diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_102/raw/doc_102_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_102/raw/doc_102_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_102/raw/doc_102_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,3584 @@
+[
+    {
+        "input_text": "Document of\n# The World Bank\n\nFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY\n\nReport No: PAD2077\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\nON\n\nPROPOSED CREDITS\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF EURO 248.1 MILLION\n(US$263 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\nAND\n\nSDR 27.4 MILLION\n(US$37 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\nTO THE\n\nREPUBLIC OF KENYA\n\nFOR THE\n\nWATER AND SANITATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT\n\nApril 5, 2017\n\nWater Global Practice\nAfrica Region\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the\nperformance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World\nBank authorization.\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                0
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n(Exchange Rate Effective February 28, 2017)\n\nCurrency Unit = Kenya Shillings (KSh)\nKSh 102.8 = US$1\nSDR 0.73861244 = US$1\nEuro 0.9431293 = US$1\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJuly 1                     - June 30\n\nABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS\n\nAF Additional Financing\nAFD _Agence Française de Développement_ (French Development Agency)\nAWSB Athi Water Services Board\nCBK Central Bank of Kenya\nCLTS Community-led Total Sanitation\nCRWSCRP Coastal Region Water Security and Climate Resilience Project\nCWSB Coast Water Services Board\nDA Designated Account\nDMA District Metered Areas\nESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment\nESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework\nFM Financial Management\nGDP Gross Domestic Product\nICB International Competitive Bidding\nIDA International Development Association\nIFR Interim Financial Report\nIPF Investment Project Financing\nIPP Indigenous People’s Plan\nIRR Internal Rate of Return\nIUWM Integrated Urban Water Management\nKfW _Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau_ (Credit Institute for Reconstruction)\nKISIP Kenya Informal Settlements Improvement Project\nKIWASCO Kilifi Water and Sewerage Company\nKPWF Kenya Pooled Water Fund\nKSh Kenya Shillings\nKWAWASCO Kwale Water and Sewerage Company\nKWSCRP Kenya Water Security and Climate Resilience Project\nM&E Monitoring and Evaluation\nMAWASCO Malindi Water and Sewerage Company\nMOWASCO Mombasa Water Supply and Sanitation Company\nMTP2 Second Medium-Term Plan\nMWI Ministry of Water and Irrigation\nNCB National Competitive Bidding\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                1
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "NPV Net Present Value\nNRW Non-revenue Water\nNT National Treasury\nO&M Operations and Maintenance\nOAG Office of the Auditor General\nOBA Output Based Aid\nPBF Performance-based Financing\nPCR Physical Cultural Resources\nPCU Project Coordination Unit\nPDO Project Development Objective\nPIM Project Implementation Manual\nPPADA Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act\nRAP Resettlement Action Plan\nRPF Resettlement Policy Framework\nSA Social Assessment\nSBD Standard Bidding Document\nSDG Sustainable Development Goal\nSoE Statement of Expenditure\nSUF Scale-Up Facility\nTA Technical Assistance\nTAVEVO Taita Taveta Water and Sewerage Company\nUNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization\nUNHCR United Nations High Commission on Refugees\nUNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund\nVMG Vulnerable and Marginalized Group\nWA Withdrawal Application\nWAJWASCO Wajir Water and Sewerage Company\nWASREB Water Services Regulatory Board\nWaSSIP Water and Sanitation Services Improvement Project\nWSDP Water and Sanitation Development Project\nWSB Water Services Board\nWSP Water Services Provider\nWTP Water Treatment Plant\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Makhtar Diop\nCountry Director: Diarietou Gaye\nSenior Global Practice Director: Guang Zhe Chen\nPractice Manager: Jonathan S. Kamkwalala\nTask Team Leader: Andreas Rohde\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                2
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**REPUBLIC OF KENYA**\n\n**WATER AND SANITATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT**\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n**Page**\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................1**\n\n\nA. Country Context ............................................................................................................ 1\n\nB. Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................. 2\n\nC. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes .......................................... 7\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE ..................................................................8**\n\n\nA. Project Development Objective .................................................................................... 8\n\nProject Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................... 8\n\nPDO Level Results Indicators ............................................................................................. 8\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................9**\n\n\nA. Project Components ...................................................................................................... 9\n\nB. Project Financing ........................................................................................................ 10\n\nC. Lessons learned and Reflected in the Project Design ................................................. 11\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................12**\n\n\nA. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ........................................................ 12\n\nB. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 14\n\nC. Sustainability............................................................................................................... 15\n\nD. Role of Partners ........................................................................................................... 15\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS ......................................................................................................................15**\n\n\nA. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks .................................................... 15\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY ..............................................................................................17**\n\n\nA. Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................... 17\n\nB. Technical ..................................................................................................................... 19\n\nC. Financial Management ................................................................................................ 20\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                3
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "D. Procurement ................................................................................................................ 21\n\nE. Environment and Social (including Safeguards) ........................................................ 22\n\nF. Citizen Engagement .................................................................................................... 24\n\nG. Climate Mitigation and Adaption Co-benefits ............................................................ 24\n\nH. World Bank Grievance Redress .................................................................................. 25\n\n\n**ANNEXES**\n\n\nAnnex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring.............................................................................. 26\nAnnex 2: Detailed Project Description ......................................................................................... 33\nAnnex 3: Implementation Arrangements ...................................................................................... 53\nAnnex 4: Implementation Support Plan ........................................................................................ 79\nAnnex 5: Financial and Economic Analysis ................................................................................. 81\nAnnex 6: Map ............................................................................................................................... 92\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                4
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": ".\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n**PAD DATA SHEET**\n\n_Kenya_\n\n_Water and Sanitation Development Project (P156634)_\n\n**PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT**\n\n\n_AFRICA_\n\n_Water Global Practice_\n\n\nReport No.: PAD2077\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|.<br>Basic Information|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Project ID|Project ID|Project ID|Project ID|Project ID|EA Category|EA Category|EA Category|Team Leader(s)|Team Leader(s)|\n|P156634|P156634|P156634|P156634|P156634|B - Partial Assessment|B - Partial Assessment|B - Partial Assessment|Andreas Rohde|Andreas Rohde|\n|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Lending Instrument|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ]|\n|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Investment Project Financing|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|Financial Intermediaries [ ]|\n||||||Series of Projects [ ]|Series of Projects [ ]|Series of Projects [ ]|Series of Projects [ ]|Series of Projects [ ]|\n|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation Start Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|Project Implementation End Date|\n|April 26, 2017|April 26, 2017|April 26, 2017|April 26, 2017|April 26, 2017|April 30, 2022|April 30, 2022|April 30, 2022|April 30, 2022|April 30, 2022|\n|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|Expected Effectiveness Date<br>Expected Closing Date|\n|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|August 31, 2017<br>October 31, 2022|\n|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|Joint IFC<br> <br>|\n|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|No<br> <br>|\n|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|Practice<br>Manager/Manager<br>Senior Global Practice<br>Director<br>Country Director<br>Regional Vice President|\n|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|Jonathan S.<br>Kamkwalala<br>Guang Zhe Chen<br>Diarietou Gaye<br>Makhtar Diop|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|Borrower: Government of the Republic of Kenya|\n|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|Responsible Agency: Ministry of Water and Irrigation|\n|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|Contact:<br>Lawrence Simitu<br>Title:<br>Director Water Services|\n|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|Telephone No.:<br>2540202716103<br>Email:<br>lawsimitu@yahoo.com|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|**Project Financing Data (in US$, Millions)**|\n|[ ]|Loan|[ ]|[ ]|IDA Grant|IDA Grant|[ ]|Guarantee|Guarantee|Guarantee|\n|[ X ]|Credit|[ ]|[ ]|Grant|Grant|[ ]|Other|Other|Other|\n|Total Project Cost:|Total Project Cost:|Total Project Cost:|330.00|330.00|330.00|330.00|Total Bank Financing:|Total Bank Financing:|300.00|\n|Financing Gap:|Financing Gap:|Financing Gap:|00.00|00.00|00.00|00.00||||\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n\n\ni\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "PAD DATA SHEET",
+                    "confidence": 0.9708978533744812,
+                    "start": 4,
+                    "end": 7
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "Report",
+                    "confidence": 0.5997372269630432,
+                    "start": 30,
+                    "end": 31
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Expected Closing Date",
+                    "confidence": 0.6848133206367493,
+                    "start": 453,
+                    "end": 456
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Project Financing Data",
+                    "confidence": 0.9973462820053101,
+                    "start": 1941,
+                    "end": 1944
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "US$",
+                    "confidence": 0.7146064639091492,
+                    "start": 1946,
+                    "end": 1948
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Project Financing Data",
+                    "confidence": 0.9998729228973389,
+                    "start": 1956,
+                    "end": 1959
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "US$",
+                    "confidence": 0.8302930593490601,
+                    "start": 1961,
+                    "end": 1963
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Total Project Cost",
+                    "confidence": 0.7765500545501709,
+                    "start": 2143,
+                    "end": 2146
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Total Bank Financing",
+                    "confidence": 0.5134957432746887,
+                    "start": 2179,
+                    "end": 2182
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                5
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "ii\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                6
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Financing Source|Col2|Col3|Col4|Amount|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|BORROWER/RECIPIENT|30.00|30.00|30.00|30.00|30.00|30.00|30.00|\n|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|International Development Association (IDA)|37.00|37.00|37.00|37.00|37.00|37.00|37.00|\n|IDA Scale Up Facility (IDA-SUF)|IDA Scale Up Facility (IDA-SUF)|IDA Scale Up Facility (IDA-SUF)|IDA Scale Up Facility (IDA-SUF)|263.00|263.00|263.00|263.00|263.00|263.00|263.00|\n|Total<br>|Total<br>|Total<br>|Total<br>|330.00|330.00|330.00|330.00|330.00|330.00|330.00|\n|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|. <br>**Expected Disbursements (in US$, Millions)**|\n|Fiscal Year|2017|2018|2019|2019|2020|2020|2021|2021|2022|2023|\n|Annual|0.00|<br>20.00|45.00|45.00|65.00|65.00|85.00|85.00|75.00|10.00|\n|Cumulative|0.00|<br>20.00|65.00|65.00|130.00|130.00|215.00|215.00|290.00|300.00|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|**Institutional Data**|\n|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|**Practice Area (Lead)**|\n|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|Water|\n|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|**Contributing Practice Areas**|\n|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice|\n|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|**Proposed Development Objective(s)**|\n|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal<br>and northeastern regions in Kenya.|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|**Components**|\n|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Component Name**|**Cost (US$, Millions)**|**Cost (US$, Millions)**|**Cost (US$, Millions)**|**Cost (US$, Millions)**|**Cost (US$, Millions)**|\n|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply<br>and sanitation services in the coastal region|176.00|176.00|176.00|176.00|176.00|\n|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in<br>underserved northeastern counties|110.00|110.00|110.00|110.00|110.00|\n|Component 3: National performance-based financing|Component 3: National performance-based financing|Component 3: National performance-based financing|Component 3: National performance-based financing|Component 3: National performance-based financing|Component 3: National performance-based financing|40.70|40.70|40.70|40.70|40.70|\n|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|Component 4: Project management <br>3.30<br>|\n|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|. <br>**Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool (SORT)**|\n|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Risk Category**|**Rating**|**Rating**|**Rating**|\n|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|1. Political and Governance|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|\n|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|2. Macroeconomic|Moderate|Moderate|Moderate|\n|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|3. Sector Strategies and Policies|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|\n|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|4. Technical Design of Project or Program|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|\n|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|5. Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability|High|High|High|\n|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|6. Fiduciary|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|\n|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|7. Environment and Social|Moderate|Moderate|Moderate|\n\n\niii\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "IDA Scale Up Facility",
+                    "confidence": 0.7847048044204712,
+                    "start": 172,
+                    "end": 176
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "US$",
+                    "confidence": 0.6143370866775513,
+                    "start": 292,
+                    "end": 294
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+                    "confidence": 0.801474928855896,
+                    "start": 288,
+                    "end": 290
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "US$",
+                    "confidence": 0.7166718244552612,
+                    "start": 292,
+                    "end": 294
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+                    "confidence": 0.8815503120422363,
+                    "start": 306,
+                    "end": 308
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "US$",
+                    "confidence": 0.6768752336502075,
+                    "start": 310,
+                    "end": 312
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Expected Disbursements",
+                    "confidence": 0.7668250799179077,
+                    "start": 450,
+                    "end": 452
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Institutional Data",
+                    "confidence": 0.9925393462181091,
+                    "start": 622,
+                    "end": 624
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "Institutional Data",
+                    "confidence": 0.6597021222114563,
+                    "start": 622,
+                    "end": 624
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Proposed Development Objective(s)",
+                    "confidence": 0.5668244957923889,
+                    "start": 1034,
+                    "end": 1040
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Proposed Development Objective",
+                    "confidence": 0.5122816562652588,
+                    "start": 1056,
+                    "end": 1059
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "improve water supply and sanitation services",
+                    "confidence": 0.7252902388572693,
+                    "start": 1163,
+                    "end": 1169
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Proposed Development Objective",
+                    "confidence": 0.5192700624465942,
+                    "start": 1067,
+                    "end": 1070
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Project Development Objective",
+                    "confidence": 0.8493881225585938,
+                    "start": 1211,
+                    "end": 1214
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "improve water supply and sanitation services",
+                    "confidence": 0.6515628695487976,
+                    "start": 1219,
+                    "end": 1225
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Project Development Objective",
+                    "confidence": 0.5013226270675659,
+                    "start": 1239,
+                    "end": 1242
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Project Development Objective",
+                    "confidence": 0.8999068737030029,
+                    "start": 1351,
+                    "end": 1354
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "improve water supply and sanitation services",
+                    "confidence": 0.7202423810958862,
+                    "start": 1359,
+                    "end": 1365
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Component 1",
+                    "confidence": 0.510495126247406,
+                    "start": 1656,
+                    "end": 1658
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "coastal region",
+                    "confidence": 0.8377785682678223,
+                    "start": 1674,
+                    "end": 1676
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "National performance-based financing",
+                    "confidence": 0.7196522355079651,
+                    "start": 1935,
+                    "end": 1938
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "performance-based financing",
+                    "confidence": 0.7284213304519653,
+                    "start": 1950,
+                    "end": 1952
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Component 4: Project management",
+                    "confidence": 0.6451901793479919,
+                    "start": 2010,
+                    "end": 2015
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool",
+                    "confidence": 0.8972699046134949,
+                    "start": 2167,
+                    "end": 2173
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Systematic Operations Risk- Rating Tool",
+                    "confidence": 0.9730595350265503,
+                    "start": 2257,
+                    "end": 2263
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                7
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|8. Stakeholders|Col2|Col3|Col4|Substantial|Col6|Col7|Col8|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|9. Other: Climate Change|9. Other: Climate Change|9. Other: Climate Change|9. Other: Climate Change|Moderate|Moderate|Moderate|Moderate|\n|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|**OVERALL**|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|Substantial|\n|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|. <br>**Compliance**|\n|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|**Policy**|\n|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant respects?|Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant respects?|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?|Does the project require any waivers of Bank policies?|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ X ]|\n|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Have these been approved by Bank management?|Yes [ ]<br>No [ ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ ]|Yes [ ]<br>No [ ]|\n|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Is approval for any policy waiver sought from the Board?|Yes [ ]<br>No [X]|Yes [ ]<br>No [X]|Yes [ ]<br>No [X]|\n|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation?|Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation?|Yes [X]<br>No [ ]|Yes [X]<br>No [ ]|Yes [X]<br>No [ ]|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**|**Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project**|**Yes**|**Yes**|**Yes**|**Yes**|**No**|\n|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01|X|X|X|X||\n|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04|X|X|X|X||\n|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|Forests OP/BP 4.36|||||X|\n|Pest Management OP 4.09|Pest Management OP 4.09|Pest Management OP 4.09|||||X|\n|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11|X|X|X|X||\n|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10|X|X|X|X||\n|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|Involuntary Resettlement OP/BP 4.12|X|X|X|X||\n|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37|X|X|X|X||\n|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|Projects on International Waterways OP/BP 7.50|X|X|X|X||\n|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|Projects in Disputed Areas OP/BP 7.60|||||X|\n|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|.|\n|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|**Legal Covenants**|\n|**Name**|**Recurrent**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Due Date**|**Frequency**|**Frequency**|\n|National<br>Project<br>Steering<br>Committee.<br>Schedule 2, Section I, A. 1 of the Financing<br>Agreement.|<br> <br>|February 28, 2018|February 28, 2018|February 28, 2018|February 28, 2018|||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain throughout<br>the project implementation period, a national steering committee, which shall be co-chaired by the Cabinet<br>Secretary of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MWT) and the Chair of the committee in charge of water<br>affairs in Council of Governors; with composition satisfactory to the Association, including,_inter alia,_principal<br>secretaries from the relevant line ministries and governors of the Participating Counties, to be responsible for<br>overall oversight and policy guidance to the project, and approving the project’s annual work plans budgets.|\n\n\niv\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                8
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Name|Col2|Recurrent|Col4|Due Date|Col6|Col7|Frequency|Col9|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Technical Committee. Schedule 2, Section I, A.<br>2 of the Financing Agreement.|Technical Committee. Schedule 2, Section I, A.<br>2 of the Financing Agreement.|<br>|<br>|February 28, 2018|February 28, 2018|February 28, 2018|||\n|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|**Description of Covenant**|\n|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|The Recipient shall establish, by not later than six months after the effective date, and thereafter maintain<br>throughout the project implementation period, a technical committee, which shall be chaired by the Water<br>Secretary from MWI, with composition satisfactory to the Association, including_ inter alia,_theChief<br>Executive Officer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern<br>Water Services Boards and of WASREB, county executive committee members representing in charge<br>of water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. <br>.|\n|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|<br>**Conditions**|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA SUF|Subsidiary agreement. Article V, 5.01 (a) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Subsidiary agreement. Article V, 5.01 (a) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Subsidiary agreement. Article V, 5.01 (a) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Subsidiary agreement. Article V, 5.01 (a) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Subsidiary agreement. Article V, 5.01 (a) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|\n|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|**Description of Condition**|\n|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|The Subsidiary Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity.|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA SUF|Financing Agreement. Article V, 5.01 (b) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Financing Agreement. Article V, 5.01 (b) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Financing Agreement. Article V, 5.01 (b) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Financing Agreement. Article V, 5.01 (b) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Financing Agreement. Article V, 5.01 (b) of IDA<br>SUF Financing Agreement.|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|\n|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its effectiveness<br>(other than the effectiveness of the IDA SUF Financing) have been fulfilled.|\n|**Source of Funds**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Name**|**Type**|**Type**|**Type**|\n|IDA Credit|Financing Agreement. Article IV, 4.01 of IDA<br>Financial Agreement|Financing Agreement. Article IV, 4.01 of IDA<br>Financial Agreement|Financing Agreement. Article IV, 4.01 of IDA<br>Financial Agreement|Financing Agreement. Article IV, 4.01 of IDA<br>Financial Agreement|Financing Agreement. Article IV, 4.01 of IDA<br>Financial Agreement|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|Effectiveness|\n|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|The IDA SUF Financing Agreement has been executed and delivered and all conditions precedent to its<br>effectiveness (other than the effectiveness of the IDA Financing) have been fulfilled.|\n|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|**Team Composition**|\n|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|**Bank Staff**|\n|**Name**|**Role**|**Role**|**Title**|**Title**|**Specialization**|**Specialization**|**Specialization**|**Unit**|\n|Andreas Rohde|Team Leader<br>(ADM<br>Responsible)|Team Leader<br>(ADM<br>Responsible)|Sr Sanitary<br>Engineer|Sr Sanitary<br>Engineer||||GWA09|\n|Carmen Yee Batista|Team Member|Team Member|Sr. Water and<br>Sanitation<br>Specialist|Sr. Water and<br>Sanitation<br>Specialist||||GWA01|\n|Aissata Z. Zerbo|Procurement<br>Specialist (ADM<br>Responsible)|Procurement<br>Specialist (ADM<br>Responsible)|Senior Procurement<br>Specialist|Senior Procurement<br>Specialist||||GGO07|\n\n\nv\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                9
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Josephine Kabura Kamau|Col2|Financial<br>Management<br>Specialist|Col4|Sr Financial<br>Management<br>Specialist|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|GGO31|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|Dawit Tadesse Mekonnen|Dawit Tadesse Mekonnen|Team Member|Team Member|Program Assistant|Program Assistant|Program Assistant|||GWA01|\n|Marjorie Mpundu|Marjorie Mpundu|Lawyer|Lawyer|Senior Counsel|Senior Counsel|Senior Counsel|||LEGAM|\n|Edward Felix Dwumfour|Edward Felix Dwumfour|Safeguards<br>Specialist|Safeguards<br>Specialist|Senior<br>Environmental<br>Specialist|Senior<br>Environmental<br>Specialist|Senior<br>Environmental<br>Specialist|Environmental<br>Safeguards|Environmental<br>Safeguards|GEN01|\n|James N. Karuiru|James N. Karuiru|Team Member|Team Member|Consultant|Consultant|Consultant|||GSU13|\n|Josephine Osea|Josephine Osea|Team Member|Team Member|Program Assistant|Program Assistant|Program Assistant|||AFCE2|\n|Pascaline Wanjiku Ndungu|Pascaline Wanjiku Ndungu|Co-TTL|Co-TTL|Water & Sanitation<br>Specialist|Water & Sanitation<br>Specialist|Water & Sanitation<br>Specialist|||GWA01|\n|Wendy S. Ayres|Wendy S. Ayres|Team Member|Team Member|Economist and<br>M&E|Economist and<br>M&E|Economist and<br>M&E|M&E|M&E|GWA01|\n|Smita Misra|Smita Misra|Team Member|Team Member|Lead Water and<br>Sanitation<br>Specialist|Lead Water and<br>Sanitation<br>Specialist|Lead Water and<br>Sanitation<br>Specialist|Institutional<br>Specialist|Institutional<br>Specialist|GWA06|\n|Violette Mwikali Wambua|Violette Mwikali Wambua|Safeguards<br>Specialist|Safeguards<br>Specialist|Consultant|Consultant|Consultant|Social Safeguards|Social Safeguards|GSU07|\n|Maximilian Leo Hirn|Maximilian Leo Hirn|Economist|Economist|Economist|Economist|Economist|Complaints<br>handling|Complaints<br>handling|GWA08|\n|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|**Extended Team**|\n|**Name**|**Name**|**Title**|**Title**|**Title**|**Office Phone**|**Office Phone**|**Office Phone**|**Location**|**Location**|\n|||||||||||\n|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|. <br>**Locations**|\n|**Country**|**First**<br>**Administrative**<br>**Division**|**First**<br>**Administrative**<br>**Division**|**Location**|**Location**|**Location**|**Planned**|**Actual**|**Comments**|**Comments**|\n|Kenya|Counties|Counties|Kilifi, Mombasa,<br>Kwale, Taita<br>Taveta, Wajir,<br>Garissa, others|Kilifi, Mombasa,<br>Kwale, Taita<br>Taveta, Wajir,<br>Garissa, others|Kilifi, Mombasa,<br>Kwale, Taita<br>Taveta, Wajir,<br>Garissa, others|X||||\n\n\n.\n\n\nvi\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                10
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "I. **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n\n**A.** **Country Context**\n\n\n1. **Although Kenya has experienced strong economic growth in recent years, its**\n**structural transformation is not complete.** Growth of gross domestic product (GDP) averaged\n5.3 percent during 2004–2014. In 2014, the rebasing of Kenya’s national accounts resulted in an\nupward revision of the GDP per capita and reclassification of Kenya as a lower-middle-income\ncountry. In 2015, GDP grew by 5.6 percent, driven primarily by public investment in\ninfrastructure, higher private sector investment, and strong consumer demand. Kenya’s GDP grew\nby 5.9 percent in 2016, exceeding the regional average for the eighth consecutive year. Despite\noverall economic growth, agriculture remains an important sector of the economy, contributing 30\npercent of GDP in 2015, up from 26 percent in 2011. [1] Services account for about 50 percent of\nGDP and manufacturing for about 10 percent of GDP down from 12 percent in 2011. Kenya’s\neconomic growth is driven mainly by services (predominantly based in cities), especially financial\nservices (8.7 percent), information and communication (7.3 percent), and transport and storage\n(7.1 percent) subsectors. However, despite the strength of Kenya’s private sector, the economy\ncontinues to perform below its potential due to infrastructure bottlenecks, a poor and deteriorating\nbusiness environment, outdated agricultural and trade policies, and recurrent droughts. In the\ncoming decades, the structural transformation of the Kenyan economy is expected to continue,\ncoupled with rapid demographic growth and increasing population and economic density.\n\n\n2. **Poverty remains high** . Economic growth has created a growing middle class, but poverty\nrates remain high. Some 42 percent of the population lives below the national poverty line, the\nvast majority in rural areas. Poor households are more likely than the non-poor to depend on\nincome and consumption from crops and livestock.\n\n\n3. **Economic growth has been accompanied by rapid urbanization, leading to growing**\n**gaps in service provision** . In 2014, about 25 percent of the Kenyan population was residing in\nurban areas and the total urban population was estimated to be about 15.2 million people. [2] It is\nforecast that in 2050, the population of Kenya will have reached about 80 million people, of which\nhalf will reside in cities. But urban services are not keeping pace with urban population growth,\nwith demand for services far outstripping supply in most urban areas. Authorities are unable to\nkeep pace with the growing demand for services because of inadequate financing for capital\ninvestments; insufficient capacity for planning, operating, and maintaining urban infrastructure\nand services; and institutional fragmentation.\n\n\n4. **Economic growth, urbanization, and ongoing droughts are placing increasing**\n**pressure on Kenya’s limited water resources.** Kenya is classified as a chronically ‘water scarce’\ncountry in absolute and relative terms. The country’s annual freshwater availability of 526 cubic\nmeters per capita places it in the bottom 8 percent of countries globally. Over 80 percent of the\ncountry is arid or semiarid lands. A further complicating factor is that approximately 54 percent of\nKenya’s water resources are shared with neighboring countries. Severe degradation of the\ncountry’s key water catchment areas, due primarily to deforestation and unsuitable agricultural\n\n1 Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2016. “Economic Survey 2016.”\n2 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2014. _World Urbanization_\n_Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights._ ST/ESA/SER.A/352. New York.\n\n\n1\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "national accounts",
+                    "confidence": 0.7984158992767334,
+                    "start": 75,
+                    "end": 77
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.9973658919334412,
+                    "start": 25,
+                    "end": 26
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.5604857802391052,
+                    "start": 97,
+                    "end": 98
+                },
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2004–2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.6478661298751831,
+                    "start": 62,
+                    "end": 65
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "urban services",
+                    "confidence": 0.5112076997756958,
+                    "start": 476,
+                    "end": 478
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.9560697674751282,
+                    "start": 458,
+                    "end": 459
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2050",
+                    "confidence": 0.9742034673690796,
+                    "start": 453,
+                    "end": 454
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Economic Survey 2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.9165834188461304,
+                    "start": 670,
+                    "end": 673
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "named",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "Survey",
+                    "confidence": 0.610824704170227,
+                    "start": 671,
+                    "end": 672
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Kenya National Bureau of Statistics",
+                    "confidence": 0.8134264349937439,
+                    "start": 661,
+                    "end": 666
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.9053794741630554,
+                    "start": 630,
+                    "end": 631
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.9671096801757812,
+                    "start": 667,
+                    "end": 668
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                11
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "practices, has exacerbated the situation. At the subnational level the spatial mismatch between\nwater availability and rising demands, is in many cases, even more extreme, with areas around the\nmajor cities of Nairobi, Mombasa, and some western Kenya urban centers most critically water\nstressed. Kenya also suffers from frequent droughts, and as of early 2017 was facing a severe\ndrought. On February 10, 2017, Kenya’s President declared a national disaster as a result of the\nongoing drought and famine that is affecting the poorest counties located in the arid and semi-arid\nlands.\n\n\n5. **Kenya’s urbanization is taking place within a major shift toward political, fiscal, and**\n**administrative devolution** . The 2010 constitution provides for two autonomous but\ninterdependent levels of government: national and 47 county governments with mainly elected\nassemblies, elected governors, and governor-appointed cabinet members ratified by the assembly.\nThe constitution eliminated the previous third tier of government, the urban and rural local\nauthorities, and transferred their revenues and functions to the county governments. With a\nguaranteed unconditional transfer of national revenue, called the ‘equitable share,’ the county\ngovernments are expected to address local needs for devolved services, including water and\nsanitation services. The institutional arrangements in the context of devolution are still evolving,\nincluding intergovernmental structures and mechanisms for intergovernmental cooperation and\ntransfer of resources to deliver on policy priorities. For example, some counties have expressed a\ndesire to work with the existing water services boards (WSBs), while others are developing\nalternative arrangements for cross-county infrastructure development.\n\n\n**B.** **Sectoral and Institutional Context**\n\n\n6. **The Kenya Water Act 2002 introduced important reforms in the sector.** It separated\nthe functions of water resource management, asset ownership, water service delivery, policy,\nregulation, and financing; provided for the ring-fencing of revenues within the sector; and\nestablished a framework for utilities and other service providers to move toward cost-reflective\ntariffs. It established eight WSBs—owned by the national government—to develop infrastructure\nin their respective regions. It created commercially-oriented water services providers (WSPs) to\nbe responsible for service delivery under a contract with their WSBs. The Water Act 2002 also\nestablished an independent Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB) tasked with reviewing\nand approving tariff applications and with monitoring and reporting on sector performance.\n\n\n7. **The 2010 constitution brought major reform to the country’s institutional setup and**\n**thus a need for new water legislation** . The constitution shifted many of the functions formerly\nheld by national ministries to county governments, leaving ministries—including the Ministry of\nWater and Irrigation (MWI)—primarily with policy making, regulatory, and capacity-building\nroles. County governments are now responsible for providing water and sanitation services in the\ncounties (through their WSPs), protecting the environment, and implementing county-specific\npublic works, including for stormwater management. The current WSBs (which will be\ntransformed to water works development agencies) will remain responsible for developing intercounty bulk water systems, but not for county-specific infrastructure. The Water Act 2016, which\nwas approved in September 2016, brings the water legislation in line with the constitution and\nclarifies the roles of the two levels of government and the water institutions. There is also a need\nto develop a new water policy to reflect the changes introduced by the constitution. The World\nBank through the ongoing Kenya Water Security and Climate Resilience Project (KWSCRP,\n\n\n2\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                12
