Upon trial examination, it was found that at approximately 22:00 on December 3, 2013, defendant Sun and Zhang had an argument over trivial matters at the "Golden Station" KTV in Zhongyang Mall, Fengcheng Town, in a certain county. Later, at the entrance of the KTV, defendant Sun punched victim Zhang in the face, and defendant Tang then approached and shoved victim Zhang to the ground. Subsequently, defendants Sun and Tang continued to kick victim Zhang, causing victim Zhang to suffer a comminuted nasal fracture, fractures of the fourth and sixth ribs on the left side, dislocation of the right shoulder joint, and a fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal bone of the right foot. After identification, the injuries to victim Zhang’s nose, right shoulder, and ribs were determined to be minor injuries, and the injury to the right foot was determined to be a slight injury. Defendants Sun and Tang voluntarily turned themselves into the police on December 30, 2013, and February 10, 2014, respectively, and truthfully confessed all criminal facts. Through mediation presided over by the court, defendants Sun and Tang reached an agreement with victim Zhang regarding civil compensation, paying Zhang 80,000 yuan and 95,000 yuan respectively, obtaining victim Zhang's understanding. The above facts were acknowledged by defendants Sun and Tang during the trial, and corroborated by written evidence such as the mediation agreement, receipts, understanding letter, testimony from witnesses Tian, Zuo, Li, Hou, and others, victim Zhang's statement, Forensic Medical Identification Certificate of Human Injury Degree No. 010 (2014) issued by the Criminal Technology Department of a certain county Public Security Bureau (Feng), Forensic Medical Identification Certificate of Human Injury Degree No. 98 (2014) issued by Xuzhou Public Security Bureau Forensic Unit (Xu), case initiation and detection report, the process of arriving at the case, identification records, on-site surveillance video, and defendants Sun and Tang's household registration certificates, which are sufficient to confirm.


Upon trial, it was found that between January 2013 and April 2015, the defendant Yi, during the production and sale of health supplements, knowingly added and packaged sildenafil (commonly known as Viagra powder), a substance explicitly prohibited for addition to health supplements by the state. Yi sold these products under names such as "Germany Enlarging Pills," "Golden Viagra," and "Unyielding Gold Spear," and on nine occasions, sold various aphrodisiac health supplements via logistics to the defendant Xie, with total sales amounting to 28,520 RMB, from which she earned over 9,500 RMB in profit. Defendant Xie, knowing that the aphrodisiac health supplements purchased from defendant Yi contained sildenafil, continued to sell them to individuals such as Zhu, Ni, Shu, Hu, Zhou, and Duan, with total sales amounting to 8,730 RMB, from which she earned over 3,000 RMB in profit. On June 4, 2015, the public security organs captured the defendant Yi in a certain city and confiscated a sealing machine and a coding machine used in the crime, as well as various health supplements and other items. Upon examination, all confiscated health supplements were found to contain sildenafil. The defendants Yi and Xie and their defense had no objections to these facts during the court proceedings, and there are witness testimonies from Lu, Zhang, Yang, Li, Zhu, Ni, Shu, Hu, Zhou, Duan, and others, along with logistics consignment notes, bank account transaction details, records and lists of seized items, sampling records, lists and test reports, identification records, and the course of the criminal case investigation, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts. Regarding the prosecutor’s allegation that "in May 2014, the defendant Yi sold aphrodisiac health supplements containing sildenafil to Xie for over 2,600 RMB," upon investigation, both defendants Yi and Xie stated that the payment was made through bank transfer, and then Yi mailed the health supplements to Xie through logistics. However, the prosecutor's provided bank transfer details between the parties lack any record of this transaction, and there is also an absence of other evidence to support the factuality of this charge, hence the court does not uphold this particular charge.


A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: From late February 2019 to early June of the same year, the defendants Yan and Zhu, after premeditating, established a mahjong gambling group on the social software "Xianliao". They organized group members to gamble by playing mahjong in the "Star Mahjong" app's friend circle room and took a commission of 5 or 10 RMB per game, illegally profiting approximately 100,000 RMB. On September 12 of the same year, the defendants Yan and Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The evidence supporting the charges includes documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions and defenses, extraction records, and identification records.


The prosecution alleges: On August 19, 2011, the defendant Shi, taking advantage of his position as a material handler at a city's Jianghe Curtain Wall Company, prepared a clearance slip under the pretext of selling scrap materials. The defendant Sun used this clearance slip to sell 78 sets of M48*185 cap bolts, which were stored in the company's warehouse on the seventh floor of the Gaode Land Plaza in Zhujiang New Town of the city, as scrap materials, obtaining a profit of 6,000 RMB. On August 20, 2011, Shi and Sun were apprehended and brought to justice. From Liu, who purchased the scrap materials, 78 sets of cap bolts were recovered as stolen goods, and 6,000 RMB in illicit proceeds were recovered from Lei.


The prosecution alleges: At approximately 1 a.m. on October 17, 2019, after prior planning by defendants Song, Meng, on a grass lawn on the west bank of the Tuhai River in the eastern part of Dongchangfu District, in a certain city, defendant Meng restrained the victim Yao (female, ID number: 371525200628) by controlling her hands with his hands and legs. To prevent Yao from calling for help, Meng covered her mouth with his hand, and defendant Song forcibly engaged in sexual intercourse with victim Yao.


After examination, it was found that at around 21:00 on October 28, 2013, the defendant Yang received a call from Mi to purchase 200 yuan worth of drugs while Yang was gambling with the defendant Liu and others. They agreed to conduct the transaction at Yang's residence located at a specified location in a certain district of a city. Subsequently, defendant Liu was responsible for going out to purchase the drugs and returning to the said address to hand them over to Mi. Mi then gave the 200 yuan in drug money to defendant Yang, who in turn gave it to defendant Liu. After the transaction was completed, Mi was apprehended by the police as he was leaving the scene. The police confiscated a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.28 grams from Mi. Later, the police arrived at the aforementioned location and arrested defendants Liu and Yang, confiscating a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.53 grams, a mobile phone used for drug trafficking, and 200 yuan in drug money from defendant Liu; and confiscating a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from defendant Yang. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yang and Liu during the court hearing. They were corroborated by witness Mi's testimony and identification record, witness Huang's testimony and identification photos, the arrest process, search record, inspection record, seizure record and list, physical evidence photos, criminal test report, mobile phone call records, household registration proof, prior criminal records, and the confessions and identification records of defendants Yang and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The Third District People's Procuratorate of [City] charged that at approximately 2:00 AM on July 20, 2014, the defendants Dong and Wang, after planning in advance, entered the administrative department of Jia Chang Toy Factory at No. 67, Qiao Jiao East Road, Qiao Long Community, [Town], [City], and stole three computer mainframes, two monitors, and an oscilloscope belonging to the victim unit, Dongguan Nuohua Logistics Co., Ltd., with a total value of 4813.47 RMB, before fleeing the scene. In the afternoon of the same day, Wang sold one of the computer mainframes and a monitor for 600 RMB to a pawnshop in the area. On the 21st, the public security organs recovered the stolen goods from the pawnshop. Dong, fearing responsibility, returned the remaining stolen goods and fled with Wang to evade capture. On November 15 and 23, 2014, the public security organs apprehended defendants Dong and Wang, who were detained for drug use, at a detention center in [City]. After the case was solved, the stolen goods involved were returned to the victim unit. The prosecution provided evidence including on-site investigation records, site diagrams and photographs, an assessment opinion on the value of the involved property, the process of getting the suspects, permanent resident information, a seizure list, a list of received evidence materials, a restitution list, the business license of the corporate legal entity, a list of property losses, interrogation videos, site identification videos, testimonies and identification transcripts from witnesses Yang Jia, E, Yang Yi, and statements from the victim unit's employee Yan Yong. The confessions of the defendants Dong and Wang were also included. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Dong and Wang constitute the crime of theft. Considering that Dong and Wang confessed their crimes truthfully after being brought to justice, it is recommended that this court sentence them to imprisonment for six months to one year and six months, and impose a fine. Defendants Dong and Wang raised no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations put forth by the prosecution and did not present any defense. Upon trial, it was found that the facts charged by the prosecution against defendants Dong and Wang for the crime of theft were clear, and the evidence was indeed sufficient; this court hereby confirms these findings.


