| ****************** |
| Release Procedures |
| ****************** |
|
|
| The current release procedure for Astropy involves a combination of an |
| automated release script and some manual steps. Future versions will automate |
| more of the process, if not all. |
|
|
| There are several different procedures below, depending on the situation: |
|
|
| * :ref:`release-procedure` |
| - :ref:`release-procedure-beta-rc` |
| * :ref:`release-procedure-new-major` |
| * :ref:`release-procedure-bug-fix` |
| - :ref:`release-procedure-bug-fix-backport` |
| - :ref:`release-procedure-bug-fix-direct` |
| - :ref:`release-procedure-bug-fix-release` |
| * :ref:`helpers-release-info` |
|
|
| For a signed release, see :ref:`key-signing-info` for relevant setup |
| instructions. |
|
|
|
|
| .. _release-procedure: |
|
|
| Standard Release Procedure |
| ========================== |
|
|
| This is the standard release procedure for releasing Astropy (or affiliated |
| packages that use the full bugfix/maintenance branch approach.) |
|
|
| |
| section with the stats on the number of issues, PRs, and contributors. For |
| the first two, the `astropy-procedures repository`_ script ``gh_issuereport.py`` |
| can provide the numbers since the last major release. For the final one, you |
| will likely need to update the Astropy ``.mailmap`` file, as there are often |
| contributors who are not careful about using the same e-mail address for |
| every commit. The easiest way to do this is to run the command |
| ``git shortlog -n -s -e`` to see the list of all contributors and their email |
| addresses. Look for any misnamed entries or duplicates, and add them to the |
| ``.mailmap`` file (matched to the appropriate canonical name/email address.) |
| Once you have finished this, you can count the number of lines in |
| ``git shortlog -s`` to get the final contributor count. |
|
|
| |
| contributors. This can come from the above step, or the ``author_lists.py`` |
| script in the `astropy-procedures repository`_ mostly automates this. (This |
| step is only required on major releases, but can be done for bugfix releases |
| as time allows.) |
|
|
| |
| For more on setting up virtual environments, see :ref:`virtual_envs`, but |
| for the sake of example we will assume you're using `Anaconda`_. This is not |
| necessary if you know your normal python environment has what you need, but |
| you might want to do something like this for safety's sake:: |
|
|
| $ conda create -n astropy_release_build_v<version> astropy |
| $ source activate astropy_release_build_v<version> |
| $ conda uninstall astropy |
| $ pip install -e .[docs,test] |
| $ pip uninstall astropy |
|
|
| |
| astropy-helpers. This is not always necessary, as there are not always any |
| significant changes in the helpers. See :ref:`helpers-release-info` for more |
| on this. |
|
|
| |
| for the `astropy core repository`_ branch you're going to release. You may |
| also want to locally run the tests (with remote data on to ensure all the |
| tests actually run), and make sure the description in ``setup.cfg`` is ReST |
| compliant:: |
| |
| $ python setup.py test --remote-data=any |
| $ TEST_READ_HUGE_FILE=1 pytest -sv astropy/io/ascii/tests/test_c_reader.py -k big_table |
| $ python setup.py check --restructuredtext |
| |
| #. Ensure you have a GPG key pair available for when git needs to sign the |
| tag you create for the release. See :ref:`key-signing-info` for more on |
| this. |
| |
| #. Obtain a *clean* version of the `astropy core repository`_. That is, one |
| where you don't have any intermediate build files. Either use a fresh |
| ``git clone`` or do ``git clean -dfx``. If you choose to clean the working tree, |
| don't forget to clean the ``astropy_helpers`` submodule, too. |
| |
| #. Be sure you're on the branch appropriate for the version you're about to |
| release. For example, if releasing version 1.2.2 make sure to:: |
| |
| $ git checkout v1.2.x |
| |
| #. Edit the ``CHANGES.rst`` file by changing the date for the version you are |
| about to release from "unreleased" to today's date. Also be sure to remove |
| any sections of the changelog for that version that have no entries. Then |
| add and commit those changes with:: |
|
|
| <use your favorite editor on CHANGES.rst> |
| $ git add CHANGES.rst |
| $ git commit -m "Finalizing changelog for v<version>" |
|
|
| |
| ``version`` string, then add and commit that change as the final step prior |
| to release:: |
|
|
| <use your favorite editor on setup.cfg> |
| $ git add setup.cfg |
| $ git commit -m "Preparing release v<version>" |
|
|
| |
| ``-s`` option:: |
|
|
| $ git tag -s v<version> -m "Tagging v<version>" |
|
|
| |
| ``git checkout v<version>``. For example:: |
|
|
| $ git checkout v1.2.2 |
|
|
| Don't forget to remove any non-committed files both from the main working tree |
