diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_107/raw/doc_107_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_107/raw/doc_107_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_107/raw/doc_107_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,5971 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "Document of\n# **The World Bank**\n\n**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY**\nReport No: PAD2019\n\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\nON A\n\nPROPOSED GRANT\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 71.8 MILLION\n\n(US$ 100 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\nAND\n\nA PROPOSED GRANT\n\nFROM THE AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION TRUST FUND\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 400 MILLION\n\nTO THE\n\nISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN\n\nFOR A\n\nCITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT\n\n(P160567)\n\nOctober 6, 2016\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice\nSOUTH ASIA\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their\nofficial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n\n(Exchange Rate Effective August 31, 2016)\n\n\nCurrency Unit =\n\n\nUS$ = 66.50 Afghani\n\n\nUS$ = .71718519 SDR\n\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJanuary 1 ‐ December 31\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Annette Dixon\n\nCountry Director: Robert J. Saum\nSenior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz‐Vasquez\n\nPractice Manager: David Warren\nTask Team Leader: Susan Wong\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS\n\n\nAFN Afghanistan Afghani (Afghanistan currency)\n\n\nAFMIS Afghanistan Financial Management Information System\n\n\nARTF Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund\n\n\nCBR Capacity Building for Results\n\n\nCCDC Cluster Community Development Council\n\n\nCCAP Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project\n\n\nCDC Community Development Council\n\n\nCDD Community Driven Development\n\n\nCDP Community Development Plan\n\n\nCPF Country Partnership Framework\n\n\nCPM Community Participatory Monitoring\n\n\nDAB Da Afghanistan Bank\n\n\nDG Director General\n\n\nDMM Deputy Minister of Municipalities\n\n\nDRR Disaster Risk Reduction\n\n\nEC Environmental Clearance\n\n\nERR Economic Rate of Return\n\n\nESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework\n\n\nESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan\n\n\nESSU Environmental and Social Safeguards Unit\n\n\nFP Facilitating Partner\n\n\nFMA Financial Management Agent\n\n\nGA _Gozar_ Assembly\n\n\nGRS Grievance Redress System or Service\n\n\nHQ Headquarters\n\n\nIA Implementing Agency\n\n\nIBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "AFMIS Afghanistan Financial Management Information System",
+ "confidence": 0.7971138954162598,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 16
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9784563779830933,
+ "start": 4,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "ICR Implementation Completion Report\n\n\nIDA International Development Association\n\n\nIDLG Independent Directorate of Local Governance\n\n\nIDP Internally Displaced Person\n\n\nIE Impact Evaluation\n\n\nIFR Interim Financial Report\n\n\nMAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock\n\n\nMCG Maintenance Cash Grant\n\n\nMEW Ministry of Energy and Water\n\n\nMoE Ministry of Education\n\n\nMoF Ministry of Finance\n\n\nMoPH Ministry of Public Health\n\n\nMoU Memorandum of Understanding\n\n\nMRRD Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development\n\n\nMUDA Ministry of Urban Development Affairs\n\n\nM&E Monitoring and Evaluation\n\n\nNCB National Competitive Bidding\n\n\nNEPA National Environmental Protection Agency\n\n\nNPA National Procurement Agency\n\n\nNPP National Priority Program\n\n\nNSP National Solidarity Program\n\n\nOC Oversight Consultant\n\n\nPCMT Procurement Contracts Management Team\n\n\nPDO Project Development Objective\n\n\nPFMRP Public Financial Management Reform Project\n\n\nPIU Project Implementation Unit\n\n\nPMU Provincial Management Unit\n\n\nPP Procurement Plan\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "PPR Procurement Prior Review\n\n\nPPU Public Procurement Unit\n\n\nPRAMS Procurement Risk Assessment and Management System\n\n\nRAP Resettlement Action Plan\n\n\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\n\n\nSAO Supreme Audit Office\n\n\nSBD Standard Bidding Document\n\n\nSDU Special Disbursement Unit\n\n\nSTEP Systematic Tracing of Exchange in Procurement\n\n\nToR Terms of Reference\n\n\nTTL Task Team Leader\n\n\nUN United Nations\n\n\nUNAMA United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan\n\n\nUNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees\n\n\nWDR World Development Report\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**BASIC INFORMATION**\n\n\n[✔] Situations of Urgent Need or Assistance/or Capacity Constraints\n\n\n[ ] Financial Intermediaries\n\n\n[ ] Series of Projects\n\n|Approval Date
27‐Oct‐2016|Closing Date
31‐Oct‐2020|Environmental Assessment Category
B ‐ Partial Assessment|\n|---|---|---|\n|Bank/IFC Collaboration
No|Joint Level
|Joint Level
|\n\n\n\n**Proposed Development Objective(s)**\n\nThe Project Development Objective for the Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project is to improve the delivery of core\ninfrastructure and social services to participating communities through strengthened Community Development\nCouncils (CDCs). These services are part of a minimum service standards package that the Government is\ncommitted to delivering to the citizens of Afghanistan.\n\n\n**Components**\n\n\n**Component Name** **Cost (USD Million)** **Comments**\n\nGovernment will be providing an additional\n1. Service Standards Grants $290\nUS$128 million for service standards grants\n\n\n2. Institution Building $131\n\n\n3. M&E, Knowledge Learning $ 5\n\n\n4. Project Implementation and\n$ 74\nManagement\n\n\n**Organizations**\n\n\nPage 1 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7653467655181885,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8597374558448792,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Service Standards Grants",
+ "confidence": 0.5918595790863037,
+ "start": 218,
+ "end": 221
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8334211707115173,
+ "start": 183,
+ "end": 184
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\nBorrower :\n\n\n\nMinistry of Finance\n\n\n\nImplementing Agency : Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development, Independent Directorate of Local\nGovernance\n\n**PROJECT FINANCING DATA (IN USD MILLION)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|✔
[ ]
Counterpart
Funding|[ ] IBRD|[ ] IDA Credit
[ ] Crisis Response
Window
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|✔
[ ] IDA Grant
[ ] Crisis Response
Window
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|Col5|✔
[ ] Trust
Funds|[ ]
Parallel
Financing|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Total Project Cost:
628.00
|Total Project Cost:
628.00
|Total Donor Financing:
500.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IDA):
100.00|Total Donor Financing:
500.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IDA):
100.00|Financing Gap:
0.00
|Financing Gap:
0.00
|Financing Gap:
0.00
|\n\n\n**Financing (in USD Million)**\n\n\n**Expected Disbursements (in USD Million)**\n\n\n**WB Fiscal Year** 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021\n\n\n**Annual** 20.0 120.0 150.0 150.0 60.0\n\n\n**Cumulative** 20.0 140.0 290.0 440.0 500.0\n\n\nPage 2 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**INSTITUTIONAL DATA**\n\n\n**Practice Area (Lead)**\n\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice\n\n\n**Contributing Practice Areas**\n\n\n**Gender Tag**\n\nDoes the project plan to undertake any of the following?\n\na. Analysis to identify Project‐relevant gaps between males and females, especially in light of country gaps\nidentified through SCD and CPF\n\nYes\n\nb. Specific action(s) to address the gender gaps identified in (a) and/or to improve women or men's\nempowerment\n\nYes\n\nc. Include Indicators in results framework to monitor outcomes from actions identified in (b)\n\nYes\n\n\n**SYSTEMATIC OPERATIONS RISK‐ RATING TOOL (SORT)**\n\n\n**Risk Category** **Rating**\n\n\n1. Political and Governance High\n\n\n2. Macroeconomic Substantial\n\n\n3. Sector Strategies and Policies Substantial\n\n\n4. Technical Design of Project or Program Substantial\n\n\n5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability Substantial\n\n\n6. Fiduciary Substantial\n\n\n7. Environment and Social Substantial\n\n\n8. Stakeholders Moderate\n\n\n9. Other\n\n\n10. Overall High\n\n\n\nPage 3 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "INSTITUTIONAL DATA",
+ "confidence": 0.607286274433136,
+ "start": 17,
+ "end": 19
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7855084538459778,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SYSTEMATIC OPERATIONS RISK‐ RATING TOOL",
+ "confidence": 0.57281494140625,
+ "start": 138,
+ "end": 144
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**COMPLIANCE**\n\n\n**Policy**\nDoes the project depart from the CPF in content or in other significant respects?\n\n[ ] Yes [✔] No\n\nDoes the project require any waivers of Bank policies?\n\n[ ] Yes [✔] No\n\nHave these been approved by Bank management?\n\n[ ]Yes [ ] No N/A\n\nIs approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?\n\n[ ] Yes [✔] No\n\n\n**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project** **Yes** **No**\n\nEnvironmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01 ✔\n\nNatural Habitats OP/BP 4.04 ✔\n\nForests OP/BP 4.36 ✔\n\nPest Management OP 4.09 ✔\n\nPhysical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11 ✔\n\nIndigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10 ✔\n\nInvoluntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12 ✔\n\nSafety of Dams OP/BP 4.37 ✔\n\nProjects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50 ✔\n\nProjects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60 ✔\n\n\n**Legal Covenants**\n\n\nThe Recipient shall carry out the Project in accordance with the Operations Manual, the Safeguard Instruments, the\nFinancial Management Manual and the Procurement Plan.\n\n\nThe Recipient shall make the proceeds of the financing available as Rural Area Service Standards Grants to Community\nDevelopment Councils (including clusters of CDCs) under Rural Area Service Standards Grant Agreements to be entered\n\n\nPage 4 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ninto by representatives of the CDC and MRRD, and as Urban Area Block Grants to Community Development Councils\nor Gozar Assemblies under Urban Area Block Grant Agreements to be entered into by representatives of the CDC or\nthe GA (as the case may be) and IDLG, all under terms and conditions which shall have been approved by the\nAssociation.\n\n\nThe Recipient shall provide counterpart funds for the financing of the Project in an amount which shall not be less than\n$128,000,000 in the aggregate to be disbursed for the Project no later than the Closing Date.\n\n\nEffectiveness Condition\nThe Operations Manual has been submitted to, and found to be satisfactory by, the Association.\n\n\nPage 5 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**PROJECT TEAM**\n\n\n**Bank Staff**\n\n\n**Name** **Role** **Specialization** **Unit**\n\n\nTeam Leader (ADM Lead Social Development\nSusan Wong GSUSD\nResponsible) Specialist\n\nProcurement Specialist (ADM\nAnand Kumar Srivastava Senior Procurement Specialist GGO06\nResponsible)\n\n\nMuhammad Abbass Rahimi Procurement Specialist Procurement Analyst GGO06\n\n\nFinancial Management Sr Financial Management\nAsha Narayan GGO24\nSpecialist Specialist\n\n\nAbdul Hai Sofizada Team Member Senior Education Specialist GED06\n\n\nAbdul Wali Ibrahimi Team Member Urban Operations Officer GSU12\n\n\nAmanullah Alamzai Team Member Agricultural Specialist GFA12\n\n\nGhulam Dastagir Sayed Team Member Senior Health Specialist GHN06\n\n\nHamayon Aslan Team Member Team Assistant SACKB\n\n\nJuan Carlos Alvarez Team Member Senior Counsel LEGES\n\n\nKomlan Kounetsron Team Member Senior Operations Officer GSURR\n\n\nMegumi Makisaka Team Member Consultant GSU06\n\n\nMir Ahmad Ahmad Team Member Water Resources Specialist GWA09\n\n\nSr. Social Development\nMohammad Yasin Noori Team Member GSU06\nSpecialist\n\nMohammed Ajmal\nTeam Member Transport Specialist GTI05\nAskerzoy\n\n\nNajla Sabri Team Member Social Development Specialist GSU06\n\n\nObaidullah Hidayat Team Member Environmental Specialist GEN06\n\n\nPaul Maximilian Bisca Team Member Consultant GSUGL\n\n\nQais Agah Team Member Consultant, Social Specialist GSU06\n\n\nRahimullah Wardak Team Member Senior Procurement Specialist GGO06\n\n\nLead Social Development\nSean Bradley Team Member GSUGL\nSpecialist\n\nSr. Social Development\nShankar Narayanan Team Member GSU06\nSpecialist\n\n\n\nPage 6 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8775748610496521,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9141707420349121,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nStephen George Karam Team Member Lead Urban Specialist GSU12\n\n\nWahida Obaidy Team Member Team Assistant SACKB\n\n\n**Extended Team**\n\n\n**Name** **Title** **Organization** **Location**\n\n\nSocial Development Specialist\nElizabeth Mccall Formerly WB\n(Consultant)\n\nSocial Development Specialist\nMohammad Ateeq Zaki Formerly WB Kabul, Afghanistan\n(Consultant)\n\n\nPage 7 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**AFGHANISTAN**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 10**\n\n\n**A. Country Context** ............................................................................................................... 10\n\n\n**B. Sectoral and Institutional Context** ................................................................................... 12\n\n\n**C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes** ............................................. 13\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 14**\n\n\n**A. PDO** ................................................................................................................................... 14\n\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries** ......................................................................................................... 14\n\n\n**C. PDO‐Level Results Indicators** ........................................................................................... 14\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 15**\n\n\n**A. Project Components** ......................................................................................................... 15\n\n\n**B. Project Cost and Financing** ............................................................................................... 26\n\n\n**C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design** ..................................................... 27\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................... 29**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements** ........................................................... 29\n\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation** ................................................................................. 32\n\n\n**C. Sustainability** .................................................................................................................... 33\n\n\n**D. Role of Partners** ................................................................................................................ 34\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS ....................................................................................................................... 34**\n\n\n**A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks** ........................................................... 34\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 36**\n\n\n**A. Economic and Financial (if applicable) Analysis** .............................................................. 36\n\n\n**B. Technical** ........................................................................................................................... 38\n\n\n**C. Financial Management** ..................................................................................................... 38\n\n\n**D. Procurement** ..................................................................................................................... 39\n\n\n**E. Social (including Safeguards)** ............................................................................................ 41\n\n\n**F. Environment (including Safeguards)** ................................................................................ 42\n\n\n**G. Other Safeguard Policies** .................................................................................................. 43\n\n\nPage 8 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**H. World Bank Grievance Redress** ....................................................................................... 43\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ..................................................................... 44**\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 50**\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ..................................................................... 61**\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN ...................................................................... 120**\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS…………………………………………………………………………… 124**\n\n**ANNEX 5: AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PROGRAM: ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS**\n**LEARNED ............................................................................................................................. 126**\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: GENDER PLAN FOR CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECTS ....................... 136**\n\n\nPage 9 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n**A. Country Context**\n\n\n1. **Following the fall of the Taliban government in 2001, Afghanistan has been the focus**\n**of a large-scale reconstruction effort that has gone through a number of phases.** The peace\nand reconstruction agreements reached in Bonn produced a national constitution, a restructured\nexecutive branch headed by a strong presidency, and an elected national parliament, nearly a third\nof which consists of women representatives. This first phase of reconstruction launched quickly,\nwith donors using the World Bank-managed Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF) to\npool funding in support of a core set of national governance and service delivery programs.\n\n2. **From 2008 onwards reforms began slowing, coinciding with a return of the Taliban**\n**insurgency and an increase in cross-border attacks** . The heavily criticized 2009 election was\nfollowed by a period of confrontation between the Karzai government and the US-led support\ncoalition. During this period corruption increasingly spun out of control, reforms tapered off, and\npopular disillusionment with the government led to rising support for the insurgency. At the same\ntime, the international coalition announced its plans to withdraw over 100,000 troops by 2014,\nwith a target of full withdrawal and handover to the Afghan government by 2016. To help smooth\nthat transition, an International Conference held in Tokyo in July 2012 committed development\nassistance for the next ten years at levels that were intended to allow the country to maintain a\nslow glide down from the unrealistically high levels of international aid to more sustainable levels\nof aid that would complement rather than replace national revenue and expenditure.\n\n3. **Many of the initial assumptions that supported this scenario however did not prove**\n**to be realistic** . Attacks by the Taliban and other groups rose significantly, forcing the government\nand donor partners to maintain high levels of security expenditure. The contested election of 2014,\nwhich brought the current National Unity Government to power, led to long delays in naming key\ngovernment appointments, which not only prevented the new government from following through\non policies but also deterred Afghan and outside investors from marshalling private sector\nresources into the Afghan economy, where they could create jobs. And both donors and the new\ngovernment were surprised by the size of the fiscal gap inherited from the outgoing administration,\nwhich was filled only when donors agreed to move outer year pledges forward.\n\n4. **Despite the political and security upheavals over the past 15 years, some notable**\n**economic and social progress on post-conflict reconstruction was achieved.** From 2003 –\n2012, economic growth averaged 9.4 percent annually driven primarily by aid and security\nspending. This positive economic growth helped raise GDP per capita from US$186 in 2002 to\nUS$688 in 2012. Key human development indicators including school enrollment, life\nexpectancy, and access to water also improved markedly. School enrollment increased from 1\nmillion in 2001 to 9.2 million in 2011. Today, girls account for over one-third of school children\ncompared to nearly none in 2001. In the health sector, primary health care coverage expanded\n\n\nPage 10 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nsignificantly and infant and maternal mortality rates declined. Major infrastructure investments\nhave led to gains in access to water, sanitation, electricity, and road connectivity. From 2007-08\nto 2013-14, the share of population with access to safe drinking water increased from 27 to 65\npercent; and the share of population with access to electricity increased on average from 41.7 to\nalmost 90 percent nationally. [1] Afghanistan has held five national elections since 2001, established\na more open environment for the media and civil society, and drastically increased women’s\nparticipation in government, business, and public life.\n\n5. **Major security threats however pose formidable challenges to continuing socio-**\n**economic progress.** The foremost constraint facing Afghanistan’s development prospects is the\nongoing conflict and its broader implications for the economy and society. Afghanistan is a deeply\nfragile and conflict-affected country. Nearly four decades of protracted conflict have resulted in\nweakened government institutions and severe social and ethnic cleavages. The three most relevant\nsociological fracture lines concern ethnic and tribal identity; rural versus urban divides; and\nvarying beliefs in the changing role of women in political and economic life. Fragility and conflict\ncontinue to be critical threats to personal safety, public service delivery, and private investments.\nAccording to the United Nations (UN), civilian casualties are on the increase, with 2015 recording\nthe highest level on record of conflict-related civilian deaths and injuries. The latest July 2016\nreport by the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan covering the period April-June\n2016 estimated that civil servants had access to only 60 percent of districts, the lowest figure\nrecorded since 2007 **,** when access stood at over 80 percent. [2] The lack of security affects Afghan\ncitizens on a daily basis and makes the government’s delivery of services across the country’s 34\nprovinces extremely difficult.\n\n6. **And despite earlier accomplishments, Afghanistan remains one of the least developed**\n**countries in the world** . Poverty rates stand at 39.1 percent as of 2013-14, with signs of growing\ninequality. Gaps in access to services between the poor and non-poor are sizeable. Economic\ngrowth fell sharply to 1.5-2 percent in 2014 and 2015 respectively. Donor plans to reduce foreign\naid is another major challenge. Afghanistan is highly dependent upon foreign aid, which amounted\nto 45 percent of GDP in 2013. Security expenditures are remarkably high (with on-budget and\noff-budget security spending amounting to approximately 25 percent of GDP in 2014), thus\nlimiting fiscal space for much needed civilian operating and development spending. Furthermore,\nthe country’s demographic trends make poverty reduction challenging. Afghanistan faces high\npopulation growth and a youth bulge, with 400,000 entrants into the labor force each year. The\nproportion of the population aged 15 or below is 51.3 percent, making Afghanistan one of the\nyoungest countries in Asia with extremely high dependency ratios. These demographic pressures\nare in the future likely to be exacerbated by significant numbers of returning refugees and\ninternally displaced persons (IDPs). Lastly, vulnerability to weather-related shocks and natural\ndisasters is high in Afghanistan especially among poorer households.\n\n\n1 Central Statistics Organization of Afghanistan (CSO). 2016. _Afghanistan Living Conditions Survey 2013-2014_ .\nKabul: CSO; World Bank. 2016. _Afghanistan Systematic Country Diagnostic_ . Washington, DC: World Bank\n2 UNAMA. 2016. _Civil Servants Districts Accessibility_, April to June 2016.\n\n\nPage 11 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7915816903114319,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9920293092727661,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "July 2016\nreport",
+ "confidence": 0.8068171143531799,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "conflict-related civilian deaths and injuries",
+ "confidence": 0.5608918070793152,
+ "start": 281,
+ "end": 286
+ },
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.8410009741783142,
+ "start": 291,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "United Nations Assistance Mission",
+ "confidence": 0.5458061099052429,
+ "start": 294,
+ "end": 298
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9974645376205444,
+ "start": 156,
+ "end": 157
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8609079718589783,
+ "start": 290,
+ "end": 291
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2007",
+ "confidence": 0.5712571144104004,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "civil servants",
+ "confidence": 0.6159716844558716,
+ "start": 307,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Poverty rates",
+ "confidence": 0.5865258574485779,
+ "start": 397,
+ "end": 399
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9636865258216858,
+ "start": 379,
+ "end": 380
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.569064199924469,
+ "start": 304,
+ "end": 305
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2007",
+ "confidence": 0.6327688097953796,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "civil servants",
+ "confidence": 0.568856954574585,
+ "start": 307,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**B. Sectoral and Institutional Context**\n\n\n7. **In 2003, and in response to the severe deficit of basic services and trust in central**\n**government’s abilities, the newly installed government of President Karzai established the**\n**National Solidarity Program (NSP).** NSP is one of the earliest World Bank-funded initiatives,\nwhich has used a community-driven development (CDD) approach to reach approximately 35,000\ncommunities over the past 14 years. NSP is an on-budget program implemented by the Ministry\nof Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD) that provides block grants to communities so\nthat they can invest on the basis of community development plans formulated with the help of\nFacilitating Partners (FPs) (usually NGOs) hired and managed by the government. NSP has\nhelped establish CDCs across all provinces of Afghanistan. Half of all council seats are allocated\nto women, giving them the opportunity to participate in decision-making at the village level and a\nforum to voice their opinions. NSP has worked through CDCs to identify and implement some\n82,000 small-scale reconstruction and development activities, providing over 20 million Afghans\nwith access to improved water supply and sanitation, rural roads, irrigation, power supply, health,\nand education services. The program has generated 47.8 million days of work for skilled and\nunskilled workers, injecting much needed short-term wage transfers into poor rural communities\nthroughout Afghanistan. NSP’s recent Maintenance Cash Grant (MCG) program, which has so\nfar reached 3,800 communities, helps to ensure that the employment generated will provide an\nestimated two to three months of food security to participating households.\n\n8. **From the perspective of the national government, while NSP has been a major success**\n**story, it also operates under a number of constraints.** First, the NSP model was never adopted\nby Afghan cities, even though several of the same NGOs that execute NSP have been running\nsmall but successful projects of their own in urban areas. Second, despite many efforts by MRRD\nand the World Bank, other line ministries have been reluctant to work through CDCs, viewing\nthem as project committees of MRRD and NSP only. This approach has resulted in fragmentation\nand parallel channels of service delivery. And third, NSP block grant sizes are too large for the\ngovernment to sustain over the long term given the fiscal scenario for the country. At US$200 per\nfamily and an average block grant size of approximately US$38,000 per community, national\ncoverage – which would require at least 50 percent of the Government’s development budget [3] would be unsustainable. Gaps in service delivery for the poor would in the future need to be filled\nin a more harmonized and coordinated manner working across multiple ministries.\n\n9. **In response to these and other clear development challenges, in December 2014, the**\n**new National Unity Government declared its commitment to reform and recovery through**\n**its paper “Realizing Self-Reliance: Commitments to Reforms and Renewed Partnership.”**\nThat paper, presented at the London Conference, outlined a reform agenda aimed at helping the\n\n\n3 Calculations based upon analysis from report of Bradley, Sean, Robert Wrobel, Makiko Watanabe, Naila Ahmed,\nand Richard Spencer Hogg. 2015. _Technical Assistance Paper on the National Solidarity Program of the Islamic_\n_Republic of Afghanistan_ . Washington, DC: World Bank.\n\n\nPage 12 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ncountry move towards peace, recovery, and growth. [4] The Government prioritized seven\nprogrammatic areas of critical importance for reform: (i) improving security and political stability;\n(ii) tackling the underlying drivers of corruption; (iii) building better governance; (iv) restoring\nfiscal sustainability; (v) reforming development planning and management; (vi) bolstering private\nsector confidence and creating jobs; and (vii) ensuring citizens’ development and securing human\nrights.\n\n10. **Within the last pillar, the Government promised to develop a Citizens’ Charter that**\n**will set a threshold of core services to be provided to all communities and help make CDCs**\n**inclusive and representative bodies** . Consequently, in September 2015, the Government\nannounced its intention to launch the Citizens’ Charter National Priority Program (“Citizens’\nCharter”) as one of twelve national priority programs meant to implement the reform agenda.\n\n11. **In line with the country’s reform plans, the Afghanistan Country Partnership**\n**Framework (CPF) is currently being prepared and is expected to be completed by the end of**\n**CY2016.** It covers the four year period from FY2017 to FY2020 and contains three broad pillars:\n(i) building strong and accountable institutions; (ii) inclusive growth; and (iii) social inclusion.\nThe Citizens’ Charter will be a major contributor to the first pillar of building strong and\naccountable institutions especially by strengthening the capacity of CDCs to plan and monitor\nlocal service delivery and hold government and service providers better to account. By helping to\nimprove services, especially for the poor and most vulnerable, the Citizens’ Charter will also\ncontribute to the third CPF pillar of social inclusion.\n\n\n**C. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes**\n\n\n12. **The Citizens’ Charter aims to contribute to the Government’s long-term goals of**\n**reducing poverty and deepening the relationship between citizens and the state** . It will\nachieve this in two ways. First, by providing development services and grants through CDCs, the\ngovernment will be increasing trust that a distant government can nevertheless provide valued\nlocal benefits. The Charter will help connect government, especially local government and\nmunicipalities, with its citizens. Second, using community oversight over service provision\nthrough a high profile government program is the best bet for monitoring local level service\ndelivery in such a difficult environment. While neither objective will be achieved solely through\nthe Citizens’ Charter, the Charter builds upon NSP’s proven fiduciary mechanisms and popularity\nacross broad swathes of the Afghan public, making it a potentially valuable platform for supporting\ninclusive development in a country like Afghanistan.\n\n\n13. The Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project (CCAP) is one slice of the larger, ten-year\nCitizens’ Charter National Priority Program that will be supported through the government budget,\n\n\n4 Government of Afghanistan. 2014. _Realizing Self-Reliance: Commitments to Reform and Renewed Partnerships_,\npresented at the London Conference on Afghanistan in December 2014.\n\n\nPage 13 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nthe ARTF, and the World Bank/IDA. CCAP will support the first four-year phase of the Citizens’\nCharter.\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES**\n\n\n**A. PDO**\n\n\n14. **The Project Development Objective for the Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project is**\n**to improve the delivery of core infrastructure and social services to participating**\n**communities through strengthened Community Development Councils (CDCs).** These\nservices are part of a minimum service standards package that the Government is committed to\ndelivering to the citizens of Afghanistan.\n\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries**\n\n\n15. **Under its first four-year phase, CCAP will reach an estimated 8.5 million direct and**\n**indirect beneficiaries in select rural and urban areas** . Beneficiaries reside in all 34 provinces\nand approximately one-third of districts in each province, although coverage will be highly\ndependent upon security considerations. [5] In addition, four urban cities will be covered: Herat,\nMazar-i-Sharif, Kandahar, and Jalalabad.\n\n\n**C. PDO‐Level Results Indicators**\n\n16. The key results indicators for the PDO are:\n\n(a) Minimum of 8.5 million direct and indirect beneficiaries reached by CCAP;\n\n\n(b) Minimum of 50 percent of direct and indirect beneficiaries will be women;\n\n\n(c) Minimum of 9,000 communities in rural and urban areas receiving the stated\nminimum service standards. The minimum target is estimated at 9,000\ncommunities (8,600 rural and 400 urban) due to high risks of insecurity and\nfluctuating conditions. However, the overall coverage target is planned for 12,600\ntotal communities (12,000 rural and 600 urban communities); and\n\n\n5 MRRD and its FPs under NSP have recently conducted security assessments in 31 provinces and 152 districts to\ngauge the feasibility of operations at the community level. They have found that in two-thirds of the country (21,800\ncommunities), operations can continue; however the other one-third of the country (approximately 14,000\ncommunities) is deemed highly or extremely insecure.\n\n\nPage 14 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(d) Minimum of 10,500 CDCs/clusters/ _Gozars_ [6] able to plan, implement, monitor and\ncoordinate development activities as measured by an institutional maturity index. [7]\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**A. Project Components**\n\n\n17. **CCAP will seek to address key limitations of line agency efforts and NSP to date, and**\n**respond to financial constraints to national development investments.** First, it will bring\ntogether under one umbrella program the rural and urban community level work. Afghan cities\nare growing at a rapid rate, caused partially by an influx of returning refugees and internally\ndisplaced. The population of Afghan cities is expected to double within the next 15 years and by\n2060, one in every two Afghans will be living in cities. [8] The 2013-2014 Afghanistan Living\nConditions Survey estimates that 74 percent of the urban population lives in slums. Informal\nsettlements in major cities are growing while the number of poor – an estimated 29 percent of the\nurban population – do not have access to basic services. As urban areas have spread over the years,\nNSP and other projects have formed some 1,800 peri-urban and urban CDCs to increase\ncommunity participation, give voice to urban residents, and provide some vital services. The\nCCAP will build upon the ground work already being done in urban communities.\n\n18. **Second, consolidating service delivery under the Citizens’ Charter brings many**\n**advantages to Afghanistan’s development planning** . First and foremost, it will streamline the\nvarious parallel service delivery mechanisms amongst ministries and focus on key basic services\nneeded by communities. Afghanistan’s poor need to have access to a basic level of services in\norder to participate productively in the country’s economic development. The Charter aims to fill\nthese needs and focus investments exclusively on critical services such as clean drinking water,\nroad access and electricity. Second, by strengthening citizen engagement and monitoring in the\ndelivery of services such as education and health, it increases the chances of those services actually\nbeing delivered. Third, by transferring resources and responsibilities for local level infrastructure\nto communities, it frees up technical line agencies to focus upon larger, more technically\nsophisticated infrastructure. As evidenced during the past 14 years of NSP, communities feel more\nownership of their infrastructure. Despite their high rates of poverty, Afghan communities\ncontribute approximately 13 percent on average to NSP’s construction costs (30 percent on average\nin urban areas), and they can build infrastructure more cost effectively using local labor. The\nemphasis on labor-intensive works and use of local labor injects valuable liquidity and short-term\nemployment into poor rural areas. And lastly, community programs have had the best track record\nin Afghanistan for involving women in local decision-making.\n\n6 _Gozar_ is an urban neighborhood area-based organization structure at the sub-district level.\n7 Under NSP, a CDC Maturity Index was developed to assess the organizational and management capabilities of\nCDCs. This Maturity Index will be enhanced for use under the Citizens’ Charter.\n8 Government of Afghanistan. 2015. _The_ _State of Afghan Cities 2015_ . Kabul: Government of Afghanistan.\n\n\nPage 15 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan Living\nConditions Survey",
+ "confidence": 0.939433217048645,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 186
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7096736431121826,
+ "start": 185,
+ "end": 186
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9951992630958557,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013-2014",
+ "confidence": 0.9923186302185059,
+ "start": 181,
+ "end": 182
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "urban population",
+ "confidence": 0.9007558822631836,
+ "start": 192,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.7404295802116394,
+ "start": 294,
+ "end": 297
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9491755962371826,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.637708842754364,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Government of Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5468018054962158,
+ "start": 616,
+ "end": 619
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9755303859710693,
+ "start": 544,
+ "end": 545
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8532106280326843,
+ "start": 605,
+ "end": 606
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9519568085670471,
+ "start": 584,
+ "end": 585
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.5070070624351501,
+ "start": 571,
+ "end": 574
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Government of Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7853283882141113,
+ "start": 601,
+ "end": 604
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9069681167602539,
+ "start": 544,
+ "end": 545
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8167464733123779,
+ "start": 605,
+ "end": 606
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.7797267436981201,
+ "start": 584,
+ "end": 585
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n19. **This transition means that there will be increased emphasis on linking CDCs with**\n**local government institutions and ministries following a systems-based rather than project-**\n**based approach** . CDCs will focus much more in the future on monitoring and leveraging services\nfrom the various line ministry programs and other national priority programs. This role is\nconsistent with the 2006 CDC By-Law (See Box 1). In the past under NSP, there has been some\nincremental progress in using CDCs to coordinate service delivery across various sectors,\nespecially given the difficulties for all line ministries to reach communities. For example, the\nMinistry of Agriculture has worked closely with CDCs in several areas to deliver agricultural\nextension services to communities; in other areas, the Provincial Education Departments have\nworked hand-in-hand with CDCs in remote areas to construct schools and add facilities. Past\nstudies highlight the advantages of working through CDCs for geographical and social outreach\nespecially to remote and insecure areas, as well as to the most vulnerable groups. [9] However, those\nefforts have been ad-hoc and non-systematic. Moving forward, the Citizens’ Charter will build\nupon the community platform created through NSP over the past 14 years and strengthen the\npartnership between government and communities. CDCs will be the means by which citizens can\ndemand services, hold line agencies accountable, and ensure that the poorest and most vulnerable\ncan access services.\n\n20. **To provide improved services,** **the Citizens’ Charter will set a threshold of core**\n**infrastructure and services that the government will provide to all accessible communities**\n**over the next ten years** . The critical services include: clean drinking water, other rural\ninfrastructure as well as basic education and health services as explained below. The Charter is\nnot only about the delivery of services but also about the standards of service delivery citizens can\nexpect.\n\n21. **The Citizens’ Charter will be the first inter-ministerial program where Ministries**\n**collaborate on a single program in both rural and urban areas** . The Ministry of Finance (MoF)\nchairs the government’s working group on Citizens’ Charter with MRRD and the Independent\nDirectorate of Local Governance (IDLG) as lead implementing agencies for the rural and urban\ncomponents respectively. The working group also consists of the Ministry of Education (MoE),\nMinistry of Public Health (MoPH), and Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (MAIL).\n\n\n9 See Bradley et al., 2015.\n\n\nPage 16 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Box 1: Community Development Councils in Afghanistan**\n\n\nCommunity Development Councils or CDCs are community-based decision-making bodies,\ncomposed of both men and women who are democratically elected by their communities. While the\nAfghanistan Constitution calls for the election of village councils, these have not yet been constituted\nnor is it feasible to hold formal village level elections throughout the country currently given security\nand fiscal constraints. Thus, CDCs act as the subnational governance and development body to help\nthe government deliver services at the local level. A 2006 CDC By-Law passed by the President of\nAfghanistan forms the legal basis for CDCs. The By-Law defines CDCs as “the social and\ndevelopment foundation at the community level, responsible for the implementation and supervision\nof development projects, serving also as a liaison between communities, the Government and nongovernment organizations.” They also may have responsibilities for local dispute resolution amongst\ncommunity members as well as assisting with identity, birth, and marriage certification however\nthose responsibilities are highly variable across areas. Each Council includes an elected chairperson,\nvice-chair, treasurer and secretary who jointly prepare with their communities Community\nDevelopment Plans and investment proposals in a participatory and inclusive manner. Under NSP\nand other projects, CDCs were trained in financial management and book-keeping, project\nimplementation, and in basic principles of transparency, participation, and accountability. As with\n_gram panchayats_ in India, CDCs are composed of volunteers who are committed to helping their\ncommunities develop. Nationally, approximately 35 percent of the Council members are women.\nNSP’s impact evaluation found that the creation of gender-balanced CDCs increased female\nrepresentation in local institutions by 38 percentage points and increased the provision of governance\nservices particularly to women (Beath et al, 2013). Furthermore, another evaluation on aid\ndistribution by the same authors found that in villages where elected CDCs exist and manage\ndistributions, aid targeting of the poor improves.\n\nApproximately 35,000 CDCs have been formed in all rural areas of 34 provinces. In urban and periurban areas, some 1,800 CDCs have been formed. Cluster CDCs are groupings or federations of\nsmaller CDCs covering several communities to reach scale, especially for service delivery in health\nand education. In the urban domain, the CDCs – composed of up to 250 households - are organized\ninto _Gozars,_ which are clusters of five CDCs or up to 1,000 – 1,250 households.\n\n\n22. **Core design features of the Citizens’ Charter include** :\n\n(a) **CDCs/clusters are the linchpin of the Citizens’ Charter strategy.** They will\nbecome the central body for community development overseeing sectoral\nassociations or _shuras_ [10] as sub-committees. Education, health and agricultural\n_shuras_ will work more closely with CDCs/clusters to deliver the minimum package\nof services;\n\n(b) **Social inclusion will be much more heavily emphasized under the Charter.** As\nwitnessed in recent years, Afghanistan can experience rapid economic growth,\n\n\n10 _Shura_ is a consultative council or assembly.\n\n\nPage 17 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan Constitution",
+ "confidence": 0.7004055976867676,
+ "start": 53,
+ "end": 55
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9672872424125671,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2006",
+ "confidence": 0.732126772403717,
+ "start": 112,
+ "end": 113
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.7449504733085632,
+ "start": 234,
+ "end": 235
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Beath et al",
+ "confidence": 0.9009555578231812,
+ "start": 329,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "India",
+ "confidence": 0.7564790844917297,
+ "start": 268,
+ "end": 269
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.7827951312065125,
+ "start": 333,
+ "end": 334
