diff --git "a/cmdl.jsonl" "b/cmdl.jsonl"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/cmdl.jsonl"
@@ -0,0 +1,2080 @@
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: \n\n1. On the night of July 8, 2013, the defendants Chen, Liu, and Chu conspired in advance to snatch a gold necklace in the room of the Renhe Hotel at Chicheng Street, Tiantai County. After coming to an agreement, the three took a moped driven by Chu to Shiliang Bay Park near the bridge on Jiuchang Road, Chicheng Street, Tiantai County. When the victim, Ding, got on an electric bike, Chen snatched a gold necklace from around Ding's neck. After succeeding, they fled the scene on Chu's moped. Subsequently, Chu and Liu sold the stolen gold necklace to Seagull Goldsmiths for 3,600 yuan. The appraisal determined that the stolen gold necklace was valued at 5,450 yuan. The gold from the necklace has been returned to the victim after being remelted.\n\n2. In the afternoon of July 9, 2013, defendants Chen and Liu agreed to snatch another gold necklace. Liu drove the moped carrying Chen to a road outside Tiantai Vocational and Technical Secondary School on Tiantaishan Middle Road in Tiantai County, approached Yang, who was riding an electric bike, and Chen snatched the gold necklace from around Yang’s neck. The appraisal determined that the stolen gold necklace was valued at 4,860 yuan, and the necklace has been returned to the victim. After the incident, defendant Chu assisted the police in capturing one suspect.\n\nIn summary, defendants Chen and Liu committed two instances of snatching, gaining property valued at a total of 10,310 yuan. Defendant Chu participated in one instance, gaining property valued at 5,450 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen, Liu, and Chu during the court hearing. Their confessions are consistent with the statements of the victims, Ding and Yang, and the testimony of witness Ying. The evidence includes the Appraisal Conclusion Document, Identification Record, Scene Investigation Record, Appraisal Opinion, Criminal Judgment, Video Material, Seizure and Return Lists, Incident-related Mobile Inventory, Proof, Tiantai Seagull Goldsmiths Register, Household Registration Certificate, Account of Arrest, and Description of Previous Offenses, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On April 24, 2014, at around 3 am, the defendant Liu hired the defendants Luo and Wang to drive a modified blue unlicensed tanker from a tannery in a certain village of a certain city to transport away 20 tons of tannery wastewater. Later, Luo and Wang were preparing to dump the tannery wastewater into the river canal beside the South Road of the National Grain Reserve Depot on the Anxin Line of the city when they were caught red-handed by the law enforcement officers of the city's Environmental Protection Bureau. According to the testing conducted by the Environmental Monitoring Station of the city on the tannery wastewater in the tanker, the total chromium concentration of the wastewater was 0.692mg/L, and the chemical oxygen demand concentration was 7.67×10^3mg/L, classifying it as a toxic substance. Subsequently, the Environmental Protection Department of Hebei Province replied with recognition of this monitoring data. The prosecution read aloud and presented the following evidence in support of the above charges before the court: 1. Physical evidence: one Dongfeng brand tanker; 2. Documentary evidence, including a case registration form, the decision to file the case, photos of the tools used in the crime, the document transferring the suspected environmental crime case, an investigation report from the Environmental Protection Bureau of a certain city on the illegal discharge of tannery wastewater incident beside the river canal on the National Grain Reserve Depot Road of the Anxin Line in a certain city, monitoring reports, a reply from the Environmental Protection Department of Hebei Province, investigation notes, the criminal judgment of the People's Court of a certain city in Hebei Province, certification from the Environmental Protection Bureau of a certain city, case details, and household registration certificates. Witness testimonies; 4. Confessions from the defendants Liu, Luo, and Wang. 5. Inspection and examination records, including the on-site inspection records from the Environmental Protection Bureau of a certain city.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiangbei District in a certain city charged that around 20:00 on a certain day in early December 2014, defendant Ni allowed Li to use the drug methamphetamine in his home at 1 Dayou, Gejia Village, Zhuangqiao Street, within this district. Around 22:00 on a day more than ten days later, defendant Ni again allowed Li to use methamphetamine at the same location. Around 20:00 on January 18, 2015, defendant Ni once more allowed Li to use methamphetamine at the same location. Around 20:00 on a day in late November 2014, defendant Zhao allowed Jing to use methamphetamine in a room located at 38 Beishi Street, Hongtang Street, within this district, where he lived. On the afternoon and evening of January 22, 2015, defendant Zhao again allowed Jing to use methamphetamine at the same location. On January 23, 2015, defendants Ni and Zhao were arrested by the police for drug use. After being brought to justice, the two confessed to the criminal acts of allowing others to use drugs, facts which the public security organs had not yet uncovered. These facts, to which defendants Ni and Zhao confessed without objection in court, are supported by evidence submitted by the prosecution. This evidence, which was cross-examined and verified in court, includes documentary evidence such as administrative penalty decisions, community drug treatment decisions, mandatory isolation drug treatment decisions, identification documents, the process of arrest, and case-solving records. The testimonies of witnesses Wang, Jing, and Li, the confessions of defendants Ni and Zhao, and the expert opinion on-site test report further corroborate these facts, which are sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Ni": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on March 23, 2013, at 21:30, at the intersection under the Happy Disco building in Qian'an City, defendant Zhang got into a verbal altercation with Yang Yi, Lu, and Yang Jia over a car reversing issue. After defendant Ceng arrived at the scene, he, along with defendant Zhang, injured Yang Jia's nasal bone and damaged the eardrums of Lu and Yang Yi (on April 1, 2013, Yang Jia's injury was assessed as minor injury). On April 16, 2014, the injuries of the victim Yang Jia were evaluated as minor injury of the second degree by the Qian'an City Public Security Bureau forensic examination; on April 12, 2013, the injuries of victims Lu and Yang Yi were respectively evaluated as minor injuries by the Qian'an City Public Security Bureau forensic examination; on October 9, 2014, Yang Jia's injuries were re-evaluated as minor injury of the second degree by the Tianjin Jinshi Judicial Appraisal Center; on October 12 and 14, 2014, the injuries of victims Lu and Yang Yi were re-evaluated as slight injuries by the Tianjin Jinshi Judicial Appraisal Center. The prosecution has presented corresponding evidence to the court regarding the alleged facts.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that in July 2019, during the investigation of a fraud case involving Luo (handled in a separate case) and others, the Fengxian Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau discovered that Luo illegally obtained personal information from the defendant Xue for fraudulent activities. Defendants Zhang, Sun, and Tao also illegally obtained personal information from defendant Xue. The specific facts are as follows:\n\n1. From May 2018 to July 2019, defendant Xue, in order to seek illegal gains, collected personal information by publishing links on the internet. After an appraisal of the mobile phone and computer seized from defendant Xue, it was found that he obtained over 240,000 records conforming to mobile phone number rules using the aforementioned method.\n\n2. From April 2018 to June 2019, defendant Zhang, in order to seek illegal gains, illegally obtained personal information through WeChat from Xue and others. After an appraisal of the mobile phone seized from defendant Zhang, it was found that he obtained 35,748 records conforming to mobile phone number rules using the aforementioned method.\n\n3. From November 2018 to July 2019, defendant Sun, in order to seek illegal gains, illegally obtained personal information through WeChat from defendant Xue. After an appraisal of the mobile phone seized from defendant Sun, it was found that he obtained 10,217 records conforming to mobile phone number rules using the aforementioned method.\n\n4. From April 2018 to July 2019, defendant Tao, in order to seek illegal gains, illegally obtained over 5,000 records of personal information from defendant Xue at unit prices of 3 yuan, 5 yuan, and 10 yuan. On September 26, 2019, defendant Sun voluntarily surrendered to the authorities and truthfully confessed his crime.\n\nThe above facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the trial, and were supported by the testimony of the witness Luo, WeChat chat and transfer details, the judicial appraisal report issued by Shanghai Honglian Network Technology Co., Ltd. computer forensic center, the search warrant, search records, seizure decision, seizure records, seizure list, remittance receipts, explanatory notes, working conditions, and circumstances of the case issued and produced by the public security organs, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on January 28, 2018, at the Prince and Princess Adventure KTV in a certain county, the defendants Cui, Pei, and Teng had a verbal altercation with staff members Gao and Zeng over billing issues. After negotiations between the parties, defendant Pei requested Gao and Zeng to escort them outside. Outside, defendants Pei and Teng physically assaulted Gao by punching and kicking him. When Zeng tried to intervene, defendants Cui and Pei also attacked Zeng. According to forensic evaluation, Zeng suffered fractures in both nasal bones classified as minor injuries of the second degree, and head trauma with neurological symptoms classified as slight injuries. On March 19, 2018, defendants Cui and Teng surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The three defendants have since compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their understanding. The above facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Zeng and Gao, surveillance video (on CD), forensic evaluation reports, and the confessions of the three defendants. The circumstances of surrender, compensation, and obtaining understanding are evidenced by the case closure report, interrogation records, receipts, and letters of understanding.", "label": {"Pei": ["Imprisonment"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment"], "Teng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wenzhou City charged that between February 5 and March 10, 2014, defendants You and Cheng drove a Hyundai sedan with the license plate number C××××× on main roads such as Renmin Road and Jiangbin Road in a certain district. They used \"pseudo base station\" equipment installed in the car to illegally occupy the public frequency of China Mobile Communications Company (with a transmission frequency of 945.0MHz and a transmission power of 15.03W) to send advertisement SMS messages about the installation of surveillance and satellite TV to nearby people. During this period, the two defendants also helped others send recruitment and Taobao advertisement SMS messages in a similar manner in a certain district and county. Upon inspection of the aforementioned \"pseudo base station\" equipment, it was found that You and Cheng successfully sent a total of 277,347 IMSI numbers between February 5 and March 10, 2014. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court trial and are corroborated by evidence including photos of the crime tools, population information, seizure list, explanations, circumstances of the case, site search records, electronic evidence inspection report, and test reports, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"You": ["Imprisonment"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendant Cui conspired with defendant Wang and co-defendant Wu (separately prosecuted) to create fake fraudulent links to deceive victims into clicking and paying, with Wang responsible for finding an app to withdraw the money, which would then be split equally among the three. Defendant You and defendant Zhang learned about the above fraudulent method online. On June 26, 2020, You added victim Xu as a QQ friend. The next day, You falsely claimed that the victim could earn money by doing Taobao tasks and tricked the victim into downloading the fake \"Part-time Taobao\" app. Subsequently, defendant You had defendant Zhang find a fraudulent link, and Zhang contacted defendant Cui via QQ. Cui created a fake fraudulent link according to the amount provided by Zhang. You sent the link to victim Xu and falsely claimed that clicking the link would not result in actual payment but would complete a task to earn a commission. The victim Xu followed You's instructions and paid RMB 15,000. Upon realizing the payment, the victim contacted You for inquiry. You claimed it was a backend error and said they would help connect to return the money, then promptly blocked the victim on QQ and lost contact. The money was transferred to a withdrawal channel, the \"Sihai Yucang\" app, found by Wang in advance. After withdrawal operations, it entered an Alipay account controlled by Cui and was illegally appropriated by the defendants. Defendant You and defendant Zhang each received RMB 4,125 of the stolen money, while defendant Cui, defendant Wang, and co-defendant Wu each received RMB 2,250. After the crime was discovered, the four defendants jointly compensated the victim's financial losses. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution presented the victim's statement, witness testimonies, QQ chat records, Alipay transaction records, relevant documents, co-defendant confessions, and confessions from the four defendants as evidence in court.", "label": {"You": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on October 21, 2018, the victim, Xu, through an introduction by another person, borrowed 50,000 RMB from defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun in a certain community in a district of this city. The agreed loan term was 10 days with a daily interest of 2,000 RMB. Defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun, on the grounds of deducting interest and a deposit in advance, falsely increased the debt by 40,000 RMB. They also verbally informed the victim of \"trap clauses\" such as \"interest repayment not exceeding 12 noon\" to easily cause misunderstandings or breach of contract by the victim, Xu. They induced Xu to write an IOU for 90,000 RMB and created a bank transaction record of 90,000 RMB. During the loan period, the victim, Xu, paid a total of 20,000 RMB in daily interest. During this time, defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun, before the loan was due, summoned the victim Xu to an office in a district of this city, accusing Xu of breaching the contract on the grounds of \"interest repayment exceeding 12 noon,\" and demanded that Xu repay 87,000 RMB upon maturity to settle the account. On November 1, 2018, the victim Xu, by withdrawing cash via a bank card, paid 87,000 RMB to defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun in front of the Taizhou Pharmaceutical High-tech Zone branch of the Bank of Communications. Through the above method, defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun defrauded the victim Xu of 57,000 RMB, and the proceeds were divided equally among the three and spent. After being apprehended, defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun truthfully confessed their criminal acts, and the defendant Sun returned part of the illegal gains. To prove the above charges, the prosecution read out and presented evidence in court, including bank card transaction details, testimonies from witnesses including Liu, statements from the victim Xu, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhou, Luan, and Sun.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found: On the afternoon of December 1, 2014, defendant Zhong had a dispute with others over trivial matters. Subsequently, Zhong gathered defendant Li at a bridge near an internet cafe in a certain village, town, district, and city, where they used knives to injure victim Wang on the head and right hip, and victim Xu on the head and left elbow. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by victim Wang were classified as minor injuries of the first degree, while victim Xu's injuries were classified as slight. On the same afternoon, Zhong and Li were apprehended by the police near a restaurant in the same village, town, district, and city. During the trial at this court, the relatives of defendants Zhong and Li reached a reconciliation agreement with victims Wang and Xu, compensating them with a total of 24,000 yuan for their economic losses, and both victims expressed understanding regarding the actions of the defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhong and Li during the court hearing. Additionally, there are testimonies from victims Wang and Xu, witnesses Luo, Linghu A, Linghu B, Yong, among others, as well as identification records made by Linghu A and Xu, on-site inspection records and photos, outpatient and inpatient medical records, preliminary opinions on the degree of injury, forensic examination opinions on the degree of human injury, reconciliation agreement, receipts, public security administrative penalty decisions, apprehension process, explanations, investigation reports, and household registration evidence of the defendants, which sufficiently confirm these facts.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of Suzhou City charges that on August 1, 2013, at approximately 22:00, the defendants Qiu and Zou, after premeditation, went to the building of the victim Yang's futures company in a certain town of a district in Suzhou City. They used a crowbar to smash the car window and destroyed the windows of the Land Rover Freelander 2 vehicle with the license plate \"Zhe E×××××\" parked by the victim Yang at that location. According to the appraisal, the loss amounted to 15,230 RMB. On December 12, 2013, defendants Qiu and Zou turned themselves in to the Qidu Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain district of Suzhou City and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. After the incident, defendants Qiu and Zou compensated the victim Yang for the economic loss and obtained understanding. \n\nTo substantiate the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution agency submitted relevant evidence and thereby contended that: defendants Qiu and Zou intentionally destroyed another person's property together, and the amount was considerable. Their conduct violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for x crime. In the joint crime, defendants Qiu and Zou both played major roles and are thus principal offenders. After committing the crime, defendants Qiu and Zou both voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their crimes, constituting voluntary confessions, which can warrant a lighter or mitigated punishment. A sentence in accordance with the law is requested. \n\nThe above facts were not contested by defendants Qiu and Zou during the court proceedings, and there is sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including the victim Yang's statement record, witness testimonies from witnesses Gu and Xu, identification records, vehicle photographs, case handling process, price appraisal conclusion letter, settlement list, vehicle information, agreement, receipt, letter of understanding, population information, and other evidence.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zou": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution agency, one day in the first half of 2012, the defendants Shen and Ying, along with Li and Yan (both handled separately), colluded after prior planning in a residential house near Jinma Hotel on Haichang Street, Haining City. They used pre-prepared cheating tools such as remote-controlled dice and invisible contact lenses to cooperate and gamble, swindling the victim Chen Yi out of 40,000 yuan in cash. On December 25, 2013, and January 5, 2014, defendants Shen and Ying respectively turned themselves in to the Chang'an Police Station of the Haining Municipal Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial of this case, defendant Shen returned 15,000 yuan, and defendant Ying returned 8,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shen and Ying during the court trial, and were corroborated by the victim's statement, co-defendants' confessions, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, receipts, administrative penalty decisions, situation explanations, case arrival information, and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ying": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in March 2016, on a certain day, defendant Tian rented an apartment on the 4th floor of Building 1, Yak Potang Community, Lotus Pond Town, in a certain district of a certain city, and planned with his wife, defendant Tang, to lure victims into the apartment for a massage, during which defendant Tian would take the opportunity to sneak into the room and steal their belongings. On March 15, 2016, at around 12:00 PM, the victim, Chen, was passing by a bus station near a certain town in a certain district of a certain city when defendant Tang approached and struck up a conversation. Under the pretense of providing massage services, she led Chen into the apartment and asked him to remove his clothes and place them on the bedside cabinet for the massage. Seizing the opportunity, defendant Tian used a spare key to enter the apartment and stole 2400 yuan in cash from Chen’s pants pocket. Subsequently, defendant Tang used the pretext of having to take a bath before ", "label": {"Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on July 19, 2014, defendants Chen, Chen, along with Yang, Luo (all handled in separate cases), and others, in order to force others to join a pyramid scheme, lured the victim Li to a house on Shanglang Road in a certain city under the pretense of finding a job by Luo. The defendants Chen, Chen, and others then jointly guarded the victim, preventing him from leaving until he was rescued by police officers from the Public Security Bureau of the city on the 23rd of the same month. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen, Chen during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the statement of the victim Li; the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Nie, Qin, Tao, and another Li; identification records; on-site photos; relevant documentary evidence; and the account of the arrest by the public security authorities, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that from October to November 2016, the defendants Zhu, Sun, Zhang, Huang, and Wang (handled in a separate case) went to various places in certain provinces under the arrangement of Zeng (handled in a separate case). They used other people’s resident identity cards to apply for credit cards, online banking USB keys, etc., at banks such as China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Zeng provided Zhu with the identity cards, SIM cards, funds, etc., needed for card issuance and paid wages. Zhu was responsible for distributing identity cards and SIM cards, driving card issuers, namely defendants Sun, Zhang, Huang, and others, to different places to apply for cards, scouting bank branches, mailing back the completed bank cards, tallying the number of cards issued, and paying salaries and daily expenses. Defendants Sun, Zhang, Huang, and Wang used other people’s identity documents to open bank accounts and fraudulently obtain credit cards and USB keys. They received a reward of 30 to 200 yuan per card. On November 9, 2016, defendants Zhu and others committed crimes in this city and were later captured by the public security organs. The police seized 12 fraudulently obtained credit cards, one Industrial and Commercial Bank of China USB key, one charger, seven other people’s identity cards, three China Unicom SIM cards, and other items. Upon investigation, defendants Zhu, Sun, Zhang, Huang, and Wang fraudulently obtained more than 198 credit cards using the aforementioned method. Defendant Sun directly handled the fraudulent obtaining of more than 66 credit cards, Zhang more than 62, and Huang more than 46. The above facts are confirmed by the testimony of witness Jin, enumerated by the prosecution in court, and cross-examined during the trial; search records, inspection records, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, identification records and photographs produced by the public security organs; electronic evidence examination work records, accounting information, WeChat payment details, evidence retrieval notifications, evidence retrieval lists, video surveillance, bank card transaction details, audit record details, personal information inquiries, STM transaction information, the arrest descriptions provided by police officers, explanations, household registration certificates, and the confessions of defendants Zhu, Sun, Zhang, and Huang regarding the aforementioned facts. This court confirms these facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Linchuan District in a certain city charged that around 1 PM on November 14, 2014, defendants Huang and Peng rode an electric bike to the vicinity of the Fuzhou Unicom Company on Linchuan Avenue in the city. Huang rode the bike to keep watch, while Peng stole a black OPAI electric bike belonging to the victim, Luo. Huang and Peng were caught by the police while they were washing the stolen electric bike at a car wash near the Fuhe Bridge in the city. An appraisal determined that the value of the stolen OPAI electric bike was 2,658 RMB. On the evening of May 3, 2013, around 6 PM, Huang rode to the parking area near the north gate of Rushui Park in the city and broke the left rear window of a Volkswagen Touareg with license plate Gan F××××× using a stone. He stole a women's PRADA handbag from the car, which contained the victim Liu's identity card, several bank cards, and more than 4,000 RMB in cash and other items. The evidence used by the public prosecution includes: physical evidence; documentary evidence; appraisal opinions; testimony from the witness Xin; statements from the victims Luo and Liu; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Huang and Peng.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that at approximately midnight on August 14, 2020, on the road opposite Jin Chao Moneybox KTV in Donggang City, Liaoning Province, defendants Tong and You had a dispute with the victim Zhao over who would escort a lady home. Subsequently, defendant Tong and Zhao engaged in a fistfight, during which both fell to the ground and were separated by accompanying friends. Afterward, the victim Zhao continued to insult Tong and hindered his departure, leading defendant You to kick and punch Zhao, knocking him to the ground. Then both defendants Tong and You further kicked Zhao, resulting in head injuries for Zhao. An assessment determined that Zhao sustained a grade one minor injury from an epidural hematoma; a grade one minor injury from cerebral contusion; a grade two minor injury from a skull fracture; and a minor scalp laceration. Defendants Tong and You were brought to the case upon being summoned by phone and truthfully confessed t", "label": {"Tong": ["Imprisonment"], "You": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that in March 2016, defendants Li and Tang conspired in advance to steal a boat. At about 8:40 PM on March 24th, defendants Li and Tang went together to a village in a town in this city and stole a fiberglass boat (including a Huake brand HKGJ7.0 outboard motor) owned by Lu, which was moored in the river south of Yuejin Bridge. The items were valued at 4,050 RMB. After the crime, the public security authorities recovered the fiberglass boat and returned it to the victim, who has forgiven the defendants. After being apprehended, defendants Li and Tang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft. The defendants Li and Tang raised no objections to the above facts during the court hearing, and there is evidence to support these facts, including the victim Lu's report statement, on-site inspection records produced by the public security authorities, identification records and photos, a letter of forgiveness, a price certification opinion issued by the Yixing City Price Certification Center, and investigation materials recording the solving of the criminal case. The criminal judgments by the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court and this court respectively confirm that defendants Li and Tang were criminally punished for their offenses.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on May 30, 2015, at around 4:00 PM, defendants Wang and Lv had a verbal altercation with the victim, Chen, at the entrance of the \"Sanxin Door Industry\" renovation shop in the Daiwang Office of Macun District, Jiaozuo City, due to a dispute over customers. Subsequently, Wang and Lv assaulted the victim on the head and face, causing fractures to both sides of his nasal bone and a fracture to the left frontal process of his maxilla. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by the victim Chen were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, both parties reached a reconciliation through mediation by the public security authorities. The two defendants compensated the victim with 60,000 RMB, which has been fully paid, and the victim forgave the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by the defendants during the court hearing without objection and are corroborated by the victim Chen's statements, witness testimonies from individuals such as Zhang, the forensic assessment, mediation agreement, receipt, letter of forgiveness, household registration certificate, and the case dispatch documentation, providing sufficient evidence for confirmation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lv": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that on the evening of April 22, 2015, the defendants Li and Chen illegally caught aquatic products using electric fishing methods during the closed fishing season in the Wujia Ferry waters of the Cao'e River in a certain district of a certain city (waters of a certain location). They were subsequently apprehended by the public security authorities. It was further found that the closed fishing season in the waters of a certain area of a certain city was from April 1 to May 31, 2015. The public security authorities seized from defendant Li three batteries, one transformer, one netted bamboo pole, and one plastic bucket. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Chen during the trial. The evidence includes the confessions of defendants Li and Chen, identification records and photos, a list of seized items and photos, a water system map, the appraisal basis from the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery, and Animal Husbandry Bureau of a certain district of a certain city, the 2015 closed fishing season announcement of a certain city, the apprehension process, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on December 8, 2014, at approximately 17:40, the defendant Wang was driving a two-wheeled motorcycle with the license plate Lu D××××× along Renmin Road in the Shizhong District of a certain city, when he was about 20 meters east of the Yue Lou Village Bridge, and was involved in a traffic accident with the victim, Zhang. The victim Zhang was injured and fell to the ground. Subsequently, the defendant Zhou drove a small car with the license plate Lu D××××× to the accident scene and was also involved in a traffic accident with the fallen Zhang, causing further injuries to the victim Zhang. After the accidents, both defendants Wang and Zhou fled the scene. The victim Zhang died after unsuccessful emergency treatment in the hospital. According to the forensic evaluation, the cause of death was traumatic and hemorrhagic shock due to multiple injuries consistent with a road traffic accident. The traffic accident liability determination concluded that defendants Wang and Zhou bore full responsibility for the accident. After the incident, defendant Zhou voluntarily turned himself in to the police. Defendants Wang and Zhou each reached a compensation agreement with the victim's close family members, compensating them for their economic losses and obtaining their forgiveness. During the court hearing, the facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Wang and Zhou and were supported by the testimonies of ten witnesses, including Xue, Meng, and Lu, the traffic accident scene investigation record, scene diagrams, scene photographs, autopsy report, traffic accident determination, compensation agreements, letters of forgiveness, a description of the case resolution, household registration certificates, and related documentation, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendants Yin and Liu, at the invitation of Zhan A (already convicted), together with Zhou and Yang (both already convicted), under the pretense of collecting a debt, forcibly took the victim, Zhan, from Yunlin Story Restaurant on Sanyanqiao Road in Jianghan District of this city at around 22:00 on November 22, 2012. They confined the victim, Zhan, in a private room of a KTV in a certain township of a certain district in the city, unlawfully restricting his personal freedom, and used verbal threats and violent beatings to extort money from him. At around 3:00 on the 23rd of the same month, defendants Yin and Liu, along with their accomplices, took the victim, Zhan, to Duowen Community on Youyi Road in Jianghan District of this city to withdraw money, where the victim, Zhan, managed to escape and report to the police. According to forensic examination, the victim, Zhan, sustained multiple soft tissue injuries, which were classified as minor injuries. Defendants Yin and Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their participation in the criminal acts on April 30 and June 15, 2014, respectively. During the trial, Liu's family voluntarily compensated the victim Zhan for economic losses in the amount of 1,500 RMB, and the victim Zhan expressed understanding towards defendant Liu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are sufficiently substantiated by evidence such as screenshots of text messages, residency information forms, police apprehension and case-solving reports, criminal judgments, testimony from witness Xia, confessions from accomplices Zhan A, Zhou, and Yang, the statement and identification from the victim Zhan, and certain forensic identification reports.", "label": {"Yin": ["Detention"], "Liu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the afternoon of April 16, 2015, defendants Li and Chen went to Room 203, Building 10, Maozhushan, China National Rice Research Institute, Fuyang District, Hangzhou City, where the victim Zhang rented an apartment. First, defendant Chen went upstairs to knock on the door to confirm that no one was home, then defendant Li used a ladder to climb through the window to break in, and then opened the door to let defendant Chen in. Together, defendants Li and Chen stole an assembled desktop computer worth 1,890 RMB. After the incident, the families of defendants Li and Chen compensated the victim for the full loss. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Chen during the trial, and are supported by the victim Zhang's statement, the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Chen, testimony from witness Wang, surveillance video, identification records and photos, on-site investigation records, site plans and photos, evidence receipt lists, second-hand transaction registration forms, price assessment reports, receipts, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release after serving sentences, criminal record evidence, case resolution details, and the household registration certificates of defendants Li and Chen, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that in April 2016, the defendants Zhao, Yu, Liu, and Zhou, with the purpose of making a profit, established a gambling venue under the control of the four defendants for others to gamble. They organized a website with projects such as the \"Jilin Kuaile\" lottery as a platform for profit-making gambling. Defendants Yu and Zhao were responsible for funding, while defendant Zhou was responsible for creating the gambling website (named \"Longteng International\") and conducting technical maintenance. Defendants Yu and Zhao developed defendant Liu and others as their subordinates, and Yu, Zhao, and Liu each attracted other individuals to bet using dedicated accounts on the gambling website. Defendants Yu and Zhao paid Liu and other subordinates a betting rebate of three to five percent of the bet amounts accepted by the website. By the time the case was discovered, the \"Longteng International\" website had accepted a total of 57,565,398.00 yuan in bets, earning 2,548,434.30 yuan in profits. Of this, defendant Liu bet 1,697,756.00 yuan and received a profit share of more than 40,000 yuan. Aside from paying Zhou for the creation and maintenance of the website, defendants Yu and Zhao additionally paid Zhou 21,000 yuan for network technical support and maintenance services.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that starting from May 15, 2015, the defendant Li, together with Peng (handled in a separate case), set up a \"Shark Ocean\" game machine with gambling functions on the first floor at No. 139 Xinggong North Road, Kunyang Town, Pingyang County, for others to gamble. They hired the defendant Xu to be responsible for bookkeeping and providing token exchange services and other daily management in the store, and paid Xu’s salary based on a basic wage plus commission. By June 17 of the same year, when seized by the public security agency, Li, Xu, and others had profited over 10,000 RMB using the gambling machine. According to the appraisal, the \"Shark Ocean\" game machine set (with 8 independent operation stations, one of which is damaged), each basic unit can independently conduct gambling games and has gambling functions. After the incident, defendant Li turned himself in at the Pingyang County Public Security Bureau on June 18, 2015, and truthfully confessed his crime. During the trial at this court, defendant Li returned 10,000 RMB, the joint illegal proceeds. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Xu during the court trial, and were supported by their previous confessions, the statements of the co-defendant Peng, testimonies from witnesses Xu, Yang A, Lin, Chen, Yang B, Jin, Ye, and more evidence such as identification records, inspection records, evidence preservation list, confiscation items list, seizure list, photographs, two mobile phones, expert opinion on electronic gaming facility and equipment, household registration information, the arrest process, criminal judgment document, administrative penalty decision document, and receipt of returned illicit money, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local people's procuratorate charged: On the afternoon of April 3, 2014, defendant Shu had a dispute with Yuan over worker wages at the Xujia Town Community Service Center. Subsequently, defendant Shu contacted defendant Ma by phone for assistance. Around 9:30 p.m. that day, defendant Shu, defendant Ma, and four young men gathered by Ma, who are currently at large, arrived at the Xujia Town Community Service Center with pickaxes and other tools and injured Yuan, causing a fracture in Yuan's left calcaneus. According to the appraisal, the injury to Yuan's left heel was classified as a secondary minor injury. After the incident, defendant Ma was apprehended and brought to justice, while defendant Shu voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ on April 25, 2014.", "label": {"Shu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "It was further established that defendants Zhang and Liu sold the stolen Jingyangguang brand electric vehicle to Xu, receiving RMB 900. After the incident, the police recovered the Jingyangguang brand electric vehicle from Xu and returned it to the victim. Zhang and Liu raised no objections to these facts during the trial. This is corroborated by the victim Wu's statement records, witness testimony records from Yi and Xu, identification records and photographs produced by the public security organs, the valuation conclusion document (No. 170 of 2017) issued by the Price Appraisal Center of a district in Changzhou City, the list of items seized and returned by a branch of the Changzhou City Public Security Bureau, and the apprehension report produced by officers from the Dongcheng Police Station of a district branch of the Changzhou City Public Security Bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On May 1, 2013, defendant Chen set up a gambling den in the form of \"Ba Er Zhang\" (a type of card game) on an open space in front of No. 15, Qi Jiguang Road, Haimen Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city. This activity attracted gamblers, including Huang A, Wang, Zhou, among others, to participate. Defendant Huang was employed by Chen to keep watch for the casino. On June 3, police officers captured defendants Chen and Huang at the gambling site. During this period, the casino illegally profited by 30,000 yuan, and Huang earned a personal income of 2,000 yuan for keeping watch for 15 days. During the trial, defendant Chen returned the illegal proceeds of 30,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Huang during the court hearing and have been corroborated by the confessions of gamblers Huang A, Wang, and Zhou, along with investigation records, identification records, the circumstances leading to the arrest, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release upon sentence completion, and administrative penalty decision, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Established through trial: At approximately 2 a.m. on July 17, 2014, defendants Sun, Guan, Fu, and others, while shopping at a small shop located at the intersection of Tongyang Road and Guangming Road in a certain town within a certain county, got into a dispute with Wang, who was also there to shop, over a trivial matter. Sun, Guan, Fu, and others assaulted Wang, and Sun used a beer bottle to injure the right arm of victim Wei, who had come to mediate. According to the criminal forensic evaluation by the public security bureau of the county, Wei’s injuries were classified as minor. After the incident, Sun, Guan, and Fu reached a mediation agreement with Wei and collectively compensated Wei with 100,000 RMB, obtaining the victim Wei's understanding and forgiveness. It was also found that the county's public security bureau issued an administrative penalty decision document (No. 699 for 2014) on July 18, 2014, deciding to administratively detain perpetrator Guan for fifteen days for harming Wang. The detention period was from July 18, 2014, to August 2, 2014. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the three defendants during the court trial, and they are substantiated by documentary evidence such as the registration form for case acceptance, administrative penalty decision, account of case arrival, household registration certificates, photos of the injuries, hospitalization records, the mediation agreement, and the letter of understanding. Testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Sun, Wang (referred to as Wang Jia), Li, and Gao, along with statements from victims Wei and Wang, the forensic evaluation report issued by the forensic medical examination department of the county’s public security bureau, and records of the scene inspection, checks, and identifications, as well as video surveillance footage from the crime scene, are all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Guan": ["Imprisonment"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on August 28, 2018, the defendant Zhao, under the pretense of securing a job as a security inspector at a certain city's Wusu Airport for the wife of the victim Xi, whose name is Zhang, received a transfer of 30,000 yuan via Alipay from Xi in a park next to the Yaoluo Bridge in the county town of a certain city. On the morning of September 14 of the same year, under the pretense of needing additional funds, Zhao received 110,000 yuan in cash from Xi in a car parked by the roadside in the Fuli City area of a certain city. The defendant Zhao used the illicit funds to repay personal loans. On June 2, 2019, after Zhao was apprehended, the defendant Chang, upon learning that Zhao had been criminally detained, falsely claimed to Zhao's wife Chen that he could find someone to arrange bail for Zhao. On the morning of June 6 of the same year, he defrauded 40,000 yuan in cash in the Youshanmeijun community, Jiancaoping District, and in the evening at 19:00 tricked a WeChat transfer of 9,950 yuan. Chang used all the illicit funds to repay personal debts. On June 4, 2019, Zhao's family reimbursed Xi for all the funds, obtaining the victim's forgiveness. On July 4, 2019, Chang's family reimbursed Chen for all the money, obtaining the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhao and Chang during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence from the criminal investigation team in charge of the Julu area from the Xinghuarange sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, including the case registration form, filing decision, arrest process, and investigation report; the victim Xi's and Chen's reports and interrogation records, forgiveness letters; testimonies from witnesses Wu, Li, Ji, Zhang, and Qiao; identification records; Zhang's Alipay transaction records, chat logs between Chen and Chang, WeChat transfer records, transaction details from Guangda Bank; household registration certifications and confessions from defendants Zhao and Chang, which sufficiently confirm the findings.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: 1. At around 1 a.m. on August 8, 2014, defendants Li, Liu, and He (who was under 16 years old at the time of the incident), Chen Jia (already sentenced), Huang Jia, and Huang Yi (both handled in a separate case) went to the chicken farm at Tanpeng Reservoir in Suwei Town, a certain district of a certain city, and stole 64 chickens raised by the victim, Chen Yi. 2. At around 1 a.m. on August 26, 2014, defendants Li, Liu, and He, Chen Jia, Huang Jia, and Huang Yi again went to the aforementioned chicken farm and stole 30 chickens raised by the victim, Chen Yi. Each of the stolen chickens weighed about 2.5 kilograms, and according to the appraisal, the 94 chickens stolen were valued at a total of 6,580 yuan at the time of the incident. On December 24, 2014, defendant Li was arrested; on January 3, 2015, defendant Liu was arrested. Although Li and Liu did not truthfully confess to the above facts during the investigation phase, they voluntarily admitted in court to committing the aforementioned theft. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the arrest process, the identification record, the criminal case scene identification record and identification site photos, the criminal judgment, witness testimonies from Chen Jia and He, the price appraisal conclusion and appraisal opinion notice from a certain city's price appraisal center, the victim Chen Yi's statement, the defendants Li and Liu's confessions, and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On April 30, 2014, after conspiring together, Zhou, Cai, and Li orchestrated a plan where Cai, at the west gate of Lixiang Park pedestrian path in Nanshan District, Shenzhen, approached the victim, Mr. Chen, asking for help with unloading goods in exchange for payment. Mr. Chen agreed, and Cai then found Zhou, pretending to be a pedestrian, with the same pretext. Cai brought Mr. Chen and Zhou to the parking lot of B&Q in Nanshan District. Cai took out an electronic component, claiming it was valuable (worth 100 RMB each) and asked the two to handle it carefully, before leaving the parking lot on some pretext.\n\nSubsequently, Li appeared, pretending to be an employee of Sanyo and falsely stated his willingness to purchase the electronic components from Mr. Chen and Zhou for 150 RMB each. Zhou then persuaded Mr. Chen that they should pool money to buy the electronic components from Cai and resell them. Mr. Chen agreed. After Li left on some pretext, Zhou and Mr. Chen expressed their intention to buy the electronic components to Cai, who feigned reluctance but then agreed. Cai accompanied Mr. Chen to withdraw a total of 85,000 RMB from his home and the bank, while Zhou left pretending to get money.\n\nLater, the three met near the entrance of the Rainbow Mall in Nanshan District, where Cai, on the pretext of not being able to conduct the transaction with multiple people, tricked Mr. Chen into handing over the 85,000 RMB to Zhou and told Mr. Chen to go to the Agricultural Bank to look for Li. Subsequently, Zhou and Cai left the location, ceasing contact with Mr. Chen. Unable to find Li, Mr. Chen realized he had been deceived and reported the matter to the police. On May 24, 2014, police arrested Zhou, Cai, and Li in a certain village in a certain district of Shenzhen.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 10 PM on September 20, 2016, defendants Zhou, He, and \"A\" (at large) were at the entrance of No. 51, Lane 4, Tuanjie Road, Jiefeng, Xiangzhou District, a certain city, where they saw victims Sheng and He together. Defendant Zhou suspected that victim Sheng and He had an ambiguous relationship, which led to an altercation with victim Sheng. Subsequently, defendants Zhou, He, and \"A\" assaulted victim Sheng, resulting in injuries to Sheng. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by victim Sheng were classified as minor injuries, level two. Defendant Zhou was apprehended by the Nanxi Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on October 27, 2016. On November 14 of the same year, defendant He surrendered to the Xiangzhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. It was also found that after the incident, defendants Zhou and He compensated victim Sheng for his losses and obtained his understanding. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou and He during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements and identification records of victim Sheng, testimonies and identification records of witnesses He, Zheng, and another He, apprehension records, arrival explanations, scene investigation report, resident population information, photocopy of identity card, proof of no criminal record, evidence retrieval notices and lists, mobile communication client details from a certain country, case handling explanations, letter of understanding, people's mediation agreement, identification documents, notification of identification opinions, scene photographs, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged that on May 17, 2019, at around 3 a.m., due to Sun being beaten, defendants Sun and Liu (already sentenced) gathered Zheng and Bao, Chang, Yang, Huang, Zhao, Gao, Wan, and Zhang (all already sentenced) to engage in a brawl at Wanda Plaza in the Tiexi District of a certain city with the individuals who had beaten Sun. After the aforementioned defendants arrived at the scene of the incident armed with machetes, clubs, and other instruments, they mistakenly identified the victim Xu and his friends as their intended targets and chased them with weapons. During the incident, Sun, armed with a weapon, joined Zheng and others in pursuing Xu and his friends. Bao, holding a machete, injured the victim Xu by chopping him, causing Xu to fall to the ground and go into shock, after which several defendants fled the scene. According to forensic examination, victim Xu sustained a distal fracture of the left radius and soft tissue laceration of the left wrist with hypovolemic s", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on February 23, 2014, at approximately 2 p.m., defendants Cai and Li, along with others, assaulted the victim, Li Yi, at the intersection of Dongfanghong Street and Dongshuncheng Road in the Mudan District of Heze City over a trivial matter. This resulted in soft tissue damage to Li Yi's nose and right eye, bilateral nasal bone fractures, and a fracture of the medial wall of the right eye socket. A forensic examination confirmed that Li Yi's injuries constituted minor injuries. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cai and Li during the court hearing. Moreover, these facts are sufficiently corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Sun, Li Bing, Liu, and others, the victim Li Yi's statement, injury assessment report, technical photographs, household registration certificate, arrest records, agreement documents, and receipts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Sun had a dispute with the victim Yan over Yan sending WeChat messages to his girlfriend. On September 18, 2017, Sun contacted the defendants Yang, Wang, and Bo (handled in a separate case). The four of them drove to Experimental High School in a vehicle driven by Sun. After Yan and a classmate left Experimental High School, Sun, Yang, Bo, and Wang took Yan and his classmate, also named Sun, to a small square opposite the school. Bo and Yang assaulted Yan, and Sun assaulted the classmate who tried to intervene, while threatening other classmates not to approach. Wang threatened the onlooking classmates with an extendable baton. When teachers from Experimental High School arrived to stop the fight, and Yan and his classmate returned to the school entrance, Sun retrieved hoe handles from the car trunk. Sun and Yang each took one, and Yang struck Yan once with a hoe handle. Bo proceeded to punch and kick Yan. Sun continued holding a hoe handle, and Wang held the extendable baton, intimidating the onlooking students not to approach. According to the forensic evaluation: Yan sustained a nasal bone fracture, assessed as a minor injury of second degree. After the incident, defendants Sun, Yang, and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the police. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Bo, Xu, another Sun, Gong, Zhu, Liu, and Wang A, as well as the Jiaohe City Public Security and Judicial Appraisal Center’s bodily injury assessment report, and video recordings, which are sufficient to conclude the case. The civil aspect has been privately settled, with defendant Sun compensating the victim Yan a total of 70,000 RMB for various economic losses.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention"], "Yang": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that on April 24, 2020, at 9 p.m., the victim, Yu, along with friends Chen and Zheng, got into a verbal altercation over a singing issue with manager Dai A (handled in a separate case), waiter Dai B (handled in a separate case), and Hu (handled in a separate case) at Old Cannon Music Barbecue in the ** District of Changchun City. The three pushed Yu outside and assaulted him. Defendants Jing, Wang, and Jiang also followed outside and assaulted Yu. Later, manager Dai A, waiter Dai B, and Hu returned to the establishment. Shortly thereafter, defendant Jing, without any reason, chased and attacked Yu with a wine bottle. Seeing this, defendants Wang and Jiang also chased and attacked Yu with wine bottles, each throwing a bottle that hit Yu in the head. After the incident, defendants Jing, Wang, and Jiang surrendered to the public security authorities and compensated the victim, Yu, with 160,000 RMB, obtaining his forgiveness.", "label": {"Jing": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged that at around 24:00 on August 15, 2014, defendants Wu and victim Fang had a verbal altercation and physical fight at the entrance of Good Voice KTV in a certain town of a certain city. Defendants Wu and Song injured Fang, and it was identified that Fang's injury was minor. Both parties have now reached a criminal reconciliation. Additionally, it was found that on October 23, 2014, defendant Wu was arrested by the public security authorities at the train station in a certain city; on October 4, 2014, public security officers interrogated defendant Song at the Shiliting Police Station of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city, and on December 25, 2014, defendant Song went to the Shiliting Police Station of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city and was criminally detained on that day. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Song during the trial, and were confirmed with evidence such as the statement from victim Fang, the testimony of witness Zhao, the forensic identification report, medical records, proof of arrival at the scene, household registration certificates, and reconciliation materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city in Hebei Province charged: At around midnight on January 14, 2013, Wu (currently at large under criminal detention), along with the defendants Chen and Hu, were entertaining at Mai Ge KTV on Jianhua West Road in a certain district of a certain city. Due to a trivial matter, they got into a verbal altercation with the victim, Wang Y. Wu, along with the defendants Chen and Hu, used beer bottles and fists to injure the victim, Wang Y. According to an assessment, the victim Wang Y.'s injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. The prosecution, while making these charges, also provided corresponding evidence, believing that the defendants Chen and Hu have constituted the crime of X and should be punished according to the law. Defendant Chen raised no objection to the facts of the charge of crime X by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Defendant Hu also raised no objection to the facts of the charge of crime X by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. After a trial, it was found that at around midnight on January 14, 2013, Wu (currently at large under criminal detention) and defendants Chen and Hu were entertaining at Mai Ge KTV on Jianhua West Road in a certain district of a certain city. Due to a trivial matter, they got into a verbal altercation with the victim, Wang Y. Wu, along with the defendants Chen and Hu, used beer bottles and fists to injure the victim, Wang Y. According to an assessment, the victim Wang Y.'s injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the defendants Chen and Hu reached a settlement with the victim Wang Y. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Hu during the court proceedings, and there was sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including household registration certificates of the defendants Chen and Hu, testimonies of witnesses Wang A, Li, Zheng, and Hou, the victim Wang Y.'s statement, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Chen and Hu, appraisal opinions, and identification records.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Pudong New Area of a certain city charges that on November 13, 2015, defendants Xu, Li, and Hu, after drinking, unjustifiably beat and injured victims Li, Liang, Mou, and Yan in the restroom of the Holiday Karaoke on XXX Zhangyang Road, Pudong New Area, in a certain city. According to forensic identification, victim Li sustained minor injuries, specifically contusions to the left auricle and soft tissue behind the ear, contusions to both eyes, and soft tissue contusions on the right hand. Victim Liang sustained minor injuries including a subgaleal hematoma, contusions to the left ear, and soft tissue contusions on the face. Victim Mou sustained minor injuries, specifically contusions to the soft tissue of the face and the soft tissue of the right eyelid. On January 7, 2016, after receiving notification by phone, defendants Xu, Li, and Hu turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. It was also found that the three defendants have compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu, Li, and Hu during the court trial and are supported by victim statements and identification records from Li, Liang, Mou, and Yan, which were verified as true during the trial, as well as by witness testimony from Zang, forensic identification opinions, related injury examination notices, letters of forgiveness from the victims, the 110 police report issued by the public security organ, and the account of the incident, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: The defendants, Zhang and Liu, are in a romantic relationship. On November 15, 2015, they rented room 208 at the Xincheng Family Inn located in Unit 5, Building 38, Yanghaitang Community, a certain district of a certain city. Around 3 PM on November 20, Zhang and Liu approached the inn's front desk to borrow a phone from the owner, the victim Xie, to send a photo. The victim Xie lent them his iPhone 6 Plus (16GB) valued at 4,390 RMB for this purpose. While using the phone, taking advantage of Xie's distraction, Zhang and Liu stole the phone and fled the scene. Later, near the Wangchengpo Post Office in a certain district of the city, they sold the phone at a low price of 1,800 RMB to a person named Xiao (handled in a separate case). The proceeds from the sale were squandered by both defendants. On December 8, 2015, Zhang and Liu were apprehended by police officers at Xiaoxiang Building on Fubuhe Road in a certain district of the city.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on August 21, 2013, at approximately 9 PM, the defendant Ma, in collusion with Yang, Lou, and Xiao (at large), encountered Qí at the seafood market on the East Outer Ring Road in Cangzhou City. Previously, Ma suspected that Qí had smashed his store, and Lou suspected that Qí had smashed his car. The four then took Qí to a car, where Ma demanded compensation from Qí for the smashed car and store. After Yang got out of the car, Lou and Qí had a dispute inside the car, during which Lou used a knife to injure Qí's head. Forensic examination determined that Qí sustained a minor injury of the second degree. That night, under the coercion of Ma and others, Qí had a friend transfer 44,200 yuan to an account provided by Ma. On the morning of August 22, at around 7 AM, Ma, Lou, and Xiao left Qí at the entrance of the city hospital and departed. It was further ascertained that after the incident, the defendants Ma, Yang, and Lou jointly compensated the victim Qí for economic losses amounting to 80,000 yuan. During the trial, the defendants Ma, Yang, and Lou did not dispute the aforementioned facts. There are confessions from the three defendants, statements from the victim Qí, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Zhang, Qiang, Li, and Qí J, a record of victim Qí identifying Ma and Lou, a forensic identification report (2013) Lin Jian Zi No. 434 issued by Cang County Judicial Medical Appraisal Center, an IOU issued by the victim Qí to Ma, a mediation agreement reached by both parties, receipts for compensation, a transfer receipt from the Agricultural Bank of China, documentation of the arrest of Ma and Yang, and Lou's voluntary surrender provided by Xinhua Sub-bureau of Cangzhou City Public Security Bureau, as well as household registration certificates of the defendants Ma, Yang, and Lou, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charge.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained: At approximately 3 PM on December 20, 2014, defendants Gu and Dong went to the entrance of No. 38 Shamao River in this district. Gu acted as the lookout while Dong took advantage of victim Rong's inattentiveness to reach into Rong's jacket pocket and steal a black Xiaomi phone (worth 351 RMB), which he then handed over to Gu. Later, defendant Gu went to No. 23 Shamao River in this district and, taking advantage of victim Wang's inattentiveness, reached into Wang's clothing pocket to steal a gold 32GB Japanese version iPhone 5s (worth 1900 RMB). Around 3 PM on December 20, 2014, the police apprehended defendants Gu and Dong at Shamao River in this district. After the incident, the police recovered the stolen black Xiaomi phone and the gold 32GB Japanese version iPhone 5s, which have been returned to the victims, Rong and Wang, respectively. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Gu and Dong during the court hearing. Additionally, there is evidence from the statements of victims Rong and Wang, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhou, Yi, and Zhang, a price assessment report, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, list of seized items, return list, basic information of disabled persons, disability certificates, photographs, identification records, the account of the arrest, and identity proofs, all of which are sufficient for corroboration.", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: On June 6, 2016, at around 1 p.m., the defendant Cai, in collusion with the defendant Li, went to deliver goods on the second floor of Building 10, Luwan Jiayuan, Chaichao Street, Beilun District, a certain city. They used a key found at the firebox location to open the door of Room 201 and stole a Europura spray machine (valued at RMB 3,807) and a bucket of Nippon paint (valued at RMB 300) that belonged to the victim, Wang. The aforementioned items have been recovered and returned to the victim. After the incident, Cai, under the arrangement of the public security agency, contacted Li via phone and persuaded him to surrender at the police station. On June 9, 2016, Li surrendered at the Chaichao Police Station of the Beilun Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. It was further found that after the incident, Cai and Li compensated the victim Wang for the losses and obtained his forgiveness. Cai and Li raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, which are corroborated by the victim Wang's statements, the identification record and photos, the extraction record, the seizure decision, the seizure list and photos, the return list, the price appraisal conclusion, the letter of forgiveness, the on-site inspection record, the site plan and photos, the vehicle files, the arrest account, population information, among other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in the early morning of June 14, 2013, defendants Wang and Meng, along with Zeng, Yang, Pan, \"Chang\" (all handled in separate cases), and others, conspired to go to the side of No. 139, Dianqian Village, Chengdong Street of this city, to steal a three-wheeled electric vehicle parked on the roadside by the victim, Lin. An appraisal determined that the stolen electric vehicle was valued at 5,290 RMB. On June 16, 2013, defendants Wang and Meng were arrested by public security authorities in Chengbei Street of this city. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed during the trial by defendants Wang and Meng, and were corroborated by the testimony of co-conspirator Zeng, the statement of the victim Lin, testimonies from witnesses Yang, Pan, Jiang Jia, Chen, Mo, Hong, and Jiang Yi, previous criminal judgments, a price appraisal report, identification records, household registration certificates of the defendants, and proof of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it has been found: 1. On October 2, 2013, at approximately 18:00, the defendants Gao and Chen formed a partnership and stole a wallet from Yao’s shoulder bag on Bus No. 199 from Chaoyang Market in a certain city to a certain town in a certain district. The wallet contained over 100 yuan in cash, a resident ID card, bank cards, shopping cards, and other items. 2. On October 7, 2013, at approximately 17:00, the defendants Gao and Chen collaborated again to steal a wallet from Hu’s bag on Bus No. 19 from a certain city's train station to a certain district. The wallet contained over 290 yuan in cash, a resident ID card, and bank cards. 3. On October 16, 2013, at approximately 10:00, the defendants Gao and Chen worked together to steal a wallet from Qin’s bag on Bus No. 199 from a certain town in a certain district to Chaoyang Market in a certain city. The wallet contained over 700 yuan in cash, a resident ID card, and bank cards. Additionally, it has been found that after being brought to justice, the defendants Gao and Chen truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Gao and Chen during the court trial and are sufficiently substantiated by the testimonies of victims Hu, Yao, and Qin, as well as recognition records and investigation process evidence provided by the Public Security Bureau of a certain district in a certain city.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the morning of December 24, 2014, after defendants Zhu and Hu left Company A, they returned to Dormitory Room 1517 located on Fuzhang Road in the Economic Development Zone of Hefei City to collect their luggage. They discovered a white Lenovo Z410-IFI laptop belonging to the victim, Zheng, in the dormitory and conspired to steal the laptop to sell for money. At around 6 PM that evening, Zhu and Hu returned to Room 1517 and stole the laptop from the cabinet. The two took the laptop to Lianhua New Village and sold it for 1,300 yuan. On December 30, 2014, the police apprehended Zhu and Hu at an internet cafe in the Economic Development Zone. Subsequently, the two compensated the victim a total of 4,400 yuan and received the victim’s understanding. According to the appraisal, the stolen Lenovo laptop was valued at 3,887 yuan. To prove the existence of the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has listed the following evidence: the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhu and Hu; the statement of the victim, Zheng; the testimony of the witness, Ye; records of on-site investigation, on-site identification records, and recognition records; audiovisual materials; appraisal opinions; report slips, household registration certificates, case closure process, letter of understanding, and receipts, among other evidence.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of April 18, 2014, the defendants Wu, Xie, and Yan (handled in a separate case), among others, had a dispute with Mo near Tengfeng Textile Co., Ltd. in Honghe Town, Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing City, due to trivial matters. Afterwards, Li (handled in a separate case) and others chased and struck Mo, causing minor injuries to his waist. On June 5 of the same year, knowing that Li and others were suspected of the crime of intentional injury, defendants Wu and Xie, at the request of Li, colluded with Wang and others. Wang went to the Honghe Police Station to falsely claim that he was the one who injured Mo. Later, Wang was criminally detained and arrested on suspicion of intentional injury. It was further found that on January 27, 2015, Wu and Xie surrendered to the public security organs. The above facts were not contested by defendants Wu and Xie during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as the outpatient medical records, discharge records, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, testimony from witnesses Yan, Wang, and Mo, forensic appraisal of human injury degree, on-site investigation materials, identification records, photographs, and explanations of the arrest process.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the morning of July 9, 2014, the defendant Zhou, in collusion with the defendant Liu, went to a certain village in a certain district of a certain city and used a chainsaw to cut down a tree to steal a ginkgo tree that had been requisitioned by the high-tech industrial park of a certain city. When the ginkgo tree was cut down and about to be transported away, they were discovered by the public, and both defendants fled the scene. According to the appraisal, the value of the cut-down ginkgo tree was 18,000 RMB. After the incident, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his crime; defendant Zhou, after being brought to justice, initially failed to truthfully confess the main facts of the crime, but after education, he confessed truthfully and compensated the victim for the loss, obtaining the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the household registration form retrieved by the sub-bureau of a certain public security bureau of a certain city, testimonies from witnesses Yang Jia and Yang Yi, the price assessment certification issued by the price certification center of a certain district in a certain city, records of on-site inspection, examination, and identification created by the sub-bureau of a certain public security bureau, as well as photographed evidence enough to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that: In the early morning of June 22, 2021, defendants Li and Wu (handled in a separate case), after conspiring, went to the vicinity of No. ××, ×× Street, in a certain district of a certain city. Using methods such as pulling car doors, they stole 1,670 RMB and a pack of \"Zhonghua\" (Soft Red) cigarettes, valued at 58.3 RMB, from a BY×××× car. In the afternoon of June 28, 2021, defendants Liu, Li, and Wang conspired to go to No. 13, Waterfront Residence, ×× Street in a certain city. Using methods such as climbing and pushing doors, they broke in and stole more than 12,800 RMB. On July 1, 2021, defendants Liu, Li, and Wang were caught by a certain agency in a certain district of a certain city and later truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. After the incident, defendants Liu and Wang returned 461 RMB and 1,880 RMB, respectively, which had been restituted to the victim Ma by a certain agency. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Li, and Wang during the trial process and are supported by the statements of victims Huang and Ma, as read out and presented in court, the testimony of witness Zhang, the confession and identification records of involved person Wu A, the identification records of defendants Liu, Li, and Wang, the cigarette price certificate issued by Jiang's provincial tobacco company in a certain city's company, surveillance video, the seizure decision, the list of seized and returned items, the case investigation process and situation report provided by a certain agency, this court's criminal judgment, and the identity documents of defendants Liu, Li, and Wang. These pieces of evidence confirm the defendants' in-court confessions on the above facts, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Xiong and Li voluntarily pleaded guilty, admitted the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution agency, and were willing to accept punishment. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Xiong and Li during the trial and are corroborated by evidence such as testimonies from witnesses Yu, Yang, Qian, and others, identification records, and the case-solving report issued by the police officers from the Xicheng Police Station of Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts. Regarding the criminal record of the defendants Xiong and Li, there is supporting evidence in the form of the court's criminal judgment (2018) Su 0482 Xingchu No. 352.", "label": {"Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. In June 2015, the defendants Chen and Wu, without the victim Li's knowledge, fraudulently obtained a credit card from the Bank of Communications using Li's resident ID card (card number 45×××58), and by the time the case was discovered, had collectively used the card to overdraw and cash out over 18,700 RMB in principal. The defendants Chen and Wu had no objections to this fact during the trial, and it was corroborated by the prosecution's in-court presentation of the victim Li's statement, testimonies from the witnesses Wang and Feng, a list of collected evidence and release receipts produced by the Gaoyou Public Security Bureau, photos of the ID card and credit card, credit card application forms and transaction records, as well as surveillance footage. 2. In October 2015, the defendant Chen, without the victim Li's knowledge, fraudulently obtained a credit card from SPD Bank using Li's resident ID card (card number 62×××70), and by the time the case was discovered, had used the card to overdraw 2,000 RMB in principal for consumption. The defendant Chen had no objections to this fact during the trial, and it was corroborated by the prosecution's in-court presentation of the victim Li's statement and the credit card application form and transaction records. On October 28, 2015, the victim Li, after receiving a collection call from the Bank of Communications, reported to the Gaoyou Public Security Bureau. The defendants Chen and Wu were apprehended on December 1, 2015, and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts, having repaid all the outstanding bank debts. After being brought to the case, the defendant Chen assisted the public security organs in apprehending the co-defendant Wu. This fact was corroborated by the prosecution’s in-court presentation of the confessions of both defendants, the victim Li’s statement, a case acceptance registration form, a capture process record, a police dispatch work registration form produced by the Gaoyou Public Security Bureau, bank repayment receipts, and basic population information.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that since March 2013, the defendant Chen, in collusion with the defendant Zhu, illegally traded imitation guns for profit at booth XX in building X, district X, XX City. They jointly rented a warehouse located at No. XX, XX Road, XX City to store the goods and procured them from locations such as a certain place called Hai and other areas, selling them abroad. On May 31, 2013, the public security authorities seized a total of 343,609 imitation guns (worth 402,630 RMB) from the warehouse and Yiwu Port. On June 4, 2013, the defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Yiwu City Mall Police Station. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhu and Chen during the trial. Additionally, these facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Fang and Wang, the list of seized and returned items, the price appraisal report, the imitation gun identification document, the search records and photos, the non-prosecution decision, the document recognizing the voluntary surrender, the arrest process documentation, explanation of the situation, the confessions and identification evidence of defendants Zhu and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that on August 4, 2019, at approximately 23:50, the defendant Jia, after drinking, drove a BYD-branded small car with license plate number ××× along Yuehe North Road in the Kangbashi District from south to north. When reaching a point 60 meters north of the intersection with Keji Street, Jia's vehicle collided with a Toyota-branded small passenger vehicle with license plate number ×××, parked by Deng X from a certain place, on the east side of Yuehe North Road in a non-motor vehicle lane. Subsequently, Jia's vehicle collided with a Volkswagen-branded small car with license plate number ×××, parked by Wei M from a northern place, causing different degrees of damage to three vehicles. After the accident, the defendant Jia abandoned the car and fled, contacting the defendant Chen to act as the driver. Defendant Chen, to cover for the drunk-driving Jia, claimed to the traffic police that he was the driver of the accident vehicle with license plate number ×××. Later, after numerous verifications by the traffic police, it was confirmed that defendant Jia was the driver of the vehicle with license plate number ×××. Tests showed that defendant Jia's blood alcohol content was 170.39mg/100ml, indicating a state of intoxication. It was determined that defendant Jia bore full responsibility for the accident. Defendant Jia has compensated the vehicle owner An X 1,000 yuan for vehicle repair costs.", "label": {"Jia": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On March 29, 2011, defendant Yuan registered the Henan Yuanbang Investment Co., Ltd. at No. 1111, Unit 1, Fuyadongfang, at the intersection of Wangcheng Road and Zhongzhou Road in a certain district of a certain city, and was responsible for the company's daily operations. Defendant Zhang served as the general manager of the company. Defendants Yuan and Zhang, knowing that the company did not have financing qualifications, instructed company employees to use promotional activities and referrals to promise a fixed monthly interest of 2.2%-2.3% to client managers, who would then indirectly attract public deposits at lower interest rates than 2.2%-2.3% monthly from unspecified groups. As of November 28, 2014, they had absorbed funds totaling 123.6725 million yuan, with 45.4505 million yuan remaining unpaid. To support the aforementioned charges, the prosecution submitted evidence to the court, including documentary evidence, witness testimonies, expert opinions, defendant confessions and defenses, and proof of household registration and current performance.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of Lianyungang City accused and charged that between September 14 and September 21, 2014, the defendant Geng, either alone or together with the defendant Lu, repeatedly went to the Huihuang Internet Cafe and Wangshangfei Internet Cafe on Tongguan South Road in a certain district of this city, using the method of pilfering, and stole three mobile phones. Geng committed three cases, with the total amount involved being 2,600 RMB, and Lu committed two cases, with the total amount involved being 2,100 RMB. The details are as follows: 1. At about 8 a.m. on September 14, 2014, defendants Geng and Lu went to the Huihuang Internet Cafe on Tongguan South Road in a certain district, and stole a Xiaomi mobile phone worth 800 RMB that Feng had placed on the computer desk while Feng was sleeping. 2. At about 7 a.m. on September 20, 2014, defendant Geng went to the Huihuang Internet Cafe on Tongguan South Road in a certain district, and stole a Samsung mobile phone worth 500 RMB that Xia had placed on the computer desk while Xia was sleeping. 3. At about 9 p.m. on September 21, 2014, defendants Geng and Lu went to the Wangshangfei Internet Cafe on Tongguan South Road in a certain district, and stole a Samsung mobile phone worth 1,300 RMB that Wu had placed on the computer desk while Wu was sleeping. After the incident, defendants Geng and Lu have fully compensated the economic losses of the three victims.", "label": {"Geng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou accused that on March 7, 2013, at around 19:00, the defendants Li, Li, Chen, along with others, went to the vicinity of Wensan Road and Jingzhou Road in a certain district of this city. They used pickpocketing methods to steal a Coolpad 5870 mobile phone (valued at 669 RMB) from the victim Xu's jacket pocket, and were subsequently caught on the scene by anti-pickpocketing team members. After the crime, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li, Li, Chen during the court trial, and are substantiated by the statements of victim Xu, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Yang, Teng, the list of seized items and photos, return list, explanation of the situation, criminal judgment, proof of release, household registration certificates, arrest records, as well as the identification record and price appraisal conclusion, which together are sufficient for verification.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on November 18, 2015, at around 7 a.m., the defendants Zhou and Xu, along with a man nicknamed \"Little Northeast\" (real name unknown, handled in a separate case), after conspiring, were involved in an incident near Jinlong Road in a certain bay of a certain district of a certain city. Defendants Zhou and Xu were responsible for keeping watch, while \"Little Northeast\" stole an iPhone 6s Plus worth 5,929 RMB from the victim, Cheng's backpack. The stolen goods have been sold, and the proceeds have been squandered. On November 24, 2015, defendants Zhou and Xu were apprehended by public security personnel in a certain bay of a certain district of a certain city. After the case was solved, the family of defendant Zhou compensated the victim Cheng for all economic losses on his behalf. It was also found that the victim Cheng issued a letter of forgiveness expressing understanding for the actions of defendants Zhou and Xu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Xu during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the arrest report, case solution report, situation explanation provided by the public security agency, basic information sheet of personnel, criminal judgment, phone call records, invoices, receipts, letter of forgiveness, the victim Cheng's statement, surveillance footage and screenshots, identification records, case records, price verification report, and the confessions of defendants Zhou and Xu, sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the evening of December 3, 2017, the defendants Song, Cao, Gao, and Gu were having a meal at the Dingli Fast Food Restaurant at Daxing Farm when they noticed that Wang, who had a conflict with Song, was also drinking at the restaurant. Additionally, Wang's car, with license plate ×××, was parked at the restaurant. The four estimated that after drinking, Wang would drive home. To retaliate against Wang, the four discussed and decided that Cao, who had not been drinking, would drive a car with license plate ××× to take Song near Wang's residential area to wait for Wang, intending to create a traffic accident. Gao and Gu stayed at the restaurant to keep an eye on Wang and informed Song by phone when Wang left the fast food restaurant. Around 9 p.m., Song and Cao spotted Wang driving by, and Cao drove forward to deliberately collide with Wang's car. Song then got out of the car to record a video of Wang, while Cao called the police. On December 5, 2017, Wang sought someone to mediate the matter with Song, and Song demanded 100,000 RMB from Wang. Ultimately, Wang gave Song 70,000 RMB. Song kept 60,000 RMB for himself and gave Cao and Gao 10,000 RMB. After the incident, Song's family compensated Wang 70,000 RMB, and Wang forgave Song, Cao, Gao, and Gu.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 1 a.m. on May 28, 2017, defendants Lin and Zhang drove a white \"Fukang\" sedan to Group 7, Village of a certain town in a certain city. Using tools like \"iron pliers\" and a utility knife, they stole a 29 cm diameter, 150 cm high \"Jindanzi\" plant planted by the victim, Zhu. According to the price certification center of a certain city, the \"Jindanzi\" plant involved in the case was valued at 3,200 yuan. It was also found that the police legally seized one white \"Fukang\" sedan involved in the case. These facts were not disputed by defendants Lin and Zhang during the trial, and were supported by evidence submitted by the prosecution, including the case registration form, the account of how the two defendants came to be present, the confessions and defenses of the two defendants, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, on-site identification records and photos, seizure records and inventory, the price certification opinion from the price certification center of a certain city, and the basic information about the permanent resident population of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial investigation, the findings are as follows: \n\nI. Between October 2014 and February 2015, defendant Wu successively provided shelter for Zhou, Lin, Sun, Dou A, and others to consume methamphetamine (referred to as \"ice\"). The specific facts are described as follows: \n\n1. One afternoon in early October 2014, defendant Wu provided shelter for Zhou, Lin, and Sun to consume methamphetamine in the office of the Zhongwu Coating Factory operated by Wu in a certain city.\n\n2. On the night of January 31, 2015, defendant Wu provided shelter for Dou A and Dou B to consume methamphetamine in Wu's home at Unit 1, Room 501, Building 33, Yujing Huating Community, a certain district in a certain city.\n\n3. One night in February 2015, defendant Wu provided shelter for Dou A, Zhou A, and Qin to consume methamphetamine in Wu's home at Unit 1, Room 501, Building 33, Yujing Huating Community, a certain district in a certain city. On March 6, 2015, defendant Wu assisted public security agencies in capturing Li, who was suspected of drug trafficking. Defendant Wu did not dispute the aforementioned facts during the trial process, and these facts are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Sun, Dou A, Dou B, and others, as well as identification transcripts, situation explanations, case-solving reports, proceedings of being brought to justice, and household registration certificates provided by the branch of the public security bureau in a certain district of a certain city. These are sufficient to establish the findings.\n\nII. One night in January 2015, defendant Zhou provided shelter for Lin, Hu, and Sun to consume methamphetamine at Zhou's home in Group 6, Xutai Village, Zizhuang Town, a certain district in a certain city. On March 13, 2015, defendant Zhou voluntarily surrendered himself to the public security agencies. Defendant Zhou and his defense had no objection to the aforementioned facts during the trial process. These facts are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Sun, and others, as well as identification transcripts, situation explanations, case-solving reports, proceedings of being brought to justice, and household registration certificates provided by the branch of the public security bureau in a certain district of a certain city. These are sufficient to establish the findings.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: The defendants, Ji and Yin, after premeditating and agreeing to a 50% share each, set up a casino starting from the night of April 20, 2014. The casino was located first in a mahjong parlor in Hongqi New Village in a district of Taizhou, and then in a room on the first floor of 393-9 Lianyi New Village. The casino operation involved Yin as a lookout, while Ji was responsible for recruiting gamblers to participate in gambling using the \"draw two cards\" method. On the afternoon of April 23, while the defendants Ji and Yin were assembling with individuals like Sheng and others for gambling in the room on the first floor of 393-9 Lianyi New Village, they were caught on the spot by police officers. During this period, the casino profited a total of 12,000 yuan from raking. After the incident, defendant Ji returned the illegal gains of 12,000 yuan. These facts were undisputed by defendants Ji and Yin during the court trial, and they are corroborated by evidence such as the seizure order, testimonies from witnesses Huo, Sheng, Zhang (A), Chen, Su, Zhang (B), Wang, inspection records and photos, identification records, capture process, and administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Ji": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 11 a.m. on September 18, 2013, the defendants Huang and Wang, during their employment at Suqian Hongding Printing and Packaging Co., Ltd. in Tangnan Village, Shuanggou Town, Sihong County, due to their employer Sun's arrears of wages, entered the No. 3 factory workshop of the company by climbing through a window, and stole one terminal and one toothed ball from the Manroland R705 printing machine stored in the workshop. According to the appraisal, the stolen items were valued at a total of 4,200 yuan. It was also found that after the incident, the defendants Huang and Wang voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal activities and those of their accomplice. During the investigation stage, the defendants Huang and Wang returned all the stolen property to the victim. The above facts are not contested by the defendants Huang and Wang during the trial, and are substantiated by the victim Sun's statement, testimonies from witnesses such as Ma who were not present in court, physical evidence photos, price appraisal reports, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the findings.", "label": {"Huang": ["Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: On August 25, 2013, at approximately 16:00, defendants Zhou, Ni, and others, near \"Huanglong Commercial City\" in Guanghua Street, Lucheng District, a certain city, extorted property from the victim Dai on the pretext that Zhou's foot was injured by the car driven by Dai. Victim Dai was compelled to purchase one carton of Zhonghua brand hard-pack cigarettes and two cartons of soft-pack cigarettes for 1,730 RMB and handed them over to defendants Zhou, Ni, and others. On September 3, 2013, at around 9:00, defendant Zhou and Xu at a traffic light in Shuixin Huichang, Shuixin Street, Lucheng District, a certain city, forcibly entered the car driven by victim Chen, claiming that Xu's right foot was injured by the car driven by Chen. They then instructed him to drive to Jin'ou Hotel in Lucheng District, where they met up with defendant Ni and others who were waiting at the hotel, and extorted property from victim Chen. Victim Chen was forced to hand over one carton of Zhonghua brand soft-pack cigarettes (valued at 650 RMB) and 6,500 RMB in cash to Xu and others. After the incident, Ni's family compensated victim Chen 7,300 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhou and Ni during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements of victims Dai and Chen, testimony of witness Ma, transaction details, price appraisal report, identification records and photos, receipt, administrative penalty decision, arrest process, and demographic information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ni": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court, upon examination, established the following facts: On November 5, 2014, at around 6:00 PM, the defendant Fu, due to a prior conflict with the victim Qiao that occurred while driving on the road, contacted the defendant Zhao by phone. Zhao then contacted the defendants Cao and Shi, and they stopped Qiao's vehicle near the Mütong Bridge in a certain town of a certain county and assaulted him, causing injuries. According to the forensic evaluation by the Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center of the county, Qiao sustained a comminuted fracture of the left nasal bone, which constitutes a minor injury of the second degree. It was further established that the four defendants and the victim Qiao reached and fulfilled a civil compensation agreement, and all received Qiao's forgiveness. The defendants Fu, Zhao, Cao, and Shi raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. Additionally, there are explanations regarding their capture, basic resident information on the four defendants, records of mediation, the agreement, receipt slips, a letter of forgiveness, testimonies from witnesses Zhang and Wang, the victim Qiao's statement, the confessions and defenses of the four defendants, the victim’s medical certificate, and the injury assessment report, all of which corroborate the facts sufficiently.", "label": {"Fu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Cao": ["Detention"], "Shi": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou accused that starting from November 2015, defendants Gan and Huang were consecutively employed by the accomplice (handled in a separate case) at the factory located at No. 23, West Eleven Alley, Datang, Shating, Taihe Town, a district in this city. They produced counterfeit shampoos with registered trademarks such as \"Head & Shoulders,\" \"Rejoice,\" and \"Clear.\" On January 5, 2016, at approximately 17:00, the police arrested the two defendants at the above address and seized a batch of counterfeit shampoos with the aforementioned registered trademarks, valued at 90,803 yuan, along with raw materials, empty bottles, hand pumps, and other items. According to the above facts,", "label": {"Gan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on May 12, 2014, the criminal suspect Ping was driving a medium-sized ordinary passenger vehicle with the license plate number Su G×××××, traveling from east to west along the Yi-Yang line in a certain county. Upon reaching the road section in front of the old cotton and linen station in a certain town within the county, the vehicle collided with an electric tricycle driven by Miao, resulting in the deaths of Miao and Sun, as well as vehicle damage, causing a major accident. After abandoning the car and fleeing, suspect Ping arrived at the home of Wang in the East Chengshui Shores of a town in the county, where, after consulting with the defendant Wang, it was decided that Wang would impersonate Ping and surrender to the traffic police brigade of the county public security bureau. Suspect Ping also contacted defendant Jiao by phone to provide false testimony during the accident investigation with the traffic police brigade. On May 12, 2014, at around 8 p.m., to cover up for suspect Ping, defendant Wang surrendered to the public security authorities, falsely claiming to be the driver of the vehicle responsible for the accident. Consequently, on May 13, 2014, the county public security bureau placed Wang under criminal detention on suspicion of traffic accident-related crimes. On May 16, 2014, during the investigation and evidence collection by law enforcement, to cover for suspect Ping, defendant Jiao falsely testified that Wang was the driver responsible for the accident. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Wang and Jiao during the court proceedings. The case is further corroborated by testimonies from non-attending witnesses such as Ping and Jin, the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the detention certificate, the notice of detention, the notice of extended detention, the notice of litigation rights and obligations to witnesses, the false confessions of the defendants, household registration certificates, reports on case initiation and break-through, accounts of arrests, explanation of circumstances, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On May 30, 2015, at approximately 2 a.m., Defendant Jiang contacted Defendant Li to provide drugs. Both defendants jointly sold 0.85 grams of methamphetamine to another person at the intersection of Zhenxing Road in a district of this city, making a profit of 400 yuan. After the transaction was completed, both defendants were caught on the spot by public security personnel. The drugs and drug money have been confiscated.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 3 a.m. on August 19, 2012, defendant Yang, in collusion with defendant Chen, drove an unlicensed Volkswagen Santana to intentionally hit Zhou at the entrance of \"Memories Slow Shake Bar\" in a certain town, causing multiple soft tissue lacerations on Zhou's body. According to forensic identification, the degree of victim Zhou's injury was classified as minor injury. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendant Yang truthfully confessed the criminal facts of himself and his accomplice; after the incident, defendant Chen voluntarily went to the public security organ to turn himself in and truthfully confessed the criminal facts of himself and his accomplice. The aforementioned facts raised no objections from defendants Yang and Chen during the court trial. These facts are supported by the victim Zhou's statement, testimonies of absent witnesses Dai, Pian, Pan, Shen, Shi, Zhu, Jiang, and others, injury photos, medical records, forensic medical injury assessment report, criminal judgment, release certificate, investigation and resolution process of the case, household registration certificate, and related documentary evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district, in a certain city, charges that around 22:50 on June 28, 2020, the defendants Mei and Tian, while drinking with friends at a bar in a certain district of a certain city, got into a brawl after an argument over a trivial matter of toasting. During this time, both sides used beer bottles to hit and smash each other. According to an assessment, the defendant Mei sustained scalp lacerations and facial soft tissue injuries due to external force, both classified as minor injuries. It was further found that after the incident, the defendant Mei proactively called the police and later, upon being notified by phone, voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities, truthfully confessing the facts of the case upon arrival. The defendant Tian also truthfully confessed the facts of the case upon arrival. In the course of the court hearing, the defendants Mei and Tian raised no objections to the above facts, which were further substantiated through their confessions, relevant identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Huang and Zhao, an evidence retrieval notice, an evidence retrieval list, surveillance video, injury assessment notice, and hospital examination records, along with the outpatient and emergency medical records, a forensic appraisal report by Shanghai Kejian Investment Management Co., Ltd., as well as the incident and arrest reports issued by the public security authorities, criminal judgment reports, re-education through labor decisions, administrative penalty decisions, release certificates, and the defendants’ household registration data, collectively corroborating the validity of the charges.", "label": {"Mei": ["Detention"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accused that, starting in 2013, defendant Li, without having the necessary formulation qualifications, privately used traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine ingredients to grind into medicinal powder, claiming it mainly treated rheumatism, and sold it multiple times to defendant Zhang, totaling 15 kilograms. Defendant Zhang, without having the qualifications to sell pharmaceuticals, encapsulated the 15 kilograms of medicinal powder purchased from defendant Li and sold them in and around his residence. The public prosecution agency submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and defendant confessions to the court to support the charges.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 16:00 on January 23, 2015, the defendants Cha and Hu went to a certain district in a city and entered Room 902 of Unit 1 in Building 7 of Jianlongyuan on Zhongkang North Road by climbing the balcony from the rooftop. They stole an Apple-brand laptop belonging to the victim, Wang. (An appraisal confirmed its value at 8,112 RMB.) After succeeding, the defendants Cha and Hu sold the stolen laptop to another person. On the evening of January 28, 2015, the defendants Cha and Hu were apprehended by the police in a certain district in the city. The laptop involved in the case was recovered by the police. The prosecution presented evidence in court regarding the aforementioned facts, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, expert opinions, inspection, verification, identification records, and audio-visual materials. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the defendants Cha and Hu, by disregarding national laws, secretly stole others' property for the purpose of illegal possession, with a significant amount involved. Their actions violate Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. They should be criminally prosecuted for x crime according to the law, and the court is requested to punish them accordingly under the law. The defendants Cha and Hu have both agreed with the facts of the crime alleged by the prosecution and confessed in court. The prosecution's accusation that the defendants Cha and Hu committed theft is clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, which the court acknowledges.", "label": {"Cha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the investigation, it was found that between November 2012 and August 30, 2013, defendant Zhao hired defendant Wang to work at his duck processing factory located at the entrance of Shiju Village in a certain county, handling the slaughtering and feather removal of ducks. During the feather removal process, because the fine feathers on some ducks were difficult to remove completely, for convenience, defendant Zhao purchased industrial rosin and instructed defendant Wang to illegally use industrial rosin to deal with the ducks' fine feathers. The ducks, after feather removal, were then sold to unspecified people. On August 30, 2013, the processing shed where defendants Zhao and Wang processed ducks was discovered by the public security authorities, who seized the industrial rosin in use on the spot and arrested defendant Wang at the same time. After the incident, defendant Zhao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Wang during the court hearing. Additionally, there are supporting evidence such as identification documents of defendants Zhao and Wang, investigation reports, lists of seized items, Technical Service Report No. 0842 from the Wenzhou Institute of Industrial Science Research Analysis and Testing Center, on-site search records, photos from the on-site search by the public security bureau of a certain county, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Defendants Chen and Wang were both guards at Hangzhou Certain Luggage Co., Ltd. (Certain Address, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City), responsible for managing the entry and exit of personnel and vehicles at the main gate. \n\n1. One early morning in May 2013, defendant Chen, together with Lu (security team leader, handled in a separate case), premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and steal 2 pieces of luggage, with stolen goods valued at 900 yuan. \n\n2. One early morning in May of the same year, defendants Chen and Wang premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and throw 9 stolen pieces of luggage over the company wall. Wang was outside the company wall to receive them and transported the stolen goods back to their residence, with stolen goods valued at 4050 yuan. \n\n3. One early morning in June of the same year, defendant Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop and steal 11 pieces of luggage, with stolen goods valued at 4950 yuan. \n\n4. One early morning in July of the same year, defendants Chen, Wang, and Lu premeditated; Chen took advantage of his work shift to sneak into the workshop, steal 11 pieces of luggage, and Wang opened the main gate at the company guard post. Then Chen transported the stolen goods out of the factory on an electric vehicle, with stolen goods valued at 4950 yuan. \n\nAfter the incident, the public security organs retrieved 8 pieces of luggage that Chen had sold from a luggage store at a certain address on Beida Street, Linping, Yuhang District. According to the appraisal, this part of the stolen goods was valued at 4150 yuan.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between July 2014 and September 2015, the defendants Hu and Chen sold unapproved \"Meng's Rheumatism Capsules\" and \"Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules\" at Kangqiao Pharmacy in Qiaoshang Market, Tongshan Town, in a certain district of a certain city. The sales amounted to approximately 7,200 yuan, with illegal gains of about 2,000 yuan. After appraisal, \"Meng's Rheumatism Capsules\" and \"Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules\" were found to be counterfeit drugs. It was also discovered that after being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The defendants Hu and Chen raised no objections during the court hearing regarding these facts. The facts are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Liu, Han, and others, bank transaction details, accounting books (copies), a reply letter from the Food and Drug Administration of Binzhou City, Shandong Province, confirming the authenticity of Meng's Rheumatism Capsules and Compound Cough and Asthma Capsules, household registration certificates, and evidence concerning the case and the apprehension of the defendants, which are sufficient to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges: On October 14, 2011, at around 22:00, police officers conducted an inspection of Room 604, Building 1, Zhifu Garden, a district, and discovered several suspected narcotics in a corner of the kitchen, along with a homemade kettle. The defendants, Zhu and Liang, were found illegally possessing narcotics inside the residence. After examination, the seized white lump substance weighed 13.3 grams and tested positive for heroin; the white crystalline substance weighed 2.29 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine; the white powder substance weighed 62.7 grams and tested positive for caffeine; the red pill-shaped substance weighed 0.37 grams and tested positive for caffeine. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented or read in court the following evidence: 1. Physical and documentary evidence: illegally possessed narcotics, list of seized items, receipt for suspected narcotics, and identification materials; 2. Witness testimony: testimony and identification record of witness Liu; 3. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of defendants Zhu and Liang; 4. Expert conclusion: test report; 5. On-site inspection records and photos.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused that on the afternoon of October 28, 2013, defendants Zhou and Wei, together with Ding (handled in another case), conspired and pretended to introduce Ding for work to the victims Li and Zhang at Tianying Hotel, Hexing Road, Kunshan City. After collecting an introduction fee of 14,000 RMB from them, the three took advantage of Li, Zhang, and others' unawareness, and drove away from the scene. On November 1, 2013, defendants Zhou and Wei voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities, truthfully confessed the criminal facts, and returned all the illicit money.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 2 p.m. on September 4, 2014, the victim Puyang and others assaulted the defendant Shi over a gambling dispute. Holding a grudge, at around 5 p.m. on the same day, defendant Shi, seeking an explanation, gathered the defendant Wang and through Wang, gathered defendant Xu and more than ten others. They armed themselves with spears, steel pipes, and other weapons, and drove five cars to the south side of the road in front of the Jiaolong Hotel in Dongba Town, a district of a certain city. After failing to negotiate with Puyang and others, the group on Shi’s side chased and assaulted Puyang, Xu, and others with weapons. During the incident, defendant Xu and others intercepted Xu and attacked him with punches and kicks. On October 24 and December 9, 2014, defendants Shi and Xu were respectively apprehended by public security authorities; on November 10 of the same year, defendant Wang turned himself in to the Gaochun Branch of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau. After coming to the case, all three defendants truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court by the public prosecution agency, which this court acknowledges: 1. Statements from victims Xu, Puyang, Zhao, and Sun about being chased with weapons and scattering in all directions. 2. Testimony of the witness Gao. 3. Confessions and defenses from the defendants in a separate case, Li and Zhang. 4. Identification records and photos. 5. On-site investigation records and photos from the Gaochun Branch of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau. 6. Capture and confession process descriptions, case acceptance registration forms, and filing decision letters provided by the Gaochun Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau. 7. Household registration materials of defendants Shi, Wang, Xu, and their confessions. Defendants Shi, Wang, Xu did not object to the above facts and evidence, made no defense, and expressed their willingness to plead guilty.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate charges that on September 12, 2016, at around 4 PM, the victims Ma, A, and B Ma, along with others, were singing at \"Good Voice\" KTV in a town in Yangxin County. They had a verbal dispute with Liang Jia over a drinking toast. Liang Jia then called the defendants Liang and Shi, leading to another confrontation with Ma and others. Later, Liang called the defendant Liu and Shi Jia (handled in a separate case), while Liu called Liu Jia, and Shi Jia called others. They rushed to the vicinity of Tianfu Plaza near the KTV. Liang and Shi Jia wielded wooden sticks, and Shi used beer bottles to engage in a brawl with Ma, A Ma, and B Ma. Defendant Liu also punched and kicked A Ma and others, and threw A Ma to the ground. Forensic identification determined that Ma, A Ma, and B Ma sustained minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Liang and Liu surrendered themselves at the Baisha Police Station of the Yangxin County Public Security Bureau. Following the incident, Liang and Liu compensated the three victims with a total of 30,000 RMB for medical expenses and other costs, gaining the victims' understanding.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: On March 26, 2020, the defendant Liu went to visit the defendant Song at the room on the east side of the ground floor at No. 198 Xuyuan, a village in a town of a district in a city, rented by the defendant Song. At around 14:00 the same day, defendant Song and defendant Liu went to the room on the west side of the ground floor there and stole property, taking a gold ring and coins from a drawer in the room belonging to the victim Xu. Later, defendant Song also went to the room on the west side of the second floor and the room on the west side of the ground floor and stole 2 packs of cigarettes from a certain place, 1 bottle of white liquor, and 1 plastic water kettle. During this period, defendants Song and Liu also instigated Wang (handled separately) to go to the room on the west side of the second floor and steal 1 carton of Zhonghua brand cigarettes. Later, defendant Song again went to the room on the west side of the ground floor and stole 1 bottle of yellow wine. On March 27, 2020, the police seized from defendant Liu 1 gold ring (valued at 3,915 RMB, all currencies mentioned below are in RMB), 127 coins with a denomination of 1 RMB, 1 plastic water kettle, 1 bottle of white liquor (valued at 48 RMB), 1 bottle of yellow wine (valued at 14 RMB), 1 pack of cigarettes from a certain place (valued at 23 RMB) and 1 carton of Zhonghua brand cigarettes (valued at 450 RMB); all the above items have been returned to the victim Xu. After being brought to the case, defendant Song and defendant Liu truthfully confessed the above facts. Therefore,", "label": {"Song": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of April 22, 2013, the defendants Lin and Wu, after prior conspiracy, went to the building No. 50 in Qingkou East District, Jiangdong Street, in this city. Defendant Wu acted as a lookout downstairs while defendant Lin used technical unlocking methods to enter victim Ouyang's home in Unit 1, Room 302. They stole an HP V3000 laptop (valued at 1,200 RMB) and then fled the scene. The stolen items have since been recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin and Wu during the trial and are corroborated by the statement of the victim Ouyang, the seizure and return item list, the price appraisal report, the on-site identification transcript, the inspection record, the criminal judgment, the release certificate, the capture process, as well as the confessions and identification documents of defendants Lin and Wu, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Anhui Province charges: In late February 2014, defendants Hu and Chen each invested 10,000 yuan, jointly purchasing trees on a mountain contracted by Wang for 20,000 yuan. This mountain is located at Duimen Mountain in a certain village, town, and county. Later, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, Hu and Chen organized villagers to cut down some trees on the mountain. According to the forestry bureau of the county, the volume of trees felled on this mountain amounted to 28.5 cubic meters. On October 28, 2014, Hu and Chen were brought in after being notified by telephone by the police from Gongshan Police Station of the county’s Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Chen during the trial, and were proven by the presentation of evidence in court, including documentary evidence such as records of harvested site data collection, calculations of harvested timber volume, land status registration forms, lease contracts, household registration data of the defendants, and accounts of how they were brought in; witness testimonies from individuals such as Wang and others; confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Chen; appraisal opinion documented in appraisal report Southforest Appraisal No. 2014-01; site inspection and examination records by the public security authorities, among other evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On May 25, 2015, defendants Yu and Yuan, in order to seek illegal profits, knowingly allowed individuals such as \"A\" and others to use bank cards for criminal activities. They still organized Liu and others to issue 8 bank savings cards at a certain location, which were subsequently acquired, held, and sold. On May 27, 2015, a fraud gang used one of the Agricultural Bank of China cards sold by Yu and others (issued to Liu) to commit fraud, deceiving victim Zhang out of 40,000 RMB. It was further found that after the incident, the 40,000 RMB that victim Zhang was deceived out of was returned by Liu and others. After being brought to justice, defendants Yu and Yuan truthfully confessed to the main facts of the crime. These facts were not contested by defendants Yu and Yuan during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of victim Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Liu Jia and Liu Yi, identification records, envelopes, scratch-off cards, remittance receipts, bank account details, bank account opening information, debit card opening information, surveillance video of bank card processing, withdrawal videos, arrest process, and household registration proofs, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: 1. In late April 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu went to the home of He in Dafu Village, Reye Town, this county, and stole 3,000 yuan in cash from the bedside cabinet in the second-floor bedroom. The stolen money was split between the two. 2. In early May 2016, defendant Zhu climbed through a window to enter Liu Jia's home in Dafu Village, Reye Town, this county, and stole over 300 yuan in coins and 200 yuan in older version 100-yuan bills from the first-floor bedroom. 3. In mid-May 2016, defendant Zhu once again climbed through a window to enter the home of the victim He, and stole a gold necklace and a gold pendant from a cabinet in the first-floor bathroom. Appraisal determined the stolen gold jewelry was valued at 7,892 yuan. 4. On June 4, 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu went to the home of Lü at No. 40, Pan Village, Jiafa Town, this county to commit theft, but fled the scene when discovered. In summary, the amount involved for defendant Zhu is 11,392 yuan; for defendant Liu, it is 3,000 yuan. On June 4, 2016, defendants Zhu and Liu were apprehended by the police. After the incident, relatives of defendants Zhu and Liu returned the stolen money on their behalf and received forgiveness from the victims He and Liu Jia. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Liu during the trial. The defendants' household registration information, the process of their appearance in court, statements from each victim, records of identification and recognition, appraisal opinions, receipts, and letters of forgiveness from the victims serve as sufficient evidence to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xingqing District, a certain city, charged that at around 8:00 on August 4, 2015, defendants Di and Wu went to Haibao Market in Xingqing District of a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Zhang's unawareness while pushing a cart to buy groceries, they stole a wallet from Zhang's handbag, which contained 221.7 yuan in cash. Later, they were apprehended by patrol police. All the stolen funds and items were recovered and returned.", "label": {"Di": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the evening of October 29, 2015, at around 9:00 PM, defendants Jiang, Huang, and Su conspired and went to Liugang Bridge on the Dongyong section of South Road in this district. They held a knife to the neck of victim Jin to threaten him and robbed him of a VIVO mobile phone (worth 674 RMB) and a black backpack. The backpack contained more than 140 RMB in cash, a ring (value unknown), an ID card, a bank card, and other belongings. On the same day, the police arrested defendants Jiang, Huang, and Su.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution's accusation, from February 2012 to April 18 of the same year, the defendants Wang and Yu, in order to obtain illegal profits, repeatedly accepted \"Mark Six\" bets from individuals such as Shu, Jin, Gu, and Lu in a tobacco and alcohol shop they operated in a certain village in this city. The total amount of bets accepted reached more than 30,000 RMB, and they handed over the aforementioned betting funds to their superiors, \"Captain A\" and \"Guohui\" (whose full names are unknown and are being handled in another case). On April 18, 2012, the defendant Yu was arrested by the local police; on January 15, 2013, the defendant Wang voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Yu during the court trial and are substantiated by documentary evidence such as \"Mark Six\" account books, betting lists, withdrawal records, special receipts for temporarily seized items, photographic explanations, accounts of the arrest, details of the surrender, household registration certificates, criminal judgment documents, and witness testimonies from Shu, Jin, Gu, Lu, Zheng Jia, and Zheng Yi, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At approximately 12:30 AM on September 18, 2013, the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He had an argument with Tang and others over trivial matters at Starlight Avenue KTV in Songmen Town, Wenling City. Later, at the entrance of Starlight Avenue KTV, defendants Lin, Zhou, and He, among others, used tools such as stones and dustpans to assault the victim Tang. According to the assessment, the facial injuries of the victim Tang were caused by external force and were classified as minor injuries. At around 5:00 PM on November 22, 2013, police officers from the Fuding Station Police Station of the Fuzhou Railway Public Security Department in Fujian Province arrested defendant Zhou at the Fuding Railway Station. On December 18, 2013, defendants Lin and He voluntarily surrendered to the Jiao Mountain Frontier Police Station of the Wenling Public Security Bureau. After arriving in the case, the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He truthfully confessed their involvement in the incident and jointly compensated the victim Tang a total of 45,000 yuan for medical expenses and lost wages. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lin, Zhou, and He during the trial and are corroborated by the testimony of witnesses Su and Qiu, the statement of the victim Tang, the mediation agreement, the letter of understanding, the forensic assessment report on the degree of bodily injury, identification records, monitoring video discs, the defendants' household registration certificates, proof of arrest, and certification issued by the Jiao Mountain Frontier Police Station of the Wenling Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Wen and Wang have no objection to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution, but only request the court for leniency in sentencing. The facts of the case as determined through the trial are consistent with the contents charged by the prosecution. The evidence proving the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as population information, the process of apprehension, previous conviction records, and administrative penalty decisions; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Lu, Ni, and Chen; 3. Confessions and defenses of the defendants Wen and Wang; 4. Identification records. The above evidence corroborates each other and is sufficient for determination. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient.", "label": {"Wen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Between July 22, 2016, and October 11, 2016, defendants Gu and Lu conspired to commit theft, collaborating in division of labor to steal three times at \"Yujian Internet Cafe\" and \"Meiguan Internet Cafe.\" The specific facts are as follows: 1. On October 11, 2016, at around 3 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the \"Meiguan\" Internet Cafe on Renai Street in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a gold iPhone 6s from the victim, Huang. After the theft, they were apprehended by police on the same day near the community altar on Tongren Street in the same town, and an iPhone 6s was seized from Gu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the town, the stolen phone was valued at 3,427 RMB. 2. On October 11, 2016, at about 1 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the \"Yujian Internet Cafe\" in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a white Coolpad phone from the victim, Xie. After the theft, they were apprehended by police on the same day near the community altar on Tongren Street in the same town, and a white Coolpad phone was seized from Lu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the town, the stolen phone was valued at 230 RMB. 3. On July 22, 2016, at about 4 PM, defendant Lu rode a motorcycle carrying defendant Gu to the \"Yujian Internet Cafe\" in a certain town of a certain county, stealing a white iPhone 5s from the victim, Lin. Later, the phone was sold to a man nicknamed \"Gao Si.\" The above facts are corroborated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, appraisal opinions, photo identifications of the crime scenes, audio-visual materials, statements from victims, and confessions from the defendants as provided by the prosecution.", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial was concluded, it was found that around 4 a.m. on June 1, 2013, defendants Chen, Zou, and Tang, carrying tools for committing the crime, arrived at the first floor of No. 62, Jinding Beisha Shangbei Village, a town in the High-tech Zone of this city. Using a \"fish-hooking\" method from outside the window, they stole a black Apple 3 phone placed on a table in the room by the victim, Deng, and fled. As the three defendants fled, they hid the stolen black Apple 3 phone in a nearby pork stall. After the victim, Deng, caught up with the three defendants, he found the Apple 3 phone in the pork stall. Subsequently, Deng reported to the police. The three defendants waited at the scene and did not resist arrest when apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, they truthfully confessed to the theft crime. During the arrest, the police found a switchblade on each of the defendants, Zou and Tang. Upon appraisal, the involved phone was valued at 540 RMB, and the knives found on defendants Zou and Tang were determined to be controlled knives. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen, Tang, and Zou during the court trial. There is corroborating evidence, including the victim Deng's statement, the arrest process, household registration information, search records, a list of seized and returned items, testimonials, a valuation appraisal of the involved property, an appraisal opinion notice, and a certification of the controlled knives, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On November 21, 2015, at around 19:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the riverside next to the \"Nayong Grilled Pot Restaurant\" in a certain village of Yangming Street in this city, and sold 2 small packets of heroin for 200 RMB to Xiao (handled in a separate case). 2. On the 22nd of the same month, at around 14:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the aforementioned location and sold 1 small packet of heroin for 100 RMB to Xiao. 3. On the afternoon of the 23rd of the same month, defendants Luo and Zhou, in collusion, went to the aforementioned location and consecutively sold 2 small packets of heroin for 100 RMB each to Xiao. 4. On the 24th of the same month, at around 16:00, defendants Luo and Zhou, after prior telephone contact, colluded to go to the second floor of the \"Nayong Grilled Pot Restaurant\" in a certain village of Yangming Street in this city, and sold 1 small packet of heroin for 600 RMB to Xiao. Xiao gave part of this heroin to defendants Luo and Zhou for consumption and sold the remaining heroin to Li A. Subsequently, defendants Luo, Zhou, Xiao, and Li A were arrested by local police officers, and 1 packet of heroin was seized from both Li A and defendant Zhou. According to the appraisal, the heroin seized from Li A had a net weight of 0.5767 grams, and the heroin seized from defendant Zhou had a net weight of 0.0291 grams, both containing heroin components. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On January 17, 2016, at around 1 a.m., defendants Huang and Zhang, together with \"Xia\" and \"Zhao\" (both handled in separate cases), without any reason, assaulted the victims Jiang, Xu, and You Yi, who were chatting downstairs of the Commercial Building on Yan'an North Road in Xiangcheng District, in a certain city. This resulted in victims Jiang and Xu being injured. According to forensic identification: the degree of injury to victim Jiang was assessed as minor injury of the first degree, and the degree of injury to victim Xu was assessed as minor injury. On March 16, 2016, defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: \n\n1. Theft criminal facts: At about 2 a.m. on December 6, 2015, defendant Liu went to the courtyard of district two of a certain village in the urban street office of Rushan City, and, taking advantage of the absence of anyone, stole a Passat B5 sedan worth 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.\n\nConcealing or hiding the criminal proceeds facts: \n\n1. At approximately 7 p.m. on December 29, 2015, defendant Yu, knowing the goods were illegally obtained by others, still purchased the Passat B5 sedan without any formalities that Liu had stolen for 6,200 RMB in a gas station near the highway entrance of a certain city, valued at 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.\n\n2. At approximately 8 p.m. on January 9, 2016, defendant Liang, knowing the goods were illegally obtained by others, still purchased the Passat B5 sedan without any formalities for 7,300 RMB from Yu near the old bus station in Muping District of a certain city, valued at 10,000.00 RMB according to appraisal.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain region charged that from September to November 2019, the defendant Zhang, in collaboration with Liu, purchased over 2,000 registered SIM cards and nine sets of bank card packages (registered SIM cards, bank cards, U-disk tokens) at low prices. They sold these at high prices to a person named Wang A (currently at large). Defendant Zhang illegally profited over 20,000 yuan, and defendant Liu illegally profited over 15,000 yuan. The SIM cards sold by the defendants were later used by others for illegal and criminal activities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Zhang during the court trial. Documentary evidence includes: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, documents on compulsory measures, front and side photos of the defendants, household registration certificates, proof of previous offenses, online comparison inquiry, arrest process, personal safety inspection record, health examination form upon entry, case material clues provided by Wenshan Public Security Bureau, details of bank transactions, on-site inspection reports and photos, urine inspection records and photos, notification record, material evidence photos, search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure list, electronic evidence inspection work record, WeChat payment transaction details, WeChat bills, explanatory note, ID card, marriage certificate, copy of household register, list of items transferred with the case. Testimonies from witnesses Lu, Li, Wang, He, Du, Zeng, Huang, Deng, Sun, Xiao, and others, as well as the confessions of defendants Liu and Zhang, provide sufficient evidence to establish these facts. A birth medical certificate submitted by defendant Liu's defense lawyer at the trial is unrelated to this case and will not be considered.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At approximately 2:00 am on April 29, 2015, defendants E and Sun, after planning, carried tools such as pliers and gloves for committing the crime. They went to the temporary residence of the victim Pan in Building 8 of the Riverside View neighborhood in a certain city of a certain province. Defendant Sun was responsible for keeping watch while defendant E entered the residence and stole a white Lenovo mobile phone. After succeeding, the two then went to the residence of the victim Wang in Apartment 102 of Building 8 in a certain city's Rongqiao City. Defendant E kept watch while defendant Sun entered the residence and stole two bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor, two cartons of Zhonghua brand soft-pack cigarettes, and one carton of Diamond Hehua brand cigarettes. While keeping watch, defendant E also went to the residence of victim He in No. 15 Yantou, Shimen Village, Honglu Street, a certain city, and stole a UNISCOPE mobile phone. After the incident, the police seized the stolen Lenovo mobile phone, UNISCOPE mobile phone, and seven packs of Zhonghua brand soft-pack cigarettes, which have now been returned to the victims Pan, He, and Wang. According to the price appraisal by the Price Appraisal Center of a certain city, the total value of the stolen items involved in the case was 4,140 yuan. In response to the above charges, the public prosecution agency submitted corresponding evidence to the court, and through evidence presentation and cross-examination,", "label": {"E": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a lawful trial, it was found that at around 16:00 on September 10, 2014, defendants Zhang and Li were driving on the east side road of Building 228 in Sanyi Village, Lubei District, of a certain city. Their dissatisfaction arose when the victim, Yan, was blocking the road. After the victim Yan made way for them, defendant Zhang continued to verbally abuse Yan loudly and, together with defendant Li, physically assaulted the victim Yan. According to the assessment, victim Yan suffered minor injuries classified as level 2. On September 18, 2014, defendants Zhang and Li compensated the victim Yan for all economic losses, obtaining forgiveness from the victim. These facts were uncontested by defendants Zhang and Li during the court hearing and were substantiated by documentary evidence such as the source of the case, the reconciliation agreement, victim Yan's statement, testimonies from witnesses Dong and Wang, among others, and the forensic appraisal, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 4 a.m. on January 15, 2014, defendants Fei and Li, together with \"Sheng Mo\" (identity unknown, to be dealt with in a separate case), went to Room 13, Unit 1, \"Industrial and Commercial Dormitory\" in a certain bay, a certain road, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the premises by picking the lock with a tin sheet and stole one \"Lenovo\" B450, E49, and Thinkpad L430 laptop each (the three laptops valued at a total of 3,849 RMB), one \"Sony\" M35H mobile phone (valued at 975 RMB), and 300 RMB in cash from victims including Xiang. Defendants Fei and Li were later arrested by the public security authorities. The stolen goods were resold for money, which was then squandered. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Fei and Li during the trial process and are corroborated by the arrest and case-solving report and case handling instructions issued by the sub-bureau of the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city; the victim Xiang's report and statement materials; the price appraisal certificate; identification records; on-site video surveillance footage and screenshots; criminal record materials; and other materials, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fei and Li, which are sufficient to conclude.", "label": {"Fei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that at around 23:00 on April 2, 2013, defendants Yang and Zhang sold four packages of the first-class controlled psychotropic substance ketamine, with a net weight of 2.2 grams, wrapped in plastic bags, to Zhong near Zhongjia Village Primary School in Hanyang District, Wuhan, for a price of 200 RMB, and were subsequently caught on the spot by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Zhang during the trial and are substantiated by evidence such as the capture and case resolution reports issued by the public security agencies, testimony from witness Zhong, photographs of physical evidence, drug test identification report, drug inventory list, list of seized items, criminal judgment, and the confessions of defendants Yang and Zhang, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in March 2014, the defendant You established an unlicensed electroplating processing plant in Lianmeng Village, Tingtian Street, Ruian City. In mid-April 2014, the defendant Yuan joined this electroplating processing plant and agreed with the defendant You on a commission based on the production volume. Defendant Yuan hired Luo to be responsible for production, while defendant You was in charge of product business. During the production period, wastewater generated from electroplating was directly discharged without being treated by environmental protection facilities. On May 6, 2014, this electroplating processing plant was discovered by the Environmental Protection Bureau of Ruian City. After sampling the electroplating wastewater, monitoring revealed a total zinc content of 162mg/L and a total chromium content of 7.89mg/L, exceeding the discharge standards by over 100 times and over 7 times, respectively. On May 6, 2014, defendant Yuan was summoned by the public security organ, and on May 23, 2014, defendant You turned himself in to the public security organ and truthfully confessed to the above facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and You during the trial and are confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Luo and Chen, the monitoring report, the acknowledgment of the monitoring report, on-site inspection records, on-site photos, an explanation of the case, household registration certificates, and other evidence adequate to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "You": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: From April or May 2011 to the present, the defendants Xie and Xu, knowing that the rosin used is harmful to human health, continued to use rosin to process hair removal on pig heads in a rented house located at No. 22, a natural village in a certain town, a certain village of Changxing County. They then roasted the pig heads into pork head meat for sale. At 7 AM on October 31, 2013, police officers from Changxing County Public Security Bureau confiscated the rosin used for hair removal by Xie and Xu, as well as the processed pork head meat, from the rented house at No. 22, a natural village in a certain town, a certain village. According to the Wenzhou Institute of Industrial Science's appraisal, the rosin confiscated on site was industrial rosin. The Changxing County Health Bureau replied that rosin (for industrial use) is not a food additive or processing aid defined by the state, and is a non-edible substance prohibited from being added to food, as it is harmful to human health.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 20:00 on March 19, 2014, the defendants Tan and Zhu were drinking with Ding at Ding's rented apartment behind the Sunan County Health Bureau. At around 23:30, the two left separately, each riding a motorcycle, and headed to a barbecue stall at the crossroads of the county town to eat barbecue. They were intercepted by the traffic police of the Sunan County Public Security Bureau while traveling on Baiyin Road to the county town crossroads. According to the identification by the Gansu Forensic Medical Appraisal Institute, Tan's blood alcohol content was 258 mg/100ml, and Zhu's blood alcohol content was 143 mg/100ml at the time of interception. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Tan and Zhu during the court trial. Furthermore, these facts were corroborated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Zhu, witness testimonies from Ma and Ding, the Sunan County Public Security Bureau traffic police report on the incident, as well as photographs of blood sample collection, blood sample extraction registration forms, blood alcohol content test reports, copies of the defendants' identification cards, residence information inquiry forms, and copies of their driving licenses, all of which were sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that the defendants Li and Shao, on August 20, 2014, at approximately 11:00, without obtaining construction qualifications, undertook the construction of a chicken coop for Zhao (handled in a separate case), which was built without approval at a certain location in the western southern area of an administrative village in a town in a certain district of a certain city. During the construction process, due to the failure to take any safety protective measures, the construction worker Ren was electrocuted and died. To support the aforementioned allegations, the prosecution presented the confessions and defenses of Li and Shao, testimonies from witnesses Dong and Sun, as well as forensic autopsy reports conducted by the Peony Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau on the deceased.", "label": {"Shao": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in August 2013, the defendant Zheng rented a house in Building 55, Section 13, Guandi area within this jurisdiction, where he organized gambling using gaming machines and employed the defendants Cao and Zhang at the casino to assist and be responsible for collecting money, with a monthly salary of 3,000 RMB in cash. On September 24 of the same year, at approximately 1 PM, the defendants Zheng, Cao, Zhang, as well as more than ten gamblers including Zeng and Sun, were caught by the public security authorities gambling at the aforementioned location. The police seized gambling funds totaling over 19,000 RMB on the spot. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zheng, Cao, and Zhang during the trial, and were sufficiently proven by the acceptance registration form, the arrest and case-solving process, witness testimonies, the on-site inspection transcript and photos, the identification transcript and photos, the expert opinion on electronic gaming equipment, the evidence preservation decision, the evidence preservation list, the confiscated items list, the administrative penalty decision, video materials, the household registration certificates of the three defendants, and the confessions and defenses of the three defendants.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on June 15, 2015, the defendant Wei had a dispute with Luo and asked the defendant Huang to bring people to teach Luo a lesson, but instructed not to bring knives or other tools. They also rented an SUV in a certain district for defendant Huang's use. On the morning of the next day, around 9 AM, defendant Huang received a call from defendant Wei, drove the SUV, and picked up \"Li\" and \"Lu\" (both are handled in separate cases) to meet defendant Wei at a certain location. Then, defendant Wei led defendant Huang and others to a place near Luo's storefront. Defendant Huang, along with \"Li\" and \"Lu,\" entered the storefront carrying pickaxe handles. While Luo was running out, he was injured by defendant Huang and others during the chase. On July 3, 2015, an assessment by Wuhan Ping’an Forensic Appraisal Center determined that Luo's main injury was a comminuted fracture of the fibula head, and the bodily injury was categorized as minor injury Level 1. It was also found that the families of defendants Huang and Wei compensated the victim Luo for economic losses amounting to RMB 90,000 on December 10, 2015, and the victim expressed understanding of the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Huang and Wei during the trial and were supported by evidence including: 1. two identification records; 2. one appraisal opinion; 3. identification photos, explanations of identified individuals' identities, 2 copies, seizure list, vehicle rental contract, two copies of population information forms, receipt, letter of understanding, agreement, proof of the case process, and other documentary evidence; 4. testimonies from witnesses Wang A, Wang B, Cheng, Zuo, Zhang A, and Zhang B; 5. the victim Luo's statement; 6. the confessions and defenses of defendants Wei and Huang, all of which were sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on the afternoon of April 18, 2016, at around 3 PM, the defendant Dong, in collusion with the defendant Zhang, used pickpocketing to steal a white Coolpad phone from the left coat pocket of the victim, Li, near the Xinyu Garden Residential Area vegetable market in Qian Guo County. On August 8, 2016, at approximately 2:30 PM, the defendant Zhang stole a black shoulder bag containing over 120 yuan in cash from the Lingxiu Fashion Shop in the underground mall of the Qian Guo County Central Mall. On October 24, 2016, at around 4 PM, the defendant Dong used pickpocketing to steal a gold Golden Oar GN5001 phone from the right jacket pocket of the victim, Zhou, near the Xinyu Garden Residential Area vegetable market in Qian Guo County. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of Qian Guo County, the stolen phone was valued at 500 RMB. To support the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided evidence in court: (1) documentary evidence; (2) statements from victims Li, Wang, and Zhou; (3) confessions and defenses from the defendants Zhang and Dong; (4) expert opinions; (5) audio-visual materials, among other evidence.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused: From late January 2016 to February 12, Wang and Hu, the defendants, in order to make illegal profits, provided a venue and gambling equipment at the old Hu Chess and Card Room on Yanshan Road, Huaqiao Street, Huaqiao Town, a certain county. They allowed others to gamble using games such as \"Twenty-Eight\" and \"Bullfighting,\" setting up more than 40 gambling sessions. The two made illegal profits of more than 10,000 yuan through \"rake-offs.\" After the incident, the defendant Wang was arrested and brought to justice, while the defendant Hu surrendered voluntarily. Both were able to truthfully confess their criminal acts after coming forward. The defendants Wang and Hu have returned the illegal gains of 11,000 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Hu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Hu Jia, Zhang, Zhao, and Fang; documentation including household registration information, previous convictions statement, cash deposit slip, description of the arrest process, and situation explanation; physical evidence such as mahjong tiles and dice (as criminal photos); and identification records, which are sufficient to establish their guilt.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It was further ascertained that on January 21, 2015, the defendant Zhang returned 17,320 RMB of illegal proceeds, which has been turned over to the state treasury. During detention in March and April 2105, the defendant Xie was twice rated as a \"civilized individual\" among detainees by the Nanchuan District Detention Center. During the trial, the defendant Zhang voluntarily replanted 240 photinia seedlings in the forest area where the incident occurred. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie and Zhang during the court hearing and are supported by the following evidence: 1. Criminal case registration form, decision to file the case, detention certificate, arrest decision; 2. Household registration information for defendants Xie and Zhang; 3. Site identification transcripts and photos, on-site inspection records and photos, identification transcripts and photos; 4. Judicial appraisal opinion from Chongqing Nanchuan Forestry Judicial Appraisal Institute; 5. Timber receipt list; 6. Copies of forest rights certificates, issuance status registration form for forest rights certificates; 7. Certificate from the Shixi Township People's Government of Nanchuan District; 8. Seized items list; 9. Case arrival report; 10. Receipt for Zhang's return of illegal proceeds; 11. Bank transaction details; 12. Criminal record information; 13. Certificate from the village committee regarding the usual behavior of the defendant Zhang and willingness to assist in education and rehabilitation; 14. Certificate and photos of replanted seedlings; 15. Appraisal form for detainee behavior at Nanchuan District Detention Center; 16. Transcripts of witness statements from Tang and Wu; 17. Confessions and defenses of defendants Xie and Zhang. All of this is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial, it was found that on March 3, 2015, the defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang conspired in advance, where Gao transported Zhang to room 1205 of the International Business Center in Nanguan District, Changchun City, to a credit card repayment agency and remained outside to assist. Subsequently, Zhang, carrying Liu's main China Merchants Bank credit card, approached the victim, Zhang A, requesting assistance in repaying 18,000 yuan. While the victim was transferring money to the credit card, Liu locked the main card using his mobile phone, preventing Zhang A from withdrawing the 18,000 yuan through the main card. After realizing the scam, the victim, with the help of bystanders, caught Zhang at the scene, while Gao and Liu withdrew and squandered the stolen money using the credit card's sub-card. Following the incident, Zhang compensated victim Zhang A with 18,000 yuan, obtaining his forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as photos of the involved credit card, the compensation agreement, the letter of forgiveness, bank transaction records, the criminal judgment, the victim Zhang A's outpatient medical records, his statements, testimonies from witnesses Cao and Yin, confessions from the defendants Liu, Gao, and Zhang, and identification records, which are sufficient to reach a verdict.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xingqing District, a certain city, charged: \n\n1. In the early morning of January 26, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole four acrylic boards from a bus stop sign near the Great Unity Square in Xingqing District, a certain city. The stolen goods were valued at 640 yuan, and the money obtained from selling the stolen goods was squandered.\n\n2. In the early morning of January 28, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole four acrylic boards from a bus stop sign near the Great Unity Square in Xingqing District, a certain city. The stolen goods were valued at 640 yuan, and the money obtained from selling the stolen goods was squandered.\n\n3. At around 3 a.m. on February 2, 2015, defendants Wu, Sun, and Zong stole two acrylic boards (valued at 320 yuan) from a bus stop sign at the east side of the Shaling Group on Lijing North Street in Xingqing District, a certain city. They sold them to a nearby recycling station and were discovered and apprehended while escaping.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that in January 2014, the defendant Zheng established a lottery gambling website (website address T65.8833555) and recruited Zhang, the defendant, as an agent for the website by offering a commission on bets, and began accepting bets from others. Since September 2014, Zhang recruited defendants Zhou and Chen, using a bet commission method, to accept bets from others. After Zhou and Chen accepted bets from multiple people, they transferred the gambling funds to Zhang. Zhang would place the bets online using his laptop or the defendant Zhou’s computer at Zhou’s residence (located at Room 0A5, Unit 1, Building 2, No. 193, Shihua West Road, Xiangzhou District, [City]), and then forwarded the bet amounts to his superior, the defendant Zheng, for fund settlement. Among them, defendant Zheng illegally profited approximately 100,000 yuan, defendant Zhang illegally profited approximately 28,000 yuan, defendant Zhou illegally profited approximately 2,000 yuan, and defendant Chen illegally profited approximately 1,460 yuan. On November 19, 2014, defendants Zhang, Zhou, and Chen were arrested by the police. The police seized one blue Samsung mobile phone, one black laptop, and one Agricultural Bank card from Zhang; one black Samsung mobile phone, five betting slips, and two notebooks from Zhou; one OPPO mobile phone, 22 betting code sheets, and the alleged gambling funds of 1,460 yuan from Chen. On December 13, 2014, defendant Zheng was arrested by the police. On February 3, 2015, defendants Zheng, Zhang, and Zhou entrusted their families to surrender all their illegal profits. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Zheng, Zhang, Zhou, and Chen during the trial, and were verified by the testimonies of witnesses Lu, Li, Yin, Guo, which were confirmed by the court, as well as identification records, seizure decisions, administrative penalty decisions, fine receipts, the arrest process, suspect information questionnaires and registration information, evidence retrieval notices, account opening materials, transaction records and fund flows, call information, search warrants and search records, seizure lists and return lists, betting slips, betting information, settlement tickets, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 18:00 on February 18, 2014, defendant Wang called defendant Liu and stated that he had drugs, specifically \"magu,\" in his possession and requested Liu's help in selling them. At about 13:00 the next day, defendant Liu drove to the Xin Yu Technology store on Changxuanling Street where defendant Wang was located, and obtained 6 tablets of the drug \"magu.\" Liu then sold them to a person named Yang for 300 RMB. Subsequently, Liu was apprehended on the spot by police officers in an alley between Ming and Qing Street and Xinjian Street on Changxuanling Street. Six red tablets, suspected to be drugs, were seized. According to the Wuhan Public Security Bureau’s Forensic Center for Drugs, the submitted materials weighed 0.57 grams in total and were identified as the drug methamphetamine. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Yang; the police reports on the seizure, the detention order, the seized items list, the on-site testing report, urine extraction records, identification records and photos, photos of the seized drugs and drug money, the registry submission form for depositing the drugs, the drug test identification report, proof of identity materials of the defendants; as well as the confessions of defendants Liu and Wang, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 8 PM on August 18, 2014, the defendants Huang and Gao conspired in advance and went to No. 88 Guofang Road in Hengdian Town of this city. Defendant Gao acted as a lookout while defendant Huang climbed through a window to commit theft. Defendant Huang first entered room 209, rented by Jiang, to steal but did not obtain any property, then proceeded to room 211, rented by Sheng, and stole 500 RMB. The two defendants each received 200 RMB from the stolen money, with the remaining 100 RMB used for joint consumption. After the incident, the public security authorities recovered 242 RMB of the stolen money, which has now been returned to the victim Sheng. The above facts were not disputed by defendant Huang during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of victims Sheng and Jiang, the testimony of witness Zheng, the on-site inspection records produced by the public security authorities, the site layout diagrams, site photographs, identification records and photos, the list of seized and returned items, photos of the seized items, video materials, the criminal judgment (2006) Jin Xing Chu Zi No. 432 from the People's Court of Jinshan District, proof of release, the decision of administrative punishment, criminal personnel information, the statement provided by the public security police officer, the capture process, and the household registration certificates of defendants Huang and Gao, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from around 11 PM on May 4, 2015, to around 2 AM the next day, the defendants Hu and Zhang, knowing that the waters of Lake Luoma were in a closed fishing season and that fishing with electric equipment was prohibited, still proceeded with Hu paddling a boat into the entrance waters of Lake Luoma in a certain province. Zhang used an electric fishing device to fish in this area. Around 2 AM on May 5, Hu and Zhang were caught at the scene by fishery administration enforcement personnel, having illegally caught approximately 14 kilograms of miscellaneous fish. It was further found that on January 30, 2015, the Ocean and Fisheries Bureau of a certain province issued a notice stating that the waters of Lake Luoma in the province would be in a closed fishing season from March 1 to June 30 each year. Additionally, on May 5, 2015, the Lake Luoma Fishery Administration Supervision Brigade of a certain province transferred the case of illegal fishing of aquatic products by Hu and Zhang to the public security authorities for investigation. On May 7 of the same year, Hu and Zhang were lawfully summoned to the case by the public security authorities, and after being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The above facts are substantiated by evidence presented and cross-examined during trial, including the incident reporting process, scene inspection records, the criminal case transfer document, physical evidence photos, the notice from the Ocean and Fisheries Bureau of a certain province, weighing records and photos, the confessions of defendants Hu and Zhang, scene identification records, explanatory notes, household registration information, and other relevant evidence, sufficient to confirm the conviction.", "label": {"Hu": ["Fine"], "Zhang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused the defendants, Wang and Xu, of engaging in a mutual brawl after a verbal altercation over trivial matters on the night of August 26, 2013, in room 219 of the \"Bubugao\" Hotel located in the Mudan District of Heze City. Both individuals sustained injuries. According to the assessment, the injuries of both Wang and Xu were classified as minor injuries. The public prosecution provided relevant evidence to support their accusation.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting from July 10, 2012, defendants Xu and Lu, together with Bai (already sentenced), Cai, Wang (both also sentenced), and others, for the purpose of profit, operated a casino in a house north of Xintai International Garden in Chaohu city along the Ring City River for over ten days, organizing gambling activities. Bai and others arranged for Zhang (already sentenced) and others to handle the daily management of the casino, organize the space, and arrange for lookouts. The casino usually held two gambling sessions each day, in the afternoon and evening, with over twenty participants each time, generating a daily turnover of 20,000 to 30,000 yuan, with an average daily profit of over 10,000 yuan from rake. During the operation of the casino, Xu and Lu were shareholders and participated in the division of profits. On June 17, 2014, Xu was apprehended by the police at the Chaohu branch of the Bank of China while conducting business. On March 27, 2015, Lu was arrested at his home by police officers. It was further found that during the period Xu and Lu were involved in operating the casino with others, the casino's rake profits exceeded 30,000 yuan. During the trial, each defendant returned 3,000 yuan of illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Xu and Lu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, case filing decision, course of arrest, criminal judgment, confessions and defenses of co-defendants Bai, Wang, among others, and payment receipts, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on December 20, 2015, at around 11 PM, on the West Chuangye Road near the South Gate of Liancheng Company in the Development Zone of Da'an Town, a district in a certain city, while Chen was driving, a collision occurred with a car driven by Feng, resulting in a subsequent dispute between the two parties. Feng called the defendants Cui, Zhong, and Guo (handled in a separate case) to the scene, where the three of them assaulted Chen. The injuries sustained by the victim, Chen, were identified as minor injuries of the second degree. On January 18, 2016, the defendants Cui and Zhong surrendered to the Da'an Police Station of a district's Public Security Bureau. The evidence presented and read out in court by the prosecutor based on the indictment includes: the case registration form, household registration information, case handling statement, agreement, letter of understanding, testimony from witness Wang, statement from the victim Chen, confessions from the defendants Cui, Zhong, and co-participant Feng, and the forensic medical assessment report on human injury degree.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From March 2016 to November 2019, the defendants Wang and Nie (handled in a separate case), being aware that the \"Dongtai Brand Sugar Heart Kang Tianma Capsules\" health products produced and sold by Wang (handled in a separate case) were not properly certified, purchased the products from Wang and sold them to Zhang1 (handled in a separate case), Li (handled in a separate case), Zhang2 (handled in a separate case), and others. Zhang1 and Li, when selling these products in certain regions, hired the defendant Gao for sales. Wang's sales amounted to 158,000 RMB, and Gao's sales amounted to 72,000 RMB. Upon examination, the \"Dongtai Brand Sugar Heart Kang Tianma Capsules\" were found to contain rosiglitazone maleate and glibenclamide. After the case was uncovered, defendant Wang was arrested, and defendant Gao voluntarily surrendered.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that: 1. On the morning of July 29, 2013, the defendants Wei and Ye conspired to a location approximately 100 meters north of a small wooden bridge in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province. They employed a scheme in which Ye pretended to search for \"gold jewelry\" he had lost, and Wei pretended to have found the \"gold jewelry\" and proposed to split it with the victim Xu, thereby defrauding Xu of a gold necklace valued at 5,717 yuan. Subsequently, one of the defendants went to the vicinity of the intersection of Yongmei Road and Zhongxing Road in the same town, using the same scheme to defraud the victim Wu of a gold necklace valued at 8,189 yuan. After the fraud, they sold the stolen goods and squandered the proceeds. 2. On the morning of August 2, 2013, the defendants Wei and Ye conspired near the Tianhe Tangxi Road Tea Ceremony Hall in a certain town of a certain city in a certain province. They used the same scheme to defraud the victim He of a gold necklace valued at 3,663.24 yuan. Afterwards, one of the defendants went near the Bali New Island Club in the same town, using the same scheme to defraud the victim Zhang Bing of a gold bracelet valued at 8,526.98 yuan and a gold necklace valued at 5,323.36 yuan. After the crime, the aforementioned two gold necklaces and one gold bracelet were recovered and returned to the victims He and Zhang Bing. The police confiscated 2,100 yuan and 3,300 yuan from Wei and Ye, respectively. During the trial, Wei's family returned 8,506 yuan of the illicit money on his behalf, which is temporarily held by the court. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Wei and Ye during the trial, and are corroborated by the evidence list retrieved, the list of seized and returned property, identification records, photos, invoices, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, statements from the victims Xu, Wu, He, and Zhang Bing, testimonies from witnesses Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi, inspection reports, price appraisal reports, and search records, which are sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on August 19, 2013, 25 boxes of medicines, including \"Bao Xin An Oil,\" (all identified as counterfeit drugs upon examination) placed by the defendant Cai at his business located at the second-floor stall F316 in Decheng Comprehensive Market, Qianzuo, Nos. 265-271 Yide Road, Yuexiu District, a certain city, were seized by the Food and Drug Administration of Yuexiu District in a certain city. On July 6, 2014, the defendants Cai and Ye collaborated at stall A6, No. 249 Yide Road, Yuexiu District, in a certain city to sell to Li certain unapproved imported medicines from a certain place, including \"Shuangfei Ren Medicine Water\" and four other types (the sales amount was 1,648 yuan). At around 12:00 p.m. on July 16, 2014, the defendant Ye was arrested at his residence at Room 1503, Building A, No. 282 Daxin Road, Yuexiu District, in a certain city. At the scene, 15 types of medicines including \"Tianma Headache Pills,\" jointly held by defendants Cai and Ye, were confiscated (all identified as counterfeit drugs upon examination). On July 23, 2014, the defendant Cai voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Cai and Ye during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including photographs of the items involved, photos of the crime scene, delivery documents, search records and seizure lists, the lease contract of the involved premises, the business license of the individual industrial and commercial household, arrest and surrender reports issued by the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Brigade of the Yuexiu District Branch of a city's Public Security Bureau, the confessions of defendants Cai and Ye, case transfer materials and identification reports issued by the Food and Drug Administration of Yuexiu District, a certain city, and the household registration materials of defendants Cai and Ye.", "label": {"Cai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Chongqing Municipality charged the defendants Du and Xu with agreeing to commit theft by prying open car windows to steal property inside the cars. Xu would use a screwdriver to pry open the windows and keep watch, while Du would enter the car to steal the property. The two defendants committed theft multiple times in this manner. The specific criminal acts are described as follows: 1. At about 3 a.m. on December 19, 2015, the two defendants stole an Asus laptop worth 1,958 yuan and 1,800 yuan in cash from a Mercedes SUV owned by the victim Yuan at an outdoor parking lot of the affiliated First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University in a certain district of the city. 2. At about 4 a.m. on the same day, the two defendants stole two packs of \"Soft Tianzi\" cigarettes from the SUV owned by the victim Luo, located 30 meters downhill from the main gate of the Daping Branch of the Traffic College on Huang Road in a certain district of the city. 3. At about 5 a.m. on the same day, the two defendants stole six bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor from the Mercedes SUV owned by the victim Wang, under the overpass on Huang Road in a certain district of the city, and later sold the stolen goods for 3,000 yuan. 4. At about 2 a.m. on December 26, 2015, the two defendants stole four bottles of Feitian Moutai liquor and several packs of \"Soft Zhonghua\" cigarettes from the Hyundai SUV owned by the victim Ming near the Junyi New Vision area in Shiqiaopu in a certain district of the city, and later sold the Moutai liquor for 2,400 yuan. 5. At about 5 a.m. on January 10, 2016, the two defendants stole a Dell laptop worth 733 yuan from the Honda SUV owned by the victim Wang near a certain temple rotary in a certain district of the city. The two defendants were apprehended by the public security authorities in a certain district of the city on January 14, 2016. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts, and the recovered stolen Dell laptop has been returned to the victim Wang.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of March 30, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Li, after drinking and upon prior arrangement, were involved in an incident where defendant Zhou drove a certain motorcycle (license f×××××) from Spacetime KTV in a city, traveling north along Xinhua Road to the intersection with Renmin Road. There, they collided with a car (license f×××××) driven by Zhuang, before defendant Li drove the motorcycle away from the scene to the Suiyuan Tea House area, where they were apprehended by police officers. According to the Jiaxing Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, both Zhou and Li had ethanol in their blood, with concentrations of 2.20mg/ml and 2.07mg/ml, respectively, both exceeding the legal standard for intoxicated driving of motor vehicles, which is 0.8mg/ml. Furthermore, it was found that neither Zhou nor Li possessed a motorcycle driving license, and the motorcycle in question had not undergone a safety inspection. During the court trial, defendant Zhou did not object to these facts, and the case is supported by evidence, including witness testimony, traffic accident scene data, driving qualification inquiry information, vehicle details, blood sample registration forms, physicochemical examination reports, arrest details, traffic accident identification documents, criminal records, and identification documents, which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Linchuan District in a certain city charges: From early March 2013 to April 11 of the same year, the defendant Xu, together with Wang, Wu (already convicted), \"Zhi\", \"Yu\" (at large), jointly operated a casino in a residential building under the Zhousha Neighborhood Committee in Shangdun Town, Linchuan District of a certain city. The defendants Xu and others provided \"Pai Gow\" and hired the defendant Hua to collect the venue fees at the casino, while \"Linlin\" (at large) kept the tally at the casino. The defendants Xu and others illegally gained profits totaling more than 80,000 RMB through rake-off gambling profits. On the afternoon of April 11, 2013, police officers from the Linchuan Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city conducted an inspection of the aforementioned location and arrested the defendants Xu and Hua on the spot. The evidence on which the public prosecution's charges are based includes: documentary evidence; testimonies of witnesses Huang and Yang; identification records; inspection records; confessions and defenses of the co-defendants Wu and Wang; confessions and defenses of the defendants Xu and Hua.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hua": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On December 18, 2014, defendants Xu and Cheng, after premeditation, used a fake property certificate held by Xu as collateral to defraud 90,000 yuan from the victim, Pan, for personal repayment and squander. After the case was brought to light, the families of the two defendants have compensated the victim for the full loss. Xu and Cheng also expressed no objection to the above facts during the trial. The case is supported by evidence, including statements from victim Pan, testimonies from witnesses Yan, Wang (first witness), Hong, Wang (second witness) and others, the loan agreement, state-owned land use certificate, proof documents, bank account details, receipt, arrest process, and household registration certificates, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu, since August 2015, were employed by others (handled in a separate case) to engage in illegal activities. They operated from rented rooms in certain districts of a certain city in a certain province, specifically in Room 352 and Room 355 of certain buildings in the northern village of a certain neighborhood, where they posted false online part-time job information about building credit. They left contact QQ numbers for communication, and when individuals contacted them, they would deceive them into purchasing mobile phone recharge cards through designated web links. Subsequently, they would obtain the card numbers and passwords and resell them to websites such as card malls. By December 22, 2015, when they were apprehended, they had defrauded a total of 77,310 yuan. All three defendants were arrested on October 22, 2015, and on the same day, the defendant Hu assisted the police in capturing co-conspirators. The items seized from the defendants included three laptops, eleven bank cards, seven mobile phones, five internet cards, seven drives, five SIM cards, one rental contract, three bank receipts, one bank security token, and two identification cards of other people. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu during the trial process. These were corroborated by the evidence presented, including search records, a list of seized items, site photographs, statements, and submitted materials from victims Kuang, Li, and Wang, bank account transaction details, screenshots of withdrawal surveillance footage, expert reports, computer QQ chat logs, screenshots of stored computer data, recognition records, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhao, Luo, and Hu, electronic evidence inspection records, apprehension reports, household registration certificates, case registration forms, and job descriptions, which were sufficient to confirm the facts of the case.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kenli District in a certain city charged: At approximately 18:00 on February 13, 2016, the defendant Bo was driving a Dongfeng Nissan sedan with license plate G×××××, traveling north on Lihe Road in Kenli District of a certain city. When he reached the location of lamp post number 150, he was involved in a traffic accident with the pedestrian victim, Ji. The defendant Long, driving a Beijing Hyundai sedan with license plate LuE×××××, also traveling north on Lihe Road in Kenli District, reached the same location of lamp post number 150 and was involved in another collision with Ji, resulting in Ji's death. After the accident, Long fled the scene. According to a forensic examination, Ji's death was caused by cranial and cervical spinal cord injuries combined with injuries to the thoracic and abdominal organs. The Traffic Police Brigade of Kenli County Public Security Bureau concluded that Bo and Long were fully responsible for the accident. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Bo and Long during the court hearing. Additionally, the facts are supported by documentary evidence such as the case registration form from the Traffic Management Brigade of Kenli County Public Security Bureau, a description of the case investigation, road traffic accident determination report, identity information of defendants Bo and Long, driver information, vehicle information, victim Ji's identity information, delivery receipts, notice of examination and assessment conclusions, mediation agreement, letter of understanding, testimonies of witnesses Ding, Sun, Yu, and Wei, physico-chemical test identification report, forensic identification opinion, forensic autopsy report, road traffic accident site diagram, road traffic accident site inspection record, photos, and the statements and defenses of defendants Bo and Long, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Bo": ["Imprisonment"], "Long": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In mid-January 2015, the defendant Si contacted the defendant Bai by phone, asking him to help find a pawnshop where a car could be mortgaged. Around 9 a.m. on January 26, 2015, the defendant Si drove away a black Zhonghua Junjie car belonging to a person named Ma, and later went to a certain place to meet the defendant Bai. The two discussed that the defendant Bai would pretend to be the stepson of the car owner Ma, and the defendant Si would impersonate Ma. Defendant Bai then pawned the car to a person named Wu, obtaining 6,500 yuan, with both parties agreeing on a mortgage period of two months. Subsequently, the stolen money obtained from pawning the car was squandered by the two defendants. Upon maturity, the defendants Si and Bai were unable to repay the mortgage amount.", "label": {"Si": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that between November 2016 and December 2016, defendants Zhang and Ding drove together to various locations in a certain town and the Guanyun Salt Field in Guanyun County, where they used crossbows and poison darts to steal a total of 17 dogs on multiple occasions.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in late December 2013, a co-defendant, Du Moujia (also known as Du Mou, handled separately), rented an apartment at No. 4, 302 Dongyi Lane, Donghua Square, Donglian Village, Dashi Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou. Du set up gambling fish machines in this apartment to attract others to gamble. Since early January 2014, defendants Zhang and Zhou were hired by Du Moujia to manage the casino and were responsible for cashier duties, scoring, and more. At approximately 1 a.m. on January 15, 2014, police arrived at the location following a report and arrested defendants Zhang and Zhou, along with eight people caught gambling, including Wu Mouyi and Zhong Mou Bing (all of whom received administrative punishment). The police seized a gambling fish machine, casino profits totaling 5,000 yuan, and various gambling funds from participants at the scene. Defendants Zhang and Zhou raised no objections to these facts during the trial, which were substantiated by their confessions, testimonies from witnesses Luo Moumou, Wu Moumou, Zhong Moumou, Mu Moukui, He Mou, Zhang Mou, Bi Moumou, Jiang Mou, Mu Moufei, as well as identification records, inspection records, onsite investigation records and diagrams, onsite photos, lists of evidence preservation, and arrest procedures, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the claims.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on the afternoon of October 29, 2015, the defendants Zhao and He went to the old farmers' market parking lot in Jiangnan Street of a certain city. With He keeping watch, Zhao took advantage of the owner's absence to open the door of the engineering vehicle with license plate G××××× and entered. He stole a set of fiber optic fusion splicer from the back seat, which belonged to the vehicle owner, Zhang. The two then drove away from the scene. According to the appraisal by the city's Price Authentication Center, the stolen Fujikura FSM-60S fiber optic fusion splicer (including a cleaver) was valued at 16,560 yuan. The same day, authorities arrested the defendants Zhao and He at the Gaofan intersection in Jiangnan Development Zone, of the certain city and discovered the stolen fusion splicer in the trunk of the gray Mazda 3 they were driving, with the license plate G×××××. The fusion splicer was confiscated and later returned to the victim. After their apprehension, Zhao and He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, Zhao and He also raised no objections to the above facts, which were corroborated by the victim Zhang's statement, the confessions and defenses of Zhao and He, case registration forms, personal information, arrest records, notice of appraisal opinion, evidence receipt list and invoice copies, the price assessment report, on-site investigation records and photos, seizure records, seizure decisions, seizure lists, restitution lists, recognition records and photos, notice for gathering evidence, evidence collection lists, video discs, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that from May to November 2015, the defendant He repeatedly allowed drug users Deng and Zhou to use methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") in Room 504, Building 36, within the residential area of the First Cotton Textile Factory on Gongye Middle Road, Wujiang District, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. On one day in mid-May 2015 and on November 23, 2015, the defendants He and Tang jointly allowed drug users Deng and Zhou to use methamphetamine at the aforementioned location. On December 11, 2015, the police apprehended defendants He and Tang at Building 36, within the residential area of the First Cotton Textile Factory on Gongye Middle Road, Wujiang District, a certain city, and discovered a homemade drug-use tool at the scene. Urine samples from defendants He, Tang, and drug users Deng and Zhou tested positive for methamphetamine via reagent testing. Defendants He and Tang, along with He's defense attorney, raised no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. He's defense attorney argued that defendant He was a first-time offender with weak legal awareness and minor subjective malice. He truthfully confessed the criminal facts after being captured and demonstrated a good attitude of admitting guilt. Furthermore, He and Tang have a child with thalassemia who is without care, requesting leniency and probation for the defendant He. The facts charged by the prosecution are substantiated by evidence such as documentary evidence, household registration proof, capture process records, seizure decision, seizure list, on-site testing report, testimonies from witnesses Luo, Deng, and Zhou, confessions from defendants Tang and He, identification records, and on-site investigation work records and photos, which are sufficient for establishing the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In September 2014, defendants Luo and Cui provided a location to accommodate Liu, Hu, He, and others for drug use. To prove the aforementioned facts, the People's Procuratorate of a certain place presented relevant evidence in court. The procuratorate believes that defendants Luo and Cui should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. The court is petitioned to sentence the defendants according to law. Defendants Luo and Cui raised no objection to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. After trial, it was found: On the afternoon of September 16, 2014, defendants Luo and Cui, along with Liu, Hu, and He, consumed drugs provided by Liu in a room (number xxxx, unit x, building x, Huizhou Residence, Tunxi District, a certain city) rented jointly by Luo and Cui. At around 19:00 that evening, defendants Luo and Cui left the rented residence to work at Myth Entertainment Club in Tunxi District, a certain city, while Liu, Hu, and He continued using methamphetamine in the room. In the early morning of September 17, 2014, after finishing work at Myth Entertainment Club, defendants Luo and Cui, along with Ye, returned to the rented residence (number xxxx, unit x, building x, Huizhou Residence, Tunxi District) and consumed drugs together with Liu, Hu, He, Bai, and Ye. After the incident, defendants Luo and Cui, upon being summoned, truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined during the trial, which the court acknowledges: 1. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificates of defendants Luo and Cui, proof of past offenses, and housing lease contracts; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Liu, Hu, He, etc.; 3. Statements and defenses of defendants Luo and Cui; 4. The search records and scene photos made by Shexian County Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 2 a.m. on October 5, 2019, defendants Liu and Han believed that the funds they provided for online gambling had been taken by Li. They then invited defendants Wang and Qiao to drive together from a certain city to Xing County Xingyu Internet Cafe, where they found the victim Li and defendant Yuan. Liu, Han, and Qiao forcibly took Li into their car, while Wang and Yuan also followed into the vehicle. Subsequently, Liu and the others took Li's phone and took him to various places, including Xianyuan Cemetery in Yun District, under a viaduct in Dianjun District, the Shuowen Business Hotel and Golden Island Hotel in Wujia District, and Jinshi Park on Ziyang Road in Dianjun District, to force Li to repay the money. During this time, Liu and Han instructed Qiao, Yuan, and Wang to guard Li to prevent his escape, to listen to his phone calls, and to monitor his attempts to borrow money through messages. Liu, Han, Qiao, Yuan, and Wang physically assaulted Li, and after Wang (who is being dealt with in a separate case) arrived, he also assaulted and intimidated Li. Liu and Han threatened Li; Liu burned Li's face with a cigarette, and Han forced Li to undress, squat, and pose for photographs, causing Li to frequently kneel and plead for mercy. At around 10 p.m. on October 6, 2019, Liu instructed Qiao to take Li to a village in Dianjun District to get money from Li’s mother, at which point Li was finally freed from the control of Liu and his accomplice", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: At about midnight on October 2, 2012, the defendant Wu, after consuming alcohol, drove an unlicensed and unregistered two-wheeled motorcycle without a valid driver's license along XX Road from south to north. Meanwhile, the defendant Su, also after consuming alcohol, drove a two-wheeled motorcycle with the registration number Min XX** from north to south on XX Road. When reaching the intersection of XX Road and XX Street, the two vehicles collided, resulting in damage to both vehicles and injuries to defendant Wu. According to an appraisal by the Fujian Lisi Forensic Identification Institute, defendant Wu's blood serum alcohol concentration at the time of the incident was 169.4 mg/dl, while defendant Su's was 148.4 mg/dl. After the incident, defendants Wu and Su waited at the scene for the public security authorities to handle the situation. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Wu and Su during the trial, and the evidence provided includes copies of the identification cards of defendants Wu and Su, copies of motor vehicle driver's licenses and registration certificates, copies of motor vehicle sales documents, a list of seized items, receipts for returned items, a deposit slip from Xingye Bank, a biochemical test report from Xiangcheng Hospital in Zhangzhou City, an application, and the judicial appraisal report from the Fujian Lisi Forensic Identification Institute. Additional evidence includes the road traffic accident identification report, a letter of understanding, a motor vehicle theft and robbery inquiry record, a certificate of motor vehicle driving qualification inquiry, the public security authority's case report, a criminal record certificate, a site plan, and photos of the scene. All of these are sufficient to establish the charges. During the trial process, defendants Wu and Su each prepaid a fine of 6,000 RMB to the court.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Su": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that on February 8, 2012, at around 19:00, the defendant Lv, believing that his girlfriend Zhang was harassed by the victim Sun, gathered the defendants Ye, Li, and Xu (handled separately) to the west side of the fire escape at the GF floor of Watsons in Xicheng Plaza. There, they punched and kicked the victim Sun, resulting in a pneumothorax on the left side and partial lung compression. According to the assessment, the victim Sun's injuries were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendant Li truthfully confessed his crimes to the police at the station after being summoned by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Lv, Ye, and Li during the court proceedings and are verified by the victim Sun's statement, the testimony of witness Zhang, the confession of co-defendant Xu, the police call log, hospitalization records, preliminary examination opinion, notification of assessment conclusion, letter of understanding, compensation agreement, receipts, arrest record, proof of residence, and the forensic medical assessment of bodily injury, as well as the identification record, which are sufficient for validation.", "label": {"Lv": ["Imprisonment"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charged: Between October 2 and October 18, 2015, the defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye set up a gambling den on Renmin Street No. 294 and surrounding alleys in Bihu Town, District of a certain City, organized illegal gambling activities, and profited over 7,000 yuan from rake-offs. The actions of the defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye have violated the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of X. In this joint crime, defendant Yu was the principal offender, while defendants Cheng and Ye were accomplices. It is requested that they be sentenced according to law. Furthermore, it was found that after the crime, defendant Yu returned all the illegal proceeds. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye during the court hearing, and were supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified in court: 1. Household registration proof; 2. Confessions and defenses of defendants Yu, Cheng, and Ye; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Gan, Chen Jia, Chen Yi, Hu, Tang, Yu, Lin, and Jin; 4. Inspection records and photographs; 5. Evidence preservation list; 6. Seizure decision and inventory; 7. Capture process details; 8. Administrative penalty decision; 9. Receipts, etc., proving the charges, with evidence that is indeed sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county charges: On the evening of October 21, 2013, defendants Jiang, He, and Zou respectively rode a motorcycle and a motorized tricycle to a town in the county. Zou killed a dog using high voltage electricity and placed it on the motorcycle ridden by He. They then transported the dead dog using Jiang's motorized tricycle. That same night, Jiang, He, and Zou stole nine dogs from villagers at various locations in certain villages and sites within the town. Upon discovery by the villagers, He and Zou fled the scene on motorcycles, while Jiang was captured by the villagers and taken to the county's Public Security Bureau. After being apprehended, Jiang truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. It was assessed that the value of the nine stolen dogs was 1,610 RMB. Furthermore, it was discovered that a Loncin brand motorized tricycle was seized at the scene when Jiang was captured. On January 20, 2014, defendants He and Zou surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of the county, honestly confessing the aforementioned criminal facts. The defendants Jiang, He, and Zou raised no objections during the trial hearing of these facts, which were corroborated by the statements of victims Yu, Fan, Xu, Yu, Wang A, Wang B, Zhou, Li B; witness Li A's testimony; on-site inspection records; criminal photographs; identification records; arrest processes; valuation assessment documents; household registration information, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in August 2014, defendants Chen and Hong conspired together, with defendant Chen acting as the banker and defendant Hong accepting others' bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery. Defendant Hong then reported the betting details to defendant Chen. From August 2014 to February 18, 2016, defendant Hong illegally sold \"Mark Six\" lottery tickets and accepted bets from others at a supermarket he operated in a village in a certain town of the city. The total number of betting periods was approximately 110, and the total amount of bets accepted exceeded 220,000 yuan. During the illegal sale of the \"Mark Six\" lottery, defendant Hong reported the betting details to defendant Chen as agreed. Defendant Chen provided 12% of the bet amount as Hong's profit. Defendant Hong returned 5% of the bet amount to the bettors and made a profit of 7% for himself, totaling 15,400 yuan. On February 18, 2016, the police uncovered the \"Mark Six\" operation and arrested defendant Hong. After the incident, defendant Hong returned the illegal gains of 15,400 yuan. On March 17, 2016, defendant Chen turned himself in to the police and truthfully confessed his crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Hong during the court proceedings. The evidence, including the testimony of witness Lin, site inspection records, photos, detention orders, a list of seized items, temporarily detained tickets and money, \"Mark Six\" promotional materials, \"Mark Six\" accounting records, the capture process, and household registration certificates, is sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: 1. During the period from September 2013 to July 2014, the defendant Mu repeatedly, more than ten times, accommodated Sun, Hu, Zhao, Ren, Wei, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) at locations such as the \"Wanshun Fishing Gear\" shop he operated, his Audi A6 car, and his home. 2. During the period from April 2014 to June 2014, the defendant Sun repeatedly accommodated Hu, Mu, Wang, Zhao, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) at a vegetable collection point located in a certain village of a certain town and in his Sonata car. 3. During the period from April 2014 to June 2014, the defendant Hu accommodated Sun, Mu, Wang, Zhao, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) on four occasions at his home and in Room 408 of the Kyodo Hotel in Shouguang City. After the incident, the defendant Mu assisted the public security organs in capturing defendants Sun and Hu. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Ren, Wei, and Wang, onsite inspection reports, case registration forms, the arrest process, population information, case handling explanations, and administrative penalty decision notices, providing sufficient grounds for confirmation.", "label": {"Mu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 1:00 a.m. on September 29, 2020, the defendants, Shi and Zhu, colluded and took advantage of the absence of personnel to steal five coal powder spray nozzles and eight flame-stabilizing teeth from Workshop No. 5 of Jiangsu Jingcheng Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in Xinqiao Town of this city, with a total value of 6,720 RMB. At around 4:00 a.m. on October 1, 2020, the defendant Shi once again took advantage of the absence of personnel to steal two coal powder spray nozzles from the same location, valued at 1,008 RMB. After the defendants Shi and Zhu were apprehended, they confessed to their crimes truthfully. Following the incident, the public security bureau lawfully seized 505 RMB and two coal powder spray nozzles from Shi, and eight flame-stabilizing teeth stolen by Zhu. Except for the 505 RMB temporarily kept at the public security bureau, the remaining items were returned to the victimized unit. During the trial in this court, the defendant Shi returned unlawful gains amounting to 2,520 RMB. This court commissioned the Jingjiang City Judicial Bureau to investigate the social behavior and community supervision conditions of the defendants Shi and Zhu. After the investigation, the bureau concluded that Shi and Zhu pose little social danger in applying community corrections and have minimal impact on the villages where they reside. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged without objection by the defendants Shi and Zhu during the trial, where they signed and confirmed the statements. The case is supported by verified evidence such as police incident registration forms, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decision documents, arrest records, testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Tan, and Shen, a valuation report issued by the Jingjiang City Price Appraisal Center, identification records and photos, search records and photos, seizure records, seizure decision documents, lists of seized and returned items, weighing records and photos, the investigation and evaluation report issued by the Jingjiang City Judicial Bureau, and the basic identity information of the defendants Shi and Zhu, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Shi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it was found: From May to June 2018, defendants Ding and Xue committed two thefts in Fangdu Office, a certain county, and in a particular township, stealing a total of 4,200 Yuan in cash from victims Ji and Wang. The specific facts are as follows: 1. On May 28, 2018, at approximately 10:30 AM, defendants Ding and Xue went to Ji's home in a village under Fangdu Office, a certain county, under the pretense of taking photos for subsidies. Taking advantage of an opportunity, they stole 3,400 Yuan from a bag inside Ji's home. 2. On June 1, 2018, at approximately 10:34 AM, Ding and Xue went to Wang's home in a village under a certain camp in the county, under the guise of investigating subsidy distribution to the elderly, and stole 800 Yuan from a bag inside Wang's home while he was unprepared. 3. On June 16, 2018, at around 7 AM, defendants Ding and Xue went to Ma's home in a village under Nanlu Office in the county intending to commit theft, but were thwarted by Ma, who was passing by. Defendant Xue was captured on the spot. On July 14, 2018, defendant Ding was captured by police from the county public security bureau. After the defendants Ding and Xue were brought to justice, they both truthfully confessed to all criminal facts. After the case, defendants Ding and Xue compensated the victims for all economic losses, and their actions have gained the victims' understanding. Defendant Xue was administratively detained for eight days (from June 16, 2018 to June 24, 2018) and fined 200 Yuan due to the third theft case, which has now been revoked. During the trial, defendants Ding and Xue had no objection to the above facts, which were confirmed by testimony from victims Ji and Wang, witness Ma's testimony, lists of seized and returned items produced by the county public security bureau, revocation of administrative penalty decisions, letters of understanding, the case solving process, arrest process, previous records, and household registration information, providing sufficient evidence for recognition.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting in late October 2013, the defendant Ye, without approval from the environmental protection department, established an electroplating processing site in his own home in a certain village of a certain city. On February 12, 2014, defendant Li was hired by Ye to work at the processing site, carrying out electroplating tasks. Defendant Li directly discharged the wastewater generated from the electroplating process onto the ground of the processing site, which eventually flowed into the outside river channels. The site was raided on March 31, 2014. Tests conducted by a city's environmental monitoring center showed that the illegal electroplating site's discharged wastewater contained zinc with a concentration of 424mg/L and hexavalent chromium with a concentration of 1000mg/L, both exceeding the electroplating pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department agreed to approve this monitoring report. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Ye and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhi, and Wang, the arrest process records, monitoring reports and approval opinions, identification records, on-site investigation records, verification proof of criminal history, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: From June 2012 to February 2013, the defendant Liu illegally accessed the back-end of the cash register system of Jindu Internet Cafe on Baotou Road, Daqi Street, a district in a certain city. Liu changed the owner's permissions to employee permissions and created an account \"a\" with the password \"123456.\" Liu used this account multiple times to top up for himself and people who came to surf the internet, thereby stealing funds from the internet cafe. In October 2012, Liu told the cashier of Jindu Internet Cafe, Zong, and the network administrator, Ran, the account and password. Defendant Zong created an account \"jdwbb\" and informed Ran about the account and password. Defendant Liu used the account \"a,\" defendant Zong used the accounts \"a,\" \"jdwbb,\" and \"SY,\" and defendant Ran used the accounts \"a\" and \"jdwbb\" to recharge others illegally and steal cash from the internet cafe. After the incident, Zong’s family compensated the victim with 20,000 yuan, and the victim forgave Zong. During the trial process, defendants Liu, Zong, and Ran admitted that they respectively stole 8,000 yuan, 10,000 yuan, and 6,000 yuan in cash during the process of modifying member accounts. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Zong, and Ran during the court proceedings. Additionally, these are confirmed by the victim Zhang's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang and Xiang, among others, identification records and photos, a summary and data modification log of member information changes and the total amount modified through the internet cafe’s back-end management system from 2012 to 2013, and evidence provided by the police, such as the arrest process record, explanatory notes, public security administrative penalty decision, letter of understanding, social investigation report, household registration certificate, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ran": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found: Defendant Hu (formerly the manager of the Franchise Department of XX City XXX Food Store) colluded with defendant Zhou (formerly the regional manager of the XXX Franchise Department), Wang (formerly the assistant manager of the XXX Franchise Department), Wang Moumou, and others during the negotiations in August 2014 for franchisee Shi to join. They utilized their positions responsible for negotiation and transfer without the company's knowledge to privately decide to transfer the franchising rights of Tonglu XXX franchise store to Shi, instructing Shi to pay a franchise transfer fee of 300,000 yuan. Of this, 130,000 yuan was paid as a transfer fee to He of the Tonglu franchise, and the remaining 170,000 yuan was embezzled by defendants Hu, Wang, Zhou, and others. Defendant Hu received 84,000 yuan, defendant Wang received 56,000 yuan, and defendant Zhou received 10,000 yuan. Xie (handled in a separate case) knowingly accepted 5,000 yuan given by defendant Hu, which was illegally obtained, and used it for personal purposes. On February 2, 2016, defendants Hu, Zhou, and Wang compensated the full loss and received Shi's understanding. On February 25, 2016, defendants Wang and Zhou surrendered themselves to the Yiwu City Public Security Bureau. These facts were undisputed by defendants Hu, Wang, and Zhou during the trial and were supported by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Jin, He, Liu, Shi, and Xie; receipts; franchise agreements; transfer vouchers; payrolls; business licenses; criminal judgment documents; transfer agreements; situation explanations; payment receipts; letters of understanding; arrest procedures; the confessions of defendants Hu, Zhou, Wang; and identification proofs. This evidence is sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The County People's Procuratorate charges: In June 2012, defendants Zhan and Cao jointly agreed to purchase the trees on \"He Jupao\" mountain land and \"Qiluwa\" mountain land from He for RMB 2,000. In March 2013, defendants Zhan and Cao again jointly agreed to purchase the trees on \"Jinjiawubian\" mountain land from Li for RMB 1,000. When felling trees on these three pieces of mountain land, Zhan and Cao did not obtain a \"Timber Harvesting Permit.\" The logged trees were all Masson pine. According to the appraisal by the county forestry engineer, the standing timber volume of the Masson pine felled on the three pieces of mountain land totaled 16.17 cubic meters. The county price certification center appraised the value of the illegally felled trees at a total of RMB 7,276. After the incident, defendants Zhan and Cao returned the illegal proceeds of RMB 7,276 to the county forest public security bureau. In support of the charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including witness testimonies, confessions of the defendants, expert opinions, and on-site inspection records.", "label": {"Zhan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On November 2, 2015, defendant Wu, after prior arrangement, agreed to sell 0.62 grams of methamphetamine (ice) for 500 RMB to Ge. That evening, defendants Wu and Xiao colluded and went to the intersection of Renmin South Road and Yuxiu Road in our district, where they sold 0.62 grams of methamphetamine to Ge for 500 RMB. Later, they were apprehended on the spot by waiting police officers, who subsequently discovered an additional 0.74 grams of methamphetamine from defendant Xiao.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Yang had a colleague relationship with the victim Xiang. After Xiang was dismissed from the company, he believed it was Yang's responsibility and demanded compensation from Yang. Yang informed her husband, He, about this matter. After learning about it, the defendant He asked his cousin, Mi (handled in a separate case), to help resolve the matter. Later, Yang and Xiang agreed to meet opposite a certain credit union near a square on Fuyong Street, Baoan District, to discuss the issue.\n\nOn the afternoon of February 8, 2004, Yang, He, and Mi went to a certain hair salon in a village to find Feng (nicknamed \"Lanmoumou,\" already sentenced) for help in settling the matter. Feng then instructed Su (alias Li B, nicknamed \"Laomoumou,\" already sentenced), \"Li A\" (handled in a separate case), and \"Amoumou\" (handled in a separate case) to gather others. Su and \"Amoumou\" gathered Hu 1 (already sentenced) and Hu 2 (already sentenced), while \"Li A\" gathered ", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: At around 16:00 on December 26, 2013, the defendants Chen and Hu, along with \"A Mo Mo\" (handled in a separate case), carried tools and rode a motorcycle to the front of \"HSBC Textile\" at No. 168, Building E1, Cowboy City, Xintang Town, a certain city. They intended to steal a Yamaha Fuxi ladies' motorcycle (valued at 4,380 RMB according to the appraisal) belonging to the victim, Wu Yi, which was parked at that location. They were discovered by Liu Bing and others, colleagues of Wu Yi, who attempted to stop them. The defendant Hu and others resisted capture by wielding a knife in a threatening manner and forcibly drove away with the motorcycle. The prosecution presented the defendants' confessions, the victim's statements, and other related evidence in court to prove the charges. Accordingly,", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from December 22, 2018, to January 5, 2019, the defendants Liu, Xue, and Du colluded together at Liu's home in a certain district of a certain place, using a program-controlled mahjong machine to organize others for gambling. Among them, Liu directly participated in the gambling, Xue was responsible for controlling the mahjong machine to cheat, and Du was responsible for keeping watch. Through this method, the three organized gambling for profit on four occasions, making a total profit of 33,800 yuan. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence including household registration certificates, the process of bringing the suspects to justice, the decision to approve arrest, testimonies of witnesses including Wang, Gao, Luo, Yan, Xiao, and others, seizure decision and list, identification records, identification photos, and identification explanations, as well as confessions from the defendants Liu, Xue, and Du.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on October 27, 2014, at about 14:00, the defendant Xu had an altercation with Ju over a computer while using the internet at the \"Junlin\" Internet cafe in a town of a certain county. Xu then called the defendant Ruan to come to the internet cafe. After Ruan arrived at the Junlin Internet cafe, Xu informed Ruan about the matter of the computer dispute and took Ruan to confront Ju. Ju's friend, Han, came over to help, and a conflict broke out between the parties, leading to a scuffle. Ruan punched and kicked Han, knocking Han to the ground. Xu punched and kicked Ju, and subsequently, Ruan attacked Ju. Xu also kicked Han, who was lying on the ground, a few times. According to the forensic medical examination by the Public Security Bureau of a certain county, Han's right foot fracture was identified as a minor injury of the second degree, and Ju's injuries were classified as minor injuries. On October 28, 2014, Xu and Ruan volunta", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ruan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 23:00 on December 11, 2014, Ren Moujia was beaten and stabbed by the bar staff in the Lechao Bar in Xiaoyi City. After notifying his brother Ren Mou by phone, Ren Mou called Li (already prosecuted) to go and take a look. The defendant Li then contacted the defendants Lu, Tang, Chen, and others to go to Lechao Bar. Seeing the bar's main door tightly closed, Li instructed the defendants Lu, Tang, Chen, Xiao Moumou, and Da Moumou (the identities of Xiao Moumou and Da Moumou are unknown) to break the glass door of the bar. According to the Xiaoyi City Price Appraisal Center, the loss value of the bar's glass door was 7,500 yuan. The above facts are supported by the report materials and the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, price appraisal opinions, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants. The actions of the defendants Lu, Tang, and Chen have violated the criminal law and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. The three defendants constitute voluntary surrender. Please convict according to the law. The defendants Lu, Tang, and Chen have no objection to the facts of the charges and voluntarily plead guilty in court.\n\nAfter trial, it was found that: At around 23:00 on December 11, 2014, Ren Moujia was beaten and stabbed by the bar staff in Lechao Bar, Xiaoyi City. After notifying his brother Ren Mou by phone, Ren Mou called Li (already convicted) to go and take a l", "label": {"Lu": ["Detention"], "Tang": ["Detention"], "Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Hebei Province charged that on the afternoon of May 24, 2014, defendant Guo, in collusion with defendant Sun and others, intercepted a green pickup truck driven by Mu at the intersection of China State Construction Seventh Bureau in a certain city. They assaulted Mu and Wu with a pickaxe handle and damaged the green pickup truck. Forensic assessment determined that victims Mu and Wu sustained minor injuries, and the damage to the vehicle amounted to 3,882 yuan. Additionally, it was found that on June 13, 2014, defendant Guo voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. On June 15 of the same year, defendant Sun also voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. After the incident, the civil aspect of the case has now been resolved through mediation, and the victims Mu and Wu have forgiven the defendants. The facts mentioned above were not contested by defendants Guo and Sun during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Mu and Wu, the testimonies of witnesses Bian, Yan, Gao, Pang, and Ma, the identification records involved in the case, the scene diagrams of the damaged items, photos of the damaged vehicle, documents listing seized items, a CD, appraisal report numbers 494 and 495 (2014) from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, price appraisal conclusion document number 102 (2014) from the Price Appraisal Center for Involved Items in a certain city, the mediation agreement and receipt, the account of the case provided by the Development Zone Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and the identity information of defendants Guo and Sun, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention"], "Sun": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on May 6, 2015, at around 17:00, defendants Qi and Yu, in order to collect debts for the Zhongshan branch of Shenzhen XX Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd., gathered individuals including Qi A, \"A certain\" and others (who are being handled separately) to take the victim, Wen Han, from his home located at XXXXX No. 1, a certain town in a certain city, to rooms 201 and 1002 on the second floor of the KTV at XXXX Hotel in the West District of a certain city, among other places, to detain him. During this period, defendants Qi and Yu physically assaulted the victim, Wen Yi, causing injuries. On May 7, around 19:00, defendants Qi and Yu released Wen Yi after demanding that he raise funds. On July 1 and July 21 of the same year, police officers successively captured defendants Qi and Yu in XXXX in the West District, and in a chess and card room in the West District. According to an appraisal, the wounds on the victim Wen Yi were consistent with blunt force trauma, and the injuries were minor. The facts above were not disputed by defendants Qi and Yu during the trial and were substantiated by evidence including the statement of the victim Wen Yi, the arrest reports from the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the San Jiao Sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, seizure records and lists, on-site diagrams and photos, the \"Forensic Injury Examination Certificate\" and injury photos provided by the San Jiao Sub-bureau of a certain city's Public Securit", "label": {"Qi": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Helan County, in a certain Hui district, accused the defendants Zhou and Ma. Zhou, who was the owner of a certain village shop, sought to reduce his electricity costs in February 2017 and asked the defendant Ma if it could be done. Ma stated it was possible. Subsequently, Zhou removed the functioning electric meter (meter number 0004593896) installed by the Helan County Power Supply Bureau from his shop, gave it to Ma, and paid Ma 2,800 yuan. Ma then found someone to alter the meter and returned it to Zhou, who installed the modified meter back in his shop. Later, staff from the local power company, Helan Power Supply Company, discovered the meter had been tampered with during an inspection. Upon reviewing the restaurant's electricity bill records from February 2017 to January 2019, it was found that the payments were significantly lower than normal. The case was reported to the police, and an investigation confirmed that 14,000 yuan worth of electricity had been stolen. After the incident, Zhou compensated the victimized power company with 25,024.5 yuan for the stolen electricity, obtaining their understanding. In support of the aforementioned criminal charge, the prosecution submitted evidence to the court, including household registration records, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses from defendants Zhou and Ma, on-site inspection records, identification records and photographs, and appraisal opinions.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At the end of 2011, the defendant Li purchased a silver-gray van with no documentation (engine number 903420249, chassis number LZWACAG998122318) from Zhou (currently at large) near the driving school on the Second Ring Road in Huangmei Town for 6,000 yuan. Around May 2013, Li felt that it was unsafe to drive this van due to the lack of documentation and sold it to the defendant Nie. Nie noticed that the vehicle was clearly below market price and bought the van for 6,000 yuan. On April 16, 2014, at around 14:00, Nie was driving this van when he was stopped by police officers from the Jiujiang Public Security Bureau at the Jiujiang Yangtze River Second Bridge. Upon investigation, it was found that the vehicle was a stolen vehicle belonging to the victim Wu. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of Xunyang District, Jiujiang City, the stolen vehicle was valued at 24,017 yuan.", "label": {"Nie": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Between March and April 2014, the defendant Jia, in collaboration with Chen (who has been convicted), set up gambling dens in certain villages in a city in Anhui Province, such as a village in the Dongfeng community, and profited by taking a rake-off. During this period, the defendant Zhang invested in the operation for seven days, and the defendant Han was responsible for contacting gamblers and gambling venues, with Chen paying Han 200 yuan daily. The gambling involved the \"28 cards\" method and lasted more than 20 days, with daily profits exceeding 10,000 yuan. The defendant Jia and Chen evenly split the rake-off profits; during the seven days the defendant Zhang was involved, the profits were split between Chen, Jia, and Zhang. The defendant Jia illegally gained more than 200,000 yuan through rake-offs; the defendant Zhang illegally gained over 70,000 yuan; and the defendant Han illicitly gained over 4,000 yuan. On December 10, 2014, the defendant Jia voluntarily surrendered to the city's public security bureau; on December 5, 2014, the defendant Zhang was apprehended by the public security bureau at the Chengbei police station while conducting business; and on April 5, 2015, the defendant Han was captured by the public security bureau at the city's train station. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above allegations.", "label": {"Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged: On the evening of March 8, 2017, at around 11 PM, since the defendants Zou and Hu had no regular income, they decided to steal something and sell it for money. That evening, the two drove Zou's white van to the underground parking lot of the Olympian Holiday Residential Area in the old sports stadium on Gandong Avenue, Fuzhou City. To avoid drawing attention, Hu wore a security uniform to commit the theft while Zou kept watch. Hu then stole a box containing more than 40 mobile phones from the back of the victim Zhang's silver Jetta sedan and fled to a rural area to Hu's home. They found that there were too many phones, picked out a few better ones, and returned the rest to Zhang's car. The Linchuan District Price Accreditation Center later appraised that the stolen phones were worth 6,365 RMB. The evidence used by the public prosecution to bring the charges includes documentary evidence; the victim's statement, Zhang's statement; the defendants' confessions and defenses, Zou and Hu's confessions and defenses; appraisal opinion; and audio-visual materials.", "label": {"Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 7 PM on April 18, 2014, defendant Han, after consuming alcohol, walked to near No. 8 Xiuhua Lane, Qinhuai District of this city. There, he encountered Wang driving a vehicle, giving way to an oncoming vehicle. Han inexplicably began to slap and kick the right rear door of Wang's vehicle and assaulted Wang and his son Wang (who was under 14 years old) when they got out to check the situation. During this time, defendant Zhang happened to pass by and assisted defendant Han in jointly assaulting Wang, resulting in Wang sustaining a neck injury from a foreign object, contusions to both eyes, concussive injuries to both retinas, subconjunctival hemorrhage in both eyes, and multiple soft tissue contusions across his body. According to the forensic identification by the Nanjing Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identification Institute, the degree of injury Wang sustained was classified as minor injury level two.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that one night in March 2014, defendants Wang and Xu, after planning, went to an alley near Fortune Street Community, a town street in this city, and stole a Lifan brand 110 model motorcycle parked there by the victim Zhao. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 2,400 yuan. The prosecution provided evidence such as the defendants' confessions and defenses, the victim’s statements, witness testimonies, a price appraisal report, and documentary evidence, believing that both defendants' actions constitute the crime of theft, and requested lawful punishment. Both defendants raised no objections to the facts charged by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Defendant Wang's defense attorney submitted a letter of forgiveness from the victim Zhao and presented the following defense arguments: 1. Defendant Wang has the circumstance of voluntary surrender. 2. Defendant Wang is a first-time offender, has a good attitude towards repentance, the stolen goods have been recovered, and he has been forgiven by the victim. 3. Defendant Wang's family is in extreme financial difficulty. A request is made for leniency in punishment. Upon examination, it was found that one night in March 2014, defendants Wang and Xu, after planning, went to an alley near Fortune Street Community, a town street in this city, and stole a Lifan brand 110 model motorcycle parked there by the victim Zhao. Shortly thereafter, while defendant Wang was pushing the motorcycle to a motorcycle repair shop in the town to change the lock, he was discovered by the victim Zhao, who retrieved the motorcycle. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 2,400 yuan. It was also found that defendant Wang surrendered to the public security organs after the incident. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xu, and are corroborated by evidence such as the victim Zhao’s statements, testimony from witness Yan, price appraisal report, the documentary evidence of the case process, and household registration information, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On November 16, 2014, at approximately 00:58, the defendants Li and Wan, after drinking alcohol, went to the front desk of the Aired Hotel in Fanhua Road, Shushan District, in this city. They insisted on staying at the hotel despite insufficient deposit and were refused by the service staff. Wan began to insult the service staff, Jiang, and twice threw paper from the bar at Jiang. After being hit, Jiang retaliated by hitting Wan with a plastic clipboard in his hand, causing an injury to Wan's head. Subsequently, Wan and Li started to attack Jiang and vandalize items at the hotel front desk, resulting in multiple soft tissue injuries to Jiang and damage to items such as the computer monitor, fax machine, and telephone at the hotel front desk. A valuation determined that the direct economic loss due to the damage to Aired Hotel's items amounted to 10,867 yuan. On March 17, 2015, the defendant Wan voluntarily surrendered to the police; on April 20, 2015, the defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the police. In support of the above charges, the prosecution read and presented in court the confessions and defenses of the defendants Li and Wan, witness statements from Guang, Yang, and others, the statements of the victim Jiang, and the representative of the victimized unit Zhou, on-site inspection records, photos from the crime scene, audiovisual materials, valuation opinions, outpatient medical records, administrative punishment decision, account of the case process, household registration information, and other pieces of evidence.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that around October 2019, the defendant Wang met a person named \"An\" through WeChat. \"An\" told Wang that if Wang transferred money to their gambling website account via Alipay and then transferred the money back to Wang through different Alipay accounts, Wang would earn a handling fee of 120 yuan for every 10,000 yuan transferred, essentially running scores for the gambling website. Around November 14-15, 2019, the defendant Wang brought defendants Me and Zhao to Wang's residence in a certain district and purchased a large number of mobile phones. Following An's instructions, they used mobile applications like \"Zhuanqianbao\" and \"Alipay\" to assist the online gambling website in running scores to earn illicit gains. On November 25, 2019, defendants Wang, Me, Zhao, and Shao (handled in a separate case) agreed to go to a certain district of a certain city to continue using mobile applications like \"Zhuanqianbao\" and \"Alipay\" to help the online gambling website run scores. During this period, defendant Wang was responsible for leasing the venue, providing funds, and purchasing equipment, while the remaining three were responsible for specific operations, until they were arrested by public security authorities. According to the Hengxin Judicial Appraisal Center's assessment, during this period, defendant Me used Alipay to clear payments for the gambling website amounting to 759,040.96 yuan, defendant Zhao processed payments amounting to 1,120,027.59 yuan, and Shao processed payments amounting to 17,065.00 yuan. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution authority read out and presented evidence in court, including confessions of defendants Wang, Me, and Zhao, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Xie, Li, and Shao, Alipay transfer screenshots, on-site investigation records, a list of seized items, seized items, a list of returned items, electronic data inspection records, and judicial appraisal reports.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Me": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged, and this court has found, that on July 30, 2014, the victim, Xie, was lured by an online acquaintance, Ji (female, identity not verified), under the pretense of friendship, to a pyramid scheme den located on the third floor of the first house in the thirteenth row of Zhangdai Community, Zhang Village, in a certain place in Xianning City. To coerce Xie into joining the pyramid scheme and participating in its activities, the \"director\" of the den, defendant Wang, instructed defendants Yan, Qin, and other pyramid scheme members to confiscate Xie's mobile phone. They restricted Xie's personal freedom by locking the door to prevent Xie from going out freely, using verbal threats, and forcing Xie to \"attend classes.\" On September 3, 2014, this pyramid scheme den was raided by the police, and Xie was rescued. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Wang, Yan, and Qin during the court proceedings and are corroborated by relevant documentary evidence, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Zhong, Xu, and Wan, and the statement of the victim, Xie, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on December 4, 2013, the victim, Tan, contacted the defendant, Wang, through a phone number on an illegally posted advertisement to request a fetal gender determination. Defendant Wang, in collaboration with defendant Liu, drove to a location near the Hongshu Gas Station on Avenue County in a certain district of a certain city. In the car driven by defendant Liu, defendant Wang used an ultrasound machine purchased online to illegally perform a fetal gender determination for the victim, Tan. It was determined that the victim, Tan, was pregnant with a female fetus, and the parties agreed to carry out an abortion a few days later. On December 7 of the same year, defendant Wang, in collaboration with defendant Liu, drove to Mei Lake Village, on a certain lake in a certain tourism resort area, and took the victim, Tan, and her husband to a house rented by Wang located at River Pond No. xx, Jiangshan Town, a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Wang, without having a medical practitioner's qualification, illegally performed an abortion surgery on the victim, Tan. During the surgery, Tan suffered a uterine perforation, peritonitis, and intestinal perforation. It was assessed that the degree of harm was serious injury. Defendant Wang charged Tan 2,500 yuan in cash. Subsequently, according to the city's medical association, defendant Wang was found to bear full responsibility for the current damages to Tan, with these damages classified as Grade 4. A", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it is found that defendants Wu and Hu purchased cough syrup containing narcotic ingredients regulated by the state from others, and then sold it in a certain district, with the profits being equally divided between the two. On the afternoon of September 10, 2015, under police arrangement, Li contacted defendant Wu claiming someone wanted to buy cough syrup and agreed on a transaction price. Subsequently, the police arranged for Cai to purchase the cough syrup. Around 16:00 on that day, defendant Wu informed defendant Hu to conduct a transaction involving 5 bottles of cough syrup and instructed Hu to collect 850 yuan in drug money. Around 17:00, defendant Hu arrived at the south sidewalk of the pedestrian bridge section at Chiwei, Yujinghuacheng, in a certain district as agreed, and handed over 5 bottles of cough syrup (each bottle containing 120 milliliters and after testing, all were found to contain codeine) to Cai, collecting 850 yuan from Cai. After the transaction, defendant Hu was caught in the act by ambush police officers. On September 15, 2015, around 18:00, defendant Wu was apprehended by the police in Room 606 of the comprehensive building at Bibo Primary School in Luohu District, a certain city. On September 10, 2015, defendant Hu reported two drug trafficking cases to the police and assisted in the arrest of the suspects Zhou Chunchun and Hu Bin involved in the case. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the court session and are corroborated by the identity documents of the two defendants, the list of seized items, the explanation of the whereabouts of the drug money, WeChat chat records, situation explanations, arrest process, commendation materials for defendant Hu’s meritorious actions, documentary evidence, and physical evidence such as photos of the drugs and drug money involved; witness testimonies from Li and Cai; the confessions and defenses of the two defendants; the drug test report involved in this case; site survey records, site diagrams, site photos, and identification records, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: On the afternoon of November 23, 2013, in order to demand repayment from Zhang, defendant Liu took Zhang from the parking lot of the Second Cemetery in a certain city (located in a certain town). Later, defendant Liu teamed up with defendants He and Pan to successively take Zhang to various locations including an inn in the Jinshiqiao Development Zone, a fashion hotel in Quanshan District, and the rental house opposite a hotel in the same city where defendant Pan was staying, to monitor Zhang. On December 6, 2013, when the three defendants took Zhang to his mother's house to discuss repayment issues, they were caught by the police. It was also found that, after coming forward, defendant Pan truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants' actions have been forgiven by Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Pan, and He during the court trial and were confirmed by Zhang's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Du, Zhang Yi, and Zhang Bing, IOUs, loan contracts, hotel registration records, identification and recognition records and household registration certificates produced by the Public Security Bureau of Tongshan District, and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Jilin Province charged that, on the afternoon of January 11, 2021, the defendants Zhao and Yin, carrying pre-prepared tools such as shovels, crowbars, and nets, drove to Wang Xiangtun River in Dongjia Village, a town in the county. There, they broke the ice to hunt wild fish, frogs, and other animals, during which they were caught red-handed by the public security authorities, and 150 frogs were seized. Upon identification, the frogs captured by the defendants Zhao and Yin were determined to be Heilongjiang forest frogs. The two defendants voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their crimes and pled guilty.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Detention"], "Yin": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At approximately 8:30 a.m. on April 10, 2014, the defendants, Guo and Ceng, used a lock-picking technique to enter room xx, number xx, Songjia Alley, Jiangdong District, in this city to commit theft. They were subsequently apprehended by the police at the scene. During the trial, the defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the statements of the victim, Zhou, the testimonies of witnesses Shen, Li, and Chen, the search record issued by the public security organ, site photographs, the site inspection record, the identification record, the household registration certificate, the police report, the list of seized items, the statement of circumstances, and the documentation of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that from January 2014 to February 2015, the defendants Ren and Liu, a married couple, illegally demolished six old classrooms of the village elementary school. They planned to build a house for their own use on the site of the demolished classrooms. The valuation of the six old classrooms was determined to be 9,900 yuan. The defendants Ren and Liu did not contest these facts during the court proceedings, and there is corroborating evidence from witness testimonies, site photographs, and appraisal conclusions, sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Ren": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yicheng District, a certain city in Henan Province, charged that on November 23, 2017, at 19:55, police officers Cheng and Liu from a certain branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city were handling a dispute involving Nie and Kong at a restaurant located at the west section of a certain road in Yicheng District. The officers verbally summoned the individuals causing the disturbance to the public security organ for investigation. Nie and Kong, due to intoxication, refused to cooperate and falsely shouted \"police brutality,\" thereby creating an incident without cause. During the process of attempting to take them from the scene, Kong scratched officer Liu on the face and neck, while Nie seized officer Cheng's mobile phone used for illumination and caused Cheng to fall. The injury to officer Liu was assessed as minor. It was also found that after the incident, both defendants received the forgiveness of the police officers. The aforementioned facts were not disputed in court by defendants Nie and Kong, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, injury photographs, site video recordings, injury assessment reports, arrest records, household registration documents, and other evidence, providing sufficient grounds for the determination.", "label": {"Nie": ["Detention"], "Kong": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the evening of December 19, 2015, the victim, Chen, had a conflict with the staff of Puledi KTV in the Hangzhou Bay Industrial Park of a certain district in a certain city over the price of drinks. Later, Chen pushed Manager Zhou. Defendants Ye and Zheng, together with Pi and Guo (both handled in separate cases) and others, assaulted victim Chen at random in the lobby of Puledi KTV in the Hangzhou Bay Industrial Park of a certain district in a certain city to vent anger on behalf of Zhou. They also assaulted Liang, who came to intervene, and then left the scene. During this time, Defendant Ye assaulted Chen by punching and kicking him, while Defendant Zheng assaulted Chen by using a beer bottle. Later, Hu (who has been administratively punished) in the aforementioned KTV lobby had a verbal altercation with Liang, which led to a physical conflict. Defendant Ye assaulted Liang again with a wooden stick. According to the assessment, victim Chen sustained minor injuries (one instance), and victim Liang sustained minor injuries (three instances). On May 15 and June 15, 2016, Defendants Ye and Zheng turned themselves in to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the above criminal facts. It was further discovered that after the incident, victim Liang forgave the actions of Defendants Ye and Zheng. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by Defendants Ye and Zheng during the trial, supported by the confessions and defenses of Defendants Zheng and Ye, the confessions of co-defendants Pi and Guo, the statements of victims Chen and Liang, testimonies from witnesses Hu, Xu, Yang, Wang (A), Zhou, Wang (B), Peng, and Luo, on-site inspection records and photos, medical records and photos of injuries, a list of received evidence materials, decision and list of items seized and photos, identification transcripts and photos, surveillance video and screenshots, forensic medical assessment opinion on the degree of bodily injury, letter of understanding, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, account of the arrest, and the household registration data of Defendants Ye and Zheng, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that around January 11, 2018, a resident of the district, Gao (handled separately), established a WeChat gambling group. During the period when Gao and the defendant Huo co-managed this WeChat gambling group, Gao was responsible for inviting gamblers to join the group and participate in gambling. The defendant Huo was responsible for sending gambling links for \"Three Cards\" (also known as Zha Jinhua) to the WeChat group, organizing multiple gambling activities. After the gambling games ended, the defendant Huo settled the gambling funds with the participants and took a 10% commission from the top two winners. Around January 17, 2018, Gao transferred the role of group owner of the WeChat gambling group to the defendant Zhang, and both Zhang and Huo began co-managing the group. During this period, the defendant Zhang frequently changed the WeChat group's name and his nickname, with the number of participants always remaining between 40 to 50 people. During the management of the WeChat gambling group by the defendants Zhang and Huo, Zhang was responsible for inviting gamblers to join the group, while Huo used multiple WeChat accounts to send links to the \"Three Cards\" gambling games in the group, organizing multiple gambling activities daily. Once participants clicked to confirm the game, the system automatically dealt each player three poker cards, and each gambler could place bets based on their cards, with bets ranging from 1 to 10 points, where 1 point equaled 2 yuan. Each gambling game had a maximum of 20 rounds. When Huo settled the gambling funds, he took a 10% commission from the top two winners (mandatory for winnings of 30 yuan or more, not for winnings below 30 yuan). While Zhang and Huo were managing the WeChat gambling group, they collected a total commission of 25,697.37 yuan. On March 13, 2018, police officers from the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of the city arrested defendant Zhang; on April 18, 2018, defendant Huo voluntarily surrendered to the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of the city.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on the morning of July 28, 2011, defendants Xiao and Chen, along with Wang A (at large), went to a certain town in a certain county to steal a motorcycle. At approximately 11:30 a.m. that day, Xiao and Wang took a Changhe minivan with license plate number E F××××× driven by Chen to the Chengdong Gas Station in the town. The three found a Haojue Suzuki 125K two-wheeled motorcycle parked by Hu in the residential yard of the oil company next to the gas station and subsequently stole the motorcycle. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain county's Price Bureau, the motorcycle was valued at 3,280 yuan. On January 5 and February 21, 2014, Xiao and Chen were respectively arrested by police from the Fancheng District Branch of the Xiangyang City Public Security Bureau. During the trial, defendants Xiao and Chen raised no objections to the above facts, which were further supported by evidence including the registration forms of criminal cases, police dispatch work records, arrest records, a list of seized items, vehicle information forms, physical evidence photos, household registration documents, the criminal judgment, release certificates, written testimonies from witnesses such as Wang, statements from victims such as Hu, appraisal opinions from a certain county's Price Certification Center, identification records, site identification transcripts, on-site photos, as well as confessions and defenses from defendants Xiao and Chen, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charged: Between July and August 2014, the defendant Yang, in collusion with others, organized over 20 gambling gatherings in places such as the clubhouse Mahjong room at the Dahua Xixi Residence in Wuchang Street, Yuhang District, and the former Taoyuan Mahjong room at the Zijin Port Business Building in Xihu District, using the game \"Erba Gang\" played with Mahjong tiles, from which they illegally profited over 120,000 yuan by taking a cut. During this period, the defendant Wang, who was in charge of the Dahua Xixi Residence clubhouse Mahjong room, knowingly provided the venue for gambling on 8 occasions. Additionally, the defendant Ran knowingly acted as a lookout on 5 occasions. The evidence for the charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; and transcripts of inspections and identifications, among others.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ran": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of March 30, 2014, defendants Zhou and Li, after drinking and having premeditated, had Zhou drive a certain location F××××× two-wheeled motorcycle from Time Travel KTV in a certain city, heading north along Xinhua Road to reach the intersection with Renmin Road, where they brushed against a certain location F××××× car driven by Zhuang. Later, Li drove the motorcycle away from the accident scene to the Suiyuan Teahouse section where they were apprehended by police. According to the Jiaxing Municipal Public Security Forensic Center identification: the blood of defendants Zhou and Li contained ethanol, with concentrations of 2.20mg/ml and 2.07mg/ml, respectively, both exceeding the standard of 0.8mg/ml for driving a motor vehicle under the influence. Further investigations revealed that neither Zhou nor Li had a qualification for driving motorcycles, and the certain location F××××× two-wheeled motorcycle they drove had not undergone safety technical inspection. During the trial, Zhou raised no objection to the aforementioned criminal facts, which were corroborated by witness testimony, accident scene materials, driving qualification verification information, vehicle details, blood sample collection registration forms, physical examination reports, apprehension records, traffic accident determination documents, prior record materials, identification proof, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that the defendant Zhu is an officer at the XX Department of XX Company in Chengdu, responsible for information-related work, and from 2006 to the end of December 2014, was in charge of certain XX recharge management tasks. Defendant Zhu utilized the convenience of their position to recharge XX, with defendant Tao responsible for external communications and the sale of recharged XX, while defendants Yang and Fan were responsible for selling the recharged XX. The four defendants sold each card, which they recharged 1,200 times a year, each worth 600 RMB, at prices ranging from 300 RMB to 360 RMB. After sales, Zhu received 200 RMB per card, Tao received 100 RMB, and Yang and Fan received between 30 to 60 RMB. At the end of 2012 to the beginning of 2013, Tao handed over 60 recharged XX cards from Zhu to Yang and Fan to be sold at a price of 330 RMB each. At the end of 2013 to the beginning of 2014, Yang and Fan collected 180 XX cards through charging a prepaid recharge fee of 360 RMB per card, then sent the cards to Zhu via Tao for recharging, and returned them to the purchasing public. At the end of 2014, Tao collected 44 XX cards by charging a prepaid recharge fee of 300 RMB per card, handed them over to Zhu for recharging, and returned them to the purchasing public. At the same year-end, after prior agreement with Zhu and liaison by Tao, Yang and Fan collected 220 XX cards by means of charging a prepaid recharge fee of 360 RMB per card, which were later seized by the police officers.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Xu and Zhou have no objections to the basic criminal facts and charges alleged by the public prosecution, agree to the use of a summary procedure, and have signed to this effect. They also have no objections during the court hearing. The facts and evidence found through the trial are consistent with the allegations made by the public prosecution.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges that the defendant Wang, due to suspecting that the victim Huang was deliberately making things difficult for his girlfriend at work, on October 16, 2013, at approximately 22:30, went to the entrance of a plaza on Bantian Street in a certain district with the defendant Peng. Upon seeing Huang come out of the supermarket, Wang had an argument with Huang which led to a scuffle. Peng, seeing this, also went forward to hit Huang, and together they injured Huang. Wang and Peng were subsequently apprehended at the scene. According to an assessment: Huang sustained minor injuries; both Wang and Peng sustained slight injuries. After the incident, the two defendants jointly compensated the victim with 6,000 RMB, and the victim expressed understanding towards both defendants. The prosecution presented corresponding evidence, arguing that defendants Wang and Peng disregarded national law, intentionally injured another person, causing minor injury, and their actions violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting crime x, recommending a sentence of imprisonment or control detention of less than 11 months for both defendants. Defendant Wang had no objections to the charges, evidence, and sentencing recommendation from the prosecution. His defense counsel presented the following defense opinions: 1. There were reasons behind this case; 2. After the incident, the defendant compensated the victim with 6,000 RMB and received understanding; 3. The social harm of this case is not significant; 4. The defendant had a good attitude of admitting guilt after capture and showed remorse; 5. The defendant is a first-time and occasional offender without a criminal record. In summary, the defense requests the court to impose a lenient sentence and grant probation to the defendant. Defendant Peng also had no objections to the charges, evidence, and sentencing recommendation from the prosecution. The facts of the charges above were also undisputed by defendants Wang and Peng during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence provided by the public security authorities including the arrest process, household registration proof, reconciliation agreement, letter of understanding, witness testimony from Leng, statement from the victim Huang, confessions and defenses of the defendants, assessment documents, scene investigation records, and photographs, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At approximately 5 a.m. on March 22, 2014, the defendants Wei and Mo sold a small bag containing 2.9 grams of methamphetamine (\"crystal meth\") to a drug buyer, Zhong, for 450 RMB on a certain road in the Chengzhong District of this city. After the drug transaction between defendants Wei and Mo and Zhong, they were immediately apprehended by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Mo and Wei during the court trial, and they are substantiated by the testimony of witness Zhong, identification records and photos, a list and photos of seized items, photos of the drug weighing, a drug identification report, a certificate of drug seizure, the account of the arrest process, previous conviction materials, household registration proof, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of March 28, 2016, defendants Chen, Wang, and \"A\" (handled in a separate case) conspired in advance to cheat victim Sun out of more than 10,000 RMB by signaling each other and feeding cards covertly to manipulate the outcome while playing mahjong in a game room at the Jindao Hotel in Cixi City, Zhejiang Province. On the evening of April 18 of the same year, Chen, Wang, and Chai (already sentenced) conspired in advance to cheat victim Sun again out of more than 6,000 RMB by using similar tactics during a mahjong game in Room 8902 at the Ao Jie Hotel game room in Zhaoting Town, Yuyao City. On April 18, 2016, Chen was arrested by police; on June 6, 2017, Wang was arrested by police. After the crime was discovered, Chen and Chai (already sentenced) compensated Sun with 20,000 RMB, and Sun forgave Chen and the others for their conduct. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence to the court.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of December 1, 2015, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Liang in room 320 of Yihe Apartment, Xinwei Town, a certain county, to consume the drug ketamine. On the same evening, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Liang in the same location to consume methamphetamine, and later harbored drug user Dai to consume methamphetamine in the room. In the early morning of December 2 of the same month, the defendants He and Chen harbored drug user Jiang in room 320 of Yihe Apartment, Xinwei Town, a certain county, to consume both ketamine and methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts have been acknowledged by the defendants He and Chen during the court hearing, and are substantiated by evidence including the case registration form, case filing decision, household registration certificate, account of the arrest, identification transcripts, list of evidence received, CDs, identification records and photos, inspection certificate and transcripts, seizure decisions and lists, on-site inspection records and pictures, explanatory notes, on-site testing reports, administrative penalty decisions, and testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Liang, Dai, and Zhang, among others, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On the afternoon of December 2, 2013, defendants Wang and Jiang, after prior discussion, stole one iPhone 4S belonging to Yan, one Haier laptop belonging to Yan, and one Zhongderui phone belonging to Shi from Dormitory 2434, on the 4th floor of Building 8, \"Wansheng Holdings Group,\" located in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items is 5,198.95 yuan. 2. One evening in late September 2014, defendant Jiang, together with others, after prior discussion, stole one Wolong electric bicycle parked by Wu in the corridor of the dormitory building at Zhejiang Longxiang Knitting Technology Co., Ltd. in the Economic and Technological Development Zone, Paijiang, a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen vehicle is 590 yuan. On October 13, 2014, Jiang was apprehended by the Qixian Police Station of the Public Security Bureau in a certain district of a certain city for suspected drug use. During questioning, Jiang voluntarily confessed to the main facts which the public security organs had not yet discovered. Furthermore, after being captured by the public security organs, defendant Wang truthfully confessed to the main facts mentioned above. During the court hearing, Wang and Jiang raised no objections to the facts above. The case is supported by evidence such as photographs of the crime scene, purchase receipts for the involved vehicle, criminal rulings No. 47 (2011), No. 445 (2013), and No. 368 (2014) from Shaoyue Criminal Court, apprehension records and situation reports issued by the public security officers of a certain city and the Public Security Bureau of Feidong County in a certain province, statements from Yan, Shi, and Wu, the price appraisal conclusion Shaomoumojiangzi No. 0551 (2014), and the identification records of Wang and Jiang, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of April 1, 2014, the defendants Wen, Luo, and Jin went to the front of the shop at 588-Y07 Wenkang Road, Bailu Market, Yushan Town, Kunshan City, and stole one blue Zongshen brand three-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 5005 RMB) and several bags of bean sprouts parked there by the victim, Zhang. After being apprehended, defendants Wen, Luo, and Jin truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendant Wen assisted the public security organs in capturing other criminal suspects.", "label": {"Wen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Nantong City charges that: On the afternoon of December 12, 2015, defendants Li and Huang conspired to commit theft and went to South Street in a certain district of this city to look for a target. At around 7 p.m. that night, defendants Li and Huang, at the north gate of Wenfeng World in a certain district of this city, used the method of Li stealing and Huang keeping watch to opportunistically steal a Bifer BF-T12 model phone from the right pocket of the victim, Ding. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 20 RMB. That evening, defendants Li and Huang were arrested and brought to justice by the public security authorities. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Huang truthfully confessed to their crimes. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Huang during the trial, and are corroborated by the evidence presented by the public prosecutor, including the confessions of defendants Li and Huang during the investigation stage, the statement of the victim Ding, the testimonies of witnesses Sun and Yang, the records and photos of the defendants Li and Huang identifying the crime scene, the seizure decision and seizure record by the public security authorities, the seizure list and the list of returned items, the price certification opinion issued by the Nantong City Price Certification Center regarding the phone, the process of bringing Li and Huang to justice issued by the public security authorities, the household registration materials of defendants Li and Huang, the (2006) Xiang Criminal First Instance No. 330 Criminal Judgment of the Xiangshan District People's Court of a certain city, the release certificate from a prison in a certain city of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, the (2006) Star Criminal First Instance No. 103 Criminal Judgment of the Qixing District People's Court of a certain city, and the release certificate from a prison in a certain city of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, among others. All the aforementioned evidence was verified and confirmed as having probative value during the court trial, and this court accepts it as valid.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention"], "Huang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that at around 23:30 on November 2, 2019, defendants Cui and Yang had a dispute with bar staff over trivial matters at a bar on Wenzhou Pedestrian Street in Yicheng District, Zhumadian City. During the handling of the situation by the police, Cui, Yang, and others refused to cooperate and verbally abused, pulled, and kicked the officers, resulting in minor injuries (slight abrasions) to Officer Jia and others. Subsequently, the police forcibly brought Cui and Yang to the public security bureau for processing. After the incident, the officers performing their duties expressed understanding towards Cui and Yang. It was also found that after the incident, other individuals involved had been administratively punished by the public security bureau. After being brought to the case, defendants Cui and Yang truthfully confessed to the facts of obstructing police officers from executing their duties through violent means. These facts were not disputed by defendants Cui and Yang during the trial and were substantiated by witness testimonies, audio-visual materials, documentary evidence, and other evidence, which is sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a Hui area accused that at around 1:00 a.m. on September 11, 2015, the defendant Xu, due to the loss of his motorcycle, proposed to the defendants Duan, Wei, and Wang (under sixteen years old), and Xi (identity unknown) to steal a motorcycle, which they agreed to. The defendants Xu and others found a red and white \"Hailing\" brand high-handlebar racing motorcycle in the parking shed of a hospital in a certain county. Xu, along with Wang and Xi, lifted the locked motorcycle out of the shed, while Duan and Wei kept watch. Xu, Wang, and Xi moved the motorcycle near a community next to the hospital through the hospital's fence. Xu then called defendants Wei and Duan to come to the vicinity of the community. After breaking the lock of the motorcycle with tools, Duan connected the wires of the motorcycle, and Xu rode it away. Later, while Xu was riding the motorcycle in a township, he was spotted by the owner, who reported it to the police. After the case was solved, the stolen motorcycle was returned to the victim. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen motorcycle was 5,850 yuan. Additionally, after the incident, defendants Xu and Wei voluntarily surrendered to the authorities.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Duan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that Huang B (already sentenced) and the victim, Yang, had several disputes due to street vending. On June 5, 2013, at about 1 p.m., Huang B called Huang A (handled in another case) and defendants Jiang and Li, among others, to the road in front of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China on Renmin Middle Road, Xingning District, in a certain city. They assaulted Yang with beer bottles, resulting in injuries to Yang's body and head. Forensic identification determined the degree of physical injury to the victim Yang as serious. Defendant Li surrendered to the public security authorities on October 8, 2013, and defendant Jiang was arrested by the police on September 2. After the incident, Huang B, Huang A, and defendants Jiang and Li reached a settlement agreement with the victim Yang, compensating Yang a total of 120,000 yuan for various economic losses, of which Huang B compensated 85,000 yuan, Huang A compensated 10,000 yuan, defendant Li compensated 11,000 yuan, and defendant Jiang compensated 14,000 yuan. The families of Huang B, Huang A, and defendants Jiang and Li have paid the compensation, and the victim Yang has forgiven them, requesting the court to be lenient in sentencing. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jiang and Li during the trial, and are confirmed by the victim's statement, witness testimonies, forensic medical injury identification report, forensic medical injury appraisal report, seizure list, account of the case, records and photos of crime scene identification, household registration certificates, mediation agreement, receipts and letters of forgiveness, and the defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it was found that at approximately 16:30 on June 2, 2017, the defendant Liu was driving a school bus with the license plate Hubei B××××× from a certain district's kindergarten located at the Oriental Decoration City in Huangshi City towards Daqian Road, Huangshi City. When reaching the section of Daqian Road near Sanjiang Gonghecheng, the vehicle was stopped for inspection by on-duty police officers. Upon inspection, the officers discovered that the school bus driven by Liu was approved to carry 26 passengers, but was actually carrying 41 passengers, which exceeded the approved number by more than 50%. The defendant Huang is the legal representative of the kindergarten in that district. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings. This is corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Huang, Li, Hu, Zhang, and others, as well as evidence from the process of how the case was brought to court, household registration certificates, driver information inquiry results, the kindergarten's school bus safety responsibility document, school bus route list, the confessions of defendants Liu and Huang, and video surveillance footage and screenshots of the route taken by the school bus with license plate Hubei B×××××. The evidence is reliable, sufficient, and conclusive.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Yuecheng City charges that at around 2 a.m. on May 2, 2013, the defendants Cai and Zhu, after prior collusion, followed the victim Nong into the alley next to a restaurant on Victory West Road in a certain district of the city. Defendant Cai took the opportunity when the victim Nong was alone to grab the bag hanging on Nong's shoulder. The victim Nong held on to the bag with great effort. Seeing the situation, defendant Zhu stepped forward to assist. During the struggle for the bag, the strap broke, causing the victim to fall to the ground and drop a Dika cellphone. Defendant Cai then took the bag and picked up the cellphone, and escaped from the scene together with defendant Zhu. The two defendants obtained over 920 RMB, a Dika cellphone valued at 390 RMB, and a Samsung cellphone valued at 123 RMB. Afterwards, defendant Cai received over 520 RMB and the Dika cellphone; defendant Zhu received over 400 RMB and the Samsung cellphone. At around 7 p.m. on May 23, 2013, defendant Cai was arrested by public security at the Shuangjigong restaurant on Fushou West Road in a certain district of the city; at around 10 p.m. the same day, defendant Zhu was arrested by public security at the Yueyue Internet Cafe on Choujiang Street, Yiwu City, in a certain province. After the incident, the stolen Dika cellphone was recovered and returned to the victim. Defendants Cai and Zhu compensated the victim Nong 500 RMB and 700 RMB respectively. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Cai and Zhu during the court trial, and were substantiated by the victim Nong's statement, price appraisal conclusion, identification record and on-site photos, list of seized and returned items, statement of circumstances, description of the arrest process, receipts, summary of personnel information, proof of household registration, and other evidence, sufficient to reach a determination.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the indictment by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city, on the evening of January 27, 2016, at about 8 PM, the defendant Liao, in collaboration with the defendant Tan, committed theft at the night market on Gaofeng Road in the said district of the city. Defendant Tan acted as a lookout while defendant Liao executed the theft, stealing a DOOV T90 mobile phone from the right pocket of victim Mao Mouzhen's coat. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen mobile phone was valued at 423 RMB. \n\nFurthermore, it was found that on the evening of January 27, 2016, plainclothes police officers were conducting undercover surveillance on Chaoyang Road in the said district. At around 8 PM that evening, the police observed two men stealing someone else's property and fleeing the scene at the night market on Gaofeng Road. The police then proceeded to apprehend them. Subsequently, the police apprehended the two individuals near the entrance of Xinghe Decheng Times. Upon investigation, one of the men was identified as Liao and the other as Tan. The stolen DOOV T90 mobile phone was recovered from Liao’s possession. On January 28, 2016, the police returned the confiscated stolen phone to the victim.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liao and Tan during the court proceedings. The case is supported by the following evidence: registration form of the case, decision to file the case, statement by victim Mao Mouzhen, process of apprehension, list of items seized, list of items returned, identification record and photographs of the crime scene, price appraisal report, notice of appraisal opinion, household registration certificate, and confessions and defenses of the defendants Liao and Tan, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 19:00 on January 31, 2013, the defendants Liu and Lu, along with Dong B, Qin B (both already sentenced), and others, engaged in gambling using the method of \"catching a single six\" at the store of a fellow villager Lu A. That evening, the victims Liao and Wei also participated in the gambling. During this time, Dong B accused Liao of cheating and demanded that Liao return the money he had lost, slapping Liao in the face. Subsequently, Qin B, Liu, Lu, and others also demanded that Liao return the money due to their losses, and they punched and kicked Liao and Wei. Later, Liao returned 1,500 yuan to Dong B and 600 yuan to Lu. Dong B and others then threatened Liao with further assault if he did not bring another 10,000 yuan to reimburse them. Consequently, Wei called his wife to deliver 10,000 yuan to Qin B, after which they were able to leave. On April 11, 2014, Liu was apprehended by the police. On May 13, 2014, Lu voluntarily turned himself in to the police. It was also found that the defendants Liu and Lu had obtained the forgiveness of the victims Liao A and Wei A. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants and their defense lawyers during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as the case registration form, statements of victims Liao and Wei, testimonies of witnesses Dong A and Qin A, on-site inspection, identification records, site location maps, site photos, site identification photos, confessions of defendants Liu, Lu, and co-defendants Dong B and Qin B, apprehension process, household registration certificates, explanatory materials, and the criminal judgment document (2013) Jiang Criminal First Instance No. 354. Liu's defense counsel proposed that there were reasons behind the incident, that the victims’ forgiveness had been obtained, that Liu had a good attitude towards admitting guilt, and that he was willing to pay a fine, recommending that the court apply probation to Liu.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that from the end of August 2012 to September 7 of the same year, the defendants Hu and Yang, together with Hong (already sentenced) and others, for the purpose of profit-making, gathered at the Caidiexuan Café, Zunpin Café, Congress KTV in Cixi City, organized Jin, Su, Xu, Zheng, and others to gamble in the form of \"Niuhonghong,\" thereby illegally profiting over 20,000 RMB. On July 31, 2013, defendant Hu turned himself in to the Gutang Police Station of Cixi Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Yang truthfully confessed to the above-mentioned criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Yang during the trial and are corroborated by the confession of co-defendant Hong, the testimonies of witnesses Jin, Su, Xu, and Zheng, identification records and photographs, the criminal judgment of the co-defendant, details of the appearance and arrest, and the identification documents of defendants Hu and Yang, which are sufficient to establish.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that in early March 2020, \"San Jiao Jiao\" (handled in a separate case) invited Gong to help sell methamphetamine while using drugs with him, promising that Gong could consume methamphetamine with her, and Gong agreed. Subsequently, Gong contacted Chen, asking Chen to help find buyers for methamphetamine, and promised Chen could use methamphetamine for free. Despite knowing Gong was trafficking drugs, Chen agreed to Gong's request. On a day before the Qingming Festival in 2020, a man nicknamed \"Bo Mo\" contacted Chen by phone to purchase methamphetamine. Chen and Gong arranged to meet \"Bo Mo\" near a certain location in a town in Baojing County, where \"Bo Mo\" gave Gong 100 yuan in exchange for a small packet of methamphetamine. On March 9, 2020, Zhou contacted Chen by phone to purchase drugs. Chen introduced Zhou's WeChat to Gong, and subsequently, between March 2020 and April 2020, Zhou contacted Gong through WeChat and purchased methamphetamine 11 times, paying more than 3,000 yuan.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court investigation found: Prior to the incident, defendants Ju and Guo agreed to go to a certain place to commit theft. Therefore, on October 3, 2013, at approximately 1 p.m., defendant Ju and Guo separately took bus rides from certain locations in a certain city and province to meet in front of Mingzhu Building in a certain city. After planning, they targeted a single woman, Xing Moujia, who was carrying a backpack, in the underground mall on Shangxiu Street. Ju and Guo approached and bumped into Xing Moujia, allowing Ju the opportunity to steal a Xiaomi Redmi phone from her backpack. The victim later called the police.\n\nDefendant Ju handed the phone to defendant Guo at the entrance of Hualian Shopping Mall, where Guo was subsequently apprehended by the police. The stolen phone was seized and returned to the owner. The appraisal valued the phone at 1,128 RMB. Additionally, it was found that defendant Ju turned himself in to the public security organs voluntarily, under the persuasion of relatives, on October 8, 2013.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ju and Guo during the court hearing. They were substantiated by their statements to the police, the victim Xing Moujia's statement, the police's list of seized and returned items, the price verification report, the identification record, the criminal judgment and release certificate, the auditory evoked potential test report and diagnosis certificate from the city's People's Hospital, the account statement, basic resident information, and other evidence, which is sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ju": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that on April 12, 2012, at around 1 PM, defendants Zhao, Zheng, Yu, and Ma received a phone call from Li A (already sentenced) and followed Xu XX, Li A, Liu XX, Jiang XX, Shi XX, Zhu XX, He XX, Dou XX, Chang XX, Tian XX, Huo XX, and Zhang A (all already sentenced) to the high store front of Shih XX, a merchant in the fourth phase of the Lotus Market, to \"maintain the scene\" for Shih XX, in an attempt to resolve a dispute between Shih XX and Qiu XX of the neighboring shop. During the confrontation between the parties, a fight broke out between the women Shih XX, Wei XX, Wang XX, and Kang No. 2, Meng XX from Qiu XX's shop. Following this, Li B, Zhang B, Gao XX, and others, who came to find Qiu XX, had a verbal altercation with Xu XX, Li A, Jiang XX, and others, which escalated into a brawl. During the brawl, Tian XX threw the victim Li B to the ground, and Li A struck Li B on the head with a wooden stick, resulting in Li B's death due to severe cranial brain injury.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 3:00 PM on April 17, 2014, the defendant Chen, without obtaining a motor vehicle driver's license, drove a small ordinary passenger car with the license plate Lu G××××× under the influence of alcohol, traveling west to east along Xueguan Road in a certain city until reaching a road section in a township village. At this point, the car collided with a small sedan, license plate Lu B×××××, driven by Yu. After the accident, in order to evade legal consequences, the defendant Liu, also under the influence of alcohol, drove the small ordinary passenger car with the license plate Lu G×××××, assisting the defendant Chen in fleeing. According to the forensic evaluation, the ethanol content detected in the venous blood of defendant Chen was 179.9mg/100ml, and the ethanol content detected in the venous blood of defendant Liu was 141.5mg/100ml. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the two defendants during the court hearing and were corroborated by documentary evidence, including statements concerning the capture of the criminal suspects, the criminal judgment, the administrative penalty decision by the Public Security Bureau of the city, the road traffic accident identification report, household registration certificates, and witness testimony from Yu, among other evidence.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused: 1. On the midnight of May 31, 2017, defendants Xiao and Zhou, in collaboration with Tan (already sentenced), went to the ground floor garage at No. 5, Building 2, Lane 418, Zhou East Road, a town in this district, which is the residence of victim Zhu 1, father of Zhu A, to whom they were pressing for debt repayment. They used spray paint to damage the stainless steel security windows and aluminum doors and windows of the garage. They then proceeded to another village in the town, at address XXX, residence of victim Zhu B, sister of Zhu A, using spray paint to deface the exterior walls of Zhu B's residence. An appraisal determined that the damage to the property was valued at 2,907 RMB and 555 RMB respectively. 2. In the early morning of June 2, 2017, defendants Xiao and Zhou, again collaborating with Tan, went to the same garage of victim Zhu 1 for the purpose of pressing Zhu A for debt repayment and used bricks to smash the doors and window glass of the garage. The damage was appraised at 519 RMB. On June 2, 2017, defendant Xiao was summoned by the public security organs but only truthfully confessed to the above facts during the review and prosecution phase. On September 28, 2017, defendant Zhou was apprehended by local police authorities in a city of a certain province and confessed truthfully to the above facts upon arrival. The family of co-defendant Tan has made economic compensation for the above-mentioned losses to the victims. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xiao and Zhou during the trial, and were substantiated by the verified statements of victims Zhu 1, Zhu B, and Fu, the testimonies of witnesses Zheng, Tang, and Mei, the confession and identification record of co-defendant Tan, the testimony and identification record of witness Zhang, the pricing appraisal report by the Price Appraisal Center of Pudong New Area, Shanghai, related receipts and loan contracts, details of the case occurrence and apprehension, related criminal judgment documents, defendants Xiao and Zhou's confessions after arriving at the case, and household registration information, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: 1. On an afternoon around October 28, 2013, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to \"Yan Zi Wu\" clothing store on the main street of a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Li, Yang, Ma, Lin, Fang, and others to gamble using the \"Tong Zi Gong\" method, taking over 1500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 2. On a night around November 3 of the same year, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 2-2, Gu Jia Zha Ji, Gangzhong Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Shen, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the \"Tong Zi Gong\" method, taking over 1000 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 3. On an afternoon around November 7 of the same month, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 1, Bei Xu Jia Wan, Shantang Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Lu, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the \"Tong Zi Gong\" method, taking over 3500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. 4. On an afternoon around November 11 of the same month, defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang went to No. 2, Gao Jia Zha Ji, Shantang Village, a town in a city to open a gambling den. They organized Feng, Ma, Li, Lin, and others to gamble using the \"Tong Zi Gong\" method, taking over 1500 yuan in profit from organizing the gambling activities. It was further found that defendants Zhu, Xu, and Zhang turned themselves in to the Dushangang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on January 1, January 3, and January 6, 2014, respectively. The aforementioned criminal facts were undisputed by defendants Xu, Zhu, and Zhang during the court trial. Furthermore, there is sufficient evidence such as a case registration form, witness testimony, previous criminal judgments, administrative penalty decisions by public security, proof of illegal and criminal experience inquiry, processing of arrival, and identity verification to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: In October 2013, Huai'an City Dingshun Pipeline Co., Ltd. was conducting pipe jacking operations at a construction site in a certain area and nearby a certain town. On October 10, 2013, around 5 pm, after construction, the company left a flow channel reamer used for drilling holes under an advertisement board at the northwest corner of the site without arranging for someone to watch over it. At around 7 pm that evening, the defendants Gao and Ding, passing by, discovered the reamer and lifted it onto Ding's flatbed cart, covering it with a plastic woven bag. The two defendants later sold the reamer for 160 yuan, splitting the proceeds. According to a price appraisal, the stolen item was valued at 9,200 yuan. After the incident, the stolen item was recovered. