The People's Procuratorate of the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain area charged that on July 9 and 10, 2014, the defendant Xiao, either alone or in collaboration with the defendant Zhang, stole two electric bicycles in the territory of a certain area. Xiao's amount involved in the case was 5,481 RMB, and Zhang's was 3,115 RMB. The details are as follows: 1. On July 9, 2014, the defendant Xiao stole a Jinchi brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Sun from in front of the Golden Lily Hotel on Mingyuan Road in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain area. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,366 RMB. 2. On July 10, 2014, the defendant Xiao and Zhang stole a Lima brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Li B from in front of the Project Department of Phase III of Greenland Century City on Fudi Road, Ecological New City of a certain area. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 3,115 RMB. It was further found that on the afternoon of July 10, 2014, the Fucheng Road Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain area received a report from Li A, who stated that their Lima brand electric scooter had been stolen. Through investigation, Xiao was arrested and brought to justice on the afternoon of July 11, 2014. Based on Xiao's confession, the New City Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain area listed Zhang as an online wanted person. Zhang was arrested and brought to justice on July 15, 2014. After being brought to justice, the defendants Xiao and Zhang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft crimes. The family of the defendant Xiao has compensated the victim Sun for their losses. The public security authorities have recovered the Lima brand electric bicycle and returned it to the victim Li. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the statements of the victims Sun and Li, the testimony record of the witness Yan who was not present in court, photographs identifying the theft locations, the list of seized items, the list of returned items, the price appraisal conclusion certificate, and the case-solving report, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city indicted: In the early morning of May 23, 2016, defendant Tao discovered a black briefcase on the back seat of a black Hyundai car parked by victim Gan in the underground garage of Anzhen Street, a certain district of a certain city. Tao then contacted defendant Chen and conspired to steal the briefcase. Chen later stole the briefcase, which contained over 2270 yuan in cash (RMB, hereinafter the same). On the evening of May 23, 2016, defendant Tao entered a black Honda car parked by victim Zhang in the underground garage of Anzhen Street in a certain district of a certain city by opening the car door and searched for valuables but did not succeed in stealing anything. On May 25, 2016, the public security authorities arrested defendants Tao and Chen. After being brought to justice, both defendants Tao and Chen truthfully confessed to their acts of theft. After the case was solved, victim Gan received 2260 yuan in compensation and expressed forgiveness towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tao and Chen during the court hearing, and were substantiated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution and examined and validated in court, including the "Process of Solving the Criminal Case," "Record of Seizure of Stolen Property," "Seizure Decision," "Seizure Inventory," "List of Returned Items and Documents" issued by Anzhen Police Station, Xishan Branch, Public Security Bureau of a certain city, criminal photography photos, statements by victims Gan and Zhang, call records, "Letter of Forgiveness" by victim Gan, confessions, identification records, and identification photos from defendants Tao and Chen, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shaoxing City accuses that at around 8:54 on September 24, 2015, police officers Shao from the Lizhu Police Station of a certain district in Shaoxing City went to "NansXuan Knitting Factory" in a village in a certain town of Shaoxing City to handle a police incident and lawfully summoned the defendant Liu, who was suspected of assaulting another person. Subsequently, the defendants Liu and Ma (the husband of Liu) resisted by punching and kicking, causing injuries to police officer Shao and auxiliary officers He A, Zhang, Xu, and Jin. Furthermore, it was found that after being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Ma both truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. There was no objection from defendants Liu and Ma during the trial, and the facts are corroborated by evidence including photos of injuries, shoe sole photos, case information of the police report, work ID, certificates, outpatient medical records, ultrasound examination report, CT report, DR diagnosis report, arrest process, testimonies of Hu, Zeng, He B, Wang, and statements from Shao, He A, Zhang, Xu, and Jin, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


Upon examination, it was found that around 14:00 on June 19, 2018, the defendants Wang and Pan, at Wang's residence located at Room 402, Unit 4, Building 8, Siheyuan Community, Wunan Town, a certain district, a certain city, sold a small packet of heroin weighing 0.08 grams to Shi. Around 20:30 on the same day, the two defendants were caught red-handed by public security personnel while again selling heroin to Shi at Wang's home. Subsequently, investigators discovered three small packets of heroin on the bed in Wang's bedroom, with a total net weight of 0.44 grams, drug money amounting to 200 yuan, and a "Huawei" mobile phone. A small packet of heroin weighing 0.07 grams, drug money of 400 yuan, and an "OPPO" mobile phone were found in a handbag carried by the defendant Pan. Six small packets of heroin, with a net weight of 0.18 grams, were found in Shi's possession. These facts are substantiated by the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the on-site inspection records and photos, witness testimonies, the identification records, the seizure list and photos, the weighing records, the inspection and appraisal report, call records, the drug handover receipt, and the confessions of the defendants, which were presented in court by the prosecution and verified to be true.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on October 25, 2018, at No. 29, Huangyanghe Street, Liangzhou District, in a certain city, the defendant Zhang sold five woven bags of poppy husks, which the defendant Wang had him sell, to Hou for 23,400 yuan. During the transaction, as pre-agreed, Hou paid a total of 25,400 yuan as drug money and an introduction fee. After receiving the drug money, Zhang refunded 400 yuan to Hou under the pretense of being an oil fee for transporting the poppy husks. Subsequently, Zhang paid Wang 20,400 yuan for the drug money. That night, when Hou was transporting the poppy husks to the vicinity of an intersection in a certain district of the city, he was caught onsite by the police, with a net weight of 22.9982 kilograms. Later that night, the defendants Zhang and Wang were arrested by the public security authorities. According to an appraisal by the Gansu Provincial Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center: opium alkaloids codeine, morphine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine were detected in all five samples of suspected poppy husks submitted for examination. The aforementioned facts are corroborated by evidence presented in court by the prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, witness testimonies, identification records, lists and photographs of seized items, weighing records, inspection and appraisal reports, the drug transfer receipt, and confessions from the defendants. All evidence has been verified as authentic through cross-examination.


The prosecution agency charged that from January 7 to 9, 2015, the defendants Sun and Zhang successively stole five times from Watsons Supermarket, Starbucks Coffee, Likun Pharmacy, Finidi's Counter, and Sketch Men's Wear Counter at Kaihong Plaza, Donggang Street, a certain district. They stole four pairs of Watsons brand women's leggings and pantyhose (worth RMB 130), one 8oz Peach Blossom To-go Cup (worth RMB 95), one box of Beijing Tong Ren Tang Ejiao (worth RMB 429), three pieces of women's underwear (worth RMB 1077), as well as one sweatshirt and one knitted pullover (worth a total of RMB 2376), with the total value of the stolen property amounting to RMB 4107. On January 9, 2015, the defendants Sun and Zhang were apprehended by the police. After the incident, the defendants Sun and Zhang compensated the victims for all their losses. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Zhang during the court proceedings. Additionally, there are testimonies from witnesses Wang, Chen, Ma, Xiang, Zhou, Qian, and others, as well as WeChat chat records, identification records, search warrants and search records, price tags, purchase orders, expert opinions, surveillance videos, lists of seized and returned items, cash register slips, household registration information, and records of how they were apprehended, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that starting from October 2013, defendants Mei and Zhuang rented Unit F207 on the second floor of the front section of Decheng Comprehensive Market, 265-271 Yide Road in a certain district of this city, as the business location for "Gang Fu Fang Trading Firm." They also rented the mezzanine on the first floor at 68 Haizhu South Road, Sanfuqian in the same district as a warehouse. Without possessing the "Drug Business License" or the "Imported Drug Business License," they sold "Huang Danyi Huo Luo Oil" and other medicines that were imported and tested without approval. Defendant Mei was mainly responsible for selling counterfeit drugs in the shop, while defendant Zhuang fulfilled orders at the warehouse and delivered goods to customers. At around 3 PM on June 19, 2014, defendants Mei and Zhuang were caught red-handed at the said store. In the store, six boxes of "Yian Tong Bao Ying Dan" and one bottle of "Hexing Huo Luo Oil" were seized. In the said warehouse, a total of 1,877 boxes (or tubes or bottles) of 26 types of medicines, including "Yu Yan Sang Bao Ying Dan," "Fujio Oil," "Children's Fortunate Cold Remedy," and "Huang Danyi Huo Luo Oil," along with three sales receipts amounting to a total sales value of 4,050.5 yuan, were confiscated. The Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in Guangzhou Municipality identified all the seized medicines as counterfeit drugs. Defendant Mei and Zhuang raised no objection to these facts during the trial, which are supported by evidence such as photographs of the items involved, crime scene photos, delivery receipts, search records, and lists of items seized, lease agreements for the locations involved, arrest reports issued by the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Unit of a certain district branch of Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau, testimony from witness Zhang, confessions from defendants Mei and Zhuang, a certification opinion from the Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in Guangzhou, and the household registration materials of defendants Mei and Zhuang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The Shuangliu District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in July 2019, the defendants Chen and Jian promised to purchase bank cards from the defendants Xiong and Liang for 1,500 RMB each. Subsequently, the defendants Xiong and Liang obtained bank cards and USB security tokens from the Shuangliu Jialong Port Branch of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and handed them over to the defendants Chen and Jian. Defendant Chen then sent the bank cards to a higher-level accomplice for use, and the card was involved in fraudulent transactions amounting to over 200,000 RMB.