The People's Procuratorate of Kecheng District, a certain city, charged that at around 23:00 on September 9, 2012, defendants Wei and Zhang, along with friends, were drinking at the Zuimei Bar on Sanqu Road in a certain city. The victim, Cheng, accidentally knocked over defendant Wei's beer while dancing, leading to an argument between Wei and Cheng. Defendant Wei then called defendant Zhang over, and together they assaulted the victim, Cheng. During the altercation, defendant Wei struck Cheng on the head with an empty beer bottle, and defendant Zhang kicked Cheng in the back, causing injuries to Cheng. Subsequently, the defendants fled the scene. According to the medical examination, Cheng suffered an epidural hematoma and a linear fracture on the right side of the temporal and parietal regions due to a head injury, which constituted serious injury. During the trial, both defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts. The facts are also supported by evidence including the defendants' household registration documents; the victim Cheng’s statement and outpatient medical records, surgical records (copies), and photos of the injuries; testimonies from witnesses Xu, Weng, Jiang, Yuan, Chi, Ye, Li, and Wei; identification records, a photo list of the identified persons, and identity statements of the identified persons; a forensic medical assessment of the extent of human injury from the City Public Security Bureau physical evidence identification office; the notification of expert opinion; receipts; a reconciliation agreement; a letter of understanding; arrest details; confessions from defendants Wei and Zhang; a site inspection transcript, site sketches, site photos; surveillance video discs, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Wei paid the victim 80,000 yuan in compensation and reached a settlement agreement with the victim and his family. The victim and his family provided a letter of forgiveness for defendant Wei.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on May 24, 2016, at approximately 1:00 PM, defendant Zhang saw Han, with whom defendant Zhao had previously had a dispute, near the Wusi Roundabout in Bincheng District, a certain city. Zhang then called Zhao, and the two drove a small car with the license plate LuM××××× to chase the victim Han's vehicle southward along National Highway 205 from the vicinity of the Wusi Roundabout. They stopped Han's vehicle 300 meters south of the traffic light intersection in a certain village, a certain town, a certain county. Afterward, defendants Zhao and Zhang got out of the car, and defendant Zhang injured the victim Han in the face. Later, a forensic evaluation determined that Han's injuries were minor of the second degree. On July 7, 2016, defendants Zhao and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. On July 14, the defendants' families reached a compensation agreement with the victim Han, compensated for the damages, and obtained understanding. The People's Procuratorate of a certain county believes that defendants Zhao and Zhang arbitrarily assaulted others, with egregious circumstances, and their actions constituted the crime of x, which should be punished in accordance with item (i) of article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Zhang during the trial. There is sufficient evidence to confirm this, including documentary evidence such as household registration proof, the compensation agreement, receipt, and photos of the scene; statements from the victim Han; confessions from defendants Zhao and Zhang; forensic opinion (Bo) Gong (Xing) Jian (Fa) Zi [2016] No. 0076 body injury evaluation report; as well as case acceptance registration form, police reception and handling registration form, and explanation of the case situation.


After trial, it was found that from April to August 2019, the defendants Yao and Zhang, for the purpose of making profits, organized gambling sessions using a certain poker game method multiple times and extracted profits at the VR Board Game Store at First Floor Street in Jingkou District and Room 1004, Jinyuan Building at 256 Liberation Road in this city. They illegally gained more than 50,000 yuan. On August 9, 2019, the defendant Yao was arrested by the police. On November 22, 2019, after receiving a phone notification, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the incident, the illegal gains of 50,562 yuan have been recovered. It was further found that the defendants Yao and Zhang voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. The prosecution recommended sentencing Yao to one year of imprisonment (with a one-year probation if probation conditions are met) and a fine of 25,000 yuan; and Zhang to one year of imprisonment (with a one-year probation if probation conditions are met) and a fine of 25,000 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yao and Zhang during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Wei, and others, the process of arrest, seizure decision, seizure list, WeChat chat transfer records, and the search record produced by the Jingkou Branch of Zhenjiang Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city charged: On August 24, 2019, at around 2 a.m., at "a certain bar" on a certain street in a district of a certain city, the defendant Liu had a dispute with the victim Guo over trivial matters. The defendants Liu and Zhang conspired to assault the victims Guo and Song and waited near the bar. Subsequently, the defendants Liu and Zhang used bricks to assault the victims Guo and Song, causing injuries to both. According to the appraisal, the injuries of Guo and Song were minor. The defense counsel for the defendant Liu argued: 1. The defendant Liu has circumstances of voluntary surrender; 2. The family of the defendant Liu compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. In summary, it is suggested that probation be applied. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhang argued: 1. The defendant Zhang has circumstances of voluntary surrender; 2. The family of the defendant Zhang compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. In summary, it is suggested that probation be applied. After trial, it was found that the facts of the crime charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city are true. It was also found that the case was reported by the victim, and the defendants Liu and Zhang both voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime. The families of the defendants Liu and Zhang compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Zhang during the court trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the letters of understanding, victim statements, defendant confessions, appraisal opinions, and identification records, sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charged that between the night of October 2, 2015, and the early morning of the next day, the defendants Dai and Sun entered Hangzhou Maichuan Technology Co., Ltd., located at X Futai Road, Zhongtai Street, Yuhang District, a certain city, by prying open the door. They stole 312 yuan in cash, 4 boxes of tin strips, 3 laptops, 3 computer hard drives, 3 optical modems, 2 switches, 2 mice, 1 router, 1 surveillance host, 1 computer mainframe, 1 telecommunication switchboard, and 92 spare keys. According to the appraisal, some of the stolen goods (4 boxes of tin strips, 1 Dell laptop, 3 computer hard drives, 3 optical modems, 2 switches, 2 mice, 1 router, and 1 surveillance host) were valued at 16,186.75 yuan, including the Dell laptop valued at 500 yuan. After the incident, the stolen Dell laptop was recovered and returned to the victimized unit.


After examination, it was found that in early December 2015, the defendants Gong and Tu engaged together in the business of trading virtual game currency for "Chenlong Online Game" at their home, located at Unit 2, Room 301, Building 8, Youth Community, Chengdong Street, District A, City B. Both Gong and Tu were fully aware that the game coins sold online by an individual known as "Potato" (handled in a separate case) were illicitly obtained by hacking into other people's game accounts and were therefore illegal "black points." Despite this knowledge, they still purchased them at prices below the regular market rate and resold them at higher prices to other game players. Gong and Tu took turns operating the computer each day to conduct business, using Tu's Alipay account to transfer funds to the Alipay account of the individual known as "Potato" to pay for the unlawful game coins. It was found that from December 22, 2015, to January 1, 2016, Gong and Tu transferred a total of 32,667 RMB to "Potato" to acquire these illegally-sourced game coins. On June 16, 2016, the defendants Gong and Tu were summoned by the police at Gong’s residence and brought to justice. They subsequently truthfully confessed the main facts of the case. After the incident, defendant Gong surrendered 33,000 RMB to the police. These aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong and Tu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witnesses "Yin1," "Yin2," and Qin, on-site transcripts, seizure orders and lists, Alipay account transaction records, Alipay record extracts, the process of being brought to justice, as well as personal information, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Gong and Tu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 12:00 on October 28, 2017, defendants Shen and Wang committed theft of a VIVO bar phone model Y67 from the jacket pocket of Hao at the market on Fangshe Road in a certain city. The City Price Authentication Center evaluated the value of the stolen phone to be 909 yuan. The stolen item has been returned to the owner. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial process, and are supported by the victim Hao's statement; testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhang1, and Zhang2; identification records and photos; site map; case notes; on-site inspection records; telecommunications records from Sanlian Communications; evidence receipt list; list of seized and returned items; arrest records; social investigation; defendants' confessions and their household registration documents, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of November 10, 2013, defendants Zhang and Wang, after prior discussion, rode a motor-assisted bicycle to the Xiangti Villa residential area in Pukou Street, Shengzhou City. Defendant Wang was responsible for keeping watch and providing assistance, while defendant Zhang climbed through the window into Unit 1, Room 302 of Building 53, the home of Xu, and stole 300 yuan in cash and a Samsung 9220 mobile phone. They then used a key to enter Unit 1, Room 802 of Building 52, the home of Zhu, and stole a black Acer laptop. The total value of the stolen property amounted to 2,280 yuan. After the incident, Shengzhou City Public Security Bureau seized a motor-assisted bicycle from defendant Zhang and an Acer laptop from defendant Wang, both of which have been returned to the victims. The motor-assisted bicycle is currently temporarily held at the Shengzhou City Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Wang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of victims Xu and Zhu, identification records, purchase receipts, on-site investigation records, seizure lists, return lists, arrest details, residence registration certificates, and other evidence sufficient to confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of Hangzhou City charges that in May and June 2016, the defendants Liang, Liu, and Li, along with Zhou (handled in a separate case), conspired to defraud the victim, Zhu 3, by setting up a gambling scam and planned to increase Zhu 3's desire to gamble by "drugging" him. Subsequently, defendant Liu recruited defendant Zhang to pose as a participant in the gambling game; defendant Li, together with Zhou and others, purchased and prepared psychotropic drugs and enlisted defendant Xu to partake in the gambling scam, facilitating the acquaintance of defendant Xu and victim Zhu 3 through SMS and WeChat, orchestrated by defendant Liu. On the evening of June 6, 2016, defendants Liang and Liu brought victim Zhu 3 to Box X in a certain restaurant in a town of the district, where defendants Liu, Liang, and Xu dined with him. During the meal, defendant Liang took the opportunity when victim Zhu 3 left the table to pour pre-prepared psychotropic drugs into Zhu 3's wine glass, causing him to ingest it. After the meal, defendants Liang and others took victim Zhu 3 to Box X in a chess and card room on Tangxi Road in the town, which Zhou and others had arranged beforehand. Defendants Liang, Liu, Li, Zhang, Xu, and Zhou collaborated to scam victim Zhu 3 through fraudulent gambling, resulting in Zhu 3 being deceived out of 4,800 RMB in cash and writing IOUs of 60,000 RMB and 70,000 RMB to Liang and Zhou, respectively. Afterward, the defendants, including Liang, repeatedly attempted to collect the amounts stated in the IOUs from victim Zhu 3 through phone calls, which were unsuccessful due to victim Zhu 3 filing a report. The evidence supporting the charges includes the victim's statement; documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, criminal judgments, and bank statements; forensic toxicology examination reports; records of evidence retrieval; confessions and defenses of the defendants, among others.


