After trial, it was found that: 1. On the evening of October 7, 2013, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of "San Gong," making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. 2. On the evening of the 9th of the same month, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of "San Gong," making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. 3. On the evening of the 10th of the same month, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of "San Gong," making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. It was also found that after defendant Qiao was brought to justice, he truthfully confessed his crimes and contacted his brother Qiao A by phone to persuade defendant Yang to surrender. Subsequently, defendant Yang surrendered at the Zhongdai Police Station of the Pinghu City Public Security Bureau on March 7, 2014. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by defendants Qiao and Yang during the trial, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, the criminal judgment, situation explanations, capture process, and identification documents, which are sufficient for the finding.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: 1. On a day in July 2014, defendant Liu allowed Liu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. 2. On September 11, 2014, defendant Liu allowed Liu and Cheng to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room 611 of GreenTree Inn, located at the intersection of a certain road and Jinsan Road in a certain district of a certain city. 3. On a day in early September 2014, defendant Cheng allowed Liu and Wang to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. 4. On September 10, 2014, defendant Cheng allowed Liu to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. In response to the above charges, the public prosecution agency presented evidence to the court, including witness testimonies, the confessions of the defendants, and related documentary evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a district in a certain city charged that at around 4 a.m. on April 27, 2016, the defendants Hao and Zhang took advantage of the absence of people to steal an electric tricycle worth 1,600 yuan, which was parked by the victim, Bian, in front of the lottery shop at the east gate of the Jingmo Shuxiang Yayuan residential community in a district of a certain city.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou accused: On the evening of July 22, 2014, at around 10 pm, the defendants Wen and Xu, along with others, were drinking near the Northeast Specialty BBQ Restaurant on Crescent Road in Triangle Village, Qiaosi Street, a district in Hangzhou. Without cause, they surrounded the victim Zhang's white Beijing Hyundai Elantra, license plate "Zhe A×××××". They forcibly compelled the victim Zhang to exit the vehicle by methods such as banging on the car. During this incident, the defendant Xu climbed onto the roof of the car and smashed the sunroof. Fearing physical assault, the victim Zhang abandoned the car and fled. Subsequently, the defendants Wen, Xu, and others used methods such as kicking and hitting with sticks to damage the car's front and rear windshields, the right rear window, hood, and trunk. According to an assessment, the value of the damaged property amounted to RMB 6,220. After the incident, defendants Xu and Xiong have compensated the victim Zhang with RMB 50,000 and obtained his understanding.


Upon investigation, it was found that from September 2011 to October 2012, the defendants Li and Cao conspired in advance to organize gambling activities. They set up a gaming room near the old grain and oil station in Nanxun Town, a certain district of this city, where they organized participants, including Deng, Hong, Chen, Xu, and others, to gamble in the form of "Er Ba Gang." They took a commission of 10% of the winnings from the bank, totaling 300,000 RMB. After the incident, the defendant Cao voluntarily went to the public security authorities to surrender and truthfully confessed his crimes. The facts above were not disputed by the defendants Li and Cao during the trial. The evidence, including household registration certificates, public security administrative penalty decision documents, revocation of public security administrative penalty decision documents, explanatory notes, testimonies from witnesses Deng, Hong, Chen, Xu, and others, as well as the circumstances of the arrest, sufficiently supports these findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In October 2011, the defendant Wang, despite knowing it might be stolen property, purchased a used Santana 2000 sedan with military license plates for 8,500 yuan from others. Subsequently, the defendant Ning, also knowing it might be stolen property, bought the car from Wang for 13,500 yuan. Later, the car was seized by the police. Investigation revealed that the car was indeed stolen. It was further found that after investigators discovered that the Santana driven by Ning's father (referred to as Ning's father A) was stolen, the vehicle was detained. Later, defendant Ning turned himself in at the Pengyang police station of the Zhoucun branch of Zibo Public Security Bureau, while defendant Wang was apprehended by the investigating authorities. The involved Santana 2000 sedan (engine number 651769) was seized by the investigative authorities and returned to the victim. The defendants Wang and Ning raised no objections during the trial regarding these facts, which were confirmed by evidence such as the vehicle sales agreement, testimonies from witnesses including Li, statements from the victim Qu, and confessions from the defendants Wang and Ning, sufficient to establish these facts.


The prosecution alleges: At approximately 5 a.m. on June 25, 2016, the defendants Chen and Xu, while staying at the dormitory located at Room 403, Building 4, Area A, Nanyou, Jiannan Road, Nanshan District, a certain city, acted as lookouts for each other. Chen stole a mobile OPPO phone from their roommate, the victim Deng, while Xu stole an iPhone 6 from another roommate, the victim Liu, and then they fled the scene. At around 9 a.m. on the same day, Chen and Xu sold the stolen iPhone 6 to an individual named Ma for RMB 1,250. At around 4 p.m. on the same day, Chen and Xu were arrested at Room 205, Jiahua Hotel, Xinwei Community, Baoan District, a certain city, and the stolen OPPO mobile phone was also recovered. On June 29 of the same year, with Chen's cooperation, the stolen iPhone 6 was retrieved. According to the appraisal, the stolen iPhone 6 was valued at 2,655 yuan, the OPPO mobile phone at 2,570 yuan, and the OPPO phone case at 25 yuan, totaling 5,250 yuan. On July 14, 2016, the defendant Xu received forgiveness from the victims Deng and Liu. The facts above, which the defendants Chen and Xu did not dispute during the court hearing, are supported by evidence such as photographs of the stolen mobile phones, explanations of the arrest process, explanations of the retrieval process, seizure decision and list, return list, evidence material acceptance list, letters of forgiveness, identity materials of the defendants, testimony of witness Ma, statements from the victims Deng and Liu, the price appraisal report of the involved properties in a certain city, the scene inspection transcript, the identification transcript of witness Ma, search record, and confessions and defenses of the defendants Chen and Xu, all of which have been verified to be true and are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges that, on the early morning of January 27, 2013, the defendants Chen and Wu, along with Wang Yi (handled in a separate case), Wang Jia (handled in a separate case), and others, were having a late night barbecue at a street stall at the entrance of a commercial city in a certain district, Pinghu Street. During the meal, due to an issue with the volume of noise, the victim Diao, who was seated at the adjacent table, smashed a beer bottle on the ground near Wang Jia, with some fragments hitting Wang Jia. This led to a verbal altercation between the two parties, after which Wang Jia and others left the scene. After leaving, Wang Jia called on Wang Yi and the defendants Chen and Wu, and they retrieved metal pipes from the factory dormitory, returning to the barbecue stall to assault the victim Diao, causing multiple injuries to Diao's head and other areas. The public security authorities arrived at the scene following a report and apprehended the defendants Chen and Wu. According to an assessment, the injuries sustained by the victim Diao resulted in an open fracture of the right temporoparietal bone and rupture of the dura mater, with the injuries assessed as severe. After the incident, the families of Wang Yi, Wang Jia, and the defendant Wu reached a settlement agreement with the victim Diao, compensating the victim Diao for losses with 80,000 RMB. The victim issued a letter of understanding, expressing forgiveness for the actions of the defendants Chen and Wu, and stated they would no longer pursue criminal responsibility against them. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Chen and Wu during the court proceedings and are substantiated by evidence including the capture process, the criminal case settlement agreement, the defendants' identity information, testimonies of witnesses Li, Wang Jia, and Wang Yi, the victim Diao's statement, the confessions of the defendants Chen and Wu, the forensic medical injury assessment report, and the on-site inspection records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: On August 17, 2019, at approximately 10 p.m., the defendants Zhou and Chen, after drinking, were at Xiu Mai KTV, located at No. XXX Miaojing Road, New Town, in the same district. They went to watch officers of the Police Station of a certain area under the Pudong Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, including Officer Yao, handling a dispute. When Officer Yao advised them to leave, defendant Zhou did not comply and interfered with Officer Yao's law enforcement. Officer Yao then orally summoned him, during which defendants Zhou and Chen pushed and pulled Officer Yao, causing him injury. When reinforcing officers, including Guo, arrived, they attempted to remove defendant Zhou but were met with resistance, resulting in injury. According to the assessment: Yao suffered soft tissue contusion in the right forearm due to external force, constituting a minor injury; Guo sustained multiple soft tissue injuries due to external force, which did not constitute a minor injury. On the same day, defendants Chen and Zhou were apprehended by public security authorities and confessed truthfully to the aforementioned criminal facts upon arrival in custody. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhou during the trial. Additionally, the public prosecution authority provided evidence, confirmed as truthful through court examination, including the confession records of defendant Chen, the statements of the victims Yao and Guo, injury notification, injury assessment reports, witness testimonies from Mao, Yan, Jiang, and Cao, site surveillance video, law enforcement recorder video, evidence reception list from the public security authority, police certificate, situation explanations, identity information, and the process of the crime and arrest, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that between October and November 2014, the defendants, Tong and Zhu, took items from the Baitang branch of Liaoning Yonghui Supermarket Co., Ltd., located at No. 15 Yangtze Street, Huanggu District, a certain city. They placed the items inside their own bags and left the supermarket through a non-shopping route, stealing Snickers peanut chocolates and other items (with a total value of RMB 940.02) on three separate occasions. The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds squandered. It was further found that when Tong was being investigated for suspected drug use, he voluntarily confessed to the theft and assisted the police in capturing his accomplice, Zhu. During the trial, both defendants actively returned all the stolen funds, totaling 940 yuan. Tong and Zhu had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, which were supported by the testimony of the witness Bai, the criminal judgment and release documents, identification records and photographs, price appraisal report, phone inquiry records and population information, the case source, and the details of the capture. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on June 17, 2020, defendants Jiang and Yang, among others, were drinking and singing in Room 212 of the Ruiru Mansion KTV at XXX Minjing Road in a certain district of this city. Defendant Jiang got into an argument with the victim, Lou, who came to offer a toast. Jiang twice struck Lou with a wine bottle. After Sun and Lou left the room, the victim Dong, who was with Lou, entered Room 212. Jiang mistakenly thought Dong came to fight and thus struck Dong's head with a wine bottle and pursued him with Yang outside the room into the corridor. Afterwards, Jiang and Yang were persuaded to return to the room by others. Later, when Lou entered Room 212 again, Jiang assaulted Lou, and Yang hit Lou on the head with a wine bottle upon seeing this. Together, they punched and kicked Lou. The forensic examination determined that Lou's facial soft tissue injuries, facial skin abrasions, right eye contusions, and limb soft tissue injuries were all classified as minor injuries, with an overall assessment of minor injury; Dong's scalp wound, facial skin abrasions, and facial skin scratches were also classified as minor injuries, with an overall assessment of minor injury. On September 9, 2020, defendants Yang and Jiang were separately apprehended by the police and brought to justice. Both of them truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts upon arrival. The defendants Jiang and Yang, along with their defense counsel, raised no objections during the trial to these facts, which were confirmed through the victims Lou and Dong's statements and identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Sun and Liu, testimonies of witnesses Song, Tang, and Li, evidence retrieval notices and lists, surveillance videos, law enforcement recorder videos and screenshots, injury examination notice and hospital examination records, judicial identification statement from the Marine Biological Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Judicial Identification Institute, case explanation provided by the Marine Police Bureau Changhai Road Police Station, and defendants Jiang and Yang's confessions and identification records, which provided sufficient evidence for conviction. During the trial, defendants Jiang and Yang, with the help of their relatives, compensated the victims Lou and Dong and received their understanding.