Defendants Yi and Liu had no objections to the criminal facts and charges brought by the public prosecution. Upon investigation, it was found that at around 6 a.m. on July 4, 2014, defendants Yi and Liu boarded a Qingfeng Xu bus heading in a certain direction from the Xinxian Village Service Center Station in Zhonggu Town, a district of a certain city, intending to commit theft. At around 7 a.m. on the same day, after transferring to the next Qingfeng Xu bus, near the back door, defendant Liu used a folding umbrella he was carrying to block others' view, while defendant Yi took the opportunity to steal 490 RMB in cash from the pocket of victim Cheng’s pants. After succeeding, the two immediately got off at the Xude Road bus stop, where they were subsequently arrested by waiting police officers. The stolen money was returned to the victim.

Furthermore, it was found that defendant Liu truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft after being brought to the case. It was also found that Liu was previously sentenced to two years in prison by Fengdu County People's Court in Chongqing City in March 1995 for an offense, and to six months in prison and a fine of 1,000 RMB by the former Luwan District People's Court of a certain city in February 2010 for another offense.

These facts are corroborated by victim Cheng's statement and identification records, the testimony and identification records of witnesses Jin and Jing, the confession and identification records of defendant Liu, the seizure warrant, list of seized and returned items issued by the Putuo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, an arrest report, a criminal judgment, online inquiry information from police business files, the defendant's household registration information, and other evidence verified in court, to which defendants Yi and Liu also confessed.


After trial, it was found that around December 2017, the defendants Liu, Li, and Xu conspired in advance to rent room 201, building 21, area 5, Gangzhong New Village, Dagang Street, New District, in a certain location to set up a casino for personal profit, which they intended to split equally. Xu and Liu provided the venue and gambling equipment, Liu hired people to clean and cook, and Li was responsible for attracting gamblers. On February 26, 2018, when the New District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau inspected the location, they caught 12 gamblers on-site and seized gambling funds totaling RMB 23,010 and an illegal profit of RMB 5,740. On February 26, 2018, defendant Xu was summoned by the public security organs; defendants Liu and Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs on March 5 and March 6, 2018, respectively. After arriving at the case, all three defendants truthfully confessed the relevant facts. During the trial, defendants Liu, Li, and Xu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhao, Huan, Deng, Zhu, Wang B, Huang, Yang, Wang D, Xu A, Yan, Wu B, Zhang, Gong, Yin, Wang C, Zong, Xie, Wu A, Ge, Xu B, Wang A, and Liu A, who were cross-examined in court. The evidence further includes inspection and identification records, gambling equipment, gambling funds, money boxes as physical evidence, police registration forms, case acceptance forms, details of the arrest, item seizure and return lists, administrative penalty decisions, household registration data, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Li, and Xu, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts. The defense counsel for defendant Liu argued that Liu has the circumstance of voluntary surrender and has actively prepaid the fine, requesting leniency in sentencing and the application of probation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of July 19, 2013, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Yu and Dong, in room 306 of the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel at No. 60 Danfeng Fourth Village, located in a certain district of a certain city, harbored drug users Xu, Zhang, and Cai to jointly consume the drug methamphetamine. It was further ascertained that on July 19, 2013, defendants Yu and Dong were apprehended in room 306 of the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel in a certain district of a certain city. The defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts during the court trial, and the evidence from witnesses Cai, Xu, Zhang, and Li, as well as the defendants' household registration provided by the public security authorities, the guest accommodation registration form from the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel, the account of the arrest, the public security administrative penalty decision, inspection records, identification records, and on-site testing report, are sufficient to establish these facts.


After examination, it was found that at around 19:00 on November 22, 2013, defendants Guo and Li went to the entrance of the stairway on the first floor of Unit 4, Building U3, Tianyu Apartments, Yinwan Garden, in a certain district of a certain city. There, they saw a black Suzuki King Star electric scooter (motor number: 1306295348, frame number: 20130569010, valued at 2,565 yuan) belonging to Liu that was parked without an anti-theft lock, and they stole it together. At around 13:00 on December 25, 2013, defendants Guo and Li were discovered by security personnel from the Shilin Hotel while attempting to steal an electric scooter in the dormitory area behind Shilin Hotel on North Bay West Road in a certain district of a certain city, and they were caught on the spot. After being apprehended, defendants Guo and Li truthfully confessed to their crimes. The above facts were not contested by defendants Guo and Li during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by the criminal judgment and release certificate, household registration certificate, witness testimonies, victim’s statement, defendants’ confessions, valuation and appraisal conclusions notice, site identification records, and identification site photos.


The public prosecution agency charges: On April 8, 2019, at approximately 3:00 p.m., defendant Wu arranged for defendant Liu and the victim, Zhou, to install elevator guide rails in a district of a certain city. When Liu and Zhou were installing at the 19th floor position, five elevator suspension wire ropes slipped from the fixed device on the counterweight side in the machine room, causing them to fall with the work platform to the bottom of the elevator shaft. Despite rescue efforts, the victim Zhou died, and defendant Liu sustained injuries, which were assessed as minor injuries of the first degree. Technical appraisal determined the cause of the elevator fall to be: 1. After the wire rope ends were combined, the split pin on the tapered sleeve was not removed in time, causing the wire rope ends to slip in the rope end combination; 2. The speed limiter and safety gear linkage device were ineffective. The "4•8" elevator installation injury general accident investigation team in the certain city's district recognized that defendant Liu, as an elevator installer, did not install the elevator equipment according to the elevator installation process requirements, violating the relevant provisions of article x of the "Production Safety Law of the People's Republic of China," article x of the "Special Equipment Safety Law of the People's Republic of China," and article x of the "Regulations on Safety Supervision of Special Equipment"; defendant Wu, as the main person responsible for the on-site elevator installation business contracted by Longhai Company, failed to adequately check the safety and identify hazards at the elevator installation site, did not timely detect safety hazards in the elevator installation site, and lacked sufficient safety education and installation skills training for the elevator installation personnel, violating the relevant provisions of article x of the "Production Safety Law of the People's Republic of China" and article x of the "Special Equipment Safety Law of the People's Republic of China," and both bear primary responsibility for the occurrence of the accident. After the incident, defendants Liu and Wu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities upon telephone notification and truthfully confessed the facts of the case; defendant Wu has compensated the victim Zhou's family with 1.65 million RMB and obtained the family's forgiveness.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On November 30, 2013, at around 20:00, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu, after premeditation, went to the west side of the road by the construction site of Tianhong International Garden Community in Shengze Town, in a certain district of a certain city. They used a hacksaw to cut cable wires and other means to steal "100*2*0.4" model cable wires measuring 278.75 meters, which were valued at 5,784 RMB from a victim unit, a certain sub-bureau of a certain telecommunications bureau in a certain city. On January 16, 2014, Luo, Xu, and Hu voluntarily surrendered at the Oriental Silk Market Police Station of a certain district Public Security Bureau in a certain city and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. After the incident, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu jointly compensated the victim unit with 20,000 RMB. To substantiate the criminal facts of the above charges, the prosecution submitted relevant evidence, and based on this, believes that the actions of the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. The defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu are all principal culprits. The defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu all surrendered voluntarily. Please sentence according to the law. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu during the court trial, and supported by evidence including testimonies from witnesses Gao, Zhu, Yang, Pan, identification transcripts, photographs, measurement records, a list of evidence, scene diagrams, a repair list, price verification conclusion, scene inspection transcripts, location maps, schematic diagrams, and a settlement agreement.


A certain city's district people's procuratorate charged: 1. On June 25, 2016, at approximately 4 am, the defendants Tan and Lu were at the foot of Building G, World Trade West City, No. 98 Donglu, University Road, in a certain district of this city. Lu acted as a lookout while Tan stole a red Xinri-brand electric bike (license plate: Nanning 721**) belonging to the victim Yao, which was parked there. The assessment determined that the vehicle was worth RMB 2880 at the time of the crime. 2. On June 26, 2016, at approximately 4 am, the defendant Tan stole a purple Xinri-brand electric bike (license plate: Nanning 9L2**) belonging to the victim Lin, which was parked in front of a Zhou Zhou Tin Foil Clam Vermicelli shop near the entrance of Guangxi University of Finance and Economics on Nongyuan Road in a certain district of this city. The assessment determined that this vehicle was worth RMB 2528 at the time of the crime. To substantiate the above facts, the prosecuting authority provided evidence such as the registration form for the criminal case acceptance, household registration certificate, basic information form of personnel, the arrest process, list of seized and returned items, list of evidence retrieval, on-site inspection report, administrative penalty decision, statement of circumstances, testimony of witness Teng, statements of victims Yao and Lin, confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Lu, price assessment conclusion, identification record, on-site identification record and photos, on-site surveillance video, etc. The authority believes that the actions of the defendants Tan and Lu violated article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and that they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of X. During the trial, defendants Tan and Lu did not dispute the facts and charges in the indictment and voluntarily pleaded guilty. After reviewing the case, it was found that the prosecuting authority's charges against defendants Tan and Lu for the crime of X were clear, and the evidence was sufficient to confirm the charges. It was also found that the purple Xinri-brand electric bike involved in the case had been lawfully seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Lin.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on April 28, 2014, at approximately 16:00, the defendant Hu, without a license, was driving an ordinary three-wheeled cargo motorcycle with the license plate NingC××××× along Yinheng Road in a certain district of a certain city from east to west. At a location 50 meters east of a certain logistics overpass, he collided with the victim, Wu, who was riding an ordinary two-wheeled motorcycle with the license plate NingC×××××, also traveling from east to west along Yinheng Road. The collision caused Wu and his two-wheeled motorcycle to fall to the ground, whereupon the defendant Zhang, driving a light ordinary truck with the license plate NingA×××××, ran over Wu at the same location, resulting in Wu's immediate death and damage to the two-wheeled motorcycle. After the accident, both Hu and Zhang fled the scene. According to the determination by the Second Squadron of the Traffic Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of a certain district in a certain city, Hu and Zhang bear the main responsibility for this accident.