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "P117635) supports the development of this policy and the operationalization of the Water Act 2016\nthrough support to relevant water sector institutions.\n\n\n8. **Provision of urban water and sanitation services has not kept pace with Kenya’s high**\n**urbanization rates** . The urban population rose from about 4 million in 1990 to over 15 million in\n2011. Over the same period, the proportion of the urban population with access to improved water\nsources declined from 92 percent to 82 percent, while the proportion with access to improved\nsanitation (excluding shared sanitation) increased by only 5 percentage points from 26 percent to\n31 percent. Today, only about 18 percent of the urban population is served by a sewerage system.\nExisting wastewater treatment facilities operate at low efficiencies (about 16 percent of design\ncapacity for 15 plants assessed in 2010), leading to discharge of untreated effluents. The\nwastewater in the coastal area is often discharged through inadequate stormwater systems,\nresulting in septic water and sludge spilling into the environment, creating a health hazard for the\nresidents and a threat to the coastal environment.\n\n\n9. **Achieving universal access to improved water and sanitation requires significant**\n**capital expenditure** . The National Water Master Plan 2030 estimates that about US$14 billion in\ninvestment in water supply and US$5.4 billion in urban sewerage infrastructure are needed over\nthe next 15 years. Given that development partners now contribute more than half of financing, a\nsharp increase in mobilizing new sources of financing, including commercial financing for\ncommercially-viable investments, will be required. Thus, achieving the Sustainable Development\nGoal (SDG) of universal access to water and sanitation will require strong institutions, huge\ninvestments, tapping different sources of financing, including commercial financing, much\nimproved operational efficiencies, and innovative technologies.\n\n\n10. **The World Bank is supporting the development of water and sanitation services in**\n**Kenya, some of them supported by other donors** . Currently, the World Bank is supporting the\nKWSCRP, the Coastal Region Water Security and Climate Resilience Project (CRWSCRP,\nP145559); the Water and Sanitation Services Improvement Project (WaSSIP, P096367), and the\nKenya Informal Settlements Improvement Project (KISIP, P113542). It also supports two\nprograms financed with grants from the Global Partnership on Output Based Aid, the Nairobi\nSanitation Project (P131512), and the Urban Water and Sanitation OBA Fund for Low Income\nAreas. Collectively, these are financing major investments in water storage, water and wastewater\ntreatment, trunk water and sewerage infrastructure, distribution networks, and last mile\nconnections. The Water and Sanitation Development Project (WSDP, P156634) builds on and\nscales up the achievements of the ongoing projects. Several development partners are co-financing\nthe World Bank-led projects or supporting complementary activities. The French Development\nAgency ( _Agence Française de Développement_, AFD) is cofinancing WaSSIP and KISIP. The\nGerman bank _Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau_ (KfW) is providing parallel financing for WaSSIP\nand the KWSCRP.\n\n\n11. **The World Bank and development partners are supporting the development of**\n**commercial financing for delivery of water and sanitation services.** With support of the World\nBank, WASREB has introduced a creditworthiness index assessing the financial performance of\nthe larger WSPs and has created and delivered tool kits and best practices on financial management\n(FM) to county governments, the WSPs, and local lenders to facilitate access to commercial\nfinance. The World Bank has also provided technical assistance (TA) to help the WSPs prepare\n\n\n3\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Water Act 2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.6200160384178162,
+                    "start": 13,
+                    "end": 16
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.796230137348175,
+                    "start": 40,
+                    "end": 41
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.9794838428497314,
+                    "start": 15,
+                    "end": 16
+                },
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2010",
+                    "confidence": 0.8444920182228088,
+                    "start": 158,
+                    "end": 159
+                },
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "urban population",
+                    "confidence": 0.7385400533676147,
+                    "start": 54,
+                    "end": 56
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "National Water Master Plan 2030",
+                    "confidence": 0.9642583727836609,
+                    "start": 232,
+                    "end": 237
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2030",
+                    "confidence": 0.9904972314834595,
+                    "start": 236,
+                    "end": 237
+                },
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2030",
+                    "confidence": 0.5818279385566711,
+                    "start": 236,
+                    "end": 237
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "creditworthiness index",
+                    "confidence": 0.9431702494621277,
+                    "start": 613,
+                    "end": 615
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                13
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "investment plans and identify bankable projects and assist banks in evaluating proposals from the\nWSPs. The United States Agency for International Development has established partial credit\nguarantees for three local banks lending to the WSPs. The Government with support from the\nEmbassy of the Netherlands is currently establishing a pooled bond facility to allow the WSPs to\ntap longer-term resources from pension funds and insurance companies. [3] By pooling risk, the\nintention is to increase the volume of commercial financing available, make more efficient use of\ncredit enhancements, and encourage a larger pool of the WSPs to explore commercial financing.\n\n\n12. **The coastal region—which serves as a transport hub and an important tourist**\n**destination** - **is a vital economic region for Kenya and for all of east Africa** . However, the\ncoastal counties face serious challenges in providing water supply and sanitation services to their\nresidents. Mombasa County, which is home to nearly 1 million people, has a huge water deficit of\nover 100,000 cubic meters per day and non-revenue water (NRW) of over 50 percent. The coastal\nregion relies on a bulk water system which connects four main sources—the Baricho wellfield\n(Kilifi County), Mzima springs (Taita Taveta County), and Marere springs and Tiwi boreholes\n(Kwale County)—through about 400 kilometers of pipeline. Under WaSSIP and a project financed\nby the AFD, all four water sources were rehabilitated to sustain and slightly increase the yield of\nthese sources. However, major new source development is needed to address the water shortage.\n\n\n13. **The World Bank is financing investments identified in the water resources**\n**masterplan for the coastal region as the first priority.** WaSSIP is supporting improvements in\nthe operations of the Baricho wellfield and rehabilitation of the pipelines serving Malindi, Kilifi,\nand Mombasa, which were identified as immediate measures in the masterplan. However, these\nmeasures are small and will bring only an additional 28,000 cubic meters per day to these towns.\nThe CRWSCRP is financing the construction of Mwache Dam, which is the second priority\nidentified in the masterplan. This is a multipurpose dam (irrigation and water supply) and is\nexpected to supply 186,000 cubic meters per day to the WSPs in the coastal counties, once fully\noperational (detailed designs for the dam are expected in late 2017 and construction is expected to\nbe complete in June 2022, with full operations to begin a year later). At the time the CRWSCRP\nwas approved, resources from the International Development Association (IDA) were not\navailable for the downstream infrastructure (water treatment, bulk water conveyance, and\ndistribution networks). However, the World Bank made a commitment to finance the downstream\ninfrastructure once funds become available. The proposed WSDP will support the downstream\ninfrastructure for Mwache Dam, in addition to priority investments in water and sanitation in other\ncoastal urban areas.\n\n\n14. **When Mwache Dam becomes fully operational, the coastal region will have sufficient**\n**water supply sources for the medium term** . Water from Mwache Dam will mainly serve\nMombasa, allowing water from the other current sources to serve other urban areas through the\nexisting bulk water system. However, the distribution networks in all the urban areas of the coastal\nregion are dilapidated and will not be able to cope with the increased network pressure. This is\nwhy the World Bank, when committing to support the construction of the Mwache Dam also\n\n\n3 Design work on the pooled fund is continuing with a tentative offering being explored for the fourth quarter of\nfiscal 2017.\n\n\n4\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                14
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "committed to support the rehabilitation of water supply and sanitation networks in the entire\ncoastal region, not only in Mombasa.\n\n\n15. **The ongoing WaSSIP is already financing two service contracts for the bulk water**\n**service provider, which has substantially increased the efficiency of the operation** . The bulk\nwater system is currently operated by the Coast WSB (CWSB), but negotiations between the\ncoastal counties and the national government are underway to establish the most efficient and\neffective mechanism to provide these services in devolved systems. Ultimately, it is expected that\nthe two levels of the Government will agree on a joint authority to manage cross-county operations\nas provided for in the 2010 constitution and the Water Act 2016. The Water and Sanitation\nProgram has been supporting the dialogue between the national and county governments and will\ncontinue to do so.\n\n\n16. **The World Bank is supporting the government’s initiative to boost the economic**\n**Gperformance of its north and northeastern counties.** These counties—which comprise\nMandera, Wajir, Isiolo, Marsabit, Garissa, Tana River, Lamu, Turkana, West Pokot, and\nSamburu—have been historically underserved. Some 80 percent of the residents of the region are\nliving in poverty and have poor access to basic services. Frequent droughts create additional\nvulnerabilities for the population, 90 percent of whom rely on livestock, as large numbers of\nanimals can die during droughts. The World Bank has recently launched the Northeastern\nDevelopment Initiative which is focused on transformative and integrated infrastructure\ninvestments in energy, transport, and water and aims to connect the region to national and global\nmarkets. Climate change poses an additional threat to the already fragile region.\n\n\n17. **The WSDP will support investments in water and sanitation and drought mitigation**\n**measures for selected priority areas in the northeastern counties.** The Frontier Counties\nDevelopment Council, which represents the northeastern counties, together with the national\ngovernment have identified Wajir town (Wajir County) and Dadaab host communities (Garissa\nCounty) as the first priorities, as they are facing critical water supply and sanitation challenges due\nto pollution, depletion of the water resources upon which they rely, and an ongoing drought. Wajir\nand Garissa counties are classified in the alert and alarm stages, respectively, in the current drought\nphase classification.\n\n\n18. **Wajir town is the main urban center and headquarters for Wajir County, with a**\n**population of about 100,000 inhabitants** . The town is experiencing rapid population growth,\nwith commercial developments and more people settling within the core urban center and the periurban areas due to infrastructure development and improved service provision within the town\nsince the establishment of the county government. Wajir is a water-deficient county with no\nperennial rivers. The town has a shallow water table which is diminishing and is also being\ncontaminated with untreated waste water. The main source of water for Wajir town is groundwater\nfrom a shallow aquifer as low as five meters below the ground. Most of the town’s households rely\non shallow hand-dug wells within their compounds from where they draw water through simple\nsystems like containers attached to ropes. Wajir town has an estimated 20,000 shallow wells\nscattered in the entire town, of which only about 1,235 are protected and about 10 percent have\ndried up. Water from these shallow wells is saline and has also shown bacteriological\ncontamination due to lack of a proper sanitation system for the town. As a result, there are frequent\ncholera outbreaks, particularly during the rainy seasons.\n\n\n5\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                15
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "19. **Garissa County hosts a large refugee camp at Dadaab, with over 340,000 people** . In\naddition, about 160,000 inhabitants live within a 50 kilometer radius of the five refugee camps. Of\nthese, about 60,000 inhabitants live in and around the town of Dadaab, many working directly or\nindirectly for the United Nations or nongovernmental organizations that provide services to the\nrefugees. The main source of water for the residents of Dadaab for both the host communities and\nthe refugee camps is groundwater from the Merti aquifer. There are about 56 boreholes supplying\nwater to the host communities. There is concern that the Merti aquifer is becoming depleted in the\nvicinity of Dadaab area, although the status is not clear. Current water systems for the host\ncommunities comprise boreholes, pumps, ground masonry or elevated steel tanks, and some\nreticulation networks and water kiosks. Most of the infrastructure is dilapidated and is in dire need\nof rehabilitation and expansion.\n\n\n20. **The Government of Kenya has expressed its intent to close down the Dadaab refugee**\n**camp complex in a phased manner** . Operational modalities and support measures for the\nvoluntary repatriation of Somali refugees have been articulated in a tripartite agreement between\nthe Government of Kenya, United Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR), and the\nGovernment of Somalia, highlighting safe, dignified, and voluntary return. The Government and\nUNHCR are working closely together to ensure that the current infrastructure in the Dadaab\nrefugee camp complex will be converted for use by the host communities once the camps are\nclosed. The World Bank-financed Kenya Development Response to Displacement Impacts\nProject, which is under preparation, has launched a study to explore options for host communities\nto use the infrastructure. Because the host communities are spread over a wide distance of about\n35 kilometers, all existing boreholes will be required.\n\n\n21. **In Wajir County, about 83 percent of inhabitants defecate in the open; none of the**\n**127 villages has been certified to be open-defecation free** . [4] The 2014 Sanitation Benchmarking\nreport ranked Wajir County 44 out of 47 on sanitation performance, with stunting rates for children\nunder five at 50.7 percent. In Wajir town, about 5 percent of residents depend on septic tanks, 20\npercent use bucket latrines, and 75 percent defecate in the open. [5] The bucket latrine system was\nintroduced to avoid contamination of the shallow aquifer. However, the management of the system\nhas continued to deteriorate with increasing population within the town and its surrounding areas.\nPoor sludge emptying practices by inadequately or entirely untrained personnel, who lack proper\nprotective gear, have contributed to outbreaks of waterborne diseases. For example, between July\nand December 2015, Wajir County reported 2,000 cases of cholera, with more than 30 deaths. [6]\n\n\n22. **In Garissa County, about 77 percent of people defecate in the open, and no single**\n**village has been certified as open-defecation free** . [7] The 2014 Sanitation Benchmarking report\nput the stunting rate in Garissa at approximately 50 percent. Although sanitation statistics do not\nexist for Dadaab and Fafi subcounties as the host communities of the refugee camps, county\nofficials estimate 30 percent latrine coverage and 70 percent open defecation. Sanitation-related\ndisease outbreaks often spread between the refugee camps and the host communities, due to the\n\n\n4 Kenya Rapid (Resilient Arid Lands Partnership for Integrated Development) Baseline Survey Report,\nMillennium Water Alliance (June 2016).\n5 Wajir Town Sewerage Project, Final Design Report. Ministry of Water and Irrigation (2009).\n6 Technical Report on Wajir Cholera Outbreak Response, Ministry of Health, 2015.\n7 Kenya Rapid (Resilient Arid Lands Partnership for Integrated Development) Baseline Survey Report,\nMillennium Water Alliance (June 2016); Ministry of Health/ United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2015.\n\n\n6\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Merti aquifer",
+                    "confidence": 0.6858504414558411,
+                    "start": 102,
+                    "end": 104
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "host communities",
+                    "confidence": 0.6296699047088623,
+                    "start": 114,
+                    "end": 116
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "study",
+                    "confidence": 0.794682502746582,
+                    "start": 319,
+                    "end": 320
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.580108106136322,
+                    "start": 191,
+                    "end": 192
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "Somali refugees",
+                    "confidence": 0.741792619228363,
+                    "start": 225,
+                    "end": 227
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Sanitation Benchmarking\nreport",
+                    "confidence": 0.8177969455718994,
+                    "start": 395,
+                    "end": 398
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Wajir County",
+                    "confidence": 0.8204349279403687,
+                    "start": 358,
+                    "end": 360
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.9828245639801025,
+                    "start": 394,
+                    "end": 395
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "host communities",
+                    "confidence": 0.861362099647522,
+                    "start": 324,
+                    "end": 326
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "bucket latrine system",
+                    "confidence": 0.8003067374229431,
+                    "start": 454,
+                    "end": 457
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Wajir County",
+                    "confidence": 0.6478618383407593,
+                    "start": 358,
+                    "end": 360
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.5467778444290161,
+                    "start": 394,
+                    "end": 395
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "sanitation statistics",
+                    "confidence": 0.8548403978347778,
+                    "start": 597,
+                    "end": 599
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Dadaab and Fafi subcounties",
+                    "confidence": 0.505532443523407,
+                    "start": 603,
+                    "end": 607
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.5059922933578491,
+                    "start": 581,
+                    "end": 582
+                },
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "refugee camps",
+                    "confidence": 0.7296419739723206,
+                    "start": 613,
+                    "end": 615
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Wajir Town Sewerage Project",
+                    "confidence": 0.6130234599113464,
+                    "start": 671,
+                    "end": 675
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "named",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "Report",
+                    "confidence": 0.5227456092834473,
+                    "start": 678,
+                    "end": 679
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Ministry of Water and Irrigation",
+                    "confidence": 0.7242180705070496,
+                    "start": 680,
+                    "end": 685
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.5603905320167542,
+                    "start": 741,
+                    "end": 742
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "refugee camps",
+                    "confidence": 0.5753880739212036,
+                    "start": 613,
+                    "end": 615
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Technical Report on Wajir Cholera Outbreak Response",
+                    "confidence": 0.7977674603462219,
+                    "start": 690,
+                    "end": 697
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Ministry of Health",
+                    "confidence": 0.6053707599639893,
+                    "start": 698,
+                    "end": 701
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.6272228956222534,
+                    "start": 702,
+                    "end": 703
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "refugee camps",
+                    "confidence": 0.5343049168586731,
+                    "start": 636,
+                    "end": 638
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                16
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "frequent interactions of their residents. For example, the 2015 cholera outbreak (index case\nreported in camp), had 1,798 reported cases, of which 719 cases were from the host communities. [8]\n\n\n**C.** **Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes**\n\n\n23. **The proposed WSDP will contribute to the goals of the Government’s Vision 2030**\n**and its Second Medium-Term Plan (MTP2).** The Government’s Kenya Vision 2030 and its\nMTP2 2013–2017 focus on promoting inclusive economic growth and achieving the United\nNation’s SDGs. Aligned to Vision 2030, the MTP2 identifies key policy actions, reforms, and\nprograms that will enable Kenya to achieve accelerated and inclusive economic growth. As a\npriority the Government aims to increase access to clean water and sanitation services in the major\nurban centers and their suburbs, expanding access to the poor in underserved areas, including\ninformal settlements, and strengthening sector institutions. The MTP2 also supports activities to\nensure that devolution is a success, including helping counties develop their capacity to deliver\ninfrastructure and services and improving coordination between the two levels of government.\n\n\n24. **The proposed project is aligned with the World Bank’s Kenya Country Partnership**\n**Strategy 2014** - **2018 (Report number 88940).** The Country Partnership Strategy for Kenya,\ndiscussed by the World Bank’s Board of Directors on June 4, 2014, has three strategic results\nareas: (a) competitiveness and sustainability—growth to eradicate poverty; (b) protection and\npotential—human resource development for delivering shared prosperity; and (c) consistency and\nequity—delivering a devolution dividend. The proposed WSDP supports all three strategic results\nareas supporting the ongoing sector reforms and increasing the equitable access and sustainability\nof water supply and sanitation services. It helps to enhance the competitiveness of one of Kenya’s\nmost important city, Mombasa, by eliminating water shortages and addressing the problems with\nthe discharge of untreated septic sludge and sewage, both of which discourage investment and\ntourism. It will also improve the competitiveness of other cities by helping them meet their needs\nfor adequate water supplies. It assists in bringing water supply and sanitation services to the\nresidents of the underserved northeastern counties, including women and children who bear most\nof the cost of water scarcity. It helps to foster consistency and equity by helping counties develop\nthe capacity to manage their new responsibilities for delivering water and sanitation services.\n\n\n25. **The project supports achievement of the World Bank’s twin goals of eliminating**\n**extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity in several ways** . First, investments in water\ninfrastructure act as catalysts for local development and economic activity, by providing water for\nagriculture, animal husbandry, food processing, and other businesses. Bringing higher quantities\nand more reliable water to households enhances their quality of life by (a) reducing the time and\neffort—especially of women and children—to collect water; (b) reducing the incidents of\nwaterborne diseases caused by contact with contaminated water; and (c) diminishing absenteeism\nfrom work and school and the costs associated with these, including lost income and opportunities.\n\n\n26. **The proposed WSDP will also leverage development impacts of ongoing World Bank**\n**programs and projects** . It will ensure that the CRWSCRP meets its development objectives. It\n\n\n8 County public health officer, Garissa.\n\n\n7\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "2015 cholera outbreak",
+                    "confidence": 0.7063050270080566,
+                    "start": 10,
+                    "end": 13
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.7142519950866699,
+                    "start": 10,
+                    "end": 11
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "MTP2",
+                    "confidence": 0.6651768684387207,
+                    "start": 88,
+                    "end": 89
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.8528896570205688,
+                    "start": 97,
+                    "end": 98
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2013–2017",
+                    "confidence": 0.6471781730651855,
+                    "start": 103,
+                    "end": 106
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "MTP2",
+                    "confidence": 0.6527413725852966,
+                    "start": 192,
+                    "end": 193
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "World Bank",
+                    "confidence": 0.6538290977478027,
+                    "start": 236,
+                    "end": 238
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.8098310828208923,
+                    "start": 240,
+                    "end": 241
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.5849396586418152,
+                    "start": 248,
+                    "end": 249
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "WSDP",
+                    "confidence": 0.7750762701034546,
+                    "start": 334,
+                    "end": 335
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "World Bank",
+                    "confidence": 0.5549798607826233,
+                    "start": 491,
+                    "end": 493
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "WSDP",
+                    "confidence": 0.6419711709022522,
+                    "start": 626,
+                    "end": 627
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "World Bank",
+                    "confidence": 0.6035230159759521,
+                    "start": 491,
+                    "end": 493
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "households",
+                    "confidence": 0.675207793712616,
+                    "start": 555,
+                    "end": 556
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                17
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "will also build on the achievements of WaSSIP in improving performance of the water institutions\nin a devolved context.\n\n\nII. **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE**\n\n\n**A.** **Project Development Objective**\n\n\n27. **The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve water supply and sanitation**\n**services in select coastal and northeastern regions in Kenya.** **[9]** This will be achieved by investing\nin water supply and sanitation infrastructure in urban centers in coastal counties and two counties\nin Kenya’s arid northeastern region. The project will also improve services by strengthening\ninstitutional capacity in areas, such as reducing NRW, improving billing and revenue collection\nsystems, and developing medium-term business plans. In addition, the WSDP will establish a\nresults-based financing mechanism at the national level to provide incentives to the WSPs to\naccelerate access to water supply and sanitation services and improve operational and financial\nperformance.\n\n\n**B.** **Project Beneficiaries**\n\n\n28. **The primary beneficiaries of the WSDP will be the residents of the coastal and**\n**northeastern counties who will receive most of the investments in infrastructure under the**\n**project.** The residents of the coastal counties will benefit from a much more regular supply of\nwater and from improved wastewater and septic sludge collection and treatment services.\nResidents of Wajir town and people living in the communities surrounding the Dadaab refugee\ncamp in Garissa County will benefit from supply of higher-quality water and from more regular\nservices. Both Wajir town residents and Dadaab host communities will also benefit from improved\nsanitation services, including access to on-site sanitation facilities and campaigns for communityled total sanitation (CLTS). WSPs that receive support under the project and their staff will benefit\nfrom TA and investments that strengthen their performance. People living in towns with WSPs\nthat strengthen their capacity to deliver services will benefit in the medium to long term from more\nreliable and efficient water supply and sanitation services.\n\n\n**C.** **PDO Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n29. **Key project outcome indicators include:**\n\n\n    - People in urban areas provided with access to improved water sources under the\nproject (number) (core indicator).\n\n\n    - People provided with access to improved sanitation services under the project—urban\n(number) (core indicator).\n\n\n9 Improved water services means increased access to and reliability of water services. Improved sanitation\nservices means expanded household connections to centralized wastewater systems or on-site sanitation facilities.\n\n\n8\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "NRW",
+                    "confidence": 0.5207569003105164,
+                    "start": 128,
+                    "end": 129
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "WSDP",
+                    "confidence": 0.6708637475967407,
+                    "start": 201,
+                    "end": 202
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "primary"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "PDO Level Results Indicators",
+                    "confidence": 0.934076726436615,
+                    "start": 387,
+                    "end": 391
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "urban areas",
+                    "confidence": 0.7052882313728333,
+                    "start": 408,
+                    "end": 410
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                18
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "    - People benefiting under the project from a connection to the sewage system or from\nimproved septic sludge management (number). [10]\n\n\n    - People with existing connections benefiting from more hours per week of water\nservices (number).\n\n\n    - Direct project beneficiaries (number), of which female (percentage) (core indicator).\n\n\nIII. **PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**A.** **Project Components**\n\n\n30. The proposed WSDP will comprise four components, as presented in the following\nparagraphs. Annex 2 presents a detailed project description.\n\n\n**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services**\n**in the coastal region (US$176 million equivalent, of which IDA Scale-Up Facility (SUF)**\n**US$160 million equivalent)**\n\n_Subcomponent 1.1: Support to coastal counties (US$132 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF_\n_US$120 million equivalent)_\n\n\n31. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to improve water supply\nand sanitation services in urban areas, including (a) construction and rehabilitation of water supply,\nsanitation, and stormwater infrastructure investments including construction or rehabilitation of\noffices for WSPs; and (b) capacity-building and institutional-strengthening activities, including\ncustomer identification surveys, improving billing and collection systems, and NRW reduction, to\nsupport improved water and sanitation performance of the participating county governments and\ntheir WSPs.\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1.2: Support to the coast bulk water services provider (US$44 million equivalent_\n_of which IDA-SUF US$40 million equivalent)_\n\n\n32. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to improve the\ninterconnected coast bulk water system, including (a) construction and rehabilitation of water\nmains and boreholes; (b) TA to the CWSB, including financing a management or service contract\nfor the operation of the coast water bulk system; and (c) partial financing of ongoing construction\ncontracts of water transmission mains from Kakuyuni to Kilifi and from Kakuyuni to Gongoni for\nthe Baricho wellfield.\n\n\n**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved**\n**northeastern counties (US$110 million equivalent, of which IDA US$37 million equivalent**\n**and IDA-SUF US$63 million equivalent)**\n\n\n10 People benefiting from improved septic sludge management are those whose sludge is taken to a sludge\ntreatment facility.\n\n\n9\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                19
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "33. This component will finance a program of activities designed to improve water supply and\nsanitation services in the northeastern counties, such as Wajir town in Wajir County and the\nDadaab refugee camp host communities in Garissa County, such program to include (a)\nconstruction and rehabilitation of water supply, sanitation, and stormwater infrastructure\ninvestments, including construction and rehabilitation of offices for the WSPs; (b) capacitybuilding and institutional strengthening activities of the participating counties and the WSPs,\nincluding NRW reduction, billing and revenue collection systems, and developing and\nimplementing a utility business plan; and (c) operations and maintenance (O&M) of the water\nsupply and sanitation services.\n\n\n**Component 3: National performance-based financing (US$40.7 million equivalent of which**\n**IDA-SUF US$37 million equivalent)**\n\n_Subcomponent 3.1: Support for water and sanitation infrastructure investments and services_\n_(US$38.5 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$35 million equivalent)_\n\n\n34. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to support the preparation\nand implementation of the national performance-based financing (PBF) for participating counties,\nWSBs, and WSPs, including (a) construction of new or rehabilitation of existing water and\nsanitation infrastructure; (b) support toward the preparation of applications, final designs, bidding\ndocuments, and construction supervision; and (c) TA for improving water and sanitation services,\nand monitoring and evaluation (M&E).\n\n\n_Subcomponent 3.2: Technical assistance for national performance-based financing (US$2.2_\n_million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$2 million equivalent)_\n\n\n35. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to strengthen WASREB’s\ncapacity for management, implementation and coordination, and M&E of the National PBF,\nincluding (a) evaluation of proposals (to identify high-return investments and activities); (b)\nestablishment and implementation of a comprehensive M&E system; and (c) provision of training\nto the participating county governments, WSBs and WSPs involved in implementation of\nsubcomponent 3.1 on issues such as implementation of safeguards, procurement, and FM.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project management (US$3.3 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$3**\n**million equivalent)**\n\n\n36. This component will finance a program of activities designed to strengthen the capacity of\nthe Recipient for project management, implementation and coordination, and M&E, including (a)\nestablishment and implementation of a comprehensive M&E system; (b) training of the\nimplementing agencies and county governments on implementation of safeguards, procurement,\nand financial management; and (c) financing studies identified during implementation and\npreparation of follow-up on projects as needed.\n\n\n**B.** **Project Financing**\n\n\n37. **The lending instrument for the proposed WSDP is Investment Project Financing**\n**(IPF).** IPF is the appropriate instrument for the WSDP because it will support activities that require\nintensive design and implementation support of technical, financial, economic, environmental, and\n\n\n10\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                20
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "institutional issues. The support offered by the World Bank under the IPF will also help to ensure\nthat the investments benefit the targeted groups.\n\n\n38. **The WSDP is estimated to cost US$330 million.** The project will be financed through an\nIDA-SUF Credit of US$263 million equivalent and an IDA Credit of US$37 million equivalent.\nThe Government will add US$30 million as counterpart financing. **The Government will be**\n**responsible for budgeting for counterpart financing to cover some operating costs, the**\n**acquisition of land, and any compensation due to project-affected people** . Land and\ncompensation costs associated with proposed subprojects will be identified and budgeted for on\nan annual basis.\n\n\n**Table 1: WSDP Project Costs (US$330 million)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Component 1|IDA|IDA-SUF|Government|Total|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and**<br>**expansion of urban water supply and**<br>**sanitation services in the coastal**<br>**region**||**160.0**|**16.0**|**176.0**|\n|Subcomponent 1.1: Support to the<br>coastal counties||120.0|12.0|132.0|\n|Subcomponent 1.2: Support to the coast<br>bulk water services provider||40.0|4.0|44.0|\n|**Component 2: Expansion of water**<br>**supply and sanitation services in**<br>**underserved northeastern counties**|**37.0**|**63.0**|**10.0**|**110.0**|\n|**Component 3: National performance-**<br>**based financing**||**37.0**|**3.7**|**40.7**|\n|Subcomponent 3.1: Support for water<br>and sanitation infrastructure investments<br>and services||35.0|3.5|38.5|\n|Subcomponent 3.2: Technical assistance<br>for national performance-based<br>financing||2.0|0.2|2.2|\n|**Component 4: Project management**||**3.0**|**0.3**|**3.3**|\n|**Total Project Cost**|**37.0**|**263.0**|**30.0**|**330.0**|\n\n\n**C.** **Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design**\n\n\n39. **Having subprojects ready for implementation helps avoid delays in project execution.**\nThe Kenya portfolio is experiencing problems of slow disbursement, including to some extent the\nWorld Bank-financed water projects. The WSDP builds on the experience of the WaSSIP and\nWaSSIP additional financing (AF), which have been disbursing very well. Investments to be\nfinanced under the WaSSIP AF (designs, bidding documents, and safeguard documents) were\nprepared under the previous project, allowing implementation to proceed as soon as the WaSSIP\nAF became effective. The design of the WSDP reflects this lesson, and the WaSSIP AF is financing\nthe ongoing preparation of studies, designs, bidding documents, and safeguard documents for the\ngreat majority of Components 1 and 2 investments. Some of the detailed technical designs have\nalready completed and most of the others will be completed by effectiveness.\n\n\n11\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                21
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "IV. **IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A.** **Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n40. **Overall responsibility** . The Recipient is the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The\nNational Treasury (NT) will be responsible for ensuring that project resources are budgeted for\nand released. The Office of the Auditor General (OAG) will be responsible for auditing of project\naccounts. The project financing will be a mix of IDA-SUF Credit and an IDA Credit to the NT.\n\n\n41. **Overall implementation arrangements** . The WSDP will be implemented using existing\norganizational structures in line with the constitution, incorporating lessons learned and experience\ngained in the implementation of the KWSCRP and WaSSIP. Thus, counties will implement\ncounty-specific activities, and WSBs (or their legal successors), which are owned by the national\ngovernment, will implement activities that involve more than one county.\n\n\n42. **A National Project Steering Committee, which will be established within six months**\n**after Project effectiveness, will provide overall project oversight, policy guidance, and**\n**approve the project’s annual workplans and budgets** . The Cabinet Secretary of the MWI and\nthe Chair of the Committee in charge of Water Affairs at the Council of Governors will co-chair\nthe steering committee. Other members of the committee will include representatives (at the chief\nexecutive/Principal Secretary level) of the National Treasury, Ministry of Devolution and\nPlanning, and the chief executive of the Council of Governors, governors of the participating\ncounties and any other appropriate representatives identified and appointed by the committee. The\nState Department of Water Services at the MWI and the secretariat of the Council of Governors\nwill provide joint secretariat services to the committee.\n\n\n43. **A Technical Committee, which will be established within six months after Project**\n**effectiveness, will be responsible for addressing any cross-cutting technical issues and**\n**challenges in project implementation.** It will review project progress reports, financial\nmanagement and audit reports, and provide technical guidance on project implementation. The\nWater Secretary at the MWI will chair the committee. Its members will include Chief Executive\nOfficer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern Water\nServices Boards and of WASREB, County Executive Committee members representing in charge\nof water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. The State Department of\nWater Services at the MWI will provide secretariat services to the committee.\n\n\n44. **Executing agency.** The State Department of Water and Sanitation Services in the MWI is\nthe executing agency. A Project Coordination Unit (PCU) has been established and fully staffed.\nThe PCU is responsible for overall project management, and for monitoring and reporting. The\nPCU is headed by a project coordinator who reports to the Principal Secretary through the Water\nSecretary. Given that all participating entities are procuring, implementing, and monitoring their\nown project activities, the PCU is lean and integrated within existing structures. The executing\nagency will be strengthened with teams of consultants who will help to build the capacity of\ncounties and their WSPs for procurement, FM, M&E, safeguards management, and utility reform.\n\n\n45. **Implementing agencies.** Counties and their WSPs will be the main implementing\nagencies, because according to the Water Act 2016, they are responsible for all county water\n\n\n12\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                22
