After the trial, it was found that at around 1:00 a.m. on September 29, 2020, the defendants, Shi and Zhu, colluded and took advantage of the absence of personnel to steal five coal powder spray nozzles and eight flame-stabilizing teeth from Workshop No. 5 of Jiangsu Jingcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in Xinqiao Town of this city, with a total value of 6,720 RMB. At around 4:00 a.m. on October 1, 2020, the defendant Shi once again took advantage of the absence of personnel to steal two coal powder spray nozzles from the same location, valued at 1,008 RMB. After the defendants Shi and Zhu were apprehended, they confessed to their crimes truthfully. Following the incident, the public security bureau lawfully seized 505 RMB and two coal powder spray nozzles from Shi, and eight flame-stabilizing teeth stolen by Zhu. Except for the 505 RMB temporarily kept at the public security bureau, the remaining items were returned to the victimized unit. During the trial in this court, the defendant Shi returned unlawful gains amounting to 2,520 RMB. This court commissioned the Jingjiang City Judicial Bureau to investigate the social behavior and community supervision conditions of the defendants Shi and Zhu. After the investigation, the bureau concluded that Shi and Zhu pose little social danger in applying community corrections and have minimal impact on the villages where they reside. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged without objection by the defendants Shi and Zhu during the trial, where they signed and confirmed the statements. The case is supported by verified evidence such as police incident registration forms, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decision documents, arrest records, testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Tan, and Shen, a valuation report issued by the Jingjiang City Price Appraisal Center, identification records and photos, search records and photos, seizure records, seizure decision documents, lists of seized and returned items, weighing records and photos, the investigation and evaluation report issued by the Jingjiang City Judicial Bureau, and the basic identity information of the defendants Shi and Zhu, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial investigation, it was found: From May to June 2018, defendants Ding and Xue committed two thefts in Fangdu Office, a certain county, and in a particular township, stealing a total of 4,200 Yuan in cash from victims Ji and Wang. The specific facts are as follows: 1. On May 28, 2018, at approximately 10:30 AM, defendants Ding and Xue went to Ji's home in a village under Fangdu Office, a certain county, under the pretense of taking photos for subsidies. Taking advantage of an opportunity, they stole 3,400 Yuan from a bag inside Ji's home. 2. On June 1, 2018, at approximately 10:34 AM, Ding and Xue went to Wang's home in a village under a certain camp in the county, under the guise of investigating subsidy distribution to the elderly, and stole 800 Yuan from a bag inside Wang's home while he was unprepared. 3. On June 16, 2018, at around 7 AM, defendants Ding and Xue went to Ma's home in a village under Nanlu Office in the county intending to commit theft, but were thwarted by Ma, who was passing by. Defendant Xue was captured on the spot. On July 14, 2018, defendant Ding was captured by police from the county public security bureau. After the defendants Ding and Xue were brought to justice, they both truthfully confessed to all criminal facts. After the case, defendants Ding and Xue compensated the victims for all economic losses, and their actions have gained the victims' understanding. Defendant Xue was administratively detained for eight days (from June 16, 2018 to June 24, 2018) and fined 200 Yuan due to the third theft case, which has now been revoked. During the trial, defendants Ding and Xue had no objection to the above facts, which were confirmed by testimony from victims Ji and Wang, witness Ma's testimony, lists of seized and returned items produced by the county public security bureau, revocation of administrative penalty decisions, letters of understanding, the case solving process, arrest process, previous records, and household registration information, providing sufficient evidence for recognition.


The prosecution alleges that starting in late October 2013, the defendant Ye, without approval from the environmental protection department, established an electroplating processing site in his own home in a certain village of a certain city. On February 12, 2014, defendant Li was hired by Ye to work at the processing site, carrying out electroplating tasks. Defendant Li directly discharged the wastewater generated from the electroplating process onto the ground of the processing site, which eventually flowed into the outside river channels. The site was raided on March 31, 2014. Tests conducted by a city's environmental monitoring center showed that the illegal electroplating site's discharged wastewater contained zinc with a concentration of 424mg/L and hexavalent chromium with a concentration of 1000mg/L, both exceeding the electroplating pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department agreed to approve this monitoring report. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Ye and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhi, and Wang, the arrest process records, monitoring reports and approval opinions, identification records, on-site investigation records, verification proof of criminal history, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.


The prosecution alleges: From June 2012 to February 2013, the defendant Liu illegally accessed the back-end of the cash register system of Jindu Internet Cafe on Baotou Road, Daqi Street, a district in a certain city. Liu changed the owner's permissions to employee permissions and created an account "a" with the password "123456." Liu used this account multiple times to top up for himself and people who came to surf the internet, thereby stealing funds from the internet cafe. In October 2012, Liu told the cashier of Jindu Internet Cafe, Zong, and the network administrator, Ran, the account and password. Defendant Zong created an account "jdwbb" and informed Ran about the account and password. Defendant Liu used the account "a," defendant Zong used the accounts "a," "jdwbb," and "SY," and defendant Ran used the accounts "a" and "jdwbb" to recharge others illegally and steal cash from the internet cafe. After the incident, Zong’s family compensated the victim with 20,000 yuan, and the victim forgave Zong. During the trial process, defendants Liu, Zong, and Ran admitted that they respectively stole 8,000 yuan, 10,000 yuan, and 6,000 yuan in cash during the process of modifying member accounts. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Zong, and Ran during the court proceedings. Additionally, these are confirmed by the victim Zhang's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang and Xiang, among others, identification records and photos, a summary and data modification log of member information changes and the total amount modified through the internet cafe’s back-end management system from 2012 to 2013, and evidence provided by the police, such as the arrest process record, explanatory notes, public security administrative penalty decision, letter of understanding, social investigation report, household registration certificate, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After examination, it was found: Defendant Hu (formerly the manager of the Franchise Department of XX City XXX Food Store) colluded with defendant Zhou (formerly the regional manager of the XXX Franchise Department), Wang (formerly the assistant manager of the XXX Franchise Department), Wang Moumou, and others during the negotiations in August 2014 for franchisee Shi to join. They utilized their positions responsible for negotiation and transfer without the company's knowledge to privately decide to transfer the franchising rights of Tonglu XXX franchise store to Shi, instructing Shi to pay a franchise transfer fee of 300,000 yuan. Of this, 130,000 yuan was paid as a transfer fee to He of the Tonglu franchise, and the remaining 170,000 yuan was embezzled by defendants Hu, Wang, Zhou, and others. Defendant Hu received 84,000 yuan, defendant Wang received 56,000 yuan, and defendant Zhou received 10,000 yuan. Xie (handled in a separate case) knowingly accepted 5,000 yuan given by defendant Hu, which was illegally obtained, and used it for personal purposes. On February 2, 2016, defendants Hu, Zhou, and Wang compensated the full loss and received Shi's understanding. On February 25, 2016, defendants Wang and Zhou surrendered themselves to the Yiwu City Public Security Bureau. These facts were undisputed by defendants Hu, Wang, and Zhou during the trial and were supported by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Jin, He, Liu, Shi, and Xie; receipts; franchise agreements; transfer vouchers; payrolls; business licenses; criminal judgment documents; transfer agreements; situation explanations; payment receipts; letters of understanding; arrest procedures; the confessions of defendants Hu, Zhou, Wang; and identification proofs. This evidence is sufficient to confirm the facts.


The County People's Procuratorate charges: In June 2012, defendants Zhan and Cao jointly agreed to purchase the trees on "He Jupao" mountain land and "Qiluwa" mountain land from He for RMB 2,000. In March 2013, defendants Zhan and Cao again jointly agreed to purchase the trees on "Jinjiawubian" mountain land from Li for RMB 1,000. When felling trees on these three pieces of mountain land, Zhan and Cao did not obtain a "Timber Harvesting Permit." The logged trees were all Masson pine. According to the appraisal by the county forestry engineer, the standing timber volume of the Masson pine felled on the three pieces of mountain land totaled 16.17 cubic meters. The county price certification center appraised the value of the illegally felled trees at a total of RMB 7,276. After the incident, defendants Zhan and Cao returned the illegal proceeds of RMB 7,276 to the county forest public security bureau. In support of the charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including witness testimonies, confessions of the defendants, expert opinions, and on-site inspection records.


The prosecution charges: On November 2, 2015, defendant Wu, after prior arrangement, agreed to sell 0.62 grams of methamphetamine (ice) for 500 RMB to Ge. That evening, defendants Wu and Xiao colluded and went to the intersection of Renmin South Road and Yuxiu Road in our district, where they sold 0.62 grams of methamphetamine to Ge for 500 RMB. Later, they were apprehended on the spot by waiting police officers, who subsequently discovered an additional 0.74 grams of methamphetamine from defendant Xiao.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Yang had a colleague relationship with the victim Xiang. After Xiang was dismissed from the company, he believed it was Yang's responsibility and demanded compensation from Yang. Yang informed her husband, He, about this matter. After learning about it, the defendant He asked his cousin, Mi (handled in a separate case), to help resolve the matter. Later, Yang and Xiang agreed to meet opposite a certain credit union near a square on Fuyong Street, Baoan District, to discuss the issue.

