The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in July 2014, defendants Cheng and Liu were long-term residents at a certain chain hotel in a town of a certain district of a certain city. In the early morning of July 21, defendants Cheng and Liu allowed Li, Qian, and others to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in room 406 of the hotel. Subsequently, the two relocated to room 309 of the same hotel and again allowed Li to use methamphetamine that night. In the early morning of July 22, the defendants continued to allow Li, Zhu, another Zhu, and another friend of Li (whose identity is unknown) to use methamphetamine in room 309. On July 22, 2014, defendants Cheng and Liu were arrested and subsequently truthfully confessed the criminal facts of this case. They were administratively detained for ten days on October 22, 2014, by the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city for drug use in this case. Defendants Cheng and Liu raised no objection to the above facts during the court trial, supported by witness testimonies from Li, Zhu, Qian, Zhou, Dou, the inspection record and photos made by the district's public security bureau, and documented use locations and paraphernalia, a list of confiscated items, case report, the decision of public security administrative punishment, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Cheng and Liu, sufficient to confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that in January 2016, the defendants Chen and Tao, after consultation, had Chen purchase two sets of gaming machines with 16 independent operational units that allowed one person to engage in gambling activities, namely "Little Fish Machine" and "Roulette Machine." Defendant Tao funded the rental of car garages No. 7 and 8 at Building 26, Shanyang Huayuan Community, a town in the county, and placed the gambling machines purchased by Chen in the rented garages for others to gamble. They also hired people to look after the casino. On April 18, 2016, they were caught on the spot by public security officers, and the county public security bureau seized the 16 gambling machines on the spot. After the incident, defendants Chen and Tao, after being summoned by phone by the public security bureau, voluntarily surrendered to the authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. These facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Tao during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies of witnesses Wu, Liu, Li, Sun, the evidence preservation list issued by the county public security bureau, physical evidence photos, on-site records, the appraisal opinion issued by the Security Police Brigade of Yancheng Public Security Bureau, and criminal judgments, proof of serving sentences, and other evidence retrieved by the county public security bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that the defendants, Wang and Xiang, were employed in May 2014 by Huang (handled in a separate case) at an illegal nickel plating processing plant in a certain village in a certain town in Yueqing City. During this period, the two defendants were responsible for work such as degreasing, acid washing, nickel plating, rust prevention, and cleaning of products. The wastewater that adhered to the products when they were taken out from the tank or barrel, as well as the discarded wastewater, was discharged directly into the ditch without any measures being taken. On August 12 of the same year, the processing plant was discovered. Upon testing water samples extracted from the plating tank, plastic barrels, and ground seepage points within the plant, the content of heavy metals such as nickel and hexavalent chromium exceeded the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xiang during the court trial and are corroborated by evidence such as the testimony of witness Zhu, the seizure list and photos, the arrest process, the monitoring report, the acknowledgment document, the identification record, the inspection record, the site investigation record, the verification of previous convictions, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution authority charges: At approximately 3 a.m. on June 28, 2020, Wen, Yan, Liu, and others, along with the defendants Li, Wen, and another individual named Li A, arrived at Mino Frog Bar, located at 388 Jinggangshan Avenue, Anyuan Town, a district in a certain city. There, Wen, Yan, Liu, and others got into a physical altercation with Zhu. The victim, another individual named Li, seeing this situation, called 110 to report to the police and said to Zhu, "Don't hang out with this group of kids." Li, Wen, and Li A felt upset upon hearing these words and subsequently used fists, kicks, and sticks to assault Li. According to the forensic assessment, Li's injuries were classified as minor. It was further found that the defendants Li and Wen were apprehended and brought to justice on June 28, 2020, and after being taken into custody, they voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their crimes. Additionally, it was discovered that the defendants Li and Wen reached a reconciliation agreement with the victim Li, who issued a letter of understanding, expressing forgiveness for the actions of Li and Wen.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county alleges that between August 2011 and July 2012, the Zhengzhou Dongfeng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., to which defendants Yang and Li belonged, contracted the construction project of Dingsheng Garden residential area in a certain county and hired a work crew led by a person named Li for repairs. By the time the project was halted, wages totaling 185,300 yuan were owed to 12 workers. In the absence of success after multiple requests by the workers for their wages, the defendants absconded. After the county's Human Resources and Social Security Bureau issued an order to rectify within a specified period, they still failed to pay within the stipulated timeframe. The public prosecution agency presented to the court evidence including witness statements, victim testimonies, the labor security supervision order to rectify within a specified period, the workers' wage statements, identification records, and the defendants' confessions regarding the facts alleged in the indictment.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that between November 30, 2013, and May 17, 2014, defendant Zhang, taking advantage of his position as a cashier at the outpatient department of Donghai County People's Hospital, upon the request of defendant Wang, embezzled outpatient fees by failing to submit them and their reports, as well as using the receipts of other cashiers without submitting them afterward. In total, they privately retained 19 sums of outpatient fees amounting to 504,715.14 yuan for Wang's use, which were not reimbursed for over three months. After the incident was uncovered, defendants Zhang and Wang returned all embezzled funds to the hospital on September 6 and September 7, 2014, respectively, and subsequently turned themselves in to the judicial authorities on October 9 and October 10, 2014, confessing the criminal facts truthfully. To prove the charges, the prosecution has submitted related documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the defendants' confessions and defenses along with the case.


The prosecution charges: Between April 2 and April 21, 2016, the defendant Weng provided funds, and the defendant Ou provided repair technology. The two of them partnered to open a game hall on the east side of Building 8, Dongsheng North District, in a certain city. They set up one "Fishing Machine" and one "Dragon Machine" gaming machine (each with 8 player positions) in the game hall, allowing others to gamble by exchanging cash (RMB) for game points, thus illegally profiting over 8,200 yuan, with Weng holding a 90% share and Ou holding a 10% share. The actions of the defendants Weng and Ou have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. Defendant Weng is the principal culprit, and defendant Ou is an accessory. A legal sentence is requested. It is also found that on April 21, 2016, the public security organ seized two gaming machines in the game hall. After appraisal, it was determined that the seized "Dragon Machine" and "Fishing Machine" have gambling functions. After the case occurrence, defendant Weng has returned the illegal gains of 8,200 yuan. The aforementioned facts have been undisputed by defendants Weng and Ou during the trial, and are supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and cross-examined in court: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Confessions of defendants Weng and Ou; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Liu, Ji, Ye, and Liao; 4. Identification report on electronic game facilities and equipment by a certain district public security branch, [2016] No. 02; 5. On-site inspection records and photos; 6. Identification records; 7. Electronic evidence inspection work records; 8. Administrative penalty decision; 9. Process of arrest; 10. A document from a certain city's public security bureau titled "Notice on Adjusting Personnel Qualified to Identify Electronic Game Facilities and Equipment with Gambling Functions Citywide"; 11. Evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation list, seizure decision, and seizure list; 12. Bank transaction records; 13. Proof of payment return, etc., confirm that the evidence is indeed sufficient to ascertain the facts.


The prosecution alleges that in June 2015, the defendants Mai and Liang repeatedly allowed and conspired with the drug user Liao, a female, to use their rented apartment at Unit A, 601 Xinghua Court, Xijiang North Road, Duanzhou District, in a certain city, to consume the drug ketamine (commonly known as "K powder"). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Mai and Liang during the court hearing, and are substantiated by the following evidence presented by the prosecution: defendants' confessions, witness testimonies, an on-site testing report, on-site inspection records and photographs, and identification records and photographs. All of the above evidence has been cross-examined in court and confirmed by this court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on August 4, 2013, at around 20:00, in the east of Jiuxian Bridge in a certain city, Zhao (handled in a separate case) got into a fight with Mao due to a trivial matter. Zhao later called the defendant Xing, who gathered Tian, Liu, and others to drive to the vicinity of Jiuxian Bridge on Communist Youth League Road in a certain city. Defendants Xing, Tian, and Liu used iron rods and folding stools to assault Mao. According to the assessment, the victim Mao sustained minor injuries. The prosecutor read aloud and presented evidence in court to support the charges in the indictment, including the criminal case registration form, household registration information, case handling explanation, the victim Mao's statement, witness Wang's testimony, the confessions of defendants Xing, Tian, and Liu, and the forensic medical assessment of human injury degree.