The prosecution agency charges that defendants Yang and Wu agreed to sell drugs for profit. At around 3 p.m. on April 26, 2014, defendant Yang collected two small packets of the drug ketamine, with a total weight of 1.32 grams, from defendant Wu. Later, at the entrance of Jinkeda Plastic Co., Ltd. in Zhangcha District, a certain city, Yang sold the aforementioned ketamine to Xie for 200 RMB. After the transaction was completed, they were apprehended by police. The police recovered 200 RMB in drug money and a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from defendant Yang at the scene, and two small packets of ketamine involved in the transaction were recovered from Xie. Subsequently, with the assistance of defendant Yang, the police arrested defendant Wu near a staff dormitory building at Meijia Decoration Center on Fenglin Road in a certain district of a certain city, and seized a small packet of ketamine weighing 0.85 grams and a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from Wu. The above facts were acknowledged without objection by defendants Yang and Wu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Xie, identification records, photographs, seizure decrees, inventory lists, mobile phone call records, forensic examination reports, the arrest reports, household registration certificates, and confessions and identification records and photographs of defendants Yang and Wu during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 8:00 a.m. on April 13, 2016, defendants Jin and Kong boarded a westbound educational line bus in this city. When the bus was near the Nanshaomen stop, Kong was responsible for blocking the victim Ma's view with his body, while Jin took advantage of Ma's inattention to reach into Ma's shoulder bag and steal 530 yuan. The two were immediately apprehended by officers from the second squad of the Public Transport Division of the Xi'an Municipal Public Security Bureau, who were on the same bus. At the scene, 530 yuan was recovered from the right side of Jin's waist. After the case was solved, the stolen cash was returned to the victim. The evidence establishing the above facts includes: 1. The case registration form and report materials from the public security agency; 2. A certificate of the arrest process issued by the public security agency; 3. The statement of the victim, Ma; 4. The testimony of witness Fan; 5. Identification and pointing ou


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges: 1. One day in January 2017, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 250 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, a district in Hangzhou. 2. On the afternoon of January 27 of the same year, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Lai for 200 yuan downstairs of Building 2, Unit 2, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. 3. On the afternoon of February 19 of the same year, defendants Li and Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 300 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. 4. On the night of February 21, 2017, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 300 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. The evidence used to support the charges includes witness testimonies, documentary evidence, retrieval records, and the defendants' confessions and defenses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged: At approximately 21:41 on December 26, 2017, at a barbecue place in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district, Wang, Zhang, Fa, Ding, and others were drinking and being too loud, which led to a dispute with the neighboring table of Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, another Han, and others. Subsequently, the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han assaulted Wang, Zhang, Fa, and Ding, causing injuries to the four. Upon assessment, Wang’s facial abrasion was considered a minor injury, and Fa’s left brow wound was also considered a minor injury. On January 17, 2018, the families of the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han compensated the victims Wang and the other three with a total of 25,000 yuan, and the victims forgave the defendants' criminal actions. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhu argued: 1. The victims were at fault for the occurrence of the incident; 2. The defendant Zhu compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their forgiveness; 3. The defendant Zhu truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. In summary, it is recommended to apply probation to defendant Zhu. Upon trial, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People’s Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city were true. It was additionally found that this case was reported by the victims. Defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, and Shen were apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Han surrendered voluntarily. After being brought to justice, defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han all truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. These facts were acknowledged by the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han during the court hearing, and are sufficiently substantiated by documentary evidence such as receipts, letters of forgiveness, witness testimonies, expert opinions, victim statements by Chen, and defendants' confessions, enough to establish the verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On February 22, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., south of the intersection of Housuo Street and Anqiu Lane in Kuiwen District, Weifang City, Zhang (dealt with in a separate case), suspecting that he had left his wallet containing 5,000 yuan in cash in the taxi driven by Li, license plate Lu G×××××, gathered the defendants Qu, Wen, and Jiang (dealt with in a separate case), among others, to beat Li with wooden sticks and smash the taxi's windows after Li denied it and suggested calling the police. This resulted in injuries to Li and damage to the taxi valued at 5,100 yuan. According to the appraisal, the victim Li suffered external injuries to the head, face, and shoulder, causing multiple soft tissue contusions and fractures of the left eye socket's lower and lateral walls, constituting minor injuries (Grade 1). In response to the above criminal charges, the prosecution has provided the following evidence to the court: documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, expert opinions, identification records, and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 1:00 a.m. on May 15, 2014, the defendant Zhou drove his Chang'an van with license plate number SuM××××× along with defendant Shen to a sheep pen at the home of Lu in a certain city. Taking advantage of the opportunity, they stole 17 goats and later transported them to Zhou's sheep pen in a certain town of the same city. According to the appraisal, the 17 goats were valued at 11,526 yuan RMB. After the incident, defendants Shen and Zhou truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Zhou's wife compensated the victim Lu with 18,200 yuan RMB. During the court trial, defendants Zhou and Shen did not contest these facts, which were corroborated by the victim Lu's statement, testimonies from witnesses Shao and Chen, identification records, site investigation records and photographs, a situation explanation issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the price assessment conclusion, the case reporting and solving process issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and Criminal Judgment No. 261 (1994) Dongxinchuzi from this court, among other evidence. The evidence was verified in court and is sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The prosecution alleges that from 2015 to December 25, 2016, the defendant Yang, without a tobacco retail license, sold cigarettes multiple times to the defendant Liu via QQ, involving an amount of 52,305 yuan. Since 2015, the defendant Liu, also without a tobacco retail license, repeatedly purchased cigarettes from the defendant Yang through QQ and then resold them at a markup through WeChat Moments to WeChat friends, including Wang, Zhao, Liu A, among others, involving an amount of 53,760 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Yang during the trial. There is documentary evidence, including the statement of case resolution, online chat records, Alipay transaction details, seizure lists, certifications, phone inquiry records, and household registration documents issued by the Zibo Public Security Bureau Daqiao Police Station for defendant Liu, and by the Dongning Public Security Bureau Guangming Police Station for defendant Yang. Additionally, testimonies from witnesses such as Wang and Li, among others, corroborate the facts, providing sufficient grounds for the determination.


