec.1.16||\n|10|Consultancy to strengthen Monitoring Mechanism on
Mixed Migration, Migration Trends and the Assessment
of the impact of intervention in the 3 Project Countries on
Forced Displacement & Mixed Migration|500|QCBS|Prior|Dec.15.16||\n||Total|2435.5|||||\n\n\n126\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "List of Consulting Assignments",
+ "confidence": 0.9135035276412964,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 22
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Description of Assignments",
+ "confidence": 0.6725126504898071,
+ "start": 39,
+ "end": 42
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.7132313251495361,
+ "start": 137,
+ "end": 138
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Recruitment of Knowledge Management and M&E",
+ "confidence": 0.527236819267273,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 171
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Forced Displacement & Mixed Migration",
+ "confidence": 0.7855072021484375,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "QCBS",
+ "confidence": 0.68548184633255,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "3 Project Countries",
+ "confidence": 0.7211316823959351,
+ "start": 340,
+ "end": 343
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 140
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "_**Environmental and Social (including safeguards)**_\n119. The DRDIP is classified as Category B for the IDA Credit supported activities as\ninterventions are not expected to lead to large scale, significant, or irreversible environmental or\nsocial impacts. The project triggers the following nine out of the ten safeguard polices:\nEnvironmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) Forests (OP/BP 4.36),\nPest Management (OP/BP 4.09), Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11), Involuntary\nResettlement (OP/BP 4.12), Indigenous Peoples/Underserved and Vulnerable peoples (OP/BP\n4.10), Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37), and International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50). With respect to\nthe IDA Regional Grant to IGAD, the Environmental Assessment Category is C since the\nactivities being supported relate to coordination, training, knowledge generation and\ndissemination which will not trigger any Safeguard Policies.\n\n\n**Social—Including Safeguards**\n\n120. Key social challenges that the participating communities might face include: (i) gender\ndisparities in access to livelihood and educational opportunities; (ii) limited access to social\nservices, especially education, health services due to the remote nature of its target communities,\nand (iii) recurring conflicts over natural resources, particularly related to water management and\nland tenure arrangements. The “service delivery” model of the project is a CDD approach which\nwill focus on local development to be promoted through empowering communities to solve their\nproblems by facilitating the process of identifying, prioritizing, implementing and monitoring\nsubproject investments by the communities to ensure inclusiveness. Social due diligence lessons\naimed at building sustainable community assets, citizen participation/engagement and gender\nmainstreaming are part of the livelihoods component.\n\n121. **Indigenous People / Underserved Peoples (OP 4.10)** . OP 4.10 is triggered only for\nEthiopia, based on the screening conducted by the World Bank and reinforced by the\nConstitution of Ethiopia, which indicate that majority of the target population identify\nthemselves as having the characteristics defined under OP 4.10. Therefore, a SA was conducted\nto complement the RPF and a Social Management Plan (SMP) prepared (details in Annex 7) and\ndisclosed in-country and at the Infoshop prior to appraisal. The SMP provides key findings of the\nsocial assessment including the process used to foster free, prior, and informed consultations and\nbroad community support, including provision of grievance-redress and benefit-sharing issues.\nAs part of the social assessment, extensive consultations have taken place with key stakeholders\nin the participating areas to seek broad community support for the project; and in accordance\nwith its CDD approach, subproject activities will be identified, prioritized, implemented and\nmonitored by beneficiary communities (including different social groups) through consultative\nprocess during implementation. The project includes cost effective and accessible grievancehandling mechanisms to ensure that any related project issues and concerns are resolved using\ndue process. Identified mitigating measures have been incorporated into the project design.\n\n122. **Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12)** . For all three countries, the project’s anticipated\nsocial impacts has triggered OP 4.12 and in line with the Association's safeguard policies, the\nproject has put in place mitigation mechanisms acceptable to the Association to mitigate these\nimpacts. For impact on potential land take and/or restrictions in access to communal natural\nresources, a RPF has been prepared and consulted upon in all three countries. These RPFs were\ndisclosed prior to appraisal in all three countries and at the World Bank Infoshop; to address any\n\n127\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 141
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "potential impacts. Given the expected small footprint of the subproject activities, any land\nacquisition will be limited, site specific and minor. The proposed project will not undertake any\nactivities that will displace people. However, it would support small-scale infrastructure that\nmight affect land holdings of individual farmers. While these interventions are yet to be\nidentified, the RPFs will guide the addressing of any issues which might arise from economic\ndisplacement and/or restriction of access to communal natural resources.\n\n\n**Environment—Including Safeguards**\n\n123. Some of the local-level investment activities under Component 1, 2 and 3 may have\nlimited adverse environmental risks and impacts. These activities could potentially include: (i)\nexpansion and improvement of service delivery which will include construction of small\ninfrastructure, (ii) construction or rehabilitation of physical structures for water catchment\nmanagement such as check-dams, water harvesting structures, etc., and (iii) land-based\nlivelihood activities which could have limited adverse environmental and social impacts.\n\n124. **Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01)** . OP 4.01 is triggered because of the following\nactivities of the project: (i) expansion and improvement of service delivery which will include\nsmall infrastructure, (ii) construction or rehabilitation of physical structures for water catchment\nmanagement such as check-dams, water harvesting structures, and (iii) land-based livelihood\nactivities which may have limited adverse environmental and social impacts. The specific sites\nfor implementing these activities are not yet known, therefore ESMFs have been prepared in all\nthe three project countries as the specific instrument for analyzing potential environmental and\nsocial risks and these were finalized and disclosed in all three countries and the Info Shop. The\nESMF would be used to develop a site-specific Environmental Management Plan prior to the\ncommencement of activities mainly under Components 1, 2, and 3. The ESMF includes standard\nmethods and procedures, along with appropriate institutional arrangements for screening and\nreviewing program activities and monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures to\nprevent adverse and cumulative impacts. The effective use of the ESMF would be regularly\nreviewed and audited.\n\n125. **Natural Habitats (OP 4.04)** . Project activities in Ethiopia and Uganda are not likely to\nencompass natural habitats. However in Djibouti, the Ali Sabieh Region is home to unique\nbiodiversity, especially the “Aire naturelle terrestre protegee d’Assamo” which is natural habitat\nto the Beira antelope. No project activities will be supported in this protected area. The project\nwill also not support any activities which are likely to indirectly affect the ecosystem critical for\nthe survival of this species. The project will screen out any activities that could have indirect or\ncumulative impacts on this habitat.\n\n126. **Forests (OP 4.36)** . Activities under Component 2 are likely to have a positive impact on\nforests with the implementation of physical and biological measures for soil and water\nconservation and afforestation. The ESMF provides detailed procedures to screen program\nactivities/subprojects for potential adverse environmental and social impacts, and to take\nmeasures to avoid, minimize and mitigate impacts on forests. Project activities in Djibouti are\nnot likely to take place in protected forest areas.\n\n127. **Pest Management (OP 4.09)** . The project will support activities under Components 2\nand 3 which are likely to be agriculture based and may increase the application of agrochemicals\n\n128\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 142
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "(insecticides, herbicides, fertilizers, etc.). Therefore, the ESMF includes a guideline for an\nIntegrated Pest Management (IPM) to address related environmental and social impacts of the\nproject.\n\n128. **Physical Cultural Resources (OP 4.11)** . The project sites and their potential cultural and\nhistorical significance are not known. The ESMF includes provisions and a set of procedures to\nscreen project activities for such impacts and to deal with chance finds.\n\n129. **Safety of Dams (OP 4.37):** Component 2 may support small dam constructions (less\nthan 4.5 meters) as part of small and micro scale irrigation schemes. The Project will use the\nFAO ‘Manual on Small Earth Dams, A Guide to Siting, Design and Construction” (FAO 2010)\nor comparable text in French.\n\n130. **Projects on International Waterways (OP 7.50):** The project will finance small-scale\nirrigation investments but these are not likely to be located in international waterways basins in\nDjibouti. In Ethiopia, the project is located in international water basins such as Baro-Akobo,\nGenale Dawa, Tekeze and Abbay rivers. In Uganda, the project is located in the international\nwater basin on the Nile River. While the impact of small-scale irrigation on these rivers would be\ninsignificant and the cumulative abstraction is expected to be minor, Riparian countries have\nbeen notified in accordance with the policy.\n\n131. **Climate Change Screening** : This was undertaken for Ethiopia under the proposed\nproject also covering Uganda and Djibouti. This is because (i) the bulk of the project investments\nwill be in Ethiopia, and (ii) there is a similarity in weather and climate conditions in the sites\nselected for interventions in three project countries. The project targeted areas are exposed to\nhigh temperatures, droughts and/or floods due to intense rainfall during the main rainy season\nwhich spans from July to October. Overall, the proposed Project will contribute to reducing\ngreenhouse gas emissions through Component 2 - Sustainable Environmental Management by\nsupporting (i) measures on improved energy efficiency in cooking and lighting, and increasing\nthe use of renewable energy sources reducing pressure on biomass; and (ii) soil and water\nconservation measures, afforestation and area closures for regeneration that will contribute to\nreducing the impacts of climate trends by improving water conservation, increased biomass and\nfodder availability. However, it is worth nothing that that project supported activities under\nComponent 1 – Social and Economic Services and Infrastructure such roads are likely to be\naffected by climate trends. Also, investments under Component 3 – Livelihoods Program which\nwill support Agriculture and Livestock related livelihoods are likely to be impacted by climate\ntrends.\n\n132. **Consultations on safeguard documents** : The host community members in the\nparticipating areas were consulted in all three countries during project preparation to seek their\nbuy in and will further be consulted during implementation. In Ethiopia, the implementing\nministry - Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, and its respective counterparts in the\nparticipating regions, zones and woredas and kebele administrative levels, were also consulted\non the World Bank’s safeguard guidelines, and the Ethiopia Environmental Impact Assessment\nproclamation. The applicable screening documents—will be made available for public review at\na place accessible to local people (e.g. at a local government office (i.e. kebele council, Woreda\n\n\n129\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 143
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "Offices and regional bureaus, at the Environment Protection Agency), and in a form, manner,\nand language they can understand.\n\n133. In Djibouti, the implementing agency, ADDS, held consultations with the relevant\ncommunities in the two regions where the project activities will be implemented, government\nagencies and Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs). The documents will be disclosed in\nconformity with national requirements.\n\n134. In Uganda, consultations were held with the Office of the Prime Minister – the\nimplementing agency, UNHCR, Uganda Red Cross Society, Lutheran World Federation, InterAid Uganda, Action Africa Help International, National Environment Management Authority,\nNational Forestry Authority, Ministry of Gender Labour and Social Development; and the\ndistrict and sub county administrative level as well as the communities. All applicable safeguard\ninstruments have been made available at accessible places in the appropriate form, manner and\nlanguage in Uganda as well.\n\n135. **Safeguard Management Capacity:** In Ethiopia, the project has conducted a\ncomprehensive SA and extensive stakeholder consultations with project affected persons to\nsecure broad community support; developed a grievance-redress system; and a culturally\nappropriate benefit-sharing mechanism anchored on a CDD service model. However, the\nrecipient’s capacity to identify and assess potential adverse environmental and social impacts and\nto implement and monitor appropriate mitigation measures is weak across all the three countries.\n\n136. In Djibouti and Uganda, the safeguard risks are associated with the Client’s capacity to\nimplement the requisite mitigation actions. The implementing agency will recruit a qualified\nenvironmental and social specialist, before the project becomes effective, to address the\nenvironmental and social safeguard matters. For Djibouti, special attention will be required to\nensure that activities in the Ali Sabieh region do not have negative impacts on the protected area\nin Assamo.\n\n137. Across all three countries, the recipient will recruit/designate qualified and experienced\nsocial and environmental specialist responsible for social and environmental safeguard matters at\nthe national and regional/district/subnational level and they will receive training on World Bank\nsafeguard policies. The World Bank will support measures that will strengthen the Recipient's\ncapacity to implement safeguard instruments prepared for this project, through training and\ncapacity support activities. Further, the project's operational manuals, and the planning process\nwill be conducted in culturally and gender sensitive manner.\n\n138. **Disclosure of safeguard documents** . All of the Recipients’ assessments (ESMFs, RPFs,\nand the SA) have been prepared, consulted upon and finalized. The safeguard documents have\nbeen disclosed in-country and at the World Bank Info Shop prior to appraisal. The project is well\nplaced to comply with all relevant World Bank safeguard and national policies, and has met the\nrequirements of the World Bank’s Disclosure Policy.\n\n\n_**Monitoring and Evaluation**_\n139. The DRDIP will be implemented at the community level with necessary oversight and\ntechnical support at the national, subnational, and local levels. M&E capacities will be ensured at\nthe national, subnational, and local levels for the collection, organizing, and analysis of project\n\n130\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 144