Through the trial, it was found: On September 12, 2012, at around 21:00, the defendants Sun and Yan, after drinking, intended to visit Wang Wei for recreation. When the two arrived at the entrance of Wang Wei's residence in a certain village, town, city, they encountered villagers Wang and Wang Jia, who came to look after Wang Wei's house. Subsequently, the defendants, Sun and Yan, unreasonably assaulted Wang and Wang Jia. As a result, Wang suffered a fracture of the left nasal bone and a fracture of the posterior lateral wall of the left maxillary sinus. According to forensic identification, the injury to Wang's left orbital area was classified as minor injury. After the incident, the defendants Sun and Yan were arrested and brought to justice by police officers from a city's Public Security Bureau on September 24, 2012. During the trial of this case, the two defendants reached an agreement on civil compensation with the civil plaintiffs Wang and Wang Jia. The above facts are corrobor


Upon examination, the court found: 1. On June 28, 2014, at around 11 p.m., defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang, together with "A Moumou" (pending separate trial), went to the intersection of 187 Xiabang North Road, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city and stole a a××××× Jinbei van (valued at 38,000 yuan) belonging to Jiang Province Telecommunication Engineering Construction Co., Ltd. 2. In the early hours of July 3, 2014, defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang, together with "A Moumou" (pending separate trial), drove a a××××× Jinbei van to 98 Ruilong South Road, Haicheng Street, Longwan District, in a certain city and stole 27 bags of hardware products (worth a total of 14,500 yuan). After the incident, the public security authorities recovered the above-mentioned property and returned it to the respective victims. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang during the court hearing and are corroborated by the testimony of victim Huang Mouyi, witness testimonies of Mao Mou and Huang Moujia, identification records and photographs, inspection records and photographs, seizure and return lists, the price appraisal report, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release upon completion of sentence, the administrative penalty decision, the arrest process, and demographic information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Shanxi Province charged: On the night of November 22, 2018, at 11 PM, Zhao Moujia, Wen Mouyi, Zhao Mouding, Zhao Moubing, and Zhao Mouyi were singing in a room at True Love KTV at the foot of the Drum Tower in the city. During their singing, Zhao Moujia and Wen Mouyi saw Tian Moujia singing in the adjacent room. After Tian Moujia left the room, they exchanged a few words before returning to their respective rooms to continue singing. Subsequently, Tian Moujia brought beer to drink with Wen Mouyi and others, leading to a dispute between the parties. Tian Moujia's sister, Duan, came into the room where Wen Mouyi and others were present. Duan smashed a tea table glass with a beer bottle in the room and assaulted and continuously insulted Wen Mouyi, Zhao Mouding, and Zhao Moubing. Duan's husband, Yan, then entered the room and insulted Wen Mouyi and others, and also physically assaulted Wen Mouyi and Zhao Moubing. Duan and Yan blocked the doo


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that between June 14 and June 25, 2014, the defendants Chen and Ying, after prior consultation, acted as agents for the gambling website "http://hg6610.com" in a certain city. Defendant Ying accepted bets from individuals such as Huang Jia, Huang Yi, and Wang, while defendant Chen placed bets on the gambling website, engaging in betting on soccer matches for gambling, with a total of over RMB 229,000 received in gambling funds from others and illegal gains amounting to over RMB 8,000. On August 20, 2014, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Sanjiang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed his crimes. After the incident, the public security organs seized RMB 4,000 each from defendants Ying and Chen and one mobile phone each from participants Ying, Wang, Gong, Zhang, Huang Yi, Shen, Huang Jia, Yao, and Zhou. The seized money and items are currently held by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ying and Chen during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Huang Jia, Wang, Zhang, Huang Yi, Yao, Zhou, Shen, Gong, Zhu, Qian, the electronic evidence inspection work record produced by the Cyber Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, assistance in inquiry of property notices, bank statement lists, seizure decision and list from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city dated December 11, 2014, showing RMB 4,000 each seized from defendants Ying and Chen, seizure decision and list showing one mobile phone each seized from Ying, Wang, Gong, Zhang, Huang Yi, Shen, Huang Jia, Yao, and Zhou by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the criminal judgment No. 10 (2002) Sheng Xing Chu Zi issued by this court, defendant Chen’s interrogation record at the Sanjiang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on August 20, 2014, the arrest process, and the household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that in December 2018, the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang reached an agreement for Zhou to organize gambling in the form of "Zha Jin Hua" at the venue operated by Ma and Zhang in a certain district of the city. Afterwards, Zhou, Ma, and Zhang would distribute the gambling proceeds among themselves. Investigation revealed that from the end of 2018 to January 2019, Zhou organized gambling activities with Zhang, Zhang, Li, Chen, Ma, and others on multiple occasions. Zhou's total gain from the gambling activities amounted to over 5,000 yuan, while Ma and Zhang each received over 700 yuan. On January 14, 2019, investigators from a district branch of the Urumqi Public Security Bureau conducted a lawful inspection of a poker room located at *** Wenquan West Road, *** in a certain district of the city, where they apprehended the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang and seized gambling funds totaling 27,000 yuan, three decks of poker cards, and one mahjong set, with Zhou accruing 1,500 yuan in gambling proceeds. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang during the trial proceedings, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Zuo, Ha, Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang, Ma, Wang, Li, Li, Wang, identification photos, onsite photos, inventory of seized items (documents), inventory of confiscated goods, administrative penalty decision, general payment slip for non-tax revenue in a specific district, rental contract, inspection notes, electronic evidence inspection records, case arrival report, and identity documents of the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon investigation, it has been found that on August 18, 2014, at around 11 PM, the defendants Guo and Cao were drinking with friends at the "Door" bar in Diamond Plaza, Haibowan District. They encountered the victim Shan, who was also drinking at the same bar. Due to a verbal altercation that occurred under the influence of alcohol, a dispute arose, and subsequently, Shan was injured by Guo and Cao. According to the assessment by Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute, the degree of injury suffered by the victim Shan was classified as minor injury level two. After the incident, the two defendants actively compensated the victim for economic losses totaling 100,000 yuan, and received forgiveness from Shan. It is recommended that the court impose a lenient punishment on the two defendants. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Guo and Cao during the trial, and they are substantiated by the victim Shan's report and statements; the confessions of the defendants; testimonies from witnesses Zhao, Li, Xiao, and others; documentary evidence such as basic personal information; the injury assessment opinion from Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute; audio-visual materials; and evidence such as the mediation agreement, receipt, and letter of forgiveness, which are sufficient for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in November 2013, the defendant Ji, together with He (handled in a separate case), after prior discussion, jointly undertook the project of transporting circular machines from a certain village in Huashi Street, a certain district, a certain city to Zhejiang Henglong Aramid Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain bridge economic development zone. On the morning of December 25, 2013, the defendant Ji, without formulating a hoisting operation plan and without assigning personnel for on-site command, instructed the defendant Wang to carry out hoisting operations within Zhejiang Henglong Aramid Technology Co., Ltd. The defendant Wang, despite being aware of the safety hazards in the hoisting operations and in the absence of personnel command, still proceeded with the operation in violation of regulations. Later, during the process of transporting the circular machines, due to the basket swinging, tilting, and rotating, Huang, Jiang, Lin, Fan, Yuan, and Wang A6 fell through the gap between the swinging basket and the third-floor landing joint, resulting in the death of Huang, Jiang, Lin, Fan, Yuan, and injury to Wang A. After the incident, the defendant Ji voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. To prove the facts of the charges, the public prosecutor presented relevant evidence in court.


The prosecution alleges that on March 24, 2014, at approximately 12:30 PM, the defendants Sun and Li entered Room 602 at No. 74 Taiping Lane Community, Chengxiang Street, Xiaoshan District, of a certain city, and stole a OPPO brand mobile phone and a phone case belonging to the victim Wang, valued at 2,162 yuan. After the incident, the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Li during the court hearing. The evidence includes the victim Wang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Yao, Xia, and Jian, the identification record, the on-site investigation record, the price appraisal conclusion, the list of seized items and photographs, the list of returned items, the list of confiscated items, the destruction list, the announcement, the house rental contract, criminal files, the community drug rehabilitation order, the public security administrative punishment order, the compulsory drug rehabilitation order, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the account of the incident, the situation explanation, the health and injury inspection registration forms upon admission, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Sun and Li, all of which are sufficient to establish the conclusion.