| and ``astropy_helpers`` submodules with:: |
| |
| $ git clean -dfx |
| $ cd astropy_helpers; git clean -dfx; cd .. |
| |
| #. Make sure the source distribution doesn't inherit limited permissions |
| following your default umask:: |
|
|
| $ umask 0022 |
| $ chmod -R a+Xr . |
|
|
| |
|
|
| $ python setup.py build sdist |
|
|
| .. note:: |
|
|
| In the future, the ``build`` command may run automatically as a |
| prerequisite for ``sdist``. But for now, make sure to run it |
| whenever running ``sdist`` to ensure that all Cython sources and |
| other generated files are built. |
|
|
| |
| This is not strictly necessary because you ran the tests above, but |
| it can sometimes be useful to catch subtle bugs that might come from you |
| using a customized developer environment. For more on setting up virtual |
| environments, see :ref:`virtual_envs`, but for the sake of example we will |
| assume you're using `Anaconda`_. Do:: |
| |
| $ conda create -n astropy_release_test_v<version> numpy |
| $ source activate astropy_release_test_v<version> |
| $ pip install dist/astropy-<version>.tar.gz |
| $ python -c 'import astropy; astropy.test(remote_data=True)' |
| $ source deactivate |
| |
| #. Build and test the Astropy wheels. See the `wheel builder README |
| <https://github.com/MacPython/astropy-wheels>`_ for instructions. In |
| summary, clone the wheel-building repo, edit the ``.travis.yml`` and |
| ``appveyor.yml`` text files with the branch or commit for the release, |
| commit and then push back up to github. This will trigger a wheel build |
| and test on OSX, Linux and Windows. Check the build has passed on on the |
| Travis-CI interface at https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/astropy-wheels. |
| You'll need commit privileges to the ``astropy-wheels`` repo; ask Tom Kooij |
| or on the mailing list if you do not have them. |
|
|
| |
| First you'll need to back out the release procedure by dropping the commits |
| you made for release and removing the tag you created:: |
| |
| $ git reset --hard HEAD^^^^ # you could also use the SHA hash of the commit before your first changelog edit |
| $ git tag -d v<version> |
| |
| #. Once the tests are all passing, it's time to actually proceed with the |
| release! This has two steps: |
|
|
| * build and upload the Astropy wheels; |
| * make and upload the Astropy source release. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| instructions again. Edit the ``.travis.yml`` and ``appveyor.yml`` files |
| to give the release tag to build. Check the build has passed on on the |
| Travis-CI interface at https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/astropy-wheels. Now |
| follow the instructions in the page above to download the built wheels to a |
| local machine and upload to PyPI. If you use the ``wheel_download.py`` script, |
| make sure you loop through all the available OS to get all the wheels. |
|
|
| |
| For safety's sake, you may want to clean the repo yet again to make sure |
| you didn't leave anything from the previous step:: |
|
|
| $ git clean -dfx |
| $ cd astropy_helpers; git clean -dfx; cd .. |
|
|
| |
| the sdist command, which makes sure the source code is packaged up and ready |
| to be uploaded. You also need to GPG sign the release, before using twine to |
| upload it to PyPI. (You may need to install `twine`_ if you haven't used it yet):: |
| |
| $ python setup.py build sdist |
| $ gpg --detach-sign -a dist/astropy-<version>.tar.gz |
| $ twine upload dist/astropy-<version>* |
| |
| #. Go back to release branch (e.g., ``1.2.x``) and edit the ``version`` in |
| ``setup.cfg`` to be the next version number, but with |
| a ``.dev`` suffix at the end (e.g., ``1.2.3.dev``). Then add and commit:: |
| |
| $ git checkout v1.2.x |
| <use your favorite editor on setup.cfg> |
| $ git add setup.cfg |
| $ git commit -m "Back to development: v<next_version>.dev" |
| |
| #. Also update the ``CHANGES.rst`` file with a new section for the next version. |
| You will likely want to use the ``add_to_changelog.py`` script in the |
| `astropy-procedures repository`_ for this. Then add and commit:: |
| |
| <use your favorite editor on CHANGES.rst> |
| $ git add CHANGES.rst |
| $ git commit -m "Add v<next_version> to the changelog" |
| |
| #. Push up these changes and the tag to the `astropy core repository`_:: |
| |
| $ git push upstream v<version branch>.x |
| $ git push upstream v<version branch> |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| You may need to replace ``upstream`` here with ``astropy`` or |
| whatever remote name you use for the `astropy core repository`_. |
| Also, it might be tempting to use the ``--tags`` argument to ``git push``, |
| but this should *not* be done, as it might push up some unintended tags. |
| |
