After trial and investigation, it was found that in August 2017, Chen (fugitive) and another Chen (fugitive) established Ganzhou Diantuo Cultural Media Co., Ltd. in Room 501, Building 1, Zhongting Forest Mansion, Changzheng Avenue, Zhanggong District, a certain city. The defendants, Huang and Zheng, served as managers of this company, responsible for salary distribution and employee management. During this period, the two defendants, under the company's name, became agents of the "Yinghuang Platform" (an illegal gambling website accepting bets and awarding prizes over the internet) and hired more than ten employees as sub-agents. They issued agent numbers exclusively for them to calculate the members they developed, the betting amounts, and rebates. Company employees sent platform links to players via QQ, WeChat, etc., allowing players to enter the "Yinghuang Platform" through the provided links, register, recharge, and participate in gambling activities on this online platform, which used the "Chongqing Time Lottery" results as a medium. The defendants, Huang and Zheng, received 4% of the "net loss amount" on the gambling website developed by company members as a bonus. On April 18, 2018, at around 16:00, the defendants, Huang and Zheng, were arrested by public security officers. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang and Zheng during the court hearings, and were corroborated by: the case registration form, testimonies of witnesses Wei, Qi, Liao, Hua, Xue, Zhong, Peng, Chen, Ye, Liu, Zhang, Xiao, Guo, another Zhang, and Zhou, identification records and criminal photography, search warrant and search records, seizure decision and inventory list, electronic evidence inspection records, screenshots of the Yinghuang International page, housing lease agreement, site location sketches, site floor plans, and site photos, employee training and salary documents, website revenue and expenditure statements, bank card transaction flow lists, administrative penalty decision, arrest process, audiovisual materials, household registration certificates, and the defendants Huang and Zheng's confessions during the investigation, which provided sufficient evidence for conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 9 a.m. on July 25, 2019, the defendant Liu, due to an emotional dispute, had a conflict with Zhou at Zhou's home. During the conflict, Liu assaulted Zhou and smashed Zhou's home property. Liu then demanded Zhou to go downstairs with him. While continuing the dispute on the second-floor platform of Zhou's house, the defendant Yu arrived at the scene. Yu held Zhou's head and hands, and Liu stripped off Zhou's clothes. After being stripped, Zhou ran to his sedan, and Liu pulled Zhou out of the car to the trunk area to insult Zhou. Later, police from the Qiaotou police station arrived and stopped Liu's actions. The evidence supporting the above facts includes: 1. A set of documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Wang, Cui, and Han, among others; 3. The victim Zhou's statement; 4. The confessions and defenses of the defendants Liu and Yu; 5. Appraisal report; 6. On-site inspection records, site diagrams and photos, examination records and photos; 7. CD. The sources of the above evidence are legal and corroborate each other.


The prosecution charges that since March 2014, defendants Xu and Ying, knowing that the state prohibits the addition of "carmoisine" and "sunset yellow" in meat products, nonetheless added "carmoisine" and "sunset yellow" purchased by defendant Ying to prepared foods such as duck heads, duck necks, and duck feet in order to attract customers. They sold these products at the "＊＊ Store" located at ** Road, **, Yue Long Street, ** County, and by August 22, 2014, when discovered by the County Market Supervision Bureau, sales had reached over 60,000 RMB. Upon sampling and testing, "carmoisine" and "sunset yellow" were detected in the prepared foods such as duck feet seized from the "＊＊ Store" operated by defendants Xu and Ying. According to the national food safety standard GB2760-2011, the tested items "carmoisine" and "sunset yellow" did not meet the standard requirements. On October 10, 2014, defendant Ying surrendered to public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented in court the confessions of defendants Xu and Ying, relevant witness testimonies, recognition transcripts, on-site inspection transcripts and photos, seizure lists, test reports, certification, the course of the case, and demographic information forms, among other evidence.


The court investigation revealed that around 14:30 on March 9, 2014, the defendants Wei and Huang arrived near No. 46 Yilu, Shajing Street, Bao'an District. The defendants noticed that the victim, Lin, had a phone in his pocket. Defendant Huang deliberately walked alongside Lin to create a diversion, while defendant Wei used tweezers, which had been prepared in advance, to steal Lin's Coolpad phone (valued at 335 RMB according to appraisal). A bystander, Zhou, noticed and informed the victim, leading the victim and his friends to give chase. Huang feigned innocence and intentionally misled the victim by pointing him in the wrong direction. However, Zhou and two other bystanders later surrounded Huang. When the victim returned, they informed him, and Huang voluntarily returned the phone, pleading with the victim not to call the police. Seeing the unfavorable situation, Wei also emerged to plead with the victim not to report them, but the victim and others restrained them and contacted the police. Law enforcement arrived and took the two defendants for further investigation. The defendants Wei and Huang raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and relevant evidence corroborated during the trial was sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged the defendants, Chen and Zhang, with colluding with Zhou (handled in a separate case), Dong, and others on December 25, 2014, from approximately 9:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. the following day. They brought the victim, Bian, to Room XX at XX Hotel, Chengjiang Street in the said city, to demand a debt repayment. The defendants used verbal threats, slapping, and other methods to coerce the victim, Bian, into repaying the debt. During this period, the defendant Zhang used a shoe to slap the victim, Bian, while the defendant Chen repeatedly slapped the victim, Bian. These facts have been confessed multiple times by the defendants, Chen and Zhang, and there was no objection during the court hearing. Furthermore, evidence such as an IOU, outpatient medical records, hotel security management information, administrative penalty decisions, statements from the victim, Bian, testimonies from witnesses like Zhou, Dong, and Wu, identification records and photographs, population information, and the investigation process of the criminal case, all confirm these facts, which are sufficient for a conviction.


The prosecution alleges that on May 17, 2015, Yang had a dispute with a peer, Zhou, over the real estate agency business. Yang invited Zhou, Fu, and others to negotiate at the University Students Entrepreneurial Base in Hongshan District, Wuhan, where the defendant Wu was located. As the negotiations failed, Zhou and others had another physical altercation with Yang. The defendant Wu instructed the defendants Wang and Gong to encircle Zhou's car and drag the victim Fu out of the car, inflicting multiple cuts on his head and right shoulder. An assessment determined that Fu's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. After the incident, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Gong voluntarily turned themselves in, reached a mediation agreement with the victim, and obtained forgiveness. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence in court to substantiate them.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that the closed fishing season in a certain area of a certain province is from 12:00 on April 1 to 12:00 on June 1 each year. At 17:00 on May 18, 2015, defendants Liu and Shi illegally caught aquatic products using two "electric fishing machines" in the river channel area under the San Zhou West Sea Bridge in Lun Jiao, a district of a certain city (a tributary of a certain area). On site, a blue plastic bucket (containing 5.04 jin of fish) and two homemade "electric fishing machines" were seized. The prosecution provided the following evidence: the process of capture; the confessions, identification records, and on-site identifications by defendants Shi and Liu of the crime scene, tools used, and fish caught; the search record; the seizure, handling, and transfer lists; household registration certificates; announcements from the Ministry of Agriculture on the closed fishing season system in the area, implementation plans for the closed fishing season system in a specific province, and explanations of closed fishing areas in specific districts; newspapers; on-site investigation records and photographs. The prosecution believes that defendants Shi and Liu, disregarding national laws, conducted fishing using prohibited methods during the closed fishing season and in prohibited fishing areas. Their behavior violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient. They should be held criminally responsible for crime x. According to Article x of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, this court is requested to impose a sentence according to the law. Defendants Shi and Liu have no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged by the prosecution. After trial, it was found that the facts of crime x charged against defendants Shi and Liu by the prosecution are clear. The evidence, verified in court, is true and sufficient, and this court hereby confirms it.