The People's Procuratorate of Zhangwan District in a certain city charges: On the evening of July 13, 2014, at approximately 23:00, defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, Zhou, and others were drinking at the Congress Bar in Zhangwan District of a certain city. While participating in a prize-winning quiz activity organized by the bar, defendant Hu had a dispute with Yuan and pushed him down. Subsequently, Qi, who was accompanying Yuan, and others got into a conflict with defendants Hu and others, leading to a mutual fight. Defendants Hu and Gong used dice cups to hit victim Qi, while defendant Sun used a beer bottle to assault Qi. Later, defendant Zhou struck victim Qi on the head with his knee. According to forensic identification, the injuries to Qi's scalp and right zygomatic region were both classified as minor injuries of the second degree. Additionally, it was found that after the incident, defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou jointly compensated the victims Qi, Xia, and Gao 120,000 yuan for medical expenses. On August 13, 2014, defendant Hu signed a compensation agreement with victims Qi, Xia, and Gao, in which Hu agreed to make a one-time compensation of 40,000 yuan to victims Qi, Xia, and Gao, which has been fully paid. On the same day, victim Qi issued a letter of forgiveness towards defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou. On October 11, 2014, Xia and Gao issued an application to waive forensic identification. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou during the trial. Moreover, corroborating evidence includes: 1. The case acceptance registration form and case filing decision from Zhangwan District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; 2. Written evidence including the account of the incident, medical records, discharge records, settlement agreement, letter of forgiveness, application, and the defendants’ residence registration; 3. Forensic Medicine Institute's forensic medical injury assessment report from the Public Security Department of a certain city (No. 2014Z213); 4. Identification records and photos; 5. Testimonies from witnesses Liao, Yuan, and others; 6. Statements from victims Qi and Gao; 7. Confessions and defenses from defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City charges that between June 2015 and August 2015, defendants Lai and Huang successively went to Jianggong Road, Aiguo East Road, Yida Plaza, Datian Village, Xinshi Street Airport Road, Banghu Village in Renhe Town, and Aiguo West Road in a certain district of the city. They committed theft a total of eleven times, stealing items worth more than 15,540 yuan. To substantiate the facts of the charge, the public prosecution agency has submitted evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, and documentary evidence along with the case. According to this,


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Liaoning Province charges: Defendant Meng, during the period from June to August 2019, separately went to "Baiyun Zen Temple" in a certain city of a state, "Chongxing Zen Temple" in a certain town, and "Xiangyun Temple" in a certain township of a city, committing theft on three occasions, stealing a total of 21,500 yuan in cash. Defendant Meng, in collaboration with defendant Liu, during August 2019, separately went to "Shifo Temple" in a certain county of a province, "Ping’an Temple" in a certain county, "Dafa Temple" in a township of a certain city, "Baiyun Law Temple" in a certain township, "Wanyuan Building" in a town of a certain city, and "Longyuan Temple" in a town of a certain county, committing theft on six occasions, stealing a total of 11,700 yuan in cash, two strands of prayer beads, four bracelets, and one white jade Buddha statue. Defendant Meng, in collaboration with defendant Zhang, during the period from June to August 2019, separately went to "a temple" in a banner of a certain city, a temple in a county, "Pushan Palace" in a town of a county, "a temple" in a town of a county, "Ganlu Temple" in a certain mountain, "Wanghai Temple" in a district of a city, "Longquan Zen Temple", "Wanfo Zen Temple" in a county, "Shishan Foguang Temple" in a town of a certain city, "Dehui Temple" in a county, and "Chunxing Temple" in a county of a province, committing theft on twelve occasions, stealing a total of 19,140 yuan in cash, two strands of Buddhist beads, and one bracelet. Defendants Meng, Liu, and Zhang were each apprehended and brought to justice. Regarding the above charges, the public prosecution agency read aloud in court and presented search warrants, search records, and other documentary evidence; statements from victims such as Jia and others; testimonies from witnesses such as Guo and others; confessions and defenses from defendants Meng, Liu, and Zhang; site survey records; and site identification records, among other evidence.


The prosecution alleges that on May 29, 2020, at around 20:30, defendants Qi and Wang stole 50 meters of HYA600x2x0.4 model communication cable from China Mobile Tietong Telecommunications Co., Ltd., Changchun Branch, located outside a certain district in the city. Subsequently, Qi sold the stolen cables, received 1710 RMB, and gave Wang 700 RMB. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables were valued at 3000 RMB. After the incident, Qi and Wang compensated the victimized unit for its losses and obtained its understanding.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: On March 25, 2015, at around 7:00 p.m., the defendant Jin engaged in an argument with the victim Hu at a Zhongtong Express company in a village in Yaoxi Street, Longwan District, Wenzhou City due to a problem with scanning goods. The defendant Wei (Jin's wife) heard the quarrel and went over to reason with Hu, leading to a dispute between them. Subsequently, Wei slapped Hu twice, and the two began to grapple on the ground. Seeing this, Jin came forward and kicked Hu twice in the waist, while Wei continued to assault Hu. After Wei got up, she once again joined Jin in kicking Hu, and then the two were separated by others. According to an assessment, Hu suffered minor injuries of secondary degree. After the incident, the two defendants compensated the victim Hu with 4,500 yuan for medical expenses. For the aforementioned facts, the public prosecution agency provided corresponding evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In early 2013, the defendants Wang and Xue conspired to commit online fraud. They co-rented room 827 at Peace Plaza, Meilan District, in a city of a certain province, and separately purchased items such as phone cards, mobile phones, bulletin board systems, and bank cards. On the morning of March 27, 2013, the victim, Feng, while at his office in Taizhou Sanfu Ship Engineering Co., Ltd., saw the false information posted by defendant Wang on the internet about increasing the transaction limit of Alipay and contacted defendant Wang. Under the pretext of helping him operate, defendant Wang coaxed victim Feng into adding him as a friend and enabling the QQ remote assistance feature. Defendant Wang then used online banking transfers to deceive victim Feng into transferring 100,000 RMB from his Bank of China account to an account under the name Xu. Defendant Wang instructed defendant Xue to continue answering victim Feng's calls. Defendant Xue, knowing that defendant Wang was committing fraud, still assisted by answering victim Feng's calls and gained his trust. Later, on the grounds of needing to verify bank card information, defendant Wang once again deceived victim Feng into transferring 60,000 RMB from his bank card to the Bank of China account under the name Xu via online banking transfers. Subsequently, defendant Wang transferred the defrauded 160,000 RMB to other bank cards through online banking and instructed "Ake" (handled in another case) to withdraw all the cash via a bank ATM. After being apprehended, defendant Wang returned all the illicit money, which the public security organs have given back to victim Feng. After their arrest, defendants Wang and Xue truthfully confessed their crimes. During the litigation, defendant Xue prepaid a property penalty deposit of 30,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Wang and Xue during the court trial, and are confirmed by evidence including physical items such as phones and computers seized by the public security organs, retrieved QQ chat records, online banking transaction records, testimonies from the witnesses Wang and Yang, and the victim Feng's statement, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.


The prosecution alleged that in early 2019, the defendant Hou, while working at a certain estate in his village, met Wang Keke, who came to inquire about purchasing Lan Jinhua seedlings, and agreed to sell them to Wang Keke. Defendant Hou contacted defendant Wang to plan to steal Lan Jinhua from a mountain in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area of a certain county. The two defendants jointly stole 418 Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants, with a total value of 4,225 yuan. Defendant Hou alone stole 80 Lan Jinhua plants, valued at 800 yuan. The specific criminal facts are as follows: 1. Around 1 p.m. on February 19, 2019, defendant Hou went alone to the east slope of a mountain called "Lao Moumou Dongzi Mountain" in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 80 wild Lan Jinhua plants, which he sold to Wang Keke. 2. Around 1 p.m. on February 20, 2019, defendant Hou and defendant Wang went together to the east slope of a mountain called "Zhishi Goushan" in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 260 wild Lan Jinhua plants, which they sold to Wang Keke. 3. Around 1 p.m. on February 22, 2019, defendant Hou and defendant Wang again went to the east slope of the same "Zhishi Goushan" mountain in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 158 wild Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants. After the incident, the investigative authorities seized the 158 stolen Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants according to the law and returned them to the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area in a certain county on February 27, 2019. Defendants Hou and Wang voluntarily turned over compensation payments of 2,500 yuan each on March 18, 2019, totaling 5,000 yuan. The investigative authorities delivered the above compensation to Wulian Mountain Water Tourism Development Co., Ltd. on August 10, 2019.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges: 1. On September 17, 2015, at approximately 12:00, defendants Chen and Tan arrived at the 5th floor of Building B, Block 18, East District, a certain village in a certain district, to a certain technology company. Taking advantage of the victim Wu leaving the office and the office door being unlocked, the two entered the office and stole a black iPhone 4 placed on Wu's desk. They later sold it for 200 RMB and split the proceeds. 2. On October 12, 2015, at approximately 12:00, Chen and Tan arrived at the 2nd-floor office, Building 2, Second Industrial Zone, Xili, a certain district. Tan stood guard outside while Chen entered the office and stole a silver Apple laptop placed on the victim Lu's desk. They later sold it for 1,500 RMB and split the proceeds. According to an appraisal, the stolen Apple laptop was valued at 4,960 RMB. 3. On November 10, 2015, at approximately 12:00, Chen and Tan arrived at the East Block, Floor 802, a certain Lighting Company, Xili, a certain district. Chen stood guard outside while Tan entered the office and stole a white Huawei P7 phone from the victim Nong's desk, a black Xiaomi 2A phone from the victim Wu's desk, and a white Huawei Honor 6PLUS phone from the victim He. They later sold them for a total of 650 RMB and split the proceeds. During the trial, neither defendant Chen nor Tan disputed the above facts, which are verified by evidence such as surveillance video screenshots from the scene of the theft and surrounding areas, details of their arrest, residential registration information of the defendants, an administrative punishment decision, statements from the victims Wu, Lu, Wu, Nong, and He, confessions and defenses from defendants Chen and Tan, a price appraisal report, site investigation records and photographs, as well as surveillance footage from the crime scene and nearby roads. The evidence is sufficient to confirm the facts. The public prosecution agency submitted sentencing recommendation document No. 304 issued by the Shen Nan Procuratorate in 2016, suggesting a sentence of no more than one year in prison for the two defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On March 28, 2005, at approximately 11:40 PM, defendants Wang and Shi, after prior consultation, carried burglary tools—a screwdriver—to the "Certain Internet Cafe" operated by victims Weng and He in a certain city of a certain province, intending to commit theft. Defendants Wang and Shi initially accessed the internet in a private room at the Internet cafe. During this time, taking advantage of the store owner Weng's sleep and the absence of other people in the store, defendant Shi acted as a lookout while defendant Wang used a screwdriver to remove and steal CPU processors and memory sticks from 10 computer mainframes. After the crime, defendant Wang sold the stolen CPU processors and memory sticks to another person for 500 yuan, and the proceeds were spent jointly with defendant Shi. According to the price appraisal by a city's Price Appraisal Center, the 10 Goldstar DDR4001G memory sticks and 10 Intel PD840 CPU processors involved in the case were valued at a total of 21,160 yuan. On November 27, 2014, defendants Wang and Shi returned 21,160 yuan to victims Weng and He, obtaining their forgiveness.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain location charges that on August 13, 2015, defendants Chen and Wang agreed to go hunting together on a mountain in a certain village on August 16 of the same year. At approximately 5 a.m. on August 16, 2015, defendant Wang drove while Chen was a passenger, and both carried a hunting rifle each to a mountain col in the village to hunt, but were unsuccessful. Defendant Chen handed his hunting rifle to Wang for safekeeping and agreed to hunt together next time, then they both went home. The fact that the two defendants were illegally possessing firearms while hunting was anonymously reported to the You County Public Security Bureau. On August 19, 2015, defendants Chen and Wang surrendered themselves to the public security authorities with the hunting rifles they had. Upon assessment, the hunting rifles held by Chen and Wang were determined to be firearms. The above facts are supported by the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Wang, residence registration certificates, photo identifications, a report on their arrival process by the public security organ, and expert opinions. After trial cross-examination, defendants Chen and Wang raised no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged by the public prosecution agency, and this court confirms them.