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9295347929000854,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender-balanced CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5559161305427551,
+ "start": 306,
+ "end": 308
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Beath et al",
+ "confidence": 0.9883573651313782,
+ "start": 329,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.5761597156524658,
+ "start": 333,
+ "end": 334
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.7526517510414124,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8501808643341064,
+ "start": 564,
+ "end": 565
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8498290181159973,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nhowever that growth may not be shared. The project will be putting a much greater\nemphasis upon social inclusion of vulnerable groups including women, refugee\nreturnees IDPs and others. This will be done through enhanced community\nmapping and well-being exercises, needs identification and gap analysis, more\nintensive training of all staff and CDCs, clusters, and _Gozar_ Assemblies, and\nmonitoring and evaluation of poverty targeting and inclusion. The project will be\ndeveloping a more robust monitoring and reporting system building upon the\nexisting NSP management information system to track whether women, the poor\nand vulnerable groups such as returnees/IDPs are participating. The Government is\nalready working on modifying the operations manual and systems to emphasize\nmore social inclusion aspects;\n\n(c) **In addition to overseeing implementation of infrastructure projects, CDCs will**\n**monitor and report upon service delivery from other line ministries at the**\n**community level** (e.g. monitoring teacher attendance, health clinic hours and\nservices, etc.). Citizens will monitor and report upon services that communities\n_should be receiving_ under existing programs;\n\n(d) **The project will strengthen the service delivery capabilities and accountability**\n**of sub-national government, including provincial, district and municipality**\n**levels** . These entities will help select project locations, provide technical assistance\nand oversight to communities, and help resolve problems and grievances;\n\n(e) **Improved disaster risk prevention, mitigation and management measures will**\n**be included** . While NSP implemented some disaster risk management measures,\nthey were ad hoc and not program-wide. The Citizens’ Charter will strengthen the\ndisaster risk management aspects; and\n\n(f) **The project will also work with CDCs and communities to identify key local**\n**issues that can be solved without external resources** to ensure that development\nefforts do not create dependencies on outside funding and facilitation.\n\n23. **The service standards of the Citizens’ Charter and CCAP are:**\n\n**In Rural Areas:**\n\nApproximately 12,000 rural communities across 34 provinces will receive the following\nservices over the course of four years:\n\n(a) **Universal access to clean drinking water:** one water point per 25 households,\nproviding 25 liters of water per person per day;\n\n(b) **Rural infrastructure:** communities will have at least one of the following services\n\n(depending on gap analysis, community prioritization and accessibility):\n\n\nPage 18 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n - **Basic electricity:** 100W per household through solar, micro hydro, biogas or wind\n(only in areas that cannot be reached by the grid);\n\n - **Basic road access** : within two kilometers walking distance from nearest accessible\nrural road (accessible areas only); and\n\n - **Small-scale irrigation infrastructure** : this includes intakes (for secondary/tertiary\ncanals), water divider, water control gates, siphon, water reservoir up to 10,000 M3\ncapacity, rehabilitation or construction of small irrigation canal, protection wall,\ngabion wall, aqueducts, and super passage;\n\n(c) **Quality education in government schools** as part of MoE’s existing education\nstandards [11] . Citizens will monitor that:\n\n - Teachers have at least grade 12 education; and\n\n - Students have 24 hours per week of education in grade 1-3, 30 hours of\neducation in grade 4-6 and 36 hours of education in grade 7-12; and\n\n(d) **Delivery of basic package of health services,** as part of the MoPH’s existing\nhealth package [12] . Citizens will monitor the following services:\n\n - Health facilities will comply with required opening hours (8am to 4pm),\nrequired staffing requirements, and provide mandated services;\n\n - **Health post** : awareness on malaria, diarrhea, and acute respiratory infections,\nand referral to health facilities and health education;\n\n - **Health sub-center** : treatment of pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria, antenatal\ncare, family planning, tuberculosis case detection and referral, and\nimmunization services;\n\n - **Basic health center** : outpatient care, immunizations and maternal and newborn\ncare, and nutrition interventions; and\n\n - **Comprehensive health center** : antenatal, delivery, postpartum and newborn\ncare, routine immunization, nutrition interventions.\n\n_**In Urban Areas:**_\n\n24. **Urban areas require a different set of criteria and operating procedures because of**\n**the complex structure of community representation and population density, as well as**\n**different infrastructure needs.** Also, the urban areas have not had the years of experience with\nNSP as in rural areas. Lastly, urban infrastructure needs to be part of an overall municipal\ndevelopment plan with linkages to trunk infrastructure.\n\n11 It is recognized that not all communities have schools, given fiscal and security constraints. Citizens’ Charter monitoring of\nservice standards will take place only where these exist.\n12 It is recognized that not all communities have health-care facilities, given fiscal and security constraints. Citizens’ Charter\nmonitoring of service standards will take place only where these exist .\n\n\nPage 19 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n25. **CCAP will cover 600 CDCs and 120** _**Gozars**_ **in the four major provincial capitals.**\nEach urban CDC will receive a grant of $70,000 over the course of four years. Based upon the\nneeds and priorities of the community and the Community Development Plan, the community can\nchoose one or more services from the list below:\n\n(a) **Street upgrading and drainage:** includes concreting streets, sidewalks, drainage\nand tree planting along streets;\n\n(b) **Provision of potable water:** can include extension of existing municipal water\nnetwork, small water supply scheme or hand pump installation;\n\n(c) **Solid waste management:** solid waste management from the household level,\nwhich includes awareness raising, linked to existing municipal waste collection\nmechanisms;\n\n(d) **Household numbering** ; and\n\n(e) **Lighting/electricity:** can include extension of electrical grid, including installation\nof electrical transformers. Additionally households will be encouraged to install\nlights outside their homes.\n\n26. **Each** _**Gozar**_ **(composed of five CDCs or up to 1,000-1,250 households) will receive a**\n**total grant of US$200,000 over the course of four years.** Based on the needs and priorities of\nthe community and the Community Development Plans, the community can choose one or more\nservices from the menu below:\n\n(a) **Secondary road upgrading and readjustment:** includes concreting streets,\nsidewalks, drainage, and tree planting along streets;\n\n(b) **Provision of potable water:** extension of existing municipal water network;\n\n(c) **Park/recreation area/playground** for children and women;\n\n(d) **Solid waste management** : linkage for transfer of waste from designated waste site\nto dump site, facilitated by municipality;\n\n(e) **Lighting/electricity:** can include extension of electrical grid, including installation\nof electrical transformers. Additionally lights will be installed on secondary streets;\nand\n\n**(f)** **Livelihood projects for women** : a percentage of the _Gozar_ grant will be\ndesignated for women’s projects, particularly women’s economic activities with\nlinkages to relevant urban market demands in the area. The Citizens’ Charter will\ncoordinate these livelihood activities closely with the upcoming Government’s\n\n\nPage 20 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 1: Citizens’ Charter Service Standards**\n\n|Rural Areas|Urban Areas|\n|---|---|\n|**Access to Clean Drinking Water**
**Access to Rural Infrastructure.**Choice of:
Road access
Electricity (in areas not reached by grid)
Small-scale irrigation|**Access to Urban Infrastructure**. Choice of:
Potable water
Street upgrading and drainage
Lighting, electricity
Park, recreation area
Solid waste management
Household numbering
Livelihood projects for women|\n|**MoPH Health Standards**
Health facilities complying with required open hours, staffing, and mandated health services
In urban areas, pharmacies will be registered and meet basic MoPH requirements|**MoPH Health Standards**
Health facilities complying with required open hours, staffing, and mandated health services
In urban areas, pharmacies will be registered and meet basic MoPH requirements|\n|**MoE Education Standards**
Teachers with a least grade 12 education
Students will have 24 – 36 hours per week of education|**MoE Education Standards**
Teachers with a least grade 12 education
Students will have 24 – 36 hours per week of education|\n\n\n\nNational Priority Program for Women’s Economic Empowerment, to support women-only\nbusiness skills training centers, partner with existing, community-based women’s lending and\nbusiness groups to provide business and financial skills training, and access credit.\n\n\n27. **All infrastructure investments at the community and** _**Gozar**_ **levels will be validated by**\n**municipal authorities to ensure that they are consistent with municipal development plans** .\nUnder the current urban community projects, it is standard practice to have municipalities join the\ncommunity planning meetings and validate these plans so that there is no duplication and to\nimprove linkages with trunk infrastructure.\n\n28. **At the** _**Gozar**_ **level, communities will monitor to ensure:**\n\n\n(a) **Quality education in government schools** (same as in rural areas, noted above);\n\n(b) **Delivery of basic package of health services** (same as in rural areas, noted above);\n\n(c) **Private health facilities will provide health services according to agreed**\n**standards with MoPH.** All facilities must: be appropriately staffed; meet hygiene\nrequirements, including disposal of medical waste; provide adequate space and\nprivacy, particularly for female patients; and keep patient records; and\n\n\nPage 21 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(d) **Pharmacies will be registered and meet basic requirements stipulated by**\n**MoPH.** All pharmacies must: have a license that is visibly displayed, with licensed\npharmacists on duty; and clearly state and stamp the price of medication.\n\n29. **For agriculture, during project preparation, it was determined that it would be**\n**difficult to specify a service standard which would be applicable and meaningful across all**\n**34 provinces given the diverse agricultural climates and needs in the country.** And unlike\neducation and health, the existing agricultural projects are not national in scope. As with NSP,\nhowever, MAIL will work closely with CDCs and the agricultural sub-committees in specific areas\nof the country to provide extension services, train farmers, and assist with farm to market linkages\nand agricultural processing as part of existing MAIL projects.\n\n30. **Strengthening the Sectoral Response and Supply Side of Service Delivery** . Attaining\nthe minimum service standards as described above will require strong commitment and enhanced\ncoordination between communities and line ministries at the various levels. To make the “supplymeets-demand” cycle work, and concurrently with the implementation of the grants, the project\nwill build a strong monitoring and reporting mechanism into the operation, building upon NSP’s\nexisting systems. CDCs, assisted by FPs, will complete simple scorecards on the achievement of\nthe standards, and these scorecards will be discussed with local service providers (schools, health\nclinics, and district line ministries) and reported back to the district and provincial levels where\nresults will be reviewed at a forum chaired by the Governor. Semi-annual reports will also be sent\nto the Office of the President, MoF, and Citizens’ Charter national working group to monitor\nprogress, remove obstacles, and re-allocate resources if needed. The Office of the President has\nsignaled its strong commitment to this “flagship program” and will be monitoring it closely in the\nfuture. Second, the Citizens’ Charter will be tied to MoF’s current performance-based budgeting\nreforms whereby national priority programs and projects will be evaluated each year and resources\nallocated based upon good performance. While these budget reforms are part of the Government’s\nbroader national reform agenda and are not directly tied to the Citizens’ Charter, they do indicate\na desire by the government to more carefully monitor project performance and disbursement rates\nacross the development portfolio. Third, the project will strengthen the presence of engineers and\nmanagement units at the provincial, municipality and some district levels to provide technical\nassistance to CDCs, address grievances, and resolve issues. Strengthening district outreach to\ncommunities will increase the chances of services actually being delivered. Lastly, new training\nmodules, adapted from NSP’s training curricula and those of other community development\nprojects, are being developed to build the capacity of CDCs and provincial and local governments\nto provide services.\n\n31. **Selection of Project Locations for Phase One** . For equity reasons, CCAP will start in all\n34 provinces of the country and the four major city hubs (except for Kabul). Approximately onethird of districts were chosen in each province based upon two criteria: (i) security and accessibility\nof communities; and (ii) those communities that have not recently received a second round of\ngrants from NSP or other donor funding for similar activities. Using the aforementioned criteria,\nthe President’s Office, line ministries, and provincial governors and mayors have selected the\ndistricts. The other two-thirds of the country will be covered in subsequent phases, funding\n\n\nPage 22 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\npermitting. As for the urban municipalities, CCAP will cover 600 urban communities and 120\n_Gozars_ which represent approximately 50 percent of the total communities and _Gozars_ in those\nfour main cities. Communities in these cities will be chosen based upon access to basic\ninfrastructure and services. Kabul is not part of the first phase of CCAP because Kabul already\nhas several urban projects funded through separate sources. It is expected that Kabul will be\nincluded in the future, assuming funding becomes available.\n\n**Project Components**\n\n32. **Component 1: Service Standards Grants.** This component will support two types of\ngrants to CDCs:\n\n(a) **Rural Areas Service Standards Grants.** MRRD will have overall responsibility for\nthe implementation of these service standard grants in rural areas. Approximately\n12,000 rural communities (or some eight million residents) across 34 provinces will\nreceive assistance over the course of four years. This rural sub-component will support\nthe minimum service standards related to rural infrastructure (see earlier description).\nAllocations will be based upon an initial gap and needs assessment, undertaken by\ncommunities and FPs to determine the current status of the minimum service\nstandards in each community/cluster. Investments follow a _needs-based approach_\nrather than a uniform block grant allocation as previously practiced under NSP. The\ninvestments include water supply and a choice between basic road access, electricity,\nor small-scale irrigation. The average cost for all types of subprojects is expected to\nbe US$28,000. CDCs will implement most of these projects with technical assistance\nfrom MRRD’s provincial and district offices.\n\n(b) **Urban Areas Block Grants.** IDLG will have overall responsibility for the\nimplementation of the urban areas block grants. This sub-component supports grants\nto 600 urban CDCs and 120 _Gozars_ in four major cities (Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif,\nKandahar, and Jalalabad) to fund small infrastructure works in urban settings. These\nfour major cities are home to some 945,000 urban dwellers. The menu of options\nincludes street upgrading, parks, lighting, provision of potable water, solid waste\nmanagement arrangements, and women’s economic activities. Urban CDCs will\nreceive US$70,000 and _Gozars_ will receive US$200,000 over the course of four years.\nThis urban sub-component will support service delivery linkages between the CDC,\ncluster/ _Gozar_, urban district, and municipal levels. All urban CDC and _Gozar_\ndevelopment plans will be validated and be consistent with overall municipality plans.\nMunicipality authorities will participate in meetings regarding the CDC and GA plans\nto ensure proper linkages for more comprehensive urban development.\n\n33. **Component 2: Institution Building.** CCAP aims to build strong Afghan institutions from\nnational to local levels, capable of planning and managing their own development. This\ncomponent will support: capacity building; technical assistance; and community facilitation\nservices.\n\n\nPage 23 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(a) **Rural Areas.** MRRD will be responsible for this sub-component in rural areas.\nThis sub-component will support approximately 14 FP contracts, capacity building\nand training of provincial and district staff to oversee, monitor and report upon\nproject progress, Social Organizers, and engineering and technical support to\ncommunities across all 34 provinces.\n\n(b) **Urban Areas.** IDLG will be responsible for this sub-component in urban areas.\nThis sub-component supports the OC services for IDLG as well as approximately\nfour FP contracts, one for each of the cities. Capacity building and training of\nmunicipality staff to supervise, monitor and report upon project progress are also\nincluded in this sub-component.\n\n34. **Component 3:** **Monitoring and Knowledge Learning.** This component includes\nlearning activities from village to national levels, exchange visits across communities, especially\nfor women, and support for thematic studies and evaluations. MRRD will be in charge of the\nactivities described in this component for rural areas and IDLG will be in charge of activities in\nurban areas.\n\n(a) **Citizens’ monitoring and scorecard.** A core part of CCAP will be to strengthen\ncitizens’ monitoring and their ability to report problems at the same time as they are\nimplementing the rural and urban grants. The Project will develop simple citizens’\nscorecards to be completed by CDCs and Social Organizers to report upon the\nminimum service standards. CCAP will also track more closely through the\nscorecards, regular reporting and evaluations the participation of women, poor and\nvulnerable groups, such as returnees and IDPs, during the project cycle. Furthermore,\ntaking advantage of technology and high mobile access coverage in the country,\nCCAP will explore mobile applications for reporting and grievance redress. Second,\nthe project will innovate and use the satellite imagery of the existing ARTF third party\nmonitoring activity to validate infrastructure gaps and service delivery outputs. For\nexample, the presence of schools and irrigation canals in a sample number of areas\nwill be validated through satellite imagery against community monitoring reports.\nLastly, this component will support ways to strengthen a coordinated approach across\nline ministries’ monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, including at the community,\ndistrict and provincial levels, within government and with third party monitors. As\npart of the Government’s strong commitment to making the Citizens’ Charter operate\neffectively, the Office of the President and MoF will receive semi-annual progress\nreports on the achievement of the service standards so they can closely monitor\nprogress, assist with removing bottlenecks in service delivery, and allocate budgetary\nresources as needed.\n\n(b) **Studies and evaluations.** Several studies are planned related to service delivery,\nCDC institution strengthening, social inclusion, social accountability, and technical\nquality audits. The project will also explore the possibility of an evaluation to\n\n\nPage 24 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "thematic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.6515648365020752,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "citizens’\nscorecards",
+ "confidence": 0.9148339033126831,
+ "start": 269,
+ "end": 272
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "country",
+ "confidence": 0.5504664182662964,
+ "start": 336,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "satellite imagery",
+ "confidence": 0.9285174012184143,
+ "start": 358,
+ "end": 360
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community monitoring reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7491324543952942,
+ "start": 400,
+ "end": 403
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "semi-annual progress\nreports",
+ "confidence": 0.7849564552307129,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "evaluation",
+ "confidence": 0.7498548030853271,
+ "start": 546,
+ "end": 547
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nexamine the nexus between quality of service delivery and social cohesion, an underresearched area in the global conflict literature. Due to MRRD’s longer experience\nmanaging studies, sub-component 3 (b) on studies and evaluations has been included\nin MRRD’s portion of the budget although some studies will cover both rural and\nurban areas.\n\n35. **Component 4: Project Implementation and Management.** This component will support\nthe management and oversight of CCAP at the national, provincial and district levels in rural areas\nand the municipal management units in the four regional hub cities. MRRD will be responsible\nfor the implementation and management in rural areas, and IDLG will be in charge of urban areas.\nThe management teams will carry out the following functions: policy and operational planning;\nOperations Manual development; capacity building; management information and reporting\nsystems; grievance redress mechanisms; human resource management; communications; donor\nand field coordination, quality assurance on financial management and procurement; and\nsafeguards oversight.\n\n36. **Internally Displaced Persons and Returnees.** Afghanistan is the second largest refugee\nsource country in the world, with millions of refugees overseas and an increasing number of\nrefugees returning from Pakistan. The top three drivers of displacement are generally insecurity,\nlack of income opportunities and poor service provision. Over the years, NSP has served as a\ncommunity response mechanism for returnees, to provide short-term employment and services.\nDuring the early NSP years when there were large numbers of returnees, the project coordinated\nclosely with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other UN\nagencies to prioritize assistance to the districts and provinces with the most number of IDPs and\nreturnees. NSP I and II also had specific operational policies to assist these groups. For example,\nIDPs and returnees settling into communities could elect representatives to CDCs so that their\nvoices were heard and they could benefit from community subprojects. A 2012 independent\nevaluation by the University of York found that NSP was widely recognized by returnees and IDPs\nas the largest provider of community development projects from which they benefited. [13]\nAdditionally, an overwhelming majority of returning refugees and IDPs considered the\ndevelopment projects implemented by CDCs to be important in their reintegration, and the\nresulting short-term employment from these projects had a positive impact on their reintegration\ninto the communities. While much is to be learned and improved from past experience, CCAP\nwill use the lessons from NSP and other community projects in urban areas to inform response\nmechanisms as needed. (See Annex 4: NSP Achievements and Lessons Learned for more details).\nCCAP will provide the community platform in rural and urban areas to coordinate interventions.\nFor example, CDCs together with education _shuras_ can proactively assist children of IDP/returnee\nfamilies to enroll in school within a certain time period, or monitor grievances of IDPs/returnees\nin accessing basic services so that their specific needs are addressed. Initial funds of US$10 million\nare set aside in Component One to assist with quick responses.\n\n\n13 Post-War Reconstruction & Development Unit (PRDU), University of York. 2012. _The Study of NSP’s Impact on_\n_IDP/Refugee Returnee Reintegration in Afghanistan._ York: University of York.\n\n\nPage 25 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n37. **Disaster Risk Management.** Afghanistan is highly prone to intense and recurring natural\nhazards, including earthquakes, floods, flash floods, landslides, avalanches and droughts. Since\n1980, disasters caused by natural hazards have affected 9 million people and caused over 20,000\nfatalities in Afghanistan. While earthquakes cause the highest loss of life, drought affects the most\npeople and flooding causes the most economic damage. Most disaster risk management programs\nin Afghanistan support disaster preparedness and humanitarian responses. National community\ndevelopment programs provide a unique opportunity to significantly improve both local level\ndisaster-preparedness as well as cost-effective, rapidly mobilized post-disaster reconstruction.\n\n38. **CCAP will include a stronger focus on disaster risk reduction (DRR)** to ensure resilient\ncommunity infrastructure, greater sustainability in investments as well as more resilient\ncommunities. While FPs have been asked under earlier phases of NSP to train CDCs on DRR,\nthis was never done in a consistent and coherent manner across all communities. Also, important\nlessons have since been learned both within Afghanistan (from NGO partners working at the\ncommunity level) and in other countries, which could help inform a stronger approach in CCAP.\nSeveral activities will be carried out:\n\n(a) A national multi-hazard risk assessment was recently finalized and will provide\ncritical data and mappings to inform resilient infrastructure designs, differentiated\nby provincial and district-level risk profiles;\n\n(b) A training program for the MRRD and IDLG staff and engineers will be rolled out\nto raise awareness of resilient infrastructure aspects. Easy to use checklists will be\ndeveloped for provincial officials and FPs to use in their engagements with CDCs;\n\n(c) The Operations Manual will incorporate resilience aspects; and\n\n(d) A new CDC training module will be designed for rolling out a stronger and more\ncoherent DRR approach across the targeted 12,600 rural and urban communities.\n\n\n**B. Project Cost and Financing**\n\n\n39. Over the four-year period, it is proposed that the ARTF provides US$400 million while the\nWorld Bank/IDA provides US$100 million towards CCAP. The Government also plans to\ncontribute an estimated US$128 million from its internal budget to fund the service standards\ngrants.\n\n\nPage 26 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.6577581763267517,
+ "start": 179,
+ "end": 180
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6844583749771118,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.6175865530967712,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national multi-hazard risk assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9957315325737,
+ "start": 247,
+ "end": 251
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "data and mappings to inform resilient infrastructure designs",
+ "confidence": 0.7911195755004883,
+ "start": 258,
+ "end": 266
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8353067636489868,
+ "start": 210,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Operations Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.5277138352394104,
+ "start": 325,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5070157051086426,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2: Project Financing by Component (in US$ Million)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n**C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design**\n\n\n40. Below are some of the lessons learned over the past 14 years implementing the community\ndevelopment model in Afghanistan as well as some applicable global lessons for fragile and\nconflict environments.\n\n(a) **Partnering with communities and community representative bodies has**\n**proven to be an effective way for the Government to deliver services in**\n**Afghanistan.** Given its fiscal and capacity constraints, the Government cannot be\nexpected to deliver all services. CDCs have shown over the past 14 years of NSP\nthat if given control over resources, they are capable of planning and managing\ndevelopment activities. The community driven development (CDD) approach is\nalso more cost-effective and more sustainable because of: (i) lower transaction costs\ndue to community participation in development planning and executing\nsubprojects; and (ii) communities own the work and maintain the infrastructure.\n\n(b) **More attention needs to be paid to issues of equity and inclusion** . The design\nof NSP placed great emphasis on collective planning, implementing and building\n\n\nPage 27 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nNSP subprojects, and providing labor days for short-term employment. The next\nstep for this CDD model is to deepen the equity and inclusion dimensions so that\nwomen and the most vulnerable segments, such as returnees and IDPs, are included.\nThis can be achieved through more frequent Social Organizer visits, better mapping\nand poverty data collection, enhanced training and facilitation, and more focus\noverall on the vulnerable.\n\n(c) **Clustering of CDCs can improve service delivery but should not take place at**\n**the expense of the vulnerable.** The key issues when it comes to clustering are:\n(i) building a common identity and vision for CDCs that share different traits, such\nas varying levels of access to services, geographic location, or land ownership; (ii)\nensuring the mobilization and participation of women; and (iii) diminishing risks\nof elite capture in the decision-making process of CDC leadership. CCAP will need\nto take pro-active measures as mentioned above to ensure that the poor and\nvulnerable are not left out of the decision-making process.\n\n(d) **There is a need to coordinate more closely with line agencies and district and**\n**provincial levels for effective service delivery.** Communities can help mobilize\nlabor and report upon service delivery, but line agencies must be responsible for\nensuring actual service delivery and responding to needs beyond a community’s\ncontrol and mandate. Looking at global case studies where large-scale poverty\nreduction has been effective, supply must meet community demand. In other\nwords, the government must be able to respond to deliver services effectively. NSP\nwas never designed to link to sub-national governance structures, but instead it was\nvertically organized with lines of reporting from the field to Kabul. As a result,\nline ministry presence at the district level is uneven, the interface of citizens with\nthe state is absent at the district level, and channels of communication between local\nlevel government units and CDCs are not regular. Under the Citizens’ Charter,\nMRRD and IDLG will decentralize more staff to the provincial, district and\nmunicipality levels where security permits, establish greater linkages with\nCDCs/clusters, and set up a citizens’ scorecard system to monitor service delivery.\n\n(e) **Global lessons working in fragile and conflict environments** . The World Bank\nand the Government have learned important lessons from past experience in\nAfghanistan, as well as from global experience working in fragile and conflict\nsituations. The World Development Report (WDR) 2011 emphasizes that\nperfection should not be the enemy of progress and it is important to move forward\nand find pragmatic and \"best-fit\" approaches to the country's political realities,\ninstitutional capacity, and levels of insecurity. [14] Blueprint approaches are not\nrealistic given fluctuating security situations. The WDR 2011 also underlines that\nmulti-sectoral community empowerment programs are important to build statesociety relations from the bottom up and to deliver development improvements in\n\n14 World Bank. 2011. _World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development_ . Washington, DC:\nWorld Bank.\n\n\nPage 28 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nfragile and conflict-prone environment. It illustrates how CDD approaches can\nincrease citizen trust in institutions and contribute to longer-term institution\nbuilding. Attributes, such as participatory planning and decision-making,\ncooperation between local authorities and elected community committees, and\ncommunity control of funds, mean the programs can signal a change in the attitude\nof the state to communities, even before physical projects are completed. They can\nthereby enhance state-society relations, increase citizens’ trust in institutions, and\ncontribute to longer-term institution building. The Citizens’ Charter and its\npredecessor, NSP, build upon these principles and methodologies.\n\n(f) **Finally, there is broad recognition of the limitations in the model of providing**\n**single large block grants to communities over a period of 10-12 years under**\n**NSP.** The periodicity does not permit for institutional strengthening that can come\nwith repeated grants. Smaller, but regular grants support better institutional\nstrengthening. However, the fiscal constraints the government faces currently limit\nthe likelihood of such repeater grants across the country. Therefore, the broader\nelements of Citizen Charter such as a needs-based approach to investments and\ndeepening the participatory planning and monitoring roles for CDCs will help\nmitigate the institution-building challenge.\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n41. **The Citizens’ Charter is an inter-ministerial effort of the Government to make service**\n**delivery more effective and citizen-responsive in Afghanistan.** At the national level, the\nCitizens’ Charter and CCAP will be under the responsibility of the Government’s High Council\nfor Governance, chaired by the President and composed of the Ministers of Finance, Justice,\nInterior, Women’s Affairs, MRRD, IDLG as well as the Attorney General, Supreme Court and\nCivil Service Commission. The High Council serves as the oversight body for all National Priority\nPrograms (NPPs) and provides broad strategic direction for the NPPs.\n\n42. **The** **National Citizens’ Charter/CCAP Working Group** consists of Ministers from the\nconcerned ministries who are directly concerned with the implementation of the Citizens’\nCharter/CCAP: MoF as Chair, MRRD as Secretary, with IDLG, MoPH, MoE, and MAIL as\nmembers. The purpose of this inter-ministerial working group is to guide overall strategic and\npolicy directions, and oversee the progress of the Citizens’ Charter. This group is supported by a\nsecretariat based out of MoF’s Policy Department to coordinate activities and ensure smooth\nimplementation. MoF will have the overall oversight and reporting responsibility given that actual\nimplementation under CCAP will involve multiple agencies and the Citizens’ Charter is tied to the\nGovernment’s efforts to strengthen performance-based budgeting. Sub-committees under the\n\n\nPage 29 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nsecretariat include monitoring and reporting, communications (both led by MRRD), and financial\nmanagement (led by MoF).\n\n43. **MRRD and IDLG will be the implementing agencies for rural and urban areas**\n**respectively.** MRRD will have project units at the national and provincial levels, with some\noutposts for remote districts. IDLG will work through municipality offices in the four main cities.\nA maximum of 14 FPs will be recruited for rural areas and a maximum of four FPs for urban areas.\nIn terms of administrative capacity and feasibility, MRRD has built its capacity over the years\nthrough NSP and other rural development national programs; the estimated 12,000 rural\ncommunities to be covered under CCAP represent only 40 percent of the communities covered\nunder the current NSP III.\n\n**Rural Areas**\n\n44. **The Citizens’ Charter is expected to cover approximately 36,000 rural communities**\n**over the period of ten years.** In the first phase of four years, it is expected to cover some 12,000\nrural communities through CCAP.\n\n45. **Rural CDCs.** The CDC will be established through democratic election processes to be\noutlined in the Citizens’ Charter Operations Manual and will be similar to the hamlet-based\nelection process used in NSP. Elected CDCs will have a term of four years in office. Elected\nmembers of the CDC will then elect the CDC’s office bearers: the Chairperson, the Vice\nChairperson, the Secretary and the Treasurer. Since the last elections were held in 2012/2013,\nmost rural areas will require new elections as part of the community activities cycle. The elections\nthemselves will take just a few days but there will be preparation work required ahead of time for\nan accurate population count and community awareness campaigns.\n\n46. **CDC Clusters in Rural Areas.** To better meet the spatial dimensions of service delivery,\nespecially for education and health, communities will be organized into sub-district clusters based\nupon pre-defined criteria related to accessibility in terms of proximity to physical infrastructure,\nservices and natural resources, and taking into account women’s mobility and access. During\nproject preparation, the government has formulated some guidelines for clustering based upon the\nprevious NSP pilots.\n\n47. While exact numbers will be determined based on final application, it is estimated that\neach cluster will include an average of five communities, and hence the 12,000 communities will\nform some 2,400 rural clusters.\n\n**Urban Areas**\n\n48. **Urban Component of the Citizens’ Charter** _**.**_ With the exception of Kabul, municipalities\nare accountable to IDLG, which reports to the President’s Office according to Presidential Decree\n73 of August 2007 (the Kabul Mayor also reports directly to the President). IDLG is also part of\nthe separate Urban National Priority Program working group that is coordinated by the Ministry\n\n\nPage 30 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.5475206971168518,
+ "start": 132,
+ "end": 133
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural\ncommunities",
+ "confidence": 0.9070120453834534,
+ "start": 145,
+ "end": 147
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.6427415013313293,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Rural Areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7526798844337463,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural communities",
+ "confidence": 0.516447126865387,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.5746071934700012,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 164
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "hamlet-based\nelection process",
+ "confidence": 0.6172441244125366,
+ "start": 259,
+ "end": 262
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Rural Areas",
+ "confidence": 0.6188730597496033,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2012/2013",
+ "confidence": 0.6315286755561829,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Elected CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.6662747859954834,
+ "start": 266,
+ "end": 268
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "population count",
+ "confidence": 0.5384539365768433,
+ "start": 354,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7578434944152832,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8500618934631348,
+ "start": 389,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.5243024826049805,
+ "start": 443,
+ "end": 444
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "guidelines for clustering",
+ "confidence": 0.7443830966949463,
+ "start": 436,
+ "end": 439
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.513751208782196,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8828591704368591,
+ "start": 389,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDLG",
+ "confidence": 0.5874404311180115,
+ "start": 525,
+ "end": 526
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nof Urban Development Affairs (MUDA). The MUDA has the primary policy-making and urban\nplanning role for all urban areas in Afghanistan, except Kabul.\n\n49. **Urban CDCs** . In urban areas, CDCs represent up to 250 households. Functions are similar\nto those in the rural areas in terms of community elections, women’s participation as CDC\nmembers and office bearers, mobilization, planning, decision-making, implementation of smallscale infrastructure and monitoring and evaluation. Under the Citizens’ Charter, they will help to\nreport upon the key standards, especially education and health. As spatial planning is an essential\npart of comprehensive urban development, work at the _Gozar_ and community levels needs to be\nintricately tied to higher level planning at the district level, especially related to tenure security\nimprovements. One advantage of the CDC approach is to build a strong urban community platform\nto help provide organized, urban residents’ feedback to macro-level planning and development.\n\n50. _**Gozar**_ **Assemblies (GAs).** GAs are clusters of CDCs in urban areas, composed of an\naverage of five CDCs or up to 1,000-1,250 households. After GA establishment, the participating\ncommunities within a GA will come together to elect a GA Chair ( _Wakil Gozar_ ), Deputy, Finance\nand Secretary. _Gozars_ will play similar roles as CDCs but for a larger geographical space and for\nhigher levels of planning. The GA will have two kinds of sub-committees, those that extend to all\nline ministries, such as operations and maintenance, project management, etc., and those specific\nto the mandates of the line ministries under the Citizens’ Charter, such as education, health, etc.\nSub-committee membership will include both GA and non-GA members and will be outlined in\nthe Citizens’ Charter Operations Manual.\n\n51. **Public Administration Reforms within MRRD and IDLG.** As with other ministries in\nAfghanistan, MRRD and IDLG are both undertaking internal public administration reforms as part\nof the Capacity Building for Results (CBR) Program. The CBR Program is an institutional\ndevelopment and public administration reform program launched in 2012 by the Government and\nfunded by the ARTF through the national budget. MRRD and IDLG will be strengthening their\ncore civil service human resources and restructuring to eliminate duplication of functions. For\nMRRD, nine directors of Finance, Internal Audit, Procurement, M&E, Planning, Human\nResources, Training, Engineering, and Administration, along with all 34 provincial directors are\nexpected to be civil servants and supported through the CBR Program. They will play important\noversight roles for the Citizens’ Charter. For IDLG, six directors and subdirectors at the\nheadquarters (HQ) as well as four assistant mayors and heads of departments in each of the four\ncities will be civil servants and CBR-supported.\n\n52. A detailed description of the implementation arrangements for both MRRD and IDLG for\nCCAP and phasing of activities are presented in Annex 2. An Operations Manual will describe the\ndetailed Project implementation and institutional arrangements as well as subproject eligibility and\nprocessing. The Manual is under preparation and is a condition of effectiveness.\n\n\nPage 31 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n53. **The Citizens’ Charter Working Group has formed a Monitoring and Evaluation**\n**(M&E) Sub-committee to review best practices across the ministries and coordinate local**\n**level monitoring.** The M&E Sub-committee will design simple community scorecards based\nupon the Citizens’ Charter service standards to monitor service delivery to communities. CDCs\nwith the assistance of Social Organizers and FPs will complete the scorecards every six months.\nThese scorecards will be discussed with local service providers (schools, health clinics, and district\nline ministries) and reported back to the district and provincial levels where results will be\ndiscussed at a forum chaired by the Governor. These reports will be sent semi-annually to the\nOffice of the President and MoF for review and comments. CCAP will explore with the\nAfghanistan Information and Communications Technology Sector Development Project the\npossibility of using mobile technology for community scorecard reporting. With 85 percent of the\ncountry currently having mobile access, the Citizens’ Charter can use the available mobile\napplication technology to expedite citizens’ reporting and grievance redress. Performance\nindicators for gender, including gender-disaggregated data and citizen engagement, have been\nincorporated into the project’s Results Framework (see Section VII).\n\n54. **CCAP will also take advantage of the third-party independent monitoring**\n**arrangements under the ARTF.** The third party monitors will provide critical data and a level\nof additional evidence from the field to complement the government monitoring systems and Bank\nmissions. CCAP will make use of their reviews of infrastructure quality as well as their satellite\nimagery data in order to verify infrastructure assets and gaps based upon the initial needs\nassessment. The third party monitors will also review the achievement of the service standards,\nsocial inclusion dimensions, and CDC organizational maturity.\n\n55. **Evaluation and Studies** . The Citizens’ Charter provides a rich environment for testing\nvarious hypotheses important for development effectiveness in Afghanistan as well as other fragile\nand conflict situations. The Government together with the World Bank have discussed eight\nstudies, some to be funded through CCAP and others through additional government resources.\nDue to the purposive selection methodology by which locations were chosen for CCAP, a\nrandomized impact evaluation may not be possible. However, several unique evaluations are\nplanned and there is room to potentially undertake some nested experimental studies on citizens’\nmonitoring and reporting.\n\n\nPage 32 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community scorecards",
+ "confidence": 0.8915268778800964,
+ "start": 78,
+ "end": 80
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "M&E Sub-committee",
+ "confidence": 0.6082950234413147,
+ "start": 71,
+ "end": 75
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.974105715751648,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender-disaggregated data",
+ "confidence": 0.7003316283226013,
+ "start": 234,
+ "end": 236
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9737531542778015,
+ "start": 178,
+ "end": 179
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "satellite\nimagery data",
+ "confidence": 0.6573842167854309,
+ "start": 322,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5077821612358093,
