After the trial, it was found: On the afternoon of September 28, 2014, Wu died during an electrofishing incident. Wu's family members, including Zhou Yi, Zhou Jia, and others, believed that the Dong'an Police Station of Wujin District Public Security Bureau in Changzhou handled the matter unfairly. At around 8 a.m. on September 29, 2014, the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, Lu, along with Zhou Yi, Zhou Bing (handled separately), and 10 others went to the Dong'an Police Station in a certain town in Wujin District, Changzhou, to demand an explanation. During the reception by police instructor Zhou Ji, the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, Lu, and others snatched the video camera that officer Zhu was using to film. They assaulted victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, and Wan by choking them, punching, and kicking, thereby obstructing the police officers from performing their duties. It was also found that the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, and Lu had obtained forgiveness from the victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, Wan, and Zhou Ji. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, and Lu during the trial. These facts were supported by the statements of the victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, and Wan; photos of injuries and medical records; testimonies from witnesses Zhou Yi, Zhou Ding, and Zhou Bing; and evidence provided by the public security organs, including the incident report, the arrest process, statements of circumstances, identification records and photos, video surveillance materials and screenshots, on-site photos, and the administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient to be recognized.


After trial, it was found that: On the evening of September 22, 2013, the defendants Xie and Li, together with Zhou and Xie A (all handled in separate cases), decided to commit theft after discussion. They went to the entrance of No. 011 Liming Road in a certain district of this city, and by using wire connection techniques, stole a Qingqi Suzuki two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Wang, valued at 800 yuan. Afterwards, the four of them went to the stairway entrance of a unit in the former teacher accommodation in a district of this city and using the same technique, stole a Haojue two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Fan, valued at 700 yuan. Subsequently, the four of them went to the entrance of a chicken coop in a village in a town in this city and using the same technique, stole a Wuyang Honda two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Xu, valued at 1000 yuan. After the incident, the public security organs have recovered these vehicles and returned them to the victims. In summary, the defendants Xie and Li committed theft in collaboration three times, with a total value of 2500 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie and Li during the trial, and are supported by evidence including household registration certificates, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, explanations, testimony of the witness Wu, arrest details, statements by the victims Wang, Fan, and Xu, a price appraisal conclusion, and identification transcripts and photos, which are sufficient to confirm.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that at around 2 a.m. on June 9, 2014, the defendant Fan, together with the defendant Han and Wang (handled in a separate case), Xia, and others, were having a late-night snack at a stall at the intersection of Jiefang Street and the department store in a certain city. During the meal, the defendant Fan kicked a beer bottle towards the feet of Qiu and He, residents of a certain city, who were having a late-night snack at a nearby table. He questioned Fan about this, which made Fan dissatisfied. When Qiu, He, and others were about to leave after their late-night snack, the defendant Fan, in collaboration with the defendant Han and Wang, used a knife to injure Qiu. According to a forensic medical assessment, Qiu's injuries are classified as minor injuries. In response to the above allegations of criminal facts, the public prosecution agency read out or presented relevant evidence in court, including the victim's statement, witness testimonies, the forensic medical assessment of the degree of physical injury, physical evidence, the process of the incident, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fan and Han.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county has charged that Zhou (already sentenced), in collaboration with defendants Zhan and Hu, among others, started operating gambling dens from mid-May 2013 at the home of Li in a certain village of a certain town, at various locations in the town, and at the border between a community and another place. Hu was responsible for transporting gamblers in the casino, while Zhan assisted with various tasks. The defendants Zhan and Hu raised no objections during the trial proceedings, and the facts have been confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhou and Kang, as well as evidence from the Public Security Bureau of the county, which provided information on the local population, site diagrams, identification records, and other evidence sufficient for conviction.


The Jinwan District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that starting from April 2015, the defendants He and Zhang, a married couple, received lottery bets from a certain place in the convenience store they operated on the first floor of the comprehensive building in Tielu Village, a certain town in a certain city. They reported the betting situation for each period to their "superiors" Li Moujiang and Weng Mou (both handled in separate cases), and took a commission of about 10% of the total bet amount. The two defendants received bets from about twenty to thirty people per period, with the amount of bets per period ranging from approximately 700 to 1,800 yuan. They accepted bets for more than twenty periods, and by the time the case was uncovered, they had made a total profit of over 5,000 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Starting from January 2016, defendant Zheng, knowing that defendant Guo did not have the qualification certificate for heavy machinery operation, still violated safety management regulations by assigning Guo to operate a crane at Jianhua Pipe Pile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jianhua Company) located at No. 2, Sha Tsai Road, Sha Tsai Village, Minzhong Town, Zhongshan City. On the night of February 23 of the same year, Zheng instructed Guo to operate a crane at Jianhua Company's D3 site. While Guo A was lifting a pipe pile with the crane, due to not mastering operational techniques and improper operation, he began lifting the pipe pile before the victim, Liu, had moved to a safe area. As a result, the pipe pile fell, crushing Liu from Zhongshan Jianxing Logistics Co., Ltd. (Jianxing Company) to death (according to forensic identification, Liu's cause of death was traumatic shock caused by massive blunt force trauma to the head and torso). After the incident, Guo and Zheng remained at the scene awaiting the police. After being apprehended, they truthfully confessed to the above facts. Furthermore, it was ascertained that after the incident, Jianxing Company reached an agreement with the victim's family and compensated them with 950,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Guo and Zheng during the trial, and were corroborated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the confess


After trial, it was found: In November 2010, defendant Mou transferred his Hyundai car located in a certain region, originally insured with the Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company Ltd., a branch in a certain state (hereinafter referred to as Ping An P&C), to defendant Hu's name. The car's license plate was changed but the vehicle was still possessed and used by Mou. On January 2011, due to poor condition, high maintenance costs, and difficulty in selling the car, Mou intended to fabricate a unilateral car accident to fraudulently claim the insurance money. Mou initially took the car to Zhu's Xin Feng Auto Repair Shop, located at 4 Tongsheng Road in a certain city district, and instructed Shu, a mechanic at the shop, to replace the car's original airbags with old ones. On the night of January 8, 2011, in collusion with Zhu, Weng, and Shu, they drove the car and parked it near a mountain forest contracted by Zhu, preparing to stage the accident. The next night, Mou, Zhu, Hu, Xi


The People's Procuratorate of Gusu District in a certain city accused defendants Xu and Li that from February to April 2015, they repeatedly evaded expressway toll fees totaling RMB 10,900.83 by using steel plates to lighten the weight during the weighing process at several toll stations in certain areas of the city's ring expressway.


Upon trial, it was found that at about 21:00 on March 2, 2014, defendants Yang and Sun, after drinking, went to the Hualian Hotel on Wenxi Road, Chunxi Town, Gaochun District, Nanjing City, intending to stay overnight. When trying to check in, they unjustifiably refused to show their identification cards and were therefore denied service by the attendant. As a result, defendants Yang and Sun verbally abused the attendant. When hotel security guard Yin intervened, Yang and Sun beat him, causing Yin multiple injuries to his face and waist. Forensic examination determined that victim Yin’s bilateral transverse process fractures of the lumbar vertebrae 1-2 constituted minor injury of the first degree, and the facial injuries were classified as slight injury. On March 2, 2014, defendants Yang and Sun were apprehended. During the trial, mediated by this court, an agreement was reached: defendants Yang and Sun jointly compensated victim Yin a total of 25,000 RMB for medical expenses, lost income, nursing fees, and other economic losses, which was fulfilled in court. Victim Yin expressed forgiveness and requested leniency for the defendants. The facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court by the public prosecution authority, which this court acknowledges: 1. The statement of the victim Yin regarding being assaulted and injured by the two defendants, along with the identification records and photos of the defendants. 2. Testimony of witness Qing, confirming the two intoxicated men arrived at the hotel for check-in, were refused after failing to provide IDs, and then assaulted hotel security guard Yin, with one individual identified as Yang after showing ID. 3. Surveillance video footage and accompanying explanation. 4. Victim Yin’s medical records and medical invoices. 5. Forensic medical examination report on bodily injury extent from the Gaochun branch of Nanjing Public Security Bureau, detailing the apprehension process. 6. Compensation agreement, receipt, and statement of forgiveness. 7. Identification documents and statements of the two defendants. Defendants Yang and Sun raised no objection to these facts and evidence, offered no defense, and expressed willingness to plead guilty.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged and this court has determined through trial that, at approximately 10 p.m. on January 26, 2015, the defendant Shi got into a scuffle with the victim Wang over a trivial matter at the intersection of Bailu North Road and Xiaolin Road in Yushan Town, a certain city. Subsequently, the defendant Zhou arrived at the scene and joined defendant Shi in assaulting the victim Wang, resulting in fractures to Wang's 10th, 11th, and 12th ribs on the left side. According to a forensic medical examination, the injury to Wang's chest constituted a grade two minor injury. After being brought to justice, defendant Shi truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Defendant Zhou voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed to the criminal facts after being brought to justice. After the incident, defendant Shi compensated the victim Wang with 5,000 yuan, and the victim Wang expressed understanding towards the actions of both defendants Shi and Zhou. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shi and Zhou during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, testimony from witnesses Pan, Dou Jia, and Dou Yi, identification records, medical records, the forensic medical assessment of the degree of harm, details of arrest and surrender, identity documentation, receipts, a letter of understanding, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts, which this court hereby confirms.


