diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_103/raw/doc_103_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_103/raw/doc_103_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_103/raw/doc_103_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,7273 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "Document of\n# **The World Bank**\n\n**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY**\nReport No: PAD2163\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\n\nON A\n\n\nPROPOSED CREDIT\n\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 73.90 MILLION\n(US$100 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nTO THE\n\n\nREPUBLIC OF KENYA\n\n\nAND A\n\n\nPROPOSED GRANT\n\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 2.30 MILLION\n(US$3 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nTO THE\n\n\nINTERGOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ON DEVELOPMENT\n\n\nFOR A\n\n\nDEVELOPMENT RESPONSE TO DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS PROJECT (DRDIP) IN THE\nHORN OF AFRICA\n\n\nApril 5, 2017\n\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural, and Resilience Global Practice\nAfrica Region\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their\nofficial duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n(Exchange Rate Effective February 28, 2017)\n\n\nCurrency Unit = Kenyan Shillings (KES)\n\n\nKES 103.80 = US$1\n\n\nUS$1 = SDR 0.73861244\n\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJuly 1–June 30 : Kenya\nJanuary 1 – December 31: IGAD\n\nABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS\nAFR Africa Region\nASAL Arid and Semi‐Arid Land\nCBO Community‐based Organization\nCDD Community Driven Development\nCDP Community Development Plan\nCG Community Group\nCIDA Canadian International Development Agency\nCIDP County Integrated Development Plan\nCIG Common Interest Group\nCIPIU County Integrated Project Implementation Unit\nCPS Country Partnership Strategy\nCRA Commission on Revenue Allocation\nCSC County‐Level Steering Committee\nCSO Civil Society Organization\nCTC County Technical Committee\nDRDIP Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project\nESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework\nFCDC Frontier Counties Development Council\nFDMM Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration\nFFA Food for Asset\nFM Financial Management\nGBV Gender‐Based Violence\nGoK Government of Kenya\nGRS Grievance Redress Mechanism\nHIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome\nHOA Horn of Africa\nICGLR International Conference on the Great Lakes Region\nIDA International Development Association\nIDP Internally Displaced Person\nIFR Interim Financial Report\nIGAD Intergovernmental Authority on Development\nIPF Investment Project Financing\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "IRR Internal Rate of Return\nISN Interim Strategy Note\nLIPW Labor‐Intensive Public Work\nM&E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMDTF Multi‐Donor Trust Fund\nMIS Management Information System\nNDP National Development Plan\nNEDI North and Northeastern Development Initiative\nNGO Nongovernmental Organization\nNPIU National Project Implementation Unit\nNPSC National Project Steering Committee\nNPV Net Present Value\nNSNP National Safety Net Program\nNT National Treasury\nPDO Project Development Objective\nPIM Project Implementation Manual\nPIU Project Implementing Unit\nPRSC Project Regional Steering Committee\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\nRPSC Regional Project Steering Committee\nSA Social Assessment\nSAC Social Audit Committee\nSC Steering Committee\nSoP Series of Projects\nSTEP Systematic Tracking of Exchanges in Procurement\nTC Technical Committee\nUN United Nations\nUNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees\nUNICEF United Nations Children's Fund\nVLC Village‐level Committee\nVSLA Village Savings and Lending Association\nWLC Ward Level Committees\nWFP World Food Program\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Makhtar Diop\n\nCountry Director: Diarietou Gaye\nSenior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz‐Vasquez\n\nPractice Manager: Robin Mearns\nTask Team Leader(s): Varalakshmi Vemuru; G N V Ramana\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Is this a regionally tagged project?|Country(ies)|Lending Instrument|\n|---|---|---|\n|Yes
|Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda|Investment Project Financing|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Approval Date|Closing Date|Environmental Assessment Category|\n|---|---|---|\n|26‐Apr‐2017||B ‐ Partial Assessment
|\n|Bank/IFC Collaboration|
|
|\n|No|||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 1 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|[ ]
Counterpart
Funding|[ ] IBRD|✔
[ ] IDA Credit
[ ] Crisis Response
Window
✔
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|✔
[ ] IDA Grant
[ ] Crisis Response
Window
✔
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|Col5|[ ] Trust
Funds|[ ]
Parallel
Financing|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Total Project Cost:
103.00
|Total Project Cost:
103.00
|Total Financing:
103.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IBRD/IDA):
103.00|Total Financing:
103.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IBRD/IDA):
103.00|Financing Gap:
0.00
|Financing Gap:
0.00
|Financing Gap:
0.00
|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 2 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 3 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 4 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 5 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\nPage 6 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 7 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\nKENYA\nDEVELOPMENT RESPONSE TO DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS PROJECT (DRDIP) IN THE HORN OF AFRICA\n\n\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................................... 10**\n\n\nA. Country Context ................................................................................................................ 13\n\n\nB. Sectoral and Institutional Context .................................................................................... 15\n\n\nC. Higher‐Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes ............................................... 16\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 18**\n\n\nA. PDO .................................................................................................................................... 18\n\n\nB. Project Beneficiaries .......................................................................................................... 18\n\n\nC. PDO‐Level Results Indicators ............................................................................................. 20\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 20**\n\n\nA. Project Components .......................................................................................................... 20\n\n\nB. Project Cost and Financing ................................................................................................ 27\n\n\nC. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design ...................................................... 30\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................................................... 33**\n\n\nA. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ............................................................. 33\n\n\nB. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................... 35\n\n\nC. Sustainability ..................................................................................................................... 36\n\n\nD. Role of Partners ................................................................................................................. 36\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS ....................................................................................................................... 37**\n\n\nA. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks .............................................................. 37\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 39**\n\n\nA. Economic and Financial (if applicable) Analysis ................................................................ 39\n\n\nB. Technical ............................................................................................................................ 40\n\n\nC. Financial Management ...................................................................................................... 41\n\n\nD. Procurement ..................................................................................................................... 43\n\n\nE. Social (including Safeguards) ............................................................................................. 43\n\n\nF. Environment (including Safeguards) ................................................................................. 44\n\n\nH. World Bank Grievance Redress ......................................................................................... 46\n\n\nPage 8 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ..................................................................... 47**\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: FORCED DISPLACEMENT CONTEXT IN KENYA ......................................................... 56**\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 60**\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ..................................................................... 78**\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN ........................................................................ 98**\n\n\n**ANNEX 5: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ................................................................. 101**\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: SUPPORT TO IGAD FOR EXPANSION OF THE REGIONAL SECRETARIAT ON FORCED**\n**DISPLACEMENT AND MIXED MIGRATION ............................................................................ 111**\n\n\n**ANNEX 7: LABOR INTENSIVE PUBLIC WORKS ....................................................................... 115**\n\n\n**ANNEX 8: MAP .................................................................................................................... 120**\n\n\nPage 9 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n\n1. Global forced displacement is arguably the defining humanitarian as well as a developmental\nchallenge of this generation. Extreme poverty is now increasingly concentrated among vulnerable groups,\nincluding people who had to flee in the face of conflict and violence, and their protracted presence affects\ndevelopment prospects in the communities that are hosting them notwithstanding some short‐term\neconomic gains. Over 65 million people are now forcibly displaced because of wars, conflict, and\npersecution. This includes about 24 million refugees and asylum seekers and about 41 million internally\ndisplaced persons (IDPs). According to the World Bank Group’s November 2015 report 0F [1], forced\ndisplacement remains largely concentrated in low‐ and middle‐income countries, particularly in Africa,\nand the Middle East which accounted for almost 60 percent of all forcibly displaced persons followed by\nSouth Asia, which is also hosting significant numbers.\n\n\n2. Sub‐Saharan Africa hosts more than 26 percent of the world’s refugee population and nearly 12\nmillion IDPs by December 2016, mainly due to the ongoing conflicts in South Sudan, the Central African\nRepublic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Northern Nigeria. The number of refugees\nfrom South Sudan breached 1 million following the July 2016 conflict. The Horn of Africa (HOA), a region\nwith an estimated 242 million inhabitants, includes eight countries: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya,\nSomalia, South Sudan, Sudan, and Uganda, which collectively host more than 6.5 million IDPs and\napproximately 3.5 million refugees. Displacement has been protracted in the HOA, with refugee arrivals\nrecorded as early as in 1959 in Uganda and in 1991 in Kenya. Migration within and outside the HOA is\ndriven by natural events and human actions; with climate change and environmental degradation acting\nas threat multipliers, compounding displacement.\n\n\n3. The Regional Initiative in Support of the HOA, launched by the World Bank on October 23, 2014 1F [2]\nby World Bank President Jim Kim and United Nations (UN) Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, is built on two\ninterrelated pillars: (a) vulnerability and resilience; and (b) economic opportunity and integration to\naddress key drivers of instability and promote development in the HOA. Displacement has emerged as a\nregional phenomenon with spillover effects in countries neighboring those experiencing conflict and\nposing major challenges for reducing poverty and achieving sustainable development with peace and\nsecurity in the region. Despite its rich endowment in human, social, and natural capital, the HOA is plagued\nby a complex history of marginalization, implementation capacity constraints, pockets of poverty and\ninsecurity, increasing environmental degradation, and a range of other persistent development\nchallenges. Conflict remains endemic, and the complex cultural, social, and political nature of the conflicts\nis further compounded by demographic shifts because of population growth and movement of people;\nimbalanced service provision; increasing competition for scarce natural resources; and harsh climatic\nconditions including frequent droughts and floods.\n\n\n4. Complementary to the HOA Initiative, a regional study on ‘Forced Displacement and Mixed\nMigration in the Horn of Africa’ was completed in June 2015. A regional operation on Development\n\n\n1 World Bank Group. 2015. “A Response to Global Forced Displacement.” Staff Working Paper, World Bank Group, Washington,\nDC.\n2 “Leaders Commit Billions in Major New Development Initiative for the Horn of Africa.” Press Release (October 27), World\nBank, Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press‐release/2014/10/27/leaders‐commit‐billions‐major‐new‐\ndevelopment‐initiative‐horn‐africa.\n\n\nPage 10 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8090911507606506,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.8165357112884521,
+ "start": 149,
+ "end": 150
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5587529540061951,
+ "start": 142,
+ "end": 144
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6425126791000366,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.9665811657905579,
+ "start": 148,
+ "end": 149
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "internally\ndisplaced persons",
+ "confidence": 0.6928957104682922,
+ "start": 132,
+ "end": 135
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Regional Initiative",
+ "confidence": 0.5225874185562134,
+ "start": 385,
+ "end": 387
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.5897738933563232,
+ "start": 334,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.6645497679710388,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 403
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "1991",
+ "confidence": 0.5866049528121948,
+ "start": 349,
+ "end": 350
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nResponse to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P152822) supporting three\nrefugee‐hosting countries of Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Uganda; and a regional grant to the\nIntergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) was approved on May 31, 2016. DRDIP addresses\nthe regional spillover effect of conflict and forced displacement, through a development response that\nseeks to support the host communities in overcoming the shocks and impacts of refugees thus creating a\nrefugee space contributing to a regional “public good”.\n\n\n5. The proposed operation is being prepared as part of the second phase of DRDIP, which was\ndesigned as a series of projects (SoP). The SoP allows for other countries in the HOA to opt into the\nprogram at a later date, according to their needs and specific requirements. It is in this context that Kenya\nwhich has been hosting refugees in a protracted situation, is joining the project through International\nDevelopment Association (IDA) financing as Phase II of the SoP. Other potential countries include South\nSudan and potentially Somalia, Sudan, and Eritrea if they become eligible for IDA or through trust funds. 2F [3]\nThe SoP could also allow for Additional Financing for Djibouti, Uganda, Ethiopia and Kenya under the\nIDA18 refugee sub‐window 3F [4] for intensification and expansion of interventions.\n\n\n6. The rationale for developing DRDIP II with Kenya is (a) the regional spillover effects of the forced\ndisplacement situation in the HOA that directly affects Kenya and the ongoing regional dialogues that are\ntaking place; 4F [5] (b) the lessons learned during the preparation and early implementation of the DRDIP I\nwhich validates the proposed interventions using the Community Driven Development (CDD) approach\nand local‐government‐led implementation; and (c) the establishment of the Regional Secretariat for\nForced Displacement and Mixed Migration (FDMM) in the IGAD that has created a regional platform for\ngovernments in the HOA to share experiences and knowledge as well as contribute to policy\nharmonization and institutional building for development response to forced displacement among all\nmember countries irrespective of whether they are part of the regional operation.\n\n\n7. The DRDIP II will be an integral part of the broader ‘North and Northeastern Development\nInitiative’ (NEDI) for Kenya, specifically focusing on an area‐based and progressive‐solutions approach to\naddress the impacts of protracted presence of the refugees on the host communities around the Dadaab\nand Kakuma refugee camps in Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana Counties of Kenya. The protracted presence of\nrefugees has resulted in a complex relationship of interdependence between the refugees and the host\ncommunities. While there have been positive impacts on improved access to basic services and economic\ninteractions including employment opportunities for the host communities, this has had significant\nnegative impacts on environment and natural resources including water availability and conflicts over\ngrazing lands and water for the livestock.\n\n\n8. The Government of Kenya (GOK) took a decision to close the Dadaab refugee camp complex in a\nphased manner according to operational modalities and support measures articulated by the Tripartite\nAgreement between the Governments of Kenya and Somalia and the United Nations High Commissioner\nfor Refugees (UNHCR) in 2013 for the voluntary repatriation of Somali refugees from Kenya to Somalia\n\n3Somalia, Sudan, and Eritrea can participate under the program. But given their current nonaccrual status with IDA, they are\nnot able to receive IDA financing to participate in the project, before a resolution of their arrears situation with IDA and other\nofficial creditors. Therefore, for these countries, trust funds through an MDTF would be needed.\n4 Once they satisfy the criteria for accessing the IDA 18 refugee sub‐window\n5 Kenya is organizing a Head of State summit on the situation of forced displacement in the HOA with a specific focus on\nSomalia scheduled for March 30–31, 2017.\n\n\nPage 11 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6738788485527039,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8652672171592712,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.6076886057853699,
+ "start": 73,
+ "end": 74
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.7668878436088562,
+ "start": 105,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5368350148200989,
+ "start": 75,
+ "end": 76
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6832060217857361,
+ "start": 105,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SoP",
+ "confidence": 0.5219563841819763,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.5864760875701904,
+ "start": 157,
+ "end": 158
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8199074268341064,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 188
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.52824866771698,
+ "start": 281,
+ "end": 283
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.6051334738731384,
+ "start": 157,
+ "end": 158
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5351521968841553,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 188
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP I",
+ "confidence": 0.8196886777877808,
+ "start": 333,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6102834939956665,
+ "start": 473,
+ "end": 474
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "North and Northeastern Development\nInitiative",
+ "confidence": 0.5251724123954773,
+ "start": 440,
+ "end": 445
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6383086442947388,
+ "start": 473,
+ "end": 474
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tripartite\nAgreement",
+ "confidence": 0.7079896926879883,
+ "start": 598,
+ "end": 600
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2013",
+ "confidence": 0.5475097894668579,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.9019355177879333,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA",
+ "confidence": 0.8001794815063477,
+ "start": 650,
+ "end": 651
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7500677704811096,
+ "start": 741,
+ "end": 742
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6446281671524048,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nensuring safe, dignified, and voluntary return. While the Tripartite Agreement expired in November 2016\nand was not formally extended, a _note verbale_ was issued along with the extension of the Dabaab closure\nto May 31, 2017. However, the Governments of Kenya and Somalia, and UNCHR remain committed to the\nTripartite Agreement and ensuring safe and dignified return of those refugees from Dadaab who wish to\nvoluntarily relocate to Somalia while the regional dialogue between the two Governments over camp\nclosure and the options for Somali refugee within the camp is ongoing. There is potential for this regional\ndialogue to be supported and strengthened through technical assistance, data generation and capacity\nbuilding (taking into account their eligibility for receiving IDA financing) to support the Governments in\nformulating comprehensive regional development responses addressing the needs of both hosted\nrefugees in Kenya and returning refugees in Somalia. An IGAD summit on March 24 and 25, 2017 on\n_Durable solutions for Somalia refugees and the reintegration of returnees in Somalia_, advanced\ncommitments on delivering durable solutions in countries of asylum. It reinforced efforts to enhance\nstabilization and recovery in Somalia. It also called for enhanced sub‐regional co‐operation on a range of\nsecurity, economic and development issues, capitalizing on the opportunities presented by the new\nGovernment in the Republic of Somalia. The project will therefore provide support to IGAD for the\nexpansion of its FDMM Regional Secretariat ‐ the existing regional platform aimed at supporting\ndeveloping responses to forced displacement started under the DRDIP I to carry out activities for the\nbenefit of these two countries’ engagement in the regional dialogue on forced displacement.\n\n\n9. The IGAD, through its FDMM Regional Secretariat, has a critical role under the regional operation\nto advocate holistic regional responses to forced displacement to influence interventions in refugee‐\nhosting and refugee‐producing member states. In this context, the FDMM Regional Secretariat created\nand supported under DRDIP I (P152822) seeks to build the capacities of countries and institutions in the\nHOA including Djibouti, Ethiopia and Uganda. Under DRDIP II (P161067), the Regional Secretariat’s\ncapacity will be further expanded to foster collaboration among all eight member countries including\nKenya and Somalia.\n\n\n10. Through enabling their connection with the IGAD FDMM Regional Secretariat will help Republic\nof Somalia to more effectively participate in the regional dialogue and also to take a lead role in the\nplanning and coordination of displacement‐responsive development in places of return and on addressing\ndisplacement challenges more widely. Somalia’s arrears status and non‐IDA eligibility means that there\nare constraints to the World Bank in directly supporting sustainable return of refugees or the\nimplementation of development responses to forced displacement at the present time. Several other\nactors are already mobilizing support for area‐based multisectoral development investment in places of\nreturn in Somalia as well as defining durable solutions for wider displacement challenges. Such efforts to\nbuild community resilience to support the reintegration of returning refugees while addressing issues of\nvulnerability and internal displacement, are gaining pace. A priority identified to facilitate this process, is\nto build government capacity in Somalia to take a lead role in the planning and coordination of\ndisplacement‐responsive development in places of return and to address displacement challenges more\nwidely. The IGAD FDMM will enable targeted authorities to coordinate and direct such actors through\nimproved access to existing regional tools for capacity building and policy dialogue on forced\ndisplacement.\n\n\n11. For Kenya, the implementation of Dadaab closure has been happening in a phased manner and\nthe proposed activities include rehabilitating Kenyans registered as refugees; shifting of South Sundanese\nand Somali refugees awaiting resettlement to the Kakuma refugee camp; and voluntary repatriation of\n\n\nPage 12 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6974743008613586,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5561068058013916,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7277031540870667,
+ "start": 64,
+ "end": 65
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.584021270275116,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tripartite Agreement",
+ "confidence": 0.5915205478668213,
+ "start": 35,
+ "end": 37
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5534562468528748,
+ "start": 73,
+ "end": 74
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5485662221908569,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regional dialogue on forced displacement",
+ "confidence": 0.5857906937599182,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "displacement‐responsive development in places of return",
+ "confidence": 0.5075196027755737,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 472
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8333179950714111,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 481
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nSomali refugees from Kenya to Somalia. On February 9, 2017 the High Court of Kenya deemed the GoK\ndecision to close Dadaab as unconstitutional and rendered it null and void, while GoK stated that it will\nappeal this ruling. This development, however, will not affect the project design as the DRDIP II endeavors\nto support the GoK in enhancing the resilience and coping capacity of the host communities related to the\nprotracted presence of refugees around the Kakuma and Dadaab refugee camps. The potential impacts\nof the ongoing consolidation of the refugee camps and increased influx from South Sudan will be limited\nto camps only.\n\n\n12. UNHCR is the agency responsible for moving refugees from Dadaab to Kalobeyei which is an\nexpansion of the Kakuma camp complex in Turkana and implementing the consolidation and potential\nclosure of refugee camps in Dadaab. The proposed project will continue to coordinate closely with UNHCR.\nSupport to UNHCR to develop Kalobeyei into an integrated settlement may potentially be financed\nthrough a Multi‐Donor Trust Fund (MDTF). These interventions in Kalobeyei offer an opportunity for\nbetter integration of the host and refugee community economies for mutual benefits, a proposition that\nis supported by the Turkana County government and reflected in the February 2017 joint World Bank‐\nUNHCR study on ‘Economics of Refugees and their Social Dynamics in Kakuma, Kenya’.\n\n\n13. The DRDIP II will be implemented in a complex and challenging physical, contextual, and\ninstitutional environment, and the project design therefore incorporates a highly responsive and flexible\napproach and a learning by doing philosophy. The project design process has endeavored to carefully map\nexisting projects and programs implemented by the Government or other agencies funded by the GoK,\nWorld Bank, or other development partners, ensuring synergy, preventing duplication, and leveraging\noptimally to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of investments through the DRDIP II investing in (a)\ncreating awareness and generating demand; (b) supporting the creation and/or strengthening of the\nsocial and institutional architecture to ensure last‐mile connectivity to enable communities to access\nbenefits of different programs; and (c) enabling sustainable benefits by supporting skills development\namong beneficiary communities for enhanced participation in implementation, and ensuring resources\nfor operations and maintenance activities.\n\n\n**A. Country Context**\n\n\n14. Kenya can be one of Africa’s success stories. It holds great potential, including from its growing\nyouthful population; dynamic private sector; a platform for change laid down by the new 2010\nConstitution; and its pivotal role within East Africa as well as the region. Yet poverty and inequality\nremains high with 4 out of 10 Kenyans living in poverty and the richest 10 percent of the population\nreceiving 40 percent of the nation’s income (Kenya Country Partnership Strategy [CPS] June 2014).\nGovernance concerns persist; and growth, while solid, has been constrained by low investment and low\nfirm‐level productivity and has yet to take off at the rapid and sustained rates needed to transform the\nlives of ordinary citizens.\n\n\n15. Despite impressive growth and a reported fall in poverty rate, Kenya faces significant\ndevelopmental challenges. Inequality is high with significant differences in opportunities and outcomes\nbetween women and men and, for those living in the remote and most underdeveloped regions in the\nnorth and northeast. Ethnicity remains an important factor in societal development. There is a clear\nrecognition that growth must be inclusive and that prosperity should be shared by all. Enhancing the\ncohesiveness of Kenyan society calls for renewed efforts to include the marginalized and disadvantaged.\n\n\nPage 13 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7813780903816223,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.575336217880249,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7337298393249512,
+ "start": 35,
+ "end": 36
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8869199752807617,
+ "start": 24,
+ "end": 26
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.6397321224212646,
+ "start": 80,
+ "end": 82
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6166594624519348,
+ "start": 24,
+ "end": 26
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.8499460220336914,
+ "start": 360,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2010",
+ "confidence": 0.7570868134498596,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 481
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiary communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6696996092796326,
+ "start": 417,
+ "end": 419
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "2010\nConstitution",
+ "confidence": 0.6142629384994507,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2010",
+ "confidence": 0.7080621719360352,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 481
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Country Partnership Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.9207664728164673,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 533
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CPS",
+ "confidence": 0.651297390460968,
+ "start": 534,
+ "end": 535
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "East Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5356062054634094,
+ "start": 488,
+ "end": 490
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2014",
+ "confidence": 0.9298350214958191,
+ "start": 537,
+ "end": 538
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Kenyans",
+ "confidence": 0.8348793983459473,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 508
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nTo curb poverty, growth must take place in sectors where the majority of the poor depend on their\nlivelihoods. Investment must be redirected to services targeting the poor, including improving agricultural\nproductivity in rural areas, expanding and targeting unified social protection programs that keep people\nfrom slipping into poverty, attracting private sector investment, and enhancing human capital through\nimproved access to quality education and health services at the local level.\n\n\n16. Historically, the north and northeast regions in Kenya have experienced significant deficits in\nservice delivery, infrastructure, and economic opportunities. These are also areas that are\ndisproportionately affected by environmental degradation, climate change impacts, and insecurity. The\nCommission on Revenue Allocation identifies 14 counties as marginalized—Turkana, Mandera, Wajir,\nMarsabit, Samburu, West Pokot, Tana River, Narok, Kwale, Garissa, Kilifi, Taita Taveta, Isiolo, and Lamu—\nbased on the county development index (Commission on Revenue Allocation 2012) which uses indicators\nthat measure the state of a county’s health and education systems, infrastructure, and poverty levels to\nidentify marginalized areas for the allocation of equalization funds. Three of these counties—Garissa,\nWajir, and Turkana—have also been hosting refugees for over two decades, with attendant and\nexacerbated impacts on the environment, natural resources, infrastructure, economy, and service\ndelivery for the hosting communities.\n\n\n17. As of December 2016, 5F [6] Kenya hosted the third largest number of refugees in Africa, after Ethiopia\nand Uganda. Some 494,863 refugees and asylum seekers from Somalia, South Sudan, Ethiopia, and other\ncountries in the region are hosted in Kenya with 272,764 in the Dadaab refugee camps, 154,947 in\nKakuma, and 69,261 in Nairobi. These figures include 326,562 Somali refugees in protracted displacement,\n27,237 Ethiopians, 29,317 Congolese, and 88,391 South Sudanese refugees. Somali refugees are mainly\nlocated in the Dadaab camp while South Sudanese are largely in Kakuma. The Dadaab refugee complex\nhosts refugees in five camps—Dagahaley, Ifo, Ifo 2, Hagadera, and Kambioos; the first three located in\nLagdera (Dadaab) subcounty and the latter two are in Fafi subcounty. It is estimated that about 45,000\nare double registrations which includes 15,000 Kenyans who enrolled as refugees to access food benefits\nand basic services, 20,000 Somali refugees with Kenyan identity cards, and nearly 10,000 belonging to\nfamilies of refugee‐Kenyan marriages (UNHCR 2016). The Kakuma refugees are in four camps, Kakuma I–\nIV, and the Kalobeyei settlement—all in Turkana West subcounty of Turkana County.\n\n\n18. In Kenya, the Refugee Affairs Secretariat 6F [7], responsible for refugee management, is part of the\nMinistry of Interior and Coordination of National Government that is mainly responsible for internal\nsecurity. Kenya’s Refugee Act 2006 supports an encampment policy where, following status\ndetermination, refugees are obliged to reside in a camp with their movement outside the camps being\nrestricted. Article 16 of the act gives the minister responsible for refugee affairs the authority to designate\nareas in Kenya to be refugee camps. Domestic refugee laws of Kenya effectively limit the refugees’ right\nto work by imposing the same restrictions and conditions applicable to aliens and do not have provisions\ndealing with extending services to refugees (details in Annex 1).\n\n\n19. With regard to the host population, the county governments are now responsible for delivering\nmost basic services including early childhood development, health, agriculture extension, water and\nsanitation, and environmental services. The respective line ministries in the national‐level government\n\n\n6 UNHCR Factsheet December 2016.\n7 The Refugee Affairs Secretariat replaced the Department of Refugee Affairs following an announcement on May 6, 2016.\n\n\nPage 14 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6533702611923218,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Commission on Revenue Allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.9640135765075684,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 150
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.9606562852859497,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "county development index",
+ "confidence": 0.9994589686393738,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Commission on Revenue Allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.9991734623908997,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 199
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2012",
+ "confidence": 0.9993922710418701,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees and asylum seekers",
+ "confidence": 0.5582438111305237,
+ "start": 311,
+ "end": 315
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "double registrations",
+ "confidence": 0.5737988948822021,
+ "start": 453,
+ "end": 455
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.8624579906463623,
+ "start": 497,
+ "end": 498
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9055847525596619,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 499
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees and asylum seekers",
+ "confidence": 0.6457757949829102,
+ "start": 311,
+ "end": 315
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenyan identity cards",
+ "confidence": 0.5011945366859436,
+ "start": 479,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.857913613319397,
+ "start": 497,
+ "end": 498
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.6742145419120789,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 499
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6016777753829956,
+ "start": 362,
+ "end": 364
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Refugee Act 2006",
+ "confidence": 0.7563514709472656,
+ "start": 570,
+ "end": 573
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5962727069854736,
+ "start": 531,
+ "end": 532
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2006",
+ "confidence": 0.7052727937698364,
+ "start": 572,
+ "end": 573
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.734746515750885,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 465
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "UNHCR Factsheet",
+ "confidence": 0.5827316045761108,
+ "start": 714,
+ "end": 716
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.6781628727912903,
+ "start": 714,
+ "end": 715
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6961874961853027,
+ "start": 618,
+ "end": 619
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9004862904548645,
+ "start": 717,
+ "end": 718
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8832917213439941,
+ "start": 632,
+ "end": 633
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ncontinue to be responsible for the education and social protection services while the former Ministry for\nNorthern Kenya is now a department under the Ministry of Devolution and Planning.\n\n\n20. At a regional level, the IGAD 7F [8], a regional economic community, and its FDMM Regional Secretariat\nare well equipped and has the mandate to provide capacity and systems development support for\nmember governments to lead development responses to forced displacement. Under DRIDP, a US$5\nmillion grant to the IGAD has enabled the establishment of the Regional Secretariat with presence in\nNairobi and Djibouti with the necessary capacities to (a) advocate holistic regional responses to FDMM\ninformed by data generated on displacement to influence interventions in both refugee‐hosting and\nrefugee‐producing member states; (b) support policy dialogue with member states and academic and\nresearch institutions on transitional/progressive solutions to displacement; (c) generate evidence on\ninnovative management of the impacts of FDMM through research; (d) build the capacities of countries\nand institutions in the HOA to innovatively respond to FDMM; (e) undertake knowledge management and\nfocused Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of DRDIP implementation; (f) forge partnerships between\nhumanitarian and development actors in the HOA region to rethink the application of durable solutions;\nand (g) consolidate the capacity of the IGAD to respond to FDMM and be a strong actor, both regionally\nand internationally, in discussions affecting the HOA. Kenya and Somalia will become members of the\nProject Regional Steering Committee hosted by the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat along with other\nDRDIP countries—Ethiopia, Uganda, and Djibouti. The additional US$3 million grant will help the IGAD to\nexpand the regional platform to cover all member states, particularly for building the capacities of\ncountries and institutions in the HOA to innovatively respond to FDMM as well as the aim of forging\npartnerships between humanitarian and development actors in the HOA region to rethink the application\nof durable solutions.\n\n\n**B. Sectoral and Institutional Context**\n\n\n21. Kenya, which has been hosting refugees since 1991, has remained relatively peaceful till recent\nyears. Both Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps are located close to the international borders and the\nhost communities in Turkana, Garissa, and Wajir Counties are underdeveloped and face poverty and\nunemployment, deficits in human capital development and social service delivery, and limited access to\nbasic infrastructure. Investments in these traditionally underserved border areas, under the proposed\noperation, are firmly aligned with the national priority for Kenya as reflected in the North and North\nEastern Kenya Development Initiative (NEDI) which covers the three counties affected by protracted\nrefugee presence.\n\n\n22. According to the World Bank‐UNHCR study on ‘Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the\nHorn of Africa”, the impact of refugee presence on Kenyan hosts has been positive overall with respect to\nsocial and economic impacts, though there have been significant negative impacts on the environment\nand natural resources. Various World Bank‐UNHCR studies and the multi‐stakeholder consultations in\nboth Kakuma and Dadaab, especially with host communities, refugees, and various partner agencies,\nduring preparation, reveal a number of impacts that refugee presence has on hosting areas. These include\nincreased competition—direct and indirect—for basic social services such as health, education, and\ndrinking water; a degraded physical and natural environment because of high pressure on biomass to\nmeet energy and construction needs; limited livelihood opportunities; and decreasing water availability\n\n\n8 IGAD is among the 8 Regional Economic Communities of the African Union.\n\n\nPage 15 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.7255244851112366,
+ "start": 75,
+ "end": 76
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.6618122458457947,
+ "start": 198,
+ "end": 199
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "knowledge management and\nfocused Monitoring and Evaluation",
+ "confidence": 0.5963771939277649,
+ "start": 225,
+ "end": 232
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.5634545087814331,
+ "start": 214,
+ "end": 215
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "member states",
+ "confidence": 0.5806335210800171,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 173
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.8907489776611328,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "HOA",
+ "confidence": 0.5035277605056763,
+ "start": 361,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6775887608528137,
+ "start": 410,
+ "end": 411
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "North and North\nEastern Kenya Development Initiative",
+ "confidence": 0.5331656336784363,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank‐UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.7521147727966309,
+ "start": 524,
+ "end": 528
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nevidenced by deeper boreholes and increased costs for water transport; crowded health centers and\nclassrooms; and increased distances, time, or cost for collecting wood for cooking and lighting. Informal\neconomic activities and remittances augment the buying power of refugees and the refugee camps are a\nmajor market for host‐produced livestock and agricultural products as well as fuel wood and charcoal.\nCompetition over the meagre livelihood opportunities and the dwindling natural resources is a driver of\nlatent and potential conflicts between the hosts and the refugees.\n\n\n23. The capacity of the three refugee‐hosting counties, Garissa, Turkana, and Wajir, are relatively\nweak. However, with the most ambitious and rapid devolution process under way in Kenya, these counties\nare keen to tackle long‐term and deeply entrenched disparities in their regions; shift from a highly\ncentralized, top‐down to a more responsive bottom‐up form of governance with greater autonomy;\nreduce unequal access of the population to basic services; and address key drivers of conflict related to\nenvironment and natural resource management. In this context, the proposed project is well placed to\nbuild on and augment the ongoing efforts by the Government and the World Bank through the\nAccountable Devolution Program and the NEDI by contributing to capacity enhancement of local\nauthorities and governments, and the active engagement of communities and grassroots institutions in\nthe local planning, decision‐making process, and oversight of public services; and in the implementation\nand operation and maintenance of infrastructure.\n\n\n24. In Somalia, during the past 20 years, the humanitarian community has been leading the response\nto the needs and protection of Somali IDPs and refugee returnees. This has helped in life‐saving provision\nbut conversely it has also resulted in fragmentation of service provision across sectors and has mostly\nfocused on settlements and camps for displaced persons, with little attention to the broader needs of\nhost communities and receiving communities in the absence of an area‐based planning approach and\ninsufficient government leadership. The recent pressures posed by refugee return have galvanized the\ndemand among government authorities, donors, UN agencies, and nongovernmental organizations\n(NGOs) for a more coordinated and longer‐term development response alongside the humanitarian\nresponse; with stronger leadership by the Government at federal, state, and local government levels.\n\n\n**C. Higher‐Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes**\n\n\n25. The proposed operation will directly contribute to the twin goals of the World Bank Group’s global\nstrategy: ending extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity in a sustainable manner. The central\nrationale behind the DRDIP II is that the World Bank Group cannot effectively achieve these twin goals\nwithout first engaging more intensively and creatively to address the complex development challenges\nthat are linked to conflict and the impact of forced displacement across the globe, particularly in the HOA\nand in Kenya.\n\n\n26. The ‘Forward Look’ of the World Bank Group recognizes that protecting the poor and displaced\nfrom fragility and violence is a key developmental challenge for the next decade, in a context of the\npotential rise of fragile and conflict‐affected areas around the world, particularly in Africa. The DRDIP II\nwill respond to the rising client demand for lessening the human and economic impacts of conflict and\nviolence by supporting the host communities and the refugees, reconstructing and rehabilitating critical\nsocioeconomic infrastructure, and, importantly, by containing regional spillovers of conflicts. The DRDIP\nII is also closely aligned with the World Bank’s Strategy for Addressing Forced Displacement, presented to\nthe Development Committee, through a developmental approach to support host communities to better\n\n\nPage 16 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nmanage the shocks and impacts of the refugee presence. The proposed project also responds to priorities\narticulated in IDA17 and IDA18, wherein gender and fragile and conflict‐affected situations are special\nthemes, and also, in particular, commitments for increased attention to gender‐based violence (GBV) in\nfragile and conflict‐affected situations—a dedicated indicator in the IDA17 and IDA18 Results\nFrameworks, as well as forced displacement situations, with the establishment of the subwindow for\nrefugees in the IDA18 replenishment process.\n\n\n27. The DRDIP II contributes to the World Bank’s Africa Development Strategy, especially Pillar 2\n(Vulnerability and Resilience), because it is designed to mitigate the impacts of refugee presence on\nvulnerable host communities to improve their resilience and strengthen the capacity of the public sector.\nThe project supports the Regional HOA Initiative recommendations regarding a development intervention\nthat addresses refugee‐hosting areas and building host community resilience by addressing negative\nenvironmental and economic impacts and by investing in infrastructure to improve economic\nopportunities for refugees and host communities. Global experience shows that self‐reliant refugees are\nbetter prepared to return to their countries of origin (World Bank 2015). Significantly, the DRDIP’s\ninvestments in historically under‐resourced marginal counties of Kenya will seek to improve the social and\neconomic well‐being of households hosting refugees and mitigating the development deficits exacerbated\nby protracted refugee presence. In addition, the proposed project will support community involvement\nin prioritizing investments and county governments in comprehensive planning and implementation thus\nensuring investments that are responsive to community needs with greater potential for ownership and\nsustainability.\n\n\n28. The DRDIP II will also contribute to Kenya’s key priorities identified in the World Bank’s CPS for\nFY2014–2018 (Report number 88940). (87024‐KE), of reducing poverty and inequality by helping achieve\nobjectives of improved social service delivery for vulnerable groups, particularly women; greater citizen\nfeedback on the quality of service delivery in key sectors; improved agriculture productivity; enhanced\ntransparency in the use of public resources; greater involvement of the private sector; and reduced\nvulnerability to climate change, especially in the Arid and Semi‐Arid Lands (ASALs). The project also fits\nwell with the third pillar of the CPS—building consistency and equity—delivering a devolution dividend as\nit supports building capacities of counties, subcounties, and communities.\n\n\n29. For Somalia, the project responds directly to priorities outlined within the Somalia Interim\nStrategy Note (ISN) FY2014–2016 (Report number 83466). A key facet of the ISN for Somalia is attention\nto vulnerability as a critical cross‐cutting theme to lay the foundation for tackling poverty over the longer\nterm in Somalia. The ISN further advances the need for addressing different dimensions of vulnerability\nand marginalization, as related, among other issues, to IDPs. The proposed project will also contribute to\nthe achievement of the new National Development Plan (NDP) 2017–2019. Specifically, the project will\nenable the realization of commitments under the Resilience Pillar (Pillar 9) of the NDP, which aims for the\nsustainable reintegration of the displaced persons and returnees: “to reverse the trend of protracted\ndisplacement and substantially reduce the number of IDPs in such displacement by facilitating and\nsupporting durable solutions that bring them back into mainstream life and address underlying causes of\ntheir displacement and its protracted nature.”\n\n\nPage 17 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA17",
+ "confidence": 0.7151102423667908,
+ "start": 43,
+ "end": 44
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5343263149261475,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5245683789253235,
+ "start": 243,
+ "end": 244
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9374005198478699,
+ "start": 235,
+ "end": 237
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9064902067184448,
+ "start": 255,
+ "end": 256
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY2014–2018",
+ "confidence": 0.8971226215362549,
+ "start": 343,
+ "end": 346
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CPS",
+ "confidence": 0.7749207019805908,
+ "start": 341,
+ "end": 342
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9565384387969971,
+ "start": 337,
+ "end": 339
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8706637024879456,
+ "start": 329,
+ "end": 330
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY2014–2018",
+ "confidence": 0.913894772529602,
+ "start": 343,
+ "end": 346
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CPS",
+ "confidence": 0.5726470947265625,
+ "start": 443,
+ "end": 444
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "building consistency and equity",
+ "confidence": 0.5984164476394653,
+ "start": 445,
+ "end": 449
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7671847343444824,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "FY2014–2016",
+ "confidence": 0.582185685634613,
+ "start": 488,
+ "end": 491
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Interim\nStrategy Note",
+ "confidence": 0.7628064155578613,
+ "start": 481,
+ "end": 485
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9818968772888184,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "National Development Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.5309988856315613,
+ "start": 567,
+ "end": 570
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8104049563407898,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 471
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "displaced persons and returnees",
+ "confidence": 0.5188405513763428,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES**\n\n\n**A. PDO**\n\n\n30. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve access to basic social services, expand\neconomic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting refugees in\nthe target areas in the Recipient’s territory.\n\n\n31. In line with the regional project, the DRDIP II will ensure that citizens participate and engage in\nthe process of identifying and prioritizing their developmental needs, including expanding socioeconomic\ninfrastructure and livelihood opportunities to improve self‐reliance among refugee‐hosting communities,\nimproving social cohesion between refugees and host communities, increasing the voices and roles of\ncitizens in decision making regarding development, and eliciting a greater demand for social\naccountability. The operational approach will be CDD and will involve (a) supporting grassroots institutions\nto be more inclusive and representative, and build their capacities; (b) ensuring that the voices of all\ncommunities/groups are heard in the decision‐making process; (c) strengthening decentralized\ngovernment administrative functions; and (d) investing in public service delivery and contributing to social\ncohesion among beneficiary communities.\n\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries**\n\n\n32. The project will target communities in refugee‐hosting areas that have seen protracted presence\nof refugees with project investments potentially benefiting both the host and refugee communities\nfollowing an area‐based development approach. The project is potentially expected to benefit a total host\npopulation of 1,041,436 8F [9] and a total refugee population of 439,461 as of December 2016 (Table 1).\n\n\n**Table 1. Beneficiary Details**\n\n|County|Subcounty|Host Population
(Direct Beneficiaries)|Refugee Population
(Indirect Beneficiaries)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Turkana|Turkana West|409,490|163,192|\n|Wajir|Wajir South|167,605|276,269|\n|Garissa|Dadaab|208,048|208,048|\n||Fafi|129,904|129,904|\n||Lagdera|126,389|126,389|\n|**Total**||**1,041,436**|**439,461**|\n\n\n\n33. The project will enable communities to identify and prioritize investments with a specific focus on\nwomen, female‐headed households, and youth, groups that are disproportionately affected by\ndisplacement. Even though the project is focused on the needs of host communities, its holistic approach\nwill ensure that refugees will benefit from its investments in socioeconomic infrastructure, environmental\namelioration, and livelihood opportunities contributing to the design of transitional/progressive solutions\nfor refugees in a more conducive and opportunistic social and economic ecosystem. Such area‐based\ndevelopment approach will also mitigate latent and potential conflicts caused by increased competition\nfor services, livelihoods, and natural resources. Currently, there are existing/established committees\n\n\n9 Projected 2017 population figures.\n\n\nPage 18 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\namong both refugees and host communities that meet regularly, discuss outstanding issues, resolve\nproblems, and jointly devise solutions and monitor progress. These arrangements will be harnessed and\nreinforced by the project to encourage interaction and greater social cohesion between the refugees and\nhost communities. It is envisaged that the careful integration of community priorities into the county\ngovernment development planning process will ensure ownership and sustainability of investments.\n\n\n34. The project’s institutional beneficiaries include government staff at the national and county levels,\nExecutive Office of the President, different line ministries and specialized agencies in Kenya handling\nrefugee issues and delivery of essential services and the IGAD.\n\n\n35. The benefits to host and refugee communities across the project components are presented in\nTable 2.\n\n\n**Table 2. Beneficiaries of Project Investments**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Component|Subcomponent|Beneficiaries|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1.**
**Social and**
**Economic**
**Infrastructure**
**and Services**|Subcomponent 1(a).
Community Investment
Fund|Both hosts and refugee communities will benefit from
the improved public service delivery and economic
infrastructure. Host communities will undertake area
based planning, and will be responsible for selecting,
prioritizing, implementing and monitoring project
investments.|\n|**Component 1.**
**Social and**
**Economic**
**Infrastructure**
**and Services**|Subcomponent 1(b).
Capacity support for
Local Planning and
Decentralized Service
Delivery|The integrated area based planning and delivery of
decentralized services will benefit both refugees and
host communities|\n|**Component 2.**
**Environmental**
**and Natural**
**Resource**
**Management**|Subcomponent 2(a):
Integrated Natural
Resources Management|Both refugees and host communities will benefit from
the broader environmental and natural resources
management (NRM) activities.