On the afternoon of February 8, 2004, Yang, He, and Mi went to a certain hair salon in a village to find Feng (nicknamed "Lanmoumou," already sentenced) for help in settling the matter. Feng then instructed Su (alias Li B, nicknamed "Laomoumou," already sentenced), "Li A" (handled in a separate case), and "Amoumou" (handled in a separate case) to gather others. Su and "Amoumou" gathered Hu 1 (already sentenced) and Hu 2 (already sentenced), while "Li A" gathered


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: At around 16:00 on December 26, 2013, the defendants Chen and Hu, along with "A Mo Mo" (handled in a separate case), carried tools and rode a motorcycle to the front of "HSBC Textile" at No. 168, Building E1, Cowboy City, Xintang Town, a certain city. They intended to steal a Yamaha Fuxi ladies' motorcycle (valued at 4,380 RMB according to the appraisal) belonging to the victim, Wu Yi, which was parked at that location. They were discovered by Liu Bing and others, colleagues of Wu Yi, who attempted to stop them. The defendant Hu and others resisted capture by wielding a knife in a threatening manner and forcibly drove away with the motorcycle. The prosecution presented the defendants' confessions, the victim's statements, and other related evidence in court to prove the charges. Accordingly,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from December 22, 2018, to January 5, 2019, the defendants Liu, Xue, and Du colluded together at Liu's home in a certain district of a certain place, using a program-controlled mahjong machine to organize others for gambling. Among them, Liu directly participated in the gambling, Xue was responsible for controlling the mahjong machine to cheat, and Du was responsible for keeping watch. Through this method, the three organized gambling for profit on four occasions, making a total profit of 33,800 yuan. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence including household registration certificates, the process of bringing the suspects to justice, the decision to approve arrest, testimonies of witnesses including Wang, Gao, Luo, Yan, Xiao, and others, seizure decision and list, identification records, identification photos, and identification explanations, as well as confessions from the defendants Liu, Xue, and Du.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on October 27, 2014, at about 14:00, the defendant Xu had an altercation with Ju over a computer while using the internet at the "Junlin" Internet cafe in a town of a certain county. Xu then called the defendant Ruan to come to the internet cafe. After Ruan arrived at the Junlin Internet cafe, Xu informed Ruan about the matter of the computer dispute and took Ruan to confront Ju. Ju's friend, Han, came over to help, and a conflict broke out between the parties, leading to a scuffle. Ruan punched and kicked Han, knocking Han to the ground. Xu punched and kicked Ju, and subsequently, Ruan attacked Ju. Xu also kicked Han, who was lying on the ground, a few times. According to the forensic medical examination by the Public Security Bureau of a certain county, Han's right foot fracture was identified as a minor injury of the second degree, and Ju's injuries were classified as minor injuries. On October 28, 2014, Xu and Ruan volunta


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 23:00 on December 11, 2014, Ren Moujia was beaten and stabbed by the bar staff in the Lechao Bar in Xiaoyi City. After notifying his brother Ren Mou by phone, Ren Mou called Li (already prosecuted) to go and take a look. The defendant Li then contacted the defendants Lu, Tang, Chen, and others to go to Lechao Bar. Seeing the bar's main door tightly closed, Li instructed the defendants Lu, Tang, Chen, Xiao Moumou, and Da Moumou (the identities of Xiao Moumou and Da Moumou are unknown) to break the glass door of the bar. According to the Xiaoyi City Price Appraisal Center, the loss value of the bar's glass door was 7,500 yuan. The above facts are supported by the report materials and the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, price appraisal opinions, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants. The actions of the defendants Lu, Tang, and Chen have violated the criminal law and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. The three defendants constitute voluntary surrender. Please convict according to the law. The defendants Lu, Tang, and Chen have no objection to the facts of the charges and voluntarily plead guilty in court.

After trial, it was found that: At around 23:00 on December 11, 2014, Ren Moujia was beaten and stabbed by the bar staff in Lechao Bar, Xiaoyi City. After notifying his brother Ren Mou by phone, Ren Mou called Li (already convicted) to go and take a l


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Hebei Province charged that on the afternoon of May 24, 2014, defendant Guo, in collusion with defendant Sun and others, intercepted a green pickup truck driven by Mu at the intersection of China State Construction Seventh Bureau in a certain city. They assaulted Mu and Wu with a pickaxe handle and damaged the green pickup truck. Forensic assessment determined that victims Mu and Wu sustained minor injuries, and the damage to the vehicle amounted to 3,882 yuan. Additionally, it was found that on June 13, 2014, defendant Guo voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. On June 15 of the same year, defendant Sun also voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. After the incident, the civil aspect of the case has now been resolved through mediation, and the victims Mu and Wu have forgiven the defendants. The facts mentioned above were not contested by defendants Guo and Sun during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Mu and Wu, the testimonies of witnesses Bian, Yan, Gao, Pang, and Ma, the identification records involved in the case, the scene diagrams of the damaged items, photos of the damaged vehicle, documents listing seized items, a CD, appraisal report numbers 494 and 495 (2014) from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, price appraisal conclusion document number 102 (2014) from the Price Appraisal Center for Involved Items in a certain city, the mediation agreement and receipt, the account of the case provided by the Development Zone Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and the identity information of defendants Guo and Sun, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found that on May 6, 2015, at around 17:00, defendants Qi and Yu, in order to collect debts for the Zhongshan branch of Shenzhen XX Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd., gathered individuals including Qi A, "A certain" and others (who are being handled separately) to take the victim, Wen Han, from his home located at XXXXX No. 1, a certain town in a certain city, to rooms 201 and 1002 on the second floor of the KTV at XXXX Hotel in the West District of a certain city, among other places, to detain him. During this period, defendants Qi and Yu physically assaulted the victim, Wen Yi, causing injuries. On May 7, around 19:00, defendants Qi and Yu released Wen Yi after demanding that he raise funds. On July 1 and July 21 of the same year, police officers successively captured defendants Qi and Yu in XXXX in the West District, and in a chess and card room in the West District. According to an appraisal, the wounds on the victim Wen Yi were consistent with blunt force trauma, and the injuries were minor. The facts above were not disputed by defendants Qi and Yu during the trial and were substantiated by evidence including the statement of the victim Wen Yi, the arrest reports from the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the San Jiao Sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, seizure records and lists, on-site diagrams and photos, the "Forensic Injury Examination Certificate" and injury photos provided by the San Jiao Sub-bureau of a certain city's Public Securit


The People's Procuratorate of Helan County, in a certain Hui district, accused the defendants Zhou and Ma. Zhou, who was the owner of a certain village shop, sought to reduce his electricity costs in February 2017 and asked the defendant Ma if it could be done. Ma stated it was possible. Subsequently, Zhou removed the functioning electric meter (meter number 0004593896) installed by the Helan County Power Supply Bureau from his shop, gave it to Ma, and paid Ma 2,800 yuan. Ma then found someone to alter the meter and returned it to Zhou, who installed the modified meter back in his shop. Later, staff from the local power company, Helan Power Supply Company, discovered the meter had been tampered with during an inspection. Upon reviewing the restaurant's electricity bill records from February 2017 to January 2019, it was found that the payments were significantly lower than normal. The case was reported to the police, and an investigation confirmed that 14,000 yuan worth of electricity had been stolen. After the incident, Zhou compensated the victimized power company with 25,024.5 yuan for the stolen electricity, obtaining their understanding. In support of the aforementioned criminal charge, the prosecution submitted evidence to the court, including household registration records, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses from defendants Zhou and Ma, on-site inspection records, identification records and photographs, and appraisal opinions.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At the end of 2011, the defendant Li purchased a silver-gray van with no documentation (engine number 903420249, chassis number LZWACAG998122318) from Zhou (currently at large) near the driving school on the Second Ring Road in Huangmei Town for 6,000 yuan. Around May 2013, Li felt that it was unsafe to drive this van due to the lack of documentation and sold it to the defendant Nie. Nie noticed that the vehicle was clearly below market price and bought the van for 6,000 yuan. On April 16, 2014, at around 14:00, Nie was driving this van when he was stopped by police officers from the Jiujiang Public Security Bureau at the Jiujiang Yangtze River Second Bridge. Upon investigation, it was found that the vehicle was a stolen vehicle belonging to the victim Wu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of Xunyang District, Jiujiang City, the stolen vehicle was valued at 24,017 yuan.


The prosecution alleges: Between March and April 2014, the defendant Jia, in collaboration with Chen (who has been convicted), set up gambling dens in certain villages in a city in Anhui Province, such as a village in the Dongfeng community, and profited by taking a rake-off. During this period, the defendant Zhang invested in the operation for seven days, and the defendant Han was responsible for contacting gamblers and gambling venues, with Chen paying Han 200 yuan daily. The gambling involved the "28 cards" method and lasted more than 20 days, with daily profits exceeding 10,000 yuan. The defendant Jia and Chen evenly split the rake-off profits; during the seven days the defendant Zhang was involved, the profits were split between Chen, Jia, and Zhang. The defendant Jia illegally gained more than 200,000 yuan through rake-offs; the defendant Zhang illegally gained over 70,000 yuan; and the defendant Han illicitly gained over 4,000 yuan. On December 10, 2014, the defendant Jia voluntarily surrendered to the city's public security bureau; on December 5, 2014, the defendant Zhang was apprehended by the public security bureau at the Chengbei police station while conducting business; and on April 5, 2015, the defendant Han was captured by the public security bureau at the city's train station. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above allegations.