The prosecution charges that, from the evening of October 26 to the early morning of October 27, 2015, defendants Ou and Wang, along with Lin, Feng, and Zhang (all three were dealt with in a separate case, Zhang was born on March 26, 2002), conspired to commit theft while they were playing at defendant Ou's home. Around 2 p.m. on December 27, defendants Ou, Wang, Lin, and Zhang walked to the vicinity of victim Xia's residence at *** number, while Feng arrived on a motorcycle. Subsequently, defendants Ou and Lin acted as lookouts; Zhang entered the house through a window to steal, later handing over a stolen Amoi A072 tablet (valued at 770 RMB as appraised), a Coolpad 8076 mobile phone (valued at 180 RMB as appraised), a bracelet (valued at 20 RMB as appraised), two mobile phone chargers (brands unknown), 10 Hong Kong dollars, and 100 Vietnamese dong to defendants Wang and Feng, who were waiting outside to assist. After succeeding in their theft, the five individuals fled the scene and later went to Xin Haofa Trading Company on Tongxin Middle Road in Baijiao Town, where they sold the Amoi tablet to Weng and exchanged the 10 Hong Kong dollars for RMB. On October 28, 2015, the police arrested defendants Ou and Lin, recovering the Coolpad mobile phone involved in the case from defendant Ou, the bracelet involved in the case from Lin, and the Amoi tablet and 10 Hong Kong dollars from Weng. All of the aforementioned items were returned to the victim Xia. On October 28, 2015, defendant Wang turned himself into the police; on November 26, 2015, Feng turned himself into the police. These facts, to which defendants Ou and Wang raised no objections during the trial, are substantiated by the victim Xia's statement, the identification records of defendants Ou and Wang, the confessions and identification records of co-defendants Zhang, Lin, and Feng, the testimony and identification record of witness Weng, the search records, seizure warrant, seizure records, seizure list, return list, identification photos, onsite photos, arrest process, household registration documents, case handling notes, test report, appraisal report on the value of the involved property, on-site test report, telephone call records, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges that on the afternoon of February 8, 2017, in a certain village of a certain county, victim Wang B and others, after attending a communal meal in the village, were playing cards at a kiosk in the village with their family members Chen B, Chen A, Zhong, and defendant Wang and Wang A (already sentenced) and others. Due to differing play styles, they started arguing. Because defendant Wang was not a local of a certain town, he called Lin B from a certain village in the town (handled in another case), asking Lin B to come to the village to mediate. Lin B, who was having tea in a certain place in the town, after receiving the call, prepared to drive to the village. Defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A (handled in another case) who were having tea with Lin B also got in the car. About 10 minutes later, Lin B drove to the entrance of the village and parked. Defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A first got off the car and walked towards the village, walking approximately 50 meters to meet defendants Wang and Wang A at a kiosk in the slope. Defendant Mo saw a knife in the kiosk and picked it up. Then, defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A followed defendants Wang and Wang A into the village. After walking about 100 meters, they encountered victims Wang B, Chen B, and others at the trash bins in the village, and a dispute arose again. Defendant Su first hit Chen B, who then ran away after being punched. Defendants Wang and Wang A chased after him. Meanwhile, defendant Mo slashed victim Wang B's arm


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: Around July 2013, defendants Cheng, Lin, and others engaged in illegal pyramid selling activities in the vicinity of a certain town, with one den set up on the fifth floor of a rented house in the special zone for overseas Chinese in a certain town. Defendant Cheng acted as the "director" of this pyramid selling den, responsible for managing the daily affairs of the den. Defendant Lin served as the "director" of other dens and often helped at this den. At the end of July of the same year, the victim Gao was lured to this pyramid selling den by an online friend. On September 4 of the same year, victim Xin was lured to the den by defendant Lin. On September 8 of the same year, victim Wang A was lured to the den by accomplice "Wang B" (dealt with in a separate case). On October 3 of the same year, victim Chen A was lured to the den by accomplice "Chen B" (dealt with in a separate case). In the den, defendant Cheng participated and inst


The prosecution charged that around 2 p.m. on December 31, 2017, defendants Lu, Tang, and Yao forcibly took the victim, Yuan, from the Jiangping Internet Cafe in Taixing City to the Huaxia Venture Capital Company on Yongfeng Road in Taixing City to demand repayment of high-interest loans. They used slapping and guarding as methods to force the debt repayment, restricting the victim's personal freedom for approximately 9 hours until around 11 p.m. that day. During this period, defendant Lu pulled Yuan's hair and slapped Yuan once, while defendant Yao slapped Yuan several times. After being apprehended, defendants Lu, Tang, and Yao all truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, defendant Lu voluntarily compensated the victim and received the victim's forgiveness.


The prosecution agency charges that around 1 a.m. on February 23, 2021, the defendants Wan and Zheng, while riding past Moutai Red Army Elementary School, noticed a black Chunfeng brand two-wheeled motorcycle parked by the roadside. The two found the motorcycle attractive and jointly stole it, riding it to a certain town in a certain county of a certain province to Mou's residence, intending to use it for themselves. After the incident, the public security authorities apprehended Wan and Zheng, seized the stolen motorcycle in accordance with the law, and returned it to the victim Xiang. The families of Wan and Zheng apologized and compensated the victim, obtaining the victim's forgiveness. According to the Price Certification Center of the Renhuai City Development and Reform Bureau, the market retail price of the stolen Chunfeng brand ordinary two-wheeled motorcycle was 16,928 yuan as of February 23, 2021. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence including the case acceptance register, decision to open a case, circumstances of arrest, household registration information, mandatory examination documents, on-site inspection report, records of seizure, seizure decision, inventory of returned items, purchase invoice, motor vehicle registration certificate, motorcycle registration certificate, proof documents, witness testimonies, statements from the victim, confessions and defenses from the defendants Zheng and Wan, the price determination conclusion, and records of examination, identification, and audiovisual materials.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in September 2015, Wang and Du (both minors, handled in separate cases) had a quarrel on QQ over trivial matters. They decided to gather people to fight at Friendship Square in the High-Tech Zone of the city. On October 30, 2015, around 2:30 pm, Du, leading Wu and others, and Wang, leading Geng and others, engaged in a fight using baseball bats, batons, and other weapons at Friendship Square in the High-Tech Zone of the city.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province charged that: After conspiring together, defendants Bao and Zhang, on December 23, 2013, at around 10 am, took advantage of Bao's opportunity to stay in Room 8215 of the Free City Intercity Hotel on Freedom Road in a district of this city with Chen and Li. While the latter two were asleep, Bao stole Chen's wallet (which contained a bank card and an ID card), left the room door ajar, and departed to meet defendant Zhang who was waiting outside. Together, they went to the Wuchang Jiefang Road Branch of China Construction Bank, used the card to withdraw 8000 yuan from an ATM. Subsequently, defendants Bao and Zhang returned to the aforementioned hotel, and Zhang entered Room 8215 by sneaking in through the door, stole an Apple brand mobile phone belonging to Chen (valued at 2500 yuan), and the two then divided the stolen money and goods. Defendants Bao and Zhang turned themselves into the public security authorities on December 26 and 27, 2013, respectively. The stolen phone and 5300 yuan of the stolen money were recovered and returned in full to the victim Chen, along with 2700 yuan compensated by a relative on behalf of defendant Bao. Regarding the above facts, defendants Bao and Zhang expressed no objections during the trial, and they were confirmed by evidence provided by the prosecution, including the investigation report issued by the public security authorities, the process of apprehension, the scene identification and photos of the stolen goods, the seizure and return list of stolen money and goods, the valuation appraisal, the report and statement from victim Chen, the bank card transaction inquiry list, and the confessions of defendants Bao and Zhang. The evidence, which was consistent and corroborative, was presented, cross-examined, and confirmed in court, sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was ascertained that defendants Li and Zhang, on June 20, 2015, at approximately 17:00, at the intersection of Changqing Road and Yindun Road in this city, had a dispute with a taxi driver, Chen, over taking a taxi. Subsequently, they used an iron rod and their fists and feet to assault the victim, Chen, and were apprehended at the scene by public security officers. The forensic identification report determined that the cumulative length of the lacerations on the victim Chen's head and face was 4.4 centimeters, the area of contusion on the right waist was 45 square centimeters, the cumulative area of the contusions on both lower limbs was 52 square centimeters, and the lumbar spine X-ray report indicated a mild posterior displacement of the L5 vertebra. The MRI scan showed mild posterior displacement of the L5 vertebra and protrusion of the L2/3, L3/4, L4/5 discs, and a posterior protrusion of L5/S1. The degree of injury was classified as minor injury of the second degree. It was also found that during the trial of the case, the victim Chen filed an incidental civil lawsuit. Through mediation presided over by this court, defendants Li and Zhang compensated the victim Chen for all economic losses, amounting to 60,000 RMB. The victim Chen expressed forgiveness towards defendants Li and Zhang and applied to withdraw the incidental civil lawsuit. This court orally ruled to allow the victim to withdraw the lawsuit. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by physical evidence photos, basic information on the household population, the process of arrest and case resolution by the public security agency, the incidental civil complaint, receipt, mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, statement of withdrawal, testimonial evidence from witnesses Dai and Lu, the statement and identification record by the victim Chen, and the forensic identification report, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that at the end of 2007, the defendants Jie and Lian, as employees of a state agency, abused their power by illegally processing two village house ownership certificates for Xin (handled in a separate case), even though Xin's submitted materials did not meet the requirements for obtaining village house ownership certificates. This resulted in the demolition and land acquisition headquarters in the Chengbei area of a certain district in a certain city compensating 12 households who purchased houses built by Xin, treating them as small property houses during the demolition and land acquisition process in the Chengbei area in 2008, causing a national loss of 2,153,842 RMB. To support these allegations, the prosecution provides the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: residence certificate, appointment documents, files from the municipal government office (Ji Zheng Ban Fa [1999] No. 73), Shandong Provincial Government (Lu Mou Mou Zi [1998] No. 262), (Lu Mou Mou Zi [2006] No. 58), and "Opinions on Compensation and Settlement for Small Property Houses from the Chengbei Area Demolition and Construction Headquarters"; 2. Witness testimonies; 3. Statements and defenses from the defendants Jie, Lian, and others.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner charges: On March 13, 2020, at around 17:30, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went to the horse farm operated by a certain Feng in a village of Taigemudian Town, a certain Banner. Together, they stole from the steel structure house of the farm: one shaver, one square table, one Star brand small refrigerator, and one waterproof two-core electric wire. On March 14, 2020, around 11:00, defendant Tian went to the horse farm operated by Feng in the same village and stole from the steel structure house of the farm: one square table, one stove, one waterproof three-core electric wire, 15 liters of diesel, and one Triangle brand electric kettle. On March 16, 2020, at around 17:30, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went again to the farm and together stole from its steel structure house: one water pump and one waterproof two-core wire. On March 28, 2020, around 11:00, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went to the same farm again and, while stealing metal shelves and iron pipes from the steel structure house, were discovered by Yun, who called the police. Later, they were caught on the spot by officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain Banner. The defendants, Tian and Wang, did not object to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations and signed the confirmation. They also raised no objections during the court trial process. According to the appraisal conclusion provided by the Price Certification Center of a certain Banner, document number Tuzuojiayanzi [2020] No. 10, the total value of the stolen property is RMB 1,749.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place in a certain banner charges that in April 2017, defendants Li and Liu acquired peanuts from rural areas and, after selection and packaging, sold them as peanut seeds at a price of 6.6 yuan per jin to villagers from Haridaobugacha and Haolibao Gacha in a certain town in a certain banner. A total of 22,000 jin of these unmarked peanut seeds were sold, involving an amount of 145,200.00 yuan. After planting, the villagers who purchased the peanut seeds from Li and Liu experienced situations where the germination rate was low or the seeds rotted in the ground, resulting in losses to over 3,000 mu of farmland. After the case was discovered, defendants Li and Liu compensated the victims a total of 164,090.00 yuan, and received the victims' understanding. Upon coming to trial, defendants Li and Liu truthfully confessed their crimes. After being informed of the system of leniency for pleading guilty, they voluntarily signed the "Confession and Leniency Plea Statement" in the presence of duty lawyer Su. To prove the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including: the registration form for case acceptance, the decision to file a case, household registration information, case transfer letter, compensation agreement, receipt, statements from victims Qi and others, confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Liu, identification records, and inspection and examination records.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that from March to September 2014, the defendants Luo and Chen set up a casino at the stone slab in the small park opposite the Third Elementary School on Xiuxian Road, Xinhua Street, in the district. Defendant Chen was responsible for dealing cards and collecting rake money, which was then handed over to defendant Luo. On September 26, 2014, the public security authorities uncovered this casino and arrested defendant Chen, seizing one deck of playing cards. On October 26, 2014, the public security authorities arrested defendant Luo on the Baohua Road section of Xinhua Street.