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "supply and sanitation infrastructure and services. WSBs (or their legal successors) will, in future,\nonly be responsible for implementing inter-county activities. Therefore, the CWSB will be the\nimplementing agency for the bulk water subcomponent under Component 1, because the bulk\nwater system runs across four counties. The WSPs will do most of the procurement, because they\nwill be in charge of all procurement for countywide water supply and sanitation infrastructure. The\ncounties will procure contracts to support functions which are not delegated to the WSPs, such as\nenforcing construction codes for septic tanks, and the like. Counties will, therefore, procure small\ncontracts (mostly TA) up to a threshold in accordance with the findings of the procurement\ncapacity assessment for counties. The MWI and WASREB will do any procurement needed to\ncarry out their responsibilities under the project. Each implementing agency will appoint a\ndedicated PCU, headed by a coordinator and including specialists in engineering, procurement,\nFM, environment and social safeguards, and M&E. The staff of the PCU may be delegated from\nthe WSP or the county.\n\n\n**Table 1: Overview of the Implementing Agencies**\n\n|Component|Implementing Agencies|\n|---|---|\n|Subcomponent 1.1| <br>Mombasa County and Mombasa Water and Sanitation Company (MOWASCO)<br> <br>Kwale County and Kwale Water and Sewerage Company (KWAWASCO)<br> <br>Taita Taveta County and Taita Taveta Water and Sewerage Company (TAVEVO)<br> <br>Kilifi County, Kilifi Water and Sewerage Company (KIWASCO), and Malindi Water<br>and Sewerage Company (MAWASCO)|\n|Subcomponent 1.2|CWSB|\n|Component 2| <br>Wajir County and Wajir Water and Sewerage Company (WAJWASCO)<br> <br>Garissa County and Garissa Water and Sewerage Company|\n|Component 3| <br>Various counties and their WSPs. The counties and their WSPs will only be known<br>when WASREB has selected the investments. The selection will be done for annual<br>programs. Therefore, the participating counties and WSPs will change during the<br>project implementation period.<br> <br>WSBs can also apply to WASREB for financing inter-county infrastructure.<br>Therefore, it is also possible that a WSB might become an implementing agency<br>under this component.<br> <br>WASREB will implement activities related to the development and implementation<br>of the program, but will not be engaged in any implementation of infrastructure.|\n|Component 4| <br>MWI|\n\n\n\n46. **The NT will enter into subsidiary agreements with the CWSB and any other WSBs**\n**that are selected under Component 3, and into participation agreements with the**\n**participating counties.** In turn, counties will enter into WSP agreements to ensure that the project\nfunds flow directly to their WSPs to cover expenditures for water supply and sanitation services.\nThe agreements will specify the amount to be allocated to each implementing agency to undertake\nspecific activities and the terms under which counties and WSBs repay the funds to the NT (if\napplicable). Signed subsidiary or participation agreements for each implementing agency are a\ncondition of disbursement to the entity entering into the agreement. The same arrangements will\napply to any implementing agency whose proposals are selected under Component 3.\n\n\n47. **Additional specific implementation arrangements for the PBF component.** WASREB\nwill oversee the activities under the PBF program this component is supporting. WASREB will be\nresponsible for designing and announcing the program, inviting applications, and reviewing\nproposals. However, the MWI will have to approve the program design and periodic changes to it.\n\n\n13\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                23
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "WASREB will also be responsible for reviewing progress of the activities, including approving\nthe financial support for the accepted applications. The MWI will be the budget holder of the funds\nunder this component and, based on the applications accepted by WASREB, will request the NT\nto release the funds to the counties of the WSPs or directly to the WSBs whose applications have\nbeen approved. WASREB will receive TA under the component to conduct independent financial\nand technical audits of the supported activities, review the achievements of the activities, conduct\ntraining for their staff, and provide assistance for applicants to write their proposals. The counties\nand WSBs will be responsible for monitoring activities carried out under the program, including\nreporting progress to WASREB.\n\n\n**B.** **Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n48. **Objectives and design** . The M&E specialists responsible for preparing the project’s\nquarterly progress reports will be part of the WSDP PCU at the MWI. They will be responsible for\nestablishing the M&E system, and training and backstopping M&E specialists at the level of the\nimplementing agencies. They will also prepare quarterly WSDP progress reports, based on the\ninformation from the M&E specialists at the implementing agencies. In addition, they will\ncoordinate the participation of the implementing agencies in a midterm review scheduled for 2019.\n\n\n49. **The main responsibility for monitoring and reporting will be with the implementing**\n**agencies** . The M&E specialists at the implementing agencies will be responsible for monitoring\nand collecting information on implementation progress and contribution of specific activities to\nthe project’s intermediate results and PDO-level outcomes. They will submit quarterly progress\nreports to the M&E specialist at the MWI.\n\n\n50. **Data generation and reporting** . The data to track many of the key performance indicators\nwill come from national sources, the implementing agencies, and from project-specific data\ncollection efforts. The MWI PCU is responsible for submitting quarterly project progress reports\nto the World Bank, and to the relevant government officials at the MWI within 45 days of the end\nof each quarter. The Government and World Bank will discuss the findings of the reports during\neach implementation support mission and agree on actions to address issues raised in the reports.\n\n\n51. **Beneficiary assessment** . Six months prior to the closing of the project, the MWI PCU will\nrecruit an independent firm to conduct a beneficiary assessment. The objective of the beneficiary\nassessment will be to produce information on the benefits of the infrastructure investments and\ncapacity-building support provided under the project. The assessment will review issues such as\nthe relevance of the infrastructure to people living and working in the places that benefited from\nthe investments, the number of people benefiting (disaggregated by gender and vulnerable people),\nand the performance of the relevant agencies in operating and maintaining the infrastructure. The\nassessment will also explore the quality and relevance of the studies in informing the design of the\noverall project interventions and the extent to which the capacity-building support has achieved its\nobjectives.\n\n\n52. **Capacity building for M&E** . Although some of the WSPs have benefited from support\nunder WaSSIP for strengthening capacity for M&E, many have not, and overall capacity for M&E\nis inadequate. The project will provide support to strengthen capacity for the WSPs benefiting\nfrom the project. Specifically, the project will finance consultants who will work with the WSPs\n\n\n14\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "quarterly progress reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.9447058439254761,
+                    "start": 170,
+                    "end": 173
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "M&E specialists",
+                    "confidence": 0.7335177063941956,
+                    "start": 159,
+                    "end": 163
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "M&E system",
+                    "confidence": 0.8925619721412659,
+                    "start": 191,
+                    "end": 195
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "quarterly progress\nreports",
+                    "confidence": 0.7258638739585876,
+                    "start": 319,
+                    "end": 322
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "M&E specialist",
+                    "confidence": 0.5079136490821838,
+                    "start": 324,
+                    "end": 328
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Beneficiary assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.8391785025596619,
+                    "start": 438,
+                    "end": 440
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "beneficiary assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.9741421341896057,
+                    "start": 464,
+                    "end": 466
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "studies",
+                    "confidence": 0.7099129557609558,
+                    "start": 558,
+                    "end": 559
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "WSPs",
+                    "confidence": 0.8602870106697083,
+                    "start": 598,
+                    "end": 599
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "WaSSIP",
+                    "confidence": 0.8741611838340759,
+                    "start": 604,
+                    "end": 605
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "WSPs",
+                    "confidence": 0.9108308553695679,
+                    "start": 598,
+                    "end": 599
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                24
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "to prepare a detailed M&E and reporting system plan, provide on-the-job and other training for\nM&E specialists (at both the implementing agency level and the MWI PCU level), and provide\nother capacity support required to establish and operate an effective M&E system. The project will\nalso finance follow-on training and workshops to enable M&E specialists to ensure that normal\nstaff turnover does not disrupt the M&E effort.\n\n\n**C.** **Sustainability**\n\n\n53. **Sustainability of investments in infrastructure and service delivery depends on**\n**incentives and availability of resources for O&M.** The WSDP will finance infrastructure\ninvestments only if the WSPs, WSBs, or county administrations take the responsibility for\noperating and maintaining the assets. Counties undertaking investment in infrastructure outside\ntheir WSPs will include an O&M plan in the design of infrastructure projects (such as for\ndrainage), before submission to the World Bank for no objection. Similarly, the WSPs and\nCWSB’s bulk water operation will recover the O&M costs of water and sanitation services through\ntariffs imposed on users. Kenya has a well-functioning independent regulator for water supply and\nsewerage, which reviews tariff applications from the WSPs and advises them on their adequacy.\nOne of the Component 3 performance measures designed to encourage the WSPs to improve\noperational efficiency is that their O&M costs are recovered from customers. Component 3 will\nalso support efforts by the WSPs to improve performance in this area. However, recognizing that\ncoverage of the O&M cost for larger investments, right from the beginning, will be a challenge in\nWajir and Garissa Counties, the project will provide operating costs to Wajir and Garissa WSPs\nfor starting the new operations.\n\n\n**D.** **Role of Partners**\n\n\n54. **The AFD will finance the bulk water infrastructure related to Mwache Dam (water**\n**treatment plant (WTP)), pumping stations, reservoirs, and one of the three clean water**\n**transmission mains)** . In addition, the AFD will finance the water supply network rehabilitation\nand extension in Likoni (which is part of Mombasa). The AFD Board approved the project in\nOctober 2016. Under the WSDP, the World Bank will finance the construction and rehabilitation\nof water supply systems in the coastal cities (without Likoni) to improve their efficiency and\neffectiveness in preparation of an increase in bulk water from Mwache Dam.\n\n\nV. **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n**A.** **Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks**\n\n\n55. **The project risk is rated substantial** . This is based on a high rating for institutional\ncapacity for implementation and sustainability; substantial ratings for stakeholders, sector\nstrategies and policies, fiduciary, political and governance, and technical design of project; and\nmoderate ratings for climate, macroeconomic, and environment and social risks.\n\n\n56. **Institutional capacity for implementation and sustainability** - **High risk.** A major risk\nis that the capacity of some of the implementing agencies may not be adequate to implement the\ninvestment projects in accordance with World Bank guidelines and procedures. The WSPs will be\nundertaking much larger infrastructure projects than they have in the past, yet they have no\n\n\n15\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                25
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "experience in implementing a World Bank-financed project. Counties are only starting to\nimplement World Bank-financed projects, and their experience remains very limited. This risk will\nbe mitigated through support to build the capacity of counties (including the ones participating in\nthe WSDP) under the World Bank-financed Kenya Devolution Support Program for Results (the\nproject became effective in September 2016). It will also be mitigated by offering support under\nthe proposed WSDP to build the capacity of the WSPs, the county administrations, and the other\nimplementing agencies, depending on need. This will include mobile teams supporting capacity\nbuilding in procurement, FM, environmental and social safeguards, M&E, and utility reform,\nwhich will be available to all implementing agencies upon request.\n\n\n57. **Stakeholders** - **Substantial risk.** The national and county governments are still working\nout the institutional arrangements for delivery of water and sanitation services in the context of\ndevolution. Although the new Water Act 2016 has aligned the roles of the national government\nand the county governments in the water and sanitation sector, it will take quite some time to align\nall sector institutions and the entire legal framework to the Water Act 2016. The counties have to\ntranslate the Water Act 2016 into their policies and regulations at the county level. The independent\nregulator (WASREB) also has to align its own guidelines to the Water Act 2016. It is important\nthat counties continue to respect the autonomy of their WSPs, allowing them to retain their\nrevenues for provision of services, for O&M, and for investment in new infrastructure. However,\nthe risk of political interference in their operational decisions remains. The project contains several\nmeasures to mitigate the stakeholders’ risk. First, it provides support to several implementing\nagencies in accordance with their constitutional mandates. Therefore, WSPs will receive access to\nresources for investment in distribution networks and counties can obtain resources for investment\nin drainage systems. WSBs will receive resources only for investments in cross-county\ninfrastructure and only with the consent of the relevant county administrations. Second, the WSDP\noffers support to amend policy and legislation to bring them in line with the constitution.\n\n\n58. **Sector strategies and policies** - **Substantial risk.** The design of Component 3 is intended\nto promote (a) improved operational performance of the WSPs and (b) the selection and\nimplementation of investments to increase access to water supply and sanitation services to the\nextent possible given the funding available. The use of performance-based approaches in Kenya is\nnew and the optimal design of such an approach is not known. This risk will be mitigated through\nregular reviews of responses to the incentives offered and quick adjustments in the design if\nwarranted to improve the incentives and achieve the desired results.\n\n\n59. **Fiduciary** - **Substantial risk.** There is potential risk that project funds are not used for the\nintended purposes, are not properly recorded and accounted for, or do not achieve value-formoney. An FM review of the counties and WSPs, undertaken during project preparation, identified\ninadequacies in the FM arrangements, including inadequacies in internal controls around cash\nmanagement, allowances, and other expenditures. In addition, most of the WSPs have ineffective\ninternal audit units. With respect to procurement, key risks include (a) procurement staff at\ncounties and the WSPs having no experience in implementing World Bank-funded projects; (b)\nrecord keeping being inadequate; (c) the qualifications of procurement staff being inadequate; and\n(d) there being a lack of clear procedures and guidelines spelled out in manuals. Therefore, the\noverall unmitigated FM and procurement risks are assessed as substantial. To mitigate the FM\nrisks, the World Bank’s FM team will undertake supervision twice a year. Additional supervision\nactivities will include desk review of quarterly interim financial reports (IFRs) and internal audit\n\n\n16\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                26
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "reports, audited financial statements and management letters, and timely follow-up of issues that\narise. To mitigate the procurement risks, counties and the WSPs will undertake intensive\ncustomized procurement training on World Bank procurement procedures and contract\nmanagement; prepare and monitor implementation of detailed procurement plans with time lines;\nand establish and maintain a record keeping and filing system on contract-by-contract basis.\n\n\n60. **Political and governance**  - **Substantial risk.** The elections scheduled for August 2017\nmay bring into power many new governors and county officials, who may have different ideas of\ncounty priorities and overall project design. This risk will be mitigated by ensuring that PCUs are\nestablished in each implementing agency. In addition, the World Bank will engage the new county\nleadership team shortly after they take office to introduce them to the project objectives and design.\nThe World Bank will continue to maintain an active dialogue throughout the project\nimplementation period.\n\n\n61. **Technical design of project**  - **Substantial risk.** Completion of the Mwache Dam could\nbe delayed and water will not flow until after the WSDP is closed. The Mwache Dam is currently\nscheduled to be operating by 2022; however, delays are common with large infrastructure projects\nin Kenya. If the dam is not completed on time, then some of the benefits expected from the WSDP\nwill be delayed. This risk will be mitigated through the rehabilitation of the Baricho wellfield under\nsubcomponent 1.2 which will produce an additional 17,000 cubic meters per day to bridge the\nsupply gap until Mwache Dam becomes operational and to increase the climate resilience of the\nbulk water system. The designs, bidding documents, and safeguards documents are ready for the\ninvestment in Baricho, and construction can start shortly after effectiveness.\n\n\n62. **Other risks: Climate change**  - **Moderate** . A climate risk screening was carried out at the\nproject concept note stage and the results are in the project file. To mitigate the climate risk, the\nWSDP under subcomponent 1.2 supports operational improvements to the bulk water system so\nthat if one of the five main sources of the system fails, the other sources can partially substitute for\nthe loss of water to the system.\n\n\n63. Although the WSDP contains robust measures to mitigate foreseeable risks, the project will\nbe implemented under conditions of great uncertainty. The risks will be addressed through a close\ndialogue with the MWI and the implementing entities to jointly devise solutions for the issues that\narise.\n\n\nVI. **APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A.** **Economic and Financial Analysis**\n\n\n64. **Component 1 - Financial analysis.** The financial analysis analyzes all cash flows\nassociated with the investment (including capital costs, O&M costs, and revenues) and the\nfinancial sustainability of the participating WSPs. The financial analysis includes a lifetime\nprojection of O&M costs, together with a demonstration of how these will be financed. The\nfinancial analysis consists of (a) assessing the financial performance of WSPs, taking into account\nprevious loans and the planned investment costs under the WSDP and (b) assessing the impact of\nproject investments on O&M and financial viability of the WSP, cost drivers (including different\nloan terms), and future revenue streams and cash flows available to repay the loan. The\n\n\n17\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                27
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "Government of Kenya has decided to pass on the funds under Component 1 at the IDA-SUF terms\nit is receiving from the World Bank. However, 25 percent of the credit will be passed on as a grant\nto ease the financing cost for sanitation investments, which are not income generating, but provide\nimportant public health and environmental benefits.\n\n\n65. For Component 1, the financial analysis includes the coastal WSPs of Mombasa, Malindi,\nKwale, Kilifi, and Tavevo, and the bulk water operation. The financial net present value (NPV)\nand the financial internal rate of return (IRR) are estimated based on the stream of investment and\nO&M costs and operating revenues for a period of 40 years. The discounted rate of annual cash\nflow is 12 percent. The financial IRR is about 12.1 percent and the financial NPV is at about\nUS$1.7 million (see Table 2). The financial projection for the period of the economic life of the\ninvestments shows a stable positive cash flow, and therefore, the investments are financially\njustified.\n\n\n66. **Economic analysis.** The economic analysis demonstrates the economic viability of the\nproject investments. The cost-benefit analysis estimates the economic feasibility of the project by\ncalculating the present value of cost and benefit streams and by determining the NPV and\neconomic rate of return of the project. The net benefit of the project is estimated as the incremental\nbenefit of the ‘with’ and ‘without’ project scenarios. A summary of the economic analysis for the\nwater supply investments is presented in Table 2. The IRR is about 14.9 percent, and the NPV is\nat about US$208.7 million. Detailed results of the economic and financial IRR and NPV for each\nWSP are presented in Tables 2 and 3.\n\n**Table 2: Summary of Cost-benefit Analysis with Project (US$, millions)**\n\n|Col1|Economic Analysis|Financial Analysis|\n|---|---|---|\n|**NPV**|208.7|1.7|\n|**IRR (%)**|14.9|12.1|\n\n\n\n**Table 3: Summary of Cost-benefit Analysis with Project (KSh, millions)**\n\n|Col1|Mombasa|Col3|Malindi|Col5|Kwale|Col7|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|<br>|**Economic**<br>**Analysis**|**Financial**<br>**Analysis**|**Economic**<br>**Analysis**|**Financial**<br>**Analysis**|**Economic**<br>**Analysis**|**Financial**<br>**Analysis**|\n|**NPV**|43.1|19.8|15,614|3,277|3,080|2,602|\n|**IRR (%)**|21.0|16.0|17.3|12.0|21.1|18.5|\n||**Kilifi**|**Kilifi**|**Tavevo**|**Tavevo**|**Bulk Water Operation**|**Bulk Water Operation**|\n|**NPV**|4,375|977|3,304|3,526|238,857|307,580|\n|**IRR (%)**|20.5|13.8|12.5|16.2|10.3|12.7|\n\n\n\n67. **Component 2.** Currently, neither Wajir nor Dadaab are recovering the full cost of water\nand sanitation services from consumers. County subsidies fill the gap. This is mainly due to the\nhigh cost of diesel to run the borehole pumps. In Dadaab, which serves the population through\neight boreholes, about 90 percent of the average monthly revenues is used to pay for diesel. With\nthe remaining 10 percent of the operating revenues, the cost for staff and repair and maintenance\ncannot be covered. In Wajir, the boreholes that rely solely on diesel generators incur higher costs\nthan those which also draw on solar panels for energy. For example, in Khorof Harar, where pumps\n\n\n18\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                28
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "are powered by a mix of generators and solar panels, the water production cost was estimated to\nbe KSh 22 per cubic meter, while at Haandaki which relies on the generators only, the production\ncost is KSh 44 per cubic meter. [11] The WSDP will equip all boreholes in Wajir and Dadaab with\nsolar panels. This is expected to reduce the cost of energy by about 50 percent, helping to make\nthe operation of boreholes financially self-sustaining.\n\n68. A comprehensive economic and financial analysis will be performed for Component 2 as\npart of the ongoing feasibility studies for proposed investments in Wajir and Garissa Counties. The\neconomic and financial analysis will follow the approach outlined above for Component 1.\n\n\n69. **Component 3.** While the specific investments to be supported under Component 3 are not\nknown at this time, financial analyses for potential investments have been carried out. The\nfollowing paragraphs are summaries of analyses for two investments.\n\n\n    - For three possible energy savings investments, the payback periods varied between\n13 and 29 months, making them all financially viable investments. The one with the\nshortest payback period is superior to the others, and will be financed first.\n\n\n    - Ruiru had approached the Kenya Pooled Water Fund (KPWF) seeking funding of\nabout US$8 million for proposed water supply and sanitation investments. KPWF\ndeclined to finance the proposed investment because they would not generate\nadequate returns to repay the loan under KPWF lending terms. The financial model,\nlaid out in Annex 5, shows that the proposed investments would generate adequate\nreturns if they were financed with a mix of KPWF and WSDP funds, which come with\nmore favorable lending terms. However, it must be noted that this is only an example\nto show the potential of mixing WSDP and KPWF funds.\n\n\n**B.** **Technical**\n\n\n70. The project will finance rehabilitation and construction of water distribution and sanitation\nsystems, involving, among others, the rehabilitation and construction of wastewater treatment\nplants, sewerage systems, and septic sludge treatment facilities in urban areas; extension of parts\nof the bulk water system that serves more than one county and the operation of the system. It will\nalso finance development of new water sources and rehabilitation of existing sources,\nrehabilitation and construction of distribution systems, and construction of new sanitation facilities\nin Wajir town and in the communities near the Dadaab refugee camp in Garissa County. The\nproject will provide TA for strengthening the various implementing agencies to enable them to\nfulfill their responsibilities. It will also finance the start-up costs for the Garissa WSP to establish\nand begin operations of a regional office in Dadaab. All designs will follow Kenyan design\nstandards which are consistent with appropriate international standards. The construction and\nrehabilitation of water supply and sanitation systems together with TA and capacity-building\nsupport is appropriate, as the objective is to reduce NRW, increase water supplies to consumers,\nand improve environmental sanitation. The expansion of the water supply and sanitation systems\nwill lead to increased access to services and higher revenues to sustain the services.\n\n\n11 On average, most of the water points rely on generators only for production.\n\n\n19\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                29
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "71. The proposed investments at the coast are based on masterplans defining the priority\ninvestments, feasibility studies, and detailed designs. The investments in the northeastern counties\nwill be informed by a detailed study of the potential water sources in the area and benefits and\ncosts of various options. This approach has proven to be effective in Kenya and in other countries\nat similar levels to Kenya’s institutional and economic development. The designs of the water\nsupply and wastewater systems supported under the project will be similar to those already being\nimplemented in Kenya by the WSBs, the WSPs, and the Government in urban centers. Moreover,\nthe project’s design conforms to international standards by systemically strengthening institutions\nat both the central and local levels of government and in the water and sanitation sector. It also\nconforms to international standards by combining institutional reforms and capacity building with\nfinance for investment.\n\n\n**C.** **Financial Management**\n\n\n72. The World Bank’s FM team conducted an FM assessment of all the identified\nimplementing entities, including Mombasa, Kwale, Taita Taveta, Kilifi, Wajir, and Garissa\nCounties and their WSPs, CWSB, WASREB, and the MWI. The objective of the FM assessment\nwas to determine whether the implementing entities financial arrangements (a) are capable of\ncorrectly and completely recording all transactions and balances relating to the project; (b)\nfacilitate the preparation of regular, accurate, reliable, and timely financial statements; (c)\nsafeguard the project’s entity assets; and (d) are subject to auditing arrangements acceptable to the\nWorld Bank. The assessment complied with the Financial Management Manual for World BankFinanced Investment Operations that became effective on March 1, 2010 (retrofitted on February\n4, 2015). The assessment covered the six FM elements of budgeting, funds flows, accounting,\ninternal controls, financial reporting, and auditing. The overall residual FM risk is, therefore,\nassessed as substantial mainly because of the complexity of the project and capacity challenges of\nsome of the WSPs that will be implementing the project. Details of the assessment are included in\nAnnex 3.\n\n\n73. The MWI is assessed as having adequate FM capacity and has no outstanding audit reports\nwith the World Bank project (KWSCRP) which it is currently implementing. The audit report for\nthe financial year ending on June 30, 2016, was qualified for the KWSCRP. The MWI is\naddressing the qualification issues. WASREB and the CWSB have been assessed as having\nadequate FM capacity. The CWSB is already implementing the World Bank-financed WaSSIP.\n\n\n74. The FM review of the counties and WSPs identified inadequacies in the FM arrangements,\nincluding qualified audit reports and inadequate staff capacity. It is expected that the World Bankfinanced Kenya Devolution Support Project (P149129) will provide support to address the\ninadequacies. At the county level, the department of water will implement activities under the\nguidance of the county executive committee member for water. The county governments are legal\nentities and accounting units and will be accountable for the funds and compliance. The county\ntreasury will be responsible for the FM arrangements at the county level, including disbursement\nof funds to the WSPs (as appropriate), monitoring use of funds, and accounting for disbursed funds.\n\n\n75. The project will adopt the statements of expenditure method of disbursement. Two\nDesignated Accounts (DAs) in Euros will be opened by the NT at the Central Bank of Kenya\n\n\n20\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "masterplans",
+                    "confidence": 0.7538902759552002,
+                    "start": 11,
+                    "end": 12
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "northeastern counties",
+                    "confidence": 0.552311897277832,
+                    "start": 28,
+                    "end": 30
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "FM assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.975182294845581,
+                    "start": 188,
+                    "end": 190
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "World Bank’s FM team",
+                    "confidence": 0.7943337559700012,
+                    "start": 180,
+                    "end": 186
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.5966872572898865,
+                    "start": 329,
+                    "end": 330
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "implementing entities",
+                    "confidence": 0.8163071870803833,
+                    "start": 194,
+                    "end": 196
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Financial Management Manual",
+                    "confidence": 0.6276182532310486,
+                    "start": 307,
+                    "end": 310
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.7384986877441406,
+                    "start": 329,
+                    "end": 330
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audit report",
+                    "confidence": 0.7801390886306763,
+                    "start": 433,
+                    "end": 435
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.7119491100311279,
+                    "start": 444,
+                    "end": 445
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "statements of expenditure",
+                    "confidence": 0.8722377419471741,
+                    "start": 619,
+                    "end": 622
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "method of disbursement",
+                    "confidence": 0.7874453663825989,
+                    "start": 622,
+                    "end": 625
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.7532965540885925,
+                    "start": 516,
+                    "end": 517
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                30
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "(CBK): one for county activities (DA-A) and the other for all other activities (DA-B) at the national\nlevel (for MWI, WASREB, and WSB) activities.\n\n\n    - For the county-level activities, funds will be disbursed to the counties, upon request\nby the MWI, [12] from the DAs to a segregated county special purpose account at the\nCBK through the exchequer account and county revenue fund. [13] From the county\nspecial purpose account, the funds will be disbursed to existing project accounts for\nthe WSPs to cover expenditures for water supply and sanitation. Expenditures for\nstormwater management or for any other activities that counties implement directly\n(not through the WSPs) will be covered by the county from the county special purpose\naccount. The counties will have the option of opening accounts for expenditures at the\ncounty level or incur expenditures directly from the special purpose account.\n\n\n    - For national-level activities, funds will be disbursed from the DA-B to a project\naccount in Kenya shillings which will be opened by the MWI at the CBK from which\npayment will be made for the MWI activities. For WASREB and WSB activities,\nfunds will be disbursed from the DA-B to a project account in Kenya shillings which\nwill be opened by WASREB or the respective WSB at a commercial bank acceptable\nto IDA from which payment will be made. The DAs will be replenished on the basis\nof a withdrawal application (WA) submitted to the World Bank by the MWI through\nthe NT.\n\n\n76. Three key issues need to be fast tracked:\n\n\n    - The WSDP allocations to counties should be factored in the County Revenue\nAllocation Act to facilitate the transfer of allocation made to counties from a\nconsolidated account to a county revenue fund.\n\n\n    - A project implementation manual (PIM) has been prepared and approved by the\nWorld Bank which includes an FM manual. The PIM is a living document that will\nbe updated from time to time as the project evolves.\n\n\n    - An FM specialist should be deployed to the MWI PCU according to the terms of\nreference prepared by the MWI and cleared with the World Bank.\n\n\n**D.** **Procurement**\n\n\n77. A procurement capacity assessment of the proposed project implementing agencies was\ncarried out. The agencies being assessed include counties and their WSPs. The assessment\nreviewed the organizational structure for implementing the project, functions, staff skills and\nexperiences, adequacy for implementing the project, and the interaction between the project’s staff\nresponsible for the procurement and the relevant government agencies. Based on the assessment\n\n\n12 This is agreed mechanism between the national government and counties for donor funds.\n13 Each county will have one county special purpose account. The chief officer for water and the chief officer for\nfinance will be co-signatories for the account. The county special purpose account will avoid co-mingling of project\nfunds in the county operating accounts and minimize risk of project funds being used on non-project activities at the\ncounty level.\n\n\n21\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                31
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "undertaken, it is noted that the agencies have established functioning procurement units and the\ncapacity of these units varies from one county/WSP to another. However, there is a need for\nstrengthening and capacity building. Procurement in the counties is faced with some challenges\nidentified during the World Bank’s capacity assessment and appropriate mitigation measures to\naddress these inadequacies are included in the project design.\n\n\n78. Based on the assessment, the overall unmitigated risk for procurement is Substantial.\nProposed risk mitigation measures include (a) providing intensive customized procurement\ntraining to relevant staff in counties and water companies on World Bank procurement procedures\nand contract management; (b) preparing a realistic procurement plan which could include detailed\nactivity time lines tied to disbursement and status of implementation/delivery particularly for\nmonitoring purposes; and (c) establishing and maintaining a record keeping and filing system on\ncontract-by-contract basis. A detailed procurement assessment and the mitigation measures are\nincluded in Annex 3.\n\n\n79. Procurement under the WSDP will be carried out in accordance with the World Bank’s\n‘Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and\nIDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Borrowers’ dated January 2011, revised July 2014, and\n‘Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and\nGrants by World Bank Borrowers’ dated January 2011, revised July 2014, and the provisions\nstipulated in the Financing Agreements. In addition, the project will carry out implementation in\naccordance with the ‘Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects\nFinanced by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants’ (the Anticorruption Guidelines) dated\nOctober 15, 2006 and revised in January 2011 and July 1, 2016 and the provisions stipulated in\nthe Financing Agreements.\n\n\n**E.** **Environment and Social (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n80. **The project is assigned an Environmental Category B, on the assumption that**\n**subprojects may result in potential adverse environmental and social impacts that are**\n**reversible, temporary in nature and scope, and can be easily and cost-effectively mitigated** .\nIt is also assumed that impacts may be site-specific and may not affect an area broader than the\nsites or facilities of the physical works. The project triggers safeguards policies on Environmental\nAssessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04), Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP\n4.11), Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12), Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37), International\nWaterways (OP/BP 7.50), and Indigenous Peoples (known as vulnerable and marginalized groups\n(VMGs) in Kenya) (OP/BP 4.10). The potential subprojects include rehabilitation, expansion, and\ndevelopment of water supply systems, rehabilitation of a wastewater treatment plant, and\nconstruction of sanitation and sewerage infrastructure.\n\n\n81. **As most of the locations/sites of the subprojects have not yet been identified, the client**\n**has focused on preparing framework documents in a consultative manner** . These include (a)\nan Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) to ensure that a process of\nidentifying, assessing, and mitigating environmental and social impacts is integrated in the\ndevelopment of the specific subprojects; (b) a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) to clarify the\nprinciples and legal and institutional procedures for resettlement and rehabilitation to be applied\nto investments; and (c) Social Assessments (SAs), specifically for Wajir and Garissa counties, to\n\n\n22\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                32