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Gao and Ding during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of Wang, an employee of the victimized unit, along with the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Yang, Han, Wang Yi, Wang Bing, Li, identification records and photos, lists of seized and returned items, photos of the stolen item, the price appraisal report, an account of the incident, and explanations of the defendants' apprehension, which are sufficient to be believed.", "label": {"Gao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At the end of 2013, China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., Ltd. undertook the Dongzaolu Road project in a certain town of a district in a city. In the early morning of March 7, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Yu, under the arrangement of others, drove two twin-axle construction trucks with the license plates xxx from a certain place to the Dongzaolu Road construction site in a certain town of a district in a city, and parked the trucks on the construction road until 10:30 a.m., causing the construction party to be unable to work for three and a half hours. It was identified that the direct economic loss to the construction party was 24,775 yuan. Further investigation revealed that both defendants were drivers of transportation vehicles for the Dongzaolu Road project site in a certain town of a district in a city. On the day of the incident, to prevent other vehicles from entering the project site for transportation, they parked their vehicles on the construction road, resulting in the inability of the project to proceed normally. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial and were substantiated by their household registration certificates and confessions, the report materials from China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Co., Ltd., the testimonies of witnesses Lu xx, Chang xx, Meng xx, He xx, Wei xx, Sang xx, Wang xx, He xx, Tang xx, Qiang xx, Zhang xx, Ming xx, Zhang xx, Yang xx, Chen xx, Wang xx, and Wang xx, identification records, photos of the vehicles used in the crime, an accounting audit report, and the arrest documentation provided by the public security authority, which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Northern District of a certain city charges that on December 11, 2015, at approximately 21:00, the defendants Zhu and Wu, after conspiring to commit theft, followed Wei to the night market on Caishi Second Road in the Northern District of a certain city. Zhu used tweezers to remove a white Xiaomi brand Redmi Note mobile phone (valued at 200 RMB) from the right pocket of Wei's jacket and handed it to Wu. The two were apprehended by public security officers while fleeing the scene. The stolen item was recovered and returned to the victim, Wei. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence in court: 1. Documentary evidence: The case registration form, a report on the case resolution, a report on the arrest, household registration proof, criminal judgment, release certificate, seizure list, return list, etc.; 2. Statement of the victim Wei; 3. Testimonies of witnesses including Zhou; 4. Confessions and defense statements of the defendants Zhu and Wu; 5. Expert opinion: Valuation assessment report of the items involved from a certain province; 6. Records of examination, inspection, identification, and investigative experiments: Identification records, etc.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: \n\n1. At 4:37 a.m. on January 2, 2015, the defendants Liang and He went to the parking lot on the first floor of a rental building at a certain lane in Demingli, a certain village, a certain bay, a certain district, a certain city. They used tools such as wrenches and wire cutters to steal a XiDeSheng Leopard Model 2 xd3 electric bicycle worth RMB 2,232 belonging to the victim Yu, and a XiDeSheng 26-inch 2014 Model Zhuri 700 mountain bike worth RMB 1,947 belonging to the victim Han.\n\n2. At around 4 a.m. on the 4th of the same month, the defendants Liang and He, along with another male, used similar methods at the same location to steal an AIMA 14-inch Baby Model 3 electric bicycle worth RMB 2,016 belonging to the victim Chen, and a XiDeSheng 26-inch 2015 Model Zhuri 700 mountain bike worth RMB 2,050 belonging to the victim Han.\n\nOn the 6th of the same month, the defendants Liang and He were caught by police officers while preparing to commit theft in a certain village in a certain district, a certain city, and a batch of tools, including wire cutters, were confiscated.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liang and He during the hearing. Evidence submitted by the public prosecution agency, verified in court, included: a certificate from the Dubu Police Station of the Yangshan County Public Security Bureau, records of the arrest process, sales (warranty) registration forms for the bicycles, sales invoices for the electric bikes, search records, seizure records, a list of seized items and photos of said items, an explanation of the image production, statements from the victims Han, Yu, and Chen, screenshots from videos depicting the thefts by Liang, He, and others, a property price appraisal report from the Price Certification Center of a certain district in a certain city, and the confessions and identification records of the defendants Liang and He, all proving these facts conclusively.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: In May and June 2014, at the request of the defendant Zhang, Qi, the defendant Qi assisted Zhang, Qi in purchasing a \"fake base station\" device. On June 9 of the same year, after Qi helped Zhang, Qi obtain the \"fake base station\" equipment, the device was used to illegally occupy the frequency utilized by a country's mobile communications, forcibly sending messages to unspecified mobile users of certain country's mobile communication companies. The next day, Qi helped Zhang, Qi edit two text messages, which Zhang, Qi then used the \"fake base station\" device to send, totaling more than 300,000 messages. According to assessments, between June 9 and 16, the defendants Zhang, Qi and Qi caused disruptions to the communications of over ten thousand users, with outages lasting less than an hour, by utilizing the \"fake base station.\" At around 9 PM on June 16, 2014, police discovered a suspicious vehicle near the Youth Sunshine Hotel on Liu Ong West Road in a town in a certain city and apprehended the suspicious defendant Zhang, Qi in the vehicle. After questioning, the defendant Zhang, Qi voluntarily confessed to the criminal acts. The following day, Zhang, Qi assisted police in apprehending the defendant Qi. The facts aforementioned were uncontested by Zhang, Qi and Qi during the court hearing, and are sufficiently corroborated by evidence such as the \"fake base station\" equipment (including one converter, one battery, one SMS transmitter, one mobile phone, one antenna, and one laptop), a list of seized items, photographs, account transaction information, logistics receipts, the arrest account, statements, search records, electronic evidence examination reports, test reports, criminal judgment documents, compulsory detoxification decision documents, labor reeducation decision certificates, labor reeducation release documents, criminal record verification, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Qi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Chengzhong District, a certain city, charges: On December 16, 2017, at approximately 20:00, the defendants Yang and Wei, after premeditating, went to the jewelry counter on the first floor of the Sanfu Mall on Jiefang South Road in Chengzhong District of a certain city. Wei acted as the lookout, while Yang stole an Apple 7 Plus mobile phone worth 5600 RMB from the outer coat pocket of the victim, Zhu. Subsequently, Wei sold the stolen phone for 2300 RMB and shared 1200 RMB with Yang. On December 19, 2017, and January 31, 2018, respectively, Yang and Wei were apprehended by the public security organ. The actions of the defendants Yang and Wei constitute the crime of theft, and this court is requested to punish them according to the law. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Yang and Wei during the court trial process, and are confirmed by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, the statement of the victim Zhu, photos and records of identification, the price appraisal conclusion, the accounts of the arrest, the criminal record, and the confessions of defendants Yang and Wei. These are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges:\n\n1. On the evening of September 18, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a children's clothing store next to a certain kindergarten in a certain city and stole a dark maroon Xinlei brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,516 belonging to victim Jiang.\n\n2. At noon on September 19, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, in collusion with others and after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a certain restaurant in a certain city and stole a champagne-colored Xinri brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,257 belonging to victim Hou.\n\n3. On the afternoon of September 30, 2015, defendants Shi and Xue, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of a clothing store under Building 21 of a certain new town in a certain city and stole a black Yongyuan brand electric bicycle worth RMB 2,496 belonging to victim Li.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused defendants Wang and Sun of being unemployed individuals. The two rented an apartment at Unit 3, Room 301, Building 11, Fuhui Garden Community, Fushan District, Yantai City. Between May and August 17, 2016, for profit, the two harbored Li1 and Li2 for prostitution in the apartment. Defendant Wang used QQ to post solicitation information, recruiting and introducing clients for Li1 and Li2. Defendants Wang and Sun received over 7,000 RMB in illicit proceeds from the prostitution fees. On the afternoon of August 17, 2016, while defendants Wang and Sun were harboring Li1 and Li2 for prostitution in the apartment, they were caught on the spot by policemen from the Fushan Branch of Yantai City Public Security Bureau. At the same time, the clients Lin and Chen were also apprehended, and 600 RMB in prostitution fees were confiscated. The prosecuting authority provided relevant evidence to substantiate the alleged criminal facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 19:00 on March 24, 2016, with funds provided by the defendant Chen, the defendant Zhang purchased the drug \"Magu\" and registered room 202 at the \"Haoyuan Hotel\" on Sports Road, Xiannüshan Subdistrict Office, in a certain city. The two defendants prepared drug paraphernalia together in that room and accommodated Xiong, Wang, and Pan to consume drugs, whereupon they were apprehended by the police officers. According to the identification, the urine of defendants Zhang, Chen, as well as Xiong, Wang, and Pan tested positive for methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Pan, Xiong, Wang, and Li, along with inspection records, seizure lists, on-site photos, identification memos and photos, drug testing reports, on-site testing reports, urine sample extraction records, urine test board photos, administrative penalty decisions, defendants' basic information, and the synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogation, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On July 22, 2014, at approximately 1 p.m., the defendant Mao carried heroin, and the defendant Liao drove a motorcycle to transport Mao from a city in a certain province to a specific village in a town in Zengcheng City. When conducting a drug transaction with Ruan M., they were caught by the police on the spot. The police seized a package of suspected drugs (after testing, heroin was detected, with a net weight of 0.29 grams) and 200 RMB in cash, suspected to be drug money.", "label": {"Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Third District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on May 3, 2014, at around 12:30 AM, the defendants Liu and Huang, along with Xie A (handled in a separate case), used a pre-prepared knife in the greenbelt section near the entrance of the Jinlei Industrial Park on Keyuan Avenue, in a certain town's industrial area, to rob the victims Lu and Yang. They seized one white Vivo BBK phone (valued at 1200 yuan) and 30 yuan, and then fled the scene. At around 1 AM on the same day, police arrested Xie A, Liu, and Huang near the greenbelt outside the wall of the Jinlei Industrial Park in a certain town. After the case was solved, all stolen money and property were returned to the victims. To support the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Xie and Li, statements and identification of stolen goods by the victims Lu and Yang, on-site investigation and inspection records, experimental investigation records, search records, one folding knife, the appraisal report of the property's value, case documentation, permanent resident information, lists of seized and returned items, a video disc of the interrogation and on-site identification, along with the defendants Liu and Huang's confessions, recognition records, and photos of the identification; it thus believes that the defendants Liu and Huang conspired to use a knife to forcibly seize the property of others at the scene, which violates the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Given the defendants Liu and Huang's good attitude in confessing and the return of the stolen money and property to the victims, a mitigated punishment is legally permissible. It is recommended that defendants Liu and Huang be sentenced to three to five years of fixed-term imprisonment and fined. This court is requested to impose a sentence according to the law. In court, the defendants Liu and Huang raised no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations put forward by the prosecution and did not provide any defense. Upon examination, it was found that the prosecution’s charges of x crime against the defendants Liu and Huang were factually clear and the evidence was true and sufficient, which this court confirms.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that in July 2013, defendants Ye and Zhang, together with Yuan A and Luo A (both previously convicted), and others, manufactured counterfeit cigarettes at a pig farm in a certain town of a certain city. Ye was responsible for keeping watch nearby, while Zhang helped to purchase groceries and daily necessities for the people at the counterfeit cigarette production site and also issued workers' wages once. On August 1, 2013, the public security bureau of the city investigated the counterfeit cigarette production site and seized a batch of raw materials, finished counterfeit cigarettes, and production machines. According to the price certification center of the municipal price bureau, the price of tobacco leaves and finished counterfeit cigarettes was 1,220,749 yuan. After the incident, defendants Ye and Zhang fled but voluntarily surrendered to the municipal public security bureau and truthfully confessed their criminal acts on January 21, 2015. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Ye and Zhang during the court hearing. Additionally, these facts were corroborated by the confessions of defendants Ye and Zhang, the confessions of co-defendants Yuan B, Luo B, and a person named Tu, testimonies from witnesses Chen and Deng, the circumstances of arrest, identification records, on-site inspection records and photographs, inspection records from the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau, a list of seized items, a test report from Guangdong Tobacco Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, the municipal price bureau's appraisal opinion on the price of items, and the household registration certificates of defendants Ye and Zhang. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the findings.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charged that between October 2019 and January 2020, the defendants Zhou and Yu, without obtaining a mining and sand extraction permit, illegally extracted sand from a certain pond in a certain city under the pretense of cleaning the pond. They then sold the sand to a certain company in the city at a price of RMB 38.00 to 40.00 per cubic meter. According to an appraisal, the amount of sand extracted was 9,360.10 cubic meters, valued at RMB 187,202.00. Following the incident, the defendants Zhou and Yu voluntarily surrendered to the authorities. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Yu voluntarily handed over RMB 100,000.00 of illegal proceeds; on September 29, 2020, the defendant Zhou voluntarily handed over RMB 30,000.00 of illegal proceeds. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution agency read out and presented documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhou and Yu in court.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that defendant Li began renting and operating \"Hao Ju Tea House\" at No. 2 He'an Road, Cangmen Village, Jun'an Town, Shunde District, Foshan City on September 1, 2016, later hiring defendant Chen to help run the tea house. In mid-January 2018, Li, in collaboration with others, set up a gambling den at the tea house to attract people to gamble. Chen assisted Li in managing the casino matters, and defendant Yuan was responsible for dealing cards and collecting commission. On January 31, 2018, the police uncovered the casino, apprehending 18 people involved in gambling on the spot, and seizing RMB 8,096 in gambling funds. During the operation of this casino, a total commission of about RMB 50,000 was collected, with Li and Chen each receiving approximately RMB 7,000.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. The defendants, Chen and Xu, along with Luo and Zhong (already sentenced), on April 4, 2019, in a rental room at a certain square in a district of this city, accused the victim, Shi, of stealing Luo's property. They physically assaulted Shi and threatened to call the police to extort 15,000 RMB from him. Later, fearing that Shi might report them to the police, Chen, Xu, Luo, and Zhong each returned part of the extorted money and, under Xu's name, returned 5,000 RMB to the victim Shi. 2. On April 6, 2019, Chen, Xu, Luo, and Zhong, in a hotel room in Jingtai Street, a district of this city, accused the victim, Lu, of cheating in gambling. They assaulted Lu and threatened to report him to the police, forcibly extorting over 50,000 RMB and an iPhone XS Max (valued at 6,953 RMB) from him. Upon returning to the case, Chen truthfully confessed his criminal acts. After committing the crime, Xu voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed his criminal acts. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecutor read and presented evidence in court, including Alipay transfer records, the \"Price Identification Conclusion\" document, statements from the victims Shi and Lu, confessions and defenses by the defendants Chen and Xu, identification records, and WeChat transfer records.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from April to June 2019, the defendants Wu and Chen, having conspired, carried out the following scheme: Defendant Wu pretended to chat with the victims while defendant Chen pretended to drop an envelope containing spirit money while asking for directions. Defendant Wu picked up the envelope and proposed to the victims to \"split the money.\" Subsequently, defendant Chen pretended to return looking for the money. Defendant Wu took out cash from his person to falsely prove he did not pick up the money, thereby deceiving the victims into taking out cash they were carrying. Defendant Wu then placed the victims' cash into a black handbag and returned the black handbag containing the spirit money to the victims before fleeing the scene. In this manner, the defendants defrauded victim Cheng out of 1,000 yuan, victim Liu of 2,800 yuan, and victim Wen of 3,300 yuan near the Cancer Hospital on Kaixuan Street, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan City. The ill-gotten gains were split between the two defendants and squandered. These facts were not contested by defendants Wu and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the investigation report, the details of their capture, statements from victims Cheng, Liu, and Wen, identification records, search records, seizure warrants, inventory of seized items, photographs of tools used in the crime, confessions of defendants Wu and Chen, and evidence of their residential registration and prior offenses, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in early February 2012, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu conspired together while dining at a restaurant in a certain county (hereafter referred to as \"the county\") to install eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in the office of Secretary Hu of the County Committee. They planned to secretly record leaders' private and disciplinary violation videos to blackmail them for promotions. On February 26, 2012, after defendants Li and Liu respectively transferred 1,500 and 2,000 yuan to defendant Yang's China Construction Bank account, defendant Yang purchased the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in a certain place. On March 6 of the same year, defendants Li and Yang bought a \"Qinyuan\" brand water dispenser, the same model as in Secretary Hu's office, at a Haier appliance store in the county. That evening, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu installed the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment in the purchased water dispenser. Subsequently, defendant Li used the opportunity of being on duty at the County Committee to secretly make a copy of the key to Hu's office and, together with defendant Yang, secretly entered Secretary Hu's office, replacing the water dispenser in Hu's office with the one containing the equipment. From March to early October 2012, defendant Li used a Lenovo laptop provided by defendant Liu, along with the eavesdropping and surveillance equipment, to illegally monitor and record Secretary Hu, storing the illegally obtained video footage on a Lenovo external hard drive he purchased. During the National Day holiday in 2012, defendants Li and Yang once again secretly entered Hu's office and replaced the current water dispenser with the one containing the surveillance equipment. At the same time, defendant Li edited part of the recorded video and stored it on an MP4 player he bought. After discussing it amongst themselves, on the afternoon of October 17 of the same year, defendant Li approached Hu and played the related video on the MP4 player for Hu, unlawfully demanding political benefits for the three defendants. That evening, Hu reported the incident to the Huaihua State Security Bureau. Subsequently, defendants Li, Yang, and Liu were successively apprehended by the public security organs. In light of the above facts, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A Municipal People's Procuratorate charged that around 10 a.m. on May 3, 2014, the defendants Wu and Liang, after conspiring, carried pre-prepared tools such as scissors and hex keys to the parking area in the alley beside Huimin Shopping Mall in a certain town of the city. They started the engine of a red men's two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim, Huang, by cutting the wires with scissors, and stole it (valued at RMB 2380). After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. On May 6, 2014, around 10 a.m., defendants Wu and Liang, after conspiring again, went to the entrance of a rental house to the right of Luo Jian Village No. 2 Primary School in a certain town of the city. They stole a Fengtian brand women's two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at RMB 3565) and a Xiaomi 2S mobile phone (valued at RMB 1338) placed inside the vehicle belonging to the victim, Zhang, by starting the motorcycle engine in the same manner. After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. On May 13, 2014, the police arrested defendant Wu and seized the tools he possessed, including a self-made flat-head hex key, a hex key socket, a pair of scissors, and the stolen mobile phone. Later, the police returned the mobile phone to the victim Zhang and transferred the remaining seized items with the case. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Wu and Liang during the trial. The evidence includes the physical evidence of the self-made flat-head hex key, a hex key socket, a pair of scissors, household registration documents, criminal judgment, release certificate, records of arrest, seizure records, list of seized items, list of returned items, list of items transferred with the case, administrative penalty decision, Zhaoqing Rongxing Vehicle Trading receipt, Longyue Communication quality guarantee sheet, invoices, photocopies of vehicle licenses, explanatory materials, property value appraisal conclusion, identification records, on-site identification photos, on-site inspection records, site drawings, photos, witness testimony from Zhang, statements from victims Huang and Zhang, confessions and defenses of defendants Wu and Liang, as well as audiovisual materials sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in a certain province charges: On the afternoon of April 23, 2012, defendants Wang and Yang carried two nets to a mountain by Du Lake in a certain village in a certain town of a certain city. They illegally captured five wild birds using the method of netting. They were apprehended on the spot by police officers at around 18:00 on the same day. According to an appraisal, among the wild birds, there were three Hwamei birds and two Spotted Doves, all classified as generally protected wild animals in the province. After the defendants Wang and Yang were brought to the case, they truthfully confessed their crimes. During the court trial, the defendants Wang and Yang did not dispute the above facts, which are confirmed by evidence including the technical appraisal document of the case regarding the illegal hunting of terrestrial wild animals, the announcement from the Provincial Forestry Department prohibiting the hunting and trading of wild birds, the notice from the Ningbo Forestry Bureau and Public Security Bureau regulating and standardizing the hunting (prohibition) period times in the city, the list and photos of seized items, identification records and photos, the process of capture, and the identification of the defendants Wang and Yang. All of these are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Yang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on March 11, 2016, at around 1 a.m., defendants Yang and Ma, among others, were drinking at the City Space Bar in Beitun, Xinjiang. In order to make new friends, the victim, Zhao, who was also playing at the bar, proactively approached the defendants' booth to propose a toast and drank with them. At around 2 a.m. on the same day, the victim left the bar intending to take a taxi home. The two defendants followed to the section of the road in front of the bar, where they pulled and assaulted the victim, dragging him to the corner on the south side of Building 9 in Jiaxin Community, and the northwest side of Shiyihao Mansion in Beitun City. There, they assaulted him again, robbing him of a Huawei KIW-TLOOH model phone and 100 yuan in cash. According to the forensic report, the victim sustained a nasal bone fracture due to external trauma, with the degree of injury classified as minor. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecut", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It was further found that after the incident, the public security authorities confiscated stolen money amounting to 700 RMB from Yang A, Zou, and Hu. During the trial of this court, the defendants, Yang and Du, each returned stolen money amounting to 773.5 RMB, which was fully refunded to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang and Du during the court hearing. Additionally, evidence was provided by the victim Jiang's statement record, the confessions of accomplices Yang A, Wang A, and others, the testimony record of the witness Wang, search records, identification records and photos, the price authentication conclusion document No. 0159 by the Jintan City Price Certification Center, this court's criminal judgment document No. (2014) Tan Xing Er Chu Zi 0146, and the capture process provided by the police officers Yin and Xu from the Chengdong Police Station of Jintan City Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Fine"], "Du": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on August 9, 2013, at around 11:00 PM, Li (already sentenced) became disgruntled due to being neglected by a waiter at the Crazy Barbecue Restaurant on Huanghai Fourth Road in a certain city. Consequently, he called and gathered Feng (already sentenced), the defendants Tang, Chen, and others, and they successively went to the entrance of the Crazy Barbecue Restaurant. Without cause, they assaulted Zhang, Huang Bing, and others, resulting in minor injuries to Zhang, Huang Bing, Li, and Huang Yi, and causing minor injuries to Huang Jia.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location has accused Jing and Sha of the following: On the afternoon of March 30, 2016, the defendants Jing and Sha went to the XXX-XXX Shop in Zhengyang Building, Yushan Town, Kunshan City. Sha acted as the lookout while Jing stole a brown wallet (valued at 20 RMB) and more than 7,000 RMB in cash from a drawer belonging to the victim, An. After being brought to justice, Sha truthfully confessed to the criminal acts.", "label": {"Jing": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sha": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on about December 25, 2012, defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng, after prior consultation, conspired to defraud money by falsely reporting weight. Defendants Li and Gu transported PVC mesh scrap to the weighbridge operated by defendant Cheng to weigh the material. Defendant Cheng was responsible for falsely increasing the initial weight on the weighbridge and issuing the weight slip. Li and Gu promised Cheng a reward of 150 yuan for every 100 kilograms of weight falsely added. Subsequently, Li and Gu took the falsified weight data sheet of the PVC mesh scrap to a certain company in a certain city and sold the PVC mesh scrap to the company at a price of 3.6 yuan per kilogram, thereby defrauding the company of money. By the end of January 2013, Li, Gu, and Cheng had, through the above method, falsely sold 2,245 kilograms of scrap PVC mesh to the company in a certain city, which was assessed to be valued at 8,082 yuan. On March 12, 2014, defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng returned 8,082 yuan to the court. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the arrest process, evidence preservation list, copies of receipts, explanatory notes, household registration certificates, statements from the victim Huang, confessions from defendants Li, Gu, and Cheng, appraisal opinions, on-site identification records and photographs, and the Zhejiang Province court litigation fee invoice, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From June to August 2015, the defendant Lin, after consulting with the defendant Yang, received funds and virtual accounts and trading software provided by Yang. Lin was responsible for management and operations, illegally setting up four locations for a certain place certain place 300-stock futures trading bar in the district. The two concealed the use of virtual trading boards and lack of fund flow, attracting individuals like Lu, Wang1, Li22, Yang2, Qin, and others to participate in trading. They profited by collecting fees and transaction charges, with the income being shared between Lin and Yang. As of the incident, the total identifiable transaction amount was 1,230,900 yuan. Upon verification, neither defendant Yang nor Lin opened a futures account with Changjiang Securities Co., Ltd., nor did they register a business in the city. On February 25, 2016, defendant Lin voluntarily came forward and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts. After the incident, defendants Yang and Lin jointly compensated Lu and others with a loss amount of 700,000 yuan, receiving understanding from them. The above facts were substantiated by the prosecution through evidence including the defendants' confessions and defenses, victim statements, witness testimonies, identifications and recognitions, bank transaction flows, stock index bar partnership agreements, receipts and transfer records, transaction records, proof from Jinchang City Administration for Industry and Commerce, feedback from Changjiang Securities Co., Ltd., electronic evidence inspection records, seizure decision, seizure transcripts, seizure inventory and photos, letter of understanding, criminal judgment, release certificate, account arrival process, and explanatory notes.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 23:00 on April 22, 2013, Cheng and defendants Jia, Qiu, and Yang, along with others, were singing at Jule Fort KTV located in Yuhai Street, Rui'an City. During this time, because the karaoke hostess Li did not want Cheng to touch her body, she pushed Cheng. Cheng then threw a beer bottle at Li and slapped her. The altercation was eventually stopped by others. Subsequently, Li contacted her sister Li A by phone from the private room, saying that she had been beaten. Li A called her husband Zheng and instructed him to go to the KTV to inquire about the situation. Later, Li exited the KTV private room and encountered Zheng. Simultaneously, Cheng and defendants Jia A, among others, believed that Li had called for people to come for a fight, so they followed Li out of the private room. Outside the room, they confronted Zheng, and Cheng and defendant Jia A immediately began to beat Zheng and Li. Zheng fled to the bathroom in the KTV. Subsequently, Cheng again slapped Li several times and used a mop to beat her, while defendant Jia A also punched and kicked Li. During this time, defendant Qiu pulled Zheng out of the bathroom and punched and kicked him. Cheng, together with defendants Yang, Jia A, and others, went forward to jointly beat Zheng, causing him injuries. According to the appraisal, the primary injuries sustained by the victim Zheng include fractures of the left side ribs 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and contusions to the chest and right abdom", "label": {"Jia": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: Between June and December 2019, the defendant Yang committed theft of electric bicycle and electric tricycle batteries in multiple residential areas such as Binhe Garden and Dongfang Xiushuiyuan in a certain county. Based on the defendant Yang's confession and on-site identification, it has been verified that the batteries of electric vehicles owned by 30 individuals, including Wang, were stolen. According to the price authentication center of a certain county, the stolen batteries of the electric vehicles belonging to 30 individuals, including Wang, were valued at 7,256 yuan. Yang sold all the stolen batteries to the \"certain county's certain scrap recycling station\" operated by the defendants Xu and Hu. Despite knowing the batteries were stolen, defendants Xu and Hu purchased them at the price of used batteries. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented and read out evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Li and Wang, the statements of the victims including Wang, the on-site identification records and photographs, the pricing assessment conclusion, plea and penalty statement, criminal judgment, household registration certificate, and the confessions of the defendants Yang, Xu, and Hu.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic Development Zone accused: Defendant Zhao, without permission from the tobacco administration department, from November 2013 to March 21, 2014, used the long-distance bus he operated to purchase 62 cartons of Zhonghua brand hard-pack cigarettes and 39 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua brand cigarettes from various tobacco stores in a city and sold them at a markup in another city in another province. On March 21, 2014, he was caught on the spot transporting Zhonghua cigarettes with the intent to sell them in the other city, and 48 cartons of hard-pack and 32 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes were seized. The total value of the cigarettes involved was RMB 90,150. Defendant Yue, without permission from the tobacco administration department, from November 2013 to the Lantern Festival of 2014, purchased 33 cartons of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes and 17 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes from various tobacco stores in a city on four occasions and sold them at a markup to defendant Zhao. On March 21, 2014, defendants Yue and Zhao purchased 47 cartons of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes and 34 cartons of soft-pack Zhonghua cigarettes near the \"Dingdong Supermarket\" by the Grand Theater in a city, earning an introduction fee of RMB 3 per carton. The total value of the cigarettes involved was RMB 65,150. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Ding, Ji, Zhang, and Gao, a list of items seized, inspection reports, identification records, the process of the arrest, and confessions from defendants Zhao and Yue.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found: On the evening of January 27, 2016, Liu drove a motor vehicle after drinking and was caught by the police, after which his blood was drawn. At about 8 a.m. on January 28, 2016, the defendant Lin, in cooperation with Liu, went to the Fujian Minxi Judicial Appraisal Institute where the defendant Ke was employed. The three of them worked together to swap Liu's blood sample, which had been sent to the appraisal institute by the Traffic Police Brigade of Xinluo Branch Bureau of Longyan Public Security Bureau for appraisal, leading to the institute detecting an ethanol content of 3.58mg/100ml in Liu's blood. On the evening of January 28, 2016, the defendant Lin led the police to recover the blood sample of Liu, which had been swapped by Lin and others. On January 29, 2016, the police notified the defendants Ke and Lin by telephone to come forward for investigation. According to the appraisal by Fujian Wanhong Judicial Appraisal Institute, the ethanol concentration in Liu's blood was 139.29mg/100ml. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Ke and Lin or their defense during the trial. These facts were confirmed by evidence such as the defendants Ke and Lin's household registration certificates, proofs of no prior criminal record, the explanation of the incident and its circumstances, testimonies of witnesses Liu, Lai, Deng, Liu, Zeng, Li, Xie, call logs, photo identifications, recognition records, the inspection reports issued by Fujian Minxi Judicial Appraisal Institute and Fujian Wanhong Judicial Appraisal Institute, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ke and Lin.", "label": {"Ke": ["Detention"], "Lin": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a Miao Autonomous County charged that on March 28, 2016, the defendants Ma, Tao, and Wang invited each other, with Tao driving a cloud GSK2** van. The three of them traveled together from a certain city and town to a certain county. That night, they found a hotel to stay in within the county town and discussed plans to steal motorcycles the next day during the local market day. Around 10 a.m. on March 29 (Tuesday), the three drove from the county town to a rural area. After scouting the streets, defendant Tao parked the car at the corner of the intersection of Chaibai Village and got out to stand watch, Wang stayed in the car to stand watch, while Ma walked about 50 meters toward the Renzi Bridge direction to the side of the road and stole a red Jinghong brand three-wheeled motorcycle (frame number: LZXHDNZ14E5442704, engine number: E5409051, unlicensed) parked there by the victim, Yang. He then hid it at the Jinchanghe Hydropower Station. The three of them hid on the mountain opposite the station to observe and found that the owner discovered the motorcycle. They then descended the mountain and fled in the cloud GSK2** van, but were caught by the police. According to the assessment, the stolen three-wheeled motorcycle belonging to the victim Yang was valued at 13,300 RMB. In response to the above charges, the prosecution read and presented relevant evidence in court. Consequently,", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Yuhang District People's Procuratorate of a certain city accuses: Defendant Zhou is an employee in the machinery repair team of a company known as Certain State Products Co., Ltd. (abbreviated as Certain Company), and Defendant Wu is the team leader of the machinery repair team of the same company. Certain Company has explicit regulations that when performing welding in workshops containing flammable and explosive materials, there must be one person monitoring nearby, and operations can only proceed after implementing stringent safety measures. At around 15:00 on January 12, 2020, Defendants Zhou and Wu were repairing the No. 3 automatic foam molding machine in Certain Company's automatic foam production workshop. During this period, Zhou used an electric welder for operations, while Wu, as the fire safety officer, provided safety protection for the welding process nearby. Due to the failure of Defendants Zhou and Wu to remove flammable foam plastics to a safe distance from the welding area, the sparks generated during welding caused the foam plastics to catch fire, resulting in a fire that destroyed Certain Company's factory building, foam molding machine, fully automatic intermittent pre-expansion machine, trucks, cardboard boxes, and more. According to the appraisal, the value of the destroyed property totaled RMB 2,251,462.5. After the incident, Defendants Zhou and Wu were granted forgiveness by the victim unit, Certain Company.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Qingshan District in a certain city, Hubei Province charged that on the morning of May 22, 2013, at around 7 a.m., defendants You and Zhang, after conspiring, stole the wallet of the victim Zheng while he was buying vegetables and was unprepared at the Qingyiju Community market in Gongren Village Street, Qingshan District, a certain city. Defendant You pickpocketed the wallet and defendant Zhang aided the transfer, stealing 1,500 yuan in cash from it. Subsequently, defendant You received 900 yuan, and defendant Zhang received 600 yuan. On August 20 and September 16, 2013, due to drug use, defendants Zhang and You were sent by the public security agency to the city's Public Security Bureau Drug Rehabilitation Center for compulsory rehabilitation. After the public security agency obtained leads on defendant You's suspected theft, they interrogated defendant You on November 20, 2013, during which he confessed to the facts of pickpocketing together with defendant Zhang. After the case was filed, defendant Zhang's family returned the stolen 1,500 yuan which was returned to the victim Zheng. These facts were not disputed by defendants You and Zhang during the trial. In addition, the case is supported by evidence including the public security agency's case solving, arrival process and case handling instructions, the China Construction Bank ATM customer receipt, the list of seized and returned items, the criminal judgment No. 236 issued in 2011 by this court, the defendants' identity materials, the testimony of witness Lü, the victim Zheng’s report and statements, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"You": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Nanshan District in a certain city charged: On June 20, 2015, at around 21:00, Wu Moushan, Ge Mouzheng, Zhou Mouli, Wang Mouyong (the aforementioned four have been sentenced), Wang Mouyan, and the defendants Sun and Zhou, among others, were having a meal at a wooden barbecue restaurant on Dongbin Road, Nanshan District, in a certain city. At around midnight the following day, Zhou, while going to the restroom at the barbecue restaurant, unintentionally had the door pushed by the victim Chen Moujia. After Wu Moushan learned of this, he turned and shoved Chen Moujia, and then Ge Mouzheng, seeing this, picked up barbecue skewers from the table along with Wu Moushan to hit Chen Moujia. The victim Chen Mouyi intervened to mediate, and both parties were eventually stopped. Subsequently, when both parties were preparing to leave, another dispute occurred. Wu Moushan, Ge Mouzheng, Zhou Mouli, Wang Mouyong, Wang Mouyan, Sun, and Zhou, among others, punched and kick", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention"], "Zhou": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around midnight on September 24, 2015, after conspiring together, the defendants Huang and Lan drove a van to the cattle pen at Pan's home in a certain county's development area in a certain township. They stole a yellow cow that Long was raising there. Around noon, the two defendants were caught by the police while attempting to sell the cow in a certain city's town. The stolen yellow cow and the van used in the crime were seized on the spot. The seized cow has been returned to the victim Long. According to the valuation by the county's price certification center, the stolen yellow cow was valued at RMB 6,750. During the trial, defendants Huang and Lan raised no objections to the above facts. Additionally, evidence includes photos of the stolen yellow cow and the van used in the crime; documentary evidence including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, identities of the two defendants, details of the arrest, lists of seized and returned items; the victim Long's statement; the defendants Huang and Lan’s confessions and defenses; expert opinions; inspection and identification records, among other evidence. All the above evidence was presented and cross-examined during the trial, with sources being legally obtained, objectively reflecting the facts, and sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at around 3 AM on August 22, 2014, the victim, Yang, had a dispute with a \"Mingzun KTV\" waiter over a payment issue at Tong'an Street in a certain city. Security personnel from \"Mingzun KTV,\" including defendants Chen, Ji, and Wang, arrived upon hearing the commotion. Defendant Chen used a walkie-talkie to assault Yang, and defendants Ji and Wang also assaulted Yang, resulting in multiple injuries to Yang's head and face. According to a forensic evaluation: Yang has a clear history of external injuries, with scars on his head and face totaling 12 centimeters in length, of which head scalp scars total 10 centimeters; the injury is classified as minor injury level two. On October 20, 2014, defendants Chen, Ji, and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to their criminal actions. The parties have now reached a settlement agreement, with defendant Chen compensating Yang for economic losses in the amount of 30,000 RMB and obtaining Yang's forgiveness.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on April 1, 2018, at around 3:00 PM, Cao (handled in a separate case) was dissatisfied with the victim, Huang, for his rude remarks while drunk at noon on the same day. Cao then instructed Lu, Zhang 1, Gao 1, and Wang 1 (all four handled in separate cases) to drive Huang from the south gate of a mountain scenic area in a certain county to the Jining Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., Ltd., which he managed. In the company's second-floor office, Zhang 1, Gao 1, Wang 1, and Lu assaulted Huang. At about 5:00 PM that day, after Cao arrived at Jining Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., he instructed Zhu to pour water on Huang's head. Subsequently, Zhu and others assaulted Huang. During the beating, due to issues such as Huang falsely reporting expenses to the company, Cao and others summoned the defendant Han and others back to Hongfeng Automobile Trade Co., Ltd. After Han returned to the company, he assaulted Huang. Until around 9:00 PM that day, Cao and others took Huang back to a certain county and let him go. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Office of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, Huang's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. In response to the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including documentary evidence of the capture process, testimonies of witnesses such as Li 1, statements of the victim Huang, confessions and defenses of the defendant", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Ouhai District in a certain city charged that on October 9, 2013, at around 7 a.m., the defendants Shi and Lin, together with Li (to be handled in a separate case) and others, conspired and went to the bus stop next to No. 25 Xishan East Road, Jingshan Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city. Shi and Lin acted as lookouts while Li stole a mobile phone (worth 2,800 yuan) from the pants pocket of the victim, Li. The stolen phone was later sold for 1,600 yuan. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Shi and Lin during the court trial, and there is also the victim Li's statement, witness Li's testimony, a price appraisal report, a situation statement, a criminal judgment, a certificate of release after serving a sentence, an account of the arrest, identification materials, and surveillance footage as evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendants, Wang and Han, are married. From May to June 2016, the defendants Wang and Han, despite knowing that poppy leaves are toxic, harmful, and non-food materials that should not be added to food, still used poppy leaves during the preparation of brined geese at home at No. 157, Zone C, Galaxy Community, a town in a certain district of a city. Wang was responsible for the preparation, and both Wang and Han sold the brined geese containing poppy ingredients at stalls they set up in the Sunshine Community of the development zone in a certain city and on the streets of a certain town in a certain district. According to identification, the brine used on the brined geese at their stalls, the brine used during preparation in their workshop, and the suspicious plant leaves all contained poppy components. During this period, they sold more than 200 brined geese containing poppy ingredients. After the case was uncovered, Wang and Han truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Further investigation revealed that the public security organs legally seized 9.35 kilograms of brine containing poppy ingredients and 0.04 kilograms of poppy leaves from the defendants Wang and Han. The aforementioned criminal facts were not contested by Wang and Han during the trial proceedings. The facts are substantiated by evidence, including basic information on permanent residents, the arrest process, seizure lists presented and cross-examined in court, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Wang and Han, the forensic identification report from the Judicial Identification Institute of Yangzhou University, the on-site records, search records, extraction records, weighing records, and related photos produced by the development zone branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On May 25, 2017, the defendant Wang, together with Zhang (already prosecuted), drove a semi-trailer with license plate B××××× to transport steel during which, in collusion with Zhang3 (already prosecuted) and others, they transported the steel to warehouse No. 2 of Hangzhou xx Company, rented by Zhang3, located in Tangqi Town, a certain district in a certain city. In this warehouse, the defendant Zhou, together with Li, Liu, and Zhang4 (all already prosecuted), used a crane to unload coiled rebar, disassembled and dispersed it, thereby stealing 11.772 tons of coiled rebar, valued at 44,145 yuan. The evidence supporting the charges includes physical and documentary evidence like rebar (photos), household registration certificates; witness testimonies; confessions and defenses of the defendants; price appraisal conclusion documents; on-site investigation records, person identification records; surveillance footage (on CD), etc.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xiaodian District, a certain city, charged that around 8 PM on August 23, 2015, defendants Li and Liu went to the vicinity of Wuyi Square in a certain city. Seeing the victim, Song, carrying a backpack, they followed him onto Bus No. 4. On the bus, with Liu providing cover, Li stole a white VIVO Y613F mobile phone from Song's backpack. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 567 RMB. The stolen property has been returned to Song. On August 26, 2015, at approximately 3 PM, defendants Li and Liu went to the bus stop at the intersection of Changfeng Street and Xinchengmo'er Road in Xiaodian District of a certain city. While the victim, Yu, was boarding the bus, Liu provided cover by squeezing into the bus, giving Li the opportunity to reach into Yu's bag and steal a wallet containing over 1,900 RMB in cash. After boarding, Yu was informed by others that the contents of the bag had been stolen, so Yu got off the bus to chase after them. Along the way, Yu recovered the wallet that Li discarded while fleeing, and Li was subsequently apprehended by patrolling police officers. These facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Liu during the trial. Furthermore, they are corroborated by the victim's report and statement, records of the arrest, identification records, witness testimonies, a price appraisal report, photographs of the defendants identifying stolen goods, a list of seized and returned items, the decisions on compulsory detoxification and administrative penalties, the confessions of the two defendants, and their registered resident information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Yingze District of a certain city charges that around 7:40 am on June 30, 2015, the defendant Zhang, in collusion with the defendant Li, stole a red DOOV S1 model mobile phone (valued at 200 RMB) from the backpack of the victim Chen on the No. 103 bus in a certain city. At around 11:00 am on the same day, the defendant Zhang, again in collusion with the defendant Li, stole a wallet from the backpack of the victim Liu on the No. 870 bus in the same city. The wallet contained 28 RMB, the victim's ID card, and a bank card (with a pin code). Both were caught on the spot afterward. Following the incident, the stolen money and items were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Li during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Chen's and Liu's reports and interview records, as well as by the testimony of a witness Geng, who stated that the police caught the pickpocket on the 870 bus. Other supporting evidence includes identification records, arrest materials, photos of the recovered money and items, seizure and return lists, records of previous convictions and checklists for bad behavior, item price evaluation reports, household registration information, basic condition survey forms, and confessions from the defendants Zhang and Li. The evidence corroborates each other sufficiently to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: In November 2010, the defendant Zhao registered the establishment of Lianyungang Fuzhi Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Fuzhi Company) in a certain district of a certain city. Afterwards, the defendant Zhao served as the company's general manager, and the defendant Qin served as the company's deputy general manager. In 2011, despite knowing that they lacked the ability to repay debts, defendants Zhao and Qin, along with others, established a store at No. 47 Xingfu South Road in a certain district of a certain city under the name of Fuzhi Company. Defendant Qin acted as the store's head and accountant. The two used promotional information such as low-risk high returns, high interest on deposits, and claims of company strength to lure funds from the general public. From June 2012 to April 2013, defendants Zhao and Qin borrowed money under the name of Fuzhi Company, attracting a total of over 1.8 million RMB from 39 individuals for personal consumption, debt repayment, external loans, etc. As of the time the case was uncovered, more than 1.7 million RMB remained unpaid. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution has submitted related documentation, witness testimonies, victim statements, and the defendants' confessions and defenses as evidence to the court.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Furong District, a certain city, charged that: In early July 2014, the defendant Deng met the female victim Li through QQ chat. After chatting online, they arranged to meet on July 10, 2014. Subsequently, the two opened a room at the Yahua Grand Hotel on Bayi Road in Furong District of a certain city and had relations. On July 30, 2014, the defendant Deng, in agreement with the defendant Lei, planned to extort the victim Li, with an agreement that the proceeds would be shared between them. Deng then contacted the victim Li via SMS, threatening to disclose their relationship to her husband and to post ads in her residential area to ruin her reputation, demanding that victim Li transfer 10,000 RMB to Lei's bank account. On August 4, 2014, the victim Li arranged to meet Deng to make the payment and called the police. At around 19:00 that day, after victim Li handed over the agreed 5600 RMB to Deng and Lei at the entrance of Pudong Development Bank on Wanbao Avenue in a certain city, the police promptly arrested Deng and Lei, seizing 5600 RMB extorted by Deng and two iron rods they were carrying. During the trial, defendants Deng and Lei did not dispute the aforementioned facts. Defense lawyers You and Zhou argued that the extortion of 5600 RMB by Deng and Lei was conducted under police surveillance and therefore should be considered an attempted crime; Deng and Lei were both first-time offenders, confessed truthfully after being apprehended, and Lei was an accessory, requesting leniency in punishment. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence including the statement of victim Li, the case registration form from Xianghu Police Station of Furong Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, source and arrest procedure materials, seizure procedure materials, seizure decision, list of seized items, list of returned items, photos of seized items, SMS records, the confessions of defendants Deng and Lei, and their household registration certificates and character evidence, which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Li violated relevant national regulations by providing a total of 60,251 pieces of citizens' personal information, including phone numbers, to the defendant Shi on March 4, March 14, 2017, and February 28, 2018. The defendant Shi violated national regulations by providing a total of 28,816 pieces of citizens' personal information, including phone numbers, to Cao (handled in a separate case) on July 13, 2017. Defendant Li was apprehended on March 6, 2018, and defendant Shi was apprehended on April 3 of the same year. After being apprehended, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Li and Shi raised no objections to these facts, which were supported by documentary evidence such as the basic information of the habitual residence of defendants Li and Shi, the details of their apprehension, explanation of circumstances, seizure decision letters, lists of seized items, the testimony of witness Cao, the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Shi, criminal photographs, inspection records, electronic data inspection work records, search records, identification records, remote survey work records, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused that in the early hours of December 10, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Wu, along with others, were drinking at the New Concept Sichuan Restaurant in the big stall at No. 12 Shapu Commercial Street, Xintang Town, Zengcheng City. At around 4 a.m., after drinking, the defendants Zhang and Wu, without reason, smashed the tables, chairs, induction cookers, refrigerators, mini TVs, and other items in the store. The value of the damaged items was appraised at 3,352 RMB. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence to the court, including the victim's statements, on-site investigation records and photos, the price appraisal conclusion, and the defendants' confessions, to prove the facts of the accusation.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses: At around 5 am on April 4, 2015, defendants Pang and Wu were at the basketball court of Area 1 in Guangzhou City Construction Vocational College, where they got into a verbal altercation with the school security guard Huang, which escalated into a physical fight. During the altercation, Pang and Wu used a flashlight and punched and kicked the victim, Huang, causing him injuries. After evaluation, the victim Huang's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree.", "label": {"Pang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination and verification, it was found that at around 1 AM on December 22, 2015, the defendants Li and Li, together with a person nicknamed \"Death So-and-so,\" went to the front of \"New Fashion Internet Cafe\" at No. 87 Bubu Road, Wanxiu District, a certain city, and stole a Shuangjian SJ125T-2G motorcycle (valued at 3,008 RMB) parked there by the victim Gan. After their success, the three went to the front of \"New Gem Hotel\" at No. 28, the middle section of Xihuan Road, Wanxiu District, a certain city, and used a hex key to steal a Zhufeng ZF125T-16A moped (valued at 2,352 RMB) parked there by the victim Mo. After the crime, the public security organs seized the stolen Zhufeng ZF125T-16A moped and the hex key used as a crime tool, and have returned the vehicle to Mo. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the seizure list and return list, the unified invoice for motor vehicle sales, the vehicle purchase receipt, the account of the arrest, household registration certificates, the criminal and civil attached judgment, release certificate, search records, identification records and photos, the statements of victims Mo and Gan, the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Li, the testimony of witness Liang, and the price appraisal conclusion, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From March to August 2019, the defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu, for the purpose of making profits, created a friends circle on the Xianlai Mahjong gaming platform in a certain location. They each invited individuals to join the circle for gambling, which consisted of about 60 members. Defendant Liu was responsible for recharging the room fees on the gaming platform, with each room card costing 3 yuan per game. The three defendants also downloaded the Xianliao chat tool and established a chat group called \"New Group, Post Your Scores Here.\" Participants in the gambling games would open a room within the friends circle, share the link in the chat group, and enter the mahjong game, each starting with a base score of 1000 points, at a rate of 10 yuan per point. After each game, the platform would automatically calculate wins and losses, and the biggest winner would post the results in the chat group. Participants would settle gambling debts through WeChat or Alipay transfers. The biggest winner would pay the room fee to the three defendants via WeChat, with a 10 yuan fee for winning less than 200 points and a 20 yuan fee for winning more than 200 points. Upon retrieving the transaction records from the defendants' WeChat accounts for room fees, it was found that the three defendants collected a total of 30,880 yuan. Defendants Ye and Yu voluntarily turned themselves in on September 4 and December 11, 2019, respectively, and confessed their criminal activities truthfully. The three defendants also voluntarily returned 35,000 yuan of illegal funds after being apprehended. The facts stated above are supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution: 1. Case registration forms, arrest records, work descriptions, detailed WeChat transaction lists, and non-tax revenue receipts; 2. Testimonies of witnesses You, Xie, and another Yu; 3. Confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu; 4. Identification records; 5. An electronic data CD containing WeChat transaction details of defendants Liu, Ye, and Yu.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of June 17, 2014, defendants Ding and Wang conspired to steal 16 zinc ingots, valued at a total of 5,931 RMB, from Workshop No. 1 of Zhejiang Hangfeng Iron Tower Co., Ltd. in Linjiang Subdistrict, Xiaoshan District, a certain city. Defendant Wang was apprehended by the public security bureau outside the factory premises. On January 12, 2015, defendant Ding turned himself in to the public security bureau and truthfully confessed to his theft. After being brought to justice, defendant Wang also truthfully confessed to his theft. After the incident, the stolen goods involved were all recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Yang, and Chen, as well as records of identification, inspection notes, evidence retrieval lists, photographs, weighing records, labor contracts, call logs, power of attorney documents, lists of seized and returned items, price appraisal reports, the course of the incident, explanatory notes, and identity verification documents of defendants Ding and Wang, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged that during the period when defendant Gao served as the director of the Dongjie Village Committee in Wencheng Town, Wenshui County, and defendant Ren served as a village committee member, a village committee meeting was held to decide to transfer the funds from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account in Dongjie Village to a separate account managed by defendant Li. In March 2012, defendants Gao, Ren, and Li discussed using 1 million yuan from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account for the registered capital verification of Wenshui County Zhongxiong Agricultural and Sideline Products Trading Co., Ltd., which they jointly established. On March 27 and 28, 2012, Ren and Li transferred the 1 million yuan from the account for this purpose. The amount was returned on May 24 of the same year. During the time Gao and Ren were serving as Director of the Town Committee and a member of the Dongjie Village Committee, from November to December 2012, they used the funds from the Dongxing Community Resettlement Building account to pay 285,516 yuan for the construction costs of a comprehensive building for an individual named Wu. This amount has not been returned to date.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a District in Wuhan City charges: On October 25, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, defendants Dai and Han were at the night market on Baocheng Road in a district of this city. Defendant Han acted as a lookout while defendant Dai took advantage of the victim, Feng, being unprepared to steal a wallet from Feng’s bag. The wallet was valued at 30 RMB and contained 1,720 RMB, bank cards, and other items. Subsequently, defendants Dai and Han were apprehended by the police. The stolen items have been recovered by public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged without objection by defendants Dai and Han during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the arrest process and case reports; the statement of the victim, Feng; testimonies from witnesses Liu, Wang, and Kong; the seizure decision, seizure record, seizure list, and return list; physical evidence photos; the price appraisal statement; the criminal judgment; the compulsory isolation detox decision; and defendant Dai’s confession, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On April 15, 2014, at around 20:00, the defendants Ou and Liu conspired in advance to ride a motorcycle to the old factory area of \"Zhejiang Weiyu Machinery Co., Ltd.\" on a certain street in a certain city. They used a bamboo ladder to climb over the wall into the factory and entered Workshop No. 3 through a window. They stole 57.44 kilograms of semi-finished copper pieces, 42.18 kilograms of semi-finished iron pieces, 3.1 kilograms of scrap purple copper wire, and 136 M691 copper quick connectors, with a total value of 4,000.56 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provided this court with the seizure decision, list of seized and returned items, weighing records, inventory records and photos, basic information on the permanent residents, the process of seizure, the victim Wang's statement, and the statements of the defendants Ou and Liu. It is considered that the defendants Ou and Liu, with the purpose of illegal possession, secretly stole other people's property in a relatively large amount and should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x. It is a joint crime. The court is requested to punish them in accordance with the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The defendants Ou and Liu have no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After examination of the evidence presented during the trial, it has been verified as true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged against defendants Ou and Liu by the prosecution.", "label": {"Ou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution's indictment alleges: On the evening of October 17, 2013, the defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai, along with Liang (to be handled in a separate case) and others, had a dispute with the victim Chen over a trivial matter near the Night Market City in Wukang Town, Deqing County. Subsequently, the defendant Dai came forward to help and, together with defendants Wang, Yu, and Liang, physically assaulted the victim Chen by punching and kicking him, resulting in fractures of his left eighth and ninth ribs, which were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai, along with others, compensated the victim Chen with a total of 28,000 RMB, and they all received the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang, Yu, and Dai during the court proceedings, and the evidence such as medical records, the settlement agreement, receipts, a letter of forgiveness, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, records of illegal activities, household registration certificates, population information, statements from the victim Chen, testimonies from witnesses Li A, Hou, Li B, confessions from co-defendant Liang, forensic medical assessment on the degree of human injuries, identification records, photos, the circumstances of the arrest, and explanatory statements, is sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charged: Starting from August 2015, defendants Zhong and Ling accepted multiple people's bets on \"Mark Six\" for organized gambling at the Hao Hui Duo Supermarket in Yashuitang, Daxiang Village, Renhe Town, Baiyun District, in this city. At around 8 p.m. on September 8 of the same year, Zhong and Ling were again involved in organized gambling at the aforementioned location when they were apprehended by law enforcement officers. They were found with 27 \"Mark Six\" betting slips and gambling funds amounting to 1,500 yuan. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution authority read and presented documents, witness testimonies, and the defendants' confessions as evidence during the court trial. Therefore,", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ling": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: At the end of December 2013, the defendant Tu, in a teahouse he operated and managed in Muzhuangqiao, a village in a certain town of Tongxiang City, organized and recruited gambling participants Zhu, Zhao, Zhang, and others four times to engage in group gambling by playing \"Tongzigong.\" He drew a profit of approximately 12,000 yuan from this. The defendant Li was responsible for keeping watch and received a total of over 800 yuan as a benefit.", "label": {"Tu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province charged that: between April 2016 and February 2019, the defendants Chen, Zhu, and Qian took advantage of their positions, which allowed them to sign contracts on behalf of a certain company, report payment plans, and be responsible for the construction at a certain project site. They used these positions at their office, located on Hongqi Avenue in a certain district's agricultural development zone in this city, to jointly or individually accept money from individuals such as Zou, Fan, and another Chen. Among them, defendant Chen was involved in accepting a total of 177,000 RMB and received a share of 72,000 RMB; defendant Zhu was involved in accepting a total of 170,000 RMB and received a share of 60,000 RMB; defendant Qian was involved in accepting a total of 161,000 RMB and received a share of 56,000 RMB. The illicit money obtained was spent by the three defendants. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read and presented in court documentary evidence such as the \"Payment Approval Forms,\" \"Project Visa Forms,\" \"Business Licenses,\" \"Labor Contracts,\" and \"Internal Contract Agreement,\" along with the testimonies of witnesses like Zhou and others, as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Qian": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: 1. In December 2015, the defendant Yao, in collaboration with Huang, went to Wujiadian, Datiewu Village, Hengjie Town, Yushan County, and stole a Lvjia brand electric bicycle parked at the home of the victim Zheng. The Lvjia brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,625 RMB. 2. In July 2015, the defendant Yao, in collaboration with Huang, went to a village in a certain town in Changshan County, a certain province, and stole a Nija brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Wang at the entrance of the Village and Town United Bank. They also stole a Luyuan brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Mao at the entrance of the Hongqi Gang Rural Credit Cooperative. The stolen Nija brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 1,710 RMB. 3. In the second half of 2015, the defendant Yao went to Mapeng, Houlong Village, Bingxi Town, Yushan County, and stole a Lvju brand electric bicycle. This Lvju brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 1,230 RMB. 4. On the night of March 15, 2016, the defendant Yao went to the construction site of the new party school in Yushan County and stole a Suqier brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Ke. The Suqier brand electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,510 RMB. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence including the confessions of the defendants Yao and Huang, statements from the victims Zheng, Ke, Wang, and Mao, testimonies of witnesses Huang (Witness 1), Yao (Witness 1), and Huang (Witness 2), identification of scene photos, appraisal reports, a list of seized items, inspection records, a situation report, a receipt from the Yushan County Public Security Bureau, criminal verdicts of prior offenses of the defendants Yao and Huang, and household registration information.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: On September 11, 2012, defendant Xia, together with Huang, invested in the establishment of Shandong Shangkong Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shangkong Real Estate) in a certain district. Xia invested 7 million yuan, and Huang invested 3 million yuan, with Xia serving as the legal representative. Later, to develop a plot in a certain district, defendant Xia, along with Wuxi Wuzhou International Decoration City Co., Ltd. and Huang, invested in the establishment of Wuzhou Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wuzhou Real Estate) in July 2013. Wuxi Wuzhou International Decoration City Co., Ltd. invested 15 million yuan, Xia invested 3 million yuan, and Huang invested 2 million yuan, with Xia serving as the general manager of the company.\n\nDuring his tenure as the general manager of Wuzhou Real Estate, defendant Xia, taking advantage of his control over the company's seal and other documents such as the company's bank signature retained on file, conspired with defendant Chen, who worked at the company, to conceal from other shareholders of Wuzhou Real Estate, forging a contract. On August 2, 2013, they unauthorizedly transferred 19.8 million yuan of registered capital from the company's account, under the guise of investment funds, into the account of Shangkong Real Estate, where Xia was the legal representative. On August 5 of the same year, they deposited the sum into four separate transactions into the personal bank account of Xia's wife, Qi Mouyun. The next day, 550,000 yuan was transferred to Huang's personal account to cover the project measurement fee that Huang had advanced.\n\nOn August 5 and 6 of the same year, Xia transferred the remaining 19.25 million yuan into his personal account and on August 6 instructed Chen to deposit 14 million yuan of it into Shandong Shangkong Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s account to process an increase in his personal share in the company. After the incident, all funds involved in the case were returned. For the above charges, the prosecution agency provided evidence including the confessions and defenses of defendants Xia and Chen, testimony from witness Shu and others, documentary evidence, and other supporting materials.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in a certain city charges: Starting in October 2013, defendants Liu and Lai rented and lived together in Room 2615, Building C, Sunshine New Line, Dongmen South Road, Luohu District, in a certain city. On January 13, 2014, defendant Liu provided drugs and allowed his friend Xu (who has been administratively punished) to use methamphetamine at his residence. Subsequently, defendant Liu continued to provide drugs multiple times and allowed Xu to use methamphetamine at that location. On the afternoon of February 21, 2014, defendants Liu, Lai, and drug user Xu were caught by the police at the aforementioned residence. The police seized a packet of methamphetamine on the spot (determined by evaluation to be 4.35 grams in net weight, containing methamphetamine). Further investigation revealed that defendant Lai allowed drug user Xu to use methamphetamine at their residence on February 13 and February 16, 2014. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: Photos of the seized drugs and drug paraphernalia; 2. Documentary evidence: List of seized items, call records, the arrest process, administrative punishment materials, and physical examination reports of the involved drug users, identity information and physical examination reports of the defendants; 3. Testimonies: Testimony of witness Xu; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: Confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Lai; 5. Expert opinions: \"Expert Report\" and \"Notice of Expert Conclusion\"; 6. Records of on-site inspection, investigation, identification, investigation experiments, etc.: On-site inspection records, photos, and identification transcripts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 4:00 p.m. on May 1, 2016, defendants Cai and Yang took an eastbound Route 19 AL59** bus. When the bus reached the vicinity of the Big Wild Goose Pagoda stop, Yang assisted Cai, and Cai stole a brown-black wallet from the shoulder bag of the victim, Zhu, which contained an ICBC bank card, an ID card, and 3,000 yuan in cash. Cai then transferred the wallet to Yang. Zhu discovered the theft and immediately caught Cai. Yang took the opportunity to throw the wallet into the trash bin by the rear door of the bus and fled but was captured on the spot by Zhu's boyfriend, Weng, who reported the incident to the police. The police arrived and apprehended Cai and Yang. The stolen wallet was delivered to the public security bureau that evening by bus driver Yi A, and all items except the cash were recovered and returned to the victim, Zhu. The evidence confirming the above facts includes: 1. The report materials and statements from the victim, Zhu; 2. The documentation from the public security authorities regarding the capture of defendants Cai and Yang; 3. Testimonies from witnesses Weng and Yi; 4. Photos of the location where the victim's wallet was discarded; 5. The record and photos of the victim Zhu identifying defendant Cai and the stolen wallet; 6. Photos of defendants Cai and Yang identifying the crime scene and recognizing the stolen wallet; 7. The receipt issued to the victim Zhu for retrieving the stolen items; 8. A sketch of the theft scene; 9. The forensic clinical judicial appraisal report from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University; 10. Confessions from defendants Cai and Yang. The aforementioned evidence was cross-examined and authenticated in court, and it was determined to be true, sufficient, and mutually corroborative, enough to substantiate the verdict.", "label": {"Cai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain city's district People's Procuratorate charges: During the production process, Company X Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Company X) generates hazardous waste such as oily sludge and paint residues. According to proper disposal procedures, this hazardous waste should be approved by environmental protection authorities and disposed of by companies with the necessary hazardous waste disposal qualifications. Defendant Rong, the deputy general manager of Company X, was responsible for hazardous waste disposal operations. In July 2016, during the process of handling the aforementioned hazardous waste, Defendant Rong instructed Defendant Hu to contact disposal companies. Due to the high costs and long cycles associated with certified companies, Defendants Rong and Hu handed over 8.6 tons of hazardous waste to Defendant Yang, who lacked proper disposal qualifications, for a price of 36,000 RMB. Subsequently, Defendant Yang contacted Defendant Wang, who in turn contacted Defendants Zhou and Gao. On July 11th of the same year, Defendants Wang and Zhou drove a large truck with license plate \"X-D×××××\" to transport the 8.6 tons of hazardous waste from Company X's plant in the district of a certain city to near the residence rented by Defendant Gao on Cangqian Street, in a district of a certain city in a certain province. Defendant Gao, together with Liu and another Wang (both dealt with in separate cases), discussed and then Wang contacted Yao (handled in a separate case), who further contacted Zheng (handled in a separate case) to drive a farm vehicle with license plate \"Wan 10180**\" to transport the hazardous waste, and arranged for Xiang (handled in a separate case) to lead the way. Subsequently, Defendants Wang, Zhou, Gao, together with Liu, Wang, Zheng, and Xiang, illegally dumped the 8.6 tons of hazardous waste in two sessions in a certain district of a certain city. The evidence supporting these charges includes witness testimonies; household registration certificates, business licenses, photos, industrial waste disposal agreements, financial records, special VAT invoices, and other documentary evidence; on-site inspection records, identification records; recognition of the hazardous waste, explanations regarding the hazardous waste; and confessions and defenses from the defendants and co-defendants.", "label": {"Rong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges that, on November 5, 2016, at approximately 19:10, defendant Hu was unloading cargo at the entrance of the xx express delivery warehouse in this district when he had a dispute with his colleague Yang over trivial work matters, which led to a physical altercation. Colleague Chen stepped in to break up the fight but also got into a conflict with Yang. Subsequently, defendants Hu and Chen together assaulted victim Yang, knocking Yang to the ground and causing injuries to his head and face. According to the appraisal, victim Yang suffered fractures on the left maxillary frontal process, left nasal bone, and left nasomaxillary suture, classified as minor injuries of the second degree; these injuries were consistent with those caused by this incident. On December 23, 2016, defendants Hu and Chen received a phone notification from police officers and voluntarily went to the police station to undergo processing. On the same day, both defendants reached a criminal reconciliation with victim Yang, compensating Yang with 60,000 RMB and obtaining his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Yang's statement, original external injury record form and injury photographs, forensic appraisal of the degree of bodily injury, clinical imaging consultation report by Wenzhou Medical University Forensic Identification Center, case closure statement, criminal reconciliation document, letter of forgiveness, receipt, population information, statements of defendants Hu and Chen during the investigation phase, and the identification site records, all of which sufficiently support the determination.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention"], "Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that defendants Zhang and Li, on November 5, 2014, at around midnight, at Juyuanwang Hotel, Zhanqian Street, Lianshan District, a certain city, for the purpose of profit, introduced prostitutes Liu and Ma for prostitution and were caught on the spot by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the trial, and are confirmed by evidence materials on record, such as witness testimonies, identification transcripts, call records, and criminal judgment documents, which, after being presented and cross-examined in court, are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that: 1. On May 9, 2009, Lin rented a black Passat car (valued at 70,000 RMB) with the license plate J××××× from Ding. Later, Lin wanted to mortgage the car to obtain a loan and, through Zhang and Dai, contacted Lai, who was willing to accept the mortgage. On May 11, 2009, defendant Lai, knowing that the black Passat with license plate J××××× did not belong to Lin, accepted the car as a mortgage, loaned 50,000 RMB to Lin, and gained an interest of 5,000 RMB from it. The car has now been recovered and returned to the victim. 2. On May 27, 2009, Lin, through Li’s intervention, rented a Hyundai Elantra (valued at 65,000 RMB) with license plate J××××× from Wang. On the same day, Lin, through Zhang, contacted Chen, who was willing to accept the mortgage. On the same day, defendant Chen, knowing the car did not belong to Lin, accepted the mortgage and loaned 50,000 RMB to Lin, gaining an interest of 2,500 RMB from it. Later, the car was redeemed by the victim Wang and others. On March 22, 2011, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the police and confessed the criminal facts truthfully. It was also found that defendants Lai and Chen have returned their illegal gains. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Lai and Chen during the trial and are corroborated by the confessions of the co-defendants Lin and Zhang, statements of the victims Ding and Wang, testimonies of witnesses Li and Dai, as well as lists of seized and returned items and photographs, vehicle identification and photographs, IOUs, car rental contracts, car rental agreements, price appraisal reports, account records, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Lai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in the early hours of November 13, 2009, the defendants Zhang, Shao, and Wang, after premeditation, went to the mink farm of the victim, Mr. Zhang, located in a certain village in a certain district of a certain city. The three used a method of mixing \"Rat Poison Strong\" with small fish to poison the minks, stealing 160 male minks and 80 female minks from the farm, valued at 60,000 RMB. Defendant Zhang transported the stolen dead minks back to a certain city to sell the stolen goods, and gave Shao and Wang each 3,000 RMB. After the incident, defendants Shao and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendants Shao and Wang subsequently reached a compensation agreement with the victim, Mr. Zhang, collectively compensating him a total of 65,000 RMB. Mr. Zhang expressed forgiveness to defendants Shao and Wang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang, Shao, and Wang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim, Mr. Zhang, testimony from witnesses Mr. Li and Mr. Xie, records of the police officers' statements on capturing and bringing in the defendants, criminal case settlement agreements, receipts, letters of forgiveness, the price appraisal conclusion issued by the Price Certification Center of a certain city, the physicochemical test report from the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of a certain city, on-site inspection records, identification records and photos, the (2008) Yong Lun Criminal First Instance No. 318 Criminal Judgment, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that between May 20, 2020, and May 29, 2020, a resident of a certain district in a certain city, Wang, was defrauded by others using the \"Momo\" dating app and QQ chat software under the pretense of dating. The fraud involved convincing Wang to invest in \"Ether\" virtual currency on the \"Huili Exchange\" investment platform, transferring a total of 1,169,400 RMB to the \"recharge\" account. On May 29, 2020, Cheng (handled in a separate case), knowing that the funds quickly transferred and withdrawn by Xiao (handled in a separate case) were criminal proceeds, still provided bank cards and Alipay accounts under the names Li and Gao to receive the funds. Cheng then assisted in quickly transferring or withdrawing a total of 200,000 RMB to other people's bank cards or Alipay accounts. Defendants Gao and Li, knowing the funds were illegal proceeds from criminal activities, still provided their bank cards or Alipay accounts to assist Cheng in withdrawing and transferring 100,000 RMB to specified accounts. On August 26, 2020, defendants Gao and Li were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that between May and July 2, 2014, the defendants Li and Wang, with the intent of making a profit, repeatedly organized Zhao and 23 other individuals to gamble using methods such as \"filling the pit,\" \"Fight the Landlord,\" and \"Pai Gow\" at the house rented by Li. They illicitly profited over 3,000 RMB from these activities, which the two defendants squandered. On July 2, 2014, Li and Wang were apprehended by public security authorities. The prosecuting authority provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, site inspection records and photos, and the defendants' confessions to support the charges.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain place accused that in March 2015, in room 8206 of Wenxing Coffee Hotel in Dongquan Town, Liucheng County, the defendant Li alone accommodated Wu to use the drug K powder once, and together with the defendant Zheng, accommodated Wu to use the drug K powder twice. To support the facts of the accusation, the prosecution presented evidence materials in court, including the confessions of the defendants, testimonies of witnesses, and identification records.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on June 27, 2018, at approximately midnight, the defendants Xie and Jia, after premeditation, stole a Changan Ounuo minivan with the license plate number Chuan A×××××, which was parked by the victim, Zhang, in an open area next to a middle school in a certain district of a certain city. They then drove the vehicle to the underground parking lot of a hotel in a certain district and parked it there. On June 27, 2018, Xie and Jia were apprehended and brought to justice. According to the appraisal, the stolen vehicle is valued at 24,453 yuan. The prosecution has presented evidence to the court regarding the aforementioned allegations, including the victim's statement, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, and the defendants' confessions.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Wang was the operator of the Yulongxuan Leisure Club located on the 17th floor of the Huanwen Forest Hotel in Yuhua District, Changsha City, and was responsible for the management of the leisure center. The defendant Yang was responsible for reception work at the leisure center. On August 3, 2015, at around 10:00 PM, defendant Yang introduced prostitutes Sang and Deng (both administratively penalized) to patrons Peng and Zhou (both administratively penalized) in rooms 1722 and 1723 of the said leisure center, engaging in prostitution activities for a price of 700 yuan. They were apprehended on the scene by the police authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Yang during the trial proceedings. Additionally, these facts are substantiated by evidence including the incident report from the First Security Management Brigade of the Yuhua Branch of the Changsha Public Security Bureau, inspection transcripts, on-site photographs, a list of seized items, room booking registration forms, a copy of the business license for corporate legal entities, the house rental contract, recognition records and photographs of prostitutes Sang and patron Peng identifying each other, and prostitutes Deng and patron Zhou identifying each other, recognition records and photographs of patron Peng and Zhou identifying defendant Yang, and recognition records and photographs of defendant Yang, and prostitutes Sang and Deng identifying defendant Wang. Furthermore, these are proven by the Public Security Administrative Punishment Decisions numbered (2015) 1430, 1431, 1432, 1433 by the Yuhua Branch of the Changsha Public Security Bureau, witness testimonies from Peng, Zhou, Deng, Sang, and Zhan, as well as statements and identity, current performance materials of defendants Wang and Yang, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on November 20, 2013, after purchasing a package of drugs from the defendant Xue, the defendant Zhang was caught by police in the act of selling these drugs to a person named Li at the Shangnan Jingshun Gas Station, Shajing Street, Bao'an District, in a certain city. The drugs involved and 600 RMB in drug money were seized. The confiscated drugs were found to weigh 1.66 grams and contained methamphetamine, according to the assessment. Subsequently, Zhang led the police to arrest Xue at the bottom of Building 27, Lane 1, Xinqiao Xiner Village, Shajing Street, Bao'an District, in the same city. A package of drugs was seized from Xue's person and residence. Upon assessment, the two packages of drugs were found to collectively weigh 4.16 grams and contained methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xue and Zhang during the court hearings and were confirmed by relevant evidence verified during the trial, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges that on the night of August 28, 2015, defendants Wang, Chen, Hu, and Xu, along with Wang B, Wan, Wang A, Gong, and Li (all handled in separate cases), were singing and drinking at the \"Sapphire\" KTV in a town in Chongyang County. Without cause, they assaulted Wu Yi and knocked him to the ground with beer bottles. When Wang Yi and Deng tried to intervene, they were also injured by Wang and others. According to forensic identification, Wu Yi sustained chest injuries causing a fracture of the sternum body, which constitutes minor injury of the second degree. The injuries to Wang Yi and Deng were determined to be minor of the fifth degree.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 12:00 on October 9, 2015, the defendants Liu and Huang, along with Chen and another man (all handled in separate cases), received the victim Li, who owed a gambling debt of 150,000 local currency, at a port entry in a certain city. The defendants Liu, Huang, and others took the victim Li into a white Ford car to pursue the gambling debt. During this time, defendant Liu used his fists and palms to strike the victim Li's chest and face, while defendant Huang assisted Liu by restraining Li to prevent resistance. Later, Liu handcuffed Li's hands and placed a full black blindfold on him, then drove to an industrial area in a certain town and a certain temple. On October 10, 2015, at 19:00, after Li managed to collect 60,000 yuan, Liu and Huang took the 60,000 yuan, Li's iPhone 6, and a diamond ring and dropped Li off near a certain sea area. An appraisal determined that the injuries suffered by Li were minor. On December 29, 2015, Liu and Huang were arrested at Rong Xinyuan and Yinxiang Xincun in the city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Huang during the trial, and were confirmed with the testimony of the victim Li and identification records, witness testimony from Chen, detention records, seizure documents, evidence inspection lists, receipts for phone sales, bank card statement inquiries, diamond ring sales record, copies of entry and exit endorsements, evidence collection notices, evidence collection lists, account information, communication records, arrest reports, explanatory statements, household registration certificates, certificates of (no) criminal record, lists of items and documents transferred with the case, forensic examination reports on the degree of bodily injury, notification of appraisal opinions, photos of the scene and involved items, and a CD among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 3 a.m. on July 28, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, after drinking, went to the \"Mango Adult Products Store\" located at No. 119, Jialing River Street, in a certain district of a certain city, and without any reason, damaged the cameras and vending machines inside the store, causing scratches to the plexiglass of one vending machine. At around 2 a.m. on August 4, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, after drinking, returned to the \"Mango Adult Products Store\" at the same address and again, without any reason, damaged the cameras and vending machines inside the store, using bricks to smash the vending machines and the glass door, resulting in damage to the cameras, glass door, as well as the coin acceptor and motherboard of the vending machines. At around 3 a.m. on August 15, 2014, defendants Chen and Ma, together with Zhu (dealt with in a separate case) and after drinking, went to the \"Mango Adult Products Store\" at the same address, and without any reason, used bricks to smash the cameras, vending machines, and glass door inside the store, causing damage to the cameras, glass door, the vending machines' motherboards, and inflatable dolls. These items could not be appraised for value. During the trial, defendants Chen and Ma did not contest these facts, which were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Cui, Gao, and Zhu; statements from victims Zong and Li; inspection records, identification records; audio-visual materials; a notice of non-acceptance of price appraisal, physical evidence photos, video screenshots, invoices, purchase contracts, receipts, explanatory notes, basic population information, phone inquiry records, as well as the source and capture process of the case, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. Through mediation, defendants Chen and Ma reached a reconciliation agreement with victim Zong, voluntarily agreeing to jointly compensate victim Zong for all economic losses amounting to 30,000 RMB and obtained the victim's forgiveness.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Ma": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from December 2015 to January 2016, the defendants Cheng and Chen set up tables and provided gambling tools in the small shop they ran out of their own home in the Chen Family Natural Village in a certain town, district, and city. They facilitated gambling activities using Pai Gow tiles and collected profits by taking a cut ranging from tens to hundreds of yuan as house commission, with more than ten people participating in gambling each day. On May 15, 2019, the defendants Cheng and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Xinjian Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed their criminal conduct. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings and were sufficiently substantiated by witness testimonies from individuals such as Deng B, Deng A, Xia, Cheng A, Chen A, Chen B, Chen C, and Chen D, as well as evidence including 110 police information, administrative penalty decisions, and records of their surrender. The defense's argument that the defendant Cheng voluntarily surrendered, has no prior criminal record, and is a first-time offender aligns with the facts and evidence presented in the trial, and the court accepts this viewpoint.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 21:30 on November 19, 2013, the defendants Han, Dan, and Yang, after consuming alcohol, got into an argument with the victim Zhang in front of the Jinzhangshao Restaurant on Jianguo Road, Guangyang District, Langfang City, because Han was reversing his car. The three defendants then punched and kicked Zhang, resulting in facial injuries. According to an assessment, the victim Zhang sustained minor injuries. It was also found that after the incident, a relative of the defendant Han voluntarily compensated the victim for the entire economic loss on behalf of all three defendants, totaling 75,000 RMB, and received the victim's understanding and forgiveness. These facts were undisputed during the court hearing by the three defendants and were corroborated by their confessions to the police, the victim Zhang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Tao and Li, identification records, the injury assessment, photographs of the injuries, audio-visual materials, an explanation of the case, basic information about the permanent residents, a settlement agreement, and a letter of forgiveness, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Dan": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses that at approximately 1:39 AM on November 12, 2014, after planning, the defendants Lin and Ye, in a certain town's Zero Hour Cyber Café in Yueqing City, used the URL, account, and password of the cyber café's Sijie recharge platform, which they had obtained earlier at the Mercedes Cyber Café in the same town, to access the platform and actually steal 3,944.15 yuan from the Sijie recharge platform account of the cyber café. They used the stolen money to purchase Junnet prepaid cards and, after recharging them, conducted transactions through an online trading platform, obtaining 3,381.42 yuan in cash. It was also found that the defendants Lin and Ye, along with their families, compensated the victim Xue with 4,400 yuan. The defendants Lin and Ye raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, and there is sufficient evidence to establish the facts, including lists of seized items and returned items, photos, bank account details, game website registration accounts and sales information, business licenses, permits, IP proof, card theft records, mediation agreement documents, proof of previous offenses verification, household registration proof, arrest process documentation, and victim Xue's statement.", "label": {"Lin": ["Fine"], "Ye": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate filed a charge, alleging: On March 28, 2016, at around 7:00 PM, the off-road vehicle with the local license number Q××××× driven by the defendant Chen collided with the sedan with the local license number Q××××× on Liangqiao Road in front of the \"Oriental Myth\" location in Lichuan City. As a result, a dispute and scuffle occurred between the parties involved. During the scuffle, the defendant Chen used a handbag to hit the head of the other party's Li, causing bleeding, and was also beaten by Li and others. Subsequently, both parties were separated by on-site traffic police. Feeling aggrieved after being beaten, defendant Chen called defendant Mao to the scene to assist in the fight. When defendant Mao arrived at the scene, Chen had already been taken away by police officers from the Dongcheng Police Station, while Li and others remained on-site handling the traffic accident. Defendant Mao, seeing blood on Li's face, rushed forward and punched Li, injuring his nose. According to the forensic appraisal, Li's scalp laceration and soft tissue damage constituted minor injuries; his nasal and maxillary frontal bone fractures constituted secondary minor injuries. The People's Procuratorate of a certain location submitted evidence to the court, including documentary evidence, witness testimony, appraisal opinions, victim statements, defendant confessions, and on-site inspection records, in support of the above allegations. The People's Procuratorate argues tha", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Mao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on September 15, 2015, defendants Jiang and Song drove a small van with a license plate of T××××× to a construction site near a certain village in the New District of a certain city. They, along with three other men (handled in a separate case), stole cables from the construction site, with defendant Song acting as a lookout. After the theft, defendants Jiang and Song sold the stolen cables to a scrap recycling station at Baijiao Sand Yard in a certain district of the city and profited 380 yuan. On September 16, 2015, defendants Jiang and Song again drove the same van to the same construction site with the aforementioned men to continue stealing cables, with defendant Song serving as a lookout. After this second theft, Jiang and Song headed to the scrap recycling station at Baijiao Sand Yard again but were apprehended by investigators upon arrival. All the cables stolen by defendants Jiang and Song on September 15 and 16, 2015, were recovered. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables were valued at a total of 24,204.6 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jiang and Song during the trial and were corroborated by their confessions and defenses during the investigation stage, testimonies of witnesses Huang, Chen, and Li, statements by the employee Zhang from the victimized unit, the arrest process, explanatory memorandum, seizure decision, seizure list, appraisal opinion, site photos, site inspection records, restitution list, household registration proof, and related evidence recorded in the trial transcript, fully substantiating the case. The People's Procuratorate of the New District of Zhuhai, through sentencing recommendation No. 16 (2016) of the Pearl Transitory Procuratorate Public Prosecution, recommended the court to sentence defendant Jiang to fixed-term imprisonment of more than eight months and less than one year and six months, along with a fine, and to sentence defendant Song to fixed-term imprisonment of less than one year, along with a fine.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on December 20, 2014, the defendant Zhang, in order to organize a gambling operation for profit, discussed with defendants Zhu and Li A (at large) to have them bring participants for gambling, offering them a certain percentage of the profit. At around 11 p.m. that night, defendant Zhang organized a group of people to gamble in a storage room at the dormitory of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in Raoyang County. Zhu and Li A both brought people to participate in the gambling, while defendants Li, Liu, and Zhao acted as lookouts. Over twenty individuals participated in gambling that night and were apprehended by law enforcement, with gambling funds amounting to 54,000 yuan seized on site. After the incident, defendant Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Zhang, Zhu, Li, Liu, and Zhao during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the identification records of defendants Zhang and Zhao, the seizure decision of Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, the inventory of seized items, photos of the crime scene, the case-solving report, the administrative penalty decision of Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, a set of Pai Gow tiles and three walkie-talkies used as tools in the crime, and the household registration certificates of defendants Zhang, Zhu, Li, Liu, and Zhao, all of which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: During September 2014, the defendant Liu sold methamphetamine to Li multiple times and instructed the defendant Yang to conduct six transactions with drug user Li near designated locations: under the Xin Qiao Hotel next to the Liuyan Minsheng Hospital, in the stairway of the Wuyan Shen Zhou Xing Business Hotel, by the roadside outside the courtyard wall of the Hong Fa Hotel on Chaoyang South Road (twice delivering methamphetamine), in front of the Health Supervision Bureau on Liulin Road, and in front of the Bo'ai Hospital on Liulin Road. Liu delivered a total of six bags of methamphetamine to drug user Li at 300 yuan per bag (approximately 0.5 grams each). On October 10, 2014, the defendant Liu instructed the defendant Jin to sell approximately 0.3 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Zhang for 300 yuan, by the roadside in front of the Sanyan Post Office on Renmin Road in a certain district. On October 21, 2014, the defendant Liu again instructed the defendant Jin to sell approximately 0.1 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Zhang for 300 yuan, by the roadside in front of the Sanyan Post Office on Renmin Road. The defendant Liu purchased a large quantity of drugs outside the city and, at around 18:00 on October 22, 2014, was apprehended by the police at the Wudang Mountain Highway Toll Station exit in a certain city while riding in a white C-RV SUV (License Plate: E A×××××) driven by her husband, Liu Jia. The police seized a total of 198.26 grams of methamphetamine (four bags with net weights of 49.45 grams, 49.62 grams, 49.43 grams, and 49.76 grams, respectively) and a total of 25.23 grams of Magu (two bags with net weights of 20.55 grams and 4.68 grams, respectively) from the blue handbag and the bra of defendant Liu. Analysis confirmed the presence of methamphetamine components. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: 1. Physical evidence; 2. Documentary evidence; 3. Witness testimonies; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants; 5. Expert opinions; 6. Inspection and identification records.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. In January 2014, the defendant Wang, with the intent of profit-making, organized Zhong, Zhu, Zhang, and others to gamble by playing \"Niu Niu\" with playing cards for 14 rounds in Room 8 of a chess and card room opened by Yu at XX Yuanman Road, a town in a certain district of a certain city, earning an illegal commission of more than 14,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Wang was also responsible for taking the commission; defendant Yu provided the venue and illegally profited more than 2,800 RMB. 2. In October of the same year, defendant Wang, with the intent of profit-making, organized Zhong, Zhang, Zhu, Chu, and others to gamble by playing \"Niu Niu\" with playing cards for 9 rounds, earning an illegal commission of more than 18,000 RMB. Among these, he organized 5 rounds of gambling at Ma's (handled in a separate case) rented premises in a certain town, earning an illegal commission of more than 10,000 RMB; he organized 3 rounds at defendant Yao's home in the Dongxiaoxi community of a certain town, earning an illegal commission of more than 6,000 RMB; and he organized 1 round in Room 8 of a certain chess and card room, earning an illegal commission of more than 2,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Wang was also responsible for taking the commission; defendant Yao provided the venue and illegally profited 600 RMB. The evidence for the charges includes documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions and defenses, identification records, and photographs.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the night of July 12, 2017, defendants Zhang, Huang, and Duan used drugs together at Zhang's home. Later, when Zhang left, he instructed Huang and Duan to deliver drugs to a buyer. At around 9 PM that evening, Zhang received a call from Chen, who wanted to purchase drugs for 100 yuan (currency below is the same). Zhang called Huang to deliver the drugs to Chen. Duan handed Huang a cigarette box containing the drugs. Huang then handed the cigarette box to Chen near the Lingchuan County bus station, and Chen paid Huang 100 yuan. Huang returned and gave the 100 yuan from the drug sale to Duan. Duan claimed there was a mistake in the drug quantity delivered by Huang, and the two went to the entrance of the Daxu Clinic to demand the excess drugs back from Chen. Huang, Duan, and Chen were caught on the spot. Police recovered the 100 yuan given by Chen to Huang from Duan and found 4 small bags of drugs on Chen, with a net weight of 0.72 grams after being weighed in person. Upon examination, the seized drugs tested positive for methamphetamine. Regarding the criminal facts alleged above, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions from the defendants, expert opinions, and identification records in court.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Duan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecutors charged that on May 19, 2013, at around 18:00, defendants Tang and Huang collected 1,300 RMB from an individual named Li at an internet cafe in a certain district of a city, and then proceeded to the eleventh floor of a rental building in the same district where they purchased 19.6 grams of the drug known as K-powder from defendant Jiang for 1,100 RMB. On the same day, at around 20:00, Tang and Huang returned to the internet cafe and handed over the purchased K-powder to Li. The transaction was completed when the police apprehended them on the spot. Laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of the drug ketamine in the seized K-powder. Additionally, it was found that on May 19, 2013, the police arrested defendants Tang and Huang, and on May 23, 2013, defendant Jiang was arrested. The aforementioned facts have been uncontested by defendants Jiang, Tang, and Huang during court proceedings, and are substantiated by evidence, including criminal case registration forms, household registration certificates, arrest records, lists of seized items, testimonies from witnesses Li and Luo, confessions and defenses by defendants Jiang, Tang, and Huang, forensic examination report No. 535 issued by the Southern Public Security Forensic Laboratory in 2013, identification records, site identification transcripts, and photographs, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Nanshan District in a certain city charges: On October 19, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the defendants Qin, Bi, Mo, and Li (dealt with in a separate case) were inside a bakery on the first floor of Xindejiayuan Yuemingxuan, Xuefu Road, Nanshan District, in a certain city. While the victim Wu was paying, Bi, Mo, and Li were responsible for covering, and Qin used tweezers to steal the Apple iPhone 6 phone from Wu's shoulder bag, after which the four took a taxi to escape to another location. Later, Bi sold the aforementioned phone for 1,500 RMB, and the proceeds from the sale were divided equally among the four. According to an appraisal, the stolen Apple iPhone 6 64GB phone was valued at 3,870 RMB.", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at about 8:00 p.m. on June 11, 2013, the defendants Zhu, Yuan, and another individual (handled in a separate case) took the victim, Xu, from his home to the intersection of Changdi Street and Youyi South Road in the Jianghan District of this city due to a debt dispute, and forcefully pushed him into a white Buick car. An individual named Xu (who is at large) and others followed closely behind in a van, and both vehicles arrived at a certain town in a certain district. Defendant Zhu contacted Xiao (handled in a separate case), while defendants Yuan, another individual, and others controlled the victim Xu. After Xiao and others arrived, Xu left, and the defendants Zhu, Yuan, another individual, and Xiao, among others, held the victim Xu at a house near the border of a certain location in a certain district of this city, then defendants Zhu, Yuan, and another individual left. Subsequently, Xiao and others continued to illegally restrict the personal freedom of the victim Xu, during which Xiao and others assaulted him and took 3,800 yuan in cash he carried and withdrew 2,000 yuan from his bank card. Until the early morning of the 13th of the same month, defendant Zhu released the victim Xu by car. According to the forensic identification opinion, the victim Xu suffered minor injuries. Upon the victim's report, the public security organs arrested defendants Zhu and Yuan on August 13, 2013, based on clues. It was further found that after the incident, defendant Zhu compensated the victim Xu with 5,000 yuan for his economic loss, and the victim Xu expressed understanding towards the defendants Zhu and others. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants during the trial and are supported by on-site and injury photos, bank card transaction records, agreements, and a criminal understanding letter, a basic resident information form, identification records, the public security organs' arrest and case-solving proceedings, witness testimony from Zhou, a statement from the victim Xu, and the forensic identification opinion, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at approximately 1:00 a.m. on June 8, 2013, in a city at the west 100 meters south of the road at the intersection of Zhongshan West Road and Xiyu Bridge Road in Yanzhou District, defendant Wang had an argument with the victim, Dong, over trivial matters in front of the \"Xuefeng Fast Food\" store. Subsequently, Wang gathered defendant Wu and others to engage in a brawl with Dong. During the altercation, Wu stabbed Dong with a dagger. According to the appraisal, Dong suffered minor injuries. The prosecutor presented and read aloud evidence in court regarding the facts charged in the indictment, including the confessions of the defendants Wang and Wu, the statement of the victim Dong, testimonies from witnesses Li and Wang A, the appraisal opinion, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on December 8, 2014, at around 16:00, the defendants Yuan and Wang went to the northwest corner of the Xishi Road intersection in this city, near bus stop 526, to commit theft. Wang acted as a lookout while Yuan took advantage of the victim Gao's moment of boarding the bus to steal a black \"BBK\" brand mobile phone from the pocket of Gao's coat. Yuan then immediately handed the phone to Wang, and the two fled the scene. According to an appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 300 RMB. On the same day, defendants Yuan and Wang were apprehended and brought to justice, and the stolen phone was found on Wang at the time of arrest. After the case was solved, the stolen phone was lawfully returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and Wang during the court trial and are supported by evidence, including the report materials, the process of arrest, household registration certificates, a list of seized items, and receipts; the testimony of witness Li; the statement of victim Gao; confessions of defendants Yuan and Wang; appraisal conclusions; extraction records, identification records, and photographs, which are sufficient to establish the case. The defense for defendant Wang argues that Wang was an accomplice; pleaded guilty, showed remorse, and was a first-time and occasional offender; and as the stolen goods have been recovered, suggests that the court impose a lenient sentence on Wang.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Between February 14, 2016, and March 2, 2016, the defendant Liu operated a gambling den in the form of \"Si Zhang\" in the basement at No. 1 Yanhe Road, Songmen Town, a certain city, and profited by taking a rake from the gamblers. The gambling den operated for a total of 18 days, yielding a profit of approximately 10,000 RMB. The defendant Tang assisted the defendant Liu in managing the casino from February 21, 2016, to March 2, 2016, for a total of 11 days. On March 2, 2016, police officers from the Songmen Town Police Station of a certain city's Public Security Bureau caught the defendants Liu and Tang on the spot in the basement at No. 1 Yanhe Road, Songmen Town. After being brought to justice, the defendants Liu and Tang truthfully confessed their involvement in the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Tang during the court hearing, and were supported by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Zhu, Yang, Ye, Pan, Hu, Zheng, Chen, Zhang, Chen, and Yu, inspection records, an interrogation video disc, defendants' household registration certificates, criminal record inquiries, a description of the arrest process, photographs, evidence preservation decision documents, evidence preservation lists, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, confiscated items lists, explanatory notes, past criminal materials, and administrative penalty decision documents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that from May to June 2015, the defendant Liu, in collusion with defendants Yang, Tang, Cheng, and Zhao (handled in a separate case), committed fraud in various locations in certain districts of a certain city using the guise of a \"miracle doctor\" to ward off disasters. They defrauded Wang of 2,655 yuan and a pair of gold earrings (valued at approximately 800 yuan); swindled Yan out of 18,600 yuan; cheated Yun out of 2,400 yuan and a gold ring and a gold pendant (valued at 3,610 yuan); and defrauded an elderly woman surnamed Lin of 650 yuan and a pair of gold earrings (valued at 821 yuan). On June 4, 2015, defendants Liu, Yang, Tang, and Cheng were apprehended by public security at the Ehuang Bridge toll station. The prosecution presented the following evidence in court to support the charges: 1) documentary evidence including call records, lists of seized items, identification transcripts, receipts, letters of understanding, criminal verdicts, proof of arrest, personal information forms, and household registration certificates; 2) appraisal opinions; 3) testimonies of witnesses Wang, Yan, and Yun; and 4) confessions and defenses of defendants Yang, Tang, and Cheng.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain city's district people's procuratorate charges that the defendants, Dong and Qiang, became acquainted with the victim, Qu, through online chatting. On December 27, 2013, Qu invited the defendant Dong for dinner. Dong, in turn, asked the defendant Qiang to accompany him, and Qu invited the victim, Hu, to join them. After having dinner together, the four went to a private room at a karaoke venue in a district of the city to sing and drink. During this time, the defendants Dong and Qiang took advantage of moments when victims Qu and Hu were not paying attention to jointly steal one Samsung phone valued at 3,312 yuan and one Huawei phone valued at 2,136 yuan, which were placed on the table in the private room. The defendants Dong and Qiang then left the scene at an opportune moment. After the incident, the public security organs recovered the stolen phones and returned them to the two victims. Further investigations revealed that on December 28, 2013, at around 2 p.m., police officers from a district's public security bureau apprehended the defendant Dong, and subsequently, with Dong's assistance, the defendant Qiang was also apprehended. After being brought to justice, both defendants Dong and Qiang made truthful confessions of their criminal acts. During the trial, the defendants Dong and Qiang also confessed to these facts without objection. These facts are corroborated by evidence presented and verified during the trial, including statements from victims Qu and Hu, case registration documents, the decision to file the case, explanations of the circumstances of their arrival into custody, household registration information, identification records, search records and photos, lists of seized and returned items, notifications of evidence collection, call records, purchase invoices, certifications, and appraisal reports of the phone values, which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Zhou and Xie had no objections to the facts and charges brought by the public prosecution, nor did they provide any reasoning for defense. It has been found through investigation: 1. In early June 2019, defendant Zhou, in conjunction with defendant Xie, went to a certain village on Songshan Street in a certain city to commit a burglary, stealing 20 yuan in cash and a package of gold-colored lumps from the home of a person named Wang. 2. At around 13:00 on June 11, 2019, defendant Zhou, in conjunction with defendant Xie, went to a certain village on Songshan Street in a certain city to commit a burglary, stealing over 10 yuan in cash and a voice recorder from the home of a person named Liu. 3. At around 13:00 on June 14, 2019, defendant Zhou, in conjunction with defendant Xie, went to a certain village on Songshan Street in a certain city to commit a burglary, stealing 800 yuan in cash and a Xiaomi mobile phone from the home of a person named Cui. The stolen Redmi NOTE phone and the Sheng Lishi brand voice recorder were appraised to have a value of 150 yuan. The above facts were uncontested by defendants Zhou and Xie during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence presented in court by the public prosecution, including documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendant confessions, appraisal opinions, and on-site investigation records. These were examined and verified in the trial and are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Prosecutorial authorities allege: On the evening of November 15, 2014, defendants Yang and Lai, in a rented room at 502, No. 7, Village Road, Shangliquan Village, Qixing Street, Xinchang County, financed 300 yuan by defendant Yang for Wang to purchase methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\"). Subsequently, they accommodated Liang A, Liang B, Wang A, and Wang B to smoke it together. On November 17 of the same year, defendants Yang and Lai along with Liang A were apprehended by the police. Their urine samples tested positive using a colloidal gold method for methamphetamine testing reagent. On November 18, 2014, defendant Yang was administratively detained for twenty days by the Xinchang County Public Security Bureau for drug use and providing drugs to others (not enforced); defendant Lai was administratively detained for ten days by the Xinchang County Public Security Bureau for drug use (not enforced). On January 13, 2015, defendant Yang was administratively detained for fifteen days by the Xinchang County Public Security Bureau for drug use; on January 19, 2015, the same bureau decided to impose two years of compulsory drug rehabilitation on Yang. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Yang and Lai during the trial. Additionally, the testimonies of witnesses Liang A, Liang B, Wang A, Wang B, Shi, the process of bringing suspects to justice, examination records, urine sample extraction records, on-site testing reports, rental records, statements, lists of confiscated items, lists of destroyed items, Xinchang County Public Security Bureau administrative penalty decision letters, compulsory drug rehabilitation decision letters, and household registration certificates serve as evidence confirming these facts sufficiently.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From August 2013 to June 17, 2014, defendants Xu and Zheng in a factory at Baiqiangmen of a certain town, Cixi City, (south of Yuyao City Tianwang Waterproof Material Co., Ltd.), without approval from the industrial and commercial and environmental protection departments and without setting up pollutant treatment facilities, illegally engaged in the production of zinc-plated metal parts. They discharged the wastewater generated during production into the environment after simple treatment, illegally profiting more than 20,000 RMB during this period. On June 17, 2014, the Cixi City Environmental Inspection Team took samples of the wastewater discharged from this processing plant. According to monitoring by the Cixi City Environmental Monitoring Station, and recognized by the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Environmental Protection, the involved wastewater contained hexavalent chromium and other heavy metals, with a hexavalent chromium concentration of 25.5 mg/L, exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards in the \"Electroplating Pollutant Discharge Standard\" by more than three times. After being brought to justice, both defendants Xu and Zheng truthfully confessed their crimes. During the trial, defendant Zheng pre-returned a total of 15,000 RMB in illegal gains and other payments. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Zheng during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Bai, and Li, the monitoring report from the Cixi City Environmental Protection Bureau, identification transcripts and photos, the on-site inspection transcript from the Cixi City Environmental Protection Bureau, the case transfer letter from the Cixi City Environmental Protection Bureau, the monitoring (testing) project entrustment order, the pollution source wastewater sampling and transfer records, the original records of water sample testing, the participants’ situation explanations, the quality assurance specification, the document from the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Environmental Protection, the case capture process, and the identification of defendants Xu and Zheng, among other evidence, all of which are sufficient to reach a determination.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: At approximately 3:50 AM and again at approximately 4:45 AM on January 30, 2015, defendants Huang and Liang were in the parking lot under Building 4 in Complex C in a certain district of the city. Defendant Huang was responsible for contacting buyers, while Liang was responsible for delivery. They sold a total of 3 grams of the drug K powder to Yang over two transactions. Defendant Liang was apprehended on the spot and assisted the public security authorities in arresting defendant Huang. A total of 3 grams of drugs were confiscated on the scene. According to the drug identification center of the Guiyang Public Security Bureau, the substance was identified as ketamine. The prosecution claims that the actions of defendants Huang and Liang violated Articles x and x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constitute x crime(s). They have initiated a public prosecution in this court, providing relevant evidence to support their claim and recommending that defendant Huang be sentenced to six months to one year of imprisonment and fined, while recommending defendant Liang be sentenced to three to five months of detention and fined.\n\nDuring the trial, defendants Huang and Liang did not dispute the facts of the crimes as charged by the prosecution and voluntarily confessed in court. Upon investigation, it was found that at approximately 3:50 AM and again at approximately 4:45 AM on January 30, 2015, defendant Huang was responsible for contacting the buyer by phone, and defendant Liang was responsible for delivery. In the parking lot under Building 4 in Complex C in a certain district of the city, they sold a total of 3 grams of drugs to Yang over two transactions. Defendant Liang was apprehended by public security authorities at the time of the transaction, and he assisted in the arrest of defendant Huang.\n\nThe public security authorities confiscated a total of 3 grams of suspected drug substances on the spot, which were identified by the Guiyang Public Security Bureau's drug identification center as ketamine. These facts are sufficiently substantiated by the confessions of defendants Huang and Liang, household registration certificates, witness testimonies, records of capture, drug seizure, and measurement logs issued by the public security authorities, the drug examination report No. (Poison Inspection) (2015) 0257 from Guiyang, and drug receipts, among other evidence.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xinluo District in a certain city charges: On April 14, 2014, at approximately 23:50, the defendants He and Yang, along with Ran, Guo, Deng (all previously sentenced), and others, were leaving the Caesar KTV private room on the second floor of the East Asia Mall in West City, Xinluo District. As they were heading downstairs, Ran, under the influence of alcohol, started a fight with a group of passersby using the excuse of \"disliking their looks.\" Afterwards, Ran was dissatisfied with having been injured and asked Guo to call Yang, who had gone home earlier, along with Jiang (handled in a separate case), to return and help find this group for revenge. Subsequently, the defendants He and Yang, together with Ran, Guo, Deng, Jiang, and others, while searching for targets for retaliation in the vicinity, unjustifiably attacked individuals such as Chen, Liao, and Shi, who were drinking at a nearby stall, using bricks and other tools. According to a forensic evaluation by the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, the injuries sustained by the victims Chen, Liao, and Shi were classified as minor injuries. It was also found that on October 23, 2014, the defendant He was apprehended by the public security organs. On July 25, 2014, the defendant Yang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs. After the incident, the families of Ran, He, and Guo compensated the three victims for their economic losses with a sum of 4,000 yuan, and the defendant Yang compensated the three victims with 1,000 yuan. The three victims expressed understanding and forgiveness for the actions of the defendants He and Yang. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants He and Yang during the trial. Additionally, there are supporting evidences such as the household registration certificates of defendants He and Yang, details of their surrender and apprehension, statements from victims Chen, Liao, and Shi, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, receipts, a letter of understanding, a forensic evaluation opinion issued by the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau, and confessions from the co-defendants Ran, Guo, Deng, Jiang, as well as from defendants He and Yang, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it was found that from June 15 to June 28, 2014, the defendants Chen and Zhu, after prior consultation, acted as agents for the \"Crown 0088\" gambling website at locations such as the New Bridge Road Business Hotel in Taoyuan Street, Ninghai County. They solicited individuals, including Zhang, Yu, and Shen, to gamble on the website through football betting, with the total betting funds exceeding RMB 640,000. On June 28, 2014, the casino was raided by the public security authorities. During this period, defendants Chen and Zhu illegally profited more than RMB 21,120, of which defendant Chen illegally profited more than RMB 13,120, and defendant Zhu illegally profited more than RMB 8,000. On June 28, 2014, defendant Zhu was arrested by the public security authorities; on November 3 of the same year, defendant Chen was arrested by the public security authorities. After the incident, the unlawful earnings of defendants Chen and Zhu were temporarily confiscated by the public security authorities. These facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhu during the court trial and were substantiated by evidence such as the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Yu, Shen, Hu, Sun, and Jiang, identification records, remote inspection work records and webpage screenshots, betting lists, bank transaction details, a provincial pre-receipt (temporarily detained) funds receipt, details of the arrests, administrative penalty decision documents, and identification proofs, which are sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality accused: Between March and July 7, 2018, the defendants Shen and Li set up a QQ red envelope group to organize individuals such as Hu, Jiang, and Chen to gamble using the \"red envelope landmines\" method. They set up an \"exemption number\" (QQ number 35×××13) to grab red envelopes and take a cut for profit. Between March 23 and July 7, 2018, defendants Shen and Li profited a total amount of more than 567,900 RMB by taking cuts. After defendant Li was brought to justice, he truthfully confessed his criminal facts and returned 30,000 RMB of illicit money. After committing the crime, defendant Shen voluntarily turned himself in, truthfully confessed his criminal facts, and returned 50,000 RMB of illicit money. To substantiate the above charges, the public prosecutor presented various pieces of evidence during the trial, including the \"Explanation of the Inquiry into Records of Illegal and Criminal Activities\" and other documentary evidence, testimonies from witnesses such as Hu, the statements and defenses of the defendants, search records, retrieval records, and electronic evidence inspection and examination work records.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Sichuan Province accused the defendants Li and Chen of committing the crime of x and filed a public prosecution with this court on September 3, 2013, with indictment No. 100 of 2013 in a certain location. After accepting the case, this court formed a collegiate bench in accordance with the law and conducted a public trial. The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in the city assigned prosecutor Zhao to appear in court to support the prosecution, and defendants Li and Chen were both present to participate in the litigation. The trial has now concluded.\n\nThe People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Sichuan Province charged: At about 13:00 on February 15, 2012, Yan (another case), to help Wang B recover debts owed by Hu, collaborated with defendants Chen, Li, Wang A (another case), and others to bring Hu to multiple locations and restrict his personal freedom. During this process, Yan, Wang A, and defendants Li and Chen all engaged in acts of assault against the victim Hu. On the same evening, Hu was taken to a villa in a certain town. In the room, Yan forced Hu to write an IOU for 190,000 yuan. The next day, in room 307 of the Jiayuan Hotel, Yan again coerced Hu into writing a mortgage agreement to devalue the car for 20,000 yuan. It was only on the afternoon of February 16 that Yan allowed Li and Xu to send Hu back.\n\nThe main evidence for the above facts includes: the confessions of the defendants, wi", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the victim, Zhang, borrowed 500,000 yuan from Yang A (the father of the defendant Yang) and did not repay it. On January 26, 2019, Yang A went to a city in a province to demand repayment from Zhang. In order to help his father collect the debt, the defendant Yang gathered the defendant Tang and, through Tang, gathered the defendants Tao and Xing, among others, to accompany him. Around the early hours of January 27, Zhang agreed to join Yang A and others to discuss the debt settlement in a district of the city and checked into room XX at XX Hotel on Tongxian Street, Chunxi Street in the city district. On the evening of January 28, Yang and his family discussed repayment matters with Zhang in room XX at XX Hotel. Around 19:00 on that day, Zhang called the police to ask Yang and others to leave his room. After Yang left the room, he remained in the hotel lobby to continue monitoring Zhang. Around 21:00 that evening, while Yang and Tao were discussing how to demand repayment, Yang suggested that Tao find a way to \"keep\" Zhang there. After Tang learned of this, he instructed Tao to follow Yang's arrangements. Around 22:00, Yang gathered Tang, Tao, Xing, and others to Zhang's room to demand repayment unsuccessfully. Tang proposed taking Zhang for a \"drive,\" and Tao and Xing drove Zhang to a dam at Lake Shijiu in a village of a town in a county in the province, where they used verbal threats to force Zhang to stand in the rain and freeze for about an hour. Only around 1:00 the next day did they bring Zhang back to Hongda Hotel. On June 5, June 6, and July 7, 2019, the defendants Tang, Tao, and Xing turned themselves in to the police; on June 5, the defendant Yang was arrested and brought to justice. All four defendants later truthfully confessed their criminal acts.", "label": {"Tang": ["Detention"], "Tao": ["Detention"], "Xing": ["Detention"], "Yang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around midnight on January 30, 2016, defendants Deng and Qiu, after having supper with the victim Chen and his friend Jiang Mouhai at a late-night food stall opposite the Mingyue Yuan Hotel, Dagang District, a village in a certain town of our city, suspected that Chen was mocking them for being drunk. Deng used fists and feet to knock Chen to the ground. Meanwhile, defendant Qiu not only prevented Jiang Mouhai from intervening but also stepped forward to punch Chen on the head, causing Chen to be injured (according to the appraisal, Chen's injury was minor, second degree). It was only after Chen knelt and begged for mercy that the two stopped and fled the scene. Later, they were apprehended by public security personnel near the aforementioned food stall. Upon being brought to justice, they truthfully confessed the criminal facts stated above. After the case was solved, Deng and Qiu compensated Chen with RMB 210,000 and received understanding from him. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Deng and Qiu during the court trial and are corroborated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, the defendants' confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at approximately 13:00 on November 11, 2015, the defendant Shen, together with the defendant Wang, went to a certain village in a certain city, and climbed over a wall to enter the home of Zhang Mouyi to steal 200 yuan. The stolen money has now been returned to Zhang Mouyi. Additionally, it was found that the defendant Wang was previously convicted of x crime and was sentenced to three years and six months imprisonment by the Kailping District People's Court of a certain city on September 10, 2012, and fined 39,000 yuan. The defendant Shen was convicted of x crime and sentenced to ten months imprisonment and fined 4,000 yuan by the Kaiping District People's Court of a certain city on January 29, 2015. On November 12, 2015, at 11:00, the defendant Shen surrendered to the Angezhuang Town Police Station of the Luan County Public Security Bureau in a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and are confirmed by the registration form for criminal cases, the process of coming to the case, confessions of defendants Wang and Shen, the statement by victim Zhang Mouyi, testimonies by witnesses Guo and Zhang Moujia, the scene inspection record by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city in Hebei Province, the criminal judgment (2012) Kai Xing Chu Zi No. 141 by the Kaiping District People's Court of a certain city in Hebei Province, the juvenile criminal judgment (2015) Kai Shao Xing Chu Zi No. 23 by the same court, and household registration proof of both defendants, which are sufficient to establish the conviction.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 14:00 on June 27, 2015, defendants Cui and Jia conspired to commit theft. Subsequently, the two drove to the roadside opposite the KSL Carton Factory on the Baofu Highway, Mancheng section, and stole a Yujie battery sightseeing vehicle parked there by Zhang. According to the appraisal by the Mancheng District Involved Items Price Appraisal Center, the stolen vehicle was valued at 14,000 yuan. The defendants sold the stolen goods for 3,000 yuan, which they split equally and spent. On December 5, 2015, defendant Jia compensated Zhang for economic losses with a one-time payment of 33,000 yuan, for which Zhang expressed understanding. On May 22, 2016, defendant Cui turned himself in to the Mancheng District Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed the facts of the theft. During the court trial, both defendants raised no objections to the above facts, which were corroborated by Zhang's statement, the price appraisal certificate of the involved items, identification records and photos, a mediation agreement, receipts, and case-solving records, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate accused that from March 2009 to January 2013, the defendants Cha and Yang served as director and deputy director of Jingzhou Food and Drug Supervision and Inspection Institute, respectively. During this period, from March 2009 to March 2011, defendant Yang was responsible for the financial work of the institute, and from April 2011 to January 2013, defendant Cha was responsible for the financial work. During their tenure managing and assisting in the management of nationally invested infrastructure projects and the institute's financial work, they demonstrated serious negligence and failed to diligently perform their duties. They did not establish or improve the internal accounting supervision system according to laws and regulations, allowing the institute's accountant Yu to hold dual roles as accountant and cashier for the infrastructure project. They did not supervise or restrict major fund allocations and failed to conduct regular or irregular checks on the institute's finances to ensure consistency between accounts and actual assets. They employed personnel unsuited to the position requirements as cashiers, leading to the loss of control over the institute's financial management. As a result, accountant Yu misappropriated a total of 5,335,336.54 yuan of public funds (537,351.70 yuan from the administrative account and 4,797,984.84 yuan from the infrastructure account) for gambling and other expenses during the period from July 2009 to January 2013. Additionally, 650,205.39 yuan from the administrative account could not be attributed to a specific person after Yu's suicide, resulting in a total loss of 5,985,541.93 yuan, which is irrecoverable, causing significant damage to public property and national interests. The prosecution provided evidence materials including documentary proofs, witness testimonies, audit reports, and confessions and defenses from the defendants.", "label": {"Cha": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "In March 2012, the People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that Zhejiang Jingtai Reflective Materials Co., Ltd. sold a batch of reflective materials to Fujian Shishi Xinshida Reflective Materials Co., Ltd. After signing the contract, the defendants Jiang and Hu, seeking personal gain, altered the contract to force Chen, the head of Jingtai Reflective Materials Co., Ltd., to lower the price. With the help of Hong, the head of Xinshida Reflective Materials Co., Ltd., the reduced price was paid to Jiang and Hu in the form of kickbacks. Subsequently, Hong transferred a total of 45,300 RMB as kickbacks via bank transfers to Hu's bank card number 6228480382282317413 in two installments. Jiang received 30,000 RMB, and Hu received 15,300 RMB. The public prosecution agency provided corresponding evidence for the facts of the above charges.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuxi City charges: The defendants Zhang, Zhu, Lv, and Xu, together with Xiao (male, handled in a separate case), carried out fraud from October to December 2019, using the fifth floor at Corner Encounter in Huaqiang Yicui Plaza, Yingde City, Guangdong Province as a fraud base. The specific method of fraud was as follows: Xiao was responsible for contacting an individual with the WeChat nickname \"Qianxun@Yinliu\" (identity unknown) to add the WeChat IDs of the fraud targets to the WeChat accounts used by defendants Zhang, Xu, Zhu, and Lv for fraudulent activities. Then, the aforementioned defendants Zhang, Xu, Zhu, and Lv each used these WeChat accounts to pretend, according to scripts prepared by Xiao, that they were a divorced woman named \"Fei'er\", and developed an ambiguous relationship with the targets. Xiao would then uniformly use these WeChat accounts to continue impersonating \"Fei'er\" and, by fabricating reasons such as needing birthday gifts, ask the targets to transfer amounts like 520 yuan, 1314 yuan, 3344 yuan via WeChat. It was agreed that Xiao would receive 60% of the fraudulent proceeds, while the individuals conducting the initial conversations would receive 40%. Since October 2019, the aforementioned individuals, using this division of labor, defrauded seven people including Zeng and Zheng residing in a certain district of this city and a certain county of another province, totaling over 32,000 yuan.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lv": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city accuses that: On the afternoon of September 12, 2014, defendants Gu and Zhao, along with Qiao (already sentenced), went to the construction site of the Dongxin section of the X302 Yanban Line (Zhongzheng-Dongxin) road expansion project in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city. Qiao, on the grounds that the road construction had caused the village's water pipes to be severed, obstructed the construction, verbally abused the workers, and got into a dispute with the site manager, Li. He was later pulled away by others. On the afternoon of September 13, 2014, defendants Gu and Zhao, along with Qiao and others, drove to the construction site again. Defendants Gu, Zhao, and Qiao, armed with machetes and other tools, injured the victims Li, Wan, Zhang Yi, and Zhang Bing, who were working on the site. According to assessments, victim Li suffered a wound on the left temporal region, fracture of the left temporal", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it has been found that at approximately 17:00 on January 7, 2014, defendants Xu and Liu had an altercation with the victim Chen due to a driving issue in front of \"Rich Garden\" on Macau Corner Road, Jianghan District in this city. Defendants Xu and Liu used fists and an iron rod to injure victim Chen's face and legs. According to the forensic examination report, victim Chen sustained a fracture to the left maxilla frontal process and a comminuted fracture of the left nasal bone, categorized as minor injuries level two. Defendant Xu called the police himself after the altercation and waited at the scene for the public security authorities to handle the situation. Defendant Liu was caught on the spot and an iron rod used as a tool in the crime was confiscated at the scene. Additionally, it was found that after the incident, defendants Xu and Liu reached a mediation agreement with victim Chen regarding civil compensation, under which defendants Xu and Liu would jointly compensate victim Chen for economic losses totaling 30,000 RMB. Victim Chen expressed understanding towards defendants Xu and Liu and waived the right to a civil lawsuit. All the facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants during the trial proceedings, and there are material evidence photos; documentation of the arrest and case resolution by public security authorities, situation reports, basic information tables on permanent residents, confiscation orders, confiscation lists, medical records, the people's mediation agreement, receipts, police dispatch forms, and other documentary evidence; victim Chen's statement and identification record; forensic examination report among other evidence serving to substantiate these findings, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on January 21, 2014, the victim Zhao was deceived by pyramid scheme members under the pretense of a job offer and taken to a Tianjin Tiens pyramid scheme hideout located at Fuchun Street in this city. Han and others restricted Zhao's personal freedom under the guise of a probationary period, using methods such as confiscating his phone, beating, verbal threats, and close surveillance. After being forced to purchase so-called \"products,\" Zhao was transferred to another pyramid scheme hideout on the sixth floor of a rented apartment in Fuchun Street, where Li, Hu, Zhang, Hou, Zheng, and others continued the illegal detention. On March 11 and March 30 of the same year, victims He and Zhang were successively deceived and brought to the hideout, where their personal freedom was similarly restricted by the six defendants until the morning of April 1, 2014, when the hideout was discovered and dismantled by police. Among the defendants, Han was the \"director\" of other \"Tianjin Tiens\" hideouts, Li was the \"director\" of the hideout on the sixth floor in Fuchun Street, Hu served as the \"housekeeper,\" and Zhang, Hou, and Zheng participated in the illegal detention actions. It was further found that the injury level of victim Zhang Mubiao was assessed as minor. These facts were uncontested during the trial; defendants Han, Li, Hu, Zhang, Hou, and Zheng all voluntarily pleaded guilty. Additionally, there are testimonies from victims Zhao, He, Zhang, and witnesses Wan, Zeng, Fu, Guo; statements and defenses from defendants Han, Li, Hu, Zhang, Hou, Zheng; phone call records and explanations; copies of medical records; household registration certificates of the six defendants; case documentation; inspection result notices; on-site investigation records and photos, diagrams; bodily inspection records and photos; and identification records and photos, all serving as evidence to substantiate these findings. Regarding Hou and Zheng's defense that they only supervised Zhang and not Zhao or He, it was verified that Hou and Zheng's activities at the hideout were corroborated by testimonies from defendant Zhang and witness Wan, as well as statements from victims Zhao, He, Zhang, confirming the facts against them. Therefore, their defense is not accepted.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of June 10, 2015, defendants Zhou and Yang conspired in advance, with Zhou carrying out the theft of the victim's gold necklace and Yang driving a vehicle for assistance. Afterwards, defendants Zhou and Yang prepared two watermelon knives and a kitchen knife, which they placed in a Honda Accord license plate K××××× rented by Yang, and stole the license plate of a car parked by the victim, Dai, at the entrance of the High Valve Factory in a certain county. On June 11, 2015, defendants Zhou and Yang fitted the stolen license plate C××××× onto the Honda Accord K××××× and traveled to a certain county, city, and district to commit multiple robberies. The specific criminal acts were as follows: 1. At approximately 12:30 on June 11, 2015, defendants Zhou and Yang drove to the front of 153 Renda Street, a town in a certain county. Defendant Zhou got out of the car and snatched a piece of gold necklace from the victim, Guohei's neck, after which defendant Yang drove the car to assist and flee the scene. According to valuation, the gold necklace was worth RMB 3,585. 2. At approximately 1:00 p.m. on June 11, 2015, defendants Zhou and Yang drove to the gate of 223 Chuanliao Road in a town in a certain county. Defendant Zhou got out of the car, snatched the gold necklace from victim Guo's neck, and pushed her down. Afterwards, defendant Yang drove the car to assist and flee the scene. According to valuation, the gold necklace was worth RMB 1,752. 3. At approx", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Yanta District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On November 2, 2014, at around 17:00, the defendants Sun and Zhou drove a Toyota SUV with the license plate Shaanxi A××××× to a Toyota car sales and service company on Jinye Second Road in the city's High-Tech Zone for vehicle maintenance. Taking advantage of the fact that no one was in the boutique area on the second floor, Zhou kept watch while Sun stole a box of Yuhu Xiang tea leaves. Later, Sun kept watch while Zhou stole one each of Huayu brand silk scarf, Tianqin brand cashmere scarf, and a ZIPPO lighter. On February 2, 2015, Sun was apprehended by the police. On February 5 of the same year, Zhou turned himself in. According to the appraisal, the stolen items were valued at a total of 3,750 yuan. After the case was solved, the stolen Huayu brand silk scarf, Tianqin brand cashmere scarf, and ZIPPO lighter were recovered and returned to the victim unit. Sun and Zhou compensated the victim unit with 3,750 yuan and obtained understanding from them.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in May 2012, defendants Dong and Li, along with Peng, Wu, and Guo (the latter three are being dealt with in separate cases), and others, set up a casino in an abandoned pig farm in a certain village in a certain town of a certain county. Every day, dozens of gamblers gathered at this casino to play Pai Gow. On November 4, 2012, at around 16:00, the casino was raided by the police, and 47 gamblers, including Hu, Zhang, and He, were caught red-handed. The police seized gambling funds amounting to 398,403 yuan, three sets of Pai Gow tiles used for gambling, and two currency counting machines. Furthermore, it was found that after Peng rented the venue and provided the gambling equipment to set up the casino, defendants Dong and Li, among others, subsequently joined in the operation of the casino. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by the defendants during the court trial and are substantiated by evidence such as photos of the Pai Gow used in the crime, the site investigation report, the seizure certificate, testimonies from Hu, Zhang, and He, confessions from Guo and Wu (co-defendants in related cases), apprehension records, and household registration documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate in a certain location charges that: Between March and June 2012, the defendants Zhou and Wang, at their deli in Ximen Market, Huanshan Street, Cixi City, used chemical raw material hydrogen peroxide solution to soak and process cooked chicken feet for sale. On June 4, 2012, law enforcement officers seized approximately 5.55 kilograms of cooked chicken feet on-site from the deli, which tested positive for hydrogen peroxide residue. During this period, the defendants Zhou and Wang illegally profited over 1,700 RMB. After being brought to justice, the defendants Zhou and Wang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, the defendants Zhou and Wang raised no objections to the above facts, which are confirmed by on-site inspection records and photos, test reports, an inventory of the items involved in the case, the circumstances of the case, and the identification documents of defendants Zhou and Wang, all sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on September 8, 2015, the defendants Jian and Xie conspired in advance to steal 10 horses in Jiangrougou of Rijing Pastoral Committee, Dawu Township, Machin County. They were caught and detained by local herdsmen during the process of transferring the horses, and later handed over to the police. According to the price appraisal, the 10 stolen horses were valued at 8,150 RMB.", "label": {"Jian": ["Fine"], "Xie": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on June 3, 2013, at approximately 8:30 PM, defendants Qu and Zhou, near the TV tower in Wenhua Park, Chancheng District, a certain city, took advantage of the victim Zhi lying on the lawn to steal a wallet placed near the victim's head. The wallet contained 100 yuan in cash and the victim's ID card, among other items. After succeeding, defendants Qu and Zhou fled the scene, but were caught by the police along with the stolen goods during the distribution of the spoils (after the case was solved, the stolen items were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Zhi). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Qu and Zhou during the court hearing and were confirmed by the victim Zhi's statement, lists of seized and returned items, price appraisal conclusions, the circumstances of their capture, household registration proof, the criminal judgment, certificate of release upon completion of sentence, as well as the confessions and identification records of defendants Qu and Zhou during the investigation phase, providing sufficient corroboration.", "label": {"Qu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that between May and July 2014, the defendants Fan, Li, and Xu were aware that Hu (who has been sentenced) was suspected of the crime of dangerous driving. During the investigation and evidence-gathering process by the public security and procuratorial organs, they still provided false testimony in an attempt to help Hu evade legal punishment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Fan, Li, and Xu during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimony of witnesses, including Hu, as well as this court's criminal judgment document (2014) Feng Criminal First No. 0373, the case report, case progress report, and identification record from Feng County Public Security Bureau, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Fan, Li, and Xu, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Surveillance"], "Li": ["Surveillance"], "Xu": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on March 30, 2015, the defendants Su and Chu, together with Luo, Chen, and Hu (all of whom have been sentenced), conspired and divided tasks before driving to the vicinity of Shuangfengt Pavilion Park on Qianchuan Street in this district. Chen and another accomplice approached the elderly woman, Li, and engaged her in conversation under false pretenses, persuading her to get into a car driven by defendant Su. Luo then impersonated a miracle doctor, falsely claiming that Li's son would encounter misfortune within three days, thus gaining Li's trust. Under the guise of being able to help avert disaster for Li's son, they deceived Li out of 15,100 yuan in cash, as well as a gold necklace valued at 2,000 yuan, a gold ring, and a pair of gold earrings. After the incident, a close relative of defendant Chu returned 5,000 yuan of the illicit money on their behalf, which has been refunded to the victim. Defendants Su and Chu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, which are supported by the victim Li's statement; the police's arrest process, identification records and photos, proof, restitution receipts, wanted persons registration form, identification materials; the valuation assessment conclusion from the Cost Administration and Price Verification Bureau of the Huangpi District, Wuhan City; the confessions of accomplices Luo, Chen, and Hu; the criminal judgments from the People's Court of Jiang'an District and the People's Court of Hanyang District in Wuhan City; and the confessions of defendants Su and Chu, providing sufficient evidence for a conviction.", "label": {"Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charges that at around 2 a.m. on January 20, 2016, the defendants Ma and Zhu, along with Zhang (dealt with in a separate case), drove to the entrance of No. 35, Shuhou Village Riverbank, a street in this city. The defendants Ma and Zhu used the method of first calling the dog and then pushing it into the car, stealing one Samoyed dog owned by the victim Fang (valued at 6,000 RMB), and later kept it at defendant Zhu's home. At around 7 p.m. the next day, defendant Zhu, needing to return to his hometown, delivered the dog to Zhang's residence for keeping and was discovered by the police at around 9 p.m. On January 21, 2016, based on clues, the police summoned defendants Ma and Zhu at the home of defendant Ma in a certain village of a certain city and at the entrance of Ai Yi Mei Hotel respectively, to the police station of a certain place under the Municipal Public Security Bureau for investigation. After the incident, the stolen Samoyed dog was recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ma and Zhu during the court proceedings and are supported by witness testimonies from Cheng and Zhang, the victim Fang's statements, the seizure decision, seizure list, return list, special receipts for temporarily seized items, explanation of recovered stolen property, video investigation report, identification records, photos, surveillance video, price appraisal report, process of coming to justice, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient for confirmation. Based on the defendants' criminal facts and circumstances, the prosecution suggests sentencing defendants Ma and Zhu to six to eight months imprisonment with probation, and imposing fines. The defense argues that defendant Ma voluntarily pleaded guilty, truthfully confessed to the criminal facts, and that the stolen property has been recovered, recommending a lighter punishment for defendant Ma with probation.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in February 1991, the No. 3 Oil Extraction Plant of the North China Oilfield drilled an oil well (Well Qiang 40) 500 meters north of a village in Beidai Township, a certain county in Hebei Province. Due to the lack of production potential, double gray surface sealing was conducted on the well from February 25-27, 1991, to prevent oil overflow and water infiltration. In 2007, the defendant Cheng discovered this well, prepared pumping equipment such as a nodding donkey, oil tanks, and oil pumps, and installed the oil theft equipment. In 2008, Cheng began stealing crude oil from this well site, hiring Cheng A (who has been sentenced) to guard the site, steal, and purify the crude oil. In April 2011, the defendant Cheng hired the defendant Huang to assist in stealing and purifying crude oil from the well. On August 29, 2012, the criminal police brigade of the Yingzhou Branch of the Jizhong Public Security Bureau seized the operation, and 11.68 tons of stolen crude oil, valued at 28,172.6 yuan, were confiscated on site. The prosecution presented in court the confessions and defenses of the defendants Cheng, Huang, and their accomplice Cheng A, along with testimonies from witnesses Mei, Li, Sun, Zhang, and Yang, proof of crude oil prices, certification from a work area of the No. 3 Oil Extraction Plant, a list of seized items, on-site inspection records, the criminal judgment, and other evidence.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a city charges that on the night of May 12, 2015, the defendants, Lin and Li, during the fishing ban period in the city, conducted illegal fishing using electric shock methods in the river near the Paijiang Branch of the Water Supply Company in a certain town of a certain district of the city, located in the waters of the outer lake of the city. At about 21:30 on the same day, Lin and Li were caught on the spot by the staff of the city's Fishery Administration Office and the police of the Paijiang Sub-bureau of the city's Public Security Bureau who were conducting joint enforcement. The batteries, bamboo poles used for illegal fishing, and about 0.5 kilograms of aquatic products caught were seized on the spot. After examination, it was found that on March 30, 2015, the city's Agricultural Bureau issued the \"Notice of the 2015 Fishing Ban Period of the City\" to the public through the newspaper, specifying \"Fishing ban area: waters of the city's outer lake; Fishing ban period: April 1 to May 31.\" On May 20, 2015, at about 13:00, following Lin's suggestion and provision of electric fishing tools, they jointly went to the river near the Paijiang Branch of the Water Supply Company in a certain town of a certain district of the city and conducted illegal fishing using electric shock methods during the fishing ban period. At about 21:30 on the same day, Lin and Li were caught on the spot by the staff of the city's Fishery Administration Office and the police of the Paijiang Sub-bureau of the city's Public Security Bureau who were conducting joint enforcement. The batteries, bamboo poles used for illegal fishing, and about 0.5 kilograms of aquatic products caught were seized on the spot. The above facts were undisputed by Lin and Li during the court trial process and are sufficiently established by the response from the Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Ocean and Fisheries regarding the implementation of the outer lake fishing ban period in the area, the notice from the Zhejiang Provincial People's Government regarding the entitlement and licensing of outer lake waters, the city's notice on the outer lake fishing ban period, testimony, photos, the process of capture, inspection records and photos, on-site identification records and identification photos, seizure decision documents, lists of seized items, household registration certificates, and other evidence.", "label": {"Lin": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges that between March and June 6, 2012, individuals including Xu Zhi, Wu, Zhang, and others (all of whom have been sentenced) opened a casino in a room at Duiqiaonong, Zhongjie Community, Luotuo Street, Zhenhai District, provided by the defendant Song. They gathered defendant He and Chen A, Ren A, Liao, Ren (all of whom have been sentenced) to assist in \"cutting corners,\" taking rake-offs, and staying on watch, and attracted individuals like Chen, Xiong, and Yang to gamble using Pai Gow tiles, profiting over 30,000 RMB. On February 27, 2013, defendant Song voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to his criminal acts. Additionally, it was found that defendant Song illegally profited 20,000 RMB, and defendant He illegally profited 3,000 RMB. These facts were acknowledged without objection by defendants Song and He during the court proceedings and are substantiated by documentary evidence, including the household registration certificates of defendants Song and He, records of arrest, criminal judgments, testimonies of witnesses Chen, Xiong, Yang, confessions of co-defendants Xu Zhi, Wu, Zhang, Chen A, Ren A, Liao, Ren, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Guangdong Province charged that, starting in August 2015, the defendant Tang leased a rental property opposite the former China Travel Agency on Guotai Road in a certain county to operate the Yali Hair Salon, during which he introduced women engaged in prostitution to engage in prostitution activities either within the store or outside. Defendant Wu was responsible for distributing prostitution solicitation cards to various hotels in a certain town and transporting women engaged in prostitution to carry out prostitution activities.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses and the court has found that on January 10, 2015, at 13:30, the defendants Fan, Zhong, and Liu, after conspiring, went to Donghuan Road in an industrial park in a certain state. They used a method where defendant Fan committed theft and defendants Zhong and Liu acted as lookouts, to steal a mobile phone worth 2,160 RMB from the victim Jin Mouyi, which was in a handbag carried by the victim. It was also found that after defendants Fan and Zhong were caught, they truthfully confessed to their crimes; the police recovered the stolen items and returned them to the victim. It was further found that defendant Fan was sentenced to five months of detention and fined 1,000 RMB on August 19, 2011, by the Zhabei District People's Court of a certain city for committing an 'x' crime; on January 20, 2014, he was sentenced again to five months of detention and fined 1,000 RMB by the Putuo District People's Court of a certain city for another 'x' crime, and was released upon completion of his sentence on March 22 that same year. Defendant Liu was sentenced to three months of detention and fined 1,000 RMB on February 4, 2010, by the Hongkou District People's Court of a certain city for committing an 'x' crime, and was released upon completion of his sentence on March 6, 2010. Defendant Zhong was administratively detained for ten days by the Huangpu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on June 7, 2008, for theft. These facts, which defendants Fan, Liu, and Zhong did not dispute during the trial, are supported by the victim Jin Mouyi's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Li Mou, Jin Moujia, and Xu Mou, identification records and photographs, physical evidence photos, invoices, price appraisal reports, records of arrest and case resolution, the public security administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, release certificates, household registration documents, and other evidence verified and confirmed in court, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Tian, due to damage to his excavator's hydraulic pump regulator, intended to steal one from another person for his own use and enlisted the help of the defendant Xing. On the night of October 29, 2016, the defendants Tian and Xing drove a black BYD sedan with the license plate number N××××× from a certain city to Xikou Village, Xikou Primary School in this town. Defendant Xing was responsible for keeping watch, while Defendant Tian stole two sets of hydraulic pump regulators (including one regulator, one solenoid proportional valve, and one pipe head) from a Komatsu SK210LC-8 hydraulic excavator owned by Liu. The total value was 8,321 RMB. After the incident, the police recovered all the stolen goods and returned them to the victim Liu. Tian's family has compensated Liu for his economic loss and received his understanding. On November 9, 2016, Defendant Xing voluntarily turned himself in to the police and truthfully confessed his criminal actions, further assisting the police in arresting another suspect. These facts were undisputed by the defendants Tian and Xing during the trial. There are also statements from the victim Liu, testimony from the witness Zhao, as well as evidence such as the police’s seizure warrant, seizure list and photos, return list, identification record and photos, on-site inspection record, site diagram and photos, evidence receipt and receipt, copy of qualification certificate, copy of sales contract, receipt, letter of understanding, price appraisal conclusion, video disc, certificate of meritorious behavior, and related materials. Additionally, there are the police records taken when Xing turned himself in, the narrative of how they came to be apprehended, the arrest process, and household registration proof of the defendants Tian and Xing. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xing": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The local People's Procuratorate alleges: In July and August 2015, Liao and Zhou (who are being handled in separate cases) instructed Wang1 (also handled in a separate case) and others to transport stones down from the quarry, located in \"Some Place\" in a certain area, in order to gain shares in Liu's quarry. This resulted in two conflicts with local villagers. On August 14, 2015, at around 1 p.m., Liao learned that the Sangtian Police Station was seeking information from Liu and related villagers regarding the conflicts, and thus gathered defendants Jie, Yu, and others to take two cars to the entrance of the Sangtian Police Station one after another, where they engaged in a dispute and fought with the local villagers. Jie, Yu, and the others, wielding wooden sticks, injured victims Zhao and Qiu before fleeing the scene by car. After evaluation, Zhao's physical injury was classified as minor injury of the second degree, and Qiu's was classified as slight injury. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution read out and presented in court the defendants' basic information, explanations of their arrest, testimonies from witnesses Liu, Zeng, and others, statements from victims Zhao and Qiu, the confessions and defenses of defendants Jie and Yu, forensic assessment opinions, identification records, and confessions and defenses from co-defendants Liao, Zhou, Wang1, and Wang2.", "label": {"Jie": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Gao and An agreed to go to the market to steal. At around 9 a.m. on September 2, 2013, near the entrance of the morning market on Linyuan Road in the Xinshi District of a certain city, defendant An was responsible for covering, while defendant Gao stole the handbag of Wang, who was buying children's clothing, and placed it in the basket of Gao's bicycle. After defendants Gao and An were apprehended, Wang's handbag was found in Gao's bicycle basket, which contained 175 yuan in cash and a Samsung mobile phone. According to the Xinshi District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen mobile phone was valued at 396 yuan. It was also found that the Samsung mobile phone, 175 yuan in cash, keys, discount cards, and cartoon cloth handbag seized in this case had been returned to the victim by the public security organs. The above facts were not contested by defendants Gao and An during the court hearing and were confirmed by the victim Wang's statement, the seizure documents, the return list, the price appraisal conclusion of the involved items from a certain province, criminal file records from Dingzhou Prison, proof of Gao’s previous offenses from the Yanzhuang Police Station of Qingyuan County Public Security Bureau, Gao's release materials, residency information proof of Gao and An, the statement regarding An's situation from the Wudaoku Police Station of Yichun City Public Security Bureau, criminal judgments (2007) No. 191 and (2004) No. 137 from Qingyuan County People's Court of a certain province, documentation on the arrest and case-solving process, the criminal judgment of the Xinshi District Court of a certain city, and the criminal ruling of the Intermediate People’s Court of a certain city, An’s release materials, and other evidence, are sufficient to establish (the facts).", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "An": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Shandong Province charges that the defendants Gao and Wei carried out a robbery on a day in September 2013 at around 18:00. The two drove a two-wheeled motorcycle to the south side of the bridge at the Linqing Hotel on the midsection of Xinhua Road in a certain city and snatched 100 yuan in cash and a mobile phone valued at 419 yuan from a woman. After committing the crime, the stolen mobile phone was kept by Gao for personal use. The defendants Yang and Gao, either acting together or in conjunction with others, during the period from September to November 2013, rode a two-wheeled motorcycle three times successively and robbed victims Xue, Jiang, and Chen of property worth 7025 yuan at different locations: the road in front of the Gulou Bridge East gas station on Qingnian Road, the embankment of the Zhangwei River, and the road in front of the \"Qiuhai Tobacco, Alcohol, and Food\" store on Longshan Road. After the incident, the stolen property was returned to the victims. On November 6, 2013, at about 18:00, defendant Yang, along with others, rode a two-wheeled motorcycle near the Longqingyuan residential area on Longshan Road in a certain city and snatched 2170 yuan in cash from Cao. On the afternoon of November 25, 2013, at around 18:00, while defendants Yang and Gao were preparing to commit a robbery near a hotel in a certain city, they were apprehended by public security authorities.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on December 13, 2016, at around 9 PM, defendants Kai, Qian, and Zhao went to the grain and oil store located at XX North Alley, Qitai Road, in a certain city. Defendant Kai pried open the door lock, and the three entered the store and stole 25 kilograms of plum pepper from a city in a certain place from the shelves. After appraisal, the stolen plum pepper from a city in a certain place was valued at 3000 yuan. The stolen goods were sold and the proceeds squandered. Defendants Kai, Qian, and Zhao have no objections to the facts and charges alleged by the prosecution, nor do they have any defense opinions. Upon investigation, it was found that on December 13, 2016, at around 9 PM, defendants Kai, Qian, and Zhao scouted the location in advance and went to the victim Wang's grain and oil store located at XX North Alley, Qitai Road, in a certain city. Defendant Kai pried open the door lock, and the three entered the store and stole 25 kilograms of plum pepper from a city in a certain place from the shelves. The stolen goods were sold and the proceeds squandered. After appraisal, the stolen plum pepper from a city in a certain place was valued at 3000 yuan. These facts are corroborated by the confessions of defendants Kai, Qian, and Zhao to the investigative authorities, the victim Wang's report materials and statements, the appraisal conclusion of the involved items, the list of seized and returned items, identification records, photographs of the scene identification, the incident process, and the population information form, all of which mutually confirm and are sufficient to verify the charges.", "label": {"Kai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 11:00 on March 31, 2016, defendants Li and Chang, along with others, conspired and divided tasks beforehand to steal 3,600 yuan from Wu's handbag. This occurred at the foot massage shop they operated, located east of the railway bridge on Jiangping Road in this city. After being apprehended, defendants Li and Chang confessed truthfully to their crimes. The Jingjiang City Public Security Bureau lawfully seized the stolen 3,600 yuan and has since returned it to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Chang, or their defense during the court hearing. They are corroborated by the victim Wu's statement, photos of mobile communication records, the seizure order, lists of seized and returned items, photos and video discs of the seized items, surveillance video discs and descriptions from roads near the crime scene, the police work log, the arrest process, and basic information on registered residents, which are sufficient to confirm the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Between October and November 2013, defendants Liu and Yan, together with \"Xiao Moumou\" (currently at large) and others, in order to seek illegal profits, opened a casino near the Wang Family Ancestral Hall in a village in Jiulonghu Town, Zhenhai District, attracting individuals like He, Wu, Tang and others to gamble, illegally taking in profits totaling over 20,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Liu provided cut-taking services for the casino and illegally profited over 3,000 RMB. Defendant Yan provided management and lookout services for the casino during this period and illegally profited over 700 RMB. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Liu and Yan during the court trial, and are corroborated by documentary evidence such as identification of the defendants, arrest records, explanations, and the testimonies of witnesses including He, Xu, and Tang, identification records, and other evidence, sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county accused the defendants Wang and Fan of X crime based on the following facts: In 2009, the defendant Wang held a traditional wedding with Liu A and registered their marriage on March 15, 2016. They have a son and a daughter after marriage. In 2008, the defendant Fan held a traditional wedding with Wen 1 and registered their marriage on June 8, 2012. They have two sons. In 2016, Wang met Fan, and on the 14th of the 3rd lunar month in 2017 (Fan's birthday), they officially established a romantic relationship. From that time until January or February 2019, they lived together as husband and wife at Liu's residence in a certain county. During this period, Fan was pregnant and later, accompanied by Wang, had an abortion at a hospital.\n\nWang's criminal facts: The victim, Li 1, and the defendant Wang were friends, and Li frequently visited the home rented by Wang and Fan. Around March 2019, Fan no longer wished to live together with Wang and moved out of the rented house in some street. Soon after, Fan began living together with Li 1. Upon learning about this, Wang became dissatisfied and repeatedly sought out Fan to resolve their emotional entanglements.\n\nOn July 2, 2019, Wang contacted Fan again to meet and asked Fan to bring Li 1 to the vicinity of the South River Bridge in the county town. Around midnight, Li 1 drove to the bridge head and saw Wang holding a vegetable knife with Fan. Wang walked to the front of Li 1's car with the knife in han", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: On March 23, 2015, defendants Fu and Luo conspired with \"A\" and \"He A\" (both at large, handled in separate cases) to engage in making and distributing prostitution cards, soliciting business by phone, transporting prostitutes, and collecting fees for acts of prostitution. They introduced prostitution to others on three occasions, as follows: 1. At approximately 9:30 p.m. on March 23, 2015, defendants Fu and Luo, in collaboration with \"A\" and \"He A,\" arranged for prostitute Zhai to engage in prostitution with client Jiang in room 8416 of a Super 8 hotel located in a certain town in this city. 2. At approximately 10:00 p.m. on March 23, 2015, defendants Fu and Luo, in collaboration with \"A\" and \"He A,\" arranged for prostitute He to engage in prostitution with client Fang in room 8606 of the Romantic Business Hotel located in a certain town in this city. 3. At approximately 10:00 p.m. on March 23, 2015, defendants Fu and Luo, in collaboration with \"A\" and \"He A,\" arranged for prostitute Zhai to engage in prostitution with client Yang in room 8606 of the Romantic Business Hotel located in a certain town in this city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Fu and Luo during the trial, and are corroborated by: personal information, household registration evidence, detailed drug user apprehension information, evidence preservation list, seizure list, call logs, WeChat chat records, deluxe apartment rental contract, vehicle records, a city's sexually transmitted disease diagnosis report, an administrative penalty decision, a province's fine and confiscation receipt; testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Jiang, Yang, Zhai, Fang, and He; accounts of arrests and situation explanations provided by investigation officers of the public security agency; identification records and photos, inspection records and site photos; confessions and defenses of defendants Fu and Luo, among other evidence, which is sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 2 PM on June 20, 2015, defendants Zhou and Miao went to the area below Building 4 in District C of the Xinhai Jiayuan Community in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Miao acted as a lookout while defendant Zhou sneaked into the home of the victim, Sang Jia, in apartment ＊ and stole a white Apple laptop computer (valued at RMB 5,839 according to appraisal). On June 24 and 25, 2015, defendants Miao and Zhou were subsequently apprehended by the police. The facts ascertained during the trial were consistent with those alleged by the prosecution. It was further found that after defendants Zhou and Miao were apprehended by the police, a white Apple laptop computer was recovered and returned to the victim, Sang Yi. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Miao during the trial. The facts are corroborated by evidence including on-site inspection records, site diagrams and photos, site identification photos, a price appraisal report on the involved items, a list of seized and returned items, household registration proof, an account of the apprehension, prior records, victim statements by Sang Yi and Jiang, and testimony from the witness, Wu, as well as identification records, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Miao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taiyuan City charges that on February 6, 2015, at approximately 14:00, near the \"Mosque\" on Jiefang Road in a certain district of this city, the defendant Sa, on the grounds that victim A-C and others were also operating barbecue stalls in the area, seriously affecting the business of A-B, gathered defendants Ru, Ai, Mai, and others, who, armed with iron stools and wooden sticks, assaulted victims A-A, A-D, A-E, and Di. According to the appraisal, the injuries of victims A-A, A-D, and A-E were all classified as minor injuries. In support of the above allegations, the prosecution has submitted to the court evidence including the defendants' confessions, victims' reports, defendants' statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and appraisal reports. Accordingly,", "label": {"Sa": ["Imprisonment"], "Ru": ["Imprisonment"], "Ai": ["Imprisonment"], "Mai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county accuses that on the afternoon of September 5, 2019, defendants Cao and Hu drove their own Volkswagen car to the construction site at Longhao, a certain town in the northern part of the county. With the assistance of defendant Chen, they stole aluminum alloy building materials and sold them to a recycling station at 8.5 yuan per jin, obtaining 170 yuan. At around 7 p.m. on September 5, 2019, defendants Cao, Hu, and Chen again drove their Volkswagen car to the construction site at Longhao, a certain town, and stole aluminum alloy building materials, selling them to a recycling station at 8.5 yuan per jin, obtaining 205 yuan. At around 8 p.m. on September 6, 2019, when defendants Cao, Hu, and Chen went a third time to the construction site at Longhao, a certain town, to steal aluminum alloy building materials, they were discovered by the construction workers who then called the police. The illicit gains of 375 yuan from the sale by defendants Cao, Hu, and Chen were all obtained by defendant Cao. According to the assessment, the value of the aluminum alloy building materials stolen by the three defendants was 1,811 yuan. To substantiate the above accusations, the prosecution presented in court physical evidence including a Volkswagen Jetta car and the stolen aluminum alloy materials; documentary evidence such as the report of the crime, the account of the incident, household registration certificates, etc.; witness testimony from a person named Gao; the statement of the victim, Sun; confessions and defenses of defendants Cao, Hu, and Chen; the price evaluation conclusion issued by the Price Appraisal Center of a certain county; the transcripts of inspections, identifications, and on-site investigations legally produced by the Public Security Bureau of a certain county; and the letter of understanding.", "label": {"Cao": ["Fine"], "Hu": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on August 14, 2020, defendants Wang and Bai purchased a gray agricultural vehicle with license plate number E** and brand xx from an xx automobile sales company in a certain town for 6,000 yuan. The following day, Wang and Bai, carrying tools such as ropes, bamboo poles, pliers, and tarps, drove the purchased agricultural vehicle to the collective pasture of the xx Gacha of xx Sumu in New Barag Left Banner. Using pliers, they cut through the wire fence and used bamboo poles and ropes to steal six red and red-and-white cattle belonging to victims Xing, Tang, Wang1, and Na. They then transported the cattle to Wang's home in a certain town, where Wang entrusted the six cattle to Bao for caretaking. On August 29, 2020, Wang and Bai, carrying ropes, bamboo poles, pliers, tarps, and other tools, drove the agricultural vehicle to Man's pasture in the xx Gacha of xx Sumu, New Barag Left Banner. They used pliers to cut open the wire fence and bamboo poles and ropes to steal four red-and-white and yellow-and-white cattle belonging to victim Man. They transported the cattle to Wang's home in a certain town and later dyed one of the yellow-and-white cattle black and white. According to the assessment, the value of the ten stolen cattle was 106,500 yuan. Defendant Wang was summoned by the police on September 5, 2020, and truthfully confessed the above facts. Defendant Bai turned himself in to a certain banner's public security bureau on September 6, 2020, and truthfully", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 8:40 PM on June 11, 2018, defendants Yu and Chen sold 1 package of white crystals and 3 red tablets to Liu for RMB 200 at No. 59, Lower Pier, Danshui Pool, Jiang'an District, in a certain city. They were caught on the spot by police officers. The police seized the drugs and drug money at the scene and found 1 red tablet at Yu's residence. Upon examination, the seized white crystals and red tablets were identified as the drug methamphetamine, with a total weight of 0.51 grams.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: In June 2014, defendant Zhang proposed and conspired with defendant Tang, agreeing to defraud Zhenjiang Chengji Real Estate Development Company of cemetery relocation fees by faking graves. Defendant Zhang arranged for defendant Zhu to purchase urns and other items, and had him, together with defendant Chen, dig holes in Chen's vegetable garden and bury them, fabricating the graves of the fictitious \"Chang Delin\" and \"Chang B.\" On June 26, 2014, taking advantage of his role in assisting Zhenjiang Chengji Real Estate Development Company with cemetery relocations, defendant Zhang had defendant Tang impersonate the friend of the fictitious grave owner's son \"Chang A,\" witnessed by defendant Zhang, and signed a cemetery relocation agreement with Zhenjiang Chengji Real Estate Development Company, defrauding the company of 46,000 yuan. Defendant Zhang received 13,000 yuan, defendant Tang received 10,000 yuan, defendant Zhu received 15,000 yuan, and defendant Chen received 8,000 yuan. On August 11, 2014, the police apprehended defendants Zhang and Tang, and subsequently, defendant Zhang assisted the police in apprehending defendants Zhu and Chen. After the incident, the aforementioned stolen money was seized by the police and returned to the victimized company. The prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Zhang, Tang, Zhu, and Chen constitute the crime of X, and that defendant Zhang has shown meritorious service and may be given a lighter punishment according to law. Defendants Tang, Zhu, and Chen are regarded as accomplices and should be given lighter punishment according to law. The court is advised to punish the four defendants in accordance with the provisions of Articles X, X, X, X, X, X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang, Tang, Zhu, and Chen in court, with confessions and defenses of the four defendants read and presented in court and cross-examined, statements from staff member Song of the victimized company, testimonies from witnesses Wu, Yin and others, police documentation of the incident and apprehension process, item seizure and return lists, bank account statements, site photographs, the agreement, undertakings, grave information registration forms, explanations, identification transcripts and other evidence verifying them. It is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges that on March 23, 2013, at approximately 19:20, the defendant Hu, with the assistance of the defendant Lu, having contacted in advance, sold three packets of methamphetamine (with a total net weight of 2.6765 grams), placed inside a cigarette box, to an individual named Zhu (to be dealt with in a separate case) at the entrance of a quick hotel in Rongjia Village, Zhangqi Town, of the city in question for a price of 1000 RMB. The police apprehended defendants Hu and Lu at the scene, and from Zhu they seized three packets of suspected drugs. Chemical testing and identification confirmed that the seized crystals contained methamphetamine. After being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Lu truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial process, defendants Hu and Lu raised no objections to the facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu and Zhou, identification records and photographs, lists and photographs of seized items, drug submission lists, detailed call records, public security administrative penalty decisions, the criminal judgment from this court, physical and chemical examination identification reports, records of capture, arrest records, and identity documentation of the two defendants. There is sufficient evidence to establish the facts. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances mentioned above, the public prosecution suggests a sentencing range for defendant Hu of one to two years of fixed-term imprisonment, along with a fine; it suggests a sentencing range for defendant Lu of six months to one year and six months of fixed-term imprisonment, along with a fine.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. Defendants Wei and Zhuang rode a motorcycle to Caishi Street at the Sanba Office in Yongqiao District, Suzhou City around 10 a.m. on March 31, 2015. They falsely claimed to be community committee staff members handling low-income subsidies for residents and needed to register and take photos of Fan, who was buying vegetables. Believing them, the victim Fan followed Wei and Zhuang to a courtyard at Qishierchu. The defendants Wei and Zhuang said that earrings needed to be removed for the photo to avoid reflection and tried to take Fan's earrings but were discovered. The defendants then used violence, such as covering Fan's mouth and holding her hands, to rob her of her earrings. According to the price appraisal, the robbed gold earrings were valued at 1548 RMB. 2. Defendants Wei and Zhuang rode a motorcycle to the entrance of the workers' village club of Taoyuan Mine in Yongqiao District, Suzhou City around 10 a.m. on April 15, 2015, where they saw the victim Li and claimed to be community committee staff members handling low-income subsidies, requiring a photo. Li believed them. The defendants took Li by motorcycle to a place near \"Paradise\" of Taoyuan Mine and said earrings needed to be removed for the photo. They tried to take Li's earrings but were discovered. The defendants grasped Li's hands to prevent resistance and robbed her of her gold earrings. According to the price appraisal, the gold earrings were valued at 913 RMB. 3. Defendants Wei and Zhuang rode a motorcycle near a town government in Yongqiao District, Suzhou City around 10 a.m. on May 3, 2015, where they saw Liu. They claimed to be staff handling low-income subsidies and said a photo was needed. Liu believed them. The defendants took Liu by motorcycle to a secluded place near a school in Qixian. They used verbal threats and held Liu's arm to rob her of her gold earrings. According to the price appraisal, the gold earrings were valued at 874 RMB. To prove the above charges, the prosecution submitted evidence including the confessions and defenses of the defendants, statements of the victims, testimonies of witnesses, and appraisal opinions.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from July 2013 to October 22, 2013, defendants Chen, Jin knowingly engaged in activities on the \"456 Game\" website (http://www.game456.com) and the \"69 Game\" website (http://www.game69.com), which utilized online gaming platforms for network gambling activities. Operating out of Room 611, Building 1, at Jingshan Street, a district in a certain city, they were involved in buying and selling, exchanging virtual game currency \"Silver\" of the aforementioned websites through a buy-low-sell-high approach. They provided fund settlement services for gamblers on the \"456 Game\" and \"69 Game\" websites (commonly known as Silver merchants) and profited from these activities. From September 17, 2013, to October 22, 2013, defendant Pan was hired to assist defendants Chen, Jin in the aforementioned buying, selling, and exchanging of virtual game currency \"Silver\". Investigations revealed that during the period in question, defendants Chen, Jin accumulated a total amount of 4,419,296 yuan by exchanging \"Silver\" and RMB. During the period when defendant Pan was involved, a total amount of 1,707,870 yuan was accumulated. These facts were not contested by defendants Chen, Jin, and Pan during the trial, and they are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Hu, Li, Tan, Zhang, Lin, the search records, the seizure list, the detailed list of bank account transactions, the bank account identity information, the arrest process, and population information, which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged: On July 4, 2013, Chen, through the introduction of Wang, purchased methamphetamine drugs worth 3000 yuan from Lei (already sentenced). Later, Lei asked the defendant Guo to help contact for purchasing methamphetamine and agreed to give Guo a benefit of 500 yuan. On the morning of July 5, 2013, through the introduction arranged by the defendant Guo, Lei purchased two small packages of methamphetamine from Zhou (handled in another case) at Su's home for 2200 yuan. Lei then went to the Chengxi Gas Station in Yiwu City to conduct a transaction with Chen, while defendants Guo and Su kept watch nearby. After Lei completed the drug transaction with Chen near the Chengxi Gas Station in Yiwu City, he was apprehended by police officers. Two small packages of suspected drugs were seized from Chen. Upon examination by the Yiwu Public Security Bureau's Evidence Identification Office, the two seized small packages of transparent, crystalline substances weighed a net 1.63 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine components. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Guo and Su during the trial and were supported by witness testimonies from Lei, Chen, and Jia; acceptance of evidence materials; the Yiwu Public Security Bureau's seizure list; the physical and chemical examination report from the Yiwu Public Security Bureau's Evidence Identification Office; identification transcripts (with photos); scene identification transcripts (with photos); two small packages of suspected transparent crystalline drugs; transfer call record sheets from a certain country; compulsory isolation detoxification decision document; administrative penalty decision document; criminal judgment documents; the apprehension process documentation; and the confessions and identity information of defendants Guo and Su, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On the evening of November 7, 2014, the defendant Wang sold a package of methamphetamine to the defendant Dai for the price of 600 yuan at his temporary residence located at No. 15, Building 17, Fengtai Community, Shuixin Street, Lucheng District, a certain city. After the arrest of the defendant Wang, the police found six packages of crystalline drugs, one package of gray powder drugs, and one package of black powder drugs at his aforementioned temporary residence. Upon identification, the weights of these drugs were 5.18 grams, 0.21 grams, and 0.33 grams, respectively, all containing methamphetamine components. 2. At about 8:00 PM on November 11, 2014, the defendant Dai sold a package of drugs to Peng for the price of 200 yuan in a small alley off Lane 9, Wanxia Road, Qianyuan Village, Louqiao Street, Ouhai District, a certain city, and was subsequently apprehended by the police. On the same day, the police found a bottle containing a mixture of crystalline substances and red pills, as well as a package of crystalline drugs at the defendant Dai's residence, which is located at No. 9, Lane 8, Wanxia Road, Qianyuan Village, Louqiao Street, Ouhai District, the same city. Upon identification, the drugs used by defendant Dai for transactions weighed 0.40 grams, and the seized drugs weighed 7.80 grams and 0.45 grams, all containing methamphetamine components. After the incident, the defendant Dai assisted the police in apprehending another perpetrator. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Dai during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimony of witnesses Xu and Peng, search records, seizure orders, inventory lists, confiscated items lists, physico-chemical examination reports, cell phone call records, criminal judgment documents, information forms of lawbreakers, administrative punishment decisions, statements of circumstances, the course of capture, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: In November 2015, the defendant Zhu, with the intent of making a profit, rented a three-room storefront along a certain river in a certain county to operate a gaming hall, providing gaming machines with gambling functions for others to engage in gambling. During the operation of this gambling gaming hall, the defendant Dong knew that Zhu had set up the gambling gaming hall, yet still assisted with accounting for the gambling hall and provided coding services for the gambling machines. At around 22:00 on January 28, 2016, the gambling gaming hall was raided by public security authorities, and 8 \"Six Lions Dynasty Machines\" (upright connecting machines) and 2 \"Fishing Machines\" (eight-player tabletop machines) were seized on-site. After inspection and verification by the Public Security Management Brigade of a certain county police department, it was determined that the 2 sets of gaming machines seized, totaling 10 units, all had gambling functions. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by the following evidence, which has been cross-examined and authenticated in court: 1. Decision to initiate a case, case-solving process, arrest process, household registration certificate, Criminal Judgment No. 00198 (2014) of Hu Criminal First Instance, WeChat content screenshots; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Du, Li, Zhang, Chu, Zhang A, and Lei; 3. Confessions of defendants Zhu and Dong; 4. Identification records and photos; 5. Opinion letter from the public security bureau of a certain county regarding the identification of facilities and equipment of the gaming hall along a certain river in a certain county. These are sufficient to reach a determination. The defense counsel, Fu, suggested that defendant Zhu voluntarily pleaded guilty in court; has consistently shown good behavior and is a first-time offender; the circumstances of the crime were relatively minor, the operation time of the gambling establishment was short, and the social harm was minimal. It is recommended that Zhu be given a lighter penalty.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On November 4, 2014, at approximately 21:40, the defendants Liu and Liao, under the instruction of another person (to be handled in a separate case), went to Room 505 of the Yalanda Hotel in Daxi Town of this city, and sold a package of drugs to Yuan at a price of 1,500 RMB. After the transaction was completed, they were apprehended by officers from the Hengfeng Police Station of the Wenling Public Security Bureau at the hotel staircase. Upon identification, the item used in the transaction tested positive for heroin with a net weight of 1.88 grams. After being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Liao both truthfully confessed to the facts of their involvement in the case. During the court hearing, the defendants Liu and Liao did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the testimony of witness Yuan, household registration certificates, the seizure order, the drug surrender list, explanatory statements, photographic evidence, call records, the certificate of capture, the physical evidence examination report, inspection records, identification records, and the mobile phone used in the crime, among other evidence, which are sufficient for establishing the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that at around 6 p.m. on March 24, 2020, defendants Wu and Duan, while on their way home from work, noticed the channel steel beside the road near the Xinxiwang Pig Farm at Yantaishan Community, Hongfeng Village, Beitan Town, Jingyuan County. Defendant Duan proposed to secretly steal it, and Wu agreed. The two then went home, and Wu called upon defendant Wang, who was residing at Wu’s home. After the three discussed the plan, at around 9 p.m., Wang drove Wu's \"Futian\" brand light truck with license plate number ×××. The three drove to Xinxiwang Pig Farm and stole 9 pieces of channel steel from the roadside before fleeing in the vehicle. After being discovered and pursued by people from the pig farm, the three abandoned the vehicle and escaped. According to the Jingyuan County Price Appraisal Service Center, the stolen channel steel was valued at 2,430 RMB. After the incident, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the owner. The public prosecution agency submitted documentary evidence including household registration documents, an explanation of the arrest situation, a statement of illegal and criminal history, extraction traces, evidence registration form, seizure list and return list, evidence receipt list, among others; testimonies from witnesses Kou, Liu, Zhou, Xia, Song, and Xu; the statement of victim Zhang; the confessions of defendants Wu, Duan, and Wang; the Jingyuan County Price Appraisal Service Center's Pricing Appraisal Conclusion No. 14 [2020]; site photos, oriented site sketches and layout diagrams; site inspection records, and identification records as evidence.", "label": {"Wu": ["Fine"], "Duan": ["Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused: At around 10 a.m. on February 7, 2014, defendants Zhong and Zhou, after premeditation, went to the San Yan Qiao bus stop in Hecheng District, Huaihua City. Defendant Zhou first boarded a Route 1 bus heading toward the train station and intentionally blocked passengers behind him who wanted to board and pay the fare. Defendant Zhong then took the opportunity to employ close-proximity pickpocketing tactics to steal a wallet containing 600 RMB in cash from the victim Huang, who had boarded the bus. Afterwards, Zhong and Zhou divided the stolen money between them, taking 200 RMB and 400 RMB respectively.\n\nUpon examination, it was found that the People's Procuratorate's charge against defendants Zhong and Zhou for theft was clear and that the main facts were consistent, which this court confirms. It was further established that during the court proceedings, defendant Zhong returned 200 RMB and defendant Zhou returned 400 RMB of the stolen money. These facts were not contested by defendants Zhong and Zhou during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to support them, including audio-visual materials on a surveillance video disc, documentary evidence of the defendants' household registration, details of the case, an explanation of the surveillance video, the defendants' previous criminal judgments, release certificates, inspection records from Hecheng Branch of Huaihua Public Security Bureau, defendant identification of the scene records, the court’s inventory of seized items and documents, the statement from the victim Huang, testimonies of witnesses He and He, the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhong and Zhou, photos of the defendants identifying the scene, site inspection records, location diagrams of the scene, and scene photographs.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: 1. On the evening of October 7, 2013, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of \"San Gong,\" making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. 2. On the evening of the 9th of the same month, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of \"San Gong,\" making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. 3. On the evening of the 10th of the same month, defendants Qiao and Yang, together with Yang A, Qiao C, Ma, Liu, and others, opened a casino at No. 1-202, Lane 506, Huancheng West Road, Zhongdai Street, Pinghu City. They gathered Qiao B, He, Wang, and others to gamble using the method of \"San Gong,\" making a profit of 2,500 yuan from the rake. It was also found that after defendant Qiao was brought to justice, he truthfully confessed his crimes and contacted his brother Qiao A by phone to persuade defendant Yang to surrender. Subsequently, defendant Yang surrendered at the Zhongdai Police Station of the Pinghu City Public Security Bureau on March 7, 2014. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by defendants Qiao and Yang during the trial, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, the criminal judgment, situation explanations, capture process, and identification documents, which are sufficient for the finding.", "label": {"Qiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: 1. On a day in July 2014, defendant Liu allowed Liu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. 2. On September 11, 2014, defendant Liu allowed Liu and Cheng to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room 611 of GreenTree Inn, located at the intersection of a certain road and Jinsan Road in a certain district of a certain city. 3. On a day in early September 2014, defendant Cheng allowed Liu and Wang to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. 4. On September 10, 2014, defendant Cheng allowed Liu to use methamphetamine (ice) in Room **, Building 2, Lian'an Modern City, at the intersection of a certain road and Taoran Road in a certain district of a certain city. In response to the above charges, the public prosecution agency presented evidence to the court, including witness testimonies, the confessions of the defendants, and related documentary evidence.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a district in a certain city charged that at around 4 a.m. on April 27, 2016, the defendants Hao and Zhang took advantage of the absence of people to steal an electric tricycle worth 1,600 yuan, which was parked by the victim, Bian, in front of the lottery shop at the east gate of the Jingmo Shuxiang Yayuan residential community in a district of a certain city.", "label": {"Hao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou accused: On the evening of July 22, 2014, at around 10 pm, the defendants Wen and Xu, along with others, were drinking near the Northeast Specialty BBQ Restaurant on Crescent Road in Triangle Village, Qiaosi Street, a district in Hangzhou. Without cause, they surrounded the victim Zhang's white Beijing Hyundai Elantra, license plate \"Zhe A×××××\". They forcibly compelled the victim Zhang to exit the vehicle by methods such as banging on the car. During this incident, the defendant Xu climbed onto the roof of the car and smashed the sunroof. Fearing physical assault, the victim Zhang abandoned the car and fled. Subsequently, the defendants Wen, Xu, and others used methods such as kicking and hitting with sticks to damage the car's front and rear windshields, the right rear window, hood, and trunk. According to an assessment, the value of the damaged property amounted to RMB 6,220. After the incident, defendants Xu and Xiong have compensated the victim Zhang with RMB 50,000 and obtained his understanding.", "label": {"Wen": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that from September 2011 to October 2012, the defendants Li and Cao conspired in advance to organize gambling activities. They set up a gaming room near the old grain and oil station in Nanxun Town, a certain district of this city, where they organized participants, including Deng, Hong, Chen, Xu, and others, to gamble in the form of \"Er Ba Gang.\" They took a commission of 10% of the winnings from the bank, totaling 300,000 RMB. After the incident, the defendant Cao voluntarily went to the public security authorities to surrender and truthfully confessed his crimes. The facts above were not disputed by the defendants Li and Cao during the trial. The evidence, including household registration certificates, public security administrative penalty decision documents, revocation of public security administrative penalty decision documents, explanatory notes, testimonies from witnesses Deng, Hong, Chen, Xu, and others, as well as the circumstances of the arrest, sufficiently supports these findings.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In October 2011, the defendant Wang, despite knowing it might be stolen property, purchased a used Santana 2000 sedan with military license plates for 8,500 yuan from others. Subsequently, the defendant Ning, also knowing it might be stolen property, bought the car from Wang for 13,500 yuan. Later, the car was seized by the police. Investigation revealed that the car was indeed stolen. It was further found that after investigators discovered that the Santana driven by Ning's father (referred to as Ning's father A) was stolen, the vehicle was detained. Later, defendant Ning turned himself in at the Pengyang police station of the Zhoucun branch of Zibo Public Security Bureau, while defendant Wang was apprehended by the investigating authorities. The involved Santana 2000 sedan (engine number 651769) was seized by the investigative authorities and returned to the victim. The defendants Wang and Ning raised no objections during the trial regarding these facts, which were confirmed by evidence such as the vehicle sales agreement, testimonies from witnesses including Li, statements from the victim Qu, and confessions from the defendants Wang and Ning, sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ning": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At approximately 5 a.m. on June 25, 2016, the defendants Chen and Xu, while staying at the dormitory located at Room 403, Building 4, Area A, Nanyou, Jiannan Road, Nanshan District, a certain city, acted as lookouts for each other. Chen stole a mobile OPPO phone from their roommate, the victim Deng, while Xu stole an iPhone 6 from another roommate, the victim Liu, and then they fled the scene. At around 9 a.m. on the same day, Chen and Xu sold the stolen iPhone 6 to an individual named Ma for RMB 1,250. At around 4 p.m. on the same day, Chen and Xu were arrested at Room 205, Jiahua Hotel, Xinwei Community, Baoan District, a certain city, and the stolen OPPO mobile phone was also recovered. On June 29 of the same year, with Chen's cooperation, the stolen iPhone 6 was retrieved. According to the appraisal, the stolen iPhone 6 was valued at 2,655 yuan, the OPPO mobile phone at 2,570 yuan, and the OPPO phone case at 25 yuan, totaling 5,250 yuan. On July 14, 2016, the defendant Xu received forgiveness from the victims Deng and Liu. The facts above, which the defendants Chen and Xu did not dispute during the court hearing, are supported by evidence such as photographs of the stolen mobile phones, explanations of the arrest process, explanations of the retrieval process, seizure decision and list, return list, evidence material acceptance list, letters of forgiveness, identity materials of the defendants, testimony of witness Ma, statements from the victims Deng and Liu, the price appraisal report of the involved properties in a certain city, the scene inspection transcript, the identification transcript of witness Ma, search record, and confessions and defenses of the defendants Chen and Xu, all of which have been verified to be true and are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges that, on the early morning of January 27, 2013, the defendants Chen and Wu, along with Wang Yi (handled in a separate case), Wang Jia (handled in a separate case), and others, were having a late night barbecue at a street stall at the entrance of a commercial city in a certain district, Pinghu Street. During the meal, due to an issue with the volume of noise, the victim Diao, who was seated at the adjacent table, smashed a beer bottle on the ground near Wang Jia, with some fragments hitting Wang Jia. This led to a verbal altercation between the two parties, after which Wang Jia and others left the scene. After leaving, Wang Jia called on Wang Yi and the defendants Chen and Wu, and they retrieved metal pipes from the factory dormitory, returning to the barbecue stall to assault the victim Diao, causing multiple injuries to Diao's head and other areas. The public security authorities arrived at the scene following a report and apprehended the defendants Chen and Wu. According to an assessment, the injuries sustained by the victim Diao resulted in an open fracture of the right temporoparietal bone and rupture of the dura mater, with the injuries assessed as severe. After the incident, the families of Wang Yi, Wang Jia, and the defendant Wu reached a settlement agreement with the victim Diao, compensating the victim Diao for losses with 80,000 RMB. The victim issued a letter of understanding, expressing forgiveness for the actions of the defendants Chen and Wu, and stated they would no longer pursue criminal responsibility against them. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Chen and Wu during the court proceedings and are substantiated by evidence including the capture process, the criminal case settlement agreement, the defendants' identity information, testimonies of witnesses Li, Wang Jia, and Wang Yi, the victim Diao's statement, the confessions of the defendants Chen and Wu, the forensic medical injury assessment report, and the on-site inspection records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: On August 17, 2019, at approximately 10 p.m., the defendants Zhou and Chen, after drinking, were at Xiu Mai KTV, located at No. XXX Miaojing Road, New Town, in the same district. They went to watch officers of the Police Station of a certain area under the Pudong Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, including Officer Yao, handling a dispute. When Officer Yao advised them to leave, defendant Zhou did not comply and interfered with Officer Yao's law enforcement. Officer Yao then orally summoned him, during which defendants Zhou and Chen pushed and pulled Officer Yao, causing him injury. When reinforcing officers, including Guo, arrived, they attempted to remove defendant Zhou but were met with resistance, resulting in injury. According to the assessment: Yao suffered soft tissue contusion in the right forearm due to external force, constituting a minor injury; Guo sustained multiple soft tissue injuries due to external force, which did not constitute a minor injury. On the same day, defendants Chen and Zhou were apprehended by public security authorities and confessed truthfully to the aforementioned criminal facts upon arrival in custody. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhou during the trial. Additionally, the public prosecution authority provided evidence, confirmed as truthful through court examination, including the confession records of defendant Chen, the statements of the victims Yao and Guo, injury notification, injury assessment reports, witness testimonies from Mao, Yan, Jiang, and Cao, site surveillance video, law enforcement recorder video, evidence reception list from the public security authority, police certificate, situation explanations, identity information, and the process of the crime and arrest, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Zhou": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between October and November 2014, the defendants, Tong and Zhu, took items from the Baitang branch of Liaoning Yonghui Supermarket Co., Ltd., located at No. 15 Yangtze Street, Huanggu District, a certain city. They placed the items inside their own bags and left the supermarket through a non-shopping route, stealing Snickers peanut chocolates and other items (with a total value of RMB 940.02) on three separate occasions. The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds squandered. It was further found that when Tong was being investigated for suspected drug use, he voluntarily confessed to the theft and assisted the police in capturing his accomplice, Zhu. During the trial, both defendants actively returned all the stolen funds, totaling 940 yuan. Tong and Zhu had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, which were supported by the testimony of the witness Bai, the criminal judgment and release documents, identification records and photographs, price appraisal report, phone inquiry records and population information, the case source, and the details of the capture. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on June 17, 2020, defendants Jiang and Yang, among others, were drinking and singing in Room 212 of the Ruiru Mansion KTV at XXX Minjing Road in a certain district of this city. Defendant Jiang got into an argument with the victim, Lou, who came to offer a toast. Jiang twice struck Lou with a wine bottle. After Sun and Lou left the room, the victim Dong, who was with Lou, entered Room 212. Jiang mistakenly thought Dong came to fight and thus struck Dong's head with a wine bottle and pursued him with Yang outside the room into the corridor. Afterwards, Jiang and Yang were persuaded to return to the room by others. Later, when Lou entered Room 212 again, Jiang assaulted Lou, and Yang hit Lou on the head with a wine bottle upon seeing this. Together, they punched and kicked Lou. The forensic examination determined that Lou's facial soft tissue injuries, facial skin abrasions, right eye contusions, and limb soft tissue injuries were all classified as minor injuries, with an overall assessment of minor injury; Dong's scalp wound, facial skin abrasions, and facial skin scratches were also classified as minor injuries, with an overall assessment of minor injury. On September 9, 2020, defendants Yang and Jiang were separately apprehended by the police and brought to justice. Both of them truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts upon arrival. The defendants Jiang and Yang, along with their defense counsel, raised no objections during the trial to these facts, which were confirmed through the victims Lou and Dong's statements and identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Sun and Liu, testimonies of witnesses Song, Tang, and Li, evidence retrieval notices and lists, surveillance videos, law enforcement recorder videos and screenshots, injury examination notice and hospital examination records, judicial identification statement from the Marine Biological Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Judicial Identification Institute, case explanation provided by the Marine Police Bureau Changhai Road Police Station, and defendants Jiang and Yang's confessions and identification records, which provided sufficient evidence for conviction. During the trial, defendants Jiang and Yang, with the help of their relatives, compensated the victims Lou and Dong and received their understanding.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that defendants Yang and Wu agreed to sell drugs for profit. At around 3 p.m. on April 26, 2014, defendant Yang collected two small packets of the drug ketamine, with a total weight of 1.32 grams, from defendant Wu. Later, at the entrance of Jinkeda Plastic Co., Ltd. in Zhangcha District, a certain city, Yang sold the aforementioned ketamine to Xie for 200 RMB. After the transaction was completed, they were apprehended by police. The police recovered 200 RMB in drug money and a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from defendant Yang at the scene, and two small packets of ketamine involved in the transaction were recovered from Xie. Subsequently, with the assistance of defendant Yang, the police arrested defendant Wu near a staff dormitory building at Meijia Decoration Center on Fenglin Road in a certain district of a certain city, and seized a small packet of ketamine weighing 0.85 grams and a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from Wu. The above facts were acknowledged without objection by defendants Yang and Wu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Xie, identification records, photographs, seizure decrees, inventory lists, mobile phone call records, forensic examination reports, the arrest reports, household registration certificates, and confessions and identification records and photographs of defendants Yang and Wu during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 8:00 a.m. on April 13, 2016, defendants Jin and Kong boarded a westbound educational line bus in this city. When the bus was near the Nanshaomen stop, Kong was responsible for blocking the victim Ma's view with his body, while Jin took advantage of Ma's inattention to reach into Ma's shoulder bag and steal 530 yuan. The two were immediately apprehended by officers from the second squad of the Public Transport Division of the Xi'an Municipal Public Security Bureau, who were on the same bus. At the scene, 530 yuan was recovered from the right side of Jin's waist. After the case was solved, the stolen cash was returned to the victim. The evidence establishing the above facts includes: 1. The case registration form and report materials from the public security agency; 2. A certificate of the arrest process issued by the public security agency; 3. The statement of the victim, Ma; 4. The testimony of witness Fan; 5. Identification and pointing ou", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Kong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges: 1. One day in January 2017, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 250 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, a district in Hangzhou. 2. On the afternoon of January 27 of the same year, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Lai for 200 yuan downstairs of Building 2, Unit 2, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. 3. On the afternoon of February 19 of the same year, defendants Li and Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 300 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. 4. On the night of February 21, 2017, defendant Li sold a packet of methamphetamine to Jiang for 300 yuan in a rented room at Building 2, Unit 2, Room x, 43 Chaoyang West Road, Linping Street, in this city district. The evidence used to support the charges includes witness testimonies, documentary evidence, retrieval records, and the defendants' confessions and defenses.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged: At approximately 21:41 on December 26, 2017, at a barbecue place in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district, Wang, Zhang, Fa, Ding, and others were drinking and being too loud, which led to a dispute with the neighboring table of Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, another Han, and others. Subsequently, the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han assaulted Wang, Zhang, Fa, and Ding, causing injuries to the four. Upon assessment, Wang’s facial abrasion was considered a minor injury, and Fa’s left brow wound was also considered a minor injury. On January 17, 2018, the families of the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han compensated the victims Wang and the other three with a total of 25,000 yuan, and the victims forgave the defendants' criminal actions. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhu argued: 1. The victims were at fault for the occurrence of the incident; 2. The defendant Zhu compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their forgiveness; 3. The defendant Zhu truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. In summary, it is recommended to apply probation to defendant Zhu. Upon trial, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People’s Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city were true. It was additionally found that this case was reported by the victims. Defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, and Shen were apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Han surrendered voluntarily. After being brought to justice, defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han all truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. These facts were acknowledged by the defendants Han, Zhu, Zhang, Shen, and another Han during the court hearing, and are sufficiently substantiated by documentary evidence such as receipts, letters of forgiveness, witness testimonies, expert opinions, victim statements by Chen, and defendants' confessions, enough to establish the verdict.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On February 22, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., south of the intersection of Housuo Street and Anqiu Lane in Kuiwen District, Weifang City, Zhang (dealt with in a separate case), suspecting that he had left his wallet containing 5,000 yuan in cash in the taxi driven by Li, license plate Lu G×××××, gathered the defendants Qu, Wen, and Jiang (dealt with in a separate case), among others, to beat Li with wooden sticks and smash the taxi's windows after Li denied it and suggested calling the police. This resulted in injuries to Li and damage to the taxi valued at 5,100 yuan. According to the appraisal, the victim Li suffered external injuries to the head, face, and shoulder, causing multiple soft tissue contusions and fractures of the left eye socket's lower and lateral walls, constituting minor injuries (Grade 1). In response to the above criminal charges, the prosecution has provided the following evidence to the court: documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, expert opinions, identification records, and other evidence.", "label": {"Qu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 1:00 a.m. on May 15, 2014, the defendant Zhou drove his Chang'an van with license plate number SuM××××× along with defendant Shen to a sheep pen at the home of Lu in a certain city. Taking advantage of the opportunity, they stole 17 goats and later transported them to Zhou's sheep pen in a certain town of the same city. According to the appraisal, the 17 goats were valued at 11,526 yuan RMB. After the incident, defendants Shen and Zhou truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Zhou's wife compensated the victim Lu with 18,200 yuan RMB. During the court trial, defendants Zhou and Shen did not contest these facts, which were corroborated by the victim Lu's statement, testimonies from witnesses Shao and Chen, identification records, site investigation records and photographs, a situation explanation issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the price assessment conclusion, the case reporting and solving process issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and Criminal Judgment No. 261 (1994) Dongxinchuzi from this court, among other evidence. The evidence was verified in court and is sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from 2015 to December 25, 2016, the defendant Yang, without a tobacco retail license, sold cigarettes multiple times to the defendant Liu via QQ, involving an amount of 52,305 yuan. Since 2015, the defendant Liu, also without a tobacco retail license, repeatedly purchased cigarettes from the defendant Yang through QQ and then resold them at a markup through WeChat Moments to WeChat friends, including Wang, Zhao, Liu A, among others, involving an amount of 53,760 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Yang during the trial. There is documentary evidence, including the statement of case resolution, online chat records, Alipay transaction details, seizure lists, certifications, phone inquiry records, and household registration documents issued by the Zibo Public Security Bureau Daqiao Police Station for defendant Liu, and by the Dongning Public Security Bureau Guangming Police Station for defendant Yang. Additionally, testimonies from witnesses such as Wang and Li, among others, corroborate the facts, providing sufficient grounds for the determination.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that on the afternoon of January 7, 2015, defendants Liu and He went near the side entrance of Hailin Grocery Store at the Pingnan Town Agricultural Market in a certain county. There, they discovered a red Pearl River motorcycle (license plate number Gui R×××××, valued at 2,360 RMB) belonging to the victim, Ye Mou Yi, which was left unlocked. Seizing the opportunity when no one was paying attention, the two defendants stole the motorcycle. After the crime, the police seized the involved motorcycle and returned it to the victim Ye Mou Yi upon solving the case. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and He during the court hearing. Additionally, evidence such as testimonies from witnesses Lu and Ye Mou Jia, statements from victim Ye Mou Yi, site inspection records, site diagrams and photographs, identification records and photographs, certain exhibits, lists of seized and returned items, price appraisal opinions, lists of received evidence, arrest records, household registration certificates, this court's criminal verdicts (Ping Criminal Trial No. 330 of 2011 and No. 33 of 2014), County Detention Center's certificate of release, Yizhou Prison's release certificate, and SkyNet video screenshots have verified and are sufficient for establishing the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged: On June 26, 2016, at around 10 PM, employees of the management office of Zhu Sheng Garden in the Futian District of this city, Ma and Yang, along with defendants Fang and Huang, had a dispute and physical altercation with employees of the Givenchy Beauty and Hair Salon, including Xu and others, due to the salon's unsanitary conditions. Police officers arrived at the scene to defuse the conflict and took some individuals back to the police station for investigation. Later, defendants Fang and Huang returned to the Givenchy Beauty Salon and engaged in a physical conflict with employees of the salon. Outnumbered, Fang and Huang were forced to retreat outside the store, then Fang returned with a kitchen knife, and the two charged back into the store to chase and attack the others. Salon employee Zhang attempted to seize the knife and suffered a cut on the left hand. During the physical altercation, Zhang also sustained a comminuted fracture at the base of the fifth metacarpal of the right hand, as well as dislocation of the hamate-metacarpal joint with soft tissue injury, which was assessed as minor injury level two. The police arrived after receiving the report and arrested defendants Fang and Huang. Later, defendants Fang and Huang reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhang and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The prosecution presented evidence in court, including the kitchen knife involved in the case (photo); documen", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 2 a.m. on December 18, 2012, the defendants Song, Liu, and Li, along with Luo (handled in a separate case), conspired in advance and drove to Yang's slicing factory in Yang Village, Qiucun Town, Fenghua City. Defendant Liu acted as a lookout and provided support outside while defendants Song, Li and Luo entered the factory by climbing the walls and prying the windows. They stole 600 kilograms of rare earth, valued at 24,000 RMB, which Yang had stored in the factory, using rubber bags for transport. After the incident, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants Song, Liu, and Li had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Yang's statement, witness Chen's testimony, the price appraisal conclusion, identification records and photos, temporary seizure receipts and return certificates, the criminal judgment, the details of the case processing, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the guilt.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province charges that from the second half of 2011 to May 2013, defendants Chen and Liao, in their rented home at No. 284 Guangming New Village, in a certain street of a certain district, used computers and the Alibaba online platform to place orders, purchasing clothing with counterfeit \"JEEP\" trademarks in bulk at low prices from suppliers. They then sold these items through their online stores \"World Taste\" and \"High Style\" on Taobao, with total sales amounting to RMB 107,687, resulting in illegal profits of approximately RMB 40,000. On May 13, 2013, the police seized an additional 150 cotton jackets, 785 pairs of pants, 1,124 casual jackets, and 60 shirts bearing the \"JEEP\" trademark that had not yet been sold, from their rental location. Appraisal confirmed that these seized goods were all infringing items with counterfeit \"JEEP\" trademarks, with a total value of approximately RMB 300,000. It was also found that on November 12, 2013, the Zhenhai Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce imposed an administrative penalty on Chen and Liao for selling items with counterfeit \"JEEP\" trademarks, confiscating 150 cotton jackets, 785 pairs of pants, 1,124 casual jackets, and 60 shirts marked with the \"JEEP\" trademark, and fines amounting to RMB 266,892. Defendants Chen and Liao have already paid a fine of RMB 50,000. During the court hearing, defendants Chen and Liao did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by documentary evidence such as the defendants' identity information, the arrest process, the confiscation list, transaction details, power of attorney, trademark registration certificate, trademark transfer approval, trademark change approval, trademark renewal approval, the administrative penalty decision from the Zhenhai Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce, appraisal opinions, and other evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on the night of September 29, 2013, the defendants Ding and Guan conspired in advance to enter Shaoxing Sanpeng Knitting Co., Ltd., located in a town of a certain district of a certain city, through a window. They stole an HP computer (including a monitor) valued at 2,280 RMB and a Lenovo Jiayue computer (excluding a monitor) valued at 1,805 RMB. On February 11, 2015, at around 12:30 p.m., defendant Ding was apprehended by the police at the entrance of Dongjiang Community in a town of a certain district of a certain city. On the same year, March 11, at around 10:00 p.m., defendant Guan was apprehended by the police in room 321 of the Sihai Business Hotel, Changjiang Road, Changshu City, of a certain province. After the crime, the stolen goods were not recovered. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Guan during the court hearing and are supported by the testimony of witness Huang, the price appraisal report, fingerprint identification report, on-site inspection records, description of the arrest process, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the facts. Other criminal activities of defendants Ding and Guan are confirmed by criminal judgment No. 72 and No. 878 of 2014 of Ningbo Yinzhou District People's Court of a certain province, criminal ruling No. 61 of 2014 of the Zhejiang Ningbo Intermediate People's Court, and certificates of release after serving their sentences.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Guan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that from November 24 to December 1, 2012, the defendants Cai and Dong, together with Chen A, Lu XX (both have been sentenced), and others including \"Ji XX\" organized gambling activities in the form of Pai Gow at Jin'ou Hotel in Lucheng District, and Dong'ou Hotel in Wutian Street, Ouhai District in a certain city, benefiting from taking cuts. More than 20 people participated in the gambling. Wang B (already sentenced) acted as the manager inside the casino, while Xu B and Xu A (both have been sentenced) kept watch for the casino. At about 19:00 on December 1, 2012, the casino was raided by the police, who seized one set of dominoes, unattended gambling funds amounting to 26,630 RMB, and a pair of walkie-talkies at the scene. On January 9, 2014, defendants Cai and Dong voluntarily surrendered themselves to the police and truthfully confessed their own criminal facts and those of their accomplices. The above facts were uncontested by defendants Cai and Dong during the trial, and were corroborated by the confessions of accomplices Xu B, Chen A, Lu XX, Wang B, and Xu A; testimonies of witnesses Huang, Liu, Jiang, Wang A, Wei XX, Li Jia, Liu, Chen, Wang C, Zhu, Guo, Jiang, Fang, Sun, and Li Yi; identification records; lists and photographs of seized items; site photos; case summary; criminal judgments of accomplices; identification materials of the two defendants, among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Baotou City charged that on the evening of August 17, 2019, defendants Liu, Li, and Ma (dealt with in a separate case) went to a karaoke venue in a certain district after drinking to sing. During this time, defendants Liu, Li, and Ma randomly attacked KTV staff members, namely the victims Gao, Xu, Niu, and Yuan, causing multiple injuries to their bodies. According to the forensic assessment, the injuries sustained by victims Gao and Xu were classified as minor injuries. After the victims reported to the police, officers Ling and Qiao, along with auxiliary police officers Wang, Ru, and Gao from a local police station, arrived at the scene of the incident. Defendants Li and Ma continued to assault victims Gao and Xu. When the police officers attempted to intervene, defendants Li and Ma insulted and grabbed them, resulting in various injuries to responding officers Ling, Ru, Gao, and Wang. The police brought defendants Liu, Li, and Ma back to the station for questioning and allowed their families to take them home afterward. Once the case was transferred to the criminal investigation team, the public security authorities notified defendants Li and Liu by phone to come to the public security agency for investigation, to which they voluntarily complied. In response to the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented photographs showing the victims' injuries, basic information on the permanent residents, details of the incident's reporting, filing, investigation process, the criminal judgments and administrative penalty decisions for defendants Li and Liu, materials regarding the police measures taken against defendant Ma, explanatory notes from public security organs, testimonies from witnesses Tong and Qiao, statements from victims Gao, Xu, Ru, Ling, Wang, and Gao, confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Liu, forensic body injury assessment reports numbered [2019] 31 and [2019] 32 from the Certain District Branch of Baotou Public Security Bureau's Department of Criminal Forensic Science, identification records of defendants Li, Liu, and victims Gao and Xu, and surveillance video from the crime scene as evidence.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On September 10, 2014, at around 10:00 a.m., the defendants Li and Liang, together with Liang Wen, Liang Ai, Liang Guo, Liang Sheng, Zhou Ming (all of whom have been sentenced), and Huang Cong (handled in a separate case), Liang Wu, Li Long, \"Boss Hong,\" \"Big-bellied Lin,\" \"Thin Ghost\" (handled in another case), and more than ten others, successively went to the sales office of Zhonghao Real Estate Company (hereinafter referred to as Zhonghao Company), located at No. 9, Green Island Plaza, Green Island Street, Encheng, a certain city. Inside the sales office and on the street outside, they randomly assaulted Zhonghao Company personnel and damaged items on site. As a result, the victims Luo, X, and X were injured (all of whom were diagnosed as having minor injuries by forensic identification), and items such as mobile phones, desks, fans, and wooden doors at the scene were damaged (the total value of the damaged items was appraised to be 2,608.48 RMB).", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on June 25, 2013, defendants Han and Xu, along with X County resident Li, and residents Zhao and Zheng from a certain district, went for entertainment in a private room on the second floor of \"XXXX\" KTV in X County. At the same time, residents Li Jia, Zhang, and Zhang from a certain district were also at the KTV on the third floor in room \"888.\" Later, Zhang met Li in the hallway and invited Li, Han, Xu, Zhao, and others to join the entertainment in room \"888.\" During the entertainment, Li Jia and Zhao began to argue and subsequently fought physically. Xu, Han, and others assisted Zhao, while Zhang and others assisted Li Jia, resulting in mutual physical assault. After the KTV lobby manager Sun persuaded them, Xu called Han, Zhao, and others out of the room to go downstairs, with Li Jia, Zhang, Li, Shi, and others following behind. Upon seeing Zheng resting on the stairs, Li Jia and others initiated an assault on Zheng using bottles or physically attacking him. Xu witnessed this and ran into the BBQ restaurant \"XX\" in a trade city, grabbed a kitchen knife from the back preparation area, and returned to chase and slash Li Jia in front of the KTV. Li Jia fell while escaping, turned around to hold Xu and attempted to seize the knife. During this process, Zhang and Han arrived. Zhang kicked Xu, and Xu handed the knife to Han, who then slashed Zhang on the back with it. Sun intervened and seized the knife from Han. Han and Xu fled the scene. Zhang subsequ", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is located in the Mayu Development Zone of a certain city, and the defendant Li is responsible for the company's environmental protection work. Around May 2015, the company's production capacity increased, resulting in a larger volume of wastewater. The company's sewage treatment facilities could not handle the daily production of wastewater. The defendant Li contacted Liu (handled in a separate case) to remove wastewater from the company. Liu, through Jin (subject to a separate criminal detention and on the run), found a dumping site at Xinkang Chemical Equipment Co., Ltd. on Industrial Road in the same city. Subsequently, Liu hired Huang (handled in a separate case) to drive a tanker truck to the company to collect wastewater and dump it at Xinkang Chemical Equipment Co., Ltd. on Industrial Road. Defendant Jia twice opened the company gate to allow the tanker truck to enter the west-side workshop and dump the wastewater. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Li had repeatedly instructed Liu and others to remove and dump the wastewater from Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., amounting to more than ten truckloads. According to the appraisal, the wastewater produced in workshop three of Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is classified as hazardous waste, with a hazardous characteristic of T (toxicity). Defendant Li received 40,000 yuan in illicit gains from Hebei Guanrun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. On December 27, 2012, defendant Li was sentenced to one year and nine months in prison by the Intermediate People's Court of Shijiazhuang City for the crime of intentional injury and was released after serving his sentence on January 24, 2013, thus being a repeat offender. The above facts were not contested by the defendants during the trial and are confirmed by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, the filing decision letter; the list of seized items and documents; notebook copies; investigation reports and photos; test reports; case handling notes; testimonies from witnesses Zhou, Gu, Jia Jia, Yang, etc.; statements and defenses by co-defendants Liu and Huang; statements and defenses by defendants Li and Jia; interrogation recordings; call records from defendant Jia to co-defendant Huang; the case arrival report; prior conviction evidence; criminal judgment; and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: From April 2018 to October 2018, Zhang A (to be handled in another case) used the defendant Tao to forge four fake motor vehicle registration certificates and four fake motor vehicle driving certificates for the purpose of fraud. In March 2019, Han purchased four fake railway motor vehicle driving licenses and one ID card from Tao through Zhou. These documents were produced by Tao through the defendant Shen at the \"Daqi Advertisement\" shop operated by the defendant Zhang. The public prosecution authority, based on the criminal facts stated above, presented evidence to this court showing the confessions of defendants Tao, Zhang, and Shen, testimonies from witnesses such as Shen and Song, results from motor vehicle information inquiries, seized copies of motor vehicle registration certificates and driving licenses, WeChat personal information and bill screenshots, explanatory notes and WeChat chat screenshots, identification records, inquiry and arrest processes, and household registration proof. Accordingly", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution's allegations, at around midnight on April 23, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Chen, along with He (handled in a separate case), after conspiring together, drove to the \"XX Cattle Breeding Cooperative\" operated by Cui in a certain village, town, district, city. Taking advantage of Cui and others being asleep, defendant Chen drove the car to keep watch near the breeding farm, while defendant Zhang and He (handled in a separate case) used their tools to pry open the breeding farm's wall and stole five yellow cattle (valued at 46,000 RMB) from the farm. After succeeding, defendants Chen and Zhang drove the stolen five yellow cattle to another place to sell them for a total of 40,500 RMB, which they split evenly. On June 8, 2013, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Criminal Investigation Brigade of Port North Division, Public Security Bureau of a certain city, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, Zhang's family compensated the victim, Cui, for his economic losses amounting to 46,000 RMB. The victim, Cui, expressed understanding towards the actions of defendants Zhang and Chen. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Cui's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Qiu, Li, and Liu, the record of on-site inspection, site diagram, on-site photos, identification photos, identification record and photos, evidence retrieval notice, Chen's Agricultural Bank account statements, the price assessment conclusion report, appraisal opinions notice, receipt of criminal case registration form, case filing decision, arrest process, materials of Chen's voluntary surrender, household registration certificate, and the confessions of defendants Zhang and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at approximately 4:00 a.m. on August 2, 2014, the defendant Lei, in order to collect a debt, gathered defendants Wang and Nie, and armed with baseball bats, they cornered the victim Sun in a residential area of this city. They dragged him into a car and took him to the woods near the entrance of Binjiang Garden Community on Binhe East Road, where they beat him and used violent threats to demand repayment of 20,000 yuan. The victim Sun then borrowed 4,500 yuan from his friend Liu and withdrew 15,000 yuan from his bank card, handing over the total amount to defendant Lei. At around 8:00 a.m., the three defendants allowed Sun to leave. The 19,500 yuan involved in the case has been returned to the victim. Additionally, it was found that on August 22, 2014, the public security agency, led by defendant Lei, apprehended defendant Nie. After the incident, the victim Sun expressed forgiveness towards the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were accepted by defendants Lei, Wang, and Nie during the trial without objection and are corroborated by the victim's report and statement transcripts, the arrest process, witness testimonies, identification records, a list of seized items, photos of tools used in the crime, video screenshots of the incident, bank withdrawal records, payroll statements, a letter of forgiveness, the confessions of the three defendants, and household registration information, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Nie": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around midnight on August 8, 2014, the defendants Rao and Wu, along with Wu B, Wu A (both handled separately), and others, had a dispute with the victim Guo (handled in a separate case) at the Sanya Beer City in Chenyong Village, Qiaonan Street in the district, over an issue with a microphone. A fight then broke out between the parties. During the altercation, defendants Rao, Wu, and others used fists and glass cups to injure the victim Guo (resulting in minor injury level 2). The victim Guo, wielding a fruit knife, injured defendants Rao, Wu, Wu B, and Wu A (Rao, Wu, and Wu C sustained minor injuries, and Wu D's injuries are tentatively classified as minor injury level 2).", "label": {"Rao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that in the early morning of August 2, 2012, defendants Zhong and Ma, after prior discussion, went to the vicinity of the \"Hongwei\" ginning factory at the \"Shashili\" Hotel in Hongqi Village, Kuaijie Street, Shaoxing County, and stole a Benniu brand electric tricycle parked there by Yun by prying the lock and connecting wires. According to the appraisal, the vehicle was valued at 4,500 yuan. After the incident, the vehicle was recovered and returned to Yun. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhong and Ma during the court trial, and are corroborated by the evidence, including the involved vehicle and photos, the list of items seized and returned by the Shaoxing County Public Security Bureau, receipts, the criminal judgment, the certificate of apprehension and explanation issued by the police of the Shaoxing County Public Security Bureau, Yun's statement, and the price appraisal conclusion, which are sufficient to establish their validity.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that on September 1, 2016, the defendant Hou, due to his girlfriend Feng breaking up with him, posted nude photos of Feng at stations and markets. Feng reported this to the police. Around 3:00 a.m. on September 3 of the same year, Hou, along with Xiong, went to the entrance of Feng's home at Tung Lu Shan Five Village, Jinhu Street Office, Daye City. Hou kicked open the wooden door of Feng's house. Xiong entered and restrained Feng's father, Feng Sr., to prevent him from stopping Hou. Hou entered Feng's room, and using methods such as electric shocks and pulling her hair, forcibly dragged Feng from the bed to the doorway of her home. The two defendants then lifted Feng into the back seat of Hou's car, with Xiong holding down Feng's hands and feet to prevent her from resisting. Hou drove the car, taking Feng to locations such as Junshan Cemetery in Daye City and a certain village in a certain town, using threats until around 7:00 a.m. when Feng was released. Upon examination, Feng's bodily injuries were categorized as minor. After the incident, Xiong voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiong": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 4:00 PM on September 5, 2015, defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang, and Zou (criminally detained and at large) drove a vehicle with the license plate number of a certain place F××××× to the vicinity of the Hongyu Badminton Hall in Bingxi Town, Yushan County. After discussing, defendants Xu, Zou stayed in the car to keep watch and facilitate the getaway, while defendants Xu, Zhang got out of the car to commit theft. After getting out of the car, defendant Xu was responsible for keeping watch for Zhang, while defendant Zhang used a tool resembling a screwdriver to successively break the right rear window glass of the black car with license plate number of a certain place E××××× owned by victim Shu A and the passenger side window glass of the blue car with the license plate number of a certain place E××××× owned by victim Shu B, and stole cash in the amount of 2,800 yuan. Defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang, Zou used the stolen cash for fuel expenses and other expenditures, with the remainder divided equally among the four. Further investigation revealed that the stolen money had been recovered and fully returned to the victims. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Xu, Xu, Zhang during the court trial, and were supported by the statements of victims Shu B, Shu A, identification records, scene diagrams and photos, copies of criminal judgments of the three defendants' previous convictions, and the household registration information of the three, serving as sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On September 1, 2013, at approximately 17:00, Liu, after drinking, drove a vehicle with a certain license plate to the intersection of a village on a certain road in a certain district, resulting in a traffic accident that caused one death. After the accident, in order to help Liu evade legal responsibility, defendant Sun, defendant Wang, and Liu conspired together, deciding that defendant Wang would impersonate Liu to take responsibility. Subsequently, defendants Wang and Sun provided false testimony to the traffic police department to shield Liu, thereby preventing the timely legal pursuit of Liu's responsibility. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city are true. It was also found that this case was uncovered during the investigation process by the public security organs. Defendants Wang and Sun were both summoned to the case. During the court hearing, defendants Wang and Sun raised no objections to the above facts, which were substantiated by documentary evidence such as case-breaking explanations, witness testimonies, expert opinions, and the confessions of the defendants, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial verification, it was found that from 2008 to 2013, the defendants Hou and Zhu, during Hou's term as the Party branch secretary and director of the village committee in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city, conspired with Zhu, the accountant of the village committee. They leveraged their official positions to assist the government in declaring the compensation for land requisition for a certain section of Wangyan Road in the village. Under the guise of others, they falsely reported 4690.4 square meters of requisitioned land, thereby fraudulently obtaining a total of 147,758.80 yuan in national land compensation funds. Subsequently, each defendant received more than 70,000 yuan of the illicit money. After the incident was exposed, defendants Hou and Zhu returned all the funds. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Hou and Zhu during the trial process, and were supported by testimonies from witnesses Jin, Hou1, Zhu1, and Yu; written evidence including four detailed diagrams of land requisition for certain sections of a highway, one expense statement; documentation of the land compensation details and related vouchers and distribution records from 2008 in a certain village; compensation details for land requisition and the village land compensation distribution table from 2013 in a certain area; records and vouchers of deposits and withdrawals from a rural commercial bank; proof documents from the People's Government of a certain town in a certain city; property inventory list and account transfer list from a certain Municipal People's Procuratorate, cash payment slips from the Bank of China; confessions of defendants Hou and Zhu and their household registration proofs and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at approximately 11 PM on July 23, 2014, defendants Shan and Peng engaged in a physical altercation due to previous disputes at the entrance of gate No. 3 of \"Anta Company\" located in a village in a town of a certain city. Defendant Shan injured defendant Peng's head, shoulder, and other areas with a fruit knife during the fight. After the police arrived at the scene, defendant Peng punched victim Ye, who was not involved in the fight, in the nose. According to forensic identification, the injuries to defendant Peng's left occipital region and left lower rib area were both classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while those to his left eyelid and left shoulder were classified as slight injuries. The injury to victim Ye's left nasal orbital region was classified as a minor injury of the second degree. On July 24, 2014, defendants Shan and Peng voluntarily went to the Chidian Police Station of a city police bureau to undergo an investigation following notification by phone from the public security organ. After the incident, defendant Shan compensated defendant Peng 43,700 yuan and obtained reconciliation; defendant Peng compensated victim Ye 43,700 yuan and obtained reconciliation. Additionally, after examination, it was found by this court that, according to forensic identification, the injuries to defendant Shan's left forehead, neck, and left hand were classified as slight injuries. Defendant Shan and Peng had no objections to the aforementioned facts, which were substantiated by the statement of victim Ye, the testimonies of witnesses Zhao and Zheng, medical reports, medical record materials, forensic identification provided by the forensic laboratory of the city police bureau, the recognition record, photographs, and explanations by victim Ye and witness Zhao of defendants Shan and Peng, the recognition records, photographs, and explanations by defendants Shan and Peng of the crime scene and the corresponding victims and defendants, the criminal judgment, information on previous convictions, household registration information, reeducation through labor decision, mediation agreement, reconciliation letter and receipt, as well as evidence provided by the city police bureau regarding the account of the arrest and case resolution, work explanations, and voluntary surrender report, all of which were sufficient to support the conviction.", "label": {"Shan": ["Imprisonment"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jinwan District in a certain city charged that on July 27, 2014, the defendants He and Liu, after conspiring, went to a certain garden in Stone Mountain, Nanshui Town, ×××× District of a certain city. Defendant Liu was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant He used a pre-prepared iron rod to pry open the garden's main gate and the lock of the columbarium, stealing four urns belonging to the garden administrator Zhong and his relatives. Subsequently, the two concealed the stolen urns separately on the roof of the garden's restroom and in the woods beside the garden's perimeter wall, among other places. On July 29, defendants He and Liu used a phone with the number 138×××××××8 to contact the victim Zhong and extorted 20,000 RMB by threatening to destroy the urns. In desperation, victim Zhong transferred 5,000 RMB to the account provided by defendants He and Liu via bank transfer and, following instructions received via text messages from the two, found two of the urns. Later, victim Zhong also found the other two urns near the garden.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On July 7, 2016, at around 16:00, the defendants Chen and Xu went to the entrance of the \"Thirsty\" beverage shop in a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. When they discovered a plastic bag hanging on the handle of a stroller beside Liang, Chen acted as a cover, while Xu stole the wallet. Subsequently, the two defendants were caught on the spot. The charges assert that defendants Chen and Xu, with the intent of illegal possession, jointly pickpocketed others' property. Their actions have violated Article X, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of X. Defendants Chen and Xu had previously been sentenced to imprisonment for intentional crimes and committed another crime punishable by imprisonment within five years after completing their sentence, thus they are considered recidivists and should be given a heavier punishment. The defendants Chen and Xu raised no objection to the facts and charges brought by the public prosecution. Upon investigation, it was found that on July 7, 2016, at around 16:00, the defendants Chen and Xu went to the entrance of the \"Thirsty\" beverage shop at the south square of Tianfa Plaza in a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. When they discovered a plastic bag hanging on the handle of a stroller beside Liang, Chen approached and, while Liang was unguarded, opened the plastic bag and found a wallet inside, then acted as a cover while Xu stole the wallet. Subsequently, the two defendants were caught on the spot. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Xu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the statements of the victim Liang, the testimonies of witnesses Lü, Weng, Chen, Dai, You, and Cheng, household registration records, on-site investigation records and photos, audiovisual materials production instructions, audiovisual materials, photo identifications by the defendants, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, explanations of how defendants Chen and Xu were brought to justice, case registration forms, case filing decisions, previous criminal records of defendants Chen and Xu, and the confessions of defendants Chen and Xu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 3 a.m. on May 14, 2014, defendants Gong, Ma, and Wang sneaked into the Daming Palace Steel Trading Center in a certain district of this city to steal. The three of them climbed through a window into the \"Leisen Market\" on the second floor. Wang kept watch in the corridor while Gong and Ma entered room B2001, stealing 900 yuan in cash, a Dell laptop, an HP printer, a Canon multifunction machine, a Shenguang laminator, and a woman's handbag. The three then fled the scene together. The stolen 900 yuan in cash was divided with Gong receiving 200 yuan and Ma receiving 700 yuan. On May 14, 2014, Wang was apprehended by the police; Gong and Ma were later apprehended on May 18, 2014. An appraisal determined that the stolen HP printer was valued at 880 yuan, the Canon multifunction machine at 370 yuan, the Shenguang laminator at 50 yuan, and the woman's handbag at 50 yuan. After the incident, Wang's family compensated the victim, Li, with 10,000 yuan for economic losses. Li expressed forgiveness for Wang's actions. The stolen HP printer, Canon printer, laminator, and woman's handbag were also recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong, Ma, and Wang during the trial, and they are corroborated by evidence provided by the police, including the case registration form, report materials, arrest records, price appraisal conclusions, victim statements, extraction records, lists of seized and returned items, on-site identification records and photos, recognition records and photos, site diagrams, site investigation records, confessions from the three defendants, and household registration certificates, sufficient to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kecheng District, a certain city, charged: On March 16, 2014, the victim Tang went to a certain city to visit her boyfriend Su, and was later taken to a pyramid scheme den on the third floor of No. 22, Daijia Village, Xinxin Street, Kecheng District, a certain city. Subsequently, as arranged by someone, the defendants Zhao, Ma, Li, and others used methods such as confiscating her mobile phone and accompanying her while she slept to monitor Tang closely around the clock. On the afternoon of March 26 of the same year, after receiving a report from Su, the Chengdong Police Station of the Economic Development Zone Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city rushed to the den and captured defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li on the spot. By this time, the victim Tang had been illegally deprived of her personal liberty for more than 10 days. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li during the court trial, and are substantiated by evidence including household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, the arrest record, location maps and photos, inspection transcripts, lists and photos of seized items, the victim Tang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Su and Dai, and the confessions of defendants Zhao, Ma, and Li, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that, after premeditation, on July 19, 2013, at around 1 p.m., defendants Xiao and Zhao were involved in an incident at the eighth floor of Building No. 5 of the City Central Hospital, located on Jiangbin West Road, in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Xiao acted as a lookout at the stairwell while defendant Zhao entered the ward on the eighth floor. Taking advantage of the owner Ni's sleep on bed No. 23, Zhao stole a shoulder bag from the bedside containing 2,000 yuan in cash and a Samsung N7000 mobile phone (valued at 1,361 yuan). Following the incident, defendant Xiao returned 3,000 yuan, and defendant Zhao returned 1,000 yuan, both of which were given back to the owner, Ni. On July 31, 2013, defendant Xiao led the police to arrest defendant Zhao at the Yin Du Garden Chess and Card Room on Jinxiu Road in this district. Additionally, on August 12, 2013, Xiao reported Sher's theft crime and led the police to arrest Sher at the \"Jiangxi Restaurant\" on Longqiao Front Road, Zhanqian East Community in this district. The aforesaid facts were undisputed by defendants Xiao and Zhao during the court trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by the confessions of defendants Xiao and Zhao, the statement of victim Ni, the testimony of witness Zhang, recognition records, photos related to the case, certain call logs, a list of collected evidence, receipts, a price appraisal conclusion, explanatory documents, meritorious service materials, descriptions of the surrender process, a criminal judgment, a release certificate, and basic information from the permanent population, among other evidence.