+ "start": 260,
+ "end": 261
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 3: Possible Evaluations for Citizens’ Charter National Program**\n\n|Col1|Evaluation Areas|Funded through|\n|---|---|---|\n|1|Improved service delivery evaluation|CCAP|\n|2|CDCs/clusters/_Gozars_ Study|CCAP|\n|3|Gender study|CCAP|\n|4|Technical quality of infrastructure|CCAP or through ARTF
3rd party monitoring|\n|5|Service delivery and its relationship to state legitimacy|CCAP|\n|6|Conflict and fragility study|CCAP or Government
resources|\n|7|Local economic development and value chains|Government|\n|8|Public financial management at the local level|Government|\n\n\n\n_Note: See Annex 2 for details_\n\n\n**C. Sustainability**\n\n\n56. **CCAP’s strategy for addressing issues of sustainability is to work on three fronts,**\n**institutional, financial and technical.** First, the project will build institutional capacity at the\nvarious levels, from the national level to provincial, district and community levels. The Capacity\nBuilding for Results (CBR) Program plays an important part in ensuring that MRRD and IDLG\nhave a highly qualified group of professional civil servants undertaking core ministerial functions\nat the national, provincial, and municipal levels. Provincial and district levels will play a much\nmore prominent role than in the past to make service delivery more responsive to citizens. The\nrole of the district will be essential to bring the “face of the state” closer to communities. CDCs\nand _shuras_ will be intensively trained on their roles and functions and project implementation,\nincluding financial management and procurement.\n\n57. **In terms of financial sustainability, the project aims to streamline service delivery to**\n**reduce duplication and inefficiencies** . Standard unit costs for infrastructure (especially water\npoints, roads, irrigation and electricity) have been reviewed across different projects in\nAfghanistan (both World Bank/ARTF-funded as well as other donors) during CCAP preparation\nto ensure they are realistic and cost-effective. The full costs of the Citizens’ Charter first phase\nare already incorporated into the government's budget plan, including its four year forward\nestimates. This budget will be approved by the parliament in early 2017. The overall ten-year\nprojected plan for the Citizens’ Charter has been reviewed by MoF and the World Bank and has\n\n\nPage 33 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nbeen found to be fiscally feasible in line with the government’s medium-term revenue generation\nand growth projections as well as continued donor assistance at levels consistent with the past two\nyears. As for technical quality and sustainability of infrastructure works, CCAP will place greater\nemphasis than the past on operations and maintenance of small-scale infrastructure and develop\nnew training modules on this topic. Past technical audits of the NSP infrastructure have found that\nroutine maintenance costs of water points, roads, irrigation and electricity schemes are usually\nborne by the communities through collective user fees or pooled voluntary labor. The NSP\nMaintenance Cash Grants of approximately US$10,000 also provided sufficient support to\nmaintain public infrastructure works over the past year. As mentioned earlier, CCAP will also be\nstrengthening its disaster resilience infrastructure designs and training.\n\n\n**D. Role of Partners**\n\n\n58. The Citizens’ Charter will be funded through the World Bank/IDA and the ARTF. During\npreparation, the Government and World Bank teams have met with the ARTF donors as well as\nseveral UN agencies, European Union, bilateral donors, and NGOs who have expressed interest in\ncoordinating with the Citizens’ Charter.\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n**A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks**\n\n\n59. **The overall risk rating for this project is high due to the country’s fragile security**\n**environment, limited government capacity especially at the sub-national levels, overall fiscal**\n**uncertainties and the declining foreign aid budget.** Furthermore, the project runs the risk of\nover-promising to its citizens, which may further exacerbate state-society tensions. Given a unity\ngovernment, the risk of political instability remains high both from within the coalition and from\noutside. The government is committed to reforms, improving governance, and tackling corruption,\nbut these actions could also increase political uncertainty.\n\n60. **The deteriorating security situation poses the largest risk to the project.** Fragility and\nconflict continue to be critical threats to personal safety, public service delivery, and private\ninvestments. With civilian casualties on the rise and decreasing accessibility of civil servants to\ndistricts, the project will need to adjust to fluctuating and uncertain circumstances. Growing\ninsecurity in parts of the country will mean changes to the way development is delivered.\nIncreasingly local communities will be the arbiters of their own development. They will need to\nbroker development space with insurgent groups to allow services to be delivered. This will be\neasier in some rather than other areas depending on the level of ongoing violent contestation\nbetween groups. Understanding these local conflict dynamics and how local political settlements\nimpact development will become increasingly important for effective service delivery, and even\n\n\nPage 34 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nfor allowing development to take place at all. Within this new space, as access by civil servants\nreduces, the role of the intermediary agents, whether NGO or private contractor, will become\nincreasingly critical in mobilizing communities, monitoring projects and articulating the needs of\ncommunities upwards to service providers. [15]\n\n61. **The project will need to adjust to the fluctuating security situation in several ways** .\nFirst, the Government has selected to work in areas of the country that are secure and currently\naccessible. However given the changing security landscape, some areas may become inaccessible\nso the situation will need to be closely monitored at the provincial and district levels and\ncoordinated with the line ministries and FPs. The shifting security conditions may also delay the\nspeed of implementation as precautionary measures are taken to ensure the safety of staff and\nnegotiate access to certain areas. To some extent, risk levels will be mitigated through the selection\nof more peaceful districts but the risks cannot be ruled out entirely. Lessons from other CDD\nprojects around the world point to ways of building community capacities to support local level\ndispute resolution, provide deliberative forums for issues to be discussed, and opportunities to\ninterface with government officials and influential local actors. The project provides grievance\nredress and other citizen engagement mechanisms to potentially diffuse disagreements and\ncomplaints.\n\n62. **Corruption and rent-seeking behavior pose another high risk to project**\n**implementation.** Afghanistan ranks as the third most corrupt country in the world in\nTransparency International’s 2015 corruption perceptions index. Sub-national institutions are\nparticularly weak so independent monitoring by third parties, national level oversight, strong M&E\nsystems, transparent project information, and grievance redress mechanisms will be critical.\nCitizen engagement aspects of service delivery monitoring are built into the project design.\nFinancial and procurement risks are described in their respective sections below and in Annex 2.\n\n63. **There is also a risk that CDCs and CDC Clusters are captured by the elite and**\n**decisions do not benefit the poor and vulnerable.** In NSP, there were some reported cases of\nelite capture especially when the socialization and election process of CDCs was rushed or not\nmanaged well. This risk is not unique to Afghanistan or developing countries, and in fact, a 2013\nfield experiment in 500 Afghan villages showed that in villages where elected CDCs exist and\nmanage aid distribution, aid was targeted for the poor. [16] Nevertheless, there is no doubt that more\ncan be done to make community processes more socially inclusive. To the extent possible, CCAP\nwill mitigate risks of elite capture or social exclusionary practices through greater involvement of\nordinary people in CDC sub-committees, improved community socialization and planning\nprocesses, budgeting sufficient time to train CDCs and communities, improved training modules,\nmore communication materials and information campaigns, and regular monitoring of social\ninclusion indicators. While elite capture cannot be eliminated, the project can certainly encourage\nmore inclusive community practices.\n\n15 World Bank. Forthcoming. _Afghanistan: Country Partnership Framework._ Washington, DC: World Bank.\n16 Beath, Andrew, Fotini Christia, and Ruben Enikolopov. 2013. _Randomized impact evaluation of Afghanistan's_\n_national solidarity program_ . Washington DC: World Bank.\n\n\nPage 35 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7244510054588318,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8193795680999756,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "2015 corruption perceptions index",
+ "confidence": 0.5781954526901245,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 306
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8063822388648987,
+ "start": 439,
+ "end": 440
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9883081316947937,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9465870261192322,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.6003801226615906,
+ "start": 425,
+ "end": 426
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "project information",
+ "confidence": 0.667982816696167,
+ "start": 330,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Transparency International",
+ "confidence": 0.5737732648849487,
+ "start": 298,
+ "end": 300
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6024360656738281,
+ "start": 286,
+ "end": 287
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.539456307888031,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.8163642287254333,
+ "start": 407,
+ "end": 408
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5024974942207336,
+ "start": 439,
+ "end": 440
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.8565894365310669,
+ "start": 381,
+ "end": 382
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5737490653991699,
+ "start": 503,
+ "end": 504
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6148919463157654,
+ "start": 577,
+ "end": 579
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9531322121620178,
+ "start": 614,
+ "end": 615
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.6637908816337585,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 609
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "social\ninclusion indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9383810758590698,
+ "start": 555,
+ "end": 558
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5387977361679077,
+ "start": 614,
+ "end": 615
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.8258956670761108,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n64. **Climate change and disaster risks.** In compliance with IDA17 priority commitments,\nthis IDA-supported operation has been screened to identify and if relevant, address any potential\nshort- and long-term climate change and disaster risks. The risk screening suggests an overall low\nrisk rating for the project outcome. Therefore, achievement of the PDO defined for this operation\nis unlikely to be affected by climate change and disaster risks. However, as mentioned earlier,\nCCAP will be incorporating several disaster risk mitigation measures including enhanced training\nfor staff on disaster risk prevention and mitigation and a review of more disaster-resilient\ninfrastructure designs. The potential impact on key component(s) due to exposure from hazards\nis modulated by the project's non-physical components (enabling and capacity building activities).\nA national multi-hazard risk assessment was recently finalized by the World Bank's South Asia\nDisaster Risk Management Team, which will provide critical data and mappings to inform the\nproject’s resilient infrastructure designs, differentiated by the provincial and district-level risk\nprofiles. These capacity building measures could increase preparedness and longer-term resilience\nand reduce the project’s risks.\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A. Economic and Financial (if applicable) Analysis**\n\n\n65. **The proposed CCAP builds upon NSP’s accomplishments in strengthening the**\n**capacities of CDCs across the country and delivering much needed infrastructure services**\n**in rural areas.** Since 2003, NSP has funded some 82,000 subprojects to improve access to\ntransport, water supply and sanitation, irrigation, electricity and schools in approximately 35,000\ncommunities in all 34 provinces. Return on investments has been high. In terms of infrastructure\nrates of return, an external study of NSP III found positive economic rates of return (ERR),\nespecially for water, irrigation and power subprojects (the same infrastructure types supported\nunder CCAP). The overall ERR was 41.4 percent for the four main subproject investments. Under\nNSP II, the ERR analysis conducted as part of NSP II Implementation Completion Report (ICR)\nconcluded a weighted ERR for sampled subprojects of 69.3 percent while the financial rate of\nreturn was calculated at over 100 percent across a small sample. [17]\n\n66. **Furthermore, an independent impact evaluation of NSP found that the program has**\n**led to a number of important multiplier effects and positive impacts for women**, in terms of\nincreased male acceptance of female participation in public life and broad-based improvements in\nwomen's lives, including increases in participation in local governance, access to counseling, and\nmobility. These and other economic, institutional, and social impacts of NSP further drove\nincreases in girls' school attendance and in women's access to medical services, as well as\nimproved economic perceptions and optimism among women. [18]\n\n17 World Bank. 2012. National Solidarity Program II - Implementation Completion and Results Report. Washington,\nDC: World Bank.\n18 Beath et al., 2013; Independent Evaluation Group. 2013. _Evaluation of World Bank Programs in Afghanistan, 2002-_\n_11_ . Washington DC: World Bank.\n\n\nPage 36 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Cost Effectiveness Analysis**\n\n\n67. **Compared to the cost structure of other projects in Afghanistan with significant**\n**infrastructure investments, NSP’s cost structure is competitive.** More specifically,\ninvestments in basic services and infrastructure make up on average 69 percent of total project\ncosts across the projects surveyed in a 2015 Afghanistan study as compared to NSP’s 73 percent\nallotment for infrastructure block grants. [19] In terms of unit costs, a 2014 assessment of key NSP\nsectors by expenditure (roads, power, irrigation and water within the rural development sector)\nshowed that NSP was at the lower end or within benchmark norms relative to other projects. [20] For\nexample, the average cost of NSP’s basic access road investments is US$7,471, which rises to\naround US$13,626 for graveled solutions, whereas benchmark comparators lie between\nUS$11,000-45,000. [21] Comparing cost structures internationally with similar large-scale CDD\nprograms, NSP’s costs were found to be comparable as well. [22] Lastly, based upon the experience\nof NSP and other community programs over the past 14 years in Afghanistan, communities\ncontribute 13 to 30 percent of total costs in order to access these services.\n\n68. **Building upon the recent NSP cost analyses, the Citizens’ Charter preparation team**\n**reviewed the unit costs and cost structure for the main infrastructure types, comparing those**\n**with other similar programs in the country.** For budgeting purposes, the range of actual\ninvestment costs for water points, roads, irrigation, and renewable energy were reviewed (from\nNSP and other similar programs) and calculated, factoring in a contingency for possible overruns.\nFor the urban component, the budget costs were calculated based upon ongoing experience from\nNSP, UN-Habitat and other urban programs. Component 1, the investment component (inclusive\nof the government’s contribution), represents 67 percent of the total project costs which is\ncomparable to other project ratios in Afghanistan. This is equivalent to approximately US$10 per\ncapita per year over the five-year period. Costs related to institution building (Component 2) –\nrepresenting 21 percent of the overall total budget - such as FP, OC, Social Organizers and\nengineering support were also found to be reasonable and consistent with previous unit costs under\nNSP.\n\n\n19 See Bradley et al., 2015. The other projects included National Priority Programs, such as: (a) the Emergency\nIrrigation Rehabilitation Project; (b) its successor the Irrigation Restoration and Development Project; (c) the National\nRural Access Project, and (d) the Strengthening Health Activity for the Rural Poor Project, and (e) the Health Action\nin Transition Project.\n20 Atos Consulting. 2014. _National Solidarity Programme: Phase III Financial and Economic Analysis Final Report_ .\nKabul: Atos Consulting. The benchmarks used for the comparison come from MRRD (NERAP and CARD-F\nprojects), the World Bank’s Rocks Database, the Water Project Organization, Oxfam, and UNICEF.\n21 Ibid., p.22.\n22 Ibid.\n\n\nPage 37 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**B. Technical**\n\n\n69. **The World Bank has found the technical design for CCAP to be technically feasible**\n**overall and appropriate for the context of Afghanistan.** Given the limits of government’s reach\nand its current fiscal constraints, it makes sense for government to build upon the community\nplatform built over 14 years with the successful NSP and to partner with communities and FPs to\ndeliver a core set of services more effectively and efficiently. And changing from a needs-based\napproach to investments rather than uniform block grants allows the government to focus its efforts\ntowards a minimum package of core activities and services. During project preparation, the World\nBank and the Citizen’s Charter Working Group reviewed available rural infrastructure surveys and\nadministrative and project data from the various line agencies to assess infrastructure needs and\ndetermine service standards. The team has also looked at other international examples of largescale CDD programs involving “front-line service delivery” and similar Citizens’ Charter types of\nprojects, especially in India, Philippines, Korea, Indonesia and Cambodia. The current\ngovernment has expressed a strong commitment to making front-line service delivery work, and\nbringing government closer to citizens. Afghanistan provides a useful setting for testing this\nmodel.\n\n\n**C. Financial Management**\n\n\n70. **The fiduciary arrangements in MRRD and IDLG have been assessed and found**\n**adequate for the purposes of the project** . The overall project financial management (FM) risk,\nafter applying the risk mitigation measures, is rated as _**SUBSTANTIAL**_ .\n\nThe FM arrangements are at two levels—the central level and the implementing agency level.\nCountry systems are used for budgeting, accounting, funds flow, internal audit, and external audit.\n\n\n71. **At the central level, accounting and audit functions for the proposed project will be**\n**undertaken by MoF and the Supreme Audit Office (SAO) respectively**, with technical\nassistance supported under the ARTF-financed Public Financial Management Reform Project\n(PFMRP) II. The project activities will be implemented by MRRD and IDLG. At the implementing\nagencies’ level, the overall responsibility for project FM will rest with the head of MRRD and\nIDLG finance departments, and the day-to-day functions will be carried out through the focal\nfinance department staff identified for the project. In MRRD, these focal staff will be from NSP.\nWhile the MRRD finance staff has prior experience of working on the World Bank funded projects,\nIDLG staff will be provided the necessary training to familiarize them with World Bank FM and\ndisbursement requirements.\n\n72. **Project transactions will be recorded in the Afghanistan Financial Management**\n**Information System (AFMIS) by MoF.** Simultaneously, MRRD and IDLG will maintain\nsubsidiary books of records for the project segregated for each grant, and will prepare interim\nfinancial reports (IFRs) on a quarterly basis. The responsibility for submission of consolidated\nIFRs within 45 days from the end of the quarter will rest with the Citizens’ Charter dedicated unit\nwithin MoF’s Policy Department. The project will follow the Afghan fiscal year (December 21 to\n\n\nPage 38 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rural infrastructure surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.9888245463371277,
+ "start": 154,
+ "end": 157
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.533499538898468,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 29
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6271602511405945,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country systems",
+ "confidence": 0.5055654644966125,
+ "start": 331,
+ "end": 333
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "interim\nfinancial reports",
+ "confidence": 0.6340709924697876,
+ "start": 557,
+ "end": 560
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.5354253053665161,
+ "start": 561,
+ "end": 562
+ },
+ "author": {
+ "text": "MoF",
+ "confidence": 0.5888645052909851,
+ "start": 594,
+ "end": 595
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nDecember 20) for project accounting and reporting. As CCAP is similar to NSP in terms of the\nactivities to be implemented, the systems (for grants and other expenditures) used under NSP will\nbe adopted and modified for CCAP within MRRD and will also be replicated in IDLG. The\nMRRD finance staff will provide training to the focal IDLG staff in operating and maintaining\nthese systems. The FM focal persons will be responsible for facilitating the internal and external\naudit process, providing necessary documentation for review, and responding to audit queries.\n\n73. **Project funds will be channeled through segregated designated accounts (DAs) for**\n**each line ministry to be opened at the Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB).** The three DAs (2 under\nARTF and 1 under IDA) will be maintained and controlled by MoF; however, MRRD and IDLG\nfinance departments will be responsible for managing the DA and carrying out periodic\nreconciliation. In addition, MoF will set up two clearance accounts in AFN (one each for MRRD\nand IDLG) to channel grant funds to the CDCs and GAs. All project payments will be centralized\nin Kabul, except for operational cash needs in the provinces and districts. Disbursements from the\ngrant will be made using advances, reimbursements and direct payments. The project will follow\nthe IFR based disbursement method. All withdrawal applications to the Bank, including advances,\nreimbursement and direct payment applications, will be prepared by MRRD and IDLG and\nsubmitted by MoF. Copies of supporting documentation for all project payments will be\nmaintained at the MRRD and IDLG central and provincial offices. Retroactive financing up to\nUS$2 million will be provided under the ARTF for payments made from June 1, 2016.\n\n74. **Internal audit for the project will be carried out by the Internal Audit Department**\n**of MoF, MRRD, and IDLG; however these reviews are largely focused at the central level.**\nGiven the scope and complexity of this project, a technical audit is also proposed. The periodicity\nand terms of reference will be discussed during implementation. The annual project audit will be\ncarried out by SAO, with technical assistance from an audit agent. The project financial statements\nwill be prepared by MoF, using the AFMIS. Annual audited project financial statements will be\nsubmitted within six months of the close of the government’s fiscal year.\n\n75. There are no overdue audit reports, no overdue IFRs and no ineligible expenditures under\nongoing or closed projects implemented by MRRD or IDLG. Further details on the fiduciary\narrangements are presented in Annex 2.\n\n**D. Procurement**\n\n\n76. **Procurement of goods, works and non-consulting services shall be carried out in**\n**accordance with the “Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works and Non-Consulting**\n**Services under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Borrowers”**\npublished by the World Bank in January 2011 (revised July 2014). For the selection of consultants,\nthe “Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits\nand Grants by World Bank Borrowers” published by the World Bank in January 2011 (revised\nJuly 2014) shall be applied. The “Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption\n\n\nPage 39 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nin Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants,\" dated October 15, 2006 and\nupdated January 2011, shall apply to the project.\n\n77. **The overall responsibility for procurement and contract management under the**\n**project will be with the staff of the project management team (PMT) of the respective**\n**implementing agencies (IAs), namely IDLG for urban areas and MRRD for rural areas.**\nPMT staff will act as the World Bank's main interlocutors for all procurement aspects of the\nproject. The PMT will also be responsible for contract management. Training on procurement and\ncontract management will be provided to the staff of the PMT and designated officials of MRRD\nand IDLG. MRRD and IDLG’s own staff of civil servants will be complemented by contracted\nstaff on procurement and contract management who will have dual responsibilities – functional\ntasks and transfer of knowledge and capacity building to the MRRD and IDLG civil servant staff.\nTo this end, the contracted project procurement and contracts management staff will be embedded\nwithin implementing agencies’ procurement departments to work alongside with the civil servants.\nProject engineers and FPs will provide basic procurement training to CDCs, and the CDCs’\nprocurement under the overall procurement and contracts management responsibilities will be\nfacilitated by the respective IAs.\n\n78. **An assessment of the procurement capacity of MRRD and IDLG was carried out.** It\nconcluded that that MRRD has procurement staff with experience implementing the World Bank\nfunded projects, while IDLG is an agency new at implementing the World Bank funded projects.\nThe World Bank’s Procurement Prior Review (PPR) thresholds for the project were set based on\nthe procurement risk rating assuming existing procurement capacity. The World Bank will\ninitially provide increased implementation support of three missions/meetings for the staff of the\nrelatively new IDLG as needed, and some of these would be through the use of information\ntechnology (e.g. video-conference) for effective and timely communication. The initial increased\nimplementation support may be reduced as IDLG’s capacity increases.\n\n79. **An initial Procurement Plan (PP) has been prepared by the IAs and agreed with the**\n**World Bank team.** The Procurement Plans have been submitted through the online Systematic\nTracing of Exchanges in Procurement (STEP) tool and a summary of the PP is included in Annex\n2. The PPs will be updated at least annually during the life of the project, when new information\nbecomes available which warrants changes in the plan.\n\n80. The FPs will support CDCs in project implementation, including for procurement and\ncontract management.\n\n81. **Any goods, works and non-consulting services contract can be procured by CDCs,**\n**following Community Procurement** as per paragraph 3.19 of the World Bank’s Procurement\nGuidelines and provisions of the Operations Manual, which will be prepared by the respective IAs\nand agreed by the World Bank.\n\n82. **The procurement risk assessment was done in consultation with the IAs, and the risk**\n**mitigation measures were identified.** The online Procurement Risk Assessment and\n\n\nPage 40 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7877010107040405,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7605440616607666,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.8374816179275513,
+ "start": 333,
+ "end": 336
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5540100932121277,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic\nTracing of Exchanges in Procurement",
+ "confidence": 0.6384398341178894,
+ "start": 446,
+ "end": 452
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6078397631645203,
+ "start": 469,
+ "end": 470
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5599707365036011,
+ "start": 501,
+ "end": 502
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "online Procurement Risk Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9901583790779114,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nManagement System (PRAMS) tool has been used for the purpose. The PRAMS was finalized at\nthe time of appraisal and then archived. The procurement risk rating for the experienced MRRD\nis _Substantial_ and for new IDLG is _High_ . Since the ratio of the funding by the World Bank for\nMRRD & IDLG is 82 percent and 18 percent respectively, the overall project procurement rating\nis _**SUBSTANTIAL**_ . These ratings could become _Moderate_ (for MRRD) and _Substantial_ (for\nIDLG) with the implementation of agreed risk mitigation measures. The risks will be periodically\nassessed during the implementation support missions.\n\n\n**E. Social (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n83. **A central concept of CCAP is improved governance through broader and more**\n**systematic interaction between the state and its citizens at the local level.** Project investments\ncall for increased participation of women and men through elected CDC representatives in\nplanning and implementing subprojects and monitoring service delivery. It is anticipated that the\nimpact of enhanced participation will help: (i) build the confidence and strengthen the capacity of\nlocal communities to engage in decision-making on a broad range of services, which directly affect\npeople’s lives; (ii) make government more responsive and accountable to its citizens; (iii) enhance\nthe quality of services and the efficiency of their delivery; and (iv) ensure that the views and voices\nof the most vulnerable groups, especially returnees/IDPs, and female- headed and landless\nhouseholds, are reflected in the selection and implementation of subprojects under Component 1.\nSubproject activities are also expected to contribute to improved living standards, including social\nservices, access farm to markets, and employment opportunities.\n\n84. **Local communities are the primary stakeholders in CCAP.** The project’s inclusion\nstrategy prioritizes: (i) a facilitated participatory planning process at the community level, which\nsets out an approach for an election of CDC members, who will represent all sub-groups in the\ncommunity; and (ii) internal monitoring, external independent evaluation and third party\nmonitoring to assess the inclusiveness of CDCs and provide feedback to inform corrective actions\nas necessary. Local government structures in both rural and urban areas are also key stakeholders,\nand the project will strengthen their capacity to support and monitor CDCs.\n\n85. **Subproject activities under Component 1 Service Standards Grants of CCAP are not**\n**expected to have major adverse social impacts.** Systematic involvement of local citizens\nthroughout the planning and implementation of infrastructure projects will underpin the\nidentification of potential negative social impacts and corresponding mitigation measures to be\nincluded in the Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs). Clearly defined\ntransparent selection criteria will inform identification of subprojects.\n\n86. **Citizen Engagement** . Citizen engagement is a critical core element of the Project. The\nProject will mainly focus on working closely with communities and will use the grievance redress\nmechanism (GRM) as one of the main citizen engagement tools, as is done under NSP. The\nimplementing agencies will establish a dedicated unit for receiving, registering, processing,\nanalyzing, monitoring and resolving grievances. The results framework contains indicators related\nto resolution of grievances and citizens’ satisfaction with CDCs’ performance as well as with grant\n\n\nPage 41 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.784505307674408,
+ "start": 149,
+ "end": 150
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "subprojects",
+ "confidence": 0.716101884841919,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 195
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "returnees/IDPs",
+ "confidence": 0.56428062915802,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.6393349766731262,
+ "start": 350,
+ "end": 351
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Component 1 Service Standards",
+ "confidence": 0.5823234915733337,
+ "start": 460,
+ "end": 464
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "results framework",
+ "confidence": 0.644171416759491,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 614
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "citizens",
+ "confidence": 0.5115285515785217,
+ "start": 622,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ninvestments.\n\n87. **OP/BP 4.12: Involuntary Resettlement is triggered due to potential land acquisition.**\nAlthough no resettlement, major land acquisition and/or asset loss is expected, very small areas of\nland may be bought outright (willing buyer - willing seller) or acquired against community\ncompensation to facilitate new or rehabilitation of small-scale infrastructure work under\nComponent 1. In regard to the Government land transferred by the authorities to the project,\ndocumentation must be free of encroachments, squatters, competing claims or other\nencumbrances. In exceptional cases, minor voluntary land donation may occur in certain areas but\nonly if there are no structures or assets on the land and the impact of the donation on the livelihood\nof the landowner is not significant (less than 10 percent). The voluntary nature of the donation\nwill be fully documented and independently verified. Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans\n(RAPs) will be prepared as required. Guidelines on their preparation are included as part of the\nthe Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF).\n\n88. **WB OP 4.11: Physical Cultural Resources** **is triggered because it is possible that**\n**proposed investments might be located in areas and locations that may negatively impact**\n**local cultural properties and/or historical sites.** Such possibilities are considered remote\nbecause of the small size of any sub-investments, none of which involve excavation. Procedures\nfor dealing with chance finds of historical or cultural artifacts are set out in the ESMF. Cultural\nand Historical Management Plans will be prepared as required.\n\n89. **Consultations on an advanced draft of the ESMF were held with a range of**\n**stakeholders in Kabul on June 29, 2016.** The minutes from those consultations are attached as\nan annex to the final ESMF. The final ESMF and RPF were disclosed on the MRRD and IDLG\nwebsites on August 31, 2016.\n\n90. **Gender will be mainstreamed in all components of CCAP.** Building on NSP’s\nachievements in this regard and lessons learned, CCAP will take proactive measures to ensure\nwomen’s active participation throughout the project cycle, including quotas for female\nparticipation in CDCs, female staffing, provision of gender-related trainings, involving women in\ncommunity planning, decision-making, and monitoring processes, and sensitizing the communities\non the role of gender in development. CCAP will coordinate closely with the upcoming Women’s\nEconomic Empowerment Program in helping to identify women’s needs, access services, mobilize\nwomen, and avail of female literacy and other training opportunities. See Annex 6: Gender Plan\nfor CCAP for more details.\n\n\n**F. Environment (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n91. **The CCAP subprojects are considered Category B, and the World Bank policies,**\n**including OP/BP 4.01, OP/BP 4.11 and OP/BP 4.12, are triggered** while a number of relevant\nlaws and regulations are also applicable.\n\n\nPage 42 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n92. **OP/BP 4.01: Environmental Assessment** **is triggered as the Service Standards Grants**\n**under Component 1 may cause adverse environmental impacts, including occupational**\n**health and safety issues.** The ESMF addresses issues regarding the environmental impacts as\nwell as spelling out the policy, guidelines and procedures to minimize and mitigate the likelihood\nof the any negative impacts. It is anticipated that the proposed upgrading of small infrastructure\nworks under Component 1 will have minimal adverse impact on the environment. Such impacts\nare expected to be small, localized and temporary and thus effectively managed with tangible and\neasily applied mitigation measures to be included in ESMPs. An assessment of the negative\nimpacts can be classified into pre-construction, construction and post-construction phases. Typical\npotential minor environmental impacts during rehabilitation and construction include, but are not\nlimited to, soil and land degradation, increased dust/air pollution, noise level increase, water\npollution, and construction debris.\n\n93. In compliance with the World Bank’s safeguards policies and the Afghanistan\nEnvironmental Law and Evaluating Environmental Impact Regulation, subprojects with\nsignificant adverse impact should go for Environmental Clearance by the National Environmental\nProtection Agency (NEPA). The CCAP subprojects are small-scale and community based and\nexpected to have very limited adverse impacts. As a result, it is anticipated that Environmental\nClearance will be taken for a sample of subprojects by NEPA per province, as was the agreement\nfor NSP.\n\n**G. Other Safeguard Policies**\n\n\n94. No other safeguard policies apply.\n\n\n**H. World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n95. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a World\nBank (WB) supported project may submit complaints to existing project-level grievance redress\nmechanisms or the WB’s Grievance Redress Service (GRS). The GRS ensures that complaints\nreceived are promptly reviewed in order to address project-related concerns. Project affected\ncommunities and individuals may submit their complaint to the WB’s independent Inspection\nPanel which determines whether harm occurred, or could occur, as a result of WB noncompliance with its policies and procedures. Complaints may be submitted at any time after\nconcerns have been brought directly to the World Bank's attention, and Bank Management has\nbeen given an opportunity to respond. For information on how to submit complaints to the World\nBank’s corporate Grievance Redress Service (GRS), please visit\nhttp://www.worldbank.org/GRS. For information on how to submit complaints to the World\nBank Inspection Panel, please visit http://www.inspectionpanel.org\n\n\nPage 43 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING**\n\n\n**Results Framework**\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n**Project Development Objectives**\n\nThe Project Development Objective for the Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project is to improve the delivery of core infrastructure and social\nservices to participating communities through strengthened Community Development Councils (CDCs). These services are part of a\nminimum service standards package that the Government is committed to delivering to the citizens of Afghanistan.\n\n\n**Project Development Objective Indicators**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|PDO Level Results
Indicators|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/
Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:** Project beneficiaries|✔|Number|0.00|8.5 million|Semi‐annually|Project MIS|MRRD and IDLG|\n|**Name:** Female beneficiaries|✔|Percentage|0.00|50 %|Semi‐annually|Project MIS|MRRD and IDLG|\n|||||||||\n|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|Description: Important:These indicators include the populations covered under CCAP during the first phase. As planning and implementation involve entire
communities and CCAP is building public goods such as roads and water points, the estimated population for the entire CCAP coverage area is included. This follows
earlier OPCS guidance on CDD and local government projects.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 44 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Development Objective Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9902641773223877,
+ "start": 113,
+ "end": 117
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9727492332458496,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "citizens of Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7147914171218872,
+ "start": 107,
+ "end": 110
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5943703651428223,
+ "start": 200,
+ "end": 202
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5629260540008545,
+ "start": 280,
+ "end": 281
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "OPCS",
+ "confidence": 0.5010828971862793,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "CCAP coverage area",
+ "confidence": 0.5719056725502014,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.7233569025993347,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 621
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "OPCS",
+ "confidence": 0.5870124697685242,
+ "start": 667,
+ "end": 668
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "CCAP coverage area",
+ "confidence": 0.8168841004371643,
+ "start": 655,
+ "end": 658
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5986145734786987,
+ "start": 756,
+ "end": 757
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "CCAP coverage area",
+ "confidence": 0.8492756485939026,
+ "start": 791,
+ "end": 794
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Col3|Col4|of 600 urban
CDCs|Col6|reports|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|
Description:Measured as part of CDC Maturity Index assessing organizational and management capacities. This index was developed previously under NSP and will be
updated for CCAP. Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, the end target is @ 83% of the planned total, e.g., 10,000 out of planned 12,000 rural CDCs and
500 out of planned 600 urban CDCs. Therefore total CDCs by the end of project for this particular indicator is 10,500.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Number of rural and
urban communities meeting
all minimum service
standards|Col2|Number|0.00|9,000
communities
Rural: 8,600 out
of 12,000
communities
Urban: 400 out
of 600
communities|Semi‐annually|Project MIS
Improved service
delivery evaluation
Third party monitoring|MRRD and IDLG
ARTF|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|
Description:Due to high risks related to fragility and insecurity, as well as sectoral challenges in providing some services, the end target is @ 70% of the planned total,
e.g., 8,600 out of planned 12,000 rural communities and 400 out of planned 600 urban communities. Therefore, total communities by end of project for this particular
indicator are 9,000 communities.|\n\n\n**Intermediate Results Indicators**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Intermediate Level Results
Indicators|Col2|Core|Col4|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source /
Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|**Component 1: Service Standards Grants**|\n|**Name:**Rural areas ‐
Number/type of rural
subprojects completed (for
water points, roads,|||Number|Number|0.00|8,600|Semi‐annually
|Project MIS
|MRRD
|\n\n\nPage 45 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.9283559918403625,
+ "start": 81,
+ "end": 84
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.8987246751785278,
+ "start": 84,
+ "end": 89
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8739970326423645,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5471153855323792,
+ "start": 30,
+ "end": 31
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.9763019680976868,
+ "start": 184,
+ "end": 187
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.9058851599693298,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.974062442779541,
+ "start": 390,
+ "end": 393
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.8965591192245483,
+ "start": 393,
+ "end": 398
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.980995237827301,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.9320176243782043,
+ "start": 496,
+ "end": 501
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5507413744926453,
+ "start": 555,
+ "end": 557
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.9390488862991333,
+ "start": 699,
+ "end": 702
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.7418062090873718,
+ "start": 702,
+ "end": 707
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.6421977281570435,
+ "start": 659,
+ "end": 660
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CDC Maturity Index",
+ "confidence": 0.9894771575927734,
+ "start": 802,
+ "end": 805
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "assessing organizational and management capacities",
+ "confidence": 0.9459902048110962,
+ "start": 805,
+ "end": 810
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.5500107407569885,
+ "start": 817,
+ "end": 818
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6634939312934875,
+ "start": 1116,
+ "end": 1117
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.8146567940711975,
+ "start": 1203,
+ "end": 1204
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.5152320861816406,
+ "start": 1290,
+ "end": 1291
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5126141309738159,
+ "start": 1295,
+ "end": 1296
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "
indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.5051560401916504,
+ "start": 1374,
+ "end": 1378
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6607781648635864,
+ "start": 1551,
+ "end": 1552
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Intermediate Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9835703372955322,
+ "start": 1735,
+ "end": 1738
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Service Standards Grants",
+ "confidence": 0.8143478631973267,
+ "start": 1832,
+ "end": 1835
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.6343993544578552,
+ "start": 1944,
+ "end": 1946
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|irrigation, electricity)|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|
Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|\n|**Intermediate Level**
**Results Indicators**
|**Core**|**Unit of**
**Measure**|**Baseline**|**End Target**|**Frequency**|**Data Source /**
**Methodology**|**Responsibility for**
**Data Collection**|\n|**Name:**Urban areas ‐
Number/type of urban
subprojects completed
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)||Number|0.00|400|Semi‐annually|Project MIS|IDLG|\n|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|Description:The Project cannot determine subproject targets ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize based upon service standards.