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "ensure that the project interventions benefit as well as avoid any potential adverse effects on\nVMGs. The majority of project beneficiaries in Wajir and Garissa Counties are ethnic Somalis\nwho qualify as VMGs, and therefore, the criteria for OP 4.10 is met. According to the requirements\nof the policy, when indigenous peoples are the sole or the overwhelming majority of direct project\nbeneficiaries it is not required to prepare an Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP). However, SAs need to\nbe prepared, consulted upon, and disclosed. The elements of an IPP should be included in the\noverall project design. The ESMF, RPF, and SAs have been prepared in accordance with the World\nBank’s Operational Policy on Safeguards and the requirements of the Kenya National\nEnvironment Management Authority and National Land Commission. These documents have been\nconsulted upon, approved by the World Bank and disclosed in February 2017 in-country and on\nthe World Bank’s external website. The recommendations of the SAs are summarized in Annex 3\nand they will inform the technical studies and designs being conducted by the client.\n\n\n82. **Four subprojects have been identified for immediate urgent works.** These are (a)\nrehabilitation and expansion of the Mombasa Lot 2B pipelines; (b) Kipevu wastewater treatment\nplant immediate works and extension; (c) improving the existing stormwater outlets, outfalls, and\ncombined sewer overflows in Mombasa Island; and (d) additional rehabilitation of the Baricho\nwell field. The client has developed detailed designs for these subprojects and their sites/locations\nhave been identified. Therefore, the client prepared site-specific safeguards instruments, which\nhave been consulted upon and approved by the World Bank. Once the additional subprojects and\ntheir locations/sites are identified for financing under the WSDP, the client will prepare additional,\nsupplementary site-specific safeguard instruments, including an Environmental and Social Impact\nAssessment (ESIA), Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and Resettlement\nAction Plans (RAPs) or abbreviated RAPs, which will be consulted upon, cleared by the World\nBank, and then disclosed in-county and on the World Bank’s external website before\ncommencement of any civil works.\n\n\n83. **The capacity to manage safeguards issues will be built at all the agencies that will be**\n**implementing the project** . The project will be implemented at the county level through WSBs\nand WSPs who have been overseeing and implementing various donor-supported projects. A rapid\nassessment of the capacity of entities, such as the MWI, selected WSBs and WSPs, revealed\nacceptable and satisfactory levels of technical know-how within these entities for planning, design,\nand implementation of water and sanitation investments. Also, capacity to process and oversee the\npreparation of safeguard reports at the MWI, WSBs, and most of the WSPs has been found to be\ngood, albeit needing enhancement, particularly in ensuring implementation of safeguard\ninstruments and compliance with relevant national regulations and requirements such as the\nEnvironmental and Management Coordination Act (Number 8 of 1999, as amended in 2015). The\ncapacity challenges arise from limited filled positions for environmental and social safeguard\nexperts at the implementing agencies and the limited experience of those already in positions to\nsatisfactorily identify risks and implement remediation measures. Under the WSDP, the client has\ncommitted to appoint or hire experienced environmental and social safeguard officers to support\nimplementation of the safeguard instruments and monitor and enforce compliance. In addition, the\nWSPs will appoint or recruit safeguard experts at the county level to support implementation of\nthe project. The project will prepare a safeguard capacity-building plan to train and expose old and\nnew safeguard officers on various aspects of environmental and social sustainability, including\nnational regulations and requirements, World Bank Operational Policies on Safeguards,\npreparation, implementation of safeguard instruments, and compliance monitoring and reporting.\n\n\n23\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                33
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "This plan will be financed through the project. The World Bank will complement client internal\ncapacity-building/strengthening efforts through the implementation support missions and other\nmonitoring visits that will be carried out in collaboration with the client on a regular basis.\n\n\n**F.** **Citizen Engagement**\n\n\n84. The WSDP will build on the experience gained during implementation of WaSSIP in\npromoting accountability to citizens in the water and sanitation sector and formulating mechanisms\nfor citizen feedback. [14] It will also build on the WaSSIP training provided to staff of the WSPs and\nWSBs on gender equality, which generated gender policies and action plans in sector institutions. [15]\nThe following actions are proposed under the project with respect to citizen engagement and\ngender inclusion:\n\n\n    - A gender disaggregated analysis and consultations on water and sanitation issues will\nbe undertaken in the targeted counties in the underserved northeastern region as part\nof understanding how the project can best provide access to improved services. The\nanalysis will identify actions to address the issues faced by men and women in\naccessing water and sanitation services, with particular attention to gaps between men\nand women in decision making. The design of sanitation facilities to be supported\nunder the project in Wajir and Garissa will be informed by the findings of the analysis\nand consultations.\n\n\n    - The project will support the WSPs to prepare and implement gender action plans.\n\n\n    - The project will review the capacity of the counties in the coastal regions and their\nWSPs to efficiently handle complaints. This will be done against the framework of\nthe requirements for ‘MajiVoice’ the system piloted under WASSIP, which has shown\nits potential to enable oversight on complaint handling by the utility management.\n\n\n**G.** **Climate Mitigation and Adaption Co-benefits**\n\n\n85. While a full climate mitigation and adaption co-benefits assessment, including greenhouse\ngases, can only be carried out during project implementation when the vast majority of investments\nhave been designed, a qualitative assessment of the climate mitigation and adaption co-benefits\nshows that the project will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and, therefore,\nreduce the risk of climate change. The project will also lower the current and future risks and\nvulnerabilities posed by climate change. The details are presented in Annex 3.\n\n\n14 See a short video clip on MajiVoice on Nairobi Water Company’s YouTube channel\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmGkcte7TWE. See publication on MajiVoice:\nhttps://wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-MajiVoice-New-Accountability-Tool-to-Improve-PublicServices.pdf.\n15 http://imagebank.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2011/11/07/000333038_20111107011654/\nRendered/PDF/652790BRI0IFC00Lesson0Truly0Teaming.pdf.\n\n\n24\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                34
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**H.** **World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n86. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a World Bank\n(WB) supported project may submit complaints to existing project-level grievance redress\nmechanisms or the WB’s Grievance Redress Service (GRS). The GRS ensures that complaints\nreceived are promptly reviewed in order to address project-related concerns. Project affected\ncommunities and individuals may submit their complaint to the WB’s independent Inspection\nPanel which determines whether harm occurred, or could occur, as a result of WB non-compliance\nwith its policies and procedures. Complaints may be submitted at any time after concerns have\nbeen brought directly to the World Bank's attention, and Bank Management has been given an\nopportunity to respond. For information on how to submit complaints to the World Bank’s\ncorporate Grievance Redress Service (GRS), please visit http://www.worldbank.org/GRS. For\ninformation on how to submit complaints to the World Bank Inspection Panel, please visit\nwww.inspectionpanel.org.\n\n\n25\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "World Bank Grievance Redress",
+                    "confidence": 0.7472513318061829,
+                    "start": 8,
+                    "end": 12
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "Project affected\ncommunities and individuals",
+                    "confidence": 0.600773274898529,
+                    "start": 72,
+                    "end": 77
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                35
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring**\n\n\n**Kenya: Water and Sanitation Development Project (P156634)**\n\n**Results Framework**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Project Development Objective: To improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal and northeastern regions in Kenya.|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|Col12|Col13|Col14|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Fre-**<br>**quency**|**Data**<br>**source/**<br>**method**<br>**-ology**|**Respon**<br>**-sibility**<br>**for data**<br>**collec-**<br>**tion**|**Comments**|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Baselin**<br>**e in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n|People in urban<br>areas provided<br>with access to<br>improved water<br>sources under the<br>project.|X|Number|0|0|2,500|18,400|50,900|70,000|90,000|Semi-<br>ann-<br>ually|Project<br>reports<br>on<br>construct<br>ion and<br>operatio<br>n of<br>infrastru<br>cture.<br>WSP<br>data on<br>connec-<br>tions.|WSPs|Coast counties,<br>Wajir and<br>Garissa. One<br>household<br>connection<br>serves 5 people,<br>one community<br>water point<br>serves 30<br>people, and one<br>kiosk serves<br>400 people.|\n|People provided<br>with access to<br>improved<br>sanitation<br>services under the<br>project—urban.|X|Number|<br>0|0|0|10,000|30,000|40,000|50,000|Semi-<br>ann-<br>ually|Project<br>reports<br>on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operatio<br>n of<br>infra-<br>structure<br>. WSP<br>data on<br>connec-<br>tions.|WSPs|Primarily,<br>Wajir and<br>Garissa.|\n\n\n26\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                36
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Project Development Objective: To improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal and northeastern regions in Kenya.|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|Col12|Col13|Col14|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Fre-**<br>**quency**|**Data**<br>**source/**<br>**method**<br>**-ology**|**Respon**<br>**-sibility**<br>**for data**<br>**collec-**<br>**tion**|**Comments**|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Baselin**<br>**e in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n|People benefiting<br>under the project<br>from a connection<br>to the sewage<br>system or from<br>improved septic<br>sludge<br>management.||Number|<br>0|0|0|0|240,000|330,000|415,000|Semi-<br>ann-<br>ually|Project<br>reports<br>on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operatio<br>n of<br>infrastru<br>cture.<br>WSP<br>data on<br>connec-<br>tions.|WSPs|Coast counties<br>and Wajir.<br>People<br>benefiting from<br>improved septic<br>sludge<br>management<br>are those whose<br>sludge is taken<br>to a sludge <br>treatment<br>facility. The<br>number of<br>people<br>benefiting from<br>septic sludge<br>management<br>will be<br>calculated as:<br>total dry solids<br>divided by per<br>capita<br>production =<br>number of<br>people.|\n|People with<br>existing<br>connections<br>benefiting from<br>more hours per<br>week of water<br>services.||Number|0|0|0|0|1.900,00<br>0|2,030,0<br>00|2,100,00|Semi-<br>ann-<br>ually|Project<br>reports<br>on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operatio<br>n of<br>infrastru<br>cture.<br>WSP<br>data on|WSPs|Coast counties<br>residents to<br>benefit from<br>rehabilitation of<br>the distribution<br>network.|\n\n\n27\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                37
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Project Development Objective: To improve water supply and sanitation services in select coastal and northeastern regions in Kenya.|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Col11|Col12|Col13|Col14|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Cumulative Target Values**|**Fre-**<br>**quency**|**Data**<br>**source/**<br>**method**<br>**-ology**|**Respon**<br>**-sibility**<br>**for data**<br>**collec-**<br>**tion**|**Comments**|\n|**_PDO Level_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Baselin**<br>**e in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n||||||||||||connec-<br>tions.|||\n|Direct project<br>beneficiaries|X|Number|<br>0|0|2,500|24,700|2,022,00<br>0|2,100,00<br>0|2,200,0<br>00|Semi-<br>ann-<br>ually|Calcu-<br>lated<br>based on<br>the<br>people<br>bene-<br>fitting<br>from<br>various<br>intervent<br>ions.|MWI to<br>compile<br>data<br>from<br>WSPs,<br>and<br>counties||\n|of which female<br>(beneficiaries)|X|Percen<br>tage|0|0|50%|50%|50%|50%|50%|Semi-<br>annuall<br>y||||\n\n\n28\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                38
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Intermediate<br>Results<br>Indicators|C<br>o<br>r<br>e|Unit<br>of<br>Meas<br>ure|Cumulative Target Values|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Fre-<br>quency|Data<br>source/<br>method-<br>ology|Respon-<br>sibility<br>for data<br>collec-<br>tion|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_Intermediate_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Base-**<br>**line in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation services in the coastal region**|\n|Piped household<br>water connections<br>that are benefiting<br>from<br>rehabilitation<br>works undertaken<br>under the project.||Number|<br>0|0|0|15,000<br>|26,000<br>|40,0000<br>|60,000<br>|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operation<br>of<br>infrastruc-<br>ture. WSP<br>data on<br>connec-<br>tions.|WSPs|Coastal WSPs<br>by service<br>area.|\n|New piped<br>household water<br>connections<br>under the project.||Number|0|0|500<br>|3,500<br>|10,000<br>|12,000<br>|13,000<br>|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data<br>on connec-<br>tions.|WSPs||\n|Water delivered<br>by WSPs to<br>customers (as<br>reflected in water<br>bills).|<br> <br> <br>|Million<br>cubic<br>meters<br>per day|39.3<br>|46.2|46.2<br>|51.6<br>|51.6<br>|51.6<br>|51.6<br>|Semi-<br>annually|WSP<br>opera-<br>tional data|WSPs|Source<br>development<br>Baricho and<br>NRW.|\n|People provided<br>with access to<br>improved shared<br>sanitation<br>facilities under<br>the project.16||Number|0|0|0|7,200|7,200|7,200|7,200|Semi-<br>annually|WSP and<br>county data|WSPs and<br>counties|All coastal<br>towns will<br>receive at<br>least one<br>ablution<br>block|\n|Quantity of septic<br>sludge treated in<br>facilities<br>supported under<br>the project.|<br> <br> <br>|Tons per<br>year<br>(dry<br>solids)|<br>0|0|1,000|13,000|13,500|14,000|14,500<br>|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>constructio<br>n and<br>operation<br>of<br>infrastruct<br>ure. WSP|WSPs|0.04 cubic<br>meters per<br>day per<br>person per<br>year|\n\n\n\n16 WSDP is financing 48 ablution blocks, with an average of eight toilets per block. Each ablution block will serve an estimated 150 people.\n\n\n29\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                39
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Intermediate<br>Results<br>Indicators|C<br>o<br>r<br>e|Unit<br>of<br>Meas<br>ure|Cumulative Target Values|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Fre-<br>quency|Data<br>source/<br>method-<br>ology|Respon-<br>sibility<br>for data<br>collec-<br>tion|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_Intermediate_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Base-**<br>**line in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n||||||||||||data on<br>services.|||\n|Volume of<br>biological oxygen<br>demand pollution<br>loads removed by<br>treatment plants<br>supported under<br>the project.||Tons<br>per<br>year|0|0|600<br>|900<br>|1,400<br>|2,100<br>|3,100<br>|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operation<br>of<br>infrastruct<br>ure. WSP<br>data on<br>operations|WSPs|Kipevu<br>wastewater<br>treatment<br>plant|\n|Hours of service<br>per week provided<br>by coastal WSPs<br>benefiting from<br>the project.||Hour<br>s|15|15|15|16|16|16|16|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data<br>on<br>operations|WSPs||\n|Non-revenue<br>water (% of water<br>that a service<br>provider supplies<br>to its distribution<br>system that is not<br>reflected in<br>revenues).||Perce<br>ntage|50|45|40|35|35|35|35|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data<br>on<br>operations|WSPs||\n|Operations and<br>maintenance<br>costs of coastal<br>WSPs benefiting<br>from the project<br>recovered from<br>customers.||Perce<br>ntage|100|100|110|110|110|120|120|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data<br>on<br>operations|WSPs||\n|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved northeastern counties**|\n\n\n30\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                40
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Intermediate<br>Results<br>Indicators|C<br>o<br>r<br>e|Unit<br>of<br>Meas<br>ure|Cumulative Target Values|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Fre-<br>quency|Data<br>source/<br>method-<br>ology|Respon-<br>sibility<br>for data<br>collec-<br>tion|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_Intermediate_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Base-**<br>**line in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n|New piped<br>household water<br>connections that<br>are resulting from<br>the project<br>intervention.||Number|0|0|0|90|90|1,000|2,500|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion. WSP<br>data on<br>connec-<br>tions|WSPs|The targets<br>here are<br>highly<br>uncertain and<br>will be<br>revised<br>during the<br>midterm<br>review. The<br>target is for<br>Wajir town<br>only.|\n|Improved<br>community water<br>points<br>constructed or<br>rehabilitated<br>under the project.||Number|0|0|12|12|12|12|12|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion.|WSPs||\n|New water<br>supplied to<br>northeastern<br>WSPs under the<br>project (m3/day).||Number|0|0|0|0|0|3,000|3,000|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion.|WSPs|Wajir and<br>Garissa. To<br>be revised at<br>midterm<br>review.|\n|Quantity of septic<br>sludge treated in<br>facilities<br>supported under<br>the project.|<br>|Tons per<br>year|<br>0|0|0|0|2,000|2,100|2,200|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operation<br>of<br>infrastruct<br>ure. WSP<br>data on<br>services.|WSPs|Garissa and<br>Wajir<br>calculated as<br>0.04 cubic<br>meter per<br>person per<br>year x<br>population<br>served.|\n|Volume of<br>biological oxygen<br>demand pollution<br>loads removed by<br>treatment plants|<br> <br> <br>|Tons per<br>year<br>(dry<br>solids)|<br>0|0|0|0|0|1,100|1,200|Semi-<br>annually|Project<br>reports on<br>construc-<br>tion and<br>operation|WSPs|Will be<br>calculated<br>once the<br>investment|\n\n\n31\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                41
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Intermediate<br>Results<br>Indicators|C<br>o<br>r<br>e|Unit<br>of<br>Meas<br>ure|Cumulative Target Values|Col5|Col6|Col7|Col8|Col9|Col10|Fre-<br>quency|Data<br>source/<br>method-<br>ology|Respon-<br>sibility<br>for data<br>collec-<br>tion|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**_Intermediate_**<br>**_Results_**<br>**_Indicators_**|**C**<br>**o**<br>**r**<br>**e**|**Unit**<br>**of**<br>**Meas**<br>**ure**|**Base-**<br>**line in**<br>**2016**|**2017**|**2018**|**2019**|**2020**|**2021**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|**2022**|\n|supported under<br>the project.|||||||||||of<br>infrastruc-<br>ture.  WSP<br>data on<br>operations||plans are<br>known.|\n|Gender action<br>plans developed<br>and under<br>implementation.||Number|0|0|0|1|2|3|3|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data|WSPs||\n|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**|\n|Guidelines for<br>results-based<br>financing<br>adopted.||Yes/No|No|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Semi-<br>annually|WASREB<br>reports|WASREB||\n|Results-based<br>financing<br>mechanism<br>established and<br>operational.||Yes/No|No|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Yes|Semi-<br>annually|WASREB<br>reports|WASREB|Operational<br>means<br>disburse-<br>ments to<br>utilities are<br>being made.|\n|Complaints<br>handling system<br>(MajiVoice)<br>operational in<br>WSPs supported<br>under the project.||Number|0|0|0|1|1|2|2|Semi-<br>annually|WSP data|WSPs|MOWASCO<br>and one<br>other.|\n\n\n\n_Notes:_\na. The WSDP is financing 48 ablution blocks, with an average of eight toilets per block. Each ablution block will serve an estimated 150 people.\nb. Indicators and targets for access and operational and financial performance for activities to be supported under Component 3 will be introduced during\nimplementation of the project, once it becomes clear what investments and WSPs will be supported.\n\n\n32\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                42
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 2: Detailed Project Description**\n\n\n**KENYA: Water and Sanitation Development Project**\n\n**A.** **Project Components**\n\n\n1. The proposed WSDP will comprise four components, as presented in the following\nparagraphs.\n\n\n2. **Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban water supply and sanitation**\n**services in the coastal region (US$176 million** _equivalent_ **, of which IDA-SUF US$160 million**\n_equivalent_ **)**\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1.1: Support to coastal counties (US$132 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF_\n_US$120 million equivalent)_\n\n\n3. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to improve water supply\nand sanitation services in urban areas, including (a) construction and rehabilitation of water supply,\nsanitation, and stormwater infrastructure investments including construction or rehabilitation of\noffices for WSPs; and (b) capacity-building and institutional strengthening activities, including\ncustomer identification surveys, improving billing and collection systems, and NRW reduction, to\nsupport improved water and sanitation performance of the participating counties and their WSPs.\n\n\n4. **This subcomponent will support counties and their WSPs that are connected to the**\n**bulk water system for the construction and rehabilitation of water distribution and**\n**sanitation systems in urban areas** . This will ensure that they can distribute the additional amount\nof water that the World Bank-financed Mwache Dam (the project is ongoing and the dam is at\nfinal design stage) will provide. Although the dam will only directly supply water to Mombasa\nand Kwale Counties, the other areas connected to the bulk water system will also receive additional\nwater once Mwache Dam becomes operational and starts supplying water to Mombasa, because\nthat will free up other bulk water sources currently used by Mombasa. In total about 800 kilometers\nof pipes will be rehabilitated, about 400 kilometers of pipes for extension will be laid. This will\ninclude Mombasa County with almost 500 kilometers of rehabilitation, 174 kilometers of\nextension; Kilifi County with 140 kilometers of rehabilitation, 174 kilometers of extension; Taita\nTaveta County with 35 kilometers of rehabilitation, 52 kilometers of extension; and Kwale County\nwith 35 kilometers of rehabilitation, 43 kilometers of extension.\n\n\n5. **In addition, this subcomponent will finance investments in sanitation infrastructure**\n**so that the additional water supplied will not increase the contamination of coastal waters,**\n**the cleanliness of which is vital for the tourism industry** . These investments will include\nrehabilitation and construction of wastewater treatment plants, sewerage systems, and septic\nsludge treatment facilities, as well as limited investments in stormwater systems.\n\n\n6. **This subcomponent will also finance institutional strengthening and capacity-**\n**building activities for county governments and their WSPs.** Many counties need to align their\nwater and sanitation regulations with their new responsibilities and need to strengthen their\ncapacity for enforcement of the regulations. The WSDP will support these activities. Counties also\nneed to embark on IUWM activities to improve the sustainability and climate resilience of services.\n\n\n33\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                43
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "Therefore, the WSDP will finance studies and TA in areas such as energy audits, wastewater reuse,\nwater meter maintenance, remote water meter reading, leak detection, water wastage reduction,\npre-paid water supply, and the like. The TA to the WSPs will focus on measures to reduce NRW\nand to minimize any increase in NRW which might occur once the water flows from Mwache\nDam, which will increase the pressure in the networks (see paragraph 8). Another focus of the TA\nwill be to improve on-site and off-site sanitation services. A challenge has been insufficient\nrevenue generation and insufficient budgeting for sanitation services, which has led to existing\nwastewater treatment plants, such as the one in Kipevu (Mombasa), not being fully operational.\nBefore financing construction of additional wastewater treatment plants, the existing ones should\nbe made fully functional with sufficient revenue to ensure their sustainable operations. The TA\nwill help the WSPs establish separate cost accounting for water supply and sanitation (including\nseptic sludge collection and treatment), revise tariffs to cover the true cost of sanitation services,\nand establish a separate budget for sustainable operation of sanitation services.\n\n\n7. **Strategy for reduction of NRW in the coastal towns** . The reduction of NRW is focusing\non two situations: (a) reducing NRW to an acceptable level before Mwache Dam becomes\noperational to mitigate the current severe shortfall of water supply; and (b) maintaining NRW at\nan acceptable level when Mwache Dam becomes operational. Once the water from Mwache Dam\nbecomes available, all coastal towns on the bulk water system will have more water. This will lead\nto increased pressure and longer service hours, both of which contribute to an increase in physical\nwater losses. Active leakage control is needed to ensure that the additional water reaches the\ncustomers.\n\n\n8. **Zoning/district metered areas (DMA) approach to NRW reduction.** The typical\napproach of establishing and improving DMAs sequentially and keeping the ones established\nunder pressure 24/7 will be followed as much as possible to avoid intermittent supply in these\nareas. Intermittent supply harms the network through water hammers that lead to substantial\nincreases in NRW. Once the water from Mwache Dam becomes available, all network areas will\nbe pressurized 24/7. Under the WSDP, zones and DMAs will be established in all network areas.\nThis, together with the NRW reduction measures outlined below will reduce NRW and, therefore,\nmitigate the shortfall until Mwache Dam is operational. These measures will also strengthen the\ncapacity in the WSPs and provide them with the tools to effectively address issues with NRW that\nmight arise once Mwache Dam is operational.\n\n\n9. **NRW reduction in Mombasa.** MOWASCO already receives support through a\npartnership arrangement with a large water utility from the Netherlands and also receives support\nfor a utility turnaround program for about US$4 million under the KWSCRP. Both include\nactivities to reduce the current levels of NRW. One of the important measures already completed\nwas to pilot DMAs which led to significant reduction of NRW in these areas. Under the KWSCRP\nUS$20 million is allocated to extend this approach to other areas. The WSDP will provide\nadditional funds to establish DMAs for the entire network of Mombasa and assist the WSP in\nmaintaining these DMAs.\n\n\n10. **Under the ongoing WaSSIP, consultancies are ongoing to assist the other WSPs**\n**connected to the bulk water system to reduce NRW** . These will do the following:\n\n\n    - Establish water supply zoning at the sector and DMA levels\n\n\n34\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                44
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "    - Establish a baseline for NRW data for zones and a water audit system\n\n\n    - Develop a customer metering program\n\n\n    - Create a database for all the WSP networks\n\n\n    - Carry out a component analysis and calibrate a network analysis for NRW reduction\nand control\n\n\n    - Prepare for use of water balance software (to be procured under WSDP)\n\n\n    - Prepare performance-based NRW reduction and management contracts for the\nselected WSPs (to be procured under the WSDP)\n\n\n    - Assist in capacity building of the leak detection and repair teams\n\n\n    - Prepare designs for network rehabilitation and extension which will include\ninvestments in pressure management and for universal metering\n\n\n_Subcomponent 1.2: Support to the coast bulk water services provider (US$44 million equivalent,_\n_of which IDA-SUF US$40 million equivalent)_\n\n\n11. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to improve the\ninterconnected coast bulk water system, including (a) construction and rehabilitation of water\nmains and boreholes; (b) TA to the CWSB, including financing a management or service contract\nfor the operation of the coast water bulk system; and (c) partial financing of ongoing construction\ncontracts of water transmission mains from Kakuyuni to Kilifi and from Kakuyuni to Gongoni for\nthe Baricho wellfield.\n\n\n12. **This subcomponent will support CWSB in the rehabilitation and extension of parts**\n**of the bulk water system that serves more than one county and the operation of the system** .\nBased on the Water Act 2016, the national government (through the Coast WSB and in the future\nthrough its legal successor, the Water Services Development Agency) will remain in charge of\nbuilding inter-county bulk water infrastructure. The counties of Mombasa, Kilifi, Kwale, and Taita\nTaveta get their water supply mainly from the interconnected bulk water system that extends across\ncounties. The bulk water provider is responsible for selling water in bulk to the WSPs and for the\nO&M of the bulk infrastructure. The subcomponent will finance investments in bulk water\ninfrastructure which will include Mwache Dam downstream bulk water infrastructure, such as two\ntransmission mains. Additional bulk water infrastructure downstream Mwache Dam will be\nfinanced by the AFD, including the WTP. This subcomponent will also finance TA to the bulk\nwater operator, including the continuation of the service contract that is being financed under\nWaSSIP, or a new management contract for the bulk water operation.\n\n\n**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and sanitation services in underserved**\n**northeastern counties (US$110 million equivalent, of which IDA US$37 million equivalent**\n**and IDA-SUF US$63 million equivalent)**\n\n\n35\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                45
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "13. This component will finance a program of activities designed to improve water supply and\nsanitation services in the northeastern counties such as Wajir town in Wajir County and the Dadaab\nrefugee camp host communities in Garissa County, such program to include (a) construction and\nrehabilitation of water supply, sanitation, and stormwater infrastructure investments, including\nconstruction and rehabilitation of offices for the WSPs; (b) capacity-building and institutionalstrengthening activities of the participating counties and the WSPs, including NRW reduction,\nbilling and revenue collection systems, and developing and implementing a utility business plan;\nand (c) O&M of the water supply and sanitation services.\n\n\n14. **Measures to improve access to safe drinking water in the medium and long terms**\n**differ for Wajir town and the Dadaab host communities because their water sources are**\n**different.** For Wajir town, a consultancy has been launched under WaSSIP to assess the potential\nof groundwater, surface water, rainwater, and other sources to provide adequate and quantity and\nquality water to the town. The consultants will prepare a water masterplan for Wajir town that\nspecifies the priority investments to address the medium- and long-term needs. The consultants\nwill also prepare the designs and specifications for the short-term interventions. For the Dadaab\nhost communities, priority investments will be identified primarily through the ongoing study of\nthe Merti aquifer, an important source of water for communities near the Dadaab refugee camp.\nThe ongoing consultancy, focusing primarily on Wajir town, will also prepare a water masterplan\nfor the Dadaab host communities and the designs and specifications for the short-term\ninterventions. A detailed description about the different challenges in these areas and proposed\nshort, medium, and long-term measures are presented below.\n\n\n15. **Short-term interventions under this component will focus on mitigating the impacts**\n**of water scarcity and drought and recurrence of waterborne diseases, particularly of cholera** .\nThey include treatment or chlorination of water from existing boreholes, rehabilitation of existing\nboreholes and equipping them with solar panels, and provision of water bowsers, plastic and\ncollapsible tanks, and mobile water treatment units. In addition, the project will provide water\nmeters and leak detection equipment to the WSPs to help them reduce NRW. Immediate\ninterventions for Wajir town will include support to the Wajir cholera taskforce to review and\nimplement the cholera control strategy and action plan.\n\n\n16. **Medium and long-term solutions will be developed and implemented to improve**\n**access to safe drinking water and provide sustainable sanitation solutions that address the**\n**entire service chain, including containment, collection and transportation, treatment, reuse,**\n**and disposal** . Under the ongoing WaSSIP, two separate consultancies have been launched to\nprepare feasibility studies and investment plans (short, medium, and long term) for both water and\nsanitation in Wajir town and the Dadaab host communities. The interventions will be different for\nWajir town and the Dadaab host communities as the challenges are different. For Wajir town, the\npotential of different water sources, including groundwater, surface water, rainwater, and other\nsources will be assessed. In addition, innovative sanitation solutions will be assessed to respond to\nthe challenge of a high water table. A detailed description about the different challenges in these\nareas and proposed short, medium, and long-term measures are described below.\n\n\n17. **Improving access to sanitation services will require innovative solutions** . Neither Wajir\ntown nor the communities near the Dadaab refugee camp have a piped sewerage network. Wajir\ntown requires innovative sanitation interventions to address the additional challenge of a high\n\n\n36\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                46
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "water table and the mix of urban and rural densities within the town. In addition, the component\nwill provide trucks, protective equipment, and training to people who collect waste from the bucket\nlatrines. It will provide exhausters for septic sludge collection. It will also pilot on-site sanitation\nsolutions, such as EcoSan toilets and others to be identified under an ongoing sanitation study to\nassess their acceptability for residents. Finally, the component will provide bicycles, motorbikes,\nand other vehicles for use by public health officers in both Wajir and Garissa Counties to roll out\nCLTS and other initiatives. In the medium term, the component will support the establishment of\na proper system for Wajir and the Dadaab host communities for septic sludge collection, treatment,\nand discharge, including the construction and operation of septic sludge handling facilities. For\nthe center of Wajir town, the project will finance wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal.\nFinally, the project will finance shared sanitation facilities in public areas, such as health posts,\nschools, orphanages, and markets in both Wajir town and in the Dadaab host communities.\n\n\n18. **Component 2 will also provide TA to the counties and their WSPs to build capacity**\n**to provide water and sanitation services** . TA will focus on areas such as NRW reduction, billing\nand revenue collection systems, and developing and implementing a utility business plan. The\ncomponent will also support activities to enable the Garissa WSP establish a regional office to\nserve the Dadaab host communities. Until the solar panels are installed at the boreholes (which\nwill reduce the operating cost substantially), the project will also support the WSPs of Wajir and\nGarissa in financing part of their operating costs.\n\n\n**Area-specific Challenges and Status of Water and Sanitation Services**\n\n\n_**Wajir Town**_\n\n\n_Background_\n\n\n19. Wajir town is the main urban center and headquarters for Wajir County. According to the\n2009 population census, Wajir town had a population of about 82,800 inhabitants while the total\ncounty population was about 730,000 inhabitants. The current population of Wajir town is\nestimated to be slightly over 100,000 inhabitants. The town is experiencing rapid population\ngrowth, with commercial developments and more people settling within the core urban center and\nthe peri-urban areas perhaps due to infrastructure development and improved service provision\nwithin the town since the establishment of the county government.\n\n\n_Water and sanitation services_\n\n\nStatus of water supply\n\n\n20. Wajir is a water deficient county with no perennial rivers. The average annual rainfall\nrecorded in Wajir town (1967 to 2003) is 372.8 millimeters at an average yearly total of 30.4 rainy\ndays. [17] The current water demand for Wajir town is estimated at 8,000 cubic meters per day and\nis expected to double in the next 20 years. This includes demand for livestock which is a huge\nconsumer of water. The main source of water for Wajir town is groundwater from a shallow aquifer\nas low as five meters below the ground. The majority of the town’s population has shallow handdug wells within their compounds from where they draw water through simple systems like\n\n17 Wajir/Habaswein Water Supply Project, Final Design Report. Ministry of Water and Irrigation (2012).\n\n\n37\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                47
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "containers attached to ropes. Wajir town has an estimated 20,000 shallow wells scattered in the\nentire town, of which only about 1,235 are protected and about 10 percent have dried up. Water\nfrom these shallow wells is saline and has also shown bacteriological contamination due to lack of\na proper sanitation system for the town. As a result, there are frequent cholera outbreaks,\nparticularly during the rainy seasons.\n\n\n21. Currently, the town has a small water supply and distribution system comprising two\nboreholes, two shallow wells, some elevated storage tanks, and about five kilometers of\ndistribution pipelines. However, only one borehole and one shallow well are currently operational.\nThe water is treated through chlorination inside the boreholes before distribution. The WSP also\ndelivers water from the wells using water bowsers to some outpost centers. A few institutions have\ntheir own boreholes.\n\n\nStatus of sanitation services\n\n\n22. Wajir County has very low coverage of basic sanitation services, well below the national\naverage. About 83 percent of the county’s residents defecate in the open, and none of the county’s\n127 villages has been certified to be open-defecation free. [18] Poor sanitation—high rates of open\ndefecation and poor personal hygiene, including lack of handwashing with soap—has continuously\nexposed the communities in Wajir to waterborne diseases. The 2014 Sanitation Benchmarking\nReport ranked Wajir 44 of 47 counties on sanitation performance, with stunting rates for children\nunder five at 50.7 percent.\n\n\n23. In Wajir town, about 5 percent of the residents depend on septic tanks, 20 percent use\nbucket latrines, and 75 percent defecate in the open. [19] The bucket latrine system, introduced by the\ncolonial government to avoid contamination of the shallow aquifer, has, over time, been poorly\nmanaged. As the population has increased in Wajir town and its surrounding environs, the bucket\nsystem and its management has continued to deteriorate. Poor sludge emptying practices by\nusually inadequately trained or entirely untrained personnel, who lack proper protective gear, has\ncontributed to increased outbreaks of acute watery diarrhea in the county. For example, between\nJuly and December 2015, Wajir County reported 2,000 cases of cholera, with more than 30\ndeaths. [20] A report conducted at the time pointed at the use and emptying of latrine buckets as one\nof the key sources of contamination of drinking water. About 95 percent of the septic sludge is not\ncontained and the remaining 5 percent is not delivered to treatment.\n\n\n24. Wajir County also lacks coordination mechanisms for water, sanitation, and hygiene\nactivities, including lack of an emergency control strategy. A strong, all-inclusive coordination\nmechanism is critical, especially for a county that is prone to cholera and other acute water disease\noutbreaks. Similar to other counties in the northeastern part of the country, Wajir faces logistical\nchallenges in implementing and monitoring sanitation programs, given that its population is\ndispersed over a large territory.\n\n\n18 Kenya Rapid (Resilient Arid Lands Partnership for Integrated Development) Baseline Survey Report.\nMillennium Water Alliance (June 2016).\n19 Wajir Town Sewerage Project, Final Design Report. Ministry of Water and Irrigation (2009).\n20 Technical Report on Wajir Cholera Outbreak Response. Ministry of Health (2015).\n\n\n38\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                48
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "25. In 2009, the MWI initiated a sewerage project intended to mainly cover the central business\ndistrict of Wajir town. The project consisted of construction of trunk sewers, a pumping station,\nand waste stabilization ponds with a capacity of 9,000 cubic meters per day. The project, however,\nwas not completed and is not operational.\n\n\nProvision of water and sanitation services\n\n\n26. In 2013, Wajir County established and registered a limited liability company,\nWAJWASCO, with the mandate of providing water and sanitation services to the county. Although\nthe WSP is responsible for the whole county, currently it is only managing the small water\ndistribution scheme in Wajir town and about ten small water supply schemes. WAJWASCO has\napproximately 50 water connections in Wajir town (48 households and two institutions) with an\naverage tariff of KSh 100 per cubic meter. Sanitation is still largely managed by the county through\nprovision of septic sludge and bucket latrine waste collection and disposal, although the county\nintends to eventually handover full responsibility for water and sanitation services to the WSP.\nBoth billing and revenue collection are done manually. Although, this is sufficient for the current\nscheme, an increase in the number of connections would require investment in a more efficient\nbilling system.\n\n\n_**Dadaab refugee camp host communities in Garissa County**_\n\n\n_Background_\n\n\n27. Garissa County hosts a refugee population of a total of 343,000 refugees in five camps in\nDadaab subcounty. These are Dagahaley, Ifo, Ifo 2, Hagadera, and Kambioos. Kenyan law requires\nrefugees to reside in a camp, and their movements outside the camp are heavily restricted. About\n160,000 people have settled within a 50 kilometers radius of the five refugee camps (here called\nthe Dadaab host communities). Of this, about 60,000 inhabitants live in and around the town of\nDadaab, where the main office of UNHCR is located. The WSDP will focus on improving water\nand sanitation services for the communities living in Dadaab town and in settlements within the\nimmediate vicinity of the camps.\n\n\n28. Due to the presence of the refugees, Dadaab town hosts numerous United Nation agencies\nand nongovernmental organizations. These include UNHCR, UNICEF, Lutheran World\nFederation, Care Kenya, Danish Refugee Council, the German Society for International\nCollaboration, National Council of Churches in Kenya, and Oxfam Handicap. UNHCR manages\nthe provision of basic services at the refugee camps. However, Garissa County is responsible for\nproviding basic services, including water and sanitation, to the Dadaab host communities.\n\n\n29. The Government of Kenya has expressed its intent to close down the Dadaab refugee camp.\nA tripartite agreement between the Government of Kenya, UNHCR, and the Government of\nSomalia was signed to facilitate the repatriation of the refugees. However, the Government is not\nforcibly repatriating people, and is instead encouraging people to move through provision of a\npackage of assistance. The Government recently extended the closing date from November 2016\nto May 2017. Some of the infrastructure in the refugee camps is expected to be used by the host\ncommunities once the camps are closed.\n\n\n_Water and sanitation services_\n\n\n39\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                49