The prosecution charges: 1. In 2011, defendants Liu and Liu, under the guise of labor dispatch, processed various qualification certificates at their "Liu Labor Dispatch" storefront. Seven individuals, including Xu B, Xu A, and Xu C, went to "Liu Labor Dispatch" to obtain a "Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificate," each paying cash amounts varying from 800 to 900 yuan. It was found that Liu and Liu, knowing full well that defendant Zhang had neither the qualifications nor the authority to issue "Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificates," still facilitated the issuance of such certificates for others, deducting about 200 yuan as processing fees per certificate, then passing the applicants' photocopied IDs, photos, and the remaining cash on to Zhang. Zhang, aware that defendant Ma lacked the qualifications or authority to issue "Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificates," still facilitated the issuance of such certificates for others, keeping 50 or 100 yuan per transaction, then passing the remainder to Ma. Ma kept 100 yuan of the processing fee before handing it over to Dong from Feixiang in a certain province. Verified by the Transport Management Office of the Handan City Transportation Bureau in a certain province, the aforementioned seven individuals did not process a road transport qualification certificate at the bureau. The above facts are not contested by defendants Liu, Zhang, Ma, and Liu during the trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by documentary and material evidence, witness testimonies, the case investigation process, and the confessions of the defendants. 2. Around 2011, defendant Liu, knowing that Guo had not undergone professional electrician skills training, still sold Guo a forged electrician certificate for about 200 yuan for personal profit. The above facts are also uncontested by defendant Liu during the trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by documentary and material evidence, witness testimonies, the case investigation process, and the defendant’s confession.


Upon trial, it was found that: 1. Between October and November 2015, the defendant Zhang funded two occasions for Liu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice" or "crystal meth") in a room at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county. 2. In early January 2016, the defendant Zheng accommodated the defendant Zhang to use methamphetamine in Zheng's dormitory in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county. 3. On February 7, 2016, the defendant Zheng funded the use of room 339 at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county for the defendant Zhang and Liu to use methamphetamine. 4. Around February 12, 2016, after the defendant Zheng handled the check-in procedures and paid the room fee in advance, and then was reimbursed by the defendant Zhang, the two of them together accommodated Liu in a room at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county to use methamphetamine. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Zheng during the trial and are substantiated by: 1. the case-solving process, arrest process, household registration proof, accommodation registration, on-site test report; 2. witness Liu's testimony and identification records; 3. confessions, defenses, and identification records of the defendants Zhang and Zheng, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: 1. Defendant Wang is accused of X crime. Since November 2018, Wang has repeatedly sold 4.2 grams of methcathinone to Li. From January to March 2020, Wang has repeatedly sold 2 grams of methcathinone to defendant Song. 2. Song is accused of X crime. From January to March 2020, Song allowed Wang to use methcathinone at his pig farm residence in Gaoping City on four occasions. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, expert opinions, and other evidence in court.


The People's Procuratorate of Wuchang District, a city in Hubei Province, charges: On November 20, 2013, at approximately 3:00 PM, defendants Li and Tao, at the bicycle parking area of Exit A of Jiyuqiao Subway Station on Heping Avenue, Wuchang District, used the method of prying open the handlebar lock to steal a Yadea TDP312Z electric bicycle (worth 2,300 RMB), which was parked there by a person named Yin. As the defendants Li and Tao were fleeing the scene, they were apprehended by the police. The stolen property has been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Tao during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. Furthermore, these facts are confirmed by the following evidence provided by the prosecution, presented and verified in court: 1. Documentation from the police on the arrest process, case resolution, and explanations of circumstances; 2. List of seized and returned items, and photos of the physical evidence; 3. The victim Yin's report and statement; 4. Confessions from defendants Li and Tao; 5. The price appraisal report; 6. Record of the case. This is sufficient for the determination.


A local people's procuratorate charged that, with the consent of her daughter Wang, the defendant Sun arranged for Wang to meet Bian through a matchmaker sometime in September 2012 and falsely claimed that she was willing to marry Bian. Subsequently, the two defendants defrauded Bian's mother, Zhao, of engagement gifts amounting to 13,700 yuan and 41,000 yuan on two separate occasions, and further defrauded Zhao of 13,000 yuan in cash on four occasions between September and December of the same year. All the amounts obtained were later squandered.


Upon examination, it was found that starting in July 2015, the defendant Chen, for the purpose of illegal profit, successively purchased a large number of counterfeit cigarettes from "Little Wang" (identity unknown, at large) and stored them in a warehouse he rented located next to Jinjiaocao Primary School in a village in Zhonggongmiao Street, Yinzhou District, a certain city. At the same time, he had his wife, the defendant Yang, sell these counterfeit cigarettes as genuine products at their business, "Lili Commercial Firm," located at 304 Ningnan North Road, Yinzhou District, which did not have a tobacco retail license. On October 14 of the same year, the defendant Chen was apprehended by police near China CITIC Bank, on the north side of Wanda Plaza in a certain city, Yinzhou District, and found large quantities of cigarettes in his car, "Lili Commercial Firm," and the warehouse. Upon assessment, 27.5 packs of genuine cigarettes and 114.5 packs of counterfeit and inferior cigarettes with forged trademarks were seized at "Lili Commercial Firm," totaling a value of 47,073.48 RMB. From the car and the warehouse, 804.7 packs of cigarettes were all found to be counterfeit and inferior cigarettes with forged trademarks, amounting to a total value of 328,507 RMB. During this period, the defendants Chen and Yang had cumulatively sold cigarettes amounting to 25,494 RMB, gaining illegal profits exceeding 20,000 RMB. On the same day, the defendant Yang was summoned to the police station. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Yang during the court trial, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, search records, seizure orders and inventories, a cigarette identification test report from the provincial tobacco quality supervision and testing station, a tobacco product price verification document from the province, identification transcripts and photos, accounting books and lists, photos of the case, the house lease agreement, explanations, arrest procedures, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: Jin Hongrun Textile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jin Hongrun Company) in a certain city owed processing fees of 17,740 yuan and 56,800 yuan respectively to defendants Zhou and Xuan. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to collect these fees, on the morning of February 26, 2014, defendants Zhou and Xuan learned of the whereabouts of Jin Hongrun Company's boss and rushed to the entrance of Jin Hongrun Company located on Jiangbei Road, Datang Town, of a certain city. The defendants Zhou and Xuan then entered the company and, failing to find the boss, used tools such as bricks, scissors, and a kitchen knife to smash a Jiangling brand box truck with the license plate D××××× belonging to Jin Hongrun Company. The city price certification center appraised the damaged parts of the vehicle at a value of 7,536 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhou and Xuan voluntarily went to the public security organ to surrender and truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provides this court with household registration certificates, civil judgment, photos, testimonies of witnesses Yan, He, Xiong, and others, the arrest process documentation, and other evidence. The prosecution of a certain city believes that defendants Zhou and Xuan intentionally damaged public and private property, which constitutes a large amount, and should be held criminally responsible for x crime, as it is a joint crime. In light of defendants Zhou’s and Xuan’s voluntary surrender after committing the crime, they may be given a lighter punishment according to law. The court is requested to punish the two defendants respectively in accordance with the provisions of Article x, Article x, and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhou and Xuan have no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After cross-examining the evidence during the trial, the evidence transferred by the prosecution was verified to be true. This court confirms the facts of the prosecution's charges against defendants Zhou and Xuan for committing x crime. It was additionally discovered that after the incident, defendants Zhou and Xuan reached a compensation agreement with the victim, compensating the victim's economic loss with 10,000 yuan and obtaining the victim's understanding.


