After examination, it was found that at around 14:00 on May 16, 2014, the defendants Wei and Zhu stole a Lvjia brand electric bicycle worth 3,200 RMB from the victim Huang on the roadside opposite the Wuhan Industrial and Commercial Administration Bureau on Hong Kong Road in Jianghan District of this city. The vehicle contained over 1,200 RMB in cash, shopping cards, an ID card, a backpack, and other items. On August 22 of the same year, at around 15:00, defendants Wei and Zhu went to the front of the Wuhan Library on Jianshe Avenue in Jianghan District of this city and stole a Rex brand bicycle worth 300 RMB from the victim Li. They were apprehended by public security personnel while escaping with the bicycle. The public security personnel also found on Zhu the stolen backpack and ID card belonging to victim Huang. The aforementioned backpack, ID card, and bicycle were returned to victims Huang and Li, respectively. The stolen items and cash from victim Huang have been squandered and lost. The defendants had no objections to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are supported by evidence including photographs of physical evidence, the arrest and case-solving process by the public security authority, basic information on permanent residents, criminal judgment documents, seizure orders, lists of seized and returned items, bicycle warranty cards, the testimonies of witnesses Lu and Wang, the statements of victims Huang and Li, and an appraisal of value opinion, all sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that in February 2012, Zhang A (deceased) used a gray Jiabao brand minivan as collateral to borrow 2,000 yuan from the defendant Zhang. Due to an inability to repay the debt, the vehicle was further sold to the defendant Zhao for 1,900 yuan. On January 28, 2014, the vehicle was seized by the Suning County Public Security Bureau and was identified as the vehicle stolen from Sun Moumou in a certain city on the night of February 10, 2012. It has since been returned, with an assessed value of 17,755 yuan. These facts are not contested by the defendants Zhang and Zhao during the court hearing. Additionally, there is evidence such as photographs of the involved minivan and the driving license, the victim Sun Moumou's statement, identification records, seizure and return inventories from Suning County Public Security Bureau, the appraisal conclusion from Suning County Price Certification Center, proof of residence, and information on the stolen vehicle, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that during December 2012 (lunar calendar), defendants Mao and Xiao, Nie, Xu, Li B, Li C (all already sentenced), along with Dong (handled in a separate case), conspired together for the purpose of profit. They set up a casino in the form of a "small stake" in a rented house in SanYang, ShanMa Village, Chengbei Street in this city, gathering people for gambling. Defendant Lian along with Ming, Wu, Li A, Xu (all already sentenced), and Wang (handled in a separate case) were hired to keep watch for the casino, with Defendant Lian participating for about ten days. The casino was in operation for about a month, gaining more than 100,000 RMB from rake-offs. On November 28, 2013, Defendant Mao voluntarily surrendered to the Wendou Police Station of Lichuan City Public Security Bureau in Hubei Province. On December 17 of the same year, Defendant Lian was apprehended by the public security organs in a certain village on Chengbei Street in this city. After returning to the case, both defendants truthfully confessed to the facts involved. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Defendants Mao and Lian during the trial and were supported by the confessions of co-defendants Xiao, Nie, Xu, Li B, Wu, Ming, Li A, Xu, and Li C, as well as the testimonies of witnesses Yang and Tian, the household registration certificates of both defendants, the confession statements, arrest procedure testimonies, and criminal judgment documents of co-defendants, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 24, 2018, drug users Jin and Liu contacted the defendant Liu to purchase drugs. Since the defendant Liu knew that the defendant Tong had access to drug sources, Liu contacted the defendant Tong to purchase drugs. The defendant Tong informed the defendant Liu that he could buy drugs at a certain location. That afternoon, the defendants Liu, Tong, and Ge (handled in a separate case) met near the Hailai Local Cuisine Restaurant in a certain district of the city. The defendant Tong was responsible for driving them to the location to purchase drugs. During the trip, the defendant Tong provided his personal Alipay account to receive 500 yuan from Jin as payment for the drugs. After driving to a hospital at a certain location, the defendant Tong instructed Ge to get out of the car to purchase drugs from the supplier. The defendants Tong and Liu waited in the car. After Ge acquired the drugs, he first handed them to the defendant Tong, who then passed the drugs to the defendant Liu. The three then drove back to Pingyao. On the way, the defendant Liu got off the car at a certain district to sell two packets of methamphetamine (weighing about 0.68 grams) to Liu for 1,100 yuan. Later, the defendant Tong drove Liu to another district where, after getting out, the defendant Liu sold one packet of methamphetamine (weighing 0.34 grams) to Jin for 800 yuan. He was caught on the spot by the public security authorities. The evidence to support the charges includes physical evidence such as seized drugs (photographs), a list of seized items, witness testimonies, records of searches and identifications, drug inspection reports, discs, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The prosecution charges that the defendants Xue and Ji conspired to use forged vehicle purchase tax payment certificates to defraud car buyers of their money. On December 4, 2013, defendant Ji falsely claimed to Zhou during the process of registering a vehicle that cash could not be used for the vehicle purchase tax and that he would pay on behalf of Zhou using a bank card, thus defrauding Zhou of RMB 12,222 intended for the vehicle purchase tax. Subsequently, in the "Guangming Advertising and Printing" shop located opposite the Pizhou City Education Bureau, defendants Xue and Ji used forged blank "Vehicle Purchase Tax Payment Certificates" purchased from others and had Chen (handled in a separate case) fill out the certificate as proof of tax payment for a Foton vehicle purchased by Zhou. Ji then took the forged "Vehicle Purchase Tax Payment Certificate" with Zhou to the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau's Vehicle Management Office to process the relevant paperwork. That afternoon, Zhou returned to the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau's Vehicle Management Office to verify the status of the vehicle purchase tax payment and discovered the fraud. Zhou then contacted Ji by phone to come to the Vehicle Management Office, whereupon defendant Ji was summoned by the police of the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau. After paying Zhou's vehicle purchase tax, defendant Xue was inquiring about the situation at the Zhaodun Police Station of the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau when he was summoned by the police. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Xue and Ji during the trial. Furthermore, the evidence presented, including proof of the defendants' criminal responsibility age, the victim Zhou's statements, witness testimonies from individuals such as Chen, the forged vehicle purchase tax payment certificates and other physical evidence, identification records, the Pizhou City State Taxation Bureau's certifications, and accounts of the case's investigation and the defendants' apprehension, were sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: On April 11, 2013, at around 11 a.m., the defendant Dai agreed with Wang over the phone to sell Wang a package of methamphetamine in the corridor of the third floor of the Guoli Hotel in the Luqiao District, Taizhou City, for 300 RMB. Subsequently, Dai and Wang separately instructed the defendants Yang and Zhou via phone to go to the Guoli Hotel to complete the transaction. Zhou was caught by police officers in Room 612 of the Jindi Hotel in the Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, handing over the package of drugs to Wang, and the package of drugs was seized on the spot. On the same day, at around 5 p.m., the defendant Dai agreed with Zhou over the phone to sell Zhou two packages of methamphetamine for 1000 RMB at the Hongjia Ceramic City in the Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City. Later, Dai instructed the defendant Yang via phone to complete the transaction with Zhou. At the end of the transaction, Yang was apprehended on the spot by police officers, and the two packages of drugs intended for the transaction were seized. On the same day, at around 11 p.m., Dai was arrested by police officers in the Jinxin Hotel in the Luqiao District, Taizhou City. According to identification, the three packages of drugs contained methamphetamine components, with a total net weight of 1.82 grams. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Dai and Yang did not object during the trial, are sufficiently corroborated by the recognition records, testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Du, Li, and Wang, the public security administrative punishment decision, search records, seizure lists, drug handover lists, certain national mobile communication customer details, arrest process, situation explanations, household registration certificates, and physical evidence inspection reports.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 11 a.m. on October 15, 2012, while the victims Cheng and Li (husband and wife) were negotiating a minor collision with another car owner in Alley 11, Buchang Village, District 73 of Baocheng, defendant Liang, suspect "A" (identity unknown, at large) and others gathered to watch. Victim Li noticed that Liang's electric scooter was blocking the front of his car, so he scolded Liang and the other onlookers. Suspect "A" then had a verbal altercation with victim Li, which escalated into a physical fight between the two. Seeing this, defendants Liang and Xu, along with suspect "A", used iron rods and car locks to beat victims Li and Cheng and smashed victim Li's car, a Yue BXXXXX Ruiji vehicle, resulting in damage. According to the assessment, victim Li sustained minor injuries, and the repair cost for the vehicle damage was 2,302 yuan. On November 26, 2012, defendants Liang and Xu were apprehended and brought to justice. Liang and Xu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, which are corroborated by relevant evidence and sufficient to be established.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accused that during December 2018, the defendants Zhao and Han, knowing that the money they helped retrieve for a certain Weng (handled in a separate case) was the proceeds of a crime, still repeatedly assisted in quickly withdrawing the fraudulent funds from multiple banks in a certain town, county, and province, in order to earn a fee. Defendant Zhao alone or by arranging for defendant Han to withdraw a total of RMB 74,229.2, and defendant Han participated in withdrawing RMB 64,529.2. Defendants Han and Zhao were apprehended by the police on January 16 and 17, 2019, respectively, and they confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts truthfully after being brought to justice. To prove the charged criminal facts, the prosecution read or presented in court evidence including the victim's statements, relevant documentary evidence, the defendants' confessions, and defenses.