After examination, it was found that starting from January 12, 2016, the defendants Peng, Fu, and Bai, together with Liao A, Yao, Wen (all at large), and others, set up a casino in room 2805, unit 1, North Tower, Jinling Family, XX District, XX City, using the "Fight Bull" method to organize gambling activities. Defendant Peng invested 4,000 RMB and participated in the profit sharing, obtaining illicit money amounting to approximately 10,000 RMB. Defendants Fu and Bai organized customers for the casino and participated in the profit sharing, obtaining illicit money amounting to approximately 4,000 RMB and 2,000 RMB respectively. Later, the casino employed Xiao and Guo (both have been administratively punished) as attendants responsible for skimming and lookout. At around 2 a.m. on January 22, 2016, the public security authorities raided the casino, capturing defendants Peng, Fu, Bai, and individuals such as Wu and Shu, who were engaging in gambling activities (all have been administratively punished) and confiscated illegal proceeds of 10,300 RMB from that day at the scene. Defendant Peng had no objections during the court trial concerning the above facts, which were also substantiated by evidence such as the arrest report and situation notes provided by the local police station under the Yuhua Branch of the Public Security Bureau of XX City, inspection records, lists of seized and recovered items, lists of evidence preservation, identification records and photographs, on-site photographs, house rental contracts, Public Security Administrative Punishment Decision Documents Nos. [2016] 0221, 0222, 0223, 0224, 0225, 0226, 0227, 0228, 0229 from the Yuhua Branch of the Public Security Bureau of XX City, witness testimonies from Guo, Xiao, Xie, Hu A, Hu B, Shu, Liao, Deng A, Liang A, Wu, Deng B, He, Wang, Liang B, and Li, confessions from defendants Peng, Fu, and Bai and evidence regarding their identities and behaviors, sufficient to support the findings.


The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on March 20, 2016, the defendant Chen, in the backyard of the old tax bureau behind Fenghuo on Baishazhou Avenue, Hongshan District, a certain city, used tools he carried with him to pry open the security window, stealing 500 RMB in cash and two bottles of liquor from the victim, Wang. Subsequently, defendant Chen invited defendant Liao to drive to the crime scene again, where they stole a carton of Huanghelou 1916 cigarettes, several packs of Huanghelou Mantianyou cigarettes, over thirty bottles of liquor, and various daily necessities from the victim, Wang. After appraisal, the total value of the items involved was 4266.9 RMB. On March 23, 2016, defendants Chen and Liao were apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendants Chen and Liao have compensated the victim, Wang, in the amount of 15,000 RMB and obtained his forgiveness.


The prosecution charges that in early October 2014, the defendants Xiang and Gu, after discussion, conspired to organize gambling in the form of playing "Little Nine" at the tea room operated by Xiang located in the market of Qianjin Village, a certain town in Haining City. They were joined by Gao, Qian, Zhang, and others, from which they made a profit of over 10,500 yuan. Among the defendants, Xiang was responsible for taking commissions, while Gu managed the casino. Afterward, aside from distributing so-called reward money and covering expenses for the participants, each of the defendants Xiang and Gu received 2,350 yuan. During the trial of this case, Gu returned the illegal income of 2,350 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Xiang and Gu during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by evidence including witness testimonies from gambling participants such as Gao, the arrest process, household registration proof, the criminal judgment and execution notice, and receipt records, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon investigation, it was found that the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma participated in the "Tianjin Tiens Pyramid Scheme Organization." Wu held the position of "Director," Wang was the "Housekeeper," and Ma was the "Big Brother." From May 25 to May 30, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma lured the victim, Zu, into this pyramid scheme organization, restricted his personal freedom at Room 611, No. 12, Nancang East Village, Yicheng Street, Yixing City, and used physical assault and other means to force Zu to join the pyramid scheme. On May 30, 2015, due to a report from another person, the victim Zu was rescued. On May 30, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma were arrested by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the above facts after being brought to justice. The defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma did not object to the above facts during the trial, and these were corroborated by the victim Zu's statement record, the testimony record of witness Guo, the confessions of co-offenders Xue, Li, and Jin, among others, the on-site inspection record and related identification records produced by the Yixing City Public Security Bureau, as well as the explanatory materials on the investigation of the criminal case, police registration forms, relevant statements, and household registration documents provided by the public security investigative personnel, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges: At around 7:40 a.m. on June 25, 2014, defendants Song and Liu, while on a No. 245 bus in this city, stole a black wallet from the shoulder bag carried by the victim, Nie, through Liu, with Song assisting. The wallet contained 300 yuan and an ID card. Due to their suspicious behavior, Song and Liu were apprehended by police officers, and the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victim.


The court trial found that around 18:00 on October 9, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Shi rented a Honda Accord car (license plate Liao PXXX**) from a car rental company under the pretense of using it for rental purposes. On October 10, 2014, Zhou and Shi used the car as collateral to borrow 12,000 yuan from the owner of a small loan company, Zhou. The Huludao City Involved Items Price Evaluation Center appraised the car's value at 48,000 yuan. It was also found that the defendants Zhou and Shi had compensated the victim for all economic losses and obtained the forgiveness of Wang, the owner of the car rental company. Defendants Zhou and Shi admitted to the aforementioned criminal facts during the trial. The statements of the victim, witnesses' testimonies, car rental contract, letter of forgiveness, IOU, personal loan contract, defendants' household registration materials and actual behavior, source of the case, and details of the arrest all serve as evidence. After cross-examination during the trial, the evidence was sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: 1. Between July and August 2012, defendants Jin, Zhu, and Tao, in collusion with others, twice established a casino in Room 101, Unit 1, Building 16, Jixiang Community, Danghu Street, in a house rented by defendant Tao in a certain city. They organized gambling in the form of "inserting Luo" with people such as Zheng (handled separately), illegally profiting more than 4,200 yuan. 2. On a day between July and August of the same year, defendants Jin, Zhu, Dai, and Tao, in collusion with others, established a casino at the same location in Tao's rental property. They organized gambling in the form of "inserting Luo" with people such as Zheng, illegally profiting more than 2,000 yuan. 3. Between July and August of the same year, defendants Jin, Zhu, Dai, and Song, in collusion with others, established a casino five times at Song's home in Room 502, Unit 2, Building 20, a village in Danghu Street of a certain city. They organized gambling in the form of "inserting Luo" with people such as Zheng, illegally profiting more than 16,900 yuan. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by the five defendants during the court trial. Furthermore, there is evidence such as witness testimonies, criminal judgments for prior offenses, public security administrative penalty decisions, explanatory statements, the course of the crime, the process of apprehension, and identification documents, which are sufficient to establish these facts.