Upon examination, it has been found that on the afternoon of January 7, 2015, defendants Liu and He went near the side entrance of Hailin Grocery Store at the Pingnan Town Agricultural Market in a certain county. There, they discovered a red Pearl River motorcycle (license plate number Gui R×××××, valued at 2,360 RMB) belonging to the victim, Ye Mou Yi, which was left unlocked. Seizing the opportunity when no one was paying attention, the two defendants stole the motorcycle. After the crime, the police seized the involved motorcycle and returned it to the victim Ye Mou Yi upon solving the case. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and He during the court hearing. Additionally, evidence such as testimonies from witnesses Lu and Ye Mou Jia, statements from victim Ye Mou Yi, site inspection records, site diagrams and photographs, identification records and photographs, certain exhibits, lists of seized and returned items, price appraisal opinions, lists of received evidence, arrest records, household registration certificates, this court's criminal verdicts (Ping Criminal Trial No. 330 of 2011 and No. 33 of 2014), County Detention Center's certificate of release, Yizhou Prison's release certificate, and SkyNet video screenshots have verified and are sufficient for establishing the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged: On June 26, 2016, at around 10 PM, employees of the management office of Zhu Sheng Garden in the Futian District of this city, Ma and Yang, along with defendants Fang and Huang, had a dispute and physical altercation with employees of the Givenchy Beauty and Hair Salon, including Xu and others, due to the salon's unsanitary conditions. Police officers arrived at the scene to defuse the conflict and took some individuals back to the police station for investigation. Later, defendants Fang and Huang returned to the Givenchy Beauty Salon and engaged in a physical conflict with employees of the salon. Outnumbered, Fang and Huang were forced to retreat outside the store, then Fang returned with a kitchen knife, and the two charged back into the store to chase and attack the others. Salon employee Zhang attempted to seize the knife and suffered a cut on the left hand. During the physical altercation, Zhang also sustained a comminuted fracture at the base of the fifth metacarpal of the right hand, as well as dislocation of the hamate-metacarpal joint with soft tissue injury, which was assessed as minor injury level two. The police arrived after receiving the report and arrested defendants Fang and Huang. Later, defendants Fang and Huang reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhang and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The prosecution presented evidence in court, including the kitchen knife involved in the case (photo); documen


The prosecution alleges that around 2 a.m. on December 18, 2012, the defendants Song, Liu, and Li, along with Luo (handled in a separate case), conspired in advance and drove to Yang's slicing factory in Yang Village, Qiucun Town, Fenghua City. Defendant Liu acted as a lookout and provided support outside while defendants Song, Li and Luo entered the factory by climbing the walls and prying the windows. They stole 600 kilograms of rare earth, valued at 24,000 RMB, which Yang had stored in the factory, using rubber bags for transport. After the incident, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants Song, Liu, and Li had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Yang's statement, witness Chen's testimony, the price appraisal conclusion, identification records and photos, temporary seizure receipts and return certificates, the criminal judgment, the details of the case processing, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the guilt.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province charges that from the second half of 2011 to May 2013, defendants Chen and Liao, in their rented home at No. 284 Guangming New Village, in a certain street of a certain district, used computers and the Alibaba online platform to place orders, purchasing clothing with counterfeit "JEEP" trademarks in bulk at low prices from suppliers. They then sold these items through their online stores "World Taste" and "High Style" on Taobao, with total sales amounting to RMB 107,687, resulting in illegal profits of approximately RMB 40,000. On May 13, 2013, the police seized an additional 150 cotton jackets, 785 pairs of pants, 1,124 casual jackets, and 60 shirts bearing the "JEEP" trademark that had not yet been sold, from their rental location. Appraisal confirmed that these seized goods were all infringing items with counterfeit "JEEP" trademarks, with a total value of approximately RMB 300,000. It was also found that on November 12, 2013, the Zhenhai Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce imposed an administrative penalty on Chen and Liao for selling items with counterfeit "JEEP" trademarks, confiscating 150 cotton jackets, 785 pairs of pants, 1,124 casual jackets, and 60 shirts marked with the "JEEP" trademark, and fines amounting to RMB 266,892. Defendants Chen and Liao have already paid a fine of RMB 50,000. During the court hearing, defendants Chen and Liao did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by documentary evidence such as the defendants' identity information, the arrest process, the confiscation list, transaction details, power of attorney, trademark registration certificate, trademark transfer approval, trademark change approval, trademark renewal approval, the administrative penalty decision from the Zhenhai Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce, appraisal opinions, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on the night of September 29, 2013, the defendants Ding and Guan conspired in advance to enter Shaoxing Sanpeng Knitting Co., Ltd., located in a town of a certain district of a certain city, through a window. They stole an HP computer (including a monitor) valued at 2,280 RMB and a Lenovo Jiayue computer (excluding a monitor) valued at 1,805 RMB. On February 11, 2015, at around 12:30 p.m., defendant Ding was apprehended by the police at the entrance of Dongjiang Community in a town of a certain district of a certain city. On the same year, March 11, at around 10:00 p.m., defendant Guan was apprehended by the police in room 321 of the Sihai Business Hotel, Changjiang Road, Changshu City, of a certain province. After the crime, the stolen goods were not recovered. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Guan during the court hearing and are supported by the testimony of witness Huang, the price appraisal report, fingerprint identification report, on-site inspection records, description of the arrest process, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the facts. Other criminal activities of defendants Ding and Guan are confirmed by criminal judgment No. 72 and No. 878 of 2014 of Ningbo Yinzhou District People's Court of a certain province, criminal ruling No. 61 of 2014 of the Zhejiang Ningbo Intermediate People's Court, and certificates of release after serving their sentences.


After the trial, it was found that from November 24 to December 1, 2012, the defendants Cai and Dong, together with Chen A, Lu XX (both have been sentenced), and others including "Ji XX" organized gambling activities in the form of Pai Gow at Jin'ou Hotel in Lucheng District, and Dong'ou Hotel in Wutian Street, Ouhai District in a certain city, benefiting from taking cuts. More than 20 people participated in the gambling. Wang B (already sentenced) acted as the manager inside the casino, while Xu B and Xu A (both have been sentenced) kept watch for the casino. At about 19:00 on December 1, 2012, the casino was raided by the police, who seized one set of dominoes, unattended gambling funds amounting to 26,630 RMB, and a pair of walkie-talkies at the scene. On January 9, 2014, defendants Cai and Dong voluntarily surrendered themselves to the police and truthfully confessed their own criminal facts and those of their accomplices. The above facts were uncontested by defendants Cai and Dong during the trial, and were corroborated by the confessions of accomplices Xu B, Chen A, Lu XX, Wang B, and Xu A; testimonies of witnesses Huang, Liu, Jiang, Wang A, Wei XX, Li Jia, Liu, Chen, Wang C, Zhu, Guo, Jiang, Fang, Sun, and Li Yi; identification records; lists and photographs of seized items; site photos; case summary; criminal judgments of accomplices; identification materials of the two defendants, among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Baotou City charged that on the evening of August 17, 2019, defendants Liu, Li, and Ma (dealt with in a separate case) went to a karaoke venue in a certain district after drinking to sing. During this time, defendants Liu, Li, and Ma randomly attacked KTV staff members, namely the victims Gao, Xu, Niu, and Yuan, causing multiple injuries to their bodies. According to the forensic assessment, the injuries sustained by victims Gao and Xu were classified as minor injuries. After the victims reported to the police, officers Ling and Qiao, along with auxiliary police officers Wang, Ru, and Gao from a local police station, arrived at the scene of the incident. Defendants Li and Ma continued to assault victims Gao and Xu. When the police officers attempted to intervene, defendants Li and Ma insulted and grabbed them, resulting in various injuries to responding officers Ling, Ru, Gao, and Wang. The police brought defendants Liu, Li, and Ma back to the station for questioning and allowed their families to take them home afterward. Once the case was transferred to the criminal investigation team, the public security authorities notified defendants Li and Liu by phone to come to the public security agency for investigation, to which they voluntarily complied. In response to the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented photographs showing the victims' injuries, basic information on the permanent residents, details of the incident's reporting, filing, investigation process, the criminal judgments and administrative penalty decisions for defendants Li and Liu, materials regarding the police measures taken against defendant Ma, explanatory notes from public security organs, testimonies from witnesses Tong and Qiao, statements from victims Gao, Xu, Ru, Ling, Wang, and Gao, confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Liu, forensic body injury assessment reports numbered [2019] 31 and [2019] 32 from the Certain District Branch of Baotou Public Security Bureau's Department of Criminal Forensic Science, identification records of defendants Li, Liu, and victims Gao and Xu, and surveillance video from the crime scene as evidence.


The prosecution alleges: On September 10, 2014, at around 10:00 a.m., the defendants Li and Liang, together with Liang Wen, Liang Ai, Liang Guo, Liang Sheng, Zhou Ming (all of whom have been sentenced), and Huang Cong (handled in a separate case), Liang Wu, Li Long, "Boss Hong," "Big-bellied Lin," "Thin Ghost" (handled in another case), and more than ten others, successively went to the sales office of Zhonghao Real Estate Company (hereinafter referred to as Zhonghao Company), located at No. 9, Green Island Plaza, Green Island Street, Encheng, a certain city. Inside the sales office and on the street outside, they randomly assaulted Zhonghao Company personnel and damaged items on site. As a result, the victims Luo, X, and X were injured (all of whom were diagnosed as having minor injuries by forensic identification), and items such as mobile phones, desks, fans, and wooden doors at the scene were damaged (the total value of the damaged items was appraised to be 2,608.48 RMB).


