diff --git "a/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_101/raw/doc_101_raw.json" "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_101/raw/doc_101_raw.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/annotation_data/wbg_extractions/doc_101/raw/doc_101_raw.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,7986 @@
+[
+ {
+ "input_text": "Document of\n# **The World Bank**\n\n**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY**\n\nReport No: PAD2425\n\nINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION\n\n\nPROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT\n\n\nON\n\n\nPROPOSED GRANTS FROM THE IDA CRISIS RESPONSE WINDOW\n\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF\nSDR21.9 MILLION (US$30 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nTO THE\n\n\nFOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS\n\n\nAND\n\n\nIN THE AMOUNT OF\nSDR14.6 MILLION (US$20 MILLION EQUIVALENT)\n\n\nTO THE\n\n\nINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS\n\n\nFOR A\n\n\nSOMALIA EMERGENCY DROUGHT RESPONSE AND RECOVERY PROJECT\n\n\nMAY 22, 2017\n\n\nSocial, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice\nAfrica Region\n\n\nThis document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of\ntheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 0
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS\n\n\n(Exchange Rate Effective Apr 30, 2017)\n\n\nCurrency Unit = USD\n\n\n0.72938396 = US$1\n\n\nUS$1.37102 = SDR 1\n\n\nFISCAL YEAR\nJanuary 1 - December 31\n\n\nRegional Vice President: Makhtar Diop\n\n\nCountry Director: Bella Bird\n\n\nSenior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez\n\n\nPractice Manager: Bernice K. Van Bronkhorst\n\n\nTask Team Leader(s): Ayaz Parvez, Robert Reid\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 1
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|Col1|ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS|\n|---|---|\n|AfDB|African Development Bank|\n|APA|Alternative Procurement Arrangement|\n|AML|Anti-Money Laundering|\n|ATF|Anti-Terrorism Financing|\n|AWD|Acute Watery Diarrhea|\n|BENALPA|Benadir Livestock Professional Association|\n|CAHW|Community Animal Health Worker|\n|CERELPA|Central Regions Livestock Professional Association|\n|CIG|Common Interest Group|\n|CIP|Public Sector Capacity Injection and Institutional Strengthening|\n|CMWG|Cash and Markets Working Group|\n|CRW|Crisis Response Window|\n|CSSD|Corporate Support Services Department|\n|DFID|Department for International Development|\n|EcoSec|Economic Security|\n|EHI|Essential Household Item|\n|ENDVI|Enhanced Normalize Difference Vegetation Index|\n|ESMF|Environmental and Social Management Framework|\n|ESMP|Environmental and Social Management Plans|\n|EU|European Union|\n|FAO|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations|\n|FCV|Fragility, Conflict and Violence|\n|FEWS NET|Famine Early Warning System Network|\n|FGS|Federal Government of Somalia|\n|FM|Financial Management|\n|FMFA|Financial Management Framework Agreement|\n|FMT|Form Management Tool|\n|FPA|Fiduciary Principles Accord|\n|FPMIS|Financial Programs Management Information Systems|\n|FSNAU|Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit|\n|FY|Fiscal Year|\n|GBV|Gender-Based Violence|\n|GDP|Gross Domestic Product|\n|GFDRR|Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery|\n|GOC|General Objective Code|\n|GRM|Grievance Redress Mechanism|\n|HIPC|Heavily Indebted Poor Countries|\n|HH|Household|\n|IBRD|International Bank for Reconstruction and Development|\n|ICRC|International Committee of the Red Cross|\n|ICT|Information and Communication Technology|\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 2
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|IDA|International Development Association|\n|---|---|\n|IDP|Internally Displaced People|\n|IEG|Independent Evaluation Group|\n|IFC|International Finance Corporation|\n|IFR|Interim un-audited Financial Report|\n|IFRC|International Federation of the Red Cross|\n|IFRS|International Financial Reporting Standards|\n|IMF|International Monetary Fund|\n|INS|Interim Strategy Note|\n|IOM|International Organization for Migration|\n|IP|Indigenous Peoples|\n|IPC|Integrated Food Security Phase Classification|\n|ISP|Implementation Support Plan|\n|ISR|Implementation Status Report|\n|M&E|Monitoring and Evaluation|\n|MCH|Mother and Child Health|\n|MPF|Multi-Partner Fund|\n|NDP|National Development Plan|\n|NFI|Non Food Items|\n|NGO|Non-Governmental Organization|\n|NPV|Net Present Value|\n|ORD|Oral Rehydration Salts|\n|OIG|Office of the Inspector General|\n|OTP|Outpatient Therapeutic Program|\n|PDO|Project Development Objective|\n|PFM|Public Financial Management|\n|PHC|Primary Health Care|\n|PLW|Pregnant and Lactating Women|\n|PPR|Peste des petits ruminants|\n|PPSD|Project Procurement Strategy for Development|\n|PSEA|Protection Against Sexual Exploitation and Abuse|\n|PSP|Payment Service Provider|\n|RDNA|Rapid Drought Needs Assessment|\n|RCRF|Recurrent Cost & Reform Financing|\n|RMU|Risk Monitoring Unit|\n|SAP|Safeguards Action Plan|\n|SBCF|Somalia Business Catalytic Fund|\n|SCD|Systematic Country Diagnostic|\n|SCoA|Standard Chart of Account|\n|SCORE|Somalia Core Economic Institutions and Opportunities Program|\n|SCZ|South Central Zone|\n|SEDRP|Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project|\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 3
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "|SGP|Sheep and Goat Pox|\n|---|---|\n|SME|Small and Medium-sized Enterprises|\n|SOWELPA|South West Livestock Professional Association|\n|SP|Service Provider|\n|SORT|Systematic Operations Risk Rating Tool|\n|SRCS|Somali Red Crescent Society|\n|SURRP|Somalia Urban Resilience and Recovery Project|\n|SWALIM|The Somalia Water and Land Information Management|\n|TA|Technical Assistance|\n|TPTR|Third-Party Technical Review|\n|TWG|Technical Working Group|\n|ToR|Terms of Reference|\n|UN|United Nations|\n|UGMH|United Nations Global Marketplace|\n|UN HABITAT|The United Nations Human Settlements Programme|\n|UN OCHA|The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs|\n|UNDP|United Nations Development Programme|\n|UNICEF|The United Nations Children's Fund|\n|USAID|United States Agency for International Development|\n|WASH|Water, Sanitation and Hygiene|\n|WB|World Bank|\n|WBG|World Bank Group|\n|WDR|World Development Report|\n|WFP|World Food Programme|\n|WHH|Women Headed Households|\n|WHO|World Health Organization|\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Systematic Operations Risk Rating Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.9522348046302795,
+ "start": 43,
+ "end": 48
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7821481227874756,
+ "start": 60,
+ "end": 61
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "World Development Report",
+ "confidence": 0.9688517451286316,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 202
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 4
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Is this a regionally tagged project?|Country(ies)|Financing Instrument|\n|---|---|---|\n|No
||Investment Project Financing|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Approval Date|Closing Date|Environmental Assessment Category|\n|---|---|---|\n|30-May-2017|29-Jun-2018|B - Partial Assessment
|\n|Bank/IFC Collaboration|
|
|\n|No|||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 1 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 5
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|[ ]
Counterpart
Funding|[ ] IBRD|[ ] IDA Credit
[ ] Crisis Response
Window
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|[ ✔ ] IDA Grant
[ ✔ ] Crisis Response
Window
[ ] Regional Projects
Window|Col5|[ ] Trust
Funds|[ ]
Parallel
Financing|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|~~FIN COST OLD ~~
Total Project Cost:
50.00
|~~FIN COST OLD ~~
Total Project Cost:
50.00
||||||\n|~~FIN COST OLD ~~
Total Project Cost:
50.00
|~~FIN COST OLD ~~
Total Project Cost:
50.00
|
Total Financing:
50.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IBRD/IDA):
50.00|
Total Financing:
50.00
Of Which Bank Financing (IBRD/IDA):
50.00|
Financing Gap:
0.00
|
Financing Gap:
0.00
|
Financing Gap:
0.00
|\n||||||||\n\n\n|Financing (in US$, millions) FIN_SUMM_OLD|Col2|\n|---|---|\n|
**Financing Source **
**Amount**
||\n|IDA Grant
50.00
|IDA Grant
50.00
|\n|**Total**
** 50.00**
|**Total**
** 50.00**
|\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 2 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 6
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 3 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 7
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 4 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 8
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 5 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 9
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 6 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 10
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\nPage 7 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 11
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 8 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 12
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nSOMALIA\nSOMALIA EMERGENCY DROUGHT RESPONSE AND RECOVERY PROJECT\n\n\n**TABLE OF CONTENTS**\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 11**\n\n\n**A. Introduction** ...................................................................................................................... 11\n\n\n**B. Country Context** ................................................................................................................ 12\n\n\n**C. Situation in Urgent Need of Assistance** ........................................................................... 13\n\n\n**D. Sectoral and Institutional Context** ................................................................................... 22\n\n\n**E. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes** ............................................. 24\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................ 26**\n\n\n**A. PDO** ................................................................................................................................... 26\n\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries** ......................................................................................................... 26\n\n\n**C. PDO-Level Results Indicators** ........................................................................................... 27\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 27**\n\n\n**A. Project Components** ......................................................................................................... 27\n\n\n**B. Project Cost and Financing** ............................................................................................... 30\n\n\n**C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design** ..................................................... 31\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................ 33**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements** ........................................................... 33\n\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation** ................................................................................. 34\n\n\n**C. Sustainability** .................................................................................................................... 35\n\n\n**D. Role of Partners** ................................................................................................................ 35\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS ..................................................................................................................... 36**\n\n\n**A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks** ........................................................... 36\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 38**\n\n\n**A. Economic Analysis** ............................................................................................................ 38\n\n\n**B. Technical** ........................................................................................................................... 39\n\n\n**C. Financial Management** ..................................................................................................... 40\n\n\n**D. Procurement** ..................................................................................................................... 41\n\n\n**E. Social (including Safeguards)** ............................................................................................ 42\n\n\nPage 9 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 13
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**F. Environment (including Safeguards)** ................................................................................ 44\n\n\n**H. World Bank Grievance Redress** ....................................................................................... 44\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING .................................................................... 46**\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 54**\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .................................................................... 65**\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 98**\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................... 101**\n\n\n**ANNEX 5: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN .................................................................... 108**\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: MAP OF SOMALIA .............................................................................................. 111**\n\n\nPage 10 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 14
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**I.** **STRATEGIC CONTEXT**\n\n\n**A. Introduction**\n\n\n1. **According to the United Nations, the current food crisis is the worst humanitarian crisis since 1945,**\n**with more than 20 million people across a number of countries facing famine or the risk of famine over the**\n**coming six months.** An estimated 1.4 million children are at imminent risk of death from severe acute\nmalnutrition. Within this crisis, the Horn of Africa is particularly affected, with widespread reports of livestock\ndeaths, water shortages, and rising rates of malnutrition in parts of Ethiopia, Kenya, South Sudan, and\nSomalia. In several of the worst affected countries, the crisis is linked to a mix of conflict, climate change and\ndrought and is further aggravating already protracted displacement and other cross border spill overs. As\nfamine looms in Somalia and South Sudan, the number of refugees and internally displaced people is rising,\nwith a resulting strain on already overstretched government facilities and systems. Addressing the spillover\neffects of this crisis requires an integrated regional response. The present operation is part of the World\nBank’s (WB) broader regional crisis response program, a set of approximately 10 individual operations\nfinanced by about US$900 million in new IDA resources (including US$360 million from IDA’s Crisis Response\nWindow), and trust fund commitments to support famine relief, recovery and longer-term resilience for 6\ncountries, including North East Nigeria, South Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Kenya and Yemen.\n\n2. **The proposed Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (SEDRP) seeks the approval**\n**of the WB’s Board of Executive Directors to provide grants of US$50 million equivalent from the**\n**International Development Association (IDA) Crisis Response Window (CRW) to respond to the dire and**\n**deteriorating humanitarian situation in Somalia.** Somalia is on the brink of famine resulting primarily from\nsevere drought. An estimated 6.7 million – half the population – are acutely food insecure and in urgent need\nof humanitarian assistance, mostly in remote rural areas. [1] In the last few months since the failed October\nrains, Somalia has seen 5 percent of its population, or 600,000 people, newly displaced. Livelihoods have\nbeen wiped out, malnutrition is increasing with over a million children in need of treatment this year, and\nfatalities from Acute Watery Diarrhea (AWD)/cholera are on the rise. By November 2016, drought was\ndeclared nationwide by federal and regional authorities. The impact of the drought and resulting crisis has\noverwhelmed national response capacities in Somalia. As a result, the President of Somalia declared a\n“national disaster” in February 2017. This shock is taking place in an existing fragile conflict environment with\nhigh levels of poverty, widespread internal and external displacement, deep communal tensions, and a\nnascent federal government. While pledges from the international community have been impressive, the\nspeed of delivery is key to averting famine in the coming months. Moreover, many agro-pastoral and pastoral\ncommunities will remain vulnerable to further deterioration of their situation through the coming year unless\nsupport is provided to rebuild their asset base.\n\n\n3. **Given Somalia’s non-accrual status to IDA, the project will be on an exceptional basis, reflecting**\n**international recognition of the exceptional circumstances in the Horn of Africa.** The project also makes full\nuse of an “Agility” approach – both in terms of speed of preparation and flexibility of implementation,\nestablishing new partnerships for the World Bank with strategic agencies with access to affected\ncommunities, including in Somalia’s hard to reach areas. At the same time, the project will leverage World\nBank technical expertise into the recovery and resilience-building agenda in Somalia, in recognition of the\n\n\n1 FSNAU/FEWS NET: Somalia Food Security Alert, 9 May 2017\n\n\nPage 11 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6073166131973267,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Horn of Africa",
+ "confidence": 0.6795696020126343,
+ "start": 115,
+ "end": 118
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6437783241271973,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 330
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7184467911720276,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 310
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDA",
+ "confidence": 0.6974255442619324,
+ "start": 651,
+ "end": 652
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8248373866081238,
+ "start": 645,
+ "end": 646
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.898861825466156,
+ "start": 771,
+ "end": 772
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "affected\ncommunities",
+ "confidence": 0.5268733501434326,
+ "start": 719,
+ "end": 721
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 15
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nprotracted and recurrent nature of droughts in the region.\n\n\n**B. Country Context**\n\n\n4. **Somalia has been in conflict for over twenty years, many of which have been without a formally**\n**recognized government** . Since the collapse of the Siad Barre government in 1991, southern Somalia has\nexperienced cycles of conflict that have fragmented the country, destroyed legitimate institutions and\ncreated widespread vulnerability. Between 1988 and 1993, civil war destroyed Mogadishu and Hargeisa,\nwhich resulted in tens of thousands of civilian deaths in north-west Somalia alone and exacerbated the 1991\nfamine. Peace conferences finally led to the formation of the Transitional National Government (TNG) in\n2000, and then the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) in 2004, but both were undermined by a\nsuccession of intervening events, giving rise to militia-based opposition and today’s Al-Shabaab movement. In\nAugust 2012, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) was brought to power under a provisional\nconstitution approved by a new parliament – ending Somalia’s long period of revolving transitional\ngovernments. Since its establishment, the FGS has stated its commitment to improved governance and\neconomic management and is preparing to lay the foundations for the implementation of a federal system of\ngovernance. **This progress has been recognized by the international community and there is a renewed**\n**momentum around arrears clearance.**\n\n\n5. **Consumption and remittances remain key drivers of the economy.** In 2016, household consumption,\nfinanced by remittances, was equivalent to over 100 percent of Somalia’s total nominal Gross Domestic\nProduct (GDP). The Somali economy is also highly dependent on imports accounting for two thirds of GDP. With\npolitical stability, government expenditure has started to expand as a share of GDP. Federal expenditure\nincreased from US$35.1 million in 2012 to US$168 million in 2016. This increase is mainly driven by\ncompensation of employees and use of goods and services, which consumes over 70 percent of domestic\nrevenue. An estimated 52 percent of the population remain poor, based on a US$1.90 PPP adjusted poverty\nline. Poverty is most acute among the IDP population of over 1.1 million people. The Somali population living\nin IDP settlements have a poverty headcount rate of 73 percent compared to urban and rural households\nwith headcount rates of 45 and 51 percent respectively. [2 ]\n\n6. **As of today, Somalia remains ineligible for IDA given its outstanding debt arrears to IDA and other**\n**international financial institutions – cutting the country off from a critical source of predictable**\n**development financing.** World Bank disengagement was reversed in early 2013 with the re-opening of direct\nand legal relations with the FGS, following a constitutional settlement and the withdrawal of Al-Shabaab from\nMogadishu and other major urban centers. The WB’s re-engagement was an integral part of the\nreconstitution of international support under a New Deal Compact with the authorities and allowing for the\nchanneling of donor resources to the government through a World Bank administered trust fund – the MultiPartner Fund for Somalia (MPF) – working in close alignment with the UN and African Development Bank\n(AfDB). A key focus of the Bank’s MPF-funded program in the last 4 years has therefore been to re-establish\nthe basic functioning of state institutions in Somalia to enable the authorities to demonstrate a track record\nof economic governance monitored under the ongoing International Monetary Fund (IMF) Staff Monitored\nProgram, and to pursue the technical steps in the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, under\nwhich it is eligible for future debt relief. With funding from 8 donors, the WB is supporting programs for\n\n\n2 IDA Crisis Response Window Support for a Regional Drought Response in AFR and MNA\n\n\nPage 12 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 16
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nPublic Financial Management (PFM), recurrent cost financing, service delivery, capacity injection and urban\nresilience. Together with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the WB also engages directly with\nSomalia’s vibrant private sector through a Public Private Dialogue forum and with a range of Technical\nAssistance (TA) in support of financial sector development, Information and Communication Technology (ICT)\nand Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) development.\n\n\n7. **Over the last few years, the federal system has taken shape with the constitution of 5 sub-national**\n**regional governments, federal and sub-federal parliaments, a fourfold increase in revenue generation, the**\n**emergence of national institutions including the Central Bank and two peaceful transfers of power.** In May\n2017, the new President of Somalia, Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed “Farmaajo”, opened the London\nConference on Somalia alongside the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Theresa May and the United Nations\nSecretary General António Guterres, heralding a new phase of Somalia’s development and a federal\nsettlement on a new security architecture for the country.\n\n\n8. **Despite these historic milestones and the country’s positive outlook, Somalia’s economy and**\n**population of around 12.3 million** **[3]** **remain extremely vulnerable to a range of socio-economic and climate-**\n**induced risks.** The combination of conflict, environmental degradation and prolonged drought have\ncontributed to full-scale humanitarian crises. The ongoing conflict and the presence of Al-Shabaab has\nconstrained economic growth and access of international humanitarian and development aid. Al-Shabaab still\ncontrols significant portions of Somalia, particularly in the south and in rural areas. Many of the people\naffected by drought are in areas under the control of Al-Shabaab, making it difficult for assistance to reach\nthem. [4] These factors underline the continued and extreme vulnerability of Somali communities as well as the\nweakness of the government in Mogadishu and sub-national level to be able to respond to the crisis.\n\n\n**C. Situation in Urgent Need of Assistance**\n\n\n9. **Humanitarian conditions continue to deteriorate.** An estimated 3.2 million people are in Integrated\nFood Security Phase Classification (IPC) Phase 3 and 4 due to acute food insecurity. [5] These levels will be\nsustained through June or deteriorate further if “Gu” rains fail in the coming rainfall season (April-June).\nAdditionally, approximately 1.4 million Somalia children will need treatment for acute malnutrition, which\nwill also have long-term impact on stunting. Somali children and their mothers continue to suffer from\nmultiple nutritional deprivations which deny them the opportunity to thrive and reach their full\ndevelopmental potential. There are high levels of acute malnutrition, underweight and stunting combined\nwith a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies and suboptimal breastfeeding and complementary\nfeeding practices. [6]\n\n\n10. **The scarcity of safe drinking water has led to outbreaks of AWD/cholera in 13 out of 18 regions**\n\n\n3 Interim Strategy Note; Report No. 7512 – SO; for the Federal Republic of Somalia; November 11, 2013\n4 http://amisom-au.org/2017/03/somalia-declares-drought-a-national-disaster\n5 The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), consisting of five phases, is a means to classify varying\nphases of current food security situations based on outcomes on human lives and livelihoods. The phases are: (1)\nGenerally food secure; (2) Moderately/Borderline food insecurity; (3) Acute food & livelihood crisis; (4)\nHumanitarian emergency; and (5) Famine/Humanitarian catastrophe\n6 https://www.unicef.org/somalia/nutrition.html\n\n\nPage 13 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 17
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**resulting in 618 fatalities since the start of 2017.** [7] This in part is due to widespread water shortages, food\ninsecurity and displacement that have stretched sanitation facilities beyond their capacity. Most cases were\nreported from Banadir, Togdheer, Lower Shabelle, Hiraan, Sool, Mudug and Lower Jubba regions. Reporting\nand verification in places such as Middle Juba have been hampered by access challenges. The current mass\npopulation displacement as a result of droughts is worsening the situation. The onset of the rainy season risks\nexacerbating the situation further in the hotspots and along the riverine areas.\n\n\n11. **According to preliminary results from an internal Rapid Drought Needs Assessment (RDNA) by WB**\n**staff, the drought is highly likely to cast widespread and lingering impacts across multiple sectors** . This\nassessment is based on a triangulation of secondary data [8] through remote-sensing techniques. These\npreliminary results suggest: (a) losses related to deceased livestock ranging between US$1.3 billion and\nUS$1.7 billion for the period of the drought; (b) additional losses in household wealth held in the form of\nlivestock assets ranging between US$4.3 billion and US$5.4 billion; [9] (c) losses in crop production of up to\nUS$60 million during the period of the drought; (d) further depletion of nominally functional water\nresources, over 50 percent of which are located within highly drought stressed areas; (e) forecasts of up to\n41,250 AWD/cholera cases including estimated 6,188 admissions by June 2017, and; (f) sharp increase in\ndisplacement.\n\n\n12. **The drought has resulted in more than 580,000** **newly displaced people between December 2016 and**\n**March 2017, mostly moving to urban centers in south and central Somalia.** [10] Massive drought-related\ndisplacement continues across Somalia, with most of the displaced people moving from rural to urban areas\nor other rural areas where they expect aid. The majority of new displacements are in Mudug, Bay and\nMogadishu. Drought-related displacement is occurring against the backdrop of ongoing conditions of\npoverty, vulnerability and protracted displacement. With over 1.1 million people (10 percent of the\npopulation) already internally displaced, new displacement, particularly to urban centres, is compounding\nexisting development deficits and strain the capacity of most communities.\n\n13. **Female-headed households and displaced women and girls are among the populations most**\n**vulnerable to the adverse impacts of the current drought.** In addition, the limited security in IDP\nsettlements, poor living conditions and lack of protection pose added risks of gender-based violence (GBV)\nand sexual exploitation to female IDPs. The separation of many women and children from community and\nfamilial support structures, as well as from traditional livelihoods activities, contributes to an increased\nreliance on marginal, inconsistent and hazardous livelihood strategies, which heighten poverty, food\n\n\n7 OCHA: Humanitarian Bulletin Somalia, May 4 2017\n8 The RDNA relies on the following sources of information: Drought Severity data was derived from ENDVI 10-year\nhistorical anomaly data based on LANDSAT 8 imagery. Displacement figures were derived from compiled IDP data\nfrom IOM, UN Habitat, UNHCR and local Ministries of Interior. Agriculture and livestock impact data heavily relied\non expert judgment and data from FAO FSNAU database (2011-2017), UNFPA 2014 population data and\nLANDSCAN 2015 population density. Cholera/AWD forecasts and data was derived from World Health Organization\n(WHO) data, reporting and forecasting analysis. Water resources data was derived from UN SWALIM and ICRC\ndatabases\n9 When these assets are priced at the prevailing depressed prices in the markets. The scenarios assume drought\neffect on grazing areas, disparities in household resilience to the effects of drought based on livelihood zone,\nwealth and coping mechanisms, as well as differences in adaptation of livestock to drought\n10 http://reliefweb.int/report/somalia/unhcr-somalia-drought-displacement-period-1-nov-2016-31-march-2017\n\n\nPage 14 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal Rapid Drought Needs Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8947693109512329,
+ "start": 140,
+ "end": 145
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "RDNA",
+ "confidence": 0.9828802943229675,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 147
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "secondary data",
+ "confidence": 0.9737420082092285,
+ "start": 181,
+ "end": 183
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.5571864247322083,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "AWD/cholera cases",
+ "confidence": 0.504936933517456,
+ "start": 314,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.8858593702316284,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ENDVI 10-year\nhistorical anomaly data",
+ "confidence": 0.5519894957542419,
+ "start": 617,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "historical anomaly data",
+ "confidence": 0.5530096888542175,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8713692426681519,
+ "start": 595,
+ "end": 596
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.9659802317619324,
+ "start": 599,
+ "end": 600
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "10-year",
+ "confidence": 0.5940638184547424,
+ "start": 618,
+ "end": 619
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 18
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\ninsecurity and exposure to violence.\n\n\n14. **The FGS has requested the World Bank to support the drought response.** In a letter dated 3 April 2017,\nthe FGS requested the WB’s financial support to provide emergency assistance for the victims of drought in\nSomalia. The WB responded immediately by considering an exceptional allocation of US$50 million from the\nInternational Development Association Crisis Response Window (IDA CRW) to mitigate the impacts on the\nmost vulnerable people and to lay a foundation for recovery and resilience in the drought-affected\ncommunities. Given its non-accrual status, Somalia is not eligible for IDA financing. Under these\ncircumstances, a single multi-sector program is proposed to be channeled directly through the UN,\ninternational non-governmental organizations (NGO) and humanitarian organizations for the benefit of\naffected communities rather than through the government. This implementation arrangement is the only\npossibility for the WB to engage in Somalia at this point, and the alternative of ‘non-engagement’ is not\nfavorable. This is reinforced by the findings and recommendations of the 2011 World Development Report\n(WDR) and the 2016 Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) review of WB engagement in fragility and conflict\nsituations. Hence, this is in line with the WB’s evolving global strategy of engaging early on in disaster and\ncrisis responses and providing support that cuts across the traditionally perceived divide of humanitarian and\nrecovery interventions. In addition, the growing Fragility, Conflict and Violence (FCV) agenda of the World\nBank combined with Somalia’s unique context, makes a strong case for the World Bank to engage in a\nsubstantial manner.\n\n\n15. **Consistent with this vision, and given the dire humanitarian crisis at hand, the proposed operation will**\n**entail:** a) a surge of high-impact, immediate response and early recovery interventions while humanitarian\noperations continue in tandem, and; b) a range of multi-sector, ‘livelihoods-centered’ activities that increase\ncoping capacity of the affected communities against the likely protracted impacts of the drought and\npromote a transition toward drought recovery and resilience building. This approach will strategically\naddress existing gaps and needs in the immediate and early recovery domains, while maximizing the World\nBank’s comparative advantage and value addition by making resilience building a key underpinning of the\ninterventions proposed to be financed under the operation. Given Somalia’s seasonal cycle, activities are\nspecifically designed to be synchronized with the rainy and dry seasons, and must be implemented in narrow\nwindows of opportunity in order to have an impact on food security and livelihoods.\n\n\n16. **Based on a needs and gaps analysis by the WB team, it is proposed that the Project will support the**\n**ongoing drought response operations of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the Food**\n**and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)** **[11]** . Both ICRC and FAO have considerable unmet\nfunding gaps in their present drought responses, to the tune of US$21 million and US$90 million respectively.\nThe importance of leveraging this partnership and providing an immediate flow of funds is necessary in the\ncontext of the operation in order to sustain existing momentum and scale up ongoing activities without\ncausing interruption to the drought response and recovery programs of both agencies.\n\n\n17. **Both organizations have a strong focus on rural populations and hard-to-access areas where**\n**vulnerability and food and water scarcity is acute, allowing the project to target some of the most**\n**vulnerable populations.** Beneficiaries will include IDP households and host households without adequate\naccess and capacity to cover essential food and non-food item needs, and pastoralists and agro-pastoralists\n\n\n11 This is also since the World Bank cannot fund the FGS given its non-accrual status, but due to the compelling\nhumanitarian situation, it has to find other means of supporting the severely drought affected people of Somalia\n\n\nPage 15 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 19
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nsuffering major or complete losses of their crops and livestock. The program will support vulnerable\nhouseholds and specifically target women and children through interventions such as treatment of\npregnant/lactating women suffering from acute malnutrition and management of severe acute malnutrition\nin under-5 children. Both ICRC and FAO will particularly take into account vulnerable populations while\ndetermining beneficiaries through collective action in order to ensure social inclusion.\n\n18. **ICRC has been established since 1863, and is one of the largest humanitarian organizations in the**\n**world with presence in over 80 countries.** Since its establishment, it has consistently received funding from\nvarious bilateral donors and is supported by numerous international partners. ICRC has been operational in\nSomalia since 1984, delivering assistance in partnership with the Somali Red Crescent Society (SRCS). [12] With\nregards to ICRC-driven activities in Somalia, the principles of neutral, independent, impartial humanitarian aid\nwill be respected in this process. Given its policy of neutrality and long track record of delivery, ICRC has\naccess to areas and communities where others do not, and thereby enabling timely support to the most\nvulnerable. In January 2017, ICRC started its drought response activities. Their multidisciplinary approach to\ndrought response, including elements of Economic Security (food, non-food and livelihood), Water and\nHabitat (water infrastructure, treatment, hygiene promotion and engineering), and Health (curative and\npreventive aspects at all healthcare tiers, nutrition), allows it to provide a holistic and integrated package of\nsupport to the drought affected communities. This multi-disciplinary capacity to respond also enhances\ntimeliness due to reduced transaction, consultation and coordination time.\n\n\n19. **Similarly, FAO is a partner of choice in the World Bank’s drought response based on its mandate and**\n**comprehensive Drought Response and Famine Prevention Plan for 2017**, which aims to provide both\nlifesaving interventions and emergency livelihood support as well as support to medium-term drought\nrecovery and resilience building. FAO's operational footprint extends across all regions of Somalia. It\nimplements a wide range of humanitarian and resilience-building interventions benefitting Somalia's farmers,\nagro-pastoralists, pastoralists and fishers, in addition to collecting, analyzing and disseminating high-quality\nand up-to-date information on food security, nutrition and natural resources. FAO’s approach to building\nresilient livelihoods in Somalia sequences, layers and integrates interventions that: (i) protect lives and\nlivelihoods against shocks and crises, (ii) increase sustainable, risk sensitive and nutrition-sensitive food\nproduction and consumption, (iii) create opportunities for income, employment and livelihood diversification,\nand; (iv) manage natural resources sustainably and equitably. Considering that FAO’s existing funding\narrangement with its donors is largely project-based and tied to specific drought response interventions,\nproviding programmatic WB support to FAO allows for significant flexibility for it to progressively attune its\nimmediate response, recovery and resilience interventions, depending on the changing ground situation visà-vis drought and rain conditions, and the evolving needs of the drought affected people. The proposed\nproject design stresses the importance of interventions that build long-term resilience, therefore raising the\nprofile of resilience as part of FAO’s ongoing drought response. Financing FAO to scale up its program will\nhelp address immediate needs of rural Somalis who are most vulnerable to the ongoing drought and famine\nrisks, while building resilience to withstand future shocks. A strong partnership is already in place between\nthe World Bank and FAO, which has enabled successful implementation of previous projects in Somalia. More\nrecently, this includes WB and FAO collaboration on the forthcoming Country Economic Memorandum on\nagricultural growth opportunities.\n\n\n12 Information regarding ICRC’s partnership with SCRCS is detailed in Annex 2\n\n\nPage 16 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5467981696128845,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8041520714759827,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable\nhouseholds",
+ "confidence": 0.8135403394699097,
+ "start": 32,
+ "end": 34
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.6371862292289734,
+ "start": 65,
+ "end": 66
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6147070527076721,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.872831404209137,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8424661159515381,
+ "start": 176,
+ "end": 177
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.5785521268844604,
+ "start": 231,
+ "end": 232
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought affected communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8778865337371826,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 306
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "comprehensive Drought Response and Famine Prevention Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.6011661887168884,
+ "start": 354,
+ "end": 361
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9782399535179138,
+ "start": 399,
+ "end": 400
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.5139463543891907,
+ "start": 362,
+ "end": 363
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.625356912612915,
+ "start": 362,
+ "end": 363
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "resilient livelihoods in Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5200198292732239,
+ "start": 450,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6733791828155518,
+ "start": 453,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought affected people",
+ "confidence": 0.6358135938644409,
+ "start": 578,
+ "end": 581
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.6990609765052795,
+ "start": 516,
+ "end": 517
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought affected people",
+ "confidence": 0.5736569762229919,
+ "start": 578,
+ "end": 581
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country Economic Memorandum on\nagricultural growth opportunities",
+ "confidence": 0.8356161713600159,
+ "start": 684,
+ "end": 691
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8229866027832031,
+ "start": 670,
+ "end": 671
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural Somalis",
+ "confidence": 0.9251351356506348,
+ "start": 625,
+ "end": 627
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 20
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n20. **World Bank Value Added.** The project will bring together a new multi-sector programmatic intervention\nto the ongoing multi-partner drought response in Somalia. This approach will strategically address existing\ngaps and needs in the immediate and early recovery domains, while maximizing the WB’s comparative\nadvantage and value addition by making resilience-building a key underpinning of the interventions financed\nunder the operation. The WB’s engagement has provided specific value addition to the FAO program by\nincorporating selected elements of FAO’s longer term resilience strategy [13] into the design of the FAO\ncomponent, which was previously not included in its current drought recovery program. These especially\ninclude the following subcomponent activities: (i) training community animal health workers, and connecting\nthem with veterinary associations; (ii) community level planning to prepare for and respond to drought, and;\n(iii) improved early warning and information systems. Hence the WB’s engagement has helped FAO in linking\nits drought program with its hitherto largely unfunded resilience strategy. Finally, a coordination mechanism\nwill be used to ensure aid harmonization and the avoidance of gaps and overlaps in response and early\nrecovery interventions. The WB’s engagement will be critical for quickly funding the existing funding gaps in\nICRC and FAO’s ongoing program. This will allow both entities to sustain the pace of their engagement and\nstrategically scale up their programs to cover critical geographic and thematic gaps. Hence, the project will\nbring significant added value as follows: (i) timely flexible financing for the supported partners; (ii) promoting\ncoordination amongst the supported partners, and strengthening capacity to do so; (iii) bridging the gap\nbetween emergency response and resilient recovery, and; (iv) potential to leverage additional trust funds to\nstrengthen government capacity to interface with ongoing coordination efforts.\n\n21. **The planned activities benefit from the World Bank’s global experience and an existing array of**\n**operations and analytics portfolio in Somalia.** Most notably these include: i) the Special Financing Facility for\nLocal Development project which aims to support the construction and reconstruction of infrastructure and\nthe development of public service delivery capacity in targeted areas of Somalia and support the Federal\nGovernment and Regional Administrations’ capacity to respond to an eligible crisis or emergency; ii) the\nSomalia Urban Resilience and Recovery Project (SURRP), which aims to increase resilience and absorptive\ncapacity through infrastructure and capacity building in key urban areas of Somalia; iii) the Water for Agropastoral Livelihoods Pilot Project that would improve pastoral and agro-pastoral communities’ access to, and\nmanagement of, small-scale water sources; iv) the Strengthening Somali Capacity for Disaster and Climate\nRisk Management initiative that supports Somaliland and Puntland governments to respond to climate\nevents; v) the Somali Resilient Multiple Use Water Services Project that aims to improve water security across\nSomalia by building the capacity of Somali regional governments to plan, deliver and monitor multiple-use\nwater supply services in conflict prone, arid environments; (vi) ICT Sector Support in Somalia Phase II that\nincludes support for a study on mobile money and links to another ongoing remittance project; vii) and the\nWorld Bank’s Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)-funded Inclusive Community\nResilience and Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Pilot that tests social and economic empowerment\ninterventions to increase resilience of vulnerable women to shocks. The ongoing and proposed drought\nresponse and resilience interventions contribute to the long-term resilience agenda.\n\n\n22. **It is also proposed to simultaneously raise additional trust fund resources and make use of the World**\n**Bank’s convening power to provide technical assistance at a programmatic level to various actors on**\n**developing and operationalizing a medium term and multi-sectoral drought recovery and resilience**\n**building framework.** Such a ‘Recovery Framework’ will enable the development of a systematic and\n\n\n13 FAO’s 3-year resilience strategy: “FAO Resilience Strategy 2017-2019: A New Resilience Strategy for a New\nSomalia”\n\n\nPage 17 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "early warning and information systems",
+ "confidence": 0.854284942150116,
+ "start": 182,
+ "end": 187
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6188759207725525,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "community animal health workers",
+ "confidence": 0.7090367078781128,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.684484601020813,
+ "start": 252,
+ "end": 253
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "supported partners",
+ "confidence": 0.5876376032829285,
+ "start": 316,
+ "end": 318
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "study on mobile money",
+ "confidence": 0.9495315551757812,
+ "start": 596,
+ "end": 600
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.852148175239563,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "pastoral and agro-pastoral communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5527102947235107,
+ "start": 497,
+ "end": 501
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought\nresponse and resilience interventions",
+ "confidence": 0.5491985082626343,
+ "start": 658,
+ "end": 663
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5158721804618835,
+ "start": 772,
+ "end": 773
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable women",
+ "confidence": 0.9084314107894897,
+ "start": 649,
+ "end": 651
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Resilience Strategy",
+ "confidence": 0.5799478888511658,
+ "start": 760,
+ "end": 763
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7828100323677063,
+ "start": 772,
+ "end": 773
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017-2019",
+ "confidence": 0.5902395248413086,
+ "start": 763,
+ "end": 764
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 21
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nintegrated approach for multi-sectoral recovery that ensures coordination of interventions among\nstakeholders, avoid gaps, minimize overlaps, improve service delivery and accountability, and establish\nrobust monitoring mechanisms. This proposed initiative will build upon the ongoing WB partnership with the\nUN through the UN/WB Trust Fund on the humanitarian-development nexus.\n\n\n23. **The proposed operation meets the emergency provisions of OP 10.00 Paragraph 12 (Projects in**\n**Situations of Urgent Need of Assistance or Capacity Constraints) of the World Bank’s Operational Manual**\n**and Guidelines and will be processed through condensed procedures provided therein.** The proposed\noperation is requesting deferral of social and environmental safeguards requirements to the implementation\nphase, and as required under such circumstances, a Safeguards Action Plan (SAP) has been prepared and\nincluded as part of the Project Appraisal Document (PAD).\n\n24. **Given the urgency, this operation has been designed to address the demands on the ground through**\n**fast-disbursing grants, making use of retroactive financing and advance payments to the supported**\n**partners, in line with the WB Agility agenda.** Such financing modalities will greatly assuage the immediate\ncash flow requirements of the supported partners and enable a quick scaling-up of ongoing emergency\ninterventions.\n\n\n_Table 1: Overview of MPF Portfolio_\n\n\nPage 18 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 22
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n25. **The WB is making use of the retroactive financing modality while remaining within the fold of the WB**\n**policies to sustain the pace and momentum with which ICRC is delivering immediate assistance to the**\n**drought-affected people.** The proposed financing of immediate assistance is in line with the WB’s evolving\nglobal strategy of engaging early on in disaster and crisis responses and providing support that cuts across the\ntraditionally perceived divide of humanitarian and recovery interventions. However, the project maintains an\noptimal balance between immediate and medium-term recovery given the critical status of the drought and\ngiven that a purely developmental operation is not possible at this time. Maximizing retroactive financing of\nthe ICRC Component of the Project is necessary to ensure that: a) ICRC is able to continue and scale up its\nemergency assistance to a critical and relatively more inaccessible and more vulnerable segment of the\ndrought affected population, and; b) the Project contributes towards averting and mitigating the risk of the\npresent drought elevating into a full-fledged famine situation by providing ICRC the means to bridge its\npresent funding gap of around US$21 million and thereby scale-up its program to supplement its support to\nits presently targeted communities as well as additional critically- affected populations. This would otherwise\nnot be possible without such additional, predictable and immediate (retroactive) support from the WB. Given\nthe urgency of the still unfolding food insecurity crisis, with the UN likely to double its appeal from US$865\nmillion to US$1.5 billion soon, the proposed retroactive financing will allow ICRC to meet its immediate cashflow requirements without interrupting the emergency response program and also widen its ongoing\nemergency interventions to deliver quick and efficient assistance to the drought-affected communities.\nMore details of the retroactive financing risk and mitigation modalities to be followed for ICRC are provided\nin Table 2. Furthermore, the World Bank Task Team has ensured that due diligence from a technical, fiduciary\nand safeguards perspective is carried out to only identify activities that are eligible for retroactive financing\nand which are compatible with the WB’s requirements and agreed with ICRC. It is possible that the amount\nretroactively reimbursed will be less than 100 percent, if not all expenditures are found to be eligible, in\nwhich case part of the ICRC component will be implemented subsequent to project effectiveness. The\napproval of the Project Decision Note on May 12 [th] 2017 endorsed the World Bank Task Team’s proposal for\nup to 100 percent retroactive financing of the ICRC component subject to the results of the reviews planned\nby the World Bank Task Team to validate the eligibility of the expenditures incurred by ICRC.\n\n26. **Risks and Mitigation Measures associated with the proposed retroactive financing to ICRC** . ICRC is a\nnew recipient of IDA financing. The task team has carried out the required due diligence within an\nabbreviated timeframe for the processing of the emergency Operation. Complete confirmation relating to\n\n\nPage 19 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 23
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\neligibility of the proposed retroactive financing to ICRC will be made prior to the withdrawal of the\nretroactive payments. For that reason, the team has built into the Project, specific conditions of withdrawal\nto ensure that the required due diligence is complete, appropriate measures are taken, and confirmations\nmade by the ICRC. Notwithstanding the inclusion of these conditions, the task team will carry out rigorous\ntechnical, fiduciary and environmental safeguards audits of the ICRC activities to verify the eligibility of the\nICRC expenditures that are expected to be retroactively financed. Further, based on a systematic risk analysis,\nthe task team has concluded that while the ICRC proposed retroactive financing may be up to 100 percent of\nthe ICRC grant, the exact percentage to be retroactively financed will be subject to, and depend upon the\nfindings of a detailed technical, fiduciary and environmental safeguards audit of the expenditures expected to\nbe retroactively financed. The amount of retroactive financing will only be determined on the basis of the\nfindings of such a detailed review. The full systematic analysis of risk and corresponding mitigation measures\nis provided in Table 2.\n\n\n_Table 2: Risk Analysis for the Proposed Retroactive Financing_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Risk|Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|**Technical**: There is a risk that the
activities
claimed
by
ICRC
for
reimbursement under the retroactive
funding arrangement are not entirely
compatible with the activities included in
the project description..|The WB’s technical experts involved in the preparation of the SEDRP
carried out the necessary due diligence reviews of the ICRC’s
multidisciplinary emergency response to drought and concluded that
maximizing retroactive funding to ICRC was a technically viable option.