Through the trial, it was ascertained that the defendants Hu and Ran were classmates. On July 27, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, defendants Hu, Ran, and others including Li and Chen went to the eastern apartment on the 7th floor of Building 2, Unit 1, in the western district of a certain city. They pretended to be police officers, knocked on the victim Zhang's door to open it, and under the pretense of investigating drug use, demanded fines, thereby defrauding Zhang of 20,000 yuan in cash. Additionally, under the guise of a hush fee, they defrauded Zhang of another 2,000 yuan in cash, totaling 22,000 yuan. On September 4, 2014, defendant Hu, pretending to be a police officer, tricked Liu, the father of the victim Liu Feng, into believing he was facilitating an early release from compulsory drug rehabilitation. At the south gate of a square in a certain city's district, he defrauded Liu of 20,000 yuan in cash. On September 21, 2014, at around 6:30 PM, defendants Hu, Ran, and another person, Fei, went to a used car dealership opposite a thermal power plant in a district of a certain city. They pretended to be police officers and took victim Shi away, pretending to interrogate him for drug use and demanded fines, thereby defrauding Shi of 12,000 yuan in cash. On September 23, 2014, the two defendants were arrested by the police and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The money defrauded by the two defendants was squandered by them. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendant Hu and his defense lawyer, defendant Ran and his defense lawyer, and victim Zhang during the court trial. This is corroborated by victim report materials and statements, witness testimonies, identification records, lists of seized items, lists of confiscated items, drug test reports, household registration certificates, the process of arrest, explanations regarding the suspects' capture, and confessions from defendants Hu and Ran, which together provide sufficient grounds for the determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: Defendant Xiu, due to a dispute with Tang, harbored feelings of revenge against Tang and thus approached defendant Liu and Xiu Jia (already sentenced) with the intent to teach Tang a lesson. In early July 2011, under the instruction of defendant Liu, Xiu Jia led a young male twice to the home of villager Lu Jia in the development zone of a certain city to identify the location, intending to exact revenge on Tang, who frequently visited there. At noon on July 13, 2011, defendant Liu learned that Tang was going to Lu Jia's house to hang out. Liu then called Xiu Jia to instruct the already hired three young men to prepare to carry out the assault. After receiving the call from defendant Liu, Xiu Jia led the three young men by taxi to Houmou Village. At around 2 p.m. that day, the three young men, masked, broke into Lu Jia's house, and assaulted Tang with wooden sticks, causing multiple injuries to his body. Afterward, Xiu Jia, who was waiting outside, took the three young men in a taxi to flee the scene. According to forensic identification, the soft tissue contusions on Tang's left shoulder, left upper and lower limbs, and left waist were collectively assessed as minor injuries, while the injury to his right hand was classified as a minor injury. Following the incident, defendant Xiu and Liu were respectively arrested and brought to justice on April 1 and March 17, 2014.


The prosecution alleges that on October 27, 2014, at around 16:00, defendants Re and Bu, after prior discussion, went together to the entrance of the Xindaxin Mall located on Fengshan Street in this city. There, defendant Re held a child to act as a lookout and cover, while defendant Bu reached into a bag, thereby stealing a white Samsung NOTE2 mobile phone worth 1,460 RMB from the black backpack that the victim, Ye, was carrying on her right shoulder. Subsequently, defendants Re and Bu were apprehended by patrolling police officers from the Yangming Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau while attempting to flee the scene. On the 28th of the same month, they were placed under residential surveillance by the city's Public Security Bureau. However, due to repeated failure to appear after numerous summonses, they were criminally detained and placed on the wanted list. On May 29, 2015, defendants Re and Bu surrendered themselves at the Kuerle Police Station and the Shache Station of the Urumqi Railway Public Security Bureau in Xinjiang, and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. After the incident, the involved mobile phone was recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants, Re and Bu, raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by evidence, including the seizure decision, list of seized items, list of returned items, hospital examination report, population information, "apprehension record," statement of circumstances, the victim Ye's statement, a price appraisal report, and recognition records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that around 7:00 on June 28, 2015, defendants Zheng and Chen, along with Gong and Ran (both already sentenced), drove motorcycles with covered license plates to a toll exit ramp in a district of a certain city on the Guangsan Highway to pick up passengers. They encountered victims Lu Jia, Lu Yi, and Lu Bing as they got off a bus. Zheng and the others agreed to drive Lu Bing and his companions to their destination for 30 yuan. Subsequently, Zheng drove Lu Bing, Chen drove Lu Yi, Ran drove Lu Jia on a motorcycle with license plate J×××××, and Gong carried Lu Bing’s luggage on a motorcycle with license plate H×××××. The four drivers set off together. On the way, the four led the victims along a detour as they traveled separately. When they reached a spot on the road in front of No. 15, Keji West Road, Shishan Town in a district, Gong, along with Zheng, threatened Lu Bing and forcibly took 250 yuan. Gong then met Chen, and they threatened Lu Yi, forcibly taking 300


After trial, it was established that from March to September 2015, defendant Zhu, without obtaining the qualification for foreign labor export, recruited workers to go to a certain country and place through Zhuang. Zhu collected a deposit from victims Shi, Yuan, Gao, and 170 other people, each being 5,000 RMB, and from victims Yao and Ni, each being 3,000 RMB, totaling 871,000 RMB from 175 victims. Of this, defendants Zhu and Zhuang received 612,500 RMB and 258,500 RMB respectively as start-up funds for the project. Zhuang additionally paid Zhu a deposit of 200,000 RMB. None of the aforementioned victims were able to go abroad for work. On September 15, 2015, defendants Zhu and Zhuang had a dispute with the workers. During the mediation by the petition department, despite knowing that others had called the police and were waiting on the scene for the issue to be resolved, they truthfully confessed their criminal acts to the police officers who responded to the scene. After the incident, defendants Zhu and Zhuang returned a total of 871,000 RMB, which was refunded to the victims. The above facts are substantiated by the confessions of defendants Zhu and Zhuang, the statements of victims Yuan, Gao, Yao, Ni, and others, the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Ma, Kuang, and others, documentary evidence such as the labor contracts and receipts provided by the victims, the certification issued by the Jintan District Commerce Bureau of Changzhou City, and the incident report provided by the police officers of Xicheng Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of Jintan District, Changzhou City.


The prosecution charges that at approximately 1:50 a.m. on August 9, 2019, defendant Li hired defendant Bai to drive a Shaanxi-brand heavy-duty semi-trailer truck (license plate XXX) without a permit for road transport of hazardous materials. While driving from east to west along National Highway 109 and reversing from south to north at the 900-kilometer mark within a certain banner's jurisdiction, they collided with a Liberation-brand heavy-duty semi-trailer truck (license plate XXX) driven by Wei, which was traveling from east to west along the same highway. Subsequently, the Liberation-brand truck veered off the southern side of the road, overturned, and caused minor injuries to defendant Bai and the victim Wei, as well as damage to both vehicles and the road infrastructure.

According to the determination by a certain banner brigade of the Erdos Public Security Bureau Traffic Management Detachment, defendant Bai bore the primary responsibility for this accident, while the victim Wei had secondary liability. After the incident, defendants Li and Bai voluntarily confessed to their crimes. Through mediation, they agreed to mutually cover losses within the compulsory traffic insurance limits, with any shortfall handled according to their respective liabilities.

In support of the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution provided relevant evidence and asserted that defendant Li, by hiring defendant Bai to drive a vehicle lacking a permit to transport hazardous chemicals, committed acts that violated Articles X and Item 4 of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The facts of the crime are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient, warranting criminal responsibility for Crime X. Defendants Li and Bai truthfully confessed to the criminal facts upon being brought to justice, which, according to Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, qualifies as confession.

A suggestion was made to sentence defendant Li to one month and fifteen days of criminal detention and a fine; and defendant Bai to one month to one month and fifteen days of criminal detention and a fine. Li and Bai did not object to the charged facts, the crime, or the sentencing recommendations. They agreed to apply the expedited procedure and signed a written confession and plea agreement. They raised no objections during the court trial.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 8 pm on September 30, 2019, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, drove from a certain place to a certain district. After parking the car, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, walked to the Hahusuhai Fishery Company’s crab breeding area to steal crabs. They were later discovered by a security patrol team from Hahusuhai Lake and were taken by force to the Hahusuhai Police Station of the Tuzuoqi Public Security Bureau. The stolen crabs were weighed and seized on-site. According to the [2019] No. 79 price certification conclusion document from the Tuzuoqi Price Certification Center, the stolen crabs were valued at 3,038 RMB. The stolen crabs were returned to the victimized company after the incident. After arriving at the case, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, voluntarily and truthfully confessed their crimes. The defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, did not object to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and they signed and acknowledged this, raising no objections during the court trial.