The prosecution alleges that at around 12 noon on March 14, 2014, defendants Qiu and Li conspired to go to the sock shaping workshop of the third phase of Langsha on Jiang Street, Yiwu City. They stole eight packages totaling 961 pairs of stockings from the workshop, valued at 5,285 RMB, and hid them behind the wall of the third phase of Langsha. Later, they threw the stolen socks over the wall into the neighboring Shunhui Zipper Factory, waiting for an opportunity to retrieve them. When the two attempted to enter Shunhui Zipper Factory to take the socks, they were refused by the factory's security guards, who reported the situation to the relevant person in charge at Langsha, Huang. Huang then retrieved seven packages of socks from Shunhui Zipper Factory, while defendant Qiu took one package from the factory. They were later apprehended by staff from the Yiwu City Public Security Bureau. The stolen goods have been recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The facts mentioned above are not disputed by defendants Qiu and Li during the trial. Additionally, the case is confirmed with the testimony of the victim Huang, testimonies from witnesses Wang and Gong, onsite identification records and photos, the case handover process, seizure orders, return list and photos, price evaluation report, the confessions of defendants Qiu and Li, and identity verification documentation, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that on April 17, 2014, due to a debt dispute, the defendant Huang attempted to forcibly take away a GMC 6000CC business vehicle with the license plate Sichuan A×××××, which was actually owned by him but mortgaged to the victim Xu. At about 18:00 that day, the defendant Huang gathered the defendant Wang and others including Guo, Li, and Wu (all handled in separate cases) to the coal yard at Beiyanhe Water Tower Bridge Train Station in Henglin Town, a certain district of a certain city, where the victim Xu resided. The defendant Huang, in collusion with Wang and others, used methods such as hammer beating and tape binding to assault and control the victims Xu and Xia. They also instructed Guo and others to forcibly take away the GMC vehicle. To prevent the victims from calling the police, they threw an iPhone 4, a surveillance host, and a probe host, all property of the victim, into the river, causing a total loss valued at RMB 800. During this time, the personal freedom of victims Xu and Xia was illegally restricted for about 2 hours. According to forensic identification, the injuries of victim Xu were classified as minor injuries. It was further found that, after the incident, the family of defendant Huang compensated the victims for their economic losses and reached a settlement agreement. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang and Wang in court, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Xu and Xia, discharge records, outpatient medical records, promissory notes, mediation memos, testimony records of witnesses Li, Guo, Liu, and Ren, an arrest report and situation explanation from the police station in Guangde County, a certain province, basic information provided by the Chengdu Detention Center, and case report, arrest report, work records, forensic injury identification, and administrative penalty decision issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain district of a certain city, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that defendant Li, from early July 2015, was employed by a man nicknamed "Fatty" at a garbage compression station in a certain village of a city's certain district, responsible for dismembering and cleaning the dead and diseased pigs brought by "Fatty," and then placing them in the freezer for freezing. "Fatty" would then sell the above-mentioned foods that did not meet safety standards. Defendant Zhang, from early August 2015, was employed by "Fatty" at an old house near the meteorological bureau in a similar village, tasked with processing the non-compliant pork and other items brought by "Fatty" into non-compliant sausages, cured meats, and the like, after which "Fatty" would sell these non-compliant products. The city's People's Procuratorate provided evidence such as seizure lists, test reports, case-solving processes, witness testimonies, and defendant confessions, alleging that the actions of defendants Li and Zhang violated the relevant article of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted a crime as specified by that article. The court is requested to render a verdict according to the law.

Defendants Li and Zhang do not dispute the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang argued: First, Zhang is a first-time offender and pleaded guilty with a good attitude, and in the joint crime, played the role of an accessory. Second, Zhang truthfully confessed to h


The public prosecution charges: On March 14, 2017, at approximately midnight, Zhao had a dispute with taxi driver Li over taking a taxi. When the taxi was driving to the entrance of a transition farmers' market on Xiwang Road in Xishan District of a certain city, Li got out of the car to call the police, and Zhao called Zhao. Police officer You from the Jinjiahe Police Station, accompanied by auxiliary police officer Zhou, arrived at the scene after responding to the call. Zhao, along with the defendants Lu and Chen, also arrived at the scene. Defendant Lu knocked off police officer You's law enforcement recorder. Later, reinforcement police officer Li, along with auxiliary police officer Zhou, arrived at the scene. Defendant Lu used violence to attack the police officers and auxiliary police officers. Defendant Chen held the auxiliary police officer by the waist to obstruct law enforcement, and grabbed the auxiliary police officer's tear gas, spraying it into the auxiliary police officer's face. The obstruction of law enforcement only ceased after police officer You fired two warning shots. The defendants did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are sufficiently evidenced by the household registration proofs, arrest records, defendants' confessions, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification transcripts and photos, on-site identification transcripts and photos, audio-visual materials, letters of understanding, and documentary evidence presented by the public prosecution and verified by this court. It was also found that the two defendants have compensated the victims for economic losses and obtained their understanding.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 9 p.m. on January 11, 2014, the defendants Wang, Zheng, and Huang (at large) intercepted vehicles at random on the road near Donghai Department Store on Tangtou Avenue, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District after drinking. They damaged the mirror of a car. The victims Qiu, Wang A, and Zhou stepped forward to intervene and were assaulted by Wang, Zheng, and Huang. Later, the police arrived at the scene after receiving a report and arrested Wang and Zheng. According to the assessment, the injuries of victims Qiu and Wang A were minor, and victim Zhou's injuries did not reach the level of minor. Furthermore, on January 20, 2014, the defendants Wang and Zheng compensated the victims Qiu and Wang A for their financial losses and received forgiveness. The defendants Wang and Zheng had no objection to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by relevant evidence verified in court, sufficient for confirmation.


After trial, it was determined: On April 22, 2014, Wei, Tian, Zhang, and Ge (all of whom have been sentenced) jointly organized others to gamble in the form of "Bullfighting" at the "Swallowtail" teahouse on Wangyue Road, Hanjiang District, of a certain city, and took a share of the profits. Among them, Zhang invited the defendant Zhou. Later, defendant Zhou and defendant Bo went together and invested 40,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan, respectively, with defendant Bo providing funds to the gamblers on site. During the gambling, the total amount of money involved exceeded 100,000 yuan, with over 20,000 yuan being taken as profit. Defendant Zhou received a "kickback" and interest totaling over 6,000 yuan from Zhang, out of which the interest obtained from providing gambling funds was 1,500 yuan (calculated at 300 yuan interest per 10,000 yuan), and defendant Bo received 300 yuan of this interest. After the case was discovered, defendant Zhou truthfully confessed to his criminal activity; defendant Bo, after being summoned by the public security authority via phone, voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed to his criminal activity. The public security authority seized 80,000 yuan from defendant Zhou. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Bo during court proceedings, and are confirmed by their statements during the investigation phase, the statements of co-defendants Wei, Zhang, and Shi who were not present in court, identification records and photographs, a seizure list, the public security administrative penalty decision, details of arrests, household registration data, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution agency charges that: On August 18, 2015, at approximately 1:00 PM, officers from the Houmiao Police Station of the Taiqian County Public Security Bureau seized a barrel of suspected drugs at the home of the defendant Fu. Upon investigation, it was found that the drugs belonged to Fu's second elder brother, Fu A (who is being dealt with in a separate case), who had placed them in Fu's home. Additionally, Fu A instructed Fu to transfer and conceal the drugs, and Fu instructed Zhang to transfer and conceal the drugs. The seized drugs were weighed at a total of 655.94 grams, and testing confirmed the presence of methcathinone in the suspected drugs. The evidence establishing the above facts includes physical evidence; documentary evidence; testimony from the witness Zhao; confessions from the defendants Fu and Zhang; expert opinions; records of search, extraction, and identification of the scene; and audiovisual materials.


Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 2 a.m. on July 22, 2016, the defendants Huang and Du, after premeditation, arrived at the entrance of Donggeng Village Primary School in Louqiao Street, a certain district of a certain city. They attempted to steal from vehicles parked there by trying to open the car doors. However, they were unsuccessful because the doors were locked or there were no valuables inside the vehicles whose doors they managed to open. At around 3 a.m. that day, Huang and Du went to the lawn at the entrance of Chuitai Mountain Park Square in Donggeng Village, Louqiao Street. Taking advantage of the victim Guo sleeping, they stole a pack of Liqun cigarettes (containing 3 or 4 cigarettes) and an iPhone 6 (valued at 3,212 yuan) from the pocket of his pants. Later that morning, Huang and Du went to the "Apple Experience Center" on Guoding Road, Qianhua Village, Xinqiao Street, in a certain district of a certain city, where they sold the stolen phone for 1,500 yuan and shared the proceeds. After the crime, the phone was recovered and returned to the victim Guo. Huang and Du did not dispute these facts during the trial. Their actions are substantiated by Guo's testimony, the testimonies of witnesses Mother 1 and Mother 2, the price evaluation report, identification records and photos, surveillance video discs, a surveillance narrative, the list of accepted evidence, the list and photos of returned items, the arrest process, and identity verification materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that: 1. On or around June 8, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to use methamphetamine at his home. 2. On the morning of June 10, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to inject heroin at his home. 3. On the afternoon of June 10, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to inject heroin at his home. 4. On the morning of June 11, 2020, drug user Li went to defendant Zhang's home to purchase heroin. Zhang instructed defendant Gan to weigh 0.2 grams of heroin for Li, receiving 200 yuan for the transaction. Zhang allowed Li and Gan to inject heroin at his home. Later that afternoon, the police apprehended defendants Gan and Zhang and lawfully searched Gan, recovering 7 syringes and 1 electronic scale; they lawfully searched Zhang's home, recovering 8 sets of drug use tools, 1 roll of tin foil, 1 box of straws, and 1 box of transparent plastic bags. In summary, Zhang and Gan sold heroin once, totaling 0.2 grams; Zhang allowed Gan and Li to consume and inject drugs a total of 5 times.


Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, and Tan were successively deceived by online acquaintances into going to a certain place, where they joined a pyramid scheme organization called "Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Co., Ltd." They were respectively elected by the members of the organization as "Housekeeper," "Lock Leader," "Big Brother," and "Master." On May 11, 2015, the victim, Chen, was lured to the 302 room at the back door of No. 175 Yixian Road, Xiahai District, by a female netizen under the pretense of friendship. The defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, Tan, Zhao (handled in a separate case), Gan (handled in a separate case), Deng (handled in a separate case), and Yi (handled in a separate case), following the prior arrangement and onsite command of Tan Moumou (handled in a separate case), attempted to make the victim Chen subservient to management and join the pyramid scheme as soon as possible. First, Yang, Gan, and Zhao pinned Chen to the ground, and the others forcibly restrained Chen. Tan Moumou and Liao each beat and intimidated Chen so that he dared not resist. Tan Moumou promptly directed others to search Chen and take away items such as his mobile phone, ID card, and bank card. Then Yang, Zou, Liao, Tan, Zhao, Gan, Deng, and Yi were apprehended by the police at the pyramid scheme's hideout, and the victim Chen was rescued. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, and Tan during the court hearing, and they were corroborated by the victim Chen's statement, testimonies of witnesses Mo, Zhao, Gan, Deng, and Yi, the list of seized and returned items, mobile communication records, the house lease agreement, photo identification records, on-site inspection transcripts, scene diagrams and photos, the police statement, apprehension details, household registration certificates, and other evidence, sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The facts of the case as determined by the court are consistent with the charges brought by the public prosecution. It is also found that the father of the defendant Jiang has compensated the victim with 4,314 RMB through the court. The evidence supporting the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentation such as seizure and return lists, the process of bringing suspects to justice, household registration certificates, applications, etc.; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Liu and Dai, among others; 3. The statement of the victim Wang; 4. Confessions of the defendants Jiang and Cao; 5. Price appraisal reports; 6. Identification records, search records, on-site investigation records, and site diagrams; 7. On-site photos and photos of the stolen goods, etc. The above evidence corroborates each other and is sufficient to confirm the facts. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient.


The prosecution alleges: On December 10, 2015, the defendants, Dong and Li, drove a rented sedan with license plate D××××× from a certain city in a province, carrying a set of temporary emergency communication base station equipment. At around 10 a.m. on December 11, Dong and Li arrived near a district in a city of the province, using the equipment to send bank deduction text messages to unspecified individuals, and left the district at around 12 p.m. On December 12, at around 7 a.m., Dong and Li drove to a county town in a certain location and again used the base station equipment to send bank deduction text messages until around 10:40 a.m., when they were apprehended by the police at the intersection of Qin Nan Road and Tao Xi Road in the county town. According to the assessment, the equipment meets the characteristics of a pseudo base station, and a total of 13,006 fraudulent text messages were sent on December 11 and December 12, 2015.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that:

1. On January 27, 2020, the defendant Zhao stole three bottles of Hetao liquor in a basement in ×× County, and sold the stolen three bottles of Hetao liquor to Yongfu Convenience Store on Beijie Street, Zhuozi County.

2. Between January 29, 2020 and February 9, 2020, the defendant Zhao repeatedly stole items such as liquor, wine, tea leaves, and cooking oil from a basement in ×× County, and sold all the stolen goods at prices below market value to the other defendant in this case, Cheng, on Daqing Street, Zhuozi County, exchanging them for drugs (heroin) for personal use.

3. In February 2020, the defendant Zhao stole unstripped copper wire in ×× County, which weighed 50 jin after stripping.

4. From April 2019 to February 2020, the defendant Cheng repeatedly sold drugs to Zhao, Li Moumou, Cao Moumou, Mi Moumou, and Zhang Moumou.

5. From January 2020 to mid-February 2020, the defendant Cheng repeatedly purchased liquor, wine, tea leaves, and other items that the defendant Zhao stole from unit three, No. 3 building, Jiali Community, at prices below market value.


After trial, it was found that the defendant Zhang and the victim Chen had a dispute online due to disagreement in words, and they insulted each other. On June 23, 2014, at around 23:00, Zhang and Chen agreed to fight at Weishan Lake Lobster Restaurant on the south side road of Xinwen Middle School. Zhang gathered defendant Han and others to help. Zhang arrived at the scene first and engaged in a scuffle with Chen. After Han arrived at the scene, he punched Chen in the jaw, causing Chen to fall to the ground. Zhang then kicked Chen's head and body, resulting in Chen sustaining a full-layer lip laceration categorized as minor injury level two. On July 3, 2014, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered, and on October 24, 2014, defendants Zhang and Han jointly compensated Chen for various economic losses totaling 50,000 yuan, obtaining forgiveness. The defendants Zhang and Han had no objection to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and these facts were confirmed by the statement


The prosecution alleged that at around 14:00 on March 7, 2019, defendants Li, Rong, and Liu drove to a certain location in a town in a certain city (a hunting prohibited area) during the closed season and used a high-pressure air gun to hunt, illegally capturing 2 common moorhens, 1 spotted dove, and 1 mallard duck. Among them, Rong was responsible for driving the vehicle, Li hunted with the high-pressure air gun, and Liu collected the prey. According to identification by the wildlife protection station of a certain city, these 4 birds are terrestrial wildlife under national protection and are banned from hunting by the province due to their important ecological, scientific, and social research value.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that, at around 2 a.m. on July 28, 2014, in the courtyard at the south gate of the snack city on Jianshe Road in a certain town of Weishan County, defendants Zhu, Yuan, and Zhang, along with others, were having a meal together. Due to a trivial matter, Zhang and the victim, Liu, got into an argument and exchanged insults. Zhu and Yuan were dissatisfied with Liu's words and actions. Yuan chased Liu with a beer bottle, and Zhu injured Liu with a kitchen knife. Forensic examination determined Liu's injuries to be minor injuries of the first degree. Zhu also used a kitchen knife to damage the front windshield of victim Liu's vehicle. According to the appraisal by the Weishan County Price Certification Center, the total value of the damage to the front windshield was 11,760 yuan. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, related documentary evidence, as well as the defendants' confessions and defenses.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region accused that on May 6, 2012, the villagers of Nongquan Hamlet, a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, protested against the blasting operations of the Xinbao Quarry affecting their production and livelihood by blocking the construction at Xinbao Quarry. During this process, a villager named Meng pushed the Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform off a cliff, resulting in the machine being damaged. On July 18, the price certification center of a certain county, commissioned by the county's Public Security Bureau, conducted a price appraisal for the Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform, determining the damaged control platform was valued at 6,054.40 yuan. On July 27, the county's Public Security Bureau, based on this price appraisal, filed a case against Meng for suspected intentional damage to property, detained him on July 30, and executed an arrest on August 9. On September 24, Meng raised objections to the appraisal opinion issued by the county's price certification center and applied for a reappraisal. The county's price certification center immediately reorganized personnel, including the former director of the county's price bureau Liang and others such as Wei, Luo, to investigate the equipment's price in some province and county, confirming discrepancies in the original appraisal. On September 29, the county's price certification center revoked the appraisal conclusion previously issued and recommissioned the appraisal process. On September 30, the county's People's Procuratorate decided to grant bail for Meng. On March 20, 2013, the county's Public Security Bureau re-commissioned the price certification center of a district in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region to appraise the price of the involved property, which concluded on April 8, 2013, that the destroyed Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform was valued at 890 yuan. On May 7, 2013, the county's People's Procuratorate determined that the value of the damaged property in Meng's case did not meet the prosecution threshold of over 5,000 yuan and decided to drop the charges against Meng for intentional damage to property.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: The victim Zhang had a storage site for bridge materials in a village of a town in a certain county, where he employed Liu, one of the defendants, as a site administrator responsible for the safety of the materials. During the first lunar month of 2019, Liu, in collusion with another defendant, Gong, with the intent of illegal possession and through mutual conspiracy, stole fifteen steel plates from the storage site and sold them to a person named Zhu. They received a total of 10,500 yuan from this sale. Subsequently, Liu received 2,000 yuan of the illicit money, which has now been squandered, while the remaining amount was obtained by Gong. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of the county, the market value of the stolen items is 16,125 yuan. The evidence supporting the aforementioned facts includes: documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, confessions and defense statements of the defendants, inspection and identification records, appraisal opinions, and on-site investigation records. The collection procedure of the above evidence is legitimate, and the content is objective and truthful, sufficient to establish the facts charged. Defendants Liu and Gong have no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged against them, and they voluntarily plead guilty and accept punishment.


The prosecution alleges that on a day after New Year's Day 2016, in the "Southeast Circle" canal beach area of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu (already sentenced) to illegally fell 10 poplar trees belonging to victims Wei, without obtaining a forest logging permit. According to the forestry bureau of the certain county, the volume of the 10 felled poplar trees was appraised at 3.658 cubic meters. On another day after New Year's Day 2016, within the southern cemetery of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu to illegally fell 15 poplar trees belonging to Yu, without obtaining a forest logging permit. The forestry bureau of the certain county appraised the volume of the 15 felled poplar trees at 6.0047 cubic meters. On January 8 and January 9, 2016, at the "South Riverside" canal beach area of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu to illegally fell 32 poplar trees belonging to victim Liu, without obtaining a forest logging permit. According to the forestry bureau of the certain county, the volume of the 32 felled poplar trees was appraised at 10.378 cubic meters. It was further discovered that, following the incident, defendants Wu and Sun turned themselves in to the county public security bureau, truthfully confessing the main facts of the crime. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings and were substantiated by the confessions of defendants Wu and Sun, the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Wei, Yu, Li, and Wang, the on-site inspection records and photographs, schematic diagrams, appraisal by the county forestry bureau, arrest process records, the criminal judgment, and residency proofs of defendants Wu and Sun, which are sufficient to affirm the charges.