A certain People's Procuratorate charged: On the evening of March 8, 2017, at around 11 PM, since the defendants Zou and Hu had no regular income, they decided to steal something and sell it for money. That evening, the two drove Zou's white van to the underground parking lot of the Olympian Holiday Residential Area in the old sports stadium on Gandong Avenue, Fuzhou City. To avoid drawing attention, Hu wore a security uniform to commit the theft while Zou kept watch. Hu then stole a box containing more than 40 mobile phones from the back of the victim Zhang's silver Jetta sedan and fled to a rural area to Hu's home. They found that there were too many phones, picked out a few better ones, and returned the rest to Zhang's car. The Linchuan District Price Accreditation Center later appraised that the stolen phones were worth 6,365 RMB. The evidence used by the public prosecution to bring the charges includes documentary evidence; the victim's statement, Zhang's statement; the defendants' confessions and defenses, Zou and Hu's confessions and defenses; appraisal opinion; and audio-visual materials.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 7 PM on April 18, 2014, defendant Han, after consuming alcohol, walked to near No. 8 Xiuhua Lane, Qinhuai District of this city. There, he encountered Wang driving a vehicle, giving way to an oncoming vehicle. Han inexplicably began to slap and kick the right rear door of Wang's vehicle and assaulted Wang and his son Wang (who was under 14 years old) when they got out to check the situation. During this time, defendant Zhang happened to pass by and assisted defendant Han in jointly assaulting Wang, resulting in Wang sustaining a neck injury from a foreign object, contusions to both eyes, concussive injuries to both retinas, subconjunctival hemorrhage in both eyes, and multiple soft tissue contusions across his body. According to the forensic identification by the Nanjing Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identification Institute, the degree of injury Wang sustained was classified as minor injury level two.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that one night in March 2014, defendants Wang and Xu, after planning, went to an alley near Fortune Street Community, a town street in this city, and stole a Lifan brand 110 model motorcycle parked there by the victim Zhao. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 2,400 yuan. The prosecution provided evidence such as the defendants' confessions and defenses, the victim’s statements, witness testimonies, a price appraisal report, and documentary evidence, believing that both defendants' actions constitute the crime of theft, and requested lawful punishment. Both defendants raised no objections to the facts charged by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Defendant Wang's defense attorney submitted a letter of forgiveness from the victim Zhao and presented the following defense arguments: 1. Defendant Wang has the circumstance of voluntary surrender. 2. Defendant Wang is a first-time offender, has a good attitude towards repentance, the stolen goods have been recovered, and he has been forgiven by the victim. 3. Defendant Wang's family is in extreme financial difficulty. A request is made for leniency in punishment. Upon examination, it was found that one night in March 2014, defendants Wang and Xu, after planning, went to an alley near Fortune Street Community, a town street in this city, and stole a Lifan brand 110 model motorcycle parked there by the victim Zhao. Shortly thereafter, while defendant Wang was pushing the motorcycle to a motorcycle repair shop in the town to change the lock, he was discovered by the victim Zhao, who retrieved the motorcycle. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 2,400 yuan. It was also found that defendant Wang surrendered to the public security organs after the incident. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xu, and are corroborated by evidence such as the victim Zhao’s statements, testimony from witness Yan, price appraisal report, the documentary evidence of the case process, and household registration information, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The prosecution alleges: On November 16, 2014, at approximately 00:58, the defendants Li and Wan, after drinking alcohol, went to the front desk of the Aired Hotel in Fanhua Road, Shushan District, in this city. They insisted on staying at the hotel despite insufficient deposit and were refused by the service staff. Wan began to insult the service staff, Jiang, and twice threw paper from the bar at Jiang. After being hit, Jiang retaliated by hitting Wan with a plastic clipboard in his hand, causing an injury to Wan's head. Subsequently, Wan and Li started to attack Jiang and vandalize items at the hotel front desk, resulting in multiple soft tissue injuries to Jiang and damage to items such as the computer monitor, fax machine, and telephone at the hotel front desk. A valuation determined that the direct economic loss due to the damage to Aired Hotel's items amounted to 10,867 yuan. On March 17, 2015, the defendant Wan voluntarily surrendered to the police; on April 20, 2015, the defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the police. In support of the above charges, the prosecution read and presented in court the confessions and defenses of the defendants Li and Wan, witness statements from Guang, Yang, and others, the statements of the victim Jiang, and the representative of the victimized unit Zhou, on-site inspection records, photos from the crime scene, audiovisual materials, valuation opinions, outpatient medical records, administrative punishment decision, account of the case process, household registration information, and other pieces of evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that around October 2019, the defendant Wang met a person named "An" through WeChat. "An" told Wang that if Wang transferred money to their gambling website account via Alipay and then transferred the money back to Wang through different Alipay accounts, Wang would earn a handling fee of 120 yuan for every 10,000 yuan transferred, essentially running scores for the gambling website. Around November 14-15, 2019, the defendant Wang brought defendants Me and Zhao to Wang's residence in a certain district and purchased a large number of mobile phones. Following An's instructions, they used mobile applications like "Zhuanqianbao" and "Alipay" to assist the online gambling website in running scores to earn illicit gains. On November 25, 2019, defendants Wang, Me, Zhao, and Shao (handled in a separate case) agreed to go to a certain district of a certain city to continue using mobile applications like "Zhuanqianbao" and "Alipay" to help the online gambling website run scores. During this period, defendant Wang was responsible for leasing the venue, providing funds, and purchasing equipment, while the remaining three were responsible for specific operations, until they were arrested by public security authorities. According to the Hengxin Judicial Appraisal Center's assessment, during this period, defendant Me used Alipay to clear payments for the gambling website amounting to 759,040.96 yuan, defendant Zhao processed payments amounting to 1,120,027.59 yuan, and Shao processed payments amounting to 17,065.00 yuan. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution authority read out and presented evidence in court, including confessions of defendants Wang, Me, and Zhao, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Xie, Li, and Shao, Alipay transfer screenshots, on-site investigation records, a list of seized items, seized items, a list of returned items, electronic data inspection records, and judicial appraisal reports.


The prosecution alleged, and this court has found, that on July 30, 2014, the victim, Xie, was lured by an online acquaintance, Ji (female, identity not verified), under the pretense of friendship, to a pyramid scheme den located on the third floor of the first house in the thirteenth row of Zhangdai Community, Zhang Village, in a certain place in Xianning City. To coerce Xie into joining the pyramid scheme and participating in its activities, the "director" of the den, defendant Wang, instructed defendants Yan, Qin, and other pyramid scheme members to confiscate Xie's mobile phone. They restricted Xie's personal freedom by locking the door to prevent Xie from going out freely, using verbal threats, and forcing Xie to "attend classes." On September 3, 2014, this pyramid scheme den was raided by the police, and Xie was rescued. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Wang, Yan, and Qin during the court proceedings and are corroborated by relevant documentary evidence, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Zhong, Xu, and Wan, and the statement of the victim, Xie, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that on December 4, 2013, the victim, Tan, contacted the defendant, Wang, through a phone number on an illegally posted advertisement to request a fetal gender determination. Defendant Wang, in collaboration with defendant Liu, drove to a location near the Hongshu Gas Station on Avenue County in a certain district of a certain city. In the car driven by defendant Liu, defendant Wang used an ultrasound machine purchased online to illegally perform a fetal gender determination for the victim, Tan. It was determined that the victim, Tan, was pregnant with a female fetus, and the parties agreed to carry out an abortion a few days later. On December 7 of the same year, defendant Wang, in collaboration with defendant Liu, drove to Mei Lake Village, on a certain lake in a certain tourism resort area, and took the victim, Tan, and her husband to a house rented by Wang located at River Pond No. xx, Jiangshan Town, a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Wang, without having a medical practitioner's qualification, illegally performed an abortion surgery on the victim, Tan. During the surgery, Tan suffered a uterine perforation, peritonitis, and intestinal perforation. It was assessed that the degree of harm was serious injury. Defendant Wang charged Tan 2,500 yuan in cash. Subsequently, according to the city's medical association, defendant Wang was found to bear full responsibility for the current damages to Tan, with these damages classified as Grade 4. A


Upon examination, it is found that defendants Wu and Hu purchased cough syrup containing narcotic ingredients regulated by the state from others, and then sold it in a certain district, with the profits being equally divided between the two. On the afternoon of September 10, 2015, under police arrangement, Li contacted defendant Wu claiming someone wanted to buy cough syrup and agreed on a transaction price. Subsequently, the police arranged for Cai to purchase the cough syrup. Around 16:00 on that day, defendant Wu informed defendant Hu to conduct a transaction involving 5 bottles of cough syrup and instructed Hu to collect 850 yuan in drug money. Around 17:00, defendant Hu arrived at the south sidewalk of the pedestrian bridge section at Chiwei, Yujinghuacheng, in a certain district as agreed, and handed over 5 bottles of cough syrup (each bottle containing 120 milliliters and after testing, all were found to contain codeine) to Cai, collecting 850 yuan from Cai. After the transaction, defendant Hu was caught in the act by ambush police officers. On September 15, 2015, around 18:00, defendant Wu was apprehended by the police in Room 606 of the comprehensive building at Bibo Primary School in Luohu District, a certain city. On September 10, 2015, defendant Hu reported two drug trafficking cases to the police and assisted in the arrest of the suspects Zhou Chunchun and Hu Bin involved in the case. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the court session and are corroborated by the identity documents of the two defendants, the list of seized items, the explanation of the whereabouts of the drug money, WeChat chat records, situation explanations, arrest process, commendation materials for defendant Hu’s meritorious actions, documentary evidence, and physical evidence such as photos of the drugs and drug money involved; witness testimonies from Li and Cai; the confessions and defenses of the two defendants; the drug test report involved in this case; site survey records, site diagrams, site photos, and identification records, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