| #. If this is a release of the current release (i.e., not an LTS supported along |
| side a more recent version), update the "stable" branch to point to the new |
| release:: |
| |
| $ git checkout stable |
| $ git reset --hard v<version> |
| $ git push upstream stable --force |
| |
| #. Update Readthedocs so that it builds docs for the version you just released. |
| You'll find this in the "admin" tab, with checkboxes next to each github tag. |
| Also verify that the ``stable`` Readthedocs version builds correctly for |
| the new version (it should trigger automatically once you've done the |
| previous step). |
| |
| #. When releasing a patch release, also set the previous RTD version in the |
| release history to "protected". For example when releasing v1.1.2, set |
| v1.1.1 to "protected". This prevents the previous releases from |
| cluttering the list of versions that users see in the version dropdown |
| (the previous versions are still accessible by their URL though). |
| |
| #. Update the Astropy web site by editing the ``index.html`` page at |
| https://github.com/astropy/astropy.github.com by changing the "current |
| version" link and/or updating the list of older versions if this is an LTS |
| bugfix or a new major version. You may also need to update the contributor |
| list on the web site if you updated the ``docs/credits.rst`` at the outset. |
| |
| #. In the astropy *master* branch (not just the maintenance branch), be sure to |
| update the ``CHANGES.rst`` to reflect the date of the release you just |
| performed and to include the new section of the changelog. Often the easiest |
| way to do this is to use ``git cherry-pick`` the changelog commit just before |
| the release commit from above. If you aren't sure how to do this, you might |
| be better off copying-and-pasting the relevant parts of the maintenance |
| branch's ``CHANGES.rst`` into master. |
| |
| #. If there are any issues in the Github issue tracker that are labeled |
| ``affects-dev`` but are issues that apply to this release, update them to |
| ``affects-release``. Similarly, if any issues remain open for this release, |
| re-assign them to the next relevant milestone. |
| |
| #. Create a github milestone for the next bugfix version, move any remaining |
| issues from the version you just released, and close the milestone. When |
| releasing a major release, close the last milestone on the previous |
| maintenance branch, too. |
| |
| #. Notify the Conda Distribution Maintainer and the Continuous Integration |
| maintainer about the new release. Typically, you should wait to make sure |
| ``conda-forge`` and possible ``conda`` works before sending out the public |
| announcement (so that users that want to try out the new version can do |
| so on conda). |
| |
| #. Update the ``LATEST_ASTROPY_STABLE`` or ``ASTROPY_LTS_VERSION`` variables |
| in the ``ci-helpers`` repository once the ``conda`` packages became |
| available. |
| |
| #. Upload the release to Zenodo. This has to be done manually since the |
| Zenodo/GitHub integration relies on making releases on GitHub, which we |
| don't do. So for the Astropy core package, log in to |
| Zenodo using the Astropy team credentials, then go to the `existing |
| record <https://zenodo.org/record/1461593>`_. Click on **New version** - note |
| that it's important to do this rather than upload the release as a completely |
| new record. You should now see a pre-filled deposit form with the details from |
| the previous release. Start off by removing the existing file under the |
| **Files** section, then click on **Choose Files** and select the ``tar.gz`` |
| release file for the core package release you are uploading, and click |
| **Start upload**. Before you publish this, there are a few fields to update |
| in the form: the **Publication date** should be set to the date the tar |
| file was uploaded to PyPI, the **Title** should be updated to include the |
| new version number, and the **Version** should be updated to include the |
| version number (with no ``v`` prefix). Once you are happy with the changes, |
| click **Save**, then **Publish**. |
| |
| .. _release-procedure-beta-rc: |
| |
| Modifications for a beta/release candidate release |
| -------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| For major releases we do beta and/or release candidates to have a chance to |
| catch significant bugs before the true release. If the release you are |
| performing is this kind of pre-release, some of the above steps need to be |
| modified. |
| |
| The primary modifications to the release procedure are: |
| |
| * When entering the new version number, instead of just removing the |
| ``.dev``, enter "1.2b1" or "1.2rc1". It is critical that you follow this |
| numbering scheme (``x.yb#`` or ``x.y.zrc#``), as it will ensure the release |
