The prosecution alleges that, from the end of 2011 to the beginning of 2012, defendants Zhao and Chen, while being aware that the plastic particles and plastic films from Yang and others (all handled in separate cases) were stolen, repeatedly purchased them at prices lower than the market value and then resold them for profit, with the amount involved totaling 88,325 RMB. The specific criminal facts are as follows: 1. Around December 25, 2011, defendant Zhao, in collaboration with defendant Chen, purchased over 200 kilograms of plastic film from Yang and others, which was appraised at a value of 2,800 RMB, and then resold for profit. 2. Around January 15, 2012, defendant Zhao, together with defendant Chen, acquired more than 60 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were appraised at a value of 16,500 RMB, and then sold for profit. 3. Around January 30, 2012, defendant Zhao and defendant Chen bought over 20 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were appraised at a value of 5,500 RMB, and then resold for profit. 4. Around March 7, 2012, defendant Zhao and defendant Chen obtained 231 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were valued at 63,525 RMB by appraisal, and then resold for profit. On November 21, 2013, defendants Zhao and Chen voluntarily returned the illicit gains amounting to 88,325 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the seizure list, the process of how the case was brought to light, the criminal judgment, testimonies from witness Yang, statements from victims Qi, Dong, Luo, and Ni, confessions and defenses from defendants Zhao and Chen, appraisal conclusion from the price certification center of the city where the items involved were located, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that: On July 19, 2013, at approximately 8:40 PM, defendants Ren, Liang, and Jin went to the vacant lot opposite “Huamei Home Textiles” on a certain road in Xinqiao Street, a certain district, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Liu's unawareness, they snatched the gold necklace from his neck (appraised at 2,306 yuan) and fled the scene. On July 21, 2013, at around 7:00 PM, defendants Ren, Liang, and Gui went to the entrance of the Bank of China on Jinhong West Street, Xinqiao Street, a certain district, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Sun's unawareness, they snatched the gold necklace from his neck (appraised at 2,511 yuan) and fled the scene. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Ren, Liang, Gui, and Jin during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by the statements of victims Liu and Sun, the testimony of witness Dai, identification records, price appraisal reports, invoices, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release upon completion of sentence, records of capture, identification materials, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to confirm these facts.


The prosecution alleges: Defendants Zhang and Chen participated in a theft gang organized by Zhang (still at large) and Wang (still at large), among others, to conspire to steal crude oil from an oil field. On July 5, 2016, at about 10:00 am, defendants Zhang and Chen, along with others, drove a car to a hotel in the county for accommodation. During this time, Chen, Zhang, Wang, and Wang went to a certain town and around 10:00 pm on the same day, drove a micro freight vehicle and a van to park them inside the county government compound. On July 6, at about 9:00 am, Zhang, Zhang, Chen, Li, and Wang drove to inspect and scout the area near an oil well in a village, while Wang went to contact and guide a large truck. At around 7:00 pm, Zhang drove a car carrying Zhang, Wang, Chen, and Li, and Wang drove in a green modified truck to the vicinity of the oil well. At around 10:00 pm, Zhang, Zhang, Wang, Chen, Li, Wang, alongside two drivers of the truck, carried out the theft by using their own oil pipes to connect to the production valve of the oil well, transferring the crude oil into the tank of the modified truck. After about two hours, when the tank was filled with crude oil, defendants Zhang and others fled the scene by car. While escaping, they spotted a patrolling police car, leading the defendants to abandon the car and the modified truck and flee. According to identification, the stolen crude oil amounted to a total of 23.12 tons, valued at 24,797 yuan. On July 21 of the same year, defendant Zhang was captured by public security organs, and on July 22, defendant Chen was also captured. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the court trial, and there are confessions and defenses from defendants Zhang and Chen, testimonies from witnesses Han, Liu, Wu, Wu, Yu, Chen, Xie, and Cui, a pricing conclusion report of items involved in the case, vehicle sale agreements, car rental contracts, records of arrest and seizure, photos of seized items, inquiries into vehicle and personnel information, criminal judgment documents, records of unlawful and criminal history inquiries, synchronized audio and video recordings of interrogations, household registration information, and other evidence, all sufficient for determination.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that in October 2015, the defendant Lin set up a micro-cosmetic studio in Room 605, Building 22, Maanchi New Village, in this district, offering beauty services such as wrinkle removal, face slimming, and fat dissolving. The defendant Zheng assisted in introducing and contacting customers and received a commission. On October 19 of the same year, the defendant Lin used numbing cream and Botox to inject customer Zhou for wrinkle removal and later collected 1,500 yuan (RMB, the same hereinafter), giving a referral fee of 300 yuan to the defendant Zheng. On October 28 of the same year, the defendant Lin used numbing cream and muscle inhibitors to inject customer Jiang for chin fat dissolving and later collected 1,500 yuan, giving a referral fee of 300 yuan to the defendant Zheng. At about 18:00 on October 29 of the same year, public security personnel inspected the above-mentioned studio and seized eight bottles of muscle inhibitors and one bottle of J-CAIN (numbing cream) on site. According to the determination of the Wenzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration, the external packaging of the seized drugs did not indicate the drug registration number, and all should be treated as fake drugs. It was also found that the defendant Lin was pregnant at the time of the trial; the defendant Zheng had suffered a miscarriage at the time of the trial. On April 22, 2016, the defendants Lin and Zheng respectively returned illegal proceeds of 2,400 yuan and 600 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court hearing, and are substantiated by evidence such as muscle inhibitors, numbing cream, medicine instructions, photos of the medicines, the seizure list, identity documents, testimonies of witnesses Zhou and Jiang, the process of turning themselves in, the Wenzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration's drug determination document, the search record, the venue identification record, and the personnel identification record, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from early November 2018 to November 14, 2018, the defendant Sha, while guarding a courtyard in a certain district of a certain town where the victim Li and others stored items, took advantage of being alone to conspire with defendant Pan to steal twice the "Jiangxi Jiangte" brand (YZTD200L3-4/8/24) three-phase asynchronous electric motors, one "Certain Place Weifang" brand (YD160L-8/4) three-phase asynchronous electric motor, one "Mudanjiang" tower crane (QTZ40) tower hook, and four lift attachments (SC200/200) from the courtyard on four separate occasions. After Pan sold the stolen goods, Sha received more than 1,700 yuan, and Pan received more than 1,000 yuan. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Office of the Development and Reform Commission of a certain district, the stolen goods were valued at 11,299 yuan. On March 28, 2019, Pan turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of a certain district. On November 17, 2020, Sha and Pan compensated Li 12,000 yuan and received his forgiveness. Defendants Sha and Pan had no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations and signed a statement to that effect, and they also had no objections during the trial.


Upon trial, it was found that the defendant, Yan, was married to Jiao on September 23, 2000. The defendant, Zhuo, and Zhang held a wedding ceremony and began living together in 2009, eventually having a daughter. In 2013, defendants Yan and Zhuo became acquainted, fully aware of each other's marital status. From November 2013 until the discovery of the case, Yan and Zhuo lived together as a couple in two rented houses located in different villages in a certain town and district. During this period, on January 6, 2015, Zhuo gave birth to a baby boy at Zong Village Health Center, Xiaoji Town, a district. Yan and Zhuo were listed as the father and mother respectively on the baby's birth medical certificate. After the case came to light, Yan and Zhuo voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on December 31, 2015, and truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yan and Zhuo during the trial; they pleaded guilty voluntarily. The evidence presented includes testimonies from witnesses Ling, Xu, Li, Liu, and Wang provided by the prosecution; a statement from the victim, Jiao; the confessions and defenses of defendants Yan and Zhuo; two birth medical certificates; copies of marriage registration certificates; details of how the case was uncovered; and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.


The People's Procuratorate of Jiangdu District in a certain city of Jiangsu Province charges: Around midnight on February 3, 2016, defendants He and Han and victim Xia were drinking at the "Mountain City Grilled Fish Restaurant" in the Commercial City of Xianü Town, Jiangdu District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province. Defendant Han had an argument and scuffle with victim Xia. Defendant Han, holding a stool, and defendant He, holding an empty beer bottle, jointly assaulted victim Xia, causing injuries to Xia. According to the evaluation, victim Xia's bilateral nasal bone fractures were classified as minor injury of the second degree; the contusion of the scalp on the right occipital region and contusion of the soft tissue around the left eye were classified as minor injuries. After being brought to justice, defendant He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts; on February 3, 2016, defendant Han, after being notified by police over the phone, voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, defendants He and Han reached and fulfilled an agreement on civil compensation with victim Xia, obtaining Xia's understanding. The above facts are not disputed by defendants He and Han during the court hearing and are supported by the statement records of victim Xia provided by the public prosecution agency in court; testimonies from witnesses Qi, Zhang, Deng, who did not appear in court; the confessions and defenses of defendants He and Han; identification records; forensic clinical evaluation report issued by the Judicial Appraisal Institute of the Jiangdu District People's Hospital in a certain city; mediation records, mediation agreement, and receipts; the circumstances of the arrest; and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 4 a.m. on January 6, 2014, after prior discussion, the defendants Zhou and Peng rode a moped driven by Peng to the sidewalk near the entrance of a certain street number in this city. Zhou used a lock-picking key to pry open the lock of the car parked by the victim Ruan at that location, with the license plate number XXDT** of a certain place. The two stole a Nokia Lumia 800 mobile phone (worth 678 RMB), 800 RMB in cash, and six bottles of Junling Tianxia business wine from the car interior and trunk before fleeing. Subsequently, Peng sold five of the stolen bottles of Junling Tianxia business wine to others and hid one 100ML bottle of Junling Tianxia business wine (worth 73 RMB) at home. After the defendants Zhou and Peng were apprehended, both truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. The public prosecution agency determined that the actions of the defendants Zhou and Peng violated Articles x and x of the "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" and they should be held criminally responsible for joint crimes under the charge of x. The defendants Zhou and Peng both truthfully confessed their crimes, and according to Article x of the "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China," they may be given lenient punishment. It is recommended that both defendants be sentenced to less than ten months of imprisonment and fined. We hereby request legal judgment. The facts ascertained by our court through trial are the same as those charged by the public prosecution agency, and are supported by the following evidence: the victim Ruan's statement record, search record, list of seized items, list of extracted evidence, photos of stolen goods, invoices, vehicle information, surveillance video, price appraisal conclusion from the Shanghai Xuhui District Price Bureau, criminal judgment, decision of re-education through labor, certificate of release from re-education through labor, receipt of case report from Shanghai Public Security Bureau, case registration form, work situation, and the confessions of the defendants Zhou and Peng. This evidence has all been verified in court and is confirmed by our court.


