hc99's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
a89d35f verified
raw
history blame
9.57 kB
.. _custom_policy:
Custom Policy Network
=====================
Stable Baselines3 provides policy networks for images (CnnPolicies)
and other type of input features (MlpPolicies).
.. warning::
For A2C and PPO, continuous actions are clipped during training and testing
(to avoid out of bound error). SAC, DDPG and TD3 squash the action, using a ``tanh()`` transformation,
which handles bounds more correctly.
Custom Policy Architecture
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
One way of customising the policy network architecture is to pass arguments when creating the model,
using ``policy_kwargs`` parameter:
.. code-block:: python
import gym
import torch as th
from stable_baselines3 import PPO
# Custom MLP policy of two layers of size 32 each with Relu activation function
policy_kwargs = dict(activation_fn=th.nn.ReLU, net_arch=[32, 32])
# Create the agent
model = PPO("MlpPolicy", "CartPole-v1", policy_kwargs=policy_kwargs, verbose=1)
# Retrieve the environment
env = model.get_env()
# Train the agent
model.learn(total_timesteps=100000)
# Save the agent
model.save("ppo-cartpole")
del model
# the policy_kwargs are automatically loaded
model = PPO.load("ppo-cartpole")
You can also easily define a custom architecture for the policy (or value) network:
.. note::
Defining a custom policy class is equivalent to passing ``policy_kwargs``.
However, it lets you name the policy and so usually makes the code clearer.
``policy_kwargs`` is particularly useful when doing hyperparameter search.
Custom Feature Extractor
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you want to have a custom feature extractor (e.g. custom CNN when using images), you can define class
that derives from ``BaseFeaturesExtractor`` and then pass it to the model when training.
.. code-block:: python
import gym
import torch as th
import torch.nn as nn
from stable_baselines3 import PPO
from stable_baselines3.common.torch_layers import BaseFeaturesExtractor
class CustomCNN(BaseFeaturesExtractor):
"""
:param observation_space: (gym.Space)
:param features_dim: (int) Number of features extracted.
This corresponds to the number of unit for the last layer.
"""
def __init__(self, observation_space: gym.spaces.Box, features_dim: int = 256):
super(CustomCNN, self).__init__(observation_space, features_dim)
# We assume CxHxW images (channels first)
# Re-ordering will be done by pre-preprocessing or wrapper
n_input_channels = observation_space.shape[0]
self.cnn = nn.Sequential(
nn.Conv2d(n_input_channels, 32, kernel_size=8, stride=4, padding=0),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Conv2d(32, 64, kernel_size=4, stride=2, padding=0),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Flatten(),
)
# Compute shape by doing one forward pass
with th.no_grad():
n_flatten = self.cnn(
th.as_tensor(observation_space.sample()[None]).float()
).shape[1]
self.linear = nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(n_flatten, features_dim), nn.ReLU())
def forward(self, observations: th.Tensor) -> th.Tensor:
return self.linear(self.cnn(observations))
policy_kwargs = dict(
features_extractor_class=CustomCNN,
features_extractor_kwargs=dict(features_dim=128),
)
model = PPO("CnnPolicy", "BreakoutNoFrameskip-v4", policy_kwargs=policy_kwargs, verbose=1)
model.learn(1000)
On-Policy Algorithms
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Shared Networks
---------------
The ``net_arch`` parameter of ``A2C`` and ``PPO`` policies allows to specify the amount and size of the hidden layers and how many
of them are shared between the policy network and the value network. It is assumed to be a list with the following
structure:
1. An arbitrary length (zero allowed) number of integers each specifying the number of units in a shared layer.
If the number of ints is zero, there will be no shared layers.
2. An optional dict, to specify the following non-shared layers for the value network and the policy network.
It is formatted like ``dict(vf=[<value layer sizes>], pi=[<policy layer sizes>])``.
If it is missing any of the keys (pi or vf), no non-shared layers (empty list) is assumed.
In short: ``[<shared layers>, dict(vf=[<non-shared value network layers>], pi=[<non-shared policy network layers>])]``.