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "Status of water supply\n\n\n30. The main source of water for the residents of Dadaab for both the host communities and\nthe refugee camps is groundwater from the Merti aquifer. There are about 56 boreholes supplying\nwater to the host communities. There is concern that the Merti aquifer is becoming depleted in the\nvicinity of Dadaab area, although the status is not clear. A study of the Merti aquifer is currently\nunder way under WaSSIP, which will assess the entire aquifer and develop a plan for its\ndevelopment, monitoring, protection, and overall sustainable management. Other sources of water\nfor the host communities include rainwater collected in about 30 water pans and occasionally\ncollected through roof catchment.\n\n\n31. Current water systems for the host communities comprise boreholes, pumps, ground\nmasonry or elevated steel tanks, and some small reticulation networks and water kiosks. Most of\nthe infrastructure is dilapidated and is in dire need of rehabilitation and expansion.\n\n\nStatus of sanitation services\n\n\n32. Garissa County has very low sanitation coverage. About 77 percent of the county’s\nresidents defecate in the open, and no single village has been certified as open defecation free. [21]\nThe 2014 Sanitation Benchmarking report put the stunting rate in Garissa at approximately 50\npercent. Although sanitation statistics do not exist for Dadaab and Fafi subcounties as the host\ncommunities of the refugee camps, county officials estimate that about 30 percent of residents\nhave access to latrines while 70 percent defecate in the open. Sanitation-related disease outbreaks\noften spread across the refugee camps and the host communities, due to the frequent interactions\nof their residents. For example, the 2015 cholera outbreak (index case reported in camp), had 1,798\nreported cases, of which 719 cases were from the host communities. [22]\n\n\n33. Although many counties in Kenya have benefited from the Ministry of Health’s CLTS\napproach (5,303 villages had been declared open-defecation free by November 2016), Garissa\nCounty has not, due mainly to limited capacity and resources, been able to implement the CLTS\nand other sanitation promotion approaches. The CLTS program is yet to be introduced in Dadaab\nand Fafi subcounties.\n\n\n**Interventions to Be Supported under component**\n\n\n34. **Details of the proposed short-, medium-, and long-term activities for Wajir town and**\n**Dadaab town and host communities to be supported under Component 2 are presented in**\n**Table 2.1** .\n\n\n21 Kenya Rapid (Resilient Arid Lands Partnership for Integrated Development) Baseline Survey Report,\nMillennium Water Alliance (June 2016); Ministry of Heath/UNICEF 2015.\n22 County public health officer, Garissa.\n\n\n40\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "study",
+                    "confidence": 0.6940870881080627,
+                    "start": 69,
+                    "end": 70
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "WaSSIP",
+                    "confidence": 0.9737482070922852,
+                    "start": 79,
+                    "end": 80
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Merti aquifer",
+                    "confidence": 0.929155707359314,
+                    "start": 29,
+                    "end": 31
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Status of sanitation services",
+                    "confidence": 0.6578685641288757,
+                    "start": 173,
+                    "end": 177
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Garissa County",
+                    "confidence": 0.839256763458252,
+                    "start": 179,
+                    "end": 181
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "residents",
+                    "confidence": 0.575510561466217,
+                    "start": 13,
+                    "end": 14
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "2014 Sanitation Benchmarking report",
+                    "confidence": 0.8165566921234131,
+                    "start": 217,
+                    "end": 221
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "report",
+                    "confidence": 0.6686154007911682,
+                    "start": 220,
+                    "end": 221
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Garissa County",
+                    "confidence": 0.8643091917037964,
+                    "start": 179,
+                    "end": 181
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.996756374835968,
+                    "start": 217,
+                    "end": 218
+                },
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.9637261629104614,
+                    "start": 217,
+                    "end": 218
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "sanitation statistics",
+                    "confidence": 0.8187988996505737,
+                    "start": 233,
+                    "end": 235
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "refugee camps",
+                    "confidence": 0.53468257188797,
+                    "start": 249,
+                    "end": 251
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "CLTS",
+                    "confidence": 0.5475661754608154,
+                    "start": 347,
+                    "end": 348
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Millennium Water Alliance",
+                    "confidence": 0.5834028720855713,
+                    "start": 479,
+                    "end": 482
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.974702775478363,
+                    "start": 300,
+                    "end": 301
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Baseline Survey Report",
+                    "confidence": 0.6691789627075195,
+                    "start": 475,
+                    "end": 478
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Millennium Water Alliance",
+                    "confidence": 0.9340406656265259,
+                    "start": 479,
+                    "end": 482
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.9904142022132874,
+                    "start": 464,
+                    "end": 465
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.9564689993858337,
+                    "start": 492,
+                    "end": 493
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                50
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Table 2.1: Proposed Water and Sanitation Activities under Component 2|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Wajir Town**|**Wajir Town**|**Wajir Town**|\n||**Short-term Interventions**|**Medium and Long-term Interventions**|\n|**Water supply**| <br>Treatment or chlorination of water<br>from existing boreholes<br> <br>Rehabilitation of existing boreholes and<br>equipping them with solar panels<br> <br>Provision of water bowsers, plastic<br>tanks, and collapsible tanks<br> <br>Provision of mobile water treatment<br>units<br> <br>Provision of water meters and leak<br>detection equipment to Wajir WSP to<br>help in reduction of NRW| <br>Development of additional water sources (to<br>be determined by the masterplan<br>recommendation)<br> <br>Water treatment, transmission, storage, and<br>distribution infrastructure development<br> <br>|\n|**Sanitation**| <br>Pilot different on-site sanitation<br>solutions such as EcoSan toilets and<br>others to be identified under the<br>ongoing sanitation study to assess their<br>acceptability for residents<br> <br>Support for the Wajir cholera taskforce<br>to implement the cholera control<br>strategy including:<br>`o` <br>Regular water quality surveillance<br>`o` <br>Monitoring of environmental<br>health activities<br>`o` <br>Strengthening of county<br>coordination structures<br>`o` <br>Continuous community hygiene<br>education<br> <br>Provision of trucks, protective<br>equipment, and training to bucket<br>latrines waste collectors<br> <br>Provision of exhausters for septic<br>sludge collection<br> <br>Provision of bicycles, motorbikes, and<br>other vehicles for use by public health<br>officers for sanitation initiatives<br> <br>Training of county public health<br>officers and community resource<br>persons on sanitation approaches,<br>including CLTS and sanitation<br>marketing| <br>Establishment of a proper system for septic<br>sludge management (containment, collection<br>and transportation, treatment, reuse, and<br>disposal)<br> <br>Construction and operation of septic sludge<br>treatment facilities<br> <br>Development of a sewerage system and<br>wastewater treatment plant for Wajir town<br>central business district<br> <br>Construction of shared sanitation facilities in<br>public areas, for example at health posts,<br>schools, orphanages, and markets<br> <br>Technical support for initiation of CLTS and<br>follow-up activities at the village and<br>household levels<br> <br>Technical support for design and<br>implementation of behavior change<br>communication campaigns<br> <br>|\n|**TA and**<br>**capacity**<br>**strengthening**| <br>Training of county water department<br>and the WSP staff<br> <br>Provision of a budget for operations<br>until solar panels are installed at<br>boreholes which will substantially<br>reduce the operation costs<br> <br>Conducting a tariff study<br> <br>Consultancy for a utility turnaround<br>program| <br>Technical support to Wajir County to<br>develop relevant water and sanitation<br>services policies and regulations<br> <br>Technical support to Wajir WSP for<br>improvement of their operations (NRW<br>reduction, billing and revenue collection,<br>and the like) based on the utility turnaround<br>program <br>|\n\n\n41\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                51
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Dadaab Town and Host Communities|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n||**Short-term Interventions**|**Medium and Long-term Interventions**|\n|**Water supply**| <br>Treatment or chlorination of water<br>from existing boreholes<br> <br>Rehabilitation of existing boreholes and<br>equipping them with solar panels<br> <br>Provision of water bowsers, plastic, and<br>collapsible tanks<br> <br>Provision of mobile water treatment<br>units<br> <br>Training of water user associations on<br>management of community water<br>schemes<br> <br>Provision of water meters and leak<br>detection equipment to Garissa WSP to<br>help in reduction of NRW<br> <br>Support Garissa WSP to establish<br>Dadaab regional office| <br>Drilling and equipping of new boreholes<br>with solar panels/hybrid systems<br> <br>Establishing a water quality control program<br>and introduce water treatment (chlorination)<br>where necessary<br> <br>Construction of additional water kiosks<br> <br>Construction of additional water storage<br>tanks<br> <br>Construction of water reticulation systems<br> <br>Construction of animal water troughs<br>|\n|**Sanitation**| <br>Provision of exhausters for septic<br>sludge collection<br> <br>Pilot different on-site sanitation<br>solutions based on the experience of<br>United Nations-supported on-site<br>solution inside the refugee camps to be<br>identified under the ongoing sanitation<br>study to assess their acceptability for<br>residents<br> <br>Provision of bicycles, motorbikes, and<br>other vehicles for use by public health<br>officers for sanitation initiatives<br> <br>Consultancy on socio-cultural<br>determinants of sanitation behavior<br>(basis for behavior change campaigns)<br> <br>Training of county public health<br>officers and community resource<br>persons on sanitation approaches,<br>including CLTS and sanitation<br>marketing| <br>Establishment of a proper system for septic<br>sludge management (containment, collection<br>and transportation, treatment, reuse and<br>disposal)<br> <br>Construction and operation of septic sludge<br>handling facilities<br> <br>Construction of shared sanitation facilities in<br>public areas, for example at health posts,<br>schools, orphanages, and markets<br> <br>Technical support for initiation of CLTS and<br>follow up activities at the village and<br>household level<br> <br>Technical support for design and<br>implementation of behavior change<br>communication campaigns<br> <br>Support for establishment and capacity<br>building of a county third-party certification<br>team for open-defecation free certification|\n|**TA and**<br>**capacity**<br>**strengthening**| <br>Support to Garissa WSP to establish<br>and operate a regional office to serve<br>the Dadaab host communities <br> <br>Training of county water department<br>and WSP staff<br> <br>Provision of a budget for operations<br>until solar panels at boreholes are<br>installed which will significantly<br>reduce the operation costs <br> <br>Conducting a tariff study for the entire<br>Garissa service area<br> <br>Consultancy for a utility turnaround<br>program for the Garissa WSP| <br>Technical support to Garissa WSP for<br>improvement of their operations (NRW<br>reduction, billing and revenue collection,<br>and the like) based on the utility turnaround<br>program <br> <br>Technical support to Garissa County to<br>develop relevant water and sanitation<br>services policies and regulations<br>|\n\n\n42\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                52
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Component 3: National performance-based financing (US$40.7 million equivalent, of which**\n**IDA-SUF US$37 million equivalent)**\n\n\n_Subcomponent 3.1: Support for water and sanitation infrastructure investments and services_\n_(US$38.5 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$35 million equivalent)_\n\n\n35. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to support the preparation\nand implementation of the National PBF for participating counties, WSBs, and WSPs, including\n(a) construction of new or rehabilitation of existing water and sanitation infrastructure; (b) support\ntowards the preparation of applications, final designs, bidding documents and construction\nsupervision; and (c) technical assistance for improving water and sanitation services, and M&E.\n\n\n_Subcomponent 3.2: Technical assistance for national performance-based financing (US$2.2_\n_million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$2 million equivalent)_\n\n\n36. This subcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to strengthen the capacity\nof WASREB for management, implementation and coordination, and M&E of the National PBF,\nincluding (a) evaluation of proposals (to identify high-return investments and activities); (b)\nestablishment and implementation of a comprehensive M&E system; (c) and provision of training\nto participating county governments, WSBs, and WSPs involved in implementation of\nsubcomponent 3.1 on issues such as implementation of safeguard policies, procurement, and FM.\n\n\n_**Context**_\n\n\n37. The Kenya Water Act (2002) and the 2010 constitution has introduced important reforms\nin the Water Supply and Sanitation (water and sanitation services) sector, including establishment\nof commercially oriented WSPs responsible for service delivery and cost-reflective tariffs through\nan independent WASREB tasked with reviewing and approving tariff applications and monitoring\nand reporting on sector performance. Also, the Water Act 2016, recently approved by the\nParliament and the Senate and signed by the President, now awaiting implementation, intends to\nbring the water legislation in line with the constitution and further clarify the roles of the two levels\nof government and the water and sanitation services institutions. However, there has been limited\nprogress in achieving Vision 2030 of universal coverage, with provision of urban water and\nsanitation services not keeping pace with Kenya’s high urbanization rates. The water coverage in\nurban areas is 82 percent and sewerage coverage is about 31 percent. The status of water and\nsanitation services vary widely across counties and WSPs, with challenges both in improving\ncoverage as well as in achieving operational and financial sustainability. More than half of the\nWSPs do not meet their operational costs and NRW presents a huge challenge, ranging from 40\npercent to 60 percent across the counties. Thus, achieving the SDG of universal access to water\nsupply and sanitation will require strong institutions, huge investments, tapping different sources\nof financing, and improving operational efficiencies.\n\n\n38. **WASREB has identified a cluster of indicators for improving water and sanitation**\n**services** . These are (a) quality of services (improving coverage of water supply and sanitation\nservices, drinking water quality, and hours of supply); (b) economic efficiency (reducing staff\ncosts, improving cost coverage, and improving revenue collection efficiency); and (c) operational\nsustainability (reducing NRW, improving staff productivity, and improving metering ratio).\n\n\n43\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                53
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "Supporting WASREB’s initiatives, the PBF will encourage the WSPs to improve access to water\nand sanitation services and improve the operational and financial performance of the WSPs, based\non an agreed set of performance measures. In addition, the PBF will encourage counties to design\nand implement programs and policies to improve water resource management (for example,\npromoting IUWM programs such as rainwater catchment, wastewater recycling, demand-side\nmanagement, and the like).\n\n\n_**Priority areas of focus: Three windows of financing**_\n\n\n39. Focusing on the current challenges in the sector, there are three windows of financing under\nthe PBF component. The WSPs, counties, and WSBs can apply under any one or more of the\nwindows, as described below. [23] The interested sector agencies can leverage other funds, including\ncommercial financing or other donor funds, in combination with the funds allocated through this\ncomponent. The blend of funds (PBF under the WSDP and commercial or other borrowings) can\nsupport rapid achievement of the sector targets along with improving service delivery.\n\n\n**(a) Improving access to water and sanitation services** (sewerage and fecal sludge\nmanagement). This includes the expansion of water supply and sanitation services by\nconstruction of new or rehabilitation of existing water supply/sanitation infrastructure.\n\n\n(i) Improving water supply services includes:\n\n\n        - Network extensions to connect new customers to water services, including\nhousehold water points and kiosks;\n\n        - Water source augmentation, treatment, and distribution works; and\n\n        - Source protection.\n\n(ii) Improving sewerage services and fecal sludge management includes:\n\n\n        - Network extension to connect new customers to sewer services; and\n\n        - Sewerage and septic sludge treatment augmentation, including\ndecentralised treatment facilities.\n\n**(b) Reducing NRW** . NRW reduction to address physical and commercial losses,\naccording to WASREB NRW management standards.\n\n\n**(c) Improving revenue and/or reducing costs of supply.** Proposed interventions for\nimproving revenue will ensure that all connections are metered, with volumetric\ntariffs. The proposals will include the improvement of:\n\n\n      - Customer database through customer identification survey and standard\ncomputerized systems;\n\n      - Billing and collection efficiency; and\n\n\n23 Individual WSPs can submit their proposals, duly approved by their respective county. However, in case there\nis a joint proposal by two or more WSPs, the county will be responsible for preparing and submitting the proposal.\n\n\n44\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                54
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "      - Collection of revenue from informal settlements.\n\n40. The proposals will include programs to manage capital expenditures and/or reduce costs of\nO&M through various measures, including\n\n\n    - Adoption of energy-efficient pumps through energy audits;\n\n    - Reduction of staff costs; and\n\n    - Use of appropriate technology.\n\n41. The abovementioned three priority areas and windows of financing will be reviewed by\nWASREB and the World Bank during implementation and adjusted, if needed.\n\n\n_**PBF subcomponents**_\n\n\n42. The PBF component will comprise the following two subcomponents:\n\n\n    - **Subcomponent 3.1: Support for water and sanitation infrastructure investments**\n**(US$38.5 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$35 million equivalent).** This\nsubcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to support the preparation\nand implementation of the national performance-based financing (PBF) for\nparticipating counties, WSBs, and WSPs, including (a) construction of new or\nrehabilitation of existing water and sanitation infrastructure; (b) support toward the\npreparation of applications, final designs, bidding documents, and construction\nsupervision; and (c) TA for improving water and sanitation services, and monitoring\nand evaluation (M&E).\n\n\n    - **Subcomponent 3.2: Technical assistance for performance-based financing**\n**(US$2.2 million equivalent of which IDA-SUF US$2 million equivalent).** This\nsubcomponent will finance a program of activities designed to strengthen WASREB’s\ncapacity for management, implementation and coordination, and M&E of the National\nPBF, including (a) evaluation of proposals (to identify high-return investments and\nactivities); (b) establishment and implementation of a comprehensive M&E system;\n(c) provision of training to the participating county governments, WSBs and WSPs\ninvolved in implementation of subcomponent 3.1 on issues such as implementation of\nsafeguards, procurement, and FM.\n\n\n43. Based on the proposals accepted by WASREB, the baseline will be established for the\nproposed indicators and targets agreed with the selected agencies. The PBF will support the\nfollowing, building on good practices in the water and sanitation services sector:\n\n\n    - **Promoting cost efficient investments.** The PBF will award proposals which support\ncost efficient investments, reflecting the maximum output that can be achieved per\ndollar invested. WASREB will carry out due diligence for selecting the most cost\nefficient proposals for financing under this component. This is reflected under the\nselection criteria presented below.\n\n\n45\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                55
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "    - **Incentivizing performance improvements** . The PBF component is designed to\nencourage both the expansion of access to services and improvements in delivery of\nservices, and thereby support the Government in achieving its 2030 water and\nsanitation services targets.\n\n\n    - **Leveraging additional funds.** The interested sector agencies can leverage other\nfunds, including commercial financing or other donor funds or both, in combination\nwith the funds allocated through this component. The blend of funds (PBF under the\nWSDP and commercial or other borrowing) can support rapid achievement of the\nsector targets along with improving service delivery. For example, Ruiru WSP can\navail funds from the KPWF (bond facility under preparation) [24] only if its proposal for\nwater and sanitation services is financially viable. The ‘viability gap funding’ can be\nachieved through this PBF component.\n\n\n44. The WSPs will have to provide evidence that at least 80 percent of the performance targets\nhave been achieved. WASREB will carry out an independent verification of results achieved.\n\n_**Project eligibility criteria**_\n\n\n45. The following eligibility criteria apply to the WSPs and counties.\n\n\n_WSP and counties eligibility criteria_\n\n\n46. The WSPs must meet the following criteria:\n\n\n(a) Legal status: The WSP should hold a valid license.\n\n\n(b) Robust performance of the WSP\n\n\n      - The WSP has recorded positive and/or improving cash flow over recent financial\nyears.\n\n\n(c) Governance and management capacity\n\n\n      - The WSP and county meet corporate governance guidelines set by the regulator.\n\n\n      - The WSP management, Board of Directors, and counties support the WSP\nborrowing and participation in the PBF fund.\n\n\n24 Over the last year the World Bank’s Water Global Practice has been working with the Dutch Government and\nthe Government of Kenya to explore the possibility of establishing a privately financed pooled water bond. In 2007,\nover 30 WSPs and community-based organizations secured commercial finance from KRep Bank and in 2010 five\nadditional commercial banks started providing longer-term financing to the WSPs. The pooled bond facility is an\nimportant next step in that it will tap longer-term resources from pension funds and insurance companies. By\npooling risk, the intention is to increase the volume of commercial financing available, extend the tenor, make more\nefficient use of credit enhancements, and encourage a larger pool of WSPs to explore commercial financing. Design\nwork on the pooled fund is continuing with a tentative offering being explored for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.\n\n\n46\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                56
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "      - Management of the WSP has sufficient technical and financial capabilities\nincluding project management skills (successful completion of projects funded\nunder the Water Services Trust Fund is a good indicator).\n\n\n(d) Cost recovery tariff\n\n\n      - The WSPs are charging connection fees and consumer tariffs approved by the\nregulator.\n\n\n      - Tariff levels are adequate to cover O&M costs, maintain existing assets, and meet\ndebt obligations.\n\n\n      - If a tariff increase is required during the life of the loan, as indicated in the\nfinancial model, the WSP will capture this intention in the business plan and\nfinancial projections.\n\n\n_**Proposal eligibility criteria**_\n\n\n47. **Proposals must fit under one of the three windows identified as priority areas and**\n**need to demonstrate sustainability** . They must fulfil the following criteria:\n\n\n(a) **Expansion of water supply services** .\n\n\n       - The proposed intervention must be source sustainable.\n\n\n       - The technical design should sustain the proposed intervention.\n\n\n       - The financial analysis should demonstrate sustainability of the proposed\nproject.\n\n\n(b) **Expansion of sanitation including sewerage and fecal management.**\n\n\n       - The technical design should reflect a cost-effective system (conventional\nversus decentralized versus on-site systems).\n\n\n       - The proposal should include the introduction of ‘ring-fenced sewerage\naccounts’ for cost accounting.\n\n\n       - The proposal should include the introduction of cost-reflective sanitation user\ncharges as part of the water bill.\n\n\n(c) **Reduction of NRW** _._ Proposal should be based on an NRW strategy addressing\nphysical and commercial losses, according to WASREB NRW management\nstandards. Eligible activities (among others) would be improvements in customer\ndatabase and billing and collection efficiency, performance-based NRW reduction\ncontracts, and works contracts to establish DMAs, and the like.\n\n\n47\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                57
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "(d) **Improving revenue and/or reducing costs of supply** _._ Eligible activities (among\nothers) would be:\n\n\n       - Reducing energy used per unit of water delivered.\n\n\n       - Establishing metered connections.\n\n\n       - Introducing volumetric tariffs.\n\n\n       - Improving customer database through customer identification survey and/or\nstandard computerized systems.\n\n\n       - Increasing billing and collection efficiency.\n\n\n       - Increasing revenue from informal settlements through use of “water ATMs”\n(water dispensers operating with prepaid cards) or other means.\n\n\n       - Analyzing tariffs for justifying tariff proposals.\n\n\n**(e)** **Technical feasibility.**\n\n\n       - Technical designs and documentation for the subprojects shall be in\naccordance with design standards issued by the MWI.\n\n\n       - Effective public consultation at the feasibility stage with the necessary\nstakeholder groups.\n\n\n       - Legal due diligence report satisfactory on all the land issues as assets will be\nbuilt on already identified land. Land costs will not be included in the proposal.\n\n\n(f) **Financial feasibility and economic viability** .\n\n\n       - The proposal demonstrates the project’s financial and economic viability.\n\n\n       - The project is capable of generating positive cash flow.\n\n\n       - Customers have capacity and willingness to pay for services rendered.\n\n\n       - The WSPs demonstrate capability to translate additional water supply and new\ncustomers from the project into augmented revenue.\n\n\n_**Project selection criteria**_\n\n\n48. The project selection criteria will prioritize the following:\n\n\n(a) Expanding access to water supply, sewerage services, fecal sludge management:\nPriority will be given to projects which:\n\n\n48\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                58
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "       - Provide the lowest ratio between investment costs per person gaining access.\n\n\n       - Improve reliability of water supply (moving towards 24/7 supply).\n\n\n(b) Reducing NRW: Priority will be given to projects which:\n\n\n       - Provide lowest ratio between investment cost and cubic meters of NRW\nreduced.\n\n\n       - Improve reliability of supply (moving towards 24/7 supply).\n\n\n(c) Improving revenue and/or reducing costs of supply:\n\n\n       - Interventions which provide lowest ratio between investment costs per person\ngaining access.\n\n\n_**Financial incentives for successful implementation of PBF activities**_\n\n\n49. IDA will provide funding for the PBF through the IDA-SUF, on the terms the Government\nhas selected. [25] In addition, the Government will include additional incentives for good\nperformance. On-lending terms under this component would be attractive compared to the market\ncommercial financing at a 15 percent interest rate payable from year two. Also, the potential\nrevenue stream under the proposed investments could be sufficient pay back a ‘blend’ of the soft\nloans (on IDA terms) along with commercial borrowings, enabling a faster achievement of the\nsector targets. The financial incentive of the World Bank’s actual rate of interest can then be\napplicable to those agencies which achieve a minimum of 80 percent of the agreed targets.\n\n\n50. The PBF can gradually evolve into a sectorwide approach that is applying the PBF program\nto the entire water supply and sanitation sector, irrespective of sources of financing.\n\n\n**Independent reviews, technical, and social audits**\n\n\n51. WASREB will carry out independent reviews of the projects, including technical and social\naudits. Technical audits will be carried out to review technical aspects during implementation and\npost completion of projects. Social audits will be carried out to get feedback from customers on\nthe services delivered. These reviews can be supported under the TA program.\n\n\n_**Funding arrangements and loan repayment**_\n\n\n52. The funding threshold for proposals is a minimum of US$1 million under each window of\nfinancing. The commitment of funds will be 100 percent up-front, disbursed through direct\npayments and statements of expenditures (SoEs). The Recipients of PBF funds will have ringfenced accounts as described in the FM section of this project appraisal document.\n\n\n25 IDA-SUF provides various options of maturity limit, amortization profile, and use of fixed or variable interest\nrates. These options, in the range of LIBOR + 0.67 percent to LIBOR + 1.6 percent of interest, with grace periods of\n5 to 9 years and maturities between 24 and 30 years, are much more attractive compared to the market rate of\ninterest of 15 percent to be paid back from the first or second year of taking loan.\n\n\n49\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                59
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "_**Implementation arrangements**_\n\n\n53. WASREB will oversee the activities under the PBF program. WASREB will be responsible\nfor designing and announcing the program, inviting applications, and reviewing and accepting\nproposals for funding. However, the MWI will approve the program design and any changes.\nWASREB will also be responsible for reviewing progress of the activities, including approving\nthe financial support for the accepted applications. The MWI will be the budget holder of funds\nunder this program. Based on the applications accepted by WASREB, the MWI will request the\nNT to release the funds to the counties of the WSPs or directly to the WSPs. WASREB will be\nprovided with TA under the component to conduct independent financial and technical audits of\nthe supported activities, review the achievements of the activities, conduct training for their staff,\nand the like. The counties will be responsible for monitoring activities carried out under the\nprogram, including reporting progress to WASREB. WASREB will have a small program support\nunit for managing the PBF program, comprising its own staff and consultants. WASREB would\nlike to hire two financial consultants and two technical consultants for supporting the management\nof this program.\n\n\n**Figure 2.1: Flow Chart on Institutional Arrangements**\n\n\n_**Processing steps**_\n\n\n54. The WASREB processing steps are provided in Table 2.2, including sensitizing, inviting,\nand awarding proposals. The workshop introducing the WSPs to the PBF component was carried\nout on December 5, 2016.\n\n\n50\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                60
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Table 2.2: WASREB Processing Steps|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**Activity **|**Time Frame **|\n|<br>WSP sensitization|<br>December 5, 2016 (complete)|\n|Advertise for proposals|December, 30 2016 (complete)|\n|Identification of participating WSPs|End of January 2017 (complete)|\n|TA provided to the short listed candidates|End of February 2017 (complete)|\n|Submission of proposals to WASREB|End of April 2017|\n|Evaluation of proposals by WASREB|End of June 2017|\n|Award of the projects|July 2017|\n\n\n**Readiness for PBF**\n\n\n55. WASREB has identified preliminary proposals to be funded under the PBF component,\nwith a total estimated cost of US$38 million. In addition, the eligible WSPs will be identified by\nWASREB as up-front eligible candidates for submission of proposals under any of the three\nwindows of financing.\n\n\n**Component 4: Project management** _(US$3.3 million equivalent, of which IDA-SUF US$3_\n_million equivalent)_ .\n\n\n56. This component will finance a program of activities designed to strengthen the capacity of\nthe Recipient for project management, implementation and coordination, and M&E, including (a)\nestablishment and implementation of a comprehensive M&E system; (b) training of the\nimplementing agencies and county governments on implementation of safeguards, procurement,\nand financial management; and (c) financing studies identified during implementation and\npreparation of follow-on projects as needed.\n\n\n**B.** **Financing Plan**\n\n\n**Table 2.3: WSDP Project Costs (US$330 million)**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Component 1|IDA|IDA-SUF|Government|Total|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1: Rehabilitation and expansion of urban**<br>**water supply and sanitation services in the coastal**<br>**region**||**160.0**|**16.0**|**176.0**|\n|Subcomponent 1.1: Support to the coastal counties||120.0|12.0|132.0|\n|Subcomponent 1.2: Support to the coast bulk water<br>services provider||40.0|4.0|44.0|\n|**Component 2: Expansion of water supply and**<br>**sanitation services in underserved northeastern**<br>**counties**|**37.0**|**63.0**|**10.0**|**110.0**|\n|**Component 3: National performance-based financing**||**37.0**|**3.7**|**40.7**|\n|Subcomponent 3.1: Support for water and sanitation<br>infrastructure investments and services||35.0|3.5|38.5|\n|Subcomponent 3.2: Technical assistance for national<br>performance-based financing||2.0|0.2|2.2|\n|**Component 4: Project management**||**3.0**|**0.3**|**3.3**|\n|**Total Project Cost**|**37.0**|**263.0**|**30.0**|**330.0**|\n\n\n51\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                61
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "57. **The NT will enter into subsidiary agreements with the CWSB and into participation**\n**agreements with the participating counties.** In turn, counties with autonomous WSPs will enter\ninto participation agreements with them to ensure that the project funds flow directly to them to\ncover expenditures for water supply and sanitation services (counties with non-autonomous WSPs\nwill not do so). The agreements will specify the amount to be allocated to each implementing\nagency to undertake specific activities and the terms under which counties and WSBs repay the\nfunds to the NT (if applicable). At least one subsidiary agreement will be executed before\neffectiveness. Signed subsidiary or participation agreements for each implementing agency are a\ncondition of disbursement to the entity entering into the agreement.\n\n\n52\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                62
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements**\n\n**KENYA: Water and Sanitation Development Project**\n\n**A.** **Project Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n1. **Overall responsibility.** The Recipient is the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The\nNT will be responsible for ensuring that project resources are budgeted for and released. The OAG\nwill be responsible for auditing project accounts. The project financing will be a mix of IDA-SUF\nCredit and an IDA Credit to the NT. The IDA Credit will be used to support activities to mitigate\nthe impact of the drought currently affecting Wajir and Garissa Counties, and to help the counties\nbecome more resilient in the face of future droughts.\n\n\n2. **Overall implementation arrangements.** The proposed WSDP will be implemented using\nexisting organizational structures in line with the constitution, incorporating lessons learned and\nexperience gained in the implementation of the KWSCRP and WaSSIP. Thus, counties will\nimplement county-specific activities, and WSBs (or their legal successors), which are owned by\nthe national government, will implement activities that involve more than one county.\n\n\n3. **A National Project Steering Committee, which will be established within six months**\n**after Project effectiveness, will provide overall project oversight, policy guidance, and**\n**approve the project’s annual workplans and budgets** . The Cabinet Secretary of the MWI and\nthe Chair of the Committee in charge of Water Affairs at the Council of Governors will co-chair\nthe steering committee. Other members of the committee will include representatives (at the chief\nexecutive/Principal Secretary level) of the National Treasury, Ministry of Devolution and\nPlanning, and the chief executive of the Council of Governors, governors of the participating\ncounties and any other appropriate representatives identified and appointed by the committee. The\nState Department of Water Services at the MWI and the secretariat of the Council of Governors\nwill provide joint secretariat services to the committee.\n\n\n4. **A Technical Committee, which will be established within six months after Project**\n**effectiveness, will be responsible for addressing any cross-cutting technical issues and**\n**challenges in project implementation.** It will review project progress reports, financial\nmanagement and audit reports, and provide technical guidance on project implementation. The\nWater Secretary at the MWI will chair the committee. Its members will include Chief Executive\nOfficer of the Council of Governors, the Chief Executive Officers of the Coast and Northern Water\nServices Boards and of WASREB, County Executive Committee members representing in charge\nof water affairs, and others as appointed by the technical committee. The State Department of\nWater Services at the MWI will provide secretariat services to the committee.\n\n\n5. **Executing agency.** The State Department of Water and Sanitation Services in the MWI is\nthe executing agency. A PCU has been established and will be responsible for overall project\nmanagement and for monitoring and reporting. The PCU is headed by a project coordinator who\nis reporting to the Principal Secretary through the Water Secretary. The ministry has informed the\nWorld Bank about the structure and staffing of the rest of the PCU. Given that all participating\nentities are procuring, implementing, and monitoring their own project activities, the PCU is lean\nand integrated within existing structures. The executing agency will be strengthened with teams of\n\n\n53\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                63