Upon trial, it was found that on August 17, 2015, defendants Zhou and Deng used police identification holder purchased to impersonate police officers and confiscated the victim Luo's electric scooter by the roadside of Heping Road in a new district of a certain place. They later sold the scooter for a profit of 600 yuan, which they split equally. On September 10, 2015, Zhou and Deng used the same method to confiscate the victim Zhang's electric scooter at a bus stop in Qinghu Zhenhua Industrial Zone in a new district of a certain place, later selling it for a profit of 700 yuan, with Zhou receiving 400 yuan and Deng receiving 300 yuan.

On the afternoon of October 25, 2015, defendants Zhou and He used the same method near the Qinghu subway station in a new district of a certain place to seize an electric scooter and later collected 370 yuan from the victim. Around 4 p.m. on October 25, 2015, Zhou and He used the same method to confiscate the victim Chen's electric scooter by the roadside of Baoneng Science and Technology Park in Qinghu of a new district of a certain place, with Zhou hiding the scooter in his home. Around 5 p.m. on October 25, 2015, He was apprehended by the public and reported to the police. Based on He's statement, the police apprehended Zhou and, subsequently based on Zhou's statement, apprehended Deng.

All three defendants raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and relevant evidence was presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: From early June to July 17, 2020, the defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang agreed beforehand to divide the work and share the profits equally. Yang was responsible for driving, Shi for contacting the suppliers and setting up the "Luomanbao" equipment, and Jia for testing the phone cards. The defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang drove to various provinces and locations, purchasing "Luomanbao," phone cards, switches, and other equipment online to build "communication relay stations." They sent the account name and password of the "Luomanbao" to overseas fraud groups for them to make remote calls, displaying false caller ID locations to carry out scams. The defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang illegally profited over 260,000 RMB from these activities. Among the numerous numbers used by the defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang in operating the Luomanbao equipment for the scammers, the police verified that they defrauded victims such as Sun and Liu of over 920,000 RMB. After the crime was uncovered, defendants Shi and Jia truthfully confessed their crimes; Shi and Jia respectively returned illegal gains of 6,000 RMB and 116,172 RMB. To prove the aforementioned facts, the public prosecutor interrogated the defendants in court and presented evidence including the defendants' confessions and defenses during police investigation, witness testimonies, search records, seizure warrants, lists of seized items, notices for obtaining evidence, lists of received evidence materials, WeChat chat screenshots, Alipay and WeChat transfer records, bank transaction details, arrest process records, and household registration information.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that on April 10, 2015, at around 5:00 PM, the defendants Xue and Bao took Bus No. 12 to a stop near Shengshi Spring Bus Station in Xingqing District, Yinchuan City. When a fellow passenger, Ye, was not paying attention, they stole a wallet that contained 81 yuan in cash as well as bank cards and a social security card. After the case was solved, the stolen items were recovered and returned.


Upon trial, it was found that between February 2013 and March 18, 2014, the defendants Shi and his wife Wu rented a factory building in a certain village in a district of a city to operate a hardware blackening processing factory without a business license. They discharged wastewater and waste acid produced during the production process into the surface ground through a sedimentation tank without treatment, without obtaining environmental impact approval documents and without any sewage treatment equipment. During this period, defendant Shi was responsible for business negotiations and daily management; defendant Wu assisted Shi in tasks such as dumping products and applying oil when the workload was heavy. According to monitoring by the Environmental Protection Monitoring Station in a district of a city, the indicators of total zinc, total nickel, and total chromium in the wastewater discharged by this processing factory did not meet standards, exceeding the first-class standard in the "Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard" GB8978-1996 by more than three times, which severely polluted the environment. On March 18, 2014, the defendants Shi and Wu were apprehended by the police at a certain village in a district of a city. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Shi and Wu during the trial, and are substantiated by testimonies from witnesses Xiang, Hong, and Xu; on-site inspection records; Monitoring Report No. 87 (2014) Water by the Environmental Protection Monitoring Station in a district of a city; the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department's approval of Monitoring Report No. 87 (2014) Water; site photos; on-site sampling video CD; case transfer letter; explanation of circumstances; and identification documents of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial, it was ascertained that around 10 p.m. on June 2, 2015, the defendants Pang and Deng, along with another man, had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim, taxi driver Zhao, at the intersection of Longma City on Cuiwei East Road in Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City. Subsequently, defendant Pang used a frying pan and, together with defendant Deng and the other man, assaulted the victim Zhao, causing Zhao to suffer fractures of the 9th and 10th ribs on the right side, as well as injuries around the right eye and waist (as determined by an appraisal, the injuries inflicted on Zhao were categorized as second-degree minor injuries). On June 15, 2015, defendants Pang and Deng compensated the victim Zhao for economic losses amounting to 30,000 RMB, after which Zhao expressed understanding towards them. On June 16, 2015, defendants Pang and Deng surrendered to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Pang and Deng during the trial proceedings, and are corroborated by the statements and identification records of the victim Zhao, the testimony of witness Huang, the surrender statement, the forensic appraisal of bodily injuries, household registration information, and evidence such as photographs of the scene and surveillance videos, which are sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of Xiaodian District, a certain city, charges that on April 12, 2015, at around 12:18 pm, at the restaurant in the administrative building of Shanxi Dayi Hospital on Longcheng Street, Xiaodian District, the defendants Zhang and Du, while dining, took advantage of the victim Li's inattention while eating in the restaurant to steal a wallet that had fallen from Li's shoulder bag to the ground. The stolen wallet contained 2000 yuan in cash, an identity card, a social security card, and other belongings. The stolen property has now been returned to the victim, and the defendants have obtained the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by evidence including the victim's report and statement record, the details of the arrest, a list of seized and returned items, video materials, a letter of forgiveness, the defendants' confessions, and their identification.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Nanjing City accused that in order to collect a debt, defendants Wang and Zhou, upon arrangement by defendant Wang, had defendant Zhou and others take the victim, Sun, to Room A-401, No. 72 Huju North Road, Gulou District, in the city for detention at around 12:00 on September 25, 2013, in a Walmart parking lot in a certain district of the city. Defendant Wan, at around 22:00 on the same day, was arranged by defendant Wang to join defendant Zhou in detaining the victim, Sun. At around 17:00 on September 27 of the same year, the victim Sun issued an IOU to defendant Wang, after which defendant Wang intended to let the victim Sun leave. However, defendant Zhou, due to unresolved debt issues with Sun, continued to detain the victim Sun at the aforementioned location along with defendant Wan. At around 17:00 on September 28 of the same year, the victim Sun was rescued by the police, and defendants Zhou and Wan were arrested by the police at the aforementioned location. On November 21 of the same year, defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the three defendants were brought to justice, they all truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the court trial, there were no objections from defendants Wang, Zhou, and Wan regarding the above facts, which were substantiated by a list of collected evidence, call records, explanatory notes, and other documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Yi, Chen, Liu, and Lü; statements from victim Sun; on-site inspection records, examination records, details of the arrest, accounts of how they were brought to justice, prior criminal records, household registration data and other evidence produced by a branch of the Nanjing Public Security Bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city accused that on the morning of November 15, 2016, the defendants Chen, Dong, Luo, Liu, and Hu, along with Ding (who is being handled in a separate case), drove a truck with the license plate Su H××××× to the dormitory of the Silk Weaving Factory on Hong Kong Road, Wangying Town, in a certain district of a certain city to dismantle China Telecom cables. During this process, defendant Dong discovered that there were cables in use belonging to the Huaian branch of China Mobile Tietong Co., Ltd. Subsequently, defendants Dong, Chen, Luo, Hu, and Liu dismantled these cables without permission and sold part of the cables, splitting the proceeds among themselves. According to an appraisal, the value of the stolen cables was 2,517 RMB. After the incident, the five defendants were apprehended and summoned by the public security authorities on December 27 and 28, 2016. After being brought to justice, they were all able to truthfully confess the facts of the crime. Additionally, the defendant's boss, Shi (1), has compensated the victim unit for the loss, and the victim unit expressed understanding of the defendants' actions. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Dong, Chen, Luo, Liu, and Hu during the court proceedings. Furthermore, there was supporting evidence from the testimony of Li, the litigation representative of the victim unit; testimonies from unnamed witnesses Shi (1), Jiang, Liu, Shen, Shi (2), Zhou, and others who were not present in court; engineering diagrams of the cable lines provided by China Mobile Tietong; identification records; on-site inspection records; price appraisal reports; receipts; letters of understanding; statements from the Huaian District Public Security Bureau of a certain city; as well as evidence of the case proceedings, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: From January to March 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and others engaged in theft on buses, and Liu drove a car to follow the buses and assist. They stole mobile phones, cash, and other items with a total value of 10,786 RMB. After the incident, all the stolen property was recovered. The specific details are as follows: 1. On the afternoon of January 1, 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and another individual engaged in theft on a bus. Liu drove a car to follow and assist, and on bus route No. 2, they stole cash totaling over 700 RMB and one gold Apple brand mobile phone (worth 4,950 RMB) from the victim Chen, with a total value of over 5,650 RMB. 2. On March 12, 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and two others engaged in theft on a bus. Liu drove a car to follow and assist, and on bus route No. 2, they stole one gold Apple brand mobile phone from the victim Li, worth 2,856 RMB. 3. Subsequently, Tang, in conspiracy with others, engaged in theft on a bus, and Liu drove a car to follow and assist, stealing one rose gold OPPO brand mobile phone from the victim Huang on bus route No. 5, worth 2,280 RMB. In response to the facts of the above accusations, the prosecution presented relevant evidence to prove these charges.