The technical team was also satisfied with the ICRC’s implementation
arrangements for delivering the above emergency assistance. However,
the team will be conducting a detailed technical eligibility review of ICRC
expenditures proposed to be retroactively financed. Such a review will
entail and encompass every type of activity (i.e. typology) and
expenditure incurred by ICRC in the conduct of its drought assistance
program, and based on the findings of the review for each typology,
recommend the extent to which such expenditures should be
retroactively financed.|\n|**Environmental**
**Safeguards**:
The
key
environmental safeguards risk is that
adequate environmental due diligence
has not been carried out by ICRC in the
conduct of activities expected to be
retroactively financed under the project,
leading
to
possibly
adverse
environmental
impacts
from
such
activities.|The rigorous safeguards assessments conducted during project
preparation support maximizing retroactive financing of the ICRC
component, on the basis of the following findings: (i) ICRC has strict
procurement systems for assuring quality consumables for distribution;
(ii) ICRC has a strict medical waste management plan for the purchase,
transport, storage, use, and disposal of medicine which meets World
Bank safeguards requirements, and; (iii) Only a small part of one ICRC
sub-component, on specific water source rehabilitation or repair, will
need to be subjected to an environmental post-audit. The assessment
concluded that over 95 percent of expenditures under the ICRC
Component could be considered cleared from a safeguards standpoint.
For the remaining 5 percent of expenditures, a detailed environmental
post audit will be conducted to verify the eligibility of such activities for
consideration to be retroactively financed under the Project.|\n|**Procurement**: The key procurement
related risk is that ICRC may not have
conducted the necessary procurement
due
diligence
vis-à-vis
its
own|The project preparation mission concluded that maximizing retroactive
financing of the ICRC component was also supported from a procurement
perspective, with agreement on the use of ICRC procurement modalities
under the Alternative Procurement Arrangement (APA). For retroactive|\n\n\nPage 20 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 24
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|procurement standards and processes in
the conduct of activities being
considered for retroactive financing
under the Project.|funding, the procurement and safeguards team will further conduct a
post-review of technically eligible activities to be retroactively funded,
using the following approach: (a) a review of sample contracts used in
each of the expenditure categories, and; (b) for infrastructure contracts,
a review of sample designs, bill of quantities (BoQs) and specifications
specifically for borehole rehabilitation. The WB’s agreement on
retroactive financing will be subject to the following conditions: (i) a
review of service providers for contracts under the WB financed project
against the WB’s sanctions lists; (ii) record keeping for the procurement
files, which have been found to be acceptable, should be maintained in
such a way that they can easily be identifiable and can be reviewed
where they are located, and; (iii) ICRC will allow the WB to conduct
investigations on bidders/proposers/consultants, when necessary.|\n|---|---|\n|**Financial Management**: The key financial
management related risk is that ICRC
may not have conducted the necessary
due diligence vis-à-vis its own financial
management standards and processes in
the
conduct
of
activities
being
considered
for retroactive financing
under the Project.|The preparation mission concludes that ICRC has adequate FM
arrangements and systems to provide adequate assurance that the
proceeds of the grant is used for the intended purposes. On expenditures
submitted for retroactive financing, further risk based reviews will be
conducted to confirm that (a) the expenditures were processed in
compliance with the assessed internal controls; (b) Cash transfers and
other cash and non-cash items, the benefiting persons shall not be
persons of interest as outlined in the UN Debarred list, and; (c) the
expenditures are in conformity with the provisions of the WB policy on
retroactive financing.|\n\n\n27. **Subject to Board approval of the proposed financing modalities, SEDRP can possibly disburse up to 60**\n**percent (or US$30 million) in FY17 (i.e., by June 30).** This is designed to ensure continued momentum on the\nprovision of emergency assistance by ICRC and FAO by injecting more cash liquidity into their ongoing\nprograms. Further disbursements of US$13 million are expected between June-December 2017, which will\nlikely take expected cumulative disbursements by December 2017 to US$43 million (86 percent of the grants’\nproceeds). This will help in supporting and accelerating the transition from immediate assistance to more\nsustainable and resilient recovery. The remaining US$7 million (or 14 percent) will be disbursed between\nJanuary-June 2018, for activities focusing on recovery and resilience building.\n\n\n28. **Waivers and Exceptions Requested** . The following waivers are being sought from the IDA Board of\nExecutive Directors: (i) _Waiver for criteria related to eligible recipients for funding under the IDA CRW in order_\n_to allow FAO and ICRC to receive the respective grants out of the CRW_ . The CRW program in its design is\ngeared towards IDA sovereigns as recipients; (ii) _Waiver of application of the Anti-Corruption Guidelines_ for\nthe IDA Grant to FAO and a waiver to ICRC for the partial application of the Anti-Corruption Guidelines - a\nwaiver is sought of paragraph 20 of BP 10.00, which would otherwise require application of the World Bank’s\nAnti-Corruption Guidelines, in favor of relying on the fraud and corruption procedures of FAO; and (iii) _Waiver_\n_of the application of the IDA Commitment Charge_ _to the FAO and ICRC for the duration of the Project_ . The IDA\nPolicy, _IDA Commitment Charge for FY 2017_, issued and effective July 1, 2016, sets the Commitment Charge\nfor FY17 at zero percent. Given that the current Commitment Charge is zero percent and the expected\ntimeframe of the project disbursements is one year, the financial impact of this proposed waiver is expected\nto be negligible. In addition, the WB’s Regional Vice President approved, on May 8 [th] 2017, expenditures to\nfinance food under the project.\n\n\nPage 21 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 25
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n29. **The Board is requested to note that Management has considered and approved the above exceptions**\n**as of May 22, 2017..** Management has also endorsed the task team’s recommendation to permit IDA to\nretroactively finance up to 100 percent of expenditures of the ICRC grant. Since the setting-in of drought\nconditions over 2016, which peaked around October 2016, ICRC and other international aid agencies and\npartners began mobilizing and gearing up their support for the drought affected communities. Most such\ndrought response operations, including that of ICRC commenced around the beginning of 2017 and picked up\npace and scaled up over the intervening months leading to the present stage. Hence, it is proposed that\nexpenditures incurred by ICRC for its drought response activities since January 1 [st] 2017 [14] be retroactively\nfinanced through the proposed Project to the maximum possible extent. Given its present funding gap of\naround US$21 million, such retroactive financing will allow ICRC to continue and scale up its drought\nresponse program to the most affected and relatively more inaccessible drought affected communities,\nwhich would otherwise not be possible without such additional, predictable and immediate support from the\nWB. It is expected that the ICRC grant will be fully disbursed once the ICRC Financing Agreement is signed, to\nhelp sustain the pace of its emergency assistance program.\n**D. Sectoral and Institutional Context**\n\n\n30. **Somalia has undergone three protracted periods of drought and famine over the last 25 years.** During\nthe 1992 famine, upwards of 300,000 people died and 1 out of 5 Somalis was displaced. During the 2011 East\nAfrica Drought, 260,000 people died in Somalia; half of them children under the age of five. The UN termed\nthe 2011-12 drought as the \"worst drought in the last 25 years.\" The drought resulted in 920,000 Somali\nrefugees within the Horn of Africa and devastating economic losses to agriculture and livestock. It also\nbrought famine to the south of the country.\n\n31. **Despite the tremendous challenges faced over the last three decades and those still looming, the**\n**livestock and crops sectors remain the main sources of economic activity, employment and exports for**\n**Somalia.** Historically, the sector represented about 40-60 percent of the country’s GDP and its share has in all\nlikelihood grown substantially in recent decades. Improving the agricultural sector’s performance will not\nonly contribute to the country’s overall economic recovery and growth, but will also have important effects\non cementing peace and security, strengthening livelihoods, alleviating poverty and malnutrition, increasing\nresilience to increasingly frequent and severe weather shocks, and enhancing health outcomes in both rural\nand urban areas.\n\n32. **The current crisis is a result of several consecutive seasons of weak rains.** The “Deyr” rains between\nOctober to December 2016 were significantly below average resulting in well below average cereal\nproduction in the South. This has resulted in a significant depletion of water resources for agricultural\nconsumption, and particularly for livestock sustenance, that forms the backbone of the mainly rural\neconomy, accounting for about 65 percent of GDP and the vast majority of workforce employment. If the\nApril-June “Gu” rains are below average, famine (IPC 5) is likely, and across more territory than in 2011. [15]\n\n\n33. **The drought is causing large-scale crop failures and livestock deaths – impacting livelihoods and food**\n**supply.** The hardest-hit areas are in southern Somalia (Bay and Bakool) and the northern rangeland areas in\n\n\n14 The commencement date of the ICRC program will be further verified during the proposed technical audit of\nICRC’s retro-active expenditure\n15 Somalia: IDA Crisis Response Window. Emergency Support for Drought Response and Recovery\n\n\nPage 22 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC program",
+ "confidence": 0.616906464099884,
+ "start": 710,
+ "end": 712
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7431895732879639,
+ "start": 692,
+ "end": 693
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 26
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nPuntland. Due to scarce pasture and water resources throughout the country, livestock body conditions have\ndeteriorated substantially. In northeastern and central regions, livestock body conditions are very poor and\natypical livestock deaths have been reported in Northern Inland Pastoral, Hawd Pastoral, Addun Pastoral, and\nCoastal Deeh livelihood zones. In key agriculture production areas, crop yields are substantially below 19952015 averages. [16] Low demand for agricultural labor is driving wages down, while the prolonged water\nshortage has caused a spike in prices of basic goods and water. The drought has caused food production to\ndecrease, prices to rise, and wages to decline because of weak demand and declining purchasing power.\n\n\n34. **The Somali President is according the highest priority to an effective, efficient and preemptive**\n**response to address immediate needs and avert the famine.** The President took steps to strengthen the\nnewly created Ministry Humanitarian Response and Disaster Management, and has established national and\nregional Drought Response Committees responsible for coordination. He has made an allocation of\nUS$150,000 to each of the federal member states. The government has also committed to lift any barriers,\ntaxes or impediments to the international community’s response. However, Somalia’s institutions have\nlimited capacity to plan, coordinate or lead the effort. Weak federal government revenue mobilization and\nlimited intergovernmental fiscal transfers hinder the ability of the FGS to deliver such relief services to\ncitizens.\n\n\n35. **Although a number of bilateral donors and development partners have contributed and pledged**\n**resources to support the drought response, a sizeable financing gap exists to meet the urgent needs.**\nHowever, compared to recent humanitarian responses in various countries, the Somalia response is relatively\nwell resourced. ICRC has made a budget extension request for US$21 million due to the drought, which was\nun-funded at the time of writing of this report, and almost 70 percent of the United Nations’ (UN) US$863.5\nmillion appeal has been funded, with key gaps in Food, WASH, Protection and Health (this is detailed in Table\n3). [17] The UN appeal is likely to be nearly doubled to US$1.5 billion in the coming weeks. It may be noted that\nthese figures do not include the medium-term drought recovery and resilience needs, which are likely to be\neven higher.\n\n\n_Table 3: Funding by Cluster (US$ million) – Figures as of May 1_ _[st]_ _2017_\n\n|Sector|Required|Funded|Gap|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Food Security|399.7|210.4|189.3|\n|Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)|59.1|29.7|29.4|\n|Protection|95|13.4|81.6|\n|Enabling Programs|32.3|7.1|25.2|\n|Health|70.4|23.8|46.4|\n|Nutrition|109.5|74.3|35.2|\n|Shelter and NFIs|54.1|6.4|47.7|\n|Education|26.9|6.8|20.1|\n|Logistics|16.3|5.2|11.1|\n|**Total**|**863.3**|**377.1**|**486.2**|\n|Not yet specified|-|84.8|-84.8|\n|Funding not part of the appeal|-|133.4|-133.4|\n\n\n\n16 FSNAU: Somalia Food Security Outlook, February to September 2017\n17 OCHA: Financial Tracking Service, May 1st 2017\n\n\nPage 23 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 27
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**Total** **863.3** **595.24** **268.06**\n\n36. **While the international financing scale-up has been significant, the situation continues to deteriorate.**\nA further scale-up of funding is urgently needed – particularly for critical life-saving and livelihoods\nrestoration activities. Taking into account the current levels of humanitarian assistance, as well as the\npossibility of below average rainfall during the “Gu”, food insecurity is projected to deteriorate further\nthrough June, the end of the agro-pastoral lean season. With only a slight improvement predicted for July\nthrough September, this could result in a second additional appeal for humanitarian support. [18] The World\nBank’s involvement will not only help address this immediate response need but also help catalyze a\ntransition towards a more sustainable and resilient recovery, which is an area the WB has particular\ncomparative advantage, and where development partners have express their demand for the WB to engage.\n\n\n**E. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes**\n\n\n37. **The proposed project is aligned with the FGS’s National Development Plan (NDP),** **[19]** **that has a strong**\n**focus on tackling poverty and building resilience.** The project supports the FGS’s aim to create more resilient\ncommunities that can withstand internal and external shocks including cyclical droughts and other natural\ndisasters. The plan recognizes acute food insecurity as a “chronic feature” and identifies the role of food\nassistance in meeting the national food requirements. The NDP relies largely on the development assistance\nfrom the international community given the under-developed and poor socio-economic status of the country.\nThe project thus contributes to the ongoing efforts by international community to deliver critical services to\nthe Somali population most affected by the drought.\n\n38. **The proposed project is directly aligned with IDA’s planned support from the CRW for the region.** **[20]**\nThe plan highlights the need for a comprehensive approach for both short-term needs and medium to longterm resilience building in the region. In line with this approach, the project supports immediate recovery of\ndrought affected people of Somalia through provision of food assistance and restoration of livelihood\nopportunities in the medium-term, while helping avert famine and building resilience through sustainable\nrestoration of agro-pastoral production. The project also connects to priorities articulated within the Regional\nInitiative in Support of the Horn of Africa. [21] Pillar One of the Regional Initiative related to Vulnerability and\nResilience highlights the need to enhance the productive capacities and coping mechanisms of displaced\npopulations, in a way that promotes social cohesion and mitigates tensions.\n\n\n39. **The project is in line with the Interim Strategy Note (ISN) for the Federal Republic of Somalia (FY14-**\n**FY16)** . [22] The note supports sustainable poverty reduction in fragile and conflict-affected contexts, while\nhighlighting the need to address facets of vulnerability—including displacement—as a cross-cutting concern.\n\n\n18 OCHA: Somalia Humanitarian Dashboard, March 2017\n19 Federal Government of Somalia, National Development Plan, 2017-2019\n20 IDA Crisis Response Window Support for a Regional Drought Response in Africa and Middle East and North\nAfrica, IDA/SecM2017-0067, April, 2017\n21 WB-UN Horn of Africa Regional Initiative\n22 Interim Strategy Note; Report No. 75212 – SO; for the Federal Republic of Somalia; November, 11, 2013\n\n\nPage 24 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 28
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nThe ISN prioritizes strengthening core economic institutions and expanding economic activity. By supporting\nthe livelihoods of the drought affected population of Somalia, the project underpins these priorities. This is\nalso in line with the Systematic Country Diagnostic (SCD) which is due to be completed by the end of FY17.\n\n40. **The project promotes the achievement of the World Bank Group (WBG) twin goals through providing**\n**targeted emergency support to the poorest and most vulnerable segments of the population and promotes**\n**sustainable recovery and livelihood support to strengthen economic resilience and shared prosperity.** The\nProject will also support the WBG’s twin goals of eliminating extreme poverty and promoting shared\nprosperity. Somalia is one of the poorest countries in the world with an estimated 52 percent of the\npopulation living in poverty. [23] The Project will benefit these marginalized populations through provision of\nassistance and restoration of livelihood opportunities in the medium-term.\n\n\n23 Somalia: IDA Crisis Response Window. Emergency Support for Drought Response and Recovery\n\n\nPage 25 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 29
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**II.** **PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES**\n\n\n**A. PDO**\n\n\n41. **The Project Development Objective** of the Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project\n(SEDRP) is “to address the immediate needs of the drought affected people within the territory of the Federal\nRepublic of Somalia, and support resilient recovery through the provision of livelihood opportunities and the\nrestoration of agricultural and pastoral production.”\n\n42. **This objective will be achieved through:** (a) a surge of high-impact, immediate interventions while\nhumanitarian operations continue in tandem, and; (b) activities that transition toward medium-term\nrecovery via the reconstitution of productive assets, production capacity and livelihoods. The project will be\nimplemented by extending multi-sector support to the selected supported partners, FAO and ICRC, for scaling\nup and strengthening their ongoing programmatic interventions for drought recovery and resilience building.\n\n**B. Project Beneficiaries**\n\n\n43. **The project will directly benefit Somalia’s drought-affected population in the following manner:**\n\ni) Provide direct support for up to 523,000 people, including approximately 210,000 people\nwith food in kind, and up to 313,000 people with unconditional cash transfers.\nii) Support for up to 109,800 rural people (18,300 households) through FAO Cash-for-Work\nactivities and ‘Cash+’ interventions, which combine the provision of unconditional cash\ntransfers with emergency livelihood inputs to ensure families meet their immediate food\nneeds while restoring their own food production.\niii) Improved access to safe water for up to 656,000 people through rehabilitation of water\nsources, provision of water storage and treatment of water to avoid cholera and other\nwaterborne diseases.\niv) In addition, up to 225,000 households will benefit from livestock health (vaccination and\ntreatment) and nutrition support. In total, up to 8.5 million livestock will be reached with\nthe project.\n\n44. **An overall aggregation of all the beneficiaries listed above will not be possible since some of the**\n**beneficiaries will/may benefit from several interventions.** An aggregation will thus mean some double\ncounting. The Project has been designed using a flexible programmatic approach to adapt to the evolving\nenvironmental and security context during implementation. This is supported by the World Bank’s Agility\nAgenda; and the Results Framework will reflect this flexible approach by using target ranges for some of the\nindicators [24] .\n\n45. **The ICRC and FAO approaches to beneficiary targeting are differentiated, comprehensive and**\n**inclusionary** . Both of the supported agencies’ beneficiary selection processes are guided by continuous\nqualitative and quantitative gender needs analysis, that assess differentiated capacities and vulnerabilities of\nmen and women, as well as boys and girls, and tailor targeting and programming based on emerging findings\n\n\n24 This has already been done for other emergency projects, such as the recently Board-approved North East\nNigeria Multi Sectoral Recovery Project (MCRP)\n\n\nPage 26 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 30
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nto respond to these differences. Furthermore, beneficiary targeting criteria accounts for the distinct\nvulnerabilities of other vulnerable and displacement-affected groups, including minority clans, hosting\nhouseholds/communities or IDPs recognized by the host community, and returnees. Such differentiated\napproaches to targeting seek to mitigate the occurrence/recurrence of violence within, and between groups,\ndue to possible perceptions of aid programs privileging certain groups and not others, while also addressing\nthe gender dimensions of drought response and recovery, as well as the distinct vulnerabilities faced by\nminorities and displacement-affected persons.\n\n\n**C. PDO-Level Results Indicators**\n\n\n46. **The following outcome indicators will be used to measure progress towards the PDO:**\n\n - Number of people with improved food access.\n\n - Number of people benefiting from improved access to safe water.\n\n - Number of households with increased access to livelihood opportunities.\n\n - Number of households benefiting from livestock vaccination and/or treatment.\n\n\n**III.** **PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n47. **A programmatic approach is being adopted to fill each supported agency’s’ funding gap.** ICRC’s overall\ndrought response plan is budgeted at US$37.7 million until June 2017, which is part of its overall US$93\nmillion annual work program for Somalia. The remaining US$62 million covers both long-term oriented\napproaches and the emergencies related to conflict, violence, or punctual emergencies until end December\n2017. A budget extension of US$21 million was requested by ICRC to fund its drought response budget.\nSEDRP proposes to fund this programmatic gap for an amount of US$20 million, which will account for 95\npercent of the funding gap. In light of the expected 20-30 percent lower than average “Gu” rains, the\nemergency drought response plan will likely be extended beyond June. A situation assessment will be done\nend of May/early June as to confirm potential needs for additional budget if the drought conditions\ncontinue/worsen. This would include assessment of rain situation, conditions of the most-affected\ncommunities (by drought), presence and assistance capacity of other humanitarian actors. Similarly, FAO’s\nFamine Prevention and Drought Response Plan is US$160 million, of which there is a US$90 million funding\ngap. SEDRP will fund 1/3 [rd] or US$30 million of this funding gap.\n\n**A. Project Components**\n\n\n**Component 1 – Programmatic Support to ICRC for Immediate Drought Response, SDR14.6 million (US$20**\n**million equivalent)**\n\n\n48. **This component will support ICRC’s ongoing multidisciplinary response to immediate needs arising out**\n**of the country-wide impacts of the drought in Somalia.** This will help ICRC in continuing the pace and\nmomentum of its ongoing distribution [25] of food, non-food items and cash, and further scaling it up especially\nin hard-to-reach areas to promote food security and stem displacement. Support will also be provided for\ntreating malnutrition among children and pregnant/lactating women. Activities under this component will\n\n\n25 Such continuation of the ICRC program would not be possible if its existing funding gaps are not immediately and\nadequately addressed.\n\n\nPage 27 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "PDO-Level Results Indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.9595261812210083,
+ "start": 122,
+ "end": 125
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "measure progress towards the PDO",
+ "confidence": 0.5563730597496033,
+ "start": 139,
+ "end": 144
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7477174997329712,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought response plan",
+ "confidence": 0.5104134678840637,
+ "start": 231,
+ "end": 234
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8787776827812195,
+ "start": 261,
+ "end": 262
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7080529928207397,
+ "start": 245,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "situation assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.9451884627342224,
+ "start": 365,
+ "end": 367
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "most-affected\ncommunities",
+ "confidence": 0.5626024603843689,
+ "start": 403,
+ "end": 405
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Famine Prevention and Drought Response Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.6890090107917786,
+ "start": 424,
+ "end": 430
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.5204038619995117,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 31
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nalso help increase the availability of improved water for people in drought affected areas, by: repairing and\nrehabilitating water points; promoting good hygiene practices, and; providing water treatment materials\nespecially in areas with a high risk of cholera.\n\n\n49. **Sub-component 1.1 – Meeting Urgent Food Security Needs (US$13.9 million):** This sub-component will\nfinance the distribution of food and essential household items, especially in hard-to-reach insecure areas. In\nremote areas with depressed markets, the ICRC will distribute food rations comprising of rice, beans, Corn\nSoya Blend (CSB) and oil per household for up to two months. In areas with functioning markets, the ICRC will\nprovide unconditional cash (US$80-100 per HH/month) to households for purchasing food for up to three\nmonths to drought-affected people, particularly families of pregnant/lactating women and of children\nundergoing treatment for malnutrition. Other targeted vulnerable groups will include IDP households, host\ncommunities and rural communities of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists that have suffered major (over 50\npercent) or complete losses of their crops and livestock. The sub-component will also include distribution of\nnon-food items or “essential household items” (EHI) to drought affected populations in order to reduce their\nvulnerability and to maintain hygiene. The EHI kits would include jerry cans, plastic basins, shawls, tarpaulins,\nkitchen sets, fuel efficient stoves, mosquito nets and hygiene kits.\n\n\n50. **Sub-component 1.2 –** **Improving Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (US$3.6 million):** This subcomponent will scale up the ongoing ICRC activities aimed at reducing the disease burden faced by people in\ndrought-affected areas, which is also highly relevant to anticipated flooding in the upcoming rainy season.\nDisease prevention is through water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in drought-affected populations\nand health facilities. Water interventions include repair and rehabilitation of existing boreholes in areas with\npopulations under severe water stress. Where possible, these will also entail: (a) the deepening of hand-dug\nwells ; (b) providing extra storage and distribution for communities and their livestock; (c) water trucking as\nan option of last resort as a life-saving intervention; (d) unconditional cash grants to assist households with\nthe purchase of water (supplied through Sub-component 1.1), and; (e) hygiene promotion, household water\ntreatment (chlorine tablets) and mass water treatment targeting cholera and water borne disease\nprevention.\n\n\n51. **Sub-component 1.3 – Improving Access to Healthcare and Nutrition (US$2.5 million):** This subcomponent will support provisioning of emergency and primary health care for drought-affected populations\nat ICRC supported 25 fixed and 6 mobile health facilities, stabilization centers and cholera treatment centers\nin Kismayo and Baidoa. Interventions for health will include treating pregnant/lactating women suffering with\nacute malnutrition and management of severe acute malnutrition in under-5 children through: (i)\nprovisioning of curative care and rehabilitation, and; (ii) provisioning of supplementary food rations to\nprevent relapse and enable better recovery.\n\n\n52. **Sub-component 1.4 – Project Management:** Costs of project management are integrated within the\nsub-components that are executed by the ICRC. These include costs relate to: (i) needs and beneficiary\nassessments to inform project design; (ii) monitoring and evaluation of ongoing and completed activities,\nincluding the outsourcing of a Third-Party Technical Review of the same; (iii) technical designs for the\nrehabilitation of water infrastructure included under Sub-component 1.2 (access to safe water); (iv)\nsupervision quality control and contract management of components, and; (v) support and strengthen\nexisting grievance redressal system for beneficiaries.\n\n\nPage 28 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 32
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**Component 2 – Programmatic Support to FAO for Immediate Drought Response and Recovery, SDR21.9**\n**million (US$30 million equivalent)**\n\n\n53. **This component will support the FAO’s Drought Response and Famine Prevention Plan for 2017, with**\n**the objective of increasing immediate access to food, safeguarding livelihoods and assets, and supporting**\n**the sustainable recovery of agriculture, pastoral and agro-pastoral livelihood systems in target**\n**communities.** Interventions under this component are designed to help address the immediate food needs of\ndrought-affected households while also catalyzing recovery of productive assets, food production, and\nlivelihood systems. Interventions are also designed to simultaneously deliver short-term emergency relief\nand support the safeguarding and recovery of assets (infrastructure, inputs, skills, labor) that underpin longterm resilience of agriculture production and rural livelihood systems. This project component is designed\nwith built-in flexibility, offering a range of response options to be selected based on real-time needs and\npriorities on the ground, as they evolve. This will allow the project to adjust to seasonal requirements (linked\nto the agricultural calendar), needs and coverage by other partners, as well as fill critical gaps in assistance.\nAn indicative breakdown of WB financing across various sub-components is shown below.\n\n54. **Sub-component 2.1 – Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water Infrastructure**\n**Rehabilitation (US$6.63 million):** This sub-component will support the scaling up of FAO’s Cash-for-Work\nprograms which provide vulnerable households cash for immediate access to food water and assets and\nengage them for twelve weeks of paid work. Activities supported through the work may include restoring\nwater catchments, rehabilitating existing small secondary and tertiary irrigation canals, constructing contour\nbunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating\nwater harvesting and storage infrastructure. Beneficiaries will receive cash upon registration, equivalent to\ntwo weeks of paid labor. This front-loaded payment will enable families to improve their food intake\nimmediately, and will be on top of the 12 weeks of paid work. Households unable to participate in work\nprojects due to age, health, or other considerations will receive unconditional cash.\n\n\n55. **Sub-component 2.2 – Emergency Cash and Agricultural Livelihood Support (US$9.95 million):** This subcomponent will support the recovery of agricultural production systems and improve food access of riverine\ncommunities by supporting the scale up of FAO’s “Cash+” program. This program provides unconditional cash\ntransfers and livelihood inputs for families to meet their immediate food needs while restoring their own\nfood production (crop production or riverine fishing). This combination of assistance helps farmers and agropastoralists to restore their productive asset base through provision of seeds and other inputs, and prepares\nthem for the next growing season. By providing cash together with farming inputs, farming and agro-pastoral\nhouseholds will be able to cover their short-term food needs until crops can be harvested following current\nand upcoming crop cycles. In areas where well-functioning markets exist, voucher systems will be leveraged\nto stimulate demand and market-driven supply of needed inputs (seeds, fertilizers) and services (land\npreparation, irrigation pumps). The vouchers will be redeemable only at markets in the recipient’s home\ncommunity where they were settled prior to the drought, which will also help incentivize returns of displaced\npopulations. In addition, the program will target vulnerable households in riverine communities, by providing\nthe cash transfers alongside riverine fishing kits. Increasing fish consumption will enrichen diets with vital\nproteins, vitamins and micronutrients. This will diversify diets which otherwise tend to focus primarily on\ncarbohydrates.\n\n\n56. **Sub-component 2.3 – Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods (US$8.30 million):** To safeguard livestock\n\n\nPage 29 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 33
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nassets and pastoral livelihoods, this sub-component will support the scale up of FAO’s ongoing emergency\nlivestock interventions across Somalia. Animals in target areas will be vaccinated/treated against a variety of\ndebilitating diseases and conditions that threaten livestock productivity, value, health and survival.\nRangeland cubes will be provided to improve the health of animals. Training may be provided to increase the\nnumber of veterinary teams able to recognize signs of malnourishment and disease in livestock and provide\nappropriate treatments and vaccinations. Other interventions that will be supported under this component\ninclude restocking of small ruminants in the medium-term, once livestock health has improved and weather\nconditions are conducive. To increase overall availability of feed in drought and non-drought periods, this\nsub-component will provide assistance for cooperative and community level fodder production through the\nprovision of appropriate seeds and equipment for sowing, growing and harvesting fodder and training\nfarmers to increase overall fodder production.\n\n\n57. **Sub-component 2.4 – Strengthening Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and Early Warning Systems**\n**(US$1.66 million):** To improve the ability of vulnerable communities, government, and humanitarian and\ndevelopment partners to prepare for and respond to drought, this sub-component supports a range of\nactivities that will improve current and future drought response and famine prevention activities. Under this\nsub-component, vulnerable communities will be supported to develop community-level drought\npreparedness and response plans, weather monitoring and forecasting capabilities will be strengthened\nthrough the FAO’s existing water and land management information management system initiative\n(SWALIM), and the generation, management, and dissemination of early warning data will be improved\nthrough support of the Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU).\n\n\n58. **Sub-component 2.5 – Project Management (US$3.46 million):** This sub-component will finance the\nfollowing activities: (i) direct operating costs for project design and implementation, including technical\ndesign; community-based services; supervision and monitoring costs; rental of warehouses and office space;\nutilities and communication charges; (ii) direct operating costs for FAO, including independent Third-Party\nTechnical Review and evaluation as activities are ongoing and completed, including end of project evaluation;\nFAO’s overall management, operations and coordination of the project; supervision, quality control and\ncontract management of components; support for communications and information management systems;\ncoordination mechanisms to ensure complementarity with other partner activities and avoid duplication of\nefforts and enhance public relations; support and strengthening of existing grievance redressal systems for\nbeneficiaries; audits and studies to identify and mitigate potential adverse environment and social impacts\nand assessments required under various project components; and the incremental operating costs arising\nunder the project on account of vehicle operation for supervisors, monitors, and related travel costs and per\ndiems; and (iii) Indirect costs, or overall project servicing and administration costs.\n\n\n**B. Project Cost and Financing**\n\n\n59. **The financing instrument of the proposed Project is a grant-based Investment Project Financing with**\n**an operational life of 12 months.** It will be financed through grants of US$50 million equivalent from IDA to\nthe ICRC (US$20 million) and the FAO (US$30 million), as recipients and supported agencies of the proposed\nproject.\n\n60. **The following cost breakdown by sub-component is indicative, and within each component, flexibility**\n**and transferability of resources across sub-components will be allowed.** This will help the Project in\n\n\nPage 30 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Rangeland cubes",
+ "confidence": 0.8907649517059326,
+ "start": 68,
+ "end": 70
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8577965497970581,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "early warning data",
+ "confidence": 0.6284970641136169,
+ "start": 314,
+ "end": 317
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "weather monitoring and forecasting capabilities",
+ "confidence": 0.6021232008934021,
+ "start": 279,
+ "end": 284
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5392519235610962,
+ "start": 289,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable communities",
+ "confidence": 0.9331132769584656,
+ "start": 223,
+ "end": 225
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "communications and information management systems",
+ "confidence": 0.6186425089836121,
+ "start": 454,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.590650737285614,
+ "start": 488,
+ "end": 489
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievance redressal systems",
+ "confidence": 0.5974929332733154,
+ "start": 484,
+ "end": 487
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cost breakdown by sub-component",
+ "confidence": 0.8437344431877136,
+ "start": 643,
+ "end": 647
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 34
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nadapting to any evolving patterns of drought and changes in the security context of the affected regions\nduring project implementation. “Overhead” or “Project Servicing” Costs of 6.5 and 7 percent for ICRC and\nFAO, respectively, are factored into the below component costing table.\n\n\n_Table 4: Project Components Costing Table_\n\n\n**Project Components** **IDA Financing**\n\n\n**Component 1: Programmatic Support to ICRC for Immediate Drought Response** **20**\n\n\n1.1 Meeting Urgent Food Security Needs 13.9\n\n\n1.2 Improving Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 3.6\n\n\n1.3 Improving Access to Healthcare and Nutrition 2.5\n\n\n1.4 Project Management \n\n**Component 2: Programmatic Support to FAO for Immediate Drought Response and Recovery** **30**\n\n\n2.1 Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water Infrastructure Restoration 6.63\n\n\n2.2 Emergency Cash and Agricultural Livelihood Support 9.95\n\n\n2.3 Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods 8.30\n\n\n2.4 Strengthening Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and Early Warning Systems 1.66\n\n\n2.5 Project Management 3.46\n\n\n**Total Costs** **50**\n\n\n**C. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design**\n\n\n61. **International experience working in drought and famine response indicates there is the need to link**\n**relief, recovery and development efforts** . In this respect, the project design supports immediate responses\nto avoid the deterioration of the food security situation of the most vulnerable people (distribution of food\nrations and nutritional support) and medium-term recovery to help populations increase their food security\n(e.g. boosting production via seeds, tools, etc.). This is especially important in Somalia, a country that faces\nrecurrent episodes of food and nutrition insecurity.\n\n62. **International experiences also suggest that the speed of the World Bank’s project preparation and**\n**implementation is of the essence**, allowing it to respond to urgent needs and reduce the immediate impact\nof crisis disaster, while providing the impetus to accelerate more sustainable and resilient recovery.\n\n63. **Lessons from WB operations in other countries like South Sudan, North-East Nigeria, Democratic**\n**Republic of Congo and Yemen, as well as ongoing projects in Somalia have been considered.** The project\nintegrates measures to avoid aggravating conflict as a consequence of the project interventions, while also\naddressing the drivers of conflict. For example, recovery interventions with emphasis on community\nconsultation and participation have proven to help support social cohesion and foster inclusion of\n\n\nPage 31 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "component costing table",
+ "confidence": 0.85709547996521,
+ "start": 66,
+ "end": 69
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6654328107833862,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and Early Warning Systems",
+ "confidence": 0.54511958360672,
+ "start": 214,
+ "end": 222
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable people",
+ "confidence": 0.6723644733428955,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Project Design",
+ "confidence": 0.7292963862419128,
+ "start": 254,
+ "end": 256
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable people",
+ "confidence": 0.7198684215545654,
+ "start": 312,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 35
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nmarginalized groups, including women, displaced populations and minority clans. Experiences worldwide\nsuggest that consultations with, and participation of, target beneficiaries have both instrumental benefits\n(better needs assessments and improved efficiency) and value-based benefits (empowerment of affected\ncommunities). The Project thereby will employ consultative approaches for determining beneficiaries, and in\nimplementing other aspects of the project in collaboration with local stakeholders, district-level authorities\nand civil society organizations.\n\n\n64. **World Bank experience in responding to disasters has established the sustainability of multi-sectoral**\n**disaster recovery, combined with a comprehensive spatial approach.** Single-sector focused responses have\nnot been proven effective to deliver lasting results. The systematic planning of multi-sectoral recovery\ninterventions enables coordination among the different actors involved, defines clear roles and\nresponsibilities, and allows for establishing a comprehensive monitoring mechanism for recovery.\nComplementarity of programs like agriculture, livelihood, irrigation, catchment and water management\nprovide holistic disaster recovery. Combined with this, geographical coordination and alignment of actors,\nand associated needs, through a coordinated programmatic approach will ensure that the program supports\nactivities in locations where the needs are greatest.\n\n\n65. **The project also draws on experience from the Malawi Drought Recovery and Resilience Project**\n**(MDRRP),** which also included a large retroactive, quick disbursing component, supported the World Food\nProgram to distribute food and signified the World Bank’s strategic shift towards providing support that cuts\nacross the perceived humanitarian-recovery-development divide. This operation averted another food crisis\nin 2017. Another key lesson learnt from MDRRP that has been applied to the design of this project is the need\nto take a balanced and optimal resource allocation approach across early and medium term recovery – in the\ncase of the MDRRP, there was a 50:50 split between immediate emergency assistance and medium-term\nrecovery. A similar 60:40 balance is proposed for the SEDRP across emergency and medium term\ninterventions.\n\n\n66. **Cash-for-Work interventions are increasingly being used by the World Bank as a viable tool to respond**\n**to disasters** . Cash-for-Work activities are intended to simultaneously achieve two objectives: i) immediately\nenable households in crisis to meet their basic food needs, and, ii) to build or rehabilitate productive assets\nthat make households and communities more resilient to drought, floods and other risks. [26] Employment\nopportunities generated by Cash-for-Work programs enable many individuals who would otherwise be forced\nto migrate by emergency of conflict to remain in their homes and preserve their communities and families. [27]\nThese provide assistance not only in the form of household income but also allow rehabilitation of damaged\ncommunity assets. Moreover, Cash-for-Work programs also empower individuals by providing them with a\ndegree of choice with regard to their spending priorities. [28]\n\n\n26 Somalia Country Programming Framework, FAO, 2014 - 2017\n27 Guide to Cash-for-Work Programming, Mercy Corps\n28 Oxfam, Cash-For-Work Programming, June 2002\n\n\nPage 32 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5610302090644836,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5881159901618958,
+ "start": 3,
+ "end": 5
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5849042534828186,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Malawi Drought Recovery and Resilience Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6324179768562317,
+ "start": 240,
+ "end": 246
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "MDRRP",
+ "confidence": 0.513323187828064,
+ "start": 251,
+ "end": 252
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Malawi",
+ "confidence": 0.5696656703948975,
+ "start": 240,
+ "end": 241
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.5398094654083252,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "MDRRP",
+ "confidence": 0.9016170501708984,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 310
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.7193364500999451,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.5904571413993835,
+ "start": 371,
+ "end": 372
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Cash-for-Work programs",
+ "confidence": 0.793141782283783,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 466
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8151352405548096,
+ "start": 541,
+ "end": 542
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 36