After examination, it was found that at approximately 10:00 p.m. on January 12, 2015, defendants Yang and Sheng were consuming at a S Benqing Bar at the intersection of Honghua Po Road and Shuguang Middle Road, Yuhua District, in a certain city. Due to dissatisfaction with the service provided by the waiter, the victim Zhou, they got into a dispute with him. During the argument, defendant Sheng punched the victim Zhou in the face, while defendant Yang hit the victim Zhou on the head with a beer bottle and punched him in the face, then fled the scene. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by victim Zhou constitute minor injuries of the second degree. On May 4, 2015, defendants Yang and Sheng reached a mediation agreement with victim Zhou, compensating him for his economic losses with 140,000 RMB and obtaining his understanding. On May 26, 2015, around 10:00 a.m., defendants Yang and Sheng voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendant Yang during the trial, and are evidenced by the case acceptance record provided by Zuojia Tang Police Station of Yuhua Branch, a certain city's Public Security Bureau, the statement regarding the retrieval of surveillance video, identification records and photos, the Forensic Medicine Human Injury Assessment Certificate No. [2015] 096 issued by (Yu) Gong (Wu) Jian (Falin), photos of victim Zhou's injuries, the mediation agreement, receipt and letter of understanding from victim Zhou, this court's (2008) Yu Xing Chu Zi No. 501 Criminal Judgment, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Moujia, Hu Mou, and Zhang Mouyi, the statement of victim Zhou, as well as the confessions and identity and behavioral materials of defendants Yang and Sheng, all sufficient to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Tinghu District in a certain city charged that on September 3, 2013, at around 2 a.m., defendants Tang and Xu conspired and went to an animation city in the southern new district of the city. Defendant Xu kept watch while defendant Tang broke the lock to enter the premises and stole one Changsheng brand "Fish World" V109 fishing machine main unit and an extension board, one Changsheng brand "Olympic Five Rings" V211 fishing machine main unit, one Tianmin brand DVR4000H hard disk video recorder, and other items, with a total value of 35,245 RMB. After being apprehended, defendants Tang and Xu confessed to the aforementioned facts. To prove the facts of the charges, the prosecutor questioned the two defendants in court and read out and presented evidence such as the victim's statements, witness testimonies, a price appraisal opinion issued by the Price Certification Center of the city's Price Bureau, an explanation of the arrest circumstances of defendants Tang and Xu issued by the Southern New District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, and a list of seized and returned items.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In August 2020, the defendants Chen and Lin registered three gambling accounts and engaged in gambling on an online platform named "Yongli International." Subsequently, after discussion, the two decided to recruit people to use these gambling accounts for the purpose of obtaining cashback on gambling funds' turnover. They recruited individuals such as Lin1 at a chess and card room on Huancheng South Road in Dinghai District to participate in gambling activities on the website. As of October 10 of the same year, the aforementioned accounts of the defendants Chen and Lin had a total betting amount of over 36 million RMB, with an effective betting amount of over 32 million RMB. The defendants Chen and Lin did not contest the above facts during the court hearing. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin1, Lin2, and Zhang; records of searches; onsite photographs; seizure decisions; lists of seized items; confirmation lists for the storage of involved assets; extraction records; identification records; mobile phone screenshots; electronic evidence inspection work records; mobile phone examination data; online extraction work records; administrative penalty decisions; household registration proofs; and the arrest process, which are sufficient for a determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province accused defendant Zhu of hiding drugs in the bedroom of the rental residence, Room 402, Building 9, Kaixuan Mingdi Community, Jing'an Road, in a certain district of the city. On August 2, 2013, at around 3:00 PM, defendant Zhu called his girlfriend, defendant Chang, from downstairs in the community, asking her to bring down 1,500 hidden pills of "Magu." Defendant Chang then took the drugs from the bedroom, wrapped them in plastic wrap, placed them in a cake box, and brought them downstairs. Both defendants Zhu and Chang were immediately apprehended by officer Gong. Officer Gong confiscated 8 packets of tablet drugs from the cake box on the spot and found a packet of granular drugs and a packet of powdered drugs in defendant Chang’s bag. According to the appraisal, the aforementioned tablet and granular drugs were identified as methamphetamine, weighing a total of 131.00 grams; the powdered drug was identified as ketamine, weighing 0.80 grams. Subsequently, officer Gong escorted the two defendants upstairs and found 8 packets of tablet drugs and 1 packet of powdered drug in their room. According to the appraisal, the tablet drugs were methamphetamine, weighing 165.22 grams; the powdered drug was ketamine, weighing 1,043.53 grams. These facts are confirmed by the evidence provided, including the apprehension and case-solving process issued by the public security organs; search records; seizure decision and inventory list along with photographs; drug test appraisal report; on-site test report; and the confessions of defendants Zhu and Chang.


After examination, it was found that on the evening of September 13, 2014, defendants Liu, Li, Ma, and others went to the "Heshunxiang" restaurant on Heping West Road in the Economic Development Zone of a certain city to eat barbecue. During the meal, Li went to toast at Xu's table, who was also dining at the restaurant. Liu thought that Guo, sitting at the same table as Xu, was insulting Li, so he stood up and started to beat Guo, who was then pulled away by someone. As Guo walked east along the sidewalk of Heping West Road, he saw Liu and Ma following him, so he pulled out a dagger and drove Liu and Ma away. Later, Li, holding a steel bar, and Ma, holding a stool, beat Guo, who was pulled away by others. Liu then took the steel bar from Li and beat Guo again, causing Guo to sustain an open comminuted fracture of the middle segment of the left ulna. According to the appraisal, Guo's ulnar fracture was classified as minor injury level one. After the incident, Liu and Ma voluntarily went to the public security authorities to surrender and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. The three defendants reached a criminal reconciliation agreement with Guo, compensating him a total of 170,000 yuan for economic losses, and Guo expressed understanding of the actions of the three defendants. The above facts were undisputed by the three defendants during the court trial process, and were confirmed by the statements of the victim Guo, testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang and Xu, forensi


The prosecution alleges that at around 9:00 on April 24, 2015, officers from the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau, while initially understanding the conflict between Li's husband, Li A, and neighbor Zhao B, verbally summoned Li A and Zhao B to the Donglianhuayuan Police Station for a detailed investigation. During the forced removal of Li A, defendants Yang and Li (Li A's sister) knowingly obstructed Zhao A and others in their law enforcement duties by means of beating and pushing, despite being aware that Zhao A from the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau was lawfully executing his duties. As a result, Zhao A was injured, and the forensic examination by the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau determined the injury to be minor.