Investments will be determined based upon a needs assessment of the first year.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Rural areas ‐ Number
of people (male/female)
benefitting from each type of
subproject (access to water,
roads, irrigation and
electricity)|Col2|Number|0.00|TBD|Semi‐annually|Project MIS|MRRD|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|**Name:**Urban areas ‐ Number
of urban residents
(male/female) benefitting
from each type of subproject
(drainage, streets, street
lighting, parks)
Number
0.00
TBD
Semi‐annually
Project MIS
IDLG
Description:Cannot determine beneficiary target numbers ex‐ante as communities decide on types of projects they need and prioritize. Project will be tracking number
of persons benefitting directly from each type of service.
|\n\n\nPage 46 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n|Intermediate Level
Results Indicators|Core|Col3|Unit of
Measure|Col5|Baseline|End Target|Col8|Frequency|Data Source /
Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Name:**% of sampled
community respondents
(male/female) (satisfied with
subproject/grant
investments||Percentage|Percentage|0.00|0.00|0.00|60%|Annually|Project MIS, evaluations,
third party monitoring|MRRD and IDLG|\n\n\n**Component 2: Institution Building**\n\n\n\n|Name: % of CDCs initiating
activities to benefit
marginalized and vulnerable
groups such as women,
IDPs/returnees (in addition
to service standards)|Col2|Percentage|0.00|35%|Annually|Project MIS|MRRD and IDLG|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**% of sampled
community respondents
(male/female) satisfied with
CDCs’ performance in their
mandated roles||Percentage|0.00|60 %|Annually for
monitoring, mid‐term
and final for external
evaluation|Based upon social
audits, random sample|MRRD and IDLG,
third party
monitors, external
evaluator|\n|**Name:** % of CDC members
in rural and urban areas
who are women||Percentage|0.00|Rural: 35%
Urban: 40%|Reported once
elections are held
and confirmed at
mid‐term and final|Project MIS, third party
monitoring, mid‐term
and final evaluation,
gender study|MRRD and IDLG,
third party
monitors, external
evaluator|\n|**Name:** % of sampled
CDCs/communities whose
CDPs include at least one
women’s priority activity||Percentage|0.00|60%||Project MIS, gender
study|MRRD and IDLG|\n\n\nPage 47 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community respondents",
+ "confidence": 0.6400372982025146,
+ "start": 126,
+ "end": 128
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9209244847297668,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project MIS",
+ "confidence": 0.5301647186279297,
+ "start": 172,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.6554877758026123,
+ "start": 202,
+ "end": 203
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community respondents",
+ "confidence": 0.5632094144821167,
+ "start": 307,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.7094565629959106,
+ "start": 202,
+ "end": 203
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender study",
+ "confidence": 0.653745174407959,
+ "start": 487,
+ "end": 489
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural and urban areas",
+ "confidence": 0.8060377836227417,
+ "start": 411,
+ "end": 415
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDC members",
+ "confidence": 0.7242321968078613,
+ "start": 405,
+ "end": 407
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Intermediate Level
Results Indicators|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source /
Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**# of districts/cities
where Citizens’ Charter
coordination meetings are
held between government
authorities and CDC
clusters/_Gozars_||Number|0.00|Rural: 70
districts
Urban: 4 cities
for urban areas|Semi‐annual|Semi‐annual progress
reports|Citizens’ Charter
Working Group,
provincial and
district governors
|\n|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|Description:Meeting frequency may fluctuate throughout the life of project. At a minimum, the coordination meetings should take place at least twice a year until
minimum service standards are met.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Number of
government provincial and
municipalities whose abilities
are strengthened in
engineering, project
management, FM and
procurement|Col2|Number|Col4|Rural: 34
provinces
Urban: 4 cities|Quarterly|Quarterly progress
reports|MRRD and IDLG|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|Description:Rural = 34 provinces, Urban = 4 cities. Total 38 provinces and cities|\n\n\n**Component 3: Monitoring and Knowledge Learning**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Number of
evaluations and studies
completed|Col2|Number|0.00|6|Reported in quarterly
reports. It is
anticipated that
there will be studies
throughout the
project life.|Quarterly project
reports|Citizens’ Charter
working group|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|Description:See list of studies and evaluations in Annex 2.|\n\n\nPage 48 of 139\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6366605758666992,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8512017130851746,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.5231420397758484,
+ "start": 105,
+ "end": 108
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "reports",
+ "confidence": 0.6250680088996887,
+ "start": 172,
+ "end": 173
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.6842742562294006,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 177
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "list of studies and evaluations",
+ "confidence": 0.638393223285675,
+ "start": 879,
+ "end": 884
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "list of studies and evaluations",
+ "confidence": 0.9198788404464722,
+ "start": 905,
+ "end": 910
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Intermediate Level
Results Indicators|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source /
Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:** % of rural and urban
CDC cross‐visits that include
women CDC members||Percentage|0|Rural: 20%
Urban: 50%|Annual reports|Annual project progress
reports|MRRD and IDLG|\n\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Implementation and Management**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: % of grievances
received which are resolved|Col2|Percentage|0.00|70%|Quarterly|MIS|MRRD and IDLG|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Number of rural and
urban CDCs reporting semi‐
annually on service standard
targets||Number|0.00|9,000|Semi‐annual reports,|MIS, score cards and
annual social audits|MRRD and IDLG|\n|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|Description: 8,600 CDCs out of a target of 12,000 in rural areas; 400 out of a target of 600 in urban areas. This indicator relates to CDCs’ reporting their status not the
attainment of the standards which is listed above.
|\n\n\nPage 49 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annual reports",
+ "confidence": 0.5087028741836548,
+ "start": 134,
+ "end": 136
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.853421688079834,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "% of grievances",
+ "confidence": 0.5682550668716431,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 166
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5813549160957336,
+ "start": 306,
+ "end": 308
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9831530451774597,
+ "start": 241,
+ "end": 242
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.888675332069397,
+ "start": 321,
+ "end": 322
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5706241130828857,
+ "start": 306,
+ "end": 308
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9970398545265198,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9018856287002563,
+ "start": 489,
+ "end": 490
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.7433808445930481,
+ "start": 474,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.99783855676651,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9449539184570312,
+ "start": 601,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural areas",
+ "confidence": 0.674066960811615,
+ "start": 642,
+ "end": 644
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9988514184951782,
+ "start": 604,
+ "end": 605
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n1. The Project Development Objective (PDO) for the Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project\n(CCAP) is to improve the delivery of core infrastructure and social services to participating\ncommunities through strengthened Community Development Councils (CDCs). These services\nare part of a minimum service standards package to citizens.\n\n**Project Description**\n\n2. **To provide improved services,** **CCAP’s parent program,** **the Citizens’ Charter, will**\n**set a threshold of core infrastructure and services that the government will provide to all**\n**accessible communities over the next ten years** . The critical services include: basic education\nand health services; clean drinking water; and other rural infrastructure as explained below. The\nCharter is not only about the delivery of services but also about the standards of service delivery\ncitizens can expect.\n\n3. **The Citizens’ Charter will be the first inter-ministerial program where Ministries**\n**collaborate on a single program in both rural and urban areas** . MoF chairs the government’s\nworking group on Citizens’ Charter with MRRD and IDLG as lead implementing agencies for the\nrural and urban components respectively. The working group also consists of MoE, MoPH, and\nMAIL.\n\n4. **The service standards of the Citizens’ Charter and CCAP are:**\n\n**In Rural Areas**\n\nApproximately 12,000 rural communities across 34 provinces will receive assistance over\nthe course of four years:\n\n(a) **Universal access to clean drinking water:** one water point per 25 households,\nproviding 25 liters of water per person per day;\n\n(b) **Rural infrastructure:** communities will have at least one of the following services\n(depending on gap analysis, community prioritization and accessibility):\n\n - **Basic electricity:** 100W per household through solar, micro hydro, biogas or\nwind (only in areas that cannot be reached by the grid);\n\n - **Basic road access** : within 2 kilometers walking distance from nearest\naccessible rural road (accessible areas only); and\n\n\nPage 50 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n - **Small-scale** **irrigation** **infrastructure** : this includes intakes (for\nsecondary/tertiary canals), water divider, water control gates, siphon, water\nreservoir up to 10,000 M3 capacity, rehabilitation or construction of small\nirrigation canal, protection wall, gabion wall, aqueducts, and super passage.\n\n(c) **Quality education in government schools** as part of MoE’s existing education\nstandards. Citizens will monitor that:\n\n - Teachers will have at least grade 12 education; and\n\n - Students will have 24 hours per week of education in grade 1-3, 30 hours of\neducation in grade 4-6 and 36 hours of education in grade 7-12; and\n\n(d) **Delivery of basic package of health services,** as part of the MoPH’s existing\nhealth package. Citizens will monitor the following services:\n\n - Health facilities will comply with required opening hours (8am to 4pm),\nrequired staffing requirements, and provide mandated services;\n\n - **Health post** : awareness on malaria, diarrhea, and acute respiratory infections,\nreferral to health facilities, and health education;\n\n - **Health sub-center** : treatment of pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria, antenatal\ncare, family planning, tuberculosis case detection and referral, and\nimmunization services;\n\n - **Basic health center** : outpatient care, immunizations, maternal and newborn\ncare, and nutrition interventions; and\n\n - **Comprehensive health center** : antenatal, delivery, postpartum and newborn\ncare, routine immunization, and nutrition interventions.\n\n**In Urban Areas**\n\n5. **Urban areas require a different set of criteria and operating procedures because of**\n**the complex structure of community representation and population density, as well as**\n**different infrastructure needs.** Also, the urban areas have not had the years of experience with\nNSP as in rural areas. Lastly, urban infrastructure needs to be part of an overall municipal\ndevelopment plan with linkages to trunk infrastructure.\n\n6. **CCAP will cover 600 CDCs and 120** _**Gozars**_ **in the four major provincial capitals.** Each\nurban CDC will receive a grant of US$70,000 over the course of four years. Based upon the needs\nand priorities of the community and the Community Development Plan, the community can choose\none or more services from the list below:\n\n(a) **Street upgrading and drainage:** includes concreting streets, sidewalks, drainage\nand tree planting along streets;\n\n\nPage 51 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(b) **Provision of potable water:** can include extension of existing municipal water\nnetwork, small water supply scheme or hand pump installation;\n\n(c) **Solid waste management:** solid waste management from the household level,\nwhich includes awareness raising, linked to existing municipal waste collection\nmechanisms;\n\n(d) **Household numbering;** and\n\n(e) **Lighting/electricity:** can include extension of electrical grid, including installation\nof electrical transformers. Additionally households will be encouraged to install\nlights outside their homes.\n\n7. **Each** _**Gozar**_ **(composed of five CDCs or up to 1,000 – 1,250 households) will receive a**\n**total grant of US$200,000 over the course of four years.** Based on the needs and priorities of\nthe community and the Community Development Plans, the community can choose one or more\nservices from the menu below:\n\n(a) **Secondary road upgrading and readjustment:** includes concreting streets,\nsidewalks, drainage, and tree planting along streets;\n\n(b) **Provision of potable water network:** extension of existing municipal water\nnetwork;\n\n(c) **Park/recreation area/playground** for children and women;\n\n(d) **Solid waste management** : linkage for transfer of waste from designated waste site\nto dump site, facilitated by municipality;\n\n\n(e) **Lighting/electricity** : can include extension of electrical grid, including installation\nof electrical transformers. Additionally, lights will be installed on secondary\nstreets; and\n\n(f) **Livelihood projects for women** : a percentage of the _Gozar_ grant will be\ndesignated for women’s projects, particularly women’s economic activities with\nlinkages to relevant urban market demands in the area. The Citizens’ Charter will\ncoordinate these livelihood activities closely with the upcoming Government’s\nNational Priority Program for Women’s Economic Empowerment, to support\nwomen-only business skills training centers, partner with existing, communitybased women’s lending and business groups to provide business and financial skills\ntraining, and access credit.\n\n\nPage 52 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 1.1: Citizens’ Charter Service Standards**\n\n|Rural Areas|Urban Areas|\n|---|---|\n|**Access to Clean Drinking Water**
**Access to Rural Infrastructure.**Choice of:
Road access
Electricity (in areas not reached by grid)
Small-scale irrigation|**Access to Urban Infrastructure**. Choice of:
Potable water
Street upgrading and drainage
Lighting, electricity
Park, recreation area
Solid waste management
Household numbering
Livelihood projects for women|\n|**MoPH Health Standards**
Health facilities complying with required open hours, staffing, and mandated health services
In urban areas, pharmacies will be registered and meet basic MoPH requirements|**MoPH Health Standards**
Health facilities complying with required open hours, staffing, and mandated health services
In urban areas, pharmacies will be registered and meet basic MoPH requirements|\n|**MoE Education Standards**
Teachers with a least grade 12 education
Students will have 24 – 36 hours per week of education|**MoE Education Standards**
Teachers with a least grade 12 education
Students will have 24 – 36 hours per week of education|\n\n\n\n8. **All infrastructure investments at the community and** _**Gozar**_ **levels will be validated by**\n**municipal authorities to ensure that they are consistent with municipal development plans** .\nUnder the current urban community projects, it is standard practice to have municipalities join the\ncommunity planning meetings and validate these plans so that there is no duplication and to\nimprove linkages with trunk infrastructure.\n\n9. **At the** _**Gozar**_ **level, communities will monitor to ensure:**\n\n\n(a) **Quality education in government schools** (same as in rural areas, noted above);\n\n(b) **Delivery of basic package of health services** (same as in rural areas, noted above);\n\n(c) **Private health facilities will provide health services according to agreed**\n**standards with the MoPH.** All facilities must be appropriately staffed, meet\nhygiene requirements, including disposal of medical waste, provide adequate space\nand privacy, particularly for female patients, and keep patient records; and\n\n(d) **Pharmacies will be registered and meet basic requirements stipulated by the**\n**MoPH.** All pharmacies must have a license that is visibly displayed, with licensed\npharmacists on duty and clearly state and stamp the price of medication.\n\n10. **For agriculture, during project preparation, it was determined that it would be**\n**difficult to specify a service standard which would be applicable and meaningful across all**\n**34 provinces given the diverse agricultural climates and needs in the country.** And unlike\neducation and health, the existing agricultural projects are not national in scope. As with NSP,\n\n\nPage 53 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nhowever, MAIL will work closely with CDCs and the agricultural sub-committees in specific areas\nof the country to provide extension services, train farmers, and assist with farm to market linkages\nand agricultural process as part of existing MAIL projects.\n\n11. **Strengthening the Sectoral Response and Supply Side of Service Delivery** . Attaining\nthe minimum service standards as described above will require strong commitment and enhanced\ncoordination between communities and line ministries at the various levels. To make the “supply-meetsdemand” cycle work, and concurrently with the implementation of the rural and urban grants, the\nProject will build a strong monitoring and reporting mechanism into the operation, building upon\nNSP’s existing systems. CDCs, assisted by FPs, will complete simple scorecards on the\nachievement of the standards, and these scorecards will be discussed with local service providers\n(schools, health clinics, and district line ministries) and reported back to the district and provincial\nlevels where results will be reviewed at a forum chaired by the Governor. Semi-annual reports\nwill also be sent to the Office of the President, MoF, and Citizens’ Charter national working group\nto monitor progress, remove obstacles, and re-allocate resources if needed. The Office of the\nPresident has signaled its strong commitment to this “flagship program” and will be monitoring it\nclosely in the future. Second, the Citizens’ Charter will be tied to MoF’s current performancebased budgeting reforms whereby national priority programs and projects will be evaluated each\nyear and resources allocated based upon good performance. While these budget reforms are part\nof the Government’s broader national reform agenda and are not directly tied to the Citizens’\nCharter, they do indicate a desire by the government to more carefully monitor project performance\nand disbursement rates across the development portfolio. Third, the project will strengthen the\npresence of engineers and management units at the provincial, municipality and some district\nlevels to provide technical assistance to CDCs, address grievances, and resolve issues.\nStrengthening district outreach to communities will increase the chances of services actually being\ndelivered. Lastly, new training modules, adapted from NSP’s training curricula and those of other\ncommunity development projects, are being developed to build the capacity of CDCs and\nprovincial and local governments to provide services.\n\n12. **Selection of Project Locations for Phase One.** For equity reasons, CCAP will start in all\n34 provinces of the country and the four major city hubs (except for Kabul). Approximately onethird of districts were chosen in each province based upon two criteria: (i) security and accessibility\nof communities; and (ii) those communities that have not recently received a second round of\ngrants from NSP or other donor funding for similar activities. Using the aforementioned criteria,\nthe President’s Office, line ministries, and provincial governors and mayors have selected the\ndistricts. The other two-thirds of the country will be covered in subsequent phases, funding\npermitting. As for the urban municipalities, CCAP will cover 600 urban communities and 120\n_Gozars_, which represent approximately 50 percent of the total communities and _Gozars_ in those\nfour main cities. Communities in these cities will be chosen based upon access to basic\ninfrastructure and services. Kabul is not part of the first phase of CCAP because Kabul already\nhas several urban projects funded through separate sources. It is expected that Kabul will be\nincluded in future phases assuming funding becomes available.\n\n\nPage 54 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Project Components**\n\n13. **Component 1: Service Standards Grants.** This component will support two types of\ngrants to CDCs:\n\n(a) **Rural Areas Service Standards Grants.** MRRD will have overall responsibility\nfor the implementation of these service standard grants in rural areas.\nApproximately 12,000 rural communities (or some eight million residents) across\n34 provinces will receive assistance over the course of four years. This rural subcomponent will support the minimum service standards related to rural\ninfrastructure (see earlier description). Allocations will be based upon an initial\ngap and needs assessment, undertaken by communities and FPs to determine the\ncurrent status of the minimum service standards in each community/cluster.\nInvestments follow a _needs-based approach_ rather than a uniform block grant\nallocation as previously done under NSP. The investments include water supply\nand a choice between basic road access, electricity, or small-scale irrigation. The\naverage cost for all types of subprojects is expected to be US$28,000. CDCs will\nimplement most of these projects with technical assistance from MRRD’s\nprovincial and district offices.\n\n(b) **Urban Areas Block Grants.** IDLG will have overall responsibility for the\nimplementation of the urban areas block grants. This sub-component supports\ngrants to 600 urban CDCs and 120 _Gozars_ in four major cities (Herat, Mazar-iSharif, Kandahar, and Jalalabad) to fund small infrastructure works in urban\nsettings. These four major cities are home to some 945,000 urban dwellers. The\nmenu of options includes street upgrading, parks, lighting, provision of potable\nwater, solid waste management arrangements, and women’s economic activities.\nUrban CDCs will receive US$70,000 and _Gozars_ will receive US$200,000 over the\ncourse of four years. This urban sub-component will support service delivery\nlinkages between the CDC, cluster/ _Gozar_, urban district and municipal levels. All\nurban CDC and _Gozar_ development plans will be validated and be consistent with\noverall municipality plans. Municipality authorities will participate in meetings\nregarding the CDC and GA plans to ensure proper linkages for more comprehensive\nurban development.\n\n14. **Component 2: Institution Building.** CCAP aims to build strong and sustainable Afghan\ninstitutions from national to local levels, capable of planning and managing their own\ndevelopment. This component will support: capacity building, technical assistance, and\ncommunity facilitation services. Specifically, this component includes Facilitating Partner\nservices to: raise awareness within communities about the Citizens’ Charter; facilitate elections of\nCDCs and Cluster CDCs/ _Gozars_ ; assist in creating community profiles and conducting\ninfrastructure gap analyses; encourage the participation of women and marginalized groups in\nproject activities; facilitate communities to prepare community development plans; provide\n\n\nPage 55 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ntraining to communities on financial management, participatory monitoring and reporting; monitor\nthe achievement of the minimum service standards; monitor safeguards compliance; and conduct\nassessments of CDCs’ institutional development. This component also supports training of\nprovincial, district and municipal staff on a range of project management and social organizing\nskills as well as local engineering technical services.\n\n(a) **Rural Areas.** MRRD will be responsible for this sub-component in rural areas.\nThis sub-component will support approximately 14 FP contracts, capacity building\nand training of provincial and district staff to oversee, monitor and report upon\nproject progress, Social Organizers and engineering, and technical support to\ncommunities across all 34 provinces.\n\n(b) **Urban Areas.** IDLG will be responsible for this sub-component in urban areas.\nThis sub-component supports the OC services for IDLG as well as approximately\nfour FP contracts for each of the cities. Capacity building and training of\nmunicipality staff to supervise, monitor and report upon project progress are also\nincluded in this sub-component.\n\n15. **Component 3: Monitoring and Knowledge Learning.** This component includes\nlearning activities from village to national levels, exchange visits across communities, especially\nfor women, and support for thematic studies and evaluations.\n\n(a) **Citizens’ monitoring and scorecard.** A core part of CCAP will be to strengthen\ncitizens’ monitoring and their ability to report problems at the same time as they\nare implementing the rural and urban grants. The project will develop simple\ncitizens’ scorecards to be completed by CDCs and Social Organizers to report upon\nthe minimum service standards. CCAP will also track more closely through the\nscorecards, regular reporting and evaluations on the participation of women, poor\nand vulnerable groups, such as returnees and IDPs, during the project cycle.\nFurthermore, taking advantage of technology and high mobile access coverage in\nthe country, CCAP will explore mobile applications for reporting and grievance\nredress. Second, the project will innovate and use the satellite imagery of the\nexisting ARTF third party monitoring activity to validate infrastructure gaps and\nservice delivery outputs. For example, the presence of schools and irrigation canals\nin a sample number of areas will be validated through satellite imagery against\ncommunity monitoring reports. Lastly, this component will support ways to\nstrengthen a coordinated approach across line ministries’ monitoring and\nevaluation mechanisms including at the community, district and provincial levels,\nwithin government, and with third party monitors. As part of the Government’s\nstrong commitment to making the Citizens’ Charter operate effectively, the Office\nof the President and MoF will receive semi-annual progress reports on the\nachievement of the service standards so they can closely monitor progress, assist\nwith removing bottlenecks in service delivery, and allocate budgetary resources as\n\n\nPage 56 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6478655338287354,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6267793774604797,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.6421896815299988,
+ "start": 267,
+ "end": 268
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "citizens’ scorecards",
+ "confidence": 0.9295631051063538,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5888552069664001,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "country",
+ "confidence": 0.6603719592094421,
+ "start": 368,
+ "end": 369
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "satellite imagery",
+ "confidence": 0.7675827741622925,
+ "start": 390,
+ "end": 392
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community monitoring reports",
+ "confidence": 0.5472151637077332,
+ "start": 432,
+ "end": 435
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "semi-annual progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9655700325965881,
+ "start": 502,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nneeded. MRRD will be in charge of the activities described in this sub-component\nfor rural areas, and IDLG will be in charge of activities in urban areas.\n\n(b) **Studies and evaluations.** Several studies are planned related to service delivery,\nCDC institution strengthening, social inclusion, social accountability, and technical\nquality audits. The project will also explore the possibility of an evaluation to\nexamine the nexus between quality of service delivery and social cohesion, an\nunder-researched area in the global conflict literature. Due to MRRD’s longer\nexperience managing studies, sub-component 3 (b) on studies and evaluations has\nbeen included in MRRD’s portion of the budget although some studies may cover\nboth rural and urban areas.\n\n16. **Component 4: Project Implementation and Management.** This component will support\nthe management and oversight of CCAP at the national, provincial and district levels in rural areas\nand the municipal management units in the four regional hub cities. MRRD will be responsible\nfor implementation and management in rural areas, and IDLG will be in charge of urban areas.\nThe management teams will carry out the following functions: policy and operational planning;\nOperations Manual development; capacity building; management information and reporting\nsystems; grievance redress mechanisms; human resource management; communications; donor\nand field coordination; quality assurance on financial management and procurement; and\nsafeguards oversight.\n\n17. **Project Cycle and Phasing of Activities.** CCAP builds upon much of the institutional\nfoundation established over 14 years of NSP implementation. Under the first phase, CCAP will\nbe starting in 12,000 rural communities which represent only 40 percent of the communities\ncovered under NSP III. So while institutional arrangements need to be enhanced, the government\nis not starting from zero, and the organizational capability of MRRD has been proven. It is\nexpected that approximately 80 percent of MRRD staff who worked on NSP will continue onto\nCCAP, although their duty stations may change and subject to satisfactory performance\nevaluations. Furthermore, MRRD is only contracting up to 14 FPs as opposed to approximately\n30 FPs as in previous phases. The adjustments from NSP to CCAP will however take time and be\nphased in over the course of the four-year project period. For the urban component, IDLG has\nworked on several urban and community-based programs in the past (see Table 2.3) and will be\nsupported by an OC over the first few years. During project preparation, both MRRD and IDLG\nhave prepared a detailed implementation schedule over the life of this four-year project which\nincludes staff review and recruitment, FP and OC recruitment, procurement of goods and\nequipment, project orientation, preparation of training materials, training and capacity building,\nand the implementation of the community cycle (for community cycle, see Diagram 1.1).\n\n\nPage 57 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Diagram 1.1: Community Cycle**\n\n\n18. **Internally Displaced Persons and Returnees.** Afghanistan is the second largest refugee\nsource country in the world, with millions of refugees overseas and an increasing number of\nrefugees returning from Pakistan. The top three drivers of displacement are generally insecurity,\nlack of income opportunities and poor service provision. Over the years, NSP has served as a\ncommunity response mechanism for returnees, to provide short-term employment and services.\nDuring the early NSP years when there were large numbers of returnees, the project coordinated\nclosely with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other UN\nagencies to prioritize assistance to the districts and provinces with the most number of IDPs and\nreturnees. NSP I and II also had specific operational policies to assist these groups. For example,\nIDPs and returnees settling into communities could elect representatives to CDCs so that their\nvoices were heard and they could benefit from community subprojects. A 2012 independent\n\n\nPage 58 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nevaluation by the University of York found that NSP was widely recognized by returnees and IDPs\nas the largest provider of community development projects from which they benefited. [23]\nAdditionally, an overwhelming majority of returning refugees and IDPs considered the\ndevelopment projects implemented by CDCs to be important in their reintegration, and the\nresulting short-term employment from these projects had a positive impact on their reintegration\ninto the communities. While much is to be learned and improved from past experience, CCAP\nwill use the lessons from NSP and other community projects in urban areas to inform response\nmechanisms as needed. (See Annex 4: NSP Achievements and Lessons Learned for more details).\nCCAP will provide the community platform in rural and urban areas to coordinate interventions,\nand work with UNHCR and other relevant development actors on appropriate interventions. For\nexample, CDCs together with education _shuras_ can proactively assist children of IDP/returnee\nfamilies to enroll in school within a certain time period, or monitor grievances of IDPs/returnees\nin accessing basic services so that their specific needs are addressed. Initial funds of US$10 million\nare set aside in Component One to assist with quick responses.\n\n19. **Disaster Risk Management.** Afghanistan is highly prone to intense and recurring natural\nhazards, including earthquakes, floods, flash floods, landslides, avalanches and droughts. Since\n1980, disasters caused by natural hazards have affected 9 million people and caused over 20,000\nfatalities in Afghanistan. While earthquakes cause the highest loss of life, drought affects the most\npeople and flooding causes the most economic damage. Most disaster risk management programs\nin Afghanistan support disaster preparedness and humanitarian responses. National community\ndevelopment programs provide a unique opportunity to significantly improve both local level\ndisaster-preparedness as well as cost-effective, rapidly mobilized post-disaster reconstruction.\n\n20. **CCAP will include a stronger focus on disaster risk reduction (DRR)** to ensure resilient\ncommunity infrastructure, greater sustainability in investments as well as more resilient\ncommunities. While FPs have been asked under earlier phases of NSP to train CDCs on DRR,\nthis was never done in a consistent and coherent manner across all communities. Also, important\nlessons have since been learned both within Afghanistan (from NGO partners working at the\ncommunity level) and in other countries, which could help inform a stronger approach in the\nCCAP. Several activities will be carried out:\n\n(a) A national multi-hazard risk assessment was just recently finalized and will provide\ncritical data and mappings to inform resilient infrastructure designs, differentiated\nby provincial and district-level risk profiles;\n\n(b) A training program for the MRRD and IDLG staff will be rolled out to raise\nawareness of resilient infrastructure aspects. Easy to use checklists will be\ndeveloped for provincial officials and FPs to use in their engagements with CDCs;\n\n(c) The Operations Manual will incorporate resilience aspects; and\n\n\n23 Post-War Reconstruction & Development Unit (PRDU), University of York. 2012. _The Study of NSP’s Impact on_\n_IDP/Refugee Returnee Reintegration in Afghanistan._ York: University of York.\n\n\nPage 59 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.8697722554206848,
+ "start": 23,
+ "end": 24
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "University of York",
+ "confidence": 0.5016292333602905,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.7103461027145386,
+ "start": 102,
+ "end": 103
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "rural and urban areas",
+ "confidence": 0.528724730014801,
+ "start": 145,
+ "end": 149
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievances of IDPs/returnees",
+ "confidence": 0.5990192890167236,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.609234094619751,
+ "start": 241,
+ "end": 242
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "IDP/returnee\nfamilies",
+ "confidence": 0.7526394724845886,
+ "start": 179,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "national multi-hazard risk assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9902385473251343,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "data and mappings to inform resilient infrastructure designs",
+ "confidence": 0.6343988180160522,
+ "start": 476,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.72523033618927,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 63
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(d) A new CDC training module will be designed for rolling out a stronger and more\ncoherent DRR approach across the targeted 12,600 rural and urban communities.\n\n**Table 1.2:** **Some of the Major Changes from NSP to Citizens’ Charter**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Themes|NSP|Citizens’ Charter|\n|---|---|---|\n|Focus on core
services/standards
|Open menu with larger block
grants in rural areas.|Focus on minimum package of core
services, determined based upon needs
assessment and standards.|\n|Urban community coverage|Operating in small number of
peri-urban areas.|Expand urban coverage into 4 major
municipalities.|\n|Strengthening CDCs as
“whole-of-government”
development bodies|CDCs primarily used by
MRRD/NSP, limited
coordination with other line
ministries|CDCs will monitor and leverage
services across various ministries and
programs.|\n|Inclusion and participation of
vulnerable groups in local
development process|Communities democratically
elected CDCs with gender
representation. Wide range of
participation by vulnerable
groups.|Greater emphasis on inclusive
development and vulnerable groups
through enhanced community mapping,
needs assessments, more intensive
training and monitoring.|\n|Gender|Women representation in
CDCs and participation of
women in planning, decision-
making and implementation.|Deepening of needs analysis and roles
for women and girls, training, exchange
visits, women’s projects in urban areas.
Coordination with Women’s Economic
Empowerment Program.|\n|Stronger linkages with
provincial, district and
municipal levels of
government
|Vertical lines of reporting and
communications between
communities, province and
Kabul. District level
representation uneven.|Provincial, district and municipalities
play more prominent role in terms of
coordination, site selection, planning,
implementation, oversight, and
grievance redress.|\n|Inter-ministerial coordination
on national and sub-national
levels|Limited inter-ministerial
coordination on national and
sub-national levels. Done on
ad hoc basis.|Coordination across major Citizens’
Charter ministries at national and local
levels. Inter-ministerial Citizens’
Charter Working Group formed.|\n|DRR|Some limited DRR training on
ad hoc basis depending upon
FP.|Systemic changes in Operations
Manual, training modules, infra designs
and use of provincial and district level
risk profiles.|\n|Clustering CDCs
|Clustering CDCs was pilot-
tested in a few rural areas.|CDCs will be clustered in rural and
urban areas to match service delivery
needs at more aggregated levels (e.g.
schools, health clinics, infra).|\n\n\n\nPage 60 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 64
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS**\n\n\n**Country: Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n**Project Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n1. **The Citizens’ Charter is an inter-ministerial effort of the Government to make service**\n**delivery more effective and citizen-responsive in Afghanistan.** At the national level, the\nCitizens’ Charter and CCAP will be under the responsibility of the Government’s High Council\nfor Governance, chaired by the President and composed of the Ministers of Finance, Justice,\nInterior, Women’s Affairs, IDLG, MRRD, as well as the Attorney General, Supreme Court, and\nCivil Service Commission. The High Council serves as the oversight bodies for all NPPs and\nprovides broad strategic direction for the NPPs.\n\n2. **The** **National Citizens’ Charter/CCAP Working Group** consists of Ministers from the\nconcerned ministries who are directly concerned with the implementation of the Citizens’\nCharter/CCAP: MoF as Chair, MRRD as Secretary, with MoPH, MoE, IDLG and MAIL as\nmembers. The purpose of this inter-ministerial working group is to guide the overall strategic and\npolicy directions, and oversee the progress of the Citizens’ Charter. This group is supported by a\nsecretariat based out of MoF’s Policy Department to coordinate activities and ensure smooth\nimplementation of the work. MoF will have the overall oversight and reporting responsibility\ngiven that actual implementation under CCAP will involve multiple agencies and the overall\nCitizens’ Charter is tied to the Government’s efforts to strengthen performance-based budgeting.\nMoF will report to both the donor community and the relevant ministerial committees. Subcommittees under the secretariat include monitoring and reporting, communications (both led by\nMRRD), and financial management (led by MoF).\n\n\n**Rural Areas**\n\n3. **National Level.** MRRD will be the main implementing agency for Citizens’\nCharter/CCAP in rural areas. MRRD has recently undergone an internal reform to restructure its\ndepartments. MRRD is dismantling its independent Program Implementation Units for various\nprograms, in line with the President’s vision for streamlined government, to increase the\nGovernment’s efficiency and capacity to deliver services on its own. MRRD is establishing a\nGeneral Directorate for the Citizens’ Charter with sub-directorates for each of the four core\nservices, which will be responsible for the Citizens’ Charter’s minimum services, and one subdirectorate for coordination. Housing sectors under one General Director for the Citizens’ Charter\nwill optimize coordination of services across the project.\n\n\nPage 61 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.6194153428077698,
+ "start": 177,
+ "end": 180
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.8722509145736694,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 305
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Rural Areas",
+ "confidence": 0.9015727639198303,
+ "start": 360,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.9734646677970886,
+ "start": 450,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 65
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Diagram 2.1: Organigram of the Citizens’ Charter Afghanistan Project**\n\n\n4. **MRRD’s General Directorate for the Citizens’ Charter will lead on program**\n**implementation.** A Director General, reporting directly to the Deputy Minister of Programs, will\nhead the MRRD Citizens’ Charter Directorate. The Directorate will include five Sub-Directorates\nas follows:\n\n(a) Sub-Directorate for Small Rural Irrigation and Flood Control;\n\n(b) Sub-Directorate for Rural Water Supply and Sanitation;\n\n\nPage 62 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 66
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(c) Sub-Directorate for Rural Access;\n\n(d) Sub-Directorate for Rural Energy Development; and\n\n(e) Sub-Directorate for Coordination which will include FP management, MIS/M&E,\ncapacity development, finances, procurement, and external liaison (donor/\ngovernment/public) and field coordination.\n\n5. **Regional, Provincial and District Levels.** At the provincial level, the Provincial\nGovernor will chair the Provincial Citizens’ Charter Management Committee, composed of all\nrelevant line ministries of the Citizens’ Charter. The same will apply for the district level. MRRD\nwill have a single Provincial Management Unit (PMU), one for each of the 34 provinces located\nin existing MRRD provincial offices.\n\n6. **The PMU will be the primary unit responsible for field monitoring of all FP activities**\n**on the ground**, sample monitoring of all community and cluster level activities under the Citizens’\nCharter related to MRRD, review of all subproject proposals and disbursement requests under the\ninvestment windows to the communities/clusters, coordination with other line ministries and\nsectoral plans for the province, and database management and reporting.\n\n7. **The six main PMUs are located in Mazar-i-Sharif, Balkh (for the North-West**\n**Region), Jalalabad, Nangarhar (for the East Region), Kunduz City, Kunduz (for the North-**\n**East Region), Herat City, Herat (for the West Region), Kandahar City, Kandahar (for the**\n**South Region) and Kabul City.** Kabul (for the Central Region) will have additional staffing that\nwill not be exclusive to that PMU but will support all the PMUs in the whole region mentioned.\nThis will include one staff each for Environmental and Social Safeguards, Gender, Engineering\nSupport, Monitoring, Training/Capacity Building, and IT/Administration Support.\n\n8. At the district level, for remote areas, which are far away from the provincial capital, some\noutposts will be established to provide district level support on engineering and supervision.\n\n9. **Facilitating Partners.** The role of FPs has been a controversial one in Afghanistan of late,\nbecause of their cost and concerns over government visibility. Both problems are being addressed\nthrough the Citizens’ Charter design rules, which distribute facilitation costs across multiple\nservices and with clear guidelines on government branding. Under the Citizens’ Charter, the\ngovernment’s roles are to define strategy, lead policy and provide oversight and technical\nassistance, while the FPs act as community facilitators and partners to support delivering services,\nparticularly in remote areas. All Citizens’ Charter documents will only have government branding\non them.\n\n10. **MRRD will contract up to 14 firms to serve as the Citizens’ Charter FPs.** FPs will\nsupport all Citizens’ Charter activities at the local level regardless of their originating ministry.\nEach FP will facilitate between 500 to 1,400 communities, and a total of 12,000 communities are\n\n\nPage 63 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.5580374002456665,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 10
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6301925778388977,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MRRD",
+ "confidence": 0.5457350015640259,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 196
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.5832515358924866,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 455
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5779389142990112,
+ "start": 431,
+ "end": 432
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens’ Charter",
+ "confidence": 0.6525582075119019,
+ "start": 518,
+ "end": 521
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.730396568775177,
+ "start": 580,
+ "end": 581
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 67
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nexpected to be covered with facilitation support (one-third of the country). The facilitation is\nproposed for a period of three years in all, of which at least two and half years must be spent with\neach community contracted to them.\n\n11. **The FP’s role** **will include:** community mobilization; CDC and Cluster CDC (CCDC)\nelections and office bearer elections; Community Participatory Monitoring (CPM) team selection;\ncapacity building of CDC, CCDC, CPM members and communities in various areas; social audits;\nlinkages; participatory community and cluster development planning; and training on the service\nstandards and good practices related to those standards, such as hand-washing, proper sanitation,\nnutrition, etc. Unlike in NSP, FPs will not be involved in subproject design, preparation or\nimplementation, or related technical assistance for the same. The engineering functions are handed\nover to the MRRD engineers (see above).\n\n12. **Rural CDCs.** CDCs will be established through democratic election processes to be\noutlined in the Citizens’ Charter Operations Manual and will be similar to the hamlet-based\nelection process used in NSP. Elected CDCs will have a term of four years in office. Elected\nmembers of the CDC will then elect the CDC’s office bearers, such as the Chairperson, the Vice\nChairperson, the Secretary and the Treasurer.\n\n13. **The CDC will have two kinds of sub-committees**, those that extend to all line ministries,\nsuch as operations and maintenance and project management, and those specific to the mandates\nof the line ministries under the Citizens’ Charter, such as education, health, agriculture, and\nirrigation. Sub-committee membership will include both CDC and non-CDC members and will\nbe outlined in the Citizens’ Charter Operations Manual.\n\n14. **The CDCs’ mandate will include** : community representation; leading a participatory\ncommunity development planning process; raising awareness of citizens’’ development rights;\nensuring equitable development outcomes under the Citizens’ Charter; overseeing the subcommittees; ensuring inclusion and participation in decision-making of the poorer and more\nmarginalized persons/groups within all development efforts; leading the participatory community\nempowerment process; maintaining bank accounts on behalf of the communities and the\ndevelopment funds for the communities channeled through them via the Citizens’ Charter funds\nand others; managing and reporting on all Citizens’ Charter funded subprojects/initiatives;\nmanaging the activities of its various sub-committees; and supporting FPs and line ministry staff\nin project implementation and other activities on the ground.\n\n15. **CDC Clusters.** To better meet the service spatial needs of the Citizens’ Charter,\ncommunities will be clustered based on pre-defined criteria into sub-district clusters. While exact\nnumbers will be determined based on final application, it is estimated that each cluster will include\nan average of five communities, and hence 12,000 communities will form around 2,400 clusters.\nOnce the clusters are defined, the CDCs established in the participating communities within a\ncluster will come together to elect a CCDC. The CCDC will play similar roles to the CDC but at\nthe sub-district level.\n\n\nPage 64 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 68
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.1: Responsibilities for Service Delivery in Rural Areas**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Levels|Roads|Water
Supply|Irrigation *
(water
resources)|Renewable
Energy
(electricity)|Education|Health|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**National**
| Ministry of
Public
Works –
primary and
secondary
roads
| Ministry of
Energy and
Water
(MEW)
| MEW –
construction
of large
schemes
| MEW| MoE, e.g.