Upon examination, it was found: On the afternoon of November 23, 2013, in order to demand repayment from Zhang, defendant Liu took Zhang from the parking lot of the Second Cemetery in a certain city (located in a certain town). Later, defendant Liu teamed up with defendants He and Pan to successively take Zhang to various locations including an inn in the Jinshiqiao Development Zone, a fashion hotel in Quanshan District, and the rental house opposite a hotel in the same city where defendant Pan was staying, to monitor Zhang. On December 6, 2013, when the three defendants took Zhang to his mother's house to discuss repayment issues, they were caught by the police. It was also found that, after coming forward, defendant Pan truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants' actions have been forgiven by Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Pan, and He during the court trial and were confirmed by Zhang's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Du, Zhang Yi, and Zhang Bing, IOUs, loan contracts, hotel registration records, identification and recognition records and household registration certificates produced by the Public Security Bureau of Tongshan District, and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Jilin Province charged that, on the afternoon of January 11, 2021, the defendants Zhao and Yin, carrying pre-prepared tools such as shovels, crowbars, and nets, drove to Wang Xiangtun River in Dongjia Village, a town in the county. There, they broke the ice to hunt wild fish, frogs, and other animals, during which they were caught red-handed by the public security authorities, and 150 frogs were seized. Upon identification, the frogs captured by the defendants Zhao and Yin were determined to be Heilongjiang forest frogs. The two defendants voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their crimes and pled guilty.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At approximately 8:30 a.m. on April 10, 2014, the defendants, Guo and Ceng, used a lock-picking technique to enter room xx, number xx, Songjia Alley, Jiangdong District, in this city to commit theft. They were subsequently apprehended by the police at the scene. During the trial, the defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the statements of the victim, Zhou, the testimonies of witnesses Shen, Li, and Chen, the search record issued by the public security organ, site photographs, the site inspection record, the identification record, the household registration certificate, the police report, the list of seized items, the statement of circumstances, and the documentation of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


Upon review, it was found that from January 2014 to February 2015, the defendants Ren and Liu, a married couple, illegally demolished six old classrooms of the village elementary school. They planned to build a house for their own use on the site of the demolished classrooms. The valuation of the six old classrooms was determined to be 9,900 yuan. The defendants Ren and Liu did not contest these facts during the court proceedings, and there is corroborating evidence from witness testimonies, site photographs, and appraisal conclusions, sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of Yicheng District, a certain city in Henan Province, charged that on November 23, 2017, at 19:55, police officers Cheng and Liu from a certain branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city were handling a dispute involving Nie and Kong at a restaurant located at the west section of a certain road in Yicheng District. The officers verbally summoned the individuals causing the disturbance to the public security organ for investigation. Nie and Kong, due to intoxication, refused to cooperate and falsely shouted "police brutality," thereby creating an incident without cause. During the process of attempting to take them from the scene, Kong scratched officer Liu on the face and neck, while Nie seized officer Cheng's mobile phone used for illumination and caused Cheng to fall. The injury to officer Liu was assessed as minor. It was also found that after the incident, both defendants received the forgiveness of the police officers. The aforementioned facts were not disputed in court by defendants Nie and Kong, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, injury photographs, site video recordings, injury assessment reports, arrest records, household registration documents, and other evidence, providing sufficient grounds for the determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the evening of December 19, 2015, the victim, Chen, had a conflict with the staff of Puledi KTV in the Hangzhou Bay Industrial Park of a certain district in a certain city over the price of drinks. Later, Chen pushed Manager Zhou. Defendants Ye and Zheng, together with Pi and Guo (both handled in separate cases) and others, assaulted victim Chen at random in the lobby of Puledi KTV in the Hangzhou Bay Industrial Park of a certain district in a certain city to vent anger on behalf of Zhou. They also assaulted Liang, who came to intervene, and then left the scene. During this time, Defendant Ye assaulted Chen by punching and kicking him, while Defendant Zheng assaulted Chen by using a beer bottle. Later, Hu (who has been administratively punished) in the aforementioned KTV lobby had a verbal altercation with Liang, which led to a physical conflict. Defendant Ye assaulted Liang again with a wooden stick. According to the assessment, victim Chen sustained minor injuries (one instance), and victim Liang sustained minor injuries (three instances). On May 15 and June 15, 2016, Defendants Ye and Zheng turned themselves in to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the above criminal facts. It was further discovered that after the incident, victim Liang forgave the actions of Defendants Ye and Zheng. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by Defendants Ye and Zheng during the trial, supported by the confessions and defenses of Defendants Zheng and Ye, the confessions of co-defendants Pi and Guo, the statements of victims Chen and Liang, testimonies from witnesses Hu, Xu, Yang, Wang (A), Zhou, Wang (B), Peng, and Luo, on-site inspection records and photos, medical records and photos of injuries, a list of received evidence materials, decision and list of items seized and photos, identification transcripts and photos, surveillance video and screenshots, forensic medical assessment opinion on the degree of bodily injury, letter of understanding, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, account of the arrest, and the household registration data of Defendants Ye and Zheng, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that around January 11, 2018, a resident of the district, Gao (handled separately), established a WeChat gambling group. During the period when Gao and the defendant Huo co-managed this WeChat gambling group, Gao was responsible for inviting gamblers to join the group and participate in gambling. The defendant Huo was responsible for sending gambling links for "Three Cards" (also known as Zha Jinhua) to the WeChat group, organizing multiple gambling activities. After the gambling games ended, the defendant Huo settled the gambling funds with the participants and took a 10% commission from the top two winners. Around January 17, 2018, Gao transferred the role of group owner of the WeChat gambling group to the defendant Zhang, and both Zhang and Huo began co-managing the group. During this period, the defendant Zhang frequently changed the WeChat group's name and his nickname, with the number of participants always remaining between 40 to 50 people. During the management of the WeChat gambling group by the defendants Zhang and Huo, Zhang was responsible for inviting gamblers to join the group, while Huo used multiple WeChat accounts to send links to the "Three Cards" gambling games in the group, organizing multiple gambling activities daily. Once participants clicked to confirm the game, the system automatically dealt each player three poker cards, and each gambler could place bets based on their cards, with bets ranging from 1 to 10 points, where 1 point equaled 2 yuan. Each gambling game had a maximum of 20 rounds. When Huo settled the gambling funds, he took a 10% commission from the top two winners (mandatory for winnings of 30 yuan or more, not for winnings below 30 yuan). While Zhang and Huo were managing the WeChat gambling group, they collected a total commission of 25,697.37 yuan. On March 13, 2018, police officers from the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of the city arrested defendant Zhang; on April 18, 2018, defendant Huo voluntarily surrendered to the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of the city.


Upon trial, it was found that on the morning of July 28, 2011, defendants Xiao and Chen, along with Wang A (at large), went to a certain town in a certain county to steal a motorcycle. At approximately 11:30 a.m. that day, Xiao and Wang took a Changhe minivan with license plate number E F××××× driven by Chen to the Chengdong Gas Station in the town. The three found a Haojue Suzuki 125K two-wheeled motorcycle parked by Hu in the residential yard of the oil company next to the gas station and subsequently stole the motorcycle. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain county's Price Bureau, the motorcycle was valued at 3,280 yuan. On January 5 and February 21, 2014, Xiao and Chen were respectively arrested by police from the Fancheng District Branch of the Xiangyang City Public Security Bureau. During the trial, defendants Xiao and Chen raised no objections to the above facts, which were further supported by evidence including the registration forms of criminal cases, police dispatch work records, arrest records, a list of seized items, vehicle information forms, physical evidence photos, household registration documents, the criminal judgment, release certificates, written testimonies from witnesses such as Wang, statements from victims such as Hu, appraisal opinions from a certain county's Price Certification Center, identification records, site identification transcripts, on-site photos, as well as confessions and defenses from defendants Xiao and Chen, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charged: Between July and August 2014, the defendant Yang, in collusion with others, organized over 20 gambling gatherings in places such as the clubhouse Mahjong room at the Dahua Xixi Residence in Wuchang Street, Yuhang District, and the former Taoyuan Mahjong room at the Zijin Port Business Building in Xihu District, using the game "Erba Gang" played with Mahjong tiles, from which they illegally profited over 120,000 yuan by taking a cut. During this period, the defendant Wang, who was in charge of the Dahua Xixi Residence clubhouse Mahjong room, knowingly provided the venue for gambling on 8 occasions. Additionally, the defendant Ran knowingly acted as a lookout on 5 occasions. The evidence for the charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; and transcripts of inspections and identifications, among others.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of March 30, 2014, defendants Zhou and Li, after drinking and having premeditated, had Zhou drive a certain location F××××× two-wheeled motorcycle from Time Travel KTV in a certain city, heading north along Xinhua Road to reach the intersection with Renmin Road, where they brushed against a certain location F××××× car driven by Zhuang. Later, Li drove the motorcycle away from the accident scene to the Suiyuan Teahouse section where they were apprehended by police. According to the Jiaxing Municipal Public Security Forensic Center identification: the blood of defendants Zhou and Li contained ethanol, with concentrations of 2.20mg/ml and 2.07mg/ml, respectively, both exceeding the standard of 0.8mg/ml for driving a motor vehicle under the influence. Further investigations revealed that neither Zhou nor Li had a qualification for driving motorcycles, and the certain location F××××× two-wheeled motorcycle they drove had not undergone safety technical inspection. During the trial, Zhou raised no objection to the aforementioned criminal facts, which were corroborated by witness testimony, accident scene materials, driving qualification verification information, vehicle details, blood sample collection registration forms, physical examination reports, apprehension records, traffic accident determination documents, prior record materials, identification proof, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that the defendant Zhu is an officer at the XX Department of XX Company in Chengdu, responsible for information-related work, and from 2006 to the end of December 2014, was in charge of certain XX recharge management tasks. Defendant Zhu utilized the convenience of their position to recharge XX, with defendant Tao responsible for external communications and the sale of recharged XX, while defendants Yang and Fan were responsible for selling the recharged XX. The four defendants sold each card, which they recharged 1,200 times a year, each worth 600 RMB, at prices ranging from 300 RMB to 360 RMB. After sales, Zhu received 200 RMB per card, Tao received 100 RMB, and Yang and Fan received between 30 to 60 RMB. At the end of 2012 to the beginning of 2013, Tao handed over 60 recharged XX cards from Zhu to Yang and Fan to be sold at a price of 330 RMB each. At the end of 2013 to the beginning of 2014, Yang and Fan collected 180 XX cards through charging a prepaid recharge fee of 360 RMB per card, then sent the cards to Zhu via Tao for recharging, and returned them to the purchasing public. At the end of 2014, Tao collected 44 XX cards by charging a prepaid recharge fee of 300 RMB per card, handed them over to Zhu for recharging, and returned them to the purchasing public. At the same year-end, after prior agreement with Zhu and liaison by Tao, Yang and Fan collected 220 XX cards by means of charging a prepaid recharge fee of 360 RMB per card, which were later seized by the police officers.