The prosecution authority charges that starting from November 2014, the defendant company, Yueqing Dongfeng Spring Manufacturing Co., Ltd., under the management and operation of the defendant Zhu, established a cleaning workshop within the company without approval from the environmental protection department. In this workshop, workers, including the defendant Wu, were arranged to use cleaning agents to wash stainless steel springs, and the wastewater from the cleaning process was directly discharged into the toilet sewer. The defendant Fu, a pipe worker for the company, directly managed the cleaning workshop. On April 2, 2015, this cleaning workshop was caught by the Yueqing Environmental Protection Bureau. According to the monitoring by the Yueqing Environmental Monitoring Station, the heavy metal zinc content in the sewage from the company's workshop restroom was 49.1mg/L (standard limit 5.0mg/L), and the heavy metal nickel content was 12.6mg/L (standard limit 1.0mg/L), both exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department has agreed to this test. It was further found that on April 3, 2015, the defendants Zhu and Fu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to their criminal conduct. During the court trial, defendants Zhu, Fu, and Wu had no objection to the aforementioned facts. The facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhi, Lian, and Nan, business licenses, agreement documents, records of the case process, monitoring reports and approval opinions, on-site inspection records, identification records, proof of prior convictions, household registration information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Upon examination, it was found that at approximately 23:30 on November 22, 2013, defendants He, Ma, Li, and He's friend named Li were in the same car. When the vehicle stopped at a traffic light at the northeast corner intersection of Diamond Plaza in Haibowan District, it encountered the taxi in which victim Gu was riding. Gu rolled down the car window and, upon seeing Li, made a "non-normative" remark. He wanted to beat Gu. The two cars stopped near Dongfanghong English School in Wuhai City, where the three defendants exited their vehicle and assaulted Gu, causing injuries to his head. According to the Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute, Gu's injuries were classified as minor. During the trial, victim Gu filed an incidental civil lawsuit in this court. Through mediation presided over by the court, the three defendants and victim Gu reached a civil mediation agreement, whereby the three defendants jointly compensated Gu for various economic losses totaling 45,000 yuan. Gu expressed understanding towards the three defendants and suggested the court impose a lenient sentence. It was also found that on March 4, 2015, defendant He was convicted of drug trafficking by the People's Court of Haibowan District, Wuhai City, and sentenced to four years of imprisonment with a fine of 2,500 yuan. The sentence was from July 8, 2014, to July 7, 2018. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the three defendants during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the prosecution's presentation of evidence such as the arrest process, defendants' basic information, inquiry into defendants' criminal records, Wuhai People's Hospital medical certificate, criminal judgment, etc.; Gu's report and statement; testimonies of witnesses Li, Lu, Zhang Yuyu, Wang Dong, Zhao Huahua, and Man; defendants He, Ma, Li's confessions; the Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute's opinion on the degree of bodily injury; and the written records of the three defendants identifying the crime scene, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that on July 12, 2019, the defendants Tan and Li discussed and subsequently stole the remaining copper core cables from the construction site of the Lianjie Street Station of Kunming Metro Line 4, where they worked. Afterwards, they sold the stolen goods. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables contained 175.39 kilograms of copper core, with a total value of 5,610 RMB.


Upon examination, it was found that the defendant He, due to a debt dispute with Wang, commissioned the defendants Ming and others to help him collect the debt. At around 9 p.m. on July 23, 2016, the defendant Ming, together with the defendant Xu, Feng (handled in a separate case), and others, went to Wang’s residence at apartment 401, building 37, unit 1, No. 10 Changchun Road, in a certain district of a certain city, and invited defendants Lu, Zhang, and Wei to come and help collect the debt. The defendant Ming also notified the defendant He to arrive at the scene. In Wang’s home, the defendant He and Ming demanded that Wang repay the money. The defendant Zhang hit Wang on the head with his hand. When Wang tried to hide in the bedroom to call the police with his mobile phone, Feng kicked open the bedroom door and grabbed Wang's phone. He, Ming, and others continued to force Wang to pay back the money. When the attempt to collect the debt failed, the aforementioned individuals drove Wang to the edge of a construction site at Hancheng Auto Park in a certain city, forced Wang to take off his clothes, and assaulted him, demanding repayment. The defendant Wei kicked Wang on the lower left side of his waist, causing three of Wang's ribs to fracture. Subsequently, defendants He, Ming, Lu, Zhang, and Wei took Wang to room 8232 of Baian Hotel in Maojian District, where Xu and Feng watched over him, preventing him from leaving. At around 6 a.m. on July 24, Wang escaped from the hotel while Xu


Upon trial, it was found: One day at the end of January 2016, defendant Ge proposed that a television set was needed. After discussing with Li, the two went to the victim Ji's residence (a rented room on the second floor of "a certain restaurant") on the west side of a certain street in a town in this city. They took advantage of an opportunity to sneak in and stole a Sanyo brand LCD television set from Ji's room, which Ge took home for use. According to assessment, the TV set was valued at 400 yuan. It was also found that defendants Ge and Li were apprehended by the police after the victim Ji reported the case. After being brought to justice, the two defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts and returned the television to the victim Ji. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ge and Li during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Ji's statement, witness Qiao's testimony, on-site inspection records, transcripts of crime scene identification, a price appraisal opinion, and case registration form, the case resolution process, an administrative penalty decision, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that, between April and July 2014, Zhang, Chen, Chen (all already sentenced), and Chen B (dealt with in a separate case) operated a casino for profit in various villages of this county. They repeatedly organized gatherings for over thirty people, including Liu C, Guo, and Xia A, to gamble in the form of domino Pai Gow, and extracted commissions from the winnings. During this period, defendants Guo and Xia repeatedly transported gamblers to the casino. On July 1, 2014, the Wencheng County Public Security Bureau set up a checkpoint on the road from one town's village to another and apprehended more than twenty gamblers, and seized gambling funds totaling over 70,000 RMB. On September 1, 2014, defendant Guo was arrested by police on Daqiao Road in a town within the county, and on October 30 of the same year, defendant Xia was arrested by police in a village within the county. The prosecution presented the following evidence in court: household registration certificates, proof of verification of criminal records, criminal judgments, and administrative penalty decisions as documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Liu A, Liu B, Lin, Huang A, Zhou, Wu, Cai, Pan, Lei, Dong, Liu A, Liu B, Liu C, Ye, Liu C, Guo, Huang, and others; confessions and defenses of defendants Guo, Xia, and co-defendants Zhang A, Chen A, Chen C, Chen B; and identification transcripts, among other evidence.


The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of August 12, 2015, defendants Lu, Gu, and Xiong went to No. 57, Liucitangbei, Liandu District, a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Gu acted as lookouts at the door while defendant Lu entered room 102, where the victim Li lived, and stole one "Xiaomi" mobile phone (worth 240 RMB) and one Vivo mobile phone (worth 770 RMB). Subsequently, defendant Lu entered room 202, where the victim Zhang lived, and stole one "Apple" 5C mobile phone (worth 1940 RMB), and a wallet containing 300 RMB. 2. In the early morning of August 12, 2015, defendants Lu, Gu, and Xiong went to No. 66, Guishan Road, Liandu District, a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Gu acted as lookouts at the door while defendant Lu entered the victim Wang’s room to steal. However, he was caught in the act by the victim and then fled the scene. After the crime, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victims. The actions of defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu violated the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, constituting the crime of X. Defendants Lu and Xiong are recidivists, and in the second criminal fact charged in the indictment, defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu were involved in an attempted crime. It is requested that they be sentenced according to the law. The above facts are without objection from defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu during the trial, and are corroborated by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and cross-examined in court: 1. Proof of household registration; 2. Statements from defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu; 3. Statements from victims Zhang, Li, and Wang; 4. Testimony of witness Chen; 5. Identification records, search records and photos, on-site identification records and photos, on-site inspection records and photos; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. Evidence receipt list and mobile phone invoices; 8. Details of arrest; 9. Criminal judgment; 10. Detainment decision and inventory, return inventory, hotel industry system query result list, etc. The evidence is indeed sufficient and adequate for conviction.


After trial proceedings, it was established that the defendants, Li and Xiao, while serving as the Party Branch Secretary and Director of the Village Committee and as a Village Committee member and accountant respectively in a certain village in a certain city, took advantage of their positions to embezzle national grain direct subsidy funds. Li, either alone or in collusion with other village committee members, conspired to misappropriate such funds on three occasions. Defendant Li committed the crime three times, misappropriating national grain direct subsidies totaling 10,780.12 yuan. Defendant Xiao committed the crime once, misappropriating 5,661.23 yuan. Before the case was uncovered, the defendants had returned 2,600 yuan of the grain direct subsidies to the Treasury Department of the city's Finance Bureau on June 13, 2011. After the case was discovered, the remaining embezzled funds were recovered and handed over to the national treasury by the procuratorate.

Specifically, Li, in April 2007 and April 2010, using his position, falsified claims of wheat planting areas of 17 acres and 37.01 acres respectively, embezzling grain direct subsidies of 1,475.26 yuan and 3,643.63 yuan, which he then illegally kept for himself. In April 2008, Li and Xiao, together with other village committee members, falsified claims of wheat planting areas totaling 67.42 acres, which allowed them to misappropriate and privately divide 5,661.23 yuan of national grain direct subsidy funds. Out of this amount, Li and Xiao respectively received 1,463.59 yuan and 1,116.80 yuan.

These facts were not contested by the two defendants during trial proceedings and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li Moumou, Zhang Moumou, Wan Moumou, Li Moujia and others; copies of the wheat subsidy forms, passbooks, and withdrawal receipts; evidence provided by the town's finance office; proof of farming areas supplied by the rural economic management bureau of the city; copies of the village committee's accounts; payment receipts and refund vouchers; employment certificates and household registration certificates of the two defendants. This evidence is sufficient to make a determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on April 17, 2013, the defendant Ma, while setting up a stall to purchase antiques in a village in a certain county, discovered that the villager Du's home had a pair of ceramic ewers with handles. He then conspired with defendants Zhao and Liu to steal them, conducting a preliminary survey on the same day. On April 19, 2013, the three defendants took tools such as bolt cutters to a village in the county. Seizing the moment when Du's house was empty, defendant Ma acted as a lookout at the junction, while defendants Zhao and Liu cut open the lock on Du's house, entering and stealing a pair of ceramic ewers with handles, a pair of lidded ceramic jars, and a statue of a certain Chairman Mao. The three defendants later sold the stolen goods for a total of 6,000 yuan, and the illicit proceeds were evenly divided among them. According to the appraisal by the county's Price Certification Center, the ceramic ewers with handles were valued at 5,000 yuan, and the statue of Chairman Mao was valued at 900 yuan. With Du's consent, the pair of lidded ceramic jars was not appraised. After the crime, the public security authorities recovered the pair of ceramic ewers with handles and returned them to Du. After defendants Ma and Zhao were apprehended, Ma's family compensated Du with 4,000 yuan, and Zhao's family compensated him with 5,000 yuan, both obtaining Du's forgiveness. On November 18, 2013, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. During the trial in this court, defendant Liu compensated Du with 2,000 yuan, also obtaining Du's forgiveness. During the court hearing, defendants Ma, Zhao, and Liu raised no objections, and evidence such as the interrogation record of the victim Du; testimonies of witnesses Wang B and Wang A; on-site inspection records, site maps, and site photos; identification records and identification photos; price appraisal report; inventory of seized and returned items; letters and records of understanding; the capture records of defendants Ma and Zhao; the proof of voluntary surrender by defendant Liu; as well as the confessions of the three defendants sufficiently prove the charges.