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "consultants who will help to build the capacity of counties and their WSPs for procurement, FM,\nM&E, safeguards management, and utility reform.\n\n\n6. **Implementing agencies.** Counties and their WSPs will be the main implementing\nagencies, because according to the Water Act 2016, they are responsible for all county water\nsupply and sanitation infrastructure and services. WSBs (or their legal successors) will, in future,\nonly be responsible for implementing inter-county activities. Therefore, the CWSB will be the\nimplementing agency for the bulk water subcomponent under component 1, because the bulk water\nsystem runs across four counties. The WSPs will do most of the procurement, because they will\nbe in charge of all procurement for countywide water supply and sanitation infrastructure. The\ncounties will procure contracts to support functions that are not delegated to the WSPs, such as\nenforcing construction codes for septic tanks and the like. Counties will, therefore, procure small\ncontracts (mostly TA) up to a threshold in accordance with the findings of the procurement\ncapacity assessment for counties. The MWI and WASREB will do any procurement needed to\ncarry out their responsibilities under the project. Each implementing agency will appoint a\ndedicated PCU. Table 3.1 gives an overview of the implementing agencies.\n\n\n**Table 3.1: WSDP Implementing Agencies**\n\n|Component|Implementing Agencies|\n|---|---|\n|Subcomponent 1.1| <br>Mombasa County and MOWASCO<br> <br>Kwale County and KWAWASCO<br> <br>Taita Taveta County and TAVEVO<br> <br>Kilifi County, KIWASCO, and MAWASCO|\n|Subcomponent 1.2| <br>CWSB|\n|Component 2| <br>Wajir County and WAJWASCO<br> <br>Garissa County and Garissa Water and Sewerage Company|\n|Component 3| <br>Various counties and their WSPs. The counties and their WSPs will only be known<br>when WASREB has selected the investments. The selection will be done for annual<br>programs. Therefore, the participating counties and WSPs will change during the<br>project implementation period.<br> <br>WSBs can also apply to WASREB for financing inter-County infrastructure.<br>Therefore, it is also possible that a WSB might become an implementing agency<br>under this component.<br> <br>WASREB will implement activities related to the development and implementation<br>of the program, but will not be engaged in any implementation of infrastructure.|\n|Component 4| <br>MWI|\n\n\n\n7. **Implementation arrangements for the PBF component.** WASREB will oversee the\nactivities under the PBF program this component is supporting. WASREB will be responsible for\ndesigning and announcing the program, inviting applications, and reviewing proposals. However,\nthe MWI will have to approve the program design and periodic changes to it. WASREB will also\nbe responsible for reviewing progress of the activities, including approving the financial support\nfor the accepted applications. The MWI will be the budget holder of the funds under this\ncomponent and, based on the applications accepted by WASREB, will request the NT to release\nthe funds to the counties of the WSPs or directly to the WSBs whose application has been accepted.\nWASREB will receive TA under the component to conduct independent financial and technical\naudits of the supported activities, review the achievements of the activities, conduct training for\ntheir staff, and provide assistance for applicants to write their proposals. The counties and WSBs\n\n\n54\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                64
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "will be responsible for monitoring activities carried out under the program, including reporting\nprogress to WASREB.\n\n\n**B.** **Project Financing**\n\n8. The proposed terms of the IDA funds are as follows:\n\n\n    - _Component 1_ : Some 75 percent of the funds for Component 1 will be onlent on IDASUF terms, while 25 percent will be on-granted to cover the investments in sanitation.\n\n\n    - _Component 2_ : IDA and IDA-SUF funds will be on-granted.\n\n\n    - _Component 3_ : IDA-SUF funds will be on-lent on the selected IDA-SUF terms and\nwill include incentives for good performers.\n\n\n**C.** **Financial Management, Disbursements, and Procurement**\n\n_**Financial Management**_\n\n\n9. The World Bank’s FM team conducted an FM assessment of all the identified\nimplementing entities including Mombasa, Kwale, Taita Taveta, Kilifi, Wajir, and Garissa\nCounties and their WSPs; CWSB; WASREB; and the MWI. The objective of the FM assessment\nwas to determine whether the implementing entities’ financial arrangements (a) are capable of\ncorrectly and completely recording all transactions and balances relating to the project; (b)\nfacilitate the preparation of regular, accurate, reliable, and timely financial statements; (c)\nsafeguard the project’s entity assets; and (d) are subject to auditing arrangements acceptable to the\nBank. The assessment complied with the Financial Management Manual for World Bank-Financed\nInvestment Operations that became effective on March 1, 2010 (retrofitted on February 4, 2015).\nThe assessment covered the six FM elements of budgeting, funds flows, accounting, internal\ncontrols, financial reporting and auditing. The overall residual FM risk is therefore assessed as\nsubstantial mainly because of the complexity of the project and capacity challenges of some of the\nWSPs that will be implementing the project. Details of the assessment are included below.\n\n\n10. The MWI is assessed as having adequate FM capacity and has no outstanding audit reports\nwith the World Bank-financed KWSCRP that it is currently implementing. The audit report for\nKWSCRP for the financial year that ended on June 30, 2016, was qualified. The MWI is addressing\nthe issues that led to the qualified opinion. WASREB and the CWSB have been assessed as having\nadequate FM capacity. The CWSB is implementing the World Bank-financed WaSSIP. The audit\nreport for WaSSIP for the financial year that ended on June 30, 2016 was qualified. The CWSB is\naddressing the issues.\n\n\n11. The FM review of the counties and WSPs identified weaknesses in the FM arrangements\nincluding qualified audit reports and weak staff capacity. It is expected that the World Bankfinanced Kenya Devolution Support Program for Results will provide support to address the\nweaknesses. At the county level, the department of water will implement activities under the\nguidance of the county executive committee member for water. The county governments are legal\nentities and accounting units and will be accountable for the funds and compliance. The county\n\n\n55\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "FM assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.9360104203224182,
+                    "start": 146,
+                    "end": 148
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "implementing entities",
+                    "confidence": 0.8600749969482422,
+                    "start": 152,
+                    "end": 154
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "FM assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.9936747550964355,
+                    "start": 185,
+                    "end": 187
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.702458918094635,
+                    "start": 286,
+                    "end": 287
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "implementing entities",
+                    "confidence": 0.8098774552345276,
+                    "start": 152,
+                    "end": 154
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Financial Management Manual for World Bank-Financed\nInvestment Operations",
+                    "confidence": 0.9228737950325012,
+                    "start": 264,
+                    "end": 272
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.8055166006088257,
+                    "start": 286,
+                    "end": 287
+                },
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2010",
+                    "confidence": 0.5319333672523499,
+                    "start": 279,
+                    "end": 280
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audit report for\nKWSCRP",
+                    "confidence": 0.6624413728713989,
+                    "start": 382,
+                    "end": 386
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "audit report",
+                    "confidence": 0.70551997423172,
+                    "start": 382,
+                    "end": 384
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.505328893661499,
+                    "start": 494,
+                    "end": 495
+                },
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.6844866275787354,
+                    "start": 396,
+                    "end": 397
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "FM review of the counties and WSPs",
+                    "confidence": 0.5816217660903931,
+                    "start": 465,
+                    "end": 472
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.5856925845146179,
+                    "start": 494,
+                    "end": 495
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "qualified audit reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.5471828579902649,
+                    "start": 479,
+                    "end": 482
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.7649992108345032,
+                    "start": 494,
+                    "end": 495
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.9167966842651367,
+                    "start": 451,
+                    "end": 452
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                65
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "treasury will be responsible for the FM arrangements at the county level, including disbursement\nof funds to the WSPs (as appropriate), monitoring use of funds, and accounting for disbursed funds.\n\n\n12. **Overview.** The project will adopt the SoEs method of disbursement. The NT will open two\nDAs in U.S. dollars at the CBK: one for county activities (DA-A) and the other for all other\nactivities (DA-B) at the national level (for the MWI, WASREB, and WSB activities).\n\n\n(a) For county-level activities, funds will be disbursed to the counties, upon request by\nthe MWI, from the DAs to a segregated county special purpose account at the CBK\nthrough the exchequer account and county revenue fund. [26] From the county special\npurpose account, the funds will be disbursed to existing accounts for the WSPs to\ncover expenditures for water supply and sanitation. Expenditures for stormwater\nmanagement or for any other activities that counties implement directly (not through\nthe WSPs) will be covered by the county from the county special purpose account.\nThe counties will have the option of opening accounts for expenditures at the county\nlevel or incur expenditures directly from the special purpose account.\n\n\n(b) For national-level activities, funds will be disbursed from the DA-B to a project\naccount in Kenya shillings, which will be opened by the MWI at the CBK from which\npayment will be made for the MWI activities. For the WASREB and WSB activities,\nfunds will be disbursed from the DA-B to a project account in Kenya shillings, which\nwill be opened by WASREB or the respective WSB at a commercial bank acceptable\nto IDA from which payment will be made. The DAs will be replenished on the basis\nof a WA submitted to the World Bank by the ministry through the NT.\n\n\n_**Detailed FM Arrangements**_\n\n\n_Planning and Budgeting_\n\n\n13. Budgeting will follow the Government of Kenya budgeting procedures. The MWI will\nbudget for funds destined to the counties as conditional grants, transfers to the counties, and funds\nfor use at the national level. The county allocations should also be factored in the County\nAllocation Revenue Act to facilitate the transfer of allocation made to counties from the\nconsolidated account to the county revenue fund.\n\n\n14. Counties will budget for the project funds as conditional grants revenue from the national\ngovernment. This will constitute funds for the WSP and the respective county. The project budgets\nwill be included as part of the county budget by the respective county treasuries and approved by\nthe respective county assembly. Each county will be responsible for the preparation of its own\nannual work program and will incorporate an annual work program for the respective WSP.\n\n\n15. For the coastal WSPs that operate independently of the county, the internal budgetary\nprocess involves user departments submitting their proposed budgets for consolidation to the\n\n\n26 Each county will have one county special purpose account. The chief officer for water and the chief officer for\nfinance will be cosignatories for the account. The county special purpose account will avoid comingling of project\nfunds in the county operating accounts and minimize the risk of the project funds being used on non-project\nactivities at the county level.\n\n\n56\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                66
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "finance manager. The budget has to comply with tariffs set by WASREB, that is 30 percent for\nstaff, 30 percent for operations, 30 percent for investment, and 10 percent for administrative costs.\nThe previous year’s budget is used as a basis for departmental ceilings. The budget is discussed\nby heads of departments before being submitted to the finance committee for further deliberation\nand approval. The budget is then forwarded to the full board of the WSP for approval. The\napproved budget is shared with WASREB and the county. WASREB gives its final review and\namendments. The budget is then submitted to the county administration for information and at\ntimes for action where policy issues are concerned. For the northeastern counties, the WSPs are\nnot independent of the county. Their budget process is, therefore, different. The process starts with\na letter from the county chief officer for finance to the managing director of the WSP asking the\nWSP to start budgeting. The economic planning unit of the county provides the template for\nbudgeting. The managing director and accountant consolidate the budget from the various user\ndepartments. This is forwarded to the county budget committee and the process then follows the\ncounty budgetary procedures as laid down in the public FM regulations.\n\n\n16. The MWI will be the budget holder of funds under this program. It will request the NT to\nrelease funds to the counties for the use of the counties and WSPs. For Component 3, this will be\nbased on WASREB’s notification of whose proposal has been accepted for funding.\n\n\n_Accounting_\n\n\n17. At the national level, the MWI will maintain an adequate accounting system using the\nintegrated FM information system in addition to manual records for the project, such as cashbooks,\nbank reconciliations, and imprest registers. The MWI has a qualified and experienced head of\naccounting unit and a chief finance officer. However, due to the size and design of the project, the\nMWI will be required to deploy/designate a dedicated FM specialist for the project on the basis of\nterms of reference prepared by the national PCU and cleared by the World Bank. This FM\nspecialist will work closely with the county and the WSP deployed project accountants and offer\nfinancial support to them as required.\n\n\n18. Similarly, the counties, WSPs, CWSB, and WASREB will each maintain separate\ncashbooks for recording project expenditures incurred at their entities. All the counties are using\nthe integrated FM information system. WASREB is using SAP Business One. Most of the WSPs\nare using the QuickBooks information accounting system, which does not have inbuilt budgetary\ncontrols. In the coast region, under WaSSIP, the CWSB hired a consultant to develop enterprise\nresource planning specifications for all the WSPs in the region. However, the system was never\nimplemented. There is a need to revisit this under the WSDP so that the WSPs can have an\nintegrated system for all the important parts of their operations.\n\n\n19. The counties have qualified and experienced staff at the senior level. They will be required\nto designate qualified and experienced project accountants on the basis of terms of reference\nprepared by the national PCU in consultation with the counties and cleared by the World Bank.\nThe accountants at some of the counties assessed (especially the northeastern counties) have very\nweak capacity, and their WSPs are not independent of the county. As such, the Wajir and Garissa\nCounties will be required to deploy/designate a project accountant for the WSP and for the county\non the basis of terms of reference prepared by the national PCU in consultation with the counties\n\n\n57\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                67
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "and cleared by the World Bank. Both WASREB and the CWSB have qualified and experienced\naccountants.\n\n\n20. A comprehensive FM manual has been prepared for the project. The manual will be used\nto provide guidance in payment processing and financial reporting under the project. This is part\nof the PIM.\n\n\n_Internal control and internal audit_\n\n\n21. The MWI is currently implementing several World Bank-financed projects, including the\nKWSCRP, and maintains elaborate internal control arrangements in line with the Government of\nKenya financial regulations and procedures. These include approval and authorization of\npayments, segregation of duties, and imprest management. The MWI also has an internal audit\ndepartment that is effective and will ensure effective internal audit oversight of project activities.\nThe audit committees at all government ministries were, however, to be reconstituted to comply\nwith the Public Financial Management Act and regulations for ensuring that not all committee\nmembers were executive. This process has not been completed.\n\n\n22. At the county and WSP levels, the internal controls will require strengthening. A review\nof the counties’ audited reports revealed internal control weakness around cash management,\nallowances, and other expenditures (see external auditing). In addition, most of the WSPs have\nineffective internal audit units. Most of the assets in use by the WSPs are owned by the counties,\nand there is no complete fixed assets register.\n\n\n23. The project FM procedures manual will set out the detailed internal control procedures for\nthe project at the national and county levels.\n\n\n_**Disbursements**_\n\n\n24. **Banking arrangements.** The NT will be required to open two DAs denominated in Euros\nat the CBK, one for funds destined to the counties and the other for funds to be channeled through\nthe MWI at the national level. The two DAs will receive funds from both the IDA-SUF and regular\nIDA. The WSPs and counties will open project accounts denominated in Kenya shillings either in\nthe CBK or in commercial banks based in Kenya and acceptable to IDA.\n\n\n25. **Funds flow.** Funds destined to the water companies will flow from IDA to the DA at the\nCBK and into the county revenue fund (the MWI will trigger the movement of funds from the DA\nto the county revenue fund) using the Government exchequer requests systems to a Special\nPurpose Account at the CBK opened for ring-fencing water project funds. From the Special\nPurpose Account, funds will flow to the project accounts opened by the WSPs as well as to the\ncounties that will be implementing the project. Counties can also opt to spend their portion of funds\ndirectly from the special purpose account. Details of these accounts once opened and the\nsignatories are to be submitted to the World Bank to facilitate disbursements once the credit is\ndeclared effective. Funds for the MWI will flow from IDA to the DA at the CBK through the\nMWI’s development account and into the MWI project account.\n\n\n58\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                68
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Figure 3.1: Funds Flow Chart**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n26. **Disbursement.** The project will use the transaction-based SoE disbursement method. The\nWorld Bank will initially give an initial advance with a ceiling as set out in the Disbursement\nLetter. The initial advance will be determined by the initial three months’ work plan. Subsequently,\nthe implementing entity will submit its SoE, and the World Bank will process the electronic WAs\nand advance funds into the DA. Funds will then be transferred from the DA at the NT into the\nproject accounts of the various implementing entities as shown in the funds flow chart, and\npayments in relation to project eligible expenditures can be made from these accounts. The national\nPCU will submit the WAs to the World Bank through the NT. Replenishment of the DA will\n\n\n59\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                69
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "follow World Bank procedures. Requests for replenishment of the DA will be submitted on a\nmonthly basis or as required. The movements in the DA will be audited during the annual audit of\nthe project.\n\n27. The following tabled specify the categories of eligible expenditures that may be financed\nout of the proceeds of the Credits, the allocations of the amounts of the Credits to each category,\nand the percentage of expenditures to be financed for eligible expenditures in each category.\n\n**Table 3.2: IDA SUF allocations by category**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Category|Amount of the Credit<br>allocated (expressed in<br>EUR)|Percentage of<br>expenditures to be<br>Financed<br>(inclusive of Taxes)|\n|---|---|---|\n|(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, training and<br>operating costs for Component 1 (a) of the<br>project|112,800,000|100%|\n|(2) Goods, works, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, operating costs and<br>training for Component 1 (b) of the project|37,800,000|100%|\n|(3) Goods, works, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, training, operating<br>costs and recurrent costs for Component 2<br>of the project|59,204,000|100%|\n|(4) Goods, works, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, operating costs and<br>training for Component 3 (a) of the project|32,975,0000|100%|\n|(5) Goods, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, training and<br>operating costs for Component 3 (b) and<br>Component 4 of the project|4,700,000|100%|\n|(6) Front-end fee|621,000|Amount payable pursuant<br>to Section 2.03 of this<br>Agreement in accordance<br>with Section 3.01 (a) of<br>the General Conditions|\n|**TOTAL AMOUNT**|**248,100,000**||\n\n\n60\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                70
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Table 3.3: IDA allocations by category|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Category**|**Amount of the Credit**<br>**allocated (expressed in**<br>**EUR)**|**Percentage of**<br>**expenditures to be**<br>**Financed**<br>**(inclusive of Taxes)**|\n|(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services,<br>consultants’ services, training, operating<br>costs and recurrent costs for Component 2<br>of the project|27,400,000|100%|\n|**TOTAL AMOUNT**|27,400,000||\n\n\n28. Apart from the advance method of disbursement described above, reimbursements can be\nrequested from the Bank for eligible costs incurred by the implementing agency. The third method\nis direct payment that may be used for payments to contractors or service providers upon\nrecommendations of their satisfactory performance by the project authorized officials. Payments\nmay also be made to the commercial bank for expenditures against IDA special commitments\ncovering the commercial bank’s Letter of Credit. All these options are detailed in the World Bank\ndisbursement guidelines for projects, dated February 2017, and will also be stipulated in the\nDisbursement Letter.\n\n\n29. If ineligible expenditures are found to have been made from the designated and/or\noperating bank accounts, the implementing entities will be obligated to refund the same. If the DA\nremains inactive for more than six months, the implementing entities may be requested to refund\nto IDA the amounts advanced to the DA. All disbursements are subject to the conditions of the\nFinancing Agreements and the procedures defined in the Disbursement Letter.\n\n\n30. **Financial reporting.** The MWI will be responsible for the preparation of IFRs, which will\nbe submitted to the World Bank within 45 days after the end of the quarter. An FM specialist will\nbe deployed to be based at the national PCU on the basis of terms of reference developed by the\nnational PCU cleared by the World Bank. Each participating county will send a consolidated IFR\nof the county and its WSPs to the NT and MWI within 30 days of the end of the quarter to enable\nconsolidation at the MWI and submission to the World Bank within 45 days after the end of the\nquarter. The implementing entities will indicate in the IFR the amount received and the\ncorresponding utilization of the funds. They will have full responsibility for FM, including\nmanaging the project accounts, accounting, and financial reporting. The format and content of the\nIFRs was agreed with the implementing entities before negotiations. Templates for SoEs are\nattached to the Disbursement Letter. Reporting templates form counties to MWI is included as\nannexes in the PIM.\n\n\n31. IFRs will be submitted to the Bank not later than 45 days after the end of the calendar\nquarter. The main schedules for the IFR will include:\n\n\n(a) Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds (by category and by major\ncomponents/activity),\n\n\n(b) Statement of Cash Position for Project Funds,\n\n\n61\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                71
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "(c) Statements reconciling the balances on the project bank accounts (U.S. dollars and\nKenyan shillings) to the bank balances shown on the Statement of Sources and Uses\nof funds, and\n\n\n(d) SoE Withdrawal Schedules listing individual WAs relating to disbursements by the\nSoE-based method, by reference number, date, and amount.\n\n\n32. The MWI will also prepare the project consolidated annual financial statements within\nthree months after the end of the accounting year in accordance with accounting standards\nacceptable to the World Bank, either the International Public Sector Accounting Standards or\nInternational Financial Reporting Standards as appropriate. The financial statements will be\nsubmitted to the auditors within three months after the end of the financial year to facilitate the\nconduct of annual audits of the project. The financial year of the implementing entities runs from\nJuly 1 to June 30 of the following year.\n\n\n33. **External audit.** The OAG is mandated by the constitution to audit the use of all public\nfunds. As such, the OAG will audit the use of WSDP funds. The OAG audited the 2015/2016\nfinancial statements for World Bank-funded projects being implemented by the MWI. The auditor\nissued a qualified audit opinion on the financial statements for the KWSCRP as well as for\nWaSSIP. Both MWI and CWSB are addressing the audit qualification issues and the World Bank\nteam is following up.\n\n\n34. The OAG is also responsible for auditing the financial statements of the WSPs, WASREB,\nand of the counties.\n\n\n    - The last audit done for the counties was for financial year 2014/2015, where most of\nthe audit reports received either a disclaimer or an adverse opinion reflecting major\nfiduciary weaknesses. The Kenya Devolution Support Project is working with the\ncounties and the OAG to improve the quality of the reports and to deal with some of\nthe qualification issues that touch on capacity.\n\n\n    - Most WSPs received a qualified audit opinion on the financial statements for financial\nyear 2014/2015. Weaknesses included (a) impropriety of some travel expenditures,\n(b) payments to staff with expired contracts, (c) anomalies in payments for board\nsitting allowances, and (d) irregular cash payments among others.\n\n\n    - WASREB has received unqualified audit opinion since 2005 when it was established,\nsave for financial year 2015/2016 when the audit report was qualified for noncollection of penalties from WSBs.\n\n\n35. Each of these implementing entities will be required to prepare an action plan specifying\nhow they will address the issues raised in the audit report, especially in relation to internal controls.\nThis will be done during implementation.\n\n\n62\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Statement of Sources and Uses\nof funds",
+                    "confidence": 0.9848424196243286,
+                    "start": 29,
+                    "end": 36
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "SoE Withdrawal Schedules",
+                    "confidence": 0.7841673493385315,
+                    "start": 41,
+                    "end": 44
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "project consolidated annual financial statements",
+                    "confidence": 0.764643669128418,
+                    "start": 72,
+                    "end": 77
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audit reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.923102080821991,
+                    "start": 301,
+                    "end": 303
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Kenya",
+                    "confidence": 0.9675279855728149,
+                    "start": 317,
+                    "end": 318
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2014/2015",
+                    "confidence": 0.5297465324401855,
+                    "start": 365,
+                    "end": 368
+                },
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "WSPs",
+                    "confidence": 0.5341534614562988,
+                    "start": 352,
+                    "end": 353
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audit report",
+                    "confidence": 0.773276150226593,
+                    "start": 434,
+                    "end": 436
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audit report",
+                    "confidence": 0.9973182082176208,
+                    "start": 470,
+                    "end": 472
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": {
+                    "text": "report",
+                    "confidence": 0.7031000256538391,
+                    "start": 471,
+                    "end": 472
+                },
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                72
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Table 3.2: Audit Report and Timeline|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|**Audit Report**|**Due Date**|\n|The WSDP annual consolidated audited financial statement and<br>management letter for the project (including reconciliations of the DAs<br>with appropriate notes and disclosures and management letter<br>responses).|Within six months after the<br>end of each fiscal/financial<br>year|\n\n\n36. **Conclusion and supervision plan.** Some aspects of project’s FM arrangements require\nimprovements for the systems to be adequate to provide, with reasonable assurance, accurate and\ntimely information on the project’s status as required by IDA. The residual FM risk is assessed as\nsubstantial requiring World Bank supervision twice a year. FM supervision will be consistent with\na risk-based approach and will involve a collaborative approach with the task team, including\nloans/disbursement and procurement staff. This will cover all aspects of FM. Additional\nsupervision activities will include desk review of quarterly IFRs and internal audit reports, audited\nfinancial statements, and management letters as well as timely follow-up of issues arising and\nupdating the FM rating in the implementation status reports and the portfolio and risk management\nsystem.\n\n\n**Table 3.3: FM Action Plan**\n\n|Col1|Action|Responsibility|Due Date|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|1|Internal audit to audit the project activities|MWI|During<br>implementation|\n|3|Deploy/designate an FM specialist for the national<br>PCU|MWI/counties/WSPs|During<br>implementation|\n|4|Internal audit to draw an action plan on how to<br>improve their internal control systems based on the<br>audit qualifications issues of the last audited report|All|During<br>implementation|\n\n\n\n_**Procurement**_\n\n\n37. Procurement under the WSDP will be carried out in accordance with the World Bank’s\n‘Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and\nIDA Credits and Grants by World Bank Borrowers’ dated January 2011, revised July 2014, and\n‘Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and\nGrants by World Bank Borrowers’ dated January 2011, revised July 2014, and the provisions\nstipulated in the Financing Agreements. The various items under different expenditure categories\nare described below. For each contract to be financed by the credit and grants, the different\nprocurement methods or consultant selection methods, the need for prequalification, estimated\ncosts, prior-review requirements, and time frame are agreed between the Recipient and the World\nBank in the procurement plan. The procurement plan will be updated at least annually or as\nrequired to reflect the actual project implementation needs and improvements to institutional\ncapacity. The project will carry out implementation in accordance with the ‘Guidelines on\nPreventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA\nCredits and Grants’ (the Anticorruption Guidelines) dated October 15, 2006 and revised in January\n2011 and July 1, 2016 and the provisions stipulated in the Financing Agreements.\n\n\n63\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Audit Report",
+                    "confidence": 0.8700380325317383,
+                    "start": 6,
+                    "end": 8
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "IDA",
+                    "confidence": 0.8319462537765503,
+                    "start": 144,
+                    "end": 145
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "information on the project’s status",
+                    "confidence": 0.5014477968215942,
+                    "start": 134,
+                    "end": 141
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "quarterly IFRs",
+                    "confidence": 0.86078280210495,
+                    "start": 206,
+                    "end": 208
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "internal audit reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.7663105726242065,
+                    "start": 209,
+                    "end": 212
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audited\nfinancial statements",
+                    "confidence": 0.5809097290039062,
+                    "start": 213,
+                    "end": 216
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "audited report",
+                    "confidence": 0.8232858777046204,
+                    "start": 366,
+                    "end": 368
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": {
+                    "text": "audit qualifications issues",
+                    "confidence": 0.7877511978149414,
+                    "start": 360,
+                    "end": 363
+                },
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2014",
+                    "confidence": 0.7952941656112671,
+                    "start": 433,
+                    "end": 434
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "procurement plan",
+                    "confidence": 0.7937504649162292,
+                    "start": 531,
+                    "end": 533
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": {
+                    "text": "2016",
+                    "confidence": 0.5322489142417908,
+                    "start": 609,
+                    "end": 610
+                },
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                73
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "_Procurement implementation arrangement_\n\n\n(a) **Use of national procurement procedures.** All contracts other than those to be\nprocured on the basis of International Competitive Bidding (ICB) and consulting\nservices shall follow the procedures set out in the Public Procurement and Asset\nDisposal Act (PPADA) of 2015. The PPADA 2015 governs the purchase of works,\ngoods, and services using public resources by the Central Government entities, county\ngovernments, state corporations, education institutions, and other government\ninstitutions. Under the PPADA, the Public Procurement Oversight Authority has been\nestablished in addition to the Public Procurement Directorate in the NT. The PPADA\nsets out the rules and procedures of public procurement and provides a mechanism for\nthe enforcement of the law. Some provisions of the PPADA are not fully consistent\nwith the World Bank Procurement and Consultant Guidelines, and, therefore, these\nmay not be applied for the implementation of this project without modification. These\nprovisions and their respective modifications are as follows:\n\n\n(i) PPADA 89 (c). Instead, the tender submission date shall be set as to allow a\nperiod of at least 30 days from the later of the date of advertisement and the date\nof availability of the tender documents.\n\n\n(ii) PPADA 4(2) (c). Instead, the Recipient’s government-owned enterprises shall be\nallowed to participate in the tendering only if they can establish that they are\nlegally and financially autonomous, operate under commercial law, and are an\nindependent agency of the Recipient’s government.\n\n\n(iii) The Borrower shall use, or cause to be used, bidding documents and tender\ndocuments (containing, among others, draft contracts and conditions of contracts,\nincluding provisions on fraud and corruption, audit, and publication of award) in\nform and substance satisfactory to the Association.\n\n\n(iv) PPADA 89 (f). Instead, no domestic preference shall be used in the evaluation of\ntenders. Therefore, as a result of the non-application of PPADA 89 (f), contracts\nshall be awarded to qualified tenderers having submitted the lowest evaluated\nsubstantially responsive tender.\n\n\n(v) PPADA 108. Instead, the shopping procedure will apply for each low-value\ncontract except as otherwise previously agreed in writing by the Association.\n\n\n(vi) Regulation 47. Instead, the two envelope bid opening procedure shall not apply.\nUnder the National Competitive Bidding (NCB) contracts, the World Bank’s\nStandard Bidding Documents (SBDs) for goods and works shall be used with\nappropriate modifications.\n\n\n(b) **Procurement of goods** . Goods to be procured under the project will include office\nequipment and utility management, vehicles, bulk and consumer meters, supply of\npipes and fittings, laboratory equipment, and ICT goods (hardware and software). The\nprocurement will be carried out using the World Bank’s SBDs for all ICB and NCB\ncontracts.\n\n\n64\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                74
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "(c) **Procurement of works.** Works to be procured under the project include construction\nor rehabilitation of water and sewerage infrastructure, including water mains,\ndistribution lines, treatment plants, and small and minor rehabilitation works.\n\n\n(d) **Procurement of non-consulting services** . Non-consulting services envisaged under\nthe project include printing of training materials, renting/leasing of ICT services and\nworkshop venues, and leasing of office premises. The procurement will be carried out\nusing the World Bank’s SBDs for all ICB and NCB contracts. The type and budget\nfor such services will be defined and agreed upon between the Recipient and IDA\nbefore their inclusion in the updated annual procurement plans.\n\n\n38. **Use of framework agreements.** Framework contracting is permitted as an alternative to\nthe Shopping and NCB methods and may be used to implement procurements such as (a) goods\nthat can be procured off-the-shelf or are common use with standard specifications; (b) nonconsulting services that are of a simple and non-complex nature and those that may be required\nfrom time to time by the same agency or agencies of the Recipient; or (c) small-value contracts for\nworks under emergency operations. Such arrangements should not restrict foreign competition and\nshould be restricted to a maximum duration of three years. The nature and budget for such goods,\nincluding the circumstances and justification for its use, the particular approach and model to be\nadopted, the procedures for selection and award, and the terms and conditions of contracts, will be\ndefined and agreed upon between the government and the World Bank before their inclusion in\nthe updated procurement plan.\n\n\n39. **Selection of consultants** . Consulting services under the project include selection of firms\nand individuals for the provision of training services, supervision of infrastructure\nworks/rehabilitation, procurement ‘mobile team’, external financial audit, and TA services. All\nconsulting services will be procured using the World Bank’s Consultant Guidelines.\n\n\n40. **Capacity building, training programs, and workshops.** For all training activities, the\nproject team shall prepare and submit for World Bank approval annual training plans and budgets\nincluding the objectives of the training, the target participants, format of delivery, and the\nqualifications of the resource persons as well as the expected impact of the training before the\ntraining can be undertaken. In case the training is to be outsourced, the procurement of the trainer\nor of the training institution shall be integrated into the project procurement plan and agreed with\nthe World Bank. Similarly, the procurement of venues for workshops and training materials will\nbe done by comparing at least three quotations.\n\n\n41. **Operating costs.** Operating costs for the implementing agencies will include project\nimplementation-related expenditures such as in-country travel; office materials and supplies\n(stationary and other consumables, but not the purchase of equipment); office rentals and\nmaintenance; utilities (including electricity and water); communication costs (including telephone\nand Internet charges); equipment rental; vehicle operation, maintenance, and repair; and travel and\ntransport cost of the staff associated in the project implementation (including per diem for project\nsupervision activities in the field). These items will be procured using the procedures detailed in\nthe manual of procedures, which was reviewed and found acceptable to the World Bank. Operating\ncosts for Wajir and Garissa WSPs will include cost for electricity; gasoline and diesel; vehicle\n\n\n65\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                75