The defendants Xu and Zhou have no objections to the basic criminal facts and charges alleged by the public prosecution, agree to the use of a summary procedure, and have signed to this effect. They also have no objections during the court hearing. The facts and evidence found through the trial are consistent with the allegations made by the public prosecution.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges that the defendant Wang, due to suspecting that the victim Huang was deliberately making things difficult for his girlfriend at work, on October 16, 2013, at approximately 22:30, went to the entrance of a plaza on Bantian Street in a certain district with the defendant Peng. Upon seeing Huang come out of the supermarket, Wang had an argument with Huang which led to a scuffle. Peng, seeing this, also went forward to hit Huang, and together they injured Huang. Wang and Peng were subsequently apprehended at the scene. According to an assessment: Huang sustained minor injuries; both Wang and Peng sustained slight injuries. After the incident, the two defendants jointly compensated the victim with 6,000 RMB, and the victim expressed understanding towards both defendants. The prosecution presented corresponding evidence, arguing that defendants Wang and Peng disregarded national law, intentionally injured another person, causing minor injury, and their actions violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting crime x, recommending a sentence of imprisonment or control detention of less than 11 months for both defendants. Defendant Wang had no objections to the charges, evidence, and sentencing recommendation from the prosecution. His defense counsel presented the following defense opinions: 1. There were reasons behind this case; 2. After the incident, the defendant compensated the victim with 6,000 RMB and received understanding; 3. The social harm of this case is not significant; 4. The defendant had a good attitude of admitting guilt after capture and showed remorse; 5. The defendant is a first-time and occasional offender without a criminal record. In summary, the defense requests the court to impose a lenient sentence and grant probation to the defendant. Defendant Peng also had no objections to the charges, evidence, and sentencing recommendation from the prosecution. The facts of the charges above were also undisputed by defendants Wang and Peng during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence provided by the public security authorities including the arrest process, household registration proof, reconciliation agreement, letter of understanding, witness testimony from Leng, statement from the victim Huang, confessions and defenses of the defendants, assessment documents, scene investigation records, and photographs, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At approximately 5 a.m. on March 22, 2014, the defendants Wei and Mo sold a small bag containing 2.9 grams of methamphetamine ("crystal meth") to a drug buyer, Zhong, for 450 RMB on a certain road in the Chengzhong District of this city. After the drug transaction between defendants Wei and Mo and Zhong, they were immediately apprehended by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Mo and Wei during the court trial, and they are substantiated by the testimony of witness Zhong, identification records and photos, a list and photos of seized items, photos of the drug weighing, a drug identification report, a certificate of drug seizure, the account of the arrest process, previous conviction materials, household registration proof, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient for determination.


The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of March 28, 2016, defendants Chen, Wang, and "A" (handled in a separate case) conspired in advance to cheat victim Sun out of more than 10,000 RMB by signaling each other and feeding cards covertly to manipulate the outcome while playing mahjong in a game room at the Jindao Hotel in Cixi City, Zhejiang Province. On the evening of April 18 of the same year, Chen, Wang, and Chai (already sentenced) conspired in advance to cheat victim Sun again out of more than 6,000 RMB by using similar tactics during a mahjong game in Room 8902 at the Ao Jie Hotel game room in Zhaoting Town, Yuyao City. On April 18, 2016, Chen was arrested by police; on June 6, 2017, Wang was arrested by police. After the crime was discovered, Chen and Chai (already sentenced) compensated Sun with 20,000 RMB, and Sun forgave Chen and the others for their conduct. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence to the court.


The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of December 1, 2015, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Liang in room 320 of Yihe Apartment, Xinwei Town, a certain county, to consume the drug ketamine. On the same evening, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Liang in the same location to consume methamphetamine, and later harbored drug user Dai to consume methamphetamine in the room. In the early morning of December 2 of the same month, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Jiang in room 320 of Yihe Apartment, Xinwei Town, a certain county, to consume both ketamine and methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts have been acknowledged by the defendants He and Chen during the court hearing, and are substantiated by evidence including the case registration form, case filing decision, household registration certificate, account of the arrest, identification transcripts, list of evidence received, CDs, identification records and photos, inspection certificate and transcripts, seizure decisions and lists, on-site inspection records and pictures, explanatory notes, on-site testing reports, administrative penalty decisions, and testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Liang, Dai, and Zhang, among others, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On the afternoon of December 2, 2013, defendants Wang and Jiang, after prior discussion, stole one iPhone 4S belonging to Yan, one Haier laptop belonging to Yan, and one Zhongderui phone belonging to Shi from Dormitory 2434, on the 4th floor of Building 8, "Wansheng Holdings Group," located in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items is 5,198.95 yuan. 2. One evening in late September 2014, defendant Jiang, together with others, after prior discussion, stole one Wolong electric bicycle parked by Wu in the corridor of the dormitory building at Zhejiang Longxiang Knitting Technology Co., Ltd. in the Economic and Technological Development Zone, Paijiang, a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen vehicle is 590 yuan. On October 13, 2014, Jiang was apprehended by the Qixian Police Station of the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of a certain city for suspected drug use. During questioning, Jiang voluntarily confessed to the main facts which the public security organs had not yet discovered. Furthermore, after being captured by the public security organs, defendant Wang truthfully confessed to the main facts mentioned above. During the court hearing, Wang and Jiang raised no objections to the facts above. The case is supported by evidence such as photographs of the crime scene, purchase receipts for the involved vehicle, criminal rulings No. 47 (2011), No. 445 (2013), and No. 368 (2014) from Shaoyue Criminal Court, apprehension records and situation reports issued by the public security officers of a certain city and the Public Security Bureau of Feidong County in a certain province, statements from Yan, Shi, and Wu, the price appraisal conclusion Shaomoumojiangzi No. 0551 (2014), and the identification records of Wang and Jiang, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of April 1, 2014, the defendants Wen, Luo, and Jin went to the front of the shop at 588-Y07 Wenkang Road, Bailu Market, Yushan Town, Kunshan City, and stole one blue Zongshen brand three-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 5005 RMB) and several bags of bean sprouts parked there by the victim, Zhang. After being apprehended, defendants Wen, Luo, and Jin truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendant Wen assisted the public security organs in capturing other criminal suspects.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Nantong City charges that: On the afternoon of December 12, 2015, defendants Li and Huang conspired to commit theft and went to South Street in a certain district of this city to look for a target. At around 7 p.m. that night, defendants Li and Huang, at the north gate of Wenfeng World in a certain district of this city, used the method of Li stealing and Huang keeping watch to opportunistically steal a Bifer BF-T12 model phone from the right pocket of the victim, Ding. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 20 RMB. That evening, defendants Li and Huang were arrested and brought to justice by the public security authorities. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Huang truthfully confessed to their crimes. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Huang during the trial, and are corroborated by the evidence presented by the public prosecutor, including the confessions of defendants Li and Huang during the investigation stage, the statement of the victim Ding, the testimonies of witnesses Sun and Yang, the records and photos of the defendants Li and Huang identifying the crime scene, the seizure decision and seizure record by the public security authorities, the seizure list and the list of returned items, the price certification opinion issued by the Nantong City Price Certification Center regarding the phone, the process of bringing Li and Huang to justice issued by the public security authorities, the household registration materials of defendants Li and Huang, the (2006) Xiang Criminal First Instance No. 330 Criminal Judgment of the Xiangshan District People's Court of a certain city, the release certificate from a prison in a certain city of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, the (2006) Star Criminal First Instance No. 103 Criminal Judgment of the Qixing District People's Court of a certain city, and the release certificate from a prison in a certain city of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, among others. All the aforementioned evidence was verified and confirmed as having probative value during the court trial, and this court accepts it as valid.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that at around 23:30 on November 2, 2019, defendants Cui and Yang had a dispute with bar staff over trivial matters at a bar on Wenzhou Pedestrian Street in Yicheng District, Zhumadian City. During the handling of the situation by the police, Cui, Yang, and others refused to cooperate and verbally abused, pulled, and kicked the officers, resulting in minor injuries (slight abrasions) to Officer Jia and others. Subsequently, the police forcibly brought Cui and Yang to the public security bureau for processing. After the incident, the officers performing their duties expressed understanding towards Cui and Yang. It was also found that after the incident, other individuals involved had been administratively punished by the public security bureau. After being brought to the case, defendants Cui and Yang truthfully confessed to the facts of obstructing police officers from executing their duties through violent means. These facts were not disputed by defendants Cui and Yang during the trial and were substantiated by witness testimonies, audio-visual materials, documentary evidence, and other evidence, which is sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a Hui area accused that at around 1:00 a.m. on September 11, 2015, the defendant Xu, due to the loss of his motorcycle, proposed to the defendants Duan, Wei, and Wang (under sixteen years old), and Xi (identity unknown) to steal a motorcycle, which they agreed to. The defendants Xu and others found a red and white "Hailing" brand high-handlebar racing motorcycle in the parking shed of a hospital in a certain county. Xu, along with Wang and Xi, lifted the locked motorcycle out of the shed, while Duan and Wei kept watch. Xu, Wang, and Xi moved the motorcycle near a community next to the hospital through the hospital's fence. Xu then called defendants Wei and Duan to come to the vicinity of the community. After breaking the lock of the motorcycle with tools, Duan connected the wires of the motorcycle, and Xu rode it away. Later, while Xu was riding the motorcycle in a township, he was spotted by the owner, who reported it to the police. After the case was solved, the stolen motorcycle was returned to the victim. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen motorcycle was 5,850 yuan. Additionally, after the incident, defendants Xu and Wei voluntarily surrendered to the authorities.