Upon trial, it was found that on September 5, 2013, the Wuxing District People's Court of a certain city rendered Civil Judgment No. 484 (2013) of a certain place, ordering Fei Xin, Zhang, and the defendants Qiu, Chen to jointly repay the principal, interest, and penalty interest of a loan totaling 644,274.42 yuan to the City Branch of the Bank of China Limited. It was determined that the City Branch of the Bank of China Limited shall have the right to preferential satisfaction from the proceeds of the mortgage, auction, or sale of the property owned by Qiu, Chen, located at Unit 405, Building 183, Bibo Park, Bilanghu Community, in a certain city, according to the order of mortgage registration. After the judgment came into effect, the case entered the enforcement procedure. Despite multiple requests from the Wuxing District People's Court of a certain city, based on Civil Judgment No. 484 (2013), for the two defendants to vacate Unit 405, Building 183, Bibo Park in this city, they refused to vacate the property. Subsequently, on May 8, 2014, the Wuxing District People's Court posted a notice at the door and hallway of the unit, requiring Qiu, Chen and their family to move out by November 8, 2014. As of the expiration date, Qiu and Chen, without legitimate reasons, still refused to vacate, resulting in the inability to enforce the court judgment. After the incident, Qiu and Chen fulfilled all their enforcement obligations. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by Qiu and Chen during the court hearing, and are supported by evidence such as basic information of permanent residents, investigation request to public security organs, enforcement status report, civil judgment, court announcement, case filing and management information form, application for compulsory enforcement, validity certificate of legal documents, case receipt notice, bulk registered mail list, enforcement notice, asset report order, civil ruling, enforcement ruling, notice board of the property in question, business license, marriage certificate, assistance enforcement notice, land registration inquiry results, basic information of the property certificate, and case closure certificate; as well as the arrest report issued by public security investigators, and the confessions and defenses of Qiu and Chen. This evidence sufficiently establishes the findings.


Upon examination, it was ascertained that:

1. On the evening of November 26, 2014, defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu conspired in advance. Defendants Tao and Wu stole the "Zhepinghu 00901" ship, rented by Xuzhou Ronghe Construction Installation Engineering Co., Ltd., from the Taizhou Port dock site and sailed to the vicinity of the ancient Majiang River estuary. There, they met defendant Xu, who arrived by agreement on a small boat. Using manual labor and a crane, they stole 1.5 tons of channel steel and 2.05 tons of steel bars used for securing the channel steel from the "Zhepinghu 00901" ship, with a total value of 5,925 RMB.

2. At around 1 a.m. on January 18, 2015, defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu conspired in advance near the ancient Majiang River estuary and stole 2.35 tons of channel steel and 2.1 tons of steel bars using the aforementioned methods, with a total value of 7,170 RMB. On January 19, 2015, defendants Tao and Wu were apprehended by the police. On the same day, defendant Xu turned himself in to the authorities. After the incident, defendants Tao and Wu returned 9,500 RMB in stolen funds, and defendant Xu returned 3,595 RMB in stolen funds.

These facts, which defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu did not dispute during the trial, are corroborated by witness testimonies from Du, Wang, Xu, Han, Huang, Xu (another person), identification records, weighbridge receipts, call logs, seizure orders, seizure lists, photographs, situation reports, appraisal opinions on item prices, case findings, and basic information on permanent residents, which are sufficient for an affirmation.


After examination, it was found that at around 3 PM on May 4, 2013, Zhang and others had a dispute with someone over gambling near No. 68 Duxi Road, Duqiao Town, a certain city. During the escape, defendant Pan grabbed Zhang from behind and slammed him head-first into the ground. Subsequently, Yang and others used a plastic stool to beat Zhang, causing him injuries. According to the assessment, the victim Zhang suffered an epidural hematoma on the left occipital region without obvious neurological symptoms and signs; back injury resulted in fractures of the T8 and T10-12 vertebrae; the injuries to the left occipital region and back both constituted minor injuries. On May 7, 2013, the defendant Yang was arrested by the police. On June 8, 2013, the defendant Pan voluntarily turned himself in at the public security institution and truthfully confessed his crime. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Pan reached a mediation agreement with the victim Zhang, compensated Zhang's economic losses, and obtained Zhang's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by documentary evidence including the two defendants' household registration certificates, case handling records, criminal judgment, public security administrative penalty decision, withdrawal of public security administrative penalty, people's mediation agreement, receipt, letter of forgiveness, investigation notes, statement of circumstances, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Bao XX, Wang A, and others, victim Zhang's statement, identification record, forensic medical injury evaluation certificate, on-site inspection records, site map and photos, audiovisual materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm.


A local People's Procuratorate accused the defendant Ye of knowing on June 10, 2013, that Zhu (already sentenced) intended to seek revenge after a conflict over trivial matters, yet still actively contacted the defendant Jiang, who then contacted Yang (handled in a separate case) to gather people. At 4:30 am that day, the individuals gathered by Yang followed Zhu and others into Shunyun Restaurant at XXX, Jiangning Road, in the city. Under Zhu's instruction, Yang and others used beer bottles and chairs to assault the victims Bao, Zhang A, Lu, Zhang B, and others, and smashed a 46-inch Skyworth LCD TV in the store. According to the appraisal, Bao suffered facial soft tissue injuries from external force, resulting in minor injury; Zhang A suffered a scalp contusion, resulting in minor injury; Lu suffered a subscalp hematoma, resulting in minor injury; Zhang B suffered a subscalp hematoma, resulting in minor injury. The smashed Skyworth LCD TV was valued at 3,770 RMB. On September 19, 2013, the defendant Ye turned himself in to the public security authorities and later compensated the victim Bao. On February 24, 2014, the defendant Jiang was summoned to the case by the public security authority, and then Jiang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and are confirmed by the statements of victim Bao and others, the testimonies of witnesses Shao, Gong, Zhou, Xu, and others, the injury notification, judicial appraisal opinion, mediation agreement, and criminal understanding document, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that the defendants Chen and Wang were operating the "Du Yi Wei" fried dough shop in a town of a certain district in a certain city. They became dissatisfied because a peer, Zhang, had asked their landlord about rental prices and subsequently opened a shop with the same name near the "Du Yi Wei" fried dough shop operated by Wang's brother, X, in a village of the same town. The defendants Chen and Wang, feeling aggrieved, then plotted with Chen's brother-in-law, Gao (who is being dealt with in a separate case), to vandalize the shop to vent their anger. On June 3, 2015, at around 21:30, the defendant Chen, Gao, and others drove to the west side of Provincial Road 229 in the village of a certain town in a certain district where Zhang's "Du Yi Wei" fried dough shop is located. They used sticks to smash the shop's glass, air conditioning, and other items and assaulted Zhang and his family. After assessment, it was determined that the injuries of Zhang, Miao, and Qiao constituted minor injuries, and the total property damage was valued at 608 yuan. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wang during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of the victims Zhang, Miao, and Qiao, the on-site inspection records, identification records, expert opinions, medical certificates, related documentary evidence, household registration certificates, and records of their arrest, all sufficient to establish the facts.


A certain People's Procuratorate charges: On November 1, 2011, at approximately 17:00, drug purchaser Xu contacted the defendant Wei to agree on purchasing drugs from Wei at the price of 250 RMB per pack of "K powder," near Tianjun Building in Luohu District of this city. Defendant Wei then drove with defendant Zhao to the aforementioned location. Defendant Wei wrapped a pack of "K powder" in a transparent plastic bag with a tissue while in the car and handed it to defendant Zhao, instructing Zhao to call over drug purchaser Xu, who was waiting not far away. Defendant Zhao opened the passenger side window and gestured for drug purchaser Xu to come over. Xu handed 550 RMB to Zhao, stating that 300 RMB of it was previously owed to defendant Wei. Defendant Wei then instructed defendant Zhao to hand over the tissue-wrapped "K powder" to drug purchaser Xu. The transaction was completed and both parties were immediately apprehended by the police. Police officers seized 550 RMB and three small packages of suspected drugs wrapped in tissue from defendant Zhao (upon testing, one small package was a white crystal weighing 2.37 grams, detected as ketamine; the other two small packages were white solids weighing 0.34 grams and 0.36 grams, both detected as cocaine), and one pack of "K powder" purchased by Xu was seized from him (upon testing, weighing 1.6 grams, detected as ketamine). To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence, documents: inventory of seized items, photos of involved drugs and drug funds, drug receipt, arrest process, explanatory statement, call records, defendants' identity documents; 2. Witness testimony: testimony of witness Xu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Wei and Zhao; 4. Appraisal conclusion: inspection report from the Shenzhen Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center; 5. On-site investigation record and photos.