After the trial, it was found that defendants Ou and Xu, a married couple, were involved in a civil loan dispute with Liu. Liu sued them at the Xichuan County People's Court. On February 17, 2017, the Xichuan County People's Court issued a civil judgment (2017) Yu 1326 Min Chu No. 178, ordering Ou and Xu to repay Liu 100,000 yuan within ten days after the judgment took effect. After the judgment became effective, defendants Ou and Xu did not fulfill the obligations of the judgment. Subsequently, Liu applied for mandatory enforcement. The Xichuan County People's Court filed the case on April 12, 2017, and on the same day, sent an enforcement notice, summons, and order to report assets to Ou and Xu, demanding they fulfill the obligations of the judgment by April 19, 2017. However, defendants Ou and Xu, despite being capable of fulfilling the obligations, refused to do so. On May 18, 2017, the Xichuan County People's Court decided to fine them 3,000 yuan, and on June 10, 2017, it imposed 15 days of judicial detention on Xu. On June 19, 2017, Xu and Liu reached a settlement agreement, and Xu repaid 10,000 yuan to Liu on the same day, agreeing that the remaining amount would be fully paid by June 30, 2018. On the same day, the Xichuan County People's Court lifted defendant Xu's judicial detention. Defendants Ou and Xu, despite being capable, still refused to fulfill the obligations of the judgment. After the incident, defendants Ou and Xu fulfilled all the obligations specified in the judgment. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ou and Xu during the trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from An, Zheng, Wan, Shang, and others, as well as evidence such as the divorce registration form, case closure certification, Xichuan County People's Court enforcement dossier, the account of apprehension, criminal record check, and household registration certificate, sufficiently establishing the case.


The prosecution charges: From December 2014 to January 2015, the defendants Yu, Liu, and Chen collaborated at a certain chess and card room at No. 200, Qiangan Road, in a town in Pinghu City, organizing gambling activities in the form of "Tong Zi Gong" seven times for individuals including Liu A and Xu, among others. Defendant Liu was responsible for taking a cut of the profits, while defendant Chen was responsible for keeping watch and serving drinks, resulting in illegal profits totaling over 4,500 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including the case registration form, witness testimonies, arrest records, the criminal judgment, criminal background checks, and identification proof, thereby sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On October 14, 2013, at around 12 PM, defendants Wei and Zhang had an argument with Jiang Yi over trivial matters in the kitchen of the F xx Garment Factory located in Dongfeng Village, Feiyun Street, Ruian City, which then led to a physical altercation. Subsequently, the two parties engaged in another fight on the road outside the kitchen. During this fight, after Jiang Yi fell to the ground, defendants Wei and Zhang continued to punch him and kicked his waist and abdomen, causing injuries. According to the medical examination, the main injuries sustained by the victim, Jiang Yi, were a facial laceration 1.8 cm in length; fractures of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 9th ribs on the left side; and a pneumothorax on the left side. The injuries were classified as minor. After the incident, defendants Wei and Zhang surrendered to the public security authorities on October 25 and November 27, 2013, respectively. A mediation agreement was reached with the victim, Jiang Yi, with compensation of 15,000 yuan, and forgiveness was obtained. During the court hearing, defendant Wei raised no objection to the aforementioned facts, which are confirmed by the statements of the victim Jiang Yi, testimonies from witnesses Jiang Jia, Ai Jia, Ai Yi, and Chen, inspection records, identification records, a CT examination report, a forensic medical injury assessment report, the mediation agreement, a receipt, a report on waiving criminal liability, records of surrender, explanatory notes, and population information, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.


The prosecution agency charges that from early 2016 to February 17, defendant Liao operated a casino at Huiqun Chess and Card Room, Dawei Industrial Zone, Wenhua North Road, Chancheng District, in a certain city. Liao attracted gamblers to gamble by playing "Three Cards" with poker and profited by taking a rake from the games. Defendant Wang, Liao's husband, recruited gamblers by participating in the games, and defendant Li was responsible for dealing cards and collecting the rake at the casino. After collecting the rake, Liao used the remaining funds for meals and entertainment with Wang, Li, and others after expenses were deducted. On February 17, 2016, at around 11 PM, the casino was apprehended by police while organizing gambling activities at the above location. The police caught defendants Liao, Li, and Wang at the scene, along with nine gamblers, and seized gambling funds of 9,710 yuan and a rake of 1,260 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Liao, Li, and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Xu, Liu, Tan, Zhang A, Zhang B, Huang, Xiao, Chen, and Wu; the crime scene investigation and search records; scene photos; arrest process documentation; lists of seized items; detention lists; temporary seizure receipts; cash payment slips; item transfer lists with the case; household registration certificates; and the confessions and identification records of defendants Liao, Li, and Wang during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that around the year 2000, defendants Zheng and Du jointly invested in the establishment of the Hengshui Wanxiang Electroplating Factory, with Zheng as the legal representative. This factory was later renamed Hengshui Xishui Electroplating Factory and Hengshui Dashun Metal Surface Treatment Co., Ltd. Zheng was responsible for the west courtyard workshop of the company, while Du was responsible for the east courtyard workshop. Around 2010, Zheng's brother-in-law, defendant Zhao, leased two workshops in the west courtyard from Zheng to engage in galvanizing business. During their operations, the three defendants discharged the wastewater generated from galvanizing into pipelines and sedimentation tanks without anti-seepage measures and stored over three tons of wastewater in a wastewater treatment pool without anti-seepage measures. According to the judicial appraisal by Cangzhou Science and Technology Affairs Judicial Appraisal Center, the wastewater from the galvanizing workshop of Hengshui Dashun Metal Surface Treatment Co., Ltd. is classified as hazardous waste, with the hazardous characteristic being T. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants and their defense attorneys during the court hearing. Furthermore, witness testimonies from individuals such as Liu, Wu, Sun, and Wang, along with on-site inspections, examination records, and photographs, and the judicial appraisal report, all serve as sufficient evidence to confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Xiangqiao District, a certain city, charges: Defendants Chen and Ding, at approximately 4:00 a.m. on October 9, 2015, while driving a car near the entrance of XX Residential Area on Xinqiao East Road in a certain city, got into a dispute with defendants Zhuang and Liu, who were driving a Buick sedan. Subsequently, defendant Chen used a steel pipe to assault the victim Liu, and when the victim Zhuang tried to intervene, he was also assaulted by Chen. Afterwards, defendants Chen and Ding left the scene by car and gathered defendant Fan along with accomplices Chen Tian and Xie Hong (both at large) and others to return to Sanli Street to seek revenge against the victims Liu and Zhuang. Seeing this, victims Zhuang and Liu fled, and defendants Chen, Chen Tian, Xie Hong, and others chased the two victims with steel pipes and a "cross" iron frame, and used these tools to smash the iron gate of the Light Industry Dormitory Community on Sanli Street, Xinqiao East Road in a certain city. Defendants Chen, Ding, Fan, and Chen Tian used tools such as steel pipes to smash a Buick sedan with license plate number XXXXXX, left at the scene by victim Zhuang, causing damage to the car. Later, the group of defendants again left the scene by car and, passing by an unnamed silver shop on Xinqiao East Road in a certain city, encountered the victim Liu. The defendants and their accomplices again used tools such as steel pipes to assault the victim Liu. According to forensic evaluation, Liu's injury was classified as minor injury level 2; Zhuang's injury was classified as minor; the damage to victim Zhuang's Buick car was valued at 5,272 RMB. The prosecution provides the defendants' confessions at the public security and procuratorial authorities, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification records, forensic opinions, and related documentary and physical evidence as proof.


The prosecution charges: On July 15, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Liu, in order to obtain illegal profits, set up a casino in Room 208 of the chess and card room at XX Hotel in Taizhou, agreeing to split the profits equally. They organized gambling activities by playing "mahjong," involving participants including Wang, Jin, Jiang, and Cai. The casino was discovered and shut down on the afternoon of July 18 of the same month, by which time it had profited 12,000 RMB through rake-off. On July 18, the defendants Zhao and Liu were apprehended. During the trial, the defendants Zhao and Liu each returned illegal gains amounting to 6,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhao and Liu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of gamblers Wang, Jin, Jiang, Cai, and Ruan, as well as inspection records and photographs, identification transcripts, the arrest process, defendant Zhao A's previous criminal judgment, and the public security administrative penalty decision, sufficient to confirm the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province charges: On a certain day in October 2019, the defendants Chen and Pan1, Shen1 (both handled in separate cases) conspired to steal the victim Ye's mobile phone, which Shen1 then sold. In the early morning of October 30, 2019, the defendant Chen invited the victim Ye to a room in a certain building on the north side of a certain square in a certain district of a certain city where Chen was renting, for an overnight stay. Pan1 took the opportunity to steal the victim Ye's black iPhone XS Max (valued at 4877 RMB as appraised), and Shen1 sold the phone in a certain city of a certain province for 5100 RMB. The defendant Chen received 2400 RMB as his share. On October 30, 2019, the defendant Zhu, knowing the phone was stolen by Shen1, still, at Shen1's request, used the method of cash advance through the credit card linked to the victim Ye’s Alipay on the stolen phone to steal, obtaining 5300 RMB from the victim Ye. The defendant Zhu received 2230 RMB as his share of the stolen money. After the case was solved, the defendants Chen, Zhu, Pan1, and Shen1 collectively returned 10,800 RMB of stolen money to the victim Ye, who expressed understanding towards the defendants Chen, Zhu, and others.