After trial, it was found that from approximately 20:00 to 22:30 on February 17, 2011, defendants Shao and Zhang, for the purpose of drawing illegal profits, used methods such as making phone calls and coordinating at intersections to gather individuals including Fang, Zhang Jia, Wang Jia, Lu Jia, Xiang, He, and Hu at the home of Lu Bing in a certain village, a certain street, in a city of Zhejiang Province, to gamble in the form of "Bai Moumou." Lu Yi, Mao Jia, Mao Yi, Zhang Yi, and Lu Ding also arrived at Lu Bing's home to participate in the gambling. They were later caught on the spot by police officers from the Lanjiang Police Station of a certain city public security bureau, with over 210,000 yuan of gambling funds seized on site. On April 15 and September 23, 2011, defendants Shao and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs respectively. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court, recognized by this court: 1. The confessions and identification transcripts of defendants Shao and Zhang; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Zhang Jia, He, Lu Jia, Lu Yi, Wu, Mao Jia, Mao Yi, Xiang, Hu, Xu, Lu Bing, Wang Yi, Zhang Yi, Lu Ding, Pan, Ye, Jiang, and Fang; 3. Inspection records, onsite gambling case fund registration forms, lists of seized items; 4. Seizure decision documents, lists of confiscated items; 5. The process of surrender and self-surrender proof documents; 6. Household registration certificates of defendants Shao and Zhang, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charged: Around April 2012, defendants Cheng, Zhu, and Xu conspired to commit theft. Cheng and Zhu pre-planned to carry out the theft, with Xu specifically responsible for driving and transporting the stolen goods. In the early hours of April 15, 2012, the three defendants drove a van with the license plate SuE××××× from a certain city to the Xinwu Economic Development Zone in a certain county. After discovering a construction site of Wuhu DunAn Zhongyuan Co., Ltd., Cheng and Zhu got out of the vehicle and entered the site to steal 1,258 fasteners. They moved the stolen fasteners to a roadside several hundred meters away from the site and then called Xu to pick them up. While waiting for Xu, Cheng and Zhu entered the construction site a second time to steal more and were discovered, leading them to flee the scene. As Xu prepared to assist Cheng and Zhu, he was discovered near the site by a person named Zhou and others and awaited the police at the scene. According to a valuation appraisal, the stolen fasteners were valued at a total of 6,127 RMB. On April 18, 2013, defendant Cheng turned himself in to the police. On May 31, 2013, defendant Zhu also surrendered to the police. After being brought to justice, all three defendants truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng, Zhu, and Xu during the trial and were further corroborated by the testimony of witness Hong; statements from victims Zhou and Luo; documentary evidence including household registration information, details of the case, inventory records, and situation reports; an appraisal report from the price appraisal center of the county; and investigation and inspection records such as identification records, pointing-out records, and on-site inspection records. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 11:00 on August 12, 2016, police officers Dai, Wan, and Zhou from the Chengdong Police Station of the Hailing Branch of the Taizhou Public Security Bureau, bearing police identification and a summons warrant, lawfully summoned the defendant Sun, who was suspected of drug use, in a restaurant located in the Chengdong Street of Hailing District in this city. Defendant Sun refused to comply with the summons and assaulted officer Wan, punching him in the face. Seeing the situation, defendant Wei, in conjunction with defendant Sun, assaulted three police officers by pulling and shoving them, obstructing the officers from lawfully performing their duties, resulting in injuries to the neck and hands of the three officers. An assessment later determined that the injuries of victims Zhou and Wan constituted minor injuries. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Wei during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statements of victims Dai, Zhou, and Wan, testimonies from witnesses Zhai1, Yan, Zhu, Zhai2, and Zhai3, as well as the case registration form, forensic injury assessment report, medical diagnosis certification, examination records, on-site testing report, criminal judgment documents, materials related to release after serving the sentence, arrest records, video materials, and photographs, all of which are adequate to support the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic Development Zone charges: 1. At approximately 18:00 on September 24, 2015, defendant Cao, together with defendants Li and Wang, drove a vehicle to a certain location. At the local train station, defendant Cao pretended to be a civil affairs officer from the township where the victims resided, and defendant Li pretended to be Cao's driver. By claiming they would give the victims, Zhu and Liu, a ride home, they gained their trust and subsequently cheated Zhu out of 3,500 yuan and Liu out of 4,000 yuan. 2. At approximately 6:00 on October 2, 2015, defendant Cao, with defendants Li and Wang, drove to the local train station. Defendant Li pretended to be an employee at the township and a relative of a village Party branch secretary of the victim, while defendant Cao pretended to be Li's driver. By claiming they would give the victim, Dong, a ride home, they gained Dong's trust and subsequently cheated Dong out of 13,000 yuan. It was further found that defendants Cao and Li were responsible for selecting targets for fraud, while defendant Wang waited at designated locations. At the time of the incident, public security officers seized 420 yuan in cash from defendant Li, 69 yuan from Wang, and 200.5 yuan from Cao. During the trial, the relatives of defendants Cao, Li, and Wang compensated victims Zhu with 3,500 yuan and Liu with 4,000 yuan, gaining the victims' forgiveness. They also compensated victim Dong with 12,310.5 yuan. The relatives of defendants Cao, Li, and Wang paid fines of 5,000 yuan each on their behalf. These facts are not contested by defendants Cao, Li, and Wang during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the testimonies of victims Zhu, Liu, and Dong, identification records, crime discovery and arrest records, inventory of seized items, bank search records, surveillance footage, household registration proof, criminal judgment No. 808 from the criminal division of the Guan District People's Court of a certain province and city (200), criminal judgment No. 131 from the criminal division of the People's Court of Lankao County of a certain province (2013), as well as evidence of release upon completion of sentence, letters of forgiveness, and receipts, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accuses that, on November 21, 2014, at around 9 am, the defendants Zhou and Yang, after premeditation, were in Room 1001 on the 10th floor of Zhongsheng Hotel in this city. Zhou, under the pretense of needing a toothbrush, tricked the hotel maid into opening the door. Yang took the opportunity to hide in the shower of Room 1001. After Zhou and the maid briefly stayed in the room and then left, Yang stole 5,000 yuan in cash from the wallet of the victim Zhao. The two defendants split and spent the stolen money.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao, having lost money to Tong during gambling, suspected Tong of cheating during the games and sought to recoup their losses from him. On December 10, 2012, around 18:00, Lu and Shao encountered Tong in a village in Cicheng Town within this district and demanded to know why Tong had cheated during gambling. Tong denied the accusation and attempted to flee. The two stopped Tong from leaving and, around 19:00 that evening, took him to Room 303 of the Wenxin Hotel in the Hongtang Subdistrict of the district. In the room, the two continued to question Tong about the cheating and called Ge to join them. After Ge arrived, he vented his anger by hitting Tong with an ashtray from the room and then punching him. Under duress, Tong agreed to return the money to the three. After Tong wrote an IOU, they allowed him to leave around 21:00 that evening. On January 5, 2013, defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao turned themselves in to the public security authorities. To prove the aforementioned facts, the procuratorate submitted to the court the statements of the victim, Tong; documentary evidence, including details of provincial lodgings, the case-solving process, and basic population information; witness testimonies concerning the process of the defendants' arrival at the authorities; an expert assessment on the degree of physical injury from forensic medicine; and the confessions of defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao, among other evidence.


The prosecution alleges that on May 12, 2015, at around 6:00 p.m., the defendant Chen, carrying drugs, went to the entrance of the "Shizu Convenience Store" on Shuixin Road, Shuixin Street, a certain district in a certain city, and sold three packages of drugs to the defendant Ye for 900 yuan. Subsequently, the defendant Ye, carrying the aforementioned drugs, went to a location near the Shuixin Market in a certain district in a certain city, and sold them to Wu for 1,200 yuan. Later, he was apprehended by the police and three packages of drugs were confiscated, along with a Samsung mobile phone, which was the criminal communication device seized from the defendant Chen. According to the evaluation, the total weight of the confiscated drugs was 2.46 grams, with methamphetamine components detected. The above-stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Ye and Chen during the court proceedings, and they are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu and "A Hai," the physicochemical test report, the seizure warrant, the list of seized items and the return list, a situation statement, call records, the account of the arrest, identity verification materials, and records of prior offenses, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was found that on the evening of March 4, 2014, the victim, Wang A, was deceived by Zhang (handled in a separate case) into coming to the Tianjin Tiens pyramid scheme den at No. 25, Fourth Floor, Second Row of the Bridge, Jinqiao Village, Fuchun Street, in this city from his hometown in a certain state under the pretext of a job introduction. The defendants, Ma, Guo, Chen, joined by Ding and Liu (both handled in separate cases) among others, illegally restricted Wang A's personal freedom by confiscating his mobile phone and watching over him in turns to force him to join the pyramid scheme organization. On March 9 of the same year, Wang A fell accidentally while trying to escape from the fourth floor by climbing along a water pipe to escape the surveillance and was rescued after seeking help from the public. As a result of the fall, Wang A sustained multiple fractures in the pelvis and thoracolumbar vertebrae. According to a forensic appraisal, Wang A's injuries are classified as minor injuries of the first degree. During the trial of this case, the defendant Chen entrusted his family to pay compensation of 5,000 yuan to this court. The aforementioned facts, to which the defendants Ma, Guo, and Chen raised no objections during the court hearing, are corroborated by Wang A's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Gong, Wang B, Wei, and Wu, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ma, Guo, and Chen, the on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, evidence list retrieved by the Fuyang Public Security Bureau, medical records copy, seizure records, seizure decision and list, photos, forensic appraisal on human injury degree and injury photos, the case background, explanatory notes, detention certificate, household registration certification, and other evidence, which are sufficient for the conviction.


The prosecution alleges that on the morning of September 12, 2016, defendant Zhang invited defendant Xu to have breakfast at the Xincun bus station in Zhenxiong County and suggested to Xu that they commit pickpocketing. Subsequently, the two defendants went to the streets to look for a target. At around 9 a.m. that day, while walking to the central park on Nandajie Street in Zhenxiong County, they saw a pedestrian, Zhai, place his phone into his breast pocket after making a call. Zhang instructed Xu to cover him while he committed the theft. They followed Zhai to the sidewalk near the Agricultural Bank in the central park on Nandajie Street. Zhang used a pair of tweezers he carried to steal a rose-gold "VIVO" brand smartphone from Zhai and handed the phone to Xu for safekeeping. According to the Zhenxiong County Price Appraisal Center, the stolen phone was valued at 2,480 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that in July 2017, the defendant Yang used an ID card with a canceled household registration and a false income certificate to fraudulently obtain a credit card from the Agricultural Bank of China Ningling County Branch, with an overdraft amount exceeding 10,000 yuan. Defendant Han, knowing that the ID card used by Yang had a canceled household registration, still provided a false income certificate for Yang, helping Yang fraudulently obtain a credit card from the Agricultural Bank of China. After the case was discovered, Yang repaid all the debts. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted to the court the confessions and defenses of the defendants, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, identification records, and photographs.