The prosecution alleges that on June 23, 2015, defendants Luo and Tan rented an apartment located in Doumen District, Zhuhai City, a province. In the early morning of August 5 and August 13, 2015, Luo and Tan allowed drug user Yuan (handled separately) to use methamphetamine (××) at the aforementioned residence. At around 16:00 on August 23, 2015, Luo and Tan allowed drug users Yuan, Jiang (handled separately), and "A" (identity unknown, at large) to use methamphetamine at the aforementioned residence. After using drugs, "A" left. Luo, Tan, Yuan, and Jiang were caught on the spot by police officers, who discovered a homemade drug-smoking tool, a bong, and a bag of methamphetamine (white crystalline, with a net weight of 0.77 grams). On-site testing showed that the urine samples of Luo, Tan, Yuan, and Jiang all tested positive for ×× (MET). These facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Tan during the trial, and are supported by evidence including the arrest process, residence information, case handling statement, administrative penalty decision, on-site testing report, copies of receipts and tenant registration form, photos of a rented house key, drug tool, and drugs involved in the case, seizure decision, search record, and inventory list, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Yuan, Jiang, and Huang, identification records of defendants Luo and Tan, on-site investigation record form, scene photos, and physicochemical test report, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused that on January 21, 2017, at around 8:00 AM, the defendant Shi urgently needed parts for a sponge cutting machine, so he contacted the defendant Li, an employee of Handan City Fuxing Shenjian Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. The two conspired to steal parts from the company. At about 8:00 PM that evening, the defendant Shi drove a Jetta car with the license plate D×××**, taking advantage of the absence of people, he and the defendant Li together stole the sponge cutting machine parts from the company's south and north workshops. After verification, the stolen parts included two lead screws, two pull rods, two cutting blocks, two belt pulleys, four couplings and guide wheels each, and six nylon rollers. According to the Handan City Fuxing District Price Evaluation Center, the stolen parts were valued at a total of 2,620 yuan. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusation.


The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province, charges that: On the evening of August 26, 2015, at about 9 PM, defendants Zhang and Gu, together with Mao (to be handled in a separate case) and others, were gambling with the victim Hong Cong at Blue Ocean Hotel in Haizhou District of a certain city. After losing money, Zhang and others suspected that the victim Hong Cong was cheating, and forcibly took him to room 710 of Qianfu Grand Hotel in Haizhou District. In the hotel room, defendants Zhang, Gu, Mao, and others verbally abused, beat, threatened the victim Hong Cong, and forced him to hand over more than 5,000 yuan. Subsequently, defendants Zhang, Mao, and Xu (to be handled in a separate case) took Hong Cong near a certain place in a certain district of the city due to his reporting to the police, and beat him with a belt. They released him at about 2 AM the next day. An assessment confirmed that the victim Hong Cong sustained multiple soft tissue injuries, classified as minor injuries. On August 31, 2015, defendant Zhang turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of Haizhou Branch in a certain city; On January 19, 2016, defendant Gu turned himself in to Donghai County Public Security Bureau. To substantiate its charges, the prosecution presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the defendants’ confessions to the court.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 6:00 PM on October 14, 2015, the defendant Yu sold suspected drugs, specifically five red pills known as "Magu," to the drug user Cheng at the entrance of Day Tai Li No. 4 in Erlongtan Park, Qianchuan region, for 300 yuan. On the same day, the defendants Yu and Peng sold another five suspected red pills, known as "Magu," to the drug user Cheng at the aforementioned location, also for 300 yuan. They were caught by police officers on the spot, who seized the five suspected pills Cheng had just purchased and another five he had bought previously from Yu. Additionally, 300 yuan of drug money was found on Peng. According to the appraisal by the Wuhan Public Security Bureau Drug Testing Center, the seized pills weighing 0.47 grams and 0.45 grams respectively were both identified as methamphetamine. The defendants Yu and Peng had no objection to the above facts during the trial. These facts are supported by evidence such as the seized drugs, the process of seizure, the list of confiscated items, the drug storage registration form, previous offense materials, witness Cheng’s testimony, the statements and defenses of defendants Yu and Peng, extraction records, identification records, and appraisal opinions, which are sufficient to be proven.


The prosecution alleges that on December 6, 2018, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Fu, Cao, Qi, Xu, and others were dining at the cafeteria of Linfeng Food Trading Co., Ltd. During this time, defendant Fu instigated defendants Cao, Qi, and Xu to vandalize the Zhenjiang Fenghuang Grain and Oil Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Fenghuang Grain and Oil), operated by Wei. At about 9:00 PM that night, defendant Cao drove Qi and Xu to Fenghuang Grain and Oil. After Qi and Xu climbed over the wall into the company, they used methods such as kicking and throwing bricks to vandalize the company's roller shutters and items inside the store. On their way past Zhenjiang Runxin Storage Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Runxin Storage), defendants Cao, Qi, Xu, and others used methods such as prying and throwing bricks to damage the company's electric gate, the windows and doors of the security room, and the rearview mirrors of vehicles in the yard. At around 11:00 PM that night, defendants Cao and Qi returned to Fenghuang Grain and Oil and continued to vandalize the company's items. According to the Zhenjiang Municipal Price Appraisal Center, the total price of the damages to Fenghuang Grain and Oil was 23,800 RMB, and the total price of the damages to Runxin Storage was 2,348 RMB. After the incident, defendants Fu and Qi voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. Defendants Cao and Xu truthfully confessed the facts after being brought to justice.