Upon trial, it was found that Huang B (already sentenced) and the victim, Yang, had several disputes due to street vending. On June 5, 2013, at about 1 p.m., Huang B called Huang A (handled in another case) and defendants Jiang and Li, among others, to the road in front of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China on Renmin Middle Road, Xingning District, in a certain city. They assaulted Yang with beer bottles, resulting in injuries to Yang's body and head. Forensic identification determined the degree of physical injury to the victim Yang as serious. Defendant Li surrendered to the public security authorities on October 8, 2013, and defendant Jiang was arrested by the police on September 2. After the incident, Huang B, Huang A, and defendants Jiang and Li reached a settlement agreement with the victim Yang, compensating Yang a total of 120,000 yuan for various economic losses, of which Huang B compensated 85,000 yuan, Huang A compensated 10,000 yuan, defendant Li compensated 11,000 yuan, and defendant Jiang compensated 14,000 yuan. The families of Huang B, Huang A, and defendants Jiang and Li have paid the compensation, and the victim Yang has forgiven them, requesting the court to be lenient in sentencing. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jiang and Li during the trial, and are confirmed by the victim's statement, witness testimonies, forensic medical injury identification report, forensic medical injury appraisal report, seizure list, account of the case, records and photos of crime scene identification, household registration certificates, mediation agreement, receipts and letters of forgiveness, and the defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial and investigation, it was found that at approximately 16:30 on June 2, 2017, the defendant Liu was driving a school bus with the license plate Hubei B××××× from a certain district's kindergarten located at the Oriental Decoration City in Huangshi City towards Daqian Road, Huangshi City. When reaching the section of Daqian Road near Sanjiang Gonghecheng, the vehicle was stopped for inspection by on-duty police officers. Upon inspection, the officers discovered that the school bus driven by Liu was approved to carry 26 passengers, but was actually carrying 41 passengers, which exceeded the approved number by more than 50%. The defendant Huang is the legal representative of the kindergarten in that district. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings. This is corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Huang, Li, Hu, Zhang, and others, as well as evidence from the process of how the case was brought to court, household registration certificates, driver information inquiry results, the kindergarten's school bus safety responsibility document, school bus route list, the confessions of defendants Liu and Huang, and video surveillance footage and screenshots of the route taken by the school bus with license plate Hubei B×××××. The evidence is reliable, sufficient, and conclusive.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Yuecheng City charges that at around 2 a.m. on May 2, 2013, the defendants Cai and Zhu, after prior collusion, followed the victim Nong into the alley next to a restaurant on Victory West Road in a certain district of the city. Defendant Cai took the opportunity when the victim Nong was alone to grab the bag hanging on Nong's shoulder. The victim Nong held on to the bag with great effort. Seeing the situation, defendant Zhu stepped forward to assist. During the struggle for the bag, the strap broke, causing the victim to fall to the ground and drop a Dika cellphone. Defendant Cai then took the bag and picked up the cellphone, and escaped from the scene together with defendant Zhu. The two defendants obtained over 920 RMB, a Dika cellphone valued at 390 RMB, and a Samsung cellphone valued at 123 RMB. Afterwards, defendant Cai received over 520 RMB and the Dika cellphone; defendant Zhu received over 400 RMB and the Samsung cellphone. At around 7 p.m. on May 23, 2013, defendant Cai was arrested by public security at the Shuangjigong restaurant on Fushou West Road in a certain district of the city; at around 10 p.m. the same day, defendant Zhu was arrested by public security at the Yueyue Internet Cafe on Choujiang Street, Yiwu City, in a certain province. After the incident, the stolen Dika cellphone was recovered and returned to the victim. Defendants Cai and Zhu compensated the victim Nong 500 RMB and 700 RMB respectively. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Cai and Zhu during the court trial, and were substantiated by the victim Nong's statement, price appraisal conclusion, identification record and on-site photos, list of seized and returned items, statement of circumstances, description of the arrest process, receipts, summary of personnel information, proof of household registration, and other evidence, sufficient to reach a determination.


According to the indictment by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city, on the evening of January 27, 2016, at about 8 PM, the defendant Liao, in collaboration with the defendant Tan, committed theft at the night market on Gaofeng Road in the said district of the city. Defendant Tan acted as a lookout while defendant Liao executed the theft, stealing a DOOV T90 mobile phone from the right pocket of victim Mao Mouzhen's coat. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen mobile phone was valued at 423 RMB.

Furthermore, it was found that on the evening of January 27, 2016, plainclothes police officers were conducting undercover surveillance on Chaoyang Road in the said district. At around 8 PM that evening, the police observed two men stealing someone else's property and fleeing the scene at the night market on Gaofeng Road. The police then proceeded to apprehend them. Subsequently, the police apprehended the two individuals near the entrance of Xinghe Decheng Times. Upon investigation, one of the men was identified as Liao and the other as Tan. The stolen DOOV T90 mobile phone was recovered from Liao’s possession. On January 28, 2016, the police returned the confiscated stolen phone to the victim.

The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liao and Tan during the court proceedings. The case is supported by the following evidence: registration form of the case, decision to file the case, statement by victim Mao Mouzhen, process of apprehension, list of items seized, list of items returned, identification record and photographs of the crime scene, price appraisal report, notice of appraisal opinion, household registration certificate, and confessions and defenses of the defendants Liao and Tan, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that at around 19:00 on January 31, 2013, the defendants Liu and Lu, along with Dong B, Qin B (both already sentenced), and others, engaged in gambling using the method of "catching a single six" at the store of a fellow villager Lu A. That evening, the victims Liao and Wei also participated in the gambling. During this time, Dong B accused Liao of cheating and demanded that Liao return the money he had lost, slapping Liao in the face. Subsequently, Qin B, Liu, Lu, and others also demanded that Liao return the money due to their losses, and they punched and kicked Liao and Wei. Later, Liao returned 1,500 yuan to Dong B and 600 yuan to Lu. Dong B and others then threatened Liao with further assault if he did not bring another 10,000 yuan to reimburse them. Consequently, Wei called his wife to deliver 10,000 yuan to Qin B, after which they were able to leave. On April 11, 2014, Liu was apprehended by the police. On May 13, 2014, Lu voluntarily turned himself in to the police. It was also found that the defendants Liu and Lu had obtained the forgiveness of the victims Liao A and Wei A. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants and their defense lawyers during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as the case registration form, statements of victims Liao and Wei, testimonies of witnesses Dong A and Qin A, on-site inspection, identification records, site location maps, site photos, site identification photos, confessions of defendants Liu, Lu, and co-defendants Dong B and Qin B, apprehension process, household registration certificates, explanatory materials, and the criminal judgment document (2013) Jiang Criminal First Instance No. 354. Liu's defense counsel proposed that there were reasons behind the incident, that the victims’ forgiveness had been obtained, that Liu had a good attitude towards admitting guilt, and that he was willing to pay a fine, recommending that the court apply probation to Liu.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that from the end of August 2012 to September 7 of the same year, the defendants Hu and Yang, together with Hong (already sentenced) and others, for the purpose of profit-making, gathered at the Caidiexuan Café, Zunpin Café, Congress KTV in Cixi City, organized Jin, Su, Xu, Zheng, and others to gamble in the form of "Niuhonghong," thereby illegally profiting over 20,000 RMB. On July 31, 2013, defendant Hu turned himself in to the Gutang Police Station of Cixi Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Yang truthfully confessed to the above-mentioned criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Yang during the trial and are corroborated by the confession of co-defendant Hong, the testimonies of witnesses Jin, Su, Xu, and Zheng, identification records and photographs, the criminal judgment of the co-defendant, details of the appearance and arrest, and the identification documents of defendants Hu and Yang, which are sufficient to establish.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that in early March 2020, "San Jiao Jiao" (handled in a separate case) invited Gong to help sell methamphetamine while using drugs with him, promising that Gong could consume methamphetamine with her, and Gong agreed. Subsequently, Gong contacted Chen, asking Chen to help find buyers for methamphetamine, and promised Chen could use methamphetamine for free. Despite knowing Gong was trafficking drugs, Chen agreed to Gong's request. On a day before the Qingming Festival in 2020, a man nicknamed "Bo Mo" contacted Chen by phone to purchase methamphetamine. Chen and Gong arranged to meet "Bo Mo" near a certain location in a town in Baojing County, where "Bo Mo" gave Gong 100 yuan in exchange for a small packet of methamphetamine. On March 9, 2020, Zhou contacted Chen by phone to purchase drugs. Chen introduced Zhou's WeChat to Gong, and subsequently, between March 2020 and April 2020, Zhou contacted Gong through WeChat and purchased methamphetamine 11 times, paying more than 3,000 yuan.