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "related data. The main instrument for M&E under the DRDIP will be the Results Framework\n(Annex 1). The indicators are the same for Djibouti, Ethiopia and Uganda with their respective\nbaseline, intermediate and end of project targets; and will be the basis for reporting progress.\nThe indicators, data sources and data collection methods take into account the CDD approach,\nand the limited institutional capacities in the project targeted areas. All indicators are\ndisaggregated by country, with further disaggregation by gender (percent female) for the core\nindicator on direct project beneficiaries.\n\n\n140. The project will design a management information system for monitoring inputs, outputs\nand processes; evaluation of outcome and impacts; environmental and social safeguard\nmonitoring; and participatory monitoring and evaluation and internal learning. M&E activities\nwill also include regular monitoring of implementation progress/performance, independent\nprocess monitoring (including inter alia regular assessments of community level planning and\nreview of the effectiveness and quality of capacity support efforts), outcome/impact evaluations\nat baseline, mid-term and end of project, and annual thematic studies. The project’s Results\nFramework will be used as a basis for reporting progress against indicators, including progress\ntoward achieving the PDO and implementation progress. The project will consider the use of\nmobile technologies to increase the reach and frequency of data capturing at local level and\naggregating in a platform that could serve as a dashboard; such a tool would provide near realtime monitoring and ability to visualize and/or geo-localize activities supported by the project in\nthe three countries.\n\n\n_Role of Partners (if applicable)_\n141. The proposed operation has been an ongoing collaboration between UNHCR and World\nBank. UNHCR Uganda is providing financial and technical support to the OPM to support the\nGovernment of Uganda’s preparation efforts. It is also providing inputs at the various\npreparatory workshops the World Bank teams and their respective government counterparts have\norganized to prepare the project. During the implementation phase, UNHCR will closely work\nwith the respective government bodies at the national and local levels to support the\nimplementation of the project and enhance synergies between the operations of the two\norganizations.\n\n\n131\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.5111744403839111,
+ "start": 24,
+ "end": 25
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Djibouti",
+ "confidence": 0.5763112902641296,
+ "start": 29,
+ "end": 30
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.504883348941803,
+ "start": 103,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management information system",
+ "confidence": 0.7991353869438171,
+ "start": 114,
+ "end": 117
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring inputs, outputs\nand processes",
+ "confidence": 0.8722225427627563,
+ "start": 118,
+ "end": 124
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual thematic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.8944320678710938,
+ "start": 201,
+ "end": 204
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "reporting progress against indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.8085391521453857,
+ "start": 218,
+ "end": 222
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "OPM",
+ "confidence": 0.5044633150100708,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.6578146815299988,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 145
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 5: Implementation Support Plan**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n**Strategy and Approach for Implementation Support**\n1. The strategy for supporting project implementation will focus on successfully mitigating\nthe risks identified at various levels and supporting the risk management proposed in the\n_Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool_ (SORT); it will consist of: (i) implementation support\nmissions and (ii) technical assistance in areas of weaknesses and where innovations are\nintroduced.\n\n\n**Implementation Support Plan**\n\n\n2. Arrangements made at preparation phase will be maintained during implementation\nsupport involving a regional Task Team Leader (TTL) and Djibouti co-TTL based in\nWashington and Ethiopia and Uganda co-TTLs based in-country. This arrangement will enhance\ninteraction with the participating countries and improve monitoring of progress. The Association\nis also seeking possible Trust Fund budget to strengthen supervision activities on top of the\nAssociation’s budget.\n\n3. The IS plan will comprise a number of critical review instruments to assess progress\ntoward achieving the PDO and overall implementation progress and to effectively respond to\nissues and challenges as they arise. Such reviews will include among others: (i) Implementation\nsupport missions conducted semi-annually; (ii) a mid-term review (MTR) that will include a\ncomprehensive assessment of the progress achieved at the mid-point of project implementation\nand will serve as a platform for revisiting project design issues and where adjustments might be\nneeded; (iii) impact assessment; and (iv) implementation completion where an independent\nassessment of the project will be undertaken and lessons drawn to inform future or similar\noperations.\n\n4. The Implementation Support missions will specifically focus on reviewing the quality of\nimplementation, finding solutions to implementation problems, assessing the likelihood of\nachieving the PDO, review with the PCUs the action plan and disbursement programs for the\nnext six months; review the project’s fiduciary aspects, including disbursement and procurement;\nverify compliance of project activities with the Association’s environmental and social safeguard\npolicies; and review the results against the Results Framework. The missions would combine\nsome field visits, and multistakeholder discussions.\n\n5. At the technical level, the Association team will assemble the appropriate technical skills\nand experience needed to support implementation of this regional operation (table 5.1). Fiduciary\nreviews will be conducted by the Association’s financial management and procurement\nspecialists to ensure that fiduciary systems and capacities remain adequate during the course of\nproject implementation in accordance with the Association’s fiduciary requirements.\n\ni. _Financial management._ The Association will require quarterly interim financial reports\n\nbe submitted to the Association as well as the annual external audit report for review. The\nAssociation will also review other project-related information such as the internal control\nsystems’ report. Annual onsite visits will also be carried out by the Association to review\n\n132\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "critical review instruments",
+ "confidence": 0.5796771049499512,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "mid-term review",
+ "confidence": 0.919719398021698,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 235
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "MTR",
+ "confidence": 0.7583097815513611,
+ "start": 236,
+ "end": 237
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly interim financial reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9619304537773132,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 487
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual external audit report",
+ "confidence": 0.9486078023910522,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5375939011573792,
+ "start": 499,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal control\nsystems’ report",
+ "confidence": 0.8193705081939697,
+ "start": 514,
+ "end": 519
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5109397768974304,
+ "start": 518,
+ "end": 519
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 146
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "the financial management system including internal controls. Monitoring of actions taken\non issues highlighted in audit reports, auditors’ management letters, internal audit and\nother reports will be reviewed by the Association, including transaction reviews, as\nneeded. Financial management training to PCU staff be carried out by effectiveness.\nAdditional financial management training will be conducted during project\nimplementation as needed.\n\nii. _Procurement._ The Association will undertake implementation support missions every six\n\nmonths.\n\niii. _Safeguards._ The Association’s safeguard team will consist of social and environmental\n\nspecialists who will guide the project team in applying the agreed safeguard instruments\nas well as reviewing compliance during implementation support missions.\n\n\n\n**Table 5.1. Implementation Team Composition**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Time|Focus|Skills Needed|\n|---|---|---|\n|First 12
months| Project implementation start up
Establishment of the PCUs at national,
subnational and local levels
Support to implementation activities:
sensitization, community consultations and
planning, institution building, and
strengthening of implementation capacity,
including monitoring and evaluation (M&E)
Guidance on applying safeguard
instruments
Development of impact evaluation
methodology and oversight of baseline
survey
Training of staff at all levels on
procurement, financial management, M&E,
and safeguards
| TTL
Co TTL, Agriculture and NRM
Co TTL, Social and Economic
infrastructure
Co TTL, Fragility and Conflict
Livestock
Energy
On farm Livelihoods
Off-farm Likelihoods
Social Development
Financial management
Procurement
M&E
Environment|\n|12-48
months| IS missions conducted to monitor
implementation performance including
progress against targets of the Results
Framework
Review of community-driven development
processes and livelihoods
Review of annual work plans and
disbursement schedule
Review quality of quarterly/annual reports
Review of audit reports and interim
financial report
Review adequacy of the financial
management system and compliance
MTR undertaken (during year 3)
|Same as above|\n|49-60
months| IS missions conducted to monitor
implementation performance including
progress against Results Framework
targets
Review of community-driven development|Same as above|\n\n\n133\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management system",
+ "confidence": 0.699079692363739,
+ "start": 1,
+ "end": 4
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.922221302986145,
+ "start": 265,
+ "end": 266
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "methodology and oversight of baseline",
+ "confidence": 0.5824965238571167,
+ "start": 257,
+ "end": 262
+ },
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7091277241706848,
+ "start": 265,
+ "end": 266
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly/annual reports",
+ "confidence": 0.933793306350708,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "year 3",
+ "confidence": 0.5405488610267639,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 147
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Skills Mix**\n\n\n6. Table 5.2 summarizes the proposed skill mix and number of staff weeks during project\nimplementation. It is anticipated that this will change over time as demand increases.\n\n\n**Table 5.2. Team Skills Mix and Time**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Skills Needed|Number of Staff
Weeks|Number of
Trips|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|TTL|15|3|Washington based|\n|Co TTL, Agriculture and Natural
Resource Management|8|-|Country-office based|\n|Co TTL, Social and Economic
Infrastructure|8|-|Country-office based|\n|Co TTL Fragility and Conflict|8|2|Washington based|\n|Livestock|4|-|Country office based|\n|Energy|4|2|Washington based|\n|On farm Livelihoods|4|2|India based|\n|Off-farm Likelihoods|8|2|India based|\n|Social Development (3)|3|-|Country office based|\n|Environment (3)|2|-|Country office based|\n|Financial management (3)|4|-|Country office based|\n|Procurement (3)|4|-|Country office based|\n|Monitoring and evaluation|4|2|Country office based|\n\n\n134\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 148
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 6: Economic and Financial Analysis**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The economic and financial analysis conducted as part of project preparation for the\nDRDIP suggests that the proposed interventions are economically and financially feasible. As\nCDD project, it is not possible to pre-determine actual investments. Therefore, analyses were\ncarried out based on a typology of DRDIP investments that are expected to be common across\nthe three participating countries of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda. The analysis employs a cost-benefit methodology, which is perceived as a more appropriate approach for such a task [44] .\nParticularly, it is a simplified cost-benefit analysis, where solely direct cost and monetary value\nof selected benefits are compared, when possible, and economic internal rate of returns are\npresented. In fact, the proposed interventions have several indirect benefits that are not\nquantifiable in monetary terms. For this reason, they cannot be accounted for, both in net present\nvalue calculations and in the sensitivity analysis. Nonetheless, they certainly can be listed among\nthe projects’ top benefits. A list of indirect, intangible benefits is presented for such\ninterventions.\n\n2. The communities being analyzed are located in remote areas and face extreme poverty.\nThey are poorly endowed with natural resources, have limited arable land, and are generally\naffected by scarce rainfall and no permanent sources of water. The main hypothesis is that\nappropriate design and implementation of various investments would significantly diminish the\ncosts of addressing basic needs and essential services of host communities. The areas identified\nas critical to host communities’ self-reliance and sustainability are grouped in 3 components that\nare meant to be implemented modularly based on local administrations’ capacity, planning, and\npriorities. A positive externality may be that appropriate, basic investments in the above three\nareas would significantly contribute to the creation of an effective labor market, which in turn\nwould lead to building self-reliant communities. In all 8 interventions have been analyzed (table\n6.1): 6 relate to the 3 components and the 7 [th] is cross-cutting intervention.\n\n\n**Table 6.1. Project’s Components and Areas of Intervention**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Development Area|Proposed Intervention|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1**|Social and Economic Services
and Infrastructure|1. Construction of one borehole water well
2. Construction of health facility
3. Construction of school building
4. Construction of road for access to markets|\n|**Component 2**|Sustainable Environmental
Management|5. Implementation of solar panel technology|\n|**Component 3**|Livelihoods Program|6. Implementation of agropastoral and fisheries
development project|\n|**N/A**|Access to Finance|7. Implementation of money transfer system|\n\n\n44 Bugnion, C. 1998. “Economic Rationalization of Humanitarian Aid: Use of Cost and Effectiveness Indicators to Evaluate ECHO Funded\n\nHumanitarian Emergencies.” European Community Humanitarian Office.\n\n135\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 149
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Proposed Interventions for Component 1**\n_Project 1: Ensuring access to water (US$9,750)_\n3. The shortage of potable water negatively affects sanitation and increases the morbidity\nassociated with oro-fecal contamination (WHO 2006). This analysis focuses on a borehole as a\nwater source, which, according to existing analyses, can address the needs of an average number\nof 365 individuals. Access to water is considered free of charge. Benefits and challenges of\nborehole water source are presented in table 6.2.\n\n\n\n**Table 6.2. Benefits and Challenges of Borehole Water Source**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**
|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Time savings** particularly for women45.