| is ordered "before" the main release by various automated tools, and also |
| tells PyPI that this is a "pre-release". |
| * Do *not* do the step of adding ``.dev`` in the "back to development" stage. |
| If an RC goes well, there's no need for a "dev" stage, as the same version |
| will be released with only minor doc updates, and strings like "x.yrcz.dev" |
| confuse some version number parsing tools. |
| * Do not do step |
|
|
|
|
| .. _release-procedure-new-major: |
|
|
| Performing a Feature Freeze/Branching new Major Versions |
| ======================================================== |
|
|
| As outlined in |
| `APE2 <https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/master/APE2.rst>`_, astropy |
| releases occur at regular intervals, but feature freezes occur well before the |
| actual release. Feature freezes are also the time when the master branch's |
| development separates from the new major version's maintenance branch. This |
| allows new development for the next major version to continue while the |
| soon-to-be-released version can focus on bug fixes and documentation updates. |
|
|
| The procedure for this is straightforward: |
|
|
| |
|
|
| $ git fetch upstream |
| $ git checkout -B master upstream/master |
|
|
| |
| occur:: |
|
|
| $ git branch v<version>.x |
|
|
| |
| example, if you are about to issue a feature freeze for version ``1.2``, you |
| will want to set the new version to ``'1.3.dev'``. Then add and commit that:: |
|
|
| <use your favorite editor on setup.cfg> |
| $ git add setup.cfg |
| $ git commit -m "Next major version: <next_version>" |
|
|
| |
| next major version. You will likely want to use the ``add_to_changelog.py`` |
| script in the `astropy-procedures repository`_ for this. Then add and commit those |
| changes:: |
|
|
| <use your favorite editor on CHANGES.rst> |
| $ git add CHANGES.rst |
| $ git commit -m "Add <next_version> to changelog" |
|
|
| |
| next major version. E.g.:: |
|
|
| $ cp docs/whatsnew/<current_version>.rst docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst |
|
|
| You'll then need to edit ``docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst``, removing all |
| the content but leaving the basic structure. You may also need to |
| replace the "by the numbers" numbers with "xxx" as a reminder to update them |
| before the next release. Then add the new version to the top of |
| ``docs/whatsnew/index.rst``, update the reference in ``docs/index.rst`` to |
| point to the that version, and commit these changes :: |
| |
| $ git add docs/whatsnew/<next_version>.rst |
| $ git add docs/whatsnew/index.rst |
| $ git add docs/index.rst |
| $ git commit -m "Added <next_version> whats new section" |
| |
| #. Push all of these changes up to github:: |
| |
| $ git push upstream v<version>.x:v<version>.x |
| $ git push upstream master:master |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| You may need to replace ``upstream`` here with ``astropy`` or |
| whatever remote name you use for the `astropy core repository`_. |
| |
| #. On the github issue tracker, add a new milestone for the next major version. |
| |
| #. Repeat the above steps for the astropy-helpers, using the same version series. |
| |
| |
| .. _release-procedure-bug-fix: |
| |
| Maintaining Bug Fix Releases |
| ============================ |
| |
| Astropy releases, as recommended for most Python projects, follows a |
| <major>.<minor>.<micro> version scheme, where the "micro" version is also |
| known as a "bug fix" release. Bug fix releases should not change any user- |
| visible interfaces. They should only fix bugs on the previous major/minor |
| release and may also refactor internal APIs or include omissions from previous |
| releases--that is, features that were documented to exist but were accidentally |
| left out of the previous release. They may also include changes to docstrings |
| that enhance clarity but do not describe new features (e.g., more examples, |
| typo fixes, etc). |
| |
| Bug fix releases are typically managed by maintaining one or more bug fix |
| branches separate from the master branch (the release procedure below discusses |
| creating these branches). Typically, whenever an issue is fixed on the Astropy |
| master branch a decision must be made whether this is a fix that should be |
| included in the Astropy bug fix release. Usually the answer to this question |
| is "yes", though there are some issues that may not apply to the bug fix |
| branch. For example, it is not necessary to backport a fix to a new feature |
| that did not exist when the bug fix branch was first created. New features |
| are never merged into the bug fix branch--only bug fixes; hence the name. |
| |
| In rare cases a bug fix may be made directly into the bug fix branch without |