The Labor Intensive Public Works (LIPW) approach
used for implementation will offer employment to
the host communities. It is anticipated that other
actors will design complementary public works
activities that will benefit refugees using DRDIP’s
approach and methodology in Kenya.|\n|**Component 2.**
**Environmental**
**and Natural**
**Resource**
**Management**|Subcomponent 2(b):
Access to Energy|The focus is on the host communities with
complementary investments from the Off‐grid Solar
Project and complemented by UNHCR investments in
the camps. This component will help address the
critical energy needs in the area and reduce adverse
environmental impacts.|\n|**Component 3.**
**Livelihoods**
**Program**|Subcomponent 3 (a):
Support to Traditional
and Non‐Traditional
Livelihoods|Focused on host communities with potential for
sharing of market linkages, technical support,
knowledge and experience sharing with UNHCR and
other partners providing support to refugees.|\n|**Component 3.**
**Livelihoods**
**Program**|Sub‐component 3 (b):
Capacity Building of
Community‐Based|Focused on hosts but support to community groups in
the camps will be extended through partner
organizations.|\n\n\n\nPage 19 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Organizations for
Livelihoods|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Component 4.**
**Project**
**Management,**
**Monitoring and**
**Evaluation, and**
**Knowledge**
**sharing**||County and national government authorities will
benefit from the integrated planning, Monitoring and
Evaluation (M&E), and knowledge sharing on area
based planning and refugee policy harmonization in
the region under the IGAD.|\n|**Component 5.**
**Support to IGAD**
**for Expansion of**
**the Regional**
**Secretariat on**
**FDMM**||Expanding IGAD’s capacity at the regional level to
contribute in comprehensive displacement‐sensitive
government‐led development support for refugee
returnees, IDPs, and host and return communities in
member countries.|\n|**Components 1 to**
**4 **|By addressing the pressing needs of host communities, which were further
exacerbated by the presence of refugees, the project will help mitigate impacts
of protracted refugee presence.|By addressing the pressing needs of host communities, which were further
exacerbated by the presence of refugees, the project will help mitigate impacts
of protracted refugee presence.|\n\n\n**C. PDO‐Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n36. The following key indicators will be used to track progress toward the PDO:\n\n\n(a) Beneficiaries with access to social and economic services and infrastructure (disaggregated\nby type of service and target group) 9F [10] (number)\n\n\n(b) Direct project beneficiaries (number), of which percent of females (percent)\n\n\n(c) Beneficiaries of economic development activities that report an increase in income\n(disaggregated by type of service, gender, and target group) (number)\n\n\n(d) Land area where sustainable environmental management practices have been adopted as a\nresult of the project (hectare)\n\n\n(e) Regional Secretariat’s capacity assessment plan and annual progress reports reflecting the\nexpanded mandate endorsed by participating countries (number)\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**A. Project Components**\n\n\n37. The DRDIP II is being processed as part of the regional operation that seeks to address the impacts\nof forced displacement on countries and communities in the HOA that are hosting refugees. It is a multi‐\nsectoral development response by the GoK which addresses unmet social, economic, and environmental\nneeds in local host communities in the three refugee‐hosting counties.\n\n\n10 The target group will be disaggregated by gender, host, and refugee communities, as appropriate.\n\n\nPage 20 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n38. The key drivers that informed the project design include (a) focus on addressing priority needs\nidentified by communities hosting refugees; and (b) use of government systems including fiduciary\nsystems, structures, and institutions to deliver a development response to forced displacement. Given the\nsignificant development deficits in the three project counties, the DRDIP II seeks to enhance the\ninvestments in hitherto underserved host areas and communities and to strengthen the government\ninstitutions and systems for delivering basic services and for enhanced absorption and utilization of\nresources following an areas‐based development approach. This is being done in close collaboration with\nother World Bank‐supported interventions in the three counties under the NEDI.\n\n\n39. **Harnessing synergy.** Collaboration across Global Practices is an important organizing principle for\nthe proposed operation and the DRDIP II is building on the experiences and good practices of related\nsectors and operations and at the same time ensuring close collaboration with other ongoing and pipeline\noperations in the area to prevent duplication. The NEDI, focused on transformative and integrated\n(agriculture, energy, transport, cash transfers and water) investments, offers a particularly good\nopportunity to forge strong collaboration with county and national governments, the private sector,\nCommunity‐based Organizations (CBO), and development partners. Other complementary projects\nsupporting the three project counties include the following:\n\n\n(a) **Kenya Off‐grid Solar Energy Access Project (KOSAP), P160009.** Under this project there will\nbe provided solar energy access to households and public institutions and will also install\nphoto voltaic‐powered water pumps for potable water and irrigation. The project is\nexpected to generate employment for youth through operations and maintenance that\nwould be required for solar systems and expand the presence of private enterprise.\n\n\n(b) **Water and Sanitation Improvement Project (WaSSIP), P096367.** Under this project, a study\nis being undertaken to assess groundwater quality, availability, and current extraction\npatterns of the Merti Aquifer to propose a management plan for its sustainable use in the\nhost communities of the Dadaab refugee camp. It will also support the host communities in\nGarissa County with water services.\n\n\n(c) **Climate Smart Agriculture Project (CSAP), P154784.** This project is aimed to increase\nagricultural productivity and build resilience to climate risks among smallholder farming and\npastoral communities in vulnerable counties, which includes the host population around the\nDadaab refugee camp. Farmers and pastoralists will be assisted with improved agricultural\ntechnologies, innovations, and management practices; access to quality agro‐weather and\nmarket information will be improved to enable farmers and herders make decisions that are\nmore economically advantageous; and crop and livestock insurance will be strengthened to\nreduce production risks.\n\n\n(d) In addition, Garissa and Wajir Counties will also benefit from the institutional support being\nprovided by the Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) under the MDTF for the\nKenya Accountable Devolution Program.\n\n\n40. **Cross Cutting Themes.** The project will support two cross‐cutting themes: Promoting social\ncohesion between host and refugee communities by addressing drivers of conflict, and addressing the\nGBV using an integrated approach.\n\n\nPage 21 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n41. **Social cohesion.** The DRDIP’s efforts in Kenya at addressing the competition and potential\nconflicts that limited livelihood opportunities, degraded environmental and natural resources and basic\nsocial services and economic infrastructure are expected to ease tensions and foster positive relationships\nbetween the host and the refugee communities in the targeted areas. The prioritization of investments\naddressing the drivers of conflict through an area‐based approach could potentially offer ‘quick‐wins’ that\nbenefit both the host and refugee communities, thus easing tensions and deepening integration between\nthe host communities and the refugees. This approach will also strengthen the community’s confidence\nin the devolved public systems and project’s approach to mitigating potential conflicts.\n\n\n42. **GBV.** The entrenched norms and practices that perpetuate uneven power dynamics between men\nand women, further exacerbate the conditions of women and girls in the project areas, which are\nunderdeveloped and suffer from insecurity. Such norms and practices get further accentuated by the\nlimited access to basic social services, natural resources, and livelihoods in the target areas of the\nproposed project poses particular challenges for women and girls. The long distances traversed by women\nin search of water and fuel wood and for accessing education and health services increase the risk and\nexposure of women and girls, as well as boys, to GBV. The DRDIP II in Kenya seeks to ensure that the\nimplementation of interventions and subprojects under the three investment components related to\nbasic social services and economic infrastructure, environmental and natural resources management, and\ntraditional and non‐traditional livelihoods, are gender‐informed and contribute to GBV prevention and\nresponse among target beneficiaries of the project.\n\n\n43. Some of the envisaged activities that will contribute to addressing the drivers of GBV include the\nfollowing: (a) communication strategy including awareness generation at all levels of implementation\nusing multiple and diverse communication channels that are gender informed and focus on increasing\nawareness around available services for GBV survivors and challenge the norms and attitudes that\ncontribute to the acceptability of GBV; (b) social services—health, education, water supply—that are\ndesigned to take into account ease and security of access and contribute to GBV prevention and response\nfrom their sector’s unique entry points; (c) environmental amelioration taking into account needs of\nwomen with respect to fodder and fuel to enhance safe access and reduce time and energy in gathering\nthese from distant areas and support for off‐grid lighting and heating and improved cookstoves,\nspecifically addressing the needs of women to reduce risk of exposure to GBV; (d) income opportunities\nfor women being enhanced through LIPWs, skills‐based jobs/employment, access and ownership of\nproductive assets, technical assistance, finance, and technology; (e) strengthening of women’s social,\nsavings and credit, and producer groups as platforms for enhancing social capital, addressing gender\ninequalities, and economic networks; and (f) supporting livelihoods for women which will reduce their\nexposure to GBV from existing livelihoods such as gathering and sale of fuel wood and firewood as a\nlivelihood opportunity/strategy. Economic activities with women will be coupled with gender dialogue\ngroups with men to reinforce the messages challenging gender norms and expectations that contribute\nto the acceptability of GBV. These groups will reinforce the messages from the first activity.\n\n\n44. The proposed project responds to priorities articulated in IDA17 highlighting gender and fragile\nand conflict‐affected situations as special themes and, in particular, commitments for increased attention\nto GBV in fragile and conflict‐affected situations—a dedicated indicator in the IDA 7 and IDA18 Results\nFrameworks. In addition, the proposed project is also responsive to the IDA18 commitments related to\nGBV. It will establish links with the extensive analytical work undertaken in Kenya and the region, including\nlearning initiatives supported through the State and Peace‐Building Fund and Learning on Gender and\n\n\nPage 22 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nConflict in Africa Program trust funds and those through operations such as the Great Lakes Emergency\nSexual and Gender‐based Violence and Women’s Health Project and the Global Platform for Sexual and\nGender‐based Violence in Fragile and Conflict‐Affected Situations.\n\n\n45. The DRDIP II in Kenya seeks to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the\npresence of refugees in host communities through interlinked technical and investment components as\ndescribed in the following paragraphs. A more detailed description is in Annex 2.\n\n\n**Component 1: Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services (approximately US$45 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n46. This component will specifically support improvements in access to quality basic services for the\nhost communities. The key services will include education, primary and secondary health services, water\nsupply, sanitation, and hygiene. The guiding principles will be (a) prioritization based on identified\ncommunity needs, especially by girls and women; (b) inputs complementary to ongoing support from the\ncounty and national governments as well as other development partners and civil society organizations\n(CSOs); (c) compliance with quality standards and norms of the GoK; and (d) strong accountability to\ncitizens and credible systems for M&E.\n\n\n47. **Subcomponent 1(a): Community Investment Fund (approximately US$42.5 million equivalent).**\nThis subcomponent seeks to improve community access to basic social services and economic\ninfrastructure by providing investment funds that, together with community contributions, will expand\nand improve service delivery and build infrastructure for local development. Investments will be\nidentified, prioritized, implemented, and monitored by beneficiary communities. The target community,\nwith guidance from the county government, will identify and prioritize the specific social services and\neconomic infrastructure to be funded under this subcomponent through the CDD approach. Only those\nsubprojects for which concerned government entities can cover their operating costs and have staff will\nbe supported, ensuring the sustainability of the interventions. In addition, water supply schemes that are\nable to shift to solar pumping, thus ensuring reduced operation and maintenance costs, will also be\nsupported.\n\n\n48. **Subcomponent 1(b): Capacity Support for Local Planning and Decentralized Service Delivery**\n**(approximately US$2.5 million equivalent).** This subcomponent seeks to improve the service‐delivery\ncapacity of local and National level government authorities. Specifically, it will support capacity building\nof the county and national government authorities and local implementing institutions in the areas of\ncommunity‐driven planning process, local development management, service‐delivery capacities\nenhancement, mainstreaming of project interventions with government’s development planning and\nbudgeting process, coordination of all development stakeholders at local‐level, and community‐level\ndevelopment learning. The project will also support technical assistance to reinforce the capacity of\nExecutive Office of the President, line Ministries and specialized agencies, including the recruitment of\nnational and international technical assistance for the planning, engineering design, procurement,\nconstruction management, safeguards, and technical monitoring of physical investments.\n\n\nPage 23 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Component 2: Environmental and Natural Resource Management (approximately US$20 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n49. This component aims to decrease environmental impacts of protracted refugee presence which\nhas resulted in deterioration of the natural resource base because of deforestation resulting from the\noverexploitation of wood and other non‐timber forest products for various purposes (shelter, firewood,\ncharcoal, food, medicines, and so on), degradation of grazing lands, loss of wildlife, soil erosion, open\ndisposal of solid waste (especially plastics), and uncontrolled abstraction of groundwater for domestic\nconsumption and livestock. The project will therefore support environmental and natural resource\nrestorative measures that will rehabilitate and improve the productivity of the natural resources that will\nbe executed taking into account community capacity needs and site specificities, including the use of local\nindigenous knowledge in the host areas. The proposed activities that will enhance environmental\nmanagement include improving access to energy in the form of environmentally friendly alternative\nsources of household energy and reducing risks associated with fuel wood supply and demand.\n\n\n50. **Subcomponent 2(a): Integrated Natural Resources Management (approximately US$18 million**\n**equivalent)** . The objective of this subcomponent is to undertake targeted at‐scale community‐based\nenvironmental and natural resource restorative measures that will be beneficial for the local\ncommunities, environment, livestock, and wildlife resources in the host areas. Key strategies for\nenvironmental rehabilitation will include (a) natural regeneration; (b) vegetation (grass and tree)\nreseeding; (c) tree planting (reforestation/afforestation with appropriate species); (d) rainwater\nharvesting; and (e) solid waste (especially plastics) and pollution control. Specific indicative activities\ninclude establishment of tree nurseries in the target sites, assisted forest regeneration, establishment of\ncommunity enclosures (‘greenbelts’) of degraded forest areas to allow natural regeneration of indigenous\ntrees where possible, promotion of drylands non‐timber forest products (for example, frankincense, gum\narabic, fruits, beekeeping/honey, gums, resins, aloe, and medicines), grassland/rangeland rehabilitation\nthrough reseeding and seeding of degraded areas, rainwater harvesting through surface water harvesting\nworks (for example, semicircular contour bunds, diversions, pans, sand dams), and implementation of\nplastic waste cleanup and recycling plans through community environmental committees. The choice of\nspecific strategy/activity or combination thereof will depend on site specificities and community dynamics\n(including the use of traditional local knowledge). The primary implementation modality for the\ncomponent will be LIPWs and specific efforts will be made to integrate women—not only into the labor\nopportunities but also as beneficiaries of the activities (details in Annex 7).\n\n\n51. **Subcomponent 2(b): Access to Energy (approximately US$2 million equivalent).** This\nsubcomponent seeks to improve the host communities’ access to energy by promoting the better use of\nenergy resources and increasing access to alternative sources of energy. Support will be given to\ninterventions that address the host communities’ energy requirements, such as domestic cooking and\nlighting; social services, such as schools and health services; and productive activities, including lighting\nfor small shops and businesses and for manufacturing and processing. Household cooking is currently\nbased on firewood and charcoal. To address this concern, improved cooking devices will be introduced\nwith appropriate community consultations about methods of cooking and baking and what types of\nfirewood are locally available for Wajir and Garissa building on lessons from the KOSAP (P160096) that\nwill support cook stoves in Turkana. Training will be provided on the use of the new devices, including the\npreparation of fuel. Attention will be given to monitoring use, regular maintenance, and repairs. Solar\nlanterns and lamps are among the options for meeting home and street lighting as well as mobile phone\n\n\nPage 24 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ncharging needs. The inputs provided by the project will be complementary to the proposed off‐grid solar\noperation.\n\n\n**Component 3: Livelihoods Program (approximately US$27.5 million equivalent)**\n\n\n52. Refugee‐hosting communities in the target areas derive their income either from traditional\nlivelihoods including pastoralism, agropastoralism, and small‐scale agriculture; and/or non‐traditional\nlivelihoods including small businesses, skills‐based jobs, and service enterprises. Both forms of livelihoods\nare characterized by low‐level technologies and skills, which are often characterized by inherent low\nproductivity and incomes. The component will support interventions aimed at improving the productivity\nof traditional and non‐traditional livelihoods and strengthening the resilience of communities. The\nsupport will include improved access to technology and equipment, storage and processing infrastructure,\nand finance. There will be priority attention to building community institutions through mobilization and\nselection of beneficiary groups, the formation of community groups for livelihoods, and strengthening\ncapacities of producer cooperatives for accessing input and output markets. The key guiding principles\nwill be (a) emphasis on promoting livelihoods of the most vulnerable, including women and youth; (b)\nbuilding on experiences and tools developed by the Government and partner agencies in promoting\nlivelihoods, and (c) optimizing the existing infrastructure, including those in the refugee camps. The\ncomponent will ensure convergence with other livelihood interventions in the target area.\n\n\n53. **Subcomponent 3(a): Support to Traditional and Non‐Traditional Livelihoods (approximately**\n**US$25 million equivalent).** The objective of this subcomponent is to increase the production and\nproductivity of pastoralism (livestock), agropastoralism (crop and livestock), agriculture (crops and\nlivestock) and fisheries; and commercialize their livelihood activities for improved incomes, employment,\nand self‐reliance. Support for on‐farm activities primarily will aim to improve lives of\npastoralists/agropastoralists through enhancing the production and productivity of livestock (goats,\ncamels, cattle, and poultry) and dryland farming with emphasis on rebuilding pastures. The support to off‐\nfarm activities will aim at strengthening the value chains for selected commodities and promoting\nagribusinesses. This, in turn, is envisaged to be achieved through access to input and output markets as\nwell as enhanced skills for increased employability, enterprise development, promotion of other income\ngenerating activities; improved access to financial services (through the promotion of grassroots financial\ninstitutions); and strengthening technical and advisory services to help host communities identify viable\nbusinesses and/or investment opportunities and income‐generating activities.\n\n\n54. **Subcomponent 3(b): Capacity Building of Community‐Based Organizations for Livelihoods**\n**(approximately US$2.5 million equivalent).** The objective of this subcomponent is to improve the\ncapacities of community institutions for promoting inclusive and sustainable livelihoods. The support will\ninclude establishing and building the capacity of community institutions for livelihoods, given the CDD\napproach of the project and primacy of community institutions in inclusive implementation and\nsustainability of project investments. For livelihoods promotion, the community institutions are\nCommunity Groups (CGs), village level livelihoods sub‐committees, ward/cluster level committees, and\nproducer organizations. These community institutions will be trained in group management, conflict\nresolution, savings, financial literacy, bookkeeping, and procurement; and encouraged to have regular\nmeetings to promote savings, interloaning, timely repayment, and up‐to‐date books of accounts. In\naddition to this, the subcomponent will support the capacity building and technical assistance for major\nlivelihood activities including business planning and advisory support. The subcomponent will use\n\n\nPage 25 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ntechnology to strengthen the facilitation. The capacity‐building efforts will be implemented by a field\nbased facilitation team/NGO and coordinated by the respective County Integrated Project\nImplementation Units (CIPIU), which will have overall responsibility for the capacity building.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E), and Knowledge Sharing**\n**(approximately US$7.5 million equivalent)**\n\n\n55. The objectives of this component are to ensure enhanced and effective project management,\ncoordination, and implementation and to support the design of the project’s M&E system, which will be\ndescribed in detail in the M&E manual. The implementation of the proposed operation will follow existing\ngovernment structures. While the Steering Committees at national and county levels will provide broader\noversight and ensure cross‐sector coordination, the national and county Technical Committees will ensure\ntechnical guidance and backstopping to project management as well as implementation. The National\nImplementation Support Unit (NPIU) and County Integrated Implementation Support Units (CIPIU) will\nprovide implementation support and monitoring of the project at national and county level. The project\nwill build on existing community‐level structures, and will establish new local‐level institutions as needed,\nincluding Village Level Committees (VLC), Ward Level Committees (WLC), and social audit committees\n(SACs).\n\n\n56. The component will support the design of the project’s management information system (MIS)\nfor monitoring inputs, outputs, and processes; the evaluation of outcome and impacts; environmental\nand social safeguard monitoring; and participatory M&E and internal learning. M&E activities will include\nregular monitoring of the progress and performance of implementation; independent process monitoring\nof the community‐level planning and effectiveness and quality of capacity‐building efforts; and\nundertaking annual thematic studies and outcome as well as impact assessments of the project. The\nproject’s Results Framework will be used as a basis for reporting progress against indicators, including\nprogress toward achieving the PDO and implementation progress. The project will consider the use of\nmobile technologies to increase the reach and frequency of data capturing at the local level and\naggregating it in a platform that could serve as a dashboard.\n\n\n**Component 5: Support to IGAD for Expansion of the Regional Secretariat on FDMM (US$3 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n57. This component will support the expansion of IGAD’s existing Regional Secretariat for FDMM to\ninclude Kenya that will join other DRDIP countries in the Regional Project Steering Committee (RPSC) and\nrepresented by nominees of its national steering committee and the project coordinator. Kenya as well as\nall other IGAD Member States will benefit from the Regional Secretariat‐led activities including research,\nknowledge generation, the documentation of lessons learned to enhance the coordination, knowledge\nsharing, and learning across the project countries. The RPSC will provide oversight of the implementation\nof the regional program and will guide, advise, and support a regional policy dialogue. In addition, this\ncomponent will support DRDIP project countries and other IGAD Member States to: (i) discuss the\nchallenge of the Somalia displacement that they all have in common; and (ii) engage the Republic of\nSomalia to more effectively participate in this dialogue and to take a lead role in the planning and\ncoordination of displacement‐responsive development in places of return and on addressing\ndisplacement challenges more widely (details in Annex 6).\n\n\nPage 26 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E system",
+ "confidence": 0.9289969205856323,
+ "start": 136,
+ "end": 140
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management information system",
+ "confidence": 0.9936059713363647,
+ "start": 296,
+ "end": 299
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring inputs, outputs, and processes",
+ "confidence": 0.9557746052742004,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 310
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "MIS",
+ "confidence": 0.8926637172698975,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 301
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual thematic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.8369705677032471,
+ "start": 370,
+ "end": 373
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "reporting progress against indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6525787115097046,
+ "start": 397,
+ "end": 401
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5845921039581299,
+ "start": 495,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.6714605689048767,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7145510911941528,
+ "start": 495,
+ "end": 496
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Annex 6",
+ "confidence": 0.6595114469528198,
+ "start": 674,
+ "end": 676
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.536666214466095,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n58. The component design takes into account the IDA regional guidelines and the Bank’s policy on\ncountries with loans in nonaccrual status. Somalia’s arrears status and non‐IDA eligibility means that there\nare constraints to large‐scale investment by the World Bank in directly supporting sustainable return of\nrefugees or the implementation of development responses to forced displacement at the present time.\nMultiple other actors are, however, mobilizing support for area‐based multisectoral development\ninvestment in places of return in Somalia as well as defining durable solutions for wider displacement\nchallenges. Those efforts to build community resilience to support the reintegration of returning refugees,\nwhile also addressing issues of vulnerability and internal displacement, are gaining pace.\n\n\n59. The component will be implemented in two stages. In the first stage, the IGAD FDMM Regional\nSecretariat will commission a rapid assessment to assess the capacity, processes, and systems building\nneeds in support of return and reintegration including a quick mapping and profiling of key actors. This\nassessment will build on capacity diagnostic work under way by other actors. The results of the\nassessment will enable the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat to define a plan for bringing Republic of\nSomalia into relevant and existing regional capacity building initiatives being undertaken by the Regional\nSecretariat. This planning exercise will result in an implementation plan to be completed within six months\nof effectiveness of this grant. The implementation plan will be finalized on the basis of consultation with\nkey stakeholders and will be reviewed to be acceptable to the World Bank.\n\n\n60. In the second stage, in subsequent years, activities will be funded in accordance with the agreed\nimplementation plan. Illustrative activities that may be funded under the component include the\nexpansion of existing regional technical assistance provided by the FDMM Regional Secretariat on the\nfollowing topics: (a) Provision of technical assistance for developing relevant policies and appropriate\nguidelines for ensuring a coordinated development response in return areas and to address forced\ndisplacement more widely; (b) Provision of technical assistance for building capacities, systems, and\nprocesses for sustainable return and reintegration of refugees and displaced persons; (c) Development\nand management of a database to include mapping of pressure points, services, spatial planning to\ndetermine gaps in provision, identify priorities for areas and agencies, and prevent duplication and\ninefficiencies; (d) Regular monitoring, reporting, and learning from experiences for scaling up; and (e)\nResponding to ‘just‐in‐time’ needs expressed by the government authorities, which could range from\nproviding an expert with specific skills, to reviewing documents or carrying out assessments.\n\n\n61. The component will also enable the existing IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM based in Nairobi\nand Djibouti to augment its staffing and operational resources to support the expanded mandate. IGAD\nwill manage, contract and ensure fiduciary compliance of all component activities.\n\n\n**B. Project Cost and Financing**\n\n\n62. The DRDIP II will be financed through an IDA Credit of US$100 million equivalent for Kenya and\nan IDA grant of US$3 million equivalent to IGAD to be implemented through its Regional Secretariat on\nFDMM expanded mandate. The total estimated proposed project costs are based on an IDA allocation\n(national allocations and a grant for regional coordination activities) for an overall estimated budget of\nUS$103 million over a five‐year period. The total project cost includes a total regional IDA envelope of\nUS$70 million equivalent –regional IDA Credit of US$67 million to Kenya and IDA Grant of US$3 million to\nIGAD‐ from regional AFR IDA allocation. Total project costs and associated financing are presented in Table\n3.\n\n\nPage 27 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7904844284057617,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.722205638885498,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rapid assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5078495740890503,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 182
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Republic of\nSomalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9380385875701904,
+ "start": 243,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "key actors",
+ "confidence": 0.6172257661819458,
+ "start": 206,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "database",
+ "confidence": 0.9820097088813782,
+ "start": 424,
+ "end": 425
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees and displaced persons",
+ "confidence": 0.8480468392372131,
+ "start": 411,
+ "end": 415
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA allocation",
+ "confidence": 0.7828465104103088,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Total project costs and associated financing",
+ "confidence": 0.7972507476806641,
+ "start": 694,
+ "end": 700
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n63. The proposed project is consistent with the World Bank’s response to addressing forced\ndisplacement by addressing the regional spillover effect of conflict, which can be termed the ‘public bad’\nthrough a development response that seeks to support the host communities in overcoming the shocks\nand impacts of refugees. The DRDIP II has been prepared in close collaboration with UNHCR in Kenya that\nis responsible for the welfare of refugees and the project seeks to strengthen complementarity in\ndisplacement responses through more effective and efficient developmental interventions in Kenya which\nare better aligned with the Government priorities and plans. Because forced displacement is a regional\nchallenge for the HOA, Kenya will join the RPSC hosted by the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat so that\nit contributes to and benefits from knowledge generation and learning and sharing to enable the\nidentification of viable and scalable interventions in participating HOA member countries and to facilitate\neasier and timely sharing and support for quick implementation.\n\n\n**Table 3. Project Financing**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Project Components|Project Cost (US$, millions)|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Project Components**|**Kenya**|**IGAD**|**Total IDA**
**Financing**|**% **|\n|1. Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services|1. Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services|1. Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services|1. Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services|1. Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services|\n|1(a) Community Investment Fund|42.5|—|42.5|41.3|\n|1(b) Capacity Support for Local Planning and
Decentralized Service Delivery|2.5|—|2.5|2.4|\n|**Subtotal**|**45**|**0 **|**45**|**43.7**|\n|2. Environmental and Natural Resource Management|2. Environmental and Natural Resource Management|2. Environmental and Natural Resource Management|2. Environmental and Natural Resource Management|2. Environmental and Natural Resource Management|\n|2(a) Integrated Natural Resources Management|18|—|18|17.5|\n|2(b) Access to Energy|2|—|2|1.9|\n|**Subtota**l|**20**|**0 **|**20**|**19.4**|\n|3. Livelihoods Program|3. Livelihoods Program|3. Livelihoods Program|3. Livelihoods Program|3. Livelihoods Program|\n|3(a) Support to Traditional and Non‐Traditional
Livelihoods|25|—|25|24.3|\n|3(b) Capacity Building for Community‐Based
Organizations for Livelihoods|2.5|—|2.5|2.4|\n|**Subtotal**|**27.5**|**0 **|**27.5**|**26.7**|\n|4. Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation,
and Knowledge Sharing|**7.5**|**0 **|**7.5**|**7.3**|\n|5. Support to IGAD for Expansion of the Regional
Secretariat on FDMM|**0 **|**3 **|**3 **|**2.9**|\n|**Total Project Cost**|**100**|**3 **|**103**|**100**|\n\n\n64. The DRDIP II fully satisfies the four eligibility criteria for accessing regional IDA funding:\n\n\n(a) Kenya is part of the eight HOA countries and its participation along with Djibouti, Ethiopia\nand Uganda will help in achieving the objectives of the regional operation.\n\n\nPage 28 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n(b) Kenya is affected by forced displacement and the proposed project interventions will\nmitigate the negative effects that protracted refugee presence has on the host communities\nand might prevent local conflicts from arising between refugees and hosts. Area‐based\ndevelopment helps to improve social services and livelihoods for refugees and hosts by\nsecuring human capital and self‐reliance, allowing them to contribute to the local\ndevelopment of their host countries and of their countries of origin upon their return. These\ntwo aspects have clear positive spillover effects beyond country boundaries and generate\npositive externalities across countries that are hosting or generating refugees.\n\n\n(c) There is clear evidence of project ownership at the GoK level to address displacement‐\nrelated issues using a broader development approach, demonstrating a strong national\ncommitment to the proposed project.\n\n\n(d) There are opportunities for the harmonization of policies and practices related to forced\ndisplacement in Kenya with other HOA countries under the stewardship of the IGAD;\nespecially given the proposed development of Kalobeyei settlement in Turkana County to\nhost refugees with greater integration with the host communities that are beneficiaries of\nthe DRDIP II, which is a step in the direction of durable solutions.\n\n\n65. The IGAD, a regional economic community, and its Regional Secretariat on FDMM are well\nequipped to support capacity and systems support in return and reintegration contributing to\ndisplacement‐responsive local development and sustainable reintegration of returnees. The Regional\nSecretariat will build on the work of the DRDIP I and facilitate research, knowledge generation, policy\ndialogue and the learning agenda for Kenya along with the other DRDIP project countries and all other\nIGAD Member States. The IGAD is already implementing the World Bank‐supported grant and has\nestablished the Regional Secretariat on FDMM under the regional HOA operation (P152822).\n\n\n66. In addition, the IGAD is also working on three World Bank‐financed regional projects: the IGAD ‐\nBuilding Disaster Resilience to Disasters through Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation\n(P154403), Pastoralism and Stability in the Sahel and Horn of Africa (PASSHA) (P153713) and the\nAFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience Project (P129408). The proposed grant to the IGAD also\nmeets the six eligibility criteria to access a regional IDA grant:\n\n\n(a) The IGAD has the legal status and fiduciary capacity to receive grant funding and the legal\nauthority to carry out the financed activities.\n\n\n(b) The IGAD does not meet eligibility requirements to take on an IDA credit because it does not\ngenerate revenue and is not in a position to repay the credit.\n\n\n(c) The costs and benefits cannot be easily allocated to national programs because of the\nregional nature of the activities to be financed with the IDA grant.\n\n\n(d) The activities are related to coordinated interventions to provide regional public goods in\nthat they are designed to contribute to regional knowledge and results‐generating\nprograms, principally in the areas of forced displacement and the strengthening of IGAD\ncapacity to deliver its mandate on regional peace, security, and development.\n\n\nPage 29 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n(e) Grant cofinancing from other development partners is not readily available or sufficient for\nthe IGAD to undertake identified interventions in selected areas.\n\n\n(f) The regional entity is associated with an IDA‐funded regional operation with which three out\nof its eight member states are involved. The project also conforms to the AFR’s selection\ncriteria for regional operations in Africa, including strategic relevance, regional solutions,\nquality, and partnership.\n\n\n**C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design**\n\n\n67. The proposed project, in line with the regional operation, incorporates key lessons learned with\nrespect to addressing forced displacement at a global level. It benefits from the experiences of relevant\nprojects under implementation in Kenya; and lessons learned from multisectoral CDD‐based projects, and\nthose implemented in weak institutional capacity environments. Key among these are the following:\n\n\n - **Providing parallel service delivery in refugee‐hosting areas as part of a humanitarian**\n**response is unsustainable, inefficient, and costly.** A humanitarian response to forced\ndisplacement often includes the creation of parallel service‐delivery systems with little\nsynergy with mainstream government provisioning, often leading to duplication of\ninfrastructure, low quality of services, and poor outcomes for both refugee and host\ncommunities. It is also unsustainable over the medium to long term. The close collaboration\nbetween the proposed project and UNHCR will contribute to bridging this gap.\n\n\n - **A development approach must invest in local institutions and promote jobs, livelihood**\n**opportunities, and wealth creation for both the host communities and refugees to address**\n**the underlying poverty in and vulnerability of host communities, which is further**\n**exacerbated by the presence of refugees.** The proposed project includes investments in\neconomic assets and infrastructure; community‐based institutions; skills for productive self‐\nemployment; technology; and market interactions to enhance economic opportunities for\nhost communities and refugees, improve incomes, increase self‐reliance, and potentially\nmitigate conflict.\n\n\n - **Affected communities are best suited to identify their needs and priorities, to implement**\n**subprojects, and to manage investments.** The local communities that are hosting refugees\nare better able to plan for and effectively implement investment subprojects. However, the\nprocess of mobilization and planning must be inclusive and participatory to ensure that all\nsocial groups, especially women, youth, and pastoralists (where present), are involved. Clear\ncriteria are needed for identifying, prioritizing, and selecting investments and beneficiaries\nto ensure transparency and ownership. 10F [11] An inclusive facilitation process is crucial to ensure\nthat the voices of disadvantaged groups are expressed and to prevent elite capture. Planning\nshould be led by local governments, with the involvement of key stakeholders and taking\n\n\n11 World Bank. 2013. _Designing Community‐Driven Development Operations in Fragile and Conflict‐Affected Situations. Lessons_\n_from a Stocktaking_ . Washington, DC: World Bank.\n\n\nPage 30 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ninto account ongoing and proposed projects and programs to avoid duplication, to foster\nsynergies, and to ensure downward accountability to the communities.\n\n\n - **There is widespread recognition that increasing access to and use of more efficient, cleaner**\n**cooking and heating solutions in households could yield significant benefits such as**\n**improved women and children’s health, reduced environmental and climate impacts, and**\n**improved gender equality.** Women and girls responsible for gathering cooking fuel are often\nvulnerable to GBV during fuel collection and transport. Clean and efficient cooking devices\nreduce the time spent for biomass collection. There are also positive development impacts\nwhere women are engaging within the clean cooking value chain not only as consumers and\nbeneficiaries of improved stoves but also as producers, distributors, and entrepreneurs for\nclean and efficient cooking solutions.\n\n\n - **VSLAs had significant economic and social impacts under the Learning on Gender and**\n**Conflict in Africa program and were among the most successful intervention of the project**\n**in promoting treatment and prevention of GBV against women and girls in South Kivu.**\nThey promoted economic empowerment of women in the communities, as well as solidarity\nand social cohesion, mutual trust, and have operated as support groups. The proposed\noperation will be promoting VSLAs, especially of women to provide social and economic\nsupport and address GBV issues.\n\n\n - **Key entry points for livelihood support, natural resource management, and/or**\n**infrastructure can potentially deliver resilience support at the community level that is**\n**necessary for addressing climate change adaptation and increasing disaster risk.** F [12] The CDD\napproach adopted under the project has the potential to provide communities with a broad\nplatform for empowerment and poverty reduction in addition to a diverse range of risk\nmanagement for climate change and greater reliance on investments under the sustainable\nenvironment management component, making use of local knowledge and expertise for\nmore effective outcomes.\n\n\n - **Establishing and strengthening social contracts between subnational governments and**\n**communities are means and ends toward the goal of mainstreaming social, economic, and**\n**infrastructure aspects of underserved refugee‐hosting areas.** The state’s limited capacity is\nreflected in poor service delivery and inadequate infrastructure in the refugee‐hosting areas.\nThe project is focused on working through existing local government structures, sensitizing\nleadership, training frontline staff, strengthening systems and processes, and, importantly,\nresponding to community priorities during and after the project.\n\n\n - **A holistic approach is needed to address gender issues.** Women’s participation in the\nproject’s processes is constrained by social structures and cultural norms. Community\nmobilization, consultations, trainings, institution building, and leadership are needed to\ntackle the issue. Project interventions will address the social, economic, infrastructure, and\nprotection needs of women, particularly with regard to sexual‐based violence and GBV. For\n\n\n12 Arnold, Margaret, Robin Mearns, Kaori Oshima, and Vivek Prasad. 2014. Climate and Disaster Resilience: The Role for\nCommunity‐Driven Development. Washington, DC: Social Development Department, World Bank.\n\n\nPage 31 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nexample, 50 percent of the beneficiaries of the livelihood program will be women, and\nimproved access to energy through efficient fuels and cooking devices will lessen women’s\nexposure to indoor air pollution, reduce the risk of sexual‐based violence and GBV, and\nincrease their available time for economic activities.\n\n\n - **LIPWs serve a dual objective of creating temporary employment for beneficiary**\n**households, and development of physical assets of value for local communities.** LIPWs\noffer poor and vulnerable households an opportunity to receive transfers in return for their\nparticipation, smoothen consumption gap, and build assets to respond to and build\nresilience against the negative effects of climate change. LIPW beneficiaries when supported\nwith skills, training, and small grants are able to graduate to a sustainable livelihood.\n\n\n - **Leveraging geospatial tools will provide efficient solutions for coordination, project**\n**targeting, implementation, and M&E, while mitigating physical access constraints.** Given\nthe prevailing logistical and security challenges that limit effective on‐the‐ground access in\nsome of the project areas, remote sensing and geospatial tools will provide solutions for\ndata consolidation, analytics, and operational support. Geospatial capabilities can be\nintegrated and applied to various elements of project implementation, including (a)\ngeographic targeting; (b) remote implementation supervision and coordination with\npartners; and (c) dynamic monitoring and progressive prioritization. To this end, geographic\ninformation related to the implementation of the operation as well as a variety of contextual\nfactors will be gathered through a data management system and used for geospatial analysis\nand implementation support.\n\n\n - **The IGAD has a proven track record on facilitating regional platforms for addressing cross‐**\n**border issues but care must be taken not to substitute for National Government functions.**\nBesides the DRDIP regional grant, the IGAD has been supported by the World Bank for\nregional HOA engagement on issues such as disaster resilience, pastoral livelihoods, and\nregional responses to Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency\nSyndrome (HIV/AIDS). A US$22.5 million Regional HIV/AIDS Partnership Program Support\nProject specifically targeted displaced and cross‐border mobile population. Lessons learned\nfrom these projects prove that the IGAD can act as a credible partner to broker dialogue,\nlearning and knowledge exchange, policy reform, and joint action across member states.\nNevertheless care must be taken to ensure that technical assistance and personnel provided\nto member states on these issues do not run in parallel to nor substitute for government\nresponsibility and engagement. This is particularly pertinent where capacity for\ndevelopment responses to forced displacement among targeted government officials is very\nlow and where government structures are already strained and unable to perform key\nfunctions. While substituting with additional personnel and capacity may assist in allowing\ngreater government leadership, this may not be sustainable if those functions have not been\nabsorbed by long‐term government officials.\n\n\nPage 32 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5226019620895386,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5211408734321594,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7576335668563843,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "poor and vulnerable households",