A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges: At approximately 3 a.m. on July 12, 2013, defendants Xiao and Xiang apprehended the victim Yang at the entrance of the fruit market on Chenzhou East Street in Yuanling Town, Yuanling County. The two defendants, one on the left and one on the right, abducted Yang into an alley behind Jianshe East Street. During this process, Xiao threatened Yang by brandishing a butterfly knife, while Xiang issued verbal threats, demanding Yang hand over the money on his person. The defendants Xiao and Xiang robbed 231.5 yuan in cash and a Guoxing mobile phone from Yang. The stolen money was squandered by the two on drug use. During the trial process of this case, defendant Xiao has compensated the victim Yang a total of 878.5 yuan, which includes the cash and the value of the phone. The public prosecution agency recommends that the court sentence defendants Xiao and Xiang to imprisonment ranging from three to four years, and impose a fine, based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants. Defendants Xiao and Xiang do not dispute the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution agency and have not raised any defensive opinion. Regarding the aforementioned charges, defendants Xiao and Xiang raised no objections during the court proceedings. Evidence provided included household registration certificates, on-site drug test results from urine samples, case registration forms, records of apprehension, inventory lists of seized items and documents, the criminal judgment (2001) Yuan Xing Chu Zi No. 169 from Yuanling County People's Court, the reeducation through labor decision (2007) No. 417 from Huaihua City Labor Reeducation Management Committee, and receipts; the victim Yang's statement; the confessions and defenses of defendants Xiao and Xiang; on-site inspection records and identification transcripts; as well as photographs of the crime scene and weapon—sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution alleges that in May 2014, Wang (handled in a separate case) instructed defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng to travel from a certain city in a certain province to another province to distribute fake lottery tickets used to commit fraud. Wang promised to provide daily operational funds and remuneration to the three individuals, and to distribute a bonus after the business succeeded. Following Wang's instructions, defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng successively retrieved mailed fake lottery tickets from a courier company in a certain district, a city, Haishi district in a certain city, and another city district. They graded the fake lottery tickets, each placed them in black travel bags, and then went out separately to distribute them along the streets in the city. In June of the same year, victims Wu and Li, after picking up the fake lottery tickets, were defrauded of a total of 19,390 yuan under the pretense of needing to pay taxes and notarization fees after winning. During the trial, the three defendants returned the illicit funds of 19,390 yuan involved in the case and obtained the victims' Wu and Li's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng during the court proceedings. Additionally, there is evidence to support these facts, including statements from victims Wu and Li, the registration form of the case, the account of the arrest, the seizure order, the inventory list, a set of photographs of physical evidence, a series of surveillance screenshot photos, a photocopy of the fake lottery ticket delivery receipt, proof of residence registration, and other supporting evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that between March 9 and March 18, 2014, the defendants Yao, Wu, and Li jointly operated a casino at Wu's home, located at No. 35 Wudu Wuxun Road, Songyuan Street, in a certain county. It was used for gambling in the form of "A8," from which they illicitly profited over 8,000 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on April 14 and 22, 2012, the defendant You, under the instigation of Sun (at large), conspired with others to steal a total of 90 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Zhejiang Dongbang Ship Repair and Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Dongbang Company), valued at 150,372 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Kailai Shipyard, after which he received a share of 100 RMB. During the period from January to February 2012, the defendant Li, under the instigation of Wu A (already sentenced), conspired with others on two occasions to steal a total of 72 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Dongbang Company, valued at 50,400 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Taiping Shipyard, after which he received a share of 300 RMB. During the period from September to October 2011, the defendant Wu, under the instigation of Wu A, conspired with others to steal a total of 31 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Dongbang Company, valued at 21,700 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Taiping Shipyard, after which he received a share of 80 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants You, Li, and Wu during the trial, and were confirmed by the confessions of accomplices Han, Jiang, Wu A, Li A, Zhuang, Jin, Fang, Xu, Zhang, and He, the testimonies of witnesses Hou, Ren, and Wang, the price certification conclusion, the identification record, search record, list of seized items, photos of stolen goods made by Daishan County Public Security Bureau, the explanation of the arrest process, the Criminal Judgment No. 117 (2012) of a certain Criminal Division of this court, and the household registration certificates of the defendants You, Li, and Wu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District of a certain city charges: 1. On the night of December 27, 2014, the defendant Hao allowed defendants Fu, Weng, and drug users Xia and Hu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") in his rented apartment at Room 205, Building 21, "Binhe Garden," Kexiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. 2. In the early morning of December 28, 2014, the defendant Fu allowed the defendant Weng and drug users Xia and Hu to use methamphetamine in his rented apartment at Room 203, Building 11, "Xinjiang New Village," Keqiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. 3. On the night of December 30, 2014, the defendant Weng allowed defendant Fu and drug users Hu and Huang to use methamphetamine in Room 833 at the "Loushanglou Hotel" where he was staying, located on Keqiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Hao, Fu, and Weng during the court trial, and are evidenced by the house rental contracts, rental agreements, accommodation registration information, business licenses, explanatory notes, the process of apprehension, testimonies of Hu, Huang, Xia, Yu, and Zhou, as well as on-site test reports, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On September 13, 2016, defendant Ding, without obtaining a felling permit, sold 12 poplar trees planted in Team A of the Xiangyang Community in a certain town of a certain city to defendant Ma. Defendant Ma, also without obtaining a felling permit, arbitrarily cut down the aforementioned trees, with a standing timber volume of 10.0713 cubic meters. The charge asserts: Defendants Ding and Ma violated national forest protection regulations by arbitrarily cutting down trees in significant quantity without the approval and felling permit issued by the forestry administrative authorities or other authorized departments stipulated by law. Their actions constituted a violation of Article x and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Defendants Ding and Ma raised no objection to the criminal facts and charges by the prosecution. After the trial, it was ascertained: On September 13, 2016, defendant Ding, without obtaining a felling permit, sold 12 poplar trees he planted in the Shantang area and the eastern section of Longgou area in Team A of the Xiangyang Community, in a certain town of a certain city, to defendant Ma. Defendant Ma also without a felling permit, arbitrarily cut down the aforementioned trees. According to the appraisal by the Forestry Survey and Design Office of a certain city, the standing timber volume of the aforementioned felled Poplar B trees was 10.0713 cubic meters. On October 11 and 12, 2016, defendants Ma and Ding respectively voluntarily surrendered to the Forest Police Station of the Forest Public Security Bureau in a certain city and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. During the trial, defendants Ding and Ma also did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Feng, Luo, Geng, Wang, Fang, and Chen, the on-site inspection record, location diagram, on-site inspection photos, standard measurement calculation form, inspection location map, forest ownership certificate, a certain City Forestry Bureau certificate, appraisal opinion No. 9 (2016) by the Forestry Survey and Planning Design Office of a certain city, case registration form, the account of defendants Ding and Ma coming to the case, criminal record investigation materials, identification transcripts and photos of defendants Ding and Ma, confessions and defenses, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the judgment.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 11 p.m. on December 27, 1999, defendants Zheng and Shao, along with friends Lang and Dai, went to a "special flavor skewer shop" near a company in a certain city to eat skewers. During this time, Zheng accidentally bumped into the arm of the victim Wang1 while going to the bathroom, leading to a quarrel between them. Subsequently, Zheng, in conjunction with Shao and Dai, assaulted Wang1 with punches and kicks within the company courtyard. Li, a friend of Wang1 who was with them, saw this and attempted to help Wang1. Seeing this, Lang stopped Li and restrained him, preventing him from going to Wang1's aid. After Wang1 fled from the beating, Zheng instructed Shao to chase and continue hitting Wang1. Outside the company, Shao caught up with Wang1, pulled him to the ground, and punched Wang1 in the head. According to the appraisal by the forensic identification center of the city's public security, the damage to Wang1's left occipital area, caused by a blunt object leading to a rupture of the dura mater, was assessed as serious injury. After the incident, defendant Zheng was summoned to the case, and defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered. To prove the aforementioned criminal facts, the prosecution questioned the defendants in court, read out the confessions of defendants Zheng and Shao made during the investigation, the statement of the victim Wang1, the testimonies of witnesses Lang, Dai, Wang2, and others, and presented doc


Upon review, it was found that on July 17, 2014, at approximately 13:00, defendants Li and Yu were drinking at the "Yuhua Lamb Restaurant" in a certain village of Dongcheng Street, Linqu County. Defendant Li, due to a trivial matter, smashed some beer bottles inside the restaurant and broke the glass on the right side of the restaurant's door. When police officers from the Dongcheng Police Station, Linqu County Public Security Bureau, arrived on the scene following a 110 command, defendants Li and Yu injured police officer Liu and auxiliary officer Gao, who were performing their duties. Subsequently, an assessment determined that the injuries of both officers constituted minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Li and Yu compensated victims Liu and Gao for the economic losses caused by their injuries, as well as the economic losses of victim Zhang, and received the victims' forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and were supported by documentary evidence such as copies of people's police identifications, the Linqu County Public Security Bureau dispatch order, appraisal fee receipts, population information, phone records, the process of arrest, prior conviction records, letters of forgiveness, witness testimonies from individuals including Yang, statements from victims Zhang, Liu, and Gao, on-site inspection records and photos, and the minor injury assessment reports for victims Liu and Gao, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on November 17, 2015, the defendants Wei, Hu, Wu, Ding, and others assaulted the victim Huang at a certain company in Ailian, Longcheng Street, a certain district, a certain city. Huang was identified as having sustained minor injuries of the second degree.


After trial investigation, it has been found that starting mid-June 2015, the defendant Lou, at No. 61, a certain park in a certain town, illegally distributed and sold Mark Six lottery tickets for profit, organizing others to gamble on the lottery and taking an 11% commission from the bets. During this period, the defendant Lou accepted over thirty Mark Six lottery bets from the offender Chen, with a total bet amount exceeding 60,000 yuan. Lou reported this total amount to the defendant Zhang, who then reported more than 30,000 yuan of these bets to Geng (handled in a separate case). By the time the case was uncovered, the defendant Lou had earned over 600 yuan, and the defendant Zhang had earned more than 3,000 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Lou during the trial. They are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Chen, inspection records, call records, criminal judgment records of prior offenses, details of the arrest, the confessions of the defendants Zhang and Lou, and personal identification documents — sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At approximately 15:00 on October 8, 2014, the defendant Ben gathered defendants Su, Yang, and Ma in a district of a certain city in a certain province, and they rented a car with the license plate Lu Q×××××, driven by defendant Zhou. They went to a brick factory in Chenjia Village, a certain town in a certain city. They lured the factory's contractor Ji Mumu (also known as Chen Mouda) into the car, using the pretext that Ji Mumu had previously sold Ben, causing him losses that needed compensation. They threatened to report to the police or take Ji Mumu back to a certain place for handling. Through knife threats and physical assault, they extorted compensation of 60,000 RMB from Ji Mumu. At around 1:00 the next day, Ben, Su, Yang, Ma, and Zhou were arrested at a place on the highway at kilometer marker 470 while waiting to receive the compensation money. To support the charges for the above facts, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including case initiation and resolution records, the defendants' confessions and defenses, witness testimony, the victim's statement, relevant documentary evidence, physical evidence, and household registration certificates.


The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that starting from July 2014, the defendant He, in collaboration with the defendant Huang, began selling drugs in the vicinity of ** Street, ** New District in Zhongkai **. He purchased methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice") from Luo and delivered it, while Huang was responsible for finding supply sources and sometimes delivering with He. After purchasing drugs, He and Huang used some for their own consumption and sold some to individuals like Ling at prices ranging from 150 to 200 yuan, thereby making a profit. At around 22:00 on November 17, 2014, public security personnel apprehended He in the process of selling drugs on Yongning Street, Chenjiang, in the High-tech District of Zhongkai, and seized two packages of suspicious drugs on him (after testing, the total net weight was 1.93 grams, both containing methamphetamine). Subsequently, the police apprehended Huang at the Xingkai Traffic Police Team's Dormitory, room 505. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above facts.