After trial investigation, it was found that the defendants Huang and Mao were former employees of a music venue in Bao’an District, a certain city, known as HuanXSong KTV. In August 2013, due to a wage dispute, defendant Huang harbored dissatisfaction towards the company. Consequently, he alone or in collaboration with his colleague, defendant Mao, stole foreign liquors from the company on multiple occasions. The specifics are as follows:

On August 18, 2013, at around 17:00, defendant Huang entered the company warehouse and stole one bottle each of Xuan Ni Si XO, Ma Mou AXO, and Ren Tou Ma Mou B, which were subsequently sold. According to the appraisal, the three stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 4,088 RMB.

On August 19, 2013, defendant Huang entered the company warehouse again and stole two bottles each of Xuan Ni Si XO and Ma Mou AXO, which were subsequently sold. According to the appraisal, the four stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 5,546 RMB.

On August 27, 2013, defendants Huang and Mao plotted in advance and went to the company, with Mao responsible for engaging in conversation to distract the security guard and act as a lookout, while defendant Huang entered the company warehouse and stole a total of twelve bottles of foreign liquors including Xuan Ni Si XO, Ma Mou AXO, and Ren Tou Ma Mou B. The two then sold these stolen goods together. According to the appraisal, the twelve stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 16,056 RMB.

On February 19, 2014, defendant Huang was apprehended by the public security authorities; defendant Mao was apprehended on March 3, 2014. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Mao during the court hearing, and there is relevant evidence to substantiate these claims, making it sufficient for conviction. Additionally, it was found: After the trial, the family of defendant Mao reached a settlement agreement with the HuanXSong KTV music venue in Bao’an District, a certain city, and received their understanding.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that beginning in November 2013, defendants Qiu, Zheng, Luo, and He, after prior consultation, unlawfully set up a plating factory in a village of a town in a certain district of a certain city for electroplating processing without environmental approval procedures or pollution control equipment. They discharged the industrial wastewater generated during processing directly through ditches to the outside of the factory. On April 11, 2014, they were discovered by the Environmental Protection Bureau of a certain district in a certain city. Tests showed that the total chromium content in the factory's drainage ditch was 19.2 mg/L, which is 19.2 times the national standard for chromium emissions. After the incident, defendants Luo and He voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the above facts. To prove the charges, the prosecutor presented relevant evidence in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on October 15, 2015, at 17:29, a drug user named Deng contacted the defendant Li by phone, intending to purchase five methamphetamine pills for 200 yuan, agreeing to trade in a certain district of the city. Later, Li handed over a small package containing five suspected methamphetamine pills, sealed in a transparent plastic bag, to the defendant Mu, instructing Mu to deliver it to Deng, to which Mu agreed. At approximately 17:40 on the same day, Mu sold the five suspected methamphetamine pills (net weight 0.45 grams) to Deng for 200 yuan near the Jiantan River Bridge and returned to Li's residence to hand over the 200 yuan to Li. At 21:39 on the same day, Deng again contacted Li by phone, intending to purchase 100 yuan worth of methamphetamine, agreeing to trade at the exit of the one-way road under the Jiantan River Bridge. At around 22:00, Li drove to the agreed location and sold a small package of suspected methamphetamine, weighing 0.51 grams, to Deng for 100 yuan, before being caught on the spot by the police. The police seized the aforementioned suspected methamphetamine and methamphetamine pills from Deng, and 300 yuan in drug money, along with two mobile phones used for drug dealing, from Li. On the same day, under Li's guidance, the police arrested Mu downstairs at Mu's residence. According to the city's Public Security Bureau Drug Testing Center's identification, methamphetamine components were detected in the aforementioned methamphetamine sample, and methamphetamine and caffeine components were detected in the suspected methamphetamine pills. After being brought to the case, defendants Li and Mu truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the trial, defendants Li and Mu also had no objections to the above facts, which are sufficiently established by photos of the drugs and drug money as physical evidence; case registration form, case initiation decision, the process of arriving at the case, household registration information, call records, explanation of Mu's arrest, on-site test reports; witness testimony from Deng; confessions of defendants Li and Mu; physical evidence examination report; search record, inspection record, extraction record, recognition record, and on-site weighing record, among other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on January 23, 2014, at around 12 PM in a town in Jarud Banner, Hu had a verbal altercation with the defendant Bao over a parking issue. After the argument, Hu picked up a shovel and assaulted Bao. Later, Bao sought out the defendant Liu and others, who, wielding a shovel head, assaulted Hu, resulting in a fracture of the left orbital bone, damage to the pupil constrictor muscle, and trauma-induced deformation of the pupil. On June 3, 2014, the Tongliao City Hospital Forensic Identification Center assessed that Hu's bodily injuries were of a minor grade level 2. On November 18, 2015, the Institute of Forensic Science and Technology of the China University of Political Science and Law assessed that Hu's bodily injuries were of a minor injury degree.


Upon examination, it was found: In October 2015, the defendants Deng and Shao, a married couple, rented the ground floor of a building at No. 17 Anping Road, a town in a certain county, to operate the "Xiaomi Foot Massage" shop. During the course of business, defendant Deng, in collaboration with Shao, harbored Xu (a minor) and other women to engage in prostitution activities in the foot massage shop. The charge for prostitution was 150 yuan per session, and it was agreed that for each prostitution session performed by Xu and others, the shop would receive a 50-yuan cut. On the evening of March 17, 2016, while Xu was having sexual intercourse with a client named Ji (who has been administratively penalized) at the foot massage shop, they were apprehended by the public security bureau. On May 6, 2016, defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered at the Zhengjiawu police station and made a truthful confession. During the court trial, defendants Deng and Shao raised no objection to the aforementioned facts, which were also corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu, Ji, and Wang, the decision on evidence preservation, the inventory of preserved items, lists and photos of confiscated items, the status of the individual business registration, the administrative penalty decision, proof of voluntary surrender, identification records and photos of the people involved, examination records and photos, the household registration certificates of defendants Deng and Shao, and the account of the case closure, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In late March 2016, Liu Moumou (in a separate case) in Zhenjin County stole a black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle, a red Haoda brand two-wheeled motorcycle, and a red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycle belonging to the victims Yu, Li, Zhao, and others. Knowing that these three motorcycles were obtained through theft, the defendant Du assisted Liu Moumou by riding the red Haoda brand and red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycles to a house he rented in a certain district of a certain city for storage and sale. He also introduced the defendant Yan to Liu Moumou to purchase the black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle. Defendant Yan, knowing the motorcycle was obtained through theft, purchased the black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle from Liu Moumou. According to the valuation by the Zhenjin County Price Appraisal Center, the Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle was valued at 5623 yuan, the red Haoda brand two-wheeled motorcycle at 4398 yuan, and the red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycle at 6097 yuan. It was further found that after the incident, the police recovered the three stolen motorcycles and returned them to the victims. On April 20, 2016, after being summoned by phone by the public security police, the defendant Yan voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his criminal actions. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Du and Yan during the trial, and there were statements from the victims Yu, Li, and Zhao, which were evidenced during the trial, examination, and verification. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, records of the arrest, identification transcripts and photos, inventory of seized items, inventory of returned items, chat records, criminal photos, situation explanations, and the conclusion of the price appraisal report from the Zhenjin County Price Appraisal Center (Zhi Gu Zi [2016] No. 26) are all on record and are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that on the night of May 30, 2015, at around 11 PM, defendants Gao, Hao, Luo, and others had a verbal altercation with victim Bai1 at the intersection of Wanhe Road, Gaoqiao Village, Industrial Zone, Cangqian Street, Yuhang District, because Bai1 looked at them a few times. Subsequently, defendant Gao gathered defendants Wang, Hao, Luo, and others, and, carrying baseball bats, steel pipes, axes, and other tools, chased the victim's group to the section of road by the Gaoqiao Village farmers' market, where they assaulted victims Hou1, Bai2, and others. As a result, victim Hou1 sustained fractures to the left humerus, ulna, radius, and fibula, with the injuries assessed as minor injuries of the first degree. After the incident, defendant Luo voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The evidence for the prosecution includes documents such as an evidence list, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, forensic medical injury assessment reports, identification records, and surveillance videos.


The People's Procuratorate of Xiaonan District of a certain city charged that around 4 PM on February 2, 2015, the defendants Tang and Tu went to the vicinity of a construction site on Dongyong Road in the High-tech Zone of a certain city and used knives to inflict multiple injuries on the victim Liu, with whom they had a debt dispute. According to forensic identification, the injuries sustained by the victim Liu constituted minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Tang and Tu turned themselves in to the public security authorities and compensated the victim for economic losses in the amount of 296,000 yuan. To establish the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented and read the following evidence during the trial: 1. Documentary evidence (① personal information; ② ID cards of Tu A and Tang A; ③ application form; ④ description of circumstances; ⑤ prepayment receipt and medical diagnosis statement from the Central Hospital of a certain city); 2. Testimonies of witnesses Yu and Duan; 3. Statement of victim Liu; 4. Expert opinion: forensic appraisal report by the Judicial Appraisal Center of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; 5. Identification record; 6. Audiovisual materials; 7. Mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, and receipt; 8. Confessions and defenses of the defendants Tang and Tu.