Time saved can be used for children's
welfare and up-bringing, gaining new
skills, training or participation in
associations.
**Reduction in morbidity and mortality**
with reduction in prevalence of
waterborne diseases, at least by 25
percent by improving access to drinking
water (i) reducing diarrheal incidence
rate by 10-40 percent, (ii) reduced
mortality rates, with reduced incidence
of diarrhea.
**Reduction of conflicts** and tensions
over scarce availability of water
**Strengthening social cohesion**|**Conflict** over water
point management
**Injuries** or
fatalities during
building|**Reduced costs** of
treatment for poor
quality water related
illnesses
**Reduction of**
**greenhouse emissions**
with compensatory
reforestation around
water points. This will
create a carbon sink to
soak up carbon dioxide,
which in turn would
help reduce greenhouse
gas emissions.
|**The accelerated**
**decline** of
groundwater levels,
resulting from climate
change and excessive
use of groundwater
resources
**Water and soil**
**pollution**during work|\n\n\n\n_Project 2: Construction of one health facility (US$388,330)_\n4. Hospitals are perceived as vital and necessary resources that ensure self-reliance and\nbenefits to a community [46] . The health staff-to-population ratio in the three countries is, on\naverage, 0.12 doctors for 1,000 people, below Sub-Saharan Africa developing countries\naverage—0.2 per 1,000—and an average 0.8 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people, versus a\nSub-Saharan Africa developing countries average of 1.12 per 1,000. All these figures are below\nWHO standards. [47] The insufficient health infrastructure, combined with diminishing public\nspending as well as a growing number of migrants, results in a high and rising incidence of\ntuberculosis, malaria, cholera and AIDS (WHO 2006). There are benefits and challenges in\nbuilding a health center (table 6.3).\n\n\n45 Study in Nigeria – “GDN, 2013, Cost-Effectiveness and Benefit-Costs Analysis of Some Water Interventions” revealed that a typical eightmember household spends about 14 hours per day fetching water from traditional sources such as wells and rivers (5,110 hours per year). The\ninstallation of a borehole or pipeline water system reduces this time an average of 18 minutes to fetch 20 liters of water from boreholes and zero\n(0) time to get piped-water.\n46 Shepherd, D. S., D. Hodgkin, and Y. E. Anthony. 2000. 1998. “Analysis of Hospital Costs: A Manual for Managers.” World Health\n[Organization, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42197/1/9241545283.pdf.](http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42197/1/9241545283.pdf)\n47 WDI based on World Health Organization data (2015).\n\n136\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 150
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 6.3. Benefits and Challenges of Building a Health Center**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Reduction** of maternal mortality
**Protection** of children
**Increase** immunization through
vaccination
**Improved** fight against HIV/AIDS
as well as treatment of infected
individuals
**Increased** access to health service|**Poor quality** of
service, shortage of
qualified nurses,
midwives and allied
health professionals|**Diminishing overall**
**budget burden** as the
result of increased
immunization and
reduction of severe
illness|**Increasing costs** of
running facility center
**Shortage of qualified**
nurses, midwives and
allied health
professionals
|\n\n\n\n_Project 3: Building a community school (US$195,484)_\n5. A Community School can serve multiple purposes of being a school and a meeting and\nlearning space for the community (table 6.4). It will be characterized by a significant\nparticipation of the local community, which would contribute to creation, construction,\nfinancing, and management.\n\n\n\n**Table 6.4. Benefits and Challenges of Building One School**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Improved access to**education
**Higher attendance of**students
and teachers lead to improving
learning outcomes and building
solid social capital
**Poverty reduction.**Access to
education increase the chances
of higher earnings in the future
and thus reduce the poverty48.
**Parental education** positively
affects the child’s educational
level, achievement and health49.
**Increase life expectancy** and
reduce mortality rate
**Boosts technological change**
by diffusion of knowledge|**The limited capacity**
of the school may
increase competition
and exclusion.
**Increasing social**
tensions in case of
excessive demand
|**Reduction of financial**
**burden**through
efficient access to
education for such
groups as girls, rural
communities, ethnic
minorities, migrants is
improved
**High-cost efficiency**
with community
involvement
Poverty reduction
Education reduces
criminal activity
|**The risk of increased**
**budget burden**in case
when school does not
secure funding for long
term running
**High risk of inefficient**
allocation and spending of
funds
**Weak salary incentives**
may lead to high rate of
teacher absenteeism
**Poor fiduciary control**
may increase the risk of
corruption|\n\n\n\n_Project 4: Construction of a 100 Km Paved Road (US$3,416,980)_\n6. Public services and infrastructure are inseparable facets of economic and human\ndevelopment (Robinson 1999). Paved roads play an important role in promoting trade,\nfacilitating access to markets, and creating an enabling environment for business and\n\n\n48\nJimenez, E., and H. A. Patrinos 2008. “Can Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide Education Policy in Developing\nCountries?” Policy Research Working Paper 4568, World Bank, Washington, D.C.\n\n\n49 Wolfe, B., and S. Zuvekas. 1997. “Non-Market Effects of Education.” _International Journal of Education Research_ 27(6): 491–502.\n\n137\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 151
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "investments [50] (table 6.5.). A standardized unit to measure the cost of building a paved road was\narrived at (table 6.6) building on an existing World Bank study [51] that measures cost per km of\npaved road (categorized in less and more than 50 Km due to a scale effect: Roads longer than 50\nKm have a cheaper cost per road unit) and is useful as it allows planning under various\ncircumstances in Sub-Sahara Africa.\n\n\n**Table 6.5. Cost of Unit Road Construction (2015)**\n\n|Type|Unit|Median Cost|\n|---|---|---|\n|Construction of paved road <50km|US$/lanekm|472,207|\n|Construction of paved road >50km|US$/lanekm|341,698|\n\n\n\n_Note:_ US$ values adjusted for inflation wrt 2006 US$ as used in the reference.\n\n_Source:_ Africon 2008.\n\n\n**Table 6.6. Benefits and Challenges of New Paved Road Construction Project**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Transportation of commodities**to
and from the project areas, and
access to markets (this is a large
positive impact)
**Better access to** community facilities
and services such as health centers,
schools, and places of worship,
amongst others
**Creation of job** opportunities to the
local unskilled and skilled people in
the community
**Provision of markets** for locally
available resources needed for road
construction such as stones and
related products (i.e. sand, gravel,
etc.)
**Boost tourism potential** in the
region through improved access to
tourist destinations
**Reduced road accidents** as opposed
to cases of unpaved, rugged roads
(many potholes with pools of water),
dust, ditches, etc.
**Improved road drainage**
infrastructure and general discharge
of storm water from the
road/carriageway|**Faster spreading of**
**infections** and other
diseases due to easier,
increased movement of
people
**Increase in pollution** due
to increased traffic of
vehicles
**Vegetation clearances**
would exacerbate depletion
of trees and vegetation
**Disruption to Wildlife**
Movements
**Soil Erosion Concerns**
due to invasive activity
affecting the ground
**Resettlement and**
**property damage**of
households living in close
proximity of or on the area
of the new road
**Discharge of Storm**
**Water (drainage)** can be
potentially dangerous if not
properly managed
(directed)|**Less dust**in the air
from rugged,
unpaved roads
**Increased**
**presence of**
**government** due to
improved regional
and inter-
community
connections
**Cost-effective**
ability to manage
the territory with
fewer resources|**Increased cost** to enable
a safe environment and
fight crime, smuggling,
and other criminal
activities due to faster,
easier lines of
communications (that is,
paved roads)
**Increased prevention**
**activity in terms of**
costs and resources to
counter and contain
potential faster disease
epidemics among
communities|\n\n\n\n50 “Road Sector Support Project 3: Nyakahita-Ibanda-Kamwenge Road Upgrading Project” Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study.\n[http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Environmental-and-Social-](http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Environmental-and-Social-Assessments/Uganda%20RSSP3%20%20Nyakahita_Ibanda_Kamwenge%20Road%20Draft%20ESIA%20-%20RAP%20Summary%20_PIC_-1.pdf)\n[Assessments/Uganda%20RSSP3%20%20Nyakahita_Ibanda_Kamwenge%20Road%20Draft%20ESIA%20-%20RAP%20Summary%20_PIC_-](http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Environmental-and-Social-Assessments/Uganda%20RSSP3%20%20Nyakahita_Ibanda_Kamwenge%20Road%20Draft%20ESIA%20-%20RAP%20Summary%20_PIC_-1.pdf)\n[1.pdf.](http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Environmental-and-Social-Assessments/Uganda%20RSSP3%20%20Nyakahita_Ibanda_Kamwenge%20Road%20Draft%20ESIA%20-%20RAP%20Summary%20_PIC_-1.pdf)\n[51 Unit Costs of Infrastructure Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Summary of Background Paper 11 (June), Africon. http://www.eu-africa-](http://www.eu-africa-infrastructure-tf.net/attachments/library/aicd-background-paper-11-unit-costs-summary-en.pdf)\n[infrastructure-tf.net/attachments/library/aicd-background-paper-11-unit-costs-summary-en.pdf.](http://www.eu-africa-infrastructure-tf.net/attachments/library/aicd-background-paper-11-unit-costs-summary-en.pdf)\n\n138\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "World Bank study",
+ "confidence": 0.9786699414253235,
+ "start": 37,
+ "end": 40
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.8289520144462585,
+ "start": 37,
+ "end": 39
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Sub-Sahara Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9905585050582886,
+ "start": 90,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5277472734451294,
+ "start": 106,
+ "end": 107
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "of paved road >50km",
+ "confidence": 0.5368445515632629,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Africon",
+ "confidence": 0.8417565226554871,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 188
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2008",
+ "confidence": 0.973825991153717,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2006",
+ "confidence": 0.8185857534408569,
+ "start": 175,
+ "end": 176
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Host and Refugee Population",
+ "confidence": 0.9151307940483093,
+ "start": 209,
+ "end": 213
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study",
+ "confidence": 0.6113878488540649,
+ "start": 923,
+ "end": 929
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Uganda",
+ "confidence": 0.6063746809959412,
+ "start": 935,
+ "end": 936
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Unit Costs of Infrastructure Projects",
+ "confidence": 0.7100679874420166,
+ "start": 971,
+ "end": 976
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Africon",
+ "confidence": 0.6047582626342773,
+ "start": 990,
+ "end": 991
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Sub-Saharan Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8554213047027588,
+ "start": 977,
+ "end": 979
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 152
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Proposed Interventions for Component 2**\n_Project 5: Implementation of solar panel power (US$822 per solar photovoltaic (PV) system_ _[52]_ _)_\n\n\n7. A 2015 McKinsey study [53] found that if Sub-Saharan Africa aggressively promotes\nrenewables, it could obtain a 27 percent reduction in CO2 emissions and that by 2030 solar\nwould be the cheapest or second-cheapest domestic energy source in more than half of SubSaharan African countries. According to UNDP [54] and NEPAD, [55] Sub-Saharan Africa\ngovernments should tap this free and clean energy source to light up remote and isolated homes\nthat have no immediate hope of linking to their national electricity grid, also due to high costs\nand impracticalities such tasks would entail. Solar power provides families with much more\nefficient means to cook their food and light their homes than kerosene or even worse wood from\ntrees. Moreover, kerosene and wood have a highly negative impact on the environment both in\nterms of pollution, CO2 emission, and land degradation (cutting of trees would lead to depletion\nof entire forests in the long run, which in turn would make CO2 emission even worse). In\naddition, solar power is free, clean, and ensures sustainability (table 6.7). A solar panel can\ngenerate enough power to run a stove, pump water, light the house, and power a television for a\nday, [56] or alternatively to light three to six rooms and power a black-and-white TV each night,\naccording to the Energy and Environment Group at UNDP.\n\n\n\n**Table 6.7. Benefits and Challenges of Introducing Solar Panel Power**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Improved quality life**
**Access to a free,** clean, off-grid, and
sustainable energy source
**Freedom from kerosene lamps**
which are more expensive and
polluting (UNDP GEF Study)
**More efficiently** cooking food and
lighting homes, with no need to cut
trees and pollute/smoke the house
**Extended study hours** for
schoolchildren
**Upgraded health standards** by
electrifying a local health center
(light, refrigerators, electric
equipment, etc.)