The prosecution alleges: Defendants Xu and Shang were, respectively, the legal representative and shareholder of a certain company, responsible for its business management. From November 2011 to February 2012, defendants Xu and Shang, after prior consultation, knowingly produced 256 boxes and 4 rolls of joint tape bearing the "LAFARGE" trademark and 881 boxes of joint tape bearing the "KNAUF" trademark, without obtaining the permission of the registered trademark owners of "LAFARGE" and "KNAUF." Among these, 150 boxes of joint tape with the "LAFARGE" trademark were sold at 70 yuan per box, yielding 10,500 yuan; and 45 boxes of joint tape with the "KNAUF" trademark were sold at 70 yuan per box, yielding 3,150 yuan. The unsold products were valued at 65,954 yuan based on the actual selling price. After the case came to light, defendant Shang voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to the facts of counterfeiting registered trademarks. After Xu's case was brought to closure, he also truthfully confessed to the facts of counterfeiting registered trademarks. During the court proceedings, defendant Xu returned illegal gains totaling 13,650 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Shang during the trial and are substantiated by evidence such as on-site transcripts, the company's basic information, change of registration details, decisions on administrative enforcement measures, the business license of the corporate legal entity, document extraction slips, photo production slips, trademark registration certificates, authorization letters, the document transferring the suspected criminal case, details of the case, explanatory notes, and household registration certificates of both defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The court investigation established that at approximately 13:00 on July 31, 2013, defendants Lu and Wang, for the purpose of making a profit, gathered Chai, Wu, Xu, Meng, Xu, and others to engage in gambling using the “Tunzi 28” method at the home of Shen, located at 117 Zhuzidou, Yangshuhe Village, Lianshitown, Nanxun District of the city, and earned over 1,000 RMB from it. On August 2, 2013, at approximately 13:00, defendants Lu and Wang, with the intent of making a profit, gathered Shen, Shen, Lao, Xu, Xu, and others to gamble at the same location and profited by taking a rake-off of 5,600 RMB. In summary, defendants Lu and Wang organized two gambling sessions, obtaining a profit of over 6,600 RMB. After the incident, the public security authorities confiscated illicit money amounting to 5,600 RMB. The facts mentioned above were not contested by defendants Lu and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as permanent resident registration forms, population information, the testimonies of witnesses Shen, Lao, Meng, Xu, Xu, Ye, and others, detention certificates, an account of the capture, inspection records, identification records, explanatory statements, and the confessions of defendants Lu and Wang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was found that on November 13, 2013, due to quality issues with the cement used in the construction of Qian's house, at around 14:00 that day, Jidong Cement Factory salesperson Yang Yi, Meng, and engineer Gao, among others, drove to Qian's house in a certain village in a development zone to resolve the cement quality issue. Upon arrival, Yang Yi, Meng, and Gao parked their vehicle in the alley in front of Qian's house. Later, Qian blocked the alley entrance with a truck and closed his front door. During the discussion about the cement quality issue at Qian's home, a dispute arose, and Qian and defendant Wang assaulted the three victims, claiming, "No one can leave until this is resolved." Around 15:00, Qian called defendant Zhang to the scene, who then assaulted Yang Yi upon arrival. The victims were not allowed to leave Qian's house until approximately 20:00 that day. Forensic identification confirmed that Yang Yi's injuries were minor. On December 23, 2013, defendant Qian voluntarily turned himself in to law enforcement, and on November 6, 2014, defendants Wang and Zhang also voluntarily turned themselves in. All three defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts after arriving at the police station. Additionally, it was confirmed that after the incident, the defendants compensated the victims Yang Yi and Gao for their economic losses and received their understanding. These facts were not disputed by defendants Qian, Wang, and Zhang during the court trial and were sufficiently substantiated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Qian, Wang, and Zhang; statements from victims Yang Yi, Gao, and Meng; testimony from witness Yang Jia; forensic medical injury assessment documentation; identification records; arrest records, household registration proof, case handling descriptions, prior conviction records, and other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Huaibei City charges: From May 2013 to October 2013, the defendants Zhou and Zhu repeatedly committed theft of other's property in certain districts. Among them, Zhou was involved in 14 cases, with a total value of 14,473 RMB, while Zhu participated in 6 cases, with a total value of 5,723 RMB. To substantiate the above facts, the public prosecution provided the court with the following evidence: household registration certificates, the process of apprehension, seizure warrants, explanations, re-education through labor decisions, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release after serving sentences, and so on. Additionally, appraisal opinions, on-site investigation records, diagrams, photos, and identification records were provided along with testimonies from witnesses Cheng Moujia, Cheng Mouyi, Cai Mou, and others, and statements from victims Wang Moujia, Liang Mou, Li Mou, and others.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from early 2015 to April 2015, the defendant Hu and Chen jointly engaged in organizing prostitution. Initially, defendant Hu printed pornography cards containing a phone number meant for soliciting prostitution and distributed them by riding his electric scooter to hotels such as the Speed 8 Hotel on Baili Road and the Reiss Hotel on Nanpu Road. When clients called the phone number on the pornographic cards to indicate their interest in prostitution, defendant Chen or defendant Hu would negotiate the price with the clients and contact prostitutes like Long to go to the client's place for prostitution. The two defendants and the prostitutes would then split the proceeds among them according to prior agreements. Around 2:30 a.m. on March 18, 2015, defendant Chen received a phone call and arranged for the prostitute Long to go to room B405 at the Reiss Motor Inn on Nanpu Road to engage in prostitution with client Lin, collecting a fee of 400 yuan; at approximately 10:30 p.m. on April 10, 2015, defendant Hu received a phone call and arranged for the prostitute Long to go to room 8303 at the Speed 8 Hotel on Baili Dong Road to engage in prostitution with client Tang, also collecting a fee of 400 yuan. Subsequently, the two defendants together obtained a total of 300 yuan from the prostitution proceeds. The above facts were not disputed by defendant Hu and Chen during the court hearing, and were confirmed by testimonies from witnesses Long, Tang, and Lin, as well as evidence such as the process of arrest, photos of tools used in the crime, identification documents, criminal judgment, proof of release after serving a sentence, administrative penalty decision, seizure decision, seizure list, evidence retrieval list, call records, search warrants, statements of circumstances, personnel identification records, site identification records, location search records, surveillance videos, video screenshots, among others, sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On June 4, 2016, at approximately 14:00, the defendants Sun and Zhong sold heroin to drug user Kong in their residence located at Unit 1, Room 101, Building 10, North District of Gongnong Village, Xigu District, in a certain city. Kong took a small portion of the purchased drug and gave it to Sun for consumption. Subsequently, when the drug user Kong attempted to leave Sun's residence with the drugs, he was apprehended. The police discovered a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.47 grams on Kong. Additionally, 300 yuan in gambling funds and a mobile phone used for committing the crime were found in the bag carried by the defendants. From defendant Sun, the police seized 0.08 grams of methamphetamine given by Kong for consumption and another mobile phone used for committing the crime. Furthermore, two packets of methamphetamine, totaling 3.8 grams, jointly purchased by defendants Sun and Zhong, were found in Sun’s home. Both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court, which, by law, could result in a lesser penalty. However, both defendants are repeat offenders, and Sun, in particular, is a repeat offender of drug crimes, warranting a severe penalty according to law. It is requested that the court impose a sentence according to the law. The defendants Sun and Zhong raised no objections to these facts during the trial. The case materials are substantiated by the evidence including the case filing registration, seizure decision, seizure list and photographs, physicochemical examination and identification report, testimony of witness Kong, confessions of defendants Sun and Zhong, call records, criminal judgment and release certificates, basic information form of permanent residents, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.


Upon trial, it was found: At around 22:00 on March 25, 2015, the defendants Liang and Wu went to a certain location in the village of a certain town in a certain city and sold Liu two small packets of the drug tetrabenzylamphetamine (commonly known as "methamphetamine") for 200 yuan. Subsequently, the defendants Liang and Wu were apprehended on the spot, and two small packets of the drug methamphetamine, along with 200 yuan in drug money, were confiscated. After examination, the two small packets of suspicious substances weighed 1.43 grams net and were found to contain methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Liang and Wu during the court hearing. Along with the statements of the witness Liu, identification records, seizure lists, drug identification reports, defendants' identification of the drugs, drug money, and crime scene photographs, on-site urine test reports, on-site investigation records, on-site drawings and photos, the defendants' household registration information, and the details of their arrest, these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges: In March 2011, the defendants Huang and Zuo rented vacant land in a certain village, district, and city to set up a simple yuba (tofu skin) processing workshop, engaging in unlicensed production and sale of yuba. From early 2016 to May 2017, defendants Huang and Zuo, in order to ensure the yuba produced had a long shelf life, good color, and would sell well, consistently added non-food additives sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and borax (both substances listed in "Non-Food Substances That Might Be Illegally Added to Food") during processing and sold them on the market. On May 8, 2017, officers from the Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in a certain city conducted an inspection at the yuba processing factory operated by defendants Huang and Zuo, located at group one of a certain village in a certain district in a certain city (next to the newly built flood control embankment pumping station). During the inspection, they seized 18 rods of semi-finished yuba weighing a total of 200.3 pounds (after sampling and testing, all were found to contain sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and borax, with a test conclusion of non-compliance), as well as a bag of borax, a bag of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, and processing equipment and other items.


The prosecution alleges: During the period from 2011 to 2015, the defendant Tao took advantage of his positions as the director of the Circuit Breaker Branch Factory, the manager, and the secretary of the Customer Service Center at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd. to illegally accept a total of 100,000 RMB from Lin, the general manager of Pingdingshan Huijuyuan Co., Ltd. This was in exchange for helping Lin's company win bids for outsourced labor services at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center, and providing assistance after winning the bid in securing contracts for on-site painting, repainting, secondary wiring, and timely settlement of labor payments. Tao used the 100,000 RMB for personal daily expenses. After the case was uncovered, the illicit money was returned.

During the period from 2013 to 2014, the defendant Zhang, utilizing his position as the information section chief of the Customer Service Center at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd., illegally accepted 50,600 RMB and a 3,500 RMB shopping card from Lin, the general manager of Pingdingshan Huijuyuan Electrical Co., Ltd. This was in exchange for helping Lin's company secure more outsourced labor services for on-site painting, repainting, secondary wiring, and timely settlement of labor fees at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center. During the same period, Zhang also used his position to illegally accept 17,000 RMB and a 1,500 RMB shopping card from Guo, the project manager of Pingdingshan Beiyoute Electrical Co., Ltd. Zhang provided assistance to Guo's company for securing more outsourced labor services, such as on-site painting and repainting, at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center and facilitated timely payment settlements. The total amount of 67,600 RMB and 5,000 RMB in shopping cards received by Zhang was used for his personal daily expenses. The prosecution presented related evidence in court.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged the following: Defendants Tan and Hu are in a marital relationship. On February 26, 2014, defendant Tan impersonated victim An and activated a Bank of China Great Wall International Credit Card applied for by An. Tan then instructed Hu to use this card to withdraw a total of 5,000 yuan in cash from the Lichuan branch of the Agricultural Bank of China in three transactions. Subsequently, Hu used the credit card at the Lichuan Zhaosheng Technology and Trade Co., Ltd. Tianqiao business hall to purchase an Apple mobile phone worth 2,999 yuan. After the incident, defendants Tan and Hu turned themselves in to the public security authorities and returned 8,100 yuan in cash to victim An. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Hu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the statements of the victim; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; records of examination, inspection, identification, and investigative experiments; as well as audiovisual materials, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Leye County, in the Zhuang District of a certain place, charged that on June 7, 2014, at around 7 PM, the defendants Huang and Tian conspired together in the Mingling Auto Repair Shop located in the northern part of Leye County. Defendant Tian was responsible for covering, while Huang stole an Apple mobile phone placed on the computer desk in the shop, belonging to Huang Mingling, valued at 2,274 yuan. The stolen goods were pawned by Tian to Xie for a loan. After the incident, the stolen item was recovered and returned to the owner.