Upon examination, it was found that on June 25, 2013, defendants Han and Xu, along with X County resident Li, and residents Zhao and Zheng from a certain district, went for entertainment in a private room on the second floor of "XXXX" KTV in X County. At the same time, residents Li Jia, Zhang, and Zhang from a certain district were also at the KTV on the third floor in room "888." Later, Zhang met Li in the hallway and invited Li, Han, Xu, Zhao, and others to join the entertainment in room "888." During the entertainment, Li Jia and Zhao began to argue and subsequently fought physically. Xu, Han, and others assisted Zhao, while Zhang and others assisted Li Jia, resulting in mutual physical assault. After the KTV lobby manager Sun persuaded them, Xu called Han, Zhao, and others out of the room to go downstairs, with Li Jia, Zhang, Li, Shi, and others following behind. Upon seeing Zheng resting on the stairs, Li Jia and others initiated an assault on Zheng using bottles or physically attacking him. Xu witnessed this and ran into the BBQ restaurant "XX" in a trade city, grabbed a kitchen knife from the back preparation area, and returned to chase and slash Li Jia in front of the KTV. Li Jia fell while escaping, turned around to hold Xu and attempted to seize the knife. During this process, Zhang and Han arrived. Zhang kicked Xu, and Xu handed the knife to Han, who then slashed Zhang on the back with it. Sun intervened and seized the knife from Han. Han and Xu fled the scene. Zhang subsequ


Upon trial, it was found that Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is located in the Mayu Development Zone of a certain city, and the defendant Li is responsible for the company's environmental protection work. Around May 2015, the company's production capacity increased, resulting in a larger volume of wastewater. The company's sewage treatment facilities could not handle the daily production of wastewater. The defendant Li contacted Liu (handled in a separate case) to remove wastewater from the company. Liu, through Jin (subject to a separate criminal detention and on the run), found a dumping site at Xinkang Chemical Equipment Co., Ltd. on Industrial Road in the same city. Subsequently, Liu hired Huang (handled in a separate case) to drive a tanker truck to the company to collect wastewater and dump it at Xinkang Chemical Equipment Co., Ltd. on Industrial Road. Defendant Jia twice opened the company gate to allow the tanker truck to enter the west-side workshop and dump the wastewater. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Li had repeatedly instructed Liu and others to remove and dump the wastewater from Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., amounting to more than ten truckloads. According to the appraisal, the wastewater produced in workshop three of Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is classified as hazardous waste, with a hazardous characteristic of T (toxicity). Defendant Li received 40,000 yuan in illicit gains from Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. On December 27, 2012, defendant Li was sentenced to one year and nine months in prison by the Intermediate People's Court of Shijiazhuang City for the crime of intentional injury and was released after serving his sentence on January 24, 2013, thus being a repeat offender. The above facts were not contested by the defendants during the trial and are confirmed by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, the filing decision letter; the list of seized items and documents; notebook copies; investigation reports and photos; test reports; case handling notes; testimonies from witnesses Zhou, Gu, Jia Jia, Yang, etc.; statements and defenses by co-defendants Liu and Huang; statements and defenses by defendants Li and Jia; interrogation recordings; call records from defendant Jia to co-defendant Huang; the case arrival report; prior conviction evidence; criminal judgment; and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: From April 2018 to October 2018, Zhang A (to be handled in another case) used the defendant Tao to forge four fake motor vehicle registration certificates and four fake motor vehicle driving certificates for the purpose of fraud. In March 2019, Han purchased four fake railway motor vehicle driving licenses and one ID card from Tao through Zhou. These documents were produced by Tao through the defendant Shen at the "Daqi Advertisement" shop operated by the defendant Zhang. The public prosecution authority, based on the criminal facts stated above, presented evidence to this court showing the confessions of defendants Tao, Zhang, and Shen, testimonies from witnesses such as Shen and Song, results from motor vehicle information inquiries, seized copies of motor vehicle registration certificates and driving licenses, WeChat personal information and bill screenshots, explanatory notes and WeChat chat screenshots, identification records, inquiry and arrest processes, and household registration proof. Accordingly


According to the prosecution's allegations, at around midnight on April 23, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Chen, along with He (handled in a separate case), after conspiring together, drove to the "XX Cattle Breeding Cooperative" operated by Cui in a certain village, town, district, city. Taking advantage of Cui and others being asleep, defendant Chen drove the car to keep watch near the breeding farm, while defendant Zhang and He (handled in a separate case) used their tools to pry open the breeding farm's wall and stole five yellow cattle (valued at 46,000 RMB) from the farm. After succeeding, defendants Chen and Zhang drove the stolen five yellow cattle to another place to sell them for a total of 40,500 RMB, which they split evenly. On June 8, 2013, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Criminal Investigation Brigade of Port North Division, Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, Zhang's family compensated the victim, Cui, for his economic losses amounting to 46,000 RMB. The victim, Cui, expressed understanding towards the actions of defendants Zhang and Chen. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Cui's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Qiu, Li, and Liu, the record of on-site inspection, site diagram, on-site photos, identification photos, identification record and photos, evidence retrieval notice, Chen's Agricultural Bank account statements, the price assessment conclusion report, appraisal opinions notice, receipt of criminal case registration form, case filing decision, arrest process, materials of Chen's voluntary surrender, household registration certificate, and the confessions of defendants Zhang and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at approximately 4:00 a.m. on August 2, 2014, the defendant Lei, in order to collect a debt, gathered defendants Wang and Nie, and armed with baseball bats, they cornered the victim Sun in a residential area of this city. They dragged him into a car and took him to the woods near the entrance of Binjiang Garden Community on Binhe East Road, where they beat him and used violent threats to demand repayment of 20,000 yuan. The victim Sun then borrowed 4,500 yuan from his friend Liu and withdrew 15,000 yuan from his bank card, handing over the total amount to defendant Lei. At around 8:00 a.m., the three defendants allowed Sun to leave. The 19,500 yuan involved in the case has been returned to the victim. Additionally, it was found that on August 22, 2014, the public security agency, led by defendant Lei, apprehended defendant Nie. After the incident, the victim Sun expressed forgiveness towards the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were accepted by defendants Lei, Wang, and Nie during the trial without objection and are corroborated by the victim's report and statement transcripts, the arrest process, witness testimonies, identification records, a list of seized items, photos of tools used in the crime, video screenshots of the incident, bank withdrawal records, payroll statements, a letter of forgiveness, the confessions of the three defendants, and household registration information, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that around midnight on August 8, 2014, the defendants Rao and Wu, along with Wu B, Wu A (both handled separately), and others, had a dispute with the victim Guo (handled in a separate case) at the Sanya Beer City in Chenyong Village, Qiaonan Street in the district, over an issue with a microphone. A fight then broke out between the parties. During the altercation, defendants Rao, Wu, and others used fists and glass cups to injure the victim Guo (resulting in minor injury level 2). The victim Guo, wielding a fruit knife, injured defendants Rao, Wu, Wu B, and Wu A (Rao, Wu, and Wu C sustained minor injuries, and Wu D's injuries are tentatively classified as minor injury level 2).


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that in the early morning of August 2, 2012, defendants Zhong and Ma, after prior discussion, went to the vicinity of the "Hongwei" ginning factory at the "Shashili" Hotel in Hongqi Village, Kuaijie Street, Shaoxing County, and stole a Benniu brand electric tricycle parked there by Yun by prying the lock and connecting wires. According to the appraisal, the vehicle was valued at 4,500 yuan. After the incident, the vehicle was recovered and returned to Yun. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhong and Ma during the court trial, and are corroborated by the evidence, including the involved vehicle and photos, the list of items seized and returned by the Shaoxing County Public Security Bureau, receipts, the criminal judgment, the certificate of apprehension and explanation issued by the police of the Shaoxing County Public Security Bureau, Yun's statement, and the price appraisal conclusion, which are sufficient to establish their validity.