**More efficient and more productive**
**enterprises** that could keep working
into the night to meet customers’
orders and increase production|**Maintenance and**
**fixing**
(troubleshooting)
issues may be
difficult/expensive
**Poor operation and**
**maintenance**may
make people resort to
wood burning - this
would be a waste of
investments and an
environmental
negative impact|**27 percent reduction in**
**CO2 emissions -**
McKinsey
get rid of kerosene lamps
(pollution) or wood (trees
depletion)
**Substantial Savings** due
to no need to electrify
rural, remote, and
scattered areas
**Reduced rural-to-urban**
**migration**with extended
study hours for
schoolchildren
**Upgraded health**
**standards**by electrifying
a local health center
(light, refrigerators,
electric equipment, etc.)|**Risk of resorting to**
**tree depletion in**
**case**of technical
issues –
environmental risk.|\n\n\n\n52 UNDP Global Environment Facility (GEF) improved the quality of life for the community. They have extended study hours for school children,\nreduced rural-to-urban migration in the area, and upgraded health standards by electrifying a local health center.\n53 “Brighter Africa: The Growth Potential of the Sub-Saharan Electricity Sector.” February, McKinsey\n[54 2006. “Solar Power: Cheap Energy Source for Africa.” October. http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/october-2006/solar-power-cheap-](http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/october-2006/solar-power-cheap-energy-source-africa)\n[energy-source-africa](http://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/october-2006/solar-power-cheap-energy-source-africa)\n55 The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) is an economic development program of the African Union that aims to provide an\noverarching vision and policy framework for accelerating economic cooperation and integration among African countries.\n56 Mr. Garai Makokoro, Director of the Energy Technology Institute of Zimbabwe.\n\n139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 153
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Proposed Interventions for Component 3**\n\n\nProject 6: Livelihood: Agropastoral and fisheries development projects (US$4,408,000)\n8. Agropastoral development in the host communities would increase food supply and\nprovide employment opportunities. In Djibouti only, taking into account Obock’s geographical\nlocation on the coastline, agropastoral development should be complemented with a fishery\ndevelopment initiative. The benefits and challenges of both projects are presented in table 6.8.\nThe total cost of both projects for Obock region equals US$4,408,000.\n\n\n\n**Table 6.8. Benefits and Challenges of Agropastoral and Fisheries Projects**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Displaced and Local Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Increasing supply** of fish and
agricultural products
**Promoting and implementing**
shade gardens
increasing knowledge transfer
**Income**from production output
sales
**Creation of new job** places|**Decreasing prices**
through increased
supply may negatively
hit the projected
revenues|**Improving coastal**
**infrastructure**
**Promoting fish-related**
**income**-generating activities
for women
**Improving water**
**management** and irrigation in
order to increase resilience
against droughts and floods|**Increasing number**
**of economic**
**migrants**|\n\n\n\n**Capital**\n\n\n_Project 7: Improving access to financial services (US$318,525)_\n9. The role of financial capital in building an independent economy, stimulating business\nand increasing human well-being is undisputed. Access to finance is difficult in each of the three\ncountries’ remote areas with migrants. Merely 12 percent of people has access to banking\nservices and just a very small number of SMEs has access to bank financing, which receive just 5\npercent of capital allocated to enterprises, while start-ups or early-stage ventures are _de facto_\nexcluded from any assistance (GIIN 2015). An effective solution for addressing the issue of\naccess to capital in poor African countries seems to be the implementation of mobile financial\nservices, which require mobile phones to transfer money, obtain micro insurance, open savings\naccount and apply for and receive some credit. It is estimated that the median cost of mobile\nfinancial services to a user is 3 times lower than traditional banking services and money transfer\nservices which are generally used to transfer money is Sub-Saharan Africa (GSMA 2014 [57] ).\nCosts for addressing the issue of low presence of both internet and mobile phones in those areas\nare estimated as approximately US$318,525. [58] Such an initiative, however, needs to be\nassociated with appropriate regulation, business model, a sufficient distribution network and\nappropriate consumer education. Table 6.9 present benefits and challenges of increasing access\nto capital through low cost mobile financial services [59] .\n\n\n**Table 6.9. Benefits and Challenges of Improved Financial Services**\n\n57 “State of the Industry. Mobile Financial Services for the Unbanked.” GSMA. http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03/SOTIR_2014.pdf\n58 The estimate is based on the cost of start-up service in Ethiopia adjusted to the average size of three countries. See: African Business Magazine,\n2013.\n59 The Boston Consulting Group. 2011. “The Socio-Economic Impact of Mobile Financial Services.” BCG, Boston\n\n140\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 154
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Increasing domestic savings**
of poor and rural populations,
which increase their
resilience to economic shocks
(it is estimated that one time
natural disaster may hit 30
percent of the average annual
household income).
**Boosting money transfers**
from better situated family
members to migrants and
poor locals and which may
lead to reduction of
inequalities (up to 5 percent
over 5 years).
**Decreasing amount of time**
necessary to access from rural
areas to traditional bank
office, which is usually
located in town (savings up to
12 days´ worth of wages
annually).
**Diminishing the rate of**
**children out of school** in
response to financial shock
(up to 7 percent);
Improved gender equality
through bringing banking to
home.|**Increasing inflation**
through higher demand
on goods.
|**Lowering the cost of doing**
**business benefits**SMEs and
boosts private
entrepreneurship, which leads
to job creation: According to
World Bank study, an increase
of 1 percent in financial
inclusion corresponds to a 0.51
percent increase in business
creation; and a 15 percent
inclusion increase leads to
employment growth of 1
percent.
**Increasing government**
**revenues** as a result of higher
corporate revenues generated
as the result of better access to
capital (up to 3 percent).
**Increase gross domestic**
**product of**up to 5 percent
over five years.
**Increasing transparency** of
financial transaction through
diminishing cash flow and
eliminating the “middle-man”-
level.|**The risk of granting**
**access to finance for**
terrorist and criminals.
**The risk of increasing**
**inflation through**
higher demand on
goods.
|\n\n\n\n**Net Present Values of Proposed Interventions Over a Five-Year Period (US$)**\n\n\n10. The cost and monetary value of selected benefits, the cumulative value of benefits as well\nas net present value of selected development projects are presented in table 6.10. Because of the\nhighly controversial monetary value of human life, as well as deferred benefits of school\ngraduates, the analysis of five years benefits excluded the benefits from building a hospital and\nschool. Moreover, given the high number of indirect benefits, which cannot be quantifiable in\nmonetary terms, the net present value and subsequent sensitivity analysis does not include the\npaved roads and solar panel systems projects.\n\n\n**Table 6.10. Net Present Values of Proposed Interventions - social discount rate used: 2.6 percent**\n\n**(equal to inflation rate as of March 2015)**\n\n141\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 155
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|Col2|Present Value of Benefits from First to Fifth Year (US$)|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Developme**
**nt Project**|**Investme**
**nt (US$)**|**1 **|**2 **|**3 **|**4 **|**5 **|**Estimated**
**Cumulative**
**value of**
**benefits**
**(US$)**|**Net Present**
**Value (US$)**|\n|Borehole
water|9,750|18,246|17,784|17,333|16,894|16,466|86,724|76,974|\n|Agropastor
al and
Fishery|4,408,000|3,110,526|3,031,702|2,954,875|2,879,995|2,807,013|10,376,112|10,376,112|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations based on Cost Benefit Analysis simulations and estimated net present value of monetized benefits.\n\n\n**Sensitivity Analysis**\n11. A sensitivity analysis has been conducted to assess the effect on the internal rate of return\nof variations in benefits and costs in the realization of benefits, limited to projects where benefits\ncould be expressed in monetary terms. Notwithstanding an increase in cost by 10 percent or a\ndecrease in the total estimated benefits by 10 percent, the results appear to remain robust.\nMoreover, a third scenario that contemplates a 10 percent increase in costs combined with a 10\npercent decrease in benefits still shows robust internal rate of return (table 6.11), considering a\nvery conservative social discount rate of 2.6 percent. In conclusion, the overall net discounted\nbenefits of the presented conservative cost-benefit analysis remain positive under any\ncircumstances.\n\n\n**Table 6.11. Sensitivity Analysis: Internal Rate of Return (Social discount rate used: 2.6 percent)**\n\n|Col1|Borehole water (%)|Agropastoral and Fishery
(%)|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Base Scenario**|184|63|\n|**Cost +10%OR Benefit -10%**|166|55|\n|**Cost +10%AND Benefit -10%**
|151
|49
|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Team’s calculations based on Cost Benefit Analysis simulations and estimated net present value of monetized benefits.\n\n\n142\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 156
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 7: Social Management Plan for Ethiopia**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The safeguard risk for the DRDIP has been rated as **Substantial** and the project is\nassigned Environmental Category B, predicated on the fact that environmental risks and social\nimpacts may be minimal, manageable and, in most cases, reversible. However, there might be\nadditional social and environment risks due to the fact that the project will be implemented in\nworedas and kebeles of Afar, Gambela, Benishangul-Gumuz, and Ethiopian Somali regions\nwhose populations meet the criteria detailed in OP/BP 4.10. These criteria refer to a distinct,\nvulnerable, social and cultural group, possessing the following characteristics, in varying\ndegrees: (a) self-identification as members of a distinct indigenous cultural group and\nrecognition of this identity by others; (b) collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats\nor ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats and\nterritories; (c) customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate from\nthose of the dominant society and culture; and (d) an indigenous language, often different from\nthe official language of the country or region. The Ethiopian Constitution recognizes the\npresence of many ethnic groups, including historically disadvantaged and vulnerable groups, as\nwell as the rights to their identity, culture, language, customary livelihoods, socioeconomic\nequity and justice. These groups include various nations, nationalities and peoples, pastoralists,\nand national minorities.\n\n2. Accordingly, the OP/BP 4.10 policy applies and the project has conducted an enhanced\nSA and extensive consultations with potential project beneficiaries and project affected peoples,\nincluding those identified as vulnerable and historically underserved groups to seek broad\nsupport from these groups; and to ensure that the design of the project is inclusive and equitable\nand reflects their needs in the most appropriate manner. The findings of the SA highlight the\npossible overlap with communities supported under the Government’s Commune Program and\nraises substantial risk, if the project is perceived to be supporting the Commune Program. Strict\nscreening criteria based on the findings of the recent Alignment Study and suggested guidance\nfor World Bank Task Teams with Subprojects with an Operational Interface with other initiatives\nof the Government of Ethiopia will be applied to ensure that the project is not knowingly active\nin these, particularly in nonviable commune centers/communities that are not well\nimplemented. Further, the SAis complemented by the RPF that assesses key socioeconomic\nfactors that require consideration; identifies vulnerable and historically underserved groups that\nmay be excluded from the program and be adversely affected as a result, and the necessary\nimpact mitigating measures; assesses any potential adverse social impacts of the project, and\nrecommends in appropriate measures toward addressing World Bank requirements on social\nsafeguards triggered by the project OP/BP 4.10 and OP/BP 4.12.\n\n3. Overall, the DRDIP will not undertake any subprojects that will displace people.\nHowever, it would support small-scale rural infrastructure that might affect land holdings of\nindividual farmers. While individual subprojects are not yet identified, there will be support for\nactivities such as small-scale infrastructure to improve productivity as well as other rural\ninfrastructure such as feeder roads. Therefore, as precautionary measure, the project has\ntriggered OP/BP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement; a RPF has been developed in light of this\n\n143\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 157