The People's Procuratorate of Longgang District in a certain city charged that on February 21, 2014, an individual named Su contacted defendant Liu to purchase drugs. Defendant Liu then contacted another defendant, Mo, through Su A (handled in a separate case) to buy drugs for resale. At approximately 11 p.m. on the same day, defendant Liu and Su A arrived at the intersection of XX Road in XX Community, Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District, a certain city, to meet Su. After receiving 200 yuan from Su as payment for the drugs, Liu proceeded to a nearby alley at No. X, Lane XX, XX Community, Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District, to purchase a small packet of methamphetamine from defendant Mo for selling to Su. At around 11:20 p.m., as defendant Liu returned to the Biling intersection to deliver the drugs to Su, he was apprehended by the police. The officers seized 0.36 grams of methamphetamine that he intended to sell. After being captured, defendant Liu, seeking to make a meritorious contribution, voluntarily confessed that the drugs he intended to sell were obtained from defendant Mo and led the police to Mo's small shop to arrest him. An appraisal confirmed that the seized drugs weighed 0.36 grams and contained methamphetamine.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges the following: 1. On April 18, 2019, defendants Li and Lu organized a group of people to gamble by playing "a certain type of poker" in a certain district of a certain city, garnering over 30,000 RMB in profits from rake-offs. During this time, defendant Ma was responsible for managing the chips and other tasks, and defendant Lu provided the venue. 2. On April 20 of the same year, defendants Li and Lu organized another group of people to gamble by playing "a certain type of poker" in a certain district of a certain city, obtaining more than 70,000 RMB in profits from rake-offs. During this period, defendant Ma was responsible for managing the chips and other tasks; defendant Dan helped arrange the venue and the card dealers; defendant Ying was responsible for dealing the cards and handling the rake-offs, involving over 50,000 RMB in rake-offs; defendant Liu was responsible for dealing the cards and handling the rake-offs, involving over 10,000 RMB in rake-offs.


Upon examination, it was found that the defendants Cui and Zhang are friends. Between April 18 and April 26, 2020, defendants Cui and Zhang distributed and posted pre-made cards and stickers containing their personal WeChat QR code and the download QR code for the XinHao WanFeng International app in various locations, including some neighborhoods such as Wangfu Jiayuan, Fuguiyuan, Xingdong Phase II, Dongguan Xincun, Baodi, Qinghua Garden, Xuefu Garden, Mudanyuan, Xingdong Jiayuan, Guangshengde, and Lijing Garden. The purpose was to promote the XinHao WanFeng International gambling website; participants would download the gambling site and recharge. Cui would receive a rebate of 0.8% of the recharge amount from the site. By the time Cui was arrested, Cui and Zhang had distributed 6,655 cards and stickers and had earned a rebate of 193 yuan, with more than 300 undistributed stickers found. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Cui and Zhang during the trial. The facts were also supported by the prosecution's presentation of evidence, which was uncontested during cross-examination, including two mobile phones, the decision to file the case, household registration information, details of the arrest, 345 gambling-related advertisement stickers, Cui's Alipay transaction records, witness testimony from Cao, on-site inspection records from Cui and Zhang’s homes, audiovisual materials on video discs, and confessions from defendants Cui and Zhang, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution authority charges that in the early morning of October 27, 2015, defendants Li and Deng conspired to go to Kunhe Bath Center next to Aiyimei Hotel in Jinping Street, a certain city. Taking advantage of the fact that the bath center was unstaffed due to an inspection, they stole a total of more than 4,500 RMB in cash from the lockers in the technicians' room on the second floor, which belonged to victims Yao, Zhang (1), Chen (1), Yang, Zhang (2), Luo, Yao (2), and Tan. On October 28, 2015, the police arrested defendant Li near Aiyimei Hotel. On May 3, 2016, defendant Deng turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities after being apprehended. After the incident, the stolen goods were returned to the victims. Defendant Li and Deng raised no objection to these facts during the court trial, and the facts are substantiated by the statements of victims Yao, Zhang (1), Chen (1), Yang, Zhang (2), Luo, Yao (2), Tan, and the testimonies of witnesses Deng, Chen (3), and Chen (2), as well as on-site identification records and photos, personal identification records and photos, seizure lists, return lists, photos, explanatory notes, population information, and records of how they were brought to justice, which are sufficient to make a conviction. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution suggests sentencing defendant Li to detention for four to six months and a fine; and suggests sentencing defendant Deng to detention for three to five months and a fine.


The prosecution alleges that defendant Chen is the owner of the XX Bakery in the Henan Community, Jiangkou Town, Fengkai County, and defendant Li is the wife of defendant Chen. The two jointly operate the XX Bakery. The XX Bakery has been in operation since 1995, producing and wholesaling steamed buns to retailers in certain locations. Despite the notice issued by the Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration in May 2014, clearly informing them not to add aluminum-containing food additives in their food production, defendants Chen and Li still used the aluminum-containing additive "Osmanthus" brand sweet baking powder to make steamed buns and sold them to retailers. On April 14, 2015, staff from the Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration inspected the XX Bakery, sampled the steamed buns it produced and sold, and seized a batch of "Osmanthus" brand sweet baking powder and a bottle of lemon yellow coloring. According to the inspection by the Quality Supervision Department, the sampled steamed buns had an aluminum content of 152.43 mg/kg, which is an unqualified product. Defendant Chen and Li have not disputed the above facts during the trial. Additionally, there are pieces of evidence such as the case registration form and filing decision, the process of arrest, household registration proof, criminal record inquiry, testimonies of witnesses Ou, Hou, Liu, relevant administrative materials transferred by Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration, inspection record, copies of the individual business license and food circulation permit, Inspection Report from Zhaoqing City Quality and Metrology Supervision and Testing Institute of Guangdong Province, on-site inspection record and photos, and confessions of defendants Chen and Li, which are sufficient to establish conviction.


The prosecution alleges: On February 1, 2016, at approximately 2 PM, defendants Tan, Wei, and Wen were arranged by "Brother Li" to gather gamblers for gambling in a house located at No. 50, Group 3, Ghegujiang Xincun, Changtang Town, Liubei District, Liuzhou City. Defendant Tan was responsible for running the "He Li" inside the house, while defendants Wei and Wen were responsible for keeping watch outside the house.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: In the first half of 2015, the Agriculture Committee and the Finance Bureau of a certain county included hickory husks as part of the scope for subsidy for solidified utilization as straw energy, with a subsidy standard of 150 yuan/ton. In April 2015, the defendants Sun and Huang, using the name of the Jinfu Company, signed a "Comprehensive Utilization (Acquisition) Framework Agreement for Straw" with a township and a town in the county. In August 2015, they again signed a "Comprehensive Utilization (Acquisition) Framework Agreement for Straw" with the same township and town. By forging transporters' signatures and asking transporters to sign more than necessary on the "Comprehensive Utilization of Straw Transportation Status Table of XX Town, a certain county," they falsely reported a total of 4,847 tons of hickory husks collected, transported, and utilized (reported a total of 6,347 tons of hickory husks, but only 1,500 tons were actually collected), and created false company warehouse entry records, thus fraudulently obtaining fiscal incentive funds amounting to 727,000 yuan. Of this, defendant Huang received 220,000 yuan of the illicit money, while the remaining funds stayed with Jinfu Company. To support the above charges, the prosecution has presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses by the defendants, search records, and other evidences for corroboration.


The trial established that at around 9 p.m. on October 21, 2013, in the "Keda Internet Cafe" on the second floor of Baijihui Plaza in Changle County, the victim, Li Moujia, found the game sounds from Wei to be too loud and had a dispute with him. Due to verbal disagreements, the defendants, Zhang Moujia (already sentenced), Wei, and Liang, injured the victims Li Moujia, Xue Moujia, and Xue Mouyi. According to the forensic examination by the Changle County Public Security Bureau, the injuries of Li Moujia and Xue Mouyi were classified as minor injuries. In 2008, defendant Wei was subjected to one year of labor reeducation for picking quarrels and provoking trouble. The victims, Li Moujia, Xue Mouyi, and Xue Moujia, reached a settlement agreement with the defendants Zhang Moujia, Wei, and Liang's families. Defendants Zhang Moujia and Wei compensated the three victims a total of 12,000 yuan for economic losses, and defendant Liang compensated the three victims 5,000 yuan for economic losses. The three victims expressed understanding towards the actions of the defendants Zhang Moujia, Wei, and Liang and suggested the court impose lenient or exempt criminal punishment on the defendants. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Liang during the trial. These facts were corroborated by the confessions of the co-defendant Zhang Moujia, statements from the victims Li Moujia, Xue Mouyi, and Xue Moujia, witness testimonies, forensic medical injury assessment from the Changle County Public Security Bureau, notification of assessment conclusions, administrative penalty decision, details of capture, previous conviction records, household registration proof, the settlement agreement, and letters of understanding, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that during the period from April 8 to April 16, 2015, the defendants Huang, Hong, and Wu were hired at a daily wage of 80 yuan to set up a gambling operation on a vacant lot next to Dongfeng Market in Xiasan District, a city. They used dice for gambling in the “Fish-Prawn-Crab” style. Among them, defendant Huang was responsible for being the banker, defendant Hong was responsible for handling numbers, and defendant Wu was responsible for looking out. The gambling den gathered several gamblers daily for gambling activities. A man nicknamed "Duck" (handled in another case) was in charge of managing the casino's profits and paying the wages of the three defendants. On April 16, 2015, at around 11 a.m., defendants Huang and Hong were caught by the police while gambling at the casino with gamblers Li, Chen Yi, Lü Yi, Lin, and others. The police seized gambling funds amounting to 834 yuan and a batch of gambling tools on the spot. Later that day, around 4 p.m., the police arrested defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang, Hong, and Wu during the court trial. The testimonies of witnesses Li, Chen Yi, Lü Yi, and Lin, as well as identification records, inspection records, search records, inventory of confiscated items, photographs of seized items, on-site investigation records and photographs, electronic surveillance video screenshots, confessions of the three defendants, the arrest process, and basic resident information provided by the police, all serve as evidence sufficient to substantiate the case.