Upon investigation, it was found: Wang and Zhao both built houses in Xiaohetou Village, a certain city. They are neighbors and had a dispute over the construction of a courtyard wall between their houses. On the morning of September 20, 2013, Wu (already sentenced), arranged by Wang, led the defendant Yuan and others to Wang's house to build the courtyard wall. Zhao's side discovered this and had a dispute with Wu and others. Around 11:00 AM the same day, while Wu was having lunch with Wang and others, he learned that Zhao's side had torn down part of the wall they had built. He then contacted the defendants Feng and Yuan and others to rush to the scene and requested Feng to handle the matter. Wu and Wang subsequently left the scene and arranged for Yuan (already sentenced) to drive his car to assist. The defendants Feng and Yuan then called upon Yin, Zhan, Xiao, and Zhu (handled in another case) to bring the machetes and steel pipes Yuan had prepared in advance to the scene and smashed Zhao's house windows, doors, and other property. According to the appraisal, the value of the loss was 24,997.00 yuan. On September 19, 2014, defendant Feng was administratively detained by the public security organ for drug use and providing gambling conditions, and was criminally detained on September 16 of the same year. On September 26, 2014, police, acting on a public tip-off, arrested defendant Yuan near Xiongji Dumpling Restaurant in Fuxin Community, Gulou Office, a certain city. It was also found that Wu, a co-defendant, compensated Zhao for all the losses. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Feng and Yuan during the trial and were evidenced by the testimony of co-defendants Wu, Zeng, and Yuan; statements from victim Zhao; witness statements from Wang, Zhou and others; the price appraisal conclusion by the Price Certification Center of the Municipal Bureau of Commodity Prices; the criminal judgment by the Municipal People's Court; the report of the Municipal Public Security Bureau on the incident; and the household registration certificates of defendants Feng and Yuan, sufficient to establish these facts.


Upon trial, it was found that around 11 p.m. on November 9, 2014, the defendant Huang gathered the defendant Dai, along with Chen A, Chen B, and "Little Someone" (all handled in separate cases), and went to the victim You's home located at Room 2605, No.175 Yinghuang Lake, Hubin North Road, Siming District, a certain city, to demand a debt, but to no avail. At around 5 a.m. the next day, defendants Huang, Dai, and others returned to the above location. As the victim You refused to open the door again, defendant Huang called a locksmith to try to pry open the lock. When the locksmith arrived, he stopped attempting to unlock the door after noticing someone inside. Defendant Dai then took a hammer from the locksmith’s toolbox and smashed the security door and wooden door, forcing entry into the victim You's residence with Huang and others. The public security authorities, upon receiving a report from victim You, rushed to the scene and arrested defendants Huang and Dai on the spot. After the incident, defendants Huang and Dai compensated the victim for the relevant economic losses and obtained forgiveness. The above facts were confessed by defendants Huang and Dai during the court hearing, corroborated by their pre-trial confessions and defenses, the victim You's statement, testimonies of witnesses Chen A, Chen B, Zhou, and Fu, as well as photos of the damaged security and wooden doors, identification records, extraction records, evidence collection records, receipt of evidence list, house lease contract, debt acknowledgment letter, letter of forgiveness, residential status certificates of Huang and Dai, their criminal record inquiry explanation, the public security authorities' report of apprehension, case details, and legal documents of compulsory measures, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On January 1, 2014, defendants Huang and Meng conspired to cover for each other and jointly looked for opportunities to steal other people's property. At around 8:00 PM that day, the two followed the victim, Zeng Moujia, near Hongcheng Bus Station on Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, in this city. Meng stole a black Samsung I8250 phone from the pocket of Zeng Moujia's coat (valued at RMB 295 according to appraisal). After succeeding, Meng quickly transferred the phone to Huang. Subsequently, the two were caught red-handed by plainclothes police officers.


Upon investigation, it was found that at approximately 22:00 on September 10, 2013, defendants Lei, Kong, and "A" (handled in a separate case) were drinking together at a grilled fish restaurant at the entrance of Jin Xiu New Village on Sanlian Road in the Longhua New District of a certain city. As they were about to leave, they happened to encounter the victim Tang and his colleague Yang walking by. Defendant Kong then reached out and touched Yang's face, which Yang blocked. Kong subsequently struck Yang on the back, causing Yang to shout. Victim Tang immediately stepped forward to stop defendant Kong, resulting in a physical altercation between the parties. Defendants Lei, Kong, and "A" then used fists, feet, and bricks to attack victims Tang and Yang, causing multiple injuries to Tang. After receiving Yang's report, police arrived at the scene and apprehended defendants Lei and Kong. According to the assessment, victim Tang sustained multiple soft tissue injuries throughout his body


After the trial, it was found that the defendant Sha is the actual owner of a Liberation brand heavy box truck without a license plate (displayed at the time of the incident as B××××× from a certain locality). Sha illicitly changed the vehicle’s chassis number to match the chassis number of another truck with a license plate B××××× from a certain locality. On October 30, 2014, around 10:15 am, Sha instructed the defendant Wu to drive his unlicensed Liberation brand heavy truck (displayed at the time of the incident as B××××× from a certain locality) southbound along the Shenqiao line. When reaching 1km+905m on this line, due to Wu's speeding (exceeding the speed limit by 130%), the vehicle collided with an unlicensed hand-held tractor traveling eastward, driven without a license by Liu Moujia. This collision instantly resulted in the death of Liu Moubing, a passenger on the hand-held tractor. According to a forensic examination by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the victim Liu Moubing died due to severe cranial brain damage. The Traffic Police Brigade of a certain city determined that defendant Wu bears the main responsibility for this accident, Liu Moujia bears secondary responsibility, and Liu Moubing bears no responsibility. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, defendants Sha and Wu independently reached a civil settlement with the close relatives of the victim Liu Moubing, receiving their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defen


According to the accusation of the People's Procuratorate of a certain place, at around 11 a.m. on May 27, 2015, the defendants Xuan and Chen saw a blue Yamaha ladies' motorcycle unattended near the section of the road by the Xin Qiao Village Committee in Hengxian County, Hengzhou Town. Xuan proposed to Chen to steal the motorcycle, to which Chen agreed. Xuan then pried open and started the motorcycle, while Chen removed the license plate, and together they stole the motorcycle. Later, Xuan sold the stolen motorcycle to Mai for 1,000 yuan and gave Chen 300 yuan as his share. Subsequently, Mai lost the motorcycle while using it. According to the valuation by the Hengxian County Price Appraisal Center, the motorcycle involved was valued at 3,530 yuan. Furthermore, it was found that during compulsory detoxification, Xuan voluntarily confessed to the police about the criminal fact of stealing the motorcycle in this case together with Chen, which had not yet been discovered by the judicial authorities; Chen truthfully confessed the criminal facts of the case after being brought to justice. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xuan and Chen during the trial and were corroborated by evidence provided by the prosecution, including the statement of the victim Bi Daocang, the testimony of the witness Mai, the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the arrest process, household registration certificates, case handling explanations, lists of seizures and returns, administrative penalty decision, compulsory detoxification decision, the vehicle registration certificate, the price appraisal conclusion issued by the Hengxian County Price Appraisal Center, the on-site investigation transcript, site maps, site photos, and the confessions made by the defendants Xuan and Chen to the police, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.


The prosecution alleges that from February 15, 2014, the defendants Chen and Ceng, in collusion with a co-defendant Meng (already sentenced), confined Wang, who had been deceived and brought to a suspected pyramid scheme group's rental house at No. 13, Fifth Alley, Datiandong, Jianggao Town, in a certain district of this city. They imposed the confinement by means such as monitoring, following, and confiscating his mobile phone. At around 11 a.m. on February 19, while Chen and the co-defendant Meng were taking Wang out for a class, Wang called for help to a passing police car, leading Meng to assault Wang. Subsequently, the police apprehended Meng and Chen and rescued Wang. At around 1 p.m., Ceng was arrested. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution read and presented evidence during the court trial, including the victim's statement, witness testimonies, inspection records, and confessions from the defendants. Based on the above facts and evidence,


Upon trial, it was found that on May 2, 2014, at around 14:00, the defendants Yang and Chen, after premeditated discussion, proceeded to a certain alley beside the Guilin Zai Mong Kok Hair Salon on Donglong Road in a certain city's urban area. Yang served as a lookout while Chen went up and pried open the ignition lock and anti-theft lock of a black Hai Ai Ni brand Little Tortoise King model electric scooter parked there by Wu. Subsequently, Yang rode away with the scooter. Inside the seat box of the stolen scooter were two packs of True Dragon brand Haiyun cigarettes. After the crime, all stolen items were retrieved by the public security agency and returned to the owner, Wu. According to an appraisal by the price certification center of the local city, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,130 RMB, and the two packs of True Dragon brand Haiyun cigarettes valued at 1,000 RMB. Furthermore, it was found that defendant Yang was previously convicted of a crime and sentenced by this court to six months of imprisonment on October 9, 2005, and was released after serving the term on January 28, 2006. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Chen during the trial, and there are supporting evidence such as crime report forms, the process of arrest, photos identifying the scene, photos identifying stolen goods, photos identifying crime tools, site identification records, lists of seized items and documents, lists of returned items and documents, Wu's interrogation records, receipts, interrogation records of Yang and Chen, household registration proofs, sentence documents from Yuzhou District People's Court of a certain city [2005] Yufa Criminal First Instance No. 505, release certificate from the Second Detention Center of the city Yufa Second Release No. [2006] 42, relevant materials on Yang and Chen's compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation, and price appraisal conclusion document by the city's Price Certification Center Yujiad [2014] No. 241; adequate to substantiate the facts.