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "policy based on consultative processes that involve representatives from participating\ncommunities, cooperative and community actors; and will be publically disclosed in-country and\nin the World Bank’s InfoShop. Solutions to grievances related to land acquisition impacts or\nreduced access to natural resources will follow provisions provided in the RPF.\n\n\n**Social Assessment**\n\n4. The SA complements other safeguard policies triggered in the DRDIP, with the aim of\npreventing and mitigating undue harm to people and their environment in the development\nprocess. These policies provide guidelines for Bank and recipient staff in the identification,\npreparation, and implementation of programs and projects; and more importantly, these policies\nprovide a platform for the participation of stakeholders in the Project design, and have been an\nimportant instrument for building ownership among local population. The SA with the findings\nof the consultations have been publicly disclosed in-country and in the World Bank’s InfoShop.\nThe main highlights and suggested actions include the following:\n\n**(** a) _**Challenges of the host communities:**_ The SA results show that the refugee-hosting areas are\noften neglected. Since most of the refugee camps are located in the periphery and historically\ndisadvantaged regions of the country, known as emerging/developing regions, these areas are\noften characterized by deficits in social and economic services and infrastructure; occupied by\nminority ethnic groups; previously neglected by the past regimes of Ethiopia; and are\ninsecure/mostly unstable areas in terms of peace. The situation is exacerbated by the challenges\nof high level of deforestation, as a result of need for construction material for shelter, fuelwood,\nmarket construction; petty theft of agricultural produce such as fresh maize, vegetables and fruits\nsuch as banana, mango, papaya, etc. and reported organized looting at night; overgrazing and\nillegal hunting of wild animals by refugees; fishing by refugees without the consent of the host\ncommunities; increase in price of basic household items and peer pressure on the youths, leading\nto behavioral change, with potential for loss of cultural and social identity.\n\n**(b)** _**Livelihood activities:**_ In the five regions, refugee-hosting communities are located in the\nborder area of the country with arid and semi-arid temperature conditions. Almost all areas have\nerratic rainfall and are prone to the risk of nature. Hence, the host communities are mainly\nfarmers, agropastoralists, and pastoralists. Farmers are dominant in Tigray, Gambela, and\nBenishangul-Gumuz Regions. Agropastoralists and pastoralists are mainly found in Ethiopia\nSomali and Afar regions. In the regions where farming is the dominant economic activity, the\ncommunity members are also involved in animal husbandry to supplement their income as their\nsecondary means of livelihood. In the course of the discussions with potential end-users/\nbeneficiaries of the DRDIP, certain Project ideas were suggested in line with their major\nlivelihood strategy as well as prior experiences and anticipated results to their respective\nlivelihoods.\n\n**(c)** _**Most Vulnerable and Underserved Groups:**_ The most vulnerable groups identified in the\nfive regions are older people who do not have adequate income generating abilities and lack\ncaregivers; and usually depend on support from their relatives and farming from nearby\nfarmlands. Most of the older people keep small ruminants such as goats and also hens to get\nincome. _**Women and women headed household**_ were also categorized under the vulnerable\ngroups. In all areas women are subordinate to the men in the households and do all the domestic\n\n\n144\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 158
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "chores, child rearing, many of the farming activities, house construction (in pastoral areas of\nAfar and Somali), etc. Youths are vulnerable in refugee-hosting communities. Most youths,\nparticularly those who completed their high school and failed to get a pass mark to join\ngovernment universities and TEVET were unemployed and involved in some deviant acts such\nas chewing chat, alcoholism, gambling, and illegal ways of getting income.\n\n**(d)** _**People with disabilities (PWDs**_ ): Though not large in numbers, PWDs are among the\nvulnerable groups. PWDs are more in number in Tigray region because the area in the past was\nbattle ground of the Derg regime. In Tigray region’s Tselemt and Tahetay Adiaybo, there are a\nlarge number of veterans, who after the fall of the Derg regime, were reintegrated into the\ncommunity and are still being supported by the community and the government. People with\nUnidentified Liver Disease (ULD) are also found in Tigray region and are among the vulnerable\ngroups. The cause of the disease is a wild plant, locally called “Kech Arem”. Since the abdomen\nof victims of ULD get bulged and become disproportionate to the size of their head and leg, this\nresults in weakness and inability to walk.\n\n**(e)** _**Ethnic groups and ethnic minorities:**_ All Project targeted areas are dominated by\nunderserved ethnic groups or ethnic minorities. The two Woredas in Gambela Region are\ninhabited by the Nuer, Agnuah, and Opo ethnic groups. Berta, Mao, and Komo ethnic groups are\nresident in Benishangul-Gumuz. The Somali ethnic group is dominant in the Ethiopia Somali\nregion; and Afar ethnic group, in Afar region. The Somali and Afar ethnic groups are divided by\nclan. The Kunama ethnic group inhabits Project targeted areas of Tigray region.\n\n5. _**Community Consultation with Key Stakeholders:**_ Community consultations were\nconducted with different community groups in each woredas with the objective of informing the\nrefugee-hosting communities about the Project and receiving their views and opinions about the\nProject subcomponents. The host communities were also consulted on the RPF’s implementation\nprocedures. The host communities expressed their support for the Project and indicated that if\nimplemented well the activities in the components could address their pressing problems. Host\ncommunities indicated that no Project has been implemented to ease their problems as a result of\nhosting refugees and bearing the resulting burden/impacts. Besides, in most areas, even though\nthey were promised by the Government to receive 25 percent of the support given to the refugees\nby the UNHCR, they did on get as much as expected.\n\n\n**Grievance-Handling Mechanisms**\n\n6. The Project will develop and implement a cost effective and accessible grievancehandling mechanism. Grievances will be actively managed and tracked to ensure that appropriate\nresolution and actions are taken. A clear time schedule will be defined for resolving grievances,\nensuring that they are addressed in an appropriate and timely manner, with corrective actions\nbeing implemented and the complaints handled as early as possible to address specific concerns\nraised by the Project affected persons in a timely fashion and in an impartial manner.\nSpecifically, in the case of grievances arising in the course of Project implementing activities,\ntraditional and quasi-formal dispute settlement arrangements would be invoked to deal with the\nissues. Under these arrangements, in the first instance, aggrieved parties are encouraged to bring\ntheir complaints to the attention of local elders, who consult with the parties involved to resolve\nthe dispute in an amicable fashion. Complainants not satisfied with the decision of village\n\n\n145\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project targeted",
+ "confidence": 0.6084428429603577,
+ "start": 266,
+ "end": 268
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Community consultations",
+ "confidence": 0.6026767492294312,
+ "start": 369,
+ "end": 371
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8960726857185364,
+ "start": 386,
+ "end": 388
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RPF",
+ "confidence": 0.6760151386260986,
+ "start": 410,
+ "end": 411
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee-hosting communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6687606573104858,
+ "start": 386,
+ "end": 388
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Grievance-Handling Mechanisms",
+ "confidence": 0.5998086929321289,
+ "start": 509,
+ "end": 511
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "dispute settlement arrangements",
+ "confidence": 0.5804368853569031,
+ "start": 621,
+ "end": 624
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Complainants",
+ "confidence": 0.5922681093215942,
+ "start": 672,
+ "end": 673
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 159
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "leaders are advised to resort to quasi-formal structures of _kebele_ judicial tribunals, whose\nverdicts on the matters will be final. Although such grievance-handling mechanisms exist, there\nare few signs of them being used by local people. Owing to lack of capacity or other problems,\ngaps are noticeably observed in all visited _woredas._ The Project will make sure that such\ntraditional and quasi formal structures are consistently resorted to in the interest of smooth and\nfair settlement grievances.\n\n7. The ‘arbitration or reconciliation by elders’ is a widely used indigenous mechanism in\nresolving conflicts in many parts of the country. Although the term has different names among\ndifferent ethnic groups it has a common characteristic in that elders are the main people\ninvolved. For instance, among Gumuz ethnic group it is called Mangima. It is the most\nimportant traditional institution for preventing, resolving and managing ethnic conflicts of\ndifferent scales and levels in different parts of the country. Through the application of the\nMangima institution, the inter-ethnic conflict between the Gumuz and other ethnic groups that\nwere resettled in Metekel was somehow settled. Gradually, however, these traditional conflict\nresolution mechanisms have started to erode for various reasons. According to some elders,\nEthiopian State administration took conflict management responsibilities from clan and group\nleaders and placed it in the hands of the local ‘Kebele’ administrations.\n\n8. The Government has agreed to implement the Project in accordance with the following:\n(a) Land acquisition related grievances and disputes that arise during the course of\nimplementation of a resettlement and compensation program will be resolved in a manner that\nwill be cost efficient to the PAPs as stated in the RPF - starting with establishing a register of\nresettlement/compensation related grievances and disputes, with well-defined conditions of\naccess to this register (where, when, how) shall be widely disseminated within the interested area\nof the community as part of the consultation undertaken for the subprojects in general. The\ngrievance-redress mechanism process will be first handled by a “first instance” mechanism, on\nthe model of traditional dispute-resolution mechanisms, in the form of a locally selected\nmediation committee consisting of the following members: implementation agency, local\nnongovernmental organization (chairperson), Local representatives of Program Affected Persons\n(2 to 5) – these should be selected in the interested area. The existence and procedural details\nrelated with this first instance mechanism will be widely disseminated to the interested\npopulation as part of the consultation undertaken for the subprojects in general. Courts of law\nshall be considered as a “last resort” option, which in principle should only be triggered where\nfirst instance amicable mechanisms have failed to settle the grievance/dispute. However the\nConstitution allows any aggrieved person the right of access to court of law. For other Project\nrelated grievances, the Project will provide affordable and accessible procedures for grievance\nredress, including third party settlement of disputes which should take into account the\navailability of judicial resources and community traditional dispute resolution mechanisms.\n\n\n**Benefit Sharing Mechanism**\n\n9. In Ethiopia, there is no law on benefit sharing mechanism for activities and this might\npose a risk that communities might not benefit directly from the development objectives of the\nProject. While there is no law on benefit sharing arrangements, the constitution of Ethiopia\nrecognizes the participation of the communities in the development agenda and the Project has\nmet and discussed with the communities and other stakeholders during public consultation; and\n\n146\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 160
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "emphasized that the key instrument for communities to participate in the Project is the\ncommunity led refined Planning Approach, will be socially inclusive and will incorporate the\nknowledge and views of participating communities in the planning and management of\ndevelopment subproject activities. The Project will continue to consult with the communities and\nwill partner with other Projects in the area to explore possible cooperation in the provision of\nbasic services to these communities that are not in the focal area of this Project.\n\n\n**Commune Development Program and potential interface**\n\n10. The Government of Ethiopia’s Commune program has been going on in the two\nDeveloping Regional States of Gambela and Benishangul-Gumuz since 2010/2011. Based on\nprevious SA findings, there could be possible overlap with communities supported under the\nGovernment’s Commune Program with the DRDIP. This raises substantial risk, if the Project is\nperceived to be supporting the Commune Program in communities in which the Program has not\nbeen well implemented. Strict screening criteria based on the findings of the recent Alignment\nStudy and suggested guidance for World Bank Task Teams with Subprojects with an Operational\nInterface with other initiatives by the Government of Ethiopia will be applied to ensure that the\nProject is not knowingly active in these, particularly in nonviable commune\ncenters/communities. Further, the Government has reaffirmed that no Kebeles covered by the\nGovernment Commune Development Program will be considered in any World Bank funded\nprojects/programs.\n\n\n**Social Development Plan: Potential risks and challenges and recommendations**\n\n11. This social development plan as outlined below will ensure that the Project and its\nimplementing agencies will respect the dignity, rights and culture of groups meeting the OP 4.10\nrequirements and ensure that these people benefit from the DRDIP in a sustainable manner. The\nplan could be redefined during implementation and further consultations undertaken for the\nunderserved groups to ensure their full participation. In light of what has been outlined in the\nforegoing paragraphs, the _**Matrix**_ in table 7.1 provides the summary of potential risks and\nchallenges and recommendations.\n\n\n147\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 161
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Table 7.1. Social Development Plan: Potential Risks, Challenges, and Suggested Mitigating Measures**\n\n\n\n|Project
Component|Potential Risks and Challenges|Suggested Mitigation Measures/
Recommendations|Potential Opportunities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Cross-cutting**
**Issues**| There is a high risk of extra burden to
social amenities, theft/ looting of farm
produces, livestock and other properties
of host communities, risk of rape and
gender based violence on school girls as
well as environmental degradation in all
visited sites as cited by participants of the
SA.