After trial and investigation, it was found that in early September 2014, the defendant Yan wanted to make money by producing and selling counterfeit cigarettes. He purchased individual cigarettes, packaging paper, shrink film, and packaging boxes, and contacted the defendant Wang to help find workers for packaging the counterfeit cigarettes. Defendant Wang brought defendants Lian, Zhang, and Li to Yan's rented house in a certain village of a certain county in a certain city. The five defendants, knowing they had not obtained a license, began processing counterfeit "Great Hall of the People" cigarettes on September 9th. They had not yet sold them when they were discovered on September 10th. The Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of the city seized 134 cartons of "Great Hall of the People" (hard red), 276.6 cartons of "Great Hall of the People" (from a certain place), 34.6 cartons of "Great Hall of the People" (soft), 135,000 loose cigarettes, and tools used for the crime, and transferred them to the New City Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city. According to the appraisal by the Tobacco Quality Testing Station of Hebei Province, the cigarettes they processed were counterfeit registered trademarks and substandard cigarettes. The valuation by the Hebei Tobacco Monopoly Bureau determined the value of the counterfeit cigarettes to be 173,709 yuan. The above facts were not contested by the five defendants, who expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The case is corroborated by evidence such as the process of arrest, case resolution, appraisal opinions, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found: Since 2012, "Tong" (at large) rented the fourth floor of "Some Grand Hotel" located in a certain district's street office to operate a bath center, hiring Ran and Li to be responsible for daily operations. On May 8, 2014, at around 20:00, police officers conducted a routine inspection at the hotel and discovered Wang and Hu engaged in prostitution activities in a private room. Ran, Li, and the waiter Wang, who introduced two prostitutes to customers that night, were arrested on the spot. 4,615 yuan in prostitution fees were seized. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial and were substantiated by the report materials; testimonies from witnesses Wang, Hu, Ding, Gao, and others; site identification records and photos; identification transcripts; the arrest process; administrative penalty decision; and household registration proof of the three defendants, which are indeed comprehensive and sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination and verification: From June 2013 until the case was uncovered, defendants Peng and Qin, while serving as the Planning and Customer Service Manager and Regional Sales Director of A Fragrance (China) Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as "Company A"), respectively, exploited the job convenience of Peng, who managed the warehouse. Qin contacted buyers to illicitly remove lemon oil terpenes worth RMB 225,610 stored in the warehouse from the company and sold them through others to a person named Zheng. The proceeds were misappropriated for their personal use. On October 29, 2014, defendants Peng and Qin surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. After the case was uncovered, both defendants returned all the illicit gains and obtained Company A's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Peng and Qin during court proceedings. Additionally, these facts were substantiated by the business license, job application form, labor contract, specific job descriptions, and letter of forgiveness provided by Company A; statements from the victim unit's employees, Ren and Qian; testimonies from witnesses Cai, Zheng, Wang, and He; the explanatory note, sales invoices provided by B Fragrance (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; and bank account details of Cai, Cai Jia, and Qin, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain banner charged that on October 11, 2020, the Hanshan Police Station of the Forest Public Security Bureau of a certain banner received a report from the public that a pickup truck was engaged in hunting in the East Mountain Valley of a certain place in the banner. The police immediately went to the scene and later found four defendants one mile north of a certain village in a certain town. In the back of the pickup truck driven by Hou, they discovered suspected game: 18 sand partridges and 3 pheasants. They also found a stainless steel slingshot, two slingshot rubber bands, and 233 slingshot steel balls in the vehicle. During questioning, the four people truthfully confessed to the criminal facts: the defendant Hou was responsible for driving his own white Great Wall pickup truck, license plate ×××; the defendants Guo and Wang were responsible for using a slingshot to shoot steel balls to hunt 21 wild animals; and the defendant Feng was responsible for retrieving the game. The National Forestry and Grassland Administration's Wildlife Testing Center was commissioned to conduct a species identification of the 21 game items involved in the case. The identification revealed that all 18 were Phasianidae Tibetan Snowcocks, and the other 3 were Phasianidae pheasants. After the incident, the defendant Guo reported and exposed the criminal behavior of others, which the investigative authorities verified as true. A case has been filed regarding these criminal behaviors, and compulsory measures have been taken against the criminal suspects.


After trial, it was found that during January 2013 and the period from May to August 2013, the defendants Chen and Wu, together with Wu B, Wang, Yin, Zheng, Wu A, Ge (all handled in separate cases), and "A" (identity not verified), set up stalls multiple times near Donghu, the entrance of the small commodities market, and near Taizhou Hospital in the ancient city district of a certain city. They engaged in fraudulent gambling using a game called "Wuliu" or "Tianfu". During their participation, defendants Wu and Chen illegally gained approximately 9,000 yuan in total, with each receiving about 1,500 yuan from the illegal proceeds.

On March 3, 2014, defendants Chen and Wu voluntarily reported to the Xunqiao Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed their crimes. During the trial, defendants Chen and Wu each returned 1,500 yuan of illegal proceeds to this court. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Chen and Wu during the trial, and were corroborated by the statement of the victim Feng, the testimonies of witnesses Ding and Kang, the confessions of the co-perpetrators Wu B, Wang, Yin, Zheng, Wu A, and Ge, identification records, restitution receipts, the account of their surrender, and household registration certificates. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to establish the facts.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: On the evening of January 3, 2015, the defendant Xiao proposed to the defendant Chen to steal a certain Du, who was being fostered at the home of villager Xiao A in a certain village in a certain town, from the victim Huang. Chen agreed. At about 4 a.m. the next day, Xiao drove his moped, carrying Chen to the crime scene. Chen acted as a lookout, while Xiao climbed through a window into the house and stole Du. It has been appraised that this certain Du is valued at 3,980 yuan. It was further found that after the crime, the defendants Xiao and Chen had obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Chen during the trial, and were confirmed by physical evidence; documentary evidence; witness testimony; victim statements; expert opinions, and the defendants' confessions, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that since 2014, defendant Zheng has illegally issued high-interest loans to individuals such as Zeng, Xie, Li A, Wei B, Li 11, and Hou. To forcibly collect debts, Zheng gathered Jiao, Hu 1, Ding, and others, using violence, threats, and other methods to engage in illegal detention, picking quarrels and provoking trouble, and forced transactions, behaving unlawfully, disrupting economic and social order, and resulting in a significant negative social impact, forming a gang known for evil activities.

1. Facts of illegal detention and forced transactions:
In March 2013 and March 2014, defendant Zheng lent money to Zeng on multiple occasions. Later, when Zeng was unable to repay, he fled to avoid the debt. One afternoon in August 2015, Zheng and Hu 1 found Zeng at the parking lot of Dongfang Hawaii Bathing Center in a certain city and took him to Ruitong Trading Co., Ltd. in a certain county (hereinafter referred to as Ruitong Compan


Upon trial, it was established that the defendants Chen and Huang were friends. Huang purchased 5 small packets of drugs from a certain place at a price of 65 yuan per packet. In order to earn some living expenses, the two decided to sell the aforementioned drugs. On the afternoon of March 19, 2015, around 16:00, the informant Zhang contacted Chen via QQ chat and agreed to buy four packets of "pork" (a code name for "methamphetamine") at a price of 200 yuan per packet. Subsequently, police arranged for Zhan (female) to call Chen and set up a drug transaction at the True Kung Fu restaurant at Gushu One Road, Gushu Huating, Xixiang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. At approximately 19:00 that day, Chen and Huang arrived at the agreed location to meet with Zhan. As they were preparing to make the transaction, the police apprehended Chen and Huang on the spot, and found five small packets of suspected drugs on Huang. Upon examination, the drugs sold by Chen and Huang were found to have a net weight of 3.76 grams, and all tested positive for methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Huang during the trial, and were corroborated by the relevant evidence subjected to cross-examination during the hearing, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of the First District of a certain city charges that: Between January and February 2016, the defendants Xie and Li conspired to commit theft. They subsequently broke into restaurants in a certain town of the city multiple times to steal mobile phones and cash, with the total amounting to 9,310 RMB. The specific criminal facts are as follows:

1. At around 4 a.m. on January 17, 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Impression Chengdu Restaurant operated by the victim Hu on Dexi Road in a certain town, stealing 4,000 RMB and one HTC mobile phone (valued at 760 RMB), which they later sold. After the case was solved, the phone was recovered and returned to the victim, while the stolen money was not recovered.

2. In the early morning one day in early February 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Jiaxing Restaurant operated by the victim Tan on Zhenxing North Road in a certain town, stealing 30 RMB. They also stole 50 RMB from an establishment operated by the victim Zhu in Heji. After the case was solved, the stolen money was not recovered.