| going into the master branch first. This may occur if a fix is made to a |
| feature that has been removed or rewritten in the development version and no |
| longer has the issue being fixed. However, depending on how critical the bug |
| is it may be worth including in a bug fix release, as some users can be slow to |
| upgrade to new major/micro versions due to API changes. |
| |
| Issues are assigned to an Astropy release by way of the Milestone feature in |
| the GitHub issue tracker. At any given time there are at least two versions |
| under development: The next major/minor version, and the next bug fix release. |
| For example, at the time of writing there are two release milestones open: |
| v1.2.2 and v0.3.0. In this case, v1.2.2 is the next bug fix release and all |
| issues that should include fixes in that release should be assigned that |
| milestone. Any issues that implement new features would go into the v0.3.0 |
| milestone--this is any work that goes in the master branch that should not |
| be backported. For a more detailed set of guidelines on using milestones, see |
| :ref:`milestones-and-labels`. |
| |
| |
| .. _release-procedure-bug-fix-backport: |
| |
| Backporting fixes from master |
| ----------------------------- |
| |
| Most fixes are backported using the ``git cherry-pick`` command, which applies |
| the diff from a single commit like a patch. For the sake of example, say the |
| current bug fix branch is 'v1.2.x', and that a bug was fixed in master in a |
| commit ``abcd1234``. In order to backport the fix, checkout the v1.2.x |
| branch (it's also good to make sure it's in sync with the |
| `astropy core repository`_) and cherry-pick the appropriate commit:: |
| |
| $ git checkout v1.2.x |
| $ git pull upstream v1.2.x |
| $ git cherry-pick abcd1234 |
| |
| Sometimes a cherry-pick does not apply cleanly, since the bug fix branch |
| represents a different line of development. This can be resolved like any |
| other merge conflict: Edit the conflicted files by hand, and then run |
| ``git commit`` and accept the default commit message. If the fix being |
| cherry-picked has an associated changelog entry in a separate commit make |
| sure to backport that as well. |
| |
| What if the issue required more than one commit to fix? There are a few |
| possibilities for this. The easiest is if the fix came in the form of a |
| pull request that was merged into the master branch. Whenever GitHub merges |
| a pull request it generates a merge commit in the master branch. This merge |
| commit represents the *full* difference of all the commits in the pull request |
| combined. What this means is that it is only necessary to cherry-pick the |
| merge commit (this requires adding the ``-m 1`` option to the cherry-pick |
| command). For example, if ``5678abcd`` is a merge commit:: |
| |
| $ git checkout v1.2.x |
| $ git pull upstream v1.2.x |
| $ git cherry-pick -m 1 5678abcd |
| |
| In fact, because Astropy emphasizes a pull request-based workflow, this is the |
| *most* common scenario for backporting bug fixes, and the one requiring the |
| least thought. However, if you're not dealing with backporting a fix that was |
| not brought in as a pull request, read on. |
|
|
| .. seealso:: |
|
|
| :ref:`merge-commits-and-cherry-picks` for further explanation of the |
| cherry-pick command and how it works with merge commits. |
|
|
| If not cherry-picking a merge commit there are still other options for dealing |
| with multiple commits. The simplest, though potentially tedious, is to |
| run the cherry-pick command once for each commit in the correct order. |
| However, as of Git 1.7.2 it is possible to merge a range of commits like so:: |
|
|
| $ git cherry-pick 1234abcd..56789def |
|
|
| This works fine so long as the commits you want to pick are actually congruous |
| with each other. In most cases this will be the case, though some bug fixes |
| will involve followup commits that need to back backported as well. Most bug |
| fixes will have an issues associated with it in the issue tracker, so make sure |
| to reference all commits related to that issue in the commit message. That way |
| it's harder for commits that need to be backported from getting lost. |
| |
| |
| .. _release-procedure-bug-fix-direct: |
| |
| Making fixes directly to the bug fix branch |
| ------------------------------------------- |
| |
| As mentioned earlier in this section, in some cases a fix only applies to a bug |
| fix release, and is not applicable in the mainline development. In this case |
| there are two choices: |
| |
| 1. An Astropy developer with commit access to the `astropy core repository`_ may |
| check out the bug fix branch and commit and push your fix directly. |
| |
| 2. **Preferable**: You may also make a pull request through GitHub against the |