+ "confidence": 0.8864149451255798,
+ "start": 116,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "LIPWs",
+ "confidence": 0.6042228937149048,
+ "start": 84,
+ "end": 85
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "poor and vulnerable households",
+ "confidence": 0.8159343600273132,
+ "start": 116,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "geographic\ninformation",
+ "confidence": 0.7163035273551941,
+ "start": 295,
+ "end": 297
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data management system",
+ "confidence": 0.9446972012519836,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.5735243558883667,
+ "start": 333,
+ "end": 334
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "displaced and cross‐border mobile population",
+ "confidence": 0.5908588171005249,
+ "start": 431,
+ "end": 438
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n68. The implementation arrangements for the project are guided by four principles that include: (a)\nalign with devolved systems of governance at county, subcounty, and Ward levels; (b) build on ongoing\ninitiatives especially the Accountable Devolution Program and Regional Pastoralist Livelihoods Resilience\nProject; (c) promote coordination within the World Bank and with other partners; and (d) ensure swift\nfunds flow and timely reporting. Table 4 provides a summary of the arrangements.\n\n\n69. The proposed arrangement will include the engagement with existing community structures at\nthe village level complemented with support for enhancing the voice of the traditionally marginalized\nsocial groups for identifying community priorities for service delivery, prepare subproject proposals\nfollowing the operational guidelines, implement the approved subprojects, and keep required records in\na transparent way. In view of this, a VLC will be formed to coordinate village level Community\nDevelopment Plans (CDPs). The VLC will be a five‐member committee selected by the village assembly\nincluding women, youth and the differently abled as representatives. Two representatives (one man and\none woman) from each VLC will form the WLC for coordination and prioritization of subprojects for\ninclusion in work plan at the Ward level. A five‐member Social Audit Committee (SAC) will be selected by\nthe Village Assembly to undertake audit of project investments and report to village assembly on a\nquarterly basis.\n\n\n70. A County Integrated Project Implementation Unit (CIPIU) will be established at each participating\ncounty headed by a County Project Coordinator and a County Project Representative on secondment and\nsupported by a procurement assistant, an accountant, safeguards specialists and a driver.\n\n\n71. A County Technical Committee (CTC) with representation from line Ministries and relevant county\ndepartments covering Water and Irrigation, Agriculture, Environment, Education, Health, Livestock,\nFisheries (where relevant) will be formed for the technical appraisal of the sub‐projects at the County\nlevel. Additionally, a County Steering Committee (CSC) will be established for the approval of annual work\nplan and budgets. The CSF will be chaired by County Secretary and will be represented by County Executive\nCommittee Member, Finance, UNHCR local representative, an Independent expert (as required), and\nrepresentative of the NPIU. The County Project Coordinator will be the Secretary for the CTC.\n\n\n72. At the national level, an NPIU headed by a dedicated Project Coordinator has been established in\nthe Department for Development of Arid and Semi‐Arid Regions, under the Executive Office of the\nPresident to provide oversight and promote coordination for the project. The NPIU will comprise sectoral\nexperts, procurement specialist, financial management specialist, social safeguards specialist,\nenvironmental safeguards specialist and monitoring and evaluation specialist to provide effective\nimplementation support and monitoring. The NPIU will provide oversight for social and environmental\nsafeguards. The NPIU will prepare consolidated annual work plans and budgets based on inputs received\nfrom the three participating CIPIUs. Finally, it will be responsible for coordinating with the World Bank\nand other key stakeholders and provide timely updates on project performance, funds utilization and\naudits.\n\n\nPage 33 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n73. A National Project Technical Committee (NTPC) will be established for review of annual work plan\nand mid‐year implementation progress. The NTPC will be represented by Principal Secretaries or their\nnominees from the Ministries of Water and Irrigation; Agriculture; Environment; Livestock; Fisheries;\nHealth and Social Protection, as well as representatives of County Executive Committee from Turkana,\nWajir and Garissa Counties. A National Project Steering Committee (NPSC) will be established for policy\ndecisions, broader project oversight and approval of annual work plans and budget. The NPSC will be\nChaired by the Chief of staff and Head of Public Service, Executive office of the President or his/her\nnominee; Governors of Turkana, Wajir and Garissa Counties or their nominees; representative from\nNational Treasury; an independent expert (as required); UNHCR Country representative; and the national\nproject coordinator will be the Member Secretary. The NPSC will approve annual work plans and budgets\nand ensure effective coordination between counties and different line Ministries of the National\nGovernment.\n\n\n74. The IGAD component will be implemented by the existing IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM\nestablished under DRDIP I (P152822). This grant became effective on July 20, 2016. The secretariat\noperates with a senior program coordinator, accountant, finance officer, and procurement officer;\nrecruitment for the M&E and knowledge expert and the Forced Displacement expert are both ongoing.\nFor the IGAD component, the Regional Secretariat on FDMM will undertake project management, day‐to‐\nday planning, implementation and supervision of project activities, administration of procurement and\nfinancial management (FM), and M&E. Under the IGAD grant, the Regional Secretariat on FDMM will\naugment capacity with the recruitment of a dedicated project officer for the expanded mandate as well\nas a GIS expert and a procurement assistant.\n\n\n**Table 4. Key Structures and their composition and role**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Structures|Composition|Key role|\n|---|---|---|\n|**National Level**|**National Level**|**National Level**|\n|National Project
Steering
Committee
|Chaired by the Chief of staff and Head of Public Service;
Executive office of the President or his/her nominee
Governors of Turkana, Wajir and Garissa Counties or
their nominees
Representative, National Treasury
UNHCR Country representative
National Project Coordinator as Member Secretary
The steering committee will co‐opt independent experts
based on the need.|Policy decisions, project oversight
and approval of annual work plan
and budget|\n|National Project
Technical
Committee
|
Principal Secretaries of the Ministries of Water and
Irrigation; Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries;
Education; Environment and Natural Resources;
Health and Social Protection; and Interior
Representative of County Executive Committee from
Turkana, Wajir and Garissa counties|Review of annual work plan and
mid‐year
implementation
progress|\n|National Project
Implementation
Unit
|Project coordinator
Core
Team
composed
of
sectoral
experts,
procurement
specialist,
financial
management
specialist,
Social
Safeguards
Specialist,
Environmental Safeguards Specialist, Monitoring and
Evaluation Specialist|Implementation
support
and
monitoring|\n\n\nPage 34 of 120\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|County Level|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|County Steering
Committee
|Chaired by County Secretary
Member of County Treasury
UNHCR representative
County Project coordinator as Secretary
Representative of the NPIU
Independent experts will be co‐opted based on the
need.|Approval of annual work plan and
budget|\n|County Technical
Committee|Representatives from line Ministries and departments of
Water
and
Irrigation,
Agriculture,
Environment,
Education, Health, Livestock, Fisheries (where relevant)|Appraisal of subprojects|\n|County
Integrated
Project
Implementation
Unit|
County Project coordinator (and M&E)
County Project Representative (seconded)
Procurement Assistant
Accountant
Safeguards specialist
Driver|Implementation
support
and
monitoring|\n|**Community Level**|**Community Level**|**Community Level**|\n|Ward
Level
Committee|Two representatives (one man and one woman) from
each Village Level Committee|Coordination and prioritization of
subproject for inclusion in work
plan at the Ward level|\n|Village
Level
Committee|Five‐member committee selected by the village assembly
including women, youth and the differently abled as
representatives|Coordinate village level plans|\n|Social
Audit
Committee|Five members selected by the Village Assembly
|Undertake
audit
of
project
investments and report to village
assembly on quarterly basis|\n\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n\n\n\n75. The proposed project will be implemented at the community level with necessary oversight and\ntechnical support at the national, subnational, and local levels. M&E capacities will be ensured at the\nnational, subnational, and local levels for the collection, organization, and analysis of project‐related data.\nThe main instrument for M&E under the project will be the Results Framework with indicators and the\nbaseline, intermediate, and end‐of‐project targets, which will be the basis for reporting progress. The\nindicators, data sources, and data collection methods take into account the CDD approach and the limited\ninstitutional capacities in the project targeted areas. All indicators are disaggregated by country, with\nfurther disaggregation by gender (percentage of female) for the core indicator on direct project\nbeneficiaries.\n\n\n76. Geospatial tools will be leveraged for implementation supervision, coordination with partners and\nM&E. A Geospatial Information System will be established, allowing for remote supervision of project\nimplementation progress, particularly in areas with physical access constraints. The locations of refugee\ncamps and host community locations, as well as existing service infrastructure, such as water points,\nschools, and health facilities, can be geotagged through simple GPS devices and smart phones. Once\nestablished, the geographic database will also allow for ongoing remote tracking of project activities as\nwell as their relation to contextual dynamics, including certain indicators for M&E purposes. Moreover,\n\n\nPage 35 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8871511816978455,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9111790657043457,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "subproject",
+ "confidence": 0.7117566466331482,
+ "start": 346,
+ "end": 347
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Results Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.7050365209579468,
+ "start": 534,
+ "end": 536
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator on direct project\nbeneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5087280869483948,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 613
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "remote supervision of project\nimplementation progress",
+ "confidence": 0.6526251435279846,
+ "start": 643,
+ "end": 649
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Geospatial Information System",
+ "confidence": 0.8579498529434204,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "remote supervision of project\nimplementation progress",
+ "confidence": 0.6379497051239014,
+ "start": 643,
+ "end": 649
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "geographic database",
+ "confidence": 0.8219188451766968,
+ "start": 701,
+ "end": 703
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "remote supervision of project\nimplementation progress",
+ "confidence": 0.5299469232559204,
+ "start": 643,
+ "end": 649
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nthe systematic recording and monitoring of the project’s geographic footprint will serve to facilitate the\ncoordination with development partners and to identify potential geographic overlaps with ongoing and\nproposed interventions by partners. In turn, the geographic database can feed into gap analyses and help\nto make sure that the project complements existing aid provision, including through the NEDI, in the most\nefficient way. The use of Geospatial Information System tools will also help to remotely monitor the\nactivities of third‐party agents (‘monitor the monitors’ approach). The generated geotagged data can be\nused for routine and ad hoc quality checks as part of implementation support provided by the task team.\nCollecting the respective geographic data will imply the need for some straightforward training and\ncapacity building with regard to using GPS devices and related tools to be provided to the NPIU and CIPIU,\nthird‐party monitors, and the IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM.\n\n\n**C. Sustainability**\n\n\n77. **Institutional sustainability.** The DRDIP II will be implemented through the existing institutions at\nthe county, subcounty, and ward levels, and the project will make investments to enhance the capacities\nof these entities for engaging communities, planning, and implementing local‐level infrastructure for\nservice delivery, environmental management, and promotion of livelihoods. The project will also\ncontribute to institutional sustainability by reinforcing coordination and collaboration across the national,\ncounty, and subcounty levels; rendering the county government planning and implementation process\nresponsive to community needs, thereby strengthening the social contract between citizens and the state;\nand ensuring linkages across various sectoral ministries or departments and development partners for\ngreater synergies. The national PIU will ensure linkages and synergies across various relevant institutions\nand agencies.\n\n\n78. **Sustainability of infrastructure.** The DRDIP II will support investments in social and economic\ninfrastructure to support service delivery and benefits to target communities. However, the project will\nonly invest in the expansion, upgrade, and/or establishment of infrastructure with close coordination with\nthe respective sectoral agencies to ensure that the recurring operation and maintenance costs are\nincluded in annual budgets, guaranteeing the sustainability of infrastructure investments. For example,\nclassroom construction will be supported when prioritized by communities, when student‐to‐classroom\nratios are above agreed‐on norms, when teachers and teaching material are assigned, and when the\neducation department can ensure that recurring costs are part of subsequent plans and budgets.\n\n\n79. **Economic sustainability.** The DRDIP II will support the livelihoods program to include traditional\nand non‐traditional livelihoods as well as other income‐generating activities. However, all investments\nwill be based on community‐identified priorities, technical feasibility, and market assessments to ensure\nthat the livelihoods being supported are viable and enhance incomes for target communities.\n\n\n**D. Role of Partners**\n\n\n80. Project preparation involved close collaboration with UNHCR alongside the GoK to design the\nappropriate responses to the social, economic, and environmental situation and impacts in the refugee‐\nhosting and receiving areas and to design a project appropriate to address these impacts. Project\npreparation has also involved intense consultations with all development partners active on forced\ndisplacement issues in Kenya and Somalia, and various NGOs working in the project target areas.\nImportantly, sustaining the close collaboration and coordination between UNHCR and the World Bank\n\n\nPage 36 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "geographic database",
+ "confidence": 0.9677582383155823,
+ "start": 63,
+ "end": 65
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9280297756195068,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Geospatial Information System",
+ "confidence": 0.5273197293281555,
+ "start": 97,
+ "end": 100
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "geographic data",
+ "confidence": 0.9304298758506775,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 153
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.8451422452926636,
+ "start": 212,
+ "end": 214
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.8299473524093628,
+ "start": 357,
+ "end": 359
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.7912232279777527,
+ "start": 489,
+ "end": 491
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "target communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7625430226325989,
+ "start": 545,
+ "end": 547
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nteams will be critical during the project implementation as UNHCR will be leading the process of return\nand reintegration process of Somali refugees, will continue to support refugees in Kakuma, and will\nundertake the screening of locals registered as refugees.\n\n\n81. The World Bank along with a range of development partners who are working on refugee issues\nin Kenya are coordinating closely with UNHCR on supporting refugees in the Kakuma and Dadaab refugee\ncamps, including the development of Kalobeyei, as a new integrated settlement in Kakuma. To ensure\ncoordinated support to UNHCR in the integrated social and economic development of Kalobeyei and in\nthe consolidation and closure of Dadaab refugee camp, some of development partners have shown keen\ninterest to support a World Bank‐administered MDTF for providing technical assistance to UNHCR. It is\nexpected that the MDTF will also support the World Bank team with additional resources for more\nintensive monitoring and supervision of the DRDIP II implementation, especially because a majority of the\nproject target areas face significant insecurity which challenges the World Bank teams’ mobility and\nsupervision in these areas.\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n**A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks**\n\n\n82. Overall, the risk rating for this proposed regional project is Substantial. The main identified risks\nwill be on (a) political and governance; (b) technical design; (c) institutional capacity; (d) fiduciary (e)\nenvironmental and social. However, tailored mitigation measures commensurate with the intensity with\nwhich the risks manifest themselves will be essential.\n\n\n - **Political and governance.** The HOA region has active conflicts that are contributing to generation of\nnew displacements. Of relevance is the South Sudan conflict with refugee movements to Uganda,\nKenya, and Ethiopia. Further, the uncertainty about peace returning to South Sudan will continue to\ncontribute to caseloads in Kakuma. In addition, with Somalia remaining insecure and currently under\ngrips of a drought, further displacement is possible.\n\n\nEntailed in the planned closure of the Dadaab camp is the proposal for expedited return of increased\nnumber of Somali refugees to Somalia governed by the Tripartite Agreement. However, this refugee\nreturn poses multiple risks in the context of the ongoing insecurity and poverty challenges in\nSomalia: risks that refugees may not be able to return to places of origin, may not be able to restore\nhouseholds and livelihoods, and may in turn become IDPs in Somalia—most likely in urban contexts.\nThis will place additional strain on already fragmented and strained service delivery and social\ncohesion in those urban settings. The greater risk is that Somali refugees may seek alternative\noptions such as movement within Kenya or elsewhere in the region, scenarios which are not yet\nsubject to response planning or policy dialogue and under which they may not receive sufficient\nsupport.\n\n\n - **Technical design.** The proposed project will be implemented in a complex operating environment\nwith security risks that limit effective direct supervision by the World Bank team and a multitude of\npublic, private, and NGO sector agencies in the humanitarian and development arena, at various\nlevels. Coordination across all these agencies is desirable to prevent duplication, establish synergies,\nand build on existing successful models including third‐party monitoring. Linkages with global and\n\n\nPage 37 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6350170373916626,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5752094388008118,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kakuma",
+ "confidence": 0.659191370010376,
+ "start": 54,
+ "end": 55
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.612544059753418,
+ "start": 45,
+ "end": 47
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MDTF",
+ "confidence": 0.7213031649589539,
+ "start": 158,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6346269249916077,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.5743767619132996,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "caseloads",
+ "confidence": 0.6530634760856628,
+ "start": 374,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6368926167488098,
+ "start": 417,
+ "end": 419
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tripartite Agreement",
+ "confidence": 0.7498345971107483,
+ "start": 424,
+ "end": 426
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.51954585313797,
+ "start": 382,
+ "end": 383
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8308308124542236,
+ "start": 417,
+ "end": 419
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "third‐party monitoring",
+ "confidence": 0.7591665983200073,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 631
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "global",
+ "confidence": 0.7877196669578552,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 635
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nregional initiatives will also be useful to bring in global knowledge on durable solutions for forced\ndisplacement. A robust mapping exercise has been undertaken as part of preparation process to\nmitigate inefficiencies and overlaps.\n\n\n - **Institutional capacity.** The administrative capacities of the county and subcounty governments in the\nproposed project areas are weak given the limited developmental interventions in these areas. It is\nproposed to bridge this through augmenting capacities for project implementation with recruitment\nof additional staff at different levels. The DRDIP II in Kenya will greatly benefit from the initiatives\nunder the Kenya Accountable Devolution Program and the technical assistance and capacity‐building\nmeasures being supported by the devolution MDTF. In particular, the capacity development in the\nareas of inclusion of disadvantaged groups, and gender sensitivity; enhancing capacity of counties to\nplan, monitor, budget, and engage citizens in the target counties; conflict sensitivity and resolution;\nand climate change will provide a robust platform for the implementation of the DRDIP II in Garissa,\nWajir, and Turkana Counties. The NEDI is expected to further enhance collaboration between key\nstakeholders.\n\n\n - **Safeguards.** Interventions under the proposed project are not expected to lead to large‐scale,\nsignificant, or irreversible environmental or social impacts. Safeguards instruments will be prepared\nto address the impacts. OP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment, OP/BP 4.11 on Physical Cultural\nResources, and OP/BP 7.50 on Projects on International Water Ways have been triggered. Further, OP\n4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement has been triggered and a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF)\nprepared. Land in the project area is communally owned and therefore land requirements will need\ncareful negotiation with clan/sub‐clan/sub‐sub‐clan leaders and interests of different groups will need\ngood understanding to prevent conflict. OP 4.10 on Indigenous People has been triggered and a social\nassessment (SA) prepared.\n\n\nAn important intervention under the proposed project is the rehabilitation of Kenyans currently\nregistered as refugees who have thus far benefited from food rations and social services compared to\nlocal host populations. Their rehabilitation either in communities of origin or other host communities\nand/or in situ in areas where the camp infrastructure is currently located, will need careful assessment\nof prevailing social dynamics that could range from stigma and hostility to acceptance. All efforts will\nbe made to ensure that social harmony and cohesion will be nurtured and maintained while\nrehabilitating Kenyans registered as refugees.\n\n\n83. The proposed project will also benefit from the devolution process that is under way in Kenya and\nendeavors to shift powers, responsibilities, and funds from the National Government to 47 elected county\ngovernments, which include the three counties affected by refugee presence. Technical assistance and\ncapacity‐building measures are being supported under the World Bank‐led devolution work focusing on\nfiscal impacts of devolution, public financial management and human resources, M&E, performance\nmonitoring systems and open data, social accountability, and devolved sector support. The proposed\nproject will potentially build on these efforts and where required contribute to a more responsive,\n‘bottom‐up’ form of Government, with greater role for communities in the planning and implementation\nof developmental interventions for ensuring equal access to basic services, functional infrastructure, and\na stabilized natural environment, in the three participating counties.\n\n\nPage 38 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n84. For Garissa and Wajir Counties, the DRDIP II will collaborate with FCDC which has mandate for\nfast tracking and steering the socioeconomic development in Mandera, Wajir, Garissa, Marsabit, Isiolo,\nTana River, and Lamu Counties. The World Bank is supporting institutional strengthening for the FCDC for\nsetting of strategic direction and coordinating strategic initiatives that will drive the regional\neconomic/developmental goals of its member counties. This support is in a context of serious capacity\nconstraints in these counties that is a contributing factor to the highest rates of poverty, vulnerability to\ndisasters, limited access to and use of basic services such as health and education, and low levels of\ninfrastructure and investment and will complement the devolution MDTF.\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A. Economic and Financial (if applicable) Analysis**\n\n\n85. The economic and financial analyses of the proposed project interventions show that the project\nis economically and financially feasible. As a CDD project, it is not possible to predetermine actual\ninvestments. Therefore, analyses were carried out based on a typology of the DRDIP II investments in\nKenya. These include a total of seven interventions across the three investment components of the\nproject. The projects’ incremental benefits relate to (a) financial savings derived from improved access to\nwater points, primary health care (reduction in health costs and lost time because of illnesses), and\neducation (capacity building and improved skills for livelihoods); (b) improvement of local flora and fauna\nbecause of a reforestation program and charcoal production from _Prosopis juliflora_ ; 12F [13] and (c) increased\nreturns from enhanced livestock with to productivity enhancement investments.\n\n\n86. **Rationale for public sector engagement.** The rationale for public sector engagement for the\nDRDIP II in Kenya is based on the role of the Government and local administration to promote economic\nand social goals and their spillover effects. Investments funded through the project aim at enhancing\naccess to basic services, especially the vulnerable groups, particularly women and children; expansion of\nboth business opportunities and improved infrastructure that could facilitate movement of products and\nservices along their value chain. Moreover, these interventions have positive externalities and important\nspillovers (details in Annex 5) that justify the key role of the Government. Additionally, the public sector\nis also targeted by the World Bank’s specific interventions to strengthen capacities, systems, and\nprocesses for effective and efficient delivery which also require sound coordination between local\nadministrations and the Central Government.\n\n\n87. **Value added of World Bank support.** The value added of the World Bank support to the project\ncomes from (a) critical technical contributions based on international experience on gender, health,\nenvironment, energy, livelihoods, and private sector development, among many others; and (b) its\nconvening power to support Kenya in addressing the impact of protracted refugee presence. In particular,\nthe World Bank’s global experience with CDD, gender, Natural Resource Management (NRM), and\nlivelihoods will enhance the effectiveness of the DRDIP II implementation in Kenya. These interventions\nwill be rigorously evaluated, in coordination with the Government and the FDMM Regional Secretariat to\nproduce regional and international evidence on successful and innovative interventions, based on lessons\n\n\n13 The invasive _Prosopis_ tree species, commonly known as ‘Mathenge’, can be found in most ASALs of Kenya. The _Prosopis_ weed\nproblem has had a dramatic impact on the environment and livelihoods of pastoral communities and borders on being\nconsidered a national disaster. Pastoralists inhabit most of the areas where _Prosopis_ occurs.\n\n\nPage 39 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nlearned and experience.\n\n\n88. While the economic analysis is based on these benefits, it must be noted that this is rather\nconservative as the returns from the DRDIP II investments are far larger and a significant portion of\nbenefits are not readily quantifiable. Net present values (NPVs) were calculated for proposed\ninterventions (Table 5) with benefits quantifiable in monetary terms, whereas others show several\nintangible, indirect benefits (details in Annex 5).\n\n\n**Table 5. Examples of Proposed Interventions, and Relative Cost and Benefits**\n\n\n\n|Project
Component|Proposed Interventions|Established
Cost (US$)|Net Present
Value (US$)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Construction of one borehole|9,750|75,986|\n|1|Construction of health facility|388,330|n.a.|\n|1|Construction of school building|195,484|n.a.|\n|2|Reforestation of 1 ha land|2,558|n.a.|\n|2|Construction of one_Prosopis_charcoal plant|114|2,267|\n|3|Livestock productivity improvement dairy only|510|2,359|\n|3|Livestock productivity improvement dairy and meat|14|1,402|\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n89. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effect on the internal rate of return (IRR) of\nvariations in benefits and costs in the realization of benefits. All results are apparently robust.\nNotwithstanding an increase in cost by 10 percent or a decrease in the total estimated benefits by 10\npercent, the results remain robust. Moreover, a third scenario that contemplates a 10 percent increase in\ncosts combined with a 10 percent decrease in benefits still shows robust IRR, considering a social discount\nrate of 3 percent according to World Bank guidelines (Table 6). In conclusion, the overall net discounted\nbenefits of the presented cost‐benefit analysis remain positive under any circumstances.\n\n\n**Table 6. Sensitivity Analysis**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Water (%)|Prosopis Charcoal
production (%)|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy Only (%)|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy and
Meat (%)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Base Scenario|183|440|114|2082|\n|Cost + 10% or Benefit − 10%|165|400|103|189|\n|Cost + 10% and Benefit −
10%|150|363|92|1720|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations based on cost‐benefit analysis simulations and estimated NPV of monetized benefits.\nSocial discount rate (SCD) of 3 percent in accordance with World Bank guidelines.\n\n\n**B. Technical**\n\n\n90. **Regional approach.** Forced displacement is a regional phenomenon in the HOA, with neighbors\nof conflict‐affected countries bearing a huge burden with regard to refugee movements. Impacts of the\nrefugee presence on host communities include increased pressure on scarce social services such as\neducation, health, and water; depletion of natural resources, such as forest and land degradation and loss\nof biomass; and competition for limited livelihood opportunities, such as income‐generating activities.\n\n\nPage 40 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nThe DRDIP II therefore supports interventions to mitigate the social, economic, and environmental\nimpacts through the investment components across the three project counties that host refugees. Specific\nactivities will be determined based on local circumstances, but the project offers a useful platform for\nlearning about approaches and intervention successes and contributing to the regional operation. The\nproject also supports robust knowledge generation, learning, and sharing at the regional level through the\nRegional Secretariat on FDMM to enhance efficiencies and the effectiveness of interventions across the\nparticipating project countries—Djibouti, Ethiopia, Uganda, and Kenya— and other IGAD Member States.\n\n\n91. **CDD approach.** The operational approach of CDD will be adopted for project implementation with\nthe required flexibility to respond to the scale and nature of community needs in the diverse local\nconditions of the project target areas. It will allow for devolving decision making to communities to ensure\nthat resource distribution is fair, supports priority local infrastructure and service delivery needs, and\nincentivizes collective action.\n\n\n92. **Strengthening local development.** The DRDIP II has made an informed choice of implementation\narrangements through existing government structures in the targeted areas which are underserved areas.\nCommunity‐responsive approaches will be strengthened into the local development processes of planning\nand budget development process. To mitigate risks of remoteness of areas and limited implementation\ncapacity, the project design will incorporate reliance on communities’ accountability mechanisms, civil\nsociety monitoring and advocacy, and strategic use of technology; tailor World Bank’s supervision with\nthird‐party monitoring; and strengthen communities’ institutions and county government capacity.\n\n\n**C. Financial Management**\n\n\n93. **Kenya.** The World Bank’s financial management team conducted a financial management\nassessment of the National Project Implementing Unit (NPIU) in the Department of Arid and Semi‐Arid\nRegions under the Executive Office of the President, Cabinet Affairs Department on 16 [th] February 2017.\nThis NPIU will be the coordinating unit in the implementation of the DRDIP II.\n\n\n94. The objective of the financial management assessment was to determine whether the\nimplementing entity financial arrangements (a) are capable of correctly and completely recording all\ntransactions and balances relating to the project; (b) facilitate the preparation of regular, accurate,\nreliable and timely financial statements; (c) safeguard the project’s entity assets; and (d) are subject to\nauditing arrangements acceptable to the World Bank. The assessment complied with the Financial\nManagement Manual for World Bank‐Financed Investment Operations that became effective on March\n1, 2010 (retrofitted on February 4, 2015).\n\n\n95. The assessment focused on planning and budgeting, accounting, internal control systems\nincluding internal audit, financial reporting both in‐year and annual, banking arrangements,\ndisbursements and funds flow, and external auditing. Given the complexity of the project (multi‐sectoral\ndesign) and given that the community around the Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps is not familiar with\ndevelopment aid after years of reliance on humanitarian aid, the FM risk is assessed as **High.**\n\n\n96. A Project implementation manual (PIM) that is acceptable to the Association will be prepared for\nKenya. The PIM will cover FM aspects related to the project that are not covered in the existing FM\nmanuals. Governance and anti‐corruption arrangements will also be designed for this project, including\n\n\nPage 41 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.688033401966095,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5114880800247192,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5574371814727783,
+ "start": 51,
+ "end": 52
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.6974567770957947,
+ "start": 222,
+ "end": 224
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6131523251533508,
+ "start": 334,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7404607534408569,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financial Management",
+ "confidence": 0.7030933499336243,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8232179284095764,
+ "start": 334,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5192971229553223,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management\nassessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9815878868103027,
+ "start": 348,
+ "end": 351
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.940433144569397,
+ "start": 334,
+ "end": 335
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7012513279914856,
+ "start": 387,
+ "end": 388
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.507081925868988,
+ "start": 519,
+ "end": 520
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5096669793128967,
+ "start": 481,
+ "end": 483
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7708753943443298,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 514
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project implementation manual",
+ "confidence": 0.679246723651886,
+ "start": 609,
+ "end": 612
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "FM aspects related to the project",
+ "confidence": 0.549320638179779,
+ "start": 631,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.7617063522338867,
+ "start": 613,
+ "end": 614
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8895671963691711,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 626
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.61684250831604,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 514
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nputting a complaints‐handling mechanism in place so that concerns raised by project beneficiaries can be\naddressed. Arrangements will be made for setting up community‐level SACs. Implementing entities will\nbe encouraged to post project budgets and audited financial statements on their websites to promote\ntransparency and accountability. Additional details on the assessment are included in Annex 3.\n\n\n97. **IGAD Regional Secretariat** . An FM assessment was conducted on the FM arrangements for this\nproject according to the FM manual issued in March 1, 2010, and reissued in February 2015. The\nassessment relied on FM assessment conducted for the existing IGAD implemented DRDIP, P152822, and\nlessons and experiences learned during implementation of this project. On the basis of the assessment,\nthe FM risk is maintained as Moderate.\n\n\n98. As noted above, this project’s Component 5 (IGAD component) will be implemented by the IGAD\nand its FDMM Regional Secretariat, which was established under the existing active grant to the IGAD\nunder DRDIP (P152822). It is envisaged that the same FM arrangements designed for this grant under\nP152822 will continue to be applicable in implementing Component 5 of this project. Policies and\nprocedures of the IGAD were considered to be adequate and will continue to be applicable for this project.\nIn addition, the existing DRDIP (P152822) developed a PIM, which will be applicable for this project as\nwell. There is adequate staffing at IGAD and its Regional Secretariat on FDMM, which will handle FM issues\nof this project.\n\n\n99. No funds will be transferred to any other implementing entity other than the IGAD Regional\nSecretariat on FDMM office. Disbursement arrangements envisaged under the existing IGAD DRDIP\nP152822 will continue to be applicable for this project as well. The IGAD Secretariat will open a Designated\nAccount in Djibouti at a commercial bank acceptable to IDA. The Designated Account will be denominated\nin U.S. dollars. The IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM will also open a project account denominated in\nlocal currency and USD to be opened at a commercial bank acceptable to IDA in Nairobi. The IGAD will\ncontinue to use the transaction‐based method of disbursements (Statements of Expenditure) for this\nproject. All disbursement methods will continue to be applicable. Details are stated in the disbursement\nletter and disbursement handbook.\n\n\n100. The IGAD Secretariat prepares and submits to IDA quarterly unaudited interim financial reports\n(IFRs) for the existing project—the DRDIP I (P152822)—within 45 days after the end of the quarter to\nwhich they relate. This existing IFR format will be used and will include the transactions of this project. Its\nform and content will be reviewed and revised and agreed with during this project negotiation.\n\n\n101. This project will be audited by to an external auditor acceptable to the World Bank with annual\naudit reports together with management letters to be submitted to the World Bank within six months of\nthe end of the fiscal year. Audit should be carried out in accordance with International Standards on\nAuditing. It is expected that this project audit will be coordinated with DRDIP I (P152822) project. Audit\nterms of reference were agreed. Audit reports will be publically disclosed by the World Bank in accordance\nwith the World Bank Access to Information Policy.\n\n\n102. Additional details of the assessments on both Kenya and the IGAD implemented components are\nincluded in Annex 3.\n\n\nPage 42 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9559840559959412,
+ "start": 99,
+ "end": 101
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD Regional Secretariat",
+ "confidence": 0.6643761992454529,
+ "start": 92,
+ "end": 95
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5387117266654968,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8815190196037292,
+ "start": 126,
+ "end": 127
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PIM",
+ "confidence": 0.6357031464576721,
+ "start": 274,
+ "end": 275
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Statements of Expenditure",
+ "confidence": 0.7940321564674377,
+ "start": 426,
+ "end": 429
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "transaction‐based method of disbursements",
+ "confidence": 0.8968806266784668,
+ "start": 419,
+ "end": 425
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.5713481307029724,
+ "start": 336,
+ "end": 337
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9034499526023865,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 614
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6217389702796936,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.9166414141654968,
+ "start": 642,
+ "end": 643
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**D. Procurement**\n\n\n103. **Kenya** . Procurement for the project will be carried out in accordance with the “The World Bank\nProcurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers, July 2016”, hereafter referred to as ‘Procurement\nRegulations’. The project will also be subject to the World Bank’s Anti‐corruption Guidelines, dated July\n1, 2016.\n\n\n104. The project largely follows the CDD approach and procurement by the communities will follow\nProcurement Regulations paragraph 6.52 and Annex XII ‐ Selection Methods paragraph 6.9 and 6.10. The\nprocurement arrangement at community level and oversight mechanism such as citizen engagement and\nsocial audit and accountability will be detailed in the Project Operations Manual and in line with ‘Guidance\nNote for Design and Management of Procurement Responsibilities in Community Driven Development\nProjects’, dated March 15, 2012. The procurement arrangement shall be simple to enable the\ncommunities to carry out their own procurement activities with little or no assistance from\nnational/county/sub‐county officials. The fiduciary assurance shall come from citizen engagement,\ndisclosure at community level, social audit, and use of women‐led procurement committees at community\nlevel.\n\n\n105. As required by the Procurement Regulations, a Project Procurement Strategy for Development\n(PPSD) has been developed on the basis of which the Procurement Plan has been prepared setting out\nthe selection methods to be followed by the Borrower during project implementation in the procurement\nof goods, works, and non‐consulting and consulting services financed by the World Bank. The PPSD and\nthe Procurement Plan are part of the project documents and are contained in the project files. The\nProcurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual project\nimplementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.\n\n\n106. A procurement capacity and risk assessment has been carried out by the World Bank to review\nthe organizational structure for implementing the project and the adequacy of procurement staff. The\nassessment has informed the preparation of the PPSD and has also been fed into the Procurement Risk\nAssessment and Management System (PRAMS).\n\n\n107. **At the IGAD,** procurement will be carried out by the IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM.\nOversight will be provided by the IGAD procurement unit based in Djibouti. The IGAD secretariat has\nexperience in implementing donor‐supported projects, including those financed by the World Bank.\n\n\n**E. Social (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n108. Among the key social issues for the project are: (a) the issues relating to OP 4.10 for the Somali\nand Turkana communities and in‐depth consultations to meet policy requirements; (b) low economic and\nsocial empowerment of women and of youth; (c) weak and/or weakened customary institutions; (d)\nconflict over natural resource use and livelihoods; and (e) Kenyans who are currently registered as\nrefugees in the Dadaab refugee camp who need to be rehabilitated following their screening in light of\nthe GoK decision to close the Dadaab refugee camp complex. An expanded SA was carried out for the\nproject to explore these aspects which informed the project design.\n\n\n109. **OP 4.10 ‐ Indigenous Peoples** . The population in Garissa County is 98 percent Somali, according\n\n\nPage 43 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nto the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP), but, internally, the Somalis identify themselves with\nclans, which is a key factor in development and in distribution of resources in the county, employment,\nand also leadership selection. The clans found in the county are Abudwaq, Aulihan, Abdalla, Muqabuul,\nQare, and Dogodia. The three main sub‐clans: Aulidan, Abudwaq, and Muqabuul are from the Ogaden\nsub‐clan and from discussions in the field, there seem to be very little tension between them (other than\nduring elections). There are a few Bantu (Munyoyaya and Malakote) along the Tana River in Fafi\nsubcounty. Although Somalis are listed as an indigenous peoples group by the World Bank, the criteria of\nOP 4.10 were used to define Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups (VMGs) who fit the OP 4.10 criteria and\nthe GoK’s definition of marginalized communities. It is likely that remote mobile pastoralists will fit the\ncriteria of OP 4.10 and any riverine Bantu groups (if they exist in the target area). There are Boni hunter\ngathers in Ijara but they are unlikely to be affected by the project. Accordingly, the issues relating to OP\n4.10 are defined in detail in the SA and the Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups Framework (VMGF);\nthrough in‐depth consultation to reflect the policy requirements. The SA and VMGF were prepared,\nconsulted, finalized and disclosed on March 3, 2017.\n\n\n110. Around Kakuma, the host community is mainly Turkana with a few other groups that came to do\nbusiness there and look for jobs. There is some intermarriage between these groups and also between\nthe host community and refugees with very little tension between them. There has, however, been\ntension in the past between nomadic pastoralist groups over natural resources. The determination of\nwhether the Turkana or the various sub‐clans fit the OP 4.10 criteria and the GoK’s definition of\nmarginalized communities was explored during the SA.\n\n\n111. **OP 4.12 ‐ Involuntary Resettlement.** The proposed project does not intend to undertake any\nsubprojects that will displace people. However, individual subprojects are not yet identified. Therefore,\nas a precautionary measure, the project prepared, consulted and disclosed a Resettlement Policy\nFramework (RPF) on March 3, 2017, prior to appraisal. The RPF addresses any issues which might arise\nfrom economic displacement and/or restriction of access to communal natural resources under the\nproject. During implementation, special attention will be given to community participation, grievance\nredress and benefit‐sharing mechanisms, and sociocultural systems/physical characteristics that are\nspecific to the project sites and surroundings to ensure that those affected by implementation of the\nproject, positively or negatively, have a voice and a mechanism for influencing project outcomes in line\nwith the World Bank’s safeguard policies.\n\n\n**F. Environment (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n112. The proposed project was screened by the World Bank Team and assigned the Environment\nAssessment category B. This is on the assumption that no major civil works will be funded and no major\nphysical or economic displacements will take place. The World Bank Operational Policy on Environmental\nAssessment (OP/BP 4.01) has been triggered, given that implementation of the activities outlined under\nComponents 1‐3 namely expansion and improvement of service delivery, including small‐scale\ninfrastructure; construction or rehabilitation of physical structures for soils and water conservation, and\nwater catchment management; other landscape restorative activities such as afforestation/reforestation,\neradication of noxious plant species; land‐based livelihood support activities; etc.; could result in\nenvironmental risks and social impacts, albeit these may be reversible, localized, and easily and cost‐\neffectively mitigated. The Operational Policy on Pest Management (OP/BP 4.09) has been triggered,\n\n\nPage 44 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "County Integrated Development Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.9046136140823364,