A local People's Procuratorate charged that on September 1, 2016, the defendant Hou, due to his girlfriend Feng breaking up with him, posted nude photos of Feng at stations and markets. Feng reported this to the police. Around 3:00 a.m. on September 3 of the same year, Hou, along with Xiong, went to the entrance of Feng's home at Tung Lu Shan Five Village, Jinhu Street Office, Daye City. Hou kicked open the wooden door of Feng's house. Xiong entered and restrained Feng's father, Feng Sr., to prevent him from stopping Hou. Hou entered Feng's room, and using methods such as electric shocks and pulling her hair, forcibly dragged Feng from the bed to the doorway of her home. The two defendants then lifted Feng into the back seat of Hou's car, with Xiong holding down Feng's hands and feet to prevent her from resisting. Hou drove the car, taking Feng to locations such as Junshan Cemetery in Daye City and a certain village in a certain town, using threats until around 7:00 a.m. when Feng was released. Upon examination, Feng's bodily injuries were categorized as minor. After the incident, Xiong voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 4:00 PM on September 5, 2015, defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang, and Zou (criminally detained and at large) drove a vehicle with the license plate number of a certain place F××××× to the vicinity of the Hongyu Badminton Hall in Bingxi Town, Yushan County. After discussing, defendants Xu, Zou stayed in the car to keep watch and facilitate the getaway, while defendants Xu, Zhang got out of the car to commit theft. After getting out of the car, defendant Xu was responsible for keeping watch for Zhang, while defendant Zhang used a tool resembling a screwdriver to successively break the right rear window glass of the black car with license plate number of a certain place E××××× owned by victim Shu A and the passenger side window glass of the blue car with the license plate number of a certain place E××××× owned by victim Shu B, and stole cash in the amount of 2,800 yuan. Defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang, Zou used the stolen cash for fuel expenses and other expenditures, with the remainder divided equally among the four. Further investigation revealed that the stolen money had been recovered and fully returned to the victims. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang during the court trial, and were supported by the statements of victims Shu B, Shu A, identification records, scene diagrams and photos, copies of criminal judgments of the three defendants' previous convictions, and the household registration information of the three, serving as sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On September 1, 2013, at approximately 17:00, Liu, after drinking, drove a vehicle with a certain license plate to the intersection of a village on a certain road in a certain district, resulting in a traffic accident that caused one death. After the accident, in order to help Liu evade legal responsibility, defendant Sun, defendant Wang, and Liu conspired together, deciding that defendant Wang would impersonate Liu to take responsibility. Subsequently, defendants Wang and Sun provided false testimony to the traffic police department to shield Liu, thereby preventing the timely legal pursuit of Liu's responsibility. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city are true. It was also found that this case was uncovered during the investigation process by the public security organs. Defendants Wang and Sun were both summoned to the case. During the court hearing, defendants Wang and Sun raised no objections to the above facts, which were substantiated by documentary evidence such as case-breaking explanations, witness testimonies, expert opinions, and the confessions of the defendants, all sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial verification, it was found that from 2008 to 2013, the defendants Hou and Zhu, during Hou's term as the Party branch secretary and director of the village committee in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city, conspired with Zhu, the accountant of the village committee. They leveraged their official positions to assist the government in declaring the compensation for land requisition for a certain section of Wangyan Road in the village. Under the guise of others, they falsely reported 4690.4 square meters of requisitioned land, thereby fraudulently obtaining a total of 147,758.80 yuan in national land compensation funds. Subsequently, each defendant received more than 70,000 yuan of the illicit money. After the incident was exposed, defendants Hou and Zhu returned all the funds. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Hou and Zhu during the trial process, and were supported by testimonies from witnesses Jin, Hou1, Zhu1, and Yu; written evidence including four detailed diagrams of land requisition for certain sections of a highway, one expense statement; documentation of the land compensation details and related vouchers and distribution records from 2008 in a certain village; compensation details for land requisition and the village land compensation distribution table from 2013 in a certain area; records and vouchers of deposits and withdrawals from a rural commercial bank; proof documents from the People's Government of a certain town in a certain city; property inventory list and account transfer list from a certain Municipal People's Procuratorate, cash payment slips from the Bank of China; confessions of defendants Hou and Zhu and their household registration proofs and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at approximately 11 PM on July 23, 2014, defendants Shan and Peng engaged in a physical altercation due to previous disputes at the entrance of gate No. 3 of "Anta Company" located in a village in a town of a certain city. Defendant Shan injured defendant Peng's head, shoulder, and other areas with a fruit knife during the fight. After the police arrived at the scene, defendant Peng punched victim Ye, who was not involved in the fight, in the nose. According to forensic identification, the injuries to defendant Peng's left occipital region and left lower rib area were both classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while those to his left eyelid and left shoulder were classified as slight injuries. The injury to victim Ye's left nasal orbital region was classified as a minor injury of the second degree. On July 24, 2014, defendants Shan and Peng voluntarily went to the Chidian Police Station of a city police bureau to undergo an investigation following notification by phone from the public security organ. After the incident, defendant Shan compensated defendant Peng 43,700 yuan and obtained reconciliation; defendant Peng compensated victim Ye 43,700 yuan and obtained reconciliation. Additionally, after examination, it was found by this court that, according to forensic identification, the injuries to defendant Shan's left forehead, neck, and left hand were classified as slight injuries. Defendant Shan and Peng had no objections to the aforementioned facts, which were substantiated by the statement of victim Ye, the testimonies of witnesses Zhao and Zheng, medical reports, medical record materials, forensic identification provided by the forensic laboratory of the city police bureau, the recognition record, photographs, and explanations by victim Ye and witness Zhao of defendants Shan and Peng, the recognition records, photographs, and explanations by defendants Shan and Peng of the crime scene and the corresponding victims and defendants, the criminal judgment, information on previous convictions, household registration information, reeducation through labor decision, mediation agreement, reconciliation letter and receipt, as well as evidence provided by the city police bureau regarding the account of the arrest and case resolution, work explanations, and voluntary surrender report, all of which were sufficient to support the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Jinwan District in a certain city charged that on July 27, 2014, the defendants He and Liu, after conspiring, went to a certain garden in Stone Mountain, Nanshui Town, ×××× District of a certain city. Defendant Liu was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant He used a pre-prepared iron rod to pry open the garden's main gate and the lock of the columbarium, stealing four urns belonging to the garden administrator Zhong and his relatives. Subsequently, the two concealed the stolen urns separately on the roof of the garden's restroom and in the woods beside the garden's perimeter wall, among other places. On July 29, defendants He and Liu used a phone with the number 138×××××××8 to contact the victim Zhong and extorted 20,000 RMB by threatening to destroy the urns. In desperation, victim Zhong transferred 5,000 RMB to the account provided by defendants He and Liu via bank transfer and, following instructions received via text messages from the two, found two of the urns. Later, victim Zhong also found the other two urns near the garden.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On July 7, 2016, at around 16:00, the defendants Chen and Xu went to the entrance of the "Thirsty" beverage shop in a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. When they discovered a plastic bag hanging on the handle of a stroller beside Liang, Chen acted as a cover, while Xu stole the wallet. Subsequently, the two defendants were caught on the spot. The charges assert that defendants Chen and Xu, with the intent of illegal possession, jointly pickpocketed others' property. Their actions have violated Article X, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of X. Defendants Chen and Xu had previously been sentenced to imprisonment for intentional crimes and committed another crime punishable by imprisonment within five years after completing their sentence, thus they are considered recidivists and should be given a heavier punishment. The defendants Chen and Xu raised no objection to the facts and charges brought by the public prosecution. Upon investigation, it was found that on July 7, 2016, at around 16:00, the defendants Chen and Xu went to the entrance of the "Thirsty" beverage shop at the south square of Tianfa Plaza in a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. When they discovered a plastic bag hanging on the handle of a stroller beside Liang, Chen approached and, while Liang was unguarded, opened the plastic bag and found a wallet inside, then acted as a cover while Xu stole the wallet. Subsequently, the two defendants were caught on the spot. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Xu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the statements of the victim Liang, the testimonies of witnesses Lü, Weng, Chen, Dai, You, and Cheng, household registration records, on-site investigation records and photos, audiovisual materials production instructions, audiovisual materials, photo identifications by the defendants, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, explanations of how defendants Chen and Xu were brought to justice, case registration forms, case filing decisions, previous criminal records of defendants Chen and Xu, and the confessions of defendants Chen and Xu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that around 3 a.m. on May 14, 2014, defendants Gong, Ma, and Wang sneaked into the Daming Palace Steel Trading Center in a certain district of this city to steal. The three of them climbed through a window into the "Leisen Market" on the second floor. Wang kept watch in the corridor while Gong and Ma entered room B2001, stealing 900 yuan in cash, a Dell laptop, an HP printer, a Canon multifunction machine, a Shenguang laminator, and a woman's handbag. The three then fled the scene together. The stolen 900 yuan in cash was divided with Gong receiving 200 yuan and Ma receiving 700 yuan. On May 14, 2014, Wang was apprehended by the police; Gong and Ma were later apprehended on May 18, 2014. An appraisal determined that the stolen HP printer was valued at 880 yuan, the Canon multifunction machine at 370 yuan, the Shenguang laminator at 50 yuan, and the woman's handbag at 50 yuan. After the incident, Wang's family compensated the victim, Li, with 10,000 yuan for economic losses. Li expressed forgiveness for Wang's actions. The stolen HP printer, Canon printer, laminator, and woman's handbag were also recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong, Ma, and Wang during the trial, and they are corroborated by evidence provided by the police, including the case registration form, report materials, arrest records, price appraisal conclusions, victim statements, extraction records, lists of seized and returned items, on-site identification records and photos, recognition records and photos, site diagrams, site investigation records, confessions from the three defendants, and household registration certificates, sufficient to substantiate the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Kecheng District, a certain city, charged: On March 16, 2014, the victim Tang went to a certain city to visit her boyfriend Su, and was later taken to a pyramid scheme den on the third floor of No. 22, Daijia Village, Xinxin Street, Kecheng District, a certain city. Subsequently, as arranged by someone, the defendants Zhao, Ma, Li, and others used methods such as confiscating her mobile phone and accompanying her while she slept to monitor Tang closely around the clock. On the afternoon of March 26 of the same year, after receiving a report from Su, the Chengdong Police Station of the Economic Development Zone Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city rushed to the den and captured defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li on the spot. By this time, the victim Tang had been illegally deprived of her personal liberty for more than 10 days. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li during the court trial, and are substantiated by evidence including household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, the arrest record, location maps and photos, inspection transcripts, lists and photos of seized items, the victim Tang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Su and Dai, and the confessions of defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that, after premeditation, on July 19, 2013, at around 1 p.m., defendants Xiao and Zhao were involved in an incident at the eighth floor of Building No. 5 of the City Central Hospital, located on Jiangbin West Road, in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Xiao acted as a lookout at the stairwell while defendant Zhao entered the ward on the eighth floor. Taking advantage of the owner Ni's sleep on bed No. 23, Zhao stole a shoulder bag from the bedside containing 2,000 yuan in cash and a Samsung N7000 mobile phone (valued at 1,361 yuan). Following the incident, defendant Xiao returned 3,000 yuan, and defendant Zhao returned 1,000 yuan, both of which were given back to the owner, Ni. On July 31, 2013, defendant Xiao led the police to arrest defendant Zhao at the Yin Du Garden Chess and Card Room on Jinxiu Road in this district. Additionally, on August 12, 2013, Xiao reported Sher's theft crime and led the police to arrest Sher at the "Jiangxi Restaurant" on Longqiao Front Road, Zhanqian East Community in this district. The aforesaid facts were undisputed by defendants Xiao and Zhao during the court trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by the confessions of defendants Xiao and Zhao, the statement of victim Ni, the testimony of witness Zhang, recognition records, photos related to the case, certain call logs, a list of collected evidence, receipts, a price appraisal conclusion, explanatory documents, meritorious service materials, descriptions of the surrender process, a criminal judgment, a release certificate, and basic information from the permanent population, among other evidence.