The prosecution charges: 1. On October 18, 2015, at around 3 a.m., the defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 75, a certain village in a certain county. Defendant Yu acted as a lookout outside while defendant Zhang used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 106 of Li. They stole a BBK X1ST mobile phone (valued at 607 RMB) and a BBK X5M mobile phone (valued at 1,569 RMB). 2. On October 18, 2015, at around 2 a.m., defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 256, a certain village in a certain town in a certain county. Defendant Yu stood lookout at the main entrance while defendant Zhang climbed over the wall to enter the courtyard and used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 101 of Ke. They stole a Huanyu MG500 mobile phone (valued at 283 RMB). 3. On November 12, 2015, at around 3 a.m., defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 568, Xitou Village, a certain town in a certain county. Defendant Yu stood lookout at the alley entrance while defendant Zhang used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 101 of a person named Zhang. They stole clothing and trousers placed by the bedside, searched through them, and then discarded them by the roadside outside. These items were later retrieved by Zhang. On January 19, 2016, defendants Zhang and Yu were apprehended by public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Yu during the trial. The case is corroborated by statements from victims Li, Ke, and Zhang; testimonies from witnesses Guo, Ge, and Liu; on-site inspection records; identification records; photographs; seizure decision documents; receipts; price appraisal reports; administrative penalty decisions; community drug rehabilitation orders; criminal judgment documents; certificates of release after serving sentences; and demographic information sheets. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the charges.


After examination, it was found that the defendants Luo and Li were originally employees of Futaihua Industrial (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.'s CSD Product Manufacturing Department (responsible for after-sales maintenance) under Foxconn Guanlan. Luo was the production line leader of the workshop, responsible for counting the overdue backlogged motherboards in the workshop and testing aspects such as temperature and color rendering. Li was the overdue backlog specialist of the same workshop assembly line, responsible for taking the overdue backlogged motherboards into the repair room for replacement. On February 11, 2014, defendants Luo and Li conspired to exploit management loopholes in the company to steal iPhone 4 motherboards from their factory workshop by using fake replacements. On February 13, 2014, around 10:00 AM, Luo prepared and purchased 60 fake iPhone 4 motherboards (costing 3,600 yuan) and handed them over to employee Li in the corner of the workshop. Li took advantage of that day's opportunity as there were many abnormally backlogged motherboards on the production line and replacement was relatively smooth, and exchanged the fake motherboards for 60 genuine iPhone 4 motherboards under the pretext of the devices not powering up, handing over the genuine motherboards to Luo. Afterwards, Luo sold the 60 genuine motherboards for a profit of 20,000 yuan, with Li receiving 6,500 yuan and Luo receiving 13,500 yuan. According to the victim company's quotation, the unit price of each motherboard is 388.71 yuan, and the motherboards involved in the case amount to a total of 23,322.60 yuan. On April 10, 2014, defendant Li was arrested; on May 10, 2014, defendant Luo voluntarily surrendered to the police. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Li during the trial, and are supported by related evidence verified during the trial, which is sufficient to confirm them. Regarding the civil compensation part of this case, under the mediation hosted by this court, defendant Luo compensated the victim unit with 22,000 yuan, and Li compensated with 14,500 yuan, with the relevant payments made by the defendants' families. The victim unit forgave the two defendants.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that on January 7, 2019, at approximately 6:38 am, the defendant Li was driving a small sedan with the license plate XXX, traveling north on the high-level road from south. Upon reaching a village intersection, he collided with pedestrian Niu, who was crossing the road from east to west, causing Niu to fall onto the road. After getting out of the car to assess the situation, Li did not move the injured party to a safe location and immediately drove away from the accident scene. Later, the defendant Wu, driving another small sedan with the license plate XXX in the same direction, collided with Niu, who was half-sitting on the road from the previous accident. After checking the situation, Wu fled the scene. Subsequently, vehicles driven by Shan and Li1, who were traveling in the same direction, ran over Niu and left the accident scene, leading to Niu's death due to the traffic accident. Wang, driving another small sedan with the license plate XXX, passed the accident scene. According to the appraisal: Niu died from craniocerebral injury combined with chest and abdominal organ damage accompanied by traumatic shock. The Traffic Police Brigade No. 3, under the Public Security Bureau of the city, determined: Li bore the main responsibility for the accident; Wu bore the main responsibility; Shan bore secondary responsibility; Li1 bore secondary responsibility; Wang and Niu bore no responsibility. The prosecuting authority presented related


Upon trial, it was found that on November 25, 2013, at approximately 02:00, the defendants Liu, Zhao, and the criminal suspects "Hei Gui" and Huang (the latter two's specific information is unknown and are handled in separate cases) arrived by car at the Xiaoxiangyuan Restaurant on Gongming Street, Guangming District, of a certain city, after premeditation. They pried open the lock of the restaurant door and entered to steal one 55-inch Konka LCD TV, six 37-inch Skyworth LCD TVs, two computer hosts, and more than 300 yuan in cash before fleeing the scene by car. The four later sold the stolen goods and shared the proceeds. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen six Skyworth TVs was 7,992 yuan RMB, and the prices of other items could not be appraised. On December 5, 2013, after investigation, the public security organs arrested defendant Zhao at a certain location. With Zhao's cooperation, they subsequently arrested defendant Liu and seized a hydraulic cutter, a large pair of scissors, and a screwdriver. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Liu and Zhao during the trial, and there is relevant evidence that has been verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the evening of August 5, 2020, the defendant Zhang received a text message from drug user Wu to purchase drugs. He discussed with defendants Ling and Sheng about obtaining drugs for sale. After receiving a 500 yuan WeChat transfer from Wu, Zhang paid Sheng 300 yuan to purchase drugs, and Zhang and Ling each took a share of 100 yuan from the remaining 200 yuan. Around 9 p.m. that evening, defendant Sheng obtained two tablets of methamphetamine (commonly known as "magu") and a small bag of methamphetamine (ice) from "Big Brother" (identity details unknown, not present in the case) and handed them over to Zhang. Zhang felt the ice was insufficient, so Ling gave Zhang approximately 0.2 grams of his own ice. After receiving an additional 50 yuan "travel fee" via WeChat transfer from Wu, Zhang hurried to a certain parking lot in a specific district of the city to transact drugs with Wu, where he was caught by investigators. The police lawfully seized 1.5 red round tablets (net weight 0.15 grams) and a bag of white crystals (net weight 0.39 grams) from Zhang. According to the forensic identification by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of a city’s Public Security Bureau, the seized red round tablets and white crystalline substances were found to contain methamphetamine components. After Zhang came into custody, he cooperated with the public security agency in arresting accomplices Ling and Sheng. Upon arrest, the three defendants voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their criminal facts. It was also found that defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng confessed and accepted punishment at the investigative agency, and during the review and prosecution period, they voluntarily confessed and accepted punishment, signing a confession and punishment agreement with the assistance of duty lawyers. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng during the court trial. They are supported by evidence including demographic information, the case detection process, inspection transcripts, a list of seized items, drug photos, weigh-in records of suspected drugs, sampling records, WeChat transfer records, confession and punishment agreements, statements and defenses of defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng, physical evidence test reports, and identification transcripts, which are sufficient to establish the case.


Based on the trial findings, on March 27, 2016, around 20:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district of a city. They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a white Yongjiu brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Jia, which was parked there (valued at 2160 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 7 of the same year, around 18:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a supermarket at Lotz Plaza, Shiqi Street, in a certain district (currently a certain supermarket). They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a red Philips brand electric bicycle and a blue Mulan brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Yi, which were parked there (valued at 700 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 20 of the same year, around 19:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district. They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a green Huanqiao brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Cheng, which was parked there (valued at 400 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 28 of the same year, around 23:00, the defendants Zou and Yu were discovered and apprehended by patrol officers while stealing a black electric bicycle at the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district.

The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Zou and Yu during the court trial. Additionally, they are confirmed by the statements of the victims Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and Cheng, as well as the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Yin, identification records and photos, the valuation report from the Price Appraisal Center of a certain district, the circumstances of the arrest, explanatory notes, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution charges that on June 17, 2015, at around 4 a.m., the defendants Tang and Zhao, after premeditation, went to the courtyard below Building No. 8, Liuhe Road, Qixing Village, Qixing District of a certain city. Tang used a key he was carrying to unlock and steal a black Hanling brand electric bike, which Yang had parked in the courtyard. This vehicle was stolen property belonging to Fu, valued at 986 RMB according to an appraisal. Tang then waited with the vehicle, while Zhao entered the room on the first floor of Building No. 8, where Yang's mother lived, and stole a black Sansui television, valued at 684 RMB according to an appraisal. After committing the theft, they fled the scene and were apprehended by the police near Dongjiang Primary School in Qixing District. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Tang and Zhao during the trial. There is additional evidence including Zhao's household registration certificate, the details of their capture, purchase receipts for the stolen items, criminal judgments from Qixing District People's Court under references (2013) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 112, (2013) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 162, and (2014) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 254, a release certificate, the victims Yang and Fu's reports and statements, confessions from defendants Tang and Zhao, a valuation report from the municipal pricing center regarding the items involved under reference (2015) 7-3, a notification of appraisal opinions, site identification records and photos of the crime scene and stolen goods by both defendants, a record and photos of Tang identifying Zhao, a scene layout plan, a seizure list, and a return list. This evidence is sufficient to establish the charges.