The People's Procuratorate of Xuanwu District, Nanjing City, a certain province, charges that in September 2018, the defendants Liu, Shi, and Wang harbored each other and others to use the drug marijuana at their respective residences in a certain city of a certain province.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province charges that on February 9, 2016, at around 2 p.m., defendants Lu and Hu broke the window of a black Highlander SUV parked next to the Fenghua Tiancheng residential area parking lot in this city district using a rock. They stole a black bag from inside the car, which contained more than 5,000 yuan. On February 24, 2016, defendants Lu and Hu, while being questioned by the public security authorities due to suspicious behavior, confessed to the aforementioned criminal act.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges:

1. In late October 2014, the defendant Zhong, together with Wang A (handled in a separate case), organized and attracted gamblers, including Xu and Ling, to gather and gamble in the form of "Tongzigong" twice inside the fruit district store 603, Building 6, at the wholesale market for agricultural and sideline products on Zhenxing West Road in the city. The defendant Wang was arranged to take a rake-off, and they profited approximately over 4000 yuan in total.

2. In early November 2014, the defendant Zhong, together with Wang A, organized and attracted gamblers, including Xu and Ling, to gather and gamble in the form of "Tongzigong" twice inside Zhiccheng Weaving Co., Ltd. in Shimen Town, a certain city. The defendant Wang was arranged to take a rake-off, and they profited approximately over 4000 yuan in total.


Upon trial, it was found that on the afternoon of October 1, 2014, defendants Sun and Han, along with others, unlawfully restricted the personal freedom of the victim, Wang, at Sun's residence located at the Lu Hun Reservoir Management Bureau family compound on Chuangye Road in the high-tech zone of a certain city, in order to demand repayment of a debt from Wang. They also assaulted Wang, forcing him to issue an IOU to both of them. On the same day, defendants Sun and Han, along with others, took Wang to Sun's rented residence in Zhongtai Century City on Lichun West Road in the Jianxi District of a certain city, where they used assault and threats to coerce Wang into repaying the debt. Later, due to a report to the police by Wang's family, Sun and Han were apprehended. The aforementioned facts did not elicit any objection from defendants Sun and Han during the course of the trial. Furthermore, the facts are corroborated by evidence including the household registration and current behavioral proof of defendants Sun and Han, the case-solving process, proof of apprehension, list of seizures, medical diagnosis certificates, basic population information inquiry forms, receipts, explanatory statements, victim Wang's statement and report materials, the testimony of witness Wang, and the confessions of defendants Sun and Han, which are sufficient for determination.


Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Dong instructed the defendant Gan to look for a prefabricated steel house for purchase and use. On the morning of June 3, 2015, Gan informed Dong that there was an unused container mobile house (placed by Sun from a certain village of the eighth farm in a certain district) located across from the Haitong gas station on the Fengjian Line in Heiyanzi Town, Fengnan District. Gan then took Dong to inspect the site, explaining that he knew the owner of the house but did not have contact information. Dong proposed to take the mobile house away, and Gan agreed, stating that he would negotiate with the owner if any issues arose. That afternoon, Dong hired a crane to steal the container mobile house along with a bed and other items inside. According to an appraisal, the stolen container mobile house and items inside were valued at a total of 8,746 RMB.

Furthermore, on June 23, 2015, the victim, Sun, discovered the theft of his container mobile house and reported it to the police. During the investigation, the police identified Dong as a suspect and summoned him for questioning. Dong and Gan conspired for Gan to provide false testimony to the police, claiming that Dong had purchased the container mobile house from someone else. Later, when Gan was summoned by the police, he gave false testimony in an attempt to cover for Dong. After the incident, the police retrieved the stolen container mobile house and items, which were returned to the victim. Dong's relatives compensated the victim, Sun, with 1,800 RMB for economic losses.

The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Dong and Gan during the court proceedings and were substantiated by the victim Sun's statement, the testimony of the witness Shi, identification records and photographs, a price appraisal report, a list of seized and returned items, a letter of understanding, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.


Upon investigation, it was found that in mid-March 2013, defendants Kong and Li were using methamphetamine together at Kong's residence, located in Room 1303 of a building in Hengsheng Haoting, a district in a certain city. Defendant Kong entrusted defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine for him. Defendant Li stated that purchasing methamphetamine required contacting his girlfriend, defendant Rong, to buy it through her friend. Subsequently, defendant Rong fronted 7,000 yuan for Kong, allowing Jiang (currently at large) to purchase 30 grams of methamphetamine from another location, 20 grams of which were for defendant Kong. On March 27, Jiang (currently at large) delivered the 30 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Rong. Later, defendant Li contacted defendant Kong and handed over 20 grams of methamphetamine to Kong under the building at Jinse Wutong community, for which defendant Kong paid 7,000 yuan. The remaining 10 grams were jointly consumed by defendants Rong and Li. On March 28, 2013, at around 11:00 PM, defendant Kong was arrested at a hotel in Huangshan Mansion in a certain district of a certain city for using drugs and purchasing drugs from Wu (dealt with separately). After being apprehended, defendant Kong voluntarily disclosed that methamphetamine was hidden in his home, and he led police officers to his residence, where 11.6 grams of methamphetamine were seized (the remaining portion of the methamphetamine purchased by defendants Li and Rong). Tests confirmed the presence of methamphetamine in the seized drugs. On December 14, 2013, defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the police after receiving a call from police officers and truthfully confessed to his criminal actions. After his arrest, defendant Li proactively contacted defendant Rong and led police officers to directly apprehend defendant Rong at the Lianghuai Howard Johnson Hotel in a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Kong, Li, and Rong during the court proceedings. These were corroborated by evidence such as the city's Public Security Bureau Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute's appraisal report, urine test report, identification transcript, search record, weight record, list of seized items, specialized drug seizure receipt, photographs, household registration certificates, detailed account of the arrest, criminal judgment, and explanatory notes, which are sufficient for the conviction.


Upon investigation, the court found: 1. One night in late May 2014, the defendant Liu allowed Ying to use methamphetamine together in his rented apartment at 1+1 Apartment, Room 202, Sanlukou Street, Jinhua City. 2. One night in early June 2014, the defendant Liu allowed Ying to use methamphetamine together in his rented apartment at 1+1 Apartment, Room 202, Sanlukou Street, Jinhua City. 3. On the night of September 25, 2015, the defendant Ying allowed the defendant Liu, as well as Cao and Lou (handled in separate cases), to use methamphetamine that Liu provided by heating and inhaling it in Ying's temporary residence at Room 1108, Building B, Shenhua Mansion, Sanjiang Street, Jinhua City. At around 6 a.m. on September 26, 2015, the defendants Ying and Liu were summoned by the public security authorities at the Locomotive Internet Cafe on Sanjiang Street, Jinhua City, and brought to justice. Both defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. On the same day, the police seized and confiscated a set of drug use tools in Ying's temporary residence at Room 1108, Building B, Shenhua Mansion. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Ying during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Jiang, Cao, and Lou; the on-site inspection report; the identification record; inspection record; evidence preservation list; list of confiscated items; administrative penalty decision; determination of drug addiction; compulsory isolation drug rehabilitation decision; arrest process; population information; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Liu and Ying, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.


The prosecution accused that on the afternoon of August 14, 2015, the defendants Wu and Xu, after prior discussion, drove a rented car with the license plate number Zhe J××××× to a certain village in a certain town to look for a target to steal from. Defendant Wu noticed that the first-floor window of house number 1-21, owned by an individual named Jin, was not closed, so he instructed defendant Xu to park the car in support, and then Wu got out of the car and entered Jin's house by climbing through the window. While searching for valuables on the second-floor bed, he was discovered by Jin and failed to succeed. Defendant Wu jumped out of the second-floor window to escape but was soon caught by villagers; defendant Xu fled by car. On the day of the incident, the police responded to the call, arrived on the scene, and summoned defendant Wu to the case, and later that night, defendant Xu was arrested. After coming into custody, defendant Xu truthfully confessed to the crime. The aforementioned facts, which defendants Wu and Xu did not object to during the court proceedings, are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lu, Li Jia, Chen, Li Yi, Wang, and Ye, the statement of the victim Jin, the confessions of the defendants Wu and Xu during the investigation phase, the description of the arrest process, the on-site investigation records and photographs, the identification records and photographs, the fingerprint identification report, the list of received evidence, the prior conviction judgment, the household registration certificates, and population information forms, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses that on the morning of April 6, 2019, defendants Jia and Wei, in the "Dong XX" private room of XX Bar in Xuanwu District of this city, took advantage of the victim Qiao's drunken and unconscious state, and Wei used his hand to touch Qiao's buttocks and inserted his finger into Qiao's vagina, committing an act of molestation. Defendant Jia attempted to engage in sexual intercourse with Qiao by rubbing his genitalia against Qiao's body, but was unsuccessful due to the failure of his genitalia to become erect.