Limited technical capacity of
implementing offices at Woreda and
kebele levels and back up/ technical
support from the higher hierarchies.
There may be a tendency to overlook the
needs of people with disability and
elderly people or not clearly anticipated at
the design stage. The PIM provides the
targeting process to be followed during
implementation phase.
Limited participation of women in the
design, implementation and monitoring
and evaluation of Project activities/ in
areas like Afar.
Perspectives and attitudes of refugees
have not been assessed in this SA (for
services designed for shared utilization
among host and refugee communities as
well as implications to the designed
Project ideas). Integrated approaches
likely to be compromised.
Weak integration between partners
working in refugees and host
communities
Community prioritization of subprojects
might be manipulated by different interest
groups
Many organizations came with similar
kind of promises, but disappeared after a| Awareness raising and behavioral change
education need to be designed for refugee
communities to ensure that the overall
social, economic, environmental as well as
other related impacts as stated by host
communities and the refugees themselves
will be mitigated and or minimized.
Culturally sensitive capacity support efforts
need to be used at different levels under the
Project components to clearly define the
process, content and mechanisms for
training
Benishangul Gumuz, Homosha Woreda,
Sherkole Kebele - discussants suggested to
identify specific groups of refugees who are
involved in illegal acts quite often. As an
example, “_Oudug_” ethnic group from South
Sudan refugees are frequently involved in
such undesirable deeds.
Site specific Project activities, budget
allocation and specific emphasis needs to
considered based on stress levels, type and
magnitude of negative impacts on host as a
result of refugees. Population of refugees in
the different camps and respective host
communities might also be taken in to
account for proportion of budget allocation
as well as focus areas under the proposed
Project.
The Project will establish a strong
coordination and integration of the Project
partners from the outset and at all levels,
including in the design, implementation,
and monitoring and evaluation phases; and
through regular, joint planning and review
forum will ensure community engagement;
and effective participatory targeting| Welcoming attitude of the host community
toward DRDIP as stated by the community
groups during consultation, is the first
attempt to address the refugee problems and
diverse impacts on the host communities.
Existing/established committees both from
refugees and host communities. In some
visited sites, e.g. Abol, Tahetay Adeyabo,
Homosha and others. These committees
meet regularly and discuss outstanding
issues and devise solutions jointly and
monitor the progress. This might need to be
reinforced through involving administrative
as well as legislative bodies (in both
refugees and host community levels and
responsible government bodies). Reporting
and monitoring mechanisms in effecting
decisions need to be designed.
Existence of land and water management
committees in various visited Kebeles will
be strengthened.
Earlier positive implementation experiences
in related activities by other Projects, e.g.,
SLMP, the AGP, and PSNP are
opportunities and will be replicated.
Good stock of civil servants in the Kebeles
visited; DAs, Health Extension Workers,
Veterinary technicians, Kebele Managers,
and Teachers committing themselves for
proper implementation of the program in a
culturally appropriate manner.|\n\n\n148\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 162
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Project
Component|Potential Risks and Challenges|Suggested Mitigation Measures/
Recommendations|Potential Opportunities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n||while. The perception that the Project will
follow the same trend, as noted by
participants during the consultation
meetings.
|mechanism. Successive training and
procedures/guidelines will be developed
with the active involvement of community
representatives from diverse social groups
(utilizing existing customary institutions as
entry points) as well as relevant partners at
all levels.
Facilitation skill to promote community
participation will be designed through
appropriate training and guideline
development for Project implementers
Innovative Project ideas need to be
encouraged.
The agenda for_developing responses to_
_displacement impacts_ may deserve
extensive studies and research deliberations.
The Project shall incorporate activities that
can serve such research needs. This could
also help design an integrated/ synchronized
approach to a sustained solution. A careful
identification and involvement of academic
and research institutions for the generation
of pragmatic solution ideas; as potential
stakeholders to the DRDIP.
||\n|**Component 1: **
_Social and_
_Economic Services_
_and Infrastructure_| Existence of many investors and large
proportions of land are allocated for
private investors in potential target
Woredas and kebeles in Gambela and
Benishangul-Gumuz Regions that affect
the construction of roads.
During summer Baro River overflows and
ruins the social service infrastructures
such as roads, schools, health centers in
Itang Special Woreda of Gambela
Region.
There is a concern that refugee children
will share schools which in turn persists| Participation of the end users and top level
decision makers in the land allocation
process to investors will be intensified.
Moreover, institutionalization
(mainstreaming projects and subprojects
with the appropriate government structure)
and clear handing over strategies will be
built in to the Project.
Organizing management Committees in the
respective Project targeted areas for
responsible and sustainable management of
the developed infrastructures.
The Project will liaise with refugee| Prior experience and practice as well as
current keenness of consulted communities
for contributing to the Project in the form of
labour and locally available construction
materials. In some instances communities
contributed cash for the construction and
expansion of schools in their villages.|\n\n\n149\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 163
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Project
Component|Potential Risks and Challenges|Suggested Mitigation Measures/
Recommendations|Potential Opportunities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n||the pressure to students class room
accommodation ratio.
Heavy trucks coming to refugee camps
are likely to damage the roads or impact
durability/long-term service (e.g. the
roads in Bambasi and more pronounced
in Asayita visited areas).
Unsustainable use of developed
infrastructures has been experienced in
prior initiatives. There are some
nonfunctioning infrastructures due to lack
of appropriate consultation and
incorporation of community concerns.|organization to provide targeted basic
services to the camps.
The Project will provide “on the job”
training for youths and will equip them with
the necessary/basic tools and equipment for
sustainable management and maintenance
of the infrastructures, including damaged
roads.
Identify together with the host communities
sites for the construction of social service
infrastructure.
Roads need to be constructed as per the
standard of Ethiopian road authority for
rural graveled roads and communities will
be consulted in doing so.||\n|**Component 2:**
_Sustainable_
_Environmental_
_Management_| Huge number of livestock holding by the
refugees will affect the attempts at
environmental rehabilitation.
Conflicts or tensions are likely to occur
between refugees and host communities
in managing water for irrigation as
observed in Benishangul, Bambassi,
Wamba kebeles.
Durability of appliances is at risk due to
their sensitivity to easy damage, including
maintenance and spare-parts for the
introduced technologies is also
questioned to the degree of affordability
and accessibility at local markets.
As a result of the immense deforestation,
springs are drained in some localities
such as SA Shoshore Kebele in
Benishanguel-Gumuz region| Prior identification of land for the Project
with the involvement of all concerned
stakeholders.
The Project will use conflict filter and
incorporate a careful study on the feasibility
of subprojects such as land/soil feature,
viability, etc (e.g. in Itang Special Woreda,
some areas are identified as sliding and
smash lands).
The Project will introduce appropriate and
if possible local technologies during
implementation. Further, members of the
community (such as youths with TVET
certification or similar skill acquaintance)
trained with basic application and
management skills will be incorporated into
the Project for self-reliance and livelihood
activities.
The Project in consultation with host
communities will introduce measures to
stop deforestation, particularly through
participatory forest management
approaches. The process will also be| Integrating this component, in particular to
sub component 2(b) Access to Energy, with
appropriate institutions such as existing
TVETs around target Woredas can be taken
as good potential hubs for the purpose.
Taking in to account the other projects
already involved in this category. The
lessons learned, including best practices
and/or failure from prior projects on
environmental rehabilitation programs will
be incorporated in the DRDIP during
implementation.|\n\n\n150\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 164
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Project
Component|Potential Risks and Challenges|Suggested Mitigation Measures/
Recommendations|Potential Opportunities|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|||discussed with the refugee community.||\n|**Component 3:**
_Livelihoods_
_Program_| Targeting/identification of the right
beneficiaries/end users is often biased,
and may exclude vulnerable and needy
groups of the community.
Illegal acts such as theft, robbery by
refuges might negatively impact
implementation of livelihood activities in
the host communities.
Due to cultural issues, women are less
likely to participate in livelihood
activities and are more prone to gender
based violence especially by some
refugee members| A well-developed and genuine participatory
approach and working guidelines need to be
utilized for the purpose of effective
targeting.
Behavioral change communication
education for refugee communities on the
culture, value and norms of communities
will ensure harmony and avoid conflicts.
Concerned government bodies will be
consulted to provide protection and
measures against the perpetrators of gender
violence.
| Existing primary/ multipurpose cooperative
in most visited areas facilitates the smooth
implementation of Project activities under
this component. There are a number of
cooperatives already established in some of
the sites, (e.g., Improved poultry, milk
processing, livestock fattening, horticulture
through irrigation schemes)
Some host community member youths
received vocational and technical trainings
from the ARRA (e.g. Tselemet woreda of
Tigray region, Bambasi Woreda of
Benishanguel-Gumuz) and are provided
with tools, though not adequate to start their
own business.|\n|**Component 4:**
_Project_
_Management, and_
_Monitoring and_
_Evaluation_| Trainings are often directed to technical
staffs. But the decision making body at
different offices lacks the required skill in
project management, M & E, particularly,
cultural and social sensitivities training
Capacity limitation in targeted Woredas,
both human/skill and material including
vehicles for better mobility for Project
purposes.
| Capacity gap assessments will be
undertaken prior to intervention. Both
technical as well as management bodies of
Project stakeholders must be targeted as
appropriate and will be equipped with
training in Project management.