The prosecution alleges that on April 24, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, defendants Zou, Hu, and Lv operated a motorized vessel equipped with electric fishing tools in the Chenluo waters of Shuangliu, Xinzhou, in the Yangtze River area of this city. The method involved defendant Lv piloting the boat while defendant Zou connected a battery and inverter to an electrified fishing net, which was then lowered into the water. Defendant Hu collected the caught fish from the water and placed them in the boat's cabin. The three defendants engaged in electric fishing for approximately one hour, illegally capturing 7 kilograms of fish. They were apprehended on the spot by fisheries enforcement officers from the Hubei Provincial Fisheries Bureau and handed over to public security authorities. The police confiscated the battery, inverter, electric net, and other tools used in the offense, and the caught fish were released back into the water. Additionally, the leadership team for the fishing ban on the Yangtze and Han Rivers in a certain locality issued a "Notice on Implementing the 2014 Fishing Ban Period in the Yangtze River," stipulating that the fishing ban period for a certain section of the Yangtze River would be from April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2014. The facts of this case were not disputed by the defendants during the court proceedings and were supported by physical evidence photos and on-site photos, accompanying case transfer lists, and lists for registering and preserving evidence, as well as written evidence such as the "Proof of the Harm of Electric Fishing to Fishery Resources in the Yangtze River" by a certain local Fisheries Administration and Port Supervision Management Office, the "Notice on Implementing the 2014 Fishing Ban Period in the Yangtze River," records of arrests and case resolution by public security authorities, household registration certificates, and certifications from the Chenluo Village Committee of Shuangliu Town, Xinzhou District, and the Water Transport Community Residents' Committee of Shuangliu Street, among other documentary evidence, on-site inspection (survey) records, audio-visual materials, and other evidence that sufficiently establishes the case.


Upon trial, it was found that around 1 a.m. on October 14, 2013, the defendants Wang and Xiao, along with Shen A, Lin A, Yang A, Wang B, and Wang A (all handled in a separate case), drove to the intersection of Jiefang Street and Chenghuang Road in a certain town of a certain county, intending to retaliate against Zhuang, with whom they had previous conflicts. Later, when they noticed a group of Zhuang's people driving a Jaguar with the license plate a××××× passing by, Wang, Xiao, and others armed themselves with machetes and attacked the car, causing multiple windows to break and significant damage to the body of the vehicle. Appraisal determined that the damaged parts of the vehicle were valued at 45,209 RMB. It was also found that on October 14, 2013, Wang persuaded defendant Xiao and the accomplices Lin A, Wang A, Yang A, Wang B, and Shen A to voluntarily surrender to the public security organ and truthfully confess their crimes. After Wang was brought to justice, he reported two criminal suspects to the public security organ, which was verified as true. During the trial in this court, the relatives of defendant Wang and accomplice Shen voluntarily paid compensation in the amount of 45,209 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xiao during the trial, and were further supported by their previous confessions, the confessions of accomplices Yang A, Lin A, Wang A, Shen A, Wang B, testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhuang, Cai, Chen, Yang, identification records, vehicle repair bills, receipts, price appraisal conclusion, household registration information, arrest records, material on meritorious service, criminal judgment, criminal archives, and payment receipts, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon investigation, it was found that at around 8:00 a.m. on April 13, 2016, the defendants Wu and Zhang, after drinking, attempted to take a taxi in the bus lane by the big pagoda tree on Xiguan Main Street, Lianhu District of the city. Due to their intoxication, no taxi agreed to take them. The two defendants then stood in the bus lane and stopped bus number 202. The driver, Dong, requested them to clear the way, but Wu and Zhang ignored him and insulted Dong, causing the bus to be unable to proceed and the passengers to be stranded. Coincidentally, police officers Lü and Wang were on their way to carry out an anti-terrorism mission and passed by. Observing the situation, they attempted to persuade the two to leave. However, Wu and Zhang refused; Wu insulted the police and grabbed the collar of one of the officers. Meanwhile, Zhang took photos, sided with Wu, and continued to block the bus. They were later forcibly controlled and removed by additional police officers who arrived. By this time, the bus had been stopped for about 30 minutes. Evidence supporting these facts includes: 1. Case registration form and report materials; 2. Documentation of the capture by the public security authorities; 3. Testimonies from witnesses Dong, Wang, Lü, Wang Yi, and Zhou Wu; 4. Identification of witnesses Wang and Lü; 5. A surveillance video tape; 6. Confessions from defendants Wu and Zhang and their household registration certificates. All the evidence was presented and cross-examined in court, and it is confirmed and sufficient to make a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of Ouhai District in a certain city charges that, at around 9:00 a.m. on June 5, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhao, together with Zhao A (handled in a separate case) and others, went to the intersection of Nanxian Avenue and Xianyang Road in Sanyang Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city. Using a bundle wrapped in ghost money, with genuine one hundred yuan bills on the outside as bait, they employed methods such as "dropping money," "picking up money," and "splitting money" to set up a scheme, gaining the trust of victim He and subsequently enticing victim He to withdraw 27,000 yuan from the bank and hand it over to defendants Zhang, Zhao, and Zhao A, among others. After succeeding, they fled the scene with the money. The defendants Zhang and Zhao raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings. Additionally, the statements of victim He, the confession of Zhao A from the same case, identification records and photographs, deposit certificates, bank transaction inquiry records, surveillance footage, explanation notes, arrest details, personal information, and information on unlawful and criminal personnel, as well as the criminal judgment and the certificate of release after serving the sentence, all serve as evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Wujiang District in a certain city charges: In the early morning of April 2, 2015, defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan, after premeditation, went near a barbecue stall at the entrance of Sanliqiao in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of Wujiang, and, using means such as beating with wooden sticks, wantonly and without reason assaulted victims Wang and Wang under the influence of alcohol, causing them injuries. According to forensic identification, the injuries to the left upper and lower limbs of victim Wang constituted minor injuries of the first degree, while the injuries to the face and right eye of victim Wang constituted slight injuries. Defendants Wu, Dong, and Duan voluntarily surrendered to the Wujiang Economic and Technological Development Zone Police Station of the Wujiang District Public Security Bureau on April 16, May 4, and May 6, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. After being brought to justice, defendant Ma truthfully confessed his criminal conduct. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution provides corresponding evidence and thus holds that defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan together wantonly assaulted others and the circumstances were egregious, their actions all constituting the crime of x. In the joint crime, defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan all played a major role and are all principal offenders. Defendants Wu, Dong, and Duan voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their crimes, thus constituting voluntary surrender. Defendant Ma truthfully confessed his crime. Please sentence them according to the law. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, or Duan during the court hearing. They are confirmed by the statement records of victims Wang and Wang, the testimony records of witnesses Ning and Cheng, identification records, the case development report, the forensic medical assessment of bodily injuries, the forensic medical documentation review opinion, hospital admission records, administrative penalty decisions, photographs, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


According to the prosecution's allegations, at around 12:30 am on July 31, 2013, the defendants He and Luo, along with Wang (handled in a separate case), sold a packet of white crystals (net weight 1.77 grams) for RMB 600 to Zhou at the intersection of North Fourth Section of First Ring Road and Hengde Road, under the Seven Days Inn in a district of Chengdu City. They were subsequently apprehended at the scene by police officers. An analysis confirmed that the white crystals contained methamphetamine.