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**IV.** **IMPLEMENTATION**\n\n\n**A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n_**Institutional Arrangements**_\n\n\n67. **SEDRP implementation arrangements will utilize the existing structures of the supported partners –**\n**ICRC for Component 1 and FAO for Component 2.** SEDRP will also operate within the program level\ncoordination framework for the overall multi-partner immediate drought response, considering the need for\na nimble light touch. Some project-specific functions for oversight and coordination will also be established\nas required.\n\n\n68. **Informal Apex-Level Consultative Mechanism** . An informal apex-level group – with the World Bank\nSomalia Country Representative, the ICRC Head of Delegation, and the FAO Country Representative – will\ncoordinate on the overall progress for their respective activities. Regular coordination will be maintained\nwith Somalia’s Ministry of Humanitarian and Disaster Management to align with the overall drought response\nand recovery program led by the Government. Similar coordination will be maintained with the UN\nhumanitarian and early recovery programs, on an as need basis. The Informal Apex-Level Consultative\nMechanism will link the project with the UN team coordinating “Economic Recovery” from the drought,\nincluding the UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator and the United Nations Development Program\n(UNDP) Country Director.\n\n\n69. **Technical Working Group (TWG).** A Technical Working Group (TWG) will support the Apex structure by:\na) providing updates on progress and results; b) informing of project challenges and risks, and; c) providing\nrecommendations to resolve any issues. The TWG is composed of the ICRC and FAO _focal points_ for SEDRP,\nand will be supported by the World Bank Task Team for the Project. The TWG is the primary mechanism for\noperational coordination at the program and district levels across the ICRC and FAO components.\n\n\n70. **Role of FAO and ICRC Focal Points for SEDRP** . FAO and ICRC will designate _focal points_ for SEDRP,\nresponsible for central coordination and reporting for their respective components, via the TWG. The focal\npoints will serve as a single point of contact to the apex structure; and with the World Bank Task Team for\noperational matters including but not restricted to: a) coordination across and within project components; b)\nquality assurance and process oversight; c) progress and results reporting; d) management of Third-Party\nTechnical Review firm (for FAO component only); e) identification and preparation of interventions and\nprogressive preparation of component work plans; f) procurement of goods, works and services (and seeking\nof World Bank no-objections if necessary); g) contract management oversight and control of outsourced\nactivities; h) technical certification and quality assurance of the work of contractors and supported partners;\ni) facilitating financial and M&E reporting to the WB, and; j) monitoring of, and reporting on, social and\nenvironmental safeguards compliance, including maintaining grievance redress mechanisms.\n\n\n71. **Resources for FAO and ICRC Implementation and Coordination** . The project includes resources for FAO\nand ICRC to complement their respective implementation and coordination roles. These resources can\nfinance upfront or progressively determined capacity enhancement needs. FAO will receive resources under\nthe Project to enhance its overall coordination of various partners and stakeholders falling under the Food\nSecurity Cluster.\n\n\nPage 33 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.8126684427261353,
+ "start": 50,
+ "end": 51
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9480156898498535,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TWG",
+ "confidence": 0.7607873678207397,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank Task Team",
+ "confidence": 0.6706754565238953,
+ "start": 334,
+ "end": 338
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.5079441070556641,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5693151950836182,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 37
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n72. **Operational Coordination and Harmonization across FAO and ICRC Components and beyond** . Project\ncoordination will be maintained at the program, HQ, and field levels between ICRC and FAO. Coordination\nwill focus on: (i) spatial elements, to avoid coverage gaps and overlaps; (ii) programming and timing of the\nrespective responses of various agencies to maximize effectiveness and complementarities; (iii)\nharmonization of the support packages across various project sub-components, and alignment of targeting\nmechanisms, (iv) synchronized reporting on component progress, results and processes, and; (iv) progressive\ndetermination and resolution of any jointly faced, or coordination-specific, issues and challenges.\n\n\n73. **The proposed project would be financed by an IDA grant to the FAO through the application of the**\n**2008 WB and UN Financial Management Framework Agreement (FMFA).** The project’s financial\nmanagement arrangements will be governed by the FMFA between the World Bank and the UN agencies,\nwhich provides for the use of the UN’s Financial Regulations. The proposed project would also be financed by\nan IDA grant to the ICRC. AS FMFA is not applicable to ICRC, FM assessments were conducted regrading\ncompliance with WB guidance for emergency operations and financial management. The assessments\nconcluded that the WB can rely on the existing ICRC FM arrangements to implement part of the Project,\ncomplemented by the project-specific risk mitigation measures. In addition, the WB shall rely on ICRC Internal\ncontrol procedures, that will be complemented by the WB’s periodic FM implementation support\nsupervision.\n\n**B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n74. **Monitoring and Evaluation.** The ICRC and FAO will be independently responsible for their own program\nmonitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the Project, using the Project’s results framework to issue quarterly\nupdates on the overall project implementation and results. The ICRC and FAO will be responsible to set up a\nResults Monitoring System that will allow to report on the Results Framework and any related outcome and\nimpact information for the project.\n\n\n75. **The Results Monitoring System for ICRC will include data from each sector: Economic Security**\n**(EcoSec), Water/Sanitation, and Health.** The monitoring system has a two-pronged approach: 1) the internal\ndata collection and analysis by the EcoSec team through regular field assessment visits and market survey\nthat is conducted in 14 regions on a monthly basis; 2) the exchange with the relevant stakeholders such as\nSRCS, communities, local associations and NGOs, different governmental authorities at the field and central\nlevel, the UN led Food/Nutrition and Shelter clusters at the regional and central levels, including specialized\nagencies and projects such as FSNAU and Famine Early Warning Network (FEWS NET). ICRC will submit to the\nWB technical reports on the project activities and progress. The bi-annual report includes the interim\nreporting format that is currently being used to report to other donors. In addition, ICRC will also provide an\nend of project report including information on achievements and impacts, which will be based on M&E tools\nused by ICRC. Use of a limited Third-Party Technical Review (TPTR) to complement ICRC M&E due diligence\non the project results and processes will also be considered.\n\n\n76. **Currently FAO M&E conducts multiple impact assessment studies for the project they implement** :\nBaseline Surveys, Post-Distribution Assessments and Impact Assessments. The Baseline Surveys, conducted\nregularly, will employ a hybrid approach that uses FAO Field Monitors (currently about 15 across Somalia)\nand independent consulting firm as a Service Provider which is contracted and overseen by FAO. The use of\n\n\nPage 34 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FM assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9618399143218994,
+ "start": 242,
+ "end": 244
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Results Monitoring System",
+ "confidence": 0.943716287612915,
+ "start": 389,
+ "end": 392
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "14 regions",
+ "confidence": 0.6967156529426575,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "market survey",
+ "confidence": 0.8638120889663696,
+ "start": 474,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6724973320960999,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "14 regions",
+ "confidence": 0.768122673034668,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 482
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "end of project report",
+ "confidence": 0.616005539894104,
+ "start": 592,
+ "end": 596
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.5199329853057861,
+ "start": 595,
+ "end": 596
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Baseline Surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.922247052192688,
+ "start": 667,
+ "end": 669
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8455953001976013,
+ "start": 698,
+ "end": 699
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 38
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nout-sourcing contractor will increase the study access by reaching districts that are inaccessible to FAO staff\nand by reaching more locations and households for studies that require a relatively high sample size. An\nImpact Assessment [29] to evaluate the project will be conducted once all data has been analyzed, programs\nimplemented and results validated by FAO Somalia. In addition to the above robust M&E system, the project\nwill deploy an independent TPTR to assess overall project implementation and impact. The Terms of\nReferences (ToRs) will be developed and agreed upon with FAO Somalia. The TPTR will be hired and managed\nby FAO in line with the TORs and the reports will be shared with the WB, and will include actions taken to\naddress implementation issues identified by the TPTR. In addition, FAO will submit to the WB technical\nreports on the project activities every three months via an agreed upon template.\n\n\n**C. Sustainability**\n\n\n77. **The proposed set of interventions incorporate measures for fostering long-term resilience building**\n**and strengthening the capacity of the country to cope with natural disasters over the medium term.** The\nProject supports the sustainable recovery of agriculture livelihood systems in target communities, and\nthrough its Cash-for-Work interventions it also will finance the restoration of water catchments and\nrehabilitation of irrigation canals among other water infrastructure.\n\n\n78. **Project implementation will be synchronized with the Somali seasonal cycle, and will engage people in**\n**work in the lead up to “Deyr” rains and the planting season (i.e. June-September), and potentially extend if**\n**the 2017 rains fail.** Simultaneously, the project provides unconditional cash transfers plus emergency\nlivelihood inputs so families can not only meet their immediate food needs but also restore their own food\nproduction. This combination of assistance helps farmers restore their productive asset base with the\nprovision of seeds and other inputs, preparing them for the next growing season. The Project further\ncontributes to sustainability through livestock protection interventions such as provision of range feed cubes\nand livestock treatment and vaccinations, and support to farmers to increase fodder production before the\nrains. Drought preparedness and response plans will also be developed at the community level, improving\nthe resilience of communities to the ongoing and future natural hazards.\n\n\n79. **The principles of resilient recovery and build-back-better are integrated throughout the project**\n**activities, especially related to Component 2, implemented by FAO.** To help increase access to fodder,\nespecially during the dry season, the project will support the development of commercial fodder production.\nCash-for-work programs under this project will emphasize the rehabilitation or construction of new water\nmanagement systems that are critical to community and livelihoods recovery.\n\n**D. Role of Partners**\n\n\n80. **This Project has been designed following an inclusive multi-stakeholder and multi-partner process.**\n**The project team worked closely with FAO and ICRC to inform and design the project components, to**\n**ensure complementarity, geographical and programmatic harmonization.** Whereas the ICRC will deliver\nimmediate food, water and cash response to the drought affected population, FAO will provide livelihood\n\n\n29 FAO’s impact assessment report shall present a detailed evaluation, which includes key data such as a Food\nConsumption Index, the dietary diversity score and the increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU). Data collection\nwill use the RIMA-based questionnaire (RIMA – Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis)\n\n\nPage 35 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Impact Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8574413061141968,
+ "start": 51,
+ "end": 53
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8395310640335083,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "M&E system",
+ "confidence": 0.5691846609115601,
+ "start": 85,
+ "end": 89
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TPTR",
+ "confidence": 0.618398129940033,
+ "start": 96,
+ "end": 97
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "technical\nreports",
+ "confidence": 0.5491344928741455,
+ "start": 169,
+ "end": 171
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WB",
+ "confidence": 0.9199835658073425,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 169
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "agriculture livelihood systems",
+ "confidence": 0.730809211730957,
+ "start": 237,
+ "end": 240
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "target communities",
+ "confidence": 0.5282099843025208,
+ "start": 241,
+ "end": 243
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Drought preparedness and response plans",
+ "confidence": 0.9340847730636597,
+ "start": 422,
+ "end": 427
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.6003581881523132,
+ "start": 479,
+ "end": 480
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "communities",
+ "confidence": 0.7953000068664551,
+ "start": 440,
+ "end": 441
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "impact assessment report",
+ "confidence": 0.7184918522834778,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6030579209327698,
+ "start": 622,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.6309824585914612,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 613
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought affected population",
+ "confidence": 0.7475166320800781,
+ "start": 608,
+ "end": 611
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RIMA-based questionnaire",
+ "confidence": 0.6918225884437561,
+ "start": 660,
+ "end": 662
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 39
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nsupport and promote resilient recovery. Additionally, the United States Agency for International\nDevelopment (USAID) and the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) are also\nsupporting FAO’s drought programs. Both organizations also provided useful feedback to the World Bank\nTask Team, and the proposed WB operation will continue to be closely coordinated with USAID, DFID and\nother bilateral donors supporting the same programs. The World Bank Task Team also coordinated with\nseveral other partners including the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA), the\nInternational Organization for Migration (IOM), FSNAU, SWALIM and the World Health Organization (WHO),\nthat have been instrumental in providing information on drought impact and needs linked to the relevant\nsectors, as well as sharing their own assessments, projections and intervention strategies.\n\n\n81. **Additionally, UN OCHA provided baseline on IDP presence throughout the country which facilitated**\n**geospatial mapping and cross-correlation of data with IOM/UN Human Settlements Programme (UN**\n**HABITAT) statistics on IDP flows.** The IOM provided information on population displacement and IDP\nmonitoring and analysis. FSNAU’s livelihoods baseline and household-to-livestock ratios as well as expertbased judgements on expected livestock activity enabled the quantification of livestock and associated losses\nin Somali livestock industry.\n\n\n82. **SWALIM’s data on strategic water resources in Somalia and remote assessment results helped better**\n**understanding the drought's impact on water resources and associated effects on population and livestock.**\nThe AWD/Cholera outbreak data from WHO has allowed for better targeting of intervention strategies as well\nas understanding of where drought, malnutrition and disease concerns are likely to jointly manifest\nthemselves.\n\n\n83. **Project implementation will also follow an inclusive and consultative process with the relevant**\n**partners and stakeholders, including government, through an informal coordination mechanism.** This will\nhelp ensure close strategic harmonization and operational coordination across the inter-related interventions\nimplemented by FAO, ICRC and multiple other humanitarian and development partners. The Project will also\nprovide support to FAO to further strengthen its coordination and harmonization of the Food Cluster\nactivities and partners in Somalia.\n\n\n**V.** **KEY RISKS**\n\n\n**A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks**\n\n\n84. **The overall risk for achieving the PDO is substantial.** The rating for each category is listed in Table 5,\nwith explanations underneath for the substantial and high risks.\n\n\nPage 36 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IDP presence",
+ "confidence": 0.6481891870498657,
+ "start": 183,
+ "end": 185
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "geospatial mapping and cross-correlation of data",
+ "confidence": 0.6072449684143066,
+ "start": 194,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6878657937049866,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "AWD/Cholera outbreak data",
+ "confidence": 0.7718360424041748,
+ "start": 309,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WHO",
+ "confidence": 0.5576019883155823,
+ "start": 315,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8556933403015137,
+ "start": 278,
+ "end": 279
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Table 5",
+ "confidence": 0.5993757843971252,
+ "start": 481,
+ "end": 483
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "rating for each category",
+ "confidence": 0.7034759521484375,
+ "start": 474,
+ "end": 478
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5678554773330688,
+ "start": 429,
+ "end": 430
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 40
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_Table 5: Overall Risk Rating_\n\n|Risk Categories|Rating (H, S, M or L)|\n|---|---|\n|1. Political and governance|H|\n|2. Macroeconomic|L|\n|3. Sector strategies and policies|L|\n|4. Technical design of project|M|\n|5. Institutional capacity for implementation and sustainability|S|\n|6. Fiduciary|H|\n|7. Environmental and social|M|\n|8. Stakeholders|M|\n|**Overall**|**S **|\n\n\n\n85. **Political and governance risks are rated high.** The planned activities under both components face high\npolitical and governance risks. Activities are proposed to be delivered in areas controlled or heavily\ninfluenced by Al-Shabaab. Delivery of humanitarian aid in those areas is difficult and access is facilitated on\nan ad hoc basis. Lack of government presence, a volatile security situation, and the ongoing anti-terror\ncampaign can restrict access and the delivery of support, as was the case in the last drought. Furthermore,\nthe nature of project interventions, targeting criteria and geographical coverage are also considered\npolitically sensitive. Expectations around equity in particular between the various interim FMS will need to be\nmanaged through the project coordination mechanisms. Grievance redress mechanisms of the supported\npartners have been appraised and have been deemed satisfactory to identify perceived bias in access or\ndelivery in the affected communities. Remote sensing will further triangulate information from hard to access\nareas for the project to ensure a common understanding of the most affected locations and communities.\nThe Project will establish frequent coordination meetings with the supported partners to ensure effective\ninformation flow. Furthermore, the project will maximize opportunities for policy and coordination\nengagement with relevant government partners on the federal and federal member state level, i.e. the newly\nestablished Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster Management, and the Drought Operational\nCoordination Committees.\n\n\n86. **Risk related to institutional capacity is rated substantial.** The environmental and security challenges\nand frequent mobility of the population fleeing drought-hit and conflict-affected areas may compromise the\nability of FAO and ICRC to adequately identify eligible potential beneficiaries. Hence the project’s institutional\ncapacity is rated as substantial. This risk will be mitigated by using a flexible programmatic approach to adapt\nto the evolving environmental and security context during implementation, and targeting will be\ncontinuously informed through coordination of actors through the Food Security Cluster, remote sensing and\nmonitoring, and collaboration with agencies regularly tracking the movement of IDPs throughout Somalia.\n\n\n87. **The project fiduciary risk is rated high.** This is largely attributable to a) country specific weak/ evolving\nrudimentary funds flow and banking systems particularly at the implementation level in Somaliacharacterized by Anti Money Laundering (AML) and Anti-Terrorism Financing (ATF) risks; b) inadequate FM\ncapacities at the community level to spent and account for the funds correctly and on timely basis; c) limited\naccess to the project sites at the local level due to security constraints; d) potential beneficiaries inclusion\nand exclusion errors in the context of the emergency situation. Proposed on-going measures to mitigate the\n\n\nPage 37 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 41
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nidentified risks include: i) strengthening the existing beneficiaries identification and enrolment systems\nthrough use of biometric systems as a way of identifying beneficiaries at enrolment and payments checkpoints; ii) strengthening the existing framework agreements with third party Payment Service Providers (PSP)\nto facilitate delivery of payments and services, in particular practical measures to minimize liquidity\nchallenges; iii) deployment of Third Party Review arrangements complemented by field based community\nmonitors– centrally managed through FAO for ease of coordination; iv) allocation of requisite funding to\nstrengthen the existing FAO and ICRC Internal Risk Management Frameworks (particularly FAO Automated\nCall Centre) to cope with rapid scale up. The proposed risk mitigation measures are aimed at strengthening\nFAO and ICRC’s institutional capacity and improving systems and procedures. The conclusion of the\nassessment is that the existing FAO and ICRC FM arrangements complemented by the project specific risk\nmitigation measures are adequate to support the operation. Given the high risk operating environment, the\nWB’s fiduciary team will work closely with FAO and ICRC fiduciary teams to support and strengthen the\nproject implementation and FM arrangements particularly in monitoring and addressing the outlined/\nemerging risks during implementation.\n\n\n88. **Technical design and sustainability risk.** The coming “Gu” rains have been delayed, and are likely to be\n20-30 percent below average, with pockets of rainfall as much as 25-50 percent below average along the\nsouth. Given the forecast for average to below-average April to September rainfall in the Ethiopian highlands,\nwhich feeds in to the Shabelle River, and below average “Gu” rains, river water levels are expected to remain\nlower than normal from April through September. This will result in lower than normal irrigation planting. [30] In\nthe long-run, bigger climate shifts are anticipated. The expected mean annual temperature is projected to\nincrease by 1°C to 3°C (by 2050) in all areas of Somalia. [31] In terms of precipitation, by 2050 and beyond, it is\nprojected to increase across the country, in particular during the October-November-December months. [32]\nWhile the majority of the project is focused on immediate and medium-term recovery of a major climate\nshock, the project is also striving to build resilience of communities to mitigate the impact of climate\nvariability and to strengthen drought forecasting services. Activities include enhancing water retention and\nmanagement infrastructure, drought preparedness and response plans at the community level; supporting\nimproved data collection and analytical capacities of FSNAU, SWALIM, and FEWSNET; capacity development\ntrainings for community health workers and veterinary professionals. In this light, the 40 percent of the\nproject that is designed to support resilient recovery can be counted as contributing to climate change\nadaptation (co-benefits).\n\n\n**VI.** **APPRAISAL SUMMARY**\n\n\n**A. Economic Analysis**\n\n\n89. **The economic analysis conducted as part of the project preparation process suggests that the**\n**proposed interventions are economically feasible. In particular sub-components 1.1, 2.1 and 2.3 were**\n**assessed in detail and are expected to lead to positive economic rates of return, largely in excess of the**\n**discount rate of 6 percent assumed for these interventions, by:** (i) saving human lives; (ii) reducing the\n\n\n30 FEWS-FSNAU: Food Security Outlook, February to September 2017\n31 According to climate data from the CMIP5 (Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project) database of the World\nClimate Research Program, from World Bank Climate Change Knowledge Portal\n32 Ibid\n\n\nPage 38 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "biometric systems",
+ "confidence": 0.8675893545150757,
+ "start": 34,
+ "end": 36
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "identifying beneficiaries at enrolment and payments checkpoints",
+ "confidence": 0.5083558559417725,
+ "start": 40,
+ "end": 47
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8778368234634399,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.6527038812637329,
+ "start": 41,
+ "end": 42
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.6047595143318176,
+ "start": 99,
+ "end": 100
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought forecasting services",
+ "confidence": 0.695634663105011,
+ "start": 447,
+ "end": 450
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9016999006271362,
+ "start": 374,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2050",
+ "confidence": 0.5453047156333923,
+ "start": 368,
+ "end": 369
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FSNAU",
+ "confidence": 0.868476927280426,
+ "start": 478,
+ "end": 479
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SWALIM",
+ "confidence": 0.5626153349876404,
+ "start": 480,
+ "end": 481
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FEWSNET",
+ "confidence": 0.5308873057365417,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 484
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7068191766738892,
+ "start": 374,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "climate data from the CMIP5",
+ "confidence": 0.538537859916687,
+ "start": 657,
+ "end": 662
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6469652056694031,
+ "start": 663,
+ "end": 667
+ },
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "climate data",
+ "confidence": 0.5388637781143188,
+ "start": 657,
+ "end": 659
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.6743655204772949,
+ "start": 653,
+ "end": 654
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 42
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nincidence of malnutrition; (iii) reducing expenditures on drugs and medical care; (iv) enhancing the quality of\nlife of the population; (v) saving livestock; (vi) enhancing the quality of the livestock; and (vii) enhancing\nproductive assets for agro-pastoralists through rehabilitation. The net present value (NPV) of these\ninterventions is estimated at US$180 million against a cost of US$28.3 million. The detailed results of the\nproject economic analysis are provided in Annex 3.\n\n\n**B. Technical**\n\n\n90. **The Project’s technical appraisal confirms the need for scaling-up immediate access to food and**\n**supporting immediate and medium-term recovery of livelihoods.** The immediate nature of these needs and\nthe complex operating conditions in Somalia will require the World Bank to provide a flexible financial\npackage to support humanitarian and development partners that already have a significant presence in the\ncountry and can deliver immediate life-saving interventions and support medium-term recovery, based on\nlessons learned from the 2011 Drought in partnership with FAO. This would include flexibility of resource\nallocation across sub-components as well as target ranges for results indicators instead of absolute values, in\nline with the WB Agility agenda.\n\n91. **The urgency to complement ongoing emergency assistance programs** : Given the urgency of this still\nunfolding crisis, with the UN likely to double its appeal from US$865 million to US$1.5 billion soon, this\noperation needs to be designed with extremely fast-disbursing grants, making use of retroactive financing\nand advance payments to the supported partners. It is envisaged that up to 100 percent of the ICRC\ncomponent could be retroactively financed if all expenditures are deemed eligible by the fiduciary and\nsafeguards post-review. Such financing modalities will greatly assuage the immediate cash-flow requirements\nof the supported partners and enable a quick scaling-up and widening of their ongoing emergency\ninterventions so that resources are able to quickly and efficiently reach drought-affected communities.\n\n\n92. **Technical compatibility of ICRC interventions with SEDRP approach and design** : The proposed project\napproach of financing the immediate scaling up of ongoing partner interventions requires providing\nprogrammatic rather than selective support to ICRC and FAO. The WB’s technical and sector experts involved\nin the preparation of the SEDRP are satisfied with the ICRC’s multidisciplinary emergency response to drought\nand hence recommend maximizing retroactive funding to ICRC to enable scale-up. The technical team is also\nsatisfied with the ICRC’s implementation arrangements for delivering the emergency assistance envisaged\nunder the Project. However, a rigorous technical eligibility review of all activities to be retroactively financed\nis planned by the technical team, over the next few weeks, prior to Board approval and likely effectiveness of\nthe Project in early June 2017. Specifically, due to expected funding shortfalls for ICRC, providing an\nimmediate flow of funds through retroactive financing is necessary to sustain existing momentum and scale\nup ongoing activities without causing interruption to the response program. Similarly, the WB’s technical and\nsector experts are satisfied with FAO’s multi-sector approach, which utilizes immediate drought response and\nfamine prevention activities to concurrently address medium-term recovery needs. These interventions are\ntechnically compatible with the multi-sectoral and holistic approach that the WB is adopting globally and\nregionally to respond to protracted droughts and their lingering impacts.\n\n\n93. **The need to retain flexibility to adapt to dynamic and evolving needs** . The needs for drought response\nand famine prevention activities, as outlined by the UN’s Humanitarian Appeal of $1.5 million, are based\nlargely on the failure of the 2016-2017 “Deyr” cropping season due to drought, and continue to evolve. With\n\n\nPage 39 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 43
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nthe current 2017 “Gu” rains expected to fall below average, the project requires a level of flexibility that will\nallow the supported partners the ability to adjust their approach based on the evolving needs on the ground.\nMaintaining flexibility with Component 2 of the proposed project will allow FAO the ability to regularly\nprioritize between the various activities against ever-changing conditions and needs on the ground.\nAdditionally, some FAO-implemented activities are linked to certain stages in the seasonal calendar and can\nonly be implemented in very specific time windows, which may not arise if coming rains fail. The project must\nalso ensure complementarity to the response activities of other donor and humanitarian organizations, which\ncontinue to evolve and take shape.\n\n\n**C. Financial Management**\n\n\n94. **World Bank Financial Management (FM) Requirements.** World Bank Policy/Operational Procedures\nBP/OP 10.00 - Investment Project Financing (IPF) require Recipients of grants and credits to maintain\nadequate financial management (FM) systems and arrangements to provide reasonable assurance the\ngrants/loan proceeds are used for the intended purposes. The proposed Project will support activities of FAO\nand ICRC. The assessments were undertaken in line with Annex 2 of the “Bank Guidance Projects in Situations\nof Urgent Need or Capacity Constraints.”\n\n95. **For the purposes of implementing the Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n**(SEDRP), financial management assessments** **[33 ]** **were undertaken to assess whether ICRC and FAO financial**\n**management arrangements meet the requirements of the OP/BP 10.0.** Due consideration was accorded to\nthe principles of economy, efficiency, effectiveness, transparency, and accountability. The systems were\nassessed to establish the degree to which the relevant FM arrangements will provide reasonable assurance\non the appropriate use of project funds and safeguarding of assets. The fiduciary assessment also considered\narrangements through which institutional fiduciary systems handle the risks relating to fraud and corruption\nand mechanisms through which such risks are mitigated. The financial management systems and\narrangements (which include its budgeting, accounting, internal controls, funds flow, financial reporting and\ninternal and external auditing arrangements, and related policies, procedures and practices) are expected to\nfacilitate the preparation of regular, timely and reliable financial statements; support the provision of a\ncomplete, true and fair record of all transactions and balances, safeguard assets, internal and external\nauditing arrangements in line with internationally accepted standards.\n\n96. **Specific to FAO, the assessment was conducted in line with the World Bank/United Nation Agencies**\n**Financial Management Framework Agreement (FMFA) for which FAO is a signatory.** Under the FMFA the\nWB’s FM requirements are met when a UN agency receives, manages, expends, reports on and audits the\ngrant funds in accordance with its own financial regulations, fiduciary framework and accountability and\noversight framework. Given that ICRC is not a UN Agency or a signatory to the WB/UN Agencies FMFA, the\nassessment was conducted in accordance with Annex 2 of the “Bank Guidance Projects in Situations of\nUrgent Need or Capacity Constraints” and Financial Management Manual for World Bank Investment Project\nFinancing Operations March 2010 revised February, 10 2017. The assessment therefore was done to\ndetermine the extent to which the WB can reasonably rely on ICRC fiduciary arrangement to run its activities\nas part of the Project.\n\n\n33 The assessment is conducted in accordance with Financial Management Manual for World Bank Investment\nProject Financing Operations March 2010 revised February, 10 2017\n\n\nPage 40 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9302381873130798,
+ "start": 283,
+ "end": 286
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9125733375549316,
+ "start": 268,
+ "end": 269
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "fiduciary assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.8568752408027649,
+ "start": 376,
+ "end": 378
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial statements",
+ "confidence": 0.6873832941055298,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.6673293709754944,
+ "start": 633,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.509946882724762,
+ "start": 493,
+ "end": 494
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.5260328054428101,
+ "start": 636,
+ "end": 637
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.9355514645576477,
+ "start": 633,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 44
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n97. **Overall conclusion of the assessments: In view of the specific context and the operating environment**\n**in Somalia, the combined overall fiduciary risk for the Project is assessed as high.** The high risk rating is\nlargely attributable to: a) country specific weak/ evolving rudimentary funds flow and banking systems\nparticularly at the implementation level in Somalia- characterized by Anti Money Laundering (AML) and AntiTerrorism Financing (ATF) risks; b) inadequate FM capacities at the community level to spend and account for\nthe funds correctly and on timely basis; c) limited access to the project sites at the local level due to security\nconstraints and; d) potential beneficiaries inclusion and exclusion errors in the context of the emergency\nsituation. Proposed on-going measures to mitigate the identified risks include: i) strengthening the existing\nbeneficiaries identification and enrolment systems through use of biometric systems as a way of identifying\nbeneficiaries at enrolment and payments check-points; ii) strengthening the existing framework agreements\nwith third party Payment Service Providers (PSP) to facilitate delivery of payments and services, in particular\nmeasures practical measures to minimize liquidity challenges; iii) deployment of Third Party Review\narrangements complemented by field based community monitors– centrally managed through FAO for ease\nof coordination; iv) allocation of requisite funding to strengthen the existing FAO and ICRC Internal Risk\nManagement Frameworks (particularly FAO Automated Call Centre) to cope with rapid scale up and; v) For\nthe ICRC component, undertake a program specific external audits as shall be agreed between the WB and\nICRC.\n\n98. **The proposed risk mitigation measures are aimed at strengthening the FAO and ICRC’s institutional**\n**capacity and improving systems and procedures.** The conclusion of the assessment is that the existing FAO\nand ICRC FM arrangements complemented by the project specific risk mitigation measures are adequate to\nsupport the operation. Given the high risk operating environment, the WB’s fiduciary team will work closely\nwith FAO and ICRC fiduciary teams to support and strengthen the project implementation and FM\narrangements particularly in monitoring and addressing the outlined/emerging risks during implementation.\nIn this regard, the WB shall rely on ICRC Internal control procedures complemented by periodic FM\nimplementation support supervision.\n\n**D. Procurement**\n\n\n99. **Procurement arrangements** . The project will be implemented by extending multi-sector support to the\nselected agencies, FAO and ICRC, for scaling up and strengthening their ongoing programmatic interventions\nfor drought recovery and resilience building. Given the operational context and the situation on the ground,\nthe WB has agreed that under this project, the FAO and ICRC will use their own procurement procedures as\nAlternative Procurement Arrangements (APA) allowed under Section III. F. of the World Bank: Policy\nProcurement in IPF and Other Operational Procurement Matters (July, 2016). All procurement under\nComponent 1 has already been conducted by ICRC and WB financing for these contracts will be within the\nlimits specified in the Financing Agreement.\n\n\n100. **Project Procurement Strategy for Development (PPSD).** In accordance with paragraph A.3 in section III\nof the World Bank Guidance: “Procurement in Situations of Urgent need of Assistance or Capacity\nConstraints”, preparation of the PPSD will be deferred to the project implementation phase. This deferment\nis also justified as the two organizations are already responding to the drought; with local and international\nvendors already identified for the required interventions.\n\n\nPage 41 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 45
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n101. **Procurement Plan** . FAO will prepare a Procurement Plan for activities to be procured under Component\n2 of the project, including details of the cost estimates, selection methods and market approach options and\nthe time schedules. The initial Procurement Plan for the project detailing the activities to be carried out\nduring the first 6 months of the project will be cleared by the WB before disbursement. WB is discussing the\ndraft Procurement Plan with FAO and these will be finalized and agreed during implementation, in\naccordance with paragraph A.3 in section III of the World Bank Guidance: “Procurement in Situations of\nUrgent need of Assistance or Capacity Constraints”. The Procurement Plan shall be updated at least every six\nmonths. FAO will submit to the WB procurement monitoring and contract implementation information as\npart of the quarterly project progress reports.\n\n\n102. **Procurement Assessments:** Procurement assessments were conducted for both organizations. The\nassessments included a review of the organizational structure, rules, procedures, functions, staff skills and\nexperiences, and adequacy for implementation of the project. The assessments revealed that the\nprocurement rules and regulations of both FAO and ICRC are generally consistent with the WB’s Core\nProcurement Principles and Governance requirements set out in the Procurement Policy. Key procurement\nrisks are those related to the operational context and the security situation which affects prices,\ncompetitiveness of the supply markets and limits the ability to physically verify implementation on the\nground. Other key risks include: (i) FAO capacity may be stretched due to an increase in procurement related\nwork; (ii) possibility of award of contracts to ineligible firms and individuals sanctioned by the WB; (iii) nonenforcement of the World Bank’s Anticorruption Guidelines; and (iv) lack of a robust mechanism to handle\nprocurement related complaints. The following actions were agreed in order to ensure that Bank\nrequirements are met: (i) FAO to assign sufficient number of procurement staff to handle project activities;\n(ii) ICRC to ensure application of the WB’s eligibility requirements and the World Bank Anti-Corruption\nGuidelines in future non-global procurement and contract documents including without limitation to the\nWB’s right to sanction and the WB’s inspection and audit rights; (iii) with regards to fraud and corruption for\nthe activities implemented by FAO (component 2 of the Project), the integrity principles for fraud and\ncorruption established within the Framework of the Fiduciary Principles Accord (FPA) to which FAO is a\nsignatory, will apply instead of the World Bank’s Anticorruption Guidelines; (iv) FAO to operate an effective\ncomplaints mechanism, including the right of bidders/proposers/consultants to send complaints to the WB.\n\n**E. Social (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n103. **Neither of the World Bank’s two social safeguards policies is triggered by this project.** OP4.12. There\nare minimal civil works planned under the project (Sub-component 1.2) which will entail the repair and\nrehabilitation of boreholes in areas with population under severe water stress. Only existing boreholes will\nbe rehabilitated and all borehole-related works will be carried out within existing footprints. In the worst\ncases rehabilitation will entail re-drilling or reaming of boreholes. No new construction is planned and no\ntemporary or permanent acquisition of land or assets will occur. The planned agricultural based activities will\nbe small on-farm based and again no land acquisition is envisaged. In addition, any activities related to\nInvoluntary Resettlement and Land Acquisition will be deemed as Category A (with significant adverse,\nirreversible, and long-term impacts), screened out (a screening checklist will be developed in the ESMF) and\nwill be ineligible for financing.OP4.10: To date, the World Bank has not triggered Op 4.10 in Somalia. The\nAfrican Commission on Human and People’s Rights (which reports to the African Union Heads of State) does\nnot consider that there are indigenous peoples (IPs) in Somalia, though they have considered certain Somali\nethnic groups in Ethiopia and Kenya to be IPs.\n\n\nPage 42 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly project progress reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8280345797538757,
+ "start": 170,
+ "end": 174
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "procurement monitoring and contract implementation information",
+ "confidence": 0.923566460609436,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 166
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5756052732467651,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9361535310745239,
+ "start": 179,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "review of the organizational",
+ "confidence": 0.868478536605835,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 200
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "screening checklist",
+ "confidence": 0.9725881814956665,
+ "start": 698,
+ "end": 700
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "ESMF",
+ "confidence": 0.9492486119270325,
+ "start": 705,
+ "end": 706
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 46
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n104. **The project has integrated mechanisms for social risk mitigation.** The proposed project activities in and\nof themselves are not expected to have negative social impacts. Nevertheless, given the fragile environment\nand vulnerability of target populations, it is critical that the supported partners have mechanisms in place to\nensure inclusive and transparent consultations; rigorous and continuous monitoring to detect evolving risks;\nand channels for community grievance. FAO and ICRC have both articulated detailed, comprehensive\napproaches for community consultation and outreach, while the ESMF outlines mechanisms to mitigate\nagainst potential social risks as they may arise.\n\n\n105. **Gender and Vulnerability Targeting in the ICRC Component** : In the ICRC component, priority will be\ngiven to women and children. Needs assessments will include: (a) separate focus group discussions and\nhousehold interviews with women, including local 'women groups' where these exist; (b) prioritization of\nwoman-headed households and those with high number of children for assistance; (c) nutrition surveys of\nchildren 'under 5', and; (d) adjustments of the food ration and hygiene kit to the specific needs of women and\nchildren. Similarly, the process of defining the assistance type and delivery modality involves the analysis of\nthe gender based risks and mitigation measures. Target communities will be confirmed through interviews\nwith the representatives of different population groups (e.g. village elders, woman headed households\n(WHH), households locally perceived as ‘very poor’, ‘poor’, ‘middle’ and ‘better off’, representatives of\ndifferent clans/sub-clans and/or minority groups). Particular attention is given to the key problems and\nthereof priorities and needs identified by the above population groups.\n\n\n106. **Gender Targeting in the FAO Component** : Similarly, FAO aims to ensure that at least 30 percent of\nproject’s direct beneficiaries are women. To ensure that assistance is tailored to the distinct needs and\nrealities of women and men, FAO projects employ gender analysis before activities start to integrate the\nconcerns of women and men of all ages. The needs assessment, design, implementation, monitoring and\nevaluation of FAO’s projects involve single-sex consultations. FAO Somalia has developed a standard\noperating procedure for gender mainstreaming and provides its implementing partners with gender training,\nguidelines as well as checklists to ensure the do-no-harm principle is observed. To further promote\nincorporation of gender concerns and prevention of gender based violence, all FAO contracts with partners\nhave standard clauses, including provisions to protect against GBV and sexual exploitation and abuse, which\nare monitored by the FAO Somalia Compliance and Risk Management unit and feedback and project steering\ninformation is provided in real-time to Project Managers and Responsible Officers. More details on FAO’s\nsub-component incorporation of gender considerations can be found in Annex 2 on Implementation\nArrangements.\n\n107. **A sound and effective grievance redress mechanism is essential to address quickly any disputes that**\n**individual project beneficiaries, non-beneficiaries or communities may have.** Since the project is adopting\nthe compliance standards of the two supported agencies (ICRC and FAO) the relevant grievance redress\nmechanism of both agencies (ICRC and FAO) will be adopted. Therefore, the first component, implemented\nby ICRC, will adopt ICRC’s approach and Component 2, implemented by FAO, will adopt FAO’s approach to\ngrievance redress. The grievance redress mechanism of both agencies will not only help to identify and\nresolve any potential conflict, but will also help the supported agencies to monitor and react to any conflict\ntrends that may go beyond individual cases and that may need a coordinated response. The respective GRM’s\nof ICRC and FAO Grievance are detailed in the ESMF.\n\n\nPage 43 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Needs assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.9089599847793579,
+ "start": 156,
+ "end": 158
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7119591236114502,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "woman-headed households",
+ "confidence": 0.7467593550682068,
+ "start": 189,
+ "end": 191
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "nutrition surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.9657653570175171,
+ "start": 204,
+ "end": 206
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "children 'under 5'",
+ "confidence": 0.7800105810165405,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 212
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "food ration and hygiene kit",
+ "confidence": 0.8321105241775513,
+ "start": 221,
+ "end": 226
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "feedback and project steering\ninformation",
+ "confidence": 0.7880352139472961,
+ "start": 514,
+ "end": 519
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8033335208892822,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 508
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievance redress mechanism",