| bug fix branch rather than against master. Normally when making a pull |
| request from a branch on your fork to the `astropy core repository`_, GitHub |
| compares your branch to Astropy's master. If you look on the left-hand |
| side of the pull request page, under "base repo: astropy/astropy" there is |
| a drop-down list labeled "base branch: master". You can click on this |
| drop-down and instead select the bug fix branch ("v1.2.x" for example). Then |
| GitHub will instead compare your fix against that branch, and merge into |
| that branch when the PR is accepted. |
|
|
|
|
| .. _release-procedure-bug-fix-release: |
|
|
| Preparing the bug fix branch for release |
| ---------------------------------------- |
|
|
| There are two primary steps that need to be taken before creating a bug fix |
| release. The rest of the procedure is the same as any other release as |
| described in :ref:`release-procedure` (although be sure to provide the |
| right version number). |
|
|
| 1. Any existing fixes to the issues assigned to a release milestone (and older |
| LTS releases, if there are any), must be included in the maintenance branch |
| before release. |
|
|
| 2. The Astropy changelog must be updated to list all issues--especially |
| user-visible issues--fixed for the current release. The changelog should |
| be updated in the master branch, and then merged into the bug fix branch. |
| Most issues *should* already have changelog entries for them. But |
| occasionally these are forgotten, so if doesn't exist yet please add one in |
| the process of backporting. See :ref:`changelog-format` for more details. |
| |
| To aid this process, there are a series of related scripts in the |
| `astropy-procedures repository`_, in the ``pr_consistency`` directory. These scripts |
| essentially check that the above two conditions are met. Detailed documentation |
| for these scripts is given in their repository, but here we summarize the basic |
| workflow. Run the scripts in order (they are numbered 1.<something>.py, |
| 2.<something>.py, etc.), entering your github login credentials as needed (if |
| you are going to run them multiple times, using a ``~/.netrc`` file is |
| recommended - see `this Stack Overflow post |
| <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5343068/is-there-a-way-to-skip-password-typing-when-using-https-on-github/18362082>`_ |
| for more on how to do that, or |
| `a similar github help page <https://help.github.com/articles/caching-your-github-password-in-git>`_). |
| The script to actually check consistency should be run like: |
| |
| $ python 4.check_consistency.py > consistency.html |
| |
| Which will generate a simple web page that shows all of the areas where either |
| a pull request was merged into master but is *not* in the relevant release that |
| it has been milestoned for, as well as any changelog irregularities (i.e., PRs |
| that are in the wrong section for what the github milestone indicates). You'll |
| want to correct those irregularities *first* before starting the backport |
| process (re-running the scripts in order as needed). |
|
|
| The end of the ``consistency.html`` page will then show a series of |
| ``git cherry-pick`` commands to update the maintenance branch with the PRs that |
| are needed to make the milestones and branches consistent. Make sure you're in |
| the correct maintenance branch with e.g., |
| |
| $ git checkout v1.3.x |
| $ git pull upstream v1.3.x # Or possibly a rebase if conflicts exist |
| |
| if you are doing bugfixes for the 1.3.x series. Go through the commands one at a |
| time, following the cherry-picking procedure described above. If for some reason |
| you determine the github milestone was in error and the backporting is |
| impossible, re-label the issue on github and move on. Also, whenever you |
| backport a PR, it's useful to leave a comment in the issue along the lines of |
| "backported this to v1.3.x as <SHA>" so that it's clear that the backport |
| happened to others who might later look. |
| |
| .. warning:: |
| |
| Automated scripts are never perfect, and can either miss issues that need to |
| be backported, or in some cases can report false positives. |
| |
| It's always a good idea before finalizing a bug fix release to look on |
| GitHub through the list of closed issues in the release milestone and check |
| that each one has a fix in the bug fix branch. Usually a quick way to do |
| this is for each issue to run:: |
|
|
| $ git log --oneline <bugfix-branch> | grep |
|
|
| Most fixes will mention their related issue in the commit message, so this |
| tends to be pretty reliable. Some issues won't show up in the commit log, |
| however, as their fix is in a separate pull request. Usually GitHub makes |
| this clear by cross-referencing the issue with its PR. A future version |