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on April 24, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, defendants Zou, Hu, and Lv operated a motorized vessel equipped with electric fishing tools in the Chenluo waters of Shuangliu, Xinzhou, in the Yangtze River area of this city. The method involved defendant Lv piloting the boat while defendant Zou connected a battery and inverter to an electrified fishing net, which was then lowered into the water. Defendant Hu collected the caught fish from the water and placed them in the boat's cabin. The three defendants engaged in electric fishing for approximately one hour, illegally capturing 7 kilograms of fish. They were apprehended on the spot by fisheries enforcement officers from the Hubei Provincial Fisheries Bureau and handed over to public security authorities. The police confiscated the battery, inverter, electric net, and other tools used in the offense, and the caught fish were released back into the water. Additionally, the leadership team for the fishing ban on the Yangtze and Han Rivers in a certain locality issued a \"Notice on Implementing the 2014 Fishing Ban Period in the Yangtze River,\" stipulating that the fishing ban period for a certain section of the Yangtze River would be from April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2014. The facts of this case were not disputed by the defendants during the court proceedings and were supported by physical evidence photos and on-site photos, accompanying case transfer lists, and lists for registering and preserving evidence, as well as written evidence such as the \"Proof of the Harm of Electric Fishing to Fishery Resources in the Yangtze River\" by a certain local Fisheries Administration and Port Supervision Management Office, the \"Notice on Implementing the 2014 Fishing Ban Period in the Yangtze River,\" records of arrests and case resolution by public security authorities, household registration certificates, and certifications from the Chenluo Village Committee of Shuangliu Town, Xinzhou District, and the Water Transport Community Residents' Committee of Shuangliu Street, among other documentary evidence, on-site inspection (survey) records, audio-visual materials, and other evidence that sufficiently establishes the case.", "label": {"Zou": ["Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention"], "Lv": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 1 a.m. on October 14, 2013, the defendants Wang and Xiao, along with Shen A, Lin A, Yang A, Wang B, and Wang A (all handled in a separate case), drove to the intersection of Jiefang Street and Chenghuang Road in a certain town of a certain county, intending to retaliate against Zhuang, with whom they had previous conflicts. Later, when they noticed a group of Zhuang's people driving a Jaguar with the license plate a××××× passing by, Wang, Xiao, and others armed themselves with machetes and attacked the car, causing multiple windows to break and significant damage to the body of the vehicle. Appraisal determined that the damaged parts of the vehicle were valued at 45,209 RMB. It was also found that on October 14, 2013, Wang persuaded defendant Xiao and the accomplices Lin A, Wang A, Yang A, Wang B, and Shen A to voluntarily surrender to the public security organ and truthfully confess their crimes. After Wang was brought to justice, he reported two criminal suspects to the public security organ, which was verified as true. During the trial in this court, the relatives of defendant Wang and accomplice Shen voluntarily paid compensation in the amount of 45,209 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xiao during the trial, and were further supported by their previous confessions, the confessions of accomplices Yang A, Lin A, Wang A, Shen A, Wang B, testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhuang, Cai, Chen, Yang, identification records, vehicle repair bills, receipts, price appraisal conclusion, household registration information, arrest records, material on meritorious service, criminal judgment, criminal archives, and payment receipts, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at around 8:00 a.m. on April 13, 2016, the defendants Wu and Zhang, after drinking, attempted to take a taxi in the bus lane by the big pagoda tree on Xiguan Main Street, Lianhu District of the city. Due to their intoxication, no taxi agreed to take them. The two defendants then stood in the bus lane and stopped bus number 202. The driver, Dong, requested them to clear the way, but Wu and Zhang ignored him and insulted Dong, causing the bus to be unable to proceed and the passengers to be stranded. Coincidentally, police officers Lü and Wang were on their way to carry out an anti-terrorism mission and passed by. Observing the situation, they attempted to persuade the two to leave. However, Wu and Zhang refused; Wu insulted the police and grabbed the collar of one of the officers. Meanwhile, Zhang took photos, sided with Wu, and continued to block the bus. They were later forcibly controlled and removed by additional police officers who arrived. By this time, the bus had been stopped for about 30 minutes. Evidence supporting these facts includes: 1. Case registration form and report materials; 2. Documentation of the capture by the public security authorities; 3. Testimonies from witnesses Dong, Wang, Lü, Wang Yi, and Zhou Wu; 4. Identification of witnesses Wang and Lü; 5. A surveillance video tape; 6. Confessions from defendants Wu and Zhang and their household registration certificates. All the evidence was presented and cross-examined in court, and it is confirmed and sufficient to make a conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Ouhai District in a certain city charges that, at around 9:00 a.m. on June 5, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhao, together with Zhao A (handled in a separate case) and others, went to the intersection of Nanxian Avenue and Xianyang Road in Sanyang Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city. Using a bundle wrapped in ghost money, with genuine one hundred yuan bills on the outside as bait, they employed methods such as \"dropping money,\" \"picking up money,\" and \"splitting money\" to set up a scheme, gaining the trust of victim He and subsequently enticing victim He to withdraw 27,000 yuan from the bank and hand it over to defendants Zhang, Zhao, and Zhao A, among others. After succeeding, they fled the scene with the money. The defendants Zhang and Zhao raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings. Additionally, the statements of victim He, the confession of Zhao A from the same case, identification records and photographs, deposit certificates, bank transaction inquiry records, surveillance footage, explanation notes, arrest details, personal information, and information on unlawful and criminal personnel, as well as the criminal judgment and the certificate of release after serving the sentence, all serve as evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wujiang District in a certain city charges: In the early morning of April 2, 2015, defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan, after premeditation, went near a barbecue stall at the entrance of Sanliqiao in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of Wujiang, and, using means such as beating with wooden sticks, wantonly and without reason assaulted victims Wang and Wang under the influence of alcohol, causing them injuries. According to forensic identification, the injuries to the left upper and lower limbs of victim Wang constituted minor injuries of the first degree, while the injuries to the face and right eye of victim Wang constituted slight injuries. Defendants Wu, Dong, and Duan voluntarily surrendered to the Wujiang Economic and Technological Development Zone Police Station of the Wujiang District Public Security Bureau on April 16, May 4, and May 6, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. After being brought to justice, defendant Ma truthfully confessed his criminal conduct. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution provides corresponding evidence and thus holds that defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan together wantonly assaulted others and the circumstances were egregious, their actions all constituting the crime of x. In the joint crime, defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, and Duan all played a major role and are all principal offenders. Defendants Wu, Dong, and Duan voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their crimes, thus constituting voluntary surrender. Defendant Ma truthfully confessed his crime. Please sentence them according to the law. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ma, Wu, Dong, or Duan during the court hearing. They are confirmed by the statement records of victims Wang and Wang, the testimony records of witnesses Ning and Cheng, identification records, the case development report, the forensic medical assessment of bodily injuries, the forensic medical documentation review opinion, hospital admission records, administrative penalty decisions, photographs, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment"], "Duan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution's allegations, at around 12:30 am on July 31, 2013, the defendants He and Luo, along with Wang (handled in a separate case), sold a packet of white crystals (net weight 1.77 grams) for RMB 600 to Zhou at the intersection of North Fourth Section of First Ring Road and Hengde Road, under the Seven Days Inn in a district of Chengdu City. They were subsequently apprehended at the scene by police officers. An analysis confirmed that the white crystals contained methamphetamine.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Sujiatun District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 8:00 p.m. on April 29, 2016, defendants Chang and Liu, after drinking, went to the front of the residential area of the electric industry in Sujiatun District and, without reason, blocked the Mazda sedan driven by Suo with the license plate number Liao AG3K63, vandalized the vehicle, and chased Suo. They then vandalized vehicles parked in the courtyard parking lot of the residential area with license plate numbers Liao A9B241, Liao ABJ777, Liao AF665V, Liao AF8J26, and Liao AC80N6, and chased Wang and Wang who came downstairs to check their vehicles. According to an appraisal, Wang (referred to as Wang in the document) suffered minor injuries which included contusions (with abrasions) on the right zygomatic area, bite marks on the left forearm and left calf resulting in skin damage. Wang (referred to as Wang in the document) suffered minor injuries which included damage to the oral mucosa, scalp bite marks resulting in skin damage, and bite marks on the right forearm resulting in skin damage. According to a price appraisal, the damaged vehicles were valued at RMB 3,411. After the incident, the two defendants reached a reconciliation agreement with all the victims and received the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial process, and were corroborated by outpatient medical records, witness testimony from Liu and Zhu, statements from victims Suo, Wang A, Wang, letters of understanding, identification transcripts, appraisal opinions, and basic population information, among other evidence, sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Chang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that around 8 a.m. on November 23, 2015, the defendants Huang, Li, and Zhao rode an electric scooter to a certain village on a particular street in the new district of a certain city, waiting for an opportunity to steal. After observing, Huang selected Room 102 of Building 86 in the village as the target for the theft. Zhao used pliers prepared in advance to cut the door lock. Huang served as a lookout, while Li and Zhao entered the room to commit the theft. Li and Zhao stole a blue Dell laptop and a black leather backpack belonging to the victim, Wang, and then escaped the scene with Huang. At around 9 a.m. on November 23, 2015, the police arrested Huang, Li, and Zhao at the intersection of Meilong Road in the new district of a certain city, and recovered the stolen laptop, backpack, and tools used in the crime: two electric scooters and a pair of pliers. According to the appraisal, the stolen Dell laptop was valued at 430 RMB, and the backpack was valued at 70 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang, Li, and Zhao during the trial, and were corroborated by relevant evidence presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to confirm their validity.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: Between May 2011 and May 31, 2012, defendants Chen and Wang, a married couple, operated an unlicensed internet cafe out of their temporary residence at No. 20 Henghecheng Road, Bazhiqiao Village, Baisha Road Street, in a certain city, without obtaining a business license, internet culture business permit, or other relevant licenses. The total revenue amounted to over 60,000 RMB, with illegal profits of 18,000 RMB. After being apprehended, defendant Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. On May 31, 2011, defendant Wang turned herself in at the Baisha Road Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Chen and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Zheng 1, Zheng 2, Liu, Zhang, and others, as well as the search record, telecommunication broadband situation report, customer registration forms, rental agreement, list of confiscated items, apprehension details, case entry statements, and identity proofs of defendants Chen and Wang, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that defendant Zhang and Li were friends. On the evening of May 6, 2014, around 11 PM, defendant Zhang, due to certain reasons, drove a white Honda CRV SUV to chase a white Hyundai sedan driven by Li. When they reached about 200 meters west of the north gate of a residential area on Huixin Road in a certain county, Zhang's car forced Li's car to stop on the north side of the road. Due to a verbal disagreement, Zhang started to fight with Hou, who was sitting in the front passenger seat of Li's car. Taking advantage of the situation, Li fled the scene. Defendant Zhang then called defendant Dong and another individual, Li Yi (handled in a separate case), claiming that he was beaten near the aforementioned residential area and asked them to come quickly to assist. Defendants Dong and Li Yi rushed to the scene, and the three of them used fists, kicks, and sticks to beat Hou, injuring him. According to a forensic assessment, Hou's injuries constituted minor injuries of the second degree. It was also found that after the incident, defendants Zhang and Dong reached a civil mediation agreement with the victim Hou, whereby Zhang and Dong compensated Hou a total of RMB 35,000 for medical expenses, lost wages, inpatient meal allowances, and other economic losses. The victim Hou expressed understanding of Zhang and Dong's illegal actions. These facts were not disputed by defendants Dong and Zhang during the court hearing and are supported by evidence such as the household registration certificates of the two defendants, the civil mediation agreement, the letter of understanding, testimonies from witnesses including Li, the statement from the victim Hou, the injury assessment report by the criminal technical department of a certain county's public security bureau confirming Hou's injuries as second-degree minor injuries, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Dong and Zhang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, the court found that the defendant Zhang, in order to demand gambling debts and interest from the victim Tao Yi, forcibly took victim Tao Yi into a van at around 18:00 on October 15, 2014, at Nan Street, Xueyan Town, Wujin District, Changzhou City. Zhang then contacted defendant Li by phone to jointly demand money. Subsequently, the two defendants brought Tao Yi to the Caotiao Maixiangyuan Teahouse, forced him to write an IOU for 30,000 RMB, and made him contact his family to repay the debts. Later, defendant Li contacted \"Hei\" (handled in a separate case) to come over. At around 20:00 that evening, the three took Tao Yi to a fish pond in a village, where they assaulted Tao Yi and forced him to repay the money. By 22:00 that night, they took Tao Yi to a hotel in a certain town of a certain city, where they again assaulted him to force him to repay the money. The next morning at around 8:00, defendants Zhang and Li released Tao Yi after his parents repaid 30,000 RMB on his behalf.\n\nIt was also found that defendant Li turned himself in to the Panjia Police Station at around 15:00 on October 30, 2014, and truthfully confessed the facts of this case. Defendants Zhang and Li respectively returned 10,000 RMB and 20,000 RMB to victim Tao Yi and obtained his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the trial, and were sufficiently substantiated by the statement record of victim Tao Yi, the testimony records of witnesses Wang and Tao Jia, as well as the case occurrence and arrest process, identification records, and photos provided and produced by the Wujin District Public Security Bureau of Changzhou City.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On January 9, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, the defendant Hu was dissuaded and verbally summoned by police officers present due to disrupting the election procedures of the Village Committee of Shang'ao Village in Cicheng Town, this district. However, Hu did not cooperate and, during his resistance, punched officer Mao in the head and face, resulting in swelling and scratches on Mao's face and behind his left ear. On January 28, 2014, at about 2:00 PM, officers Yao, Wang, and Zhang from the Jiangbei Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau went to the restaurant operated by the defendants Hu and Wang, located at No. 12 Miaoshan Village, Cicheng Town, this district, to summon Hu regarding obstructing official duties at the election site. During this period, defendant Hu punched and kicked the police officers and instructed defendant Wang to brandish a kitchen knife at them, obstructing the officers from performing their duties according to the law. The aforementioned facts have been confessed to by defendants Hu and Wang in court and are substantiated by evidence provided by the public prosecution and verified in court, including the physical evidence of the kitchen knife, documentary evidence such as police officer credentials, identity documents, the accounts of the incident, the case-breaking narrative, seizure orders, medical records, photographs, CD production explanations, testimonies from witnesses Chen Jia, Xu, Chen Yi, Xie, and Lu, statements from the victims Mao, Wang, Yao, and Zhang, the confessions of defendants Hu and Wang, identification records, and surveillance videos. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial and investigation, it was found that on September 24, 2015, at around 7 PM, the defendants Sheng and Wang, while dining at the Kelai Xiang Restaurant near Fumin Street in a certain district of a certain city, inexplicably threw stools, bricks, and other objects under the influence of alcohol at another diner, Mr. Yu, causing a fracture to the inner wall of Mr. Yu’s left eye socket and a fracture to the left nasal bone. Additionally, they caused soft tissue contusions around the left eye and left forehead of Mr. Yang, the restaurant owner who came to intervene. According to a forensic assessment, the injuries to the head and face of Mr. Yu and the facial injuries of Mr. Yang are classified as minor injuries. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sheng and Wang during the court hearing. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Mr. Yu and Mr. Yang, the testimony of witnesses Wei, Liu, and You, the confessions of the defendants Sheng and Wang, the forensic human injury degree assessment reports numbered (Zhi) Public (Criminal) Identification Injury Zi No. 2015-322 and 359, as well as the work situation and household registration information provided by the public security organs. During the trial, the relatives of the defendants Sheng and Wang reached a consensual settlement agreement with Mr. Yu and Mr. Yang regarding civil compensation, which was fully executed.", "label": {"Sheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on September 2, 2020, defendants Yao and Gong, after finishing their late-night meal at the \"Chuanyi Shizu\" BBQ restaurant at XXX Chengnan Road, Huinan Town, in this district, were preparing to leave when defendant Yao, intoxicated, unprovokedly questioned Wang and Ren, among others, who were having a late-night meal at the entrance of the restaurant, leading to a quarrel. Subsequently, defendants Yao and Gong physically assaulted victim Wang. During the altercation, Yao struck Wang on the head with a beer bottle, causing injury. According to forensic identification, Wang sustained a contusion on the left parietal scalp, assessed as minor injury. After the incident, defendants Yao and Gong remained at the scene for police to address the matter despite being aware that others had reported the incident. Upon detention, defendant Gong truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the court proceedings, the families of defendants Yao and Gong compensated victim Wang with RMB 10,000, and Wang expressed understanding of the defendants' actions. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yao and Gong during the trial and were corroborated by evidential materials such as: victim Wang’s statements and identification records verified in court, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Ren, Xia, He, and Li, the decision, list, and records of seized items, injury examination notification, and the forensic identification report by Shanghai Linji Health Management Consulting Co., Ltd., the letter of understanding, the incident and arrest process, confessions of defendants Yao and Gong, and household registration records. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Gong": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that around 3:30 PM on November 6, 2019, defendants Yu and Li, along with another person named Yu, got into an argument with the victim, Huang, over a parking dispute at the entrance of the Sanlin Police Station located at XXX Sanlin Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai. Subsequently, defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu assaulted victim Huang by pushing, punching, and kicking him. An assessment determined that the injuries sustained by victim Huang were minor. On November 6, 2019, defendants Yu and Li, as well as the other Yu, were apprehended by public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts after being brought to the station. After the incident, the three defendants compensated the victim Huang and received his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimony and identification records of victim Huang, verified during the trial, as well as the testimony of witness Han, the forensic appraisal report from Shanghai Yangxin Health Management Consulting Co., Ltd., relevant letters of forgiveness, a list of evidence received from public security authorities, injury examination notices, records of the incident and arrest, basic information on the residential population, and confessions of defendants Yu, Li, and the other Yu, among other pieces of evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on August 24, 2013, the defendants Sun and Liu went to the front of the underground supermarket at Grand World in a certain city. They used a window-breaking hammer to smash the glass of a black Bora sedan belonging to Wang (from a certain village in the city), which was parked there (compensation has been made). They stole 500 yuan in cash from the car, a white Apple A1332 mobile phone worth 2,396 yuan, and a black HTC 329 bar phone worth 850 yuan (all stolen goods have been returned to the owner). The total amount stolen by the two defendants amounted to 3,746 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Liu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by Wang's statement, testimony from the witness Zhao, lists of items seized and returned by the public security organs, records of capture, household registration certificates, the appraisal conclusion from the Price Certification Center of the Municipal Price Bureau, the criminal judgment No. 93 issued by the Shijiazhuang Qiaoxi District People's Court, the release certificate from Hebei Shijiazhuang Prison, reeducation through labor decision documents No. 069 (2011) and No. 27 (2012) issued by the Shijiazhuang City People's Government Labor Reeducation Management Committee, and letters of understanding, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City charged that on the morning of December 23, 2013, Tian (already sentenced), due to an economic dispute with the victim Yu, invited defendants Gong and He to drive to the victim Yu's residence in a certain community in the JinYinHu office of a certain district in the city to demand money. However, they found no success as victim Yu was out. Tian believed that victim Yu was deliberately avoiding them, which aroused his dissatisfaction. At 16:30 on the same day, together with defendants Gong and He, Tian drove into the underground garage of the community. They used steel pipes, bricks, and glass shards to smash, scrape, and damage the Audi car with license plate number E A××××× belonging to victim Yu, resulting in damage to the car body, window glass, rearview mirrors, and other parts. According to the appraisal by the pricing department, the total damage to the Audi car with license plate number E A××××× amounted to 92,158 yuan. After the incident, Tian's relatives compensated victim Yu for the economic loss with 100,000 yuan. Defendants Gong and He were apprehended and brought to justice by the sub-bureau of the Wuhan Public Security Bureau during their period of compulsory drug rehabilitation. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong and He during the court trial. The case is substantiated by evidence including photos of the damaged vehicle, documentary evidence like identity information, phone call logs, vehicle repair material application forms, vehicle information, compensation receipts, criminal judgment and release certificates, administrative penalty decision, compulsory drug rehabilitation decision, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Xu, and Bu, statements from victim Yu, confessions and identification records from defendants Gong, He, and their co-defendant Tian, price appraisal conclusion, on-site investigation records, surveillance video screenshots, and records of the process of bringing them to justice, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from November 2010 to May 2012, defendants Chen and Deng, without approval from the relevant national departments, unauthorizedly operated an internet cafe to provide internet surfing services in a house at 5-2 Shang'er Road, Shangtian Town, in the city, until they were apprehended by the police on May 16, 2012. The amount involved in the illegal operations had reached more than 66,000 RMB. On that day, defendant Deng was summoned, and defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the defendants were brought to the case, both truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Deng and Chen during the trial of this case, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Jiang, Long, and others, as well as inspection records and photos, income lists, statistical sheets, receipts, water and electricity payment slips, population information forms, and the arrest process provided by the police, which are sufficient to establish the case. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution recommends that both defendants Chen and Deng be sentenced to five to six months of detention, with a suspension of the sentence, and be fined.", "label": {"Deng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 12:20 PM on January 11, 2013, the defendants Liang and Wang sneaked into the Can’t Bite Restaurant on Starlight Avenue, Changhe Street, in this district. Taking advantage of a moment when the victim, Xu, was unprepared, the defendant Wang acted as a lookout while the defendant Liang pickpocketed an Apple iPhone 4S from the right pocket of the victim Xu's jacket, and later sold the stolen goods. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 2,700 RMB. After being brought to justice, the defendant Liang led the investigators to arrest the defendant Wang. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Liang and Wang during the trial. Additionally, the evidence is corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, an identification record, a price appraisal report, surveillance video discs, a decision on re-education through labor, previous criminal judgments, details of the arrest, an explanatory statement, household registration certificates of the defendants Liang and Wang, and their confessions to the police and in court. This evidence is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that at approximately 1:00 PM on November 27, 2014, the defendants Guan and Liu were apprehended by police officers near the Yellow River Bank on Qinghe North Street in a certain district of a certain city. They were caught selling a package of methamphetamine (known as \"ice\") to Suo for the price of 500 yuan. The methamphetamine sold by Guan and Liu was confiscated, with a net weight of 0.8 grams.", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On March 3, 2015, at around 16:00, after premeditation, defendants Long and Ou went to the entrance of the Guoda Pharmacy at No. 15-3 Gaoxinnan Road in Chengzhong District of this city. Defendant Ou acted as a lookout on the sidewalk in front of the Dongcheng Copy Shop, while defendant Long used a lock-picking tool to break the lock of a Dishu electric scooter parked there by the victim, Cai. Long then drove the electric scooter away from the scene. When they reached the entrance of Wenxin Home at No. 3 Customs Road in Chengzhong District, they were apprehended by the police. Defendant Ou was captured by the police at the lookout location. The stolen item was appraised by the Liuzhou City Price Certification Center and valued at 1,860 RMB. The Public Security Bureau lawfully seized the stolen electric scooter and has returned it to the victim.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at around 21:00 on February 19, 2014, the victim Wu Mouyi was deceived into a pyramid scheme hideout located at Room 602, No. 81, Zhongshan West Road, Shunchang County. Defendant Zhang locked the door, and defendants Zhang, Pan, Tu, and others attempted to recruit Wu Mouyi into the pyramid scheme. When Wu Mouyi expressed the desire to leave, defendants Zhang, Pan, Tu, and others prevented him from leaving by locking the door and taking turns to guard him, thereby illegally depriving Wu Mouyi of his personal freedom. At around 16:00 on February 26, 2014, Wu Mouyi attempted to escape by jumping from the stairs between the fifth and sixth floors at No. 81, Zhongshan West Road, Shunchang County to the first floor, where he was found by the public and rescued after they reported to the police. According to the forensic evidence assessment by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, Wu Mouyi's injuries were minor. Defendants Pan and Tu were apprehended by the public security authorities on February 26, 2014, and defendant Zhang was apprehended on April 10, 2014. After being brought to justice, the three defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. During the court trial, defendants Zhang, Pan, and Tu did not object to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the statement of the victim Wu Mouyi, the testimony of the witness Wu Moujia, documentary evidence such as the household registration certificate, a certificate of no criminal record, and a criminal record certificate issued by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, the record of events, identification transcripts, the criminal judgment (2008) Bo Xing Chu Zi No. 200 made by the People's Court of Boluo County, Guangdong Province, the forensic pathologic injury assessment certificate issued by the forensic science laboratory of the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, the on-site inspection record, site diagrams, and photos produced by the Shunchang County Public Security Bureau, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 10 p.m. on May 21, 2014, the defendant Han, due to an inability to properly handle personal romantic matters, got into a dispute with the victim Zan at the entrance of the construction site of the fifth section of Peacock City's University Town Phase II in the Langfang Development Zone Oriental University City. Subsequently, Han called the defendant Hu and Lin (who is at large). The three of them used fists and feet to strike Zan on the face and body, causing multiple fractures of Zan's nasal bones on both sides and a separation of the right nasomaxillary suture. After injuring Zan, the three fled the scene. According to a forensic injury assessment by the Langfang City Public Security Bureau, Zan's injuries were classified as second-degree minor injuries. On June 17, 2014, the defendant Han was arrested by the Zibo Railway Police Brigade of Qingdao Railway Public Security Office. On December 3, 2014, the defendant Hu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After arriving at the case, defendants Han and Hu both truthfully confessed their criminal behavior. Additionally, it was found that on September 6, 2014, the families of defendants Han and Hu compensated victim Zan for economic losses and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not contested by defendants Han and Hu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Han and Hu; the statement of the victim Zan; the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Niu; the forensic assessment report of human injury degree; identification records; household registration evidence, registration form of the person at large, case arrival process, administrative penalty decision, forgiveness agreement, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at around 14:00 on March 12, 2014, defendants Zhang and Li went to the Nanshan Base Yard of a construction company in Sunshine Lijing, in a certain city, and without cause, used shovels and iron pipes to assault Hu and Jiang. This resulted in Hu suffering a fracture to the lower wall of his left eye socket, which was assessed by a forensic doctor as a secondary minor injury. Jiang sustained injuries to his left upper limb and left lower limb, with bruises covering an area of more than 15 square centimeters, assessed as a minor injury by forensic examination. After the incident, defendant Li voluntarily reported to the public security authorities on July 18, 2014. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the court hearing. Furthermore, the accounts of the victims Hu and Jiang, the testimonies of witnesses Wang and Shi, identification records, forensic opinions, documentary evidence, and other evidence confirm these facts, maki", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was determined that from the end of 2012 to August 26, 2013, the defendant Chen hired the defendant Huang and Wang (handled in a separate case) to counterfeit vernier calipers produced by his own company, Dingfeng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd., into \"Shang Gong\" and \"Guang Lu\" brand calipers at Sunshine Community, Building 42, Unit 3, Room 205, in a certain town of a certain city. On August 26, 2013, law enforcement officers from the city's Administration for Industry and Commerce seized 1,687 counterfeit vernier calipers that had not yet been sold at this processing site. On the same day, police from a town police station in the city arrested the defendant Huang at Sunshine Community, Building 42, Unit 3, Room 205, and captured the defendant Chen at Dingfeng Measuring Tools Co., Ltd. located in the same town. According to the appraisal, the seized counterfeit vernier calipers were valued at RMB 132,040. During the trial, the defendants Chen and Huang raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Gu and Wei, the trademark registration certificates, product appraisal report, price appraisal report, identification records, search records, list of seized items, on-site records and photographs, as well as the defendants' household registration certificates and arrest reports, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiaojiang District in a certain city charges: From December 2015 to February 20, 2016, defendants Yao and Hong, a married couple, provided a gambling venue for individuals engaging in gambling in the form of \"Dian San Hu\" at the game room next door to No. 35 Jiangcheng Alley, Haimen Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city. They charged 20 RMB per person, or provided coins as gambling tools for those gambling in the open space at their door, charging 20 RMB each time, with total profits amounting to 8,000 RMB. On February 20, 2016, gamblers Zheng, Zhou, Ni, and others were caught gambling at the entrance of the game room by police, who confiscated over 30,000 RMB in gambling funds and seized 65 one-yuan coins used as gambling tools within the aforementioned game room. On February 20, 2016, defendants Yao and Hong were summoned according to the law to appear in the case. They returned the illegal gains of 8,000 RMB after appearing in the case. These facts were not contested by defendants Yao and Hong during the court proceedings. The testimonies of witnesses Zheng, Ni, Zhou, Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Wang Bing, Zhao, Zhang, and others, along with the search record, seizure decision, on-site photos, identification records, household registration proof, details of the capture, the criminal judgment on Yao for harboring and shielding crime, and the confiscation list and other evidence, are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Yao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and verification, it was found that at around 19:00 on October 24, 2011, because Wu had a dispute with Li Bing (handled in a separate case) and was injured by him at No. 16 Zhanjiali, Mahu Village, Xixing Subdistrict in this district, the defendants Nie and Zhang arrived at the scene and, holding air conditioner racks and other objects, chased and beat Li Bing, causing him injuries. According to an assessment, the victim Li Bing sustained a cumulative scalp scar length of over 6 cm, a fracture of the right temporal bone, an orbital wall fracture, and a zygomatic arch fracture, with his injuries classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Nie and Zhang each compensated the victim Li Bing for economic losses amounting to 4,000 RMB and received his understanding. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Nie and Zhang during the court hearing, and there are statements from the victim Li Bing; testimonies from witnesses Wu, Gao, Li Jia, Li Yi, Ding, Su, and Liu; the forensic medical assessment of the degree of bodily injury; photos of the crime tools; medical records; understanding statements and receipts; statements of circumstances; the process of the arrest; household registration certificates of the defendants Nie and Zhang; and their confessions at the public security organs and in court, all of which provide sufficient evidence to confirm the findings.", "label": {"Nie": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of August 11, 2012, after a verbal altercation and scuffle between the victim Chen Moujia, Yang Mou, Mo Mou, Huang Mou, and Chen Mouyi with Qian, they were led by Feng to the back entrance of the Guanhao City Club to be beaten by the defendant Jiang, along with suspects Ding and Jiang Mouyi, resulting in Chen Moujia being seriously injured and having level nine disability. Defendant Qian has no major objections to the facts of the accusation but claims that he was unarmed and did not physically assault the victim Chen Moujia. His defense counsel presented the following arguments: 1. Defendant Qian was unarmed and did not directly assault Chen Moujia, playing a minor role and thus should be considered an accessory; 2. Qian surrendered voluntarily and confessed truthfully after the incident, which constitutes voluntary surrender; 3. There were reasons for the incident, and victim Chen Moujia was partially at fault. Therefore, they request a mitigated and lenient punishment for Qian. Defendant Jiang has no major objections to the facts of the accusation, claiming that he was merely fulfilling his duties as a security guard and trying to stop the fight between Chen Moujia and the others, not beating anyone with weapons or directly assaulting victim Chen Moujia. The trial established that in the early morning of August 11, 2012, the five victims, Chen Moujia, Yang Mou, Mo Mou, Huang Mou, and Chen Mouyi, were drinking at the Guanhao City Club in Baocheng District 31, Bao’an District, when they acted inappropriately towards a female bar employee, leading to a verbal altercation with the employee’s boyfriend, defendant Qian, which escalated into a fight. Qian then instructed waiter Fan to inform the bar security. Upon receiving the message, bar manager Feng (handled in a separate case) brought defendant Jiang, suspects Ding and Jiang Mouyi, and several security guards (detail", "label": {"Qian": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 3:00 PM on April 28, 2014, the defendant Zhang sold a small bag of methamphetamine to drug user Ji for 130 yuan next to the wild goose sculpture in the square outside the train station in a district of Ziyang City, a province. Later, the police arrested Zhang next to the wild goose sculpture in the square outside the train station, and subsequently arrested Ji near the intersection at the train station, and found a package of suspected methamphetamine white crystal-like substance on Ji. The suspected methamphetamine weighed 0.15 grams. After Zhang was arrested, he assisted the police in contacting the defendant Huang to purchase drugs from him. Huang purchased a package of methamphetamine from the defendant Lan. Subsequently, under police surveillance, Zhang conducted a transaction with Huang inside the Ziyan Internet Cafe on Yancheng Road in a district, where Huang sold the methamphetamine he purchased from Lan to Zhang for 200 yuan and was arrested. The 200 yuan methamphetamine weighed 0.72 grams. The police found on Huang a package of suspected methamphetamine white crystal-like substance, a package of suspected heroin white powder-like substance, cash, and a mobile phone. The suspected methamphetamine weighed 0.57 grams, and the suspected heroin weighed 0.06 grams. Later, Huang assisted the police in arresting Lan inside the Ziyan Internet Cafe on Yancheng Road in a district. According to the identification by the evidence identification room of the Ziyang City Public Security Bureau, methamphetamine was detected in the above suspected methamphetamine substance, and heroin was detected in the suspected heroin white powder-like substance. The facts of the above charges were undisputed by the defendants Lan, Huang, and Zhang during the trial, and are confirmed by physical evidence, documentary evidence, weighing records, witness testimony, on-site inspection records, identification records, and expert opinions, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Lan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on the afternoon of March 19, 2015, the defendants Ren and Long, after prior discussion, entered the home of Yu at No. 87, New Li, Huatian Village, Economic Development Zone of a certain city by climbing over the wall. They stole two platinum diamond rings, one gold ring, two pieces of jade, as well as Zhonghua cigarettes, a watch, and other items, with a total value of 12,764.8 yuan. After the incident, one platinum diamond ring, two pieces of jade, and other items were recovered and returned to the victim. Defendants Ren and Long compensated the victim for a total amount of 7,500 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ren and Long during the court proceedings and were corroborated by the victim Yu's statement, testimony from the witness Ye, identification records, on-site inspection records, seizure list, return list, jewelry sales receipts, assistance project price appraisal report, the public security administrative punishment decision, the arrest process, and household registration certificates, etc., which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Ren": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 2:40 a.m. on October 22, 2014, defendants Ma and Qu, while under the influence of alcohol, caused a disturbance and unjustifiably obstructed police officers on duty at the intersection of Liuquan North Road and Central Street in Huantai County. Defendants Ma and Qu insulted, pulled, and kicked Police Officer Qu and Auxiliary Police Officer Wei, resulting in multiple injuries to Officer Qu's face, neck, and knees. According to an assessment, Officer Qu's injuries were classified as minor. During the court hearing, both defendants raised no objections to these facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Sun and Zhang, documentary evidence such as the criminal case registration form and household registration certificate, and the forensic medical assessment of the degree of human injury, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Qu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the evening of June 19, 2013, the defendants Liu and Wang went to \"Diamond World KTV\" in Zhongxing Town, Siyang County, to sing with friends. While taking the elevator upstairs, defendant Liu accidentally stepped on the foot of the victim Ni Yi, leading to a conflict and argument between the two parties, which was later broken up by others. At around 11 PM that night, defendant Liu saw victim Ni Yi coming out of \"Diamond World KTV\" and waved for him to come over, after which Liu assaulted him. Subsequently, defendants Hai, Wang, and Li also unjustifiably punched and kicked victim Ni Yi. As a result, victim Ni Yi suffered a nasal bone fracture, a fracture of the medial wall of the right orbital, and a fracture of the frontal process of the right maxilla. An assessment determined that victim Ni Yi's injuries constituted minor injuries. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Liu, Hai, and Wang compensated the victim for economic losses amounting to 30,000 yuan, and they received forgiveness from victim Ni Yi. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Li, Wang, and Hai during the court proceedings and were corroborated by victim Ni Yi's statement, testimonies of witnesses He, Tang, Han, Yin, Ni Jia, Xu, Shen, Jiang, and others, as well as by evidence such as the identification record, mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, forensic medical assessment of bodily injuries, administrative penalty decision, and household registratio", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: In the early hours of February 25, 2016, defendants Cheng and Zhang arrived at the bottom of Unit 3, Building 6, in a certain district of the city. Zhang acted as a lookout while Cheng used tools such as a file and a screwdriver to pick the lock and steal a Qingyi BMW model electric car belonging to the victim, Yang, which was parked there (valued at 16,405 yuan as appraised). On March 3, 2016, defendants Cheng and Zhang were apprehended by the public security authorities. After being brought to justice, defendants Cheng and Zhang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts of the case. The stolen electric car has been recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. During the court trial, defendants Cheng and Zhang raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are supported by a report of the incident, a site map of the crime scene, a list of items seized and returned, records and photos of the defendants identifying the crime scene, identification records, a price appraisal, the statement of the victim Yang, a report on the case resolution by the public security authorities, the defendants' household registration information, administrative penalty decision documents, and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that: On the early morning of July 3, 2015, the defendants Li and Wu, after assisting patrol officers in their police duties and changing into civilian clothes, conspired to exploit the guise of law enforcement to investigate illegal activities for personal gain. They went to the entrance of the Shunxin Hotel on South Road, a certain city, where they discovered the victim, Xiao (female, Vietnamese), who was suspected of being a prostitute. Li and Wu claimed to be officers from the Public Security Bureau and stated that they would take Xiao into custody. They then took the victim Xiao to Huaguoshan Park in the city, where they intimidated and threatened her, forcibly extorting an Apple 5 phone and 1,100 yuan in cash from her. According to a city price appraisal center, the value of the phone was 1,410 yuan. It was also found that on July 7 and July 23, 2015, respectively, the defendants Li and Wu turned themselves in to the Lingcheng Police Station of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau, returning the extorted phone and 1,100 yuan in cash to the police, who then returned them to the victim Xiao. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Wu during the trial, and were supported by an incident registration form, statements from the victim Xiao, records of on-site identification by defendants Li and Wu, mutual identification records and photos between the defendants and the victim Xiao, a list of seized items and returned items, a price appraisal report from the city’s price appraisal center (Beijian Gong (2015) No. 193), as well as explanations, household registration information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that between October 2012 and November 8, 2012, at the \"Dianwan Dongman\" game arcade located at No. 28 Wangfujing Commercial Street, Lufa Mingcheng, a district in a certain city, the defendants Li, Guo, Jing, and Liu (to be tried in a separate case) operated with the intent of making a profit by placing 22 gambling-capable electronic gaming machines for people to gamble. Additionally, it was found that on January 22, 2013, defendant Jing voluntarily surrendered to the police. After being apprehended, defendants Li and Guo truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li, Guo, and Jing during the court proceedings, and were supported by physical evidence including photos of the gambling-capable gaming machines; documentary evidence such as the household registration certificates of the three defendants, inventory lists of seized items, fugitive registration forms, house rental contracts, renovation permits, renovation management service agreements, and renovation safety responsibility statements; testimonies from witnesses Sun, Liu, and Xu; arrest reports and case explanations provided by investigators; assessment opinions determining the gambling capability of the electronic gaming facilities and equipment; and identification and inspection records. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jing": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that the defendants Li and Hu, together with Liu (handled in a separate case), used the pretexts of not having seen the land acquisition agreement and not having received compensation for land acquisition, without valid reasons. They employed methods such as blocking workers from construction, climbing in front of bulldozers to prevent construction machinery from entering the site, and other means. They repeatedly and without cause obstructed Jiafuxin Company's normal construction activities on January 7, 2015, January 8, 2015, and February 11, 2015. They also repeatedly pushed over the color steel tile fences built by Jiafuxin Company, causing significant losses to the company and severely affecting the work and life of Ren (Chairman of Jiafuxin Company) and the normal business operations of the company. According to the appraisal, the actions of Li and Hu caused direct losses of 1,575 yuan (due to the color steel tiles being pushed over) and indirect losses of 19,000 yuan (including excavator and work stoppage fees) to Jiafuxin Company. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of the victim, Xiangcheng Jafuxin Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.'s legal representative, Ren, the testimonies of witnesses such as Guo, appraisal opinions, on-site investigations, identification records, Xiangcheng Jiafuxin Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.'s business license and copy, tax registration, provisional qualification certificate for real estate development enterprises, land acquisition agreement and sketch, proof and power of attorney from Xiangcheng Land Reserve Development Center, statements and payment slips issued by Xiangcheng Huayuan Office, demolition notices, case filing approval forms from Xiangcheng Chengjiao Township Planning Management Office, delivery document photos, illegal construction photos, and video screenshots of the defendants obstructing construction, among other evidence, sufficient to confirm the findings.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged: In September 2013, defendants Pan and Zhang rented a house by the roadside in a village in Xinchang County and decided to install a production line in the house to produce capsules. Subsequently, defendant Pan contacted and purchased equipment to set up and test the production line and, through online searches, contacted a gelatin manufacturer in a certain location to purchase 75 kilograms of industrial gelatin. In February 2014, production officially began, with defendant Pan responsible for dissolving the gelatin and Zhang responsible for overseeing the production line. They produced a total of 6.89 million capsules in red-yellow, blue-white, and all-green 0 sizes, which were stored at their home at 50 Huayuan Road, Ru’ao Town, Xinchang County. Pan later contacted several health product merchants multiple times, but the capsules were not sold. On March 6, 2014, defendants Pan and Zhang were apprehended by the police, who seized the aforementioned capsules, capsule shells, and gelatin. Tests showed that the chromium content in the capsules and gelatin exceeded the relevant standards. To prove the above facts, the prosecution provided witness testimonies, test reports, and relevant documentary evidence.", "label": {"Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of January 14, 2013, the defendant Ran, due to a trivial matter, gathered the defendants Tian, Sun, Tan, and Zhou, and drove a van to the entrance of the New Congress KTV on Yangming Street in this city. There, they took the victim, Pan, into the van and drove near the Lianghui Reservoir and other places, using verbal threats to extort 3,000 RMB from the victim. As the victim did not have cash, the five defendants, including Ran, drove the victim back to the entrance of the New Congress KTV on Yangming Street in this city to get the money, where they were caught by the police on the spot. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Ran, Tian, Sun, Tan, and Zhou during the trial, and are substantiated by documentary evidence such as the \"capture process\" record, personal information, household registration proof, the witness testimony of Mao, the victim statement of Pan, and the identification record of the Yuyao Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ran": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at approximately 14:00 on March 21, 2014, the defendants Zheng and Luo were driving a truck past the XX warehouse at Yiwu Port when they noticed a package placed in front of the warehouse. Defendant Zheng then drove the truck to provide cover while defendant Luo got out of the vehicle and loaded the package onto the truck. The two subsequently hid the package in a warehouse on the first floor of Building XX, Unit 1, Houfu Community, Beiyuan Street, in a certain city. The stolen package had been left in front of the XX warehouse at Yiwu Port by the victim, Li, containing 27 bags of cuffs, with an assessed value of 14,173 RMB. The stolen goods have since been recovered and returned to the victim. The facts of the case, to which the defendants Zheng and Luo raised no objections during the trial, are substantiated by evidence, including the list of seized items, the list of returned items, the notice of evidence collection, the list of evidence materials received, identification documents, the arrest record, testimonies from witnesses Jiang and Sun, a statement from the victim Li, a price appraisal report, the scene identification transcript, video surveillance footage, as well as the confessions of the defendants Zheng and Luo, all sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 3 a.m. on July 16, 2014, after premeditation, defendants Shi and Liu went to the entrance of an internet cafe on Qingdao Road, Shuiji Subdistrict Office, Laixi City, where they stole a white \"Wangcheng\" brand two-wheeled motorcycle from the victim, Li Mouying. According to the appraisal, it was valued at 7,200 RMB. To substantiate the above facts, the prosecution presented to the court the report records, details of the arrest, the appraisal opinion, relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions, household registration proofs, and other evidence.", "label": {"Shi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: At around 5 a.m. on December 15, 2015, defendant Li contacted defendant Wang and asked him to pick up students from a certain kindergarten. On the same day, at around 7 a.m., Wang was driving a small van with the license plate Anhui S×××××, carrying teachers and students, and was intercepted by traffic police while traveling on Yingbin Avenue in a certain county. Upon investigation, the vehicle was found to have a seating capacity of 7 people but was actually carrying 24 people, exceeding the limit by 242%. Li is the person in charge of a certain kindergarten in a township of the county. The prosecution presented relevant documentary evidence, identification records, witness testimonies, audio-visual materials, and the defendants’ confessions and defenses, believing that the actions of defendants Wang and Li violated item (3), section 2 of article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. They should be held criminally responsible for x crime and requested the court to sentence them according to law. Defendants Wang and Li did not object to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. Upon examination, it was found that at around 5 a.m. on December 15, 2015, defendant Li (the person in charge of a certain kindergarten) contacted defendant Wang to pick up students. On the same day, at around 7 a.m., Wang was driving a small van with the license plate Anhui S×××××, carrying teachers and students, and was intercepted by the duty police officers from the traffic police brigade of the Public Security Bureau of a certain county at a kilometer mark on Yingbin Avenue in the county. Upon investigation, the vehicle was found to have a seating capacity of 7 but was actually carrying 24 people, including 22 students, exceeding the limit by 242%. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the case acceptance form, records of the arrival process, driver information inquiry results, household registration certificates, criminal record inquiry results, documentary evidence, identification records, audio-visual materials, the testimony of witness Yang, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Li, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on November 12, 2014, at around 1 PM, the defendant Ceng, in collusion with the defendant Ke, sold a small package of methamphetamine weighing 0.4 grams for 100 RMB to an individual named Li at Ceng's temporary residence located at Room 505, No. 448, Huizhan Road, Siming District, of this city. They were apprehended by the police on the spot. The transaction money, drugs (already processed by the police according to law), mobile phones used for contacting, electronic scales, bongs, tin foil, and plastic bags were also seized. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Ceng and Ke during the court trial. There were confessions made before the court hearing, testimony by witness Li, identification records by relevant parties, records and photographs of the seized drugs, money, mobile phones, electronic scales, bongs, tin foil, and plastic bags, inventory of seized items, weighing records, the \"Drug Test Report\" from Xiamen Public Security Bureau, and receipts for the submission of drug samples to a provincial authority. Communication records, detailed descriptions of the arrest process and investigation work, and evidence of Ceng's and Ke’s previous criminal records and household registration information confirmed these findings and are sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ke": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that defendant Feng, due to inability to repay external debts, conspired with defendant Ma to rent a car from a car rental company and then pawn it to repay the debts. On June 18, 2014, defendants Feng and Ma went to Pingyi Hongda Leasing Company, signed a lease contract, and fraudulently obtained a Hyundai car with the license plate number Lu Q××××× from Zhao. The two defendants later pawned the car to Li in a certain town for the price of 16,000 yuan. Feng kept 15,000 yuan and gave Ma 1,000 yuan. According to an assessment, the car was valued at 28,000 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendants Feng and Ma truthfully confessed their criminal conduct. It was also found that defendant Feng had reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhao regarding civil compensation. Feng compensated Zhao with 35,000 yuan for the car and rental fees (already paid), and victim Zhao forgave the criminal conduct of defendants Feng and Ma. The aforementioned facts are supported by the statements of victim Zhao, the testimony of witness Li, the car rental contract provided by the Public Security Bureau, the valuation report of the involved items, the incident report, household registration information, and the confessions of the two defendants during the investigation. The two defendants also raised no objections during the court trial, which is sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused defendants Xiang, He, Tao, Su, and Yang. On the evening of September 6, 2014, defendant Xiang had a dispute with Qin, a certain person, while showing a movie in a village in the local chemical district. Xiang then called defendants He, Tao, and Liu (handled separately) for assistance. Defendants He and Tao arrived and had a confrontation with Qin and Xiang A, whom Qin had invited to mediate. Subsequently, defendant Tao called Liu to inform him of the situation. Liu then invited defendants Su and Yang and instructed defendant He to prepare machetes and other tools. Defendant Yang drove a van to transport Liu and the five defendants to the street snack stall at the entrance of Liming Community, Baijixinfu, Baiyushan Street, in this district. Liu, along with defendants He, Tao, and Su, got off the van and chased after Xiang A, Qin, a certain person, and others who were having a late night snack with machetes. During the altercation, Liu and defendants He and Tao injured Xiang A, causing scalp lacerations, a tear-off fracture of the skull's outer plate, a split fracture of the right tibia cortex, multiple skin lacerations across the body, and cumulative body surface scar length of 44.3 cm. Afterwards, defendant Yang drove Liu and defendants He, Tao, and Su away from the scene, while defendant Xiang took Xiang A to the hospital for treatment. According to the forensic identification by Wuhan Ping'an Forensic Institution, Xiang A's injury", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment"], "Su": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on November 15, 2015, Ling deceived Miu from a certain area into coming to a certain county under the pretense of introducing her to work as a nanny in the mainland. During the journey, Ling contacted the defendant Sheng. Sheng brought Ling and Miu home to meet Liu. Due to the language barrier, Sheng and Liu communicated with Miu through Ling. Despite knowing that Miu was from a certain area and unaware of her real intention for coming to the county, the defendants Sheng and Liu paid Ling a total of 57,000 yuan in cash and remittances to keep Miu as a wife for Liu. Sheng then withheld Miu's ID card and travel permit. It was also found that after the incident, the public security authorities transferred Miu through the joint anti-trafficking office in Ruili to the anti-trafficking officer for the region in Muse. The facts of the case were undisputed by the defendants Liu and Sheng during the court trial. These facts were corroborated by evidence including household registration certificates, the transfer documents of the anti-trafficking case between the two countries, explanatory notes, witness testimonies, on-site inspection records, identification transcripts, evidence retrieval documents, evidence receipt lists, and return lists, which are sufficient for the conclusion.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Maonan District in a certain city charged that at about 22:00 on April 14, 2014, the defendant Liao, on the grounds that friends Li Moumou and Ya Moumou were arrested and punished by the police station due to drug use and suspecting informant Mo Moumou of tipping off, colluded with defendant Lin, Li Moumou (handled in a separate case), and others to forcibly take informant Mo Moumou into a car on a section of Huaxi Street in a certain city. They took Mo Moumou to the home of Li Moumou at the Aiqun Committee in a certain town, a certain residence in the town, Room 902 of Guanyi Hotel, and to an abandoned orchard cement house in a certain town for illegal detention. It was not until 18:00 on April 16, 2014, that informant Mo Moumou escaped. During the illegal detention of Mo Moumou, defendants Liao, Lin, and others assaulted Mo Moumou, forcing Mo Moumou to admit to tipping off, leading to Li Moumou and Lin being arrested by the police, and forced Mo Moumou to write an IOU of thirty thousand yuan to Liao. According to the identification, Mo Moumou suffered multiple soft tissue injuries all over his body, with the injuries reaching the level of minor injury.", "label": {"Liao": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Since March 2012, defendant Yang, in collusion with defendants Wei and Zhu (in another case), committed over ten thefts by having Wei drive a car while Yang and Zhu climbed over walls to enter construction sites. They stole more than 3,000 construction fasteners. According to the appraisal, each stolen fastener is valued at 3.4 yuan, with a total value exceeding 10,000 yuan. After the thefts, the two defendants sold most of the stolen fasteners at low prices to You, who was operating a recycling business for scrap items and has been convicted. You knowingly acquired the stolen fasteners. Wei and others squandered all the illicit proceeds. Defendant Wei, with the help of his family, returned 10,000 yuan of stolen money, which was then returned to the victim by the police. The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality requested that, in accordance with Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, defendants Yang and Wei be convicted of X crime. Defendants Yang and Wei did not contest the charges by the People's Procuratorate and pleaded guilty, requesting leniency. The facts established through the hearing were consistent with those charged by the prosecution, and hereby confirmed by this court. It was also determined that defendant Yang surrendered on September 19, 2012, and was put under house arrest the following day. Due to his failure to truthfully confess, he was officially arrested on December 9 of the same year. Defendant Wei was apprehended on September 29, 2012, criminally detained on the same day, and officially arrested on October 30 of the same year. The facts above were not contested by the defendants during the trial, and they were corroborated by evidence presented by the prosecution, including the crime registration form, case filing decision, documents on coercive measures against the defendants, the circumstances of the defendants' arrest, the statements of victims Lan, Wan, Dai, Li Jia, Hu, and Xu, the testimonies of witnesses Li Yi, Xia, and Lu, site inspection data, price appraisal conclusions, defendant's identification records, explanations of identified objects, the seizure and return of items list by the Luzhou Public Security Bureau, and the defendants' confessions and defenses, and were sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Chen, Gan, and Zhang have no objection to the facts charged by the public prosecution, but they request leniency. The facts of the case found by this Court are consistent with the content of the charges by the public prosecution. The evidence proving the above facts includes: 1) documentary evidence such as household registration information, arrest procedures, seizure lists, and statements of circumstances; 2) testimonies from witnesses such as Jin, Zou, and Zhang; 3) statements and defenses from the defendants Chen, Gan, and Zhang; 4) examination records and identification records. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in early August 2016, the defendant Yang rented a storefront next to a supermarket in a certain district of a certain city to the defendant Guan for 1,000 yuan per month for the purpose of placing gambling machines for others to gamble. During August 2016, the defendant Guan gradually placed two gambling machines (with a total of 14 individual operation units) in the storefront for others to gamble, and paid Yang 1,000 yuan in rent and a 500 yuan deposit. At approximately 7:50 PM on August 29, 2016, police officers from the public security bureau of a certain district arrived at the location and arrested the staff member Yang and participants in the gambling, including Wang, and seized two gambling machine motherboards and gambling funds totaling 1,270 yuan on the spot. The security patrol unit of the public security bureau of a certain district identified them as 14 gambling machines. On September 1, 2016, officers from the security patrol unit of the public security bureau of a certain district lawfully summoned the defendant Yang to the case; on September 6, 2016, the defendant Guan voluntarily surrendered to the security patrol unit of the public security bureau of a certain district. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Guan and Yang during the trial and were confirmed by their confessions at the public security agency, the process of how they were brought to the case, the administrative penalty decision, the list of confiscated items, population information inquiry, testimonies of witnesses Yang, Wang, Zou, and Min, identification records, the gambling machine identification report, site photos, and other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Guan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that the victim Liu M received a deceptive internet recruitment from a pyramid scheme organization and arrived by train in a certain city of a certain province at around 16:00 on March 24, 2015, and was taken by members of the pyramid scheme to room 705 in a certain district of the city, a pyramid scheme den. The victim Liu M was beaten by pyramid scheme personnel \"Liu Y\", \"Tong Mm\", and the defendant Yan and others for refusing to join the pyramid scheme. Later, to force the victim Liu M to join the pyramid scheme, the defendant Yan instructed defendants Xiao, Guo, and Niu to illegally deprive the victim Liu M's personal freedom through threats, intimidation, corporal punishment, and brainwashing sessions. At 13:00 on March 25, 2015, the public security authorities rescued the victim Liu M from the pyramid scheme den in room 705 in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province. According to the evaluation by the Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province, the injuries of the victim Liu M were classified as minor injuries.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: In September 2015, defendant Wen sold drugs worth 200 yuan and 300 yuan respectively on two occasions in front of the Huaguo Hotel in a certain city to drug user Li. On one day in October 2015, defendant Yao assisted Wen in selling drugs worth 300 yuan in front of the Huaguo Hotel to drug user Li. To substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to the court, asserting that the actions of defendants Wen and Yao constitute the crime of x, and recommending a sentence of more than three years and less than four years imprisonment for defendant Wen, along with a fine, and a sentence of more than six months and less than eighteen months imprisonment for defendant Yao, along with a fine. They request punishment according to Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Wen and Yao have no objections to the facts and evidence charged by the prosecution. Upon examination, it was found that one day in September 2015, defendant Wen went to the front of the Huaguo Hotel in a certain city, selling drugs worth 200 yuan (ketamine, K powder) to drug user Li; one evening in September of the same year, defendant Wen again went to the same location, selling drugs worth 300 yuan of \"K powder\" to Li; and in October 2015, defendant Yao went to the same location, helping defendant Wen sell drugs worth 300 yuan of \"K powder\" to user Li. On November 5, 2015, the police arrested defendants Wen and Yao, and confiscated suspicious drugs weighing 1.2 grams, an electronic scale, and a weighing container from defendant Wen. The Yangjiang Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center confirmed that the confiscated suspicious drugs contained 1.2g of ketamine (K powder). Defendants Wen and Yao did not dispute the aforementioned facts during the trial, and the facts are corroborated by the case registration form, the decision to file a case, household registration certificates, the arrest report, inspection records, seizure decision, seizure list, seizure record, stolen goods recovery record, identification photos, scene identification, scene investigation record, scene identification record, call records, statements, appraisal, witness Li’s testimony, identification records, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: 1. Between April 2016 and August 3, 2016, defendants Zhou and Wang conspired to set up seven gambling machines for others to gamble at the China Sports Lottery store No. 45 in the commercial plaza of a certain district in this city operated by defendant Wang. They profited over RMB 17,000, of which defendant Zhou received over RMB 10,000 and defendant Wang received over RMB 7,000. 2. Between April 2016 and August 3, 2016, defendants Zhou and Yin conspired to set up two gambling machines for others to gamble at the China Welfare Lottery store on a certain road in a certain district in this city operated by defendant Yin. They profited over RMB 18,000, with each defendant Zhou and Yin receiving over RMB 9,000. In June of the same year, defendant Yin individually set up another gambling machine in his store for others to gamble. After the incident, defendant Zhou voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his crime. Defendant Zhou returned illegal gains of RMB 20,000, defendant Wang returned illegal gains of RMB 8,000, and defendant Yin returned illegal gains of RMB 10,000. These facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou, Wang, and Yin during the trial, and were sufficiently supported by evidence including witness testimonies from Shen, Yan, Wang1, Yang, Ge, Chen, and others, as well as the seizure warrant, seizure list, account book, inspection records, photographs, etc.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. In the early morning of September 13, 2008, defendants Wang and Zhu came to No. 68 Yongning Road, Chashan Street, a certain district of a certain city, and stole 50,000 yuan in cash from the victim Jia. 2. Around 2 a.m. on March 29, 2013, defendant Wang came to the vicinity of No. 22 Beiwangyi Road in a certain economic development zone and stole two mobile phones (appraised at 1,900 yuan) from the victim Zhang in a dormitory of a factory. On February 17, 2014, defendant Wang voluntarily went to the public security organ to surrender and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. During the court trial, defendants Wang and Zhu had no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victims Jia and Zhang, the testimony of witness Peng, the identification record and photos, on-site investigation records and photos, evidence receipt lists and surveillance footage, price appraisal report, confession recognition report, situation explanation, arrest process document, population information, criminal judgment, criminal archive materials, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that at the end of December 2019, the defendants Li and Hui, on the grounds of Liu (person 1) having an inappropriate sexual relationship with his wife Yang, threatened to ruin his reputation and expose him to his family to extort money from Liu. Subsequently, Liu was forced to agree to pay 250,000 RMB. The two defendants continued to threaten and intimidate Liu via WeChat. On January 6, 2020, at a China Bank in the Hexi District of Tianjin, Liu paid Li and Hui 100,000 RMB. On June 8 of the same year, near a certain location, defendants Li and Hui were arrested by public security officers while trying to extort the remaining 150,000 RMB, unsuccessfully. In support of the above accusations, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including WeChat chat records, bank transfer records, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, the defendants' confessions, identification records, case origin, and the details of the arrest.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Based on the trial findings, around 12:00 a.m. on August 2, 2014, the defendants Chen and Liang were involved in an incident where Chen was driving a moped without a license plate, carrying Liang as a passenger. The defendants went to the section of Zhonggang Road in Yuzhou District, in front of the Shimeixiangfen Health Club. Chen drove close to a person named Zhang, who was riding an electric bicycle, while Liang snatched a red handbag from the stomach area of a person named Song. The stolen bag contained over seventy yuan in cash, twenty Hong Kong dollars, bank cards, and a Xiaomi 3 mobile phone belonging to Zhang. Chen and Liang later sold the stolen phone, obtaining 800 yuan, which they split equally. According to the Yulin City Price Certification Center's appraisal, the value of the stolen phone was 1,391 yuan. During the trial, defendants Chen and Liang did not object to these facts. Additional evidence supporting these findings includes the case registration form, arrest process report, on-site identification records and photos, seizure decision document, seizure list, return of items document list, electric bicycle invoice, inspection certificate, extraction records, household registration proof, Xiaomi phone shopping receipt, interrogation records of Song and Zhang, Chen's interrogation record, and Yulin City Price Certification Center's Price Appraisal Certificate No. (2014) 436, all of which are sufficient for establishing the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3:00 PM on January 21, 2015, defendant Gao, who was upset over losing money gambling and suspected the victim, Zeng, of cheating at poker, arranged with defendant Xiao and Xiao A (handled in a separate case) to take the victim Zeng by car from the front of Jianshun Auto Repair Shop on Hong Kong Road in a certain district of this city to the embankment behind the Xinrong Village long-distance bus station in the same district. There, they used means of verbal abuse and physical assault to forcibly take 4,700 RMB in cash from the victim Zeng. The next day, defendant Gao was apprehended by public security when he returned to Hong Kong Road to demand money from the victim Zeng. After being brought to justice, defendant Gao assisted the police by notifying defendant Xiao to appear. The stolen money in this case has been recovered and returned to the victim. In support of the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution read out and presented evidence in court, including photographs of physical evidence; documentation of the arrest and case solving by the public security; identification documents; an administrative penalty decision notice; seizure records and lists; a letter of understanding; the victim's statement; identification records; and confessions from the defendants.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that in the early morning of June 13, 2014, the defendants Tang and Zhou rode a bicycle to various locations including Jinqiao South Road and Guihua West Road in Fuchun Street of this city. Using methods such as prying open windows and climbing through windows, they committed theft on three occasions, stealing items including cigarettes, computers, and cash, with a total value of RMB 39,728. After the incident, some of the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. Details are as follows: 1. In the early morning of June 13, 2014, the defendants Tang and Zhou went to No. 128 Guihua West Road in Fuchun Street of this city. Defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Tang climbed through a window to enter the K潮 Children's Clothing Store operated by Hong. They stole approximately RMB 1,000 in cash and a black Lenovo laptop (valued at RMB 5,510), totaling approximately RMB 6,510. 2. In the same early morning, the defendants Tang and Zhou went to No. 71-8 Jinqiao South Road in Fuchun Street. Defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Tang pried open a window to enter the Tianjin Tobacco and Liquor Store operated by Wang, stealing a batch of cigarettes and liquor with a total value of RMB 27,473. 3. In the same early morning, the defendants Tang and Zhou went to No. 5-2 Jinqiao South Road in Fuchun Street. Defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Tang used the same method to enter the Fuchun Clinic, stealing RMB 2,800 in cash and a Lenovo all-in-one computer (valued at RMB 2,945), with a total value of RMB 5,745. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution read out and presented relevant evidence in court to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that in October 2012, the defendant Fang, together with Wu B (already sentenced), set up a gambling operation successively at a certain location in Wujing Community, a town in a certain city, and at Beautify Garden Building 10, Unit 1, Room 202, the residence of the defendant Wu. They gathered Tang, Gao, Yang, and others to gamble five times using the \"Tongzigong\" method. Wu A (already sentenced) was responsible for shuffling the cards, and they collectively profited more than 8,200 yuan through commissions. \n\nOn the nights of November 2, 3, 5, 6, and the afternoon of the 7th of the same month, Chen, together with the defendant Wu, set up a gambling operation at Room 102, No. 19-1, Old Hospital Dormitory, in a town of a certain city. They gathered Tang, Liu, and others to gamble five times using the \"Tongzigong\" method. Wu B was responsible for contacting participants, while Wu A was responsible for shuffling the cards, illegally profiting a total of more than 7,000 yuan through commissions.\n\nThe defendants raised no objections to the above criminal facts during the court hearing. There is supporting evidence provided by accomplice testimonies, witness statements, inspection records, the list of seized items, accomplice criminal judgments, police administrative penalty decisions, arrest details, and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between January and March 2015, the defendant Lin, either alone or in collusion with Zhang, repeatedly allowed Gao, Guan, and Zhang Jia to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) at a rented property located in Unit **, Building **, ** Community, ** City. Specifically, the incidents are as follows: 1. On a day in January 2015, defendants Lin and Zhang allowed Gao to use methamphetamine. 2. On a day in mid-February 2015, defendants Lin and Zhang allowed Gao to use methamphetamine. 3. On March 4, 2015, defendants Lin and Zhang allowed Gao to use methamphetamine. 4. On a day in the lunar first month of 2015, defendant Lin allowed Guan to use methamphetamine. 5. On a day in the lunar first month of 2015, defendant Lin allowed Zhang Jia to use methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin and Zhang and their defense during the trial. They are corroborated by physical evidence seizure lists, written case registration forms, case handling descriptions, arrest reports, criminal judgment documents, administrative penalty decision documents, household registration information, testimonies from witnesses such as Gao and Guan, and on-site testing reports from the Public Security Bureau of ** City, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On March 2 and March 4, 2015, the defendant Wu respectively allowed Wang, Zhang to use methamphetamine in his rented apartment located on the 27th floor of Jindi Junyuan in this district. In February 2015, the defendant Zhang respectively allowed Jiang, Wang, Wu to use methamphetamine in his rented apartment located on the 27th floor of Jindi Junyuan in this district.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that starting from March 9, 2016, the defendants Zhao and Fang provided gambling tools, including playing cards and dice, to organize gambling activities for others in a room on the seventh floor at 204 Yulin Road, Shishi City, and profited by taking a cut from the bets. Defendant Fang was hired to handleskimming in the casino. On the 12th of the same month, law enforcement officers uncovered this casino, arresting defendants Zhao and Fang along with 17 other gamblers on the spot. They seized 16,180 RMB in gambling money, 8,200 RMB in illegal profits, 40 playing cards, and 3 dice. It was further found that the 16,180 RMB in gambling money seized on site was confiscated by the Shishi City Public Security Bureau. During the operation of the casino, Zhao illegally earned 14,000 RMB (including the 8,200 RMB seized on site), while Fang illegally earned 600 RMB. The above facts were not contested by Zhao and Fang during the trial and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Deng, Wen, Li, Liao, Qiu, Huang (甲), Zhang, Cai, Wang, Huang (乙), Li, Tian, Liu, Tang, Liu, Gao, and Long, as well as on-site photos, inspection records, identification records, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, evidence preservation decision documents, evidence preservation lists, administrative penalty decisions, lists of confiscated items, criminal judgment, certificate of release after serving the sentence, work statements by the public security organ, population information, and the confessions of defendants Zhao and Fang. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 16:00 on June 27, 2012, the defendant Lv, under the instructions of the defendant Ye, with the intent to profit, sold three books of general quota invoices from the Zhejiang Provincial Local Taxation Bureau, totalling 151 invoices, to Sun in the restroom of the lobby of Jindu Hotel, Jiaogong Road, Xihu District, in this city for 300 yuan. They were caught red-handed by the public security authorities. Upon appraisal, all 199 invoices were counterfeit. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Ye and Lv during the court proceedings, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Sun, Jiang, and Zhang, along with the identification records, list of seized items and photos, household registration certificates, the account of the arrest, and the invoice appraisal results certificate, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lv": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Wu, Zou, Chen, Guo, and Fu have no objections to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution. The facts of the case as determined by the court are consistent with the charges brought by the prosecution, and the court confirms this. The evidence supporting the above facts includes: testimonies from witnesses Wu, Zou, Chen, Guo, Fu, among others; testimonies from witnesses Tan, Zhang, Hu, and others; identification records; records of capture, household registration certificates, lists of seized items, and restitution documents. Furthermore, the confessions of defendants Wu, Zou, Chen, Guo, and Fu corroborate the aforementioned evidence, making it sufficient for determination. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain people's procuratorate charged that on the evening of October 14, 2015, police officers from the Suichuan County Public Security Bureau intercepted defendants Zhong and Lan on their way back from hunting. The officers seized two bird guns, two bags of steel balls (totaling 38 pieces), two bottles of powder (approximately 60 grams each), and two bottles of red powder from the defendants. Investigation revealed that defendants Zhong and Lan had both been in possession of one bird gun each for a long time without obtaining a gun permit. According to the appraisal, the bird guns possessed by defendants Zhong and Lan were homemade black powder guns that used gunpowder as a propellant to fire metal projectiles and were capable of causing injury. After being apprehended, defendants Zhong and Lan truthfully confessed their crimes. During the court hearing, defendants Zhong and Lan did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which were corroborated by appraisal opinions, documentary evidence, and physical evidence (photographs), providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Detention"], "Lan": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 5:00 PM on October 24, 2012, the defendants Zhou and Wei, together with \"Chen\" (handled in a separate case), after premeditating, went to the basement parking lot of the Women's and Children's Hospital on Hongli Road in a certain district of this city to steal. Zhou and Wei were responsible for looking out, while \"Chen\" pried open the trunk of the victim Xu's car and stole a laptop, a digital camera, and a camera lens from inside the trunk (after appraisal, the total value was 9,648 RMB). On the evening of November 18, 2012, the defendants Zhou and Wei, together with Cao (handled in a separate case), after premeditating, went to the parking lot of the Xiangmihu Resort in a certain district of this city to steal. Zhou and Wei were responsible for looking out, while Cao pried open the trunk of the victim Zhang's car and stole four bottles of Maotai and two bottles of Wuliangye (after appraisal, the total value was 8,800 RMB) from inside the trunk. On November 21, 2012, the defendants Zhou and Wei were apprehended and brought to justice.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate accused that on November 19, 2016, at approximately 4:15 a.m., defendants Xiao and Du, along with others, without cause, assaulted the victim Liu near Tonghai Hotel on Kangshen Road, Zhoupu Town, in this district. This resulted in contusion to Liu's left eye, as well as retinal and choroidal tears to the left eye. Upon examination, it was found that the victim Liu's corrected vision in the left eye was 0.02, matching the criteria for Level 3 blindness in the left eye, constituting a Level 2 serious injury. On March 13, 2017, defendant Du was apprehended by public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. On March 14, 2017, defendant Xiao went to the Zhoupu Police Station of the Pudong Branch of the Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau to deliver breakfast to defendant Du and was subsequently apprehended by police officers, after which he truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. Following the incident, defendant Du, with the help of his family, compensated the victim Liu 75,000 RMB and obtained forgiveness. During the trial of this court, defendant Xiao, with the assistance of friends and relatives, separately compensated the victim Liu 75,000 RMB and obtained forgiveness. The victim Liu requested that the two defendants be given probation. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Du during the court trial, and were supported by evidence confirmed in court, including the victim Liu’s written statement and identification records, surveillance videos and screenshots, injury examination notices, the supplementary appraisal opinion from Shanghai Fenglin Forensic Science Institute, letters of forgiveness, basic information on permanent residents, detailed information from police business archive cards, materials provided by public security authorities on the occurrence of the case and the capture process, and the defendants Xiao and Du's confession records, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Du": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On December 4, 2015, the defendants Wang and Zhang, after prior conspiracy, drove a van to a roadside in front of the village committee of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city, and using the method of a wire loop around the neck, stole a local dog owned by the victim Zhu, valued at 153 RMB; 2. On December 4, 2015, the defendants Wang and Zhang, after prior conspiracy, drove a van to a roadside of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city, and using the method of a wire loop around the neck, stole a local dog owned by the victim Li, valued at 225 RMB; 3. On the noon of December 7, 2015, the defendants Wang and Zhang, after prior conspiracy, drove a van to the roadside going north from the east bridge of Mingxing Village, a certain town in a certain district of a certain city, and using methods such as a wire loop around the neck, stole a local dog owned by the victim Xie, valued at 270 RMB; 4. On the morning of December 8, 2015, the defendants Wang and Zhang, after prior conspiracy, drove a van to the side of a toilet at the entrance of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city, and using the method of a wire loop around the neck, stole a local dog owned by the victim Yan, valued at 218 RMB; 5. On the morning of December 8, 2015, the defendants Wang and Zhang, after prior conspiracy, drove a van to the h", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On the morning of March 21, 2015, defendant Ding, together with defendant Zhang, after premeditation, carried hydraulic pliers and went to the bicycle parking area at the east gate of the Yinzuo Shopping Mall in Kuiwen District, Weifang City. They used the hydraulic pliers to cut the iron chain lock and steal a Flying Pigeon brand colored electric bicycle. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at 1,457 RMB. The electric bicycle involved in the case was lawfully seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Zhang during the trial process. The facts are supported by documentary evidence such as the arrest process and population information; the testimony of witness Zhong; the statement of the victim Feng; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; and the appraisal opinion and valuation conclusion document of the involved items by a certain province.", "label": {"Ding": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On November 2, 2011, the defendant Yao, entrusted by Zhang (already sentenced), through defendants Tang and Wu, purchased from a police station in a certain town, county, and province, a household registration book and ID card for \"Ma Li,\" whose registered residence is in a certain town, county, and province, for 11,000 RMB, for Qu (already sentenced). Qu used these documents for purchasing real estate and registering a company. The defendants Yao, Tang, and Wu each profited 2,000 RMB, 1,000 RMB, and 1,000 RMB, respectively. 2. On May 8, 2012, the defendant Xi, entrusted by Zhang, through Cong (handled in another case), purchased from a police station in a certain town, county, and province, a household registration book and ID card for \"Li,\" whose registered residence is in a certain town, county, and province, for 11,000 RMB, for Qu and Zhao. Zhao used these documents for purchasing real estate. The defendant Xi profited 4,000 RMB from this.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On the evening of August 31, 2015, at around 9 PM, the defendants Xiong and Huo, after premeditation, carried out theft at the third-floor warehouse of the local Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd. Defendant Huo entered the premises to commit the theft, while defendant Xiong acted as the lookout. They stole a total of 1,029 mobile phone display screens and 3,120 integrated circuits, valued at 106,203 RMB. On the evening of September 1, 2015, at around 9 PM, police officers arrested and brought defendants Xiong and Huo to justice. In support of the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented and read aloud the following evidence in court: 1. The process of capturing the suspects and solving the case; 2. Reporting materials; 3. Witness testimonies; 4. Lists of seized and returned items; 5. Case notes and photographs; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. Confessions and defenses of the defendants, etc.", "label": {"Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yubei District in a certain city charges: At about 16:00 on March 4, 2016, defendants Zhou and Liu conspired to commit theft and arrived at the pedestrian crossing on XXX Road in Yubei District, a certain city. Defendant Liu acted as a lookout while defendant Zhou used tweezers to steal a Yitong brand mobile phone valued at 742 yuan from the upper pocket of the victim Liao's jacket. Subsequently, the two defendants, using the same method, stole a ZTE brand mobile phone valued at 313 yuan from the upper pocket of the victim Long's jacket outside the storefront at No. XXX, XX Lane, nearby. While attempting to leave the scene, the two defendants were caught by the police. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhou and Liu truthfully confessed to the theft of mobile phones. The stolen phones have been returned to the victims by the police. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Liu during the court hearing, and they are supported by evidence such as: the registration form of the case, decision to file the case; the capture process; the household information forms of defendants Zhou and Liu; the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhou and Liu; statements of the victims Liao and Long; the identification records; extraction records; the list and decision of seizure; the return of items and respective vouchers; the on-site identification records and photos of the criminal case; the price appraisal conclusion; the criminal judgment No. (2015) Jiufa Xingchuzi No. 00007 by the Jiulongpo District People's Court and the proof of release; the criminal judgment No. (2009) Jiufa Xingchuzi No. 436 by the Jiulongpo District People's Court and the certificate of release upon completion of sentence, etc., are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses: Between late April 2014 and May 23, 2014, defendants Lan, Ji, and Cao set up gambling machines for others to gamble, specifically \"fishing machines\" with the function of cashing out points for gambling at an unlicensed game room on the first floor of Building 22, Area 3, Xinhe, District, in a certain city. They profited illegally by exchanging 100 yuan RMB for 10,000 points, gaining more than 6,000 yuan RMB. After the incident, defendant Lan voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The actions of defendants Lan, Ji, and Cao violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted x crime. Defendant Lan is a repeat offender. A request is made for legal sentencing. These facts are not disputed by defendants Lan, Ji, and Cao during the trial, and are corroborated by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified during the court hearing: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Statements and defenses of defendants Lan, Ji, and Cao; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Zhan, Xu, and Fan; 4. Identification opinion on electronic game equipment; 5. Identification transcripts; 6. Inspection transcripts; 7. On-site identification transcripts and photos; 8. Electronic evidence inspection transcripts; 9. Criminal judgment; 10. Capture process; 11. Process of bringing the case to trial; 12. Administrative punishment decision; 13. Detention decision, etc. This evidence is indeed sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in March 2012, a young man from Anhui, Lu Mouyi, accompanied by relatives and friends, came to a certain city in a certain province, and asked Fan (who has been sentenced) to help him find a woman to marry. Later, Fan conspired with Zhou (who has been sentenced) to bring Lu Mouyi and others to a certain lake, where the defendant Shen pretended to be the bride. Defendant Fan and Li (who is being handled in a separate case) pretended to be Shen's godmother and uncle, respectively, and defrauded Lu Mouyi of 24,800 yuan by means of receiving a bride price and an introduction fee. On March 30, 2012, under the pretext of buying clothes, defendant Shen went with Lu Mouyi to Longkedu Supermarket at a certain lake and escaped while Lu Mouyi was not paying attention. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Fan and Shen during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Lu Mouyi's statements; testimony from witnesses Wang, Zhou, Li, Lu Moujia, Xue, and Yang; the identification record, capture process, case handling statement, restitution record, receipt vouchers; household registration information and the confessions and defenses of defendants Fan and Shen, all of which are sufficient to support the verdict.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on August 29, 2014, defendant Zhang forged a wage IOU with Lei's signature in order to collect a debt from Lei. Zhang instructed defendants Xiao and Liu (who is currently at large) to fabricate claims that they both worked at Lei's peeling factory and that Lei had not paid the workers' wages. They then used the forged wage IOU to accuse Lei at the labor and public security departments. On September 11, 2014, the public security organ filed a case against Lei for allegedly refusing to pay labor remuneration and issued an online warrant for Lei's arrest. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Xiao voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their crimes. These facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Xiao during the trial and are supported by the confessions of the defendants, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, the IOU, labor security inspection complaint registration form, investigation and inquiry transcripts, notice to correct within a time limit, case transfer form for suspected criminal cases, information and registration forms of the fugitive, explanation of surrender, and the identification of both defendants, among other evidence, which is sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention"], "Xiao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Shangyu District in a certain city charged: 1. One evening around September 13, 2015, after prior conspiracy, the defendants Zheng and Zhang, in the parking lot behind the RT-Mart supermarket in Shangyu District of a certain city, stole a pink women's folding bicycle by prying with a knife and smashing the lock with a stone (the aforementioned vehicle has been seized by the public security organ). 2. On the evening of October 9, 2015, after prior conspiracy, the defendants Zheng and Zhang stole a white Merida bicycle, which belonged to the victim Wang, from in front of the Xin Da Tong Shopping Center in Shangyu District of a certain city by prying with a knife and smashing the lock with a stone. 3. On the evening of October 9, 2015, after prior conspiracy, the defendants Zheng and Zhang stole a white Jinyouyuan bicycle, which belonged to the victim Ji, from near the Haobilai Cafeteria on the pedestrian street of Shangyu District in a certain city by prying with a knife and smashing the lock with a stone. In summary, the defendants Zheng and Zhang committed theft on three occasions. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Zheng and Zhang during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by the confessions of defendants Zheng and Zhang, the statements of victims Ji and Wang, identification records and photographs, search records and photographs, explanatory notes, surveillance video, the process of capture, and the basic resident information of both defendants.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in May 2015, the defendants Chen and Ceng repeatedly added non-edible borax during the production of rice dumplings at a home in a certain village, in a certain district, of a certain city, and sold them next to the West Street Market in the district. Approximately 1,300 borax-infused rice dumplings were sold, yielding a profit of about 1,500 yuan. Tests showed that the borax levels in the rice dumpling samples did not meet the standards specified in the \"List of Non-edible Substances and Easily Abused Food Additives Subject to Possible Illegal Addition in Food (Summary of Batches 1-5).\" The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Ceng during the court hearing and were corroborated by the prosecution's in-court presentation and the court's examination of the defendants' confessions, crime scene photographs, testimonies from witnesses Li Yi, Li Bing, Shen Yi, and Huang Yi, identifications and photographs of defendants Chen and Ceng, Huang Yi's identification of the sales slip and photos of the pharmacy he operated, test reports, site inspection records, site diagrams and photographs, evidence lists, case transfer documents, administrative enforcement materials, the apprehension process, and the defendants' household registration information. Defendant Chen did not contest the facts and charges brought by the prosecution and pleaded for leniency. Defense lawyer Kuang argued that defendant Chen is a first-time and occasional offender, who has consistently confessed his crimes truthfully, demonstrated good remorse, and due to only having an elementary education, lacked understanding of the harm caused by borax. Given the short duration and small quantity of borax added to the rice dumplings, and his subsequent voluntary cessation of such conduct, the social harm was minimal, and thus the court should impose a lenient sentence and consider probation. Defendant Ceng did not contest the facts and charges brought by the prosecution and pleaded for leniency. Defense lawyer Luo argued that defendant Ceng is a first-time and occasional offender, with a confession that should be considered for sentencing. He showed good remorse, played a minor role in the case, should be regarded as an accessory, and due to his low educational level, lacked understanding of the harm of borax. Furthermore, the crime was committed over a short duration with minimal social harm, and therefore the court should impose a lenient sentence and consider probation.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local people's procuratorate charged: In December 2012, the defendant Liu and a villager, Tang A (at large), from a certain village committee in a certain town, discussed with others that Tang A and others would purchase an ancient camphor tree, located at Tongwei (a place name) in their village, which was marked and protected by the government (numbered 700). Subsequently, Tang A and the defendant Tang, among others, bought the ancient camphor tree for 20,000 yuan. At the end of December of the same year, without obtaining the necessary logging permits and disregarding the fact that it was a nationally protected ancient tree, the defendants Liu and Tang, together with Tang A, hired laborers and excavator drivers to trim the branches and dig up the stump of the ancient camphor tree. On December 31, staff from the forestry department, upon receiving a report, rushed to Tongwei to stop the activity. In early January 2013, the defendants Liu, Tang, and Tang A once again hired personnel to excavate the ancient camphor tree, sawing off its trunk and branches, and uprooting the stump, subsequently transporting it out of the village and selling it for 108,000 yuan to a person named Chang (nickname Duo) in a certain township (who has been transferred to the local public security organ for processing). According to the appraisal by forestry technicians, the illegally felled and destroyed ancient camphor tree was 300 years old, 38 meters tall, with a circumference of 500 centimeters (diameter of 1.59 meters), and a living volume of 34.1915 cubic meters. On March 12, 2014, the public security organ arrested the defendant Tang. Later, the defendant Tang returned 3,000 yuan of the illicit gains. On May 15, based on the information provided by defendant Tang, the public security organ arrested the defendant Liu. In response to the aforementioned charges, the prosecution submitted relevant evidence materials to this court, including confessions of the two defendants, witness testimonies, appraisal reports, the account of their capture, on-site investigation records, and bank inquiry lists.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: On May 18, 2016, at about 11 a.m., while police officers from the Water Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain county were investigating slot machines placed in Gao's supermarket in a town of that county, defendant Gao bit police officer Wang's arm in order to prevent the investigation. The injury was identified as minor by a forensic doctor from the county's Public Security Bureau. Defendant Xie threatened the law enforcement officers with a wine bottle and a kitchen knife, obstructing them from performing their duties lawfully. These facts were not disputed by defendant Gao and his defender Guo, nor by defendant Xie during the court trial. The case is supported by evidence such as the written documentation of the case acceptance registration form, the command center's police dispatch record, a certificate of previous offenses inquiry, household registration certificates, a list of confiscated items, accounts of how the defendants were brought to justice, situation explanations, testimonies from witnesses Xu, Ma, Jin, and others, a forensic identification report, on-site investigation and inspection records, and a copy of the law enforcement recorder CD. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xie": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on July 28, 2015, at about 19:00, the defendant Liu had an economic dispute with the victim Peng due to a credit card issue. Subsequently, Liu colluded with the defendants Ye, Shen, and Li in Room 3B1220 of the Mindong International building in Hanyang District, Wuhan City. Liu and Ye used violence and other means to restrict Peng's personal freedom in order to demand repayment of the debt. At approximately 23:00 on the same day, police officers arrived at the location, rescued the victim Peng, and arrested the defendants Liu, Ye, Shen, and Li.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Ye": ["Detention"], "Shen": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Chuanshan District, a certain city, charged that the defendant Long was acquainted with the victim Qin. On June 9, 2020, at around 9:00 PM, Long was dining with friends at the \"Jiangguaiguai\" hot pot restaurant on ** Fang Street, Chuanshan District, a certain city. During this time, Qin and friends arrived at the restaurant. Long asked Qin to propose a toast, but Qin refused and left. At around 10:00 PM, Long and the defendant Xiao went to the \"Duoweiyuan\" restaurant on ** Fang Street, Chuanshan District, a certain city to continue dining, where they encountered Qin and friends dining at the nearby \"Xiaohuangyu\" barbecue and night beer shop. Long and Xiao confronted Qin, leading to an argument between the parties, and Long then punched Qin. During the fight, Xiao used a beer bottle and fists to strike Qin's head and face. According to the assessment, Qin sustained a nasal bone fracture, classified as a minor injury of the second degree. On June 16, 2020, Long and Xiao turned themselves in to the public security authorities.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at approximately 9 a.m. on December 6, 2014, the defendants Liu and Yu were on bus route 6 in Wanzhou District, a certain city, when Liu pickpocketed a wallet from the bag of passenger Liu Moumou and handed it to Yu. Both defendants got off at the former Si Police Station bus stop. Liu took more than 600 yuan in cash from the wallet and then discarded it. According to the appraisal by the Wanzhou District Price Certification Center of a certain city, the stolen wallet and its contents were valued at a total of 67 yuan. It was further found that after the incident, the police recovered the stolen wallet and its contents. A relative of defendant Liu compensated the victim Liu Moumou with 620 yuan in cash, and received his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Yu during the court hearing, and were substantiated by documentary evidence such as the case registration form, photos from the scene identification, video screenshots, lists of seized and returned items, arrest details, criminal judgment and release certificates, household registration certificates, the statement of the victim Liu Moumou, the confessions of defendants Liu and Yu, surveillance video, and the Wanzhou Price Appraisal Opinion No. (2014) 439 from the Wanzhou District Price Certification Center of a certain city, sufficient to confirm the charge.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that in August 2016, defendants Sun, Wang, and Dong entered the warehouse of a certain company five times by methods such as climbing through windows and stole 667 compressors stored in the warehouse. According to an appraisal, the total value of these compressors was 169,031 RMB. After the incident, the compressors involved in the case were lawfully seized by the public security organ. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Sun, Wang, and Dong during the court trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the report records and theft reports from witnesses Miao and Wu, detailed production cost of the compressors involved, on-site inspection records, search records, identification records, price appraisal conclusion, administrative penalty decisions, seizure decisions, seizure lists, on-site records, and photos, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local people's procuratorate accused: At approximately 22:00 on June 8, 2015, at the former deer farm yard in Shangyu Village, Xiongguantun Town, Tieling County, the defendant Xu had a dispute with Peng over trivial matters and became discontent. As a result, he gathered the defendants Guo, Wang, Ma, E, and others to lure Peng back to the deer farm yard under the pretense of discussing the matter. During Xu's conversation with Peng, the defendant Guo injured Peng with a wooden stick. Defendants Wang, Ma, and E chased Zhu, who had come with Peng, with wooden sticks but were unsuccessful. E then returned and used a wooden stick to vandalize the van with license plate number Liao M****5 driven by Peng. According to the forensic evaluation, Peng sustained minor injuries of the second degree, and the damaged van had a loss valued at 900 yuan. After the incident, the defendants Guo, E, and Wang voluntarily surrendered, and the civil damages have been compensated. The prosecution submitted evidence to prove the charges, including the case source, the arrest process, statements of voluntary surrender, household registration information, a settlement agreement, explanatory notes, a forensic evaluation report on the human body injuries, an appraisal conclusion on the repair cost, photos of the damaged vehicle, testimonies from witnesses Zhu, Shao, Li, and others, the victim Peng’s statement, and the confessions of defendants Xu, Guo, E, Ma, and Wang.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "E": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution, on the afternoon of January 25, 2016, the defendants Diao and Xue took advantage of the opportunity to steal 2,400 RMB in cash from the victim, Ren, at the HLA clothing store located at 257 National Day Road, Yizheng City. Among them, the defendant Xue was responsible for keeping watch. After the incident, the defendants Diao and Xue truthfully confessed to their criminal activities. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Diao and Xue during the court hearing. Additionally, these facts are substantiated by the victim Ren's statement, recognition records, incident report, criminal judgment, and household registration certificates. This is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Diao": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges, which this court has reviewed and verified, state that at around 10 p.m. on August 2, 2016, defendants Liu and Shang were in the underground parking lot of Sijichun in Lanshan District, a certain city. Because a Bie branded car belonging to Wang A and a Mercedes-Benz car belonging to Wang B were parked in the aisle, blocking their parking space, and they were unable to contact the owners, defendant Liu drove defendant Shang's car to hit the front bumper of the Bie branded car. Subsequently, defendants Liu and Shang used pickaxe handles to smash the front and rear windshields and the left rearview mirror of the Mercedes-Benz car, as well as the front windshield and left rearview mirror of the Bie branded car, causing a total damage value of 26,256 yuan. After the incident, on August 6 and August 7, 2016, defendants Liu and Shang reached settlement agreements with the victims, Wang A and Wang B, compensating Wang A with 8,800 yuan for vehicle damages and Wang B with 50,000 yuan. Victims Wang A and Wang B expressed their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shang and Liu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the statements of victims Wang A and Wang B, expert opinions, the arrest process, residence verification, and other related documentary evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Shang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges that on June 23, 2008, the defendants Zheng and Ma allowed Liu, Shi, and others to engage in prostitution three times in the hair salon they operated located on Nanfeng North Road, Nanfeng Street, in the county. After the crime was discovered, defendant Zheng turned himself in to the public security authorities on December 27, 2012, and defendant Ma did so on February 17, 2013. The defendants Zheng and Ma do not dispute the above facts during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to establish the facts, including testimonies from witnesses Liu, Shi, Xie, Ying, and Hua, identification records, the circumstances of the case, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between July 2013 and July 2014, defendant Liu, knowing that sodium nitrite is harmful to human health, used sodium nitrite purchased by defendant Ren to marinate dog meat under Ren's instructions. During this period, defendant Liu sold the marinated dog meat at the \"Wuyang Residence\" dog meat shop on a certain road in a certain district of a certain city and at a certain market. Defendant Ren sold the marinated dog meat near a residential area in a certain district of a certain city. On July 28, 2014, at around 16:00, defendant Liu was caught by police while selling the marinated dog meat at a certain market in a certain district of a certain city. Testing revealed that the dog meat marinated by defendant Liu contained 67.1mg/kg of nitrites. On July 29, 2014, defendant Ren voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. Further investigation found that after defendant Liu was brought to justice, he truthfully confessed the criminal facts. Defendant Liu and Ren raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are substantiated by testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Yang, Shi, and others; business licenses of individual businesses; on-site detection records, search records, and seizure lists made by the public security bureau of a certain district in a certain city; inspection reports issued by a municipal product quality supervision and inspection center; household registration certifi", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at approximately 5:00 PM on June 1, 2015, the defendants, Meng and Yue, were having a meal and drinking at the Jianghaifu Restaurant on Zhanghong Street. During this time, both rushed to the bar counter to pay the bill. Due to excessive drinking, Meng was unsteady and bumped into Pan Mofeng and others who were dining at Table 1 near the bar counter. Subsequently, Yue and Meng used objects like bottles, tables and chairs, and a water heater to smash the restaurant and assaulted Pan Mofeng, Pan Mozhang, and Pan Mohong, causing injuries of varying degrees to the three individuals. After an assessment by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Xunyi County Public Security Bureau, it was determined that Pan Mofeng's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, Pan Mozhang's injuries were classified as minor, and Pan Mohong waived the forensic appraisal.", "label": {"Yue": ["Imprisonment"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kecheng District, a city, charged that on May 10, 2012, the defendants Yu and Chen, together with Wang A (handled in a separate case), traveled from a city to downtown of a city, conspiring to commit theft. Later, the three went to the residence of the victim, Wang, located at Building 9, Unit 2, Room 401, Lujia Lane, downtown a city. Defendants Yu and Chen kept watch at the stairway entrance while Wang A entered the premises to carry out the theft, stealing items including a laptop, mobile phone, Chunghwa cigarettes, jewelry, jade ornaments, various commemorative notes and coins, stamps, and two gold necklaces. The three then transported the stolen items back to a certain place to sell and shared illicit gains of over 4,000 yuan. According to an appraisal, the stolen HP laptop and Huawei mobile phone were valued at a total of 1,480 yuan; the two cartons of hard pack Chunghwa cigarettes were valued at 720 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were supported by the household registration certificates of the two defendants; the statement of the victim, Wang; the testimony of the witness, Zhao; the confession of the co-offender Wang A; identification records, photo lists of people identified, and identity description of the person identified; photos of the crime scene identified by defendants Yu and Chen; Appraisal Conclusion No. 164 (2012) by a city's price certification center, appraisal conclusion notification; cigarette price verification provided by a city's company of Zhejiang Tobacco Company; apprehension process; list of seized items and documents, photos of the seized items; confessions of defendants Yu and Chen, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 1 AM on June 5, 2015, the defendants Du and Qin, together with Li (handled in a separate case), went to the family housing compound of the Agricultural Bureau on Changqing Road in a certain city. Defendant Qin acted as a lookout while defendants Du and Li used a prying tool to force open the lock of a storage room door, stealing a set of tools including a flashlight drill, grinder, and electric hammer belonging to the victim Han. As they passed under Building No. 3 of the same complex, they also stole a Yadea brand electric scooter from the victim Fu that was parked there. Later, the three arrived in an alley to the south of the city's emergency center and stole another Yadea brand electric scooter parked at the doorway of the victim Liu's home. According to the appraisal by the price evaluation department, the total value of the stolen items was 3,090 yuan. Around 1 PM on June 5, 2015, defendants Du and Qin were arrested by police officers in a village of a certain town in the city, and the stolen property was seized by the police and returned to the victims. The facts ascertained during the investigation were largely consistent with the charges. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Du and Qin during the court hearing and were confirmed by the statements of the victims Han, Liu, and Fu, as well as by the recognition records, price appraisal conclusion of the involved items, seizure list, return list, household registration certificate, criminal judgment, arrest records, and procedural statements, which were sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in August 2017, defendants Hu and Zheng provided the household registration book of the victim Hu's wife, Yang, at a district's household registration center, and falsely claimed that Zheng was Yang. They obtained an ID card with Zheng's photo and Yang's information. In August 2018, Hu and Zheng used the above ID card at a district's disabled persons' federation to obtain a disability certificate with Zheng's photo and Yang's information for Zheng. Subsequently, Hu instructed Zheng to apply for a Construction Bank card. In April 2019, Zheng reported the loss of the victim Yang's former Construction Bank card at a branch on Wulanmulun Street of China Construction Bank, and used the above ID card to apply for a new Construction Bank card under Yang's name. The balance from the original Yang's Construction Bank card was automatically transferred to the new Yang's Construction Bank card obtained by Zheng. On October 26, 2019, Zheng withdrew 100 yuan from the Yang's Construction Bank card he obtained. Hu also instructed Zheng to use Yang's name for activities in a certain location, and during the epidemic period from February to March 2020, Zheng used Yang's name to enter and exit a residential community. Defendants Hu and Zheng were brought to justice after being summoned by the police by phone. According to these facts,", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district charges that the debtor, Liao, resides in a certain district. Due to being unable to repay multiple debts, Liao dared not live in the residence, which was occupied by his mother, the victim Xia. Defendants Xie, Liu, Long, Xu, Lin, Pang, Teng, and Cai forcibly entered the residence to demand repayment from Liao and refused to leave, seriously affecting Xia's normal life and residential tranquility.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Long": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"], "Pang": ["Imprisonment"], "Teng": ["Imprisonment"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province charged: Apple Inc. (English name: APPLE INC.) registered the trademarks \"iphone\", \"APPLE\", and \"IPHONE\" with numbers 5621463, 6281188, 6151368, approved for use on goods in categories 9 and 16 such as computers, telephones, and earphones; the validity periods are from April 14, 2010, to April 13, 2020, from September 7, 2010, to September 6, 2020, and from February 7, 2010, to February 6, 2020, respectively. Starting in October 2014, the defendants Zhang and Wu were employed by Qiu (handled in a separate case) as accomplices, using a house on Tianhe Road in a certain district of this city as their base, to produce and sell counterfeit Apple mobile phones without authorization, in order to gain illegal profits. Zhang and Wu were responsible for refurbishing, packaging, processing, labeling, and delivering the goods. On May 26, 2015, the police apprehended the defendants Zhang and Wu at the location, and seized on site 47 Apple 4S phones, 46 Apple 5 phones, 7 Apple 5S phones, and a batch of accessories (after appraisal, they were all found to be goods with counterfeit registered trademarks; after evaluation, their total value was 91,770 RMB). Additionally, the police seized a batch of sales documents at the location, and after auditing, it was found that a total of 1,335 counterfeit Apple phones had been sold, with a total sales amount of 1,750,312 RMB.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on March 30, 2011, the defendant Wang, unable to obtain a loan from the credit union in Xiping Township, Weishan County, sought help from his friend Wei to use Wei's identity to apply for a loan. Wei agreed and assisted Wang, applying for a loan of 200,000 yuan from the Xiping Township Credit Union under the pretense of purchasing steel materials, with a loan period of two years. The funds were used by Wang. After the loan expired on March 29, 2013, the Xiping Credit Union made multiple demands for repayment, which remained unpaid. After the case was discovered, Wei voluntarily repaid the loan of 200,000 yuan to the Xiping Credit Union on August 6, 2014. The defendants raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, which were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Tang, and others, as well as the loan contract, case explanation, repayment proof, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that the defendant Ding, in collusion with the defendant Gai, entered the construction site of Longyuan Construction on Airport Road in Luzhi Town, a certain district of a certain city, by climbing over the wall in the early morning of February 28, 2015, and stole 687 iron fasteners belonging to Longyuan Construction Group Co., Ltd., valued at 2,267 RMB. After their arrest, defendants Ding and Gai both truthfully confessed to the above facts. Following the resolution of the case, the public security authorities recovered all the stolen goods and have returned them to the victimized unit. The public security authorities seized part of the proceeds from the sale of the stolen iron fasteners, amounting to 540 RMB, from the defendant Gai. During the court proceedings, defendants Ding and Gai raised no objections to the above facts. The facts are corroborated by the statement records of Ke, an employee of the victimized unit, the testimony records of witnesses Wu and Fan, identification records, on-site identification records, site photographs, photos of the stolen goods, lists of seizures and returns, case-solving reports, arrest reports, criminal judgment documents, administrative penalty decision documents, release certificates, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Gai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Longgang District in a certain city charges: 1. On October 5, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Lu and Wang, together with Huang, Li, Wu (all prosecuted in separate cases), and \"Xiao Wu\" (handled in a separate case), assaulted and threatened the victim Li at the riverside located 30 meters south of Baoda Technology Factory in a certain village of a certain district in a certain city, robbing him of 1,000 yuan in cash; 2. On October 7, 2013, at around 9:00 PM, the defendants Lu and Wang, together with Huang, Li, Wu, and \"Xiao Wu,\" forcibly dragged the victim Huang A to the riverside on the pedestrian path north of the Sha Lake Second Bridge in the Shahu Community of a certain district in a certain city, assaulted him, and robbed him of over 100 yuan in cash and a mobile phone (appraised at a value of 272 yuan).", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court found that in April 2013, the defendants Wu and Zhang conspired to arrange a gambling session. They agreed that Wu would be responsible for arranging the venue, while Zhang would bring people to gamble. On April 15, defendant Wu organized for Chen (already convicted) and others to go to Room 315 of the Yizhou International Hotel in Pingyi for gambling, and instructed Xu (already convicted) to be present to lend money at high interest rates. At noon that day, Zhang falsely claimed to repay a loan to Meng, deceiving him to come out, while defendant Wu arranged for Zhang to bring Zhang and others to the casino. Later, defendant Zhang, in collusion with another Zhang, deceived Meng into participating in gambling, during which Meng lost about 210,000 yuan. It was also found that after the 2013 Spring Festival, defendant Zhang frequently followed defendant Wu to casinos to gamble, responsible for driving, managing accounts, and other tasks. After being apprehended, both defendants confessed truthfully to their criminal activities. The above facts are corroborated by witness testimonies from Meng and Zhang, among others, evidences from the Pingyi County Public Security Bureau, including records of arrest and household registration certificates, as well as the confessions of the defendants during the investigation phase. The defendants raised no objections during the trial, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charges that on the evening of May 24, 2015, at around 21:00, defendants He, Fan, and Zhou drove a car with the license plate number Su F××××× to a location near the outer wall of the potted plant area on the southeast side of the east gate of the Langshan Scenic Area in Chongchuan District of this city. He and Fan entered the potted plant area of the Langshan Scenic Area by means of climbing over the wall using a ladder, with Zhou assisting from outside the wall. That night, defendants He, Fan, and Zhou stole one juniper bonsai, one medium-leaf Luohan pine bonsai, and one boxwood bonsai from the potted plant area of Langshan Scenic Area. According to the appraisal, the bonsai involved in the case were valued at a total of 17,000 RMB. After the incident, the stolen bonsai were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. On June 3, 2015, defendants Fan and Zhou were apprehended and brought to justice, and defendant He turned himself in to the public security authorities on the same day. After arriving at the case, defendants He, Fan, and Zhou truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants He, Fan, and Zhou during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including the statements made by defendants He, Fan, and Zhou during the investigation phase presented by the public prosecutor, the victim Gu’s statement, search transcripts from the public security authorities, seizure decisions, seizure lists, list of returned items, evidence retrieval lists, on-site inspection records from the public security agency, surveillance video screenshots, the appraisal opinion report from the Nantong Price Certification Center, the optical disc production description issued by the public security agency, the case process, and the household registration information of defendants He, Fan, and Zhou. These evidences have all been verified and confirmed during the trial and are acknowledged by this court.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At around 11:30 am on January 6, 2015, the defendants Wu, Xu, and Liu got into a dispute with Wang Mouyi over a parking issue in front of the Xiaowu Ceramics Shop operated by defendant Wu in a village of a certain town in Shengzhou City, which escalated into a physical altercation. During the incident, defendants Wu, Xu, and Liu used fists, kicks, and a bench to cause injuries to Wang Mouyi. According to the Shengzhou City Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, Wang Mouyi suffered a ruptured spleen and underwent a \"splenectomy for spleen rupture,\" with the overall injuries reaching the level of second-degree serious injury. On the same afternoon, defendant Wu turned himself in at the Huangze Police Station of the Shengzhou City Public Security Bureau, but did not truthfully confess the main criminal facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain county's People's Procuratorate charges: In July 2015, the defendants Cai, Ye, and Wang, along with \"Old X\" (all handled in separate cases) conspired in advance. Defendants Cai, Wang, and \"Old X\" were responsible for funding, purchasing production equipment, and liaising with electroplating clients, while defendant Ye provided the venue. The four partners set up an electroplating processing point at a certain bay on the edge of a mountain in a village in a town within a certain county. Around July 28, 2015, defendant Yang was hired at this processing point to use chemicals such as sulfuric acid and nitric acid to process waste electrical appliances and scrap iron blocks. During production, wastewater was discharged directly into the soil pit next to the processing point without any treatment, later seeping into the soil and flowing into the creek. On August 13, 2015, the county's Environmental Protection Bureau inspected the processing point and sampled the discharged water for testing. The tests revealed that the copper content at the pit's inlet and outlet were 8.3mg/L and 8.9mg/L, respectively, exceeding the limits specified by the National Electroplating Pollutant Discharge Standards by more than three times. On October 26, 2015, defendant Ye voluntarily surrendered to the county's Public Security Bureau; on November 11, 2015, defendant Cai also voluntarily surrendered to the county's Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial. This is substantiated by the confession of co-defendant Ye, testimonies from witnesses Shi, Chen, and Xie, situation explanations, seizure decision documents, relevant photos, sampling evidence notifications, electroplating pollutant discharge standards, call records, test reports and acceptance opinions, on-site inspection records and diagrams, identification records, case process, household registration information, and other evidence, sufficient to recognize these facts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at noon on May 22, 2016, Huang B (handled in a separate case) was advised by the urban management auxiliary officer not to sell goods irregularly at the entrance of Guangfu Market on Anfu Street, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City. At around 12 noon, Huang B gathered defendants Ke, Zhao, and Li A, Huang A, Su, and Huang (all handled in separate cases) across from Zhuhai Ninth Middle School on Anfu Street, where they assaulted urban management officers Zhang1, Cheng, Zhang2, Li2, and Peng with watermelon knives, bricks, etc., injuring them. According to the identification, injuries sustained by victims Zhang1 and Cheng were classified as minor injuries level two; injuries sustained by victims Zhang2 and Li2 were classified as slight injuries; injuries sustained by victim Peng did not reach the level of slight injuries. During the fight, defendant Ke attacked people with a knife, while defendant Zhao held the victim to assist Ke and others in injuring people. Defendant Ke was apprehended on May 22, 2016, and defendant Zhao was apprehended on May 25, 2016. It was also found that the families of defendants Ke and Zhao compensated victims Zhang1, Zhang2, and Cheng for their losses, for which the three victims expressed forgiveness and requested leniency from the People's Court for the two defendants. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Ke and Zhao during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimonies and identification records of victims Zhang1, Cheng, Zhang2, Li2, and Peng, as well as the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Huang, Chen, Wang, Hu, Zhou, and Li1. Additional evidence includes the list of accepted evidence materials, on-site investigation records, trace and physical evidence registration forms, a site orientation diagram of the case, situation explanations, the wanted persons list, identified surveillance video screenshots, on-site photos, preliminary forensic examination opinions, forensic assessment reports of human body injuries, notices of assessment opinions, etc. The defense counsel argued that defendant Zhao compensated victims Zhang1, Zhang2, and Cheng for their losses and obtained the forgiveness of the three victims, requesting the People's Court to impose a lighter penalty on defendant Zhao.", "label": {"Ke": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In early 2009, the defendants Ceng and Mao, under the cover of \"Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.\", took on a curtain wall project in a certain place of a certain state. In the second half of 2009, when the defendants Ceng and Mao were negotiating a material supply business with Shanghai Qimai Curtain Wall Materials Co., Ltd., they conspired, and Ceng illegally commissioned another person to create a seal of \"Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.\" through an advertisement for the price of 120 yuan. With the use of this forged seal, they successfully signed a contract. In 2011, due to arrears in payment, Shanghai Qimai Curtain Wall Materials Co., Ltd. sued Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd. in court, which led to the discovery of the case. According to the Jinhua City Public Security Judicial Expertise Center, the submitted imprint content of the red rubber stamp of \"Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.\" differs from the official seal of \"Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.\". After the incident, Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd. paid the material cost of RMB 313,138 to Shanghai Qimai Curtain Wall Materials Co., Ltd. from the received project payments. The aforementioned facts were confessed by the defendants Ceng and Mao, and are supported by the household registration certificates and confession records of Ceng and Mao; the case investigation process; the statement of the victim, Fang; the testimony of the witness, Chen; the list of evidence materials received by the Jinhua Public Security Bureau branch in a certain area and the seal of Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.; the document examination and appraisal report No. (2014) 123 from the Jinhua City Public Security Judicial Expertise Center; China Agricultural Bank vouchers; payment details from the cultural center of a certain location; a copy of the business license of Jinhua Wujing Construction and Decoration Co., Ltd.; the internal assessment responsibility system; the contract; and the civil mediation document No. (2011) 123 from this court. These pieces of evidence are legal, valid, and mutually corroborative, and this court hereby confirms them according to the law.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Detention"], "Mao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuxi City charged: Since March 2014, the defendants Cui and Guo, together with Li C and Zhang (both already sentenced), provided loans at gambling sessions organized by others. On the morning of April 22, because gambler Li A failed to repay a loan of 3,000 yuan after the gambling session, defendant Guo, along with Zhang, accompanied Li A by car to withdraw money. Li A led Guo and Zhang to the Qingmingqiao Police Station in a certain district of this city and filed a report. The Qingmingqiao Police Station transferred the case to the Liyuan Police Station in the same district for processing. After receiving a phone notification, defendant Cui, along with Li C and Li B (already sentenced), went to the entrance of the Liyuan Police Station to wait. Later, Li A left the police station in another person's van. Seeing this, Zhang and Li B drove a car to intercept the van at a nearby intersection and forcibly pulled Li A into the back seat of the car. Later, defendants Cui, Guo, and Li C met Zhang and Li B at the southern section of an elevated road in the city. Li C and Zhang slapped Li A several times in the car. Around 11 a.m. that day, defendants Cui, Guo, and Li C, along with Zhang and Li B, took Li A to the woods near the south side of Cuiyuan Bridge on Qingyuan Road, Huazhuang Street, in a certain district of the city, where they beat Li A and forced him to repay the money, and made him strip to his underwear. Afterwards, defendants ", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3 PM on November 3, 2015, the defendants Ye and Wu, were at the parking lot of Minsheng Bank Tower on Xinhua Road, Jianghan District in this city. Defendant Wu acted as a lookout while defendant Ye used a homemade key to unlock the vehicle and steal an Emma TDT328Z electric bicycle belonging to the victim Zhang, which was valued at 2200 RMB. Ye and Wu were apprehended at the entrance of a quiet residential area on Huangshi Road, in a certain district of a city. The stolen electric bicycle has been recovered and returned to the victim. After being brought to justice, defendant Ye voluntarily confessed to the following criminal acts: On September 15, 2015, at around 4 PM, at the entrance of Zhongbai Warehouse on Youyi Road, in Jianghan District of a city, defendant Ye used a homemade key to unlock the vehicle and stole a Qilei TDR48Z electric bicycle, valued at 1750 RMB, owned by the victim Tu. The stolen goods were lost. On October 21, 2015, at around 3 PM, at the entrance of Dali Textile on Jiangfa Road in Jianghan District of a city, defendant Ye used a homemade key to unlock the vehicle and stole a Qilei TDR148Z electric bicycle, valued at 2430 RMB, owned by the victim Yi. The stolen goods were lost. In summary, defendant Ye committed theft three times, with stolen properties valued at a total of 6380 RMB, while defendant Wu committed theft once, with stolen property valued at 2200 RMB. During the trial, defendants Ye and Wu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are supported by photo evidence, the police reports of arrest and case resolution, household registration materials, seizure records, seizure lists, return lists, inspection records, criminal judgments, testimonies from witnesses Liu and Pan, statements from victims Zhang, Tu, and Yi, and a price appraisal report, all sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the night of April 20, 2014, defendants Li, Ling, Wang, Hu, Ming, and others were at Good Voice KTV Entertainment on the 7th floor of Zhiccheng, Shushan District, Hefei City. Around 23:30, Li, Ling, and Wang escorted friends to the elevator on the 7th floor to leave. Because Li was holding his hand at the elevator door, the victims Tang and Jiang and others were unable to take the same elevator to leave. After the elevator left, Tang and others prepared to take another elevator to leave. Li believed Tang glared at him, thus provoking an incident. Li, Ling, and Wang followed Tang, Jiang, and others into the elevator, preventing them from leaving, and began pulling and hitting Tang in the elevator while Tang and his friends repeatedly backed off. During this time, Ling ran back to the Good Voice KTV room to call other friends out. Subsequently, Ling, Hu, and Ming came out from the room in succession and, seeing Li and Wang hitting Tang in the 7th-floor corridor, also came forward to hit Tang. Jiang, who was trying to dissuade them, was also beaten by Li and the others. Later, Li, Ling, Wang, Hu, and Ming left the scene. On July 29, 2014, defendants Li, Ling, Wang, and Hu voluntarily surrendered to the police; on August 4 of the same year, defendant Ming voluntarily surrendered to the police. As appraised, the injuries of the victims Tang and Jiang were classified as minor injuries. It was further found that, given that after the incident, defendants Li, Ling, Wang, Hu, and Ming compensated the two victims with 30,000 yuan each, on July 31, 2014, Tang and Jiang issued a letter of understanding expressing forgiveness for the actions of the five defendants. After the incident, defendants Li, Ling, Wang, Hu, and Ming truthfully confessed to the facts of the aforementioned case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Ling, Wang, Hu, and Ming during the court trial and were confirmed by evidence such as statements from victims Tang and Jiang, identification records, audio-visual materials, site sketches and photos, injury appraisal opinions, household registration certificates, the process of surrendering, letters of understanding, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Ling": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Detention"], "Ming": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On April 21, 2019, at approximately 19:00, in a certain district of a certain city, at the north side of the west end of a small east-west road, at a \"Deep Water Danger\" warning sign, the defendant Wang sold 0.5 grams of methamphetamine to the defendant Bao for 597 yuan. 2. On January 27, 2019, opposite a certain gas station in the capital of the city, at an iron pillar at the south end of a north-south road, Wang 1 (already sentenced) sold 0.8 grams of methamphetamine for 1,200 yuan through the defendant Wang to the defendant Bao. 3. On January 31, 2019, Wang 1 (already sentenced) sold 0.8 grams of methamphetamine for 1,200 yuan at the same location and in the same manner through the defendant Wang to the defendant Bao. 4. On April 22, 2019, the defendant Bao transferred 3,000 yuan for drugs to the defendant Wang to purchase drugs, and Wang 1 (already sentenced) sold 1.8 grams of methamphetamine through the defendant Wang to the defendant Bao on Unicom Road near a village near a certain academy in a certain district of a certain city. 5. On the afternoon of April 15, 2019, the defendant Bao allowed Ma to use drugs once in his gray Roewe car near \"a certain place\" at the north end of a certain district. 6. On the evenings of April 15 and April 22, 2019, the defendant Bao allowed Ma to use drugs twice in his home at a certain number in a certain district. Upon trial, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city are true. It was also found that this case was discovered by the public security organs during their work. The defendant Wang was arrested and brought to justice by the public security organs, and the defendant Bao was escorted back from the Zichuan District Administrative Detention Center. Both defendants Wang and Bao truthfully confessed their criminal facts. During the court hearings, neither defendant Wang nor Bao raised any objections to the above facts, and the facts are sufficiently confirmed by documentary evidence such as the statement explaining the case, witness testimonies, identification records, and the defendants' confessions.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Between March and May 2016, the defendant Tan, in collusion with Yuan (handled in a separate case), provided a place for the defendant Li to use the drug methamphetamine (crystal meth) on four occasions in the south-facing room on the fifth floor of the \"Chain Hotel\" on Fengshan Street in this city. During the same period, the defendant Li provided a place for the defendant Tan and Yuan to use the drug methamphetamine on four occasions in the north-facing room on the fifth floor of the same hotel where he rented. On May 14, 2016, the defendant Li was arrested by municipal public security officers on suspicion of drug use and subsequently confessed to the aforementioned actions; on the same day, the defendant Tan was also arrested by municipal public security officers. Methamphetamine reagent tests showed that the urine test results of the defendant Li, the defendant Tan, and the drug user Yuan were all positive. These facts were not disputed by the defendant Li and the defendant Tan during the trial and are supported by documentary evidence, photographs, administrative penalty decision documents, receipts, the \"arrest process,\" population information, testimonies of witnesses Yuan and Wang, identification records and photograph explanations, on-site test reports, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: At around 2 a.m. on September 7, 2015, defendants Fan and Li, after planning, broke into Room 101 in the residential area of the old Forestry Bureau in Hecheng District, Huaihua City. Using a lock-picking technique by defendant Fan to enter the premises, they stole over 3,000 yuan in cash from the interior belonging to victim Zhu. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Fan and Li during the court trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as documentary evidence of the arrest process, criminal judgment, criminal decision, certificate of release after serving the sentence, household registration proof, situation explanation, victim Zhu's statement, on-site inspection records, schematics and photographs, recognition records and photos, identification records and photos, surveillance video screenshots, and the confessions of defendants Fan and Li, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that: Between May and July 2015, the defendants Lu and Du committed theft three times at the collective dormitories of the Yadong Zitan construction site and another construction site in a certain district of a certain city, stealing a total of 6,100 RMB. The prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Lu and Du constitute the crime of x, and suggests that this court punish defendants Lu and Du in accordance with the provisions of Articles x, x, and x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Lu and Du did not dispute the facts in the indictment and made no defense in court.\n\nThis court, upon trial, found that between May and July 2015, defendants Lu and Du committed theft three times at the collective dormitories of the Yadong Zitan construction site and another construction site in a certain district, stealing a total of 6,100 RMB. The specific criminal facts are as follows: \n\n1", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: In December 2015, on the recommendation and guarantee of the victim Yang, the defendant Zhang lent 30,000 yuan to Li. When the loan matured, Li failed to repay as agreed. On February 13, 2016, at approximately 20:00, defendant Zhang invited defendant Zhou and others to deceive Yang into coming out, forcibly took him to an alley near the 41 Factory in Shiyan City, and forced him to repay the money through threats. They later took him to a room in the Wuyan Shenzhouxing Hotel for detention. During this time, defendant Zhou assaulted and threatened Yang. Until February 18, around 20:00, the police rescued Yang. After the incident, victim Yang issued a letter of understanding, expressing forgiveness for defendant Zhang’s actions and requesting leniency in punishment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou, Zhang, and their defender Wang during the court hearing, and were confirmed by documentary evidence such as household registration proof, details of the arrest, the checkout bill from Shenzhouxing Hotel, the letter of understanding, and testimonies from witnesses Liu, Li, and others, as well as the victim Zhou's statements, which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: On March 26, 2016, at approximately 11:00, the defendant Zhou, in collaboration with Sheng, was involved in an incident near the bicycle shed beside the Hydraulic Engineering Building at China University of Geosciences in Hongshan District of a certain city. Zhou acted as the lookout while Sheng used tools such as pliers provided by Zhou to steal a \"Giant\" model 777 mountain bike belonging to the victim Xu, parked at that location. The bike was appraised at a value of 1250 RMB. At approximately 12:00 on the same day, defendant Zhou used tools he carried to steal a \"Merida\" Duke 600 mountain bike belonging to the victim Chen, parked inside the south-side yard near the west gate of the university. This bike was appraised at a value of 1100 RMB. Defendants Zhou and Sheng were later apprehended and brought to justice.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 4 a.m. on July 23, 2014, the defendants Xia and Wei went to the entrance of the Rongtai Hotel on Changjiang East Road, Yaohai District, in a certain city, where they stole a gray-white Jinan Qingqi brand motorcycle (valued at 3,800 RMB according to appraisal) belonging to the victim, Fei, which was parked at the entrance of the Rongtai Hotel. Subsequently, defendant Wei sold the motorcycle to another person for 900 RMB, of which defendant Xia received 400 RMB. On August 14, 2014, defendants Xia and Wei were apprehended by the police and brought to justice. After being taken into custody, defendant Wei recovered the stolen vehicle and returned it to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xia and Wei during the court hearing, and they are substantiated by evidence including a price appraisal report, identification records, audio-visual materials, lists of seized and returned items, identification records and site photos, a vehicle purchase receipt, hotel check-in receipts, details of the apprehension, household registration certificates, testimony from witnesses Zhao, Guan, and Yang, and the victim Fei's report of the incident.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the evening of December 31, 2013, Lei A suspected that his wife Chen A was having an improper relationship with Zhang, the workshop director of Qunxi Door Industry in Yongkang City. This led to a quarrel and physical fight between Lei A and Chen A in their rented house in a certain village of a certain town. When Lei's brother, defendant Lei, learned the reason for their quarrel, he went to Qunxi Door Industry to find Zhang and brought him to Lei A's rented house for questioning. As Lei A and his wife were still fighting, defendant Lei, angered at Zhang, proceeded to hold Zhang down on a bed and assault him by punching and kicking. During this time, Chen A's second brother, defendant Chen, also stepped in to help hold and beat Zhang. Later, defendants Lei and Chen took Zhang to a nearby basketball court and then to the Qunxi Door Industry premises to continue the assault, resulting in Zhang sustaining fractures to his right 3rd, 5th, 6th, 9th, and 10th ribs and transverse process fractures to the right side of his lumbar vertebrae 1, 2, and 3. According to the forensic assessment, Zhang's injuries were classified as minor injuries. The civil aspect of the case has been settled through mediation with the victim's understanding obtained. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lei and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of defendants Lei and Chen, the victim Zhang, and witnesses Chen A, Hu, Wang, Yang, and Luo. Additional evidence includes the seizure list, physical evidence photos, medical records, examination reports, ID proof, case reports, forensic assessments on the degree of human injury, scene investigation records, photos, identification records, hospitalization records, outpatient medical records, the mediation agreement, and a letter of understanding, all of which are sufficient for the case's establishment.", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that between January 2018 and May 2019, the defendant Luo, while interacting with the defendant Wang (who was then the warehouse manager at Jiangxi Senyang Technology Co., Ltd.), conspired with Wang to have Wang exploit his position to steal neodymium iron boron permanent magnet materials from the company warehouse and sell them to Luo for processing and profit. According to the appraisal by the Xinfeng County Price Certification Center, the involved neodymium iron boron permanent magnet materials were valued at 298,475 yuan. After the incident, Wang returned 223,457 yuan and Luo returned 60,000 yuan of the illicit gains. The neodymium iron boron permanent magnet materials seized from the two defendants (valued at 26,799.43 yuan) were also returned to the company. Thus, both defendants have fully returned the illicit gains. Wang received the victim unit's understanding. On August 9, 2019, Wang was summoned and brought to justice, and on October 14, Luo voluntarily surrendered to the Xinfeng County Public Security Bureau. Both defendants voluntarily signed a confession and punishment agreement in the presence of a duty lawyer, expressing their admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment. On July 20, 2020, after investigation and evaluation, the Xinfeng County Bureau of Justice agreed to implement community correction for Wang. On July 18, 2020, the Taihe County Bureau of Justice also agreed to implement community correction for Luo after investigation and evaluation. The two defendants had no objections during the court hearing, and the case was substantiated by evidence, including the confessions of both defendants, the testimony of witness Xu, the price certification conclusion, WeChat transaction records, transaction lists, seizure decision and list, return list, item inspection list, materials related to the return of illegal proceeds, the letter of understanding, criminal record inquiry, case process records, and population information sheets, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that from March 2017 to the time the case was discovered, defendants Guo, Hao, Guo1, and Shi, as part of an evil force gang, intercepted passing trucks and required each truck to pay passing fees of 100 yuan, 80 yuan, 70 yuan, etc., to villagers of a certain village and villagers of Gongyi Village. They organized villagers from a certain village and Gongyi Village to set up roadblocks on the roads of a certain village to intercept passing trucks. They unlawfully demanded passing fees ranging from 350 yuan to 450 yuan from truck drivers by threatening not to let them pass if the fees were not paid. Defendants Hao, Guo1, and Shi handed over the collected passing fees to Defendant Guo, with Hao, Guo1, and Shi taking a small commission, and Guo then allocated part of the criminal income to the villagers of a certain village and Gongyi Village, while keeping the remainder for himself. The gang of defendants Guo, Hao, Guo1, and Shi obtained a total illegal criminal income of 630,100 yuan. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution provided the following evidence: the household registration and criminal record certificates of defendants Guo, Hao, Guo1, and Shi issued by Guyang County Public Security Bureau; the record of the arrest of defendants Guo, Hao, Guo1, and Shi issued by Guyang County Public Security Bureau; the criminal judgment of defendants Guo, Hao; the seizure decision and explanation issued by Guyang County Public Security Bureau; the WeChat transaction records of Defendant Hao; the records of vehicle interception fees from a certain village; Wang A’s case initiation decision; testimonies from witnesses Zhao1, Shi1, etc.; statements from victims Tang1, Wang1, Shi2, etc.; confessions and defenses from defendants Guo, Guo1, Shi, Hao; extraction records and identification records issued by Guyang County Public Security Bureau, and other evidence.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: On the evening of February 13, 2014, at around 20:00, the defendant Meng entered the courtyard of Song's house in the city by climbing over the wall and stole a Yifeng brand J11 pneumatic pickaxe valued at 240 RMB, belonging to the victim Song. The stolen pneumatic pickaxe was later hidden in the rental house of the defendant He. At around 22:00 the same evening, the defendant Meng, along with the defendant He, used the same method to enter the victim Song's courtyard again and stole four Yifeng brand J11 pneumatic pickaxes, with a total value of 960 RMB. The stolen pneumatic pickaxes were later hidden in the rental house of the defendant He. Early the next morning, the defendant Meng, along with the defendant He, used the same method to enter the victim Song's courtyard again and stole three Yifeng brand J11 pneumatic pickaxes, worth a total of 720 RMB. The stolen pneumatic pickaxes were later hidden in the roadside bushes. Subsequently, when the defendants Meng and He tried to enter the victim Song's house by prying open burglar-proof doors and windows to continue stealing, they fled the scene after being discovered by the public. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim Song.", "label": {"Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: From April to July 2013, the defendant Zhong used a rented residence to organize others to engage in \"Kawuxing\" gambling activities, during which time, they collected a total of more than 40,000 yuan in profits from gambling. On September 2, 2013, the defendant Zhong voluntarily went to the public security authorities, truthfully confessed his criminal acts, and returned the illicit gains of 40,000 yuan to the public security authorities. From March to April 2014, the defendant Zhong once again organized others to engage in \"Kawuxing\" gambling activities at his home and hired the defendant Li to collect gambling profits at the casino, during which they provided gambling funds to the participants and charged high interest. On April 25, 2014, the public security authority arrested both defendants and seized the gambling funds and illegal profits of defendant Li and the gambling participants at the scene.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at 16:00 on March 11, 2013, the defendant Kang was driving a motorcycle with the defendant Xue from east to west when they lost balance and fell on the east side of a small bridge road north of a certain village in a certain town of a certain county due to uneven road surfaces. The victim, Lu, was traveling by motorcycle from west to east and was blocked at this location. Kang and Xue, without any reason, assaulted Lu. According to the forensic examination by the Criminal Science and Technology Department of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, the blunt force caused a fracture in the lower segment of Lu's left fibula, and the injury was classified as minor. After the incident, the parties involved reached a civil settlement agreement, which has been fulfilled. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the victim Lu's statement, testimonies from witnesses Zhao and Liu, the forensic examination report by the Criminal Science and Technology Department of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, the civil settlement agreement, and the letter of understanding, among other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Kang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that between February 2018 and September 2019, the defendant Hou was employed by the Liangshan County Animal Husbandry Bureau as an assistant animal quarantine officer, responsible for the quarantine of pigs in the jurisdiction. During the pig quarantine process, defendant Hou took advantage of his position to accept a total of 289,417 RMB via WeChat transfers and other methods from defendant Meng and pig dealers Zhang1, Zhuang1, Ji, Zhang2, Zhang6, and Tang. In exchange, Hou provided these individuals with convenience during the pig quarantine process. Specifically, defendant Meng, after purchasing pigs in areas around a certain county, gave 112,140 RMB to defendant Hou in order to obtain the \"Animal Quarantine Certificate\" issued by the Liangshan County Animal Husbandry Bureau. In support of the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: animal quarantine certificates and other documents; 2. Witness testimony: testimonies of witnesses Zhang1, Zhuang1, and others; 3. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of defendants Hou and Meng; 4. Electronic data: a CD of WeChat transaction details.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Meng": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on September 7, 2015, at around 12:00, defendants Zhu and Wang conspired to steal two surveillance cameras already installed with mounts (worth 1,884.8 yuan) in the basement of Building No. 5 at a construction site in a certain district of a city where they worked. At around 17:00 on the same day, the two defendants stole two more already installed surveillance cameras (worth 1,848.7 yuan) at the same location. The two defendants later divided the stolen goods evenly and hid them in their respective temporary residences. The following day, defendants Zhu and Wang were apprehended at the construction site, and the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Wang during the court proceedings. There is also testimony from witness Wang, photographs of the stolen goods, a seizure order, a seizure list, a return list, extraction records and photos, Price Appraisal Conclusion No. 10428 (2015) from a local appraisal agency, apprehension process documentation, an investigation report, and the defendants' household registration certificates as evidence, which are sufficient for affirmation.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that around 19:40 on December 4, 2015, defendants Lu and Li committed theft of a gold Apple 6S phone from the right pocket of Lin’s clothing at the entrance of the Century Huamao Supermarket in Bantian Street, a certain district of a certain city. The next day, Lu sold the phone for 2,600 yuan, and he and Li split the proceeds. On the morning of December 5, 2015, around 8:30, Lu and Li stole a white Dowe phone from the right pocket of a woman's jacket in an industrial area in a certain district of the same city. On December 12, 2015, around 23:00, the police arrested Lu and Li in Room 502, No. 4, Alley 5, Houshanxi, Xue Village, Bantian Street, the same district, and seized 800 yuan in stolen money and a white Dowe phone at the scene. According to the appraisal, the stolen Apple phone from Lin was valued at 5,084 yuan. The white Dowe phone couldn't be turned on, and its specific model and configuration couldn't be determined, so a price appraisal conclusion based on existing information couldn't be issued. The aforementioned facts have not been contested by defendants Lu and Li during the court trial, and are substantiated by material evidence such as 800 yuan and one phone, documentary evidence like the arrest process and identity information, witness Peng's testimony, victim Lin's statement, defendants Lu and Li's confessions, the appraisal opinion on the value of the involved property, on-site inspection records and photos, recognition records, and other evidence, sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that at around midnight on March 25, 2013, in the first-floor restaurant of the city's \"Wawa Jiao\" dry pot establishment, the defendants Xu and Wang, after drinking, unreasonably assaulted customers Xia, Gou A, and Zhu with dining utensils, causing head injuries to Xia and Gou A. According to the assessment, the head injuries sustained by both individuals were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Xu and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the authorities and truthfully confessed their crime. They compensated the victims Xia and Gou A with 4,000 yuan for medical expenses. Later, during the trial, under the mediation of this court, both parties reached a compensation agreement. The two defendants compensated the two victims with a total of 10,000 yuan for their losses, fully complied with the agreement, and received the understanding of the victims Xia and Gou A. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Xia and Gou B; the testimonies of witnesses Qi and Zhou; documentary evidence including the residential registration form, incident description, receipt, and the public security administrative penalty decision issued by the municipal Public Security Bureau; and the forensic medical assessment opinions numbered (2013)383 and 384, issued by the Forensic Evidence Identification Office of the municipal Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and verification, it was found that on March 18, 2014, at around 5 p.m., Dai (already sentenced), along with the defendants Chen and Liu, and Zhang (already sentenced), in order to collect a debt, hired a van with the license plate Zhe B×××××, driven by Wang, to a rice field in a village in a certain town of a city district. There, they forcibly took Ding, using punches, kicks, and by pulling and dragging him into the van. They then forcibly drove him to a hillside in a certain town of the district, where they intimidated him using punches, a belt, and a wooden stick, to coerce him into signing and fingerprinting a promissory note prepared in advance by Dai. At around 7 p.m. that day, defendants Chen, Liu, and others left Ding by the roadside in a certain town of the district. The injuries suffered by the victim, Ding, amounted to minor injuries. On July 17, 2014, defendant Liu was apprehended by police officers on a road in a certain village of a city district. On the 25th at around 3 p.m. of the same month, defendant Chen voluntarily turned himself in at the Jishigang police station and truthfully confessed his criminal behavior. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liu and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by statements from the victim Ding, confessions from convicted accomplices Dai and Zhang, testimonies from witnesses Ding Jia, Wang, Zhou, and Jin, identification records, the promissory note, medical records, the forensic examination opinion on human injury from the police forensic center of a city district, arrest records, case files, criminal judgment No. 1017 (2014) from this court, an administrative penalty decision from a sub-bureau of a city's police department, and identity documents of the two defendants, which jointly confirm the findings.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on February 17, 2014, Zhao contacted the defendant Wei by phone to purchase drugs. Around 3 a.m. that day, under the arrangement of defendant Wei, defendant Wang sold 1.3 grams of methamphetamine to Zhao in the lobby of the Xi Bai Nian Hotel located in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain city for 500 yuan when they were caught by police officers on the spot. The 1.3 grams of methamphetamine were immediately confiscated, and an additional 1.3 grams of methamphetamine were found on defendant Wang. Later, 3.2 grams of methamphetamine were found in Room 8302 rented by defendant Wang at the Sheng You He Tai Hotel on Qianling West Road, Yunyan District of a certain city. There is no dispute regarding these facts from defendants Wang and Wei during the court hearing, and the facts are corroborated by household registration certificates and confessions, witness testimony from Zhao, seizure warrants and lists of seized items, drug test reports, records of seizure and identification of suspected drugs, physical evidence (photos), explanations, arrest records, call records, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A city's People's Procuratorate charged that from the end of 2011 to early November 2015, defendants Wang and Hong allowed others to gamble in the form of \"Niu Niu\" at their convenience store located opposite No. × Fuchi Road, Xincheng Street, in a certain city, and took cuts from gambling winnings. Starting on December 25, 2015, defendants Wang and Hong organized gambling in the form of \"San Gong Compare Size\" at different locations including their convenience store, in a fast-food restaurant owned by Zeng, who is dealt with in a separate case, and in the front room of Floor × of a building at No. ×× Fumin North Road, Xincheng Street, and extracted commissions from the gambling winnings. Around 20:00 on January 13, 2016, the police raided this gambling den, arresting the two defendants as well as gamblers such as Ye, and seizing over 40,000 yuan in gambling funds, including 500 yuan from defendant Wang. During this period, defendant Hong was occasionally responsible for taking cuts, and the two defendants collectively extracted commissions totaling over 40,000 yuan. After the incident, the two defendants returned 40,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Hong during the court trial, and were sufficiently corroborated by witness testimonies from Xiang, Ye, Chu, Zeng, Zhu, Tan, Zheng, He, Liao, Wen, Tian, Li, Zhang, Zeng, Sun, as well as identification records, arrest reports, evidence preservation lists, administrative penalty decisions, confiscated items lists, restitution receipts, population information, and other evidence.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial established that since June 2015, the defendants Chen and Ren had repeatedly transported counterfeit cigarettes for Weng and Lü. On December 20, 2015, Chen, in collusion with Ren, knowingly transported counterfeit cigarettes, driving a BYD car with license plate Yu L×××××, delivering 21 boxes (market value 120,750 RMB) of counterfeit cigarettes from a certain place to the city. As the two drove to the intersection of Xin Hua Road and Century Avenue to hand over the counterfeit cigarettes to Weng and Lü, they were caught on the spot by the inspection team of the tobacco bureau of a certain county. The Henan Tobacco Quality Supervision and Inspection Station identified these cigarettes as counterfeit goods bearing a forged registered trademark. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial. Additionally, testimonies from witnesses Zhu, Li, Xin, a list of seized items, proof from the tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain county, documents from the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, and the defendants' household registration documents serve as evidence, which are sufficient to reach a conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "On the afternoon of December 5, 2012, the prosecution alleged that the defendants Jiang and Wang, after planning, carried tools including a wallpaper knife and a hacksaw blade to the third floor of their workplace, the inner tube branch of Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Factory. Using these tools, they cut three cables totaling 32.97 meters in length (valued at 4,543.15 RMB, with the equipment on the other end of the cables already dismantled and relocated) that were installed on the power switch box used for rubber filtration operations, intending to take them away. Later, when they noticed the factory's security personnel approaching to inspect, defendant Jiang attempted to flee the scene empty-handed but was caught red-handed by the security personnel. Defendant Wang managed to escape the scene empty-handed. On December 19, 2012, law enforcement arrested defendant Wang at the machine repair branch of Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Factory. During the court hearing, defendants Jiang and Wang raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. Their actions were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Wu, Li, and Chen, incident reports, a comprehensive police dispatch record, photos of stolen items, photos of tools used in the crime, lists of evidence collected, lists of items seized, lists of items returned, invoices, price certifications, power of attorney, transfer certificates, details of apprehension, household registration certificates, identification documents, price appraisal reports, and identification records and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 16:00 on January 22, 2015, defendants Cai and Gong, together with \"Monkey\" (identity unknown, handled in a separate case), conspired beforehand and went to the sidewalk at the bus stop in Streetkou, Hongshan District, a certain city. Taking advantage of pedestrian Liu's unawareness, defendant Cai stealthily took a white \"Samsung\" SM-N900 phone valued at 1,600 RMB from Liu's person. Cai then handed the stolen item to defendant Gong for concealment, after which they were caught on the spot by police officers. The stolen item has been recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cai and Gong during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the apprehension and resolution report issued by Qiaokou District branch of the municipal Public Security Bureau; the victim Liu's report and statement; records and lists of seized and returned items and photographs; testimonies from witnesses Pan and Wang; the identification record; the price verification opinion; the identity details of defendants Cai and Gong; the previous criminal judgment against defendant Cai; the confessions and defenses of defendants Cai and Gong; and other materials, which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: On the evening of May 20, 2015, defendants Wang and Jiang, in collaboration with others, went to the area below Building 65 on Shengli East Alley, Zhaobao Mountain Street, Zhenhai District, and the communal bike shed of the Zhaobao Mountain Hotel. They used methods such as pushing and starting the vehicles by connecting wires to steal one red Philip brand electric bicycle and one blue Lvyuan electric bicycle belonging to the victims Wan and Wang, which were parked at the aforementioned locations. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycles were valued at RMB 780 and RMB 2340, respectively. On the evening of the 24th of the same month, defendants Wang, Jiang, and Zuo, along with others, went to a riverside in a village in Luotuo Street, Zhenhai District. They used methods such as crowbar door-breaking and screw dismantling to steal three electric motors from three pump houses located by the river and owned by the village's economic cooperation society. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric motors were valued at a total of RMB 7810. Following the incident, family members of defendant Zuo compensated the victim unit, the village economic cooperation society, for the economic loss of RMB 7810. These facts are undisputed by defendants Wang, Jiang, and Zuo during the court hearing. Additionally, there are documentary evidence including the defendants’ identification, arrest process, statement of circumstances, theft report, copies of invoices from the national tax bureau, seizure list, restitution list, photos, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, and release certificate. These are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu, Gao, and Shen, the statements of victims Wan and Wang, the price evaluation opinions, and the identification records, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zuo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: On December 12, 2015, at around 11 pm, defendants Dan, Zhao, and Pan, along with Liu and others, went to a karaoke room A05 at a certain town in a certain county to sing. Later, defendant Pan went to room A07, where Wan, Shi, Yang, Wang, and others were, and turned off the sound system in room A07 under the pretense of making a phone call. After being pushed out of room A07, Pan informed those in room A05 that he had been beaten. Upon hearing this, defendant Zhao rushed into room A07 and, after being stopped, charged into the room again with a beer bottle. Defendant Dan used a beer bottle to assault Wan, Shi, Yang, and others, leading to a mutual fight between both parties. Defendant Zhao also slapped Yang's face in the hall. Both parties sustained injuries to varying degrees. According to the assessment, Shi, Wan, Yang, Liu, and Dan all suffered minor injuries. On December 22, 2015, defendants Dan, Zhao, and Pan reached a settlement agreement with Wan, Shi, and Yang, compensating a total of 15,000 yuan for various expenses incurred by Wan and others, and the agreement has been fulfilled. Wan and others expressed forgiveness for the actions of Dan and the others. To prove the charges, the prosecution presented the confessions and defenses of defendants Dan, Zhao, and Pan, statements from victims Wan, Shi, and Yang, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Wang, Ma, Chen, Ma, Zhu, Yan, and Cheng, assessment opinions, the settlement agreement and forgiveness letter, on-site surveillance video, identification records, household registration proofs, the process of arrest, and case solving reports as evidence in court.", "label": {"Dan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendants Lu and Yang lived together as husband and wife in a certain village on a certain street in this city. From November 22 to 24, 2013, the defendant Lu repeatedly allowed Zhang and Cai (both of whom have been administratively punished) to use methamphetamine in the aforementioned location. On November 25, 2013, the defendant Lu allowed Zhang, Cai, and Xu (who has been administratively punished) to use methamphetamine in the said residence. From November 22 to 25, 2013, the defendant Yang was aware that Lu, along with Zhang and Cai, were using drugs at their residence, yet she repeatedly opened the door for Zhang and others, did not stop Lu and others from using drugs, and took methamphetamine into her own room to use it alone. On November 26, 2013, the defendants Lu and Yang were detained administratively for twenty and fifteen days, respectively, by the Dongyang Public Security Bureau due to drug use. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by the defendants Lu and Yang during the trial process, and they are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Cai, and Xu, records of inspections by public security agencies, evidence preservation lists, photos of seized items, on-site test reports, photos of urine tests, drug submission lists, physical evidence examination reports, identification records, administrative punishment decisions, criminal judgment documents, notification of completion of probation, statements provided by police officers, the process of capture, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Lu and Yang, which are sufficient to confirm the allegations.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around midnight in early August 2015, the defendant Wang, introduced and accompanied by the defendant Li, purchased a package of drugs from “The Blind Man” (handled in a separate case) for 1700 RMB. Subsequently, Wang and Li sold the aforementioned drugs to the defendant Sun for 1950 RMB near a certain Internet café in a town in the city. Later, Sun divided the purchased drugs into small packets, some of which were intended for sale. At around 8:00 p.m. on August 10, 2015, Sun sold two small bags of drugs (which, upon testing, were found to contain methamphetamine, weighing a total of 1.67 grams) to an individual named Chen for 450 RMB in front of the Haina Hotel on Huawei Road in a district of the city. After the transaction, Sun was caught on the spot by the police, who seized the drugs involved, the drug money, and a mobile phone used for drug dealing. Sun confessed to the police that the drugs he sold originated from Wang and Li. Under police control and arrangement, Sun contacted Wang and Li by phone, stating that a friend was willing to buy one \"bottle\" of methamphetamine for 400 RMB, and they agreed to transact at the Haina Hotel on Huawei Road in a district of the city. At around 11:00 p.m. on the same day, Wang and Li sold a package of drugs (which, upon testing, was found to contain methamphetamine, weighing 0.60 grams) to individuals named Hou and Lin for 400 RMB at the same location and were promptly caught by the police, who seized the drugs involved, the drug money, and a Xiaomi mobile phone used for drug dealing. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Sun, Wang, and Li during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimonies and identification transcripts of witnesses Chen, Hou, and Lin, along with the search warrant, search record, seizure order, seizure record and inventory, phone call records, arrest procedures and explanations, chemical analysis report No. 1512 (2015) issued by the Zhu Company, the notification of the appraisal opinion, on-site test report, administrative penalty decision, household registration information and criminal record certificates, as well as photos of the scene and physical evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on the evening of May 9, 2019, defendants Wang, Lu, and Yu went to Xiangrui Community, Yongan Community, Bozhou District, a certain city, and stole 5 batteries from an electric tricycle parked downstairs by the victim Tang. Subsequently, defendants Wang, Lu, and Yu went to Shuiyuan Group, Zunjin Village, in the same town, and stole 5 batteries each from electric tricycles parked in the courtyards of victims Ren, Xu, and Yang respectively, totaling 15 batteries. Afterwards, defendants Wang, Lu, and Yu went to a certain community in the same town and stole 4 batteries from an electric tricycle parked downstairs at the home of victim Yu2. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of Bozhou District, a certain city, the 24 stolen batteries were valued at a total of 5,690 yuan. It was further found that defendant Wang received 1,600 yuan of the stolen money, defendant Lu received 1,800 yuan, and defendant Yu received 400 yuan. The aforementioned total of 3,800 yuan in stolen money has been seized by the Bozhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. In addition, a pair of pliers, a mask, and two Sichuan license plates numbered XXXXXX were seized by the Bozhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. After the incident, the families of defendants Wang, Lu, and Yu compensated the victim Tang 1,500 yuan, the victim Ren 1,800 yuan, the victim Xu 1,600 yuan, the victim Yang 1,500 yuan, and the victim Yu2 2,120 yuan, on their behalf. The victims Tang, Ren, Xu, Yang, and Yu2 have all provided written statements indicating their forgiveness of the three defendants.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that on September 17, 2014, the Public Security Bureau of a certain city uncovered a gambling ring in an idle house in a village of that city, arresting 55 participants in gambling activities on the spot, including Yin Jia, Wang, and Zhou, and confiscated 113,500 yuan in gambling funds. It was found that this gambling ring was organized by the defendants Yin in collaboration with Liu (already sentenced) and Zhang (already sentenced). Li (already sentenced) scouted the gambling location and contacted the participants. The defendants Hou, Liu Jia (already sentenced), and Qi Lai (already sentenced) acted as lookouts for the gambling ring. The defendants Yin and Liu (already sentenced) were responsible for taking a cut from the proceeds, while Li Jia (already sentenced) profited from lending money to participants during the gambling sessions. The gambling ring was operational for about three months, organizing gambling sessions with multiple participants in several towns in the northern part of the city. Defendant Yin received illicit gains of 2,000 yuan, while defendant Hou received 1,200 yuan. On September 3, 2015, defendant Yin was listed for arrest by the city's Public Security Bureau, and on April 26, 2017, defendant Yin surrendered to the Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Hou and Yin during the court proceedings and were corroborated by evidence, including the decision to file a case by the city's Public Security Bureau, the confessions of co-defendants Zhang, Liu, Li, Liu Jia, Qi Lai, and Li Jia, identification records, testimonies from witnesses Yin Jia, Wang, and Zhou, the administrative punishment decision by the Public Security Bureau, household registration certificates, the process of being brought to justice, and criminal record evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that from 11 a.m. on March 18, 2014, to 6 p.m. on March 21, 2014, the defendants Han, Zhuang, Gao, and Zhang, in order to claim a debt, illegally detained the victim Cao in places such as Fenglai Clothing Factory in Xinfeng Town, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, and Room 611 of the Hantang Hotel, using methods such as taking turns to guard him, thereby illegally depriving him of his personal freedom for 79 hours. The above facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Cao's statement, witness Xu's testimony, identification records and photographs, accommodation registration forms, video surveillance and situation reports, IOUs, delivery orders, and receipts, household registration information, account of the case, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged that on December 24, 2014, at about 18:51, the defendant Chen was driving a small minivan along Zhenxing Road in a town from north to south when he reached the accident site and knocked down the victim, Ge, who was crossing the road diagonally from west to east. Ge lay on the roadway, and at 18:53:47, he was run over by a small car driven by the defendant Hu, who was also traveling from north to south. Ge died as a result. It was determined that Chen and Hu should bear the main responsibility for the accident. To prove the facts of the accusation, the prosecution presented in court the confessions of the defendants Chen and Hu, the testimony of the witness Xu, the traffic accident site inspection record, site photos, the road traffic accident determination book, the autopsy report, and documentary evidence.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged that starting from October 2018, the defendant Huang recruited individuals such as Li and Wang at a leisure shop located at Hanyang Street No. 108, Unit 19, in a certain district of a certain city to engage in prostitution activities. Defendant Huang managed the prostitutes, while defendant Wang assisted by cleaning the premises and providing meals. The two each took commissions ranging from 30 to 100 RMB per prostitution activity. At the end of 2018, defendant Huang left the premises due to a conflict with defendant Wang. Subsequently, defendant Wang continued managing the prostitutes in the same manner and took commissions. To evade the police, defendant Wang agreed with the prostitutes not to conduct transactions inside the leisure shop. Instead, after soliciting clients, the prostitutes would rent rooms at City Convenient Hotel and Dream Love Hotel in Caidian Street of a certain district in a certain city for transactions, with room expenses paid by defendant Wang. On August 26, 2019, at around 11 PM, Li and Wang were caught by police officers engaging in prostitution with Zhou and Liang, respectively, in rooms 8401 and 8419 of Dream Love Theme Hotel in Caidian Street of a certain district in a certain city. On July 13, 2020, defendant Wang was apprehended by the police; on July 23, 2020, defendant Huang voluntarily surrendered to the police. Further investigation revealed that between August 18 and August 26, 2019, defendant Wang collected a total commission of 1860 RMB from the prostitution activities of Li and Wang. On October 19, 2020, defendant Wang returned the illegal gains of 1860 RMB to this court. The above facts are substantiated by the voluntary guilty plea and signed acknowledgment of the defendants Wang and Huang, who raised no objections during the trial. Additionally, administrative penalty decision documentation, testimonies from witnesses Li, Wang, Zhou, and Liang, confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Huang, records of searches, seizures, retrievals, identification, inspections, screenshots of WeChat transfer records, personal information of defendants Wang and Huang, a detailed account by police officers, and fund settlement receipts from relevant provincial administrative institutions serve as evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: From June to October 2010, the defendants Jiang and Shi, under the name of Guangzhou Xuteng Exhibition Service Co., Ltd., falsely claimed to be able to provide booths at the 108th Autumn China Import and Export Fair held at the Pazhou Complex. They signed the \"Agreement on Cooperation to Participate in the 108th Autumn Fair\" with 21 companies, including Guangzhou Wofu Trading Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Mingsheng Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. They collected deposits totaling RMB 368,100, which was 30% to 50% of the contract amounts, then closed Guangzhou Xuteng Exhibition Co., Ltd. and concealed their contact information to evade debts. Defendant Shi was apprehended and brought to justice on March 4, 2011, and Jiang was apprehended and brought to justice on July 5 of the same year.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It was found through the trial that between August and October 2014, defendant Yang rented houses in certain villages of the county from Jin (A) and Zheng (both handled in separate cases) at a daily rate of 500 yuan to use as gambling venues. Yang gathered gamblers Huang, Sun (A), Yan, Lin (first Lin) and others to open a casino using the \"dice six\" format. During this period, defendant Yang hired defendant Jiang and others to assist at the casino, collectively making a profit of over 13,000 yuan from rake-offs. Defendant Jiang personally made an illegal profit of about 2,000 yuan. Defendants Yang and Jiang surrendered themselves to the public security authorities on August 5 and August 23, 2015, respectively. After the case was uncovered, Yang and Jiang handed over 15,000 yuan and 2,000 yuan, respectively, to the authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Jiang during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jin (B), Jin (C), Lin (first Lin), Yan, Huang, Lin (second Lin), Sun, and others, as well as the confessions of co-defendants Zheng and Jin (A), recognition records, proof of surrender, criminal history records, explanations, records of capture, the process of bringing to case, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On December 11, 2014, the defendant Yang, in collusion with the defendant Wang, drove a rented black Hyundai SUV with the license plate number Wan C×××××. They equipped themselves with masks and gloves and entered the home of the victim Han, located on the south side of the west gate of Shangtie Nanhu Community in this city, by climbing over the gate. The two defendants took turns searching the premises and stole cash amounting to 8,200 RMB from a notebook in Han's home, after which they drove away from the scene. Defendants Yang and Wang each received a share of 4,100 RMB. On December 31, 2014, defendant Yang was apprehended. On January 5, 2015, defendant Wang surrendered to the authorities. In support of these charges, the prosecution has presented and provided the court with evidence, including photographs, lists of vehicle and stolen money seizures and returns, vehicle rental contracts, household registration certificates, the circumstances of the defendants' arrests, verdicts, testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Zhao, and Feng, statements from the victims Han and Shi, confessions and defenses from defendants Yang and Wang, and diagrams of the crime scene.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Guangling District in a certain city accused that, in August 2015, defendants Ni, Xu, and Lu, after mutual discussion, placed video game consoles with gambling functions in a rented residential house at No. 37-3, Fumin East Street, Lidian Town, Guangling District, in a certain city, for others to engage in gambling activities. They agreed to split the profits equally. On the evening of December 16, 2015, police officers from the Guangling Sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city conducted an inspection of the residential house and seized six video game consoles suspected of having gambling functions. According to the public security agency's assessment, three of these were damaged and could not function properly; the other three were functioning normally and had gambling functions (with a total of 11 independently operable units). After being apprehended, defendants Ni, Xu, and Lu truthfully confessed to the above facts. The defendants Ni, Xu, and Lu raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial and there was sufficient evidence to affirm these facts, including the defendants' confession records at the public security agency, the testimony records of witnesses Zhou, Tang, and He, who were absent from court, photos of physical evidence, a list of seized items, the identification of gaming equipment with gambling functions, the rental agreement, the accounts of the case, and household registration information.", "label": {"Ni": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it was found that on the afternoon of August 20, 2020, the defendant Duo sold the green diesel generator set, which belonged to the victim Hu and was stored in a factory in Beiguo Village, Jiangfang Township, Fucheng County, to the defendant Zhang. Defendant Zhang purchased the generator set despite knowing that the purchase price was significantly below the market value. According to the price appraisal conclusion issued by the Fucheng County Price Appraisal Center, the stolen generator set was valued at 25,650 yuan. After the incident, defendant Zhang returned the illegal proceeds of 5,008 yuan to the Fucheng County Prosecutor's Office. It was further found that defendant Zhang voluntarily went to the public security agency after being summoned by phone and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. The above facts were not disputed by defendant Duo and defendant Zhang during the court hearing. There is also evidence such as the confessions and defenses of defendant Duo and defendant Zhang, the statement of the victim Hu, the testimony of witness Liu, photographs of the stolen items, invoices, purchase and sale contracts, identification records, site identification records and photos, site inspection records and photos, the price appraisal conclusion, proof of returned illegal proceeds, WeChat screenshots, arrest records, investigation transcripts, letter of understanding, receipts, proof of fine payment, guilty plea deposition, and the household registration of defendant Duo and defendant Zhang, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Duo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that between August 1 and 5, 2014, the defendants Yu and Wu provided drugs on three occasions and allowed Zhen, Yi, Han, and Miao (all minors) to use them in Room 321 of the GreenTree Inn Hotel in Lanshan District, Linyi City. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Yu and Wu during the trial; the testimonies of witnesses Zhen, Yi, Han, and Miao; household registration documents; and the circumstances of the arrest all provide sufficient evidence to establish these facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that in the early morning of July 20, 2016, the defendants Zhong and Yi went to a residential area in a certain district of a certain city. Using lock-picking and wire connections, they stole a blue Luyuan brand women's electric bicycle parked in the hallway of the residential building by the victim Yang. One evening in mid-July 2016, defendants Zhong and Yi went to a certain community in a certain district and, using lock-picking and wire connections, stole a red Qianjiang brand two-wheeled motorcycle parked in the building's hallway by the victim Liu. The motorbike was valued at 1,800 RMB, according to appraisal. In the early morning of August 13, 2016, defendant Yi went to a certain community in a certain district and, using lock-picking and wire connections, stole a red electric tricycle parked by the victim Wang. It was also found that when defendant Yi was questioned by the public security authorities due to suspicious behavior, he truthfully confessed to the theft crimes. Additionally, it was discovered that defendant Zhong was administratively detained for five days by a southern county public security bureau in a certain province on May 12, 2016, for drug use. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Zhong and Yi during the court trial, and they were supported by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, the decision to file a case, the details of the arrest, explanatory notes, the administrative penalty decision, Zhong and Yi’s household registration data, identification records, seizure decision and list, price certification conclusion No. 34 (2016) issued by the price certification center of a certain district of a certain city along with annexes, copies of vehicle driving permits for Yang and others, on-site inspection records, diagrams and photos, identification records and photos, search records and photos, seizure decision and list, price identification conclusion and annexes, witness Zhang’s testimony, and statements from victims Liu, Yang, and Wang, as well as confessions from defendants Zhong and Yi, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: In October 1989, the defendant Yang held a wedding ceremony with Xing and lived together as husband and wife, and on January 26, 2010, they registered their marriage. Around 2008, Yang also cohabited with the defendant Ren, who was aware that Yang had a spouse but still lived with him as husband and wife, and they had a daughter together on June 9, 2010. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the report materials, the registration card of women of childbearing age, the marriage registration review form, the application for reissuing a marriage certificate, marriage certificates, the course of the incident, the procedure of bringing to justice, as well as witness testimonies and confessions of the defendants, among other evidences. Accordingly,", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain jurisdiction charged that on April 9, 2014, the defendant Liu, while serving as the acting director of the High-tech Materials Branch of Wuhan Xinshi Metallurgical Equipment Engineering Co., Ltd., together with the defendant Ceng, exploited the convenience of his position responsible for reclaiming casting slag. During the transportation of casting slag within the Wugang plant area, they illegally transported out and appropriated 8.15 tons of waste steel slag. On April 16, 2014, the defendant Liu, in collusion with the defendant Ceng, used the aforementioned method to stealthily transport out 13 tons of waste steel slag from the Wugang plant area, but were discovered by staff from the Wugang Security Department and subsequently handed over to the public security organs for handling. An appraisal determined that the aforementioned waste steel slag was valued at a total of 28,764 RMB. The public prosecution agency, in support of the alleged facts, presented and read the following evidence: 1. the process of solving and capturing the crime; 2. identity materials; 3. report materials; 4. related documentary evidence and on-site photos; 5. testimonies from witnesses Wang A, Wang B, Lin, Du, Zheng, Zhao, Yuan, Gao, Li, Zhou, and others; 6. identification records; 7. the decision on seizure and the list of seized items; 8. price appraisal report; 9. confessions and defenses by defendants Liu and Ceng.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that during January 2011, the defendants Yuan and Guo, in violation of national regulations, decided to engage in the fireworks and firecrackers business without obtaining the required business license for such operation. After planning, they engaged in the business of fireworks and firecrackers. Guo, who worked at the Yanzhou City Celebration Fireworks and Firecrackers Operation Station, provided the procurement information and the station's anti-counterfeit labels to facilitate Yuan's procurement and the production of false anti-counterfeit labels. After contacting retail stalls, Yuan was responsible for purchasing fireworks and firecrackers from a certain place and delivering them to various retail stalls. Subsequently, they sold fireworks and firecrackers to retail spots operated by Zhang and others, with the illegal business amounting to over 150,000 yuan. The public prosecutor read and presented the evidence in court as set out in the indictment, including the testimonies from witnesses Han, Zhang, Yin Jia, Huang, Gao, Yin Yi, Ma Jia, Hu, Peng, Ma Yi, Wang Jia, Li Jia, Li Yi, Shang, Wang Yi, Yang, the statements from the defendants Yuan, Guo Yuan, sales lists, IOUs, identification records, expert opinions, lists of seized items, lists of destroyed items, fireworks and firecrackers anti-counterfeit codes, certificate from the Yanzhou City Administration of Work Safety, case handling instructions, apprehension process, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On July 24, 2013, at around 14:00, the defendant Tian was playing cards at a store owned by Li in a village in a town in a district of a certain city, when a verbal dispute arose with the victim Xu over trivial matters. They were later persuaded to reconcile. At around 15:00 on the same day, defendant Tian, still upset, gathered defendant Liu and returned to Li's store, where Tian injured victim Xu with a knife. According to the identification report, victim Xu suffered sharp injuries to the head and left waist/flank, including a fracture of the left temporal skull bone and a residual scalp scar over 8cm in length, as well as a scar approximately 6.5cm long on the left waist/flank. The injuries were assessed as minor injuries. On October 15, 2013, defendants Tian and Liu were apprehended, and both truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts upon arrival. After the incident, defendants Tian and Liu compensated victim Xu for economic losses and obtained Xu's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tian and Liu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by statements from victim Xu, testimonies from witnesses Li and Peng, the forensic injury assessment report, identification records, inspection records, the agreement document, the letter of understanding, the explanation of return, the incident process, the administrative penalty decision, and the household registration certificates of defendants Tian and Liu, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that from early July 2015 to the 17th, defendants Liu, Peng, and Li, after consultations, established a casino in succession within a residential house opposite the Yinzhou Bank in Heyi Village, Zhanqi Town, Yinzhou District, Ningbo City, and another house beside a kindergarten. The casino operated using hard Pai Gow tiles for gambling purposes. Defendant Liu was responsible for leasing the premises, while defendants Peng and Li were in charge of taking cuts from the profits, earning more than 5,000 yuan during this period. On August 7, 2015, defendants Liu, Peng, and Li voluntarily reported to the public security authorities after being summoned by phone and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. During the trial at this court, defendants Liu, Peng, and Li returned the illegal profits of 5,000 yuan to the court. These facts are uncontested by defendants Liu, Peng, and Li during the trial process and are corroborated by witness testimonies from individuals such as Chen Moujia, Chen Mouyi, the house rental agreements, receipts, the circumstances of their coming forward, and identification documents of the defendants, which are sufficient to support the determination.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it is found that: In late June 2015, on a certain day, defendant Liu, along with Liu A (handled in a separate case) and Huang (handled in a separate case), rode in a small truck driven by defendant Mei to load construction materials at the Sanyangsi Village Committee, Jiangchang Town, in this city. Acting on a sudden impulse, defendant Liu, together with Liu A, Huang, and defendant Mei, stole 3605.2 meters of overhead insulated wire, model JKLYJ-1/1×95, valued at 22,280 yuan, which was stored by Tianmen Taimeng Electric Power Co., Ltd. in the Sanyangsi Village driving school. They later sold the stolen overhead insulated wire to a scrap station, receiving proceeds of over 2,600 yuan. Liu A, Huang, and defendant Mei each received 100 yuan, and the remaining funds went to defendant Liu. On October 8, 2015, defendant Mei voluntarily went to the Jiangchang Police Station of Tianmen City Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed the theft of the overhead insulated wire. It is also found that on December 18, 2015, defendants Liu and Mei jointly compensated the victim unit, Tianmen Taimeng Electric Power Co., Ltd., for economic losses of 22,280 yuan and received their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liu and Mei during the trial. These facts are substantiated by the household registration certificates of defendants Liu and Mei, testimonies from witnesses Zhou, Wen, Xiong, Zhang, Wang, Xiao, and by evidence such as the case briefings and capture process provided by the authorities, the receipt and letter of forgiveness provided by the victim unit, and the evaluation report from the Tianmen City Price Certification Center, which are sufficient for affirmation.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: From March 2012 to early 2013, the defendant Zhang, who was then the Party branch secretary and village head of a certain village in a town of a certain city, took advantage of his position during the rural dilapidated housing renovation process in a certain town of a certain city. Together with the defendant Meng, a villager of that village, they used forged materials to fraudulently obtain national subsidies for dilapidated housing renovation amounting to 15,000 RMB. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Meng were summoned to the case. To prove the aforementioned charges, the prosecution conducted an in-court interrogation of the defendants, read the statements made by Zhang and Meng at the investigation agency, presented testimonies from witnesses Yang and Zhu, among others, and presented evidence such as the separate files of rural dilapidated housing renovation in a certain city, the detailed list of fund disbursement, and the case initiation documents.", "label": {"Zhang": [], "Meng": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate charged: In the early morning of September 6, 2012, the defendants Lu and Zuo, along with \"Zhao\" and \"Qian\" (both handled in separate cases), had a dispute with Wang (who has already been administratively punished) over a trivial matter at Jinledi Leisure Club in Pingwang Community, Zhouxiang Town, Cixi City. During the conflict, defendant Lu was injured by Wang, who then hid. Unable to find Wang, defendants Lu, Zuo, \"Zhao,\" and \"Qian\" unjustifiably assaulted the victim Mou with beer bottles and by punching and kicking. Forensic examination determined that Mou's external injuries resulted in a minor injury to the left parietal bone and a superficial injury to the scalp. After being apprehended, defendants Lu and Zuo truthfully confessed to the criminal acts mentioned above. During the trial, defendant Zuo compensated the victim Mou with 8,000 RMB and obtained Mou's understanding. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Lu and Zuo during the court hearing and were corroborated by the victim Mou's statement, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Hua A, Hua B, Luo, and Wu, identification records, medical records, forensic assessment of bodily injuries, public security administrative penalty decision, prior criminal judgment, capture process, letter of understanding, and the basic household information of defendants Lu and Zuo. Taking into account the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the crime, the prosecution suggested a sentencing range of six months to one year of fixed-term imprisonment for defendants Lu and Zuo.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zuo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charged: From the end of 2009 to August 15, 2012, the defendants Liu and Xu, a couple, for profit, engaged in illegal internet cafe operations in a rented house at No. 170, Qidong Road, a village in Gutang Street, in a certain city, without obtaining the necessary network cultural business license and business license, making illegal profits exceeding 13,000 RMB. On August 15, 2012, police officers from the Gutang Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau discovered the internet café operated by the defendants Liu and Xu and seized one computer involved in the case, along with a router and a switch. After being brought to justice, both defendants Liu and Xu truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. During the trial, the defendants Liu and Xu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which were confirmed by the testimony of witnesses Huang, He, Jiang, and Ye, identification records and photos, search records and photos, special receipts for temporarily seized items, inventory of seized items and photos, account opening information, detailed computer business income records, detailed Zhejiang Telecom customer call records, the process of being brought to justice, and the identity information of defendants Liu and Xu, all of which are sufficient to establish the conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Li, Peng, and Liu have no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. The People's Procuratorate of Tianjia'an District, Huainan City, charges: Defendants Li, Peng, and Liu are all members of a pyramid scheme organization. The victim, Gong, was deceived by this organization and brought to a certain location on September 21, 2015. On the evening of September 22, 2015, Gong was taken to the hideout of the pyramid scheme organization, where Li, Peng, and Liu subsequently monitored him and restricted his personal freedom. Around 12 noon on September 25, 2015, while being taken to a \"class\" by Li, Peng, Liu, and others, Gong called for help from others. The three assaulted Gong, and he was later rescued by the public security authorities. The People's Procuratorate of Tianjia'an District believes that the defendants, Li, Peng, and Liu, unlawfully restricted another person's freedom, violating Articles X and X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Therefore, they should be held criminally responsible for the crime (specific crime not mentioned). The prosecution requests the court to sentence them according to the law. Defendants Li, Peng, and Liu do not contest the criminal facts and charges. Upon investigation, it was found that defendants Li, Peng, and Liu are members of the pyramid scheme organization. On September 21, 2015, victim Gong was deceived and brought to a certain location and was taken to the organization's hideout the following night. Li, Peng, and Liu monitored Gong, taking him to \"classes\" and restricting his freedom. Around 12 noon on September 25, 2015, while being taken to a \"class\" by Li, Peng, Liu, and others, Gong called for help, and the three assaulted him. Gong was later rescued by the public security authorities. On September 26, 2015, the three defendants were given administrative penalties of fourteen days of detention and a fine of five hundred yuan. The facts above are undisputed by defendants Li, Peng, and Liu and are corroborated by Gong's testimony, the confessions of the three defendants, on-site investigation records, photos, identification transcripts, explanation notes, arrest records, and household registration proofs, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from March to September 2015, Li (fugitive), a co-defendant, rented an apartment in the Xiangjiang Century City neighborhood in a certain city of a certain province as a workshop, investing over 100,000 yuan. Yu (convicted) provided the technology, and Guo (convicted) was responsible for the gambling funds and daily management. Defendants Huang, He, Li, and Li2 (fugitive), along with others, participated in online gambling. By September 3, 2016, the gambling funds had been transferred to Guo's gambling account totaling 474,997 yuan. During the gambling period, Guo paid Huang 1,000 yuan, He 4,000 yuan, and Li 1,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Huang, He, and Li during the court hearing. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by pieces of evidence including permanent resident basic information forms, detention certificates, arrest records, explanations of the suspect's capture situation, detention proofs, receipts, temporary detention certificates, records of previous convictions, bank card transaction details, account balance inquiries, Guo's computer latest spreadsheet from June 27, China Minsheng Bank transaction details, criminal judgments, testimonies from witnesses Wan and Yu1, confessions and defenses from co-defendants Yu and Guo, electronic evidence inspection records, and identification records, which are sufficient to conclude the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that at around 23:00 on May 22, 2012, the defendant Tang vandalized Xu's vehicle, which was parked in the Aimin neighborhood of Baoqing County, and then left. Xu, claiming to retrieve the vehicle, called for victims Cong and Ye and others. Seeing this, Tang drove to find the defendant Li and others, preparing sticks and knives. During this time, Cong called the police. Subsequently, Tang, Li, and others returned to the Aimin neighborhood. Defendant Tang injured victim Xu in the chest with a knife, and defendant Li injured victim Cong's left face and left shoulder with a jack lever. Forensic identification determined that victim Xu suffered minor injuries, while victim Cong sustained mild injuries. After investigation, on January 18, 2013, defendants Tang and Li were summoned to the Zhendong Police Station, where they truthfully confessed their crimes.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on August 8, 2014, around 8 p.m., the defendants Zhong, Deng, and Dong, after drinking heavily at Zhong's home, went to the home of the victim, Liu, under the pretense of asking for wages, and caused a disturbance under the influence of alcohol. The defendants Zhong, Deng, and Dong injured Liu, Liu A, Liu's parents Liu A and Zhou, Liu's elder brother Liu, and Liu's daughter Liu B, and also damaged the doors and windows of Liu's house. According to the assessment, the injuries to Liu, Liu A, Zhou, Liu, and Liu B were all minor. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhong, Deng, and Dong during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the statements of the victims Liu and Liu, testimony from witnesses Yin and Pei, records of the scene investigation, diagrams and photos made by the public security organs, forensic conclusions, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts. In the civil compensation part of this case, through mediation conducted by the court, both parties reached a compensation agreement, where the defendants Zhong, Deng, and Dong were to compensate the victims a total of 30,000 yuan for personal injuries and property damages, which has been fully paid, and the victims have forgiven the actions of the three defendants.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from April 2013 to early May, defendants Zhu and Huang set up a casino by enticing others to gamble at a convenience store opposite Building 5, No. 22, Jihua Sixth Road, Chancheng District, in a certain city. They used a poker game called \"Three Cards, Big Eats Small\" to attract gamblers and generated profits by taking a cut from the bets. Defendant Zhu was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Huang handled the rake. At around midnight on May 8, 2013, the police apprehended defendants Zhu and Huang at the aforementioned convenience store and confiscated gambling equipment, including a set of poker cards and a round table, on the spot. Defendants Zhu and Huang did not contest these facts during trial, and the facts were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Xu, Li (A), Li (B), Zhang, Gan, and Zhou, as well as the record of identification, the inventory of seized items, the account of their arrest, household registration documents, and the statements and identification records of defendants Zhu and Huang during the investigation phase, all of which sufficiently establish the case.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on August 1, 2013, at approximately 11:00 PM, the defendant Song, in order to collect a debt, invited the defendants Yang, Zhang, and others to forcibly abduct the victim, Huang, using violent means such as dragging, in front of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China branch on Qianjin Second Road in a certain district of this city. They took the victim to \"Longyuan Bath City\" at No. 23, Siming Road, Dongxihu District, where they illegally restricted his personal freedom and forced him to write an IOU for 60,000 RMB. At around 2:00 AM the next day, the defendant Song and others took the victim Huang to the Construction Bank branch on Gutian Second Road in Dongxihu District of this city and released him after receiving 20,000 RMB in cash withdrawn by the victim. Following the victim's report to the police, the public security authorities, based on clues, successively captured the defendants Song, Yang, and Zhang on August 6, 30, and 31, 2013. According to the forensic examination opinion, the victim Huang sustained injuries to the head, face, and both lower limbs, among other areas, resulting in a Grade I traumatic brain injury and multiple soft tissue injuries, which were classified as minor injuries. The defendants did not dispute the above facts during the court trial. These facts are corroborated by evidence such as the permanent resident information form, the wanted persons registration information form, the apprehension and case-solving process by the public security organ, the IOU and other documentary evidence; witness testimony from a person named A; the victim Huang's statement; and the forensic examination report, which are sufficient to establish these charges.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 12 p.m. on September 11, 2011, defendant Xia, in order to demand repayment from Chen, collaborated with defendant Zhang and others to find Chen at Xiaoran Leisure Villa in a district's Xiaoshan area. They assaulted Chen and forcibly took him to Aqian Clothing Store in Sanjiang Commercial Building, Xixing Street, in a district for detention. During this time, they made Chen make phone calls to raise money. It was not until around 4 p.m. the next day, after Chen returned 200,000 yuan to defendant Xia and wrote a repayment agreement, that he was released. On March 28, 2014, at around 12 p.m., defendant Xia, again in order to demand repayment from Chen, collaborated with defendant Zhang and others to find Chen at Suoqian Restaurant in a district's Xiaoshan area. They assaulted Chen and forcibly took him to Aqian Clothing Store in Sanjiang Commercial Building, Xixing Street, a district, for detention. During this time, they assaulted and threatened Chen, forcing him to repay the money. It was not until around 2:30 p.m. that day that Chen was rescued. After defendants Xia and Zhang were brought to justice, they truthfully confessed the above-mentioned process of their joint crime. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xia and Zhang during the court hearing, and are corroborated by victim Chen's statement, testimonies from witnesses Li, Ye, Zhong, Xu, Wang Jia, Sheng, Wang Yi, Cao, Fu, and Ni, an explanation of the incident, situation description, on-the-spot investigation materials, search records, identification records, receipt of evidence material list, evidence retrieval list, mediation agreement, receipt, household registration certificate, administrative penalty decision, and other evidence, which is sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that around midnight on July 30, 2013, the victim, Peng, had an argument with the employees Zhang, Chen, and Zhu at the Jinshengyi Leisure Club in Huangmabu Lezhujiao Village, Xixiang Subdistrict, Bao'an District, Shenzhen. The defendants, Zhang, Chen, and Zhu, dragged Peng into room 309 of the leisure club, assaulted him, and detained him in room 308. Subsequently, Peng, fearing further assault, attempted to escape by jumping out of the window of room 308 and was injured in the process. The police apprehended Chen and Zhu at the scene of the crime. On August 26, 2013, Zhang was arrested by the police at the Huangtian Police Station in Shenzhen. It was determined that Peng's injuries were minor. After the incident, Zhang, Chen, and Zhu compensated Peng for medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs, totaling 208,000 RMB, and received Peng's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang, Chen, and Zhu during the trial, and there was corroborating evidence verified through court proceedings, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that since December 2015, the defendants Peng, Fu, Jiang, Zhu, and \"Dudu\" (handled in a separate case), among others, opened a casino with the purpose of making a profit at No. 1, 77 Gate, 5th Block, Honggangcheng Street in this district, organizing people to gamble using the card game \"Chulaike.\" Defendant Peng was fully responsible for the casino's operations and promised that the profits would be divided among the four defendants and \"Dudu\" according to shares. At about 18:00 on December 22, 2015, when the four defendants gathered Ye and more than 20 others to gamble at the aforementioned location again, they were caught on the spot by the police. The scene yielded a seizure of gambling funds amounting to 66,350 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Peng, Fu, Jiang, and Zhu during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the case-breaking and arrest process records and case handling instructions provided by public security organs; identity materials and criminal records of defendants Peng, Fu, Jiang, and Zhu; evidence preservation list and physical evidence photos; administrative penalty decision documents; and witness testimonies and identification records from individuals such as Ma, Liu, and Ye, among others, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: 1. Around 12:00 on December 11, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Liu, after planning, proceeded with Xiao driving a black motorcycle carrying Liu to the section in front of the \"Jiayi\" shoe material factory at Sunshine Community, Qingyang Street, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the unpreparedness of the victim Zeng, they snatched a “Samsung” GT-7100 mobile phone valued at 1,924 RMB from Zeng. 2. Around 12:00 on December 19, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Liu, after planning, proceeded with Xiao driving a black motorcycle carrying Liu to the section in front of the \"Haolai Chuan\" restaurant at Peace Road, Qinghua Community, Qingyang Street, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the unpreparedness of the victim Li, they snatched an “Apple” iPhone 5 mobile phone valued at 3,370 RMB from Li. Around 10:00 on December 20, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Liu were apprehended at the Yingbin Hotel, Xibian Village, in a certain town. After the incident, the “Samsung” GT-7100 mobile phone was seized from Liu and returned to the victim Zeng; cash amounting to 2,100 RMB was seized from Liu, and cash amounting to 800 RMB was seized from Xiao, both returned to the victim Li. In summary, the defendants Xiao and Liu jointly committed 2 counts of snatching, involving stolen goods valued at 5,294 RMB. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Liu during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victims Zeng and Li, the seizure decision documents, seizure records, inventory of seized items, property storage inventory, lists of seized and returned items, household registration certificates, basic information sheets of permanent residents, criminal judgment No. 255 of 2008 Hanxingchuzi, criminal judgment No. 173 of 2011 Jinxingchuzi, criminal ruling No. 239 of 2011 Quanxingzhongzi, criminal files, apprehension records provided by public security organs, incident investigation records, an appraisal opinion on the price of the mobile phones, site identification records, and photographs, which are sufficient to establish the charge.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution's charges, in January 2014, the defendants Pan and Zhang, in a certain town, committed three acts of theft, either separately or together, by scaling walls to enter premises, stealing a total of two electric bicycles with the stolen goods valued at 3,085 RMB. Among these, defendant Pan committed three thefts, while defendant Zhang committed two. The specific criminal facts are stated as follows: 1. At around 2 a.m. on January 19, 2014, defendant Pan went to the home of victim Mo at a certain village, certain town, and fled the scene after being discovered by the victim while attempting to steal items. 2. At around 2 a.m. on January 21, 2014, defendants Pan and Zhang went to the home of victim Wang at a certain village, certain town, and stole a Giant brand electric bicycle, with the stolen goods valued at 1,600 RMB. 3. At around 2 a.m. on January 23, 2014, defendants Pan and Zhang went to the home of victim Xu at a certain community, certain town, and stole a Lvyuan brand electric bicycle, with the stolen goods valued at 1,485 RMB. This case came to light after the victims reported it, and the public security authorities conducted an investigation. After being apprehended, defendants Pan and Zhang truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. Following the incident, the public security authorities seized the stolen goods involved in the case and returned them to the victims. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Pan and Zhang during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the statements of victims Mo, Wang, and Xu; the confessions of defendants Pan and Zhang; the written records of identification and location of the theft scenes; documentary evidence such as sales receipts and purchase invoices; a list of collected evidence; a price appraisal certificate; a list of items returned; case registration form; narrative of the incident and capture; re-education through labor decision; household registration certificates; and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Pan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged, and this court has verified through investigation, that the defendants Hu and Xu jointly operated the XX Wholesale Department at Building XX, Victory New Village, North City, in a certain city. Since April 8, 2014, after their tobacco retail license was revoked, defendants Hu and Xu illegally operated and sold tobacco products without obtaining a new tobacco retail license. On January 26, 2016, various cigarettes totaling 938 cartons were seized from this wholesale department by the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of the city. According to appraisal, the confiscated cigarettes were valued at a total of 158,215 RMB. This court also verified that on April 12, 2016, after being notified by phone by the public security authorities, defendants Hu and Xu voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. After the incident, 938 cartons of cigarettes were seized by the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of the city. Defendants Hu and Xu raised no objections to these facts during the court hearing. The facts are supported by the cigarette identification and inspection report, seizure decision documents, seizure inventory list, price appraisal certificate, case transfer documents, case report, prior registration and preservation approval documents, city Tobacco Monopoly Bureau inquiry records, inspection records, list of sampled and collected evidence, proof issued by the city's Tobacco Monopoly Bureau showing that defendants Hu and Xu did not have a tobacco retail license, the city's Tobacco Monopoly Bureau license approval form, photographs of the cigarettes, the process of apprehension, basic resident information, and other evidence. The evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that around 10 p.m. on November 30, 2016, defendants Guo and Zhao were dining at the Yaomei Spicy Restaurant on Dam No. 2 Road in Danjiangkou City. They had a verbal conflict with the victim, Wang Yi, who was dining at the same table, which led to a disagreement. Guo and Zhao, feeling dissatisfied, splashed liquor on Wang Yi and threw utensils at him. Subsequently, they struck Wang Yi with beer bottles filled with beer, causing injuries to his head and face. According to a forensic evaluation, the facial injuries of the victim Wang Yi were classified as minor injury level two, and the scalp lacerations as slight injuries. During the trial, mediated by the court, defendants Guo and Zhao and victim Wang Yi reached a compensation agreement regarding the civil compensation part: Defendants Guo and Zhao agreed to pay a one-time compensation of 35,000 yuan to Wang Yi for all economic losses incurred due to the injuries (excluding the 5,000 yuan already paid for medical expenses, and the compensation has been fulfilled). Once this amount is paid, the victim Wang Yi shall not seek any further compensation from defendants Guo and Zhao for any costs incurred from these injuries. Wang Yi provided a written statement forgiving the intentional harm caused by defendants Guo and Zhao and requested that the judicial authorities show leniency in their sentencing. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Guo and Zhao during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Wang Yi, testimonies from witnesses Li and Wang Jia, diagrams and photos from the crime scene, the forensic injury assessment report from Danjiangkou Siyuan Forensic Judicial Identification Institute, audiovisual materials, the capture process, household registration proof, and the compensation agreement, receipt, and letter of forgiveness, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention"], "Zhao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on May 18, 2016, at around 7 p.m., the defendants Yang, Liu, and Song were dining at a certain restaurant in a district of a certain city. Around 10 p.m. on the same day, Yang had a dispute with a staff member of the restaurant, Wang. Subsequently, the restaurant's lobby manager, Zhu, called the police, and officers Xu and Qin from the Jiulongyuan Police Station of the Jiulongpo District Sub-bureau of the Municipal Public Security Bureau responded to the scene to perform their duties in accordance with the law. During their duty execution, Yang, Liu, Song, and others caused a disturbance, surrounded, insulted, and intimidated Officer Xu, knocking him to the ground and continuing to assault him violently. Yang and Liu held onto Xu's left lower leg, repeatedly grabbing Xu's lower body and other parts, while Song slapped Xu on the back, resulting in multiple soft tissue injuries to Xu. Yang and Liu falsely claimed \"the police are beating people,\" causing confusion and attracting onlookers unaware of the truth. Song repeatedly intimidated, threatened, and insulted Xu, causing a negative social impact. Yang, Liu, Song, and others were subsequently apprehended by officers who arrived on the scene for support. An assessment determined that Xu's injuries were minor. After the incident, the defendants Yang, Liu, and Song apologized to Xu, and Xu expressed forgiveness for their actions. The above facts were acknowledged by the defendants Yang, Liu, and Song during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the circumstances of their arrest, detention certificate, bail decision, household information, administrative penalty decision by the public security bureau, 110 call records, police dispatch details, recognition transcripts, injury photos, medical records, forensic appraisal reports, video materials, letters of understanding, police identification, and testimonies from witnesses Xu, Qin, Zhu, Wang1, Wang2, Yao, as well as confessions from the defendants Yang, Liu, and Song, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuxi City accuses: From January to December 2020, the defendant Cheng established studios at Room 1009, Fortune Center, and apartments 2216 and 1909 in B6, Wanda Plaza in a certain city. He employed defendants Wei, Sa, and others (all handled in separate cases) as salespersons. Defendant Cheng organized and directed the aforementioned salespersons to impersonate staff from Artron Art Network, using pre-designed scripts through chat applications like WeChat to contact victims holding collectibles. They fabricated the fact that there were company experts providing free appraisals and used inflated evaluation prices of collectibles to gain the victims' trust. Subsequently, the salespersons fraudulently charged \"auction listing fees\" of 1500 RMB per item from the victims under the pretense of \"helping clients auction collectibles online.\" Once clients paid the fees, Defendant Cheng uploaded images of their collectibles to an online auction platform that lacked transaction capabilities for \"auctioning\" and then misappropriated the \"auction fees\" under the guise of failed auctions. Using the aforementioned method, Defendant Cheng and others swindled over 800 victims like Jin from a certain district in the city, totaling over 1,806,000 RMB. Of this amount, Defendant Cheng was involved in over 1,806,000 RMB; Defendant Wei was involved in over 99,000 RMB; Defendant Sa was involved in over 96,000 RMB. On December 18, 2020, Defendants Cheng, Wei, and Sa were apprehended by a certain agency in a certain district of a certain city. Subsequently, Defendants Wei and Sa truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal activities. After the case occurred, Defendant Wei returned 17,965 RMB; Defendant Sa returned 17,680 RMB of illicit money.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sa": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged that in late February 2015, the defendants Zhang and Zhou, along with others, went to the section of Suzhou Linglan Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. on a certain road in a town of the city, and to the north of the intersection of Longjiang Road and Xingang Road of a certain place, where they stole 236 meters and 240 meters of cable wire from roadside manhole covers. The total value of the items was 3,358 RMB.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the afternoon of April 11, 2014, defendant Zhang, believing that his wife, Xu, had been bullied by others, developed a desire for revenge. Together with defendant Chen, Xin, and Wang, they went to a game room operated by Lu A. After arriving at the game room, defendant Zhang threatened Gu Yi with a knife to hand over the person who had a conflict with Xu. When Lu came out of the room, Zhang demanded that he hand over the person, which led to a verbal altercation. Defendant Zhang then picked up a broom and damaged one side of a mahjong table in the game room. He subsequently moved forward to beat Lu, while defendant Chen and others used wooden sticks to strike Lu’s head. According to the forensic identification by the Binhai County Public Security Bureau, the damage to Lu's head was classified as minor injury. After the incident, defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ on May 14, 2014; defendant Chen did the same on July 18, 2014, and truthfully confessed their crimes. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the trial and were confirmed by statements from the victim Lu, Gu Yi, testimonies from witnesses Xu, Fu, Gu Jia, among others, the criminal judgment (2011) Bin Xing Chu Zi No. 0018 from the People’s Court of Binhai County, the household registration certificate issued by the Binhai County Public Security Bureau, the case report, situation explanations, identification record, scene photos, and the forensic assessment of the degree of bodily injury, identification number (2014) 91 issued by Bin Gong (Bin) Jian (Injury). These pieces of evidence are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuecheng District in a certain city charges: On the evening of October 19, 2012, at about 9 PM, the defendants Jiang and Cheng, after prior agreement, conspired to go out and rob women walking alone of their money. The defendants Jiang and Cheng rode together on an electric bicycle near the Customs on Shengli Road, in the district city, at places such as Jinle Palace Entertainment City, looking for and following targets, waiting for an opportunity to snatch money from women walking alone. However, because there were many people on the streets, they did not get a chance to act. At about 10 PM on the same night, the two defendants returned to their rental residence and conspired again, planning to use a knife to threaten their target and commit robbery, thus preparing tools for the crime, including a fruit knife, a steel knife, a screwdriver, and pliers. Around 1 AM the next day, the two defendants, carrying the aforementioned tools, looked for targets in multiple locations such as the night stalls in the eastern part of the district city and Changan Overpass, waiting to commit robbery. Until 2 AM, the defendants Jiang and Cheng were apprehended near the intersection of Xinjian Road and Shengli Road at the Power Building, by patrol officers from the public security bureau. The police confiscated the crime tools on the spot, including a steel knife, a fruit knife, a screwdriver, and pliers, one of each, from the two defendants. Upon identification: the steel knife confiscated from defendant Jiang was identified as a controlled knife; the fruit knife confiscated from defendant Cheng was not categorized as a controlled knife. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Jiang and Cheng during the trial, and were corroborated by various evidence, including the testimony of witness Peng, the certificate identifying the controlled knife, the identification record and photographs, the list of seized items, pictures of the recovered crime tools, the account of the apprehension process, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Defendants Xiao and Li drove a certain C××××× semi-trailer truck to carry out transportation business from a city’s surrounding areas to a certain place and back. Starting May 15, 2020, the defendants Xiao and Li concealed the true departure location and used short-distance transit cards to replace long-distance transit cards in order to evade highway tolls. On July 12, 2020, after Xiao and Li once again evaded tolls at the Hujiafang toll station on the highway, they were caught by municipal public security bureau police officers. According to statistics, defendants Xiao and Li evaded tolls 44 times, totaling 57,851 yuan. After the incident, Xiao and Li repaid the evaded tolls amounting to 57,851 yuan. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the prosecution with the following evidence: 1. Transcript of extraction, seizure list; 2. Case registration form, payment details and evasion amount table, repayment toll invoices; 3. Testimony of witness Li; 4. Confessions and defenses of defendants Xiao and Li.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Development Zone of a certain city charged: The victim Qiao, due to a loan, had an economic dispute with others. Wu (handled in a separate case), after failing to recover the debt from Qiao, gathered defendant Lan and Song (handled in a separate case) and others on the afternoon of October 30, 2015. Defendant Lan then gathered defendant Bao and others to a stainless steel market in the southern part of a new district in the original city. They used wooden sticks to smash the Volkswagen Touareg SUV with the license plate SuB××××× parked between buildings 12 and 13 in the market by victim Qiao. According to the appraisal, the cost of repairing the car was 17,898 RMB. On December 2, 2015, defendant Lan was caught by public security authorities in a certain city of a certain province while on his way to surrender himself. On December 24, 2015, defendant Bao was arrested by public security authorities in a certain city of a certain province. Both defendants truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts.", "label": {"Lan": ["Imprisonment"], "Bao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that in November 2016, the defendants, Zhang and Lu, a married couple, due to their need for planting Panax notoginseng, repeatedly went to the \"Po Bei Hou,\" \"Long Shu Liang,\" and \"Da Ma Li Shu\" areas of a village in the Laohuilong village committee of a certain town in a certain city. They used a sickle and a machete to cut down 661 sections of collective forest trees. According to the appraisal by the Yunnan Yunlin Judicial Appraisal Center, the 661 sections of trees felled were considered saplings as their diameters at breast height were less than 5 cm. They were counted as 661 saplings, with the tree species being Cryptomeria, a commonly used timber tree species with no national or provincial key protection status. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants, Zhang and Lu, during the court trial. The evidence includes: one sickle, one machete; documentary evidence: the police registration form, decision to file a case, household registration certificate, certificate of previous convictions, apprehension record, and confiscation list; witness testimonies from Zhang1, Zhang2, Lu, Yang, Xiao, Ma; the statements and defenses of the defendants, Zhang and Lu; judicial appraisal report and notification; on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, etc., all of which are sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: Defendant Xing harbored resentment towards Li Yi for competing with him over the waste recycling business at the Süxian County Lishi Power Plant, and thus intended to take revenge on Li Yi. Around 11 PM on August 12, 2012, Xing gathered defendant Jiang and Liu, Hu, Zhang Jia, Ma, Zhang Yi (all five have been sentenced) and others, drove to a village in Suixi Town, Suixi County, and mistakenly identified victim Li Bing as Li Yi. They entered Li Bing's house by breaking the door. Jiang, Liu, Zhang Jia, Hu, Ma, Zhang Yi, and others used iron rods to damage Li Bing's Hyundai Accent car and injured Li Bing and Li Ding. According to the assessment, Li Bing's injuries were classified as serious, while Li Ding's injuries were classified as minor. Subsequently, Xing, Jiang, and others reached a settlement agreement with victims Li Bing and Li Ding regarding civil compensation. In response to the above accusations, the prosecution provided evidence such as the confessions of the defendants, on-site investigation records, appraisal opinions, and witness testimonies. Accordingly,", "label": {"Xing": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that around 8:00 PM on October 1, 2014, defendants Wang and Hu, along with Zhou and Li (both of whom have been convicted), engaged in a dispute over trivial matters with Dai and others at the entrance of Zhengxing Snack Shop in Xintiandi Plaza, downtown. In a show of force, defendants Wang and Hu, among others, conspired and prepared tools, wearing masks and wielding weapons such as a Guan Yu knife, a dagger, and batons. They pursued and assaulted Dai, Zhang, Wei, and another person named Hou at the elevator entrance on the first floor of Xintiandi Media, resulting in injuries to the victim Hou. According to a forensic examination by the Wuxing District Sub-Bureau Forensic Identification Office of Huzhou Public Security Bureau, Hou's injuries were determined to reach the level of mild injury, second degree. After the incident, the defendants received the victim's forgiveness. \n\nIt was also found that on March 17, 2015, defendants Wang and Hu voluntarily surrendered to the Aishan Police Station. Wang and Hu did not object to these facts during the court hearing, and there is supporting evidence including: personal information records, evidence collection lists, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release after serving sentences, administrative penalty decisions, medical records, audiovisual material explanations, statements of understanding; accounts of the arrest process and situation descriptions provided by investigators in the public security organ; statements from the victim Hou; testimonies from witnesses Dai, Wei, Zhang, and two named Hou and Li; forensic report No. 117 (2014) issued by Wu concerning body injury assessment; on-site inspection records, sketches and photographs, identification records and photographs; video materials; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang, Hu, and co-defendants Zhou and Li, all of which are sufficient for substantiation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On March 17, 2017, at around 20:34, defendants Song and Liang, while shopping at a fruit supermarket on Chang'an Street in a certain city, collided with a friend of the victim Wang. Wang then broke two bottles of beer from the supermarket and used the broken beer bottles to injure Song and Liang. Subsequently, Song and Liang threw Wang to the ground and punched and kicked him. According to the assessment, Wang's bilateral nasal bones and maxillary frontal process fractures were classified as minor injuries of the second degree; his 9th and 10th left ribs fractures were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, Song and Liang were summoned and brought to justice. Song and Liang each compensated Wang for various economic losses totaling 95,000 yuan.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses: Around 1:40 am on October 25, 2019, defendants Chen and Ye were drinking with their friends, including Lin Mouhua, at the 1822 bar in Wanda Plaza, Zengcheng District, a certain city. During this time, Lin Mouhua had a conflict with the victim, He Mou1, and was kicked by He Mou1. After learning about the situation, defendants Chen and Ye found He Mou1, who was resting in the plaza, and assaulted him with their fists and feet. Victim Chen Mou1 was also injured during the intervention. According to the assessment, the injury level of victim He Mou1 was minor injury Level 1, and Chen Mou1 had a minor injury. On December 11, 2019, defendants Chen and Ye were arrested and brought to justice in a certain district of the city. It is considered that defendants Chen and Ye have confessed; with circumstances of admitting guilt and accepting punishment, it is suggested that they be sentenced to one year to one year and six months in prison. Defendants Chen and Ye have no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations and have signed to confirm this, and they raised no objections during the trial. Both defense attorneys claim that the victim bears some responsibility for the occurrence of this case, and the defendants are first-time offenders and occasional offenders, have a good attitude towards confession, admitting guilt and accepting punishment, and hope the court will be lenient in sentencing Chen and Ye.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner charges: At around 10 PM on August 10, 2018, herdsmen Da and Su, among others, from a certain place in a certain Banner, went to a barbecue restaurant operated by someone in a certain area to drink. During this time, defendant Da went to the private room of Tian and others to toast. At the table, Da became dissatisfied with Tian's statement that \"I once took care of your father,\" and the two had an argument and engaged in a verbal and shoving altercation inside the barbecue restaurant. After being separated by Qing and others, Da returned to the barbecue restaurant to continue drinking. Defendant Su dragged Tian outside to the courtyard, pushed him down, and straddled Tian's abdomen, pressing down with his hands and punching Tian's chest several times before returning to the barbecue restaurant. Victim Tian lay on the ground and called the police station. After learning that victim Tian had called the police, defendant Da approached Tian, who was lying on the ground, and kicked and punched him. The day after the incident, Tian was admitted to the hospital for treatment. According to an assessment, the victim Tian suffered a tear to the right pectoralis major muscle, resulting in partial loss of function of the right shoulder joint, and this was classified as minor injury of the first degree. To prove the facts of the case, the public prosecution provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert opinions, examination, inspection, identification, and investigation experiment records, among other evidence.", "label": {"Da": ["Detention"], "Su": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from June 2006 to April 2009, the defendants Guo and Zheng served as patrol officers at the Shiyan Police Station of the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau. They were responsible for patrolling and controlling the security of Baoshi South Road in the district under the jurisdiction of Shiyan Police Station, preventing and managing street crime, assisting police officers in cracking down on street violations and criminal activities, and helping police officers capture criminal suspects. On October 13, 2008, at around 1 PM, defendants Guo and Zheng were patrolling Baoshi South Road. The complainant, Liao Jin, reported to Guo and Zheng near the Shiyan Market that his money had been stolen and requested that they catch the thief. Upon receiving the report, Guo and Zheng went together to the rooftop of the Donghai Building in front of Shiyan Market to look for the suspect involved in the theft (later identified as \"Ami Za\"). After Guo and Zheng reached the rooftop, they found Ami Za hiding in a corner and proceeded to arrest and detain him. During questioning, Ami Za admitted to his recent theft and handed over 8,800 RMB in cash to Guo, requesting Guo to accept the money and release him. After taking the money from Ami Za, Guo and Zheng left together, intentionally leaving Ami Za on the rooftop of the Donghai Building. Later, when the public security authorities pursued the whereabouts of the stolen funds, Guo learned of this and fled his position. On October 28, 2011, defendant Guo surrendered at the Guanlan Police Station and was sent to the Shiyan Police Station, where he compensated the victim with 8,800 RMB. The defendants Guo and Zheng did not object to the above facts during the trial, and they were confirmed by relevant evidence, which is sufficient for establishment.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On November 9, 2020, defendants Cheng and Huang conspired in advance to steal cable wires located in the plant area of Green Eco-Manufacture (Jiangsu) Cobalt Industry Co., Ltd., which belong to Taizhou Zhongzhou Electric Power Installation Engineering Co., Ltd. Later, defendants Cheng and Huang went to a scrap recycling station operated by defendants Zhou and Lu on Shugong Road in a certain town in the city. After discussing with Zhou and Lu, defendants Cheng and Huang carried out the theft, while defendants Zhou and Lu provided an electric tricycle and took charge of purchasing the stolen goods. At around 19:00 on the same day, defendants Cheng and Huang went to the south side of the fence of Green Eco-Manufacture (Jiangsu) Cobalt Industry Co., Ltd. Defendant Huang climbed over the fence to enter the plant area and used scissors to cut and steal cables of model ZC-YJV-0.6/1KV3*240+2*120 and ZC-YJV-0.6/1KV3*120+2*70, while defendant Cheng kept watch outside the fence. They then went to defendants Zhou and Lu, where Cheng, Huang, and Zhou stripped and weighed the stolen cables, and defendants Zhou and Lu purchased the stolen cables for 5040 RMB, later selling them to others for 5280 RMB. According to price assessment, the stolen cables were valued at 6725 RMB. After the incident, defendant Cheng voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his crime; defendants Huang, Zhou, and Lu truthfully confessed their crimes after being apprehended.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that at the end of November 2019, defendants Yu, Ruan, and Lin discussed finding farmland in a town of a certain city to extract sand for profit. They divided responsibilities with Yu in charge of organizing extraction, transportation, and sales, Ruan in charge of providing information and security, and Lin responsible for on-site management, providing technical support, and partial funding. From December 7 to 16, 2019, the three defendants, without obtaining a mining license in accordance with the law, employed excavators, loaders, and trucks under the pretense of land remediation to illegally extract approximately 3,770 tons of Field A from farmland contracted by villagers Dai and relatives (located in a certain village, a certain town, a certain city**), by extracting at night and refilling with soil during the day. During this period, Yu sold about 1,112 tons to Li and Tian, gaining 85,000 RMB. The unsold portion of Field A was used to offset excavator costs, and some was left at a stockpile (located in a certain village, a certain town, a certain city** on Chen Xiaoxiao's farmland). According to valuation by a price appraisal agency, the price of raw ore of Field A left in the stockpile was 64 RMB per ton. Upon investigation, the value of Field A extracted by the three defendants in this case was 278,000 RMB (including 85,000 RMB from the sale, 107,000 RMB from Field A confiscated and auctioned, and 86,000 RMB from Field A used to offset debts and wasted as foundational material at stockpiles). After the crime, defendant Ruan surrendered to the Bailizhou Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau on December 27, 2019. Defendant Lin was captured by the Majadian Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau on the same day. Defendant Yu absconded but later surrendered to the Bailizhou Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau on April 7, 2020. The allegations of the aforementioned criminal facts are substantiated by the prosecution with evidence including photographs of physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ruan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that around 5 PM on March 7, 2014, the defendants Huang and Wen acted in collusion and with a division of labor. They went to the entrance of the Xinning Hotel on Wangcheng Avenue in the suburbs of a certain city. Defendant Wen forcibly removed the electrical wires while defendant Huang kept watch, and they stole a Honda men's two-wheeled motorcycle (frame number: LALPCJ7D2D3088254, engine number: D3050229, appraised value: RMB 5960) parked there by the victim, Li. After the crime, the motorcycle was retrieved and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Wen during the trial. Additionally, the prosecuting authority provided, and this court verified during the trial, supporting evidence, including the victim Li's police report, the vehicle sales invoice, vehicle information inquiry form, appraisal report of the involved item, records of on-site investigation and inspection, schematic diagrams and photographs of the scene, lists of seized and returned items, identification records and photographs in which defendants Huang and Wen identified each other, as well as records and photographs where defendants Huang and Wen pointed out the crime scene, the tools used, and the stolen motorcycle. Further corroborated by explanatory notes, the process of capture, and the defendants' household registration materials, there is sufficient evidence to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Zibo City charges: At around 1 AM on May 29, 2017, near a snack stall on the east side of the entrance to a hospital on Zhanbei Road in a certain district, the victim, Wen, had a verbal altercation and scuffle with the defendant, Tian, over trivial matters. Subsequently, the defendants Tian, Ju, and Pu assaulted Wen, causing injuries. Appraisal determined Wen's injuries to be of second-degree minor injuries. Upon investigation, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Zibo City were true. It was also found that this case was reported by the victim Wen. The defendants Tian, Ju, and Pu all voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts after being brought to justice. During the investigation stage, the defendants Tian, Ju, and Pu compensated the victim Wen for all losses, and all received the victim Wen's understanding. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Tian, Ju, and Pu during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as case explanations and other documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, appraisal opinions, identification records, and defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Ju": ["Imprisonment"], "Pu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that in June 2011, Witness One, a villager from the fourth group of a certain village in Gucheng County Town, undertook the project of paving the road surface for the third group of the village. In mid-July, defendants Gan, Jiang, and Yang approached Witness One, asking him to either withdraw from the project or to jointly undertake the project. Witness One did not agree and continued the construction. Around 8 p.m. on July 19, defendants Jiang, Gan, and Yang went to the construction site of Witness One and used a pickaxe and hammer to smash the cement pool and disrupt the set steel formwork. Several days later, defendants Jiang, Gan, and Yang called Witness One to Yang's house and told him: \"If you want to continue the construction without obstruction, give us each 10,000 yuan.\" Out of fear, Witness One agreed to pay each of them 8,000 yuan, with an upfront payment of 5,000 yuan and the remaining 3,000 yuan to be paid after the completion of the project. Witness One subsequently paid each of defendants Jiang, Gan, and Yang 5,000 yuan in cash. After the completion of the road surfacing on November 20, Yang approached Witness One to demand the remaining cash, at which point Witness One reported the matter to the public security authorities.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from early 2012 to early June 2013, defendants Zhao and Xiao discussed having defendant Xiao provide a \"Fire Butterfly\" slot machine to be placed in defendant Zhao's \"Yangyang\" supermarket located in a certain village of the county for gamblers to use for gambling. They agreed to split the profits equally. On the evening of June 8, 2013, the machine was discovered and seized by the public security authorities during operations. Upon examination, it was confirmed that the seized \"Fire Butterfly\" machine had gambling functions. During the aforementioned period, the machine illegally gained over 12,000 yuan in profits, with each defendant, Zhao and Xiao, receiving over 6,000 yuan. On the evening of June 8, 2013, defendant Zhao was summoned to the scene by public security officers. On the evening of June 27, 2013, defendant Xiao was arrested and brought to justice by public security officers in the central district of a certain city. After the incident, defendant Zhao returned 8,000 yuan to the public security authorities. During the trial, defendant Xiao returned 6,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Xiao during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Huang A and Huang B, recorded during the trial, inspection records, relevant identification records, expert opinion on the electronic gaming facilities, seizure decision documents, inventory lists submitted with the case, photographs, explanatory notes, household registration certificates, and other evidence, sufficient to substantiate these claims.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province charges: On July 27, 2014, at approximately 20:00, the defendants Yang and Gong, after premeditation, went to the vicinity of Jazz Fenghua Residential Area on Hongxing Road in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Gong assisted by riding a motorcycle nearby, while defendant Yang took the opportunity to snatch a gold pendant worth 4,134 yuan and weighing approximately 13 grams from the victim, Wu, when Wu was walking at that location. The loot was later sold at \"Shundang Pawnshop\" in a certain district, fetching 3,120 yuan. After the crime, Defendant Gong's family members returned 3,180 yuan of the stolen money, which has been handed back to the victim. Furthermore, it was discovered that after the crime, the 3,120 yuan returned by \"Shundang Pawnshop\" was collected by the victim, Wu. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Yang and Gong during the court trial. The evidence, including documentary evidence such as household registration proof, arrest process, the criminal judgment No. 62 (2011) of the primary criminal case from the People's Court of Zhongfang County, a release certificate, an administrative punishment decision by the Hecheng Branch of a city's Public Security Bureau, a seizure decision, a list of seized items and documents, a list of returned items and documents, receipts, a letter of understanding, an explanatory note, the testimony of witness Zou, the statement of victim Wu, the confessions and defenses of defendants Yang and Gong, as well as recognition records, extraction records, identification records, on-site investigation records, on-site plan sketches, and photographs, are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On January 27, 2015, at approximately 3:00 PM, the defendant Li was driving a car with license plate number 鄂A×××××, carrying defendants Hu, Wang, as well as Wang A and Li A (both handled in separate cases) near the Luoma Spring Shopping Center in a certain development zone in a certain district of a city. They encountered Tao, who suddenly braked his car with license plate number 鄂A××××× in front of them. Dissatisfied, Li chased Tao and forced him to stop in the courtyard of the management committee of the development zone in the district. Defendant Li instructed defendants Hu, Wang, and others to use pickaxe handles to smash the right rear window, the left front fender, the left roof beam, and other parts of Tao's car with license plate number 鄂A×××××. According to an appraisal, the value of the damaged items was 3,191 RMB. On February 3, 2015, at about 11:00 AM, defendants Li and Hu were arrested by the police while handling household registration at the district police station of a certain city. On March 24, 2015, at approximately 11:00 AM, defendant Wang turned himself in to the public security organs. After the incident, defendants Li, Hu, and Wang compensated Tao with 30,000 RMB and received his forgiveness.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Based on the trial, it was found that the defendants, Jin and Zhang, were friends; neither of the defendants knew the victim, Zhang1. On the evening of August 9, 2020, the defendants Jin and Zhang were drinking at the night market near the No. 9 Middle School in a certain city’s Horqin District. At around 12:30 a.m. the following day, the two defendants went to a noodle restaurant on Ping'an Road in Horqin District to eat. During Zhang's ordering, defendant Jin got into a verbal altercation with the victim Zhang1, who was dining at the same restaurant, due to verbal provocation. Zhang1 struck defendant Jin with a beer bottle, leading to a scuffle. Defendant Zhang joined in the scuffle upon seeing this. The two defendants used beer bottles and wooden stools to assault the victim Zhang1 and the others dining at the same table, Bao and Liu. After the restaurant staff called the police, the public security authorities summoned the two defendants to the scene of the incident. It was diagnosed that the victim Zhang1 had fractures in the 4th to 8th ribs on the left side; Liu had a laceration on the skin of the left hand. An appraisal determined that the victim Zhang1 sustained injuries to the chest and other areas, causing fractures in the 4th to 8th ribs on the left side, which was assessed as minor injury of the second degree. Furthermore, during the litigation process, the relatives of defendants Jin and Zhang reached a reconciliation agreement with the victim Zhang1, in which each defendant's relatives compensated Zhang1 for economic losses of 30,000 RMB, totaling 60,000 RMB, which has been fully paid. The victim Zhang1 expressed understanding toward the two defendants. The two defendants had no objection to the criminal facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations made by the public prosecution authority, nor did they have any objection during the trial proceedings, both signing and acknowledging the agreement. The evidence materials, including the report materials, victim statements, case registration form, decision to file a case, witness testimonies, medical diagnoses, injury photos, forensic appraisal, letter of understanding, receipt, household registration proof, arrest process, and the confessions of the two defendants, sufficiently substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain city's People's Procuratorate charges: Around 9 a.m. on April 3, 2013, defendants Ge and Lu, after prior discussion and under the guise of collecting scrap materials, went to the home of the victim Fu at No. 248, Lingshanwu Village, Yingdianjie Town, a certain city. Lu pretended to negotiate prices with the victim Fu to distract him, while Ge took the opportunity to enter the bedroom and used a screwdriver to pry open a drawer, stealing 30,000 RMB from inside. After the crime, the 30,000 RMB of stolen money was returned to the victim, who forgave them. To prove the above charges, the prosecution submitted to the court the testimony of witness Yang, the arrest record, basic resident information, site photos and diagrams, the letter of forgiveness, receipt, identification records and photos, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Ge and Lu. It is believed that defendants Ge and Lu, with the intent of illegal possession, conspired to secretly steal another's property from their residence, which constitutes a substantial amount, and should therefore be held criminally liable for the crime of x as accomplices. The court is requested to sentence both defendants according to articles x and x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Ge and Lu do not object to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. Defendant Ge requests leniency in sentencing. The defense lawyer, Jiang, submitted that while there is no objection to the criminal facts and charges, defendant Ge has the following mitigating circumstances: 1. Lesser subjective malice and minor social harm; he has always abided by the law. 2. After the incident, his family voluntarily offered restitution and obtained the victim’s forgiveness. 3. He has a good attitude towards admitting guilt and can truthfully confess his criminal behavior. 4. He is a first-time and occasional offender. A request is made for leniency in defendant Ge's sentencing, with consideration for a probation application. After court examination, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was verified as true. The court confirms the facts charged by the prosecution against defendants Ge and Lu for the crime of x.", "label": {"Ge": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that from early April 2013 to May 29, 2013, the defendant Zhang, together with the defendant Yue, hired defendant Li to illegally excavate 10,400.26 tons of iron ore without any mining permits in a river bend west of a village in a certain town of a certain city. All the ore was seized, with a total value of 509,613 RMB. It was further found that defendant Yue voluntarily surrendered to the public security bureau of a certain city on June 3, 2013. The facts stated above were not disputed by the three defendants during the court proceedings. Additionally, the case is supported by evidence including the case registration form from the public security bureau of a certain city, the circumstances of the defendants being brought to justice, the confessions of defendants Zhang, Yue, and Li, the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Song, Chen, Wang Yi, and Ma, on-site photographs, verification from the city's land and resources bureau, a resource assessment report from the First Geological Survey Institute of China Metallurgical Geology Bureau concerning Zhang's mining site in a village of a certain town of a certain province, the asset valuation report related to the case in a certain province, a valuation report on the damage to mineral resources caused by illegal and destructive mining from the land and resources department of a certain province, as well as the household registration certificates of the three defendants, all of which provide sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from November 3 to November 6, 2012, the defendants Sun, Tang, and Hu, with the intent of making a profit, provided equipment at the second floor of \"U1S Board Game Bar\" in Liuhe Tianyu, Pu Yan Street, of this district, for others to gamble using \"Texas Hold'em\" poker. Defendants Sun and Tang, Hu agreed to share profits equally. During this period, they illegally gained more than 9,000 yuan through methods such as rake and receiving tips. After the incident, all three defendants have returned the total illegal earnings. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun, Tang, and Hu during the court trial. There is also testimony from witnesses Liu, Chen, Shen, Zhang, and Xu; various chips, a deck of playing cards, accounting books, gambling funds, gambling equipment and other seized items, as well as inspection records; lists of seized and transferred items; police administrative penalty decision; explanatory notes; the details of the arrest; and household registration certificates and confessions of defendants Sun, Tang, and Hu made at the police station and in court, all supporting evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the evening of September 16, 2015, the defendant Wang kept Li and Yuan in room xx of xx hotel in this city where he was staying, to consume methamphetamine (ice) and methamphetamine tablets (commonly known as \"magu\") by smoking. On the evening of around September 19 of the same year, the defendant Wang kept Li and others in room xx of xx inn in Yinzhou District of this city where he was staying to consume methamphetamine by smoking. On the evening of September 21 of the same year, the defendant Wang kept Li and 2 others in room xx of xx hotel in Yinzhou District of this city where he was staying to consume methamphetamine by smoking. In the early morning of September 23 of the same year, the defendant Wang kept Li in room xx of xx hotel in Yinzhou District of this city where he was staying to consume methamphetamine and methamphetamine tablets by smoking. In the evening of a day in late August 2015, in the evening of a day in early September 2015, in the evening of around September 10, 2015, and in the evening of around September 20, 2015, the defendant Li on four occasions kept Wang at his rented place to consume methamphetamine by smoking. At around 0:00 on October 11, 2015, the police arrested the defendant Li in this city and found a package of methamphetamine (net weight 0.6536 grams) on him. Based on the above facts and circumstances, the public prosecution agency suggests sentencing the defendant Wang to one year in prison and a fine for x crime, and sentencing the defendant Li to eight months in prison and a fine for x crime. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Wang and Li during the trial process, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Hu, Zhu, Mao, and another Zhu, the records and decision of seizure, the list of seized items, photographic materials, temporary detention receipts, hotel guest lists, rental agreements, on-site test reports, household registration certificates, arrest records, criminal judgment, public security administrative punishment decision, explanatory notes, physical and chemical test identification reports, and recognition records, etc., which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: 1. One night in early July 2016, defendants Luo and Xiao allowed Yang, Jiang, Deng, and others to use a homemade \"ice pipe\" to consume methamphetamine in the employee dormitory 301 of Hengsheng Company in Wukeng Village, Longhu Town, Jinjiang City; 2. One night around July 27, 2016, defendants Luo and Xiao again allowed Yang, Jiang, Deng, and others to use a homemade \"ice pipe\" to consume methamphetamine in their dormitory in the same location; 3. One night at the end of August 2016, defendants Luo and Xiao allowed Yang, He, Deng, and others to use a homemade \"ice pipe\" to consume methamphetamine in the same dormitory. On September 8, 2016, defendants Luo and Xiao were apprehended by the public security organs. The defendants Luo and Xiao raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court trial. Evidence supporting the charges includes the apprehension report and case-solving report issued by the public security organs, testimonies of witnesses Xu, Jiang, Deng, Yang, and He, identification records, photos of identified persons, household registration information, a decision document on evidence preservation, inspection records, urine test records, on-site testing reports, administrative punishment decision documents, photo identifications, administrative punishment decision documents, spousal housing registration forms, among others.