+ "start": 26,
+ "end": 30
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6156079769134521,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7931060194969177,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somalis",
+ "confidence": 0.9515721201896667,
+ "start": 39,
+ "end": 40
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "OP 4.10",
+ "confidence": 0.9190329909324646,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "GoK",
+ "confidence": 0.7605145573616028,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7604687809944153,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 304
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups",
+ "confidence": 0.5016900897026062,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 178
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Resettlement Policy\nFramework",
+ "confidence": 0.7934063076972961,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 462
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.9337614178657532,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 304
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Turkana",
+ "confidence": 0.5234668254852295,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environment\nAssessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5300542116165161,
+ "start": 597,
+ "end": 599
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.7467873096466064,
+ "start": 564,
+ "end": 566
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "World Bank Operational Policy on Environmental\nAssessment",
+ "confidence": 0.7957100868225098,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.7867236733436584,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 629
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Operational Policy on Pest Management",
+ "confidence": 0.8244516849517822,
+ "start": 741,
+ "end": 746
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\npredicated on the assumption that the project will support activities under Component 2 and 3 that are\nlikely to be agriculture‐based and that may increase the application of agrochemicals (insecticides,\nherbicides, fungicides and fertilizers).\n\n\n113. The Policy on Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) has been triggered as a precautionary\nmeasure. Although the project has no foreknowledge of any potential cultural and historical sites or\nresources of significance, it has incorporated “Chance Find” provisions in the Environmental and Social\nManagement Framework (ESMF) to ensure that the appropriate preventive and mitigation measures are\nformulated and executed in the event that any such physical cultural resources are encountered during\nproject implementation. In addition, the Policy on Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) has been triggered under\nthe assumption that Component 2 may support small dam construction as part of the small‐and micro‐\nscale irrigation schemes. To respond to requirements under this Policy, the project will use the 2010 FAO\n“Manual on Small Earth Dams, A Guide to Siting, Design and Construction”. Given that specific sites for\nsub‐projects to be implemented through a CDD approach are not yet known/identified, a framework\napproach was proposed by the World Bank Safeguard Team, and the Borrower has prepared an ESMF.\nThe Borrower has ensured that free, prior and informed consultations took place during the preparation\nof the safeguard instruments, and documentation of the stakeholder consultation and participation\nprocess is important during implementation. The ESMF was cleared by the World Bank and disclosed in‐\ncountry and at the World Bank’s InfoShop on March 3, 2017.\n\n\n114. The Operational Policy on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) has been triggered because the\nproject will finance boreholes for drinking water supply for humans and livestock most likely to be located\nin international waterways of the Merti Aquifer. The community has also requested for and small‐scale\nirrigation investments. While the impact of these investments on the Merti Aquifer is likely to be\ninsignificant and the cumulative abstraction minor, however decisions related to small‐scale irrigation\ninvestment will be based on the detailed Merti Aquifer study which is ongoing. The riparian country of\nSomalia was notified in accordance with OP 7.50 on International Waterways on January 23, 2017. A\nresults memo was approved by the Regional Vice President on March 13, 2017.\n\n\n115. With respect to the IDA regional grant to the IGAD, the Environmental Assessment Category is C,\nas the activities being supported relate to coordination and capacity building and will not trigger any\nsafeguard policies.\n\n\n116. **Climate change and disaster risk screening.** The screening revealed that the project target areas\nare exposed to high temperatures, droughts, and/or floods because of intense rainfall during the main\nrainy season, which spans July to October. Overall, the proposed project will contribute to reducing\ngreenhouse gas emissions through Component 2: Sustainable Environmental Management by supporting\n(a) measures on improved energy efficiency in cooking and lighting and increasing the use of renewable\nenergy sources reducing pressure on biomass; and (b) soil and water conservation measures,\nafforestation, and area closures for regeneration that will contribute to reducing the impacts of climate\ntrends by improving water conservation, increased biomass, and fodder availability. However, it is worth\nnoting that project‐supported activities under Component 1: Social and Economic Services and\nInfrastructure, such as roads, are likely to be affected by climate trends. Also, investments under\nComponent 3: Livelihoods Program which will support agriculture and livestock‐related livelihoods are\nlikely to be affected by climate trends.\n\n\nPage 45 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n117. **Greenhouse gas accounting.** The proposed project investments have been assessed to have\nnegligible emissions from the planned solid waste management activities. There are no major\ninfrastructure investments related to solid waste but rather development of a solid waste management\nplan, recycling of plastics, and strategic clean‐ups. Per corporate guidance, it was determined that there\nis no need for reporting the greenhouse gas emissions impact of the planned solid waste activities.\n\n\n**H. World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n118. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a World Bank (WB)\nsupported project may submit complaints to existing project‐level grievance redress mechanisms or the\nWB’s Grievance Redress Service (GRS). The GRS ensures that complaints received are promptly reviewed\nin order to address project‐related concerns. Project affected communities and individuals may submit\ntheir complaint to the WB’s independent Inspection Panel which determines whether harm occurred, or\ncould occur, as a result of WB non‐compliance with its policies and procedures. Complaints may be\nsubmitted at any time after concerns have been brought directly to the World Bank's attention, and Bank\nManagement has been given an opportunity to respond. For information on how to submit complaints to\nthe World Bank’s corporate Grievance Redress Service (GRS), please visit\nhttp://www.worldbank.org/en/projects‐operations/products‐and‐services/grievance‐redress‐service.\nFor information on how to submit complaints to the World Bank Inspection Panel, please visit\nwww.inspectionpanel.org.\n\n\nPage 46 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "solid waste management\nplan",
+ "confidence": 0.7962935566902161,
+ "start": 68,
+ "end": 72
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6431605815887451,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Grievance Redress Service",
+ "confidence": 0.5708542466163635,
+ "start": 156,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Project affected communities and individuals",
+ "confidence": 0.5731267333030701,
+ "start": 181,
+ "end": 186
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Beneficiaries with
access to social and
economic services and
infrastructure||Number|0.00|1500000.0
0|Yearly
|beneficiary assessment;
progress reports
|PIU
|\n|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|
Description:This indicator will assess the number of beneficiaries that are benefiting from the new infrastructures and economic services being provided by the project,
including host community and refugee beneficiaries|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Name: Direct project
beneficiaries|✔|Number|0.00|1041436.0
0|Yearly|beneficiary assessments;
progress reports|PIU|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||Female beneficiaries|✔|Percentage|0.00|50.00|||||\n\n\n\nPage 47 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9757825136184692,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7292898297309875,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host community and refugee beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7854647636413574,
+ "start": 198,
+ "end": 203
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7822943329811096,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6374019980430603,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 328
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "host community and refugee beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7507409453392029,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9119751453399658,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 509
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Female beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5318547487258911,
+ "start": 563,
+ "end": 565
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.7404891848564148,
+ "start": 513,
+ "end": 515
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Female beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7290536165237427,
+ "start": 563,
+ "end": 565
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.|
Description:Direct beneficiaries are people or groups who directly derive benefits from an intervention (i.e., children who benefit from an immunization program;
families that have a new piped water connection). Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information. Supplemental Value: Female beneficiaries
(percentage). Based on the assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries, specify what proportion of the direct project beneficiaries are female. This indicator
is calculated as a percentage.||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Name: Beneficiaries of
economic development
activities that report an
increase in income|Col3|Number|0.00|48000.00|Yearly, MTR and EOP|HH surveys; evaluation;
beneficiary assessments;
progress reports|PIU|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|
Description:This will assess how the beneficiaries are economically faring after the project support is provided.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Name: Land area where
sustainable land
management practices have
been adopted as a result of
the project|Col3|Hectare(Ha)|0.00|11190.00|Yearly|Progress reports|PIU|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|
Description:This will assess the increased hectare developed for sustainable land management practices|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 48 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Indicator Name",
+ "confidence": 0.5814089775085449,
+ "start": 25,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5921633243560791,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9630057215690613,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Female beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5087876319885254,
+ "start": 157,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment and definition of direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8195450305938721,
+ "start": 169,
+ "end": 176
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6109951734542847,
+ "start": 189,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.709394633769989,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 176
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.8464834690093994,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.5612667202949524,
+ "start": 355,
+ "end": 356
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9422726631164551,
+ "start": 388,
+ "end": 391
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6704259514808655,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6293318271636963,
+ "start": 458,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.593421220779419,
+ "start": 482,
+ "end": 485
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7392224073410034,
+ "start": 601,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8306109309196472,
+ "start": 697,
+ "end": 700
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6509400010108948,
+ "start": 767,
+ "end": 768
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.5737239122390747,
+ "start": 767,
+ "end": 768
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "direct project beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.6696733236312866,
+ "start": 800,
+ "end": 803
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Yearly, MTR and EOP",
+ "confidence": 0.6799339652061462,
+ "start": 960,
+ "end": 965
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8907143473625183,
+ "start": 905,
+ "end": 906
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.6482425928115845,
+ "start": 974,
+ "end": 976
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8885684609413147,
+ "start": 905,
+ "end": 906
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9690458178520203,
+ "start": 1279,
+ "end": 1281
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Land area",
+ "confidence": 0.8347756862640381,
+ "start": 1233,
+ "end": 1235
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.768340528011322,
+ "start": 1216,
+ "end": 1217
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|
Description:The capacity and assessment plan and the progress reports will provide detailed information on the expanded activities of the Secretariat, including learning
activities (research, studies and annual regional learning and exchange workshop), technical assistance provided to the countries, and monitoring activities.|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Community‐based
organizations formed or
reinforced and still
operational one year after
receiving funding||Number|0.00|2700.00|Annually after first year
|Progress reports
|PIU
|\n|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|
Description:This will determine the number of community‐based organizations created or reinforced that remain operational.|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Beneficiaries that feel
project investments
reflected their needs
(percentage)
|✔|Percentage|0.00|70.00|Annually after first year
|beneficiary assessments
|PIU
|\n|
Beneficiaries that feel
project inv. reflected their
needs ‐ female (number)|✔|Number|0.00|364000.00||||\n|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|
Description:This will measure the extent to which decisions about the project reflected community preferences in a consistent manner.|\n\n\n\nPage 49 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6997050046920776,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8980295658111572,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "countries",
+ "confidence": 0.6389895677566528,
+ "start": 144,
+ "end": 145
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9273129105567932,
+ "start": 106,
+ "end": 108
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "countries",
+ "confidence": 0.517729640007019,
+ "start": 144,
+ "end": 145
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "capacity and assessment plan",
+ "confidence": 0.5035595893859863,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 164
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "capacity and assessment plan",
+ "confidence": 0.5578272342681885,
+ "start": 340,
+ "end": 344
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9489433765411377,
+ "start": 346,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "capacity and assessment plan",
+ "confidence": 0.5027481317520142,
+ "start": 460,
+ "end": 464
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9256315231323242,
+ "start": 691,
+ "end": 693
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "community‐based organizations",
+ "confidence": 0.9639875292778015,
+ "start": 714,
+ "end": 718
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.8438928723335266,
+ "start": 947,
+ "end": 949
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "first year",
+ "confidence": 0.6435083150863647,
+ "start": 941,
+ "end": 943
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.6759247779846191,
+ "start": 903,
+ "end": 904
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Infrastructure
investments for which local
governments adopt
recurrent budget allocations
and/or operation and
maintenance plans||Percentage|0.00|70.00|Annually, beginning in
second year
|Progress report, evaluation
|PIU
|\n|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|
Description:This will assess the appropriation of new infrastructure investments made by the local government.|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Beneficiaries with
access to improved energy
sources||Number|0.00|300000.00|Annually, after second
year
|evaluation; beneficiary
assessment
|PIU
|\n|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries accessing an improved source of energy, such as cooking devices and renewable energy. A lot of the beneficiaries
for this indicator will come from users of public facilities such as schools or health centers|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Area provided with
irrigation and drainage
services (ha)
|✔|Hectare(Ha)|0.00|1000.00|Annually, after second
year
|Progress report, evaluation
|PIU
|\n|
Area provided with
irrigation and drainage
services ‐ New (ha)|✔|Hectare(Ha)|0.00|700.00||||\n|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|\n|
Area provided with
irrigation and drainage|✔|Hectare(Ha)|0.00|300.00||||\n\n\n\nPage 50 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6094549298286438,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9398586750030518,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "second year",
+ "confidence": 0.5849581360816956,
+ "start": 157,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.7488758563995361,
+ "start": 163,
+ "end": 165
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5789487361907959,
+ "start": 164,
+ "end": 165
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "PIU",
+ "confidence": 0.8639594316482544,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "second year",
+ "confidence": 0.7326129674911499,
+ "start": 157,
+ "end": 159
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9694938063621521,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9041240811347961,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 609
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.5533627271652222,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 609
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "users of public facilities",
+ "confidence": 0.6223188638687134,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 616
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7952587008476257,
+ "start": 764,
+ "end": 765
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "users of public facilities",
+ "confidence": 0.5397390127182007,
+ "start": 768,
+ "end": 772
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|services ‐ Improved (ha)|||||||||\n|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|
Description:This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new
irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Project Financed
subprojects that are
functioning or delivering
services to communities six
months after completion|Col2|Percentage|0.00|80.00|Annually, after second
year|Evaluation; Beneficiary
assessments|PIU|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|
Description:This will assess the performance of the subproject financed by the project|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Beneficiaries of
livelihood‐support activities|Col2|Number|0.00|80000.00|Annually, after second
year|Progress reports,
Beneficiary assessments|PIU|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|
Description:This will assess the number of beneficiaries that benefited from the project’s livelihood activities|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Name: Work days created
for short‐term employment
in the subprojects|Col2|Number|0.00|3600000.0
0|Annually, after second
year|evaluation of progress
report|PIU|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|
Description:This will assess the total number of work days created in all subprojects.|\n\n\n\nPage 51 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Indicator Name",
+ "confidence": 0.576033890247345,
+ "start": 25,
+ "end": 27
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5543463230133057,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9650490880012512,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.9143071174621582,
+ "start": 188,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.8580854535102844,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 321
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.935505747795105,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 453
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.6956513524055481,
+ "start": 650,
+ "end": 651
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6369446516036987,
+ "start": 729,
+ "end": 730
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.6727965474128723,
+ "start": 981,
+ "end": 983
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8998327255249023,
+ "start": 950,
+ "end": 951
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Work days created",
+ "confidence": 0.772718071937561,
+ "start": 1205,
+ "end": 1208
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Meeting of the
project’s regional steering
committee, knowledge
sharing, and learning
workshop organized
annually by the Regional
Secretariat, reflecting the
expanded mandate.||Number|0.00|5.00|Annually, after second
year
|Qualitative evaluation
report of local and regional
governments
|IGAD
|\n|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|
Description:This will assess whether or not the regional activities of the Regional Secretariat’s expanded mandate have
been endorsed and validated by IGAD’s member states|\n\n\n\nPage 52 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5935878753662109,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9335306286811829,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Beneficiaries with access to social and
economic services and infrastructure|0.00|150000.00|600000.00|1125000.00|1500000.00|1500000.00|1500000.00|\n|Direct project beneficiaries|0.00|104000.00|416000.00|780000.00|1040000.00|1040000.00|1041436.00|\n|Female beneficiaries|0.00|40.00|45.00|50.00|50.00|50.00|50.00|\n|Beneficiaries of economic development
activities that report an increase in
income|0.00|0.00|14000.00|32450.00|48000.00|48000.00|48000.00|\n|Land area where sustainable land
management practices have been
adopted as a result of the project|0.00|1100.00|4500.00|8500.00|11190.00|11190.00|11190.00|\n|Regional Secretariat’s capacity
assessment plan and annual progress
reports reflecting the expanded mandate
endorsed by participating countries|0.00|1.00|2.00|3.00|4.00|5.00|5.00|\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Community‐based organizations formed|0.00|0.00|250.00|850.00|1900.00|2700.00|2700.00|\n\n\nPage 53 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|or reinforced and still operational one
year after receiving funding||||||||\n|Beneficiaries that feel project investments
reflected their needs (percentage)|0.00|50.00|55.00|60.00|70.00|70.00|70.00|\n|Beneficiaries that feel project inv.
reflected their needs ‐ female (number)|0.00|26000.00|114400.00|234000.00|364000.00|364000.00|364000.00|\n|Infrastructure investments for which local
governments adopt recurrent budget
allocations and/or operation and
maintenance plans|0.00|60.00|60.00|70.00|70.00|70.00|70.00|\n|Beneficiaries with access to improved
energy sources|0.00|30000.00|120000.00|225000.00|300000.00|300000.00|300000.00|\n|Area provided with irrigation and
drainage services (ha)|0.00|100.00|400.00|750.00|1000.00|1000.00|1000.00|\n|Area provided with irrigation and
drainage services ‐ New (ha)|0.00|70.00|280.00|525.00|700.00|700.00|700.00|\n|Area provided with irrigation and
drainage services ‐ Improved (ha)|0.00|30.00|120.00|225.00|300.00|300.00|300.00|\n|Project Financed subprojects that are
functioning or delivering services to
communities six months after completion|0.00|0.00|60.00|65.00|70.00|80.00|80.00|\n|Beneficiaries of livelihood‐support|0.00|9000.00|28000.00|59000.00|80000.00|80000.00|80000.00|\n\n\nPage 54 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|YR2|YR3|YR4|YR5|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|activities||||||||\n|Work days created for short‐term
employment in the subprojects|0.00|360000.00|1440000.00|2700000.00|3600000.00|3600000.00|3600000.00|\n|Meeting of the project’s regional steering
committee, knowledge sharing, and
learning workshop organized annually by
the Regional Secretariat, reflecting the
expanded mandate.|0.00|1.00|2.00|3.00|4.00|5.00|5.00|\n\n\nPage 55 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: FORCED DISPLACEMENT CONTEXT IN KENYA**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n**Regional Context**\n\n\n1. The HOA region covers Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, and\nUganda. Despite its rich endowment in human, social, and natural capital, the HOA region is plagued by a\ncomplex history of capacity constraints, pockets of poverty and insecurity, increasing environmental\ndegradation, and a range of persistent development challenges. Conflict remains endemic in the region.\nThe complex cultural, social, and political nature of these conflicts gets further compounded by\ndemographic shifts because of population growth; the movement of people; imbalanced service\nprovision; increasing contestation over scarce natural resources; and harsh climatic conditions, including\nfrequent droughts and floods.\n\n\n2. Displacement has emerged as a regional phenomenon with spillover effects in countries directly\nneighboring those experiencing conflict and posing major challenges in reducing poverty and achieving\nsustainable development with peace and security in the HOA. Figure 1.1 provides an overview of active\ndisplacement sites in the HOA as of December 2016. The region hosts over 9.5 million displaced persons,\nincluding over 6.5 million IDPs and about 3 million refugees, as of June 2015. Displacement in the HOA\nhas been compounded by migration within and outside the region, driven by a number of natural and\nman‐made reasons, including climate change and environmental degradation, which have acted as threat\nmultipliers. 13F [14]\n\n\n**Figure 1.1. Displacement Overview in the HOA**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016.\n\n\n14 “Accelerating Climate‐Resilient and Low‐Carbon Development: The Africa Climate Business Plan.” Africa Region, World Bank\nGroup, Washington, DC.\n\n\nPage 56 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n3. The proposed project will be implemented in Kenya covering three refugee‐hosting counties\nnamely Garissa, Turkana, and Wajir. These areas face significant development deficits, which have been\nfurther exacerbated by the protracted displacement of refugees as reflected in the competition for\nservices; livelihoods; and natural resources, especially water and biomass. Because of the insufficient\nattention that has been paid to the development dimensions of protracted displacement situations, the\nnegative impacts of displacement on host communities have not been adequately addressed. The\nproposed project will adopt a holistic and comprehensive area‐based development approach to improve\nservice delivery, address environmental degradation, and provide livelihood opportunities to the host\ncommunities. These efforts are expected to benefit refugees as well, contributing to the design of\ntransitional or progressive solutions for them in a more conducive and opportunistic social and economic\necosystem. Additionally, the investments will contribute to mitigate conflict caused by the increased\ncompetition for services, livelihoods, and natural resources; increase social cohesion; and support better\nintegration between the economies of the refugees and the host communities.\n\n\n**Kenyan Context**\n\n\n4. As of December 2016, 14F [15] Kenya hosted the third largest number of refugees in Africa after Ethiopia\nand Uganda. Some 494,863 refugees and asylum seekers from Somalia, South Sudan, Ethiopia, and other\ncountries in the region are hosted in Kenya with 272,764 in the Dadaab refugee camps; 154,947 in\nKakuma; and 69,261 in Nairobi. These figures include 326,562 Somali refugees in protracted displacement,\n27,237 Ethiopians, 29,317 Congolese, and 88,391 South Sudanese refugees. Somali refugees are mainly\nlocated in the Dadaab camp while South Sudanese are largely in Kakuma. The Dadaab Refugee Complex\nhosts refugees in five camps—Dagahaley, Ifo, Ifo 2, Hagadera, and Kambioos; the first three are located\nin Lagdera (Dadaab) subcounty and the latter two are in Fafi subcounty. It is estimated that about 45,000\nare double registrations—15,000 Kenyans who enrolled as refugees to access food benefits and basic\nservices; 20,000 Somali refugees with Kenyan Identity cards; and nearly, 10,000 belonging to families of\nrefugee‐Kenyan marriages (UNHCR 2016). The Kakuma refugees are in four camps Kakuma I–IV and the\nKalobeyei settlement—all in Turkana West subcounty of the Turkana County.\n\n\n**Legal and Institutional Framework Governing Forced Displacement in Kenya**\n\n\n5. As is the case in other countries in the HOA, a range of international, regional, and domestic laws,\npolicies, and institutions govern the situation of refugees and IDPs in Kenya. Kenya adopted 15F [16] the three\nmajor international and regional legal instruments governing the situation of refugees in the HOA: (a) the\n1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 Convention) on May 16, 1966\nwith a reservation on Article 22 (1) dealing with the provision of public education to refugees; (b) the 1969\nOrganization of African Unity Convention Governing Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (1969\nOrganization of African Unity Convention) on November 11, 1981; and (c) the International Conference\non the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR) Protocol on the Property Rights of Returning Persons (the ICGLR\nProperty Protocol 2006) on June 23, 1992.\n\n\n6. The development‐related provisions of the international and domestic refugee laws deal with\nproperty rights, freedom of movement, the right to work, and access to services. The 1951 Convention\n\n\n15 UNHCR Factsheet December 2016.\n16 “Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa.” World Bank, Washington, DC.\n\n\nPage 57 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.9043612480163574,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5528659224510193,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.8042744994163513,
+ "start": 65,
+ "end": 66
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "double registrations",
+ "confidence": 0.5238314867019653,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 404
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNHCR",
+ "confidence": 0.8747475743293762,
+ "start": 446,
+ "end": 447
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8837313055992126,
+ "start": 447,
+ "end": 448
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somali refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.809739887714386,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 312
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "international and domestic refugee laws",
+ "confidence": 0.5005408525466919,
+ "start": 669,
+ "end": 674
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6066097021102905,
+ "start": 711,
+ "end": 714
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2006",
+ "confidence": 0.5003077387809753,
+ "start": 652,
+ "end": 653
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nhas provisions dealing with these issues. In addition, the ICGLR Property Protocol deals with the recovery\nof refugees’ property and possessions left behind or dispossessed during displacement. Domestic laws\nhave taken different approaches to address development‐related issues. Kenya’s Refugee Act 2006 makes\na provision for property rights in Article 16 (1), freedom of movement in Article 16 (2), and right to work\nin Article 16 (4), with no provision for services to refugees. However, this Kenyan Domestic Refugee Law\neffectively limits the refugees’ right to work by imposing the same restrictions and conditions applicable\nto aliens.\n\n\n**Figure 1.2. Displacement Situation in Kenya**\n\n\n_Source:_ UNHCR 2016\n\n\n7. The refugee policy and legal and institutional framework in Kenya offers refugees’ protection and\nnon‐refoulement. 16F [17] Kenya’s Refugee Act 2006 does not provide a path for a refugee to acquire citizenship\n\n\n17 The right not to be forcefully returned to the place from which they escaped.\n\n\nPage 58 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nand does not allow local integration of refugees. Lack of consistent decisions on issues related to refugees\nalso remains a challenge. In light of this, the main focus of this project is to contribute to improving service\ndelivery, addressing environmental degradation, and providing livelihood opportunities in the refugee‐\nhosting areas. The holistic approach of the project will also benefit refugees from investments in social\ninfrastructure, environmental amelioration, and livelihood opportunities. These investments will\ncontribute to better integration between refugee and host community economies—a transitional solution\nto refugee displacement while durable solutions are found.\n\n\n8. At the international and regional level, four legal instruments deal with IDPs in the HOA. These\ninclude (a) UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (the Guiding Principles); (b) the ICGLR Protocol\non the Protection and Assistance to Internally Displaced Persons (ICGLR IDP Protocol 2006); (c) the ICGLR\nProtocol on the Property Rights of Returning Persons (the ICGLR Property Protocol 2006); and (e) the\nAfrican Union Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons in Africa\n(Kampala Convention 2009). Kenya is a member of the ICGLR IDP and ICGLR Property Protocols. Kenya’s\nIDP legislation—the Prevention, Protection, and Assistance to Internally Displaced Persons and Affected\nCommunities Act 2012—confirms the application of the ICGLR IDP Protocol and UN Guiding Principles to\nIDPs in the country. It has provisions under Article 9 for property rights, freedom of movement, access to\nlivelihoods, and provision of services.\n\n\nPage 59 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The DRDIP II is being processed as part of the regional operation that seeks to address the impacts\nof forced displacement on countries and communities in the HOA that are hosting refugees. It is a\nmultisectoral development response by the GoK which addresses unmet social, economic, and\nenvironmental needs in local host communities in the three refugee‐hosting counties. The proposed\nproject will use an IPF instrument with total IDA funds of US$103 million equivalent to be disbursed as\ncredit at US$100 million equivalent for Kenya and a US$3 million equivalent grant to the IGAD.\n\n\n2. The DRDIP II seeks to address the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the presence\nof refugees in host communities through interlinked technical and investment components as described\nin the following paragraphs.\n\n\n**Component 1: Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services (approximately US$45 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n3. This component will specifically support improvements in access to basic services for the host\ncommunities. The key services will include basic education, primary and secondary health services, water\nsupply, sanitation and hygiene, and some productive economic infrastructure. The guiding principles will\nbe (a) prioritization based on identified community needs, especially by girls and women; (b) inputs\ncomplementary to ongoing support from the county and national governments as well as other\ndevelopment partners and CSOs; (c) compliance with quality standards and norms of the GoK; and (d)\nstrong accountability to citizens and credible systems for M&E of performance of such improved service\ncoverage.\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 1(a): Community Investment Fund (approximately US$42.5 million equivalent)**_\n\n\n4. This subcomponent seeks to improve community access to basic social services and economic\ninfrastructure by providing investment funds that, together with community contributions, will expand\nand improve service delivery and build economic infrastructure for local development. Investments will\nbe identified, prioritized, implemented, and monitored by beneficiary communities. The subcomponent\nwill respond to some key concerns that were identified during the SA with respect to basic social services\nas detailed in Table 2.1.\n\n\n5. The host communities use both county government and UNHCR‐provided social services.\nCommunity needs will be addressed by also rationalizing the delivery of health and education services\nthat UNHCR and its partners are providing to prevent duplication. Such rationalization, however, will be\nguided by community identified needs, facility norms established by the GoK, linkage with the CIDP and\nviable recurring costs for the county. New approaches for socially appropriate, cost‐effective, and\neffective service delivery options that are suitable to local conditions will be explored. One such example\nincludes expanding the ongoing GoK initiative to promote universal health coverage through appropriate\nsubsidies for the most vulnerable populations.\n\n\nPage 60 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n6. For improving access to safe water and sanitation, the project will complement inputs from the\nKenya Water and Sanitation Development Project (WSDP) (P156634) to expand water supply and\nsanitation services for the host populations in the project subcounties. Specific inputs in Garissa and Wajir\nCounties will be informed by the ongoing studies of Merti aquifer which is being used by refugees in\nDadaab and host communities and their livestock. For Garissa and Wajir counties, WSDP will take the lead\non water development activities with coordination on community‐demand generated under DRDIP II at\nthe subcounty and county levels. Specifically, the project will use community‐driven approaches to\nimprove access and delivery of safe water and sanitation services. Community priorities, especially those\nidentified by women, and the provision of the Water Project’s ESMF will guide the criteria for selection of\nlocations for boreholes and ensuring adequate safeguards. In addition, the project will also support\noptimal use of existing solar boreholes for refugees in Dadaab for productive community activities.\n\n\n**Table 2.1. Key Social Service Concerns Identified by Target Communities**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Specific Area|Key Concerns|\n|---|---|\n|Education|•
Poor infrastructure/facilities with limited access to teaching and learning
materials
•
Low levels of enrollment, especially among girls
•
Education system not adapted to the sociocultural context of pastoralism
•
Teachers are few and not sufficiently trained|\n|Health|•
Poor health infrastructure with weak/broken first line healthcare
•
Inadequate and unskilled healthcare labor force
•
Limited access to essential drugs and other medical supplies
•
Long distances to health facilities
•
Inadequate referral processes|\n|Water|•
Limited access to safe and clean drinking water for both human and animal
consumption
•
Unequal distribution of watering points for both human and animal consumption
•
Delayed servicing of boreholes and water pumps
•
Use of contaminated water leading to disease outbreaks and oral diseases|\n|Sanitation|•
Low latrine coverage and use
•
Unsafe human waste disposal|\n|Road
infrastructure|•
Poor road networks
•
Lack of bridges to connect different communities
•
Inadequate coverage of the road network|\n\n\n\n7. **Implementation modalities.** Planning for all three investment components will be undertaken as\na single exercise. The planning phase will coincide with the project’s effort at building implementation\ncapacity of the county and subcounty staff and community for planning, mainstreaming, and\ncoordination; and preparation of community development plans (CDPs), integrating them into the CIDPs,\nand preparing an annual action plan for the first year of implementation. A CDP will be developed and\nagreed to, based on a community‐level mapping exercise that identifies and prioritizes subprojects for\nservice delivery; areas to be addressed under environmental rehabilitation and natural resource\nmanagement; and potential traditional and non‐traditional livelihoods. The process will follow a three\nstep process: (a) an initial sensitization, awareness raising, and communications about project‐supported\ninvestments, eligibility criteria, implementation modalities, roles of different stakeholders, and rules of\nparticipation; (b) mapping of the existing situation, including resources and gaps; identification of needs\n\n\nPage 61 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Merti aquifer",
+ "confidence": 0.7249310612678528,
+ "start": 85,
+ "end": 87
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Garissa and Wajir\nCounties",
+ "confidence": 0.7808986306190491,
+ "start": 73,
+ "end": 77
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.601655125617981,
+ "start": 92,
+ "end": 93
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.5297350287437439,
+ "start": 125,
+ "end": 127
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ESMF",
+ "confidence": 0.6788234114646912,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Dadaab",
+ "confidence": 0.7129799127578735,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Education system",
+ "confidence": 0.5407562851905823,
+ "start": 290,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Dadaab",
+ "confidence": 0.5939378142356873,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "community‐level mapping exercise",
+ "confidence": 0.9119340777397156,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 625
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "identifies and prioritizes subprojects for\nservice delivery",
+ "confidence": 0.5482365489006042,
+ "start": 626,
+ "end": 633
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "first year of implementation",
+ "confidence": 0.5348701477050781,
+ "start": 603,
+ "end": 607
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 63
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nand prioritization of investments; and establishment of a community development committee to facilitate\ncommunity participation and project implementation; and (c) finalization of the community priority needs\nand subprojects by the committee by ensuring synergies with existing developmental plan and other\nongoing interventions to prevent duplication. A Village Level Committee will be established with inclusive\nrepresentation and three subcommittees on infrastructure, livelihoods and Labor Intensive Public\nWorks/Environment will also be formed to coordinate and provide oversight for respective subprojects.\nVillage level committees will be aggregated at the Ward level to ensure synergy in plans and leverage\npartnerships. This process will be facilitated by NGOs that will be contracted by the project with in‐depth\nknowledge of the project areas as well as credible implementation experience and track records. The\nCIPIU, in coordination with line ministries, will support the communities to develop subproject proposals\nincluding detailed designs. Communities will be supported with technical assistance from the county in\nimplementing subprojects. Technically complex subprojects will be contracted for by the county in\nconsultation with the community.\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 1(b): Capacity Support for Local Planning and Decentralized Service Delivery**_\n_**(approximately US$2.5 million equivalent)**_\n\n\n8. This subcomponent seeks to improve the service‐delivery capacity of county and national level\ngovernment authorities. It will support capacity support interventions for county government authorities\nand local implementing institutions in coordination with other projects and programs to ensure adequate\ncapacities in the areas of community‐driven planning process, local development management, service‐\ndelivery capacities enhancement, mainstreaming of project interventions with the government’s\ndevelopment planning and budgeting process, and coordination of all development stakeholders for local‐\nlevel and community‐level development learning. The project will also support technical assistance to\nreinforce the capacity of the Executive Office of the President, line Ministries, and specialized agencies,\nincluding the recruitment of national and international technical assistance for the planning, engineering\ndesign, procurement, construction management, safeguards, and technical monitoring of physical\ninvestments.\n\n\n**Component 2: Environmental and Natural Resource Management (approximately US$20 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n9. This component aims to decrease environmental impacts of protracted refugee presence and the\ndirect and indirect consequences on the host communities which include significant deterioration of the\nnatural resource base because of deforestation resulting from the overexploitation of wood and other\nnon‐timber forest products for various purposes (shelter, firewood, charcoal, food, medicines, and so on),\ndegradation of grazing lands, loss of wildlife, soil erosion, open disposal of solid waste especially plastics,\nand uncontrolled abstraction of groundwater for domestic consumption and livestock use. The main\ndrivers of this degradation include the unmet energy needs of the refugees and hosts, increased demand\nfor scarce water resources, and increased demand for livestock grazing. This degradation has had negative\nand limiting impacts on the livelihoods and coping mechanisms of the host areas and communities.\n\n\n10. The project will therefore support environmental and natural resource restorative measures that\nwill be executed with the participation of the communities, taking into account their needs and site\nspecificities including the use of local indigenous knowledge in the host areas. These investments will aim\nto (a) rehabilitate the targeted degraded areas (forests and rangelands) with regard to flora and fauna for\n\n\nPage 62 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 64