Training on the Project safeguard
instruments to help create common
understanding among actors at all levels on
the Project safeguard instruments (ESMF,
RPF, and SA), will be undertaken to ensure
that mitigation measures are implemented
and potential risks are managed.| Utilization of existing data/ information
need to be taken into account. As disclosed
by the FGD participants, some offices
already have data base and plan for staff
training needs assessment in the respective
core processes (e.g., Itang Woreda)|\n\n\n151\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 165
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 8: Regional Secretariat on Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n1. The HOA is a region of displacement and migration as highlighted by the World Bank\nand the UNHCR study in 2015 on “ _Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of_\n_Africa_ ”. This has been driven by many factors ranging from conflicts, degradation of the\nenvironment, natural and manmade disasters, and poverty that forces people to migrate in search\nof economic opportunities amongst other reasons. Most of the displacement in the region has\nbeen protracted, lasting over an average of 10 years, as is the case with Somalia, Sudan, and\nSouth Sudan refugees. Even countries of relative stability like Kenya and Uganda have\nexperienced displacement of their populations internally. Displacement affects the countries of\norigin but also has spill over to the entire or most of the region, as is the case with the presence\nof Somali and South Sudanese refugees throughout the IGAD region. A regional response to\nforced displacement and mixed migration is therefore critical for peace and stability in the HOA.\n\n2. Forced displacement in the HOA is characterized by a majority of the displaced seeking\nrefuge within the region. Of the more than 3 million refugees and over 7 million internally\ndisplaced persons in the HOA, a vast majority are in protracted displacement lasting over 10\nyears on average. Displacement is largely addressed from a humanitarian perspective with the\ndevelopment angle being largely excluded from interventions. Further, the durable solutions as\nclassically defined (local integration, voluntary repatriation and resettlement) are not effective\ngiven that (i) only Uganda allows integration of refugees into the economy, (ii) the only\nsuccessful voluntary repatriation experience of South Sudan refugees was short lived, (iii) only\n6,000 of the 400,000 Somalis were ready to return home from Kenya’s Dadaab camp, and (iv)\nthe Syrian crisis has further shrunk the opportunities for resettlement abroad.\n\n\n**Rationale for the Regional Secretariat**\n\n\n3. The Regional Secretariat proposed under the DRDIP is aimed at addressing the defining\nreality of displacement and mixed migration nexus in the HOA both in the context of the\nregional operation but also the region as a whole, to advance and consolidate regional efforts\ntoward addressing displacement and mixed migration. More specifically, it will: (i) spearhead the\nadvancement of the development approach to displacement in the HOA; (ii) facilitate the\ncreation of knowledge with partnerships with relevant think tanks and/or universities in Djibouti,\nEthiopia and Uganda; as result of the DRDIP implementation on durable solutions; (iii) ensure\nthe annual DRDIP’s Regional Steering Committee Meeting, and periodic learning and sharing\nworkshops for all the HOA countries; and (iv) contribute to the better understanding of the nexus\nbetween socioeconomic development, forced displacement and mixed migration in the HOA by\ncommissioning studies and/or focused research.\n\n4. The Regional Secretariat will operate in an environment where there are limitations to\ncurrent options for durable solutions for forced displacement and the focus will need to be on\ntransitional/progressive solutions. Also for the HOA, except for Uganda, the host country\nrefugee policy and practice currently are not conducive to furthering transitional solutions; and\nthere is growing evidence that this is driving secondary displacement and migration especially of\nthe youth. However, the field reality indicates that while refugee policy except for Uganda does\nnot explicitly refer to right to work, refugees do participate in economic activities. The DRDIP\ntherefore will create a socioeconomic ecosystem for the communities in refugee hosting that will\n\n\n152\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.8130874037742615,
+ "start": 393,
+ "end": 394
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "displacement and mixed migration nexus",
+ "confidence": 0.528123676776886,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 407
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Regional Secretariat",
+ "confidence": 0.6487691402435303,
+ "start": 381,
+ "end": 383
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.7205193638801575,
+ "start": 409,
+ "end": 410
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somalis",
+ "confidence": 0.712607204914093,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "studies",
+ "confidence": 0.6831626296043396,
+ "start": 548,
+ "end": 549
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.9022343754768372,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.8323187828063965,
+ "start": 664,
+ "end": 665
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9056553244590759,
+ "start": 656,
+ "end": 657
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 166
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "facilitate greater economic returns for both host communities and refugees and the Regional\nSecretariat will facilitate the cross learning across participating countries and IGAD member\ncountries to allow for adaption and scaling up of viable innovative approaches. In addition, host\ncountry advocacy needs to be matched with working with refugee producing countries to look\nfor peace and stability and development at least in more conducive areas - look at options for\npiloting some measures.\n\n5. As the humanitarian agencies including the UNHCR are making a strategic shift from the\ncare and maintenance approach to self-reliance and development, there is need for synergy at the\npolicy and operational levels including understanding better the more successful approaches and\nfacilitating knowledge exchange and learning both in the context of the DRDIP but also\ninitiatives of other developmental and humanitarian agencies. IGAD as a regional organization\nhas convening and political mandate for the 8 countries of the Horn and is in a good position to\ninitiate regional conversations around the issues within the DRDIP.\n\n\n**Structure and Synergies**\n\n6. The Regional Secretariat will build on the IGAD Regional Consultative Processes (RCP)\non migration in place that aims to promote the common position of the IGAD Member States as\nprovided in the AU's and IGAD’s Migration Policy Frameworks. Furthermore, it aims to\nfacilitate regional dialogue and cooperation in migration management amongst IGAD Member\nStates by: (i) fostering greater understanding and policy coherence in migration; (ii)\nstrengthening regional institutional and technical capacities to implement the Migration Policy\nFramework for Africa, the African Common Position on Migration and Development, the Joint\nAfrica-EU Declaration on Migration and Development and other AU and IGAD policies on\nmigration; and (iii) improving inter-state and intra-regional cooperation on migration\nmanagement among countries of origin, transit and destination. Therefore the Regional\nSecretariat will build on existing foundations that will help consolidate its legitimacy among\nMembers States but also in regards to already available migration expertise.\n\n7. The migration program is situated within the Economic Cooperation and Social\nDevelopment Division and under the health and social development sector. It has been in\nexistence since 2006 and derives its mandate from a council of ministers decision. Over the years\nthe program through different donor funded projects has been able to develop a comprehensive\nregional migration policy Framework (RMPF) that has received the endorsement of IGADs\npolicy organs. This is the guiding policy document that provides strategic recommendations on\nhow to address forced displacement and mixed migration amongst other migration issues. The\nIGAD RCP is a dialogue mechanism on migration between member states and would be a\nnatural anchorage for all policy dialogues and advocacy on forced displacement and mixed\nmigration by expanding the space to engage more concretely with humanitarian and development\nactors. For continuation and sustainability, the Regional Secretariat will form a part of the\nbroader migration program of IGAD already endorsed by member states. Its work forms an\nintegral part of the Regional Migration Policy Framework and beyond the grant duration,\nlearning at the regional level, and policy dialogue on the development approach to displacement\nwill be continued. The partnerships established between member states, the humanitarian and\ndevelopment partners will be woven into the national consultative mechanisms (NCMs) at the\ncountry level and the Regional Consultative Process at the Regional level.\n\n\n153\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 167
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "8. Ongoing initiatives for instance the Swiss support to strengthen member states and\nregional capacities for migration management that has supported the establishment and\nstrengthening of NCMs on migration as well as the GIZ support to mainstream migration in\nresilience will support the Secretariat’s work. The proposed EUTF support toward the free\nmovement of people protocol will complement the interventions on forced displacement and\nmixed migration especially on mobility of people within the region. Other future projects\nrelevant to forced displacement and mixed migration and as provided for by the Regional\nMigration Policy Framework will further enhance and consolidate the Secretariats delivery.\n\n9. Best practices in addressing forced displacement and mixed migration will be\ndocumented, shared and banked with piloting of some of the practices by governments and\nhumanitarian and development partners. Under the overall framework of the IGAD Regional\nConsultative Process (RCP) on migration; a dialogue that brings together governments as well as\nhumanitarian and development actors in the Horn will be created; this will be a first step toward\ninitiating debate on the linkages between the two in displacement situations at the regional level.\n\n\n**Support Program under the DRDIP**\n\n\nThe Regional Secretariat will have the following specific objectives:\n\na. Advocate holistic and innovative regional responses to forced displacement and mixed\n\nmigration - this will be supported by evidence generated on displacement that would\ninfluence intervention in member states;\nb. Political dialogue and policy engagement – through initiating dialogues with policy\n\nmakers, academic and research institutions on transitional solutions in forced\ndisplacement;\nc. Generate evidence through research for innovative management of forced displacement\n\nand mixed migration;\nd. Build capacities of countries and institutions in the Horn of Africa to innovatively\n\nrespond to forced displacement and mixed migration;\ne. Knowledge generation and management, and Monitoring and Evaluation;\nf. Forge partnerships between humanitarian and development actors in the IGAD region in\n\nre-thinking the application of durable solutions; and\ng. Consolidate the capacity of IGAD to respond to forced displacement and mixed\n\nmigration and be a strong actor both regionally and internationally in the forced\ndisplacement and mixed migration discussions affecting the Horn.\n\nThe key functions of the Regional Secretariat will be the following:\n\n\na. Coordination: This will involve coordination on policy and practice amongst the project\n\ncountries, other member states and development and humanitarian actors. A forum of\npartners working on forced displacement and mixed migration within the framework of\nthe IGAD RCP will open up dialogue with the member states.\n\nb. Capacity Support: For the project countries, other member states agencies, research\n\ninstitutions and other partners in the advancement of the development approach to\ndisplacement and mixed migration in the Horn of Africa.\n\nc. Knowledge generation and sharing: Working with think tanks and academic institutions\n\nin the IGAD region to ensure learning and sharing.\n\n\n154\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 168
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "d. Operational support: Will operationalize the Secretariat’s work and the Project Regional\n\nSteering Committee .\n\n10. It is proposed that the support would be established in two phases:\n\n - Phase 1: Strategy development by the Secretariat; an advisory core team (composed of\n\nIGAD, the World Bank, the project countries, other Member states, development and\nhumanitarian actors) will guide the Secretariat’s strategy, which will be developed within\nthe first 6 months of project effectiveness. It is foreseen that the strategy will be validated\nand endorsed at the highest possible level for it to gain traction and serve as the reference\nframework on forced displacement and mixed migration for the project countries and the\nregion. The strategy will derive from the IGAD Strategy 2015-2020 already endorsed at\nthe highest political level at IGAD giving it credibility and a strong go forward support.\n\n - Phase 2: Implementation of the approved strategy of the Regional Secretariat including\n\nits role as the Secretariat for the Project Regional Steering Committee of the National\nprograms in each country. This will include (i) advancement of the development\napproach through regular dialogue amongst member states, humanitarian and\ndevelopment partners both at national and regional level; (ii) organization of Innovation\nand technology market place and provision of technical assistance on request to the\nproject countries in DRDIP intervention areas; (iii) documentation and dissemination of\ninnovative approaches; (iv) Creation of knowledge, annual learning and sharing in\npartnership with think tanks and universities in the region to carry out research on\ndisplacement and development; (v) development of a DRDIP portal to serve as a medium\nfor information-sharing; (vi) study tours to promote learning for agencies in project\ncountries to learn innovative approaches to displacement impacts both regionally and\ninternationally, in line with the annual leaning and sharing events for project countries\nand IGAD member states; (vii) mapping of policies and actors involved in transitional\nsolutions will be done and a Secretariat newsletter on the development approach to forced\ndisplacement and mixed migration regularly published and widely disseminated; (viii)\ncontinuous monitoring of mixed migration drivers and trends through the Regional\nMixed Migration Secretariat as part of the IGAD supported Mixed Migration Monitoring\nMechanism (4Mi) serving as a baseline for the impact of interventions on migration; (ix)\nstudy on gender, youth and displacement in the HOA will be conducted and findings used\nfor advocacy and to influence practice and programming by member states and partners;\n(x) development of a monitoring and evaluation system for use throughout the project\nduration; and (xi) annual meetings of the Project Regional Steering Committee to\nfeedback on the projects in the three participating countries and overall guidance on the\nimplementation of the strategy.\n\n\n**Expertise**\n\n\n11. The Secretariat will have in-house expertise for program management and includes a\nProject Implementation Team consisting of a Senior Program coordinator, Forced Displacement\nExpert, Project Accountant, Procurement officer, and a Knowledge Management and Monitoring\nand Evaluation officer. In addition, IGAD specialized institutions, but more importantly\nuniversities, think tanks and regional tertiary and research institutions will be contracted to\nundertake research, knowledge generation and documentation. Efforts will be made to have\n\n\n155\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 169