The People's Procuratorate of Luzhai County, a District in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged that on August 16, 2013, at approximately 11:00 am, the defendant Wu, in collaboration with Ceng and Meng, carried out a premeditated plan. Wu used the arcade machine key and credit card provided by Ceng, in collusion with Meng, to steal game points from a certain store in five instances, totaling 70,000 points, which they then exchanged for cash amounting to 3,500 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on January 6, 2014, at around 18:00, the defendants Tan and Yan, after premeditation, used a screwdriver to pry open the desk drawer at the "Xingli" gas station operated by the victim, Xu, in a certain village, Anhai Town, of a certain city, and stole 3,600 yuan in cash. After the defendant Yan was brought to justice, the public security authorities, with his assistance, arrested the defendant Tan in a rented house in a certain village in Anhai Town. This court further ascertains that after the incident, the public security authorities retrieved a screwdriver, the tool used in the crime, from the victim Xu; the defendants' family members compensated the victim Xu for the economic loss and obtained his forgiveness. The stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Tan and Yan during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, documentary evidence retrieval list and photos, letter of forgiveness, copies of ID cards and household registration certificates, the account of solving and handling the case, on-site inspection records, photos and plans, identification records and photos, surveillance footage, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon investigation, it was found that between August 14 and 30, 2013, the defendants Zhang, Li, and Wang, under the instructions of the defendant Lan, successively used methods such as physical assault, 24-hour surveillance, and restricting communication freedom to detain He in a rented house at No. 44 Shuiyi, Shicuo Village, Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone, a certain state, with the intention of forcing He to participate in illegal pyramid schemes. By the time they were discovered on August 30, 2013, He had been illegally detained by Lan and others for a total of 11 days. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Lan, Zhang, Li, and Wang during the court trial, and are supported by the victim He's statement; the testimonies of witnesses Yu and Chen; the case investigation report from the Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone branch of a certain city's public security bureau, as well as the household registration certificates and evidence of no prior criminal records of Lan, Zhang, Li, and Wang; and the on-site investigation records and photographs from the Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone branch of a certain city's public security bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The Jiangdong District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that from March to April 2014, the defendant, Huang, operated a casino in Room xx, Building x, xx Lane, Xurong Road, Jiangdong District, a certain city. He organized 10 to 20 people to gamble in the form of "Stud Poker" and made a profit of 15,000 yuan by taking commissions. The defendant, Dai, and Zhang C (handled in a separate case) were responsible for taking commissions within the casino. It is also found that the defendant, Huang, illegally profited 5,300 yuan. On April 30, 2014, the defendants, Huang and Dai, were arrested in Room xx, Building x, xx Lane, Xurong Road, Jiangdong District, a certain city. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged by the two defendants during the trial process and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang A, Lin, Xia, Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Ye, Tu, Zhou, Chen Jia, Yu, Chen Yi, Zhang B, Mao, Chu, Jin, Xue, Chen Bing, and Zheng, as well as evidence provided by the public security organs, including the household registration certificates of the two defendants, seizure decisions, seizure lists, inspection records, administrative penalty decisions, the course of capture, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Mai, for profit, together with the defendant Luo, sold methamphetamine worth 100 yuan (commonly known as "ice", verified to be 0.37 grams in net weight) to drug user Long Cici. This occurred around 2 a.m. on September 10, 2015, at the Huangtang Garden on XX Road, in the XX District of a certain city, where the defendant Mai was renting an accommodation.


The prosecution charges: At around 4 a.m. on May 19, 2014, defendant Zhang, near the intersection of Xiumen Street and Beirenzijie Street in the former Qiaodong District of the city, got into a dispute with victims Di, Chen, Han, and Fu. Zhang contacted defendants Dong and Liu, and together they assaulted the four victims. During the assault, defendant Zhang instructed Dong to use a dagger, after which Dong used the dagger to stab victims Di and Chen. Defendant Liu used a belt to beat the four victims. The forensic assessment concluded that victims Di and Chen sustained second-degree serious injuries, while victims Han and Fu sustained minor injuries. The prosecution presented evidence in court regarding the above charges, including documentary evidence, witness testimonies, surveillance video, victim statements, and defendant confessions.


The prosecution accused: On February 6, 2016, Wang, Liu borrowed 80,000 yuan from the defendants Jin and Li, citing the need for money to undertake an engineering project, with an agreed interest of 36,000 yuan, to be repaid within three months. After the loan's due date, as Wang and Liu failed to make the repayment, the defendants Jin and Li reported to the Ningjiang Branch of the Criminal Police Brigade on December 23, 2016, claiming that Wang and Liu had defrauded them of 116,000 yuan under the pretense of obtaining a public welfare job. On the same day, the Ningjiang Branch of the Songyuan Public Security Bureau registered the case as a criminal fraud case involving Wang and Liu and began an initial investigation. By December 27, 2016, after investigation by the Ningjiang Branch of the Songyuan Public Security Bureau, it was discovered that the allegations by defendants Jin and Li against victims Wang and Liu were false, based on fabricated facts. Regarding the above accusations, the prosecution submitted the following documentary evidence to the court: proof of residence and current conduct, arrest records, bank query records, receipts, extraction transcripts, case handling explanations, and other evidence materials; testimonies from witnesses Li and another individual surnamed Li; statements from the victims Wang and Liu; and confessions from defendants Jin and Li.


The prosecution charges: On April 30, 2015, at around 9 PM, the defendants Ceng and Li were strolling to a rotary in Mayuan, Qixingguan District of a certain city when they noticed a silver-white two-wheeled scooter parked under a footbridge. The two conspired to steal the vehicle and took it to their temporary residence at the Shuangshu Bay demolition house. The next day, after getting drunk, they transported the scooter to a motorcycle repair shop to get the lock changed. While en route on Bihai Avenue, they were stopped for questioning by patrolling police officers and taken back to the police station until they sobered up. Subsequently, the two truthfully confessed to the aforementioned actions. After the incident, the police returned the motorcycle seized on-site to the victim, Zhao. The stolen motorcycle was appraised at a value of 2,188 RMB. It is believed that the defendants Ceng and Li have the following sentencing circumstances: they truthfully confessed the criminal facts upon being brought to the case, had a good attitude towards admitting guilt during the trial; the stolen vehicle was recovered and returned to the victim; Ceng has a criminal record. The established evidence includes the confessions of defendants Ceng and Li, the victim Zhao’s statement, the process of apprehension, identification records of the scene and the stolen vehicle, forensic photographs, appraisal conclusion letter, notification, list of seized and returned items, criminal judgment and release certificates, household registration certificates, and other evidence. It is recommended that the two defendants be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from six months to one year and six months. Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Ceng and Li had no objection to the facts, evidence, or charges and pleaded guilty and showed remorse in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone charges that between July and September 2012, the defendants Zhang and Zhou, after prior discussion, first had Zhang search for unlocked electric bicycles within the Jin Xiu Decoration City of a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone. Zhang would then notify Zhou to ride away with the electric bicycle, resulting in the theft of three electric bicycles with a total value of RMB 3772.43. The specifics are as follows:

1. One day in early July 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked AIMA electric bicycle parked by Yuan (female, born on November 10, 1970, the victim in this case) in the parking area in front of the Jin Xiu Cigarette and Alcohol Supermarket within the Jin Xiu Decoration City. Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1485.05.

2. One day in mid to late August 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked Luyuan electric bicycle at the stairway entrance on the west side of the Jin Xiu Decoration City, parked by Pan (male, born on December 29, 1959, the victim in this case). Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1274.

3. On September 30, 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked Incalcu electric bicycle parked in the passageway in front of the Shan Hua Carpet store within the Jin Xiu Decoration City, belonging to Chen (male, born on September 22, 1966, the victim in this case). Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1013.38.

After the incident, defendants Zhang and Zhou returned the stolen money; defendant Zhou assisted the police in apprehending Zhang after being caught. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Zhou during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen, Pan, and Yuan, testimonies from witnesses Jiang and Han, identification records, the criminal judgment, release certificates, receipts, a price appraisal conclusion, and the case investigation process, which are sufficient for recognition.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on February 25, 2016, at around 18:00, defendants Zhou and Tan, after planning, prepared items such as wigs, glasses, gloves, masks, hats, and handcuffs. They went to a section of road in front of the entrance No. 5 of the International Exhibition Center of SM Plaza in Fupu Community, Luoshan Street, in a certain city to meet victim Wang, who was about to drive away. Defendant Tan grabbed victim Wang by the neck, and together with defendant Zhou, forcibly pulled victim Wang from the driver's seat to the back seat. Defendant Zhou drove the car and robbed victim Wang of a China Construction Bank card, withdrawing 20,000 RMB in cash from the card. They also caused multiple contusions and abrasions to victim Wang's body. Subsequently, the two defendants tied up victim Wang in the car and fled the scene. According to an assessment, the injuries to victim Wang’s right forehead, facial area, nose, and neck were classified as minor injuries. On March 18 and 25, 2016, defendants Zhou and Tan were arrested and brought to justice one after the other. After the incident, the family of defendant Zhou voluntarily returned 10,000 RMB of the illegal gains on his behalf to victim Wang. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Tan during the trial, and are supported by victim Wang's statement, the list of collected evidence, bank transaction records, surveillance screenshots, restitution list, photos of injuries, the police's account of the arrest and case resolution, defendants' identity information, criminal records, criminal judgments, criminal rulings, proof of release upon completion of sentence, detention certificates, identification records and explanations, on-site inspection records, extraction of traces, physical evidence registration forms, site plans, on-site photos, appraisal report by the Forensic Identification Office of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhou and Tan.


After trial, it was found that the defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang were all security personnel from the Jianghan Road Pedestrian Street Management Committee in a certain district of this city. At around 21:00 on April 22, 2014, defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang were rectifying the illegal road occupation construction in front of a Cabbeen franchise store located on Jianghan Road Pedestrian Street in a certain district of the city when they had an argument with the victim Dong, who was setting up scaffolding at the above location. During this time, defendant Ye tried to slap victim Dong in the face. Dong evaded and ran towards Exit D of Jianghan Road Subway Station. Defendants Ye, Hu, Zhang, and others then collectively chased the victim into Jianghan Road Subway Station in the same district. Defendants Ye and Hu jointly assaulted the victim with fists and kicks. Subsequently, Zhang and Hu each grabbed one of the victim's arms, while Ye struck the victim's chest with his knee, resulting in injuries to Dong. Forensic identification determined that victim Dong suffered fractures of the 4th and 5th ribs on the left side, with the injuries classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, on receiving an oral summons from the public security authorities, defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the police on May 8 of the same year. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, Ye, Hu, and Zhang reached a civil settlement with victim Dong, compensating him jointly for economic losses totalling 40,000 RMB due to the injuries (which has been paid). Victim Dong voluntarily waived the right to pursue civil liability against the said defendants and expressed understanding towards defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the letter of understanding, basic information of the permanent population, query records from the National Criminal Information Resource Database, documents regarding the arrest and case-solving process from the public security authorities, witness testimonies from Cheng Moumou, Wei Moumou, Wu Moumou, Dong A, Yang Moumou, and Feng Moumou, the victim Dong's statement, and the forensic identification opinion of the victim's injuries, which are sufficient to substantiate the case.