After trial, it was found that defendants Li and Sun, after premeditation, on July 16, 2012, at approximately 11 a.m., near the Qingchun Wuhui Internet Cafe on Pingyang Street in a certain district of a certain city, with the pretense of cashing out a credit card for the victim Lü, deceived Lü into borrowing an Industrial and Commercial Bank of China credit card from another person. The two defendants used a Jilin Bank ATM to withdraw cash and purchase gold jewelry, extracting a total of 37,743 RMB from the card. The illicit funds obtained were completely squandered by the two defendants. After the crime, Sun's family compensated the victim Lü with 37,743 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Sun during the trial and were confirmed by the evidence such as the arrest record provided by the public security bureau, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, and identification records, sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On March 10, 2014, at around 17:00, defendants Xiao and Chen, together with Luo Mou-wen (handled in a separate case), went to a stall near the Changhe Town Cangtian Farmers' Market in Cixi City and stole a Samsung I9100 phone (valued at 1,530 RMB) from Zhao Mou's pocket. After being brought to justice, defendants Xiao and Chen both truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. After the incident, relatives of defendants Xiao and Chen compensated the economic loss of the victim, totaling 1,530 RMB, on their behalf. Defendant Xiao provided important clues to the public security organs, which led to the solving of other criminal cases. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Xiao and Chen during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by various evidence, including the victim Zhao Mou's statement, testimonies from witnesses Chen Mou and Wu Mou-hui, recognition records and photographs, receipts, meritorious service materials, decisions of public security administrative penalties, price appraisal reports, the account of the capture, and the identification of defendants Xiao and Chen. These are sufficient to establish the facts. Based on the aforementioned criminal facts and circumstances, the public prosecution agency recommends sentencing defendants Xiao and Chen to penal measures ranging from five months of detention to one year of imprisonment, along with fines.


The prosecution alleged that from April to July 2013, the defendant Zhang obtained a "baccarat" online gambling account from his superior "Aqing" (real name unknown, at large) and provided the betting codes to the defendant Wei. After receiving the codes from Zhang, Wei subsequently provided a total of 175,000 RMB in betting codes to Ying, Yu, Zhu, and others for gambling. Zhang illegally profited approximately 10,000 RMB from these activities, while Wei profited approximately 22,000 RMB. On July 30, 2013, Zhang and Wei were apprehended by local police officers, who seized 2 computers and 5 mobile phones on the spot. After the incident, Zhang reported the crimes of others, and this was verified to be true. These facts were not disputed by Zhang and Wei during the court trial and are supported by evidence, including documentary evidence extraction records, seizure orders, photos, bank transaction details, a criminal judgment, release certificates, population information, "arrest procedures," and "explanation of meritorious deeds," as well as testimonies from witnesses Ying, Yu, Zhu, Liu, and Tan, identification records, photo explanations, electronic evidence inspection records, and data CDs. This evidence is sufficient to conclude the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On August 15, 2015, at approximately 3:00 PM, the defendant Wang, after drinking alcohol, invited defendants Li, Zhou, and Chen to Jiangzhou Square Gas Station in Yangzhong City, where they arbitrarily assaulted the victims Jiang and Liu by punching and kicking them. According to the assessment, the injuries of victims Jiang and Liu were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li compensated victims Jiang and Liu for their losses and obtained their forgiveness. These facts were not contested by defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Jiang and Liu, the testimony of witness Mei, household registration documents, the case registration form, the case filing decision, the account of their arrival at the scene, identification transcripts and photos, explanatory notes, audio-visual materials, and the forensic bodily injury assessment report issued by the Evidence Appraisal Office of the Yangzhong City Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 11:00 pm on May 26, 2016, defendants Su and Xiao, carrying tools such as electric fishing machines and electric fishing rods, went to the prohibited fishing zone of the Lijiang River near a certain lodge on a certain road in a certain district of Guilin City to engage in electric fishing. At around midnight, they were apprehended by the patrol team of the First Squad of the Guilin Municipal Public Security Bureau's Lijiang Scenic Area Branch and found with one set of electric fishing equipment and 5 pounds of fish caught on the spot. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Su and Xiao during the trial proceedings. Furthermore, there is: 1. documentary evidence including household registration materials, the process of arrest, list of seized items, location map, announcements from the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China regarding the implementation of the Pearl River fishing ban system, the Guilin Municipal Government's announcement regarding the implementation of the Lijiang River fishing ban system, official letters and replies, situation statements, photos of tools used in the crime and the fish caught; 2. statements and defenses from defendants Su and Xiao; 3. records and photos of the seizure, site identification records, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that from early June to mid-July and from late July to August 5, 2012, the defendants Zhang and Wang, together with Yu, Xu, Peng (A), Chen, and Li (all already sentenced), jointly set up a casino on the mountain in Shangjin Village and next to Shangjin Village Reservoir in a certain town of a certain city, organizing gambling in the form of "Pai Gow." They arranged for Huang (A), Xiao, Tang, Zou, Xiang, Peng (B), and Huang (C) (all already sentenced) to collect commissions and serve as lookouts for the casino. During this period, the casino held two sessions daily, with more than twenty participants each time, yielding an average daily commission of over 3,000 yuan, totaling over 100,000 yuan in commissions. On June 18 and 19, 2013, the defendants Wang and Zhang successively surrendered to the public security authorities. After the incident, the defendant Zhang assisted the police in capturing a suspect. During the trial of this case, the defendants Wang and Zhang each returned illicit gains of 3,000 yuan and 7,000 yuan, respectively. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Zhang during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Luo (A), Yu, Chen, Peng (A), Li, Xu, Huang (A), Zou, Tang, Huang (B), Zheng, Luo (B), and others, along with the criminal identification records, receipts for returned illicit gains, criminal judgment documents of co-defendants, compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation decision documents, certificates of meritorious service, statements of surrender circumstances, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for reaching a verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 23:30 on October 20, 2014, at the intersection of San Dike Kou Creek Road and Huaihai Road in Suixi County, Huang, driving an Anhui F Honda Accord car, turned right from west to south when victim Zhang B stopped his car and insulted Huang. Defendant Wu, who was in the Honda car, had a dispute with Zhang B. Defendants Li and Yu came after hearing the news, and the three defendants injured Zhang B with fists and kicks. According to forensic identification, Zhang B's injury was determined to be minor injury level two. It was further found: On November 5, 2014, Wu, Li, and Yu compensated Zhang B for economic losses amounting to 85,000 yuan; both parties reconciled and executed the agreement, and Zhang B expressed forgiveness for Wu, Li, and Yu's actions. On November 12, 2014, defendant Wu was arrested by Huaibei City Public Security Bureau, and on November 14 of the same year, defendants Li and Yu voluntarily surrendered to Suixi County Public Security Bureau. After coming forward, the three defendants truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu, Li, and Yu during the trial and are confirmed by the situation registration form, the process of getting to the scene, household information, appraisal opinion, victim Zhang B’s statement, testimony of witnesses Huang, Zhang A, and Zhu, the agreement, and receipt, which are sufficient to establish.


After trial, it was found: On March 16, 2016, the defendant He learned that there was a package at the courier company where he worked, which required a cash on delivery of 3,800 RMB. He then conspired with the defendant Zhang to steal this package. At around 3 a.m. the following day, defendants Zhang and He went to the Yuantong Courier Company in Huajie Town, Yongkang City. Defendant Zhang climbed over the wall and entered the courier company's warehouse, while defendant He stayed outside the wall to assist, and they stole the package. They later delivered the package to the recipient and collected the payment of 3,800 RMB. Afterwards, defendant He received 2,300 RMB, and defendant Zhang received 1,500 RMB. After the incident, the families of both defendants each refunded 3,800 RMB to the courier company. The facts mentioned above were acknowledged by defendants Zhang and He during the trial, and are supported by the confessions of defendants Zhang and He, the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Yang, and Pan, the identification records and photos, the seizure order, the list and photos of seized items, the receipt, the letter of understanding, surveillance footage, population information, and the process of bringing the defendants to justice, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