The prosecution alleges: 1. On February 22, 2014, at approximately 11 p.m., defendants Yuan and Wang, along with Zhang, Tan, and Chen (the latter three to be tried in separate cases), conspired to find a passerby to assault and rob of some property. Later, Yuan, Wang, and the others followed the victims Huang and Xu (both minors) to the east side of a certain building in Hecheng Subdistrict, a district of a certain city, and attacked Huang and Xu with fists, feet, and wooden sticks, robbing Huang of a Balong BL-A10D mobile phone (valued at 441 RMB). Subsequently, Yuan, Wang, and the other three fled the scene and handed the stolen goods to Chen to sell. Chen sold the goods for 100 RMB and kept the proceeds for himself. After the case was solved, the police recovered the stolen goods and returned them to the victims, but the money Chen obtained had already been spent and could not be recovered. In court, the prosecution provided the confessions and defenses of defendants Yuan and Wang, identification records, statements from the victims Huang and Xu, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Chen, Li, and another person named Li, Price Appraisal Conclusion Document No. (2014)00089 concerning the involved property, a forensic medical assessment document from Fo [a certain bureau] No. (2014)072 on the degree of human injury, household registration certificates of the defendants and victims Huang and Xu, a detention order, a list of seized items and photos, a report on the arrest process, and an explanation issued by Hecheng Police Station, Gaoming Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, among other evidence.


The People’s Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on March 2, 2014, at around 16:00, the defendants Lin and He went to the intersection of Zhongnan Road and Qianwei Road in Laibin City. He blocked the victim Zeng’s view while Lin used tweezers to reach into the right pocket of Zeng's clothing from behind and clipped out a black OPPO brand bar touchscreen cellphone. After Lin and He successfully stole the phone, they were caught on the spot by the police. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen cellphone was 3,298 RMB. To support the charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence to the court.


The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charges: At around 0:30 on August 21, 2015, defendants Wang and Yu, along with others, were singing in room B08 on the second floor of Mango KTV on Yuhe Road in Kuiwen District after drinking alcohol. Due to a conflict between Wang and another person, he had Yu call Zhuang and Han to the scene. After the defendants Zhuang and Han arrived under the influence of alcohol, Han unreasonably smashed items such as the lottery stand and computer monitors at the entrance of the store’s supermarket. Subsequently, the defendants Zhuang, Wang, Yu, and Han unreasonably assaulted Mango KTV manager Liu and supervisor Lu, resulting in soft tissue contusions for both injured parties. According to an assessment, the injuries of victims Liu and Lu were classified as minor injuries. Following the incident, defendant Han compensated Mango KTV with 20,000 yuan, after which Mango KTV no longer pursued legal action against him and applied for a lenient treatment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the court hearing and are substantiated with documentary evidence such as arrest and case-solving reports, household registration certificates, telephone records, criminal judgments from a certain city's district People's Court (2010) Criminal First Instance No. 42, (2014) Criminal First Instance No. 19, and the High-tech Industrial Development Zone People's Court (2015) Criminal First Instance No. 15, and applications; statements from victims Liu and Lu; forensic evaluation reports from the Criminal Science and Technology Office of the Kuiwen Branch of the Public Security Bureau (Weifang) Public (Kui) Forensic (Injury) Certificate No. 290, 291 of 2015; identification records, on-site inspection records, audio-visual materials, and on-site surveillance videos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


After trial, it was ascertained: On January 10, 2017, at around 19:00, defendants Zhu and Wu rode a motorcycle, carrying tools such as a headlamp, music player, small net, and rubber band, to Jingting Village, Jinji Town, Tianchang City, in the Jinzhang Team. In three ponds belonging to the Jinzhang Team, they illegally hunted 20 wild birds. That evening, defendants Zhu and Wu were apprehended by public security authorities. Following the incident, an assessment conducted by the Dongying Branch of the State Forestry Administration's Forensic Authentication Center for Forest Public Security, determined that the birds captured were Moorhens, which are terrestrial wild animals protected by the state due to their significant ecological, scientific, and social value, classified as "three have" animals. On January 12, 2017, the 20 Moorhens (alive) were released. The defendants Zhu and Wu raised no objection to the above facts during the trial, which were corroborated by evidence such as identification records, site photos, on-site investigation records, site location maps, seizure lists and photos, appraisal reports, the Tianchang Municipal Government's announcement prohibiting the hunting of wild animals within the city, case transfer notifications, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decisions, household registration information, explanations on the handling of the birds involved, explanations on the situation of arrival, and statements from defendants Zhu and Wu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the evening of December 12, 2016, the defendant Zhang drove a van with the license plate Su H×××××, in collusion with the defendants Dong and Yang, to San Zhong Road in a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to steal cable. The defendant Yang used pliers to cut the cables of China Mobile Tietong Co., Ltd.'s Huaian branch located near San Zhong Road. The defendants Zhang and Dong wound up the cut cables and loaded them onto the vehicle. The three defendants stole a total of 270 meters of cable. That same evening, the defendants Zhang, Dong, and Yang sold the stolen cables to Zhang1 (handled in a separate case), who runs a scrap recycling station, for more than 6,100 RMB. Each of the defendants Zhang, Yang, and Dong received 2,000 RMB. The appraisal determined the stolen cables were valued at 7,871 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang was apprehended on January 23, 2017. After being brought to justice, he truthfully confessed to the crime and successfully persuaded Yang and Dong to voluntarily surrender by phone. Defendants Yang and Dong voluntarily surrendered on January 23, 2017, and January 24, 2017, respectively, and truthfully confessed to the crime. Furthermore, during the trial at this court, defendants Zhang, Yang, and Dong have already returned all the stolen funds. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Zhang, and Dong during the court hearings and were substantiated by the statements of the victims Zhou, Jin, and Li, the written testimonies of the absentee witnesses Tang and Zhang1, the price assessment conclusion provided by the Price Certification Branch of the District Price Bureau, recognizance records, the criminal judgment, the case report, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of the Guangxi Autonomous Region charges that: On August 30, 2014, at around 5 p.m., defendants Peng and Luo, after conspiring, with Luo registering a room, number 803, at a hotel on a certain street in a certain district of a certain city, using the identity of "Feng", and with Peng inviting the victim, Chen, into the room, fabricated an identity situation to gain Chen's trust. Subsequently, Peng and Luo pretended to play poker and gamble. After Peng intentionally lost money to Luo, Peng, on the pretense of borrowing money from Chen to continue gambling, deceived Chen out of 20,000 yuan in cash, after which both Peng and Luo fled the scene. The illicit gains were squandered jointly. Following the victim's report, on September 23, 2014, the public security organ apprehended defendant Peng on train K849. Through an online wanted notice, on October 12, 2014, at around 6 p.m., the public security organ apprehended defendant Luo at a certain location in Liunan District of a certain city. After the incident, Peng's family compensated the victim for the economic loss of 20,000 yuan and obtained the victim's understanding. Regarding the above facts, defendants Peng and Luo raised no objections during the trial, and the following evidence was presented in court, verified, and confirmed: the case registration form, the case filing decision, the confessions of defendants Peng and Luo, the statement of victim Chen, the identification record by victim Chen, the identification records and photos pointed out by defendants Peng and Luo, the evidence retrieval list, the hotel accommodation settlement slip, the guest accommodation registration form, the delivery slip, the history detail list of the Peony Ling Tong Card account, the process of arrest and apprehension, the receipt, the letter of understanding, and the household registration certificates of defendants Peng and Luo.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the night of March 4, 2017, Wu (full name unknown) had an argument with Chen over trivial matters, after which Wu informed her boyfriend Liu. On March 5 of the same year, defendants Liu, Gao, and Hu A (dealt with in a separate case), among others, decided to go to the "Qinyuan" foot massage located on Jiangyuan Street in the Duting Subdistrict Office of Lichuan City to cause trouble for Chen. Since Chen was not present at the shop, they called the victims Xiong and Xiang to handle the matter. After Xiong and Xiang arrived at the shop, an altercation ensued with Liu, Gao, and Hu, which led to both parties physically assaulting each other. Defendant Liu took a kitchen knife from the "Zhijian" duck restaurant kitchen and struck Xiang on the left side of the waist, while Gao drove a car into Xiong, knocking him to the ground. According to the assessment, Xiang's injuries were classified as second-degree minor injuries, and Xiong's injuries were classified as slight injuries. It was further found that during the trial, with mediation hosted by the People's Mediation Committee of the Duting Subdistrict Office in Lichuan City, defendants Liu and Gao reached a mediation agreement with victims Xiong and Xiang. Liu compensated Xiang for a total of 50,000 RMB for various economic losses, and Gao compensated Xiong for a total of 10,000 RMB for various economic losses. Both victims issued letters of understanding, forgiving the two defendants. The above facts, to which defendants Liu and Gao raised no objections during the trial, are substantiated by documentary evidence; witness testimony; victim statements, expert opinions; site inspection records, and confessions and defense statements by the defendants, which are sufficient for the conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On April 19, 2011, at around 11 PM, Zuo and others went to the Xinghuabang Yimen Mutton Soup Restaurant in Group 3 of a certain village in Liangzhu Town, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City. They demanded a benefit fee of 500 yuan from the restaurant owner, Feng, and after being refused, they stirred up trouble, which led to them being chased and attacked by Feng's side. Zuo called for help from fellow townspeople. Defendants Cao, Xia, as well as He, Hu B, Ji (all of whom have been sentenced) and others, upon hearing the news, arrived at the scene with sticks, shovels, and other implements to participate in the fight. Defendant Cao kicked the rolling shutter door of the mutton soup restaurant and, together with Xia, He, Hu B, and others, chased and attacked the victims Feng and Suo, causing multiple external injuries to their bodies, and also accidentally injuring passers-by Hu A and Zhou. Defendant Cao also accidentally struck Chen with a wooden stick. According to forensic evaluation by the Yuhang District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau: the injuries to victim Feng constitute minor injuries, and the injuries to victim Suo constitute slight injuries. After the incident, the relatives of He and Hu B reached a compensation agreement with the victims and have already paid the compensation. The evidence used for the charges includes the victim's statements, witness testimonies, a list of seized items, forensic injury assessment reports, on-site inspection records, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants and co-perpetrators.