The Sujiatun District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 8:00 p.m. on April 29, 2016, defendants Chang and Liu, after drinking, went to the front of the residential area of the electric industry in Sujiatun District and, without reason, blocked the Mazda sedan driven by Suo with the license plate number Liao AG3K63, vandalized the vehicle, and chased Suo. They then vandalized vehicles parked in the courtyard parking lot of the residential area with license plate numbers Liao A9B241, Liao ABJ777, Liao AF665V, Liao AF8J26, and Liao AC80N6, and chased Wang and Wang who came downstairs to check their vehicles. According to an appraisal, Wang (referred to as Wang in the document) suffered minor injuries which included contusions (with abrasions) on the right zygomatic area, bite marks on the left forearm and left calf resulting in skin damage. Wang (referred to as Wang in the document) suffered minor injuries which included damage to the oral mucosa, scalp bite marks resulting in skin damage, and bite marks on the right forearm resulting in skin damage. According to a price appraisal, the damaged vehicles were valued at RMB 3,411. After the incident, the two defendants reached a reconciliation agreement with all the victims and received the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial process, and were corroborated by outpatient medical records, witness testimony from Liu and Zhu, statements from victims Suo, Wang A, Wang, letters of understanding, identification transcripts, appraisal opinions, and basic population information, among other evidence, sufficient to be established.


After the trial, it was found that around 8 a.m. on November 23, 2015, the defendants Huang, Li, and Zhao rode an electric scooter to a certain village on a particular street in the new district of a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. After observing, Huang selected Room 102 of Building 86 in the village as the target for the theft. Zhao used pliers prepared in advance to cut the door lock. Huang served as a lookout, while Li and Zhao entered the room to commit the theft. Li and Zhao stole a blue Dell laptop and a black leather backpack belonging to the victim, Wang, and then escaped the scene with Huang. At around 9 a.m. on November 23, 2015, the police arrested Huang, Li, and Zhao at the intersection of Meilong Road in the new district of a certain city, and recovered the stolen laptop, backpack, and tools used in the crime: two electric scooters and a pair of pliers. According to the appraisal, the stolen Dell laptop was valued at 430 RMB, and the backpack was valued at 70 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang, Li, and Zhao during the trial, and were corroborated by relevant evidence presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to confirm their validity.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: Between May 2011 and May 31, 2012, defendants Chen and Wang, a married couple, operated an unlicensed internet cafe out of their temporary residence at No. 20 Henghecheng Road, Bazhiqiao Village, Baisha Road Street, in a certain city, without obtaining a business license, internet culture business permit, or other relevant licenses. The total revenue amounted to over 60,000 RMB, with illegal profits of 18,000 RMB. After being apprehended, defendant Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. On May 31, 2011, defendant Wang turned herself in at the Baisha Road Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Chen and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Zheng 1, Zheng 2, Liu, Zhang, and others, as well as the search record, telecommunication broadband situation report, customer registration forms, rental agreement, list of confiscated items, apprehension details, case entry statements, and identity proofs of defendants Chen and Wang, which are sufficient for conviction.


After the trial, it was found that defendant Zhang and Li were friends. On the evening of May 6, 2014, around 11 PM, defendant Zhang, due to certain reasons, drove a white Honda CRV SUV to chase a white Hyundai sedan driven by Li. When they reached about 200 meters west of the north gate of a residential area on Huixin Road in a certain county, Zhang's car forced Li's car to stop on the north side of the road. Due to a verbal disagreement, Zhang started to fight with Hou, who was sitting in the front passenger seat of Li's car. Taking advantage of the situation, Li fled the scene. Defendant Zhang then called defendant Dong and another individual, Li Yi (handled in a separate case), claiming that he was beaten near the aforementioned residential area and asked them to come quickly to assist. Defendants Dong and Li Yi rushed to the scene, and the three of them used fists, kicks, and sticks to beat Hou, injuring him. According to a forensic assessment, Hou's injuries constituted minor injuries of the second degree. It was also found that after the incident, defendants Zhang and Dong reached a civil mediation agreement with the victim Hou, whereby Zhang and Dong compensated Hou a total of RMB 35,000 for medical expenses, lost wages, inpatient meal allowances, and other economic losses. The victim Hou expressed understanding of Zhang and Dong's illegal actions. These facts were not disputed by defendants Dong and Zhang during the court hearing and are supported by evidence such as the household registration certificates of the two defendants, the civil mediation agreement, the letter of understanding, testimonies from witnesses including Li, the statement from the victim Hou, the injury assessment report by the criminal technical department of a certain county's public security bureau confirming Hou's injuries as second-degree minor injuries, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Dong and Zhang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, the court found that the defendant Zhang, in order to demand gambling debts and interest from the victim Tao Yi, forcibly took victim Tao Yi into a van at around 18:00 on October 15, 2014, at Nan Street, Xueyan Town, Wujin District, Changzhou City. Zhang then contacted defendant Li by phone to jointly demand money. Subsequently, the two defendants brought Tao Yi to the Caotiao Maixiangyuan Teahouse, forced him to write an IOU for 30,000 RMB, and made him contact his family to repay the debts. Later, defendant Li contacted "Hei" (handled in a separate case) to come over. At around 20:00 that evening, the three took Tao Yi to a fish pond in a village, where they assaulted Tao Yi and forced him to repay the money. By 22:00 that night, they took Tao Yi to a hotel in a certain town of a certain city, where they again assaulted him to force him to repay the money. The next morning at around 8:00, defendants Zhang and Li released Tao Yi after his parents repaid 30,000 RMB on his behalf.

It was also found that defendant Li turned himself in to the Panjia Police Station at around 15:00 on October 30, 2014, and truthfully confessed the facts of this case. Defendants Zhang and Li respectively returned 10,000 RMB and 20,000 RMB to victim Tao Yi and obtained his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the trial, and were sufficiently substantiated by the statement record of victim Tao Yi, the testimony records of witnesses Wang and Tao Jia, as well as the case occurrence and arrest process, identification records, and photos provided and produced by the Wujin District Public Security Bureau of Changzhou City.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On January 9, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, the defendant Hu was dissuaded and verbally summoned by police officers present due to disrupting the election procedures of the Village Committee of Shang'ao Village in Cicheng Town, this district. However, Hu did not cooperate and, during his resistance, punched officer Mao in the head and face, resulting in swelling and scratches on Mao's face and behind his left ear. On January 28, 2014, at about 2:00 PM, officers Yao, Wang, and Zhang from the Jiangbei Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau went to the restaurant operated by the defendants Hu and Wang, located at No. 12 Miaoshan Village, Cicheng Town, this district, to summon Hu regarding obstructing official duties at the election site. During this period, defendant Hu punched and kicked the police officers and instructed defendant Wang to brandish a kitchen knife at them, obstructing the officers from performing their duties according to the law. The aforementioned facts have been confessed to by defendants Hu and Wang in court and are substantiated by evidence provided by the public prosecution and verified in court, including the physical evidence of the kitchen knife, documentary evidence such as police officer credentials, identity documents, the accounts of the incident, the case-breaking narrative, seizure orders, medical records, photographs, CD production explanations, testimonies from witnesses Chen Jia, Xu, Chen Yi, Xie, and Lu, statements from the victims Mao, Wang, Yao, and Zhang, the confessions of defendants Hu and Wang, identification records, and surveillance videos. These are sufficient to establish the facts.


After a trial and investigation, it was found that on September 24, 2015, at around 7 PM, the defendants Sheng and Wang, while dining at the Kelai Xiang Restaurant near Fumin Street in a certain district of a certain city, inexplicably threw stools, bricks, and other objects under the influence of alcohol at another diner, Mr. Yu, causing a fracture to the inner wall of Mr. Yu’s left eye socket and a fracture to the left nasal bone. Additionally, they caused soft tissue contusions around the left eye and left forehead of Mr. Yang, the restaurant owner who came to intervene. According to a forensic assessment, the injuries to the head and face of Mr. Yu and the facial injuries of Mr. Yang are classified as minor injuries. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sheng and Wang during the court hearing. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Mr. Yu and Mr. Yang, the testimony of witnesses Wei, Liu, and You, the confessions of the defendants Sheng and Wang, the forensic human injury degree assessment reports numbered (Zhi) Public (Criminal) Identification Injury Zi No. 2015-322 and 359, as well as the work situation and household registration information provided by the public security organs. During the trial, the relatives of the defendants Sheng and Wang reached a consensual settlement agreement with Mr. Yu and Mr. Yang regarding civil compensation, which was fully executed.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on September 2, 2020, defendants Yao and Gong, after finishing their late-night meal at the "Chuanyi Shizu" BBQ restaurant at XXX Chengnan Road, Huinan Town, in this district, were preparing to leave when defendant Yao, intoxicated, unprovokedly questioned Wang and Ren, among others, who were having a late-night meal at the entrance of the restaurant, leading to a quarrel. Subsequently, defendants Yao and Gong physically assaulted victim Wang. During the altercation, Yao struck Wang on the head with a beer bottle, causing injury. According to forensic identification, Wang sustained a contusion on the left parietal scalp, assessed as minor injury. After the incident, defendants Yao and Gong remained at the scene for police to address the matter despite being aware that others had reported the incident. Upon detention, defendant Gong truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the court proceedings, the families of defendants Yao and Gong compensated victim Wang with RMB 10,000, and Wang expressed understanding of the defendants' actions. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yao and Gong during the trial and were corroborated by evidential materials such as: victim Wang’s statements and identification records verified in court, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Ren, Xia, He, and Li, the decision, list, and records of seized items, injury examination notification, and the forensic identification report by Shanghai Linji Health Management Consulting Co., Ltd., the letter of understanding, the incident and arrest process, confessions of defendants Yao and Gong, and household registration records. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that around 3:30 PM on November 6, 2019, defendants Yu and Li, along with another person named Yu, got into an argument with the victim, Huang, over a parking dispute at the entrance of the Sanlin Police Station located at XXX Sanlin Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai. Subsequently, defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu assaulted victim Huang by pushing, punching, and kicking him. An assessment determined that the injuries sustained by victim Huang were minor. On November 6, 2019, defendants Yu and Li, as well as the other Yu, were apprehended by public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts after being brought to the station. After the incident, the three defendants compensated the victim Huang and received his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimony and identification records of victim Huang, verified during the trial, as well as the testimony of witness Han, the forensic appraisal report from Shanghai Yangxin Health Management Consulting Co., Ltd., relevant letters of forgiveness, a list of evidence received from public security authorities, injury examination notices, records of the incident and arrest, basic information on the residential population, and confessions of defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu, among other pieces of evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.