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "O&M and repair; recurrent telecommunication cost; and accommodation and per diem for\ntravelling staff.\n\n\n42. **PIM.** The procurement procedures and SBDs to be used for each procurement method, as\nwell as model contracts for works and goods procured are presented in the manual.\n\n\n43. **Assessment of the agency’s capacity to implement procurement.** Procurement activities\nunder the project will be carried out by the WASREB, WSBs, county governments, and WSPs,\nunder the overall coordination and management of the MWI. County governments will be\nresponsible for procurement activities below the World Bank Shopping threshold.\n\n\n44. The procurement team conducted a procurement capacity assessment of the following\nselected counties: Kiambu, Mombasa, and Garissa. The team also held discussions with Mombasa\nCWSB, MOWASCO, Thika Water Company, Ruiru-Juja Water Company, and Kiambu Water\nCompany. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure for implementing the project,\nfunctions, staff skills and experiences, adequacy for implementing the project, and the interaction\nbetween the project’s staff responsible for the procurement and the relevant government agencies.\n\n\n45. All counties and water services assessed have procurement units that have been established\naccording to the PPADA, and the procurement units highly depend on the inputs and expertise of\nthe staff of the technical departments in the administration of procurement processes and decision\nmaking. The assessment revealed that the water companies are operational and staffed and some\ntechnical staff are knowledgeable in national procurement procedures. However, there is a need\nfor strengthening and capacity building. Procurement in the counties is faced with some challenges\nidentified during the World Bank’s capacity assessment, and appropriate mitigation measures to\naddress these weaknesses are part of the PIM.\n\n\n46. The key issues and risks concerning procurement for the implementation of the project\nhave been identified and include (a) procurement staff having no experience in implementing\nWorld Bank-funded projects—staff experience is limited to the procurement of goods and works\nthrough NCB and Shopping procedures, with no experience in ICB procedures of selection of\nlarge-value consultancy contracts; (b) the record keeping being inadequate; (c) the qualification of\nprocurement staff being inadequate; (d) there being a lack of clear procedures and guidelines\nspelled out in manuals; (e) government officials likely to be involved in project procurement\nthrough tender and evaluation committees not being familiar with procurement procedures\naccording to World Bank guidelines and rules; (f) existing capacity in counties and water\ncompanies not being sustainable; and (g) although established under the same law, the counties\ndiffering in the manner they carry out procurement activities as well as the capacity of their staff.\n\n\n47. **The overall unmitigated risk for procurement is Substantial.** Proposed risk mitigation\nmeasures include provision of intensive customized procurement training to relevant staff in\ncounties and water companies on World Bank procurement procedures and contract management;\npreparation of a realistic procurement plan that could include detailed activity time lines tied to\ndisbursement and status of implementation/delivery particularly for monitoring purposes;\nestablishment and maintenance of a record keeping and filing system on a contract-by-contract\nbasis. Taking into account the mitigation measures, the residual risk for procurement is Moderate.\n\n\n66\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                76
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "48. To address the above risks areas, the following actions are included in the project design:\n\n\n    - Intensive capacity building for procurement staff and city engineers including staff\ninvolved in the procurement decision-making process and members of evaluation\ncommittees and customized and hands-on training on procurement focusing on\nprocurement planning, preparation of bidding documents, evaluation of bids or\nproposals, and procurement documents filing.\n\n\n    - Preparation of SBDs for NCB procurement under World Bank Procurement\nGuidelines that incorporate a list of identified exceptions to the Public Procurement\nCode that take account of the World Bank’s fraud, anticorruption, and other\nprocurement provisions.\n\n\n    - Appointment of two additional, proficient and experienced procurement specialists to\nsupport and enhance the capacity of city governments through a ‘mobile team’ funded\nunder the project; the consultants would have specific performance criteria in their\nterms of reference to measure the effective knowledge transfer to staff within counties\nand other implementing entities when necessary. However, the overall responsibility\nfor procurement performance lies with each participating county.\n\n\n    - Capacity appraisal of all participating counties during the first year of the project.\nThese appraisals will help identify core gaps and specific weaknesses for each\nparticipating council in procurement and suitable training to be provided.\n\n\n    - Setting up of adequate records management for project documents, including adequate\nspaces and office furniture for filing.\n\n\n    - Exposure of the local government staff to best practices elsewhere and/or other\ncounties.\n\n\n49. The major actions planned to ensure the project’s smooth implementation, their related\nresponsible unit, and proposed time frame are captured in Table 3.4.\n\n\n**Table 3.4: Procurement Action Plan**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Action|Timeframe|Responsibility|\n|---|---|---|\n|Intensive capacity building for procurement staff and engineers<br>including staff involved in the procurement decision-making<br>process and members of evaluation committees.|To commence before<br>effectiveness with<br>completion no later<br>than six months after<br>effectiveness|Procurement<br>consultants/MWI|\n|Preparation of standard bidding documents for NCB procurement<br>under World Bank Procurement Guidelines.|For project<br>implementation||\n|Appointment of two additional proficient and experienced<br>procurement specialists to support and enhance the capacity of<br>county governments and their WSPs through a “mobile team”|To commence before<br>effectiveness with<br>completion no later<br>than three months<br>after effectiveness|MWI|\n|Conduct the project launch workshop dedicated to the specific<br>procurement and the used of the simplified procurement manual|To commence before<br>effectiveness with|MWI|\n\n\n67\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                77
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Action|Timeframe|Responsibility|\n|---|---|---|\n||completion no later<br>than three months<br>after effectiveness||\n|Capacity appraisal of all county governments and their WSPs<br>during the first year of the project|One year after project<br>implementation|MWI|\n|Set up adequate records management for projects’ documents|During project<br>implementation|All entities|\n|Exposure of the staff of county governments and their WSPs to<br>best practices|During project<br>implementation|County<br>governments|\n\n\n50. **Procurement plan** . The Recipient developed a simplified procurement plan indicating\nprocurements to be carried out over the first 18 months of the project. The procurement plan\nconsists of the procurement methods or consultant selection methods, the need for prequalification, estimated costs, and prior-review requirements and was agreed between the\nRecipient and the World Bank at negotiations. The procurement plan will be updated at least\nannually, or more frequently as required, to reflect the actual project implementation needs and\nimprovements in institutional capacity.\n\n\n51. **Prior-review thresholds.** The procurement plan shall set forth those contracts which shall\nbe subject to the World Bank’s prior review. All other contracts shall be subject to post review by\nthe World Bank. However, relevant contracts below prior-review thresholds listed below that are\ndeemed complex and/or have significant risk levels will be prior reviewed. Such contracts will\nalso be identified in the procurement plan. A summary of prior-review and procurement method\nthresholds for the project are indicated in Table 3.5. All terms of reference for consultants’\nservices, regardless of contract value, shall also be subject to the World Bank’s prior review.\n\n\n**Table 3.5: Thresholds for Procurement Methods**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Expenditure<br>Category|Contract Value<br>(Threshold) (US$,<br>thousands)|Procurement Method|Contract Subject to Prior<br>Review (US$, thousands)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**1. Works**|10,000 or more|ICB|All|\n|**1. Works**|Below 10,000|NCB|First contract per entity|\n|**1. Works**|Below or equal to 200|Shopping|None unless contract specified<br>in the Procurement Plan|\n|**1. Works**|No threshold|Direct Contracting|All|\n|**2. Goods**|1,000 or more|ICB|All|\n|**2. Goods**|Below 1,000|NCB|First contract per entity|\n|**2. Goods**|Below or equal to 100|Shopping|None unless contract specified<br>in the Procurement Plan|\n|**2. Goods**|No threshold|Direct Contracting|All|\n|**3. Consultancy**|Firms|Quality and Cost-Based<br>Selection, Least Cost Selection,<br>Selection Based on Fixed<br>Budget, Quality-Based Selection|All contracts of 200 and more|\n|**3. Consultancy**|Individual|Selection of Individual<br>Consultants (at least 3<br>curriculum vitae)|All contracts of 100 and more|\n\n\n68\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                78
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Expenditure<br>Category|Contract Value<br>(Threshold) (US$,<br>thousands)|Procurement Method|Contract Subject to Prior<br>Review (US$, thousands)|\n|---|---|---|---|\n||No threshold|Single Source|All|\n\n\n_Note:_ All terms of reference for consulting services will be subject to IDA’s prior review.\n\n\n52. **Frequency of procurement supervision.** In addition to the prior-review supervision to be\ncarried out from World Bank offices, the capacity assessment of the implementing entities has\nrecommended (a) supervision missions every six months to visit the field; (b) monitoring of\nimplementation progress and identification of any emerging risks; (c) helping the Government\nmitigate risks; and (d) carrying out post review of procurement actions undertaken. Missions in\nthe first 18 months shall include a World Bank procurement specialist or a specialized consultant.\n\n\n**Environmental and Social (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n53. **The project is assigned an Environmental Category B on the assumption that**\n**subprojects may result in potential adverse environmental and social impacts that are**\n**reversible and temporary in nature and scope and can be easily and cost-effectively**\n**mitigated.** It is also assumed that impacts may be site-specific and may not affect an area broader\nthan the sites or facilities of the physical works. The project triggers safeguards policies on\nEnvironmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01), Natural Habitat (OP/BP 4.04), Physical Cultural\nResources (OP/BP 4.11), Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12), Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37),\nInternational Waterways (OP/BP 7.50), and Indigenous Peoples (known as VMGs in Kenya)\n(OP/BP 4.10). The potential subprojects include rehabilitation, expansion, and development of\nwater supply systems; rehabilitation of a wastewater treatment plant; and construction of sanitation\nand sewerage infrastructure.\n\n\n54. **The client has prepared, in a participatory and consultative manner, an ESMF.** This\nestablishes a process of environmental and social screening and permits the institutions in charge\nof the implementation of the projects to identify, assess, and mitigate the environmental and social\nimpacts of subproject investments. The ESMF also determines the institutional measures to be\ntaken during implementation, including capacity-building activities to ensure that environmental\nand social impacts are identified and assessed and that mitigation measures are incorporated in the\ndesigns and development of the specific subprojects.\n\n\n55. **The client has also prepared an RPF to clarify the principles and legal and**\n**institutional procedures for resettlement and rehabilitation and design criteria to be applied**\n**to investments.** The RPF provides overall guidelines and procedures on how the subprojects will\navoid, minimize, manage, or mitigate all these project-related displacement risks.\n\n\n56. **The majority of project beneficiaries in Wajir and Garissa Counties are ethnic**\n**Somalis who qualify as VMGs, and, therefore, the criteria for OP 4.10 is met.** According to\nthe requirements of the policy, when indigenous peoples are the sole or the overwhelming majority\nof direct project beneficiaries, it is not required to prepare an IPP. However, SAs need to be\nprepared, consulted upon, and disclosed. The elements of an IPP should be included in the overall\nproject design. The client has undertaken SAs for Wajir and Garissa Counties, to ensure the project\nbenefits VMGs of these counties and that any potential adverse effects on vulnerable and\nmarginalized people are averted.\n\n\n69\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                79
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "57. **Some of the key findings from the SAs are that:**\n\n\n    - The nomadic ethnic Somali pastoralists (indigenous peoples) constitute the\noverwhelming majority of direct project beneficiaries. They are mainly camel,\nlivestock, and goat herders and their reliance on natural resources renders them\nvulnerable to the devastating impacts of frequent droughts that afflict the region.\n\n\n    - School attendance in both counties is well below the national average. The main\nreasons given for children not attending school included fetching water and grazing\nlivestock. It was noted that the proposed project can add value to school attendance\nby availing water in much closer proximity.\n\n\n    - A majority of the respondents accessed water for domestic use from shallow wells.\nThese were usually hand-dug and manually operated and were widely contaminated\nwith human waste because of the open defecation among the vulnerable and\nmarginalized community members. The proposed project can make a difference by\navailing potable water in water kiosks around the _bulas_ in vulnerable and marginalized\ncommunities.\n\n\n    - Water was difficult to access, expensive, and of poor quality. This points to a\ncollapsed water supply system that seems to have fallen beyond the reach of the\nmajority of the vulnerable and marginalized community members. The proposed\nproject will make water affordable, clean, and distributed closer to the homes of\nvulnerable and marginalized community members.\n\n\n    - The majority of the residents dispose of their human waste in the open fields and\nbushes or through bucket toilets. These are emptied in the open fields or in the bushes.\nTherefore, the proposed project will respond to these factors by offering small-scale\nwater treatment works around major water points or training people to treat their water\nat source if they are off the supply grid.\n\n\n    - Many respondents reported that members of their households had suffered from a\nwaterborne disease. This confirms data indicating widespread prevalence of\nwaterborne diseases in the project area borne out of the human waste disposal\npractices among the vulnerable and marginalized community members.\n\n\n    - Women were more vulnerable within the communities because they are responsible\nfor household water supply and sanitation. The project will reduce the distances that\nwomen have to travel in search of water for domestic use. The reduction of distances\nwill have a positive impact on household incomes as women can engage in\neconomically productive activities. In addition, school attendance for girls, who are\nusually tied up with domestic chores, may increase.\n\n\n    - While the counties do attract a large number of nongovernmental organizations, most\nof them are involved more in providing relief assistance and less in water supply and\nsanitation. The health and water and sanitation sectors are mainly supported by county\ngovernments.\n\n\n70\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                80
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "58. **Some key recommendations of the SAs are:**\n\n\n    - Inclusion of VMGs, in culturally appropriate and responsive methods and through\nexisting leadership structures and community-based organizations, in project\nconsultations, design, and implementation processes;\n\n\n    - Building of the capacity and competence of VMGs to enable effective participation in\nwater governance;\n\n\n    - Support for the involvement of female VMGs in leadership and decision making\nwithin water user associations;\n\n\n    - Provision of water for small-scale farming and other livelihood promoting uses should\nbe considered and included in the water design;\n\n\n    - Support for social welfare during project design stage in the form of assistance to local\nhealth facilities, schools, and agricultural enterprises and subsidized provision of\nwater and sanitation facilities to VMGs; and\n\n\n    - Provision of watering points for livestock around water sources and along water\npipelines.\n\n\n59. **The recommendations of the SAs will be availed by the consultants undertaking**\n**subproject designs in both the Wajir and Dadaab host communities.** This will ensure that the\nissues of importance to VMGs are taken into account in the technical studies and overall project\ndesign.\n\n\n60. **For the locations/sites of subprojects that have been already identified or carried over**\n**from the ongoing WaSSIP and have been scheduled for immediate urgent works, specific**\n**safeguard instruments have been prepared for these locations as follows:**\n\n\n    - **Rehabilitation and expansion of the Mombasa Lot 2B pipelines.** This subproject\nintends to increase the water supply to Mombasa County through the expansion and\nrehabilitation of water pipelines within Mombasa west mainland, Mombasa south\nmainland, Mombasa north mainland and Mombasa island within Mombasa County.\nAn update of the RAP has been prepared, consulted upon, and disclosed in-country\nand in the World Bank’s external website in February 2017. Because the scope and\nnature of the subproject have not been modified nor realignment/rerouting has\noccurred since the original ESIA was prepared, there will be no further work needed\non the ESIA.\n\n\n    - **Improving the existing stormwater outlets, outfalls, and combined sewer**\n**overflows in Mombasa island.** The subproject’s objective is to reduce pollution of\nthe Indian Ocean, by the removal of floatables and grit from seven stormwater outlets,\none outfall at Kizingo wastewater treatment plant, and four combined sewer overflows\nin Mombasa island. The improvements will involve the construction of grit removal\nchambers and coarse and fine screens to reduce the amount of floatables and grits\n\n\n71\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                81
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "making its ways to the Indian Ocean. An ESIA and an RAP were prepared, consulted\nupon, and disclosed in-country and in the World Bank’s external website in February\n2017.\n\n\n    - **Kipevu wastewater treatment plant immediate works and extension.** The\nsubproject includes the rehabilitation of the existing wastewater treatment plant and\nrehabilitation of existing pumping stations, targeted trunk sewers, and main secondary\nsewers. The wastewater system is located in Mombasa west mainland service area.\nAn ESIA and an RAP have been prepared, consulted upon, and disclosed in-country\nand in the World Bank external website in February 2017.\n\n\n    - **Additional rehabilitation of the Baricho well field.** An ESIA was already prepared\nfor the extension of the Baricho well field under the ongoing WaSSIP for the full\ncapacity of the well field. The rehabilitation will not go beyond the capacity\nestablished in the existing ESIA; therefore, no update of the ESIA is foreseen. An\nRAP was done under WaSSIP, and no new RAP is required because the rehabilitation\nis on the existing guarded well field. All these safeguards documents are within the\nvalidity period. These five documents were consulted upon and disclosed in-country\nand on the World Bank’s external website in February 2017.\n\n\n61. **Capacity to manage safeguards issues will be built at all the agencies that will be**\n**implementing the project.** The project will be implemented at the county level through WSBs\nand WSPs that have been overseeing and implementing various donor-supported projects. A rapid\nassessment of the capacity of entities such as the MWI and selected WSBs and WSPs revealed\nacceptable and satisfactory levels of technical know-how within these entities for planning, design,\nand implementation of water and sanitation investments. Also, capacity to process and oversee the\npreparation of safeguard reports at the MWI, WSBs, and most of the WSPs has been found to be\ngood, although needing enhancement, particularly in ensuring implementation of safeguard\ninstruments and compliance with relevant national regulations and requirements such as the\nEnvironmental and Management Coordination Act (No. 8 of 1999, as amended in 2015). The\ncapacity challenges arise from limited filled positions for environmental and social safeguard\nexperts at the implementing agencies and the limited experience of those already in position to\nsatisfactorily identify risks and implement remediation measures. The MWI has committed to\nappoint or hire experienced environmental and social safeguard officers to support implementation\nof the safeguard instruments and to monitor and enforce compliance. In addition, the WSPs will\nappoint or recruit safeguard experts at the county level to support the implementation of the project.\nThe project will prepare a safeguard capacity-building plan to train and expose old and new\nsafeguard officers on various aspects of environmental and social sustainability, including national\nregulations and requirements, World Bank Operational Policies on safeguards, preparation and\nimplementation of safeguard instruments, and compliance monitoring and reporting. This plan will\nbe financed through the project.\n\n\n62. Public consultations of the RPF and ESMF were held in January 2017 with stakeholders\nfrom the six WSDP focus counties: Wajir, Garissa, Kwale, Mombasa, Kilifi, and Taita Taveta to\ndiscuss the contents of this RPF. In addition, the client conducted consultations in December 2016\non the site-specific safeguards instruments through public meetings and individual interviews with\nlocal officials. The results of the consultations are captured in the safeguards instruments. Overall,\n\n\n72\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                82
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "community members were supportive of the project and indicated that they hoped to see the\ncompletion of the works on time. Key stakeholders expressed concerns about the potential of\npolitical interference, not having a consultation process during implementation, the need to\nconduct water sources studies (that is, the Merti aquifer), odor issues at wastewater facilities, and\nclarification on compensation mechanisms, among others. Stakeholder feedback gathered through\nthese workshops informed the final version of the SA and ESMF.\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Table 3.6: Safeguard Policies Triggered|\n|---|---|\n|**Safeguard**<br>**Policies**|**Description**|\n|Environmental<br>Assessment<br>(OP/BP 4.01)|The investment will finance the construction and rehabilitation of water distribution and<br>sanitation systems, involving, among others, the rehabilitation and construction of wastewater<br>treatment plants, sewerage systems, and septic sludge treatment facilities in urban areas;<br>extension of parts of the bulk water system that serves more than one county and the operation<br>of the system; and an increase in access to water and sanitation services in Wajir town and in<br>host communities near the Dadaab refugee camp in Garissa County. These civil works will lead<br>to environmental risks and social impacts, including health and safety concerns. Therefore, the<br>Environmental Assessment assigned to this project is Category B. Because the scope and<br>nature of most works as well as their specific locations are unknown at this stage of project<br>preparation, the framework approach has been proposed, and the client has prepared an ESMF<br>and an RPF. In addition, the client prepared ESIAs for subprojects that have sites/locations<br>identified and detailed designs. The project will follow the World Bank Environmental, Health,<br>and Safety Guidelines for Water and Sanitation.<br>The ESMF and site-specific ESIAs have been publicly consulted upon and disclosed in-country<br>and on the World Bank’s external website.|\n|Natural<br>Habitats<br>(OP/BP 4.04)|While no significant negative impacts on natural habitats, including mangroves, are anticipated<br>by project works, this policy is triggered given the types of works and the potential locations<br>and associated environmental conditions. Depending on the subprojects and potential negative<br>impacts to the natural habitats (flora and fauna), these subprojects will require special studies to<br>protect or preserve the species identified at risk of being affected. If a subproject can cause<br>irreversible damages, it will be excluded.|\n\n\n73\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                83
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Safeguard<br>Policies|Description|\n|---|---|\n|Physical<br>Cultural<br>Resources<br>(OP/BP 4.09)|The policy is triggered due to the possibility of chance finding of physical cultural resources<br>(PCR) during construction. Any potential chance finds will be addressed by incorporating<br>reporting and handling procedures as part of site-specific ESIA and dealt with in the context of<br>the ESMF.<br>The project will screen for PCR and chance finds and will include appropriate plans in the<br>ESIAs, and measures will be put in place during the preparation and implementation of the<br>ESIAs so as to protect PCR. The ESIA that will be prepared for such projects will include a<br>PCR management plan that includes (a) measures to avoid or mitigate adverse impacts on PCR;<br>(b) provisions for managing chance finds; (c) any necessary measures for strengthening<br>institutional capacity for the management of PCR; and (d) a monitoring system to track<br>progress of these activities.<br>Mombasa island is home to Mombasa old town, which is a heritage site recognized by United<br>Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Existing pump stations<br>to be improved under the stormwater outfall subproject are located in Mombasa old town.<br>Although the improvements will not affect any cultural site, because the site is located within<br>the old town, care must be taken to ensure construction methods do not affect cultural sites<br>within the area.<br>Adequate procedures are included in the site-specific ESIAs. In addition, all works and<br>activities in the old town will be in line with any existing UNESCO Management Plan as<br>coordinated with the UNESCO Secretariat. These provisions will be included in works bidding<br>documents.|\n|Involuntary<br>Resettlement<br>(OP/BP 4.12)|It is assumed that the proposed civil works would result in land take and displacement (both<br>economic and physical) of people. The client has prepared an RPF, which has been publicly<br>consulted upon and disclosed in-country and on the World Bank’s external website.<br> <br>The client also prepared and disclosed specific RAPs for the immediate works indicated above.<br>The RAPs indicate that about 341 project affected persons (PAPs) for Mombasa Lot 2B<br>subproject, 116 PAP for the Mombasa outlet subproject and 93 PAP for the Kipevu wastewater<br>treatment plant will be affected by the proposed works. The RAPs include specific<br>recommendations and guidelines to mitigate the impacts on the affected population.|\n\n\n74\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                84
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Safeguard<br>Policies|Description|\n|---|---|\n|Indigenous<br>Peoples<br>(OP/BP 4.10)|This is triggered because indigenous peoples have been identified in Wajir and Garissa<br>Counties. Given that the overwhelming majority of the project beneficiaries in Wajir and<br>Garissa Counties are ethnic Somalis, the client has prepared SA reports, and the findings and<br>recommendations will be incorporated into the detailed designs and technical studies, which<br>will ensure that project benefits accrue to these groups as well. Some of the SA<br>recommendations include (a) building the capacity and competence of VMGs to enable<br>effective participation in water governance being part of the TA provided and also being part of<br>the consultations about the proposed technical interventions; (b) support for the involvement of<br>female VMGs in leadership and decision making within water user associations being part of<br>the TA provided to strengthen the water user associations; (c) provision of water for small-<br>scale farming and other livelihood promoting uses being considered and included in the water<br>design; and (d) provision of watering points for livestock around water sources and along water<br>pipelines. The SA reports have been publicly consulted upon and disclosed.<br>Component 1 of the project is not expected to affect or encounter people considered as<br>VMG/indigenous peoples as it is entirely in urban areas, cities, or towns - Mombasa (Mombasa<br>County), Kilifi, Malindi, Mariakani (Kilifi County), Kwale, Ukunda (Kwale County), and Voi<br>and Taveta (Taita Taveta County) of the coast.<br>Component 3 will only work in a few select larger towns that have water utilities regulated<br>under the WASREB. None of these urban areas/towns is considered to have VMGs/indigenous<br>peoples.|\n|Safety of Dams<br>(OP/BP 4.37)|The project will finance a transmission water main that will take drinking water from the<br>Mwache Dam, which is under design. The construction will be financed through the World<br>Bank-financed CRWSCRP. Thus, the WSDP will rely on the performance (storage and<br>operation) of a potential dam under construction. The relevant safeguard reports on the<br>Mwache Dam have been prepared by the client, consulted upon, and disclosed in-country and<br>on the World Bank’s external website. Thus, conditions in OP/BP 4.37 paragraphs 8–9 have<br>been met. Nonetheless, before commencement of any civil works relating to the transmission<br>water main, the client will arrange for one or more dam specialists to (a) inspect and evaluate<br>the safety status of the dam under construction (Mwache Dam); (b) review and evaluate the<br>owner’s O&M procedures; and (c) provide a written report of findings and recommendations<br>for any remedial work or safety-related measures necessary to upgrade the dam under<br>construction (Mwache Dam) to an acceptable standard of safety.|\n|Projects on<br>International<br>Waterways<br>(OP/BP 7.50)|This policy is triggered because parts of the project will be implemented in the area of the<br>Merti aquifer, which extends from Kenya into Somalia.<br>On December 12, 2016, the Government of Kenya delivered a notification letter regarding the<br>project to the Government of Somalia through the Embassy of Somalia in Nairobi. Because of<br>an error in the notification letter, the Government of Kenya sent a revised letter to the Embassy<br>of Somalia and to Somalia’s Ministry of Water Resources on February 17 with a response date<br>of March 6, 2017. No response has been received. The combined abstraction from the Merti<br>aquifer is currently at 21,000 cubic meters per day. When the proposed water supply<br>investments in Wajir town and Dadaab host communities are implemented there would be an<br>increase in water abstraction of approximately 4,000 cubic meters per day, representing a 19<br>percent increment. Planned investments and aquifer abstraction decisions will be informed by<br>recommendations of several ongoing technical studies, including the Merti aquifer assessment<br>and management plan and a specific environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) for<br>the proposed activities. The studies will be made public and consultations will be conducted to<br>get feedback from all stakeholders.<br>The Regional Vice President cleared a memo summarizing the results of Riparian Notification<br>under OP 7.50 on March 17, 2017.|\n\n\n75\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "SA reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.9848520159721375,
+                    "start": 79,
+                    "end": 81
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "client",
+                    "confidence": 0.7521242499351501,
+                    "start": 76,
+                    "end": 77
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "ethnic Somalis",
+                    "confidence": 0.7413657307624817,
+                    "start": 72,
+                    "end": 74
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "TA",
+                    "confidence": 0.8459958434104919,
+                    "start": 150,
+                    "end": 151
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "VMGs",
+                    "confidence": 0.8246808052062988,
+                    "start": 135,
+                    "end": 136
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "SA reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.955048680305481,
+                    "start": 259,
+                    "end": 261
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "VMG/indigenous peoples",
+                    "confidence": 0.6328926086425781,
+                    "start": 290,
+                    "end": 294
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "safeguard reports",
+                    "confidence": 0.9288330674171448,
+                    "start": 478,
+                    "end": 480
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "client",
+                    "confidence": 0.7120646834373474,
+                    "start": 492,
+                    "end": 493
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "Mwache Dam",
+                    "confidence": 0.8904128670692444,
+                    "start": 430,
+                    "end": 432
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "written report of findings and recommendations",
+                    "confidence": 0.667905867099762,
+                    "start": 609,
+                    "end": 615
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "notification letter",
+                    "confidence": 0.5861798524856567,
+                    "start": 715,
+                    "end": 717
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Merti aquifer assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.9941746592521667,
+                    "start": 886,
+                    "end": 889
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "environmental and social impact assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.9202093482017517,
+                    "start": 898,
+                    "end": 903
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": {
+                    "text": "ESIA",
+                    "confidence": 0.8457713723182678,
+                    "start": 904,
+                    "end": 905
+                },
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Riparian Notification",
+                    "confidence": 0.8406481742858887,
+                    "start": 949,
+                    "end": 951
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": {
+                    "text": "Regional Vice President",
+                    "confidence": 0.6303384304046631,
+                    "start": 939,
+                    "end": 942
+                },
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                85
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n63. **Objectives and design.** The objective of the M&E system is to generate timely and\nrelevant feedback on the project’s implementation progress and achievement of expected outcomes\nto enable the Government and World Bank teams to address issues as quickly as possible once\nthey arise. The M&E specialists responsible for preparing the project’s quarterly progress reports\nwill be part of the WSDP PCU at the MWI. They will be responsible for establishing the M&E\nsystem and training and backstopping M&E specialists at the level of the implementing agencies.\nThey will also prepare quarterly WSDP progress reports, based on the information from the M&E\nspecialists at the implementing agencies, and submit this to the World Bank within 45 days of the\nend of the quarter. They will also coordinate the participation of the implementing agencies in a\nmidterm review scheduled for 2019.\n\n\n64. **The main responsibility for monitoring and reporting will be with the implementing**\n**agencies.** The M&E specialists at the implementing agencies will be responsible for monitoring\nand collecting information on implementation progress and contribution of specific activities to\nthe project’s intermediate results and PDO-level outcomes. They will submit quarterly progress\nreports to the M&E specialist at the MWI.\n\n\n65. **Data generation.** The data to track many of the key performance indicators will come from\nnational sources, the implementing agencies, and project-specific data collection efforts. For\nexample, information on the number of people benefiting from the project will come from the\nnational census (most recently carried out in 2009) and projections of the National Bureau of\nStatistics of expected population growth. Data on operational performance of the WSPs will come\nfrom the WSPs themselves, with oversight and confirmation by WASREB. Information on the\ncreation of project-financed infrastructure will come from reports of the independent supervision\nconsultants.\n\n\n66. **Reporting.** The MWI PCU is responsible for submitting quarterly project progress reports\nto the World Bank and to the relevant government officials at the MWI within six weeks of the\nend of each quarter. The Government and World Bank teams will discuss the findings of reports\nduring each implementation support mission and agree on actions to address issues raised in the\nreports.\n\n\n67. **Beneficiary assessment.** Within six months of the closing of the project, the MWI PCU\nwill recruit an independent firm to conduct a beneficiary assessment. The objective of the\nbeneficiary assessment will be to produce information on the benefits of the infrastructure\ninvestments and capacity-building support provided under the project. The assessment will review\nissues such as the relevance of the infrastructure to people living and working in the places that\nbenefited from the investments, the number of people benefiting (disaggregated by gender and\nvulnerable people), and the performance of the relevant agencies in operating and maintaining the\ninfrastructure. The assessment will also explore the quality and relevance of the studies in\ninforming the design of the overall project interventions and the extent to which the capacitybuilding support achieved its objectives.\n\n\n68. **Capacity building for M&E.** As mentioned above, most of the information on project\nimplementation performance and progress toward results will come from the WSPs. Although\n\n\n76\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "M&E system",
+                    "confidence": 0.9008419513702393,
+                    "start": 21,
+                    "end": 25
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": {
+                    "text": "M&E specialists",
+                    "confidence": 0.8583219647407532,
+                    "start": 64,
+                    "end": 68
+                },
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "national census",
+                    "confidence": 0.974531352519989,
+                    "start": 303,
+                    "end": 305
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": {
+                    "text": "national",
+                    "confidence": 0.5868582725524902,
+                    "start": 273,
+                    "end": 274
+                },
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": {
+                    "text": "2009",
+                    "confidence": 0.9877859354019165,
+                    "start": 311,
+                    "end": 312
+                },
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Beneficiary assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.5131149291992188,
+                    "start": 439,
+                    "end": 441
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "beneficiary assessment",
+                    "confidence": 0.938959538936615,
+                    "start": 465,
+                    "end": 467
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "studies",
+                    "confidence": 0.6069511771202087,
+                    "start": 559,
+                    "end": 560
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "vague",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "WSPs",
+                    "confidence": 0.8786325454711914,
+                    "start": 614,
+                    "end": 615
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "supporting"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                86
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "some of the WSPs have benefited from support under WaSSIP for strengthening capacity for\nM&E, many have not, and overall capacity for M&E is weak. The project will provide support to\nstrengthen the capacity of the WSPs benefiting from the project. Specifically, the project will\nfinance consultants who will work with the WSPs to prepare a detailed M&E and reporting system\nplan, provide on-the job and other training for M&E specialists (at both the implementing agency\nlevels and the MWI PCU level), and provide other capacity support required to establish and\noperate an effective M&E system. The project will also finance follow-on training and workshops\nto enable M&E specialists to ensure that normal staff turnover does not disrupt the M&E effort.\n\n\n**Role of Partners**\n\n\n69. The AFD will finance the bulk water infrastructure related to Mwache Dam (WTP,\npumping stations, reservoirs, and one of the three clean water transmission mains). In addition, the\nAFD will finance the water supply network rehabilitation and extension in Likoni (which is part\nof Mombasa). The AFD Board approved the project in October 2016. Under the proposed WSDP,\nthe World Bank will finance the water supply and sanitation systems in the coastal cities (without\nLikoni) and two transmission mains related to Mwache Dam.\n\n\n**Citizen Engagement**\n\n\n70. A gender-disaggregated analysis and consultations on water and sanitation issues will be\nundertaken in the targeted counties in the underserved northeastern region as part of understanding\nhow the project can best provide access to improved services. The analysis will identify actions to\naddress the issues faced by men and women in accessing water and sanitation services, with\nparticular attention to gaps between men and women in decision making. The design of sanitation\nfacilities to be supported under the project in Wajir and Garissa will be informed by the findings\nof the analysis and consultations.\n\n\n71. The project will support the WSPs to prepare and implement gender action plans.\n\n\n72. The project will review the capacity of the counties in the coastal regions and their WSPs\nto efficiently handle complaints. This will be done against the framework of the requirements for\n‘MajiVoice’, the system piloted under WASSIP, which has shown its potential to enable oversight\non complaint handling by the utility management.\n\n\n**Climate Mitigation and Adaption Co-benefits**\n\n\n73. While a full climate mitigation and adaption co-benefits assessment, including greenhouse\ngases, can only be carried out during project implementation when the vast majority of investments\nhave been designed, a qualitative assessment of the climate mitigation and adaption co-benefits\nshows the following:\n\n\n    - The project will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and,\ntherefore, reduce the risk of climate change through:\n\n\n`o` The rehabilitation and construction of wastewater and septic sludge treatment\nfacilities. This will reduce the uncontrolled anaerobic digestion of organic\n\n\n77\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                87