The prosecution alleges: On December 10, 2015, at around 20:20, the defendant Qin arranged for the defendant Liu to sell to Yang 10 tablets of methamphetamine (commonly known as "magu," with a net weight of 0.84 grams) and a bag of methamphetamine (commonly known as "ice," with a net weight of 0.22 grams) in the corridor of the third floor of the Xinya Hotel on Hongda Road in this city, for 500 yuan in drug money. After the transaction, Liu and Qin were immediately apprehended by police officers. The prosecution submitted to this court evidence including witness testimonies accusing the defendants Qin and Liu of committing the crime of x; records of the arrest, drug weighing records, call logs, on-site test reports, identification transcripts; appraisal reports; household registration information and confessions and defenses of the defendants Qin and Liu.


After the trial, it was found: On a day in mid-October 2012, at around 1 a.m., the defendant Yang took advantage of his convenience working at a club in Nanxun Town, Nanxun District of this city, and stole the master key to the club's lockers from the cash register. Later, with Wang (handled in a separate case) acting as a lookout, the defendant Yang used the key to open the locker door and stole 3,500 RMB in cash from the victim Ding stored in the locker. Subsequently, the defendant Yang received 2,500 RMB, and Wang received 1,000 RMB. On December 23, 2012, around 10 p.m., the defendant Yang contacted the defendant Wang by phone to commit theft and provided the master key to the lockers to the defendant Wang. Yang acted as a lookout while Wang used the key to open the locker door and stole the 20,000 RMB cash placed by the victim Zhang in the locker. Thereafter, the defendant Yang received 11,900 RMB, and the defendant Wang received 8,100 RMB. In summary, the defendant Yang was involved in two thefts, totaling 23,500 RMB, and the defendant Wang was involved in one theft, totaling 20,000 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Wang during the court trial and were corroborated by Wang's confession in the same case, statements from the victims Ding and Zhang, testimonies from witnesses Xia and He, an administrative penalty decision, identification records and photos, on-site investigation records, details of the arrest process, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The prosecution charges: From December 2012 to February 2013, the defendant Hu, along with others (identities unknown), placed a gambling machine capable of serving six people simultaneously (commonly known as a "little fish machine") in their own discount supermarket in a certain town for others to gamble. During this period, minors were also involved in gambling. Hu and her husband Wang jointly operated and managed the machine, making a total profit of over 10,000 yuan, of which defendants Hu and Wang each received over 4,000 yuan. It was further found that the two defendants voluntarily surrendered to the Xinmaqiao Police Station of Guzhen County Public Security Bureau on February 20, 2014, and returned the illegal gains of 4,000 yuan to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial and are corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Guo and Zhang, among others, the criminal case on-site investigation and inspection records from the Guzhen County Public Security Bureau, site diagrams, on-site photos, identification records, household registration certificates, explanatory notes, and evidence of the incident and arrest process, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The prosecution alleges that on the evening of March 5, 2015, defendants Xu and Huang, along with others, had a dispute with the victim Xing and others over a toast at the "To Youth" bar in Wanda Plaza, Wanzhou District, a certain city. The parties intended to fight but were dissuaded by the bar owner. Subsequently, around midnight on March 6, defendants Xu and Huang invited "Er Tong" and others to join them in carrying knives to find victims Xing and others near the "Wuxi Specialty Products" storefront at 262 Beishan Road, Wanzhou District, the city in question. Xing, Gong, and others sensed danger and hid in the alley beside the "Wuxi Specialty Products" storefront, closing the rolling door. Defendant Huang drove an off-road motorcycle to crash open the rolling door. Defendants Xu, Huang, and others brought a case of empty beer bottles from the "Good K" barbecue place and threw them at Xing and others, injuring Xing's face. According to the assessment, the injury sustained by victim Xing is classified as minor injury level two.


Upon trial, it was found that at around 10 a.m. on March 26, 2014, the defendants Wu and Peng rode a motorcycle to the vicinity of the "Zhonghai City Garden" residential area on Qianjiang Road in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain city. Defendant Wu drove the motorcycle close to pedestrian Nie, while defendant Peng, sitting on the back seat of the motorcycle, grabbed a "Honggu" brand blue satchel from Nie when he was off guard. The bag contained an Apple 4S phone valued at 2,162 yuan and 6,500 yuan in cash. After the crime, the blue satchel was recovered and returned to Nie. It was also found that Wu's family had compensated the victim Nie with 10,000 yuan in cash on Wu's behalf, and obtained Nie's forgiveness. Both defendants raised no objections during the trial and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. During the trial, Wu's defender presented the following arguments: 1. Defendant Wu was an accomplice in the joint crime; 2. Defendant Wu demonstrated a good attitude towards admitting guilt. It is suggested that the court should consider lenient punishment. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence, including the household registration certificates of the two defendants and their confessions at the public security agency, photos of the crime tools, the victim Nie's statement, the on-site identification record, search records, a list of seized and returned items, the appraisal conclusion of the value of the involved items, Peng's past criminal records, and the arrest process provided by the public security agency, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that the defendants, Chen and Xia, conspired with Ding and Li (both at large) to steal crude oil from the Second Mine of the Eighth Oil Extraction Plant by drilling holes and installing valves to damage the oil pipeline. On the nights of September 2 and 3, 2020, the aforementioned four individuals twice drilled holes and installed valves on the main oil return pipeline outside the Fourth Oil Extraction Team of the Second Mine of the Eighth Oil Extraction Plant within the jurisdiction of a town in a certain city. They attached a clamp to the oil pipeline, opened the ball valve, and drilled through the pipeline before leaving. Around 21:00 on September 7, the four conspiring with Ke (whose identity is yet to be verified) returned to the location of the installed valve to steal crude oil again. Defendant Xia was responsible for filling oil bags, Chen and Ke were responsible for loading the vehicle, while Ding and Li were responsible for transporting the 20 bags of stolen crude oil away from the scene. Chen and Xia were caught at the theft site by oilfield security personnel and were handed over to the public security authorities. A total of 21 bags of crude oil were seized on-site, with 20 bags being transported away; each bag weighed approximately 50 kilograms, totaling about 2 tons of crude oil valued at over 5,000 yuan.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city, Hunan Province charges: On April 16, 2015, at around 16:00, the defendants Xu and Ding, after conspiring, went to the vicinity of the bus stop opposite Emerald Bay in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Xu took the opportunity while the victim, Yang Mouyi, was walking unprepared and snatched away a gold necklace weighing 17.895 grams worth 5,100 yuan from around Yang's neck. They then fled the scene on a motorcycle driven by defendant Ding, who was waiting nearby. It was further found that the injuries suffered by the victim, Yang Mouyi, were assessed as minor injuries. The defendants Xu and Ding raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings. The facts are substantiated by documentary evidence including household registration certificates, arrest records, seizure warrants, seized items, inventory lists, a jewelry quality guarantee from Zhang Moumou, the criminal judgment of this court (2012) Huaihe Criminal Preliminary No. 220, the criminal judgment of Hangzhou Xiaoshan District People's Court (2007) Xiaoxingchu No. 1419, the testimony of witness Yang Moujia (a minor), the victim Yang Mouyi's statement, the defendants Xu and Ding's confessions and defenses, the forensic evaluation opinion on human injury degree by the public security bureau of a certain city, the price assessment opinion by a certain city Hecheng Price Certification Center, extraction records, inspection records, on-site identification records, on-site survey records, on-site layout sketches, and photos, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.