+ "confidence": 0.5231572389602661,
+ "start": 559,
+ "end": 562
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.5051144361495972,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 601
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 47
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**F. Environment (including Safeguards)**\n\n\n108. **Safeguards Action Plan.** An environmental category “B” has been assigned to the Project, and two social\nand environmental safeguards policies, OP/BP 4.01 (Environmental Assessment) and OP 4.09 (Pest\nManagement) have been triggered (Table 5). Recognizing the emergency nature of the proposed operation\nand the need for providing immediate assistance, while at the same time ensuring due diligence in managing\npotential environmental and social risks, a Safeguards Action Plan has been prepared (see Annex\n2). Environmental due diligence has been undertaken for Component 1 in order to review environmental\nrisks associated with retroactive financing. An Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has\nbeen prepared to guide the design, implementation, and supervision of Component 2. The deferment of\nESMF disclosure is linked to a legal covenant in the project Financing Agreement stating that the project will\nnot be allowed to commence any Component 2 civil works until the project ESMF has been disclosed publicly\non the FAO and World Bank websites.\n\n\n109. **The Component 2 ESMF is being prepared in line with the Safeguards Action Plan.** The ESMF will\nidentify the following: (i) policy triggers for the project; (ii) screening criteria to be used for sub-project\nidentification and selection; (iii) the range of likely environmental and social impacts for the various types of\nworks/activities envisaged under the project; (iv) applicable FAO policy and regulatory requirements; (v)\nmeasures to mitigate the identified environmental risks/issues; (vi) assessment of the institutional capacity of\nthe supported agency and measures for filling capacity gaps, and; (vii) an estimate of the budget needed for\nthe implementation of the ESMF and related instruments. The ESMF will also provide a list of activities that\ncannot be financed, and screen out activities that correspond to Category A projects, or that may trigger\nadditional safeguards policies.\n\n\n_Table 6: Safeguards Policies Triggered by the Proposed Project_\n\n|Safeguards Policies Triggered|Yes|No|\n|---|---|---|\n|Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)|X||\n|Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04)||X|\n|Forests (OP/BP 4.36)||X|\n|Pest Management (OP 4.09)|X||\n|Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11)||X|\n|Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10)||X|\n|Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)||X|\n|Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37)||X|\n|Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50)||X|\n|Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)||X|\n\n\n\n**H. World Bank Grievance Redress**\n\n\n110. Communities and individuals who believe that they are adversely affected by a World Bank (WB)\nsupported project may submit complaints to existing project-level grievance redress mechanisms or the WB’s\nGrievance Redress Service (GRS). The GRS ensures that complaints received are promptly reviewed in order\nto address project-related concerns. Project affected communities and individuals may submit their\ncomplaint to the WB’s independent Inspection Panel which determines whether harm occurred, or could\noccur, as a result of WB non-compliance with its policies and procedures. Complaints may be submitted at\n\n\nPage 44 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Safeguards Action Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.7305158376693726,
+ "start": 32,
+ "end": 35
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7459565997123718,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ESMF",
+ "confidence": 0.8082486391067505,
+ "start": 356,
+ "end": 357
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "list of activities that\ncannot be financed",
+ "confidence": 0.8594673275947571,
+ "start": 367,
+ "end": 374
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Environmental Assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.6311003565788269,
+ "start": 427,
+ "end": 429
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "complaints",
+ "confidence": 0.5705307126045227,
+ "start": 635,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 48
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nany time after concerns have been brought directly to the World Bank's attention, and Bank Management\nhas been given an opportunity to respond. For information on how to submit complaints to the World Bank’s\ncorporate Grievance Redress Service (GRS), please visit _[http://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-](http://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/products-and-services/grievance-redress-service)_\n_[operations/products-and-services/grievance-redress-service](http://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/products-and-services/grievance-redress-service)_ . For information on how to submit complaints to\n. [the World Bank Inspection Panel, please visit www.inspectionpanel.org.](http://www.inspectionpanel.org/)\n\n\nPage 45 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 49
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**VII. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING**\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||**Name:**Number of people
with improved food access||Text|0|474,600 -
632,800|Quarterly
|ICRC and FAO Progress
report
|ICRC and FAO M&E
unit
|ICRC and FAO M&E
unit
|\n||of which number of
females with improved
food access||Text|0|120,000 -
155,000|Quarterly
|ICRC and FAO progress
report
|ICRC and FAO M&E un
|ICRC and FAO M&E un
|\n||Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.|Description:Number of people receiving food, cash grants from ICRC intervention (component 1.1) and cash-for-work and cash+ program (FAO - component 2.1 and 2.2)
addressing immediate food security needs.||\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 46 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Indicator Name",
+ "confidence": 0.514532208442688,
+ "start": 30,
+ "end": 32
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8838911652565002,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC and FAO progress",
+ "confidence": 0.5386848449707031,
+ "start": 224,
+ "end": 228
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "people",
+ "confidence": 0.7119222283363342,
+ "start": 264,
+ "end": 265
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC intervention",
+ "confidence": 0.8257710933685303,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash-for-work and cash+ program",
+ "confidence": 0.7172160148620605,
+ "start": 327,
+ "end": 332
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC intervention",
+ "confidence": 0.6827425956726074,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 461
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash-for-work and cash+ program",
+ "confidence": 0.7643524408340454,
+ "start": 468,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC intervention",
+ "confidence": 0.7588088512420654,
+ "start": 600,
+ "end": 602
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 50
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|access to safe water||||||||\n|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|Description:Number of people benefiting from access to repaired water points, provisioning of water storage, water treatment for cholera prevention (component 1.2)|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Name: Number of
households with increased
access to livelihood
opportunities|Col3|Text|0|13,725 -
18,300|Quarterly|FAO progress report|FAO M&E unit|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|Description:Number of household benefiting from cash for work and “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production
and overall food security) reporting an increase an income which can be cash or value of production. (component 2.1 and 2.2)|\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Col1|Name: Number of
households benefiting from
livestock vaccination and/or
treatment support|Col3|Text|0|170,000 –
212,500|Quarterly|FAO progress report|FAO M&E unit|Col10|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n||Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|Description:Number of households receiving vaccination and treatment for their livestock to improve animal health. All livestock that receive vaccination will also receive
treatment. (component 2.3)|\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**Name:**Number of||Number|0.00|35000.00|Bi-annual|ICRC progress report|ICRC M&E unit|\n\n\nPage 47 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5395873188972473,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9351522922515869,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "access to safe water",
+ "confidence": 0.5800061225891113,
+ "start": 84,
+ "end": 88
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5801210403442383,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9757180213928223,
+ "start": 380,
+ "end": 383
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9232925772666931,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E unit",
+ "confidence": 0.6518118381500244,
+ "start": 384,
+ "end": 389
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.826195240020752,
+ "start": 347,
+ "end": 348
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9470541477203369,
+ "start": 1039,
+ "end": 1042
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9645341038703918,
+ "start": 1003,
+ "end": 1004
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.8561585545539856,
+ "start": 1516,
+ "end": 1519
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.6423807144165039,
+ "start": 1357,
+ "end": 1358
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC M&E unit",
+ "confidence": 0.9534565806388855,
+ "start": 1520,
+ "end": 1525
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 51
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|households received food
rations.||||||||\n|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|Description:Number of households receive food rations comprising of rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (CSB) and oil (10 lts) per household (component 1.1).|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of
household provided with
cash grant||Number|0.00|53000.00|Bi-annual
|ICRC progress report
|ICRC M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|Description:Number of drought effected households receiving unconditional cash grant to cover the essential monthly needs focusing on food and non-food items
(component 1.1)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of Essential
Household Item (EHI) kits
distributed||Number|0.00|11000.00|Bi-annual
|ICRC progress report
|ICRC M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|Description:Number of EHI kits, comprising of kitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and fuel efficient
cooking stove, distributed to drought effected population (component 1.1).|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of
pregnant/lactating women,
and children under age five
reached by basic nutrition
service||Number|0.00|22000.00|Bi-annual
|ICRC progress report
|ICRC M&E unit
|\n|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|Description:Description: number of pregnant/lactating women, adolescent girls and/or children under age five reached by basic nutrition services (component 1.3)
|\n\n\nPage 48 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Indicator Name",
+ "confidence": 0.6283624768257141,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 20
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9308484792709351,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9665101170539856,
+ "start": 84,
+ "end": 85
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "food rations",
+ "confidence": 0.8555884957313538,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 193
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "food rations",
+ "confidence": 0.5204744935035706,
+ "start": 275,
+ "end": 277
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9775696396827698,
+ "start": 189,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9982585310935974,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 486
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "ICRC M&E unit",
+ "confidence": 0.5308196544647217,
+ "start": 490,
+ "end": 495
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought effected households",
+ "confidence": 0.9909312725067139,
+ "start": 504,
+ "end": 507
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9879871010780334,
+ "start": 813,
+ "end": 816
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought effected population",
+ "confidence": 0.9754102230072021,
+ "start": 872,
+ "end": 875
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "EHI kits",
+ "confidence": 0.949651837348938,
+ "start": 940,
+ "end": 942
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought effected population",
+ "confidence": 0.9066650867462158,
+ "start": 925,
+ "end": 928
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "EHI kits",
+ "confidence": 0.9451332092285156,
+ "start": 1099,
+ "end": 1101
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "drought effected population",
+ "confidence": 0.9344630837440491,
+ "start": 1084,
+ "end": 1087
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9820969700813293,
+ "start": 1316,
+ "end": 1319
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "pregnant/lactating women",
+ "confidence": 0.617726743221283,
+ "start": 1275,
+ "end": 1279
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "under age five reached by basic nutrition services",
+ "confidence": 0.9358073472976685,
+ "start": 1350,
+ "end": 1358
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "basic nutrition services",
+ "confidence": 0.6112910509109497,
+ "start": 1530,
+ "end": 1533
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 52
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of people
receiving drought-related
health services.||Number|0.00|540000.00|Quarterly report
|ICRC progress report
|ICRC M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|Description:Number of people receiving curative services for cholera and common conditions like upper and lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea
(non-cholera), dermatological disorders (component 1.1).|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of water
infrastructures rehabilitated||Number|0.00|35.00|Bi-annual
|ICRC progress report
|ICRC M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|Description:Number of water infrastructures which include existing boreholes, hand-dug well, rehabilitated, and provisioning of water storage (component 1.2)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of
infrastructures rehabilitated
through the cash for work
program.||Text|0|80 - 110|Quarterly
|FAO Progress report
|FAO M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|Description:Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated which include restoring water catchments, constructing contour bunds to control erosion, shoring up breaks in
river embankment to decrease flooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure (component 2.1)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of people
participating cash for work
program||Text|0|6,000 -
8,500|Quarterly
|FAO Progress Reports
|FAO M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|Description:Number of people participating in cash-for-work program, this work commonly focuses on infrastructure that improves water access, use and management,|\n\n\nPage 49 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Quarterly report",
+ "confidence": 0.9679282307624817,
+ "start": 125,
+ "end": 127
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9445627331733704,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.8574087619781494,
+ "start": 131,
+ "end": 134
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.633358895778656,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9898878931999207,
+ "start": 533,
+ "end": 536
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9921684861183167,
+ "start": 825,
+ "end": 828
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E unit",
+ "confidence": 0.9579930901527405,
+ "start": 832,
+ "end": 837
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "water infrastructures",
+ "confidence": 0.559657633304596,
+ "start": 750,
+ "end": 752
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Progress Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.982357382774353,
+ "start": 1302,
+ "end": 1305
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E unit",
+ "confidence": 0.8699619174003601,
+ "start": 1309,
+ "end": 1314
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash-for-work program",
+ "confidence": 0.7025107145309448,
+ "start": 1508,
+ "end": 1510
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 53
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|such as repairing water catchment|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Percentage of
households increased
income based on their
livelihood activities.||Percentage|0.00|70.00|Quarterly
|FAO progress report / Post
distribution assessment
|FAO M&E Unit
|\n|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|Description:Percentage of household benefiting from “Cash+” program (which provides cash, agricultural and fishing input to improve their production and overall food
security) reporting increased income. Income could be the value of the sold production and/or the value of the production used for own consumption. Any households
with at least 5% income increase will qualify. The detail income increase will be available at the project completion. (component 2.2)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of livestock
being vaccinated and/or
treated||Text|0|6,375,000 -
8,500,000|Quarterly
|FAO Progress report
|FAO M&E unit
|\n|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|Description:Number of livestock receiving PPR/SGP vaccinations and veterinary treatment for all species. The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin,
deworming and antibiotic treatments to avert further loss of livestock. Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU) will be tracked following this intervention and reported at
end of the project (component 2.3)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Number of
household benefiting from
nutrition support to livestock||Text|0|10,000 -
12,500|Quarterly
|FAO progress report
|FAO M&E
|\n|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|Description:Number of household received rangeland cubes to safeguard animals and stave off mortality. Pastoral and agropastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and
Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal, Woq Galbeed and Togdheer). (Component 2.3)|\n|||||||||\n|**Name:**Beneficiaries that||Percentage|0.00|75.00|Project end|Beneficiary impact|FAO & ICRC M&E|\n\n\nPage 50 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Indicator Name",
+ "confidence": 0.6145633459091187,
+ "start": 18,
+ "end": 20
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9367141723632812,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9207990169525146,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "distribution assessment",
+ "confidence": 0.7506232857704163,
+ "start": 193,
+ "end": 195
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E Unit",
+ "confidence": 0.907983124256134,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 204
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.993618369102478,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "detail income increase",
+ "confidence": 0.5216847062110901,
+ "start": 470,
+ "end": 473
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9938644766807556,
+ "start": 455,
+ "end": 456
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "reporting increased income",
+ "confidence": 0.8447065353393555,
+ "start": 614,
+ "end": 617
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.982282817363739,
+ "start": 641,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "income increase",
+ "confidence": 0.7347748279571533,
+ "start": 750,
+ "end": 752
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.9787269234657288,
+ "start": 827,
+ "end": 828
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9462662935256958,
+ "start": 1010,
+ "end": 1013
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "livestock",
+ "confidence": 0.6115330457687378,
+ "start": 971,
+ "end": 972
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit",
+ "confidence": 0.7904691696166992,
+ "start": 1066,
+ "end": 1071
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "livestock",
+ "confidence": 0.5413609147071838,
+ "start": 1064,
+ "end": 1065
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Increase in Tropical Livestock Unit",
+ "confidence": 0.8893519639968872,
+ "start": 1206,
+ "end": 1211
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tropical Livestock Unit",
+ "confidence": 0.7174109816551208,
+ "start": 1418,
+ "end": 1421
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "TLU",
+ "confidence": 0.5126219987869263,
+ "start": 1422,
+ "end": 1423
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "livestock",
+ "confidence": 0.8333446979522705,
+ "start": 1381,
+ "end": 1382
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Tropical Livestock Unit",
+ "confidence": 0.8331727385520935,
+ "start": 1558,
+ "end": 1561
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E",
+ "confidence": 0.6692768931388855,
+ "start": 1647,
+ "end": 1651
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "livestock",
+ "confidence": 0.5283346772193909,
+ "start": 1521,
+ "end": 1522
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.7762342095375061,
+ "start": 1640,
+ "end": 1643
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO M&E",
+ "confidence": 0.682029128074646,
+ "start": 1647,
+ "end": 1651
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Puntland",
+ "confidence": 0.5229557752609253,
+ "start": 1677,
+ "end": 1678
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "household",
+ "confidence": 0.5818381905555725,
+ "start": 1608,
+ "end": 1609
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rangeland cubes",
+ "confidence": 0.7962666153907776,
+ "start": 1662,
+ "end": 1664
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Puntland",
+ "confidence": 0.7967884540557861,
+ "start": 1677,
+ "end": 1678
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Pastoral and agropastoral families",
+ "confidence": 0.9610844850540161,
+ "start": 1672,
+ "end": 1676
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rangeland cubes",
+ "confidence": 0.8284083604812622,
+ "start": 1806,
+ "end": 1808
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Puntland",
+ "confidence": 0.7999473810195923,
+ "start": 1821,
+ "end": 1822
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Pastoral and agropastoral families",
+ "confidence": 0.964107871055603,
+ "start": 1816,
+ "end": 1820
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "rangeland cubes",
+ "confidence": 0.9357789754867554,
+ "start": 1950,
+ "end": 1952
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Puntland",
+ "confidence": 0.7316768765449524,
+ "start": 1965,
+ "end": 1966
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Pastoral and agropastoral families",
+ "confidence": 0.7834212779998779,
+ "start": 1960,
+ "end": 1964
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 54
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Core|Unit of
Measure|Baseline|End Target|Frequency|Data Source/Methodology|Responsibility for
Data Collection|\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n|report that there
Communities were
consulted and their project-
related grievances were
addressed||||||assessment survey by FAO
& ICRC
|Units
|\n|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|Description:To be measured through beneficiary impact assessment survey by FAO & ICRC for their components. Target will be an average across ICRC and FAO
components for a selection of major intervention types out of their respective components.|\n\n\nPage 51 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary impact assessment survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7330607175827026,
+ "start": 141,
+ "end": 145
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6004801392555237,
+ "start": 117,
+ "end": 118
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8892868161201477,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6700261235237122,
+ "start": 90,
+ "end": 91
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary impact assessment survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9977364540100098,
+ "start": 186,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.6141529083251953,
+ "start": 189,
+ "end": 190
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO & ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.935038685798645,
+ "start": 191,
+ "end": 194
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary impact assessment survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9981898665428162,
+ "start": 321,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.530895471572876,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 325
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO & ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.9082769751548767,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 329
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO
",
+ "confidence": 0.5375933647155762,
+ "start": 386,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO & ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.6536358594894409,
+ "start": 371,
+ "end": 374
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary impact assessment survey",
+ "confidence": 0.9991901516914368,
+ "start": 456,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.8750348091125488,
+ "start": 459,
+ "end": 460
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 55
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Number of people with improved food access|0|474,600 - 632,800|474,600 - 632,800|\n|of which number of females with improved food access|0|120,000 - 155,000|120,000 - 155,000|\n|Number of people benefiting from improved access to safe water|0.00|656000.00|656000.00|\n|Number of households with increased access to livelihood opportunities|0|13,725 - 18,300|13,725 - 18,300|\n|Number of households benefiting from livestock vaccination and/or
treatment support|0|170,000 – 212,500|170,000 – 212,500|\n\n\n\n\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Number of households received food rations.|0.00|35000.00|35000.00|\n|Number of household provided with cash grant|0.00|53000.00|53000.00|\n|Number of Essential Household Item (EHI) kits distributed|0.00|11000.00|11000.00|\n|Number of pregnant/lactating women, and children under age five reached
by basic nutrition service|0.00|22000.00|22000.00|\n\n\nPage 52 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 56
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n|Indicator Name|Baseline|YR1|End Target|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Number of people receiving drought-related health services.|0.00|540000.00|540000.00|\n|Number of water infrastructures rehabilitated|0.00|35.00|35.00|\n|Number of infrastructures rehabilitated through the cash for work
program.|0|110|80 - 110|\n|Number of people participating cash for work program|0|8,500|6,000 - 8,500|\n|Percentage of households increased income based on their livelihood
activities.|0.00|70.00|70.00|\n|Number of livestock being vaccinated and/or treated|0|8,500,000|6,375,000 - 8,500,000|\n|Number of household benefiting from nutrition support to livestock|0|10,000 - 12,500|10,000 - 12,500|\n|Beneficiaries that report that there Communities were consulted and their
project-related grievances were addressed|0.00|75.00|75.00|\n\n\n\nPage 53 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 57
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 1: DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION**\n\n\n**COUNTRY: Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n1. **Programmatic support will be provided to both ICRC and FAO to scale up ongoing activities across a**\n**range of intervention areas.** Given the unpredictable cycle of rainy/dry seasons, this programmatic\nfinancing approach, rather than one that picks and chooses specific individual interventions, will allow\nbetter targeting and prioritization of the project interventions. This would also ensure the resource\nallocation flexibility required within and across the project sub-components to respond more effectively to\nthe evolving immediate and recovery needs that could result from the unpredictability surrounding the\namount of rains that are received over the coming months. With the current “Gu” rains expected to fall 2030 percent below average, needs for immediate livelihood and famine prevention support for vulnerable\ncommunities will likely extend into the first half of 2018. The movement of pastoralist communities adds an\nadditional layer of complexity that calls for project flexibility.\n\n\n2. **The principles of resilient recovery and build-back-better are integrated throughout the project**\n**activities, especially related to Component 2, implemented by FAO.** To help increase access to fodder,\nespecially during the dry season, the project will support improved fodder production. Cash-for-Work\nprograms under this project emphasize the rehabilitation of water management systems that are critical to\ncommunity and livelihoods recovery.\n\n\n_Table 7: Project Components Financing_\n\n|Project Components|WB Financing
($US million)|\n|---|---|\n|Component 1: Programmatic support to ICRC for Immediate Drought
Response|20.00|\n|Component 2: Programmatic Support to FAO for Immediate Drought
Response and Recovery|30.00|\n|**GRAND TOTAL**|**50.00**|\n\n\n\n**Component 1 – Programmatic support to ICRC for Immediate Drought Response, SDR14.6 million (US$20**\n**million equivalent)**\n\n\n3. **This component will provide** US$20 million to support ICRC’s ongoing US$37.7 million program for\nimmediate drought response and recovery.\n\n**Sub-component 1.1 – Meeting Urgent Food Security Needs (US$13.9 million** )\n\n\n4. **This sub-component will finance the distribution of food, household items, and unconditional cash to**\n**drought-affected populations, especially in hard-to-reach areas.** The aim is to improve their food\nconsumption to a level that they have at least two meals per day for one to three months, until they can\ncover their needs independently and are less vulnerable to drought. The food and essential household item\n(EHI) distributions will be used as immediate support in situations where the affected/population does not\n\n\nPage 54 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 58
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nhave access to essential food and non-food items (e.g. disrupted markets, no access to local markets due to\nsecurity issues, absence of reliable money-transfer agencies, loss of crops and/or no income).\n\n\n5. **Food Rations:** In remote areas with depressed markets, the ICRC will distribute food rations comprising\nof staples – rice (50kgs), beans (25kg), Corn Soya Blend (12.5kg) and oil (10 lts) per household. This is\ndelivered as supplementary support to enable the coverage of basic food needs (aimed at 2106kcal per\nperson per day) of a six-member household for one month.\n\n\n6. **Essential Household Items (EHI):** The sub-component will also include distribution of non-food items or\n(EHI) to drought affected populations in order to enable them to prepare meals on their own, maintain the\nminimum required hygiene and reduce their vulnerability. The EHI kits distributed per household include\nkitchen utensil kit, hygiene kit, tarpaulin, bucket, two 10ltr jerry cans, two shawls, three mosquito nets and\nfuel efficient cooking stove.\n\n\n7. **Cash assistance:** In areas with functioning markets, the ICRC will provide cash assistance to drought\naffected populations facing urgent needs. The value of individual unconditional cash grants is designed to\nenable target households to cover essential monthly needs, focusing on food and non-food items, with an\naverage value of $80-100/HH/month. Regular market monitoring, focusing on the prices of essential food\nand non-food commodities, will be carried out in priority regions of Somalia as to enable timely adjustment\nof HH cash grants when required. Depending on the identified needs and feasibility of different response\noptions, cash assistance can follow the initial food and EHI distribution if local markets become functional in\nthe meantime.\n\n\n8. **Target Beneficiaries:** This sub-component aims to provide support to above 523,000 drought-affected\nbeneficiaries. More specifically, the beneficiaries would include the following target populations:\n\n\na. **IDP Households** : Rural population displaced due to the drought without adequate access and\ncapacity to cover essential food and non-food item needs after displacement due to loss of food stocks,\nproperties, income and productive assets.\nb. **Host Households/Communities** : Communities/settlements of IDPs in protracted displacement\nhosting drought-related IDPs without adequate food production and/or income capacities to cover their\nessential needs.\nc. **Rural communities of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists** that suffered major (over 50 percent)\nor complete losses of their crops and livestock, and are in need of external support to cover their basic\nfood needs.\nd. **Resident and IDP Households of caretakers** (pregnant and lactating women-PLW) of\nmalnourished children at the ICRC supported Stabilization Centers in Kismayo and Baidoa.\n\n9. **Priority will be given to women and children as these groups are identified as particularly vulnerable**\n**categories.** For instance, needs assessments will include separate focus group discussions and household\ninterviews with women, including local 'women groups' where these exist; prioritization of woman-headed\nhouseholds and those with high number of children for assistance; nutrition surveys of children 'under 5';\nadjustments of the food ration and hygiene kit to the specific needs of women and children. Similarly, the\nprocess of defining the assistance type and delivery modality involves the analysis of the gender based risks\nand mitigation measures. For instance, delivery of food in kind as a preferred option in situations where\n\n\nPage 55 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 59
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nwomen beneficiaries and their children might be subject to taxation on the way to and from the markets in\nneighboring towns, particularly in situations where women and children are internally displaced.\n\n\n10. **Within the projected beneficiary figure, up to around 210,000 people will receive food in-kind, of**\n**whom up to 116,000 will also benefit from EHI through one-off distribution, whilst up to 313,000 people**\n**will benefit from one to three rounds of unconditional cash assistance.** Among households planned to be\ntargeted with cash assistance, up to 18,000 beneficiaries will include caretakers of malnourished children\ntreated in ICRC supported Stabilization Centres in Kismayo and Baidoa. Support provided will include a\ncombination of therapeutic treatments, educational sessions on child-feeding practices and provision of\ncash grants to ensure the recovery upon discharge.\n\n\n11. **Geographical scope/Target areas:** Activities under this sub-component will focus primarily on the\nidentified priority areas in the South and central Somalia, and the areas of Sool and Sanaag regions in the\nnorth which are under dispute between ‘Somaliland’ and ‘Puntland’ administrations. The approach also\nconsiders the risks of internal violence in situations of displacements on a larger scale and thereof additional\npressure on limited resources of the host communities.\n\n\n**Sub-component 1.2 –** **Improving Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (US$3.6 million)**\n\n\n12. **The severe drought and poor maintenance of water facilities has reduced the available water sources**\n**for both livestock and human consumption.** The drought has also been associated with a sharp rise in the\nprevalence of acute watery diarrhea (AWD) and incidence of cholera. This sub-component will support the\nongoing ICRC activities of providing water, sanitation and hygiene, to drought affected populations and\nhealth facilities **.**\n\n\n13. **Water interventions include repair and rehabilitation of existing boreholes in areas with populations**\n**under severe water stress.** Repair includes the provision of replacement pumps, generators and other spare\nparts. Rehabilitation includes replacing casings, un-blocking, de-silting and in the worst cases re-drilling or\nreaming of boreholes. Where possible, deepening of hand-dug wells is done to make water available at\nlower cost than is possible from boreholes. Where necessary, the ICRC provides extra storage (bladders,\nlightweight ‘onion’ tanks and plastic tanks) and distribution for communities and their livestock.\n\n\n14. **Water trucking of potable water is only deployed as a last resort, life-saving intervention where the**\n**combination of drought and conflict occurs creating temporary forced displacements.** In other situations,\nthe unconditional cash grants provided under Sub-component 1.1 assist households with the purchase of\nwater.\n\n\n15. **Hygiene promotion, household water treatment (chlorine and flocculants) and mass water treatment**\n**target cholera and water borne disease prevention.** Mass water treatment is deployed in places and times\nwhere cholera is a high risk generally in larger population centers (e.g. Baidoa in March 2017). Sanitation is\nprovided at health centers and cholera treatment centers in conjunction with the provisioning of access to\nhealthcare in Sub-component 1.3.\n\n\n**Sub-component 1.3 – Improving Access to Healthcare and Nutrition (US$2.5 million)**\n\n\nPage 56 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 60
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n16. **This sub-component will support provisioning of emergency and primary health care for drought-**\n**affected populations at ICRC-supported 21 fixed and 10 mobile health facilities, stabilization centers and**\n**cholera treatment centers in Kismayo and Baidoa.** Over 500,000 people, in particular, women and children\nare expected to benefit from these health interventions. Interventions for health will include, but are not\nlimited to, treating pregnant/lactating women suffering with acute malnutrition and management of severe\nacute malnutrition in under-5 children through: (i) provisioning of curative care and rehabilitation, and; (ii)\nprovision of supplementary rations of food to enable better recovery.\n\n\n17. **Primary Healthcare Service delivery:** The project will support the provisioning of primary healthcare\nthrough the ICRC-supported Somali Red Crescent Society (SRCS) Primary Health Care (PHC) program that\ncovers the South Central Zone (SCZ) and the southern part of Puntland. SRCS is _de facto_ the first provider of\nPrimary Health Care in a country where the national health services are in an embryonic state. Health\nservices will be provided through 21 fixed clinics and 10 mobile clinics. Mother and Child Health (MCH) and\nExpanded Immunization services including routine curative services will be provided at all facilities. Most\ncommonly prevalent conditions include severe and acute malnutrition, upper and lower respiratory tract\ninfections, malaria, anemia, diarrhea (non-cholera), dermatological disorders.\n\n\n18. **Nutrition:** The project will support the nutrition program to be implemented by the ICRC through the\ntwo stabilization Centres – in Baidoa and Kismayo - and in the 21 Outpatient Therapeutic Programs (OTPs)\ndistributed across Bay, Banadir, Galgadud, Gedo, Hiran, Middle- Shabelle, Ksimayo, Lower- Shabelle, and\nMiddle Juba. Target population and main beneficiaries will be children under five 5 years old, 18 percent of\ngeneral population per region. The sub-component will also support the ICRC in implementing the nutrition\nprogram in Bay and Jubaland regions. The expected number of children under five and pregnant women to\nbenefit from these services are 3,500 for stabilization Centres; 6,000 for pregnant and lactating women;\n25,000 for outpatient therapeutic program.\n\n\n19. **Cholera treatment and prevention:** The project will also support ICRC response to the cholera epidemic\nthrough the two Cholera treatment Centres set in Baidoa and Ksimayo and an additional one is being set in\nBardere. At the community level, the ICRC will also carry out Hygiene promotion and health education\nactivities which include water chlorination in conjunction with other WASH programs) and hand washing.\n\n\n**Sub-component 1.4 – Project Management**\n\n\n20. **Costs of Project management are integrated within the sub-components to be implemented by the**\n**ICRC.** These include costs related to: (i) needs and beneficiary assessments to inform project design; (ii)\nmonitoring and evaluation of ongoing and completed activities, including the outsourcing of a Third-Party\nTechnical Review of the same; (iii) technical designs for the rehabilitation of water infrastructure included\nunder sub-component 1.2 (access to safe water); (iv) supervision quality control and contract management\nof components, and; (v) support and strengthen existing grievance redressal system for beneficiaries.\n\n**Component 2 – Programmatic Support to FAO for Immediate Drought Response and Recovery, SDR21.9**\n**million (US$30 million equivalent)**\n\n\n21. **The objective of this component is to increase immediate access to food, safeguard livelihoods and**\n**assets, and support the sustainable recovery of agriculture and pastoral livelihood systems in target**\n\n\nPage 57 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.6329496502876282,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "pregnant/lactating women",
+ "confidence": 0.6107784509658813,
+ "start": 102,
+ "end": 106
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Mother and Child Health",
+ "confidence": 0.6228956580162048,
+ "start": 239,
+ "end": 243
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "nutrition program",
+ "confidence": 0.6086803674697876,
+ "start": 303,
+ "end": 305
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Outpatient Therapeutic Programs",
+ "confidence": 0.6248143911361694,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 329
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.8833969235420227,
+ "start": 561,
+ "end": 563
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7056559920310974,
+ "start": 641,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievance redressal system",
+ "confidence": 0.8186506628990173,
+ "start": 637,
+ "end": 640
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7908841371536255,
+ "start": 641,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 61
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**communities.** Interventions under this component are designed to help address the immediate food needs\nof drought-affected households while also catalyzing recovery of productive assets, food production, and\nlivelihood systems. These interventions also align with and effectively scale up FAO’s current drought\nresponse and famine prevention operations so that the needed resources can reach affected communities\nwith maximum speed and efficiency. Interventions are also designed to simultaneously deliver short-term\nemergency relief and support the safeguarding and recovery of assets (infrastructure, inputs, skills, labor)\nthat underpin long-term resilience of agriculture production and rural livelihood systems. This project\ncomponent is designed with built-in flexibility, offering a range of response options to be selected based on\nreal-time needs and priorities on the ground, as they evolve. This will allow the project to adjust to seasonal\nrequirements (linked to the agricultural calendar), needs and coverage by other partners, as well as fill\ncritical gaps in assistance. An indicative breakdown of WB’s financing across various sub-components is\nshown in Table 8 below.\n\n\n_Table 8: Project Component 2 Financing_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Sub-Component|Component Description|WB
Financing
(US$ million)|\n|---|---|---|\n|2.1|Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water Infrastructure
Restoration|6.63|\n|2.2|Emergency Cash and Agricultural Livelihood Support|9.95|\n|2.3|Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods|8.30|\n|2.4|Strengthening Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and Early Warning Systems|1.66|\n|2.5|Project Management|3.46|\n|**Total**|**Total**|**30.0**|\n\n\n22. **Targeting under this component will be determined through consultations with local stakeholders,**\n**including district level authorities, partner NGOs and others, as appropriate.** The beneficiary selection\nprocess will also be guided by continuous social and gender analysis, through improved geographical\ntargeting upstream to ensure minimum thresholds for the inclusion of vulnerable groups, including minority\nclans, women-dependent households, returnees/internally displaced people and communities recently\naffected by shocks or displacement.\n\n\n**Sub-component 2.1 – Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water Infrastructure Restoration**\n**(US$6.63 million)**\n\n23. **Due to extensive crop failure and livestock losses, rural households lack food and income to buy food.**\nIn pastoral areas, livestock conditions are so poor that most animals are no longer marketable. When sold or\ntraded for other food items, livestock are fetching little in return due to declining livestock-to-grain Terms of\nTrade. In southern Somalia, most families already have little to no food stocks and are increasingly relying on\nmarket purchases for food. Unless the “Gu” rains (April to June) are more favorable than projections, food\ninsecurity and low labor wage rates will likely worsen through the second half of the year.\n\n24. **To prevent famine by providing vulnerable households through Cash-for-Work with immediate cash**\n**to buy food and water while at the same time rehabilitating water-related productive assets like small-**\n**scale irrigation canals or water catchments to cater for livestock water needs, this sub-component will**\n\n\nPage 58 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 62
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**support the scaling up of FAO’s ongoing cash-for-work programs.** The component can support\napproximately 8,500 acutely food insecure households (51,000 individuals) in districts of Somalia facing food\nsecurity ‘Crisis’ and ‘Emergency’ (IPC Phases 3 and 4). FAO will identify the most vulnerable individual\nhouseholds at the district level facilitated by the implementing partner, in collaboration with local\nauthorities and other stakeholders, including other agencies implementing activities in the districts.\n\n\n25. **FAO’s cash-for-work programs provide cash relief so families can meet their immediate food needs,**\n**while engaging them to rebuild infrastructure needed to safeguard and/or restore livelihoods.** Since\nJanuary 2017, cash-for-work programs have repaired 15 irrigation canals, which have scope to boost local\nmaize production by around 80 percent. Additionally, over 100 water catchments have been repaired, able\nto store water for more than 200,000 animals for an entire dry season. These programs also provide rural\nfamilies with the means and incentive to remain in rural areas, preventing further displacement and\ndestitution.\n\n\n26. **Under FAO’s cash-for-work programs and based on lessons learned from the 2011 drought response,**\n**FAO will adjust its cash-payment schedule to reflect the extremely poor food security situation and the**\n**urgent need for cash. For example, families to engage in cash-for-work activities will receive cash upon**\n**registration, equivalent to two weeks of paid labor.** This front-loaded payment will enable families to\nimprove their food intake immediately, and will be on top of the 12 weeks of paid work. With a focus on\naccess, use and management of water, activities supported under this component include restoring water\ncatchments to preserve water for livestock throughout the dry months, constructing contour bunds to\ncontrol erosion and improve efficiency of water use, shoring up breaks in river embankment to decrease\nflooding, and rehabilitating small-scale irrigation canals and water harvesting and storage infrastructure. The\nCash-for-Work component covers both the pastoral areas in the north and the dryland agro-pastoral\nsystems in the south (through the water catchments and contour bunds) as well as irrigated agricultural\nareas along the rivers in the south (through rehabilitation of the irrigation canals).\n\n\n27. **Targeted beneficiaries will engage in cash-for-work activities six days per week (for a period 12**\n**weeks), paid at the rate established by the Cash and Markets Working Group (CMWG).** Rates will be\ndetermined by a calculation of 80 percent of the cost of the minimum expenditure basket. Families unable\nto engage in work due to age, health or other constraints will receive unconditional cash without the\nrequirement to engage in the infrastructure works. This will enhance social protection and ensure that the\nmost vulnerable households are not left behind, such as those headed by ill family members, pregnant\nwomen, the elderly, and people with disabilities. The cash amount will be of equal quantity and duration as\nunder cash-for-work schemes. FAO estimates that around 20 percent of households targeted will receive\nunconditional cash. However, this is scalable depending on the distinct needs and vulnerabilities in targeted\ncommunities and relative changes in the food security situation.\n\n\n28. **Activities at district level will begin with the identification of communities/beneficiaries most affected**\n**by the current crisis, through consultations with local stakeholders, including district level authorities,**\n**partner NGOs and others, as appropriate.** The FAO’s digitalized fingerprint (biometrics) with photosupported voucher systems will be used, wherever possible. Beneficiary payments will be undertaken\nthrough designated money vendor offices. Occasionally, the money vendor will be requested to travel and\nmake payments at the work sites, especially when the sites/villages are located far from the main offices, in\ncoordination with the selected implementing partners. This arrangement to make payments at village\n\n\nPage 59 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.8190441131591797,