Defendants Peng and Yang voluntarily confessed, admitted to the facts charged by the prosecution, and are willing to accept punishment. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Peng and Yang during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by the victim Chen's statement transcript, witness testimonies from Yang, Li, and others, receipt and letter of understanding provided by the victim, and the case-solving report issued by officers from Xuebu Police Station of the Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.


After the trial, it was found that on July 15, 2015, police officers from the Xingning Branch of the Nanning Public Security Bureau, after receiving a report from the public, went to Room 2602, Building C, Jingrui Garden Community, Yongwu Road, Xingning District, Nanning, and uncovered a gambling venue using playing cards. At the scene, they arrested the defendant Tang and 25 gamblers including Pan, Huang B, and others. The defendant Shi was arrested near the Ruijing Garden. From the defendant Tang, police seized a deck of playing cards and gambling funds amounting to 2,100 RMB; from the defendant Shi, a walkie-talkie was seized. The defendant Tang was the dealer at the casino, while the defendant Shi was responsible for keeping watch. The above facts were not disputed by the defendant Tang and his defense lawyer during the hearing, and Tang voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. The defense counsel argued that Tang worked as a dealer to earn money to return home because he lost all his money gambling, and that Tang confessed his crimes truthfully upon being brought to justice, hoping for a lenient sentence. The defendant Shi also did not dispute the facts during the hearing and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court, arguing that he was a first-time offender and hoped for a lenient punishment. The facts ascertained through the trial, including the registration form of the case, details of the arrest, household registration certificate, list of seized items, testimonies of witnesses Liu, Huang A, Huang B, Wei, Wang, and Chen, the administrative penalty decision, identification transcript, scene identification transcript and photos, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Tang and Shi, are sufficient for determination.


A certain People's Procuratorate accused: 1. Around midnight on May 5, 2015, the defendant He, together with "Little Moumou" (handled in a separate case), stole one black Xiangsheng-brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Zhang Mouyi, and one blue Xiangsheng-brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Pei Mou. 2. From midnight to around 3 am on May 7, 2015, the defendants He, Sun, and Li Moumou (handled in a separate case) carried tools such as an "L" shaped socket and an iron tip, and committed theft three times in the Pingshan New District of Kengzi Street: stealing one light blue Lejiayuan-brand electric bicycle from the victim Yan Mou on Gongyuan Road, one white Xinyi-brand electric bicycle from the victim Zhai Mou on Zixing Road, and one purple Taishun-brand electric bicycle from the victim Zhou Mou on Shuangcheng Road. According to the appraisal by the Shenzhen Longgang District Price Authentication Center, the total value of the three stolen electric bicycles belonging to Yan Mou, Zhai Mou, and Zhou Mou was 1,400 RMB. The value of the stolen electric bicycles belonging to Zhang Mouyi and Pei Mou could not be determined. The defendant He, Sun raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, and the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Physical and documentary evidence: photos of the stolen electric bicycles, identity documents, capture process, criminal history comparison report; 2. Witness testimony: testimony of the witness Zhang Moujia; 3. Victim statements: statements from the victims Yan Mou, Zhai Mou, Zhou Mou, Zhang Mouyi, and Pei Mou; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of the defendants He, Sun; 5. Appraisal opinion: conclusion report on the appraisal of the value of the property involved; 6. Records of inspection, examination, identification, and investigative experiments: crime scene inspection records and photos, identification records, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that Xiong (already sentenced), along with defendants Shen and Pan, conspired to illegally sell earthwork. Xiong was responsible for contacting Deng from Jiangxi Chengchi Company. Shen was responsible for counting vehicles at the theft site, while Pan was responsible for coordinating relationships with urban management and other parties. On August 21, 2016, at around 22:00, Xiong and Shen organized dump trucks and excavators to illegally excavate earthwork on the wasteland opposite the Agricultural University Technology Market, located on Lushan Middle Avenue in a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone, achieving approximately 63 truckloads. The stolen earthwork was transported to a certain High-tech Zone along the North Riverside Expressway site. On August 24, 2016, at approximately 22:00, Xiong and defendant Shen again organized vehicles to steal earthwork at the same location. After transporting about 32 truckloads of earthwork to the same High-tech Zone construction site, they were discovered and stopped by staff from the Agricultural University Security Office, who then reported the incident to the police. Testing determined that a total of 1,434.1 cubic meters of earthwork was stolen. An appraisal valued the stolen earthwork at 5,736 RMB. It was further uncovered that at 23:00 on August 24, defendant Shen voluntarily surrendered himself to the police station. On February 10, 2017, at 11:00 am, defendant Pan voluntarily reported to the police station to cooperate with the investigation after receiving a telephone summons from the police. These facts, which the two defendants did not dispute during the court proceedings, are corroborated by Xiong's confession, the report by Chen from the Jiangxi Agricultural University Security Office, testimonies from witnesses Zhang and Wan, the administrative penalty decision, the site inspection report, site photos, identification record, resident information form, arrest documentation, situation statement, letter of understanding, and valuation appraisal, providing ample evidence for conviction.


Defendants Lin and Liu voluntarily plead guilty, acknowledge the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution agency, and are willing to accept punishment. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Lin and Liu during the court hearing and are sufficiently substantiated by the statements of victims Yin and Zhu, the testimonies of witnesses Zheng 1 and Zheng 2, identification records, transfer records, the seizure order and inventory, and the case investigation report provided by officers from the Xicheng Police Station of the Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in a certain province charged: On the afternoon of January 17, 2020, defendant Xia, during the process of selling waste cardboard to defendant Fan at his residence in Room 604, Building 4, Yongrun Garden, Nanfeng Town, a certain city, both defendants did not carefully observe the situation downstairs. They jointly threw the bundled cardboard directly from a location downstairs, causing injury to the victim, Yuan, who was passing by below. Yuan was subsequently pronounced dead on January 19, 2020, after unsuccessful rescue attempts. According to the appraisal, Yuan's condition was consistent with suffering from coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and sustaining head and chest injuries due to blunt external force, ultimately resulting in acute respiratory and circulatory failure. Both the trauma and the underlying disease were considered equal factors in the cause of death. After the incident, defendants Xia and Fan voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. They have compensated the victim's close relatives, who have expressed forgiveness. On December 28, 2020, defendants Xia and Fan voluntarily signed a confession and plea agreement in the presence of a duty lawyer, expressing their willingness to plead guilty. It is recommended that defendants Xia and Fan each be sentenced to one year of imprisonment with probation for the crime of [specific charge]. Defendants Xia and Fan have no objections to the charges, the crime, or the sentencing recommendations, and have signed to this effect. Testimonies from witnesses Gu, Bao, Ye, Zhang, Lu, Shen, and Xu, along with on-site inspection records, weighing records, relevant photos, retrieved medical records of the victim, forensic appraisal opinions from the Judicial Appraisal Center of Suzhou University and the Institute of Forensic Science, receipts, case and arrest reports, population information, investigation and assessment reports, confessions and identification records of defendants Xia and Fan, and other evidence, sufficiently establish the facts, which this court confirms.


The prosecution alleges that the defendants Wang and Yu seized other people's property of considerable value. Their actions respectively violate the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for Crime X. Since both defendants are deaf and mute individuals committing crimes, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China applies. Evidence such as documentary evidence, confessions from the defendants, statements from the victims, and witness testimonies were provided to substantiate the allegations. The defendants Wang and Yu do not object to the facts and charges presented by the prosecution. The defense's argument is that both defendants are deaf and mute, and both truthfully confessed their criminal acts after being captured and voluntarily pleaded guilty, requesting lenient punishment. After trial, it was found that on January 16, 2016, at about 13:30, the defendants Wang and Yu planned to seize after conspirating; in a village street in a town in a certain city, defendant Yu waited on a motorcycle to keep watch, and defendant Wang got off to snatch more than 5,300 yuan from Zhang. They later divided and squandered the spoils. It was also found that defendant Wang was arrested on March 2, 2016, and defendant Yu was arrested on March 7, 2016. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Yu during the trial. Furthermore, the facts are sufficiently supported by evidence presented and verified in court, such as the registration form of the case, the arrest details and explanation, the process of solving the case, victim Zhang's statement, the fingerprint identification report from the public security bureau, identification records and photos, deaf-mute test medical records, and household registration certificates, proving the fact that the defendants Wang and Yu committed Crime X. During the trial, regarding the sentencing facts and circumstances of the two defendants, the prosecution suggested that since the defendants voluntarily pleaded guilty in court and are both deaf and mute individuals committing crimes, they should be given a lighter punishment.