Upon trial, it was found that Liu (already convicted) lost money playing the fishing machine at 'Our Own Supermarket' at 658 Ganjiang Avenue in Ji'an County and sought trouble, leading to a dispute with the supermarket owner Zhou and the co-defendant He (already convicted), who placed the fishing machine. As a result, Liu asked co-defendant Zhou (wanted and at large) to mediate the issue, and the parties agreed to negotiate at the supermarket entrance. On May 27, 2016, around 2 PM, Zhou rallied the defendants Zhang, Luo, and eight others, who brought machetes and other tools, and they arrived at the agreed location in two cars. The co-defendant He (already convicted) also gathered his brothers He 2 (already convicted), He 3 (already convicted), He 4 (already convicted), He 5 (already convicted), and others at the location. After meeting, a conflict arose due to unsuccessful negotiations. Zhou and the defendants Zhang, Luo, and others retrieved machetes from their cars and pursued He and his group. In response, He's group also wielded machetes and metal pipes to join the fight. During the incident, He 2 retrieved an air gun from a car to intimidate Zhou's group, causing them to flee, and He's group chased them unsuccessfully and returned to the scene. Subsequently, He's group damaged the Toyota Highlander left at the scene with knives. During the melee, He, He 2, and He 3 sustained injuries. Medical evaluations determined these injuries to be minor. The damage to the car was assessed at


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that: 1. At approximately 3 a.m. on October 14, 2012, the defendants Liang and Wei, along with He and Wang (both handled in separate cases), and others, conspired and drove to Jindang Village in a certain town of a certain county, specifically to the "Jinxi" supermarket. They pried open the door and stole cash amounting to 22,000 RMB, as well as 25 cartons of cigarettes of "Zhonghua," "Liqun," "Furong," and "Dahongying" brands, and a rice cooker. According to the appraisal, the value of the cigarettes was 4,916 RMB. After the incident, the families of defendants Liang and Wei compensated Jinxi supermarket for the economic loss with a total of 30,000 RMB on April 18, 2013, and obtained forgiveness. 2. In the afternoon, around 3 p.m., in late October 2012, defendant Liang, along with He and Wang (both handled in separate cases), went to Yip's food wholesale department at Langanqiao Village in a certain town of a certain county. They attempted to pry open the door but fled when the shop's alarm sounded. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Wei during the trial and are corroborated by their previous confessions, the statements of the victims Chen and Ye, household registration records, price appraisal reports, identification transcripts, on-site inspection transcripts, the account of the arrest, and payment proofs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: At approximately 11:30 PM on June 16, 2015, the defendant Fang had a verbal altercation with the parking lot attendant at a shopping center in a certain district of a certain city over a parking fee. Subsequently, Fang drove his car into the parking barrier and damaged it before leaving. At around 11:58 PM on June 16, 2015, the defendant Fang, along with Liu, Wang, Liu A (at large), "Tian", "Lao Moumou", and others, carrying iron pipes, machetes, and other tools, went to the parking lot of a shopping center in a certain district of a certain city. There, near the entrance of the parking lot, they injured the victims Li and Zhao and damaged the parking lot's fee booth before leaving by car. About an hour and a half later, the defendant Fang, again accompanied by Liu and "Lao Moumou", drove to the parking lot and chased and assaulted the victim Wang A. After evaluation, the injuries sustained by victim Li were classified as minor injuries of the second degree.


The prosecution charges are as follows: 1. On September 8, 2013, at approximately 8:20 AM, the defendants Niu and Feng, stole a victim Wang's satchel from an internet cafe in Xinhua District, a certain city, which contained 9,000 yuan in cash. 2. On November 4, 2013, at about 7:10 AM, the defendants Niu and Feng, stole a Gold GN106 model mobile phone from a victim Liu in an internet cafe in a certain district of a city, assessed at 877 yuan, and stole a Known CV28 model mobile phone from a victim Mao, assessed at 591 yuan. 3. On the morning of November 19, 2013, at about 8:00 AM, defendant Niu was discovered by victim Li while stealing Li's backpack at an internet cafe in Qiaoxi District, a certain city. The police apprehended Niu upon receiving the report. Defendant Niu truthfully confessed to the crime of theft carried out together with Feng at the internet cafes and informed the police that Feng was in a certain rental place. Based on the information provided by Niu, the police arrested Feng at that rental place. During the trial, defendants Niu and Feng jointly returned a total of 10,468 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Niu and Feng in court and were corroborated by the statements of victims Wang, Liu, and Mao, the testimony of witness Li, the list of seized and returned items, appraisal reports, photographs of the stolen goods and crime scene identification, household registration evidence, and evidence of the arrests, all of which are sufficient for a conclusive determination.


The People's Procuratorate of Yufeng District, Liuzhou City, Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged: On July 11, 2015, at around 11 PM, the defendant Lan, at the place where he resided in the second residential area of the Special Transformer Factory, Building 5, Unit 2, No. X, XX Road, Yufeng District, Liuzhou City, discovered that a Yadea electric scooter belonging to the victim Li (valued at 2,490 RMB as appraised) was in a powered state and not locked. After conspiring with the defendant Wu, Wu stole the electric scooter. Wu later sold the stolen scooter and profited 450 RMB, while Lan gained 200 RMB. The illegal gains have been squandered and cannot be recovered. On April 21, 2016, at around 2 PM, Wu voluntarily surrendered to the police under persuasion. On the same day, around 10 PM, the police arrested Lan in the second residential area of the Special Transformer Factory, No. 1, XXX Road, Yufeng District, Liuzhou City. During the trial of this case, Lan's family had already paid 1,245 RMB to this court as compensation for the victim Li's economic losses. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Wu and Lan during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the following evidence verified through court examination: the case registration form, decision to file a case, the victim Li's statement, the confessions of the defendants Wu and Lan, the purchase invoice, the electric scooter's driving license, the recognition record and identification photos, the appraisal entrustment form, the price appraisal conclusion, the price appraisal detailed form, the notification of the appraisal opinion, the arrest report, the situation explanation, the household registration information of the defendants Wu and Lan, Wu's previous criminal record, the household registration information of the victim Li, and others. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient to establish the conclusion.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused: 1. One noon at the end of April 2019, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver the methamphetamine parcel at the traffic light near Guang'an Experimental Primary School to a man (Lin). Li received a transfer of 300 yuan via WeChat from the other party. 2. On May 2nd or 3rd, 2019, one noon, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver the methamphetamine parcel at the traffic light near Guang'an Chengnan Experimental Primary School to Yu, and Yu paid 320 yuan in cash. 3. At about midnight on May 4th, 2019, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver two methamphetamine parcels outside the Siyuan Hospital in the Chengbei District of Guang'an to Yu, and Li received a transfer of 500 yuan via WeChat from the other party. Around 15:00 on May 27th, 2019, the police arrested the defendants Li and Liu near the Haorenjia Supermarket in Chengbei, Guang'an. To establish the above facts, the prosecution presented documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; and identification records, among other evidence.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of December 25, 2014, Dong bought cumin beef, boiled meat slices, and scrambled eggs with tomatoes from the "Yikouxian" restaurant operated by Xu. His wife, Zhang, exhibited symptoms of poisoning after consuming the above dishes and was taken to Bazhong Central Hospital for treatment. On December 26, 2014, Zhang was diagnosed with acute nitrite poisoning by Bazhong Central Hospital. It was found that the chef at "Yikouxian" restaurant, Wang, had added nitrite purchased by the owner Xu to the beef for marination while preparing the cumin beef. On December 28, 2014, the Bazhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention sampled the leftover packaged dishes eaten by Zhang and others, and the test concluded that the nitrite content in the cumin beef sample was 886mg/kg. After the incident, defendants Xu and Wang compensated Zhang and obtained her forgiveness. In support of the above charges, the prosecution provided: the criminal case registration form, the decision to file the case, the victim Zhang's statement, expert opinions, basic personal information, medical records, discharge certificate, individual business license, and other relevant documents, as well as the confessions of defendants Xu and Wang.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 10 p.m. on May 17, 2014, Huang, Rao Yi, Gao, Shao (all have been sentenced) and others had a dispute with a KTV staff member named Fan over trivial matters in the Venus KTV of Jinjiang Hotel, Xushan Street, Cixi City. Subsequently, the KTV staff, including the defendants Shen, Chen, and Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, Chen Chao (all have been sentenced), engaged in a melee with the other party using baseball bats, fists, and kicks, causing injuries to both parties. According to forensic identification, the victim Shao’s injuries were classified as severe injuries of the second degree, the co-defendant Yao A’s injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, and the injuries sustained by victims Huang, Rao Yi, as well as co-defendants Hu B, Yu A, were classified as minor injuries. After being brought to account, the defendants Shen and Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. Following the incident, the defendants Shen and Chen, along with co-defendants Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, and Chen Chao, compensated the victim Shao for economic losses and obtained the victim Shao's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Shen and Chen during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by the testimonies of co-defendants Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, Chen Chao, statements of victims Huang, Rao Yi, Gao, Shao, testimonies of witnesses Fan, Feng, Shen Hong, Luo, Rao Jia, Lü, Ye, as well as the identification records, search records, seizure documents and photos, scene photos, medical records and injury photos, forensic evaluation reports on the degree of human injury, mediation records, receipts, letters of forgiveness, this court’s criminal judgments No. 1465, 1466 (2014) Yong Ci Criminal First Instance, the arrest process, and identification documents of the defendants Shen and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that between April 11 and April 20, 2014, defendants Kang and Hu, under the guise of private detectives assisting the victim, Yu, in investigating an extramarital affair, fraudulently obtained a total of 24,800 RMB from the victim, Yu, by demanding investigation fees and a security deposit. After the crime was committed, the families of the defendants Kang and Hu returned all the illicit money, which has been restituted to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Kang and Hu during the trial and are substantiated by their household registration certificates, list and photos of seized items, chat record photos, mobile text message photos, bank transaction details, Alipay transaction records, call records, refund proof, receipt; arrest process and situation explanation provided by police authorities; the statement of the victim Yu; testimony of the witness He; identification record and photos, search record; the confessions and defenses of defendants Kang and Hu and other evidence, sufficient for the conviction.