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the night of October 27, 2012, defendants Liu, Li, and Du collaborated and went to the fields near the wholesale market at Xihe Road, Jinping Street in this city. Taking advantage of the darkness and absence of people, they sawed down and stole ten camphor trees planted by the victim Lin, eight of which were valued at a total of 6,450 RMB, with the remaining two unable to be appraised. After the incident, defendant Liu and Du each compensated the victim Lin with 3,500 RMB, and defendant Li compensated Lin with 3,000 RMB, each receiving Lin's forgiveness. Furthermore, it was found that defendants Li and Du were arrested by police on April 1 and April 16, 2015, respectively. Defendant Du assisted the police in arresting defendant Liu on the day he was brought in. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Liu, Li, and Du during the trial of this case and were corroborated by evidence such as the statement of victim Lin, identification records, on-site inspection records, price appraisal report, seizure warrant and list of items returned, photographs, compensation agreement, letter of forgiveness, statement of circumstances, case history, and population information forms, sufficient to establish the facts. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution suggested sentencing defendant Liu to six to eight months imprisonment with probation, and a fine; it suggested sentencing defendants Li and Du to four to six months of detention with probation, and a fine.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Du": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From 2009 to February 17, 2012, the defendant Li sold the \"One Kidney Gold\" product multiple times in his pharmacies \"Ningbo Zhenhai Spring Pharmacy\" and \"Ningbo Zhenhai Yongxin Pharmacy,\" which he purchased from the defendant Zhu. On February 17, 2012, the aforementioned products were ordered to be seized by the Ningbo Zhenhai District Food and Drug Administration. According to the inspection results from the Zhejiang Provincial Institute for Food and Drug Control, 76 capsules of the \"One Kidney Gold\" seized from the defendant were determined to be counterfeit drugs. During the court hearing, defendants Zhu and Li did not dispute these facts. These facts are supported by documentary evidence, including household registration certificates of defendants Zhu and Li, records of their capture, payment receipts, delivery notes, certificates of release upon completion of sentence, explanatory notes, business licenses, inventory lists of seized items, seizure decision documents, approvals, photographs, inspection reports, on-site inspection records, and investigation records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 11 PM on July 15, 2016, the defendants Xu and Wang drove under the influence of alcohol to a location 100 meters west of a certain residential area in a district. They had a dispute with a taxi cab over a driving issue. Subsequently, the defendants Xu and Wang assaulted the taxi driver, Zhang1, and his relative, Zhang2. After the victim Zhang1 called the \"110\" command center of the district's Public Security Bureau, officers from the Xinle police station responded. However, the defendants Xu and Wang, ignoring the officers' advice, continued to create trouble under the influence of alcohol, verbally abusing and assaulting officer Wang2. According to the forensic examination by the district's Public Security Bureau, the injuries sustained by Zhang1 and Wang2 were identified as minor injuries. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, the relatives of the defendant Xu commissioned his lawyer to compensate the victims Wang2 and Zhang1 with 20,000 yuan each for their economic losses. The relatives of the defendant Wang commissioned his lawyer to compensate the victim Wang2 with 15,000 yuan and the victim Zhang1 with 20,000 yuan for their economic losses. The victims Wang2 and Zhang1 provided written statements of understanding and forgiveness for the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Wang during the court trial. Additionally, they were supported by the testimonies of the victims Wang2 and Zhang1, the testimonies of witnesses Gao, Zhang2, WangA, Zhang3, and Wang3, identification records, photographs, forensic reports, settlement agreements, receipts, statements of understanding, and the defendants' household registration documents. These pieces of evidence are sufficient for the determination of the case.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 19:00 on May 8, 2013, the defendants Shao, Xu, together with Huang (handled in another case), planned to commit theft behind a hospital on a certain street in the Longhua New District of Bao’an, a city. They carried tools prepared by Huang, such as pliers, and walked towards Xintian Community to look for an opportunity to commit the crime. The defendants Shao, Xu, and Huang A arrived at Shao's residence in Niueoling, Xintian Community, below a rental apartment, and discovered a Samsung mobile phone store. Huang suggested stealing phones from this store, after which the three went to Shao's residence to discuss the plan. Around 2:00 the next morning, defendants Shao, Xu, and Huang arrived at the Samsung mobile phone store belonging to the victim, Fang, and used tools such as pliers to pry open the rear window. Shao and Huang climbed into the store and stole 28 mobile phones including Apple 4S, Samsung, Nokia, Daxian, among others, handing them to Xu outside the store who was responsible for keeping watch and assisting. Additionally, Huang stole a Samsung I9300 phone and a Nokia headset, concealing them on his person. After succeeding, the three returned to Shao's residence. Feeling remorseful, Shao and Xu decided to return the phones to the store. After discussion, they decided each person would keep one phone, and Xu would return the remaining 25 phones inside the store by placing them on the counter. That afternoon, defendant Shao sold a leftover generic brand phone for 90 yuan. That evening, upon learning that the police were investigating the case, Shao and Xu voluntarily surrendered to the police, and Xu handed over the stolen Apple 4S phone to the police. Except for five phones whose value could not be assessed, the identified stolen goods were valued at a total of 12,319 yuan. The retrieved 26 phones were returned to the victim. The above facts were not contested by defendants Shao and Xu during the trial, and evidence verified during the trial is sufficient to support this conclusion.", "label": {"Shao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: Around 1 a.m. on March 9, 2013, defendants Deng and Wei, after premeditating, robbed the victim, Ni, on the east side of the non-motorized lane of Bako Line, diagonally opposite the Dangshan Gas Station in Xinyuan Village, ** District, Hangzhou City. Using methods such as choking and frisking, they caused minor injuries to the victim, Ni. Due to the victim's loud cries for help and strong resistance, they fled before they could frisk him. During the escape, defendant Wei, when intercepted and questioned by patrolling officers due to his suspicious behavior, voluntarily confessed to the robbery committed in collusion with defendant Deng. Defendant Deng, during questioning by patrol officers, failed to truthfully confess. These facts were undisputed by defendants Deng and Wei during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Ni's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang Alpha, Wang Beta, Ni Alpha, Lei Certain, identification records, on-site investigation records, injury assessment report, photos of the victim's clothing, interrogation video, details of the incident, and defendants Deng and Wei's household registration certificates, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On August 23, 2014, the defendants Bi and Huang (who were in a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship) jointly rented garage xx of building xx in Feihong New Village, Zhonghe Street, a certain district in a certain city, and during their stay, repeatedly allowed others to consume methamphetamine in this temporary residence. Specifically: One evening in early November 2014, defendant Bi allowed Li to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. At around 11 p.m. on the night of November 18 or 19, 2014, defendant Bi allowed Gou, \"Aguo,\" and \"Heige\" to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. At around 6 p.m. on November 22, 2014, defendants Bi and Huang allowed Gou, \"Aguo,\" and \"Heige\" to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. At around 11 p.m. on November 30, 2014, defendants Bi and Huang allowed Gou and \"Heige\" to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. One evening in late November 2014, defendant Bi allowed Li to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. Furthermore, during their stay in this temporary residence, defendant Huang alone or together with Bi repeatedly allowed Gou to consume methamphetamine in the temporary residence. On December 2, 2014, defendants Bi and Huang were arrested by the police at garage xx of building xx in Feihong New Village, Zhonghe Street, a certain district in a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Bi and Huang during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Gou, and Tang, inspection records, site identification records and photos, on-site test reports, the rental contract, a copy of Huang's identification card, the administrative punishment decision, details of the arrest, investigation reports, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Bi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that on June 29, 2015, at approximately 1 a.m., at the proposal of defendant Sun, defendants Sun and Er conspired to commit theft. In the Jincheng Garden of the Weihai Torch Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone, defendant Er acted as a lookout outside while defendant Sun entered the second floor of the victim Zhang's home using the method of climbing the building, stealing a LV women's handbag owned by Zhang, which contained 567 RMB, 100 HKD, 5 USD, a bank card, an ID card, and other items. After the theft was completed, the two defendants were apprehended by patrolling police officers, and the stolen items were seized from defendant Er. The two defendants confessed to the criminal act of theft without dispute. After the incident, the stolen items were returned to the victim.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Er": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou City charges: On March 9, 2016, the defendant Fang, due to a debt dispute with the victim Zhou Mouyi, colluded with defendants Ge and Liu to threaten and intimidate the victim verbally and illegally detained the victim until the afternoon of March 21, 2016. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the victim's statement, testimonies of relevant witnesses, and the defendants’ confessions and defenses. It is thus considered that the actions of defendants Fang, Ge, and Liu constitute the crime of x. Defendant Ge and Liu are considered accomplices, and defendant Liu is considered to have voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, which should be taken into account according to the law. Defendants Fang, Ge, and Liu have no objection to the criminal facts and charges in the indictment and expressed a willingness to plead guilty. The defense lawyer Liu Mou A argued that defendant Fang committed the crime to collect a debt from the victim, pleaded guilty in court voluntarily, and showed remorse, suggesting the court impose a lighter penalty and consider probation. Defense lawyer Li Moumou argued that defendant Ge is an accomplice, pleaded guilty in court voluntarily, and showed remorse, suggesting the court impose a lighter penalty and consider probation. Upon examination, it was found that on March 9, 2016, defendant Fang, due to a debt dispute with victim Zhou Mouyi, colluded with defendants Ge and Liu to bring the victim Zhou Mouyi from a certain city in a certain province to this city. They threatened and intimidated the victim Zhou Mouyi verbally and closely monitored the victim in various districts of this city. Defendant Fang closely monitored the victim Zhou Mouyi around the clock, and arranged for defendants Ge and Liu to assist with the monitoring during the daytime. On the afternoon of March 21, 2016, the victim Zhou Mouyi was rescued by the public security authorities. After the incident, defendant Liu surrendered to the authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Fang, Ge, and Liu during the trial, and are confirmed by the victim Zhou Mouyi's statement, testimonies of witnesses Zhou Moujia, Xiao Mou, and others, the apprehension process, IOUs, identification records, photos, and video materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charges: From March 2019 to August 13, 2019, defendants Shen and Chai and others collaborated at the Mingyu Foot Massage Parlor in Yuhang District, a certain city, to harbor prostitutes Tang and Guo and others for prostitution, illegally profiting over 500,000 RMB. During this period, defendant Lin, knowing that prostitution was taking place in the foot massage parlor, still assisted Lin 1 in management, bringing in customers, and arranging technicians for services, involving an amount over 500,000 RMB. Defendant Ou, starting work at the Mingyu Foot Massage Parlor at the end of May 2019, knowing that prostitution was occurring in the parlor, still assisted with cashier duties and compiling daily service logs, involving an amount over 300,000 RMB. The evidence provided for the charges includes documentary evidence; witness testimonies; inspection records, examination records, identification records; video CDs; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner in a certain area charges: On May 30, 2019, defendants Zhang and Wu drove a pickup truck with license plate ××× to a pastoral area to purchase sheep. As they did not receive any sheep and lost a truck's worth of fuel, they decided to steal cattle and sheep to compensate for their loss. Defendants Zhang and Wu drove the pickup truck with license plate ××× near the grazing point of Wu's household in a certain town within a certain Banner of a certain area. The two defendants used a rope to lasso a calf from Wu's household, loaded it onto the pickup truck, and continued driving south. When they reached near Wang A's grazing point at the 75-kilometer mark of the He'e highway, the defendants manually loaded a calf lying on the roadside into the pickup truck. The two defendants took the two stolen calves to Zhang's grazing point. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain Banner in a certain area, the calf from Wu's household was valued at 800 RMB, while the calf from Wang's household was valued at 7,000 RMB. On July 18, 2019, defendants Zhang and Wu compensated the victim Wang with 18,000 RMB and the victim Wu with 15,000 RMB. On August 30, 2019, defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the authorities. On September 3, 2019, defendant Wu voluntarily surrendered to the authorities. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Wu during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence such as the police response registration form, case registration form, decision to file a case, household registration information, list of seized items, receipts, letter of understanding, price certification report, witness testimonies, statements from victims, and confessions from the defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charged that at around 0:00 on February 27, 2014, the defendants Liang and Wei, in collaboration with Ban A and Ban B (both of whom have been sentenced), stole a blue and white two-wheeled moped belonging to the victim, Xiang, which was parked in front of the Yiku Internet Café on Donggang Road, Pingma Town, in the said county. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of the respective county, the stolen moped was valued at 3,102 yuan. The prosecution presented relevant evidence to the court to substantiate the alleged criminal facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: On February 28, 2019, the People's Government of a certain county issued a notice on implementing a fishing ban period system, stipulating that the fishing ban period in the Duhe River Basin within the county is from 0:00 on March 1 to 24:00 on June 30 each year. At about 13:00 on May 19, 2020, the defendants Xiao and Liu used electrical fishing equipment to catch fish in the Duhe River Basin (Gongzuo section, Liulin Township, a certain county). The defendant Xiao operated the fishing equipment, while the defendant Liu carried a plastic bucket to collect the fish caught. By 14:00 on the same day, they were caught on the spot by the fishery law enforcement officers of the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of the county, who then confiscated one inverter (model: 89000H, power: 1290A), one lithium battery (power: 120AH), a set of electric nets, and the catch (214 fish of various species, weighing 0.6 kg). After the incident, the defendants Liu and Xiao each paid a compensation fee of 2500 yuan to the county's Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau for the destruction of ecological resources. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Xiao during the trial, and were corroborated by the following evidence presented and cross-examined during the trial and confirmed by this court: 1. Physical evidence photos: inverter, electric net, catch, etc.; 2. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificate, notice from the People's Government of a certain county; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Li and Deng; 4. Inspection and examination records; 5. Audio-visual materials; 6. Confessions of the defendants Liu and Xiao.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Xiao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial has concluded. The prosecution alleges that on April 27, 2013, at approximately 21:00, the victims Zhen, Chen, Luo, and Liu Huahua were playing gambling machines inside the \"Yijia Game Hall\" on Wenxuequan Road, Jingling Office, Tianmen City. The operator of the game hall, Zhao Mouqun, suspected the four victims of cheating and called the defendant, Chen, to handle the situation. Defendant Chen then invited defendant Gan and others to the scene, where they threatened and assaulted the four victims with a knife, forcing them to hand over 9,600 yuan. Subsequently, defendant Chen demanded an additional 10,000 yuan from each victim. Victim Luo led defendants Chen and Gan to the Construction Bank across from the Zhongbai Warehouse on Donghu Road, Jingling Office, Tianmen City, withdrew 4,000 yuan from his bank card, and handed it over to defendant Chen. It was further discovered that on April 28, 2013, after being summoned by phone by officers from the Jingling Police Station of the Tianmen Public Security Bureau, defendant Chen voluntarily went to the police station and truthfully confessed to the robbery committed with others, and returned the illegal proceeds of 13,600 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Chen and Gan during the trial and were corroborated by evidence including household registration certificates, discovery and arrest records from the Tianmen Public Security Bureau, the transaction detail statement of the Chinese Agricultural Bank Jinsui debit card, receipts for temporarily withheld goods in a certain province, testimonies of witnesses Zhao Mouqun, Jin Mouhong, Wang Mou, and statements of victims Zhen, Chen, Luo, and Liu Huahua. Defense attorney Xu Moumou argued that defendant Chen showed signs of voluntary surrender, had a good attitude towards admitting guilt, and actively returned the stolen money. Defense attorney Xie Moumou argued that defendant Gan was an accessory to the crime, truthfully confessed his criminal actions after being apprehended, and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court.", "label": {"Gan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that from late April to early May 2015, at around 16:00 on one of those days, the defendants Mao, Chen, and Deng, acting together, used electric fishing tools purchased online to catch several carp and crucian carp in a section of the Dongping River about 200 meters west of the Shiwanzuo Bridge on Chanshi Avenue in a certain district of a certain city. On May 12th of the same year, around 16:00, the defendants Mao, Chen, and Deng again went to the aforementioned location and used electric fishing tools to catch a total of six fish, including carp and crucian carp, and were subsequently caught red-handed by the police. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Mao, Chen, and Deng during the court hearings. The evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts, includes the arrest process, the seizure record, the list of seized items, the list of handed-over items, testimonials, on-site photographs, household registration certifications, prohibited fishing zone maps, video materials with explanations, and the defendants' statements and identification records during the investigation phase.", "label": {"Mao": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"], "Deng": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on June 28, 2015, at 11:00 am, defendants Ceng and Chen, along with Liu (handled in a separate case), rode a motorcycle to the front of Aier Eye Hospital on Jiefang Road. Liu acted as a lookout while defendants Ceng and Liu A used bolt cutters to break the lock and steal a Ling Shi-brand electric bicycle (valued at 2,760 RMB) that victim Deng had parked in front of Aier Eye Hospital. On the same day at 12:00 pm, defendants Ceng, Chen, and Liu (handled in a separate case) rode a motorcycle to the passageway below Longsheng Taekwondo Gym on Taoyuan West Road. Liu acted as a lookout while defendants Ceng and Liu used bolt cutters to break the lock and steal a Guihuo-brand electric bicycle (valued at 2,490 RMB) that victim Liu had parked in the passageway. During the court hearing, defendants Ceng and Chen raised no objections to the above facts. Evidence includes victim Deng and Liu's report records and statements, appraisal opinions numbered 0310 and 0382 of 2015, and notices of appraisal opinions; identification records; copies of receipts for the purchase of the stolen electric bicycles; photographs of the crime scenes; video screenshots from the crime scenes; a report of the apprehension process by the public security authorities; synchronized audio and video recordings; the criminal judgments numbered 37 from 2007, 63 from 2011, and 121 from 2010, as well as the confessions and identifications of defendants Ceng and Chen, etc. These pieces of evidence are clear and sufficient to affirm the facts.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that around midnight on July 1, 2016, defendants Li and Zhang went to a location west of a certain town in a certain county and placed sand inside the engine of a motor grader owned by the victim, Chen C. This act damaged the engine, forcing Chen C to halt road construction for six days, severely affecting the construction progress. According to an appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain county, the total value of the damaged parts of the grader's engine amounted to RMB 12,885. On July 9, 2016, Li turned himself in at the Zhangguotun Police Station of a certain county's Public Security Bureau. After the incident, Li and Zhang compensated Chen C with a total of RMB 30,000 for repair and lost work time, for which Chen C expressed forgiveness and requested leniency for the defendants. During the court proceedings, defendants Li and Zhang did not object to the stated facts. Additionally, evidence includes the defendants' confessions during the investigation phase, Zhang's site identification records and photos, testimonies from witnesses Chen B and Liu B, statements from the victim Chen C, Price Certification Report No. 056 (2016) from the county's Price Certification Center, police reports and documentation from the county's Public Security Bureau, including the register of received reports, case registration forms, seizure decision, inventory of seized items and photos, inventory of returned items, receipt of evidence materials list and the materials themselves, site diagrams and maps, photos and videos of the scene and evidence, video screenshots and production notes, and a letter of forgiveness; all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that during the period from September 28 to 30, 2019, defendants Zhou and Zhang, along with others, colluded and cooperated with the victim Wang while playing mahjong in the game rooms of Friendship Nanyuan Community and Longyunshedu Community in a certain district. By cheating, they defrauded Wang of 15,840 RMB. It was further found that on October 15, 2019, defendants Zhou and Zhang were summoned to the case by investigators from the Hailar Branch of the Hulunbuir Public Security Bureau. After the incident, the defendants' families fully returned the stolen funds and obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Zhang during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence in the case, including police dispatch registration forms, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decisions, the defendants' household registration documents, process documentation of their apprehension, identification records, WeChat transfer records, administrative penalty decisions, Wang's statement, the defendants' confessions at the public security organ, and discs.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it has been found that defendant Xu, along with others, conspired in late March 2015 to rent the second floor of a house at Nos. 1-3, Building 60, Wansongyuan Community, Jianghan District, this city, which was leased by defendant Yao. They used computer networks to register an account on a gambling website named \"Sunshine Online\" and repeatedly organized social individuals to use the provided registered account and login password to place cash bets on the \"baccarat\" game on the gambling site, from which they derived profits by skimming. Defendant Yao, knowing that defendant Xu was engaged in the criminal activity of setting up a casino, not only provided the aforementioned venue but also lent defendant Xu 10,000 RMB in cash to purchase specialized gambling equipment. On May 13 of the same year, at around 22:00, the police, acting on a tip-off, went to the above location and arrested defendant Xu on the spot, capturing two individuals involved in gambling. They seized gambling equipment including one computer host, one LCD TV, a box of chips, and confiscated a total of 18,000 RMB in gambling funds. Subsequently, the police also arrested defendant Yao. During the trial, defendant Yao returned 9,000 RMB of his illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court trial and are corroborated by evidence such as on-site photos and photos of physical evidence, police arrest and investigation reports, statements of circumstances about coming to court, basic information on the resident population, criminal judgment and administrative punishment decision documents, house lease contract and proof, inventory of seized and recovered items, witness testimonies from Wang, Huang, Liu, Liu A, Ren, and Yao, identification records, electronic data discs, and examination reports, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the evening of July 21, 2014, Mao (currently at large) got into a scuffle with Feng, Liu, and others after a collision while roller skating at the Beibei Amusement Park in the town of Pucheng. Dissatisfied with the incident, Mao repeatedly went to the amusement park to wait for Liu and others to seek revenge at the right moment. Around 8 PM on July 27, 2014, after spotting Feng, Liu, and others at the Beibei Amusement Park, Mao asked the defendants Jiang and Ye to join him in retaliation. Liu and others, noticing this, left on their bikes. Encouraged by Mao, defendants Jiang and Ye, along with Mao, chased after them on a moped. The two groups dismounted near the pedestrian walkway of Fang Zhimin Square in the town center. Defendants Jiang and Ye got off their moped and chased Wei B and Wei A with belts, while Mao attacked Liu with a kitchen knife, slicing his left abdomen. As Liu fled down some stairs, he fell onto the walkway, where defendants Jiang and Ye kicked him and then whipped him with belts. Mao approached again and slashed Liu three times in the head with the kitchen knife. After committing the crime, defendants Jiang, Ye, and Mao fled the scene on the moped. According to the appraisal by the Nanping Public Security Bureau's Forensic Evidence Department, Liu's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, defendant Jiang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and compensated the victim 1,000 yuan for medical expenses. Defendant Ye compensated the victim 11,000 yuan for medical expenses and other economic losses, obtaining the victim's understanding. During the trial, defendants Jiang and Ye raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by household registration documents, the process of capture, receipts, letters of understanding, testimonies of seven witnesses including Wei A, Wei B, and Feng, the victim Liu's statements, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Jiang and Ye. Additionally, the evidence from the Pucheng County Public Security Bureau's on-site investigation records, identification photos, site map, and identification transcripts are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention"], "Ye": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on October 31, 2015, Yang and Wu (both handled in separate cases) and others sought to monopolize the water celery business in the Zhougudui wholesale market of a certain town in the Yaohai District. They planned to drive out suppliers from another city who were conducting similar business in the market through instigating incidents. On November 2, around 7 PM, Yang and Wu invited defendants Zhang, Wang, and Song, Miao (both handled in separate cases) to dine at Feng’ao Hotel in a certain town in the Yaohai District. During the meal, Yang suggested finding a \"haeho\" (referring to a person with a long-term severe illness) to cause trouble for the stall owners from a certain city. Zhang and others agreed. Subsequently, Yang and Zhang contacted defendant Zhou (who has liver disease) by phone, instructing him to cause trouble with a promise of a daily benefit of 1000 RMB, to which Zhou agreed. That evening, Yang and Zhang drove Zhou from the Government Affairs District to Zhougudui market and instructed him to cause trouble at the stalls of city suppliers Hou and Zeng. Zhou maliciously obstructed their normal business by claiming he was beaten by Zeng in a certain city, leading Zeng to report to the police, and the situation was pacified by the local station. Around 10 PM, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Zhou, Song, Miao, and others had a meal at a lamb skewer restaurant on Heyu Road. After the meal, Yang again instructed Zhou to cause trouble, leading Zeng and others to call the police once more. The police took both parties for processing. Following this, Yang, Zhang, and others took one vehicle, while Wang, Wu, Song, Miao, and others took another to the entrance of the Daxing Police Station on Yuxi Road, intending to teach the city stall owners Hou and Zeng a lesson. At about 3 AM the next day, when Hou and Zeng were released from the police station, Wang, Wu, Song, Miao, and others chased and beat them with wooden sticks, injuring Hou in multiple areas. Forensic assessm", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region has charged that on the afternoon of February 13, 2019, defendants Si and Nao encountered defendants Lang, Zhan, Zha, and others on the road from a certain temple to a certain town. Due to prior conflicts between the two parties, a confrontation ensued, and during the fight, all five defendants were injured. Subsequent forensic evaluations by the Qinghai Red Cross Hospital forensic appraisal office determined that defendant Lang and defendant Zha sustained injuries classified as minor injuries level 1, while defendant Zhan’s injuries were classified as minor injuries level 2. The Qinghai Kunlun Forensic Center determined that defendant Si sustained injuries classified as minor injuries level 1, and defendant Nao sustained injuries classified as slight injuries. In support of the aforementioned charges, the prosecution has submitted to this court evidence including the incident report, case registration form, decision to file a case, personnel information form, appraisal report, injury photographs, physical evidence, defendants' confessions and defenses, on-site inspection record, and identification and recognition records.", "label": {"Zha": ["Imprisonment"], "Lang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhan": ["Imprisonment"], "Nao": ["Imprisonment"], "Si": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that one day in October 2012, the defendant Kang, through the introduction of the defendant Xu, purchased a yellow Hyundai Reina sedan from Li A (deceased) from a certain village in a certain county for 21,000 yuan. Upon investigation, it was found that the car was stolen, valued at 72,422 yuan. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above charges, believing that the defendants Kang and Xu's actions violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting x crime, and requested the court to impose a penalty according to the law. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by several pieces of evidence including the victim Li's statement, the criminal case acceptance form, the price certification conclusion report from the Price Certification Center of Shenzhou City, the detention and return list from the Shenzhou City Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that beginning in February 2014, defendants Chen and Lin, without obtaining the necessary medical practice licenses, used the name cs577577 on WeChat to sell drugs C Certain (Inj) and LUTHIONE (Inj) and provide injection services to unspecified individuals at Room F1601, EAC International Apartments, Euromate Center, Jiaogong Road, a certain district of this city. Among them, defendant Chen was responsible for sourcing the drugs and providing medical procedures, while defendant Lin provided the operating venue and assisted in financial transactions through bank accounts and Alipay accounts. By May 15, 2014, the district health bureau investigated Room F1601, EAC International Apartments, Jiaogong Road, and seized on-site 3 boxes of C Certain (Inj) (10 vials per box), 3 boxes of LUTHIONE (Inj) (10 vials per box), Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection, Gentamicin Sulfate Injection, and several surgical instruments. According to the city's Food and Drug Administration, the C Certain (Inj) and LUTHIONE (Inj) seized on site were both counterfeit drugs (treated as counterfeit drugs). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Lin during the trial process, and were substantiated by the district's Health and Family Planning Bureau certification, evidence collection notices, evidence collection logs, Alipay account information, materials transferred by the health bureau, seizure decisions, seizure records, and photographs, criminal record inquiries, search warrants, search records and photographs, evidence preservation decisions, statements of circumstances, details of arrest and case development, household registration documents, and letters and opinions issued by the city's Food and Drug Administration identifying the nature of the products, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in December 2016, the defendants Wang and Chen drove a silver-gray Wuling van and used homemade cages, wire, and other tools to secretly steal a black and white dog from the home of the victim Yan in a village of a certain town in a certain county, and a black dog from the victim Gao's home. They further secretly stole a yellow dog from the home of the victim Chen in a village of a certain township in a certain county. Additionally, they stole a yellow dog from the victim Wang2's home and a black dog from the victim Wang1's home in a village of a certain township of a certain city.\n\nThe defendants Wang and Chen did not object to the facts of the crime charged. The defense argued that they had no objection to the charge. Defendant Chen turned himself in after the crime and truthfully confessed to his criminal activities. Since defendant Chen was a first-time offender and played a secondary role in this case, with lesser subjective malice and social harm, it was suggested that the defendant be given a mitigated punishment.\n\nThe court investigation confirmed that in December 2016, the defendants Wang and Chen drove a silver-gray Wuling van and used homemade cages, wire, and other tools to secretly steal a black and white dog from the home of the victim Yan in a village of a certain town in a certain county, and a black dog from the victim Gao's home. They further secretly stole a yellow dog from the home of the victim Chen in a village of a certain township in a certain county. Additionally, they stole a yellow dog from the victim Wang2's home and a black dog from the victim Wang1's home in a village of a certain township of a certain city.\n\nIt was additionally found that defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs on January 20, 2017, and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime. The evidence supporting these facts includes the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Chen, the statements of the victims Gao, Yan, Chen, Wang2, and Wang1, six identification transcripts, seizure certificates, lists and photos of seized items and documents, the price determination conclusion from the Price Certification Center, the apprehension process, the process of coming to terms, the explanation from a public security bureau in a certain county, the on-site identification photos, and the household registration proof of the two defendants.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Fuxing District, a certain city, accused that on August 25, 2014, at about 11 PM, the defendants Feng, He, and Cheng had an altercation with the victim An (male, 28 years old) and others when Feng was riding an electric bicycle to a certain city’s Fuxing District, near Sunshine Supermarket on Qianjin Street, south of Lao Si Barbecue shop. After leaving, Feng gathered He, Cheng, and others to return to the location, where the three defendants assaulted An, causing injuries to An’s head and face. The injuries to An were identified as minor injuries of the second degree by forensic examination. On December 2, 2014, Feng turned himself in to the public security authorities, and on December 10 of the same year, Cheng and He also turned themselves in. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Feng, He, and Cheng during the trial, and are corroborated by the evidence including: the testimony from Pengjiazai Police Station of the Fuxing District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city proving the three defendants came to the authorities; the statement of the victim An; the testimonies of witnesses Guo, Lin, Han, and Cao; the confessions of the defendants Feng, He, and Cheng at the public security authorities and the identification records pointing out the crime scene; the forensic medical opinion on human injury degree issued by the Physical Evidence Identification Center of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; the on-site investigation record, scene diagram, and photos made by Pengjiazai Police Station of the Fuxing District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; the minor injury case settlement agreement reached by the three defendants with the victim An, and the receipt of compensation and letter of understanding issued by An, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that defendants Chen and Zhang harbored Chuan and Deng for prostitution at Chen's bathhouse located at 57 Fanhua Road, Baihe Town, Tiantai County. On May 9, 2014, when Deng was engaged in prostitution with Wang, and Chuan with Mei, in a room on the third floor of Chen's bathhouse, they were caught by the public security authorities on the spot. On the same day, May 9, 2014, both defendants voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. Regarding the aforementioned facts, neither defendant Chen nor Zhang raised any objections during the court proceedings. The facts are verified by the statements of the two defendants included in the file, the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Chuan, Deng, and Mei, a copy of the individual business license, the inspection record, the identification record, the administrative penalty decision, the explanation of previous offenses, the account of apprehension, the household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Hanting District in a certain city charged: On the evening of August 4, 2014, defendants Guo, Wang, and Li went to the warehouse in the packaging workshop of Weifang Yaxing Chemical Company, Lushi No. 2 Company, and stole 24 bags of chlorinated polyethylene, valued at 7,200 yuan.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On the evening of April 1, 2015, defendants A and Niu stole three BeiYinEr brand baby clothes, twelve KuBiTong brand baby bibs, and four KuBiTong brand baby hats, with a total value of 320 RMB, from the Yingzhidao children's clothing store on Jiangyang Road, Baiguan Street, in a certain district of a certain city by stealth. 2. One day at the end of March 2015, defendants A and Niu stole two Balabala brand baby clothes, with a total value of 185 RMB, from the Balabala children's clothing store on Yangguang Road, Baiguan Street, in a certain district of a certain city by stealth. 3. One day at the end of March 2015, defendants A and Niu stole one Nick+Beibei brand baby pants, valued at 23 RMB, from the Mami Baobao children's clothing store on Jiangyang Road, Baiguan Street, in a certain district of a certain city by stealth. 4. One day at the end of March 2015, defendants A and Niu stole one BeiYinEr brand baby clothing, valued at 56 RMB, from the Yingzhidao children's clothing store on Jiangyang Road, Baiguan Street, in a certain district of a certain city by stealth. After the incident, the public security organs returned the three seized clothes, four hats, and twelve bibs to the victim, Zhang. The above facts, which defendants A and Niu did not dispute during the trial, are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants A and Niu, the statements of victims Zhang, Ma, and Yuan, the testimony of witness Gao, identification records and photos, the seizure decision, return list and photos, surveillance video, purchase lists, appraisal opinions, capture process and household registration certificates, and are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"A": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. Around 3 a.m. on December 23, 2014, defendants Ding and Yang sneaked into Hongyuan Community in a certain city and smashed the glass of the car belonging to the victim Gao, which had the license plate number New GA78**. They stole a handbag from inside the car, which contained a wallet and a pair of glasses, along with 600 yuan in cash. The stolen items were valued at 1,975 yuan, with a total loss amounting to 2,575 yuan. 2. Around 3 a.m. on December 23, 2014, defendants Ding and Yang sneaked into the Garden Street Phase I compound in a certain city and smashed the glass of the Hyundai Elantra belonging to the victim Wang, which had the license plate number G189**. They intended to steal from the car but found no items or cash inside.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused the defendants Wei and Zhong. They saw the victim Luo's information about selling an off-road motorcycle on the \"Longcheng Locomotive\" website. After plotting together, at around 4 PM on June 29, 2013, defendant Zhong drove a certain Haihuapu brand car with license plate number Gui M××××× to take defendant Wei to meet victim Luo at the gate of the Second Middle School in Chang'an Town, Rong'an County, and proposed to test drive. While defendant Wei was test driving at the sports square in Rong'an County, he quickly drove away the Suzuki RMZ250 off-road motorcycle belonging to victim Luo. Afterwards, defendant Zhong was responsible for selling the stolen goods and received 6,800 yuan. According to the appraisal by the Rong'an County Price Certification Center, the stolen off-road motorcycle of victim Luo was valued at 11,400 yuan. On December 10, 2013, defendants Wei and Zhong were arrested in a certain town of a certain county in Rongshui. It was also found that the families of defendants Wei and Zhong had compensated victim Luo for his economic loss with 17,000 yuan and obtained the victim's understanding. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Zhong during the trial, and are substantiated by the testimony of victim Luo, decision of case filing, price appraisal conclusion, notification of appraisal opinion, mobile phone call records, recognition record, arrest process, household registration proof, receipt, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged, and this court has determined after trial, that the defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong were all members of a pyramid scheme organization. On August 5, 2016, the victim, Zheng, was deceived into being taken to a pyramid scheme hideout in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao in a certain city. Starting from 9 p.m. on August 6, in order to force Zheng to join the pyramid scheme, defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong detained Zheng at this location by closely following him and strictly monitoring him. Until around 7 p.m. on August 22, Zheng escaped while attending a class and reported to the police. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong during the court hearing, and were confirmed by their confessions, the victim Zheng's statement and identification records, the testimony of witness Xie, photographs from the scene, and other evidence. After cross-examination during the trial, the defendants did not contest these facts, which this court confirms. It was also determined that around 7 p.m. on August 22, 2016, the Yanshun Road Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city received a report from the victim Zheng that he was being controlled by pyramid scheme members in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao. Around 1 a.m. on August 23, 2016, police officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city summoned defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong to the case from the pyramid scheme hideout in a certain village in a district of Yanjiao. It was further determined that defendants Wang, Huang, and Xiong had no criminal records. The facts related to sentencing were confirmed by evidence presented in court by the public prosecutor, including the case registration form, the record of capture, the statement of the inquiry into criminal records, basic information on permanent residents, and other evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts after in-court cross-examination.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from 2009 to August 2013, the defendants Tan and Wu jointly operated a casino on the third floor and basement of the \"Almei\" convenience store on Wuyang Avenue in a certain city. They used mahjong tiles as gambling tools and organized gambling gatherings with bets of 2.5 and 5 yuan in the \"Yi Pi Er Lai\" manner for multiple people. On August 14, 2013, at around 15:00, police officers from the Wuyang Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau, while on patrol, caught defendant Wu and eight gamblers including Yang and Xiao on the spot, confiscating three automatic mahjong machines and gambling funds totaling 10,965 yuan. On the same day at around 19:00, defendant Tan voluntarily went to the Wuyangba Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau to turn himself in, and truthfully confessed to the fact of jointly operating a casino with defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Tan and Wu during the trial, and were sufficiently substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Gong, and others, as well as by evidence including the police on-site investigation record, inspection record and photos, four accounting notebooks, seizure process records, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that starting from February 25, 2013, the defendants Xie, Lin, in collaboration with others, opened a casino under defendant Xie's small shop in a village in a town in a certain county. They organized group gambling in the form of dominoes \"thirty-two cards\", and defendants Xie and Ji were responsible for collecting the initial stakes at the casino. On March 1 of the same year, police officers raided the involved casino, capturing 24 gamblers on the spot and seizing unclaimed gambling funds totaling 72,600 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie, Lin, and Ji during trial, and were corroborated by their previous confessions, testimonies from 24 witnesses including Peng, Jin, and Zhang, identification records, photos, a set of \"dominoes\", 400 RMB, defendant Ji's prior criminal records, household registration information, the circumstances of the arrest, and other evidence, which are sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in March 2016, the defendant Yang applied for a timber harvesting permit with a timber stock of 5 cubic meters due to house repairs, but the accumulation of 67 harvested pine trees exceeded the permit's limit by 5.9571 cubic meters. In April of the same year, the defendants Yang and Yao did not apply for a harvesting permit and agreed that Yao would be responsible for harvesting trees in Yang's forest and selling the lumber, and they would split the proceeds equally. Subsequently, Yao hired others to harvest a total of 299 pine trees in Yang's forest over three occasions, amounting to a timber stock of 40.696 cubic meters, and sold part of the lumber for a profit of 8,100 yuan.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that starting from August 2018, the defendants Li and Jiang jointly operated the Xinhua Tang Empire KTV Club located on the third floor at XXX Hutai Road, Baoshan District, this city. During this period, Li and Jiang instructed the club’s employees to sell counterfeit foreign liquors of brands such as “CHIVAS,” “BALLANTINE’S,” “MARTELL,” “HENNESSY,” to customers. On November 13, 2019, the police seized over 200 bottles of the aforementioned counterfeit branded foreign liquors at the Xinhua Tang Empire KTV Club. After identification, it was determined that the seized foreign liquors were all counterfeit products infringing on the exclusive rights of the relevant registered trademarks. Among them, 224 bottles were counterfeit liquor intended for sale, valued at over 140,000 yuan; 12 bottles were counterfeit liquor already sold and stored by clients, valued at over 10,000 yuan. On November 13, 2019, the defendants Li and Jiang were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the main facts of the crime. Upon surrender, Li returned 60,000 yuan of illegal gains, and Jiang returned 20,000 yuan of illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Jiang during the trial, and are supported by testimonies from witnesses Xiong, Yin, Zhang, Zou, and others; documentary evidence such as the seizure decision and inventory list provided by the police; trademark registration certificates, identification reports provided by the rights holders and their agents; witness testimonies from Cai and others; the price list of liquors provided by witnesses, and the confessions of defendants Li and Jiang; the account of their capture provided by the police; the residence information of the defendants; as well as the seizure decision and inventory list provided by the prosecution, which are sufficient to substantiate the conviction.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial was conducted, it was ascertained that around 8 pm on February 10, 2017, the defendants Jin and Chang sneaked to the back of Building No. 1 in the Bailing District Dahuau South Gate Community in this city. Defendant Chang acted as a lookout while defendant Jin used lock-picking tools to pry open an orange Yadea electric bicycle parked there by the victim, Wang (estimated value of 2170 yuan). They then pushed it to Nanshaomen Crossroad in this city and handed it over to defendant Chang. Defendant Chang gave defendant Jin 280 yuan, and later, defendant Chang lost the stolen goods. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Jin and Chang during the trial. Moreover, the report of the incident, statements from the victim, arrest materials, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, crime scene identification photos, pricing appraisal of the involved item, urine test report and photos, the confessions of the defendants, and the household registration information of defendants Jin and Chang provide sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on the evening of March 23, 2015, at around 10 p.m., Zhu (already prosecuted) and XX agreed to meet under the pedestrian overpass near Zhongshan Hospital in Sanli Street, Yaohai District, Hefei City, to settle a personal grudge with a fight. Zhu later gathered 11 people including Liu, Li, another Zhu, and Zhao (all four have been prosecuted) and brought fighting tools such as steel pipes and wooden sticks. XX gathered more than 10 people including the defendants Lian, Yue, and Fan (handled in a separate case) and brought fighting tools such as plastic pipes and bricks. At around 2 a.m. on April 24, 2015, more than 20 people from both sides, led by Zhu and XX, used these pre-arranged tools to fight under the pedestrian overpass near Zhongshan Hospital in Sanli Street, Yaohai District, Hefei City. During the fight, XX was injured in the head. According to the forensic assessment, XX's injury constituted minor injury level 1. The facts established during the trial are consistent with those charged by the prosecution. Additionally, it was found that on December 15, 2015, the defendant Lian was arrested by public security organs in a certain city and was detained for three days at the detention center in the Dongcheng District of that city. On January 2, 2016, the defendant Yue was arrested by public security organs at Changsha Railway Station and was detained for four days at the detention center of the Changsha Railway Public Security Office. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Lian and Yue during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as household registration certificates, records of arrest, detention certificates, forensic medical assessment reports on the degree of bodily injury, and confessions from co-defendants such as Zhu, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lian": ["Imprisonment"], "Yue": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on May 18, 2014, at around 21:00, the defendants Chen and Liu conspired to steal cables from the Yejishan Tunnel to sell for money. Chen drove his black and blue minivan with a license plate of Ji G×××××, carrying Liu and hydraulic pliers to a location 40 meters south of the boundary marker between two counties inside the Yejishan Tunnel on Provincial Road 345. Liu got off the vehicle, and Chen drove out of the tunnel and parked near the north exit. He then walked back into the tunnel to join Liu. Together, they lifted the concrete slabs covering the cable trench and cut a total of 65.24 meters into 35 sections of Qingyapai ZR-YJV22, 8.7/15KV, 3X70 cables, which were already in maintenance mode and in use. They piled the cables in the trench, and upon being discovered by patrol personnel, Chen and Liu hid in the cable trench and were subsequently caught on the spot. According to the appraisal by the price verification center of a certain county, the value of the stolen cables amounted to RMB 19,624. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court trial. Additionally, it is supported by evidence such as the case registration form and the decision to file a case from a certain county's public security bureau, the seizure list, the item transfer list (one hydraulic plier), the process of capture, witness testimonies from Lian, Li, and Zheng, the price verification conclusion report by the county's price verification center regarding the stolen cables, the seizure record from the county public security bureau, site survey records, schematic site plan, photo descriptions, site identification records, photographic descriptions; the criminal judgment document No. 1 (2011) of Taipu Temple County People's Court of Inner Mongolia, the prison release certificate No. 189 (2013) from Xilin Gol League Prison, Inner Mongolia; household registration certification letters, etc., which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charged: At around 22:00 on March 17, 2015, at Candy KTV on Siping Road in Kuiwen District of a certain city, a dispute occurred because the victims, Wang Yi and Zang, along with their friends, brought their own alcohol to Candy KTV for singing, which was stopped by the KTV staff, defendants Liu and Sun. This led to a scuffle between the two parties, during which defendant Zhang joined Liu and Sun in assaulting victim Wang Yi with punches, kicks, and a helmet, and later, in collaboration with defendant Liu, used a baseball bat to assault victim Zang. This resulted in Wang Yi suffering facial and right-hand injuries, causing soft tissue contusions, a frontal process of the maxilla, and bilateral nasal bone fractures; and Zang suffering head and facial injuries, leading to scalp and soft tissue lacerations. Forensic medical assessment determined Wang Yi's injuries as minor (Level 2), and Zang's injuries as minor. After the incident, defendants Zhang, Liu, and Sun turned themselves in to the public security bureau on March 18, 2015, confessing to the acts of injuring Wang Yi and Zang. The families of defendants Zhang, Liu, and Sun collectively compensated the victims a total of 60,000 yuan, and received forgiveness from victims Wang Yi and Zang, who agreed not to pursue criminal responsibility against the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and were substantiated by documentary evidence of the capture process, population information, phone inquiry records, settlement agreements, and receipts; testimonies of witnesses Duan, Yan, Zhao, Wang Jia, and Jia; statements from victims Wang Yi and Zang; forensic opinions (Weifang) Public (Kui) Injury Word (2015) No. 83 and No. 84 forensic medical injury assessment reports; identification records and other evidence are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that: In early November 2020, the defendant Zhang contacted the defendants Ai and Feng, stating he knew a person on WeChat with the username \"Gratitude,\" who could help facilitate the buying and selling of corporate accounts and business licenses at a price of 2,000 yuan per set. Defendants Ai and Feng, despite being aware that their accounts would be used for illegal activities, decided to proceed with the sale. On November 3, 2020, defendants Ai and Feng went to a certain country's Construction Bank at the Huludao Shuanglong branch to open corporate public accounts under their names. On November 6, 2020, defendant Ai handed over the two sets of business licenses, corporate accounts, bank settlement cards, and a certain type of U device to defendant Zhang. On the evening of November 6, defendant Zhang sold the two sets of business licenses, corporate accounts, bank settlement cards, and the U device to the person with the WeChat username \"Gratitude.\" After receiving cash from the buyer, Zhang transferred 3,700 yuan to Ai via WeChat. From November 12 to November 17, the corporate accounts under the names of Ai and Feng had more than 2,500 transactions, with a total amount of over 71 million yuan. The defendants did not dispute these facts in court, and they are supported by evidence such as household registration forms, character assessments, account opening information, transaction details from a certain country's Construction Bank, a statement from the Yuhuang Police Station, WeChat transaction details of Ai and Feng, transfer records of Ai and Feng, a statement from a certain country's Construction Bank, Feng's criminal judgment and release certificate, business licenses of Xin Xin Home Living and a certain Home Goods Store, seals from a certain Zhuo, testimony from witness Guo, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang, Ai, and Feng, audio-visual materials, electronic data, etc. These pieces of evidence were verified in court and are sufficient to substantiate the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On August 21, 2016, the defendant Zuo, in order to fraudulently obtain insurance compensation, conspired with Xiao (handled in another case), and in collusion with Li and Lu, staged a traffic accident involving a Renault car with license plate SuE×××××, a Toyota car with license plate SuExxxxxx, and a Citroën car with license plate SuE××××× on Gangao Road, Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone, to defraud 21,900 RMB from China Life Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. After the incident, a relative of the defendant Zuo returned 21,900 RMB on their behalf, which has been refunded to the victim unit. On March 18, 2020, defendant Li turned himself in to the Zhangjiagang Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts, willingly admitting guilt and accepting punishment. After being captured, defendants Zuo and Lu also truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts, willingly admitting guilt and accepting punishment. It is recommended to sentence defendant Zuo to ten months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB; defendant Li to six months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB; defendant Lu to eight months of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 RMB, all with probation applicable. Defendants Zuo, Li, and Lu have no objections to the charged facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and have signed and confirmed the agreement. Additionally, the case is confirmed with the testimony of witnesses Xiao, Yuan, and Zuo, motor vehicle insurance claim records, road traffic accident identification reports, driver's licenses, vehicle registration certificates, scene photos, payment vouchers, seizure records, seizure lists, return lists, arrest warrants, crime report processes, arrest processes, the confessions of defendants Zuo, Li, and Lu, demographic information, and other evidence. This court hereby confirms.", "label": {"Zuo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 8 a.m. on June 4, 2015, and June 5, 2015, the defendants Liu and Wen, while purchasing scrap iron at Hansheng Daily Necessities (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. on Qingxiang Road, Longhua New District, a certain city, collaborated with the defendants Hu and Zhong, who were purchasing scrap paper at the same company, to steal scrap iron. Liu and Wen secretly hid the scrap iron on the truck used by Hu and Zhong to carry scrap paper, which was then covered with scrap paper and transported out of the company by Hu and Zhong. Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong jointly stole about 200 kilograms of scrap iron on two occasions, which Hu and Zhong sold for about 500 yuan, with Liu and Wen receiving a total of 80 yuan. On June 6 of the same year, Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong stole 420 kilograms of scrap iron using the same method. During the theft, they were discovered by employees of Hansheng Daily Necessities (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and the police arrived at the scene and arrested the four defendants. According to the appraisal, the stolen 420 kilograms of scrap iron was worth 460 yuan, and it has been returned to the victimized unit. After coming to light, Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong compensated the losses of the victimized unit, and the unit issued a letter of understanding to express their forgiveness towards Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu, Wen, Hu, and Zhong during the court trial, and there was corresponding evidence verified in court to substantiate them, which is sufficient to establish the findings.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on March 8, 2014, at approximately 15:30, defendants Ding and Qian, along with co-defendant Zhou (already sentenced) and others Jiang and Wang (both handled in separate cases), were at the east gate of Yangzi Park on Daqing South Road in this city where they had a verbal disagreement with the victim, Yang, resulting in an altercation. Consequently, they assaulted the victim, Yang, causing him injuries. Forensic identification determined Yang's injuries to be minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Ding and Qian voluntarily reported to the police and truthfully confessed their crimes, and they have obtained the victim Yang's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Ding and Qian during the trial without objections and were substantiated by the victim Yang's statement, witness testimony from Zhou and others, identification records, forensic appraisal reports, letters of forgiveness, household registration documents, and evidence from the investigation and case solving process. This is sufficient for substantiation.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention"], "Qian": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that the defendants Zhu and Ma conspired and, in October 2015, went to various places such as a location and a village in this city. Using the method of Zhu unlocking doors to enter houses and Ma acting as a lookout, they committed theft three times, stealing over 6,400 yuan in cash and one Bingger brand watch valued at 378.30 yuan, as well as cigarettes and other items. On October 29, 2015, at dawn, defendant Zhu, together with others, went to a room in a village in this city, used the method of unlocking doors to enter, and stole cash and one Casio quartz watch from the victim Jiang. Subsequently, Zhu received 200 yuan. On November 5, 2015, at dawn, defendant Zhu, together with others, went to a room in another location in this city, used the method of unlocking doors to enter, and stole cash from the victim Li, subsequently receiving 600 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendant Ma truthfully confessed to his crimes. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Ma during the trial. There was also testimony from the victims Fan, Huang, Xu, Jiang, and Li, presented by the public prosecutor and verified during the trial, along with relevant identification records, identification photographs, call records, the watch purchase receipt, a price verification report on the Bingger watch issued by the Price Certification Center of Nanchang District, Wuxi City, site inspection records issued by the public security agency, the process of solving the criminal case, resident information, criminal judgments, and proof of release, all of which are sufficient to establish the case. Based on the evidence presented and verified during the trial, this court has accepted the factual defense opinions proposed by defendant Zhu.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Public Prosecutor's Office in a certain area charges: Anhui Jiahe Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. is a limited liability company established on August 22, 2013. On September 30, 2014, the legal representative of the company was the defendant Zhu, and the defendants Wei and Feng were among the shareholders of the company. In November of the same year, due to poor management, the company suddenly closed and suspended operations, leaving wages owed to company employees unpaid. As the three defendants could not be found, some of the company's employees reported the case to the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City. On November 7 and November 12, 2014, the bureau issued \"Labor Security Supervision Orders for Rectification\" to Anhui Jiahe Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd., ordering the company to pay the arrears of wages. The company and the three defendants did not comply and did not provide the labor department with explanations. On November 13, 2013, the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City, transferred the case to the public security organs. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution provided the court with physical evidence: two cash journals; documentary evidence of case registration forms, household registration certificates, case process records, and descriptions provided by the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Yushan District, Ma'anshan City; statements from victims Zhao, Yu, Gan, Cao, and Tian; testimony from witness Wu A; confessions and defenses from defendants Zhu, Feng, and Wei, among other evidence, to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Feng": ["Detention"], "Wei": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: From November to December 2013, defendants Wei and Xu, in certain towns and townships of the county, stole 25 chickens by waylaying them on the road on multiple occasions, valued at 1,920 yuan. Defendant Ren, knowing that defendants Wei and Xu were committing theft, still provided bags to facilitate their repeated thefts of chickens. The charges by the prosecutorial authority are consistent with the facts ascertained by this court. Defendants Wei, Xu, and Ren, as well as their respective defense attorneys, raised no objections during the trial. Furthermore, the evidence is corroborated by the testimony of witness Tian; statements from victims Wang, Chen, and others; household registration certificates, records of the crime's detection and resolution; and the confessions of defendants Wei, Xu, and Ren, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on September 10, 2013, the defendant Ceng set up a gambling venue in room 1101 on the 11th floor of the \"Xianghe Restaurant\" located in the Central Street Office of Renhuai City, where Zhang, Dou, and others were organized to play a form of mahjong with a minimum bet of 1,000 yuan, from which profits were illicitly collected. On the 14th of the same month, the defendant Wang entered the gambling venue carrying 180,000 yuan in gambling funds and, upon introduction by Ceng, lent money to the gamblers. Around 16:00 on the same day, the gambling venue was raided by the public security authorities, and gambling funds totaling 309,150 yuan were confiscated. The above facts are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, household registration certificates, list of seized items, witness testimonies, explanations of the situation, inspection records, identification transcripts, and recognition transcripts. Both defendants raised no objection during the court trial, which is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that between May and December 1, 2014, the defendants Ye, Chen, Tan, and Jiang, in collusion with Li, Yu B, Yu A (all dealt with in separate cases), and others, conducted an operation in an open space opposite No. 126 Houlu, Longqiao within the district, where they pretended to gamble using Pai Gow to lure bystanders into placing bets. They used special contact lenses to see the card values clearly and remote-controlled dice to deceive victims Yang, Hao, Yang, Liu, and others out of more than 30,000 RMB. During this period, the defendant Tan was responsible for wearing contact lenses to view the cards and signaling to the dealer whether to shuffle through the speed of his bets, and controlling the dice remotely. The defendants Ye, Chen, Jiang, and others took turns acting as the dealer, gatekeeper, and flying pigeon bettors. After each successful deception, the defendant Tan received a salary of over 100 RMB, and the defendant Jiang received a salary of 50 RMB. Defendants Ye, Chen, and others divided the remaining stolen money equally after deducting related personnel's wages. At about 17:30 on December 1, 2014, while the defendants Ye, Tan, and Jiang were committing fraud at the aforementioned location, they were apprehended by police officers. Defendant Chen escaped during the commotion and later voluntarily surrendered to the police on January 4, 2015, at 9:00. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the four defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Yang, Hao, Yang, Liu, testimony from witnesses Zhou A, Zhou B, Xu, identification records, seizure orders, photographs of the instruments of the crime, surveillance video DVDs, details of their apprehension, explanatory notes, identification proofs, and the confessions and identification records of the four defendants, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on February 22, 2014, the defendants Hu and Tian, in collusion with \"Old Rogue\" (handled in a separate case), after premeditation, sneaked into the inpatient department of Taizhou Orthopedic Hospital in the Chengbei Street area of a certain city. Taking advantage of nobody being around, the defendants Hu and Tian kept lookout and provided cover while \"Old Rogue\" pried open car locks, stealing a black Qiaoge brand moped (valued at 1,900 RMB) belonging to the victim Zhu B, which was parked in front of the inpatient department, and a red 48CC moped (valued at 2,000 RMB) belonging to the victim Cheng which was also parked in front of the inpatient department. The defendants Hu and Tian, along with \"Old Rogue,\" rode the stolen mopeds to a repair shop at 14 Fanglin Road in the Lunan Street area of the Luqiao District to change locks and sell the stolen goods, where they were caught on the spot by the police. The stolen vehicles have been recovered. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Hu and Tian during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhu B and Cheng, the testimonies of witnesses Zhu A, Huang, and Yun, the identification records, the seizure list, the price appraisal conclusion, the restitution list, photos, the account of the capture, the statement of circumstances, household registration certificates, administrative penalty decision, and the re-education through labor decision, among other evidence, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that: At around 5 a.m. on September 25, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Deng, carrying tools such as scissors and screwdrivers, proceeded to the area under Building No. 165 on Xin Village North Road, Beijie Town, in a certain city. They used a method of smashing the motorcycle lock with a rock, cutting the power cord with scissors, and reconnecting the wires to start the engine, to steal a Yamaha motorcycle (license plate: [place] A×××××) parked there by the victim, Xu. At around 7 a.m. on September 25, 2013, the defendants Xiao and Deng were apprehended with the stolen goods near the village road in Maitang Village, a town in a certain county of a certain province, while they were preparing to sell the stolen property. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 7,350 yuan. After the case was solved, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented in court by the prosecutor, including the victim Xu's statement and purchase invoice, the confession of co-defendant Huang, the confessions of the defendants Xiao and Deng, the list of seized and returned items, the on-site investigation records, diagrams and photos, the valuation conclusion for the incriminated item, the identification records and photos of the two defendants recognizing each other, the identification records and photos of the two defendants recognizing co-defendant Huang, the identification records and photos of co-defendant Huang recognizing the two defendants, the photos of the two defendants identifying the stolen goods, the crime scene, and the crime tools, the criminal judgment No. 2 (1991) and No. 31 (2009) of the Foshan Criminal Court and the proof of release, the arrest process, household registration materials and other evidence, with the two defendants also confessing to the case during the trial. The above evidence, after cross-examination by both the prosecution and the defense, was investigated and confirmed to be true, the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, and the various pieces of evidence corroborate each other, sufficiently proving the above-mentioned actions of the two defendants. Defendant Xiao raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment. Defendant Deng raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 3:50 am on July 13, 2019, the defendants Zhou, Zhang, and Wang, in collusion with Zhao (handled in a separate case), were caught red-handed by patrolling police officers while illegally fishing aquatic products in a water area near a certain place on the eastern shore of the Hulun Lake Protected Area. The Fisheries Administration and Fishing Port Supervision Administration Bureau of the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve conducted tests and found a total of 40 gillnets, each 80 meters long and 1.1 meters high, with a mesh size of 10 centimeters x 40 nets. According to the certification by the Manzhouli City Price Authentication Center, 450 pounds of carp were seized, with a value of 450 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhou, Zhang, and Wang during the trial proceedings. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by evidence such as the seizure warrant, list of seized items, photos taken at the scene, police report registration form, case acceptance documents, basic information on the three defendants, explanations of the three defendants' records of illegal activities and criminal offenses, explanations of the three defendants' return to justice, a weight statement, three administrative penalty decisions by public security, witness testimony from Zhao, the fishing gear inspection opinion from the Fisheries Administration and Fishing Port Supervision Administration Bureau of the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve, the price determination conclusion from the Manzhouli City Price Authentication Center, the on-site inspection record by the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve Branch of the Hulunbuir Public Security Bureau, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From mid-January 2018 to January 25th of the same month, the defendants Feng, Xia, and Wang, for the purpose of making a profit, provided conditions for gambling in the form of \"Show Hand\" for individuals such as Jin, Liu, another Feng, and Zhu at a certain restaurant in a village in a town of Yuyao City. They illegally profited over 12,000 RMB by taking a cut from the winnings. On January 25th, 2018, defendants Feng and Xia were caught by police officers from the Sanqishi Police Station of the municipal public security bureau. On the same day, defendant Wang turned himself in at the Sanqishi Police Station and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the court trial, defendants Feng, Xia, and Wang raised no objections to these facts, which are substantiated by documentary evidence of the arrest process, the arrival process, photo explanations, personal information, witness testimonies from Jin, Liu, another Feng, and Zhu, as well as an audio-visual material CD, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city accused defendants Liang and Wang. During April 2013, while managing the \"XX Consignment Shop\" located on a certain road in a district of the city, they lent victim Wang 30,000 RMB. Due to Wang's failure to repay on time, defendants Liang and Wang forcibly took Wang to the \"XX Consignment Shop\" at around 11 p.m. on December 12, 2013, and illegally detained him, forcing him to make phone calls to raise money. During this period, defendants Liang and Wang assaulted Wang, prevented him from wearing clothes, splashed cold water on him, and engaged in acts of humiliation until they were apprehended by public security authorities at around 3 p.m. on December 14.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province charged that on September 9, 2017, at around 14:00, defendant Jing, due to debt disputes and personal conflicts, sought to confront the victim Wang for an explanation. He thus gathered defendants Luo, Zhang, and others, including Jin and Liu (handled in separate cases), to a private room on the second floor of a restaurant in a certain town of a certain district in this city. Defendant Jing had an argument with Wang. Upon seeing this, defendants Luo, Zhang, and others used extendable batons, beer bottles, and other items to assault Wang, Huang, and others, resulting in minor injuries of the first degree to victim Huang and minor injuries to victim Wang. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented various pieces of evidence in court, including criminal judgment documents, testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang Jia, statements from victims like Huang, confessions and defenses from defendants Jing and others, confessions and defenses from accomplices like Jin, identification records, onsite surveillance video, and appraisal opinions. Based on this,", "label": {"Jing": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendant Zhang purchased methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") from others with the intention of selling it, and enlisted defendant Cao to help find buyers for the methamphetamine. Subsequently, defendant Cao contacted drug user Bai. One night in the fall of 2014, defendant Cao assisted defendant Zhang in selling approximately 0.6 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Bai on Provincial Road 244 in a village in the county. They received 700 yuan in drug proceeds, from which defendant Zhang gained 600 yuan and defendant Cao gained 100 yuan. The prosecution has provided evidence to substantiate these facts, including witness testimony from Bai, and confessions and statements of defense from defendants Zhang and Cao.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on the evenings of October 23 and October 25, 2013, the defendant Cui operated a casino using \"ban tuozis\" in Mahjong at Room 3004, Building 8, Rongjiang Yuan, Xiangjiang Century City, Kaifu District, in a certain city. He hired the defendant Zhang to summon participants for gambling, while the defendant Wu was responsible for collecting fees at the casino, and the defendant Luo A was in charge of dealing and shuffling cards at the casino. On the evening of October 25, after receiving a report from the public, the police uncovered this casino, confiscated gambling funds and tools on site, and summoned five defendants and multiple gambling participants for investigation. Upon verification, the casino profited illegally, making a total of 19,400 yuan over two days. These facts raised no objections from the defendants Cui, Wu, Luo, and Zhang during the trial. Moreover, sufficient evidence verified by the police, including details of their apprehension, inspection records, evidence preservation lists; photographs of confiscated gambling funds and tools; administrative penalty decisions for gambling participants; testimonies from witnesses such as Huang, Zhang A, Wang; confessions and defenses from the defendants Cui, Wu, Luo, and Zhang; their household registration certificates and performance material evidence, were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, from April 1 to May 7, 2014, the defendants Lu and Zhang stole a total of 4 mobile phones from others on four separate occasions at the Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Hospital, with a total value of RMB 3358.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused that on June 5, 2015, at approximately 11 p.m., the defendant Tan provided a venue and gambling equipment in a room on the first floor of his own house, located across from the Finance Office of Maozifeng Village Committee in Maozifeng Town, Nanxiong City. He, together with the defendants Ceng, Lu, and six others, engaged in gambling using the method of \"pushing Pai Gow.\" Among them, defendant Ceng participated in gambling with a stake of 2,000 RMB; defendant Lu participated with a stake of 2,000 RMB; defendant Tan participated with a stake of 20 RMB; Huang participated with a stake of 3,000 RMB; Huang Jia participated with a stake of 1,800 RMB; Tan Moumou participated with a stake of 10,000 RMB; Liu Moumou participated with a stake of 204 RMB; Lei Moumou participated with a stake of 70 RMB. During this period, defendant Ceng lent 50,000 RMB to Huang for gambling and lent 5,000 RMB to Tan Jia for gambling; Huang lent 15,000 RMB to Tan Moumou for gambling. Regarding the alleged criminal facts, the public prosecution agency presented evidence to the court including the confessions of defendants Ceng, Lu, and Tan, witness testimonies, and records of the scene investigation.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination of the case, it was found that around 10 a.m. on June 23, 2015, Yang Moumou (dealt with in a separate case), suspecting that Si had reported his operation of a casino, went with defendants Zhou and Yang to Si's home, located within the Youth Vegetable Market on Renmin Road, Dianbu Town, Feidong County. There, they verbally abused and assaulted Si and his wife, Wang. The assault by Yang Moumou and Zhou resulted in multiple rib fractures for Si. Later, Yang Moumou and Zhou also assaulted Wei. Around 8 p.m. that evening, Yang Moumou and Zhou, along with \"Baldy\" (dealt with in a separate case), went to Wei's home in a certain city, claiming that Wei also participated in reporting his casino operation and overturned a mahjong machine in Wei's home. According to the assessment: Si suffered fractures of ribs 3-10 on the left side and ribs 8-10 on the right side, constituting a Grade 1 minor injury. Further investigation revealed that defendants Zhou and Yang, along with others, compensated the victim Si for economic losses amounting to 55,000 RMB. Si, Wang, and Wei expressed forgiveness for the actions of Zhou and Yang. These facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court proceedings and were corroborated by the statements of victims Si, Wang, and Wei, along with the testimonies of witnesses Liang, Yu, Jin, Yuan, Liu, and others, the identification records, on-site inspection records, site sketches and photographs, forensic identification of bodily injuries, records of apprehension, basic population information inquiry data, and agreements, enough to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In August and September 2017, the defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei conspired to establish an online casino for gambling in the \"baccarat\" manner to obtain illegal profits. They jointly invested in purchasing computers and furniture to set up the backend of the online casino in Feng’s home in a dormitory in a town of a certain county. Subsequently, Feng and others downloaded gambling software from the \"Sunbet\" gambling website platform, applied for accounts and passwords, and organized gamblers to gamble in the \"baccarat\" manner. They obtained 1.25% commission on betting amounts from the \"Sunbet\" gambling website, making a total profit of over ten thousand yuan. On December 19, 2017, the casino was uncovered by the public security authorities. During this period, Feng was mainly responsible for applying for agent accounts and passwords, assisting players with adding and withdrawing funds, and uniformly managing the casino's profits. Wang was primarily responsible for the operation of the computer platform, while Li and Wei occasionally helped with computer operations. Defendants Feng and Wei surrendered themselves to the public security authorities on March 8 and April 28, 2019, respectively. After being brought to justice, defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei all voluntarily and truthfully confessed the main facts of their crimes. It was further found that defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei each returned 2,500 yuan of illegal proceeds. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei during the court trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Luo, Zeng, Nie, and Liao, WeChat screenshots, the administrative penalty decision by the county public security bureau, identification records, identification photos of Li and Wang, the county public security bureau's seizure decision, seizure inventory, extraction records, extracted photos, the three notebooks seized from the casino, photos of gamblers arrested at the scene, on-site inspection records, on-site photos, the judicial appraisal opinion numbered Minzhongzheng [2019] No. 737, bank transaction records, documents of confession and punishment acceptance, sentencing recommendation, description of the case situation, basic information of the criminal suspects, information of permanent residents, and confessions from defendants Feng, Wang, Li, and Wei. These evidence pieces are sufficient to establish the findings.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charges: At approximately 12:00 PM on October 25, 2015, the defendants Hong and Zhou went to the parking lot west of KFC on Pozi Street in the Hailing District of this city. Taking advantage of an opportunity, they stole one Xinzhou-brand electric bicycle and one Huawei mobile phone belonging to the victim, Lu. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned items was 2,134 RMB. After committing the crime, Hong and Zhou voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The stolen electric bicycle and mobile phone have been returned by the defendants and duly returned to the victim by the public security authorities. The victim, Lu, also expressed understanding of the actions of the two defendants. In the course of the trial, Hong and Zhou raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by the victim Lu's statement, surveillance video from the crime scene, the valuation certificate, photographs of physical evidence, the sales registration certificate for the electric bicycle, receipts, the seizure decision, the seizure list, the return list, the account of surrender, and the letter of understanding, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court found that defendants Li and Tang, from mid to late February to early March 2018, jointly purchased drugs on multiple occasions from a person nicknamed \"Qi\" for their own use and sale. 1. On February 10, 2018, at approximately 9:00 PM, defendant Li sold about 0.6 grams of drugs to Yang for consumption at a price of 300 yuan at a certain lawn in a district of a city. 2. At approximately 4:00 AM on February 28, 2018, defendant Li agreed to sell about 0.5 grams of drugs to Tang Jia for consumption at a price of 300 yuan at a certain location in a district of a city. Because Tang Jia was 100 yuan short in cash, defendant Li only received 200 yuan in cash. 3. On the afternoon of March 4, 2018, defendant Tang sold approximately 0.3 grams of drugs to Xiao for consumption at a price of 300 yuan in a hotel room in a district of a city. It was also found that after the police arrested defendant Li on March 5, 2018, they searched his residence according to the law and found a white transparent plastic bag containing white crystal particles in the left pocket of his coat. The white crystal particles weighed 4.59 grams. After examination by the city's public security bureau evidence identification office, methamphetamine components were detected in the white crystal particles. The above facts were not contested by defendants Li and Tang during the trial and were corroborated by evidence provided by the public prosecution agency during the trial, which includes the case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, detention certificate, arrest warrant, release notice, residential surveillance decision, search record, extraction record, weighing record, sampling record, urine extraction record, list of seized items, explanation of circumstances, CD production instructions, case process details, household registration information, witness testimonies from Yang, Tang Jia, and Xiao, confessions from defendants Li and Tang, identification records and photos, on-site inspection reports, verification certificates, identification documents, notification of judicial opinions, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on July 3, 2018, Du, the person in charge of the mixing station of Wulatehouqi Qixiang Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., failed to inspect the surroundings and the interior of the mixer and did not sound the horn as a warning before restarting the machine after it was shut down, as per company regulations. This led to the worker, Hu, who was cleaning the tank inside the mixing station, being caught in the machine. Subsequently, the defendant Du stopped the mixer and reported the incident to the project manager and head of the Safety and Environment Department, defendant Fan. After arriving at the scene, Fan removed the victim from the mixer and took him to the hospital. On the way to the hospital, they encountered an ambulance responding to the emergency. According to the diagnosis by the emergency personnel, the victim Hu had already died. Following this, defendant Fan reported and filed the incident with the Wulatehouqi Public Security Bureau and the Wulatehouqi Safety Supervision Administration. After the incident, the Safety Committee Office of Wulatehouqi concluded that Du bore direct responsibility for the accident, while Fan was accountable for management responsibilities due to not conducting quarterly safety training for employees according to company regulations, which had a causal relationship with the occurrence of the accident. According to the judicial appraisal by the Bayannur Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identif", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment"], "Du": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Hebei Province charged that at around 5 a.m. on January 9, 2015, the defendant Hu was driving a small car with the license plate number B××××× along Yushi Road from north to south. Upon reaching the section of road at a certain village in the county, Hu encountered Zhang, who was driving an animal-drawn cart from west to east, making a left turn onto the road. The two vehicles collided, resulting in vehicle damage and the death of the animal pulling Zhang's cart. Subsequently, the defendant Huang drove a small car with the license plate number B×××××, running over Zhang's body, which was on the ground, leading to Zhang's death. According to the \"Traffic Accident Determination\" by the county's Public Security Traffic Police Brigade, both defendants Hu and Huang were primarily responsible for the accident. After the incident, the civil affairs were resolved. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: 1. documentary evidence; 2. witness testimony; 3. the confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Huang; 4. appraisal opinions; 5. on-site inspection records, examination records, and identification records, etc.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was found: On the early morning of February 14, 2014, defendants Wu and Ren, after premeditation, had Wu stay in room 416 at the Contemporary Holiday Hotel in Qiandaohu Town, Chun'an County with the victim Wang Yi. Taking advantage of Wang Yi being unprepared, Wu stole Wang Yi's Oppo N1 phone. Upon appraisal, the phone was valued at 3,281 yuan. After the incident, the phone was returned to Wang Yi through Wu; defendant Ren voluntarily turned himself in and truthfully confessed to the crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Ren during the court proceedings. The confessions of both defendants corroborated each other and were substantiated by victim Wang Yi's statement, witness Wang Jia's testimony, price appraisal report, site inspection notes, receipt, criminal judgment, arrest process, and household registration certificate, providing sufficient confirmation.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At approximately 4 AM on September 21, 2015, the defendant Yu drove a Wuling-brand van with the license plate number A×××××, carrying defendants Luo and Huang, to Weicheng Shoe Factory in the Zhaoqing City Dawang High-tech Zone. Luo and Huang were responsible for entering the dormitory of the shoe factory to commit theft, while Yu was responsible for driving and acting as a lookout outside. Luo and Huang stole from three dormitories, acquiring one Nokia 800 phone, one Samsung GT-I9100 phone, one Nokia Lumia 920T phone, two Apple 4 phones, one Apple 4S phone, and one Blackmi phone. On the same day, public security officers arrested defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu in Room 401 of the Renhe Hotel in the Dawang High-tech Zone of Zhaoqing City, recovering seven stolen phones on the spot. According to an appraisal, the value of the seven stolen phones was 4050 RMB, and the public security agency has returned the stolen phones to the victims. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. Corresponding evidence materials have been provided. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo, Huang, and Yu during the court trial, and are corroborated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, records of inspection, examination, and identification, statements of the victims, and confessions of the defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on June 4, 2012, during a session at the arbitration committee in a certain Hai City, Cong, the chairman of a certain Haiyiyu Steel Structure Co., Ltd, had a quarrel with the opposing agent Wang. After learning about this incident, the defendant Lin, in an attempt to curry favor with Cong, contacted the defendant Sui through the defendant Gao, and also involved the defendant Shang, with the intent to harm and retaliate against Wang. On the 13th of the same month, around 19:00, the defendant Lin and others followed Wang to the entrance of the Crown store in the Shiba Supermarket of the Economic and Technological Development Zone in a certain Hai. Defendant Lin instructed defendants Sui and Shang to injure Wang with a knife, causing injuries to Wang's left and right arms and back, and then fled the scene. According to the appraisal, Wang's two injuries were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the public security authorities subsequently arrested defendants Shang, Gao, and Sui, and with the assistance of Gao's relatives, Lin was also apprehended. Additionally, it was found that during the trial of this case, the victim Wang filed an incidental civil lawsuit with the court. The four defendants have compensated the victim Wang for economic losses amounting to 280,000 RMB, and Wang applied for withdrawal of the lawsuit, which the court approved. The aforementioned facts were confessed by the defendants Lin, Gao, Sui, and Shang in court. The evidence including the confessions submitted by the prosecution and verified in court, testimony from the witness Cong, statements from the victim Wang, the [2012] No. 70 forensic injury assessment report, arrest records and injury photos, household registration certificates, and the withdrawal hearing transcript, are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Sui": ["Imprisonment"], "Shang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Wang is the owner of an unlicensed assembled tractor driven by the defendant Ma. Wang knowingly instructed Ma to drive the vehicle on the road despite Ma not having a driving qualification. On May 28, 2014, at around 7 a.m., the defendant Ma, without a license, drove the vehicle west along the Linzhang line in a certain county. At the location 29 kilometers + 925 meters, the vehicle's right front tire burst, causing the vehicle to lose control and overturn into a ditch on the north side of the road. A passenger, Zhang, died on the spot. The defendant Ma is held fully responsible for the accident. The civil aspects between the two parties have been reconciled. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Ma and Wang during the court hearing. These are corroborated by documentary evidence, including an acceptance registration form, household registration certificate, the circumstances of the case, a traffic accident certification, death certificate, agreement, witness statements, on-site investigation records from a certain county's public security bureau, a diagram of the traffic accident scene, on-site photographs, and an autopsy report, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at approximately 5 p.m. on November 4, 2013, the defendants Li and Mei sold a small packet of drugs to Tan at the roadside on Anlian Road at the border of a certain district in our city and a certain village, obtaining 400 yuan in cash. They were caught on the spot. The seized drugs tested positive for methamphetamine, weighing 0.77 grams. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Mei during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony of the witness Tan, the seized illicit money and goods, the identification conclusion, on-site photos, the arrest process, and explanatory statements, all of which are sufficient to be recognized.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Mei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on July 12, 2015, defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu met and planned roles for a fraud scheme at a certain bus station in a district of a city. Defendants Liu and Liang pretended to be passengers in the waiting room of the bus station and approached the victim Luo, using the excuse of a delayed bus and offering to help change the ticket, they led Luo to the entrance of the Guangfa Bank opposite the bus station footbridge. Zhang then pretended to be a staff member assisting with the ticket change and defrauded Luo of 3,100 RMB, a bank card, and its PIN. Subsequently, Wu picked up Liu, Liang, and Zhang by taxi and went to a city train station's Agricultural Bank ATM, where Zhang and Wu withdrew 13,200 RMB in cash from Luo's bank card. It was further found that on August 13 of the same year, the police arrested defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu at the city train station. On August 25 of the same year, the families of defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu reached a compensation agreement with the victim Luo and each compensated Luo 4,275 RMB, totaling 17,100 RMB. Luo expressed understanding for the behavior of the four defendants. During the court hearing, defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu raised no objections to the above facts, corroborated by evidence such as the victim Luo's report statement and recognition record, arrest process, Agricultural Bank debit card data inquiries, account detail inquiries, household registration certificates, family compensation documents, letter of understanding, video surveillance recordings, and confessions of defendants Zhang, Liu, Liang, and Wu during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to support the conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges and confirms through court trial that from April 2020 to August 5, 2020, the defendants Peng and Ceng jointly set up a casino at Peng's residence and other locations in a certain city. They organized gambling activities using methods such as \"Niu Niu\" and \"Yao Jian,\" and profited by collecting a commission known as \"monkey money,\" amounting to more than ten thousand yuan. Afterwards, the two evenly split the illegal profits. On August 5, 2020, police officers from the city's Public Security Bureau arrested defendants Peng and Ceng, along with more than ten others, including He, who were gambling at Peng's home. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Peng and Ceng during the court hearing. The evidence presented includes: 1. documents such as the registration form for the case, non-tax revenue receipts from the provincial government, administrative penalty decisions, population information forms, and details of the arrest; 2. testimonies from witnesses Huang, Nie, Chen, Liu, Du, Xiong, Zou1, He, and Zou2; 3. confessions and defenses from defendants Peng and Ceng; 4. onsite photos and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Peng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the New District in a certain city accused: On September 9, 2017, at approximately 19:30, the defendants Zhao and Zhang, in collusion, gathered persons such as Chu, Wang 2, Qian, Ji, Gao, Wu, and Zhou at the address Room XXX, No. XXX, Lane XXX, Ruihe Road, Zhoupu Town, New District, a certain city, where they were renting, to engage in mass gambling using the online \"Baccarat\" casino. That evening, police officers seized one computer involved in the case and confiscated gambling funds amounting to 5,050 RMB. The total amount bet on that day was 75,200 RMB. After the defendants Zhao and Zhang were apprehended, they truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts; Defendant Zhao reported the crimes of others, which were subsequently verified to be true. The above facts were not contested by defendants Zhao and Zhang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Shao, Wang 1, Chu, Wang 2, Qian, Ji, Gao, Wu, Zhou, and others, as well as computer screenshot photos, seizure orders, lists of confiscated items, seizure records, relevant accounting records, decisions on the preservation of evidence, lists for the preservation of evidence, lists of confiscated items, administrative punishment decisions, relevant criminal judgments, household registration information, and the case incident process, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In August 2016, the defendants Song and Huang exploited a loophole in the Zhejiang ** Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. **** mailing platform that allowed multiple clicks on the withdrawal button to gain a multiplier effect on the withdrawal amount. By purchasing courier accounts to create false mailing orders, and once the courier fees reached the courier accounts under their control, they rapidly clicked the withdrawal button multiple times to steal funds from the company's capital pool, totaling over 20,000 RMB. After the incident, the two defendants returned a total of 21,000 RMB to the victimized unit. The evidence supporting the charges includes a receipt for the returned funds and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; CDs; and the defendants' confessions and defense statements.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a city charged that since 2012, the defendant Wang had repeatedly purchased counterfeit X certain injection from Zhang (handled in a separate case) via the internet and logistics. Wang then sold the counterfeit X certain injection to the defendants Ren and Zhou, who operated the wholesale department of a certain company's new city, as well as to Yu and Song, and profited from it. The defendants Ren and Zhou sold the counterfeit X certain injection to the defendants Xu and Sun, who were operating the drug distribution department of a certain town center hospital in a certain district, and profited from it. The defendants Xu and Sun then sold the counterfeit X certain injection to multiple village-level clinics and profited from it. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhou argued: 1. The crime amount for the defendant Zhou was relatively small, and it did not result in serious social consequences; 2. The defendant Zhou had a good attitude towards admitting guilt. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied. The defense counsel for the defendant Xu argued: 1. The defendant Xu had lesser subjective malignancy; 2. The criminal circumstances for the defendant Xu were minor; 3. The defendant Xu had a good attitude towards admitting guilt. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied, suitable for probation. The defense counsel for the defendant Sun argued: 1. The defendant Sun was an accomplice in the joint crime; 2. The defendant Sun had circumstances of surrendering voluntarily; 3. The criminal circumstances for the defendant Sun were minor. In summary, a lighter punishment could be applied, suitable for probation. Upon investigation, it was found that the criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a city were true. It was also found that this case was discovered by the investigation agency during another case, and the defendants Wang, Ren, Zhou, Xu, and Sun were all captured and brought to justice. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang, Ren, Zhou, Xu, and Sun during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as documentation explaining the case breakthrough, testimonies from witnesses such as Fang, and confessions from the defendants Wang and others, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On the evening of May 6, 2014, the defendants Yu and Li plotted in advance. Yu was responsible for stealing mobile phones, while Li was responsible for selling the stolen phones. Subsequently, Yu stole a white Samsung mobile phone from the victim, Wei, at a crowded bus stop on the west side of Zhonghua Street Square in a certain district of a certain city, and handed it to Li. When Li received the stolen phone and was preparing to sell it, both were caught. According to the appraisal, the value of the white Samsung phone was 1,032 yuan.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from January 18 to January 22, 2016, the defendant Fang organized a casino five times at No. 102, Building 5, Lane 42, Chengbei Road, Danghu Street, Pinghu City, and at No. 19, Yiyuan Lane. The defendant Ding provided the venue, the defendant Feng was responsible for skimming profits and allocating money, and the defendant Jiang was responsible for opening the door, boiling water, and arranging the cards. They gathered Li, Tu, Xu, and others to gamble in the form of \"Tongzi Gong,\" skimming a total profit of 9,300 yuan. It was also found that one basket used for skimming profits, 950 yuan in cash, and one set of Tongzi Gong tiles were confiscated from the defendant Fang. An additional 1,100 yuan in cash was confiscated from the defendant Feng. The four defendants had no major objections to the aforementioned criminal facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the case registration form, witness testimonies, inspection certificates and records, the house rental contract, the incident report, previous criminal judgment documents, public security administrative punishment decision documents, proof of unlawful and criminal records, the list of confiscated items, situation explanations, and identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the crime.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 12:30 am on November 19, 2015, defendants Hao and Kong, after premeditation, deceived Sun, the victim, into handing over an Apple 6 Plus phone worth 5,400 RMB under the pretense of needing to use the phone to make a call. This occurred in the Qixing Billiards Hall at the intersection of Yatai Street and Nanhu Avenue, Nanguan District, in a certain city. After the incident, the two defendants sold the phone for 800 RMB. At approximately 8 am on November 19, 2015, defendant Yang, aware that the phone was obtained through illegal means, purchased it from Hao and Kong for 800 RMB at a phone store located at the intersection of Donghuan Avenue and Lingdong Road in a certain city. After the incident, the stolen phone was seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hao, Kong, and Yang during the trial and were corroborated by evidence including photographs of the involved phone, records and photos from the site identification, seizure and return lists, a statement from victim Sun, confessions from defendants Hao, Kong, and Yang, and expert opinions, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Hao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Kong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial, it was confirmed that on the evening of November 18, 2019, at around 4 PM, the defendant Long found a Rural Commercial Bank savings card belonging to the victim Yu outside the \"Ronghe Tang Health Club,\" located beside Fenghuang Community on some road in a certain town of the county where he was working. He informed the Health Club owner, defendant Zhu, and asked Zhu to help him use the club's POS machine to withdraw funds with the card. Subsequently, defendant Zhu helped defendant Long use the POS machine to withdraw 3,000 yuan from the found Rural Commercial Bank savings card, and after deducting a 20 yuan service fee, transferred the obtained 2,980 yuan to defendant Long via WeChat. After receiving the money, defendant Long claimed that he would continue to use the found Rural Commercial Bank savings card the next day to withdraw funds to buy clothes for defendant Zhu and colleague Xie. The following day, at around 8 AM, defendant Zhu continued to use the POS machine to withdraw 3,000 yuan from the found savings card and transferred 1,000 yuan of it via WeChat to employee Xie. After the crime, the stolen 6,000 yuan was recovered and returned to the victim Yu. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Long and Zhu raised no objections during the trial, are supported by the permanent resident information, notes on the case situation, proof of no criminal record, merchant basic information, POS machine transaction details, bank card transaction details, WeChat transfer record screenshots, receipts, letter of understanding, seizure decision and inventory, refund list, identification photos, witness Xie's testimony, victim Yu's statement, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Long and Zhu, all presented and verified in court, and are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Long": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on May 1, 2016, at around 17:00, defendants Wu and Shi rode a motorcycle to the service center of a certain brigade office in a certain district of this city. Together, they stole a blue Suzuki Rui Shuang motorcycle belonging to the victim, Liu, which was parked within the service center. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 3,417 RMB. On June 1 of the same year, the police apprehended defendant Wu and brought him to justice. With Wu's assistance, on June 7, the police apprehended defendant Shi and brought him to justice. The stolen motorcycle had been sold by defendants Wu and Shi, and the proceeds of 1,000 RMB were squandered by them. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Shi during the trial. Additionally, these facts are confirmed by evidence including identification documents, the report materials, records of apprehension, case-solving records, receipts, compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation documents, criminal judgment documents, criminal file materials, the victim Liu's statement, a price appraisal report, on-site inspection and recognition records, surveillance video and analysis, as well as confessions from defendants Wu and Shi, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District, a certain city, charges: 1. One night in late November 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to Unit 66, North Road, Ma'an Town Station, Keqiao District, a certain city, and used a flat iron to open the corridor door, stealing a White Swan brand Free Style electric bicycle belonging to Shi, which was parked in the corridor. According to the appraisal, the electric bicycle was valued at 720 yuan. 2. In the early morning of December 6, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to No. 100, Shanhai, Shanwai Village, Ma'an Town, Keqiao District, a certain city, and entered by using a flat iron to open the door, stealing a Shanghai Forever brand TDR1016Z electric bicycle belonging to Ye, which was parked inside the auxiliary room. According to the appraisal, the electric bicycle was valued at 850 yuan. 3. In the early morning of December 8, 2013, the defendants Zhang and Yang, after prior discussion, went to No. 609, Guangming Village, Qixian Town, Keqiao District, a certain city, and entered the yard by using a flat iron to open the door, stealing three packs of Hard Shell Liqun brand cigarettes worth 60 yuan, which were placed in the trunk of the motorcycle parked in the yard by Li B. Subsequently, the defendant Zhang used the same method to enter the home of Li A in the same village, stealing 39.50 yuan in cash placed on the tricycle in the yard by Li A. After the incident, the police recovered the stolen cigarettes and cash of 39.50 yuan and returned them to the victims Li B and Li A. During the court proceedings, the defendants Zhang and Yang did not object to the above-mentioned facts, which are corroborated by the evidence including photographs of the stolen goods, the police officers' reports on the capture process and situation explanations, the list of seized and returned items, payment receipts, the testimony of Zhao, and the statements of Shi, Ye, Li B, and Li A, as well as the price appraisal conclusion, and the recognition transcripts of the defendants Zhang and Yang, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Tianhe District People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: In June 2014, the defendants Hu and Zhong rented Room XX, Building X, Longde Building, No. 371 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District of a certain city, and on July 29 of the same year, they applied for one POS machine from the certain state branch of Shenzhen YS E-Payment Technology Co., Ltd. in the name of Li. By distributing advertisements and other means, they attracted customers to the above location to cash out under the guise of swiping bank credit cards for overdraft consumption without any actual transactions, charging a fee of 1% to 1.5% of the cash-out amount. Upon investigation, it was found that the defendants Hu and Zhong used the POS machine to conduct false transactions to help Chen, Zhang, and others cash out a total of 1,479,649.04 RMB. On September 15, 2014, the defendants Hu and Zhong were arrested and brought to justice.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: On June 13, 2019, at around 21:00, defendants Zhou, Zhu, and another individual Zhu, in a certain alley of a district in Changzhou, had a verbal altercation and physical scuffle with victims Zhao A and Zhao B due to a traffic accident dispute. Defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu attacked victims Zhao A and Zhao B using fists and kicks, causing Zhao A to suffer fractures of the left nasal bone and the frontal process of the maxilla. Zhao B sustained fractures of both nasal bones, the frontal process of the left maxilla, a fracture of the fourth rib on the left side, and scarring on the forehead and face. According to forensic examination, the injuries sustained by victims Zhao A and Zhao B were classified as minor injuries level two. Furthermore, it was determined that defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu have compensated victims Zhao A and Zhao B with 538,000 RMB and obtained their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou, Zhu, and the other Zhu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by evidence including phone records, victims' medical records, civil mediation agreement, receipts, letter of forgiveness, witness testimonies from certain individuals including Wu, Li, and another Zhou, statements from victims Zhao A and Zhao B, proof of case facts and apprehension by the public security organ, recognition records and photographs, forensic medical identification report on bodily injury degree, criminal judgment, and release certificate, all sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that between May 31, 2013, and August 10, 2013, the defendants Chen and Zhao conspired to commit theft and carried out three thefts in a certain district of a certain city, stealing a total of five two-wheeled motorcycles, with a total value of 20,490 yuan. They then rode the stolen motorcycles to an area in the Huli District, after which they sold them. The detailed facts are as follows: \n\n1. In the early morning of May 31, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao stole a D××××× Light Knight Suzuki two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,078 yuan) belonging to the victim Wang Bing, and a D××××× Loncin two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 3,385 yuan) belonging to the victim Zhang from the courtyard of a private rental house at 365 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a district in a certain city.\n\n2. In the early morning of June 7, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao entered the residential courtyard of the victim Wang Yi at 306 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a certain district of a certain city, and stole a D××××× Haojue two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 3,246 yuan) and a D××××× Honda two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,783 yuan) from Wang Yi.\n\n3. In the early morning of August 19, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao stole a D××××× \"Jinlong\" two-wheeled motorcycle (valued at 4,998 yuan) belonging to the victim Yang, which was parked in the courtyard of a private rental house at 275 Xihu Pond, a village on Xiangping Street, a certain district in a certain city.\n\nOn August 19, 2013, defendants Chen and Zhao were arrested by public security authorities at a village in a district and the County Hou bus stop in the Huli District, respectively. Upon being brought to justice, defendants Chen and Zhao confessed to their criminal acts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: 1. Defendant Xu, during the operation of a certain city liquor and tobacco store, sold smuggled cigarettes of brands such as \"Esse\" and \"Marlboro\" without obtaining a special tobacco monopoly business license. In July 2014, Xu sold smuggled cigarettes of brands like \"Esse\" to defendant Zhang, valued at RMB 16,400. On December 5, 2014, the public security authorities found unsold smuggled cigarettes such as \"Esse\" and \"Marlboro\" at Xu's store, valued at RMB 46,274. The total value of these cigarettes is RMB 62,674. 2. From April to November 2014, defendant Zhang, without obtaining a tobacco monopoly retail license, repeatedly purchased \"Esse\" and \"Lion\" brand cigarettes from Xu and others with the help of defendant Chen for payment and transportation, and transported them to a certain sea area for sale, totaling RMB 65,722. Of these, Zhang has sold cigarettes worth RMB 32,749, with unsold cigarettes worth RMB 32,973 (including cigarettes worth RMB 16,400 purchased from Xu), which have been seized by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district. Additionally, it was found that Zhang was administratively punished twice by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district on December 9, 2011, and July 15, 2013, for illegal tobacco business operations. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang, Xu, and Chen during the court trial, and are substantiated by witness testimonies, quality supervision and testing reports from the Shandong Tobacco Quality Supervision and Testing Station, recognition records, search records, inventory lists of seized items, proof materials of seizures by the municipal tobacco monopoly bureau of a certain sea city district, bank account transaction details, tobacco monopoly retail licenses, arrest records, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in a certain city charges: At around 2 a.m. on October 29, 2013, Feng contacted the defendant, Chen, by phone to purchase 500 yuan worth of methamphetamine. The defendant, Chen, learned that the defendant, Yang, who was nearby, had drugs, and thus agreed to the transaction. The two parties agreed on the relevant details of the drug transaction. At around 3 a.m. on the same day, the defendant, Yang, rode a bicycle to take the defendant, Chen, to the agreed location in front of the Bank of China on a certain road in Luohu District, a certain city, to meet Ding, who came for the transaction. The defendant, Chen, handed two packets of methamphetamine to Ding and then received 500 yuan from Ding. After the transaction was completed, as the parties were preparing to leave, they were caught on the spot by police officers. The police seized 500 yuan of drug money from the defendant, Chen, and two packets of methamphetamine obtained from the transaction from Ding (which were later identified to have a net weight of 1.53 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine). Subsequently, the police arrested the defendant, Yang, in front of the Kadun Barber Shop on Fenghuang Road in Luohu District, a certain city. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: identification materials of the involved stolen money and items; 2. Documentary evidence: list of seized/returned items, call record list, apprehension report, identity information and previous convictions of the defendants; 3. Witness testimonies: testimonies of Feng and Chen Mei; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of Yang and Chen; 5. Expert opinions: \"Appraisal Document\" and \"Appraisal Conclusion Notification\"; 6. Inspection and examination records: site inspection records and photographs.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on a day in October 2012, Defendant Ding handed over his 1-inch and 2-inch photos to Defendant Chen to forge a resident identification card, so that Defendant Chen could replace him in taking a certain province's pharmaceutical qualification exam. Later, Defendant Chen contacted a person (identity unknown, at large) through the phone to forge a resident identification card, providing his identity information and Defendant Ding's 1-inch photo, for a price of 120 RMB. On November 4, 2012, Defendant Ding used the forged resident identification card to take the exam at Yiwu Industrial and Commercial College, where he was discovered by the proctor. After persuasion by Defendant Chen, Defendant Ding surrendered to the public security organs on November 7, 2012. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by Defendant Chen and Defendant Ding during the trial, and are substantiated by the acceptance of evidence list, photos of seized items, statements regarding confession, statements recognizing meritorious behavior, testimony from witness Liu, the identification of resident identification card forgery, the process of arrest, and the confessions and identification of Defendant Chen and Defendant Ding, among other evidence, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Ding": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from September to November 2013, the defendants Lu and Zhang conspired in a room at Lu's pig farm located in a village in a town in a certain city, organizing six gambling sessions using the card game \"Suo Ha\" with individuals including Gu, Shen, and Zhu. They profited a total of over 12,000 yuan from these sessions. Subsequently, the defendants Lu and Zhang each received 6,000 yuan. On February 24, 2014, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the Zhouwangmiao Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed the aforementioned crimes. The defendants Lu and Zhang raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and the witness testimonies of Gu, Shen, and Zhu, identification records and photos, criminal judgment, household registration certificates, and arrest records all serve as sufficient evidence to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, the following findings were made: \n\n1. On November 30, 2016, the defendant Zhang used his wife Li's mobile Taobao account to purchase a modified nail gun online for 200 RMB. Subsequently, Zhang purchased accessories such as scopes and steel balls online and assembled them into a firearm. On July 4, 2019, investigators from the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau, acting on a lead, found a modified nail gun, a scope, 197 nail cartridges, and 480 steel balls at Zhang's home in a certain district of a certain city. Upon evaluation, the modified nail gun was powered by gunpowder and can be classified as a firearm.\n\n2. On September 30, 2016, the defendant Gong purchased a modified nail gun from the Taobao store \"Tenghui Hardware Tools\" for 610 RMB. Later, Gong bought additional accessories such as seamless steel pipes and a scope from Taobao stores to assemble a firearm. On July 6, 2019, investigators from the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau, acting on a lead, found a modified nail gun, a scope, and 780 nail cartridges at Gong's home in a certain district of a certain city. Upon evaluation, this modified nail gun was also powered by gunpowder and can be classified as a firearm.\n\nAfter the incidents, the defendants Zhang and Gong responded to police summons and voluntarily appeared, truthfully confessing their criminal activities. Furthermore, it was found that on August 31, 2020, the Detective Team of the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau had handed over the mentioned two modified nail guns possessed by Zhang and Gong to the Security Management Team of the Baofeng County Public Security Bureau.\n\nThe above facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhang and Gong during the court hearings and were corroborated by evidence including the confessions of defendants Zhang and Gong, testimonies of witnesses Li, Wu, and Zheng, household registration and criminal record documents of defendants Zhang and Gong, details of Taobao orders, seizure lists, evaluation opinions, case registration forms, decisions to file the case, arrest and breakthrough case reports, and detention certificates, all of which have been verified during the court proceedings and are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: During October 2015, at a certain bar in a certain city, drug user Li purchased the drug ketamine (commonly known as KING powder) from defendant Zhang six times, each time for 100 yuan. One night in mid-December 2015, drug user Li purchased 100 yuan worth of ketamine from defendant Xiong at a certain bar in a certain city. On the evening of January 11, 2016, defendant Zhang and drug user Li had a conflict over drug-related finances, leading Zhang to report Li's drug use to the police. That same evening, police arrested Li at a certain bar, and Li confessed that his drug source was defendant Zhang. Subsequently, the police took both individuals for investigation. Defendant Zhang truthfully confessed to the crime of selling drugs to Li. The next day, defendant Xiong turned himself in to the police and truthfully confessed to the above-mentioned criminal facts. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Xiong during the trial, and were corroborated by witness testimony from Li, expert opinions, identity and clean record proofs of defendants Zhang and Xiong, the circumstances of the arrest, and other evidence, sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a district in Fuzhou City accused: Defendant Chen, from May 2019 to November 15, either alone or in collusion with defendant Hu and Xin (nicknamed \"Mao\", at large), Xiao (at large), and Chen1 (identity unknown, at large), etc., has been rotating to set up casinos in certain bays, villages, locations, towns, and counties in a certain district. The casino charges a 10% fee from the gambling money. Chen also hired Wu (nicknamed \"Sand\", at large) to act as a lookout around the casino. During this period, Chen and others took in illegal profits totaling 90,000 yuan, with Chen personally receiving between 40,000 and 50,000 yuan. Hu and others took in illegal profits totaling 34,000 yuan, with Hu personally receiving 17,000 yuan. Moreover, the police caught the defendants Chen and others organizing a gambling spree in the bamboo forest of the Huang family group in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district on November 15, 2019, capturing more than ten gamblers and seizing gambling funds totaling 29,145 yuan on site. The evidence used by the prosecution to ascertain the above facts includes: 1. documentary evidence; 2. identification records; 3. testimonies of witnesses including Xu2, Zou1, Deng, Huang1, Huang2, Zhang, Xiong, Zhang, Wu1, Wu2, Qiu, Zou2, Zhou1, Fang, Zhou2, Zeng1, Wang, Zeng2, Zou3, Zhu; 4. the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Hu. The procedure for collecting the above evidence is legal, the content is objective and true, and it is sufficient to confirm the accused facts. Defendant Hu does not dispute the accused facts and evidence, and voluntarily admits guilt and accepts punishment.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charges: On September 20, 2015, at around 15:00, at the suggestion of the defendant Yu, with Yu keeping watch, the defendant Wu entered the rented house of the victim Zhao located in Niuyanwu, a town in the county, by slipping through the door and stole a Lenovo Y460 laptop worth 720 RMB. They later sold the stolen goods at the Xinyu Pawn Shop on Nanjie Street, County Town, for 700 RMB, with the defendant Yu receiving 500 RMB and the defendant Wu receiving 200 RMB. After the incident, Yu's family redeemed the stolen goods and returned them to the victim Zhao, who then forgave them. It is thus concluded that the actions of the defendants Yu and Wu constitute the crime of x and should be punished according to the law. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yu and Wu during the trial and are supported by evidence that includes the statement from the victim Zhao presented and read by the prosecutor in court, testimonies from witnesses Lu, He, and others, a price appraisal report, on-site investigation records, identification records, pawn shop transaction records, arrest records, household registration certificates, a criminal judgment, a release certificate, and a letter of forgiveness, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges that between March and May 2016, the defendants Tan and Jiang, a married couple, conspired together for Tan, who worked at the workshop of an individual factory owned by victim Lu in Ertang New Village, Zonghan Street, a certain city, to steal copper rods. Defendant Jiang was responsible for selling the stolen copper rods. During this period, defendant Tan stole a total of over 150 kilograms of copper rods in several instances from the workshop, and defendant Jiang sold the stolen goods on multiple occasions for a total profit of over 3,000 RMB. According to a price appraisal, the aforementioned copper rods were valued at a total of 4,125 RMB. After being apprehended, both defendants Tan and Jiang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Tan and Jiang compensated victim Lu for the economic losses and obtained Lu's understanding and forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Jiang during the court hearing and were corroborated by Lu's testimony, testimony of witness Liu, identification records and photos, the price appraisal certificate, the administrative penalty decision, the letter of understanding, the account of the arrest, and the identification documents of both defendants, all of which provided sufficient evidence. Based on the above criminal facts and circumstances, the prosecution recommends a sentence range of five months of detention to eight months of imprisonment with a fine for defendant Tan; for defendant Jiang, a sentence range of four months of detention to six months of imprisonment with a fine, with probation being applicable.", "label": {"Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination and verification, it was found that at around 10:00 PM on August 7, 2013, the defendant Wang reached an agreement with drug user Liu to sell methamphetamine for 1000 RMB. Subsequently, Wang informed the defendant Chen of this information over the phone. At around 10:30 PM that night, the defendant Chen arrived at the road across from the former Zhuhai No. 3 Middle School in a certain district of the city and sold a small package of methamphetamine to Liu. Liu paid 1000 RMB, from which the defendant Wang received 300 RMB as compensation, and the remaining 700 RMB was collected by the defendant Chen. After the transaction, the police arrested the two defendants and Liu on the spot and confiscated a bag of white crystalline substance from Liu, 700 RMB in drug money and a Samsung mobile phone used for contacting about the drug purchase from the defendant Chen, and 300 RMB in drug money and an Apple mobile phone used for contacting about the drug purchase from the defendant Wang. Upon testing, the confiscated bag of white crystalline substance was confirmed to contain methamphetamine with a net weight of 2.98 grams. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wang during the court hearing and were corroborated by evidence including the list of evidence gathered through court investigations and verifications, customer information and call records, inspection records, seizure list and records, explanatory notes, arrest details, resident information, physicochemical test report, and the notification of appraisal opinion, which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. At around 5 am on October 13, 2015, defendant Chen, in collaboration with defendant Hong, stole a Luluka brand electric bicycle belonging to an individual named He from in front of No. 49 Hongcheng Lake Road, Qiongshan District, in a certain city. At around 6 pm the same day, Chen and Hong rode the stolen electric bicycle to an ecological accessory shop at No. 6, Heng Road, Longkun South, Qiongshan District, in the same city and sold it for 550 yuan, splitting the proceeds equally. According to the valuation by the city's price certification center, the stolen Luluka electric bicycle was valued at 3,168 yuan. 2. At around 10 pm on October 13, 2015, defendant Chen, together with defendant Hong, went to the employee parking lot of a Carrefour supermarket on Hongcheng Lake Road, Qiongshan District, in a certain city and stole a Xianglong brand electric bicycle parked there by an individual named Wu. At around 2 pm the next day, Chen was driving the stolen electric bicycle with Hong as a passenger at the intersection of Bailong North Road and Binjiang Road in Meilan District, in the same city, where they were caught by the police. According to the valuation by the city's price certification center, the stolen Xianglong electric bicycle was valued at 2,400 yuan. After the case was solved, the two stolen electric bicycles were recovered and returned to He and Wu, respectively. The above facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Hong during the trial proceedings and are corroborated by evidence including the police report, the course of the case, resident information, surveillance video discs, electric bicycle registration certificates, lists of seized and returned items, the testimony of a witness named Lin, statements from the victims He and Wu, site location maps, site photographs, identification records, and property valuation reports involved in the case, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wuchang District in a certain city of Hubei Province charged that defendants Yuan and Xu, invited by Zhang (currently at large), along with others, under the leadership and command of Zhang, on May 30, 2015, around 5:00 a.m., at Lanzhou Noodle Restaurant located at No. 42 Huangli Road, Wuchang District, participated in beating the owner, Min A, and his father, Min B, with sticks and other weapons, and destroyed the freezer, stove, tables, and other items in the store. The defendants Yuan and Xu were later apprehended by the public security organs. According to the appraisal, Min A sustained soft tissue contusions on the left upper limb and right back, with the injuries classified as minor. The destroyed property was valued at a total of 1,050 RMB. At the trial, the prosecution read and presented evidence such as the arrest and case-solving reports issued by the public security organs; documentary evidence; on-site inspection records; statements from the victims; identification records; confessions from the defendants; and expert opinions.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges and the court has found that: Defendants Qiao and Zhao, at approximately 1 a.m. on September 25, 2015, at the commercial street of Yixang Xintiandi in Yuanhe Subdistrict of this district, had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim Qu, which escalated into a mutual fight. During the altercation, the two defendants punched and kicked the victim Qu, causing fractures to Qu's right tibia and fibula. The injuries to Qu's right leg were evaluated as minor injuries of the first degree. After being brought to justice, defendants Qiao and Zhao both confessed to their crimes truthfully; they compensated the victim Qu with 75,000 RMB and obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Qiao and Zhao during the court proceedings, and are corroborated by the victim Qu's statement, testimonies of witnesses Xu and Tang, physical evidence of a belt (photographs), appraisal opinions, site records, medical records, and the accounts of the case solving and arrest process, all of which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Qiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of December 14, 2013, the defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo, in collusion with Li A (being handled in a separate case) and others, conspired and, during a game of \"Xiao Jiu\" with playing cards at the Hanyou Guesthouse in Louta Town, Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou City, used fraudulent gambling methods to deceive the victim, Lu, out of 43,000 RMB and one IOU in the amount of 60,000 RMB. Among them, the defendants Wang, Cao, and others organized the fraudulent gambling activity and arranged for the defendant Luo to pose as a gambler. The defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo were apprehended on January 9, 2014, and they truthfully confessed to the above facts upon being brought to justice. After being brought to justice, defendant Cao assisted the police in apprehending one other criminal suspect. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Wang, Cao, and Luo during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of Li, who was involved in the same case, identification records, testimonies, a seizure decision, lists of seized and returned items, the IOU, a list of collected evidence, hotel guest registration forms, call records, detention certificates, one audio CD, explanatory notes on evidence creation, this court's Criminal Judgment No. 2015 of 2012 Hangxiao Criminal Preliminary, an administrative penalty decision, accounts of the case's progression and details, the process of apprehension, and household registration certificates for defendants Cao and Luo, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on October 1, 2013, at approximately 8:30 a.m., the defendants Pang and Zhang, after having premeditated, went to a location near the bus stop at the shopping center in Suxi Town, a certain city, to commit theft. The defendants Pang and Zhang cooperated and divided tasks, taking advantage of the victim Yu and others being unaware while on the bus, and stole 100 RMB in cash from the back pocket of the victim Yu's pants. The stolen cash has now been recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants Pang and Zhang have no objection to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by the victim Yu's statement, the seizure decision, the seizure list and photos, the return list, the process of the defendants coming to light, as well as the confessions of the defendants Pang and Zhang and the identification evidence, which are sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Pang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from February 2015 to August of the same year, the defendants Cai and Xie opened a gambling setup in the form of \"Niuniu\" and \"Shisandao\" at a small shop at No. 303, Xitang Village, Hengfeng Street, in this city. They gathered individuals like Jiang, Han, and others to gamble, and profited over 20,000 RMB by taking rake-offs from the bankers. On August 19, 2015, around 21:30, police officers from the Hengfeng Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau arrested the defendants Cai and Xie at the small shop on Xitang Village, Hengfeng Street. After being brought to justice, the defendants Cai and Xie confessed to the facts of the case. The facts mentioned above were undisputed by the defendants Cai and Xie during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Jiang, Wei, Han, Fu, Zhang, Xu, Ai, and Wang, as well as recognition records, inspection records, household registration certificates of the defendants, and the evidence of their capture process, all of which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that from October 2013 to June 2014, at the request of the defendant Cai, the defendant Luo opened a member account on the gambling website \"Liansheng Shishicai\". To receive commission from bets, the defendant Luo gave the account username and password to the defendant Cai. To further obtain commission from bets, the defendant Cai handed over the account username and password to Lin, who then engaged in gambling on the aforementioned website. During this period, the defendant Cai used his own bank account to settle gambling funds for the defendant Luo and Lin or facilitated direct settlement of gambling funds between the defendant Luo and Lin. Specifically, Lin transferred a total of RMB 229,050 to the defendant Cai and RMB 95,780 to the defendant Luo; the defendant Cai transferred a total of RMB 234,110 to Lin, while the defendant Luo transferred a total of RMB 140,200 to Lin. On June 27, 2014, the defendant Cai was apprehended. The police seized a bank card, a mobile phone, a computer host, and RMB 3,000 from Cai; the bank card, mobile phone, and RMB 3,000 have been returned to the defendant Cai. On July 31 of the same year, the defendant Cai returned RMB 120,000 in illicit funds. On June 20, 2015, the defendant Luo was apprehended, and on December 17 of the same year, the defendant Luo returned RMB 120,000 in illicit funds. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Luo and Cai during the court trial, and are corroborated by the testimony and identification record of the witness Lin, the testimony of the witness Liu, the circumstances of the arrest, a statement of the situation after arrest, resident identity certificates, search transcripts, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, return lists, temporary detention receipts of property, bank account transaction records, transaction details, photos of physical evidence, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On April 15, 2015, at around 23:00, the defendant Su, upon learning that Yang, who had previously beaten him, was drinking at the \"Suhe\" bar in Jiangyou City, invited the defendant Li and others to go to the \"Suhe\" bar, stating that he wanted to hit back. Su then entered the bar with Li and others, holding a wooden stick, and struck Yang on the head with the stick. When the victim Cheng saw this, he tried to help Yang. The defendant Guo, who was in the bar, saw this and attacked Cheng. Cheng then ran outside the bar, followed by Su, Li, Guo, and others, who caught up and assaulted him. Afterwards, Su and the others left the scene. According to a forensic appraisal, Cheng's injuries were classified as minor (Grade 2), while Yang's injuries were classified as minor. On December 16, 2015, Su voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities. The prosecution stated that the above facts were substantiated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victims, confessions and explanations from the defendants, forensic appraisals, identifications, investigation records, and audio-visual materials.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Su": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was found: At around 2:00 a.m. on June 5, 2019, the defendants Lv and Sun went to Room 206 at Winter E-Sports Hotel on Nanyang Road, Xichuan County after drinking. They requested to stay in the room but were refused by Ye and Bi, who were already staying there. Lv and Sun then arbitrarily assaulted Ye and Bi. Subsequently, when Ye and others mentioned that the people in Room 301 were preventing Lv from staying in Room 206, Lv and Sun went to Room 301 of the hotel and randomly assaulted Ji, Jia, and others. According to the assessment, Ye's injuries constituted minor injuries, and Bi's injuries were also considered minor injuries. The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lv and Sun during the trial proceedings. Additionally, there are statements from the victims Ye and Bi, testimonies from witnesses Ji, Jia, Zhang, and Xiao, appraisal reports, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, explanation from Shangji Police Station of Xichuan County Police Bureau, criminal judgment, criminal record check, apprehension process, and the household registration proofs of the two defendants, which all provide sufficient evidence for recognition.", "label": {"Lv": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendants Zhang, Liao, Gao, along with Lei A, He Moumou, Wang Moumou (all handled in separate cases) and other members were engaged in pyramid selling activities at Unit 406, Building 2, Unit 3, Ziling New Village, Chengnan Street, Tonglu County, where defendant Zhang was the leader. At around 18:00 on February 19, 2013, the victim Lei B was tricked by Wang Moumou into going to this pyramid selling venue, where he was invited to participate in the pyramid selling activities. When the victim Lei B realized he had been deceived and wanted to leave, he was forcibly prevented from doing so by defendants Liao, Gao, and Lei A arranged by Zhang, who also confiscated his mobile phone, ID card, wallet, and other personal belongings, thereby detaining him. It was not until March 3, 2013, that the victim Lei B was released after being forced to pay 2,800 yuan. It was determined that the actions of the defendants Zhang, Liao, and Gao constituted the crime of x and should be punished. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang, Liao, and Gao during the trial, and were confirmed by the victim Lei B's statement read and presented in court by the public prosecutor, testimonies of witnesses Liu Moumou, X Moumou, Xu Moumou, Cao Moumou, records and photographs of the crime scene inspection, surveillance video recordings, the process of arrest, household registration proof, and other evidence, which were sufficient to reach a verdict.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On November 22, 2013, the defendants Gong and He, along with Jiang (handled in a separate case), after prior discussion, agreed that He and Jiang would be responsible for keeping watch, while Gong would use technical lock-picking methods to enter the premises. They stole from the victim Ding a Lenovo laptop, two rings, two necklaces, a bracelet, and an agate jade pendant. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items amounts to 10,460 RMB. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to support the above accusations.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that between January 28 and February 1, 2015, defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai, after prior consultation, organized gambling sessions five times by having Mo A, Mo B, Wang, and others play \"Tong Zi Gong\" in the senior activity room in Shengli Village, Xucun Town, Haining, which was jointly operated by the three defendants and Yu (to be handled separately). Defendants Gu and Wu were responsible for taking a cut of the profits while defendant Dai acted as a lookout. They collected over 7,500 yuan in total profits. Afterwards, each of the defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai earned more than 1,100 yuan. On the afternoon of February 1, 2015, the group led by defendant Gu was caught red-handed gambling by the police who confiscated 1,450 yuan of the takings, while defendant Wu escaped with 600 yuan of the profits from that day. On April 28, 2015, defendant Dai voluntarily surrendered to the Xuxiang Police Station of the Haining Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal activities. During the trial of this case, defendants Wu and Dai returned illegal gains of 1,700 yuan and 1,100 yuan respectively. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Gu, Wu, and Dai during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Mo A, Mo B, Wang and others, as well as documents such as inspection certificates, inspection records, evidence preservation decisions, evidence preservation lists, seizure decision documents, and photographs of seized items, along with arrest records, arrival records, household registration certificates, receipts, and explanatory statements, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that between March and April 2020, the defendants Jiang and Ye conspired to commit theft. They prepared tools such as pliers, gloves, and masks, and went to locations including Jixin Medical Chain Tongfutang and Taizhou Longtaiyuan Guoheng Longtai Pharmacy in Jichuan Street, Taixing City. They entered the stores by damaging the door handles of the glass doors, stealing a total of 4,645 RMB in cash (as detailed in the identification table). Among this, defendant Jiang received 2,895 RMB in cash, and defendant Ye received 1,750 RMB in cash. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution agency presented in court the statements from victims Sun and Yan, the confessions and defenses of defendants Jiang and Ye, the criminal judgment, identification records, on-site inspection records, and photographs as evidence.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Ma'anshan City charged: \n\n1. Facts of Extortion\n\nIn August 2016, the defendant Long, upon learning about the construction project of Wudan Gang Road near a certain district's Certain Garden, came up with the idea of extorting benefits from the construction unit. After discussing with the defendant Sun, the two went together to the construction site on August 19, 2016, falsely claiming that a small pond within the construction site belonged to Long, and obstructed the construction work, demanding the construction party to implement compensation fees. They later gathered local villagers and idlers multiple times to go to the site to cause disturbances, stop the construction, and forcibly demand a compensation of 50,000 yuan. On August 29, 2016, the defendant Sun saw that the construction party resumed work without paying any fees and informed Long, and under Long's arrangement, led local villagers to the site again to obstruct the construction, demanding a compensation of 50,000 yuan. The construction unit's staff then called the police, and officers arrived at the scene to arrest defendant Sun and other involved persons. After being apprehended, Sun truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. On the same day, the defendant Long, having learned that Sun and others were caught, went to the police station to inquire about the situation and was then verbally summoned by the public security organ for investigation. After being apprehended, he truthfully confessed to the criminal facts.\n\n2. Facts of Harboring Drug Users\n\nOn the afternoon of February 9, 2016, the defendant Sun harbored Zhu, Ji, and Mo to consume methamphetamine (ice) at his residence in a certain district's Certain Garden. On October 11, 2016, the defendant Sun voluntarily surrendered to authorities and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts.\n\nThe public prosecution agency has provided relevant evidence to the court regarding the criminal facts charged in the indictment.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain region charges: Since the end of May 2015, the defendants Tang, Ji, Deng, and others were hired by Sun (dealt with in another case) to assist in a casino he operated in tin houses located in various places, such as the Zhangjiapai Caoyuan in Longwan District's Puzhou Street and the North District of Guangna Tool City in Puzhou Street. Tang took a cut of 100 yuan per session as a benefit in the casino. Ji received benefits ranging from 100 to 200 yuan per session for transporting gamblers and casino staff. Deng was paid benefits ranging from 50 to 100 yuan per session for acting as a lookout for the casino. On the evening of June 14 of the same year, the casino was raided by the public security authorities, who caught 12 gamblers on the spot, including Ma and Tan, and seized gambling funds totaling 7,450 yuan. Investigation revealed that during the time the casino was in operation, it held one session per day, with more than 10 participants per session. During the period Tang and Ji were involved, the casino took in at least 8,000 yuan in cuts, while during Deng's involvement, the casino took in at least 6,000 yuan. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Luqiao District of a certain city charged that on October 18, 2012, defendants Gao, Dong, and Li, in collaboration with Teng (already sentenced), went to the east gate of the Luoyang Market in the Luoyang Subdistrict, Luqiao District, a certain city. Defendant Gao was responsible for driving and acting as a lookout, while defendants Dong, Li, and Teng stole a black wallet from the cab of a light van with the license plate J××××× belonging to the victim, Yang. The wallet contained at least over 8,000 yuan in cash. On January 12, 2014, defendant Dong was apprehended by public security authorities; on February 15, 2014, defendant Gao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. During the court trial, defendants Gao, Dong, and Li raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. The facts are supported by evidence such as the statement of the victim, Yang, the confession of the co-defendant Teng, identification records, on-site inspection records, a list of accepted evidence materials, Yang's rice company's sales inventory, the arrest process, the process of coming to the case, proof of voluntary surrender, explanatory notes, household registration certificates, public security administrative penalty decision, labor re-education decision, criminal judgment, certificate of release upon completion of sentence, and the notice of retrial of the convict, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner charged that around 13:00 on May 16, 2020, defendants Bai and Han consumed alcohol together. Han then instructed Bai to drive Han's unlicensed three-wheeled electric vehicle without a license. As they were traveling from south to north and reached the intersection north of Hu's house in Gerizhao, a certain place within the Banner, they collided with a small car driven by Gong, with license plate XXX, which was traveling from east to west. The accident caused injuries to both Bai and Han and resulted in varying degrees of damage to both vehicles. According to the forensic examination, the blood alcohol content of Bai at the time of the incident was 175.61 mg/100 ml, which constitutes drunk driving. The Traffic Police Brigade of a certain Banner's Public Security Bureau determined that Bai was fully responsible for this accident.", "label": {"Bai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Han": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On October 18, 2017, at around 19:00, defendants Er and Chang took a taxi to a village in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Bestu brand electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Huang's family, from the doorway. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 3,042 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of May 6, 2018, defendants Er and Chang rode a motorcycle to the west side of a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Jinpeng brand electric tricycle, which Zhang had parked in a pear orchard without locking it, and sold it to a certain village, receiving 1,200 yuan in illicit proceeds, which they split evenly. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 2,970 yuan. 3. On July 5, 2018, at around 9:00, defendant Er, along with Song (who has already been sentenced), rode an electric bicycle to the east side of a village in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. Er incited Song to steal an electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Xu. Song was caught by the public while escaping on the stolen electric tricycle and was brought to the police station. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 2,833 yuan. 4. On September 13, 2018, at around 17:00, defendants Er and Chang rode a motorcycle to the east side of a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to look for an opportunity to steal. They stole a Sanchuan brand electric tricycle with its key left inside, belonging to Han, and sold it to a certain village, receiving 1,600 yuan in illicit proceeds, which they split evenly. According to the price assessment, the stolen electric tricycle is valued at 3,080 yuan.", "label": {"Er": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that in September 2013, the defendants Shi and Wang (who are husband and wife) learned that a bean sprout producer named Wen in a certain county was investigated by the local public security bureau for using rootless bean sprout growth hormone to produce bean sprouts. As a result, they shut down their own workshop, which had been using a bean sprout growth hormone containing 6-benzyladenine to produce bean sprouts since 2007, in order to wait and see. More than 20 days later, seeing that there were no actions taken to rectify bean sprout production in the county, the defendants Shi and Wang resumed using the growth hormone containing 6-benzyladenine to produce soybean sprouts and mung bean sprouts, which they sold in the county's Eastern Vegetable Market, Wanfeng Supermarket, Haoyouduo Supermarket, and Hualin Supermarket. Testing by the Hebei Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau's Testing and Quarantine Technology Center found that the soybean sprouts produced by the defendants contained 132μg/kg of 6-benzyladenine, and the mung bean sprouts contained 12143μg/kg of 6-benzyladenine. The defendants Shi and Wang raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial. Their admissions are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Sun, Bai, Xiang, Liu, Wu, Hu, and Yuan; on-site inspection records; test reports from the Hebei Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau’s Testing and Quarantine Technology Center; the national \"Hygienic Standards for the Use of Food Additives\" GB2760-2007; the Ministry of Health General Office’s response regarding issues related to the \"Standards for the Use of Food Additives\" (GB2760-2011); certifications from the county’s Wanfeng Supermarket, Haoyouduo Supermarket, and New Cooperation Life Supermarket; records of the defendants coming into custody; lists and photos of seized items and documents; the case initiation decision; and photocopies of the defendants’ IDs—all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged: In April 2017, Chen (dealt with in a separate case) at a certain bathhouse on Hefeng Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, harbored Yang (1), Huang (1), Yang (2), and Feng for prostitution activities totaling 22 times. During this period, the bathhouse employees, defendants Gai and Lu, knowingly assisted in recording the accounts for prostitution, helped use remote control alarms, and other activities. The evidence for these charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; inspection videos; inspection and identification records; the defendants' confessions and defenses, among others.", "label": {"Gai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that from early February 2015 to June of the same year, the defendant Wu, Mou conspired to seek illegal profits by purchasing two gambling-capable game machines (a total of 14 gambling machine positions) and set up a casino at No. 91, Guangchang Road, Xiaqian Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city. The defendant Wu, Mou was responsible for the daily operations such as crediting and debiting the gambling machines, cashiering, and settling accounts, receiving compensation and enjoying dividends. On June 10 of the same year, the casino was raided by the police and Mou was arrested, with the casino making a total profit of over 15,000 yuan. On September 1 of the same year, the defendant Wu, Mou was arrested by the police at the China Telecom Business Hall on Liansheng Road, Xiaqian Street, in this district, and subsequently returned illegal gains of 15,000 yuan to the public security organs. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu, Mou during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence including photos of the gambling machines, a list of seized items, testimonies from witnesses Zhou, Guan, Yang, and Cao, identification records and photos, the arrest process, payment receipts, household registration certificates, administrative penalty decisions, search, and inspection records and photos, which are sufficient to confirm the case.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On July 15, 2014, at approximately 14:00, the defendants Liu and Zheng, along with Wang (to be dealt with in a separate case), went to apartment 306, Building 8, West, Shuanggou Community, Meiling Street, in a certain city. They broke in by picking the lock and stole from the victim, He Mouyi, 5,200 yuan, 400 Hong Kong dollars (converted to 317.368 yuan), a \"HP\" brand HP540 laptop valued at 733 yuan, an \"Asus\" brand EeePC100H laptop valued at 600 yuan, a \"Nikon\" brand D3100 DSLR camera valued at 3,137 yuan, a Xiuyu jade ring valued at 250 yuan, a 9K gold bracelet valued at 3,838 yuan, a jade necklace valued at 775 yuan, and a tablet, 3 jade pendants, 4 commemorative coins, 7 coins, a silver necklace, a silver ring, a tiger tooth, a safe, foreign currency, and other items (all of which could not be appraised). On July 23, 2014, defendants Liu and Zheng were apprehended by the public security organs in a rented house in Laicuo Community, Xiyuan Street, in a certain city. During the trial, the prosecution provided evidence including physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victim, identification records, expert opinions, and confessions from the defendants to substantiate the charges. Accordingly,", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that during the period from August to September 2013, defendant Chen, without the permission of the registered trademark owner, commissioned defendant Dai to produce various models of wires bearing the counterfeit \"Huiyang\" registered trademark. These were intended for use in the water and electrical engineering project of the new building of the Fuzhou City Women and Children's Hospital. Defendant Dai, knowing that the \"Huiyang\" wires were the registered trademark of another entity, still arranged the production of models BV2.5, BV4.0, and BV6.0 as requested by defendant Chen. The total amount of counterfeit \"Huiyang\" trademarked wires amounted to RMB 134,890. Defendant Chen has paid RMB 119,680 to the account designated by defendant Dai, with the remaining RMB 15,210 yet to be paid. On September 16, 2013, the public security authorities seized a portion of the counterfeit \"Huiyang\" trademark wires at the warehouse on the construction site of the new building of the Fuzhou City Women and Children's Hospital. Defendants Chen and Dai surrendered to the public security authorities on September 16 and October 28, 2013, respectively. Regarding the criminal facts charged above, the public prosecution agency read and presented relevant evidence in court. Through evidence presentation,", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At around 9 p.m. on January 8, 2019, the defendants Zhan, Tu, Liu, and Xia went to Happy Times KTV in Xia Lu District to sing. There, they encountered the victims Huang1, Mei, and others, who wanted to confront Tu. Huang1, Mei, and two others assaulted Tu, leading to a brawl in the lobby between the two parties. Subsequently, Zhan was displeased and left Happy Times KTV with Liu, Xia, and Tu to find ZhanA at Team 182 Geological Unit to get machetes. Unable to contact ZhanA, they bought three utility knives at a nearby convenience store. Meanwhile, Zhan contacted Lei (handled in another case) through Zhang (handled in another case), asking him to bring people with machetes to Happy Times KTV to seek revenge. Zhan and the other three then returned to Happy Times KTV, where they were discovered with utility knives by Mei’s friend Liu, who seized the knives and prevented any further action. Huang1 and the others then went to Granny Hao’s Potato Chip Shop at Team 182 Geological Unit for a late-night snack. During this time, Lei brought three people with four machetes and met with Zhan and the others. All eight of them took two taxis to Granny Hao’s Potato Chip Shop. Zhan, Lei, Tu, Liu, Xia, and others rushed into the shop wielding machetes and bricks, attacking Huang1, Mei, and others. Tu threw a brick, injuring Mei’s head. Due to someone calling the police, Zhan and the others fled the scene. According to the assessment, the injuries suffered by Huang1 and Mei were", "label": {"Zhan": ["Imprisonment"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on the evening of February 25, 2020, at around 8 PM, the defendant Zhang proposed and colluded with the defendant Liang to drive a tricycle to a village in a certain town of a certain county, which Zhang had previously reconnoitered. Defendant Zhang broke the lock on the front door of the villager He’s house, and together with defendant Liang, entered the courtyard. They found some woven bags and loaded corn cobs from He’s courtyard into them and then onto their vehicle. They then went to the nearby house of villager Gong, where defendant Zhang kicked open the door and entered the courtyard. The two defendants loaded the already bagged corn cobs onto the vehicle. That night, they took the corn back to Zhang’s house. After threshing, Zhang kept over 100 jin for himself and sold the remaining 2,105 jin to Wang, a pig farmer from the same village, at a price of 0.9 yuan per jin, earning 1,890 yuan. Defendant Zhang gave defendant Liang 800 yuan. According to the market price of 1 yuan per jin, the market value of the corn stolen by Zhang and Liang was approximately 2,205 yuan. After the crime was discovered, defendants Zhang and Liang truthfully confessed to their crime and obtained understanding by compensating the victims He and Gong for their losses.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that in May 2010, according to relevant regulations, the Education Bureau of Yongnian County, Hebei Province, conducted seismic reinforcement projects on the south and north teaching buildings and dormitory of the Fifth Middle School of Yongnian County, and signed a construction contract with Handan Chengming Construction and Installation Co., Ltd. The contract amount was 1,263,900 yuan. The project was jointly overseen by the defendant Li, who was then the principal of the Fifth Middle School, and the defendant Cui, who was the head of the Comprehensive School Construction Section of the County Education Bureau, responsible for the project progress and the review and payment of the project funds. During the construction, Chengming Company received two payments totaling 700,000 yuan in January and December 2011. In early January 2012, after colluding, the defendants had Li call the construction party's person in charge, Li Moujia, requesting a transfer of 250,000 yuan to a designated account. Li Moujia instructed Niu Moumou to transfer the funds as defendant Li requested, depositing them into the bank card of Cao Moumou, a teacher at the Fifth Middle School of Yongnian County, on January 4, 2012. Defendant Li then handed over 100,000 yuan to defendant Cui in two installments. Of the remaining 150,000 yuan, 141,000 yuan was used to pay for infrastructure projects related to the school's \"campus culture construction\" and some hospitality expenses, while the remaining 9,000 yuan was used for personal consumption. After receiving the 100,000 yuan, defendant Cui used 90,969 yuan to cover expenses related to his office and the remaining 9,031 yuan for personal consumption. After the case was solved, all the funds involved were fully recovered.", "label": {"Li": [], "Cui": []}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in early July 2014, Zheng A (handled in a separate case) and the defendant Liang among others discussed fishing in the waters near Guizhou Island in a certain city. On July 4th of the same year at 19:00, Zheng A piloted an unlicensed fiberglass boat with a gasoline engine, and together with the defendants Liang and Mo, brought oxygen pumps, batteries, electric fishing guns, and other electric fishing equipment, departing from Wailingding Island to the waters 100 meters east of Guizhou Island at the boundary within a certain area, during the fishing ban period. They were using prohibited tools and methods for electric fishing when they were caught by the duty officers of the Wanshan Detachment of the Zhuhai Branch of the Guangdong Fisheries Administration. On July 22, 2014, public security personnel arrested the defendants Mo and Liang on Wailingding Island in a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liang and Mo during the trial, and were supported by the testimony of the witness Zheng, the arrest procedure, the seizure (detention) decision and list from the Guangdong Fisheries Administration Zhuhai Branch, records of confiscated items, statement of the circumstances surrounding the capture, on-site inspection records, explanatory notes, basic information on the resident population, photos of the scene and physical evidence, CDs, and other evidence sufficient to establish the case. The defense counsel, Huang, argued: defendant Mo was an accessory, employed for fishing, with minor social harm, and he had circumstances of voluntary surrender.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention"], "Mo": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained that at approximately 14:00 on January 16, 2016, defendants Wei and Lan, after premeditation, went to the section of Xinda Street in front of Xinlong Supermarket in a certain town and city to commit theft. They stole 800 RMB in cash and an \"OPPO\" R7S mobile phone valued at 2563 RMB from the pocket of the victim Zhang's jacket. On March 1, 2016, defendants Wei and Lan were apprehended by public security authorities in a certain district of a certain city in a certain province. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Lan during the trial. Additionally, these facts are supported by victim Zhang's statement, which was presented and cross-examined in court; documentary evidence of the arrest and case details; household registration certificates; the criminal judgment and release certificate; the administrative penalty decision; price appraisal report; identification records and photos; as well as surveillance video and screenshots, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In early August 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu conspired and agreed to jointly invest, with defendant Zhang providing personal information such as citizens' names and phone numbers purchased online. The three defendants then sold the information to others via QQ, WeChat, and other channels, and split the profits equally. In September 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu sold a total of over 11,500 pieces of citizens' personal information to three individuals using this method, earning illegal profits totaling 11,525 RMB. The specific facts are as follows: 1. Between September 7 and 14, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Zhang, sold over 5,000 pieces of personal information to Fan, earning illegal profits of 3,225 RMB. 2. On September 8, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Liu, sold over 500 pieces of personal information to Xu, earning illegal profits of 1,500 RMB. 3. On September 11, 2018, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu, through contact made by defendant Deng, sold over 6,000 pieces of personal information to Cheng, earning illegal profits of 6,800 RMB. On September 18, 2018, defendants Deng and Liu were apprehended by the public security bureau in a city in a certain province; on September 29, 2018, defendant Zhang was apprehended in a city in another province. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhang, Deng, and Liu all truthfully confessed their crimes and each returned illegal gains of 4,525 RMB, 3,500 RMB, and 3,500 RMB respectively (all of which were temporarily confiscated by the police).", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that during the period from April to May 2014, the defendants Liu and Wang, operating in a purchasing station located near the Bally Community in Shenbei New District of a certain city, knowingly purchased stolen cables from Ma (handled in a separate case) and others. They acquired a total of approximately 249 kilograms of cables (valued at 13,000 RMB) on three separate occasions, which they then sold and squandered the proceeds. During the trial process, the defendants Liu and Wang jointly returned the stolen money, amounting to 13,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Wang during the court trial and were corroborated by the statement of the victim Ding, the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Sun, Si, and others, as well as by the identification records, price appraisal conclusion, basic information sheet, telephone inquiry records, case sources, and arrest procedures, which sufficiently confirm these findings.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On the morning of July 23, 2013, defendants Liu and Li, along with Gong and Hu (both at large), went to the bus station in Dushan Port Town, Pinghu City. Defendants Liu, Gong, and Hu boarded a bus from Shanghai Petrochemical to a certain destination. Using the method of \"Tibetan praying for children, Peruvian currency exchanging for RMB,\" they defrauded the victim Fan of 200 yuan in cash and a gold necklace worth 2,584 yuan, totaling 2,784 yuan. Defendant Li then drove them away to escape. After the incident, defendant Li compensated the victim Fan with 1,500 yuan in cash. 2. On the morning of August 4 of the same year, defendants Liu and Li, along with Gong and Hu, went to the bus station in Zhapu Town, Pinghu City, and used the same method to defraud the victim Zhang of 200 yuan in cash and a gold bracelet worth 7,334 yuan, totaling 7,534 yuan. The gold bracelet was later seized from defendant Liu's wife and returned to the victim. These facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and they were corroborated by the victim's statements, witness testimonies, identification records, seizure orders, lists of seized and returned items, receipts, the course of the incident, explanatory notes, previous criminal judgment documents, identification evidence, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from September 2013 to May 2014, defendants Chen and Liu collaborated to produce aluminum materials counterfeiting the \"Zhensheng\" trademark. Chen provided the venue and was responsible for processing and production, while Liu provided the processing tools and technical guidance. They used a coding machine and film with the words \"Zhensheng Aluminum\" printed on it to process aluminum profiles from other brands, such as Yue Mou, into aluminum materials counterfeiting the \"Zhensheng\" trademark. These were sold at a price of 23-24 yuan per kilogram to individuals including Liu A and Chen A, with a total sales volume of 2865.2 kilograms, amounting to sales worth 66,841 yuan. After evaluation, the trademark logo on the surface protective film of the aluminum alloy profiles produced and sold by Chen and Liu was found to be identical to the registered \"Zhensheng\" trademark. After the case was uncovered, defendants Chen and Liu were apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendant Liu compensated Changsha New Zhensheng Group Co., Ltd. with 70,000 yuan, and the company expressed that it would not pursue Liu's civil legal responsibility. The public security authorities have recovered 40,000 yuan of illegal proceeds from defendant Chen. The above facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Liu during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Yi, Tang B, Zheng, Yang, Wang, Liu A, Chen A, Xie, and Tang A; the forensic identification report issued by the Judicial Identification Center of Hunan University (Hu Da Si Jian Center [2014] Zhi Jian Zi No. 10); the compensation agreement and statement of understanding; the notice of recovery of illegal income; a general payment book for non-tax revenue of a certain province; household registration data; and an explanation of the apprehension situation, all of which were sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Sanjiang Dong Autonomous County of a certain district of the Zhuang ethnic group accused that on December 7, 2018, Zhao and the defendant Rong had a verbal altercation over trivial matters under the \"Burgerism\" building next to Doye Square in Sanjiang Dong Autonomous County, leading to lingering resentment between the two parties. On the night of December 8 until around 2:00 am on December 9, Zhao contacted the defendant Cao through the defendant Li, asking Cao to inform Rong to come to Doye Square in the county, as Zhao wanted to apologize to Rong. During this period, Zhao invited Xiao, Yang, and the defendants Wei, Li, and Yao, among others, to wait with weapons for Rong at Gulouping in Doye Square. Rong and Cao went to the appointment together, and on the way, Rong contacted other helpers. At about 2:40 am on the 9th, a fight broke out after both parties met, and Rong was injured. At 2:49 am, after Cao and Rong were beaten, Cao called Cao 1, asking Cao 1 to call others for help in the fight. To prove the facts of the above accusation, the public prosecutor read and presented the following evidence in court: 1. physical evidence; 2. documentary evidence; 3. witness testimonies; 4. the defendants' confessions and defenses; 5. expert opinions; 6. records of inspections, examinations, and identifications; 7. audiovisual materials and electronic data.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Rong": ["Imprisonment"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was ascertained that at approximately 9 PM on December 2, 2013, individual drivers Wang and Hou, who were registered guests at the \"Tianyuan Inn\" operated by defendant Xiang on Yangguang Avenue, Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District of a certain city, requested sexual services from defendant Xiang. Defendant Xiang then called defendant Zhang to arrange for sex workers. Defendant Zhang organized for Zhong and Liu, sex workers from his \"Maple Leaf Leisure Club\" on Yangluo Street, to provide sexual services at the \"Tianyuan Inn.\" After Zhong and Liu arrived at the \"Tianyuan Inn,\" defendant Xiang collected a prostitution fee of 100 RMB each from Wang and Hou, and then arranged for Zhong and Liu to go to rooms 203 and 212 of the \"Tianyuan Inn\" to engage in sexual activities with Hou and Wang, respectively. Subsequently, the public security officers inspected the \"Tianyuan Inn\" and apprehended Zhong, Liu, Hou, and Wang (all of whom were administratively detained for three days). On December 5, 2013, the public security bureau criminally detained defendants Xiang and Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial proceedings and were confirmed by testimonies from witnesses Zhong, Liu, Hou, and Wang, alongside photographic evidence from the site of the prostitution offense, identification records, written evidence including the administrative penalty decision, resident information forms, and records of how the case was handled, all of which are sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged: Since October 2013, the defendants Zhao and Gan rotated running gambling dens at locations such as a farm tool factory on a certain street in the district, a private house on another street, a village on another street in \"Donghu Xingyuan,\" gathering multiple people to gamble using the \"Jie Pizi\" method. Defendant Zhao was responsible for finding gambling locations, notifying participants of the gambling time and place, arranging gambling tools, and collecting gambling commissions. Defendant Gan invited others to gamble, stood guard outside the gambling den to prevent police raids, and received payment for his services. In the early morning hours of November 5 that same year, around 1 am, police inspected the \"Donghu Xinyuan\" community in a certain village in the district and uncovered the gambling den, arresting defendants Zhao, Gan, and 22 other participants including Liu and Xu, and seized gambling funds totaling 13,500 RMB along with two decks of playing cards on site. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Gan during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Xu, Wan, and Chen, physical evidence (photographs), evidence preservation decisions and lists, lists of seized items, administrative penalty decisions, household registration information, and records of the case, which are sufficient to confirm the allegations.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency alleges that on the evening of December 19, 2014, defendants Hu and Tang conspired in advance and went together to a small shop in a certain town in a certain city. Defendant Tang acted as a lookout outside the shop, while defendant Hu entered the shop and attempted to rob the victim, Xu, of his possessions using methods such as covering his mouth and threatening with scissors. However, due to the victim Xu's resistance, the robbery was unsuccessful. The above facts were uncontested by defendants Hu and Tang during the trial process and are corroborated by evidence including the victim Xu's statement, identification records and photos, inventory lists and photos, site investigation records and photos, arrest documentation, and proof of residency, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that: At around 9 a.m. on September 5, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu cooperated and coordinated in front of No. 84, Justice Road in this city, under the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Zhou Moumou, they deceived the victim Zhou Moumou out of 90 RMB in cash, a mobile phone (unable to appraise due to incomplete appraisal factors), and 23,300 RMB in cash from a bank card, after which they absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. At around 10 a.m. on September 9, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu worked together on the sidewalk opposite the \"Kunming Maternal and Child Health Center\" on Huan Cheng West Road in this city, using the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Wu Moumou, they defrauded Wu Moumou of 300 RMB in cash, a mobile phone (valued at 3,090 RMB after appraisal), and 3,000 RMB in cash from a bank card, and then absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. At around 9 a.m. on September 16, 2015, defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu again worked together on the sidewalk opposite the \"Kunming Maternal and Child Health Center\" on Huan Cheng West Road in this city, under the pretense of splitting money picked up with the victim Yang Moumou, they defrauded Yang Moumou of 100 RMB in cash and 30,000 RMB in cash from a bank card, and then absconded with the proceeds, dividing and squandering them. Defendants Yi, Luo, and Zhu were apprehended by the public security organs on September 16, 2015, and a portion of the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victims.", "label": {"Yi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendant Wei operated a small loan company in a certain town in a certain county and had previously lent money to Zhang Yi and Zhang Jia, who later failed to repay the loans on time. On the afternoon of January 9, 2015, Wei again attempted to collect the debt from Zhang Yi without success and then instructed defendant Zheng and \"Xu\" (details not clear, now at large) to go to the vicinity of Ganma Bridge in the district of a certain city, where they pulled Zhang Yi, who was waiting there, into a yellow Volvo S60 driven by Zheng. \"Xu\" drove Zhang's Dongfeng Xiaokang van, and they took him back to Dengxu Hotel in a certain town of a certain county, checking into room 5519, where Gao and \"Xu\" kept watch over him. On the afternoon of January 10, Wei, along with Zheng, Gao, and \"Xuan\", escorted Zhang Yi to a village in a certain town of a certain county, forced the indebted Zhang Jia into the car, detained them both in room 5519 at Dengxu Hotel, and coerced them to repay the money. Around 9 a.m. on January 11, Guo and \"Pang\" (identity not determined) joined in, repeatedly threatening and beating the two in the room. In the afternoon, Wei moved the victims to room 5505. On the morning of January 12, Wei went again to room 5505 at Dengxu Hotel to continue demanding repayment from Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi without success. After leaving, he instructed Guo and \"Pang\" to beat Zhang Jia, causing injury. Afterwards, \"Pang\" and Guo took Zhang Jia to the hospital for a medi", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early hours of December 19, 2013, defendants Liu and Wang went to the courtyard near No. 239, Yangjia Village, Danxi Street, Xiangshan County and stole an electric bicycle of the Green Flag brand, valued at 1570 RMB, belonging to Ge, by using a method of pushing and connecting wires to start it. Later, defendants Liu and Wang drove the electric bicycle to the intersection of Jingnan Street and Xinfeng Road, Danxi Street, Xiangshan County, where they were discovered and apprehended by patrolling police officers. A screwdriver, used as a tool for committing the crime, was found on defendant Liu. The electric bicycle has been recovered and returned to Ge. After being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Wang truthfully confessed their crime. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wang during the trial, and are confirmed by evidence including the victim Ge's statement, photos of the crime scene identification, recognition records, site records, vehicle photos, crime tool photos, evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation list, special receipt for temporarily detained items, return list, telephone contact records, electric bicycle certificate of conformity, price appraisal conclusion by Xiangshan County Price Certification Center, statement of arrest circumstances, criminal judgment, certificate of release after serving sentence, and household registration proof, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around June 2018, the defendant Chen obtained the necessary equipment and accounts for setting up the gambling website game3799 from \"Ajun\" (at large), including computers, mobile phones, wireless WiFi, QQ accounts, bank cards, etc. Chen acted as an agent for the gambling website and operated it by providing exchange services between virtual gold beans and RMB to gamblers. From July 2018 to March 2019, the defendant Chen exchanged and collected gambling funds totaling RMB 5.27785 million through WeChat, Alipay, and bank transfers. On May 21, 2019, Chen voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, truthfully confessed his crimes, and handed over ill-gotten gains amounting to RMB 550,000. \n\nBetween July 2018 and March 2019, the defendant Zhou, knowing that Chen was operating the game3799 gambling website, assisted by providing exchange services between virtual gold beans and RMB to gamblers on the website. Zhou also assisted Chen in recruiting customer service personnel to provide such exchange services for the gambling website. Between July and August 2018, Zhou directly participated in exchanging and collecting gambling funds, totaling over RMB 500,000. From August 2018 to March 2019, Zhou helped Chen recruit Wu (at large) and \"Little Ghost\" (at large) to exchange gold beans and cash for the gambling website, totaling over RMB 5 million. From February to March 2019, Zhou helped Chen withdraw gambling funds from the bank in cash seven times, which were all handed over to Chen to purchase virtual gold beans for the gambling website, totaling over RMB 429,800.\n\nFrom August 2018 to March 2019, the defendant Yang, knowing that Chen was operating the game3799 gambling website, helped him unfreeze WeChat, Alipay, and other accounts used to collect gambling website funds. Yang helped Chen withdraw gambling funds from the bank in cash 42 times, all of which were handed over to Chen to purchase virtual gold beans for the gambling website, totaling RMB 2.43828 million. From December 2018 to March 2019, Yang also helped Chen recruit Chen1 (at large) to exchange gold beans and cash for the gambling website.\n\nTo substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read out and presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Chen, Zhou, and Yang in court.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charged that the defendant company Qing Company Limited mainly engages in the agency import trade of frozen goods. Since 2012, \"Miss Cao\" from Hong Kong Jin X Food Trading Company introduced clients for the agency import of frozen goods to Qing Company. Qing Company paid Miss Cao an introduction fee of 1,000 RMB for each batch of frozen goods. Later, at the request of Miss Cao and the clients she introduced, Qing Company underreported prices and acted as an agent to import a total of 44 batches of frozen goods. The specific method was: when Miss Cao or her introduced clients requested Qing Company to underreport the prices of frozen goods, they would directly instruct the defendant Zou with a price to underreport or ask Zou to determine the lowest price that could pass customs, after which Zou instructed the defendant Luo to create fake contracts and invoices based on the determined lowest price to provide to the customs declaration company for customs declaration. After the goods cleared customs, Qing Company charged the clients a fixed agency fee. After calculation, Qing Company, by underreporting prices, evaded a total tax payable of 515,464.87 RMB for the imported frozen goods. To prove the factual basis of the charges, the prosecution presented evidence materials such as physical evidence, documentary evidence, confessions of the defendants, witness testimonies, and expert opinions.", "label": {"Zou": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: From January to July 2014, the defendant Guan organized defendants Lin and Xu and others in a certain county of a certain province, and established Runhe Trading Co., Ltd. in the county, with Lin serving as the company supervisor and Xu and others serving as telemarketers. They impersonated after-sales customer service personnel of products previously purchased by the victim and conducted \"follow-up calls,\" falsely claiming that refunds and returns were possible but required reaching a certain spending amount. They fabricated reasons such as system malfunctions and the need for a security deposit to continually induce the victim to receive goods and make payments. Through this method, they defrauded the victim, Yang, of more than 25,000 RMB. Among them, defendant Guan was involved in defrauding more than 25,000 RMB, defendant Lin was involved in defrauding more than 23,000 RMB, and defendant Xu was involved in defrauding more than 24,000 RMB. After being apprehended, defendants Lin and Xu both truthfully confessed their crimes. To prove the facts of the charge, the prosecution presents evidence including the statement of the victim Yang, testimonies of witnesses Zhou and Pan among others, relevant identification transcripts, identification photos, photos of items involved in the case, and the confessions of the defendants.", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused: In 2015, defendants Leng, Tian, and Song, taking advantage of their positions, illegally appropriated the company's funds for themselves. Leng obtained 964,000 yuan, Tian obtained 482,000 yuan, and Song obtained 500,000 yuan. The specific facts are as follows: \n\n1. In January 2015, defendant Tian approached a certain joint-stock company on the grounds that a certain limited company (hereinafter referred to as Company 1) was experiencing financial difficulties. Using Company 1's security deposit at Company 2 as collateral, they borrowed 1.5 million yuan from Company 2, plus an overdue payment of 500,000 yuan from Company 2, totaling 2 million yuan. Leng, Tian, and Song later discussed discounting the 1.5 million yuan acceptance bill and recording the remaining 500,000 yuan in the company accounts. On January 19, according to Leng's arrangement, Song contacted Chen, who was engaged in discounting business locally, to discount the 2 million yuan acceptance bill. After verifying the authenticity of the bill, Chen deducted the discount fee and transferred 1.929 million yuan to Company 1’s corporate account that day. Song transferred 1.446 million yuan of this amount to Leng's personal account at China Construction Bank via online banking. Due to Song's brother urgently needing funds, Song transferred 482,000 yuan to his brother via online banking. The next day, Song's brother returned the 482,000 yuan to Company 1's corporate account. On February 27, Leng transferred 500,000 yuan to Song's China Construction Bank account (ending in 1100) and 482,000 yuan to Tian's account (ending in 9577) via online banking.\n\n2. On January 9, 2015, defendant Song transferred 55,000 yuan from Company 1's account and 445,000 yuan from the legal representative Shen's account to Leng. Leng did not use these funds for the company's actual operations but instead created a false voucher for payment to a supplier on December 26, 2014, to offset the amount. On October 10, 2016, defendant Leng voluntarily went to the Huanggang Public Security Bureau to submit materials explaining the situation. On December 28, 2016, defendant Song, upon receiving notification, voluntarily reported to the Huanggang Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Leng": ["Imprisonment"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that on July 12, 2020, at approximately 1 a.m., defendants Chen and Liu were walking their dog and passed the non-motor vehicle parking area in front of the Bank of China on Hongmian Road, Putuo District, in this city. They discovered that a VISP brand road bicycle belonging to the victim, Lu, was distinctively shaped and unlocked. They proceeded to steal the bicycle and hid it in the garage of the residential community where defendant Chen lived. According to the valuation, the stolen VISP brand road bicycle was worth 1,500 RMB. On July 15, 2020, defendants Chen and Liu were apprehended by the police at XXX Room, XXX Lane, Baili Road, Putuo District, in this city. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The prosecution recommended that both defendants, Chen and Liu, be sentenced to four months of detention, suspended for four months, and fined 1,000 RMB. Both defendants had no objections to the alleged facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and they signed a confession. They also raised no objections during the court trial.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on December 28, 2016, at about 2 a.m., the defendants Li and Shen went to a certain residential community on Huan Cheng Nan Road in Xishan District of a certain city. Using tools they had brought with them, they pried open and stole a white Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle parked under the building. As they were preparing to push the bicycle to the roadside to ride away, they noticed another red Tailing-brand electric bicycle parked under the building. They then used their lock-picking tools to attempt to pry open the front wheel lock of the Tailing electric bicycle but were unsuccessful. The two were about to push the pried-open white Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle towards the gate to leave when they were discovered by the security guard on duty, who reported the incident to the Yongchang Police Station. Officers arrived at the scene and apprehended the two individuals. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Li and Shen, and they are corroborated by household registration certification and criminal record documents presented by the prosecution and verified by the court, as well as the apprehension process, defendants' confessions, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, on-site identification records and photographs, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case. It was further determined that the involved Taiyuan-brand electric bicycle was valued at 3,364 RMB, and the involved Tailing-brand electric bicycle was valued at 3,102 RMB.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the trial, it was found that the defendant Zhou ran a noodle shop on a certain street in a certain town of a certain city, and employed the defendant Fang to process food such as chicken feet and duck heads. Since early 2015, the defendant Zhou purchased \"poppy shell powder\" from shop number 50 on the first floor of a vegetable market in the city, and, together with the defendant Fang, added the \"poppy shell powder\" to the soup of duck heads for sale. On October 19, 2015, this was uncovered by the Public Security Bureau of the city. According to the forensic identification center in Jinhua City, morphine was detected in the seized duck head soup from the Good Days Noodle Shop. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Zhou and Fang during the trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Cen and Zhao, the seizure list, statements of circumstances, physical evidence identification opinions, search records and photos, the process of how they were brought to justice, the confessions of the defendants Zhou and Fang, and their identity information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency alleges: On the evening of September 11, 2012, around 21:00, defendant Tian had a conflict with the victim Zhu at the \"Red Chrysanthemum\" hair salon on Hecheng Street in a certain county, due to refusing a massage. This led to a physical altercation between the two. After being hit, Tian either himself or through others, called upon defendants Yang, Wu, Xiao, and others to help him fight. Later, Tian, along with knife-wielding Yang, first arrived at a location near the People's Court entrance in the county, where they encountered the victim Zhu and others. Defendant Tian, along with knife-wielding Yang, then attacked Zhu. Subsequently, defendants Xiao and Wu also arrived at the location. Defendant Wu took a kitchen knife from Xiao and attacked the victim Zhu, while defendant Xiao punched and kicked Zhu, causing injuries to Zhu's head, face, shoulder, and other areas. According to a forensic evaluation, Zhu's injuries were classified as minor. On November 19, 2013, defendant Tian was apprehended by the police in a certain county of a certain province. On January 12, 2014, defendant Wu voluntarily surrendered to the police at Xiushan County, in a certain city. On February 7, 2014, defendants Yang and Xiao voluntarily surrendered to the police at Xiushan County, in a certain city. After the incident, the family of defendant Tian reached a civil settlement with the victim Zhu and compensated for the financial losses. Victim Zhu expressed understanding towards the harmful actions of defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu during the trial process, and there is evidence such as the defendants' household registration documents, investigation reports, arrest details, situation explanations, civil settlement agreement, payment receipts, letter of understanding, testimonies from witnesses Zhu, Wu, Dong, Li, and Ma, the victim Zhu's statement, confessions and defenses from defendants Tian, Yang, Xiao, and Wu, forensic identification report Qinggongwu Jian (2013) No. 365, inspection transcript Qinggong (Criminal) Kan (2012) No. 1205, scene diagram, scene photos, identification transcripts and photos, as well as surveillance video from the scene at the time of the incident, all proving sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: (1) In the early morning of June 1, 2013, the defendant Tang and Dai (already handled in a separate case), Yu (already handled in a separate case), Wang (already handled in a separate case), Hu Jia (already handled in a separate case), Li Moumou (already handled in a separate case), Pei (already handled in a separate case), and \"Xiao Yong\" (identity unknown, handled in a separate case) were drinking at a barbecue stall near the North Gate Bus Station in Hancheng. The victims, Sun Moumou, Zhu Moumou, and Hu Mou Yi, were initially playing cards at room 2005 of the Left Bank Business Hotel in the Binhe Community of Hancheng. Later, Sun Moumou called Tang, Pei, and Yu to join them for a card game. The defendant Tang and others did not go. While chatting at the drinking table, Tang and others expressed their dislike for Sun Moumou and others, stating that they would teach them a lesson (referring to physically assaulting Sun Moumou and oth", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in May and June 2011, the defendant Mo obtained a hunting rifle and a batch of bullets from his friend Wei, and later went hunting with the gun. On November 21, 2014, fearing detection by the public security authorities, Mo transferred the rifle and bullets to Liang's home for safekeeping. At around 18:00 on the same day, Liang brought the gun and bullets to Mo's home in the dormitory building of the telecommunications bureau in a certain city for hiding. After Mo learned that Liang had brought the gun and bullets, he discarded them near his home. On November 28, 2014, the public security authorities discovered the gun and bullets hidden under a pile of debris beside the west wall of a dormitory building in the courtyard of the Northwest Branch of China Telecom Yizhou Division on a certain road in a certain town in the city. According to the examination and appraisal by the Evidence Identification Institute of Hechi Public Security Bureau, the gun found in the pile of debris near Mo's home is a firearm as defined in the Firearms Management Law of the People's Republic of China.", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the morning of April 16, 2014, defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie discovered the victim, Wang, on Jiangnan Avenue, near Bo'ao Primary School in a district of a certain city. Defendant Xie was responsible for keeping watch nearby. Defendant Wu rode ahead of Wang and intentionally dropped a bundle of cash (totaling 228 yuan) before leaving the scene. Defendant Jian then rode to the location, picked up the bundle of cash, and used the pretense of splitting the cash to lead victim Wang to a spot near the entrance of a leather industrial park in the same district. Defendant Wu then caught up with Jian and Wang on his bike, falsely claimed that someone saw Jian and Wang pick up the money he had dropped, and demanded to check Wang's bank account deposits.\n\nEncouraged by defendant Jian, victim Wang went to a rural credit cooperative, withdrew 20,000 yuan in deposits, and, along with the cash he had on him and his ID card, handed it to defendant Wu for inspection. Defendant Wu took Wang's cash amounting to 20,013.2 yuan and the ID card and left under a false pretense. Defendant Jian then also left the scene, claiming he was going home to get money for Wu to check. Victim Wang soon realized he had been deceived and promptly reported the incident.\n\nOn the same day, public security personnel arrested defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie on Gangbao Street in the same district. Defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie confessed to the facts without disputing them. Following the incident, the police seized a bundle of cash totaling 228 yuan from defendant Xie and also seized the aforementioned 20,013.2 yuan in cash and the ID card from defendant Wu, which they returned to victim Wang.\n\nThese facts were undisputed by defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie during the trial proceedings and confirmed by several pieces of evidence, including written evidence from the process of arrest, household registration certificates, lists of seized items, restitution lists; victim Wang's statement; the statements of defendants Wu, Jian, and Xie; search records, identification records, site maps, identification photos; and video and audio materials, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain High-tech Industrial Development Zone charged that: 1. In the early hours of April 3, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye stole two desktop computer hosts and two monitors from the \"Mou Mou\" barbershop in a certain community, in a certain town, district, and place. After selling the hosts and monitors for 600 yuan, Shen gave Ye 200 yuan as a share of the stolen money. 2. In the early morning of mid-April 2016, defendant Shen entered the \"Mou Mou Industrial Company\" at No. 40 Mianxing West Road, a certain town, district, and place, by climbing over a wall and stole a total of eight bottles of liquor, including \"Maotai.\" 3. Around 1 a.m. on May 2, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye entered the \"Mou Mou Industrial Company\" at No. 40 Mianxing West Road, a certain town, district, and place, by climbing over a wall and stole three desktop computer hosts, three monitors, and two bottles of \"Fenggu Liquor King\" liquor. After selling the aforementioned computers for 3200 yuan, Shen gave Ye 1500 yuan as a share of the stolen money. 4. In the early hours of May 26, 2016, the defendants Shen and Ye were at \"Mou Mou Supermarket\" at No. 8, South Section Torch West Street, a certain district, and place. Ye acted as a lookout outside the door while Shen squeezed through the door gap into the supermarket to steal cigarettes and more than 400 yuan in cash. After Ye sold the stolen cigarettes for 1040 yuan and gave the money to Shen, Shen gave Ye 300 yuan. On June 1, 2016, the public security authorities arrested Shen and Ye.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that: On March 11, 2015, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Xu and Yang, having premeditated beforehand, went to a small goods stall at a night market on a certain street in a certain city. While the victim, Song, was selecting goods, the defendant Yang acted as a lookout, and the defendant Xu stole a BBK vivo Y927 cellphone worth 1,250 RMB from the right pocket of the victim Song's clothing. They were later apprehended. The stolen phone has been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Yang during the trial and are corroborated by the victim Song's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Han, Gong, and Wu, the appraisal report, the identification record, the seizure decision, the seizure list, the return list, the criminal judgment, the criminal ruling, the administrative penalty decision, the apprehension process, the confessions of defendants Xu and Yang, and their identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged that around 1 PM on August 28, 2014, the defendant Wang, at the city’s main bus terminal, under the pretext of taking the victims, brothers Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi, to the Mingguang Road bus station to catch a coach to a certain location, brought them to a black BYD car driven by the defendant Dan. The defendant Yang then got into the car and sat with the two victims in the back row. While the vehicle was in motion, the three defendants refused to let the victims get out of the car and verbally intimidated them, demanding that they pay the fare. The defendant Dan drove the vehicle to a location near the entrance of San Shi Tou toll booth of the expressway in the city and stopped. Victim Zhang Yi was forced to hand over 400 yuan. The defendants then continued to demand, claiming that each person needed to pay 400 yuan, which the victims refused. Subsequently, the three defendants let the victims out of the car and assaulted victim Zhang Yi, but to no avail as the victim had no money. Later, victim Zhang Jia knelt down and pleaded with the defendants for return fare, after which the three defendants threw down 200 yuan and left the scene. In regard to the aforementioned charges, the prosecution read and presented in court confessions from defendants Dan, Yang, and Wang; statements from victims Zhang Jia and Zhang Yi; testimonies from witnesses Lu and Fang; the report of the incident; the circumstances of the case; household registration information; scene investigation photos; site location maps; photos of the victims’ injuries.", "label": {"Dan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in early July 2012, defendants Xu and Zhu, after prior discussion, gained the trust of Zhou Moumou under the pretense of \"getting married and living together\" and looked for an opportunity to defraud him of money. On July 8, 2012, defendant Zhu introduced defendant Xu to Zhou Moumou in a village within the economic development zone of the city, at Longwang Mountain Villa, and actively facilitated their acquaintance. After gaining Zhou Moumou's trust, Zhou Moumou gave 1,000 yuan to defendant Xu to buy clothes. Later, defendants Xu and Zhu, under the pretense of \"renting a hotel to do business,\" fraudulently obtained a total of 30,000 yuan from Zhou Moumou. After the incident, defendant Xu voluntarily returned the 30,000 yuan of illicit money. Additionally, the victim Zhou Moumou forgave defendants Xu and Zhu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Zhu during the trial process and are sufficiently corroborated by the victim Zhou Moumou’s statements, the evidence list obtained by the municipal public security bureau, receipts and a letter of forgiveness provided by the victim Zhou Moumou, as well as arrest records and household registration certificates and other evidence.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleged that at around 9 a.m. on September 27, 2017, the defendant Zhang received a call from his friend Huang, stating that some of the construction oil materials he had stored at the construction site of Commerce City in Luoying Town had been secretly taken away. Consequently, the defendant Zhang contacted the defendants Liu, Deng, and others to go to the site to handle the matter. During the process, Zhang's group and the victims Yang and Zhou 1 disagreed on the three loads of oil materials removed by the victims' side, leading to a physical altercation during which the defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng injured the victims Yang and Zhou 1. According to an appraisal by the Evidence Identification Office of the Luojiang District Public Security Bureau in Deyang City, the victim Zhou 1 suffered a level 1 minor injury, and the victim Yang suffered a level 2 minor injury. After the fight, defendant Zhang voluntarily called the police, waited on-site for the officers, and truthfully confessed to his crime, which constitutes a voluntary surrender. Defendants Liu and Deng voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to their criminal conduct, also constituting a voluntary surrender. It was further found that after the incident, defendant Zhang compensated the victims Yang and Zhou 1 and obtained their forgiveness. During the trial, defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng did not object to the facts, which were supported by the prosecution with evidence including the basic situations of the three defendants, basic information of the permanent residents, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the confessions of the defendants Zhang, Liu, and Deng, the statements and identification records and photos of the victim Yang, the statements and identification records and photos of the victim Zhou 1, the testimonies of witnesses Tang, wi", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on July 19, 2014, at around 8:00 PM, defendants Du and Wang, along with several fellow villagers from Guizhou (who are being handled in separate cases), were standing around reflective cones placed on the side of a main village road in Hongtangtou Village, in a town of a certain district, after drinking. When the victim, Huang Jia, was driving a van carrying Huang Bing (born on July 18, 1997), Huang Yi, Lin Yi, and Huang Ding past Du and Wang, someone kicked the car, causing Huang Jia to brake. Huang Yi, who was in the passenger seat, wanted to get out to check, but was beaten by Du, Wang, and others. Subsequently, Huang Bing, Huang Jia, Lin Yi, and Huang Ding got out of the car and were also beaten. Then Huang Yi and the others fought back, and both sides used reflective cones, water horses, chairs, bamboo sticks, and other items to hit each other. After the fight stopped, the injured Huang Jia used a bamboo stick to chase away defendant Du and others, while defendant Wang was caught and knocked to the ground by Huang Jia, Huang Bing, and others. After leaving the scene, defendant Du, along with a man in a white shirt, each holding a watermelon knife about 50 to 60 centimeters long, attempted to return to the scene of the fight, but were discovered by onlookers in a nearby alley. Huang Jia and others then arrived in the alley and captured Du, knocking him to the ground, while the man in the white shirt took the opportunity to escape with the knife. As Hua", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city's Huadu District charged that, starting from October 2013, the defendants Pang and He were employed one after the other at an unlicensed arcade located on the 4th floor of No. 1 Xiangxing Street, a certain town. During their employment at this arcade, despite knowing that the arcade provided the \"Universal Shark Game Machine\" for gambling purposes, defendant Pang was still responsible for the management and opening and closing of the arcade, while defendant He was responsible for adding credits and exchanging tokens. At around 15:40 on December 1, 2013, the public security authorities conducted an inspection of the aforementioned arcade and caught the two defendants and seven gambling participants on the spot, seizing two Universal Shark Game Machines.", "label": {"Pang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused that, between March 23, 2020, and April 26, 2020, defendants Zhang and Qiao used a WeChat account with the nickname \"A. Min XX\" to post messages in several WeChat groups stating, \"I work at a loan company and can arrange for loans that won't affect personal credit even if payments are made late.\" Upon seeing this information, the victim, Gao, contacted \"A. Min XX\" to apply for a loan. Zhang, in collusion with Qiao, defrauded Gao of 3,838 yuan under the pretense of requiring a deposit, personal information packaging fee, membership fee, and big data cleansing fee for an online loan. Subsequently, Qiao and Zhang used the 3,838 yuan collected for daily expenses. After the incident, Zhang and Qiao were summoned by police officers from the Zhaluteqi Public Security Bureau. The close relatives of the defendants have compensated the victim Gao for the economic loss of 3,900 yuan and obtained forgiveness. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial, and they were corroborated by materials from the police report, the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the apprehension report, the victim Gao's statement, the records and photos of seized and retrieved items, the WeChat transfer records, the confessions of defendants Zhang and Qiao, WeChat payment bills, and the letter of forgiveness, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Fine"], "Qiao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges: On the morning of March 12, 2012, at about 9 AM, the defendant Fan, together with Wu (already sentenced), went to the blood test area of the People's Hospital in Danyang City, Jiangsu Province. Wu kept watch while the defendant Fan stole a Nokia 5320 mobile phone worth 304 RMB from the left pocket of the victim Jiang's coat. Subsequently, the defendant Fan, at the same location, also stole a Nokia X6 mobile phone worth 549 RMB from the victim Chen Jia's upper left coat pocket. On the morning of January 16, 2013, at about 9 AM, the defendants Fan and Hong opened the door and entered the temporary residence of the victim Chen Yi in a certain room of Shui Ying Yuan, Metropolitan Water Country, Xiangfu Street, in a district of this city. While stealing in the bedroom, they were discovered by the returning victim Chen Yi. The two defendants fled the scene; the defendant Fan was caught by the victim Chen Yi downstairs. On April 3, 2013, the public security authorities caught the defendant Hong in a certain county of a certain province. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Fan and Hong during the court hearing. They are corroborated by reports, statements and identification transcripts from the victims Chen Yi, Jiang, and Chen Jia, police dispatch records, testimonies from witnesses Wu, Han, Mao, and Yan, inspection records of the crime scene, price appraisal opinions, seizure decision and inventory, bail decision and bail guarantee, request for arrest approval, criminal judgment, community correction guarantee, execution notice, release certificate, explanation letter, household registration certificates, details of capture, confessions and defenses of defendants Fan and Hong, and identification transcripts among other evidence, all sufficient to be confirmed.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Hanshan District, a city in Hebei Province, charged that at approximately 3 a.m. on June 13, 2012, defendant Liu, in collaboration with defendants Peng and Yang, was at the \"Bokai Tobacco and Alcohol\" shop located on a certain street in a certain district of the city. Defendants Peng and Yang acted as lookouts, while defendant Liu used a self-made \"T\" shaped screwdriver to pry open the shop's rolling door lock. The three entered the shop and stole over 800 yuan in cash and five cartons of cigarettes, valued at 680 yuan according to an appraisal. In the early hours of the following day, the three defendants were at the \"Famous Tobacco and Alcohol\" shop located at No. 161 Zhuhe Road in Hanshan District of the city. Defendants Peng and Yang acted as lookouts while defendant Liu used a self-made \"T\" shaped screwdriver to pry open the rolling door lock. While attempting to pry open the lock of the interior glass door, they were discovered and apprehended by patrolling police officers. After the case was solved, 196 yuan in cash and part of the stolen cigarettes were recovered and returned to the victim. It is requested that, according to Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, defendants Liu, Peng, and Yang be punished for x crime. It is recommended that the three defendants be sentenced to up to one year of imprisonment and be fined. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Liu, Peng, and Yang during the trial proceeding, and are substantiated by evidence such as the capture process, victim statements, identification records and photos, price appraisal conclusion, defendant confessions, household registration proof, and current performance.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on the evening of March 1, 2014, at about 10 PM, the defendant Guo, due to a debt dispute with the victim Wang Mouyi, brought the defendant Du to the office of Wang Mouyi on the second floor of Huashang Daai Investment Company on Hongqi North Road in a certain county. Upon meeting, Guo and Du had a conflict with Wang Mouyi. Both defendants jointly assaulted Wang Mouyi, during which Du stabbed Wang Mouyi with a knife. During the assault, Wang Mouyi also suffered a head injury. Forensic examination determined that Wang Mouyi's injuries were all classified as second-degree serious injuries. The public prosecution authorities presented relevant evidence in court, considering the actions of the defendants Du and Guo to constitute the crime of x, and requested the court to sentence them according to law. After the trial, it was found that on the evening of March 1, 2014, at about 10 PM, the defendant Guo, due to a debt dispute with the victim Wang Mouyi, brought the defendant Du to the office of Wang Mouyi on the second floor of Huashang Daai Investment Company on Hongqi North Road in a certain county. Upon meeting, Guo and Du had a conflict with Wang Mouyi. Both defendants jointly assaulted Wang Mouyi, during which Du stabbed Wang Mouyi with a knife. During the assault, Wang Mouyi also suffered a head injury. Forensic examination determined that Wang Mouyi's injuries were all classified as second-degree serious injuries, resulting in two instances of level-nine disability and one instance of level-ten disability. The defendant Guo and Wang Mouyi have reached a civil compensation agreement, and the victim Wang Mouyi has expressed understanding of the actions of Guo and Du, requesting leniency in their punishment. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence examined and cross-examined in court, which is recognized by this court: 1. The confessions and defense statements of the defendants Du and Guo. 2. The statement of the victim Wang Mouyi. 3. Testimonies of witnesses Wang Moujia, Liu Moumou, and others. 4. Forensic examination opinion. 5. On-site inspection records. 6. Documentary evidence. 7. Audiovisual materials.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 10 a.m. on October 8, 2015, defendants Deng and Li, together with Deng and Wang, rode two motorcycles separately from a certain city, through a certain place, to a certain town to commit theft. At around 10 a.m. on October 9, Deng, together with Li, and Deng, together with Wang, went their separate ways in a certain city to look for opportunities to commit crimes. Deng and Li pretended to buy beauty products at the Jieyanfang Beauty Salon on Minsheng Road in a certain town. Li was responsible for diverting Huang's attention, while Deng stole Huang's Apple 6 Plus touchscreen phone from the sterilizer in the store. After committing the crime, Deng and the others immediately rode their motorcycles to a certain city. That evening, Deng sold the stolen phone for 2,000 yuan, and Li received 600 yuan. According to the price assessment by the price department, Huang's stolen Apple 6 Plus phone was valued at 4,621 yuan. To substantiate the above charges, the public prosecution agency presented evidence materials to the court, including documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinion, and identification records.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the charges by a local People's Procuratorate, at around 22:00 on April 3, 2016, the defendant Li, due to a debt dispute with Li A, invited defendant Zheng and Liu (at large) along with others to a roadside outside a village in Yunnan Province. Defendant Zheng, Liu (at large) and others damaged the vehicle driven by the victims Li Jia, Yu, and Yan, who were taking Li A home. According to the appraisal, the value of the damaged property totaled 20,285 yuan.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charged: In January 2015, the defendant Wang purchased two Toona ciliata trees located in the Luobeitun Yao Mountain Slope (place name), a field of villager Li at a certain village, a certain township, a certain county, for 300 yuan. Wang later asked the defendant Huang for help in cutting the trees. Huang then hired someone to cut down the Toona ciliata trees that Wang had purchased. According to the appraisal, the standing timber volume of the felled Toona ciliata trees was 3.162 cubic meters. On May 4, 2015, they turned themselves in to the public security organs. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Wang and Huang during the trial, and there are sufficient evidences such as the \"Case Acceptance Registration Form,\" \"Seizure List,\" \"Account of the Case,\" \"Appraisal Report,\" \"Household Registration Certificate,\" confessions of defendants Wang and Huang, testimonies of witnesses Nong (first witness), Nong (second witness), and Li, \"On-site Identification Record,\" \"Site Inspection Record,\" and \"Criminal Photographs,\" which are sufficient to establish the facts. During the trial, defendants Wang and Huang did not submit any relevant evidence to the court.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Chengzhong District, a certain city, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charges: At around 17:00 on January 16, 2016, after premeditation, the defendants Zhao and Chen went to the front of the \"Fashion Love\" clothing store D012 on Longcheng Road Underground Street in a certain city, Chengzhong District. Defendant Chen acted as a lookout while defendant Zhao stole a Xiaomi brand mobile phone from the pocket of the victim Wang's clothing. According to the evaluation by the city's Price Certification Center, the phone was valued at 700 RMB. When defendants Zhao and Chen carried the stolen phone to the intersection of Jiefang South Road and Jinyu Lane in the city's Chengzhong District, they were apprehended by the police. The police lawfully confiscated the stolen phone and returned it to the victim. The actions of defendants Zhao and Chen constitute the crime of theft, and this court is requested to punish them according to the law. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Chen during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Wang, on-site identification records and photos, inventory list of seized and returned items, price appraisal report and notification of appraisal opinion, criminal judgment and release certificate, records of the case, and household registration evidence, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that at approximately 1:00 am on September 1, 2014, the defendant Xu, while intoxicated, had an altercation with the victim Lin B below the Biancheng Hotel in a town in Lianjiang County. Lin B later drove away. The defendants Liu, Xie, Xu, and others took a vehicle with license plate Min A××××× and passed near the Great Wall Building in a certain town. Xu saw Lin B park the car below Building No. 8 at the Great Wall in a town in Lianjiang County, Xu then got out of the car and started banging on the trunk of the car driven by Lin B, which led to a quarrel and physical fight between the two. Liu and Xie, seeing the situation, stepped forward to help out of loyalty to a friend. Xie hugged Lin B from behind, and both Xu and Liu came forward using their fists and feet to beat Lin B, and struck the victim with beer bottles, causing multiple injuries to Lin B's body. According to the forensic evaluation by the Public Security Bureau of Lianjiang County, Lin B's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. On September 23, 2014, defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie compensated the victim with 70,000 RMB and gained the victim's understanding. On January 20, 2015, defendant Xu turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of Lianjiang County. The trial established that after defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie attacked and injured victim Lin B, defendant Xie stepped forward to mediate and stopped defendant Xu from continuing to attack victim Lin B. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xu, Liu, and Xie during the trial, and were corroborated by the mediation agreement, receipt, statement of repentance; testimonies from witnesses Huang, Lin A, and Wu; the victim Lin B's statement; injury identification; the crime scene inspection record; household registration certificates, and the account of the incident, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Li colluded with the defendant Mo on May 27, 2013, at around 13:00, to carry custom-made tools to 51 Second Floor, a certain road in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city. Defendant Mo acted as a lookout while Defendant Li used the aforementioned custom-made tools to pry open the door lock and enter the house, from which they stole an assembled computer host and a Mitsubishi MITSUBISHI computer monitor (worth a total of 941 RMB) belonging to the victim, Tang. On the same day, after receiving a verbal summons from the public security bureau, defendants Li and Mo went to the public security bureau for questioning. Defendant Li truthfully confessed to his criminal acts when questioned by the public security bureau that day, while Defendant Mo only truthfully confessed to his criminal acts during the third interrogation by the public security bureau on May 28. After the incident, the public security bureau returned the stolen items to the victim Tang. The prosecution suggests that this court sentence Defendant Li to a term of imprisonment ranging from six to eight months and impose a fine; and that Defendant Mo be sentenced to a term of imprisonment ranging from seven to nine months and also be fined. The aforementioned facts are substantiated by evidence including site inspection records produced by the public security bureau, photos of the crime scene and goods involved, statements from the victim Tang, related identification records, the Suinan Price Authentication Center of a certain city and district's price assessment report (SuiNanJiaJian (Zang) (2013) No. 150) on the involved property, confessions of defendants Li and Mo at the public security bureau, a list of returned items issued by the public security bureau, and the account of their apprehension, all of which the defendants Li and Mo have confessed to and are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from January 2013 to May of the same year, defendants Lin and Jin, for profit purposes, set up a QQ group on the internet. Gamblers contacted each other through this QQ group to gamble on the Game Tea House platform in the form of local Mahjong, Dou Shou, and Ludo, drawing 5% of the winnings as commission. Defendants Lin and Jin extracted over 6,000 yuan in commissions. From May to November 2013, defendants Lin and Zou, also for profit purposes, continued to gather gamblers through the same QQ group to gamble, taking 5% of the winnings as commission. Defendants Lin and Zou extracted over 8,000 yuan in commissions. It was further found, during the trial at this court, that all three defendants jointly returned 14,000 yuan in illicit gains. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin, Zou, and Jin during the court proceedings and were evidenced by witness testimonies from Wang, Zhao, Jiang, and Zhang; apprehension records; identification transcripts; search records; electronic evidence inspection records; lists of seizures; photos; bills; bank card transaction details; CDs; and household registration certificates, all sufficient to be validated.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: On December 22, 2015, at around 10 p.m., on the south side of a restaurant on Xiangshan Road, Xiangshan District, Huaibei City, defendants Zhang and Sun had a verbal altercation with the victim Song over trivial matters, which later escalated into a mutual fight. During the altercation, Sun and Song fell to the ground, resulting in injuries to Song's waist and injuries to Sun's lip and right shoulder. According to forensic identification, Song sustained a fracture of the left transverse process of the third lumbar vertebra due to trauma, categorized as a minor injury of the second degree. Sun sustained a fracture of the right clavicle due to trauma, also categorized as a minor injury of the second degree. On January 18, 2016, the close relatives of defendant Zhang and Sun reached a compensation agreement with the victim Song and obtained the victim's understanding. The prosecution read out and presented various pieces of evidence in court, including the household registration information of defendants Zhang and Sun, verification of the criminal records of the suspects, a site location diagram, site surveillance video and extraction production notes, forensic identification of bodily injuries, dispatch and arrest procedures, the reconciliation agreement, the letter of understanding and receipt, testimonies from witnesses Ji and Zhou, the statement of the victim Song, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Sun.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Around 1 a.m. on April 15, 2015, defendant Qiu was driving a car with defendants Liu, Wu, and Liu Jia, Song (the latter two are being dealt with in a separate case) wandering around the city center near the Liujin Suiyue Teahouse, where they encountered Wang, a student from the city's Experimental High School, and Liu Yi. Qiu stopped Wang and used the excuse of Wang owing money as a reason to beat him. Liu, Wu, Liu Jia, and Song, upon seeing this, also began to punch and kick Wang. Subsequently, the defendants took Wang and Liu Yi to the Xiang Riverbank in the city, forcibly confiscated their phones, and found 200 yuan in cash on Wang. Qiu then returned Liu Yi's phone and let him go. Qiu instructed Wang to borrow money from his classmates at Experimental High School, but to no avail. Qiu and the others then took Wang near the Qianqiu School, where Qiu and Liu beat Wang, while Liu Jia recorded the incident using Wang's phone. Around 6 a.m. that morning, Qiu and the others finally let Wang go. Later, Qiu pawned Wang's Apple 5S phone, worth 3,704 yuan, at the Jinding Pawn Shop in the city for 800 yuan. The prosecution has submitted to the court evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, and documentary evidence to charge defendants Qiu, Liu, and Wu with the crime of x.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of New District, a certain city, accused the defendants Xing and Zhao. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Xing connected with a client, Yang, via WeChat and agreed on the prostitution fees. The defendant Zhao then introduced a sex worker, Chen A, to client Yang at XXX Sen Yi Hotel, Qianshao Road, Heqing Town, New District, a certain city, for prostitution activities. They illegally profited from this arrangement. On September 22, 2020, the defendant Xing connected with another client, Chen B, via WeChat and agreed on the prostitution fees. The defendant Zhao then introduced a sex worker, Li XX, for prostitution activities at XXX Room, XXX Lane, Miaochuan Road, Chuansha New Town, New District, a certain city, profiting illegally. On September 23 and 24, the defendants Xing and Zhao were arrested and subsequently truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants Xing and Zhao raised no objections during the trial hearing. The facts were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen A, Yang, Li XX, and Chen B, and verified through identification records, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, WeChat and phone screenshots, administrative punishment decisions, basic information on permanent residents, case registration forms, the incident process descriptions, and the confessions and identification records of the defendants Xing and Zhao, providing sufficient evidence for the conviction.", "label": {"Xing": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 2:00 PM on October 14, 2013, the defendant Sha invited the defendant Bei to stand lookout at the entrance of 434 Linxiang Road, Linxiang District, Lincang City. While the victim, Ding, was caught off guard, Sha took a 8.52-gram pure gold necklace from Ding's neck, valued at 2,385 yuan. After the incident, the necklace was recovered and returned to the victim. During the court proceedings, both defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victim Ding, the testimony of witness Xiong, and evidence provided by the public security organs including the case registration form, household registration verification, arrest report, arrival report, extraction record and photos, appraisal opinion notification, appraisal opinion notice transcript, identification record and photos, list of seized and returned items, inspection record and photos, as well as the price appraisal conclusion issued by the appraisal department, the inspection report, and the receipt for purchasing the gold necklace, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bei": []}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it was found that in August 2017, Chen (fugitive) and another Chen (fugitive) established Ganzhou Diantuo Cultural Media Co., Ltd. in Room 501, Building 1, Zhongting Forest Mansion, Changzheng Avenue, Zhanggong District, a certain city. The defendants, Huang and Zheng, served as managers of this company, responsible for salary distribution and employee management. During this period, the two defendants, under the company's name, became agents of the \"Yinghuang Platform\" (an illegal gambling website accepting bets and awarding prizes over the internet) and hired more than ten employees as sub-agents. They issued agent numbers exclusively for them to calculate the members they developed, the betting amounts, and rebates. Company employees sent platform links to players via QQ, WeChat, etc., allowing players to enter the \"Yinghuang Platform\" through the provided links, register, recharge, and participate in gambling activities on this online platform, which used the \"Chongqing Time Lottery\" results as a medium. The defendants, Huang and Zheng, received 4% of the \"net loss amount\" on the gambling website developed by company members as a bonus. On April 18, 2018, at around 16:00, the defendants, Huang and Zheng, were arrested by public security officers. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang and Zheng during the court hearings, and were corroborated by: the case registration form, testimonies of witnesses Wei, Qi, Liao, Hua, Xue, Zhong, Peng, Chen, Ye, Liu, Zhang, Xiao, Guo, another Zhang, and Zhou, identification records and criminal photography, search warrant and search records, seizure decision and inventory list, electronic evidence inspection records, screenshots of the Yinghuang International page, housing lease agreement, site location sketches, site floor plans, and site photos, employee training and salary documents, website revenue and expenditure statements, bank card transaction flow lists, administrative penalty decision, arrest process, audiovisual materials, household registration certificates, and the defendants Huang and Zheng's confessions during the investigation, which provided sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 9 a.m. on July 25, 2019, the defendant Liu, due to an emotional dispute, had a conflict with Zhou at Zhou's home. During the conflict, Liu assaulted Zhou and smashed Zhou's home property. Liu then demanded Zhou to go downstairs with him. While continuing the dispute on the second-floor platform of Zhou's house, the defendant Yu arrived at the scene. Yu held Zhou's head and hands, and Liu stripped off Zhou's clothes. After being stripped, Zhou ran to his sedan, and Liu pulled Zhou out of the car to the trunk area to insult Zhou. Later, police from the Qiaotou police station arrived and stopped Liu's actions. The evidence supporting the above facts includes: 1. A set of documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Wang, Cui, and Han, among others; 3. The victim Zhou's statement; 4. The confessions and defenses of the defendants Liu and Yu; 5. Appraisal report; 6. On-site inspection records, site diagrams and photos, examination records and photos; 7. CD. The sources of the above evidence are legal and corroborate each other.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that since March 2014, defendants Xu and Ying, knowing that the state prohibits the addition of \"carmoisine\" and \"sunset yellow\" in meat products, nonetheless added \"carmoisine\" and \"sunset yellow\" purchased by defendant Ying to prepared foods such as duck heads, duck necks, and duck feet in order to attract customers. They sold these products at the \"＊＊ Store\" located at ** Road, **, Yue Long Street, ** County, and by August 22, 2014, when discovered by the County Market Supervision Bureau, sales had reached over 60,000 RMB. Upon sampling and testing, \"carmoisine\" and \"sunset yellow\" were detected in the prepared foods such as duck feet seized from the \"＊＊ Store\" operated by defendants Xu and Ying. According to the national food safety standard GB2760-2011, the tested items \"carmoisine\" and \"sunset yellow\" did not meet the standard requirements. On October 10, 2014, defendant Ying surrendered to public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented in court the confessions of defendants Xu and Ying, relevant witness testimonies, recognition transcripts, on-site inspection transcripts and photos, seizure lists, test reports, certification, the course of the case, and demographic information forms, among other evidence.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ying": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court investigation revealed that around 14:30 on March 9, 2014, the defendants Wei and Huang arrived near No. 46 Yilu, Shajing Street, Bao'an District. The defendants noticed that the victim, Lin, had a phone in his pocket. Defendant Huang deliberately walked alongside Lin to create a diversion, while defendant Wei used tweezers, which had been prepared in advance, to steal Lin's Coolpad phone (valued at 335 RMB according to appraisal). A bystander, Zhou, noticed and informed the victim, leading the victim and his friends to give chase. Huang feigned innocence and intentionally misled the victim by pointing him in the wrong direction. However, Zhou and two other bystanders later surrounded Huang. When the victim returned, they informed him, and Huang voluntarily returned the phone, pleading with the victim not to call the police. Seeing the unfavorable situation, Wei also emerged to plead with the victim not to report them, but the victim and others restrained them and contacted the police. Law enforcement arrived and took the two defendants for further investigation. The defendants Wei and Huang raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and relevant evidence corroborated during the trial was sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged the defendants, Chen and Zhang, with colluding with Zhou (handled in a separate case), Dong, and others on December 25, 2014, from approximately 9:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. the following day. They brought the victim, Bian, to Room XX at XX Hotel, Chengjiang Street in the said city, to demand a debt repayment. The defendants used verbal threats, slapping, and other methods to coerce the victim, Bian, into repaying the debt. During this period, the defendant Zhang used a shoe to slap the victim, Bian, while the defendant Chen repeatedly slapped the victim, Bian. These facts have been confessed multiple times by the defendants, Chen and Zhang, and there was no objection during the court hearing. Furthermore, evidence such as an IOU, outpatient medical records, hotel security management information, administrative penalty decisions, statements from the victim, Bian, testimonies from witnesses like Zhou, Dong, and Wu, identification records and photographs, population information, and the investigation process of the criminal case, all confirm these facts, which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on May 17, 2015, Yang had a dispute with a peer, Zhou, over the real estate agency business. Yang invited Zhou, Fu, and others to negotiate at the University Students Entrepreneurial Base in Hongshan District, Wuhan, where the defendant Wu was located. As the negotiations failed, Zhou and others had another physical altercation with Yang. The defendant Wu instructed the defendants Wang and Gong to encircle Zhou's car and drag the victim Fu out of the car, inflicting multiple cuts on his head and right shoulder. An assessment determined that Fu's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. After the incident, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Gong voluntarily turned themselves in, reached a mediation agreement with the victim, and obtained forgiveness. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence in court to substantiate them.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that the closed fishing season in a certain area of a certain province is from 12:00 on April 1 to 12:00 on June 1 each year. At 17:00 on May 18, 2015, defendants Liu and Shi illegally caught aquatic products using two \"electric fishing machines\" in the river channel area under the San Zhou West Sea Bridge in Lun Jiao, a district of a certain city (a tributary of a certain area). On site, a blue plastic bucket (containing 5.04 jin of fish) and two homemade \"electric fishing machines\" were seized. The prosecution provided the following evidence: the process of capture; the confessions, identification records, and on-site identifications by defendants Shi and Liu of the crime scene, tools used, and fish caught; the search record; the seizure, handling, and transfer lists; household registration certificates; announcements from the Ministry of Agriculture on the closed fishing season system in the area, implementation plans for the closed fishing season system in a specific province, and explanations of closed fishing areas in specific districts; newspapers; on-site investigation records and photographs. The prosecution believes that defendants Shi and Liu, disregarding national laws, conducted fishing using prohibited methods during the closed fishing season and in prohibited fishing areas. Their behavior violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient. They should be held criminally responsible for crime x. According to Article x of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, this court is requested to impose a sentence according to the law. Defendants Shi and Liu have no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged by the prosecution. After trial, it was found that the facts of crime x charged against defendants Shi and Liu by the prosecution are clear. The evidence, verified in court, is true and sufficient, and this court hereby confirms it.", "label": {"Shi": ["Fine"], "Liu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Defendants Xu and Shang were, respectively, the legal representative and shareholder of a certain company, responsible for its business management. From November 2011 to February 2012, defendants Xu and Shang, after prior consultation, knowingly produced 256 boxes and 4 rolls of joint tape bearing the \"LAFARGE\" trademark and 881 boxes of joint tape bearing the \"KNAUF\" trademark, without obtaining the permission of the registered trademark owners of \"LAFARGE\" and \"KNAUF.\" Among these, 150 boxes of joint tape with the \"LAFARGE\" trademark were sold at 70 yuan per box, yielding 10,500 yuan; and 45 boxes of joint tape with the \"KNAUF\" trademark were sold at 70 yuan per box, yielding 3,150 yuan. The unsold products were valued at 65,954 yuan based on the actual selling price. After the case came to light, defendant Shang voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to the facts of counterfeiting registered trademarks. After Xu's case was brought to closure, he also truthfully confessed to the facts of counterfeiting registered trademarks. During the court proceedings, defendant Xu returned illegal gains totaling 13,650 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Shang during the trial and are substantiated by evidence such as on-site transcripts, the company's basic information, change of registration details, decisions on administrative enforcement measures, the business license of the corporate legal entity, document extraction slips, photo production slips, trademark registration certificates, authorization letters, the document transferring the suspected criminal case, details of the case, explanatory notes, and household registration certificates of both defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court investigation established that at approximately 13:00 on July 31, 2013, defendants Lu and Wang, for the purpose of making a profit, gathered Chai, Wu, Xu, Meng, Xu, and others to engage in gambling using the “Tunzi 28” method at the home of Shen, located at 117 Zhuzidou, Yangshuhe Village, Lianshitown, Nanxun District of the city, and earned over 1,000 RMB from it. On August 2, 2013, at approximately 13:00, defendants Lu and Wang, with the intent of making a profit, gathered Shen, Shen, Lao, Xu, Xu, and others to gamble at the same location and profited by taking a rake-off of 5,600 RMB. In summary, defendants Lu and Wang organized two gambling sessions, obtaining a profit of over 6,600 RMB. After the incident, the public security authorities confiscated illicit money amounting to 5,600 RMB. The facts mentioned above were not contested by defendants Lu and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as permanent resident registration forms, population information, the testimonies of witnesses Shen, Lao, Meng, Xu, Xu, Ye, and others, detention certificates, an account of the capture, inspection records, identification records, explanatory statements, and the confessions of defendants Lu and Wang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on November 13, 2013, due to quality issues with the cement used in the construction of Qian's house, at around 14:00 that day, Jidong Cement Factory salesperson Yang Yi, Meng, and engineer Gao, among others, drove to Qian's house in a certain village in a development zone to resolve the cement quality issue. Upon arrival, Yang Yi, Meng, and Gao parked their vehicle in the alley in front of Qian's house. Later, Qian blocked the alley entrance with a truck and closed his front door. During the discussion about the cement quality issue at Qian's home, a dispute arose, and Qian and defendant Wang assaulted the three victims, claiming, \"No one can leave until this is resolved.\" Around 15:00, Qian called defendant Zhang to the scene, who then assaulted Yang Yi upon arrival. The victims were not allowed to leave Qian's house until approximately 20:00 that day. Forensic identification confirmed that Yang Yi's injuries were minor. On December 23, 2013, defendant Qian voluntarily turned himself in to law enforcement, and on November 6, 2014, defendants Wang and Zhang also voluntarily turned themselves in. All three defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts after arriving at the police station. Additionally, it was confirmed that after the incident, the defendants compensated the victims Yang Yi and Gao for their economic losses and received their understanding. These facts were not disputed by defendants Qian, Wang, and Zhang during the court trial and were sufficiently substantiated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Qian, Wang, and Zhang; statements from victims Yang Yi, Gao, and Meng; testimony from witness Yang Jia; forensic medical injury assessment documentation; identification records; arrest records, household registration proof, case handling descriptions, prior conviction records, and other evidence.", "label": {"Qian": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Huaibei City charges: From May 2013 to October 2013, the defendants Zhou and Zhu repeatedly committed theft of other's property in certain districts. Among them, Zhou was involved in 14 cases, with a total value of 14,473 RMB, while Zhu participated in 6 cases, with a total value of 5,723 RMB. To substantiate the above facts, the public prosecution provided the court with the following evidence: household registration certificates, the process of apprehension, seizure warrants, explanations, re-education through labor decisions, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release after serving sentences, and so on. Additionally, appraisal opinions, on-site investigation records, diagrams, photos, and identification records were provided along with testimonies from witnesses Cheng Moujia, Cheng Mouyi, Cai Mou, and others, and statements from victims Wang Moujia, Liang Mou, Li Mou, and others.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from early 2015 to April 2015, the defendant Hu and Chen jointly engaged in organizing prostitution. Initially, defendant Hu printed pornography cards containing a phone number meant for soliciting prostitution and distributed them by riding his electric scooter to hotels such as the Speed 8 Hotel on Baili Road and the Reiss Hotel on Nanpu Road. When clients called the phone number on the pornographic cards to indicate their interest in prostitution, defendant Chen or defendant Hu would negotiate the price with the clients and contact prostitutes like Long to go to the client's place for prostitution. The two defendants and the prostitutes would then split the proceeds among them according to prior agreements. Around 2:30 a.m. on March 18, 2015, defendant Chen received a phone call and arranged for the prostitute Long to go to room B405 at the Reiss Motor Inn on Nanpu Road to engage in prostitution with client Lin, collecting a fee of 400 yuan; at approximately 10:30 p.m. on April 10, 2015, defendant Hu received a phone call and arranged for the prostitute Long to go to room 8303 at the Speed 8 Hotel on Baili Dong Road to engage in prostitution with client Tang, also collecting a fee of 400 yuan. Subsequently, the two defendants together obtained a total of 300 yuan from the prostitution proceeds. The above facts were not disputed by defendant Hu and Chen during the court hearing, and were confirmed by testimonies from witnesses Long, Tang, and Lin, as well as evidence such as the process of arrest, photos of tools used in the crime, identification documents, criminal judgment, proof of release after serving a sentence, administrative penalty decision, seizure decision, seizure list, evidence retrieval list, call records, search warrants, statements of circumstances, personnel identification records, site identification records, location search records, surveillance videos, video screenshots, among others, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On June 4, 2016, at approximately 14:00, the defendants Sun and Zhong sold heroin to drug user Kong in their residence located at Unit 1, Room 101, Building 10, North District of Gongnong Village, Xigu District, in a certain city. Kong took a small portion of the purchased drug and gave it to Sun for consumption. Subsequently, when the drug user Kong attempted to leave Sun's residence with the drugs, he was apprehended. The police discovered a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.47 grams on Kong. Additionally, 300 yuan in gambling funds and a mobile phone used for committing the crime were found in the bag carried by the defendants. From defendant Sun, the police seized 0.08 grams of methamphetamine given by Kong for consumption and another mobile phone used for committing the crime. Furthermore, two packets of methamphetamine, totaling 3.8 grams, jointly purchased by defendants Sun and Zhong, were found in Sun’s home. Both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court, which, by law, could result in a lesser penalty. However, both defendants are repeat offenders, and Sun, in particular, is a repeat offender of drug crimes, warranting a severe penalty according to law. It is requested that the court impose a sentence according to the law. The defendants Sun and Zhong raised no objections to these facts during the trial. The case materials are substantiated by the evidence including the case filing registration, seizure decision, seizure list and photographs, physicochemical examination and identification report, testimony of witness Kong, confessions of defendants Sun and Zhong, call records, criminal judgment and release certificates, basic information form of permanent residents, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: At around 22:00 on March 25, 2015, the defendants Liang and Wu went to a certain location in the village of a certain town in a certain city and sold Liu two small packets of the drug tetrabenzylamphetamine (commonly known as \"methamphetamine\") for 200 yuan. Subsequently, the defendants Liang and Wu were apprehended on the spot, and two small packets of the drug methamphetamine, along with 200 yuan in drug money, were confiscated. After examination, the two small packets of suspicious substances weighed 1.43 grams net and were found to contain methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Liang and Wu during the court hearing. Along with the statements of the witness Liu, identification records, seizure lists, drug identification reports, defendants' identification of the drugs, drug money, and crime scene photographs, on-site urine test reports, on-site investigation records, on-site drawings and photos, the defendants' household registration information, and the details of their arrest, these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In March 2011, the defendants Huang and Zuo rented vacant land in a certain village, district, and city to set up a simple yuba (tofu skin) processing workshop, engaging in unlicensed production and sale of yuba. From early 2016 to May 2017, defendants Huang and Zuo, in order to ensure the yuba produced had a long shelf life, good color, and would sell well, consistently added non-food additives sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and borax (both substances listed in \"Non-Food Substances That Might Be Illegally Added to Food\") during processing and sold them on the market. On May 8, 2017, officers from the Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in a certain city conducted an inspection at the yuba processing factory operated by defendants Huang and Zuo, located at group one of a certain village in a certain district in a certain city (next to the newly built flood control embankment pumping station). During the inspection, they seized 18 rods of semi-finished yuba weighing a total of 200.3 pounds (after sampling and testing, all were found to contain sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and borax, with a test conclusion of non-compliance), as well as a bag of borax, a bag of sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, and processing equipment and other items.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zuo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: During the period from 2011 to 2015, the defendant Tao took advantage of his positions as the director of the Circuit Breaker Branch Factory, the manager, and the secretary of the Customer Service Center at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd. to illegally accept a total of 100,000 RMB from Lin, the general manager of Pingdingshan Huijuyuan Co., Ltd. This was in exchange for helping Lin's company win bids for outsourced labor services at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center, and providing assistance after winning the bid in securing contracts for on-site painting, repainting, secondary wiring, and timely settlement of labor payments. Tao used the 100,000 RMB for personal daily expenses. After the case was uncovered, the illicit money was returned. \n\nDuring the period from 2013 to 2014, the defendant Zhang, utilizing his position as the information section chief of the Customer Service Center at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd., illegally accepted 50,600 RMB and a 3,500 RMB shopping card from Lin, the general manager of Pingdingshan Huijuyuan Electrical Co., Ltd. This was in exchange for helping Lin's company secure more outsourced labor services for on-site painting, repainting, secondary wiring, and timely settlement of labor fees at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center. During the same period, Zhang also used his position to illegally accept 17,000 RMB and a 1,500 RMB shopping card from Guo, the project manager of Pingdingshan Beiyoute Electrical Co., Ltd. Zhang provided assistance to Guo's company for securing more outsourced labor services, such as on-site painting and repainting, at Pinggao Electric Co., Ltd.'s Customer Service Center and facilitated timely payment settlements. The total amount of 67,600 RMB and 5,000 RMB in shopping cards received by Zhang was used for his personal daily expenses. The prosecution presented related evidence in court.", "label": {"Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged the following: Defendants Tan and Hu are in a marital relationship. On February 26, 2014, defendant Tan impersonated victim An and activated a Bank of China Great Wall International Credit Card applied for by An. Tan then instructed Hu to use this card to withdraw a total of 5,000 yuan in cash from the Lichuan branch of the Agricultural Bank of China in three transactions. Subsequently, Hu used the credit card at the Lichuan Zhaosheng Technology and Trade Co., Ltd. Tianqiao business hall to purchase an Apple mobile phone worth 2,999 yuan. After the incident, defendants Tan and Hu turned themselves in to the public security authorities and returned 8,100 yuan in cash to victim An. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Hu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the statements of the victim; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; records of examination, inspection, identification, and investigative experiments; as well as audiovisual materials, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Leye County, in the Zhuang District of a certain place, charged that on June 7, 2014, at around 7 PM, the defendants Huang and Tian conspired together in the Mingling Auto Repair Shop located in the northern part of Leye County. Defendant Tian was responsible for covering, while Huang stole an Apple mobile phone placed on the computer desk in the shop, belonging to Huang Mingling, valued at 2,274 yuan. The stolen goods were pawned by Tian to Xie for a loan. After the incident, the stolen item was recovered and returned to the owner.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found: Wang and Zhao both built houses in Xiaohetou Village, a certain city. They are neighbors and had a dispute over the construction of a courtyard wall between their houses. On the morning of September 20, 2013, Wu (already sentenced), arranged by Wang, led the defendant Yuan and others to Wang's house to build the courtyard wall. Zhao's side discovered this and had a dispute with Wu and others. Around 11:00 AM the same day, while Wu was having lunch with Wang and others, he learned that Zhao's side had torn down part of the wall they had built. He then contacted the defendants Feng and Yuan and others to rush to the scene and requested Feng to handle the matter. Wu and Wang subsequently left the scene and arranged for Yuan (already sentenced) to drive his car to assist. The defendants Feng and Yuan then called upon Yin, Zhan, Xiao, and Zhu (handled in another case) to bring the machetes and steel pipes Yuan had prepared in advance to the scene and smashed Zhao's house windows, doors, and other property. According to the appraisal, the value of the loss was 24,997.00 yuan. On September 19, 2014, defendant Feng was administratively detained by the public security organ for drug use and providing gambling conditions, and was criminally detained on September 16 of the same year. On September 26, 2014, police, acting on a public tip-off, arrested defendant Yuan near Xiongji Dumpling Restaurant in Fuxin Community, Gulou Office, a certain city. It was also found that Wu, a co-defendant, compensated Zhao for all the losses. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Feng and Yuan during the trial and were evidenced by the testimony of co-defendants Wu, Zeng, and Yuan; statements from victim Zhao; witness statements from Wang, Zhou and others; the price appraisal conclusion by the Price Certification Center of the Municipal Bureau of Commodity Prices; the criminal judgment by the Municipal People's Court; the report of the Municipal Public Security Bureau on the incident; and the household registration certificates of defendants Feng and Yuan, sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 11 p.m. on November 9, 2014, the defendant Huang gathered the defendant Dai, along with Chen A, Chen B, and \"Little Someone\" (all handled in separate cases), and went to the victim You's home located at Room 2605, No.175 Yinghuang Lake, Hubin North Road, Siming District, a certain city, to demand a debt, but to no avail. At around 5 a.m. the next day, defendants Huang, Dai, and others returned to the above location. As the victim You refused to open the door again, defendant Huang called a locksmith to try to pry open the lock. When the locksmith arrived, he stopped attempting to unlock the door after noticing someone inside. Defendant Dai then took a hammer from the locksmith’s toolbox and smashed the security door and wooden door, forcing entry into the victim You's residence with Huang and others. The public security authorities, upon receiving a report from victim You, rushed to the scene and arrested defendants Huang and Dai on the spot. After the incident, defendants Huang and Dai compensated the victim for the relevant economic losses and obtained forgiveness. The above facts were confessed by defendants Huang and Dai during the court hearing, corroborated by their pre-trial confessions and defenses, the victim You's statement, testimonies of witnesses Chen A, Chen B, Zhou, and Fu, as well as photos of the damaged security and wooden doors, identification records, extraction records, evidence collection records, receipt of evidence list, house lease contract, debt acknowledgment letter, letter of forgiveness, residential status certificates of Huang and Dai, their criminal record inquiry explanation, the public security authorities' report of apprehension, case details, and legal documents of compulsory measures, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On January 1, 2014, defendants Huang and Meng conspired to cover for each other and jointly looked for opportunities to steal other people's property. At around 8:00 PM that day, the two followed the victim, Zeng Moujia, near Hongcheng Bus Station on Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, in this city. Meng stole a black Samsung I8250 phone from the pocket of Zeng Moujia's coat (valued at RMB 295 according to appraisal). After succeeding, Meng quickly transferred the phone to Huang. Subsequently, the two were caught red-handed by plainclothes police officers.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at approximately 22:00 on September 10, 2013, defendants Lei, Kong, and \"A\" (handled in a separate case) were drinking together at a grilled fish restaurant at the entrance of Jin Xiu New Village on Sanlian Road in the Longhua New District of a certain city. As they were about to leave, they happened to encounter the victim Tang and his colleague Yang walking by. Defendant Kong then reached out and touched Yang's face, which Yang blocked. Kong subsequently struck Yang on the back, causing Yang to shout. Victim Tang immediately stepped forward to stop defendant Kong, resulting in a physical altercation between the parties. Defendants Lei, Kong, and \"A\" then used fists, feet, and bricks to attack victims Tang and Yang, causing multiple injuries to Tang. After receiving Yang's report, police arrived at the scene and apprehended defendants Lei and Kong. According to the assessment, victim Tang sustained multiple soft tissue injuries throughout his body", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment"], "Kong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that the defendant Sha is the actual owner of a Liberation brand heavy box truck without a license plate (displayed at the time of the incident as B××××× from a certain locality). Sha illicitly changed the vehicle’s chassis number to match the chassis number of another truck with a license plate B××××× from a certain locality. On October 30, 2014, around 10:15 am, Sha instructed the defendant Wu to drive his unlicensed Liberation brand heavy truck (displayed at the time of the incident as B××××× from a certain locality) southbound along the Shenqiao line. When reaching 1km+905m on this line, due to Wu's speeding (exceeding the speed limit by 130%), the vehicle collided with an unlicensed hand-held tractor traveling eastward, driven without a license by Liu Moujia. This collision instantly resulted in the death of Liu Moubing, a passenger on the hand-held tractor. According to a forensic examination by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the victim Liu Moubing died due to severe cranial brain damage. The Traffic Police Brigade of a certain city determined that defendant Wu bears the main responsibility for this accident, Liu Moujia bears secondary responsibility, and Liu Moubing bears no responsibility. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, defendants Sha and Wu independently reached a civil settlement with the close relatives of the victim Liu Moubing, receiving their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defen", "label": {"Sha": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the accusation of the People's Procuratorate of a certain place, at around 11 a.m. on May 27, 2015, the defendants Xuan and Chen saw a blue Yamaha ladies' motorcycle unattended near the section of the road by the Xin Qiao Village Committee in Hengxian County, Hengzhou Town. Xuan proposed to Chen to steal the motorcycle, to which Chen agreed. Xuan then pried open and started the motorcycle, while Chen removed the license plate, and together they stole the motorcycle. Later, Xuan sold the stolen motorcycle to Mai for 1,000 yuan and gave Chen 300 yuan as his share. Subsequently, Mai lost the motorcycle while using it. According to the valuation by the Hengxian County Price Appraisal Center, the motorcycle involved was valued at 3,530 yuan. Furthermore, it was found that during compulsory detoxification, Xuan voluntarily confessed to the police about the criminal fact of stealing the motorcycle in this case together with Chen, which had not yet been discovered by the judicial authorities; Chen truthfully confessed the criminal facts of the case after being brought to justice. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xuan and Chen during the trial and were corroborated by evidence provided by the prosecution, including the statement of the victim Bi Daocang, the testimony of the witness Mai, the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the arrest process, household registration certificates, case handling explanations, lists of seizures and returns, administrative penalty decision, compulsory detoxification decision, the vehicle registration certificate, the price appraisal conclusion issued by the Hengxian County Price Appraisal Center, the on-site investigation transcript, site maps, site photos, and the confessions made by the defendants Xuan and Chen to the police, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Xuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from February 15, 2014, the defendants Chen and Ceng, in collusion with a co-defendant Meng (already sentenced), confined Wang, who had been deceived and brought to a suspected pyramid scheme group's rental house at No. 13, Fifth Alley, Datiandong, Jianggao Town, in a certain district of this city. They imposed the confinement by means such as monitoring, following, and confiscating his mobile phone. At around 11 a.m. on February 19, while Chen and the co-defendant Meng were taking Wang out for a class, Wang called for help to a passing police car, leading Meng to assault Wang. Subsequently, the police apprehended Meng and Chen and rescued Wang. At around 1 p.m., Ceng was arrested. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution read and presented evidence during the court trial, including the victim's statement, witness testimonies, inspection records, and confessions from the defendants. Based on the above facts and evidence,", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on May 2, 2014, at around 14:00, the defendants Yang and Chen, after premeditated discussion, proceeded to a certain alley beside the Guilin Zai Mong Kok Hair Salon on Donglong Road in a certain city's urban area. Yang served as a lookout while Chen went up and pried open the ignition lock and anti-theft lock of a black Hai Ai Ni brand Little Tortoise King model electric scooter parked there by Wu. Subsequently, Yang rode away with the scooter. Inside the seat box of the stolen scooter were two packs of True Dragon brand Haiyun cigarettes. After the crime, all stolen items were retrieved by the public security agency and returned to the owner, Wu. According to an appraisal by the price certification center of the local city, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,130 RMB, and the two packs of True Dragon brand Haiyun cigarettes valued at 1,000 RMB. Furthermore, it was found that defendant Yang was previously convicted of a crime and sentenced by this court to six months of imprisonment on October 9, 2005, and was released after serving the term on January 28, 2006. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Chen during the trial, and there are supporting evidence such as crime report forms, the process of arrest, photos identifying the scene, photos identifying stolen goods, photos identifying crime tools, site identification records, lists of seized items and documents, lists of returned items and documents, Wu's interrogation records, receipts, interrogation records of Yang and Chen, household registration proofs, sentence documents from Yuzhou District People's Court of a certain city [2005] Yufa Criminal First Instance No. 505, release certificate from the Second Detention Center of the city Yufa Second Release No. [2006] 42, relevant materials on Yang and Chen's compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation, and price appraisal conclusion document by the city's Price Certification Center Yujiad [2014] No. 241; adequate to substantiate the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On October 18, 2015, at around 3 a.m., the defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 75, a certain village in a certain county. Defendant Yu acted as a lookout outside while defendant Zhang used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 106 of Li. They stole a BBK X1ST mobile phone (valued at 607 RMB) and a BBK X5M mobile phone (valued at 1,569 RMB). 2. On October 18, 2015, at around 2 a.m., defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 256, a certain village in a certain town in a certain county. Defendant Yu stood lookout at the main entrance while defendant Zhang climbed over the wall to enter the courtyard and used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 101 of Ke. They stole a Huanyu MG500 mobile phone (valued at 283 RMB). 3. On November 12, 2015, at around 3 a.m., defendants Zhang and Yu went to No. 568, Xitou Village, a certain town in a certain county. Defendant Yu stood lookout at the alley entrance while defendant Zhang used a lock-picking technique to enter temporary residence Room 101 of a person named Zhang. They stole clothing and trousers placed by the bedside, searched through them, and then discarded them by the roadside outside. These items were later retrieved by Zhang. On January 19, 2016, defendants Zhang and Yu were apprehended by public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Yu during the trial. The case is corroborated by statements from victims Li, Ke, and Zhang; testimonies from witnesses Guo, Ge, and Liu; on-site inspection records; identification records; photographs; seizure decision documents; receipts; price appraisal reports; administrative penalty decisions; community drug rehabilitation orders; criminal judgment documents; certificates of release after serving sentences; and demographic information sheets. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that the defendants Luo and Li were originally employees of Futaihua Industrial (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.'s CSD Product Manufacturing Department (responsible for after-sales maintenance) under Foxconn Guanlan. Luo was the production line leader of the workshop, responsible for counting the overdue backlogged motherboards in the workshop and testing aspects such as temperature and color rendering. Li was the overdue backlog specialist of the same workshop assembly line, responsible for taking the overdue backlogged motherboards into the repair room for replacement. On February 11, 2014, defendants Luo and Li conspired to exploit management loopholes in the company to steal iPhone 4 motherboards from their factory workshop by using fake replacements. On February 13, 2014, around 10:00 AM, Luo prepared and purchased 60 fake iPhone 4 motherboards (costing 3,600 yuan) and handed them over to employee Li in the corner of the workshop. Li took advantage of that day's opportunity as there were many abnormally backlogged motherboards on the production line and replacement was relatively smooth, and exchanged the fake motherboards for 60 genuine iPhone 4 motherboards under the pretext of the devices not powering up, handing over the genuine motherboards to Luo. Afterwards, Luo sold the 60 genuine motherboards for a profit of 20,000 yuan, with Li receiving 6,500 yuan and Luo receiving 13,500 yuan. According to the victim company's quotation, the unit price of each motherboard is 388.71 yuan, and the motherboards involved in the case amount to a total of 23,322.60 yuan. On April 10, 2014, defendant Li was arrested; on May 10, 2014, defendant Luo voluntarily surrendered to the police. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Li during the trial, and are supported by related evidence verified during the trial, which is sufficient to confirm them. Regarding the civil compensation part of this case, under the mediation hosted by this court, defendant Luo compensated the victim unit with 22,000 yuan, and Li compensated with 14,500 yuan, with the relevant payments made by the defendants' families. The victim unit forgave the two defendants.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that on January 7, 2019, at approximately 6:38 am, the defendant Li was driving a small sedan with the license plate XXX, traveling north on the high-level road from south. Upon reaching a village intersection, he collided with pedestrian Niu, who was crossing the road from east to west, causing Niu to fall onto the road. After getting out of the car to assess the situation, Li did not move the injured party to a safe location and immediately drove away from the accident scene. Later, the defendant Wu, driving another small sedan with the license plate XXX in the same direction, collided with Niu, who was half-sitting on the road from the previous accident. After checking the situation, Wu fled the scene. Subsequently, vehicles driven by Shan and Li1, who were traveling in the same direction, ran over Niu and left the accident scene, leading to Niu's death due to the traffic accident. Wang, driving another small sedan with the license plate XXX, passed the accident scene. According to the appraisal: Niu died from craniocerebral injury combined with chest and abdominal organ damage accompanied by traumatic shock. The Traffic Police Brigade No. 3, under the Public Security Bureau of the city, determined: Li bore the main responsibility for the accident; Wu bore the main responsibility; Shan bore secondary responsibility; Li1 bore secondary responsibility; Wang and Niu bore no responsibility. The prosecuting authority presented related ", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on November 25, 2013, at approximately 02:00, the defendants Liu, Zhao, and the criminal suspects \"Hei Gui\" and Huang (the latter two's specific information is unknown and are handled in separate cases) arrived by car at the Xiaoxiangyuan Restaurant on Gongming Street, Guangming District, of a certain city, after premeditation. They pried open the lock of the restaurant door and entered to steal one 55-inch Konka LCD TV, six 37-inch Skyworth LCD TVs, two computer hosts, and more than 300 yuan in cash before fleeing the scene by car. The four later sold the stolen goods and shared the proceeds. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen six Skyworth TVs was 7,992 yuan RMB, and the prices of other items could not be appraised. On December 5, 2013, after investigation, the public security organs arrested defendant Zhao at a certain location. With Zhao's cooperation, they subsequently arrested defendant Liu and seized a hydraulic cutter, a large pair of scissors, and a screwdriver. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Liu and Zhao during the trial, and there is relevant evidence that has been verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the evening of August 5, 2020, the defendant Zhang received a text message from drug user Wu to purchase drugs. He discussed with defendants Ling and Sheng about obtaining drugs for sale. After receiving a 500 yuan WeChat transfer from Wu, Zhang paid Sheng 300 yuan to purchase drugs, and Zhang and Ling each took a share of 100 yuan from the remaining 200 yuan. Around 9 p.m. that evening, defendant Sheng obtained two tablets of methamphetamine (commonly known as \"magu\") and a small bag of methamphetamine (ice) from \"Big Brother\" (identity details unknown, not present in the case) and handed them over to Zhang. Zhang felt the ice was insufficient, so Ling gave Zhang approximately 0.2 grams of his own ice. After receiving an additional 50 yuan \"travel fee\" via WeChat transfer from Wu, Zhang hurried to a certain parking lot in a specific district of the city to transact drugs with Wu, where he was caught by investigators. The police lawfully seized 1.5 red round tablets (net weight 0.15 grams) and a bag of white crystals (net weight 0.39 grams) from Zhang. According to the forensic identification by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of a city’s Public Security Bureau, the seized red round tablets and white crystalline substances were found to contain methamphetamine components. After Zhang came into custody, he cooperated with the public security agency in arresting accomplices Ling and Sheng. Upon arrest, the three defendants voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their criminal facts. It was also found that defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng confessed and accepted punishment at the investigative agency, and during the review and prosecution period, they voluntarily confessed and accepted punishment, signing a confession and punishment agreement with the assistance of duty lawyers. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng during the court trial. They are supported by evidence including demographic information, the case detection process, inspection transcripts, a list of seized items, drug photos, weigh-in records of suspected drugs, sampling records, WeChat transfer records, confession and punishment agreements, statements and defenses of defendants Zhang, Ling, and Sheng, physical evidence test reports, and identification transcripts, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ling": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Based on the trial findings, on March 27, 2016, around 20:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district of a city. They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a white Yongjiu brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Jia, which was parked there (valued at 2160 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 7 of the same year, around 18:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a supermarket at Lotz Plaza, Shiqi Street, in a certain district (currently a certain supermarket). They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a red Philips brand electric bicycle and a blue Mulan brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Yi, which were parked there (valued at 700 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 20 of the same year, around 19:00, the defendants Zou and Yu went to the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district. They used their hands to pry open the headlock and stole a green Huanqiao brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Cheng, which was parked there (valued at 400 RMB according to the appraisal). The stolen goods were sold, and the proceeds were spent. On April 28 of the same year, around 23:00, the defendants Zou and Yu were discovered and apprehended by patrol officers while stealing a black electric bicycle at the entrance of a bookstore at Chengnan Mansion, Shiqi Street, in a certain district.\n\nThe above facts were not disputed by the defendants Zou and Yu during the court trial. Additionally, they are confirmed by the statements of the victims Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and Cheng, as well as the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Yin, identification records and photos, the valuation report from the Price Appraisal Center of a certain district, the circumstances of the arrest, explanatory notes, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on June 17, 2015, at around 4 a.m., the defendants Tang and Zhao, after premeditation, went to the courtyard below Building No. 8, Liuhe Road, Qixing Village, Qixing District of a certain city. Tang used a key he was carrying to unlock and steal a black Hanling brand electric bike, which Yang had parked in the courtyard. This vehicle was stolen property belonging to Fu, valued at 986 RMB according to an appraisal. Tang then waited with the vehicle, while Zhao entered the room on the first floor of Building No. 8, where Yang's mother lived, and stole a black Sansui television, valued at 684 RMB according to an appraisal. After committing the theft, they fled the scene and were apprehended by the police near Dongjiang Primary School in Qixing District. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Tang and Zhao during the trial. There is additional evidence including Zhao's household registration certificate, the details of their capture, purchase receipts for the stolen items, criminal judgments from Qixing District People's Court under references (2013) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 112, (2013) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 162, and (2014) Xing Xing Chu Zi No. 254, a release certificate, the victims Yang and Fu's reports and statements, confessions from defendants Tang and Zhao, a valuation report from the municipal pricing center regarding the items involved under reference (2015) 7-3, a notification of appraisal opinions, site identification records and photos of the crime scene and stolen goods by both defendants, a record and photos of Tang identifying Zhao, a scene layout plan, a seizure list, and a return list. This evidence is sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On February 22, 2014, at approximately 11 p.m., defendants Yuan and Wang, along with Zhang, Tan, and Chen (the latter three to be tried in separate cases), conspired to find a passerby to assault and rob of some property. Later, Yuan, Wang, and the others followed the victims Huang and Xu (both minors) to the east side of a certain building in Hecheng Subdistrict, a district of a certain city, and attacked Huang and Xu with fists, feet, and wooden sticks, robbing Huang of a Balong BL-A10D mobile phone (valued at 441 RMB). Subsequently, Yuan, Wang, and the other three fled the scene and handed the stolen goods to Chen to sell. Chen sold the goods for 100 RMB and kept the proceeds for himself. After the case was solved, the police recovered the stolen goods and returned them to the victims, but the money Chen obtained had already been spent and could not be recovered. In court, the prosecution provided the confessions and defenses of defendants Yuan and Wang, identification records, statements from the victims Huang and Xu, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Chen, Li, and another person named Li, Price Appraisal Conclusion Document No. (2014)00089 concerning the involved property, a forensic medical assessment document from Fo [a certain bureau] No. (2014)072 on the degree of human injury, household registration certificates of the defendants and victims Huang and Xu, a detention order, a list of seized items and photos, a report on the arrest process, and an explanation issued by Hecheng Police Station, Gaoming Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, among other evidence.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on March 2, 2014, at around 16:00, the defendants Lin and He went to the intersection of Zhongnan Road and Qianwei Road in Laibin City. He blocked the victim Zeng’s view while Lin used tweezers to reach into the right pocket of Zeng's clothing from behind and clipped out a black OPPO brand bar touchscreen cellphone. After Lin and He successfully stole the phone, they were caught on the spot by the police. According to the appraisal, the value of the stolen cellphone was 3,298 RMB. To support the charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence to the court.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charges: At around 0:30 on August 21, 2015, defendants Wang and Yu, along with others, were singing in room B08 on the second floor of Mango KTV on Yuhe Road in Kuiwen District after drinking alcohol. Due to a conflict between Wang and another person, he had Yu call Zhuang and Han to the scene. After the defendants Zhuang and Han arrived under the influence of alcohol, Han unreasonably smashed items such as the lottery stand and computer monitors at the entrance of the store’s supermarket. Subsequently, the defendants Zhuang, Wang, Yu, and Han unreasonably assaulted Mango KTV manager Liu and supervisor Lu, resulting in soft tissue contusions for both injured parties. According to an assessment, the injuries of victims Liu and Lu were classified as minor injuries. Following the incident, defendant Han compensated Mango KTV with 20,000 yuan, after which Mango KTV no longer pursued legal action against him and applied for a lenient treatment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the court hearing and are substantiated with documentary evidence such as arrest and case-solving reports, household registration certificates, telephone records, criminal judgments from a certain city's district People's Court (2010) Criminal First Instance No. 42, (2014) Criminal First Instance No. 19, and the High-tech Industrial Development Zone People's Court (2015) Criminal First Instance No. 15, and applications; statements from victims Liu and Lu; forensic evaluation reports from the Criminal Science and Technology Office of the Kuiwen Branch of the Public Security Bureau (Weifang) Public (Kui) Forensic (Injury) Certificate No. 290, 291 of 2015; identification records, on-site inspection records, audio-visual materials, and on-site surveillance videos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained: On January 10, 2017, at around 19:00, defendants Zhu and Wu rode a motorcycle, carrying tools such as a headlamp, music player, small net, and rubber band, to Jingting Village, Jinji Town, Tianchang City, in the Jinzhang Team. In three ponds belonging to the Jinzhang Team, they illegally hunted 20 wild birds. That evening, defendants Zhu and Wu were apprehended by public security authorities. Following the incident, an assessment conducted by the Dongying Branch of the State Forestry Administration's Forensic Authentication Center for Forest Public Security, determined that the birds captured were Moorhens, which are terrestrial wild animals protected by the state due to their significant ecological, scientific, and social value, classified as \"three have\" animals. On January 12, 2017, the 20 Moorhens (alive) were released. The defendants Zhu and Wu raised no objection to the above facts during the trial, which were corroborated by evidence such as identification records, site photos, on-site investigation records, site location maps, seizure lists and photos, appraisal reports, the Tianchang Municipal Government's announcement prohibiting the hunting of wild animals within the city, case transfer notifications, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decisions, household registration information, explanations on the handling of the birds involved, explanations on the situation of arrival, and statements from defendants Zhu and Wu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Fine"], "Wu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the evening of December 12, 2016, the defendant Zhang drove a van with the license plate Su H×××××, in collusion with the defendants Dong and Yang, to San Zhong Road in a village in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city to steal cable. The defendant Yang used pliers to cut the cables of China Mobile Tietong Co., Ltd.'s Huaian branch located near San Zhong Road. The defendants Zhang and Dong wound up the cut cables and loaded them onto the vehicle. The three defendants stole a total of 270 meters of cable. That same evening, the defendants Zhang, Dong, and Yang sold the stolen cables to Zhang1 (handled in a separate case), who runs a scrap recycling station, for more than 6,100 RMB. Each of the defendants Zhang, Yang, and Dong received 2,000 RMB. The appraisal determined the stolen cables were valued at 7,871 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang was apprehended on January 23, 2017. After being brought to justice, he truthfully confessed to the crime and successfully persuaded Yang and Dong to voluntarily surrender by phone. Defendants Yang and Dong voluntarily surrendered on January 23, 2017, and January 24, 2017, respectively, and truthfully confessed to the crime. Furthermore, during the trial at this court, defendants Zhang, Yang, and Dong have already returned all the stolen funds. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Zhang, and Dong during the court hearings and were substantiated by the statements of the victims Zhou, Jin, and Li, the written testimonies of the absentee witnesses Tang and Zhang1, the price assessment conclusion provided by the Price Certification Branch of the District Price Bureau, recognizance records, the criminal judgment, the case report, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of the Guangxi Autonomous Region charges that: On August 30, 2014, at around 5 p.m., defendants Peng and Luo, after conspiring, with Luo registering a room, number 803, at a hotel on a certain street in a certain district of a certain city, using the identity of \"Feng\", and with Peng inviting the victim, Chen, into the room, fabricated an identity situation to gain Chen's trust. Subsequently, Peng and Luo pretended to play poker and gamble. After Peng intentionally lost money to Luo, Peng, on the pretense of borrowing money from Chen to continue gambling, deceived Chen out of 20,000 yuan in cash, after which both Peng and Luo fled the scene. The illicit gains were squandered jointly. Following the victim's report, on September 23, 2014, the public security organ apprehended defendant Peng on train K849. Through an online wanted notice, on October 12, 2014, at around 6 p.m., the public security organ apprehended defendant Luo at a certain location in Liunan District of a certain city. After the incident, Peng's family compensated the victim for the economic loss of 20,000 yuan and obtained the victim's understanding. Regarding the above facts, defendants Peng and Luo raised no objections during the trial, and the following evidence was presented in court, verified, and confirmed: the case registration form, the case filing decision, the confessions of defendants Peng and Luo, the statement of victim Chen, the identification record by victim Chen, the identification records and photos pointed out by defendants Peng and Luo, the evidence retrieval list, the hotel accommodation settlement slip, the guest accommodation registration form, the delivery slip, the history detail list of the Peony Ling Tong Card account, the process of arrest and apprehension, the receipt, the letter of understanding, and the household registration certificates of defendants Peng and Luo.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the night of March 4, 2017, Wu (full name unknown) had an argument with Chen over trivial matters, after which Wu informed her boyfriend Liu. On March 5 of the same year, defendants Liu, Gao, and Hu A (dealt with in a separate case), among others, decided to go to the \"Qinyuan\" foot massage located on Jiangyuan Street in the Duting Subdistrict Office of Lichuan City to cause trouble for Chen. Since Chen was not present at the shop, they called the victims Xiong and Xiang to handle the matter. After Xiong and Xiang arrived at the shop, an altercation ensued with Liu, Gao, and Hu, which led to both parties physically assaulting each other. Defendant Liu took a kitchen knife from the \"Zhijian\" duck restaurant kitchen and struck Xiang on the left side of the waist, while Gao drove a car into Xiong, knocking him to the ground. According to the assessment, Xiang's injuries were classified as second-degree minor injuries, and Xiong's injuries were classified as slight injuries. It was further found that during the trial, with mediation hosted by the People's Mediation Committee of the Duting Subdistrict Office in Lichuan City, defendants Liu and Gao reached a mediation agreement with victims Xiong and Xiang. Liu compensated Xiang for a total of 50,000 RMB for various economic losses, and Gao compensated Xiong for a total of 10,000 RMB for various economic losses. Both victims issued letters of understanding, forgiving the two defendants. The above facts, to which defendants Liu and Gao raised no objections during the trial, are substantiated by documentary evidence; witness testimony; victim statements, expert opinions; site inspection records, and confessions and defense statements by the defendants, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On April 19, 2011, at around 11 PM, Zuo and others went to the Xinghuabang Yimen Mutton Soup Restaurant in Group 3 of a certain village in Liangzhu Town, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City. They demanded a benefit fee of 500 yuan from the restaurant owner, Feng, and after being refused, they stirred up trouble, which led to them being chased and attacked by Feng's side. Zuo called for help from fellow townspeople. Defendants Cao, Xia, as well as He, Hu B, Ji (all of whom have been sentenced) and others, upon hearing the news, arrived at the scene with sticks, shovels, and other implements to participate in the fight. Defendant Cao kicked the rolling shutter door of the mutton soup restaurant and, together with Xia, He, Hu B, and others, chased and attacked the victims Feng and Suo, causing multiple external injuries to their bodies, and also accidentally injuring passers-by Hu A and Zhou. Defendant Cao also accidentally struck Chen with a wooden stick. According to forensic evaluation by the Yuhang District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau: the injuries to victim Feng constitute minor injuries, and the injuries to victim Suo constitute slight injuries. After the incident, the relatives of He and Hu B reached a compensation agreement with the victims and have already paid the compensation. The evidence used for the charges includes the victim's statements, witness testimonies, a list of seized items, forensic injury assessment reports, on-site inspection records, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants and co-perpetrators.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On December 10, 2015, at around 20:20, the defendant Qin arranged for the defendant Liu to sell to Yang 10 tablets of methamphetamine (commonly known as \"magu,\" with a net weight of 0.84 grams) and a bag of methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice,\" with a net weight of 0.22 grams) in the corridor of the third floor of the Xinya Hotel on Hongda Road in this city, for 500 yuan in drug money. After the transaction, Liu and Qin were immediately apprehended by police officers. The prosecution submitted to this court evidence including witness testimonies accusing the defendants Qin and Liu of committing the crime of x; records of the arrest, drug weighing records, call logs, on-site test reports, identification transcripts; appraisal reports; household registration information and confessions and defenses of the defendants Qin and Liu.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On a day in mid-October 2012, at around 1 a.m., the defendant Yang took advantage of his convenience working at a club in Nanxun Town, Nanxun District of this city, and stole the master key to the club's lockers from the cash register. Later, with Wang (handled in a separate case) acting as a lookout, the defendant Yang used the key to open the locker door and stole 3,500 RMB in cash from the victim Ding stored in the locker. Subsequently, the defendant Yang received 2,500 RMB, and Wang received 1,000 RMB. On December 23, 2012, around 10 p.m., the defendant Yang contacted the defendant Wang by phone to commit theft and provided the master key to the lockers to the defendant Wang. Yang acted as a lookout while Wang used the key to open the locker door and stole the 20,000 RMB cash placed by the victim Zhang in the locker. Thereafter, the defendant Yang received 11,900 RMB, and the defendant Wang received 8,100 RMB. In summary, the defendant Yang was involved in two thefts, totaling 23,500 RMB, and the defendant Wang was involved in one theft, totaling 20,000 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Wang during the court trial and were corroborated by Wang's confession in the same case, statements from the victims Ding and Zhang, testimonies from witnesses Xia and He, an administrative penalty decision, identification records and photos, on-site investigation records, details of the arrest process, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From December 2012 to February 2013, the defendant Hu, along with others (identities unknown), placed a gambling machine capable of serving six people simultaneously (commonly known as a \"little fish machine\") in their own discount supermarket in a certain town for others to gamble. During this period, minors were also involved in gambling. Hu and her husband Wang jointly operated and managed the machine, making a total profit of over 10,000 yuan, of which defendants Hu and Wang each received over 4,000 yuan. It was further found that the two defendants voluntarily surrendered to the Xinmaqiao Police Station of Guzhen County Public Security Bureau on February 20, 2014, and returned the illegal gains of 4,000 yuan to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial and are corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Guo and Zhang, among others, the criminal case on-site investigation and inspection records from the Guzhen County Public Security Bureau, site diagrams, on-site photos, identification records, household registration certificates, explanatory notes, and evidence of the incident and arrest process, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the evening of March 5, 2015, defendants Xu and Huang, along with others, had a dispute with the victim Xing and others over a toast at the \"To Youth\" bar in Wanda Plaza, Wanzhou District, a certain city. The parties intended to fight but were dissuaded by the bar owner. Subsequently, around midnight on March 6, defendants Xu and Huang invited \"Er Tong\" and others to join them in carrying knives to find victims Xing and others near the \"Wuxi Specialty Products\" storefront at 262 Beishan Road, Wanzhou District, the city in question. Xing, Gong, and others sensed danger and hid in the alley beside the \"Wuxi Specialty Products\" storefront, closing the rolling door. Defendant Huang drove an off-road motorcycle to crash open the rolling door. Defendants Xu, Huang, and others brought a case of empty beer bottles from the \"Good K\" barbecue place and threw them at Xing and others, injuring Xing's face. According to the assessment, the injury sustained by victim Xing is classified as minor injury level two.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 10 a.m. on March 26, 2014, the defendants Wu and Peng rode a motorcycle to the vicinity of the \"Zhonghai City Garden\" residential area on Qianjiang Road in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain city. Defendant Wu drove the motorcycle close to pedestrian Nie, while defendant Peng, sitting on the back seat of the motorcycle, grabbed a \"Honggu\" brand blue satchel from Nie when he was off guard. The bag contained an Apple 4S phone valued at 2,162 yuan and 6,500 yuan in cash. After the crime, the blue satchel was recovered and returned to Nie. It was also found that Wu's family had compensated the victim Nie with 10,000 yuan in cash on Wu's behalf, and obtained Nie's forgiveness. Both defendants raised no objections during the trial and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. During the trial, Wu's defender presented the following arguments: 1. Defendant Wu was an accomplice in the joint crime; 2. Defendant Wu demonstrated a good attitude towards admitting guilt. It is suggested that the court should consider lenient punishment. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence, including the household registration certificates of the two defendants and their confessions at the public security agency, photos of the crime tools, the victim Nie's statement, the on-site identification record, search records, a list of seized and returned items, the appraisal conclusion of the value of the involved items, Peng's past criminal records, and the arrest process provided by the public security agency, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that the defendants, Chen and Xia, conspired with Ding and Li (both at large) to steal crude oil from the Second Mine of the Eighth Oil Extraction Plant by drilling holes and installing valves to damage the oil pipeline. On the nights of September 2 and 3, 2020, the aforementioned four individuals twice drilled holes and installed valves on the main oil return pipeline outside the Fourth Oil Extraction Team of the Second Mine of the Eighth Oil Extraction Plant within the jurisdiction of a town in a certain city. They attached a clamp to the oil pipeline, opened the ball valve, and drilled through the pipeline before leaving. Around 21:00 on September 7, the four conspiring with Ke (whose identity is yet to be verified) returned to the location of the installed valve to steal crude oil again. Defendant Xia was responsible for filling oil bags, Chen and Ke were responsible for loading the vehicle, while Ding and Li were responsible for transporting the 20 bags of stolen crude oil away from the scene. Chen and Xia were caught at the theft site by oilfield security personnel and were handed over to the public security authorities. A total of 21 bags of crude oil were seized on-site, with 20 bags being transported away; each bag weighed approximately 50 kilograms, totaling about 2 tons of crude oil valued at over 5,000 yuan.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city, Hunan Province charges: On April 16, 2015, at around 16:00, the defendants Xu and Ding, after conspiring, went to the vicinity of the bus stop opposite Emerald Bay in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Xu took the opportunity while the victim, Yang Mouyi, was walking unprepared and snatched away a gold necklace weighing 17.895 grams worth 5,100 yuan from around Yang's neck. They then fled the scene on a motorcycle driven by defendant Ding, who was waiting nearby. It was further found that the injuries suffered by the victim, Yang Mouyi, were assessed as minor injuries. The defendants Xu and Ding raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings. The facts are substantiated by documentary evidence including household registration certificates, arrest records, seizure warrants, seized items, inventory lists, a jewelry quality guarantee from Zhang Moumou, the criminal judgment of this court (2012) Huaihe Criminal Preliminary No. 220, the criminal judgment of Hangzhou Xiaoshan District People's Court (2007) Xiaoxingchu No. 1419, the testimony of witness Yang Moujia (a minor), the victim Yang Mouyi's statement, the defendants Xu and Ding's confessions and defenses, the forensic evaluation opinion on human injury degree by the public security bureau of a certain city, the price assessment opinion by a certain city Hecheng Price Certification Center, extraction records, inspection records, on-site identification records, on-site survey records, on-site layout sketches, and photos, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: From the end of 2014 to February 2015, \"Boss Lin\" (handled in a separate case) employed the defendants Wen, Zhuang, Zhan, and Chen in a logistics warehouse located at 41-43, East Block, 1st Floor, Lianhe Street, Chang'an Street, in a certain district of a certain city, to jointly engage in the illegal transportation, packaging, handling, and sales of cigarettes branded exclusively for export, without obtaining the \"Special Tobacco Monopoly Business Enterprise License\" from the tobacco monopoly department. Defendant Wen was responsible for driving vehicles for transportation; defendants Zhuang, Zhan, and Chen were responsible for packaging, handling, and accompanying the vehicles. On the afternoon of February 5, 2015, the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Brigade of the Sub-Bureau of a certain city's Public Security Bureau and the city’s Tobacco Monopoly Bureau inspectors seized the aforementioned warehouse. They confiscated on site 2,468 cartons of Yellow Crane Tower brand cigarettes (soft pack), 449 cartons of Yunyan brand cigarettes (soft pack), 1,149 cartons of Double Happiness brand cigarettes (hard pack), 4,125 cartons of Hongtashan brand (Gold) cigarettes (hard pack), and 899 cartons of Hongtashan brand cigarettes (hard pack). (According to identification, all the aforementioned seized cigarettes are export-only brands and are genuine, with a total value of RMB 1,114,434) as well as three vehicles involved in the case.", "label": {"Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that: On October 15, 2011, at around 12:00 PM, defendants Ye and Gao, at the entrance of Unit 4, Building 27, Kaiyuan Community, Jiaochuan Street, in this district, used means such as pushing a cart to steal a \"Lvyuan\" brand TDP0412Z model electric bicycle parked there by the victim Lü, valued at 960 RMB. On October 24, 2011, at around 4:00 PM, defendants Ye and Gao, together with Li A (handled in a separate case), near the Xingshan Vehicle Advertising Sign on the east side of Yufan East Road, Jiaochuan Street in this district, used the aforementioned methods to steal a \"Jinan Qingqi\" brand electric bicycle parked there by Hou, valued at 1960 RMB. After the crime, the public security organs recovered the aforementioned \"Jinan Qingqi\" brand electric bicycle. Defendants Ye and Gao compensated a total of 960 RMB, and the stolen property was returned to the victims. During the court trial, defendants Ye and Gao had no objection to the aforementioned facts, which were also corroborated by documentary evidence such as the identity proof of the defendants, the process of their arrest, explanatory notes, stolen property reports, temporary detention receipts, temporary item detention receipts, the return of items, document lists, photo descriptions, criminal judgment documents, release certificates, administrative punishment decisions, identification transcripts, witness testimonies of Hou and Li, victim Lü's statement, the confession of co-defendant Li A, and the price appraisal conclusion, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on October 4, 2013, defendants Cao and Zhao, in order to collect a debt, drove a white van and illegally restricted the personal freedom of a person named Li for approximately 17 hours. They handcuffed Li in the vehicle. At around 5 p.m. the following day, the two defendants released Li at Hongnan Society Bridge in this city. The prosecution presented to the court evidence such as the victim's statement and report materials, documentary evidence, witness testimony, and the confessions of the defendants to support the above allegations.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: In the mid to late June of 2016, after defendants Wu and Zhang conspired together, they repeatedly organized gambling activities using \"Tong Bao\" gambling apparatus in the kitchens of the houses of Ye's family at No. 54 Guoxiliao, a certain village in a certain town of a certain city, and Chen's family in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city. Through these activities, Wu gained more than 700 RMB in profits, and Zhang gained 1,100 RMB. On June 28, 2016, the public security bureau of the city raided the casino, lawfully seizing 13,985 RMB in gambling funds and one \"Tong Bao\" gambling apparatus. On the same day, June 28, 2016, defendants Wu and Zhang were captured by police officers. The illicit funds of 10,172 RMB seized from Wu and Zhang and one \"Tong Bao\" gambling apparatus were not transferred with the case. During court proceedings, defendants Wu and Zhang did not object to the above facts, which are further validated by the following evidence presented and cross-examined by the prosecuting agency and confirmed for legality, authenticity, and relevance by this court: 1. Testimonies of witnesses Xu, Xiao, Liao, Su, Yang, Chen, Ye, among others; 2. Inspection records, evidence preservation orders, evidence preservation inventory lists, photographs of the seized scene and items; 3. Documentary evidence including household registration certificates, basic personnel information, records of the case progress, illegal and criminal history investigation forms, administrative penalty decisions, and lists of confiscated items; 4. Identification records, on-site identification records, and photographs; 5. Confessions of defendants Wu and Zhang. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on March 31, 2017, the defendant Song, through the mediation of the defendant Jia, sold 5 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Zhou for a price of 3,000 yuan, making a profit from it. In support of the above accusation, the prosecution provided evidence such as witness testimony, identification records, documentary evidence, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on December 23, 2015, at around 11 a.m., the defendants Liu and Xie took advantage of a moment when no one was paying attention to steal 3,000 yuan in cash from the pocket of a coat belonging to the victim, He, which was placed on the back of a chair in the lobby of the Crescent Restaurant at Hexin Plaza, Shishan Town, in a particular district of a certain city. Liu was responsible for pretending to be a customer sipping tea, approaching the victim, and stealing the property, while Xie was responsible for acting as a lookout at the restaurant entrance. On January 22, 2016, the police arrested Liu and Xie at the aforementioned restaurant. In support of the charges, the prosecution presented relevant evidence in court, proving that the actions of both defendants violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for X crime. Since both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes, they should be punished according to Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The defendants did not object to the prosecution's charges. After trial, it was found that the prosecution's charges against Liu and Xie for theft were clear, with definitive and sufficient evidence, which is confirmed by this court.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After hearing the case, it was found that: On the afternoon of January 31, 2015, defendants Luo and Guo, in order to raise funds for drugs, traveled by coach from a town in a certain city to a certain district to look for opportunities to steal a motorcycle. At about 9:40 PM that night, the two defendants came out from the \"Horizon\" Internet cafe located on Jiaotong Road in Jianchang Town, a certain county, and noticed a red Guowei brand men's motorcycle belonging to the victim He parked at the entrance. The two defendants then used a key to unlock the ground lock of the motorcycle, broke the handle lock, pushed the motorcycle to a nearby residential area, connected the power line, started the motorcycle, and rode it back to a certain town. Afterwards, the two defendants sold the motorcycle and divided the proceeds equally. According to the appraisal, the stolen Guowei brand motorcycle was valued at 3,485 RMB. On September 18, 2015, during the investigation of He's stolen motorcycle case, the criminal investigation brigade of a certain county's public security bureau found that Luo, who was serving a sentence in a county detention center, and Guo, who was serving a sentence in a city detention center, were suspected in the case, and lawfully detained the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo and Guo during the court hearing, and were supported by the confessions and defenses of the two defendants; the statement of the victim He; the testimony of witness Tu; the appraisal opinion; surveillance video; identification records and video screenshots; the course of the case, household registration certificates, criminal judgment, and motorcycle sales receipts, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tianhe District in a certain city charged that defendants Wu and Zhang, in order to obtain illegal profits, collaborated with others to manufacture and process counterfeit and substandard cigarettes of brands such as \"Yuxi\" and \"Huanghelou\" without the permission of the registered trademark owners. This occurred at No. 104, 33 Wuxianqiao Zhijie, Tianhe District. On June 13, 2013, Wu and Zhang were caught red-handed at the aforementioned location. Seized at the scene were 149 cartons of soft-pack Yuxi cigarettes, 19 cartons of soft-pack Huanghelou (Lundao) cigarettes, 5 cartons of hard-pack Huanghelou (Mantianyou) cigarettes, 10,000 Yuxi brand cigarettes, 10,000 Yunyan brand cigarettes (all appraised as counterfeit registered trademark products and substandard cigarettes, with a total value of 54,608 RMB), along with tools used for the crime including one simple sealing machine, three electric irons, and two square wooden blocks.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendants Xu and Han, together with Mao (who has been approved for arrest and is on the run) and \"Yao\" (who is absconding with a case against them), conspired to defraud through marriage. In September 2012, they defrauded Gao of cash and goods amounting to 33,827 yuan and provided related evidence.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the Xiaomi letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 8911270, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from July 7, 2012, to July 6, 2022. The VIVO letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 9773708, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from September 21, 2012, to September 20, 2022. The HUAWEI letter trademark is registered under trademark certificate number 4924862, approved for use on goods in category 9, including mobile phones, with the authorized use period from September 7, 2008, to September 6, 2018. Yu Jiashan (handled in a separate case) established Bada Century Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain city on May 14, 2014, leasing the 6th floor of Building F, 10 Hua Feng Technology Park, Tangwei Community, Fuyong Street, Bao'an District, as a factory, organizing workers to produce counterfeit mobile phone screen assemblies with trademarks such as Xiaomi, BBK, and Huawei. Defendant Chen served as the factory director and defendant Lu as the finance director at the company. At around 16:00 on November 19, 2015, the police conducted a raid on the 6th floor of Building F, 10 Hua Feng Technology Park, Bada Century Technology Co., Ltd., at Fuyong Street, Bao'an District. In the company's office financial room, they seized 550 pieces of Huawei \"HUAWEI\" mobile phone touch screens (TP). Subsequently, the police seized 3,750 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (assembly) with Xiaomi logo, 2,465 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), 847 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (assembly) with VIVO logo, 248 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), 263 pieces of mobile phone touch screens assembly with Huawei \"HUAWEI\" logo, 650 pieces of mobile phone touch screens (TP), and 42 account books in a warehouse in room 3, first floor, Building 4, Hua Feng Technology Park. On the same day, Chen and Lu were arrested. An appraisal determined that the involved mobile phone screen assemblies were valued at 1,983,267 RMB.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on February 1, 2014, defendants Qian and Dan, after prior consultation and with the purpose of illegal profit, engaged in gambling activities. Defendant Dan was responsible for renting the venue and purchasing gambling supplies, while defendant Qian handled daily management. They organized multiple participants, including Yu, Kong, Chen Jia, and Liao, among others, to gamble using \"dianqiao\" method in a warehouse at the entrance of a village in a town of a district in a certain city. During these gambling activities, Qian and Dan took commissions in the form of \"500 yuan from every 10,000 yuan won,\" organizing gambling sessions dozens of times. On March 8, 2014, defendant Dan withdrew from the cooperation, by which time the two defendants had gained illegal profits amounting to over RMB 13,000. On March 12, 2014, at around 21:00, defendants Qian and Dan were apprehended on site by police in a warehouse at the entrance of a village in a town of a district in a certain city. After the incident, the stolen funds were recovered. It is also found that defendant Qian had previously been detained for three days by a district branch of a city police department for gambling on January 18, 2010. Defendant Dan was fined RMB 500 by Jinghu branch of a city police department for gambling on December 13, 2011, and had been administratively detained for gambling by Jinghu branch on August 23, 2012. These facts were undisputed by defendants Qian and Dan during the court hearing and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Xu, Liao, Yu, Xue, Tu, Kong, Chen Jia, Zhang, Chen Yi, inspection records, evidence preservation lists, seizure lists, situation statements, recovery item lists, identification records and photos, administrative penalty decision documents, arrest explanations, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Qian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: On November 10, 2015, at approximately 4:00 PM, defendant Li, with the assistance of defendant Lu, contacted drug buyer Ye. They agreed to conduct a drug transaction in front of the Bridal Embroidery Boutique on Renmin Third Road, Xinan Street, Sanshui District, Foshan City. Subsequently, drug buyer Ye transferred 135 RMB as drug money through Alipay to defendant Lu's Alipay account, and defendant Lu then transferred 125 RMB to defendant Li's Alipay account. Following this, defendant Li went to the agreed location and sold one packet of methamphetamine to drug buyer Ye. After the transaction was completed, both individuals were apprehended by the police with the evidence in hand, and one packet of methamphetamine, weighing 0.36 grams, was confiscated from drug buyer Ye. On the same day, at approximately 9:00 PM, the police arrested defendant Lu near the Yunxiu Market on Xinan Street, Sanshui District, Foshan City. Accordingly, the prosecution recommended that the court sentence defendants Li and Lu to imprisonment for a term of more than six months but less than one year, along with a fine, for the crime of x. Defendant Li and Lu did not raise any objections during the court hearings, and the facts were substantiated by the prosecution's evidence, including the confessions and defenses of defendants Li and Lu, the testimony of witness Ye, identification records, the administrative penalty decision, on-site test reports, seizure decision and inventory, photographs, phone inspection reports, call record lists, criminal examination reports, on-site inspection records, criminal history checks, arrest details, household registration documents, case registration form, and case filing decision. The court hereby confirms these findings.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: On July 20, 2018, at around 1 a.m., at the 3rd floor of Wealthport, Xincheng District, a certain place, at Domain Shang International Catering, the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, Yu, and others, after drinking, caused a disturbance in the hallway. When the victims, Zhang and Yang, went over to stop them, the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, and Yu injured victim Zhang, causing three of Zhang’s front teeth to fall out and a nasal bone fracture. According to the forensic identification by the First Hospital of a certain place, Zhang's dental injuries were classified as minor injuries of level two, and the nasal bone injury as minor. After the incident, the families of defendants Kong, Zhao, and Yu actively compensated victim Zhang, and Zhang forgave Kong, Zhao, and Yu. On March 18, 2019, defendant Yu voluntarily surrendered to the police. In response to the aforementioned accusations, the prosecuting agency presented and read out documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, identification records, audiovisual materials, and other evidence in court. The prosecution believes that the defendants Jin, Kong, Zhao, and Yu, without cause, attacked others in a public place, causing victim Zhang's dental injury to be classified as minor injury level two and the nasal bone injury as minor, which constitutes a grave offense. Their conduct violates Article X, Item (1) of the Crimin", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Kong": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Gangbei District of a certain city charged that in mid-March 2015, defendants Huang and Tang, after prior discussion, jointly funded the purchase of five slot machines with gambling functions online. In late March, Huang and Tang placed the slot machines in street-facing shops near a certain city's senior high school and Hecheng Elementary School in the Gangbei District of the same city. They promised the shop owners a monthly rent of 400 yuan for each slot machine and additionally offered a 5% commission on the slot machine's profits. By the time the case was discovered, the two defendants had illegally profited 1,000 yuan in total. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Tang during the court hearing. Moreover, these facts are substantiated by evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the arrest record, household registration certificates, site maps, identification photos, identification records and photos, transcripts of evidence extraction, list of seized items, account statements, the video game facilities and equipment appraisal report and notice, testimonies from witnesses Wei, Gan, Yan, Yuan, and Li, as well as confessions from defendants Huang and Tang, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on February 28, 2014, at around 13:00, the defendants Yang and Dong, at the west side of the entrance to the Democratic Party office building at the Xinxing Market on Xinxing Road in Wuzhou City, committed theft in front of a stall selling sundries. Dong was responsible for keeping watch while Yang used tweezers to steal a wallet from the shopping bag carried by the victim Hu. The wallet contained RMB 4600 in cash and two China Post Savings Bank cards. As the two defendants were about to leave the scene, they were apprehended by police officers. It was further found that after the incident, the public security organs seized the stolen wallet, two bank cards, RMB 4600, and two tweezers used as tools for the crime. The stolen items have been returned to the victim Hu. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial, and they are corroborated by the victim Hu's statement, witnesses Xie and Deng’s testimonies, seizure and return of property document list, photos of the stolen items and tools used in the crime, identification records and photos, proof of the crime resolution process, the defendants' household registration certificates, and criminal record judgment materials, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on October 20, 2014, at around 10 p.m., the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang went to the front of Zhongyin Building, Panyu Square, Qinghe East Road, Shiqiao Street, a certain district in a certain city, where they met the victim Lin, as prearranged, and a dispute arose over a debt. During this time, the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang assaulted the victim Lin with fists and feet, causing injuries (identified as minor injuries of the second degree). Subsequently, the defendants Chen and Zhang used a kitchen knife and an anti-theft lock to smash the windows of Lin's car (assessed damage cost was 500 RMB). The police who arrived after being notified apprehended the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang at the scene and seized a kitchen knife and an anti-theft lock used in the crime. It was also found that after the incident, the defendants compensated the victim Lin with 20,000 RMB and received his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial and are substantiated by the victim Lin's statements, the confessions of the defendants He, Chen, and Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Qu, Li, and Qin, identification records, appraisal conclusions, settlement agreement, receipt, on-site inspection records, site diagrams, photographic materials, the process of arrest, and the solving of the case, among other evidence.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Henan Province charged that on October 19, 2016, the defendants Wang and Zhao, together with \"Someone,\" successively targeted Jia supermarket operated by the victim Yang and Yi supermarket operated by the victim Zhou, located in the western section of Jiaotong Road in the district of the same city. \"Someone\" was responsible for waiting nearby on a motorcycle, while Zhao, under the guise of purchasing goods, distracted the store staff, and Wang took the opportunity to steal cigarettes from the store. Zhao was caught by Yang after stealing cigarettes from Jia supermarket, while Wang and \"Someone\" fled with the cigarettes. According to the appraisal, the stolen cigarettes were valued at a total of 2,330 yuan. It was also found that after the incident, the family members of defendants Wang and Zhao compensated the victims for all economic losses. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Zhao during the trial, and were sufficiently confirmed by victim statements, documentary evidence, restitution certificates, the circumstances of the apprehension, and other evidence.", "label": {"Wang": ["Fine"], "Zhao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that from October 2013 to July 2014, the defendant He contacted others via QQ and used courier services to purchase counterfeit 10-yuan notes at prices ranging from 1.6 to 2.0 yuan each. He then sold them at prices ranging from 2.5 to 3.5 yuan each, thereby making a profit. He sold approximately 2,627 counterfeit 10-yuan notes, and with the 526 notes found in his home and the 656 notes returned by U-Speed Courier, he purchased a total of 3,809 counterfeit 10-yuan notes, with a total face value of 38,090 yuan. Defendant Liu, knowing that He was purchasing counterfeit currency, still assisted He in June 2014 by signing for courier packages on three occasions and advancing payments, signing for a total of 550 counterfeit notes, with a total face value of 5,500 yuan. The counterfeit banknotes discovered in the case were authenticated by the Ziyang Central Sub-branch of the People's Bank of China as counterfeit. It was additionally confirmed that after being brought to justice, defendants He and Liu both truthfully confessed their criminal activities. After He was taken into custody, he assisted judicial authorities in capturing other criminal suspects, which was verified to be true. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants and their defense during the trial hearing, and were substantiated with documentary evidence, witness testimonies, inspection records, lists of seized items, and expert opinions, all sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"He": ["Fine"], "Liu": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. In 2013, the defendant Liang, knowing that it was a stolen vehicle, purchased a silver-white Wuling Zhiguang minivan without license plates or documentation from Jiang (handled in a separate case) for 5,000 yuan on a certain road in Village Jia, District of this city. According to the Changzhi City Price Appraisal Center, the value of the vehicle involved is 11,807 yuan. 2. In November 2013, the defendants Yang and Liang, knowing that it was a vehicle of unknown origin, purchased a white Wuling Zhiguang minivan without license plates or documentation from a person nicknamed \"Little Li\" (handled in a separate case) for 10,000 yuan at Liang's home in Village Yi, this district. According to the Changzhi City Price Appraisal Center, the value of the vehicle involved is 18,115 yuan. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On March 18, 2015, at around 16:00, the defendants Xu and Gao, along with others, forcibly took Shen into a vehicle near the \"Huateng\" community in a certain district of this city due to a debt dispute. They detained Shen at various locations in the city, during which they assaulted Shen and forced Shen to write an IOU for 20,000 yuan. They also confiscated the watch in Shen's possession. At about 21:00 that evening, the defendants Xu and Gao, along with others, after forcing Shen to hand over and destroy a 15,000 yuan promissory note owed to defendant Gao, released Shen. According to an appraisal, Shen's injuries were minor.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention"], "Gao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the afternoon of September 28, 2014, Wu died during an electrofishing incident. Wu's family members, including Zhou Yi, Zhou Jia, and others, believed that the Dong'an Police Station of Wujin District Public Security Bureau in Changzhou handled the matter unfairly. At around 8 a.m. on September 29, 2014, the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, Lu, along with Zhou Yi, Zhou Bing (handled separately), and 10 others went to the Dong'an Police Station in a certain town in Wujin District, Changzhou, to demand an explanation. During the reception by police instructor Zhou Ji, the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, Lu, and others snatched the video camera that officer Zhu was using to film. They assaulted victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, and Wan by choking them, punching, and kicking, thereby obstructing the police officers from performing their duties. It was also found that the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, and Lu had obtained forgiveness from the victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, Wan, and Zhou Ji. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Zhou Jia, and Lu during the trial. These facts were supported by the statements of the victims Zhu, Zhou Wu, and Wan; photos of injuries and medical records; testimonies from witnesses Zhou Yi, Zhou Ding, and Zhou Bing; and evidence provided by the public security organs, including the incident report, the arrest process, statements of circumstances, identification records and photos, video surveillance materials and screenshots, on-site photos, and the administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient to be recognized.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: On the evening of September 22, 2013, the defendants Xie and Li, together with Zhou and Xie A (all handled in separate cases), decided to commit theft after discussion. They went to the entrance of No. 011 Liming Road in a certain district of this city, and by using wire connection techniques, stole a Qingqi Suzuki two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Wang, valued at 800 yuan. Afterwards, the four of them went to the stairway entrance of a unit in the former teacher accommodation in a district of this city and using the same technique, stole a Haojue two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Fan, valued at 700 yuan. Subsequently, the four of them went to the entrance of a chicken coop in a village in a town in this city and using the same technique, stole a Wuyang Honda two-wheeled motorcycle parked there by the victim Xu, valued at 1000 yuan. After the incident, the public security organs have recovered these vehicles and returned them to the victims. In summary, the defendants Xie and Li committed theft in collaboration three times, with a total value of 2500 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Xie and Li during the trial, and are supported by evidence including household registration certificates, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, explanations, testimony of the witness Wu, arrest details, statements by the victims Wang, Fan, and Xu, a price appraisal conclusion, and identification transcripts and photos, which are sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Xie": ["Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that at around 2 a.m. on June 9, 2014, the defendant Fan, together with the defendant Han and Wang (handled in a separate case), Xia, and others, were having a late-night snack at a stall at the intersection of Jiefang Street and the department store in a certain city. During the meal, the defendant Fan kicked a beer bottle towards the feet of Qiu and He, residents of a certain city, who were having a late-night snack at a nearby table. He questioned Fan about this, which made Fan dissatisfied. When Qiu, He, and others were about to leave after their late-night snack, the defendant Fan, in collaboration with the defendant Han and Wang, used a knife to injure Qiu. According to a forensic medical assessment, Qiu's injuries are classified as minor injuries. In response to the above allegations of criminal facts, the public prosecution agency read out or presented relevant evidence in court, including the victim's statement, witness testimonies, the forensic medical assessment of the degree of physical injury, physical evidence, the process of the incident, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fan and Han.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county has charged that Zhou (already sentenced), in collaboration with defendants Zhan and Hu, among others, started operating gambling dens from mid-May 2013 at the home of Li in a certain village of a certain town, at various locations in the town, and at the border between a community and another place. Hu was responsible for transporting gamblers in the casino, while Zhan assisted with various tasks. The defendants Zhan and Hu raised no objections during the trial proceedings, and the facts have been confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhou and Kang, as well as evidence from the Public Security Bureau of the county, which provided information on the local population, site diagrams, identification records, and other evidence sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Jinwan District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that starting from April 2015, the defendants He and Zhang, a married couple, received lottery bets from a certain place in the convenience store they operated on the first floor of the comprehensive building in Tielu Village, a certain town in a certain city. They reported the betting situation for each period to their \"superiors\" Li Moujiang and Weng Mou (both handled in separate cases), and took a commission of about 10% of the total bet amount. The two defendants received bets from about twenty to thirty people per period, with the amount of bets per period ranging from approximately 700 to 1,800 yuan. They accepted bets for more than twenty periods, and by the time the case was uncovered, they had made a total profit of over 5,000 yuan.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Starting from January 2016, defendant Zheng, knowing that defendant Guo did not have the qualification certificate for heavy machinery operation, still violated safety management regulations by assigning Guo to operate a crane at Jianhua Pipe Pile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jianhua Company) located at No. 2, Sha Tsai Road, Sha Tsai Village, Minzhong Town, Zhongshan City. On the night of February 23 of the same year, Zheng instructed Guo to operate a crane at Jianhua Company's D3 site. While Guo A was lifting a pipe pile with the crane, due to not mastering operational techniques and improper operation, he began lifting the pipe pile before the victim, Liu, had moved to a safe area. As a result, the pipe pile fell, crushing Liu from Zhongshan Jianxing Logistics Co., Ltd. (Jianxing Company) to death (according to forensic identification, Liu's cause of death was traumatic shock caused by massive blunt force trauma to the head and torso). After the incident, Guo and Zheng remained at the scene awaiting the police. After being apprehended, they truthfully confessed to the above facts. Furthermore, it was ascertained that after the incident, Jianxing Company reached an agreement with the victim's family and compensated them with 950,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Guo and Zheng during the trial, and were corroborated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the confess", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: In November 2010, defendant Mou transferred his Hyundai car located in a certain region, originally insured with the Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company Ltd., a branch in a certain state (hereinafter referred to as Ping An P&C), to defendant Hu's name. The car's license plate was changed but the vehicle was still possessed and used by Mou. On January 2011, due to poor condition, high maintenance costs, and difficulty in selling the car, Mou intended to fabricate a unilateral car accident to fraudulently claim the insurance money. Mou initially took the car to Zhu's Xin Feng Auto Repair Shop, located at 4 Tongsheng Road in a certain city district, and instructed Shu, a mechanic at the shop, to replace the car's original airbags with old ones. On the night of January 8, 2011, in collusion with Zhu, Weng, and Shu, they drove the car and parked it near a mountain forest contracted by Zhu, preparing to stage the accident. The next night, Mou, Zhu, Hu, Xi", "label": {"Mou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Weng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Gusu District in a certain city accused defendants Xu and Li that from February to April 2015, they repeatedly evaded expressway toll fees totaling RMB 10,900.83 by using steel plates to lighten the weight during the weighing process at several toll stations in certain areas of the city's ring expressway.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at about 21:00 on March 2, 2014, defendants Yang and Sun, after drinking, went to the Hualian Hotel on Wenxi Road, Chunxi Town, Gaochun District, Nanjing City, intending to stay overnight. When trying to check in, they unjustifiably refused to show their identification cards and were therefore denied service by the attendant. As a result, defendants Yang and Sun verbally abused the attendant. When hotel security guard Yin intervened, Yang and Sun beat him, causing Yin multiple injuries to his face and waist. Forensic examination determined that victim Yin’s bilateral transverse process fractures of the lumbar vertebrae 1-2 constituted minor injury of the first degree, and the facial injuries were classified as slight injury. On March 2, 2014, defendants Yang and Sun were apprehended. During the trial, mediated by this court, an agreement was reached: defendants Yang and Sun jointly compensated victim Yin a total of 25,000 RMB for medical expenses, lost income, nursing fees, and other economic losses, which was fulfilled in court. Victim Yin expressed forgiveness and requested leniency for the defendants. The facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court by the public prosecution authority, which this court acknowledges: 1. The statement of the victim Yin regarding being assaulted and injured by the two defendants, along with the identification records and photos of the defendants. 2. Testimony of witness Qing, confirming the two intoxicated men arrived at the hotel for check-in, were refused after failing to provide IDs, and then assaulted hotel security guard Yin, with one individual identified as Yang after showing ID. 3. Surveillance video footage and accompanying explanation. 4. Victim Yin’s medical records and medical invoices. 5. Forensic medical examination report on bodily injury extent from the Gaochun branch of Nanjing Public Security Bureau, detailing the apprehension process. 6. Compensation agreement, receipt, and statement of forgiveness. 7. Identification documents and statements of the two defendants. Defendants Yang and Sun raised no objection to these facts and evidence, offered no defense, and expressed willingness to plead guilty.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged and this court has determined through trial that, at approximately 10 p.m. on January 26, 2015, the defendant Shi got into a scuffle with the victim Wang over a trivial matter at the intersection of Bailu North Road and Xiaolin Road in Yushan Town, a certain city. Subsequently, the defendant Zhou arrived at the scene and joined defendant Shi in assaulting the victim Wang, resulting in fractures to Wang's 10th, 11th, and 12th ribs on the left side. According to a forensic medical examination, the injury to Wang's chest constituted a grade two minor injury. After being brought to justice, defendant Shi truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Defendant Zhou voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed to the criminal facts after being brought to justice. After the incident, defendant Shi compensated the victim Wang with 5,000 yuan, and the victim Wang expressed understanding towards the actions of both defendants Shi and Zhou. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shi and Zhou during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, testimony from witnesses Pan, Dou Jia, and Dou Yi, identification records, medical records, the forensic medical assessment of the degree of harm, details of arrest and surrender, identity documentation, receipts, a letter of understanding, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts, which this court hereby confirms.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that, from the evening of October 26 to the early morning of October 27, 2015, defendants Ou and Wang, along with Lin, Feng, and Zhang (all three were dealt with in a separate case, Zhang was born on March 26, 2002), conspired to commit theft while they were playing at defendant Ou's home. Around 2 p.m. on December 27, defendants Ou, Wang, Lin, and Zhang walked to the vicinity of victim Xia's residence at *** number, while Feng arrived on a motorcycle. Subsequently, defendants Ou and Lin acted as lookouts; Zhang entered the house through a window to steal, later handing over a stolen Amoi A072 tablet (valued at 770 RMB as appraised), a Coolpad 8076 mobile phone (valued at 180 RMB as appraised), a bracelet (valued at 20 RMB as appraised), two mobile phone chargers (brands unknown), 10 Hong Kong dollars, and 100 Vietnamese dong to defendants Wang and Feng, who were waiting outside to assist. After succeeding in their theft, the five individuals fled the scene and later went to Xin Haofa Trading Company on Tongxin Middle Road in Baijiao Town, where they sold the Amoi tablet to Weng and exchanged the 10 Hong Kong dollars for RMB. On October 28, 2015, the police arrested defendants Ou and Lin, recovering the Coolpad mobile phone involved in the case from defendant Ou, the bracelet involved in the case from Lin, and the Amoi tablet and 10 Hong Kong dollars from Weng. All of the aforementioned items were returned to the victim Xia. On October 28, 2015, defendant Wang turned himself into the police; on November 26, 2015, Feng turned himself into the police. These facts, to which defendants Ou and Wang raised no objections during the trial, are substantiated by the victim Xia's statement, the identification records of defendants Ou and Wang, the confessions and identification records of co-defendants Zhang, Lin, and Feng, the testimony and identification record of witness Weng, the search records, seizure warrant, seizure records, seizure list, return list, identification photos, onsite photos, arrest process, household registration documents, case handling notes, test report, appraisal report on the value of the involved property, on-site test report, telephone call records, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on the afternoon of February 8, 2017, in a certain village of a certain county, victim Wang B and others, after attending a communal meal in the village, were playing cards at a kiosk in the village with their family members Chen B, Chen A, Zhong, and defendant Wang and Wang A (already sentenced) and others. Due to differing play styles, they started arguing. Because defendant Wang was not a local of a certain town, he called Lin B from a certain village in the town (handled in another case), asking Lin B to come to the village to mediate. Lin B, who was having tea in a certain place in the town, after receiving the call, prepared to drive to the village. Defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A (handled in another case) who were having tea with Lin B also got in the car. About 10 minutes later, Lin B drove to the entrance of the village and parked. Defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A first got off the car and walked towards the village, walking approximately 50 meters to meet defendants Wang and Wang A at a kiosk in the slope. Defendant Mo saw a knife in the kiosk and picked it up. Then, defendants Mo, Su, and Lin A followed defendants Wang and Wang A into the village. After walking about 100 meters, they encountered victims Wang B, Chen B, and others at the trash bins in the village, and a dispute arose again. Defendant Su first hit Chen B, who then ran away after being punched. Defendants Wang and Wang A chased after him. Meanwhile, defendant Mo slashed victim Wang B's arm", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Detention"], "Su": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: Around July 2013, defendants Cheng, Lin, and others engaged in illegal pyramid selling activities in the vicinity of a certain town, with one den set up on the fifth floor of a rented house in the special zone for overseas Chinese in a certain town. Defendant Cheng acted as the \"director\" of this pyramid selling den, responsible for managing the daily affairs of the den. Defendant Lin served as the \"director\" of other dens and often helped at this den. At the end of July of the same year, the victim Gao was lured to this pyramid selling den by an online friend. On September 4 of the same year, victim Xin was lured to the den by defendant Lin. On September 8 of the same year, victim Wang A was lured to the den by accomplice \"Wang B\" (dealt with in a separate case). On October 3 of the same year, victim Chen A was lured to the den by accomplice \"Chen B\" (dealt with in a separate case). In the den, defendant Cheng participated and inst", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged that around 2 p.m. on December 31, 2017, defendants Lu, Tang, and Yao forcibly took the victim, Yuan, from the Jiangping Internet Cafe in Taixing City to the Huaxia Venture Capital Company on Yongfeng Road in Taixing City to demand repayment of high-interest loans. They used slapping and guarding as methods to force the debt repayment, restricting the victim's personal freedom for approximately 9 hours until around 11 p.m. that day. During this period, defendant Lu pulled Yuan's hair and slapped Yuan once, while defendant Yao slapped Yuan several times. After being apprehended, defendants Lu, Tang, and Yao all truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, defendant Lu voluntarily compensated the victim and received the victim's forgiveness.", "label": {"Lu": ["Detention"], "Tang": ["Detention"], "Yao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that around 1 a.m. on February 23, 2021, the defendants Wan and Zheng, while riding past Moutai Red Army Elementary School, noticed a black Chunfeng brand two-wheeled motorcycle parked by the roadside. The two found the motorcycle attractive and jointly stole it, riding it to a certain town in a certain county of a certain province to Mou's residence, intending to use it for themselves. After the incident, the public security authorities apprehended Wan and Zheng, seized the stolen motorcycle in accordance with the law, and returned it to the victim Xiang. The families of Wan and Zheng apologized and compensated the victim, obtaining the victim's forgiveness. According to the Price Certification Center of the Renhuai City Development and Reform Bureau, the market retail price of the stolen Chunfeng brand ordinary two-wheeled motorcycle was 16,928 yuan as of February 23, 2021. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence including the case acceptance register, decision to open a case, circumstances of arrest, household registration information, mandatory examination documents, on-site inspection report, records of seizure, seizure decision, inventory of returned items, purchase invoice, motor vehicle registration certificate, motorcycle registration certificate, proof documents, witness testimonies, statements from the victim, confessions and defenses from the defendants Zheng and Wan, the price determination conclusion, and records of examination, identification, and audiovisual materials.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in September 2015, Wang and Du (both minors, handled in separate cases) had a quarrel on QQ over trivial matters. They decided to gather people to fight at Friendship Square in the High-Tech Zone of the city. On October 30, 2015, around 2:30 pm, Du, leading Wu and others, and Wang, leading Geng and others, engaged in a fight using baseball bats, batons, and other weapons at Friendship Square in the High-Tech Zone of the city.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Geng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province charged that: After conspiring together, defendants Bao and Zhang, on December 23, 2013, at around 10 am, took advantage of Bao's opportunity to stay in Room 8215 of the Free City Intercity Hotel on Freedom Road in a district of this city with Chen and Li. While the latter two were asleep, Bao stole Chen's wallet (which contained a bank card and an ID card), left the room door ajar, and departed to meet defendant Zhang who was waiting outside. Together, they went to the Wuchang Jiefang Road Branch of China Construction Bank, used the card to withdraw 8000 yuan from an ATM. Subsequently, defendants Bao and Zhang returned to the aforementioned hotel, and Zhang entered Room 8215 by sneaking in through the door, stole an Apple brand mobile phone belonging to Chen (valued at 2500 yuan), and the two then divided the stolen money and goods. Defendants Bao and Zhang turned themselves into the public security authorities on December 26 and 27, 2013, respectively. The stolen phone and 5300 yuan of the stolen money were recovered and returned in full to the victim Chen, along with 2700 yuan compensated by a relative on behalf of defendant Bao. Regarding the above facts, defendants Bao and Zhang expressed no objections during the trial, and they were confirmed by evidence provided by the prosecution, including the investigation report issued by the public security authorities, the process of apprehension, the scene identification and photos of the stolen goods, the seizure and return list of stolen money and goods, the valuation appraisal, the report and statement from victim Chen, the bank card transaction inquiry list, and the confessions of defendants Bao and Zhang. The evidence, which was consistent and corroborative, was presented, cross-examined, and confirmed in court, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Bao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained that defendants Li and Zhang, on June 20, 2015, at approximately 17:00, at the intersection of Changqing Road and Yindun Road in this city, had a dispute with a taxi driver, Chen, over taking a taxi. Subsequently, they used an iron rod and their fists and feet to assault the victim, Chen, and were apprehended at the scene by public security officers. The forensic identification report determined that the cumulative length of the lacerations on the victim Chen's head and face was 4.4 centimeters, the area of contusion on the right waist was 45 square centimeters, the cumulative area of the contusions on both lower limbs was 52 square centimeters, and the lumbar spine X-ray report indicated a mild posterior displacement of the L5 vertebra. The MRI scan showed mild posterior displacement of the L5 vertebra and protrusion of the L2/3, L3/4, L4/5 discs, and a posterior protrusion of L5/S1. The degree of injury was classified as minor injury of the second degree. It was also found that during the trial of the case, the victim Chen filed an incidental civil lawsuit. Through mediation presided over by this court, defendants Li and Zhang compensated the victim Chen for all economic losses, amounting to 60,000 RMB. The victim Chen expressed forgiveness towards defendants Li and Zhang and applied to withdraw the incidental civil lawsuit. This court orally ruled to allow the victim to withdraw the lawsuit. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by physical evidence photos, basic information on the household population, the process of arrest and case resolution by the public security agency, the incidental civil complaint, receipt, mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, statement of withdrawal, testimonial evidence from witnesses Dai and Lu, the statement and identification record by the victim Chen, and the forensic identification report, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at the end of 2007, the defendants Jie and Lian, as employees of a state agency, abused their power by illegally processing two village house ownership certificates for Xin (handled in a separate case), even though Xin's submitted materials did not meet the requirements for obtaining village house ownership certificates. This resulted in the demolition and land acquisition headquarters in the Chengbei area of a certain district in a certain city compensating 12 households who purchased houses built by Xin, treating them as small property houses during the demolition and land acquisition process in the Chengbei area in 2008, causing a national loss of 2,153,842 RMB. To support these allegations, the prosecution provides the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: residence certificate, appointment documents, files from the municipal government office (Ji Zheng Ban Fa [1999] No. 73), Shandong Provincial Government (Lu Mou Mou Zi [1998] No. 262), (Lu Mou Mou Zi [2006] No. 58), and \"Opinions on Compensation and Settlement for Small Property Houses from the Chengbei Area Demolition and Construction Headquarters\"; 2. Witness testimonies; 3. Statements and defenses from the defendants Jie, Lian, and others.", "label": {"Jie": [], "Lian": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Banner charges: On March 13, 2020, at around 17:30, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went to the horse farm operated by a certain Feng in a village of Taigemudian Town, a certain Banner. Together, they stole from the steel structure house of the farm: one shaver, one square table, one Star brand small refrigerator, and one waterproof two-core electric wire. On March 14, 2020, around 11:00, defendant Tian went to the horse farm operated by Feng in the same village and stole from the steel structure house of the farm: one square table, one stove, one waterproof three-core electric wire, 15 liters of diesel, and one Triangle brand electric kettle. On March 16, 2020, at around 17:30, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went again to the farm and together stole from its steel structure house: one water pump and one waterproof two-core wire. On March 28, 2020, around 11:00, the two defendants, Tian and Wang, went to the same farm again and, while stealing metal shelves and iron pipes from the steel structure house, were discovered by Yun, who called the police. Later, they were caught on the spot by officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain Banner. The defendants, Tian and Wang, did not object to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations and signed the confirmation. They also raised no objections during the court trial process. According to the appraisal conclusion provided by the Price Certification Center of a certain Banner, document number Tuzuojiayanzi [2020] No. 10, the total value of the stolen property is RMB 1,749.", "label": {"Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place in a certain banner charges that in April 2017, defendants Li and Liu acquired peanuts from rural areas and, after selection and packaging, sold them as peanut seeds at a price of 6.6 yuan per jin to villagers from Haridaobugacha and Haolibao Gacha in a certain town in a certain banner. A total of 22,000 jin of these unmarked peanut seeds were sold, involving an amount of 145,200.00 yuan. After planting, the villagers who purchased the peanut seeds from Li and Liu experienced situations where the germination rate was low or the seeds rotted in the ground, resulting in losses to over 3,000 mu of farmland. After the case was discovered, defendants Li and Liu compensated the victims a total of 164,090.00 yuan, and received the victims' understanding. Upon coming to trial, defendants Li and Liu truthfully confessed their crimes. After being informed of the system of leniency for pleading guilty, they voluntarily signed the \"Confession and Leniency Plea Statement\" in the presence of duty lawyer Su. To prove the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including: the registration form for case acceptance, the decision to file a case, household registration information, case transfer letter, compensation agreement, receipt, statements from victims Qi and others, confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Liu, identification records, and inspection and examination records.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that from March to September 2014, the defendants Luo and Chen set up a casino at the stone slab in the small park opposite the Third Elementary School on Xiuxian Road, Xinhua Street, in the district. Defendant Chen was responsible for dealing cards and collecting rake money, which was then handed over to defendant Luo. On September 26, 2014, the public security authorities uncovered this casino and arrested defendant Chen, seizing one deck of playing cards. On October 26, 2014, the public security authorities arrested defendant Luo on the Baohua Road section of Xinhua Street.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that starting from January 12, 2016, the defendants Peng, Fu, and Bai, together with Liao A, Yao, Wen (all at large), and others, set up a casino in room 2805, unit 1, North Tower, Jinling Family, XX District, XX City, using the \"Fight Bull\" method to organize gambling activities. Defendant Peng invested 4,000 RMB and participated in the profit sharing, obtaining illicit money amounting to approximately 10,000 RMB. Defendants Fu and Bai organized customers for the casino and participated in the profit sharing, obtaining illicit money amounting to approximately 4,000 RMB and 2,000 RMB respectively. Later, the casino employed Xiao and Guo (both have been administratively punished) as attendants responsible for skimming and lookout. At around 2 a.m. on January 22, 2016, the public security authorities raided the casino, capturing defendants Peng, Fu, Bai, and individuals such as Wu and Shu, who were engaging in gambling activities (all have been administratively punished) and confiscated illegal proceeds of 10,300 RMB from that day at the scene. Defendant Peng had no objections during the court trial concerning the above facts, which were also substantiated by evidence such as the arrest report and situation notes provided by the local police station under the Yuhua Branch of the Public Security Bureau of XX City, inspection records, lists of seized and recovered items, lists of evidence preservation, identification records and photographs, on-site photographs, house rental contracts, Public Security Administrative Punishment Decision Documents Nos. [2016] 0221, 0222, 0223, 0224, 0225, 0226, 0227, 0228, 0229 from the Yuhua Branch of the Public Security Bureau of XX City, witness testimonies from Guo, Xiao, Xie, Hu A, Hu B, Shu, Liao, Deng A, Liang A, Wu, Deng B, He, Wang, Liang B, and Li, confessions from defendants Peng, Fu, and Bai and evidence regarding their identities and behaviors, sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on March 20, 2016, the defendant Chen, in the backyard of the old tax bureau behind Fenghuo on Baishazhou Avenue, Hongshan District, a certain city, used tools he carried with him to pry open the security window, stealing 500 RMB in cash and two bottles of liquor from the victim, Wang. Subsequently, defendant Chen invited defendant Liao to drive to the crime scene again, where they stole a carton of Huanghelou 1916 cigarettes, several packs of Huanghelou Mantianyou cigarettes, over thirty bottles of liquor, and various daily necessities from the victim, Wang. After appraisal, the total value of the items involved was 4266.9 RMB. On March 23, 2016, defendants Chen and Liao were apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendants Chen and Liao have compensated the victim, Wang, in the amount of 15,000 RMB and obtained his forgiveness.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in early October 2014, the defendants Xiang and Gu, after discussion, conspired to organize gambling in the form of playing \"Little Nine\" at the tea room operated by Xiang located in the market of Qianjin Village, a certain town in Haining City. They were joined by Gao, Qian, Zhang, and others, from which they made a profit of over 10,500 yuan. Among the defendants, Xiang was responsible for taking commissions, while Gu managed the casino. Afterward, aside from distributing so-called reward money and covering expenses for the participants, each of the defendants Xiang and Gu received 2,350 yuan. During the trial of this case, Gu returned the illegal income of 2,350 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Xiang and Gu during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by evidence including witness testimonies from gambling participants such as Gao, the arrest process, household registration proof, the criminal judgment and execution notice, and receipt records, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma participated in the \"Tianjin Tiens Pyramid Scheme Organization.\" Wu held the position of \"Director,\" Wang was the \"Housekeeper,\" and Ma was the \"Big Brother.\" From May 25 to May 30, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma lured the victim, Zu, into this pyramid scheme organization, restricted his personal freedom at Room 611, No. 12, Nancang East Village, Yicheng Street, Yixing City, and used physical assault and other means to force Zu to join the pyramid scheme. On May 30, 2015, due to a report from another person, the victim Zu was rescued. On May 30, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma were arrested by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the above facts after being brought to justice. The defendants Wu, Wang, and Ma did not object to the above facts during the trial, and these were corroborated by the victim Zu's statement record, the testimony record of witness Guo, the confessions of co-offenders Xue, Li, and Jin, among others, the on-site inspection record and related identification records produced by the Yixing City Public Security Bureau, as well as the explanatory materials on the investigation of the criminal case, police registration forms, relevant statements, and household registration documents provided by the public security investigative personnel, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 7:40 a.m. on June 25, 2014, defendants Song and Liu, while on a No. 245 bus in this city, stole a black wallet from the shoulder bag carried by the victim, Nie, through Liu, with Song assisting. The wallet contained 300 yuan and an ID card. Due to their suspicious behavior, Song and Liu were apprehended by police officers, and the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victim.", "label": {"Song": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court trial found that around 18:00 on October 9, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Shi rented a Honda Accord car (license plate Liao PXXX**) from a car rental company under the pretense of using it for rental purposes. On October 10, 2014, Zhou and Shi used the car as collateral to borrow 12,000 yuan from the owner of a small loan company, Zhou. The Huludao City Involved Items Price Evaluation Center appraised the car's value at 48,000 yuan. It was also found that the defendants Zhou and Shi had compensated the victim for all economic losses and obtained the forgiveness of Wang, the owner of the car rental company. Defendants Zhou and Shi admitted to the aforementioned criminal facts during the trial. The statements of the victim, witnesses' testimonies, car rental contract, letter of forgiveness, IOU, personal loan contract, defendants' household registration materials and actual behavior, source of the case, and details of the arrest all serve as evidence. After cross-examination during the trial, the evidence was sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. Between July and August 2012, defendants Jin, Zhu, and Tao, in collusion with others, twice established a casino in Room 101, Unit 1, Building 16, Jixiang Community, Danghu Street, in a house rented by defendant Tao in a certain city. They organized gambling in the form of \"inserting Luo\" with people such as Zheng (handled separately), illegally profiting more than 4,200 yuan. 2. On a day between July and August of the same year, defendants Jin, Zhu, Dai, and Tao, in collusion with others, established a casino at the same location in Tao's rental property. They organized gambling in the form of \"inserting Luo\" with people such as Zheng, illegally profiting more than 2,000 yuan. 3. Between July and August of the same year, defendants Jin, Zhu, Dai, and Song, in collusion with others, established a casino five times at Song's home in Room 502, Unit 2, Building 20, a village in Danghu Street of a certain city. They organized gambling in the form of \"inserting Luo\" with people such as Zheng, illegally profiting more than 16,900 yuan. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by the five defendants during the court trial. Furthermore, there is evidence such as witness testimonies, criminal judgments for prior offenses, public security administrative penalty decisions, explanatory statements, the course of the crime, the process of apprehension, and identification documents, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was ascertained that the defendants Hu and Ran were classmates. On July 27, 2014, at around 3:00 PM, defendants Hu, Ran, and others including Li and Chen went to the eastern apartment on the 7th floor of Building 2, Unit 1, in the western district of a certain city. They pretended to be police officers, knocked on the victim Zhang's door to open it, and under the pretense of investigating drug use, demanded fines, thereby defrauding Zhang of 20,000 yuan in cash. Additionally, under the guise of a hush fee, they defrauded Zhang of another 2,000 yuan in cash, totaling 22,000 yuan. On September 4, 2014, defendant Hu, pretending to be a police officer, tricked Liu, the father of the victim Liu Feng, into believing he was facilitating an early release from compulsory drug rehabilitation. At the south gate of a square in a certain city's district, he defrauded Liu of 20,000 yuan in cash. On September 21, 2014, at around 6:30 PM, defendants Hu, Ran, and another person, Fei, went to a used car dealership opposite a thermal power plant in a district of a certain city. They pretended to be police officers and took victim Shi away, pretending to interrogate him for drug use and demanded fines, thereby defrauding Shi of 12,000 yuan in cash. On September 23, 2014, the two defendants were arrested by the police and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The money defrauded by the two defendants was squandered by them. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendant Hu and his defense lawyer, defendant Ran and his defense lawyer, and victim Zhang during the court trial. This is corroborated by victim report materials and statements, witness testimonies, identification records, lists of seized items, lists of confiscated items, drug test reports, household registration certificates, the process of arrest, explanations regarding the suspects' capture, and confessions from defendants Hu and Ran, which together provide sufficient grounds for the determination.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ran": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: Defendant Xiu, due to a dispute with Tang, harbored feelings of revenge against Tang and thus approached defendant Liu and Xiu Jia (already sentenced) with the intent to teach Tang a lesson. In early July 2011, under the instruction of defendant Liu, Xiu Jia led a young male twice to the home of villager Lu Jia in the development zone of a certain city to identify the location, intending to exact revenge on Tang, who frequently visited there. At noon on July 13, 2011, defendant Liu learned that Tang was going to Lu Jia's house to hang out. Liu then called Xiu Jia to instruct the already hired three young men to prepare to carry out the assault. After receiving the call from defendant Liu, Xiu Jia led the three young men by taxi to Houmou Village. At around 2 p.m. that day, the three young men, masked, broke into Lu Jia's house, and assaulted Tang with wooden sticks, causing multiple injuries to his body. Afterward, Xiu Jia, who was waiting outside, took the three young men in a taxi to flee the scene. According to forensic identification, the soft tissue contusions on Tang's left shoulder, left upper and lower limbs, and left waist were collectively assessed as minor injuries, while the injury to his right hand was classified as a minor injury. Following the incident, defendant Xiu and Liu were respectively arrested and brought to justice on April 1 and March 17, 2014.", "label": {"Xiu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on October 27, 2014, at around 16:00, defendants Re and Bu, after prior discussion, went together to the entrance of the Xindaxin Mall located on Fengshan Street in this city. There, defendant Re held a child to act as a lookout and cover, while defendant Bu reached into a bag, thereby stealing a white Samsung NOTE2 mobile phone worth 1,460 RMB from the black backpack that the victim, Ye, was carrying on her right shoulder. Subsequently, defendants Re and Bu were apprehended by patrolling police officers from the Yangming Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau while attempting to flee the scene. On the 28th of the same month, they were placed under residential surveillance by the city's Public Security Bureau. However, due to repeated failure to appear after numerous summonses, they were criminally detained and placed on the wanted list. On May 29, 2015, defendants Re and Bu surrendered themselves at the Kuerle Police Station and the Shache Station of the Urumqi Railway Public Security Bureau in Xinjiang, and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. After the incident, the involved mobile phone was recovered and returned to the victim. The defendants, Re and Bu, raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by evidence, including the seizure decision, list of seized items, list of returned items, hospital examination report, population information, \"apprehension record,\" statement of circumstances, the victim Ye's statement, a price appraisal report, and recognition records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Re": ["Fine"], "Bu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 7:00 on June 28, 2015, defendants Zheng and Chen, along with Gong and Ran (both already sentenced), drove motorcycles with covered license plates to a toll exit ramp in a district of a certain city on the Guangsan Highway to pick up passengers. They encountered victims Lu Jia, Lu Yi, and Lu Bing as they got off a bus. Zheng and the others agreed to drive Lu Bing and his companions to their destination for 30 yuan. Subsequently, Zheng drove Lu Bing, Chen drove Lu Yi, Ran drove Lu Jia on a motorcycle with license plate J×××××, and Gong carried Lu Bing’s luggage on a motorcycle with license plate H×××××. The four drivers set off together. On the way, the four led the victims along a detour as they traveled separately. When they reached a spot on the road in front of No. 15, Keji West Road, Shishan Town in a district, Gong, along with Zheng, threatened Lu Bing and forcibly took 250 yuan. Gong then met Chen, and they threatened Lu Yi, forcibly taking 300 ", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was established that from March to September 2015, defendant Zhu, without obtaining the qualification for foreign labor export, recruited workers to go to a certain country and place through Zhuang. Zhu collected a deposit from victims Shi, Yuan, Gao, and 170 other people, each being 5,000 RMB, and from victims Yao and Ni, each being 3,000 RMB, totaling 871,000 RMB from 175 victims. Of this, defendants Zhu and Zhuang received 612,500 RMB and 258,500 RMB respectively as start-up funds for the project. Zhuang additionally paid Zhu a deposit of 200,000 RMB. None of the aforementioned victims were able to go abroad for work. On September 15, 2015, defendants Zhu and Zhuang had a dispute with the workers. During the mediation by the petition department, despite knowing that others had called the police and were waiting on the scene for the issue to be resolved, they truthfully confessed their criminal acts to the police officers who responded to the scene. After the incident, defendants Zhu and Zhuang returned a total of 871,000 RMB, which was refunded to the victims. The above facts are substantiated by the confessions of defendants Zhu and Zhuang, the statements of victims Yuan, Gao, Yao, Ni, and others, the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Ma, Kuang, and others, documentary evidence such as the labor contracts and receipts provided by the victims, the certification issued by the Jintan District Commerce Bureau of Changzhou City, and the incident report provided by the police officers of Xicheng Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of Jintan District, Changzhou City.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at approximately 1:50 a.m. on August 9, 2019, defendant Li hired defendant Bai to drive a Shaanxi-brand heavy-duty semi-trailer truck (license plate XXX) without a permit for road transport of hazardous materials. While driving from east to west along National Highway 109 and reversing from south to north at the 900-kilometer mark within a certain banner's jurisdiction, they collided with a Liberation-brand heavy-duty semi-trailer truck (license plate XXX) driven by Wei, which was traveling from east to west along the same highway. Subsequently, the Liberation-brand truck veered off the southern side of the road, overturned, and caused minor injuries to defendant Bai and the victim Wei, as well as damage to both vehicles and the road infrastructure.\n\nAccording to the determination by a certain banner brigade of the Erdos Public Security Bureau Traffic Management Detachment, defendant Bai bore the primary responsibility for this accident, while the victim Wei had secondary liability. After the incident, defendants Li and Bai voluntarily confessed to their crimes. Through mediation, they agreed to mutually cover losses within the compulsory traffic insurance limits, with any shortfall handled according to their respective liabilities.\n\nIn support of the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution provided relevant evidence and asserted that defendant Li, by hiring defendant Bai to drive a vehicle lacking a permit to transport hazardous chemicals, committed acts that violated Articles X and Item 4 of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The facts of the crime are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient, warranting criminal responsibility for Crime X. Defendants Li and Bai truthfully confessed to the criminal facts upon being brought to justice, which, according to Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, qualifies as confession.\n\nA suggestion was made to sentence defendant Li to one month and fifteen days of criminal detention and a fine; and defendant Bai to one month to one month and fifteen days of criminal detention and a fine. Li and Bai did not object to the charged facts, the crime, or the sentencing recommendations. They agreed to apply the expedited procedure and signed a written confession and plea agreement. They raised no objections during the court trial.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 8 pm on September 30, 2019, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, drove from a certain place to a certain district. After parking the car, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, walked to the Hahusuhai Fishery Company’s crab breeding area to steal crabs. They were later discovered by a security patrol team from Hahusuhai Lake and were taken by force to the Hahusuhai Police Station of the Tuzuoqi Public Security Bureau. The stolen crabs were weighed and seized on-site. According to the [2019] No. 79 price certification conclusion document from the Tuzuoqi Price Certification Center, the stolen crabs were valued at 3,038 RMB. The stolen crabs were returned to the victimized company after the incident. After arriving at the case, the three defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, voluntarily and truthfully confessed their crimes. The defendants, Huang, Tu, and Chen, did not object to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations, and they signed and acknowledged this, raising no objections during the court trial.", "label": {"Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it was found that the defendants Huang and Mao were former employees of a music venue in Bao’an District, a certain city, known as HuanXSong KTV. In August 2013, due to a wage dispute, defendant Huang harbored dissatisfaction towards the company. Consequently, he alone or in collaboration with his colleague, defendant Mao, stole foreign liquors from the company on multiple occasions. The specifics are as follows: \n\nOn August 18, 2013, at around 17:00, defendant Huang entered the company warehouse and stole one bottle each of Xuan Ni Si XO, Ma Mou AXO, and Ren Tou Ma Mou B, which were subsequently sold. According to the appraisal, the three stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 4,088 RMB. \n\nOn August 19, 2013, defendant Huang entered the company warehouse again and stole two bottles each of Xuan Ni Si XO and Ma Mou AXO, which were subsequently sold. According to the appraisal, the four stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 5,546 RMB. \n\nOn August 27, 2013, defendants Huang and Mao plotted in advance and went to the company, with Mao responsible for engaging in conversation to distract the security guard and act as a lookout, while defendant Huang entered the company warehouse and stole a total of twelve bottles of foreign liquors including Xuan Ni Si XO, Ma Mou AXO, and Ren Tou Ma Mou B. The two then sold these stolen goods together. According to the appraisal, the twelve stolen bottles of foreign liquor were valued at a total of 16,056 RMB. \n\nOn February 19, 2014, defendant Huang was apprehended by the public security authorities; defendant Mao was apprehended on March 3, 2014. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Mao during the court hearing, and there is relevant evidence to substantiate these claims, making it sufficient for conviction. Additionally, it was found: After the trial, the family of defendant Mao reached a settlement agreement with the HuanXSong KTV music venue in Bao’an District, a certain city, and received their understanding.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that beginning in November 2013, defendants Qiu, Zheng, Luo, and He, after prior consultation, unlawfully set up a plating factory in a village of a town in a certain district of a certain city for electroplating processing without environmental approval procedures or pollution control equipment. They discharged the industrial wastewater generated during processing directly through ditches to the outside of the factory. On April 11, 2014, they were discovered by the Environmental Protection Bureau of a certain district in a certain city. Tests showed that the total chromium content in the factory's drainage ditch was 19.2 mg/L, which is 19.2 times the national standard for chromium emissions. After the incident, defendants Luo and He voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the above facts. To prove the charges, the prosecutor presented relevant evidence in court.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on October 15, 2015, at 17:29, a drug user named Deng contacted the defendant Li by phone, intending to purchase five methamphetamine pills for 200 yuan, agreeing to trade in a certain district of the city. Later, Li handed over a small package containing five suspected methamphetamine pills, sealed in a transparent plastic bag, to the defendant Mu, instructing Mu to deliver it to Deng, to which Mu agreed. At approximately 17:40 on the same day, Mu sold the five suspected methamphetamine pills (net weight 0.45 grams) to Deng for 200 yuan near the Jiantan River Bridge and returned to Li's residence to hand over the 200 yuan to Li. At 21:39 on the same day, Deng again contacted Li by phone, intending to purchase 100 yuan worth of methamphetamine, agreeing to trade at the exit of the one-way road under the Jiantan River Bridge. At around 22:00, Li drove to the agreed location and sold a small package of suspected methamphetamine, weighing 0.51 grams, to Deng for 100 yuan, before being caught on the spot by the police. The police seized the aforementioned suspected methamphetamine and methamphetamine pills from Deng, and 300 yuan in drug money, along with two mobile phones used for drug dealing, from Li. On the same day, under Li's guidance, the police arrested Mu downstairs at Mu's residence. According to the city's Public Security Bureau Drug Testing Center's identification, methamphetamine components were detected in the aforementioned methamphetamine sample, and methamphetamine and caffeine components were detected in the suspected methamphetamine pills. After being brought to the case, defendants Li and Mu truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the trial, defendants Li and Mu also had no objections to the above facts, which are sufficiently established by photos of the drugs and drug money as physical evidence; case registration form, case initiation decision, the process of arriving at the case, household registration information, call records, explanation of Mu's arrest, on-site test reports; witness testimony from Deng; confessions of defendants Li and Mu; physical evidence examination report; search record, inspection record, extraction record, recognition record, and on-site weighing record, among other evidence.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on January 23, 2014, at around 12 PM in a town in Jarud Banner, Hu had a verbal altercation with the defendant Bao over a parking issue. After the argument, Hu picked up a shovel and assaulted Bao. Later, Bao sought out the defendant Liu and others, who, wielding a shovel head, assaulted Hu, resulting in a fracture of the left orbital bone, damage to the pupil constrictor muscle, and trauma-induced deformation of the pupil. On June 3, 2014, the Tongliao City Hospital Forensic Identification Center assessed that Hu's bodily injuries were of a minor grade level 2. On November 18, 2015, the Institute of Forensic Science and Technology of the China University of Political Science and Law assessed that Hu's bodily injuries were of a minor injury degree.", "label": {"Bao": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: In October 2015, the defendants Deng and Shao, a married couple, rented the ground floor of a building at No. 17 Anping Road, a town in a certain county, to operate the \"Xiaomi Foot Massage\" shop. During the course of business, defendant Deng, in collaboration with Shao, harbored Xu (a minor) and other women to engage in prostitution activities in the foot massage shop. The charge for prostitution was 150 yuan per session, and it was agreed that for each prostitution session performed by Xu and others, the shop would receive a 50-yuan cut. On the evening of March 17, 2016, while Xu was having sexual intercourse with a client named Ji (who has been administratively penalized) at the foot massage shop, they were apprehended by the public security bureau. On May 6, 2016, defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered at the Zhengjiawu police station and made a truthful confession. During the court trial, defendants Deng and Shao raised no objection to the aforementioned facts, which were also corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu, Ji, and Wang, the decision on evidence preservation, the inventory of preserved items, lists and photos of confiscated items, the status of the individual business registration, the administrative penalty decision, proof of voluntary surrender, identification records and photos of the people involved, examination records and photos, the household registration certificates of defendants Deng and Shao, and the account of the case closure, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In late March 2016, Liu Moumou (in a separate case) in Zhenjin County stole a black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle, a red Haoda brand two-wheeled motorcycle, and a red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycle belonging to the victims Yu, Li, Zhao, and others. Knowing that these three motorcycles were obtained through theft, the defendant Du assisted Liu Moumou by riding the red Haoda brand and red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycles to a house he rented in a certain district of a certain city for storage and sale. He also introduced the defendant Yan to Liu Moumou to purchase the black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle. Defendant Yan, knowing the motorcycle was obtained through theft, purchased the black Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle from Liu Moumou. According to the valuation by the Zhenjin County Price Appraisal Center, the Nanjue brand two-wheeled motorcycle was valued at 5623 yuan, the red Haoda brand two-wheeled motorcycle at 4398 yuan, and the red Zongshen brand two-wheeled motorcycle at 6097 yuan. It was further found that after the incident, the police recovered the three stolen motorcycles and returned them to the victims. On April 20, 2016, after being summoned by phone by the public security police, the defendant Yan voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his criminal actions. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Du and Yan during the trial, and there were statements from the victims Yu, Li, and Zhao, which were evidenced during the trial, examination, and verification. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, records of the arrest, identification transcripts and photos, inventory of seized items, inventory of returned items, chat records, criminal photos, situation explanations, and the conclusion of the price appraisal report from the Zhenjin County Price Appraisal Center (Zhi Gu Zi [2016] No. 26) are all on record and are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that on the night of May 30, 2015, at around 11 PM, defendants Gao, Hao, Luo, and others had a verbal altercation with victim Bai1 at the intersection of Wanhe Road, Gaoqiao Village, Industrial Zone, Cangqian Street, Yuhang District, because Bai1 looked at them a few times. Subsequently, defendant Gao gathered defendants Wang, Hao, Luo, and others, and, carrying baseball bats, steel pipes, axes, and other tools, chased the victim's group to the section of road by the Gaoqiao Village farmers' market, where they assaulted victims Hou1, Bai2, and others. As a result, victim Hou1 sustained fractures to the left humerus, ulna, radius, and fibula, with the injuries assessed as minor injuries of the first degree. After the incident, defendant Luo voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The evidence for the prosecution includes documents such as an evidence list, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, forensic medical injury assessment reports, identification records, and surveillance videos.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Hao": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xiaonan District of a certain city charged that around 4 PM on February 2, 2015, the defendants Tang and Tu went to the vicinity of a construction site on Dongyong Road in the High-tech Zone of a certain city and used knives to inflict multiple injuries on the victim Liu, with whom they had a debt dispute. According to forensic identification, the injuries sustained by the victim Liu constituted minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Tang and Tu turned themselves in to the public security authorities and compensated the victim for economic losses in the amount of 296,000 yuan. To establish the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented and read the following evidence during the trial: 1. Documentary evidence (① personal information; ② ID cards of Tu A and Tang A; ③ application form; ④ description of circumstances; ⑤ prepayment receipt and medical diagnosis statement from the Central Hospital of a certain city); 2. Testimonies of witnesses Yu and Duan; 3. Statement of victim Liu; 4. Expert opinion: forensic appraisal report by the Judicial Appraisal Center of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; 5. Identification record; 6. Audiovisual materials; 7. Mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, and receipt; 8. Confessions and defenses of the defendants Tang and Tu.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that Liu (already convicted) lost money playing the fishing machine at 'Our Own Supermarket' at 658 Ganjiang Avenue in Ji'an County and sought trouble, leading to a dispute with the supermarket owner Zhou and the co-defendant He (already convicted), who placed the fishing machine. As a result, Liu asked co-defendant Zhou (wanted and at large) to mediate the issue, and the parties agreed to negotiate at the supermarket entrance. On May 27, 2016, around 2 PM, Zhou rallied the defendants Zhang, Luo, and eight others, who brought machetes and other tools, and they arrived at the agreed location in two cars. The co-defendant He (already convicted) also gathered his brothers He 2 (already convicted), He 3 (already convicted), He 4 (already convicted), He 5 (already convicted), and others at the location. After meeting, a conflict arose due to unsuccessful negotiations. Zhou and the defendants Zhang, Luo, and others retrieved machetes from their cars and pursued He and his group. In response, He's group also wielded machetes and metal pipes to join the fight. During the incident, He 2 retrieved an air gun from a car to intimidate Zhou's group, causing them to flee, and He's group chased them unsuccessfully and returned to the scene. Subsequently, He's group damaged the Toyota Highlander left at the scene with knives. During the melee, He, He 2, and He 3 sustained injuries. Medical evaluations determined these injuries to be minor. The damage to the car was assessed at", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that: 1. At approximately 3 a.m. on October 14, 2012, the defendants Liang and Wei, along with He and Wang (both handled in separate cases), and others, conspired and drove to Jindang Village in a certain town of a certain county, specifically to the \"Jinxi\" supermarket. They pried open the door and stole cash amounting to 22,000 RMB, as well as 25 cartons of cigarettes of \"Zhonghua,\" \"Liqun,\" \"Furong,\" and \"Dahongying\" brands, and a rice cooker. According to the appraisal, the value of the cigarettes was 4,916 RMB. After the incident, the families of defendants Liang and Wei compensated Jinxi supermarket for the economic loss with a total of 30,000 RMB on April 18, 2013, and obtained forgiveness. 2. In the afternoon, around 3 p.m., in late October 2012, defendant Liang, along with He and Wang (both handled in separate cases), went to Yip's food wholesale department at Langanqiao Village in a certain town of a certain county. They attempted to pry open the door but fled when the shop's alarm sounded. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Wei during the trial and are corroborated by their previous confessions, the statements of the victims Chen and Ye, household registration records, price appraisal reports, identification transcripts, on-site inspection transcripts, the account of the arrest, and payment proofs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: At approximately 11:30 PM on June 16, 2015, the defendant Fang had a verbal altercation with the parking lot attendant at a shopping center in a certain district of a certain city over a parking fee. Subsequently, Fang drove his car into the parking barrier and damaged it before leaving. At around 11:58 PM on June 16, 2015, the defendant Fang, along with Liu, Wang, Liu A (at large), \"Tian\", \"Lao Moumou\", and others, carrying iron pipes, machetes, and other tools, went to the parking lot of a shopping center in a certain district of a certain city. There, near the entrance of the parking lot, they injured the victims Li and Zhao and damaged the parking lot's fee booth before leaving by car. About an hour and a half later, the defendant Fang, again accompanied by Liu and \"Lao Moumou\", drove to the parking lot and chased and assaulted the victim Wang A. After evaluation, the injuries sustained by victim Li were classified as minor injuries of the second degree.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges are as follows: 1. On September 8, 2013, at approximately 8:20 AM, the defendants Niu and Feng, stole a victim Wang's satchel from an internet cafe in Xinhua District, a certain city, which contained 9,000 yuan in cash. 2. On November 4, 2013, at about 7:10 AM, the defendants Niu and Feng, stole a Gold GN106 model mobile phone from a victim Liu in an internet cafe in a certain district of a city, assessed at 877 yuan, and stole a Known CV28 model mobile phone from a victim Mao, assessed at 591 yuan. 3. On the morning of November 19, 2013, at about 8:00 AM, defendant Niu was discovered by victim Li while stealing Li's backpack at an internet cafe in Qiaoxi District, a certain city. The police apprehended Niu upon receiving the report. Defendant Niu truthfully confessed to the crime of theft carried out together with Feng at the internet cafes and informed the police that Feng was in a certain rental place. Based on the information provided by Niu, the police arrested Feng at that rental place. During the trial, defendants Niu and Feng jointly returned a total of 10,468 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Niu and Feng in court and were corroborated by the statements of victims Wang, Liu, and Mao, the testimony of witness Li, the list of seized and returned items, appraisal reports, photographs of the stolen goods and crime scene identification, household registration evidence, and evidence of the arrests, all of which are sufficient for a conclusive determination.", "label": {"Niu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yufeng District, Liuzhou City, Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged: On July 11, 2015, at around 11 PM, the defendant Lan, at the place where he resided in the second residential area of the Special Transformer Factory, Building 5, Unit 2, No. X, XX Road, Yufeng District, Liuzhou City, discovered that a Yadea electric scooter belonging to the victim Li (valued at 2,490 RMB as appraised) was in a powered state and not locked. After conspiring with the defendant Wu, Wu stole the electric scooter. Wu later sold the stolen scooter and profited 450 RMB, while Lan gained 200 RMB. The illegal gains have been squandered and cannot be recovered. On April 21, 2016, at around 2 PM, Wu voluntarily surrendered to the police under persuasion. On the same day, around 10 PM, the police arrested Lan in the second residential area of the Special Transformer Factory, No. 1, XXX Road, Yufeng District, Liuzhou City. During the trial of this case, Lan's family had already paid 1,245 RMB to this court as compensation for the victim Li's economic losses. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Wu and Lan during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the following evidence verified through court examination: the case registration form, decision to file a case, the victim Li's statement, the confessions of the defendants Wu and Lan, the purchase invoice, the electric scooter's driving license, the recognition record and identification photos, the appraisal entrustment form, the price appraisal conclusion, the price appraisal detailed form, the notification of the appraisal opinion, the arrest report, the situation explanation, the household registration information of the defendants Wu and Lan, Wu's previous criminal record, the household registration information of the victim Li, and others. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient to establish the conclusion.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused: 1. One noon at the end of April 2019, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver the methamphetamine parcel at the traffic light near Guang'an Experimental Primary School to a man (Lin). Li received a transfer of 300 yuan via WeChat from the other party. 2. On May 2nd or 3rd, 2019, one noon, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver the methamphetamine parcel at the traffic light near Guang'an Chengnan Experimental Primary School to Yu, and Yu paid 320 yuan in cash. 3. At about midnight on May 4th, 2019, Yu contacted the defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine. Since Li was out of town, he instructed his wife Liu to deliver two methamphetamine parcels outside the Siyuan Hospital in the Chengbei District of Guang'an to Yu, and Li received a transfer of 500 yuan via WeChat from the other party. Around 15:00 on May 27th, 2019, the police arrested the defendants Li and Liu near the Haorenjia Supermarket in Chengbei, Guang'an. To establish the above facts, the prosecution presented documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the confessions and defenses of the defendants; and identification records, among other evidence.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of December 25, 2014, Dong bought cumin beef, boiled meat slices, and scrambled eggs with tomatoes from the \"Yikouxian\" restaurant operated by Xu. His wife, Zhang, exhibited symptoms of poisoning after consuming the above dishes and was taken to Bazhong Central Hospital for treatment. On December 26, 2014, Zhang was diagnosed with acute nitrite poisoning by Bazhong Central Hospital. It was found that the chef at \"Yikouxian\" restaurant, Wang, had added nitrite purchased by the owner Xu to the beef for marination while preparing the cumin beef. On December 28, 2014, the Bazhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention sampled the leftover packaged dishes eaten by Zhang and others, and the test concluded that the nitrite content in the cumin beef sample was 886mg/kg. After the incident, defendants Xu and Wang compensated Zhang and obtained her forgiveness. In support of the above charges, the prosecution provided: the criminal case registration form, the decision to file the case, the victim Zhang's statement, expert opinions, basic personal information, medical records, discharge certificate, individual business license, and other relevant documents, as well as the confessions of defendants Xu and Wang.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 10 p.m. on May 17, 2014, Huang, Rao Yi, Gao, Shao (all have been sentenced) and others had a dispute with a KTV staff member named Fan over trivial matters in the Venus KTV of Jinjiang Hotel, Xushan Street, Cixi City. Subsequently, the KTV staff, including the defendants Shen, Chen, and Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, Chen Chao (all have been sentenced), engaged in a melee with the other party using baseball bats, fists, and kicks, causing injuries to both parties. According to forensic identification, the victim Shao’s injuries were classified as severe injuries of the second degree, the co-defendant Yao A’s injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, and the injuries sustained by victims Huang, Rao Yi, as well as co-defendants Hu B, Yu A, were classified as minor injuries. After being brought to account, the defendants Shen and Chen truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. Following the incident, the defendants Shen and Chen, along with co-defendants Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, and Chen Chao, compensated the victim Shao for economic losses and obtained the victim Shao's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Shen and Chen during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by the testimonies of co-defendants Hu A, Zeng Huan, Yao B, Yu B, Zhao Qi, Guan Qing, Shi, Chen Chao, statements of victims Huang, Rao Yi, Gao, Shao, testimonies of witnesses Fan, Feng, Shen Hong, Luo, Rao Jia, Lü, Ye, as well as the identification records, search records, seizure documents and photos, scene photos, medical records and injury photos, forensic evaluation reports on the degree of human injury, mediation records, receipts, letters of forgiveness, this court’s criminal judgments No. 1465, 1466 (2014) Yong Ci Criminal First Instance, the arrest process, and identification documents of the defendants Shen and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between April 11 and April 20, 2014, defendants Kang and Hu, under the guise of private detectives assisting the victim, Yu, in investigating an extramarital affair, fraudulently obtained a total of 24,800 RMB from the victim, Yu, by demanding investigation fees and a security deposit. After the crime was committed, the families of the defendants Kang and Hu returned all the illicit money, which has been restituted to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Kang and Hu during the trial and are substantiated by their household registration certificates, list and photos of seized items, chat record photos, mobile text message photos, bank transaction details, Alipay transaction records, call records, refund proof, receipt; arrest process and situation explanation provided by police authorities; the statement of the victim Yu; testimony of the witness He; identification record and photos, search record; the confessions and defenses of defendants Kang and Hu and other evidence, sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that defendants Xu and Yao, in September 2013, arrived at a certain district and checked into Room 210 of the Jinlongwan Hotel at a certain location. The two conspired for defendant Xu to lure men to a rented room on the fourth floor of China Construction Bank, located on Jiefang Middle Road in a certain district of a certain city, for massages, while Yao would take the opportunity to steal from the men who came for massages. Specifically: 1. Around 8 PM on October 26, 2013, defendant Xu brought victim Mo to the rented room for a massage. During this time, Xu used her body to block Mo’s line of sight, allowing defendant Yao to enter the room and search Mo's clothing. After stealing cash from victim Mo, defendant Yao left the rented room and called Xu to inform her, upon which Xu made an excuse to leave. After successfully leaving the scene, the two returned to their hotel. After counting, it was found that Mo had been robbed of 4,700 yuan in cash. Defendant Yao received 2,700 yuan, and Xu received 2,000 yuan. 2. Around 8 PM on November 13, 2013, defendant Xu brought victim Lai to the rented room for a massage, again using her body to block the victim’s line of sight, while defendant Yao seized the opportunity to steal Lai’s property. After successfully stealing, defendant Yao informed Xu by phone. Police officers, who arrived on the scene due to reports of prostitution in the rented room, discovered Xu and Lai and arrested them. As police were leaving the", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: On August 1, 2013, at approximately 12:00, defendants Zhou and Min agreed to a drug transaction with Zhang via telephone. Subsequently, Zhou and Min went to the vicinity of the Meiyan Cosmetics Store in Liulian Village, Qiansuo Street, in a certain district of a certain city, where they sold 0.87 grams of heroin to Zhang. Later, Zhou and Min were apprehended by police officers near the Guizhou Beef and Lamb Noodle Shop in Liulian Village, and 2.62 grams of heroin were seized from Zhou. During the trial, defendants Zhou and Min raised no objections to the above facts. The facts are also supported by evidence such as photographs of the heroin, mobile phones, lists of seized and returned items, the statement of the buyer Zhang, testimony of the witness Miao, records of searches, inspections, and identifications, detailed call records, the process of the arrest, and the forensic examination report, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Min": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendants Cao and Xu, after conspiring with Wang (handled in a separate case), on October 16, 2014, at around 17:00, at the north side of the entrance to the Xicheng Office in the Mudan District of Heze City, the defendants Cao and Wang, without cause, engaged in acts of provocation, using a machete to injure the victim Fan on the leg and back. They then escaped the scene in a gray \"Ford\" sedan driven by Xu, who was waiting to assist them. According to the appraisal, the victim Fan's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. The prosecuting authority provided corresponding evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges that defendant Gao, during his tenure from 2007 to 2011, violated regulations in the process of collecting pension security funds from construction enterprises. He was grossly negligent in his duties and failed to perform his responsibilities diligently, resulting in a shortfall of 507,542.2 yuan in pension security funds that should have been collected from relevant construction entities in a timely and adequate manner, causing significant losses to the state and enterprises. Defendant Wang, during his tenure from 2007 to 2011, also violated regulations while processing, reviewing, and issuing construction permits. He was grossly negligent in his duties and failed to perform his responsibilities diligently. Despite the pension security funds from the relevant construction enterprises not being paid in full and on time, he proceeded to process and issue construction project permits, causing significant losses to the state and enterprises. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing. There is documentary evidence such as the household registration certificates of the two defendants, a special receipt for pension security funds from construction enterprises in a certain province, application procedures for the issuance of construction permits from relevant construction entities, personnel appointment and removal notices from the Xian County Human Resources Bureau, and related documents from the Ministry of Construction, a certain province, and a certain city on the collection of labor insurance fees from construction enterprises, as well as witness testimonies from Cao and Yang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gao": [], "Wang": []}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On November 26, 2019, defendant Wu called defendant Zou to purchase 400 yuan worth of drugs, including methamphetamine tablets and crystal meth, and transferred 400 yuan to Zou via WeChat. Zou spent 400 yuan in a certain district to purchase two methamphetamine tablets and some crystal meth from \"Grandma\" (Wang, who is being handled in a separate case). After purchasing the drugs, Zou drove to a newly built center in a certain district to meet with Wu. After the meeting, Wu and Ou got into Zou's car, and the three of them, Wu, Zou, and Ou, consumed the drugs together in Zou's car. On November 30, 2019, around 12 noon, drug user Ou contacted defendant Wu to request the purchase of 460 yuan worth of methamphetamine tablets and crystal meth and transferred 460 yuan to Wu via WeChat. Wu contacted defendant Zou to purchase the drugs and transferred 430 yuan to Zou via WeChat, making a profit of 30 yuan. Zou drove to a certain district in a certain city to find \"Grandma\" and spent 400 yuan to purchase two methamphetamine tablets and some crystal meth, making a profit of 30 yuan. Subsequently, near Ou's apartment in a certain district in a certain city, Zou handed over the drugs to Wu and then left. Wu was apprehended by the Public Security Bureau on the spot while handing over the drugs to Ou. On December 1, 2019, defendant Zou was arrested and brought to justice by the Donghu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. On November 30, 2019, defendant Wu was arrested and brought to justice by the Donghu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution read out and presented in court the testimony of witness Ou, on-site inspection reports, identification records, the process of the case being solved, population information, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Zou and Wu, among other evidence.", "label": {"Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on March 31, 2014, at around 22:00, the defendants, Bao and Cai, carried tools such as a saw, a wrench, and pliers, and rode a motorcycle to the construction site of phase 2 of Jinshayuan Public Rental Housing in Sha County. They stole three bundles of copper core coils (valued at 11,380 RMB) from a transformer at the site. In the early morning of the following day, defendant Bao was apprehended while fleeing the scene. On August 26, 2014, defendant Cai was captured and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. The stolen three bundles of copper core coils have been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Bao and Cai during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Jiang, Huang, Lin, and Yao, the valuation conclusion from the Sha County Price Certification Center, the on-site inspection records and photos from the Sha County Public Security Bureau, the identification records and photos at the scene, the account of the apprehension process, the crime solving process, the list of seized items, the household registration certificates, and the criminal judgments from the Yanping District People's Court of Nanping City, Fujian Province (2011) Yan Xing Chu Zi No. 5 and the Sha County People's Court (2012) Sha Xing Chu Zi No. 24, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Bao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: At around 11 a.m. on May 5, 2015, in a residential area of a certain county, the defendants Yue and Bai, together with Bai A (handled in a separate case), engaged in a dispute and subsequent altercation with Ling B and his son Ling A over whether they could drive away a sedan. During the altercation, the defendants Yue and Bai, along with others, caused minor injuries to Ling A's nose and minor injuries to the eyes of both Ling A and Ling B.", "label": {"Yue": ["Imprisonment"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3:00 PM on November 19, 2013, Zhang called the defendant Zhou to request the purchase of drugs. The defendant Ye answered the phone and informed Zhou of the situation. At approximately 4:30 PM that day, when Zhang arrived downstairs at Unit 1, No. 32, District West, Meiwan, a town in a certain city district, he called Zhou again to request purchasing drugs worth 70 RMB, specifically methamphetamine. Ye answered the phone and informed Zhou. Subsequently, Zhou came downstairs carrying a packet of drugs and sold it to Zhang for 70 RMB. As the transaction was completed, both were caught on the scene by police officers. The police confiscated a bag of white crystalline substance from Zhang (which, upon identification, was found to contain methamphetamine, weighing 0.43 grams), and 70 RMB of drug money was seized from defendant Zhou. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhou and Ye during the trial and were corroborated by the testimony and identification record of witness Zhang, defendant Ye's confession during the investigation phase, defendant Zhou's confession and identification record during the investigation phase, their apprehension process, search warrant and search records, seizure list, photographs of drugs, drug money, and tools used in the crime, crime scene photos, on-site urine test report, situation statement, case explanation, mobile phone call records, criminal judgment and release certification, compulsory rehabilitation decision, police administrative penalty decision, physico-chemical examination reports, residence registration documents, and other evidentiary materials that are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charges: At about 23:30 on October 20, 2014, at the intersection of Xihe Road and Huaihai Road in Santikou, Suixi County, Huang (some person) was driving a Honda Accord with the license plate Wan F××××× and made a right turn from west to south when the victim, Zhang B (another person), blocked the car and insulted Huang. Wu, one of the defendants in the Honda, had a dispute with Zhang B. When the defendants Li and Yu heard the situation and arrived, the three defendants used their fists and feet to injure Zhang B. According to a forensic assessment, the degree of Zhang B's injuries was classified as minor injury level two. Additionally, it was found that on November 5, 2014, Wu, Li, and Yu compensated Zhang B for economic losses amounting to 85,000 yuan. The two parties reached a settlement, which has been fulfilled, and Zhang B expressed understanding towards the actions of Wu, Li, and Yu. On November 12, 2014, the defendant Wu was arrested by the Huaibei Public Security Bureau. On November 14 of the same year, defendants Li and Yu voluntarily turned themselves in to the Suixi County Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, all three defendants confessed to the criminal facts. In court, defendants Wu, Li, and Yu did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which have been sufficiently substantiated by the dispatch of police incident registration, the course of events for the defendants being brought to justice, household registration information, the forensic assessment opinion, the victim Zhang B's statement, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Zhang A (another person), and Zhu (another person), as well as the agreement and receipt.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from 2011 to 2014, the defendants Yan, He, Shao, Feng, and Qu and Hou (the latter two are being handled in a separate case) took advantage of their positions to embezzle and appropriate a total of 360,000 RMB in public funds. In March 2015, defendants He, Shao, and Feng took advantage of their positions to embezzle and appropriate an additional total of 90,000 RMB in public funds.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Hebei Province charges: At around 23:00 on June 15, 2014, the defendants Liang and Mo, together with Li (under arrest and at large) and Hua (true identity unknown, currently at large), without any reason, assaulted Lu and Yang A in front of the Binguoyuan Supermarket on Cha Yuan Street in Yutian Town, a certain county, causing injuries to Lu and Yang A. According to the North China Forensic Identification Institute of Tangshan City, Lu's injuries were classified as minor injuries. According to the Forensic Medical Appraisal Center of a certain county, Yang A's injuries were minor. The evidence provided by the prosecution includes: the confession records of the defendants Liang and Mo; the statement records of the victims Lu and Yang A; the testimony records of witnesses Yang B, Dong, and Huang Liu; the on-site inspection records; the identification records; forensic injury assessment reports; household registration certificates, etc.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment"], "Mo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the morning of December 6, 2012, defendants Li and Zhang went together to the entrance of No. 3 gate of the Dongfeng Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. on Linjiang Street in a certain district of a certain city. They had an argument with Zheng over the issue of defendant Li's job assignment. Subsequently, defendants Zhang and Li punched and kicked Zheng, resulting in multiple lumbar vertebrae (transverse process) fractures, with the degree of injury constituting minor injuries. On March 26, 2013, defendants Zhang and Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the joint crime as described above. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Li made financial compensation to the victim, Zheng. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Li during the court proceedings. Furthermore, they were corroborated by the victim Zheng's statements and identification records, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Xu, and Gao, an account of the incident, an explanatory note on the circumstances, a description of how defendants Zhang and Li were brought to justice, on-site investigation materials, a list of seized items, a return receipt, an evidence collection list, forensic medical injury assessment reports, public security administrative penalty decisions, and the household registration certificates of defendants Zhang and Li, which provide sufficient grounds for the determination.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that between September 10 and September 18, 2015, the defendants Chen and Chou used bird nets and other means by their own fish pond, located to the west of a certain place in Hengliang Community, Hengliang Subdistrict, a certain district of a certain city, to capture a total of 28 birds. According to the appraisal, among the captured birds were 2 night herons, 3 mynas, 2 black-tailed grosbeaks, 1 Eurasian magpie, 1 light-vented bulbul, 1 hoopoe, and 17 spotted doves, all of which are animals protected by the state either for being beneficial or having significant economic or scientific research value (known as \"three have\" animals). On September 18, 2015, the defendants Chen and Chou were apprehended by public security authorities and brought to justice. After being taken into custody, both truthfully confessed the above criminal facts, and the 28 captured birds have been seized by the public security authorities. It was further found that among the 28 birds captured by defendants Chen and Chou, 8 were already dead, and the remaining 20 have been released into the wild. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Chou during the court hearing and are corroborated by the defendants' previous confessions and defenses, the testimony of a witness named Huang, seizure order, the \"Three Have\" Protected Animal List, inspection records, identification records, physical evidence appraisal report, and other evidence. There are also records of the case registration and the process of the defendants Chen and Chou being brought to justice, proving the circumstances of the case's discovery and the apprehension of defendants Chen and Chou; household registration data shows that defendants Chen and Chou possess full criminal responsibility capability and other natural circumstances.", "label": {"Chen": ["Fine"], "Chou": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on April 29, 2014, the defendant Gong stole three blank \"Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)\" duplicates at a certain city's Hongshan District Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision and Inspection Station. Later, according to defendant Wei's request, Gong filled out one of them with the certificate number 4200093329 and sold it to Wei for 150 RMB. Wei subsequently provided this forged certificate to others for use. Later, the defendants Gong and Wei were apprehended by public security personnel. Neither defendant Gong, defendant Wei, nor their defense attorneys objected to the criminal facts and charges in the indictment. Wei's defense attorney argued that Wei was a first-time and occasional offender, usually well-behaved; he confessed voluntarily with a good attitude; the crime was less serious and posed little social harm, thus requesting the court to show leniency in sentencing. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the materials issued by the Hongshan Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, including the details of the arrest and investigation; the report materials; witness testimony of Hu; the seizure decision; a copy of the forged \"Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)\"; the original duplicate of the \"Animal Quarantine Certificate (Product A)\"; the proof and situation explanation provided by the city's Hongshan District Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision and Inspection Station and the city's Hongshan District Food and Drug Administration, among other materials; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Gong and Wei. This evidence is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Gong": [], "Wei": []}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On October 11, 2015, the defendants Gao and Yang went to the hallway of * Tao Xiang Yuan, Yangshan Town, a district of a certain city, and used a pushing method to steal a Yamaha motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Moujia. The item was valued at 600 RMB. In mid-November 2015, the defendants Gao and Yang went to the entrance of * Tangqiao, the same district of a certain city, and used a pushing method to steal a New Century Yuanhao motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Mouyi. The item was valued at 500 RMB. After hiding the motorcycles, the two went again to the entrance of * Tangqiao, where they used a pushing method to steal a Haojue motorcycle belonging to the victim, Zhang Moubing. The item was valued at 1100 RMB. After the case was solved, the aforementioned three motorcycles were returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Gao and Yang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhang Moujia, Zhang Mouyi, Zhang Moubing, the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Dong, the identification records, the list of seized and returned items, call records, certificates of conformity, invoices, the price appraisal conclusion, explanatory notes, the account of the arrest, the investigation of the criminal case, and the defendants’ criminal records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged: In the early morning of August 2, 2014, the defendant Yong had an argument with Zhuang over trivial matters at the Kelly Commune Community, Meicun Street, New District, Wuxi City. Yong then gathered defendants Chen, Wang, He, and others with steel pipes and other tools to the scene. A scuffle ensued between the parties, during which defendant Yong used knuckle dusters, and defendants Chen, He, Wang, and others used steel pipes to hit victim Zhuang on the head and other parts of the body, causing head injuries to Zhuang. According to the assessment, the injury constituted a Grade 1 minor injury. On September 3, 2014, the aforementioned four defendants were apprehended by the public security authorities, and later, defendants Chen, Yong, and He truthfully confessed to their crimes.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Yong": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Defendant Cheng illegally possessed a homemade firearm left by his ancestors without obtaining a gun permit. On February 25, 2016, police officers from Miaogao Police Station of a county public security bureau, holding inspection permits, found this homemade firearm at Cheng's home, located at No. 11, Wuzhuang, Miaogao Street, a certain village in the county. After appraisal, the firearm was identified as a gun powered by gunpowder to fire projectiles and was lethal. In July 2014, defendant Zou illegally possessed a hunting rifle without obtaining a gun permit and later handed it over to defendant Cheng for safekeeping and use. On February 17, 2016, defendant Zou, along with Zhou, Wu, and Lei Jia (all handled in separate cases), went hunting on the mountain at \"Fenglukou\" in a certain village of Miaogao Street, using the hunting rifle to kill a wild boar. On February 25, 2016, officers from Miaogao Police Station of a certain county public security bureau, holding inspection permits, discovered the hunting rifle in the village collective warehouse next to Cheng's home at No. 11, Wuzhuang, Miaogao Street. After appraisal, this hunting rifle was identified as a gun powered by gunpowder to fire projectiles and was lethal. On February 25, 2016, defendants Cheng and Zou were summoned by the public security authorities and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. These facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng and Zou during the trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Lan, Zhou, Lei Yi, Wu, Lei Jia; the confessions and defenses of defendants Cheng and Zou; the evidence preservation decision and list, the seizure decision and list with photos; the inspection record and on-site photos; the item transfer list; the appraisal documents and opinions of firearms and ammunition identified as Ligungun Appraisal [2016] No. 14 and No. 18; the criminal judgment No. 10 (2009) Lisui Criminal First Instance; the process of being brought to justice; and the household registration certificates of defendants Cheng and Zou, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: In the early morning of November 4, 2014, defendant Xu had an argument over the phone with the victim, Gao, due to a trivial matter. Subsequently, the victim Gao asked the defendant Xu to meet in a certain town in this city. Defendant Xu then assembled defendant Qin, Zhu, and Li, Wang (both handled in separate cases) to go to A Er Noodle Shop near the large roundabout in that town. They used wooden sticks they had brought with them to fight with the victim Gao, who was armed with a kitchen knife. Defendants Xu, Qin, Zhu, and others beat the victim Gao, causing injuries. According to the Tongxiang City Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, the injuries sustained by the victim Gao constituted minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, defendant Qin surrendered to the public security organs on November 27, 2014, and defendant Zhu surrendered on December 4, 2014. It has also been found that the victim Gao and defendants Xu, Qin, Zhu reached an agreement on civil compensation, with the three defendants compensating 30,000 yuan, which has been fully paid. The victim Gao has issued a letter of understanding.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that between September 19, 2020, and September 22, 2020, the defendants Song, Wang, and Yu conspired to gain illegal profits. Song registered an account on a gambling website to act as an agent for the site, set up a WeChat group, and operated the \"Jilin Keno\" (illegal lottery), soliciting gamblers by inviting individuals to join the WeChat group. They organized over 30 WeChat friends to join this group and received illegal lottery bets from gamblers via WeChat transfers. Yu was hired to place the gamblers' betting content and amounts on the website based on the information from the WeChat group. The three of them, in a certain city of a certain province, in ** Building, received a total of RMB 66,306 in illegal lottery bets from gamblers via Alipay. Song and Wang earned a total of RMB 20,000 in rebate profits from the site (which were not withdrawn), and Yu received a commission of RMB 1,000. After the incident, the defendants Song, Wang, and Yu were summoned, confessed to their criminal acts, and voluntarily surrendered all their illegal gains. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Song, Wang, and Yu during the court trial, supported by evidence including gambling transaction screenshots involving Liu, WeChat and Alipay transaction screenshots involving Zhang, WeChat and transfer transaction screenshots involving Leng, the seizure decision and inventory list from the Chuanying Branch of Jilin City Public Security Bureau, screenshots of accounts related to the gambling website, information within the involved gambling network platform, Alipay account screenshot information involved, detailed screenshots of Alipay transfer records, detailed transaction records of bank card number 6216690600005657687 under Lang’s name, and more. There is also corroborating evidence from detailed information queries of the household population data, phone query records, and the criminal verdict included in the case file, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, the following facts were established: On the evening of December 7, 2014, defendant Wang had a dispute with Lin over trivial matters. Consequently, defendant Wang gathered defendants Xiang, Jiang, Zou, Jiang, and Chen 1, Lei (each handled in separate cases), among others, with the intention to fight Lin. In the early hours of the next day, defendant Wang assembled defendants Xiang, Jiang, Zou, Jiang, and Chen 1, Lei, among others, and drove a car to the vicinity of the traffic lights at the certain county's hot spring tunnel. They prepared knives and other tools for the crime after obscuring the vehicle's license plate in advance and then drove the car to Beiling New District to look for Lin and others. Defendants Wang, Xiang, Jiang, Zou, Jiang, and Chen 1, Lei, and others, driving at the traffic lights near the mouth of the hot spring tunnel, encountered Lu, Lin’s girlfriend, driving a Mercedes-Benz car with the license plate of a certain place G×××××. They then pursued the car, with defendant Xiang driving a Mitsubishi car in the opposite direction to a certain county's Hongma Hotel traffic lights, intercepting the Mercedes-Benz driven by Lu. Subsequently, defendant Wang and Chen 1, among others, used knives and other tools to smash and slash the Mercedes-Benz before driving away from the scene. After the defendants Wang, Zou, Xiang, Jiang, Jiang, and Chen 1, Lei, had finished smashing the Mercedes-Benz, they made contact by phone and then drove a car to meet at a certain village in a certain town in the county. During this time, they spotted a Ford car driven by Peng passing through the village in a certain town and suspected that it was a car tailing Lin, subsequently pursuing the Ford. Defendants Wang, Xiang, Zou, among others, caught up with the Ford car with the license plate of a certain place G××××× driven by Peng in an open area of a certain village in a certain town and blocked it. Then, defen", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Zhao, Yu, and Wang had no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. The defense counsel for defendant Zhao argued that: 1. Zhao voluntarily confessed after being taken into custody; 2. Testing showed that the quality of the pork carcasses sold by Zhao met national standards, indicating relatively minor social harm; 3. Zhao is a first-time offender with no criminal record. Therefore, a request was made for leniency in Zhao's sentencing.\n\nUpon trial, it was established that since May 2013, defendant Zhao, in collaboration with his wife defendant Yu, had been purchasing live pigs from local farmers and illegally setting up pig slaughtering operations at their home in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city, without obtaining the necessary slaughter permits and licenses. By the end of 2014, the defendants hired defendant Wang to help with the slaughtering and sold the resulting pork carcasses, pork offal, and pig skins without inspection a", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From February to early March 2020, defendants Chen and Yang collaborated to set up a gambling den in the woods north of the Jinlong Bay construction site in Wangcheng Town, Xinjian District, and inside a shed at a construction site diagonally across from Zhonghuqing Elderly Apartment in Xinjian District. They provided Pai Gow and gambling tools for people to gamble. Each session involved ten to twenty people gambling in the form of \"Pai Gow.\" During the gambling process, defendants Chen and Yang extracted profits from the gamblers by \"banking,\" taking a cut of the stakes. The two made a profit of approximately RMB 20,000. On March 5, 2020, defendant Chen was arrested by the police; on March 9, 2020, defendant Yang voluntarily turned himself in to the police. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented and read in court testimonies from witnesses Xia and Deng1, identification records, seizure lists, seizure decision documents, confiscation item lists, administrative penalty decisions, account of the case, demographic information, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Yang.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on the afternoon of June 15, 2012, around 3:00 PM, defendant Luo had a dispute with defendant Zhang while gambling by rolling dice, which led to resentment. After the gambling ended, defendant Luo collaborated with two men and drove to the entrance of Jiahe Baosui foot bath shop on Heping South Road in Pujiang County. After getting out of the car, they respectively chased and attacked defendant Zhang with a machete and a club. Zhang later managed to escape. That evening, Luo along with Wang B (dealt with in a separate case), Wang A, and others gathered at the south side of Heping Bridge, Milan Holiday Hotel, and downstairs at Pujiang Building intending to fight defendant Zhang. At the same time, defendant Zhang was gathering people at Lao Zai Dou Lao shop on Yuequan West Road in Puyang Street and prepared tools such as \"wild spears,\" stones, etc., intending to fight Luo and others. However, both parties were dispersed and stopped in time by police officers from the Pujiang County Public Security Bureau. During the court trial, defendants Luo and Zhang did not dispute these facts. Additionally, the testimonies and defenses of Wang B (dealt with in a separate case), Zhu, and Zuo; witness statements from Wang A, Chen A, Huang, Chen B, Mao, Wang B, and Li; identification records and photos; defendant Luo's criminal record; identification documents of the two defendants; and details of their capture all serve as sufficient evidence for this determination.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the morning of June 9, 2014, defendants Wei and Chang colluded and went to a rental house on the north side of a certain number at Shuangfeng Second Lane in Haichang Street, a city. They entered by slipping through the door and stole an OPPO U525 mobile phone belonging to the victim, Luo, valued at 130 yuan. After the incident, the public security authorities recovered the stolen property and returned it to the victim. Furthermore, it was found that after being brought to justice, defendant Wei assisted the public security authorities in apprehending the accomplice. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Wei and Chang during the trial, and they were corroborated by the victim's statement, witness testimonies, appraisal opinions on the value of the item, a list of evidence received, a list of returned items, identification records and photos, on-site inspection records and photos, the criminal judgment, certificate of release after serving the sentence, merit recognition opinion, arrest details, household registration certificate, and permanent resident information, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in February 2019, the defendant Zhong, upon learning of her pregnancy, wished to \"give up\" her child for adoption to others. She met Lan and Chen, a childless couple (both handled in a separate case), through a certain QQ chat group. Subsequently, Zhong and Lan discussed the \"adoption\" arrangements multiple times via QQ and WeChat. During this time, Zhong suggested that Lan and Chen pay a \"nutrition compensation fee\" of 60,000 yuan. After the parties reached an agreement, defendant Wang expressed his consent. At 9:22 a.m. on October 11, 2019, Zhong successfully gave birth to a baby boy (Zhong A) at the city's Third People's Hospital. At around 9 p.m. the same day, defendants Zhong and Wang asked Lan and Chen to meet in an alley on Gongshang Street in a district of the city. After Lan and Chen paid Zhong and Wang 60,000 yuan, they took the baby boy away. Zhong and Wang then used the money to pay off debts, recharge games, and other expenses. On October 12, 2", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that in 2013, the defendant Wang purchased 50 boxes of \"Jiang's Jianwei Xiaoshi Tablets\" from a stranger for 100 yuan in the health product distribution store where he worked. Wang then resold some of these medicines at a markup to the defendant Li, who further marked up the price and sold them to the first clinics of Beisuzha Village in Dengzhuang Township, Soshuikou Village, and the second clinic of Liuzhong Village in a certain district of a city. On March 5, 2014, the Municipal Food and Drug Administration conducted a sample inspection of the drugs at the first clinic of Beisuzha Village in Dengzhuang Township. Nine boxes of Jiang's Jianwei Xiaoshi Tablets sold by Li to this clinic were sampled and identified as not meeting national standards and deemed counterfeit drugs. After the incident, the defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed the above facts. During the trial, neither of the defendants disputed these facts. The facts are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Qin, Song, and Wei, photos of the involved drugs, identification records, and the inspection report from the Municipal Food and Drug Testing Center, which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Long, upon learning about a method to purchase \"V Coins,\" \"Q Coins,\" and other virtual currencies by making unauthorized phone calls, approached the vagrant defendant Cui and the suspect Yao (processed in a separate case). Long incited them to make unauthorized phone calls to purchase virtual currencies and provided Cui and Yao with 10 telephones each, instructing them to make these calls from the telephone booths in Jinbi Garden on Xixiang Avenue, Bao'an District, in a certain city. After Cui and Yao acquired the virtual currencies, Long would then repurchase them at a lower price. On December 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 13th, 15th, and 16th of 2013, the defendant Cui and the suspect Yao repeatedly made unauthorized calls in Jinbi Garden, resulting in a phone bill loss of 1,032 yuan. In the early hours of December 18, 2013, a telecommunications company employee caught the defendant Cui at the scene, and on December 25, 2013, the defendant Long was apprehended, with 14 phones used for the crime seized. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Long and Cui during the trial and are corroborated by relevant evidence verified and authenticated during the trial, which is sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charges that on September 17, 2015, at around 10 a.m., Li, together with Ma, Qi, Wang (who is at large), and others, injured Li Bing in a certain location over a trivial matter. Forensic identification determined the injury to be of a minor degree, level two. On April 8, 2015, at a construction site in a certain location, Qi injured Kang during the relocation of items, and it was identified as a minor injury, level two. The prosecution presented corresponding evidence, requesting that the three defendants be held criminally liable for x offense under article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. It also stated that defendant Li is a repeat offender, and defendants Ma and Qi voluntarily surrendered. After the incident, the three defendants compensated the victims for economic losses and received forgiveness. It is recommended that defendants Li and Qi be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of between six months and one year and six months, and defendant Ma to fixed-term imprisonment of between six months and one year. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial and were substantiated by the statements of victims Li Bing and Kang, the testimonies of witnesses Li Jia, Zhang Jia, Liu Jia, Li Yi, Shen, Cao, Chen, Zhang Yi, Liu Yi, Jia, identification records, injury assessment opinions, household registration documents, previous conviction judgments, and a case-solving process, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Qi": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: In the lunar calendar month of January 2014, defendant Chen asked defendant Li where there was something to steal. Defendant Li responded that there was an electric tricycle parked at the house of his fellow villager, Xu, and suggested that after Chen stole it, he could sell the battery from the electric vehicle to Li. Defendant Li then took defendant Chen to the victim Xu's home to scout the location and pointed out the room where the electric tricycle was stored. On the night of February 8, 2014, defendant Chen, along with Qiu (handled in a separate case), went to a rented house in a certain village in the street town of a certain county, where Xu lived. They used a crowbar to pry open the shutter door of the rented house, and stole a green Tianqi brand tricycle, scrap iron and copper, and a two-wheeled electric vehicle from inside the house. Afterward, defendant Chen dismantled the batteries from the two electric vehicles and sold them, along with the scrap iron and copper, to defendant Li for 1,000 RMB. According to the appraisal, the stolen tricycle was valued at 2,200 RMB, the scrap iron at 80 RMB, and the scrap copper at 36 RMB, while the value of the two-wheeled electric vehicle could not be determined. On March 28, 2014, defendant Li compensated the victim Xu for economic losses totaling over 5,000 RMB, gaining the victim’s understanding. These facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Li during the court hearings, and are supported by the confessions of the two defendants on record, the victim Xu's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Chen and Qiu, the \"Identification Record,\" the \"On-Site Inspection Record,\" the \"Price Appraisal Conclusion,\" the \"Letter of Understanding,\" the \"Explanation of Previous Offenses and Bad Conduct Check,\" the \"Criminal Judgment,\" the \"Administrative Punishment Decision,\" the \"Course of Arrest,\" the \"Household Registration Certificate,\" among other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 20:00 on September 26, 2015, on the road west of Century Square in Dancheng County, Yu, Wei and others, under the pretense of finding fault, assaulted Song near the entrance of Le Gou Arcade. It was determined that Song sustained minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, Yu, Wei, and others compensated the victim, Song, who expressed understanding and forgiveness. The above facts were undisputed by Yu, Wei, and others during the court hearing. Additionally, these facts were confirmed by the testimony of victim Song, witnesses Ji, Yang, Xu, recognition records, surveillance video footage, the forensic medical report on the extent of bodily harm, injury photos, a statement from Dancheng Digital Video Network Co., Ltd., the Dancheng County Public Security Bureau's organized crime investigation team's arrest report, a statement from the organized crime investigation team of the Dancheng County Public Security Bureau, the mediation agreement, and the household registration certificates of Yu, Wei, and others, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: On February 15, 2015, at around 13:00, defendant Sun, due to a debt dispute with the victim Wu, instructed defendant Wei and four other men (including Lin, who is being handled in a separate case) to forcibly take the victim Wu in a manner involving using a scarf to strangle his neck at the Cangnan County Vehicle Management Office. They forced him into a car and took him to various locations such as a certain mountain, village, and town in a certain county, restricting his personal freedom. During this period, the victim Wu was beaten by defendant Sun and others (confirmed by examination to be minor injuries). At around 00:00 on February 16, 2015, after taking the victim Wu's property deeds and other documents, defendant Sun released him. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Sun and Wei during the trial, and are corroborated by the statement of the victim Wu, the testimony of witness Lin, the account of the facts regarding Sun's illegal detention case, the incident report, outpatient medical records and injury photos, phone call logs, vehicle records and travel logs, civil verdict, criminal verdict and certificate of release after serving the sentence, forensic identification of the degree of physical injury, inspection records, identification records, synchronized audio and video recordings, arrest process, and household registration information, which are sufficient to conclude.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Fushan District, a certain city in Shandong Province, charged that defendants Chi and Hao, on August 7, 2014, at around 1 a.m., sneaked into the northwest corner of the second floor of the west apartment building at a construction site on Huifu Street, Fushan District of the city. Taking advantage of the night when no one was present, they stole fourteen aluminum profiles. According to the appraisal, the stolen goods were valued at 5,208 RMB. The public prosecution authority provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the alleged criminal facts.", "label": {"Chi": ["Fine"], "Hao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at the end of February 2016, the defendant Xie, with the help of the defendant Zheng, opened an unnamed massage parlor at the Tangqiao parking lot in Yaohai District, Hefei City. In early March, the defendant Jin was hired by the establishment. The three defendants conspired together, with the defendants Xie and Jin covering for each other while stealing money from customers during massages, and defendant Zheng acted as a lookout. The stolen money was divided proportionally among them. On the morning of March 19, 2016, the victim Li went to the massage parlor for a massage. The defendant Xie was responsible for massaging and chatting with Li to distract him, while the defendant Jin stole the victim's wallet from his clothes pocket, taking 5,700 yuan in cash. After discovering the theft, Li had an argument with the defendant Xie and simultaneously called the police. Zheng, who was acting as a lookout at the door, entered the shop to try to mediate. The police arrived on the scene after the report and arrested the defendants Xie, Jin, and Zheng, and recovered the stolen cash of 5,700 yuan from defendant Jin. After the incident, the police returned the stolen funds to the victim. The facts established in the trial are consistent with those alleged by the prosecution. The defendants Xie, Jin, and Zheng had no objection to these facts during the trial, which are corroborated by evidence such as the seizure decision, the seizure and return inventory, photos identifying the stolen money, the account of their capture, household registration information, the police report, inquiry certificate, letter of understanding, identification records, and the statement of the victim Li. This evidence is sufficient to substantiate the facts.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, from June 26 to 27, 2015, the defendant He instructed the defendant Jin to rent room 401 of the New Venus Hotel in Haishu District of this city, and organized Yang, Chen A, Jiang, Chen B, Hou, and others to gamble in the form of \"Show Hand\" poker in that room. During this period, He and Jin lent gambling funds to the participants and took a rake-off from the gambling sessions for profit. On June 27, 2015, the public security organs apprehended Jin and others in this room, seizing gambling funds amounting to RMB 49,950 and rake-off money totaling RMB 7,300 on the spot. After investigation, it was found that defendants He and Jin profited a total rake-off of RMB 12,400 over the course of these two days. On July 9, 2015, defendant He surrendered himself to Baiyun Police Station of the Haishu Branch of the Ningbo Public Security Bureau. Based on the above facts and circumstances, the public prosecution agency recommends sentencing defendant He to eight months in prison for the crime of [x] and a fine. It also recommends sentencing defendant Jin to seven months in prison for the crime of [x] and a fine. The above facts are not disputed by defendants He and Jin during the trial, and are confirmed by the testimony of witnesses Jiang, Hou, Chen A, Yang, Chen B, Lang, Wang, and He, as well as photographic evidence, evidence preservation lists, prepaid receipts, special receipts for temporarily detained items, seizure lists, confiscation lists, inspection transcripts, public security administrative punishment decision documents, arrest course documents, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain district people's procuratorate in a certain city charged that on the morning of April 5, 2016, the defendants Zhang and He knowingly purchased 95 rolls of wire from two men (addressed in another case) at No. 74 Airport Road, Lunan Street, in a certain district of the city, despite knowing that the wire was stolen. They bought it at a price below the market rate, about 7 yuan per kilogram, and later resold these wires to the defendant Chen at 8 yuan per kilogram. Chen, knowing the wires were stolen, still purchased them. Upon investigation, it was found that these wires had been stolen from Shi, who placed them at Yindu Logistics Company on Lunan Street, around 4 a.m. on April 5, 2016. The wires were valued at 6,155 yuan according to an appraisal. On the morning of March 21, 2016, He, while at her home on No. 74 Airport Road, Lunan Street, willingly bought six boxes of brand new Shengdai batteries from a man (addressed in another case) who she knew was selling stolen goods. After consulting with her husband, Zhang, by phone, and knowing they were stolen, Zhang instructed his wife to purchase them at a price of 2 yuan per kilogram. It was later discovered that these batteries had been stolen from warehouse A01 at the Jiali Chen Logistics Center and belonged to Zheng. The batteries were valued at 3,780 yuan according to an appraisal. On April 7, 2016, He and Zhang were apprehended by the police. On April 8, 2016, Chen was also apprehended by the police. On April 26, 2016, Chen voluntarily compensated Shi with 8,000 yuan and received his forgiveness. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants He, Zhang, and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the confessions of the defendants He, Zhang, and Chen, the statement of the victim Zheng, the recognition records, search records, price appraisal reports, letter of understanding, receipt, return list, seizure decision, seizure list, case transfer list, photos, household registration materials, arrest records, explanation of circumstances, and other evidence, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On May 11, 2010, the company where the defendants Jin and Yao worked was entrusted by the Shijiazhuang Arbitration Commission to appraise the actual project cost of a completed engineering volume in a project between a certain city’s Limited Company and a provincial wind power company. During this period, the defendant Jin lost two appraisal documents and did not notify the arbitral tribunal; the defendant Yao did not examine the actual situation on-site, only reviewed the calculation data and then stamped the report to issue a formal report. This project included both civil engineering and installation parts, and neither Jin nor Yao possessed the qualifications for installation appraisal. Additionally, this appraisal report had only one cost engineer’s stamp, and the appraisal report issued by the two defendants appraised the value to be approximately more than 2.8 million yuan. Later, after a judicial appraisal carried out by a certain city’s Limited Company, the appraised price totaled RMB 4,205,729.86. Jin and Yao intentionally provided false certification documents, which affected the arbitration result, causing direct economic losses of more than one million yuan to a certain city’s company. The prosecutor presented in court the confessions of the defendants Jin and Yao, testimonies from witnesses Miao, Wang, Chang, and others, the initial report and formal report issued by a certain company, the construction contract and construction site photos provided by a certain city’s company, the decision of the Shijiazhuang Arbitration Commission, a judicial appraisal report from a certain cost company, proof of residence, and evidence of the case’s proceedings, to confirm the above.", "label": {"Jin": [], "Yao": []}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 3 a.m. on June 12, 2016, defendants Liu and An, after premeditation, used the Yidao taxi app to book a ride in a white Honda car driven by Peng2. The two boarded at the entrance of the X residential area in Wanbailin District. The vehicle proceeded to a dirt road south of Greenland Century City residential area on Jinci Road in a certain district. There, defendant An controlled Peng2 from behind while defendant Liu carried out the robbery. Liu used Peng2's WeChat to transfer 321 yuan, obtained 480 yuan in cash from the trunk of Peng2's car, forced Peng2 to reveal his bank card password and a borrowing method from Peng1, obtaining 2000 yuan and 6297 yuan, respectively, and robbed a Samsung phone (valued at 1724 yuan as appraised), and four packs of Hard Chinese cigarettes (valued at 180 yuan as appraised), totaling 11,002 yuan. It was further found that on June 16, 2016, the stolen Samsung A7 phone was returned to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and An during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the case registration form, the decision to file a case, detention certificate, arrest warrant, investigation report, scene photographs, vehicle screenshots, WeChat record screenshots, bank statement details, Alipay transfer details, photos of stolen goods, list of items seized and returned, household registration information, proof of organizational relationships; criminal judgment, release certificate, the basic situation investigation form of suspects; victim Peng2's report materials and inquiry record; identification record; price appraisal report; testimony of witness Peng1; and the confessions of defendants Liu and An, which were sufficient to be recognized.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "An": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: From early October 2013 to November 1, Yang and Xiao, the defendants, operated a gaming room on the first floor of the Haomengyuan Hotel on Jishan Street in a certain district of a certain city. They organized gambling sessions of \"Niu Niu\" multiple times involving gamblers Pan, Qian, Wang, Han, and Jiang (dealt with separately), among others. They earned profits by charging \"10 or 20 yuan per person for 'Niu Niu' or above,\" accumulating over 40,000 RMB, with each defendant obtaining over 20,000 RMB. On the afternoon of June 24, 2014, at around 1 pm, the defendant Xiao was arrested by the police at 201, Building 14, Xihu District, a certain city. On the afternoon of the 27th of the same month, around 2 pm, Yang voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the facts mentioned above. After the incident, the defendants returned the illegal proceeds. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Yang and Xiao during the court trial and were verified by witness testimonies from Pan, Qian, Wang, Han, and Zhang; a confession from Jiang, who is not an accomplice in this case; collection receipts, a confiscation inventory, the arrest details, and the confession record from Yang after he was brought to justice, as well as household registration certificates, all sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Yang": ["Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that defendant Liu conspired with defendant Wang on December 11, 2013, at around 23:00, to trespass into the underground parking lot of Hunan Compass Commercial Plaza Co., Ltd. in Juzizhou Street, Yuelu District, a certain city. By using an iron bar found on-site, defendant Liu pried open the door to the office on the first basement floor of the mall and transferred four assembled desktop computers valued at RMB 2,440 from the office to the underground parking lot. Defendant Wang waited outside and assisted defendant Liu in carrying the four stolen computers out of the mall from the underground parking lot and fled the scene. After the crime, defendant Wang was responsible for selling the stolen goods, receiving RMB 980, out of which defendant Liu was given RMB 550. On December 20, 2013, at around 21:00, defendants Liu and Wang again trespassed into Hunan Compass Commercial Plaza Co., Ltd. with the intent to commit theft and were discovered by the mall's security, who alerted the police. They were then apprehended by the responding officers. The People's Procuratorate of Yuelu District, a certain city, recommends sentencing defendants Liu and Wang to less than one year of imprisonment each, along with a fine. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wang during the trial and are supported by documentary evidence: the report by the representative of the victimized unit, Deng, the arrest documentation from the Juzizhou Police Station of the Yuelu Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, proof of identity and current behavior of defendants Liu and Wang, certification materials from Hunan Compass Commercial Plaza Co., Ltd., and explanations of the salary situation of defendants Liu and Wang, the labor contract signed between defendants Liu, Wang, and Hunan Compass Commercial Plaza Co., Ltd., testimonies from witnesses Chen, Liu A, Liu B, and Huang, statements from the unit representative victim Deng, confessions from defendants Liu and Wang, Price Appraisal Opinion No. 5 (2014) issued by the Yuelu District Price Appraisal Center of a certain city, site inspection records and photos from the public security agency, audiovisual material: on-site video of defendants Liu and Wang committing the theft and two video discs of the interrogations of defendants Wang and Liu, and other evidence sufficient to establish their guilt.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges: On March 17, 2016, at approximately 3:00 PM, the defendants Lu and Wei went to the sidewalk near the southeastern gate of Huashi on Zhongshan Avenue in the Tianhe District of this city. Wei was responsible for covering, while Lu stole a white Xiaomi 4 phone from the pocket of the victim, Fang, who was passing by (the phone was appraised to be worth 847 RMB). At around 5:00 PM on the same day, police officers on patrol found Lu and Wei behaving suspiciously. Upon interrogation, they seized the aforementioned stolen Xiaomi 4 phone from Lu and a white pair of metal tweezers used in the crime from Wei.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges: In March 2016, the defendant Wang had his driver's license revoked due to drunk driving. Later, in order to continue driving vehicles, Wang, after consulting with the defendant Zhu, decided that Zhu would approach someone to forge Wang's driver's license and resident identity card. Subsequently, defendant Zhu contacted a counterfeiter through a street advertisement and provided them with a photo of Wang, leading to the forgery of one driver's license and one resident identity card for Wang. These forged documents were then handed to defendant Wang for possession. On April 13, 2020, defendants Wang and Zhu were summoned by phone to the Xincheng Branch of the Zhoushan City Public Security Bureau for investigation. Upon arrival, they truthfully confessed to their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimony of witness Tang, a list of received evidence materials, expert opinions, criminal judgment, certificate of release, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificate, and evidence of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that, on June 23, 2016, at approximately 16:00, the defendants Ding and Chen, after conspiring beforehand, took advantage of a moment when no one was around to steal a HaoYue brand 150-9C model two-wheel motorcycle valued at 4,500 RMB with the license plate number Chuan MXXX**, which belonged to the victim Zhang, from the courtyard located at No. XX, Group XX, Village XX, Office of XX Street, Qionglai City, a province where both defendants and the victim Zhang lived together. On June 24, 2016, at around 5:00, the police captured the defendant Ding in an uninhabited empty house by the roadside of a village highway in Group X, Village XX, Shituan Town, a county in a province, and simultaneously recovered the stolen two-wheel motorcycle and returned it to the victim Zhang. After being apprehended, defendant Ding immediately confessed to his criminal acts truthfully. On June 26, 2016, at around 17:00, defendant Chen voluntarily turned himself in to the Linqiong Police Station of Qionglai City Public Security Bureau and confessed his criminal acts truthfully. The defendants raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial and pleaded guilty. Evidence such as documentary evidence including the Public Security Bureau's case registration form, the decision to open a case, the process of the defendants being brought to justice, the closing report, detailed permanent resident information of the defendants, vehicle information of license plate Chuan MXXX**, the detention decision, the return list, the notification of appraisal opinion, the victim Zhang’s statement, confessions from the defendants Ding and Chen, site identification records and photos by defendants Ding and Chen, physical evidence photos, and the appraisal opinion from Qionglai City Price Certification Center are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ding": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that between February and July 2014, the defendants Yu and Zhang (Yu's wife), despite knowing that sodium nitrate is a toxic and harmful non-food raw material, still added it during the cooking process of dog meat. They then sold the cooked dog meat at their own establishment, Jiguo Dog Meat Restaurant, located on Danlou Street, in a certain town of a certain county, for consumption. The sales amounted to over 50,000 yuan. According to the appraisal, the cooked dog meat and the substances suspected to be nitrites seized by the police at the Jiguo Dog Meat Restaurant tested positive for nitrites. Furthermore, it was found that the defendants Yu and Zhang had refunded 35,000 yuan of illegal proceeds after the case came to light. In the court hearing, the defendants Yu and Zhang raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. The facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Qi, and Yin, the quality inspection report issued by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of a certain county, the crime occurrence and investigation report produced by the Public Security Bureau of a certain county, the search records, the seizure list, on-site photos, and the household registration certificates of defendants Yu and Zhang. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on November 8, 2016, the defendants Li and Zhou drove a vehicle with the license number ChuanBXXX** from a certain city and county to Hantan Mingyuan Community in a town of a certain county. They used tools to pick the lock and sneaked into Unit 4, Building 4, Room 8 on the 5th floor, stealing cash and gold jewelry. On November 24, 2016, the defendants Li and Zhou drove the vehicle with the license number ChuanBXXX** to a town in a district of a certain city, to Yindu Baozuo Phase One. They used tools to pick the lock and entered Unit x, Building x, Room xxx, stealing a Lenovo laptop, an Apple iPad, among other items. After evaluation, the stolen computer was valued at over 1,400 yuan. On January 19, 2016, the defendants Zhou and Li (already sentenced), along with Tu (already sentenced), plotted a theft, and arrived at the Qingxiyuan Community at No. 259 Tonghua Avenue, Dawan, a district of a certain city. They used tools to pick the lock and entered Unit 4, Building 3, Room 901, stealing gold and silver jewelry before leaving. On January 19, 2016, the defendants Zhou and Li (already sentenced), and Tu (already sentenced) entered Room 1204, Unit x, Building x of Bohai Town Community at No. 28 Bohai Road in a district of a certain city, stealing a Sony camcorder and a commemorative calendar from Ping An Bank. According to price appraisals, the stolen camcorder was valued at 500 yuan. To prove the alleged facts, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, the defendants’ confessions and defenses, expert opinions, and other evidence in court.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accused: From February 14 to March 19, 2015, defendants Pan and Ding conspired to open a chess and card room at ** Building, ** Number, Wanghu Jiayuan, Anyang Street, Rui'an City, providing a venue for gambling with poker in the form known as \"Niuniu,\" and extracting a total of over 6,000 RMB in profits. On March 19 of the same year, police officers raided the chess and card room, arresting the two defendants along with Gao and 10 other gamblers. They confiscated 6,000 RMB in profits, 29,560 RMB in gambling funds, and 54 poker cards. During the court proceedings, defendants Pan and Ding did not dispute the above facts, which were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Gao, Lin, Bai, You, Miao, Xu, Shi A, Chen, He, Wu, and Shi B, as well as identification records, inspection notes, evidence preservation lists, administrative penalty decisions, house rental contracts, and population information, all sufficient to substantiate the accusations.", "label": {"Pan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On December 13, 2015, the defendants Lei and Hu agreed to steal electric bike batteries. They planned that after finding an electric bike, they would move the bike away from the scene to a secluded place to dismantle the battery and then sell it. In the early hours of December 14, 2015, the defendants Lei and Hu together went to Feishan New Town Community in a certain city. Under Unit 3 of Building 16 in Feishan New Town, they stole a black Shilong brand electric bike parked by Wu Yi. Then, the two went to Unit 3 of Building 4 in Feishan New Town and stole a red Lima brand electric bike parked by Xie. The defendants Lei and Hu pushed the stolen electric bikes to a secluded place, where Hu dismantled 18 batteries from the bikes and then discarded the vehicles. Afterwards, the two sold the 18 batteries for 700 RMB. According to an appraisal, the stolen black Shilong brand electric bike was valued at 680 RMB, and the stolen red Lima brand electric bike was valued at 1,800 RMB. On April 26, 2016, officers from the Criminal Investigation Team of Jingzhou County Public Security Bureau, to further investigate crimes, went to the first compulsory drug rehabilitation center in a certain city to interrogate drug users from Jingzhou, during which the defendants Lei and Hu voluntarily confessed to the aforementioned theft crimes. In the sentencing recommendation, the prosecution office stated that defendant Lei has the sentencing circumstances of a principal criminal, a repeat offender, and voluntary surrender, while defendant Hu has the circumstances of a principal criminal and voluntary surrender. It was suggested that defendant Lei be sentenced to between 6 and 9 months of fixed-term imprisonment and fined, and defendant Hu be sentenced to between 6 and 8 months of fixed-term imprisonment and fined. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendant Lei during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence including a report of the case registration form and acceptance registration form, arrest process, situation explanation, household registration information, criminal judgment, release certificate, the testimony of witness Wu Jia, the statements of victims Wu Yi and Xie, price certification conclusion, price appraisal opinion, on-site investigation inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, extraction records, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charged that from mid-February 2013 to March 19, 2013, defendants Fan and Ding set up two automatic mahjong tables in Affen Mahjong Parlor next to Chunxiao Garden on Yangming Street in this city. They gathered gamblers, including Zheng, Shao, Xu, Qi, Jiang, Shen, Zhang, and Jiang, to engage in a form of gambling called \"Chongji\" mahjong, from which they took commissions and profited more than 18,000 RMB. On March 19, 2013, defendants Fan and Ding were arrested by police officers. During the court hearing, defendants Fan and Ding did not object to the above facts. There is documentary evidence such as personal information records, transcripts of evidence extraction, special receipts for temporarily seized items, photo descriptions, and \"arrest procedures\"; witness testimonies from Zheng, Shao, Xu, Qi, Jiang, Shen, Zhang, and Jiang; along with inspection records, identification transcripts, and photos. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Jiangsu Province charged that defendants Lv and Tang, at around 19:00 on December 25, 2014, went to the entrance of the Fuda Doors and Windows store on Wenhua Road, Anfeng Town, a certain county, and stole a Longxin brand three-wheeled motorcycle parked by Zhang. According to a price appraisal, the vehicle was valued at 6,640 RMB. On January 12, 2015, defendant Lv voluntarily went to the Anfeng Police Station to surrender and truthfully confessed the criminal facts; after being brought to justice, defendant Tang truthfully confessed the criminal facts and compensated the victim for the vehicle loss. The defendants Lv and Tang also raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. The facts are substantiated by the price appraisal opinion and other documentary evidence, testimonies of witnesses Xu, Mu, Yang, Wu, and Hu, the statement of the victim Zhang, the confessions and defenses of defendants Lv and Tang, the on-site records, and evidence of the case occurrence, and the defendants being brought to justice, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lv": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on December 29, 2014, the defendant Lei, under the pretense of introducing a job, lured the victim, Jiang, to an illegal pyramid scheme hideout at a rented house located at No. 19, Shangcuo Road, Stone Powder Village, a certain district in a certain city, and illegally restricted Jiang's personal freedom. Later, Jiang was illegally transferred to another rented house in a village in a certain district of the same city, which was also an illegal pyramid scheme hideout. During this period, defendants Lei, Wan, and others, including Zhang and Wang (handled in a separate case), who were already part of the pyramid scheme organization, followed the arrangements of the organization's leaders, defendants Wu and Yang, to illegally restrict Jiang's personal freedom at the two hideouts for fourteen days. On January 11, 2015, Jiang managed to call the police during an outing and was rescued. It was further found that on April 6, 2015, defendant Wu was arrested in a city within a certain province by public security personnel; on April 26, 2015, defendants Yang, Lei, and Wan were arrested in a city within a certain district by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Wu, Yang, Lei, and Wan during the trial, and are supported by evidence including household registration proof, details of the arrest, prior conviction proof, the statements of Zhang and Wang (co-defendants in a separate case), the testimonies of witnesses Yan, Li Jia, Huang, Li Yi, and Ni, the statement of the victim Jiang, the identification record, and the confessions of defendants Wu, Yang, Lei, and Wan, which are sufficient to substantiate the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment"], "Lei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On a night in February 2012, defendants Wu and Di, together with Liu (handled in a separate case) and others, premeditatedly went to the construction site of buildings 21-30 in Fenghuang Huayuan, Fenghuang Town, of a certain city. Using methods such as cutting through iron sheet fences, they stole 800 iron fasteners from the site, valuing a total of 3,072 RMB. On November 20, 2012, during an investigation by the public security authorities, defendant Wu voluntarily confessed to the above-mentioned crime, which the public security authorities had not yet discovered. On March 5, 2013, defendant Di voluntarily turned himself in at the Machang Police Station of Yongcheng Public Security Bureau, Henan Province, and truthfully confessed to the above-mentioned crime. During the trial at this court, defendants Wu and Di returned 3,072 RMB, which is currently held in this court. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Wu and Di during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu and Li, price appraisal opinions, case reports, arrest processes, the defendants' confession records, household registration certificates, population information, administrative penalty decisions, social investigation opinions, special receipts for temporarily seized money, and other evidence, sufficient for confirmation and recognized by this court.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Di": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution charges: On the evening of March 10, 2014, the defendant Dai had a dispute with the victim, Zhang, over trivial matters. Subsequently, Dai gathered the defendant Hu and others at Box 12 of the Charming Seascape KTV in Zhapu Town of a certain city, where they used beer bottles, fists, and other means to assault the victim Zhang and others, resulting in multiple injuries to Zhang's head, face, and other areas. According to the evaluation, Zhang's facial injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. It was also ascertained that defendants Dai and Hu had reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim and the compensation had been fulfilled, receiving the victim's understanding. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial process, and are supported by evidence including the case registration form, on-site inspection records, victim's statement, witness testimony, identification transcripts, arrest records, forensic medical assessment of human injury degree, personal injury compensation agreement, letter of understanding, receipt, proof of inquiry into unlawful and criminal history, and identification documents, which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Dai": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On November 3, 2013, the victim, Ren, borrowed 10,000 yuan from the Shiyan Julongtai Investment Consulting Co. Ltd. On the morning of May 13, 2014, the company's manager Yu, in order to collect the debt, called Ren to come to the company for a face-to-face discussion. Around 11 a.m. that day, after Ren arrived at the company, Yu, together with the defendant Sun, used intimidation and assault to force Ren to contact others by phone to borrow money for repayment, otherwise he would not be allowed to leave. It was not until about 5 p.m. that day that Yu and Sun allowed Ren to leave the company. On December 4, 2014, defendants Yu and Sun turned themselves in at the Maojian Branch of the Shiyan Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts have been acknowledged without objection by defendants Yu, Sun, and their defense attorneys during the court proceedings, and have been corroborated by written evidence such as the IOU, a letter of understanding, and household registration information; the testimonies of witnesses Xiao, Zhu, and others; the victim Ren's statement; and identification records and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention"], "Sun": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: At around 20:00 on September 5, 2015, the victim Gan was driving a truck and passed through the Gongbei Ridge exit/entry point in the Xiangzhou District of Zhuhai City. He did not return the key for the iron post at the Ridge exit/entry point to the security office, causing a road blockage. When the victim Gan tried to pass through the exit/entry point again, the security guards, defendants Guan, Wang, and Lin, stopped him, leading to an argument between the parties and then a physical altercation. As a result, the victim Gan suffered fractures to his left zygomatic and zygomatic process of the temporal bone, while the defendant Guan sustained contusions and lacerations on his scalp. According to the assessment, the injuries to the victim Gan were classified as minor injuries of level two, and the injuries to the defendant Guan as slight injuries. On September 6, 2015, defendants Lin, Wang, and Guan were apprehended and brought to justice. It was also found that after the incident, Shenzhen Jinyangcheng Property Management Co., Ltd., the unit where defendants Guan, Wang, and Lin were employed, compensated the victim Gan RMB 30,000 for economic losses on behalf of the defendants. The victim Gan expressed forgiveness towards the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Guan, Wang, and Lin during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements and identification records of victim Gan, the testimony and identification records of witness Peng, the testimony of witness Xu, the apprehension process, forensic assessment of bodily injury, preliminary forensic injury assessment opinion form, letter of forgiveness, receipt, seizure decision, seizure record, seizure list, explanation of circumstances, household registration information certificate, no criminal record certificate, site monitoring screenshots, monitoring video explanation, and site photographs, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that on January 7, 2013, at approximately 2:00 PM, the defendant Zhu was driving a gray Chevrolet sedan with the license plate LuR×××××, near the south side of the Customs intersection on Renmin Road in Heze City. An altercation occurred with the victim Pang, who was delivering express packages on a motor tricycle, due to a roadway dispute. The victim Pang followed the vehicle to near the entrance of the Danyang Office on Zhonghua Road, where an argument with the defendant Zhu ensued. The defendant Zhu, along with the defendant Chen who was a passenger in his vehicle, assaulted the victim Pang, causing injuries. According to the assessment, the injuries were classified as minor. Furthermore, it was found that on May 8, 2013, the families of defendants Chen and Zhu reached a compensation agreement with the victim Pang. The families of the defendants compensated the victim for medical expenses, totaling 65,000 yuan, which has already been paid in full. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhu during the trial. The case is supported by the victim Pang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Cao, Zhu, Yang, and others, the forensic assessment of bodily injury severity from Heze City Public Security Bureau Development Zone Branch (He) Public (Development) Assessment (Forensic) Document No. (2013) 010, injury photographs, basic resident information, arrest process details, the agreement and receipt, and confessions from defendants Chen and Zhu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "In the trial, it was found that at around 8:00 on July 14, 2019, the defendants Sun and Li stole an Apple X phone that the victim Lu had left charging on the computer desk at Free Base Internet Cafe in Xinghua City. Later, defendant Sun hid the phone in a wastepaper box outside the restroom of the Internet cafe. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 5,680 RMB. Following the crime, defendants Sun and Li confessed to the criminal acts truthfully, and the stolen phone was seized and returned to the victim. Currently, defendants Sun and Li are willing to use the bail bond paid to the Public Security Bureau of Xinghua City to offset the fine. The above-mentioned facts were undisputed by defendants Sun and Li during the trial, and they voluntarily signed a written confession and plea agreement. In addition, there is the statement from the victim Lu; testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang and Feng; documentary evidence, including basic population information, arrest situation statement, copy of the administrative punishment decision produced or extracted by the Public Security Bureau of Xinghua City; photographic evidence produced by the Public Security Bureau of Xinghua City; price certification conclusion issued by Xinghua City Price Certification Center; on-site inspection records, site maps, and site photographs produced by the Public Security Bureau of Xinghua City; and surveillance video retrieved from the Internet cafe, all of which have been confirmed and are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. Starting in June 2015, the defendant Gu, at his store \"Qiangzai\" located at 803 Hefulu, Hecheng Street, Gaoming District of a certain city, accepted underground Mark Six lottery bets from walk-in customers and then handed them over to his superiors, Lu and Chen (both are being dealt with in separate cases), who placed the bets on gambling websites. After the results were announced, Gu would settle accounts with his superiors through cash transactions and WeChat transfers, earning a commission as a middleman. Up until his arrest, Gu placed bets totaling 140,000 RMB with Lu and 80,000 RMB with Chen, cumulatively accepting bets of 220,000 RMB. 2. Starting in August 2014, the defendant Yu accepted underground Mark Six lottery bets from his subordinate Xu (dealt with in a separate case) and then passed the betting slips to his superior \"Uncle Bao\" (dealt with in a separate case) to place bets on gambling websites. After the draw, Yu and Xu earned commissions as middlemen. When the bets Xu accepted were insufficient to pay out the winning prizes to his betting customers, Yu would collect money from his superior and transfer it to Xu for the payouts. After deducting the winning prizes and Xu's commission, Xu would transfer the remaining amount to Yu. Up until his arrest, Yu accumulated bets from Xu totaling 125,000 RMB. The above facts are substantiated by the prosecution's submitted and courtroom-certified confessions and defenses of the defendants Gu and Yu, as well as the identification records, and the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Xu, Chen, Wang, and Lu. Additional evidence includes the gathered evidence list, account information, bank transaction records, WeChat transfer records, the settlement of gambling funds between Gu and his superior Chen, Chen's WeChat transaction records as the sender, Gu's personal client contract information, the detailed statement of a passbook from the Agricultural Bank of China, account details, household registration certificate, proof of residence, basic information of permanent residents, arrest record, on-site inspection report, fugitive registration, criminal background check, explanatory notes, etc. All of these are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city accused: At around 22:10 on May 18, 2015, at a certain street food stall in a certain district of a certain city, defendants Hou, Jia, Meng, Zhou A and Zhou B (the latter two handled in a separate case) and others had a verbal altercation with the victim Zhou C over trivial matters, after which defendants Hou, Jia, Meng, and others injured the victim Zhou C. Upon assessment, the victim Zhou C’s injuries were determined to be of a minor degree at level two. On June 2, 2015, the parties reached a reconciliation. The court found: The criminal facts charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city were true. It was also found that the case was reported by another person, which led to the discovery of the crime. Defendant Hou was apprehended by the public security organ, while defendants Jia and Meng voluntarily turned themselves into the public security organ. After arriving, defendants Hou, Jia, and Meng truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. After the incident, defendants Hou, Jia, Meng, and the relatives of the co-defendants reached an agreement with the victim Zhou C, compensating him a total of 100,000 yuan for various losses. The victim Zhou C forgave defendants Hou, Jia, and Meng, suggesting that no criminal responsibility should be pursued against the three defendants. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Hou, Jia, and Meng during the court hearing, and are substantiated by documentary evidence, assessment opinions, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, and the defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 3:00 PM on December 17, 2014, Cai (self-reported) contacted defendant Li via mobile phone regarding the purchase of drugs, and transferred 300 yuan to Li's bank account as per Li's instructions. Subsequently, defendant Li instructed defendant Tan to place a packet of drugs under the stairs of the alley opposite No. 69, Guangchang Middle Road, Tangxia Town, in a certain city of a certain province. Defendant Li then informed Cai of the location via text message. Defendant Tan was later apprehended by public security personnel near the mentioned location, and the drugs in question, along with two additional packets of drugs on his person, were seized. According to the assessment, the packet of drugs intended for the transaction weighed 1.05 grams, and the two seized packets weighed a total of 1.02 grams (after the material was used for testing), both containing methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Li and Tan during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Cai, the seizure list, the physical and chemical examination report, text message photos, the China Industrial and Commercial Bank’s detailed account statement, the administrative penalty decision letter, the community drug rehabilitation order, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, explanatory notes, the arrest account, and population information, providing sufficient evidence for confirmation.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 11 a.m. on December 11, 2013, defendant Luo had a dispute with the victim Zhang at a motorcycle repair shop located at No. 53 Anlian Road, Xiangzhou District, in our city, over the payment for repair fees. Luo then notified defendant Fan to come to the scene. Together, they knocked the victim Zhang to the ground, causing an injury to Zhang's waist (the injury was assessed as minor). The following day, defendants Luo and Fan turned themselves in at the Mingzhu Police Station of the Public Security Bureau in our city. Subsequently, defendants Luo and Fan compensated the victim Zhang for the economic losses and received Zhang's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by defendants Luo and Fan during the trial, with no objections raised, and were corroborated by the victim Zhang's statement, witness Zhou's testimony, the assessment conclusion, on-site photographs, the mediation agreement, receipts, the account of apprehension, and household registration proof, all sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: On April 26, 2015, at around 21:00, the defendant Tian went to the Training Motel in Langxia, Yangjian Town, Xishan District, Wuxi City. Due to a dispute over checkout fees with the motel owner Wang, the police were called. After the police arrived at the scene, they coordinated and resolved the issue. Subsequently, the defendants Tian, Shu, and Xu returned to the first-floor bar of the Training Motel. Defendant Tian picked up a thermos flask from the bar and smashed it at Wang. The three defendants punched and kicked both Wang and his mother Liao, injuring them. According to the forensic identification by the Wuxi Public Security Bureau, the injuries sustained by Wang and Liao were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Tian, Shu, and Xu voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed to their acts of provocation and causing trouble. After the case was solved, the defendants Tian, Shu, and Xu compensated the victims with 80,000 yuan and obtained their understanding. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Tian, Shu, and Xu during the trial, and are corroborated by the prosecution's evidence, including the \"Criminal Case Investigation Process\" and \"Explanation of Circumstances\" issued by the public security organ, criminal photographs, statements from the victims Wang and Liao, outpatient medical records, hospitalization records, identification records, agreements and letters of understanding, the \"Forensic Medical Assessment of Human Injury Degree\" issued by the Wuxi Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identification Institute, as well as the confessions and identification records of the defendants Tian, Shu, and Xu, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Shu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Baoshan District in a certain city charges: Defendant Di, because Wang had been pestering Jia in a WeChat group, wanted to stand up for Jia. On June 10, 2016, Di agreed with Wang via WeChat, phone calls, and other means that they would each gather people to engage in a fight at 21:30 on June 12, 2016, in front of Phoebe Bar, located at XXX, Shuichan West Road, Baoshan District, in a certain city. Afterwards, defendant Di gathered others by posting about the fight in a social media circle, chatting on WeChat, and making phone calls, and prepared fighting tools. During this time, after defendant Guo learned about the plan, he volunteered to bring a knife and participate in the fight. At around 21:30 on June 12, 2016, defendants Di, Guo, and Shen (handled in a separate case) and more than thirty others arrived successively at the front of Phoebe Bar at XXX, Shuichan West Road, Baoshan District, in a certain city in preparation for the fight, but since no one from Wang's side showed up, the plan was foiled. At around 22:00 on the same day, the police arrested defendants Di, Guo, and others at the location, seizing knives, sticks, and other instruments. After being brought to justice, defendants Di and Guo confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts truthfully. During the court hearing, defendants Di and Guo also raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which were sufficiently proven by the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Shen, H", "label": {"Di": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Taizhou charged: At around 22:00 on March 28, 2013, Xia (already sentenced), under the guise of car repair, entered Taizhou Triumph Automobile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Triumph Company), loaded six motorcycles that were temporarily impounded by the traffic police department from Triumph Company's parking lot into a truck, and stole them. He then transported them to the vicinity of the motorcycle repair shop operated by Zhao on Huanxi Road, Diao Pu Street, in a certain district. The next morning, defendant Zhao, knowing full well that the aforementioned vehicles did not have legal and valid documentation, still contacted defendant Liu to sell the batch of vehicles. Defendant Liu, also knowing that the vehicles lacked legal and valid documentation, purchased five of the motorcycles for 1,700 RMB. According to the appraisal, the total value of these five motorcycles amounted to 10,344 RMB. After the crime was discovered, defendants Zhao and Liu truthfully confessed their crimes. The public security organs lawfully seized all the stolen goods and have returned them. During the litigation, defendant Zhao prepaid a property penalty deposit of 1,000 RMB, and defendant Liu prepaid a property penalty deposit of 5,000 RMB. These facts were not contested by defendants Zhao and Liu during the trial. They are supported by evidence such as the photographs of the motorcycles taken by the public security organs, documentary evidence like the criminal judgment issued by this court, witness testimonies from individuals such as Ma, and the valuation conclusion report issued by the Price Certification Center of a certain district in Taizhou, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xiangshan District in a certain city charged that on October 31, 2015, at around 17:00, the defendants Zhang and Huang, after premeditation, each carried a utility knife and a blade onto a coach traveling from a certain county to a certain place. Taking advantage of the victim Tang’s unguarded state while he was asleep, defendant Huang acted as a lookout while defendant Zhang used a blade to cut open the victim's clothes, stealing a BBK VIVO phone, model X5M, from the left inner pocket of the victim's jacket and cash amounting to 200 yuan. After committing the crime, the two defendants sold the stolen phone for 800 yuan, of which defendant Huang received 230 yuan and the remainder was taken by defendant Zhang. After the case was solved, the public security authorities recovered 600 yuan of the stolen money, which was returned to the victim Tang. They also confiscated two utility knives and five blades from room 106 of a hostel rented by the defendants. According to an appraisal by the price certification center of a certain city, the stolen phone was valued at 1,654 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Huang during the trial. Moreover, these facts are substantiated by the victim's report and statements; receipt of phone purchase; site and stolen goods photos; identification records and photos; site layout diagram; arrest details; explanatory notes; previous conviction judgment; pricing appraisal conclusion from the price certification center of a certain city; list of seized and returned items; confessions of defendants Zhang and Huang, and their household registration certificates, which are sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: One night in mid-May 2014, the defendants Bian and Jiang, together with the suspect Wang (born on September 16, 1996, to be handled in a separate case), entered a certain restaurant in a town in a district of a city by sneaking through the door. They stole 300 yuan in cash, 2 packs of \"Hard Zhonghua\" cigarettes, 9 bottles of \"Yanghe Blue Classic Tianzhilan\" liquor, and 13 bottles of \"Yanghe Blue Classic Haizhilan\" liquor, with a total value of 4,650 yuan. On June 30, 2015, the defendants Bian and Jiang were arrested by public security organs. After being brought to justice, they both truthfully confessed to the theft. After being captured, defendant Bian assisted the public security organs in capturing other suspects. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Bian and Jiang compensated the victim Pan with 2,000 yuan each on behalf of the two defendants (the remaining amount was paid by the suspect Wang), and Pan forgave the actions of the two defendants. The defendants Bian and Jiang also had no objection to the above facts during the court trial, and there is sufficient evidence to substantiate these facts, including their confession records along with that of suspect Wang, the victim Pan's statement record, the testimony record of witness Zhang, the case registration form, the incident details, the capture details, the explanatory memo, the identification record, the price appraisal report, the criminal judgment, the notification of release from community correction, the receipt, the letter of understanding, and the household registration information.", "label": {"Bian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that on October 17, 2014, at about 9 a.m., during the Jing-Shi Reconstruction and Expansion JS6 project, the project contractor Ma failed to verify the professional qualifications of the crane operator he employed. He hired Qin, who did not possess a special equipment operator's license, to carry out crane operations at a construction site on a section of road in a certain village, town, district, and city. During operations, Qin violated operational procedures, causing the crane to overturn, which resulted in the immediate death of the worker, Qin. It was also found that after the incident, both defendants compensated the victim's family a total economic loss of 1,100,000. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and they were substantiated by the case investigation, testimonies from witnesses Luo, Ding, Fang, and Tao, the site inspection records and photographs, the forensic autopsy report and photographs, a photocopy of the defendant Qin's driver's license, the power of attorney, the compensation mediation agreement, the letter of commitment, and receipts, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in the early morning of October 26, 2013, defendants Liu and Cui conspired to commit a theft. The two then went to Building 2, Unit 2 of the Ruby Mansion on Hushan Street, Wuyi County, where Liu acted as a lookout downstairs while Cui climbed up from the first floor with his bare hands to carry out the theft. Defendant Cui climbed to the living room window of Room 401, used scissors and pliers prepared in advance to cut open the burglar window bars, and entered the room to steal a gold necklace. Cui then climbed to the living room window of Room 601, placed the gold necklace inside a shoe he was wearing, placed the shoe, scissors, and pliers on the air conditioning unit, and using the same method, entered Room 601 to steal 9,020 yuan in cash and an iPhone 5S. When Cui was about to open the door to leave, the victim, Chen, was alarmed. Defendant Cui didn't have time to take the shoe, scissors, and pliers on the air conditioning unit and escaped through the door, fleeing the scene with Liu downstairs. According to the appraisal, the stolen gold necklace was valued at 4,433 yuan, and the iPhone 5S at 5,178 yuan. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Liu and Cui during the trial, and they willingly pleaded guilty. These facts are corroborated by documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, lists of seized items, and acceptance receipts; the statements of victims Chen and Zhang; the price appraisal report and the precious metal jewelry inspection certificate from the Jinhua Quality and Technical Supervision and Testing Institute; site investigation records, recognition records, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that in September 2012, the defendant Xue, in collusion with the defendant Zhang, felled 58 poplar trees located on both sides of a mechanical farming road north of a certain village, in a certain town, without obtaining a timber harvesting permit. According to an appraisal by the Forestry Bureau of Yutian County, the volume of the 58 felled poplar trees was 26.8214 cubic meters. The evidence provided by the public prosecution includes: 1) the confessions and defenses of the defendants Xue and Zhang; 2) witness testimonies; 3) documentary evidence; and 4) expert opinions, among others.", "label": {"Xue": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the afternoon of early September 2015, the defendants Liao and Liu allowed Wu Yi and Wu Jia to consume heroin, and Su injected heroin in a rented room on the first floor at No. 116 Zhongjie, Fuqiang Village, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City. On the evening of the 7th of the same month, the two defendants again allowed Wu Yi to use heroin in the aforementioned rented room. One night at the end of August 2015, defendant Liao allowed Wu Yi to consume heroin and Su to inject heroin in the same rented room. On the night of September 10th of the same year, Liao allowed Chen, Wu Jia to consume heroin, and Su to inject heroin. Around 11 PM on September 11, 2015, defendants Liao and Liu were captured at the rented premises by officers from the Jiaojiang Branch of Taizhou Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liao and Liu during the trial, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Wu Jia, Su, Wu Yi, and Pan, as well as on-site inspection reports, identification records, arrest documentation, household registration certificates, administrative penalty decision documents, and explanatory notes, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on July 14, 2011, at around 4 PM, in the vicinity of the north river embankment of a certain village, Chang (already sentenced), a resident of a certain village in a certain county, drove past and, dissatisfied with Chen's vehicle blocking the way, punched Chen in the eye. After learning that his father-in-law Chen was injured, Song B, a resident of a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, rushed to the scene with Bai and others, intending to take Chen to the hospital. On their way from the scene, they were stopped by Chang, along with the defendants Guo, Lin, and others. The defendants Guo and Lin, in collaboration with Chang and others, assaulted Song B, Chen, Bai, Zhuang, and others, and damaged Song B's Apple iPhone. An appraisal determined that Song B, Chen, Bai, and Zhuang sustained minor injuries, and the value of the damaged Apple iPhone was 680 yuan. On February 4, 2013, and January 23, 2014, defendants Guo and Lin voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security bureau of a certain county and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. In support of the charges, the prosecution provided evidence including the confessions and defenses of the defendants, the statements of the victims, the testimony of witnesses, expert opinions, and documentary evidence.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province charges: A certain corporation incorporated in a certain country holds the registered trademarks No. 137XXX, 137XXX, 244XXX, and 244XXX \"Certain\" for use on goods in Classes 7, 17, 8, and 9, which include incubators, machine parts, oil seals for rolling mills, air reservoirs for heavy industrial machinery, valves, and other machinery, parts, and components for geological exploration, mining, metallurgy, petroleum, and heavy industry not classified elsewhere. The validity periods are from May 15, 1980, to May 14, 2020, and from February 28, 1986, to February 27, 2016. Starting in the second half of 2015, defendants Liu and Wu, without obtaining a business license, sold illegally manufactured packaging materials such as certain cardboard boxes and plastic bags from a warehouse on the first floor at No. X, Lane X, Road X, District X, in this city. On February 29, 2016, police officers from a local police station in Guangzhou conducted an inspection of the warehouse, caught Liu and Wu on the spot, and seized 37,400 counterfeit folding cardboard boxes, 116,200 counterfeit plastic bags, 588 counterfeit finished packaging boxes, and 6,000 counterfeit white labels (upon identification, these products were all found to be counterfeit products of the \"Certain\" registered trademark of a certain corporation).", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City charged that on March 25, 2014, at about 8:00 p.m., the defendants Liang and Zhong, after premeditation, waited near a restaurant on Xinshi Road in a district of this city. Zhong selected a driver named Duan, who was driving a car with license plate A××××× after drinking. Liang followed in a car with license plate B××××× and intentionally collided with the rear of the car driven by Duan. Liang and Zhong, taking advantage of Duan's reluctance to report the incident due to drinking, forcibly extorted 5,000 yuan (hereinafter referred to as RMB) from him. On March 26 of the same year, at about 9:00 p.m., the defendants Liang and Zhong, after premeditation, waited near the \"Hao Shizhai\" restaurant on Longgang Road in a district of this city. Zhong selected a driver named Mao Mosheng, who was driving a car with license plate A××××× after drinking. Liang followed in a car with license plate B××××× and intentionally collided with the rear of the car driven by Mao Mosheng when the two cars reached the Changhong Village section of a district. Liang and Zhong attempted to take advantage of Mao Mosheng's reluctance to report the incident due to drinking to extort 12,000 yuan from Mao. However, the traffic police arrived promptly, and they did not succeed. Based on the above facts,", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On October 8, 2004, the defendant Zhu registered marriage with Li at the Lixin County Civil Affairs Bureau. After 2012, Zhu, without divorcing his wife Li, lived together with Yao in a certain district of a city under the guise of a married couple, and they gave birth to a son in April 2013. After 2014, the defendant Yao, knowing that Zhu had a spouse whom he had not divorced, continued to live with him. The public prosecution authority provided relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the confessions of the defendants to the court, believing that the actions of the defendants Zhu and Yao violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and requested the court to convict and sentence the defendants Zhu and Yao for the crime of x. The defendants Zhu and Yao had no objection to the facts and charges presented by the prosecution. Upon examination, it was found: On October 8, 2004, the defendant Zhu registered marriage with Li at the Lixin County Civil Affairs Bureau. After 2012, Zhu, without divorcing his wife Li, lived together with Yao as a couple in a certain district of a city, and they gave birth to a son in April 2013. After 2014, the defendant Yao, knowing that Zhu had a spouse whom he had not divorced, continued to live with him. After the case came to light, the defendant Zhu had divorced Li and obtained Li's forgiveness. It was also found that after the case came to light, the defendant Yao voluntarily went to the Lixin County Public Security Bureau to surrender on January 14, 2015, and truthfully confessed her criminal facts. These facts are confirmed by documentary evidence such as the case registration form, household registration certificate, marriage certificate, divorce agreement, divorce certificate, letter of forgiveness, receipt, arrest process, testimonies of witnesses like Wang and Li, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhu and Yao, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District in a certain city charged that in the early hours of April 6, 2015, the defendants Huang and Liu, after prior discussion, went to Jinghai Community in the Binhai Industrial Zone of a certain city’s Keqiao District and stole a Harley-Davidson motorcycle parked under Building 3 by Cai. According to the appraisal, the stolen Harley-Davidson motorcycle was valued at 4,050 yuan. After the incident, the stolen Harley-Davidson motorcycle was recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang and Liu during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence including photos of the motorcycle, photos of screwdrivers, motor vehicle registration certificates, situation explanations, the capture process, Cai's statement, extraction records, identification records of defendants Huang and Liu, and the price appraisal conclusion document, which are sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At approximately 2:30 a.m. on June 21, 2016, defendants Wang and Yue sold 0.6 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Li for 400 RMB at the He Yuan Community, a certain area in Qian County. On the same day, defendants Wang and Yue were apprehended by the public security authorities. The prosecution provided and presented in court the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Yue; the testimony of witness Li; expert opinions; physical evidence and other documentary evidence to support the aforementioned facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jianggan District, a certain city in Zhejiang Province, charged that shareholders Chen, Shi, and Zheng (all dealt with separately) of a local investment management company discussed in December 2010 how to solve their operational funding issues by issuing shares in the name of the already deregistered \"National Group Co., Ltd.\" to raise funds. They specifically entrusted Xu, Zheng, and others to resell the shares and agreed to split the raised funds in a 3:7 ratio. By the time the case was uncovered in June 2011, Chen, Shi, and Zheng had obtained a total of over RMB 16 million from Xu, Zheng, and others. Xu and Zheng each earned a commission of RMB 80,000. Xu was prepared to surrender but was apprehended by the police on September 24, 2012, while Zheng voluntarily turned himself in on November 15, 2012. To substantiate these facts, the prosecution read and presented the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and the defendants' confessions in court.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that since February 2012, defendants Ren and Liu placed one gambling fish machine, three rotating light machines, and one Plants vs. Zombies machine in the Haosen Silver Seat Billiards Leisure Club they operated for profit. The two defendants did not dispute these facts during the court hearing. Additionally, the confiscated items, photos of the gambling machines, and witness testimony from Li serve as evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Ren": [], "Liu": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges that on the afternoon of April 11, 2018, defendants Jiang and Feng, along with three others, went to the town of Ziyuan County to discuss with Mo a debt owed by Mo to Jiang. In Mo's office, Jiang's friend \"A\" (specific identity unknown) argued with Mo over the issue of repayment. \"A\" threatened Mo, stating that if Mo did not give Jiang a response, they would take Mo to a certain location. Later, under the persuasion of Mo's friend, both parties were separated. Subsequently, Mo took Jiang and his group to a mine he had contracted three kilometers away for inspection and had a meal at the mandarin orange field restaurant. After the meal, Jiang forcibly took Mo into the car under the pretense of going to a certain local county Lehuantian KTV to sing. In the car, Jiang made a phone call, and Mo, thinking Jiang was calling a shareholder surnamed Tang, attempted to grab the phone to speak with the person on the line, which led to Jiang slapping Mo twice. After being hit, Mo struggled to get out of the car. The driver Jiang stopped in front of a postal convenience store in a certain village group of a town, where Mo rushed into the store to seek help from the lady owner, Wang. However, Jiang and the others pursued him and took his phone away. Subsequently, Jiang and his group forcibly dragged Mo back to the car and tried to coerce him into getting in, but Mo refused. Thus, Jiang and his group beat Mo, during which a man ran over and threat", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Feng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. Around 11 PM on September 22, 2014, the defendants Xiang, Ou, and Fu, together with Wang, Yu B, Yu A, and Wei (all of whom are being dealt with in separate cases), conspired in advance and, armed with batons, went to the pedestrian section of the road from the traffic light of Heng An Group in Anhai Town, Jinjiang City, towards \"Golden Years.\" They used assault tactics to rob the victim Ren of a white Samsung mobile phone and the victim Peng of an OPPO mobile phone (both unable to be appraised). 2. Around 11 PM on September 26, 2014, the defendant Xiang, together with Wei, Xiang A (handled in a separate case), and Yu C (handled in another case), conspired in advance and went to the section of the road near the \"Yake\" factory gate on Quanan Road, Luoshan Street, Jinjiang City. They used assault tactics to rob the victim Qiu Fang of a white Apple iPhone 4 (unable to be appraised). The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Xiang, Ou, and Fu during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Ren and Qiu Fang, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Yu B, Yu A, Xiang A, and Wei, identification records and photos, identification explanations, household registration documents, and reports and work descriptions from the public security organs, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that the defendants Fan and Shen, on March 2, 2017, at around 20:00, while dining at the Zanhua Japanese Restaurant located at XXX Floor, XXX No. Sichuan North Road in this city, after drinking alcohol, attempted to invite a neighboring table guest, Feng, for a drink but failed. Subsequently, an altercation occurred with Liu, who was accompanied by Feng. The defendants Fan and Shen then assaulted the victim Liu, during which Feng was injured while trying to intervene. After the incident, according to the judicial appraisal by Shanghai Kejian Investment Management Co., Ltd., Liu suffered a cranio-cerebral injury and soft tissue contusion and laceration on the face due to external force by others, constituting minor injuries; Feng sustained multiple soft tissue contusions on the face and body due to external force by others, also constituting minor injuries. On March 3, 2017, the defendants Fan and Shen voluntarily went to the public security organs for investigation after receiving a phone call from the police, but they did not truthfully confess their crimes. During the trial in this court, with the assistance of their families, the defendants Fan and Shen voluntarily compensated the victims Liu and Feng with 20,000 RMB and received the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Fan and Shen and their respective defenders during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Liu and Feng, testimonies from witnesses Zhang and Yan, the \"Injury Examination Notification,\" \"Work Report,\" \"Incident Process\" issued by the Hongkou Branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, and the \"Judicial Appraisal Opinion\" issued by Shanghai Kejian Investment Management Co., Ltd., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Detention"], "Shen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: From the end of 2015 to July 30, 2016, the defendant Li placed a gambling machine in Chai's small shop for others to gamble, from which the defendants Li and Chai profited more than 6,200 yuan.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the evening of January 10, 2014, the defendants Xu, Wu, Qian, Cheng, and Hu were having a meal at a street stall in the city. Xu received a call from Zhou A, saying that she did not want to interact with her boyfriend Hu A, and asked Xu to pick her up. Xu claimed that his girlfriend Zhou A was being bullied and invited the defendants Wu, Qian, Cheng, and Hu to teach Hu A a lesson. Wu and the others agreed. After the meal, the five of them took machetes and daggers to Huayuan KTV in the city. On the way, defendant Xu called Zhou A to ask about Hu A's appearance. At the entrance of Huayuan KTV, the defendants mistakenly thought the victim Zhou was Hu A. Cheng first rushed up, putting his arm around Zhou's neck and throwing her to the ground. Xu, Wu, Qian, and Hu then rushed forward, hacking at Zhou's body with knives and kicking her, causing multiple injuries. According to the Tongling City Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, the victim Zhou suffered a fracture of the left acromion and damage to the left area, with the injury assessed as a first-degree minor injury and rated as an eighth-grade disability by Anhui Lantian Judicial Appraisal Institute. On May 24, 2015, after a phone notification from the Public Security Bureau of Wenling City, Zhejiang, defendant Hu turned himself in. During the trial, defendant Xu compensated the victim Zhou with 10,000 yuan for economic losses, defendant Wu compensated 40,000 yuan, defendant Cheng compensated 60,000 yuan, defendant Qian compensated 10,000 yuan, defendant Cheng (again) compensated 60,000 yuan, and defendant Hu compensated 10,000 yuan. The victim Zhou expressed understanding towards each defendant. (The civil part of this case has been mediated and resolved.)", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Qian": ["Imprisonment"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charges: From 2014 until the case was discovered, the defendants Wang and Zhang, a married couple, operated the \"Zhengbang Snack Shop\" at the east gate of Tongda Market in the Shihe Town of this district. During the production of buns, the defendants Wang and Zhang violated national regulations by adding aluminum-containing baking powder and selling the buns to the public. On the morning of March 17, 2016, the local public security authorities conducted an inspection of the \"Zhengbang Snack Shop,\" seizing 47 bags of aluminum-containing baking powder and obtaining samples of the buns for inspection. Laboratory tests conducted by the Comprehensive Technical Service Center of the Huai'an Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau revealed that the aluminum content in the submitted buns was 354mg/kg. Furthermore, it was found that after the case was discovered, the defendants Wang and Zhang truthfully confessed to the above facts during interrogation. The defendants Wang and Zhang did not object to the above facts during the court trial, and their confessions after being brought to justice, the testimonies of witnesses Wang and Dai, and various evidence, including the case registration form, seizure decision, seizure list, inspection records, and on-site photos produced by the public security authority, the investigation process provided by the public security authority, the explanatory document regarding the resolution of the case, the inspection report issued by the Comprehensive Technical Service Center of the Huai'an Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, and the announcement by five departments including the National Health and Family Planning Commission on the adjustment of the regulations on the use of aluminum-containing food additives, all provide sufficient evidence for determination. During the trial, the prosecution suggested that the defendants Wang and Zhang be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from six months to one year and six months, along with a fine, and that probation could be applied.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on May 14, 2015, the defendants Chen, Rao, and Wang were staying at the \"Seven Days\" Hotel at Guanshankou, Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan City. Due to a trivial matter, they had a dispute with a hotel staff member named Ma. During the altercation, the defendants Chen, Rao, and Wang injured Ma and a hotel security guard named Tian. According to forensic assessment: Ma's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while Tian's injuries were classified as slight injuries. The defendants Chen, Rao, and Wang were summoned to the scene by the public security authorities, and the victims Ma and Tian have received civil compensation.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Rao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that the defendant Li, in order to support his drug use through trafficking, sold a total of 1.2 grams of methamphetamine on four occasions between September and October 2013 at locations such as the entrance of Baifuqing KTV and Xingyun Garden residential area in the county town. He obtained illegal proceeds totaling 2,000 RMB. On one day at the end of September 2013, he, along with defendant Wang, who provided the funds, went to a town in a certain county in a certain city to purchase methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\"). These facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, identification records, and the physical evidence examination report from the Huludao City Public Security Bureau Forensic Institute, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been established that around 00:00 on September 29, 2013, defendants Cai and Zhang were passing through the opening of Waixiaochang Lane on Kaiyuan Road in Siming District, a certain city, when they saw victim Chen Moujia urinating in the corner, which led to a verbal altercation. Subsequently, defendants Cai and Zhang and victims Chen Moujia and Chen Mou began physically fighting in the alley, resulting in victim Chen Moujia being injured and falling to the ground. It was assessed that victim Chen Moujia suffered an intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, classified as a minor injury of the second degree, while victim Chen Mou had swelling of the soft tissue on the left cheek, classified as a slight injury. After the incident, defendants Cai and Zhang were apprehended on the spot by public security personnel. Upon arrival in custody, defendants Cai and Zhang truthfully confessed to the above facts and actively compensated victim Chen Moujia for economic losses amounting to a total of 200,000 yuan. Both victims Chen Moujia and Chen Mou expressed their understanding of the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cai and Zhang during the trial process. Evidence includes the statements of victims Chen Moujia and Chen Mou, testimonies of witnesses Xia and Hu, injury photographs, forensic clinical test appraisal reports and notices from the Siming Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, relevant recognition records and photographs, application and agreement for reconciliation in a minor injury case, a report on the implementation of the reconciliation agreement, a criminal understanding letter, receipt, the pre-trial confessions and defenses of the two defendants, an investigation and assessment opinion letter issued by the Siming District Judicial Bureau of the city, and attendance process documents, household registration certificates of the two defendants, and documents related to legal enforcement measures issued by public security authorities, all sufficiently corroborate the determination.", "label": {"Cai": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: From May 15 to June 15, 2015, the defendant Wang, in collusion with the defendants Ge, Liu, and Yin, Xu, Zhang (all handled in separate cases), utilized the positions of the defendants Liu, Yin, Zhang, Xu, and others as material handlers and movers in the A32SMT department of the victim unit XXXX Industrial (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. Taking advantage of this, they repeatedly stole computer motherboards from the victim unit. These individuals handed the motherboards over to the defendants Wang, Ge, or Yin, who took them to the rooftop of the victim unit. They then evaded security checks by placing the motherboards into backpacks and lowering them off the building. By doing so multiple times, they stole various models of notebook computer motherboards produced by the company, with a total value exceeding 700,000 RMB. Among these, 259 notebook computer motherboards were left on the rooftop, valued at over 320,000 RMB. After Wang was apprehended, he truthfully confessed the criminal facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: At around 23:00 on May 6, 2016, defendants Tan and Nong went to the side of Alin Barber Shop near Yelin Hotel in Taoyuan Town, a certain city. Nong was responsible for keeping watch, while Tan pried the lock and stole a white Guihuo brand motorized scooter belonging to the victim, Cui, which was parked there (appraised value: 3,590 RMB). After succeeding, the two parked the scooter in a parking lot opposite Longquan Footbath on Wenming Road, Shaping Street, the same city. At around 5:00 on the 8th of the same month, the two retrieved the scooter from the parking lot. On their way to a town in the Nanhai District, the same city, they were apprehended by the police. The stolen motorized scooter has been returned to the victim, Cui.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Nong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in July 2014, defendants Cheng and Liu were long-term residents at a certain chain hotel in a town of a certain district of a certain city. In the early morning of July 21, defendants Cheng and Liu allowed Li, Qian, and others to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in room 406 of the hotel. Subsequently, the two relocated to room 309 of the same hotel and again allowed Li to use methamphetamine that night. In the early morning of July 22, the defendants continued to allow Li, Zhu, another Zhu, and another friend of Li (whose identity is unknown) to use methamphetamine in room 309. On July 22, 2014, defendants Cheng and Liu were arrested and subsequently truthfully confessed the criminal facts of this case. They were administratively detained for ten days on October 22, 2014, by the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city for drug use in this case. Defendants Cheng and Liu raised no objection to the above facts during the court trial, supported by witness testimonies from Li, Zhu, Qian, Zhou, Dou, the inspection record and photos made by the district's public security bureau, and documented use locations and paraphernalia, a list of confiscated items, case report, the decision of public security administrative punishment, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Cheng and Liu, sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that in January 2016, the defendants Chen and Tao, after consultation, had Chen purchase two sets of gaming machines with 16 independent operational units that allowed one person to engage in gambling activities, namely \"Little Fish Machine\" and \"Roulette Machine.\" Defendant Tao funded the rental of car garages No. 7 and 8 at Building 26, Shanyang Huayuan Community, a town in the county, and placed the gambling machines purchased by Chen in the rented garages for others to gamble. They also hired people to look after the casino. On April 18, 2016, they were caught on the spot by public security officers, and the county public security bureau seized the 16 gambling machines on the spot. After the incident, defendants Chen and Tao, after being summoned by phone by the public security bureau, voluntarily surrendered to the authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. These facts were not contested by defendants Chen and Tao during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies of witnesses Wu, Liu, Li, Sun, the evidence preservation list issued by the county public security bureau, physical evidence photos, on-site records, the appraisal opinion issued by the Security Police Brigade of Yancheng Public Security Bureau, and criminal judgments, proof of serving sentences, and other evidence retrieved by the county public security bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that the defendants, Wang and Xiang, were employed in May 2014 by Huang (handled in a separate case) at an illegal nickel plating processing plant in a certain village in a certain town in Yueqing City. During this period, the two defendants were responsible for work such as degreasing, acid washing, nickel plating, rust prevention, and cleaning of products. The wastewater that adhered to the products when they were taken out from the tank or barrel, as well as the discarded wastewater, was discharged directly into the ditch without any measures being taken. On August 12 of the same year, the processing plant was discovered. Upon testing water samples extracted from the plating tank, plastic barrels, and ground seepage points within the plant, the content of heavy metals such as nickel and hexavalent chromium exceeded the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Xiang during the court trial and are corroborated by evidence such as the testimony of witness Zhu, the seizure list and photos, the arrest process, the monitoring report, the acknowledgment document, the identification record, the inspection record, the site investigation record, the verification of previous convictions, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charges: At approximately 3 a.m. on June 28, 2020, Wen, Yan, Liu, and others, along with the defendants Li, Wen, and another individual named Li A, arrived at Mino Frog Bar, located at 388 Jinggangshan Avenue, Anyuan Town, a district in a certain city. There, Wen, Yan, Liu, and others got into a physical altercation with Zhu. The victim, another individual named Li, seeing this situation, called 110 to report to the police and said to Zhu, \"Don't hang out with this group of kids.\" Li, Wen, and Li A felt upset upon hearing these words and subsequently used fists, kicks, and sticks to assault Li. According to the forensic assessment, Li's injuries were classified as minor. It was further found that the defendants Li and Wen were apprehended and brought to justice on June 28, 2020, and after being taken into custody, they voluntarily and truthfully confessed to their crimes. Additionally, it was discovered that the defendants Li and Wen reached a reconciliation agreement with the victim Li, who issued a letter of understanding, expressing forgiveness for the actions of Li and Wen.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county alleges that between August 2011 and July 2012, the Zhengzhou Dongfeng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., to which defendants Yang and Li belonged, contracted the construction project of Dingsheng Garden residential area in a certain county and hired a work crew led by a person named Li for repairs. By the time the project was halted, wages totaling 185,300 yuan were owed to 12 workers. In the absence of success after multiple requests by the workers for their wages, the defendants absconded. After the county's Human Resources and Social Security Bureau issued an order to rectify within a specified period, they still failed to pay within the stipulated timeframe. The public prosecution agency presented to the court evidence including witness statements, victim testimonies, the labor security supervision order to rectify within a specified period, the workers' wage statements, identification records, and the defendants' confessions regarding the facts alleged in the indictment.", "label": {"Yang": [], "Li": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that between November 30, 2013, and May 17, 2014, defendant Zhang, taking advantage of his position as a cashier at the outpatient department of Donghai County People's Hospital, upon the request of defendant Wang, embezzled outpatient fees by failing to submit them and their reports, as well as using the receipts of other cashiers without submitting them afterward. In total, they privately retained 19 sums of outpatient fees amounting to 504,715.14 yuan for Wang's use, which were not reimbursed for over three months. After the incident was uncovered, defendants Zhang and Wang returned all embezzled funds to the hospital on September 6 and September 7, 2014, respectively, and subsequently turned themselves in to the judicial authorities on October 9 and October 10, 2014, confessing the criminal facts truthfully. To prove the charges, the prosecution has submitted related documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the defendants' confessions and defenses along with the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Between April 2 and April 21, 2016, the defendant Weng provided funds, and the defendant Ou provided repair technology. The two of them partnered to open a game hall on the east side of Building 8, Dongsheng North District, in a certain city. They set up one \"Fishing Machine\" and one \"Dragon Machine\" gaming machine (each with 8 player positions) in the game hall, allowing others to gamble by exchanging cash (RMB) for game points, thus illegally profiting over 8,200 yuan, with Weng holding a 90% share and Ou holding a 10% share. The actions of the defendants Weng and Ou have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. Defendant Weng is the principal culprit, and defendant Ou is an accessory. A legal sentence is requested. It is also found that on April 21, 2016, the public security organ seized two gaming machines in the game hall. After appraisal, it was determined that the seized \"Dragon Machine\" and \"Fishing Machine\" have gambling functions. After the case occurrence, defendant Weng has returned the illegal gains of 8,200 yuan. The aforementioned facts have been undisputed by defendants Weng and Ou during the trial, and are supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and cross-examined in court: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Confessions of defendants Weng and Ou; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Liu, Ji, Ye, and Liao; 4. Identification report on electronic game facilities and equipment by a certain district public security branch, [2016] No. 02; 5. On-site inspection records and photos; 6. Identification records; 7. Electronic evidence inspection work records; 8. Administrative penalty decision; 9. Process of arrest; 10. A document from a certain city's public security bureau titled \"Notice on Adjusting Personnel Qualified to Identify Electronic Game Facilities and Equipment with Gambling Functions Citywide\"; 11. Evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation list, seizure decision, and seizure list; 12. Bank transaction records; 13. Proof of payment return, etc., confirm that the evidence is indeed sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Weng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ou": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in June 2015, the defendants Mai and Liang repeatedly allowed and conspired with the drug user Liao, a female, to use their rented apartment at Unit A, 601 Xinghua Court, Xijiang North Road, Duanzhou District, in a certain city, to consume the drug ketamine (commonly known as \"K powder\"). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Mai and Liang during the court hearing, and are substantiated by the following evidence presented by the prosecution: defendants' confessions, witness testimonies, an on-site testing report, on-site inspection records and photographs, and identification records and photographs. All of the above evidence has been cross-examined in court and confirmed by this court.", "label": {"Mai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on August 4, 2013, at around 20:00, in the east of Jiuxian Bridge in a certain city, Zhao (handled in a separate case) got into a fight with Mao due to a trivial matter. Zhao later called the defendant Xing, who gathered Tian, Liu, and others to drive to the vicinity of Jiuxian Bridge on Communist Youth League Road in a certain city. Defendants Xing, Tian, and Liu used iron rods and folding stools to assault Mao. According to the assessment, the victim Mao sustained minor injuries. The prosecutor read aloud and presented evidence in court to support the charges in the indictment, including the criminal case registration form, household registration information, case handling explanation, the victim Mao's statement, witness Wang's testimony, the confessions of defendants Xing, Tian, and Liu, and the forensic medical assessment of human injury degree.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Xing": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Zhangwan District in a certain city charges: On the evening of July 13, 2014, at approximately 23:00, defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, Zhou, and others were drinking at the Congress Bar in Zhangwan District of a certain city. While participating in a prize-winning quiz activity organized by the bar, defendant Hu had a dispute with Yuan and pushed him down. Subsequently, Qi, who was accompanying Yuan, and others got into a conflict with defendants Hu and others, leading to a mutual fight. Defendants Hu and Gong used dice cups to hit victim Qi, while defendant Sun used a beer bottle to assault Qi. Later, defendant Zhou struck victim Qi on the head with his knee. According to forensic identification, the injuries to Qi's scalp and right zygomatic region were both classified as minor injuries of the second degree. Additionally, it was found that after the incident, defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou jointly compensated the victims Qi, Xia, and Gao 120,000 yuan for medical expenses. On August 13, 2014, defendant Hu signed a compensation agreement with victims Qi, Xia, and Gao, in which Hu agreed to make a one-time compensation of 40,000 yuan to victims Qi, Xia, and Gao, which has been fully paid. On the same day, victim Qi issued a letter of forgiveness towards defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou. On October 11, 2014, Xia and Gao issued an application to waive forensic identification. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou during the trial. Moreover, corroborating evidence includes: 1. The case acceptance registration form and case filing decision from Zhangwan District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city; 2. Written evidence including the account of the incident, medical records, discharge records, settlement agreement, letter of forgiveness, application, and the defendants’ residence registration; 3. Forensic Medicine Institute's forensic medical injury assessment report from the Public Security Department of a certain city (No. 2014Z213); 4. Identification records and photos; 5. Testimonies from witnesses Liao, Yuan, and others; 6. Statements from victims Qi and Gao; 7. Confessions and defenses from defendants Hu, Gong, Sun, and Zhou. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City charges that between June 2015 and August 2015, defendants Lai and Huang successively went to Jianggong Road, Aiguo East Road, Yida Plaza, Datian Village, Xinshi Street Airport Road, Banghu Village in Renhe Town, and Aiguo West Road in a certain district of the city. They committed theft a total of eleven times, stealing items worth more than 15,540 yuan. To substantiate the facts of the charge, the public prosecution agency has submitted evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, and documentary evidence along with the case. According to this,", "label": {"Lai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Liaoning Province charges: Defendant Meng, during the period from June to August 2019, separately went to \"Baiyun Zen Temple\" in a certain city of a state, \"Chongxing Zen Temple\" in a certain town, and \"Xiangyun Temple\" in a certain township of a city, committing theft on three occasions, stealing a total of 21,500 yuan in cash. Defendant Meng, in collaboration with defendant Liu, during August 2019, separately went to \"Shifo Temple\" in a certain county of a province, \"Ping’an Temple\" in a certain county, \"Dafa Temple\" in a township of a certain city, \"Baiyun Law Temple\" in a certain township, \"Wanyuan Building\" in a town of a certain city, and \"Longyuan Temple\" in a town of a certain county, committing theft on six occasions, stealing a total of 11,700 yuan in cash, two strands of prayer beads, four bracelets, and one white jade Buddha statue. Defendant Meng, in collaboration with defendant Zhang, during the period from June to August 2019, separately went to \"a temple\" in a banner of a certain city, a temple in a county, \"Pushan Palace\" in a town of a county, \"a temple\" in a town of a county, \"Ganlu Temple\" in a certain mountain, \"Wanghai Temple\" in a district of a city, \"Longquan Zen Temple\", \"Wanfo Zen Temple\" in a county, \"Shishan Foguang Temple\" in a town of a certain city, \"Dehui Temple\" in a county, and \"Chunxing Temple\" in a county of a province, committing theft on twelve occasions, stealing a total of 19,140 yuan in cash, two strands of Buddhist beads, and one bracelet. Defendants Meng, Liu, and Zhang were each apprehended and brought to justice. Regarding the above charges, the public prosecution agency read aloud in court and presented search warrants, search records, and other documentary evidence; statements from victims such as Jia and others; testimonies from witnesses such as Guo and others; confessions and defenses from defendants Meng, Liu, and Zhang; site survey records; and site identification records, among other evidence.", "label": {"Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on May 29, 2020, at around 20:30, defendants Qi and Wang stole 50 meters of HYA600x2x0.4 model communication cable from China Mobile Tietong Telecommunications Co., Ltd., Changchun Branch, located outside a certain district in the city. Subsequently, Qi sold the stolen cables, received 1710 RMB, and gave Wang 700 RMB. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables were valued at 3000 RMB. After the incident, Qi and Wang compensated the victimized unit for its losses and obtained its understanding.", "label": {"Qi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: On March 25, 2015, at around 7:00 p.m., the defendant Jin engaged in an argument with the victim Hu at a Zhongtong Express company in a village in Yaoxi Street, Longwan District, Wenzhou City due to a problem with scanning goods. The defendant Wei (Jin's wife) heard the quarrel and went over to reason with Hu, leading to a dispute between them. Subsequently, Wei slapped Hu twice, and the two began to grapple on the ground. Seeing this, Jin came forward and kicked Hu twice in the waist, while Wei continued to assault Hu. After Wei got up, she once again joined Jin in kicking Hu, and then the two were separated by others. According to an assessment, Hu suffered minor injuries of secondary degree. After the incident, the two defendants compensated the victim Hu with 4,500 yuan for medical expenses. For the aforementioned facts, the public prosecution agency provided corresponding evidence.