After trial, it was found that: 1. Between early August 2013 and August 15, 2013, defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia formed a group, with Zhong holding a 40% share, Chen holding a 40% share, and Xia holding a 20% share. They operated a casino for profit on the second floor of Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city, using the "Flower Digging" method. They gathered Zhu, Yan, Huang (the first), and others to gamble. During the operation of the casino, a total profit of more than 100,000 RMB was made from collecting fees from the dealers. 2. In early August 2013, defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia formed a group, in which Zhong held a 40% share, Chen held a 40% share, and Xia held a 20% share. They operated a casino for profit on the second floor of Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city, using the "Thirteen Cards" method. They gathered Xu, Ji, Zhu, and others to gamble. They made a profit of more than 10,000 RMB from collecting fees from the dealers. In the early morning of August 15, 2013, police officers from the police station of a certain town under the Wenling City Public Security Bureau arrested defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia at Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city. After being apprehended, all three defendants truthfully confessed their involvement in the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia during the court trial. Additionally, these facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu, Ji, Zhu, Huang (the first), Yan, Lin, Pan, Ruan, Luo, Hong, Teng, Di, and Huang (the second); inspection records; evidence preservation decisions; evidence preservation lists; the administrative punishment decision against Zhu and others; household registration certificates of the defendants; and the proof of the defendants' apprehension, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of Gaocheng District in a certain city charges: Starting from May 2018, without the approval of the administrative authorities and without obtaining sand mining permits, Zhang (at large) and Jiang (at large) established a sand pit at a section of the Hutuo River, located 2 kilometers northwest of the sewage treatment plant in Gaocheng District. Ma (at large) set up a dry sand field in the old cement factory courtyard along Dongning Road, located westward from the sewage plant entrance in Gaocheng District. Defendants Zhang and Du were responsible for issuing invoices in the sand pit; defendant Yang operated Zhang's loader to dig and load sand in the pit; defendant Shen operated Ma's loader to load sand for purchasing vehicles at the dry sand field; defendants Xu, Zhao, Liu operated Ma's discarded dump truck to transport river sand from the sand pit to the dry sand field; defendant Nie operated his own discarded dump truck to transport river sand from the sand pit to the dry sand field. According to the survey conducted by Hebei Liyan Geological Exploration Technology Service Co., Ltd., a total of 12,540 cubic meters of construction-grade fine sand was extracted. As appraised by the price certification center of Gaocheng District in a certain city, the market price is 356,638 yuan.


After trial, it was found that at approximately 9 p.m. on July 26, 2014, defendants Qin and Zhang were involved in a dispute over clients for their respective small hotels, which led to a physical altercation in the hallway on the first floor of Unit 1, Building 19, Wansongyuan Community, a district in this city. During the conflict, defendant Qin used a machete to inflict injuries on defendant Zhang's face and arm, while defendant Zhang used a kitchen knife to inflict injuries on defendant Qin's shoulder and arm.

The Hubei Zhongzhen Forensic Identification Institute, entrusted by the public security authorities, issued a forensic opinion stating that defendant Zhang had multiple wounds on his face with a total length of more than 10 cm, had an external fixation with plaster on his left forearm, and his functional wound was not available for examination. The injury was classified as minor injury level one. Defendant Qin sustained a 3.2 cm wound on his left shoulder, an 8.9 cm wound on his left upper arm, and a 15.2 cm wound on his right upper arm. His injuries were classified as minor injury level two.

After the incident, defendants Qin and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on August 27 of the same year. It was also found that after the incident, defendants Qin and Zhang had reached a mediation agreement regarding mutual civil compensation. Defendant Qin compensated defendant Zhang for economic losses totaling 20,000 RMB (already paid). Both defendants voluntarily waived their rights to pursue civil compensation from each other and expressed mutual understanding.

These facts were undisputed by the defendants during the trial. There is sufficient evidence to confirm these facts, including photos of the injuries, the compensation agreement, receipts, documentation of criminal understanding, basic population information, information from the national illegal and criminal personnel resource database inquiry, paperwork concerning the arrest and case resolution by public security authorities, witness testimonies from Xu and Zhang A, and forensic opinions.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on May 23, 2014, at approximately 3:15 a.m., the victim, Sun Mouli, was riding a bicycle past the section in front of the village committee of Longgang Street in a certain district of a certain city when he was stopped by the defendants Xu and Bi. Xu, holding a wooden stick, threatened Sun Mouli, demanding that he hand over his money, and instructed Bi to search Sun Mouli. Upon seeing this, Sun Mouli resisted and then fled. A bicycle left at the scene by Sun Mouli (valued at 80 yuan according to appraisal) was taken by a friend of Xu and Bi, Wei Moumou. After the victim reported the incident, the public security authorities arrived at the scene and confiscated the bicycle, returning it to the victim, Sun Mouli. On May 23, 2014, the defendants Xu and Bi were arrested at their residence in a certain area of Tongle, a certain village, in a certain district. To verify the facts of the charges, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, records of inspections, examinations, identifications, investigation experiments, and audio-visual materials.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charged that on the evening of November 14, 2014, the defendant Zhu had a dispute with Zhang Jia over a trivial loan matter in a rental room near Chenghuang Temple in Juexi Street of a certain county, which was later stopped by others. Subsequently, the defendant Zhu, Zhang Jia, and Zhang Yi, among others, had another altercation and fight near the entrance of Chenghuang Temple in Juexi Street. Upon seeing this, the defendants Cai and Wang approached and joined the defendant Zhu in punching and kicking Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and others. Later, the defendants Zhu and Wang chased and beat Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and others with iron rods. The defendant Zhu used an iron rod to beat Zhang Yi, causing injuries to Zhang Yi. The appraisal showed that due to this injury, Zhang Yi suffered a fracture of the fourth metacarpal bone in his right hand, with dislocation of the fracture site (complete fracture), and the injury constituted a minor injury of the second degree. After arriving at the scene, the defendant Zhu truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. On January 29, 2015, the defendants Cai and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the county's public security bureau and both truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. After the incident, the defendant Zhu reached a settlement agreement with Zhang Yi regarding civil compensation. At present, the defendant Zhu has paid Zhang Yi 60,000 RMB in compensation as agreed in the settlement, and the defendants Zhu, Cai, and Wang have all received Zhang Yi's forgiveness. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Zhu, Cai, and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victim Zhang Yi, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Yang, and Kong, identification records, surveillance video, injury appraisal report from the County Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, medical records, settlement agreement, administrative penalty decision, account of the case, permanent residence inquiry, household registration certificates, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found that in 2013, the victim, Liu Moujia, and a fellow townsman named Wang Mouchuang were gambling in a rental house in Songgang Street, Bao'an District of a certain city. Wang Mouchuang borrowed 10,000 yuan from the defendant Zhu. After Wang Mouchuang left the area, defendant Zhu could not find him and then demanded that Liu Moujia repay the money. On June 23, 2014, at around 22:00, the victim Liu Moujia encountered Zhu in the clothing city on Tangxia Street, Songgang, Bao'an District. Defendant Zhu took Liu to a mahjong parlor and contacted defendant Shen and two other men (handled in another case). After Shen and others arrived at the mahjong parlor, Shen drove a three-wheeled motorcycle with Liu Moujia, Zhu, and others to a certain section of the road and threatened Liu Moujia to repay the money. During this period, Liu Moujia refused to get on the vehicle, resulting in Zhu slapping him once, and then defendant Shen also slapped Liu Moujia once. Later, Zhu and the others took Liu Moujia to a mahjong parlor and forced him to write an IOU for 10,000 yuan. After Zhu promised to give Shen 500 yuan, defendant Shen, around midnight on June 24, took the victim Liu to his home at No. 40-4, San Village Street, Songgang. Zhu contacted others by phone to guard the victim Liu Moujia and forced Liu Moujia to seek money through phone calls. By about 11:00 that day, Zhu slapped Liu Moujia again while pressuring him for money. Liu Moujia's sister, Liu Mouyi, received a phone c


The People's Procuratorate of Huaiyin District in a certain city charged that on the night of October 23, 2014, defendants Zhang, Xu, together with Wang (handled in a separate case), went to the Aixin Jiayuan Residential Area in Matou Town, Huaiyin District of a certain city. At Wang's suggestion, they used methods such as prying open garage locks to commit theft. Defendants Zhang and Xu were responsible for keeping watch and transporting the stolen goods. The three of them jointly stole an Edison brand electric vehicle and two sets of electric vehicle batteries from the garage of Tang, an Aima brand scooter and a charger from the garage of Wang, an Aixinma brand electric vehicle from the garage of Jin, a Lepeng brand electric tricycle and a set of batteries locked to the stair railing at Yang's residence, and a set of batteries from an electric vehicle parked at the staircase entrance of Chen's residence. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen electric vehicles and batteries was RMB 11,738. After the crime, defendants Zhang and Xu were apprehended and brought to justice on May 10 and May 12, 2015, respectively. After being brought to justice, both defendants were able to truthfully confess to the criminal facts. Additionally, during the trial phase at this court, the two defendants returned the stolen funds amounting to RMB 11,738. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendant Zhang during the court trial and were corroborated by statements from victims Tang, Wang, Jin, Yang, Chen, testimony from non-appearing witnesses such as Yi, identification records, purchase receipts and certificates of conformity for the stolen electric vehicles, administrative penalty decisions, and evidence regarding the case-solving process, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain province charged that on October 15, 2016, the defendants Zhang and Liu drove a JAC Refine business vehicle with the license plate Jin AF28** and without a tobacco transport permit. They purchased 3,000 cartons of Golden Monkey King cigarettes from the warehouse of a liquor store in a town in the southern suburb of a city in a certain province at the price of 46.5 yuan per carton, paying a total of 139,500 yuan. They intended to transport them to a certain county for sale to earn the price difference. However, they were caught on the spot by the staff of the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of that county at the Tuba Highway entrance. The Luliang City Tobacco Monopoly Bureau's price certification determined that the price of the cigarettes illegally trafficked by Zhang and Liu was 165,000 yuan. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the public prosecution authority presented to the court the defendants' confessions, witness testimonies, tobacco product quality supervision and inspection identification report, price verification form, documentary evidence, and other evidence.