+ "start": 24,
+ "end": 25
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.5207855105400085,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable individual\nhouseholds",
+ "confidence": 0.7286025285720825,
+ "start": 78,
+ "end": 81
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "water\ncatchments",
+ "confidence": 0.8487579822540283,
+ "start": 350,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Targeted beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7160816192626953,
+ "start": 450,
+ "end": 452
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash-for-work schemes",
+ "confidence": 0.6285927295684814,
+ "start": 587,
+ "end": 589
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "digitalized fingerprint",
+ "confidence": 0.7058192491531372,
+ "start": 685,
+ "end": 687
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "biometrics",
+ "confidence": 0.548835277557373,
+ "start": 688,
+ "end": 689
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.831875205039978,
+ "start": 682,
+ "end": 683
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "photosupported voucher systems",
+ "confidence": 0.80757737159729,
+ "start": 691,
+ "end": 694
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5323107838630676,
+ "start": 682,
+ "end": 683
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 63
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nlocations will ensure no extra burden is added (e.g. walking or travelling to distant places to collect funds),\nespecially for women who have demanding schedules due to their regular daily caretaking roles within the\nhousehold. FAO will pay travel allowances to beneficiaries to collect payments from the designated money\nvendor office. Money vendor payments at the village level will not include any transport allowance; instead,\nmoney vendors will be covered for additional costs for security and delivery of payments.\n\n**Sub-component 2.2 – Emergency Cash and Agricultural Livelihood Support (US$9.95 million)**\n\n\n29. **To deter displacement and keep farmers productive on their land, households urgently need:** i) cash to\nmeet their immediate food needs; and ii) farming inputs for the upcoming “Deyr” season (OctoberDecember 2017). Thus, interventions under this sub-component will support the recovery of agriculture\nproduction systems through scale up of FAO’s “Cash+” program.\n\n\n30. **The program will support approximately 9,800 vulnerable households, within districts classified to be**\n**in IPC 3 and 4 in Somalia’s southern breadbasket (riverine farming and agro-pastoral areas) and in**\n**northwest agro-pastoral areas (Somaliland).** This includes around 1,000 riverine households to receive cash\ntransfers combined with fishing kits and trainings on their appropriate use.\n\n\n31. **The program will provide food insecure riverine farming and agro-pastoral households with**\n**unconditional cash transfers.** This will be delivered on a monthly basis for three months (i.e., the full\nduration of a growing season until the harvest becomes available), plus phased agricultural input support at\nthe beginning and end of the planting season (i.e., first, quality seeds to plant, then hermetic bags to store\ntheir harvest; in irrigated areas, also fertilizer vouchers will be included). This intervention will discourage\ndisplacement and ensure that farmers have cash to meet their immediate food needs and the means to\ngrow crops to meet their own food and income needs in the near term. For cash transfers, the registration\nand payment modalities indicated for cash-for-work, under Sub-component 2.1, will be applied. In addition,\nthe program will also target vulnerable households in riverine communities, by providing the cash transfers\nwith fishing kits. Increased fish consumption will enrichen diets with vital proteins, vitamins and\nmicronutrients, including calcium, iron, zinc and vitamins A, B12 and D. This will diversify diets otherwise\neclipsed by carbohydrates.\n\n32. **For cash transfers, the registration and payment modalities indicated for cash-for-work, under Sub-**\n**component 2.1, will be applied.** In areas where well-functioning input markets exist, voucher systems will\nbe leveraged to stimulate demand and market-driven supply of needed inputs (seeds, fertilizers etc.) and\nservices (land preparation and irrigation support).\n\n33. **FAO will use voucher schemes to provide farmers with access to seeds, fertilizers, land preparation**\n**and irrigation support.** In areas where well-functioning input markets exist, voucher systems will be\nleveraged to stimulate demand and market-driven supply of needed inputs (seeds, fertilizers etc.) and\nservices (land preparation and irrigation support). Serialized vouchers will be generated by FAO in line with\nthe needs identified in each district and will include the quantity and type of inputs entitled to each\nhousehold. FAO will ensure that each household receives one voucher for each input type to be redeemed\nfrom pre-selected traders at village level, and will adopt stringent checks and controls during the voucher\ndistribution process. Traders will retain the vouchers to claim payment from the money vendors. FAO has\nquality control mechanisms in place to ensure that the inputs distributed meet FAO technical specifications.\n\n\nPage 60 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5262576341629028,
+ "start": 59,
+ "end": 60
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "households",
+ "confidence": 0.6985604763031006,
+ "start": 145,
+ "end": 146
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash-for-work",
+ "confidence": 0.6069528460502625,
+ "start": 436,
+ "end": 437
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vulnerable households",
+ "confidence": 0.5258464217185974,
+ "start": 456,
+ "end": 458
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "voucher systems",
+ "confidence": 0.7142709493637085,
+ "start": 551,
+ "end": 553
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "farmers",
+ "confidence": 0.7124767899513245,
+ "start": 593,
+ "end": 594
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "voucher systems",
+ "confidence": 0.830180287361145,
+ "start": 621,
+ "end": 623
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5962034463882446,
+ "start": 745,
+ "end": 746
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "household",
+ "confidence": 0.7153860330581665,
+ "start": 680,
+ "end": 681
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 64
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nThe voucher scheme is built on a rationale whereby beneficiaries benefit from high quality inputs provided\nin a timely manner to enable early planting while maximizing returns. It will also contribute to building the\nresilience of seed supply markets by stimulating local demand. Beneficiaries will also receive training in good\nagricultural practices (e.g. from planting to harvest). For the fisheries inputs, riverine fishing kits will be\nprocured by FAO and delivered to implementing partners, who will distribute them to beneficiaries directly\nin nearby urban centers. These kits will include hooks, lines, fishing weights, knives, a solar-powered torch,\ncooler, chopping board and solar powered fridges, accompanied by training in their proper use.\n\n34. **The Cash+ packages will include** :\n\n - 3 months’ cash, i.e. the duration of a growing season, from sowing to harvest\n\n - Seeds and storage bags for farming and agro-pastoral households, including:\na. Sorghum (15kg) in agro-pastoral areas\nb. Maize (20 kg) in riverine areas plus irrigation vouchers (18 hrs/hh)\nc. Cowpea (10kg)\nd. Vegetable (240g)\ne. Fertilizer (100 kg Urea, 100 kg DAP) in riverine areas only\nf. 3 hours of tractor land preparation (Somaliland only)\n\n - Fishing kits in riverine areas (as detailed above)\n\n**Sub-component 2.3 – Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods (US$8.30 million)**\n\n\n35. **Consecutive seasons of poor rainfall have caused widespread shortage of water and pasture.** In most\nregions, access to food and income among pastoralist and agro-pastoralists has declined drastically as herds\nare sold or die off, milk production drops, livestock prices diminish while water and grain prices rise, leading\nto a drop in livestock-to-grans terms of trade. Livestock survival during the dry season is not the only\nchallenge. Once rains return, weak animals will be at high risk of hypothermia. Therefore, this component\nwill scale up FAO’s emergency supportive livestock treatment program to keep animals alive, healthy and\nproductive. The objective is to preserve vital food and income sources among food insecure households.\nRapid scale up is critical, as the sooner animals are treated and vaccinated against major diseases (e.g.\nPPR/SGP) the sooner they will become productive again and regain value.\n\n\n36. **The range of activities indicated under this component are illustrative and depending on various**\n**factors (such as rainfall status, epidemiology, livestock migration, etc.) the activities will be prioritized and**\n**implemented as needed.** Accordingly, there will be a need to consider reallocation of the budget across subcomponent activities throughout the project lifecycle.\n\n37. **This sub-component will support FAO to: i) vaccinate sheep and goats against common diseases (i.e.**\n**Peste des Petits Ruminants [PPR] and Sheep and Goat Pox [SGP]), and/or; ii) provide emergency**\n**supportive treatment to livestock (all species), including the provision of multivitamins, deworming, ecto-**\n**parasite control and antibiotic treatments.** The component will also support the procurement and provision\nof veterinary drugs, essential vaccines, and veterinary supplies and equipment. Veterinary teams will be\ndeployed to the field to deliver these interventions and conduct community awareness campaigns whereby\nlocal communities will be sensitized on the project objective, activities and implementation plans, covering\nall districts of the targeted regions. The project will work through, wherever feasible, existing veterinary\nservice systems; including veterinary professional’s associations and Community Animal Health Workers\n\n\nPage 61 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 65
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n(CAHWs). Through Letters of Agreement, FAO will contract regional veterinary associations to undertake the\nPPR/SGP vaccinations (sheep and goats) and treatment (all species). In the second half of 2017, planned\ntargets include the vaccination and/or treatment of up to 8.5 million livestock (belonging to 212,500\nhouseholds). The veterinary treatment entails provision of multivitamin, deworming and antibiotic\ntreatments to avert further loss of livestock.\n\n\n38. **The livestock vaccination and treatment campaign would target animals in central and southern**\n**Somalia.** The intervention would indirectly benefit around 212,500 households who own (and depend on)\nthe assisted animals.\n\n\n_Table 9: Livestock vaccination targets by location_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Administrative entities|Number of animals (HHs) targeted for
PPR/SGP vaccination|Implementing
partner|\n|---|---|---|\n|Central Somalia|4,000,000|CERELPA|\n|South Somalia|4,000,000|SOWELPA|\n|Banadir region|500,000|BENALPA|\n\n\n39. **In certain high risk area, rangeland cubes will be provided to safeguard animals and stave off**\n**mortality. Pastoral and agro-pastoral families in Puntland (Nugal and Mudug) and Somaliland (Awdal,**\n**Woq Galbeed and Togdheer) will benefit from the provision of rangeland cubes for their sheep and goats**\n**as short-term supplemental feed during the current drought period.** The concept is to provide additional\nprotein, energy, minerals and vitamins given that there are hardly any pastures available following the long\nspells of drought, for an estimated 12,500 households. FAO will contract service providers through Letters\nof Agreement (LoA) to facilitate in the distribution and provision of relevant technical information to\ntargeted beneficiaries.\n\n40. **In some targeted areas, livestock restocking interventions may be mobilized wherein vulnerable**\n**households will be provided with productive goats (8 female goats and 2 male goats) to rebuild their**\n**livestock assets.** Healthy productive goats shall be procured in-country or in the neighboring regions of the\ntargeted areas, depending on their availability. The goats shall be vaccinated against PPR/SGP, dewormed\nand quarantined by Livestock Professional Associations before distribution.\n\n\n41. **Other interventions that may be supported under this component include** i) capacity building support\nto Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) and Veterinary Professional Associations, and ii) support for\nfodder production.\n\n\n42. **This sub-component will also:**\n\na. Provide target communities selected for fodder production with fodder seeds, land\n\npreparation, irrigation support and other tools (e.g. bale boxes) for extensive fodder\nproduction for own use, marketing support to link them with downstream traders/buyers and a\npotential buy out by FAO for safeguarding livestock during drought.\n\n\nPage 62 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 66
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nb. Train farmer groups in fodder processing, conservation (hay and silage) and nutrient\n\nenrichment of crop residues\nc. Train local artisans to build capacity for production of fodder, processing and conservation\n\nequipment and tools to enhance accessibility.\nd. To better inform the above indicated fodder production interventions, the component, as\n\nappropriate, will receive technical assistance on fodder value chain development opportunities\nfrom FAO experts.\n\n43. **For the fodder production interventions, farmers will form common interest groups (CIGs) as entry**\n**points but involve a farmer-participatory process where farmers will be fully involved.** Incorporating the\nconcerns of pastoralist women in project design and ensuring women's active participation and involvement\nwill be a consideration in the design of the proposed interventions.\n\n\n**Sub-component 2.4 – Strengthening Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and Early Warning Systems**\n**(US$1.66 Million)**\n\n\n44. **To improve the ability of all stakeholders to take early action for droughts, this sub-component will:** i)\nsupport the development of community drought preparedness and response plans; ii) strengthen weather\nmonitoring and forecasting through the existing water and land information management system initiative\n(SWALIM); and iii) strengthen the generation, management and dissemination of early warning data through\nsupporting the Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU).\n\n\n45. **To promote resilience to drought, affected communities will be engaged to develop community-level**\n**drought preparedness and response plans.** Building on community-specific contexts, drought preparedness\nplans will guide communities on: (i) how to implement systems for monitoring drought impacts; (ii)\nestablishing regular communication on drought conditions across communities and with monitoring\nagencies, and (iii) specific actions to take before, during and after a drought. Preparedness planning will\nhave specific benefits for communities, including improved water management and food storage, increased\ndrought awareness, greater protection from flooding, and reduced future livelihood losses due to protection\nof feed, animals, and crops from drought impacts.\n\n\n46. **Programmatic support will be provided to SWALIM, which is playing a vital role in the ongoing famine**\n**prevention and drought response in Somalia.** For example, SWALIM is monitoring the weather parameters\n(rainfall, temperature, humidity, sunshine, soil moisture), providing weather forecasts and early warning for\ndroughts and seasonal riverine floods, and updating water source conditions (boreholes, reservoirs, etc.),\nwhich facilitates targeting of migrating pastoralists for immediate and livelihood assistance. SWALIM is\nfurthermore supporting and training land and water information centers inside the ministries, which in turn\nprovide information to the government disaster management agencies. SWALIM is also supporting the\nnewly established Drought Operation and Coordination Centers with information, staffing, mapping tools,\netc. Activities will include:\n\n\n - Updating the Somalia water sources database (commonly referred to as the Somalia water\nsources live map) and providing data through an online client service platform.\n\n\nPage 63 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "fodder production interventions",
+ "confidence": 0.6211510300636292,
+ "start": 69,
+ "end": 72
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO experts",
+ "confidence": 0.5656019449234009,
+ "start": 90,
+ "end": 92
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6924012899398804,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought preparedness and response plans",
+ "confidence": 0.5146220326423645,
+ "start": 224,
+ "end": 229
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "weather\nmonitoring and forecasting",
+ "confidence": 0.6020901799201965,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 237
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "affected communities",
+ "confidence": 0.8554955720901489,
+ "start": 288,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "early warning data",
+ "confidence": 0.5122535824775696,
+ "start": 262,
+ "end": 265
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "weather\nmonitoring and forecasting",
+ "confidence": 0.6430498361587524,
+ "start": 233,
+ "end": 237
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "affected communities",
+ "confidence": 0.6913486123085022,
+ "start": 288,
+ "end": 290
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought preparedness\nplans",
+ "confidence": 0.762423038482666,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 316
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9143637418746948,
+ "start": 441,
+ "end": 442
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "migrating pastoralists",
+ "confidence": 0.776732861995697,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SWALIM",
+ "confidence": 0.8884372711181641,
+ "start": 420,
+ "end": 421
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9346737265586853,
+ "start": 441,
+ "end": 442
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "migrating pastoralists",
+ "confidence": 0.8830879926681519,
+ "start": 498,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia water sources database",
+ "confidence": 0.9916449189186096,
+ "start": 562,
+ "end": 566
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9972201585769653,
+ "start": 562,
+ "end": 563
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 67
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n - Monitoring daily river levels at different locations along the Juba and Shabelle rivers and\nproviding the information on an online platform (http://systems.faoso.net/frrims/).\n\n - Analyzing Juba and Shabelle rivers using Very High Resolution (VHR) satellite images to identify\nthe locations and size of the breakages on their banks.\n\n - Training community, staff and development agencies on quality data collected using\ngeoreferenced mobile data collection devices.\n\n - Performing remote monitoring of Cash-for-Work activities using SWALIM’s well-developed geospatial analytical capacity.\n\n\n47. **The programmatic support will enable FSNAU to monitor 32 markets across Somalia on a weekly**\n**basis, conduct monthly food security monitoring across the country, conduct seasonal and follow up food**\n**security, nutrition and mortality assessments, and deliver the training of government staff in these**\n**assessments.** The support will also be used to strengthen FSNAU's Early Warning -Early Action database and\ndashboard, which was established in 2016 in order to strengthen the linkages between early warning and\nearly action in Somalia.\n\n\n**Sub-component 2.5 – Project Management (US$3.46 Million)**\n\n48. **This sub-component will finance the following activities:** (i) direct operating costs for project design\nand implementation, including technical design; community-based services; supervision and monitoring\ncosts; rental of warehouses and office space; utilities and communication charges; (ii) direct operating costs\nfor FAO, including independent Third-Party Technical Review and evaluation as activities are ongoing and\ncompleted, including end of project evaluation; FAO’s overall management, operations and coordination of\nthe project; supervision, quality control and contract management of components; support for\ncommunications and information management systems; coordination mechanisms to ensure\ncomplementarity with other partner activities and avoid duplication of efforts and enhance public relations;\nsupport and strengthening of existing grievance redressal systems for beneficiaries; audits and studies to\nidentify and mitigate potential adverse environment and social impacts and assessments required under\nvarious project components; and the incremental operating costs arising under the project on account of\nvehicle operation for supervisors, monitors, and related travel costs and per diems; and (iii) Indirect costs, or\noverall project servicing and administration costs.\n\n\nPage 64 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Early Warning -Early Action database",
+ "confidence": 0.8663498163223267,
+ "start": 183,
+ "end": 189
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "linkages between early warning and\nearly action",
+ "confidence": 0.5606974363327026,
+ "start": 202,
+ "end": 209
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FSNAU",
+ "confidence": 0.9023295044898987,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9902267456054688,
+ "start": 210,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.933856189250946,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "communications and information management systems",
+ "confidence": 0.6627252697944641,
+ "start": 335,
+ "end": 340
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "linkages between early warning and\nearly action",
+ "confidence": 0.5386583805084229,
+ "start": 202,
+ "end": 209
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FSNAU",
+ "confidence": 0.5881049036979675,
+ "start": 180,
+ "end": 181
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7639006972312927,
+ "start": 210,
+ "end": 211
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9174871444702148,
+ "start": 196,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "grievance redressal systems",
+ "confidence": 0.6935728192329407,
+ "start": 365,
+ "end": 368
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5988288521766663,
+ "start": 369,
+ "end": 370
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audits and studies",
+ "confidence": 0.5907479524612427,
+ "start": 371,
+ "end": 374
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 68
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 2: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS**\n\n\n**COUNTRY: Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n\n**Project Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**\n\n\n1. **SEDRP implementation arrangements will utilize the existing structures of the supported partners –**\n**ICRC for Component 1 and FAO for Component 2.** SEDRP will also operate within the program level\ncoordination framework for the overall multi-partner immediate drought response. Some project-specific\nfunctions for oversight and coordination will also be established as required.\n\n2. **Informal Apex-Level Consultative Mechanism** . An informal apex-level group – with the World Bank\nSomalia Country Representative, the ICRC Head of Delegation, and the FAO Country Representative – will\ncoordinate on the overall progress for their respective activities. Regular coordination will be maintained\nwith Somalia’s Ministry of Humanitarian and Disaster Management to align with the overall drought\nresponse and recovery program led by the Government. Similar coordination will be maintained with the\nUN humanitarian and early recovery programs, on an as need basis. The Informal Apex-Level Consultative\nMechanism will link the project with the UN team coordinating “Economic Recovery” from the drought,\nincluding the UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator and the UNDP Country Director.\n\n\n3. **Technical Working Group (TWG).** A Technical Working Group (TWG) will support the Apex structure by:\na) providing updates on progress and results; b) informing of project challenges and risks, and; c) providing\nrecommendations to resolve any issues. The TWG is composed of the ICRC and FAO _focal points_ for SEDRP,\nand will be supported by the World Bank Task Team for the Project. The TWG is the primary mechanism for\noperational coordination at the program and district levels across the ICRC and FAO components.\n\n\n4. **Role of FAO and ICRC Focal Points for SEDRP** . FAO and ICRC will designate _focal points_ for SEDRP,\nresponsible for central coordination and reporting for their respective components, via the TWG. The focal\npoints will serve as a single point of contact to the apex structure; and with the World Bank Task Team for\noperational matters including but not restricted to: a) coordination across and within project components;\nb) quality assurance and process oversight; c) progress and results reporting; d) management of Third-Party\nTechnical Review firm (for FAO component only); e) identification and preparation of interventions and\nprogressive preparation of component work plans; f) procurement of goods, works and services (and\nseeking of World Bank no-objections if necessary); g) contract management oversight and control of\noutsourced activities; h) technical certification and quality assurance of the work of contractors and\nsupported partners; i) facilitating financial and M&E reporting to the WB, and; j) monitoring of, and\nreporting on, social and environmental safeguards compliance, including maintaining grievance redress\nmechanisms.\n\n5. **Resources for FAO and ICRC Implementation and Coordination** . The project includes resources for FAO\nand ICRC to complement their respective implementation and coordination roles. These resources can\nfinance upfront or progressively determined capacity enhancement needs. FAO will receive resources under\nthe Project to enhance its overall coordination of various partners and stakeholders falling under the Food\nCluster.\n\n\nPage 65 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.8013959527015686,
+ "start": 57,
+ "end": 58
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9454575181007385,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "TWG",
+ "confidence": 0.7661899924278259,
+ "start": 307,
+ "end": 308
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank Task Team",
+ "confidence": 0.5558091998100281,
+ "start": 326,
+ "end": 330
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "primary"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.5401777625083923,
+ "start": 318,
+ "end": 319
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.543241024017334,
+ "start": 171,
+ "end": 172
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 69
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n6. **Operational Coordination and Harmonization across FAO and ICRC Components and beyond** . Project\ncoordination will be maintained at the program, HQ, and field levels between ICRC and FAO. Coordination\nwill focus on: (i) spatial elements, to avoid coverage gaps and overlaps; (ii) programming and timing of the\nrespective responses of various agencies to maximize effectiveness and complementarities; (iii)\nharmonization of the support packages across various project sub-components, and alignment of targeting\nmechanisms, (iv) synchronized reporting on component progress, results and processes, and; (v) progressive\ndetermination and resolution of any jointly faced, or coordination-specific, issues and challenges.\n\n\n_Chart 1: SEDRP Coordination Structure_\n\n\nPage 66 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 70
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_Map 1: ICRC and FAO Coverage_ _[34]_\n\n\n34 Base map cleared by WB General Services Department Cartography Department on April 24, 2017.\n\n\n\nPage 67 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 71
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_Chart 2: SEDRP Institutional and Implementation Arrangements_\n\n\n\nPage 68 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 72
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_**ICRC Background and Operating Modalities**_\n\n\n7. **The International Committee of the Red Cross, established in 1863, is one of the largest humanitarian**\n**organizations in the world, with presence in over 80 countries. ICRC has been operational in Somalia since**\n**1984, delivering assistance in partnership with the Somali Red Crescent Society (SRCS)** . Given its policy of\nneutrality and long track record of delivery, ICRC has access to areas and communities where others do not,\nthereby enabling timely support to the most vulnerable. ICRC has offices in Mogadishu, Kismayo, Baidoa,\nGarowe, and Beletweyne, and antennas in Guri-Ceel, Galkayo, Xudur and Dhobley.\n\n\n8. **In Somalia, the ICRC operates along two parallel tracks.** Track one responds to the long-term structural\nhumanitarian consequences (chronic emergencies) of protracted conflict and lack of governance and social\nservices for 25 years. These programs focus on resilience and livelihoods and activities aimed at preventing\ndisplacement and migration. Track two responds to acute punctual emergencies (drought and floods),\nviolence (non-international armed conflict and clan violence) or health (AWD/cholera and measles\noutbreaks). Since 2015, the ICRC has restructured and strengthened its acute emergency response capacity\nwith measures such as: revamping of the warehouses network, additional logistical staff, establishment of\ncontingency stocks, creation of Emergency Response Teams and increased partnership with the SRCS.\n\n\n9. **Access to hard-to-reach areas:** The ICRC is able to operate in Al-Shabaab controlled/heavily influenced\nregions, where no other or very few humanitarian actors are present. The ICRC has used its access strategy\nof having sustained confidential dialogue with all parties, supported by its neutral and independent\nhumanitarian action on the ground, to deliver humanitarian assistance in Al-Shabaab controlled areas. The\nmap below illustrates ICRC’s presence and operability in areas with various levels of access constraints (or\nAl-Shabaab controlled/influenced areas). This access to hard-to-reach areas and places hosting IDPs has\nbeen crucial, given the need for timely provisioning of water, food and essential supplies, to preventing\nfurther displacement among civilians. In particular, this would enable delivery of services to children or\npregnant women at risk of malnutrition who find it difficult to survive long journeys in harsh conditions in\nsearch of aid. The combined coverage of ICRC and FAO is shown in the map below.\n\n\n10. **Multidisciplinary programmatic approach** : The ICRC’s multidisciplinary approach to drought response,\nsupported by presence of technical departments like Economic Security (food, non-food and livelihood),\nWater and Habitat (water infrastructure, treatment, hygiene promotion and engineering), health (curative\nand preventive aspects at all healthcare tiers, nutrition), allows it to focus not only on the food\nsecurity/nutritional aspects but also on ensuring water provision and distribution in key regions, as well as\nreinforcing the health set up in anticipation of possible drought-related epidemics. This multi-disciplinary\ncapacity to respond has also added to timeliness due to reduced transaction, consultation and coordination\ntime.\n\n\n11. **Timeliness** : The twin-track continued response to chronic and punctual emergencies makes the ICRC\none of the first-responders and provides an added value of timeliness when it comes to response to largescale drought. This is enabled by its on-ground partnership with the Somali Red Crescent Society, which,\nthrough its network of volunteers and SRCS branches, has been able to timely access hard-to-reach areas,\nand provided capacity to deliver assistance at a large-scale in response to the severe drought.\n\n\nPage 69 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 73
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n12. **ICRC and SRCS Partnership:** For all activities and programs carried out in partnership with ICRC, SRCS is\nclosely associated throughout the project cycle, from design to implementation to monitoring, as part of the\nICRC effort to build the capacity of the SRCS. In addition, SRCS’ anchorage within the community through its\nvast network of volunteers and acceptance as local actor by the parties is of particular added value to the\nICRC’s work, especially during the design phase (e.g. beneficiary identification). Monitoring of the activities\nimplemented with the support of the SRCS is also carried out jointly under the supervision of ICRC respective\nexperts (economic security, water and health) to ensure, and improve whenever necessary, the quality of\nthe services provided. Activities not carried out jointly (e.g. with other Red Cross Red Crescent Movement\npartners) are closely coordinated to ensure complementarity, avoid any overlap but also preserve the\nacceptance and reputation of both organizations by all parties in Somalia through regular meetings at the\nNairobi office and in the field. It is noted that for the purpose of the Project, particularly on Sub-component\n1.3, ICRC financial support to SRCS will cover the payment of per-diems for staff and volunteers of SRCS who\nare involved in support activities, namely the delivery and distribution of emergency aid or material\nnecessary to ICRC operations. This support is always undertaken under the responsibility and supervision of\nICRC personnel. Payments of the per-diems are triggered by ICRC, based on the SRCS per diem policy. Hence,\nSRCS is not involved in running activities on behalf of ICRC.\n\n\n13. **Complementarity:** The ICRC keeps its Somalia-level operational coordination and dialogue with UN and\nother actors very limited due to issues of security, independence and neutrality that could jeopardize its\naccess to hard-to-reach areas. However, the ICRC’s Somalia delegation in Nairobi coordinates through\ncluster meetings and bilaterally, with a wide array of relevant humanitarian actors and stakeholders\nincluding key UN agencies, embassies, donors, Somali nationals, regional and local bodies, and clan and\ncommunity leaders, to guide ICRCs planned and ongoing response. This is to ensure not just activity but also\ngeographical complementarity, with an aim to concentrate on those areas which are more difficult to access\nfor the humanitarian partners (particularly Al-Shabaab-controlled areas in the central and southern parts of\nthe country), leaving the others for the UN and its implementing partners. In addition, there is an ongoing\ndialogue with the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) to focus\nprimarily on health in Puntland and Somaliland, which would complement the intervention of the Red Cross\nconsortium in Western Somaliland and of the ICRC in the rest of the country.\n\n\n14. **Alignment** : Through the exchange with UN-led assistance clusters, including bilateral exchange with\ndifferent agencies, ICRC follows closely on the value of different assistance grants of other actors. It is to be\nmentioned that the ICRC exchange with other relevant actors started prior to launching the response, where\nthe type, contents and value of different assistance grants was discussed. The focus is placed primarily on\ncash grants, food rations and EHI kits, of which the cash grants are the most common within the ongoing\ndrought response. In principle, food and NFI items provided are quite similar to those of other actors. The\nreferences provided by the UN led 'Cash Working Group' have already been used by ICRC to crosscheck the\nvalue of its own cash grants. Based on the regular information exchange between the ICRC field teams and\nthose of other agencies, the target communities are also informed on the planned interventions of ICRC\nand/or other actors.\n\n_**ICRC Grievance Redress Mechanism**_\n\n\n15. **The exchange with beneficiaries concerning their feedback/complaints is done at two main levels as**\n**follows:**\n\n\nPage 70 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary identification",
+ "confidence": 0.865043580532074,
+ "start": 115,
+ "end": 117
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5365926027297974,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "references",
+ "confidence": 0.5744758248329163,
+ "start": 655,
+ "end": 656
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8440675139427185,
+ "start": 734,
+ "end": 735
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 74
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\na) Assistance departments - Field Officers and Program Assistants based in Nairobi\nb) Risk Monitoring Unit Team based in Nairobi\n\n\n16. **The approach adopted by the delegation enables beneficiaries to provide their feedback, complaints**\n**and/or raise questions during and after the beneficiary registration process, during and after the**\n**assistance delivery, including the post-distribution monitoring.** Within the initial exchange with the target\ncommunities, the community members are provided with the mobile phone number of the involved FOs and\nthe central mobile phone number that is in Nairobi office. The latter is indicated on the leaflet that is\ndistributed at the community level and includes general information on the ICRC and its key activities and\napproach in the given context.\n\n\n17. **In situations where the complaints are addressed to the FOs at the field level, or to the central mobile**\n**phone number, the FOs/Program Assistants are responsible to share these with their direct technical**\n**supervisor (Project Manager) through an official message (including beneficiary name(s), contact number,**\n**exact location, concerned intervention type, reason/type of complaint).** Upon the receipt of the complaint,\nthe direct supervisor decides whether the feedback to the concerned beneficiary can be provided through\nthe involved FO, or further direct exchange is required through one of the Program Assistants. In addition,\nthe direct supervisor is responsible to share the exchange on the beneficiaries' complaints with the RMU\nteam.\n\n\n18. **In situations where the reported problems can be solved out at the technical level** (e.g. incorrect\nphone number, absence during the registration process, claim of money not transferred to the concerned\nphone number, lack of clarity on certain selection criteria), the technical supervisor decides on the concrete\nsteps to be taken including the final feedback to be provided to the beneficiary(s).\n\n\n19. **In situations of larger number of complaints from the target community, or specific complaints related**\n**to the approach of the ICRC assistance teams during the assessment/beneficiary registration/distribution,**\n**direct supervisor shares the received messages with the concerned coordinator as to involve the RMU**\n**team on further steps to be taken.** The RMU team then takes over the responsibility for further direct\nexchange with the concerned beneficiaries including the deployment of the field team independent of the\nlocal FOs/field management. Based on the findings of the RMU exchange with the beneficiaries, RMU team\nsubmits the official report with the recommendations to the delegation management on the steps to be\ntaken.\n\n_**Component 1: ICRC Implementation Arrangements**_\n\n\n20. **All activities under Component 1** will be implemented through direct presence of ICRC staff and\nexchange with target communities by the staff in the target areas of intervention, with the Somali Red\nCrescent Society (SRCS) as its main implementing partner for specific activities.\n\n\n21. **Target communities are confirmed through interviews with the representatives of different**\n**population groups (e.g. village elders, woman headed households (WHH), households locally perceived as**\n**‘very poor’, ‘poor’, ‘middle’ and ‘better off’, representatives of different clans/sub-clans and/or minority**\n**groups).** Particular attention is given to the key problems and thereof priorities and needs identified by the\n\n\nPage 71 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "leaflet",
+ "confidence": 0.6912611126899719,
+ "start": 133,
+ "end": 134
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries' complaints",
+ "confidence": 0.7667170166969299,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 304
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5545315742492676,
+ "start": 301,
+ "end": 302
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "received messages",
+ "confidence": 0.5907013416290283,
+ "start": 438,
+ "end": 440
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "official report",
+ "confidence": 0.8766536116600037,
+ "start": 511,
+ "end": 513
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.830416202545166,
+ "start": 512,
+ "end": 513
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "RMU team",
+ "confidence": 0.7071241140365601,
+ "start": 464,
+ "end": 466
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 75
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nabove population groups. Direct exchange with target communities, local authorities, including local and\ninternational humanitarian agencies, is also used to disseminate the ICRC-SRCS approach, its potentials and\nlimitations, as to decide upon the most appropriate response option, or combination of different\ninterventions, including the specific target criteria.\n\n\n22. **While the community representatives (e.g. village elders, local authorities, cooperatives, associations)**\n**play vital role in identification of the most vulnerable groups, assistance priorities and development of**\n**appropriate response, assistance delivery is carried out directly by ICRC field teams based on the internal**\n**beneficiary registration and distribution formats, with the presence of each beneficiary at project site.** All\nbeneficiaries are enabled to contact individually the ICRC staff from the respective region within the\npreparatory phase or after assistance delivery. ICRC leaflets are included in assistance package as to enable\nall beneficiaries to get familiarized with the ICRC approach and have the contact address to which they have\nrefer their complaints or any other feedback on the assistance received and the approach of the concerned\nfield teams. During post-distribution monitoring, ICRC decides on the beneficiaries to be interviewed,\ninvolving the representatives of the local communities/authorities in the monitoring process and exchange\non the monitoring findings. In addition, the internal Risk Monitoring Unit (RMU) is regularly involved in the\nindependent verification of beneficiaries after the registration exercise and confirmation of receipt of\nassistance after the distribution took place.\n\n\n23. **A multidisciplinary team involving ICRC’s economic security, water and health staff conduct field**\n**assessments to determine the scope of the intervention.** These assessments include a combination of the\ndata collection through secondary sources and focus-group discussions, interviews with key informants and\nrepresentatives of different groups from the affected population/communities. In addition to the\nassessment findings, ICRC also maintains exchange with other humanitarian agencies to ensure an effective\ncomplementary approach and avoid overlapping. The exchange with other actors involves primarily the UN\nled Food, Shelter and WASH clusters at central and regional levels. There is regular exchange with the\neconomic security, water and health departments as to optimize the impact of the assistance by integrating\nother components in the eventual response.\n\n\n24. **Food, non-food and cash distribution activities in Sub-component 1.1, are carried out in the field by**\n**ICRC field officers together with the SRCS field officers and volunteers.** ICRC field officers, including Cash &\nMarket officers from Nairobi are deployed on the ground to organize assistance deliveries and monitoring.\nFood and EHI is provided through the contingency stocks of the ICRC warehouses in strategic locations in\nSomalia, including the warehouse in Wajir, north Kenya, which is used for the transfer of food and EHI for\nemergency response in Gedo and northern parts of Lower Juba region in south Somalia.\n\n\n25. **Cash Grants:** For beneficiary identification and targeting for cash distribution, the ICRC uses standard\ntargeting and assessment tools. Basic data is complemented by community based targeting. Information is\ncollected from the field through use of Device Magic Platform whereby ICRC field teams use tablets with\nDevice Magic application for data collection within the assessment and monitoring, beneficiary registration\nand data processing/analysis. Centralized data reviewed to eliminate duplicates (internally within the lists\nand across ICRC programs. For beneficiaries earmarked to be paid through mobile payment, cleaned data\nsend to mobile providers for verification to ascertain the mobile numbers correspond with the beneficiary\nnames. Verification process is complemented with phone calls. Common perceived risks associated with\ncash distributions are the possibility of inclusion of members belonging to state or non-state armed actors or\n\n\nPage 72 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary registration and distribution formats",
+ "confidence": 0.5505524277687073,
+ "start": 141,
+ "end": 146
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8696819543838501,
+ "start": 160,
+ "end": 161
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.8011043667793274,
+ "start": 323,
+ "end": 324
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "affected population/communities",
+ "confidence": 0.9067450165748596,
+ "start": 361,
+ "end": 365
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Device Magic Platform",
+ "confidence": 0.698371171951294,
+ "start": 607,
+ "end": 610
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "ICRC",
+ "confidence": 0.6172371506690979,
+ "start": 471,
+ "end": 472
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Centralized data",
+ "confidence": 0.6856510043144226,
+ "start": 637,
+ "end": 639
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9273179173469543,
+ "start": 654,
+ "end": 655
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 76
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\ndominant clans in the beneficiary list, wrongful beneficiary inclusion or exclusion errors, cases of shared\nmobile numbers, double registration within the programs and across the programs. The chart below\nprovides the payment channel used by the ICRC to provide cash grants.\n\n\n_Chart 3: Payment channels_ [35]\n\n\n26. **Monitoring of food, EHI and Cash distribution interventions will be carried out during the**\n**implementation and based on the initially established geographic and beneficiary targets, post-**\n**distribution monitoring;** monitoring of the beneficiaries of Stabilization Centres that are supported by\nunconditional cash will be carried out on a monthly basis through the sample set in accordance with the\nmonthly beneficiary figures and geographic origin of the beneficiaries.\n\n\n27. **Water supply:** Following the multidisciplinary field assessments carried out by ICRC staff specific water\ninfrastructure projects are identified. These are written up as short project documents indicating: the\nlocation (georeferenced); the objective, nature and justification of the intervention; the security situation;\nwhether other organizations are active in the area; the expected number of beneficiaries (including IDPs);\nthe role of SRCS and timeframe. ICRCs engineers manage small repairs directly while sub-contacting larger\nrepairs and rehabilitation to the private sector through a standard competitive bidding process. ICRC directly\nmanage the procurement and deployment of pumps, generators, spare-parts and storage materials.\n\n\n28. **Hygiene:** ICRC has a train-the-trainer program for hygiene promotion aimed at increasing the capacity of\nSomali Red Crescent Society (SRCS) field staff. SRSC staff in turn deliver hygiene promotion training to\n\n\n35 Note that the mobile and hawala (informal banks) are the two key payment modalities. ‘Hawala’ scheme is\nbased on the vouchers (3rd modality shown above is a subset of hawala) that the selected beneficiaries receive\nprior to the cash delivery. Each beneficiary then presents his/her voucher in person at vendor’s local outlet as to\nreceive cash\n\n\nPage 73 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "monthly beneficiary figures",