The prosecution agency charges that defendants Xu and Yao, in September 2013, arrived at a certain district and checked into Room 210 of the Jinlongwan Hotel at a certain location. The two conspired for defendant Xu to lure men to a rented room on the fourth floor of China Construction Bank, located on Jiefang Middle Road in a certain district of a certain city, for massages, while Yao would take the opportunity to steal from the men who came for massages. Specifically: 1. Around 8 PM on October 26, 2013, defendant Xu brought victim Mo to the rented room for a massage. During this time, Xu used her body to block Mo’s line of sight, allowing defendant Yao to enter the room and search Mo's clothing. After stealing cash from victim Mo, defendant Yao left the rented room and called Xu to inform her, upon which Xu made an excuse to leave. After successfully leaving the scene, the two returned to their hotel. After counting, it was found that Mo had been robbed of 4,700 yuan in cash. Defendant Yao received 2,700 yuan, and Xu received 2,000 yuan. 2. Around 8 PM on November 13, 2013, defendant Xu brought victim Lai to the rented room for a massage, again using her body to block the victim’s line of sight, while defendant Yao seized the opportunity to steal Lai’s property. After successfully stealing, defendant Yao informed Xu by phone. Police officers, who arrived on the scene due to reports of prostitution in the rented room, discovered Xu and Lai and arrested them. As police were leaving the


The public prosecution agency charges: On August 1, 2013, at approximately 12:00, defendants Zhou and Min agreed to a drug transaction with Zhang via telephone. Subsequently, Zhou and Min went to the vicinity of the Meiyan Cosmetics Store in Liulian Village, Qiansuo Street, in a certain district of a certain city, where they sold 0.87 grams of heroin to Zhang. Later, Zhou and Min were apprehended by police officers near the Guizhou Beef and Lamb Noodle Shop in Liulian Village, and 2.62 grams of heroin were seized from Zhou. During the trial, defendants Zhou and Min raised no objections to the above facts. The facts are also supported by evidence such as photographs of the heroin, mobile phones, lists of seized and returned items, the statement of the buyer Zhang, testimony of the witness Miao, records of searches, inspections, and identifications, detailed call records, the process of the arrest, and the forensic examination report, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendants Cao and Xu, after conspiring with Wang (handled in a separate case), on October 16, 2014, at around 17:00, at the north side of the entrance to the Xicheng Office in the Mudan District of Heze City, the defendants Cao and Wang, without cause, engaged in acts of provocation, using a machete to injure the victim Fan on the leg and back. They then escaped the scene in a gray "Ford" sedan driven by Xu, who was waiting to assist them. According to the appraisal, the victim Fan's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. The prosecuting authority provided corresponding evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges that defendant Gao, during his tenure from 2007 to 2011, violated regulations in the process of collecting pension security funds from construction enterprises. He was grossly negligent in his duties and failed to perform his responsibilities diligently, resulting in a shortfall of 507,542.2 yuan in pension security funds that should have been collected from relevant construction entities in a timely and adequate manner, causing significant losses to the state and enterprises. Defendant Wang, during his tenure from 2007 to 2011, also violated regulations while processing, reviewing, and issuing construction permits. He was grossly negligent in his duties and failed to perform his responsibilities diligently. Despite the pension security funds from the relevant construction enterprises not being paid in full and on time, he proceeded to process and issue construction project permits, causing significant losses to the state and enterprises. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing. There is documentary evidence such as the household registration certificates of the two defendants, a special receipt for pension security funds from construction enterprises in a certain province, application procedures for the issuance of construction permits from relevant construction entities, personnel appointment and removal notices from the Xian County Human Resources Bureau, and related documents from the Ministry of Construction, a certain province, and a certain city on the collection of labor insurance fees from construction enterprises, as well as witness testimonies from Cao and Yang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges: On November 26, 2019, defendant Wu called defendant Zou to purchase 400 yuan worth of drugs, including methamphetamine tablets and crystal meth, and transferred 400 yuan to Zou via WeChat. Zou spent 400 yuan in a certain district to purchase two methamphetamine tablets and some crystal meth from "Grandma" (Wang, who is being handled in a separate case). After purchasing the drugs, Zou drove to a newly built center in a certain district to meet with Wu. After the meeting, Wu and Ou got into Zou's car, and the three of them, Wu, Zou, and Ou, consumed the drugs together in Zou's car. On November 30, 2019, around 12 noon, drug user Ou contacted defendant Wu to request the purchase of 460 yuan worth of methamphetamine tablets and crystal meth and transferred 460 yuan to Wu via WeChat. Wu contacted defendant Zou to purchase the drugs and transferred 430 yuan to Zou via WeChat, making a profit of 30 yuan. Zou drove to a certain district in a certain city to find "Grandma" and spent 400 yuan to purchase two methamphetamine tablets and some crystal meth, making a profit of 30 yuan. Subsequently, near Ou's apartment in a certain district in a certain city, Zou handed over the drugs to Wu and then left. Wu was apprehended by the Public Security Bureau on the spot while handing over the drugs to Ou. On December 1, 2019, defendant Zou was arrested and brought to justice by the Donghu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. On November 30, 2019, defendant Wu was arrested and brought to justice by the Donghu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution read out and presented in court the testimony of witness Ou, on-site inspection reports, identification records, the process of the case being solved, population information, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Zou and Wu, among other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on March 31, 2014, at around 22:00, the defendants, Bao and Cai, carried tools such as a saw, a wrench, and pliers, and rode a motorcycle to the construction site of phase 2 of Jinshayuan Public Rental Housing in Sha County. They stole three bundles of copper core coils (valued at 11,380 RMB) from a transformer at the site. In the early morning of the following day, defendant Bao was apprehended while fleeing the scene. On August 26, 2014, defendant Cai was captured and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. The stolen three bundles of copper core coils have been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Bao and Cai during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Jiang, Huang, Lin, and Yao, the valuation conclusion from the Sha County Price Certification Center, the on-site inspection records and photos from the Sha County Public Security Bureau, the identification records and photos at the scene, the account of the apprehension process, the crime solving process, the list of seized items, the household registration certificates, and the criminal judgments from the Yanping District People's Court of Nanping City, Fujian Province (2011) Yan Xing Chu Zi No. 5 and the Sha County People's Court (2012) Sha Xing Chu Zi No. 24, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: At around 11 a.m. on May 5, 2015, in a residential area of a certain county, the defendants Yue and Bai, together with Bai A (handled in a separate case), engaged in a dispute and subsequent altercation with Ling B and his son Ling A over whether they could drive away a sedan. During the altercation, the defendants Yue and Bai, along with others, caused minor injuries to Ling A's nose and minor injuries to the eyes of both Ling A and Ling B.


The prosecution alleges that at around 3:00 PM on November 19, 2013, Zhang called the defendant Zhou to request the purchase of drugs. The defendant Ye answered the phone and informed Zhou of the situation. At approximately 4:30 PM that day, when Zhang arrived downstairs at Unit 1, No. 32, District West, Meiwan, a town in a certain city district, he called Zhou again to request purchasing drugs worth 70 RMB, specifically methamphetamine. Ye answered the phone and informed Zhou. Subsequently, Zhou came downstairs carrying a packet of drugs and sold it to Zhang for 70 RMB. As the transaction was completed, both were caught on the scene by police officers. The police confiscated a bag of white crystalline substance from Zhang (which, upon identification, was found to contain methamphetamine, weighing 0.43 grams), and 70 RMB of drug money was seized from defendant Zhou. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou and Ye during the trial and were corroborated by the testimony and identification record of witness Zhang, defendant Ye's confession during the investigation phase, defendant Zhou's confession and identification record during the investigation phase, their apprehension process, search warrant and search records, seizure list, photographs of drugs, drug money, and tools used in the crime, crime scene photos, on-site urine test report, situation statement, case explanation, mobile phone call records, criminal judgment and release certification, compulsory rehabilitation decision, police administrative penalty decision, physico-chemical examination reports, residence registration documents, and other evidentiary materials that are sufficient to establish the facts.


A local People's Procuratorate charges: At about 23:30 on October 20, 2014, at the intersection of Xihe Road and Huaihai Road in Santikou, Suixi County, Huang (some person) was driving a Honda Accord with the license plate Wan F××××× and made a right turn from west to south when the victim, Zhang B (another person), blocked the car and insulted Huang. Wu, one of the defendants in the Honda, had a dispute with Zhang B. When the defendants Li and Yu heard the situation and arrived, the three defendants used their fists and feet to injure Zhang B. According to a forensic assessment, the degree of Zhang B's injuries was classified as minor injury level two. Additionally, it was found that on November 5, 2014, Wu, Li, and Yu compensated Zhang B for economic losses amounting to 85,000 yuan. The two parties reached a settlement, which has been fulfilled, and Zhang B expressed understanding towards the actions of Wu, Li, and Yu. On November 12, 2014, the defendant Wu was arrested by the Huaibei Public Security Bureau. On November 14 of the same year, defendants Li and Yu voluntarily turned themselves in to the Suixi County Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, all three defendants confessed to the criminal facts. In court, defendants Wu, Li, and Yu did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which have been sufficiently substantiated by the dispatch of police incident registration, the course of events for the defendants being brought to justice, household registration information, the forensic assessment opinion, the victim Zhang B's statement, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Zhang A (another person), and Zhu (another person), as well as the agreement and receipt.