Upon examination, it was found: 1. On the afternoon of December 25, 2015, the defendants Wu and Zhang, having premeditated, used sleight of hand to steal a coat valued at 2,988 RMB from the Metersbonwe counter on the second floor of a mall in Yangshe Town, a certain city. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. 2. On the afternoon of January 24, 2016, the defendants Wu and Zhang, after premeditating, attempted to commit theft at the Weiku counter on the second floor of the same mall in Yangshe Town, but failed as they were discovered. The defendants Wu and Zhang committed two acts of theft, with the goods valued at 2,988 RMB. After Wu was apprehended, he truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. Both defendants Wu and Zhang are hearing-impaired. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Wu and Zhang during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Tang, and Wang; identification records; photos; search records; seizure lists; return lists; evidence retrieval lists; purchase receipts; disability certificates; audiovisual material descriptions; surveillance footage; price verification reports; incident documentation; arrest records; the confessions of the defendants Wu and Zhang; the decision not to impose administrative penalties; population information; and basic permanent resident information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts, which this court confirms.


The prosecution alleges that starting in 2014, defendants Zhou and Su produced and sold bulk fish gelatin containing borax at stall number S143 located at 2546A, Shanzi Market, Chancheng District, in a certain city. On November 12, 2015, the Food and Drug Administration of Chancheng District conducted a sampling inspection of the bulk fish gelatin produced and sold at the aforementioned stall, finding a borax content of 877 mg/kg in the fish gelatin (the standard being non-detectable levels). On January 6, 2016, police summoned the two defendants to the public security bureau for investigation at the aforementioned stall. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Su during the court hearing, and were supported by the testimony of witness Chen, identification photographs, individual household business records, rental contract, Shanzi Market food and edible agricultural products safety operation responsibility documents, on-site inspection records provided by the Chancheng District Food and Drug Administration, national food safety sampling inspection forms, appraisal report, the process of arrest, search records, seizure list, business license, video materials, household registration certificates, as well as the confessions and identification photos of defendants Zhou and Su during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that around 11:00 a.m. on January 16, 2016, the defendant Li had a dispute over trivial matters with her sister-in-law, Yan, at the storefront XX, Building XX, Zhuchen Building Materials Market, Luozhuang District, Linyi City. Defendant Li called her niece, Wang, to the scene. Defendant Wang first pushed the victim, Yan, to the ground, after which Li kicked and punched Yan, resulting in soft tissue contusions on Yan's back and waist, and a fracture on the right side of the second lumbar vertebra. According to the assessment, the victim Yan's injuries were categorized as minor injuries, Grade 2. The prosecution submitted to the court evidence including the assessment opinion, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and statements from the victim Yan, as well as confessions from defendants Li and Wang.


The People's Procuratorate of a Certain Banner, Tumote Youqi charges: 1. In March 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han, in collusion with defendant Wang (the two are married), sold eight pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 1 at a price of over 400 yuan per pound. Yang 1 paid Han and Wang over 3000 yuan for the drugs. 2. In May 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han sold one pound of the drug Anarco to Yang 2 at a price of 600 yuan per pound. Yang 2 paid Han 600 yuan for the drugs. 3. On October 19, 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han, together with defendant Wang, sold ten pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 1. 4. On October 20, 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han sold eight pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 2 at a price of 600 yuan per pound. Yang 2 paid Han 4800 yuan for the drugs. The People's Procuratorate of a Certain Banner, Tumote Youqi, has submitted to this court the relevant evidence materials accusing defendants Han and Wang of committing the crime of X as follows: 1. Seizure list and list of seized items documents; 2. Seizure decision, proof of no criminal record, arrest process, explanatory note, household registration information, permanent resident information; 3. Witness testimony from Yang 1 and Yang 2; 4. Confessions and defenses of defendants Han and Wang; 5. Search, seizure, and identification records; 6. Physical and chemical examination report; 7. Nine CDs.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charged that, starting from May 2014, the defendant Luo rented the electrical machine room of the parking lot on the first floor of a certain hotel in this district through Zhang, the property manager of the hotel, to operate a gambling den using the "San Gong" poker game format. The defendant Xu was employed by Luo to collect "water money" at the gambling den, while the defendant Yang provided loans there. At approximately 3:30 a.m. on August 15, 2014, police officers conducted an inspection of the electrical machine room in the parking lot on the first floor of the hotel, arresting defendants Luo, Xu, and Yang at the scene, along with 22 gamblers including He Mohu. They seized gambling money amounting to 52,190 RMB, 1,000 HKD, and a set of poker cards used as gambling tools. Additionally, 3,000 RMB of "water money" collected that day was found on defendant Luo.


Upon trial, it was found that starting from December 2014, the defendant Yin was illegally receiving bets on underground lottery ("liuhecai") near the Martyr Cemetery and Huayuanjiang Community in Hecheng Street, a certain county, for over a month, approximately 10 sessions, totaling over 7,000 RMB. Beginning in February 2015, the defendant Yin, in conjunction with the defendant Zheng, illegally accepted other people's bets on the underground lottery. According to the arrangement, defendant Yin acted as the bookmaker, while defendant Zheng was responsible for collecting the bets in the storage room of his house or in nearby game rooms in Shengzhi Community, Building 2, Unit 1, Hecheng Street, a certain county. Defendant Zheng could take a commission of 4 RMB for every 100 RMB of bets collected. By May 19, 2015, when the public security authorities apprehended them, defendants Yin and Zheng had been accepting underground lottery bets for more than three months, covering about 40 sessions, and collecting a total of over 30,000 RMB. On May 19, 2015, defendant Zheng was apprehended by public security on the spot, and on June 30, 2015, defendant Yin turned himself in to the authorities. Both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal activities. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Zheng during the trial process. The facts have been substantiated by the evidence presented by the prosecution, which was verified and cross-examined during the trial. This includes the Decision on Evidence Preservation No. 127 [2015] by Qing Public Notary, 1,270 RMB in cash, 19 booklets of underground lottery promotional materials, one 2015 Zodiac Code table, two sheets of betting records, population information inquiry forms for defendants Yin and Zheng, administrative penalty decisions Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 10 [2015] by Qing Public Security in a certain location, receipts for fines and confiscations by a certain provincial agency in Zhejiang, documents detailing the arrest process, witness testimonies from Ye, Cheng, Luo, Wang, Tao, confessions and defenses by defendants Yin and Zheng, identification records, Inspection Certificate No. 64 [2015] by Qing Public Security, the inspection transcript, and on-site photographs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution alleges that from February to March 2016, the defendants Qian and Wang, along with Li A (separately prosecuted) and others, opened a casino in various towns of a certain county. They organized gambling activities using the "Four-Character Treasure" method to gather people for gambling, from which they collected profits. The defendants Qian and Wang collected more than 59,000 yuan in profits. The prosecution presented evidence including: household registration certificates, descriptions of how the defendants were brought to justice, receipts for returned illicit funds, testimonies from witnesses Li, Jin, Sun, Zheng, Li 2, Du, Li 3, Xu, Wang 2, Wang 3, Zhang, Chen, Li 4, Wang 4, Tang, as well as the confessions of the defendants Qian and Wang, and identification records.


After trial, it was found: On February 24, 2019, at around 9 PM, Yan (already sentenced) purchased drugs from the defendant Yang. The defendant Yang then contacted the defendant Bo to purchase drugs. Bo obtained approximately 0.8 grams of the drug methamphetamine ("ice") from another person and sold it to Yang for RMB 1200 in a certain district of a certain city. Yang then resold the aforementioned drugs to Yan for RMB 1400. These facts were not disputed by the defendant Yang during the court trial, and they are sufficiently proven by the testimonies of witnesses Yan and Liu, documentation provided by the public security authorities, evidence of arrest, identification records, identity information, the criminal judgment, and WeChat transfer record screenshots.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 14:00 on March 27, 2014, on the west side of Building 93 in Yuntao Community, Huantai County, the defendant Tian gathered defendants Shi and Zong to assault the victim Gao, who had come to help Zhou request repayment of a debt. Defendants Shi and Zong punched and kicked the victim Gao, resulting in injuries to Gao's head and face. According to the evaluation, the victim Gao's injuries were classified as minor injuries (Level 2). It was also found that defendants Shi, Zong, and Tian reached a civil settlement agreement with the victim and fulfilled their obligations under the agreement. The defendants raised no objections to the facts during the court trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Gao's statement; testimonies from witnesses such as Zhou; documentary evidence including household registration proof, case registration form, civil settlement agreement, and receipt; and the forensic medical evaluation report on the degree of bodily injury, which are sufficient for confirmation.