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nenvironmental benefits and (b) contribute to the restoration and strengthening of the livelihoods and\nbenefits of host communities through improved availability of land and forest produce including the\ngrazing conditions of the rangeland and planting of multiple‐use tree/plant species that can supply needed\nnon‐timber forest products to supplement household use, income, and consumption. Capacity building\nwill be included in all activities, including support for the formation of community environmental\nmanagement committees, community forest associations, and community wildlife associations where\nthey do not exist but are needed.\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 2(a): Integrated Natural Resources Management (approximately US$18 million**_\n_**equivalent)**_\n\n\n11. The objective of this subcomponent is to undertake targeted at‐scale community‐based\nenvironmental and natural resource restorative measures to rehabilitate and enhance the productivity of\nthese resources that will be beneficial for the local communities, the environment, livestock, and wildlife\nresources in the refugee‐hosting areas. Key strategies for environmental rehabilitation will include (a)\nnatural regeneration, (b) vegetation (grass and tree) reseeding, (c) tree planting\n(reforestation/afforestation with appropriate species), (d) rainwater harvesting, and (e) solid waste\n(especially plastics) and pollution control. Specific indicative activities include establishment of tree\nnurseries in the target sites, assisted forest regeneration, establishment of community enclosures\n(‘greenbelts’) of degraded forest areas to allow natural regeneration of indigenous trees where possible,\npromotion of drylands non‐timber forest products, grassland/rangeland rehabilitation through reseeding\nand seeding of degraded areas, rainwater harvesting through surface water harvesting works (for\nexample, semicircular contour bunds, diversions, pans, sand dams), and implementation of plastic waste\ncleanup and recycling plans through community environmental committees. The choice of specific\nstrategy/activity or combination thereof will depend on site specificities and community dynamics\n(including use of traditional local knowledge). The planning of these activities will be undertaken as part\nof the community‐driven process described under Component 1. The primary implementation modality\nfor the component will be LIPWs and specific efforts will be made to integrate women—not only into the\nlabor opportunities but also as beneficiaries of the activities.\n\n\n12. Deforestation and environmental degradation impacts in the host areas are driven in part by high\nand uncontrolled exploitation of woody biomass by refugees and hosts to meet their energy (charcoal and\nfirewood) and building (construction of shelters and fencing) needs. Woody vegetation in the ASALs of\nGarissa, Wajir, and Turkana provides useful cover to the fragile and highly erodible soils, shelter for people\nand livestock in the harsh environment, and habitats for wildlife. Critically, for these pastoral\ncommunities, trees also provide important browse for their livestock (especially camels and goats that do\nnot feed on grass). Indeed the livelihoods of many of these rural dryland communities also depend on\nnon‐timber forest products which account for a significant share of household incomes and expenditures.\nAs such, these dryland forests provide important environmental benefits—like improved soil fertility,\ncarbon sequestration, watershed protection, wildlife habitat, reduced sensitivity to drought shocks by\nmodifying the local microclimate, providing shade for people and livestock, and livelihoods’ fodder, fuel\nwood and timber and non‐timber forest products. The growing of these would be emphasized for\nenvironmental and livelihood benefits.\n\n\n13. The management will be led by local community forest associations or community environmental\ncommittees with technical assistance from the project (including counterpart partners such as Kenya\n\n\nPage 63 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 65
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nForest Service and Kenya Forest Research Institute). They will promote drylands non‐timber forest\nproducts—frankincense, gum arabic, fruits, honey, gums, resins, neem, dyes, aloe, medicines, and so on);\nhigh/multiple value trees/plants— _Acacia senegal, Melia volkensii, Acacia elatior, Cordia sinensis,_\n_Balanites aegyptiaca_, Aloe vera, mango, and so on; and fruit trees for improved nutrition by planting of\nindigenous fruit trees such as _Vitex doniana_, _Psidium_ _guajav_ a, kei apple _,_ and _Tamarindus indica_ especially\nin Garissa and Wajir. This will help the target community with food security, support improved levels and\nsources of alternative income, and ensure sustainable use and survival of rehabilitated woodlands in\ntarget areas. The growing and processing of trees for medicinal purposes and products (for example,\nacacia resin) will be promoted.\n\n\n14. Grazing lands in Dadaab and Kakuma host areas are facing severe rangeland degradation because\nof increased livestock numbers. The degradation of the rangelands has meant that as the grass stock has\nseverely depleted, the livestock species composition in some host communities has shifted away from\ngrazers (cows) toward browsers (camels/goats) with negative livelihood implications (for example, limited\nor no milk production from cows). Given that Dadaab and Kakuma host communities are primarily\npastoralists that rely on the health of their rangelands for sustenance, investments in rangeland\nrestoration and management are key to restoring community livelihoods. The project will support (a)\ngrassland/rangeland rehabilitation through reseeding and seeding of degraded areas through timely\nbroadcasting of pasture seeds; (b) enhanced community rangeland grazing management plans (including\npaddocking, grazing quotas, and community enclosures for natural regeneration) in the target areas; and\n(c) the establishment of fodder production growing plots through reseeding of degraded grazing\nland/reserves in appropriate targeted sites. This will include training and machinery for range forage\nharvesting and baling (most likely for youth groups). The reseeding of degraded grazing areas in the target\nsites will increase livestock feed for these predominantly pastoral communities.\n\n\n15. The limited surface water and groundwater resources in the host areas is facing uncontrolled\nabstraction and use. Both Dadaab and Kakuma host areas are situated in areas that face severe water\nscarcity and frequent droughts. Surface water is limited because of scarce rains. The high number of\nrefugees has led to severe competition for already limited water resources (for domestic, agriculture, and\nlivestock uses) in the host areas. This has negative impacts on the livelihoods of the host communities.\nThe project will support measures to enhance groundwater recharge (for example, through rehabilitation\nof degraded areas to enhance rainwater infiltration and reduce erosion) and increase surface water\navailability (for example, through rainwater harvesting). Targeted investments in rainwater harvesting\nthrough surface water harvesting works will include construction of semicircular contour bunds,\ndiversions, pans, sand dams, rock catchments, and micro‐catchments. This will be undertaken through\nLIPWs that will also support livelihoods of the host communities through cash payments. Responses to\ncommunity demand for small irrigation in the Merti Aquifer will be based on feasibility assessment.\n\n\n16. Poor waste disposal practices have especially led to plastics littering large areas of the landscape\naround Dadaab and Kakuma host areas. There are limited efforts to reduce, re‐use, collect, and recycle\nthese plastics. The project will support the development and implementation of plastic waste cleanup and\nrecycling plans through community environmental committees (preferably employing the youth in the\nhost areas).\n\n\nPage 64 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 66
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 2(b): Access to Energy (approximately US$2 million equivalent)**_\n\n\n17. This subcomponent seeks to improve the host communities’ access to clean energy by promoting\nthe better use of energy resources and increasing access to alternative sources of renewable energy.\nSupport will be given to interventions that address the host communities’ energy requirements, such as\ndomestic cooking and lighting; social services such as schools and health services; and productive\nactivities, including lighting for small shops and businesses, tourism and entertainment, and\nmanufacturing and processing. Household cooking is predominantly based on firewood and charcoal. To\naddress concerns associated with the overdependence of and health risks associated with these forms of\nenergy for household use, the project will support various activities ranging from the establishment of\nwoodlots and production and deployment of improved cooking devices with appropriate community\nconsultations about methods of cooking and baking to the development of types of high calorific fuels,\nincluding processed charcoal that can be locally available. Solar lanterns and lamps are among the options\nfor meeting home and street lighting as well as mobile phone charging needs. The inputs provided by this\nproject will be complementary to the proposed World Bank‐financed Kenya Off‐grid Solar Access Project.\nTraining will be provided on the use of the new devices (energy‐saving cook‐stoves) and the development\nof high calorific fuels such as briquettes. Also, support from the project will be given for monitoring use,\nregular maintenance, and repairs of devices and production units.\n\n\n**Component 3: Livelihoods Program (approximately US$27.5 million equivalent)**\n\n\n18. Refugee‐hosting communities around the Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps derive their\nincomes either from traditional livelihoods, including pastoralism, agropastoralism, and small‐scale\nagriculture; and/or non‐traditional livelihoods including small businesses, unskilled labor, skills‐based\njobs, and service enterprises. Both forms of livelihoods are characterized by limited access to capital,\ninputs, capacity building, and technical support to increase productivity; low‐level technologies and skills\nwith low productivity; and poor market and other infrastructure and resultant low incomes. The support\nto livelihoods aims to improve the productivity of traditional and non‐traditional livelihoods and\nstrengthen the resilience of communities. The support will include (a) improved access to factors of\nproduction like finance, technology, equipment, storage, and infrastructure; and (b) mobilization and\nselection of beneficiary groups and the formation and strengthening of CIGs and producer cooperatives.\nThe component will target households based on vulnerability, giving priority to women and youth with at\nleast 50 percent of beneficiaries expected to be women. The component will ensure convergence with\nother livelihood interventions in the target area.\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 3(a): Support to Traditional and Non‐Traditional Livelihoods (approximately US$25**_\n_**million equivalent)**_\n\n\n19. The objective of this subcomponent is to increase the production and productivity of pastoralism\n(livestock), agropastoralism (crop and livestock), agriculture (crops and livestock) and fisheries; and\ncommercialize these livelihood activities for improved incomes, employment, and self‐reliance.\nPrioritization will depend on the potential of the target county and the subcounty, livelihoods practiced,\ncommunity interests, capacities, and market demand. The Sub‐component will support formation of\ncommunity groups for undertaking livelihood activities, formation of producer organizations for higher\norder livelihoods, business development support to individual small businesses, and training and\nplacement of youth in demand driven market oriented skills. Support will include (a) improved production\n\n\nPage 65 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 67
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nthrough access to input and output markets, technology and equipment, access to storage and processing\ninfrastructure, access to finance; (b) mobilization and selection of beneficiary groups, the formation of\nproject CGs, aggregation into producer cooperatives wherever appropriate, and strengthening capacities\nof existing and new producer cooperatives for accessing input and output markets; and (c) enhanced skills\nfor increased employability, enterprise development, promotion of other income generating activities.\nBeneficiaries will receive grants to finance livelihoods subproject proposals. The proposed interventions\nare indicative (Table 2.2) and will be informed by the lessons learned and building on the experience of\nthe line ministries and will be tailored to the local contexts. Some of the experiences to build on will\ninclude current livestock improvement projects by county governments and NGOs; the World Bank‐\nsupported Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Project; current programs supporting small‐scale agriculture and\nhorticulture activities like Kulan Community Farming Project, Kenya Red Cross supported project,\nMillennium Villages initiative, and the World Bank‐supported Kenya Agriculture Productivity and\nAgribusiness Project; current business training and support projects like Youth and Women Enterprise\nfunds, Community Microfinance Projects, business development grants, and training support projects;\nand current skills development projects by NGOs like Don Bosco and Norwegian Refugee Council and the\nWorld Bank‐supported Kenya Youth Employment Opportunities Project.\n\n\n**Table 2.2. Traditional and Non‐Traditional Intervention Areas Identified by Various Stakeholders**\n\n\n\n\n\n|Key Needs|Intervention Areas|\n|---|---|\n|Improving
pastoral
livelihoods| Livestock productivity ‐ breed improvement; vaccinations and provision of veterinary
services; modern way of animal keeping; and restocking
Livestock value chains ‐ live animals such as camels, cattle, sheep, goats; meat value chain;
milk value chain; and livestock byproducts such as hides and skins, bones, and manure
Credit availability to existing livestock‐based groups
Capacity building and training of various livestock‐based groups to gain skills and
technologies to improve their livelihoods and exposure visits|\n|Small‐scale
agriculture
and
horticulture
activities| Increase access to water supply for agriculture production ‐ construction of rainwater
harvesting structures, bunds, water pans, and borehole drilling, irrigation, and so on
Extension service delivery, crop productivity enhancing technologies, strengthening
horticulture nurseries, and improved agronomic practices
Input supply and market access
Capacity‐building and exposure visits for farmer groups through farmer field schools and so
on
Poultry farming and beekeeping activities|\n|Business
development
support| Support existing businesses rather than starting up of new businesses (80 percent support
to existing, 20 percent to new businesses)
Support existing businesses and intermediaries (as applicable) through business training,
exposure visits, business advisory services, and market linkage support
Provide financial support to businesses
Linking to financial institutions—once targeted groups and households have implemented
their business plans, the project will link them to financial institutions such as banks or
microfinance institutions for higher‐order support|\n|Skills
development| Undertake skills training for targeted groups and households based on market demand,
skills gap, and community needs, that is, demand‐driven skills in non‐traditional areas
Conduct market needs assessment to guide the skills training in the selected communities
and provide market‐oriented skills training to youth|\n\n\nPage 66 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.753596842288971,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7785618901252747,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5015015602111816,
+ "start": 106,
+ "end": 107
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Livestock value chains",
+ "confidence": 0.5090216398239136,
+ "start": 349,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "market needs assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9940003156661987,
+ "start": 723,
+ "end": 726
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "selected communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7862454056739807,
+ "start": 733,
+ "end": 735
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 68
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n|Key Needs|Intervention Areas|\n|---|---|\n|| As applicable, support and develop capacity of existing local skills training
facilities/technical and vocational training institutions to enable them to deliver improved
services to targeted groups
Support already trained youth through post‐training follow‐up and support services
(placement linkages, supporting them to improve their business activities). An indicative
menu of non‐traditional livelihood options includes electrician, plumbing, motor vehicle
mechanic, masonry, solar technicians, basic computer skills, dress making, mat making,
bead making, and so on, based on consultations with key stakeholders will be market
tested for prioritization during the planning phase.|\n\n\n\n20. Women and youth from the poor and vulnerable households will be targeted on a priority basis\n(indicative criteria in Table 2.3) and will be mobilized into CGs, focusing on those interested in starting\nand/or expanding a business, with some prior experience in the proposed business area and members of\nvillage/local‐saving groups such as VSLAs. Identification criteria for the individual beneficiary and groups\nwill include 3 to 5 years of residence in the area, as certified by the local leaders, to prevent opportunistic\ninflux and exclusion of the locals.\n\n\n**Table 2.3. Indicative Criteria for Beneficiary Identification for Non‐Traditional Livelihoods**\n\n|Women|Youth|\n|---|---|\n|
Three to five years of residence in the area as
certified by the local leaders
From poor households; preference for the most
vulnerable including destitute and widows
included under the single social protection
registry
Capable of work with no outstanding loan and
belonging to the target group
Lack of productive assets and formal employment
Have an existing business and interested in
expanding their businesses or interested to start a
business with prior experience in the proposed
business area|
18–30 years of age, both male and female
Three to five years of residence in the area as
certified by the local leaders
Capable of work with no outstanding loan and
belonging to the target group
Lack of productive assets and formal employment
Have an existing business and interested in
expanding their businesses or interested to start a
business with prior experience in the proposed
business area
|\n\n\n\n_Note:_ Priority will be given to (a) females (at least 50 percent); and (b) those who are members of village/local‐saving\ngroups. Method for identifying needy households: participatory wealth ranking at the community level.\n\n\n21. The labor‐intensive public works for natural resources management under Component 2 will\nprovide temporary employment and smoothen consumption of the poor and vulnerable, including youth.\nHowever, engaging poor youth in public works alone is not going to result in the desired long‐term impact.\nTherefore, the livelihoods program will carefully explore the potential for youth to graduate out of public\nworks to non‐traditional livelihoods. When the temporary employment provided under the public works\ncomes to an end, the youth beneficiaries will continue to manage their lives sustainably with regard to\nincome generation and food security and, thus, over a period, move from temporary employment to\nlonger‐term employment.\n\n\nPage 67 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 69
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n_Implementation Strategy and Phasing for Traditional and Non‐Traditional Livelihoods_\n\n\n22. The subcomponent will be implemented in a phased manner: (a) planning phase (6 months); (b)\npilot phase or first implementation cycle (16‐18 months); and (c) rolling out phase or 2 [nd] to 4 [th]\nimplementation cycles (three years). The planning phase will be common across all components. Critical\nto this process will also be a quick assessment of the other ongoing and proposed investments in the\ntarget area through the GoK, World Bank, and other development agencies supported projects that would\nrequire skilled labor. This includes the water supply project where skilled masons will be required, off‐grid\nsolar project which will require local youth who can be trained in consultation and support of the private\nsector in installation, operations and maintenance, and collection of payments for solar devices\nestablished; road project in Kakuma; and so on.\n\n\n23. The pilot phase for this component will be implemented in a comprehensive manner and will first\ntarget a cluster of villages in a subcounty with a higher degree of poverty to provide comprehensive\nlivelihood support, test the model, and demonstrate impact. During the pilot phase, community\ninstitutions for livelihoods will be established and strengthened. The pilot phase or first implementation\ncycle will enable the focus on selective market‐driven livelihood activities/enterprises at the Ward/cluster\nlevel to achieve efficiencies of scale for accessing both input and output markets and forging private sector\nlinkages. During the rollout phase/2 [nd] to 4 [th] implementation cycles, the learning from the pilot villages will\ninform the implementation and scaling up the livelihood program in the remaining villages of participating\nsubcounties in a systematic manner to ensure that the limited resources lead to greater impact and\nsustainability.\n\n\n_Implementation Arrangements for the Livelihood Program_\n\n\n24. The CDD‐based implementation will embed community participation, ownership, and\ntransparency and accountability at all steps across planning, the decision‐making process, and the\nimplementation and operation and maintenance of livelihood assets and economic infrastructure, while\nusing existing institutions and the Government systems. The implementation arrangement shown in the\nFigure 2.1 is indicative.\n\n\nPage 68 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 70
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Figure 2.1. Implementation Arrangements for the Livelihoods Program**\n\n\n25. CGs, Village‐level Livelihoods Sub‐Committees (VLSCs), Ward‐level Committees, and producer\norganizations will be key community institutions. The roles and responsibilities of community institutions\nprovided in Table 2.4 are indicative. The detailed roles and responsibilities of community institutions and\nother key stakeholders will be finalized during the planning phase and included in the PIM.\n\n\n**Table 2.4. Roles and Responsibilities of Community Institutions**\n\n\n\n|Community
Institutions|Key Functions|Project Inputs|\n|---|---|---|\n|CGs|
Will be based on livelihood activities, but
initially will be take up saving/thrift
activities and will revolve savings and
provide credit to each other
Form community project management
committee (CPMC) and community
procurement��committee (CPC)
Prepare business plan proposals and
implement them
Federate into the Village level and will
be further progressed into the producer
organizations
Minimum ten members, at least 50
percent females|
Capacity building support and grading to
assess the quality of groups
Provide CGs with technical assistance for
identifying livelihood opportunities,
preparing detailed business plans
incorporating measures to reduce various
market risks, linkages with banks and
other financial institutions to access
financing for business plans, and provide
financial support through for their
livelihood activities
Prepare a roster of service providers and
develop rate banks for various goods and
services to be procured, for preparation
of realistic business plans|\n\n\nPage 69 of 120\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 71
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Village Level
Livelihoods
Sub‐
Committee18
17F| Ensure CGs compliance with the
livelihood program rules
Arrange technical appraisal of the
business plans
Minimum of three CGs forms a Village
level livelihood sub‐committee
Office bearers ‐ president, secretary,
treasurer and a bank signatory| Provide capacity‐building support to the
Village level livelihood sub‐committee
Facilitate access to financial resources
from financial institutions to the CGs
Grading to assess institutional
preparedness to handling funds|\n|---|---|---|\n|Ward Level
Committee|
Unit for aggregation of information on
common enterprises and linkages with
financial institutions, the private sector,
and relevant government agencies
Will consist of two representatives of the
village livelihoods sub‐committee|
Provide capacity‐building support to the
committee|\n|Producer
Organization|
Procurement of inputs for production
Local processing and storing of inputs
and outputs
Marketing and selling of produce or
products
Develop commercial relationships with
markets, private sector, cooperatives,
and public sector agencies|
Support CGs engaged in common
livelihood activities to aggregate into a
producer organization to benefit from
economies of scale
Provide funding for capacity building,
start‐up costs, and working capital
Provide support to leverage working
capital and assets from financial
institutions
The producer organizations will leverage
the economic infrastructure supported
under Component 1 of the project|\n|SACF19|
Village councils and village assemblies
will appoint an SAC
Perform internal monitoring function and
periodic audits (including financial) of
project activities and report their findings
directly to the Village Councils and Village
Assemblies.
The SAC will also observe the functioning
of VLCs including village level livelihoods
sub‐committee as well as adherence to
project principles and rules|
Provide capacity‐building support to
Village Councils and Village Assemblies for
appointing the SAC
Provide capacity building to the SAC to
perform monitoring and periodic audits|\n\n\n\n26. The CGs will be registered with the office of Subcounty Social Development Officer. The livelihood\ninterventions will be supported by the departments in the relevant ministries including the Ministry of\nPastoral Economy and Fisheries; Ministry of Water Services, Irrigation, and Agriculture; Ministry of\nTourism, Trade, and Industrialization; and Ministry of Education, Gender, Human Resource Development,\n\n\n18 Village Level Livelihoods sub‐committee will be a sub‐committee under village level committee.\n19 The Turkana and Wajir Counties already have social audit and accountability mechanism, set up with the support of\nTransparency International and led by the county. These will be assessed and built upon.\n\n\nPage 70 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 72
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nSocial, and Cultural Services. The detailed implementation arrangements for livelihoods program will be\nfinalized during the planning phase and included in the PIM.\n\n\n27. **Financial support for livelihood activities.** The funds to support livelihoods activities of CGs will\nflow directly from project account at County level to CG accounts as a grant. The CGs will receive livelihood\ngrants after following the five core group principles, 19F [20] participating in various trainings, and approval of\ntheir business plans. The proposed funds flow arrangement is aimed to ensure community institutions\npreparedness to handle funds flowing through them, incentivizing good performance, providing funding\nreflecting the maturity of the CGs, thinking and planning on livelihood opportunity, and adherence to FM\nstandards and discipline.\n\n\n28. The social capital developed through formation and capacity building of the CGs will serve as the\nbuilding block for aggregating CGs with similar livelihood activities into producer organizations. The\naggregation will enable CGs to access higher‐level services by leveraging on economies of scale for\nprocurement of inputs, marketing, finance, services, knowledge access, developing and managing\ncommon facilities and infrastructure, and accessing the higher value in the value chain. A producer\norganization will start with mature CGs and will later invite other CG members from the area to join, as\ntheir capacities and interests grow. The individual CGs engaged in specific livelihoods will become\nshareholders or members of the producer organization. The project will provide financial support to the\nproducer organizations for capacity building and meeting start‐up costs and working capital. The project\nwill also support them to leverage working capital and assets from financial institutions. The producer\norganizations will also leverage the economic infrastructure supported under Component 1 of the project.\nThe detailed guidelines on revolving funds, the format for financing agreements, business plans, and other\nrelated information will be included in the PIM.\n\n\n_**Subcomponent 3(b): Capacity Building of Community‐Based Organizations for Livelihoods**_\n_**(approximately US$2.5 million equivalent)**_\n\n\n29. The objective of this subcomponent is to improve capacities of community institutions for\nlivelihoods given their primacy in inclusive implementation and sustainability of project investments. For\nlivelihoods promotion, the community institutions are CGs, village level livelihoods sub‐committees,\nward/cluster level committees, and producer organizations.\n\n\n30. Global experience shows that livelihoods’ programs need a strong facilitation team to change the\nbehavior of beneficiary groups, which will manifest into improvement in livelihoods. The project will\nsupport establishment and operations of the field‐based facilitation teams to provide support to\ncommunity institutions for livelihoods in social mobilization, institution building, and capacity building.\nThe facilitation teams will operate at village and cluster/ward levels. Under this subcomponent, a resource\norganization with experience in social mobilization, community institutions building, and community\ncapacity building will be engaged during the pilot phase to provide necessary training, exposure, and\nhandholding support to facilitation teams to strengthen them and to induce institution building and\ndevelop strong community structures at the village level. The CGs will be trained in group management,\nsavings, financial literacy, and bookkeeping and encouraged to practice regular meetings, regular savings,\nregular inter‐loaning, timely repayment, and up‐to‐date books of accounts. In addition to this, the\n\n\n20 Five principles are weekly meetings, weekly savings, inter‐loaning, timely repayment, proper record keeping\n\n\nPage 71 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 73
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nsubcomponent will support the capacity building and technical assistance for major livelihood activities\nthrough private sector, public sector, and civil society service providers including technical training in\nlivestock, agriculture, and other sectors for community organizations, building linkages for value chain\ninvestments, establishing market linkages for producer organization products, and so on. The\nsubcomponent will use technology to strengthen the facilitation.\n\n\n31. The capacity‐building efforts of community institutions for livelihoods will be coordinated by\nrespective County Project Implementation Units which will have the overall responsibility for capacity\nbuilding. The subcomponent will also support training and exposure for county, subcounty, and ward‐\nlevel officials and consultants involved in the implementation of livelihoods program. These efforts will be\naimed to strengthen capacities and systems in counties and subcounties for the effective and efficient\nmanagement of the livelihoods program and strengthening capacities of the community institutions for\nlivelihoods.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation, and Knowledge Sharing**\n**(approximately US$7.5 million equivalent)**\n\n\n32. The objectives of this component are to ensure enhanced and effective project management,\ncoordination, and implementation and to support the design of the project’s M&E system, which will be\ndescribed in detail in the M&E manual. The implementation of the proposed operation will follow existing\nGovernment structures. To ensure robust project management and implementation, Steering\nCommittees and Technical Committees will be established at national and county levels. While the\nScreening Committees will provide broader oversight and ensure cross‐sector coordination, the Technical\nCommittees will ensure technical guidance and backstopping to project management as well as\nimplementation. The National Implementation Support Unit (NPIU) and County Integrated\nImplementation Support Units (CIPIU) will provide implementation support and monitoring of the project\nat national and county level. The project will build on existing community‐level structures, and will\nestablish new local‐level institutions as needed, including VLC, WLC, and social audit committees (SACs).\n\n\n33. The component will support the design of the project’s MIS for monitoring inputs, outputs, and\nprocesses; the evaluation of outcome and impacts; monitoring environmental and social safeguard; and\nparticipatory M&E and internal learning. M&E activities will include regular monitoring of the progress\nand performance of implementation; independent process monitoring of the community‐level planning\nand effectiveness and quality of capacity‐building efforts; and undertaking annual thematic studies and\noutcome as well as impact assessments of the project. The project’s Results Framework will be used as a\nbasis for reporting progress against indicators, including progress toward achieving the PDO and\nimplementation progress. The project will consider the use of mobile technologies to increase the reach\nand frequency of data capturing at the local level and aggregating it in a platform that could serve as a\ndashboard.\n\n\n34. Kenya will join other DRDIP countries in the Project Regional Steering Committee (PRSC) hosted\nby the FDMM Regional Secretariat anchored in the IGAD and represented by nominees of its national SCs\nand the project coordinator. It will benefit from the FDMM Regional Secretariat‐led activities including\nresearch commissioned, knowledge curated and generated, the lessons learned, and the coordination\nsharing and learning in the project countries; all key responsibilities of the FDMM Regional Secretariat.\n\n\nPage 72 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5156635642051697,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.608379065990448,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E system",
+ "confidence": 0.9142741560935974,
+ "start": 247,
+ "end": 251
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MIS",
+ "confidence": 0.579500138759613,
+ "start": 411,
+ "end": 412
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring inputs, outputs, and\nprocesses",
+ "confidence": 0.8732736110687256,
+ "start": 413,
+ "end": 420
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual thematic studies",
+ "confidence": 0.9198006987571716,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 483
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "reporting progress against indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6383081674575806,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 511
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 74
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nThe PRSC will provide oversight of the implementation of the regional program and will guide, advise, and\nsupport a regional policy dialogue.\n\n\n**Component 5: Support to IGAD for Expansion of the Regional Secretariat on FDMM (US$3 million**\n**equivalent)**\n\n\n119. This component will support the expansion of IGAD’s existing Regional Secretariat for FDMM to\ninclude Kenya that will join other DRDIP countries in the PRSC and represented by nominees of its national\nsteering committee and the project coordinator. Kenya as well as all other IGAD’s Member States will\nbenefit from the Regional Secretariat‐led activities including research, knowledge generation, the\ndocumentation of lessons learned to enhance the coordination, knowledge sharing, and learning across\nthe project countries. The RPSC will provide oversight of the implementation of the regional program and\nwill guide, advise, and support a regional policy dialogue. In addition, this component will support DRDIP\nproject countries and other IGAD Member States to: (i) discuss the challenge of the Somalia displacement\nthat they all have in common and; (ii) engage the Republic of Somalia to more effectively participate in\nthis dialogue and also to take a lead role in the planning and coordination of displacement‐responsive\ndevelopment in places of return and on addressing displacement challenges more widely (details in Annex\n6).\n\n\n120. Somalia’s arrears status and non‐IDA eligibility means that there are few opportunities for large‐\nscale investment by the World Bank in directly supporting sustainable return of refugees or the\nimplementation of development responses to forced displacement at the present time. Multiple other\nactors are, however, mobilizing support for area‐based multisectoral development investment in places\nof return in Somalia as well as defining durable solutions for wider displacement challenges. Those efforts\nto build community resilience to support the reintegration of returning refugees, while also addressing\nissues of vulnerability and internal displacement, are gaining pace.\n\n\n121. The component will be implemented in two stages. In the first stage, the IGAD FDMM Regional\nSecretariat will commission a rapid assessment to assess the capacity, processes, and systems building\nneeds in support of return and reintegration including a quick mapping and profiling of key actors. This\nassessment will build on capacity diagnostic work under way by other actors. The results of the\nassessment will enable the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat to define a plan for bringing Republic of\nSomalia into relevant and existing regional capacity building initiatives being undertaken by the Regional\nSecretariat. This planning exercise will result in an implementation plan to be completed within six months\nof effectiveness of this grant. The implementation plan will be finalized on the basis of consultation with\nkey stakeholders and will be reviewed to be acceptable to the World Bank.\n\n\n122. In the second stage, in subsequent years, activities will be funded in accordance with the agreed\nimplementation plan. Illustrative activities that may be funded under the component include the\nexpansion of existing regional technical assistance provided by the Regional Secretariat for FDMM on the\nfollowing topics: (a) Provision of technical assistance for developing relevant policies and appropriate\nguidelines for ensuring a coordinated development response in return areas and to address forced\ndisplacement more widely; (b) Provision of technical assistance for building capacities, systems, and\nprocesses for sustainable return and reintegration of refugees and displaced persons; (c) Development\nand management of a database to include mapping of pressure points, services, spatial planning to\ndetermine gaps in provision, identify priorities for areas and agencies, and prevent duplication and\n\n\nPage 73 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.5519163608551025,
+ "start": 64,
+ "end": 65
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rapid assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.711239218711853,
+ "start": 410,
+ "end": 412
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD FDMM Regional\nSecretariat",
+ "confidence": 0.5197794437408447,
+ "start": 403,
+ "end": 407
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Republic of\nSomalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6348623633384705,
+ "start": 473,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "key actors",
+ "confidence": 0.639849841594696,
+ "start": 436,
+ "end": 438
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "database",
+ "confidence": 0.983225405216217,
+ "start": 655,
+ "end": 656
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "return areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5122478008270264,
+ "start": 611,
+ "end": 613
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees and displaced persons",
+ "confidence": 0.8735050559043884,
+ "start": 642,
+ "end": 646
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 75
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ninefficiencies; (d) Regular monitoring, reporting, and learning from experiences for scaling up; and (e)\nResponding to ‘just‐in‐time’ needs expressed by the government authorities, which could range from\nproviding an expert with specific skills, to reviewing documents or carrying out assessments.\n\n\n123. The component will also enable the existing IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM based in Nairobi\nand Djibouti to augment its staffing and operational resources to support the expanded mandate. The\ncomponent design takes into account the IDA regional guidelines and the Bank’s policy on countries with\nloans in nonaccrual status. IGAD will manage, contract and ensure fiduciary compliance of all component\nactivities.\n\n\n_Coordination with the NEDI_\n\n\n35. The NEDI is focused on delivering transformative and integrated infrastructure investments and\nsupport to sustainable livelihoods in the north and northeast of Kenya, regions which historically have\nbeen underserved and are performing below the national average on development indicators. Specifically,\nthe NEDI includes the following ten counties: Garissa, Isiolo, Lamu, Mandera, Marsabit, Samburu, Tana\nRiver, Turkana, Wajir, and West Pokot.\n\n\n36. The DRDIP II is one of the six NEDI backbone projects, which are being prepared on a similar\ntimeline. The remaining five projects are (a) the Off‐Grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties,\n(b) the Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, (c) the Water and Sanitation Development Project, (d)\nthe North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, and (e) the National Safety Net Program (NSNP) for\nResults Additional Financing. Besides these new operations, two other World Bank projects with potential\nlinks to the DRDIP II in Kenya are already active in the project area—the Regional Pastoral Livelihoods\nResilience Project (in all three DRDIP II project counties in Kenya) and the National Agricultural and Rural\nInclusive Growth Project in Turkana. Throughout implementation, coordination between these projects\nat all relevant levels will be key to achieve synergies and avoid inefficiencies. Table 2.5 provides the\ncomplementarities between these operations and the DRDIP II.\n\n\n**Table 2.5. Complementarities between the DRDIP II and NEDI Operations**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Community‐ and
County‐Level
Investments|Targeting and
Planning Processes|Implementation
Arrangements|Overlaps with
DRDIP II|Role for DRDIP II|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, P161305 ‐ Wajir
Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Project (Second Phase of Program)
P148853 ‐ Turkana|North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, P161305 ‐ Wajir
Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Project (Second Phase of Program)
P148853 ‐ Turkana|North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, P161305 ‐ Wajir
Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Project (Second Phase of Program)
P148853 ‐ Turkana|North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, P161305 ‐ Wajir
Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Project (Second Phase of Program)
P148853 ‐ Turkana|North Eastern Transport Improvement Project, P161305 ‐ Wajir
Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Project (Second Phase of Program)
P148853 ‐ Turkana|\n|Besides road and ICT
investments, provisions
for roadside social
amenities (for example,
markets, schools) and
HIV/AIDS prevention
measures|Needs assessments
to be conducted
under each project
Planning and
design will be
undertaken by the
same consultancy|Roads contractor
will implement
social amenities
after needs
assessment
Resident engineers
to supervise|Roadside
markets
(including
water,
electrification,
milk coolers,
slaughter
houses,
veterinary
posts,|Coordination on
roadside facilities|\n\n\n\nPage 74 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 76
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Community‐ and
County‐Level
Investments|Targeting and
Planning Processes|Implementation
Arrangements|Overlaps with
DRDIP II|Role for DRDIP II|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||livestock
holding areas,
fiber
connectivity)||\n|Kenya: Off‐grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties, P160009 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|Kenya: Off‐grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties, P160009 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|Kenya: Off‐grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties, P160009 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|Kenya: Off‐grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties, P160009 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|Kenya: Off‐grid Solar Access Project for Underserved Counties, P160009 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|\n|Component 1: Mini‐
grids for community
facilities, enterprises,
and households
Component 2:
Standalone solar
systems for households
Component 3:
Standalone solar
systems for community
facilities
Component 4: Solar
water pumping for
drinking water and
irrigation, including
irrigation pilot|Geospatial plan
and county‐level
processes
120 mini‐grid sites
preliminarily
identified
All unelectrified
existing community
facilities to be
covered|Component 1: PPP
(KPLC)
Component 2:
Private sector
through grant and
debt facility
operated by third
party under MoEP
oversight
Component 3: KPLC
and private sector
service provider
Component 4:
Private providers
through financing
facilities at WSTF|Electrification
of community
facilities
Clean cooking
solutions for
host
communities
Solar water
pumping for
boreholes|Collaboration on
clean cooking
solutions for refugee‐
host communities
(initially in Turkana
only)
Coordination on
electrification of
community facilities
and boreholes|\n|Water and Sanitation Development Project, P156634 ‐ Wajir town and Dadaab host communities|Water and Sanitation Development Project, P156634 ‐ Wajir town and Dadaab host communities|Water and Sanitation Development Project, P156634 ‐ Wajir town and Dadaab host communities|Water and Sanitation Development Project, P156634 ‐ Wajir town and Dadaab host communities|Water and Sanitation Development Project, P156634 ‐ Wajir town and Dadaab host communities|\n|Mitigating impacts of
water scarcity and
drought; improving
medium/long‐term
water access; improving
access to sanitation
services; technical
assistance to WSPs|Using Merti aquifer
study and water
masterplan for
Dadaab host
communities;
counties/WSPs|Counties and their
WSPs implementing
county‐specific
activities.