The prosecution charges that, starting from October 2013, the defendants Huang, Yu, Fang, Li, Chen, Pan, and Zhou consecutively joined a pyramid scheme organization and engaged in illegal pyramid scheme activities in a certain location. On June 3 and June 26, 2014, the victims Peng and Qia were successively deceived into a pyramid scheme hideout located in Building Four, Unit One, Fourth Floor, Yijing Community, in a certain location. Huang organized Yu, Fang, Li, Chen, Pan, Zhou, and others to illegally restrict the personal freedom of Peng and Qia, not allowing them to leave the pyramid scheme organization and forcing them to pay money to purchase "products." On July 7, 2014, the victims Peng and Qia were rescued from the pyramid scheme hideout by public security officers. Regarding the above accusations, the prosecution has submitted victim statements, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, and on-site evidence.


After trial, the following facts were ascertained: Around 1:00 a.m. on December 9, 2013, Sun and her friends were dancing at the "Balala" bar on Wanrun Commercial Street in a certain district of a city, when they were harassed by a stranger. Later, the stranger left. Sun and her friends then contacted the defendant Li (Sun's husband), who subsequently contacted the defendant Yin and others to drive and look for the stranger to demand an explanation. When the defendants Li and others were driving near the "Bubugao" restaurant by the roadside near Hualian in a certain district, they encountered the victims Ye, Bian, and others. Since Sun identified that Ye was present and knew the stranger during the conflict with the stranger, the defendants Li and Yin chased Ye with weapons such as military daggers and axes for over a hundred meters, causing him to fall and then they assaulted him. They then forcibly took him back to the "Balala" bar, where they punched and kicked him again, threatening him to provide the stranger's phone number. Later, when the victim Bian and the stranger went to the "Balala" bar to investigate, Li, Yin, and others chased and attacked them with weapons. According to forensic identification, Ye suffered multiple soft tissue injuries and exposed dental pulp, assessed as minor injuries; Bian had soft tissue wounds on the torso, assessed as slight injuries. After being brought to justice, the defendants Li and Yin truthfully confessed their criminal acts. During the trial, the close relatives of defendants Li and Yin reached and fulfilled an agreement with victims Ye and Bian regarding civil compensation, and victims Ye and Bian expressed forgiveness to defendants Li and Yin. The facts mentioned above were also undisputed by defendants Li and Yin during the trial, supported by documentary evidence, witness testimonies from Sun and Liu who did not appear in court, statements from victims Ye and Bian, and confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Yin, as well as forensic expert legal documents No. 1930, No. 1953 from the Municipal Police Department Evidence Identification Institute. These evidence are sufficient to determine the facts. The defense opinions from Li's and Yin's defense attorneys, stating that defendants Li and Yin have shown frankness and actively compensated the victims obtaining their forgiveness, are consistent with the facts established in this case and are hereby accepted by this court according to law.


The People's Procuratorate of Qingyang District in a certain city charged: At approximately 6 a.m. on June 7, 2017, after conspiring together, the defendants Qi and Ba purchased a Wuling Hongguang van with license plate number Sichuan AX** at the roadside in a certain area of the city for 3,500 yuan (appraised value 31,931 yuan). The van contained 10 boxes of cherries (appraised value 6,500 yuan). Qi and Ba later parked the van in the basement level two of a parking lot located at No. 2, Section XX, First Ring Road, XX District of the city. Officers on patrol in the vicinity found the vehicle suspicious. Upon investigation, it was discovered that this vehicle had been stolen from the victim, Ma, at around midnight on June 7, 2017. The police then conducted surveillance. At around 7 p.m. on June 7, 2017, Qi and Ba were apprehended when they arrived at the parking lot to retrieve the van. The stolen vehicle has been returned to the victim. The above facts are substantiated by the following evidence, which was presented and cross-examined in court: 1. The process of how defendants Qi and Ba came to light and their identification information; 2. Photos of defendants Qi and Ba identifying the scene; 3. On-site inspection records and photos, surveillance screenshots; 4. Seizure decision, seizure records, seizure and return lists, receipt; 5. Identification records; 6. Statement from the victim, Ma; 7. Price appraisal report issued by the Price Appraisal Center of Qingyang District for the stolen van and the cherries on the vehicle; 8. Confessions from defendants Qi and Ba. The two defendants raised no objection to the criminal facts and evidence mentioned above, which this court hereby confirms in accordance with the law.


The prosecution alleges that between May and July 2016, the defendants Wang and Chen successively organized gambling activities at "Lijing Hotel," "Renhe Hotel," "Yanzhi Holiday Hotel," "Aili Grand Hotel," "Qimai Runfu," and other locations in a certain county, involving individuals such as Chai, Shi, Zou, Yang, and Ma. They conducted gambling more than ten times using the poker game "Zha Jin Hua." Each gambling session had more than four participants, with a total of over 40 people involved in the gambling process. Through these activities, Wang and Chen cumulatively profited tens of thousands of yuan by taking a cut from the gambling stakes.


The prosecution alleges that on December 27, 2017, Songtao Jin Company Trade Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Jin Company") and Guizhou Deruibang Commercial Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Deruibang Company") signed the "Commercial Service Management Contract," agreeing that Deruibang Company would be responsible for attracting businesses to settle in and manage commercial operations at a shopping plaza in a certain county in Songtao. The legal representative of Deruibang Company, defendant Dong, entrusted defendant Luo with the task of attracting businesses. In April 2018, defendant Luo negotiated and facilitated the entry of businessman Yang Moujiang into the shopping plaza to operate a shoe store.

Defendants Dong and Luo, being aware that the renovation subsidy for Yang Moujiang was 180,000 yuan, conspired and had Dong create a fake contract under Deruibang Company's name for a renovation subsidy of 350,000 yuan with Yang Moujiang, which they submitted to Jin Company to claim the subsidy. Subsequently, Dong used the forged contract to claim a 350,000 yuan renovation subsidy from Songtao Jin Company Trade Co., Ltd. During the renovation, due to budget overruns, Yang Moujiang requested an additional 40,000 yuan in renovation subsidy. After Dong paid Yang Moujiang 220,000 yuan, the remaining 130,000 yuan was divided between the two defendants, with Dong receiving 32,500 yuan and Luo receiving 97,500 yuan.

After discovering the situation, the person in charge of Jinyuan Company reported the case to the Public Security Bureau of a certain county in Songtao. Following a summons by phone from the public security authorities, defendants Dong and Luo truthfully confessed to their criminal activities and returned the illegal proceeds of 130,000 yuan to Jin Company.


The prosecution alleges that between September 21, 2020, and September 24, 2020, an individual named Ma in a certain township was defrauded of 145,500 yuan through order-brushing on an online platform. During this period, Ma transferred 18,561 yuan to the account of Gao, 30,979 yuan to Wang's account, and 49,670 yuan to Liu's account. In September 2020, the defendant Gao met a person through QQ and, knowing that the person intended to use bank cards for gambling activities, still sold three sets of bank cards he registered to the person at a price of 1,000 yuan per set. He sent the bank cards and other items to the person by mail. Gao's bank card number 62×××73 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 228,626 yuan being investigated. In September 2020, the defendant Wang, introduced by a friend Feng, sold his three sets of bank cards to another individual for similar gambling activities, knowing the intended use, at 1,000 yuan per set. Wang also mailed the bank cards and other items, making a profit of 2,000 yuan. Wang's bank card number 62×××72 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 247,297 yuan being investigated. In August and September 2020, through a friend called "A," the defendant Liu was introduced to "Jia." Despite knowing that the person intended to use the bank card for illegal activities, Liu sold a set of his registered bank cards to the person for 2,000 yuan. After being informed by "Jia" that the bank card was locked, Liu went to the service hall to report it lost, got a replacement card, withdrew 11,458 yuan from it, and split the amount with "Jia," making a profit of about 7,700 yuan. Liu's bank card number 62×××77 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 406,802 yuan being investigated.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that in August 2013, the defendant Huang rented a property on Longping East Road, Longcheng Street, Longgang District, and used it to operate a game room, open 24 hours a day. During this period, the defendant Huang placed four gambling machines in the game room for patrons to gamble. Defendants Ceng, Wang, and Zhang were recruited to be responsible for cashier and management duties. At around 22:00 on August 20, 2013, police officers from the Longgang Branch of the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau conducted a routine inspection at the location and discovered gamblers using the four gambling machines. Consequently, the four aforementioned defendants were apprehended on the spot, and four gambling machines, gambling funds totaling 40,830 RMB, and a set of credit tools were confiscated. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang, Wang, Ceng, and Zhang during the court proceedings. Furthermore, these facts were substantiated by physical evidence such as the gambling machines provided by the public prosecutor and verified by the court; documentary evidence including the account of the arrest, the Public Security administrative penalty decision, extraction records, witness testimonies from Chen and Bai, identification records, the four defendants' confessions and defenses at the Public Security office, as well as on-site investigation records and photographs, all sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: On November 4, 2014, at around 1 p.m., at the construction site of a highway in Xigong Village, a certain town in a certain county, Gui had a dispute with Bao and Yang, who were defendants and part of the highway construction team, due to issues related to construction vehicles compacting the road. Subsequently, a physical altercation ensued between the parties, during which Gui was injured by Yang and Bao. According to the forensic appraisal by Anhui Chaoyang Judicial Appraisal Institute, Gui's injuries were determined to constitute minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Bao and Yang compensated the victim with an economic loss amounting to 120,000 yuan, and the victim expressed understanding towards Bao and Yang. The public prosecution authority presented evidence to the court to support the aforementioned facts, which include: 1. The statement of the victim Gui; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Sheng; 3. Confessions of the defendants Bao and Yang; 4. Records of the scene investigation by a certain county's public security bureau and forensic investigation photos, as well as the process of bringing the suspects to justice; 5. The appraisal opinion of Anhui Chaoyang Judicial Appraisal Institute, household registration certificate, and other evidence. Consequently,