Education
Quality
Improve-
ment
Project| MoPH, e.g.
System
Enhancing
for Health
Actions in
Transition
Program
|\n|**Province**|**Province**|**Province**| MAIL –
sectoral
policy,
design
standards,
support for
Irrigation
Associations
, farmer
training on
irrigated
agriculture| _Da_
_Afghanista_
_n Breshna_
_Sherkat_
(Afghan
National
Electricity
Company),
>5 MW
output| _Da_
_Afghanista_
_n Breshna_
_Sherkat_
(Afghan
National
Electricity
Company),
>5 MW
output| _Da_
_Afghanista_
_n Breshna_
_Sherkat_
(Afghan
National
Electricity
Company),
>5 MW
output|\n|**District**|**District**|**District**| MAIL/
MRRD| MRRD
<5 MW
output at
community
level
| MRRD
<5 MW
output at
community
level
| MRRD
<5 MW
output at
community
level
|\n|**Community**
**level**
**(CDCs/**
**CCDC)**
| MRRD –
small
tertiary
roads (inter-
village,
intra-
village)
| MRRD
mandate for
rural water
supply,
especially
drinking water
| MRRD for
small-scale,
community
/cluster-
based
irrigation
schemes in
coordination
with MAIL
and MEW
| MRRD for
small-scale,
community
/cluster-
based
irrigation
schemes in
coordination
with MAIL
and MEW
| Education
shuras,
communi-
ties help
monitor
| Health
shuras,
communi-
ties help
monitor
|\n\n\n_Note: At the local level, provincial governors and district governors will chair Citizens’ Charter management_\n_committees to provide inputs and oversee the program._ _*Irrigation and water resources responsibilities between_\n_MAIL and MRRD especially at cluster level are still under discussion with the President’s office._\n\n**Urban Areas**\n\n16. **National Level.** IDLG through the Deputy Minister of Municipalities (DMM) will be the\nmain implementing agency for Citizens’ Charter/CCAP in urban areas. IDLG will assign a total\nof 114 total staff to work on CCAP at the national and municipal levels, of which 18 staff are civil\nservants, and an expected number of 26 staff will be covered under the CBR program during the\nlife of the project. During the design phase, a short-term OC will be recruited for an initial two\nyears to take responsibility for program implementation and build the capacity of IDLG to oversee\n\n\n\nPage 65 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 69
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nthe program. The need for an OC presence will be assessed after those two years based upon\nperformance benchmarks and the World Bank’s assessment of IDLG capacity.\n\n17. **The OC with national and international technical expert advisors will support the**\n**DMM office in the Citizens’ Charter implementation management, with regard to policy**\n**formulation and overall management issues.** The OC will report directly to the DMM. The OC\nwill have 23 staff in at the national level and 44 staff at the provincial level in four municipal\noffices.\n\n18. **IDLG’s Citizens’ Charter Central Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be**\n**responsible for policy development and implementation as well as coordination with other**\n**national development programs.** It will be the structure that is responsible for all management\nand administrative issues of the Citizens’ Charter as well as communications. The PIU will be\nsupported by the OC and will take over key national role of the OC over two years. The PIU will\nbe staffed with 19 professional staff. Five additional advisors will be brought into the PIU as the\nOC role is phased out.\n\n19. **Facilitating Partners.** For the urban areas, up to four FPs will be recruited across the\ncountry to work at the sub-district level with CDCs and GAs to mobilize them, oversee election,\nbuild their capacity and train CDC sub-committees. FPs will be directly overseen by the PMUs.\n\n\nPage 66 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 70
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.2: Responsibilities for Service Delivery in Urban Areas**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Levels|Planning and
M&E|Solid Waste
Management|Roads and
Drainage|Greening|Other
Facilities|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Municipality**| Urban Strategic
and Economic
Development
Plans
M&E: Municipal
Advisory Board| Dump site
(land fill)
Recycling
plant| Primary
roads
Rain and
waste water
flow chains
Street lights
Central bus
station| Central parks
Green belt| Central
market
Central
library
Museum
Theatre
Hospitals
Universities|\n|**_Nahia_ /**
**Urban**
**District**| Urban detailed
plan
_Nahia_
Development
Plan
M&E:_Nahia24_
Association| Waste
collection
coordination
Vehicle park| Secondary
roads
Secondary
drainage
Bus stops
Street lights| Local park
for women
and children
Green space| Markets,
library
Slaughter
house
Public toilets
Hospital
High school
Water supply|\n|**_Gozar_**| _Gozar_
Development
Plan
M&E:_Gozar_
Assembly| Waste
collection
coordination
Collection
committee| Tertiary
roads
Tertiary
drainage| Football and
cricket fields
Children‘s
parks| General
hammam
General store
Health clinic
Primary and
secondary
school|\n|**CDC**| Community
Development
Plan
M&E: CDC| Collections
point
management| Waste water
generation
Local streets
Pavements
| Playgrounds
Green spaces| Hammam
Retail stores
Health
workers
Drinking
water|\n\n\n*CCAP will fund service provision activities at the _Gozar_ and CDC levels only.\n\n**Municipal Level**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n20. **IDLG’s PMU will oversee program implementation in each municipality.** The OC\nwill help build the capacity of IDLG’s PMUs, especially for planning, supervision and oversight\nof field activities.\n\n24 _Nahia_ is an urban district\n\n\nPage 67 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 71
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n21. **Urban** _**Gozar**_ **Assemblies.** Communities will be clustered based on pre-defined criteria\ninto GAs. Each GA will compose an average of five CDCs with up to 1,250 households. After\nGA establishment, the participating communities within a GA will come together to elect a GA\nChair ( _Wakil Gozar_ ), Deputy, Finance and Secretary. _Gozar_ will play similar roles as CDCs but\nfor a larger geographic space and for higher levels of planning. The GA will also have the two\nkinds of sub-committees, those that extend to all line ministries, such as operations and\nmaintenance and project management, and those specific to the mandates of the line ministries\nunder the Citizens’ Charter, such as education, health, etc. Sub-committee membership will\ninclude both GA and non-GA members and will be outlined in the Citizens’ Charter Operations\nManual.\n\n22. **Urban CDCs** . In urban areas, CDCs represent up to 250 households. Functions are similar\nto those in the rural areas in terms of community elections, mobilization, planning, decisionmaking, implementation of small-scale infrastructure and monitoring and evaluation. Under the\nCitizens’ Charter, they will help to report upon the key standards, especially education and health.\nAs spatial planning is an essential part of comprehensive urban development, work at the _Gozar_\nand community levels need to be intricately tied to higher level planning at the _Nahia_ level,\nespecially related to tenure security improvements. One advantage of the CDC approach is to\nbuild a strong urban community platform to help provide organizational and inclusive\ncontributions to macro-level planning.\n\n23. **With the exception of Kabul, municipalities are accountable to IDLG**, which reports\nto the President’s Office according to Presidential Decree 73 of August 2007 (The Kabul mayor\nalso reports directly to the President). IDLG is also part of the separate Urban National Priority\nProgram working group that is coordinated by the Ministry of Urban Development Affairs\n(MUDA). MUDA has the primary policy-making and urban planning role for all urban areas in\nAfghanistan (except Kabul).\n\n24. **CCAP will not be including any mapping or land titling activities directly.** However,\nurban CDCs and GAs will help with citizens’ action planning, monitoring and feedback in this\nprocess. IDLG, MUDA, land authority, Arazi and UN-Habitat are already working on several\nprojects in Kabul, Herat, Jalalabad, Kandahar, and Mazar-e-Sharif, Farah, Bamyan and Nili,\nfocused on land and property surveying for municipal revenues and issuing occupancy certificates.\n\n25. **IDLG has worked on eleven different urban development projects, together with**\n**other line ministries and donors (see Table 2.3).** Through these projects, they have developed\nsome institutional capacity enabling them to implement the urban component of the Citizens’\nCharter. They will be assisted by an OC at the beginning to further enhance their capacity.\n\n**Public Administration Reforms in MRRD and IDLG**\n\n26. **MRRD is currently undertaking an internal reorganization in line with overall public**\n**administration reforms occurring in the country especially through the CBR Program.** The\nCBR Program is an institutional development and public administration reform program launched\n\n\nPage 68 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 72
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nin 2012 by the Government and funded by the ARTF through the national budget. As part of the\nCBR program, line ministries and independent agencies are required to develop and implement\nmajor reforms to their structures, develop the capacity of civil servants, improve budget execution,\nsimplify business processes, and enhance their ability to design and implement development\nprograms independently. MRRD has prepared a reform proposal – approved already by the CBR\nSteering Committee– for managerial and organizational changes to be implemented during the\ncoming three to five years. These changes are aimed at building a strong core of civil servant staff,\nimproving efficiency and addressing structural duplication and fragmentation within the ministry.\nMRRD currently has some 2,225 civil servants or _Tashkeel_ staff and 2,500 contracted staff. Of\nthe civil service staff, 749 or 35 percent are based in the central office in Kabul and 1,476 are in\nthe provincial offices. The central office is heavily reliant on contracted staff while the provinces\nare largely the domain of career civil servants. Under the CBR-sponsored reform program, MRRD\nhas applied for 360 initial _Tashkeel_ posts and will be looking over the next 1.5 years to make the\nheads of key departments, such as Human Resources, Finance, Procurement, M&E, MIS,\nPlanning, IT, Training, Administration, Media and Public Relations, Donor Coordination, and\nEngineering services, become _Tashkeel_ staff and drawing upon these central ministerial services\nfor operational support and some technical support to the Citizens’ Charter work. For example,\nthe M&E and Finance, Administration, and HR teams working on Citizens’ Charter will be\nreporting technically to the heads of those respective departments. The 34 Provincial Directors\nwill also be under the CBR Program and will provide oversight on CCAP. All project-funded staff\nin MRRD will be under the new National Technical Assistance (NTA) scale as of July 1, 2016 and\nthe salary scales for the Citizens’ Charter/CCAP are completely aligned with the NTA scale.\n\n27. **For IDLG, it is a newly added independent agency under the CBR program, and its**\n**CBR proposal is still in preliminary stages.** In June 2016, 250 positions were approved as\n_Tashkeel_ staff, and IDLG is preparing the shift for the heads of technical departments, senior\ngovernance director, administration, and finance. It is anticipated that some key positions for each\nprovincial governor will shift over to CBR positions. All of the aforementioned positions are core\ngovernment positions, which will have some oversight role in the Citizens’ Charter\nimplementation. See following table.\n\n\nPage 69 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 73
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.3 MRRD and IDLG Professional Staff Working on Citizens’ Charter**\n\n|Level|Contract Staff
(including
advisors)|Civil Servants|TOTAL|Notes|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**MRRD**|**MRRD**|**MRRD**|**MRRD**|**MRRD**|\n|National|122|17|139|4 staff to be covered under
CBR|\n|Provincial|540|34|574|34 Provincial Directors to
be covered under CBR|\n|District (Social
Organizers &
engineers)|1,104|262|1,366|
|\n|**MRRDTotal **|**1,766 **|**313 **|**2,079**
||\n|**IDLG**
|**IDLG**
|**IDLG**
|**IDLG**
|**IDLG**
|\n|National
|44|6|50|6 staff to be covered under
CBR|\n|Municipalities
|52|12|64|16 staff to be covered
under CBR (Assistant
Mayors, Heads of
Municipal Finance, Heads
of Municipal Sectoral and
Technical depts|\n|**IDLGTotal **
|**96 **|**18 **|**114 **||\n\n\n\nPage 70 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 74
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Table 2.4: IDLG Urban Projects|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|**Brief Description of IDLG projects**|\n|**No. **|**Name of Project**|**Description of Project**|**Location**|**Project Budget**|**On/Off budge**|** tFunding Source**|** Implementing agencies**|\n|1|Afghanistan Peace and
Reintegration Program (APRP)|Capacity building and trainings to districts about
peace and reintegration process|Multiple cities|>$1 m|On Budget|Ministry of
Finance|IDLG|\n|2|Afghanistan Stabilization Program
(ASP)|Construction of provincial and district governors'
offices and other construction at the sub- national
level.|Multiple cities|> $90 m|On Budget|Ministry of
Finance|This program has now
transferred to Ministry of
Urban Development Affairs|\n|3|District Delivery Program (DDP)|Provision of the equipment to the provincial and
district governors' offices|Multiple cities|> $60 m|On Budget|Multiple Donors|This program is now closed|\n|4|Local Governance (LoGo)/UNDP|To establish national level policies, laws, systems
and mechanisms to provide and effective and
efficient framework for subnational governance.
Provide technical assistance through hiring
qualified national Afghans to the offices of the
governers, provincial councils, and municipalities.|13 Provincial Governor
offices, IDLG, and 22
Municipalities,
Including Hirat, Mazar-
e-Sharif, Jalalabad,
Kandahar, Kunduz and
few other major cities|> $54 m|Off Budget|UNDP, Multiple
Donors|IDLG, DMM, PGO's &
Municipalities|\n|5|Initiative to Strengthen Local
Administrations (ISALA)/USAID|The ISLA Project aims to strengthen the sub-
national government system in Afghanistan to
enable GIRoA to improve provincial governance
in the areas of fiscal and development planning,
representation of citizens, and enhanced delivery
of public services.
ISLA has 4 main components:
A. Provincial Planning & Budgeting
B. Sub-National Institution Building
C. Inclusive Advocacy
D. Public Engagement|16 provinces;
North: Balkh, Baghlan,
Faryab
South: Kandahar, Zabul
East:Nangarhar,
Laghman, Kunar,
West:Herat, Ghor,
Farah, Badghis
Central: Parwan,
Wardak, Logar, Ghazni|
$62 m over
5 years(
February2015 –
January 2020)|Off Budget|USAID|IDLG/DMM|\n|6|Strong Hubs for Afghan Hope and
Resilience (SHAHAR)/USAID|To improve the performance & legitimacy of
Afghan municipalities by:
- Creating well-governed, fiscally sustainable
municipalities capable of meeting the needs of a
growing urban population.
- Improving policies & procedures, transparency
& accountability, public financial management, &
community engagement & involvement in
municipal decision-making processes.|Multiple cities including
Mazar-e-Sharif, Hirat,
Jalalabad, Kandahar,
Kunduz and few other
Major cities|$ 73.5m for 3
years (2015 –
2018)|The program is
off-budget, but
the on-budget
processes will
be supported
through
SHAHAR
with MoF.|
USAID|IDLG/DMM|\n|7|Afghan Urban Peace Building
Program (AUPP)/UN-Habitat|• Improved Urban safety & security
• Community engagement in Civic
affairs/Municipal Governance|Mazar-e-sharif
Kunduz, Jalalabad
Herat, Nili, Farah
Bamyan|$ 13 m for 3 years
Started
May 2015|
Off Budget|Sweden &
Holland|IDLG/DMM, MoI & MUDA|\n|8|Local Integration of Vulnerable &
Excluded Uprooted People (LIVE
UP)/UN-Habitat|• Returnees,IDPS focused
• Provision of basic services & adequate housing|Jalalabad
Herat|$13 m for 3 years
Started January
2015|Off Budget|European Union|Min of Refugees and
Repatriations, IDLG/DMM,
ARAZI|\n|9|Community-Led Urban
infrastructure Programme
(CLUIP)/UN-Habitat|• Strengthening communities
• Establishing CDCs
• Service Delivery projects(drainage, culvert,
sidewalk, public parks etc|Herat
Mazar-e-sharif
Jalalabad
Kandahar|$ 20 m including
Kabul city, Started
April 2015|
Off Budget|Embassy of
Japan|IDLG/DMM MUDA|\n|10|Municipal Governance Support
Program (MGSP)|• Effective land Management
• Strategic Urban planning improved
• Municipal Finance system /Revenue
enhancement|Herat, Jalalabad
Kandahar, Mazar-e-
sharif, Kunduz, Farah
Nili, Bamyan|$ 14 Million for
3 years. Started
Oct 2015|Off Budget|European Union|IDLG/DMM,MUDA, ARAZI|\n|11|Future of Afghan Cities 2
nd phase|• collecting data of beyond city boundaries of five
main cities & 28 Strategic District Municipalities
• Supporting UNPP Document|5 Major Cities & 28
Strategic District
Municipalities|$ 694,000 for
1 year. Started in
Nov 2015.|Off Budget|Australia & UK|IDLG/DMM,MUDA, ARAZI,
Natl Environmental Protection
Agency, Afghanistan National
Disaster Management
Authority, Min of Economy|\n\n\nPage 71 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 75
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Financial Management**\n\n\n**Integrated Fiduciary Assessment for Preparation**\n\n28. **Background.** The Bank has gained substantial experience and understanding of the public\nFM environment in Afghanistan through the large number of projects under implementation over\nthe past years. The PFMRP II (under the series of PFMRPs) is the primary instrument to continue\nand enhance the fiduciary measures put in place during the past years to help ensure transparency\nand accountability for the funding provided by the World Bank and other donors.\n\n\n29. **A public financial management performance rating system using 28 high-level**\n**indicators, which was developed by the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability**\n**multiagency partnership program, was applied in Afghanistan in June 2005 and updated in**\n**2008 and 2013.** Afghanistan’s ratings against the public financial management performance\nindicators generally portray a public sector where financial resources are, by and large, being used\nfor their intended purposes. This has been accomplished with very high levels of support from\ninternational firms; this assistance will continue to be needed over the medium term if these ratings\nare to be maintained.\n\n\n30. **The World Bank is financing a FM advisor to assist MoF, and an audit advisor to**\n**assist SAO.** The internal audit function is being strengthened within MoF with World Bank\nfinancing. The activities carried out under the series of PFMRPs have helped the government to\nensure that appropriate fiduciary standards are maintained for public expenditures, including those\nsupported by the Bank and the donor community.\n\n\n31. **The key FM risks under the project are weak FM capacity within the civil service,**\n**and the shift from the float account arrangement (that is available to MRRD under the**\n**ongoing CDD project i.e. NSP III) that will impact on the timely processing of grant**\n**payments through the designated accounts.** While almost all Bank funded projects in\nAfghanistan follow the centralized system for payments, there are sometimes delays due to the\nlengthy processing cycle on the part of both the implementing agencies and MoF. In the past six\nmonths, MRRD and IDLG in discussions with the MoF Budget and Treasury Departments have\ngradually addressed many of the bottlenecks through a number of measures (e.g. bulk allotment\nfor contracts, streamlining the processes within MRRD, etc.). There are established service\nstandards in MoF for processing of allotments and payments, and there is strong commitment on\nthe part of MoF to adhere to these standards. MRRD and IDLG will need to ensure that the\ndocumentation sent to MoF is complete and free of errors. This requires efficient oversight and\nmanagement on the part of MRRD and IDLG, as well as effective liaison with MoF. MoF has\nbeen bringing positive internal changes gradually for better service delivery. Specifically, some\nof the mitigating measures for the identified risks are:\n\n\nPage 72 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "public financial management performance rating system",
+ "confidence": 0.8957683444023132,
+ "start": 117,
+ "end": 123
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9955170750617981,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.6417250633239746,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 167
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2005",
+ "confidence": 0.5815591216087341,
+ "start": 156,
+ "end": 157
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "public financial management performance\nindicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9675795435905457,
+ "start": 176,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.997128427028656,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "centralized system for payments",
+ "confidence": 0.5813627243041992,
+ "start": 400,
+ "end": 404
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9599106311798096,
+ "start": 397,
+ "end": 398
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MRRD",
+ "confidence": 0.9185504913330078,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDLG",
+ "confidence": 0.5310645699501038,
+ "start": 508,
+ "end": 509
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 76
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(a) Support to IDLG through the services of an OC at HQ and the provinces. Although\nIDLG has not managed a Bank-funded project before, the IDLG Finance\nDepartment staff have experience in managing other donor funded projects. Four\nfinance staff are planned for each of the four provincial offices, of which one staff\nwill be from the OC;\n\n(b) Having core MRRD finance staff in MRRD for CCAP, who will be from NSP\nFinance Department and who have long years of experience working on NSP. One\nfinance staff in each of the 34 provinces will be accounted for and report on\nprovincial fund transfers for operational expenditures. In addition, there will be one\nadministration and finance officer in each of the proposed district offices;\n\n(c) Adoption of the existing NSP accounting systems for grants and operational\nexpenditures to CCAP in MRRD and IDLG. This will ensure robust accounting\nand reporting for the project. In addition, the focal finance staff in IDLG will be\ntrained by the NSP finance staff in operating and maintaining these accounting\nsystems;\n\n(d) Processing of bulk allotments for CCAP and identification and training of two focal\nstaff in the Special Disbursement Unit (SDU) of the MoF Treasury Department on\nCCAP documentation and prioritization of CCAP payment requests;\n\n(e) Establishing a CCAP Coordination Unit within the MoF Policy Department for\ncoordination of CCAP activities with MRRD and IDLG;\n\n(f) Hiring of a Senior Finance Officer to be part of the CCAP Coordination Unit to\nspecifically coordinate and resolve FM matters and consolidate financial reporting;\nand\n\n(g) Setting up of two clearance accounts (one each for MRRD and IDLG) to facilitate\ngrants’ disbursements and reconciliation, etc.\n\nThis continues to be work in progress, and the World Bank is engaging closely with the\nimplementing agencies as well as MoF to streamline and simplify the processes.\n\n\n32. **The overall fiduciary risk for the project is rated as** _**Substantial**_ **, based on the**\n**assessment of the fiduciary arrangements in MRRD and IDLG.** The details of the assessment\nare in the following paragraphs. This rating will be reviewed at every implementation support\nmission and will be adjusted as necessary. The effectiveness of the mitigation measures will also\nbe monitored on a periodic basis, and any bottlenecks will be discussed with all relevant agencies\nin order to resolve it in a timely manner and to consider the need for any additional measures to\nfacilitate smooth implementation.\n\n\nPage 73 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 77
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Joint Fiduciary Aspects (FM and Procurement)**\n\n\n33. **Fiduciary capacity.** The overall responsibility for project FM will rest with the heads of\nthe departments in MRRD and IDLG finance departments. MRRD will assign eight focal\ncontracted staff to carry out the FM activities of CCAP. The MRRD finance staff have significant\nyears of experience working on World Bank-funded projects, although not directly involved in the\ncore financial management activities of NSP (that was managed through the Financial\nManagement Agent), which is very similar to CCAP in terms of activities to be implemented and\nFM arrangements. Given this, the eight focal staff will be key national staff from the ongoing NSP.\nIDLG will also assign focal staff for CCAP. IDLG does not have prior experience of working on\nWorld Bank-funded projects, however it has experience with other donor and government-funded\nprojects.\n\n34. **For MRRD, there will also be 34 accountants for the 34 provincial offices and 72**\n**administration and finance staff for the 72 planned district offices.** The district level\nadministration and finance staff will primarily be responsible for handling operational funds and\nwill report to the relevant PMU accountants. The PMU Accountant will in turn report to the\nOperational Fund Manager at the MRRD HQ. For IDLG, focal staff from the Finance Department\nwill be assigned to CCAP. There will be four finance staff (one from the OC) in each of the four\nprovincial offices.\n\n35. **In addition, there will be a Senior Finance Officer within the dedicated CCAP**\n**Coordination Unit to be set up within the MoF Policy Department** to oversee primarily\nfinancial, budgetary and delivery issues across the Citizens’ Charter. For the project, this Senior\nFinance Officer will have responsibility to consolidate project IFRs. The World Bank will provide\nthe required training to CCAP finance staff on the World Bank FM and disbursement requirements.\n\n36. **There is segregation of FM functions in MRRD and IDLG**, considering the internal\ncontrol framework that is applied within the line ministries. All provincial finance staff will report\nto a focal finance staff at the central level, who in turn will report to the Head of the Finance\nDepartment in the respective agencies.\n\n37. **Planning and budgeting.** Annual project budgets for MRRD and IDLG will be prepared\nin line with the MoF regulations and according to the Afghanistan fiscal year. Project budget will\nbe prepared on the basis of the procurement plan and work plan. A robust budget monitoring\nmechanism will be followed by maintaining a detailed budget broken down by funding source\n(IDA, ARTF and others) and period. The quarterly IFRs will compare actual expenditures to\nbudgeted expenditures, and explain significant variances. MoF will ensure that temporary budget\nat the beginning of the fiscal years will be provided while the new budget is pending approval.\nBulk allotments will be processed by the MoF Budget Department for the grants.\n\n38. **Internal control (including internal audit).** The internal control mechanism at the central\nand implementing agency levels is acceptable. MRRD and IDLG will ensure that the processing\n\n\nPage 74 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 78
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ncycle for allotments (B27 form) and payment requests (M16 form) is streamlined to avoid delays.\nThese timelines will be monitored by the IAs and reviewed by the Bank during implementation\nsupport missions. There will be a FM manual for CCAP (covering both MRRD and IDLG), to be\nreviewed and approved by the Bank by Oct 31, 2016. This manual will include details on the FM\narrangements and disbursements procedures, including but not limited to staffing arrangements at\nvarious levels (HQ, provincial and district), reporting lines, coordination arrangements between\nMRRD, IDLG, and MoF, disbursement arrangements, simplified allotment and payment processes\napplied by MoF for CCAP, documents retention and control mechanism at various levels,\noversight arrangements, service standards for document processing, payment triggers,\ndocumentation requirements for grants, and key performance indicators for project FM. There is\na robust FM manual under NSP; this will be updated for CCAP. At the central level, there is a\nTreasury Accounting Manual applied across the government.\n\n\n39. **The internal audit for the World Bank-funded and administered projects is being**\n**carried out by MoF’s Internal Audit Department** . This arrangement has been in place since\nFY1393. MRRD and IDLG also have their internal audit departments that carry out periodic\nreviews, although the scope of such reviews is largely restricted to the central level. Given the\nscope and complexity of this project, a technical audit for the project is proposed. The periodicity\nand specific terms of reference will be agreed during implementation. Alternatively, if the third\nparty monitoring arrangement will cover this project, it may be considered to expand the scope of\nwork under the contract. The internal audit reports will be shared with the Bank during project\nsupervision, and MRRD and IDLG will ensure that the observations from the audit are addressed\nsatisfactorily in a timely manner.\n\n\n40. **Fixed assets register will be maintained by MRRD and IDLG for assets purchased**\n**from project funds.** Assets will be coded and a system of annual physical inventory will be\nmaintained. All project bank accounts (including the clearance accounts) will be reconciled by\nMRRD and IDLG at least on a monthly basis with AFMIS and DAB records. Robust procedures\nfor transfer of operational funds to the provinces, accounting and reporting, and acquittal\nprocedures will be established. More details will be included in the project FM manual.\n\n**Governance and Oversight Arrangements**\n\n41. **Audit arrangements - external audit of project financial statements** . The SAO, with\nsupport from the Audit Agent, carries out the annual audit for all Bank-funded and administered\nprojects; it will also be responsible for annual audits of this project. Annual audited project\nfinancial statements will be submitted within six months of the close of the government’s fiscal\nyear [25] (December 21 to December 20). The financial statements for the project audit will be\nprepared by MoF based on AFMIS records. There is a common term of reference (ToR) for the\naudit of all projects that is reviewed by the Bank on a yearly basis.\n\n42. **Technical audit reviews.** As explained earlier, a technical audit for the project is proposed\ngiven the scope and complexity of the project. The periodicity and specific terms of reference will\n\n25 Current fiscal year is 1395 and covers the period December 22, 2015 to December 21, 2016.\n\n\nPage 75 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 79
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nbe agreed during implementation. Alternatively, if the third party monitoring arrangement will\ncover this project, it may be considered to expand the scope of work under the contract.\n\n**FM Considerations in the Fiduciary Assessment**\n\n43. **Funds flow.** Project funds will flow through segregated designated accounts set up for the\nproject in Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB: Central Bank) and controlled by MoF. Three designated\naccounts (1 under IDA and 2 under ARTF) will be set up for the implementing agencies, MRRD\nand IDLG. MoF will also set up three clearance accounts in AFN (one for each designated\naccount), into which the grants will be transferred from DAs before being transferred to the\nbeneficiaries’ bank accounts maintained with DAB. This will aid the reconciliation process for\ngrants’ transfers and reversals, if any. As CDCs may receive funds from multiple sources, MRRD\nand IDLG have agreed with DAB to have sub accounts set up (that will be linked to the main\naccount) to segregate the funds and enable CDCs to efficiently account and report for funds from\nsegregated sources. This arrangement will be formalized through a Memorandum of\nUnderstanding.\n\n44. **All project expenditures are expected to be paid centrally, except for some operational**\n**expenditures at the provincial and district levels.** MRRD and IDLG will prepare annual\nestimates of operational fund requirements for each of the 34 and 4 provincial offices respectively\n(including districts as applicable). The funds will be channeled to the provinces through MRRD\nand IDLG HQ (similar to the arrangement under the ongoing NSP). With a view to gradually\nmainstream all funds flow to the government system, the project will also use the _mastufiat_ channel\nto transfer funds to 1-2 provinces. It is expected that gradually over time, the use of _mastufiat_\nsystem will cover more provinces for the project. Petty and operational cash imprest for the project\n(for each ministry) will be limited to a maximum of US$15,000 as per an earlier agreement\nbetween the World Bank and MoF. Any increase to this limit, if justified, will have to be approved\nby the World Bank and communicated to MoF.\n\n45. **Advances will be made to the DAs, and disbursements from the grant will be made**\n**using advances, reimbursements and direct payments.** The project will follow IFR based\ndisbursement arrangements. The advances to the DAs will be a floating amount based on the\nforecasts provided in the IFRs. Further details of disbursement arrangements for the project,\nincluding supporting documentation requirements, are spelled out in the Disbursement Letter.\n\n46. **All payments from the DAs will be made through check or bank transfer.** Requests\nfor payments from DA funds will be made to the SDU in MoF’s Treasury Department by MRRD\nand IDLG. In the SDU, two focal staff will be identified and trained in CCAP documentation\nrequirements to ensure smooth processing of payment requests on a priority basis. In addition to\npayments from the DAs, requests can also be submitted for direct payments from the grant. All\nwithdrawal applications to the Bank, including advances, reimbursement and direct payment\napplications will be prepared by MRRD and IDLG, and submitted by MoF. The project will be\n100 percent financed by the IDA and ARTF grants (as per table below), inclusive of taxes, covering\n\n\nPage 76 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 80
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ngrants, goods, works, non-consulting services, consulting services, training and workshop, and\nincremental operating costs.\n\n\n**Table 2.5: IDA and ARTF Financing by Category of Expenditures**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Category|Amount of
IDA Grant
(in US$
millions)|Amount of
ARTF
Grant (in
US$
millions)|Percentage of
expenditures to be
financed|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services,
and consultants’ services, Training and
Incremental Operating Costs incurred by
MRRD under Parts 2, 3 and 4 of the Project|
|$185.70|100%|\n|(2) Rural Area Service Standards Grants|
100.00|$124.30|100% of the amounts
disbursed by MRRD for
carrying out subprojects|\n|(3) Goods, works, non-consulting services,
and consultants’ services, Training and
Incremental Operating Costs incurred by
IDLG under Parts 2, 3 and 4 of the Project;
and Urban Area Block Grants|
|
$90.00|100% of the amounts
disbursed by IDLG for
carrying out subprojects|\n|
**TOTAL**
|
**100.00**|**400.00**||\n\n\n\nPage 77 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 81
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Diagram 2.2: Funds Flow Chart**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n47. The funds flow process for the grants to the CDCs/ CCDCs/ GAs is quite straightforward as\ndepicted in the above chart; there are a number of measures to ensure that the funds flow smoothly\nand in a timely manner such as:\n\n(a) MRRD and IDLG will process batch payment requests for the grants (i.e. single M16\nform covering multiple CDCs/CCDCs/GAs);\n(b) SDU focal staff for the CCAP project will prioritize the payment requests. These staff\nwould be specifically trained on CCAP documentation requirements to ensure smooth\nprocessing;\n(c) DAB upon receiving the transfer request from MoF will move the required funds from\nthe DAs to the respective clearance accounts for each designated account. Thereafter,\nthe funds will be transferred to the bank accounts of the CDCs/ CCDCs/ GAs.\n(d) The clearance accounts are maintained only for the grants’ transfers and the purpose\nof the clearance accounts is to aid reconciliation. Funds transferred into the clearance\n\n\nPage 78 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 82
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\naccounts should be transferred out within 1-3 days and the account should be zeroed\nout. Funds remaining in the clearance accounts for longer will mean the funds have\nnot reached the intended beneficiaries and will help MRRD/ IDLG to timely follow\nup. MRRD/ IDLG will have access to the clearance account bank statements on a\ndaily basis.\n(e) Monitoring at the provincial level of the funds transfers through reconciliation of the\nbatch transfer requests with the funds received by the CDCs/ CCDCs/ GAs.\n\n48. Maintenance of sub accounts (linked to a main account) by DAB for the CDCs will enable\nthe latter to efficiently reconcile, account and report in a segregated manner for the funds received\nfrom different sources (for example, different ministries under the broader Citizens’ Charter\nprogram of the government).\n\n49. **Retroactive financing of US$2 million will be provided under the ARTF** for eligible\nexpenditures paid before the signing date but on or after June 1, 2016.\n\n50. **Further advances in cash from the DAs up to a maximum of US$15,000 may be**\n**withdrawn and maintained by MRRD and IDLG.** The actual amount of funds to be maintained\nas imprest, if needed, will be based on project needs and will be reviewed by the Bank. Such\nimprest funds will be subject to adequate petty cash management procedures (for custody, control,\nlimits, physical cash verification, and replenishment). The custodian of the imprest cash will be\nthe cashiers in MRRD and IDLG.\n\n51. **Accounting.** All accounting is centralized in the AFMIS in MoF. Subsidiary books of\nproject records, such as bank book, cash book, contract register, asset register, record of grant\ntransfers and utilization, etc., will be maintained by MRRD and IDLG. Given that CCAP is similar\nto NSP, the existing systems used under NSP for grants (in-house MIS) and other expenditures\n(off-the-shelf accounting software) will be adopted for CCAP. It has also been agreed between\nIDLG and MRRD that the same systems will be replicated in IDLG. MRRD/NSP finance staff\nwith the experience of operating these systems will provide training to the IDLG CCAP focal staff\nin the use of these systems. These systems will also track receipts and expenditures under each\nfunding source if CCAP receives multiple sources of funding. Cash basis of accounting will be\nfollowed for the project.\n\n52. **Financial reporting.** Consolidated quarterly IFRs will be required for the project. These\nreports will be submitted in form and substance agreed with the World Bank. The reports will have\nto be submitted to the Bank within 45 days from the end of the quarter (Dec 20, Mar 20, Jun 20\nand Sep 20) as per the government fiscal year. MRRD and IDLG will each prepare the IFRs for\ntheir relevant activities and disbursements and share it with the MoF Citizens’ Charter dedicated\nunit. The Senior Finance Officer who will be part of this unit will be responsible to consolidate\nthe IFR for submission to the World Bank. The IFRs will include the Statement of Cash Receipts\nand Payments, Statement of Uses of Funds by Project Activity, bank and advances reconciliation,\nand the bank statements. Customized formats for CCAP were shared prior to negotiations.\n\n\nPage 79 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 83
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n53. **With the above arrangements in place, the residual FM risk is rated as** _**Substantial**_ **.**\nReview of the risks will be carried out during implementation support missions with a view to\nadjust the risk ratings if necessary.\n\n54. There are no overdue audit reports, no overdue IFRs nor ineligible expenditures under\nongoing or closed projects implemented by MRRD or IDLG.\n\n55. **Monitoring of fiduciary performance and implementation support plan.** While IDLG\nhas experience working on donor-funded projects, it has not implemented a Bank-funded project\nbefore. The risk factor is the limited knowledge of the World Bank FM procedures and\nrequirements among the IDLG finance staff. The World Bank will provide the required training\nand hands-on support to enable the IDLG FM staff to become familiar with the requirements.\n\n56. The fiduciary performance will be assessed through the following indicators: (i) timely and\nquality submission of quarterly IFRs; (ii) maintenance of adequate books of records and supporting\ndocuments of project transactions; (iii) timely submission of audited financial statements; (iv)\ntimely resolution of FM issues raised during Bank supervision, internal audit, external audit, and\nany other reviews; (v) maintenance of adequate internal controls; (vi) timely processing of\nallotments and payment requests and project expenditures; (vii) adherence to service standards,\netc. The World Bank will carry out two FM reviews annually. The implementation support will\ninclude monitoring of fiduciary performance based on identified indicators, review of IFRs and\naudit reports, review of compliance with legal covenants, review of progress on agreed actions,\nand review of FM risks.\n\n\n**Procurement**\n\n\n**Procurement Arrangements for MRRD and IDLG**\n\n57. **The following relates only to the procurements to be undertaken by MRRD and IDLG**\n**for CCAP** and not to the procurements for the remaining wider Citizens’ Charter that will be\nundertaken by various line ministries.\n\n58. **Procurement for the project will be carried out in accordance with the World Bank’s**\n**“Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits” (updated July 1, 2014),**\n**“Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers”**\n**(updated July 1, 2014), and the provisions stipulated in the Financing Agreement.** In addition,\nthe World Bank’s “Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Corruption in Projects Financed by\nIBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants” (dated October 15, 2006) has been shared with the\nrecipient. The World Bank’s Standard Bidding Documents (SBDs), Requests for Proposals, and\nForms of Consultant Contract will be used. Civil works and goods following National Competitive\n\n\nPage 80 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8696722388267517,
+ "start": 76,
+ "end": 78
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Monitoring of fiduciary performance",
+ "confidence": 0.6755846738815308,
+ "start": 100,
+ "end": 104
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7820730805397034,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.8507958650588989,
+ "start": 81,
+ "end": 82
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5367894172668457,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.6566816568374634,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring of fiduciary performance",
+ "confidence": 0.778245210647583,
+ "start": 297,
+ "end": 301
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.9222704768180847,
+ "start": 308,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7143566012382507,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 312
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5665920972824097,