WSPs implementing
activities that
involve more than
one county|Water
investments in
Dadaab host
communities|Coordination around
the Merti aquifer
study and Dadaab
host community
water masterplan
and designs|\n|Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, P154784 ‐ Garissa and Wajir|Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, P154784 ‐ Garissa and Wajir|Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, P154784 ‐ Garissa and Wajir|Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, P154784 ‐ Garissa and Wajir|Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project, P154784 ‐ Garissa and Wajir|\n|Investments in
smallholder
agropastoral and
pastoral production
systems at community,
VMG, and county/cross‐
county level
Capacity building for
counties, wards and
communities|CDD, CCAFS‐CIAT
CSA Priority
Framework,
priority value
chains, County CSA
Plans, NEDI
Investment Plan
Four to six wards in
up to three
subcounties per
county|County: CPSC
chaired by CEC Agr.,
County Technical
Advisory
Committee, CPCU
Community: CDDOs
facilitated by private
service providers
Counties joining
based on readiness
indicators|Capacity
building for
counties,
wards, and
communities
SLM, water
management,
animal health,
energy,
market
access,|Coordination of
county‐ and
community‐level
processes and
investments|\n\n\n\nPage 75 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8845992684364319,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6531199812889099,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Off‐grid Solar Access Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5215508937835693,
+ "start": 112,
+ "end": 118
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.8082593679428101,
+ "start": 110,
+ "end": 111
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Underserved Counties",
+ "confidence": 0.6146686673164368,
+ "start": 119,
+ "end": 121
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "irrigation pilot",
+ "confidence": 0.8904221057891846,
+ "start": 305,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water and Sanitation Development Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6349371671676636,
+ "start": 543,
+ "end": 548
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Merti aquifer",
+ "confidence": 0.6088995933532715,
+ "start": 669,
+ "end": 671
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water masterplan",
+ "confidence": 0.9056978821754456,
+ "start": 778,
+ "end": 780
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5154721736907959,
+ "start": 787,
+ "end": 792
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5283476710319519,
+ "start": 787,
+ "end": 788
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CSA Priority",
+ "confidence": 0.5155843496322632,
+ "start": 912,
+ "end": 914
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "CDDOs",
+ "confidence": 0.5973682999610901,
+ "start": 998,
+ "end": 999
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 77
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Community‐ and
County‐Level
Investments|Targeting and
Planning Processes|Implementation
Arrangements|Overlaps with
DRDIP II|Role for DRDIP II|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n||||livelihood
diversification,
breeding
programs||\n|National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, P153349 – Turkana|National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, P153349 – Turkana|National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, P153349 – Turkana|National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, P153349 – Turkana|National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, P153349 – Turkana|\n|Community‐level: Four
investment windows:
SLM in value chains,
livelihoods
interventions, VMG
support, nutrition
(supported by capacity
building, including to
POs)
County‐level:
Landscape‐wide SLM
investments, value
chain‐related
infrastructure
investments using
employment programs
in addition to capacity
building|CDD and priority
value chains
Competitive
county‐level
investments
(aligned with CIDP
and ADP)
Three to five wards
from each
subcounty in the
participating
counties|County: CPSC
chaired by County
Secretary, County
Technical Advisory
Committee, CPCU
Community: CDDCs
facilitated by private
service providers
Counties joining
based on readiness
indicators|Capacity
building for
counties on
CDD;
formation of
CIGs;
strengthening
of POs; value
chain
approach;
grassroots
financial
institutions;
employment
programs;
livelihoods
support|Coordination of
county‐ and
community‐level
processes and
investments|\n|National Safety Net Program for Results, P131305 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|National Safety Net Program for Results, P131305 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|National Safety Net Program for Results, P131305 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|National Safety Net Program for Results, P131305 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|National Safety Net Program for Results, P131305 ‐ Garissa, Wajir, and Turkana|\n|Cash Transfer for
Orphans and Vulnerable
Children (CT‐OVC);
Older Persons Cash
Transfer (OPCT);
Persons with Severe
Disability Cash Transfer
(PWSD‐CT); Hunger
Safety Net Program
(HSNP)|Harmonized
targeting tool using
proxy means test
formula was
developed|CT‐OVC, OPCT,
PWSD‐CT:
MEACL&SP, but
consolidation under
newly established
SAU, DCS and DSD at
county and
subcounty levels;
HSNP: NDMA|Addressing
VMGs|Linking public works
with safety nets
program|\n|AFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience P129408 ‐ Turkana, Wajir, and Garissa|AFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience P129408 ‐ Turkana, Wajir, and Garissa|AFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience P129408 ‐ Turkana, Wajir, and Garissa|AFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience P129408 ‐ Turkana, Wajir, and Garissa|AFCC2/RI‐Regional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience P129408 ‐ Turkana, Wajir, and Garissa|\n|Natural resource
management, market
access and trade,
livelihoods support,|Selection of broad
investment areas
in the county by
county/PIU;|County level: CSC
approving
subprojects, County
Project Service|Community
support on
NRM,
boreholes,|Coordination around
CMDRR process and
county level
implementation|\n\n\nPage 76 of 120\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 78
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Community‐ and
County‐Level
Investments|Targeting and
Planning Processes|Implementation
Arrangements|Overlaps with
DRDIP II|Role for DRDIP II|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|pastoral risk
management|Community
Managed Disaster
Risk Reduction
(CMDRR)
approach;
alignment with
CIDP|Team, CPCU
Subcounty service
units coordinated by
the CPCU|livelihoods
activities,
livestock
health,
marketing,
breeding
programs|arrangements,
coordination of
similar investments|\n|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Support to Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) ‐
Wajir and Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Support to Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) ‐
Wajir and Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Support to Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) ‐
Wajir and Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Support to Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) ‐
Wajir and Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Support to Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) ‐
Wajir and Garissa|\n|Surge capacity (housed
at FCDC) to counties on
core systems;
socioeconomic blueprint
for FCDC counties;
improved citizen
engagement in FCDC
counties|Surge capacity to
be provided on
needs basis with
standardized
tools/approaches|FCDC to counties|Mainly
capacity
building on
citizen
engagement|Coordinate with
county capacity
building under the
FCDC initiatives,
especially on citizen
engagement|\n|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Conflict and Violence Prevention Training (CVPT) ‐ Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Conflict and Violence Prevention Training (CVPT) ‐ Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Conflict and Violence Prevention Training (CVPT) ‐ Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Conflict and Violence Prevention Training (CVPT) ‐ Garissa|Kenya Accountable Devolution Program (KADP): Conflict and Violence Prevention Training (CVPT) ‐ Garissa|\n|ToT and CVPT based on
previous
surveys/analysis of
conflict and violence in
the county|Selection of
participants to be
determined|Through KSG with
support from United
States International
University Africa|Conflict
resolution
activities|Selection of
participants; apply
capacities/knowledge
generated through
survey/training|\n|Kenya Devolution Support Program, P149129 ‐ Wajir, Garissa, and Turkana|Kenya Devolution Support Program, P149129 ‐ Wajir, Garissa, and Turkana|Kenya Devolution Support Program, P149129 ‐ Wajir, Garissa, and Turkana|Kenya Devolution Support Program, P149129 ‐ Wajir, Garissa, and Turkana|Kenya Devolution Support Program, P149129 ‐ Wajir, Garissa, and Turkana|\n|Performance and
capacity grants to
counties in support of
the National Capacity
Building Framework|Based on
performance and
county capacity
development plans|County
governments,
MoDP, COG, NT,
OAG, KSG|Capacity
building on
citizen
engagement
and county
safeguards
capacity|Build on capacity
assessment and plans
prepared under KDSP|\n\n\n\nPage 77 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8908212184906006,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5182029604911804,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.7286317944526672,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Accountable Devolution Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5926093459129333,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5350591540336609,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Accountable Devolution Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5355817675590515,
+ "start": 215,
+ "end": 219
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "FCDC counties",
+ "confidence": 0.5456212162971497,
+ "start": 344,
+ "end": 346
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "socioeconomic blueprint",
+ "confidence": 0.9729457497596741,
+ "start": 338,
+ "end": 340
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Accountable Devolution Program",
+ "confidence": 0.7851956486701965,
+ "start": 443,
+ "end": 447
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5231364965438843,
+ "start": 481,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Conflict and Violence Prevention Training",
+ "confidence": 0.6767842769622803,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6558076739311218,
+ "start": 633,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "participants",
+ "confidence": 0.7128953337669373,
+ "start": 573,
+ "end": 574
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "KSG",
+ "confidence": 0.616012692451477,
+ "start": 582,
+ "end": 583
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5495876669883728,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "participants",
+ "confidence": 0.618858814239502,
+ "start": 573,
+ "end": 574
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "survey/training",
+ "confidence": 0.7403804063796997,
+ "start": 633,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6104820966720581,
+ "start": 633,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.6086330413818359,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Kenya Devolution Support Program",
+ "confidence": 0.6315038800239563,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.5562285780906677,
+ "start": 652,
+ "end": 653
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment and plans",
+ "confidence": 0.7913810014724731,
+ "start": 810,
+ "end": 813
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "KDSP",
+ "confidence": 0.7501837015151978,
+ "start": 818,
+ "end": 819
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 79
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n**Overall Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n1. The DRDIP II in Kenya applies a CDD approach ensuring effective harmonization with the Regional\nPastoral Livelihoods Resilience Project, the National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project, and\nthe Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project which are also using participatory approaches. At the county\nlevel, these projects will coordinate with each other beforehand to plan their scope based on existing\ninvolvement in a specific targeted community. CDPs generated through other projects will be used as a\nresource for prioritization of new investments.\n\n\n**Community‐level Implementation**\n\n\n2. During the first stage of project implementation, the project teams and communities targeted for\nproject investments will undergo extensive mandatory capacity building on community participatory\nplanning and interlinked safeguards processes (which will be elaborated in the PIM). Care will be taken to\nensure that activities are well coordinated and form synergies with other development programs,\nespecially those that form part of the NEDI and the World Bank projects that are already active in the\nproject area, namely the National Agricultural and Rural Inclusive Growth Project (Turkana) and the\nRegional Pastoral Livelihoods Resilience Project (all the DRDIP II project counties in Kenya). The proposed\ninterventions will also contribute to the respective CIDP and the National Medium‐Term Plan and form\npart of the county annual development plans to ensure that measures are taken that will result in project\nsustainability. The project will also promote reflection and learning within the project and ensure that\nlessons are disseminated to other government departments and development partners.\n\n\n_Participatory Process_\n\n\n3. For the project to be responsive to the needs of the targeted project beneficiaries and also to\nmake targeted communities aware of the project’s services, both tangible and intangible, there is need to\nimplement a participatory project stakeholder sensitization and mobilization plan which includes the\nfollowing:\n\n\n - Before entry into the community, the CIPIU undertakes a workshop with key stakeholders\nto collect secondary data about the community living in each of the villages.\n\n - The stakeholders to be engaged include youth and women’s groups, professional\nassociations, faith‐based organizations, CBOs, NGOs, marketing groups, farmer\norganizations, resource users’ associations, and others undertaking work within the project\nscope area.\n\n - The CIPIU will then make initial contact with the administrative structures to inform them of\nthe project activities.\n\n\nPage 78 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 80
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n - The administrative structure includes the County Commissioner, ward representative,\nDeputy Commissioner, Chief, County Governor, and the relevant County Executives within\nthe county.\n\n - Further engagements with the relevant departments is essential toward helping identify\nstakeholders involved in development within the project scope.\n\n - Community forums/ _barazas_ are conducted to inform the community about the project\nobjectives and activities to build confidence, trust, and acceptance by the community.\n\n - A multisectoral team, which will facilitate a participatory planning process, is formed with\ncommunity members including vulnerable women, youth, and other social groupings to\nidentify community priorities for social and economic investments, livelihood enhancement,\nand sustainable environmental management.\n\n - The community action plans should be shared with other government departments,\nprojects, and development partners for consideration in other processes.\n\n\n4. The proposed arrangement will include the engagement with existing community structures at\nthe village level complemented with support for enhancing the voice of the traditionally marginalized\nsocial groups for identifying community priorities for service delivery, prepare subproject proposals\nfollowing the operational guidelines, implement the approved subprojects, and keep required records in\na transparent way (details in Figure 3.1).\n\n\n**Figure 3.1. Proposed Implementation Arrangements at the Village and Ward Level**\n\n\nPage 79 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 81
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n5. In view of this, a VLC will be formed to coordinate village level plans. The VLC will be a five‐member\ncommittee selected by the village assembly including women, youth and the differently abled as\nrepresentatives. Two representatives (one man and one woman) from each VLC will be selected to form\na WLC for coordination and prioritization of subprojects for inclusion in work plan at the Ward level. A five\nmember Social Audit Committee (SAC) will be selected by the Village Assembly to undertake audit of\nproject investments and report to village assembly on quarterly basis.\n\n\n**Alignment with County Priorities**\n\n\n6. Through its CIPIU, the project at the counties will align identified priorities with the respective\nCIDP to ensure that the project complements county investments and ensures integration in the annual\ndevelopment plan for coordination. The project will support feasibility studies under the leadership of the\ncounty to assess the viability and the cost‐benefit analysis of these subprojects. If viable, the DRDIP II team\nwill proceed with the designing of the investment, followed by the mandatory safeguards studies\naccording to the requirements of the GoK and World Bank procedures.\n\n\n7. **Summary of sequence of events for subproject investments.** The sequence of events for\nimplementation of subprojects generally follow the following 10 steps:\n\n\n - Identification and mapping of existing resources and services for a gap analysis\n\n - Identification of candidate subprojects (through community participation)\n\n - In‐county stakeholder consultations to confirm subprojects (with community participation\nthrough the CDP process)\n\n - Feasibility studies and design of the subprojects\n\n - Screening appropriate safeguards of the subprojects\n\n - Development of safeguard instruments (for example, the Environmental and Social Impact\nAssessment, Resettlement Action Plan, Social Management Plans, Environmental Impact\nAssessment, Environmental Management Plan) (if established as necessary by the\nscreening)\n\n - Procurement of subproject\n\n - Implementation, including construction\n\n - Operation and maintenance\n\n\n**County‐Level Implementation**\n\n\n8. A County Integrated Project Implementation Unit (CIPIU) will facilitate subprojects preparation\nfollowing established protocols, provide oversight during the implementation of community subprojects\nincluding compliance with environmental and social safeguards, and report implementation progress and\nconsolidated expenditures. The CIPIU will be headed by a dedicated County Project coordinator, assisted\nby the County Project Focal Point, and supported by the County staff as well as appropriate consultants\nas required for the effective implementation support and monitoring. The CIPIU will also ensure effective\ncoordination of project activities with other operations supported by the World Bank and other\ndevelopment partners with the County Integrated Development Plan.\n\n\nPage 80 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 82
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n9. A County Technical Committee (CTC) with representation from line Ministries and county\ndepartments covering Water and Irrigation, Agriculture, Environment, Education, Health, Livestock,\nFisheries (where relevant) will be formed for the technical appraisal of the sub‐projects at the County\nlevel. Additionally, a County Steering Committee (CSC) will be established for the approval of annual work\nplan and budgets. The CSC will be chaired by County Secretary and will be represented by a member from\nCounty Treasury, UNHCR representative, Independent expert, representative of National Project\nImplementation Unit (NPIU) and County Project Coordinator will function as Secretary. Figure 3.2 provides\nthe proposed implementation arrangements.\n\n\n**Figure 3.2. Proposed Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n10. The CIPIU team members as well as the community facilitation teams will be trained on the CDD\napproach and safeguards screening approaches. An appropriate team of the CIPIU and community\nfacilitators trained on CDD approach and safeguards screening approaches will then be mandated to take\nthe communities through the participatory and safeguard process for project investment identified and\nprioritized by the community.\n\n\n11. At the national level, a National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU) headed by a dedicated\nProject Coordinator has been established in the Department for Development of Arid and Semi‐Arid\nRegions under the Executive Office of the President to provide oversight and promote coordination for\nthe project. The NPIU is composed of sectoral experts, procurement specialist, financial management\nspecialist, social safeguards specialist, Environmental Safeguards Specialist and Monitoring and Evaluation\nSpecialist to provide broad for effective implementation support and monitoring. This NPIU is also\nresponsible for preparing relevant project manuals and reporting formats. The NPIU will also provide\noversight for social and environmental safeguards. Finally, it will be responsible for coordinating with the\nWorld Bank and other key stakeholders and provide timely updates on project performance, funds\nutilization and audits.\n\n\n12. A National Project Technical Committee (NTPC) will be established for review of annual work plan\nand mid‐year implementation progress. The NPIU will prepare consolidated annual work plans and\nbudgets based on inputs received from the three participating CIPIUs and NTPC will review these annual\nplans and budgets, and recommend release of funds to counties. The NTPC will be represented by\nPrincipal Secretaries of the Ministries of Water and Irrigation; Agriculture; Environment; Livestock;\n\n\nPage 81 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 83
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nFisheries; Health and Social Protection, as well as representatives of County Executive Committee from\nTurkana, Wajir and Garissa Counties.\n\n\n13. A National Project Steering Committee (NPSC) will be established for policy decisions, boarder\nproject oversight and approval of annual work plans and budget. The NPSC will be Chaired by the Chief of\nstaff and Head of Public Services; Executive office of the President or his/her nominee; Governors of\nTurkana, Wajir and Garissa Counties or their nominees, representative from National Treasury,\nindependent expert (as required), UNHCR Country representative and the national project coordinator as\nMember Secretary. The NPSC will approve annual work plans and budgets and ensure effective\ncoordination between counties and different line departments of the National Government.\n\n\n14. The functions of the NPSC will include the following:\n\n\n - Review and approve annual work plans and budgets\n\n\n - Monitor implementation progress and reporting\n\n\n - Oversee biannual joint review and implementation support missions\n\n\n - Recommend implementation and promotion of identified best practices and policies\n\n\n**Coordination with the NEDI**\n\n\n_National Level_\n\n\n15. At the national level, an appropriate institutional arrangement is proposed to promote\ncoordination among all operations under the NEDI. The DRDIP II will collaborate with all World Bank‐\nfunded projects in the NEDI counties (mentioned above) to exchange updates and lessons learned on the\nindividual projects and ensure coordination and synergies.\n\n\n_Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for the IGAD Implemented Component 5_\n\n\n16. The IGAD component will be implemented by the existing IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM\nestablished under DRDIP Phase I (P152822) which is part of the Health and Social Development\nDepartment based at the IGAD Secretariat in Djibouti (Figure 3.3). This grant became effective on July 20,\n2016. The secretariat operates with a senior program coordinator, accountant, finance officer, and\nprocurement officer; recruitment for the M&E and knowledge expert and the Forced Displacement expert\nare both ongoing. For the IGAD component, the Regional Secretariat on FDMM will undertake project\nmanagement, day‐to‐day planning, implementation and supervision of project activities, administration\nof procurement and financial management (FM), and M&E. Under the IGAD grant, the Regional\nSecretariat on FDMM will augment capacity with the recruitment of a dedicated project officer for the\nexpanded mandate as well as a GIS expert. In general, the institutional and implementation arrangements\nof this existing DRDIP Phase I will be applicable for this project in implementing Component 5. No\nresources are envisaged to be disbursed or transferred to implementing entities other than the IGAD and\nthe Regional Secretariat on FDMM.\n\n\nPage 82 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 84
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Figure 3.3. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for IGAD**\n\n\n17. The FDMM Regional Secretariat is based both in Djibouti, where the IGAD headquarters is located,\nand in Nairobi. The overall fiduciary responsibilities will be with the IGAD finance and administration in\nDjibouti with a secretariat support office in Nairobi staffed with operations, procurement, and accounts\nspecialists (Figure 3.4).\n\n\n**Figure 3.4. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement for the Regional Secretariat**\n\n\n**Financial Management**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n\n\n18. **Planning and budgeting.** Budgeting will follow GoK budgeting procedures. Budget formulation\nfor DRDIP II is being done by involvement of the specialists/focal points from the relevant ministries who\nare positioned in the PIU to support project implementation. These specialists are component leads who\nare in charge of the activities like agriculture, health etc. A project‐coordinator has been selected to\n\n\nPage 83 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7296063303947449,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.5496808290481567,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.6192963123321533,
+ "start": 147,
+ "end": 149
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 85
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nconsolidate the budget. After the budget is consolidated, the budget is forwarded to the accounting\nofficer through the project manager. It is submitted to National Treasury for inclusion in the printed\nestimates.\n\n\n19. **Execution and Monitoring. T** he project will have a finance officer seconded from National\nTreasury to assist the project with budgeting. He will work closely with budget officers in the Cabinet\nAffairs department of the Office of the president. The quarterly Financial Monitoring Reports will be used\nfor monitoring budget execution together with the GoK vote book management system. The budget\nofficer is expected to create sub heads in IFMIS corresponding to the project components to facilitate\nmonitoring in IFMIS.\n\n\n**Accounting Arrangements**\n\n\n20. **Staffing.** A well‐qualified accountant has been seconded to the project. As the project progresses,\nthe PIU will assess whether there will be need for a second accountant.\n\n\n21. Accountants at CIPIU will be selected on the basis of ToRs prepared by the NPIU and cleared by\nthe World Bank. The project accountants will be trained on World Bank financial management procedures.\nThe training will be organized by the FMS for the project once the project is approved by the Board.\n\n\n22. **Financial Management Manual.** In addition to the GoK PFM regulations and procedures, 2015\nproject Financial Management Manual will be prepared as part of the Project Implementation Manual\nbefore project effectiveness.\n\n\n23. **Accounting Information System.** The project will use the Government Integrated Financial\nManagement Information system (IFMIS) as well as maintain manual cashbooks, which will run parallel to\nthe IFMIS records. The Project will maintain segregated manual cashbooks complemented by customized\nMicrosoft Excel spreadsheets for recording expenditure incurred at the national level through OP.\nSimilarly, the Project will maintain separate cashbooks in each of the three counties for recording\nexpenditure incurred at the county level. The NPIU shall be responsible for designing and operating a\nfinancial management and accounting information system that shall be used in guiding the CIPIU in\nfulfilling their financial management obligations. Details of this should be included in the project financial\nmanagement manual.\n\n\n24. **Internal Controls and Internal Audit.** The Executive Office of the President, Cabinet Affairs Office\nwhere the implementing department (Development of Arid and Semi‐arid Regions) is domiciled,\nmaintains elaborate internal control arrangements in line with government financial regulations and\nprocedures. These include procedures for approval and authorization of payments including imprest,\nproper segregation of functions, and internal check mechanisms. The payment processing system for the\nproject at the national level will be mainstreamed within OP’s accounting system, which has adequate\ncontrols. The three implementing counties will also be required to maintain elaborate internal control\narrangements in line with the County PFM regulations 2015 as well as the project FM manual that will be\nprepared.\n\n\n25. Any specific procedures relating to the project will be detailed in the project Financial\nManagement Manual that will be prepared as part of the PIM.\n\n\nPage 84 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly Financial Monitoring Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9710685610771179,
+ "start": 109,
+ "end": 113
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "monitoring budget execution",
+ "confidence": 0.9228739142417908,
+ "start": 117,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "GoK vote book management system",
+ "confidence": 0.7857561707496643,
+ "start": 123,
+ "end": 128
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "system",
+ "confidence": 0.5386484265327454,
+ "start": 127,
+ "end": 128
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFMIS",
+ "confidence": 0.8844689726829529,
+ "start": 139,
+ "end": 140
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "system",
+ "confidence": 0.5167121887207031,
+ "start": 127,
+ "end": 128
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ToRs",
+ "confidence": 0.6316561698913574,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 209
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "NPIU",
+ "confidence": 0.6460744738578796,
+ "start": 212,
+ "end": 213
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "project accountants",
+ "confidence": 0.6844156980514526,
+ "start": 221,
+ "end": 223
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Government Integrated Financial\nManagement Information system",
+ "confidence": 0.984003484249115,
+ "start": 307,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "system",
+ "confidence": 0.5986286997795105,
+ "start": 394,
+ "end": 395
+ },
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "IFMIS",
+ "confidence": 0.9775382876396179,
+ "start": 314,
+ "end": 315
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "payment processing system",
+ "confidence": 0.925710916519165,
+ "start": 499,
+ "end": 502
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "procedures for approval and authorization of payments",
+ "confidence": 0.6830264329910278,
+ "start": 478,
+ "end": 485
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 86
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n26. **Internal Audit and Audit Committee.** The NPIU will ensure that there is an internal auditor\ndeployed to the project. The National Treasury has seconded internal auditors to the Cabinet Affairs\ndepartment of OP. There are three internal auditors in this department who are qualified and have\nadequate experience in Internal Audit. The Head of Internal Audit will include the project in his annual\nwork plan and conduct quarterly audits as he has been doing for the other units in the Cabinet Affairs\ndepartment.\n\n\n27. The internal auditors do not do pre‐audits which is commendable as it ensures that their\nindependence is not impaired.\n\n\n28. The OP should have one audit committee for the entire OP (all the departments). Right now, the\naudit committee is not operational. Advertisements and shortlisting have been done. The deadline for\nputting in place an audit committee was January 28, 2017 per the PFM guidelines.\n\n\n29. **Funds flow and disbursement arrangements.** The core principles guiding the funds flow\narrangement are ensuring predictability and strong accountability. At the national level, the funds will\ndirectly flow from IDA to the NPIU U.S. dollar Designated Account at the Central Bank of Kenya managed\nby the NT to the NPIU KES project account at the Central Bank of Kenya (Figure 3.5). Details of operating\nthe KES project account will be provided in the PIM. Transfers can be made to county project accounts\nbased on fund requests initially supported by a work plan and subsequently on a replenishment basis.\nHowever, this transfer will only happen when CIPIUs have been established in the respective Targeted\nCounties with adequate resources, and staff with experience and training and under terms of reference\nsatisfactory to the Association. For the community subprojects, funds will directly flow from the county\nproject account to the subproject accounts at the community level. For the larger works, direct payments\nwill be made to the respective contractor selected competitively.\n\n\n30. Based on lessons learned from the past CDD projects, a Statement of Expenditure‐based\ndisbursement approach will be used. The initial disbursement will be based on a three months’\nconsolidated annual work plan approved by the NPSC which will have county presentation. Subsequently,\nthe replenishment will be done to the Designated Account upon submitting withdrawal applications for\neligible expenditures for the period. The SOE can be submitted on a monthly basis.\n\n\n31. The disbursement letter will detail out the other disbursement methods available under this\nproject.\n\n\n32. **Financial reporting arrangements.** The NPIU will prepare and submit quarterly IFRs and annual\nproject financial statements to the World Bank. The quarterly IFR will be submitted to the World Bank\nwithin 45 days after the end of the quarter to which it is related. Each participating county will send the\nIFR of the county to NPIU within 30 days after the end of the quarter to enable consolidation at NPIU and\nsubmission to the World Bank within 45 days after the end of the quarter. The format of the IFR was\nagreed with the NPIU.\n\n\nPage 85 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 87
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Figure 3.5. Kenya Fund Flow Arrangements**\n\n\n33. The annual audited project financial statements will be prepared on the basis of International\nPublic Sector Accounting Standards and submitted to the Office of the Auditor General for audit within\nthree months of the end of the financial year. The audited financial statement and the management letter\nwill be submitted to the World Bank six months after the end of the financial year (Table 3.1).\n\n\n34. **External auditing arrangements.** The Office of the Auditor General is mandated by the\nconstitution of Kenya to audit all public funds. Hence, the Office of the Auditor General will be responsible\nfor the audit of the DRDIP II. The NPIU will keep the books of accounts and prepare the accounts for audit.\nThe OAG may contract private audit firms acceptable to the World Bank to conduct part or entire project\naudit on their behalf.\n\n\n**Table 3.1. Audit Arrangements for Kenya**\n\n|Audit Report|Due Date|\n|---|---|\n|DRDIP II annual audited financial statement and
management letter for the project (including
reconciliations of the Designated Accounts with
appropriate notes and disclosures and management
letter responses).|Within six months after the end of each
fiscal/financial year.|\n\n\n\n35. **Conclusion and supervision plan.** Some aspects of project’s financial management arrangements\nrequire improvements in order for the systems to be adequate to provide, with reasonable assurance,\naccurate and timely information on the project’s status as required by IDA (Table 3.2). The residual FM\nrisk is assessed as **high** requiring World Bank supervision twice a year. FM supervision will be consistent\nwith a risk‐based approach and will involve a collaborative approach with the task team, including\nLoans/disbursement and procurement staff. This would cover all aspects of FM. Additional supervision\n\n\nPage 86 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 88
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nactivities will include desk review of quarterly IFRs and internal audit reports, audited financial statements\nand management letters as well as timely follow up of issues arising, and updating the financial\nmanagement rating in the implementation status reports and the portfolio and risk management system.\n\n\n**Table 3.2. Financial Management Action Plan**\n\n|Col1|Action|Responsibility|Due Date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Prepare an FM project procedures manual as part of
the PIM|OP, NPIU|Three months of
effectiveness|\n|2|Deploy/Designate an financial management specialist
for the three CIPIUs|Counties‐Wajir,
Garissa, Turkana|Three months of
effectiveness|\n|3|The project accountants be trained on World Bank
financial management procedures|WB|During
implementation|\n|4|Internal audit to audit the project activities|OP, Cabinet Affairs|During
Implementation|\n|5|Constitute the Audit Committee|OP|During
Implementation|\n\n\n\n**IGAD**\n\n\n36. An FM assessment was conducted on the FM arrangements for this project according to the FM\nmanual issued in March 1, 2010, and re‐issued in February 2015. The assessment relied on the FM\nassessment conducted for the existing IGAD‐implemented DRDIP Phase I (P152822) and lessons and\nexperiences learned during implementation of this project including FM supervision mission reports, audit\nreports, and IFRs reviews of the existing and other projects implemented by the IGAD. This project will\nuse the FM arrangements created by the existing DRIDP Phase I project. The objective of the assessment\nwas to determine whether the IGAD secretariat has acceptable FM arrangements in place that satisfy the\nWorld Bank’s OP/BP 10.00. These arrangements will ensure that the implementing entities (a) use project\nfunds only for the intended purposes in an efficient and economical way; (b) prepare accurate and reliable\naccounts as well as timely periodic financial reports; (c) safeguard the assets of the project; and (d) have\nacceptable auditing arrangements.\n\n\n37. Component 5 (IGAD component) will be implemented by the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat,\nwhich was established under the existing active grant to the IGAD under the DRDIP Phase I (P152822). The\nsame FM arrangements designed for this grant under P152822 will continue to be applicable in\nimplementing Component 5 of this project. The IGAD Secretariat will be responsible for maintaining\nsatisfactory FM arrangements throughout the life of the project for this component. No funds will be\ntransferred to any other implementing entity other than the IGAD Secretariat and its regional secretariat\non FDMM office. Should this arrangement change and if there is a requirement to disburse monies to\nother implementing entities, then an FM assessment will be conducted on entities receiving resources.\n\n\n38. The IGAD regional secretariat on FDMM will prepare annual budgets based on their work plans\nand, thereafter, submit them to the World Bank at least two months before the beginning of the project’s\nfiscal year. The budgets will follow budgeting guidelines of the IGAD Secretariat. Budgets should be\napproved before the financial year they relate to begins. During the financial year, budgets will be\nmonitored on a quarterly basis using IFRs. The IFRs will compare the budget and actual expenditure and\nsignificant variances will need to be explained.\n\n\nPage 87 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.7791486978530884,
+ "start": 30,
+ "end": 32
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9274451732635498,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "implementation status reports",
+ "confidence": 0.5107542872428894,
+ "start": 61,
+ "end": 64
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM supervision mission reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9687745571136475,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.7066712379455566,
+ "start": 245,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8238295912742615,
+ "start": 280,
+ "end": 281
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit\nreports",
+ "confidence": 0.7291108965873718,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.7464326024055481,
+ "start": 245,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7016172409057617,
+ "start": 280,
+ "end": 281
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs reviews",
+ "confidence": 0.5959181785583496,
+ "start": 322,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "IGAD",
+ "confidence": 0.7361442446708679,
+ "start": 245,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.7157275676727295,
+ "start": 280,
+ "end": 281
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9674657583236694,
+ "start": 571,
+ "end": 573
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "entities receiving resources",
+ "confidence": 0.7357658743858337,
+ "start": 577,
+ "end": 580
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.9889729619026184,
+ "start": 661,
+ "end": 662
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "compare the budget and actual expenditure",
+ "confidence": 0.5048249363899231,
+ "start": 666,
+ "end": 672
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "financial year",
+ "confidence": 0.7083605527877808,
+ "start": 640,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 89
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n39. Accounting policies and procedures of the IGAD Secretariat were considered to be adequate and\nwill continue to be applicable for this project. In addition, the IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM\nsupported by the existing DRDIP Phase I (P152822) developed a PIM which is applicable for this project as\nwell. There is adequate FM staffing at the IGAD secretariat and its Regional Secretariat on FDMM and\nthese staff will handle Component 5 of this project. The existing accounting system (SUN Accounting\nsystem) will continue to be used for this project. The IGAD Secretariat will continue to prepare the project\naccounts of this project in a modified cash basis of accounting. Internal control procedures of the IGAD\nSecretariat and its Regional Secretariat on FDMM as documented in the PIM and the IGAD financial rules\nand regulations will be applicable for this project. The IGAD secretariat has an adequate internal audit unit\nand it will include the project under its audit plan and will conduct regular audits on the project to ensure\nthat funds are being utilized for purposes intended.\n\n\n40. With regard to financial reporting, the IGAD secretariat prepares and submits to IDA quarterly\nunaudited IFRs for the existing project—DRDIP Phase I (P152822)—within 45 days after the end of the\nquarter to which they relate. The IFR format and content has been agreed during the existing DRDIP\n(P152822) project negotiation. This existing IFR format will be used and will include the transactions of\nthis project. Its form and content was reviewed, revised, and agreed. The quarterly IFR will continue to be\nsubmitted within 45 days of the end of the quarter. The financial reporting arrangement for the project is\nin Figure 3.6.\n\n\n41. This project will be audited annually by an external auditor acceptable to the World Bank. Audit\nshould be carried out in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. It is expected that this\nproject audit will be coordinated with the existing DRDIP Phase I (P152822) project. Audit terms of\nreference were agreed. Audit reports together with management letters should be submitted to the\nWorld Bank within six months of the end of each fiscal year after effectiveness. The project will recruit\nwithin six months after effectiveness an external auditor acceptable to the World Bank. Audit reports will\nbe publically disclosed by the World Bank in accordance with the World Bank Access to Information Policy.\n\n\n**Figure 3.6. IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM financial reporting arrangement**\n\n\n**Disbursements**\n\n\n42. **Kenya.** Based on lessons learned from the past CDD projects, a Statement of Expenditure‐based\ndisbursement approach will be used. The initial disbursement will be based on a three months’\nconsolidated annual work plan approved by the NPSC which will have county presentation. Subsequently,\n\n\nPage 88 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 90
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nthe replenishment will be done to the Designated Account upon submitting withdrawal applications for\neligible expenditures for the period. The SOE can be submitted on a monthly basis.\n\n\n43. **IGAD.** Disbursement arrangements envisaged under the existing IGAD DRDIP Phase I (P152822)\nwill continue to be applicable for this project as well. The IGAD secretariat will open a Designated Account\nin Djibouti at a commercial bank acceptable to IDA (details in Figure 3.7).\n\n\n**Figure 3.7. Funds flow arrangement**\n\n\n44. The Designated Account will be denominated in U.S. dollars. The IGAD Regional Secretariat on\nFDMM will also open a project account denominated in local currency and USD at a commercial bank\nacceptable to IDA in Nairobi. The IGAD Secretariat and IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM will continue\nto use the transaction‐based method of disbursements (Statements of Expenditure) for this project. All\ndisbursement methods will continue to be applicable. Details are stated in the disbursement letter and\ndisbursement handbook.\n\n\n**Procurement**\n\n\n45. **Kenya** . Procurement for the project will be carried out in accordance with the “The World Bank\nProcurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers, July 2016”, hereafter referred to as ‘Procurement\nRegulations’. The project will also be subject to the World Bank’s Anti‐corruption Guidelines, dated July\n1, 2016.\n\n\n46. As required by the Procurement Regulations, a Project Procurement Strategy for Development\n(PPSD) has been developed on the basis of which the Procurement Plan has been prepared setting out\nthe selection methods to be followed by the Borrower during project implementation in the procurement\n\n\nPage 89 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 91
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nof goods, works, and non‐consulting and consulting services financed by the World Bank. The\nProcurement Plan is part of the PPSD. The Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as\nrequired to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.\n\n\n_**Summary of PPSD**_\n\n\nThe Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve access to basic social services, expand\neconomic opportunities, and enhance environmental management for communities hosting refugees\nin the target areas.\n\n\nIn line with the regional project, the Kenya DRDIP will ensure that citizens participate and are actively\nengaged during various phases of implementation from the planning stage to enhance the\nbelongingness, ownership, and sustainability of the subprojects. The approach adopted for\nimplementation is CDD. The project will be implemented in three target areas of Garissa, Turkana, and\nWajir affected by refugee presence and is a complex operating environment with security risks and a\nmultitude of public, private, and NGO sector agencies operating in the humanitarian and development\narena, at various levels.\n\n\nThe procurement under Components 1(b), 3(b), and 4 shall be carried out by the National Project\nImplementation Unit (NPIU) that has been established at the Executive Officer of the President. No\nprocurement is envisaged at county or sub‐county levels. Procurement under other components shall\ntake place at community level. The PPSD focuses on Component 1 (b), 3 (b) and 4 as these components\ncomprise of _**strategic core**_ and _**strategic critical**_ procurement transactions in terms of procurement risk\nand the estimated cost. The investment components 1(a), 2, 3(a) will be implemented by the local\ncommunities following community procurement procedures as outlined in CDD guidance note\npublished by the World Bank and detailed in the operation manual. Most of the subprojects are\ndisaggregated by type of service and target group, and are considered as _**tactical acquisition**_\nprocurement transactions in terms of procurement risk and estimated cost. The subprojects are of low\nvalue and low risk. The operations manual outlines the procurement arrangements for low value, low\nrisk activities.\n\n\nBased on the project requirements, technical solutions and market base, procurement strategy has\nbeen developed to go for separate packages (target area wise) and for Open international competition.\nThe suppliers’ base for each of the above segments are distinct with different skills and risks. The\nselection of various consultancy services will be the critical procurement activities for the project. Based\non the broad market assessment, there are potential service providers in the region for providing\nservices required for the project. The project related requirements for Goods (both domestic and\nimported), Works, Services, Non‐consultancy services can be procured from the domestic market.\nThere are potential providers to supply the goods, construct required works, and provide consultancy\nservices. The providers are keen to do business with the Government. For community support, Kenya\nhave a large pool of NGOs operating in the project area.\n\n\nTo monitor the progress of the subprojects, ensure smooth coordination between different agencies\nand resolve issues that may arise during implementation stage, a multi‐tiered institutional monitoring\nmechanism will be set‐up using Project Management Information Systems (PMIS) and Facilitating\nAgencies (FA) in target areas. Inadequate procurement capacity, especially at local levels, could result\nin noncompliance and therefore capacity enhancement, regular oversight with the help of monitoring\nagencies, using robust centralized PMIS with geospatial tagging (the progress is also uploaded with\n\n\nPage 90 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 92