A local People's Procuratorate charged that from October 2016 to December 24th, Zhou (handled in a separate case) and the defendants Zhang and Lu, for the purpose of profit, set up two yellow "Xiaoyu" gaming machines in a wonton shop rented by Zhang next to the Experimental Primary School in Batandu Town, Binhai County. One machine was jointly purchased by defendants Lu and Zhang, and the other by defendant Zhang and Zhou. Each "Xiaoyu" gaming machine had two basic units that could independently be operated by one person each, for gambling purposes. They then allowed Lin, Zhang, Luo, and Chen (all minors) to gamble. According to the Public Security Police Brigade of Yancheng City Public Security Bureau, these two "Xiaoyu" machines were identified as electronic gaming devices with gambling functions. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Lu voluntarily surrendered to the Binhai County Public Security Bureau on December 24th, 2016, and June 5th, 2017, respectively, and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The Binhai County Public Security Bureau lawfully seized the two "Xiaoyu" machines and 72 yuan from inside the machines. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Lu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhang, Luo, and Chen, as well as evidence provided by the Binhai County Public Security Bureau, including household registration certificates, case development records, situation explanations, on-site photos, on-site inspection records, evidence preservation lists, special receipt for temporarily withheld funds, and the Determination of Gambling Function of Electronic Gaming Facilities and Equipment No. 97 [2016] issued by the Public Security Police Brigade of Yancheng City Public Security Bureau. This evidence is sufficient to establish the case.


After trial investigation, it has been found that: On July 20, 2016, at around 20:00, the defendants Yin and Zhu, under the influence of alcohol, got into a dispute with stall owner Li over the purchase of jelly at the night market street on Weiye Road, Mingzhu Industrial Park, Conghua District, a certain city in a certain province. Taking advantage of their inebriated state, defendants Yin and Zhu overturned the table belonging to Li and Sun, who had come to mediate the dispute. Subsequently, defendant Yin used a fruit knife, and Zhu resorted to punching and kicking, thereby injuring Sun and Li. According to a forensic assessment, Sun's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while Li sustained slight injuries. Further investigation revealed that, due to the aforementioned provocative behavior, defendants Yin and Zhu were apprehended by the public security authorities on July 20, 2016. They were then administratively detained for fifteen days (from July 21, 2016, to August 5, 2016) and were criminally detained for this case on July 30, 2016, and arrested on August 24 of the same year. Hence, the actual administrative detention period for the defendants related to this case was 9 days, which should be deducted from their prison term. After the incident, the defendants' families provided some compensation to the victims, thereby obtaining the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Yin and Zhu during the trial. They were corroborated by statements from victims Sun and Li provided by the public prosecutor in court, verified and authenticated by the court, testimonies from witnesses Sun Yi, Li Bing, Lei Yi, and Cao, the defendants Yin and Zhu's confessions and site identifications, photographs of the crime tools and scenes, the victims' identification records and photos recognizing the defendants Yin and Zhu, witness Li Bing and Sun Yi's identification records and photos recognizing defendant Yin, defendant Yin's identificat


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: From May 5 to May 8, 2013, defendants Nie and Tan, together with others, organized gambling gatherings in a certain residential area in this city, profiting over 7,000 RMB from rake-offs. From the end of March to April 9, 2013, defendant Nie, along with others, organized gambling gatherings in a certain residential area and other locations in this city, and hired Wang, Zhu, Liang, Tian, and others (who have all been sentenced) to work in the casino. During this period, they earned approximately over 100,000 RMB from rake-offs. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution agency read out and presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence, written evidence, recognition records, inspection records, and the confessions of the two defendants in court.


After trial, it was found: 1. On November 10, 2014, at approximately 1 PM, defendants Li and Wang stole a mobile phone worth 380.97 yuan from the victim Liu near the "Yonghui Supermarket" at the Salt Avenue in Renhuai City. The phone has been recovered and returned to the owner. 2. On November 10, 2014, at approximately 2 PM, defendants Li, Wang, and Huang stole an Apple brand mobile phone worth 1204.66 yuan from the victim Chen near the "Xianghe Restaurant" at the Avenue in Renhuai City. The phone has been recovered and returned to the owner. These facts are confirmed by evidence such as case registration forms, household registration certificates, victim statements, identification records, and appraisal conclusions. The three defendants raised no objections during the trial, and these facts are sufficient to establish the case.


After examination, it was found that in the early morning of August 22, 2013, at Good Song KTV in Zhangdian District, Zibo City, the defendants Luan and Liu had a dispute with Fang and Zhao over trivial matters, which led to a physical altercation between the parties. Defendants Luan and Liu injured Fang's head and left ear and injured Zhao's left hand. According to the assessment, Fang's injuries constituted minor injuries, and Zhao's injuries constituted slight injuries. After the incident, defendants Luan and Liu compensated the victims Fang and Zhao for their economic losses and obtained their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Luan and Liu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by evidence including the apprehension materials issued by the Xingxue Street Police Station of the Zhangdian Public Security Sub-bureau, the statements of victims Fang and Zhao, the testimonies of witnesses Li, Zheng, Cao, Lü, and Han, injury assessment reports, medical records, compensation agreement, and letter of understanding, along with the confessions and identification of defendants Luan and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 4 a.m. on April 9, 2015, the defendant Zheng, after buying cigarettes at the "Fuxing" tobacco and alcohol store located at the Lianyu intersection, Lianyu Community, Qingyang Street, in a certain city, intended to join the card game of the victim, Xu, and others in the store. Feeling displeased by Xu's mocking him for having no money, Zheng started an argument with Xu and was the first to physically assault Xu. Seeing this, Zheng’s friend, the defendant Huang, stepped in to help, and both defendants took part in beating the victim, Xu, using bottles and other tools, causing injuries to Xu's nose and other areas. Forensic examination determined that the injury to Xu's nose constituted minor injury, level two. On April 17, 2015, the defendant Zheng was apprehended by the police at a tobacco and alcohol store under the "Haifeng" hotel in Qinghua Community, Qingyang Street, in the city. On May 4, the defendant Huang voluntarily turned himself in to the city's public security bureau. After the incident, the defendant Zheng compensated the victim Xu with 55,000 RMB, and Xu expressed forgiveness for the actions of the two defendants. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zheng and Huang during the trial and are sufficiently corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, testimony from witness Lin, identification records, photos and explanations of the identifications, forensic medical injury assessment, medical diagnosis and records, the mediation agreement and receipt, household registration information, site surveillance video, and documents issued by the public security organs, including the certificate of the voluntary surrender, details of the arrest and case resolution, and work explanations.


The prosecution charges that at around 9 a.m. on November 5, 2013, the defendants Li and Wang went to the entrance of No. 92, Hongxiang Road, Oriental Industrial Zone, Louqiao Subdistrict, Ouhai District, a certain city. Seeing a mobile phone in the pocket of the victim Hu's jacket, they used a pair of tweezers to steal an Apple 4S phone from Hu. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Wang during the trial. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the statement of the victim Hu, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Chi, the identification record and photos, the list of seized items and photos, the explanation of the seizure process, surveillance video discs, an explanatory note, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release upon completion of sentence, the details of the arrest, identification documents, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that in May 2020, defendants Ban and Sha jointly sold heroin to Ke for RMB 30, RMB 10, and RMB 20 on three occasions at a shack by the roadside of the nut base in a certain county. On June 30, 2020, at about 16:00, defendants Ban and Sha jointly sold heroin to Sha for RMB 20 at the same location. On June 30, 2020, at around 22:00, defendant Sha was arrested at the nut base in a certain county. The police seized RMB 100 from the right pocket of Sha's pants, a rose gold OPPO touchscreen phone from the left side of the bed in the shack by the roadside of the nut base, and 8 packets of heroin wrapped in a black plastic bag from a red cigarette box on the right side of the bed in the shack. The heroin weighed a total of 1.38 grams. On July 21, 2020, at about 10:00, defendant Ban was arrested at his home in a certain county. The evidence establishing the above facts includes physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses of the defendants, expert opinions, identification records, and investigation records.


The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charges: On the evening of June 13, 2017, the defendants Sun, Gong, Liu, Fang, and Xu, in an attempt to teach the victim Bao a lesson, lured the victim Bao to Room 8313 of ** Hotel in Donghu Street, Yuhang District, in a certain city. There, they punched and kicked him, and robbed him of one iPhone 6 on the spot and transferred 2,058.31 yuan from his Alipay account. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 1,400 yuan. After the incident, the iPhone was recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The evidence supporting the charges includes documentary evidence such as household registration certificates; hotel surveillance videos; victim statements; price appraisals; records of seizure and identification; confessions and defenses of the defendants, among others.