+ "start": 411,
+ "end": 413
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Standard Bidding Documents",
+ "confidence": 0.7367652058601379,
+ "start": 524,
+ "end": 527
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9180668592453003,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Requests for Proposals",
+ "confidence": 0.5519238710403442,
+ "start": 531,
+ "end": 534
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9319564700126648,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 84
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nBidding (NCB) procedures shall be procured using the agreed SBDs for Afghanistan. In case of\nconflict or contradiction between the World Bank’s procurement procedures and any national rules\nand regulations, the World Bank’s procurement procedures will take precedence in accordance\nwith general conditions of the financing agreement and also provided in the Article 4(2) of the\nProcurement Law July 2008 (Amendments in January 2009 and incorporated in October 2015) of\nthe Government.\n\n59. **With donor assistance, Afghanistan has made considerable efforts to establish the**\n**legal and regulatory framework for public procurement over the last five years.** The “Rules\nof Procedure for Public Procurement,” which details the better implementation of the Procurement\nLaw, has been issued by MOF as circular number PPU/COO5/1386 dated April 12, 2007. The\nProcurement Appeal and Review mechanism is in place and the Manual of Procedures for\n“Procurement Appeal and Review” has been issued by MOF as circular number PPU/NOO1/1385\non March 18, 2007. The Procurement Law has been revised in July 2008 and amended in January\n2009 and issued as a new Law by the Ministry of Justice and was published in the Official Gazette\nNumber 957, 29.10.1387 (January 18, 2009). The revised “Rules of Procedures for Public\nProcurement” has been issued as circular PPU/CO27/1387 of November 18, 2009. The National\nProcurement Agency (NPA) and the National Procurement Committee (NPC) have been\nestablished. NPA reviews all procurement above a certain threshold, and NPC reviews and\napproves all contract awards above a certain threshold.\n\n**General Procurement for CCAP**\n\n60. **The procurement activities of CCAP in rural areas will be managed by the MRRD**\n**Procurement Directorate** . The Directorate comprises both civil servants and contracted staff\nfrom the various programs it executes. A significant portion of staff now included in the\nDirectorates underwent such procurement assessments in their previous roles in the procurement\ndepartments of the various MRRD programs. The Directorate currently has separate units for\nprocurement of goods and non-consultant services, procurement for works, inventory and\nwarehousing management, and contracts management. When the NSP Procurement Department\nis integrated into the Directorate, these NSP procurement staff will fall into a new unit dedicated\nto procurement of consultancy services. Most of the department staff have had procurement related\ntrainings, being trained variously from the World Bank, Afghanistan’s Civil Service Institute, and\nthe former Public Procurement Unit (PPU).\n\n61. **The procurement activities of CCAP in urban areas will be managed by IDLG’s**\n**Procurement Directorate and the dedicated procurement team for this program.** These\ncomprise both civil servants and contracted staff. The directorate has different sections, such as\nprocurement of goods, non-consultancy services, works, assets and inventory, and contracts\nmanagement. The procurement staff have received various trainings from NPA and the\nAfghanistan Civil Service Institute.\n\n\nPage 81 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SBDs",
+ "confidence": 0.8667083382606506,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9816356897354126,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "General Procurement for CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5603704452514648,
+ "start": 331,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "MOF",
+ "confidence": 0.5773417949676514,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2007",
+ "confidence": 0.5382201075553894,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.896880567073822,
+ "start": 392,
+ "end": 394
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 85
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Procurement of Works**\n\n62. **The procurement of works referred here does not include any works covered under**\n**the community procurement mentioned below.** While not foreseen, any civil works\nprocurement under CCAP (beyond that for the communities using investment grants) will fall in\nthis category. Such procurement will be done using the World Bank's SBD for all International\nCompetitive Bidding (ICB) and national bidding documents agreed with or found satisfactory by\nthe World Bank.\n\n**Procurement of Goods and Non-Consulting Services**\n\n63. **Procurement of goods will include the \"framework and long term agreements\" for**\n**office furniture, office and IT equipment, vehicles, etc.** Non-consulting service procurements\nwill include repair/ servicing of office and IT equipment, vehicles, internet services, software\nlicensing/ development agreements, etc. Procurement of goods will be done using the World\nBank’s SBD for goods for all contracts following ICB procedures. National bidding documents\nwill be used for procurement of goods following NCB procedures. Shopping shall be in accordance\nwith paragraph 3.5 of the Bank’s Guidelines. Goods that meet the requirements of paragraph 3.7\nof the World Bank Procurement Guidelines may be procured following direct contracting\nprocedures with prior agreement with the World Bank.\n\n**Selection of Consultants**\n\n64. **The proposed grant will finance several consultancy assignments.** The selection\nmethods applicable for consultants are QCBS, QBS, CQS, LCS, FBS, and SSS for firms as per\nSection V of the Bank’s Guidelines. Selection of the UN agency, such as UN Habitat, will be\nconducted on an SSS basis.\n\n**The main activity under consultant selection will be the contracting of** **FPs.** MRRD has\nprevious experience of having procured such contracts for NSP and several similar contracts are\nunder implementation.\n\n**Community Participation in Procurement**\n\n65. **All procurement for funds channeled directly to CDCs (whether as part of the**\n**proposed regular fiscal transfers or as part of the MRRD-CCAP investment window) shall**\n**be in line with the “Guidance Note for Design and Management of Procurement**\n**Responsibilities in CDC Projects,” dated March 15, 2012.** The community basic accounting\nand procurement manuals, policies, procedural guidelines and forms utilized under NSP will be\nrevised and updated (in consultation with the requirements of MoF as agreed with the World Bank)\nand will be used for this project. It should be noted that there is a high level of illiteracy in Afghan\nrural and urban communities, and with the reduced time inputs proposed for FPs, the paper work\nand other requirements for community-level procurement and accounting need to be kept at a\n\n\nPage 82 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5327439308166504,
+ "start": 60,
+ "end": 61
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6326168179512024,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6811717748641968,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SBD for goods",
+ "confidence": 0.5442370772361755,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 199
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World\nBank",
+ "confidence": 0.8114938139915466,
+ "start": 192,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National bidding documents",
+ "confidence": 0.5588429570198059,
+ "start": 206,
+ "end": 209
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World\nBank",
+ "confidence": 0.6061812043190002,
+ "start": 192,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.6922712922096252,
+ "start": 372,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.5667432546615601,
+ "start": 457,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community basic accounting\nand procurement manuals",
+ "confidence": 0.5753678679466248,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghan\nrural and urban communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7258760929107666,
+ "start": 519,
+ "end": 524
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 86
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nminimum but acceptable level. Any goods, works and non-consulting services contract can be\nprocured by CDCs following community procurement as per paragraph 3.19 of the World Bank’s\nProcurement Guidelines and provisions of the Operations Manual, which will be prepared by the\nrespective IAs and agreed by the World Bank. The community procurement under US$3,000 can\nuse SSS, for goods any value up to US$50,000 can use competitive shopping, and any value above\nUS$50,000 will use NCB. For works any value up to US$100,000 can use competitive shopping,\nand any value above US$100,000 will use NCB. Further guidelines shall be provided in a\ndedicated section on procurement and contracts management in the Operations Manual.\n\n**Capacity Building for Community Procurement**\n\n66. **For CDCs/CCDCs/GAs.** The capacity building for procurement for the community\ninstitutions (CDCs, CCDCs, GAs and/or their project management sub-committees) will be\nundertaken by the FPs contracted by MRRD and IDLG. The training materials will be\ncontextualized (as in NSP) to suit the realities of the field, i.e. low literacy levels, etc. The materials\nwill be prepared by the CCAP central units of the implementing agencies. It will then be rolled\nout in a cascade manner: Capacity Building Department at HQ will train a set of dedicated master\ntrainers among all the contracted FPs and the CCAP provincial managers and trainers. The FP\nmaster trainers will be responsible for training their Social Organizers, and the PMU trainers will\nbe responsible for training their engineers and Social Organizers in their respective provinces. The\nFP Social Organizers and the PMU engineers will then train CDCs, CCDCs, and GAs on the\nprescribed procurement policies, best practices, guidelines and forms to be used. PMU engineers\nwill also mentor them in actual procurement activities when being conducted. The rollout for this\nis planned as follows:\n\n - Preparation in capacity building – October - November 2016;\n\n - Training of trainers (ToTs 1) – Master trainers and PMs – December 2016;\n\n - Training of Social Organizers and engineers (ToTs 2) – January 2017;\n\n - Rollout of training to communities – February to June 2017; and\n\n - Actual procurement mentoring – June 2017 to June 2019.\n\n**Capacity Building for Procurement Staff**\n\n67. **Both IDLG and MRRD have their own Procurement Directorates/departments.** In the\ncase of MRRD, the current Directorate is relatively new. The earlier Directorate was limited to\nMRRD procurement only while each of MRRD’s programs had their own procurement\ndepartments. Recently the program procurement departments have been merged into the MRRD\nprocurement directorate. As such, a clear structure has yet to be worked out in detail. The\nDirectorate is lacking a consultancy procurement unit; however, it hopes that the Directorate will\nbe complete when the NSP Procurement Department is merged with the Directorate in the future.\n\n68. **The procurement related trainings received by the staff shall be mentioned briefly in**\n**the Operations Manual.** It is proposed to agree on a common assessment form that is partially\ncompleted by each staff of the Directorate and partially assessed by his/her direct supervisor. An\n\n\nPage 83 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Operations Manual",
+ "confidence": 0.5715211629867554,
+ "start": 54,
+ "end": 56
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.5070280432701111,
+ "start": 176,
+ "end": 177
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SSS",
+ "confidence": 0.7111202478408813,
+ "start": 83,
+ "end": 84
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6043986082077026,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6998510360717773,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.9496501088142395,
+ "start": 228,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "common assessment form",
+ "confidence": 0.6958014369010925,
+ "start": 613,
+ "end": 616
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 87
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nannual training calendar will be prepared by the IAs and agreed with the World Bank at the\nbeginning of June every year. The first training calendar was agreed upon during project appraisal.\nHowever, since IDLG has low procurement capacity to carry out the World Bank funded projects,\nthey will immediately nominate their procurement staff for procurement training.\n\n69. **A three-tiered procurement capacity building program is planned for the two**\n**directorates during the CCAP period, which is outlined below.** The tier-1 is high level and very\nspecialized trainings; tier-2 is more general but procurement focused and aims at mid-level; and\ntier-3 is general for junior level staff only. The table below summarizes the procurement capacity\nbuilding program.\n\n\nPage 84 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 88
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.6: Procurement Capacity Building Program**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Tier|Focus Areas|Core Trainers|Core
Trainees|Estimated
# of
trainees|Will be
cascaded?|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|1|WB procurement (goods,
works, consultancy and
non-consultancy services)|World
Bank
Procurement
Team/ Training
Institutions|Heads of units
and
senior
officer levels|15|Yes,
but
in
simplified
manner
|\n|1|Afghanistan Procurement
Law, NPA/NPC notices
and guidelines|NPA|Heads of units
and senior
officer levels|15|Yes, but in
simplified
manner
|\n|1|Contracts management|World Bank
Procurement
Team /Training
Institutions|Relevant unit|15|No|\n|1|Online Systematic
Tracking of Exchanges in
Procurement (STEP)|World Bank
Procurement
Team|Heads of units
and senior
officer levels|15|DONE
Yes, but in
simplified
manner
|\n|2|International good
practices and lessons
learned in procurement
implementation|World Bank
Procurement
Team|Officers and
junior officer
levels|20|No|\n|2|Community procurement
guidelines as ToT|CCAP –MRRD
Capacity
Development
Department|Officers and
junior officer
levels|20|Yes to PMUs|\n|3|Warehousing, inventory
and asset management|Local training
institutes|Officers and
junior officer
levels|15|No|\n|3|Computer literacy/
Microsoft Office|Local training
institutes|Officers and
junior officer
levels|15|No|\n|1,2,3|The Bank’s Online
Certificate Program in
Public Procurement|Online|All relevant
officers and
staff including
contracted
staff working
on project|50|No|\n|1,2,3|The Bank’s Online
Certificate Program in
Contracts Management|Online|All relevant
officers and
staff including
contracted
staff working
on project|50|No|\n\n\nPage 85 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 89
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n70. **Incremental Operating Costs** . The costs, which are financed by the project, will be\nprocured using the implementing agency’s administrative procedures. The incremental operating\ncosts will include operations and maintenance of equipment and vehicles, hiring of vehicles, hiring\nof contracted staff, office rent, costs of consumable, fuel, office utilities and supplies, bank charges,\ntravel and transportation costs for official domestic and international travel, training and\nworkshops, and advertising expenses, but exclude any salaries and allowances of civil servants.\n\n71. **Procurement Plans** . MRRD and IDLG have developed their PPs for project\nimplementation that provides the basis for the procurement methods. The new online STEP is in\nuse and the staff have undergone training on the use of the new system. The PPs will be updated\nin agreement with the project team annually or as required to reflect the actual project\nimplementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.\n\n72. **Procurement and Contracts Management Sections of the Operations Manual** . The\nIAs will develop procurement and contracts management sections of the Operations Manual for\nthe procurement, which will be carried out by the IAs. The Operations Manual will have separate\nsection on simplified community basic accounting and procurement and contracts management\nmanuals, policies, procedural guidelines and forms for the community procurement. The section\nfor community procurement will be translated in local language(s) used by the CDC members and\ndisseminated to the CDCs before they can start the procurement.\n\n73. **Procurement Risk Assessment** . Based on the information gathered through the\nquestionnaire and followed by detailed discussions with the IAs, the procurement risk assessment\nwas carried out using PRAMS. In close consultation with the IAs, a mitigation plan has been\nprepared for implementation. MRRD is an experienced IA and has been rated to have Substantial\nprocurement risk, while IDLG as the first time IA for the World Bank funded projects has been\nrated as having High procurement risk. The overall procurement risk for the project is\n_**SUBSTANTIAL**_ as the ratio of the World Bank financing to MRRD and IDLG is 82 percent and\n18 percent respectively. The detailed procurement risk matrix and agreed mitigation measures are\npresented in Table 2.10: Integrated Fiduciary Assessment (MRRD).\n\n74. During the implementation support missions, the progress on the implementation of risk\nmitigation measures will be reviewed, and the procurement risks will be reassessed. The risk\nmatrix and procurement risk rating will be updated accordingly.\n\n75. **Frequency of Procurement Supervision.** In addition to the prior review, supervision\nshall be carried out from Bank offices. Initially there will be two usual implementation support\nmissions with the task team. In addition, there will be one procurement implementation support\nmeeting with IDLG. Once both the IAs complete the first year of capacity building plan and start\nimplementing the procurement in a reasonable manner, there will be usual two implementation\nsupport missions per annum.\n\n\nPage 86 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PPs",
+ "confidence": 0.8566527962684631,
+ "start": 131,
+ "end": 132
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7918684482574463,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Risk Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.6937666535377502,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "questionnaire",
+ "confidence": 0.604962170124054,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IAs",
+ "confidence": 0.5825970768928528,
+ "start": 321,
+ "end": 322
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "questionnaire",
+ "confidence": 0.8256725668907166,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.7171775698661804,
+ "start": 288,
+ "end": 289
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement risk matrix",
+ "confidence": 0.6905730962753296,
+ "start": 423,
+ "end": 426
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "risk\nmatrix",
+ "confidence": 0.9867406487464905,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 477
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.9577938914299011,
+ "start": 478,
+ "end": 481
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 90
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n76. **Procurement Audit.** In addition to prior review, the Bank staff or Bank appointed\nconsultant can carry out post procurement audit once per annum and independent procurement\nreview as needed.\n\n\n**Table 2.7: Summary of Procurement Arrangements for MRRD**\n**(Procurement Risk: SUBSTANTIAL)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Expenditure
category|Contract value
threshold
(US$)|Procurement
method|Contracts subject to prior review|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Works|>5 million|ICB|First Contract and All contracts
above US$10 million|\n|Works|>100,000 and ≤5 million|NCB|First contract|\n|Works|≤100,000|Shopping|N/A|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|>200,000|ICB|First contract and all contracts
above US$1 million|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|>50,000 and ≤200,000|NCB|First contract|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|≤ 50,000|Shopping|N/A|\n|
Consulting
(firms)|>1 million|QCBS/FBS/
CQS*/LCS/SSS|All contracts|\n|
Consulting
(firms)|≤ 1 million
|QCBS/FBS/
CQS*/LCS/S
SS|All single source contracts above
US$50,000; and first contract for
each selection method|\n|Consulting
(individuals)||Section V in
the Guidelines|All cases above US$200,000 and all
single-source
contracts
above
US$50,000.|\n|Direct
contracting|||All cases above US$50,000|\n\n\n\n**Note:** - indicates that Under CQS method of selection of consultant, the contract size will not exceed US$300,000,\nunless specifically agreed in procurement plan with due justification.\n\n\nPage 87 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 91
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.8: Summary of Procurement Arrangements for IDLG**\n\n\n**(Procurement Risk: HIGH)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Expenditure
category|Contract value
threshold
(US$)|Procurement
method|Contracts subject to prior review|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Works|>5 million|ICB|All contracts|\n|Works|>100,000 and ≤5 million|NCB|First contract|\n|Works|≤100,000|Shopping|N/A|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|>200,000|ICB|First contract and all contracts
above US$1.5 million|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|>50,000 and ≤200,000|NCB|First contract|\n|Goods, IT
Systems and
non-consulting
services|≤ 50,000|Shopping|N/A|\n|
Consulting
(firms)|> 500,000|QCBS/FBS/
CQS*/LCS/SSS|All contracts|\n|
Consulting
(firms)|≤ 500,000
|QCBS/FBS/
CQS*/LCS/S
SS|All single source contracts above
US$50,000; and first contract for
each selection method|\n|Consulting
(individuals)||Section V in
the Guidelines|All cases above US$200,000 and all
single-source
contracts
above
US$50,000.|\n|Direct
contracting|||All cases above US$50,000|\n\n\n\n**Note:** - indicates that Under CQS method of selection of consultant, the contract size will not exceed US$300,000\nunless specifically agreed in procurement plan with due justification.\n\n77. **Short list comprising entirely national consultants** : A short list of consultants for\nservices, estimated to cost less than US$100,000 equivalent per contract, may comprise entirely of\nnational consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant\nGuidelines.\n\n78. **Agreed Procedures for National Competitive Bidding:**\n\n\n(a) Standard bidding documents approved by the Bank shall be used;\n(b) Invitations to bid shall be advertised in at least one widely circulated national daily\nnewspaper and bidding documents shall be made available to prospective bidders\nat least 28 days prior to the deadline for the submission of bids;\n(c) Bids shall not be invited on the basis of percentage premium or discount over the\nestimated cost;\n(d) Bidding documents shall be made available, by mail or in person, to all who are\nwilling to pay the required fee;\n(e) Foreign bidders shall not be precluded from bidding;\n(f) Qualification criteria (in case pre-qualifications were not carried out) shall be stated\non the bidding documents, and if a registration process is required, a foreign firm\ndetermined to be the lowest evaluated bidder shall be given a reasonable\nopportunity of registering, without any hindrance;\n\n\nPage 88 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 92
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(g) Bidders may deliver bids at their option either in person, by courier service, or by\nmail;\n(h) All bidders shall provide bid security or a bid security declaration form as indicated\nin the bidding documents. A bidder’s bid security or the declaration form shall\napply only to a specific bid;\n(i) Bids shall be opened in public in one place preferably immediately, but no later\nthan one hour, after the deadline for submission of bids;\n(j) Evaluation of bids shall be made in strict adherence to the criteria disclosed in the\nbidding documents, in a format, and within the specified period, agreed with the\nBank;\n(k) Bids shall not be rejected merely on the basis of a comparison with an official\nestimate without the prior concurrence of the Bank;\n(l) Split award or lottery in award of contracts shall not be carried out. When two or\nmore bidders quote the same price, an investigation shall be made to determine any\nevidence of collusion, following which: (i) if collusion is determined, the parties\ninvolved shall be disqualified and the award shall then be made to the next lowest\nevaluated and qualified bidder; and (ii) if no evidence of collusion can be\nconfirmed, then fresh bids shall be invited after receiving the concurrence of the\nBank;\n(m) Contracts shall be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidders within the initial period\nof bid validity so that extensions are not necessary. Extension of bid validity may\nbe sought only under exceptional circumstances;\n(n) Extension of bid validity shall not be allowed without the prior concurrence of the\nBank: (i) for the first request for extension if it is longer than four weeks; and (ii)\nfor all subsequent requests for extensions irrespective of the period in case of prior\nreview;\n(o) Negotiations shall not be allowed with the lowest evaluated or any other bidders;\n(p) Re-bidding shall not be carried out without the Bank’s prior concurrence in case of\nprior review; and\n(q) All contractors or suppliers shall provide performance security as indicated in the\ncontract documents. A contractor’s or a supplier’s performance security shall apply\nto a specific contract under which it was furnished.\n\n79. **Procurement complaints will be handled through the main project grievance redress**\n**mechanism for CCAP.** Complaints can be sent to the district, province or national levels,\naccordingly.\n\n_**Initial Procurement Plan**_\n\n80. The Implementing Agencies have received training in use of Systematic Tracking of\nExchanges in Procurement (STEP) and will use the same under the project. The\nprocurement plan will be prepared by the implementing agencies using the STEP tool.\nThe initial procurement plan is agreed with the IAs and as follows.\n\n\nPage 89 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 93
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n**Table 2.9. Summary Table of Major Contracts to be Procured under the Project for Goods**\n**and Consultancy Services**\n\n**A.** **Ministry of Reconstruction and Rural Development (MRRD)**\n\n**Goods**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Description**|
**Estimated**
**Cost**
**(U$S**
**million)**|**Procure-**
**ment**
**Method**|**Domestic**
**Preference**
**(Yes/No)**|**Review**
** by Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**date for**
**Invitation**
**for bidding**|\n|1|CCEP-
I/MRRD/GDS/GDS-1 /
Office & IT equipment|0.58|ICB|Yes|Post|Nov 15,
2016|\n|2|CCEP-
I/MRRD/GDS/GDS-2 /
Office furniture|0.31|ICB|Yes|Prior|Nov 15,
2016|\n|3|CCEP-
I/MRRD/GDS/GDS-6 /
Engineering Equipment|0.31|ICB|Yes|Post|Nov 15,
2016|\n||**Total**|**1.2**|||||\n\n\n\n**Consulting Services**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Description of Assignment**|
**Estimated**
**Cost**
**(U$S million) **|
**Selection**
**Method**|**Review by**
**Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|
**Expected**
**RFP**
**Issuance**
**date**|\n|1|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-7 / Facilitation
Partner - 7 (Bamyan, Daikundi)|3.45|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|2|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-12 / Facilitation
Partner - 12 (Kabul, Logar, Wardak)|5.47|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|3|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-13 / Facilitation
Partner - 13 (Ghazni, Paktika)|6.31|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|4|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-5 / Facilitation
Partner - 5 (Badghis, Faryab)|3.21|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|5|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-9 / Facilitation
Partner - 9 (Takhar, Badakshan)|6.86|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|6|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-4 / Facilitation
Partner - 4 (Ghor, Hirat)|6.76|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|7|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-10 / Facilitation
Partner - 10 (Kapisa, Panjshir, Parwan)|3.30|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|8|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-1 / Facilitation
Partner - 1 (Uruzgan, Zabul)|4.30|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|9|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-14 / Facilitation
Partner - 14 (Khost, Nangarhar, Paktya)|7.89|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n\n\nPage 90 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 94
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n|10|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-11 / Facilitation
Partner - 11 (Nuristan, Kunar, Laghman)|4.88|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|11|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-6 / Facilitation
Partner - 6 (Balkh, Jawzjan, Sarepul)|4.47|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|12|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-3 / Facilitation
Partner - 3 (Nimroz, Farah)|3.10|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|13|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-8 / Facilitation
Partner - 8 (Baghlan, Kunduz,
Samangan)|4.88|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|14|CCEP-I/MRRD/CS/FP-2 / Facilitation
Partner - 2 (Kandahar, Helmand)|6.74|FBS|Prior|Oct 1,2016|\n|||||||\n||**Individual Consultant Selection**|||||\n|1|CCEP-I/MRRD/CN/IC-4 / Operations
Advisor (International)|0.54|SSS|Prior|Oct 11, 2016|\n|2|CCEP-I/MRRD/CN/IC-1 / Advisor to
the Minister's Office (International)|0.36|INDV|Prior|Oct 11, 2016|\n|3|CCEP-I/MRRD/CN/IC-5 / Capacity
Development Advisor (International)|0.54|INDV|Prior|Oct 11, 2016|\n|4|CCEP-I/MRRD/CN/IC-3 / Program &
Policy Advisor (International)|0.54|SSS|Prior|Oct 11, 2016|\n|5|CCEP-I/MRRD/CN/IC-2 / Advisor to
the Deputy Minister's Office
(International)|0.36|INDV|Prior|Oct 11, 2016|\n||**Total**|73.96||||\n\n\n**B.** **Independent Directorate of Local Governance (IDLG)**\n**Goods**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Description**|**Estimated**
**Cost**
**(U$S**
**million)**|**Procureme**
**nt**
**Method**|**Domestic**
**Preference**
**(Yes/No)**|**Review**
** by Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|**Expected**
**date for**
**Invitation**
**for bidding**|\n|1|CCEP-IDLG/G-1 / IT
Equipment for four years
and in Five office - four
cities and PIU Unit|0.42|ICB|Yes|Prior|Oct 1, 2016|\n|2|CCEP-IDLG/G-2 /
Furniture for PIU Unit
and Four Cities|0.28|ICB|
Yes|Prior|Oct 9, 2016|\n|3|CCEP-IDLG/G-3 /
Internet Service provision
to PIU Unit and Four
Cities|0.487|
ICB|
Yes|Post|Oct 02, 2016|\n||**TOTAL**|**1.187**|||||\n\n\nPage 91 of 139\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 95
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n**Consulting Services**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|1|2|3|4|5|6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
**Ref.**
**No.**|
**Description of Assignment**|**Estimated**
**cost**
**(in US$**
**Million) **|
**Selection**
**Method**|**Review by**
**Bank**
**(Prior/Post)**|
**RFP**
**Issuance**
**date**|\n|1|CCEP-IDLG/CS-FP-1 / Facilitating
Partner 1 - Herat (Urban)|2.29|FBS|Prior|Oct 07, 2016|\n|2|CCEP-IDLG/CS-FP-2 / Facilitating
Partner 2 - Kandahar (Urban)|1.72|FBS|Prior|Oct 07, 2016|\n|3|CCEP-IDLG/CS-FP-3 / Facilitating
Partner 3 - Mazar (Urban)|1.72|FBS|
Prior|Oct 07, 2016|\n|4|CCEP-IDLG/CS-FP-4 / Facilitating
Partner 4 - Jalalabad (Urban)|1.12|FBS|
Prior|Oct 07, 2016|\n|5|CCEP-IDLG/CS-OC-1 / Oversight
Consultant (OC)|3.87|SSS|Prior|Sep 12, 2016|\n|6|CCEP-IDLG/CS-IC-2 / Operation
Advisor (Expert finance and
procurement )|0.14|
INDV|
Prior|Dec 31,
2018|\n|8|CCEP-IDLG/CS-IC-5 / International
Oversight Advisor to DMM|0.36|INDV|Prior|Jan 01,
2017|\n||**TOTAL**|**11.22**||||\n\n\nPage 92 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 96
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.10: Integrated Fiduciary Assessment (MRRD)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1. Joint Fiduciary Aspects**||||||\n|**1.1 Fiduciary Capacity**
**(PRAMS RF4 & FME 7)26 **|**Joint**|High|
The PMT will develop and publish a
code of ethics to be followed by project
management team (by Dec. 31, 2017).
The PMT will setup the procurement and
contracts management team (PCMT) of
minimum 9 members. Agree on a plan to
acquire the necessary procurement
expertise (e.g. through hiring,
outsourcing, etc.). The team will
comprise of civil servants and contracted
staff (by Oct. 31, 2016).
Annual training calendar for procurement
and contracts management will be
developed. This will enlist the training
programs that are both relevant and
practical. This will be updated in July
every year. All PCMT staff and
procurement decision makers and the
evaluation committee members to attend
the two weeks training in procurement by
(by Jun. 30, 2016).
The core project FM staff will consist of
national contracted staff. Periodic FM|Substantial|
Code of ethics is
published.
PCMT is set-up with
agreed manpower.
Training calendar is
prepared and all the
PCMT members,
procurement decision
makers have received
training.|\n\n\n26 References are to the 11 PRAMS Risk Factors (RF) and the 7 FM Elements (FME).\n\n\n\nPage 93 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 97
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||training will be provided by the Bank on
FM and disbursements aspects.|||\n|1.1.1 Is there adequate
fiduciary staff based on the
profile of the project, in
terms of numbers and
experience, to implement the
project, with clear definition
and segregation of functions
between PR and FM?|Joint|High|
No.
PCMT will be set-up and manpower
deployed as proposed above (by Dec. 31,
2016).
Yes, for FM. 8 focal FM staff for the project
will be from the existing NSP III project.
These staff has significant experience
working on NSP over the last 10 years. The
FM staff in the provinces also has good
experience working on NSP, and they will
continue under CCAP.|Substantial|
PCMT is set-up and
manpower deployed
Continuation of key
FM staff under the
project.
|\n|**1.2 Planning and**
**Budgeting (PRAMS RF5**
**& FME 1)**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.2.1 Are realistic budgets
and procurement plans
prepared and reconciled?||High|
Arrange for appropriate support (staff,
training, tools) to prepare the project
procurement plan such that there is a clear
relation between project objectives and the
procurement plan (Sep. 30, 2016).
Repackage contracts in commercial groups of
goods/works/services to ensure competition
in line with market of procured items (Aug.
31, 2016).
Require periodic reviews to identify/remove
the cause of the variances between planned
and actual and agree on recommendation to
avoid occurrence into the procurement and|Substantial|
50 percent of the
contracts awarded
within the original
plan.
Periodic review of
the procurement plan
in year 1 to suggest
corrective measures
to ensure timely
procurement.
Variances are
reported in the|\n\n\nPage 94 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 98
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||delivery schedule - intensify supervision/
meetings as needed (Jun. 30, 2016).
Annual budgets will be prepared based on
procurement plan and work plan. The
quarterly financial reports will include
comparison of actual expenditures to budgets,
and provide explanation thereof, and should
lead to budget revision as necessary.||financial reports and
explained.
|\n|**1.3 Internal Control**
**(including Internal**
**Audit)(PRAMS RF 1,2**
**&3; FME 3)**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.3.1 Are effective internal
controls in place, as jointly
assessed by financial
management and
procurement staff? These
include internal audit,
clearly defined
accountability, quality
control processes, and
availability of complete
records of the procurement
and financial management
processes.||Substantial|
The delegation of powers to Directors as per
the Afghanistan Procurement Law & Rules
and Procedures needs to be implemented
(Jun. 30, 2017).
Ensure the procurement and contracts
management decision-making is fully
covered in the Operations Manual and is
available and known to staff (Oct 31, 2016).
Agree and include as part of the project
funding to improve safe keeping of records.
Clearly describe in the Operations Manual
what records should be kept in the contract
file and for how long (Dec. 31, 2016)
The FM manual will clearly detail the
arrangements for the project. Payments
follow the centralized arrangements, and
controls in MRRD and MoF over these|Moderate|
Complete manual is
to be ready by Oct
31, 2016.
MRRD includes a
section on safe
keeping of bids and
procurement/
contracts
documentation in the
Operations Manual.
The project audit
ToR is finalized and
includes procurement
audit
The FM manual will
be disseminated to
the FM staff engaged|\n\n\nPage 95 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 99
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||payments are fairly robust. MRRD will be
mandated to submit original copies of
payment documents to MoF, and retain
copies. Internal Audit will be carried out by
the Internal Audit Department of MoF and
MRRD.
||in the project.
Audits and other
reviews do not reveal
major anomalies in
project FM
Internal Audit is
done periodically and
corresponding
reports submitted.
Monthly
reconciliation of the
project DAs is
carried out, and any
unidentified
transactions are
resolved timely.
Adequate controls
exist over petty/
operational cash
management and
custody.
Reconciliation of
expenditures and
fund balances at the
provincial/district
levels and periodic
reporting to MRRD
HQ.|\n\n\n\nPage 96 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 100
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1.4 Contract Management**
**(PRAMS RF10, FME 2 &**
**3)**|**Joint**|High|
Establish contracts management system (by
Sep. 30, 2016).
Review causes for recurrent amendments and
cost overruns. Develop suitable corrections to
planning, estimates, lack of proper designs,
etc. (Jun. 30, 2017).
|Substantial|
Contracts
management section
in the Operations
Manual is ready for
use.
Ensure payments
under contracts are
within the overall
contract value.|\n|**1.5. Project Management**
**and Governance:**|**Joint**|||||\n|**1.5.1 Audit Arrangements:**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.5.1.1 External Audit of
Project Financial Statements
(PRAMS RF 11, FME 6)|**Joint**|Substantial|
Require audit by independent private auditors
Annual project audit will be done by the SAO
with support from an Audit Agent, similar to
the arrangement for other projects. There is
occasional possibility of delays due to delay
in contracting of the Audit Agent and/ or
mobilization of audit team, and sometimes
due to the security situation.|Moderate|
Combined fiduciary,
technical and
contracts
management audit.
Submission of
acceptable audit
report within 6
months from the
government’s fiscal
year end.|\n|1.5.1.2 Technical Audits
(PRAMS RF 11, FME 6)|**Joint**|Substantial|
Include appropriate coverage of procurement
aspects to meet project requirements in the
audit ToR. Need to distinguish between
compliance and performance audits so that
auditors know what to do - provide
appropriate guidance (Jun. 30, 2017).|Moderate|
Combined fiduciary,
technical, and
contracts
management audit.|\n\n\n\nPage 97 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 101
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1.5.2 Mitigating Fraud and**
**Corruption –**
**Transparency,**
**Accountability and**
**Participation (PRAMS RF**
**7 & 11, FME 6)**|**Joint**|High|
In the Operations Manual, establish
arrangements for safe-keeping of
bids/proposals (Sept 30, 2016).
Agree on selection criteria for members of
the evaluation committee, including technical
expertise and review EC formation regularly
in the Operations Manual (Sep. 30, 2016).
|Substantial|
The PMT would
propose and establish
a credible system for
safeguarding the bids
with adequate checks
and balances.
Describe the criteria
and process for
setting up the
evaluation
committee.|\n|**1.5.3 Grievance Redress**
**Mechanisms – complaints**
**handling (PRAMS RF 9)**
**and grievance redress**
**(PRAMS RF 11, FME 6)**|**Joint**|Substantial|
Set deadlines for submission of complaints
and for decision-making by the agency (Jun.
30, 2017).
Establish/improve and implement complaint
management system (Jul. 31, 2017).|Moderate|
PMT will develop a
credible procurement
complaints handling
system and
mechanism and will
adequately display
on the notice boards
and on their website.
The efforts will be
made to develop an
online, SMS linked
complaint handling
system. The PMT
will include the
relevant contacts in
procurement plan.|\n|**2. Procurement Processes**
**and Procedures (PRAMS**
**RF 6,7 &8)**|**PR**|Substantial|
Agree on a list of unacceptable NCB issues
and remove them from documents to be used|Moderate|
Agency to use agreed
documents.|\n\n\n\nPage 98 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 102
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||for Bank financed procurement (Sep. 30,
2016).
Involve technical staff and users in
preparation of specifications or agree to hire
competent consultants to draft TS/TORs
(Dec. 31, 2016).
|||\n|**3. FM Considerations**||||||\n|**3.1 Funds Flow (FME 4)**|**FM**|High|
Annual budget will have to be approved on
time. However historically there has been
delay in approval of annual budgets. There is
provision to make 1/12th of the budget
temporary available at the beginning of the
fiscal year when there is a delay in approval
of the new budget.
Project funds will flow through the
designated accounts. However, there are
some inefficiencies in the processes that
impact timely payments. In the absence of the
float account, the timely payments of grants
to the CDCs have a risk. There are number of
mitigating measures agreed with MoF to
ensure smooth funds flow, such as simplified
documentation for payment requests, bulk
allotments processing, identification and
training of 2 focal staff in SDU on CCAP
documentation, prioritization of CCAP
payment requests, establishment of CCAP
coordination unit in MoF for facilitation,
hiring of one finance staff in the coordination|Substantial|
Availability of 1/12th
of the budget at the
beginning of the
fiscal year.
Bottlenecks are
addressed to MoF in
a timely manner.
Project payments are
made within agreed
service standards by
SDU.
All local currency
payments are made
only from the DA.
Periodic submission
of withdrawal
applications and
sufficient liquidity in
the Das.|\n\n\n\nPage 99 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 103
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||unit to address FM matters, setting up of a
clearance account to route grants to CDCs,
etc.
While direct payment is also an option, local
currency direct payments take longer to
make. Project should aim to make local
currency payments preferably from the DA to
avoid delays.
Robust forecasts should be prepared by
MRRD, and fund requests should be made
periodically.|||\n|**3.2 Accounting and**
**Financial Reporting (FME**
**2 & 5)**|**FM**|High|
All accounting is centrally done in MoF using
AFMIS. At MRRD, accounting systems used
under NSP III will be adopted under CCAP.