Upon examination, it was found that at around 18:00 on February 2, 2015, defendants Xu and Yu, a married couple, and victims Zhong A and Zhong B, another married couple, were setting up stalls to sell pancakes at the entrance of "Jiajiale Supermarket" in a certain city. A verbal dispute arose between the parties due to business competition, which led to a physical altercation. During the altercation, defendant Xu took a kitchen knife from their mobile cart and injured the head of victim Zhong B with it, after which she was pulled away. Defendant Yu, having been injured on his left brow arch by Zhong A who used tongs, then took a kitchen knife from their cart. Upon seeing this, Zhong A dropped the tongs and fled into the supermarket. Defendants Yu and Xu each wielded a kitchen knife and chased after him. Subsequently, at the entrance of the supermarket, both defendants injured Zhong A on the head and legs. After leaving the supermarket, the two defendants spotted victim Zhong B by the roadside, chased him, and inflicted injuries on his arm and other parts before leaving the scene. According to the forensic evaluation, both victims Zhong A and Zhong B suffered minor injuries of the second degree. Following the incident, defendants Yu and Xu were subsequently summoned by the public security authorities. During the trial, with the court's mediation, an agreement was reached between the parties regarding civil compensation. The defendants fully honored their compensation obligations, and both victims expressed understanding towards the defendants. Defendants Yu and Xu raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, pleaded guilty, and the evidence presented, including photos of the kitchen knives and other physical evidence, hospital records, accounts of the apprehension, household registration certificates, testimonies from witnesses Xie and Tong, statements from the two victims, confessions and defenses from the two defendants, forensic medical injury assessment reports, inspection and identification records, and audio-visual materials, all adequately prove the time, place, cause, method, harmful consequences, and subsequent actions of defendants Yu and Xu's intentional infliction of injury upon others. The relevant evidence materials, after being examined in court, were found to be objective and truthful, originated legally, and can be used as the basis for the verdict.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Starting from September 2015, defendants Liang and Li, in collusion with Li A (handled in a separate case), accepted bets on the "Mark Six" lottery at Room 205, No. 6 Xingye Street, Minzhong Town, Zhongshan City. Li was responsible for issuing receipts and collecting money from bettors, while Liang was responsible for accounting and compiling betting situations, and later transferring the bet funds to Li A. At about 8 PM on March 8, 2016, public security personnel apprehended Liang and Li at the aforementioned Room 205 and confiscated RMB 5,180, which was the amount bet that evening, as well as mobile phones and tickets used for betting on the "Mark Six" lottery. Subsequently, public security personnel seized lottery betting tickets, notebooks, and other items from Liang's residence at No. 18 Xiongdi Street, Minzhong Town. Upon evaluating the seized tickets, it was determined that Liang and Li had received a total bet amount of RMB 138,123 from others betting on the "Mark Six" lottery. After being brought to justice, Liang and Li truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The defendants Liang and Li raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court trial, and the facts are supported by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses of the defendants, examination records, inspection records, identification records, and audiovisual materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


According to the prosecution, on June 15, 2019, the defendant Zhang, under the subcontract of Gansu Debao Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., undertook the construction project of the Huimin Breeding Cooperative in Hanjiachao Village, a town in a certain county. The defendant Yang was the head of the Huining branch of Gansu Debao Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. At around 18:00 on July 2, 2019, defendant Zhang led workers to carry out construction at the site of the Huimin Breeding Cooperative in Hanjiachao Village, a town in a certain county. Due to the lack of on-site management personnel and absence of any safety precautions, earthwork was conducted on the outer side even though the silage pool wall had been laid but not yet cured or stabilized. This led to the collapse of the wall, burying workers such as Chai Moumou and Zhang A on the inner side, and injuring Xi Mou. Despite rescue efforts, Chai Moumou and Zhang A died.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Jiangsu Province charges: Defendants Xu and Qian conspired to illegally obtain electricity by modifying the electricity meter at Qian's residence located at No. 424, Group 2, Village XX, Chengxi Street, a certain district, a certain city. Defendant Xu provided Defendant Qian with the contact information of the personnel who would modify the meter. Subsequently, on November 15, 2012, Defendant Qian had the aforementioned personnel (identity unknown) modify the electricity meter at his residence and proceeded to steal electricity. According to the assessment, the error rate of the modified electricity meter was -91.758%. By September 10, 2019, Defendants Xu and Qian had stolen a total of 39,797.07 RMB in electricity fees through the aforementioned method. After being brought to justice, Defendant Qian fulfilled all restitution responsibilities. After committing the crime, Defendant Xu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to his crime.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province charged that on the evening of September 10, 2013, at around 6 PM, defendants Lv and Du purchased a large package of white crystalline powder for 1,000 RMB in a certain district of a certain city. At around 8 PM that evening, near the west gate of neighborhood 119 on Ganghua Village Street in the same district, defendants Lv and Du sold a small package of the white crystalline powder to an individual named Liu for 100 RMB. They were apprehended on the spot by police officers, and another large package of white crystalline powder was seized from defendant Lv. According to the appraisal, the small package of white crystalline powder sold was identified as the drug ketamine, with a net weight of 0.82 grams; the large package of white crystalline powder seized was also identified as the drug ketamine, with a net weight of 22.07 grams. All the aforementioned drugs were confiscated. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Lv and Du during the trial proceedings. Additionally, there is corroborating evidence, including the police agency's case-solving and arrest accounts, case handling statements, seizure decisions, seizure lists, and photographs, the narcotics handover registration form submitted by the provincial public security agency, identification materials of the defendants, witness testimony from Liu, and the drug test identification report issued by the Municipal Public Security Bureau's Drug Testing Center, all of which fully substantiate the case.


The prosecution charges that the defendant Liu, in order to recover a substantial debt from Wang Yib, which Wang Yib admitted amounted to 162,000 yuan owed to Liu, conspired with the defendant Wei and others on the afternoon of May 25, 2014, to detain Wang Yib from a train station in Hefei, a province, to his residence in a certain town. He was detained until around 7 p.m. the next day when he was sent back by others. During this period, the defendants Liu and Wei assaulted Wang Yib, causing rib fractures and superficial injuries, which were medically assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. On September 15, 2014, at around 12 p.m., the defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the Chahe Police Station of the Municipal Public Security Bureau. After being criminally detained, he proactively wrote letters encouraging his accomplices to surrender. On September 26 of the same year, the defendant Wei voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities after receiving Liu’s letter of persuasion. During the trial, the parties voluntarily reached a mediation agreement in which the defendant Liu agreed to forfeit all claims against Wang Yib and, together with Wei, compensated Wang Yib for various economic losses totaling 70,000 yuan. Wang Yib and his family forgave the actions of the defendants Liu, Wei, and others involved and waived their right to pursue criminal responsibility against them. During the trial proceedings, neither the defendants nor their defense lawyers contested the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. The defense argued that the defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered, truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime, amounting to voluntary surrender; after his return, he persuaded his accomplices to surrender, which demonstrates meritorious behavior. They suggested that the court should give a lenient punishment. These facts were also undisputed by the defendants Liu and Wei during the trial, and were substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Zu Mou, Wang Jia, Lu Moumou, Han Mou, among others, the victim Wang Yib's statement, identification records, defendant Liu’s letter persuading accomplices to surrender, the mediation agreement, the letter of forgiveness, receipts for compensation, evidence of the defendants' age of criminal responsibility, as well as the investigation and case handling process, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges that in December 2020, the defendants Wu and Xu, while working at Li's sand quarry in the Shibaozi development area of Huating City, discovered eight steel plates inside the factory building of Xinghua Smelting Company. After planning, the two stole the eight steel plates at around 1 a.m. on December 10. They rented a flatbed truck from Li to transport the stolen steel plates to Ma's scrap purchase station in a certain town of a certain city for sale. Ma paid Wu 11,000 yuan in cash. The Huating City Price Appraisal Center determined the value of the stolen steel plates to be 19,624 yuan. On December 25, 2020, Wang, a security guard at Xinghua Smelting Company, discovered the steel plates had been stolen and reported it to 110. During an inquiry, defendant Xu voluntarily confessed to the crime, and all the stolen steel plates were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: registration form for police case handling, seizure records and return list, receipts, explanatory notes, household registration certificate; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Wang, Li, Ma, Wu, another Wang, and another Li; 3. Statement from the victim, Zhu; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants; 5. Price determination certificate from the Huating City Price Appraisal Center; 6. On-site inspection records, identification records, extraction records, identification appraisal records, and photographs to substantiate the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that on May 10, 2019, at around 8:00 PM, after defendants Tian and He had been drinking with others, Defendant He, knowing that Defendant Tian had consumed alcohol, handed over the XXX Mitsubishi small ordinary passenger vehicle that He had driven to the location to Defendant Tian to drive. While traveling north along County Road 471 to the intersection of a village in a certain area, they were caught on the spot by traffic police. On May 12, 2019, it was determined by a judicial appraisal office in a certain city that Defendant Tian's blood alcohol concentration was 157.41 mg/100 ml, constituting driving under the influence of alcohol.


Upon investigation, it has been found that defendants Wu and Ji, during their subcontracting of the steel reinforcement works for the Jiangguang Expressway expansion project, believed that the project supervision by Jiangsu Runtong Project Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Runtong Company) deliberately made things difficult multiple times during the construction process. Therefore, at about 22:00 on January 19, 2016, they went to the supervisory office of the company located in a certain town, district, city, and had a verbal dispute with the supervisor in charge, Yang. Defendant Wu first splashed tea on Yang's face, then defendant Ji slapped Yang several times and held him down. Seizing the opportunity, defendant Wu approached and punched Yang on the head and face, and whipped him with a belt. During the assault on Yang, another project supervisor, Zhang, was also punched in the head and face by defendant Ji, and later whipped and beaten with a broom handle by defendant


The prosecution alleges that on the evening of October 27, 2013, defendants Zheng and Yang, among others, had a dispute with the victim Feng, which led to a fight. Later, Yang went to the Shilou County People's Hospital for bandaging due to injuries. At around 11 p.m. that same evening, Yang, Zheng, and others found Feng at Zhang’s tire repair shop, resulting in another dispute. Subsequently, Yang injured Feng's leg, while Zheng stabbed Feng in the left buttock and abdomen with a folding knife. According to the assessment by the Shilou County Public Security Forensic Identification Center, Feng's injuries were classified as serious.