Upon trial, it was found that from December 2014 to July 2015, the defendant Wu, at his own home in a village in a certain town of a certain county, used "underground Mark Six" lottery to write bets on behalf of his superior, the defendant Zhou. He received bets amounting to 90,000 yuan from Liu, 9,000 yuan from Peng, and 24,145 yuan from Liang. The defendant Wu reported the total amount of these bets, 123,145 yuan, to the defendant Zhou. The defendant Zhou, at his own home in Yanpo Group of the same village, engaged in "underground Mark Six" lottery as well, and received a total of 123,145 yuan in bets from his subordinate, the defendant Wu. On July 23, 2015, police officers summoned the defendant Wu. On October 20 of the same year, the defendant Zhou surrendered at the Lukou police station. It was also found that the defendant Zhou was subjected to ten days of administrative detention and fined 2,000 yuan by the county's public security bureau on March 15, 2012, for participating in "underground Mark Six" gambling activities. After the case was uncovered, the police temporarily seized 5,000 yuan from the defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhou and Wu during the trial. These facts are corroborated by documents such as the account of the case development, the public security administrative penalty decision, admonition letter, registration form for fugitives, inspection transcripts, photo identifications, accounting records, list of seized items, call records, household registration information, testimonies from witnesses Liu, Peng, and Liang, as well as the defendants' confessions and defenses, and recognition transcripts, providing sufficient evidence for the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate charged: On May 12, 2014, the Qi County People's Court decided to judicially detain Jia for ten days. When the Judicial Police Brigade of the Qi County People's Court took Jia to Qi County Central Hospital for a pre-detention medical examination in accordance with the decision, Jia's relatives, Yang and another Yang, pulled and obstructed the process. After being advised to stop, one of the Yangs contacted her husband, Ren. Ren arrived at Qi County Central Hospital and assaulted Shi, a judicial police officer from the Qi County People's Court. Subsequently, Ren colluded with the defendants Yang and Ren to come to Qi County Central Hospital. Despite being stopped by on-site police officers, the two used violence against Song, a judicial police officer from the Qi County People's Court, who was performing his duties, thereby obstructing law enforcement, before fleeing by car. A forensic examination determined that the injuries to Song and Shi were minor.


Upon trial, it was found: 1. At approximately 16:30 on November 1, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wang Jia from under the Yanchun Building shopping mall in Renqiu City. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,267 RMB. After the incident, the electric bicycle was lawfully seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Wang Jia. 2. Around 10:00 on November 8, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wang Yi from under the Yuanping Shopping Mall in Renqiu City. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,333 RMB. On March 3, 2016, the two defendants compensated the victim Wang Yi with 2,300 RMB in cash, and Wang Yi expressed understanding of their actions. 3. At noon on November 10, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wu from under the Leisha Shopping Mall in Renqiu City and were caught on the spot by plainclothes team police officers from Renqiu City's Public Security Bureau. This electric bicycle was already returned to the victim Wu. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,236 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not objected to by defendants Li and Fu during the trial process and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Wu, sketches and photos of the theft scenes, the price verification conclusion from the Renqiu City Price Verification Center for Involved Items, identification records and photos, the arrest report provided by the Criminal Investigation Brigade of Renqiu City's Public Security Bureau, the arrest report provided by the Anti-theft Unit of the Renqiu City Public Security Bureau Criminal Police Brigade, and the household registration certificate letters of the two defendants, all sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of January 22, 2013, at around 7 p.m., the defendants Wang and Shu were assigned by the leadership of the Yicheng City Detention Center to be on duty at the Yicheng City People's Hospital to guard the detained individual, Zou. The guard duty was from 8:00 p.m. on January 22, 2013, until 8:00 a.m. on January 23, 2013. At around 10 p.m. on the 22nd, the detainee, Zou, requested to use the bathroom. Wang handed the key to the leg irons, which he was keeping, to Shu. Shu unlocked Zou's leg irons, and after Zou finished using the bathroom, Shu put the leg irons back on him. After that, the two sat nearby to guard Zou until around midnight, when Wang and Shu both fell asleep. At 2:33 a.m. on the 23rd, Zou took the opportunity while Wang and Shu were asleep to slip off the leg irons and escape from his hospital bed to outside the hospital. It wasn't until 10:47 a.m. on January 25, 2013, that Yicheng City Public Security Bureau patrol officers apprehended Zou and took him back into custody.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on June 6, 2016, at 21:00, at the chemical park railway bridge in Yimatu Town, Fumeng County, defendants Bai and Wang got into a fight with the victim, Zhang, due to an argument. During the altercation, defendants Bai and Wang injured the victim Zhang, resulting in Zhang being hospitalized at Fuxin Mining (Group) Ping'an Hospital. The hospital diagnosed him with: closed cranial brain injury, fracture of the right orbital inner wall, traumatic loosening of multiple teeth, loss of one tooth, fracture of the right frontal process of the maxilla, and fracture of the left nasal bone. On July 26, 2016, the Fuxin Fangzheng Forensic Appraisal Institute assessed that Zhang's injuries included: 1. Fractures of the nasal bone and right frontal process of the maxilla, which, according to Article 5.2.4.o of the "Standards for Identification of Human Injury Severity," were classified as minor injury of the second degree; 2. Fracture of the right inner orbital wall, which was classified as a minor injury according to Article 5.2.4.d of the same standards; 3. Loss of tooth in the lower jaw, post-injury consultation records showing right lower 1 tooth missing, left lower 1 tooth with grade II mobility, and post-injury consultation records 7 days later showing left lower 1 tooth had fallen out on its own, which according to Article 5.2.5.j of the said standards, constituted a minor injury. On August 26, 2016, defendant Bai was summoned to the case by Yimatu Police Station of Fumeng County Public Security Bureau. On March 5, 2017, defendant Wang was also summoned to the case by the Yimatu Police Station of Fumeng County Public Security Bureau.


The prosecution agency charges that on a night in June or July 2016, defendant Tian went to a certain village in a town of this city, at a certain number on Huá Níng Road by the roadside, and, by opening car doors, stole 10 yuan from a Land Rover SUV parked by Jiang. He then fled the scene. On a night in September 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a certain village on a street of this city, to the entrance of Du's house, and, by opening car doors, stole over 20 yuan from a van with the license plate G××××× parked by Qian, then fled the scene. On another night in September 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a playground in a certain village of this town, and, using the door-opening method, stole over 20 yuan from a black Chevrolet sedan, and then from another sedan with the license plate G××××× parked by Ma, they stole over 10 yuan, later fleeing the scene. On the early morning of September 22, 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a certain village on a street of this city and, by opening car doors, stole over 500 yuan, one Samsung S6 phone worth 2160 yuan, and a pack of Zhonghua soft-shell cigarettes worth 65 yuan from a Mercedes-Benz sedan with license plate G××××× parked by Wu at the roadside. These facts were not contested by defendants Tian and Bai during the trial. They are corroborated by the statements of victims Wu, Qian, and Ma, identification records and photos made by the public security organ, video surveillance footage, the administrative penalty decision by the Dongyang Public Security Bureau, situational explanations provided by police officers, the account of the capture process, and household registration certificates of defendants Tian and Bai, which are sufficient to establish the offense.


The prosecution charges: On the evening of August 21, 2015, at around 7 PM, the defendant Tuo, along with the defendant A, was near the overpass south of the Memorial Tower at Bayi Square in Nanchang City. A was responsible for covering, while Tuo carried out the pickpocketing, stealing a white vivo phone (valued at 860 RMB according to the appraisal) from the victim, Hu's, backpack. After the theft, the two sold the phone for 100 RMB, and they used the proceeds together. Later, Zhang, who purchased the phone, handed it over to the police; the police confiscated the phone and returned it to Hu. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Tuo and A during the court hearing. There is also corroborative evidence such as a small card with a phone number; photos of the stolen item and the crime scene; arrest details, explanatory notes, seizure warrant, and seizure list issued by the public security bureau; records of permanent residents, criminal judgment; victim Hu's report and statement; testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Xu; inspection transcripts; extraction records and photos; surveillance video and screenshots; appraisal conclusion on the value; confessions of defendants Tuo and A along with synchronous audio-visual recordings; and identification transcripts and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that on October 7, 2014, the defendants Zhang and Lv rode a motorcycle and followed a motor tricycle driven by Yue and stopped on a section of road from Xuzhou Tongshan District Daxu Town Agricultural Bank to a village in Jiawang District, Route 252. Taking advantage of the moment when Yue and his wife Dai were not paying attention, they stole 30,000 yuan in cash from the front passenger seat of the tricycle parked on the roadside. After the incident, the defendant Lv returned part of the stolen money. The defendants Zhang and Lv raised no objections during the court hearing process, and the aforementioned facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Yue and Dai, identification records and photographs, crime resolution report, arrest process documentation, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.