According to the charges brought by the People's Procuratorate of a certain place, between the end of May and early June 2015, the defendant Zhang, after losing money multiple times to Shi and others while gambling through Mahjong and "Luo A," suspected Shi and others of cheating. On the afternoon of June 7th of the same year, after pre-arranging with defendant Wang and others, Zhang planned to first go to the Fat Sister's Home-style Restaurant on Lushan Street, Shengzhou City, to gamble with Shi and others that evening. Meanwhile, Wang would gather people to rush into the casino to help recover the more than 30,000 yuan lost in gambling, offering cigarettes as a reward. At around 8 p.m. on the same day, during the gambling session at the Fat Sister's Home-style Restaurant on Lushan Street, defendant Zhang called defendant Wang as previously arranged. Wang then led accomplices Zhou, Bian, Lu, Ma, Lou, and Zhu (a minor, dealt with in a separate case) into the restaurant, controlled those present, and used verbal threats and violence to force Shi and her boyfriend Jin to sign two blank IOUs and an IOU for 35,000 yuan. They also forcibly took Jin's car, a Ma A, valued over 102,000 yuan, as collateral, threatening to return the car only after payment. Additionally, Zhang and others forcibly collected 2,700 yuan in cash from Shi. After the incident, defendants Wang, Zhou, Lu, Ma, and Lou voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to their crimes. Zhang's family has compensated the victim Shi with 5,000 yuan, and received forgiveness. The vehicle has been retrieved and returned to the victim. All defendants and their defense attorneys raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Shi and Jin, witness testimonies from Zhu, Luo, Xing, Qian, and others, identification records and photographs, inventory of seized and returned items, IOUs, a price assessment report, information on the case history, household registration certificates, and explanatory notes. Additionally, it has been found that defendant Ma has received forgiveness from victim Shi, with a letter of forgiveness included in the records.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused the defendants Tao and Jiang. Due to trivial matters, Tao harbored a grudge against Yin and, in order to vent his personal anger, together with the defendant Jiang and Song (at large), went to the Century Garden Community in Rushan City at around 21:00 on May 24, 2014, wielding weapons to vandalize the sedan parked by Yin in the community. The damaged parts of the sedan were assessed to have a value of 7020 RMB.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that from January 2012 to June 2014, the defendants Yang and Chen, as the director of the Respiratory Department and members of the department management team at Chengdu University Affiliated Hospital, negotiated with pharmaceutical representatives Yang Gang and Yang Cheng (handled in another case) to pay drug rebates based on the amount of drugs used in the Respiratory Department. Defendant Chen received drug rebates monthly. From January 2012 to June 2014, the Respiratory Department received a total of more than 600,000 RMB in drug rebates from pharmaceutical representatives Yang Gang and Yang Cheng. After receiving the drug rebates, the defendants Yang, Chen, and others discussed and distributed the rebate money to the department doctors. On July 16, 2014, the anti-corruption and bribery bureau of the local People's Procuratorate notified defendants Yang and Chen to report to the local People's Procuratorate for investigation. After the investigation, defendant Yang returned 72,000 RMB, defendant Chen returned 43,000 RMB, and other doctors from the Respiratory Department collectively returned 110,500 RMB. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses of the defendants in court.


The prosecution alleges that in the early hours of August 9, 2015, the defendants Fan and Liu, together with Lin (handled in a separate case), went to the Hua Hao Huoli City store on Fuxibei Street in a certain city. They stole 36 stair treads made of steel plates and 24 pieces of steel plate scrap. Liu, Lin, and others sold the stolen stair treads and steel plate scrap that same night to a scrap collection station belonging to Chang Xin (handled in a separate case) in a certain village and place in the said city. According to an appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 4,905.98 yuan. The defendants raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, which are also corroborated by evidence such as surveillance screenshots of the theft, witness testimony, victim statements, identification records, the appraisal report, and the list of seized items, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of September 30, 2013, the defendants Long, Ceng, and Tang (handled in a separate case) conspired in the dormitory of the construction site of the Vanguard supermarket in Kaixuan City, Bao'an District, to enter the construction site through the ventilation opening to cut electric wires and sell them for money. After entering the construction site, the three cut three unused power cords, then stripped the wires in the dormitory, and together went to the roadside of Nanshan Daxin Village to sell the wires, obtaining illicit gains of 500 yuan. According to the appraisal, the stolen wires were worth 3,810 yuan. The site supervisor, Zhang, discovered that the cables had been cut, and by checking the surveillance, found that the electrician Ceng from the adjacent site was suspected of committing the crime. On October 8, 2013, Zhang located Ceng and talked to him, and Ceng admitted to the theft of the cables. Zhang's side then detained Long and the other three people who shared the dormitory with Ceng and later reported to the police. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by defendants Long and Ceng during the court trial, and there is relevant evidence verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that on June 4, 2013, the defendant Lv and the defendant Hu colluded and went to a room in the Mingdian Business Hotel near Shilong Railway Station in a certain city of a certain province to conduct illegal cash-out activities. The two used bank card information provided by others to clone bank cards and employed the bank POS machine provided by Wen Mouhua (handled in a separate case) to cash out a total of 1,000 yuan. On June 9, 2013, the defendants Lv and Hu, together with the accomplice Wen Mouhua, went to a room in the Xinhu Hotel in Shilong, a city of a certain province, and conducted illegal cash-out activities using the aforementioned method, cashing out a total of 6,000 yuan. On June 10, 2013, the defendants Lv and Hu, together with the accomplice Wen Mouhua and the "Wuhan person" (handled in a separate case), went to the aforementioned location and conducted illegal cash-out activities using the aforementioned method, cashing out a total of 6,000 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wenzhou accused: At the end of December 2014, defendants Feng and Ma, knowingly purchased stolen goods totaling around 700 pounds of stainless steel heads for over 3,000 yuan at a scrap purchasing point in a certain village of the Haibin Subdistrict, despite knowing they were stolen by Zhang (already sentenced). An appraisal determined that stainless steel heads of the same weight and quality are valued at 4,924 yuan. On March 7, 2015, defendants Feng and Ma turned themselves in to the public security authorities. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.


After trial, it was found that the defendants Du and Zhang, along with Wang A, Wang B (both handled in a separate case), the defendant Du's younger brother Du A (male, died at the age of 15), were originally employees of Dongyang Red Sun Electroacoustic Co., Ltd., residing in room 413 of the company's dormitory. Li (already sentenced), Yang A, Wen, Chen C (all handled in separate cases), and Chen A (name in the file) were also employees of the company and lived in room 416 of the company dormitory. On the evening of April 8, 2014, at around 11 p.m., the occupants of dormitory 413 were playing the stereo too loudly, disturbing others. After Li and Yang A's unsuccessful attempts to advise them, they entered room 413 with a broom handle and a kitchen knife to smash the stereo. After the stereo was turned off, Li and Yang A returned to dormitory 416.

That night, the defendants Du, Zhang, and Du A, along with Wang A went outside the factory to find Wang B and Li, intending to teach Li a le


The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District in [a certain city] charges: 1. In the early morning of a day in early August 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of rental housing at No. 125-5 Jiuyan, Qianqing Town, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of hot-wiring to steal an electric scooter parked there by Tan. The stolen electric scooter was appraised to be worth 300 yuan. 2. One early morning in August 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of rental housing at No. 261B-2 Xianlai, Binshu Village, Hutang Street, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal an electric scooter parked there by Li. The stolen electric scooter was appraised to be worth 300 yuan. 3. In the early morning of a day in early September 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of Luyuan Food Store, Xiaoju Village, Huashu Street, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal an Innovation brand motor-assisted bicycle parked there by Zhou. The stolen vehicle was appraised to be worth 2,375 yuan. In summary, the defendants Yuan and Ren conspired to commit theft three times, with the total value of the stolen property amounting to 2,975 yuan. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Yuan and Ren during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the arrest process and situational statements provided by police officers from the Public Security Bureau of Keqiao District, [a certain city], shopping invoices, criminal judgments, certificates of release after serving sentences, testimonies from Li, Miao, Chen, and Feng, statements from Tan, Li, and Zhou, valuation conclusion reports, and identification transcripts by the defendants Yuan and Ren, which are sufficient to support these findings.


Upon trial, it was found that around 3:00 PM on October 11, 2015, defendants Mao and Li, along with A Wan (handled in a separate case), brought the victim Liang, who owed gambling debts, back to a certain location in a certain sea after taking him from another place. They then illegally detained victim Liang in several hotels in the New Xiangzhou district of said sea city, including room 202 of Wenhua Hotel, room 8521 of Jinnuo Hotel, room 405 of Fengjing Hotel, and room 307 of Youpai Hotel, restricting his personal freedom and urging him to repay his debts. Around 9:00 PM on October 15, 2015, the public security organ arrested defendants Li and Mao in room 307 of Youpai Hotel and rescued victim Liang. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Mao and Li during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements and identification records of victim Liang, details of the arrest, seizure order and inventory list, checkout slips and domestic guest registration form from Youpai Hotel, checkout slips from Wenhua Hotel, Jinnuo Hotel, and Fengjing Hotel, promissory notes, on-site photographs, and other evidence, which are sufficient to conclude the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On February 27, 2017, after the police from the Kangle County Public Security Bureau arrested Ma 1 and Ma 2, they confiscated a small packet of suspected drugs from Ma 1, weighing 0.4 grams. Upon testing, the substance was identified as heroin. Ma 1 and Ma 2 confessed that the drugs were purchased that day through Fan's introduction from an individual from Guanghe named Ma. The prosecution provided relevant evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Qingshuihe charges: On December 6, 2018, in a certain county, defendant Kang opened a mahjong parlor with the intention of making a profit, charging fees and providing a venue for gambling for Wu and Qin (who has already been administratively punished) and others, conducting gatherings for gambling activities in the form of "Push the Pair" and "Digging for Treasure." This was uncovered by the public security authorities, with 20 participants involved. Between March 2018 and September 2018, defendant Yang engaged in gambling by playing mahjong and Da A in the single-story house next to the county hospital in a certain county (Qingshuihe county) at a mahjong parlor he operated, where he accumulated a profit of 20,000 RMB. Defendant Yang had previously been administratively punished for gambling by the Public Security Brigade of Hohhot in 2013 and the Chengguan Police Station of a certain county in Qingshuihe in 2014. On December 6, 2018, defendant Yang was apprehended while participating in gambling activities at the mahjong parlor opened by defendant Kang in a certain county. The public prosecution agency submitted evidence to this court including the case registration forms for the crimes of defendants Kang and Yang, household registration documentation, lists of seized items, site inspection records, site diagrams, site photographs, examination records, site detection reports, witness testimonies, and transcripts of the defendants' confessions and defenses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in December 2014, the defendants Lu, Jiang, Duan, and Xu jointly committed burglary in the Jiayuan Community of a certain development zone in the city, with a total of three incidents and a cumulative value of 2,150 RMB.