The prosecution alleged that at around 7 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one gray-yellow dog belonging to Feng, weighing 15 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 120 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 9 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one brown dog belonging to Yang, weighing 26 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 208 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 9 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one black-yellow dog belonging to Wu, weighing 16 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 128 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 10 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one yellow dog belonging to Liu A, weighing 24 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 192 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. In support of the above allegations, the prosecution provided evidence including the confessions of the defendants Liu and Sun at the public security agency, the statements of the victims Feng, Yang, Wu, and Liu A, the testimony of witness Hao, the list of items seized and returned by the public security agency, the arrest process by the public security agency, the appraisal report on the value of the involved assets, the explanation of case handling by the public security bureau of a certain city, the defendants' household registration information, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.


After trial and verification, it was determined that around 3 PM on February 21, 2014, the defendants Zhan and Xiong were involved in a medical dispute with the Wuhan Huangpi District Maternal and Child Health Hospital due to the death of Zhan’s wife, Guo, after childbirth. Subsequently, they smashed property inside the hospital, including a "Lenovo" desktop monitor, a "Minolta 7616V" copier, wooden chairs in the conference room, wooden doors, guidance desks, newspaper racks, plastic-steel windows, and a health cabin. According to the appraisal by the Price Cost Investigation and Monitoring Sub-bureau of Wuhan Huangpi District, the value of the damaged items is estimated to be 6,036 RMB. After the incident, the defendant Zhan compensated the hospital for economic losses amounting to 2,000 RMB and received understanding. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhan and Xiong during the court hearings and were corroborated by the report materials from the Wuhan Huangpi District Maternal and Child Health Hospital and the testimony of Hospital Director Li; witness testimonies from individuals including Xiong Jia, Wu, Du, Liu, Li, Cheng, Xiao, Zhang, Liu Jia, Zhang Jia, Deng, Chen, and Qiu; proof materials from the public security organs, incident reports, arrest records, related surveillance photos and audio-visual materials, discs, case explanations; price appraisal conclusions by the Wuhan Huangpi District Price Bureau; mediation agreement, receipts, and letter of understanding; as well as confessions from defendants Zhan and Xiong. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: On the night of October 22, 2020, the defendants Wu and Lai, along with others, were eating and drinking at a farm in a village in a district of a certain city. Despite knowing that defendant Wu had consumed alcohol, defendant Lai still allowed Wu to drive a small car with the license plate B×××** registered under Lai's name. When Wu was driving this vehicle with Lai and others along Huanshi East Road, Jiangpu Street, in a district of the city, they were caught on the spot by the on-duty police officers. Upon examination, defendant Wu's blood alcohol content was found to be 143.9mg/100mL.


Upon examination, it was found that in February 2013, defendant Ke began illegally operating a lottery business and had defendant Pan introduce new clients to him. Defendant Pan introduced defendant Zhu to defendant Ke. Subsequently, defendant Zhu placed his own bets and those of others with defendant Ke. Defendant Ke returned 12% of the bet amount to defendant Zhu as commission, while defendant Zhu returned 10% of the bet amount to the bettors. Between April 4, 2013, and October of the same year, defendant Ke and defendant Zhu exchanged lottery gambling funds 13 times, 11 of which were through bank transfers, totaling 164,790 yuan. In October 2013, defendant Zhu accepted lottery bets for periods 120, 122, and 123 from Zhang, amounting to 26,700 yuan, over 5,000 yuan, and 3,810 yuan, respectively, and then relayed these bets to defendant Ke. On November 11, 2013, defendant Ke voluntarily went to the Lecheng Police Station of Yueqing Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. On April 3, 2014, defendant Pan assisted the public security organ in capturing Huang, a criminal suspect who was legally arrested for suspected environmental pollution crimes. It was also found that defendant Ke illegally obtained over 10,000 yuan, and defendant Zhu illegally obtained over 4,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Ke, Zhu, and Pan during the trial, and were corroborated by witness Zhang’s testimony, the capture process, identification transcripts, search records, a list of seized items, evidence preservation decisions, evidence preservation lists, betting lists, mobile text message betting lists, bank card transaction details, meritorious service materials, administrative penalty decisions, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient for determination.


After trial, it was found that around 14:00 on May 22, 2016, the defendants Jiang and Chen agreed to go fishing at the Guanhao waters in a village in a certain town of a certain city. Chen rowed the boat while Jiang operated the electric fishing gear and netted the fish at the bow. The two fished with electric gear for about half an hour along the watershed of the "Daijia River" towards the depths of the reservoir inlets, catching about six to seven jin of fish such as catfish and carp. After the incident, the Waterway First Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city confiscated the fishing equipment, including the voltage booster and battery, used by the defendants Jiang and Chen during the crime. It was also found that on June 12, 2015, the defendants Jiang and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Waterway First Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Jiang and Chen during the court trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Guo, Pan, and Cheng, along with the case registration form, household registration certificates, photos of the fishing equipment including the voltage booster and battery, handover lists, a statement issued by the city’s Fisheries Bureau, onsite identification records and photos, and other related evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county accuses: 1. At around 1:00 PM on January 13, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, climbed over the wall into Lanting Primary School located in the village, broke the surveillance camera inside the school, and stole one black Sony digital camera from the office of Lanting Primary School and Kindergarten, as well as 2 VCDs. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 1,250 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of January 14, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, climbed through the window into the home of a person named Jin in the village, and stole 4 packs of Liqun brand cigarettes. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen cigarettes was 80 yuan. 3. On the afternoon of January 14, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain field at Xiejiaqiao in a certain town of a certain county, pried the door lock, and entered the home of a person named Ye with the intent to steal but did not steal anything. In summary, the defendants Yang and Zhang committed theft together 3 times, with the total value of stolen items amounting to 1,330 yuan. After the incident, the digital camera involved in the case was recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang and Zhang during the trial process, and are corroborated by evidence such as photographs of the stolen items, evidence lists and return lists retrieved by the county's public security bureau, the criminal judgment, the decision letter of public security administrative penalty, the decision letter of labor re-education, the "Arrest Report" issued by a police officer from the county's public security bureau, the testimonies of Xu, Feng, and Qin, the statements of Jin and Ye, the price appraisal conclusion, and the on-site investigation record, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that at around 6 AM on March 5, 2014, because Zhao had previously defamed defendant Wu multiple times in front of defendant Zhang (defendants Zhang and Wu were in a romantic relationship), defendants Zhang and Wu jointly went to the entrance of Dushi Fenghua Residential Area at 95 Nanjiao Road, Haishu District, in this city, to confront Zhao. Due to disagreements in words, defendant Wu and Zhao got into a physical altercation, during which the two wrestled with each other. Seeing the situation, defendant Zhang joined Wu in beating the victim Zhao, resulting in fractures of the ninth and tenth ribs on the right side of Zhao, constituting minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Wu compensated Zhao for the economic losses and obtained Zhao's forgiveness; defendant Zhang voluntarily went to the public security bureau and truthfully confessed his crime. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Wu during the court trial and were corroborated by witness testimony from Shang, statements from victim Zhao, a recognition record, forensic assessment of human injury degree by the Haishu Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau's Physical Evidence Appraisal Office, medical records, a letter of forgiveness, household registration certificates, and the account of the arrest process, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges that in the early morning of May 11, 2018, defendants Huang and Hu, along with another individual named Hu1 (handled in a separate case), conspired whereby Huang and Hu1 damaged the doorknob of the basement warehouse at the construction site of the First Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. of China State Construction in a certain city in Dongxihu District. They stole over 6,000 meters of electrical wire (valued at 9,570 RMB), after which defendant Hu transported the wires out using a van. After selling off the stolen wires, Hu, Huang, and Hu1 divided the proceeds. Defendants Hu and Huang were apprehended by the police. They have compensated the victimized company 26,900 RMB and have obtained their understanding and forgiveness in return. During the trial, defendants Hu and Huang did not dispute these facts, which are substantiated by evidence such as the report materials, details of the apprehension, process of solving the case, identification information, sales contract, receipts, letter of forgiveness, statements from the victimized company's employees, confessions from defendants Hu and Huang, the price assessment conclusion report, surveillance video, on-site identification records, and records of retrieval, seizure, and identification, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.