Examples
~~~~~~~~
Two shared layers of size 128: ``net_arch=[128, 128]``
.. code-block:: none
obs
|
<128>
|
<128>
/ \
action value
Value network deeper than policy network, first layer shared: ``net_arch=[128, dict(vf=[256, 256])]``
.. code-block:: none
obs
|
<128>
/ \
action <256>
|
<256>
|
value
Initially shared then diverging: ``[128, dict(vf=[256], pi=[16])]``
.. code-block:: none
obs
|
<128>
/ \
<16> <256>
| |
action value
Advanced Example
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If your task requires even more granular control over the policy/value architecture, you can redefine the policy directly:
.. code-block:: python
from typing import Callable, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple, Type, Union
import gym
import torch as th
from torch import nn
from stable_baselines3 import PPO
from stable_baselines3.common.policies import ActorCriticPolicy
class CustomNetwork(nn.Module):
"""
Custom network for policy and value function.
It receives as input the features extracted by the feature extractor.
:param feature_dim: dimension of the features extracted with the features_extractor (e.g. features from a CNN)
:param last_layer_dim_pi: (int) number of units for the last layer of the policy network
:param last_layer_dim_vf: (int) number of units for the last layer of the value network
"""
def __init__(
self,
feature_dim: int,
last_layer_dim_pi: int = 64,
last_layer_dim_vf: int = 64,
):
super(CustomNetwork, self).__init__()
# IMPORTANT:
# Save output dimensions, used to create the distributions
self.latent_dim_pi = last_layer_dim_pi
self.latent_dim_vf = last_layer_dim_vf
# Policy network
self.policy_net = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(feature_dim, last_layer_dim_pi), nn.ReLU()
)
# Value network
self.value_net = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(feature_dim, last_layer_dim_vf), nn.ReLU()
)
def forward(self, features: th.Tensor) -> Tuple[th.Tensor, th.Tensor]:
"""
:return: (th.Tensor, th.Tensor) latent_policy, latent_value of the specified network.
If all layers are shared, then ``latent_policy == latent_value``
"""
return self.policy_net(features), self.value_net(features)
class CustomActorCriticPolicy(ActorCriticPolicy):
def __init__(
self,
observation_space: gym.spaces.Space,
action_space: gym.spaces.Space,
lr_schedule: Callable[[float], float],
net_arch: Optional[List[Union[int, Dict[str, List[int]]]]] = None,
activation_fn: Type[nn.Module] = nn.Tanh,
*args,
**kwargs,
):
super(CustomActorCriticPolicy, self).__init__(
observation_space,
action_space,
lr_schedule,
net_arch,
activation_fn,
# Pass remaining arguments to base class
*args,
**kwargs,
)
# Disable orthogonal initialization
self.ortho_init = False
def _build_mlp_extractor(self) -> None:
self.mlp_extractor = CustomNetwork(self.features_dim)
model = PPO(CustomActorCriticPolicy, "CartPole-v1", verbose=1)
model.learn(5000)
Off-Policy Algorithms
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you need a network architecture that is different for the actor and the critic when using ``SAC``, ``DDPG`` or ``TD3``,
you can pass a dictionary of the following structure: ``dict(qf=[<critic network architecture>], pi=[<actor network architecture>])``.
For example, if you want a different architecture for the actor (aka ``pi``) and the critic (Q-function aka ``qf``) networks,
then you can specify ``net_arch=dict(qf=[400, 300], pi=[64, 64])``.
Otherwise, to have actor and critic that share the same network architecture,
you only need to specify ``net_arch=[256, 256]`` (here, two hidden layers of 256 units each).
.. note::
Compared to their on-policy counterparts, no shared layers (other than the feature extractor)
between the actor and the critic are allowed (to prevent issues with target networks).
.. code-block:: python
from stable_baselines3 import SAC
# Custom actor architecture with two layers of 64 units each
# Custom critic architecture with two layers of 400 and 300 units
policy_kwargs = dict(net_arch=dict(pi=[64, 64], qf=[400, 300]))
# Create the agent
model = SAC("MlpPolicy", "Pendulum-v0", policy_kwargs=policy_kwargs, verbose=1)
model.learn(5000)