| of the ``suggest_backports.py`` script will perform this check |
| automatically. |
| |
| Finally, not all issues assigned to a release milestone need to be fixed before |
| making that release. Usually, in the interest of getting a release with |
| existing fixes out within some schedule, it's best to triage issues that won't |
| be fixed soon to a new release milestone. If the upcoming bug fix release is |
| 'v1.2.2', then go ahead and create a 'v1.2.3' milestone and reassign to it any |
| issues that you don't expect to be fixed in time for 'v1.2.2'. |
|
|
|
|
| .. _helpers-release-info: |
|
|
| Coordinating Astropy and astropy-helpers Releases |
| ================================================= |
|
|
| A bit more initial effort is required for an Astropy release that has a |
| corresponding astropy-helpers release. The main reason for this more complex |
| procedure is to allow the Astropy core to be tested against the new helpers |
| before anything is released. Hence the following procedure should be added |
| to the beginning of the above procedure when this is required. This procedure |
| applies both for regular release *and* release candidates are the same |
| (except that version numbers have ``rc |
|
|
| |
| "tmp-release-v<version>":: |
|
|
| $ cd /wherever/you/put/astropy/astropy_helpers |
| $ git branch tmp-release-v<version> <maintenance branch name> |
|
|
| |
| version info and as described in the release instructions above. |
|
|
| |
| github:: |
|
|
| $ git push upstream tmp-release-v<version> |
|
|
| |
| are doing), issue a PR updating the helpers to the commit described in the |
| last step (i.e., the commit at the head of the "tmp-release-v<version>" |
| branch you just created). The easiest way to do this is:: |
|
|
| $ cd /wherever/you/put/astropy |
| $ cd astropy_helpers |
| $ git fetch upstream |
| $ git checkout upstream/tmp-release-v<version> |
| $ cd .. |
| $ cp astropy_helpers/ah_bootstrap.py . |
| $ git add astropy_helpers ah_bootstrap.py |
| $ git commit -m "updated helpers to v<version>" |
|
|
| |
| to ensure the release commit of the helpers works with the to-be-released |
| version of Astropy. |
|
|
| |
| procedure. You'll need to either delete the previous "tmp-release-v<version>" |
| branch on the github `astropy-helpers repository`_ or use ``git push -f`` |
| when you push up the replacement temporary release branch. You can re-use the |
| PR into the `astropy core repository`_ (created in the step just before this |
| one) by updating the ``astropy_helpers`` submodule to point to the new |
| "tmp-release-v<version>" from *after* the fix - that way you don't need to |
| make another PR for the fixed version. |
|
|
| |
| in the helpers repo:: |
|
|
| $ git checkout <maintenance branch name> |
| $ git merge --no-ff tmp-release-v<version> |
| $ git tag -s "v<version>" -m "Tagging v<version>" |
| $ git clean -dfx |
| $ umask 0022 |
| $ chmod -R a+Xr . |
| $ python setup.py build sdist |
| $ gpg --detach-sign -a dist/astropy-helpers-<version>.tar.gz |
| $ twine upload dist/astropy-helpers-<version>.tar.gz* |
| $ git push upstream v<version>.x |
| $ git push upstream v<version> |
|
|
|
|
| |
| `astropy-helpers repository`_ to reflect the release you just did (detailed |
| instructions are above). |
|
|
| |
|
|
| $ git push upstream :tmp-release-v<version> |
|
|
| |
| continue with the release process for the core as described above. |
|
|
| This way the commit of the helpers that is tagged as the release is the same |
| commit that the astropy_helpers submodule will be on when the PR to astropy |
| testing the release gets merged. |
|
|
|
|
| .. _key-signing-info: |
|
|
| Creating a GPG Signing Key and a Signed Tag |
| =========================================== |
|
|
| One of the main steps in performing a release is to create a tag in the git |
| repository representing the exact state of the repository that represents the |
| version being released. For Astropy we will always use `signed tags`_: A |
| signed tag is annotated with the name and e-mail address of the signer, a date |
| and time, and a checksum of the code in the tag. This information is then |
| signed with a GPG private key and stored in the repository. |
|
|
| Using a signed tag ensures the integrity of the contents of that tag for the |
| future. On a distributed VCS like git, anyone can create a tag of Astropy |
| called "0.1" in their repository--and where it's easy to monkey around even |
| after the tag has been created. But only one "0.1" will be signed by one of |
| the Astropy Project coordinators and will be verifiable with their public key. |
| |
| Generating a public/private key pair |
| ------------------------------------ |
| |
| Git uses GPG to created signed tags, so in order to perform an Astropy release |