It has been found through trial that in the early morning of November 24, 2019, defendants Tian and Wang, along with friends, consumed alcohol at the 1839 Bar on Qixin Road, Minhang District, Shanghai. Afterward, the hostess of the bar (the victim), Zhao, accepted an invitation to leave with Tian and Wang to continue drinking and chatting at Tian's residence located at XXX Room, XXX No., Shengxin Road, Juyuan New District, this city. At about 5 a.m., Wang and Tian, under the influence of alcohol, attempted to engage in sexual relations with Zhao (who sustained minor injuries according to the assessment) by slapping her face, restraining her body, and pulling her clothes, but stopped their criminal acts upon Zhao’s resistance. Subsequently, Tian kept Zhao in the room, undressed, exposed his genitalia, and demanded Zhao's cooperation while masturbating until ejaculation. At around 9:50 a.m., Zhao took the opportunity to leave Tian's residence and called "110" to report the incident. Tian and Wang were apprehended by the police in response to the report. After being caught, both defendants confessed to the main criminal facts. Now, their family members have compensated Zhao for her losses and obtained her forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tian and Wang during the court proceedings and are corroborated by evidence including the victim Zhao's statements, the case registration form, identification records, on-site investigation records, search records, list of seized and returned items, collected evidence list, working conditions and screenshot photos, injury examination notice, medical records, inspection reports, appraisal and judicial opinion, relevant receipts and letters of understanding, as well as the defendants' confessions and household registration information, which are sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution alleges that at around 3 p.m. on October 23, 2013, Xu contacted defendant Xiao via SMS to request the purchase of drugs, to which defendant Xiao agreed. Subsequently, defendant Xiao asked her boyfriend, defendant Yu, to contact others by phone to purchase drugs. Defendant Yu, knowing that defendant Xiao intended to sell the drugs, still purchased a packet of drugs from someone else for over 300 RMB and consumed a portion of it. At around 4 p.m. that same day, defendant Xiao took the remaining drugs to the entrance of a restaurant at the back of General Hotel on Jingshan Street in Ouhai District, a certain city, and sold the drugs to Xu for 500 RMB. After the transaction, the police apprehended defendant Xiao at the scene and seized the drugs involved in the transaction and one mobile phone used as a crime tool. Upon analysis, the drugs were found to weigh 0.84 grams and contained methamphetamine. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yu and Xiao during the trial, and they are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Hu, Xu, and Zhou; inspection records; physicochemical test reports; seizure lists and photos; drug custody certificates; call records; explanatory notes; personal safety check registration forms; public security administrative penalty decisions; arrest details; and the defendants' personal information, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On November 16, 2013, the defendant Li, under the instruction of the offender Lin (to be handled separately), introduced the defendant Zhang to work as a waiter at the Little Sheep Restaurant on Renmin South Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, with the intention of stealing others' credit card information. The defendant Li handed the card reader mailed by the offender Lin to the defendant Zhang. During work, the defendant Zhang took the opportunity while customers were paying bills to use the card reader to steal customers' credit card information and recorded the last four digits and withdrawal passwords on a piece of paper. The defendant Li then mailed the card reader with the victims' credit card information copied by the defendant Zhang to Lin. On December 24, 2013, the police arrested the defendants Zhang and Li and found a card reader used for the crime and a piece of paper recording credit card information at the defendant Zhang's residence. Investigation revealed that the defendant Zhang recorded information and passwords of others' credit cards on the paper for a total of 22 accounts, with 5 cardholders confirming the above credit card information. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: one card reader; 2. Documentary evidence: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, recruitment resume, labor contract, courier receipts, paper, credit card information statistics, bank card account opening documents and transaction details, explanation of circumstances, etc.; 3. Witness testimonies: testimonies of witnesses Lin, Lin, Shan, Wan, Li, and Zhu; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Li; 5. Audio-visual materials and electronic data: electronic data of transaction records from the POS terminal involved in the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of May 23, 2016, defendants Sun and Chen went to Dormitory 219, 532, 540, and 546 in the construction workers' dormitory area "Zhongkai City Light" of a town in the city. Using methods such as cutting locks with pliers, they stole one "Samsung" phone (valued at 560 RMB) and a gold ring from Wang, 60 RMB from Bu, 80 RMB from Shao A, and 600 RMB from Shao B, with the total stolen property amounting to 1,300 RMB. After the incident, all losses to the victims were recovered except for the gold ring. After being brought to justice, defendants Sun and Chen confessed truthfully to the above criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Sun and Chen raised no objections to these facts. The statements of victims Wang, Bu, Shao A, and Shao B; the testimony of the witness Jia; identification records; photos; search records; seizure list; seizure records; list of returned items; list of retrieved evidence; audiovisual material descriptions; surveillance videos; price certification report; situation explanations; investigation documentation; arrest records; the confessions of defendants Sun and Chen; criminal judgment; administrative penalty decisions; population information; and criminal personnel information all provide sufficient evidence to support and confirm this court's findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Henan Province charges: On June 12, 2015, at around 17:00, due to an economic dispute, the defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu detained the victim Xu's vehicle, mobile phone, and other items at the east highway entrance of a certain city. They forcibly drove Xu from this city to the downtown area, a certain town, and other places within the city. On June 13, 2015, at around 21:00, near a gas station in the southern area of the city, Xu took the opportunity to escape while using the restroom. The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Henan Province proposes the following sentencing recommendations: Defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, and Bao have confessed and are first-time offenders; it is recommended that each of these defendants be sentenced to three to four months of detention. Defendant Liu surrendered himself and is a first-time offender; it is recommended that he be sentenced to two to three months of detention. The above facts and sentencing recommendations are undisputed by defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu during the court proceedings. These are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu; the statement of the victim Xu; photos; appraisal documents; return certificates; proofs; IOUs; letters of understanding; household registration information; prior conviction proofs; case process records; investigation reports; and other evidence, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: From October 2015 to October 8, 2016, defendants Zhou and Xu lured local residents such as Xu Mou, Pan Mou, and Sang Mou to gather for gambling in the form of "Flipping Huanglong" using hard cards at a shop operated by defendant Xu in Dayun Village, Cangda Road, in a certain town of a certain city. They profited by taking a cut from the gambling. Defendants Zhu and Wu sat at the corner of the table multiple times, managing the funds and gaining profits from it. Investigation revealed that defendants Zhou and Xu illegally gained a total of 20,000 RMB, defendant Zhu gained 7,000 RMB, and defendant Wu gained 3,000 RMB. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu confessed to their crimes truthfully. During the trial, all four defendants prepaid their illegal gains to this court. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu during the court hearing, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu Mou, Pan Mou, and Sang Mou, along with the decisions of public security administrative penalties, lists and photos of seized items, the capture process, and identity proofs of defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Jiangbei District accused: On July 12, 2013, at approximately 1:30 a.m., defendants He, Fang, Jin, and Peng (handled in another case) were drinking and entertaining at Xin Jingu KTV located at No. 4 Zhengda Road in this district. They unjustly assaulted the victim, Lu, who was working on audio control at the KTV, by means of punching, kicking, and hitting with beer bottles. This resulted in the victim suffering a cerebral contusion, right-sided subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and left temporal bone fracture, thus constituting minor injuries.