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In early 2013, the defendants Wang and Xue conspired to commit online fraud. They co-rented room 827 at Peace Plaza, Meilan District, in a city of a certain province, and separately purchased items such as phone cards, mobile phones, bulletin board systems, and bank cards. On the morning of March 27, 2013, the victim, Feng, while at his office in Taizhou Sanfu Ship Engineering Co., Ltd., saw the false information posted by defendant Wang on the internet about increasing the transaction limit of Alipay and contacted defendant Wang. Under the pretext of helping him operate, defendant Wang coaxed victim Feng into adding him as a friend and enabling the QQ remote assistance feature. Defendant Wang then used online banking transfers to deceive victim Feng into transferring 100,000 RMB from his Bank of China account to an account under the name Xu. Defendant Wang instructed defendant Xue to continue answering victim Feng's calls. Defendant Xue, knowing that defendant Wang was committing fraud, still assisted by answering victim Feng's calls and gained his trust. Later, on the grounds of needing to verify bank card information, defendant Wang once again deceived victim Feng into transferring 60,000 RMB from his bank card to the Bank of China account under the name Xu via online banking transfers. Subsequently, defendant Wang transferred the defrauded 160,000 RMB to other bank cards through online banking and instructed \"Ake\" (handled in another case) to withdraw all the cash via a bank ATM. After being apprehended, defendant Wang returned all the illicit money, which the public security organs have given back to victim Feng. After their arrest, defendants Wang and Xue truthfully confessed their crimes. During the litigation, defendant Xue prepaid a property penalty deposit of 30,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Wang and Xue during the court trial, and are confirmed by evidence including physical items such as phones and computers seized by the public security organs, retrieved QQ chat records, online banking transaction records, testimonies from the witnesses Wang and Yang, and the victim Feng's statement, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that in early 2019, the defendant Hou, while working at a certain estate in his village, met Wang Keke, who came to inquire about purchasing Lan Jinhua seedlings, and agreed to sell them to Wang Keke. Defendant Hou contacted defendant Wang to plan to steal Lan Jinhua from a mountain in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area of a certain county. The two defendants jointly stole 418 Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants, with a total value of 4,225 yuan. Defendant Hou alone stole 80 Lan Jinhua plants, valued at 800 yuan. The specific criminal facts are as follows: 1. Around 1 p.m. on February 19, 2019, defendant Hou went alone to the east slope of a mountain called \"Lao Moumou Dongzi Mountain\" in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 80 wild Lan Jinhua plants, which he sold to Wang Keke. 2. Around 1 p.m. on February 20, 2019, defendant Hou and defendant Wang went together to the east slope of a mountain called \"Zhishi Goushan\" in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 260 wild Lan Jinhua plants, which they sold to Wang Keke. 3. Around 1 p.m. on February 22, 2019, defendant Hou and defendant Wang again went to the east slope of the same \"Zhishi Goushan\" mountain in the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area and used a small pick to steal 158 wild Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants. After the incident, the investigative authorities seized the 158 stolen Lan Jinhua plants and 3 Yingshanhong plants according to the law and returned them to the Jiuxianshan Scenic Area in a certain county on February 27, 2019. Defendants Hou and Wang voluntarily turned over compensation payments of 2,500 yuan each on March 18, 2019, totaling 5,000 yuan. The investigative authorities delivered the above compensation to Wulian Mountain Water Tourism Development Co., Ltd. on August 10, 2019.", "label": {"Hou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charges: 1. On September 17, 2015, at approximately 12:00, defendants Chen and Tan arrived at the 5th floor of Building B, Block 18, East District, a certain village in a certain district, to a certain technology company. Taking advantage of the victim Wu leaving the office and the office door being unlocked, the two entered the office and stole a black iPhone 4 placed on Wu's desk. They later sold it for 200 RMB and split the proceeds. 2. On October 12, 2015, at approximately 12:00, Chen and Tan arrived at the 2nd-floor office, Building 2, Second Industrial Zone, Xili, a certain district. Tan stood guard outside while Chen entered the office and stole a silver Apple laptop placed on the victim Lu's desk. They later sold it for 1,500 RMB and split the proceeds. According to an appraisal, the stolen Apple laptop was valued at 4,960 RMB. 3. On November 10, 2015, at approximately 12:00, Chen and Tan arrived at the East Block, Floor 802, a certain Lighting Company, Xili, a certain district. Chen stood guard outside while Tan entered the office and stole a white Huawei P7 phone from the victim Nong's desk, a black Xiaomi 2A phone from the victim Wu's desk, and a white Huawei Honor 6PLUS phone from the victim He. They later sold them for a total of 650 RMB and split the proceeds. During the trial, neither defendant Chen nor Tan disputed the above facts, which are verified by evidence such as surveillance video screenshots from the scene of the theft and surrounding areas, details of their arrest, residential registration information of the defendants, an administrative punishment decision, statements from the victims Wu, Lu, Wu, Nong, and He, confessions and defenses from defendants Chen and Tan, a price appraisal report, site investigation records and photographs, as well as surveillance footage from the crime scene and nearby roads. The evidence is sufficient to confirm the facts. The public prosecution agency submitted sentencing recommendation document No. 304 issued by the Shen Nan Procuratorate in 2016, suggesting a sentence of no more than one year in prison for the two defendants.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On March 28, 2005, at approximately 11:40 PM, defendants Wang and Shi, after prior consultation, carried burglary tools—a screwdriver—to the \"Certain Internet Cafe\" operated by victims Weng and He in a certain city of a certain province, intending to commit theft. Defendants Wang and Shi initially accessed the internet in a private room at the Internet cafe. During this time, taking advantage of the store owner Weng's sleep and the absence of other people in the store, defendant Shi acted as a lookout while defendant Wang used a screwdriver to remove and steal CPU processors and memory sticks from 10 computer mainframes. After the crime, defendant Wang sold the stolen CPU processors and memory sticks to another person for 500 yuan, and the proceeds were spent jointly with defendant Shi. According to the price appraisal by a city's Price Appraisal Center, the 10 Goldstar DDR4001G memory sticks and 10 Intel PD840 CPU processors involved in the case were valued at a total of 21,160 yuan. On November 27, 2014, defendants Wang and Shi returned 21,160 yuan to victims Weng and He, obtaining their forgiveness.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain location charges that on August 13, 2015, defendants Chen and Wang agreed to go hunting together on a mountain in a certain village on August 16 of the same year. At approximately 5 a.m. on August 16, 2015, defendant Wang drove while Chen was a passenger, and both carried a hunting rifle each to a mountain col in the village to hunt, but were unsuccessful. Defendant Chen handed his hunting rifle to Wang for safekeeping and agreed to hunt together next time, then they both went home. The fact that the two defendants were illegally possessing firearms while hunting was anonymously reported to the You County Public Security Bureau. On August 19, 2015, defendants Chen and Wang surrendered themselves to the public security authorities with the hunting rifles they had. Upon assessment, the hunting rifles held by Chen and Wang were determined to be firearms. The above facts are supported by the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Wang, residence registration certificates, photo identifications, a report on their arrival process by the public security organ, and expert opinions. After trial cross-examination, defendants Chen and Wang raised no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged by the public prosecution agency, and this court confirms them.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. In 2011, defendants Liu and Liu, under the guise of labor dispatch, processed various qualification certificates at their \"Liu Labor Dispatch\" storefront. Seven individuals, including Xu B, Xu A, and Xu C, went to \"Liu Labor Dispatch\" to obtain a \"Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificate,\" each paying cash amounts varying from 800 to 900 yuan. It was found that Liu and Liu, knowing full well that defendant Zhang had neither the qualifications nor the authority to issue \"Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificates,\" still facilitated the issuance of such certificates for others, deducting about 200 yuan as processing fees per certificate, then passing the applicants' photocopied IDs, photos, and the remaining cash on to Zhang. Zhang, aware that defendant Ma lacked the qualifications or authority to issue \"Road Transport Personnel Qualification Certificates,\" still facilitated the issuance of such certificates for others, keeping 50 or 100 yuan per transaction, then passing the remainder to Ma. Ma kept 100 yuan of the processing fee before handing it over to Dong from Feixiang in a certain province. Verified by the Transport Management Office of the Handan City Transportation Bureau in a certain province, the aforementioned seven individuals did not process a road transport qualification certificate at the bureau. The above facts are not contested by defendants Liu, Zhang, Ma, and Liu during the trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by documentary and material evidence, witness testimonies, the case investigation process, and the confessions of the defendants. 2. Around 2011, defendant Liu, knowing that Guo had not undergone professional electrician skills training, still sold Guo a forged electrician certificate for about 200 yuan for personal profit. The above facts are also uncontested by defendant Liu during the trial, and are sufficiently confirmed by documentary and material evidence, witness testimonies, the case investigation process, and the defendant’s confession.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: 1. Between October and November 2015, the defendant Zhang funded two occasions for Liu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\" or \"crystal meth\") in a room at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county. 2. In early January 2016, the defendant Zheng accommodated the defendant Zhang to use methamphetamine in Zheng's dormitory in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county. 3. On February 7, 2016, the defendant Zheng funded the use of room 339 at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county for the defendant Zhang and Liu to use methamphetamine. 4. Around February 12, 2016, after the defendant Zheng handled the check-in procedures and paid the room fee in advance, and then was reimbursed by the defendant Zhang, the two of them together accommodated Liu in a room at the Huixiong Business Hotel in a certain town of a certain county to use methamphetamine. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Zheng during the trial and are substantiated by: 1. the case-solving process, arrest process, household registration proof, accommodation registration, on-site test report; 2. witness Liu's testimony and identification records; 3. confessions, defenses, and identification records of the defendants Zhang and Zheng, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: 1. Defendant Wang is accused of X crime. Since November 2018, Wang has repeatedly sold 4.2 grams of methcathinone to Li. From January to March 2020, Wang has repeatedly sold 2 grams of methcathinone to defendant Song. 2. Song is accused of X crime. From January to March 2020, Song allowed Wang to use methcathinone at his pig farm residence in Gaoping City on four occasions. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, expert opinions, and other evidence in court.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Song": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wuchang District, a city in Hubei Province, charges: On November 20, 2013, at approximately 3:00 PM, defendants Li and Tao, at the bicycle parking area of Exit A of Jiyuqiao Subway Station on Heping Avenue, Wuchang District, used the method of prying open the handlebar lock to steal a Yadea TDP312Z electric bicycle (worth 2,300 RMB), which was parked there by a person named Yin. As the defendants Li and Tao were fleeing the scene, they were apprehended by the police. The stolen property has been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Tao during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. Furthermore, these facts are confirmed by the following evidence provided by the prosecution, presented and verified in court: 1. Documentation from the police on the arrest process, case resolution, and explanations of circumstances; 2. List of seized and returned items, and photos of the physical evidence; 3. The victim Yin's report and statement; 4. Confessions from defendants Li and Tao; 5. The price appraisal report; 6. Record of the case. This is sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local people's procuratorate charged that, with the consent of her daughter Wang, the defendant Sun arranged for Wang to meet Bian through a matchmaker sometime in September 2012 and falsely claimed that she was willing to marry Bian. Subsequently, the two defendants defrauded Bian's mother, Zhao, of engagement gifts amounting to 13,700 yuan and 41,000 yuan on two separate occasions, and further defrauded Zhao of 13,000 yuan in cash on four occasions between September and December of the same year. All the amounts obtained were later squandered.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that starting in July 2015, the defendant Chen, for the purpose of illegal profit, successively purchased a large number of counterfeit cigarettes from \"Little Wang\" (identity unknown, at large) and stored them in a warehouse he rented located next to Jinjiaocao Primary School in a village in Zhonggongmiao Street, Yinzhou District, a certain city. At the same time, he had his wife, the defendant Yang, sell these counterfeit cigarettes as genuine products at their business, \"Lili Commercial Firm,\" located at 304 Ningnan North Road, Yinzhou District, which did not have a tobacco retail license. On October 14 of the same year, the defendant Chen was apprehended by police near China CITIC Bank, on the north side of Wanda Plaza in a certain city, Yinzhou District, and found large quantities of cigarettes in his car, \"Lili Commercial Firm,\" and the warehouse. Upon assessment, 27.5 packs of genuine cigarettes and 114.5 packs of counterfeit and inferior cigarettes with forged trademarks were seized at \"Lili Commercial Firm,\" totaling a value of 47,073.48 RMB. From the car and the warehouse, 804.7 packs of cigarettes were all found to be counterfeit and inferior cigarettes with forged trademarks, amounting to a total value of 328,507 RMB. During this period, the defendants Chen and Yang had cumulatively sold cigarettes amounting to 25,494 RMB, gaining illegal profits exceeding 20,000 RMB. On the same day, the defendant Yang was summoned to the police station. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Yang during the court trial, and were corroborated by witness testimonies, search records, seizure orders and inventories, a cigarette identification test report from the provincial tobacco quality supervision and testing station, a tobacco product price verification document from the province, identification transcripts and photos, accounting books and lists, photos of the case, the house lease agreement, explanations, arrest procedures, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: Jin Hongrun Textile Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jin Hongrun Company) in a certain city owed processing fees of 17,740 yuan and 56,800 yuan respectively to defendants Zhou and Xuan. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to collect these fees, on the morning of February 26, 2014, defendants Zhou and Xuan learned of the whereabouts of Jin Hongrun Company's boss and rushed to the entrance of Jin Hongrun Company located on Jiangbei Road, Datang Town, of a certain city. The defendants Zhou and Xuan then entered the company and, failing to find the boss, used tools such as bricks, scissors, and a kitchen knife to smash a Jiangling brand box truck with the license plate D××××× belonging to Jin Hongrun Company. The city price certification center appraised the damaged parts of the vehicle at a value of 7,536 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhou and Xuan voluntarily went to the public security organ to surrender and truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provides this court with household registration certificates, civil judgment, photos, testimonies of witnesses Yan, He, Xiong, and others, the arrest process documentation, and other evidence. The prosecution of a certain city believes that defendants Zhou and Xuan intentionally damaged public and private property, which constitutes a large amount, and should be held criminally responsible for x crime, as it is a joint crime. In light of defendants Zhou’s and Xuan’s voluntary surrender after committing the crime, they may be given a lighter punishment according to law. The court is requested to punish the two defendants respectively in accordance with the provisions of Article x, Article x, and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhou and Xuan have no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After cross-examining the evidence during the trial, the evidence transferred by the prosecution was verified to be true. This court confirms the facts of the prosecution's charges against defendants Zhou and Xuan for committing x crime. It was additionally discovered that after the incident, defendants Zhou and Xuan reached a compensation agreement with the victim, compensating the victim's economic loss with 10,000 yuan and obtaining the victim's understanding.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention"], "Xuan": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that defendants Ou and Xu, a married couple, were involved in a civil loan dispute with Liu. Liu sued them at the Xichuan County People's Court. On February 17, 2017, the Xichuan County People's Court issued a civil judgment (2017) Yu 1326 Min Chu No. 178, ordering Ou and Xu to repay Liu 100,000 yuan within ten days after the judgment took effect. After the judgment became effective, defendants Ou and Xu did not fulfill the obligations of the judgment. Subsequently, Liu applied for mandatory enforcement. The Xichuan County People's Court filed the case on April 12, 2017, and on the same day, sent an enforcement notice, summons, and order to report assets to Ou and Xu, demanding they fulfill the obligations of the judgment by April 19, 2017. However, defendants Ou and Xu, despite being capable of fulfilling the obligations, refused to do so. On May 18, 2017, the Xichuan County People's Court decided to fine them 3,000 yuan, and on June 10, 2017, it imposed 15 days of judicial detention on Xu. On June 19, 2017, Xu and Liu reached a settlement agreement, and Xu repaid 10,000 yuan to Liu on the same day, agreeing that the remaining amount would be fully paid by June 30, 2018. On the same day, the Xichuan County People's Court lifted defendant Xu's judicial detention. Defendants Ou and Xu, despite being capable, still refused to fulfill the obligations of the judgment. After the incident, defendants Ou and Xu fulfilled all the obligations specified in the judgment. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ou and Xu during the trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from An, Zheng, Wan, Shang, and others, as well as evidence such as the divorce registration form, case closure certification, Xichuan County People's Court enforcement dossier, the account of apprehension, criminal record check, and household registration certificate, sufficiently establishing the case.", "label": {"Ou": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From December 2014 to January 2015, the defendants Yu, Liu, and Chen collaborated at a certain chess and card room at No. 200, Qiangan Road, in a town in Pinghu City, organizing gambling activities in the form of \"Tong Zi Gong\" seven times for individuals including Liu A and Xu, among others. Defendant Liu was responsible for taking a cut of the profits, while defendant Chen was responsible for keeping watch and serving drinks, resulting in illegal profits totaling over 4,500 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including the case registration form, witness testimonies, arrest records, the criminal judgment, criminal background checks, and identification proof, thereby sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On October 14, 2013, at around 12 PM, defendants Wei and Zhang had an argument with Jiang Yi over trivial matters in the kitchen of the F xx Garment Factory located in Dongfeng Village, Feiyun Street, Ruian City, which then led to a physical altercation. Subsequently, the two parties engaged in another fight on the road outside the kitchen. During this fight, after Jiang Yi fell to the ground, defendants Wei and Zhang continued to punch him and kicked his waist and abdomen, causing injuries. According to the medical examination, the main injuries sustained by the victim, Jiang Yi, were a facial laceration 1.8 cm in length; fractures of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 9th ribs on the left side; and a pneumothorax on the left side. The injuries were classified as minor. After the incident, defendants Wei and Zhang surrendered to the public security authorities on October 25 and November 27, 2013, respectively. A mediation agreement was reached with the victim, Jiang Yi, with compensation of 15,000 yuan, and forgiveness was obtained. During the court hearing, defendant Wei raised no objection to the aforementioned facts, which are confirmed by the statements of the victim Jiang Yi, testimonies from witnesses Jiang Jia, Ai Jia, Ai Yi, and Chen, inspection records, identification records, a CT examination report, a forensic medical injury assessment report, the mediation agreement, a receipt, a report on waiving criminal liability, records of surrender, explanatory notes, and population information, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Wei": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that from early 2016 to February 17, defendant Liao operated a casino at Huiqun Chess and Card Room, Dawei Industrial Zone, Wenhua North Road, Chancheng District, in a certain city. Liao attracted gamblers to gamble by playing \"Three Cards\" with poker and profited by taking a rake from the games. Defendant Wang, Liao's husband, recruited gamblers by participating in the games, and defendant Li was responsible for dealing cards and collecting the rake at the casino. After collecting the rake, Liao used the remaining funds for meals and entertainment with Wang, Li, and others after expenses were deducted. On February 17, 2016, at around 11 PM, the casino was apprehended by police while organizing gambling activities at the above location. The police caught defendants Liao, Li, and Wang at the scene, along with nine gamblers, and seized gambling funds of 9,710 yuan and a rake of 1,260 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Liao, Li, and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Xu, Liu, Tan, Zhang A, Zhang B, Huang, Xiao, Chen, and Wu; the crime scene investigation and search records; scene photos; arrest process documentation; lists of seized items; detention lists; temporary seizure receipts; cash payment slips; item transfer lists with the case; household registration certificates; and the confessions and identification records of defendants Liao, Li, and Wang during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around the year 2000, defendants Zheng and Du jointly invested in the establishment of the Hengshui Wanxiang Electroplating Factory, with Zheng as the legal representative. This factory was later renamed Hengshui Xishui Electroplating Factory and Hengshui Dashun Metal Surface Treatment Co., Ltd. Zheng was responsible for the west courtyard workshop of the company, while Du was responsible for the east courtyard workshop. Around 2010, Zheng's brother-in-law, defendant Zhao, leased two workshops in the west courtyard from Zheng to engage in galvanizing business. During their operations, the three defendants discharged the wastewater generated from galvanizing into pipelines and sedimentation tanks without anti-seepage measures and stored over three tons of wastewater in a wastewater treatment pool without anti-seepage measures. According to the judicial appraisal by Cangzhou Science and Technology Affairs Judicial Appraisal Center, the wastewater from the galvanizing workshop of Hengshui Dashun Metal Surface Treatment Co., Ltd. is classified as hazardous waste, with the hazardous characteristic being T. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants and their defense attorneys during the court hearing. Furthermore, witness testimonies from individuals such as Liu, Wu, Sun, and Wang, along with on-site inspections, examination records, and photographs, and the judicial appraisal report, all serve as sufficient evidence to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xiangqiao District, a certain city, charges: Defendants Chen and Ding, at approximately 4:00 a.m. on October 9, 2015, while driving a car near the entrance of XX Residential Area on Xinqiao East Road in a certain city, got into a dispute with defendants Zhuang and Liu, who were driving a Buick sedan. Subsequently, defendant Chen used a steel pipe to assault the victim Liu, and when the victim Zhuang tried to intervene, he was also assaulted by Chen. Afterwards, defendants Chen and Ding left the scene by car and gathered defendant Fan along with accomplices Chen Tian and Xie Hong (both at large) and others to return to Sanli Street to seek revenge against the victims Liu and Zhuang. Seeing this, victims Zhuang and Liu fled, and defendants Chen, Chen Tian, Xie Hong, and others chased the two victims with steel pipes and a \"cross\" iron frame, and used these tools to smash the iron gate of the Light Industry Dormitory Community on Sanli Street, Xinqiao East Road in a certain city. Defendants Chen, Ding, Fan, and Chen Tian used tools such as steel pipes to smash a Buick sedan with license plate number XXXXXX, left at the scene by victim Zhuang, causing damage to the car. Later, the group of defendants again left the scene by car and, passing by an unnamed silver shop on Xinqiao East Road in a certain city, encountered the victim Liu. The defendants and their accomplices again used tools such as steel pipes to assault the victim Liu. According to forensic evaluation, Liu's injury was classified as minor injury level 2; Zhuang's injury was classified as minor; the damage to victim Zhuang's Buick car was valued at 5,272 RMB. The prosecution provides the defendants' confessions at the public security and procuratorial authorities, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification records, forensic opinions, and related documentary and physical evidence as proof.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On July 15, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Liu, in order to obtain illegal profits, set up a casino in Room 208 of the chess and card room at XX Hotel in Taizhou, agreeing to split the profits equally. They organized gambling activities by playing \"mahjong,\" involving participants including Wang, Jin, Jiang, and Cai. The casino was discovered and shut down on the afternoon of July 18 of the same month, by which time it had profited 12,000 RMB through rake-off. On July 18, the defendants Zhao and Liu were apprehended. During the trial, the defendants Zhao and Liu each returned illegal gains amounting to 6,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhao and Liu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of gamblers Wang, Jin, Jiang, Cai, and Ruan, as well as inspection records and photographs, identification transcripts, the arrest process, defendant Zhao A's previous criminal judgment, and the public security administrative penalty decision, sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province charges: On a certain day in October 2019, the defendants Chen and Pan1, Shen1 (both handled in separate cases) conspired to steal the victim Ye's mobile phone, which Shen1 then sold. In the early morning of October 30, 2019, the defendant Chen invited the victim Ye to a room in a certain building on the north side of a certain square in a certain district of a certain city where Chen was renting, for an overnight stay. Pan1 took the opportunity to steal the victim Ye's black iPhone XS Max (valued at 4877 RMB as appraised), and Shen1 sold the phone in a certain city of a certain province for 5100 RMB. The defendant Chen received 2400 RMB as his share. On October 30, 2019, the defendant Zhu, knowing the phone was stolen by Shen1, still, at Shen1's request, used the method of cash advance through the credit card linked to the victim Ye’s Alipay on the stolen phone to steal, obtaining 5300 RMB from the victim Ye. The defendant Zhu received 2230 RMB as his share of the stolen money. After the case was solved, the defendants Chen, Zhu, Pan1, and Shen1 collectively returned 10,800 RMB of stolen money to the victim Ye, who expressed understanding towards the defendants Chen, Zhu, and others.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xuanwu District, Nanjing City, a certain province, charges that in September 2018, the defendants Liu, Shi, and Wang harbored each other and others to use the drug marijuana at their respective residences in a certain city of a certain province.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province charges that on February 9, 2016, at around 2 p.m., defendants Lu and Hu broke the window of a black Highlander SUV parked next to the Fenghua Tiancheng residential area parking lot in this city district using a rock. They stole a black bag from inside the car, which contained more than 5,000 yuan. On February 24, 2016, defendants Lu and Hu, while being questioned by the public security authorities due to suspicious behavior, confessed to the aforementioned criminal act.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: \n\n1. In late October 2014, the defendant Zhong, together with Wang A (handled in a separate case), organized and attracted gamblers, including Xu and Ling, to gather and gamble in the form of \"Tongzigong\" twice inside the fruit district store 603, Building 6, at the wholesale market for agricultural and sideline products on Zhenxing West Road in the city. The defendant Wang was arranged to take a rake-off, and they profited approximately over 4000 yuan in total.\n\n2. In early November 2014, the defendant Zhong, together with Wang A, organized and attracted gamblers, including Xu and Ling, to gather and gamble in the form of \"Tongzigong\" twice inside Zhiccheng Weaving Co., Ltd. in Shimen Town, a certain city. The defendant Wang was arranged to take a rake-off, and they profited approximately over 4000 yuan in total.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on the afternoon of October 1, 2014, defendants Sun and Han, along with others, unlawfully restricted the personal freedom of the victim, Wang, at Sun's residence located at the Lu Hun Reservoir Management Bureau family compound on Chuangye Road in the high-tech zone of a certain city, in order to demand repayment of a debt from Wang. They also assaulted Wang, forcing him to issue an IOU to both of them. On the same day, defendants Sun and Han, along with others, took Wang to Sun's rented residence in Zhongtai Century City on Lichun West Road in the Jianxi District of a certain city, where they used assault and threats to coerce Wang into repaying the debt. Later, due to a report to the police by Wang's family, Sun and Han were apprehended. The aforementioned facts did not elicit any objection from defendants Sun and Han during the course of the trial. Furthermore, the facts are corroborated by evidence including the household registration and current behavioral proof of defendants Sun and Han, the case-solving process, proof of apprehension, list of seizures, medical diagnosis certificates, basic population information inquiry forms, receipts, explanatory statements, victim Wang's statement and report materials, the testimony of witness Wang, and the confessions of defendants Sun and Han, which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Dong instructed the defendant Gan to look for a prefabricated steel house for purchase and use. On the morning of June 3, 2015, Gan informed Dong that there was an unused container mobile house (placed by Sun from a certain village of the eighth farm in a certain district) located across from the Haitong gas station on the Fengjian Line in Heiyanzi Town, Fengnan District. Gan then took Dong to inspect the site, explaining that he knew the owner of the house but did not have contact information. Dong proposed to take the mobile house away, and Gan agreed, stating that he would negotiate with the owner if any issues arose. That afternoon, Dong hired a crane to steal the container mobile house along with a bed and other items inside. According to an appraisal, the stolen container mobile house and items inside were valued at a total of 8,746 RMB.\n\nFurthermore, on June 23, 2015, the victim, Sun, discovered the theft of his container mobile house and reported it to the police. During the investigation, the police identified Dong as a suspect and summoned him for questioning. Dong and Gan conspired for Gan to provide false testimony to the police, claiming that Dong had purchased the container mobile house from someone else. Later, when Gan was summoned by the police, he gave false testimony in an attempt to cover for Dong. After the incident, the police retrieved the stolen container mobile house and items, which were returned to the victim. Dong's relatives compensated the victim, Sun, with 1,800 RMB for economic losses.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Dong and Gan during the court proceedings and were substantiated by the victim Sun's statement, the testimony of the witness Shi, identification records and photographs, a price appraisal report, a list of seized and returned items, a letter of understanding, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Dong": ["Detention"], "Gan": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that in mid-March 2013, defendants Kong and Li were using methamphetamine together at Kong's residence, located in Room 1303 of a building in Hengsheng Haoting, a district in a certain city. Defendant Kong entrusted defendant Li to purchase methamphetamine for him. Defendant Li stated that purchasing methamphetamine required contacting his girlfriend, defendant Rong, to buy it through her friend. Subsequently, defendant Rong fronted 7,000 yuan for Kong, allowing Jiang (currently at large) to purchase 30 grams of methamphetamine from another location, 20 grams of which were for defendant Kong. On March 27, Jiang (currently at large) delivered the 30 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Rong. Later, defendant Li contacted defendant Kong and handed over 20 grams of methamphetamine to Kong under the building at Jinse Wutong community, for which defendant Kong paid 7,000 yuan. The remaining 10 grams were jointly consumed by defendants Rong and Li. On March 28, 2013, at around 11:00 PM, defendant Kong was arrested at a hotel in Huangshan Mansion in a certain district of a certain city for using drugs and purchasing drugs from Wu (dealt with separately). After being apprehended, defendant Kong voluntarily disclosed that methamphetamine was hidden in his home, and he led police officers to his residence, where 11.6 grams of methamphetamine were seized (the remaining portion of the methamphetamine purchased by defendants Li and Rong). Tests confirmed the presence of methamphetamine in the seized drugs. On December 14, 2013, defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the police after receiving a call from police officers and truthfully confessed to his criminal actions. After his arrest, defendant Li proactively contacted defendant Rong and led police officers to directly apprehend defendant Rong at the Lianghuai Howard Johnson Hotel in a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Kong, Li, and Rong during the court proceedings. These were corroborated by evidence such as the city's Public Security Bureau Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute's appraisal report, urine test report, identification transcript, search record, weight record, list of seized items, specialized drug seizure receipt, photographs, household registration certificates, detailed account of the arrest, criminal judgment, and explanatory notes, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Kong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Rong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, the court found: 1. One night in late May 2014, the defendant Liu allowed Ying to use methamphetamine together in his rented apartment at 1+1 Apartment, Room 202, Sanlukou Street, Jinhua City. 2. One night in early June 2014, the defendant Liu allowed Ying to use methamphetamine together in his rented apartment at 1+1 Apartment, Room 202, Sanlukou Street, Jinhua City. 3. On the night of September 25, 2015, the defendant Ying allowed the defendant Liu, as well as Cao and Lou (handled in separate cases), to use methamphetamine that Liu provided by heating and inhaling it in Ying's temporary residence at Room 1108, Building B, Shenhua Mansion, Sanjiang Street, Jinhua City. At around 6 a.m. on September 26, 2015, the defendants Ying and Liu were summoned by the public security authorities at the Locomotive Internet Cafe on Sanjiang Street, Jinhua City, and brought to justice. Both defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. On the same day, the police seized and confiscated a set of drug use tools in Ying's temporary residence at Room 1108, Building B, Shenhua Mansion. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Ying during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Jiang, Cao, and Lou; the on-site inspection report; the identification record; inspection record; evidence preservation list; list of confiscated items; administrative penalty decision; determination of drug addiction; compulsory isolation drug rehabilitation decision; arrest process; population information; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Liu and Ying, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ying": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused that on the afternoon of August 14, 2015, the defendants Wu and Xu, after prior discussion, drove a rented car with the license plate number Zhe J××××× to a certain village in a certain town to look for a target to steal from. Defendant Wu noticed that the first-floor window of house number 1-21, owned by an individual named Jin, was not closed, so he instructed defendant Xu to park the car in support, and then Wu got out of the car and entered Jin's house by climbing through the window. While searching for valuables on the second-floor bed, he was discovered by Jin and failed to succeed. Defendant Wu jumped out of the second-floor window to escape but was soon caught by villagers; defendant Xu fled by car. On the day of the incident, the police responded to the call, arrived on the scene, and summoned defendant Wu to the case, and later that night, defendant Xu was arrested. After coming into custody, defendant Xu truthfully confessed to the crime. The aforementioned facts, which defendants Wu and Xu did not object to during the court proceedings, are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lu, Li Jia, Chen, Li Yi, Wang, and Ye, the statement of the victim Jin, the confessions of the defendants Wu and Xu during the investigation phase, the description of the arrest process, the on-site investigation records and photographs, the identification records and photographs, the fingerprint identification report, the list of received evidence, the prior conviction judgment, the household registration certificates, and population information forms, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses that on the morning of April 6, 2019, defendants Jia and Wei, in the \"Dong XX\" private room of XX Bar in Xuanwu District of this city, took advantage of the victim Qiao's drunken and unconscious state, and Wei used his hand to touch Qiao's buttocks and inserted his finger into Qiao's vagina, committing an act of molestation. Defendant Jia attempted to engage in sexual intercourse with Qiao by rubbing his genitalia against Qiao's body, but was unsuccessful due to the failure of his genitalia to become erect.", "label": {"Jia": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Luzhai County, a District in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged that on August 16, 2013, at approximately 11:00 am, the defendant Wu, in collaboration with Ceng and Meng, carried out a premeditated plan. Wu used the arcade machine key and credit card provided by Ceng, in collusion with Meng, to steal game points from a certain store in five instances, totaling 70,000 points, which they then exchanged for cash amounting to 3,500 yuan.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Meng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on January 6, 2014, at around 18:00, the defendants Tan and Yan, after premeditation, used a screwdriver to pry open the desk drawer at the \"Xingli\" gas station operated by the victim, Xu, in a certain village, Anhai Town, of a certain city, and stole 3,600 yuan in cash. After the defendant Yan was brought to justice, the public security authorities, with his assistance, arrested the defendant Tan in a rented house in a certain village in Anhai Town. This court further ascertains that after the incident, the public security authorities retrieved a screwdriver, the tool used in the crime, from the victim Xu; the defendants' family members compensated the victim Xu for the economic loss and obtained his forgiveness. The stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Tan and Yan during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, documentary evidence retrieval list and photos, letter of forgiveness, copies of ID cards and household registration certificates, the account of solving and handling the case, on-site inspection records, photos and plans, identification records and photos, surveillance footage, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that between August 14 and 30, 2013, the defendants Zhang, Li, and Wang, under the instructions of the defendant Lan, successively used methods such as physical assault, 24-hour surveillance, and restricting communication freedom to detain He in a rented house at No. 44 Shuiyi, Shicuo Village, Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone, a certain state, with the intention of forcing He to participate in illegal pyramid schemes. By the time they were discovered on August 30, 2013, He had been illegally detained by Lan and others for a total of 11 days. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Lan, Zhang, Li, and Wang during the court trial, and are supported by the victim He's statement; the testimonies of witnesses Yu and Chen; the case investigation report from the Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone branch of a certain city's public security bureau, as well as the household registration certificates and evidence of no prior criminal records of Lan, Zhang, Li, and Wang; and the on-site investigation records and photographs from the Taiwan Businessmen Investment Zone branch of a certain city's public security bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The Jiangdong District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that from March to April 2014, the defendant, Huang, operated a casino in Room xx, Building x, xx Lane, Xurong Road, Jiangdong District, a certain city. He organized 10 to 20 people to gamble in the form of \"Stud Poker\" and made a profit of 15,000 yuan by taking commissions. The defendant, Dai, and Zhang C (handled in a separate case) were responsible for taking commissions within the casino. It is also found that the defendant, Huang, illegally profited 5,300 yuan. On April 30, 2014, the defendants, Huang and Dai, were arrested in Room xx, Building x, xx Lane, Xurong Road, Jiangdong District, a certain city. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged by the two defendants during the trial process and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang A, Lin, Xia, Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Ye, Tu, Zhou, Chen Jia, Yu, Chen Yi, Zhang B, Mao, Chu, Jin, Xue, Chen Bing, and Zheng, as well as evidence provided by the public security organs, including the household registration certificates of the two defendants, seizure decisions, seizure lists, inspection records, administrative penalty decisions, the course of capture, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Mai, for profit, together with the defendant Luo, sold methamphetamine worth 100 yuan (commonly known as \"ice\", verified to be 0.37 grams in net weight) to drug user Long Cici. This occurred around 2 a.m. on September 10, 2015, at the Huangtang Garden on XX Road, in the XX District of a certain city, where the defendant Mai was renting an accommodation.", "label": {"Mai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At around 4 a.m. on May 19, 2014, defendant Zhang, near the intersection of Xiumen Street and Beirenzijie Street in the former Qiaodong District of the city, got into a dispute with victims Di, Chen, Han, and Fu. Zhang contacted defendants Dong and Liu, and together they assaulted the four victims. During the assault, defendant Zhang instructed Dong to use a dagger, after which Dong used the dagger to stab victims Di and Chen. Defendant Liu used a belt to beat the four victims. The forensic assessment concluded that victims Di and Chen sustained second-degree serious injuries, while victims Han and Fu sustained minor injuries. The prosecution presented evidence in court regarding the above charges, including documentary evidence, witness testimonies, surveillance video, victim statements, and defendant confessions.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused: On February 6, 2016, Wang, Liu borrowed 80,000 yuan from the defendants Jin and Li, citing the need for money to undertake an engineering project, with an agreed interest of 36,000 yuan, to be repaid within three months. After the loan's due date, as Wang and Liu failed to make the repayment, the defendants Jin and Li reported to the Ningjiang Branch of the Criminal Police Brigade on December 23, 2016, claiming that Wang and Liu had defrauded them of 116,000 yuan under the pretense of obtaining a public welfare job. On the same day, the Ningjiang Branch of the Songyuan Public Security Bureau registered the case as a criminal fraud case involving Wang and Liu and began an initial investigation. By December 27, 2016, after investigation by the Ningjiang Branch of the Songyuan Public Security Bureau, it was discovered that the allegations by defendants Jin and Li against victims Wang and Liu were false, based on fabricated facts. Regarding the above accusations, the prosecution submitted the following documentary evidence to the court: proof of residence and current conduct, arrest records, bank query records, receipts, extraction transcripts, case handling explanations, and other evidence materials; testimonies from witnesses Li and another individual surnamed Li; statements from the victims Wang and Liu; and confessions from defendants Jin and Li.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On April 30, 2015, at around 9 PM, the defendants Ceng and Li were strolling to a rotary in Mayuan, Qixingguan District of a certain city when they noticed a silver-white two-wheeled scooter parked under a footbridge. The two conspired to steal the vehicle and took it to their temporary residence at the Shuangshu Bay demolition house. The next day, after getting drunk, they transported the scooter to a motorcycle repair shop to get the lock changed. While en route on Bihai Avenue, they were stopped for questioning by patrolling police officers and taken back to the police station until they sobered up. Subsequently, the two truthfully confessed to the aforementioned actions. After the incident, the police returned the motorcycle seized on-site to the victim, Zhao. The stolen motorcycle was appraised at a value of 2,188 RMB. It is believed that the defendants Ceng and Li have the following sentencing circumstances: they truthfully confessed the criminal facts upon being brought to the case, had a good attitude towards admitting guilt during the trial; the stolen vehicle was recovered and returned to the victim; Ceng has a criminal record. The established evidence includes the confessions of defendants Ceng and Li, the victim Zhao’s statement, the process of apprehension, identification records of the scene and the stolen vehicle, forensic photographs, appraisal conclusion letter, notification, list of seized and returned items, criminal judgment and release certificates, household registration certificates, and other evidence. It is recommended that the two defendants be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from six months to one year and six months. Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Ceng and Li had no objection to the facts, evidence, or charges and pleaded guilty and showed remorse in court.", "label": {"Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone charges that between July and September 2012, the defendants Zhang and Zhou, after prior discussion, first had Zhang search for unlocked electric bicycles within the Jin Xiu Decoration City of a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone. Zhang would then notify Zhou to ride away with the electric bicycle, resulting in the theft of three electric bicycles with a total value of RMB 3772.43. The specifics are as follows:\n\n1. One day in early July 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked AIMA electric bicycle parked by Yuan (female, born on November 10, 1970, the victim in this case) in the parking area in front of the Jin Xiu Cigarette and Alcohol Supermarket within the Jin Xiu Decoration City. Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1485.05.\n\n2. One day in mid to late August 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked Luyuan electric bicycle at the stairway entrance on the west side of the Jin Xiu Decoration City, parked by Pan (male, born on December 29, 1959, the victim in this case). Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1274.\n\n3. On September 30, 2012, defendant Zhang found an unlocked Incalcu electric bicycle parked in the passageway in front of the Shan Hua Carpet store within the Jin Xiu Decoration City, belonging to Chen (male, born on September 22, 1966, the victim in this case). Zhang then called defendant Zhou to have the bicycle ridden away. According to the price appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at RMB 1013.38.\n\nAfter the incident, defendants Zhang and Zhou returned the stolen money; defendant Zhou assisted the police in apprehending Zhang after being caught. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Zhou during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen, Pan, and Yuan, testimonies from witnesses Jiang and Han, identification records, the criminal judgment, release certificates, receipts, a price appraisal conclusion, and the case investigation process, which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on February 25, 2016, at around 18:00, defendants Zhou and Tan, after planning, prepared items such as wigs, glasses, gloves, masks, hats, and handcuffs. They went to a section of road in front of the entrance No. 5 of the International Exhibition Center of SM Plaza in Fupu Community, Luoshan Street, in a certain city to meet victim Wang, who was about to drive away. Defendant Tan grabbed victim Wang by the neck, and together with defendant Zhou, forcibly pulled victim Wang from the driver's seat to the back seat. Defendant Zhou drove the car and robbed victim Wang of a China Construction Bank card, withdrawing 20,000 RMB in cash from the card. They also caused multiple contusions and abrasions to victim Wang's body. Subsequently, the two defendants tied up victim Wang in the car and fled the scene. According to an assessment, the injuries to victim Wang’s right forehead, facial area, nose, and neck were classified as minor injuries. On March 18 and 25, 2016, defendants Zhou and Tan were arrested and brought to justice one after the other. After the incident, the family of defendant Zhou voluntarily returned 10,000 RMB of the illegal gains on his behalf to victim Wang. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Tan during the trial, and are supported by victim Wang's statement, the list of collected evidence, bank transaction records, surveillance screenshots, restitution list, photos of injuries, the police's account of the arrest and case resolution, defendants' identity information, criminal records, criminal judgments, criminal rulings, proof of release upon completion of sentence, detention certificates, identification records and explanations, on-site inspection records, extraction of traces, physical evidence registration forms, site plans, on-site photos, appraisal report by the Forensic Identification Office of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhou and Tan.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that the defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang were all security personnel from the Jianghan Road Pedestrian Street Management Committee in a certain district of this city. At around 21:00 on April 22, 2014, defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang were rectifying the illegal road occupation construction in front of a Cabbeen franchise store located on Jianghan Road Pedestrian Street in a certain district of the city when they had an argument with the victim Dong, who was setting up scaffolding at the above location. During this time, defendant Ye tried to slap victim Dong in the face. Dong evaded and ran towards Exit D of Jianghan Road Subway Station. Defendants Ye, Hu, Zhang, and others then collectively chased the victim into Jianghan Road Subway Station in the same district. Defendants Ye and Hu jointly assaulted the victim with fists and kicks. Subsequently, Zhang and Hu each grabbed one of the victim's arms, while Ye struck the victim's chest with his knee, resulting in injuries to Dong. Forensic identification determined that victim Dong suffered fractures of the 4th and 5th ribs on the left side, with the injuries classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, on receiving an oral summons from the public security authorities, defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the police on May 8 of the same year. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, Ye, Hu, and Zhang reached a civil settlement with victim Dong, compensating him jointly for economic losses totalling 40,000 RMB due to the injuries (which has been paid). Victim Dong voluntarily waived the right to pursue civil liability against the said defendants and expressed understanding towards defendants Ye, Hu, and Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the letter of understanding, basic information of the permanent population, query records from the National Criminal Information Resource Database, documents regarding the arrest and case-solving process from the public security authorities, witness testimonies from Cheng Moumou, Wei Moumou, Wu Moumou, Dong A, Yang Moumou, and Feng Moumou, the victim Dong's statement, and the forensic identification opinion of the victim's injuries, which are sufficient to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that from October 2016 to December 24th, Zhou (handled in a separate case) and the defendants Zhang and Lu, for the purpose of profit, set up two yellow \"Xiaoyu\" gaming machines in a wonton shop rented by Zhang next to the Experimental Primary School in Batandu Town, Binhai County. One machine was jointly purchased by defendants Lu and Zhang, and the other by defendant Zhang and Zhou. Each \"Xiaoyu\" gaming machine had two basic units that could independently be operated by one person each, for gambling purposes. They then allowed Lin, Zhang, Luo, and Chen (all minors) to gamble. According to the Public Security Police Brigade of Yancheng City Public Security Bureau, these two \"Xiaoyu\" machines were identified as electronic gaming devices with gambling functions. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Lu voluntarily surrendered to the Binhai County Public Security Bureau on December 24th, 2016, and June 5th, 2017, respectively, and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The Binhai County Public Security Bureau lawfully seized the two \"Xiaoyu\" machines and 72 yuan from inside the machines. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Lu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin, Zhang, Luo, and Chen, as well as evidence provided by the Binhai County Public Security Bureau, including household registration certificates, case development records, situation explanations, on-site photos, on-site inspection records, evidence preservation lists, special receipt for temporarily withheld funds, and the Determination of Gambling Function of Electronic Gaming Facilities and Equipment No. 97 [2016] issued by the Public Security Police Brigade of Yancheng City Public Security Bureau. This evidence is sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it has been found that: On July 20, 2016, at around 20:00, the defendants Yin and Zhu, under the influence of alcohol, got into a dispute with stall owner Li over the purchase of jelly at the night market street on Weiye Road, Mingzhu Industrial Park, Conghua District, a certain city in a certain province. Taking advantage of their inebriated state, defendants Yin and Zhu overturned the table belonging to Li and Sun, who had come to mediate the dispute. Subsequently, defendant Yin used a fruit knife, and Zhu resorted to punching and kicking, thereby injuring Sun and Li. According to a forensic assessment, Sun's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while Li sustained slight injuries. Further investigation revealed that, due to the aforementioned provocative behavior, defendants Yin and Zhu were apprehended by the public security authorities on July 20, 2016. They were then administratively detained for fifteen days (from July 21, 2016, to August 5, 2016) and were criminally detained for this case on July 30, 2016, and arrested on August 24 of the same year. Hence, the actual administrative detention period for the defendants related to this case was 9 days, which should be deducted from their prison term. After the incident, the defendants' families provided some compensation to the victims, thereby obtaining the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Yin and Zhu during the trial. They were corroborated by statements from victims Sun and Li provided by the public prosecutor in court, verified and authenticated by the court, testimonies from witnesses Sun Yi, Li Bing, Lei Yi, and Cao, the defendants Yin and Zhu's confessions and site identifications, photographs of the crime tools and scenes, the victims' identification records and photos recognizing the defendants Yin and Zhu, witness Li Bing and Sun Yi's identification records and photos recognizing defendant Yin, defendant Yin's identificat", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: From May 5 to May 8, 2013, defendants Nie and Tan, together with others, organized gambling gatherings in a certain residential area in this city, profiting over 7,000 RMB from rake-offs. From the end of March to April 9, 2013, defendant Nie, along with others, organized gambling gatherings in a certain residential area and other locations in this city, and hired Wang, Zhu, Liang, Tian, and others (who have all been sentenced) to work in the casino. During this period, they earned approximately over 100,000 RMB from rake-offs. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution agency read out and presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence, written evidence, recognition records, inspection records, and the confessions of the two defendants in court.", "label": {"Nie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: 1. On November 10, 2014, at approximately 1 PM, defendants Li and Wang stole a mobile phone worth 380.97 yuan from the victim Liu near the \"Yonghui Supermarket\" at the Salt Avenue in Renhuai City. The phone has been recovered and returned to the owner. 2. On November 10, 2014, at approximately 2 PM, defendants Li, Wang, and Huang stole an Apple brand mobile phone worth 1204.66 yuan from the victim Chen near the \"Xianghe Restaurant\" at the Avenue in Renhuai City. The phone has been recovered and returned to the owner. These facts are confirmed by evidence such as case registration forms, household registration certificates, victim statements, identification records, and appraisal conclusions. The three defendants raised no objections during the trial, and these facts are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that in the early morning of August 22, 2013, at Good Song KTV in Zhangdian District, Zibo City, the defendants Luan and Liu had a dispute with Fang and Zhao over trivial matters, which led to a physical altercation between the parties. Defendants Luan and Liu injured Fang's head and left ear and injured Zhao's left hand. According to the assessment, Fang's injuries constituted minor injuries, and Zhao's injuries constituted slight injuries. After the incident, defendants Luan and Liu compensated the victims Fang and Zhao for their economic losses and obtained their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Luan and Liu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by evidence including the apprehension materials issued by the Xingxue Street Police Station of the Zhangdian Public Security Sub-bureau, the statements of victims Fang and Zhao, the testimonies of witnesses Li, Zheng, Cao, Lü, and Han, injury assessment reports, medical records, compensation agreement, and letter of understanding, along with the confessions and identification of defendants Luan and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Luan": [], "Liu": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 4 a.m. on April 9, 2015, the defendant Zheng, after buying cigarettes at the \"Fuxing\" tobacco and alcohol store located at the Lianyu intersection, Lianyu Community, Qingyang Street, in a certain city, intended to join the card game of the victim, Xu, and others in the store. Feeling displeased by Xu's mocking him for having no money, Zheng started an argument with Xu and was the first to physically assault Xu. Seeing this, Zheng’s friend, the defendant Huang, stepped in to help, and both defendants took part in beating the victim, Xu, using bottles and other tools, causing injuries to Xu's nose and other areas. Forensic examination determined that the injury to Xu's nose constituted minor injury, level two. On April 17, 2015, the defendant Zheng was apprehended by the police at a tobacco and alcohol store under the \"Haifeng\" hotel in Qinghua Community, Qingyang Street, in the city. On May 4, the defendant Huang voluntarily turned himself in to the city's public security bureau. After the incident, the defendant Zheng compensated the victim Xu with 55,000 RMB, and Xu expressed forgiveness for the actions of the two defendants. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zheng and Huang during the trial and are sufficiently corroborated by the victim Xu's statement, testimony from witness Lin, identification records, photos and explanations of the identifications, forensic medical injury assessment, medical diagnosis and records, the mediation agreement and receipt, household registration information, site surveillance video, and documents issued by the public security organs, including the certificate of the voluntary surrender, details of the arrest and case resolution, and work explanations.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 9 a.m. on November 5, 2013, the defendants Li and Wang went to the entrance of No. 92, Hongxiang Road, Oriental Industrial Zone, Louqiao Subdistrict, Ouhai District, a certain city. Seeing a mobile phone in the pocket of the victim Hu's jacket, they used a pair of tweezers to steal an Apple 4S phone from Hu. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Wang during the trial. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the statement of the victim Hu, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Chi, the identification record and photos, the list of seized items and photos, the explanation of the seizure process, surveillance video discs, an explanatory note, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release upon completion of sentence, the details of the arrest, identification documents, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that in May 2020, defendants Ban and Sha jointly sold heroin to Ke for RMB 30, RMB 10, and RMB 20 on three occasions at a shack by the roadside of the nut base in a certain county. On June 30, 2020, at about 16:00, defendants Ban and Sha jointly sold heroin to Sha for RMB 20 at the same location. On June 30, 2020, at around 22:00, defendant Sha was arrested at the nut base in a certain county. The police seized RMB 100 from the right pocket of Sha's pants, a rose gold OPPO touchscreen phone from the left side of the bed in the shack by the roadside of the nut base, and 8 packets of heroin wrapped in a black plastic bag from a red cigarette box on the right side of the bed in the shack. The heroin weighed a total of 1.38 grams. On July 21, 2020, at about 10:00, defendant Ban was arrested at his home in a certain county. The evidence establishing the above facts includes physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses of the defendants, expert opinions, identification records, and investigation records.", "label": {"Ban": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charges: On the evening of June 13, 2017, the defendants Sun, Gong, Liu, Fang, and Xu, in an attempt to teach the victim Bao a lesson, lured the victim Bao to Room 8313 of ** Hotel in Donghu Street, Yuhang District, in a certain city. There, they punched and kicked him, and robbed him of one iPhone 6 on the spot and transferred 2,058.31 yuan from his Alipay account. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 1,400 yuan. After the incident, the iPhone was recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The evidence supporting the charges includes documentary evidence such as household registration certificates; hotel surveillance videos; victim statements; price appraisals; records of seizure and identification; confessions and defenses of the defendants, among others.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that around 23:00 on May 10, 2013, Zhao Moujia contacted the defendant Zhang for help because her boyfriend Zhao Mouyi was slapped by Wang. The defendant Zhang gathered the defendants Shao and Li Moumou, Wu Mou (already sentenced), and others, and rushed to the entrance of Zhengtai Hotel near the front gate of the zoo on Dongjie, Xijianhe, in a certain district of a certain city. They attacked the victim Wang with machetes, wooden sticks, and bricks, causing multiple cut wounds on his head with a total scar length of 46.6 cm, and a cut wound on his neck with a scar length of 8.2 cm. According to the forensic assessment of the certain district public security judicial identification center of the city, Wang's injuries constituted minor injuries. On January 25, 2015, the defendant Zhang compensated the victim Wang with 30,000 yuan; on October 27, 2019, Shao's family compensated the victim Wang with 12,000 yuan and obtained his forgiveness. On October 27, 2019, the defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered to the case after a phone summons by the public security organ; on January 7, 2020, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered after a phone summons by the public security organ. The aforementioned facts have no objection raised by the defendants Shao and Zhang during the court trial, and are also confirmed by evidence including the case registration form, investigation report, process of surrender, process of capture, explanatory notes, and appraisal documents issued by the Xinghualing Branch Bureau of the city public security bureau; the interrogation transcript, letter of forgiveness, and receipt from the victim Wang; testimonies and identification transcripts of witnesses Wu Mou, Dong, Zhao Moujia, Zhang Moujia, Zhao Mouyi, Tian, and Fan; as well as the defendants Shao and Zhang's household registration certificates and confessions, which are sufficient to determine the case.", "label": {"Shao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at approximately 23:20 on May 27, 2013, in front of Jiahui Pharmacy at the night market in Shenze County, the defendant Li had a dispute with taxi driver Wang Moumou and called Zhao and others to beat Wang Moumou. The defendant Zhao used a knife he was carrying to stab Wang Moumou in the chest. According to the Shenze Judicial Forensic Identification Center, Wang Moumou's injuries were classified as minor. On June 27, 2013, the families of defendants Zhao and Li compensated the victim Wang Moumou a total of 105,000 yuan for various expenses and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Wang Moumou's statement; testimonies from witnesses Zhang A, Zhang B, Zhang C, Zhang D, Cao Moumou, Chen Moumou, Li A, and Li B; the process of bringing the case to court; photos of physical evidence; inspection records and photos; appraisal report; mediation agreement; and inquiry records; household registration certificates, among other evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3 a.m. on May 4, 2017, defendants Du and Ji entered the \"Traffic Light Grocery\" located at No. 63, Jinguang Road, in a certain town of a certain district of a certain city, and stole 49 cartons and 6 packs of cigarettes, along with 6 bottles of Wuliangye liquor. According to the price certification center of a certain district of a certain city, the wholesale market value of the stolen cigarettes and Wuliangye liquor on the day of the incident was RMB 16,620. Further investigation by this court found that after the incident, the public security organ recovered 6 cartons and 11 packs of the stolen cigarettes and 2 bottles of the stolen Wuliangye liquor. They also seized a \"vivox9\" mobile phone used in the crime, and returned the recovered Wuliangye liquor and cigarettes to the victim. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the trial. The evidence includes the case registration form, basic information of permanent residents, the process by which they were brought to justice, this court's criminal judgment (2011) No. 16-2 and (2016) Chuan 1111 No. 18, information on the release of criminals from Sichuan Province Jinjiang Prison, release certificates (stubs), mobile phone transaction voucher photos, customer ledger, statements, sales slips of famous liquor from the Agricultural Reclamation, Skynet surveillance videos and screenshots, urine sample collection records, on-site testing reports, urine test photos, identification of surveillance video screenshots, surveillance video screenshots, crime scene and stolen goods photos, records and photos of the crime scene and sales site identification, videos, seizure list, return list, photos of the stolen Wuliangye liquor and cigarettes, photos of the mobile phone information of Ji and Wang1, on-site inspection transcripts, location maps, site plan diagrams, scene photos, price valuation conclusion reports No. [2017] 029 and 032 from the price certification center of a certain district of a certain city, statements from victims Zhu and Wang2, testimonies and identification records from witnesses Shi and Wang1, as well as the confessions, defenses, identification records, and interrogation videos of defendants Du and Ji, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 2 a.m. on September 11, 2014, in the Fuyuan Tomato Factory in Langshan Town, Linhe District, a dispute occurred between Zhao, the raw material purchasing team leader of the tomato factory, and the victim, Yang. Defendant Wang, on the south side of the factory's reception room, punched Yang and kneeled on Yang’s abdomen. Subsequently, Wang pushed Yang into the reception room, where, together with defendant Ba, they punched and kicked Yang, resulting in multiple rib fractures on both sides. According to the assessment, Yang's injuries were classified as Level 2 minor injuries. After the incident, Wang and Ba voluntarily surrendered themselves, under the guidance of officer Wang A from the factory's police unit. The Fuyuan Tomato Factory in Langshan Town, Linhe District compensated the victim for medical expenses totaling 8,000 yuan.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ba": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between August 8 and 12, 2013, the defendants Yuan and Hu, along with Mao, Zhou, and Hu A (all of whom have been sentenced) organized gambling activities involving bullfighting at Louyan Farm in Shangtian Town, in this city. During these activities, they involved Lin, Hu B, Chen, and others, and extracted more than 113,000 yuan in fees from the gambling operations. During this period, defendant Yuan illegally profited over 34,000 yuan. Additionally, Yuan provided 70,000 yuan in gambling funds to participants at high interest rates, earning over 1,600 yuan in interest. From August 8 to 15, 2013, defendant Hu assisted in collecting the fees and received a commission of over 1,800 yuan. On January 24, 2014, defendant Hu, under the persuasion and accompaniment of defendant Yuan, turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. Furthermore, it was found that on the afternoon of November 18, 2013, defendant Yuan was arrested by the police on a bus at the Jinshan toll station on the Shenhai Expressway. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and Hu during the trial and were corroborated by confessions from co-defendants Mao, Zhou, and Hu A, testimony from witnesses Fan, Chen, Dai, and Hu B, identification records, inspection records, criminal judgment and release certificates, administrative penalty decisions, specialized receipts for temporarily seized items, population information, and account of the arrest, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: Defendant Yuan is the director of Sunshine Bilingual Kindergarten in a certain village, town, county. In 2015, Defendant Yuan hired Defendant Cui to drive and transport kindergarten students. At around 7 a.m. on August 31, 2016, Defendant Cui was driving minivan with license plate Ji D××××× in front of Sunshine Bilingual Kindergarten in a certain village, town, county to transport students and was caught by the police. The minivan was authorized to carry 8 passengers, but actually carried 18, constituting serious overloading. It was further found that after the incident, Defendants Yuan and Cui voluntarily surrendered themselves. The defendants raised no objections to these facts during the court hearing, and the testimonies of witnesses Wu and Liu, photos of the vehicle transporting students, household registration certificates, as well as the confessions of Defendants Yuan and Cui provide sufficient evidence for these facts.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: On June 27, 2015, at around 10:00 PM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to No. 64, Qiaonan New Village, a village in a certain town in a certain district of Ningbo City, and stole a Philips brand electric scooter parked by He (worth 1,600 yuan). They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On July 30th of the same year, at around 4:00 AM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to No. 117, Prosperity Road, a certain town in a certain district, in front of Dejie Electric Appliance Store, and stole a set of batteries from an electric scooter parked by Liu. Afterwards, they went to the entrance of No. 62, Prosperity Road, and stole a set of batteries from a tricycle parked by Jiang (worth 680 yuan). They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On August 2nd of the same year, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Ding and Wu went to Thirteen Holes Bridge beside Hushan Village, a certain town in a certain district, and stole a set of batteries from an electric scooter parked by Shi. They later sold the stolen goods and used the proceeds. On the evening of August 20th of the same year, defendant Wu was arrested in a village in a certain town in a certain district. At around 4:00 PM on September 30th of the same year, defendant Ding was arrested in a village in a certain town in a certain district. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ding and Wu during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims He, Liu, Jiang, and Shi, identification records, pointing out records, surveillance video, the appraisal opinion from the Ningbo City Price Certification Center, the administrative penalty decision by the Yinzhou Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau, the arrest process, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ding": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that during February 2016, the defendants Wei and Shi colluded to open a casino at No. 33, Zhongliao District, a village in Jinjing Town of a certain city, providing gambling tools \"stickers\" for gatherings to gamble, and profiting from it. During this period, Shi B (handled in a separate case), Wei's husband, knowingly assisted the defendant Wei with transporting her to and from the casino. On February 25, 2016, the police uncovered this casino at the mentioned location and caught the defendants Wei, Shi B, and gamblers Shi 2, Shi 1, Shi A, among others, red-handed. At the scene, they seized gambling funds amounting to 21,950 RMB, one set of gambling tools \"stickers\", and three dice. Investigation revealed that more than twenty individuals were participating in gambling at the casino. On March 22, 2016, defendant Shi was apprehended by the police at the \"Xiangyun\" tea shop on Xiabing Street of Xiabing Village, Jinjing Town, in a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Shi and Wei during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Shi 1, Shi 2, Shi 3, Shi 4, Shi 5, Shi 6, Shi 7, Shi 8, and Xu, as well as by the decision on evidence preservation, the item seizure list, the administrative penalty decision notice, the identification records and photos of identified persons, household registration information, the confession of co-defendant Shi B, and the documentation of arrest and case-solving by law enforcement agencies, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District in a certain city charged that from March 2015 to May 4, 2016, the defendants Wang and Li, after prior discussion, placed a Fire Butterfly brand gaming machine in a small shop operated by Wang next to the \"Yongjin Church\" in Keyan Street, Keqiao District, a certain city, to attract people for gambling. By the time it was discovered by the public security authorities on May 4, 2016, they had gained illegal profits totaling over 6,400 yuan, and the gaming machine involved in the case was seized. According to the appraisal, the gaming machine involved in the case was a gambling machine. It was also found that when the public security authorities uncovered the case, they additionally seized 400 yuan of illegal gains on the spot. After the incident, Wang and Li each returned 3,000 yuan in cash to the public security authorities. After being arrested, both defendants truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court proceedings, the defendants Wang and Li did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which were further substantiated by evidence, including photos of the gaming machine involved, the seizure decision, seizure list, cash payment slips, accounts of the arrest process by police officers from the former Keqiao District Public Security Bureau and Yuecheng District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, as well as the testimonies and identification records of Chen and Tang, and the identification opinion of electronic gaming facilities and equipment, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found: On the evening of July 29, 2013, at around 9 PM, defendant Zhu and others were dining with the victim Zheng and others at Junhai Barbecue Restaurant, located on the south side of Peace Hotel in Dianbu Town, a certain county. During their meal, due to a trivial matter, defendant Zhu developed a dislike for Zheng and called Liu, requesting him to bring others to teach Zheng a lesson. Subsequently, defendant Liu and others arrived at Zhao's barbecue stall and assaulted Zheng and others who were eating. On August 2, 2013, the victim Zheng was diagnosed with traumatic spleen rupture at Hefei Second People's Hospital and later underwent surgery to have the spleen removed. According to the forensic assessment from a certain county, Zheng's injuries were classified as second-degree serious injury. It was further found that on March 31, 2014, Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. After the incident, both defendants compensated the victim with 230,000 yuan for economic losses and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial proceedings. Additionally, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, forensic assessment of the degree of human injuries, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the compensation and forgiveness agreement, and household registration certificates serve as evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was established that starting from July 22, 2015, defendants Qiao and Ruan, under the instruction of Zhang, the manager of Lihui Tiantong Company (handled in another case), demanded repayment of debts from victim Li Mouyi by following him closely for 24 hours and moved into Li Mouyi's residence at Room 705, Building B18, Yahuju, Kaiyin Xincheng, Torch Development Zone, a certain city. On the evening of September 6 of the same year, due to Li Mouyi's prolonged failure to repay, Qiao informed Li Mouyi he was not allowed to leave for three days and proceeded to assault him, confiscating his cellphone and keys. During this period, Ruan was present with Qiao and Li Mouyi in the aforementioned Room 705. Subsequently, Li Mouyi secretly threw several SOS notes from his room's window downstairs. On the morning of September 8, taking advantage of Qiao and Ruan being asleep, Li Mouyi managed to escape and requested assistance from the community security to call the police. Shortly afterward, the police apprehended Qiao and Ruan in the said Room 705. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Qiao and Ruan during the trial, and corroborated by confessions and identification records from Qiao and Ruan, statements and identification records from victim Li Mouyi, witness testimonies and identification records from Zhang, Hu, Mo, Li Moujia, Wang Moujia, Wei, Xie Moujia, Hao, Wang Mouyi, Xie Mouyi, and Chen, site inspection records and photographs, arrest process, evidence acceptance lists, notes, WeChat chat screenshots, repayment receipts, inventory of seized items, and agreements, injury photos, call and message records, bank statements, household registration information, administrative penalty decision (Shangong Xingfa Juezi [2013] No. 10487), letter of understanding, case handling explanation, and mobile phone recordings, providing ample evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Qiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Ruan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that Liang and Yu repeatedly stole others' mountain bikes from the second-floor parking area at a certain location on Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District: 1. One day in May 2013, Liang and Yu stole a \"SUMMA\" brand mountain bike belonging to Liang, which was parked there. The mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 810 RMB. 2. One day in August 2013, Liang and Yu stole a \"ONOX\" brand mountain bike and a white mountain bike belonging to Liu Taoli, which were parked there. The \"ONOX\" brand mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 630 RMB. 3. On February 21, 2014, Liang and Yu stole a \"OSIMA\" brand mountain bike belonging to Yang Cai, and a red and white framed mountain bike belonging to Chen Mei, which were parked there. The \"OSIMA\" brand mountain bike involved in the case was appraised at a value of 680 RMB. On March 24, 2014, Yu voluntarily confessed to the crime of stealing others' bicycles with Liang when being questioned due to suspicious behavior. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Yu during the court hearing and are confirmed by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, investigation, inspection, identification, and investigation experiment records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "In September 2015, the People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that the defendant, Tian, harbored resentment upon hearing that the victim, Hu, had reported violations regarding his contracted project and thus planned revenge. He called and instructed the defendant, Liu, to vandalize the silver-gray Range Rover with the license plate number starting with \"E\" driven by Hu. In the early hours of September 21 of the same year, at 1 a.m., Liu spotted the vehicle in front of the \"Asia Hotel\" in a town in the county. He then rode a motorcycle and led \"Ha'er\" (a nickname, identity unknown) to smash multiple parts of Hu's Range Rover with a machete, including the two front headlights and the windshield. According to the local pricing department's appraisal, the car sustained damages worth 39,460 yuan. On January 12, 2016, the defendant, Tian, voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution presented evidence to the court in the form of eight physical evidence photos, documentary evidence of compensation for the victim's losses, the household registration information of the two defendants, a description of their arrest, an on-site inspection report, a pricing appraisal opinion, audiovisual material on a disc, witness testimony from a witness named Huang, a statement from the victim, Hu, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants, Liu and Tian.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of May 28, 2014, Shi, because his girlfriend Xiao did not return while singing at Candy Tree KTV on Dongfeng Road, Daye City, with Hou Jia, Hou Wu, Hou Ding, and others, asked defendants Liu and Feng and others to rush to the location to find his girlfriend. Shi argued with the others on the grounds that Hou Ding, Hou Wu, and others made his girlfriend sing too late, which led to a quarrel and eventually a mutual fight. Defendant Feng punched and kicked Hou Ding and Hou Wu, while defendant Liu injured Hou Wu and Hou Ding with a machete. According to the forensic appraisal, Hou Ding suffered a Grade 1 minor injury, and Hou Wu suffered a Grade 2 minor injury. After the incident, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal acts; defendants Liu and Feng jointly compensated the victim Hou Ding for economic losses of 128,000 yuan, and defendant Feng compensated Hou Wu for economic losses of 20,000 yuan, obtaining the victims' understanding.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Feng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 19:00 on May 12, 2014, defendants Mo and Peng went to the entrance of the China Merchants Bank on Wenxin Five Road in the Coastal City area of Nanshan District, a certain city. Seeing that a Simplon-brand mountain bike belonging to the victim, Ma, was parked there, Peng served as a lookout and support while Mo went forward and used pliers to cut the bike lock to steal the bike. The two were captured as they were preparing to flee the scene on the bicycle. The aforementioned bicycle and the tools used in the crime were seized on the spot. According to an appraisal, the stolen bicycle was valued at 5,855 RMB. The prosecution submitted Sentencing Recommendation No. 1188 (2014) from the Shenzhen Southern Procuratorate to the court, suggesting that defendant Peng, classified as a repeat offender, be sentenced to nine months to one year in prison and fined; for defendant Mo, a sentence of less than eleven months in prison or detention was suggested, along with a fine. The facts of the crime alleged by the prosecution were not refuted by defendants Mo and Peng during the court hearing, and were supported by the statements of the victim Ma; testimonies of witnesses Wen and Huang; photos of the bicycle and pliers involved, the seizure order, inventory of seized items, return receipt, arrest proceedings, recovery of stolen goods, explanation of prior offenses, defendants' identification information, criminal judgment, and proof of release after serving a sentence; price appraisal opinion; site investigation records and photographs; identification records involving Wen X, Huang A, Mo, and Peng; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Mo and Peng, all of which were verified as true evidence, sufficient to establish guilt.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at approximately 11:00 PM on September 1, 2013, defendants Wang and Qiu, along with Cheng and Zheng (both of whom have been sentenced) and others, after drinking alcohol, caused disturbances without reason to Zhao and Shen near the east gate of Mengshan Shopping Mall in Jiaxiang County. They were later driven away by patrolling police officers. After the police left, defendants Wang and Qiu, under the rallying of Cheng A, returned and assaulted Zhao and Shen. During the assault, Zheng injured Zhao's head with a brick. Forensic examination determined that Zhao's epidural hematoma on the left occipital region was categorized as minor injury level one, and the skull fracture as minor injury level two. After the incident, defendants Wang and Qiu compensated the victim Zhao for economic losses. These facts were undisputed by defendants Wang and Qiu during the trial and were substantiated by documentary evidence such as settlement agr", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 8:00 PM on September 1, 2014, defendants Tan and Luo went to the entrance of China Minsheng Bank at No. 1 Anji Avenue, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city, and sold a small package of K powder (net weight 0.4 grams) to Lin for 300 yuan, where they were caught on the spot by public security personnel. Upon assessment, the said drug was confirmed to be ketamine. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to support this accusation, and believes that defendants Tan and Luo sold 0.4 grams of ketamine, and their actions have violated article x, clause four of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, the evidence is sufficient, and both defendants should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Defendants Tan and Luo have no objections to the criminal facts and charges in the indictment. The defense argues that defendant Luo has a good attitude towards admitting guilt, sold a small amount of drugs, is a minor participant, and poses minimal social harm, recommending a lenient sentence. Upon examination, it was found that at around 8:00 PM on September 1, 2014, defendants Tan and Luo went to the entrance of China Minsheng Bank at No. 1 Anji Avenue, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city, and sold a small package of ketamine (commonly known as \"K powder\"), with a net weight of 0.4 grams, to Lin for 300 yuan. After the transaction was completed, the three of them were caught on the spot by public security personnel. The police seized 300 yuan of drug money from Tan and a small package of ketamine (net weight 0.4 grams) from Lin. These facts, which defendants Tan and Luo also do not dispute during the court hearing, along with the criminal case registry, details of arrest, household registration proof, list of seized items, testimony from witness Lin, confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Luo, drug testing and identification report, photos of drug weighing, site identification record and photos, extraction record, and other evidence, are sufficient to ascertain.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on April 3, 2015, Zheng was lured by \"Xiao Wu\" (handled in a separate case) under the pretense of job introduction to a pyramid scheme den located in Room D601, Building A, Jinxia Huayuan, a town in Nan'an City. Zheng was unlawfully detained there, with defendants Zhou, Qiu, Yang, and Li responsible for guarding him until the police uncovered the den on April 19, 2015, and rescued Zheng. Among the defendants, Lu acted as the caretaker, responsible for arranging meals and accommodation within the pyramid scheme den, keeping keys and mobile phones, and monitoring communications. Zhou, arranged by \"Director Li\" (handled in a separate case), was assigned as Zheng's mentor, fully responsible for his custody. Defendants Qiu, Yang, and Li were responsible for guarding Zheng in Zhou's absence. After the incident, the police lawfully seized a key from defendant Lu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lu, Zhou, Qiu, Yang, and Li during the court hearing and were confirmed by the statements of victim Zheng, witness testimonies from Yu, Pan, Wu, and Zhang, identification records and photos, seizure lists, household registration certificates, and the account of the apprehension, all constituting sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Detention"], "Yang": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution, at approximately 11 p.m. on October 30, 2014, the defendants Lan and He, along with Chen, were apprehended on the spot by the public security authorities while conducting a drug transaction in room 203 of the Gongxiao Hotel, Yulin City. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence to prove the criminal facts charged in the indictment.", "label": {"Lan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. At around 3 a.m. on September 19, 2014, the defendant Yu, in collaboration with others, stole a white Kymco brand Fengli 110 scooter belonging to the victim, Liu Jia, from the entrance of Causeway Bay KTV on Huaihai Road in a certain city. The stolen scooter was appraised at a value of 4,070 RMB. 2. On November 14, 2014, the defendant Yu, along with the defendant Yao, went to the entrance of the Hengyue Hotel on Dama Road in a certain city. Using means of having the defendant Yao act as a lookout, the defendant Yu executed the theft and stole a white Yamaha ZY125T-6 scooter belonging to the victim, Liu Yi. The stolen scooter was appraised at a value of 7,020 RMB. On November 14, 2014, the defendants Yu and Yao were apprehended by the police and brought to justice.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In May 2013, the defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng, and others, without the knowledge of the village committee and villagers of a certain village in a certain town of Xichuan County, sold 1.9 acres of land intended for the construction of the village office to developer Wang for 530,000 yuan to build houses. On January 25, 2016, the defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng, and others turned themselves in to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Wang, Wu, Zheng during the court trial, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Fan, Wang, and others, as well as documentary evidence such as the land transfer agreement, account of surrender, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of December 12, 2013, the defendants Wu and Wang went to a village in a certain town of a certain city and stole a silver-white Supaiqi electric tricycle belonging to the victim Yu. Subsequently, defendant Wu sold it to Chen for 1,450 yuan. According to a price appraisal, the value of the electric tricycle at the time of theft was 2,660 yuan. 2. In the early morning of December 18, 2013, the defendants Wu and Wang went to a village in a certain town of a certain city and stole four electric vehicles belonging to the victim Liang, namely one Daan brand electric tricycle, one Xiaoniao brand electric bicycle, one Huaxun brand electric bicycle, and one Xinri brand electric bicycle. According to a price appraisal, the value of the four electric vehicles at the time of theft was 5,864 yuan. For the criminal facts charged above, the prosecution has provided evidence such as a list of seized items returned, recognition records, price appraisal opinions, household registration certificates, apprehension process explanations, case handling descriptions, witness testimonies, victim statements, and defendant confessions.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges that, at approximately 22:00 on August 23, 2013, the defendants Xu and Du, after conferring, carried out a plan where defendant Xu invited Xu Moumou and his wife, Guo, to dinner. Meanwhile, defendant Du took the opportunity to commit theft at Xu Moumou's home in a certain village of a town in Funing County, stealing 10,600 RMB. After the incident, defendants Xu and Du voluntarily surrendered to the Funing County Public Security Bureau on August 28, 2013, and truthfully confessed their criminal conduct. Defendants Xu and Du have returned the stolen 10,600 RMB. The aforementioned facts are not contested by defendants Xu and Du during the court hearing, and they are corroborated by evidence such as the victim Guo's statement, household registration certificates issued by the Funing County Public Security Bureau, inspection records, receipts, and letters of understanding, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: In the early morning of March 15, 2016, defendants Han and Huang, after prior consultation, took a van driven by defendant Han (bearing a fake license plate) to a construction site at Jingrui Wangfu in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city. They climbed the fence to enter the site and used tools they had brought to saw off the cables placed on the site. They stole 35 meters of cable with a specification of 70 square millimeters, 120 meters of cable with a specification of 35 square millimeters, and 20 meters of cable with a specification of 4 square millimeters. The two defendants also broke the wall panels of a temporary warehouse on site and stole 1 welding machine, 1 cutting machine, and 5 electric hammers from the warehouse (all the aforementioned stolen items are valued at 11,330.5 yuan). Afterwards, they loaded the items and fled the scene. The next day, the two defendants stripped the stolen cables and sold them near Century Avenue in Jiangdong District of a certain city to a person named He, obtaining more than 8,000 yuan in illicit gains. On April 24 of the same year, defendant Han was arrested by the police at a temporary residence located at No. 8 Lao Xia's house in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district in a certain city. On the same day, defendant Huang was arrested by the police at a temporary residence in a certain village of a certain town in a certain district in a certain city. The stolen welding machine and cutting machine have been recovered and returned to the victim. The two defendants additionally compensated the victim 12,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Han and Huang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses He and Ming, identification records and photos, cable invoices, delivery lists, extraction records and photos, seizure orders and lists, site identification records and photos, return lists, receipts, surveillance checkpoint platform photos, on-site inspection records, price appraisal report, arrest process, the defendants’ household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Between September and November 17, 2014, the defendants Liu and Yang, in their shared rented apartment at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community, Development Zone of a certain city, accommodated Ma on three occasions to use methamphetamine. In early November 2014, the defendant Liu, at his temporary residence at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community, Development Zone of a certain city, allowed Ma and others to use methamphetamine. On November 19, 2014, the defendant Liu was arrested by the police at No. 175, Room 20, Building 1, Xinghe Garden Community. On the same day, the defendant Yang was arrested by the police at the Yuxiang Internet Cafe in the Development Zone of the same city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Yang during the trial process, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Chen, and Lai, inspection and identification records, the rental agreement, administrative penalty decision, on-site test report opinion, and the record of the case, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination of the facts, it was found that:\n\n1. In late March 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of \"Yang\" to check into room 8203 at the Long An Ju Hotel in a certain district of a city, allowing defendant Fan to consume methamphetamine.\n\n2. In the early hours of April 13, 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of \"Li A\" to check into the De'er Hotel in Wuyi County, allowing defendant Fan to consume methamphetamine.\n\n3. On the evening of April 13, 2014, defendant Li used the identity card of \"Li A\" to check into the New Tianhe Grand Hotel in a certain city, had defendant Fan purchase methamphetamine worth 200 yuan, and allowed defendants Fan and Qiu B to consume methamphetamine.\n\n4. In late March and early April 2014, defendant Fan twice parked the Toyota Corolla car with plate number ga0958, which he rented, on the south side of Binjiang Road in a certain district of the city near the city's Eighth Middle School, and allowed defendant Li to consume methamphetamine inside the car.\n\nOn April 14, 2014, the public security authorities apprehended defendant Li in room 8309 of the New Tianhe Grand Hotel in a certain district of the city; on the same day, defendant Fan was apprehended in room 302 of the Ruby Hotel in a certain district of the city.\n\nFresh urine samples from Li, Fan, and Qiu B were collected and tested for drug content, all showing positive for methamphetamine.\n\nThese facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Fan during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Qiu B, Zhu, Liao, Zhou, Qiu A, Wang, Zhang, and Li A; the on-site test reports and photos; inspection records and photos; identification records and photos; a CD; transcript of administrative coercive measures notifications; decisions and lists of evidence preservation; photos of seized items; receipts and return lists; notifications for retrieving evidence; lists and accommodation registration forms; a car rental contract; a copy of the motor vehicle driver's license; the criminal judgment; release registration forms; administrative penalty decisions; compulsory isolation detoxification decisions; the account of the case; residency information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on June 16, 2015, at around 12:00, the defendants Liu and Chen, along with Yang, Chen, and Liu A (all dealt with in separate cases), drove to a certain village on a certain road in a certain district of a certain city. Under the pretense of buying a car and the payment of the guarantee money not being settled, they successively brought Zhang Yi, Wang, Zhang Jia, and Zhang Yi, Wang's van to the vicinity of Beiyuan Community in a certain district. They took the three individuals to a room on the fifteenth floor of an office building and detained them there. During this period, the defendants Liu, Chen, and others repeatedly beat Zhang Yi, Wang, and Zhang Jia, forcing them to repay the debt and the penalty for breach of contract. After Wang paid 20,000 yuan in cash, he was released at 19:00 on the same day. Zhang Jia was released after paying 1,500 yuan at around 23:00 the same day. Zhang Yi was released at around 1:00 the following morning. The injuries of Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and Wang were all classified as minor injuries.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that: 1. One early morning in early March 2014, the defendant Yan sneaked into Liu's \"Yi Zhi Mei\" beauty salon located at No. 10, Four South Ring Road, Bathou Village, Chengdong Street, of a certain city, and stole 275 RMB in cash and 7 packs of Yuan Su brand Yuan Peptide Repair Masks. According to the appraisal by the Price Verification Center of the city, the masks were valued at 154 RMB. 2. In the early morning of March 11, 2014, defendants Yan and He again entered the \"Yi Zhi Mei\" beauty salon by climbing through a window, and stole 7 packs of Yuan Su brand Yuan Peptide Repair Masks, 2 boxes of Meisu eye cream, 2 boxes of ecological water, 1 box of Ai Si Jiu cleansing foam, and 1 box of Ou Zi Mei Ya Eye Care Babysitter Eye Patches. According to the city’s Price Verification Center, these items were valued at 1167 RMB. 3. In the early morning of March 17, 2014, defendants Yan and He conspired to steal an iPhone 5S from Liu's house. They climbed through a window into Liu's \"Yi Zhi Mei\" beauty salon. Subsequently, He entered the second-floor bedroom and stole an iPhone 5S and an iPhone 5 from Liu's bedside table, along with two handbags. Finding no valuable items in the bags, they returned them to their original place. The next day, attempting to dispose of the stolen goods, Yan and He tried to reset the iPhone 5S but were unable to do so without the ID password. Defendant He even contacted Liu via text message to try to obtain the ID password. After the incident, the two stolen phones were recovered and returned to the victim, Liu. According to the city’s Price Verification Center, the phones were valued at 5925 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yan and He during the trial. The case is corroborated by the victim Liu's statement, residence certificate, list and photos of seized items, list of returned items, photos of text messages, query form from the Vast Information Investigation and Analysis System, capture records, explanatory notes, price appraisal reports, identification records, and site investigation records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Between 2016 and 2017, defendants Zhu and Wang, while serving as the investment promotion manager and investment director of the Investment Promotion Department at Jiakai City Group Commercial Asset Management Co., Ltd. in the Tangqi and Pingyao branches, colluded to use their positions, which involved facilitating project investments, for personal gain. They solicited or accepted kickbacks from several shop owners in the projects they managed by promising reduced rent, extending rent-free periods, and other benefits. Among them, defendant Zhu accepted bribes totaling 142,000 RMB from businesses such as \"Shangbailao Malatang,\" \"Tianyuan Xiaomaolv,\" and \"Creative Baby.\" Defendant Wang accepted bribes totaling 130,000 RMB from businesses such as \"Xiaozui Le You\" and \"Han Fu Gong.\" The evidence supporting these charges includes: witness testimonies; documentary evidence like household registration certificates; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on January 2 and January 4, 2016, the defendants Wang and Zhao committed theft three times in locations such as the back road of the county town and Zhenzhong Street, with the stolen items valued at a total of 13,156 yuan. The details are as follows: 1. On January 2, 2016, at about 18:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the county People's Hospital and stole a beige Edison brand electric tricycle belonging to Li. 2. On January 4, 2016, at about 18:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the Su Yuan Shopping Center on the back road of Zhenzhong Street in the county and stole a yellow Yadea brand electric bicycle belonging to Guo. 3. On January 4, 2016, at about 19:00, the defendants Wang and Zhao went to the entrance of the Lv Ling Fast Food Restaurant on Zhenzhong Street in the county and stole a red Shenghao brand electric tricycle belonging to Zhang. On May 24, 2018, the defendant Zhao compensated the victims Li, Guo, and Zhang with 5,000 yuan, 2,000 yuan, and 5,000 yuan respectively, obtaining their forgiveness. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution has submitted relevant documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, witness testimonies, on-site inspection records, identification records, and the statements and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that from February 2010 until the case was uncovered, defendant Yang operated a typing and photocopying shop near the east courtyard of a certain town government. During this period, defendant Yang forged 62 seals from state organs and enterprises, among which were 23 seals of insurance company underwriting business used for forging insurance policies; 12 dedicated seals for road transport management documents and 23 dedicated seals for road transport inspection, used for forging the \"People's Republic of China Road Transport Permit\"; and 4 seals for state organ business, including the \"Shandong Jining Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment Vehicle Management Business Seal (14),\" \"Dedicated Seal for Vehicle Maintenance Industry Management Office of a County's Transport Bureau,\" \"Yuncheng County Local Taxation Bureau Tax Collection Seal 05,\" and \"Tax Collection Seal 05 of a County's Local Taxation Bureau.\" In January 2018, the certain freight service company operated by defendant Wu and the Liangshan freight service company were found to have significant transport safety hazards, leading the Transport Management Office of a county's Transport Bureau to revoke their \"Road Transport Operation Permit,\" and the vehicles' \"Road Transport Certificate\" under the company were also revoked. Between February 28 and June 6, 2018, defendant Wu commissioned defendant Yang to forge 27 \"Road Transport Operation Permits\" at a price of 80 yuan each for use by the transport vehicles of the aforementioned companies. Defendant Yang made a profit of 1980 yuan from this. On June 8, 2018, defendant Yang was arrested by the police at a certain typing and photocopying shop in a town in a certain county; on September 3 of the same year, defendant Wu was arrested at a logistics park in a town in a certain county. In support of the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution has submitted the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: household registration certificates, etc.; 2. Witness testimonies: testimonies from witnesses such as Wu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Yang and Wu; 4. Identification records: identification records of defendant Yang; 5. Audiovisual materials: search recordings, etc.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges the following criminal acts committed by the defendants Yang and Li:\n\n1. Theft by Yang and Li: From mid to late June to mid-July 2020, the defendants Yang and Li entered the premises of the non-operational Gaokeng Power Plant, located in a certain town within a certain district of a certain city, on three separate nights. They stole approximately 750 pounds of pre-cut scrap iron blocks, which had been prepared by workers of Jiangxi Metal Recycling Co., Ltd., using an electric tricycle to transport the stolen goods out of the premises and then sold them. The proceeds from the sale were used by both defendants to purchase drugs for consumption. The stolen scrap iron blocks were appraised at a value of 675 yuan.\n\n2. Yang's act of providing a location for others to use drugs: From early July to September 2, 2020, defendant Yang provided his rented accommodation in a certain district of a certain city for others to use drugs on seven different occasions, allowing an individual named Tang to use drugs and, on one occasion, facilitated and used heroin together with Tang and the defendant Li.\n\nThe prosecution has submitted various evidence to support these allegations, including: the case registration form, the decision to file the case, testimonies from witnesses Tang, Cheng, and Zhang, statements from the victims Wu and Tu, identification records and photos, on-site identification records and photos, the seizure decision book, the seizure list and photos of seized items, the return list (another person's electric tricycle), the conclusion of the price assessment by Ping of the certain city and district Price Authentication Center, number [2020] 101, extraction records and photos, housing notification slip, administrative penalty decisions (related to Tang and Cheng), an explanation of the case, the permanent resident registration form, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yang and Li.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that on September 10, September 14, and October 13 of 2014, the defendants Yin and Lin consecutively allowed drug users, including He Mosheng, to gather at Room 303 of an apartment building behind the Minghua Supermarket in a village in a certain town of a certain city, to consume the drug methamphetamine by \"boiling pork.\" It has also been found that after coercive measures were taken against the defendant Yin, he proactively confessed to criminal facts not yet known to the judicial authorities, thus regarded as turning himself in, and assisted the public security organs in arresting other criminal suspects, demonstrating meritorious behavior. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Lin during the court trial and are substantiated by evidence including confessions from defendants Lin and Yin, as well as their identification of the crime scene photos provided by the prosecution and verified in court, testimonies from witnesses Xiong and He, on-site investigation records, diagrams and photos, identification records and photos of defendants Yin and Lin by witnesses Xiong and He, mutual identification records and photos of defendants Yin and Lin, crime scene photos identified by witness He, on-site test reports, site inspection records, administrative penalty decisions, statements, case-solving reports, receipts, arrest details, and the defendants' household registration documents, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The people's procuratorate of a certain county charged: At around 21:00 on August 7, 2019, Wu and Xiao were having dinner and drinking alcohol at a farmhouse restaurant in a certain village in Liu Hu Di Town, a certain county. At around midnight the following day, car owner Xiao stated that he had poor vision for night driving, so he instructed Wu, who had been drinking, to drive the small ordinary passenger vehicle with license plate number Xin ACM9** carrying Xiao and Li, another person who had been drinking, out of the farmhouse restaurant. They drove westward along Liu Hu Di Town and were intercepted by patrolling police officers at the entrance road segment of Liu Hu Di Town Post Office. According to the appraisal, the alcohol content in Wu's blood was 194mg/100ml, and the alcohol content in Xiao's blood was 187mg/100ml.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accuses: 1. One evening in late December 2014, \"Heihei\" (identity unknown) purchased 5 pills of methamphetamine (commonly known as crystal meth) from the defendant Chen and agreed to trade drugs near Overseas Chinese Community area in a certain town of the city. Later, defendant Chen contacted defendant Lin via phone to purchase 5 pills of methamphetamine for resale, and both parties agreed on a transaction price of 90 RMB per pill. That evening, defendant Lin drove a car to deliver defendant Chen to the area near Overseas Chinese Community in the town. Subsequently, defendant Chen sold the 5 pills totaling approximately 2.6 grams of methamphetamine to \"Heihei\" for 500 RMB, and returned 450 RMB to defendant Lin. 2. On an evening around January 10, 2015, \"Heihei\" purchased 5 pills of methamphetamine from defendant Chen, agreeing to trade drugs near Baidu Billiards Hall in Andu Market in a certain town of the city. Later, defendant Chen contacted defendant Lin via phone to purchase 5 pills of methamphetamine for resale, and both parties agreed on a transaction price of 90 RMB per pill. That evening, defendant Lin drove a car to deliver defendant Chen to the area near Baidu Billiards Hall in Andu Market of the town. Subsequently, defendant Chen sold the 5 pills totaling approximately 2.6 grams of methamphetamine to \"Heihei\". However, defendant Lin and defendant Chen have yet to receive payment for this transaction.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was ascertained that defendant Xue and defendant Li cohabited together. Starting in 2010, defendant Xue rented a building from the County Government Community Residents' Committee on County Government Street in a town in a certain city to operate a hotel named \"Sister Fang Hostel.\" Defendants Xue and Li jointly managed this hotel. Since running and managing \"Sister Fang Hostel,\" defendants Xue and Li, while knowing that women were engaging in prostitution in the hotel rooms, still allowed prostitutes to conduct prostitution activities in the hotel and charged each man who came for prostitution a \"door fee\" of 2 yuan. On June 5, 2014, knowing that women such as Huang Hong, Zhou Ping, Qin Xia, and Liao Li were engaging in prostitution in the hotel, defendants Xue and Li still opened rooms for these individuals to carry out prostitution activities. They charged men such as Gan Song, He Jia, Huang Lun, and Yao Lie who came for prostitution a \"door fee\" of 2 yuan each, allowing the aforementioned individuals to engage in prostitution activities in the hotel. On that day, the police apprehended the individuals involved. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xue, Li, and their defense during the trial. There are also documentary evidence such as the registration form for accepting the case, household registration certificates, records of the arrest process, transcripts of evidence collection, confiscation lists, accommodation registration cards, business licenses, testimonies from witnesses such as Huang Hong, Zhou Ping, Qin Xia, Liao Li, Qin Lian, Wei Liu, Fu Xiu, Wu Yong, Gan Song, He Jia, Huang Lun, Yao Lie, and Yang, confessions from defendants Xue and Li, site survey records, identification transcripts, photos, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Between August 2012 and January 2014, during their tenure at a sub-station of the Animal Epidemic Prevention and Supervision Center under the Veterinary and Aquatic Product Management Bureau of a certain county, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu failed to diligently perform their duties of supervision and management. They did not conduct synchronized full-process quarantine and necessary laboratory disease testing on the pig slaughtering process at a certain pig slaughtering point. This negligence allowed individuals like Sun and Wang at the slaughtering point to inject large quantities of toxic and harmful fluids into the pigs during the slaughtering process and then sell the meat, resulting in the sale of toxic and harmful pork valued at over 4.2 million yuan, severely endangering public health. During the trial, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu did not dispute the charges brought by the public prosecutor. Defendant Gao's defense counsel agreed with the facts of the crime charged by the public prosecutor, argued that the criminal act was less severe, did not result in serious consequences, and that Gao pled guilty, suggesting that a lenient or reduced punishment could be applied. Defendant Zhang's defense counsel argued that Zhang's dereliction of duty did not cause serious harm, and that Sun should bear full responsibility for the water injection incident at the slaughterhouse. The defense counsel for defendants Pu and Li argued that both were granted leave by their superiors, and after leaving their positions, could no longer fulfill quarantine duties. They asserted that the incident primarily occurred after defendants Pu and Li had left, and thus there was no causal relationship between their actions and the harm caused by negligence, indicating they were not guilty of a crime.\n\nAfter hearing, it was ascertained that between August 2012 and January 2014, during their tenure at a sub-station of the Animal Epidemic Prevention and Supervision Center under the Veterinary and Aquatic Product Management Bureau of a certain county, defendants Gao, Zhang, Li, and Pu, failed to diligently perform their supervisory and management duties and did not strictly adhere to the relevant laws, regulations, and procedures concerning quarantine work during the pig slaughtering process at a certain pig slaughtering point. This led to individuals like Sun and Wang injecting large quantities of toxic and harmful fluids into pigs during the slaught", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": [], "Pu": []}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: On July 1, 2014, defendants Zhu and Xie conspired to steal elevator motherboards. They drove a Hebei XXX1** Volkswagen Lavida car to the 7th floor machine room of a construction site at the Fusheng Huaou Hotel on East Chongming Island Road, Huangdao District, a certain city, and stole 12 Mitsubishi elevator motherboards from the machine room. According to the appraisal, the value of the 12 stolen elevator motherboards was 24,052 RMB.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 3:00 a.m. on November 14, 2013, Liu contacted defendant Wang to purchase methamphetamine. Defendant Wang then called defendant Ye, asking Ye to provide drugs for the transaction. Defendant Ye agreed to sell Wang a package of methamphetamine and a package of Magu for 200 RMB, with an additional 150 RMB for transportation expenses. At approximately 6:10 a.m. that day, defendant Ye brought the drugs to the agreed transaction location at the Jinhuhotel on Wenjin Road in the Luohu District of this city. He sold the methamphetamine and Magu to Liu downstairs and collected 500 RMB in drug money. After the transaction was completed, the police ambushed the defendants, apprehending defendant Wang at the scene with drugs and 500 RMB in drug money, and also arrested defendant Ye downstairs at the Jinhuhotel. According to the identification, the involved methamphetamine weighed 2.3 grams and contained methamphetamine components; the involved Magu weighed 0.13 grams and contained methamphetamine and caffeine components. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: the involved drugs and drug money; 2. Documentary evidence: case registration form, case filing decision, seizure decision, seizure list, receipt for suspected drugs, explanation of drug money, arrest reports, identity information of defendants Ye and Wang, fingerprint cards, call records. 3. Witness testimony: testimony of witness Liu; 4. Statements and defenses of the defendants: statements and defenses of defendants Ye and Wang; 5. Expert opinion: drug identification documents; 6. Inspection, examination, and identification records: scene inspection records and photographs.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused the defendants Cheng and Jiang, stating that from August 2014, Cheng and Jiang were hired by Zhang and Wang (both have been sentenced) to keep watch below the Xinnanya Hotel in this district to avoid inspection for Zhang and Wang and others' activities of accommodating prostitution. The period lasted until December 18 and November 27 of the same year respectively. During this time, Zhang and Wang and others accommodated prostitute Fan on September 7 for prostitution once, accommodated prostitute Yao on October 4 for prostitution once, and accommodated Zhao on September 12 and December 11 for prostitution once each. After the case was exposed, defendant Cheng and Jiang were apprehended and brought to justice on September 11, 2015, and December 15, 2015, respectively. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cheng and Jiang during the trial, and were verified by evidence such as cash, condoms, lubricants, site photos, WeChat records, SMS records, call records, accommodation records, administrative penalty decisions, criminal attached civil judgment, criminal judgment, criminal files, population information, testimonies of witnesses including Zhang, Wang, Liu, Fan, Huang, Zhu, Zhang, Yao, Wang, Zhu, Ye, Hu, Huang, Jin, Zhao, Lin, Cai, and Wang, circumstances of apprehension, search transcripts, identification transcripts, and inspection transcripts, which are sufficient to confirm the charges. Regarding the issue of whether defendant Cheng constitutes a confession, after investigation, defendant Cheng stated during the fourth interrogation in the investigation stage that he started working at Zhang's place in August 2014, keeping watch at Xinnanya Hotel, and during the trial, he did not dispute the criminal facts charged in the indictment, thus it can be recognized that defendant Cheng has the circumstances of a confession.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on the evening of April 19, 2013, at around 7 p.m., the defendant Yang, at the request of Chen, purchased drugs worth 2,000 yuan from the defendant Liu. Subsequently, the defendant Liu bought methamphetamine worth 1,500 yuan from \"Duck\" (identity unknown) and handed it over to Yang. When the defendant Yang delivered the methamphetamine to Chen near the Old West Station in the Shuixin Street area of a certain district in a certain city, Yang was caught on the spot by public security officers. A package of suspected drugs was seized on site, containing a package of suspected methamphetamine and a suspected magu pill. After examination, the seized methamphetamine weighed 3.67 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine components, while the suspected magu weighed 0.09 grams and tested positive for methamphetamine and caffeine components. According to a forensic psychiatric evaluation, the defendant Yang had limited capacity for criminal responsibility at the time of the incident.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in July 2014, the defendant Yin rented a storefront in a certain town for 6,000 yuan per year. Later, defendant Yin and defendant Chen conspired to use a Longxiang Tianxia gaming machine (which can be operated independently by seven people simultaneously) in the storefront to set up a casino for others to gamble. Subsequently, the two defendants hired Huang, Shi, and Zhang to work as casino attendants, responsible for managing the casino, collecting money, and adding or deducting credits. The illegal proceeds were transferred by the attendants into defendant Yin's account at the Rural Commercial Bank. On August 20, 2014, officers from the Liangping County Public Security Bureau sealed the storefront. During this period, defendants Yin and Chen made a total profit of 28,690 yuan. It was determined that the Longxiang Tianxia gaming machine had gambling functions. On August 25, 2014, defendants Yin and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Management Brigade of the Liangping County Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Chen during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by the household registration certificates, confessions, and defenses of defendants Yin and Chen; the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Shi, Zhang, and others; an opinion statement; case registration form, payment vouchers, and a savings account statement from the Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendants Zhang and Fang, as the director and deputy director responsible for safety production at the calcium carbide plant of Shuangxin Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. in a certain city, knowingly allowed the No. 4 calcium carbide furnace in Workshop No. 2 of the plant to operate with malfunctioning equipment. The safety production facilities did not meet national standards, and the hydrogen gas analyzer and furnace pressure gauge displayed inaccurate data. Despite being aware of these issues, they failed to fulfill their respective safety responsibilities and did not eliminate the hazards in a timely manner. As a result, on April 5, 2012, at approximately 14:15, an explosion occurred in the No. 4 furnace in Workshop No. 2 of the plant, causing a serious accident that resulted in 1 death and injuries of varying degrees to 16 people. In support of the above facts, the prosecution provided evidence including the report materials, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, on-site inspection records, appraisal documents, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that from March 2015 to June 26, 2015, defendants Li and Ma, in partnership (each holding half of the shares), operated a casino on the second floor of No. 38 Kaiyuan Road, Taizhou Economic Development Zone, in a game room, organizing gambling in the form of \"Baerzhan\" (a type of card game) and profiting from rake-offs. During this period, they employed defendant Lin to keep watch for the casino. During the operation of the casino, they illegally profited more than 20,000 RMB from rake-offs, while Lin profited over 600 RMB and some cigarettes. On June 26, 2015, the casino was raided by public security officers, and defendants Li, Ma, and Lin were all apprehended. It was also found that defendants Li and Ma returned illegal proceeds amounting to 21,000 RMB, and defendant Lin returned illegal proceeds amounting to 600 RMB during the trial. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li, Ma, and Lin during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as household registration certificates, population information, administrative penalty decisions, evidence preservation decisions, inventories, seizure decisions, testimonies of witnesses Huang, He, Zhao, and others, records of arrest, details of the case, inspection records, identification records, and other evidences, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial and verification: At approximately 1 a.m. on April 9, 2013, defendants Sun and Chang, among others, were consuming at the Gucci room on the fourth floor of a certain KTV in the Lubei District of a city when defendant Sun, failing to find a certain waitress and out of frustration, smashed a BBSU-5000DM microphone in the room (valued at RMB 475). While settling the bill, defendant Sun also smashed a TCL telephone on the fourth-floor bar counter (valued at RMB 80). Subsequently, defendant Sun punched the KTV manager, victim Kong (乙), on the left side of the face when he came to mediate. The injury to the victim Kong (乙) was assessed as minor. Defendant Chang, also out of frustration, kicked and broke the door to the bathroom in a certain KTV room (valued at RMB 2945) for no reason. On May 23, 2013, defendant Chang voluntarily surrendered to the Qiaotun Police Station of the Lubei District Branch of the city's Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Sun and Chang during the court trial process and are corroborated by victim Kong (乙)'s statement, testimonies from witnesses Kong (甲), Yuan, He, Chen, Wang, and others; assessment opinions; audio-visual materials; household registration information; prior record materials; documentary evidence, among other evidence.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Chang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: At around 11 PM on October 19, 2015, the defendant Li and friends, including Qiu (currently at large), were drinking at the Leman Bar in Yiyang. After the bar's resident singer left, they began to sing inside the bar. A dispute arose with Guo Molong, Ding Moujie, and others at the neighboring table over the order of singers, which was later mediated by the bar owner, Zou. Around midnight, the defendant Li and others again confronted Guo Molong, Ding Moujie, and others who were resting on a long bench outside the bar. The defendant Li first slapped Ding Moujie. The defendant Tang, along with Qiu, Chen (called by Li over the phone, currently at large), and several others present at the time, then proceeded to beat Ding Moujie and subsequently Guo Molong, who came out later, resulting in injuries to both Guo Molong and Ding Moujie. A forensic examination determined that the injuries to both Guo Molong and Ding Moujie were minor. Following the incident, the defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the crime. The defendant Tang was apprehended. The defendant Li reached a settlement agreement with the two victims and obtained their forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Tang during the trial proceedings, and they are corroborated by the statements of the victims Guo Molong and Ding Moujie, testimonies from witnesses Xia, Hu Xiqian, and Zou, the police dispatch report, call records, the on-site inspection record, the appraisal report, identification transcripts, receipts, the letter of forgiveness, prior conviction records of the defendant Tang, and documentation of the arrest and identification details of defendants Li and Tang. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": []}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in early February 2019, the defendants Yang and Li discussed and agreed to jointly establish a gaming arcade for gambling in the basement of a residential area on a certain street in a certain district of a certain city. It was agreed that defendant Li would invest 14,000 yuan, while defendant Yang would be responsible for the remaining investment, purchasing the gambling machines, sourcing clients, and managing operations. Li would hold a 30% share, while Yang would hold a 70% share. Defendant Yang purchased a fishing game machine (for eight simultaneous users) and a \"Missing One\" game machine (for eight simultaneous users) to conduct gambling operations by providing credits and cashing out coins, exclusively for others to gamble. They hired Hu as a cashier with a monthly salary of 5,000 yuan. The arcade operated from February 25, 2019, to March 30, 2019, accumulating illegal profits totaling 69,600 yuan. Defendant Yang distributed over 10,000 yuan in gambling dividends to defendant Li, paid Hu a salary of 5,000 yuan, and retained the remaining gambling funds. On March 30, 2019, at around 2 AM, Ning, Kang, and Yang were caught by the police while gambling at the arcade. The police seized the fishing game machine (for eight simultaneous users) and the \"Missing One\" game machine (for eight simultaneous users). An appraisal confirmed both machines had gambling properties. Defendant Yang was apprehended at the scene, and defendant Li was captured by officers from the Xinxing Street Police Station on April 5, 2019. The police seized two mobile phones (OPPO R15, OPPO R17), a construction bank card, and a portable POS machine related to the case.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around midnight on February 18, 2019, the defendants Gu and Dong, together with Li, Zeng, and Wang (the latter three not prosecuted), after premeditation, had Zeng reach an agreement with the victim Liu via the online chat software \"Momo\" to meet at Room 435 in the Shangkeyou Hotel on Sifanghe Road, in a certain district of a certain city, to engage in sexual relations with Liu. Later, as per the agreement, Zeng performed oral sex with Liu. Subsequently, Gu, Li, Dong, and Wang entered the room and extorted Liu for 5,300 yuan by threatening to report to the public security authorities that Zeng was a minor. To substantiate the above accusation, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including records of the arrest, household registration information, a letter of understanding, the statement of the victim Liu, as well as confessions from defendants Gu, Dong, and co-defendants Li, Zeng, Wang, identification records, site identification transcripts, and photos.", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged: One day in the 11th or 12th month of the lunar calendar in 2009, the defendant Jia purchased a stolen silver-gray Wuling Light minivan from Jia Jia (another person with the same surname) for 4,000 yuan on the road east of his village. The vehicle was originally valued at 22,226 yuan. After the crime, the stolen vehicle was returned to the owner. One day in May 2010, the defendant Shi purchased a stolen silver-gray Wuling Hongtu minivan from Jia Jia for 5,300 yuan on the same road. This vehicle was valued at 49,900 yuan. After the crime, the stolen vehicle was returned to the owner. The evidence submitted by the public prosecution includes: the statements of the victims (Guo and He), the list of seized and returned items from the Daming County Public Security Bureau, the price assessment conclusions, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jia and Shi.", "label": {"Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wuzhong District of a certain city charges: Defendant Yu, in collaboration with others, after premeditation, set up a casino from mid-June to July 1, 2014, in a certain place near the import and export processing area on Guoxiang Street, Wuzhong District of a certain city, on a civilian ship and in a residence in a certain village in a certain town. They arranged for fixed personnel to engage in shuffling, skimming, and overseeing the venue, and they illegally profited RMB 100,000. Defendant Wang, knowing that defendant Yu and others were operating a casino, still provided gambling funds to participants Li and Gu for profit, amounting to a total of RMB 95,000. The prosecution presented corresponding evidence to prove the above facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that: 1. At around midnight on February 9, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang went to the residence of the victim Qiu in a certain district of a certain city. They pushed the door open and entered, stealing an Asus laptop from the secondary bedroom. According to the appraisal, the laptop involved in the case was valued at 2,600 RMB. 2. At around 11 PM on February 14, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang went to the courtyard of Zhang A's house in a certain district of a certain city. They found an electric bike of the victim Zhang parked in the courtyard and stole a battery set from the bike. According to the appraisal, the battery set of the electric bike involved in the case was valued at 1,132 RMB. On February 16, 2020, defendants Zhang and Zhang were arrested by the public security authorities in a certain district of a certain city. After coming to the case, both defendants truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. The laptop and electric bike battery involved in the case have been returned to each of the victims.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yongchuan District, a certain city, charged that from late February to March 9, 2015, the defendants Zhou and Yao set up two \"fishing machines\" with gambling functions that allowed for score withdrawal and could be independently operated by sixteen people in a facade in a certain town in Yongchuan District. They organized gambling activities by providing cash to others in exchange for scores. Participants purchased 20,000 game points with 100 yuan in cash at the casino and used them on the \"fishing machines\", exchanging the points won in the game for cash at the same rate. At around 11 PM on March 9, public security police raided the casino and seized two \"fishing machines\" on site. On June 5, 2015, after being notified by telephone by public security police, defendant Zhou voluntarily turned himself in at the Hegang Police Station in Yongchuan District, a certain city; on September 20, after being notified by telephone by public security police, defendant Yao voluntarily turned himself in at the Hegang Police Station in Yongchuan District, a certain city. After arriving, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. According to the appraisal by the Public Security Bureau of Yongchuan District, a certain city, the two aforementioned \"fishing machines\" are electronic gaming facilities with gambling functions and can be independently operated by eighteen people for gambling. It was also found that during the operation of the casino by defendants Zhou and Yao, Zhou was responsible for the management and operation, with a total profit of 13,000 yuan, which had not yet been distributed. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Yao during the court trial, and they pleaded guilty in court. The evidence includes the case acceptance registration form, filing decision, permanent resident information form, apprehension process description, identification record, extraction record, seizure list, on-site identification record, criminal photos, case handling explanation, administrative penalty decision of public security, testimonies of witnesses Fan Moumou, Feng Moumou, Luo Mou, Chen Moumou, Liu Moumou, confessions of defendants Zhou and Yao, identification opinion of electronic gaming equipment, audiovisual materials, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of February 7, 2018, defendants Zheng and Shen conspired together to steal a golden Meizu mobile phone valued at 715 RMB from the coat pocket of the victim, Xu, at a cake shop in a certain city. Furthermore, it was found that after the crime, defendants Zheng and Shen voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The mobile phone involved in the case was seized by the police and returned to the victim.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendants Lu, Xia, and Tang, after prior consultation, jointly went to a certain town in a certain city on the evening of March 12, 2015, to steal electric bicycles. That evening, the three defendants stole two Tailg electric bicycles located on an open space on the east side of victim Zhou's house in a certain village in a certain town in a certain city. They also stole one Tailg electric bicycle located in a car shed on the north side of victim Li's house in a certain village in a certain town in a certain city. An assessment determined that the stolen vehicles were worth 5,470 RMB. After the incident, defendant Tang voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his crime; defendants Lu and Xia also truthfully confessed their crimes. The public security organs seized two Tailg electric bicycles and returned them to victims Zhou and Li. Defendant Lu returned 700 RMB of stolen money, which has been given back to victim Zhou. The facts aforementioned were not disputed by defendants Lu, Xia, and Tang during the trial. There is also testimony from victims Zhou and Li, witness testimonies from Zhu Jia, Zhu Yi, and Gu, and documentary evidence such as basic information on permanent residents, an incident report from Zhuhong Police Station of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, lists of seizures and returns of items, power of attorney documents, and receipts. Additionally, identification records, records of identifying the crime scene, crime scene photos, and diagrams produced by a certain city's Public Security Bureau, as well as appraisal conclusion from the price certification center of a certain city, sufficiently corroborate these facts. Further evidence proving other facts of the case includes administrative penalty decisions from the police, a criminal judgment from a certain city's people's court, and a certificate of release upon completion of a sentence.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of September 22, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 80 kilograms of steel wire, later selling the stolen goods for 90 yuan. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 72 yuan. On the afternoon of September 23, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 80 kilograms of steel wire, later selling the stolen goods for 90 yuan. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 72 yuan. On the afternoon of September 26, 2015, the defendants Xu and Tian went to the Yongming Wire Drawing Factory in Fucun Town, Jindong District, of a certain city and stole 140 kilograms of steel wire and a wire drawing water pan, but were caught on the spot. According to the valuation by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city, the stolen steel wire was valued at 126 yuan and the stolen wire drawing water pan was valued at 1,045 yuan. It was further found that the defendants Xu and Tian have returned 180 yuan of the stolen money. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Xu and Tian during the trial and are corroborated by the basic household registration information of the defendants Xu and Tian; the process of their arrest; the explanatory note; the decision and inventory of evidence preservation; the testimony of the witness Yan; the statement of the victim Jiang; the confessions and defenses of the defendants Xu and Tian; the price appraisal report by the Jindong District Price Certification Center of the city; the on-site records and photos; the identification transcripts and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tian": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Starting from December 10, 2015, the defendant Fang used a shop on the first floor at No. 19, Alley 2, Jialian Road, Tanzhou Town, Zhongshan City as a base, operating a casino using poker cards to play \"San Gong.\" Fang hired defendants Tan and Chen to manage card dealing and taking a rake at the casino, while hiring defendant Zhang to safeguard the rake money. It was further found that at about 12:30 a.m. on December 17, 2015, when the public security personnel raided the aforementioned base, they apprehended defendants Fang, Tan, Chen, Zhang, and the gamblers Wang Xiuxiu, Li Ling, Li Yun, among others (all handled in separate cases). One deck of poker cards used for gambling and gambling funds totaling 9,010 RMB was seized on the spot. After being taken into custody, Fang, Tan, Chen, and Zhang truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court trial, the defendants Fang, Tan, Chen, and Zhang also raised no objections to the above facts, which are substantiated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, defendants' confessions and defenses, as well as records of inspections, checks, and identifications, all sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that at about 12:00 noon on August 28, 2013, the defendant Jiao, in order to help Zhu and Guo, who did not have welding vocational qualification certificates, evade punishment by the public security authorities, contacted a man engaged in making fake certificates (identity unknown) by phone at the Jin Du Jia Yuan construction site in the Xicheng Street area of a certain district of a certain city to discuss purchasing fake certificates. Afterward, defendant Jiao met with defendant Tang near the entrance of Luqiao Middle School in the Luqiao District of a certain city to conduct a transaction, purchasing forged vocational welding qualification certificates for Zhu, Guo, and himself for 450 RMB. Subsequently, defendant Jiao was caught using Zhu's and Guo's fake certificates at the Chengxi Police Station of the Huangyan Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city. Later, defendant Jiao assisted the public security authorities in apprehending another criminal suspect. It was also found that on the evening of August 28, 2013, defendant Tang was apprehended by the public security authorities. The above facts are uncontested by defendants Tang and Jiao during the court trial and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu and Guo, the identification transcript by defendant Jiao, physical evidence—the three forged welding qualification certificates, the seizure list and transcript issued by the public security authorities, the evidence collection list, the administrative penalty decision, the certificate issued by the Vocational Skill Appraisal Center of Jiaojiang District, a certain city's criminal judgment (2011) Tai Lu Xing Chu Zi No. 387 from the People's Court of Luqiao District, the explanation by the public security authorities on the apprehension process of the two defendants, the identification documents of the defendants, and the certificate of meritorious service by defendant Jiao. The evidence is sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On the morning of May 21, 2013, the defendants Zhong and Lin, after consultation, went to the rented ground-floor room at No. 678, Zhangjiaqiao Community, Chengdong Village, Weitang Street, a certain county. They entered the interior using a card insertion method and stole a Samsung digital camera (valued at 1,000 RMB) and a black induction cooker (valued at 238.50 RMB) belonging to the victim Qin, which were placed inside the rental room. The total value was 1,238.50 RMB. After the incident, the induction cooker was seized and returned to the victim. It was also found that after being brought to justice, the defendants Zhong and Lin confessed their crimes truthfully. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the victim Qin's statement, the price appraisal conclusion report, on-site investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, inspection records, evidence preservation decision, return list, household registration proof, the process of capture, and other evidence, sufficient for the verdict.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that: On the morning of May 25, 2013, the defendants He and Tang, after prior discussion, went to the \"Daming\" clothing store at 82 Chuancheng Middle Road, Nanfeng Street, in this county. Under the pretense of buying clothes, they each distracted the attention of the store owner, Zhou, and then defendant Tang stole two iPhone 4 phones that Zhou had placed on the cashier counter. According to the appraisal, the value of the two phones amounted to 5,070 RMB. After the incident, defendant He compensated the victim, Zhou, with 4,778 RMB. On August 13, 2013, defendant Tang voluntarily surrendered to the Xianju County Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants He and Tang during the trial, and are verified by the victim Zhou's statement, identification records and photos, price appraisal conclusion, list of seized and returned items, details of the case resolution, criminal record inquiry, and identification proof among other evidence that was cross-examined in court, sufficient to establish the facts. Defendant Tang is currently three months pregnant. The ultrasound report and medical certificate from Xianju County People's Hospital have been cross-examined and filed in the case.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on September 1, 2011, defendant He opened the Haining Haizhou Milan Station Bag Store at 20 Shanghai Road, First Floor, Phase One, Haining China Leather City, and employed defendant Sun as a sales clerk to jointly sell bags they knew to be counterfeit registered trademark items. On April 29, 2012, the industrial and commercial authorities conducted an inspection of the Haining Haizhou Milan Station Bag Store, and found on-site 12 bags marked with the \"CHANEL\" trademark, 3 bags with the \"GUCCI\" trademark, 4 bags with the \"HERMES\" trademark, and 1 bag with the \"BURBERRY\" trademark. An appraisal by the trademark registrants and their authorized agents confirmed that these items were counterfeit registered trademark goods with a total value of 361,145 RMB. During the trial, defendants He and Sun did not object to the above facts, which are further substantiated by the site inspection records from the Haining Administrative Bureau for Industry and Commerce, the decision on compulsory measures, inventory of items and photographs, seized items list, appraisal report, trademark registration certificate and amendment proof, approval of renewal proof, evidence retrieval list, exchange rate explanation, price appraisal report, business registration information, administrative penalty decision, account of arrest, explanatory statement, and household registration proof, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: On December 26, 2013, the defendant Ye applied for a UnionPay card merchant account with Zhongfu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain city via the Han Chang Appliance Store and the Kumei Clothing Store, both located in Xixiang, Bao'an District, under his wife’s name. Subsequently, using two mobile POS machines, he began engaging in the illegal business of credit card cash-out. Since January 2014, Ye and the co-defendant Lu, his brother-in-law, printed and posted multiple credit card cash-out advertisements. They illegally cashed out and repaid credit cards for cardholders multiple times using POS machines by fabricating transactions, charging a handling fee of 0.9% to 1.2%. By the time the case was filed, they had illegally cashed out and repaid over 3.7 million RMB for credit card holders. On March 7, 2014, Ye and Lu were caught on the spot by police officers while facilitating cash-outs for others' credit cards near Yiyuan Road and Daxin Road in a certain district in the city. The defendants Ye and Lu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court proceedings, supported by evidence including the seized POS machines, UnionPay card transaction slips, credit card cash-out advertisement cards, mobile phones, case registration forms, mobile phone account information, call records, bank account information and transaction records, UnionPay card merchant agreements, seizure decisions, arrest records, records of confiscated goods, identity information of the defendants, testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Chen, and Lu A, on-site inspection records and photographs of the scene, identification records by witnesses Jiang and Chen regarding Ye and Lu, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Ye and Lu.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in September 2012, the defendant Jiao learned that the victim Yue had been discovered by the public security authorities for theft. Jiao falsely claimed to Yue that he knew people in the police and could exempt Yue from criminal responsibility. To further convince Yue and get money quickly, Jiao discussed with the defendant Yang, and then they found the defendant Huang to impersonate a police officer to scare Yue's wife, promising him benefits after the deed was done. Huang, together with the defendants Liu and Hou, went to Yue's house and impersonated police officers to intimidate Yue's wife. Yue believed them and went to Jiao and Yang again. After a discussion, Yue handed over 30,000 RMB to smooth things over. Yue later gave 30,000 RMB in cash to Jiao and Yang in two installments. After the incident, the two returned the illegal proceeds to the victim's family. Evidence for the charges include household registration certificates, receipts, witness testimonies such as from Zheng and others, statements from the victims Yue and Zhao, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jiao and others.", "label": {"Jiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: On December 21, 2012, at 10:30 PM, four police officers including Yan and Zhao from the Chaoge Town Police Station in Qi County received a 110 directive to respond to an incident at the Once Upon a Time sentiment music venue in Qi County. While the police station officers were addressing a dispute between defendants Du and Guan and the music venue staff over payment issues, Du and Guan unreasonably assaulted the music venue staff. When the police intervened, the two defendants assaulted officers Yan and Zhao, obstructing the police in the execution of their duties.", "label": {"Du": ["Surveillance"], "Guan": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused defendants Wang and Xu of violating national tobacco monopoly management laws and regulations from September 2014 to September 2015. Without the permission of the tobacco monopoly administrative licensing department and without a tobacco retail license, Wang and Xu repeatedly purchased cigarettes at low prices, including brands such as Sanwu, Marlboro, Export Suyan, and Wuxing Hongshanshu, from the store operated by individuals Lin and Zheng in a district of a city in Guangdong Province. They transported these cigarettes by long-distance bus to a certain city, selling them at a markup to individuals such as Cui, thus obtaining profits from the price difference, amounting to an illegal business operation total of 145,657.5 yuan. Among them, defendant Wang was involved in 5 incidents, with illegal business operations totaling 145,657.5 yuan; defendant Xu was involved in 2 incidents, with illegal business operations totaling 94,628 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang and Xu truthfully confessed their crimes. The evidence supporting the accusations includes documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, inspection records, and photographs.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on a day in December 2012, the defendant Fang purchased an unlicensed HJ125-3 Haojiang motorcycle for 900 RMB near the Wukuaishi Electric Appliance Market in a certain city. After riding the motorcycle back to a certain town in a district of the city, Fang entrusted the defendant Chen to sell the motorcycle. On a day in January 2013, Chen, knowing that the motorcycle had no legal documentation, sold it to Li. After the crime was discovered, the motorcycle was recovered and returned to the owner. On May 15, 2013, according to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a district of the city, the value of the motorcycle was appraised at 3,456 RMB. On January 23, 2014, Chen was arrested by the police and truthfully confessed to his criminal acts. On January 6, 2015, Fang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Fang and Chen during the trial, and were confirmed by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, and expert opinions, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Fang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleged: On March 29, 2016, at around 23:00, the defendant He, due to an improper relationship between his wife and the victim Guo Moumou, along with the defendant Mu, drove Guo Moumou's car to Shengdi Toll Station, Fengshan, and other places to assault and verbally abuse Guo Moumou, restricting his personal freedom. Around 2:00 in the early morning of March 30, 2016, the two defendants took the victim Guo Moumou to the home of the defendant Xu at Xingnan Market, and asked Xu for tools such as sewing needles, a bamboo back scraper, pliers, and Thai peppers to assault and verbally abuse Guo Moumou, which Xu did not prevent. Two hours later, the defendants He and Mu took Guo Moumou to Room 501 of Longwan Leisure Club in Lishi District, continuing to restrict Guo Moumou's personal freedom and not allowing him to leave until around 15:30 on March 30, 2016, when he was allowed to leave. According to the forensic identification by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Lishi District Public Security Bureau: the injuries to Guo Moumou's perineum and left index finger were both assessed as minor injuries. After the incident, the parties had reconciled and compensated for the civil part, and the victim expressed forgiveness. The evidence establishing the above facts includes: 1. Confessions from the defendants He, Mu, and Xu; 2. Statement from the victim Guo Moumou; 3. Testimonies from witnesses He Mou A, Guo Mou A, and Li Moumou; 4. Forensic medical injury assessment report; 5. Reporting materials, seizure list, return list, diagnosis certificate, photos of Guo Moumou's injuries, extraction records, photos extracted from defendant Xu's house, investigation table of criminal record and bad conduct, administrative penalty decision, civil mediation agreement, letter of understanding, account of the incident, household registration proof, and other documentary evidence.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Mu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On June 14, 2013, Youyi Chunqiu Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. received authorization from Joymax Co., Ltd. of South Korea to exclusively operate the online game \"Silkroad Online\" (Chinese name: 丝路传说, 新丝路) in a certain region. Between May 2015 and August 2017, the defendants Li, Huo, and Liu, knowing that they had not obtained authorization or permission from Youyi Chunqiu Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and did not possess the agency rights or operating rights for the game, still privately set up a server named \"Huoyue Silkroad\" via the internet to profit by selling in-game currency to players. The total illegal business amount amounted to more than 220,000 yuan. On August 17, 2018, defendants Li and Huo were apprehended by the public security authorities; on August 19 of the same month, defendant Liu was apprehended by the public security authorities. The prosecution has provided all the evidence to substantiate the above facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In February 2014, the defendant Xiao, without obtaining a certificate of food quality, purchased counterfeit health products such as \"Cordyceps\" and \"Chinese Herbal Viagra\" from others and placed them for sale in their adult goods store located at No. 25 East North Road, Lingxi Town, a certain county. The defendant Chen, knowing that the sexual health food sold by the defendant Xiao did not have a certificate of quality, still helped with the sales. On July 27, 2015, law enforcement officers discovered counterfeit sexual health products such as \"Cordyceps,\" \"Chinese Herbal Viagra,\" and \"Double Effect Fast Erection\" in their store and on the back seat of an electric scooter parked beside it. According to the appraisal, the confiscated items, including \"Double Effect Fast Erection\" (25 pills in total), \"Ant Power\" (56 pills in total), \"Golden Maca\" (30 pills in total), \"German Black Ant Essence Tablets\" (16 pills in total), \"Chinese Herbal Viagra\" (38 pills in total), and \"Cordyceps\" (30 pills in total), were all found to contain sildenafil. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xiao and Chen during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence such as the testimony of witness Mr. Chen, the arrest record, test reports, on-site inspection transcripts, case transfer documents, notifications of designated jurisdiction, lists of seized property, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that between 2012 and 2013, the defendants Sun and Li, at the request of Liu (who has been sentenced), the legal representative of Wuhan Huaxia School Education Consulting Co., actively facilitated communication, acted as intermediaries, and ultimately helped Liu twice bribe Jiang (handled in a separate case), a staff member of the Higher Education Self-study Examination Office Planning Section of Hubei Provincial Education Examination Institute, with a total of 100,000 RMB in cash for illegally handling \"course exemptions\" and \"diploma approvals\" for self-study exam students. During this period, Defendant Sun received 5,000 RMB in cash from Liu. On September 11, 2014, when the prosecution interrogated defendants Sun and Li, both defendants voluntarily confessed to the above criminal facts. After the incident, Defendant Sun returned the 5,000 RMB illicit money. Defendants Sun, Li, and their defense lawyers did not object to the facts and charges in the indictment. Li's defense lawyer argued that: 1. Li voluntarily confessed after being brought to justice, showing remorse; 2. Before prosecution, Li truthfully confessed his criminal facts. The lawyer requested the court to reduce or mitigate the punishment for Li. The above facts are confirmed by evidence, such as the custody report issued by the People's Procuratorate of Hongshan District, Wuhan City; testimonies from witnesses Jiang and Liu; the household registration information of defendants Sun and Li; the list of students who received exam exemptions and diploma approvals illegally; the subject identity materials of Jiang issued by Hubei Provincial Education Examination Institute and documents from the institute; the criminal judgment of Hongshan District People's Court of Wuhan City; the confessions and defenses of defendants Sun and Li; and other materials. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from February 20 to March 4, 2018, in the supermarket run by defendant Jia next to a primary school in Juan County, defendants Jia and Zhang placed one \"Golden Monkey Sending Blessings\" game machine and one fishing game machine for others to engage in gambling activities. It has been determined that the aforementioned game machines are video game devices with gambling functions, equivalent to a total of 3 single-player machines.", "label": {"Jia": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that on March 22, 2017, the defendant Sha, at the request of Gong, helped Gong apply for an online loan of 12,900 yuan. Due to a delay in the loan disbursement, defendants Sha and Wang conspired to illegally possess Gong's loan, deceiving Gong by claiming that the loan application was unsuccessful. After the loan was credited, defendant Sha embezzled 12,900 yuan from Gong's bank account via WeChat and Alipay transfers. Sha falsely informed Wang that only 6,000 yuan had been embezzled. After the incident, defendants Sha and Wang truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendant Sha assisted the public security organs in apprehending other defendants. Defendants Sha and Wang proactively returned the embezzled money. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Sha and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Gong's statement, testimony from witnesses including Wei, household registration information, the case registration form, the case initiation decision, the process of bringing the case to light, identification records, bank card transaction details, receipts, photographs, explanatory notes, as well as Alipay and WeChat transaction records, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Sha": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that from December 2018 to September 2019, defendants Cui and Chen, without proper documentation or qualifications, repeatedly purchased yellow weight-loss capsules containing sibutramine from Wang A through WeChat. They sold these capsules via methods such as direct delivery by Wang A or customer self-pickup. The total sales amount of defendant Cui was 4026 yuan, with a profit of about 1000 yuan. Defendant Chen's total sales amounted to 2900 yuan, with a profit of around 700 to 800 yuan. During the sales period, customers reported adverse reactions after consuming the capsules to the two defendants. Defendants Cui and Chen raised no objections to the above facts during the court hearing. The evidence, which includes testimonies from witnesses Wang 1, Lin, Ma, Zhang 1, Su, Liu 1, Bi, Zhai, Pei, Luo, Zhang 2, Yan, Qi, Liu 2, and Wang 2, personal information on WeChat, WeChat chat records, WeChat transaction records, identification records and photos, seizure decision documents, the seized yellow capsules and plastic bottles, the testing report from the Beijing Micro Chemical Research Institute Analysis and Testing Center, and household registration proof, is sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: Defendant Ye and the victim Qiu Erlang are relatives. At around 14:00 on March 2, 2015, defendants Ye and Mo traveled from a certain county to the XX Hotel entrance at XX Square in Guilin City. Defendant Ye acted as a lookout while defendant Mo used a duplicate key, previously made by defendant Ye, to steal a red Guang'ao two-wheeled moped (valued at 2,640 RMB) owned by Qiu Erlang's son, Qiu Yilang, which was parked there. On the 5th of the same month, defendant Ye demanded money from Qiu Erlang and his son under the pretense of helping to find the vehicle and was subsequently arrested by police officers. The stolen property has since been recovered and returned to the victim. These facts are not disputed by defendants Ye and Mo during the court proceedings and are substantiated by: 1. Documentary evidence (household registration proof, process of arrest, seizure of items, document list and list of returned items, tools used in the crime and their identification photos, stolen property and its identification photos, site layout map); 2. Testimonies of witnesses Qiu Yilang and Zhang; 3. Victim's statement (report materials and statement from the victim Qiu Erlang); 4. Appraisal opinion (conclusion of the appraisal of the value of the items involved); 5. Inspection, examination, and investigative experiment records (on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, examination records, search records); 6. Defendants' confessions and defenses (confessions and defenses of defendants Ye and Mo), among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Mo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that starting in March 2014, the defendants, Qiu and Zhao, a married couple, provided a temporary residence on the first floor of No. 5, Lane 13, Xiangyang Road, Shangyuan Village, a certain town in a certain city, where they set up a mahjong table for others to engage in gambling by playing \"local\" mahjong, and they took a cut from the winnings. On the evening of September 25, 2014, this gambling venue was raided by the police, and participants Xu, Pan, and Qiu were apprehended. During this period, defendants Qiu and Zhao collected a total of over 6,000 yuan from the winnings, which has already been returned. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Qiu and Zhao during the trial process, and are validated by evidence including the confiscated property list, administrative penalty decision, criminal record verification, household registration certificates, testimonies from witnesses Qiu, Pan, and Xu, details of the arrest, and investigation records, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: In the early morning hours of January 13, 2018, the defendants Wang and Man rode a motorcycle to steal one white and one yellow sighthound from the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou in the Peace Cold Storage courtyard in a certain town in a certain county. The white sighthound was jointly purchased by the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou in December 2017 at a certain location for 20,000 yuan, while the yellow sighthound was purchased by Li in a certain county for 2,300 yuan and had been raised by him ever since. Later, Wang and Man sold the stolen white sighthound for 48,000 yuan to Liang in a certain city in a certain province, and the yellow sighthound for 8,000 yuan to Kang in a certain county in a certain province. To support these charges, the public prosecution agency submitted documentary evidence such as the account of the arrest, testimonies from eyewitnesses including Shi, statements from the victims Li, Ji, and Zhou, confessions and defenses from the defendants Wang and Man, as well as site surveys and identification records to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Man": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on the morning of May 21, 2017, defendants Zhang and Yu were outside Morning Wind Photo Studio on Wenhao Road in Shawan District of a certain city, where they saw the victim, Chen (referred to as Chen 1), park a black Honda SDH125-56 motorcycle (license plate number Chuan LMH2**). Zhang instructed Yu to keep watch while he carried out the theft, stealing the motorcycle and selling it for 600 RMB (currency unit same hereinafter). According to the Price Authentication Center of Shawan District, the market retail price of the stolen motorcycle on the day of the incident was 5,373 RMB. This court further found that on July 5, 2017, due to suspicious behavior, defendant Zhang was taken back to the public security bureau by patrol police from the Shawan District branch of the municipal public security bureau for investigation. A hex key socket wrench and a modified knife, which were used in the crime, were found and seized from Zhang. During the investigation, Zhang truthfully confessed the main criminal facts. On July 10 of the same year, defendant Yu voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts as well. During the court hearing, the aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants, and they are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, basic information of permanent residents, accounts of capture and arrival at the station, the vehicle registration certificate, the unified motorcycle sales invoice, identification records and photos, a list of seized items, on-site inspection records, on-site sketches and layout diagrams, on-site photos, the Price Authentication Conclusion Document No. [2017]039 from the Price Authentication Center of Shawan District, the statement of victim Chen 1, witness testimony from Chen 2, confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Yu, as well as synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogations, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: At approximately 20:40 on February 12, 2015, within the Engineering Consultation Institute on Xinhua Road, Kuiwen District, Weifang City, a conflict arose when the car of Jiang, a friend of defendants Mou and Sun, was parked in front of the car belonging to Wang, a friend of the victim Wen, preventing Wang from being able to drive away. During the process of finding Jiang to move the car, both parties got into an argument, which escalated into a physical altercation. During the altercation, defendants Mou and Sun assaulted the victim Wen, resulting in injuries to Wen's lower right limb, causing a comminuted fracture of the right fibula and a fracture at the tip of the right inner malleolus. According to the forensic assessment, Wen's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. On March 2, 2015, defendants Mou and Sun voluntarily surrendered to the Xinhua Road Police Station of the Kuiwen Sub-bureau of the Weifang Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to the crime of intentional injury. After the incident, defendants Mou and Sun compensated the victim Wen with a total of 200,000 yuan for medical expenses, lost wages, nutrition expenses, and other costs, reaching a settlement agreement, and Wen expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Mou and Sun during the court hearings, and were confirmed by evidence including documentary evidence of the arrest process, telephone inquiry records, population information, the settlement agreement, applications, receipts, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Pan, Jiang, and Yu, the victim Wen’s statement, forensic medical appraisal report on the degree of human injury, and audiovisual materials from surveillance footage at the scene of the incident, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Mou": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that from early February 2014 to March 9, Jiang and Li, the defendants, went six times to the Tesco supermarket on Ti Yu South Road, Luoxing Street, Jiashan County, and, using a child as cover, stole one kitchen knife, one Na Mei toothbrush, one SAST DVD player, one tube of Bai Yao toothpaste, two toy race cars, one Jie Li Ya towel, and one Osram LED flashlight. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen goods was over 1,400 RMB. After the crime was discovered, some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to Tesco. The prosecution also establishes that Jiang and Li, the defendants, confessed their criminal acts truthfully after being brought to justice. The defendants, Jiang and Li, did not dispute these facts during the trial. The facts are also confirmed by witness testimony from Wang, the inventory list of the stolen items, the price appraisal conclusion report, the crime scene investigation records and photos, search records and photos, identification records and photos, lists of seized and returned items, details of their capture, the administrative punishment decision document, basic population information, video materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Since November 2014, the defendant Tian obtained multiple POS machines and hired the defendants Zheng and Gong. They operated out of apartment 503, building G3, Kangju Era Residential Area, Shushan District in this city, providing others with credit card repayment or cash-out services for a fee. By May 12, 2015, the defendants Tian, Zheng, and Gong had successively provided credit card repayment or cash-out services for individuals such as Zhang and Wu, with the accumulated amount reaching 1,314,360 yuan. In support of the above charges, the prosecution read and presented the confessions and defenses of the defendants Tian, Zheng, and Gong; testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang and Wu; the location map of the crime scene; the list of seized items; promotional business cards; POS machine transaction records; identification transcripts; the process of being brought to justice; and the defendants' household registration information.", "label": {"Tian": ["Fine"], "Zheng": ["Fine"], "Gong": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was ascertained that from September 16 to September 20, 2014, defendants Shu and Liu, under the instruction of Yang (phonetically, identity unknown, handled in a separate case), collaborated with Zhang, Hu, and Gao (all names are phonetic, handled in a separate case) to detain Niu (referred to within the pyramid scheme organization as Niu A) for the purpose of coercing him into joining the pyramid scheme. They, along with Zhang, Hu, and Gao (all names are phonetic, handled in a separate case), monitored Niu, preventing him from leaving the room or contacting the outside world in an effort to force him to join the pyramid scheme. On September 18, defendants Shu, Liu, and others assaulted Niu, who still refused to join the scheme. Around 2 PM on September 20, Niu seized an opportunity while using the restroom to escape through a window, resulting in a fractured right heel bone. Defendants Shu and Liu were apprehended by law enforcement when they arrived at the scene, following reports from the public, as Shu and Liu were chasing the victim, Niu. After the incident, defendants Shu and Liu voluntarily deposited 20,000 RMB with this court as compensation for the victim, Niu. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Shu and Liu during the trial. These are corroborated by the victim Niu's statement; the recognition record and photographs of the crime location identified by the two defendants; the recognition record and photographs identifying the two defendants by the victim Niu; the photographs of the victim Niu's injuries, medical examination report, hospitalization records, and admission and discharge records; the process of the case's resolution and conclusion; proof of household registration and current behavioral status of defendants Shu and Liu, and other evidence sufficient for verification.", "label": {"Shu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of June 30, 2014, Chen contacted the defendant Huang to purchase methamphetamine (meth) worth 300 RMB. After discussing with the defendant Wang, both defendants sold approximately 0.3 grams of methamphetamine to Chen for 300 RMB under the April Sky Bar at the Cultural Square on Xin'anjiang Street in the city. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang and Huang truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Huang during the court hearing, and they are substantiated by documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, records of arrest, evidence retrieval notices, lists of evidence, bank transaction details, administrative punishment decisions, case filing decisions, and testimonies from witnesses Chen, Zou, Xu, and Qian, as well as identification records and photos, search warrants, search records, and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the evening of August 22, 2014, the defendants He and Jiang went to the entrance of Shop No. 70, Dongwan, Huitou Village, Zhangting Town, Yuyao City. Through means such as pushing and connecting wires, they stole a Qingqi brand electric bicycle valued at 1,650 RMB and a pack of Hongshuangxi cigarettes worth 56 RMB from the trunk, both belonging to the victim Gong. At around noon the following day, the defendants He and Jiang went to the entrance of Yongjie Daily Necessities Factory, Zhaoyan, Zhishan Village, Fangqiao, Yangming Street, Yuyao City. Using similar means, they stole a Lujia brand electric bicycle valued at 2,040 RMB belonging to the victim Li. On August 23, 2014, the defendants He and Jiang were apprehended by the police from the Yuyao Public Security Bureau. After the crime occurred, most of the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants He and Jiang during the trial, and there is documentary evidence from the Yuyao Public Security Bureau, including \"Arrest Process,\" decisions and inventories for evidence preservation, special receipts for temporarily seized items, lists of returned items, photo descriptions, receipts, certificates of quality, population information, criminal judgments, release certificates, criminal records, public security administrative penalty decisions, and revocations of administrative penalty decisions, statements of victims Gong and Li, identification records and photos, appraisal reports, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on December 30, 2014, at around 18:00, the defendants Feng and Liu collaborated to go to the bridge precast concrete factory at section 28 of the former Gu-Zhu Expressway, located in group 1 of a certain village. They jointly stole one low-voltage comprehensive distribution cabinet, one Huali fkga43-hlm8204 model dedicated transformer acquisition terminal, and one load control box. They later sold these as scrap to someone named Xie and received 123 yuan in stolen goods proceeds, with Feng receiving 63 yuan and Liu receiving 60 yuan. After appraisal, the stolen items were valued at 3,200 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Feng and Liu during the trial. Moreover, these facts are corroborated by: 1) the victim (owner) Yuan's statement; 2) testimonies from witnesses including Xie; 3) appraisal opinions; 4) the on-site inspection record, site map, and site photos; 5) documentary evidence such as household registration certificates and seizure lists; 6) the confessions and defenses of defendants Feng and Liu, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: On the evening of October 14, 2007, the defendants Chen and Yang, along with Chen A (already sentenced) and Dai, rented a white \"Futian\" truck from Hu in a certain city and proceeded to a village at the Yangtze River Office in another city. There, they stole over 220 meters of all-plastic chromatographic telephone communication cables valued at 19,606 RMB. Chen A and others were caught by the public security authorities during the transport of the stolen goods, and the entire haul was seized on the spot. Defendant Chen took the opportunity to escape. On May 30, 2014, defendant Chen was arrested and brought to justice by the public security authorities. On November 25, 2011, defendant Yang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Yang during the trial, and are corroborated by the confessions of accomplices, witness testimonies, expert opinions, on-site investigation records, the list of seized items, the process of how they were brought to justice, and related documentary evidence, as well as the confessions and defenses of the two defendants, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At approximately 8:00 PM on June 16, 2016, the defendants, Wang and Jian, were riding a motorcycle with the license plate number ZheBYLXXX to the entrance of a certain number on Linxi Road, Xiaolin Town, Cixi City. They took advantage of the victim, Lu Moujie, who was walking to that location and, using a method of snatching while riding, grabbed an iPhone 6 (valued at 1,950 RMB) from Lu Moujie's hand. Wang then drove the vehicle away to flee. Subsequently, the defendant Jian sold the phone and received 1,000 RMB. After being apprehended, the defendant Jian truthfully confessed the above criminal facts. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned. The prosecution submitted relevant evidence to the court to prove the above facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that around 6 p.m. on March 27, 2017, the defendant Li was riding a motorcycle on the non-motorized lane opposite the south gate of Yudaihe Community in a certain district of a certain city and got into a verbal altercation with a car driver named Cai over driving issues. Subsequently, defendant Li called defendants Dong and Hu to inform them that he was in a conflict with others at the aforementioned location. Thereafter, defendants Dong, Zhang, Zhuang, and Li A (deceased) traveled in a vehicle driven by defendant Hu to the vicinity of Yudaihe Community, where they got out. Defendant Dong, carrying a vehicle-mounted fire extinguisher, and defendants Hu, Zhuang, Zhang, and others, armed with wooden sticks, met up with defendant Li. Together, they used wooden sticks and a fire extinguisher to assault the victim Cai and others, causing an injury to the victim Cai's head. The injury was appraised as slight. On March 28, 2017, December 29, 2018, and January 13, 2019, defendants Li, Hu, Zhang, and Zhuang voluntarily surrendered to the police; on August 20, 2018, defendant Dong was apprehended by the police. After the incident, defendants Li and others compensated the victim Cai for his losses and obtained his forgiveness. It was also found that defendants Li, Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang voluntarily admitted guilt and accepted punishment. The public prosecution recommended sentencing defendant Li to imprisonment for eight months to one year and six months; defendants Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang to imprisonment for six months to one year and four months. These facts were acknowledged by defendants Li, Dong, Hu, Zhuang, and Zhang during the trial, and are substantiated by the victim Cai's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang and Wang, the criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, explanatory documents, forensic medical appraisal opinion on the extent of physical injury, and other evidence, providing sufficient basis for conviction.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from 13:00 to 16:00 on September 21, 2019, the defendants Huang and Tian (handled in a separate case) invited the defendant Sun to use an air gun to shoot birds. Subsequently, Sun drove a Zhonghua SUV with the license plate number E N×××××, illegally hunting 2 mallard ducks, 1 spotted-necked dove, and 1 great snipe with an air gun on a certain section from a village in a town in a certain city to another town in the same city. On September 22, 2019, the city wildlife protection station identified these birds as terrestrial wildlife under national protection and prohibited from hunting by the province.", "label": {"Huang": ["Fine"], "Sun": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that between December 2010 and January 2011 of the lunar calendar, the defendants He, Chi, and Huang, along with Yang (already sentenced) and others, set up gambling dens at locations such as Room xxx, Unit x, Building x, Yangguang Community, Anyang Street, City A, and Room xxx, Unit x, Building x, Nanmao Community, Xincheng Street, City A. They organized gambling activities involving Lin and others in the form of playing soft and hard Xincheng Mahjong. Yang was responsible for collecting the rake-off, while the defendant Zhang was in charge of bookkeeping. The gambling dens operated for about fifteen days, accumulating more than 30,000 yuan in rake-off. On February 21 and March 17, 2014, defendants He and Zhang turned themselves into the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their crimes. These facts were not disputed by defendants He, Chi, Huang, and Zhang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Lin, and Xie, as well as by the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the account of the arrest, and basic personal information, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Luohu District in [City Name] charged that on April 1, 2015, at around 16:00, Li Mouqian contacted the defendant Liang via WeChat and phone to purchase drugs worth 500 RMB. The defendant Liang then got in touch with \"A Moumou\" (handled in a separate case) and arranged for a drug deal between \"A Moumou\" and Li Mouqian through Liang’s mediation in the vicinity of [City Name] ****. Subsequently, Li Mouqian contacted the defendant Liang again, requesting to increase the amount of drugs to 1,000 RMB. The defendant Liang then contacted \"A Moumou\" to provide drugs worth 1,000 RMB, which \"A Moumou\" agreed to, and they set the drug transaction to take place at the McDonald's across from **** Department Store on ** Road in Luohu District. Liang informed Li Mouqian to go to the aforementioned location to meet with \"A Moumou\" for the drug transaction. \"A Moumou\" arrived at the agreed location earlier and requested to conduct the drug deal with defendant Liang first. However, defendant Liang did not have enough cash on him at the time, so he informed his companion, defendant Xu, of the drug mediation situation and asked him for a loan of 1,000 RMB to advance the drug payment. Defendant Xu then loaned 1,000 RMB to defendant Liang. After meeting with \"A Moumou,\" defendant Liang used the 1,000 RMB borrowed from defendant Xu to purchase two packets of drugs from \"A Moumou.\" After the transaction, \"A Moumou\" fled the scene. Afterwards, defendant Liang met with Li Mouqian at the entrance of McDonald's and completed the drug deal. After receiving the drug payment of 1,000 RMB from Li Mouqian, defendant Liang returned the money to defendant Xu. After the transaction, police arrested defendants Liang and Xu at the scene and confiscated the drug money of 1,000 RMB from defendant Xu and two packets of drugs from Li Mouqian. Upon examination, the two packets of drugs were found to weigh 4.56 grams and 4.89 grams, respectively, and tested positive for ketamine.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Nanshan District, a certain city, charged: Between December 2013 and January 2014, defendants Li, Luo, and Huang, knowing that Cai B, Cao, and 73 others did not meet the criteria to apply for the Ping An Bank Business Card Loan, provided false and forged materials related to the Wangsheng Home Furnishing and Building Materials Plaza in a certain city for Cai B, Cao, and 73 others to apply for a credit line of RMB 100,000 \"Ping An Business Card\" at the Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Branch of Ping An Bank, and collected referral fees. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the process of apprehension, Li's voluntary surrender statement and letter of repentance, identification materials of the defendants Li, Luo, and Huang, evidence collection notices, lists of received evidence materials, explanations, the Ping An Bank Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town Branch's report materials, company materials and power of attorney, Li's notice of denial of bail, materials regarding Luo's and Huang's bail, case acceptance registration forms, decision to file a case, testimonies from witnesses Deng, Li B, Hong, Li A, Huang A, Cai A, Liu, and Chen, the victim unit Ping An Bank Overseas Chinese Town Branch's report materials, Nanshan District Public Security Judicial (Nan) Examination (Document Inspection) [2014] No. 3221 \"Appraisal Report\", and the confessions and defense statements of defendants Li, Luo, and Huang.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charged: On the evening of February 20, 2016, defendants Zhu, Liu, in collaboration with Wang (at large), gambled with the victim, Yu, at the rented room of Li at No. 75, 1-1, Huafeng New Village, a district in this city. They engaged in gambling by playing \"Xiao Jiu\". During the session, the victim, Yu, lost money and accumulated a gambling debt of 20,000 yuan owed to Zhu and others. After the gambling ended, Zhu and others demanded repayment of the gambling debt from Yu, but Yu was unable to repay it. At around 3 a.m. the next day, defendant Zhu contacted defendant Chen and, together with Liu and Wang, took the victim Yu to Chen's location at Chengqian Decoration Co., Ltd. in Changqing Creative Park, to continue demanding repayment of the debt. During this period, Zhu coerced Yu into signing a loan contract for 20,000 yuan, employing threats and physical assault to force repayment. At around 10 a.m., Zhu, Liu, Chen, and Wang took Yu to the Hainabaichuan Bathhouse on Shixiang Road in a certain district. After Yu placed his clothing and personal belongings in a locker, they confiscated his locker key and continued to demand repayment of the debt. At about 5 p.m., Yu's father, upon hearing the news, arrived at the bathhouse and reported to the police. Defendant Chen was subsequently taken into custody on-site by police officers. On March 14 of the same year, defendants Zhu and Liu voluntarily surrendered to the police. After their apprehension, all three defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Zhu, Liu, and Chen raised no objections to these facts, which were corroborated by the victim Yu's statements, the testimonies of witnesses Lu and Li, the confiscation decision letter, confiscation records, confiscation inventory, evidence preservation decision letter, evidence preservation inventory, records and photographs of physical injuries, diagnostic conclusions, surveillance footage, household registration certificates, the process of apprehension, statements from co-defendant Wang, and confessions from defendants Zhu, Liu, and Chen, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province, charged: On June 11, 2015, at approximately 1:30 pm, the defendant Wang, after drinking, drove a Toyota SUV with the license plate number E××××× near Zhongda Street in Haizhou District, where he collided with a car driven by the victim, Liu. Wang attempted to flee but was stopped by Liu and others. Subsequently, the defendant Wang gathered defendant Xu and others to assault the victims Liu, Lu, and Qi, resulting in multiple soft tissue injuries on the victims' bodies, which were assessed as minor injuries. On July 16, 2015, the defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered to the Haizhou Branch of a city's Public Security Bureau. It was also found that defendants Xu and Wang's close relatives voluntarily compensated the victims Liu, Lu, and Qi for their losses after the incident, obtaining forgiveness from the three victims. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Wang and Xu during the trial and are supported by household registration certificates, compensation agreements, letters of forgiveness, call records, the investigation process of the case, the process of capture, written testimonies of absent witnesses Han and Liu, statements of victims Liu, Lu, and Qi, pre-trial confessions and defenses by defendants Wang and Xu, forensic identification documents of the degree of physical injury issued by the Municipal Public Security Bureau's forensic identification office (clinical) numbered (2015) 765, 766, 767, identification transcripts, audio-visual materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts. Regarding the defense opinion presented by defendant Wang's counsel that Wang was a first-time and occasional offender, had circumstances of voluntary surrender, and compensated the victims for their losses and obtained their forgiveness, this court finds it consistent with the facts and adopts it in accordance with the law. Regarding the defense opinion presented by defendant Xu's counsel that Xu had a good attitude toward confession, actively compensated the victims for their losses, and obtained their forgiveness, this court finds it consistent with the facts and adopts it in accordance with the law. Regarding the sentencing opinion presented by the defense for defendants Wang and Xu recommending the application of probation to both defendants, this court, after considering all circumstances of the case, does not accept it in accordance with the law.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained that: 1. Around 5 a.m. on August 29, 2015, the defendant Fan, together with Qiu and Zhang, stole 3,700 yuan in cash from Liu at a Green Net Internet cafe located at a city bus station. Fan received 1,800 yuan of the stolen money, Qiu received 800 yuan, Zhang received 1,000 yuan, and the remaining 100 yuan was squandered by the three. 2. Around 5 a.m. on November 18, 2015, the defendant Fan, together with Zhang, stole a ring, mobile phone, and other items from Lyu at a Green Net Internet cafe at a city bus station. Appraisal showed that the stolen phone and ring belonging to Lyu were valued at 1,732 yuan. On August 29 and November 18, 2015, the defendants Fan and Qiu, together with Zhang (who is being dealt with in a separate case), stole 3,700 yuan in cash from Liu and a ring and mobile phone valued at 1,730 yuan from Lyu, respectively, at a Green Net Internet cafe at a city bus station. On November 26, 2015, the defendant Qiu surrendered to the Xicheng Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau. On November 23, 2015, Fan compensated the victim Liu with 3,700 yuan and received forgiveness. On November 18, 2015, the Xicheng Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau recovered the stolen phone, ring, and other items and returned them to the victim Lyu. On December 9 of the same year, Fan compensated the victim Lyu with 200 yuan and received forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhang, the statements of victims Liu and Lyu, photographs of the stolen items, seizure lists, household registration certificates, details of the arrest, appraisal opinions from the city Price Certification Center, interrogation videos, and other evidence.", "label": {"Fan": ["Fine"], "Qiu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged: 1. On July 29 and 30, 2020, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu, after prior conspiracy, went twice to the Zhong'ang Langyue construction site in Fenghuang Town, a certain city. Yu and Zhang entered the site through a hole in the wall and stole by manually carrying items while Xu was on lookout outside. They stole leftover paint buckets, scrap rebar, and other items, selling them for a total of 750 RMB. 2. On the morning of July 31, 2020, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu, after prior conspiracy, executed the theft in the same manner at the same location. Zhang was apprehended before he could leave, and two bags of scrap iron valued at 115.6 RMB were seized at the scene. After being brought to justice, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu all confessed to the above criminal facts. On September 17, 2020, in the presence of a duty lawyer, defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu voluntarily signed a plea agreement, expressing acknowledgment of their crime and willingness to accept punishment. It is recommended that defendant Yu be sentenced to two months and ten days of detention and fined 1,000 RMB; defendant Zhang to two months and ten days of detention and fined 1,000 RMB; and defendant Xu to two months of detention and fined 1,000 RMB. Defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu have no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations and have signed in agreement. This is corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Tang, and Tong, identification records, evidence preservation lists, seizure lists, weight records, return lists, relevant photos, price assessment opinions, the process of the case being solved and arrests made, population information, administrative punishment decisions, as well as the confessions of defendants Yu, Zhang, and Xu. This court hereby confirms these facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area alleges that at about 21:00 on May 3, 2014, the defendant Han went to Jete Sand Factory in Shentang Village, Maxi Township, where he had an argument with the defendant Cao, who was working there, over trivial matters. Subsequently, they physically assaulted each other, resulting in various injuries to each other's shoulders and heads. According to an assessment by the Wenshui County Forensic Center, Cao sustained minor injuries to the left shoulder, and Han sustained minor injuries to the head. After the incident, both parties reached a civil compensation agreement and mutually forgave each other. It is believed that the actions of the two defendants violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally liable for X crime. Relevant evidence has been provided. Both defendants have no objections to the criminal facts and charges brought by the prosecution and voluntarily pleaded guilty. After the trial, it was found that at about 21:00 on May 3, 2014, the defendant Han went to Jete Sand Factory in Shentang Village, Maxi Township, where he had an argument with the defendant Cao, who was working there, over trivial matters. Subsequently, they physically assaulted each other, resulting in various degrees of injury to Cao's shoulder and Han's head. According to an assessment by the Wenshui County Forensic Center, Cao sustained minor injuries to the left shoulder, and Han sustained minor injuries to the head. After the incident, both parties reached a civil compensation agreement and mutually forgave each other. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Han and Cao during the trial. In addition, the report materials and confessions of the defendants Han and Cao, the testimony of the witness Qu, the site diagram and photos, the forensic appraisal by Wenshui Public Security Bureau, resident population information, compensation agreement, and letter of forgiveness, among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on March 15, 2018, the defendant Wu and the victim Xiang had a verbal altercation at work. At about 8:00 p.m. that day, Wu, together with defendants Li, Zhu, and Huo, followed Xiang to the bicycle parking area outside the Xin Donghai Hardware & Electrical Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd., located on Fuwan Industrial Road, Hecheng Street, in a certain district of a certain city, and assaulted Xiang. During the incident, all four individuals kicked Xiang, Zhu struck Xiang's thigh with an aluminum pipe, and Li lifted a bicycle and hit Xiang's body two or three times. The four fled the scene when a security guard intervened. On March 19, 2018, Wu and Li turned themselves in to the police. Forensic evaluation determined that Xiang's injuries were of a minor level, second degree. In court, the prosecution presented evidence including confessions from defendants Zhu, Wu, Li, Huo, the victim Xiang's statement, testimony from witness Zhang, identification records, forensic reports, crime scene investigation records, certification from the Criminal Investigation Brigade of the Teng County Public Security Bureau in Guangxi, a situational statement from the Xijiang Police Station of the Gaoming Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, household registration certificates, arrest records, and statements of how the defendants were brought to justice.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Huo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The local People's Procuratorate accused: Since July 2010, defendant Yu, for profit-making purposes, without the permission of the \"HIGHLY\" trademark owner Shanghai Hitachi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd., employed defendant Chang as production supervisor in a factory building of Gu Tongyi Tea Factory in a village of Chaicheng Street, this district. They purchased old air-conditioning compressors from other places for modification and refurbishment, and bought counterfeit \"HIGHLY\" trademarks from Hangzhou Dongyin Printing Co., Ltd., which were then affixed to the modified compressors for sale, with sales amounting to RMB 113,950. On May 9, 2011, the Beilun Public Security Sub-bureau, together with the Beilun Branch of the Ningbo Administration for Industry and Commerce, inspected the factory building and seized 138 compressors labeled with counterfeit \"HIGHLY\" trademarks (valued at RMB 38,190) and 500 counterfeit \"HIGHLY\" trademarks. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution agency provided evidence to the court, including witness testimony, delivery notes, dispatch notes, and the trademark registration certificate of Shanghai Hitachi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it has been found that at around 11 PM on May 4, 2015, the defendants Xu and Wu, along with Xu Jia (who has been sentenced in a separate case), after drinking, went to the entrance of the \"Wenzhou Chuanyang Electrical Appliance Factory,\" where they worked, located at No. 12 Huacheng Road, Xinfeng Village, Xianyan Street, Ouhai District, Wenzhou City, and created a loud disturbance. They ignored the advice of the factory staff, including the victims Tan, Hu, and others, and kicked and damaged the factory's gate system before forcibly entering the factory. They smashed property in the security room and, without reason, assaulted the victims Tan, Hu, Tang, Sun, and others. They also smashed the second-floor dormitory door and victim Zhou's laptop inside the factory. According to an evaluation, the injuries of victims Tan, Hu, Tang, and Sun were all classified as minor injuries; the damage to the gate system and the laptop was valued at a total of 4,549 yuan. After the incident, the family of defendant Xu and Xu Jia compensated the affected unit a total of 13,750 yuan for the property damage. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Wu during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the confession of Xu Jia, the statements of the victims Tan, Hu, Tang, Sun, and Zhou, the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Qian Jia, Wang, Qian Yi, Liu, and Xie, the on-site investigation records, original body injury records, evidence collection notices, forensic medical reports on the degree of human injury, price evaluation opinions, agreements, receipts, reports, video situation explanations, arrest records, population information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From October 2016 to March 2017, defendants Geng and Luo, for the purpose of making a profit, repeatedly organized others to engage in gambling by playing \"Niu Niu\" with poker cards and \"Tongzigong\" with mahjong tiles at various locations, such as Room x, Unit 2, Building 21, Yuhang Road, Yuhang Street, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, and the auxiliary house at No. y Banlu Pavilion, Xita Village, and the south house at No. z Dongtang Temple, Xita Village. They gained over 24,000 yuan in profit through these activities. The supporting evidence for these charges includes documentary evidence; witness testimonies; identification records; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Geng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 1 a.m. on November 10, 2013, defendants Tan and Gao had a dispute with Peng over trivial matters in Room 810 at the Jinmao KTV first bridge in the district. Subsequently, they assaulted the victim, Peng, at the entrance of the eighth-floor elevator, and were later separated. The two defendants then rushed to the entrance on the first floor and again assaulted the victim, Peng, who was about to leave by taxi, causing him minor injuries. According to the forensic assessment, the victim, Peng, suffered multiple nasal bone fractures, a 0.5 cm sutured wound on the face, and facial skin and soft tissue injuries, which were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendant Gao was apprehended by the police from the Wuma Police Station at around 11 a.m. on December 17, 2013, at the temporary residence at No. 2, Lane 78, Shuixin Residential Area. Gao then persuaded defendant Tan to surrender through a text message. After receiving the message, defendant Tan proactively contacted the public security authorities and voluntarily surrendered to the Wuma Police Station the following day. The two defendants and the victim, Peng, reached a reconciliation agreement, compensating the victim for economic losses totaling 80,000 RMB, which has been fulfilled, and the victim expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The facts mentioned above are not disputed by the defendants during the court trial and are confirmed by the victim Peng's statement, testimonies from witnesses Cai, Hua, and Sun, identification records, photos of injuries and text messages, forensic medical injury assessment report, mediation agreement, receipt, report, account of the case process, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that the defendants Zhu and Gong joined Zhonglü Biological Technology Co., Ltd. in the second half of 2013 in a certain city of a certain province. The company had no products and operated under the guise of selling Kangfude brand Yizhen capsules. It used a pyramid scheme to recruit and develop a downline, directly or indirectly basing rebates on the number of people developed, enticing participants to recruit others, thereby defrauding them of money. The organization had five levels: salesperson, team leader, director, section chief, and manager. Purchasing or selling 1-2 sets of products qualified one as a salesperson, 3-9 sets as a team leader, 10-64 sets as a director, 65-392 sets as a section chief, and 393 or more sets as a manager. After joining by purchasing products, defendants Zhu and Gong each recruited several relatives and friends. By 2014, defendants Zhu and Gong had entered the management level of the organization in the city; Zhu was at the second level as a section chief, responsible for contacting and assisting the general support Lei Moujia (at large) and managing dormitories, while Gong was at the third level as a director, responsible for managing dormitory personnel, organizing daily activities and lectures. In the second half of 2015, defendants Zhu and Gong respectively withdrew from the organization. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhu and Gong during the trial, and there are confessions from co-defendants Wang, Fan, Lei Mouyi, Zhang, and others, identification records of mutual recognition between the defendants and co-defendants, written proof of the capture of defendants Zhu and Gong by the public security agency, as well as the household registration certificates of the two defendants. Additionally, there are the court's criminal judgment document No. (2016) Ji 0684 Xingchu 43 and the Baoding Intermediate People's Court criminal ruling document No. (2016) Ji 06 Xingzhong 291, confirming that co-defendants Lei Mouyi, Fan, Wang, Zhang, Hu, and others were convicted of x crime and sentenced, which is sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On June 10, 2014, the defendants Yuan and Ye conspired in advance to steal stones. At about 11 p.m. that evening, defendant Ye drove a green pickup truck with the license plate j××××× provided by Yuan to the side of a road in a village near the cemetery in a certain area, where they stole 6 bluestones from the ancestral grave of the victim Xie Bing. Later, they used the pickup truck to transport the stolen bluestones to a certain county where they were handed over to Yuan for safekeeping. After the fact, defendant Yuan transferred and hid the 6 bluestones at the residence of Kong in a village in a certain town in a certain province. On August 19, 2014, police officers from the county public security bureau, with the assistance of defendant Yuan, arrested defendant Ye near a hotel in a certain county, and, under Yuan's guidance, recovered the 6 stolen bluestones. According to the appraisal, the stolen bluestones were valued at 16,000 RMB. On September 10, 2014, defendant Yuan's family compensated the victim Xie Bing with 80,000 RMB and received the victim's understanding. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ye and Yuan during the court trial, and are supported by statements and photographs, seizure documents, search records and photographs, return lists, household registration certificates, criminal record check forms, criminal judgments, administrative penalty decisions, compensation agreements, letters of understanding, evidence collection notifications, proofs; testimonies from witnesses such as Kong, Xie Jia, Xie Yi, and others regarding the capture process; statements from the victim Xie Bing; confessions and defenses from defendants Ye and Yuan; appraisal opinions, on-site inspection records and photographs, and a CD, which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Chuanying District in a certain city charges that the defendants, Song and Zhang (who are husband and wife), on January 25, 2014, despite being aware of their inability to repay substantial debts and having already transferred their own home at Unit 1, Floor 3, Room 3, Building 19a, Yatai Xincheng, to Zhang Moumou and delivered it, forged a purchase contract for the said house as collateral to fraudulently secure a loan of 400,000 RMB from the Wealth Credit Company in a certain city. Between May 2013 and April 2014, defendant Song, knowing their inability to repay, continued to use the property at Unit 1, Floor 3, Room 3, Building 19a, Yatai Xincheng, as collateral to alleviate debts and defrauded a victim of 780,000 RMB. Between June 2013 and April 2014, defendant Song, knowing their inability to repay, continued to use the aforementioned property as collateral to alleviate debts and defrauded the victim Zhang No. 2 of 620,000 RMB. After the case was uncovered, Song and Zhang were apprehended by the public security authorities. To substantiate the above accusations, the Public Prosecution provided in-court evidence including confessions from the defendants Song and Zhang, statements from victims Wei Moumou, Zhang No. 1, and Zhang No. 2, testimonies from witnesses Xie Mou, Sun Mou, Song Moumou, Wang Moumou, Yin Moumou, and Zhang Moumou, as well as documentation of the arrest and case solving process, the household registration form, fugitive registration form, situation description, loan contract, commercial housing sale contract, IOUs, housing sale agreement, individual business license, home purchase invoice, receipt, transfer agreement, house rental contract, house mortgage loan contract, real estate mortgage registration cancellation application form from a certain city, bank account details, and other evidence.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 9 a.m. on November 14, 2016, the defendants Yu and Qian conspired under the pretense of distributing Buddhist postings to leaders and selling Buddhist statues to go to the third-floor general office of the Ji'an County Human Resources and Social Security Bureau with the intent to steal. Defendant Yu, taking advantage of the staff's inattention, stole 2,240 RMB in cash from a briefcase belonging to the victim Xiao in another office on the same floor. After returning to the general office, fearing detection, Yu hid the stolen cash on a computer host and then fled with defendant Qian. Defendant Qian was captured on the spot by the staff of the Ji'an County Human Resources and Social Security Bureau and handed over to the police. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Yu and Qian during the trial and are substantiated by evidence including residential information, details of the arrest, proof of criminal record, a list of confiscated and returned items, identification records, audiovisual materials, the victim Xiao's statement, witness testimonies from Zhu and Zhong, as well as the defendants Yu and Qian's confessions and defenses, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 9 p.m. on June 20, 2020, the defendants Liu, Chen, and Lu went to a construction site managed by a person named Liu, located approximately 100 meters south of a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of the site being unattended, they stole 11 high-voltage cables worth 4,191 yuan. After the incident, the stolen cables were recovered and returned to the victim, Liu. The defendants Chen, Liu, and Lu have received the victim's understanding and forgiveness.", "label": {"Liu": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"], "Lu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: On July 8, 2014, around 18:00, defendants Zhou, Liu, and Li went to the No. 9 bus stop at the central passenger station in Huangshi Port District to look for an opportunity to pickpocket. Defendant Liu noticed the victim, Shi, was about to board the No. 9 bus after making a phone call, and signaled defendant Zhou to coordinate. Defendant Zhou intentionally got on the bus ahead of victim Shi and stood at the front door, using his body to block Shi's way, preventing Shi from moving forward. Seizing this opportunity, defendant Liu pickpocketed a white \"iPhone 5\" from victim Shi's shoulder bag. When Shi immediately noticed the phone had been stolen, he apprehended defendant Zhou and called the police. Defendants Liu and Li escaped, later selling the stolen phone for 1,100 yuan and squandered the money. According to the price appraisal center of the city, the stolen phone was valued at 2,660 yuan. Additionally, it was found that on July 30, 2014, defendant Li, after contacting police through another person, waited at home to be taken into custody and truthfully confessed to the crime. He proactively assisted police in apprehending co-defendant Liu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the court hearing and were corroborated by the testimony of victim Shi, as well as documentary evidence including the arrest process, household registration certificate, identification records, criminal judgment, decision not to prosecute, the price appraisal opinion from the city's appraisal center, and the confessions of the three defendants at the police station. The evidence is credible, ample, and sufficient to confirm the conviction.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that from mid-October 2014 to October 30 of the same year, Chen and Zhang A (both already sentenced) opened a \"Baccarat\" casino at the No. 2 Pond Farmhouse Restaurant near the Oil Station in Longzihu District, Bengbu City. Among them, the defendant Wang was responsible for keeping watch outside the casino, and the defendant Jiang was responsible for dealing cards and settling chips for the participants inside the casino. In support of the above charges, the public prosecution agency provided primary evidence such as documentary evidence, confessions of the defendants, and witness testimonies.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the afternoon of January 27, 2014, defendants Chen and Ren went to the village committee courtyard of Xijiao Village, Ljiang Street, a certain city. Out of jealousy towards wealthy people driving BMW cars, they used stones to scratch the body of the BMW car belonging to the victim, Han Jie, with license plate number Zhe B×××××, which was parked in the courtyard. They scratched the left front and rear parts, as well as the front and rear fenders of the car. According to the appraisal, the damage to the vehicle amounted to 2,400 RMB. On January 28, 2014, defendants Chen and Ren were apprehended by police officers from a certain city's public security bureau. After the incident, defendants Chen and Ren compensated the victim, Han, for the losses and obtained his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Ren during the court hearing, and are supported by evidence such as documentary photos, explanations of the situation, vehicle information, administrative penalty decision letters, cancellation of public security administrative penalty decision letters, a letter of forgiveness, unit proof, \"arrest process\" records, identity information, the victim Han's statement, price appraisal opinion, and surveillance video CDs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on August 29, 2014, at approximately 2:40 a.m., Li Mou C, together with Liu Mou C, Liu Mou A, Zhang Mou C, and others, were waiting for a valet to retrieve their car in front of the 8-Carat Music Club on Dongjie Street, Qiaoxi District, Xingtai City, when a dispute arose with the club staff, leading to a physical altercation. Defendants Jin, Wei, Jia, and others stepped forward to help, collectively assaulting Li Mou C, Liu Mou C, and Zhang Mou C, resulting in their injuries, and damaged the Jinbei brand minivan and Zhonghua brand sedan driven by Liu Mou C and others. According to the assessment, Li Mou C sustained facial injuries and orbital wall fractures, classified as minor injuries level one, and transverse process fractures, frontal bone fractures, and maxillary sinus anterior wall fractures, classified as minor injuries level two. Liu Mou C and Zhang Mou C sustained minor injuries. The total damage to the wrecked vehicles amounted to 1,933 RMB. After the incident, the defendants compensated the victims for their losses and obtained forgiveness. Defendants Jin, Wei, Jia surrendered to the police on December 11, 2014, March 16, 2016, and December 16, 2014, respectively. During the trial, the three defendants did not object to the facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victims Li Mou C, Liu Mou C, Zhang Mou C, testimonies of witnesses Liu Mou A, Cao Mou, Zhang Mou A, Wen Mou, Hou Mou, Li Mou A, Jiang Mou, Wang Mou A, Chen Mou, Hu Mou, Wang Mou B, Shi Mou, Zhang Mou B, Liu Mou B, Lu Mou, Qin Mou, Li Mou B, forensic injury examination and evaluation reports, price evaluation conclusion, notification list of retrieved surveillance video, receipts, case documentation, mediation agreements, and letters of forgiveness, providing sufficient grounds for recognition.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the afternoon of May 7, 2016, the defendants Wen and Li, after prior collusion, drove to Unit 4, Room 507 at No. 699 Zhongshan Road, Yuelin Street in this city. Defendant Li kept watch downstairs while defendant Wen used a lock-picking tool to unlock and enter the premises, stealing from victim Zhou two cartons of Zhonghua cigarettes (soft pack 329), 15 packs of White Sand and Tianxia cigarettes, one carton of Golden Leaf cigarettes, 38 packs of cigarettes from a certain place (unable to assess the value due to lack of physical items), two packs of Liqun cigarettes (patterned leisure type), a gold necklace (unable to assess the value due to lack of physical item), and 400 yuan in cash, with the total value of items amounting to 4,200 yuan. On May 17, 2016, based on video investigation leads, police officers summoned defendants Wen and Li to the case at the Jintang Holiday Hotel in Anji County, Huzhou City. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wen and Li during the trial of this case. They are corroborated by the statements of victim Zhou, the testimony of witness Wei, population information tables, case processing records, criminal judgment and release registration forms, seizure orders, video investigation reports, T-shaped lock-picking tools, explanation letters, site identification records and photos, on-site inspection and examination records and photos, identification records and photos, and search records, which are sufficient for confirmation. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution recommends sentencing defendant Wen to nine to eleven months of imprisonment and imposing a fine; it recommends sentencing defendant Li to six to eight months of imprisonment and imposing a fine.", "label": {"Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the High-tech Industrial Development Zone somewhere charges: At around 22:40 on September 12, 2015, in Room V05 on the second floor of Xin Yidu Music Club in the High-tech Zone of a certain place, defendants Li and Lin had a fight with the victim Feng due to trivial matters. During the altercation, defendants Li and Lin struck Feng in the face, resulting in a nasal bone fracture for Feng. According to a forensic medical examination, the injuries sustained by the victim Feng constitute minor injuries of the second degree.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged: On the evening of September 20, 2013, the defendants Feng and Xue met the victim Wu at the Sun International Nightclub in a certain district of a certain city. On the morning of September 21, 2013, defendant Feng called the victim Wu and invited him to have a meal at Shenyun Restaurant on Dongmen North Road in a certain district of a certain city. Subsequently, defendant Feng discussed with defendant Xue to deceive Wu to borrow his phone under the pretense of making a call, and after succeeding, the two divided the stolen goods. At around 12:00 on the same day, defendant Xue, posing as a friend of defendant Feng, met victim Wu at a bus stop near Shenyun Restaurant and brought Wu to private room No. 2 at Shenyun Restaurant. Defendant Feng then called Wu from outside the restaurant, falsely claiming he would be late and asked Wu to hand the phone to defendant Xue to answer. Defendant Xue took Wu's iPhone 5, pretended to talk on the phone, and walked out of the room, seizing the opportunity to leave the restaurant. After meeting on the road opposite the restaurant, defendants Feng and Xue fled the scene with the stolen goods and later sold the phone for 1,800 RMB, which they split equally. The victim Wu, realizing he was deceived, reported the incident to the public security authorities on the same day. On December 5, 2013, the police apprehended defendants Feng and Xue on the roadside of Songgang Lougang Avenue in a certain district of a certain city. An appraisal determined that the value of the involved phone was 4,894 RMB. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: phone records, details of apprehension, identity information of the defendants, and records of prior offenses; 2. Victim's statement: statement by Wu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses by Feng and Xue; 4. Appraisal opinion: \"Appraisal Document\" and \"Appraisal Conclusion Notice\"; 5. On-site inspection, examination records: on-site inspection records and photographs; 6. Audiovisual materials: surveillance video and screenshots.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on January 12, 2016, the defendants Ze and Geng, in collaboration with another individual named Pu (currently at large), conspired to steal a motor vehicle in a certain city. On the evening of the same day, the three drove a BYD FO car (license plate: Chuan U855**) from a certain county to the urban area of a certain city to locate a target for their crime. When they reached the roadside near the People's Court of a certain city, they found a BYD FO car (license plate: Chuan UN23**) parked on the ramp to the left of the People's Court entrance, which they subsequently stole and drove to a certain county. According to the appraisal by the Certification Center of the city's Development and Reform Bureau, the stolen vehicle was valued at 11,666 RMB. On January 14, 2016, the defendant Geng was captured by the public security organs; on October 20, 2016, the defendant Ze was captured by the public security organs. The People's Procuratorate of a certain city submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, and transcripts of inspections, examinations, and identifications as evidence to support the aforementioned charges.", "label": {"Ze": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Geng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the indictment by a certain local People's Procuratorate, defendants Yu and Yang, under the instruction of Li, a shareholder of Hongxiu Company (already convicted), were on standby in their car at the gate of Jinsedy Gold Company on Xiongchu Avenue in this city around midnight on May 29, 2012. They were instructed to track Yin, an employee of Jinsedy Gold Company who had conflicts with Li. At around 1 a.m., defendants Yu and Yang saw Yin leaving with a companion, Sheng A, and proceeded to follow them by car to near the Wuguo Dormitory in the Wuchang District of the city. They reported the whereabouts of Yin and the others to Li by phone. Li then led Xiong, Lu, Zheng, Dong, Wan, Liu, Qiu, Zhou (all already convicted), and Fang (handled in a separate case) to the scene, where they assaulted Yin and Sheng A with pickaxe handles, machetes, and other weapons. This resulted in Sheng A's death due to traumatic severe cranio-cerebral injury and Yin suffering a subdural hematoma in the left frontal-temporal region due to trauma. The injuries of Yin were identified as severe upon evaluation. Defendant Yang was later apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Yu surrendered to the public security organs on September 29, 2014. To substantiate these facts, the prosecution provided evidence including: 1. The arrest and case-solving reports issued by the public security organs; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Sheng and Wang; 3. Confessions of accomplices Li, Xiong, Lu, Zheng, Dong, Wan, Liu, Qiu, and Zhou; 4. Statement from victim Yin; 5. Evaluation opinion: forensic evaluation report; 6. Criminal judgment document; 7. Confessions of defendants Yu and Yang, among other evidence.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from the early morning to the evening of December 18, 2015, the defendant Yin, due to an economic dispute, conspired with the defendants Yang, Feng, and Ji to restrain and deprive Huang of personal freedom at locations such as the 99 Crown Chain Hotel and Qingtin Tea House in Yangshe Town, Zhangjiagang City. From the early morning of December 19, 2015, to the afternoon of December 20, 2015, the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji continued to restrain and deprive Huang of personal freedom at locations including Fengshuo Tea House, the 99 Crown Chain Hotel in Yangshe Town, Zhangjiagang City, and Qingtin Tea House. After being brought to justice, defendants Yin and Feng truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Huang's statement and testimonies from witnesses Hui, Xu, Zhou1, Zhou2, and Zhao. The evidence also includes identification records, case developments, arrest records, bank transaction records, purchase slips, WeChat screenshots, seizure records and lists, retrieval records, WeChat chat logs, return lists, hotel check-in records, police dispatching logs, population information, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgments, and confessions from the defendants Yin, Yang, Feng, and Ji, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Detention"], "Yang": ["Detention"], "Feng": ["Detention"], "Ji": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Lucheng District, a certain city, accused Zhang and Lin of being directed by others, from November 23 to 26, 2013, to drive a rented vehicle carrying \"pseudo base station\" equipment within the city. They sent advertisement text messages containing gambling website content to unspecified telecom users, disrupting normal telecom users' network access and affecting their regular communication, sending a total of 29,579 messages. The public prosecution provided corresponding evidence based on the accused facts. According to this,", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 14:00 on January 27, 2016, in an alley near Shunxing Department Store in Datangdi of a certain village in a certain district of this city, the defendant Luo sold two small packets of drugs to the defendant Lei for 200 yuan, who then resold them on site to He, whereupon they were caught by the police. The police seized the two small packets of drugs involved in the transaction on site. The police also seized two additional small packets of drugs next to Luo and 300 yuan in drug money from Lei. According to identification, the two packets of white crystals used in the transaction weighed 1.42 grams and contained methamphetamine. The two packets of white crystals seized next to Luo weighed 1.56 grams and contained methamphetamine. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, statements from the defendants, identification opinions, on-site inspection records, and identification records, among other relevant evidence. Based on the above facts,", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that: From March 2014 to November 2015, defendant Nan, without approval from industrial and commercial or environmental protection departments, opened a powder coating factory at the foot of a certain mountain in a village in Longshan Town, Cixi City, engaging in unauthorized phosphating processing of iron products. The defendant Yuan was specifically responsible for production and discharged the wastewater generated during processing directly into the environment without treatment. On November 9, 2015, the phosphating processing activities were discovered by enforcement officers from the Cixi City Environmental Protection Bureau, who subsequently sampled the factory's wastewater. Monitoring by the Cixi City Environmental Protection Monitoring Station, acknowledged by the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department, revealed zinc content of 30.6mg/L in the factory's stormwater drains and 648mg/L in the overflow discharge, both exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards outlined in the \"Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard\" by more than three times. On November 9, 2015, defendant Nan voluntarily turned himself in at the Longshan Police Station of the Cixi City Public Security Bureau. After being brought to the case, defendants Nan and Yuan truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Nan and Yuan had no objections to these facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhu, and Li, identification records and photos, the Cixi City Environmental Protection Monitoring Station's monitoring report No. 179 (2015) on water, the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department document No. 404 (2015), on-site investigation records and photos, project commissioning order for monitoring (inspection), records of sampling and transfer of wastewater from the pollution source, original records of water sample testing, explanatory notes, the course of discovery, the process of surrender, and identity documents of defendants Nan and Yuan, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Nan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that, starting on May 5, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Chen, after prior consultation, organized gambling in the form of \"certain Mahjong\" and collected rake-offs in the basement of No. 7, Building 12, Hongyuan Community, Lecheng Street, Yueqing City. By the time the police intervened on July 20, 2014, the defendants Zhou and Chen had collected rake-offs amounting to over 14,210 yuan (which has since been refunded). The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhou and Chen during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhu, Li, Zuo, Fu, Zhao, Xu, and Shu, as well as evidence including the seizure list, cash payment slips, arrest records, inspection transcripts, administrative penalty decisions, proof of prior offenses, and household registration documents, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the court investigation, it was found that the victim, Wang Mou, collected a fee from Tian on the pretext of helping him obtain a driver's license, but failed to fulfill the promise. Consequently, Tian informed Tian Moumou (handled in a separate case) to help retrieve the fee. On February 4, 2014, at around 8:00 PM, Tian Moumou gathered defendants Wang, Zhou, Dai, and \"Yao Moumou\" (handled in a separate case), and after planning, they traveled from a town in a certain district of a city to Jiangbei District of the city. There, they tricked Wang Mou into getting into a hired unlicensed car and took control of him. Later, defendants Wang, Zhou, Dai, along with Tian Moumou and \"Yao Moumou,\" brought the victim Wang Mou to a forest near a cemetery in a certain village in a town of a certain district of the city. They used violent assault and verbal threats to force Wang Mou to repay the owed money. According to the assessment, Wang Mou suffered a contusion on the right eyelid, which constituted a minor injury. On March 10, 2014, defendant Wang was apprehended by police at a certain group in Xinbi Street, a county of a certain province; defendant Zhou was apprehended by police in a certain city of a certain province; defendant Dai was apprehended by police in a district of a city in a certain province. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang, Zhou, and Dai during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Wang Mou's statement, witness Tian's testimony, the fugitive information registration form, photos of the injuries, the forensic assessment of the degree of bodily harm, this court's criminal judgment (2012) Yongyin Criminal Initial No. 332, Beilun District People's Court of a city (2005) Yonglun Criminal Initial No. 99 criminal judgment, the account of the arrest, and the household registration certificates of the three defendants, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 10:00 a.m. on January 1, 2014, the defendants Fu and Ren boarded bus number 128 at the Machang Bus Stop on Furong North Road in Kaifu District of a certain city. While passenger Li was unprepared, Ren provided cover for Fu, who squeezed to Li's right side and placed a large cloth bag he was carrying over Li's shoulder bag. Fu then reached through the bottom of the cloth bag with his right hand, opened Li's shoulder bag, and stole cash amounting to 1,400 RMB before fleeing the scene. The stolen money was squandered by both defendants. Around 9:30 a.m. on January 2, 2014, Fu and Ren were apprehended by the public near the Chenjiahu Bus Stop on Furong North Road in Kaifu District of the same city and handed over to the police. After the incident, the defendants Fu and Ren truthfully confessed to the criminal acts. During the trial, the defendants Fu and Ren raised no objections to the above-stated facts, which were corroborated by evidence including the verified registration form for criminal cases, the process of apprehension, video surveillance footage and screenshots, the victim Li's statement, testimony from witness Zhang, the confessions and defenses of defendants Fu and Ren, along with their household registration proof and records of their conduct. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that in 2014, the defendant Dai purchased 300 jin of substandard salt through informal channels in two separate transactions and sold it to the Xinmin Supermarket operated by Fu in a certain village of a certain township in the county. Despite knowing that the salt was substandard, the defendant Fu sold 180 jin of it to nearby residents for consumption. On October 29, 2014, while conducting an inspection, staff from the county's Salt Industry Bureau discovered that the substandard salt sold by Dai and Fu had an iodine content of 0, as determined by the county's Center for Disease Control and Prevention. It was further found that after the incident, the defendants Dai and Fu voluntarily surrendered to the county public security bureau on December 15, 2014, and December 30, 2014, respectively. During the trial, the defendants Fu and Dai did not dispute the aforementioned facts, which were corroborated by witness testimonies, expert opinions, documentary evidence, and other evidence, making it sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Jiangsu Province charged: On December 8, 2014, at approximately 9:00 p.m., the defendant Zhang, in collusion with the defendant Wei, organized individuals including Gao, Tian, Li, Jiang, and Zhou to participate in gambling using Pai Gow as the gambling tool in room 2018 of the Tairun Hotel on Huashan Road, Xianü Town, in a certain district of a city. Defendant Zhang profited from this activity by collecting RMB 54,000 as a commission. At about 1:00 a.m. the next day, the public security authorities apprehended the aforementioned gambling activity at the scene and seized gambling funds amounting to RMB 1,639,500 and three sets of Pai Gow gambling tools. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Wei during the court hearing. Evidence presented by the prosecuting body includes depositions from non-present witnesses Li, Jiang, Gao, Zhou, Tian, Zhu Jia, Xu, Ju, Wang, Han, Hu, Ma, Zhu Yi, Wang, and Jing, the confessions of defendants Zhang and Wei, the criminal judgment (2014) Yang XX Criminal First Instance No. 00504, the criminal judgment (2009) Jiang XX No. 0044, proof of release, an administrative penalty decision by the public security bureau of a certain district in a city, lists of seized items, photos of the gambling scene, a detailed account of the arrest, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to determine the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that in October 2012, the defendant Zhang, together with the defendant Hou, impersonated staff members of the Handan Project Department of AoCheng Group. By claiming to contract a project, they convinced the victims, Guo A and Guo B, to first pay a good-faith deposit of 300,000 yuan. It was promised that after the project was contracted, the deposit would be returned to the victims, and the project would be awarded to the victims within 35 days. Believing this, on October 26 and October 28, 2012, the victims transferred 300,000 yuan in two installments through the Industrial and Commercial Bank to Hou's bank card (account number 62×××33) at the said bank. Later, upon realizing they had been deceived, the victims repeatedly sought Zhang and Hou to demand a refund, but the defendants gave various excuses. By the time of the case's discovery, 140,000 yuan had been returned to the victims. On September 27, 2013, the defendant Hou returned the remaining 160,000 yuan from the fraud to the victims and also paid 60,000 yuan in interest, gaining the victims' understanding. The main evidence provided by the prosecution includes: the victims' statements, witnesses' testimonies, bank transfer receipts from the Industrial and Commercial Bank, the letter of commitment, the agreement signed between AoCheng Group and a certain river park, the defendants' confessions and defenses, the understanding agreement, letters of understanding, and receipts, among others.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On the afternoon of November 1, 2013, the defendants Zhou, Ji (both prosecuted) were found cheating at gambling at the \"XX Food Operation Department\" on XX Road in a certain district of a certain city, and a dispute ensued. Defendant Zhou, Chang threatened with a machete and fled with Defendant Zhou, Ji, driving a black Honda car with license plate Y×××××, which was struck by thrown objects during the escape. Defendant Zhou, Ji had 5,000 RMB taken by victim Jiang and an additional 19,000 RMB taken by Jiang, Rong (a total of 24,000 RMB, of which 2,000 RMB was the gambling capital and 22,000 RMB were the winnings). Subsequently, Defendants Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si (already prosecuted) contacted Defendant Zhou and asked him to find people and tools. Defendant Zhou contacted Defendant An, who in turn contacted Zhou, Bi, Zhou, Hong, \"Xiao, XX,\" \"Xiao, XX,\" \"Qin, XX,\" and others (some fugitives) and instructed \"Xiao, XX\" to prepare steel pipes. That evening, Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si gathered with Defendant An and over ten other men carrying machetes, steel pipes, and other items, arrived at the entrance of the \"XX Food Operation Department,\" and found victim Jiang around 8 PM. Zhou, Ji, Zhou, Chang, and Zhou, Si led the group in assaulting victim Jiang with steel pipes and machetes before forcibly taking him to a sand pit on XX Road in Xiufeng District, where they continued to assault and verbal", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "An": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that, at approximately 4 a.m. on May 7, 2016, defendants Zheng and Xiong, along with Zhao Mouye (handled in a separate case), after conspiring together, carried tools such as hydraulic shears and flathead screwdrivers to Baolong Apartments in Sanbao Village, a town in a certain district of a certain city. By cutting the anti-theft lock and forcibly twisting off the headlock, they stole a black Xima XM125T-29 motorcycle (engine number: 68066917, frame number: LAEF6ZC87DRV61631) belonging to the victim, Wen, valued at 3,600 RMB, which was parked at that location. The defendants Zheng and Xiong raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, pled guilty, and there is supporting evidence from the victim Wen's statement, testimony, and identification records of witness Zhao, the \"On-Site Inspection Record\" and photos, the \"Seizure and Return List,\" the \"Capture Process,\" the \"Price Appraisal Conclusion,\" video screenshots, as well as confessions and identification records from defendants Zheng and Xiong, and some other evidence. All this evidence has been cross-examined in court and corroborated each other, and this court confirms it.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: 1. Around 1 a.m. on a day in September 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 5 or 6 RMB from a black BYD car with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Gong, which was parked at an intersection in a certain village of a town in this city. 2. Around 1 a.m. at the end of September 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 70 RMB from a silver-gray Wuling van with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Zhao, which was parked in front of \"Gaobo Snack Bar\" in a certain village of a town in this city. 3. Around 1 a.m. in early October 2014, defendants Chen and Wu unlocked a car door to steal 5 or 6 RMB from a green Nissan pickup truck with the license plate J×××××, owned by the victim Pan, which was parked in front of No. 79 Commercial Street in a certain village of a town in this city. At approximately 12:20 a.m. on October 12, 2014, police officers from a public security area in Wenling City arrested defendant Chen on the road in front of the villa area in a certain village of a town in this city. At approximately 1:40 a.m. on October 12, 2014, under the guidance of defendant Chen, police officers from a public security area in Wenling City arrested defendant Wu in the Haoting Internet Cafe in a certain village of a town in this city. After being brought to justice, defendants Chen and Wu both truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Wu during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Gong, Pan, and Zhao, the criminal judgment, the identification records of defendants Chen and Wu, the defendants' personal information, and the evidence of their arrest, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At about midnight on April 27, 2014, defendants Qu and Sha went to the home of Xu in Mache Village, Tongling 37, Hushan Street, of a certain city. Defendant Sha acted as a lookout outside, while defendant Qu climbed through a window into the house and stole two old mobile phones. Afterwards, defendants Qu and Sha fled the scene.", "label": {"Qu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 28, 2015, at around 18:00, defendants Luo and Guo, in order to demand a debt, met with the victim Kuang near the 331 Hospital in a certain district of a certain city. Defendants Luo and Guo then took Kuang by taxi to a small shop across from the Shanying Building, where they assaulted the victim Kuang inside the shop. Later, defendants Luo, Guo, and Yuan (handled separately) took the victim Kuang to Room 608 of the Xianle Hotel on Zhudong Road in a certain district of a certain city, where they continued to detain him until around 6:00 on January 28, 2015, when the victim Kuang was rescued by police officers. Inside the room, defendant Luo assaulted the victim Kuang. According to the assessment, the injuries of the victim Kuang were minor. On February 12, 2015, the victim Kuang forgave defendants Luo and Guo. Further examination revealed that after assaulting the victim Kuang in the shop, defendants Luo and Guo took Kuang by taxi to his home to ask him to find a housing fund card to repay the money, but they did not find it, so the defendants took the victim Kuang to Xianle Hotel for continued detention. These facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Guo during the court hearing and are supported by evidence including the report and statement of the victim Kuang, the testimony of witness Kuang A, identification records, the process of summoning, the crime-solving process, IOUs, SMS photos, medical records, a forensic evaluation report on human injury, a letter of forgiveness, an administrative penalty decision, population information materials, investigatory assessment opinion documents, and confessions from co-defendant Yuan and defendants Luo and Guo, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention"], "Guo": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The Huangpi District People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that on March 13, 2012, and February 3, 2013, Wuhan Hankou North Home Investment Co., Ltd. signed contracts for the Phase II Wholesale City backfill earthwork project with a certain city's Guoguo Housing Demolition Co., Ltd. of the Wuhu Farm in this district and Ma, Xiao from a certain city's Xuedao Earthwork Co., Ltd. On April 11, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, Huang Mouyi, an employee of the Guoguo Housing Demolition Co., Ltd., led construction personnel to excavate earth at the site specified in the contract of Ma, Xiao when a dispute occurred with Ma, Xiao. Ma, Xiao believed that their interests were infringed upon and then invited several unemployed individuals from Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District, to the construction site to prevent construction and assault Huang Mouyi. According to the forensic identification by Wuhan Aimin Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute: Huang Mouyi suffered compressive fractures in the chest vertebrae and multiple soft tissue injuries, and the degree of bodily injury was classified as minor injuries. After the incident, through mediation by the People’s Mediation Committee of the Wuhu Farm in the Huangpi District of a certain city: Ma, Xiao compensated the victim Huang Mouyi in full for medical expenses, totaling 50,000 RMB, and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by Ma, Xiao during the court hearing, and were supported by the report materials and statements of the victim Huang Mouyi; testimonies from witnesses Huang Moujia, Luo Mou, Hu Mou, Yu Mou, Jiao Mou, Zheng Mou; construction contract drawings; this court's criminal judgment; the arrest procedures and situation explanations from public security agencies; forensic clinical identification opinion, medical record evidence from the Aimin Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute of a certain city; the mediation agreement, receipts, and letter of understanding; the confessions of Ma, Xiao, and other evidence prove sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Luqiao District, a certain city, charges that at approximately 11 a.m. on July 10, 2013, defendant Zhang, carrying a watermelon knife, conspired with defendant Hu to go to the entrance of Kaiping Factory on South Street, Luqiao District, a certain city. Defendant Hu kept watch while defendant Zhang stole a blue Kaiyadi 35CC moped (valued at 2,200 RMB) belonging to a person named Ye by using a cart. In the course of the trial, defendants Hu and Zhang did not object to the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the following evidence verified in court: 1. Statement of the owner, Ye; 2. Identification record; 3. Seizure warrant; 4. Seizure record; 5. Seized items list; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. List of returned items; 8. Certificate of identification as a controlled knife; 9. Inspection record; 10. Photographs; 11. List of items transferred along with the case; 12. Details of the arrest; 13. Household registration proof; 14. Previous conviction records. The evidence is authentic and legal, sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the night of August 12, 2014, defendants Ma and Zhu, along with others, went to the entrance of the Picun Police Station in Picun Town, Danyang City. They used methods such as cutting wires to steal a Wuyang Honda WH125-12 motorcycle parked there by the victim, Liu. The motorcycle was appraised to be worth 5,792 RMB. On August 13, 2014, while patrolling, police officers noticed that defendants Ma and Zhu appeared to be nervous while riding a Honda 125 motorcycle. The officers stopped the defendants for questioning and inspection, discovering that the motorcycle did not have an ignition key and the wires under the ignition were cut. Both defendants could not explain the origin of the motorcycle. Subsequently, the police took them to the police station for further questioning. After being brought in, both defendants truthfully confessed to the theft of the motorcycle. Additionally, the stolen property had been recovered by the police and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were also confessed by defendants Ma and Zhu in court. The evidence includes the case investigation process, household registration certificates, the victim Liu's statement, the price appraisal report from the Danyang Price Certification Center, identification transcripts, photographs, and the list of seized and returned items. All of this evidence was cross-examined in court and holds legal proof efficacy, which this court acknowledges.", "label": {"Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From November to December 2014, defendants Liao and Wang, in collaboration with Song (handled in a separate case) and others, after prior conspiracy, orchestrated a scheme where individuals fabricated identities online to lure victims to the \"Night Owl\" bar on Yaojiang Road, Xinqi Street, in a certain district of a certain city, using the pretext of a meeting between male and female netizens, to entrap them into high-cost consumption. During this period, defendant Liao impersonated a female netizen to deliberately order expensive drinks, the bar used cheap wine as \"imported wine\" for her and the victims to \"consume,\" and defendant Wang was responsible for handling \"wine promoter group\" information for defendant Liao, entertaining guests, and so forth, to defraud the victims of their money. On December 16 and 17, 2014, defendants Liao and Wang defrauded victim Luo of 4,900 RMB and victim Bi of 4,700 RMB. After the crime occurred, defendant Liao voluntarily surrendered to the Xinqi Police Station of the Beilun Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed to her crimes. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, defendants Liao and Wang had refunded victim Luo 4,900 RMB and obtained his understanding. During the trial of this case, they also paid the compensation of 4,700 RMB to the court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liao and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Luo and Bi, the confessions of co-defendants Wang A, Chen, and Liu, as well as evidence including bank card transaction details, bank account opening and closing historical inquiry forms, identification transcripts and photos, extraction transcripts, seizure decisions, seizure lists and photos, statements of the process of being brought to justice, arrest process, evidence retrieval notifications, POS machine transaction records and registration information, and basic information of permanent residents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on the evening of March 22, 2016, at around 10 PM, the defendants Ze and Xia, along with Ga (who is at large), conspired to steal a car in a certain city. Subsequently, the three drove a black Hyundai car around the city to scout locations. At approximately 2 AM the following day, the three stole a white Wuling minivan parked by the roadside at the entrance of Songzhou Garden in Jin'an Town, a certain county. According to the price appraisal conducted by the Price Appraisal Center of the Price Bureau of the county, the stolen white minivan was valued at 31,000.00 RMB.", "label": {"Ze": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charges: The defendant He and the victim Pan met through an introduction in the second half of 2009. They had a son on October 10, 2010, and registered their marriage at the Guixi City Civil Affairs Bureau on February 10, 2014. Later, the two began living apart in 2016 due to marital discord. After separation, He, through a matchmaker, met the defendant Wang, who, knowing He was still married, lived together with him. In the lunar new year of 2017, Wang arranged for both parties' parents to meet and gave He's parents a betrothal gift of 60,000 yuan. Subsequently, the two officially began cohabiting as husband and wife. He gave birth to a daughter on November 22, 2017, at Yingtan People's Hospital. After the victim Pan learned of this in late November 2017, he reported the case to the public security authorities on January 8, 2018. Following the incident, the defendant He voluntarily surrendered to the Yudong Police Station in Nanning City, a certain place, on July 23, 2020, and truthfully confessed his crime upon arrival. The defendant Wang was summoned by public security officers via telephone on August 4, 2020, and also truthfully confessed his crime upon arrival. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants He and Wang during the trial. They are substantiated by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, filing decision, statement of apprehension circumstances, marriage certificate, testimonies of witnesses including Wang and Qiu, the victim Pan's statement, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants He and Wang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"He": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of September 14, 2015, the defendants, Qu and Jia, arrived at the area under Building 10 in Liaodong Lianjian, Wutian Street, a district in a certain city. Defendant Jia waited downstairs while defendant Qu climbed through a window into Room 201, the residence of the victim, Lin. Defendant Qu stole a watch (valued at 1,970 RMB as per the appraisal), 300 RMB in cash, 27 USD (equivalent to 172 RMB according to the appraisal), and 75,000 Korean Won (equivalent to 404 RMB according to the appraisal). Currently, 15 RMB of the stolen money has yet to be recovered. The defendants Qu and Jia raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, and these are substantiated by victim Lin's statement, identification records, valuation reports, inspection notes, examination records, seizure warrants, seizure lists, photographs, return forms, exchange rate tables, evidence of illegal activity, arrest records, and identification documents, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in the early hours of May 10, 2016, defendants Fu and Li allowed drug users Zhang A, Zhang B, Yang, and others to use methamphetamine in a room at the staff dormitory located at ** Nan Sha Street, ** Building, ** Village, ** District, ** City, where Fu and Li resided. On May 13, 2016, police officers arrested defendants Fu and Li in the aforementioned dormitory and seized a homemade drug use tool made from a mineral water bottle on-site. Defendants Fu and Li raised no objections to these facts during the hearing. The testimony and identification records from witnesses Zhang A, Zhang B, and Yang, search records, seizure lists, photos of physical evidence, administrative penalty decision, details of the arrest, household registration materials, and statements made by defendants Fu and Li during the investigation phase serve as evidence, which is sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that on March 29, 2017, the defendants Zhou and Yang concealed the fact that they were married, pretended to be father and daughter, and met with the victim Wang and others in front of the Liyuan Town Government in Yizhang County, arranging a blind date between Yang and Wang. After both parties agreed, it was agreed that Wang would pay a total bride price of 60,000 yuan to Yang's side. At around 12:00 on the following day, Zhou, Yang, Wang, and others met at the Yongwang Restaurant opposite the Pingshi Train Station in a certain province's Lechang City. Yang provided her ID card and divorce certificate from her ex-husband for Wang to view in order to gain trust, and Wang paid Zhou 25,000 yuan of the bride price on the spot. Subsequently, Zhou and Yang made excuses to send Wang away and turned off their phones. After Wang realized he had been deceived, he immediately reported the case. The evidence used by the public prosecution agency to prove the above facts includes: household registration certificate, process of arrest, seizure decision, seized items, document list, call details, marriage certificate, marriage registration management information system inquiry, birth medical certificate, witness testimony, victim's statement, on-site investigation and inspection record, identification record, and the defendants' confessions and defenses.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on October 3, 2016, defendants Chen and Si agreed with Huang to purchase fast-growing forest trees covering about 14 acres in Wuliu Village, a district in a certain town of a county, for the price of 107,000 yuan. On October 5 of the same year, after paying a deposit of 50,000 yuan to Huang, Chen and Si, disregarding national laws and without applying to the County Forestry Bureau for a timber harvesting permit, illegally hired Wang and Wu to cut down the fast-growing forest trees located in Wuliu Village, a district in a certain town of a county. On October 7, 2016, the illegal logging site was appraised by Nanning Zhenning Forestry Technical Services Co., Ltd.: the illegal logging site was in Zouwei Village Committee's Group 3 forest of a certain town in a certain county. The area of illegally logged forest was 0.31 hectares, with a timber volume of 29 cubic meters, and the tree species of the illegally logged forest was Eucalyptus grandis. The defendants Chen and Si raised no objection to these facts during the court hearing, and there is evidence to confirm these facts, including the case acceptance registration form, the case filing decision letter, the capture process, the household registration certificate, the certification from the Administrative Approval Office of the County Forestry Bureau, the appraisal appointment document, the forest harvesting site investigation results from Group 3 forest of Zouwei Village Committee in a certain town of a certain county, the appraisal opinion notification, the on-site inspection record, the identification transcript, the site diagram, the site photographs, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Wang, and Wu, as well as the confessions of defendants Chen and Si. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Si": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on November 25, 2013, the defendants Li and Yang were at a barbecue restaurant on Yan'an North Lane in the Yunyan District of this city. They had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim, Long, which escalated into a fight. Subsequently, the defendant Li injured the victim's head with a knife. According to the forensic judicial identification center of Guiyang Medical College, the victim's injury was assessed as minor (severe). The family of the defendant Li had reached a compensation agreement with the victim on his behalf (100,000 yuan has been paid). During the court trial, defendants Li and Yang confessed to the facts mentioned above and requested leniency. These facts were presented by the public prosecution agency in court, and were confirmed through cross-examination during the trial. The evidence, including the statements of defendants Li and Yang at the public security agency, household registration certificates, witne", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain district of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charged that in May 2014, the defendants Lu, Liang, and Zhou jointly invested 6,000 yuan to purchase pine forest trees located on the \"Six Temple\" slope in a certain village of a certain township in the county from a person named Huang. Without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, they illegally cut down the said pine forest trees and transported them as logs to a nearby wood chip factory in a certain township of the county for sale. On March 4, 2015, the defendants Lu, Liang, and Zhou voluntarily surrendered themselves to the County's Forest Public Security Bureau. After an on-site survey and measurement by forestry technicians, it was determined that Lu, Liang, and Zhou had cut down a total of 193 pine trees, with an accumulated volume of 37.8457 cubic meters. The prosecution submitted relevant evidence to support the facts of the accusation.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on July 10, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the victim, Hu, had a conflict with the security guards of Zhonglu Plaza near the external elevator at the back door of Zhonglu Plaza Phase II in Yaohai District, a certain city. Subsequently, the defendants, Yao and Meng, arrived at the scene of the conflict and assaulted the victim, Hu, resulting in the fracture of Hu's 5th to 8th ribs on the left side of his body. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of the city's Public Security Bureau, the degree of Hu's injury was classified as minor injury level two.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses that in the early morning of February 7, 2015, defendants Li and Tang jointly went to the GXG men's clothing store at 48-3 Guangping Road, a certain city. They entered the premises by prying open the door and stole 1,300 yuan in cash and a GXG leather down jacket, with a physical value of 2,818.8 yuan, from the victim, Chen. On February 11, 2015, defendants Li and Tang were apprehended, and a pair of scissors, a flashlight, three screwdrivers, and a crowbar were seized from defendant Li as tools used in the crime. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Tang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Stolen money in the amount of 1,000 yuan and the stolen GXG down jacket have been recovered and returned to the victim. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Tang during the trial of this case and are verified by evidence, including the victim Chen's statement, the seizure decision, temporary seizure receipts and return vouchers, photographs, on-site identification records and photos, price assessment report, criminal judgment, criminal records, population information form, and the arrest process provided by law enforcement personnel, which are sufficient for conviction. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants above, the prosecution suggests sentencing defendants Li and Tang to imprisonment for eight to ten months, along with a fine.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged that on April 4, 2014, around 20:00, the defendant Xu had a dispute with the victim Jiang over trivial matters at No. 12 in a district of this city. Xu then called the defendant Yuan and others to beat the victim Jiang, resulting in minor injuries to Jiang. After the incident, the defendant Xu turned himself in at the Tanshi Police Station of the Jiangshan Public Security Bureau in Zhejiang Province on October 8, 2015. Xu's family has compensated the victim with 39,000 RMB and has obtained the victim's understanding. In order to prove the above facts, the prosecution presented physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, expert opinions, identification records, the victim's statements, and the defendants' confessions in court.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: \n\n1. From January to May 2013, the defendant Luo repeatedly allowed others to use drugs in room 401, No. 30, Overseas City, a certain district, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. Specifically: in February 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Lin and Wei to use the drug methamphetamine at his residence. In April 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Wei and Yang to use methamphetamine at his residence. In May 2013, the defendant Luo allowed Yang to use methamphetamine at his residence on three separate occasions. On the evening of May 29, 2013, the defendant Luo allowed \"Chen Fangyan\" to use methamphetamine at his residence. In the early hours of May 30, 2013, the defendant Luo allowed \"Chen Fangyan\" and Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence.\n\n2. From April to May 2013, the defendant Yang repeatedly allowed others to use drugs in room B325, Jiangnan Small Town, a certain district, a certain city, where he rented accommodation. Specifically: in April 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Luo and Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence. In May 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Wei to use methamphetamine at his residence on three separate occasions. In May 2013, the defendant Yang allowed Luo to use methamphetamine at his residence. On May 31, 2013, the defendants Yang and Luo were apprehended by the police at their respective residences for drug use.\n\nThe aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Luo and Yang during the trial process, and are further substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Wei and Zhu, the household registration certificates issued by the public security authorities, the evidence of apprehension, the administrative penalty decision, the housing lease agreement, the receipts, the identification records, and the on-site test reports, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charged that in January 2017, the victim Wang, through an introduction by another person, met Liang and asked Liang to help find a wife for his son. Liang contacted the defendant Wei, and Wei, together with defendants Zhou, Li, and Zhu (handled in a separate case), met in a certain town to discuss using marriage as bait to deceive Wang out of his money. At the end of January 2017, the two parties agreed to meet in a certain county. Wei, Zhu, Zhou, and Li hired a vehicle to come to a certain town. Afterwards, they changed the meeting location to a certain county, but Zhu did not continue the journey. At around 2 p.m. that afternoon, Wei, Zhou, and Li met Wang in the town. They agreed on a bride price of 40,000 yuan, and Wang immediately gave a deposit of 10,000 yuan to Liang, who then handed the 10,000 yuan to Wei. Wei and the others accompanied Wang and Li to a certain prefecture to board a vehicle back to a certain location. They were unable to book train tickets in time and thus took a coach back. Upon arrival at the location, Wang gave the remaining 30,000 yuan of the bride price to Wei. After receiving the money, Wei left with Zhou, while Li and Wang boarded a bus heading to a certain destination. During the ride, Li claimed he needed to get off the bus to use the restroom and used the opportunity to escape. Defendants Zhou and Wei turned themselves into the police on December 25, 2017, and January 4, 2019, respectively. The prosecution provided related evidence to support the charges.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on July 30, 2013, defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng went to the vicinity of the Wuming Toll Station Highway intersection in Wuming County and, without any legitimate and valid proof of origin, purchased a black Dongfeng ZN6461WIF3 small passenger vehicle (Vehicle Identification Number: LJNMEW1JX9N018500, Engine Number: SGS2399) at a low price of 10,000 RMB from a man with the nickname \"A.\" After appraisal, the vehicle was valued at 85,775 RMB. After the case was solved, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the owner. On August 29, 2013, defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng again went to the vicinity of the Wuming Toll Station Highway intersection in Wuming County and, without any legitimate and valid proof of origin, purchased a Hyundai BH7141MY small car (Engine Number: BB540726, Frame Number: LBERCACB4BX060257) at a low price of 8,000 RMB from the same man nicknamed \"A.\" During the transaction, they were caught by the police on the spot. After appraisal, this vehicle was valued at 64,560 RMB. After the case was solved, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng during the court trial and were confirmed by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified and authenticated by the court: the inventory of seized and returned items and other physical evidence; case registration forms, decision to initiate investigation, arrest records, motor vehicle licenses, motor vehicle registration information forms, statements, population information forms, health examination registration forms for persons under supervision by Nanning Public Security Bureau and other documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Liu and He; confessions from defendants Lin, Lu, and Zheng; appraisal conclusion reports, identification records, and recognition photos.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused: Between the night of April 13, 2016, and the early hours of the next day, the defendants Tang and Wei (handled in a separate case) drove a three-wheeled vehicle to the roadside of the village center in Tielu Village, Feiyun Subdistrict, a certain city. Using tools such as a socket, jack, and steel pipe, they stole two Cheng Shin-brand tires and two Cheng Shin-brand steel rims from the rear of a heavy dump truck with the license plate number ×××××, owned by the victim Wang. According to appraisal, the two tires and rims were valued at 5,120 RMB. In the early hours of April 15, 2016, the defendants Tang, Yang, and Wei (handled in a separate case), after prior conspiracy, drove a three-wheeled vehicle and an electric bike respectively, to the roadside at the entrance of a certain village on the new Provincial Highway 56 in Yunzhou, Feiyun Subdistrict, a certain city. Defendants Tang and Wei used sockets, jacks, and steel pipes to remove the tires, while defendant Yang stood by as a lookout, stealing two Shen Tong-brand tires and two Cheng Shin-brand steel rims from the rear of the construction vehicle with the license plate number ×××××, owned by the victim Cai. According to appraisal, the two tires and rims were valued at 3,515 RMB. On April 16 and 18, 2016, defendants Yang and Tang were respectively apprehended by public security organs. Subsequently, defendants Tang and Yang each returned illegal proceeds of 3,000 RMB and 1,000 RMB, and returned 2,000 RMB each to victims Wang and Cai. During the trial phase at this court, defendant Yang returned illegal proceeds of 1,515 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Tang and Yang during the trial process, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Wang and Cai, price appraisal certificates, seizure lists, return lists, photographs, call records, statements, the process of apprehension, household registration certificates, and other evidence, sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on the afternoon of November 6, 2012, defendants Luo and Nie conspired to break into Room 204, No. 48, Building 14, South Gardens Third Community, Haizhou Street, Haining City. Using lock-picking techniques, they stole one Lenovo IBM-X60 laptop, one iPad tablet, twelve packs of cigarettes, and one foreign currency commemorative album from the victim Wang Wen. The total value of the stolen goods was 4,585 yuan. After the crime, the mentioned stolen goods were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The defendants Luo and Nie raised no objections to these facts during the trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Wang's statement, the search warrant, search records and photos, a temporary item storage list and photos, a list of seized items, the price appraisal report, investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, surveillance video, arrest details, and household registration evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Nie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 6 a.m. on May 21, 2015, defendants Dang and Xu went to the Jinrun Internet Cafe in Yanta District of this city to look for someone but were unsuccessful. Dang noticed that the victim Liu, who was asleep while online, had a wallet in the left pocket of his pants, and suggested to Xu that they steal the wallet. The two of them repeatedly attempted several times in turns and eventually succeeded in stealing the victim's wallet. After dividing up the more than 1,000 yuan in cash from the wallet, they discarded the wallet (which contained four bank cards and an ID card). On June 2 of the same year, Dang and Xu were arrested by the public security authorities. After the incident, Dang and Xu compensated the victim for his losses and obtained his understanding. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Dang and Xu during the court trial and were sufficiently confirmed by evidence such as the report materials, details of the arrest, household registration certificates, surveillance video screenshots, letter of understanding, receipts, the victim Liu's statement, the confessions of defendants Dang and Xu, identification records and photos, and surveillance video. The defenders of both defendants had no objections to the facts charged in the indictment and provided a defense argument highlighting the defendants' good attitude in admitting guilt, compensating the victim for economic losses, and obtaining understanding, recommending the court to impose lenient punishment on the two defendants.", "label": {"Dang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges: Defendants Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu were all service staff at the Yin Hai Entertainment Club in the Agricultural and Sideline Products Logistics Center, Liangzhu Street, Yuhang District, Hangzhou. On the evening of June 30, 2013, the victim, Li, and a friend were singing in Room 511 of the club. At around 11 PM, when the victim Li and others were settling the bill, they refused to pay a tip, leading to a dispute with defendant Niu in the club's lobby. Defendant Yang, who was singing at the club at the time, heard the commotion and approached to punch and kick the victim Li. Yang also instructed defendants Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu to successively use baseball bats to beat the victim Li. Among them, defendant Zhang struck the victim Li in the face with a baseball bat. On September 16 of the same year, a forensic evaluation by the Yuhang District Public Security Bureau in Hangzhou determined that the victim Li sustained bilateral nasal bone fractures and a nasal septum fracture due to the trauma, which constituted minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Yang, Tian, Zhang, Niu, and Liu subsequently reached a settlement agreement with the victim Li, collectively compensating him with 100,000 RMB, and obtained Li's understanding. The evidence for these charges includes the victim's statement, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, identification records, audio-visual materials (CD), a forensic report on the degree of huma", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from the end of July 2015 to September 9, 2015, the defendant Li, in collaboration with others, set up a casino on a street near the Shapo Wei market in a certain town of a certain city, using buttons as gambling tools. During this period, on September 6 and September 9, 2015, the defendants Li and Wei jointly invested in acting as the bank at this casino. After receiving a report, police officers arrested both defendants and seized gambling funds amounting to 326 RMB and 300 buttons used as gambling tools at the scene. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Li and Wei during the court hearing. They were substantiated by documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration certificates, a list of confiscated items, and by witness testimonies from Chen, Gan, Rong, and Li A, as well as the confessions of the defendants Li and Wei. Additionally, evidence was supported by on-site investigation records, diagrams, photos, extraction records, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that between April and October 2018, the defendants Liang and Wei, who were tinning workers at Changzhou Xinen Metal Products Co., Ltd., took advantage of their positions to embezzle 643 kilograms of production raw material tin ingots from the company's workshop, with a total value of more than 80,000 RMB, by carrying them out personally on multiple occasions. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Liang voluntarily returned 12,906.25 RMB of his salary and compensated the victim unit with 50,000 RMB. Defendant Wei also compensated the victim unit with 50,000 RMB, and both obtained the victim unit's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Wei during the trial, and they are substantiated by documentary evidence including bank transaction lists, transfer records, attendance sheets, invoices, and letters of understanding. Additionally, the testimony records of witnesses, such as Chen and Ma, as well as police documentation of the incident, arrests, identification records, photos, confiscation, and search records, weighing records, and a price assessment conclusion issued by the Wujin District Price Certification Center in Changzhou, all provide sufficient confirmation.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention"], "Wei": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial was conducted, it was established that from January 2015 to May 28, 2015, the defendants Xu and Hong knowingly purchased counterfeit branded sportswear from places such as the Sijiqing Clothing Market in Hangzhou. They set up a Taobao online store in a certain residential area of a city where they temporarily resided, selling these counterfeit goods to the outside world, with total sales amounting to over 270,000 RMB. On May 28, 2015, the public security authorities seized 121 pieces of counterfeit branded sportswear along with 100 packaging bags, valued at nearly 5,000 RMB, from the defendants' temporary residence. Additionally, they confiscated one computer tower, one Lenovo all-in-one machine, account books, express delivery slips, seals, purchase receipts, and a USB drive used for the crime. Following the incident, the families of Xu and Hong returned illegal proceeds of 90,000 RMB on their behalf. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xu and Hong or their defense during the court proceedings, and were substantiated by evidence such as search records, a list and photos of items seized, a list of evidence collected, a CD of Alipay transaction data, statements explaining the appraisal situation, and testimonies from the defendants Xu and Hong, which were sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: From early 2005 to October 24, 2013, defendants Jin and Wang, without following the required application procedures, illegally tapped into the water pipeline of Wenling City Water Supply Co., Ltd. to supply water for their own use and offered it to others for a fee. They stole approximately 2,243 tons of water, valued at about 6,737 RMB. On April 11, 2014, after negotiating with Wenling City Water Supply Co., Ltd., defendants Jin and Wang each paid 11,995.20 RMB to the company. On November 13, 2013, defendant Jin voluntarily went to the Chengdong Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his involvement in the crime. On December 4, 2013, defendant Wang, after being summoned, went to the Chengdong Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his involvement in the crime. These facts were undisputed by defendants Jin and Wang during the court proceedings and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ding, Qu, He, and Liu; photographs of the water meters; water pricing charts and explanations of the water recovery situation; water measurement tables; leasing contracts; water bills; explanation of the voluntary surrender; basic information on residents; and the process of bringing the defendants to justice; all of which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that since 2017, a crime syndicate headed by Chen (handled in a separate case) and involving the defendants Liang and Wang, as well as others, operated the business of the Zhongqi Financial Services Company Certain Mountain Branch in a certain city's Guangsha Business Building on the mid-section of Jianshe Road. The branch later moved to Room 607 of the Jitai Building on Zhongxing Road in the same city for its operations. After investigation, it was found that during the operation of the Zhongqi Financial Services Company's Certain Mountain Branch, the company deceived numerous victims in urgent need of loans by claiming that loans required no collateral or credit checks. Victims were led to sign falsely inflated loan contracts with amounts not matching the actual loan amounts and were defrauded through demands for deposits, management fees, home visit fees, and through the imposition of interest rates far exceeding the legal limit and high penalty fees, causing", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charges that, starting in June 2016, the defendants Guo and Wen were successively employed by a co-defendant \"Lao Huo\" (whose case is handled separately) to engage in crowd gambling using poker cards to play \"San Gong\" in an unlicensed shack next to the Zhongtong Express in the Sixth Team of Xiejiazhuang, Taihe Town, Baiyun District, in this city. At approximately 2 a.m. on January 5, 2017, Guo, Wen, and several gamblers were apprehended at the aforementioned location by the public security personnel. A deck of playing cards used as a tool for the crime and gambling funds totaling RMB 9,710 were seized on-site. Based on the aforementioned facts,", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendant Huang is the head of Huining County Hongsheng Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. From August 2018 to July 2019, in order to increase car sales, Huang and the defendant Wu (an employee of the company) discussed using fake motor vehicle driver's licenses to handle vehicle mortgage procedures for customers. Wu collected relevant information from four customers and collected 960 yuan, which was given to Huang. Huang sent the relevant information via WeChat to the maker of the fake driver's licenses and transferred 500 yuan. Once the fake motor vehicle driver's licenses were made, Wu delivered them to the four buyers of the fake licenses. During this period, Huang individually arranged for two fake motor vehicle driver's licenses for others.", "label": {"Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on February 13, 2018, the defendant Wo purchased a semi-automatic rifle (7.62 mm caliber, gunpowder powered) from Wu Moumou (at large) in a room of a certain hotel in a certain district of a certain city. One day in April 2018, the defendant Wo delivered the semi-automatic rifle to defendant Wang for safekeeping at a certain hotel in a certain town of a certain banner in a certain city. Defendant Wang, on that day, delivered the rifle to defendant He for safekeeping at a certain bungalow in the same town, and He stored the rifle under the bed in the bedroom of his home. According to the identification by the Forensic Evidence Center of the Ministry of Public Security, the semi-automatic rifle was legally recognized as a firearm. After being brought to justice, defendants Wo, He, and Wang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts and voluntarily signed a plea of guilty and punishment agreement. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wo, He, and Wang during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as the seizure record, seizure list and photographs, the police response document, the acceptance and filing documents, jurisdiction designation letter, compulsory measure documentation, case explanation, inquiry of criminal records, report materials, supplementary investigation statement, the testimony of witness Xue, the identification report from the Forensic Evidence Center of the Ministry of Public Security (Forensic [2018] No. 3068), and the on-site inspection record and photographs from the Manzhouli City Public Security Bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wo": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from June 10, 2018, to September 3, 2018, the defendants Yu and You placed orders for fine lungs and pig blood tofu. When defendant Yu went to Huabao Company to pick up the goods, defendant You replaced them with high-priced pig products of the same total weight, such as pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, and large intestine heads. During this period, the two used a total of 3,945 kilograms of fine lungs and 920 kilograms of pig blood tofu to place orders, thus misappropriating a total of 4,865 kilograms of high-priced pig products including pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, and large intestine heads. After accounting, from June 10, 2018, to September 3, 2018, the price of fine lungs fluctuated between 0.7 to 2.3 yuan per kilogram, and the price of pig blood tofu was 3 yuan per kilogram. Among the five types of products including pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, large intestine heads, and pig trotters, the lowest price was that of pig trotters, at 26.4 yuan per kilogram. Calculating based on the highest price of fine lungs at 2.3 yuan per kilogram, the highest price of pig blood tofu at 3 yuan per kilogram, and the lowest price of the five products (pig stomachs, pig half tails, crescent bones, large intestine heads, pig trotters) at 26.4 yuan per kilogram, the defendants Yu and You misappropriated a total of 116,602.5 yuan from Huabao Company through these means.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "You": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Yang and Gao had no objections to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The defender of defendant Yang agreed that the behavior of defendant Yang constituted the crime of x but stated that: 1. The organization of gambling by the defendant was brief, with few sessions, a small number of participants, limited gambling funds, and low profit from taking a cut; therefore, the criminal circumstances were ordinary, with minor subjective malice and low social harm. 2. Defendant Yang showed a good attitude towards admitting guilt, expressed remorse, was a first-time and occasional offender, and could be given a lenient punishment. In summary, it is suggested that defendant Yang be sentenced to a prison term of 6 months to 1 year with probation. The facts of the case ascertained by this court are consistent with the prosecution's charges. The evidence proving the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as arrest procedure, population information, administrative penalty decisions, criminal records, and explanatory statements; 2. Testimonials from witnesses Yu and Li, among others; 3. Confessions and defenses by defendants Yang and Gao; 4. Identification records; 5. On-site photographs. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that one evening in November 2013, the defendant Jia contacted the defendant Bai to deliver approximately 4 grams of drugs to a drug user named Li living in a certain county. They agreed on a transaction price of 2,000 yuan. Li paid this amount to Jia through Bai in two installments, and Bai took a cut of 250 yuan. One evening in December 2013, the defendant Jia contacted the defendant Bai to deliver approximately 1 gram of drugs to a man at the Luliang District Committee family compound. Bai, knowing the transaction was for drug trafficking, still followed Jia's instructions and delivered the drugs. He forwarded the transaction amount of 400 yuan to Jia and took a cut of 50 yuan. One evening in January 2014, the defendant Jia sold approximately 0.5 grams of drugs for 500 yuan to a drug user named Xue in a taxi driven by Li with license plate Jin J×××××, near the Sunshine Coast Hotel in Xiya Di, Lishi District. On the evening of January 20, 2014, public security officers from Lishi District found a package containing 0.48 grams of suspected drug material with skin, an electronic scale, and 50 small plastic bags in a bag carried by the defendant Jia. After identification, methamphetamine was detected in the suspected drug material carried. The above facts were basically undisputed by defendant Jia during the trial, and similarly undisputed by defendant Bai, supported by the confessions of defendants Jia and Bai; witness testimonies from Li, Xue, and Li; recognition records, identification documents, lists of items seized and returned, photo descriptions, situation explanations, case explanations, household registration information and other evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kuiwen District in a certain city charged: In the early morning of March 26, 2014, the defendant Zhang instigated defendants Pang and Ma to drive from a certain city to the urban area to find the victim, Xu Moujia, to demand repayment of a debt. At around 9 a.m. the next day, after finding the victim, Xu Moujia, at the Qixing Hotel in Kuiwen District, the defendants illegally detained him at the Home Inn in Weicheng District until around 2:30 p.m. on the same day. During this period, defendants Zhang, Ma, and Pang used thumb cuffs, electric batons, and their fists and feet to torture the victim, Xu Moujia, and forced him to write a repayment plan. The beating resulted in multiple contusions on the victim Xu Moujia's hands, swelling of both thumbs, a fracture of the right transverse process of the second lumbar vertebra, and a herniated disc. According to forensic identification, the victim Xu Moujia's injuries were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. In response to the accusations, the prosecuting authority read and produced evidence such as the confessions and defenses of the defendants, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statement, identification records, appraisal opinions, and audio-visual materials.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Pang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain Procuratorate in a certain region accuses: On July 5, 2013, the defendants Dong and Chang, together with Yun from a certain town (dealt with in a separate case), signed a \"Real Estate Cooperative Development Agreement.\" It was agreed that the three would invest in shares, and that a certain city's Tianyi Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. would build and develop the Ruyi Jiayuan residential community (later renamed Tianyi International City) in Sanjianfang Village, a town in a certain region. The agreement stipulated that after it took effect, a Ruyi Jiayuan Development Project Department would be established, with defendant Dong serving as general manager, and defendants Chang and Yun serving as deputy general managers. Subsequently, defendants Dong, Chang, and Yun divided responsibilities and, in the name of the company, signed and executed a \"Land Acquisition, Replacement, and Transfer Agreement\" with the villagers of Sanjianfang Village, obtaining land. The Ruyi Jiayuan development project covered a total of 12.4258 hectares. Without the approval of the land management department, the land use was changed for the construction of residential buildings and for ground hardening. Later, experts organized by a certain city's Land and Resources Bureau appraised that the construction of the residential buildings and the ground hardening severely damaged the farming conditions of 67.9395 mu of arable land. On November 14, 2019, defendant Chang surrendered to the Jingshan Police Station of the local Public Security Bureau. The Land and Resources Bureau in the certain region issued administrative penalties to Tianyi Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. on August 6, 2014, and December 5, 2018. The company paid fines of 666,670 yuan on October 22 and 24, 2014; a total of 812,970 yuan for farmland reclamation fees on March 29, 2018; and a fine of 1.7 million yuan on December 5, 2018. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presents corresponding evidence to the court: documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendant confessions, and expert opinions.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authorities charge: In June 2015, the defendants Wang and Kuang rented the basement of a self-built house at No. 1, Qing Tian Fifth Alley, Shuimogou District in this city. Wang was responsible for paying the rent, while Kuang purchased a fishing machine that could simultaneously accommodate 8 players (identified as 8 gambling game machines), and another fishing machine for 10 players (identified as 10 gambling game machines), and was also responsible for managing petty cash and settling turnover. Wang and Kuang employed Li to manage customer credits and clean the premises. On October 9, 2015, at around 11 PM, police officers inspected the basement of the self-built house at No. 1, Qing Tian Fifth Alley, Shuimogou District and caught the defendant Kuang, arcade attendant Li, and gamblers Xu and Zhao on the spot. They seized a fishing machine for 8 players, a fishing machine for 10 players, gambling petty cash totaling 1,500 yuan, and five account books. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Kuang during the court hearing, and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Xu, Qin, and Zhao, search records, on-site photos, identification records, seizure lists, IOUs, account books, the opinion on the gambling nature of the game, arrest process, and the identification documents of the defendants Wang and Kuang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Kuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on October 19, 2014, at around 21:00, defendants Wu, Yang, and Pan took advantage of the absence of the victim, Chen, to jointly steal the victim's Benling-brand electric bicycle within the Ronghe Shanshui Green City residential area on East Mingxiu Road, in a certain district of a certain city. According to the appraisal, the involved Benling-brand electric bicycle was valued at 2,772 RMB. It was further found that on October 20, 2014, the public security authorities apprehended defendants Pan and Wu, and the next day apprehended defendant Yang. After the incident, the public security authorities seized the stolen electric bicycle from defendant Pan and legally returned it to the victim, Chen. During the court hearing, the three defendants also confessed to the above criminal facts without objection, and the allegations were substantiated by the victim's statement, identification records and photos, the confessions and defenses of the three defendants, the price appraisal opinion, the list of seized and returned items, and related documentary evidence, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: In June 2013, the victim Zhou defaulted on two months' wages owed to the defendants Zhao, Kang, and You (handled in a separate case) and subsequently absconded. Later, the defendants Zhao, Kang, and You filed a complaint with the Jinhua City Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, falsely claiming that Zhou owed them each three months' wages, totaling more than 30,000 RMB. During the police questioning, they still falsely claimed that Zhou owed each of them three months' wages. On December 5 of the same year, the police took criminal detention measures against Zhou to pursue and apprehend him. On September 21, 2015, Zhou was captured and detained at the Jinhua City Detention Center, but after the facts were clarified, he was released on September 25. To substantiate the facts of the charges mentioned above, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence.", "label": {"Kang": ["Detention"], "Zhao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency alleges that on May 18, 2013, at around 23:00, the defendant Xiao, in the parking lot of Yayipark, Chancheng District, in a certain city, smashed the window glass of a JAC Refine seven-seater van parked there by the victim Jian and stole a black and white backpack from inside the vehicle. The backpack contained a Lenovo Zhaoyang V31 series laptop worth 320 RMB, a white Coolpad mobile phone worth 519.87 RMB, and 150 RMB in cash. On the night of May 26, at around 21:00, the defendants Xiao and Du, along with \"Zhu\" and \"Diao\" (both handled in separate cases), in a parking lot near the roadside of Wenhua Park in Chancheng District of the same city, smashed the window glass of a car parked there by the victim Chen and stole 8,000 RMB in cash, a Samsung mobile phone worth 80 RMB, a counterfeit Sony Ericsson mobile phone worth 80 RMB, a counterfeit LV leather bag valued at 227 RMB, and a handbag with the brand SAICHI and other items. On May 28, 2013, at around 19:00, the police apprehended the defendants Xiao and Du at a pavilion near the parking lot of Wenhua Park in Chancheng District (some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to the two victims). The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Du during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen and Jian, the list of seized and returned items, on-site investigation records, search records, a price appraisal certificate, fingerprint identification certificate, arrest process document, household registration proof, the defendants' statements during the investigation phase, and the identification records, which are sufficient to verify the claims.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: 1. On August 17, 2016, defendant Han, together with defendant Guo, went to the vicinity of a certain hot spring bath on a certain road in a town of a certain county. Using marbles and other instruments, they broke the glass of the front passenger door of a white Kaiyi brand car (license plate: Yu G×××××) owned by the victim Chang, which was parked by the roadside. They stole a black Samsung tablet and 100 yuan in cash from the car. According to an appraisal by the price appraisal center of the county, the stolen tablet was valued at 1125 yuan. The tablet and the 100 yuan in cash have been returned to the victim. 2. On August 17, 2016, defendant Han, together with defendant Guo, went to the front of a certain auto parts store near a certain bridge in a county, and, using marbles and other instruments, broke the left rear door glass of a white GAC Trumpchi SUV (license plate: Yu A×××××) owned by the victim Zheng, which was parked by the roadside. They stole a black leather bag placed on the seat behind the driver. According to the appraisal by the county's price appraisal center, the stolen bag was valued at 1200 yuan. The bag has been returned to the victim. 3. On the evening of August 10, 2016, defendant Guo went to a small town on a certain road in a township of a certain county in a certain province, and, using marbles and other tools, broke the glass of a Cadillac SUV owned by the victim Qi, parked by the roadside. He stole a leather bag, mobile phone, cigarettes, and other items from the car. According to the appraisal by the county's price appraisal center, the total value of the stolen items was 12711 yuan. In summary, defendant Guo stole items, cash, etc., totaling 15136 yuan, and defendant Han stole items, cash, etc., totaling 2425 yuan. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution submitted evidence including the judgment, list of seized items, testimonies from witnesses Fu and Geng, statements from the victims Chang, Zheng, and Qi, confessions and defenses from defendants Guo and Han, appraisal opinion from the Yanjin Price Certification Center, and a CD, among other evidence.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that: On January 29, 2014, at around 8 p.m., the defendants Li and Cui confronted Gui outside the game room on Zhenxing Road, Sanzhang Town, Nanxun Town, Nanxun District of this city to demand repayment of a debt. Gui refused to repay and had a poor attitude, leading to a scuffle between Li and Gui. During the altercation, Gui picked up a roadside stone intending to hit Li. Seeing this, defendant Cui stepped in to help, and together with Li, they beat Gui, resulting in injuries to Gui's leg. Forensic examination determined that the fracture in Gui's right lower limb constituted a level-one minor injury. After the incident, defendants Li and Cui voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed their crimes. They reached a compensation agreement with the victim Gui and paid the agreed compensation. The facts above were not contested by defendants Li and Cui during the trial, and were supported by evidence such as personal information, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, medical records, agreements, letter of understanding, receipts, witness testimony of Hu, the arrest process, Gui's statements, and forensic assessment of bodily injuries, all sufficient for verification.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendant Jin, together with Xu, used an air gun to illegally hunt on five occasions in a certain town of a certain city in January 2020. Among these, on January 2, 2020, they illegally hunted a wild animal by the roadside of a certain village in the same town. According to the appraisal, the air gun used for illegal hunting qualifies as a firearm. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution read aloud and presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Jin and Xu in court.", "label": {"Jin": ["Detention"], "Xu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that on May 18, 2014, at noon, the defendants Li and Zhang went to the garage of the house of Zhou in Building 2, Phase 4 of the University City in Huanghua City. Li then entered through the back door of the garage to commit theft, while Zhang was on lookout outside. During this theft, they stole a power hammer, a circular saw, and an angle grinder, with a total value of 1085 yuan. On May 20, at around 8 a.m., defendants Li and Zhang again went to the garage of Zhou's house in the same location to commit theft. Li opened the back door of the garage and stole two welding machines stored inside, handing them over to Zhang. Zhang hid the two welding machines in the utility meter boxes on the fifth and seventh floors of the building. Li was caught on the spot when he was about to enter the garage for another theft, and Zhang was subsequently also apprehended. The two welding machines were valued at 2200 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Zhang during the trial. Their statements, along with testimonies from Zhou, Zhang Jia, Shi, Zhang Yi, identification records, photos, lists of seized and returned items, and value appraisal reports, serve as evidence sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between August 13 and August 23, 2016, the defendants Bian and Guo, on three separate occasions, conspired to go to the alleyway in front of ** Electrical Appliance Factory in Nanxinan Village, Xiao Cao'e Town, Yuyao City. They used methods such as transporting with a battery-powered tricycle to steal over 1000 kilograms of scrap iron, worth a total of 1000 RMB, which belonged to the victim Wang. On August 24 of the same year, the defendants Bian and Guo were apprehended by local police officers. After the incident, they returned the stolen funds amounting to 1000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Bian and Guo during the court proceedings and are supported by documentary evidence, including the \"Arrest Record\" from the Yuyao Municipal Public Security Bureau, photographic evidence, population information, witness testimony from Zhang, the victim Wang's statement, identification records and photos, a price assessment report, and surveillance video discs, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Bian": ["Fine"], "Guo": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Based on the trial findings: From 2016 to March 30, 2017, the defendant Li, either alone or in conjunction with the defendant Zhu, committed theft in the \"Lanke Internet Cafe\" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town of a certain county on two occasions, stealing items such as computer hosts and mice, with a total value of 2314.2 yuan. Defendant Li was involved in two theft cases, stealing items such as computer hosts and mice, with a total value of 2314.2 yuan; Defendant Zhu was involved in one theft case, stealing items such as a computer host and iced tea, with a total value of 2284.2 yuan. Detailed as follows: 1. In 2016, defendant Li stole two mice and one mouse pad in the \"Lanke Internet Cafe\" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town of a certain county. After the case occurred, all the stolen items were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Tang. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 30 yuan. 2. On March 30, 2017, defendants Li and Zhu stole one host number 47 and two bottles of iced tea in the \"Lanke Internet Cafe\" operated by Tang on a street in a certain town. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 2284.2 yuan. After the case occurred, all the stolen items were recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Tang. Additionally, it was found that after being brought to justice, defendants Li and Zhu truthfully confessed the criminal facts of themselves and their co-offenders. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Li and Zhu during the trial, and are corroborated by the statement of the victim Tang, the testimony of the non-appearing witness Mo, site inspection records and photos, identification records and crime scene photos, search records and photos, seizure decisions, seizure and return inventories, price appraisal opinion, surveillance video, criminal judgment, parole proof, case investigation progress, apprehension progress, household registration information, and related documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 8 PM on July 19, 2014, defendant Wang collided and engaged in an argument with victim Qian while playing football on a road at the city's beach Phase III. Following this, Wang intended to retaliate. At about 10 PM the same day, defendant Wang, together with defendant Fan who arrived at the scene later, injured victim Qian in the head and face with punches at the toll gate of the city's beach Phase III. A forensic appraisal determined that victim Qian suffered blunt force trauma to the nose, resulting in bilateral nasal bone fractures and a nasal septum fracture, with the injuries classified as minor injuries of second degree. Defendant Wang surrendered to law enforcement on August 6, 2014. Defendant Fan was apprehended by the police on August 22, 2014. It was further established that after the incident, defendants Wang and Fan reached a mediation agreement with victim Qian regarding civil compensation, where Wang and Fan jointly compensated Qian for economic losses totaling 30,000 RMB. Victim Qian expressed understanding towards defendants Wang and Fan and waived their right to file an ancillary civil lawsuit. The defendants raised no objections to these facts during the court proceedings, and the facts were substantiated by material evidence photos; documentation of apprehension and case-solving by the police, situational explanations, the criminal judgment, mediation agreement, receipts, statement of understanding, and witness testimonies from Zhang, Deng, and Zhong; the statement from victim Qian; the forensic appraisal report, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Fan": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that: From the end of February 2014 to April of the same year, defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng, after prior conspiracy, set up gambling dens in various locations such as a rented house on Zhongxing South Street in a certain village of a certain town, another rented house behind the Haoting Hotel in a certain town, and above a small shop in a certain village of a certain town. They organized gambling activities and extracted profits amounting to 30,000 RMB. During the trial of the case, defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng returned the illegal income of 30,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao, Li, and Deng during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu, Chen, Lu, and Lin, as well as by the public security administrative punishment decision, the process of arrest, and basic population information. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: Between November and December 2012, the defendant Zhang, knowing that the items were stolen, still purchased 30 grams of gold jewelry including rings, a gold bracelet, a platinum ring, and a gold peanut from Yu (already convicted) and others at the Jiner Gold Shop in Hengjie, Yinzhou District, a city in a certain province. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned items is RMB 24,535. Between November and December 2012, the defendant Huang, knowing that the items were stolen, repeatedly purchased one Lenovo Y460, Acer AS2420, Lenovo E40, HP FP632PA, and Hasee laptop from Yu and others at the \"Huang's Second-hand Goods Store\" in a certain district of a city in a certain province. According to the appraisal, the total value of the aforementioned laptops is RMB 10,740. After the case was uncovered, some of the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victims. The defendant Zhang refunded stolen money totaling RMB 16,100, and the defendant Huang refunded stolen money totaling RMB 5,480. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Zhang and Huang during the court proceedings and are supported by the statements of the victims Zhu, Xu, Lu, Luo, He, and Wang, the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Sun, and others, the explanation of the case's resolution, identification records, lists of seized and returned items, receipts, the appraisal conclusion report by the Xinchang County Pricing Certification Center, the criminal judgment No. 373 of 2013 of this court, as well as the basic information of the permanent population, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that between March and May 2015, the defendant Yang distributed printed solicitation cards to rooms in hotels such as Huijin Business Hotel in the district. After negotiating the prostitution fee with Yang via the solicitation phone number on these cards, Yang and Kuang arranged for prostitutes like Liu to come to the hotel rooms for prostitution, and subsequently took a certain percentage of the proceeds as an introduction fee. At around 1 a.m. on May 15, 2015, defendants Yang and Kuang, using the aforementioned method, introduced prostitute Liu to Room 6602 of Huijin Business Hotel in the district for prostitution with client Zou. On June 9, 2015, defendant Yang was apprehended by public security personnel on a C××××× vehicle near a rented room at No. 5 Fangsheng Pond, Songtai Street in the district; defendant Kuang was apprehended on the same day inside the aforementioned rented room. During the trial, the defendants had no objection to the aforementioned facts, corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zou and Liu, photographs of condoms, mobile phones as tools of the crime, business cards, lists of seized items, lists of returned items, decisions of administrative penalties, lists of received evidence materials, hotel registration information, images, call records, lists of confiscated items, electronic evidence examination reports, search record transcripts, identification transcripts, surveillance videos, arrest process details, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Kuang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiang'an District, a certain city, charged: During May 2013, defendants Xiong and Chen conspired to illegally appropriate No. 0 diesel fuel belonging to the company by taking advantage of Xiong's position as the dormitory administrator of the Hong Kong Road staff dormitory of Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel in a certain city. In the early hours of May 3, May 19, and May 23, 2013, defendant Chen invited Li (handled separately) to drive a certain area's A××××× Mustang small car (with 23 fifty-pound oil barrels inside) from a certain city in a certain province to the staff dormitory of Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel on Hong Kong Road in a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Chen filled the 23 pre-brought fifty-pound oil barrels with No. 0 diesel stored in the dormitory boiler room. Defendant Chen transported them back to a certain city in a certain province for personal use and paid defendant Xiong 3,000 yuan in illegal proceeds on three occasions. Around 3 a.m. on May 23, 2013, defendant Chen was stopped by police at a checkpoint while transporting the 23 fifty-pound barrels of No. 0 diesel weighing a total of 1,150 pounds and valued at 4,428 yuan; on the same day, the public security authorities arrested defendants Xiong and Chen. In summary, defendants Xiong and Chen misappropriated a total of 3,450 pounds of No. 0 diesel fuel valued at 13,284 yuan from Kanglong Taizi Wine House Limited Liability Company garden hotel in a certain city on three occasions. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Xiong and Chen during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang and Li; records of seizure, identification transcripts, seizure lists, return lists, photos, delivery notes, and other documentary evidence; price authentication opinions; arrest and case-solving processes, situation explanations; and the confessions of defendants Xiong and Chen, which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xiong": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xixiangtang District in a certain city charged: 1. On February 14, 2017, the defendants Cai and Li jointly stole a Boleia brand electric scooter (license plate: **096, frame number: 201508000001352), which belonged to the victim Luo and was parked by the roadside at No. 38 Lupan Road, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the scooter at the time of the crime was 2,376 RMB. 2. On March 12, 2017, the defendants Cai and Li jointly stole a Hongqi brand electric scooter (license plate: **867, frame number: 783221604434454), which belonged to the victim Zhu and was parked at the parking area in front of Gate 6, Huaxi Commercial City, No. 38 Huaxi Road, Xixiangtang District, in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the value of the scooter at the time of the crime was 2,142 RMB. The prosecution provided evidence such as the case registration form, details of the arrest, basic information forms of the individuals, the list of seized and returned items, the list of accepted evidential materials, the electric scooter information registration form, invoices, explanation of the situation, statements of the victims Luo and Zhu, confessions and defenses of the defendants Cai and Li, price appraisal conclusion, identification records, on-site identification records and photos, on-site surveillance videos, etc. It was considered that the defendants Cai and Li, with the purpose of illegal possession, secretly stole other people's property, with a total value of 4,518 RMB, which constitutes a large amount. The actions of both defendants have violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient, and both defendants should be held criminally responsible for x crime. The court is requested to sentence according to law. During the trial, defendants Cai and Li had no objections to the facts and charges contained in the indictment and voluntarily pleaded guilty. Upon examination, it was found that the facts that the prosecution charged defendants Cai and Li with x crime were clear, and the evidence was sufficient, and substantial enough to establish the charges.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses: At around 3 a.m. on February 18, 2014, defendants Huang and Hong, after premeditation, carried tools such as wrenches and screwdrivers, and went to the \"Good Butler\" supermarket at 529 Xihong Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou City. They entered the supermarket by breaking walls and stole cash totaling 3,000 yuan, mobile and China Unicom phone recharge cards valued at 2,400 yuan, 16 packs of Soft Zhonghua brand cigarettes valued at 5,938 yuan, one carton of Three Five brand cigarettes, 5 bottles of Yanghe Blue Classic liquor, and 3 bottles of Castel red wine, among other items, and then fled the scene. On February 21, 2014, defendants Huang and Hong were arrested by the police. A total of 7,900 yuan, 16 packs of Soft Zhonghua cigarettes, one carton of \"555\" brand cigarettes, five bottles of Yanghe Blue Classic liquor, and three bottles of red wine have been recovered and returned to the victim, Liu.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on the morning of February 25, 2012, defendant Zou purchased 16 boxes of \"Gong Capsule\" from an unknown street vendor at Qingping Market, Liwan District, Guangzhou, at a price of 1.5 yuan per box, for the purpose of resale. On the afternoon of March 1, 2012, defendant Zou brought these 16 boxes of \"Gong Capsule\" to Wanyingtang Pharmacy in Jida, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City for promotion. The person in charge of Wanyingtang Pharmacy, defendant Ning, without verifying the legal source of the medicine, purchased all 16 boxes at a price of 3 yuan each and placed them on the shelves for sale at 6 yuan each. On March 28, 2012, staff from the Zhuhai Municipal Food and Drug Administration conducted a random inspection of the aforementioned \"Gong Capsule\" at Wanyingtang Pharmacy. According to the appraisal, the 16 boxes of \"Gong Capsule\" sold at Wanyingtang Pharmacy were identified as counterfeit drugs. On March 5, 2013, defendants Zou and Ning turned themselves in to the Gongbei Public Security Administration Brigade for investigation. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Ning and Zou during the trial, and were substantiated by the testimony and identification records of witness Zhang, along with business licenses, drug operation permits, sales slips, official replies, sales instructions, on-site inspection records, notices of seizure, investigation records, statements upon arrival, explanatory notes, household registration information, drug appraisal conclusion reports, drug quality announcements, as well as photos of the scene and physical evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ning": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged that defendants Zhu and Xu, after prior conspiracy, from September 2 to September 10, 2015, gathered gamblers in a room at a certain number in the Chengdong Street of the city to gamble using mahjong tiles in the form of \"Niu Niu,\" operating the casino for more than 10 sessions and extracting profits of over 10,000 yuan. Among them, defendant Zhu was responsible for collecting the house fee, while defendant Xu provided the venue. Furthermore, it was found that on September 10, 2015, police officers from the city's public security bureau, after receiving a report from the public, arrested defendants Zhu and Xu, who were operating the casino, along with other gamblers Xue, Ma, Jiang, Zhou, Zhang, Chen, and more than 20 others, in a room at a certain number in Chengdong Street of the city. They seized 40 sets of mahjong tiles from defendant Zhu and confiscated 3,100 yuan (which has been submitted to the state treasury). The aforementioned facts have been repeatedly confessed by defendants Zhu and Xu in the records, and they raised no objections during the court proceedings. Additionally, there are decisions on evidence preservation, lists, confiscation lists, a general payment receipt for the confiscated income by the city, witness testimonies from Xue, Ma, Gu, Jiang, Zhou, Zhang, Chen, Du, Miao, Luo, Li, and others, on-site records and photos, the investigation process of the criminal case, and the criminal record and misconduct history of defendants Zhu and Xu, which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charged: In July 2013, Jiang utilized the premises of the \"Queyou Club\" located at 24 Yong'an Garden, Huashan District, Ma'anshan City, to set up six gaming machines with gambling functions, providing a venue for others to gamble and thereby obtaining illegal profits. Jiang employed Lai and Han to manage the daily operations of the gaming machine room. On the evening of July 30, 2013, law enforcement officers apprehended Han on-site at the \"Queyou Club\" and seized six gambling machines, accounting books, and other items, along with gambling funds amounting to 28,830 yuan. On August 8, 2013, Jiang and Lai voluntarily surrendered to the Yangjiashan Police Station and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. Jiang, Han, and Lai raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial proceedings. Additionally, evidence such as household registration certificates, accounting books, seizure lists, gambling machines, and testimonies from witnesses Liu, Yong, Ruan, and Yu, provided by the prosecution and verified during the trial, sufficiently confirm the facts.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Han": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that in the afternoon in late August 2013, defendants Bao and Chen stole 2 pieces of electrolytic copper plates, valued at 3,250 RMB, from the workshop of Linkun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. in the Penglang Street area of the development zone of a certain city. On the night of September 3 of the same year, defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia stole 9 pieces of electrolytic copper plates from the same location, valued at 10,400 RMB. The defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. Additionally, this court has found that the public security authorities seized 4,200 RMB of stolen money from defendant Bao, 4,500 RMB from defendant Chen, and 3,300 RMB from defendant Xia. The seized stolen money has been returned to the victimized unit by the public security authorities. During the trial process, close relatives of defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia compensated 1,650 RMB in stolen money on their behalf, which is currently held by this court. The above facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Shi, Yuan, Luo, Fan, Xu, and others, as well as by identification records, weighing records, price appraisal conclusions, search records, lists of seized and returned items, invoices, arrest details, identity documents, and other evidence. The defendants Bao, Chen, and Xia have confessed without objection, and their confessions are consistent with the facts proven by the aforementioned evidence. The evidence is confirmed to have probative value by this court.", "label": {"Bao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early hours of March 21, 2019, defendants Liu and Zhang climbed over the fence into the premises of Hongying Clothing Co., Ltd. in a certain city. After disabling the video surveillance, they entered the first-floor warehouse and stole 5 computer units, 2 computer monitors valued at 2,550 yuan, and 3 Hisense LCD TVs valued at over 3,000 yuan.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in October 2012, the defendant Chen met the victim Li at a certain location. In April 2013, Chen paid Li 75,000 yuan in cash, requesting Li to help him purchase a laser perspective device. At the end of April 2013, Li delivered a laser perspective device to Chen. In September 2013, Chen negotiated with Li again and requested Li to help him buy a better laser perspective device at a price of 230,000 yuan, subsequently paying Li a total of 250,000 yuan, but Li was never able to deliver the device. On June 25, 2015, after learning that Li was at a certain location, defendant Chen invited defendant He to join him in Guangzhou Baiyun Airport. In the early morning of June 26, they captured Li at Baiyun Airport, detained him at a hotel in a certain state, and demanded that Li repay the money for the goods. In the early morning of June 27, they rented a car to take Li back to a certain place and detained him in room 412 of the \"Fumilai\" Hotel there. Around 12 pm on June 28, Chen called in defendant Huang to join him and He in guarding Li, forbidding Li from leaving alone, and requiring accompaniment for meals or shopping. On June 30, around 8 am, after receiving a report, the Yong'an Police Station came to the scene and rescued Li. In response to the above charges, the prosecution read and presented relevant documentary evidence, the statements of the victim Li, and the testimonies of witnesses Cao and Li (from Ezhou), as well as those of the three defendants.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 10 a.m. on June 29, 2016, the defendant Yuan, in retaliation for nearly colliding with the victim Luo, invited the defendant Zhu and four other young men from society. Under the pretense of discussing an advertising business, the defendant Yuan and others lured Luo to the entrance of the Paris Night Fashion Restaurant on Dongfeng Road in a certain city. Once Luo was tricked into getting in the car, they forcibly controlled Luo and took him to a farm road next to the old village committee in the Jinshan Street area of an economic and technological development zone in a certain place. The defendants Yuan and Zhu used pre-prepared wooden sticks to beat Luo, causing multiple injuries to Luo's body. Subsequently, Luo escaped from the scene. According to the appraisal by the Qiushe Judicial Appraisal Center in a certain place, the injury to Luo's right shoulder was classified as minor injury level two. The defendant Yuan was arrested on December 19, 2016. The defendant Zhu surrendered himself to the public security authorities on May 23, 2017. After the incident, the defendant Yuan compensated the victim Luo 50,000 RMB for various economic losses, and the victim Luo expressed understanding towards the actions of the defendants Yuan and Zhu. During the trial, this court commissioned the community correction office of a certain city to conduct a social investigation on the defendants Yuan and Zhu. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yuan and Zhu during the court trial, and are supported by household registration certificates, the process of turning themselves in, outpatient medical records, proof documents, letters of understanding, and other documentary evidence; the victim Luo's statement; the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yuan and Zhu; site inspection records, identification transcripts and photos; an audiovisual material disc, and other evidence.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that around 7 PM on March 29, 2013, the defendant Wu, in order to collect a debt from Chen, collaborated with defendants Sun, Song, and others to forcibly take Chen in front of the grain and oil market at Yuelong Street in a certain county, into a Mazda car with the license plate Zhe B×××××. They then took Chen to a village in a certain town in the county, the large flower bed at the West Gate of Yuelong Street, and other places for detention. During this time, defendant Sun and others used physical assault to coerce Chen into repaying the debt. Around 11 PM on the same day, after Chen issued an IOU to defendant Wu, Wu, Sun, Song, and others returned Chen to Bashi Alley on Yuelong Street. According to forensic identification, Chen had a contusion to the left eye, constituting a minor injury. On April 11, April 24, 2013, and April 3, 2014, defendants Wu, Sun, and Song were captured and brought to justice by the police. After the incident, all three defendants obtained the pardon of the victim Chen. During the court hearing, defendants Wu, Sun, and Song raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, and there was corroborative evidence from the victim Chen's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Zhu, Sun A, identification records, photographs, forensic injury assessment, explanatory notes, letter of pardon, release registration form, case details explanation, arrest process details, and population information form, which is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 20:00 on May 29, 2019, the defendant Peng contacted drug buyer Yan via phone and agreed to sell 1 packet of drugs to Yan for RMB 1000. At around 21:00 that evening, Peng drove car *** with Yan to a rental house in a certain district of a certain city where defendant Luo lived to purchase drugs. At around 21:50, Yan transferred RMB 1000 to Peng's WeChat, but due to Luo telling Peng that there were no drugs available, Peng and Yan then left in car *** (owned by Peng A). At the same time, Peng refunded the RMB 1000 to Yan via WeChat. At around 22:55 that evening, while Peng was driving with Yan near Yanghai Avenue, Peng received a call from Luo stating that drugs were available, and they agreed on a price of RMB 800 for 1 small packet of drugs. Peng then collected RMB 800 from Yan and transferred the amount to Luo via WeChat. At around 23:00, Luo drove car *** (owned by Luo) near a certain district of a certain city and sold the small packet of drugs to Peng. Afterwards, near the Tianze Supermarket on Maiying Road in Qiongshan District, Peng sold the drugs to Yan. After the transaction, both were apprehended by police, who seized one black OPPO phone, RMB 1900 in cash, and car *** (returned to the owner) from Peng; and 1 small packet of drugs from Yan. After weighing and identification, the seized drugs were found to contain methamphetamine, with a net weight of 0.38 grams. At around 2:00 on May 30, 2019, the defendant Peng assisted the police in arresting the defendant Luo. Police seized 2 phones, car *** (owned by Luo), and 1 watch from Luo. The aforementioned facts did not face any objections from defendant Luo and Peng during the trial process, and were supported by evidence such as seizure orders, seizure lists, witness testimony from Yan, processes and explanations of coming to court, recognition records and identification photos, seizure records, weighing records and photos, sampling records, on-site investigation records, site diagrams, WeChat screenshots, call records, drug test reports, criminal judgment, release certificate, motor vehicle information, explanatory notes, personnel electronic files, and plea agreement documents, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Shanghai District People's Procuratorate charges: On January 5, 2014, at approximately 15:45, defendants Wang and Zhou, in a Hyundai car near a certain road in a district of this city, sold 1.94 grams of methamphetamine to Chen for 800 RMB and were caught on the scene by the police officers from Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau. After being brought to justice, both defendants Wang and Zhou truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhou assisted the public security agency in cracking the drug trafficking case involving Wang A, Chi, and Xu. The defendants Wang and Zhou raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and the evidence, including the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Chen and Feng, the seizure list and related photos provided by the Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, the inspection report from the Shanghai Drug Inspection Center, the special receipt for confiscated drugs issued by the Shanghai Public Security Bureau Anti-drug Department, the work situation, case filing decision, and prosecution recommendation issued by the Dajang Police Station of Baoshan Branch of Shanghai Public Security Bureau, and the criminal records of defendants Wang and Zhou, are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at about 13:00 on May 9, 2014, defendants Yu and Zhang, along with Yue and Zhao (both handled in separate cases), met with the victim, Jia, at the entrance of the China Construction Bank in Junchuang Plaza, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang City. Yue got into a quarrel and fight with Jia for some reason. Defendants Yu and Zhang successively held Jia down, while Yue and Zhao assaulted Jia, causing Jia to suffer from comminuted fractures of both nasal bones, as well as the frontal process of the left maxilla, and a nasal septum fracture. According to the assessment, this injury constitutes a minor injury of the second degree. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, the co-defendant Yue voluntarily reached an agreement with the victim Jia and compensated Jia a total of 45,000 RMB for various economic losses as agreed. Subsequently, Jia issued a \"Reconciliation Agreement\" expressing forgiveness for the actions of Zhang and Yu. The judicial authorities at the place of residence of Zhang and Yu provided an opinion of investigation and assessment agreeing to include the two in community correction management. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Zhang and Yu during the trial process, supported by their confessions at the public security agency, confessions of co-defendants Yue and Zhao, the statement of victim Jia, testimonies of witnesses An and Guo, the forensic injury assessment report by the Hebei Province Shijiazhuang Public Security Bureau Physical Evidence Assessment Institute (No. 748 [2014]), examination photos, video materials from the crime scene, the reconciliation agreement, details of the arrest, household registration certificates, proof of current behavior, and this court's criminal judgment No. 354 of the New Criminal First Instance (2014). The above evidence has legitimate sources, objective content, and was all cross-examined in court. This court has legally confirmed its validity.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention"], "Yu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: Starting in 2015, the defendant Ge purchased raw materials for manufacturing Anna Coffee in a certain district's Riyuexuan community where he manufactured liquid Anna Coffee and solid Anna Coffee. During this period, the defendant Xi assisted in manufacturing Anna Coffee. Subsequently, the two brought the manufactured Anna Coffee to their jointly operated \"Fruit Orchard Convenience Store Chain\" to sell. In June 2018, Li bought 10 bottles of Kangshifu bottled suspected liquid Anna Coffee at the defendants' store for 500 yuan. The identification showed that benzoic acid and caffeine were detected in all of them. On August 2, 2018, police searched the \"Fruit Orchard Convenience Store Chain ×× District residence\" jointly operated by the two defendants, and lawfully seized 109 bottles of suspected liquid Anna Coffee, suspected liquid Anna Coffee in an iron drum, 4 bags of sodium benzoate, 8 pieces of suspected solid Anna Coffee, poppy shells, and 7 bags of white powder. Identification revealed that the poppy shells contained codeine, morphine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine. The bottled suspected liquid Anna Coffee, the suspected liquid Anna Coffee in the iron drum, and the suspected solid Anna Coffee were all found to contain benzoic acid and caffeine.", "label": {"Ge": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On February 18, 2014, at around 22:00, defendants Liu and Zhou conspired together at the intersection of Jiefang Road and Dacheng Road in Wuchang District of this city. Defendant Zhou cooperated by obstructing the view of bystanders, while defendant Liu stole a white VIVO brand mobile phone from the pocket of pedestrian Wang. The two defendants were apprehended near the post office on Pengliuyang Road in this district during a police patrol inspection. The stolen phone has been recovered and returned to the owner, and it has been appraised to be worth 1,100 RMB. In the trial process, both defendants Liu and Zhou expressed no objections to the aforementioned facts. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the prosecution's evidence, including the arrest procedure proof provided by the public security agency, the list of seized and returned items, photos, valuation appraisal, testimonies of witnesses Tang and Lin, the victim Wang's report and statement, confessions of defendants Liu and Zhou, and Zhou's compulsory drug rehabilitation decision. The evidence is consistent and, after being presented and cross-examined in court, has been confirmed and is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain city's People's Procuratorate charges: On March 7, April 11, April 14, and April 15, 2014, the defendants Shui, Xian repeatedly allowed Li, Tian, Tang, Zhang, and others to use methamphetamine by \"ice pipe\" smoking in their rented apartment located at No. xxx, xx Lane, Longshan East Road, Anyang Street, a certain city. Around 2 a.m. on April 17, 2014, the defendants Shui, Xian, and others were caught in this rented apartment, and a simple ice pipe was seized on site. The defendants Shui, Xian raised no objections during the trial, and the facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Tian, Tang, Lin, the inspection records, evidence preservation list, administrative penalty decision, the arrest process, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on March 5 and March 10, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou respectively violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border to a certain location in a certain place. On March 27 of the same year, defendants Hou and Xu used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On April 6, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border together to a certain location in a certain place. On April 18 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On September 5, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou, along with Li, a villager from a village in a certain town in a certain county (handled in a separate case), and Jiang, a villager from a village in a certain town in a certain county (handled in a separate case), violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border together to a certain location in a certain place. On September 24 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. On November 15 and December 17, 2018, defendants Xu and Hou respectively violated immigration management regulations by avoiding border checkpoints and evading inspection to illegally cross the border to a certain location in a certain place and Bangkang. On December 28 of the same year, defendants Xu and Hou used the same method to illegally cross the border together back to a certain country. After being apprehended, defendant Xu truthfully confessed his criminal activities; after the incident, defendant Hou voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed his criminal activities.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: 1. On June 8, 2014, the defendants Zhang and Fan, riding a blue two-wheeled motorcycle, snatched a handbag from the victim, Yang, 100 meters south of the intersection of Xinguang West Road and Fengying Road in a certain district of a certain city. The bag contained 3,400 yuan in cash, a gold necklace (with a gold pendant), and a white Huawei mobile phone. According to the appraisal by the Price Authentication Center of a certain district in a certain city, the value of the gold necklace (with the gold pendant) was 4,704 yuan, and the value of the white Huawei mobile phone was 1,408 yuan. 2. On the morning of June 19, 2014, at around 9 o'clock, the defendants Zhang and Fan, riding a blue two-wheeled motorcycle, snatched a handbag from the front of the Jiutian Music Plaza opposite a certain location on Shaoxian Road, a certain district in a certain city. The handbag, which was on the front passenger seat of a car, belonged to the victim, Li, and contained 900 yuan in cash, a black Apple 5 mobile phone, and a black Apple 3 mobile phone. According to the appraisal by the Price Authentication Center of a certain district in a certain city, the value of the black Apple 5 mobile phone was 2,774 yuan, and the value of the black Apple 3 mobile phone was 580 yuan. After the incident, the black Apple 5 mobile phone and the black Apple 3 mobile phone were seized from the defendant Zhang and have been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Zhang and Fan during the court trial. Additionally, they were confirmed by evidence such as the report materials and victim's statements, the price appraisal certificate and situation explanation, on-site detection report, the arrest process, the list of seized and returned items, basic information of permanent residents, situation explanation, and the confessions of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wuzhong District, a certain city, charges: Defendants Shao and Cai, after premeditation, climbed over a wall to enter Yaxin Electronics Factory in Guoxiang Street, Wuzhong District, a certain city, in the early morning of March 3, 2016. They then cut and stole a 223.1-meter cable worth RMB 2153, belonging to a certain city's branch of China Tower Company, which was in use on the rooftop of the factory. It was further discovered that the two defendants stripped the insulation from the cable, obtaining 35 kilograms of pure copper, which they sold to Zhang, obtaining illegal proceeds of RMB 1050. The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shao and Cai during the trial. The evidence includes the statements of the victimized unit's staff members Ye and Cai A, the testimony of witness Zhang, records of identification and recognition, on-site inspection records and photos, investigation experiment records, forensic DNA identification report, appraisal report, case-solving and apprehension account, household registration certificate, and administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged: On a day in June or July 2014, Xu XX and another individual (both handled in separate cases) summoned Nie A, Shen Jia (nickname Wai XX), Shen Yi (nickname Xiao XX), Tao, Zhu (nickname Zhu A), and others for gambling using the \"Pai Jiu\" method at Room 1001, Unit 2, Building 68, Oulong Community, Niushan Street, Donghai County, profiting more than 7,000 yuan from the stakes. Despite knowing that Xu XX and the other individual organized gambling for others, defendants Liu and Xu provided financial assistance to the participants through the two organizers, by lending 10,000 yuan and benefiting 400 yuan. Specifically, through Xu, they provided 10,000 yuan to Zhu and 15,000 yuan to Shen Yi; through the other organizer, they provided 30,000 yuan to Shen Jia. After the case was uncovered, defendant Xu voluntarily turned himself in and truthfully confessed his criminal acts; defendant Liu also truthfully confessed his criminal acts upon being apprehended. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Xu during the trial and are substantiated by the criminal record registration form, administrative penalty decision; testimonies of witnesses Nie, Shen Jia, Dai, Shen Yi, Zhu, Tao, Yao, Wang, Zhang, Wang A; the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Xu, and co-defendants Xu XX and the other individual; identification records; household registration certificates; and evidence of case discovery and apprehension processes, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that in early March 2018, the defendant Xu conspired with Luo, the captain of the accident handling team of Liangzhou District Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade (handled in another case), to defraud insurance claims by fabricating a false traffic accident, with Xu creating the false traffic insurance accident scene. After discussing with defendant Li, Li agreed. Xu then discussed with defendant Liang, Wang2, Ma1, and others the specific process of fabricating the false traffic accident, deciding on the personnel and vehicles involved in the incident, and Xu and Wang2 carried out a preliminary inspection of the accident site. On the night of March 26, as prearranged, defendant Liang drove his pickup and Ma1 drove an electric scooter to create a false rear-end collision scene on the Talwan section of Liangzhou District. After Liang filed the insurance claim, Yong'an Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Wuwei Center Sub-branch assigned Xu, who was on duty that night, to examine the scene. Xu contacted Luo, and they arrived at the accident scene one after another and took photographs. Luo then fabricated the traffic accident identification, forensic autopsy opinion, mediation letter, household registration certificate, and other false insurance claim documents using other case materials and \"Photoshop\" technology, which were given to Xu. After being incrementally reported and approved by Li, Yong'an Insurance transferred insurance compensation amounts to Liang totaling 610,900 yuan. Xu then received 90,000 yuan, Luo and Li each received 200,000 yuan, Liang received 100,900 yuan, and Wang2 and Ma1 each received 20,000 yuan. After the incident was discovered, defendants Xu, Li, and Liang successively surrendered to the Gulang County Supervision Committee and returned the stolen money of 410,900 yuan to Yong'an Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Wuwei Center Sub-branch. Regarding the aforementioned accusation, the prosecution presented business licenses, labor contracts, traffic accident liability identification, autopsy reports, bank transaction certificates, and other documentary evidence, testimonies from witnesses such as Wang2 and Ma1, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Xu, Li, and Liang.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of October 30, 2014, defendants Shen and Wang, after prior planning, went to the workshop of \"Cifu Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.\" located in the Binhai district of a certain city and district. They stole a total of 74 circuit boards of various models from the winder machines in the workshop and were subsequently caught on the spot. An appraisal determined that the stolen goods were valued at a total of 137,637.15 yuan. During the court trial, defendants Shen and Wang raised no objection to the above facts. The case is substantiated by evidence, including the tools used in the crime, photos of the stolen goods, arrest reports, seizure and return lists, invoices, and quotations provided by the police officers from the public security bureau of a certain city and district, as well as testimonies from Han B and Han A, recognition records, inventory records, and the price appraisal report, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On January 20, 2015, the defendants Xu and Shi drove a tricycle to the western woods by the Sibao Gate in a certain county's economic development zone and illegally hunted 110 wild spotted doves by setting up sticky nets on trees. According to the appraisal by the Criminal Evidence Identification Center for Wildlife under the State Forestry Bureau's Forest Public Security Bureau, the aforementioned doves are classified as \"three haves\" animals protected by the state. The defendants did not dispute these facts during the court hearing, and the prosecution presented and verified evidence of the arrest process, household registration certificates of defendants Xu and Shi, the seizure list from the Public Security Bureau of the county, the testimony of the witness Zhang, the appraisal opinion of the Criminal Evidence Identification Center for Wildlife under the State Forestry Bureau, and the confessions of defendants Xu and Shi, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts. During the trial, the prosecutor stated that after coming to light, defendants Xu and Shi honestly confessed their criminal acts, qualifying as voluntary confessions, which is a statutory mitigating circumstance. Upon verification, this sentencing circumstance was found to be true and is hereby confirmed by this court.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention"], "Shi": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: On December 13, 2013, around 7 p.m., six law enforcement officers from the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau, including He, were conducting a crackdown on illegal operations of tricycles near the \"Spring Pouring to the World\" residential area. Liu Yi was stopped while carrying passengers on an electric tricycle. The urban management officers confiscated Liu's tricycle, after which Liu Yi lay down on the ground. Subsequently, Liu Yi's son Liu Jia and daughter-in-law Lai received a message that Liu Yi had been beaten by urban management personnel. Lai, along with the defendant Li, went to the \"Spring Pouring to the World\" residential area. Li called the defendant Wang, who arrived with others. Liu Jia, who was in Jingyan, also called for help. Due to these factors, a crowd gathered around where Liu Yi was lying. After the \"120\" ambulance took Liu Yi away, someone suggested going to the Urban Management Bureau to demand an explanation. Therefore, more than a dozen people drove to the courtyard of the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau. Finding no one at the bureau, the two defendants used an iron rod from the courtyard to smash the windows, doors, and lights of three vans marked \"Comprehensive Enforcement,\" with the license plates Chuan Z469**, Chuan Z785**, and Chuan ZBB4**. The damage to the vehicles was appraised at a value of 10,338.80 yuan. On December 23, 2013, Li turned himself in to the Ren Shou County Public Security Bureau. On January 7, 2014, Lai paid the compensation for the vehicle damages to the urban management unit. The aforementioned facts are clearly and sufficiently supported by evidence, including the on-site inspection records, site photos, price appraisal report, testimonies from 14 witnesses such as Liu Jia, Fan, Luo, Lai, and He, confessions from the defendants Wang and Li, a receipt from the Ren Shou County Urban Management Enforcement Bureau, an explanation of circumstances, and the process of bringing the case to justice. These facts are clear and the evidence is sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was ascertained that Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd. legally owns the No. 1980275 \"graphic\" registered trademark, which was recognized as a well-known trademark by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce on September 4, 2014. In early July 2016, the defendant Zhang, without authorization from Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd., gave defendant Leng a piece of cable produced by the company as a sample, indicating that he should produce a batch of cables counterfeiting the company's trademark according to the sample, and paid defendant Leng 2,000 yuan as compensation. On July 16, 2016, defendant Leng, using printing wheels and other tools commissioned to others at Yangzhou Yongcheng Electrical Cable Co., Ltd., where he worked, produced a batch of cables in various models with the wording \"Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd.\" and the same logo as the No. 1980275 registered trademark, totaling 55 pieces and more than 50,000 meters. On the morning of July 17, 2016, the batch of counterfeit cables was seized by public security organs when it was handed over to a logistics company in preparation for shipment to a certain city. According to the certification by Jiangsu Diyiyi Group Co., Ltd., the market sales price of genuine cables identical to this batch of counterfeit cables is more than 120,000 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Leng voluntarily went to the public security organs and truthfully confessed their criminal activities. Defendant Leng has handed over the illegal income of 2,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Leng during the court trial, and they are corroborated by their interrogation transcripts at the investigation agency, testimonies of witnesses Han, Ding, Yin, Xu A, Xu B, Yang, and others, the order notice, the goods waybill, the trademark registration certificate, the approval recognizing the well-known trademark, the business license, the price certification, the appraisal certification, the search warrant, on-site photos, basic permanent resident information, case registration form, and other evidence, sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Leng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on the evening of June 15, 2013, defendants Fang and Xu, after planning, drove to the old forest farm in Lishanbai, Qiandaohu Town, Chun'an County, and stole 50.94 square meters of granite belonging to the victim Jiang, valued at over 14,200 yuan. After the incident, all stolen granite was recovered and returned to the victim. Additionally, during the prosecution review period, victim Jiang submitted a written statement expressing forgiveness for defendant Fang and requested a lenient sentence for him. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Fang and Xu during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of victim Jiang, testimonies from witnesses Xu A and Tang, the apprehension and case-breaking process, the list of seized and returned items, granite measurement statistics, the criminal judgment, the letter of forgiveness, household registration certificates, price appraisal opinion and appraisal notification, search records, identification records, and photographic explanations, which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 19, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendants Wu and Liu got into an argument and a fight with the victim Li and others over trivial matters while dining at Brother's BBQ in a certain district of a certain city. The defendants Wu and Liu injured the victim Li. According to the forensic evaluation by the Forensic Judicial Appraisal Institute of the Central Hospital of the said city, the victim Li suffered a nasal bone fracture and a fracture of the fifth metacarpal bone in the right hand, both classified as minor injuries of the second degree.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on May 8, 2014, at approximately 1 a.m., at the Sesame Open Private Kitchen Restaurant on Prosperity East Road in Zhucheng City, Zang (already sentenced) had an altercation with Han. Subsequently, Zang called Wang, Zhang, Yu, along with Sun, Wang Jia, and Zhang Jia (all already sentenced), who damaged the Chevrolet Cruze and QQ cars that Han, Geng, and others were in, using beer bottles and floor tiles as the cars were about to leave. The damage to the car was appraised at a total of 2160 yuan. Further investigation by this court revealed that on August 28, 2014, the defendant Yu turned himself in to the Zhucheng City Public Security Bureau. The facts as mentioned above were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including written records of the police report, arrest procedures, fugitive registration forms, a letter of apology, household registration certification, criminal judgment documents, testimonies from witnesses such as An and Wang Yi, statements from the victims Han and Geng, confessions from co-defendants Zang, Sun, Wang Jia, and Zhang Jia, and the appraisal (certification) report of the value of items involved in the case from a certain provincial authority, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that around October 2012, Wang, the legal representative of Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd., agreed with Guo, who did not have a hazardous waste operation permit, to have Guo help Wang dispose of hazardous waste produced by Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd. Wang paid a certain fee to Guo for this. From around October 2012 to January 2013, Wang, Guo, and Li (handled in a separate case) did not fill out the hazardous waste transfer form according to national regulations and did not apply to the Yantai City Environmental Protection Bureau for the transfer. They hired vehicles multiple times to transport a total of 741 barrels of hazardous waste from Yantai Ruida Chemical Co., Ltd. and stored them in a village in a certain town of a certain city and a village in the Yantou Subdistrict Office. Around September 2013, due to a hazardous waste leakage, Li transferred the 741 barrels of hazardous waste to a mountain north of a village under the Yantou Subdistrict Office for storage. On July 3, 2015, Wang voluntarily appeared at the case following a telephone summons by the public security authorities. For the aforementioned charges, the prosecution provided evidence such as the defendant's confessions, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and expert opinions.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yufeng District, a certain city in a certain district of Guangxi, charged: On May 14, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., the defendants Fang and Lin, after premeditation, went to the front of a hospital on a certain road in a certain city. Taking advantage of the absence of people, they used tools prepared in advance to pry open the main lock and the handlebar lock of a \"Xinlei\" brand electric bicycle, valued at 1,880 RMB, which belonged to the victim, Deng. They then stole the bicycle. The stolen bicycle has been sold off, and the proceeds have been squandered and cannot be recovered. On November 24, 2014, at approximately 4 a.m., the defendants Fang and Lin were apprehended by the police on suspicion due to their suspicious behavior near a market on a particular road in a certain district of a certain city. They subsequently truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft acts, which were not yet known to the police. The defendants Fang and Lin raised no objections during the court hearing regarding the above facts, which are corroborated by the following evidence, verified and confirmed during the trial: the case registration form; the decision to file the case; the statement of the victim, Deng, and the purchase receipt of the stolen electric bicycle provided by him; the confessions of the defendants Fang and Lin, along with the identification and photo recognition records; the seizure decision and list, and photographs of the seized items; the price assessment report; the forensic opinion notice; the explanation of the case circumstances; and the household registration certificates of the defendants Fang and Lin, etc. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is concrete and sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Fang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 6 a.m. on May 3, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Li, at their home, knowingly purchased three motorcycles worth 11,400 yuan, which had an improper origin, from Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Wang Bing (the latter three have already been sentenced), for a price of 3,300 yuan. They then resold the motorcycles. Defendant Li turned himself in to the criminal investigation team of the mining area public security bureau on November 22, 2013. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence to the court to prove the above facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 2 a.m. on November 7, 2016, the defendants Su and Chen, after conspiring to commit theft, carried tools such as hydraulic pliers, scissors, and screwdrivers to No. 2, Alley 16, Chongdefang Street, in a certain town of this district. By using these tools to pick the lock, they stole a Yuehao brand 48CC women's motorcycle (engine number: 160924024, valued at 3,136 RMB) belonging to the victim Guan parked at that location. After committing the crime, defendants Su and Chen were caught in the act with the stolen goods while fleeing the scene by patrolling personnel.", "label": {"Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate accuses that on the evening of May 2, 2014, defendants Zhou and Lu went to a place in the Jiangbei Street area of this city to the Bai Le Bar to demand repayment of gambling debts from the victim Dai (referred to as Dai [B]) without success. A quarrel ensued between the two parties, during which defendants Zhou and Lu assaulted Dai [B], causing him to suffer fractured ribs. Subsequently, defendants Zhou and Lu forcibly took the victim Dai [B] to a section near the green belt in front of the Sanyou Yinglun Hotel in the Jiangbei Street area of this city, continuing to demand the repayment of the gambling debt. The victim Dai [B] contacted Dai [A] by phone to request money. Later, Dai [A], Wang, Ju, and Luo arrived at the scene and a fight broke out between them and defendants Zhou and Lu. Dai [A], Ju, and Wang chased defendant Lu, who, while fleeing, picked up a roadside no-parking plastic sign and struck it at the victim Wang. After both fell to the ground, defendant Lu further assaulted Wang with his fists, resulting in Wang suffering multiple skull and facial fractures. Subsequently, defendant Lu, wielding a watermelon knife and dustpan, and defendant Zhou, holding a watermelon knife, caught up with Dai [B] and others in front of the Jiangbei area's Haoyouduo Supermarket. Defendant Lu struck Dai [B] on the head with the dustpan, and after the dustpan broke apart, he used the dustpan handle to continue striking Dai [B]'s head, resulting in a scalp laceration for Dai [B]. According to the identification by the forensic evidence appraisal office of Dongyang City Public Security Bureau, the injuries of victim Dai [B] were classified as minor injuries, level two; the injuries of victim Wang were classified as minor injuries, level one. In order to substantiate the above accusations, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, forensic medical injury assessment reports, video materials, and the defendants' confessions. Based on the above facts and evidence,", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the trial investigation, on May 24, 2018, defendants Bai and Du conspired, with defendant Du finding Zhang, who was willing to repay their credit card debts for them, via the internet. They lied to Zhang on WeChat, claiming that they needed him to help repay a debt of 18,000 yuan and would give him a 180 yuan service fee. That night, the two defendants gave Zhang Bai’s China Minsheng Bank credit card number, which was ×××, along with the password. On May 25, 2018, the victim Zhang used a phone transfer method to repay 10,800 yuan to that card at the Zhonglian Steel Building, 103 Liberation Road, Xinghualing District, in a certain city. Defendant Du promptly transferred the 10,800 yuan via mobile banking to another China Minsheng Bank card owned by Bai, and Bai notified the bank to freeze the credit card. After the fraud, defendant Bai transferred 5,020 yuan to Du, and the stolen money was entirely squandered. On December 10, 2018, defendant Du and Bai’s relatives compensated victim Zhang 10,800 yuan, and Zhang issued a letter of understanding expressing forgiveness for the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Bai and Du during the court trial and were supported by evidence such as the investigation report and arrest process; the statement of the victim Zhang; the identification records; screenshots of WeChat chat logs; transaction records of Bai’s China Minsheng Bank card; the letter of understanding; the confessions of defendants Bai and Du; and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After hearing and verifying the case, it was established that on July 26, 2015, the defendant Wei accompanied her husband Li in a Wuling Sunshine minivan, along with the defendant Chen and her husband Cheng, to a city to inspect breakfast restaurants. Around noon, the group arrived at the \"Authentic Beef Noodle\" restaurant owned by Li's daughter, Li. Cheng intended to buy some items for Li, so he walked north along Jianshe Street. When passing Xin Hua Computer, he noticed a wallet inside the basket of a parked electric bicycle. Later, during lunch, Cheng mentioned the incident, which was overheard by Chen and Wei. The two took advantage of a restroom break to go to the front of Xin Hua Computer store. Wei stood to the left of Chen, assisting in concealing her actions while Chen opened the electric bicycle basket lid and took the wallet. They then fled the scene. On their way back, Chen divided the stolen 3,900 yuan cash with Wei, keeping 3,900 yuan for herself. The wallet and bank cards were discarded. After the crime, the defendants' families returned all the stolen money to the police, which has since been returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wei during the trial, and were supported by the following evidence: the police case registration form, acceptance registration form, decision to file a case; victim Wang's statement; confessions by defendants Chen and Wei; witness testimonies from Cheng, Li, Wang, and Li; recognition transcripts; situation report from the Criminal Investigation Team of Guangzhou Railway Public Security Bureau Huizhou Branch; transfer documents and detention certificates issued by the detention center of Guangzhou Railway Public Security Bureau Huizhou Branch; certificates and criminal records from Zilu Police Station of Luoshan County Public Security Bureau; evidence material acceptance list from the municipal public security bureau and receipt issued by Wang; as well as the defendants' household registration certificates, audiovisual material, etc., are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on the afternoon of October 25, 2013, the defendant Pan, due to his girlfriend Wang breaking up with him and moving into housing arranged by Zhou, conceived the idea of setting fire to Zhou's home in retaliation. That afternoon, the defendant Pan colluded with the defendant Yu and Lu (handled in a separate case), brought gasoline, and used gasoline to ignite the residence of Zhou in a village under the jurisdiction of Longshan Subdistrict Office in a certain city, resulting in the destruction of Zhou's house and household appliances. According to the appraisal by the city's price certification center, the value of the damaged items was 6,415 yuan. Defendants Yu and Pan were apprehended and brought to justice on May 30 and July 16, 2014, respectively.", "label": {"Pan": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charges: On the evening of April 24, 2019, the defendants Huang and Hu, after premeditation, rode an electric tricycle and brought a crowbar to the old house of Zhou in a town in a certain city. Taking advantage of the absence of people, they used means such as prying with a crowbar to steal seven aluminum alloy doors and two aluminum alloy windows from the house, later selling the stolen goods for 665 RMB. According to the appraisal, the stolen property was valued at a total of 2,528 RMB. After the incident, the defendants Huang and Hu compensated the victim for the economic loss of 2,528 RMB. After being brought to justice, the defendants Huang and Hu truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts and voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang and Hu during the court trial and were substantiated by Zhou's statement as the victim, receipts, testimony of the witness Wei, identification records, photos, on-site inspection records, audiovisual material description, surveillance video, price verification appraisal, case development process, capture process, confessions of the defendants Huang and Hu, demographic information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm, as this court acknowledges.", "label": {"Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain area charged that on July 9 and 10, 2014, the defendant Xiao, either alone or in collaboration with the defendant Zhang, stole two electric bicycles in the territory of a certain area. Xiao's amount involved in the case was 5,481 RMB, and Zhang's was 3,115 RMB. The details are as follows: 1. On July 9, 2014, the defendant Xiao stole a Jinchi brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Sun from in front of the Golden Lily Hotel on Mingyuan Road in the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain area. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 2,366 RMB. 2. On July 10, 2014, the defendant Xiao and Zhang stole a Lima brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Li B from in front of the Project Department of Phase III of Greenland Century City on Fudi Road, Ecological New City of a certain area. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised at a value of 3,115 RMB. It was further found that on the afternoon of July 10, 2014, the Fucheng Road Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain area received a report from Li A, who stated that their Lima brand electric scooter had been stolen. Through investigation, Xiao was arrested and brought to justice on the afternoon of July 11, 2014. Based on Xiao's confession, the New City Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain area listed Zhang as an online wanted person. Zhang was arrested and brought to justice on July 15, 2014. After being brought to justice, the defendants Xiao and Zhang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft crimes. The family of the defendant Xiao has compensated the victim Sun for their losses. The public security authorities have recovered the Lima brand electric bicycle and returned it to the victim Li. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by the statements of the victims Sun and Li, the testimony record of the witness Yan who was not present in court, photographs identifying the theft locations, the list of seized items, the list of returned items, the price appraisal conclusion certificate, and the case-solving report, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city indicted: In the early morning of May 23, 2016, defendant Tao discovered a black briefcase on the back seat of a black Hyundai car parked by victim Gan in the underground garage of Anzhen Street, a certain district of a certain city. Tao then contacted defendant Chen and conspired to steal the briefcase. Chen later stole the briefcase, which contained over 2270 yuan in cash (RMB, hereinafter the same). On the evening of May 23, 2016, defendant Tao entered a black Honda car parked by victim Zhang in the underground garage of Anzhen Street in a certain district of a certain city by opening the car door and searched for valuables but did not succeed in stealing anything. On May 25, 2016, the public security authorities arrested defendants Tao and Chen. After being brought to justice, both defendants Tao and Chen truthfully confessed to their acts of theft. After the case was solved, victim Gan received 2260 yuan in compensation and expressed forgiveness towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tao and Chen during the court hearing, and were substantiated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution and examined and validated in court, including the \"Process of Solving the Criminal Case,\" \"Record of Seizure of Stolen Property,\" \"Seizure Decision,\" \"Seizure Inventory,\" \"List of Returned Items and Documents\" issued by Anzhen Police Station, Xishan Branch, Public Security Bureau of a certain city, criminal photography photos, statements by victims Gan and Zhang, call records, \"Letter of Forgiveness\" by victim Gan, confessions, identification records, and identification photos from defendants Tao and Chen, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tao": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shaoxing City accuses that at around 8:54 on September 24, 2015, police officers Shao from the Lizhu Police Station of a certain district in Shaoxing City went to \"NansXuan Knitting Factory\" in a village in a certain town of Shaoxing City to handle a police incident and lawfully summoned the defendant Liu, who was suspected of assaulting another person. Subsequently, the defendants Liu and Ma (the husband of Liu) resisted by punching and kicking, causing injuries to police officer Shao and auxiliary officers He A, Zhang, Xu, and Jin. Furthermore, it was found that after being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Ma both truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. There was no objection from defendants Liu and Ma during the trial, and the facts are corroborated by evidence including photos of injuries, shoe sole photos, case information of the police report, work ID, certificates, outpatient medical records, ultrasound examination report, CT report, DR diagnosis report, arrest process, testimonies of Hu, Zeng, He B, Wang, and statements from Shao, He A, Zhang, Xu, and Jin, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 14:00 on June 19, 2018, the defendants Wang and Pan, at Wang's residence located at Room 402, Unit 4, Building 8, Siheyuan Community, Wunan Town, a certain district, a certain city, sold a small packet of heroin weighing 0.08 grams to Shi. Around 20:30 on the same day, the two defendants were caught red-handed by public security personnel while again selling heroin to Shi at Wang's home. Subsequently, investigators discovered three small packets of heroin on the bed in Wang's bedroom, with a total net weight of 0.44 grams, drug money amounting to 200 yuan, and a \"Huawei\" mobile phone. A small packet of heroin weighing 0.07 grams, drug money of 400 yuan, and an \"OPPO\" mobile phone were found in a handbag carried by the defendant Pan. Six small packets of heroin, with a net weight of 0.18 grams, were found in Shi's possession. These facts are substantiated by the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the on-site inspection records and photos, witness testimonies, the identification records, the seizure list and photos, the weighing records, the inspection and appraisal report, call records, the drug handover receipt, and the confessions of the defendants, which were presented in court by the prosecution and verified to be true.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on October 25, 2018, at No. 29, Huangyanghe Street, Liangzhou District, in a certain city, the defendant Zhang sold five woven bags of poppy husks, which the defendant Wang had him sell, to Hou for 23,400 yuan. During the transaction, as pre-agreed, Hou paid a total of 25,400 yuan as drug money and an introduction fee. After receiving the drug money, Zhang refunded 400 yuan to Hou under the pretense of being an oil fee for transporting the poppy husks. Subsequently, Zhang paid Wang 20,400 yuan for the drug money. That night, when Hou was transporting the poppy husks to the vicinity of an intersection in a certain district of the city, he was caught onsite by the police, with a net weight of 22.9982 kilograms. Later that night, the defendants Zhang and Wang were arrested by the public security authorities. According to an appraisal by the Gansu Provincial Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center: opium alkaloids codeine, morphine, thebaine, papaverine, and noscapine were detected in all five samples of suspected poppy husks submitted for examination. The aforementioned facts are corroborated by evidence presented in court by the prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, witness testimonies, identification records, lists and photographs of seized items, weighing records, inspection and appraisal reports, the drug transfer receipt, and confessions from the defendants. All evidence has been verified as authentic through cross-examination.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charged that from January 7 to 9, 2015, the defendants Sun and Zhang successively stole five times from Watsons Supermarket, Starbucks Coffee, Likun Pharmacy, Finidi's Counter, and Sketch Men's Wear Counter at Kaihong Plaza, Donggang Street, a certain district. They stole four pairs of Watsons brand women's leggings and pantyhose (worth RMB 130), one 8oz Peach Blossom To-go Cup (worth RMB 95), one box of Beijing Tong Ren Tang Ejiao (worth RMB 429), three pieces of women's underwear (worth RMB 1077), as well as one sweatshirt and one knitted pullover (worth a total of RMB 2376), with the total value of the stolen property amounting to RMB 4107. On January 9, 2015, the defendants Sun and Zhang were apprehended by the police. After the incident, the defendants Sun and Zhang compensated the victims for all their losses. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Zhang during the court proceedings. Additionally, there are testimonies from witnesses Wang, Chen, Ma, Xiang, Zhou, Qian, and others, as well as WeChat chat records, identification records, search warrants and search records, price tags, purchase orders, expert opinions, surveillance videos, lists of seized and returned items, cash register slips, household registration information, and records of how they were apprehended, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting from October 2013, defendants Mei and Zhuang rented Unit F207 on the second floor of the front section of Decheng Comprehensive Market, 265-271 Yide Road in a certain district of this city, as the business location for \"Gang Fu Fang Trading Firm.\" They also rented the mezzanine on the first floor at 68 Haizhu South Road, Sanfuqian in the same district as a warehouse. Without possessing the \"Drug Business License\" or the \"Imported Drug Business License,\" they sold \"Huang Danyi Huo Luo Oil\" and other medicines that were imported and tested without approval. Defendant Mei was mainly responsible for selling counterfeit drugs in the shop, while defendant Zhuang fulfilled orders at the warehouse and delivered goods to customers. At around 3 PM on June 19, 2014, defendants Mei and Zhuang were caught red-handed at the said store. In the store, six boxes of \"Yian Tong Bao Ying Dan\" and one bottle of \"Hexing Huo Luo Oil\" were seized. In the said warehouse, a total of 1,877 boxes (or tubes or bottles) of 26 types of medicines, including \"Yu Yan Sang Bao Ying Dan,\" \"Fujio Oil,\" \"Children's Fortunate Cold Remedy,\" and \"Huang Danyi Huo Luo Oil,\" along with three sales receipts amounting to a total sales value of 4,050.5 yuan, were confiscated. The Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in Guangzhou Municipality identified all the seized medicines as counterfeit drugs. Defendant Mei and Zhuang raised no objection to these facts during the trial, which are supported by evidence such as photographs of the items involved, crime scene photos, delivery receipts, search records, and lists of items seized, lease agreements for the locations involved, arrest reports issued by the Food and Drug Crime Investigation Unit of a certain district branch of Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau, testimony from witness Zhang, confessions from defendants Mei and Zhuang, a certification opinion from the Food and Drug Administration of a certain district in Guangzhou, and the household registration materials of defendants Mei and Zhuang, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Mei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Shuangliu District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in July 2019, the defendants Chen and Jian promised to purchase bank cards from the defendants Xiong and Liang for 1,500 RMB each. Subsequently, the defendants Xiong and Liang obtained bank cards and USB security tokens from the Shuangliu Jialong Port Branch of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and handed them over to the defendants Chen and Jian. Defendant Chen then sent the bank cards to a higher-level accomplice for use, and the card was involved in fraudulent transactions amounting to over 200,000 RMB.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Yi and Liu had no objections to the criminal facts and charges brought by the public prosecution. Upon investigation, it was found that at around 6 a.m. on July 4, 2014, defendants Yi and Liu boarded a Qingfeng Xu bus heading in a certain direction from the Xinxian Village Service Center Station in Zhonggu Town, a district of a certain city, intending to commit theft. At around 7 a.m. on the same day, after transferring to the next Qingfeng Xu bus, near the back door, defendant Liu used a folding umbrella he was carrying to block others' view, while defendant Yi took the opportunity to steal 490 RMB in cash from the pocket of victim Cheng’s pants. After succeeding, the two immediately got off at the Xude Road bus stop, where they were subsequently arrested by waiting police officers. The stolen money was returned to the victim.\n\nFurthermore, it was found that defendant Liu truthfully confessed to the aforementioned theft after being brought to the case. It was also found that Liu was previously sentenced to two years in prison by Fengdu County People's Court in Chongqing City in March 1995 for an offense, and to six months in prison and a fine of 1,000 RMB by the former Luwan District People's Court of a certain city in February 2010 for another offense.\n\nThese facts are corroborated by victim Cheng's statement and identification records, the testimony and identification records of witnesses Jin and Jing, the confession and identification records of defendant Liu, the seizure warrant, list of seized and returned items issued by the Putuo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, an arrest report, a criminal judgment, online inquiry information from police business files, the defendant's household registration information, and other evidence verified in court, to which defendants Yi and Liu also confessed.", "label": {"Yi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around December 2017, the defendants Liu, Li, and Xu conspired in advance to rent room 201, building 21, area 5, Gangzhong New Village, Dagang Street, New District, in a certain location to set up a casino for personal profit, which they intended to split equally. Xu and Liu provided the venue and gambling equipment, Liu hired people to clean and cook, and Li was responsible for attracting gamblers. On February 26, 2018, when the New District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau inspected the location, they caught 12 gamblers on-site and seized gambling funds totaling RMB 23,010 and an illegal profit of RMB 5,740. On February 26, 2018, defendant Xu was summoned by the public security organs; defendants Liu and Li voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs on March 5 and March 6, 2018, respectively. After arriving at the case, all three defendants truthfully confessed the relevant facts. During the trial, defendants Liu, Li, and Xu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhao, Huan, Deng, Zhu, Wang B, Huang, Yang, Wang D, Xu A, Yan, Wu B, Zhang, Gong, Yin, Wang C, Zong, Xie, Wu A, Ge, Xu B, Wang A, and Liu A, who were cross-examined in court. The evidence further includes inspection and identification records, gambling equipment, gambling funds, money boxes as physical evidence, police registration forms, case acceptance forms, details of the arrest, item seizure and return lists, administrative penalty decisions, household registration data, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu, Li, and Xu, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts. The defense counsel for defendant Liu argued that Liu has the circumstance of voluntary surrender and has actively prepaid the fine, requesting leniency in sentencing and the application of probation.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of July 19, 2013, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Yu and Dong, in room 306 of the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel at No. 60 Danfeng Fourth Village, located in a certain district of a certain city, harbored drug users Xu, Zhang, and Cai to jointly consume the drug methamphetamine. It was further ascertained that on July 19, 2013, defendants Yu and Dong were apprehended in room 306 of the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel in a certain district of a certain city. The defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts during the court trial, and the evidence from witnesses Cai, Xu, Zhang, and Li, as well as the defendants' household registration provided by the public security authorities, the guest accommodation registration form from the Taosheng Yiju Business Hotel, the account of the arrest, the public security administrative penalty decision, inspection records, identification records, and on-site testing report, are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 19:00 on November 22, 2013, defendants Guo and Li went to the entrance of the stairway on the first floor of Unit 4, Building U3, Tianyu Apartments, Yinwan Garden, in a certain district of a certain city. There, they saw a black Suzuki King Star electric scooter (motor number: 1306295348, frame number: 20130569010, valued at 2,565 yuan) belonging to Liu that was parked without an anti-theft lock, and they stole it together. At around 13:00 on December 25, 2013, defendants Guo and Li were discovered by security personnel from the Shilin Hotel while attempting to steal an electric scooter in the dormitory area behind Shilin Hotel on North Bay West Road in a certain district of a certain city, and they were caught on the spot. After being apprehended, defendants Guo and Li truthfully confessed to their crimes. The above facts were not contested by defendants Guo and Li during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by the criminal judgment and release certificate, household registration certificate, witness testimonies, victim’s statement, defendants’ confessions, valuation and appraisal conclusions notice, site identification records, and identification site photos.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: On April 8, 2019, at approximately 3:00 p.m., defendant Wu arranged for defendant Liu and the victim, Zhou, to install elevator guide rails in a district of a certain city. When Liu and Zhou were installing at the 19th floor position, five elevator suspension wire ropes slipped from the fixed device on the counterweight side in the machine room, causing them to fall with the work platform to the bottom of the elevator shaft. Despite rescue efforts, the victim Zhou died, and defendant Liu sustained injuries, which were assessed as minor injuries of the first degree. Technical appraisal determined the cause of the elevator fall to be: 1. After the wire rope ends were combined, the split pin on the tapered sleeve was not removed in time, causing the wire rope ends to slip in the rope end combination; 2. The speed limiter and safety gear linkage device were ineffective. The \"4•8\" elevator installation injury general accident investigation team in the certain city's district recognized that defendant Liu, as an elevator installer, did not install the elevator equipment according to the elevator installation process requirements, violating the relevant provisions of article x of the \"Production Safety Law of the People's Republic of China,\" article x of the \"Special Equipment Safety Law of the People's Republic of China,\" and article x of the \"Regulations on Safety Supervision of Special Equipment\"; defendant Wu, as the main person responsible for the on-site elevator installation business contracted by Longhai Company, failed to adequately check the safety and identify hazards at the elevator installation site, did not timely detect safety hazards in the elevator installation site, and lacked sufficient safety education and installation skills training for the elevator installation personnel, violating the relevant provisions of article x of the \"Production Safety Law of the People's Republic of China\" and article x of the \"Special Equipment Safety Law of the People's Republic of China,\" and both bear primary responsibility for the occurrence of the accident. After the incident, defendants Liu and Wu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities upon telephone notification and truthfully confessed the facts of the case; defendant Wu has compensated the victim Zhou's family with 1.65 million RMB and obtained the family's forgiveness.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On November 30, 2013, at around 20:00, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu, after premeditation, went to the west side of the road by the construction site of Tianhong International Garden Community in Shengze Town, in a certain district of a certain city. They used a hacksaw to cut cable wires and other means to steal \"100*2*0.4\" model cable wires measuring 278.75 meters, which were valued at 5,784 RMB from a victim unit, a certain sub-bureau of a certain telecommunications bureau in a certain city. On January 16, 2014, Luo, Xu, and Hu voluntarily surrendered at the Oriental Silk Market Police Station of a certain district Public Security Bureau in a certain city and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. After the incident, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu jointly compensated the victim unit with 20,000 RMB. To substantiate the criminal facts of the above charges, the prosecution submitted relevant evidence, and based on this, believes that the actions of the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. The defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu are all principal culprits. The defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu all surrendered voluntarily. Please sentence according to the law. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Luo, Xu, and Hu during the court trial, and supported by evidence including testimonies from witnesses Gao, Zhu, Yang, Pan, identification transcripts, photographs, measurement records, a list of evidence, scene diagrams, a repair list, price verification conclusion, scene inspection transcripts, location maps, schematic diagrams, and a settlement agreement.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain city's district people's procuratorate charged: 1. On June 25, 2016, at approximately 4 am, the defendants Tan and Lu were at the foot of Building G, World Trade West City, No. 98 Donglu, University Road, in a certain district of this city. Lu acted as a lookout while Tan stole a red Xinri-brand electric bike (license plate: Nanning 721**) belonging to the victim Yao, which was parked there. The assessment determined that the vehicle was worth RMB 2880 at the time of the crime. 2. On June 26, 2016, at approximately 4 am, the defendant Tan stole a purple Xinri-brand electric bike (license plate: Nanning 9L2**) belonging to the victim Lin, which was parked in front of a Zhou Zhou Tin Foil Clam Vermicelli shop near the entrance of Guangxi University of Finance and Economics on Nongyuan Road in a certain district of this city. The assessment determined that this vehicle was worth RMB 2528 at the time of the crime. To substantiate the above facts, the prosecuting authority provided evidence such as the registration form for the criminal case acceptance, household registration certificate, basic information form of personnel, the arrest process, list of seized and returned items, list of evidence retrieval, on-site inspection report, administrative penalty decision, statement of circumstances, testimony of witness Teng, statements of victims Yao and Lin, confessions and defenses of defendants Tan and Lu, price assessment conclusion, identification record, on-site identification record and photos, on-site surveillance video, etc. The authority believes that the actions of the defendants Tan and Lu violated article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and that they should be held criminally responsible for the crime of X. During the trial, defendants Tan and Lu did not dispute the facts and charges in the indictment and voluntarily pleaded guilty. After reviewing the case, it was found that the prosecuting authority's charges against defendants Tan and Lu for the crime of X were clear, and the evidence was sufficient to confirm the charges. It was also found that the purple Xinri-brand electric bike involved in the case had been lawfully seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Lin.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on April 28, 2014, at approximately 16:00, the defendant Hu, without a license, was driving an ordinary three-wheeled cargo motorcycle with the license plate NingC××××× along Yinheng Road in a certain district of a certain city from east to west. At a location 50 meters east of a certain logistics overpass, he collided with the victim, Wu, who was riding an ordinary two-wheeled motorcycle with the license plate NingC×××××, also traveling from east to west along Yinheng Road. The collision caused Wu and his two-wheeled motorcycle to fall to the ground, whereupon the defendant Zhang, driving a light ordinary truck with the license plate NingA×××××, ran over Wu at the same location, resulting in Wu's immediate death and damage to the two-wheeled motorcycle. After the accident, both Hu and Zhang fled the scene. According to the determination by the Second Squadron of the Traffic Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of a certain district in a certain city, Hu and Zhang bear the main responsibility for this accident.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at approximately 10:00 p.m. on January 12, 2015, defendants Yang and Sheng were consuming at a S Benqing Bar at the intersection of Honghua Po Road and Shuguang Middle Road, Yuhua District, in a certain city. Due to dissatisfaction with the service provided by the waiter, the victim Zhou, they got into a dispute with him. During the argument, defendant Sheng punched the victim Zhou in the face, while defendant Yang hit the victim Zhou on the head with a beer bottle and punched him in the face, then fled the scene. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by victim Zhou constitute minor injuries of the second degree. On May 4, 2015, defendants Yang and Sheng reached a mediation agreement with victim Zhou, compensating him for his economic losses with 140,000 RMB and obtaining his understanding. On May 26, 2015, around 10:00 a.m., defendants Yang and Sheng voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendant Yang during the trial, and are evidenced by the case acceptance record provided by Zuojia Tang Police Station of Yuhua Branch, a certain city's Public Security Bureau, the statement regarding the retrieval of surveillance video, identification records and photos, the Forensic Medicine Human Injury Assessment Certificate No. [2015] 096 issued by (Yu) Gong (Wu) Jian (Falin), photos of victim Zhou's injuries, the mediation agreement, receipt and letter of understanding from victim Zhou, this court's (2008) Yu Xing Chu Zi No. 501 Criminal Judgment, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Moujia, Hu Mou, and Zhang Mouyi, the statement of victim Zhou, as well as the confessions and identity and behavioral materials of defendants Yang and Sheng, all sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tinghu District in a certain city charged that on September 3, 2013, at around 2 a.m., defendants Tang and Xu conspired and went to an animation city in the southern new district of the city. Defendant Xu kept watch while defendant Tang broke the lock to enter the premises and stole one Changsheng brand \"Fish World\" V109 fishing machine main unit and an extension board, one Changsheng brand \"Olympic Five Rings\" V211 fishing machine main unit, one Tianmin brand DVR4000H hard disk video recorder, and other items, with a total value of 35,245 RMB. After being apprehended, defendants Tang and Xu confessed to the aforementioned facts. To prove the facts of the charges, the prosecutor questioned the two defendants in court and read out and presented evidence such as the victim's statements, witness testimonies, a price appraisal opinion issued by the Price Certification Center of the city's Price Bureau, an explanation of the arrest circumstances of defendants Tang and Xu issued by the Southern New District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, and a list of seized and returned items.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In August 2020, the defendants Chen and Lin registered three gambling accounts and engaged in gambling on an online platform named \"Yongli International.\" Subsequently, after discussion, the two decided to recruit people to use these gambling accounts for the purpose of obtaining cashback on gambling funds' turnover. They recruited individuals such as Lin1 at a chess and card room on Huancheng South Road in Dinghai District to participate in gambling activities on the website. As of October 10 of the same year, the aforementioned accounts of the defendants Chen and Lin had a total betting amount of over 36 million RMB, with an effective betting amount of over 32 million RMB. The defendants Chen and Lin did not contest the above facts during the court hearing. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Lin1, Lin2, and Zhang; records of searches; onsite photographs; seizure decisions; lists of seized items; confirmation lists for the storage of involved assets; extraction records; identification records; mobile phone screenshots; electronic evidence inspection work records; mobile phone examination data; online extraction work records; administrative penalty decisions; household registration proofs; and the arrest process, which are sufficient for a determination.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City, Hubei Province accused defendant Zhu of hiding drugs in the bedroom of the rental residence, Room 402, Building 9, Kaixuan Mingdi Community, Jing'an Road, in a certain district of the city. On August 2, 2013, at around 3:00 PM, defendant Zhu called his girlfriend, defendant Chang, from downstairs in the community, asking her to bring down 1,500 hidden pills of \"Magu.\" Defendant Chang then took the drugs from the bedroom, wrapped them in plastic wrap, placed them in a cake box, and brought them downstairs. Both defendants Zhu and Chang were immediately apprehended by officer Gong. Officer Gong confiscated 8 packets of tablet drugs from the cake box on the spot and found a packet of granular drugs and a packet of powdered drugs in defendant Chang’s bag. According to the appraisal, the aforementioned tablet and granular drugs were identified as methamphetamine, weighing a total of 131.00 grams; the powdered drug was identified as ketamine, weighing 0.80 grams. Subsequently, officer Gong escorted the two defendants upstairs and found 8 packets of tablet drugs and 1 packet of powdered drug in their room. According to the appraisal, the tablet drugs were methamphetamine, weighing 165.22 grams; the powdered drug was ketamine, weighing 1,043.53 grams. These facts are confirmed by the evidence provided, including the apprehension and case-solving process issued by the public security organs; search records; seizure decision and inventory list along with photographs; drug test appraisal report; on-site test report; and the confessions of defendants Zhu and Chang.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that on the evening of September 13, 2014, defendants Liu, Li, Ma, and others went to the \"Heshunxiang\" restaurant on Heping West Road in the Economic Development Zone of a certain city to eat barbecue. During the meal, Li went to toast at Xu's table, who was also dining at the restaurant. Liu thought that Guo, sitting at the same table as Xu, was insulting Li, so he stood up and started to beat Guo, who was then pulled away by someone. As Guo walked east along the sidewalk of Heping West Road, he saw Liu and Ma following him, so he pulled out a dagger and drove Liu and Ma away. Later, Li, holding a steel bar, and Ma, holding a stool, beat Guo, who was pulled away by others. Liu then took the steel bar from Li and beat Guo again, causing Guo to sustain an open comminuted fracture of the middle segment of the left ulna. According to the appraisal, Guo's ulnar fracture was classified as minor injury level one. After the incident, Liu and Ma voluntarily went to the public security authorities to surrender and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. The three defendants reached a criminal reconciliation agreement with Guo, compensating him a total of 170,000 yuan for economic losses, and Guo expressed understanding of the actions of the three defendants. The above facts were undisputed by the three defendants during the court trial process, and were confirmed by the statements of the victim Guo, testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang and Xu, forensi", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 9:00 on April 24, 2015, officers from the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau, while initially understanding the conflict between Li's husband, Li A, and neighbor Zhao B, verbally summoned Li A and Zhao B to the Donglianhuayuan Police Station for a detailed investigation. During the forced removal of Li A, defendants Yang and Li (Li A's sister) knowingly obstructed Zhao A and others in their law enforcement duties by means of beating and pushing, despite being aware that Zhao A from the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau was lawfully executing his duties. As a result, Zhao A was injured, and the forensic examination by the Qianxi County Public Security Bureau determined the injury to be minor.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from approximately 20:00 to 22:30 on February 17, 2011, defendants Shao and Zhang, for the purpose of drawing illegal profits, used methods such as making phone calls and coordinating at intersections to gather individuals including Fang, Zhang Jia, Wang Jia, Lu Jia, Xiang, He, and Hu at the home of Lu Bing in a certain village, a certain street, in a city of Zhejiang Province, to gamble in the form of \"Bai Moumou.\" Lu Yi, Mao Jia, Mao Yi, Zhang Yi, and Lu Ding also arrived at Lu Bing's home to participate in the gambling. They were later caught on the spot by police officers from the Lanjiang Police Station of a certain city public security bureau, with over 210,000 yuan of gambling funds seized on site. On April 15 and September 23, 2011, defendants Shao and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs respectively. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court, recognized by this court: 1. The confessions and identification transcripts of defendants Shao and Zhang; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Zhang Jia, He, Lu Jia, Lu Yi, Wu, Mao Jia, Mao Yi, Xiang, Hu, Xu, Lu Bing, Wang Yi, Zhang Yi, Lu Ding, Pan, Ye, Jiang, and Fang; 3. Inspection records, onsite gambling case fund registration forms, lists of seized items; 4. Seizure decision documents, lists of confiscated items; 5. The process of surrender and self-surrender proof documents; 6. Household registration certificates of defendants Shao and Zhang, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: Around April 2012, defendants Cheng, Zhu, and Xu conspired to commit theft. Cheng and Zhu pre-planned to carry out the theft, with Xu specifically responsible for driving and transporting the stolen goods. In the early hours of April 15, 2012, the three defendants drove a van with the license plate SuE××××× from a certain city to the Xinwu Economic Development Zone in a certain county. After discovering a construction site of Wuhu DunAn Zhongyuan Co., Ltd., Cheng and Zhu got out of the vehicle and entered the site to steal 1,258 fasteners. They moved the stolen fasteners to a roadside several hundred meters away from the site and then called Xu to pick them up. While waiting for Xu, Cheng and Zhu entered the construction site a second time to steal more and were discovered, leading them to flee the scene. As Xu prepared to assist Cheng and Zhu, he was discovered near the site by a person named Zhou and others and awaited the police at the scene. According to a valuation appraisal, the stolen fasteners were valued at a total of 6,127 RMB. On April 18, 2013, defendant Cheng turned himself in to the police. On May 31, 2013, defendant Zhu also surrendered to the police. After being brought to justice, all three defendants truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng, Zhu, and Xu during the trial and were further corroborated by the testimony of witness Hong; statements from victims Zhou and Luo; documentary evidence including household registration information, details of the case, inventory records, and situation reports; an appraisal report from the price appraisal center of the county; and investigation and inspection records such as identification records, pointing-out records, and on-site inspection records. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 11:00 on August 12, 2016, police officers Dai, Wan, and Zhou from the Chengdong Police Station of the Hailing Branch of the Taizhou Public Security Bureau, bearing police identification and a summons warrant, lawfully summoned the defendant Sun, who was suspected of drug use, in a restaurant located in the Chengdong Street of Hailing District in this city. Defendant Sun refused to comply with the summons and assaulted officer Wan, punching him in the face. Seeing the situation, defendant Wei, in conjunction with defendant Sun, assaulted three police officers by pulling and shoving them, obstructing the officers from lawfully performing their duties, resulting in injuries to the neck and hands of the three officers. An assessment later determined that the injuries of victims Zhou and Wan constituted minor injuries. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Wei during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statements of victims Dai, Zhou, and Wan, testimonies from witnesses Zhai1, Yan, Zhu, Zhai2, and Zhai3, as well as the case registration form, forensic injury assessment report, medical diagnosis certification, examination records, on-site testing report, criminal judgment documents, materials related to release after serving the sentence, arrest records, video materials, and photographs, all of which are adequate to support the findings.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain Economic Development Zone charges: 1. At approximately 18:00 on September 24, 2015, defendant Cao, together with defendants Li and Wang, drove a vehicle to a certain location. At the local train station, defendant Cao pretended to be a civil affairs officer from the township where the victims resided, and defendant Li pretended to be Cao's driver. By claiming they would give the victims, Zhu and Liu, a ride home, they gained their trust and subsequently cheated Zhu out of 3,500 yuan and Liu out of 4,000 yuan. 2. At approximately 6:00 on October 2, 2015, defendant Cao, with defendants Li and Wang, drove to the local train station. Defendant Li pretended to be an employee at the township and a relative of a village Party branch secretary of the victim, while defendant Cao pretended to be Li's driver. By claiming they would give the victim, Dong, a ride home, they gained Dong's trust and subsequently cheated Dong out of 13,000 yuan. It was further found that defendants Cao and Li were responsible for selecting targets for fraud, while defendant Wang waited at designated locations. At the time of the incident, public security officers seized 420 yuan in cash from defendant Li, 69 yuan from Wang, and 200.5 yuan from Cao. During the trial, the relatives of defendants Cao, Li, and Wang compensated victims Zhu with 3,500 yuan and Liu with 4,000 yuan, gaining the victims' forgiveness. They also compensated victim Dong with 12,310.5 yuan. The relatives of defendants Cao, Li, and Wang paid fines of 5,000 yuan each on their behalf. These facts are not contested by defendants Cao, Li, and Wang during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the testimonies of victims Zhu, Liu, and Dong, identification records, crime discovery and arrest records, inventory of seized items, bank search records, surveillance footage, household registration proof, criminal judgment No. 808 from the criminal division of the Guan District People's Court of a certain province and city (200), criminal judgment No. 131 from the criminal division of the People's Court of Lankao County of a certain province (2013), as well as evidence of release upon completion of sentence, letters of forgiveness, and receipts, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accuses that, on November 21, 2014, at around 9 am, the defendants Zhou and Yang, after premeditation, were in Room 1001 on the 10th floor of Zhongsheng Hotel in this city. Zhou, under the pretense of needing a toothbrush, tricked the hotel maid into opening the door. Yang took the opportunity to hide in the shower of Room 1001. After Zhou and the maid briefly stayed in the room and then left, Yang stole 5,000 yuan in cash from the wallet of the victim Zhao. The two defendants split and spent the stolen money.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao, having lost money to Tong during gambling, suspected Tong of cheating during the games and sought to recoup their losses from him. On December 10, 2012, around 18:00, Lu and Shao encountered Tong in a village in Cicheng Town within this district and demanded to know why Tong had cheated during gambling. Tong denied the accusation and attempted to flee. The two stopped Tong from leaving and, around 19:00 that evening, took him to Room 303 of the Wenxin Hotel in the Hongtang Subdistrict of the district. In the room, the two continued to question Tong about the cheating and called Ge to join them. After Ge arrived, he vented his anger by hitting Tong with an ashtray from the room and then punching him. Under duress, Tong agreed to return the money to the three. After Tong wrote an IOU, they allowed him to leave around 21:00 that evening. On January 5, 2013, defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao turned themselves in to the public security authorities. To prove the aforementioned facts, the procuratorate submitted to the court the statements of the victim, Tong; documentary evidence, including details of provincial lodgings, the case-solving process, and basic population information; witness testimonies concerning the process of the defendants' arrival at the authorities; an expert assessment on the degree of physical injury from forensic medicine; and the confessions of defendants Lu, Ge, and Shao, among other evidence.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Shao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on May 12, 2015, at around 6:00 p.m., the defendant Chen, carrying drugs, went to the entrance of the \"Shizu Convenience Store\" on Shuixin Road, Shuixin Street, a certain district in a certain city, and sold three packages of drugs to the defendant Ye for 900 yuan. Subsequently, the defendant Ye, carrying the aforementioned drugs, went to a location near the Shuixin Market in a certain district in a certain city, and sold them to Wu for 1,200 yuan. Later, he was apprehended by the police and three packages of drugs were confiscated, along with a Samsung mobile phone, which was the criminal communication device seized from the defendant Chen. According to the evaluation, the total weight of the confiscated drugs was 2.46 grams, with methamphetamine components detected. The above-stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Ye and Chen during the court proceedings, and they are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu and \"A Hai,\" the physicochemical test report, the seizure warrant, the list of seized items and the return list, a situation statement, call records, the account of the arrest, identity verification materials, and records of prior offenses, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on the evening of March 4, 2014, the victim, Wang A, was deceived by Zhang (handled in a separate case) into coming to the Tianjin Tiens pyramid scheme den at No. 25, Fourth Floor, Second Row of the Bridge, Jinqiao Village, Fuchun Street, in this city from his hometown in a certain state under the pretext of a job introduction. The defendants, Ma, Guo, Chen, joined by Ding and Liu (both handled in separate cases) among others, illegally restricted Wang A's personal freedom by confiscating his mobile phone and watching over him in turns to force him to join the pyramid scheme organization. On March 9 of the same year, Wang A fell accidentally while trying to escape from the fourth floor by climbing along a water pipe to escape the surveillance and was rescued after seeking help from the public. As a result of the fall, Wang A sustained multiple fractures in the pelvis and thoracolumbar vertebrae. According to a forensic appraisal, Wang A's injuries are classified as minor injuries of the first degree. During the trial of this case, the defendant Chen entrusted his family to pay compensation of 5,000 yuan to this court. The aforementioned facts, to which the defendants Ma, Guo, and Chen raised no objections during the court hearing, are corroborated by Wang A's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Gong, Wang B, Wei, and Wu, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ma, Guo, and Chen, the on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, evidence list retrieved by the Fuyang Public Security Bureau, medical records copy, seizure records, seizure decision and list, photos, forensic appraisal on human injury degree and injury photos, the case background, explanatory notes, detention certificate, household registration certification, and other evidence, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the morning of September 12, 2016, defendant Zhang invited defendant Xu to have breakfast at the Xincun bus station in Zhenxiong County and suggested to Xu that they commit pickpocketing. Subsequently, the two defendants went to the streets to look for a target. At around 9 a.m. that day, while walking to the central park on Nandajie Street in Zhenxiong County, they saw a pedestrian, Zhai, place his phone into his breast pocket after making a call. Zhang instructed Xu to cover him while he committed the theft. They followed Zhai to the sidewalk near the Agricultural Bank in the central park on Nandajie Street. Zhang used a pair of tweezers he carried to steal a rose-gold \"VIVO\" brand smartphone from Zhai and handed the phone to Xu for safekeeping. According to the Zhenxiong County Price Appraisal Center, the stolen phone was valued at 2,480 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that in July 2017, the defendant Yang used an ID card with a canceled household registration and a false income certificate to fraudulently obtain a credit card from the Agricultural Bank of China Ningling County Branch, with an overdraft amount exceeding 10,000 yuan. Defendant Han, knowing that the ID card used by Yang had a canceled household registration, still provided a false income certificate for Yang, helping Yang fraudulently obtain a credit card from the Agricultural Bank of China. After the case was discovered, Yang repaid all the debts. To prove the above facts, the prosecution submitted to the court the confessions and defenses of the defendants, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, identification records, and photographs.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Han": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that defendants Li and Sun, after premeditation, on July 16, 2012, at approximately 11 a.m., near the Qingchun Wuhui Internet Cafe on Pingyang Street in a certain district of a certain city, with the pretense of cashing out a credit card for the victim Lü, deceived Lü into borrowing an Industrial and Commercial Bank of China credit card from another person. The two defendants used a Jilin Bank ATM to withdraw cash and purchase gold jewelry, extracting a total of 37,743 RMB from the card. The illicit funds obtained were completely squandered by the two defendants. After the crime, Sun's family compensated the victim Lü with 37,743 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Sun during the trial and were confirmed by the evidence such as the arrest record provided by the public security bureau, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, and identification records, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: On March 10, 2014, at around 17:00, defendants Xiao and Chen, together with Luo Mou-wen (handled in a separate case), went to a stall near the Changhe Town Cangtian Farmers' Market in Cixi City and stole a Samsung I9100 phone (valued at 1,530 RMB) from Zhao Mou's pocket. After being brought to justice, defendants Xiao and Chen both truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. After the incident, relatives of defendants Xiao and Chen compensated the economic loss of the victim, totaling 1,530 RMB, on their behalf. Defendant Xiao provided important clues to the public security organs, which led to the solving of other criminal cases. The above facts are not disputed by defendants Xiao and Chen during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by various evidence, including the victim Zhao Mou's statement, testimonies from witnesses Chen Mou and Wu Mou-hui, recognition records and photographs, receipts, meritorious service materials, decisions of public security administrative penalties, price appraisal reports, the account of the capture, and the identification of defendants Xiao and Chen. These are sufficient to establish the facts. Based on the aforementioned criminal facts and circumstances, the public prosecution agency recommends sentencing defendants Xiao and Chen to penal measures ranging from five months of detention to one year of imprisonment, along with fines.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that from April to July 2013, the defendant Zhang obtained a \"baccarat\" online gambling account from his superior \"Aqing\" (real name unknown, at large) and provided the betting codes to the defendant Wei. After receiving the codes from Zhang, Wei subsequently provided a total of 175,000 RMB in betting codes to Ying, Yu, Zhu, and others for gambling. Zhang illegally profited approximately 10,000 RMB from these activities, while Wei profited approximately 22,000 RMB. On July 30, 2013, Zhang and Wei were apprehended by local police officers, who seized 2 computers and 5 mobile phones on the spot. After the incident, Zhang reported the crimes of others, and this was verified to be true. These facts were not disputed by Zhang and Wei during the court trial and are supported by evidence, including documentary evidence extraction records, seizure orders, photos, bank transaction details, a criminal judgment, release certificates, population information, \"arrest procedures,\" and \"explanation of meritorious deeds,\" as well as testimonies from witnesses Ying, Yu, Zhu, Liu, and Tan, identification records, photo explanations, electronic evidence inspection records, and data CDs. This evidence is sufficient to conclude the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On August 15, 2015, at approximately 3:00 PM, the defendant Wang, after drinking alcohol, invited defendants Li, Zhou, and Chen to Jiangzhou Square Gas Station in Yangzhong City, where they arbitrarily assaulted the victims Jiang and Liu by punching and kicking them. According to the assessment, the injuries of victims Jiang and Liu were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li compensated victims Jiang and Liu for their losses and obtained their forgiveness. These facts were not contested by defendants Wang, Zhou, Chen, and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Jiang and Liu, the testimony of witness Mei, household registration documents, the case registration form, the case filing decision, the account of their arrival at the scene, identification transcripts and photos, explanatory notes, audio-visual materials, and the forensic bodily injury assessment report issued by the Evidence Appraisal Office of the Yangzhong City Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 11:00 pm on May 26, 2016, defendants Su and Xiao, carrying tools such as electric fishing machines and electric fishing rods, went to the prohibited fishing zone of the Lijiang River near a certain lodge on a certain road in a certain district of Guilin City to engage in electric fishing. At around midnight, they were apprehended by the patrol team of the First Squad of the Guilin Municipal Public Security Bureau's Lijiang Scenic Area Branch and found with one set of electric fishing equipment and 5 pounds of fish caught on the spot. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Su and Xiao during the trial proceedings. Furthermore, there is: 1. documentary evidence including household registration materials, the process of arrest, list of seized items, location map, announcements from the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China regarding the implementation of the Pearl River fishing ban system, the Guilin Municipal Government's announcement regarding the implementation of the Lijiang River fishing ban system, official letters and replies, situation statements, photos of tools used in the crime and the fish caught; 2. statements and defenses from defendants Su and Xiao; 3. records and photos of the seizure, site identification records, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Su": ["Detention"], "Xiao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from early June to mid-July and from late July to August 5, 2012, the defendants Zhang and Wang, together with Yu, Xu, Peng (A), Chen, and Li (all already sentenced), jointly set up a casino on the mountain in Shangjin Village and next to Shangjin Village Reservoir in a certain town of a certain city, organizing gambling in the form of \"Pai Gow.\" They arranged for Huang (A), Xiao, Tang, Zou, Xiang, Peng (B), and Huang (C) (all already sentenced) to collect commissions and serve as lookouts for the casino. During this period, the casino held two sessions daily, with more than twenty participants each time, yielding an average daily commission of over 3,000 yuan, totaling over 100,000 yuan in commissions. On June 18 and 19, 2013, the defendants Wang and Zhang successively surrendered to the public security authorities. After the incident, the defendant Zhang assisted the police in capturing a suspect. During the trial of this case, the defendants Wang and Zhang each returned illicit gains of 3,000 yuan and 7,000 yuan, respectively. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Zhang during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Luo (A), Yu, Chen, Peng (A), Li, Xu, Huang (A), Zou, Tang, Huang (B), Zheng, Luo (B), and others, along with the criminal identification records, receipts for returned illicit gains, criminal judgment documents of co-defendants, compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation decision documents, certificates of meritorious service, statements of surrender circumstances, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient for reaching a verdict.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 23:30 on October 20, 2014, at the intersection of San Dike Kou Creek Road and Huaihai Road in Suixi County, Huang, driving an Anhui F Honda Accord car, turned right from west to south when victim Zhang B stopped his car and insulted Huang. Defendant Wu, who was in the Honda car, had a dispute with Zhang B. Defendants Li and Yu came after hearing the news, and the three defendants injured Zhang B with fists and kicks. According to forensic identification, Zhang B's injury was determined to be minor injury level two. It was further found: On November 5, 2014, Wu, Li, and Yu compensated Zhang B for economic losses amounting to 85,000 yuan; both parties reconciled and executed the agreement, and Zhang B expressed forgiveness for Wu, Li, and Yu's actions. On November 12, 2014, defendant Wu was arrested by Huaibei City Public Security Bureau, and on November 14 of the same year, defendants Li and Yu voluntarily surrendered to Suixi County Public Security Bureau. After coming forward, the three defendants truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu, Li, and Yu during the trial and are confirmed by the situation registration form, the process of getting to the scene, household information, appraisal opinion, victim Zhang B’s statement, testimony of witnesses Huang, Zhang A, and Zhu, the agreement, and receipt, which are sufficient to establish.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On March 16, 2016, the defendant He learned that there was a package at the courier company where he worked, which required a cash on delivery of 3,800 RMB. He then conspired with the defendant Zhang to steal this package. At around 3 a.m. the following day, defendants Zhang and He went to the Yuantong Courier Company in Huajie Town, Yongkang City. Defendant Zhang climbed over the wall and entered the courier company's warehouse, while defendant He stayed outside the wall to assist, and they stole the package. They later delivered the package to the recipient and collected the payment of 3,800 RMB. Afterwards, defendant He received 2,300 RMB, and defendant Zhang received 1,500 RMB. After the incident, the families of both defendants each refunded 3,800 RMB to the courier company. The facts mentioned above were acknowledged by defendants Zhang and He during the trial, and are supported by the confessions of defendants Zhang and He, the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Yang, and Pan, the identification records and photos, the seizure order, the list and photos of seized items, the receipt, the letter of understanding, surveillance footage, population information, and the process of bringing the defendants to justice, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the charges brought by the People's Procuratorate of a certain place, between the end of May and early June 2015, the defendant Zhang, after losing money multiple times to Shi and others while gambling through Mahjong and \"Luo A,\" suspected Shi and others of cheating. On the afternoon of June 7th of the same year, after pre-arranging with defendant Wang and others, Zhang planned to first go to the Fat Sister's Home-style Restaurant on Lushan Street, Shengzhou City, to gamble with Shi and others that evening. Meanwhile, Wang would gather people to rush into the casino to help recover the more than 30,000 yuan lost in gambling, offering cigarettes as a reward. At around 8 p.m. on the same day, during the gambling session at the Fat Sister's Home-style Restaurant on Lushan Street, defendant Zhang called defendant Wang as previously arranged. Wang then led accomplices Zhou, Bian, Lu, Ma, Lou, and Zhu (a minor, dealt with in a separate case) into the restaurant, controlled those present, and used verbal threats and violence to force Shi and her boyfriend Jin to sign two blank IOUs and an IOU for 35,000 yuan. They also forcibly took Jin's car, a Ma A, valued over 102,000 yuan, as collateral, threatening to return the car only after payment. Additionally, Zhang and others forcibly collected 2,700 yuan in cash from Shi. After the incident, defendants Wang, Zhou, Lu, Ma, and Lou voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed to their crimes. Zhang's family has compensated the victim Shi with 5,000 yuan, and received forgiveness. The vehicle has been retrieved and returned to the victim. All defendants and their defense attorneys raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Shi and Jin, witness testimonies from Zhu, Luo, Xing, Qian, and others, identification records and photographs, inventory of seized and returned items, IOUs, a price assessment report, information on the case history, household registration certificates, and explanatory notes. Additionally, it has been found that defendant Ma has received forgiveness from victim Shi, with a letter of forgiveness included in the records.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Bian": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Lou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused the defendants Tao and Jiang. Due to trivial matters, Tao harbored a grudge against Yin and, in order to vent his personal anger, together with the defendant Jiang and Song (at large), went to the Century Garden Community in Rushan City at around 21:00 on May 24, 2014, wielding weapons to vandalize the sedan parked by Yin in the community. The damaged parts of the sedan were assessed to have a value of 7020 RMB.", "label": {"Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that from January 2012 to June 2014, the defendants Yang and Chen, as the director of the Respiratory Department and members of the department management team at Chengdu University Affiliated Hospital, negotiated with pharmaceutical representatives Yang Gang and Yang Cheng (handled in another case) to pay drug rebates based on the amount of drugs used in the Respiratory Department. Defendant Chen received drug rebates monthly. From January 2012 to June 2014, the Respiratory Department received a total of more than 600,000 RMB in drug rebates from pharmaceutical representatives Yang Gang and Yang Cheng. After receiving the drug rebates, the defendants Yang, Chen, and others discussed and distributed the rebate money to the department doctors. On July 16, 2014, the anti-corruption and bribery bureau of the local People's Procuratorate notified defendants Yang and Chen to report to the local People's Procuratorate for investigation. After the investigation, defendant Yang returned 72,000 RMB, defendant Chen returned 43,000 RMB, and other doctors from the Respiratory Department collectively returned 110,500 RMB. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses of the defendants in court.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early hours of August 9, 2015, the defendants Fan and Liu, together with Lin (handled in a separate case), went to the Hua Hao Huoli City store on Fuxibei Street in a certain city. They stole 36 stair treads made of steel plates and 24 pieces of steel plate scrap. Liu, Lin, and others sold the stolen stair treads and steel plate scrap that same night to a scrap collection station belonging to Chang Xin (handled in a separate case) in a certain village and place in the said city. According to an appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 4,905.98 yuan. The defendants raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, which are also corroborated by evidence such as surveillance screenshots of the theft, witness testimony, victim statements, identification records, the appraisal report, and the list of seized items, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of September 30, 2013, the defendants Long, Ceng, and Tang (handled in a separate case) conspired in the dormitory of the construction site of the Vanguard supermarket in Kaixuan City, Bao'an District, to enter the construction site through the ventilation opening to cut electric wires and sell them for money. After entering the construction site, the three cut three unused power cords, then stripped the wires in the dormitory, and together went to the roadside of Nanshan Daxin Village to sell the wires, obtaining illicit gains of 500 yuan. According to the appraisal, the stolen wires were worth 3,810 yuan. The site supervisor, Zhang, discovered that the cables had been cut, and by checking the surveillance, found that the electrician Ceng from the adjacent site was suspected of committing the crime. On October 8, 2013, Zhang located Ceng and talked to him, and Ceng admitted to the theft of the cables. Zhang's side then detained Long and the other three people who shared the dormitory with Ceng and later reported to the police. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by defendants Long and Ceng during the court trial, and there is relevant evidence verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that on June 4, 2013, the defendant Lv and the defendant Hu colluded and went to a room in the Mingdian Business Hotel near Shilong Railway Station in a certain city of a certain province to conduct illegal cash-out activities. The two used bank card information provided by others to clone bank cards and employed the bank POS machine provided by Wen Mouhua (handled in a separate case) to cash out a total of 1,000 yuan. On June 9, 2013, the defendants Lv and Hu, together with the accomplice Wen Mouhua, went to a room in the Xinhu Hotel in Shilong, a city of a certain province, and conducted illegal cash-out activities using the aforementioned method, cashing out a total of 6,000 yuan. On June 10, 2013, the defendants Lv and Hu, together with the accomplice Wen Mouhua and the \"Wuhan person\" (handled in a separate case), went to the aforementioned location and conducted illegal cash-out activities using the aforementioned method, cashing out a total of 6,000 yuan.", "label": {"Lv": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wenzhou accused: At the end of December 2014, defendants Feng and Ma, knowingly purchased stolen goods totaling around 700 pounds of stainless steel heads for over 3,000 yuan at a scrap purchasing point in a certain village of the Haibin Subdistrict, despite knowing they were stolen by Zhang (already sentenced). An appraisal determined that stainless steel heads of the same weight and quality are valued at 4,924 yuan. On March 7, 2015, defendants Feng and Ma turned themselves in to the public security authorities. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.", "label": {"Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that the defendants Du and Zhang, along with Wang A, Wang B (both handled in a separate case), the defendant Du's younger brother Du A (male, died at the age of 15), were originally employees of Dongyang Red Sun Electroacoustic Co., Ltd., residing in room 413 of the company's dormitory. Li (already sentenced), Yang A, Wen, Chen C (all handled in separate cases), and Chen A (name in the file) were also employees of the company and lived in room 416 of the company dormitory. On the evening of April 8, 2014, at around 11 p.m., the occupants of dormitory 413 were playing the stereo too loudly, disturbing others. After Li and Yang A's unsuccessful attempts to advise them, they entered room 413 with a broom handle and a kitchen knife to smash the stereo. After the stereo was turned off, Li and Yang A returned to dormitory 416.\n\nThat night, the defendants Du, Zhang, and Du A, along with Wang A went outside the factory to find Wang B and Li, intending to teach Li a le", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District in [a certain city] charges: 1. In the early morning of a day in early August 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of rental housing at No. 125-5 Jiuyan, Qianqing Town, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of hot-wiring to steal an electric scooter parked there by Tan. The stolen electric scooter was appraised to be worth 300 yuan. 2. One early morning in August 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of rental housing at No. 261B-2 Xianlai, Binshu Village, Hutang Street, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal an electric scooter parked there by Li. The stolen electric scooter was appraised to be worth 300 yuan. 3. In the early morning of a day in early September 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ren, after prior consultation, went to the entrance of Luyuan Food Store, Xiaoju Village, Huashu Street, Keqiao District, [a certain city], and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal an Innovation brand motor-assisted bicycle parked there by Zhou. The stolen vehicle was appraised to be worth 2,375 yuan. In summary, the defendants Yuan and Ren conspired to commit theft three times, with the total value of the stolen property amounting to 2,975 yuan. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Yuan and Ren during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the arrest process and situational statements provided by police officers from the Public Security Bureau of Keqiao District, [a certain city], shopping invoices, criminal judgments, certificates of release after serving sentences, testimonies from Li, Miao, Chen, and Feng, statements from Tan, Li, and Zhou, valuation conclusion reports, and identification transcripts by the defendants Yuan and Ren, which are sufficient to support these findings.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ren": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 3:00 PM on October 11, 2015, defendants Mao and Li, along with A Wan (handled in a separate case), brought the victim Liang, who owed gambling debts, back to a certain location in a certain sea after taking him from another place. They then illegally detained victim Liang in several hotels in the New Xiangzhou district of said sea city, including room 202 of Wenhua Hotel, room 8521 of Jinnuo Hotel, room 405 of Fengjing Hotel, and room 307 of Youpai Hotel, restricting his personal freedom and urging him to repay his debts. Around 9:00 PM on October 15, 2015, the public security organ arrested defendants Li and Mao in room 307 of Youpai Hotel and rescued victim Liang. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Mao and Li during the court trial, and were corroborated by the statements and identification records of victim Liang, details of the arrest, seizure order and inventory list, checkout slips and domestic guest registration form from Youpai Hotel, checkout slips from Wenhua Hotel, Jinnuo Hotel, and Fengjing Hotel, promissory notes, on-site photographs, and other evidence, which are sufficient to conclude the case.", "label": {"Mao": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On February 27, 2017, after the police from the Kangle County Public Security Bureau arrested Ma 1 and Ma 2, they confiscated a small packet of suspected drugs from Ma 1, weighing 0.4 grams. Upon testing, the substance was identified as heroin. Ma 1 and Ma 2 confessed that the drugs were purchased that day through Fan's introduction from an individual from Guanghe named Ma. The prosecution provided relevant evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.", "label": {"Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Qingshuihe charges: On December 6, 2018, in a certain county, defendant Kang opened a mahjong parlor with the intention of making a profit, charging fees and providing a venue for gambling for Wu and Qin (who has already been administratively punished) and others, conducting gatherings for gambling activities in the form of \"Push the Pair\" and \"Digging for Treasure.\" This was uncovered by the public security authorities, with 20 participants involved. Between March 2018 and September 2018, defendant Yang engaged in gambling by playing mahjong and Da A in the single-story house next to the county hospital in a certain county (Qingshuihe county) at a mahjong parlor he operated, where he accumulated a profit of 20,000 RMB. Defendant Yang had previously been administratively punished for gambling by the Public Security Brigade of Hohhot in 2013 and the Chengguan Police Station of a certain county in Qingshuihe in 2014. On December 6, 2018, defendant Yang was apprehended while participating in gambling activities at the mahjong parlor opened by defendant Kang in a certain county. The public prosecution agency submitted evidence to this court including the case registration forms for the crimes of defendants Kang and Yang, household registration documentation, lists of seized items, site inspection records, site diagrams, site photographs, examination records, site detection reports, witness testimonies, and transcripts of the defendants' confessions and defenses.", "label": {"Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that in December 2014, the defendants Lu, Jiang, Duan, and Xu jointly committed burglary in the Jiayuan Community of a certain development zone in the city, with a total of three incidents and a cumulative value of 2,150 RMB.", "label": {"Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Duan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It has been found through trial that in the early morning of November 24, 2019, defendants Tian and Wang, along with friends, consumed alcohol at the 1839 Bar on Qixin Road, Minhang District, Shanghai. Afterward, the hostess of the bar (the victim), Zhao, accepted an invitation to leave with Tian and Wang to continue drinking and chatting at Tian's residence located at XXX Room, XXX No., Shengxin Road, Juyuan New District, this city. At about 5 a.m., Wang and Tian, under the influence of alcohol, attempted to engage in sexual relations with Zhao (who sustained minor injuries according to the assessment) by slapping her face, restraining her body, and pulling her clothes, but stopped their criminal acts upon Zhao’s resistance. Subsequently, Tian kept Zhao in the room, undressed, exposed his genitalia, and demanded Zhao's cooperation while masturbating until ejaculation. At around 9:50 a.m., Zhao took the opportunity to leave Tian's residence and called \"110\" to report the incident. Tian and Wang were apprehended by the police in response to the report. After being caught, both defendants confessed to the main criminal facts. Now, their family members have compensated Zhao for her losses and obtained her forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tian and Wang during the court proceedings and are corroborated by evidence including the victim Zhao's statements, the case registration form, identification records, on-site investigation records, search records, list of seized and returned items, collected evidence list, working conditions and screenshot photos, injury examination notice, medical records, inspection reports, appraisal and judicial opinion, relevant receipts and letters of understanding, as well as the defendants' confessions and household registration information, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3 p.m. on October 23, 2013, Xu contacted defendant Xiao via SMS to request the purchase of drugs, to which defendant Xiao agreed. Subsequently, defendant Xiao asked her boyfriend, defendant Yu, to contact others by phone to purchase drugs. Defendant Yu, knowing that defendant Xiao intended to sell the drugs, still purchased a packet of drugs from someone else for over 300 RMB and consumed a portion of it. At around 4 p.m. that same day, defendant Xiao took the remaining drugs to the entrance of a restaurant at the back of General Hotel on Jingshan Street in Ouhai District, a certain city, and sold the drugs to Xu for 500 RMB. After the transaction, the police apprehended defendant Xiao at the scene and seized the drugs involved in the transaction and one mobile phone used as a crime tool. Upon analysis, the drugs were found to weigh 0.84 grams and contained methamphetamine. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yu and Xiao during the trial, and they are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Hu, Xu, and Zhou; inspection records; physicochemical test reports; seizure lists and photos; drug custody certificates; call records; explanatory notes; personal safety check registration forms; public security administrative penalty decisions; arrest details; and the defendants' personal information, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On November 16, 2013, the defendant Li, under the instruction of the offender Lin (to be handled separately), introduced the defendant Zhang to work as a waiter at the Little Sheep Restaurant on Renmin South Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, with the intention of stealing others' credit card information. The defendant Li handed the card reader mailed by the offender Lin to the defendant Zhang. During work, the defendant Zhang took the opportunity while customers were paying bills to use the card reader to steal customers' credit card information and recorded the last four digits and withdrawal passwords on a piece of paper. The defendant Li then mailed the card reader with the victims' credit card information copied by the defendant Zhang to Lin. On December 24, 2013, the police arrested the defendants Zhang and Li and found a card reader used for the crime and a piece of paper recording credit card information at the defendant Zhang's residence. Investigation revealed that the defendant Zhang recorded information and passwords of others' credit cards on the paper for a total of 22 accounts, with 5 cardholders confirming the above credit card information. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution submitted the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: one card reader; 2. Documentary evidence: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, recruitment resume, labor contract, courier receipts, paper, credit card information statistics, bank card account opening documents and transaction details, explanation of circumstances, etc.; 3. Witness testimonies: testimonies of witnesses Lin, Lin, Shan, Wan, Li, and Zhu; 4. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Li; 5. Audio-visual materials and electronic data: electronic data of transaction records from the POS terminal involved in the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of May 23, 2016, defendants Sun and Chen went to Dormitory 219, 532, 540, and 546 in the construction workers' dormitory area \"Zhongkai City Light\" of a town in the city. Using methods such as cutting locks with pliers, they stole one \"Samsung\" phone (valued at 560 RMB) and a gold ring from Wang, 60 RMB from Bu, 80 RMB from Shao A, and 600 RMB from Shao B, with the total stolen property amounting to 1,300 RMB. After the incident, all losses to the victims were recovered except for the gold ring. After being brought to justice, defendants Sun and Chen confessed truthfully to the above criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Sun and Chen raised no objections to these facts. The statements of victims Wang, Bu, Shao A, and Shao B; the testimony of the witness Jia; identification records; photos; search records; seizure list; seizure records; list of returned items; list of retrieved evidence; audiovisual material descriptions; surveillance videos; price certification report; situation explanations; investigation documentation; arrest records; the confessions of defendants Sun and Chen; criminal judgment; administrative penalty decisions; population information; and criminal personnel information all provide sufficient evidence to support and confirm this court's findings.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Henan Province charges: On June 12, 2015, at around 17:00, due to an economic dispute, the defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu detained the victim Xu's vehicle, mobile phone, and other items at the east highway entrance of a certain city. They forcibly drove Xu from this city to the downtown area, a certain town, and other places within the city. On June 13, 2015, at around 21:00, near a gas station in the southern area of the city, Xu took the opportunity to escape while using the restroom. The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Henan Province proposes the following sentencing recommendations: Defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, and Bao have confessed and are first-time offenders; it is recommended that each of these defendants be sentenced to three to four months of detention. Defendant Liu surrendered himself and is a first-time offender; it is recommended that he be sentenced to two to three months of detention. The above facts and sentencing recommendations are undisputed by defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu during the court proceedings. These are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang, Zhao, Li, Bao, and Liu; the statement of the victim Xu; photos; appraisal documents; return certificates; proofs; IOUs; letters of understanding; household registration information; prior conviction proofs; case process records; investigation reports; and other evidence, which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Zhao": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"], "Bao": ["Detention"], "Liu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: From October 2015 to October 8, 2016, defendants Zhou and Xu lured local residents such as Xu Mou, Pan Mou, and Sang Mou to gather for gambling in the form of \"Flipping Huanglong\" using hard cards at a shop operated by defendant Xu in Dayun Village, Cangda Road, in a certain town of a certain city. They profited by taking a cut from the gambling. Defendants Zhu and Wu sat at the corner of the table multiple times, managing the funds and gaining profits from it. Investigation revealed that defendants Zhou and Xu illegally gained a total of 20,000 RMB, defendant Zhu gained 7,000 RMB, and defendant Wu gained 3,000 RMB. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu confessed to their crimes truthfully. During the trial, all four defendants prepaid their illegal gains to this court. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu during the court hearing, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu Mou, Pan Mou, and Sang Mou, along with the decisions of public security administrative penalties, lists and photos of seized items, the capture process, and identity proofs of defendants Zhou, Xu, Zhu, and Wu, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiangbei District accused: On July 12, 2013, at approximately 1:30 a.m., defendants He, Fang, Jin, and Peng (handled in another case) were drinking and entertaining at Xin Jingu KTV located at No. 4 Zhengda Road in this district. They unjustly assaulted the victim, Lu, who was working on audio control at the KTV, by means of punching, kicking, and hitting with beer bottles. This resulted in the victim suffering a cerebral contusion, right-sided subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and left temporal bone fracture, thus constituting minor injuries.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around midnight on September 8, 2013, defendants Zou and Huang, instigated by accomplices Zou C (already sentenced) and Zou B (handled in another case), along with Fei, Lin, Zou A (all already sentenced), and others, carried weapons such as knives and sticks and broke into the employee dormitory of Lipeng Shoe Factory in District 4 of the Maanqiao Village, Hengfeng Street, of a certain city. There, they assaulted the victim, Deng, causing him serious injury. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence to this court.", "label": {"Zou": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: 1. Around 18:00 on a day in late August 2014, defendants Huang and Zhang, after premeditating, went to an open area by a bridge in a village of a certain town in the county. Defendant Zhang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Huang stole a blue \"Fengfan\" brand electric tricycle parked there by Chen. According to an appraisal, the tricycle was valued at 3,676 RMB. 2. At around 22:00 on September 2, 2014, defendants Huang and Zhang, after premeditating, went to an alley near a factory at 168 New Street, Linqu, Kunyang Town in the county. Defendant Zhang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Huang stole a purple \"Qilekang\" brand electric tricycle parked there by Wang. According to an appraisal, the tricycle was valued at 1,075 RMB. After the crime, the two stolen electric tricycles were recovered and returned to their original owners. Additionally, it was found that after defendant Huang was brought to justice, he assisted the public security organs in capturing another perpetrator. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Zhang during the court trial, and are supported by their previous confessions, the statements of the victims Chen and Wang, testimony from the witness Wei, on-site inspection records, search records, identification records, price appraisal documents, seizure decision and lists, evidence retrieval notices, return lists, household registration information, details of capture, explanatory notes, and criminal judgment documents, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate charged that on June 14, 2016, at around 11 am, defendants Zhang and Gu went to a clothing wholesale market in a certain district of a certain city and stole a pair of men's leather shoes, a women's top, a pair of women's underwear, and a pair of women's trousers. According to an appraisal, the stolen items were valued at 158 RMB. On June 22, 2016, at around 10 am, Zhang and Gu stole three men's T-shirts, a pair of women's leather shoes, and a women's coat from the same location. The appraisal valued these stolen items at 318 RMB. On a day in mid to late June 2016, Zhang stole four men's T-shirts from the same place. The appraisal valued these items at 280 RMB. On June 27, 2016, at around 10 am, Zhang and Gu were caught red-handed by the staff while stealing at the same location. Zhang participated in thefts 4 times, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 756 RMB, while Gu participated in thefts 3 times, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 476 RMB. The public prosecution agency provided to this court documentary evidence; witness testimonies; the defendants' confessions and defenses; appraisals; audio-visual materials, electronic data and other records to support their charges.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of the Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: 1. At approximately 3 a.m. on June 17, 2014, defendants Ya and Luo, along with another individual, went to Room xx, Unit x, Building ××, ×× Community, Yu×× District, a certain city. The other individual unlocked the door of the residence of the victim, Lu Moumou, using a shim. Ya entered and committed theft while Luo kept watch, stealing 200 Hong Kong dollars, of which 100 Hong Kong dollars have been recovered, and the remainder was squandered. 2. At approximately 5 a.m. on June 17, 2014, defendants Ya and Luo, along with another individual, went to Room xx, Unit x, Building ××, a community in a certain district of a city. The other individual unlocked the door of the home of the victim, Chen Mou, using a shim. Ya entered the room to carry out the theft while Luo kept watch, stealing 500 yuan in cash and a Samsung cellphone. The Samsung cellphone was taken by the third individual, and the cash was completely squandered. In summary, defendants Ya and Luo committed residential burglary twice. After investigation and surveillance, public security personnel apprehended defendants Ya and Luo on June 23, 2014, in a city of a certain region. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Ya and Luo during the trial and are supported by the following evidence presented in court: the case registration form, the decision to file a case, the certificate of compulsory measures, the seizure list, statements from the victims Lu Moumou and Chen Mou, confession materials from defendants Ya and Luo; the identification records and photos of defendants Ya and Luo, the price appraisal report and the appraisal opinion notification, the detailed report and related statements of solving the case, and the household registration certificates of defendants Ya and Luo. The facts of this case are clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient, and it is enough to establish a conviction.", "label": {"Ya": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that, starting in 2012, the defendant Yang received bets for the Mark Six lottery from the defendant Zheng via telephone and settled funds through bank transfers. Beginning in March 2014, the defendant Zheng received Mark Six lottery bets from individuals such as Dong and others through telephone, SMS, and WeChat at his home at 135 Puxi Street, Jiangbei Subdistrict, in a certain county, and reported them to defendant Yang, making a profit from the rebate difference. By the time defendant Zheng was apprehended by police on September 28, 2014, he had received Mark Six lottery bets totaling more than 110,000 yuan, and defendant Yang had received bets totaling approximately 290,000 yuan. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence for the facts alleged above.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On the evening of March 26, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, without approval, unlawfully brought chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village, a town in a certain city, to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. Afterwards, Peng drove a truck with license plate AXXXXX from a certain place to transport the felled trees to a town in a certain city, selling them to Lin Moujia, the owner of a local timber processing factory, at a price of 20 yuan per 100 jin. On the evening of March 27, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, and Li carried chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. Afterwards, Peng drove the truck from a certain place to transport the felled trees to the town, selling them to Lin Moujia at the same price. On March 28, 2016, the defendants Peng, Gan, and Li once again carried chainsaws and other tools to the forest area of Cendou Village to cut down acacia and masson pine trees. The three were later caught by local villagers and handed over to the public security authorities. According to the appraisal by the Fujian Nanfang Judicial Appraisal Center, the total standing stock volume of the aforementioned felled trees was 16.8113 cubic meters, with a value of 6,270.17 yuan; among them, the standing stock volume of trees felled on March 27 and March 28, 2016, was 9.7934 cubic meters, valued at 3,803.49 yuan. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented corresponding evidence to the court through evidence presentation and cross-examination.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that at approximately 12:50 a.m. on August 24, 2014, the defendant Zhang, in collaboration with the defendant Du, Meng A (deceased), and Meng B (handled in a separate case), had a conflict with a resident of a certain township in a certain county named Chen due to a trivial matter while eating at a barbecue stand across from the Shengshi Cake Shop in Yong'an Community, a certain town. They then jointly assaulted Chen. On December 15, 2014, the county's First People's Hospital Forensic Identification Institute assessed that Chen sustained minor injuries of the second degree. The facts determined by this court's trial are consistent with the facts charged by the prosecution and are corroborated by evidence, including confessions by defendants Zhang and Du, statements by the victim Chen, testimonies from witnesses Liu, Dong, Wang, Lei, and Jiang, an explanatory note, a death certificate, injury photos of Chen, a household registration certificate, an expert opinion, identification records, the case source, the process of apprehension, a mediation agreement, a receipt, inquiry transcripts, and an investigation and evaluation opinion document.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Du": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on May 21, 2016, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Ji and Ma conspired together in Room 205 of a certain hotel on Fengshan Street in this city to purchase 5 small packets of heroin from an unknown woman for 2,000 RMB. On the 23rd of the same month, at around 10:00 PM, defendants Ji and Ma conspired together in the aforementioned Room 205 to sell one of the small packets of heroin to a person referred to as Hei A for 340 RMB. After purchasing the heroin, Hei A consumed part of the drugs on-site in the aforesaid Room 205, and kept the remaining heroin in his clothing pocket. On the same day, police officers apprehended defendants Ji, Ma, and Hei A on-site in Room 205 and discovered 6 small packets of heroin (with a net weight of 3.3158 grams) and 340 RMB in defendant Ji's bag, as well as 1 small packet of heroin (with a net weight of 0.0706 grams) in the possession of Hei A. An evaluation confirmed that the confiscated substances contained heroin. During the trial, defendants Ji and Ma did not dispute these facts and there is sufficient corroboration from documents such as the seizure warrant, seizure list, temporary receipt for funds, narcotics handover list, photographs, administrative penalty decision, population information, \"account of the arrest,\" witness testimony from Hei, inspection certificate and records, identification record and photos, physicochemical examination report, and the on-site testing report.", "label": {"Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that in May 2016, the defendants Qin and Tang, together with Zhang and Deng, jointly purchased the eucalyptus trees from the \"Mahuangtang\" mountain field in Zhupinglong Village, a township of a certain city, which were contracted by Huang A and five others, for a price of 180,000 yuan. In March 2017, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, the defendants Qin and Tang hired Liang and four others to partially cut down the eucalyptus trees in the mountain field. The timber was sold in five separate transactions to the Zhongfang Taige Lin Paper Mill, yielding a total of 20,933 yuan from the sales. According to an assessment, 669 eucalyptus trees with a standing timber volume of 37 cubic meters were cut down in the \"Mahuangtang\" mountain field in Zhupinglong Village. After the incident, the two defendants voluntarily surrendered to the public security authority and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts of illegal logging. The facts of the above charges were not disputed by defendants Qin and Tang during the court hearing. Supporting evidence includes household registration and resident information, explanations of voluntary surrender, the Zhongfang County Taige Lin Paper Mill timber sales registration form, receipts, forest, forest tree, and forest land status registration form, boundary map of forest, forest tree, and forest land, certification from the city's Forest Resource Management Station, forest land lease contract, community correction investigation and assessment report, testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Deng, Huang, Li 1, Qin 2, Bao, Yang, Qin 3, Liang, Liang 2, Zheng, Li 2, and Tang, site inspection records, schematic diagrams, and onsite photos from the public security authority, and the forestry forensic appraisal report by the Huaihua Xingri Judicial Appraisal Institute, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that at noon on December 1, 2015, the defendants Ying, Chou got into a dispute over business-related trivialities with the victim Qian, who was at a neighboring stall in front of stalls 6-7 at the Dongliu market for fresh produce in the Jiangdong District of this city. This led to a physical altercation, during which the defendants Ying, Chou injured the victim Qian. Forensic evaluation determined that the victim Qian suffered fractures to the right 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th ribs due to the trauma, with chest injuries reaching the level of minor injury of the first degree. Additionally, it has been found that the defendant Ying was summoned to the case on January 12, 2016, and defendant Chou on January 13, 2016. After the incident, defendant Chou reached a settlement with the victim Qian and agreed to civil compensation, and the victim also requested leniency for both defendants. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim Qian's statement and identification records, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Wang, Xie, Xu, and Ding, the settlement agreement, hospital medical records, details of the defendants' appearance in court, household registration certificates of Ying and Chou, video discs, and the forensic assessment of bodily injuries, sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Ying": ["Imprisonment"], "Chou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on a day around April 26 or 27, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang, along with Guo (already convicted) and others, stole mobile power banks and other items in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. On a day around April 29, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang stole 6 memory cards and 1 mobile power bank in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. At around 4 a.m. on April 30, 2013, the defendants Tian and Wang, along with Guo and others, stole headphones, mobile power banks, and other mobile accessories in the back warehouse of Lenovo Mobile at Suning Appliance, No. 60 Changjiang Street, a district in a certain city. According to the appraisal, the total value of the above-mentioned items was 10,778 yuan. Two headphones, one Bluetooth earphone splitter, and one data cable stolen by the defendant Wang were seized and returned to the victim unit. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Tian and Wang during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Feng; the confession of the co-defendant Guo; the No. 189 appraisal conclusion certificate (2013) by Shen from the Price Appraisal Center of a district in a certain city; the recognition record; the seizure list and return list; photos of physical evidence; screenshots of surveillance footage; the detailed list of stolen items; audiovisual materials; the criminal judgment; population information sheet; phone inquiry records; case source; and confession materials and other evidence, sufficient to establish the allegation.", "label": {"Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at noon on October 4, 2014, the defendants Yin and Liu were drinking at the Fat Auntie Hand-Pulled Noodle Restaurant at the bridgehead in a certain city. During this time, the two discussed eating at Zhao's Wuji Noodle Shop without paying after they had drunk. At around 3 p.m. on the same day, Liu and Yin arrived at the Wuji Noodle Shop one after the other. Liu, without any reason, started causing trouble, and the two of them slapped the tables in the noodle shop. Liu overturned a table to the ground. When Zhao saw this, he approached to dissuade them, and then an argument and fight ensued between Zhao and Yin, while Liu wantonly smashed tables, chairs, bowls, and dishes in the noodle shop. During the fight between Yin and Zhao, Yin used a stool to injure Zhao's right rib and other areas. According to the assessment, Zhao's injury was classified as minor injury level two. On December 22, 2014, the families of the defendants Yin and Liu reached a mediation agreement with Zhao. The families of Yin and Liu compensated Zhao for medical expenses, lost wages, and other losses totaling 33,000 yuan. Zhao expressed understanding towards Yin and Liu and decided not to pursue criminal responsibility against them. The above facts were also undisputed by the defendants during the court hearing, and they were supported by the defendants' confessions, the victim's statements, witness testimonies, the case registration form from the city Public Security Bureau, the decision to file the case, identification transcripts and site photos, the judicial appraisal report, the agreement, the letter of understanding, proof of prior offenses, and household registration proofs, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that since August 2013, the defendant Wang rented a storefront near the south gate of Oriental Mingjing in the Xinzhan District of this city to open a gambling machine den for gambling activities. In November 2013, Wang hired the defendant Zhao to manage this gambling den. On November 21, 2013, the gambling den was raided and sealed by the public security authorities, with 9 gambling machines and 14 operational units of a gambling nature confiscated on site. Furthermore, it was found that on November 21, 2013, when the police sealed the gambling den, defendants Wang and Zhao were brought in for questioning. The confiscated gambling machines were destroyed by the public security authorities on December 12, 2013. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Wang and Zhao during the trial, and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Li and Dong, inventory of seized items, on-site inspection records and photographs, the certification of electronic gaming equipment with gambling functions, the administrative penalty decision by the Xinzhan Branch of Hefei Public Security Bureau, destruction records, household registration information, the account of the case resolution, and a certificate issued by a certain vocational college in a certain area, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accuses: In early May 2015, defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao set up 19 \"Star 97\" gambling machines in two houses next to the old highway administration station in Jianping Town, Langxi County for the purpose of gambling. They had Wang sign a house rental agreement with the landlord, Wu, in his name and a transfer agreement with the former operator of the gaming room, Yu. They employed Qian and \"Big XX\" to assign points to gamblers and recruited Qiu to cook meals for the gamblers. After some time, Fang and Gao withdrew from the operation, leaving Tong to continue managing the gaming room alone. On July 13, 2015, the gaming room was raided by Langxi County Public Security Bureau. During the period of operation, the gaming room did not make any profit after covering various expenses. Defendant Tong was arrested and brought to justice on July 26, 2015. On September 8 and September 14, Gao and Fang surrendered themselves. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, Langxi County Public Security Bureau seized the 19 gambling machines involved in the case. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty. There is sufficient evidence to confirm the facts, including household registration documents, inspection records and photographs, seize orders, seizure lists and photographs, testimonies from witnesses Qian, Wang, Qiu, Wu, Shi, and Yu, and the statements and defenses of defendants Tong, Fang, and Gao, the process of arriving at the case, the criminal judgment document, among others.", "label": {"Tong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area indicted that on the afternoon of September 17, 2017, defendants Sun and Zhao assisted the victim, Gao, in washing ginseng seeds at a ginseng seed washing factory beside the Yingfu Highway in a certain town. After the ginseng seeds were washed and bagged, the two defendants noticed a basin of washed ginseng seeds that no one claimed. After discussing, the two defendants put the ginseng seeds into a woven bag and loaded them onto defendant Sun's Jetta car. Defendant Sun then took the ginseng seeds to defendant Zhao's home. Later, the victim Gao discovered the loss of the ginseng seeds and contacted defendants Sun and Zhao. The two returned the ginseng seeds to victim Gao and voluntarily surrendered to the Jingyu County Public Security Bureau. Upon appraisal, the stolen ginseng seeds weighed a total of 28 pounds, with a value of 5,880 yuan.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of May 8, 2015, the defendant He, knowing that the electric tricycle was a stolen vehicle, acted as an agent to sell the vehicle. The defendant Chen, knowing that the vehicle was improperly obtained by the defendant He, purchased it at a low price of 2,000 yuan. According to the appraisal, the vehicle's value is estimated at 4,367 yuan. Upon investigation, it was confirmed that the vehicle belonged to the victim, Wang, and was stolen in the early hours of May 7, 2015, from a rental house in a village on Feiyun Street in the city. After the incident, the vehicle was recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants He and Chen during the court hearing and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xie, Jiang, and Li, the statement of the victim Wang, the price appraisal report, the identification record, the arrest process, payment receipt, criminal judgment document, release certificate, criminal record information, mobile phone call details, seizure list, return list, mobile phone photos, and population information, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"He": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality charges that on the evening of May 13, 2014, drug purchaser Zhou called the defendant Huang, stating he wanted to buy drugs. Huang then instructed his wife, defendant Ceng, to proceed with the transaction. At around 22:00 that evening, Ceng brought drugs to the entrance of a convenience store on Lianhua Road in a certain area, selling 0.6 grams of drugs (identified as methamphetamine after examination) to Zhou for 300 yuan and then fled the scene. At around 1:00 on May 14, Zhou again called Huang, and Ceng answered the phone. Zhou expressed his intention to purchase drugs, and Huang again instructed Ceng to proceed with the transaction. Subsequently, Ceng came to the entrance of a convenience store and sold 0.46 grams of drugs (identified as methamphetamine after examination) to Zhou for 200 yuan, before being captured and brought to justice. At around 21:00 on May 29, Huang was also captured and brought to justice. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Huang and Ceng during the trial. These facts were sufficiently confirmed by evidence such as the apprehension process, extraction records, seizure records, seizure warrant, seizure list, population information, call log, criminal record materials, testimonies from witnesses including Zhou, defendants' confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, scene investigation records, and photographs.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on April 28, 2013, at approximately 9:00 a.m., defendants Hu and Mo conspired to commit theft. At the Zhaodong Meat and Vegetable Wholesale Market in Chancheng District, Foshan City, Mo was responsible for acting as a lookout and providing cover, while Hu stole a purple wallet from the net bag under the handle of victim Cai's baby stroller. After the theft, defendants Hu and Mo were apprehended by police while attempting to flee the scene. The police confiscated the stolen wallet from defendant Hu on-site, which contained 94 yuan. After the case was solved, the public security agency returned the recovered stolen money and goods to the victim, Cai. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Mo during the court hearing. These facts are supported by evidence, including the victim Cai's report, the list of seized and returned items, photographs of physical evidence, the details of the arrest, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment No. 516 of (2012) from a certain city court's first criminal trial, the certificate of release upon completion of the sentence, and the statements and identification records of defendants Hu and Mo during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Bao, entrusted by Wang, gathered defendants Wei, Huang, and Yu (handled in a separate case) to collect a debt from the victim Luo. On April 27, 2014, around 3 PM, Bao, under the pretense of discussing business, lured Luo in front of a KFC in a certain district of a certain city into the car he was driving. Together with Wei, Huang, and Yu, who boarded the car shortly after, they took Luo to a room belonging to Wei in a village of a town in that district and then to an abandoned farm on a mountain opposite the Guangxi Sports Center (behind a certain garden) for detention. They forced Luo to contact family and friends to repay a debt of 820,000 yuan. It wasn't until around noon on May 1, 2014, that Luo was released. On April 30, 2015, the defendant Bao was arrested by the public security organs; on June 9, 2015, defendants Wei and Huang turned themselves in to the public security organs. Further investigation revealed that on May 28, 2015, Bao's family compensated the victim Luo a total of 15,000 yuan for economic losses, and Bao was forgiven by the victim. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Bao and the others during the trial, and are corroborated by documentary evidence such as the criminal case registration form, the decision to file a case, the arrest report, household registration certificates, extraction records and photos, the list of accepted evidence, the criminal reconciliation document, and receipts; testimonies from witnesses Lu and Li; statements and identification records by the victim Luo, and confessions and identification records, as well as identification photos from defendants Bao, Wei, and Huang, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Bao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 5 a.m. on January 21, 2014, defendant Zhao sold a packet of methamphetamine to Li for 300 yuan in front of the \"Starlight Avenue KTV\" in the county's urban area. At approximately 5 p.m. on the same day, defendant Zhao sold two packets of methamphetamine to defendant Li for 500 yuan in front of the \"Saino\" Hotel in the same urban area. Defendant Li then sold one of these packets to Gao for 400 yuan. The prosecution submitted the following evidence to prove this: 1. Witness testimonies; 2. Expert opinions; 3. Documentary evidence; 4. Defendant confessions, etc.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in early June 2017, the defendant Gao reached an agreement with the defendant Zhao to hand over stolen electric scooters to Zhao for sale. On June 11, 2017, at around 11 PM, the defendant Gao stole a Yadea brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Xu from the parking lot at the entrance of the district Employee Assistance Service Center located at XXX West Ring Road, Nanqiao Town, in the city's district. According to the appraisal, the vehicle involved was valued at RMB 1853. On the evening of June 12, 2017, at around 9 PM, the defendant Gao, together with the co-defendant Zhang (who is being dealt with in a separate case), stole a Xinben Okuda electric scooter belonging to victim Yin from the parking lot north of the RT-Mart supermarket, located at West Ring Road and Nanting Highway, Nanqiao Town, in the city's district. According to the appraisal, the vehicle involved was valued at RMB 1899. The two then proceeded to the intersection of Baiqi Road and Nanfeng Highway in Nanqiao Town and stole a Yadea brand electric scooter belonging to the victim Tao (which could not be appraised). The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Gao and Zhao during the court trial. Furthermore, these facts are supported by the confession of the co-defendant Zhang, statements from the victims Xu, Yin, and Tao, the price determination certificate issued by a certain district development and reform commission in Shanghai, and evidence provided by the public security organs, including the incident and arrest records, seizure transcripts, seizure warrant, seizure list, restitution list, identification transcripts, and photos of the items, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial found that the defendants Wei and Zhang are friends, and the victim Wu is the owner of \"Aodi Kuangchao KTV\" in a certain town. From 22:00 on September 15, 2018, to 00:30 on September 16, defendants Wei, Zhang, and friends including Zhang1 and Liu were singing at \"Aodi Kuangchao KTV\". Dissatisfaction arose in Wei and Zhang due to the service staff repeatedly asking for payment of service fees. Later, Wei had an argument with Wu over the billing issue, during which Wei pushed Wu and got into a fight with him. Zhang and others attempted to intervene, during which Zhang punched and kicked Wu and the intervening individuals. After the parties were separated, Wei picked up bricks and a bench intending to hit Wu, but was struck on the head by Wu with a pickaxe handle, resulting in Wei being injured and hospitalized. Several individuals present during the incident, including Wei, sustained injuries of varying degrees. According to the identification conducted by the Nenjiang Banner Public Security Judicial Identification Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Wei's intracranial injury was assessed as minor injury level 1, and the cranial injury as minor injury level 2. The comprehensive assessment concluded that Wei's injuries were of minor injury level 1. It was also discovered that after the defendants Wei and Zhang were apprehended, they voluntarily and truthfully confessed their crimes. During the examination and prosecution stage, they pleaded guilty and accepted punishment, signed a plea of guilty and agreement, and obtained the victim Wu's understanding. The above facts are backed by a list of accepted evidence materials, one pickaxe handle, records of extraction, photos extracted from the scene, basic information and household registration of the defendants, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, the process of solving the case, evidence collection notifications, evidence collection list, criminal judgment, one medical record of Wei, list of accepted evidence materials, WeChat conversation screenshots, list of accepted evidence materials, compensation agreement and receipt, letter of forgiveness, administrative punishment decision, testimonies of Zhang1, Xi and others, statement of the victim Wu, confessions of defendants Wei and Zhang, the written judgment from the Nenjiang Banner Public Security Judicial Identification Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, inspection record, and electronic surveillance video from \"Aodi Kuangchao\" KTV.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that since May 2013, the defendants Shu and Dai, a couple, through Huang A (handled in another case), operated the \"Mark Six\" gambling in a mahjong parlor located at No. X, X Road, X Town, X City. The defendants Shu and Dai would receive 10% of the total bet amount as a commission. Subsequently, defendants Dai and Shu accepted \"Mark Six\" gambling bets purchased by Li and Wang (already administratively penalized) and others at their place, collecting over 80 periods of gambling bets, accumulating a total of more than 160,000 yuan. On January 28, 2014, defendant Shu voluntarily turned herself in at the public security bureau of X City. On April 28, 2014, defendants Shu and Dai voluntarily returned embezzled funds amounting to 16,000 yuan to this court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Dai and Shu during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to confirm them, including evidence preservation decision documents, seizure decision documents, situation instructions, public security administrative punishment decisions, account books, receipts, testimonies from witnesses Wang, Li, Shi, and Huang, inspection records, identification records and photos, CDs, a voluntary surrender recognition opinion document, invoices, the arrest process, confessions and identification documents of defendants Shu and Dai.", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that at around 3 a.m. on March 14, 2016, the defendants Chen and Liang, after finishing using the internet at an internet cafe in a certain district of a certain city and preparing to leave, noticed that the victim, Zheng, who was using computer number 078 in the internet cafe, was asleep and had placed an iPhone 5S beneath the monitor of computer number 078 to charge. Chen then suggested stealing the phone, and Liang agreed. Liang kept watch while Chen stole the phone. Afterwards, the phone was used by Liang. On March 31, 2016, both defendants were arrested by the police, but the phone could not be recovered. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center of a certain district's Price Bureau, the stolen iPhone 5S belonging to Zheng was valued at 2,200 yuan. During the court hearing, the defendants did not dispute the above facts, and there was corroborating evidence such as the victim's statement, identification records, surveillance video, price appraisal report, and the defendants' confessions and defenses, which are sufficient to establish the facts. The prosecution suggests that the court sentence the defendants Chen and Liang to detention for the crime of x and impose a fine.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged: 1. From mid-August to the end of August 2016, the defendants Zhao and Wang, along with Li (already sentenced) and Zhang (already sentenced), stole silverfish four times from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City. Each time, they stole over 100 jin of silverfish, totaling over 400 jin, with a value of over 4000 RMB; 2. From early September to mid-September 2016, the defendant Wang, together with Li (already sentenced), Zhang (already sentenced), and Hu (already sentenced), stole silverfish more than ten times from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City. Each time, they stole over 200 jin of silverfish, totaling around 2000 jin, with a value of over 20000 RMB; 3. On September 16, 2016, the defendant Wang, together with Li (already sentenced), Zhang (already sentenced), and Hu (already sentenced), stole 304.3 jin of silverfish from a reservoir in Shuangyang District, Changchun City, and were caught by the public security authorities. Upon appraisal, the stolen silverfish were valued at 3104 RMB. In summary, the defendant Zhao participated in theft four times, stealing over 100 jin of silverfish each time, totaling over 400 jin, valued at over 4000 RMB. The defendant Wang participated in theft more than twenty times, stealing over 2700 jin of silverfish in total, valued at over 27000 RMB. After the crime, the defendant Zhao was caught and returned 800 RMB of stolen goods, while Wang turned himself in and returned 3000 RMB of stolen goods. The prosecution has evidence to support the above facts, including the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Wang, witness testimonies, appraisal opinions, identification records, and documentary evidence.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 1 AM on June 9, 2015, Cheng's cousin, Shu, instructed Cheng to go to the Royal KTV on Longgang Road in a certain town of a certain county to ask for a woman's contact information because Shu's girlfriend had a dispute with another KTV hostess there. Cheng, together with Li and Gu (handled in a separate case), went to the KTV. When they failed to get the contact information from the KTV staff, Cheng started smashing the glass inside the KTV with a teacup and a U-lock. Seeing this, Li and Gu joined in and helped destroy the glass and cameras. When the KTV staff tried to stop them, a scuffle ensued. Gu then brandished a knife he had with him to threaten the KTV staff. Cheng, along with the other two, subsequently injured Chen and Lu, who were inside the KTV. Upon receiving a report, police officers rushed to the scene and arrested Cheng and Li on the spot.\n\nAccording to an appraisal by the price department, the destroyed items were valued at RMB 2,684. Forensic evaluations determined that the injuries sustained by victims Chen and Lu were minor. After the incident, Cheng and Li compensated victims Xu, Lu, and Chen with a total of RMB 25,000 for their economic losses, and received their forgiveness. Cheng and Li raised no objections to the stated facts during the trial. Furthermore, the facts are supported by evidence including the knife used as the crime tool, the report materials, screenshots of the surveillance footage, the criminal judgment paper, letters of forgiveness, receipts, explanatory notes, household registration proofs, and testimonies from witnesses Xu, Ming, Zhao, etc., victims Xu, Chen, and Lu’s statements, the price appraisal opinion, the forensic human injury assessment, the on-site inspection records, evidence extraction registration form, site photos, identification transcripts, video surveillance footage, as well as synchronized audio and video of interrogations, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Between April 2019 and February 2020, the defendant Qian established gambling chat groups on the \"Xianliao\" and \"Mowang\" apps to attract gamblers to conduct mahjong gambling activities through the \"Zhoushan Bianfeng Chess\" app. He formulated \"rake-off\" rules and managed, collected rakes, and handled financial settlements within the gambling chat groups, amassing a total of 106,991 RMB in rake-offs. The defendant Chen, entrusted by the defendant Qian, became the administrator of the aforementioned gambling group, assisting Qian in management, rake collection, and financial settlements, totaling 26,907 RMB in rake-offs. On February 28, 2020, the defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his crimes; the defendant Qian also truthfully confessed his crimes upon apprehension. Following the incident, both defendants have returned all illicit gains. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Qian and Chen during the trial, and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Gao, Chai, Yao, Liu, and Zhang; search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure list, restitution list, photos of bank cards and mobile phones, explanatory notes, audio-visual materials, evidence retrieval notices, evidence retrieval lists, electronic evidence inspection work records, assistance in property inquiry notices, account transaction details, audio-visual materials, electronic data production instructions, accompanying transfer lists, confirmation lists of the involved assets' storage, cash deposit vouchers, household registration proof, and the account of how the case was solved. These evidences are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 1:00 a.m. on November 30, 2013, the defendants Wu and Lu stole a Flying Bird brand electric tricycle and a Ben de brand electric bicycle from the first floor of Zheng's house, located at 2-117, Sifen Village, a certain town, a certain city. An appraisal determined that the stolen vehicles were valued at 3,750 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the owner. At around 4:00 a.m. the same day, the defendants Wu and Lu were apprehended by the public security authorities, and after being brought to the station, defendant Wu truthfully confessed to the criminal activities. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Wu and Lu during the trial. Furthermore, the case is supported by evidence, including household registration certificates, criminal judgments, certificates of release after serving sentences, administrative penalty decisions, records of seizure, lists of seized and returned items, identification transcripts and photographs, maintenance vouchers, payment receipts, explanatory notes, the account of how the defendants were brought to justice, statements from the victim Zheng, confessions from defendants Wu and Lu, on-site investigation transcripts, diagrams, on-site photographs, and price appraisal conclusions, all sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: In the early hours of November 12, 2015, Yu Moujia (already sentenced) entered Room 862 of Sou Ge KTV in Hushan Street, Cixi City, due to drunkenness to urinate, and had a dispute with Yang and Wang in the room, which led to him being pulled out. Subsequently, Yu Moujia gathered defendants Hu, Yu, Zhang, and Yu Mouyi (a minor, handled separately) to return to Room 862 and assaulted Yang and Wang using methods such as stabbing with a knife, smashing with beer bottles, and punching and kicking, resulting in injuries to Yang and Wang. According to forensic identification, Yang's external injuries caused a complete fracture of the right 4th metacarpal bone, constituting a level 2 minor injury; external injuries resulted in a scar over 1.0 cm in length on the body, constituting a slight injury; Wang's external injuries resulted in a scar over 1.0 cm in length on a limb, constituting a slight injury. After the incident, defendants Yu and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, truthfully confessed their crimes, and jointly compensated Yang with RMB 16,000 and Wang with RMB 10,000, obtaining the victims' forgiveness. Defendant Hu, after coming to the authorities, truthfully confessed his crimes. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Hu, Yu, and Zhang during the court hearing, and are confirmed by the victim statements of Yang and Wang, the testimony of witness Chen, identification records and photos, surveillance video, forensic medical examination reports on bodily injury, medical records, injury photos, letters of forgiveness, compensation statements, the process of being captured and coming to the authorities, the confessions of co-defendants Yu Moujia and Yu Mouyi, Criminal Judgment No. (2016) Zhe 0282 Xing Chu 178, and the identity documents of defendants Hu, Yu, and Zhang, which are sufficient for recognition. Based on the above criminal facts and circumstances, the public prosecution suggests that the sentencing range for defendant Hu should be eight months to one year and eight months of fixed-term imprisonment; for defendant Yu, six months to one year; and for defendant Zhang, six months to one year.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: I. Crime X 1. At the end of November 2018, defendant Li, knowing that Liu introduced Liu1 and Zhang, who intended to illegally work in a certain country, arranged for others to process tourist visas for Liu1 and Zhang. Li charged each of them a fee of 43,000 yuan and arranged for them to leave the country for a certain country on December 6 of the same year. On December 7 of the same year, defendant Li paid defendant Liu an introduction fee of 8,500 yuan. Liu1 and Zhang stayed in the certain country for an extended period to work illegally. 2. In April 2019, defendant Li, knowing that Zhao intended to illegally work in a certain country, arranged for others to process a non-working visa for Zhao. Li charged Zhao more than 20,000 yuan and arranged for Zhao to leave the country for a certain country on May 9, 2019. Zhao stayed in the certain country for an extended period to work illegally. II. Crime X Defendant Zhu, knowing that defendant Li was being investigated by the public security organs for illegally organizing others to cross the national (border) illegally, hid defendant Li in his residence in a certain city of a certain province on November 29, 2019. On November 21, 2019, defendant Liu was summoned to the case by public security organs from his home. On November 30 of the same year, defendants Li and Zhu were arrested and brought to justice by public security organs in a certain city.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On March 16, 2015, at approximately 2:00 AM, defendants Yuan, Yang, Pan, along with Wang, Shao, and Zhang (whose cases are being handled separately), were drinking at Longxia Restaurant on Geyan Road, Songtai Street in this district. Defendant Yang invited the victim Yu and his girlfriend to drink together. During this period, because Yu refused to let his girlfriend stay and intended to leave first, he was assaulted by the defendants, resulting in second-degree serious injuries. Regarding the alleged facts, the prosecution provided relevant evidence. Accordingly,", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain region charged that on the afternoon of December 23, 2014, defendants Liu and Niu walked to the Jinxiu Qingcheng Community in Linqing City to commit theft. They stole items valued at 2,738.1 yuan from the homes of victims Ji and Chen. Later, when they attempted theft at Xing's home, they were caught and turned over to the public security authorities. After the incident, defendant Liu assisted the public security authorities in apprehending defendant Niu. All stolen items have been returned to the victims.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that from December 15, 2012, to January 6, 2013, the defendants Huang and Zhang, after planning, repeatedly allowed the prostitute Chen (under 18 years old) and Su to engage in prostitution and take commissions at the massage parlor they jointly operated at 132 Shudong Road, Aojiang Town, Pingyang County. On the evening of January 6, 2013, at around 21:00, the defendants Huang and Zhang again allowed Chen to engage in prostitution twice with clients such as Wu and were subsequently apprehended by the public security authorities. The defendants Huang and Zhang did not object to these facts during the trial, and there were witness testimonies from Chen, Su, Wu, Hong, and another Chen, inspection records, identification records, administrative penalty decision documents, inventory of seized items, household registration inquiry records, and apprehension process evidence, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from early June to August 2, 2011, individuals including Jin D, Jin C, Lei, Lin, Huang B, Jin B, Huang A, Zheng, Jin A (all of whom have been sentenced) set up a gambling venue in the mountains near Fengwo Office and Naocun Office in Shuitou Town, Pingyang County. They organized gambling activities in the form of \"Pai Gow\" and illegally collected a rake-off of 150,000 RMB. During this period, the defendants Zhou and Lin served as lookouts at this gambling venue. After the crime was discovered, Zhou and Lin voluntarily surrendered to the police on January 14 and February 28, 2013, respectively. Additionally, it was found that co-defendants Jin D and others have returned the illegal proceeds obtained jointly. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Lin during the trial, and were further substantiated by their previous confessions, statements from co-defendants Huang A, Zheng, Jin A, testimony from witness Zhu, identification records, identification documents, the process of their capture, and the criminal judgments of co-defendants, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Longwan District in a certain city has charged: Starting from July and August 2015, defendants Feng and Yu, after premeditation, accepted wagers from others in the form of \"Mark Six\" gambling at the residence rented by Feng at No. 43 Puzhou Street, Puzhou Subdistrict, Longwan District, a certain city. Upon investigation, it was found that defendants Yu and Feng accepted wagers for at least 10 periods of Mark Six, with the total wager amounting to more than 24,822 yuan. The prosecution has submitted corresponding evidence for the above allegations.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on the evening of May 18, 2016, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge, after prior consultation, illegally used electricity to fish in the Meilin River area of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district during the fishing ban period. They were caught on the spot by police officers from the public security bureau of a certain district of a certain city. The police confiscated a total of 74 fish from defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge. Further investigation revealed that upon discovery of the case by the public security agency, one electric bamboo pole, one water bucket, one inverter, one battery, and one electric probe (including 5 meters of electric wire) owned by defendant Liu were seized. These items are currently stored at the Anchang Police Station of the public security bureau of a certain district in a certain city. After the arrest, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge truthfully confessed to the above facts. During the court hearing, defendants Liu, Ou, Geng, and Ge did not object to the above facts, which are corroborated by photos of the crime tools, the seizure list from the public security bureau of a certain district, a satellite positioning map, the notification from the People's Government of Zhejiang Province regarding the issuance of rights and certificates for the designated areas, a certificate from the Fisheries Administration Station of a certain district, a notification from the Agriculture and Forestry Bureau of a certain district regarding the implementation of the 2016 fishing ban, an approval from the Zhejiang Provincial Ocean and Fisheries Bureau on the implementation of the fishing ban by a certain city, the announcement of the 2016 fishing ban from Shaoxing Daily, and records and photographs from the arrest process provided by police officers from the public security bureau of a certain district. All these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Fine"], "Ou": ["Fine"], "Geng": ["Fine"], "Ge": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged that from approximately 9 a.m. on October 13, 2013, to around 4 p.m. the following day, the defendants Zhao and Yang, together with Hu B (handled in a separate case) and others, detained Hu Yi in order to demand repayment of a loan Hu Yi owed to the defendant Yang. They took Hu Yi from the Wankexin Hotel on East Station Road, Daxue Town, in the county to a certain village and the mountains of Baizhangji Town, where they detained and assaulted Hu Yi to coerce repayment of the debt. On October 21, 2013, the defendants Zhao and Yang reported to the public security authorities claiming that Yang had been defrauded by Hu Yi. However, they were criminally summoned to the case by the authorities. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were substantiated in court by the prosecution through evidence including the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Yang; statements from the victim, Hu Yi; witness testimonies from individuals such as Hu A, Lin, and others; identification records, on-site inspection records, and photographs; a forensic medical assessment of bodily injury; proof of household registration, call records, verification of criminal history, situation explanations, and other evidence.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that from April 2013 to November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen conspired to go to certain mountains near Villages in a certain county, using bird call recordings to capture 23 thrush birds with nets. Among them, on November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen captured 14 thrush birds with nets on a mountain near a village in a certain county, after which they were discovered by the public security authorities. The public security authorities seized bird-catching nets and other items. After identification, the captured thrush birds are considered terrestrial wildlife under national protection, deemed beneficial or having significant economic and scientific research value. On November 18, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wen were summoned to the case by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wen during the trial, and are confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Tu, identification records, photographs, documents from the Zhejiang Provincial Forestry Department, documents from the Forestry Specialty Bureau of a certain county, seizure order, identification report, case documentation, and population information forms, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention"], "Wen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in the early hours of June 30, 2014, the defendant Guan, due to a debt dispute with Zhang, gathered the defendant Cai to help him collect the debt from Zhang. Later, the defendant Cai gathered the defendant Shen and other individuals, including Yang (handled in a separate case), to forcibly take Zhang from Room 301 of the Meixin Hotel in a certain district of a certain city to Room 809 of the Jinhao Hotel in Jinqing Town of the same district, where Zhang was unlawfully detained for approximately 30 hours. On July 1, 2014, the defendants Cai and Shen were apprehended on the spot by the public security organs in Room 809 of the Jinhao Hotel. On July 7, 2014, the defendant Guan turned himself in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cai, Guan, and Shen during the court hearing and were substantiated by the following evidence admitted through court examination: 1) the victim Zhang's statement; 2) the testimony of witness Ke; 3) the confession of accomplice Yang; 4) the identification record; 5) the list of collected evidence; 6) surveillance video disc; 7) situation report; 8) account of the arrest; 9) account of apprehension; 10) household registration certificates. These pieces of evidence are authentic, legal, and sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cai": ["Imprisonment"], "Guan": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that since July 2014, the defendants, Deng and Xiao, a married couple, allowed two men to place video game machines and \"slot machines\" with signs reading \"Parent-Child Paradise\" at the entrance of their \"Supermarket\" located in a village of a town in a certain city, approximately 40 meters from a primary school. These devices were used by others for gambling activities. Deng and Xiao agreed with the two men to split the profits evenly, and during this period, they made an illegal profit totaling over 700 yuan. On August 22 of the same year, Wang and Zhang (both minors under the age of fourteen) along with Wu engaged in gambling using the video game machines at the supermarket. They were later caught by the public security bureau staff from a certain city, who seized four video game machines used for gambling and 372 one-yuan coins on the spot. The aforementioned facts, which the defendants Deng and Xiao did not dispute during the trial, are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhang, and Wu, as well as demographic information of Wang and Zhang, photographs of the scene, records of examination, counting records, lists of evidence preservation, lists of confiscated items and photographs, indicative photographs of the scene, the appraisal report on the video game equipment, administrative penalty decision, cancellation of administrative penalty decision, the progress of the case, and the defendants Deng and Xiao’s confession and identification evidence. This is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. Around June 10, 2014, defendant Gu, contacted by defendant Zhang, sold approximately 0.5 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Shi for 200 RMB at a hotel in Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. 2. On the afternoon of June 18, 2014, defendant Zhang bought methamphetamine from defendant Gu and sold approximately 0.5 grams of methamphetamine to drug user Shi for 200 RMB on a bridge in a village on Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. 3. On the evening of June 20, 2014, defendant Zhang purchased 0.58 grams of methamphetamine from defendant Gu for 300 RMB, and later sold it to drug user Shi for 400 RMB at the entrance of a hotel on Yuhang Street, a certain district in a certain city. The evidence for the charges includes household registration certificates and other documentary evidence; witness testimonies; drug test reports and certificates; search records and identification records; 1 CD; and the statements and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on November 28, 2012, at approximately 10:00 am, defendant Lin, in collusion with defendant Wu, took advantage of their positions at work. While unobserved, they stole a roll of cowhide leather valued at 4,000 RMB from the production workshop of \"Qingdao XXXX Leather Products Co., Ltd.\" On December 20, 2012, at approximately 9:00 am, defendant Lin similarly took advantage of their position at work and stole another roll of cowhide leather valued at 4,000 RMB from the same company's production workshop while unobserved. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The two defendants were apprehended and brought to justice on December 21, 2012. During the trial proceedings, defendant Lin returned the stolen money amounting to 4,000 RMB, which has been reimbursed to the victimized unit.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on February 2, 2013, at around 10:00 am, representatives of Hexiangsheng Catering Company, Jia, Zhao, Yang, and Sui, had an argument with representatives of Longfeng Xintiandi Shopping Mall, Chen, Xiao, Bian, and Zhang A, in the fifth-floor conference room of Longfeng Xintiandi Shopping Mall in Hailar District due to a contract dispute. Later, when Chen attempted to leave, Jia approached Chen and grabbed his collar to prevent him from leaving. The defendants, Wang, Du, and Ma (deceased), entered the conference room upon hearing the commotion. The three of them grabbed and kicked Jia, causing injuries to Jia's face. According to an assessment, the injuries to victim Jia's nose and left eye socket were classified as minor injuries. It was also found that the defendants Wang and Du were brought to justice by the public security authorities on June 28, 2019. After the incident, victim Jia forgave defendants Wang and Du. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Wang and Du during the trial and are corroborated by the case registration form, police handling registration form, victim Jia's statement, testimonies of witnesses Yang, Sui, Xiao, Zhang 1, Bian, Chen, Bao, Li, Lü, Zhang 2, confession of co-defendant Ma, identification records, forensic identification report, Du's medical diagnosis certificate, Ma's death certificate, criminal judgment, written forgiveness, video disc of forgiveness content, explanation of the case, household registration certificate, and the confession and interrogation video discs of defendants Wang and Du, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Du": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that since June 2015, the defendants Lai and two other men (handled in separate cases) without the permission of the registered trademark owners, filled the raw materials for shampoo into empty bottles labeled with trademarks such as \"Head & Shoulders,\" \"Sassoon,\" \"Pantene,\" and \"Rejoice\" on the first floor of a rental house at No. 1071, Hengjiang Village, Dali Town, Nanhai District, a city rented by Lai. Defendant Lai would then drive and deliver the counterfeit finished products to customers. In July and August 2015, the defendant Yi came to the aforementioned counterfeit product manufacturing site and collaborated with defendant Lai to produce shampoos labeled with trademarks such as \"Head & Shoulders,\" \"Sassoon,\" \"Pantene,\" and \"Rejoice\" in the aforementioned manner. On January 20, 2016, police officers seized 4,392 bottles of counterfeit shampoos, along with a batch of raw materials and tools used for the filling process at the location mentioned above and apprehended defendants Lai and Yi on the spot. According to the appraisal, the seized counterfeit registered trademark shampoo was valued at a total of RMB 113,801. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence to the court: business licenses, trademark registration certificates, identification reports and proofs; testimonies from witnesses Chen, Lai; confessions, defenses, and identification records of defendants Lai and Yi; records by the public security authorities on the capture of the defendants; on-site investigation records; search records; a list of seized items; property valuation report involved in the case; and the defendants' household registration documents. All of the above evidence was cross-examined in court.", "label": {"Lai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place alleges: At around 22:00 on October 7, 2015, defendants Ma and Yang, after prior contact, together went to Room XXX at the “XXX Hotel,” located at XXX Lane, XXX Road, Huaxin Town, Qingpu District, this city. They sold 3.90 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Liu and Wang at the price of 1,700 yuan, and were caught red-handed by police officers. After being brought in, defendants Ma and Yang both truthfully confessed the above-mentioned facts. The public prosecution agency believes that the actions of defendants Ma and Yang violated Article X, Clause 4, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and the two defendants should be held criminally responsible for the joint crime of X. After being brought in, defendants Ma and Yang both truthfully confessed their crimes and, according to Article X of the Criminal Law, can be given a lighter punishment. It is recommended that both defendants be sentenced to one to two years of fixed-term imprisonment and be fined. The court is requested to try the case according to the law. Defendant Ma and his defense counsel have no objections to the facts and legal characterization alleged by the public prosecution agency; the defense counsel believes that defendant Ma is a first-time offender, has truthfully confessed his crimes after being brought in, and the drugs sold did not enter society, suggesting a lighter punishment for him. Defendant Yang and his defense counsel have no objections to the facts and characterization alleged by the public prosecution agency; the defense counsel believes that defendant Yang is a first-time and accessory offender, has truthfully confessed his crimes after being brought in, and the drugs sold did not enter society, suggesting a lighter punishment for him. After trial, the facts ascertained by this court are consistent with the facts alleged by the public prosecution agency, as evidenced by the following: testimonies and identification records of witnesses Liu and Wang, seizure records, inventory of seized items, photos of confiscated evidence, mobile phone screenshots, Shanghai Drug Testing Center inspection report, case registration form, working status, and confessions of defendants Ma and Yang. This evidence has been verified in court and confirmed by this court.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: 1. At approximately 0:30 on February 27, 2016, the defendants Kong and Zhou, after drinking, without reason, assaulted victims Xu and Li1 in the Hengsheng Internet Cafe on Longyue Road, a town in Cangnan County, causing injuries to Xu and Li1. According to forensic identification, the injuries suffered by victims Xu and Li1 were classified as minor. After the incident, Zhou reached a civil settlement with victims Xu and Li1. 2. At around 4:00 on the same day, defendant Kong, along with Fang, again assaulted victim Li2 without reason inside the Hengsheng Internet Cafe using beer bottles and brooms. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants during the court trial and are substantiated by the statements of victims Xu and Li1, testimonies of witnesses Dai and Wu, examination records, identification records, forensic medical evaluation reports on human injuries, settlement agreements, letters of understanding, receipts, administrative penalty decisions, criminal judgments, explanatory notes, the process of bringing the case to light, surveillance video footage, and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Kong": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: 1. On August 10, 2020, defendants Zhang and Shi, driving a Toyota car with Beijing license plates, went to the warehouse of the Industrial Park Project Department in Jingping Town, Pinglu District, and stole 65 boxes of high-strength bolts, one medium and large air impact wrench each, 8 lifting chains, 2 welding machines, 5 17-ton jacks, 2 50-ton hydraulic jacks, 3 square meters of 14mm steel plates, 3 kg wrenches, 30 box wrenches (valued at 29,089 RMB according to the Pinglu District Price Assessment Center), 20 bags of screws, 8 sets of trestle bridge supports, 50 ladder steps, 80 meters of 16-square cable, 100 meters of 6-square cable, and 120 meters of 38-square cable. 2. On the afternoon of January 22, 2020, defendants Zhang and Shi went to the Ankoutou Bridge parking lot in Mahuangtou Village, Jingping Town, and stole 18 wheel hubs, valued at more than 3,600 RMB.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 2 PM on February 27, 2014, defendants Tian and Shen harbored individuals using drugs, namely Xu and Chao (born on September 13, 1998), in Room 406 of Zhongli Hotel, located at No. 2, Jian She Road, Jiekou Street, in a certain city. They were later apprehended on the scene by police officers. Seized at the scene were a clear plastic bottle used as a drug paraphernalia, a plastic straw, a transparent glass container, one package of yellow crystals (net weight 0.20 grams, containing methamphetamine), one package of white crystals (net weight 0.07 grams, containing methamphetamine), and another package of white crystals (net weight 1.10 grams, containing methamphetamine).\n\nThe aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tian and Shen during the court hearing. The evidence includes testimonies from drug users Chao and Xu, a recognition record and photographs of defendants Tian and Shen identified by drug user Chao, mutual recognition records and photographs of defendants Tian and Shen, photographs of the crime scene, drug paraphernalia, and drugs identified by defendant Tian, photographs of the crime scene identified by defendant Shen, on-scene investigation records, a schematic diagram and on-scene photographs, inspection records, evidence preservation lists, a drug handover list, on-site testing report, laboratory test report, administrative penalty decision, household registration materials of drug user Chao, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration materials of the defendants, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.\n\nThe defense attorney, Wang, argued as follows: There was no objection to the charge of crime x against defendant Tian by the prosecution. However, there was opposition to the charge of Tian allegedly harboring a minor for drug usage, as it was argued that defendant Tian did not previously know Chao, nor was aware of Chao’s age, thus lacking any subjective awareness of whether Chao was a minor. Furthermore, it was contended that the defendant was a first-time offender, capable of truthfully confessing his crimes, and posed a relatively light social danger, and hence, it was suggested to the court to impose a lighter penalty on defendant Tian.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authorities charge that, around 2 a.m. on August 17, 2015, the defendants Li and Liu conspired and drove a women's motorcycle to the vicinity of No. 17 Haoyuan Road, Shawan Town, in this district. Defendant Liu was responsible for driving the vehicle and acting as a lookout, while Defendant Li used lock-picking tools to steal a men's motorcycle of the Lukang brand (valued at 3,753 RMB), which belonged to the victim, Lan, and was parked inside the yard. They were caught on the spot by the community and security personnel. Subsequently, the police seized one glove, a flathead socket, and an L-shaped hex head at the scene, and from Defendant Liu's location, they seized a women's motorcycle, two screwdrivers, and a hex key. These facts were also confessed to by Defendants Li and Liu during the trial, corroborated by the victim Lan's report statement, witness testimonies from He Yi, He Bing, and Wang Yi, defendants’ confessions, identification records, the appraisal report on the property involved issued by the Panyu District Branch of the Guangzhou Public Security Bureau, on-site inspection records, site diagrams, site photos, search records, seizure lists, arrest process, and case-solving process, sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting from March 27, 2014, the defendants Yao and Liu, a married couple, knowingly used hydrogen peroxide to process food despite being aware that it is not permissible to do so. In order to improve the quality, appearance, and flavor of the food, defendant Yao soaked chicken feet intended for sale in a hydrogen peroxide solution for an extended period, while defendant Liu assisted Yao by adding hydrogen peroxide and selling the chicken feet that had been soaked in it. According to the assessment by Yueqing City Food Quality and Safety Testing Center, the confiscated hydrogen peroxide was found to contain 268.96 mg/ml of hydrogen peroxide, and the chicken feet contained 3.62 mg/kg of hydrogen peroxide. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by the defendants Yao and Liu during the court hearing and were substantiated by evidence such as the sampling inspection slip, the list of confiscated items, national standards for the use of food additives, testimonies, details of the arrest, the inspection report from Yueqing City Food Quality and Safety Testing Center, search records, on-site records, proof of prior convictions, and proof of residence, among others, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accused that on September 15, 2015, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Yang and He were driving a red Zhonghua brand sedan with the license plate K××××× from a certain area, illegally transporting smuggled cigarettes. They were intercepted by police officers at the Shatian Town Toll Station on the Lanhai Expressway in Hepu County, Guangxi. Six types of smuggled cigarettes—Zhonghua (hard), Soft Treasures Cloud Cigarettes, Soft Ru Yi Cloud Cigarettes, Hard Yuxi, Flat Box Yuxi, Purple Cloud Cigarettes—totaling 940 cartons were seized from the car. According to the inspection by the Guangxi Tobacco Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, the confiscated cigarettes were all genuine, with a total value of 159,878 yuan, and none of these cigarettes had legal transportation permits or any other legal documentation. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the criminal acts charged.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 10 PM on November 29, 2017, at a karaoke venue in a certain town, defendants Wang and Li mistakenly believed that Zhang had insulted their friend Wang. Subsequently, Wang and Li assaulted Zhang, causing injuries to Zhang's nose, eyes, and head. On December 29, 2017, the Ewenki Autonomous Banner Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center identified the victim Zhang’s bilateral nasal bone fractures as minor injuries level two. It was further ascertained that on December 11, 2017, defendant Li voluntarily surrendered. On June 28, 2018, defendant Wang was apprehended at a certain station. After the incident, defendants Wang and Li compensated the victim Zhang, obtaining Zhang's forgiveness.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 3 PM on November 8, 2015, the victim, Wei Mou Bing, parked the van he was driving (license plate: Gui M×××××) at the traffic circle of Laren Street, Laren Town, a county in Du'an. A conflict arose over parking issues with the defendants, Tan and Pan. After an argument among the three, defendant Pan grabbed a car lock from Wei Mou Bing's van and smashed the van, while defendant Tan dragged Wei Mou Bing out of the van. In broad daylight, defendants Tan and Pan assaulted Wei Mou Bing, causing him to be injured and requiring hospitalization. A forensic examination by the Du'an County Public Security Bureau determined that Wei Mou Bing's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. Further investigation revealed that defendants Pan and Tan voluntarily surrendered to the Laren Police Station of the Du'an County Public Security Bureau on November 10 and November 11, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed their crimes. During Wei Mou Bing's hospitalization, the two defendants gave 2,500 yuan to Zuo Mou to pass on to Wei Mou Bing, with 2,000 yuan for medical expenses and 500 yuan for living expenses during the hospital stay. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Pan during the trial. Supporting evidence includes documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, household registration certificates, statements of appearance in the case, the victim Wei Mou Bing's admission and hospitalization records; testimonies from witnesses Wei Mou Yi, Lan Mou, Zuo Mou, and Li Mou; the victim Wei Mou Bing’s statements; and the defendants Tan and Pan's confessions and defenses; expert assessments; investigation and inspection records; audiovisual materials, among others. All the above evidence was presented and cross-examined during the trial, the sources of the evidence are legitimate, the content they reflect is objective and true, and is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 11 a.m. on November 4, 2016, defendants Zhang and Huang, a married couple, were at the \"Like\" clothing store at 190 Middle Street, Ancient Lake Town, in a certain county. Defendant Huang was responsible for keeping watch, while defendant Zhang stole a white \"BBK vivox6plus\" phone worth 2305 yuan from atop the cashier's counter, belonging to victim Huang2. At around 6 p.m. on November 8, 2016, defendants Zhang and Huang were at the \"Impression Theme\" clothing store at 45 Shunhe Street, Ancient Lake Town, in the same county. Again, defendant Huang kept watch while defendant Zhang stole a rose gold \"iPhone 6S\" phone worth 3116 yuan from atop the cashier's counter, belonging to victim Ma. On January 17, 2017, defendant Zhang was apprehended by police officers. The next day, defendant Huang voluntarily surrendered to the police. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. During the trial, neither defendant disputed these facts, which were corroborated sufficiently by materials including: written documents such as the defendants’ household registration certificates, records of arrest and surrender provided by the county police department, proof from the county special education school, receipt for the purchase of phones, criminal judgments from the county people's court, criminal judgment from Chengdu Jin Niu District People's Court, release certificates, testimony from witness Liu, statements from victims Ma and Huang2, confessions and identification records from defendants Zhang and Huang, an evaluation opinion from the county price certification center regarding the value of the stolen phones, on-site inspection records, and surveillance screenshots.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that on November 16, 2012, the defendants Chen and Zhang, together with Wang (handled in a separate case) and others, went to Room X on the second floor of No. XX, Xiaotang Street, Zhengyi Town, a certain city, unlocked the door using technical means, and entered the premises to steal. They took one desktop assembled computer belonging to the victim Li (worth 1,500 RMB) and more than 70 RMB in cash. After Chen was apprehended, he confessed to the crime truthfully. On the afternoon of January 25, 2013, Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the Zhengyi Police Station in a certain city and truthfully confessed to the crime. It was further found that Chen and Zhang compensated the victim Li with 1,200 RMB and 800 RMB respectively, and both obtained the victim Li's forgiveness. During the court trial, Chen and Zhang raised no objections to the above facts. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victim Li, the confession of the accomplice Wang, testimonies from witnesses Qiao, Bu, Zhou, Zhao, Zhang, and Wang Jia, site inspection records, lists of collected evidence, restitution receipts, computer configuration lists, receipts, letters of forgiveness, the criminal judgment, price verification conclusions, permanent resident information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that Wang was the ex-girlfriend of the defendant Zhang. In 2016, Wang borrowed 50,000 yuan from Suqian Branch of Shanghai Finance Company and agreed on the interest rate. Since Wang did not repay the principal and interest on time, employees of the company, including Guan and Zhu, went to a location on May 9, 2017, to seek repayment from Wang. After learning about this, the defendant Zhang contacted Guan, Zhu, and others by phone and arranged to meet Guan and others near a neighborhood in a certain town in a certain county, under the pretense of discussing repayment. At around 16:00 that day, after Guan and others arrived at the designated location, the defendants Zhang and Hu started punching and kicking Guan and Zhu. The defendant Zhang then used tools such as bamboo sticks and iron forks to beat Guan, resulting in lacerations of the soft tissue on Guan's face, fractures of the bilateral nasal bones, bilateral maxillary fractures, nasal septum fracture, and a comminuted fracture of the left ulna. According to forensic identification, the degree of bodily injury to the victim, Guan, was classified as minor injury of the first degree. It was also found that the defendants Zhang and Hu truthfully confessed their criminal acts and those of their accomplices after being apprehended. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Hu during the trial. The evidence includes statements from the victims Guan and Zhu, testimonies from witnesses who did not appear in court, such as Song, physical evidence photos, medical records, and injury photos, forensic identification of bodily injury degree, identification transcripts, surveillance videos, criminal judgment documents, proof of release upon completion of sentence, the case investigation process, explanation of the circumstances of apprehension, household registration information, among others, and is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At approximately 2 a.m. on September 15, 2014, defendants Xiang and Ye, after consuming services at Shanghai Beach KTV located at XXX Tifeng Road in this district, inexplicably vandalized the breakfast cart and lock repair stall belonging to victim Cheng in the KTV parking lot. Subsequently, they returned to the KTV and kicked damaging a Kawasaki motorcycle, two bronze statues in the hall, and a floodlight at the entrance. According to the appraisal, the damage was valued at 8,070 RMB. On September 15, 2014, defendants Xiang and Ye were arrested, and upon arrival they truthfully confessed to the criminal acts. After the incident, defendants Xiang and Ye respectively compensated the injured unit and the victim Cheng for economic losses totaling 40,000 RMB and 1,000 RMB, and obtained understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Xiang and Ye during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statement of victim Cheng, the testimonies of witnesses Huang, Wang, and Hu, as well as the recognition record by Huang, the \"Evidence Retrieval Notice,\" \"List of Retrieved Evidence,\" \"Inventory List,\" and photographs issued by Baoshan Branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, the \"Price Appraisal Conclusion of Property and Goods\" issued by Baoshan District Price Certification Center, the \"Letter of Understanding\" issued by Shanghai Dingmei Entertainment Co., Ltd., and \"Work Report\" issued by Baoshan Branch of the Shanghai Public Security Bureau, all of which provided adequate proof for the conviction.", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution has accused that on October 30, 2013, at around 20:00, the defendant Zheng and the victim Liu Moule had an altercation over billiard scoring issues at the billiard club on the fourth floor of Xiangying Hotel in Nanzhuang Town, Chancheng District, Foshan City. Subsequently, the defendant Zheng, along with defendant Tu and Wang Moulin, \"Qiang Moumou\" (each handled in separate cases), assaulted the victims Liu Moule, Liu Moubiao, and Luo Mouquan in the billiard room with billiard cues and other tools. During the incident, the defendant Zheng injured the victim Liu Moule's left thigh with a spring knife. According to forensic identification, the injuries of victims Liu Moule and Liu Moubiao were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the family of the defendant Tu apologized to the three victims and obtained their forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zheng and Tu during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the statements and identification records of victims Liu Moule, Liu Moubiao, and Luo Mouquan, the testimony and identification records of witness Hu Mouhui, the testimony of witness Le Mouju, the on-site investigation records, the forensic report on human injury assessment, reconciliation agreement, letter of forgiveness, arrest process, household registration materials, and the confessions and identification records of defendants Zheng and Tu during the investigation phase, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: Defendants Yu and Liu conspired together and, on March 24, 2016, at around 10 AM, followed Ma into an elevator on the third floor of the outpatient building of the Guangzhou Military Region Wuhan General Hospital in Wuchang District of this city. Taking advantage of the crowded situation in the elevator, defendant Liu was responsible for covering and obstructing Ma's vision, while defendant Yu proceeded to commit theft, stealing an Apple 6S Plus smartphone (valued at 5,300 RMB) from Ma's jacket pocket. To support the above facts alleged by the public prosecution, evidence is provided including the capture and case-solving process issued by the public security organs, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim’s report and statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, and the price appraisal report.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between July and August 2013, defendant Liu, in collusion with defendant Fu, took advantage of the nighttime when no one was around. Liu entered warehouses No. 15 and 16 at the Wangjiangjing Shipping Station in Xiuzhou District of a certain city by climbing through windows. They repeatedly stole 14 rolls of jacquard fabric (with an average length of 190 meters per roll) and 31 rolls of 300T Spring Ya Spun fabric (with an average length of 250 meters per roll), all belonging to a city's Jiaruisi Weaving Co., Ltd. Fu then moved the stolen fabric to his Wuling van with license plate number Zhe F××××× and transported them to a town in a certain province for resale. The total value of the stolen goods was approximately 32,340 RMB. After the incident, defendant Fu returned the sum of 32,340 RMB, which was given back to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Fu during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence, including photos of the tools used in the crime, the seizure order and list, the criminal judgment, release proof, fabric delivery notes, testimonies of witnesses Chen and Shen, examination records, identification records and photos, the price appraisal conclusion, the capture process, and explanatory notes. This evidence is sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On the evening of September 5, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to Unit 4, the stairway entrance on the first floor of a building beside Fushi Jinma Apartment, Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole a Yifan brand electric bicycle belonging to Li, which was parked there (the whole vehicle could not be appraised for value). The battery of that vehicle was valued at 551 yuan. 2. On the evening of around September 10, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to the vicinity of the demolition site of the Bailing Printing Factory behind Rural Cooperative Bank, Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole four batteries from a parked electric tricycle belonging to Zhu, with a total value of 876 yuan. 3. On the evening of September 23, 2014, defendants Tong and Luo colluded and went to the swimming pool area of the Goldman Plaza at the Cultural and Sports Center in Tangtouqiao Town, a district in a certain city, and stole a Lanyu brand electric bicycle belonging to Wang, valued at 2280 yuan, which was equipped with a locator valued at 218 yuan. After the incident, the electric bicycle and locator were recovered and returned to the victim Wang. After being brought to justice, defendants Tong and Luo both truthfully confessed to the above thefts committed in collusion. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Tong and Luo during the court trial, and were substantiated by the statements of the victims Li, Zhu, and Wang, the testimony of a witness named Pan, the description of the incident, explanatory notes, seizure records, identification records, seizure lists, return lists, lists of received evidence materials, receipts of payment, price identification conclusion papers, residence registration proofs, public security administrative punishment decisions, and labor re-education decisions, among other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on the evening of March 24, 2017, defendants Zhang and Zhu went to the front of Golden Age KTV on Changjiang West Road in Huaiyin District, Huai'an City, where they discovered that the key had not been removed from a red Zhendipai scooter owned by Su, parked in front of the KTV. The two defendants then stole the vehicle. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,726 RMB. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Zhu were apprehended by the public security authorities on April 5, 2017. After being brought to justice, they both truthfully confessed the criminal facts. Furthermore, the stolen electric scooter has been recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Zhang and Zhu during the court hearing. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by the statement of the victim Su, the testimony of absent witness Li, photographs of the stolen electric scooter, surveillance video from the scene, video investigation analysis report, price appraisal conclusion document, list of seized and returned items, and the report on the case resolution, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Fine"], "Zhu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Port District of a certain city accuses: Defendants Sun and Ji were electricians for the third phase of the Sunshine Coast Community Project in the Port District of a certain city. At approximately 14:00 on January 5, 2015, defendant Ji was working in the underground parking lot of Unit 8, Phase 3 of the community when he noticed a batch of lighting wires in the fan room. Defendant Ji suggested stealing the wires, and defendant Sun agreed. Subsequently, the two moved 28 coils of Huayi brand cables (26 coils of single-core solid conductor without sheath, specification: ZR-BV, and 2 coils of ordinary PVC sheathed cables, specification: 602271ec53) onto defendant Sun's minivan with the license plate 桂P××××× and drove them away. Defendant Sun stored the cables at his father-in-law's house, located at No. 3, Team 16, Nasuo Farm, Huashi Town, a certain district, intending to find a buyer. After the incident, the cables were recovered. The price center of a certain city appraised the stolen cables at a value of RMB 15,600. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Sun and Ji during court hearings and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Luo and Huang, the case registration form, the filing decision, photos of the stolen cables, the list of seized items, the price appraisal report, the site inspection record, the search record, the identification record, and the household registration and confessions of defendants Sun and Ji, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. The defense counsel for defendant Sun argues that defendant Sun is an accidental offender and a first-time offender, actively cooperated with the public security organs to recover the stolen goods, and has obtained the victim's understanding, requesting the court for lenient punishment. The defense counsel for defendant Ji has no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution, believes that defendant Ji has a good attitude towards admitting guilt and is a first-time offender, and requests lenient punishment.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that in February 2019, Fan, a resident of Kelan County, had her daughter criminally detained by the Direct Branch of the Xinzhou Public Security Bureau. To secure her daughter's early release, Fan was introduced by Ma to the defendant Gao. Gao claimed to be able to handle the matter and charged Fan 11,000 yuan. Gao then introduced Fan to Huang to handle the matter. Defendant Huang demanded 30,000 yuan from Fan. Subsequently, Gao lost contact, and Huang refunded Fan 11,000 yuan before the case was filed, then also lost contact. After the case was filed, Huang and his family voluntarily returned a total of 32,500 yuan to Fan and obtained her forgiveness; Gao's family voluntarily returned 11,000 yuan to Fan and obtained forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Gao during the trial, and were corroborated by victim Fan's statement, testimonies of witnesses Ma, another Fan, Zhao, case records, recognition transcripts, WeChat chats, transfer screenshots, bank transaction details, receipts, and letters of forgiveness, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant, Li, ran a small shop opposite No. 210, Xiayanglin Village, Hengfeng Street, Wenling City. Starting from late November 2013, the defendant Li set up a casino in the shop using a \"two-card\" format, attracting individuals such as Chen, Zhang, and Que to participate in gambling. Defendants Jin, Pan, and Lin subsequently assisted in the shop, with profits being taken from the gambling dealers. By January 8, 2014, when the police discovered the operation, the total profit extracted was 25,000 RMB. Among these profits, defendant Lin personally earned 11,500 RMB, defendant Pan earned 2,000 RMB, and defendant Li earned 1,000 RMB. On the evening of January 8, the police from the Hengfeng Police Station of Wenling Public Security Bureau apprehended defendants Li, Lin, Pan, and Jin at the gambling site, seizing 700 RMB in gambling profits and a monitoring device on the spot. After being brought to justice, the four defendants truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. During the trial, none of the defendants raised any objections to these facts, which were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Chen, Zhang, Que, and others, inspection records, situation explanations, household registration proof of the defendants, and evidence of apprehension, sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, the following facts were ascertained: \n\n1. On May 26, 2019, defendant Ji went to the Gaoshuma Store located at 3-D225 in Yinhewan Digital City, Tianning District, a certain city, and falsely claimed to mortgage his mobile phone for a loan, promising to repay it the same day. Ji deceived victim Zhang Yi out of 5,800 RMB and used the money for online gambling. After the incident, Ji's family repaid 5,800 RMB to the victim.\n\n2. On June 12, 2019, victim Wang contacted defendant Ji for cashing out a credit card. Defendants Ji, Zhang, and Zhou conspired to defraud the cash-out amount. At around 16:00 on the same day, defendant Zhou arranged for the victim to meet near the parking lot of a certain city's Wujin District, Hutang Town, Tesco, where he used a POS provided by Zhang to cash out 6,000 RMB from victim Wang and charged a cash-out fee of 72 RMB. They then falsely claimed the funds would be transferred the next day, using a fake identity to issue a promissory note and deceive the victim into leaving the scene. Ji used the money for repayment or personal expenditure. After the incident, Ji repaid 6,072 RMB to the victim.\n\nFurthermore, it was found that on May 26, 2019, defendant Ji fraudulently obtained 5,800 RMB from Zhang Jia, the owner of Qiqile Digital Store located at B108 in Yinhewan Digital City, Tianning District, a certain city, under the guise of mortgaging his mobile phone for a loan. Ji's family later assisted with the repayment.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Ji, Zhang, and Zhou during the trial. These facts are corroborated by evidence including the accounts and case-solving records, arrest procedures, identification transcripts and photographs, extraction transcripts, search transcripts, seizure transcripts and lists, return lists, Alipay transfer records, bank card transaction details, receipts, the testimony of witness Zhang Jia, and statements made by victims Wang and Zhang Yi. These are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ji": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Fine"], "Zhou": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on January 20, 2016, defendants Shen, Gao, Feng, and Gu went to the women's clothing store Liang Yifang, the Ayoub children's clothing store, and the Dadao shoe store in Tongxing Alley, a certain town in a certain county, and respectively stole cash from victims Ren, Chen, and Bao, with a total value of RMB 5,800.", "label": {"Shen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that: 1. On March 30, 2016, at around 5:00 PM, the defendant Luo, together with Liao (at large), conspired to commit theft. They rode a motor-assisted two-wheel motorcycle to the entrance of the Carrefour supermarket located at * South Street, Chengxiang Town, a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of a moment when no one was around, they stole an orange two-wheel electric bicycle, brand \"Rose Date,\" parked there by Huang. Later, they sold the stolen goods to \"Qin's Repair Shop\" at the Sunshine Market on North Road of a certain district government, obtaining 600 RMB, which they split and spent. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised to be worth 1300 RMB. 2. On April 6, 2016, at around 5:00 PM, the defendant Luo, together with Wen, conspired to commit theft. They rode a motor-assisted two-wheel motorcycle to the entrance of the Carrefour supermarket at 119 South Street, Chengxiang Town, a certain district in a certain city. Taking advantage of a moment when no one was around, they stole a red two-wheel electric bicycle, brand \"Rose Date,\" parked there by Shen. They later sold the stolen goods to \"Qin's Repair Shop\" at the Sunshine Market on North Road of a certain district government, obtaining 800 RMB, which they split and spent. The stolen electric bicycle was appraised to be worth 1920 RMB. On April 6, 2016, the police apprehended Luo and Wen, bringing them to justice. To support the facts of the charges, the prosecution submitted evidence including the case acceptance register, the victim's report and statement, witness testimony, identification records, on-site investigation records and photos, the list of seized and restituted items, price appraisal opinions, the defendants' confessions, and other evidence, requesting the court to hold the defendants Luo and Wen criminally responsible for the crime of x. The defendants Luo and Wen had no objections to the facts and evidence of the charges and expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The facts and evidence found in the trial were consistent with those charged by the prosecution, and the court hereby confirms them.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 3 PM on December 21, 2015, the defendant Wu and the drug purchaser Ding (dealt with in a separate case) arranged by phone at a public telephone booth at No. 28 Xiangyang Street, Yao Tai, Yuexiu District, in a certain city, to purchase methamphetamine, negotiating the quantity, price, and other details. At around 5 PM on the same afternoon, defendants Wu and Ling sold to the drug purchaser Ding a small packet of drugs (weighing 4.88 grams and found to contain methamphetamine after testing) for 1,000 RMB at Exit A of Shiji Subway Station in Panyu District, in a certain city. After the transaction, they were apprehended on the spot by the police, who seized the drugs, drug money, and other items. The defendants Wu and Ling raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial, which are also corroborated by evidence including photographs of the seized drugs, drug money, and mobile phone used as a tool in the crime, photographs of the crime scene, screenshots of the mobile phone call records, urine test results of defendants Wu and Ling, the apprehension report, case report, and inspection records issued by the Kuangquan Police Station of the Yuexiu District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, the detention order and seizure list issued by the Yuexiu District Branch of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, call logs, household registration and Wu’s prior criminal penalties, testimonies and photo identification records of witnesses Ding, Chen, and another Chen, confessions of defendants Wu and Ling, and the Test Report No. SuiGong(Si)Jian(Huayan)Zi[2015]4742 issued by the Judicial and Forensic Examination Center of a certain city in a certain province, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ling": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On the morning of December 28, 2015, at around 9 AM, the defendants Zhang and Chai, on bus No. 2 in a certain city district, covered for each other and stole a wallet containing 685 yuan in cash from the shoulder bag of the victim, Li 1. After getting off the bus, the two defendants fled but were caught by the public. Following the incident, the public security organs seized the stolen property and returned it to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Chai during the court trial. Additionally, these facts are supported by the victim Li 1's statement, the testimonies of witnesses Li 2 and Zhang, the list of seized items, photographs of the stolen property, the list of returned items, screenshots from surveillance footage, the criminal judgment from the People's Court of Gulin County, Sichuan Province (2015) Gulin Criminal Case No. 142, the situation report from the public security organs, the defendants' household registration information, and synchronized audio and video recordings of the interrogations, which were presented and cross-examined in court and are sufficient to establish the case. During the trial, both defendants confessed to the criminal facts. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang argued that Zhang is a deaf-mute person, has a good attitude towards confessing, and as the stolen goods were recovered, a lenient punishment should be granted. The defense counsel for defendant Chai argued that Chai's act was an attempted crime; in the joint crime, Chai was an accomplice; Chai is a deaf-mute person and voluntarily confessed in court, thus a lenient punishment should be granted.