Acceptable financial reports should be
submitted on a quarterly basis along with
robust funds flow forecasts. This will be
facilitated by CCAP’s accounting systems.|Substantial|
All accounting is
done in AFMIS, and
MRRD maintains
subsidiary books of
records.
The financial reports
are submitted within
45 days from the end
of the quarter,
showing accurately
project receipts and
payments, and
balances are
reconciled
Timely reporting on
the part of MRRD to
facilitate timely
consolidated
reporting by the|\n\n\n\nPage 100 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 104
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or
Joint|Risk Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk
Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by the
Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||||CCAP coordination
unit.|\n|||||||\n|**FM Risk rating**|**FM**|**High**||**Substantial**||\n|**Procurement Risk rating**|**PR**|**Substantial**||**Moderate**||\n|**Overall Fiduciary Risk**
**Rating**|**Joint**|**High**||**Substantial**||\n\n\n\nPage 101 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 105
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.11: Integrated Fiduciary Assessment (IDLG)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1. Joint Fiduciary Aspects**||||||\n|**1.1 Fiduciary Capacity**
**(PRAMS RF4 & FME 7)27 **|**Joint**|High|
The PMT will establish and publish a code
of ethics to be followed by project
management team (by Jun. 30, 2018).
PMT will develop and implement formal
recruitment system that ensures
competition and a competitive
compensation (Jun. 30, 2017).
The PMT will setup the PCMT of
minimum 5 members. Agree on a plan to
acquire the necessary procurement
expertise (e.g. through hiring, outsourcing
etc.). The team will comprise of civil
servants and contracted staff can be
supplemented by consultants in specific
areas agreed with the Bank (Oct. 31, 2016).
Organize capacity building with emphasis
on understanding and application of
procurement process.
Annual training calendar for procurement
and contracts management will be
developed. This will enlist the training|Substantial| Code of ethics is
published
PCMT is set-up
with agreed
manpower
Training calendar
is prepared, and
all the PCMT
members,
procurement
decision makers
have received
training
|\n\n\n27 References are to the 11 PRAMS Risk Factors (RF) and the 7 FM Elements (FME).\n\n\n\nPage 102 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 106
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||programs that are both relevant and
practical. This will be updated in July every
year. All PCMT staff and procurement
decision makers and the evaluation
committee members to attend the two
weeks training in procurement (Jun. 30,
2018).
IDLG FM staff will be provided training on
a periodic basis on the Bank FM and
disbursement aspects.|||\n|1.1.1 Is there adequate
fiduciary staff based on the
profile of the project, in terms
of numbers and experience, to
implement the project, with
clear definition and segregation
of functions between PR and
FM?|Joint|High|
No.
PCMT will be set-up and manpower
deployed as proposed above (by Dec. 31,
2016).
For FM, focal staff will be identified from
the IDLG Finance Department. While not
having experience on the Bank funded
projects, the staff has worked on donor
funded projects. At the provincial level, 4
finance staff will be hired for each
province, of which 1 will be from the OC.
There is segregation of duties within the
Finance Department.|Substantial| PCMT is set-up
and manpower
deployed.
Continuation of
key FM staff for
the project and
carrying out of
FM functions
efficiently and
effectively.
|\n|**1.2 Planning and Budgeting**
**(PRAMS RF5 & FME 1)**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.2.1 Are realistic budgets and
procurement plans prepared
and reconciled?||High|
Arrange for appropriate support (staff,
training, tools) to prepare the project
procurement plan so that there is a clear|Substantial| 50 percent of the
contracts awarded
within the original
plan.|\n\n\nPage 103 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 107
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||relation between project objectives and the
procurement plan (Jun. 30, 2017).
Repackage contracts in commercial groups
of goods/works/services to ensure
competition in line with market of procured
items (Jun. 30, 2017).
Require periodic reviews to
identify/remove the cause of the variances
between planned and actual and agree on
recommendation to avoid occurrence into
the procurement and delivery schedule -
intensify supervision/ meetings. The first
year has one additional procurement
meeting/mission (Jun. 30, 2017).
Establish a clear relation between the
project needs and the procurement plan
with a credible substantiation of estimated
quantities and timetable and estimates
consistent with market rates (Jun. 30,
2017).
Revise plan based on realistic timing of
contracts and cash flow constraints.
Repackage contracts in an efficient way to
increase competition and reduce costs.
Build Anti-corruption control plan into
project design (Sep. 30, 2016).
Annual budgets will be prepared based on
procurement plan and work plan, broken
down by period and funding source. The
quarterly financial reports will include|| Periodic review of
the procurement
plan in year 1 to
suggest corrective
measures to
ensure timely
procurement
Variances are
reported in the
financial reports
and explained.
Procurement
progresses as
planned and
procurement plan
is updated
annually through
STEP
Variances are
reported in the
financial reports
and explained to
enable
management to
take timely
corrective action.|\n\n\n\nPage 104 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 108
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||comparison of actual expenditures to
budgets and provide explanation thereof,
and should lead to budget revision as
necessary.|||\n|**1.3 Internal Control**
**(including Internal**
**Audit)(PRAMS RF 1,2 &3;**
**FME 3)**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.3.1 Are effective internal
controls in place, as jointly
assessed by financial
management and procurement
staff? These include internal
audit, clearly defined
accountability, quality control
processes, and availability of
complete records of the
procurement and financial
management processes.||High|
The delegation of powers to Directors as
per the Afghanistan Procurement Law and
Rules and Procedures needs to be
implemented (Jun. 30, 2017).
Ensure the procurement and contracts
management decision-making is fully
covered in the Operations Manual and is
available and known to staff (Oct. 31,
2016).
Ensure that a system of accountability for
procurement decision making is
established, and the system covers all steps
of the procurement process and has
timeframes for the decision, including the
time allotted to make them (Jun. 30, 2017).
Require that a record is kept of who makes
decisions, within what time limit and
require justifications when overriding
decision. This is to establish where checks
and balances are needed (Jun. 30, 2018).|Substantial| The complete
manual is ready
by Oct 31, 2016.
The IA includes a
section on safe
keeping of bids
and procurement/
contracts
documentation in
the Operations
Manual.
The project Audit
ToR is finalized
and includes
procurement audit
The FM manual
will be
disseminated to
the FM staff
engaged in the
project.|\n\n\nPage 105 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 109
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||
Procurement and contracts management
system is outdated and based on papers
and logbooks. To bring effectiveness and
efficiency in the system, installing
computerized systems and programs for
handling procurement related issues is
necessary (Dec. 31, 2018).
Include review of time taken to make
decisions and justifications for over-riding
decisions in the TOR of audits (Jun. 30,
2018).
Prepare the Operations Manual as part of
project preparation (Oct. 31, 2016).
Organize mentorship or pupilage programs
to build confidence and skills in application
of manuals (Jun. 30, 2017).
Agree and include as part of the project
funding to improve safe keeping of records.
Clearly describe in the Operations Manual
what records should be kept in the contract
file and for how long (Jun. 30, 2017).
Implement record security and backup
program as early as possible in the project
(Jun. 30, 2016).
Include auditing of filing practices in ToR
for audits (Jun. 30, 2017).
Organize dissemination effort and
improved accessibility to manuals and
instructions (Oct. 31, 2016).|| Audits and other
reviews do not
reveal major
anomalies in
project FM.
Internal Audit is
done periodically
and
corresponding
reports submitted.
Monthly
reconciliation of
the project DAs is
carried out and
any unidentified
transactions are
resolved timely.
Adequate controls
exist over petty/
operational cash
management and
custody.
Reconciliation of
expenditures and
fund balances at
the provincial/
district level and
periodic reporting
to IDLG HQ.|\n\n\n\nPage 106 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 110
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||
The FM manual will clearly detail the
arrangements for the project. Payments
follow the centralized arrangements, and
inbuilt controls in IDLG and MoF are fairly
robust. IDLG will be mandated to submit
original copies of payment documents to
MoF, and retain copies. Internal Audit will
be carried out by the Internal Audit
department of MoF and IDLG.|||\n|**1.4 Contract Management**
**(PRAMS RF10, FME 2 & 3)**|**Joint**|High|
Establish Contracts management system
(by Jun. 30, 2018).
Develop and implement quality assurance
arrangements and inventory controls (Jun.
30, 2017).
Review causes for recurrent amendments
and cost overruns. Develop suitable
corrections to planning, estimates, lack of
proper designs, etc. (Jun. 30, 2017).
Establish system to monitor and expedite
contract modifications or change orders.
Include as part of the ToR for procurement
audits. (Jun. 30, 2017).
|Substantial| Contracts
management
section in the
Operations
Manual is ready
for use.
When needed,
contracts
modification is
done at
appropriate time,
and due controls
are exercised on
contract
modifications.
Ensure payments
under the contract
remain within the
contract value.|\n|**1.5. Project Management and**
**Governance:**|**Joint**|||||\n\n\n\nPage 107 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 111
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**1.5.1 Audit Arrangements:**|**Joint**|||||\n|1.5.1.1 External Audit of
Project Financial Statements
(PRAMS RF 11, FME 6)|**Joint**|Substantial|
Require audit by independent private
auditors
Annual project audit will be done out by
SAO with support from an Audit Agent,
similar to the arrangement for other
projects. There is occasional possibility of
delays due to delay in contracting of the
Audit Agent and/or mobilization of audit
team, and sometimes due to the security
situation.|Moderate| Combined
fiduciary,
technical and
contracts
management
audit.
Submission of
acceptable audit
report within 6
months from the
government’s
fiscal year end.|\n|1.5.1.2 Technical Audits
(PRAMS RF 11, FME 6)|**Joint**|Substantial|
Include appropriate coverage of
procurement aspects to meet project
requirements in the audit ToR. Need to
distinguish between compliance and
performance audits so that auditors know
what to do - provide appropriate guidance. .
(Jun. 30, 2017)|Moderate| Combined
fiduciary,
technical and
contracts
management
audit.|\n|**1.5.2 Mitigating Fraud and**
**Corruption – Transparency,**
**Accountability and**
**Participation (PRAMS RF 7**
**& 11, FME 6)**|**Joint**|High|
In the Operations Manual, establish
arrangements for safe-keeping of
bids/proposals. (Sep. 30, 2016).
Agree on selection criteria for members of
the evaluation committee, including
technical expertise and review EC
formation regularly in the Operations
Manual (Sep. 30, 2016).|Substantial| The PMT would
propose and
establish a
credible system
for safeguarding
the bids with
adequate checks
and balances.|\n\n\nPage 108 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 112
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||
Develop standard template for evaluation
report for project/agency and ensure
compliance (Sep. 30, 2016).
Agency to increase due diligence of
winning bidder prior to awarding. Bank
staff use online Fraud and Corruption Red
Flag Tool and/or discuss with APM/INT
(Sep. 30, 2016).
Agree on appropriate publication (i.e. on a
website or press bulletins) of procurement
decisions and other relevant information as
minimum (Oct. 15, 2016).
|| Describe the
criteria and
process for setting
up the evaluation
committee.
Use of templates
is streamlined
Publication is
done in
accordance with
provisions in the
guideline.|\n|**1.5.3 Grievance Redress**
**Mechanisms – complaints**
**handling (PRAMS RF 9) and**
**grievance redress (PRAMS**
**RF 11, FME 6)**|**Joint**|High|
Set deadlines for submission of complaints
and for decision making by the agency
(Jun. 30, 2017).
Establish/improve and implement
complaint management system (Jun. 30,
2019).|Substantial| PMT will develop
a credible
procurement
complaints
handling system
and mechanism
and adequately
display on the
notice boards and
on their website.
The efforts will be
made to develop
an online, SMS
linked complaint
handling system.|\n\n\nPage 109 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 113
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||||The PMT will
include the
relevant contacts
in procurement
plan.|\n|**2. Procurement Processes**
**and Procedures (PRAMS RF**
**6,7 &8)**|**PR**|High|
Agree on list of unacceptable NCB issues
and remove them from documents to be
used for Bank financed procurement (Oct.
15, 2016).
Prepare acceptable sample bidding
documents for NCB.
Use advance contracting or other facility to
get documents ready by loan signing at the
latest (Oct. 15, 2016).
Involve technical staff and users in
preparation of specifications or agree to
hire competent consultants to draft
TS/TORs (Dec. 31, 2016).
Ensure the technical specialist confirms
that the criteria are pass fail and appropriate
(Dec 31, 2016).
Establish advertising policy and develop
sample advertisement in line with the Bank
Guidelines requirements (Oct. 31, 2016).
Negotiate reasonable and absolute
minimum time for bid preparation and
submission (Oct. 31, 2016).|Substantial| Agency to use
agreed documents
Strong technical
team in place|\n\n\n\nPage 110 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 114
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||
Establish and agree on bid opening
procedure that meets the standards of the
Bank Guidelines (Oct. 31, 2016).
Agree on appropriate dispute resolution
provisions for contracts (at least for Bank
financed ones, note that it is mandatory for
ICB) (Oct.15, 2016).|||\n|**3. FM Considerations**||||||\n|**3.1 Funds Flow (FME 4)**|**FM**|High|
Annual budget will have to be approved on
time. However historically there has been
delay in approval of annual budgets. There
is provision to make 1/12th of the budget
temporary available at the beginning of the
fiscal year when there is a delay in approval
of the new budget.
Project funds will flow through the
designated accounts. However, there is
inefficiency in the processes that impact
timely payments. There are number of
mitigating measures agreed with MoF to
ensure smooth funds flow such as
simplified documentation for payment
requests, bulk allotments processing,
identification and training of 2 focal staff in
SDU on CCAP documentation,
prioritization of CCAP payment requests,
establishment of CCAP coordination unit
in MoF for facilitation, hiring of one
finance staff in the coordination unit to
address FM matters, setting up of a|Substantial| Availability of
1/12th budget at
the beginning of
the fiscal year.
Bottlenecks are
addressed to MoF
in a timely
manner. Project
payments are
made within
agreed service
standards by
SDU.
All local currency
payments are
made only from
the DA.
Periodic
submission of
withdrawal
applications and|\n\n\n\nPage 111 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 115
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||clearance account to route grants to CDCs,
etc.
Robust forecasts should be prepared by
IDLG and fund requests should be made
periodically.
While direct payment is also an option,
local currency direct payments take longer
to make. Project should aim to make local
currency payments preferably from the DA
to avoid delays.
||sufficient liquidity
in the DAs|\n|**3.2 Accounting and**
**Financial Reporting (FME 2**
**& 5)**|**FM**|High|
All accounting is centrally done in MoF
using AFMIS. Accounting systems used
under the ongoing NSP III will be
replicated in IDLG, and IDLG finance staff
will be trained by NSP finance staff on
operations and usage of the systems.
Acceptable financial reports should be
submitted on a quarterly basis along with
robust funds flow forecasts. This will be
facilitated by CCAP’s accounting systems.|Substantial| All accounting is
done in AFMIS,
and IDLG
maintains
subsidiary books
of records.
The financial
reports are
submitted within
45 days from the
end of the quarter,
showing
accurately project
receipts and
payments, and
balances are
reconciled.
Timely reporting
on the part of|\n\n\nPage 112 of 139\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 116
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Fiduciary Element|Responsibility
FM, PR or Joint|Risk
Rating|Comments & Risk Mitigation|Residual
Risk Rating|Key Performance
Indicator
(to be established by
the Fiduciary Team)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||||IDLG to facilitate
timely
consolidated
reporting by the
CCAP
coordination unit.|\n|||||||\n|**FM Risk rating**|**FM**|**High**||**Substantial**||\n|**Procurement Risk rating**|**PR**|**High**||**Substantial**||\n|**Overall Fiduciary Risk**
**Rating**|**Joint**|**High**||**Substantial**||\n\n\nPage 113 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM Risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.9653668403625488,
+ "start": 138,
+ "end": 141
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.5224816799163818,
+ "start": 139,
+ "end": 141
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.857070803642273,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.81038498878479,
+ "start": 167,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6035975217819214,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Overall Fiduciary Risk",
+ "confidence": 0.660634458065033,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 199
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 117
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Environmental and Social (including safeguards)**\n\n\n81. **MRRD and IDLG are responsible for safeguards compliance with CCAP in rural and**\n**urban areas respectively.** Environmental Social Safeguards staff at the MRRD and IDLG\nheadquarters and their responsible staff at the field level will be trained to operationalize the ESMF\npolicies and guidelines. Other line ministries, including MoPH and MoE with their own\nsafeguards units, may be involved in implementing Component 1, Service Standards Grants as the\nproject unfolds. To some extent, there is coordination between the environmental and social\nsafeguards staff of the ministries. However, this coordination and collaboration needs to be\nstrengthened as CCAP moves forward.\n\n82. **MRRD.** At the _national_ level, MRRD will have an Environmental and Social Safeguards\nUnit (ESSU) with two staff, a Senior Environmental Officer and a Senior Social Officer. This unit\nwill be responsible for all ESS issues and for ensuring the ESMF is operationalized at the field\nlevel through ESMPs. In each region, there will be one dedicated Environmental and Social\nSafeguards Officer who will be responsible for training PMU ESS staff, checking sample ESMPs,\nand monitoring ESMP implementation in a sample of subprojects. At the _provincial_ level, one\nsenior engineer from the PMU will be nominated as ESS focal point and assigned all ESS\nresponsibilities. The senior engineer will approve all of the ESMPs and send a sample to the\nESSU. S/he will also use ESMPs to monitor safeguards compliance in subproject implementation.\nThe key decision-making with regard to the ESMP will take place at the provincial level, with any\nqueries affecting decisions that will be referred to the National Unit. At the _district_ level, one\nengineer, supported by two Social Organizers (female and male) from the FP, will be responsible\nfor 20 CDCs. A key role of the two Social Organizers will be to work with the CDCs to ensure\nthat the views and voices of the most vulnerable groups, especially female headed households and\nlandless, are reflected in the selection and implementation of subprojects. The district engineer\nwill be responsible for conducting the transect walk, developing the environmental content of the\nESMP, and consolidating the document by including social content received from the Social\nOrganizers. The district engineer will monitor ESMP implementation during construction.\n\n83. **IDLG.** At the _national_ level, IDLG will have one Environmental and Social Safeguards\nManager. S/he will be responsible for developing the training manuals and training the urban ESS\nstaff. S/he will also receive and review all reports from the urban staff as well as address all queries\nthat are received from the provinces. In the four cities, a Senior Engineer and Environmental and\nSocial Safeguards Focal Point from the FP will be responsible for ESMP implementation. In each\ncity, one engineer, supported by two Social Organizers (female and male) will be responsible for\n10 CDCs in regard to the environmental part of the ESMP. The engineer will develop the\nenvironmental content of the ESMP and consolidate the document by including social content\nreceived form the two Social Organizers. The engineer will monitor ESMP implementation during\nconstruction.\n\n84. **In both MRRD and IDLG subprojects, CDCs, CCDCs, and GAs and communities**\n**will use participatory monitoring techniques to monitor activities during the construction**\n\n\nPage 114 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 118
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**phase and assess impacts during subsequent operation.** The ARTF Third Party Monitor will\nalso monitor safeguards compliance during construction.\n\n**Implementation Informed by Lessons Learned**\n\n85. **CCAP will build upon the community platform established under NSP and seek to**\n**further enhance safeguards compliance by taking account of key lessons learned from**\n**safeguards implementation under NSP**, including:\n\n(a) Public awareness is an effective tool to help guarantee the sustainability of the\noutcome of the subprojects;\n\n(b) Sharing of findings during transect walks with communities for their input and\nfeedback before the finalization of design will ensure better understanding and\ninclusion of community opinions; and\n\n(c) Grievance Redress Mechanisms (GRM) – the number of grievances shows in part\nthe understanding of communities and their expectation with their claims for their\nrights.\n\n86. **Grievance Redress Mechanism.** The GRM will function at three levels: (i) at the\ncommunity level where every effort will be made to resolve the issue; (ii) at the district and\nmunicipal levels where the Grievance Redress Committees will be established; and (iii) at the\nnational level where an appeal mechanism will be built.\n\n**Monitoring and Evaluation for Safeguards**\n\n87. **The CCAP safeguards officers, together with CDCs and GAs, will be responsible for**\n**monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures set out in the ESMP.** Relevant\npractical indicators to enable effective monitoring will be identified by safeguards staff in close\nliaison with community representatives during consultations on possible impacts of subproject\nactivities and the preparation of the ESMP. A third party monitoring agent will produce regular\nreports on selected subprojects and assess safeguards compliance using site specific ESMPs. The\nagency’s reports will be informed by field observation visits and discussions with community\nrepresentatives and various members of the project team. The role of the third party monitoring\nagent is increasingly important as security considerations make it difficult for the World Bank staff\nto visit most subprojects’ sites. Safeguards staff from MRRD, IDLG and relevant line ministries\nwill meet regularly with the third party monitor agent to review their safeguards findings and\nrecommendations. Lastly, as with NSP, there will be technical audits of the CCAP subprojects to\nbe undertaken by an independent firm to review infrastructure quality, safeguards compliance and\ncost effectiveness.\n\n\nPage 115 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 119
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Potential Environment Impacts**\n\n88. **Subproject activities envisaged under CCAP for rural and urban areas are expected**\n**to have no significant and negative environmental and social impacts.** The CCAP\nEnvironmental Category is B, and the relevant World Bank Policies, such as OP/BP 4.01, OP/BP\n4.011 and OP/BP 4.12, are triggered while a number of prevailing laws and regulations are also\napplicable. A framework safeguards approach has been adopted for CCAP while relevant\nsafeguard instruments will also be prepared and adopted during the project implementation stage.\n\n89. **The countrywide proposed upgrading of numerous small infrastructure works will**\n**have minimal impact on the environment and its settings.** An assessment of the negative\nimpacts can be classified into pre-construction, construction and post-construction phases. Some\nof the potential minor environmental impacts are as follows, but not limited to: soil and land\ndegradation; air quality impacts; water log; vehicular traffic implications; disruption of utility\nservices (water pipe, power cable, etc.); noise level increase and ground vibration; and construction\ndebris.\n\n90. **In compliance with the World Bank’s safeguards policies and the Afghanistan**\n**Environmental Law and Evaluating Environmental Impact Regulation, subprojects with**\n**significant adverse impact should go for environmental clearance (EC) by NEPA.** CCAP\nsubprojects are small-scale and community based and expected to have very limited adverse\nimpacts. As a result, it is anticipated that a sample of subprojects per province will be reviewed\nand cleared by NEPA, as was the agreement for NSP.\n\n**Potential Social Impacts**\n\n91. **Subprojects activities under Component 1 of CCAP for rural and urban areas will**\n**not have major adverse social impacts.** Systematic involvement of local people throughout the\nplanning and implementation of subprojects will underpin the identification and implementation\nof any mitigation measures to be included in ESMPs. The project is expected to: (i) build the\nconfidence and strengthen the capacity of local communities to engage in decision-making on a\nbroad range of services, which directly affect people’s lives; (ii) make government more\nresponsive and accountable to its citizens; (iii) enhance the quality of services and the efficiency\nof their delivery; and (iv) ensure that the views and voices of the most vulnerable groups, especially\nfemale headed and landless households, are reflected in the selection and implementation of\nsubprojects under Component 1. Subproject activities are also expected to contribute to improved\nliving standards, including social services, access farm to markets, employment opportunities and\nrising incomes.\n\n92. **Although no resettlement, major land acquisition and/or asset loss is expected, very**\n**small areas of land may be bought outright (willing buyer - willing seller), or acquired**\n**against community compensation**, to facilitate new or rehabilitation of small-scale infrastructure\nwork under Component 1. In regard to the Government land transferred by the authorities to the\nproject, documentation must be free of encroachments, squatters, competing claims or other\n\n\nPage 116 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 120
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nencumbrances. In exceptional cases, minor voluntary land donation may occur in certain areas but\nonly if there are no structures or assets on the land and the impact of the donation on the livelihood\nof the landowner is not significant (less than 10 percent). The voluntary nature of the donation\nwill be fully documented and independently verified. Abbreviated RAPs will be prepared as\nrequired. Guidelines on their preparation are included in the RPF.\n\n\n**Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n93. **The Citizens’ Charter Working Group has formed a Monitoring and Evaluation**\n**(M&E) Sub-committee to review best practices across the ministries** **and coordinate local**\n**level monitoring.** The M&E Sub-committee will design simple community scorecards based\nupon the Citizens’ Charter service standards to monitor service delivery to communities. CDCs\nwith the assistance of Social Organizers and FPs will complete the scorecards every six months.\nThese scorecards will be discussed with local service providers (schools, health clinics, district\nline ministries) and reported back to the district and provincial levels where results will be\ndiscussed at a forum chaired by the Governor. These reports will be sent semi-annually to MoF\nand the Office of the President for review and comments. CCAP will explore with the Afghanistan\nInformation and Communications Technology Sector Development Project the possibility of using\nmobile technology for community scorecard reporting. With 85 percent of the country currently\nhaving mobile access, the Citizens’ Charter can use that available mobile application technology\nto expedite citizens’ reporting and grievance redress. Performance indicators for gender, including\ngender-disaggregated data and citizen engagement, have been incorporated into the project’s\nResults Framework (see Section VII).\n\n94. **CCAP will also take advantage of the third party monitoring arrangements under the**\n**ARTF.** The third party monitors will provide critical data and a level of additional evidence from\nthe field to complement the government monitoring systems and Bank missions. CCAP will make\nuse of their reviews of infrastructure quality as well as their satellite imagery data in order to verify\ninfrastructure assets and gaps based upon the initial needs assessment. The third party monitors\nwill also review the achievement of the service standards, social inclusion dimensions, and CDC\norganizational maturity.\n\n95. **Evaluation and Studies** . The Citizens’ Charter provides a rich environment for testing\nvarious hypotheses important for development effectiveness in Afghanistan as well as other fragile\nand conflict situations. The Government together with the World Bank has discussed eight studies,\nsome to be funded through CCAP and others through additional government resources. Due to\nthe purposive selection methodology by which locations were chosen for CCAP, a randomized\nimpact evaluation may not be possible. However, several evaluations are planned and there is\nroom to potentially undertake some nested experimental studies on citizens’ monitoring and\nreporting.\n\n\nPage 117 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RAPs",
+ "confidence": 0.5493035316467285,
+ "start": 79,
+ "end": 80
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8372692465782166,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community scorecards",
+ "confidence": 0.725639283657074,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 162
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitor service delivery to communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5033097863197327,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 176
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender-disaggregated data",
+ "confidence": 0.9008466005325317,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.6051558256149292,
+ "start": 341,
+ "end": 342
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "citizens",
+ "confidence": 0.8800223469734192,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "satellite imagery data",
+ "confidence": 0.61219722032547,
+ "start": 403,
+ "end": 406
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.5318222641944885,
+ "start": 341,
+ "end": 342
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5561656951904297,
+ "start": 471,
+ "end": 472
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 121
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 2.12: Possible Evaluations for Citizens’ Charter National Program & CCAP**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Evaluation Areas|Funded through|\n|---|---|---|\n|1|**Improved service delivery evaluation**
Has the Citizens’ Charter/CCAP improved services to citizens in the relevant sectors?
Are citizens satisfied with services?
Are women, vulnerable groups and the poorest benefitting equally from the services?
How do CDCs/Clusters interact with ministries?
Document responsiveness of local governments and line agencies to citizens’ voice.
What are the changes in the number of people accessing services?
How has inter-ministerial coordination at various levels improved?|CCAP|\n|2|**CDCs/CCDCs/Gozars Study**
What is the relationship of CDCs to local actors (civil society, communities, shuras, traditional
leaders)?
What is the role of CDCs in ensuring social inclusion of vulnerable groups such as IDPs, refugees,
disabled, ex-combatants? To what extent were CDCs effective as inclusive decision-making
mechanisms?
Have CDCs, Cluster CDCs, and their sub-committees fulfilled their responsibilities to contribute to
improved service delivery at the community level?
Do CDCs and Cluster CDCs have adequate capacities to lead, plan and manage projects and
mobilize communities to address local development issues?
Have CDCs reached a level of maturity to sustain themselves with very limited facilitation?|CCAP|\n|3|**Gender study**
How have women benefitted through the Citizens’ Charter?
What are ways that women can play a greater role in decision-making at the local level?
Are poor women/female heads-of-household benefitting equally.|CCAP|\n|4|**Technical quality of infrastructure**.
Examine technical quality of infrastructure built, safeguards compliance, operations and
maintenance, cost-effectiveness, citizens’ satisfaction with infrastructure, EIRRs|CCAP (or
through ARTF
third party
monitoring)|\n|5|**Service delivery and its relationship to state legitimacy**
What is the relationship between improved service delivery and citizens’ trust and belief in the
state?|CCAP|\n|6|**Conflict and fragility study**
What are the drivers of conflict at the local level and how do they affect public service delivery?
What builds social cohesion at the local level?
How do former combatants view the Citizens’ Charter and what role do they place in CDCs?
What role can CDCs play in addressing conflict in communities?
What linkages can be made with CDCs, districts and provinces to address local conflict?|CCAP or Govt
resources|\n|7|**Local economic development and value chains**
How can the Citizens’ Charter promote local economic growth and value chain linkages? What are
potential markets for growth and jobs creation?
Can we track second-generation effects (e.g. financial literacy, risk-taking, occupational change)?
Can local economic-decision making be improved?
How has production and productivity of wheat and high value crops improved in the Citizens’
Charter areas where MAIL is working?|Govt|\n|8|**Public financial management at the local level**
What are the financial and administrative bottlenecks at the provincial, district, and local levels for
service delivery? How can funds flows be improved?
Are the new public financial management arrangements introduced through the Citizens’ Charter
improving the timeliness of funds flows to communities?|Govt|\n\n\nPage 118 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 122
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Role of Partners (if applicable)**\n\n\n96. The Citizens’ Charter Program will benefit from international partnerships with ARTF\ndonors, the World Bank, and UN agencies, such as UN-Habitat on urban issues, and UNHCR and\nInternational Organization for Migration for refugee and IDP issues.\n\n\nPage 119 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 123
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN**\n\n\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n**Strategy and Approach for Implementation Support**\n\n1. **The implementation support plan of CCAP is developed based upon the experience**\n**over the last 14 years of NSP and the risks and challenges identified in the risk matrix**, in\nparticular those risks related to political, security, and governance context, macroeconomic trends,\nand stakeholder risks.\n\n2. **Intensive implementation support and technical guidance by the World Bank will still**\n**be necessary especially during project start-up.** Task Team Leader(s) (TTL) based in Dubai\nand other technical and fiduciary specialists based in the country office and region will provide\noverall support, with occasional missions from subject specialists from Washington, DC. As\nCCAP is a multi-sectoral, multi-ministerial program, close collaboration will be needed from WB\nsectoral colleagues, especially related to education, health, water, roads, urban, irrigation, energy,\nICT and governance. Supervision missions will have multi-sectoral representation.\n\n3. **Major security threats pose formidable challenges to smooth implementation and the**\n**necessary Bank implementation support of projects of national scope such CCAP.** The\ndeteriorating security situation poses the largest risk to the project and implementation\nsupport. Project implementation will have to remain flexible to respond to possible security shifts.\nModalities that may need to be adopted include relying on communities to broker development\nspace with insurgent groups to allow services to be delivered, or reliance on intermediary agents,\nwhether NGO or private contractors. CCAP and the Bank will also take advantage of the thirdparty independent monitoring arrangements under the ARTF to enhance implementation\nsupport. The third party monitors, typically with better and safer access to communities, will\nprovide critical data and a level of additional evidence from the field to complement the\ngovernment monitoring systems and Bank missions.\n\n\n**Implementation Support Plan and Resource Requirements**\n\n\n4. **The World Bank Task Team will work in partnership with the Government’s**\n**Citizens’ Charter Working Group to solve problems as they arise** . It is expected that the World\nBank’s support will be most needed on a routine basis for operational, procurement and financial\nmanagement issues, coordination across sectors and monitoring and evaluation quality support,\nespecially during the initial two years of start-up.\n\n5. **A Mid-Term Review will be conducted after approximately two years of**\n**implementation,** to identify and recommend any structural changes that may be needed.\n\n\nPage 120 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.687531054019928,
+ "start": 60,
+ "end": 61
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "risk matrix",
+ "confidence": 0.5555734634399414,
+ "start": 86,
+ "end": 88
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5719355940818787,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CCAP",
+ "confidence": 0.504292368888855,
+ "start": 183,
+ "end": 184
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "thirdparty independent monitoring arrangements",
+ "confidence": 0.5081793665885925,
+ "start": 338,
+ "end": 342
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "government monitoring systems",
+ "confidence": 0.914779543876648,
+ "start": 380,
+ "end": 383
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8764265179634094,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 302
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Mid-Term Review",
+ "confidence": 0.9844659566879272,
+ "start": 484,
+ "end": 486
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 124
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n6. **Procurement.** In addition to the prior review, implementation support shall be carried out\nfrom Bank offices regularly. Initially there will be the two regular implementation support\nmissions with the task team. In addition, there will be regular discussions with both MRRD and\nIDLG as the project proceeds and as questions arise. The first year of the capacity building plan\nwill require more intensive support and for IDLG, an additional mission/meeting will be held.\n\n7. **Financial Management.** Strong financial management support will be needed to ensure\nthat there are no problems with funds flow and the new accounts system. The Bank will provide\nthe needed training and hands-on support on a routine basis, especially to the IDLG FM staff who\nhave not previously worked on the World Bank-funded projects. The Bank FM staff will join\nregular supervision missions.\n\n8. **Social Staff.** Formal supervision will include suitably qualified social expertise that will\nconcentrate as needed on issues of local conflict, refugees and IDP integration, and citizens’\nengagement.\n\n9. **Safeguards.** Under NSP, MRRD has built capacity in both environment and social\nsafeguards. Previous audits have not uncovered any safeguard compliance issues. Training will\nneed to be provided to the MRRD and IDLG staff, especially at the provincial and district levels\non safeguards to ensure that environmental and social risks are mitigated. A review of safeguards\nimplementation will be included under each supervision mission.\n\n\nPage 121 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 125
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 3.1: Main Focus in Terms of Support to Implementation**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Time|Focus|Skills Needed|Resource Estimate|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Annually,
Yrs 0-4|
Work-planning,
review progress of
producing the
Operations Manual,
training materials, and
project roll-out.