3. At around 3 a.m. on February 16, 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Hemei Kejia Restaurant operated by the victim Zhao on Nantan Road in a certain town of a city, stealing 2,300 RMB in cash and 9 mobile phones (valued at 2,170 RMB), which they later sold. After the case was solved, all phones were recovered and returned to the victims, while the stolen money was not recovered.

On February 28 of the same year, at around midnight, police officers apprehended the defendants Xie and Li at the Hengtian Internet Cafe in a certain town. After being brought to justice, Xie and Li truthfully confessed to the above facts. The defendants Xie and Li raised no objections during the court hearing, and the facts are substantiated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victim Chen, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert opinions, as well as records of inspection, examination, identification, and audio-visual materials, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution alleges: 1. On the afternoon of May 4, 2013, defendants Feng and Zhang, after prior consultation, had Feng use QQ chat to arrange a meeting with victim Qian at a certain town. Feng then took Qian to a room at the Juyuan Inn, located at No. 133 Xixijie, in the town. During this time, defendant Feng exploited Qian's desire to engage in sexual activities by luring Qian to the bathroom to shower. Feng then took the opportunity to steal Qian's belongings left in the room: a white iPad 3 tablet (valued at 2,210 yuan, case valued at 34 yuan), a black Apple 4 phone (valued at 1,500 yuan), a white Sony H36L phone (valued at 3,840 yuan), and 1,100 yuan in cash. After succeeding, defendant Feng immediately fled the inn and met defendant Zhang at the Xitang Deyi Fort fast food restaurant, where he changed clothes provided by Zhang, and then returned to a rented room in Dacertain with Zhang. The stolen items were assessed to have a total value of 8,684 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of April 16, 2013, defendants Feng and Zhang, after prior consultation, had Feng use QQ chat to arrange a meeting with victim Yao at a certain town. Feng then brought Yao to a room at the Longfeng Hotel in the town. During this time, defendant Feng exploited Yao's desire to engage in sexual activities by luring Yao to the bathroom to shower. Feng then took the opportunity to steal Yao's belongings left in the room: a black Apple 4S phone (valued at 3,570 yuan) and over 700 yuan in cash. After succeeding, defe


The People's Procuratorate of Rongshui Miao Autonomous County charged that on October 4, 2015, the defendant Ming provided the money and the defendant Lei used an identification card to register and check into room 508 at the Holiday Hotel in Rongshui Town, Rongshui Miao Autonomous County. They allowed drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin to stay in the room to use the drug methamphetamine together. At around 3 a.m. the next day, the defendants Ming and Lei, along with drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin, were apprehended by the Rongshui County Public Security personnel, and 2.64 grams of drugs were seized on-site. Upon evaluation, the aforementioned drugs tested positive for methamphetamine. Urine tests for methamphetamine-related substances showed that the urine of defendants Ming, Lei, and drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin all tested positive. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the afternoon of October 25, 2012, the defendants Zhu and Wei, along with others, went to the entrance of the Postal Savings Bank on Dongxing Road in Pingyao Town, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City. They first used fake gold ingots and golden Buddhas to attract the attention of the victim, Su, and then, on the pretext of pawning the fake gold ingots and gold Buddhas for travel expenses, deceived victim Su out of 19,700 RMB. After the incident, some of the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victim Su. Around 11 a.m. the next day, the defendants Zhu and Wei, along with others, went to a location near the Cultural Center Square in Yinong Town, a district in Hangzhou City, and used the same method to defraud the victim Huang of 1,000 RMB. Subsequently, when the defendants Zhu, Wei, and others used the same method to defraud the victim Shu near the farmers' market in Dangwan Town of a certain district, they were caught by the police on the spot.


The People's Procuratorate of Liujjiang County in a certain region charges that on May 19, 2015, at approximately 2:00 a.m., the defendants Shi, Wei, and Meng, after planning, drove a motorcycle from a certain city to a town near the Eastern Fourth Lane Market of Huayuan in a specific area. Wei and Meng were responsible for keeping watch, while Shi used tools to steal a Wuling small van with the license plate Gui B×××××, which belonged to the victim Qin, parked at that location. The stolen vehicle was then driven to an orchard on a hill in a village of a certain township to be hidden. The value of the stolen vehicle was 14,280 yuan. On May 21, 2015, the defendants Shi, Wei, and Meng were arrested, and the police lawfully seized the stolen Wuling small van involved in the case. After the case was solved, the stolen Wuling van was lawfully returned to the victim, Qin. Further investigation revealed that defendant Shi was previously convicted of x crime and was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison and fined 30,000 yuan by the People’s Court of Liunan District of a certain city on November 6, 2012. On December 28, 2014, the Intermediate People’s Court of a certain city ruled on parole with Criminal Ruling No. 7515, 2014, and Shi's parole period was from December 28, 2014, to November 22, 2016. The actual time served was two years, nine months, and six days, and the unserved time was one year, eleven months, and twenty-four days. The aforesaid facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and they were corroborated by evidence such as victim statements, defendant confessions, on-site investigation, identification records and photos, details of the case, household registration information, criminal judgments, criminal rulings, and the parole certificate, which are sufficient to ascertain these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a Certain County Accuses: I. Zhang, Zhou, Chen Gather for Fighting and Qiu for Intentional Injury. On the night of September 12, 2017, defendant Zhang had a dispute over the phone with Ji (A), who was sentenced in another case, because he did not assist Zhang with an internet loan application. Mao (also handled in another case) called Ji (A) to question him, which led to an argument. Defendants Zhang, Mao, and Ji (A) agreed to bring people to a certain town in the county for a fight. Zhang and Mao then gathered defendants Zhou, Chen, Wang (under 16), Ji, Zhou (A), and Liu (B) (all three handled in separate cases) and prepared several machetes and other tools. They drove two cars from Fucheng Street in the county to a certain town. Ji (A) gathered defendants Qiu, Zhang (A) (under 16), Zhang (F) (handled in a separate case), and Zhang (C) (handled in another case), bringing two spears and machetes to wait at Open Avenue in the town. That evening, upon meeting, Mao instructed Zhou, Chen, and Ji to attack the other party with machetes and other tools. Ji (A) directed Qiu, Zhang (A), and others to attack the opposing side. Zhou insulted and hit Qiu in the face with a machete, while Qiu stabbed Zhou in the abdomen with a spear. Chen, Ji, Wang, and others inflicted machete injuries to Qiu's buttocks and waist. During the incident, Zhang witnessed the fight but did not intervene until after the consequences occurred. Ji (A) escaped the scene being chased by the op


Upon trial and investigation, it was found that during the day on April 29, 2015, defendant Ge had a dispute with Jiang (already sentenced) at Tianli Garment Co., Ltd. in a certain town of a certain city over work issues. At around 9:30 PM that evening, defendant Ge gathered defendant Zou, as well as Liu, Ran, and Li A (all already sentenced), while Jiang gathered defendants Zhang, Niu, Yang, and others at the Cross-Century Hualian Supermarket on the south side of the East-West Avenue in a certain town of a certain city for negotiations. As the negotiations failed, both parties engaged in a brawl using plastic pipes, wooden sticks, brooms, steel pipes, and other implements, leading to injuries to Li B and Zhang A. According to the forensic identification by the Judicial Identification Center of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau, the injuries to Li B's mouth and Zhang A's head were minor. The aforementioned criminal facts were undisputed by all five defendants during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as case registration forms, accomplice confessions, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, forensic medical injury assessment reports, on-site investigation data, account of the incident, criminal judgments on accomplices, check of criminal backgrounds, and identification documents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that around 3 a.m. on November 15, 2018, the defendant Li, upon invitation by his female friend Shen1, went with the defendant Lin to Room 111 on the first floor of "Candy" KTV on Wenguan Road, Chenghua Street, Chenghai District to drink and sing. During the gathering, defendant Guan became displeased because Li and Shen1 were sitting together chatting for a long time. Defendant Guan then gathered defendant Chen and Lin A (handled in a separate case) to the scene. Defendant Guan led defendant Chen and Lin A into the room, picked up an empty beer bottle from the table, and threw it at Li, subsequently beating Li, causing Li to suffer injuries and bleeding from the face. Lin, Shen1, and others intervened to dissuade them, at which point defendants Guan and Chen, among others, used broken beer bottle fragments to beat Lin, causing Lin to sustain injuries and bleeding on the arm. Defendants Guan and Chen then left the room. After the departure of Guan and his group, defendants Li and Lin, feeling indignant, picked up broken beer bottle fragments from the floor inside the room and rushed outside. Defendant Li attacked Chen, resulting in an injury to Chen's hand. Defendant Lin, holding a broken beer bottle fragment, hooked it around Guan's neck and dragged him to the entrance of "Candy" KTV. Li again rushed forward along with Lin to assault Guan, causing injuries and bleeding to Guan's head and arms. Security personnel later intervened to disperse them, with Guan and