+ "confidence": 0.9169027805328369,
+ "start": 146,
+ "end": 149
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7090861797332764,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8402534127235413,
+ "start": 120,
+ "end": 121
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "multidisciplinary field assessments",
+ "confidence": 0.6118086576461792,
+ "start": 167,
+ "end": 170
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "ICRC staff",
+ "confidence": 0.8558484315872192,
+ "start": 173,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5036137104034424,
+ "start": 120,
+ "end": 121
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 77
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\naround 70 percent of people receiving assistance in the form of cash or food. Household water treatment is\ndelivered with ICRC’s non-food items.\n\n\n29. **Implementation of Health Activities:** The project will implement through and complement the already\nexisting ICRC supported SRCS Primary Health Care (PHC) program covering the South Central Zone (SCZ) and\nthe southern part of Puntland. SRCS is the de facto first provider of Primary Health Care for an estimated\ntarget population of about 532,000 people.\n\n\n30. **The project will support 21 fixed clinics and 10 mobile centres distributed into 10 SRCS Branches that**\n**continue to function despite the security constraints.** All of them have Mother and Child Health (MCH) and\nExpanded Immunization Program (EPI) as core activities. The Clinics host the Outpatient Therapeutic\nNutrition Program (OTP). The Nutrition programme will continue to be implemented regularly trough the\ntwo Stabilization Centres (Baidoa and Ksimayo) and in the 21 OTPs, the clinics are distributed in the\nfollowing area: Bay, Banadir, Galgadud, Gedo, Hiran, Middle-Shabelle, Ksimayo, Lower-Shabelle and Middle\nJuba. The project will also respond to the support for the Cholera epidemic in main, two Cholera Centre Unit\nset in Baidoa and Kismayo an additional one is being set up in Bardere. At community level the project will\nsupport ICRC efforts in implementing prevention and health promotion and education activities.\n\n\n_**FAO Component 2 Institutional and Implementation Arrangements**_\n\n\n31. **Component 2 of the proposed SEDRP will be implemented by FAO.** FAO Somalia will be responsible for\nthe implementation of all activities under Component two based on the project design, and the\nprocurement, financial management, disbursement, and safeguards procedures of FAO as the supported UN\nagency will apply. A strong partnership is already in place between the World Bank and the FAO, which has\nenabled successful implementation of previous IDA-financed projects. Moreover, the activities detailed\nunder Component 2 fall under the scope of FAO’s Drought Response and Famine Prevention Plan for 2017,\nwhich aims to provide lifesaving interventions and emergency livelihood support to (i) meet immediate food\nand water needs while rehabilitating productive infrastructure through cash-for-work; (ii) support\nlivelihoods with cash and inputs (Cash+); and (iii) save livestock assets and related food and income.\n\n\n32. **FAO Somalia will be in charge of overall coordination and implementation of project activities in**\n**Component 2 through its field staff and subcontracts with local implementation partners (NGOs, CBOs,**\n**professional associations).** FAO Somalia’s Country Office in Nairobi and Mogadishu, under the leadership of\nthe FAO Representative in Somalia, will provide overall oversight and quality insurance to ensure successful\nimplementation of the project, including all fiduciary aspects, safeguards, monitoring, and reporting of the\nproject’s progress.\n\n\n_**Targeting and Implementation Approach**_\n\n\n33. **Component 2 of the SEDRP will be implemented across all districts that FAO is currently active as part**\n**of its ongoing emergency Drought Response and Famine Prevention program, and where implementation**\n**is possible through local NGO partners.** The concentration of funds and activities for cash transfers and\nagricultural livelihood support will be based on three levels of targeting. First, for district level targeting, FAO\nwill work through the Food Security Cluster to examine IPC Level 3 and 4 caseloads, identifying where needs\nare most urgent and where there are gaps in coverage. Within the districts, through consultations with the\n\n\nPage 74 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Outpatient Therapeutic\nNutrition Program",
+ "confidence": 0.5136197209358215,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 178
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "OTPs",
+ "confidence": 0.7605074048042297,
+ "start": 205,
+ "end": 206
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.7835529446601868,
+ "start": 310,
+ "end": 311
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5283088684082031,
+ "start": 291,
+ "end": 292
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Drought Response and Famine Prevention Plan",
+ "confidence": 0.732820451259613,
+ "start": 402,
+ "end": 408
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5981189012527466,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.6661598086357117,
+ "start": 409,
+ "end": 410
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.7371231317520142,
+ "start": 587,
+ "end": 588
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IPC Level 3 and 4 caseloads",
+ "confidence": 0.8381797075271606,
+ "start": 671,
+ "end": 677
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 78
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nDistrict Commissioner, partner NGOs, and other local stakeholders, FAO determine where response actors\nare operating within the district and where needs are greatest. Finally, FAO will work with NGOs and with\nvillage elders to identify specific needs at the village level, resulting in a list of individual beneficiaries. As\npart of this village-level targeting, FAO will ensure minimum coverage inclusion of women and womenheaded households, as well as other vulnerable groups, including but not limited to elderly and handicapped\nindividuals.\n\n\n34. **To facilitate beneficiary verification when collecting payments, at the time of Identification**\n**beneficiaries will be registered with biometrics (thumbprint) where possible, and registration into the**\n**Form Management Tool, which includes name of household focal person, village, phone number, and**\n**photographs.** Biometric information and photographs will be integrated into the vouchers provided to\nbeneficiaries that must be presented to money vendors for payment distribution. On limited occasions in\nhighly insecure districts, FAO will authorize for biometric data not to be collected, in which case money\nvendors can confirm identity via the photograph.\n\n\n35. **Verification of beneficiary eligibility is conducted through an FAO established Call Centre, which**\n**conducts surveys of Council Members, Elders and beneficiaries by phone.** Initially the survey verifies and\nensures the beneficiaries identified in the selection process meet the selection criteria (male, female, age,\nIDP, HH heads, etc.) of the project. In a second stage, the survey focuses on the work performed (site,\nnumber of days, tools used, type of infrastructure, supervision, payments received from the money vendor,\netc.). In a third stage the Call Centre will focus on further work performed and verifies that the payments or\nbenefits that were to be received by beneficiaries from earlier stages of the project, were in fact received.\nBased on validation and clearances of the Call Centre data, the contractual payments will be made to the\nService Provider (SP) and the beneficiaries. Any diversions or lack of compliance with contractual obligations\nwill result that a payment requested by the SP or due to the beneficiaries will be put on hold until an\nanalysis/evaluation of the results found by the Call Centre is clarified or found to be justified. The payments\ndue to the SP or the beneficiaries will be adjusted in cases where compliance with contractual obligation(s)\nis weak or lacking.\n\n\n36. **Distribution of beneficiary payments will be undertaken through designated money vendor offices,**\n**which will occasionally be requested to travel and make payments directly at the targeted sites, especially**\n**when the villages are located far from the main offices, in coordination with the selected implementing**\n**partners.** This approach to make payments at the village level will be used to ensure that no additional\nburden, such as walking or traveling to distant places, is placed upon the vulnerable populations in need of\nassistance. This is especially key for women who have demanding schedules due to their regular daily\ncaretaking roles within the household, as well as their roles in processing and selling goods. In the cases\nwhere the money vendor must travel, they will be covered for the additional costs of travel, security, and\ndelivery of payments. For other cases in which the village is not located far from the designated money\nvendor, FAO will provide travel allowances to the beneficiaries to collect their payments.\n\n\n37. **At the time of payment, verification of beneficiaries will take place through multiple, complementary**\n**approaches.** Money vendors will be able to verify beneficiaries against biometrics, or through the signed\nbeneficiary list provided by the FAO implementing partner and the Form Management Tool generated list.\nIntegration of beneficiary photographs into the vouchers can serve as an additional verification measure, or\na primary verification measure where biometric information cannot be collected.\n\n\nPage 75 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "list of individual beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.619880199432373,
+ "start": 67,
+ "end": 71
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.710018515586853,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9150816798210144,
+ "start": 70,
+ "end": 71
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Form Management Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.533536434173584,
+ "start": 149,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.5659955143928528,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.888496458530426,
+ "start": 70,
+ "end": 71
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Biometric information",
+ "confidence": 0.8859254121780396,
+ "start": 175,
+ "end": 177
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.5426561236381531,
+ "start": 268,
+ "end": 269
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.840914249420166,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9226235747337341,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 188
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7076391577720642,
+ "start": 268,
+ "end": 269
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "Verification of beneficiary eligibility",
+ "confidence": 0.5676196813583374,
+ "start": 234,
+ "end": 238
+ },
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.7702386975288391,
+ "start": 268,
+ "end": 269
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.7341329455375671,
+ "start": 207,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9143480062484741,
+ "start": 187,
+ "end": 188
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.804774284362793,
+ "start": 308,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "survey",
+ "confidence": 0.8131648898124695,
+ "start": 308,
+ "end": 309
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.7574591636657715,
+ "start": 367,
+ "end": 368
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Call Centre data",
+ "confidence": 0.8615642189979553,
+ "start": 387,
+ "end": 390
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.5990784168243408,
+ "start": 367,
+ "end": 368
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "signed\nbeneficiary list",
+ "confidence": 0.8702325820922852,
+ "start": 722,
+ "end": 725
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO implementing partner",
+ "confidence": 0.8170181512832642,
+ "start": 728,
+ "end": 731
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9756037592887878,
+ "start": 674,
+ "end": 675
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Form Management Tool generated list",
+ "confidence": 0.5704872608184814,
+ "start": 733,
+ "end": 738
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Form Management Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.550920844078064,
+ "start": 733,
+ "end": 736
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9449941515922546,
+ "start": 674,
+ "end": 675
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "beneficiary photographs",
+ "confidence": 0.6877481341362,
+ "start": 741,
+ "end": 743
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9164000749588013,
+ "start": 674,
+ "end": 675
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "biometric information",
+ "confidence": 0.7788218855857849,
+ "start": 760,
+ "end": 762
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 79
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n38. **To provide agricultural inputs as part of the Cash+ livelihood support, vouchers will be utilized in areas**\n**where well-functioning input markets exist.** These vouchers will be serialized and tailored to the needs\nidentified in each district to include the quantity and type of inputs the household is entitled to with the\nvoucher. Traders who will accept the vouchers will be pre-selected at the village level, and will be able to\nclaim payment from the vouchers through the money vendors. Fishing kits provided to riverine\ncommunities under this sub-component will be provided as direct inputs, procured by FAO and delivered\nthrough implementing partners. To facilitate verification of beneficiaries receiving vouchers or fishing kits,\nFAO has introduced photographs of the beneficiaries into the vouchers. For fodder production support, FAO\nwill provide inputs (seeds, land preparation and irrigation as applicable, equipment for harvesting and\nprocessing) and training through local qualified NGOs.\n\n\n39. **Given the migratory nature of pastoralist communities, rather than utilizing the three-level targeting**\n**process used for cash transfer, targeting for livestock support for pastoralists will have to be done based**\n**on a combined understanding of drought affected areas, geographically specific reports of livestock loss,**\n**functional and accessible water points, and typical migratory and trade routes.** FAO will procure and\nposition veterinary drugs, essential vaccines, veterinary supplies, and equipment. These inputs will be\nprovided to veterinary teams, typically belonging to regional veterinary associations, who will be contracted\nto administer treatments and vaccinations. In the central and southern regions, for as far as drugs and\ninstruments for treatment are concerned, procurement from available veterinary input suppliers will be\ndone by the associations themselves against prices and standards pre-established by FAO. To facilitate\nmonitoring by FAO Field Monitors and the FAO Call Centre in Nairobi, the contracted veterinary association\nwill develop a deployment framework and work plan for the veterinary teams to undertake the treatment\nactivities\n\n\n40. **In addition to facilitating monitoring of beneficiary payments, the FAO has established a Hotline**\n**through their Call Center to provide beneficiaries a venue for grievance redressal.** The Hotline telephone\nnumber is communicated by FAO Service Providers (partner NGOs, Money Vendors) to beneficiaries and is\nprinted on all FAO Payment vouchers. Through the hotline number, FAO directly receives complaints,\nrequests for new assistance and other important feedback for programs through a dedicated Call Center\nstaff member. Awareness campaigns of FAO’s programs and benefits are communicated through the local\nradio stations. In addition, the FAO Service Providers, through the agreed contractual engagement,\nundertakes mobilization exercises that further clarifies the FAO Project through posters and meetings with\nelders, local authorities and beneficiaries. The combination of these communication tools has proved to be\npowerful and reliable, particularly because the Hotline number is also included in all of the vouchers, radio\nmessages and on signboards as put near cash-for-work sites, and thus available to all beneficiaries or others\npossible complainants.\n\n\n_**FAO NGO and Beneficiary Selection Criteria**_\n\n\n41. **FAO implementing partner selection is based on the results of a pre-qualification exercise undertaken**\n**by FAO’s Procurement Unit in coordination with sector staff.** The pre-qualified NGOs are requested to\nsubmit financial proposals based on targets at the district level. The lowest bidder is further examined\nthrough well-articulated FAO risk management measures. The selected partners in each district participate\nin an extensive training and inception workshop before being engaged to implement activities.\n\n\nPage 76 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "vouchers",
+ "confidence": 0.5311072468757629,
+ "start": 34,
+ "end": 35
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.7441812753677368,
+ "start": 130,
+ "end": 131
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.792656660079956,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9005639553070068,
+ "start": 141,
+ "end": 142
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "photographs of the beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.6429153680801392,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 155
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.9049073457717896,
+ "start": 130,
+ "end": 131
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8391188383102417,
+ "start": 141,
+ "end": 142
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Hotline telephone\nnumber",
+ "confidence": 0.5524390339851379,
+ "start": 428,
+ "end": 431
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8709240555763245,
+ "start": 418,
+ "end": 419
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Payment vouchers",
+ "confidence": 0.6803727746009827,
+ "start": 451,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "pre-qualified NGOs",
+ "confidence": 0.6158846616744995,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "pre-qualification exercise",
+ "confidence": 0.6368858814239502,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 614
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "pre-qualified NGOs",
+ "confidence": 0.834361732006073,
+ "start": 634,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 80
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n42. **FAO beneficiary target selection is based on IPC projections regularly released by FSNAU.** Based on this\nanalysis, FAO prioritizes rural households in IPC phase 3 and 4 and further actualizes the targets at the\nDistrict level taking into consideration households already covered by other Agencies and where necessary\ncomplement their activities. At the District level, the implementing partner coordinates with district\nauthorities and other implementing agencies to either avoid the villages where others are implementing\ncash and food interventions or to ensure complementarity. FAO also coordinates with the Food Security\nCluster, the World Food Programme and major NGOs on coverage and targeting to avoid coverage gaps and\nduplication. The below criteria apply for identifying households targeted with cash-based interventions:\n\n - Populations in IPC Phases 3 and 4.\n\n - Riverine and agro-pastoral smallholders and fisher folk who depend primarily on subsistence\nfarming/fishing activities in drought-affected areas (primarily targeted with Cash+).\n\n - Pastoralists with small herds, at or below the subsistence level.\n\n - Women-dependent households.\n\n - Households from marginalized and minority clans and sub-clans or ethnic groups.\n\n - Households that are residents of the local village/district or internally displaced people\nrecognized by the host community, and returnees.\n\n43. **The below are beneficiary selection criteria specific to unconditional cash transfer activities:**\n\n - Female headed HHs where the mothers are pregnant and/or lactating.\n\n - Households with disabled persons.\n\n - Vulnerable households that have lost a considerable amount of assets like livestock or crops\n(any loss between 75-100 percent will be considered as significant loss).\n\n - Vulnerable households with children under 5 years (2 or more children under 5 years).\n\n44. **Selection of community water facilities and infrastructure to be rehabilitated through the cash-for-**\n**work program will be determined through discussion between FAO service providers and community**\n**members in the areas targeted for support.** The service provider together with the community will discuss\nthe different possible infrastructures assets that require rehabilitation, and prioritize those assets that will\nbenefit the community at large (excluding privately owned infrastructures). After the communities select\nthe infrastructure assets, for each asset the SP will prepare the bill of quantities indicating the amounts of\nwork needed and the beneficiaries impacted by rehabilitation for approval by FAO.\n\n\n45. **To support the sustainability of the infrastructure rehabilitation works, FAO, through its service**\n**providers and community consultations, will select at least nine people per infrastructure asset to form a**\n**WASH committee that will be responsible to ensure the sustainability of the improved water facilities.**\nThis committee, which must consist of at least three to four women, will be provided training so they have\nthe necessary skills and knowledge to maintain the infrastructure as well as help other community members\nunderstand the importance of proper management, operation, and maintenance of these improved\nfacilities.\n\n\n_**Gender Considerations**_\n\n\n46. **FAO aims to ensure that at least 30 percent of projects’ direct beneficiaries are women. To ensure that**\n**assistance is tailored to the distinct needs and realities of women and men, FAO projects employ gender**\n\n\nPage 77 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IPC projections",
+ "confidence": 0.9435192346572876,
+ "start": 28,
+ "end": 30
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FSNAU",
+ "confidence": 0.9385011792182922,
+ "start": 33,
+ "end": 34
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7197896838188171,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "rural households",
+ "confidence": 0.9021332859992981,
+ "start": 44,
+ "end": 46
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IPC",
+ "confidence": 0.545835554599762,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "bill of quantities",
+ "confidence": 0.9209924340248108,
+ "start": 428,
+ "end": 431
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "SP",
+ "confidence": 0.6277035474777222,
+ "start": 424,
+ "end": 425
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Gender Considerations",
+ "confidence": 0.5040217638015747,
+ "start": 566,
+ "end": 568
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.6694954633712769,
+ "start": 462,
+ "end": 463
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender",
+ "confidence": 0.9210143685340881,
+ "start": 616,
+ "end": 617
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO projects",
+ "confidence": 0.5404098629951477,
+ "start": 613,
+ "end": 615
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 81
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**analysis before activities start to integrate the concerns of women and men of all ages.** The needs\nassessment, design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of FAO’s projects involve single-sex\nconsultations. FAO Somalia has developed a standard operating procedure for gender mainstreaming and\nprovides its implementing partners with gender training, guidelines as well as checklists to ensure the do-noharm principle is observed.\n\n\n47. **To further promote incorporation of gender concerns and prevention of gender based violence,** all\nFAO contracts with partners have standard clauses, which are monitored by the FAO Somalia Compliance\nand Risk Management unit and feedback and project steering information is provided timely to Project\nManagers and Responsible Officers.\n\n\n48. **For the Cash-for-Work component FAO seeks to ensure that rehabilitation sites are close to**\n**homesteads to minimize the burden of walking too far and prioritizes emerging employment**\n**opportunities for women.** The beneficiary selection process is guided by continuous qualitative and\nquantitative gender analysis, through improved geographical targeting upstream and ensuring minimum\nthresholds for the inclusion of vulnerable groups, including minority clans, women-dependent households,\nreturnees/internally displaced people and communities recently affected by shocks or displacement. FAO\nensures that women engage in key project activities, such as trainings and supervision of works. In addition,\na sensitization component and supporting complaint/feedback mechanisms are included in FAO’s cash-forwork program to reduce the risk of gender-based violence. FAO has developed practical gender checklists\nand mainstreaming guidelines that all implementing partners must follow to ensure gender considerations\nare fully adopted in program implementation. FAO has made provisions for vulnerable women and men to\ndesignate an able member of the family to work on their behalf, while remaining the recipients of cash-forwork payments.\n\n\n49. **For the Cash+ component which includes farming inputs and fishing kits, priority will be given to**\n**female headed households and women farmers during the beneficiary selection process.** The input\npackage includes a vegetable seed component – designed to engage women both in the production and in\npromoting vegetable consumption by family members, which will boost nutrition and wellbeing particularly\nof women, children and elderly people. Both men and women engage in riverine fishing, with primarily men\nfishing along the rivers and women involved in the post-harvest handling, preservation, preparation or sale\nof the catch. Importantly, women play a key role in integrating fish into a nutritious household diet. In\naddition to fishing hooks and lines, the kit includes basic fish processing equipment such as knives, a\nchopping board and a cooler that will be primarily used by women. Both men and women will receive\ntraining in the use of the fishing kits.\n\n\n50. **For the livestock support component, the vaccination targets sheep and goats, which – in particular in**\n**agro pastoral systems – are mainly managed by women.** Before the campaign begins, sensitization is\ncarried out at the community level that encourages women to present their animals for vaccination and\ntreatment. Implementing partners are also encouraged to involve women that have the professional\ncapacity to be part of the veterinary teams that treat the animals. Improved animal health makes animals\nmore productive (e.g. milk), which has positive impacts on women’s livelihoods, income, household food\nsecurity and nutrition. Additionally, possible goat restocking interventions deliberately target vulnerable\nfemale-headed households. For the improved fodder production, some of new and existing producers’\n\n\nPage 78 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "gender checklists",
+ "confidence": 0.9175854921340942,
+ "start": 293,
+ "end": 295
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.9512665271759033,
+ "start": 155,
+ "end": 156
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "vaccination",
+ "confidence": 0.7767799496650696,
+ "start": 535,
+ "end": 536
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "sheep and goats",
+ "confidence": 0.5082221627235413,
+ "start": 537,
+ "end": 540
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 82
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\ngroups will be led by women. Fodder production will target areas within acceptable distance from the\nhomesteads, which ensures that women can actively participate.\n\n**Financial Management**\n\n\n51. **The ICRC headquarters is in Geneva with the ICRC Somalia operating directly under the ICRC Geneva-**\n_**Financial Management Regulations June 2016 (DIR2295REV – Appendix 1).**_ The Somalia Delegation\nFinancial management function is headed by Head of Finance and Administration supported by a team of\nfive (5) Accountants based in in Nairobi with Finance and ten (10) Administration Assistants located in\ndifferent field offices in Somalia. Additional _Rules on Financial Management Delegation of Somalia – 2016_\nare in place and they provide specific delegation of authority on financial commitments. Financial\nManagement reporting responsibilities, staffing, functional responsibilities are documented in the various\nHR/FM policies and procedures. The Finance Department works in close consultation with the Logistics\nDepartment particularly in contracts management, commitment control, reconciliation of commitments\nbalances in SUN Accounting System and the Purchasing and Stores Management System. External Finance is\nusually coordinated and channelled through the External Department in Geneva. The shared services centre\nlocated in Manila Philippines performs monthly financial management quality assurance reviews,\nsubsequently the cleared data is uploaded to ICRC Corporate Global system - JD Edwards Financial\nManagement System/ Data Warehouse.\n\n\n52. **The FM function in FAO Somalia is headed by Finance and Administration Officer (Corporate Support**\n**Services Department- CSSD).** The Department is made up of Finance (4 staff), HR (4 staff), Logistics (4) IT (3\nstaff) and Operations & Budget Control. The CSSD work consultatively with technical teams, External Audit\nand Compliance team as well as Operations Department – which coordinates corporate planning and\nprograms implementation including liaison with donors. The Financial Management function is managed\nthrough Financial Programs Management Information Systems (FPMIS) seamlessly integrated to provide\nfinancial data to FAO Oracle based Global Resource Management System. The organization has field offices\nin Mogadishu (South Central Somalia), Hargeisa (Somaliland) and Garowe (Puntland). FAO has over 1,200\nframework agreements with different organizations across Somalia (NGOs, Governments and Community\nBased Organizations, Professional Associations).\n\n\n53. **FAO and ICRC Finance & Administration Departments in close consultation with the project technical**\n**teams in the respective organizations will take leadership in the overall responsibility in the management**\n**of the project financial management function.** The two organizations will take steps to ensure the project\nfinancial management activities are integrated into the existing financial management systems. The\nFinancial Management organizational structures and the related control environment were reviewed and\nfound to be adequate to support the implementation of the project activities.\n\n\n_**Budgeting**_\n\n\n54. **ICRC planning and budgeting process is bottom up and culminates in a resource mobilization annual**\n**budget – “Planning for Results (PfR),” which outlines the costing and prioritized programmatic areas of**\n**interventions.** The project budget shall be prepared as stipulated in ICRC Financial Regulations, in particular\nSection (6) of the Regulations. The budgeting process is fully integrated into the SUN accounting system\nbudget module with well-defined budget formulation, execution and amendment controls. All budget\n\n\nPage 79 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5374041795730591,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8616237044334412,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.8644126653671265,
+ "start": 80,
+ "end": 81
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SUN Accounting System",
+ "confidence": 0.8024901151657104,
+ "start": 205,
+ "end": 208
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financial Programs Management Information Systems",
+ "confidence": 0.9563320279121399,
+ "start": 370,
+ "end": 375
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "FPMIS",
+ "confidence": 0.6563005447387695,
+ "start": 376,
+ "end": 377
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5120340585708618,
+ "start": 385,
+ "end": 386
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial management systems",
+ "confidence": 0.755907416343689,
+ "start": 510,
+ "end": 513
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SUN accounting system\nbudget module",
+ "confidence": 0.5775165557861328,
+ "start": 629,
+ "end": 634
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "budget formulation, execution and amendment controls",
+ "confidence": 0.5679840445518494,
+ "start": 636,
+ "end": 643
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 83
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\namendments/revisions are maintained in the finance system in line with the approved Standard Chart of\nAccount (SCoA) into the system after requisite approvals are provided. The SCoA is standardized across ICRC\ncountries of operations and derived from various dimensional analysis primarily country of operation, target\nprogrammatic population, program/department and object code. Combination of the dimensions make up\nGeneral Objective (Projects/ components). To facilitate budgetary and expenditures tracking, accounting\nand reporting, each project is assigned a unique General Objective Code composed on the various\ndimension analysis:\n\n - Budget - overall ICRC, headquarters or field budget (i.e. earmarked contributions)\n\n - Region - Africa, Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, Near and Middle East\n\n - By context or country for example: Afghanistan, Somalia, Syrian Arab Republic, Ukraine\n\n - By program - Protection, Assistance, Prevention, Cooperation and General (Overheads- Direct and\nindirect costs)\n\n - Combination of one region (or context) and one program for instance, assistance activities in the\nSomalia; prevention activities in Africa\n\n55. **FAO projects budget and expenditures are recognized, recorded, analyzed, summarized and reported**\n**in FPMIS.** The systems provide flexibility to track budget execution reports by donor, project, components\nand sub-components. FAO shall prepare budgets, work plans and cash flow projections in line with\nprovisions of the FAO Financial Management Policies and Procedures.\n\n\n56. **The two organizations (FAO and ICRC) will prepare and submit to the World Bank the project annual**\n**work plans; budget estimates and cash flow forecast (reconciled with the project procurement plans) for**\n**each component/ sub-component and submit for the necessary review and clearance.** The work plans,\ncash flow projections and budget shall include the figures for the year analyzed by month and quarter. The\ncash budget for each month and quarter will reflect the detailed specifications for project sub-components,\nschedules (including procurement plan), and expenditure on project sub-components scheduled by month,\nquarter over the life of the project. For ICRC, a separate schedule of proposed activities and expenditures\nearmarked for retroactive financing shall be provided in separate schedule to facilitate fiduciary review and\nverification. The approved budget estimates shall be posted into ICRC SUN accounting system and FAO\nFPMIS as stipulated in the respective Financial Management Regulations.\n\n\n_Table 10: Budgeting Key Potential Risks_\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|Potential budget expenditure overruns.|The total negotiated budget provisions by components
are specified in the Financing Agreements. The
specified budget amounts by component and sub-
components shall be posted into the respective
organizations (FAO and ICRC) Financial Management
systems. Withdrawal of the grants’ proceeds shall be
restricted
to
the
pre-negotiated
expenditure
categories.|\n\n\n\n57. **Conclusion:** For the purposes of implementing the project, the budgeting arrangements for FAO and\nICRC were found sufficient. The planning and budgeting risk is assessed **moderate** .\n\n\nPage 80 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 84
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_**Accounting and Internal Controls**_\n\n\n58. **FAO and ICRC have a detailed Financial Management Regulations that comprehensively provide**\n**detailed step-by-step guidelines in the management of FM function, specifically donor finances.** The\nRegulations outline policies and procedures on financial reporting calendar, internal controls, accounting\narchitecture, coding structures including SCoA design, cash and banking, payments, payroll, assets and\ninventory, foreign currency management, budgeting, grants management (including overhead cost\nrecovery), sub-awards, insurance and risk management, audit arrangements personnel management and\ncountry operations management. In addition, the two organizations have elaborate Risks Management and\nControl Frameworks that are well documented and operationalized both at the corporate and\nimplementation level. FAO operates an automated Risks Management and Control Framework that works\nclosely and feeds into work of the technical teams, financial managements/compliance as well as\nprogrammatic monitoring and evaluation. Key issues are summarized into a management dashboard to\ninform decision making with a clear escalation mechanism to the FAO Internal Audit Committee and Office\nof the Inspector General (OIG). The Somalia ICRC financial operations as part of the ICRC global are\nsubjected to the corporate internal control and compliance approach built on three pillars: an internal\nControl and Compliance Unit; Financial Controller and Compliance and Quality Assurance Centre in the\nPhilippines.\n\n\n59. **The Accounting and Internal Controls were reviewed and found adequate for the purposes of**\n**managing project financial activities.** The FAO and ICRC external review and control function shall\nmainstream the project activities into their annual work plans. In planning for the reviewers, the internal\nreviewers will adopt a risk based internal audit review approach with special attention to the cash-based\nand voucher based payments undertaken at the local community level in Somalia. The internal audit reports\nrelating to the project activities shall be availed for review to the WB Financial Management team during the\nperiodic implementation support supervision missions. The two entities shall take necessary steps to ensure\nthat:\n\n(i) All important project financial processes are adhered to;\n(ii) Adequate internal controls and procedures are in place;\n(iii) Interim un-audited Financial Reports (IFRs- also to be used as basis for funds draw down) to the\n\nWorld Bank are prepared on a timely basis;\n(iv) The financial statements are prepared on a timely basis and in accordance with the organizational\n\nfinancial management regulations;\n(v) External audits and where necessary (internal audits) are completed on time and audit findings and\n\nrecommendations/ issues raised in the management letter are implemented expeditiously.\n\n_Table 11: Accounting and Internal Controls Key Potential Risks_\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|Due to increased workload, largely due to
rapid scale up leading to potential lapse in
internal controls particularly those related to
cash payments at the community level in
Somalia.|For ICRC, specific preference shall be accorded to
retroactive
financing.
In
reaching
a
definite
determination on the actual amount to be processed
through retroactive financing, due consideration will
be accorded to the fact the ICRC recommends that
donors provide, to the fullest extent possible, un-
earmarked funds. The un-earmarked funding is crucial|\n\n\n\nPage 81 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Financial Management Regulations",
+ "confidence": 0.5397270917892456,
+ "start": 37,
+ "end": 40
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6095459461212158,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "management dashboard",
+ "confidence": 0.9749298095703125,
+ "start": 195,
+ "end": 197
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.982750654220581,
+ "start": 354,
+ "end": 357
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9748253226280212,
+ "start": 351,
+ "end": 352
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Interim un-audited Financial Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8829203844070435,
+ "start": 419,
+ "end": 423
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.8032355904579163,
+ "start": 424,
+ "end": 425
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "financial statements",
+ "confidence": 0.8370763063430786,
+ "start": 452,
+ "end": 454
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6104192137718201,
+ "start": 574,
+ "end": 575
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 85
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n||to maintaining the ICRC’s capacity to operate rapidly
and independently, prioritizing its response on the
basis of the most urgent needs and vulnerabilities of
the people it endeavors to help.|\n|Although
the
document
management
systems across the two organizations were
found to be fairly robust, essential supporting
documentation may not be maintained
particularly
documentation
relating
to
decentralized cash transfer payments in
Somalia.|Given that the FM fiduciary risk is rated high, FM
implementation supervision shall be undertaken at
least once every 3 months. Specific attention to
transactional review and records management and
reconciliation of the expenditures with the Third-Party
Technical Review Reports.|\n|Implementation Fraud and associated Risks.|Recruitment and deployment of Third-Party Review
arrangements focusing inter-alia on specific two
fiduciary aspects: (i) ongoing monitoring of the
payment distribution processes to include financial
compliance, and; (ii) post-transfer monitoring. In
addition, the Third-Party Technical Review will focus
on specific internal control reviews in respect of cash
transfers in particular: (i) analysis and control of the
database of beneficiaries and list of payments; (ii)
review
and
monitoring
selected
payment
agents/volunteers;
(iii)
cash
transfers
financial
management arrangements, funds mechanisms and
related financial reports for payment, and; (iv)
grievance redress mechanism.
The recruitment for the TPTR shall be guided by robust
TOR and Risk based data Analytic Tools.|\n\n\n\n60. **Conclusion:** Internal controls risks are assessed as **high** . The risk rating is largely due to inherent risks\nassociated with conditional and non-conditional cash transfers as well distribution of inputs/ supplies\n(through redeemable vouchers) to the mass target population.\n\n\n_**Financial Reporting**_\n\n\n61. **FAO and ICRC have adequate FM systems and arrangements to provide quality and timely financial**\n**management reports.** FAO and ICRC Heads of Finance at the Country offices in consultation with the\ntechnical teams and their Head Office counterpart staff shall each prepare and submit to the WB SixMonthly Interim Unaudited Financial Reports (IFRs) to the World Bank no later than 45 days after the end of\nthe reporting period. The IFRs, which shall form basis for funds flow draw down shall be prepared in content\nand format as shall be agreed between the WB and FAO and ICRC. During the FM assessments, it was\nconfirmed FAO, FPMIS has the capability to be configured to support generation of the project financial\nreports. ICRC Sun system tracks and reports on expenditures occurred by assigned general objective code. In\ncase a general objective is financed by several partners, the system supports customization of the project\n\n\nPage 82 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 86
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nspecific reports using the SCoA-General Objective Code (GOC) provided the percentage to be charged to\neach partner is defined up front.\n\n\n62. **The ICRC financial reporting is guided by standards for financial and fiduciary management (NAS980**\n**standards).** For the past 14 years, the ICRC has disclosed its financial statements in compliance with\nInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). It provides donors with comprehensive financial\ninformation. The ICRC’s financial control covers fraud risks and it publishes general information about its\norganizational approach to fraud on the ICRC’s donor extranet (a password-protected information portal\nthat donors can access independently), including information on its Compliance and Quality Assurance\nCentre.\n\n\n63. **FAO and ICRC shall configure and create unique project codes or existing ones for ongoing activities in**\n**their respective FM systems to ensure the project specific reports are generated directly from their**\n**systems.** The Six-Monthly Reports shall provide details on all funds received under the project as a whole as\nwell any counterpart funds received under the project (if any). The IFRs shall include a statement showing:\nperiod and cumulative inflows by sources and outflows by main expenditure classifications\n(components/sub-components); beginning and ending cash balances of the project; and supporting\nschedules comparing actual and planned expenditures. Expenditures would be classified by component and\nby sub-component. Semi-annual cash forecast statement should also be included. The IFRs formats shall be\nagreed upon between the WB and FAO and ICRC.\n\n\n_Table 12: Financial Reporting Key Potential Risks_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|Delays in generation and submission of
quality and timely financial reports- Basis
through which additional funds shall be
released from World Bank|In-built flexibility for FAO and ICRC to prepare and
submit demand based IFRs (funds draw down
requests) based on project’s needs.|\n|Internal delays within FAO and ICRC to obtain
necessary budget revisions/amendments in
line
with
the
proposed
components
flexibilities|Budget execution reports will be discussed at the
Project Specific Technical Coordination meetings.|\n\n\n\n64. **Conclusion:** Financial reporting risk was assessed as **moderate** . The risk rating was informed by the\nrobust financial reporting arrangements and procedures in both ICRC and FAO.\n\n\n_**External Audit**_\n\n\n65. **FAO has an audit committee which is appointed by the Director-General and has a membership which**\n**is fully external agreed by the Council on the recommendation of the Director-General and Finance**\n**Committee.** The committee consists of five external members and a Secretary ex-officio. All members and\nthe secretary are appointed by the Director-General. Members are selected on the basis of their\nqualifications as senior audit and/or investigation professionals. The Committee elects its own Chairperson.\nThe Inspector General (IG) provides secretariat services to the Committee. At the discretion of the\nChairperson, the Committee can meet three to four times each year. Additional meetings may be called by\n\n\nPage 83 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SCoA-General Objective Code",
+ "confidence": 0.6039451360702515,
+ "start": 21,
+ "end": 24
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7901539206504822,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "donors",
+ "confidence": 0.898844838142395,
+ "start": 95,
+ "end": 96
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Six-Monthly Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8038163185119629,
+ "start": 199,
+ "end": 201
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.7134721875190735,
+ "start": 229,
+ "end": 230
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Budget execution reports",
+ "confidence": 0.5300596356391907,
+ "start": 444,
+ "end": 447
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "risk rating",
+ "confidence": 0.8709770441055298,
+ "start": 483,
+ "end": 485
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 87
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nthe Chairperson if deemed appropriate. The Committee notes that OIG successfully completed\nimplementing its first Risk-Based Audit Plan for the 2014-2015 biennium. The WB’s audit requirements are\nexpected to be fulfilled through the normal audit function of FAO’s own External Auditors.\n\n\n66. **ICRC’s financial statements are audited on an annual basis by external and independent auditors.** The\nSomalia program is audited as part of ICRC corporate audit with no specific stand-alone audit report issued\non Somalia operations. Two opinions are required for each external audit, and partners are changed every\nfive years to ensure the relationships cannot be compromised. The ICRC has set up bodies, policies and\nprocedures to ensure the proper use of funds granted:\n\n - Code of conduct for employees (including provision on fraud)\n\n - Fraud Policy and Procedures\n\n - Code of Ethics for Procurement\n\n - Functions of Internal Control and Internal Audit (see notably Section 5 of Internal Regulations\nrelated to Internal Audit)\n\n67. **ICRC is open to special audit of the project on agreed terms of reference.** Therefore, the World Bank\nretains the right to request an audit.\n\n\n68. **Similarly, given that ICRC does not undertake a Somalia Delegation specific external audit, ICRC will**\n**provide an audited financial statement specific to IDA funding for ICRC activities in Somalia, which**\n**includes:** i) a disclosure note on expenditures relating to the ICRC’s drought operation in Somalia supported\nthrough Component 1 of SEDRP; ii) Management letter in respect to the statement, and; iii) an audit opinion\non the aspects related to Component 1 of SEDRP, satisfactory to IDA.\n\n\n_Table 13: External Audit Key Potential Risks_\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|ICRC does not undertake country specific
external audit as resource earmarking is not
default mode of ICRC financing mechanisms.