After trial, it was found that on August 24, 2013, the defendants Sun and Liu went to the front of the underground supermarket at Grand World in a certain city. They used a window-breaking hammer to smash the glass of a black Bora sedan belonging to Wang (from a certain village in the city), which was parked there (compensation has been made). They stole 500 yuan in cash from the car, a white Apple A1332 mobile phone worth 2,396 yuan, and a black HTC 329 bar phone worth 850 yuan (all stolen goods have been returned to the owner). The total amount stolen by the two defendants amounted to 3,746 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Liu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by Wang's statement, testimony from the witness Zhao, lists of items seized and returned by the public security organs, records of capture, household registration certificates, the appraisal conclusion from the Price Certification Center of the Municipal Price Bureau, the criminal judgment No. 93 issued by the Shijiazhuang Qiaoxi District People's Court, the release certificate from Hebei Shijiazhuang Prison, reeducation through labor decision documents No. 069 (2011) and No. 27 (2012) issued by the Shijiazhuang City People's Government Labor Reeducation Management Committee, and letters of understanding, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City charged that on the morning of December 23, 2013, Tian (already sentenced), due to an economic dispute with the victim Yu, invited defendants Gong and He to drive to the victim Yu's residence in a certain community in the JinYinHu office of a certain district in the city to demand money. However, they found no success as victim Yu was out. Tian believed that victim Yu was deliberately avoiding them, which aroused his dissatisfaction. At 16:30 on the same day, together with defendants Gong and He, Tian drove into the underground garage of the community. They used steel pipes, bricks, and glass shards to smash, scrape, and damage the Audi car with license plate number E A××××× belonging to victim Yu, resulting in damage to the car body, window glass, rearview mirrors, and other parts. According to the appraisal by the pricing department, the total damage to the Audi car with license plate number E A××××× amounted to 92,158 yuan. After the incident, Tian's relatives compensated victim Yu for the economic loss with 100,000 yuan. Defendants Gong and He were apprehended and brought to justice by the sub-bureau of the Wuhan Public Security Bureau during their period of compulsory drug rehabilitation. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong and He during the court trial. The case is substantiated by evidence including photos of the damaged vehicle, documentary evidence like identity information, phone call logs, vehicle repair material application forms, vehicle information, compensation receipts, criminal judgment and release certificates, administrative penalty decision, compulsory drug rehabilitation decision, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Xu, and Bu, statements from victim Yu, confessions and identification records from defendants Gong, He, and their co-defendant Tian, price appraisal conclusion, on-site investigation records, surveillance video screenshots, and records of the process of bringing them to justice, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from November 2010 to May 2012, defendants Chen and Deng, without approval from the relevant national departments, unauthorizedly operated an internet cafe to provide internet surfing services in a house at 5-2 Shang'er Road, Shangtian Town, in the city, until they were apprehended by the police on May 16, 2012. The amount involved in the illegal operations had reached more than 66,000 RMB. On that day, defendant Deng was summoned, and defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the defendants were brought to the case, both truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Deng and Chen during the trial of this case, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Jiang, Long, and others, as well as inspection records and photos, income lists, statistical sheets, receipts, water and electricity payment slips, population information forms, and the arrest process provided by the police, which are sufficient to establish the case. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution recommends that both defendants Chen and Deng be sentenced to five to six months of detention, with a suspension of the sentence, and be fined.


The prosecution alleges that at approximately 12:20 PM on January 11, 2013, the defendants Liang and Wang sneaked into the Can’t Bite Restaurant on Starlight Avenue, Changhe Street, in this district. Taking advantage of a moment when the victim, Xu, was unprepared, the defendant Wang acted as a lookout while the defendant Liang pickpocketed an Apple iPhone 4S from the right pocket of the victim Xu's jacket, and later sold the stolen goods. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 2,700 RMB. After being brought to justice, the defendant Liang led the investigators to arrest the defendant Wang. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Liang and Wang during the trial. Additionally, the evidence is corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, an identification record, a price appraisal report, surveillance video discs, a decision on re-education through labor, previous criminal judgments, details of the arrest, an explanatory statement, household registration certificates of the defendants Liang and Wang, and their confessions to the police and in court. This evidence is sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that at approximately 1:00 PM on November 27, 2014, the defendants Guan and Liu were apprehended by police officers near the Yellow River Bank on Qinghe North Street in a certain district of a certain city. They were caught selling a package of methamphetamine (known as "ice") to Suo for the price of 500 yuan. The methamphetamine sold by Guan and Liu was confiscated, with a net weight of 0.8 grams.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On March 3, 2015, at around 16:00, after premeditation, defendants Long and Ou went to the entrance of the Guoda Pharmacy at No. 15-3 Gaoxinnan Road in Chengzhong District of this city. Defendant Ou acted as a lookout on the sidewalk in front of the Dongcheng Copy Shop, while defendant Long used a lock-picking tool to break the lock of a Dishu electric scooter parked there by the victim, Cai. Long then drove the electric scooter away from the scene. When they reached the entrance of Wenxin Home at No. 3 Customs Road in Chengzhong District, they were apprehended by the police. Defendant Ou was captured by the police at the lookout location. The stolen item was appraised by the Liuzhou City Price Certification Center and valued at 1,860 RMB. The Public Security Bureau lawfully seized the stolen electric scooter and has returned it to the victim.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at around 21:00 on February 19, 2014, the victim Wu Mouyi was deceived into a pyramid scheme hideout located at Room 602, No. 81, Zhongshan West Road, Shunchang County. Defendant Zhang locked the door, and defendants Zhang, Pan, Tu, and others attempted to recruit Wu Mouyi into the pyramid scheme. When Wu Mouyi expressed the desire to leave, defendants Zhang, Pan, Tu, and others prevented him from leaving by locking the door and taking turns to guard him, thereby illegally depriving Wu Mouyi of his personal freedom. At around 16:00 on February 26, 2014, Wu Mouyi attempted to escape by jumping from the stairs between the fifth and sixth floors at No. 81, Zhongshan West Road, Shunchang County to the first floor, where he was found by the public and rescued after they reported to the police. According to the forensic evidence assessment by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, Wu Mouyi's injuries were minor. Defendants Pan and Tu were apprehended by the public security authorities on February 26, 2014, and defendant Zhang was apprehended on April 10, 2014. After being brought to justice, the three defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. During the court trial, defendants Zhang, Pan, and Tu did not object to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the statement of the victim Wu Mouyi, the testimony of the witness Wu Moujia, documentary evidence such as the household registration certificate, a certificate of no criminal record, and a criminal record certificate issued by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, the record of events, identification transcripts, the criminal judgment (2008) Bo Xing Chu Zi No. 200 made by the People's Court of Boluo County, Guangdong Province, the forensic pathologic injury assessment certificate issued by the forensic science laboratory of the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, the on-site inspection record, site diagrams, and photos produced by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that around 10 p.m. on May 21, 2014, the defendant Han, due to an inability to properly handle personal romantic matters, got into a dispute with the victim Zan at the entrance of the construction site of the fifth section of Peacock City's University Town Phase II in the Langfang Development Zone Oriental University City. Subsequently, Han called the defendant Hu and Lin (who is at large). The three of them used fists and feet to strike Zan on the face and body, causing multiple fractures of Zan's nasal bones on both sides and a separation of the right nasomaxillary suture. After injuring Zan, the three fled the scene. According to a forensic injury assessment by the Langfang City Public Security Bureau, Zan's injuries were classified as second-degree minor injuries. On June 17, 2014, the defendant Han was arrested by the Zibo Railway Police Brigade of Qingdao Railway Public Security Office. On December 3, 2014, the defendant Hu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After arriving at the case, defendants Han and Hu both truthfully confessed their criminal behavior. Additionally, it was found that on September 6, 2014, the families of defendants Han and Hu compensated victim Zan for economic losses and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not contested by defendants Han and Hu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Han and Hu; the statement of the victim Zan; the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Niu; the forensic assessment report of human injury degree; identification records; household registration evidence, registration form of the person at large, case arrival process, administrative penalty decision, forgiveness agreement, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.