After trial, it was found that at noon on May 25, 2015, the defendants Huang and Yao took advantage of the victim Zhang's absence and went to his home located in a certain residential area in an economic and technological development zone. They falsely claimed that they had forgotten their keys and requested a locksmith to help them unlock the door. They then stole a Samsung digital camera, a Samsung 799 mobile phone, a laptop, a gold ring, and other items, as well as 5000.00 yuan in cash. According to the appraisal by the local price certification center, the Samsung 799 mobile phone was valued at 200.00 yuan, and the Samsung digital camera was valued at 50.00 yuan. On June 4, 2015, defendant Huang was apprehended by the public security authorities. On June 3, 2015, defendant Yao was apprehended by the public security authorities. It was further found that defendant Huang had been subjected to administrative detention for five days and ten days on October 31, 2014, and May 31, 2015, respectively, by the public security authorities for drug use, and was fined 500 yuan. Defendant Yao had been subjected to administrative detention for fifteen days on January 30, 2015, and February 10, 2015, by the public security authorities for drug use and was fined 2000 yuan, with an additional three years of community rehabilitation. There is no objection from defendants Huang and Yao during the court trial regarding the above facts, and this is corroborated by evidence including the victim’s report and statement materials, witness testimony, identification records, search records, list of seized items, price appraisal report, administrative penalty decision, community rehabilitation decision, criminal judgment, release certificate, capture process, household registration evidence, and the confessions of defendants Huang and Yao, all sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it was found that in October 2016, an individual named Chen contacted the defendant Chen through QQ to purchase the drug methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice"). The two agreed on a transaction of approximately 2 grams of methamphetamine for a price of 1,000 RMB at the south gate of Bao'an Park in a certain city. Subsequently, Chen entrusted Fang to help purchase the drugs. On the evening of March 1, 2017, Fang bought 2 units of methamphetamine from the defendant Yu for 600 RMB at Bao'an Park, and then brought the aforementioned drugs to the south gate of the park to hand them over to Chen. According to the location and transaction price agreed upon by Chen and Chen A, an individual named He paid Chen 1,000 RMB via WeChat transfer and arrived at the scene to conduct the transaction with Chen. When Chen handed over a package of drugs to He, the police arrested Chen and Fang, seizing a package suspected to be drugs (weighing 1.29 grams) from He's possession, along with a cellphone from Chen and another cellphone from Fang. On the evening of March 2, 2017, Fang contacted Yu by phone again to purchase methamphetamine. Yu agreed and when he arrived at the south gate of Bao'an Park to meet Fang, the police arrested Yu and seized his cellphone. Upon examination, methamphetamine was detected in the seized suspected drugs. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Yu during the trial, and they were corroborated by related evidence verified in court, sufficient for confirmation.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that from February to September 2014, defendants Li and Zuo jointly operated gambling arcade machines near Lupu Town Junior High School in Funing County, with profits divided according to a set ratio. Defendant Li installed two "Oriental Pearl" gambling arcade machines and one "Three Six Leopard" (Fishing Season) gambling arcade machine in a hot shop operated by defendant Zuo in a certain location, for others to use for gambling. During this period, they profited a total of 2,225 RMB. After the incident, defendant Li voluntarily turned himself in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the above-mentioned criminal facts; after being apprehended, defendant Zuo also truthfully confessed to the above facts. These facts, which defendants Li and Zuo did not dispute during the court proceedings, are corroborated by evidence including the household registration certificate issued by the Public Security Bureau of Funing County, the case briefing, the on-site inspection record produced, the certificate of identification of electronic game facilities and equipment with gambling functions issued by the Yancheng City Public Security Bureau, and the receipt for fines and confiscations, and are sufficient to be established.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 2 a.m. on May 13, 2020, the defendants Pang and Liu stole a Bao Diao brand motorcycle, which Pang A had sold to the victim Wang on May 12, 2020, and hid it in the Longfeng Mingdu residential area. According to the appraisal, the stolen motorcycle was valued at RMB 3,465. It was further ascertained that the defendants Pang and Liu were apprehended by the public security authorities on May 13, 2020. After the incident, the stolen motorcycle was returned to the victim, who has expressed understanding towards the defendants. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Pang and Liu during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the police reception registration form, case registration form, victim Wang’s statement, witness Lu’s testimony, Alipay transfer records, identification transcripts and photos, on-site identification transcripts and photos, seizure decision documents, seizure transcripts, seizure lists, return lists, price appraisal reports, explanatory statements regarding the case resolution, defendant's basic information, household registration certificate, letter of understanding, and confessions and interrogation recordings of defendants Pang and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city in Hubei Province alleges: On April 5, 2014, at around 15:00, the defendant Sheng, after consuming services at the Yinxiu Tea House operated by Qu at 7 Linjiang Avenue in a certain district of a certain city, believed the charges were too high and failed to receive a printed invoice. Suspecting he had been cheated, Sheng became dissatisfied and invited defendants He, Nie, and others to the location with knives. They smashed the tea house's screens, displays, sofas, and other items, and assaulted the attendant Hu, causing injuries. An assessment concluded that Hu's injuries were minor; the total damage to items amounted to 5,500 RMB. Upon reporting to the police, defendant Sheng was apprehended while fleeing the scene. Sheng's family has compensated the tea house and Hu a total of 7,000 RMB. At Sheng's persuasion, defendants He and Nie voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on June 12 of the same year. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution provides: 1. Reports from the public security authorities on the arrest, the arrival of the defendants, and the case resolution; 2. Lists of seized items and photos of physical evidence; 3. Documentary evidence; 4. Testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Xu, Li, and others; 5. Statements from the victims Qu and Hu; 6. Confessions and defenses of defendants Sheng, He, and Nie; 7. Forensic assessment opinions, appraisal conclusions on the value of damages, and identification of controlled knives.


The prosecution charges: On February 27, 2017, at around 17:00, the security guard Yu, who was on duty at the office building of the South Building Economic Development Zone Management Committee, along with electrician Liu and security captain Huang, removed petitioners Zeng, Wu, Zeng, and Zeng from the office building. Subsequently, Zeng, Jin, and Jin arrived at the scene after hearing the news and engaged in a conflict with the staff. While Yu and Liu were dragging Jin, Jin sustained an injury to the right shoulder. According to the judicial appraisal by the local Public Security and Judicial Appraisal Center, Jin's injury was classified as minor injury level two. Furthermore, it was found that both parties voluntarily reached a mediation agreement regarding civil compensation. Yu and Liu paid a one-time compensation of 100,000 RMB to the victim, Jin, for economic losses due to the injury, and the victim expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial. The case is supported by the victim Jin's statement, testimonies of witnesses Huang, Li, Zhang, Jiang, Zeng, Wu, Zeng, Zeng, and Jin, appraisal opinion, audio-visual materials, and the understanding letter, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After the trial, it was found that at around 19:00 on November 28, 2013, the defendant Pei, driving a certain place's F××××× licensed truck without a license, was traveling from east to west along the old National Highway 112 when he reached the section north of Taoxinzhuang community. There, he collided with the victim Hu, who was riding an electric bicycle and turning left towards the east, causing Hu to fall and get injured. Pei fled the scene in his vehicle. Later, the defendant Zhang, driving a certain place's F××××× licensed minibus, traveled from east to west to the accident location and collided again with the victim Hu, who was lying on the road. Zhang then fled the scene in his vehicle. After being injured, the victim Hu died despite rescue efforts. According to forensic identification, the victim Hu died due to craniocerebral injuries caused by the traffic accident. The Gao Beidian City Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade analyzed and determined that defendants Pei and Zhang were fully responsible for the accident, while Hu bore no responsibility. After the incident, defendants Pei and Zhang turned themselves in to the Gao Beidian City Traffic Police Brigade the following day and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime. During the trial, defendants Pei and Zhang each reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim's family. Pei and Zhang each compensated the victim's family for economic losses of 420,000 RMB and have fulfilled this obligation. The victim's family expressed understanding and forgiveness towards the two defendants. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Pei and Zhang during the trial, and the evidence provided, including the testimony of the witness Li, the traffic accident scene investigation record, scene maps and photos, the traffic accident identification report, the vehicle inspection report and photos, the forensic autopsy analysis report and photos, motor vehicle driving license and registration inquiry information, compensation agreement and receipts, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificate, and statement of surrender, are sufficient to confirm the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Zhuang Autonomous Region of Guangxi charges: On May 2, 2014, defendants Mao and Lang, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, cut down a camphor tree located at "Xianniang Temple" (a place name) in a village of a certain town in a certain county. Just as the two were about to transport the felled camphor tree away, they were caught on the spot by the county's forest police, who acted on a tip-off. According to the technical appraisal conducted by the county's forestry bureau: one camphor tree was felled. The tree species was camphor, with a diameter at breast height of 53 centimeters, a height of 8.1 meters, a volume of 0.7739 cubic meters, and a material yield of 0.5100 cubic meters.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charged that between January and March 2014, defendants Zhu and Zhao twice allowed Xia and Teng, among others, to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in a rented house in Lingjiacang, Xieshi Street, of the said city. On a day in February 2014, defendant Zhu allowed Teng to use methamphetamine in the aforementioned rented house. Additionally, after being apprehended for drug use, defendant Zhu voluntarily confessed to the act of accommodating others to use drugs. During the court trial, defendants Zhu and Zhao did not contest these facts, which were substantiated by witness testimony, inspection records, on-site test reports, identification records, photographs, administrative penalty decision documents, arrest records, and household registration proofs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon examination, it has been found that at approximately 10:30 PM on April 26, 2015, the defendants Wang and Yang were near Qingxuan Foot Therapy Shop on Huaiyuan Street, Yongyang Town, a district in a certain city. After a suggestion by Wang, Yang acted as a lookout, while Wang used wire splicing to steal a Shun'an brand electric tricycle parked there, belonging to the victim Liu. The tricycle was valued at 3,960 RMB according to an appraisal. After the crime, the stolen electric tricycle was recovered. On April 28, 2015, Wang and Yang were apprehended by public security authorities, and both confessed their criminal activities truthfully after being taken into custody. During the court hearing, Wang and Yang raised no objections to the above facts. These facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented by the public prosecution and verified in court: 1. The statement of the victim Liu; 2. The appraisal certificate; 3. Identification records and photos; 4. Photos of the stolen goods, a copy of the purchase receipt, the registration form for the case, the decision to file the case, household registration materials, the process of arrest; 5. The confessions of defendants Wang and Yang.