The prosecution charges that at around midnight on September 8, 2013, defendants Zou and Huang, instigated by accomplices Zou C (already sentenced) and Zou B (handled in another case), along with Fei, Lin, Zou A (all already sentenced), and others, carried weapons such as knives and sticks and broke into the employee dormitory of Lipeng Shoe Factory in District 4 of the Maanqiao Village, Hengfeng Street, of a certain city. There, they assaulted the victim, Deng, causing him serious injury. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence to this court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: 1. Around 18:00 on a day in late August 2014, defendants Huang and Zhang, after premeditating, went to an open area by a bridge in a village of a certain town in the county. Defendant Zhang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Huang stole a blue "Fengfan" brand electric tricycle parked there by Chen. According to an appraisal, the tricycle was valued at 3,676 RMB. 2. At around 22:00 on September 2, 2014, defendants Huang and Zhang, after premeditating, went to an alley near a factory at 168 New Street, Linqu, Kunyang Town in the county. Defendant Zhang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Huang stole a purple "Qilekang" brand electric tricycle parked there by Wang. According to an appraisal, the tricycle was valued at 1,075 RMB. After the crime, the two stolen electric tricycles were recovered and returned to their original owners. Additionally, it was found that after defendant Huang was brought to justice, he assisted the public security organs in capturing another perpetrator. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Zhang during the court trial, and are supported by their previous confessions, the statements of the victims Chen and Wang, testimony from the witness Wei, on-site inspection records, search records, identification records, price appraisal documents, seizure decision and lists, evidence retrieval notices, return lists, household registration information, details of capture, explanatory notes, and criminal judgment documents, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate charged that on June 14, 2016, at around 11 am, defendants Zhang and Gu went to a clothing wholesale market in a certain district of a certain city and stole a pair of men's leather shoes, a women's top, a pair of women's underwear, and a pair of women's trousers. According to an appraisal, the stolen items were valued at 158 RMB. On June 22, 2016, at around 10 am, Zhang and Gu stole three men's T-shirts, a pair of women's leather shoes, and a women's coat from the same location. The appraisal valued these stolen items at 318 RMB. On a day in mid to late June 2016, Zhang stole four men's T-shirts from the same place. The appraisal valued these items at 280 RMB. On June 27, 2016, at around 10 am, Zhang and Gu were caught red-handed by the staff while stealing at the same location. Zhang participated in thefts 4 times, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 756 RMB, while Gu participated in thefts 3 times, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 476 RMB. The public prosecution agency provided to this court documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the defendants' confessions and defenses; appraisals; audio-visual materials, electronic data and other records to support their charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of the Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: 1. At approximately 3 a.m. on June 17, 2014, defendants Ya and Luo, along with another individual, went to Room xx, Unit x, Building ××, ×× Community, Yu×× District, a certain city. The other individual unlocked the door of the residence of the victim, Lu Moumou, using a shim. Ya entered and committed theft while Luo kept watch, stealing 200 Hong Kong dollars, of which 100 Hong Kong dollars have been recovered, and the remainder was squandered. 2. At approximately 5 a.m. on June 17, 2014, defendants Ya and Luo, along with another individual, went to Room xx, Unit x, Building ××, a community in a certain district of a city. The other individual unlocked the door of the home of the victim, Chen Mou, using a shim. Ya entered the room to carry out the theft while Luo kept watch, stealing 500 yuan in cash and a Samsung cellphone. The Samsung cellphone was taken by the third individual, and the cash was completely squandered. In summary, defendants Ya and Luo committed residential burglary twice. After investigation and surveillance, public security personnel apprehended defendants Ya and Luo on June 23, 2014, in a city of a certain region. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Ya and Luo during the trial and are supported by the following evidence presented in court: the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the certificate of compulsory measures, the seizure list, statements from the victims Lu Moumou and Chen Mou, confession materials from defendants Ya and Luo; the identification records and photos of defendants Ya and Luo, the price appraisal report and the appraisal opinion notification, the detailed report and related statements of solving the case, and the household registration certificates of defendants Ya and Luo. The facts of this case are clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient, and it is enough to establish a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that, starting in 2012, the defendant Yang received bets for the Mark Six lottery from the defendant Zheng via telephone and settled funds through bank transfers. Beginning in March 2014, the defendant Zheng received Mark Six lottery bets from individuals such as Dong and others through telephone, SMS, and WeChat at his home at 135 Puxi Street, Jiangbei Subdistrict, in a certain county, and reported them to defendant Yang, making a profit from the rebate difference. By the time defendant Zheng was apprehended by police on September 28, 2014, he had received Mark Six lottery bets totaling more than 110,000 yuan, and defendant Yang had received bets totaling approximately 290,000 yuan. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence for the facts alleged above.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On the evening of March 26, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, without approval, unlawfully brought chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village, a town in a certain city, to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. Afterwards, Peng drove a truck with license plate AXXXXX from a certain place to transport the felled trees to a town in a certain city, selling them to Lin Moujia, the owner of a local timber processing factory, at a price of 20 yuan per 100 jin. On the evening of March 27, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, and Li carried chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. Afterwards, Peng drove the truck from a certain place to transport the felled trees to the town, selling them to Lin Moujia at the same price. On March 28, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, and Li once again carried chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. The three were later caught by local villagers and handed over to the public security authorities. According to the appraisal by the Fujian Nanfang Judicial Appraisal Center, the total standing stock volume of the aforementioned felled trees was 16.8113 cubic meters, with a value of 6,270.17 yuan; among them, the standing stock volume of trees felled on March 27 and March 28, 2016, was 9.7934 cubic meters, valued at 3,803.49 yuan. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented corresponding evidence to the court through evidence presentation and cross-examination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that at approximately 12:50 a.m. on August 24, 2014, the defendant Zhang, in collaboration with the defendant Du, Meng A (deceased), and Meng B (handled in a separate case), had a conflict with a resident of a certain township in a certain county named Chen due to a trivial matter while eating at a barbecue stand across from the Shengshi Cake Shop in Yong'an Community, a certain town. They then jointly assaulted Chen. On December 15, 2014, the county's First People's Hospital Forensic Identification Institute assessed that Chen sustained minor injuries of the second degree. The facts determined by this court's trial are consistent with the facts charged by the prosecution and are corroborated by evidence, including confessions by defendants Zhang and Du, statements by the victim Chen, testimonies from witnesses Liu, Dong, Wang, Lei, and Jiang, an explanatory note, a death certificate, injury photos of Chen, a household registration certificate, an expert opinion, identification records, the case source, the process of apprehension, a mediation agreement, a receipt, inquiry transcripts, and an investigation and evaluation opinion document.


The prosecution alleges that on May 21, 2016, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Ji and Ma conspired together in Room 205 of a certain hotel on Fengshan Street in this city to purchase 5 small packets of heroin from an unknown woman for 2,000 RMB. On the 23rd of the same month, at around 10:00 PM, defendants Ji and Ma conspired together in the aforementioned Room 205 to sell one of the small packets of heroin to a person referred to as Hei A for 340 RMB. After purchasing the heroin, Hei A consumed part of the drugs on-site in the aforesaid Room 205, and kept the remaining heroin in his clothing pocket. On the same day, police officers apprehended defendants Ji, Ma, and Hei A on-site in Room 205 and discovered 6 small packets of heroin (with a net weight of 3.3158 grams) and 340 RMB in defendant Ji's bag, as well as 1 small packet of heroin (with a net weight of 0.0706 grams) in the possession of Hei A. An evaluation confirmed that the confiscated substances contained heroin. During the trial, defendants Ji and Ma did not dispute these facts and there is sufficient corroboration from documents such as the seizure warrant, seizure list, temporary receipt for funds, narcotics handover list, photographs, administrative penalty decision, population information, "account of the arrest," witness testimony from Hei, inspection certificate and records, identification record and photos, physicochemical examination report, and the on-site testing report.


The prosecution agency charges that in May 2016, the defendants Qin and Tang, together with Zhang and Deng, jointly purchased the eucalyptus trees from the "Mahuangtang" mountain field in Zhupinglong Village, a township of a certain city, which were contracted by Huang A and five others, for a price of 180,000 yuan. In March 2017, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, the defendants Qin and Tang hired Liang and four others to partially cut down the eucalyptus trees in the mountain field. The timber was sold in five separate transactions to the Zhongfang Taige Lin Paper Mill, yielding a total of 20,933 yuan from the sales. According to an assessment, 669 eucalyptus trees with a standing timber volume of 37 cubic meters were cut down in the "Mahuangtang" mountain field in Zhupinglong Village. After the incident, the two defendants voluntarily surrendered to the public security authority and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts of illegal logging. The facts of the above charges were not disputed by defendants Qin and Tang during the court hearing. Supporting evidence includes household registration and resident information, explanations of voluntary surrender, the Zhongfang County Taige Lin Paper Mill timber sales registration form, receipts, forest, forest tree, and forest land status registration form, boundary map of forest, forest tree, and forest land, certification from the city's Forest Resource Management Station, forest land lease contract, community correction investigation and assessment report, testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Deng, Huang, Li 1, Qin 2, Bao, Yang, Qin 3, Liang, Liang 2, Zheng, Li 2, and Tang, site inspection records, schematic diagrams, and onsite photos from the public security authority, and the forestry forensic appraisal report by the Huaihua Xingri Judicial Appraisal Institute, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that at noon on December 1, 2015, the defendants Ying, Chou got into a dispute over business-related trivialities with the victim Qian, who was at a neighboring stall in front of stalls 6-7 at the Dongliu market for fresh produce in the Jiangdong District of this city. This led to a physical altercation, during which the defendants Ying, Chou injured the victim Qian. Forensic evaluation determined that the victim Qian suffered fractures to the right 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th ribs due to the trauma, with chest injuries reaching the level of minor injury of the first degree. Additionally, it has been found that the defendant Ying was summoned to the case on January 12, 2016, and defendant Chou on January 13, 2016. After the incident, defendant Chou reached a settlement with the victim Qian and agreed to civil compensation, and the victim also requested leniency for both defendants. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Qian's statement and identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Wang, Xie, Xu, and Ding, the settlement agreement, hospital medical records, details of the defendants' appearance in court, household registration certificates of Ying and Chou, video discs, and the forensic assessment of bodily injuries, sufficient to confirm the facts.


The prosecution alleges that on a day around April 26 or 27, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang, along with Guo (already convicted) and others, stole mobile power banks and other items in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. On a day around April 29, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang stole 6 memory cards and 1 mobile power bank in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. At around 4 a.m. on April 30, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang, along with Guo and others, stole headphones, mobile power banks, and other mobile accessories in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the total value of the above-mentioned items was 10,778 yuan. Two headphones, one Bluetooth earphone splitter, and one data cable stolen by the defendant Wang were seized and returned to the victim unit. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Tian and Wang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Feng; the confession of the co-defendant Guo; the No. 189 appraisal conclusion certificate (2013) by Shen from the Price Appraisal Center of a district in a certain city; the recognition record; the seizure list and return list; photos of physical evidence; screenshots of surveillance footage; the detailed list of stolen items; audiovisual materials; the criminal judgment; population information sheet; phone inquiry records; case source; and confession materials and other evidence, sufficient to establish the allegation.