After the trial, it was found that around 23:00 on May 10, 2013, Zhao Moujia contacted the defendant Zhang for help because her boyfriend Zhao Mouyi was slapped by Wang. The defendant Zhang gathered the defendants Shao and Li Moumou, Wu Mou (already sentenced), and others, and rushed to the entrance of Zhengtai Hotel near the front gate of the zoo on Dongjie, Xijianhe, in a certain district of a certain city. They attacked the victim Wang with machetes, wooden sticks, and bricks, causing multiple cut wounds on his head with a total scar length of 46.6 cm, and a cut wound on his neck with a scar length of 8.2 cm. According to the forensic assessment of the certain district public security judicial identification center of the city, Wang's injuries constituted minor injuries. On January 25, 2015, the defendant Zhang compensated the victim Wang with 30,000 yuan; on October 27, 2019, Shao's family compensated the victim Wang with 12,000 yuan and obtained his forgiveness. On October 27, 2019, the defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered to the case after a phone summons by the public security organ; on January 7, 2020, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered after a phone summons by the public security organ. The aforementioned facts have no objection raised by the defendants Shao and Zhang during the court trial, and are also confirmed by evidence including the case registration form, investigation report, process of surrender, process of capture, explanatory notes, and appraisal documents issued by the Xinghualing Branch Bureau of the city public security bureau; the interrogation transcript, letter of forgiveness, and receipt from the victim Wang; testimonies and identification transcripts of witnesses Wu Mou, Dong, Zhao Moujia, Zhang Moujia, Zhao Mouyi, Tian, and Fan; as well as the defendants Shao and Zhang's household registration certificates and confessions, which are sufficient to determine the case.


After the trial, it was found that at approximately 23:20 on May 27, 2013, in front of Jiahui Pharmacy at the night market in Shenze County, the defendant Li had a dispute with taxi driver Wang Moumou and called Zhao and others to beat Wang Moumou. The defendant Zhao used a knife he was carrying to stab Wang Moumou in the chest. According to the Shenze Judicial Forensic Identification Center, Wang Moumou's injuries were classified as minor. On June 27, 2013, the families of defendants Zhao and Li compensated the victim Wang Moumou a total of 105,000 yuan for various expenses and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Wang Moumou's statement; testimonies from witnesses Zhang A, Zhang B, Zhang C, Zhang D, Cao Moumou, Chen Moumou, Li A, and Li B; the process of bringing the case to court; photos of physical evidence; inspection records and photos; appraisal report; mediation agreement; and inquiry records; household registration certificates, among other evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that at around 3 a.m. on May 4, 2017, defendants Du and Ji entered the "Traffic Light Grocery" located at No. 63, Jinguang Road, in a certain town of a certain district of a certain city, and stole 49 cartons and 6 packs of cigarettes, along with 6 bottles of Wuliangye liquor. According to the price certification center of a certain district of a certain city, the wholesale market value of the stolen cigarettes and Wuliangye liquor on the day of the incident was RMB 16,620. Further investigation by this court found that after the incident, the public security organ recovered 6 cartons and 11 packs of the stolen cigarettes and 2 bottles of the stolen Wuliangye liquor. They also seized a "vivox9" mobile phone used in the crime, and returned the recovered Wuliangye liquor and cigarettes to the victim. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial. The evidence includes the case registration form, basic information of permanent residents, the process by which they were brought to justice, this court's criminal judgment (2011) No. 16-2 and (2016) Chuan 1111 No. 18, information on the release of criminals from Sichuan Province Jinjiang Prison, release certificates (stubs), mobile phone transaction voucher photos, customer ledger, statements, sales slips of famous liquor from the Agricultural Reclamation, Skynet surveillance videos and screenshots, urine sample collection records, on-site testing reports, urine test photos, identification of surveillance video screenshots, surveillance video screenshots, crime scene and stolen goods photos, records and photos of the crime scene and sales site identification, videos, seizure list, return list, photos of the stolen Wuliangye liquor and cigarettes, photos of the mobile phone information of Ji and Wang1, on-site inspection transcripts, location maps, site plan diagrams, scene photos, price valuation conclusion reports No. [2017] 029 and 032 from the price certification center of a certain district of a certain city, statements from victims Zhu and Wang2, testimonies and identification records from witnesses Shi and Wang1, as well as the confessions, defenses, identification records, and interrogation videos of defendants Du and Ji, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 2 a.m. on September 11, 2014, in the Fuyuan Tomato Factory in Langshan Town, Linhe District, a dispute occurred between Zhao, the raw material purchasing team leader of the tomato factory, and the victim, Yang. Defendant Wang, on the south side of the factory's reception room, punched Yang and kneeled on Yang’s abdomen. Subsequently, Wang pushed Yang into the reception room, where, together with defendant Ba, they punched and kicked Yang, resulting in multiple rib fractures on both sides. According to the assessment, Yang's injuries were classified as Level 2 minor injuries. After the incident, Wang and Ba voluntarily surrendered themselves, under the guidance of officer Wang A from the factory's police unit. The Fuyuan Tomato Factory in Langshan Town, Linhe District compensated the victim for medical expenses totaling 8,000 yuan.


The prosecution alleges that between August 8 and 12, 2013, the defendants Yuan and Hu, along with Mao, Zhou, and Hu A (all of whom have been sentenced) organized gambling activities involving bullfighting at Louyan Farm in Shangtian Town, in this city. During these activities, they involved Lin, Hu B, Chen, and others, and extracted more than 113,000 yuan in fees from the gambling operations. During this period, defendant Yuan illegally profited over 34,000 yuan. Additionally, Yuan provided 70,000 yuan in gambling funds to participants at high interest rates, earning over 1,600 yuan in interest. From August 8 to 15, 2013, defendant Hu assisted in collecting the fees and received a commission of over 1,800 yuan. On January 24, 2014, defendant Hu, under the persuasion and accompaniment of defendant Yuan, turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. Furthermore, it was found that on the afternoon of November 18, 2013, defendant Yuan was arrested by the police on a bus at the Jinshan toll station on the Shenhai Expressway. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and Hu during the trial and were corroborated by confessions from co-defendants Mao, Zhou, and Hu A, testimony from witnesses Fan, Chen, Dai, and Hu B, identification records, inspection records, criminal judgment and release certificates, administrative penalty decisions, specialized receipts for temporarily seized items, population information, and account of the arrest, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found: Defendant Yuan is the director of Sunshine Bilingual Kindergarten in a certain village, town, county. In 2015, Defendant Yuan hired Defendant Cui to drive and transport kindergarten students. At around 7 a.m. on August 31, 2016, Defendant Cui was driving minivan with license plate Ji D××××× in front of Sunshine Bilingual Kindergarten in a certain village, town, county to transport students and was caught by the police. The minivan was authorized to carry 8 passengers, but actually carried 18, constituting serious overloading. It was further found that after the incident, Defendants Yuan and Cui voluntarily surrendered themselves. The defendants raised no objections to these facts during the court hearing, and the testimonies of witnesses Wu and Liu, photos of the vehicle transporting students, household registration certificates, as well as the confessions of Defendants Yuan and Cui provide sufficient evidence for these facts.


The prosecution agency charges: On June 27, 2015, at around 10:00 PM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to No. 64, Qiaonan New Village, a village in a certain town in a certain district of Ningbo City, and stole a Philips brand electric scooter parked by He (worth 1,600 yuan). They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On July 30th of the same year, at around 4:00 AM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to No. 117, Prosperity Road, a certain town in a certain district, in front of Dejie Electric Appliance Store, and stole a set of batteries from an electric scooter parked by Liu. Afterwards, they went to the entrance of No. 62, Prosperity Road, and stole a set of batteries from a tricycle parked by Jiang (worth 680 yuan). They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On August 2nd of the same year, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to Thirteen Holes Bridge beside Hushan Village, a certain town in a certain district, and stole a set of batteries from an electric scooter parked by Shi. They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On the evening of August 20th of the same year, defendant Wu was arrested in a village in a certain town in a certain district. At around 4:00 PM on September 30th of the same year, defendant Ding was arrested in a village in a certain town in a certain district. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Wu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims He, Liu, Jiang, and Shi, identification records, pointing out records, surveillance video, the appraisal opinion from the Ningbo City Price Certification Center, the administrative penalty decision by the Yinzhou Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau, the arrest process, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that during February 2016, the defendants Wei and Shi colluded to open a casino at No. 33, Zhongliao District, a village in Jinjing Town of a certain city, providing gambling tools "stickers" for gatherings to gamble, and profiting from it. During this period, Shi B (handled in a separate case), Wei's husband, knowingly assisted the defendant Wei with transporting her to and from the casino. On February 25, 2016, the police uncovered this casino at the mentioned location and caught the defendants Wei, Shi B, and gamblers Shi 2, Shi 1, Shi A, among others, red-handed. At the scene, they seized gambling funds amounting to 21,950 RMB, one set of gambling tools "stickers", and three dice. Investigation revealed that more than twenty individuals were participating in gambling at the casino. On March 22, 2016, defendant Shi was apprehended by the police at the "Xiangyun" tea shop on Xiabing Street of Xiabing Village, Jinjing Town, in a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Shi and Wei during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Shi 1, Shi 2, Shi 3, Shi 4, Shi 5, Shi 6, Shi 7, Shi 8, and Xu, as well as by the decision on evidence preservation, the item seizure list, the administrative penalty decision notice, the identification records and photos of identified persons, household registration information, the confession of co-defendant Shi B, and the documentation of arrest and case-solving by law enforcement agencies, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.