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ngeotagged photographs, biometric record of participation in physical labor), and periodic audits\nthrough Independent Integrated Fiduciary and Accountability Review Agency will be required to\nenhance the efficiency and transparency during implementation.\n\n\nThe PPSD further advises the establishment of a database of subprojects, micro projects, and income\ngeneration activities for the benefit of communities and knowledge sharing.\n\n\nThe Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) in Eastern Africa has established a\nprocurement unit at FDMM Regional Secretariat, Nairobi. The Procurement Unit, will be responsible\nfor the implementation of activities that support the IGAD component. The procurement activities\nenvisaged includes low value, low risk contracts for Goods and Consultant Services and Technical\nAssistance all of which would be sourced from the domestic market. Although IGAD has experience in\nimplementing World Bank funded projects before, to augment the procurement capacity there will be\nneed to hire an additional procurement staff at the secretariat.\n\n\n47. _**Systematic Tracking of Exchanges in Procurement (STEP):**_ The project will use STEP, a planning\nand tracking system, which would provide data on procurement activities, establish benchmarks, monitor\ndelays and measure procurement performance.\n\n\n48. _**Procurement risk assessment:**_ A procurement capacity and risk assessment has been carried out\nby the World Bank for the NPIU at the Executive Office of the President and IGAD Regional Secretariat\noffice in Nairobi who will be responsible for implementing the project at the National and Regional levels\nto review the organizational structure for implementing the project and the interaction between the\nproject’s staff responsible for procurement. The assessment has been fed into the Procurement Risk\nAssessment and Management System (PRAMS). Based on the assessment and taking note of the roles and\nresponsibilities of the line ministries in carrying out procurement, the existing procurement capacity\nwithin the agencies and at community level, and the risks associated with CDD operations the\nprocurement risk rating is considered “ **High** ”.\n\n\n49. The key issues and risks concerning procurement for implementation of the project which include\nsystemic weaknesses in the areas of: (i) procurement capacity at national and community level; (ii)\naccountability of procurement decisions especially at community level; (iii) Procurement delays in\nbid/proposal evaluation and signing of contracts; (iv) procurement record keeping; (v) capacity of\nprocurement staff; (vi) procurement planning; (vii) procurement process administration, up to and\nincluding award of contracts; (viii) contract management; and (ix) procurement oversight.\n\n\n50. Preliminary Risk mitigation measures based on the discussion and assessment include: (i) use of\nNGOs as facilitating agencies at the community level and deployment of competent procurement staff at\nthe NPIU; (ii) Procurement capacity building at community level; and (iii) training new and current staff in\nWorld Bank procurement regulations.\n\n\n51. _**Use of National Procurement Procedures**_ **:** All contracts following national market approach shall\nfollow the procedures set out in the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act of 2015 (PPADA). The\nPPADA governs purchase of works, goods and services using public resources by the national and county\ngovernment entities, local authorities, state corporations, education institutions, and other GoK\ninstitutions. Under the PPADA, the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) has been established,\nin addition to the Public Procurement Directorate in the National Treasury. The PPADA sets out the rules\n\n\nPage 91 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5223695039749146,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9638353586196899,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Tracking of Exchanges in Procurement",
+ "confidence": 0.973828136920929,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "planning\nand tracking system",
+ "confidence": 0.7555758357048035,
+ "start": 214,
+ "end": 218
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "STEP",
+ "confidence": 0.5437500476837158,
+ "start": 211,
+ "end": 212
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement risk assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8454349040985107,
+ "start": 242,
+ "end": 245
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "PRAMS",
+ "confidence": 0.8491765856742859,
+ "start": 330,
+ "end": 331
+ },
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.7213696837425232,
+ "start": 164,
+ "end": 166
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Risk\nAssessment and Management System",
+ "confidence": 0.9964588284492493,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 329
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "PRAMS",
+ "confidence": 0.9746631383895874,
+ "start": 330,
+ "end": 331
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "procurement record keeping",
+ "confidence": 0.9373654127120972,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PPADA",
+ "confidence": 0.5524129867553711,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 601
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 93
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nand procedures of public procurement and provides a mechanism for enforcement of the law. The new\nConstitution has devolved some of the key functions of the national government to the counties. In this\nrespect, the Government is expected to issue the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Regulations,\n2017 which will cover national, county government and SOEs. Procurement function is decentralized to\nindividual procuring entities. The PPRA has oversight and regulatory function including undertaking\nprocurement reviews and audits. There is a Public Procurement Administrative Review Board under the\nsecretariat of PPRA that deals with complaints received from bidders or consulting firms. The provisions\nof PPADA is consistent with the World Bank Procurement Regulations Section V – Para 5.4 National\nProcurement Procedures.\n\n\n52. _**Procurement of Works:**_ No major works are envisaged under the project\n\n\n53. **Procurement of Goods:** Goods to be procured under this Project will include among others, office\nand IT equipment, IT Software & Information Systems, Conferencing facilities, motor vehicles, motor\ncycles, and office furniture.\n\n\n54. While approaching international market procurement will be done using the World Bank’s\nStandard Procurement Documents (SPDs). Procurements while approaching national market will be done\nusing the National Standard Bidding Documents with appropriate modifications and additional annexes\nto address World Bank’s Anti‐corruption Guidelines and universal eligibility.\n\n\n55. _**Procurement of Consultancy Services:**_ Consulting services to be procured under the Project\ninclude community facilitating agencies, third party monitoring, grievances redress systems, monitoring\nand evaluation, environmental impact and social assessments, surveys, fiduciary audits, and technical\nassistance. Individual consultants and/or support personnel may also be hired to augment existing\ncapacity within the NPIU and line ministries in accordance with the provisions of Para 7.32 of Procurement\nRegulations.\n\n\n56. _**Community Driven Development:**_ The CDD approach and procurement by the communities will\nfollow Procurement Regulations paragraph 6.52 and Annex XII ‐ Selection Methods paragraph 6.9 and\n6.10. The procurement arrangement at community level and oversight mechanism such as citizen\nengagement, social audit and accountability will be detailed in the Project Operations Manual and in line\nwith ‘Guidance Note for Design and Management of Procurement Responsibilities in Community Driven\nDevelopment Projects’, dated March 15, 2012. The procurement arrangements shall be simple to enable\nthe communities to carry out their own procurement activities with little or no assistance from\nnational/county/sub‐county officials. The fiduciary assurance shall come from citizen engagement,\ndisclosure at community level, social audit, and use of women‐led procurement committees at community\nlevel.\n\n\n57. _**Operating Costs:**_ These items will be procured using the Borrower national procurement and\nadministrative procedures acceptable to the World Bank including selection of project implementation\nsupport personnel. The Borrower will also pay for costs associated with travel, accommodation, per‐\ndiems, office consumables and maintenance, motor vehicle maintenance, implementation support\npersonnel, etc.\n\n\nPage 92 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5444734692573547,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5624619126319885,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6147497892379761,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.8283191323280334,
+ "start": 75,
+ "end": 76
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Standard Procurement Documents",
+ "confidence": 0.5951756834983826,
+ "start": 238,
+ "end": 241
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.9228314757347107,
+ "start": 234,
+ "end": 236
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievances redress systems",
+ "confidence": 0.9541338086128235,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 312
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 94
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n58. _**Record keeping:**_ All records pertaining to award of tenders, including bid notification, register\npertaining to sale and receipt of bids, bid opening minutes, bid evaluation reports and all correspondence\npertaining to bid evaluation, communication sent to/with the World Bank in the process, bid securities,\nand approval of invitation/evaluation of bids would be retained by respective Agencies and also uploaded\nin the STEP.\n\n\n59. _**Disclosure of procurement information**_ _._ The following documents shall be disclosed on the\nagencies websites: (a) Procurement Plan and updates; (b) an invitation for bids for goods and works for\nall contracts; (c) request for expression of interest for selection/hiring of consulting services; (d) contract\nawards for goods, works, non‐consulting and consulting services; (e) monthly financial and physical\nprogress report of all contracts; and (f) an action taken report on any complaints received on a quarterly\nbasis. Disclosure at community level will be made in social and public administrative areas easily accessible\nto the public and at project/activity sites. As part of citizen engagement, all civil works/subprojects will\nhave a notice board displaying subproject description, financial and physical progress.\n\n\n60. The following details shall also be published in the United Nations Development Business (UNDB)\nand World Bank’s external website: (a) an invitation for bids for procurement of goods and works\nfollowing open international market approaches; (b) Request for Expression of Interest for selection of\nconsulting services following open international market approaches; and (c) contract award details of all\nprocurement of goods and works and selection of consultants using open international market\napproaches.\n\n\n61. _**Fiduciary oversight by the World Bank**_ _:_ The World Bank shall prior review contracts as per prior\nreview thresholds set in the PPSD/PP.\n\n\n62. All contracts not covered under prior review by the World Bank shall be subject to post review\nduring implementation support missions and/or special post review missions, including missions by\nconsultants hired by the World Bank. However, the World Bank may conduct at any time, Independent\nProcurement Reviews (IPRs) of all the contracts financed under the credit and/or grant.\n\n\n63. _**Contract management.**_ The high risk and high value procurements will be identified for increased\ncontract management support and indicated in the procurement plan. The agencies will develop key\nperformance indicators (KPI) for such identified contracts and the KPIs would be monitored during actual\nexecution of contracts. World Bank team will provide additional due diligence and independent review of\nthe contract performance of such identified procurements. A fully staffed PIU of the respective agencies\nwill be responsible for overall project/contract management.\n\n\n64. _**Frequency of procurement supervision**_ _:_ Two half‐yearly missions are envisaged for procurement\nsupport and supervision of the proposed project.\n\n\n65. **At the IGAD**, procurement will be carried out by the procurement unit at the IGAD Regional\nSecretariat on FDMM. Oversight will be provided by the IGAD procurement unit in Djibouti which carries\nout the procurement activities for all projects executed by IGAD. The IGAD secretariat has experience in\nimplementing donor‐supported projects, including those financed by the World Bank.\n\n\nPage 93 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 95
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Environmental and Social (including safeguards)**\n\n\n66. The proposed project was screened by the World Bank Team and assigned the Environment\nAssessment category B. This is on the assumption that no major civil works will be funded and no major\nphysical or economic displacements will take place. The World Bank Operational Policy on Environmental\nAssessment (OP/BO 4.01) has been triggered, given that implementation of the activities outlined under\nComponents 1‐3 namely expansion and improvement of service delivery, including small‐scale\ninfrastructure; construction or rehabilitation of physical structures for soils and water conservation, and\nwater catchment management; other landscape restorative activities such as afforestation/reforestation,\neradication of noxious plant species; land‐based livelihood support activities; etc.; could result in\nenvironmental risks and social impacts, albeit these may be reversible, localized, and easily and cost‐\neffectively mitigated. The Operational Policy on Pest Management (OP/BP 4.09) has been triggered,\npredicated on the assumption that the project will support activities under Component 2 and 3 that are\nlikely to be agriculture‐based and that may increase the application of agrochemicals (insecticides,\nherbicides, fungicides and fertilizers).\n\n\n67. The Policy on Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) has been triggered as a precautionary\nmeasure. Although the project has no foreknowledge of any potential cultural and historical sites or\nresources of significance, it has incorporated “Chance Find” provisions in the ESMF to ensure that the\nappropriate preventive and mitigation measures are formulated and executed in the event that any such\nphysical cultural resources are encountered during project implementation. In addition, the Policy on\nSafety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) has been triggered under the assumption that Component 2 may support\nsmall dam construction as part of the small‐and micro‐scale irrigation schemes. To respond to\nrequirements under this Policy, the project will use the 2010 FAO “Manual on Small Earth Dams, A Guide\nto Siting, Design and Construction”. Given that specific sites for sub‐projects to be implemented through\na CDD approach are not yet known/identified, a framework approach was proposed by the World Bank\nSafeguard Team, and the Borrower has prepared an Environmental and Social Management Framework\n(ESMF). The Borrower has ensured that free, prior and informed consultations during the preparation of\nthe safeguard instruments, and the documentation of the stakeholder consultation and participation\nprocess. The report was cleared by the World Bank and disclosed in‐country and at the World Bank’s\nInfoShop on March 3, 2017.\n\n\n68. The Policy on International Waterway (OP/BP 7.50) has been triggered since the project will\nfinance bore holes for drinking water supply and small‐scale irrigation investments most likely to be\nlocated in international waterways of the Merti Aquifer. While the impact of these investments on the\nMerti Aquifer is likely to be insignificant and the cumulative abstraction minor, Riparian country of\nSomalia has been notified in accordance with the Operational Policy 7.50 on International Waterways. A\nresults memo was approved by the Regional Vice President.\n\n\n69. Among the key social issues for the project are (a) the issues relating to OP 4.10 for the Somali\nand Turkana communities and in‐depth consultations to meet policy requirements; (b) low economic and\nsocial empowerment of women and youth; (c) weak and/or weakened customary institutions; (d) conflict\nover natural resource use and livelihoods; and (e) Kenyans who are registered as refugees in the Dadaab\nrefugee camp who need to be rehabilitated following their screening in light of the GoK decision to close\nthe Dadaab refugee camp complex. An expanded SA was carried out for the project to explore these\naspects which informed the project design.\n\n\nPage 94 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 96
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n70. **OP 4.10 ‐ Indigenous Peoples.** The population in Garissa County is 98 percent Somali, according\nto the CIDP, but, internally, the Somalis identify themselves with clans, which is a key factor in\ndevelopment and in distribution of resources in the county, employment, and also leadership selection.\nThe clans found in the county are the Abudwaq, Aulihan, Abdalla, Muqabuul, Qare, and Dogodia. The\nthree main sub‐clans: the Aulidan, Abudwaq, and Muqabuul are from the Ogaden sub‐clan and from\ndiscussions in the field, there seem to be very little tension between them (other than during elections).\nThere are a few Bantu (Munyuyaya and Malakote) along the Tana River in Fafi subcounty.\n\n\n71. Around Kakuma, the host community is mainly Turkana with a few other groups that came to do\nbusiness there and look for jobs. There is some intermarriage between these groups and also between\nthe host community and refugees, with very little tension between them. There has, however, been\ntension in the past between pastoralist groups over natural resources. The determination of whether the\nTurkana fit the OP 4.10 criteria and the GoK’s definition of marginalized communities was explored during\nthe SA.\n\n\n72. All Somalis and Turkana fit the OP 4.10 criteria, however within this, there are some people within\nthis community, whose livelihoods are more ‘inextricably linked to the lands in which they live and the\nnatural resources on which they depend’, and may be excluded if special measures are not put in place.\nThese are outlined include groups such as remote nomadic pastoralists who may not be easily reached\ndue to the fact that are in remote areas with their herds. Other vulnerable and marginalised groups (as\nper the Constitutional definition) identified as part of the Social Assessment include: (i) the chronically\npoor; (ii) persons living with disabilities; (iii) street children; (iv) women, especially widowed and those in\nfemale‐headed households; (v) the youth; and (vi) those living far from the market centers, including\npastoralists. In Garissa, the Bahgari clan, whose members are still predominantly pastoral nomads, was\nconsidered more marginalized than the other sub‐clans. There was also an indication that those non‐\nOgadeni clan members residing in the host communities in Dadaab, Fafi and Wajir South tend to be\nmarginalized in decision‐making and have limited access to resources. Such people are not given\neducation bursaries and have no access to other local initiatives aimed at supporting the poor and\nvulnerable.\n\n\n73. **OP 4.12 ‐ Involuntary Resettlement.** The proposed project will not undertake any subprojects\nthat will displace people. However, individual subprojects are not yet identified. Therefore, as a\nprecautionary measure, the project has prepared, cleared and disclosed an RPF on March 3, 2017 to\naddress any issues which might arise from economic displacement and/or restriction of access to\ncommunal natural resources under the project. During implementation, special attention will be given to\ncommunity participation, grievance redress and benefit sharing mechanisms, and sociocultural\nsystems/physical characteristics that are specific to the project sites and surroundings to ensure that\nthose affected by implementation of the project, positively or negatively, have a voice and a mechanism\nof influencing project outcomes in line with World Bank safeguard policies.\n\n\n**Safeguards Process**\n\n\n74. Generally, the safeguard process for community investments follow the following steps:\n\n\n - Once an investment has been assessed as viable, it is screened for safeguards by the\nCIPMU at a screening meeting with the community, which also identifies the potential\n\n\nPage 95 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7427626252174377,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Garissa County",
+ "confidence": 0.8459171056747437,
+ "start": 41,
+ "end": 43
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somalis",
+ "confidence": 0.9658387303352356,
+ "start": 58,
+ "end": 59
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CIDP",
+ "confidence": 0.6893389225006104,
+ "start": 51,
+ "end": 52
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Garissa County",
+ "confidence": 0.575385332107544,
+ "start": 41,
+ "end": 43
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Somalis",
+ "confidence": 0.8234734535217285,
+ "start": 58,
+ "end": 59
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "OP 4.10 criteria",
+ "confidence": 0.9285466074943542,
+ "start": 245,
+ "end": 250
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "GoK",
+ "confidence": 0.7724061608314514,
+ "start": 252,
+ "end": 253
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Turkana",
+ "confidence": 0.8597949743270874,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Social Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9921894073486328,
+ "start": 374,
+ "end": 376
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable and marginalised groups",
+ "confidence": 0.6239781975746155,
+ "start": 358,
+ "end": 362
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RPF",
+ "confidence": 0.7876484990119934,
+ "start": 575,
+ "end": 576
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.8215598464012146,
+ "start": 580,
+ "end": 581
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 97
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nimpacts of the project to ensure that there is broad community agreement which is\ndocumented and the attendance list is signed.\n\n\n - If an investment is to take place on community land, a community resolution form is\nprepared showing that there is agreement on the project and that the process for\nconsultation has been followed by the county land ministry or community land registrar\n(previously the County Land Management Board).\n\n\n - Following positive screening, a report is submitted to National Environment Management\nAgency (NEMA) to determine whether an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment is\nrequired.\n\n\n - Screening is done for vulnerable groups in the targeted area and a Social Management Plan\n(SMP) is done to ensure the inclusion of VMGs and IPs in consultations and ensure that\nthey receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits and adverse effects are\navoided, minimized, mitigated or compensated.\n\n\n - The screening reports, SMPs, and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments are then\nsubmitted to the World Bank for clearance.\n\n\n - In the case of pesticide use (for example, livestock vaccination), a generic integrated pest\nmanagement plan has been prepared which is adapted for each county before execution\nof such activities.\n\n\n**Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n75. The proposed project will be implemented at the community level with necessary oversight and\ntechnical support at the national, subnational, and local levels. M&E capacities will be ensured at the\nnational, subnational, and local levels for the collection, organization, and analysis of project‐related data.\nThe main instrument for M&E under the project will be the Results Framework, with indicators and the\nbaseline, intermediate, and end‐of‐project targets, which will be the basis for reporting progress. The\nindicators, data sources, and data collection methods take into account the CDD approach and the limited\ninstitutional capacities in the project‐targeted areas. All indicators are disaggregated by country, with\nfurther disaggregation by gender (percent female) for the core indicator on direct project beneficiaries.\n\n\n**Role of Partners (if applicable)**\n\n\n76. Project preparation involved close collaboration with UNHCR alongside the GoK to design the\nappropriate responses to the social, economic, and environmental situation and impacts in the refugee‐\nhosting areas and to design a project appropriate to address these impacts. Project preparation has also\ninvolved intense consultations with all development partners active on forced displacement issues in\nKenya and various NGOs working in the project target areas. Importantly, because UNHCR will be leading\nthe process of return and reintegration process of Somali refugees, will continue to support refugees in\nKakuma, and will undertake the screening of locals registered as refugees, coordination between the\nWorld Bank team and UNHCR will be critical in determining project implementation. Considering the\nimportance of an areas‐based development approach, some of the partners have shown keen interest to\n\n\nPage 96 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental and Social Impact Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.693171501159668,
+ "start": 120,
+ "end": 125
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "screening reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9818234443664551,
+ "start": 184,
+ "end": 186
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6130430102348328,
+ "start": 105,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6665565967559814,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable groups",
+ "confidence": 0.5047813653945923,
+ "start": 133,
+ "end": 135
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental and Social Impact Assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.5729267001152039,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 195
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Results Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.8616206645965576,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 321
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.506859540939331,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "project‐targeted areas",
+ "confidence": 0.5704202651977539,
+ "start": 370,
+ "end": 374
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 98
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nsupport a World Bank‐administered MDTF for providing additional technical assistance and bringing in\nglobal expertise. The task team is pursuing this during the preparation.\n\n\nPage 97 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 99
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n**Strategy and Approach for Implementation Support**\n\n\n1. The strategy for supporting project implementation will focus on successfully mitigating the risks\nidentified at various levels and supporting the risk management proposed in the Systematic Operations\nRisk‐Rating Tool (SORT). It will consist of (a) implementation support missions and (b) technical assistance\nin areas of weaknesses and where innovations are introduced.\n\n\n**Implementation Support Plan and Resource Requirements**\n\n\n2. Arrangements made at the preparation phase will be maintained during implementation support\ninvolving the regional Task Team Leader based in Washington and co‐Task Team Leaders based in‐country.\nThis arrangement will enhance interaction with the participating countries and improve monitoring of\nprogress. The Association is also seeking a possible trust fund budget to strengthen supervision activities\non top of the Association’s budget.\n\n\n3. The Implementation Support Plan will comprise a number of critical review instruments to assess\nprogress toward achieving the PDO and overall implementation progress and to effectively respond to\nissues and challenges as they arise. Such reviews will include among others (a) implementation support\nmissions conducted semiannually; (b) annual beneficiary assessments and a midterm review that will\ninclude a comprehensive assessment of the progress achieved at the mid‐point of project implementation\nand will serve as a platform for revisiting project design issues and where adjustments might be needed;\n(c) impact assessment; and (d) implementation completion where an independent assessment of the\nproject will be undertaken and lessons drawn to inform future or similar operations.\n\n\n4. The implementation support missions will specifically focus on reviewing the quality of\nimplementation; finding solutions to implementation problems; assessing the likelihood of achieving the\nPDO; reviewing with the NIDs the action plan and disbursement programs for the next six months;\nreviewing the project’s fiduciary aspects including disbursement and procurement; verifying compliance\nof project activities with the Association’s environmental and social safeguard policies; and reviewing the\nresults against the Results Framework. The missions will combine some field visits and multistakeholder\ndiscussions.\n\n\n5. At the technical level, the Association team will assemble the appropriate technical skills and\nexperience needed to support implementation of the DRDIP II. Fiduciary reviews will be conducted by the\nAssociation’s FM and procurement specialists to ensure that fiduciary systems and capacities remain\nadequate during the course of project implementation in accordance with the Association’s fiduciary\nrequirements.\n\n\n(a) **FM.** The Association will require quarterly IFRs be submitted to the Association as well as\nthe annual external audit report for review. The Association will also review other project‐\nrelated information such as the internal control systems’ report. Annual on‐site visits will\nalso be carried out by the Association to review the FM system including internal controls.\n\n\nPage 98 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5708101987838745,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "participating countries",
+ "confidence": 0.6281877160072327,
+ "start": 181,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9268820881843567,
+ "start": 267,
+ "end": 270
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "implementation support missions",
+ "confidence": 0.5088668465614319,
+ "start": 345,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.6328712105751038,
+ "start": 460,
+ "end": 462
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.8265373706817627,
+ "start": 516,
+ "end": 517
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "annual external audit report",
+ "confidence": 0.6261845231056213,
+ "start": 526,
+ "end": 530
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6045048832893372,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 530
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal control systems’ report",
+ "confidence": 0.6101415753364563,
+ "start": 546,
+ "end": 551
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5016978979110718,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 530
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 100
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nMonitoring of actions taken on issues highlighted in audit reports, auditors’ management\nletters, internal audit, and other reports will be reviewed by the Association, including\ntransaction reviews, as needed. FM training to the Project Coordination Unit staff will be\ncarried out by effectiveness. Additional FM training will be conducted during project\nimplementation as needed.\n\n\n(b) **Procurement.** The Association will undertake implementation support missions every six\nmonths.\n\n\n6. **Safeguards.** The Association’s safeguard team will consist of social and environmental specialists\nwho will guide the project team in applying the agreed safeguard instruments as well as reviewing\ncompliance during implementation support missions.\n\n\n\n|Time|Focus|Skills Needed|Resource
Estimate|Partner Role|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|First
twelve
months|
Project implementation start up
Establishment of the PIUs at
national, subnational and local
levels
Support to implementation
activities: sensitization,
community consultations and
planning, institution building,
and strengthening of
implementation capacity,
including monitoring and
evaluation (M&E)
Development of monitoring and
evaluation methodology and
oversight of baseline survey
Capacity building and mentoring
of staff at all levels on
procurement, financial
management, M&E, and
safeguards|
Project Management
Health
Fragility and Conflict
Livelihoods
Social Development
Financial management
Procurement
M&E
Environment
Social Protection
|35,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
15,000
20,000
20,000
10,000
15,000
10,000
|
UNHCR, WFP,
DFID, UNICEF
– aligning
development
and
humanitarian
programming
with the
project
Process and
progress
monitoring
using third
party
|\n|12–48
months|
Joint IS missions with
Government counterparts and
UNHCR to monitor
implementation performance
including progress against targets
of the Results Framework
Review of community‐driven
development processes and
livelihoods
Review of annual work plans and
disbursement schedule|
Project Management
Health
Fragility and Conflict
Livelihoods
Social Development
Financial management
Procurement
M&E
Environment
Social Protection|Same as above|Same as above|\n\n\nPage 99 of 120\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9534513354301453,
+ "start": 32,
+ "end": 34
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Monitoring of actions taken on issues",
+ "confidence": 0.6863173246383667,
+ "start": 24,
+ "end": 30
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9316972494125366,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "baseline survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9998132586479187,
+ "start": 311,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.8803880214691162,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 313
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Results Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.970008373260498,
+ "start": 702,
+ "end": 704
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 101
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1| Review quality of
quarterly/annual reports
Review of audit reports and
interim financial report
Review adequacy of the financial
management system and
compliance
MTR undertaken (during year 3)|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Other|Same as above and in addition
Project Evaluation
Project completion and
Implementation Completion
Report preparation|Same as above|Same as above|Same as above|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Skills Mix Required|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Skills Needed**|**Number of Staff Weeks**
**per year**|**Number of Trips**|**Comments**|\n|
TTL
Co TTL, Health
Fragility and Conflict
Livelihoods
Social Development
Financial management
Procurement
M&E
Environment
Social Protection
|
8
8
5
6
4
3
3
3
4
4
|3
‐
2
3
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
|Washington Based
Nairobi Based
Washington Based
India Based
Nairobi Based
Nairobi Based
Nairobi Based
Nairobi Based
Nairobi based
Nairobi Based
|\n\n\n\n|Partners|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Name**|**Institution/Country**|**Role**|\n|UNHCR
|Kenya|Joint programming for communities hosting refugees|\n\n\nPage 100 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 102
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 5: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n1. The economic and financial analysis conducted as part of project preparation suggests that the\nproposed interventions are economically and financially feasible. As a CDD project, it is not possible to\npredetermine actual investments. Therefore, analyses were carried out based on a typology of the DRDIP\nII investments. The analysis employs a cost‐benefit methodology, which is perceived as a more\nappropriate approach for such a task. 20F [21] Particularly, it is a simplified cost‐benefit analysis, where solely\ndirect cost and monetary value of selected benefits are compared, whenever possible, and economic IRR\nare presented. In fact, the proposed interventions have several indirect benefits that are not quantifiable\nin monetary terms. For this reason, they cannot be accounted for, both in NPV calculations and in the\nsensitivity analysis. Nonetheless, they certainly can be listed among the project’s top benefits. A list of\nindirect, intangible benefits is presented for such interventions.\n\n\n2. The communities being analyzed face extreme poverty. They are poorly endowed with natural\nresources, have limited arable land, and are generally affected by scarce rainfall and no permanent\nsources of water. The main hypothesis is that appropriate design and implementation of various\ninvestments would significantly diminish the costs of addressing basic needs and essential services of host\ncommunities. The areas identified as critical to host communities’ self‐reliance and sustainability are\ngrouped in three components that are meant to be implemented modularly based on local\nadministrations’ capacity, planning, and priorities. A positive externality may be that appropriate, basic\ninvestments in the above three areas would significantly contribute to the creation of an effective labor\nmarket, which in turn would lead to building self‐reliant communities. In all, six interventions have been\nanalyzed (Table 5.1): three relate to Component 1, two to Component 2, and one to Component 3.\n\n\n**Table 5.1. Project’s Components and Areas of Intervention**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Development Area|Proposed Intervention|\n|---|---|---|\n|Component 1|Social and Economic Infrastructure and
Services|1. Construction of one borehole water
well
2. Construction of health facility
3. Construction of school building|\n|Component 2|Environmental and Natural Resource
Management|1. Reforestation of 1 ha land
2. Construction of one_Prosopis_
Charcoal Plant|\n|Component 3|Support to Livelihoods|1. Livestock productivity improvement|\n\n\n21 Bugnion, C. 1998. “Economic Rationalization of Humanitarian Aid: Use of cost and effectiveness indicators to evaluate ECHO\nfunded humanitarian emergencies.” European Community Humanitarian Office.\n\n\nPage 101 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 103
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**Proposed Interventions for Component 1: Social and Economic Infrastructure and Services**\n\n\n_Project 1: Ensuring Access to Water (Estimated cost: US$9,750)_\n\n\n3. Water supply in rural areas in Kenya is characterized by low levels of access or, at best, poor\nservice quality in the form of intermittent water supply. Seasonal water scarcity exacerbates the difficulty\nof improving water supply. 21F [22] The shortages of potable water negatively affects the sanitation and\nincreases the morbidity associated with orofecal contamination. F [23] This analysis focuses on a borehole as\na water source, which, according to various existing analyses, can address the needs of 365 individuals,\non average. Access to water is considered free of charge. Benefits and challenges of a borehole water\nsource are presented in Table 5.2.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Table 5.2. Benefits and Challenges of|Col2|Borehole Water Source|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Host and Refugee Population**|**Host and Refugee Population**|**Government/Environment**|**Government/Environment**|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Time savings** particularly for women.
Time saved can be used for children's
welfare and upbringing, gaining new
skills, training, or participation in
associations.
**Reduction in morbidity and mortality**
with reduction in prevalence of
waterborne diseases, at least by 25
percent, by improving access to
drinking water, through (a) reducing
diarrheal incidence rate by 10–40
percent and (b) reduced mortality
rates, with reduced incidence of
diarrhea.
**Reduction of conflicts** and tension over
scarce availability of water
**Strengthening social cohesion**|**Conflict** over water
point management
**Injuries** or fatalities
during building|**Reduced costs** of
treatment for poor
quality water‐related
illnesses
**Reduction of**
**greenhouse gas**
**emissions**with
compensatory
reforestation around
water points. This will
create a carbon sink to
soak up carbon
dioxide, which in turn
would help reduce
greenhouse gas
emissions.
|**The accelerated**
**decline** of
groundwater levels,
resulting from
climate change and
excessive use of
groundwater
resources
**Water and soil**
**pollution**during
work|\n\n\n\n_Note:_ Studies in Nigeria – “GDN, 2013, Cost‐Effectiveness and Benefit‐Costs Analysis of Some Water Interventions”\n\n- revealed that a typical eight‐member household spends about 14 hours a day to fetch water (that is, 5,110 hours\nper year) from traditional sources such as wells and rivers. The installation of a borehole or pipeline water system\nreduced this time, on an average, to 18 minutes to fetch 20 liters of water from boreholes and zero time to get\npiped‐water, respectively.\n\n\n22 Water Service Quality – WASREB Impact Report 2009. Kenya Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB, a state corporation\nengaged in reforming the water sector in Kenya).\n23 Kenya ‐ World Health Organization (WHO). 2015. _UN‐Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking‐Water_\n_Report_ . http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas/2014/kenya‐12‐oct.pdf .\n\n\nPage 102 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.608849048614502,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "borehole water\nsource",
+ "confidence": 0.636991560459137,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Benefits and challenges of a borehole water\nsource",
+ "confidence": 0.6826886534690857,
+ "start": 166,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Water Service Quality – WASREB Impact Report 2009",
+ "confidence": 0.6159517765045166,
+ "start": 751,
+ "end": 759
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Kenya Water Services Regulatory Board",
+ "confidence": 0.8577014803886414,
+ "start": 760,
+ "end": 765
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7623198628425598,
+ "start": 760,
+ "end": 761
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2009",
+ "confidence": 0.7740435004234314,
+ "start": 758,
+ "end": 759
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 104
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n_Project 2: Construction of a Health Facility (Estimated cost: US$388,330)_\n\n\n4. Hospitals are perceived as vital and necessary resources that ensure self‐reliance and benefits to\na community, 23F [24] including surgery, maternity care, HIV and tuberculosis treatment, and an inpatient\nfeeding center for malnourished children. 24F [25] The health staff‐to‐population ratio in the refugee‐hosting\nareas in Kenya is, on average, 1.4 doctors per 100,000 persons—significantly below the Sub‐Saharan Africa\ndeveloping countries average of 20 per 100,000—and an average of 1.8 midwives per 100,000 persons 25F [26]\nversus a Sub‐Saharan Africa developing countries average of 112 per 100,000. All these figures are below\nWorld Health Organization standards. 26F [27] The insufficient number of health infrastructure and healthcare\npersonnel may very likely result in a high and rising incidence of disease such as tuberculosis, malaria,\ncholera, and AIDS. 27F [28] There are benefits and challenges in building a health center (Table 5.3).\n\n\n**Table 5.3. Benefits and Challenges of Building a Health Center**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Reduction** of maternal mortality
**Protection** of children
**Increased** immunization through
vaccination
**Improved** fight against HIV/AIDS
as well as treatments of the
infected
**Increased** access to health
service|**Poor quality** of
service and shortage
of qualified nurses,
midwives, and allied
health professionals|**Diminishing overall**
**budget burden** as the
result of increased
immunization and
reduction of severe
illness|**Increasing costs** of
running facility center
**Shortage of qualified**
nurses, midwives, and
allied health
professionals
|\n\n\n\n5. **Immunization.** UNICEF has been promoting an immunization program led by Kenya’s Ministry of\nPublic Health and Sanitation in Dadaab since mid‐2016. The initiative has dramatically reduced the risk of\ndisease transmission in communities around the Dadaab refugee camp. In particular, the integrated\ncampaign aims at protecting children and young adults in those communities against measles and polio\nand providing vitamin A supplementation and de‐worming. 28F [29]\n\n\n6. **Nutrition.** Since 2015, the UN WFP in partnership with United States Agency for International\nDevelopment’s Office of Food for Peace has been supporting food‐insecure communities around the\nDadaab and Kakuma refugee camps by providing cash or food in exchange for work on improving\n\n24 Shephard, D.S., D. Hodgkin, Y. Anthony. 1998. _Analysis of Hospital Costs: A Manual for Managers_ . Working paper.\n25 Kenya, _Medecins Sans Frontieres_ (Doctors Without Borders, MSF). 2015. “Kenya: Cholera Outbreak Spreads to Dadaab\nRefugee Camp.” http://www.msf.org/en/article/kenya‐cholera‐outbreak‐spreads‐dadaab‐refugee‐camp.\n26 Kenya, _Medecins Sans Frontieres_ (Doctors Without Borders, MSF). 2015. “Kenya: Cholera Outbreak Spreads to Dadaab\nRefugee Camp.” http://www.msf.org/en/article/kenya‐cholera‐outbreak‐spreads‐dadaab‐refugee‐camp.\n27 World Development Indicator based on World Health Organization data (2015).\n28 WHO (2006).\n29 UNICEF. Kenya. https://www.unicef.org/kenya/media_9098.html\n\n\nPage 103 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6933022141456604,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Health Organization",
+ "confidence": 0.6931016445159912,
+ "start": 178,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "health staff‐to‐population ratio",
+ "confidence": 0.5401222109794617,
+ "start": 93,
+ "end": 100
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Health Organization",
+ "confidence": 0.5960469841957092,
+ "start": 178,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Sub‐Saharan Africa\ndeveloping countries",
+ "confidence": 0.5479133725166321,
+ "start": 126,
+ "end": 132
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "immunization program",
+ "confidence": 0.8875305652618408,
+ "start": 517,
+ "end": 519
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "World Development Indicator",
+ "confidence": 0.7979366183280945,
+ "start": 734,
+ "end": 737
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Kenya",
+ "confidence": 0.7929937243461609,
+ "start": 676,
+ "end": 677
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.8921536207199097,
+ "start": 689,
+ "end": 690
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2015",
+ "confidence": 0.5933879613876343,
+ "start": 718,
+ "end": 719
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "food‐insecure communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8134018182754517,
+ "start": 622,
+ "end": 626
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 105
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\ncommunity infrastructure, such as rehabilitating local roads or irrigation systems. 29F [30] WFP has recently\nhanded over food distribution to local communities’ authorities. Furthermore, Food for Peace, which\nsupports refugees living in the two camps and their host communities through direct food distributions,\nmother and child health and nutrition, and supplementary and therapeutic nutritious foods, is also\nproviding funding and in‐kind, ready‐to‐use therapeutic foods to UNICEF for the treatment of severe acute\nmalnutrition. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies has also been\nproviding food, particularly therapeutic nutrition. 30F [31] In particular, maternal, infant, and young child\nnutrition programs have been implemented targeting pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children\nunder age five. The outpatient therapeutic feeding program offers services to children with severe acute\nmalnutrition, while the supplementary feeding program caters to children with moderate acute\nmalnutrition and all pregnant women and lactating mothers. Nutritional support is also offered to patients\nliving with tuberculosis and HIV. As a consequence, several premature children have been able to survive,\ngain weight, and develop the ability to breastfeed, while young mothers have been receiving adequate\nfood and education on best food strategies to improve the availability and quality of breast milk.\n\n\n_Project 3: Building a Community School (Estimated cost: US$195,484)_\n\n\n7. A community school can serve multiple purposes of being a school and a meeting and learning\nspace for the community (Table 5.4). It will be characterized by a significant participation of the local\ncommunity, which would contribute to creation, construction, financing, and management.\n\n\n**Table 5.4. Benefits and Challenges of Building One School**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Improved access to**education
**Higher attendance of**students
and teachers leading to
improved learning outcomes
and building solid social capital
**Poverty reduction** ‐ access to
education increases the
chances of higher earnings in
the future and thus, reduces
poverty.