The court investigation found: Prior to the incident, defendants Ju and Guo agreed to go to a certain place to commit theft. Therefore, on October 3, 2013, at approximately 1 p.m., defendant Ju and Guo separately took bus rides from certain locations in a certain city and province to meet in front of Mingzhu Building in a certain city. After planning, they targeted a single woman, Xing Moujia, who was carrying a backpack, in the underground mall on Shangxiu Street. Ju and Guo approached and bumped into Xing Moujia, allowing Ju the opportunity to steal a Xiaomi Redmi phone from her backpack. The victim later called the police.

Defendant Ju handed the phone to defendant Guo at the entrance of Hualian Shopping Mall, where Guo was subsequently apprehended by the police. The stolen phone was seized and returned to the owner. The appraisal valued the phone at 1,128 RMB. Additionally, it was found that defendant Ju turned himself in to the public security organs voluntarily, under the persuasion of relatives, on October 8, 2013.

The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ju and Guo during the court hearing. They were substantiated by their statements to the police, the victim Xing Moujia's statement, the police's list of seized and returned items, the price verification report, the identification record, the criminal judgment and release certificate, the auditory evoked potential test report and diagnosis certificate from the city's People's Hospital, the account statement, basic resident information, and other evidence, which is sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that on April 12, 2012, at around 1 PM, defendants Zhao, Zheng, Yu, and Ma received a phone call from Li A (already sentenced) and followed Xu XX, Li A, Liu XX, Jiang XX, Shi XX, Zhu XX, He XX, Dou XX, Chang XX, Tian XX, Huo XX, and Zhang A (all already sentenced) to the high store front of Shih XX, a merchant in the fourth phase of the Lotus Market, to "maintain the scene" for Shih XX, in an attempt to resolve a dispute between Shih XX and Qiu XX of the neighboring shop. During the confrontation between the parties, a fight broke out between the women Shih XX, Wei XX, Wang XX, and Kang No. 2, Meng XX from Qiu XX's shop. Following this, Li B, Zhang B, Gao XX, and others, who came to find Qiu XX, had a verbal altercation with Xu XX, Li A, Jiang XX, and others, which escalated into a brawl. During the brawl, Tian XX threw the victim Li B to the ground, and Li A struck Li B on the head with a wooden stick, resulting in Li B's death due to severe cranial brain injury.


After trial, it was found that at around 3:00 PM on April 17, 2014, the defendant Chen, without obtaining a motor vehicle driver's license, drove a small ordinary passenger car with the license plate Lu G××××× under the influence of alcohol, traveling west to east along Xueguan Road in a certain city until reaching a road section in a township village. At this point, the car collided with a small sedan, license plate Lu B×××××, driven by Yu. After the accident, in order to evade legal consequences, the defendant Liu, also under the influence of alcohol, drove the small ordinary passenger car with the license plate Lu G×××××, assisting the defendant Chen in fleeing. According to the forensic evaluation, the ethanol content detected in the venous blood of defendant Chen was 179.9mg/100ml, and the ethanol content detected in the venous blood of defendant Liu was 141.5mg/100ml. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the two defendants during the court hearing and were corroborated by documentary evidence, including statements concerning the capture of the criminal suspects, the criminal judgment, the administrative penalty decision by the Public Security Bureau of the city, the road traffic accident identification report, household registration certificates, and witness testimony from Yu, among other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused: 1. On the midnight of May 31, 2017, defendants Xiao and Zhou, in collaboration with Tan (already sentenced), went to the ground floor garage at No. 5, Building 2, Lane 418, Zhou East Road, a town in this district, which is the residence of victim Zhu 1, father of Zhu A, to whom they were pressing for debt repayment. They used spray paint to damage the stainless steel security windows and aluminum doors and windows of the garage. They then proceeded to another village in the town, at address XXX, residence of victim Zhu B, sister of Zhu A, using spray paint to deface the exterior walls of Zhu B's residence. An appraisal determined that the damage to the property was valued at 2,907 RMB and 555 RMB respectively. 2. In the early morning of June 2, 2017, defendants Xiao and Zhou, again collaborating with Tan, went to the same garage of victim Zhu 1 for the purpose of pressing Zhu A for debt repayment and used bricks to smash the doors and window glass of the garage. The damage was appraised at 519 RMB. On June 2, 2017, defendant Xiao was summoned by the public security organs but only truthfully confessed to the above facts during the review and prosecution phase. On September 28, 2017, defendant Zhou was apprehended by local police authorities in a city of a certain province and confessed truthfully to the above facts upon arrival. The family of co-defendant Tan has made economic compensation for the above-mentioned losses to the victims. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xiao and Zhou during the trial, and were substantiated by the verified statements of victims Zhu 1, Zhu B, and Fu, the testimonies of witnesses Zheng, Tang, and Mei, the confession and identification record of co-defendant Tan, the testimony and identification record of witness Zhang, the pricing appraisal report by the Price Appraisal Center of Pudong New Area, Shanghai, related receipts and loan contracts, details of the case occurrence and apprehension, related criminal judgment documents, defendants Xiao and Zhou's confessions after arriving at the case, and household registration information, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found: 1. On an afternoon around October 28, 2013, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to "Yan Zi Wu" clothing store on the main street of a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Li, Yang, Ma, Lin, Fang, and others to gamble using the "Tong Zi Gong" method, taking over 1500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 2. On a night around November 3 of the same year, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 2-2, Gu Jia Zha Ji, Gangzhong Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Shen, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the "Tong Zi Gong" method, taking over 1000 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 3. On an afternoon around November 7 of the same month, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 1, Bei Xu Jia Wan, Shantang Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the "Tong Zi Gong" method, taking over 3500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 4. On an afternoon around November 11 of the same month, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 2, Gao Jia Zha Ji, Shantang Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the "Tong Zi Gong" method, taking over 1500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. It was further found that defendants Zhu, Xu, and Zhang turned themselves in to the Dushangang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on January 1, January 3, and January 6, 2014, respectively. The aforementioned criminal facts were undisputed by defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang during the court trial. Furthermore, there is sufficient evidence such as a case registration form, witness testimony, previous criminal judgments, administrative penalty decisions by public security, proof of illegal and criminal experience inquiry, processing of arrival, and identity verification to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: In October 2013, Huai'an City Dingshun Pipeline Co., Ltd. was conducting pipe jacking operations at a construction site in a certain area and nearby a certain town. On October 10, 2013, around 5 pm, after construction, the company left a flow channel reamer used for drilling holes under an advertisement board at the northwest corner of the site without arranging for someone to watch over it. At around 7 pm that evening, the defendants Gao and Ding, passing by, discovered the reamer and lifted it onto Ding's flatbed cart, covering it with a plastic woven bag. The two defendants later sold the reamer for 160 yuan, splitting the proceeds. According to a price appraisal, the stolen item was valued at 9,200 yuan. After the incident, the stolen item was recovered. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Gao and Ding during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of Wang, an employee of the victimized unit, along with the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Yang, Han, Wang Yi, Wang Bing, Li, identification records and photos, lists of seized and returned items, photos of the stolen item, the price appraisal report, an account of the incident, and explanations of the defendants' apprehension, which are sufficient to be believed.


The prosecution alleges: At the end of 2013, China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., Ltd. undertook the Dongzaolu Road project in a certain town of a district in a city. In the early morning of March 7, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Yu, under the arrangement of others, drove two twin-axle construction trucks with the license plates xxx from a certain place to the Dongzaolu Road construction site in a certain town of a district in a city, and parked the trucks on the construction road until 10:30 a.m., causing the construction party to be unable to work for three and a half hours. It was identified that the direct economic loss to the construction party was 24,775 yuan. Further investigation revealed that both defendants were drivers of transportation vehicles for the Dongzaolu Road project site in a certain town of a district in a city. On the day of the incident, to prevent other vehicles from entering the project site for transportation, they parked their vehicles on the construction road, resulting in the inability of the project to proceed normally. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial and were substantiated by their household registration certificates and confessions, the report materials from China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., Ltd., the testimonies of witnesses Lu xx, Chang xx, Meng xx, He xx, Wei xx, Sang xx, Wang xx, He xx, Tang xx, Qiang xx, Zhang xx, Ming xx, Zhang xx, Yang xx, Chen xx, Wang xx, and Wang xx, identification records, photos of the vehicles used in the crime, an accounting audit report, and the arrest documentation provided by the public security authority, which are sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of the Northern District of a certain city charges that on December 11, 2015, at approximately 21:00, the defendants Zhu and Wu, after conspiring to commit theft, followed Wei to the night market on Caishi Second Road in the Northern District of a certain city. Zhu used tweezers to remove a white Xiaomi brand Redmi Note mobile phone (valued at 200 RMB) from the right pocket of Wei's jacket and handed it to Wu. The two were apprehended by public security officers while fleeing the scene. The stolen item was recovered and returned to the victim, Wei. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence in court: 1. Documentary evidence: The case registration form, a report on the case resolution, a report on the arrest, household registration proof, criminal judgment, release certificate, seizure list, return list, etc.; 2. Statement of the victim Wei; 3. Testimonies of witnesses including Zhou; 4. Confessions and defense statements of the defendants Zhu and Wu; 5. Expert opinion: Valuation assessment report of the items involved from a certain province; 6. Records of examination, inspection, identification, and investigative experiments: Identification records, etc.


Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained:

1. At 4:37 a.m. on January 2, 2015, the defendants Liang and He went to the parking lot on the first floor of a rental building at a certain lane in Demingli, a certain village, a certain bay, a certain district, a certain city. They used tools such as wrenches and wire cutters to steal a XiDeSheng Leopard Model 2 xd3 electric bicycle worth RMB 2,232 belonging to the victim Yu, and a XiDeSheng 26-inch 2014 Model Zhuri 700 mountain bike worth RMB 1,947 belonging to the victim Han.

2. At around 4 a.m. on the 4th of the same month, the defendants Liang and He, along with another male, used similar methods at the same location to steal an AIMA 14-inch Baby Model 3 electric bicycle worth RMB 2,016 belonging to the victim Chen, and a XiDeSheng 26-inch 2015 Model Zhuri 700 mountain bike worth RMB 2,050 belonging to the victim Han.

On the 6th of the same month, the defendants Liang and He were caught by police officers while preparing to commit theft in a certain village in a certain district, a certain city, and a batch of tools, including wire cutters, were confiscated.

The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liang and He during the hearing. Evidence submitted by the public prosecution agency, verified in court, included: a certificate from the Dubu Police Station of the Yangshan County Public Security Bureau, records of the arrest process, sales (warranty) registration forms for the bicycles, sales invoices for the electric bikes, search records, seizure records, a list of seized items and photos of said items, an explanation of the image production, statements from the victims Han, Yu, and Chen, screenshots from videos depicting the thefts by Liang, He, and others, a property price appraisal report from the Price Certification Center of a certain district in a certain city, and the confessions and identification records of the defendants Liang and He, all proving these facts conclusively.


Upon trial, it was found: In May and June 2014, at the request of the defendant Zhang, Qi, the defendant Qi assisted Zhang, Qi in purchasing a "fake base station" device. On June 9 of the same year, after Qi helped Zhang, Qi obtain the "fake base station" equipment, the device was used to illegally occupy the frequency utilized by a country's mobile communications, forcibly sending messages to unspecified mobile users of certain country's mobile communication companies. The next day, Qi helped Zhang, Qi edit two text messages, which Zhang, Qi then used the "fake base station" device to send, totaling more than 300,000 messages. According to assessments, between June 9 and 16, the defendants Zhang, Qi and Qi caused disruptions to the communications of over ten thousand users, with outages lasting less than an hour, by utilizing the "fake base station." At around 9 PM on June 16, 2014, police discovered a suspicious vehicle near the Youth Sunshine Hotel on Liu Ong West Road in a town in a certain city and apprehended the suspicious defendant Zhang, Qi in the vehicle. After questioning, the defendant Zhang, Qi voluntarily confessed to the criminal acts. The following day, Zhang, Qi assisted police in apprehending the defendant Qi. The facts aforementioned were uncontested by Zhang, Qi and Qi during the court hearing, and are sufficiently corroborated by evidence such as the "fake base station" equipment (including one converter, one battery, one SMS transmitter, one mobile phone, one antenna, and one laptop), a list of seized items, photographs, account transaction information, logistics receipts, the arrest account, statements, search records, electronic evidence examination reports, test reports, criminal judgment documents, compulsory detoxification decision documents, labor reeducation decision certificates, labor reeducation release documents, criminal record verification, and household registration certificates.


The People's Procuratorate of Chengzhong District, a certain city, charges: On December 16, 2017, at approximately 20:00, the defendants Yang and Wei, after premeditating, went to the jewelry counter on the first floor of the Sanfu Mall on Jiefang South Road in Chengzhong District of a certain city. Wei acted as the lookout, while Yang stole an Apple 7 Plus mobile phone worth 5600 RMB from the outer coat pocket of the victim, Zhu. Subsequently, Wei sold the stolen phone for 2300 RMB and shared 1200 RMB with Yang. On December 19, 2017, and January 31, 2018, respectively, Yang and Wei were apprehended by the public security organ. The actions of the defendants Yang and Wei constitute the crime of theft, and this court is requested to punish them according to the law. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Yang and Wei during the court trial process, and are confirmed by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, the statement of the victim Zhu, photos and records of identification, the price appraisal conclusion, the accounts of the arrest, the criminal record, and the confessions of defendants Yang and Wei. These are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges:

1. On the evening of September 18, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a children's clothing store next to a certain kindergarten in a certain city and stole a dark maroon Xinlei brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,516 belonging to victim Jiang.

2. At noon on September 19, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, in collusion with others and after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a certain restaurant in a certain city and stole a champagne-colored Xinri brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,257 belonging to victim Hou.

3. On the afternoon of September 30, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a clothing store under Building 21 of a certain new town in a certain city and stole a black Yongyuan brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,496 belonging to victim Li.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused defendants Wang and Sun of being unemployed individuals. The two rented an apartment at Unit 3, Room 301, Building 11, Fuhui Garden Community, Fushan District, Yantai City. Between May and August 17, 2016, for profit, the two harbored Li1 and Li2 for prostitution in the apartment. Defendant Wang used QQ to post solicitation information, recruiting and introducing clients for Li1 and Li2. Defendants Wang and Sun received over 7,000 RMB in illicit proceeds from the prostitution fees. On the afternoon of August 17, 2016, while defendants Wang and Sun were harboring Li1 and Li2 for prostitution in the apartment, they were caught on the spot by policemen from the Fushan Branch of Yantai City Public Security Bureau. At the same time, the clients Lin and Chen were also apprehended, and 600 RMB in prostitution fees were confiscated. The prosecuting authority provided relevant evidence to substantiate the alleged criminal facts.


Upon trial, it was found that around 19:00 on March 24, 2016, with funds provided by the defendant Chen, the defendant Zhang purchased the drug "Magu" and registered room 202 at the "Haoyuan Hotel" on Sports Road, Xiannüshan Subdistrict Office, in a certain city. The two defendants prepared drug paraphernalia together in that room and accommodated Xiong, Wang, and Pan to consume drugs, whereupon they were apprehended by the police officers. According to the identification, the urine of defendants Zhang, Chen, as well as Xiong, Wang, and Pan tested positive for methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Pan, Xiong, Wang, and Li, along with inspection records, seizure lists, on-site photos, identification memos and photos, drug testing reports, on-site testing reports, urine sample extraction records, urine test board photos, administrative penalty decisions, defendants' basic information, and the synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogation, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.


The prosecution alleges: On July 22, 2014, at approximately 1 p.m., the defendant Mao carried heroin, and the defendant Liao drove a motorcycle to transport Mao from a city in a certain province to a specific village in a town in Zengcheng City. When conducting a drug transaction with Ruan M., they were caught by the police on the spot. The police seized a package of suspected drugs (after testing, heroin was detected, with a net weight of 0.29 grams) and 200 RMB in cash, suspected to be drug money.


The Third District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on May 3, 2014, at around 12:30 AM, the defendants Liu and Huang, along with Xie A (handled in a separate case), used a pre-prepared knife in the greenbelt section near the entrance of the Jinlei Industrial Park on Keyuan Avenue, in a certain town's industrial area, to rob the victims Lu and Yang. They seized one white Vivo BBK phone (valued at 1200 yuan) and 30 yuan, and then fled the scene. At around 1 AM on the same day, police arrested Xie A, Liu, and Huang near the greenbelt outside the wall of the Jinlei Industrial Park in a certain town. After the case was solved, all stolen money and property were returned to the victims. To support the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Xie and Li, statements and identification of stolen goods by the victims Lu and Yang, on-site investigation and inspection records, experimental investigation records, search records, one folding knife, the appraisal report of the property's value, case documentation, permanent resident information, lists of seized and returned items, a video disc of the interrogation and on-site identification, along with the defendants Liu and Huang's confessions, recognition records, and photos of the identification; it thus believes that the defendants Liu and Huang conspired to use a knife to forcibly seize the property of others at the scene, which violates the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Given the defendants Liu and Huang's good attitude in confessing and the return of the stolen money and property to the victims, a mitigated punishment is legally permissible. It is recommended that defendants Liu and Huang be sentenced to three to five years of fixed-term imprisonment and fined. This court is requested to impose a sentence according to the law. In court, the defendants Liu and Huang raised no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations put forward by the prosecution and did not provide any defense. Upon examination, it was found that the prosecution’s charges of x crime against the defendants Liu and Huang were factually clear and the evidence was true and sufficient, which this court confirms.