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "material contained in wastewater and fecal sludge and, therefore, reduce\ngreenhouse gas emissions, especially the release of methane.\n\n\n`o` The reduction of NRW and the replacement of pumps and other equipment with\nmore energy-efficient equipment will reduce the energy consumption per unit of\nwater supplied to customers.\n\n\n74. The coastal area and the north and northeastern areas of Kenya are experiencing severe\ndroughts every few years, while in other years, extensive flooding can also occur. The project will\nlower the current and future risks and vulnerabilities posed by climate change through the\nfollowing activities:\n\n\n    - In the coastal areas, the project will assist in making Mwache Dam fully operational\nby contributing to the downstream infrastructure. In addition, it will contribute to the\nimprovement of another bulk water source, the Baricho wellfield. These interventions\nare based on a water supply masterplan covering the entire coastal area. Because these\nactivities will contribute to the diversification of water sources of the interconnected\nbulk water system, it will decrease the vulnerability of the system against climate risk.\nWhile some of the wellfields will respond quickly during and after droughts, Mwache\nDam can store water for a longer period, and Mzima springs has a very long response\ntime to droughts and the yield is usually only declining after the drought has ended\nand the wellfield production is restored.\n\n\n    - The project will also identify and promote activities of the IUWM that will increase\nthe climate resilience of the participating towns.\n\n\n    - NRW reduction will increase the efficiency of the systems covered under the project.\n\n\n    - Especially in the north and northeastern regions where open defecation is dominant\nand existing on-site facilities are prone to flooding, the improved sanitation will lower\nthe risk of spreading of cholera during periods of flooding.\n\n\n    - In Wajir, where many people rely on shallow wells that are negatively affected by\nboth droughts and floods, a more climate-resilient water resource will be developed\nunder the project.\n\n\n78\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                88
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 4: Implementation Support Plan**\n\n\n**KENYA: Water and Sanitation Development Project**\n\n\n**Strategy and Approach for Implementation Support**\n\n\n1. The WSDP includes a number of measures aimed at ensuring implementation proceeds as\nexpected.\n\n\n    - First, the World Bank will maintain a sizable WSDP core team in Nairobi. The team\nincludes specialists in institutions, operations, engineering, and M&E. Having the core\nteam based in Nairobi facilitates frequent dialogue with the Government counterpart\nteams and permits ongoing implementation support. The core team will be\nsupplemented with specialists in social accountability, gender, and others as needed.\n\n\n    - Second, the World Bank will conduct at least two formal missions per year for the\nWSDP. The missions will include the World Bank’s FM and procurement staff,\nsafeguards, M&E, results-based financing, engineers, and other specialists as required.\n\n\n    - Third, considerable safeguards have been put into place to guard against procurement\nfraud risk. These are presented in the procurement section of Annex 3.\n\n\n**Implementation Support Plan**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Time|Focus|Skills Needed|Resource<br>Estimate|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|First 12<br>months| Quality of terms of reference<br> Procurement of key contracts<br> Execution of contracts<br> Development and implementation of EMPs and RAPs<br> Selection of subprojects<br> Quality of detailed designs of subprojects<br> Developing mechanisms for social accountability| Core team skills<br> Procurement<br> FM<br> Environment and<br>social safeguards<br> Social accountability|Country<br>management<br>unit standard<br>supervision<br>budget for high-<br>risk projects|\n|12–60<br>months| Quality of terms of reference<br> Procurement of key contracts<br> Execution of contracts<br> Application of the EMPs and RAPs<br> Selection of subprojects<br> Quality of detailed designs of subprojects<br> Implementing mechanisms for social accountability<br> Quality and timeliness of construction| Core team skills<br> Procurement<br> FM<br> Environment and<br>social safeguards<br> Social accountability|Country<br>management<br>unit standard<br>supervision<br>budget for high-<br>risk projects|\n\n\n79\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                89
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "|Skills Mix Required|Col2|Col3|Col4|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|**Skills Needed**|**Number of**<br>**Staff Weeks**|**Number of**<br>**Trips**|**Comments**|\n|Task team leader|15|2 international|Staff time shared with other water<br>projects|\n|Co-task team leader|30||Based in Nairobi, staff time shared<br>with other water projects|\n|Results-based financing|4|2 international|Staff time shared with other water<br>projects|\n|Institutional|10||Based in Nairobi, staff time shared<br>with other water projects|\n|Engineering|15||Based in Nairobi, staff time shared<br>with other projects|\n|Utility financial and operational issues|4|2 international|Staff time shared with other water<br>projects|\n|Social accountability and citizen<br>engagement|4||Based in Nairobi|\n|M&E and implementation support|5||Core team based in Nairobi, staff time<br>shared with other urban projects|\n|Procurement|4||Based in Nairobi|\n|FM|4||Based in Nairobi|\n|Environmental and social safeguards|8||Based in Nairobi|\n\n\n|Partners|Col2|Col3|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Name**|**Institution/Country**|**Role**|\n|Sebastien Valleur, Deputy Head of<br>Nairobi Office|AFD - Kenya|Parallel financing of infrastructure<br>in coastal area|\n\n\n80\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Utility financial and operational issues",
+                    "confidence": 0.5950349569320679,
+                    "start": 179,
+                    "end": 184
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            },
+            {
+                "dataset_name": {
+                    "text": "Parallel financing of infrastructure",
+                    "confidence": 0.6091925501823425,
+                    "start": 337,
+                    "end": 341
+                },
+                "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+                "description": null,
+                "data_type": null,
+                "acronym": null,
+                "author": null,
+                "producer": null,
+                "geography": null,
+                "publication_year": null,
+                "reference_year": null,
+                "reference_population": null,
+                "is_used": "False",
+                "usage_context": "background"
+            }
+        ],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                90
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 5: Financial and Economic Analysis**\n\n\n**KENYA: Water and Sanitation Development Project**\n\n\n**Economic and Financial Analyses**\n\n\n_**Component 1**_\n\n\n1. **Financial analysis.** The financial analysis analyzes all cash flows associated with the\ninvestment (including capital costs, O&M costs, and revenues) and the financial sustainability of the\nparticipating WSPs. The financial analysis includes a lifetime projection of O&M costs, together\nwith a demonstration of how these will be financed. The financial analysis consists of (a) assessing\nthe financial performance of the WSPs, taking into account previous loans and the planned\ninvestment costs under the WSDP; and (b) assessing the impact of project investments on O&M and\nfinancial viability of the WSP, cost drivers (including different loan terms), and future revenue\nstreams and cash flows available to repay the loan. The Government of Kenya has decided to pass\non the funds under Component 1 with the IDA-SUF terms it is receiving them from the World Bank.\nHowever, 25 percent of the credit will be passed on as a grant to ease the financing cost for sanitation\ninvestments, which are not income generating, but provide important public health and\nenvironmental benefits.\n\n\n2. For Component 1 the financial analysis includes the coastal WSPs of Mombasa, Malindi,\nKwale, Kilifi, and Tavevo and the bulk water operation. The financial NPV and the financial IRR\nare estimated based on the stream of investment and O&M costs and operating revenues for a period\nof 40 years. The discounted rate of annual cash flow is 12 percent. The financial IRR is about 12.1\npercent, and the financial NPV is at about US$1.7 million (see Table 5.14 and 5.15). The financial\nprojection for the period of the economic life of the investments shows a stable positive cash flow,\nand, therefore, the investments are financially justified.\n\n\n3. A sensitivity analysis was performed, with assumptions presented in Table 5.1.\n\n\n**Table 5.1: Sensitivity Analysis of Financial IRR**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Scenario|Assumption|Financial IRR (%)|\n|---|---|---|\n|**Component 1**|**Component 1**|**Component 1**|\n|Base case scenario A|The bulk water supply will operate as one operation unit<br>together with Mwache Dam and related infrastructure, and<br>Mombasa will benefit 100 percent from Mwache Dam, while<br>four other coastal WSPs will be supplied increased bulk water<br>from increased production from bulk water operation unit<br>sources.|12.1|\n|Collection rates<br>scenario A, risk (a)|The collection rate will drop by 10 percent from the level of the<br>base case scenario, that is from 95 percent to 85 percent.|9.5|\n|Purchase of bulk water<br>scenario A, risk (b)|All five WSPs will purchase less 10 percent of the anticipated<br>amount, due to the lower-than-anticipated demand from the<br>tourism sector.|9.7|\n|Investments scenario<br>A, risk (c)|If NRW does not decrease as anticipated, that would increase<br>the O&M costs by 15 percent.|9.6|\n\n\n81\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                91
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "_Results of the financial analysis for the coastal WSPs of Mombasa, Malindi, Kwale, Kilifi, and_\n_Tavevo, and the bulk water operation_\n\n\n4. The improvements of the performance of six coastal WSPs is based on the anticipated impact\nof capital investments and management improvements on operational and financial indicators such\nas increased volume of water produced and sales, increased billing and collection revenues,\nincreased tariffs to cover O&M costs and debt service costs, increased sewerage connections and\nsewerage treatment, and reduced NRW due to the reduction of technical and non-technical losses.\nThe detailed financial analysis of the costs and revenues is provided below for each WSP under the\nproject.\n\n\n5. **Bulk water service provider.** The financial analysis of the bulk water service provider is\nbased on the approach that the new bulk water system (Mwache Dam, WTP, pump station, and\ndownstream infrastructure) will merge with the existing bulk water system (which is currently\noperating under the CWSB) and both systems will operate under one management. Based on this\napproach, the water production, loans repayment costs, capital investments, and O&M costs of the\nnew bulk water system are added to the existing bulk water service provider. Therefore, the bulk\nwater service provider (merged in one management) will incur a very high capital investments cost\nof about US$299 million and a corresponding high amount of IDA-SUF credits and AFD loans\n(under the KWSCRP AF and WSDP), which will affect the annual O&M costs and annual debt\nservice costs upward.\n\n\n6. Tables 5.2 and 5.3 display the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018 (2017\nbase year) to 2035.\n\n\n**Table 5.2: Summary of Performance Indicators for Bulk Water Service Provider (2018–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base Year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water production<br>(m3 000)|53,747|53,747|59,952|59,952|59,952|93,897|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales to WSPs<br>(m3 000)|46,222|46,222|51,558|51,558|51,558|80,751|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|14|14|14|14|14|14|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh<br>000)|1,141,290|1,487,201|1,741,028|1,916,586|2,012,415|3,303,879|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|70|85|90|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh<br>000)|901,624|1,404,484|1,474,855|1,548,697|1,626,132|2,663,325|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.9|0.9|1.1|1.2|1.2|1.2|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh<br>000)|484,568|958,089|950,124|933,883|917,879|2,332,937|\n|9.<br>Net Operating Income<br>(KSh 000)|139,061|897,591|1,195,679|1,375,668|1,389,271|2,578,969|\n|10. Debt service coverage<br>ratio|0.3|0.9|1.3|1.54|1.54|1.1|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n82\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                92
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Table 5.3: A Summary of Performance Indicators for Bulk Water Service Provider (2018–2035)**\n\n|ontinued)|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**2023**|**2024**|**2025**|**2030**|**2035**|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water production (m3 000)|110,869|127,842|127,842|150,837|150,837|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales to WSPs (m3 <br>000)|95,347|109,944|109,944|129,719|129,719|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|14|14|14|14|14|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|4,094,266|4,955,431|5,203,203|7,832,616|9,992,605|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6. Operating costs (KSh 000)|2,748,697|3,058,829|3,404,492|3,519,580|5,530,347|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.4|1.5|1.5|2.1|1.7|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|2,332,937|2,318,250|2,284,981|2,827,910|2,770,466|\n|9.<br>Net Operating Income (KSh 000)|2,744,464|2,752,439|2,888,550|5,025,013|5,066,236|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|1.2|1.2|1.0|1.8|4.4|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n7. According to Tables 5.2 and 5.3, the utility will start covering the O&M costs and debt\nservice costs from 2019 onward. One of the key drivers of these two indicators is the expected\nincrease of bulk water production and sales by 75 percent and 70 percent, respectively, in 2022 from\n2017. The production and sales will have another increase in 2025, which will have a further impact\non the revenues of the utility from 2025 and onward. The second key driver of the financial viability\nof the service provider is the anticipated increase of the bulk water from KSh 25 per cubic meter in\n2017 to KSh 32 per cubic meter in 2018 to ensure cost recovery. The anticipated increase of the\nvolume and the tariff will increase the operating revenues in 2022 by more than two times compared\nto 2017. The utility has suffered from the low payments from the coastal WSPs as the main big\nbuyers of bulk water, and the anticipated increase of the collection ratio is expected to be another\nimportant driver to boost the collected revenues. NRW in 2016 is 14 percent, which is forecasted to\nremain constant throughout the financial analysis period.\n\n\n8. **Mombasa WSP.** The Mombasa utility will receive funds on-lent under IDA-SUF terms to\nfinance investments under the WSDP for improvements of the water supply network. Mombasa will\nreceive investments for the rehabilitation of the Kipevu wastewater treatment plant and expansion\nof the sewage network in the west mainland and for the construction of a new Shimo La Teva\nwastewater treatment plant both with the sewage network in the north mainland. The total capital\ninvestments for the utility under the WSDP will be US$74.9 million, which will be financed with an\nIDA-SUF credit and an AFD loan. In addition, there is an IDA-SUF credit of US$20 million under\nthe ongoing KWSCRP AF, which will increase the total amount to about US$95 million. The total\namount of loan repayment costs under WaSSIP and WaSSIP AF, under KWSCRP AF, and the new\nloan repayment costs under the WSDP are expected to be covered through the net operating income\nduring the maturity of the loans.\n\n\n9. Tables 5.4 and 5.5 display the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018 (2017\nbase year) to 2035.\n\n\n83\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                93
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Table 5.4: Summary of Performance Indicators for Mombasa WSP (2018–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base Year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|20,499|20,499|23,167|23,167|23,167|47,806|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|9,840|13,324|15,754|16,217|16,680|35,855|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|52|35|32|30|28|25|\n|4. Operating revenues (KSh 000)|1,029,961|2,088,908|2,557,486|2,842,983|3,053,337|6,718,352|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|87|88|89|90|90|90|\n|6. Operating costs (KSh 000)|1,098,153|1,538,141|1,742,108|1,847,431|1,949,053|3,344,466|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.8|1.2|1.3|1.4|1.4|1.8|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|120,273|636,563|628,916|617,741|606,739|762,569|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|17,530|744,870|978,826|1,156,025|1,243,722|3,146,822|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|0.1|1.2|1.6|1.9|2.0|4.1|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n**Table 5.5: Summary of Performance Indicators for Mombasa WSP (2018–2035) (continued)**\n\n|Indicator|2023|2024|2025|2030|2035|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1. Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|62,403|76,999|76,999|90,849|90,849|\n|2. Bulk water sales (m3 000)|46,802|57,749|57,749|68,137|68,137|\n|3. NRW (%)|25|25|25|25|25|\n|4. Operating revenues (KSh 000)|8,935,840|11,250,842|11,837,638|17,442,632|22,302,219|\n|5. Collection ratio (%)|90|90|90|90|90|\n|6. Operating costs (KSh 000)|4,289,917|5,402,480|5,673,694|8,946,752|10,514,426|\n|7. O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.9|1.9|1.9|1.8|1.9|\n|8. Debts service costs (KSh 000)|751,995|739,387|903,673|723,345|509,211|\n|9. Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|4,197,110|5,168,050|5,424,952|7,196,389|10,002,343|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|5.6|7.0|6.0|9.9|19.6|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n10. According to Tables 5.4 and 5.5, the utility is expected to exhibit a good financial\nperformance that would result in positive cost coverage of the two financial indicators of O&M and\ndebt service costs. The utility is expected to show financial viability from 2018 onward. One of the\nkey drivers of the expected financial performance of the Mombasa WSP is the increase of water\nsales by more than two times in five years of the project implementation due to the high increase of\nbulk water purchase and reduction of NRW. NRW is expected to go down from 52 percent to 25\npercent, which will considerably affect the water sales. The Mombasa WSP has the highest level of\ntariffs in the coast, higher than Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company; therefore, the anticipated\nincrease of the tariffs by 5 percent will play a moderate role in the financial viability of the utility.\nThe performance of Mombasa will be affected by investments of the ongoing KWSCRP and the new\nWSDP. The investments anticipated in the WSDP will make available the bulk water from Mwache\nDam. The impact of the sewerage investments for two wastewater treatment plants and the associated\nsewage network on the utility will be seen after the completion of the investments in 2023.\nAdditionally, investments in sanitation are expected to improve services such as ablution blocks and\nsludge handlings, but with no visible impact on financial revenues.\n\n\n84\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                94
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "11. **Malindi WSP.** The Malindi utility will receive funds on-lent under IDA-SUF terms to\nfinance investments under the WSDP for improvements of water supply and sanitation services. The\ntotal capital investments for the utility will be US$26.1 million.\n\n\n12. Tables 5.6 and 5.7 present the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018 (2017\nbase year) to 2035.\n\n\n**Table 5.6: Summary of Performance Indicators for Malindi WSP (2018–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base Year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|6,869|7,077|8,411|8,411|8,411|8,411|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|4,554|5,095|6,224|6,308|6,308|6,308|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|34|28|26|25|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh,<br>thousands)|399,594|568,368|715,666|760,260|797,676|836,936|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh,<br>thousands)|413,684|450,834|524,738|570,457|598,927|628,815|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.9|1.2|1.3|1.3|1.3|1.3|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh,<br>thousands)|141,673|190,320|187,005|183,737|180,515|177,336|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|(28,553)|214,339|280,368|277,014|284,089|291,498|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|(0.2)|1.1|1.5|1.5|1.6|1.6|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n**Table 5.7: Summary of Performance Indicators for Malindi WSP (2018–2035) (continued)**\n\n|Indicator|2023|2024|2025|2030|2035|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|8,411|8,411|8,411|9,924|9,924|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|6,308|6,308|6,308|7,443|7,443|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|25|25|25|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|1,203,424|1,272,780|1,347,714|1,988,758|2,538,203|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|697,215|733,388|770,052|1,086,591|1,386,659|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.6|1.6|1.7|1.7|1.7|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|174,199|171,104|218,548|147,167|133,702|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|571,261|600,977|635,500|927,952|1,144,701|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|3.3|3.5|2.9|6.3|8.6|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n13. The utility is estimated to have a positive financial performance that will ensure O&M and\ndebt service costs coverage from 2018 onward. The increase of water sales by about 27 percent and\nof the tariffs by about 13 percent during the project implementation are the two key drivers of the\nfinancial viability of the utility. The O&M costs are expected to increase around 52 percent during\nthe project life, while operating revenues are expected to double during the same period. The last\none is estimated by the increase of water sales volume and tariffs as well. NRW is expected to go\ndown from 34 percent to 25 percent, which accounts for a moderate contribution to the water sales\nincrease. Additionally, the utility’s revenues will be affected moderately by the improved sanitation\n\n\n85\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                95
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "services after the construction of the wastewater treatment plant and services such as ablution blocks\nand sludge handlings.\n\n\n14. **Kilifi-Mariakani WSP.** The Kilifi utility will receive funds on-lent under IDA-SUF terms\nto finance investments under the WSDP for improvements of water supply and sanitation services.\nThe total capital investments for the utility will be US$11.7 million.\n\n\n15. Tables 5.8 and 5.9 present the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018 (2017\nbase year) to 2035.\n\n\n**Table 5.8: Summary of Performance Indicators for Kilifi-Mariakani WSP (2018–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base Year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|9,720.37|9,720.37|11,054.45|11,054.45|11,054.45|12,904.78|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|4,860.19|5,346.20|6,632.67|7,185.39|7,738.11|9,678.58|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|50|45|40|35|30|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|464,559|673,059|863,465|974,533|1,094,922|1,421,246|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|503,109|672,880|765,956|835,468|883,865|1,030,233|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.9|1.0|1.1|1.1|1.2|1.3|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|30,645|56,293|55,015|53,767|52,546|51,353|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|(30,762)|17,168|105,298|141,595|207,763|371,795|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|(1.0)|0.3|1.9|2.6|4.0|7.2|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n**Table 5.9: Summary of Performance Indicators for Kilifi-Mariakani WSP (2018–2035)**\n\n|(continued)|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|Col6|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**2023**|**2024**|**2025**|**2030**|**2035**|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|12,904.78|12,904.78|12,904.78|15,226|15,226|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|9,678.58|9,678.58|9,678.58|11,419|11,419|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|25|25|25|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|1,489,288|1,560,328|1,634,636|2,426,578|3,051,158|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|1,092,318|1,145,065|1,200,425|1,699,548|2,157,450|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.3|1.3|1.3|1.4|1.3|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|50,187|49,046|47,929|59,364|53,161|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh 000)|374,420|389,237|404,547|658,633|794,747|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|7.5|7.9|8.4|11.1|14.9|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n16. According to Tables 5.8 and 5.9, the utility is estimated to cover the O&M costs and debt\nservice costs by 2018 and 2019, respectively. The first key factor that will contribute to the financial\nrevenues will be the increase of water sales by about 99 percent in 2022 compared to 2017 due to\nthe reduction of NRW and increase of bulk water purchase volume. NRW is expected to go down\nfrom 50 percent in 2017 to 25 percent in 2022, which will noticeably affect the rise of water sales.\nThe second key factor is the anticipated increase of the weighted average tariff by 20 percent to\nensure cost recovery during the project life. The billing revenues are estimated to outweigh the O&M\n\n\n86\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                96
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "costs during the project life. Additionally, investments in sanitation are expected to improve services\nsuch as ablution blocks and sludge handlings, but with no visible impact on financial revenues.\n\n\n17. **Kwale WSP.** The Kwale utility will receive funds on-lent under IDA-SUF terms to finance\ninvestments under the WSDP for sanitation service improvements. Additionally, the utility is\nbenefiting from the ongoing KWSCRP’s investments for water supply improvements. The total\ncapital investments for the utility from both projects are US$7.15 million.\n\n\nTables 5.10 and 5.11 present the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018 (2017\nbase year) to 2035.\n\n**Table 5.10: Summary of Performance Indicators for Kwale WSP (2018–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base Year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|4,224.15|4,394.18|4,394.18|4,394.18|4,394.18|6,493.21|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|2,196.56|2,460.74|2,812.28|3,075.93|3,295.64|4,869.91|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|48|44|36|30|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|186,978|268,313|325,108|372,340|418,300|637,445|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|93|94|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|235,874|301,844|321,191|350,581|370,727|495,012|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.7|0.8|1.0|1.0|1.1|1.2|\n|8. Debts service costs (KSh 000)|37,832|37,324|36,816|36,310|62,471|61,983|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|(47,563)|(10,035)|27,255|42,736|66,251|150,154|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|(1.3)|(0.3)|0.7|1.2|1.1|2.4|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n**Table 5.11. Summary of Performance Indicators for Kwale WSP (2018–2035) (continued)**\n\n|Indicator|2023|2024|2025|2030|2035|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|6,493.21|6,493.21|6,493.21|7,661|7,661|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|4,869.91|4,869.91|4,869.91|5,746|5,746|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|25|25|25|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|669,403|702,873|738,017|1,103,826|1,408,793|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|519,967|545,955|573,243|818,144|1,044,126|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.2|1.2|1.2|1.3|1.3|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|61,146|60,308|59,471|27,867|27,867|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh<br>000)|155,560|161,369|167,468|270,085|333,821|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|2.5|2.7|2.8|9.7|12.0|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n18. Tables 5.10 and 5.11 show that the utility is expected to be financially viable from 2020\nonward. The utility is estimated to ensure O&M cost and debt service cost coverage in 2019 and\n2020, respectively. The increase of water sales by about 53 percent during the project life with the\nreduction of NRW from 48 percent to 25 percent is estimated to substantially affect operating\nrevenues. The anticipated increase of the water tariff by 14 percent to ensure cost recovery is another\ndriver to the estimated increase of the operating revenue, which is going to overpass the increase of\nthe O&M costs during the project life. Additionally, investments in sanitation are expected to\n\n\n87\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                97
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "improve services such as ablution blocks and sludge handlings, but with no visible impact on\nfinancial revenues.\n\n\n19. **Taita Taveta WSP.** The Tavevo utility will receive funds on-lent under IDA-SUF terms to\nfinance investments under the WSDP for the improvement of water supply and sanitation services.\nThe total capital investments for the utility will be US$9.0 million.\n\n\n20. Tables 5.12 and 5.13 present the key output and result indicators of the utility from 2018\n(2017 base year) to 2035.\n\n\n**Table 5.12. Summary of Performance Indicators for Taita Taveta WSP (2017–2035)**\n\n|Indicator|2017|2018|2019|2020|2021|2022|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Base year**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|4,531.4|4,531.4|4,531.4|5,135.6|5,135.6|5,135.6|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|2,265.7|2,492.3|2,718.9|3,338.1|3,851.7|3,851.7|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|50|45|40|35|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|138,866|239,153|274,669|356,458|456,194|550,400|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6. Operating costs (KSh 000)|257,749|318,993|336,964|370,235|420,101|447,608|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|0.5|0.7|0.8|0.9|1.0|1.2|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|55,666|54,377|53,118|51,890|50,689|49,517|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh 000)|(87,477)|(53,448)|(37,679)|6,749|51,633|113,622|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|(1.6)|(1.0)|(0.7)|0.1|1.0|2.3|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n**Table 5.13. Summary of Performance Indicators for Taveta WSP (2017–2035) (continued)**\n\n|Indicator|2023|2024|2025|2030|2035|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Indicator**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|**Forecast**|\n|1.<br>Bulk water purchase (m3 000)|5,135.6|5,135.6|6,059.4|6,059|6,059|\n|2.<br>Bulk water sales (m3 000)|3,851.7|3,851.7|4,544.5|4,545|4,545|\n|3.<br>NRW (%)|25|25|25|25|25|\n|4.<br>Operating revenues (KSh 000)|578,067|607,089|637,573|955,954|1,075,539|\n|5.<br>Collection ratio (%)|95|95|95|95|95|\n|6.<br>Operating costs (KSh 000)|469,352|492,173|516,126|725,207|906,786|\n|7.<br>O&M coverage ratio (%)|1.2|1.2|1.2|1.3|1.1|\n|8.<br>Debts service costs (KSh 000)|48,371|47,252|33,407|62,448|61,143|\n|9.<br>Net operating income (KSh,<br>000)|118,162|122,912|127,233|220,613|152,640|\n|10. Debt service coverage ratio|2.4|2.6|3.8|3.5|2.5|\n\n\n\n_Source:_ Profit and Loss Statement.\n\n\n21. According to Tables 5.12 and 5.13, the utility is expected to gradually improve the financial\nperformance and achieve O&M cost and debt service costs coverage by 2021. The 70 percent\nincrease of water sales during the project life due to reduction of NRW and increase of bulk water\npurchase volume is estimated to have a key role in the operating revenue increase. NRW is expected\nto go down from 50 percent in 2017 to 25 percent in 2021, which will noticeably affect the rise of\nwater sales. This impact on water sales is anticipated to be supplemented by the anticipated increase\nof the water tariff by 32 percent to ensure the financial viability of the utility to be able to repay the\nloans in addition to the O&M cost coverage. The utility had maintained very low tariffs, because it\nhad not adjusted its tariff since inception and was using extraordinary tariff adjustment in 2010.\n\n\n88\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                98
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "Investments in sanitation are expected to improve services such as ablution blocks and sludge\nhandlings, but with no visible impact on financial revenues.\n\n\n22. A summary of cash flow from the financial analysis for 40 years is summarized in Tables\n5.14 and 5.15. The analysis is based on:\n\n\n    - Estimation of increased demand for drinking water supply from domestic (consumption\nper connection), industrial, commercial, and public organizations for each of the five\ncoastal WSPs, as a result of project investments.\n\n\n    - Estimation of increased bulk water production and sales to coastal WSPs, as results of\nproject investments for increasing production capacity of existing sources, and of the\nnew Mwache Dam.\n\n\n    - Estimation of rapid decline in NRW.\n\n\n    - Estimation of wastewater generation per connection of water consumed for existing and\nnew connections, as a result of project investments for Mombasa,\n\n\n    - Estimation of water and sewerage tariffs of each of the five coastal WSPs that should\ncover the old and new debt service costs, and all investment costs, as well.\n\n\n    - Estimation of one bulk water supply tariff of Kenya shilling per cubic meter for the five\nWSPs that should cover the old and new debt service costs, and all investment costs, as\nwell.\n\n\n    - Estimations of revenues from domestic, industrial, commercial, public organizations\ncustomers, kiosks, and other revenues.\n\n\n    - Capital expenditures for the rehabilitation and expansion of water and sewage\ndistribution system.\n\n\n    - Estimation of operating expenses, fixed assets, and depreciation schedule due to new\ncapital investments.\n\n\n    - Estimation of debt service costs for each coastal WSP that will benefit from the project\nloans.\n\n\n23. **Economic analysis.** The economic analysis demonstrates the economic viability of the\nproject investments. The cost-benefit analysis estimates the economic feasibility of the project by\ncalculating the present value of cost and benefit streams and by determining the NPV and economic\nrate of return of the project, using a discount rate of 12 percent. The net benefit of the project is\nestimated as the incremental benefit of the ‘with’ and ‘without’ project scenarios. A summary of the\neconomic analysis for the water supply investments is presented below (Table 5.14). The IRR is\nabout 14.9 percent, and the NPV is at about US$208.7 million. Detailed results of the economic and\nfinancial IRR and NPV for each WSP are presented in Table 5.15.\n\n\n89\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                99
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Table 5.14: Summary of Cost-Benefit Analysis with Project**\n\n|Col1|Economic Analysis|Financial Analysis|\n|---|---|---|\n|**NPV (KSh, millions)**|208.7|1.7|\n|**IRR (%)**|14.9|12.1|\n\n\n\n**Table 5.15: Summary of Cost-Benefit Analysis with Project**\n\n|Col1|Economic<br>Analysis|Financial<br>Analysis|Economic<br>Analysis|Financial<br>Analysis|Economic<br>Analysis|Financial<br>Analysis|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||**Mombasa**|**Mombasa**|**Malindi**|**Malindi**|**Kwale**|**Kwale**|\n|**NPV (KSh, millions)**|43.1|19.8|15,614|3,277|3,080|2,602|\n|**IRR (%)**|21|16|17.3|12.0|21.1|18.5|\n||**Kilifi**|**Kilifi**|**Tavevo**|**Tavevo**|**Bulk Water Operation**|**Bulk Water Operation**|\n|**NPV (KSh, millions)**|4,375|977|3,304|3,526|238,857|307,580|\n|**IRR (%)**|20.5|13.8|12.5|16.2|10.3|12.7|\n\n\n\n_Affordability of tariffs_\n\n\n24. All WSPs have applied WASREB’s tariff policy for providing sustainable and affordable\nwater supply and sanitation services to the poor to cover basic human needs, while ensuring financial\nviability of the services provided. The block tariff structure of the WSPs incorporates the pro-poor\npolicy through the provision of a tariff well below the cost of providing the services for the first six\ncubic meters of consumption per connection per month.\n\n\n_**Component 2**_\n\n\n25. Currently, neither Wajir nor Dadaab are recovering the full cost of water and sanitation\nservices from consumers. County subsidies fill the gap. This is mainly due to the high cost of diesel\nto run the borehole pumps. In Dadaab, which serves the population through eight boreholes, about\n90 percent of the average monthly revenues is used to pay for diesel. With the remaining 10 percent\nof the operating revenues, the cost for staff and repair and maintenance cannot be covered. In Wajir,\nthe boreholes that rely solely on diesel generators incurred higher costs than those which also draw\non solar panels for energy. For example, in Khorof Harar, where pumps are powered by a mix of\ngenerators and solar panels, the water production costs were estimated to be KSh 22 per cubic meter,\nwhile at Haandaki which relies on generators only, the production costs are KSh 44 per cubic\nmeter. [27] The WSDP will equip all boreholes in Wajir and Dadaab with solar panels. This is expected\nto reduce the cost of energy by about 50 percent, helping make the operation of boreholes financially\nself-sustaining.\n\n\n26. A comprehensive economic and financial analysis will be performed for Component 2 as\npart of the ongoing feasibility studies for proposed investments in Wajir and Garissa Counties. The\neconomic and financial analysis will follow the approach used above for Component 1.\n\n\n27 On average, most of the water points rely on generators only for production.\n\n\n90\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                100
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "_**Component 3**_\n\n\n27. **While the specific investments to be supported under Component 3 are not known at**\n**this time, financial analyses for potential investments have been carried out.** The following are\nsummaries of analyses for two investments:\n\n\n    - For three possible energy savings investments, the payback periods varied between 13\nand 29 months, making them all financially viable investments. The one with the\nshortest payback period is superior to the others.\n\n\n    - Ruiru had approached the KPWF seeking funding of about US$8 million for the\nproposed water supply and sanitation investments. KPWF declined to finance the\nproposed investments because they would not generate adequate returns to repay the\nloan under KPWF lending terms. The financial model summarized in Annex 2 shows\nthat the proposed investments would generate adequate returns if they were financed\nwith a mix of the KPWF and WSDP funds, which come with more favorable lending\nterms. However, it must be noted that this is only an example to show the potential of\nmixing the WSDP and KPWF funds.\n\n\n28. To compare the efficiency of three proposals for replacing pumps to reduce O&M cost, the\npayback for each proposal was calculated and compared. The results are presented in Table 5.16.\nAll three show very good payback periods with the one for Kiambu being the lowest and the one for\nNairobi being the highest.\n\n\n**Table 5.16: Payback Periods for Three Proposals for Pump Replacements Which Could Be**\n\n|Considered under Component 3|Col2|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Parameters**|**Nairobi**|**Kiambu**|**Machakos**|**Total**|\n|**Parameters**|**Kabete Water**<br>**Treatment Plant**|**Thika Water**<br>**Treatment Plant**|**Machakos Water**<br>**Treatment Plant**|**Machakos Water**<br>**Treatment Plant**|\n|Power saving (kW)|120.1|106|24|250.1|\n|Annual energy saving (kWh)|518,895|887,823|132,060|1,538,778|\n|Annual monetary saving (KSh, millions)|8.07|13.8|2.05|23.92|\n|Estimated investment (KSh, millions)|19.28|14.49|3.76|37.53|\n|Simple payback period (months)|29|13|22|19|\n\n\n\n91\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                101
+            ]
+        }
+    },
+    {
+        "input_text": "**Annex 6: Map**\n\n\n92\n\n\n",
+        "datasets": [],
+        "document": {
+            "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/899451500992254422/pdf/Kenya-Water-PAD-04072017.pdf",
+            "pages": [
+                102
+            ]
+        }
+    }
+]
\ No newline at end of file