**Parental education** positively
affects the child’s educational
level, achievement, and health.
**Increases life expectancy** and
reduces mortality rate
**Boosts technological change**
by diffusion of knowledge|**The limited capacity**
of the school may
increase competition
and exclusion.
**Increasing social**
tensions in case of
excessive demand|**Reduction of financial**
**burden**through
efficient access to
education for groups
like girls, rural
communities, ethnic
minorities, and
migrants is improved.
**High‐cost efficiency**
with community
involvement
Poverty reduction
Education reduces
criminal activity.|**The risk of increased**
**budget burden**when
school does not secure
funding for long‐term
running
**High risk of inefficient**
allocation and spending of
funds
**Weak salary incentives**
may lead high rate of
teacher absenteeism.
**Poor fiduciary control** may
increase the risk of
corruption.|\n\n\n\n30 United States Agency for International Development. 2017. _https://www.usaid.gov/kenya/food‐assistance_\n31 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, May 2016, _https://goo.gl/xobe57_\n\n\n\nPage 104 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 106
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n_Note:_ Jimenez, E., and H. A. Patrinos. 2008. “Can Cost‐Benefit Analysis Guide Education Policy in Developing\nCountries?” Policy Research Working Paper 4568; Wolfe, B., and S. Zuvekas. 1997. “Non‐Market Effects of\nEducation.” International Journal of Education Research 27(6): 491–502.\n\n\n8. **Girl child education is a very sensitive aspect of education related to girls’ enrollment.** Very often\ngirls are not enrolled in school because they are expected to marry early and join their husband’s family,\nlet alone contribute very early to their family income. For this reason, parents are not able to see how\neducation could benefit their daughters or the family. However, several international programs,\npromoted by various international organizations and NGOs, have tried to sensitize communities and, more\nimportantly, parents, with good results. Remarkably, benefits of education for girls include both short‐\nand long‐term positive effects. For example, an immediate set of outcomes concerns the acquisition by\nyoung girls of both basic education and, when programs are integrated with mentoring, important life\nskills to navigate the transition from childhood to adolescence, overcome negative peer pressure, avoid\nrisky sexual behavior, give birth to their first children at a later age, change negative attitudes toward\neducation, deal more effectively with problems related to female genital mutilation, and manage\nmenstruation while in school. 31F [32] Among the long‐term gains, the most important ones appear to be\ncompounding the benefits of education by providing their community with lessons for future\ngenerations, 32F [33] providing a role model for younger girls who could therefore overcome gender stereotypes,\ncultural norms, and eventually, taboos. Moreover, long‐term benefits would contribute to address issues\nsuch as GBV; early and child marriages; female genital mutilation; menstrual management and hygiene;\nrisky sexual behavior; truancy, drug abuse, and other negative behavior; subjugation of girls and women\nin poor communities; and life skills and academic achievement.\n\n\n**Proposed Interventions for Component 2: Environmental and Natural Resource Management**\n\n\n9. The high, unsustainable exploitation of the environment and natural resources in and around the\nrefugee camps of Dadaab and Kakuma could be contained through a programmatic reforestation of the\naffected areas. A survey conducted in China in 2005, F [34] as part of a Canadian International Development\nAgency (CIDA) study, reveals that such a project cannot be effectively implemented without providing\nhouseholds in the target areas with resources meant to substitute the drivers of deforestation itself.\nHouseholds in the two host communities use trees for energy, grazing, and construction. A successful\nimplementation of a reforestation project should address those needs to allow saplings to grow and\nconsolidate. In the meantime, the Government could subsidize those households and provide them with\nenergy, livelihood, and construction material. However, as found in the CIDA study, such a solution is only\napplicable over the short term as a Government cannot provide seamless subsidization. A possible\napproach to address the sustainability issue could be providing households with sustainable means that\nwould be economically convenient substitutes. For this reason, the proposed economic analysis identifies\ntwo possible interventions meant to address the reforestation need while partially resolving the\n\n\n32 https://www.brookings.edu/research/mentoring‐for‐kenyas‐marginalized‐girls/\n33 UNHCR reports crisis in refugee education http://www.unhcr.org/en‐us/news/press/2016/9/57d7d6f34/unhcr‐reports‐crisis‐\nrefugee‐education.html\n34 “The costs and benefits of reforestation in Liping County, Guizhou Province, China” in ‘‘Confronting Global Warming:\nEnhancing China’s Capacity for Carbon Sequestration’’ (Project Number: A‐031511) by CIDA. _Journal of Environmental_\n_Management_ 85 (2007) 722–735.\n\n\nPage 105 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.876417875289917,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8822094202041626,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.8343993425369263,
+ "start": 472,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9604555368423462,
+ "start": 472,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CIDA",
+ "confidence": 0.5471476316452026,
+ "start": 492,
+ "end": 493
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "China",
+ "confidence": 0.9625048637390137,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2005",
+ "confidence": 0.9952608942985535,
+ "start": 477,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8444048166275024,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 508
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "CIDA study",
+ "confidence": 0.5054348111152649,
+ "start": 586,
+ "end": 588
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "CIDA",
+ "confidence": 0.5928325653076172,
+ "start": 492,
+ "end": 493
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.7581779956817627,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 508
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "economic analysis",
+ "confidence": 0.7674501538276672,
+ "start": 635,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.8909184336662292,
+ "start": 618,
+ "end": 619
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 107
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nsubstitution requirements, at least regarding the energy needs. Remarkably, energy needs represent the\nmajor driver of deforestation in the two areas of the study.\n\n\n_Project 4: Reforestation of 1 ha Land (Estimated cost: US$2,558 per household per year)_\n\n\n10. According to the CIDA study, reforestation of 1 ha of land would entail an average cost of\nUS$2,558 per household per year on average. Such costs not only include seedlings but also cash and food\nsubsidies to affected households. Individual or household cash flow from this activity can be discounted\nas it is offset by lost income for not using environmental and natural resources. On the other hand, gains\nwith regard to environmental and natural resource restoration, albeit not quantifiable in monetary terms\n(Table 5.5), significantly outscore any other type of returns the initiative may entail.\n\n\n**Table 5.5. Benefits and Challenges of Reforestation**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Improved quality life** because of
increased presence of trees and
vegetation and fauna
**Access to**cleaner, unpolluted air|**Potential food and**
**livelihoods insecurity**
because of interruption
of Government
subsidization program|**Substantial reduction in**
**CO2**because of carbon
sequestration
**Substantial enrichment**
**of**land because of
presence of flora in
otherwise deserted
areas
**Reduced migration and**
**conflict**because of
reduced desertification
and increased livestock
**Increased health**
**standards**|**Risk of resorting to**
**tree depletion in**
**case**of energy
needs or limited
subsidization|\n\n\n\n_Project 5: Construction of a Prosopis juriflora Charcoal Plant (Estimated cost: US$114)_\n\n\n11. _Prosopis juriflora_, commonly named _mathenge_, is a widespread tree species in dryland areas in\nKenya, including, among many others, Garissa and Turkana, 34F [35] which is considered a threat to livestock by\nlocal residents. Yet, if properly managed and utilized, it can also improve social and economic conditions,\nand the livelihoods of those communities. The Kenya Forest Service—a Government agency—has\nsponsored various workshops aimed at promoting favorable uses of the tree. 35F [36] Among many possibilities,\nits transformation into charcoal appears to be one of the most cost‐effective and useful exploitations,\nwith two positive outcomes: substantial eradication of a harmful tree from the affected areas and\nenvironmental protection of flora and fauna in areas hosting refugees by saving more valuable trees used\n\n\n35 Kenya Forest Service. “Demystifying Mathenge.” Government of Kenya.\n36 http://www.kenyaforestservice.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=419:demystifying‐\nmathenge&catid=81&Itemid=538.\n\n\nPage 106 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 108
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nfor charcoal production (Table 5.6). Construction of a _Prosopis_ charcoal plant appears to be extremely\naffordable, estimated at US$114, and its returns on investment are clearly economically convenient. In\nfact, carbonization of branches and other parts of the tree can be conducted using natural elements such\nas soil and leaves to make an earth‐mound‐kiln. Indeed, costs only refer to labor and wood‐cutting tools.\nBuilding on existing studies 36F [37] and adjusting for Kenya’s cost of living and wage levels, the analysis shows\na remarkable cost‐effectiveness of such an initiative. Assuming a production of 450 bags of charcoal per\nhectare per year and a price of US$2.30 per bag, the expected margin has been estimated in US$520 per\nhectare per year, with an NPV of US$2,267 over a five‐year period.\n\n\n**Table 5.6. Benefits and Challenges of** _**Prosopis**_ **Charcoal Transformation**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Host and Refugee Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Improved quality life** because of
increased presence of local flora
and fauna
**Access to**a more affordable,
sustainable energy source
**More efficiently** cooking food
and lighting homes, with no need
to cut valuable trees
**Extended study hours** for school
children because of augmented
charcoal availability
**Remarkable increase in job**
**creation potential**because of
_Prosopis_charcoal plant and
possible trade|**Possible conflict over**
**limited****_Prosopis_ areas**
if charcoal production
becomes overly
common
**Flora and fauna**
**depletion** if_Prosopis_
becomes scarce
because of overuse,
which may make
people resort to
burning old wood from
other trees. The issue
may become bigger in
case of augmented
demand.|**Decreased pressure**
because of improved
employment
opportunities for both
production and trade of
_Prosopis_charcoal
**Increased number of**
**taxpayers**|**Risk of conflict or**
**resorting to**
**valuable tree**
**depletion in case**of
augmented energy
demand or_Prosopis_
scarcity|\n\n\n\n**Proposed Interventions for Component 3: Support to Livelihoods**\n\n\n_Project 6: Livestock Productivity Improvement (Estimated cost: US$510 per livestock unit_ 37F _[38]_ _per year for_\n_production of dairy only; USD 14 per livestock unit for production of dairy and meat)_\n\n\n12. The proposed project covers various aspects related to livestock productivity and its objective is\nto increase the household income of farmers through increased livestock productivity (Table 5.7). A 2012\n\n\n37 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287127244_Is_control_through_utilization_a_cost_effective_Prosopis_juliflora_\nmanagement_strategy.\n\n38 The livestock unit (LSU) is a reference unit which facilitates the aggregation of livestock from various species and age as per\nconvention, via the use of specific coefficients established initially on the basis of the nutritional or feed requirement of each\ntype of animal. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy\ncow producing 3,000 kg of milk annually, without additional concentrated foodstuffs. _http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics‐_\n_explained/index.php/Glossary:Livestock_unit_(LSU)_\n\n\nPage 107 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 109
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nstudy by University of Nairobi, International Livestock Research Institute, and University of Liverpool 38F [39] The\nproject assesses two different scenarios: (a) cattle for production of dairy only and (b) for production of\nboth dairy and meat. Adjusting for an average 6.5 percent inflation rate over the past five years (2012–\n2016), the interventions in the areas of the study are apparently economically convenient with an IRR of\n114 percent under normal parameters and 92 percent in case of 10 percent higher costs and 10 percent\nlower benefits in the case of dairy only, and 2,082 percent under normal parameters and 1,720 percent\nin case of 10 percent higher costs and 10 percent lower benefits in the case of both dairy and meat\nproduction. 39F [40]\n\n\n**Table 5.7. Benefits and Challenges of Livestock Productivity Project**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Displaced and Local Population|Col2|Government/Environment|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Positive**|**Negative**|**Positive**|**Negative**|\n|**Government commitment** to
the development of the
subsector
**Possibility to own and manage**
large quantity of quality
livestock
**Possible availability** of local and
export markets for livestock
products|**Possible low**
productivity because
of:
**a possible low**
**genetic potential** of
indigenous livestock;
**low‐input, low‐**
**output animal**
**husbandry** practices
of the majority of
livestock owners;
**shortage** of grazing
and animal feeds;
**high cost**and poor
quality of inputs;
**poor rural**
**infrastructure**
(mainly road network
and power), with
negative implications
on service delivery
and marketing;
**inadequate technical**
**support** from the
understaffed and
poorly equipped|**Inclusion of the livestock**
sector among the strategic
exports
**Promotion of farmers’**
organizations and improved
agricultural service delivery,
including for livestock
**Willingness**of a number of
national and multinational
NGOs and development
partners to provide
counterpart funding and
technical assistance to
develop the sector
**Availability** of a local and
export markets for livestock
products.|**Possible civil**
**unrest** and
instability because
of limited grazing|\n\n\n\n39 “Productivity in Different Cattle Production Systems in Kenya.” _Tropical Animal Health and Production_ 45 (2). July 2012.\n_www.researchgate.net/publication/229436946_Productivity_in_different_cattle_production_systems_in_Kenya_\n\n40 The analysis only regards small herd size of 2–10 livestock units.\n\n\nPage 108 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 110
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**NPVs of Proposed Interventions over a Five‐Year Period**\n\n\n13. The cost and monetary value of the selected benefits, the cumulative value of benefits as well as\nthe NPV of selected development projects are presented in Table 5.8. Because of the highly controversial\nmonetary value of human life, as well as deferred benefits of school graduates, the analysis of five years’\nbenefits excluded the benefits from building a hospital and school. Moreover, given the high number of\nindirect benefits, which cannot be quantifiable in monetary terms, the NPV and subsequent sensitivity\nanalysis does not include the paved roads and reforestation projects.\n\n\n**Table 5.8. NPVs of Proposed Interventions ‐ Social Discount Rate Used: 3 Percent**\n\n\n**(Equal to Inflation Rate as of March 2015)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Col2|Present Value of Benefits from First to Fifth Year (US$)|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Development**
**Project**|**Invest**
**ment**
**(US$)**|**1 **|**2 **|**3 **|**4 **|**5 **|**Estimated**
**Cumulative**
**value of**
**benefits**
**(US$)**|**NPV (US$)**|\n|Borehole
water|9,750|18,176|17,646|17,132|16,633|16,149|85,736|75,986|\n|Prosopis
Charcoal|114|505|490|476|462|449|2,381|2,267|\n|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy Only|510|608|591|573|557|540|2,869|2,359|\n|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy & Meat|14|300|291|283|275|267|1,416|1,402|\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations based on cost‐benefit analysis simulations and estimated NPV of monetized benefits.\n\n\n**Sensitivity Analysis**\n\n\n14. A sensitivity analysis has been conducted to assess the effect on the IRR of variations in benefits\nand costs in the realization of benefits, limited to projects where benefits could be expressed in monetary\nterms. Notwithstanding an increase in cost by 10 percent or a decrease in the total estimated benefits by\n10 percent, the results appear to remain robust. Moreover, a third scenario that contemplates a 10\npercent increase in costs combined with a 10 percent decrease in benefits still shows a robust IRR (Table\n5.9), considering a social discount rate of 3 percent according to World bank guidelines. In conclusion, the\n\n\nPage 109 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 111
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\noverall net discounted benefits of the presented conservative cost‐benefit analysis remain positive under\nany circumstances.\n\n\n**Table 5.9. Sensitivity Analysis**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Water (%)|Prosopis Charcoal
production (%)|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy Only (%)|Livestock
Productivity
Dairy and
Meat (%)|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Base Scenario|183|440|114|2082|\n|Cost + 10% or Benefit − 10%|165|400|103|189|\n|Cost + 10% and Benefit −
10%|150|363|92|1720|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Team calculations based on cost‐benefit analysis simulations and estimated NPV of monetized benefits.\nSocial discount rate (SCD) of 3 percent in accordance with World Bank guidelines.\n\n\nPage 110 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 112
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: SUPPORT TO IGAD FOR EXPANSION OF THE REGIONAL SECRETARIAT ON FORCED DISPLACEMENT AND**\n\n**MIXED MIGRATION**\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n**Strategic Context and Rationale**\n\n\n1. The IGAD, through its Regional Secretariat on FDMM, has a critical role under the regional\noperation to advocate holistic regional responses to forced displacement to influence interventions in\nrefugee‐hosting and refugee‐producing member states. In this context, the Regional Secretariat on FDMM\ncreated and supported under DRDIP I (P152822) seeks to build the capacities of Project countries and\ninstitutions in Djibouti, Ethiopia and Uganda as well as the other IGAD Member States.\n\n\n2. Under the existing DRIDP I (P152822), a US$5 million grant to the IGAD has enabled the\nestablishment of the Regional Secretariat on FDMM based in Nairobi and Djibouti with the necessary\ncapabilities to (a) advocate holistic regional responses to FDMM that are supported by data generated on\ndisplacement to influence interventions in refugee‐hosting and refugee‐producing member states; (b)\nsupport policy dialogue with member states and academic and research institutions on\ntransitional/progressive solutions to displacement; (c) generate evidence on innovative management of\nthe impacts of FDMM through research; (d) build the capacities of countries and institutions in the HOA\nto innovatively respond to FDMM; (e) undertake knowledge management and focused M&E of DRDIP\nimplementation; (f) forge partnerships between humanitarian and development actors in the HOA region\nto rethink the application of durable solutions; and (g) consolidate the capacity of the IGAD to respond to\nFDMM and be a strong actor, both regionally and internationally, in discussions affecting the HOA.\n\n\n3. The DRDIP II (P161067) will support the expansion of IGAD’s existing Regional Secretariat for\nFDMM to include Kenya that will join other DRDIP countries in the PRSC and represented by nominees of\nits national steering committee and the project coordinator. Kenya as well as all other IGAD Member\nStates will benefit from the Regional Secretariat‐led activities including research, knowledge generation,\nthe documentation of lessons learned to enhance the coordination, knowledge sharing, and learning\nacross the project countries. The RPSC will provide oversight of the implementation of the regional\nprogram and will guide, advise, and support a regional policy dialogue. In addition, this DRDIP II will\nsupport DRDIP project countries and other IGAD Member States to: (i) discuss the challenge of the Somalia\ndisplacement that they all have in common; and (ii) engage the Republic of Somalia to more effectively\nparticipate in this dialogue and to take a lead role in the planning and coordination of displacement‐\nresponsive development in places of return and on addressing displacement challenges more widely.\n\n\n4. For Somalia, the Regional Secretariat will help improve the ability of the Republic of Somalia to\ndefine appropriate development responses at the federal, state, and local government levels. In Somalia,\nincreased refugee return from asylum countries, including Kenya and Yemen, is occurring against the\nbackdrop of ongoing conditions of drought, poverty, vulnerability, and internal displacement. Existing\ndevelopment deficits, poverty and internal displacement in the communities to which refugees will return\ncompound a broader inability by the Government and international partners to provide adequately for\nreturnees in Somalia. The risk is that the pressures posed by refugee return will contribute to further\ndisparities and exclusion which further compromise community resilience. Considerable investment is\nrequired to address vulnerabilities within the receiving communities to enable sustainable refugee return.\n\n\nPage 111 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.9235450625419617,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6969685554504395,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP I",
+ "confidence": 0.5055025219917297,
+ "start": 136,
+ "end": 138
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FDMM",
+ "confidence": 0.6718569397926331,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 196
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "data generated on\ndisplacement",
+ "confidence": 0.6527849435806274,
+ "start": 219,
+ "end": 223
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP",
+ "confidence": 0.5345429182052612,
+ "start": 306,
+ "end": 307
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "project countries",
+ "confidence": 0.5323266386985779,
+ "start": 487,
+ "end": 489
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "DRDIP II",
+ "confidence": 0.5920296907424927,
+ "start": 482,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5398463010787964,
+ "start": 504,
+ "end": 505
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5938756465911865,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "refugee return",
+ "confidence": 0.55143803358078,
+ "start": 667,
+ "end": 669
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.5512300133705139,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 113
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nCurrently, a number of different agencies and actors are supporting returnees, IDPs, and host\ncommunities with shelter, livelihood intervention, and essential social services. There is increasing\ncommitment to enable the Government better lead and coordinate those efforts and to supplement them\nwith longer‐term developmental responses. The activities under the proposed Additional Grant to the\nIGAD will facilitate this.\n\n\n5. Somalia’s arrears status and non‐IDA eligibility means that there are constraints to large‐scale\ninvestment by the World Bank in directly supporting sustainable return of refugees or the implementation\nof development responses to forced displacement at the present time. Multiple other actors are,\nhowever, mobilizing support for area‐based multisectoral development investment in places of return in\nSomalia as well as defining durable solutions for wider displacement challenges. Those efforts to build\ncommunity resilience to support the reintegration of returning refugees, while also addressing issues of\nvulnerability and internal displacement, are gaining pace.\n\n\n6. **The pressures of refugee return.** Among the member countries which have seen refugee return,\nmost of this is to urban centers including in countries like South Sudan in the past and Somalia currently.\nWhile some urban infrastructure exists (such as water supply, sanitation, and paved road networks), much\nof the service delivery is weak. For example, the main source of urban power remains fossil fuel generators\nand solid waste management is stretched. Formalizing land ownership in the urban settings is particularly\nproblematic with few systems for regularization. The urban fabric has been substantially affected by IDP\nmovements, which are extremely fluid. In these countries, many IDPs settle for a time in poorly serviced\nencampments or in vacant housing and hence remain vulnerable to eviction. While return policies exist in\ncountries like Somalia or South Sudan, there is a need to create a common understanding on how to\noperationalize it, with Governments taking the lead in coordination of return processes.\n\n\n7. In these refugee return settings, host communities, services, and institutions in the absence of\nincreased support may soon reach their optimal absorption capacities and will be inadequate to support\nsustainable refugee returns. In some areas, these thresholds have been stretched to their breaking point,\nwhile in others they have already been exceeded. This is evident in resettlements areas in Uganda that\ncontinues to receive large number of South Sudanese refugees. In Somalia, the Jubbaland Refugee and\nInternally Displaced Persons Agency—the agency tasked to coordinate the resettlement and create\npolicies to manage the return—has requested assistance from international partners faced with the\nimmense challenge of managing the returns in a context of internal displacement and fragility. A key major\nchallenge remains the lack of a database on available services in areas of return that would guide\ninterventions and programming. Although there are some mappings done by various agencies, each tends\nto focus on a specific area of mandate without a consolidated approach. Information on the profiles of\nreturnees would also be useful for planning livelihood opportunities as well as service delivery.\n\n\n8. **Beyond humanitarian assistance.** During the past 20 years, the humanitarian community has\nbeen leading the response to the needs and protection of IDPs, refugees, and returnees in the IGAD\nmember countries. This has helped in lifesaving provision and monitoring of the human rights situation of\nthose affected but conversely it has also resulted in fragmentation of service provision across sectors and\nhas mostly focused on settlements and camps for displaced persons, with little attention to the broader\nneeds of host communities and receiving communities, in the absence of an area‐based planning\napproach. There has also been insufficient government leadership of the humanitarian responses.\n\n\nPage 112 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.9061111211776733,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.8753169775009155,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "database on available services",
+ "confidence": 0.6023486256599426,
+ "start": 524,
+ "end": 528
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "areas of return",
+ "confidence": 0.8640202879905701,
+ "start": 529,
+ "end": 532
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "profiles of\nreturnees",
+ "confidence": 0.7766711711883545,
+ "start": 567,
+ "end": 570
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 114
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n9. **Government leadership.** In the past, a recurring weakness in attempts to bring development and\nhumanitarian actors together around displacement in IGAD Member States has been inadequate\ngovernment leadership to enable coordinated planning across different actors. The Regional Secretariat\non FDMM is supporting the conceptualization of development responses for forced displacement,\ngovernment leadership of those responses, and improving linkages between humanitarian and\ndevelopment actors and strategies in tis member countries.\n\n\n10. **Capacity support.** The Regional Secretariat on FDMM will undertake a further capacity\nassessment to identify how those capacity gaps can be met through extension of their ongoing regional\ninitiatives on policy dialogue, technical assistance, data collection and capacity building. The intention of\nthe US$3 million grant to the IGAD is to contribute to filling the capacity gaps and finance activities to fill\nthe critical gaps to enable a government‐led, development response to displacement impacts in IGAD\nmember States to support durable solutions in host and return areas of refugees including Somalia.\n\n\n**Component Activity Description**\n\n\n11. The component will be implemented in two stages:\n\n\n(a) **First Stage, first six months.**\n\n\n(i) The IGAD Regional Secretariat on FDMM will commission a rapid assessment to assess\nthe capacity, processes, and systems building needs in support of return and reintegration\nincluding a quick mapping and profiling of key actors. This assessment will build on\ncapacity diagnostic work under way by other actors. The results of the assessment will\nenable the IGAD’s FDMM Regional Secretariat to define a plan for bringing Republic of\nSomalia into relevant and existing regional capacity building initiatives being undertaken\nby the Regional Secretariat. This planning exercise will result in an implementation plan\nto be completed within six months of effectiveness of this grant. The implementation plan\nwill be finalized on the basis of consultation with key stakeholders and will be reviewed\nto be acceptable to the World Bank.\n\n\n(ii) Kenya will become part of the Project Regional Steering Committee by nominating\nrepresentatives from the Project National Steering Committee and the National Project\nImplementation Unit.\n\n\n(b) **Second Stage, until the end of the Project.** In subsequent years, activities will be funded in\naccordance with the agreed implementation plan. Illustrative activities that may be funded\nunder the component are as follows:\n\n\n(i) Extension of regional technical assistance for developing relevant policies and\nappropriate guidelines for ensuring a coordinated development response in return\nareas and to address forced displacement more widely\n\n\n(ii) Extension of regional technical assistance for building capacities, systems, and\nprocesses for sustainable return and reintegration of refugees and displaced persons\n\n\nPage 113 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8396363854408264,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 13
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6820304989814758,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.538780927658081,
+ "start": 257,
+ "end": 258
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Republic of\nSomalia",
+ "confidence": 0.562694251537323,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 322
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "refugees",
+ "confidence": 0.6530287861824036,
+ "start": 208,
+ "end": 209
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5013574957847595,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 304
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Republic of\nSomalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5375718474388123,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 322
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 115
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n(iii) Extension and management of a regional database to include mapping of pressure\npoints, services, spatial planning to determine gaps in provision, identify priorities for\nareas and agencies, and prevent duplication and inefficiencies\n\n\n(iv) Regular monitoring, reporting, and learning from experiences for scaling up\n\n\n(v) Responding to ‘just‐in‐time’ needs expressed by government authorities, which could\nrange from providing an expert with specific skills to reviewing documents or carrying\nout assessments\n\n\n12. The component design takes into account the IDA regional guidelines and the World Bank’s policy\non countries with loans in nonaccrual status. IGAD will manage, contract and hold to fiscal account all\ncomponent activities. There will be no on‐lending by IGAD to member countries that are IDA‐ineligible\nlike Somalia and Sudan.\n\n\nPage 114 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "regional database",
+ "confidence": 0.977073073387146,
+ "start": 32,
+ "end": 34
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "The World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.6474583745002747,
+ "start": 2,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.9426548480987549,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 21
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA regional guidelines",
+ "confidence": 0.8791184425354004,
+ "start": 122,
+ "end": 125
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 116
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 7: LABOR INTENSIVE PUBLIC WORKS** 40F **[41]**\n\n\n**Kenya**\n**Development Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa**\n\n\n1. The counties of Garissa, Turkana, and Wajir, in the north and northeastern region of Kenya, where\nthe DRDIP II will be implemented, suffer from high levels of poverty, lack of access to income‐generating\nopportunities, and widespread environmental degradation. LIPWs are proposed to serve as an effective\ntemporary measure to provide immediate access to predictable and timely income to the needy. Such\ninterventions will help smooth critical consumption gaps during lean periods, while more long‐term and\nsustainable employment opportunities are being established under the project. At the same time,\ninfrastructure activities will focus on strengthening community assets aimed at enhancing natural\nresource productivity, thereby addressing issues arising from environmental degradation. To benefit\nhouseholds in the most meaningful way, LIPWs will be planned and implemented on a multiyear basis,\nenabling predictable income.\n\n\n**Proposed Basic Features of LIPWs under the DRDIP II**\n\n\n2. Based on the unique environmental and cultural dynamics of the targeted areas, and considering\nthe main risks involved with implementation of LIPW activities in these areas (see Key Risks), the following\nare proposed as the basic features of LIPW under the DRDIP II. These will be further discussed and agreed\nupon with the Government and documented in an operations manual developed specifically for LIPWs\nunder the DRDIP II before commencing implementation, which will be a part of the PIM.\n\n\n - **Targeting.** LIPW under the KDRIDP will provide beneficiaries from poor and vulnerable\nhouseholds with a seasonal transfer in return for their participation in the public works\nactivities. Beneficiaries of LIPWs within the defined geographic target will be first identified\nbased on vulnerability criterion. The poorest and most vulnerable households with able‐\nbodied members will then be selected and verified using community mobilization and\ntargeting methods. During preparation of the operations manual, the possibility of using the\nharmonized targeting tool currently being developed for the NSNP will be explored, as well\nas the possibility of using existing data from the Single Registry of beneficiaries, established\nin the Ministry of East African Community, Labor and Social Protection under the NSNP.\nMoreover, in Turkana County, a massive registration process has been undertaken for the\nHunger Safety Net Program (which forms part of the NSNP), and usefulness of this data for\ntargeting of LIPWs will be considered. Building on, or at least aligning to, the Single Registry\nwill ensure coordination of efforts and avoid duplication of support to households that are\nalready benefiting from the NSNP and other related social protection assistance.\n\n\n - **LIPW menu.** LIPW will consist of a variety of subprojects to create important community\nassets. Based on multistakeholder consultations, these could include rural access roads, tree\n\n\n41 To assess the potential to implement LIPWs under the DRDIP II, a feasibility study was World Bank in November 2016. The\nfeasibility study was undertaken in the host communities around the Dadaab and Kakuma refugee camps in Garissa and\nTurkana counties, respectively. The study focused on (a) understanding existing relevant public works interventions, including\ndesign and implementation arrangements; (b) determining institutional capacity of the Government and stakeholder to design\nand implement LIPWs; and (c) recommending options for the ways in which LIPW could be considered under the DRDIP II.\n\n\nPage 115 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 117
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nnurseries, afforestation, the construction of different soil and water conservation measures\nand flood control structures, small‐scale irrigation, hand‐dug wells, valley tanks, community\npond construction, and the construction or rehabilitation of market places (detailed in Table\n7.1).\n\n\n**Table 7.1. LIPW Activities and Their Expected Outcome**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Activities|Expected Outcome|\n|---|---|\n|Physical soil and water conservation activities (hillside terraces,
gully control, and so on)
Nursery establishment and seedling production
Seedling plantation
Agro forestry
Mulching of degraded area
Area closure/woodlots|Improved land productivity and soil fertility|\n|Water pan/pond construction
Sand dam construction
Shallow well construction
Micro dam construction
Drainage and irrigation canal construction
Stream diversion
Spring development|Improved access to drinking and irrigation
water and increased water recharge into the
aquifer|\n|Roads and bridges
Market sheds and pavements
Stock routes|Improved market infrastructure|\n|Vegetative fencing and fodder belt
Conservation measures|Increased availability of fodder|\n|Repairing classrooms and health facilities
Build latrines
Build classrooms and health facilities|Improved health and education facilities|\n|_Prosopis_ management|Improved access to agriculture and pasture
land|\n\n\n\n - **Creation of community asset.** The productive assets created by LIPW will be designed to\nsupport poor households, as well as to benefit the entire community. These assets will help\nthe communities to respond to and build resilience against the negative effects of climate\nchange and other shocks and stresses by helping them diversify risk, enhance their incomes,\nand build their skills and assets.\n\n\n - **Design and implementation approach.** The project would apply an enhanced Food for Asset\n(FFA) design and implementation approach, currently financed by WFP. As such, more labor‐\nintensive subprojects will be selected, with the result that at least 60 percent of each\nsubproject budget allocated to LIPWs will be spent on cash transfers to participants.\nFlexibility will be incorporated in the design to effect the payments/transfer based on both\ndaily wage rate and task‐based rate, depending on the work norm/productive rate adopted\nat the national level. For example, for activities such as nursery management, a daily rate\nwill be applied and for activities such as water pan construction, the national work norm will\n\n\nPage 116 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 118
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\nbe used. The major change to an FFA approach will be the use of improved participatory\nLIPW planning based on multiyear watershed planning principles, which will be conducted\naccording to a clearly defined time frame that will enable the timely implementation of\nsubprojects. Specifically, a multiyear watershed plan will provide a road map for systematic\nand sustainable natural resources management and development. Each year, the annual\nLIPW plan will be drawn from the multiyear watershed plan, which will continue to\nconsolidate and build on the preceding year’s development efforts. Particulars of the design\nand implementation approach will be detailed in the operations manual.\n\n\n - **Women’s need.** LIPW will take into account the special needs of women, and will require\nthat at least 50 percent of LIPW participants are women. To achieve this target, the project\nwill ensure that selected LIPW activities appropriately meet the needs of women. Through\ntheir representation on the community committees, women will also be fully involved in the\ndecision making, including in selecting the types of LIPW activities to be adopted and their\nlocations.\n\n\n**Key Design and Implementation Consideration**\n\n\n3. Given the complex dynamics of the region and the need to ensure that LIPWs are effective in their\nintended purpose, the following are some key recommendations that will inform the design of the\noperational guidelines for the DRDIP II and facilitate planning and implementation of sustainable assets\nthat will ensure potential benefits are fully realized.\n\n\n - **Sensitization.** There is a need to sensitize political leaders, line ministries staff, and\ncommunities on the objective and principles of LIPW. To ensure LIPW subprojects’\nsustainability and county government support, the DRDIP II should be integrated into the\ncounty development plans, to the extent possible.\n\n\n - **Joint program planning and implementation modalities.** The program planning and\nimplementation modalities for LIPWs will be jointly discussed and agreed between the\nrespective county governments, WFP, and the World Bank, as the main partners of LIPW\nactivities in the target areas. This will include modalities, wage rates, and payment\nmodalities, among others. Moreover, a common planning and implementation guidelines\nwill be developed with all relevant stakeholders based on existing government standards,\nnorms, and FFA planning principles. These design guidelines will be made available for all\nsubprojects/assets that will be implemented under the DRDIP II. Existing work norms in use\nby FFA will be revised accordingly to cover all LIPW‐related activities.\n\n\n - **Selection of assets.** Priority will be given to improve the assets already constructed in target\nareas before new assets are considered. 41F [42] Adequate technical assessments of proposed\nLIPW activities will be undertaken before construction takes place. A watershed‐based\n\n\n42 This is especially important for water pans given their relevance to the environment of the target counties, as they are unable\nto store water in their current design because of technical inadequacies.\n\n\nPage 117 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 119
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\napproach will be adopted in planning and implementation to ensure sustainability of assets\ncreated and delivery of intended benefit.\n\n\n - **Gradual expansion and seasonality.** Implementation will proceed in a gradual manner,\nstarting first at a small scale, and then expanding based on lessons learned, to enable\nadequate systems to be put in place for effective implementation under the DRDIP II. This\nwill include an appropriate mechanism for payment of cash transfers to beneficiaries and an\nadequate MIS to capture key data from LIPW. The implementation cycle (planning, appraisal,\napproval, disbursement, and implementation) will make sure that implementation takes\nplace during the lean agriculture period and does not interfere with basic agriculture\noperation of the respective community.\n\n\n - **Implementing capacity.** While the current FFA implementation arrangement appears to be\nworking well, there is nonetheless a need to strengthen the existing capacity of the\ngovernment staff at different levels through training and provision of funds for office\nfacilities and field supervision, including transport. Supervision and monitoring will also be\nimportant and will require adequate dedicated resources. To the extent possible, LIPW\nimplementation arrangements will build on existing arrangement through consultation,\ncoordination, and collaboration with all relevant parties.\n\n\n - **Community‐driven approach.** The project will ensure that the communities are in charge of\ntheir LIPW subprojects/assets and are effectively empowered to participate in the decision‐\nmaking process, including on selection of beneficiaries and identification and prioritization\nof LIPW activities. Moreover, operation and maintenance plans for the assets will be created\ntogether with the communities to ensure that they are feasible and in line with existing\ncapacity on the ground. This will be a prerequisite to approving communities’ LIPW plans.\n\n\n - **Watershed development approach.** To realize outcomes relating mainly to natural resource\nmanagement, a watershed development approach will be pursued such that\nimplementation of activities progresses in a logical and environmentally sequential manner.\nWhat can be improved at the household level is closely linked with what can be done on a\nlarger watershed level—downstream effects of upslope activities can only be avoided by\nusing a watershed development approach.\n\n\n**Key Risks**\n\n\n4. There are a number of key risks that will be considered as the arrangement for implementation\nof LIPW under the DRDIP II are finalized. These risks will also be considered and monitored throughout\nimplementation to ensure success of LIPWs. These risks include the following:\n\n\n - **Inadequate capacity for implementation and monitoring.** Given the lack of adequate\nimplementation capacity, careful consideration will be given to implementing arrangements\nand how the capacity gaps would be filled. Monitoring of LIPW will be a key aspect for\nconsideration in the design of LIPWs.\n\n\nPage 118 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 120
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n - **Fiduciary risks related to payment to beneficiaries.** Currently, there are no established cash\npayment transfer mechanisms for FFA activities, as payments are made through food\nvouchers. To minimize fiduciary risks, the project will carefully consider the appropriate\nmechanism for making payments to beneficiaries. There are existing experiences that could\nbe built on, but these will be examined for appropriateness in establishing an adequate and\nfeasible payment system for LIPW beneficiaries in the target areas. 42F [43]\n\n\n - **Operational systems for implementation.** Related to above, the operational systems\nneeded for implementation, including a MIS to capture data on LIPW and its beneficiaries\nwill be carefully designed.\n\n\n - **Overlap and duplication of existing interventions.** The coordination of project‐supported\nLIPW initiatives with existing interventions, including the NSNP and the FFA, will be a key\npriority. Consideration will be given to the potential to link the MIS to the existing Single\nRegistry for the NSNP to minimize the risk of overlap and duplication, as above.\n\n\n - **Insufficient time for project implementation.** It is expected that actual transfer of wages as\npart of LIPW interventions will not commence immediately as critical operational systems\nfor implementation will first need to be developed, particularly related to a payment transfer\nmechanism and a MIS. Therefore, for LIPW interventions under the DRDIP II to have\nmeaningful impact, sufficient time will be given for establishment of operational systems\nand implementation of LIPWs.\n\n\n43 For example, the National Safety Net Project currently uses two different payment service providers—Equity Bank and Kenya\nCommercial Bank—for payment to beneficiaries who could be considered for the LIPWs. WFP is using mobile money transfers\nthrough Safaricom for food supplies which can be purchased from preselected vendors.\n\n\nPage 119 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 121
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nDevelopment Response to Displacement Impacts Project (DRDIP) in the Horn of Africa (P161067)\n\n\n**ANNEX 8: MAP**\n\n\n\nPage 120 of 120\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/598591493431258373/pdf/Kenya-Hon-Africa-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 122
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file