The prosecution charged: From the end of 2014 to February 2015, "Boss Lin" (handled in a separate case) employed the defendants Wen, Zhuang, Zhan, and Chen in a logistics warehouse located at 41-43, East Block, 1st Floor, Lianhe Street, Chang'an Street, in a certain district of a certain city, to jointly engage in the illegal transportation, packaging, handling, and sales of cigarettes branded exclusively for export, without obtaining the "Special Tobacco Monopoly Business Enterprise License" from the tobacco monopoly department. Defendant Wen was responsible for driving vehicles for transportation; defendants Zhuang, Zhan, and Chen were responsible for packaging, handling, and accompanying the vehicles. On the afternoon of February 5, 2015, the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Brigade of the Sub-Bureau of a certain city's Public Security Bureau and the city’s Tobacco Monopoly Bureau inspectors seized the aforementioned warehouse. They confiscated on site 2,468 cartons of Yellow Crane Tower brand cigarettes (soft pack), 449 cartons of Yunyan brand cigarettes (soft pack), 1,149 cartons of Double Happiness brand cigarettes (hard pack), 4,125 cartons of Hongtashan brand (Gold) cigarettes (hard pack), and 899 cartons of Hongtashan brand cigarettes (hard pack). (According to identification, all the aforementioned seized cigarettes are export-only brands and are genuine, with a total value of RMB 1,114,434) as well as three vehicles involved in the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that: On October 15, 2011, at around 12:00 PM, defendants Ye and Gao, at the entrance of Unit 4, Building 27, Kaiyuan Community, Jiaochuan Street, in this district, used means such as pushing a cart to steal a "Lvyuan" brand TDP0412Z model electric bicycle parked there by the victim Lü, valued at 960 RMB. On October 24, 2011, at around 4:00 PM, defendants Ye and Gao, together with Li A (handled in a separate case), near the Xingshan Vehicle Advertising Sign on the east side of Yufan East Road, Jiaochuan Street in this district, used the aforementioned methods to steal a "Jinan Qingqi" brand electric bicycle parked there by Hou, valued at 1960 RMB. After the crime, the public security organs recovered the aforementioned "Jinan Qingqi" brand electric bicycle. Defendants Ye and Gao compensated a total of 960 RMB, and the stolen property was returned to the victims. During the court trial, defendants Ye and Gao had no objection to the aforementioned facts, which were also corroborated by documentary evidence such as the identity proof of the defendants, the process of their arrest, explanatory notes, stolen property reports, temporary detention receipts, temporary item detention receipts, the return of items, document lists, photo descriptions, criminal judgment documents, release certificates, administrative punishment decisions, identification transcripts, witness testimonies of Hou and Li, victim Lü's statement, the confession of co-defendant Li A, and the price appraisal conclusion, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on October 4, 2013, defendants Cao and Zhao, in order to collect a debt, drove a white van and illegally restricted the personal freedom of a person named Li for approximately 17 hours. They handcuffed Li in the vehicle. At around 5 p.m. the following day, the two defendants released Li at Hongnan Society Bridge in this city. The prosecution presented to the court evidence such as the victim's statement and report materials, documentary evidence, witness testimony, and the confessions of the defendants to support the above allegations.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: In the mid to late June of 2016, after defendants Wu and Zhang conspired together, they repeatedly organized gambling activities using "Tong Bao" gambling apparatus in the kitchens of the houses of Ye's family at No. 54 Guoxiliao, a certain village in a certain town of a certain city, and Chen's family in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city. Through these activities, Wu gained more than 700 RMB in profits, and Zhang gained 1,100 RMB. On June 28, 2016, the public security bureau of the city raided the casino, lawfully seizing 13,985 RMB in gambling funds and one "Tong Bao" gambling apparatus. On the same day, June 28, 2016, defendants Wu and Zhang were captured by police officers. The illicit funds of 10,172 RMB seized from Wu and Zhang and one "Tong Bao" gambling apparatus were not transferred with the case. During court proceedings, defendants Wu and Zhang did not object to the above facts, which are further validated by the following evidence presented and cross-examined by the prosecuting agency and confirmed for legality, authenticity, and relevance by this court: 1. Testimonies of witnesses Xu, Xiao, Liao, Su, Yang, Chen, Ye, among others; 2. Inspection records, evidence preservation orders, evidence preservation inventory lists, photographs of the seized scene and items; 3. Documentary evidence including household registration certificates, basic personnel information, records of the case progress, illegal and criminal history investigation forms, administrative penalty decisions, and lists of confiscated items; 4. Identification records, on-site identification records, and photographs; 5. Confessions of defendants Wu and Zhang. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient to establish guilt.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on March 31, 2017, the defendant Song, through the mediation of the defendant Jia, sold 5 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Zhou for a price of 3,000 yuan, making a profit from it. In support of the above accusation, the prosecution provided evidence such as witness testimony, identification records, documentary evidence, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.


The prosecution charges that on December 23, 2015, at around 11 a.m., the defendants Liu and Xie took advantage of a moment when no one was paying attention to steal 3,000 yuan in cash from the pocket of a coat belonging to the victim, He, which was placed on the back of a chair in the lobby of the Crescent Restaurant at Hexin Plaza, Shishan Town, in a particular district of a certain city. Liu was responsible for pretending to be a customer sipping tea, approaching the victim, and stealing the property, while Xie was responsible for acting as a lookout at the restaurant entrance. On January 22, 2016, the police arrested Liu and Xie at the aforementioned restaurant. In support of the charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence in court, proving that the actions of both defendants violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for X crime. Since both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes, they should be punished according to Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The defendants did not object to the prosecution's charges. After trial, it was found that the prosecution's charges against Liu and Xie for theft were clear, with definitive and sufficient evidence, which is confirmed by this court.


After hearing the case, it was found that: On the afternoon of January 31, 2015, defendants Luo and Guo, in order to raise funds for drugs, traveled by coach from a town in a certain city to a certain district to look for opportunities to steal a motorcycle. At about 9:40 PM that night, the two defendants came out from the "Horizon" Internet cafe located on Jiaotong Road in Jianchang Town, a certain county, and noticed a red Guowei brand men's motorcycle belonging to the victim He parked at the entrance. The two defendants then used a key to unlock the ground lock of the motorcycle, broke the handle lock, pushed the motorcycle to a nearby residential area, connected the power line, started the motorcycle, and rode it back to a certain town. Afterwards, the two defendants sold the motorcycle and divided the proceeds equally. According to the appraisal, the stolen Guowei brand motorcycle was valued at 3,485 RMB. On September 18, 2015, during the investigation of He's stolen motorcycle case, the criminal investigation brigade of a certain county's public security bureau found that Luo, who was serving a sentence in a county detention center, and Guo, who was serving a sentence in a city detention center, were suspected in the case, and lawfully detained the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo and Guo during the court hearing, and were supported by the confessions and defenses of the two defendants; the statement of the victim He; the testimony of witness Tu; the appraisal opinion; surveillance video; identification records and video screenshots; the course of the case, household registration certificates, criminal judgment, and motorcycle sales receipts, which were sufficient to establish the facts.


The People's Procuratorate of Tianhe District in a certain city charged that defendants Wu and Zhang, in order to obtain illegal profits, collaborated with others to manufacture and process counterfeit and substandard cigarettes of brands such as "Yuxi" and "Huanghelou" without the permission of the registered trademark owners. This occurred at No. 104, 33 Wuxianqiao Zhijie, Tianhe District. On June 13, 2013, Wu and Zhang were caught red-handed at the aforementioned location. Seized at the scene were 149 cartons of soft-pack Yuxi cigarettes, 19 cartons of soft-pack Huanghelou (Lundao) cigarettes, 5 cartons of hard-pack Huanghelou (Mantianyou) cigarettes, 10,000 Yuxi brand cigarettes, 10,000 Yunyan brand cigarettes (all appraised as counterfeit registered trademark products and substandard cigarettes, with a total value of 54,608 RMB), along with tools used for the crime including one simple sealing machine, three electric irons, and two square wooden blocks.


The prosecution alleges that defendants Xu and Han, together with Mao (who has been approved for arrest and is on the run) and "Yao" (who is absconding with a case against them), conspired to defraud through marriage. In September 2012, they defrauded Gao of cash and goods amounting to 33,827 yuan and provided related evidence.


The prosecution charges that the Xiaomi letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 8911270, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from July 7, 2012, to July 6, 2022. The VIVO letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 9773708, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from September 21, 2012, to September 20, 2022. The HUAWEI letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 4924862, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from September 7, 2008, to September 6, 2018. Yu Jiashan (handled in a separate case) established Bada Century Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain city on May 14, 2014, leasing the 6th floor of Building F, 10 Hua Feng Technology Park, Tangwei Community, Fuyong Street, Bao'an District, as a factory, organizing workers to produce counterfeit mobile phone screen assemblies with trademarks such as Xiaomi, BBK, and Huawei. Defendant Chen served as the factory director and defendant Lu as the finance director at the company. At around 16:00 on November 19, 2015, the police conducted a raid on the 6th floor of Building F, 10 Hua Feng Technology Park, Bada Century Technology Co., Ltd., at Fuyong Street, Bao'an District. In the company's office financial room, they seized 550 pieces of Huawei "HUAWEI" mobile phone touch screens (TP). Subsequently, the police seized 3,750 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (assembly) with Xiaomi logo, 2,465 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), 847 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (assembly) with VIVO logo, 248 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), 263 pieces of mobile phone touch screens assembly with Huawei "HUAWEI" logo, 650 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), and 42 account books in a warehouse in room 3, first floor, Building 4, Hua Feng Technology Park. On the same day, Chen and Lu were arrested. An appraisal determined that the involved mobile phone screen assemblies were valued at 1,983,267 RMB.