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "specific expertise exchanged between humanitarian and development organizations to further\nenhancing cooperation and partnership.\n\n\n**Indicative expenditure categories**\n\n\n12. The support grant will cover expenditures relating to the delivery of tasks, outputs and\ndeliverables under the program, including the following:\n\n - Expert(s) placed within the Regional Secretariat\n\n - Annual Regional Project Steering Committee meeting; other workshops and consultative\n\nmeetings; south-south learning and knowledge exchange\n\n - Consultancies and contracts for operational support, research and knowledge generation\n\n - Support to countries and agencies, monitoring and documentation\n\n - Secretariat office, equipment, and operating costs including travel and transportation\n\n\n**Location**\n\n13. The Secretariat will be based both in Nairobi with a Secretariat support office staffed\nwith operations, procurement, and accounts due to its strategic location in regard to humanitarian\nand development partners; and in Djibouti with respect to the overall fiduciary responsibilities\nwith the IGAD finance and administration in Djibouti.\n\n\n**Linkages**\n\n14. The Secretariat will forge linkages with the Great lakes initiative through the ICGLR.\nSpecifically, the Secretariat will have very close working relationships with the UNHCR\nRegional Hub based in Nairobi, the International Organization on Migration’s regional office in\nNairobi, the regional offices of the Democratic Republic of Congo in which the regional durable\nsolutions Secretariat (ReDSS) and the Regional Mixed Migration Secretariat are based will be\nkey. The expertise of the World Bank’s Fragility, Conflict and Violence Regional Unit in\nNairobi will be especially crucial with its expertise in development in fragile states.\n\n15. In addition regional mechanisms that address displacement and mixed migration\nincluding the Global initiative on Somali Refugees (GISR), Solutions Alliance Somalis (SAS) as\nwell as the Horn of Africa Initiative will also be close partners. National initiatives like the\nTransitional solutions Initiative, the UNHCR/IKEA livelihoods program in Ethiopia, the Refugee\nand Host Population Empowerment (ReHoPE) program in Uganda and others will be partners in\nlearning and knowledge banking and dissemination.\n\n16. The World Bank Office in Nairobi will be a key institution in all of the Secretariat’s\nengagements especially supporting the development and implementation of the monitoring and\nevaluation system.\n\n\n156\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICGLR",
+ "confidence": 0.5441728830337524,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "monitoring and\nevaluation system",
+ "confidence": 0.9863846898078918,
+ "start": 399,
+ "end": 403
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 170
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 9: Access to Energy**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The DRDIP will support communities to identify and prioritize investments with specific\nfocus on women, female-headed households and youth, who are disproportionately affected by\ndisplacement. The Project will focus on the host communities, but the project’s holistic approach\nwill ensure that the beneficiaries include refugees.\n\n2. The subcomponent 2(c): access to energy; addresses a number of issues, which to varying\ndegrees are found in all envisaged intervention areas. The subcomponent furthermore is expected\nto act as enabler of other subcomponent, most notably Component 3 – Livelihoods Program; as\nlack of energy often is an important impediment in creating employment opportunities. The link\nto other components underlines the fact that energy in all its forms is procured or, in the case of\nfirewood, collected for the services it provides. Envisaged Project intervention areas have\ndifferent energy endowments and energy needs are not identical. There are nevertheless\nimportant similarities observed in and around host communities of refugees in Djibouti, Uganda\nand, Ethiopia.\n\n3. The main need for energy is household cooking, which is met by collecting firewood.\nHost communities due to the increase in population numbers see increased demand for\ncommunal resources such as firewood and this in turn often results in greater burdens on women\nand children. Spending longer hours away from home in order to collect needed volumes\nexposes them to greater risk of violence [60] . The greater demand for firewood also leads to\ndeforestation. Under Component 2, demand-side interventions will also seek to address gender\nissues by reducing drudgery (time and energy spent on collecting fuel wood) and exposure to\nrisks and violence in fuel collection and by improving health and indoor air pollution through the\nuse of cleaner fuels and fuel-saving cooking technologies. Component 3 focuses on\nnontraditional livelihoods. Cooking devices/fuel supply chains, training and outreach programs\nalso offer the potential for new livelihood opportunities for women in particular.\n\n4. There is widespread recognition that increasing access to and use of more efficient,\ncleaner cooking and heating solutions in households could yield significant benefits in improved\nwomen and children’s health, reduced environmental and climate impacts, and improved gender\nequality. Where women and girls are responsible for gathering cooking fuel, they are often\nvulnerable to gender-based violence during fuel collection and transport. Clean and efficient\ncooking devices reduce the time spent for biomass collection. Women living in war-torn areas,\nsuch as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Somalia, and women in displaced-persons camps\nseem particularly vulnerable to sexual violence while they search for fuelwood in surrounding\nareas. In some part of Northern Uganda, studies have documented that men and boys started\n\n60 Exposure to the risk of gender-based violence is often measured in terms of the number of collection trips conducted by a woman as well as the\ntime and distances she travels. Incidences of gender-based violence is more difficult to measure but provides the most direct indicator with which\nto evaluate protection concerns. A 2014 UNHCR Report 2014 noted that in 2014, 41 percent of households in Uganda’s Nakivale refugee camp\nreported experiencing incidences of violence in the past six months while collecting firewood. The types of crimes reported include the\nconfiscation of firewood (23 percent), beating (20 percent), bodily injury (12 percent), assault (10 percent), attempted rape (5 percent), and rape\n(4 percent). Female refugees collect firewood 8.3 times per month, and girls age 17 and under collect wood 7.2 times per month. Time spent per\ntrip is three hours, and the average distance travelled is 5.7 km. (UNHCR 2014b). In Ethiopia, female refugees collect firewood for cooking an\naverage of six times per month, spending 3 hours and 25 minutes each trip and covering a roundtrip distance of 4.5 km. In Ethiopia, 33 percent of\nrefugee households reported one or more violent incidents while collecting firewood in the past 12 months, and 13.5 percent experienced rape,\nassault, or attempted rape (UNHCR 2014a). Cookstove and fuel projects by World Food Programme, UNEP, UNHCR, and others have had\nmeasureable success in reducing fuel collection trips by women.\n\n\n157\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.7134012579917908,
+ "start": 28,
+ "end": 29
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8291359543800354,
+ "start": 20,
+ "end": 23
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project intervention areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7479164004325867,
+ "start": 177,
+ "end": 180
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host communities of refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7924908399581909,
+ "start": 200,
+ "end": 204
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Cookstove and fuel projects",
+ "confidence": 0.6668378114700317,
+ "start": 780,
+ "end": 784
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Ethiopia",
+ "confidence": 0.8167664408683777,
+ "start": 704,
+ "end": 705
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014a",
+ "confidence": 0.5669306516647339,
+ "start": 777,
+ "end": 778
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugee households",
+ "confidence": 0.8461260795593262,
+ "start": 745,
+ "end": 747
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 171
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "collecting fuelwood to protect women’s safety. There are also positive development impacts\nwhere women are engaging within the clean cooking value chain not only as consumers and\nbeneficiaries of improved stoves, but also as producers, distributors and entrepreneurs for clean\nand efficient cooking solutions.\n\n\n5. Different types of improved cooking devices/fuel combinations yield different types of\nbenefits:\n\na. Efficiency improvements lead to:\n\n - reduced time and effort collecting fuels, especially for women and girls – reduced\n\ndrudgery and reduced exposure to violence in collecting fuel;\n\n - reduced expenditure buying fuel – money available for other household needs\n\n - reduced environmental impact due to lower fuel requirement\n\n - reduced climate impact (if unsustainable harvesting of woodfuel is reduced)\n\nb. Emission reductions (i.e. cleaner stove/fuel combinations) lead to:\n\n - improved indoor air quality and associated health benefits, also especially for\n\nwomen and infants.\n\n - reduced climate impact (as black carbon – i.e. particulate matter associated with\n\nincomplete combustion of biomass and a significant short-lived climate pollutantis reduced)\n\n6. Importantly there are also significant opportunities for fostering the development of\nnontraditional livelihoods particularly for women, in stove and fuel supply chains including\npotentially preparation and sale of processed biomass fuel (e.g. pellets). This aspect of cooking\ninterventions could be further supported under Subcomponent 3a.\n\n\n7. All interventions to increase access to, and adoption of more efficient, cleaner cooking\nsolutions will include a focus on understanding cooking preferences, needs and behaviors of the\ntarget beneficiaries; selecting options that will be suitable for current practices; and investing in\ntraining and, as needed behavior change efforts (further options for women’s employment), to\ncorrectly use the new technologies.\n\n\n8. Catalyzing and supporting a sustainable supply of affordable options for cleaner, more\nefficient cooking requires creating a conducive environment in which community, social and\nprivate enterprises can operate. This includes facilitating financing for enterprises and\nconsumers to make improved stove / fuel options available in targeted areas. An emerging\noption aimed at incentivizing enterprises to enter new markets and to assist in affordability of the\nmost impactful options, is to also provide results-based support. Intermediate results could\ninclude the number of cooking devices sold or number of households making use of cleaner,\nmore efficient cooking options.\n\n\n9. There is also the potential to provide results-based support based on specific types of\nimpacts (rather than on intermediate results noted above). Impact level results could include\nreduction in exposure to indoor air pollution and the associated negative health impacts;\nreduction in exposure to violence through reduced time collecting fuel; reduced environmental\nimpact; increased jobs for women in the cooking devices and fuel supply chain. By defining (i) a\n\n\n158\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 172
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "clear unit of benefit (e.g. an averted disability adjusted life year – A-DALY for a metric of health\nbenefit, or number of women’s jobs created in the supply chain as a metric of improved gender\nequality) and (ii) a methodology for measuring and verifying the specified benefit(s), it is\npossible to “monetize these co-benefits” through attracting impact investors or governments\nwilling to pay for the achievement of the specified impacts.\n\n\n10. Such an approach to “monetizing the co-benefits of more efficient, cleaner cooking” is\nbeing developed in a project in Laos, where use of advanced biomass cooking devices was\ndemonstrated to reduce exposure to harmful pollutants by 40 percent, and on that basis, impact\ninvestors are considering purchasing verified A-DALYs associated with the advanced cooking\ndevices intervention. Work is underway to explore a similar approach for a range of possible\n“gender benefits”, as well as short-live climate pollutant (black carbon) mitigation benefits.\n\n\n11. Piloting approaches to monetizing the co-benefits of more efficient, cleaner cooking in\nthe target beneficiary communities offers the potential to attract enterprises which otherwise may\nnot serve these communities, and to attract additional resources to develop the supply chain and\nexpand access to more efficient, cleaner cooking options, while also providing a solid monitoring\nand verification framework with which to measure performance and guide adjustments.\n\n\n12. As a possible starting point, there is good potential to further develop and pilot a\nmonetizing co-benefits approach – considering gender, health and environmental benefits – in\nUganda, where an existing World Bank-supported engagement – the Clean Cooking Supply\nChain Expansion project – is underway. New work under DRDIP could involve: (i) stove testing\nand trials in the target communities, building on testing and trialing work already undertaken in\nthe Clean Cooking Supply Chain Expansion project; and (ii) design of an intervention with a\nstrong focus on gender-informed design and gender benefits, exploring and if feasible including\na results based approach for gender and health impacts. This would be done in consultation with\nother stakeholders and with the support of the Bank-Executed AFREA Gender and Energy\nprogram where funding can support local and international gender experts and relevant studies,\nsuch as baseline impact assessments or field consultations. Additional discussions with the\ngovernment, development partners, civil society and various stakeholders will need to take place\nto further elaborate on this approach. If successful, the pilot could be scaled up and replicated in\nother countries cover under this project.\n\n13. Alternatives to cook stoves are not easily identified. The Project may support\ninvestigations into the promotion of bio-gas, which could, for larger cooking needs, be feasible.\nUptake in the use of bio-gas systems would support livelihood development, potentially assist in\nimproving sanitation and reduce overall demand for firewood.\n\n14. Host communities are often disadvantaged in the provision of school and health services,\nwhere intervention in the form of aid from international and national agencies paradoxically\nresults in services for refugees being better than that of the original population. Modern solar\nhome systems (SHS) can increasingly provide good services. It is known from various off-grid\ninterventions in Africa that teachers and health personnel when given a choice will avoid unelectrified areas. SHS at clinics and schools and in particular at staff housing can be an important\ntool for retaining and recruiting staff for health and teaching facilities. SHS also allows schools\nto operate after sunset and clinics to safely store vaccines and heat sensitive medicine.\n\n\n159\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 173
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "15. Modern smaller solar lanterns propagated by the World Bank/IFC Lighting Africa\nprogram and SHS can play an important role in supporting development of small retail and\nservice outlets, thus again supporting component 3. They also allow people to charge phones,\nwhich again can be a driver of local economic development and SHS and solar lanterns\nsimultaneously provide an important improvement in quality of life at home. Street lighting is an\nimportant public good, which the Project will seek to foster in an integrated manner together\nwith other electricity interventions.\n\n16. Access to potable water is critical and a priority will be the use of solar PV for direct\nsolar pumping applications. This technology negates the need for batteries thus reducing cost and\nimproving reliability.\n\n17. The need for services through use of electricity can also be met by grid connections and\nthe establishment of mini-grids. Combined sizes of host communities and refugee camps\npotentially provide economy of scale to justify grid connections and/or establish mini-grids. In\nDjibouti the Project has identified that new national main grid lines are being constructed in\nproximity to two areas of intervention and therefore the most cost-effective way for provision of\nelectricity for these areas is likely to be to extend the grid.\n\n18. Higher capacity provision of electricity allows for a number of productive uses of\nelectricity to be introduced. Examples are milling of grains, wood work, welding and food\nprocessing.\n\n19. A very important livelihood opportunity and a critical success factor will be the\nestablishment of appropriate maintenance and operation procedures. Through training, small\ngrants and targeted support it will be necessary to establish the capability to repair and maintain\nmodern cock stoves, bio-gas installations, SHS and internal household wiring.\n\n\n160\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 174
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**Annex 10: Map of interventions areas**\n\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n161\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/384311467996731135/pdf/PAD1678-PAD-P152822-IDA-R2016-0090-1-Box394886B-OUO-9.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 175
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file