| you will need GPG installed and will have to generated a signing key pair. |
| Most \*NIX installations come with GPG installed by default (as it is used to |
| verify the integrity of system packages). If you don't have the ``gpg`` |
| command, consult the documentation for your system on how to install it. |
|
|
| For OSX, GPG can be installed from MacPorts using ``sudo port install gnupg``. |
|
|
| To create a new public/private key pair, run:: |
|
|
| $ gpg --gen-key |
|
|
| This will take you through a few interactive steps. For the encryption |
| and expiry settings, it should be safe to use the default settings (I use |
| a key size of 4096 just because what does a couple extra kilobytes |
| hurt?) Enter your full name, preferably including your middle name or |
| middle initial, and an e-mail address that you expect to be active for a |
| decent amount of time. Note that this name and e-mail address must match |
| the info you provide as your git configuration, so you should either |
| choose the same name/e-mail address when you create your key, or update |
| your git configuration to match the key info. Finally, choose a very good |
| pass phrase that won't be easily subject to brute force attacks. |
| |
| |
| If you expect to use the same key for some time, it's good to make a backup of |
| both your public and private key:: |
|
|
| $ gpg --export --armor > public.key |
| $ gpg --export-secret-key --armor > private.key |
|
|
| Back up these files to a trusted location--preferably a write-once physical |
| medium that can be stored safely somewhere. One may also back up their keys to |
| a trusted online encrypted storage, though some might not find that secure |
| enough--it's up to you and what you're comfortable with. |
|
|
| Add your public key to a keyserver |
| ---------------------------------- |
| Now that you have a public key, you can publish this anywhere you like--in your |
| e-mail, in a public code repository, etc. You can also upload it to a |
| dedicated public OpenPGP keyserver. This will store the public key |
| indefinitely (until you manually revoke it), and will be automatically synced |
| with other keyservers around the world. That makes it easy to retrieve your |
| public key using the gpg command-line tool. |
|
|
| To do this you will need your public key's keyname. To find this enter:: |
| |
| $ gpg --list-keys |
| |
| This will output something like:: |
| |
| /path/to/.gnupg/pubring.gpg |
| --------------------------------------------- |
| pub 4096D/1234ABCD 2012-01-01 |
| uid Your Name <your_email> |
| sub 4096g/567890EF 2012-01-01 |
| |
| The 8 digit hex number on the line starting with "pub"--in this example the |
| "1234ABCD" unique keyname for your public key. To push it to a keyserver |
| enter:: |
| |
| $ gpg --send-keys 1234ABCD |
| |
| But replace the 1234ABCD with the keyname for your public key. Most systems |
| come configured with a sensible default keyserver, so you shouldn't have to |
| specify any more than that. |
|
|
| Create a tag |
| ------------ |
| Now test creating a signed tag in git. It's safe to experiment with this--you |
| can always delete the tag before pushing it to a remote repository:: |
| |
| $ git tag -s v0.1 -m "Astropy version 0.1" |
| |
| This will ask for the password to unlock your private key in order to sign |
| the tag with it. Confirm that the default signing key selected by git is the |
| correct one (it will be if you only have one key). |
| |
| Once the tag has been created, you can verify it with:: |
| |
| $ git tag -v v0.1 |
| |
| This should output something like:: |
| |
| object e8e3e3edc82b02f2088f4e974dbd2fe820c0d934 |
| type commit |
| tag v0.1 |
| tagger Your Name <your_email> 1339779534 -0400 |
| |
| Astropy version 0.1 |
| gpg: Signature made Fri 15 Jun 2012 12:59:04 PM EDT using DSA key ID 0123ABCD |
| gpg: Good signature from "Your Name <your_email>" |
| |
| You can use this to verify signed tags from any repository as long as you have |
| the signer's public key in your keyring. In this case you signed the tag |
| yourself, so you already have your public key. |
|
|
| Note that if you are planning to do a release following the steps below, you |
| will want to delete the tag you just created, because the release script does |
| that for you. You can delete this tag by doing:: |
|
|
| $ git tag -d v0.1 |
|
|
|
|
| .. _astropy core repository: https://github.com/astropy/astropy |
| .. _signed tags: http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Basics-Tagging |
| .. _cython: http://www.cython.org/ |
| .. _astropy-procedures repository: https://github.com/astropy/astropy-procedures |
| .. _Anaconda: https://conda.io/docs/ |
| .. _astropy-helpers repository: https://github.com/astropy/astropy-helpers |
| .. _twine: https://packaging.python.org/key_projects/ |
|
|