Upon trial, it was found that on February 1, 2014, defendants Qian and Dan, after prior consultation and with the purpose of illegal profit, engaged in gambling activities. Defendant Dan was responsible for renting the venue and purchasing gambling supplies, while defendant Qian handled daily management. They organized multiple participants, including Yu, Kong, Chen Jia, and Liao, among others, to gamble using "dianqiao" method in a warehouse at the entrance of a village in a town of a district in a certain city. During these gambling activities, Qian and Dan took commissions in the form of "500 yuan from every 10,000 yuan won," organizing gambling sessions dozens of times. On March 8, 2014, defendant Dan withdrew from the cooperation, by which time the two defendants had gained illegal profits amounting to over RMB 13,000. On March 12, 2014, at around 21:00, defendants Qian and Dan were apprehended on site by police in a warehouse at the entrance of a village in a town of a district in a certain city. After the incident, the stolen funds were recovered. It is also found that defendant Qian had previously been detained for three days by a district branch of a city police department for gambling on January 18, 2010. Defendant Dan was fined RMB 500 by Jinghu branch of a city police department for gambling on December 13, 2011, and had been administratively detained for gambling by Jinghu branch on August 23, 2012. These facts were undisputed by defendants Qian and Dan during the court hearing and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Xu, Liao, Yu, Xue, Tu, Kong, Chen Jia, Zhang, Chen Yi, inspection records, evidence preservation lists, seizure lists, situation statements, recovery item lists, identification records and photos, administrative penalty decision documents, arrest explanations, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: On November 10, 2015, at approximately 4:00 PM, defendant Li, with the assistance of defendant Lu, contacted drug buyer Ye. They agreed to conduct a drug transaction in front of the Bridal Embroidery Boutique on Renmin Third Road, Xinan Street, Sanshui District, Foshan City. Subsequently, drug buyer Ye transferred 135 RMB as drug money through Alipay to defendant Lu's Alipay account, and defendant Lu then transferred 125 RMB to defendant Li's Alipay account. Following this, defendant Li went to the agreed location and sold one packet of methamphetamine to drug buyer Ye. After the transaction was completed, both individuals were apprehended by the police with the evidence in hand, and one packet of methamphetamine, weighing 0.36 grams, was confiscated from drug buyer Ye. On the same day, at approximately 9:00 PM, the police arrested defendant Lu near the Yunxiu Market on Xinan Street, Sanshui District, Foshan City. Accordingly, the prosecution recommended that the court sentence defendants Li and Lu to imprisonment for a term of more than six months but less than one year, along with a fine, for the crime of x. Defendant Li and Lu did not raise any objections during the court hearings, and the facts were substantiated by the prosecution's evidence, including the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Lu, the testimony of witness Ye, identification records, the administrative penalty decision, on-site test reports, seizure decision and inventory, photographs, phone inspection reports, call record lists, criminal examination reports, on-site inspection records, criminal history checks, arrest details, household registration documents, case registration form, and case filing decision. The court hereby confirms these findings.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: On July 20, 2018, at around 1 a.m., at the 3rd floor of Wealthport, Xincheng District, a certain place, at Domain Shang International Catering, the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, Yu, and others, after drinking, caused a disturbance in the hallway. When the victims, Zhang and Yang, went over to stop them, the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, and Yu injured victim Zhang, causing three of Zhang’s front teeth to fall out and a nasal bone fracture. According to the forensic identification by the First Hospital of a certain place, Zhang's dental injuries were classified as minor injuries of level two, and the nasal bone injury as minor. After the incident, the families of defendants Kong, Zhao, and Yu actively compensated victim Zhang, and Zhang forgave Kong, Zhao, and Yu. On March 18, 2019, defendant Yu voluntarily surrendered to the police. In response to the aforementioned accusations, the prosecuting agency presented and read out documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, identification records, audiovisual materials, and other evidence in court. The prosecution believes that the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, and Yu, without cause, attacked others in a public place, causing victim Zhang's dental injury to be classified as minor injury level two and the nasal bone injury as minor, which constitutes a grave offense. Their conduct violates Article X, Item (1) of the Crimin


The People's Procuratorate of the Gangbei District of a certain city charged that in mid-March 2015, defendants Huang and Tang, after prior discussion, jointly funded the purchase of five slot machines with gambling functions online. In late March, Huang and Tang placed the slot machines in street-facing shops near a certain city's senior high school and Hecheng Elementary School in the Gangbei District of the same city. They promised the shop owners a monthly rent of 400 yuan for each slot machine and additionally offered a 5% commission on the slot machine's profits. By the time the case was discovered, the two defendants had illegally profited 1,000 yuan in total. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Tang during the court hearing. Moreover, these facts are substantiated by evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the arrest record, household registration certificates, site maps, identification photos, identification records and photos, transcripts of evidence extraction, list of seized items, account statements, the video game facilities and equipment appraisal report and notice, testimonies from witnesses Wei, Gan, Yan, Yuan, and Li, as well as confessions from defendants Huang and Tang, which are sufficient to establish the case.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on February 28, 2014, at around 13:00, the defendants Yang and Dong, at the west side of the entrance to the Democratic Party office building at the Xinxing Market on Xinxing Road in Wuzhou City, committed theft in front of a stall selling sundries. Dong was responsible for keeping watch while Yang used tweezers to steal a wallet from the shopping bag carried by the victim Hu. The wallet contained RMB 4600 in cash and two China Post Savings Bank cards. As the two defendants were about to leave the scene, they were apprehended by police officers. It was further found that after the incident, the public security organs seized the stolen wallet, two bank cards, RMB 4600, and two tweezers used as tools for the crime. The stolen items have been returned to the victim Hu. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial, and they are corroborated by the victim Hu's statement, witnesses Xie and Deng’s testimonies, seizure and return of property document list, photos of the stolen items and tools used in the crime, identification records and photos, proof of the crime resolution process, the defendants' household registration certificates, and criminal record judgment materials, which are sufficient to establish the charges.


After trial, it was found that on October 20, 2014, at around 10 p.m., the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang went to the front of Zhongyin Building, Panyu Square, Qinghe East Road, Shiqiao Street, a certain district in a certain city, where they met the victim Lin, as prearranged, and a dispute arose over a debt. During this time, the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang assaulted the victim Lin with fists and feet, causing injuries (identified as minor injuries of the second degree). Subsequently, the defendants Chen and Zhang used a kitchen knife and an anti-theft lock to smash the windows of Lin's car (assessed damage cost was 500 RMB). The police who arrived after being notified apprehended the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang at the scene and seized a kitchen knife and an anti-theft lock used in the crime. It was also found that after the incident, the defendants compensated the victim Lin with 20,000 RMB and received his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial and are substantiated by the victim Lin's statements, the confessions of the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Qu, Li, and Qin, identification records, appraisal conclusions, settlement agreement, receipt, on-site inspection records, site diagrams, photographic materials, the process of arrest, and the solving of the case, among other evidence.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Henan Province charged that on October 19, 2016, the defendants Wang and Zhao, together with "Someone," successively targeted Jia supermarket operated by the victim Yang and Yi supermarket operated by the victim Zhou, located in the western section of Jiaotong Road in the district of the same city. "Someone" was responsible for waiting nearby on a motorcycle, while Zhao, under the guise of purchasing goods, distracted the store staff, and Wang took the opportunity to steal cigarettes from the store. Zhao was caught by Yang after stealing cigarettes from Jia supermarket, while Wang and "Someone" fled with the cigarettes. According to the appraisal, the stolen cigarettes were valued at a total of 2,330 yuan. It was also found that after the incident, the family members of defendants Wang and Zhao compensated the victims for all economic losses. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Zhao during the trial, and were sufficiently confirmed by victim statements, documentary evidence, restitution certificates, the circumstances of the apprehension, and other evidence.


The public prosecution agency charges that from October 2013 to July 2014, the defendant He contacted others via QQ and used courier services to purchase counterfeit 10-yuan notes at prices ranging from 1.6 to 2.0 yuan each. He then sold them at prices ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 yuan each, thereby making a profit. He sold approximately 2,627 counterfeit 10-yuan notes, and with the 526 notes found in his home and the 656 notes returned by U-Speed Courier, he purchased a total of 3,809 counterfeit 10-yuan notes, with a total face value of 38,090 yuan. Defendant Liu, knowing that He was purchasing counterfeit currency, still assisted He in June 2014 by signing for courier packages on three occasions and advancing payments, signing for a total of 550 counterfeit notes, with a total face value of 5,500 yuan. The counterfeit banknotes discovered in the case were authenticated by the Ziyang Central Sub-branch of the People's Bank of China as counterfeit. It was additionally confirmed that after being brought to justice, defendants He and Liu both truthfully confessed their criminal activities. After He was taken into custody, he assisted judicial authorities in capturing other criminal suspects, which was verified to be true. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants and their defense during the trial hearing, and were substantiated with documentary evidence, witness testimonies, inspection records, lists of seized items, and expert opinions, all sufficient for a conviction.


The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. In 2013, the defendant Liang, knowing that it was a stolen vehicle, purchased a silver-white Wuling Zhiguang minivan without license plates or documentation from Jiang (handled in a separate case) for 5,000 yuan on a certain road in Village Jia, District of this city. According to the Changzhi City Price Appraisal Center, the value of the vehicle involved is 11,807 yuan. 2. In November 2013, the defendants Yang and Liang, knowing that it was a vehicle of unknown origin, purchased a white Wuling Zhiguang minivan without license plates or documentation from a person nicknamed "Little Li" (handled in a separate case) for 10,000 yuan at Liang's home in Village Yi, this district. According to the Changzhi City Price Appraisal Center, the value of the vehicle involved is 18,115 yuan. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above facts.


The prosecution charges: On March 18, 2015, at around 16:00, the defendants Xu and Gao, along with others, forcibly took Shen into a vehicle near the "Huateng" community in a certain district of this city due to a debt dispute. They detained Shen at various locations in the city, during which they assaulted Shen and forced Shen to write an IOU for 20,000 yuan. They also confiscated the watch in Shen's possession. At about 21:00 that evening, the defendants Xu and Gao, along with others, after forcing Shen to hand over and destroy a 15,000 yuan promissory note owed to defendant Gao, released Shen. According to an appraisal, Shen's injuries were minor.