The prosecution alleges that from 2011 to 2014, the defendants Yan, He, Shao, Feng, and Qu and Hou (the latter two are being handled in a separate case) took advantage of their positions to embezzle and appropriate a total of 360,000 RMB in public funds. In March 2015, defendants He, Shao, and Feng took advantage of their positions to embezzle and appropriate an additional total of 90,000 RMB in public funds.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Hebei Province charges: At around 23:00 on June 15, 2014, the defendants Liang and Mo, together with Li (under arrest and at large) and Hua (true identity unknown, currently at large), without any reason, assaulted Lu and Yang A in front of the Binguoyuan Supermarket on Cha Yuan Street in Yutian Town, a certain county, causing injuries to Lu and Yang A. According to the North China Forensic Identification Institute of Tangshan City, Lu's injuries were classified as minor injuries. According to the Forensic Medical Appraisal Center of a certain county, Yang A's injuries were minor. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: the confession records of the defendants Liang and Mo; the statement records of the victims Lu and Yang A; the testimony records of witnesses Yang B, Dong, and Huang Liu; the on-site inspection records; the identification records; forensic injury assessment reports; household registration certificates, etc.


After the trial, it was found: On the morning of December 6, 2012, defendants Li and Zhang went together to the entrance of No. 3 gate of the Dongfeng Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. on Linjiang Street in a certain district of a certain city. They had an argument with Zheng over the issue of defendant Li's job assignment. Subsequently, defendants Zhang and Li punched and kicked Zheng, resulting in multiple lumbar vertebrae (transverse process) fractures, with the degree of injury constituting minor injuries. On March 26, 2013, defendants Zhang and Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the joint crime as described above. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Li made financial compensation to the victim, Zheng. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the court proceedings. Furthermore, they were corroborated by the victim Zheng's statements and identification records, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Xu, and Gao, an account of the incident, an explanatory note on the circumstances, a description of how defendants Zhang and Li were brought to justice, on-site investigation materials, a list of seized items, a return receipt, an evidence collection list, forensic medical injury assessment reports, public security administrative penalty decisions, and the household registration certificates of defendants Zhang and Li, which provide sufficient grounds for the determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that between September 10 and September 18, 2015, the defendants Chen and Chou used bird nets and other means by their own fish pond, located to the west of a certain place in Hengliang Community, Hengliang Subdistrict, a certain district of a certain city, to capture a total of 28 birds. According to the appraisal, among the captured birds were 2 night herons, 3 mynas, 2 black-tailed grosbeaks, 1 Eurasian magpie, 1 light-vented bulbul, 1 hoopoe, and 17 spotted doves, all of which are animals protected by the state either for being beneficial or having significant economic or scientific research value (known as "three have" animals). On September 18, 2015, the defendants Chen and Chou were apprehended by public security authorities and brought to justice. After being taken into custody, both truthfully confessed the above criminal facts, and the 28 captured birds have been seized by the public security authorities. It was further found that among the 28 birds captured by defendants Chen and Chou, 8 were already dead, and the remaining 20 have been released into the wild. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Chou during the court hearing and are corroborated by the defendants' previous confessions and defenses, the testimony of a witness named Huang, seizure order, the "Three Have" Protected Animal List, inspection records, identification records, physical evidence appraisal report, and other evidence. There are also records of the case registration and the process of the defendants Chen and Chou being brought to justice, proving the circumstances of the case's discovery and the apprehension of defendants Chen and Chou; household registration data shows that defendants Chen and Chou possess full criminal responsibility capability and other natural circumstances.


After examination, it was found that on April 29, 2014, the defendant Gong stole three blank "Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)" duplicates at a certain city's Hongshan District Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision and Inspection Station. Later, according to defendant Wei's request, Gong filled out one of them with the certificate number 4200093329 and sold it to Wei for 150 RMB. Wei subsequently provided this forged certificate to others for use. Later, the defendants Gong and Wei were apprehended by public security personnel. Neither defendant Gong, defendant Wei, nor their defense attorneys objected to the criminal facts and charges in the indictment. Wei's defense attorney argued that Wei was a first-time and occasional offender, usually well-behaved; he confessed voluntarily with a good attitude; the crime was less serious and posed little social harm, thus requesting the court to show leniency in sentencing. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the materials issued by the Hongshan Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, including the details of the arrest and investigation; the report materials; witness testimony of Hu; the seizure decision; a copy of the forged "Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)"; the original duplicate of the "Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)"; the proof and situation explanation provided by the city's Hongshan District Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision and Inspection Station and the city's Hongshan District Food and Drug Administration, among other materials; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Gong and Wei. This evidence is sufficient for conviction.


The prosecution charges: On October 11, 2015, the defendants Gao and Yang went to the hallway of * Tao Xiang Yuan, Yangshan Town, a district of a certain city, and used a pushing method to steal a Yamaha motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Moujia. The item was valued at 600 RMB. In mid-November 2015, the defendants Gao and Yang went to the entrance of * Tangqiao, the same district of a certain city, and used a pushing method to steal a New Century Yuanhao motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Mouyi. The item was valued at 500 RMB. After hiding the motorcycles, the two went again to the entrance of * Tangqiao, where they used a pushing method to steal a Haojue motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Moubing. The item was valued at 1100 RMB. After the case was solved, the aforementioned three motorcycles were returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Gao and Yang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhang Moujia, Zhang Mouyi, Zhang Moubing, the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Dong, the identification records, the list of seized and returned items, call records, certificates of conformity, invoices, the price appraisal conclusion, explanatory notes, the account of the arrest, the investigation of the criminal case, and the defendants’ criminal records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged: In the early morning of August 2, 2014, the defendant Yong had an argument with Zhuang over trivial matters at the Kelly Commune Community, Meicun Street, New District, Wuxi City. Yong then gathered defendants Chen, Wang, He, and others with steel pipes and other tools to the scene. A scuffle ensued between the parties, during which defendant Yong used knuckle dusters, and defendants Chen, He, Wang, and others used steel pipes to hit victim Zhuang on the head and other parts of the body, causing head injuries to Zhuang. According to the assessment, the injury constituted a Grade 1 minor injury. On September 3, 2014, the aforementioned four defendants were apprehended by the public security authorities, and later, defendants Chen, Yong, and He truthfully confessed to their crimes.


The prosecution charges: Defendant Cheng illegally possessed a homemade firearm left by his ancestors without obtaining a gun permit. On February 25, 2016, police officers from Miaogao Police Station of a county public security bureau, holding inspection permits, found this homemade firearm at Cheng's home, located at No. 11, Wuzhuang, Miaogao Street, a certain village in the county. After appraisal, the firearm was identified as a gun powered by gunpowder to fire projectiles and was lethal. In July 2014, defendant Zou illegally possessed a hunting rifle without obtaining a gun permit and later handed it over to defendant Cheng for safekeeping and use. On February 17, 2016, defendant Zou, along with Zhou, Wu, and Lei Jia (all handled in separate cases), went hunting on the mountain at "Fenglukou" in a certain village of Miaogao Street, using the hunting rifle to kill a wild boar. On February 25, 2016, officers from Miaogao Police Station of a certain county public security bureau, holding inspection permits, discovered the hunting rifle in the village collective warehouse next to Cheng's home at No. 11, Wuzhuang, Miaogao Street. After appraisal, this hunting rifle was identified as a gun powered by gunpowder to fire projectiles and was lethal. On February 25, 2016, defendants Cheng and Zou were summoned by the public security authorities and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. These facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng and Zou during the trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Lan, Zhou, Lei Yi, Wu, Lei Jia; the confessions and defenses of defendants Cheng and Zou; the evidence preservation decision and list, the seizure decision and list with photos; the inspection record and on-site photos; the item transfer list; the appraisal documents and opinions of firearms and ammunition identified as Ligungun Appraisal [2016] No. 14 and No. 18; the criminal judgment No. 10 (2009) Lisui Criminal First Instance; the process of being brought to justice; and the household registration certificates of defendants Cheng and Zou, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: In the early morning of November 4, 2014, defendant Xu had an argument over the phone with the victim, Gao, due to a trivial matter. Subsequently, the victim Gao asked the defendant Xu to meet in a certain town in this city. Defendant Xu then assembled defendant Qin, Zhu, and Li, Wang (both handled in separate cases) to go to A Er Noodle Shop near the large roundabout in that town. They used wooden sticks they had brought with them to fight with the victim Gao, who was armed with a kitchen knife. Defendants Xu, Qin, Zhu, and others beat the victim Gao, causing injuries. According to the Tongxiang City Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, the injuries sustained by the victim Gao constituted minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, defendant Qin surrendered to the public security organs on November 27, 2014, and defendant Zhu surrendered on December 4, 2014. It has also been found that the victim Gao and defendants Xu, Qin, Zhu reached an agreement on civil compensation, with the three defendants compensating 30,000 yuan, which has been fully paid. The victim Gao has issued a letter of understanding.