As such, it may not be possible for the WB to
gain an independent external assurance on
the application of the grants’ proceeds|The WB shall agree with ICRC to undertake specific
special audit on the project based on specific terms of
reference (TORs) as shall be agreed between the two
parties. Audit report will be submitted to the WB
within stipulated timelines as shall be agreed between
the WB and ICRC|\n\n\n\n69. **Conclusion:** External Audit was assessed as **moderate** . The risk rating was informed by the robust\nexternal audit at ICRC.\n\n\n_**Cash transfers to beneficiaries**_\n\n\n70. **The total project is US$50 million with US$25.4 million expected to be disbursed using conditional and**\n**unconditional cash transfers through cash supported by biometric registration, mobile phone channel and**\n**voucher based system.** FAO and ICRC have well documented beneficiary targeting mechanisms in place to\nsupport those most impacted by the drought, and to support those communities that are not already\nreceiving it. The two organizations have in place cash transfers procedures that outline: i) beneficiaries\ntargeting and identification – based on eligibility criteria ii) beneficiaries’ enrolment and verification\ncontrols- including classification of beneficiaries by cash transfer type (conditional and unconditional cash\n\n\nPage 84 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audit report",
+ "confidence": 0.9602877497673035,
+ "start": 103,
+ "end": 105
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9170252680778503,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audited financial statement",
+ "confidence": 0.931880533695221,
+ "start": 258,
+ "end": 261
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9192666411399841,
+ "start": 244,
+ "end": 245
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "SEDRP",
+ "confidence": 0.7569904923439026,
+ "start": 302,
+ "end": 303
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7827715873718262,
+ "start": 244,
+ "end": 245
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Audit report",
+ "confidence": 0.8430530428886414,
+ "start": 466,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.531597912311554,
+ "start": 467,
+ "end": 468
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8386821746826172,
+ "start": 531,
+ "end": 532
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "biometric registration",
+ "confidence": 0.6705179214477539,
+ "start": 572,
+ "end": 574
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8998426198959351,
+ "start": 531,
+ "end": 532
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "voucher based system",
+ "confidence": 0.5112403631210327,
+ "start": 583,
+ "end": 586
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.8781029582023621,
+ "start": 531,
+ "end": 532
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "cash transfers procedures",
+ "confidence": 0.7814220786094666,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 630
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "classification of beneficiaries by cash transfer type",
+ "confidence": 0.666050910949707,
+ "start": 654,
+ "end": 661
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "beneficiaries",
+ "confidence": 0.9748215079307556,
+ "start": 635,
+ "end": 636
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 88
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\ntransfers) iii) payments channels and related controls- mobile phone, biometric based cash payments (FAO),\nvoucher based payments- embedded with concealed unique identification numbers that can only be\npresented at the time of payment iv) change management controls v) complaints and grievances\nmechanisms (FAO has an elaborate automated call center based in Nairobi with field office in Hargeisa\nSomaliland). The project will provide support to both ICRC and FAO to scale up ongoing activities across a\nrange of intervention areas. ICRC provides unconditional cash to help to cover essential monthly needs,\nfocusing on food and non-food items. FAO on the other hand provides cash-for-work to drought-affected\nfamilies and “Cash+”, which includes agricultural inputs and training for agro-pastoralists. The project will\nrely on the already existing transfer mechanisms supported by ICRC [36] and FAO to target, enroll beneficiaries,\nchannel funds to the beneficiaries and monitor implementation of cash transfer activities.\n\n\n71. **The project will finance ICRC’s proposed component activities.** However, retroactive financing will be\nup to 40 percent of the overall Project envelope. As a general approach, ICRC undertakes universal targeting\nand does not discriminate beneficiaries on basis of ATF/AML considerations. The following mitigation\nmeasures:\n\n - ICRC will undertake to institute internal control arrangements to ensure: i) expenditures incurred\n(under retroactive financing and in ordinary course of the implementation) are processed in\ncompliance with the assessed ICRC internal controls; ii) for cash transfers and other cash and noncash items, ICRC will exercise its best efforts to ensure that the benefiting persons are not persons\nof interest as outlined in the United Nations Security Council Sanctions List; iii) the expenditures are\nin conformity with the provisions of the PAD and Financing Agreement, and; iv) post-facto special\nexternal audits covering all the ICRC Somalia operations under the project are undertaken.\n\n - FAO: The FAO on their part being a UN Agency under which the debarment conditions apply, are\nexpected to subject their beneficiaries against the Debarment requirements. Express provisions are\nalso included in the Financing Agreement between the WB and FAO.\n\n - Third party review arrangements as shall be agreed between the WB and the Supported Agencies\n(FAO and ICRC) shall undertake sample based periodic ex-post expenditure reviews and verification\nof outputs to provide additional fiduciary assurance. The details and working arrangements for the\nreview shall be outlined in the Terms of Reference (TOR).\n\n - Any ICRC beneficiaries (included in the retroactive and post-active expenditures) that may fall under\nthe debarred list and related expenditures incurred thereof shall not qualify as eligible expenditures\nunder the project.\n\n - Expenditure exclusions on basis of Debarment are stipulated in the Financing Agreement between\nthe WB and ICRC.\n\n_Table 14: Cash Transfers to Beneficiaries Key Potential Risks_\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|AML/ATF Risks particularly cash payments
(Conditional
and
unconditional
cash
transfers). This is compounded by ICRC’s
nondiscriminatory approach with potential
risk of including into the list of beneficiaries’
persons affiliated to potential Al- Shabaab|TOR for the TPTR shall be reviewed and discussed to
take into account measures to address validation of
beneficiaries against UN Debarred list|\n\n\n\n[36 https://www.icrc.org/en/document/somalia-cash-grants-severe-drought-families-food-malnutrition](https://www.icrc.org/en/document/somalia-cash-grants-severe-drought-families-food-malnutrition)\n\n\nPage 85 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 89
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Key Potential Risks|Summary Analysis and Mitigation Measures|\n|---|---|\n|Funds may not be available to beneficiaries
as a result of ineffective cash transfer
arrangement|The WB will rely on the existing cash transfer
arrangements to channel fund to the beneficiaries
since these arrangements have so far proven to be
effective.
Cash transfer arrangements will be periodically
reassessed during the project implementation as part
of audit and financial management implementation
support missions, and risks will be mitigated|\n|Liquidity constraints due to rapid scale up to
meet increased demands of the project|Engagement with the supported agencies, particularly
FAO to consider review and possible revision of WB
Accounts replenishment ceilings based on the
projected cash requirements. In addition, the
supported agencies will be encouraged to prudently
consider increasing the number of PSPs offering
services into Somalia. Consideration and priority
should be given to potentially new areas of operations
with no existing coverage by the current providers|\n|Inadequate financial sector and banking
systems and regulatory framework that may
further exacerbate AML/ATF risks- increasing
the WB’s reputation|Consider
avenues
through
which
opportunities
presented by the new project are linked and
mainstreamed to Use of Country Systems (UCS)
through other WB supported operations through the
Somalia Multi-Partner Funds – Linkages with SCORE
Project|\n\n\n\n72. **Conclusion:** Funds flow and banking arrangements for the projects are assessed as **high** . This is on\naccount of inherent AML/ATF risks coupled by weak nascent unregulated banking and financial sector in\nSomalia.\n\n\n_**Fraud and Corruption**_\n\n\n73. **FAO:** Paragraph 20 of BP 10.00 of the World Bank’s Anti-Corruption Guidelines (ACGs) will be waived in\nfavor of relying on the fraud and corruption procedures of FAO.\n\n74. **ICRC:** The WB and ICRC agreed that the WB’s ACGs will be partially applicable to the ICRC component of\nthe Project, excluding procurements and expenditures falling under ICRC’s global inventory, constituting\nlong-term supply contracts, as duly defined in the Financing Agreement (FA). In addition, ICRC will exercise\nits best efforts to retrofit all ongoing contracts with the application of the ACGs, and will fully incorporate\nthe ACGs in all future non-global procurements to be financed under the Project, beyond the signing date of\nthe FA. In case the retrofitting of ongoing contracts with the ACGs is not possible due to various reasons, it\nwas agreed that the ICRC will unilaterally issue a letter to the concerned vendors (for non-global\nprocurements exceeding US$100,000), notifying them regarding the application of the ACGs to their\nrespective contracts. ICRC will also exercise its best efforts to ensure that all expenditures exclude\nindividuals/entities that are listed in the United Nations Security Council Sanctions List.\n\n\nPage 86 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 90
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_Table 15: Eligibility Criteria for Retroactive Financing_\n\n_**Conclusion and Supervision Plan**_\n\n\n75. **The overall residual FM risk for this operation is assessed high, requiring World Bank implementation**\n**support supervision once every 6 months.** This assumes that the Project oversight, implementation and\ncoordination arrangements shall be centralized within FAO and ICRC. The implementation support\nsupervision will be consistent with a risk-based approach and will involve a collaborative approach through\nthe project implementation arrangements. Additional supervision activities will include desk review of\nquarterly IFRs and internal audit reports, audited Financial Statements and Management Letters as well as\ntimely follow up of issues arising, and updating the financial management rating in the Implementation\nStatus report (ISR) and the Portfolio and World Bank Risk Management (PRIMA) System.\n\n\n_**Disbursements**_\n\n\n76. **Based on respective components cash forecasts and funds for the project shall be disbursed directly**\n**from the World Bank to FAO Head Office (Rome) and ICRC HQ (Geneva).** FAO and ICRC administrative /\noverhead charges will form part of the consolidated budget to be submitted as part of the IFR reporting /\nfunds draw down. However, ICRC overhead is applied at the standard rate of 6.5 percent to actual\nexpenditures. If the actual expenditures are less than budgeted, then the overhead amount applied will be\nadjusted accordingly. The request for funds withdrawal shall be requested through the World Bank Client\nConnection (CC) in line with FAO and ICRC grant withdrawal procedures. FAO Country Office withdrawals\nfunds from Rome based on pre-agreed thresholds/ ceilings (US$1 million). ICRC Somalia delegation funds are\nusually commingled based on the downstream funds demands by the projects. FAO and ICRC FM systems\nhave the capability to track and report withdrawal proceeds receipts, commitments, expenditures and\nbalances. However, the need for ICRC and FAO to open Designated Project Accounts for purposes of this\noperation shall be explored and the following shall be taken into account.\n\n(i) Funds flow and banking arrangements shall be domiciled in a financial institution acceptable to the\n\nWorld Bank [37] . The maximum amounts (ceilings) to be disbursed from World Bank to FAO (Rome) and\nICRC (Geneva) are negotiated and specified in the Disbursement Letter. Due consideration shall be\n\n\n37 On terms and conditions in the World Bank Disbursement Guidelines for Projects (May 1, 2006:11)\n\n\nPage 87 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.5898852944374084,
+ "start": 118,
+ "end": 120
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6924011707305908,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.5875235199928284,
+ "start": 121,
+ "end": 124
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Status report",
+ "confidence": 0.9848570823669434,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.7566021084785461,
+ "start": 151,
+ "end": 152
+ },
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "ISR",
+ "confidence": 0.9646168351173401,
+ "start": 153,
+ "end": 154
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.5079789757728577,
+ "start": 348,
+ "end": 349
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "World Bank",
+ "confidence": 0.5315205454826355,
+ "start": 418,
+ "end": 420
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2006",
+ "confidence": 0.5301384925842285,
+ "start": 476,
+ "end": 477
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 91
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\naccorded to the need to maintain adequate cash to finance the project operations.\n(ii) The fiduciary responsibility and associated risks rests with ICRC and FAO.\n(iii) Initial withdrawal shall be based on negotiated lump sum amount based on the cash forecast.\n\nSubsequent withdrawals shall be based IFR – report based.\n(iv) Project component funds are to be transferred from World Bank to FAO and ICRC against blanket\n\nWithdrawal Applications to be prepared by FAO and ICRC respectively.\n(v) Detailed disbursement arrangements will be documented in the Disbursement Letter.\n(vi) All project expenditures shall be incurred and reported in US$.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPage 88 of 111\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 92
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n77. **The Following disbursement schedule will be followed for each component.**\n\n\n_Table 16: Project Components Disbursement_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|COMPONENT|WORLD BANK DISBURSEMENT (US$ million)|Col3|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|**COMPONENT**|**Jan-Jun 2017**|**Jul-Dec 2017**|**Jan-Jun 2018**|**Total**|\n|**Component 1: Programmatic Support to ICRC for**
**Immediate Drought Response**|**20**|**- **|**- **|**20**|\n|1.1 Meeting Urgent Food Security Needs|13.9|-|-|**13.9**|\n|1.2 Improving Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene|3.6|-|-|**3.6**|\n|1.3 Improving Access to Healthcare and Nutrition|2.5|-|-|**2.5**|\n|**Component 2: Programmatic Support to FAO for**
**Immediate Drought Response and Recovery**|**10.0**|**13.0**|**7.0**|**30.0**|\n|2.1 Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water
Infrastructure Restoration|2.25|3.25|1.13|**6.63**|\n|2.2 Emergency Cash and Agricultural Livelihood Support|3.35|4.79|1.81|**9.95**|\n|2.3 Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods|2.54|3.26|2.5|**8.3**|\n|2.4 Strengthening Disaster Preparedness, Monitoring and
Early Warning Systems|0.66|0.5|0.5|**1.66**|\n|2.5 Project Management|1.2|1.2|1.06|**3.46**|\n|**Project Total**|**30.0**|**13.0**|**7.0**|**50.0**|\n\n\n_**Procurement**_\n\n\n78. **The procurement arrangement under this project is that the FAO and ICRC will use their own**\n**procurement procedures as Alternative Procurement Arrangements (APA) allowed under Section III.F of**\n**World Bank Policy: Procurement under IPF and other Operational Procurement Matters.** This\nimplementation arrangement is recommended based on the fact that the procurement procedures of both\nagencies were assessed and found acceptable to the World Bank. This procurement arrangement is\nconsidered a fit‐for‐purpose arrangement for several reasons:\n\n(a) The two agencies have strong presence on the ground, have proven that they are very well\n\nequipped to work in conflict and post conflict areas in Somalia, and have the capacity to reach\nout to the most affected beneficiaries.\n(b) The procurement activities proposed under this project are within the mandates of FAO and\n\nICRC and already in their existing strategy using the same implementation mechanism.\n(c) The two agencies have a preparedness mechanism, which enables optimal emergency\n\nprocurement response. The agencies are already responding to the drought emergency in\nSomalia\n(d) In addition, FAO Somalia has scaled up its activities to the extent that it has the largest\n\nprocurement portfolio, worldwide.\n(e) Similarly, ICRC have an emergency plan with the possibility of scale-up of renting private\n\nwarehouses and have two ICRC-owned air crafts which are dedicated to Somalia operations,\n\n\nPage 89 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 93
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nbeing used for relief distribution, which is critical for areas that cannot be reached by road due\nhostilities by Al-Shabaab, particularly in the southern part of the country.\n(f) The agencies’ procurement arrangements provide reasonable assurance that the World Bank’s\n\nfinancing will be used for the intended purpose.\n(g) FAO and ICRC are very much informed about the market response locally and internationally\n\nusing their own criteria to register qualified suppliers considering the suppliers’ performance\nand their responses in emergency situations.\n\n79. **The procurement activities under this project will include:**\n\n(a) ICRC: (i) Urgent Food Security Needs (rice, beans, cash to purchase food items and essential\n\nhealth items), and; (ii) Improving access to healthcare, nutrition and clean water.\n(b) FAO: (i) Supporting Livelihood Recovery and Food Security; (ii) Safeguarding pastoral\n\nlivelihoods and assets, and; (iii) Integrating drought resilience into recovery.\n80. **The project is designed to fit within the current activities that have been implemented by both**\n**organizations** . No additional or external capacity would be required to undertake procurement under the\nproposed project. ICRC has already conducted procurement for all activities under Component 1 of the\nproject and WB financing for these contracts will be within the limits specified in the Financing Agreement.\n\n\n81. **Project Procurement Strategy for Development (PPSD):** In accordance with paragraph 12(a) of OP 10.00\nInvestment Project Financing, preparation of the PPSD will be deferred to the project implementation\nphase. This deferment is also justified as the two organizations are already responding to the drought; with\nlocal and international vendors already identified for the required interventions.\n\n\n82. **Procurement Plan** : The Procurement Plan for Component 2 of the project, prepared by FAO will outline\nthe procurement procedures to be used and help to plan and monitor implementation of implementation\nplan. The initial Procurement Plan for the project detailing the activities to be carried out during the first 6\nmonths of the project will be cleared by the World Bank. The World Bank is discussing the draft PPSD and\nProcurement Plan with FAO and these will be finalized and agreed during implementation, in accordance\nwith paragraph 12(a) of OP 10.00 Investment Project Financing, preparation of the Procurement Plan will be\ndeferred to the project implementation phase. The procurement plan will: (i) provide a brief description of\nthe activities/ contracts for the goods, works, and services, (ii) have the selection methods to be applied; (iii)\nhave estimated cost of each individual contract; (iv) provide key time schedules; and (vi) include any other\nrelevant procurement information. The format for the procurement will primary based on FAO’s standard\nprocurement plan format. The World Bank has reviewed the format and found it to be acceptable, meeting\nthe above minimum requirements.\n\n\n83. **Publication (Advertising):** The borrower is required to prepare and submit to the World Bank a General\nProcurement Notice. The WB will arrange for its publication in _United Nation Development Business online_\n_(UNDB online)_ and on the WB’s external website. This will assist in sensitizing vendors not already registered\nwith the vendor databases for the two organizations. Specific Procurement Notices (SPNs) will be published\nin line with the procurement rules, regulations and procedures for the organizations; for example, United\nNations Global Marketplace (UNGM) for FAO.\n\n\nPage 90 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 94
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n84. **Procurement Assessments:** Procurement assessments were conducted for both organizations and the\nfindings are outlined below:\n\n\n85. **FAO:** The procurement assessment of FAO Somalia has been carried out to supplement a previously\nconducted fiduciary system assessment of FAO Headquarters (HQ) that was part of the WB’s approval on\nMay 10 [th] 2017 of the Standard Agreements for Delivery of Output. The summary of the key aspects of FAO\nSomalia Delegation’s procurement setup is summarized below:\n\n(a) In line with FAO’s Administrative Manual, procurement for country delegations is all handled in\nthe local delegation office (up to US$100,000) and Headquarters (above US$100,000). However,\nfor Somalia, the procurement is all handled by the Somalia Procurement Unit, primarily based in\nNairobi. However, due to the capacity of the Nairobi Procurement Unit, headed by an\nInternational Procurement Officer, this threshold is US$500,000. On top of this, due to the\ncapacity, procurement above US$500,000 threshold is still conducted in Nairobi but reviewed\nand cleared by HQ. This makes implementation much faster.\n(b) The Procurement unit has 9 staff, 8 based in Nairobi and 1 assistant based in Somalia. The head\nhas over 20 years of experience, including World Bank procurement procedures. The average\nexperience for the rest of the staff is 5 years. They receive internal training on how to conduct\nprocurement using FAO procedures. Although this Project will almost double the work load, the\nProcurement Unit made assures of being able to handle the additional volume of work. If\nnecessary, more staff can easily be deployed from other units\n(c) FAO uses vendors who are in the data base and UNGM. There is no public advertisement of\nSPNs generally. However, sometimes FAO advertises on UNGM, to get more suppliers. Similarly,\nthere is no contract award publication but after a while, HQ publishes on FAO website and\nUNGM contracts awarded.\n(d) Bidders who are not successful are informed through a letter but they are not told who was the\nwinner and how much was the contract. If they want to know the details, they have to wait for\nthe periodic publications indicated above.\n(e) There is no public opening of bids, irrespective of the value.\n(f) Record keeping was assessed and found to be very satisfactory.\n(g) Procurement Progress Reports are prepared by FAO, for internal monthly monitoring of the\nprogress, for the Somalia Management delegation and on a quarterly basis for its Headquarters.\n\n86. **ICRC:** ICRC is a neutral, impartial and independent humanitarian organization, which has a mandate to\nhelp and protect people affected armed conflict and other violence.\n\n(a) One of the options that has been discussed with ICRC in terms of procurement arrangements, is\nthe use of Alternative Procurement Arrangements (APA), whereby the WB would rely on ICRC’s own\nprocurement rules and procedures under the project, as allowed by the Procurement Policy Section III.\nF. For that purpose, the WB has reviewed ICRC’s procurement framework and organization for\nacceptability.\n(b) On the basis of documentation received from ICRC, the following requirements of the WB’s core\nprocurement principles have been met:\n\ni. Planning (Value for Money, Economy, Efficiency, Fit-for-purpose)\nii. Bidding Process (Transparency, Integrity, Fairness)\n\n\nPage 91 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "fiduciary system",
+ "confidence": 0.6756016612052917,
+ "start": 63,
+ "end": 65
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.8974096775054932,
+ "start": 87,
+ "end": 88
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "country delegations",
+ "confidence": 0.6653878092765808,
+ "start": 129,
+ "end": 131
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Procurement Progress Reports",
+ "confidence": 0.9886061549186707,
+ "start": 485,
+ "end": 488
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "internal monthly monitoring of the\nprogress",
+ "confidence": 0.732080340385437,
+ "start": 494,
+ "end": 500
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FAO",
+ "confidence": 0.8549729585647583,
+ "start": 491,
+ "end": 492
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9762837886810303,
+ "start": 503,
+ "end": 504
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 95
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\niii. Evaluation and award: (Fairness)\niv. Contract Management: (Fairness)\n(c) The ICRC procurement processes were also checked against the following World Bank\nGovernance requirements, which were all met:\n\ni. [Accountability – covered in the ICRC Code of Ethics in Procurement.](https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-code-conduct-purchasing-goods-and-services)\nii. [Conflict of Interest - covered in the ICRC Code of Ethics in Procurement.](https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-code-conduct-purchasing-goods-and-services)\niii. Eligibility – covered in the Logistics Field Manual Chapter 4 (Procurement). ICRC has also\n\nagreed to observe the WB’s Sanctions Framework.\nFor contracts that will fall outside agreed retroactive financing:\niv. Complaints: ICRC has an incipient system to receive and process complaints. This system may\n\nneed to be enhanced. For new procurements beyond Project signing to be financed by the\nWB, if any, this system should be augmented by enabling bidders to contact the World Bank if\na complaint arises.\nv. Non-Compliance: The General Conditions on Purchasing should address how to deal with\n\ncases of non-compliance.\nvi. Fraud and Corruption: There is a link on the ICRC web site/homepage to report F&C issues. For\n\nany new non-global [38] procurement (if any to be financed by the WB) bidders and consultants\nsubmitting bids/proposals will be required to accept application of, and agree to comply with\nthe WB’s ACGs, through a template for “Letters of Acceptance” which the WB has devised.\nFurther to this, ICRC has further agreed to allow the WB to conduct audits/investigations,\nwhen necessary.\n(d) Procurement for Somalia is all handled in Nairobi by the Logistics Unit, headed by the Logistics\nCoordinator.\n(e) The Logistics unit has 31 staff, 17 based in Nairobi and 14 based in Somalia.\n(f) Most of the procurement is through Framework Agreements: Fuel, Transport, Warehousing and\nCash Transfers.\n(g) For food items, Framework contracts are not used because generally no one can offer prices\nvalid more than a few days.\n(h) ICRC mostly uses vendors who are in the ICRC data base, after they go through a registration\nprocess, which includes their capacity (turnover), equipment availability, personnel, what they supply,\netc.\n(i) The field staff generally assist with collection of quotations from Somalia-based vendors (after\nthe process is launched from Nairobi). They also assist with verification of delivery of items by vendor.\n(j) ICRC Somalia also has two aircrafts which are used for distribution.\n(k) Record keeping was assessed and found to be very satisfactory. However, files for completed\ncontracts are then transferred to Manila.\n\ni. A list of all such contracts to be submitted for reimbursement shall be submitted to the WB\nin advance indicating for each contract: (a) Contract description; (b) Date of start of\n\n\n38 ICRC’s “Global Inventory” means all items procured for and held in neutral inventory in an ICRC Warehouse. “Neutral\nInventory” means Inventory that is procured and held in an ICRC Warehouse for future operations without being yet allocated\nto an ICRC General Objective.\n\n\nPage 92 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "system",
+ "confidence": 0.5678617358207703,
+ "start": 150,
+ "end": 151
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WB",
+ "confidence": 0.5333961248397827,
+ "start": 273,
+ "end": 274
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "bidders and consultants",
+ "confidence": 0.6758671402931213,
+ "start": 252,
+ "end": 255
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ACGs",
+ "confidence": 0.5967977046966553,
+ "start": 276,
+ "end": 277
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "WB",
+ "confidence": 0.6105775237083435,
+ "start": 168,
+ "end": 169
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "bidders and consultants",
+ "confidence": 0.6797811985015869,
+ "start": 252,
+ "end": 255
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ICRC data base",
+ "confidence": 0.9825213551521301,
+ "start": 414,
+ "end": 417
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.873285174369812,
+ "start": 319,
+ "end": 320
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "vendors",
+ "confidence": 0.7521384954452515,
+ "start": 409,
+ "end": 410
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Global Inventory",
+ "confidence": 0.6470293998718262,
+ "start": 567,
+ "end": 569
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 96
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nprocurement process; (c) Date of contract award; (d) Supplier/contractor/consultant\nawarded (with registration country); (e) contract amount; (f) expected contract completion\ndate, and; (g) location of the complete procurement file (city and country).\nii. A procurement post review shall be carried out by the WB on a sample basis. The sample\nsize shall be at least 10 percent of the contracts in number and total value.\n\n87. **Procurement Risk:** The overall project procurement risk was assessed to be **moderate** . The mitigation\nmeasures agreed with the supported agencies are summarized in Table 17 below.\n\n\n_Table 17: Procurement Risks and Mitigation measures_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Risk|Mitigation Measure|Timeframe|Responsibility|\n|---|---|---|---|\n|Likelihood of inadequate
number of FAO
procurement staff to handle
project activities|Assign more staff from other FAO
units|Within three
months of project
effectiveness|FAO|\n|Inadequate advertising for
new vendors to participate
in procurement processes|Publication of the GPN and
Procurement Plan on UNDB and
WB’s external website to allow
registration of more vendors|Immediately after
successful
negotiations|FAO / World
Bank|\n|Lack of adherence to the
WB Anti-Corruption
Guidelines by bidders /
proposers / consultants
|Bidders, proposers and
consultants submitting
bids/proposals should be required
to accept application of, and agree
to comply with the WB’s ACGs,
through signing “Letters of
Acceptance”, included in
solicitation documents|During
Implementation|FAO|\n|Lack of adherence to the
WB Anti-Corruption
Guidelines by bidders /
proposers / consultants
|FAO/ICRC to allow the WB to
conduct investigations on
bidders/proposers/consultants,
when necessary|During
implementation|FAO / ICRC|\n|Delayed access of ICRC
procurement records for
post procurement reviews
by the WB|Procurement files for contracts
financed under the Project shall
be maintained in such a way that
they can easily be identifiable and
reviewed at the location where
they are|During
implementation|ICRC|\n|Likelihood of firms /
individuals debarred by the
WB participating in the
FAO/ICRC procurement
process|FAO/ICRC to observe the WB’s
debarred and temporary
suspension lists|During
implementation|FAO / ICRC|\n\n\nPage 93 of 111\n\n\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 97
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n88. **Frequency of Procurement Supervision** : It is recommended to have one procurement implementation\nsupport mission every six months to visit the field to verify compliance to agreed mitigation measures\noutlined above.\n\n**Environmental and Social (including safeguards)**\n\n_**Safeguards Action Plan**_\n\n\n89. **Component 1 triggers OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment and Component 2 triggers OP 4.01**\n**Environmental Assessment as well as OP 4.09 Pest Management.** Initial evaluation of the scope of activities\nand potential scale of impacts from goods provisioning and rehabilitation activities have assigned the Project\nenvironmental category B. Component 1 has been cleared for retroactive financing with the completion of\nenvironmental due diligence as detailed below.\n\n\n90. **Component 1 environmental due diligence reviewed potential adverse impacts related to the**\n**Component works, as well as application of measures for managing, mitigating and monitoring**\n**environmental impacts during project operation.** Sub-component 1.1 (food, non-food items (NFIs) FI, and\ncash) has been fully distributed; ICRC has strict procurement systems for assuring quality consumables for\npurchase, transport, and distribution. Sub-component 1.3 (healthcare and nutrition funding) financed\nnutritional foodstuffs, salaries, trainings, transport, and US$100,000 of medications. The medications\ntreated cholera/AWD: oral rehydration salts (ORS), zinc treatment, antibiotics, and ringer lactate (RT) for\nfluid and electrolyte replacement. All are taken orally except the RT, which is intravenously (IV)\nadministered. No medications financed required refrigeration or syringe administration. The ICRC cholera\ntreatment centers supported through retroactive financing are primary health centers, which perform no\nsurgeries, and administer only oral and IV drugs. These centers have working incinerators; the incinerated\nremains are then buried in pits, overlain with cement. Additionally, ICRC has a strict medical waste\nmanagement plan for the purchase, transport, storage, use, and disposal of medicine which meets World\nBank safeguards requirements.\n\n\n91. **Sub-component 1.2 financed training, chlorine tables, chlorination of water points, and borehole**\n**repair and rehabilitation. Forty-Eight out of the fifty ICRC borehole interventions financed replacement**\n**generators, pumps, pump parts, or extension of keyhole troughs for existing boreholes.** Two replacement\nboreholes were drilled 10 to 20 meters from the existing collapsed boreholes, making use of the existing\ndistribution systems. For all ICRC borehole work, borehole camera tests and water quality tests precede any\ndecisions on rehabilitation. ICRC will cap boreholes with unacceptable water quality and/or irreparable\ndamage. ICRC currently helps communities manage 4,000-5,000 boreholes, which includes borehole\noperator training as well as periodic water testing and minor maintenance.\n\n\n92. **Design and implementation of Component 2 activities will be supported by an ESMF, which will act as**\n**a guide to manage potential adverse impacts and consist of a set of methodologies, procedures and**\n**measures to facilitate adequate environmental management (risk management and impacts) related to**\n**the works financed under the project and whose specific location is unknown or may change during**\n**project implementation.** It will: (i) establish procedures for screening all proposed sub-projects for their\npotential adverse environmental and social impacts; (ii) specify measures for managing, mitigating and\n\n\nPage 94 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 98
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nmonitoring environmental impacts during project operation; and (iii) outline training and capacity-building\narrangements needed to implement the ESMF provisions.\n\n\n93. **Project activities that would trigger environmental impacts include:** repairing water catchments and\nwater points; water harvesting, water trucking and water storage infrastructure; constructing contour bunds\nto control erosion; shoring up breaks in river embankment to decrease flooding; rehabilitating small-scale\nirrigation canals; distributing seeds, cuttings, rangeland cubes, water bladders and fishing kits; and procuring\nlivestock vaccines and emergency supportive treatment goods.\n\n\n94. **Negative environmental impacts may include the following:** decrease in water balance, conflict in use\nof water resources, noise nuisance, soil erosion, dust emissions, and increased pressures on agricultural\nlands, grasslands, and fish stocks. In general, the extent and significance of the negative impacts will be\nlocalized and could be managed with appropriate generic Environmental and Social Management Plans\n(ESMPs) during the planning and implementation of sub-projects. No site-specific sub-project ESMPs will be\nprepared. Project activities that construct new boreholes, require land acquisition, or compensation and\nresettlement of displaced persons will be screened out and strictly avoided.\n\n\n95. **The ESMF will include a Pest Management Plan to ensure that livestock vaccines and medications are**\n**procured and administered in accordance with the FAO/WHO International Code on Pesticide**\n**Management.** Similarly, any fishing kits procured and distributed will be vetted with the FAO Code of\nConduct for Responsible Fisheries and related technical guidelines.\n\n\n96. **The ESMF will also include a supervision, monitoring, and reporting plan and budget for**\n**environmental safeguards.** It is expected that safeguards supervision will be incorporated into the overall\nTPTR contract to be financed through Sub-component 2.5. TPTR will be supplemented by reporting from\nFAO-Somalia staff as well as local technical affiliates of FAO.\n\n\n97. **SEDRP will not allow commencement of any Component 2 civil works until the project ESMF has been**\n**disclosed publicly** on the FAO and World Bank websites. The deferment of ESMF disclosure is linked to a\nlegal covenant in the project Financing Agreement.\n\n**Monitoring and Evaluation**\n\n\n98. **Monitoring and Evaluation.** The ICRC and FAO will be independently responsible for their own program\nmonitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the Project, using the Project’s results framework to issue quarterly\nupdates on the overall project implementation and results. The ICRC and FAO will be responsible to set up a\nResults Monitoring System that will allow to report on the Results Framework and any related outcome and\nimpact information for the project.\n\n\n99. **The Results Monitoring System for ICRC will include data from each sector** : Economic Security\n(EcoSec), Water/Sanitation, and Health. The monitoring system has a two-pronged approach: 1) the internal\ndata collection and analysis by the EcoSec team through regular field assessment visits and market survey\nthat is conducted in 14 regions on a monthly basis; 2) the exchange with the relevant stakeholders such as\nSRCS, communities, local associations and NGOs, different governmental authorities at the field and central\nlevel, the UN led Food/Nutrition and Shelter clusters at the regional and central levels, including specialized\n\n\nPage 95 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "generic Environmental and Social Management Plans",
+ "confidence": 0.5418691635131836,
+ "start": 186,
+ "end": 192
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "ESMF",
+ "confidence": 0.5116762518882751,
+ "start": 313,
+ "end": 314
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Results Monitoring System",
+ "confidence": 0.9516013860702515,
+ "start": 503,
+ "end": 506
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "14 regions",
+ "confidence": 0.7366335988044739,
+ "start": 590,
+ "end": 592
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "market survey",
+ "confidence": 0.5566000938415527,
+ "start": 584,
+ "end": 586
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "14 regions",
+ "confidence": 0.6997919678688049,
+ "start": 590,
+ "end": 592
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "UN led Food/Nutrition and Shelter clusters",
+ "confidence": 0.5810651183128357,
+ "start": 627,
+ "end": 635
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 99
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nagencies such as FSNAU and FEWSNET. ICRC will submit to the WB technical reports on the project activities\nand progress. The bi-annual report includes the interim reporting format that is currently being used to\nreport to other donors. In addition, ICRC will also provide an end of project report including information on\nachievements and impacts, which will be based on M&E tools used by ICRC. Use of a limited Third-Party\nTechnical Review to complement ICRC M&E due diligence on the project results and processes will also be\nconsidered.\n\n100. **In addition to the FAO’s robust M&E system, the project will deploy an independent Third-Party**\n**Technical Review (TPTR) to assess overall project implementation and impact.** The Terms of References\n(ToRs) will be developed and agreed upon with FAO Somalia. The TPTR will be hired and managed by FAO in\nline with the TORs and the reports will be shared with the WB, and will include actions taken to address\nimplementation issues identified by the TPTR. In addition, FAO will submit to the WB technical report on the\nproject activities every three months via an agreed upon template.\n\n101. **Currently FAO M&E conducts multiple impact assessment studies for the project they implement** :\nBaseline Surveys, Post-Distribution Assessments and Impact Assessments. The Baseline Surveys, conducted\nregularly, will employ a hybrid approach that uses FAO Field Monitors (currently about 15 across Somalia)\nand an independent consulting firm as a Service Provider which is contracted and overseen by FAO. The use\nof out-sourcing contractor will increase the study access by reaching districts that are inaccessible to FAO\nstaff and by reaching more locations and households for studies that require a relatively high sample size.\nFAO Field Monitors facilitate the collection of reliable data, as well as verify the implementation of activities.\nRemote-sensing (comparison of high-definition satellite images and aerial pictures to confirm execution of\nthe rehabilitation works), biometrics (registers and identifies beneficiaries through digitization and\nrecognition of their thumb-print), GPS photography (photographs with GPS coordinates are required from\nthe project sites) and a call center (conducts beneficiary, community leaders, trader and pricing surveys on\nthe phone; hotline that receives and records complaints as part of the accountability to affected populations\nincluding raising awareness of Protection Against Sexual Exploitation and Abuse - PSEA) are key tools for\nverification and administration to ensure all beneficiaries have been reached and have received the expected\nsupport of the right quantity and quality and on time. Data generated is maintained by the Information\nManagement Unit, which has developed a database software, the Form Management Tool (FMT). The PostDistribution and Impact Assessments will assess the extent to which the program objectives of rehabilitating\ncommunity level productive infrastructure, inputs, and providing cash income to improve food security has\nbeen performed. An Impact Assessment [39] to evaluate the project will be conducted once all data has been\nanalyzed, programs implemented and results validated by FAO Somalia.\n\n\n39 The impact assessment report shall present the detail evaluation include key number such as Food Consumption\nIndex, the dietary diversity score and the increase in Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU). The data collection will likely be\nusing the RIMA-based questionnaire (RIMA – Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis)\n\n\nPage 96 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "bi-annual report",
+ "confidence": 0.5064570903778076,
+ "start": 40,
+ "end": 42
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9327977299690247,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "end of project report",
+ "confidence": 0.6037927269935608,
+ "start": 66,
+ "end": 70
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.519136905670166,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Baseline Surveys",
+ "confidence": 0.9090134501457214,
+ "start": 260,
+ "end": 262
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8154984712600708,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "FAO Field Monitors",
+ "confidence": 0.6049456000328064,
+ "start": 283,
+ "end": 286
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7685608267784119,
+ "start": 174,
+ "end": 175
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Form Management Tool",
+ "confidence": 0.6396147012710571,
+ "start": 507,
+ "end": 510
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": {
+ "text": "FMT",
+ "confidence": 0.756007730960846,
+ "start": 511,
+ "end": 512
+ },
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8264256715774536,
+ "start": 576,
+ "end": 577
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "RIMA-based questionnaire",
+ "confidence": 0.9953522682189941,
+ "start": 620,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "named",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "questionnaire",
+ "confidence": 0.5938493013381958,
+ "start": 621,
+ "end": 622
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "RIMA",
+ "confidence": 0.5249187350273132,
+ "start": 623,
+ "end": 624
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 100
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n_Chart 5: FAO Third-Party Technical Review_\n\n\n\nPage 97 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 101