Review and clearance
of documents
Review FM and
disbursements
Review Procurement
Review E&S risk
management
CC sectors:
Education, health,
agriculture, public
works, urban
M&E Support
|
CDD, operations
Training person
Conflict/IDP
specialist
FM specialist
Procurement
specialist
E&S Safeguards
Education, health,
agriculture, public
works, urban
M&E|**Fees & Travel:**
TTL: 52 staff weeks (SWs)
TTL Operational Support: 18 SWs
Conflict/IDP specialist: 4 SWs
FM Specialist: 10 SW
FM Consultant: 2 SW
Procurement Specialist: 8 SW
E&S Specialists, 6 SW total
Sectoral staff cross-support: 20 SWs
M&E Specialist: 4 SW
|\n|Mid-Term in
2018| Mid-Term Review|Task Team, external
staff and experts| 20 SWs|\n|Completion
in 2021| Implementation
Completion Report|External team with
support from Task
Team| 30 SWs|\n\n\n\nPage 122 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 126
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 3.2: Skills Mix Required**\n\n|Skills Needed|Number of Staff Weeks|Number of Trips
(annually)|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Overall coordination and
task management|52 SWs annually|10 regional|TTL based in Dubai|\n|Conflict/IDP specialist|4 SWs annually|4 international||\n|Technical specialists|2–3 SWs per specialist
annually|3-4 International||\n|FM|6 SWs annually|2-4 Regional|Based in Dubai|\n|Procurement|8 SWs annually|6-8 Regional|Based in Dubai|\n|Safeguards (E&S)|6 SWs annually|4 Domestic|Both environment and
social specialists based
in CO|\n|M&E|4 SWs annually|2 International||\n\n\n\nPage 123 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6469972729682922,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.7927204966545105,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 127
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS**\n\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n\n1. **Economic Rates of Return.** The proposed CCAP builds upon NSP’s accomplishments in\nstrengthening the capacities of CDCs across the country and delivering much needed infrastructure\nservices in rural areas. Since 2003, NSP has funded some 82,000 subprojects to improve access\nto transport, water supply and sanitation, irrigation, electricity and schools in approximately\n35,000 communities in all 34 provinces. Return on investments has been high. In terms of\ninfrastructure rates of return, an external study of NSP III found positive economic rates of return\n(ERR), especially for water, irrigation and power subprojects (the same infrastructure types\nsupported under CCAP). The overall ERR was 41.4 percent for the four main subproject\ninvestments. Under NSP II, the ERR analysis conducted as part of NSP II Implementation\nCompletion Report (ICR) concluded a weighted ERR for sampled subprojects of 69.3 percent\nwhile the financial rate of return was calculated at over 100 percent across a small sample. [28]\n\n2. **Furthermore, an independent impact evaluation of NSP found that the program has**\n**led to a number of important multiplier effects and positive impacts for women**, in terms of\nincreased male acceptance of female participation in public life and broad-based improvements in\nwomen's lives, including increases in participation in local governance, access to counseling, and\nmobility. These and other economic, institutional, and social impacts of NSP further drove\nincreases in girls' school attendance and in women's access to medical services, as well as\nimproved economic perceptions and optimism among women. [29]\n\n3. **Cost Effectiveness Analysis** . Compared to the cost structure of other projects in\nAfghanistan with significant infrastructure investments, NSP’s cost structure is competitive. More\nspecifically, investments in basic services and infrastructure make up on average 69 percent of\ntotal project costs across the projects surveyed in a 2015 Afghanistan study as compared to NSP’s\n73 percent allotment for infrastructure block grants. [30] In terms of unit costs, a 2014 assessment of\nkey NSP sectors by expenditure (roads, power, irrigation and water, and school buildings within\nthe rural development sector) showed that NSP was at the lower end or within benchmark norms\nrelative to other projects. [31] For example, the average cost of NSP’s basic access road investments\nis US$7,471, which rises to around US$13,626 for graveled solutions, whereas benchmark\n\n\n28 World Bank. 2012. National Solidarity Program II - Implementation Completion and Results Report. Washington,\nDC: World Bank.\n29 Beath et al., 2013; Independent Evaluation Group. 2013. _Evaluation of World Bank Programs in Afghanistan, 2002-_\n_11_ . Washington DC: World Bank.\n30 See Bradley et al., 2015. The other projects included National Priority Programs, such as: (a) the Emergency\nIrrigation Rehabilitation Project; (b) its successor the Irrigation Restoration and Development Project; (c) the National\nRural Access Project, and (d) the Strengthening Health Activity for the Rural Poor Project, and (e) the Health Action\nin Transition Project.\n31 Atos Consulting. 2014. _National Solidarity Programme: Phase III Financial and Economic Analysis Final Report_ .\nKabul: Atos Consulting. The benchmarks used for the comparison come from MRRD (NERAP and CARD-F\nprojects), the World Bank’s Rocks Database, the Water Project Organization, Oxfam, and UNICEF.\n\n\nPage 124 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 128
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\ncomparators lie between US$11,000-45,000. [32] The only exception was school buildings.\nComparing cost structures internationally with similar large-scale CDD programs, NSP’s costs\nwere found to be comparable as well. [33] Lastly, based upon the experience of NSP and other\ncommunity programs over the past 14 years in Afghanistan, communities contribute 13 to 30\npercent of total costs in order to access these services.\n\n4. **Building upon the recent NSP cost analyses, the Citizens’ Charter preparation team**\n**reviewed the unit costs and cost structure for the main infrastructure types, comparing those**\n**with other similar programs in the country.** For budgeting purposes, the range of actual\ninvestment costs for water points, roads, irrigation, and renewable energy were reviewed (from\nNSP and other similar programs) and calculated, factoring in a contingency for possible overruns.\nFor the urban component, the budget costs were calculated based upon ongoing experience from\nNSP, UN-Habitat and other urban programs. Component 1, the investment component (inclusive\nof the government’s contribution), represents 67 percent of the total project costs which is\ncomparable to other project ratios in Afghanistan. This is equivalent to approximately US$10 per\ncapita per year over the five-year period, which by international CDD standards is cost-effective\nespecially for a fragile and conflict context. Costs related to institution building (Component 2) –\nrepresenting 21 percent of the overall total budget - such as FP, OC, Social Organizers and\nengineering support were also found to be reasonable and consistent with previous unit costs under\nNSP. CCAP has budgeted for a technical study which will include a cost-benefit and costeffectiveness analysis of its service standards grants.\n\n5. **Fiscal impacts.** The task team has reviewed the Government’s projections for the Citizens’\nCharter over the four-year life of the project as well as the next ten years. The full four-year budget\nof $628 million ($500 million IDA/ARTF and $128 million from government resources) has\nalready been included in the Government’s Medium-term Expenditure Framework. The Mediumterm Expenditure Framework (2016 – 2020) is fiscally sustainable under the assumption that: (i.)\nrevenue increases from 10.2 % to 12.6% of GDP, (ii.) revenue contributions to security\nexpenditures do not increase above plan; and (iii.) on-budget grants increase from 7.1 to 10.3 %\nof GDP. However, should any of the aforementioned assumptions fall short, the Citizen’s Charter\nfunding runs the risk of being reduced. This risk applies to other categories of spending as well\nand is not unique to the Citizen’s Charter.\n\n\n32 Ibid., p.22.\n33 Ibid.\n\n\nPage 125 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 129
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 5: AFGHANISTAN NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PROGRAM: ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED**\n\n\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECT**\n\n**Program Basics**\n\n1. **The Citizens’ Charter is an evolution of NSP design.** As such, it is important to reflect\nupon NSP’s achievements over the past 14 years, lessons learned, and areas requiring\nimprovement. The NSP was established in 2003 by the Government of Afghanistan in order to\ndevelop the ability of Afghan communities to identify, plan, manage, and monitor their own\ndevelopment projects. Communities, supported by FPs, elect their leaders and representatives to\nform voluntary CDCs through a transparent and democratic process. CDCs then implement their\nown infrastructure projects such as building schools, roads, irrigation systems or ensuring access\nto water and sanitation.\n\n2. **More specifically, NSP consists of four core elements:** (i) establishing CDCs in a\ndemocratic manner; (ii) building the capacities of CDC and community members (both men and\nwomen) in local-governance and development; (iii) providing direct block grant transfers to fund\napproved subprojects identified, prioritized and managed by the communities; and (iv) linking\nCDCs to government agencies, NGOs, and donors to improve access to services and resources. [34]\nThe project is implemented by MRRD.\n\n3. **The total NSP budget for the period from May 2003 - February 2016 (not including**\n**community contributions) amounts to US$ 2.5 billion, financed from four sources: IDA, the**\n**ARTF, the Japanese Social Development Fund, and bilateral donors.** The program is broadly\ndivided into three components: (i) community block grants for economic and social development;\n(ii) establishment and capacity building of CDCs; and (iii) project implementation support. [35]\n\n**Major Achievements**\n\n**National Geographic Coverage**\n\n4. **NSP is the only government program to have reached all the country’s 34 provinces,**\n**touching the lives of over 20 million villagers.** By June 2016, the program had reached\napproximately 35,000 rural communities in Afghanistan in three phases:\n\n(i) NSP I (May 2003 - March 2007) covered around 17,223 communities for the first\nround of block grants (BG);\n(ii) NSP II (April 2007 - September 2011) added 5,957 communities for the first round\nof block grants; and\n\n\n34 See the NSP website at _http://nspafghanistan.org/Default.aspx?sel=109_ .\n35 Ibid.\n\n\nPage 126 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.6389621496200562,
+ "start": 65,
+ "end": 66
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9768092036247253,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Afghan communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8691524863243103,
+ "start": 115,
+ "end": 117
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.9588212370872498,
+ "start": 184,
+ "end": 185
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.6881086230278015,
+ "start": 294,
+ "end": 295
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDCs",
+ "confidence": 0.9335141777992249,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.6964004635810852,
+ "start": 399,
+ "end": 400
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.905096173286438,
+ "start": 446,
+ "end": 447
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8033599853515625,
+ "start": 433,
+ "end": 434
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP I",
+ "confidence": 0.9639843106269836,
+ "start": 454,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5975526571273804,
+ "start": 468,
+ "end": 469
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP II",
+ "confidence": 0.7612555027008057,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 485
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP website",
+ "confidence": 0.7294961214065552,
+ "start": 509,
+ "end": 511
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 130
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(iii) NSP III (October 2010 - March 2017) added around 11,850 new communities for\nthe first round of block grants, and extended coverage of just over 11,500\ncommunities for a second round of block grants.\n\n5. **Since 2003, CDCs have become the mechanism to extend the coverage of service**\n**delivery to rural communities**, despite the difficult working conditions generated by conflict and\nfragility.\n\n**Effective Service Delivery**\n\n6. **Under NSP III alone, over 12.5 million people have been provided with access to**\n**improved water sources.** Between NSP I and III, 88,802 improved community water points have\nbeen constructed; 32,000 km of roads have been built or rehabilitated; 39 MW of power have been\ngenerated; over 200,000 hectares of land have been brought under irrigation or provided with\nirrigation and drainage services, and over 5,300 classrooms built. All these subprojects have\ngenerated over 47.8 million days of short-term employment for roughly 2.4 million skilled and\nunskilled workers. [36] More recently, about 600,000 families have benefited from the follow-up\nMCG initiative, which provides short-term job opportunities to maintain or rehabilitate road\ninfrastructure built by NSP. [37] Approximately 50 percent of NSP beneficiaries are women.\n\n\n36 Data taken from 3 sources: (i) NSP MIS System (May 2016); (ii) Afghanistan: Concept Memorandum Regarding\nAdditional Financing (P159307) for the Third National Solidarity Program (Original Project: P117103); and (iii) NSP\nIII Additional Financing Project Appraisal Document (P159307). The number of workers was determined by dividing\nthe total million labor days by the average 20 working days spent per project.\n37 MRRD. 2016. _NSP Newsletter, 2nd edition_ . Kabul: MRRD.\n\n\nPage 127 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 131
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 4.1: NSP Outputs Phase I – III**\n\n|Key Indicator|Output|\n|---|---|\n|# of CDCs elected|34,981|\n|# of subprojects completed|81,609|\n|Labor days for completed subprojects|47,843,064|\n|Kms of road constructed /rehabilitated|32,347|\n|Hectares of land irrigated|233,537|\n|# of school rooms constructed|5,356|\n|MW of power generated|39.05|\n|# of shallow wells and deep wells constructed|88,802|\n|# of male CDC members (1st block grant)|292,751|\n|# of female CDC members (1st block grant)|151,893|\n|# of male CDC members (2nd block grant)|103,265|\n|# of female CDC members (2nd block grant)|84,733|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ NSP MIS System (May-June 2016)\n\n7. **The impact evaluation (IE) conducted in 2013 showed that the project resulted in**\n**tangible, positive impacts in the lives of beneficiaries.** For instance, the NSP-funded water\nprojects specifically increased the usage of protected water sources at both mid-line and end-line\nby an estimated 36 and 5 percentage points, respectively. NSP contributed a five percent reduction\nin the collection of water time. [38] The IE also showed increased access to education (four percent),\nhealth care and counseling services for women, as well as improved school attendance and quality\nof learning for girls. However, the IE revealed that NSP-funded infrastructure projects in irrigation\nand transportation appear to be less successful.\n\n\n38 See Beath et al., 2013.\n\n\nPage 128 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 132
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**Table 4.2: Subprojects, Disbursements, and Beneficiaries by Sector**\n\n|Sector|# of Subprojects|Disbursements
(US$ million)|# of Beneficiaries|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Education**|6,503|59.8|2,838,563|\n|**Irrigation**|17,234|304.8|8,582,866|\n|**Livelihoods**|2,539|9.4|702,263|\n|**Power**|7,988|185|4,249,368|\n|**Transport**|22,557|449|12,746,134|\n|**Water Supply**
**& Sanitation**|19,512|294|8,801,886|\n|**Miscellaneous**|5,276|111|2,981,014|\n|**Grand Total**|**81,609**|**1,413**||\n\n\n\n_Source:_ NSP MIS System, June 2016.\n\n\n**Better Local Governance**\n\n8. **NSP has made significant contributions to state building and local governance.** The\n2013 IE found that NSP strongly increased villagers’ favorable view of government agencies at\nthe midline survey (in May-October 2009), but this effect faded at the time of the endline survey\n(in 2011) when most subprojects were closed and the second round of block grants had not yet\ndisbursed. Another assessment found that 63 percent of people were satisfied with the\nperformance of their CDC and that CDCs were managing NSP funds transparently and were seen\nas being accountable to communities. [39] There is also robust evidence that NSP increased voting\nby men and women in the 2010 parliamentary elections. Several other studies show that NSP has\nbeen able to operate more effectively in insecure areas and is perceived more favorably by\ncommunities and stakeholders than other development programs. [40]\n\n**Boosting Women’s Empowerment**\n\n9. **NSP has expanded the provision of services to women and increased the proportion**\n**of women involved in local assemblies.** According to the IE, this has resulted in greater male\n\n\n39 Asia Foundation. 2013. _Afghanistan in 2013 – A Survey of the Afghan People_ . Kabul: The Asia Foundation; Wang,\nCarol. 2014. “Rule of Law in Afghanistan: Enabling a Constitutional Framework for Local Accountability.” _Harvard_\n_International Law Journal_, 55 (1): 238-239.\n40 Glad, Marit. 2009. _Knowledge on Fire: Attacks on Education in Afghanistan – Risks and Measures for Successful_\n_Mitigation_ . Kabul and Washington, DC: CARE International, the Afghan Ministry of Education, and World Bank.;\nFishstein, Paul and Wilder, Andrew. 2012. Winning Hearts and Minds? Examining the Relationship between Aid and\nSecurity in Afghanistan, 51-52. Medford: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University.\n\n\nPage 129 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7916070222854614,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 12
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.914182186126709,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "midline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7562521696090698,
+ "start": 294,
+ "end": 296
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.536587119102478,
+ "start": 295,
+ "end": 296
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8605016469955444,
+ "start": 250,
+ "end": 251
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "villagers",
+ "confidence": 0.9672315716743469,
+ "start": 285,
+ "end": 286
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "endline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6573784351348877,
+ "start": 311,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.5076830387115479,
+ "start": 295,
+ "end": 296
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.6888811588287354,
+ "start": 250,
+ "end": 251
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2011",
+ "confidence": 0.8269801735877991,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "villagers",
+ "confidence": 0.8038259148597717,
+ "start": 285,
+ "end": 286
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.7931536436080933,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.52630215883255,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.5757975578308105,
+ "start": 499,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2010",
+ "confidence": 0.5822380185127258,
+ "start": 385,
+ "end": 386
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Afghan People_",
+ "confidence": 0.6785909533500671,
+ "start": 486,
+ "end": 488
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 133
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nacceptance of female participation in public life, such as political candidacy by women, women\nworking with the government and/or NGOs, female membership of village councils, and female\ninvolvement in the selection of the village headman. This change in attitudes also affected\noutcomes, with NSP increasing the participation of women in dispute mediation and aid allocation\ndecisions and increasing female inter-village mobility. These and other economic, institutional,\nand social impacts of NSP further drive increases in girls' school attendance, the perception that\nschools are safer for girls, women's access to medical services, as well as improved economic\nperceptions and optimism among women. [41] See separate Annex on Gender Issues.\n\n**Using the Community Platform for Vulnerable Groups such as IDPs/Returning Refugees**\n\n10. **Of growing concern to the humanitarian and development community is the**\n**increasing number of returnee refugees and IDPs.** Forced displacement in Afghanistan is\ncyclical and caused by man-made crises related to violence, conflict and insecurity, and natural\ndisasters. A stunning three-quarters of the Afghan population has been displaced at some point in\ntime during nearly four decades of conflict. As of April 2016, there are some one million internally\ndisplaced persons due to conflict and natural disasters. In addition, the Afghan refugee population\nworldwide was estimated at 2.7 million at the end of 2015 with perhaps an additional 3 million\nundocumented Afghans in the Islamic Republic of Iran and Pakistan, making Afghanistan the\nsecond largest refugee source country. A significant increase in Afghan refugees returning from\nPakistan in 2015 has been attributed to growing push factors in Pakistan. As of April 30, 2016,\nover 64,137 documented refugees and 77,000 undocumented migrants have returned despite\ndeteriorating security conditions in Afghanistan. [42]\n\n11. **Over the years, NSP has served as a response mechanism for returnees** . During the\nearly NSP years when there were large numbers of returnees, the project coordinated closely with\nthe UNHCR and other UN agencies and prioritized for assistance the districts and provinces with\nthe most number of IDPs and returnees. NSP I and NSP II also had specific operational policies to\nassist these groups. For example, IDPs and returnees settling into communities could elect\nrepresentatives to the CDCs so that their voices were heard and needs expressed. A 2012\nindependent report by the University of York evaluating NSP’s impact on IDP, refugee, and\nreturnee reintegration in Afghanistan found that NSP was widely recognized by returnees and IDPs\nand they identified NSP as the provider of community development projects from which they\nbenefited. [43] Additionally, an overwhelming majority of returning refugees and IDPs consider the\ndevelopment projects implemented by the CDCs to be important in their reintegration, and the\nresulting short-term employment from these projects, as having a positive impact on their\nreintegration into the communities. The study also identified areas in which NSP could be more\neffective in relation to serving IDPs and refugees, for example, designing a more targeted approach\n\n\n41 See Beath et al., 2013.\n42 UNHCR. 2016. Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2015. Geneva: UNHCR.\n43 See PRDU, University of York, 2012.\n\n\nPage 130 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.9104223847389221,
+ "start": 66,
+ "end": 67
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "acceptance of female participation in public life",
+ "confidence": 0.6224539279937744,
+ "start": 15,
+ "end": 22
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.8491840958595276,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.8340926170349121,
+ "start": 361,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5087050199508667,
+ "start": 457,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "University of York",
+ "confidence": 0.8744997978210449,
+ "start": 460,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.6790459752082825,
+ "start": 348,
+ "end": 349
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.5228779911994934,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "IDPs and returnees",
+ "confidence": 0.5684455633163452,
+ "start": 410,
+ "end": 413
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.9338708519935608,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.92592453956604,
+ "start": 457,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "University of York",
+ "confidence": 0.5091797709465027,
+ "start": 460,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9762123227119446,
+ "start": 477,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.7858774065971375,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "returning refugees and IDPs",
+ "confidence": 0.6656943559646606,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 517
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 134
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nspecifically for vulnerable groups, training project staff and FPs better on inclusion issues, and\nimproving the M&E system to better track interventions for this group. [44]\n\n**Lessons Learned**\n\n_**(1)**_ _**Partnering with communities and community representative bodies has proven to be an**_\n_**effective way for the Government to deliver services in Afghanistan.**_\n\n12. **The Government cannot do everything. CDCs have shown over the past 14 years of**\n**NSP that if given control over resources, they are capable of planning and managing**\n**development activities.** The CDD approach is also more cost-effective and more sustainable.\nThis is because of communities’ contribution – largely in the form of labor – and the work of the\nCDC members in terms of planning, purchasing inputs, managing the finances and bank accounts,\nand reducing transaction costs that would be incurred if the management of subproject\nimplementation was conducted in a centralized manner. Communities own this work and maintain\nthe infrastructure: the NSP monitoring data indicate that 85 percent of subprojects are functional.\n\n_**(2)**_ _**More is needed to ensure equity and inclusion.**_\n\n13. **The design of NSP placed great emphasis on building social cohesion thorough**\n**collective planning, implementing and building subprojects, and providing labor days during**\n**project construction to each family.** This has helped communities rebuild social relationships\nand regain forms of trust over the past 15 years. The next step for this CDD model is to focus on\nequity and inclusion of the most vulnerable community and CDC members. As local bodies\nresponsible for development, CDCs should create poverty profiles of their communities, which\nwill help them in planning and resource allocation by taking into account the existing cleavages\nalong socio-economic, ethnic, and gender lines. In this regard, work has begun under NSP III\nwhere participatory methods have been rolled out by the FP staff in communities receiving a\nsecond round of block grants. This Participatory Community Empowerment process could be\nimproved by focusing more on quality rather than quantity. Key lessons from this work are:\n\n(a) Infrequent engagement (once per month) of FPs with CDCs and communities does\nnot work well. It is more effective to concentrate the Social Organizers’ (SOs)\nvisits over a period of two weeks, instead of monthly visits of two to three hours.\nIntense engagement (daily visits for 10 days), when people’s work cycle permits,\nis more likely to lead to greater community involvement and collective action. This\nis because immersion in the collective analysis process allows for building\nmomentum, which is crucial for action;\n\n(b) Methods should be limited to a few practical exercises that take the community\nfrom abstract to concrete examples;\n\n\n44 _The Study of NSP’s Impact on IDP/Refugee Returnee Reintegration in Afghanistan,_ Post-war Reconstruction &\nDevelopment Unit (PRDU). University of York, UK. July 2012\n\n\nPage 131 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 135
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(c) Good facilitation techniques and skills among Social Organizers require a capacity\nbuilding process, not a one-time training; and\n\n(d) Social Organizers need techniques to manage and facilitate powerful actors in the\ncommunities, who try to dominate or influence the analytical work with CDCs and\ncommunity members.\n\n14. **At the same time, CDC members and people in general respond well to working**\n**through participatory methodologies:**\n\n(a) The “snapshots” of the community that map well-being analyses and seasonal\ncalendars help CDC members make more informed decisions; and\n\n(b) The emphasis on poor families (that constitute the majority of the population in\nrural villages) illustrates to communities and to the CDC leadership that poverty\nmatters to the Government and that CDCs play a crucial role in reducing it.\n\n15. **A key challenge for CDCs and Cluster CDCs (CCDCs) will be to ensure participatory,**\n**inclusive, transparent and accountable practices.** Some CDC members hold other leadership\nroles ( _maliks_, _arbabs_, _qariadars_, elders, etc.) and operate differently from the ways in which CDCs\nfunction. Their presence in CDCs, based on community elections, is not a problem in itself.\nNevertheless, in some areas and communities, leaders with such status prevent discussions and\ndeliberations and/or dominate the CDC as an institution. Institutionalizing participatory processes\nin CDCs/CCDCs and their sub-committees, with ordinary people being part of the process, is\ntherefore key. Exposure to and the inclusion of a broader spectrum of local society to the\nCDC/CCDC processes is important not only to prevent elite capture, but also because CDC/CCDC\nmembership will change (as elections are held and new people are voted in). What remains\nconstant, however, will be the expectations of the public that CDCs/CCDCs as institutions must\nfollow the principles of participation, inclusion, equity and transparency through social audits and\ncommunity monitoring.\n\n_**(3)**_ _**However, not all problems can be solved at the community level, and there is a need to**_\n_**coordinate more closely with line agencies and district and provincial levels for effective service**_\n_**delivery.**_\n\n16. **Communities can help mobilize labor and report upon service delivery, but line**\n**agencies must be responsible for actions beyond communities’ control.** For example, ensuring\nteacher and health worker quality, providing engineering expertise, ensuring appropriate\noperations and maintenance interventions and coordinating infrastructure linkages with higher\nlevel infrastructure trunk networks (roads, sewerage, etc.) must be led by line ministries. There\nhas to be mutual accountability between citizens, communities, and the government. In the past,\nNSP has not fared so well when it comes to building linkages between key institutions. This is\nbecause NSP was never designed to link to sub-national governance structures (perhaps because\n\n\nPage 132 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 136
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nthey hardly existed as early as 2003), but instead it was vertically organized with lines of reporting\nfrom the field through the PMU channels to the headquarters. Line ministry presence at the district\nlevel is uneven, with some districts having “thin” representation and others more. Those line\nministries that do have staff at the district level have not had a formal mechanism to interact with\nCDCs, and linkages that have occurred have been unsystematic. It will thus be important to enable\nthe interaction between the government and its citizens. Following the principles of subsidiarity,\nthis can be achieved through appropriate platforms that allow for public service providers to\ninterface with CDC and CCDC leadership or its sub-committees to discuss and solve issues that\nprevent or undermine inclusive service provision.\n\n17. **Lastly, NSP was seen as a ministerial (MRRD) program (by donors and by the**\n**Government); hence many other line ministries did not take full opportunity to work with**\n**CDCs** . The Citizens’ Charter, the preparation of which already has created a spirit of collaboration\nand sharing, will change this silo mentality.\n\n_**(4)**_ _**Clustering CDCs create economies of scale and can help to bridge the gap with services,**_\n_**which span across communities. However, women and the vulnerable populations must not be**_\n_**left behind.**_\n\n18. **Clustering has taken place on a formal and an informal basis, reflecting the need to**\n**have higher level decision-making bodies for planning, resources management, and**\n**“multiple communities” project implementation.** The key issues when it comes to clustering\ninclude:\n\n(a) Building a unified CCDC where the members from different communities share a\ncommon identity and vision. This requires a different type of capacity building than\nCDCs that represent a single community. For example, some communities have\nbeen linked to roads, have built schools, and can access to health services, while\nothers do not benefit from these services. Some communities are better off (e.g.\nbetter land for cultivation) and have more development as a result of being able to\nattract resources through connections;\n\n(b) Moreover, there are considerable differences between communities in mountain\nareas and those in plain areas. Mountain communities are more egalitarian,\nwhereas those in plains are more differentiated (e.g. land ownership is more\nconcentrated). Settlement patterns in mountains are less concentrated and there is\ngreater distance between communities (with particular implications for women).\nThese key aspects must feature into the mobilization strategies;\n\n(c) Women’s participation, given their limited mobility. There are numerous factors,\nwhich shape women’s ability to participate in CDCs and CCDCs. These include\nprevailing norms and the extent of their enforcement in terms of women’s visibility\nand involvement in the public sphere. Without women Social Organizer staff’s key\npresence and frequent visits, it will be difficult to make progress on gender issues.\n\n\nPage 133 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 137
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nFemale Social Organizers need to learn about women’s mobility, which may vary\nbetween villages, and to consider how to build on women’s existing freedom to\nmove (selling labor in agriculture, travelling with _moharram_ to visit parents and\nrelatives) as well as how their inclusion in meetings in other villages can be possible\n(with _moharrams_ if needed).\n\n_**(5)**_ _**The quality of implementation will vary depending upon the quality of the facilitation**_\n_**process and several operational actions.**_\n\n19. **The** **quality of implementation, particularly the soft elements (e.g. elections,**\n**participatory processes, and mobilization) has varied considerably** . Some of the international\nNGOs with visions and missions that emphasize development rights and participatory approaches\nhave done better than those that are just focused on fulfilling critical community needs. In the\nfuture, the Citizens’ Charter could ensure that the training program (classroom and field) for FP\nstaff works towards consistent quality emphasis and provides follow-up support. Government\nmonitoring of FP performance will be key in holding FPs accountable in terms of good facilitation.\nIt is crucial that the “right” FPs are hired for this work, and that they in turn hire the “right” Social\nOrganizers.\n\n20. **The number of FPs should be realistic.** The FPs employed by NSP were too many – at\none point up to 32 FPs - and it was difficult to manage their contracts and the quality of their work.\nHowever, MRRD must ensure that the contracts and the terms of reference (time-based, outputbased) are carefully considered in order to be conducive to the desired outcomes. For example,\nthe capacity building mandate of FPs for CDC and Government staff, including the need to work\ntowards hand-over to the government social facilitation in three years, must be a clear mandate for\nthe FPs. The number of FP female Social Organizers in the field working with women in\ncommunities in NSP III has increased significantly as the program introduced specific payments\nlinked to female Social Organizers. The Citizens’ Charter should consider maintaining this\nincentive.\n\n21. **Starting with NSP III, the program was nationalized, with international staff only**\n**holding advisory positions, and the Government civil servant and contracted staff holding**\n**executive functions.** Only financial management services were outsourced, not because of a lack\nof capacity but because Government staff cannot manage the float account. The challenge now\nwill be to build capacity of civil service staff to increasingly take over these responsibilities. This\nis already underway through the CBR Program and change management process.\n\n22. **Lastly, key steps like procurement and planning need to be aligned with the realities**\n**of working in a highly volatile, fragile state environment like Afghanistan.** There needs to be\nflexibility. For instance, if the CCAP IAs are inviting expressions of interest for FPs or key project\nmanagement positions and does not receive sufficient numbers of high quality FPs to apply,\ndeadlines should be extended. In particularly difficult regions, Bank fiduciary rules and oversight\nmechanisms will need to be adjusted through a proper adaptation that allows the World Bank and\n\n\nPage 134 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 138
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nthe Government to manage risk while still delivering benefits in high risk, fragile state\nenvironments.\n\n\nPage 135 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 139
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: GENDER PLAN FOR CITIZENS’ CHARTER AFGHANISTAN PROJECTS**\n\n\n**COUNTRY : Afghanistan**\n**Citizens' Charter Afghanistan Project**\n\n\n**Country Context**\n\n1. **For inclusive development to occur in Afghanistan, the role of women in political,**\n**economic and social spheres must be strengthened.** The challenges are enormous. According\nto the 2014 United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report, Afghanistan\nranks the 150th out of 151 countries, in terms of the Gender Inequality Index. Despite notable,\nconsistent improvements in recent years for education and health, these indicators are still low by\ninternational standards. Only 19 percent of women aged 15 years and older can read and write, as\ncompared to 49 percent amongst men. Twenty-three percent of pregnant women attend the\nrecommended four ante-natal visits, and the percentage of births attended by skilled health\npersonnel is only 37 percent in rural areas. Employment figures are especially skewed. While men\nhave a labor force participation rate of 81 percent, women score much lower with only 29 percent.\nUnemployment is more than twice as high among women than among men (37 percent against 18\npercent). [45]\n\n2. **Social and cultural norms make it especially challenging for women to reach their full**\n**potential** . Only 57 percent of Afghan men believe that women should be allowed to work outside\nof the home, and even this level of endorsement comes with caveats as to the types and places of\nwork that are considered acceptable for women. [46] The 2013/2014 Afghanistan Living Conditions\nSurvey found that three-quarters of women do not leave the dwelling without the company of\nanother person and about half leave the house four times or less per month, while 12 percent of\nwomen indicate they never left the house in an entire month. Furthermore, female decision-making\non spending money is quite restricted. [47]\n\n3. **Over the past decade, the government has developed several strategies to improve**\n**opportunities for women.** These include the National Action Plan for the Women of Afghanistan\n(2008-2018), the Elimination of Violence against Women law (2009), and a Gender\nMainstreaming Guideline for Municipalities (2014). The Government is currently preparing a\nNational Women’s Economic Empowerment Program designed to create conditions that will\nenable women to become full participants in every level of the economy.\n\n**Experience under NSP and Urban Areas and Lessons Learned**\n\n4. **Over the years, NSP has put in place several procedures to increase women’s**\n**participation in the program.** For example, gender awareness training was required for the FP\n\n\n45 See CSO, 2016.\n46 See The Asia Foundation, 2013.\n47 See CSO, 2016.\n\n\nPage 136 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Human Development Report",
+ "confidence": 0.7969434857368469,
+ "start": 98,
+ "end": 101
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "United Nations Development Programme",
+ "confidence": 0.8821107149124146,
+ "start": 94,
+ "end": 98
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9799118638038635,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.9874413013458252,
+ "start": 93,
+ "end": 94
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "women aged 15 years and older",
+ "confidence": 0.7146348357200623,
+ "start": 145,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Employment figures",
+ "confidence": 0.8500996232032776,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 196
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9499008655548096,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 321
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013/2014",
+ "confidence": 0.8932985067367554,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Afghan men",
+ "confidence": 0.7102925777435303,
+ "start": 274,
+ "end": 276
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan Living Conditions\nSurvey",
+ "confidence": 0.8295297622680664,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Survey",
+ "confidence": 0.531499981880188,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.9362295866012573,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 321
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013/2014",
+ "confidence": 0.9563236236572266,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Afghan men",
+ "confidence": 0.749111533164978,
+ "start": 274,
+ "end": 276
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.8480421900749207,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CSO",
+ "confidence": 0.5305778980255127,
+ "start": 536,
+ "end": 537
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Urban Areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5919575691223145,
+ "start": 485,
+ "end": 487
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.7615890502929688,
+ "start": 538,
+ "end": 539
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 140
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nand NSP staff. Equal numbers of men and women are elected to CDCs where feasible, either to\nform a mixed CDC or separate ones with two sub-committees and a joint executive committee. At\nthe executive committee level, to ensure women’s participation at the higher level and engage\nthem in leadership and financial management, NSP introduced a quota system for women’s equal\nrepresentation; out of four executive committee members two of them are women. Considering\nthe important role female social organizers play, NSP made it mandatory for FPs to have female\nsocial mobilizers as part of their staff. NSP’s monitoring reports and impact evaluation show\nimpressive results due to these measures. The studies reveal that women can be involved in\ndecision-making, and their participation in local governance has broader impacts with regard to\ngirls’ school attendance, women’s access to medical services and improved economic perceptions\nand optimism among women.\n\n5. **According to monitoring reports, CDCs provide a space for women to gather**\n**together, form bonds with fellow women, share problems that they are confronted with and**\n**identify possible solutions to said problems** . Women experienced being “seen and heard” by\nfamily members or community members due to the skills and/or knowledge they gained from the\nNSP CDC training. As CDC office bearers and sub-committee members, women gained greater\nknowledge of village leadership, development governance, and service provision. Women CDC\nmembers have reported greater standing and respect in the community (amongst women and men).\nThis work has provided an important foundation from which to improve women’s role in all walks\nof life in the society for the future. NSP’s requirement to form women’s CDCs has sent a strong\nsignal to men that women have a role in development.\n\n6. **In urban areas, several “success stories” illustrate what is possible with a mixture of**\n**good capacity building, collaboration with local government, and resources placed in the**\n**hands of women.** Under the Community- Based Municipality Support Project, in Kabul, a\nWomen’s Park was constructed, through negotiations with the Greenery Department of Kabul\nMunicipality. Female CDC members found it to be an ideal experience to negotiate for the benefit\nof the park for their community. The ongoing Afghanistan Urban Peace Program promotes the\nleadership and active involvement of women. It has set an example by recruiting 54 percent female\nstaff and placing mixed-gender field teams in every city. It is collaborating with municipal gender\nadvisors in all its activities, which has, in turn, raised their profile within municipalities. In every\nprovince, including conservative areas like Farah, the program has some mixed-gender groups and\nwomen are leading all levels of administrative and program work. A third example is the\nCommunity Led Urban Infrastructure Project in which specific grants were allocated at the GA\nlevel to specifically address the needs of women and empower women socially and economically.\nThe project encouraged women to hold leadership roles in the proposed businesses. It also gives\nthem access to project resources, roles in decision-making and access to information and training.\n\n7. **However, despite these accomplishments, there are significant challenges.** A gender\nreview of NSP concluded that despite positive outcomes for women, not surprisingly barriers still\nexist, including: (i) social and cultural limitations posed whereby women have traditionally\nassumed a subordinate role; (ii) lack of education and illiteracy; and (iii) lack of knowledge and\nexperience in public affairs which serves to inhibit their participation in the CDC meetings and\n\n\nPage 137 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 141
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\nsubprojects. [48] Women’s participation also varies according to ethnicity, class, age, status, and\nregionally.\n\n**Lessons Learned and Recommendations for CCAP**\n\n8. Based upon lessons learned over the past 14 years of NSP and several urban project\nexperiences, CCAP will undertake the following new measures.\n\n**For MRRD/IDLG staff:**\n\n(a) During the recruitment process, the Government will undertake affirmative action\nefforts (i.e. hire a female applicant if she has the same qualifications as a male\napplicant). MRRD and IDLG will increase the number of female staff. IDLG\ncurrently has a total of 495 staff, of which 52 or 11 percent are women, in Kabul.\nMRRD currently has 347 or 9 percent of female civil servant and contracted staff\nin Kabul and provincial offices.\n\n(b) To ensure a safe workplace environment, the Government will enforce the antiharassment act recently approved by the government of Afghanistan. CCAP will\nalso require FPs to abide by and enforce this policy.\n\n**For communities in both rural and urban areas:**\n\n(c) **Community analysis** : Under the Citizens’ Charter, more specific mapping of\nwomen’s mobility, socio-economic status of women (e.g. identifying female\nheaded households) will be conducted and the data and findings will be included in\nthe Community Development Plan. The health and education sub-committees of\nCDCs will be actively overseeing women and girls’ education and health related\nissues in the community. These sub-committees will mobilize communities\nespecially on issues related to girls’ education and literacy, proper maternal and\ninfant care, and nutrition.\n\n(d) **Capacity building:** The CDCs and their sub-committees will be further trained on\ngender equity and identifying women’s specific needs.\n\n(e) **Exchange visits:** A new initiative under the Citizens’ Charter will be organizing\nand facilitating exchange visits for female CDC and subcommittee members to visit\n“champion CDCs” which encourage active women’s participation.\n\n\n48 See Case Study Series of the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). AREU. 2010. _Does Women’s_\n_Participation in the National Solidarity Program Make a Difference in their Lives? A Case Study in Balkh Province_ .\nKabul: AREU.; AREU. 2010. _Does Women’s Participation in the National Solidarity Program Make a Difference in_\n_their Lives? A Case Study in Parwan Province_ . Kabul: AREU.; AREU. 2012. _Does Women’s Participation in the_\n_National Solidarity Program Make a Difference in their Lives? A Case Study in Kabul Province_ . Kabul: AREU.\n\n\nPage 138 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "NSP",
+ "confidence": 0.9490365386009216,
+ "start": 61,
+ "end": 62
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5509982109069824,
+ "start": 197,
+ "end": 198
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "14 years",
+ "confidence": 0.6823591589927673,
+ "start": 58,
+ "end": 60
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MRRD",
+ "confidence": 0.5768709778785706,
+ "start": 79,
+ "end": 80
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5470811724662781,
+ "start": 10,
+ "end": 11
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "female civil servant and contracted staff",
+ "confidence": 0.5091056823730469,
+ "start": 162,
+ "end": 168
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Case Study Series",
+ "confidence": 0.819579541683197,
+ "start": 407,
+ "end": 410
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Afghanistan",
+ "confidence": 0.5459762811660767,
+ "start": 412,
+ "end": 413
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2010",
+ "confidence": 0.8334144949913025,
+ "start": 423,
+ "end": 424
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National Solidarity Program",
+ "confidence": 0.938849687576294,
+ "start": 465,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "Case Study",
+ "confidence": 0.8889528512954712,
+ "start": 476,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "AREU.",
+ "confidence": 0.822195291519165,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.7616482377052307,
+ "start": 489,
+ "end": 490
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 142
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nCitizens' Charter Afghanistan Project (P160567)\n\n\n(f) **Increasing women’s voice in decision-making:** During the planning process for\nCDPs, there will be, if needed, separate focus group meetings with men and women\nto discuss their priorities and needs in the presence of Social Organizers. The\noutcome of this meeting will be captured in the plans, which will contain a section\ncapturing women’s priorities and recommendations.\n\n(g) **Strong collaboration with the Women’s Economic Empowerment NPP** . The\nCitizens’ Charter will work closely with the Government’s upcoming NPP for\nWomen’s Economic Empowerment. CDCs will help mobilize and support female\nliteracy training, women-only business skills training centers and partner with\nexisting, community-based women’s lending and business groups to provide\nbusiness and financial skills training.\n\n\nPage 139 of 139\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/257391477792873512/pdf/PAD-Citizens-Charter-Afghanistan-P160567-Oct-7-Board-version-10072016.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 143
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file