The public prosecution agency charges that on May 17, 2016, at around 10:40 am, the defendants Tan and Qian discussed together at a certain store on Guoqing Road Pedestrian Street in this city and took advantage to steal one gold bracelet and one pair of sunglasses placed on the counter by the victim Chen. The total value amounted to 10,291.8 RMB. After being brought to justice, defendants Tan and Qian truthfully confessed their crimes. Tan and Qian have reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim Chen, fulfilled it, and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Qian during the court trial. Additionally, the victim Chen's statement, testimonies from witness Chen A and others, the price appraisal conclusion, lists of seizures and returns, the evidence retrieval list, photos, the civil compensation agreement, the criminal judgment, the explanation of how the case was solved, and the household registration certificates serve as evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that around 16:00 on November 20, 2013, the Public Security Bureau's Security Division in a certain city discovered that someone was operating a casino using video game machines next to the Hangxin Hotel on Wuyi Road in the Jiangnan District of that city. The police then sealed off the casino and arrested Yang, who collected money for the casino, Li and Deng, who acted as lookouts for the casino, and Zhou, the casino manager. They also seized 27 baccarat gambling machines and one main machine used for gambling. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang, Li, Deng, and Zhou during the trial. They were substantiated by evidence including the registration form for receiving the case, the decision to file a case, the process of arrest, the list of seized items and documents, the appraisal report of the video game machines, identification transcripts and photos of the identified persons, the criminal case scene identification transcript, photos of the identification scene, testimonies of witnesses Lu, Liang, and Huang, household registration certificates, explanations of the situation, and the confessions of defendants Yang, Li, Deng, and Zhou, which were sufficient for conviction. The defense lawyer for defendant Li had no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution and presented the following defense opinions: 1. Li played an auxiliary role in this case and should be given a lighter or reduced penalty according to the law; 2. Li had minimal malicious intent, was a first-time and occasional offender, had no prior criminal record, and confessed in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In accordance with the national Mineral Resources Law and the unified requirements of the county's party committee and government, in March 2015, the people's government of a certain township in the county issued a special document to establish a leading group and a mining protection team. The purpose was to manage and protect the turquoise mines within the township, arranging personnel to patrol in shifts and stop illegal turquoise mining activities. From 9 AM on June 14 to 9 AM on June 15, 2015, at the arrangement of the township's government, the defendants Yu, Liang, among others, were on duty for mine protection at the Zu Family Courtyard in a village of the township. From 9 AM to noon on June 14, defendants Yu and Liang arrived at the mine area for duty. Around noon, they went to Xu's home in the village for lunch. After lunch, Xu suggested that defendants Yu, Liang, and Xu himself start playing mahjong for stakes, which continued from about 2 PM until around 3 AM on June 15. Afterwards, defendant Liang slept at Xu’s home, while defendant Yu went to sleep at an on-duty point in a certain gully. During this period, resident Zhu from a village in a certain town of the county gathered 15 people and secretly went to a mountain mining area in the township's village that night. Finding no one on duty at the mining protection point, they entered the mine and illegally extracted raw turquoise ore, which they later sold to Zhou for 650,000 yuan. This illegal mining incident led to a series of theft activities locally, causing, from June 15 to 17, a large number of uninformed villagers and idle people to gather at the mountain mining site in the village, forcibly conducting illegal mining. To protect the turquoise mine and control the situation, the township government of the county deployed several cadres, and the county public security bureau sent multiple police officers to protect the mine along with mining protection cadres and the public. During the protection process, a large number of illegal miners clashed with the police and mining protection personnel, resulting in three police officers being injured and several protection personnel being locked indoors for a long time, causing a severe social impact.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charged: On December 4, 2013, the police arrested a drug user, Li Moumou (already punished), who expressed willingness to assist the police in capturing "Biao Ge," who had supplied him with drugs. Li Moumou made a phone call (number 0755848××××2) to "Biao Ge" (phone number 136××××9369), pretending to purchase 100 yuan worth of heroin. They agreed to trade drugs near a vegetable field on XX Road in the Longdong Community, Longgang Street, District. At approximately 19:00 that evening, after successfully completing the transaction with defendant Qian at the agreed location, the ambushing police arrested defendant Qian, confiscating 100 yuan in drug money and a mobile phone from him. A small packet of heroin obtained from the transaction was extracted from Li Moumou (after appraisal, it weighed 0.06 grams and contained heroin ingredients). Defendant Qian confessed to the crime of drug trafficking, stating that he purchased the drugs from a man nicknamed "Pangzi" and his wife and resold them, and volunteered to assist in capturing "Pangzi" and his wife. Subsequently, Qian called "Pangzi" (number 183XXXX****), pretending to buy 640 yuan worth of heroin, and they agreed to trade drugs at XX No. XX Road, Longgang Street, District. At approximately 21:00 that evening, defendant Qian purchased heroin worth 640 yuan from "Pangzi"'s wife, defendant Xiang, at the agreed location. After the transaction was completed, defendant Xiang was arrested by the police. Two small packets of heroin purchased from defendant Xiang were extracted from defendant Qian (after appraisal, the total weight was 2.55 grams, and heroin ingredients were detected), and 640 yuan in drug money was confiscated from defendant Xiang.


According to the charges by the public prosecution agency, on the afternoon of June 27, 2014, defendants Shu and Ceng took a ride in a car driven by Ning Jia (handled in a separate case) to a bus stop next to the China Construction Bank in the southern business district of a certain city. The two then separately carried out thefts. Defendant Shu stole a white Apple 4S phone (valued at 1,226 RMB) from the right pocket of victim Li's pants at the bus stop. Defendant Ceng stole a white Apple 5 phone (valued at 2,804 RMB) carried by victim He at the same bus stop. Subsequently, as defendants Shu and Ceng attempted to flee the scene, they were apprehended by members of the community security team from Zhonggongmiao Street in the district of the city and handed over to the public security authorities. The aforementioned stolen goods have all been recovered and returned to their owners. The facts above were admitted by defendants Shu and Ceng during the court hearing, corroborated by the statements of victims Li and He, the testimonies of witnesses Ning Jia, Ning Yi, Ning Bing, Zheng, and Bao, identification records of Shu and Ceng, photos of the phones, seizure documents, return receipts, Price Appraisal Conclusion No. 10339 (2014) issued by Yin Price, the account of their capture, explanatory notes, investigative reports, and identity information of the two defendants.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused the defendants Yang and Chen of multiple instances, during the period from October to November 2014, of taking advantage of the times when the victim Xiao was out. They used a key to open the iron gate of Xiao's rented room on the second floor at No. 19, Third Street, Chengnan Station, Maonan District, Maoming City, to enter Xiao's home and commit theft. They stole one pressure cooker, an oval Guanyin jade pendant, one transformer, and 710 yuan in cash. On November 8, 2014, at around 16:00, Yang again attempted to steal from Xiao's rented room in the same manner and was discovered by Xiao's family members. Later that day, at approximately 22:00, Xiao reported to the police, and the police subsequently arrested Yang and Chen at the scene.


Prosecution's allegations: 1. On May 11, 2015, at around 10:00 am, the defendants Liu and Dong drove to the vicinity of the Liangtang Township Health Clinic. After parking the car, Liu entered the clinic premises to commit theft, while Dong waited outside. A few minutes later, Liu stole a Eureka-brand electric tricycle, which was parked in the clinic’s bike shed by Zhao, and Dong drove them away. An appraisal assessed the stolen electric tricycle's value at 4320 yuan. 2. On August 1, 2015, at around 10:20 am, the defendants Liu and Dong drove a silver-gray car with license plate number Lu A××××× to the front of Hongfuxing Beauty and Body Care Center in Donggucheng Town, Guan County. Dong first pried open the Jinpeng-brand electric tricycle parked by the victim Wang in front of the center, and Liu then rode it away, after which Dong drove them off in the car. An appraisal assessed the stolen electric tricycle's value at 2660 yuan. It was also found that during the trial, Liu's family compensated victim Zhao for the economic loss of 4320 yuan and compensated victim Wang for the economic loss of 2660 yuan, thus obtaining reconciliation. The above facts are undisputed by the defendants Liu and Dong during the court trial and are evidenced by witness testimonies, on-site inspection records, appraisal conclusions, arrest details, audiovisual materials, receipts, and the defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that defendants Liang and Ou are a married couple. On May 7, 2014, at around 11 p.m., the two of them went to Baima Street in front of the Department Store on Xinjian Road, Jinchengjiang District, to search for a target. Liang noticed that the victim Hu's green-bordered black electric scooter of the Lvneng brand did not have its alarm activated, nor was the main lock or steering lock engaged. Liang then informed Ou of this. After discussing, Liang pointed out the parking location to Ou and gave Ou two keys for committing the crime. Ou proceeded to steal the vehicle and then sell it. The next day, the two were arrested at their home by the police. According to the valuation by the Hechi City Price Certification Center, the stolen vehicle's appraised value is 3,097 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liang and Ou during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, the arrest process account, victim Hu's statement, the crime scene identification records and photos, the receipt for the purchase of the electric scooter, the price evaluation report and conclusion notice from the Hechi City Price Certification Center, surveillance video discs and screenshots, the guilty confessions of defendants Liang and Ou, and their household registration records, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on August 3, 2015, at around 1 a.m., the defendants Chen, Zhang, and another Zhang, after premeditation, pretended to ride in the taxi driven by the victim He. While the car was driving to a lane near Front Jiazai, Ergezhai, 8 kilometers from the city, the three used knives to rob the victim. They robbed cash amounting to 268 RMB and a BBK V11 mobile phone. An appraisal determined that the value of the robbed mobile phone was 480 RMB. To prove the aforementioned criminal facts, the prosecution provided evidence including the victim's statement, the defendants' confession and defense, the crime scene identification records, the list of seized and returned items, photos of the stolen goods and tools used in the crime, the valuation appraisal conclusion of the involved items by Guiyang City Price Certification Center under Document No. (2015) 280, the defendants' household registration certificates, the arrest process, etc., to verify the constitution of the crime charged against the defendants and requested this court to punish them according to the law. Defendant Chen did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Defendant Zhang did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Another defendant Zhang did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. The defense argued for leniency for defendant Zhang on the grounds that Zhang was a minor at the time of the crime, was a first-time and occasional offender, played a minor role in the joint crime and was an accomplice, and honestly confessed the crimes committed and pleaded guilty in court. After trial, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on August 3, 2015, the defendants Chen, Zhang, and Zhang, after premeditation, pretended to take a ride in the victim He’s