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 3: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS**\n\n\n**COUNTRY: Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n\n1. **The economic analysis conducted as part of the project preparation process suggests that the**\n**proposed interventions under sub-components 1.1, 2.1 and 2.3 are economically feasible.** The\ntypology of interventions for sub-components 1.1, 2.1 and 2.3 were selected based the longer stream of\nbenefits which would accrue from the interventions being undertaken. The typology of interventions are\nexpected to lead to positive economic rates of return, largely in excess of the discount rate of 6 percent\nassumed for these interventions, by: (i) saving human lives; (ii) reducing the incidence of malnutrition;\n(iii) reducing expenditures on drugs and medical care; (iv) enhancing the quality of life of the population;\n(v) saving livestock; (vi) enhancing the quality of the livestock; and (vii) enhancing productive assets for\nagro-pastoralists through rehabilitation.\n\n\n2. **The following assumptions have been made towards the economic analysis of sub-**\n**components 1.1, 2.1 and 2.3:**\n\n(i) Valuation of costs and benefits: based on market and shadow prices;\n(ii) Appraisal period: a 15-year appraisal period is selected for projects due to the effect of the\ninterventions on saved lives, and;\n(iii) Discount rate: a 6 percent discount rate is applied.\n\n\n_**Sub-Component 1.1: Meeting Urgent Food Security Needs (US$13.9 million**_ _)_\n\n3. **This sub-component will finance the distribution of food, household items, and unconditional**\n**cash to drought-affected populations, especially in hard-to-reach areas.** Under this typology, 570,000\nbeneficiaries will be provided with at least two meals per day for a period ranging between one to three\nmonths, until they can cover their needs independently and are less vulnerable to drought. This typology\nof intervention would remain economically feasible with a minimum of 55,100 beneficiaries or at a\nmaximum cost of US$143.7 million.\n\n\n_**Sub-component 1.2: Improving access to water, sanitation and hygiene (US$3.6 million)**_\n\n\n4. **Every dollar invested in the proposed water infrastructure and hygiene activities is estimated**\n**to generate an annual return of almost US$11.** These gains are primarily observed in the water\ninfrastructure sub-component, where a total investment of US$2.5 million will target delivering water\nservices for an estimated 300,000 beneficiaries by constructing storage facilities and rehabilitating\nboreholes and hand-dug wells, with the major focus within this sub-component consisting on\n\n\nPage 98 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 102
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nrehabilitating boreholes. Specific support can include re-drilling the borehole, purchasing or fixing\ngenerators, installing submersible pumps, building animal troughs, or installing storage facilities.\n\n\n5. **The economic return generated from this activity may be considered for the two components.**\nOn the component on access to water, the economic return is explained by the cost savings generated\nfrom relying on hand-dug wells and boreholes instead of purchasing water from water trucks, which is\nestimated at US$120 per person per year, or an estimated US$36 million for 300,000 beneficiaries\nannually. The direct economic benefits of investments in hygiene, on the other hand, accrue to\nemergency response teams who can help prevent disease instead of allocating resources to treat\ndisease, while indirect economic benefits accrue to beneficiaries in the form of improved health and\nproductivity. The direct savings are calculated on the basis of savings gained by preventing cholera and\ndiarrhea in the target population. Emergency response teams would need to spend at least US$500,000\non treating cholera and distributing ORS within the target population compared with investing US$1.1\nmillion on preventative measures. However, the indirect returns in the form of improved health and\nproductivity are estimated to be between US$3-30 for every dollar invested in providing clean drinking\nwater according to the WHO. This translates to economic returns of at least US$3.3 million on an\ninvestment of US$1.1 million. The total economic return on investing in hygiene and water treatment is\ntherefore at least US$2.7 million.\n\n\n_**Sub-component 2.1 – Cash-for-Work for Immediate Food Needs and Water Infrastructure**_\n_**Rehabilitation (US$6.63 million)**_\n\n6. **To prevent famine by shoring up food access and water-related assets, this typology of**\n**intervention will support the scaling up of FAO’s ongoing cash-for-work programs.** FAO’s cash-for-work\nprograms provide cash relief. Identified benefits are positive effects of saved lives, the reduced\nmalnutrition on productivity, value of rehabilitation of productive assets and higher quality of life, and\nreduced expenditures of individuals on drugs and medical care. Some 12,900 beneficiaries are estimated\nto benefit from the cash-for-work program, with an estimated average benefit of US$132 per month\nover 3.5 months. This typology of intervention would remain economically feasible with a minimum of\n9,700 beneficiaries or at a maximum cost of US$8.5 million.\n\n_**Sub-component 2.3 – Restoration of Pastoral Livelihoods (US$8.30 million)**_\n\n7. **This sub-component will support FAO to:** (i) vaccinate sheep and goats against common\ndiseases; (ii) provide emergency supportive treatment to livestock (all species), including the provision\nof multivitamins, deworming, ecto-parasite control and antibiotic treatments; and (iii) restocking of goat\nand sheep. This typology of intervention will provide 2.9 million sheep and goat with treatment and\nvaccination at a unit cost of US$0.40 and US$0.30, respectively. This typology of intervention would\nremain economically feasible at a maximum cost of US$56.0 million.\n\n\n8. **The sensitivity analysis** performed indicates that the economic rate of return for interventions\nunder Component 2 remain significant even if potential downside adjustments to the economic\nassumptions made were to materialize.\n\n\nPage 99 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 103
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n9. **Rationale for public sector engagement.** The interventions identified under the Somalia\nEmergency Drought Response and Recovery Project will address the urgent food and nutrition\nrequirements of the most vulnerable segments of the population and sustain agro-pastoral production,\nand bear positive externalities on the overall population through numerous direct and indirect benefits\nbeing engendered. The direct benefits of this Project include saved human lives, decreased livestock\nmortality, increased and sustained milk production, and sustained agricultural production of maize,\nsorghum and cereal. The indirect benefits of this Project are decreasing the incidence of malnutrition\nand starvation across all segments of the population and, most notably, among youth, female and\nelderly population, providing more affordable access to potable water, improving the technical capacity\nof agro-pastoral production, easing tensions between host and IDP communities, and improving\nmonitoring of 3,700 strategic sources in the country. These justify the rationale for public sector\nengagement.\n\n\n10. **Value-added of World Bank support** _**.**_ The World Bank has extensive international experience in\nareas such as agro-pastoral production, water access and water sanitation, health and nutrition, and\nsocial development. Moreover, it has extensive knowledge of the local conditions and the key\nstakeholders involved in the stabilization and recovery of Somalia through its presence in the Kenya\nCountry Office. These factors, along with its ability to respond to the most pressing needs of the\npopulation in a timely manner, justify the support the World Bank in the process of emergency drought\nresponse and recovery in Somalia.\n\n\nPage 100 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.9179278016090393,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.8704794049263,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "drought\nresponse and recovery",
+ "confidence": 0.621995210647583,
+ "start": 300,
+ "end": 304
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": null,
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9571549892425537,
+ "start": 305,
+ "end": 306
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 104
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 4: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS**\n\n\n**COUNTRY: Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n\n1. **The context of the current drought and resulting humanitarian emergency compounds**\n**existing development deficits and humanitarian challenges.** Decades of protracted conflict, political\ninstability, persistent drought and famine have disrupted delivery of desperately needed services,\ndevastated human capital and physical infrastructure, and contributed to systematic impoverishment\nand displacement of the population. Out of 170 countries, Somalia ranks among the bottom five least\ndeveloped countries as measured by UNDP’s Human Development Index. Disparities between rural and\nurban areas are pronounced. Only 7 percent of the rural population enjoys access to improved water\nsources, in contrast to 66 percent of people living in urban areas. Nationally, only 23 percent of the\npopulation has access to sanitation facilities, with access rates of 52 percent in urban centers and only 6\npercent in rural environments.\n\n2. **In the absence of stable institutions, the combination of hazards such drought, flood, and**\n**environmental degradation compounded by conflict have resulted in full-scale humanitarian crises.**\nThe recurrent disasters affect the most vulnerable communities, including the 1.1 million internally\ndisplaced persons (IDPs). Although food security has improved in recent years, current conditions have\nrendered over the half the country (6.7 million) food insecure. Depletion of water resources and poor\nsanitation facilities have contributed to an increase in case of AWD/cholera in 13 out of 18 regions. [40] A\nrise in measles has also been reported, with 3,800 suspected cases in the Banadir region accounting for\nalmost 29 percent of all suspected cases, particularly in malnourished children and people with reduced\nimmunity measles. These predisposing factors can cause serious complications including blindness,\nsevere diarrhea, ear infection, and pneumonia. Pregnant women who become infected are also at risk of\nsevere complications. Their pregnancies may end in miscarriage or preterm delivery.\n\n3. **Drought conditions present significant risks to livelihood systems in Somalia.** Pastoralism,\nagro-pastoralism and trading are the primary economic activities in Somalia. They are highly\ncomplementary and interdependent, and constitute the basis of the present economy. Livestock\nproduction is the most common source of livelihoods; 4.2 million people are pastoralists or agropastoralists, occupying 26 out of 33 defined livelihoods zones in the country. [41] Livestock sales account\nfor 50-60 percent of the income generated in the northeast under normal circumstances, and the sale of\nlivestock by-products account or 15-25 percent. Supplementary income for the poor comes through\nemployment, which accounts for 20-30 percent of their earnings. The region’s pastoralists obtain 60-80\npercent of their food from market purchases, and the remaining 20-40 percent from their own\nproduction (milk, ghee and meat). Drought conditions have already interfered with agricultural\nproduction activities and damaged livestock herds, disrupting critical livelihoods systems. [42]\n\n\n40 UN OCHA. 2017. Somalia: Drought Response, Situation Report No. 4\n41 FSNAU, 2012. _Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Post_ Gu _Season 2012.”_ Technical Series, Report No VI. 48.\nFSNAU, Nairobi. _[http://www.fsnau.org/downloads/FSNAU-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report.pdf](http://www.fsnau.org/downloads/FSNAU-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report.pdf)_\n42 UN OCHA. 2017. Somalia: Drought Response, Situation Report No. 4\n\n\nPage 101 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.7780286073684692,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "UNDP",
+ "confidence": 0.9675063490867615,
+ "start": 128,
+ "end": 129
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.9847865700721741,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "livelihood systems",
+ "confidence": 0.5751699209213257,
+ "start": 410,
+ "end": 412
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.6934124827384949,
+ "start": 413,
+ "end": 414
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 105
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n4. **Somali society is strongly patriarchal, with clearly delineated divisions of labor between men,**\n**women, boys and girls particularly in pastoralist communities.** During non-crisis periods, men and\nwomen in pastoral communities maintain a well-defined, synergistic partnership in livestock and crop\nproduction activities, with both men and women playing a significant, specialized role in the overall\nmaintenance of the pastoral system. While male members of the household are responsible for most\nactivities related to camel rearing and raising, for example, women are responsible for the sale and\nprocessing of camel by-products such as milk and ghee. Although women and children are tasked with\nraising and tending to sheep and goats (shoats), men are jointly responsible for shoat trade and\nexport. [43] Major trade for export is typically conducted by men. [44] Aside from export, animals are also\nmarketed domestically providing a source of employment for the local population, particularly for\nwomen who are often involved in domestic meat selling and in the production of other animal byproducts, including milk, soaps and jewelry from bones. [45]\n\n\n5. **Differentiated social roles and responsibilities between men and women across livelihood**\n**systems have implications on the available mechanisms to cope and respond to external shocks such**\n**as drought.** In the face of crisis, such as insecurity, drought or famine, men and women adopt different\ncoping strategies to increase household resilience. Family splitting, for example, constitutes an\nimportant survival mechanism as families break up to spread economic risks and increase access to\nlivelihood opportunities. [46 ] Men and older boys, for example, may take herds and migrate longer\ndistances in search of water, resources, or possible alternative livelihoods, while women remain with\nsmall children, the elderly and weaker animals. [47] Women might also take children and move to an IDP\ncamp in search of greater access to resources and security, although these migrations often expose\nwomen to greater security threats. Male household members may migrate to urban centers seeking\neconomic opportunities. Alternatively, women sometimes travel to towns to engage in petty trade and\nengage in the informal economy.\n\n6. **While family splitting may be a common coping strategy, prolonged exposure to conflict and**\n**recurring droughts has extended separation beyond traditional limits and necessitated women to**\n**adopt new, more expansive roles as income earners, particularly if separation becomes permanent.**\nThe extended absence of males, whether due to conflict or irregular migration, has resulted in a\nsignificant number of female-headed households, as well as households in which women become the\nprimary or contributing breadwinners for the family. There are positive and negative implications\nassociated with this shift. On the one hand, Somali women are becoming increasingly active in nontraditional economic activities such as livestock trading and marketing activities in multiple sectors. [48] An\n\n\n43 FSNAU. 2012. “Gender in Emergency Food Security, Livelihoods and Nutrition in Somalia: A compendium of what\nwe know; and recommendations on what we need to know for enhanced Gender Analysis.” Baseline report.\nFSNAU, Nairobi\n44 FSNAU. 2012\n45 World Bank, 2017\n46 Gardner, Judith. 2004. “Changing Roles and Responsibilities in the Family.” In _Somalia – The Untold Story: The_\n_War through the Eyes of Somali Women_, ed. Judith Gardner and Judy El Bushra, 99-106. London: CIIR and Pluto\nPress\n47 Ibrahim, Rhoda M. 2004. “Women’s Role in the Pastoral Economy.” In _Somalia – The Untold Story: The War_\n_through the Eyes of Somali Women_, ed. Judith Gardner and Judy El Bushra, 24-50. London: CIIR and Pluto Press\n48 Ibrahim 2004\n\n\nPage 102 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 106
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nassessment of livelihoods activities in Baidoa revealed that women occupy 20 percent of the unskilled\nlabor within the construction sector and 70 percent of petty trade. [49]\n\n\n7. **Available economic opportunities, however, are still quite limited for both men and women**\n**and female-headed households remain among the most vulnerable populations.** Unemployment rates\nare generally high, reaching 67 percent for men and women between 14 and 29, and 54 percent for\nthose between 15 and 64. [50 ] Unemployment rates remain particularly high for women, and especially\nfemale IDPs who often remain reliant on charity through social protection mechanisms and\ncontributions from the diaspora in the form of remittances. Also, while women have been moving into\neconomic terrain previously dominated by men, there has been little to no shift in men’s participation in\ndomestic tasks. Women are therefore bearing the double domestic burden of earning an income and\ntaking care of the home. The consequences of this burden often fall to girls in the family, who are\nexpected to contribute to the maintenance of the home, often at the expense of education and skills\ndevelopment. [51]\n\n\n8. **Extended displacement and irregular mobility presents potential risks to youth populations,**\n**with potential to exacerbate in particular existing conditions of youth unemployment.** Unemployment\nand the absence of sustainable livelihoods opportunities present a significant challenge in Somalia,\nparticularly when 70 percent of the population falls under the age of 30. Expanding youth populations,\nwith little education and training, are exerting extreme pressure on already saturated labor markets, as\nthey confront limited opportunities for earning an income. Unskilled, uneducated youth populations,\nsuch as those likely to undertake irregular migration in response to climate-related or other shocks, are\nmost vulnerable to economic shocks and least likely to find work in the formal economy. Further, the\nabsence of educational and job opportunities may heighten inequalities and impede poverty alleviation\nefforts. Frustrated ambitions and feelings of deprivation may further contribute to a breakdown in\ncommunity participation and social cohesion and may leave youth populations vulnerable to\nmobilization into criminal activities, including participation in gangs, drugs and other illicit networks.\nEvidence has indicated, for example, that idle, uneducated and/or unemployed youth populations are\nready targets for radicalization and recruitment into militant groups such as Al-Shabaab.\n\n_**Protection Challenges – Gender-Based Violence and Displacement**_\n\n\n9. **There is also a strong link between coping and resilience strategies and exposure to severe**\n**protection challenges.** During the 2011 drought, the Global Protection Cluster identified a range of\ncritical protection risks including forced displacement, family separation, sexual violence and abuse,\nearly marriage of girls, and lack of access to basic services. Key challenges disproportionately affected\nthe weakest and most vulnerable groups, in particular displaced populations. Reports indicated a\npronounced rise in rape and sexual violence against displaced women who were rendered more\nvulnerable by the disintegration of traditional clan and other protection structures. [52]\n\n\n49 FSNAU 2012b\n50 UNDP 2012\n51 Interagency Working Group on Disaster Preparedness for East and Central Africa\n52 Brookings Institution. 2016,\nhttps://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/03_nd_review_chapter3.pdf\n\n\nPage 103 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 107
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n10. **Gender-based violence (GBV) constitutes another significant protection challenge that, while**\n**prevalent throughout Somalia, is likely to be exacerbated by the drought-related crisis.** Types of\nviolence experience in Somalia include physical assault, rape, sexual assault, forced marriage, denial of\nresources, and psychological/emotional abuse. Drivers of GBV include pervasive social norms that\nperpetuate gender inequalities and power imbalances between men and women in both the public and\nprivate sphere. These dynamics are exacerbated by pervasive insecurity, poverty and displacement—\nlinked both to conflict and climate-related disasters—and deteriorating social and customary structures.\nThese risks increase in the context of shocks in part as women and girls travel longer distances without\nprotection to find water, food, livelihoods and other resources, particularly for IDPs traveling outside\nformal or informal settlement areas. Women and girls traveling _en route_ to or from IDP settlements,\noften in search of economic and other support services, also confront serious risk of violence.\n\n\n11. **Increases in violence are further attributed, among other factors, to increased trauma and**\n**stress in the aftermath of disasters or climate-related events, as well as losses in economic**\n**opportunities and livelihoods particularly for men both in the short- and longer-term.** [53] Global\nevidence indicates that as women increasingly contribute to household stability and resilience, backlash\nfrom male partners or relatives who perceive their own disempowerment often increases, manifesting\nin negative coping behaviors including aggression, depression, addiction and use of violence in the\nhome.\n\n\n12. **Under current drought conditions in Somalia, there are reports of increases in domestic**\n**violence in the Puntland region due to unmet needs and general hardships.** UN OCHA has also\nreported a rise in early and forced marriage as families seek stability and income by marrying daughters\nto those with access to resources. These reports align with global evidence that highlights the extent to\nwhich external shocks like natural disasters exacerbate gender inequalities and exposure to violence.\nIncreases in violence are attributed, among other factors, to increased trauma and stress in the\naftermath of disaster, as well as losses in economic opportunities and livelihoods particularly for men\nboth in the short- and longer-term. [54]\n\n\n13. **Current drought conditions are contributing to already pronounced rates of acute and**\n**protracted displacement. More than 278,000 people have been displaced in March alone within**\n**Somalia due to the drought, bringing the total number to approximately 585,630 since December**\n**2016.** [55] In the first three weeks of 2017 alone, more than 33,000 Somalis were displaced due to drought\nalone. [56] In Borama, Somaliland, approximately 8,000 households (40,000 individuals) were reported as\nbeing newly displaced in January 2017. [57] Puntland and Somaliland have experienced huge losses of\nlivestock, resulting in pastoral dropouts and displacement. The little rain in December 2016 in some\nareas of Puntland resulted in a huge migration of pastoralists to benefit from the rains.\n\n\n53 World Bank. 2010. “The Gender Dimensions of Poverty and Climate Change Adaptation.” From _Social Dimensions_\n_of Climate Change_, edited by Robin Mearns and Andrew Norton\n54 World Bank. 2010. “The Gender Dimensions of Poverty and Climate Change Adaptation.” From _Social Dimensions_\n_of Climate Change_, edited by Robin Mearns and Andrew Norton\n55 UNHCR, UN Habitat, IOM, JIRA and Local Ministries of Interior, IOM and The World Bank, 2017\n56 Somalia: Operational Plan for famine prevention, Jan-Jun 2017, OCHA\n57 National Environment Research and Disaster-preparedness, NERAD, 2017\n\n\nPage 104 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 108
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n14. **The majority of drought-related displacement takes place from rural to urban areas.** In Baidoa,\nfor example, more than 7,000 people arrived in the first three weeks of January in search of water and\nfood, having traveled by foot, in donkey carts and trucks. Most of the families have joined existing\nsettlements for internally displaced in Baidoa. Most of the newly displaced (80 per cent) are from\nvillages in the Bay region. It is foreseen that as the situation continues to deteriorate, increasing\nnumbers of people from rural areas will move to urban centers and join settlements for internally\ndisplaced. In some cases, families split up and let children and women move to towns, while men stay\nbehind with the remaining animals. In other cases, preemptive movement is done by the strongest\nfamily members, leaving behind young children, women and the elderly.\n\n\n15. **While demographic profile information is still needed, it is likely these drought-related**\n**internal displacements may be from minority clans, who have lost assets including their homes,**\n**livestock, and livelihoods.** They are further rendered vulnerable to “gatekeepers” of land and\ninfrastructure who extract a percentage of assistance resources for themselves, because they are\nperceived as outsiders due to their ethnic or tribal status, and are therefore unable to become\n“permanent residents” but may have “temporary sanctuary” according to local authorities. Camps are\nheavily congested and have also proportionally received the largest number of new arrivals. [58]\n\n\n16. **Displaced women and girls are among the most vulnerable populations—to extreme poverty,**\n**marginalization, conflict and climate-related shocks such as drought.** Displaced women face multiple\nconstraints including lack of adequate shelter, limited economic opportunities and lack of control over\ncritical resources, including access to land, finance and other inputs. Female IDPs also face unique risks\nof GBV and sexual exploitation due to limited security in the IDP settlements, poor living conditions and\nlimited clan protection. The attendant separation of many women and girls from community and familial\nsupport structures, as well as from traditional livelihoods activities, also contributes to an increased\nreliance particularly of women on marginal, inconsistent and hazardous livelihood strategies, which\noften increases exposure to violence.\n\n\n17. **IDPs face severe nutritional and food security challenges.** As part of “Gu” 2016 assessment\nplan, FSNAU and partners working in Somalia conducted integrated Nutrition and Food security\nassessments among the 12 IDP settlements across Somalia from 28 May- 3 June 2016. The objective of\nthe assessments was to monitor the nutrition situation of these vulnerable IDP population groups as\npart of FSNAU’s biannual surveillance activities. The findings indicated that the nutrition situation in the\nNortheast, IDPs residing in Bossaso, Garowe and Galkayo, were considered alarming with critical levels\nof malnutrition. The “Gu” 2016 findings also show high morbidity rates which indicated a direct effect on\nthe nutrition status of the children. Acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months is a direct outcome\nindicator of recent changes in nutritional status and sickness.\n\n\n18. **Critical levels of Global Acute Malnutrition (GAM rate ≥15 percent) were observed among six**\n**IDP settlements of 12 surveyed during the “Gu” 2016 assessment.** These are the Dhobley, Baidoa and\nDolow IDP settlements in South-Central regions and Garowe, Bosasso and Galkayo in Northeast region.\nCritically, the nutrition situation in three of these IDP settlements (Dolow, Garowe and Galkayo) was\nsustained as Critical since 2014. Serious GAM levels (10-14.9 percent) were also recorded among IDP\n\n\n58 JRIA, 2016\n\n\nPage 105 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.5580676198005676,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "demographic profile information",
+ "confidence": 0.9960689544677734,
+ "start": 190,
+ "end": 193
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "vague",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Gu",
+ "confidence": 0.6243855953216553,
+ "start": 565,
+ "end": 566
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "FSNAU",
+ "confidence": 0.532374918460846,
+ "start": 527,
+ "end": 528
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.7466095685958862,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2016",
+ "confidence": 0.7614796161651611,
+ "start": 475,
+ "end": 476
+ },
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "IDP settlements",
+ "confidence": 0.8059861063957214,
+ "start": 495,
+ "end": 497
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 109
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nsettlements in Mogadishu, Kismayo and Dhusamareb in South Central region, Qardho (Northeast) and\nHargeisa (Northwest). Alert level of GAM (5-9.9 percent) was seen among Burao IDPs in the Northwest.\nIDP access to, and coverage of, vital public health programs such as routine immunization and Vitamin A\nsupplementation were the lowest in Mogadishu, Dhobley, Baidoa in the South Central Zones and\nDhusamareb in the North East Zone.\n\n\n19. **Drought is also pushing some to flee the country.** Since the start of the year, more than 3,770\nSomali new arrivals have been recorded at Melkadida in Ethiopia, and acute malnutrition has been\nreported in around 75 per cent of arriving child refugees. As the situation further deteriorates,\npopulation movements to Ethiopia are expected to continue, according to OCHA. It remains a possibility\nthat some of the most vulnerable in Jubbaland and beyond will choose to cross to Kenya, however no\nsubstantial movement into Kenya has been reported so far. [59]\n\n_**Social Cohesion and Conflict Challenges**_\n\n\n20. **Social fragmentation and factors of exclusion may impede efforts for immediate drought**\n**response and recovery.** The extended absence of effective governance in Somalia and over two decades\nof conflict has had an enormous social impact upon the population. Social fragmentation is a prevalent\nfeature of Somali society and in the absence of trusted public institutions, communities rely far more\nupon informal networks and traditional structures. Clan affiliations are an important characteristic of\nlocal culture and play a critical role in delineating men’s and women’s roles in Somali society. Customary\ntraditions and conventions help to define rights and obligations between kin, clans and sub-clans. While\nthe interaction of customary (xeer) with Islamic and statutory systems provide the legal and justice\nframeworks governing Somali society. Clan councils and clan elders employing customary law have been\ninstrumental in containing violence, resolving disputes and dispensing traditional justice at the\ncommunity level. [60]\n\n21. **Aspects of these customary systems, however, have also contributed to conflict across**\n**communities and have contributed to challenges around active participation, recognition, and redress**\n**for many marginalized groups including women, youth, and certain minority sub-clans.** These groups\nare often discriminated against, stigmatized, and excluded from broader decision making structures. It is\ntherefore critical that where relevant and feasible, project activities ensure inclusion and active\nparticipation of community groups traditionally excluded or marginalized from consultation and\ndecision-making processes particularly at the community level.\n\n\n_**Supported Agency Response to Social Considerations**_\n\n\n22. **FAO has recognized the differentiated roles, needs and constraints between men and women**\n**and explicitly raises attention to gender dimensions of food and nutrition security and livelihoods as**\n**one within its Country Programming Framework for 2014-2016.** In particular, the document highlights\na commitment to ensuring the strategic engagement aims to improve productivity of men and women,\ngirls and boys and to ensure practical and strategic needs of men and women are adequately met.\n\n59 _Somalia: Operational Plan for Famine Prevention_, Jan-Jun 2017, OCHA, February, 2017,\n[http://reliefweb.int/report/somalia/somalia-operational-plan-famine-prevention-jan-jun-2017](http://reliefweb.int/report/somalia/somalia-operational-plan-famine-prevention-jan-jun-2017)\n60 Shuke, 2010\n\n\nPage 106 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project",
+ "confidence": 0.8230414390563965,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 14
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": {
+ "text": "Burao IDPs",
+ "confidence": 0.679908812046051,
+ "start": 52,
+ "end": 54
+ },
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Country Programming Framework",
+ "confidence": 0.6327354311943054,
+ "start": 561,
+ "end": 564
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.8055495619773865,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "2014-2016",
+ "confidence": 0.9208230972290039,
+ "start": 565,
+ "end": 566
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Operational Plan for Famine Prevention_",
+ "confidence": 0.7498853802680969,
+ "start": 612,
+ "end": 617
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": {
+ "text": "Shuke",
+ "confidence": 0.7720543146133423,
+ "start": 630,
+ "end": 631
+ },
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": {
+ "text": "2017",
+ "confidence": 0.9311560392379761,
+ "start": 619,
+ "end": 620
+ },
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 110
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nThrough the partnership between the World Bank and FAO, the activities articulated under this project\nwill further seek to strengthen the gendered lens through which interventions are delivered, as well as\nthe application of a differentiated approach that reflects the varied vulnerabilities of displacementaffected groups.\n\n\n23. **ICRC recognizes and considers the differentiated vulnerabilities and needs of women, children**\n**and those affected by displacement – including hosting communities, IDPs, refugees and returnees.** [61]\nIn particular, the organization’s guiding documents for planning and implementation of humanitarian\nprograms notes the while fleeing, women may be particularly exposed to violence. This is often\ncompounded by the loss of, and separation from, family members. In this respect, they note that when\noperating in periods of large movements of populations, they will make all possible coordinated efforts\nto help families avoid separation. With regard to displaced people and displaced women in particular,\nthe ICRC recognizes family separation increases the vulnerability of displaced women to economic\nhardship or threats to their physical integrity. As such, when assessing the basic needs of displaced\npersons, unaccompanied women, including elderly women and women alone with children, will be\nidentified and registered for the purpose of individual follow up and targeting with appropriate\nprogramming.\n\n\n61 Addressing the Needs of Women Affected by Armed Conflict: An ICRC Guidance Document, ICRC, 2004\n[https://shop.icrc.org/repondre-aux-besoins-des-femmes-affectees-par-les-conflits-armes-un-guide-pratique-du-](https://shop.icrc.org/repondre-aux-besoins-des-femmes-affectees-par-les-conflits-armes-un-guide-pratique-du-cicr-494.html)\n[cicr-494.html](https://shop.icrc.org/repondre-aux-besoins-des-femmes-affectees-par-les-conflits-armes-un-guide-pratique-du-cicr-494.html)\n\n\nPage 107 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 111
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 5: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT PLAN**\n\n\n**COUNTRY: Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n\n**Strategy and Approach for Implementation Support**\n\n\n1. **The proposed project is an emergency operation processed under OP 10.00 paragraph 12, and**\n**uses a UN agency (FAO) and a humanitarian agency (ICRC) as recipients of IDA funds.** The FAO\ncomponent of the Project will be subject to FAO’s fiduciary policies and procedures in view of the\napplication of the FMFA, and the APA. The ICRC component will be subject to WB fiduciary policies, and\nthe procurement will follow APA procedures that will allow ICRC to use their procurement procedures.\nThe World Bank safeguard policies and procedures will apply. With regard to fraud and corruption, the\nBoard decision is sought for a waiver of paragraph 20 of BP 10.00 on application of the World Bank’s\nAnti-Corruption Guidelines to the UN agencies, (see section G under Implementation Arrangements).\nThe WB will support ICRC’s and FAO’s implementation efforts and help manage key risks to attain the\nPDO.\n\n2. **The strategy for the WB’s implementation support for the proposed project has been**\n**developed based on the nature of the project and its risk profile.** The Systematic Operations Risk\nRating Tool (SORT) rates the overall implementation risk as **substantial**, with the following elements of\nthe risk considered to be either substantial or high: a) Political and Governance; b) Institutional Capacity\nfor Implementation and Sustainability, and; c) Fiduciary.\n\n**Implementation Support Plan and Resource Requirements**\n\n3. **ICRC Somalia delegate are responsible for the implementation of the project activities in close**\n**coordination with the ICRC’s Headquarters which provides oversight and guidance.** ICRC will provide\nnarrative progress reports as well as financial reports and financial statements to the World Bank every\nthree months. The narrative report will include: a summary of the progress and the context within which\nthe project is implemented; the activities carried out during the reporting period; any challenges\nencountered and measures taken; changes introduced in implementation, including changes in the\nbudget; achievements and results of the project with reference to identified indicators; and the work\nplan for the following period.\n\n4. **FAO Somalia (FAOSO) are responsible for the implementation of the project activities.**\nInformation from various sources will be used to assess and monitor the progress of the Project\nthroughout its implementation. The World Bank will review the findings and results of third-party\nassessments and environmental and social audits that will be undertaken during the course of project\nimplementation. The project, however, will support the independent TPTR, and the organizations’\nmonitoring and evaluation activities of the project. The independent TPTR agency will provide World\nBank finding reports include grievances received every three months. The progress report as well as\nfinancial reports and financial statements will be provided to the World Bank every three months by\nFAO. The progress report will include: a summary of the progress and the context within which the\nproject is implemented; the activities carried out during the reporting period; any challenges\n\n\nPage 108 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 112
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\nencountered and measures taken; changes introduced in implementation, including changes in the\nbudget; achievements and results of the project with reference to identified indicators; and the work\nplan for the following period.\n\n**World Bank Supervision**\n\n5. **The World Bank will conduct implementation support missions at least biannually to:** (a)\nreview implementation progress and achievement of PDO and intermediate indicators; (b) provide\nsupport for any implementation issues that may arise; (c) provide technical support related to project\nimplementation, achievement of results, and capacity building; and (d) discuss relevant risks and\nmitigation measures.\n\n6. **The World Bank team comprises specialists in the areas of health, agriculture, water resource**\n**and sanitization, operations, financial management, procurement, social and environment safeguards,**\n**and administration.** World Bank operational and fiduciary staff are based in the World Bank’s Country\nOffice in Nairobi which will facilitate implementation support and ad hoc problem solving as needed.\nWith regard to specific technical support, experts may be recruited as deemed necessary during project\nimplementation.\n\n\n7. **The overall residual FM risk for this operation is assessed high, requiring World Bank**\n**implementation support supervision once every 6 months.** This assumes that the Project oversight,\nimplementation and coordination arrangements shall be centralized within FAO and ICRC. The\nimplementation support supervision will be consistent with a risk-based approach and will involve a\ncollaborative approach through the project implementation arrangements. Additional supervision\nactivities will include desk review of quarterly IFRs and internal audit reports, audited Financial\nStatements and Management Letters as well as timely follow up of issues arising, and updating the\nfinancial management rating in the Implementation Status report (ISR) and the Portfolio and World Bank\nRisk Management (PRIMA) System.\n\n8. **The following Implementation Support Plan (ISP) reflects the preliminary estimates of the skill**\n**requirements, timing, and resource requirements over the life of the Project.** Keeping in mind the need\nto maintain flexibility over Project activities from year to year, the plan will be reviewed annually to\nensure that it continues to meet the implementation support needs of the Project.\n\n_Table 18: Implementation Support Plan_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Time|Focus|Skills Needed|Resource Estimate
(labor + mission)|Partner Role|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|First 6 months| Project launch
Initialization of Project
components
FM systems functioning
effectively
Procurement practice
Monitor implementation| Team lead
FM, Procurement
Safeguards Specialist
DRM Specialist
Agriculture,
Livestock, Health,
Water Resources,| US$35,000
US$10,000
US$20,000
US$15,000
US$45,000| Third-Party
Technical Review is
hired for FAO
1st – 2nd quarter
progress report
provided before
the mission|\n\n\nPage 109 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "identified indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.5728065967559814,
+ "start": 42,
+ "end": 44
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": {
+ "text": "achievements and results of the project",
+ "confidence": 0.8043288588523865,
+ "start": 33,
+ "end": 39
+ },
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": {
+ "text": "Somalia",
+ "confidence": 0.7905543446540833,
+ "start": 7,
+ "end": 8
+ },
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "intermediate indicators",
+ "confidence": 0.6074279546737671,
+ "start": 91,
+ "end": 93
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "quarterly IFRs",
+ "confidence": 0.731584906578064,
+ "start": 317,
+ "end": 319
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": {
+ "text": "report",
+ "confidence": 0.6605536937713623,
+ "start": 350,
+ "end": 351
+ },
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "internal audit reports",
+ "confidence": 0.8317883610725403,
+ "start": 320,
+ "end": 323
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "audited Financial\nStatements",
+ "confidence": 0.7486742734909058,
+ "start": 324,
+ "end": 327
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Management Letters",
+ "confidence": 0.7218897938728333,
+ "start": 328,
+ "end": 330
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "supporting"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "Resource Estimate",
+ "confidence": 0.6229378581047058,
+ "start": 457,
+ "end": 459
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "non-dataset",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": null,
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ },
+ {
+ "dataset_name": {
+ "text": "progress report",
+ "confidence": 0.9737629890441895,
+ "start": 645,
+ "end": 647
+ },
+ "dataset_tag": "descriptive",
+ "description": null,
+ "data_type": null,
+ "acronym": null,
+ "author": null,
+ "producer": null,
+ "geography": null,
+ "publication_year": null,
+ "reference_year": {
+ "text": "1st – 2nd quarter",
+ "confidence": 0.7061357498168945,
+ "start": 638,
+ "end": 642
+ },
+ "reference_population": null,
+ "is_used": "False",
+ "usage_context": "background"
+ }
+ ],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 113
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n\n|Col1|of Project activities|Irrigation and WASH
Specialist/s|Col4|Col5|\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n|6 – 12 months| Monitor implementation
of Project activities
FM, Procurement,
Safeguards
| Team lead
FM, Procurement
Safeguards Specialist
DRM Specialist
Agriculture,
Livestock, Health,
Water Resources,
Irrigation and WASH
Specialist/s
| US$52,000
US$10,000
US$28,000
US$24,000
US$58,000| Prepare
comprehensive
Project progress
and results
monitoring reports
in advance of each
mission
Update
implementation
and procurement
plans routinely
Organize field visits
Project Closing|\n\n\n_Table 19: Skills Mix Required_\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n|Skills Needed|Number of Staff Weeks|Number of Trips|Comments|\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Team lead
FM, Procurement
Safeguards Specialist
DRM Specialist
Agriculture, Livestock,
Health, Water
Resources, Irrigation
and WASH Specialist/s
|| Routine support
August 2017
Jan 2018
May 2018
| Project will likely become
effective by June 2017 with the
first mission occurring by the
start of July 2017
Ensure safeguard
arrangements are built into
implementation plans
Review implementation,
commitment and
disbursement status
Ensure safeguards
arrangements are built into
implementation plans
Support to monitor progress of
activities, in-depth technical
review of implementation;
make adjustments to
implementation plan if needed
Support to monitor progress of
activities, in-depth technical
review of implementation|\n\n\nPage 110 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 114
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "input_text": "**The World Bank**\nSomalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project (P163830)\n\n\n**ANNEX 6: MAP OF SOMALIA**\n\n\n**COUNTRY : Somalia**\n**Somalia Emergency Drought Response and Recovery Project**\n\n\nCleared by the World Bank’s General Services Department (April 24, 2017).\n\n\n\nPage 111 of 111\n\n\n",
+ "datasets": [],
+ "document": {
+ "source": "http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/683581495802767249/pdf/Project-Appraisal-Document-PAD-P163830-2017-05-22-CLEAN-05232017.pdf",
+ "pages": [
+ 115
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+]
\ No newline at end of file