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On June 3, 2012, defendants Han and Li, acting in concert and with premeditation, were aware that the victim, Lu, had been raped by Shen (who has already been sentenced) and that the incident had been reported to the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau. In order to help Shen evade criminal responsibility and avoid legal punishment, they fabricated evidence. They carried two written materials involving fabricated case details provided by Shen to negotiate with Lu. They reached an agreement with Lu at a bribe price of 48,000 yuan, demanding that Lu handwrite two false statements contradicting the facts of the crime and mail them in two envelopes to the Beigan Police Station and the Xintang Police Station of the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau, requesting the case be withdrawn. They subsequently gave Lu the 48,000 yuan provided by Shen. After the incident, on June 11, 2012, the victim Lu proactively went to the Xiaoshan District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau to report the incident, clearly stating the facts, and handed over the 48,000 yuan bribe money transferred by Han and Li on behalf of Shen, as well as an earlier 2,000 yuan, to the public security authorities. Following the incident, defendants Han and Li voluntarily confessed their criminal acts during police interrogation. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Han and Li during the trial proceedings. The evidence includes testimonies from witnesses Lu, Xu, Chen, Sheng, Zhang, and Shen, identification records, evidence collection lists and photographs, Lingtong card account records, item restitution document lists, seizure lists, text message photographs, letters from Lu, this court's criminal judgment document No. 2366 of 2012, injury evaluation reports, DNA identification reports, personal examination records, incident accounts, situation explanations, and household registration certificates of defendants Han and Li, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kaifu District in a certain city charged that on May 12, 2017, defendants Liu and Huang planned together to pickpocket. At around 9:30 am on that day, defendants Liu and Huang went to the vicinity of the Shahuqiao Market in Kaifu District of a certain city. In front of an unnamed marinated food shop next to \"Deyuan Snacks\" in the market, defendant Huang acted as a lookout and cover while defendant Liu reached into the pram next to the victim Peng, who was buying vegetables, and stole a red Apple 7 Plus phone (128GB). They later sold the stolen goods for 2,510 RMB. Defendant Liu received 1,260 RMB of the proceeds, and defendant Huang received 1,250 RMB. According to the price appraisal, the stolen Apple 7 Plus (128GB) phone was valued at 5,778 RMB. Defendant Liu was arrested by the public security organs on May 26, 2017. Defendant Huang was arrested on June 7, 2017. After the crime, defendants Liu and Huang truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The public security organs have recovered the stolen phone and returned it to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Huang during the court trial, and are corroborated by verified and true evidence, including the process of summons, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment and release certificates, on-site inspection reports, physical evidence photos, the testimony of witness Wan, the receipt for the return of stolen goods, the statement of victim Peng, the confession and defense of defendants Liu and Huang, the identification records, the conclusion of the price appraisal, and the expert opinion, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 14:30 on September 11, 2014, defendants Tang and Xia colluded with each other. Defendant Tang, using a China Merchants Bank credit card (card number 51×××13) given by defendant Xia, went to victim Mao's office at Room 702, Yinhai Business Building, 5th Qianjin Road, in a certain district of the city. They claimed they wanted to maintain the credit limit of the aforementioned credit card and intended to have victim Mao deposit money into the card first to repay the so-called overdraft. Then, they would use the credit card for false consumption, withdraw funds, and use the obtained funds to return the deposited money and pay a benefit fee to the victim. This gained the trust of victim Mao. When victim Mao transferred cash into the credit card as required and simultaneously extracted funds using a \"POS\" machine for card payment, defendant Xia altered the credit limit and inquiry password on the credit card, defrauding victim Mao of 26,412 RMB. Subsequently, defendant Xia withdrew 10,000 RMB from the credit card and gave it to defendant Tang. Upon victim Mao's report, the public security authorities arrested defendant Tang on September 11, 2014, based on the clues. Defendant Xia surrendered to the public security authorities on September 26, 2014. It was additionally found that the public security authorities returned the recovered 10,000 RMB in illicit money to victim Mao. During the trial process, the families of defendants Tang and Xia jointly compensated victim Mao for economic losses of 16,400 RMB. Victim Mao expressed forgiveness towards defendants Tang and Xia. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court trial and were sufficiently substantiated by physical evidence and video screenshots, the public security’s process of arrest and case-solving, basic information on permanent residents, seizure records, seizure lists, identification records, historical credit card billing transaction records and transaction detail tables, call logs, testimonies from witnesses such as Yin, statements from victim Mao, audiovisual materials, and other evidence.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was found that: From June 2011 to August 15, 2013, in a certain village within a town of a certain county, the defendant Li, along with Li Jia, Xu Jia, and Li Yi (all three have been sentenced), illegally constructed a small oil refinery. After the Spring Festival in 2012, they hired the defendant Ma as an accountant. The small oil refinery used waste tires as raw materials to crack polymer into crude oil under high temperature and high pressure, producing a large amount of wastewater, waste gas, and waste residue in the process. Li and others, without taking corresponding pollution disposal measures, discharged the large amounts of wastewater and waste gas into the environment, and directly piled the waste residue on the land, causing serious pollution to the surrounding environment. By the time of the incident, Li and others had illegally dumped this type of residue in the courtyard of the small oil refinery, weighing 151.20 tons. Upon inspection, the waste residue produced by this refinery was classified as type HW11 distillation residue in the national hazardous waste list and is hazardous waste. The cost to treat the contaminated site waste residue from this refinery is 475,200 yuan. On October 29, 2014, the defendants Li and Ma surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of a certain county. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Ma during the trial, and were confirmed by the court with the testimony of the convicts Li Jia, Xu Jia, Li Yi, Wang Jia, and Liu Yi, the environmental damage assessment report and other appraisals, the on-site inspection records, the case filing decision, the report from the county Public Security Bureau regarding their surrender, and the criminal verdict document (2014) Dong Criminal First Instance No. 131, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of January 25, 2015, defendants Su, Liu, and Qian, after consuming alcohol, went to the home of Zhang Moumou at 34 Hu Family Site, Zhonghua Village, Xincang Town, Pinghu City, and forcibly entered Zhang Moumou's residence by kicking the door, smashing the glass windows of Zhang Moumou's home. It is further found that on January 26, 2015, defendant Qian voluntarily went to the Xincang Police Station of Pinghu City Public Security Bureau to turn himself in, and truthfully confessed his crime. The criminal facts mentioned above were also acknowledged by defendants Su, Liu, and Qian during the court trial, and are corroborated by the case registration form, site investigation materials, witness testimonies, identification records and photos, price appraisal report, identity verification, and the inquiry documentation of unlawful criminal history, as submitted by the prosecutor and verified at trial. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Su": ["Detention"], "Liu": ["Detention"], "Qian": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that the defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao were security guards at Junrong Hotel on Dalong Street in this district. At around 2 AM on June 20, 2014, defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao, along with other hotel security staff including \"Brother Jie\" (handled separately), had a dispute over compensation for damaged items with victims Wu and Hong, who were consuming services at the hotel, in front of Junrong Hotel. The defendants Zhu, Qin, Yao, and others chased and attacked the victims with homemade knives, resulting in victim Wu being injured (classified as minor injury level one). At around 2 AM on July 6, 2014, victim Liu, the business manager of Junrong Hotel, had a dispute over work-related issues with hotel staff in the lobby of the hotel. Subsequently, victim Liu engaged in a fight with the hotel security guards present, including defendants Zhu, Qin, and Yao. During the altercation, the three defendants injured victim Liu by punching and kicking him (injuries classified as minor injury level two). The public prosecution agency has provided this court with documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions and defenses, forensic reports, on-site investigation and identification records, and audiovisual materials to support the facts of their charges.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that at around 3 a.m. on January 9, 2016, the defendants Chen and Ning sneaked into the Dujia Dam community on Changji Road in Yichang City and stole a three-wheeled electric vehicle belonging to the victim Liu. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric vehicle was valued at RMB 5,620. The prosecution presented and read out evidence to the court, including physical evidence, documentary evidence, the victim's statement, the price appraisal conclusion, surveillance footage, and the defendants' confessions.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ning": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From March 2014, defendants Xu and Li were employed by a co-defendant, \"A某某\" (who is being dealt with in a separate case), to rent a warehouse on the first floor at No. 32 Tongya Street, Tongde Street, Baiyun District, in this city. They used this location to store and sell clothing bearing counterfeit \"LOUIS VUITTON\" and \"GUCCI\" registered trademarks. On May 23, 2014, at around 2 PM, police officers arrested the two defendants at the above location and confiscated a batch of counterfeit clothing bearing the aforementioned two registered trademarks, valued at 219,130 RMB. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the prosecution presented forensic opinions, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and defendants' confessions during the court trial. Based on the aforementioned facts and evidence,", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Guanyang County, a certain district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charged that on August 20, 2013, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Liu and Hou experienced drug withdrawal symptoms and, due to having no money to buy drugs, conspired to commit theft. The two went to the home of a fellow villager, Huang, and used a pre-prepared key to open the padlock on Huang's door. Defendant Hou acted as a lookout while defendant Liu entered the room where Huang resided and searched the room, stealing a \"Baidi\" mobile phone from under the bed (valued at 346 yuan, according to an appraisal). Liu then stole 10,000 yuan in cash from a wardrobe in the room. Subsequently, both defendants fled the scene. Following the investigation, the police recovered part of the stolen cash amounting to 2,200 yuan and the \"Baidi\" mobile phone from defendant Liu and returned them to the victim, Huang. The remaining stolen cash had already been squandered by both defendants on purchasing drugs and for daily expenses. After the incident, on October 1, 2013, defendant Hou voluntarily surrendered to the police and truthfully confessed his crime. To support the above charges, the prosecution provided evidence including the defendants' household registration certificates, the appraisal conclusion, the defendants' confessions, the victim's statement, site identification and investigation records with related diagrams and photos, and lists of seized and returned items.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that: At around 12:00 on May 3, 2019, defendants Luo and Sun went to the entrance of the GreenTree Inn Hotel on Xieqiao Street, Jingkou District of this city, and seized the opportunity when no one was looking to steal a white Jixiang Lion brand electric scooter, valued at 2,526 RMB. On May 5, 2019, defendant Luo was apprehended by the public security organs; on the same day, defendant Sun surrendered to the public security organs. After the incident, the stolen electric vehicle was confiscated and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Luo and Sun raised no objection during the court trial, are supported by the statements of victim Yu, the price appraisal conclusion document, the incident and arrest processes, and other evidence, and are sufficient to be recognized.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between July 2017 and April 28, 2018, defendant Lu, for the purpose of profit, used WeChat to accept bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery from Zhang and Zheng (both dealt with in separate cases) and others, totaling more than 55,000 RMB. During the same period, defendant Hu, for the purpose of profit, used WeChat to accept bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery from defendant Lu, totaling more than 55,000 RMB. During the same period, defendant Zhu, for the purpose of profit, used WeChat to accept bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery from defendant Hu, totaling more than 65,000 RMB. During the same period, defendant Wang, for the purpose of profit, used WeChat to accept bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery from defendant Zhu, totaling more than 65,000 RMB. On April 28, 2018, defendant Lu was apprehended by this city's public security bureau officers; on May 3 of the same year, defendant Hu surrendered to this city's public security bureau and truthfully confessed his criminal conduct; on May 4 of the same year, defendant Zhu was apprehended by this city's public security bureau officers; on August 10 of the same year, defendant Wang surrendered to this city's public security bureau and truthfully confessed his criminal conduct. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lu, Hu, Zhu, and Wang during the court hearing process, and are corroborated by evidence such as the document of seizure, records of apprehensions, incident reports, personal information, testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Zheng, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Defendant Li held a grudge against Liu, the head of the department where Li's wife, Lu, worked, because Lu was dismissed by Eurasia Company. Li sought revenge and on December 17, 2012, at approximately 6 p.m., Li gathered defendants Fan, Ye, Wang, and Cao to attack Liu when he entered a garage in a certain district. Afterward, Li and the others fled the scene but returned upon realizing that Fan's phone had been left behind. They again assaulted Liu. An assessment determined Liu's facial injuries to be minor injuries. Following the incident, defendants Li and Fan turned themselves in to the police; furthermore, both parties reached a civil compensation agreement and fulfilled it. During the trial, the five defendants did not dispute these facts, which were corroborated by the confessions and defenses of Li, Fan, Ye, Wang, and Cao; Liu's statement; the testimony of witness Li Yi; the forensic examination report numbered (2012) 364 from a certain county public security bureau; the arrest certificate from a certain county public security bureau; the household registration certificates of Li and Fan, and the population information forms for Ye, Wang, and Cao; and the compensation agreement, all sufficient to establish the claim.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"], "Ye": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"], "Cao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on September 5, 2014, the victim, Yang, was deceived into going to a pyramid scheme location at Building 4, Unit 614, Victory East Road, Victory East New Village, a certain district in a certain city. On September 16, 2014, the victim, Wang, was also deceived into going to the same pyramid scheme location. Subsequently, the defendant Zhao, as the director of this pyramid scheme location, assigned the defendant Liang as Yang's mentor, and both were responsible for restricting the personal freedom of the two victims. Starting from September 16, 2014, Zhao arranged for the defendant Liang to assist the defendant Min in jointly guarding the victim Wang. During this period, the defendant Sheng acted as the caretaker of the pyramid scheme location and was responsible for managing the key to the main door, collaboratively restricting the personal freedom of the two victims. On September 21, 2014, the victim Yang took the opportunity to send a distress signal via a text message to the public security authorities, who promptly uncovered the pyramid scheme organization and rescued the victims Yang and Wang.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment"], "Min": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in the early morning of June 6, 2013, the defendant Cao, under the pretense of demanding a debt of 5,000 yuan, arranged to meet Jiang at a street night market in the district, and invited three others including the defendant Yang to wait there. Around 1 a.m., Jiang arrived at the location, and defendant Cao demanded 47,000 yuan and slapped Jiang's face, then forcibly took Jiang to the \"Shihui\" hostel near the university in the district. The defendants demanded Jiang repay the money again, and after Jiang refused, they struck his head. Subsequently, defendant Cao instructed three men to forcibly take Jiang to a pond side at Wujiejie Street in the district for a beating, then back to the \"Impression Accommodation\" hostel room near the university in the district, forcing Jiang to write an IOU for 30,000 yuan, and locked him in the room thereafter. Around 10 a.m., defendants Cao, Yang, and others forcibly took Jiang to pawn the gold necklace he wore unsuccessfully, and then brought him to the \"Zhen Yasi\" hair salon near a road community on a street in the district. Defendant Yang and others left, and defendant Cao forced Jiang to hand over the necklace and compelled him to rewrite the IOU for 20,000 yuan. Subsequently, police officers arrived after receiving a report and arrested defendant Cao. It was identified that Jiang had minor injuries; the gold necklace was valued at 6,693 yuan and returned after the incident. On September 27, 2013, defendant Yang surrendered at a police station in Jiangxia District, Wuhan City Public Security Bureau. The prosecution provided the following evidence to charge the above facts: 1. Physical evidence (photos); 2. Documentation such as household registration and incident details; 3. Testimonies from witnesses Chen, Wu, Zhang Jia, Wang, and others; 4. Statement from victim Jiang; 5. Confessions and defense from defendants Cao, Yang; 6. Appraisal report; 7. Identification records.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the evening of July 4, 2015, the defendants Wei, Yin, Zhou, and others had dinner together at Mabang Commercial Street in a certain city. At around 10 p.m. that night, Wei learned that Wang Mouyi, who owed him money, was playing cards in a chess and card room on Xiyuan Road in the district of that city. Wei, along with Yin, Zhou, and others, went to the card room and took Wang Mouyi outside. Zhou and others beat him and then forcibly took him into a car. Wei, Yin, Zhou, and others drove Wang Mouyi to Yuzan Hotel in Pizhou City and detained him there. At around 4 p.m. the next day, Wei and Wang Mouyi were taken inside for investigation by police officers outside the local tax branch office north of the Yundong Police Station of Pizhou City Public Security Bureau. According to the forensic identification by the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau, Wang Mouyi's injuries were classified as minor. On July 9, 2015, the defendant Yin was arrested by police officers from the Yundong Police Station of Pizhou City Public Security Bureau. On August 7 of the same year, defendant Zhou was arrested by local police officers in the Dongbang Xinyuan Community of a certain district in the city, and he was detained that night at the city's first detention center. The defendants Wei, Yin, and Zhou had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial. Additionally, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Mou and Wang Moujia, the statement of the victim Wang Mouyi, the recognition record, the live examination and identification commission, the IOU, the temporary detention certificate, the defendants' criminal responsibility age proof, and the case-solving process provide sufficient evidence for the determination of these facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Yin": ["Detention"], "Zhou": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that around 9 PM on October 30, 2013, defendants Li and Huang went to the entrance of Dongyuan Restaurant on Jiaoyu Middle Road, Yuzhou District, a certain city. Defendant Huang acted as a lookout while defendant Li stole a WY100T-A model two-wheeled motorcycle of the Wuyang brand from a place where Lu had parked it. After their success, the defendants took the motorcycle back to a certain county, where defendant Huang sold it off and the two defendants split the proceeds. According to the city's Price Certification Center, the stolen motorcycle was valued at 5,904 RMB. It was also found that defendant Li truthfully confessed to the theft, not yet known to the police, after being arrested for alleged drug use. Defendant Li committed theft to acquire funds for drug use. It was further found that defendant Li had been sentenced to ten months' imprisonment on March 5, 2009, by the People's Court of Luchuan County for committing a crime, and was released upon completing the sentence on June 3, 2009. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Huang during trial. They are substantiated by a record of acceptance of the criminal case, details of arrest process and proof of being at large, a site location map, site photos, site identification transcripts, Lu’s inquiry transcript, interrogation transcripts of defendants Li and Huang, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment No. 30 [2009] of the People's Court of Luchuan County, release certificate No. B067 (2009) from Luchuan County Detention Center, and the Price Appraisal Conclusion No. 776 (2013) from the City Price Certification Center, among other evidence, which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: In early July 2013, the defendant Wang had a conflict with Sheng over trivial matters. Wang called the defendant Yin to instruct him to find someone to teach Sheng a lesson. Yin contacted the defendants Liu, Zhang, Xu (handled in a separate case), and Gu. On the evening of July 6, 2013, around 10 PM, Wang indicated Sheng's location to Yin. Around 10:30 PM, when Sheng was passing near Xinxian Experimental Middle School, he was beaten by Xu, Zhang, and Gu and was injured on the left middle finger by a dagger wielded by Zhang. Yin and others then drove away. According to an appraisal, Sheng's injuries were classified as minor. To substantiate these charges, the prosecution presented and read the following evidence in court: 1. Confessions and defenses of the defendants Wang, Yin, Liu, Zhang, and Gu; 2. Statement of the victim Sheng; 3. Testimony of the witness Yang; 4. Five documentary evidences; 5. One appraisal opinion: Forensic medical injury appraisal report.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yin": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Gu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain state's Economic and Technological Development Zone charged: From July 1, 2012, to August 17, 2013, the defendant Xu used No. 101, Building 6, Polan Waterfront and Ithaca International City townhouses in the Economic and Technological Development Zone as operational locations. At the \"Mr. Wolf Sports Life Pavilion\" Taobao store he operated, he sold shoes that he knew infringed on the registered trademarks of \"Converse,\" \"Nike,\" and \"Jordan,\" and subsequently employed defendants Lou, Lang, and Qian to handle customer service, packaging, and other tasks. The defendant Xu and Lou collectively sold a total of RMB 69,187.26; defendant Lang was involved in sales totaling RMB 37,590.26, and defendant Qian was involved in sales totaling RMB 32,815. On August 26, 2013, the public security authorities summoned the four defendants, and seized 658 pairs of shoes infringing the \"Converse,\" \"Nike,\" \"Jordan,\" and other registered trademarks (valued at RMB 224,792). To prove the above allegations, the public prosecution authority presented at court: complaint materials, a statement of the rights holder's request for confiscation, testimonies of witnesses He, Jiang, Zhang, Chen, and Bai, online shopping records, the Alipay records of the involved online store, records of sales of counterfeit trademark sports shoes, appraisal certificates, price certificates, situation statements, data discs and situation descriptions, physical evidence photos, homepage and transaction pages of the involved online store, as well as the sales page of the seized sports shoes, search warrant, search records and photos, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, statements on the status of seized sports shoes, notifications and lists of evidence retrieval, return lists, business licenses, trademark registration certificates, notarizations, basic information on permanent residents, household registration certificates, case sources, details of the seizure, situation statements, and confessions of defendants Xu, Lou, Lang, and Qian, among other pieces of evidence.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on the night of February 23, 2008, defendants Huang, Tan, and Liang, along with co-defendants Mo (currently at large), Huang A (already sentenced), and Wei (already sentenced), conspired to steal sugarcane. They rented a small four-wheel agricultural vehicle to steal 11 tons of sugarcane belonging to Tan Huahua at the foot of Baihu Mountain in the Xinxing Farm; stole another 10 tons of sugarcane from Yao at the east side of the 18-kilometer mark on Liushi Road in the Xinxing Farm; and stole 8 tons of sugarcane west of the same location from Wu. They transported the stolen sugarcane back to their village in three trips for storage, and days later hired another truck to sell the stolen goods in another county, obtaining over 4,900 yuan, which was divided among them and spent. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Center, the stolen sugarcane was valued at 275 yuan per ton, totaling 7,975 yuan in value. On August 28, 2014, police arrested Huang and Tan; on September 2 of the same year, police arrested Liang. During the trial, the three defendants raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, statements from victims Tan Huahua, Wu, and Yao, on-site investigation records, identification transcripts, site maps, site photos, photos of the identified site, a price appraisal report and conclusion notice for the items involved, confessions from defendants Huang, Tan, and Liang, household registration certificates, and records of their arrest, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that between April and May 2018, the defendant He, without authorization, modified a nail gun into a firearm powered by gunpowder. During this period, the defendant Sun, knowing that He was modifying the firearm, provided him with an old barrel and helped attach the front sight. Later, on October 27, 2018, at around 3:00 PM, when the Great Wall pickup truck with license plate ××× driven by the defendant He (with Sun on board) was traveling near the Gao Liban Town Bridge, it was seized by the police officers on duty from the Keyou Zhongqi Public Security Bureau. They lawfully confiscated the aforementioned modified firearm, 41 lead bullets, and nails loaded with gunpowder from the vehicle. According to the appraisal by the Hulunbuir Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, the confiscated firearm was identified as a firearm powered by gunpowder. After the defendants He and Sun were brought to justice, they voluntarily and truthfully confessed their crimes. After being informed of the leniency system for confession and acceptance of punishment, and under the witness of duty lawyers Su and Na, they voluntarily signed the \"Statement of Confession and Acceptance of Punishment.\"", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the morning of May 3, 2016, the victim, Zhang Mouliang, was driving past the intersection of Jile Street in Liaoyuan Township, Chongzhou City, when the vehicle of the defendants Ni and Chen was temporarily parked in the middle of the road, blocking traffic. The victim, Zhang Mouliang, repeatedly honked the horn, causing dissatisfaction for the two defendants. Defendant Ni took a dagger from the car and slashed the victim's face. After the victim Zhang Mouliang got out of the car and fled, he was chased and beaten with stones and fists by the two defendants, resulting in multiple injuries to Zhang Mouliang's head, face, fingers of the left hand, and waist. The injury was identified as minor. At 9:45 a.m. that day, police officers from the Liaoyuan Police Station of the Chongzhou Public Security Bureau arrived at the scene and apprehended the two defendants. The dagger used by the defendant Ni was identified by the Public Security Management Brigade of the Chongzhou Public Security Bureau as a controlled knife. The aforementioned facts were confirmed as the defendants Ni and Chen raised no objections during the court hearing and voluntarily pleaded guilty. This was confirmed by this court. The case file includes the police case registration form and description of the apprehension of defendants Ni and Chen, the statement of the victim Zhang Mouliang, testimonies from witnesses Jiang Mouqiang and Peng Mouwu, the on-site inspection record, seizure list, the Chongzhou Public Security Bureau's identification of the controlled knife involved in the case, identification photos, injury photos, the forensic identification report on the degree of physical injury from the Chongzhou Public Security Bureau's Forensic Identification Office, as well as the confessions of defendants Ni and Chen and records of previous offenses, all providing sufficient evidence to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Ni": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on September 19, 2015, at about 16:00, Zhou A was riding a two-wheeled electric bike from the Chuanqi Electric Vehicle Factory in the Guta Subdistrict Office of a certain county to the Guangsen Electric Vehicle Factory in the industrial area of the county to exchange goods. While traveling in the middle section of Huashan Road in the industrial area, Zhou A collided with a white unlicensed Citroën car. After the collision, defendants Zhang and Shi got out of the car and had a dispute with Zhou, during which they assaulted Zhou, causing facial injuries and fractures to the nasal bone and frontal process of the maxilla. After an assessment, Zhou's injuries were classified as a second-degree minor injury.\n\nIt was further ascertained that on November 27, 2015, the families of defendants Shi and Zhang voluntarily reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhou as follows: 1. Defendants Shi and Zhang paid a one-time compensation to the victim Zhou totaling 70,000 yuan for medical expenses, lost wages, nursing fees, transportation fees, and emotional damages, which has been fulfilled; 2. The victim Zhou forgave the actions of the two defendants and suggested not pursuing criminal responsibility against them.\n\nThe above facts were not disputed by defendants Shi and Zhang during the court proceedings. The evidence included the victim Zhou's statement, testimonies from witnesses Li Jia, Li Yi, Sun, etc., the victim's hospital medical records, identification transcripts, forensic medical assessment on the degree of bodily injury (document number 534, 2015, issued by Ru Public (Criminal) Medical Examination Law), the compensation agreement, the withdrawal statement and receipt issued by the victim, proof of arrest, and household registration proofs of the two defendants, which are sufficient to confirm the allegations.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on October 29, 2017, at approximately 11 a.m., defendants Huang and Qiu conspired and subsequently, defendant Qiu went to the scooter parking area at the entrance of Zhixingtong Education, affiliated with Shuren Middle School in Gulou District, Xuzhou City. Using the scooter key provided by defendant Huang, they stole a white Yadea Zhu Yun model scooter parked there by Cai. They later hid the scooter under an apartment building opposite Minzhu Road Primary School. According to the appraisal, the stolen scooter was valued at 2,960 RMB. At around 8 p.m. that same day, defendants Huang and Qiu were apprehended on the spot by the police while attempting to relocate the scooter from the hiding place. After the incident, the stolen vehicle was recovered by the police and returned to the victim. The abovementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang and Qiu during the trial. These facts are supported by the victim Cai's statement, the police's case registration form, crime-solving process report, arrest report, identification record, photo identification, the appraisal conclusion of the stolen vehicle's value, a copy of the sales invoice of the stolen vehicle, the seizure order, the list of seized and returned items, audiovisual materials from surveillance, and proof of the defendants' household registration, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Fine"], "Qiu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that Huang, in collaboration with Zhang (both already sentenced), intended to sell their non-marital child, Huang (born on January 26, 2011). On November 21, 2011, Zhang rented the defendant Han's taxi, and Han contacted his brother-in-law Li to help pick up Huang from a certain village in Chibi Town, Chibi City, Hubei Province. On November 26, 2011, during the return trip, defendants Han and Li learned that Huang and Zhang intended to sell the baby. To receive the rental fee, they continued to drive the vehicle, assisting Huang and Zhang in selling the baby to various places, including a certain city in Shandong Province and certain towns. Later, through the introduction of Liu (already sentenced), Huang was sold for 39,000 yuan to a villager named Ai in a certain village of a certain town for upbringing. Subsequently, Huang paid Han and Li 10,000 yuan. On March 26, 2013, defendants Han and Li were arrested by the police from a certain city's Public Security Bureau. Han and Li raised no objections to the above facts during the court proceedings, which are corroborated by the confessions of their accomplices Huang, Zhang, and Liu, testimonies from witnesses such as Zhang, Hu, Liu, and Ai, the birth certificate of Huang, a written note from Huang to Ai, evidence of defendants' age of criminal responsibility, and details of the case investigation and arrest process, all sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early hours of March 14, 2017, at around 2 AM, the victim, Yang 1, after drinking, got into a verbal altercation with the defendant, Chen, over a lock issue at the entrance of the Maze Entertainment Club in Longshan Town, Longling County. During the altercation, the victim, Yang 1, first punched the defendant, Chen, in the face with his fist. Chen, along with the defendants Yan, Yue (who has been administratively punished), and Liu (who has been administratively punished), then proceeded to punch and kick the victim, Yang 1, knocking him to the ground. After being pulled apart by others present, the defendant, Chen, retrieved an iron tripod from near the Maze Entertainment Club and hit Yang 1 with it. The defendant, Yan, picked up a hollow pipe that had fallen from the tripod and continued to strike Yang 1, resulting in injuries to Yang 1's face and the back of his head. According to the forensic assessment by the Longling County Police Forensic Center in Yunnan Province, the degree of injury sustained by the victim, Yang 1, was classified as minor injury level two. After the incident, the families of the defendants, Chen and Yan, actively compensated the victim, Yang 1, for his losses and obtained his forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants, Chen and Yan, during the court hearing. Additionally, there is physical evidence, including one iron tripod and one iron hollow pipe; documentary evidence such as household registration proof, capture process, criminal judgment, evidence receipt list, return receipt, and receipts, application, explanation of circumstances, administrative penalty decision, mediation agreement, letter of forgiveness, receipt; testimonies from witnesses Yue, Liu, Mu, Shi, Zhou, Yang 2, Zhao, and Qiu; the victim Yang 1's statement; confessions and defenses from the defendants, Chen and Yan; the forensic assessment report No. [2017] 27 issued by the Forensic Center of Longling County, Yunnan Province; identification records, site inspection records, seizure records, photos of physical evidence, photos of the victim Yang 1's injuries, personal examination records, urine test report; audio-visual materials, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 8:40 on June 21, 2014, defendant Zhao, in collusion with defendant Liu, went to the front of a certain supermarket on a certain road in Lingshan Town, Jimo City. Zhao committed theft while Liu acted as a lookout, and they stole a gray two-wheeled Haojue motorcycle belonging to the victim, Wu, which was parked in front of the supermarket. Zhao later sold the stolen goods and squandered the proceeds. According to an appraisal, the value of the involved two-wheeled motorcycle is 2,470 RMB.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that from September to October 20, 2015, defendants Liu and Li jointly operated a sign processing workshop behind No. 31 Xiyanghuang, Linqu, Kunyang Town, Pingyang County. Defendant Liu was responsible for acquiring business and providing the workshop and processing equipment, while defendant Li carried out the technical operations. They discharged wastewater generated during the sign cleaning process directly outside, which was later discovered by the environmental protection department. Testing showed that the concentration of heavy metal copper at the discharge outlet of the sign processing workshop reached 16mg/L, exceeding the discharge standard by more than three times. After the incident, defendants Liu and Li surrendered to the public security authorities on October 27 and October 20, 2015, respectively. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Li during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the test report, on-site inspection records, identification records, the list of extracted evidence, identity information, and the process of surrendering, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. At around 2 a.m. on May 29, 2013, defendants Chen and Qiu, along with Zhang and Lin (handled in a separate case), went to the \"Cotton Fabric Market\" Phase I in a certain district of a certain city. They opened the market's rolling door, entered the market, and stole 1,004 RMB from the \"rocking car\" inside the market. 2. At around 3 a.m. on May 29, 2013, defendants Chen and Qiu, along with Zhang and Lin, went to the \"Bashu Overlord Fish\" store at the intersection of Zijin Road and Jiefang Road in a certain district of a certain city, where they stole a laptop computer (valued at 2,400 RMB) and 290 RMB in cash. The actions of defendants Chen and Qiu violated the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of X. It is requested that they be sentenced in accordance with the law. It was further ascertained that after the incident, a stolen laptop and 970 RMB had been recovered and returned to the victims. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Qiu during the trial and are supported by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified in court: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Statements of defendants Chen and Qiu; 3. Statements of victims Zhou and Gong; 4. Testimonies of witnesses Kang, Pan, Zhang, and Lin; 5. On-site identification records and photos; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. Arrest process documentation; 8. List of seized and returned items; 9. Power of attorney, etc. The evidence is indeed sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qiu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: Between 4 a.m. and 6 a.m. on March 31, 2014, defendant Liu, knowing that the copper wire was stolen goods obtained by Deng (handled in a separate case) and others, still helped transport the stolen copper wire to defendant Ye's recycling depot, located on a street in a certain village in Shifeng neighborhood, a certain county. Defendant Ye, knowing that this batch of copper wire was stolen property, still proceeded to purchase it. According to the appraisal, the 950 kilograms of copper wire involved in the case is valued at 37,724 RMB. The batch of copper wire has been confiscated by the public security organs and returned to the victim, Qiu Jia. Both defendant Ye and Liu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court trial. Additionally, the evidence includes the confessions of the two defendants on file, the statement of the victim Qiu Jia, testimonies from the witnesses Qiu Yi, Deng Yi, Wang, Shen, and Ye Jia, the \"Seizure Record,\" the \"Return List,\" the \"On-Site Inspection Record,\" the \"Identification Record,\" the \"Certain National Mobile Communication Customer Detail List,\" the \"Price Appraisal Conclusion,\" the \"Criminal Record Inquiry,\" the \"Case Circumstances,\" and the \"Household Registration Certificate,\" which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Yinchuan City charged that at around 2 a.m. on December 8, 2014, defendants Ding and Cao had a dispute with the victim Shen due to trivial matters at the entrance of a club on Xinhua East Street in a certain district of Yinchuan City. Ding and Cao beat Shen, causing injuries including acute closed craniocerebral injury, a subdural hematoma in the left parietal-occipital region, and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. According to forensic identification, the degree of Shen's injuries was classified as second-degree serious injury.", "label": {"Ding": ["Imprisonment"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. Around January 27, 2020, the defendant Wang sought to purchase drugs from the defendant Wu. The defendant Wu sold Wang methamphetamine tablets and a small amount of methamphetamine, collecting payment for the drugs. On the same day, Wang consumed some of the methamphetamine tablets, leaving 2 methamphetamine tablets and a small amount of methamphetamine. 2. On the afternoon of the 28th of the same month, a local resident named Zhang sought to purchase methamphetamine tablets from Wang. Wang acquired methamphetamine tablets from Wu and delivered several methamphetamine tablets to Zhang, collecting 200 yuan from Zhang as payment. Subsequently, Wang paid part of the drug money to Wu. 3. At around 19:00 on the same day, Zhang sought to purchase 3 methamphetamine tablets from Wang and transferred 180 yuan through WeChat as payment. Wang then sought to purchase drugs from Wu, who provided Wang with several methamphetamine tablets. While Wang was delivering drugs to Zhang, Wu made another transaction with a local resident named Liu and received 200 yuan via WeChat, entrusting Wang to deliver 4 methamphetamine tablets to Liu. While on the way to deliver the drugs, Wang discarded some of the methamphetamine tablets after being detected by investigators. Investigators found 2 red circular tablets and 1 vial of white crystalline particles on Wang. The next day, Wang led investigators to a flowerbed in front of No. 48, Ye Wan, Village, Street, Area, where he had discarded 10 red circular tablets. The net weight of the drugs found on Wang and discarded by him was 1.08 grams. Upon analysis, the drug-like substances tested positive for methamphetamine. The prosecution read out and submitted relevant evidence in court.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination and verification, it was found that on May 13, 2013, at around 19:00, Li (Party B) contacted defendant Cao via telephone, requesting to purchase approximately 1 gram of drugs. Defendant Cao agreed and arranged to make the transaction near the police office in a certain village, on a certain street, in a certain district of a certain city. Subsequently, defendant Cao informed defendant Li of Li (Party B)'s request to purchase drugs. Defendant Li, after contacting Li (Party B), arrived at the said location carrying drugs, and sold a packet of drugs to a plainclothes police officer posing as Li (Party B) for 400 yuan. After the transaction was completed, the police officer apprehended defendant Li on the spot and seized the drugs involved in the transaction and a mobile phone used as a tool for the crime. An appraisal confirmed that the drugs weighed 0.96 grams and contained methamphetamine. After being captured, defendant Cao reported the criminal activities of others, which were verified to be true. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Cao and Li during the court hearing, and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Li (Party B), Huang, and Hu, as well as identification records and photos, inspection records and photos, a list of seized items, physico-chemical examination reports, drug custody certificates, call records, explanatory notes, detention certificates and criminal execution notices, merit recognition opinion reports, birth medical certificates, arrest procedures, population information, criminal judgment documents, administrative penalty decisions, and community drug rehabilitation decisions, providing sufficient evidence for a conviction.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Rizhao City, Shandong Province, charges that on May 17, 2014, at around 3 PM, the defendant Ding, after drinking, caused a disturbance in front of a stall operated by a certain Liu on the commercial street of a certain village in a certain town of a certain district in Rizhao City, and assaulted Liu. After receiving a report, police officers from a certain town police station of Donggang Branch, Rizhao Public Security Bureau, arrived at the scene intending to take the defendant Ding back to the police station. The defendant Ding refused to cooperate, biting officer Liu on the neck, injuring officer Ding in the eye and kicking his leg, and tearing the clothes of both officer Ding and officer Zhang. The defendant Chen obstructed the police from taking Ding away and insulted and assaulted officers Ding and Yin. According to an assessment, the injuries of officers Ding and Liu constitute minor injuries. The prosecution submitted evidence such as household registration certificates, photos of the injuries, testimony from witnesses like Zhang, and forensic medical injury assessment reports.", "label": {"Ding": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on November 5, 2015, at approximately 21:40, Wu contacted the defendant Li by phone to purchase ketamine. Subsequently, Li and the defendant Wei went together to the Delicious 100 Restaurant on Longkun South Road in Qiongshan District, a city. Wei sold a small packet of ketamine to Wu in the men's bathroom on the second floor of the restaurant for 300 yuan. After the transaction was completed, the three were caught on the spot by the police. The police confiscated the 300 yuan of drug money from Wei, a mobile phone from Li, and a small packet of ketamine from Wu, who was purchasing the drugs. According to the forensic evaluation by the Public Security Judicial Identification Center of a certain city, the drugs confiscated from Wu weighed 1.5015 grams net and contained ketamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Wei during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the household registration information of defendants Li and Wei, the account of the incident, a list of seized items, the testimony of witness Wu, the confessions of defendants Li and Wei, the chemical analysis report, recognition records and photographs, site investigation records, orientation diagrams, and on-site photos, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On the afternoon of December 20, 2013, the defendants Long and Yu drove a black Hyundai sedan with the license plate Su S××××× to the entrance of No. 38, Yinjia Alley, Xiyan Village Committee, Hengshanqiao Town, Wujin District of a certain city. Taking advantage of the absence of people, they stole a female shepherd dog belonging to the victim Yin, valued at 12,000 RMB. After the crime, the dog was found by the victim Yin himself. Defendant Long actively compensated the victim with 10,000 RMB for economic losses and obtained his understanding. It was also found that after defendant Yu was captured, he voluntarily confessed to Long's criminal activities and assisted the investigators in persuading him to surrender. Defendant Long surrendered to the police at the Hengshanqiao Police Station, Wujin District Public Security Bureau, and truthfully confessed the facts on December 20, 2013. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Long and Yu during the trial, and were confirmed by the victim Yin’s statement record, testimony records from witnesses Ren and Gong, the incident report and arrest report produced and provided by the public security organs, photos of stolen goods, identification records and photos, surveillance video data, and the appraisal conclusion of the value of the involved items, which are sufficient to be recognized.", "label": {"Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the evening of January 17, 2015, after planning a theft, defendants Liu, Jiang, and Li each brought tools for the crime such as flashlights, gloves, and homemade keys to an alley near the station in Tiantou Village, a town in the city. Seeing that the iron door on the first floor of victim Yan Mouyi's house was open, defendant Li stood watch on the first floor while defendants Liu and Jiang entered the building through the door intending to commit theft. When the two reached the second-floor stairway, local residents discovered them and immediately apprehended all three defendants. It was further found that defendant Liu was involved in a fight during detention at the city's detention center in relation to this case. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Liu, Jiang, and Li during the trial, and they were supported by the testimony of victim Yan Mouyi, witness Yan Moujia’s testimony, inventory of seized items, flashlight, homemade keys, white gloves, on-site investigation report and photos, identification records, the appraisal opinion on detainee conduct from the city's detention center, the account of how they were brought in, household registration certificates, and the statements of the three defendants during the investigation phase, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on November 13, 2014, at around 19:00, defendants Huang and Wei were in a supermarket at Shangshang Jiayuan, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District, waiting for an opportunity to pickpocket. Defendant Wei acted as a lookout, while defendant Huang, taking advantage of victim Zhu's inattention, used tweezers to extract a Xiaomi 2S phone from victim Zhu's bag, after which the two fled. According to the appraisal, the involved Xiaomi 2S 16G phone was valued at 1,000 RMB. Around 21:28 on November 19, 2014, defendants Huang and Wei returned to the same location and used the same method to pickpocket victim Xiao’s Meizu MX3 phone. The appraisal valued the involved Meizu MX3 16G phone at 1,090 RMB. On November 20 of the same year, at around 19:00, defendants Huang and Wei were apprehended at a supermarket at Shangshang Jiayuan, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District. The public security authorities seized a silver pair of tweezers from defendant Huang as the crime tool. The aforementioned criminal facts were not disputed by defendants Huang and Wei during the trial. Moreover, they were corroborated by the defendants' confessions, the testimony of witness Yang, statements from victims Zhu and Xiao, the defendants’ identification documents, prior criminal records, arrest records, seizure warrant and inventory list, photos of the crime tool, surveillance video screenshots, documentary and physical evidence, value appraisal reports, on-site inspection records and photos, and other evidence presented during the trial, all of which were sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality accused: From February to April 2019, defendants Wu and Kang, together with Ma (separately prosecuted) and Zhang2 (separately prosecuted), falsely claimed to be aiding others in obtaining loans. Using the pretext that the client needed to transfer a vehicle under their name as part of the loan application process, they persuaded the victims to take out loans to purchase a second-hand car under Wu's name. After the loan was transferred to Wu's account, the group then sold the vehicle out of the province, resulting in excess loan amounts under the victims' names. Wu and Kang, together with others, committed fraud on four occasions, resulting in Bai Namu's name being saddled with an excess loan amount of 66,800 yuan, Lu having 102,000 yuan, E having 58,588 yuan, and Liu having 127,515 yuan; the total amount involved in the case is 354,903 yuan in RMB. To prove the facts of the charges, the public prosecution agency, under the court's auspices, interrogated defendants Wu and Kang in court and presented and read the relevant evidence.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On September 1, 2013, the defendant Wang set up 23 gambling machines with gambling functions for others to gamble in the storefronts of No. 103 to No. 105, Building 4, Lanxin Jiayuan Community, a certain district of a certain city. The defendant Hu, knowing that the defendant Wang had set up gambling machines with gambling functions for others to gamble, still accepted Wang's employment to serve as the lobby manager of the gaming room, responsible for the daily management of the gaming room, and recruited Zhao and Li (both handled separately) as attendants, responsible for providing services such as adding and deducting points on the gaming machines for customers. On the afternoon of September 10, 2013, the police inspected the gaming room, seizing 23 gambling machines with gambling functions and 6 gamblers on the spot, and confiscating gambling funds of 7,790 yuan and 7,825 yuan from Zhao and Li respectively (which have been turned over to the state treasury). On September 24, 2013, the defendant Wang voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the act of opening a casino. The prosecution has provided relevant evidence in court regarding the criminal facts charged in the indictment.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that from July to September 2020, the defendant Liu organized and invited others to participate in \"Three Card\" gambling activities at an underground restaurant set up in the home of the defendant Zhang, located in the Grain Bureau Residential Area of Xiangcheng District, Xiangyang City. Zhang was responsible for the daily management and expenses of the venue, and distributed chips to the gamblers. Each participant paid 200 yuan as a \"tea fee,\" which Zhang and Liu split equally. On September 16, 2020, Liu once again organized and invited Kou, He, Huang, and others to the venue. Liu, Kou, and six others engaged in \"Three Card\" gambling activities with stakes of 200 yuan to win 400 yuan, each receiving chips representing 30,000 yuan in gambling funds from Zhang. He, Huang, and four others engaged in \"Three Card\" gambling activities with stakes of 100 yuan to win 200 yuan, each receiving chips representing 20,000 yuan in gambling funds from Zhang. While the gambling activities were taking place, the participants were apprehended by investigators. At the scene, chips representing over 300,000 yuan in gambling funds were seized.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From the end of June 2013 to August 21 of the same year, the defendant Zhang instructed defendants Wang, Yuan, Mei, Meng, Wei, and others to force the victims Cen, Li, Zhou, and Hui to participate in illegal pyramid schemes to boost performance. They adopted illegal means such as confinement and limiting external communication. The victims were illegally detained at various locations, including Room 405, Building 1, Oil Factory Dormitory, Yangming Street in a certain city. Among them, defendants Wang and Yuan illegally detained victim Cen for more than 50 days and victim Li for more than 30 days. Defendants Wang, Yuan, Mei, Meng, and Wei illegally detained victim Zhou for 14 days, and defendants Mei, Meng, and Wei illegally detained victim Hui for 4 days. On August 21, 2013, defendants Zhang, Wang, Yuan, Mei, Meng, and Wei were apprehended by police officers from a certain city's Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang, Wang, Yuan, Mei, Meng, and Wei during the trial. They were substantiated by documentary evidence, photographic explanations, the \"capture process,\" demographic information, statements from victims Cen, Li, Zhou, and Hui, as well as search records and identification transcripts from the city's Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Mei": ["Detention"], "Meng": ["Detention"], "Wei": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Haizhu District in a certain city charged that on November 4, 2014, at approximately 20:00, defendants Yan, Zhao, and Xia were near the entrance of the Yuanqiang Chess and Card Club on Nancun Road, Haizhu District. In order to evade police officer Guo from impounding their illegally operated three-wheeled motorcycle, defendant Yan pushed away the on-duty police officer in an attempt to drive the vehicle away. Defendant Zhao then wrapped his arms around the officer from behind and held on, while defendant Xia hugged the officer’s legs, obstructing the officer's law enforcement activities. Subsequently, defendants Yan, Xia, and Zhao were apprehended on the spot. The facts mentioned above are corroborated by evidence including the registration form for accepted cases, decision to file a case, case investigation process, investigative report, on-site identification record of the criminal case, search warrant, search record, work certification, and on-site inspection record provided by the Haizhu District Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city. Other evidence includes photocopies of administrative enforcement measures certificates by traffic management authorities, on-site photographs, household registration certifications of defendants Yan, Xia, and Zhao issued by the Xiangcheng Municipal Public Security Bureau, a photocopy of the victim Guo's police officer identification, a photocopy of the city security officer's permit provided by witness Peng, statements and identification records of the victim Guo, the testimonies of witnesses Guan, Xu, Peng, Zeng, and the identification records by Xu and Peng, as well as the confessions and handwritten statements of defendants Yan, Xia, and Zhao, all of which are sufficient to support the charges. The defendants expressed no objections during the trial, adequately establishing the case.", "label": {"Yan": ["Detention"], "Xia": ["Detention"], "Zhao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it is found that in the early morning of January 31, 2016, the defendant Zhou had a verbal altercation with the victim Huang over trivial matters at a motel in the Hechuan District, Heyang City, located at the Fujiang First Bridge. Subsequently, the defendant Zhou engaged in a physical altercation with the victim Huang while holding a knife. Zhou then called the defendant Liu to come and assist in the fight. After arriving downstairs at the motel, defendant Zhou called the victim Huang to come down to resolve the dispute. The three of them moved to the sidewalk next to Qinglong Street, under the Fujiang First Bridge in the same district. Defendant Zhou slapped the victim Huang on the face, leading to a scuffle among the three. Defendant Zhou again brandished a knife, and together with defendant Liu, assaulted the victim Huang. During the fight, defendant Liu punched Huang in the face, causing Huang to lean back, at which point defendant Zhou took the opportunity to st", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On the evening of July 13, 2012, defendants Huang, Qiu, and He conspired to impersonate police officers from a police station to commit robbery. At about 1 a.m. on July 14, 2012, the three defendants, riding a black ladies' motorcycle, encountered victim Chen near the Fengze Gas Station on National Highway 107 in Xixiang Street, Bao'an District. They showed Chen an ID that resembled a police badge and claimed to be police officers from the Xixiang Police Station, asking Chen to assist in an investigation at the police station. Later, when the three defendants took Chen to a place under a bridge near an industrial area on Xixiang Street, they assaulted Chen and tied him up with a rope, robbing him of a Nuoxin A700 mobile phone (valued at 690 RMB according to appraisal) and 75 RMB in cash. 2. At around 3 p.m. on July 14, 2012, defendant Huang and another man (whose specific details are unclear and is being dealt with in a separate case) stopped victim Qin under the overpass at the Xin'an Factory in Huangtian, riding a black ladies' motorcycle. Huang and the other person showed an ID with a certain national emblem and claimed to be police officers. Huang falsely claimed that a fight had occurred nearby and asked victim Qin to go to the police station to assist in the investigation. Subsequently, when Huang and the other person took Qin to a secluded place, they tied Qin's hands and robbed him of a Nokia N73 mobile phone (valued at 220 RMB according to appraisal", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 5 p.m. on July 25, 2015, at Zhongyi Rubber & Plastic Co., Ltd. within the Jiezhuang Subdistrict Office in the High-Tech Zone of a certain area, a dispute arose over cleaning issues between the defendants Yuan and Qin. They pushed each other, and after colleagues intervened to separate them, defendant Qin pursued defendant Yuan to his dormitory. The two argued again, during which defendant Qin slapped defendant Yuan in the face, leading to a physical altercation where both parties were injured. Defendant Qin lost his second lower molar, fractured the crown of his third molar, and sustained multiple injuries to his neck, chest, and left eyebrow. Yuan suffered fractures of both nasal bones and a bite injury to his left thumb. According to forensic identification, the injuries sustained by defendants Qin and Yuan were classified as minor injuries of the second degree. On August 24, 2015, defendant Yuan voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. Additionally, it was found that during the trial of the case, defendants Qin and Yuan reached a mediation agreement. Defendant Yuan paid defendant Qin 4500 yuan for medical expenses, and they mutually forgave each other. These facts were not disputed by defendants Qin and Yuan during the court hearing, and were sufficiently substantiated by documentary evidence such as the case registration form, case handling notes, household registration certificates, outpatient medical records, and the mediation agreement, as well as the testimonies of witnesses Qu, Zhao A, and Zhao B, and the identification opinion.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain lake district in Ezhou City charged the defendants Liu and Sheng with the crime of X. On April 20, 2016, they filed a public prosecution with this court with indictment number (2016) 18 and suggested that the case be handled through a simplified procedure. After accepting the case, the court applied the simplified procedure according to law, conducted a sole-judge trial, and held a public hearing. The People's Procuratorate of a certain lake district in Ezhou City appointed prosecutor Zhang to appear in court to support the prosecution, and the defendants Liu and Sheng were present to participate in the litigation. The case has now been concluded. The public prosecution agency accused that during the fishing ban periods of 2013 and 2014 in a certain lake, the defendants Liu and Sheng illegally fished aquatic products using \"maze nets\" in the southern bay waters of a certain lake. On June 4, 2013, Liu and Sheng were caught red-handed by law enforcement officers from the management bureau of the lake in a certain province while illegally fishing with \"maze nets\" in the southern bay waters. On July 11, 2014, they were again caught red-handed doing the same. On September 10, 2015, Liu surrendered to the public security organ. On April 6, 2016, Sheng also surrendered to the public security organ. The defendants Liu and Sheng had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The case was supported by the following in-court evidence presentation and cross-examination, confirmed by this court: the confessions of Liu and Sheng, testimonies from witnesses Ye Jia and Ye Yi, identity information of the defendants, details of their surrender, explanations about \"maze nets\" and \"gill nets,\" documents from the provincial aquaculture management office, and administrative penalty decisions E Liang Guan Fa (2013) 2017 and (2014) 2007 from the provincial lake management bureau. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Fine"], "Sheng": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charged: Around 22:00 on a day in mid-July 2013, the defendants Lv and Zhang, along with the suspect Wang B (handled in a separate case), conspired to go to a certain village in a certain town in Suining County. They climbed over the wall into the courtyard of villager Wang A's home and stole a desktop computer. According to the appraisal, the involved computer was valued at 2,890 yuan. The defendants Lv and Zhang did not object to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and there are confessions from the suspect Wang B (handled in a separate case); witness testimonies from Wang C, Wang D, and others; on-site inspection records, site photos, identification records; the physical evidence appraisal report issued by the Public Security Bureau of Suining County; the price verification conclusion certificate from Suining County Price Verification Center; and evidence confirming the case and apprehension process, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lv": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: Starting in April 2012, the criminal suspect \"Guo\" (specific identity unknown, at large) hired defendants Lin, Lu, Hong, and others to engage in illegal cigarette trade in the city. \"Guo\" rented a warehouse on the ground floor of the Transportation Building, No. 3, Xinxiu Road, Luohu District, in this city, purchased cigarettes from other places, and handed them to Lin, Lu, Hong for receipt and storage. Once \"Guo\" found buyers, Lin and others would carry out the sales. On January 8, 2014, the police from the Luohu Branch of Shenzhen Public Security Bureau arrested defendants Lin, Lu, Hong while they were unloading goods in the warehouse mentioned above and confiscated various types of cigarettes used for illegal trade, totaling 5,749 cartons (identified as genuine cigarettes with a total value of RMB 366,680) as well as one truck used for the crime (license plate: [location] B×××××). To support the aforementioned facts, the prosecution submits the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence: a batch of cigarettes involved in the case, one truck; 2. Documentary evidence: search warrant and search record, seizure decision and inventory, certificate issued by Shenzhen Luohu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau, vehicle files, defendants' identification information; 3. Witness testimonies: testimony of witness Chen Mobai, account of the arrest by police officers; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of defendants Lin, Lu, Hong; 5. Expert opinions: cigarette and cigar identification inspection report, tobacco monopoly product pricing appraisal conclusion report; 6. Inspection, examination, and identification records: on-site inspection record, site map, site photos, identification record.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in July 2016, the defendant Ge, at XX Square, Jinghe Street, Hunchun City, falsely claimed to Jiang that counterfeit money could be used as real currency and proposed to purchase counterfeit money, proposing a purchase ratio of 1:5, to which both parties agreed. In October 2016, the defendant Ge, in collusion with Li, after discussions, collaborated at the Rhine River Cafe in Jilin City, Jilin Province, using 500 yuan of real currency disguised as counterfeit to make Jiang believe that counterfeit money could pass as real, and be used as such. The two then used spirit money, which they had prepared in advance, pretending it was counterfeit money, and defrauded Jiang of 140,000 yuan. Defendant Jiang purchased 700,000 yuan worth of \"counterfeit money\" from Ge and Li at a price of 140,000 yuan, only to later discover that the “counterfeit money” was actually spirit money. To establish the above facts, the prosecution presented evidence during the court proceedings, including the process of the arrest and case-solving, photos of physical evidence, a list of seized items, identification records, and the statements and defenses of defendants Ge, Li, and Jiang.", "label": {"Ge": ["Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"], "Jiang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In the early hours of December 21, 2016, the defendants Xu, Qi, and Tang conspired to steal motorcycles in a certain city. Tang then rode a motorcycle carrying Xu and Qi from a town in a certain county to No. 22 Juque Road in another town in the same county. Tang acted as a lookout while Xu and Qi stole a white Honda ordinary two-wheeled scooter parked at the entrance by the victim, Yang. They then rode the stolen motorcycle to the side of the newly constructed Highway 108 on the outskirts of the city, where Tang kept watch. Afterwards, Xu and Qi went to the Yongsheng Residential Area in the city, where they successively stole a white Honda ordinary two-wheeled scooter parked by the victim, Liu, at the entrance of Unit 3, Building 2, and another white Honda ordinary two-wheeled scooter parked by the victim, Qi, at the entrance of Unit 2, Building 1, Area 4. They then used the motorcycle they came on to transport the two stolen motorcycles in two trips to meet Tang at the side of the newly constructed Highway 108 on the outskirts. Since the two motorcycles stolen at Yongsheng could not be started, the three left them at the side of the new Highway 108 and rode Yang's motorcycle back to a town in a certain county to hide it under the color steel shed at Zhou’s home. At noon, Xu and Qi purchased ignition locks for motorcycles in the county and took a vehicle to the county, installed the ignition locks on the parked motorcycles, and each rode one back to a certain power pole factory. They sold Qi’s stolen motorcycle and hid Liu’s stolen motorcycle within the power pole factory’s courtyard. The stolen motorcycles have been recovered by the police and returned to the victims. According to the valuation: Yang's stolen motorcycle was worth 5,958 yuan; Liu's stolen motorcycle was worth 6,695 yuan; Qi's stolen motorcycle was worth 7,735 yuan.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: On July 25, 2013, defendant Xu (online name \"魔の少\") posted a thread on a local forum regarding victim Huang's illegal construction. Subsequently, under the pressure of online public opinion, Huang asked Xu for help in deleting the post and offered Xu a bribe of 3,000 RMB, which Xu did not accept. Later, Xu used this as a pretext to extort 10,000 RMB and four cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes valued at 2,600 RMB from Huang. On July 28, 2013, a report post appeared again on the local forum, which was published by Zhou and later edited by defendant Lou. The next day, Huang once again asked Xu for help in deleting the post. Lou, in collusion with Xu, extorted 10,000 RMB from Huang under the pretext of deleting the post. After deleting the post, Xu extorted an additional 1,500 RMB as a bribe from Huang. It was further found that the 10,000 RMB acquired by defendant Lou was handed over to defendant Xu, and Xu was instructed to return it. Of the extorted money, 9,600 RMB and four cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes, excluding the 400 RMB spent by Xu, were seized by the public security authorities and have been returned to the victim Huang. On August 2, 2013, defendant Lou voluntarily surrendered to the county public security bureau. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Xu and Lou during the trial, and are corroborated by the statement of victim Huang, testimonies from witnesses Song, Chen, Zhang A, Zhang B, Zhou, Hong, Zhang C, and Yang, photographs of the local forum webpage, search records and photographs, inventory of seized items, list of returned items, a CD, voice transcription records, a price appraisal conclusion from the county price certification center, proof of voluntary surrender, the defendants' household registration certificates, and the account of their capture, which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Xinhua District People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: On September 13, 2015, the defendant Wang (alias Wang A) in order to develop a pyramid scheme, lured the victim Yu to a certain city under the pretext of hiring staff for his cake shop, and brought Yu to a bungalow near the Fuyuan Vegetable Market in a certain city. Later, the defendant Wang, together with the defendants Zhu, Song, and Sun, brainwashed Yu by teaching pyramid scheme courses, persuading him to join the organization. When Yu expressed his unwillingness to participate and wanted to leave, the defendants Wang and others took turns guarding Yu, restricting his personal freedom. During this period, the defendant Zhu also physically assaulted Yu. After Yu failed to leave, he was forced to swallow a blade to self-harm. Later, during the hospital rescue, Yu seized the opportunity to report to the police, and Wang and the others were then caught by patrolling officers. It was also found that the families of the defendants Sun, Zhu, and Song each compensated the victim Yu for economic losses in the amount of 10,000 yuan, totaling 30,000 yuan. The victim Yu expressed understanding towards the defendants Sun, Zhu, and Song. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the four defendants during the court trial, and they were corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, the confessions of defendants Sun, Wang, Song, and Zhu, the statement of the victim Yu, the identification record of defendant Song for Zhu, Sun, and Wang, the identification record of the victim Yu for the defendants Zhu, Sun, Wang, and Song, the identification record of the four defendants for the crime scene, the hospital records of the victim Yu, the case handling notes, the mediation agreement, the receipt for the compensation payment, and the household registration certificates of the four defendants. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on a day in August 2013 and another day in late July 2014, Defendant Chen, in collusion with Defendant Ma, premeditatedly used Chen's position to steal approximately 150 meters and 200 meters of various specifications of power cables from the warehouse of Pinghu City General Electric Installation Co., Ltd. The stolen cables were then sold by Defendant Ma, and a profit of 70,000 RMB was made from the sale. Appraisal determined that the total value of these cables was 71,204 RMB. It is further ascertained that after the incident, Defendant Chen returned 71,204 RMB to the victimized company. The defendants did not dispute these criminal facts during the court trial, and the facts are substantiated by evidence such as theft reports, work proof, witness testimonies, search records, seizure orders, lists and photographs of seized items, receipts for returned funds, appraisal reports on value, records of unlawful conduct inquiries, the case incident report, explanation of circumstances, and identification proofs. These are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged: Between approximately March 10, 2014, and March 25, 2014, the defendants Ye and Li colluded to provide conditions for \"Show Hand\" gambling for gamblers Zhuang, Feng, Wu, Huang, Zhang, and others in a certain private room at the Bayidi Café on Siming West Road, Lanjiang Street, in a certain room on Siming West Road, Cloud Palace, Lanjiang Street, and in a certain room at Sunshine International, Yangming Street. Defendant Ye profited more than 10,000 RMB by taking a commission; Defendant Li provided gambling funds totaling 62,000 RMB to gamblers Zhuang, Feng, Huang, and Zhang and illegally gained over 1,000 RMB. On March 25, 2014, defendants Ye and Li were arrested by police officers of the city’s Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Ye and Li during the trial. These facts are substantiated by documentary evidence including photographs, vouchers for temporarily detained funds, a list of confiscated items, payment notices, administrative penalty decisions, the \"account of the arrest,\" identity information, witness testimonies from Zhuang, Feng, Wu, Huang, and Zhang, identification records and photographs, and examination records, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Ye": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendant, Zheng, is an employee of a certain national telecommunications company’s municipal district branch, responsible for the Unicom broadband services in a specific town in the district. The defendant, Yang, is an employee of a certain city’s communication technology company, responsible for the installation and maintenance of Unicom broadband cables in the area. In April 2013, because the Unicom broadband cables in the Tongchun residential area were frequently cut deliberately, leading to an increase in customer complaints, defendant Zheng instructed defendant Yang to pay attention to this matter. On the morning of April 19, 2013, at around 10 a.m., while working in the residential area, defendant Yang saw Wang, the victim and a staff member of Gulin Telecom, and informed defendant Zheng by phone. Defendant Zheng rushed to the residential area and met with defendant Yang near building 32. Defendant Zheng used an iron water pipe, which was prepared in advance, to repeatedly strike the victim Wang on the head, arms, and other parts, causing Wang to fall to the ground after being injured. During this time, defendant Yang also kicked the victim Wang. Subsequently, defendant Zheng called the police (defendant Yang was also present at the scene), and after the police arrived at the scene, both defendants voluntarily turned themselves in. After being apprehended, they truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. According to an evaluation, ", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charged that at around 20:00 on May 6, 2016, the defendant Bu, in collusion with E and Wang (at large), was having a meal at a certain hot pot restaurant and assaulted Hai over a trivial matter, causing injuries to Hai. According to the forensic examination by the Koryo Front Banner Public Security Bureau, Hai's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the first degree. After the incident, the two defendants voluntarily turned themselves in. During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence including household registration certificates; the victim Hai's statement; testimonies from witnesses such as Xiao; the forensic report on the degree of bodily harm; and the defendants' confessions.", "label": {"E": ["Surveillance"], "Bu": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City charges that in the early morning of October 21, 2014, the defendants De and Di, along with Ji (who is still at large), conspired beforehand to commit a crime at No. 130, Jixian Village, in a certain district of this city. With Di and Ji serving as lookouts, De climbed the external water pipe of the building and entered the victim Tu's house through a window, stealing a Sony mobile phone valued at 150 RMB. Subsequently, De, Di, and Ji went to No. 76, Yudai Village in the same district. With De and Di as lookouts, Ji climbed the building's external water pipe and entered the victim Zhang's house through a window, stealing a Dell laptop valued at 1,300 RMB. After the crime occurred, the public security authorities investigated and apprehended the defendants De and Di. The stolen items had already been sold, and the proceeds had been squandered. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants De and Di during the court proceedings and are corroborated by evidence including criminal investigation photos, the process of solving the case, purchase receipts, the statements of the victims Tu and Zhang, appraisal opinions on the value of the stolen goods, audiovisual materials, and the defendants' confessions, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"De": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Di": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city indicted that around 19:00 on October 31, 2013, the defendants Yan and He, together with \"Zhang\" and \"Liao\" (handled in a separate case), forcibly took Shi B, who was involved in a debt dispute with Jin, to the Manhattan Business Hotel in Keqiao Street, a certain district of a certain city. During this time, they verbally threatened and beat Shi B, forcing him to repay the debt. By around 20:00 on November 3, 2013, Shi B was rescued by police officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain district in a certain city. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Yan and He during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the arrest process and statements provided by police officers, accommodation records, testimonies from Jin, Ma, Zhao, Zhong, Shi A, the statement of Shi B, and the identification transcripts of the defendants Yan and He, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on November 5, 2016, at around 10:00 am, the defendants Wu and Yang went to the Kecaifu shoe store at the Xinlan Life Plaza on Daji Street, in a certain district of a certain city. Defendant Yang was responsible for covering, while defendant Wu took the opportunity to steal a VIVO X6 phone from the pocket of Wang, who was trying on shoes. The stolen phone was appraised at a value of 1200 RMB. The public prosecution agency provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the above facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charged that around 5 a.m. on February 23, 2015, the defendant Gao, after consuming alcohol, got into an argument with the victim Wang, with the intent to retaliate against Wang. Gao then gathered the defendants Bai, Cheng, and Yao (real name unknown, at large). Defendant Bai, armed with a baseball bat, and Yao, armed with an entrenching tool, along with defendants Gao and Cheng, entered Room 410 of the Home Inn on Saima Road North, Hohhot, where Wang was staying. Defendant Bai used the baseball bat and Yao used the entrenching tool to beat the victim Wang, while defendants Gao and Cheng also punched and kicked Wang, injuring his nose and face. During the beating, they knocked over a kettle of hot water, which scalded Wang's left leg. According to the appraisal by the Hohhot Public Security Bureau's forensic evidence office, the injuries to Wang's nose and face were identified as second-degree minor injuries, and the injury to his left leg was identified as minor", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 8 PM on May 11, 2015, defendants Feng and Ke were driving their vehicles to the roadside at the entrance of the Park Shijia construction site on Dijiao Qianjie in the Jiang'an District of this city. Due to heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic, their vehicles moved slowly. Defendants Feng and Ke suspected that the victims, Gui A and Gui B, who were walking alongside the road, had insulted them. Subsequently, the two defendants got out of their cars and attacked the victims Gui A and Gui B with weapons, causing injuries. An assessment determined that Gui A sustained minor injuries of the second degree, while Gui B sustained slight injuries.\n\nOn May 28, 2015, the police arrested defendant Feng; on June 8, 2015, defendant Ke voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the incident, through mediation by the People's Mediation Committee of the Danshuichi Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan City, relatives of defendants Feng and Ke voluntarily compensated victims Gui A and Gui B for their economic losses with amounts of RMB 50,000 and 10,000, respectively, and obtained the victims' forgiveness.\n\nThese facts were not contested by defendants Feng and Ke during the trial and are substantiated by evidence including the accounts of the police regarding the apprehension and case solving process, explanation of circumstances, police dispatch information forms, and case handling descriptions; statements from victims Gui A and Gui B; testimonies from witnesses, such as Zhang and He; inspection records and identification records; forensic clinical evaluation reports; video materials; applications, commission letters, commitment letters, receipts, and the people's mediation agreement; as well as the confessions of defendants Feng and Ke, among others, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment"], "Ke": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that: On October 1, 2013, defendant Luo, after contacting defendant Zhou by phone, prepared tools for the crime such as an oil pump, a screwdriver, and large plastic bags. Luo then drove a silver-gray Wuling Zhiguang van, rented under the name “Song” with license plate Gui G×××××, to meet Zhou at the Anshun train station. After meeting, Luo suggested stealing diesel fuel and replaced the van’s license plate with one provided by Zhou, Gui G×××××. At around 5 a.m. the following day, the two defendants drove the van to the area outside the perimeter wall of the parking lot at the industrial building site in Dashuigou, Dongguan Office, Xixiu District, Xing City. They used a screwdriver to pry open the fuel tanks and extracted diesel using an oil pump method, targeting the 0# diesel fuel in the tanks of three blue agricultural vehicles belonging to victims Zhang, Luo Jia, and Liu, parked in this location. The defendants placed the stolen 0# diesel into large plastic bags on the van, then drove the van inside the construction site parking lot perimeter, where they further targeted the 0# diesel fuel in the tanks of two excavators owned by victim Zhang. In total, they stole 300 liters of 0# diesel, valued at RMB 2235. After being discovered, the two defendants abandoned their crime tools, diesel, and the van at the scene and fled. The defendants raised no objection to the above facts during the trial. Additionally, evidence including the defendants’ househo", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: Defendant Mao had a debt dispute with Wei Yiyi, leading to a conflict between them. On June 8, 2015, around 3:00 PM, Mao invited Zhan, Xiang, Mei (at large), and others to take revenge on Wei Yiyi. Mao borrowed the car (license plate E J×××××) from his friend Chen and drove with Zhan, Xiang, and Mei, armed with steel pipes and wooden sticks, to the vicinity of Wei Yiyi's home in a certain village of a certain town. There, he instructed Zhan, Xiang, Mei, and others to smash the car with license plate E J××××× parked in front of Wei Yiyi's house, after which they fled the scene. According to the county's price appraisal department, the damaged car's loss was valued at 9,208.20 RMB.", "label": {"Mao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, the following facts were ascertained: Between September 27, 2012, and July 9, 2013, the defendants Yao and Zhou collaborated to set up a POS terminal at their business, \"Huitong Tobacco and Alcohol Store,\" located at XX Ruihu Road, Anyang Street, in a certain city. They provided credit card cash-out services to others by fabricating transactions, charging a commission of 1%-1.5% per 10,000 yuan of cash-out, paying a 0.78% fee to the bank. The total credit card cash-out amounted to over 3,100,000 yuan, with Yao and Zhou illegally profiting more than 10,000 yuan. On July 10, 2013, defendant Yao was apprehended by public security personnel within his tobacco and alcohol store, and the POS terminal used for the crime was seized. The following day, defendant Zhou surrendered to the authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. After the incident, defendants Yao and Zhou returned the illicit gains totaling 10,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Yao and Zhou during the trial, and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Chen Jia, Chen Yi, Tang, and Wang, as well as search records, seizure lists and photos, POS transaction records, documents provided by the Ruian Branch of the Wenzhou Tobacco Company, which include inventory lists, delivery notes, sales slips, shipping orders, the apprehension process, and demographic information, all of which are sufficient for a determination.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that from March 2015 to October 2015, defendants Wang and Zhang operated the Parkour Little Bear Shoe Factory at No. 9, District 4, Shicitou Village, Hengfeng Street, a certain city. Due to poor management, they owed wages totaling RMB 111,259 to 11 employees, including Xu Moujia and Yang Mou. On October 8, 2015, defendants Wang and Zhang absconded to avoid paying these wages and changed their contact phone numbers. On October 10, 2015, the Labor and Social Security Bureau of a certain city issued a labor security supervision order to Wang and Zhang, demanding rectification within a prescribed period. However, Wang and Zhang still failed to pay the workers their wages. Subsequently, landlord Ye sold the equipment and products left behind by Wang and Zhang, and the earnings from the sale were used to pay the workers by the labor department. On January 21, 2016, the police from the Xihu Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city in Jiangxi Province apprehended defendant Wang in Room 430 of the Xianshi Road Qianai Art Hotel in Donghu District, a certain city. On January 23, 2016, the police notified defendant Zhang to appear via a phone call. After turning themselves in, defendants Wang and Zhang truthfully confessed to the facts of the case. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Wang and Zhang during the trial and were corroborated by the testimony of witness Ye, statements from victims Xu Moujia, Xie, Yang, Qin, Xu Mouyi, Xu Moubing, Ge, and Fang, the labor security supervision order and delivery receipt, criminal record checks, situation explanations, wage payment status sheet, proof, defendants' demographic information, and the circumstances leading to their apprehension, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused: Between late August and September 4, 2014, defendants Song, Ke, Dai, Huang, Yin, Wei, and Tu operated a casino using the \"dice game\" method at No. 118 Moon Mountain, Xisaishan District of this city, and organized gambling gatherings five times. Among them: at around 3 a.m. on August 30, 2014, they organized more than 30 people to participate in gambling, with a total profit of about 5,300 yuan; at around 3 a.m. on September 1 of the same year, they organized more than 40 people to participate in gambling, with a total profit of about 6,000 yuan; at around 3 a.m. on September 3 of the same year, they organized more than 40 people to participate in gambling, with a total profit of about 10,000 yuan. There was one additional attempt that failed and another where they were caught on the spot.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ke": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial, it was found that at around 8 p.m. on November 1, 2019, defendants Luo, Liu, and Huo successively had meals and drinks at Xiao Cai Restaurant at Group 143 and at Maimaiti BBQ Restaurant. At around 1 a.m. on November 2, 2019, defendant Luo left Maimaiti BBQ Restaurant and walked to the roadside, where he nearly collided with Zhang, who was passing by on an electric tricycle, leading to a dispute between the two. During the argument, defendant Luo pulled Zhang off the electric tricycle and punched him. The two then engaged in a scuffle. During this time, defendants Liu and Huo exited the BBQ restaurant and rushed forward upon seeing the situation, and the three defendants collectively punched and kicked Zhang and Zhang's wife, Lei, who came to intervene. According to the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Eighth Division Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, both victims Zhang and Lei sustained minor injuries. Further investigation revealed the following: 1. On November 2, 2019, the police from the Xijiao Police Station of the Shihezi City Public Security Bureau summoned defendants Luo, Liu, and Huo to the police station by phone for investigation. Upon arrival, the three defendants truthfully confessed the main criminal facts of their and their accomplices' actions. 2. After the incident, defendants Luo, Liu, and Huo reached a compensation agreement with the victims Zhang and Lei. The three defendants agreed to compensate the victims for medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs totaling 25,000 yuan. The two victims issued a written letter of forgiveness, expressing understanding toward the three defendants and requesting leniency in their punishment. The above facts are confirmed by evidence such as the police case registration form and the decision to file a case, the victims Lei and Zhang's report materials and statements, witness Wang's testimony, defendants Luo, Liu, and Huo's confessions and defenses, on-site inspection records, site maps, site photos, surveillance video discs and descriptions, judicial appraisal documents, the letter of understanding, the process of the three defendants being brought to the case, and household registration information forms, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Huo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on August 24, 2014, at around 21:00, defendants Wang, He, and Yin went to the square on the south side of Jinhua Garden Community in a certain town of a certain county to the \"Old Yu Barbecue\" restaurant. Without any reason, they assaulted Yu and Qiao and damaged some items in the barbecue restaurant. The appraisal determined that the value of the damaged items was 2,488 yuan. On August 27, 2014, defendants Wang, He, and Yin turned themselves in to the public security bureau of a certain county. It was also found that defendant Wang and victim Yu had reached a compensation agreement, and the victim provided a receipt and a letter of understanding. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wang, He, and Yin during the court hearing. The statements of victims Yu and Qiao, testimony of witness Zhang, documentary evidence such as the case registration form, photos related to the case, police response registration form, hospital medical records, criminal judgment, case handling statements, certificates, household registration proof, identification record, and appraisal opinion from a certain province on the valuation of items involved in the case were sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Yin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At approximately 22:00 on August 18, 2014, after conspiring together, the defendants Yang and Long used Long's rented residence as the venue, located at Room 301, No. 56 Huahai Street, Xizhou North Road, Songzhou Street, Baiyun District of this city. Yang was responsible for dealing cards, and the two organized gambling with multiple participants at the aforementioned location, profiting through taking a cut. In the early morning of August 19 of the same year, the police apprehended the two defendants at the scene and confiscated one deck of playing cards used for gambling and gambling funds totaling 3,225 RMB. To substantiate the alleged facts, during the court hearing, the prosecution read and presented evidence including witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and the confessions of the defendants.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the afternoon of September 20, 2012, after a meeting at Jin Niu Microcrystalline Group Co., Ltd., a decision was made to have the defendant Zhao lead an investigation into the suspicion that employee Zhao [Note: This \"Zhao\" is a different person, translated as a placeholder \"Zhao X\"] leaked trade secrets. At around 8 p.m. that evening, the defendant Wang and others forcibly took Zhao X to Room 204 of the Jin Niu Glass Factory Guesthouse for questioning. During this period, the defendant Zhao questioned Zhao X and did not allow him to leave, while the defendant Wang arranged for personnel from the Security Department to take turns guarding Zhao X to prevent him from leaving. It was not until around 5 p.m. on September 24, 2012, that Zhao X managed to leave. In support of the above accusations, the public prosecution provided the court with the defendants' confessions and defenses, the victim's statements, witness testimonies, and relevant documentary evidence.", "label": {"Wang": [], "Zhao": []}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: 1. On a day in July 2012, the defendant Li purchased an imitation sniper rifle for entertainment at a store in the Yan Scenic Area for over 300 yuan. The firearm was confiscated by the police on November 30, 2012. Performance evaluation of the gun and ammunition showed that the firearm met the criteria of an air rifle and had the potential to cause injury. 2. On a day in August 2012, the defendant Li bought an imitation gun for approximately 4000 yuan from Xu’s outdoor goods store in Zijin Wusheng for use in live-action CS games. Performance evaluation of the gun and ammunition showed that the firearm met the criteria of an air rifle and had the potential to cause injury. 3. On a day in October 2012, the defendant Li purchased a high-pressure air gun from He (who has been sentenced) for 16,000 yuan, which included a large compressed air tank, two small compressed air tanks, and more than 2,400 lead bullets. This air gun was later used by Li for hunting. Performance evaluation of the gun and ammunition showed that the firearm met the criteria of an air rifle and had the potential to cause injury. The remaining 1,861 bullets were air rifle bullets with the same performance as the lead bullets. 4. In April 2011, the defendant Xu purchased a BB gun with a foldable stock online for 1,500 yuan. Performance evaluation of the firearm showed that it met the criteria of an air rifle and had the potential to cause injury. 5. In June 2011, the defendant Xu purchased two BB guns online at a price of 2,300 yuan each. One of them was equipped with accessories and transferred to Li for approximately 4,000 yuan, while the other one was kept by Xu. Performance evaluation of the firearm Xu retained showed that it met the criteria of an air rifle and had the potential to cause injury. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Li and Xu during the trial; they voluntarily pleaded guilty. The evidence, which includes a documentary inventory of the seized items, photos, household registration materials, the testimony of the witness He, the gun and ammunition evaluation report, the search record, and identification record, is sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at approximately 2 a.m. on August 3, 2018, the victim, Li, after drinking, had a conflict with the defendants Zhao and Guo over trivial matters at a beer stand in the city's cultural square. Subsequently, during the scuffle, Li pushed the defendant Guo to the ground. Upon seeing this, the defendants Zhao, Yi, and Du, along with defendant Guo, jointly assaulted Li, resulting in multiple injuries to Li's head and face. According to an assessment by the Jinchuang District Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center in a certain city, followed by an assessment by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Li was diagnosed with minor neurological symptoms from head trauma and left eye muscle paralysis with diplopia secondary to eye injury, classified as second-degree minor injury. The evidence supporting the above charges includes the victim Li's statement, testimonies from witnesses Li, Li, and Ma, injury photos, scene photos,", "label": {"Zhao": [], "Guo": [], "Yi": [], "Du": []}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: On January 14, 2016, at approximately 18:00, the defendants Liang and Chen drove from the Baimang Checkpoint in Xili Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, to the Tianhexuan Restaurant in Baozhu Garden, Xili, intending to steal someone else's property. At around 18:30, in the aforementioned restaurant, the defendants Liang and Chen took advantage of the victim Long's inattention, with Chen keeping watch and Liang executing the theft, and stole the wallet from the pocket of the coat draped over the back of the victim's chair. After succeeding, the two defendants quickly fled the scene. Upon verification, the wallet of the victim Long contained 4,700 yuan in cash, an identity card, a bank card, and other items. On January 22, 2016, the public security organs apprehended defendant Liang. On March 1, 2016, they apprehended defendant Chen. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Chen during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the notice of evidence collection, the arrest process, the defendants' identity information, the on-site drug testing report, the criminal judgment of the Futian District People's Court of Shenzhen City, a certain province (2012) Shenfu Criminal Initial No. 1120, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the criminal judgment of the Xinhui People's Court of Jiangmen City, a certain province (2015) Jiangxin Criminal Initial No. 331, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the administrative penalty decision, the case registration form, the public security administrative penalty decision, the decision of compulsory drug rehabilitation, the testimonies of witnesses Xiong and Zou, the statement of the victim Long, the identification transcripts of the defendants Liang and Chen, the Xilaon (South) Criminal Investigation [2016] No. 0126067 inspection work record, a CD, surveillance video screenshots, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liang and Chen, all of which have been verified as credible evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 16:00 on September 1, 2016, defendants Yu and Yang, at No. 9, Building 2, Floor 2, Gong'an Village, Jiang'an District in this city, had a dispute with the victim, Chen, regarding the debt settlement of their mother, Bai. Subsequently, Yu and Yang injured Chen by hitting his head, face, chest, and abdomen, resulting in soft tissue injuries to the head and face and multiple left rib fractures (left ribs 2-4). According to an assessment, Chen's injuries were classified as minor injuries, level two. On November 1, 2016, defendant Yu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authority after receiving a call from the police and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. On November 30 of the same year, the public security agency apprehended defendant Yang, who was listed as wanted online. During the trial at this court, the family members of defendants Yu and Yang reached a settlement agreement with the victim Chen, with Yu and Yang's family compensating Chen for economic losses in the amount of 30,000 yuan (excluding previously paid medical expenses), which has already been paid. Chen expressed forgiveness toward the actions of Yu and Yang. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Yu and Yang during the court proceedings. Additionally, the facts are confirmed by evidence including the arrest and case-solving procedures; statements of victim Chen; testimonies of witnesses Gong, Yuan, and Bai; basic resident information, detailed police response records, fugitive registration form, administrative penalty decision, prior situation explanations, medical records, temporary hospital payment receipts, settlement agreement, receipts and other documentary evidence; inspection transcripts; forensic clinical assessment report; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Yu and Yang, all of which are sufficient for validation.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it has been found that the defendants, Yang and Wei, were employees of the Bijie branch of the Hebei Communication Construction Company. They were responsible for installing base station equipment for the Jinsha branch of China Mobile Group Guizhou Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinsha Mobile Company). On June 26, 2011, at approximately 9 AM, the defendants, Yang and Wei, went to the warehouse of Jinsha Mobile Company located in Wulipo, a certain town, to transport the base station iron frames and stole four 800AH and three 500AH base station batteries that belonged to Jinsha Mobile Company from the warehouse. According to the certification by the Jinsha County Price Certification Center, the stolen seven base station batteries were valued at 2,700 yuan. The day after the incident, the defendants, Yang and Wei, returned the stolen batteries to Jinsha Mobile Company and obtained their understanding. The aforementioned facts are not contested by the defendants, Yang and Wei, and are corroborated by evidence such as: the defendants' household registration certificates, case acceptance registration forms, case filing decisions, documents related to bail pending trial, documents related to the revocation of bail pending trial, decision for approval of arrest, arrest warrants, and arrest notification documents, testimonies from witnesses Zhong, Zhang, Xu, a statement provided by Zhong Jia (warehouse guard of Jinsha Mobile Company), an explanation from the criminal investigation brigade of the Jinsha County Public Security Bureau, proof from the village committee of Huheyin Village in Xinji Town of a certain city and a disability certificate of Wang, proof from a certain city's detention center, the account of Wei's apprehension document issued by a certain city and Yang's apprehension document issued by Jinsha County Public Security Bureau, a letter of understanding, price certification conclusion and notification documents from the Jinsha County Price Certification Center, and the confessions of the defendants Yang and Wei, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on March 20, 2014, at around 16:00, the defendants Zhu and Wang conspired, with Wang first luring the retiree Chen, under the pretense of a massage, to the underground rental room at No. 750 Shuangfeng Avenue, Qianchuan Street, Huangpi District, in a certain city, in front of the Postal Savings Bank. They persuaded Chen to remove his jacket on the pretext of a massage. Zhu then took the opportunity to sneak into the room and stole cash amounting to RMB 4,200 from the pocket of Chen's jacket. During the trial of this case, the relatives of defendants Zhu and Wang returned the stolen money, RMB 4,200, on their behalf. The defendants Zhu and Wang, as well as their defense counsel, raised no objections during the trial to the above facts. The facts were supported by the statement of the victim, Chen; testimonies from witnesses Huang, Xue, Hou, Liu, Luo, Xia, and Tan; train ticket booking information of the defendants Zhu and Wang; the rental agreement; the account of their capture by public security agencies; identification records, including basic information and photos of the persons identified; list of seized items; the criminal judgment by the People's Court of Diecai District, Guilin City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region; as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhu and Wang. All these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that defendant Ding, on May 13, 2014, at approximately 21:00, forcibly demanded that victim He gamble with him in the Mahjong parlor located in the garage at 28 Building 103, Changshan Shibei Village, Chengdong Street, Jiangyin City. After victim He refused, a verbal altercation ensued, and defendants Shi, Ding, and Li beat victim He. During the incident, defendant Shi used a single-edged knife he carried with him to stab victim He in the left shoulder blade area. Subsequently, defendants Ding, Shi, and Li punched and kicked victim Wang, who came to intervene, injuring him. According to forensic identification by the Jiangyin City Public Security Bureau, victim He sustained injuries to his head, neck, and back, resulting in multiple contusions to the soft tissues on the right occipital area, strip abrasions on the right neck, and a 2.3 cm long wound on the left shoulder blade area. Victim Wang sustained injuries to his left eye area, with blunt trauma to the left eye and multiple soft tissue tenderness. The injuries of both individuals constitute minor injuries.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou Municipality charged that on August 4, 2013, at around 9 a.m., the defendants Shen and Long, after conspiring, took a motorcycle ridden by their accomplices \"Jiuping\" and \"Gougulu\" to the entrance of a China Mobile Communication business hall on Fengshen Avenue in Xinhua Street, a certain district. Under the pretense of sharing found money, they deceived the victim, Zhou, into going to a nearby section of the road at Fengshen Commune. Subsequently, defendant Long tricked the victim, Zhou, into revealing the bank card password under the guise of checking the balance, and defendant Shen obtained the victim's Industrial and Commercial Bank card (card number ×××4063) by swapping it. Afterward, the two went to an ATM of the Industrial and Commercial Bank on Huagang Avenue and withdrew a total of 10,000 yuan in cash from the bank card. On the morning of October 29, 2013, the defendants Shen and Long were arrested by public security personnel, and all the recovered stolen money has now been returned to the victim.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it is found that between September 2014 and April 2015, the defendants Hu and his wife, the defendant Li, engaged in organizing gambling activities through bullfighting at their shop on Tianlou Street in a certain town in this county, at the home of Qin, and at the place where Jiao's mother lived before her death. They collected a total profit of more than 30,000 yuan from these activities. After the defendants Hu and Li were brought to justice, they returned the illegal earnings of 30,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Hu and Li during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of 29 participants in the gambling, including Zhu and Jia, photos of the gambling locations and tools, the receipt for the returned illegal gains, the description of the case from the Guannan County Public Security Bureau, the documentation of the apprehension process, and the household registration certificate proving the identity of the parties involved. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 9 a.m. on March 22, 2015, defendants Zhang and Peng conspired together to go to the C exit of the Datieguan subway station on Dongxin Road, in a certain district of a certain city, where they used bolt cutters to cut the lock and steal an electric battery from an EV Ranges brand electric bicycle parked there by the victim Xue. The battery was appraised at a value of 210 yuan. Similarly, at around 4:20 a.m. on March 25 of the same year, defendants Zhang and Peng conspired to go to the B exit of Datieguan subway station, where they employed the same method to steal a Rapid Yamaha brand electric bicycle parked there by the victim Ma, valued at 1,600 yuan. Again, at around 1:30 a.m. on April 2, defendants Zhang and Peng conspired to go to the B exit of Datieguan subway station in a certain district, where they applied the same method to steal another electric battery from an electric bicycle parked there by the victim Wang. After successfully stealing the items, the two defendants were discovered and apprehended on the spot by officers from the Wenhui Police Station. Further investigation revealed that the battery involved in the case had been recovered by the police and returned to Wang. The above facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Peng during the court proceedings and are corroborated by the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhang and Peng, as well as the statements of the victims Xue, Ma, and Wang; testimonies from witnesses Wu, Pan, and Li; appraisal opinions; seizure lists; photographs; police reports; details of the capture; population information records; administrative penalty decision documents; cancellation of administrative penalty decision documents; surveillance videos; and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Shangcheng District in a certain city alleges that on November 27, 2013, at about 8 PM, Yang and Zheng arrived at room 212 of Pudding Hotel, located at 106 Zhongshan Middle Road, in the city to conduct a drug transaction. Yang sold a small packet of the drug methamphetamine (5.34 grams, identified to contain methamphetamine) to Meng, receiving drug money of 2000 yuan. Because Zheng requested to use methamphetamine, Yang gave a small amount of methamphetamine (0.99 grams, identified to contain methamphetamine) to Zheng for free for consumption, and then put the remaining drugs (2.71 grams, identified to contain methamphetamine) back into his own pocket.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In the early hours of October 24, 2013, defendant Chen, in collaboration with Ao Longhu (handled in a separate case), after planning, went to the front of Building 1, Unit 1, Floor 1, XX District, XX Street, XX City, and stole a Luxing brand Superhawk moped worth 1,870 RMB belonging to the victim Zhu using a screwdriver to pry open the keyhole and then hot-wiring it. In the early hours of November 7, 2013, defendants An and Chen, in collaboration with Ao XX, went to the entrance of No. X, XX Road, XX Street, XX City, and used a hex wrench they carried to pry open the keyhole and then hot-wire the vehicle, stealing a Thunderbird brand moped worth 2,000 RMB belonging to the victim Lu. The vehicle has since been recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants An and Chen during the trial and are corroborated by the statements of victims Zhu and Lu, the list of seized and returned items, vehicle sales receipts, price appraisal conclusion, identification records, surveillance video, criminal judgment, re-education through labor decision, arrest details, and the confessions and identification of defendants An and Chen, among other pieces of evidence, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"An": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that since 2015, the defendant Shen, without a retail license for the sale of fireworks and firecrackers, repeatedly purchased large quantities of fireworks and firecrackers from Yixing Jixiang Fireworks and Firecrackers Co., Ltd., Yixing Wanjiale Fireworks and Firecrackers Co., Ltd., and defendant Li. Shen sold these to Gu and 26 others, with total sales amounting to 227,597 RMB. On November 14, 2018, officers from the Wujin Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city discovered a large quantity of fireworks and firecrackers stored by defendant Shen at three locations: a room at address XXX, committee of a village in town X, district of a certain city, a house in village X, and a room at the entrance of XXXX. According to the price authentication center of a certain district, the total value of these fireworks and firecrackers was 189,040 RMB. Since January 2017, defendant Li, also without a retail license for the sale of fireworks and firecrackers, repeatedly purchased firecrackers from companies such as Liyang Tianma Company and Anhui Langxi Fireworks and Firecrackers Wholesale Co., Ltd., and then sold them to defendant Shen, with total sales amounting to 376,710 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Shen and Li during the court hearing. Additionally, the testimonies of witnesses Chu, Wang, Chen, Shen, and Teng, along with evidence including the incident arrest report, identification records, a summary table of IOUs, WeChat transfer records, inspection records, seizure lists, photos, a price verification conclusion issued by the price authentication center of a certain district, a certificate issued by the administrative approval bureau of a certain district, an explanatory note from the Liyang Safety Production Supervision Administration, and administrative penalty decisions, are sufficient to establish proof.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that since the summer of 2018, defendant Qiao, during the production of yellow wine at his home in Zhongying Group, a village in a certain town of a certain county, illegally added the food additive \"sodium cyclamate\" to improve taste and marketed it under the sign \"Laishun Yellow Wine.\" At the beginning of 2019, without checking whether the purchased yellow wine met safety standard certification, defendant Zhang bought yellow wine from Qiao and sold it to the public at his store, \"Zui Mei Xiang Guandong Wine Business.\" On July 23, 2019, the Xichuan County Market Supervision Administration conducted sample testing on the yellow wine sold at \"Zui Mei Xiang Guandong Wine Business.\" Test results showed that the wine contained sodium cyclamate at a concentration of 0.00961g/kg. By the time the case was discovered, defendant Zhang had sold a total of 35 jin of wine that did not meet safety standards, with total sales of 250 yuan. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Qiao and Zhang during the court trial. These facts are corroborated by witness testimony from Liu, a test report from Luoyang Liming Testing Services Co., Ltd., transferred file materials from Xichuan County Food and Drug Administration, identification records and documentary evidence site photos, transaction records, criminal record checks, procedural records, household registration proof, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Qiao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality charged that from June 20, 2015, to July 8 of the same year, the defendants Tan and Li, after prior consultation, provided gambling venues and equipment for gamblers at the homes of Xiao at No. 8, Yang at No. 721, Jin at No. 759, and the vacant house next to Li A at No. 282 in Xinwei Village, Ma'an Town, Keqiao District, Shaoxing City. They organized gambling activities using dice for social individuals, with Tan taking commissions and Li acting as a lookout. Until they were apprehended on July 8, 2015, they had illegally profited over 13,000 RMB. On July 8, 2015, at around 6 p.m., defendant Tan voluntarily reported to the Qianqing Police Station of Keqiao District Public Security Bureau in Shaoxing City and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The defendants Tan and Li raised no objections to these facts during the court trial, and they were corroborated by evidence, including inspection records, the apprehension process, testimonies from Zhang B, Song, Qiu, Ma, Yu, Zhang A, Zhong, Luo, Li A, Yang, Jin, and Xiao, identification records from Li A, Luo, Yu, Song, and Xiao, an identification record from defendant Li, and the administrative penalty decision, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city in a certain province charges: \n\n1. The facts of damaging public telecommunication facilities: \nIn mid-May 2016, the defendants Liao and Bai, under the instructions of a co-defendant \"Guangtou\" (to be dealt with in a separate case), committed the crime. Defendant Liao was responsible for driving a rented Kia vehicle with the license plate Min D×××××, while defendant Bai used the \"fake base station\" equipment and mobile phone installed in the car to send fraudulent China Construction Bank scam messages. During this period, the two drove through densely populated areas in a certain county, city, and district of the province, sending approximately more than 40,000 scam messages. On May 20, 2016, using the \"fake base station\" equipment, they sent scam messages to 21,468 users in the Licheng Street area of a certain district in a certain city, causing communication disruptions of varying degrees among these users. They were later caught at the scene by the public security authorities and brought to justice.\n\n2. The facts of dangerous driving: \nAt approximately 1 a.m. on March 5, 2016, defendant Bai was drinking several bottles of beer while having a late-night snack with friends at a food stall on Jiefang Road, in a town in a certain county of Fujian Province. Subsequently, he drove a car with the license plate Min C××××× while intoxicated and was caught by public security personnel at the traffic lights near Baolong Square in the same town. Testing revealed that defendant Bai had a blood alcohol content of 129.95mg/100ml. The public prosecution authority presented relevant evidence, including the appraisal report, the statements of the victim, the testimonies of witnesses, and the confessions of the defendant in court to substantiate the charges. Based on this,", "label": {"Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On the morning of March 20, 2015, the defendants Huang and Wu had a dispute and fight with the victim Wang due to a conflict over forest land rights. During the fight, the victim Wang was injured by the defendants Huang and Wu. According to the appraisal, the victim Wang sustained minor injuries of a second-degree nature. The evidence supporting the aforementioned facts includes the defendants' confessions, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, and the appraisal report, among others.", "label": {"Huang": ["Surveillance"], "Wu": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: The defendants, Wu and Quan, are husband and wife. On the evening of September 3, 2015, at the Ultrasound Fitness Park on Jinhuan Road in Jinping District, Shantou City, they sold 0.2 grams of methamphetamine (\"ice\") to drug user Jiang for a price of 100 yuan. The above facts are undisputed by the defendants Wu and Quan during the trial proceedings, and are substantiated by evidence such as the case registration form, decision to file a case, account of the case handling, household registration certificate, case handling explanation, site inspection report, compulsory detoxification decision, witness testimony from Jiang and identification transcript, and the statements and identification transcript of the defendants Wu and Quan. These are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Quan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Court of a certain county in Hebei Province charges that at around 1 a.m. on September 21, 2011, at the entrance of a restaurant on the south side of Taiji Square in a certain county, the defendants Chai and Jin, after drinking, unreasonably assaulted a passerby named Hou, causing Hou minor injuries. Subsequently, the two defendants took Hou to the \"Yulong Bath Center,\" where they spent 4,400 yuan and threatened Hou, saying, \"Don't report this after it's over, if you report, we'll ransack your home.\" The next morning, the two left, leaving Hou to settle the bill. The actions of the two defendants have violated article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The facts of the crime are clear, and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient. They should be held criminally responsible for crime x. Defendant Chai admitted to the crime charged by the prosecution without any dispute, pleaded guilty, and expressed remorse in court. Defendant Jin also admitted to the crime charged by the prosecution without any dispute and expressed remorse in court. Upon examination, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on September 21, 2011, at the entrance of a restaurant on the south side of Taiji Square in a certain county, the defendants Chai and Jin, after drinking, unreasonably assaulted the passerby Hou. They then took Hou to the Yulong Bath Center, where they spent 4,400 yuan and threatened Hou not to report to the authorities. According to the forensic examination by the evidence identification room of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, Hou's injuries were classified as minor. Commissioned by this court, the Handan County Justice Bureau conducted a social investigation on the two defendants and suggested the application of community corrections. The two defendants voluntarily compensated the economic losses of the victim. The defendants Chai and Jin raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial and expressed their willingness to plead guilty in court. There is sufficient evidence to support this, including household registration certificates, consumption receipts, the decision to file the case, the testimony of the witness Liu, the victim Hou's statement, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Chai and Jin, the injury assessment report, and the identification records.", "label": {"Chai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: 1. At around 20:00 on April 20, 2014, defendants Wu, Li, and Qin went to a certain internet café in a certain town of a certain county and stole a black moped parked on the ground at the entrance of the internet café by the victim Chen. Defendant Wu then used the moped and later sold it for 700 yuan. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of the county, the moped stolen from the victim Chen was valued at 2,400 yuan. 2. At around 00:00 on September 3, 2014, defendant Wu went with Huang A to the \"Jiangshan Internet Leisure Club\" on the East Road of the Great Bridge in a certain town of a certain county to access the internet. During the period, defendant Wu saw the victim Qin place an \"iPhone 4\" on the computer desk, and later, while the victim Qin was not paying attention, stole the phone and quickly fled the scene. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of the county, the stolen phone from the victim Qin was valued at 2,340 yuan. Defendant Wu was apprehended by police officers of the county public security bureau at \"Dream Internet Club\" at the bridgehead of a certain place in the county on September 3, 2014; defendants Li and Qin were apprehended by police officers of the county public security bureau at \"Heping Internet Café\" on Lixin Street in a certain town of the county on September 5, 2014. It was also found that the iPhone 4S phone stolen by defendant Wu had been returned to the victim Qin after the incident. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wu, Li, and Qin during the trial, and were corroborated by the confessions and defenses of the three defendants, the testimonies of witnesses Huang A, Huang B, and Tang, the statements of the victims Chen and Qin, as well as evidence provided by the county public security authorities, including the case registration form, filing decision, list of confiscated items, list of returned items and photos, household registration certificates, the process of capture, identification records and photos, appraisal notice, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that defendants Wang and Lu failed to execute the content determined by the civil judgment (2015) Yu Min Chu Zi No. 964 from the Yutai County People's Court after it became effective. After the Yutai County People's Court served the execution notice (2016) Lu 0827 Zhi Zi No. 360, the order to report assets, and other legal documents with execution content, and even after judicial detention, defendants Wang and Lu still did not fulfill the relevant content of the judgment. During this period, defendants Wang and Lu unauthorizedly used the Chery brand small car (license plate number Lu H×××××), which had been seized by the Yutai County People's Court and was owned by Lu, to offset debts to others. On November 22, 2017, defendant Wang was apprehended by the Jinan Railway Public Security Bureau Jining Station Police Department; on November 24, 2017, defendant Lu turned himself in to the Yutai County Public Security Bureau and handed over the execution funds of 47,054 RMB to the Yutai County Public Security Bureau. The prosecution provided the following evidence: 1. Household registration information, explanations of the case, the related written evidence such as the civil judgment (2015) Yu Min Chu Zi No. 964 from the Yutai County People's Court; 2. Statements and defenses of defendants Wang and Lu.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tiandong County, in a certain Zhuang Autonomous Region, charges that on the afternoon of March 8, 2015, around 3 PM, the defendants, Huang and Lei, went together to Tiandong Vocational and Technical School and agreed to rob if they found anyone gambling inside. Subsequently, the two entered dormitory building 4, room 406. Defendant Huang demanded money from Cai, while defendant Lei followed the victim, Yang, into the bathroom of room 406. In the bathroom, defendant Lei forcibly searched Yang and used his fists to beat him, robbing Yang of 500 yuan in cash. After the crime was solved, the public security organs recovered the stolen 500 yuan and returned it to the victim. The prosecution has provided relevant evidence to the court to substantiate the alleged criminal facts.", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: 1. Between February and March 2015, defendants Wang and Li went five times to the construction site of Phase III resettlement housing in the Binjiang Business District, a village in Chidian Town of a certain city, and stole a total of 300 iron fasteners (value undetermined). 2. On a night in March 2015, defendants Wang and Li went to the Gaokeng Village Apple Park real estate construction site in a certain town of a certain city and stole 120 iron fasteners belonging to the victim Gao (value undetermined). 3. During May 2015, defendants Wang and Li went three times to the basement of the Shimao B3 construction site in a village in Chidian Town of a certain city, and stole a total of 180 iron fasteners (value undetermined). On June 11, 2015, defendants Wang and Li, due to suspicious behavior, were questioned by a patrol team and voluntarily confessed the thefts mentioned above. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wang and Li during the trial, and are supported by documentary evidence such as the administrative punishment decision, the case-cracking report, testimony from witnesses Lin, Wang, Li, the statement of victim Gao, and the site identification record with its photos, making the charges credible and sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charged that at around 17:00 on October 8, 2013, defendants Yang and Zhu, along with Wang, encountered Zhou at the ferry terminal in Hepu Town, a certain county. Wang had a dispute with Zhou over a debt issue, and upon seeing this, defendants Yang and Zhu approached Zhou and beat him with fists and kicks, causing Zhou injuries, until they were stopped by Wang. An evaluation revealed that Zhou suffered fractures on his right 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th ribs due to the injury, but did not experience difficulty breathing. His injuries were classified as minor. On May 30, 2014, defendant Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of a certain county and truthfully confessed his aforementioned crime. After being apprehended, defendant Yang truthfully confessed his aforementioned crime. After the incident, defendants Yang, Zhu, and Wang reached a civil compensation settlement with Zhou and obtained Zhou's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yang and Zhu during the trial, and were confirmed by the statements of victim Zhou, testimony of witness Wang, recognition records, surveillance video, injury identification report by certain county public security judicial identification center, medical records, diagnostic reports, the settlement agreement, letter of forgiveness, situation explanation, criminal judgment, criminal incidental civil judgment, certificate of release, criminal record files, account of apprehension, account of the case, household registration proof, and other evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 17:00 on November 7, 2015, Zhang Moujia, Zhang Mouyi, Lei Mou, and others, after singing at Happy Time KTV in Moore City, Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District, Wuhan City, had a dispute with the cashier when they went to the front desk to settle the bill. Tong Mou (handled in a separate case), who was also preparing to settle his bill at the front desk, asked the waiter to serve him first. Zhang Moujia then pushed Tong Mou with his hand, which made Tong Mou furious and kicked Zhang Moujia to the ground. Seeing this, the defendants Zhou, Qiu, and others who were settling the bill with Tong Mou surrounded Zhang Moujia and started punching and kicking him. When Zhang Mouyi and Lei Mou went forward to intervene and reprimanded Zhou, Qiu, Tong Mou, and the others, Zhou, Qiu, Tong Mou, and the others then started to beat Zhang Mouyi and Lei Mou as well, afterward fleeing the scene. Zhang Moujia, Zhang Mouyi, and Lei Mou were injured as a result of the beat", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges that on the morning of April 14, 2015, defendant Zhu, together with defendant Xue, went to the parking lot at the north gate of Taixing People's Hospital and opportunistically stole an Aima brand electric bicycle that Sha had parked there, valued at 3,060 RMB. On May 6, 2015, defendants Zhu and Xue turned themselves in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. After the incident, the public security authorities lawfully recovered the electric bicycle and returned it to its original owner. During the trial in this court, the two defendants each voluntarily paid a property penalty enforcement deposit of 3,000 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during court proceedings and were corroborated by the victim Sha's statement, witness Mao's testimony, the valuation appraisal report issued by the Taixing Price Certification Center, the on-site inspection record made by the Taixing Public Security Bureau, and relevant photographs taken, which were sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At around 5 PM on October 30, 2013, the victim, Huang Jia, went to the Haoxuan Foot Massage Shop in Daye City to look for his wife, Li. After being informed by the shop employees that Li was not present, he insisted on going to the female workers' rest area to look for her. The defendants, Huang, Tan, and Shi, explained and tried to dissuade him. Huang Jia ignored the dissuasion, leading to a conflict between the parties, during which Huang, Tan, and Shi injured Huang Jia. According to the medical assessment, the degree of injury sustained by Huang Jia was classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants, Huang, Tan, and Shi, voluntarily reported to the public security authorities, truthfully confessed their criminal acts, compensated the victim, Huang Jia, with 60,000 RMB for economic losses, and obtained the victim’s understanding.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that defendants Guo, Xia, and Li conspired, with Guo contacting \"A\" (handled in a separate case) to provide gambling equipment and locations, Xia responsible for taking cuts during the gambling sessions, and defendant Li responsible for safeguarding the money box used for storing the illicit gains. Between April 12 and April 15, 2014, defendants Guo, Xia, and Li organized four gambling sessions using the \"Niu Niu\" method at Wuxi Hengyuan Machinery Co., Ltd. in Yangming Industrial Park, Zhuyuanlou Restaurant in Binhu District of the city, and the cafeteria of Wuxi Feishun Liquid Level Device Co., Ltd. in Yangming Industrial Park. They took in over 47,000 RMB by taking cuts from these sessions. After being apprehended, defendant Li truthfully confessed to his crimes. On September 18, 2014, defendants Guo and Xia voluntarily turned themselves into the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their crimes. After the incident, law enforcement confiscated 25,020 RMB in gambling money (processed by the police), 40 mahjong tiles used as gambling equipment, and one metal box. Further investigation during the trial revealed that defendant Li, based on the same facts of this case, was administratively detained for fifteen days by the police on April 17, 2014, and fined 500 RMB. These facts, as repeatedly confessed by defendants Guo, Xia, and Li in written records and undisputed during the trial, are corroborated by the testimonies of participating gamblers Shu, Zhang, Ma, Xu, Wu, Lin, and Ren, identification records of the defendants Guo, Xia, Li, the testimony of witness Wu, the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the evidence preservation list and inventory of confiscated items by the public security organs, the special receipt for temporarily seized money (items) from a certain province, photographs, the investigation process of the criminal case, and registered population information, confirming the validity of the case.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on the evening of November 15, 2016, the defendants Ceng and Liang, in order to help Li collect a debt from Xu2, went to Room 301, Unit 1, Building 6, a certain residential area in a certain county. They used threats and beatings to illegally restrict the freedom of Xu1, an employee of victim Xu2. Xu1 sought help from victim Ke. The next morning, Ke went to Xu1's residence and was also illegally confined by the defendants through threats and beatings. On the evening of November 17, after receiving a report from Xu1's boss Zhu, the police arrived at the scene, rescued Xu1 and Ke, and arrested the two defendants. They are charged with the crime of X (joint crime) and requested to be sentenced according to the law. The evidence supporting the charges includes testimonies from witnesses Zhu, Zou, and Li, statements from victims Xu1 and Ke, confessions from the defendants, an account of the case, household registration documents, etc. Defendants Ceng and Liang have no objections to the charges from the prosecution and plead guilty.\n\nAfter investigation, it was found that in November 2016, defendant Ceng heard from his good friend Li that Xu2 (sound) owed him payment for goods and had not paid, and Xu2 could not be found. Ceng offered to help Li collect the debt. On November 15, Li informed Ceng that Xu2 had rented Room 301, Unit 1, Building 6, in a certain residential area in a certain county for his employees. Li took Ceng to the residence but found no one there. At about 10 PM, defendant Ceng invited defendant Liang to help Li collect the debt. The two went to Room 301, Unit 1, Building 6, in a certain residential area, knocked on the door, and Xu1, who lived there, opened the door. The two defendants entered the room and asked Xu1 to call Xu2. After Xu1 called his boss Zhu, who said he did not know the two defendants and ignored them, the defendants stayed at ", "label": {"Ceng": ["Detention"], "Liang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on July 31, 2014, at around 7:00 PM, defendants Kang and Fan, along with Fan B and Zhao (both handled in separate cases), conspired in advance to commit robbery in XX Town, XX City. The four of them looked for potential targets along the Da Chen River and later waited under the XX Bridge in XX Town. At about 10:00 PM that evening, the victim Rui was pushing his bicycle past the area under the XX Bridge when defendant Fan acted as a lookout while defendants Kang, Fan B, and Zhao approached and assaulted the victim Rui, robbing him of an Apple phone valued at 650 RMB. The Apple phone has been confiscated and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Kang and Fan during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Rui's statement, the witness Pei's statement, the on-site inspection record, the list of seized and returned items, the on-site identification record, the co-defendant Fan A's confession, the statements of defendants Kang and Fan, identification documents, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yanta District in a certain city charged that on December 12, 2016, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Li and Dong went to the Yuhuazhai Street in Yanta District to commit theft. They saw the victim, a person referred to here as Li X, who was purchasing goods at the location. Li then stole an iPhone 6 from the outer coat pocket of Li X while Dong acted as a lookout. Afterwards, Li transferred the stolen phone to Dong, and the two fled. On the same day, they were apprehended by the police as they appeared suspicious. The stolen phone was recovered from Dong on the spot. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 2,745 yuan. After the case was solved, the stolen phone was retrieved and returned to the victim. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Dong during the trial, and were confirmed by the report materials, arrest process, household registration proof, extraction transcripts, seizure list, receipt documents, and other documentary evidence; the victim Li X's statement; the confessions of the defendants Li and Dong; the price appraisal opinion; and the transcripts and photos of identification and recognition, which are sufficient for conviction. The prosecution suggested that the two defendants be sentenced to approximately ten months in prison and fined.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On the afternoon of September 7, 2014, the defendants Zhan and Yin, with the intent of illegal possession, promised to pay a handling fee and persuaded Xu, a resident of a certain community in a certain county, to repay 50,000 yuan owed on a China Agricultural Bank credit card (card number 4033610025267039) on their behalf, claiming that after the repayment, Xu could withdraw the repaid amount using his bank card. This gained Xu's trust. On September 11 of the same year, after Xu transferred 30,000 yuan to the aforementioned credit card, Zhan informed him by phone to report the card as lost to the bank, and then reissued the credit card to withdraw cash using someone else's POS machine, defrauding Xu of 30,000 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of November 3, 2014, the defendants Zhan and Yin, with the intent of illegal possession, used the same method to gain the trust of Zou, also from a certain county, and prompted Zou to repay the same credit card's debt of 50,000 yuan on their behalf. The next morning, after Zou transferred 50,000 yuan to the aforementioned credit card, the amount was immediately withdrawn using a POS machine. Simultaneously, the defendants Zhan and Yin were apprehended by the police. This attempt at fraud was unsuccessful. The evidence submitted by the prosecution includes: documentary evidence; identification records; statements from the victim Xu and others; testimonies from witnesses such as Xu; confessions from the defendants Zhan and Yin, etc.", "label": {"Zhan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: Between December 2018 and April 2, 2019, defendants Jin and Tang formed a gambling group of 150 people in the instant messaging software \"Chat.\" Subsequently, the two took turns forwarding the room links of the \"Zhajinhua\" game in the \"Aimile Play\" game to the group for people to enter and gamble. After each round of \"Zhajinhua,\" the system automatically recorded scores, and the participants settled by sending red envelopes at a rate of 0.5 RMB per point as agreed. Jin and Tang each collected a room fee of 4 RMB for each gambling game room link they shared. The defendants Jin and Tang are to be held accountable for a criminal amount of 61,275 RMB, with Jin illicitly gaining 30,697.2 RMB and Tang illicitly gaining 24,305 RMB. After the crime was uncovered, Jin and Tang truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. Defendant Jin returned the illegal gains of 30,697.2 RMB, and defendant Tang returned illegal gains of 24,305 RMB. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Jin and Tang during the court hearing and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Geng, Wang, and others; household registration documents; case acceptance registration form; case initiation decision document; records of the occurrence of the case and how it was solved; bank transaction details; mobile phone screenshots; electronic data examination records; seizure lists, and other evidence.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Luqiao District of a certain city charged that between April 2013 and June 15, 2013, the defendants Guo, Yin, Tang, and others, while working at Aode Company located in a street of a village in the Luqiao District of a certain city, took advantage of the inattention of the workshop manager, Lin, to repeatedly conceal silver-plated materials and \"silver points\" from the material selection workshop on their person and stole these items during off hours. According to the appraisal, the value of the brass involved in the case was 668 RMB, and the value of the copper was 120 RMB. During the trial, on November 4, 2013, the defendants Guo, Yin, and Tang each paid 500 RMB to this court for restitution. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Guo, Yin, and Tang during the court hearing and were substantiated by the following evidence presented and cross-examined in court: 1. Statement by the victim Guo A; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Lin, Tao, Wang, and Hong; 3. Price appraisal report; 4. Surveillance video disc; 5. Details of the arrest; 6. Proof of household registration; 7. Receipts for payment. All the evidence is authentic, legal, and sufficient to reach a verdict.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that: In August 2016, the victim Pang's Zongshen brand dual-use electric and gasoline tricycle was stolen. Later, the defendant Chen, knowing it was stolen property, purchased the vehicle for 1,500 yuan and resold it to the defendant Wang for 2,200 yuan. Wang knew the vehicle was stolen property yet still bought it. According to the appraisal, the tricycle was valued at 5,780 yuan. On November 3 of the same year, Pang retrieved the stolen tricycle from the Tiefu Police Station of the Suixi County Public Security Bureau. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Chen and Wang during the trial. There is sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the case progress, household registration information, background checks on previous offenses, on-site inspection records, diagrams and photos of the scene, search warrant, seizure decision, seizure list, receipt, identification records, price appraisal conclusion, victim Pang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Chen Jia and Wang Yi, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Chen and Wang.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: 1. On the night of December 2, 2018, defendants Ge and Liu went to a vacated area undergoing renovation and demolition in a certain district of a certain city, and by climbing over the courtyard wall and disassembling gates, stole a total of five stainless steel double doors from No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road; No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road; No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road; No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road; and No. x, Lane x, Wenhua Road. 2. On the afternoon of the 4th of the same month, defendants Ge and Liu returned to the aforementioned location, using the same method to steal two stainless steel double doors from No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road, and No. x, Lane x, Yiqiao Road. 3. On the afternoon of the 5th of the same month, defendants Ge and Liu were discovered by patrol personnel, Mr. Wang, while attempting to commit theft in a certain district using the same method. Defendant Ge was apprehended on the spot. According to an appraisal by the price certification center of a certain district, the total value of the 8 double doors involved in the case is 6,600 RMB. After the incident, the family of defendant Ge has returned all the stolen money on his behalf. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Ge and Liu during the trial, and they are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xie, Wang1, Fu, Dai1, Zhang, Yuan, Dai2, Cao1, Zhou, Xia, Cao2, Wang2, and Ge1; criminal identification records; a list of retrieved evidence; an appraisal form for fixtures; lists of retrieved evidence; a return list; receipts; audio-visual materials; descriptions of electronic data production; a theft trajectory map; administrative penalty decision documents; criminal judgment documents; certificates of release after serving a sentence; household registration certificates; details of the arrest, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Ge": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that during the period from August to September 2013, defendants Liu and Zhong, along with Zhong X, Zhong Y, Certain X, and Certain Y (all dealt with in separate cases), acted with prior conspiracy and traveled to various locations such as a certain city, a certain city, and a certain city. They sought targets who were unfamiliar with banking operations or unable to use ATMs, pretended to be bank staff or helpful individuals assisting with ATM operations, and committed theft by luring victims away from ATMs to steal cash that was not yet deposited or transferred, as well as obtaining passwords to steal bank cards and withdraw deposits. Defendant Liu participated in 8 thefts, with a total stolen amount of 38,600 RMB; Defendant Zhong participated in 7 thefts, with a total stolen amount of 33,100 RMB. In support of the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including victim statements, witness testimonies, identification records, on-site identification photos, video surveillance footage, bank transaction details, criminal judgments, certificates, arrest records, household registration proof, and confessions from the defendants. Based on the above facts and evidence...", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: 1. On August 10, 2013, at around 19:00, the defendant Cai rode a motorcycle carrying the defendant Sun to the sidewalk near the Shunxing Auto Beauty Shop in Pubian Village, Anhai Town, a certain city. The defendant Sun snatched a white \"Apple\" 4S phone from the victim Lin (valued at 3023 RMB, according to the appraisal). 2. On August 19, 2013, at around 17:00, the defendant Cai rode a motorcycle carrying the defendant Sun to the Lingfeng Leather Factory in Bingcuo Village, Anhai Town, a certain city. In the passageway at the gate of the Lingfeng Leather Factory, the defendant Sun snatched a white \"Apple\" 4th generation phone from the victim Huang (unable to appraise the value) and caused a laceration on Huang's left pinky finger. According to forensic medical identification, the injury to the victim Huang's left pinky does not constitute a minor injury. In summary, the defendants Cai and Sun robbed property valued at 3023 RMB. The defendants Sun and Cai do not dispute these facts, which are substantiated by the case-solving process from the public security organs, the statements of the victims Lin and Huang, the phone certification and sales receipts, site identification, recognition transcripts, photos and descriptions of the identified personnel, basic information form of permanent residents, household registration certificates, criminal record proofs, health check registration forms upon entry to the detention center, interrogation and recognition video recordings, forensic medical evaluation report on the degree of bodily harm, document evidence review opinions, and price appraisal opinions on the phones, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 3 PM on October 14, 2015, the defendant Yang, after consuming alcohol, got into a dispute and fight with others at the entrance of \"Bozhou Restaurant\" on Xinzhuo Road, Huichuan District, in a certain city. The Ximalu Police Station of the Huichuan District Public Security Bureau in the city received an order from the 110 Command Center. Police officer Yang, along with auxiliary officers Zhao and Liu, wearing standard police uniforms, arrived at the scene in response to the incident. Defendants Yang and Huang ignored the officers' attempts to dissuade them and verbally abused and attacked the responding officers, violently obstructing the execution of official duties. It was only after additional officers arrived that the two defendants were taken to the public security agency. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence including the case registration form, decision to file a case, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification transcripts, criminal photographs, audio-visual materials, medical records, household registration certificates, explanatory notes, and multiple confessions and defenses by the two defendants. These pieces of evidence were presented, cross-examined, and verified during the trial, which are sufficient to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that defendant Jin, under someone's instruction, invited defendants Wei and Luo, among others, on December 8, 2013, around 17:00, to forcibly take the victim, Chen (aged 17), from the front of the Qinghe Personalized Wedding Photography shop located on Yanjiang Avenue in Jiang'an District of this city, under the pretext of collecting a debt. They forced him into a van and illegally restricted his personal freedom at several locations in this city, including an unnamed internet cafe on Youyi Road in a certain district of this city.\n\nOn December 9, around 23:00, the public security authorities arrested defendant Wei in front of the Juran Home on Xudong Avenue in Wuchang District of this city while he was there to negotiate repayment matters. Subsequently, with Wei's assistance, the authorities rescued the victim Chen around 0:30 on December 10 and arrested defendant Luo. Based on leads, the authorities captured defendant Jin on March 15, 2014. Subsequently, the victim Chen expressed forgiveness towards the aforementioned defendants.\n\nDuring the trial proceedings, none of the defendants objected to the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by evidence including photographs and video screenshots from the scene; basic information registration of permanent residents, official accounts and investigation details from the public security authorities, explanation notes, criminal reconciliation statements, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, identification records, and audio-visual materials, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Through trial, it was found that between March and April 2015, defendant Jiang, together with Lin (handled in a separate case) and others, rented various locations such as the Lingzhi Trading Firm in Mudu Town, Wuzhong District, Suzhou, a certain grocery store in a mountain area, a residential house in Lingyan Mountain, and a metal structure factory operated by defendant Cai in Hengjing Street, Wuzhong District, to open casinos. Defendant Zhu and others were arranged to handle tasks such as site coordination, \"taking a cut,\" and \"keeping watch\" in the casino, organizing multiple people to gamble in forms such as \"Tongzi 28,\" and taking a total profit of over 99,000 yuan. During this period, defendant Zhu took a cut of over 90,000 yuan, with an illegal profit of more than 4,000 yuan for himself. The casino was opened three times at the metal structure factory, obtaining over 50,000 yuan in profits, with defendant Cai illegally gaining over 4,000 yuan. After being apprehended, defendants Jiang and Zhu truthfully confessed the above facts. After committing the crime, defendant Cai voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed the above facts, and forfeited the illegal gains of 4,000 yuan, which are now temporarily held by the public security authorities. The above facts were all confessed by the three defendants in court and were proven by evidence such as the prosecution's account of the case development, the capture process, situational statements, testimonies of witnesses Lin, Chen Jia, Chen Yi, and Xie, relevant identification records, household registration proof of the three defendants, and defendant Cai's criminal record materials, all sufficient to be recognized. Regarding the defense counsel's objection to the amount of profit taken by defendant Jiang, upon investigation, the prosecution's determination of the amount of profit taken is based on testimonies from defendants Jiang, Zhu, and accomplice Lin, as well as witness Chen Yi and others, without any impropriety, thus this opinion is not adopted.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Kecheng District People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused: On the morning of November 6, 2013, defendant Yang, in collaboration with defendants Si and Su, carried tools for stealing dogs, such as iron pliers, iron rings, and iron cages, which they had prepared in advance. They traveled by a minivan with the license plate Zhejiang J××××× driven by defendant Su, seeking opportunities to steal local dogs in the rural areas surrounding a certain city. The three of them stole local dogs on four occasions, using iron pliers and iron rings while no one was around: at the road sign in Chijia Village of a certain township, at the intersection of a road to the north of a certain village of a certain township with the Kushishi line, at the garbage collection point west of Mapeng Village in a certain town, and next to a pavilion in a certain village of a certain town. They stole four local dogs owned by victims Lu, Zheng, Fu, and Wang, with a total value of 1999 yuan. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Yang, Si, and Su during the court proceedings, and they are corroborated by documentary evidence including the household registration information of the three defendants, the arrest process record, on-site notes, a list of secured evidence, photographs, the motor vehicle registration certificate, a list of recovered items, receipts for confiscated items, explanatory notes, summons certificates, administrative punishment decision books, detention release certificates, notices of non-detention/postponed detention, diagnostic reports, medical certificates, price appraisal reports, on-site investigation records and photos, statements and identification records of the victims Wang, Fu, Lu, and Zheng, and the confessions and identification records, as well as photos of defendants Yang, Si, and Su, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Si": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Su": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province charges that: At about 16:00 on December 12, 2019, the defendant Chen sold a small packet of drugs (net weight 0.55 grams, tested positive for methamphetamine) to Zhang for 1,300 yuan on the road outside No. 22-1 West Paifang Alley, Rulin Street, a certain district in this city. After the transaction, Chen was apprehended on the spot. A mobile phone used for drug transactions, a small black folding knife, and two small packets of drugs (net weight 0.36 grams and 0.55 grams, both tested positive for methamphetamine) were seized from him, and the drugs sold to Zhang were retrieved. Further investigation revealed that the drugs sold by Chen were purchased from the defendant Xiang at about 15:38 on December 12, 2019, near the entrance of the parking lot south of Walmart in Tangxia, a certain district in this city. At about 13:00 on December 13, 2019, the defendant Xiang was arrested at the entrance of his residence at No. 14, Shui Alley, Zhujiang Village, a certain district in this city, and two small packets of drugs (net weight 0.56 grams and 0.63 grams, both tested positive for methamphetamine) and a mobile phone used for drug transactions were seized, all duly confiscated. At about 22:00 on December 13, 2019, with the cooperation of Xiang, his supplier Liu Xiuxiu (handled in a separate case) was arrested, and a mobile phone used for drug transactions and three small packets of drugs (net weight 2.93 grams, all tested positive for methamphetamine) were seized from her on the spot.", "label": {"Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 3:59 a.m. on April 11, 2014, at the “Cool Animation Game Hall” in Wanxiangcheng Community, Guoyang County, while the victims Wang Ding and Wang Wu, siblings, were playing games with Wang Jia, Wang Ding gave up her seat to Liu, leading to verbal abuse by Ma (handled in a separate case) who was also playing games there. Wang Wu asked Ma why he was insulting her sister, and Ma then hit Wang Wu in the face and moved forward to beat Wang Ding, also using a stool to hit Wang Wu. At this point, Yang held Wang Wu from behind, while Wu picked up a stool and wantonly beat Wang Wu. After Yang released Wang Wu, he also hit Wang Wu with a stool. Then, Ma pulled out a knife he was carrying and insulted and threatened the victims Wang Ding and Wang Wu. According to the injury assessment report by the Guoyang County Public Security Bureau, the injuries of Wang Wu and Wang Ding were determined to be minor. After the incident, the defendant Yang actively compensated the two victims for their economic losses and obtained their understanding. The facts above were not disputed by defendants Wu and Yang during the trial, and were corroborated by physical evidence, including photographs of a dagger and stools, documentary evidence such as household registration information, the criminal judgment No. 35 (2010), the mediation agreement, receipts, understanding statements, the administrative penalty decision by Yingshang County Public Security Bureau, the seized items list, and testimonies from witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Liu, Guo, Wang Bing, among others, statements from the victims Wang Wu and Wang Ding, the injury assessment report by the Guoyang County Public Security Bureau, site inspection, examination, and identification records, audiovisual materials, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On October 21, 2012, at around 10:00 PM, the defendant You, in order to assist the defendant Zhang in collecting a debt, along with Xu (handled separately), Hu (handled separately), and Cao (handled separately), among others, found the victim Lu at the Pingbai Chess Room in a certain district of a certain city. Under the direction of the defendant Zhang, they forcibly took the victim Lu onto a taxi with license plate number A××××× of a certain place, and brought him to Chunwen Trading Store in Tangqi Town of a certain district of a certain city to meet with the defendant Zhang. Subsequently, the defendant Zhang, You, and others, together with Ding (handled separately) who arrived later, detained the victim at the store, coercing him to repay the money. Around 12:30 AM on October 22, 2012, the victim Lu was forced to write a loan contract and a guarantee agreement before being released. During this period, the defendant Zhang insulted, beat the victim Lu, and used a wallpaper knife to stab his left chest. The defendant You and Ding beat the victim Lu. According to the appraisal by the Physical Evidence Appraisal Office of a certain district branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city: the victim Lu's injuries were assessed as minor injuries. The evidence used for the charge includes the victim's statement, witness testimonies, the forensic report on the degree of human injury, the guarantee agreement,", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "You": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: On March 26, 2015, at about 8 a.m., the defendants Zhao and Kang had a dispute with Chen B over the construction of a house in a certain village in Jinhua City. During the scuffle, Zhao and Kang, knowing that officers Chen A and Chen C from Qianxi Police Station of the Wucheng Branch of Jinhua Public Security Bureau were present at the scene, ignored the officers' attempts to dissuade them and assaulted Chen B and others. During the officers' intervention, Zhao and Kang pushed Officer Chen A, causing Chen A to fall and get injured. Subsequently, defendant Zhao brought a piece of rebar intending to strike Zhang, and Officer Chen C tried to seize the rebar. Zhao, agitated, refused to let go and forcefully tugged at the rebar, resulting in Chen C falling and getting injured during the struggle. An assessment determined that both Chen A and Chen C sustained minor injuries. On April 10 and April 11, 2015, defendants Kang and Zhao were apprehended by the police. During the trial, defendants Zhao and Kang did not object to the aforementioned facts, which were corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen A and Chen C, the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia and Wang Yi, inspection and identification records and photos, outpatient medical records, evidence receipt lists, notification of forensic assessment opinions, forensic human injury assessment report, details of apprehension, population information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Kang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the indictment by a local People's Procuratorate, at around 1 a.m. on May 31, 2019, the victim Wang, accompanied by Pei and Liu, drove past the entrance of Yongqing KTV in Hunyuan County. Liu, feeling dizzy from alcohol, got out of the car and leaned against the front passenger side of a car parked by the roadside in front of Yongqing KTV. Defendant Li saw this and approached to inquire. Wang and Pei came over in turn, and a verbal disagreement between the parties led to a physical confrontation. Seeing the situation, Chen, Guo, Wang, and defendant Lin came out from Yongqing KTV. Defendant Lin rushed forward and punched Wang in the head, then scuffled with Pei. Taking advantage of the situation, defendant Li knocked Wang to the ground and repeatedly punched and kicked Wang's head and body. After the incident, Wang left and checked into the Apple Theme Hotel on Hengshan South Road. On June 2, 2019, Wang went to Hunyuan County People's Hospital for a check-up, accompanied by his wife, and was transferred the same day to Tongmei Hospital in Datong for surgical treatment. According to the Hunyuan County Forensic Identification Center, Wang sustained head injuries inflicted by others, resulting in intracranial bleeding and symptoms and signs of brain compression. The injuries were classified as second-degree serious injuries and a tenth-degree disability. To substantiate the allegations, the prosecutor read out and presented evidence such as documentary evidence, witness testim", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant Chai was responsible for advertising at XX City XX Vehicle Shop and received commissions on sold mopeds, while the defendant Li drove the advertising vehicle for XX Vehicle Shop. On March 18, 2014, the defendant Chai borrowed a \"fake base station\" (comprising a laptop, a box, a transformer, an antenna, and two sets of batteries) from Liu (handled separately in another case), which was installed by Liu inside the advertising vehicle. Subsequently, the defendant Chai instructed the defendant Li to input the advertising content of XX Vehicle Shop into the laptop. At approximately 1 PM on that day, the defendant Li drove the advertising vehicle with the \"fake base station\" around XX Street near XX in XX City. The defendant Chai turned on the \"fake base station\" to send advertising text messages to nearby mobile phones and was later apprehended by Yiwu Public Security Bureau personnel at around 4 PM on XX Road, XX Village, XX Street. According to the data comparison of the fake base station by Yiwu Mobile Company, 11,020 users were intercepted by the \"fake base station,\" causing network disruptions. The defendants Chai and Li did not object to the aforementioned facts during the trial. These facts are corroborated by evidence such as photos of the messages, the seizure warrant, the list of received evidence, records of network disconnection from the mobile company, the data comparison statement of the fake base station used at Tongdian, the circumstances of their arrival at the case, identification materials, testimonies from witnesses Cheng, Zhao, Liu, and Yang, statements from victims Zou and Chen, confessions from the defendants Chai and Li, the inspection report, search records and photos, recognition records and photos, and electronic data, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chai": [], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. Early morning around October 25, 2013, defendants Liu, Zhu, and Guan, along with Zhou (handled in another case), conspired and used a screwdriver to pry open the car window glass. They stole a Canon EOS 550D DSLR camera from the Nissan car with the license plate [Location] A×××××, parked under building 98-5 on Chengxiang Street, in a district of a certain city. According to the appraisal, the Canon camera is valued at 2,700 yuan, and the broken rear left door triangular glass of the car is valued at 206 yuan. 2. Around 17:00 on October 29, 2013, defendants Liu, Guan, and Zhu committed theft inside the Lotte Mart supermarket on Chengxiang Street in a district of a certain city. Among them, defendant Guan stole a pair of Crocodile brand leather shoes and one Yurun brand roasted turkey leg, totaling a value of 175 yuan; defendants Liu and Zhu stole one F&F brand military jacket, totaling a value of 144 yuan. 3. On a morning in July 2013, defendant Zhu stole one box of Yida brand chewing gum, four vegetable buns, one Mother brand beef stick, and one pack of chicken claws from the Lotte Mart supermarket on Chengxiang Street in a district of a certain city, totaling a value of 60 yuan. 4. On a morning in September 2013, defendant Zhu stole one Yurun brand roasted turkey leg from the Lotte Mart supermarket on Chengxiang Street in a district of a certain city, valued at 31 yuan. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Liu, Zhu, and Guan during the court hearing, and are corroborated by the statements of victims Lu and Chen, witness testimonies from Wu, Jin, and Wang, the identification records, search records, price appraisal reports, incident reports, situation explanations, surveillance video explanations, household registration certificates of defendants Liu, Zhu, and Guan, as well as prior offense records for defendants Liu and Guan, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tinghu District of a certain city accused that from 2013 to 2014, the defendant Yang, for personal profit, knowingly sold industrial rosin to the defendants Wu and Chen (dealt with in another case) on four occasions, totaling 350 kilograms, while knowing that Wu and Chen were using industrial rosin for de-feathering slaughtered poultry. After the Spring Festival of 2014, the defendant Wu, despite knowing that the state prohibits the use of industrial rosin for de-feathering poultry, used it to de-feather around 980 slaughtered white geese, which were then sold to various braised food processing points in the city's districts. After the case was uncovered, the defendant Wu reported to the authorities following a phone notification from the public security organs, and the defendant Yang was apprehended and brought to justice by the public security organs. Both subsequently confessed to the aforementioned facts truthfully. To substantiate the charges, the public prosecutor interrogated the two defendants in court, read and presented witness testimonies, inspection reports, the records and process of case uncovering and apprehension provided by the public security organs, identification records, seizure orders, and inventory lists as evidence.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: On March 17, 2013, defendants Cheng and Hou, in partnership with Yin (already sentenced), rented a house from resident Xiong in a certain town of a certain county (behind the old cement factory), to set up a casino. They provided gambling equipment for people to gamble using mahjong tiles in the \"Gong Niu\" manner. During the gambling process, Ying was the \"banker,\" Wang A kept the gambling funds for him. Among those who took turns \"sitting at the gate\" were Du A, Cheng, Hou, Deng, Guo, Hu, and Li, while Zhang A, Du B, and Zha engaged in \"floating bets,\" with each round involving cash stakes ranging from 20 to 300 yuan. Defendants Cheng, Hou, and Yin took turns collecting a rake of 20 to 50 yuan per round as profit from the gambling. At around 14:30, police officers from the Chengguan Water and Land Police Station of a certain county's Public Security Bureau arrested Cheng and 16 others at the scene, while another 4 people fled. A total of 27,067 yuan in gambling funds was confiscated. On August 13, 2014, defendant Cheng turned himself in at the Chengguan Water and Land Police Station of a certain county's Public Security Bureau; on August 19, 2014, defendant Hou also turned himself in at the same station. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng and Hou during the trial, and are supported by: 1. Testimonies from witnesses Ying, Xiong, Yin, Wang, Du A, Deng, Guo, Hu, Li, Zhang A, Du B, Zha, Wang A, Zhang B, Zhang C, Chen, Zhu, Wang B, and Huang. 2. On-site investigation records and photographs from a certain county's Public Security Bureau. 3. Physical evidence—photos of gambling tools including mahjong tiles. 4. Documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, and inventory of seized items. 5. Statements from defendants Cheng and Hou, among other evidence, are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that, since January 2012, the defendant Xia used QQ numbers such as 2219049814 to join QQ groups trading in citizens' personal information. By doing so, Xia met online users possessing citizens' personal information and purchased approximately 34 million pieces of citizens' personal information multiple times from multiple online contacts such as Han and others. Xia then sold this information to the defendant Ji and others within the QQ groups, making illegal profits exceeding 150,000 yuan. Since April 2012, after getting to know Xia through QQ, the defendant Ji illegally obtained about 12 million pieces of citizens' personal information from Xia multiple times and sold the illegally acquired citizens' personal information online for profit, making illegal profits exceeding 70,000 yuan. After the incident, Xia's relatives returned the illegal proceeds of 150,000 yuan. After being brought to justice, Ji assisted the public security organ in going to a certain city and district (to identify Xia's residence) to arrest the defendant Xia. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Xia and Ji during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence including CDs, household registration certificates, inspection records, identification records, testimonies of witnesses such as Han, work statements from the Laiwu Public Security Bureau, and the confessions of the defendants, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that starting in May 2013, defendants Wu and Hu, in the chess and card room they operated at No. 16, Xi and Yi Street, Shangchong Village, Xiangzhou District, a certain city, provided premises and gambling equipment and profited from the rake-off. At approximately 1 AM on July 30, 2014, police officers raided the casino and apprehended defendants Wu, Hu, and eleven gambling participants, including Liang, Qin, and Zeng. The police seized defendant Wu's gambling funds amounting to RMB 1,900 on the spot. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Hu during the court hearings and were corroborated by the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Liang Ming, Qin Gui, Zeng Yu, Huang Jie, Li Hua, Bao De, Wang Chun, Li Hua, Hou Jun, Liu Nian, and Yan Run, as well as the capture process, seizure order, inventory list, inspection record, administrative penalty decision, household registration data, and site and physical evidence photos, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from the end of 2012 to January 2014, the defendants Qin and Li, respectively taking advantage of their positions as the manager of the production department and supervisor of the wall switch injection molding workshop at Zhejiang Xinji Electric Co., Ltd., privately processed and sold about 234 kilograms of PC raw materials used for making panels and about 50.93 kilograms used for making bases to others. Additionally, on four occasions, they smuggled out a total of 112 bags, amounting to 2800 kilograms of PC raw materials used for making bases and panels, processed them outside, and sold products to Gao. According to the certification by the Leqing City Price Certification Center, the total value of the privately used PC raw materials was RMB 59,703. Furthermore, it was found that after the incident, 407.36 kilograms of PC raw materials and three boxes of products were recovered and returned to the victim company. On August 2, 2014, Qin's relatives reached a written agreement with Zhejiang Xinji Electric Co., Ltd. on compensation issues, compensating RMB 45,000 in one installment. The victim company requested a lenient punishment for Qin. On January 21, 2014, Li voluntarily came forth and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. During the trial, the defendants Qin and Li raised no objections to the facts established, supported by the testimonies of witnesses Gao, Zhao, Wei, Wang, He, Liu, Huang, Zhou, Chen, along with the account of apprehension, situation reports, price assessment conclusion report, reassessment conclusion report, search record, identification record, weighing record, CD, payroll details, reconciliation statements, purchase contracts, financial payment details, delivery notes, density lists, collection notes, bank statement details, company business license, labor contracts, explanation for the significant price change in the re-evaluation conclusion of Le Jia She Ren Zi (2014) No. 129, seizure list and return list, registration and preservation list, photographs, criminal judgment, proof of release from prison sentence, population information, phone inquiry record, prior record verification, household registration certificate, and other evidence. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that since 2011, defendants Zhang and Lu have been operating a grocery store opposite number xx, Entertainment Lane, Huzhai Village, Suxi Town, in a certain city. During their operation, they provided cards and mahjong for others to play and occasionally engaged in gambling activities. On the night of July 17, 2014, offender Sun (already administratively penalized) and others gambled in the store using the \"Niu Gong\" method. During this time, Sun entrusted gambling funds amounting to RMB 19,100 to defendants Zhang and Lu, who then placed it in the store's drawer for safekeeping. The next afternoon, offenders Wu, Li, Ma C, Wang, and Wei (all already administratively penalized) gambled in the store using the \"Ant Nine Points\" method. During this time, defendant Lu kept watch at the store entrance, and defendant Zhang collected a commission of RMB 20. At around 3 PM that day, defendants Zhang and offenders Wu, Li, Ma C, Wang, and Wei were caught on-site by municipal police officers, who confiscated a total of RMB 51,550 in gambling funds (including RMB 19,100 entrusted by Sun) and RMB 20 collected as a commission. On August 6, 2014, defendant Lu voluntarily turned himself in at the Suxi Police Substation of the municipal police bureau.\n\nThe above facts are undisputed by defendants Zhang and Lu during the trial. Additionally, there is substantial evidence to support these facts, such as the administrative penalty decision, detention memorandum, seizure list, prepayment (temporary detention) receipt from the province, decision for evidence preservation, evidence preservation list, confiscated items list, application form, apprehension report, self-surrender recognition opinion, population information, testimony from witnesses Ma A, Ma B, Wei, Wang, Ma C, Wu, Li, Sun, identification records, records and photos from the gambling site, inspection transcript, and statements from defendants Zhang and Lu, all sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 23:00 on June 20, 2013, defendants Zhang, Lei, Yang, and Wang (handled in a separate case) had a quarrel with the victim, Song, over trivial matters after leaving Baidu KTV at the intersection of Bohai Seventh Road and Yellow River Third Road in Bincheng District. Subsequently, Zhang, Lei, Yang, and Wang followed Song to the entrance of Xiaodong Xiaoxi Store on the west side of Baidu KTV and continued to dispute. Song took a blue metal rod from the trunk of his gray Buick sedan (license plate Lu M×××××) and chased and hit Zhang and others. Defendant Lei knocked Song to the ground, and then defendants Lei, Zhang, and Yang used sticks to beat Song and smashed various parts of Song’s gray Buick sedan, including the front windshield, mirrors, and trunk, causing an economic loss of 1,856 yuan. Wang drove a QQ car over Song’s body, and the aforementioned individuals fled the scene. According to a forensic examination, Song sustained a Grade 1 minor inju", "label": {"Zhang": [], "Lei": [], "Yang": []}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 2 AM on December 10, 2014, defendants Mao, Su, Song, Guo (already convicted), and others were eating at the “Shuxin” Malatang on the south side of the People's Square in Shouguang City. During the meal, defendant Mao heard Liu Ding, who was at a neighboring table, speaking ill of Tian with a friend, which made Mao dissatisfied and want to hit Liu Ding. Liu Wu, who was dining with Liu Ding, tried to stop him. Defendant Mao and Liu Wu got into a fight, after which defendants Mao, Su, Song, Guo, and others used sticks, machetes, and daggers to assault Liu Wu, resulting in Liu Wu suffering a pneumothorax and a fracture of the right fibula. Upon appraisal, the injuries of victim Liu Wu, namely the traumatic pneumothorax and fracture of the right fibula, were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendant Song turned himself in to the public security authorities on January 26, 2015. Through mediation, defendants Mao and Song have compensated the victim Liu Wu a total of 36,000 yuan for economic losses and received forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim Liu Wu, testimonies of witnesses Guo, Liu Jia, Liu Yi, Sun, Gu, Liu Bing, Wang, Liu Ding, the criminal case registration form, the capture process, case explanation, population information, inventory of seized items, criminal judgment, mediation agreement, and the forensic appraisal of the degree of human injury, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Su": ["Imprisonment"], "Mao": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon reviewing the case, it has been determined that in January 2016, the defendant Yang gathered several individuals to collect a debt owed to the victim Wang's friend. After the incident, Wang compensated Yang as agreed, but Yang demanded a 20,000 yuan settlement from Wang, claiming injuries sustained by the individuals he called. Unable to contact the friend who had entrusted him with the task, Wang ceased contact with Yang. On February 24, 2016, at approximately 11 p.m., Yang went to Wang's residence, located at Room 703, Block A, Hongqiao Yayuan, West Section of Longshou North Road, Lianhu District in this city. As Wang was about to go out, Yang forcefully intercepted him, forcing Wang back into his apartment and coerced him into writing an IOU for 20,000 yuan. On February 25, 2016, at around 8 a.m., Yang's wife, the defendant Xue, seeing that Yang had not returned home with the money, gathered several people and went to Wang's residence. Upon seeing Wang, Xue immediately assaulted him. Witnessing this, Yang and the gathered individuals pressured Wang to pay, forcibly taking Wang out of his residence and continuing to threaten and assault him. After being beaten, Wang contacted his family to transfer 20,000 yuan, with 15,000 yuan being transferred to the accounts of Yang and Xue, respectively. Subsequently, Wang withdrew the remaining 5,000 yuan from the bank and handed the cash to individuals assembled by Xue who controlled his withdrawal, after which Wang left. The evidence veri", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in March 2015, defendants Liang and Li, in a rented apartment, Room 306, opposite Fuyuan Huating, Dexing Road, Nan'an Street, a certain district of a certain city, repeatedly accommodated drug users Lu (born November 16, 1998), Su, and Lu A for drug consumption. Around midnight on March 29, 2015, defendants Liang and Li allowed Lu and Lu A to consume ketamine (commonly known as \"K powder\") in the aforementioned rented apartment. Subsequently, the police apprehended defendants Liang and Li and seized five packets of suspected drugs in the said apartment, along with a homemade drug use device and two mobile phones. The police then sent the five packets of suspected drugs for examination by relevant departments while the other seized items were transferred with the case. According to the appraisal by the Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center of a certain city in Guangdong Province, the five packets of suspected drugs found at the scene had a net weight of 3.23 grams and contained Methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Li during the trial. Additional evidence includes a homemade drug use device, household registration materials, records of the arrest, search transcripts, seizure list, transfer list with case, housing rental contract, statements, receipts, urine collection supervision form, administrative penalty decision, identification transcripts, identification photos, on-site survey records, site drawings, photos, drug testing reports, testimonies from witnesses Lu and Lu, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liang and Li, as well as audiovisual materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that from the end of November 2012 to January 30, 2013, the defendant Xie successively opened a casino in a chess and card room operated by himself in a certain village of Xinqi Street in this district, an idle house of Ming in a different village, and other locations, gathering people to gamble by playing \"hard Pai Gow.\" Typically, the casino operated one session daily, earning an illegal profit of over 30,000 yuan. Defendant Xie was responsible for providing the gambling venue, gambling tools, and recruiting gamblers to collect profits. Defendant Han was responsible for keeping watch for the casino, earning a daily wage of 100 yuan, accumulating illegal earnings of 6,000 yuan. On January 30, 2013, police officers acted on a tip-off and cracked down on the casino, apprehending defendant Xie, Han, and nine other gambling-related individuals on the spot, and seizing gambling funds totaling 13,265 yuan and one set of hard Pai Gow gambling tools. Additionally, it has been found that after the incident, defendants Xie and Han have respectively refunded their illegal gains of 24,000 yuan and 6,000 yuan to this court. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Xie and Han during the court hearings and are sufficiently corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wan A, Wan B, Yu, Sun, Mei, Xu A, Deng, Chen, Tang, Xu B, inspection records, arrest process records, identification records, list of seized items, mobile phone text message images, household registration certificates, and other evidence.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Longwan District, a certain city, charged: At around 1:00 am on April 29, 2014, the defendant Zhang, believing that the victim Ye had taken his girlfriend, sought to retaliate against Ye. He called upon the defendants Wang, Yuan, and others named Yang and Shen, instructing them to bring knives. The four of them saw Ye on a bridge near Xingyuan Road in Zhuangyuan Street, Longwan District, a certain city, and proceeded to assault him. Defendants Zhang and Wang wielded knives and slashed at Ye multiple times, while defendants Yuan, Yang, and Shen punched and kicked Ye, resulting in multiple lacerations and bruises on Ye's body. An evaluation determined that Ye had multiple external injuries with a total surface wound length of 20.2 cm and ruptures of the extensor tendons of the right 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th fingers, with the injuries reaching the level of minor injury grade two. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence for the above accusations.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that from July 22 to July 25, 2013, the defendants Chen, Xie, and Lin, after prior discussion, collaborated to set up a makeshift shed on a vacant lot next to the station in Xinzhi Village, a town in a certain county. Inside the shed, they placed 30 gaming machines for others to gamble on. On July 25, 2013, the Public Security Bureau of the county seized 30 gaming machines and illegal earnings of 376 yuan. Upon examination, 24 of these machines were identified as gambling machines. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen, Xie, and Lin during the court trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Huang and Cai, synchronized audio and video recordings, video surveillance, inspection records, identification records, a list of confiscated items, the opinion certificate on electronic gaming facilities and equipment, proof of household registration, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charged that in March 2013, the county government launched a tractor scrappage compensation program. Any organization or individual owning a tractor engaged in agricultural production and operation in the county, after registration with the county's agricultural machinery department, passing the annual safety technical inspection, and completing scrappage recycling procedures as required, was eligible to apply for economic compensation for scrappage. The agricultural machinery department of a township within the county designated the scrap recycling station operated by the defendant Liu to dismantle and recycle tractors that had applied for scrappage within the township. In August 2013, the defendants Yuan and Liu conspired to take advantage of two tractors, which had applied for scrappage economic compensation and were parked at the scrap recycling station operated by Liu, to repeatedly apply for tractor scrappage economic compensation from the township government, thus defrauding the compensation funds. On August 15 of the same year, the defendant Yuan asked Lu for help on the grounds that the two tractors owned by the defendant Liu could not apply for scrappage economic compensation because Liu was a non-local, and Lu agreed. Subsequently, the defendant Yuan led Lu to handle the relevant application procedures and applied for compensation funds of RMB 6,000 from the township government in Lu's name. On September 19, 2014, the defendant Yuan refunded RMB 6,000 to the \"581\" Integrity Special Account set up by the Discipline Inspection Committee of the county. On November 10, 2014, after receiving a phone notification from the county public security bureau, the defendant Yuan voluntarily went to the bureau to accept investigation and truthfully confessed his crime. After coming to the case, the defendant Liu truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Yuan and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wu and Lu, documents from the county's Agricultural Mechanization Management Bureau, application materials for the tractor scrappage compensation funds, copies of bankbooks, certificates, payment slips, case history, and household registration proof, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that between June 3 and June 11, 2014, the defendant Fang provided gambling equipment and venues, such as his old house and the Fang family ancestral hall in a certain village of a certain town, for gamblers to gamble in the form of \"Na Liu Ming.\" He also arranged for people to act as lookouts, manage the corners, and draw images. In the casino, the defendant Fang charged commissions from the dealers, the defendants Cheng and Yu were responsible for managing the corners, while the defendants Dai and Mao were responsible for drawing images. Outside the casino, the defendant Xiang was responsible for being a lookout for the casino. Until the casino was raided by the public security authorities on June 11, 2014, it had illegally profited approximately 31,400 yuan. Among this, the defendant Fang illegally profited about 20,000 yuan; the defendant Cheng illegally profited about 6,000 yuan; the defendant Yu illegally profited about 3,000 yuan; the defendant Dai illegally profited about 2,000 yuan; the defendant Xiang illegally profited about 600 yuan; and the defendant Mao illegally profited about 400 yuan. After the incident, the defendants Cheng, Dai, Xiang, and Mao voluntarily surrendered to the Xiaoxiong police station. On June 26, 2014, the defendant Fang had already turned in 10,000 yuan of illegal profits. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including witness testimony, defendants' confessions, and relevant documentary evidence.", "label": {"Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the indictment by a certain Banner People's Procuratorate, in January 2019, Qiao (dealt with in a separate case) set traps twice in a certain forested area to capture and kill 2 wild elk. After killing them, he transported the carcasses to a town in a certain Banner and contacted the defendant Wang. Qiao sold the meat of the killed wild elk to the defendant Wang. After contacting the defendant Song about selling the elk meat, Wang agreed to buy it. Wang then arranged with Qiao for a transaction location. Defendant Song drove to the west gate of the South Market in the town designated by Wang to wait for the transaction. Wang bought the elk hind legs, pre-packaged in fiber bags by Qiao, for 800 yuan, and gave them to Song. According to the price appraisal issued by the Banner Development and Reform Commission, the price of the wild elk hind legs acquired by defendants Song and Wang was 12,000 yuan.", "label": {"Song": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accused that on the evening of February 6, 2021, the defendant Chang proposed stealing electric bicycle batteries for personal use, to which the defendant Mi agreed. At around 3 a.m. on February 7, 2021, Chang, together with Mi, drove a white car with license plate number *** to the side of Peihua Road, north of Ningxia Construction Vocational and Technical College in a certain district. Using tools such as crowbars and hammers, they pried open two yellow Meituan shared electric bicycles parked by the roadside and stole two electric bicycle batteries before driving away from the scene. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of a certain district, the stolen Meituan shared electric bicycle batteries were valued at 2,460 yuan. After the incident, the stolen electric bicycle batteries were recovered and returned. The relatives of the defendant Chang compensated the victim unit, Beijing Mobike Technology Co., Ltd., for all the economic losses of the electric bicycles, totaling 7,000 yuan. The victim unit issued a letter of understanding suggesting leniency for Chang and Mi.", "label": {"Chang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Mi": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On January 31, 2013, the defendant Deng lent a shotgun, which had been left at his home by Li (deceased), a resident of a certain village in a certain county, in 1997, to the defendant Zhou for use. After being reported by someone, police officers from the police station of Mengusi Town in the county seized the gun at Zhou's home. According to the trace evidence identification by the Shiyan City Public Security Judicial Authentication Center, and in accordance with the \"Regulations on the Performance Identification of Guns and Ammunition Involved in Cases by Public Security Organs\" and the \"Inspection Methods for Gun Performance IFSC08-02-01-2011\", the inspected gun uses gunpowder as the propellant to fire projectiles and has lethal power. The facts of the above accusation are also undisputed by the defendants Zhou and Deng during the trial process. Furthermore, the testimonies of witnesses Zhu, Wu A, Wu B, and others, the list of seized items, the gun and ammunition examination report, criminal photographs, site diagrams, as well as the confessions and defense statements of the defendants Zhou and Deng, serve as evidence sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Surveillance"], "Deng": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that at about 4 a.m. on November 17, 2015, the defendants He and Xie had an altercation and scuffle with the victim, Zhang, over a minor issue in the corridor on the second floor of the GreenTree Inn Hotel in the Chengdong Street of Gutian County. During the incident, He stabbed Zhang in the abdomen with a dagger, and Xie struck Zhang with a stick, resulting in the full-thickness rupture of Zhang's jejunum. According to the assessment, Zhang's injuries were classified as second-degree serious injuries. After the incident, He and Xie have compensated Zhang with 40,000 RMB (the currency below is the same) for medical expenses. After the incident, He and Xie voluntarily turned themselves in. The prosecution has submitted relevant evidence to this court to support the charges.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 3 a.m. on January 27, 2016, on the third floor of Candy KTV in Kuiwen District, Weifang City, the defendants Zhang, Dou, and Yan, without reason, assaulted Chen, Li, and others who were singing there. Forensic identification by the public security authorities determined that the injuries of Chen and Li constituted minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Zhang, Dou, and Yan reached a settlement agreement with the victims Chen and Li, and the three defendants compensated the two victims a total of 45,000 yuan for their economic losses. The two victims expressed forgiveness towards the three defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang, Dou, and Yan during the court hearing and were corroborated by documentary evidence such as personal information, phone inquiry records, arrest details, letters of understanding, and receipts; testimonies from witnesses Shan and Zhou; statements from the victims Chen and Li; forensic opinions from the Criminal Science and Technology Office of Kuiwen Branch of Weifang Public Security Bureau (Weifang Public [Kui] Forensic [Injury] No. 42, 45, 2016 Forensic Medical Human Injury Assessment Report); and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Dou": ["Imprisonment"], "Yan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At approximately 2 a.m. on October 22, 2014, the defendants Chen and Wang went to the Orchid Community on Guizhu Road in a certain district and stole a Xunlong-brand two-wheel motorcycle valued at 3,250 yuan, which Xu had parked beside a garbage area in the Orchid Community. The stolen motorcycle has been recovered and returned to the owner. Additionally, it was found that the police seized a yellow and black rubber-handled flathead screwdriver at the scene of the arrest, which is currently held at the Sunshine Police Station of the Huaxi Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The aforementioned facts are not contested by the defendants Chen and Wang during the court hearing, and are corroborated by evidence, including the household registration certificates of the two defendants, their confessions to the investigating agency, the statement of the owner Xu, the written account of the arrest by the police of the Sunshine Police Station of the Huaxi Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, site identification records and photos, the seizure warrant, inventory of seized items and photos, the inventory of returned items, identification records and photos, and the valuation conclusion for the involved items by the Pricing Certification Center of a certain district of the city, Document No. 219 (2014). This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 4 AM on March 5, 2019, Fu and Chen1 (already sentenced) had a dispute over the phone due to a personal issue with Li and arranged to meet for a fight. Chen1 invited Wang (already sentenced) and others to help, and Wang invited the defendant, Luo, who in turn invited the defendant, Liu. Liu then invited \"Hailong,\" \"Haonan,\" and others to assist. Fu invited Ma and Chen2 to assist, and subsequently, both parties engaged in a fight at the entrance of \"Night Bar.\" During the altercation, Liu injured Chen2 with a vegetable knife, after which both parties left the scene. An assessment determined that the injury to Chen2's left shoulder was minor. It was also established that the defendant, Luo, voluntarily surrendered to the Zhongshu Police Station of the Renhuai Public Security Bureau on June 8, 2019, and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The above facts are corroborated by evidence including the police report registration form, acceptance registration form, case filing decision, household registration certificate, report of arrival, inspection records, statements of circumstances, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses of the defendants, on-site investigation transcript, identification transcript, and appraisal opinion. Additionally, the two defendants raised no objections during the court trial at this institution, and this court confirms these facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that in the early morning of May 23, 2016, defendants Li and Guo conspired to go to Room 201, Building 38, Taoyuan Road, Yuelin Street, in a certain city. Defendant Guo served as a lookout outside while defendant Li used a card to open the door and enter the premises, stealing 1200 yuan in cash placed by the victim, Jin, on the bedside table and in the wallet. On May 24, 2016, at approximately 3:00 PM, the police arrested defendants Li and Guo inside Room 101, No. 134, Sunjia, Minghua Village, Yuelin Street, in the same city, based on clues. After being brought to justice, 800 yuan of the stolen cash was recovered and returned to the victim, and defendant Guo has compensated the victim for the remaining economic loss. These facts were not disputed by defendants Li and Guo during the trial of the case and are substantiated by the testimony of the witness Zhang, the statement of the victim Jin, the on-site identification records and photographs, the site inspection and examination records, site diagrams and photographs, the seizure decision, the list of seized and returned items, the criminal judgment, the release certificate, the video investigation report, personal information, and the details of the arrest, all of which are sufficient to support the findings. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the two defendants, the prosecution agency suggests sentencing defendant Li to eight to ten months of imprisonment with a fine and sentencing defendant Guo to four to five months of detention, with probation, and a fine.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from April to December 2013, the defendant Gong, taking advantage of his position at a certain department of a center in a certain city, along with defendants Li and Wang (handled in another case), colluded and embezzled a total of 45,000 yuan in national small guarantee loan interest subsidies through methods such as falsifying relevant application materials. After the crime was discovered, the embezzled funds received by the defendants were all recovered. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by the two defendants and Gong's defense counsel during the court proceedings, and are corroborated by documentary evidence including: residential registration proof, certification from a certain bureau of a certain city, employment contract from a provincial public institution, personnel hiring registration form for public institutions, document from a central department of a certain city on \"Internal Department Setup and Responsibilities,\" notifications from the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of a certain city, the Finance Bureau of a certain city, the branch of the People's Bank of China in a certain city regarding the issuance of the \"Interim Measures for Small Guarantee Loans for Entrepreneurs in a Certain City,\" the process for handling small guarantee loan interest subsidies, proof materials, materials for small guarantee loan application forms of a certain city, 2013 subsidy disbursement forms for small guarantee loans, reports and accounting vouchers from a certain city's center regarding the application for disbursement, expansion of the unemployment insurance fund, trial funds for expense scope, detailed list of embezzlement in partnership, vouchers for the recovery of embezzled funds, receipts, photographs of embezzled funds, explanation of case sources, testimonies from witnesses such as Xu, and appraisal reports from the People's Procuratorate of a certain city, which are sufficient to conclude.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: During the COVID-19 epidemic, the defendant Gui, in collaboration with the defendant Yang, sought illegal profits. Through the introduction of Wang (handled in another case), they ordered protective materials from a production factory in a certain location, and despite being aware that the factory was producing substandard \"three no\" 84 disinfectant, they purchased the low-quality 84 disinfectant a second time and sold it for profit. On January 26, 2020, defendants Gui and Yang purchased 1,800 barrels of 5-kilogram \"Ji Brand\" 84 disinfectant and several bottles of 500ml \"Tongjianle Brand\" 84 disinfectant from Zhang B and Zhang A (both handled in another case) in a certain city, through Wang A. Among them: (1) 1,800 barrels of the 5-kilogram 84 disinfectant were sold to Liu at 23 yuan per barrel, collecting payment of 41,400 yuan; (2) 600 bottles of 500ml \"Tongjianle Brand\" 84 disinfectant were sold to the Shuyuan Street Office at 8 yuan per bottle, with 4,800 yuan in payment yet to be collected due to the epidemic. On January 30, 2020, defendants Gui and Yang again acquired 3,070 barrels of 10-kilogram \"Ji Brand\" 84 disinfectant of substandard quality from Zhang 2 and Zhang 3 through Wang. Among them: (1) they sold 2,380 barrels to Liu at 46 yuan per barrel, collecting payment of 112,410 yuan; (2) they sold 200 barrels to the Xiaogang Town Government at 52 yuan per barrel, collecting payment of 10,400 yuan; (3) they sold 300 barrels to Guan at approximately 41 yuan per barrel, collecting payment of 12,400 yuan; (4) they sold 50 barrels to a person from Yunmeng at 46 yuan per barrel, collecting payment of 2,300 yuan. According to tests by Hubei Pristine Standard Technical Services Co., the first batch of 84 disinfectant had an active chlorine content of 2.41%; tests by the Xiaochang County Center for Disease Control showed that the second batch had an active chlorine content of 3.43%, both of which were non-compliant products.", "label": {"Gui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on May 1, 2019, defendants Tao, Xia, and Zhou were involved in a conflict with security guard Fan over parking fees at No. XX, Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, this city, in front of Gate XX of the Nanjing XXXX Center. The three of them assaulted Fan, causing him minor injuries.", "label": {"Tao": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: In September 2014, the defendants Zhang and Kang twice went to the home of Wang Bing in a certain village of a certain township in a certain city to commit theft, stealing a motor, iron molds, and other items with a total value of 407 yuan. After selling the stolen goods, they squandered the proceeds. On September 19, 2014, the two defendants were caught by the public security authorities while attempting to commit theft again at Wang Bing's home. Following the incident, the stolen items were recovered. To support the above charges, the People's Procuratorate of a certain city provided the confessions of defendants Zhang and Kang, the statement of the victim Wang Bing, testimonies from witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and others, a valuation report of the involved assets, and the defendants' household registration certificates, among relevant evidence. It was also asserted that the actions of defendants Zhang and Kang constituted crime X, calling for legal sentencing. The two defendants have no objections to the criminal facts and applicable law charged by the prosecution. The trial concluded the following facts: On a day in early September 2014, defendants Zhang and Kang stole a motor from Wang Bing's home in a certain village of a certain township in a certain city, valued at 200 yuan according to the appraisal. The defendants sold the stolen goods to a recycling station operated by Liu, obtaining 120 yuan, which they squandered. On September 15, 2014, defendants Zhang and Kang stole a bag of iron molds and an iron shelf from Wang Bing's home, valued at 207 yuan according to the appraisal. The defendants sold the stolen goods to a recycling station operated by Liu, obtaining 150 yuan, which they squandered. On September 19, 2014, defendants Zhang and Kang were apprehended by public security officers while attempting to commit theft again at Wang Bing's home. After the incident, the stolen items were recovered. The facts above are confirmed by defendants Zhang and Kang in court without objection, supplemented by their confessions given to the public security authorities, Wang Bing's statement, testimonies by witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Liu, Han, the valuation report of the involved assets, lists of seized and returned items by the public security authorities, a criminal judgment by the Tianjin Hexi District People's Court, and the household information of the two defendants, sufficiently substantiated.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Kang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that on the night of February 14, 2020, the defendants Teng and Zhao, after premeditation, went to the vicinity of the Journey to the West Palace at Jiuli Subdistrict, Gulou District, Xuzhou City. Defendant Teng used a crowbar to open the victim Zhang's door, after which the two entered the house together to commit theft. They stole four bottles of liquor, two commemorative albums, a safe, a jade pumpkin, a Maitreya Buddha pendant, a gourd-shaped pendant, a piece of jade, a red circular pendant, two red bracelets, and other items. According to the appraisal, the stolen items were valued at a total of 640 yuan. On February 18, 2020, the defendants Teng and Zhao were arrested by the public security authorities. It was further found that two bottles of the stolen liquor, two commemorative albums, a safe, a jade pumpkin (glass material), a Maitreya Buddha pendant (jade material), a gourd-shaped pendant (agate material), a piece of jade (jade material), a red circular pendant (glass material), and two red bracelets (glass material) have all been recovered and returned to the victim. The two defendants have obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Teng and Zhao during the trial, and there are also statements from the victim Zhang; testimony from the witness Zhao; search warrant, search record, seizure decision, seizure record, seizure list and photos, return list; identification records and photos; the testing report from the Provincial Gold and Jewelry Testing Co., Ltd., price certification conclusion from the Gulou District Price Certification Center in Xuzhou City, proof; electronic evidence inspection record, extracted evidence list and photos; electronic data inspection record and disc, on-site inspection record; case registration form, case initiation decision, investigation and detection process and arrival process, explanation of circumstances, criminal judgment, release certificate, letter of understanding, and the defendants' household registration certificate and other evidence to prove, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Teng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that between July and September 2015, the defendants Liu and Wu, in order to obtain illegal profits, distributed obscene cards in Jiaxing City's Home Inn, Jinjiang Inn, and other hotels. These cards, distributed by defendant Wu, featured photos of scantily clad women and phrases like \"Innocent Schoolgirl,\" \"Housewife,\" \"Youthful Girl,\" \"High-end Model\" along with contact numbers. Defendant Liu printed these obscene cards, answered calls from clients, negotiated projects and prices, and then notified the prostitute Yuan to engage in prostitution activities at the clients' hotels. The details are as follows:\n\n1. On the night of July 28, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Lu in room 8405 at Jiaxing City Jinjiang Inn (Train Station Branch) for prostitution activities.\n2. In the early hours of August 9, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Du in room 512 at Jiaxing City Baile Business Hotel for prostitution activities.\n3. On the night of September 9, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Huang in room 1312 at Home Inn Management Co., Jianguo Road Branch for prostitution activities.\n4. In the early hours of September 13, 2015, they introduced the prostitute Yuan to Xuan in room 329 at Jiaxing City Heidelberg Fashion Hotel for prostitution activities.\n\nAfter the incident, the police seized 5,194 obscene cards from the rented residence of defendants Liu and Wu. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendants Liu and Wu truthfully confessed to the main criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Wu during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the testimony of witnesses Yuan, Lu, Du, Huang, Xuan, Zhang, Chen, and Li, as well as the statements of defendants Liu and Wu during the investigation stage. Additional evidence includes search records and photos, a list of seized items, accommodation registration forms, surveillance videos and explanations, identification records and photos, detailed inquiries of mobile phone bills, an administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates, case arrival processes, among others, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: 1. On May 18, 2015, around 14:00, the defendant Yang, in collaboration with Liang (Yi), went to the entrance of the Big Banyan Tree Scenic Area in a certain town of the county with the intent to steal. They subsequently stole a wallet containing 240 yuan in cash, bank cards, identification documents, and other items from the backpack carried by the victim, You. 2. On August 31, 2015, around 13:00, the defendant Yang went to the Foreign Affairs Pier in Yangshuo Town of the county and stole a wallet containing 341.1 yuan in cash, bank cards, and other items from the victim, Guo. 3. On April 30, 2016, around 13:00, the defendants Yang, Xu, and Zheng (dealt with in a separate case) went to the section of Pantao Road Farmers' Market entrance in Yangshuo Town of the county and stole an iPhone 6 worth 3,330 yuan from the victim, Liang (Jia).", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 5 p.m. on July 27, 2013, the defendants Yang, Hu, and Wu were very dissatisfied with Mr. Li, the person in charge of the Xianghu Long Island Apartment Project in Qixing Town, Nanhu District, who delayed paying wages of more than 12,000 yuan. In response, they used hammers to smash 26 gourd-shaped railings and 3 railing handrails outside Villa No. * of the Xianghu Long Island Apartment. According to appraisal, the value of the damaged property was 9,721 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang, Hu, and Wu during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of the victim, Mr. Li, witness testimony from Mr. Wen, site records, decisions on evidence preservation, lists, and photos, on-site investigation materials, explanatory notes, letter of understanding, price appraisal conclusion, household registration information, and details of their apprehension.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Detention"], "Wu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that the \"Jinsha Entertainment\" website was operating without the permission of any state department. It relied on the official lottery categories, results, and play methods, and independently operated lottery games such as 3D Welfare Lottery, Arrangement 3, and various local lotteries. The prize money of the winning results was higher than that of the official state lottery. In October 2014, Yan, who has already been sentenced, sought illegal profits by obtaining qualifications as the general agent and website administrator for a certain province and city on the \"Jinsha Entertainment\" website, obtaining a commission of 6% to 11% on the bet amount under his agency. Subsequently, Yan approached Huang and Tao to discuss jointly running the \"illegal lottery\" website, and Huang and Tao agreed. The three agreed that Yan and Huang would be responsible for placing bets on the \"illegal lottery\" website, while Tao would be responsible for answering phone calls from people purchasing \"illegal lottery\" tickets, recording the numbers, amounts, and sums of the bets. The three used a residence located at Unit 4, 3rd Floor, No. 4, Building 1, Fumin Community, Mingshan District, in a certain city as the place for selling \"illegal lottery\" tickets and began selling \"illegal lottery\" tickets in a certain city. By the time the case was uncovered, Yan, Huang, and Tao had sold \"illegal lottery\" tickets totaling over 1.24 million yuan and had illegally profited over 30,000 yuan. During the investigation, defendants Huang and Tao voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau in a certain province and city on April 25, 2016, and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts after arriving. The prosecuting authority provided corresponding evidence for the facts charged.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It was further found that on December 22, 2011, the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau of a certain city inspected the actual business location of the defendant unit Yixin Company at No. 58, Jinji Road, Xiaogang Street, Beilun District, a certain city, and seized infringing products that had not been sold. On May 3, 2012, the case was transferred to the Economic Crime Investigation Unit of the Beilun Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the same city. After being notified by the police handling the case by phone, defendant Pan voluntarily surrendered on May 3, 2012, and defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered on May 11 of the same year, both truthfully confessing to the criminal facts. After the incident, the defendant unit Yixin Company has paid a fine of 60,000 yuan to the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau and returned illegal gains of 31,340 yuan to this court. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Wang A, the litigation representative of the defendant unit Yixin Company, and defendants Pan and Wang during the trial, and were proven by the transfer opinion letter and materials of the suspected criminal case from the Beilun Branch of the Industry and Commerce Bureau, on-site records, photos of the infringing products and anti-counterfeiting labels involved in the case, Yixin Company's statistics on operating fake Great Wall lubricating oil and inventory summary form, trademark registration certificate, approval certificate for trademark transfer, approval certificate for renewal registration, notice on recognizing the \"Great Wall\" trademark as a well-known trademark, on-site identification certificate, statement record of the arrest process, basic information of permanent residents, industry and commerce registration inquiry information, special receipt for collection of fines and confiscation payments from a certain province, settlement receipt and other evidence sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in the early hours of February 15, 2015, defendants Li and Hou, along with six or seven others, left the \"Jinsha Entertainment Club\" in a certain county after consuming services there and attempted to take a taxi downstairs. As the taxi driver, He, deemed the vehicle overloaded and refused to start the car, Li and Hou got into an altercation with the driver, He. During this period, Li, Hou, and others assaulted the driver, He, resulting in He's hospitalization due to injuries. According to the evidence identification by the Nanchong City Public Security Bureau, He sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage, classified as minor injury level two. After the incident, defendants Li and Hou compensated the victim, He, and received his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Hou during the trial proceedings. Additionally, these are supported by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, incident statement, on-site inspection record, Nanchong City Public Security Bureau physical evidence appraisal document, letter of understanding, receipts, household registration information of the defendants, identification record, testimonies from witnesses Wu and Jing, the victim He's statement, and the confessions of defendants Li and Hou, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Hou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After a summary trial in criminal proceedings, it was found that on June 1, 2017, the defendants Ma and Tao encountered a fellow villager from the same village, Liu, at a noodle shop in a certain town of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province. The two falsely claimed that they could help Liu find a job but said that employment procedures were necessary. They used Liu's ID card and bank card to process installment loans for two mobile phones, with the monthly loan payments to be handled by Ma and Tao. Subsequently, through the contact and introduction of Ma2, Ma and Tao took Liu to the Woda Communications mobile phone store in a trade development district of a certain town in a certain district. Liu processed the installment loan procedures for two iPhone 7s, agreeing to repay 359.67 yuan per month for 15 months and 366 yuan per month for 18 months, respectively. After the successful processing, the total loan amount for the two phones was 8,000 yuan. The defendant Ma agreed with the phone store owner, Ma2, and others that after deducting commissions and other fees from the loan amount, Ma2 would transfer 4,720 yuan to Tao via WeChat, after which Ma, Tao, and others squandered the money. After the incident, the defendants Ma, Tao, and Ma2 compensated the victim for the loss, totaling 9,000 yuan, and gained the victim's understanding. The evidence substantiating the aforementioned criminal facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence such as the case source, the process of getting the defendants to appear in court, and the compensation agreement. 2. Testimonies from witnesses such as Liu2, Ma1, and others. 3. Statement from the victim Liu. 4. Confessions and defenses by the defendants. 5. Identification records.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On December 15, 2016, this Court issued Civil Judgment No. (2016) Su 0707 Min Chu 7069, adjudicating that defendants Zhang and He, a married couple, should pay from the 1.61 million yuan death compensation of their son, Zhang C, the amounts of 271,280 yuan to Xiao, 381,280 yuan to Zhang A, and 381,280 yuan to Zhang B, with Zhang A's and Zhang B's portions to be held in custody by Xiao. After the judgment came into effect, defendants Zhang and He did not fulfill the legal obligations determined by the judgment. On June 15, 2017, this Court served an enforcement notice and a notice to declare property within a time limit to Zhang and He. During this period, the defendants Zhang and He transferred 1 million yuan to another person's bank card, withdrew it in cash to conceal it, and refused to comply with the obligations determined by the judgment. After the incident, defendants Zhang and He reached a settlement with the applicant for enforcement. After coming to light, defendants Zhang and He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts and pleaded guilty.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: On the morning of July 8, 2016, at approximately 3 a.m., the defendants Chen and Liu conspired and drove a white Chery car with the license plate Su G××××× to the Guanxi Resettlement Community in the port industry area of a certain county. There, they pried off five batteries from a red electric tricycle parked on the north side of the community, belonging to the victim, Sun. According to the price certification center of the county, the price of the five Yugang 6-DG-200 batteries was appraised at 2,400 yuan.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain locality charged that on May 31, 2014, at around 8 a.m., the defendants Zhang and Hao, in collusion with Xia (handled in a separate case) and others, after prior discussion, went to the Jiangshu Village Market in Qianqing Town, Keqiao District, Shaoxing City, and stole a wallet belonging to Zhang A, which was placed in the basket of an electric scooter. The wallet contained 4,100 yuan in cash and a \"Samsung\" mobile phone. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 1,045 yuan. The defendants Zhang and Hao did not dispute these facts during the court proceedings, and these facts were corroborated by evidence such as the mobile phone invoice, the arrest record, the criminal judgment document, Xia's confession, Zhang A's statement, the price appraisal report, the identification transcripts by Zhang and Hao, and surveillance video, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 20:00 on October 30, 2013, the defendant Zheng and the victim Liu Moujia had a dispute over billiard scoring at the billiard club on the fourth floor of the Xiangying Hotel in Nanzhuang Town, Chancheng District, Foshan City. Subsequently, the defendant Zheng, along with defendant Tu and Wang Moumou and \"Qiang Moumou\" (both handled in separate cases), used billiard cues and other tools to assault the victims Liu Moujia, Liu Mouyi, and Luo Mou in the billiard room. During this time, the defendant Zheng injured the left thigh of the victim Liu Moujia with a spring knife. According to forensic identification, the injuries to victims Liu Moujia and Liu Mouyi were classified as minor injuries, grade two. After the incident, the family of the defendant Tu apologized to the three victims and obtained their forgiveness. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zheng and Tu during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements and identification r", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charges: From October 2014 to May 2015, the defendants Huang and Zhou purchased marketing QQ accounts, Haodi software, mobile phones, bank cards, and other items for fraud purposes. They posted fake “escort service” advertisements online via marketing QQ, scamming clients by collecting pre-paid service fees, safety deposits for the escorts, and vehicle insurance fees, amassing a total of over 100,000 RMB. During this period, in the early hours of February 10 of the same year, the victim Yang received the false escort advertisement from the defendants Huang and Zhou while chatting on QQ. The victim Yang subsequently contacted the defendants by phone and agreed on a price for the service. The defendants requested that Yang prepay a service fee of 500 RMB. Yang then transferred 500 RMB to the Agricultural Bank of China account designated by the defendant Huang, using an ATM of the said bank near a square in Liangzhu Street, Yuhang District, in a certain city. Subsequently, the defendants used the pretext of a safety deposit for the escort and requested that Yang transfer an additional 3000 RMB, promising the return of the deposit after the service. Yang transferred 3000 RMB to the same account. The defendants then demanded 5000 RMB for vehicle insurance, again promising a refund upon completion of the service, which Yang transferred to the same account. Ultimately, the defendants demanded an additional 3000 RMB for \"lingerie expenses,\" at which point Yang realized he was being scammed and did not transfer more money. On May 19 of the same year, the police searched the residence of defendants Huang and Zhou, located in a certain group, certain village, certain town, certain city, and certain province, where they found nine mobile phones, ten bank cards, and one ASUS laptop (which had marketing QQ and Haodi software installed). The evidence for the charges includes household registration proof, bank transfer vouchers, a list of seized items with photos, bank transaction records, statements from the victim Yang, and confessions and defenses from the defendants Huang and Zhou, as well as ATM withdrawal surveillance footage (CD 1).", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges: In early December 2013, the defendant Li rented a property from Wang in Mopanzhang Street in our county to operate a chess and card club. Later, in early January 2014, Li placed a gambling machine (commonly known as a \"little fish machine\") that allowed six people to gamble simultaneously in the club. During the operation, Li had his daughter-in-law, the defendant Wang, responsible for business management. By January 21, 2014, when the police discovered the operation, they had illegally gained over 8,000 yuan. It was further discovered that defendant Wang surrendered to the Xinqiao Police Station of Guzhen County Public Security Bureau on January 24, 2014. Defendants Li and Wang returned the illegal gains of 8,000 yuan to the public security agency. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony of witnesses such as Chen and others, site inspection records, site drawings, site photos produced by the Guzhen County Public Security Bureau, household registration proofs, the process of the incident and capture, the General Payment Certificate for Non-Tax Revenue of Anhui Provincial Government, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of March 30, 2016, the defendants Quan and Qian, in collaboration with \"a certain individual\" (handled in a separate case), conspired and went to *** Hotel on Yucai Road, Jiangnan Village, a town in a certain city. They used a method where Quan served as a lookout, Qian as an accomplice, and \"the certain individual\" climbed through a window to commit theft at the hotel. They stole from the victim, Li, one Lenovo G450 laptop valued at 500 RMB, one Apple iPhone 4s valued at 500 RMB, one Lenovo A380e mobile phone valued at 150 RMB, one carton of Hetianxia cigarettes valued at 1,000 RMB, two cartons of Zhonghua (soft pack) cigarettes valued at 1,400 RMB, and two packs of Zhonghua (hard pack) cigarettes valued at 90 RMB. On April 1, 2016, defendants Quan and Qian were apprehended by local police officers. Police seized a Lenovo phone from defendant Qian, which was then returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Quan and Qian during the court proceedings. These facts are supported by documentary evidence such as the \"Capture Report\" by the Municipal Public Security Bureau, seizure warrant, list of seized items, list of returned items, photographic explanations, criminal judgment, criminal records, population information, cigarette price certifications, witness testimony from Luo, statements from the victim Li, identification records and photographs, and price appraisal report, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Quan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at about 15:00 on November 28, 2013, the defendants Hu and Zhang beat the victim Zhou with wooden sticks in the Weiting Subdistrict of the Suzhou Industrial Park, causing minor injuries to his body. After being brought to justice, defendants Hu and Zhang both truthfully confessed to their crimes. The prosecutor read and presented in court the confession records of defendants Hu and Zhang, the statement records of the victim Zhou, the testimony records of witnesses Xie A, Bian, Wang, Xie B, and Pan, identification records, forensic examination report and notes, medical records, the process of arrest, the process of solving the case, the public security administrative penalty decision, household registration data, and other evidence.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yunlong District in a certain city charged: In August 2012, Zhang, due to a contractual dispute with Liu, the manager of a certain engineering machinery company in the city, contacted Pan (already sentenced) through the introduction of Liu, requesting Pan to help him demand the remaining payment of the contract from Liu and promised to give Pan a reward of 20,000 RMB once the matter was accomplished. On the morning of August 7, 2012, Pan assembled defendants Liu, Hu, and others, and went with Zhang to the office of Liu at the aforementioned engineering machinery company near a driving school in the city to demand the remaining contract payment. The dispute between the parties was not resolved, and they left. On the afternoon of August 7, under the influence of alcohol, Pan again gathered defendants Liu, Hu, and others, plotting to use intimidation and beating to resolve the dispute over the unpaid contract balance owed to Zhang by Liu. Around 5 p.m. that day, Pan and defendants Liu, Hu, and others returned to Liu's office, assaulted the victim Liu, and vandalized items in the office, resulting in the victim Liu's right eye orbital medial wall fracture and multiple soft tissue contusions. The damage to some of the office supplies was appraised at a value of 8,858 RMB. On March 18, March 20, and March 26, 2014, defendants Hu and others voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. During the court trial, defendants Liu, Hu, and others raised no objections to the above facts, which are supported by the victim Liu's statement, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Li, Zhang, and Liu, confessions of defendants Liu, Hu, and others, and co-defendant Pan, victim medical records, CT diagnosis reports, injury photos, receipts, crime scene photos, lists of damaged items, household registration certificates, the criminal judgment of the People's Court, labor education decision, price appraisal opinion by the Price Certification Center of Yunlong District, identification records, arrest process, and case-solving process, all sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Li (already convicted) developed the idea of attacking the victim Sun as a form of venting anger because Sun had not repaid a debt. On December 29, 2014, at around 11 PM, Li learned from Ding that Sun was staying at the \"Laurel\" hotel in Zhoujiaba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing. Afterwards, Li invited the defendant He, and the two of them went to the Laurel hotel armed with knives. At the hotel, Li encountered the defendant Peng, who, upon learning of Li's intention to attack, proactively offered to help Li and also invited the defendant Wang and Wei (handled in a separate case) to assist. Li led Peng, He, Wang, Wei, and others into room 3018 of the Laurel hotel, armed with knives. He and Wang blocked the door with knives, while Li, Wei, and Peng injured Sun with their knives. An examination determined that Sun's injuries were classified as second-degree serious injury. The aforementioned facts,", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on the morning of September 20, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Qin drove a small truck with the license plate number W10A3643 to the north street of Hecun Primary School in Hecun Town, Jiangshan City, to sell popcorn. At around 11 p.m. the following day, as the two were packing up to go home, they saw a black Yamaha two-wheeled electric bicycle parked not far away. They then loaded the electric bicycle onto the truck and stole it. That night, Jiang drove the truck to transport the stolen electric bicycle back to his home in a certain place to hide it. An appraisal determined that the electric bicycle was valued at 3,040 RMB.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Fine"], "Qin": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuecheng District in a certain city accused defendants Xiao and Han, stating that starting in 2010, Xiao and Han conspired together, with defendant Han responsible for sourcing counterfeit \"Zhang\" trademark sword heads from others, and defendant Xiao responsible for selling these sword heads at a price of approximately 35 RMB per set, with total sales amounting to over 89,000 RMB. On May 6, 2013, defendant Xiao was apprehended by public security authorities in Room 601, Unit 1, Building 13, Lidou Huayuan, Baojiang New District of a certain city; on May 23 of the same month, defendant Han was apprehended by public security authorities at Xianhui Machinery Textile Factory, 388 Sujiayuan, Lianghui Town, a certain city in a certain province. During the trial of this case, defendants Xiao and Han each voluntarily paid 4,000 RMB to the court. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Xiao and Han during the trial, and were corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Shen, Chen, Jiang, Wang, etc., as well as appraisal reports, business licenses, trademark registration certificates, the case investigation conclusion report from Huishan of Wuxi Administration for Industry and Commerce, bills, search records, lists of seized and transferred items, statements of arrest process, and household registration certificates, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts. The criminal judgment No. 335 (2005) issued by Changning District People’s Court and the certificate of release upon completion of sentence demonstrated defendant Xiao's criminal record.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: 1. On the evening of July 11, 2013, the defendants Wang and Liu conspired to go to a mining area in a certain city. Liu acted as a lookout while Wang used a pre-prepared screwdriver to pry open and steal a three-wheeler of the Wuxing brand, which was 85% new and valued at 14,968 RMB, belonging to the victim Zhao, which was parked near Building No. 2 in Shaliping. They later sold it for 5,000 RMB in a certain city of a certain place, and the illicit gains were shared and squandered by the two defendants. 2. On the evening of July 16, 2013, defendant Liu drove a black Hyundai car with the license plate Jin C×××××, accompanied by defendant Wang, to a certain village. Liu acted as a lookout inside the car while Wang used a pre-prepared homemade T-shaped tool to pry open and steal a three-wheeler of the Wuzheng brand, which was 80% new and valued at 18,400 RMB, belonging to the victim Chen, which was parked in front of the Zuoquan County Fireworks Company. They later sold it for 5,000 RMB in a certain city of a certain place, and the illicit gains were shared and squandered by the two defendants. In summary, defendants Wang and Liu committed theft twice, with the total value of the stolen goods amounting to 33,368 RMB. After the incident, the families of defendants Wang and Liu have provided civil compensation to the victims. In support of the above charges, the prosecution presents physical evidence, documentary evidence, victim statements, inspection and examination records, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and the defendants' statements.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 3 a.m. on December 28, 2013, the defendants Yin and Wu went to the back of the Lianglihua Leather Goods Factory in Qicaixin Village, Shiling Town, Huadu District, Guangzhou City. Suspecting that the victims Gao and Chen were involved in theft, they proceeded to physically assault the two victims using their fists and feet, resulting in multiple injuries to the victims' bodies. According to a forensic evaluation, the injuries sustained by victim Gao were classified as minor injuries, while the injuries to victim Chen were classified as minor scratches.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Yinchuan City charges that on February 3, 2016, around 12 PM, defendants Bai and Huang went to the Wanke Water Pump Store in the Great Wall Electromechanical Wholesale Market, located on Lijing South Street in a certain district of Yinchuan City. Taking advantage of the victim Yang's unawareness, they stole a Sheng某某 Elder head brand handbag (worth 800 yuan) belonging to him. The bag contained 5,823 yuan in cash and an electricity card. After the incident, the stolen property was recovered and returned.", "label": {"Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses: On August 18, 2015, around 23:00, defendant Yu (nickname \"Fish Scale\") had a dispute with the victim Wu on the phone over a debt issue. Subsequently, they agreed to meet at the county government square in Miaogao Street, Suichang County. Around 1:00 AM the next day, defendant Yu gathered defendant Bi (nickname \"Little Monk\"), Fu (born on April 23, 1998, handled in a separate case), and Qin (born on May 12, 1999, handled in a separate case) at the intersection of Kaien Road and Qingyun Road in Miaogao Street, Suichang County, to assault the victim Wu. (Among them, Fu used a retractable iron stick to assault Wu, while Yu, Bi, and Qin punched and kicked Wu), causing the victim Wu's rib fracture, head injury, and skin and soft tissue contusions and lacerations on his limbs. According to the forensic identification office of Suichang County Public Security Bureau, Wu's bodily injury was assessed as minor injury level two. On August 27, 2015, defendant Yu voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. On August 28, 2015, defendant Bi voluntarily surrendered to the public security organ and truthfully confessed the facts of his crime. On November 2, 2015, the families of Yu, Bi, Fu, and Qin compensated victim Wu for all his economic losses, including medical expenses, totaling 70,000 RMB, and on the same day, victim Wu issued an understanding letter, forgiving the actions of Yu, Bi, Fu, and Qin. During the trial, defendants Yu and Bi had no objections to the above facts, which were supported by the testimonies of witnesses Mao and Yan; the statement of victim Wu; the confessions and defenses of defendants Yu and Bi; the confessions and defenses of co-defendants Fu and Qin; hospital records, medical certificates; forensic human injury degree appraisal document No. 31, 2015, and appraisal opinion notice from the Suichang Public Security Bureau; agreement, receipt, understanding letter; site location map; evidence receipt list, surveillance video; case details; case handling explanation; the first transcripts made by defendants Yu and Bi at the public security organ; inquiry records; and household registration certificates of defendants Yu and Bi, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Bi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution's charges, at around 8 a.m. on May 3, 2015, the defendant Du, near the parking shed at the gate of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, used a lock-picking method to steal a Hairei brand TDR31Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H10595, which belonged to the victim Yu. The vehicle was valued at 950 RMB according to an appraisal. On May 26, 2015, at around 9 a.m., the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of the Village Committee of the Nuli Village on a certain street in this district, using the defendant Du's lock-picking method with defendant Deng acting as a lookout, stole a Xinlei brand TDR538Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H24021, which belonged to the victim Zhou. This vehicle was valued at 1,080 RMB according to an appraisal. Then, around 10 a.m. on the same day, the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of Lihong Supermarket of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, using the same method of Du picking the lock and Deng acting as a lookout, stole a Tailg brand TDR832Z electric bicycle with the license plate number H33953, which belonged to the victim Hu. According to an appraisal, this vehicle was valued at 1,150 RMB. On May 30, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the defendant Du, together with the defendant Deng, at the entrance of Lihong Supermarket of Wugang No. 2 Hospital on a certain street in this district, using the same method as before, stole a Shengbaolong brand TDR306Z electric bicycle with the license plate number QB1128, which belonged to the victim Liu, after which they were caught by police officers. The vehicle was valued at 1,200 RMB according to an appraisal. After the incident, the stolen items were all recovered and returned to the victims. In summary, the defendant Du committed theft 4 times, with a total theft value of 4,380 RMB, and the defendant Deng committed theft 3 times, with a total theft value of 3,430 RMB.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charges: On the night of June 19, 2013, the defendant Li accepted a phone invitation from Huang to go with the defendants Sun and Niu to the entrance of Brothers BBQ on Xuehua Road in the Bangshan District to eat BBQ and drink with Huang and the victim Chen. At about 1:25 am on June 20, Sun and Chen got into a dispute due to drinking. Huang and Chen first started hitting Sun, after which Niu and Li joined in, and together with Sun, they fought against Huang and Chen. Li, Sun, and Niu repeatedly hit Chen’s head and body with iron stools, causing injuries to Chen. On July 15, 2013, the Judicial Appraisal Center of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau assessed that the injuries on Chen's facial wounds and head wounds were both minor. On July 16, 2013, the victim Chen reached a reconciliation agreement with the defendant Li, and after receiving a compensation payment of 20,000 yuan from Li, expressed forgiveness for Li's actions. On July 24 of the same year, the victim Chen reached a mediation agreement with the defendants Sun and Niu, and upon receiving a compensation payment of 65,000 yuan from Sun and Niu, expressed forgiveness for their actions. It was also found that on July 15, 2013, Li turned himself in at the Hongye Village Police Station of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his criminal behavior. On July 25, 2013, Niu turned himself in at the Hongye Village Police Station of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his criminal behavior. The aforementioned facts have been confirmed by the defendants Sun, Niu, and Li during the court trial without objection, and are supported by documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, arrest processes, execution notices, certificates of release from the Huaiyuan County Detention Center, hospitalization records, reconciliation agreements, mediation agreements, applications for forgiveness, receipts, forensic identification documents of human injury degrees, photos, and the victim Chen's statements, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in the early hours of December 30, 2014, and January 4, 2015, defendants Lai, Liu, and Guo conspired together and successively traveled to the intersection of Shenshi Avenue and Xiexu Line in a certain town of a certain city, and the following locations: downstairs of Dinsen Chess Club, in front of Dafang Traditional Restaurant on Tianshun Road, by the roadside of No.1 Jianshe Road in Xuxiang Community, in front of Yuefeng Ya Textile at Caojia Jiao in a certain village on Shenshi Avenue, in front of Debang Logistics Store at No.130 Wensheng Road in Shenshi, and in front of Haining Fengde Textile Co., Ltd. They used the method of smashing car side window glass to steal one handbag belonging to the victim Yang (containing 1800 yuan in cash, an ID card, bank cards, and other items), one in-car air purifier belonging to Gu Jia, and 25 yuan in cash from the victim Su, with a total value of 2065 yuan, causing a loss of 680 yuan for the car windows. Additionally, after destroying the car windows of victims Chen, Gu Yi, Xu, Jiang, Dong, Lu, and Mo, causing a loss of 2297 yuan, no valuables were stolen. After the incident, defendant Gu compensated the victims for their losses. The defendants Lai, Liu, and Guo did not dispute these facts during the trial proceedings, and the facts are corroborated by victim statements from Yang, Chen, Gu Yi, and others, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records and photos, price appraisal opinions, vehicle inquiry data, receipts, letters of forgiveness, capture process, criminal judgment documents, proof of release after serving sentence, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, the findings confirmed: 1. On the morning of September 7, 2015, the defendant Ying facilitated Qian’s use of methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") in room 7518 of a Sunday business hotel in a district of this city. 2. On the morning of September 8, 2015, the defendant Ying facilitated Qian’s use of methamphetamine in room 7518 of the same hotel. 3. On the morning of September 11, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated Liu’s use of methamphetamine in room 7518 of the Sunday business hotel. 4. On the evening of September 11, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated the use of methamphetamine by Ying and Liu, one after the other, in room 7518. 5. At noon on September 12, 2015, the defendant Qian facilitated the use of methamphetamine by Ying and Liu in room 7518. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Ying and Qian during the trial. They were verified by the witness testimony of Liu, which was cross-examined in court, the confessions of Ying and Qian during the investigation phase, inspection certificates, inspection records and photos, the decision on evidence preservation, the evidence preservation list, the inventory of confiscated items, the list of retrieved evidence, the check-in registration form, the on-site test report, the records of the urine sample process, household registration information, and the account of how the case was handled, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ying": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou charged that from April 2013, the defendants Wang and Long, without obtaining an \"Internet Cafe Business License,\" operated an internet cafe without authorization in an unlicensed residential building in a certain town of a certain district in the city. They were discovered on November 10 of the same year. According to statistics, from July 1, 2013, to November 10 of the same year, the internet cafe's cash income totaled 50,657.5 RMB. Based on the above facts,", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Long": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 22:00 on July 20, 2014, defendants Li, Sun A, Liu A (already sentenced) stole 47 pieces of raw shrimp (valued at 5904.6 yuan) from the workshop of Rizhao Jiashi Food Co., Ltd. in Donggang District, Rizhao City. During this time, Sun A and Liu A contacted defendants Sun and Liu to meet outside the company's courtyard and transport the stolen raw shrimp away for distribution. At around 03:00 on July 21, 2014, defendants Li, Sun A, and Liu A stole 3 pieces of raw shrimp (valued at 376.9 yuan) and 5 pieces of Ma from the workshop of Rizhao Jiashi Food Co., Ltd. in Donggang District, Rizhao City. The three defendants raised no objections to these facts during the trial, with evidence including household registration certificates, the testimony of witness Xiang, confessions and defenses of the defendants and co-defendants, price appraisal conclusions for the items involved from a certain province, and surveillance video recordings supporting the conviction. After the incident, the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victim unit, with the facts confirmed by the list of seized and returned items. Defendant Li was apprehended and brought to justice on July 21, 2014; defendants Liu and Sun were summoned to appear by the public security bureau via phone on July 21, 2014. After appearing, all three defendants truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The arrest process corroborates these facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses: On September 24, 2015, the victim, Liu Moujia, borrowed 100,000 RMB from a certain city's Investment Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as a certain company). On October 9, 2015, at around 10 p.m., the victim, Liu Moujia, was near Nanyou Building in a certain district of a certain city, preparing to borrow money from another company, when he was seen by an employee of a certain company, Yang Mou. Due to doubts about Liu Moujia's ability to repay, at about 11 p.m. that night, Yang Mou and the defendant Liu found Liu Moujia and demanded that Liu Moujia repay the loan to the company in advance. As Liu Moujia was unable to repay the debt, Liu detained Liu Moujia's car keys and ID card, and arranged for the defendants Li and Wang to be responsible for watching over Liu Moujia at the company, only allowing him to move within the company's premises. Forced by circumstances, Liu Moujia called his friend Kuang Moujun early in the morning of the 10th to come to the company and discuss raising funds to repay the debt, but Kuang Moujun was unable to raise the money. During this period, the victim Liu Moujia repeatedly requested to leave the company but was refused each time. It was not until around 3:30 p.m. on October 11, 2015, that Kuang Moujun, at the request of Liu Moujia, helped to call the police. Later, the police rescued Liu Moujia from Room 301, 3rd floor of a certain center on Dengliang Road in a certain district of a certain city, and arrested the defendants Liu, Li, and Wang.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that around 22:00 on October 12, 2015, defendant Song had an argument with victim Shi at the Crystal Room of the Fire Cicada KTV on Xiangyang North Street, Baoding City, due to trivial matters. Subsequently, defendants Song, Cui, and others engaged in a fight with victims Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu, resulting in injuries to Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu.\n\nAccording to the Baoding City Forensic Appraisal Center:\n1. Shi suffered a 1.5 cm scalp wound, a fracture of the left maxillary tuberosity, and body surface bruises covering an area of more than 15 square centimeters, classified as minor injuries.\n2. Shi had scalp bruising, soft tissue injuries on the torso covering an area of more than 15 square centimeters, and a soft tissue wound on the limb over 1.0 cm, classified as minor injuries.\n3. Liu sustained body surface bruises covering an area of more than 15.0 square centimeters, classified as minor injuries.\n4. Liu suffered soft tissue bruises, and a laceration on the right little finger with a wound length of 2.5 cm, classified as minor injuries.\n\nAdditionally, it was found that the civil part of the case has been settled, with both defendants compensating the four victims a total of 25,000 RMB, receiving the victims’ understanding. The victims also suggested that the court give the defendants lenient punishment.\n\nThe aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Song and Cui during the trial. They are corroborated by the statements of victims Shi, Shi, Liu, and Liu, testimonies of witnesses Di, Feng, and Tian, recognition records and photographs, forensic appraisal reports, and evidence from the arrest and investigation process, which are sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges: 1. On July 23, 2019, the defendant Chen used social software to lure the victim Xing (a university student) to add his WeChat account and defrauded the victim of 11,777.76 RMB under the pretext of participating in a recharge rebate activity. 2. On August 11 of the same year, the defendants Chen and Zhang jointly used the above method to defraud victim Xue (a minor) of 6,500 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Xue with 6,500 RMB and obtained forgiveness. 3. On August 11 of the same year, defendant Zhang used the above method to defraud victim Sang of 3,888 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Sang with 3,888 RMB and obtained forgiveness. 4. On September 4 of the same year, defendant Zhang used the above method to defraud victim Ding1 (a university student) of 4,000 RMB. After the incident, defendant Zhang's relatives compensated victim Ding1 with 4,000 RMB and obtained forgiveness.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 2 a.m. on October 19, 2015, defendants Xu, Tian, Zhou, and He went to the temporary residence of the victim Yuan at No. 163 Wutian Avenue, Baixiang Village, Nanbaiyang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. There, they stole an Apple iPad tablet (appraised value 416 yuan) and an OPPO mobile phone (appraised value 273 yuan). The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Xu, Tian, Zhou, and He during the court trial and are substantiated by the victim Yuan's statement, on-site inspection records and identification records, a list of seized items, a list of returned items, the price appraisal report, explanatory notes, surveillance video, household registration information, and the details of their apprehension, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on September 6, 2013, at approximately 1 a.m., defendant Weng had a verbal altercation with another person over a trivial matter at the Xuangang Restaurant, Shaojiadun Village, Huanzhu Street, in this city. Weng then gathered defendants Deng, Lu, and Tian to seek revenge at the same restaurant in Shaojiadun Village, Huanzhu Street, but failed. Subsequently, Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian used slapping, smashing objects, and verbal threats to forcibly extort 4,500 RMB from the restaurant owner, Cheng. On the same day, defendant Deng called to persuade co-defendants Lu and Tian to surrender, after which Lu and Tian voluntarily turned themselves in to the police. After the incident, the family of defendant Weng fully compensated the victim Cheng for the stolen money. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian during the court proceedings and are substantiated by: (1) demographic information, case registration form, criminal judgment, release certificate, outpatient medical records, CT diagnosis report, receipt copies; (2) statements from witnesses Qin, Yang, Peng, and others, as well as arrest and situation reports from police investigators; (3) statement from the victim Cheng; (4) confessions and defenses of defendants Weng, Deng, Lu, and Tian; (5) identification records, on-site investigation records, site maps, and photographs as evidence.", "label": {"Weng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on August 2, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendants Wei and Li were riding an electric scooter near Dacheng Road in Sijiqing New Village, Congtai District of a certain city when they had a verbal altercation with Wang. The defendants Wei and Li injured Wang. According to the appraisal, the injury to the victim Wang was classified as minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, the two defendants voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities and compensated the victim for economic losses, thereby obtaining understanding. The defendants did not contest the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, and these are corroborated by the victim's statement, witnesses' testimonies, the appraisal report, a reconciliation document, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 1 a.m. on December 12, 2011, the victim Dong was shopping on Taobao when 116,230 RMB from his China Construction Bank online banking account was defrauded and all used to purchase China Unicom mobile recharge cards on the China Unicom website and then resold. Defendant Chen knowingly acquired 17,020 RMB worth of Unicom recharge cards obtained through online fraud by others and subsequently resold them to Xie. Defendant Xie also knowingly acquired and resold items obtained through online fraud, earning illicit funds totaling 16×××39.20 RMB. On January 15, 2013, defendant Chen surrendered himself to the Public Security Bureau. Regarding the aforementioned facts, the prosecution has provided evidence including the confessions and defenses of the two defendants, the victim Dong's statement, Taobao transaction records, relevant bank documents, household registration certificates, and details of the arrest.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Jiang Peng (handled in a separate case) suspected her husband of having an inappropriate relationship with the victim Wang A. She went to confront Wang A. On the evening of June 3, 2015, Wang A, along with Wang B, Gao Bob, and Zhang Shan, went to Jiang Peng's house to confront her because of this incident. Wang A instigated a dispute with Jiang Peng. Later, Jiang Peng reported the incident to the defendants Zhang (Jiang Peng's mother) and Jiang (Jiang Peng's brother). At around 10 a.m. on June 5, 2015, the defendants Jiang, Zhang, and Dong (Jiang Peng's mother-in-law), along with Jiang Peng and her sister Jiang Zhen (handled in a separate case), as well as Jiang's colleagues Cui Jian and Chen Dong, went to a \"certain hotel\" at the Wangcheng Subdistrict Office in Laixi City, where Wang A and Wang B were, under the pretense of \"seeking justice.\" \n\nUpon arriving at the hotel, defendants Jiang, Zhang, and Dong, together with Jiang Peng, Jiang Zhen, and others, engaged in a physical altercation with the victims Wang A and Wang B. Defendant Jiang punched and kicked Shi Li and Wang A. According to a forensic medical evaluation, Wang B sustained two facial injuries classified as minor injuries, Wang A's facial injuries were classified as minor injuries, and Shi Li's superficial soft tissue bruises did not constitute minor injuries.\n\nIn order to substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including the case origin, the investigation process, the defendants' confessions and defenses, the victims' statements, witness testimonies, identification records, the forensic medical evaluation of injuries, relevant documentary evidence, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on May 26, 2017, at around 7 a.m., the victims Ji and Ye, along with others, went to a construction site in the XX district to haul materials. The defendant, Chen, stopped them on the grounds that the materials they were hauling were under his jurisdiction. During the ensuing dispute, Chen called over defendants Liang, Xue, and Liu. During this time, defendants Chen, Liang, Liu, and Xue pushed victims Ye and Ji and others, and then both parties used wooden battens from the site to fight each other, resulting in injuries to the abdominal area of victim Ji and the head of victim Ye. According to the assessment, victim Ye sustained one first-degree minor injury, one second-degree minor injury, and two slight injuries, while victim Ji sustained a second-degree serious injury. To substantiate the charges mentioned above, the prosecution presented evidence in court, including the case registration form, police report, household registration certificates, hospital", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xue": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that from July 18 to July 20, 2012, defendants Wang and Shen jointly operated a casino. Defendant Wang was responsible for gathering participants for gambling; defendant Shen was responsible for arranging the casino location and preparing gambling tools; defendant Hou was responsible for managing the operation, taking commissions, and participating in gambling; defendant Fu offered loans at high interest within the casino; defendant Gu transported participants; defendant Zhu kept watch for the casino.\n\n1. On July 18, 2012, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, and Gu operated a casino at No. 26 Xia Xiaobang, Fuzhen Village, Zhongdai Street, in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, and others, and obtaining over 5,000 yuan in commissions.\n\n2. On the afternoon of July 19 of the same year, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu operated a casino at No. 40 Jiangbang, a certain village in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, Tang, and others, and obtaining over 4,000 yuan in commissions.\n\n3. On the afternoon of July 20 of the same year, defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu operated a casino at No. 22 Youchebang, Shuguang Village, Zhongdai Street, in a certain city, gathering gambling participants Shao, Chen, Tang, and Tang, and obtaining over 1,600 yuan in commissions.\n\nAdditionally, it was found that 4,200 yuan of gambling funds was confiscated from defendant Hou; and a set of mahjong tiles was confiscated from defendant Wang. The defendants Shen, Wang, Hou, Fu, Gu, and Zhu raised no objections regarding the aforementioned criminal facts during the court trial. Moreover, these facts are supported by witness testimonies, inspection certificates, inspection records, lists of confiscated items, the incident process, capture process, public security administrative punishment decisions, criminal record inquiries, situation explanations, and household registration proofs, all of which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: On February 16, 2016, at around 9 p.m., the defendants Wang and Shuai, after drinking, went with Li A, Shuai 1, Li B, and Wang 1 (all handled in separate cases) to Jiubai KTV on the street of Shanpen Town, Huichuan District, in a certain city to drink and sing. A dispute arose with the KTV management staff over bringing snacks inside. The defendants Shuai, Wang, and others disregarded the dissuasion by Zhang 1 and Huang and assaulted Zhang 1 and Huang. After the police arrived, Li A, Wang 1, and Shuai 1 were orally summoned to the Shanpen Police Station, while the defendants Shuai and Wang took the opportunity to leave the scene. Subsequently, the defendants Shuai and Wang each returned to Jiubai KTV armed with two kitchen knives and encountered the victim Huang. The two of them used the kitchen knives they carried to injure Huang's head and hands. According to the forensic evaluation, the injuries sustained by Zhang 1 and Huang were classified as minor injuries. After the incident, the defendants Wang, Shuai, and the other four compensated Jiubai KTV for the property damage and the related losses of the victims Zhang 1 and Huang in the total amount of 29,000 yuan. Zhang 1 and Huang expressed understanding for the actions of the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were admitted by the defendants Wang and Shuai, and are further supported by their confessions at the police station, the statements of the victims Zhang 1 and Huang, testimonies from witnesses Shuai, Li 2, Li 3, Wang 2, Zhang 2, and Hu 2, the forensic evaluation document, seizure list, on-site inspection record, diagram and photos of the scene, photos identifying tools used in the crime, compensation agreement, receipt, letter of understanding, household registration documents, and other evidence. The defendants Wang and Shuai raised no objections to the above evidence, and it will not be elaborated further, as the trial presentation and cross-examination are sufficient for its verification.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Shuai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on September 27, 2013, at around 12 PM, defendant Cheng purchased a small packet of heroin from defendant Liu for 100 yuan in cash. After using some himself, Cheng attempted to sell the remaining heroin to a drug user, Huang, for 100 yuan in front of the Wuwei City Hemp Textile Factory residential complex, where he was caught in the act by law enforcement officers. The police seized 0.06 grams of heroin from Huang and a \"Coobe\" mobile phone from defendant Cheng. On September 28 of the same year, defendant Liu was arrested and confessed to having sold drugs to defendant Cheng. During the arrest, investigators found two small packets of heroin weighing 0.18 grams in total, as well as a \"Lenovo\" mobile phone, on defendant Liu. The aforementioned facts are supported by evidence presented in court by the prosecution, including the case registration form, the decision to file a case, witness testimonies, seizure lists and photographs, weighing records, examination and identification reports, identification records, and the confessions of the defendants, all of which were verified to be accurate through cross-examination.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On May 10, 2015, at approximately 22:30, defendants Jiang, Wang, Tian (separately prosecuted), and Guan (separately prosecuted), after conspiring, went to the \"Changchun Changran\" guesthouse in a certain district of Changchun City. Tian and Guan, under the pretense of needing accommodation, asked the victim Wei A to show them a room. When the reception desk was unattended, defendants Jiang and Wang stole 525 RMB in cash, a pack of hard-pack Zhonghua cigarettes (valued at 45 RMB), and a pack of premium Yunyan cigarettes (valued at 23 RMB). On May 11, 2015, at around 00:00, the same defendants conspired and went to the \"Yaju\" Inn on Lequn Street in the Erdao District of Changchun City. Tian and Guan, under the pretense of needing accommodation, asked the victim Wang to show them a room. When the reception desk was unattended, defendants Jiang and Wang stole 1,900 RMB in cash from a black bag at the foot of the bed. On May 11, 2015, at approximately 00:30, the four were at the \"Panshi Yijia\" Hotel in the Nanguan District of Changchun City. While the staff member Zhang was away from the reception desk, defendants Wang, Tian, and Guan kept watch, while defendant Jiang stole 200 RMB from the drawer of the reception desk. These facts, to which defendant Jiang raised no objection during the court hearing, are substantiated by the identification of the stolen money in photographs, site identification records and photos, inventory of seized and returned items, the criminal judgment, statements from the victims Wang, Wei, and Jiang, testimony from witness Zhang, confessions from defendants Jiang and Wang, confessions from co-defendants Tian and Guan, expert opinions, identification records, and surveillance footage from the burglarized hotels, proving the case beyond doubt.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: The defendant Lin handed over his ID card to Zhao for the purpose of applying for a credit card. In October 2009, defendant Zhao used both his own and Lin's ID cards to apply for credit cards with the Bank of China, obtaining cards with numbers ending in ... Subsequently, Zhao and Lin gave these two cards to Han for use. By the time the case was uncovered, the credit card with the number ending in ... had outstanding principal of 14,086.55 yuan, and the credit card with the number ending in ... had outstanding principal of 19,804.99 yuan. After multiple repayment demands by the bank, Zhao and Lin refused to repay. After the case was uncovered, defendant Lin repaid part of the overdraft principal and interest. In support of the above charges, the prosecution presented the following evidence in court: (1) Confessions and defenses of defendants Zhao and Lin; (2) Statement by the representative of the victimized unit, Ma; (3) Testimonies from witnesses Han, Zhou, Shi, Guan, and others; (4) Documentary evidence including the criminal judgment, indictment, transaction details, etc.; (5) Other materials.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of February 16, 2015, Du A (already sentenced) felt aggrieved after being beaten while attempting to collect a debt at the home of He Jia in a certain village within the Economic Development Zone of Yongkang City. Upon returning home, he informed the defendant Du and others, including Du and Yang (already sentenced), about the incident. After a discussion, they decided to go to He Jia's house to demand an explanation. They then gathered dozens of people, including Yao, Zhang, and Cheng (all handled in separate cases), and prepared tools such as kitchen knives and watermelon knives. Meanwhile, the defendant Wang, who was at He Jia's home, heard that Du A and others were rallying dozens of people to cause trouble for He Jia. Wang then called and gathered Wang A (already sentenced), Lin A, and Lin B (handled in separate cases) to He Jia's home, telling them, \"Someone is coming to make trouble, so stay on guard.\" Subsequently, dozens of p", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After investigation, it was found that defendants Li and Yang, after conspiring, carried lock-picking tools such as keys, iron rods, T-shaped iron bars, and adhesive tape. On April 15, 2016, at approximately 11:00 a.m., in the Xin Hui District of a certain city, they broke into the residence of Mai and stole over 1,000 RMB, 1,020 Hong Kong dollars, 30 copper coins, and 0.31 kilograms of dried tangerine peel, with a total value of over 2,091 RMB. On the same day, at approximately 12:00 p.m., the defendants Li and Yang broke into the residence of Tam in the same district using the same means, stealing over 2,000 RMB and 660 Hong Kong dollars, with a total value of over 2,545 RMB. After the crime, defendants Li and Yang were caught by police officers while fleeing the scene, caught with the stolen goods. Defendants Li and Yang committed theft twice, with the total value of stolen goods exceeding 4,630 RMB. During the court trial, defendants Li and Yang did not contest these facts. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Mai and Tam, the confiscated stolen money and goods, the tools used in the crime, the appraisal report of the stolen goods' value, foreign exchange rate certification, the arrest process, the case-solving process, the criminal verdict, and the crime scene investigation records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 12 p.m. on November 6, 2018, the defendants Zhao and Peng sold 0.3 grams of the drug heroin to a drug user named Li from Zhangye in room 1209 of the Marco Polo Shangpin Hotel in a city of a certain county. They were apprehended by police officers on the spot, and 0.12 grams of heroin were seized at the scene. During the trial, the defendants Zhao and Peng raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Zhou, and Gao, WeChat screenshots, identification records, seizure records, weighing records, lists of seized items and documents, photographs, lists of items and documents transferred with the case, on-site inspection reports, drug testing reports, call logs, the defendants' household registration information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on June 25, 2014, around 10 PM, the defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen were dining at a hot pot restaurant on the west section of Wensheng Road in a certain town of a certain county, when defendant Fan, without cause, got into a dispute with the victim Wang who was dining at a different table. Subsequently, defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen jointly assaulted victim Wang, resulting in bilateral nasal bone fractures for Wang. According to the assessment, the extent of Wang's injuries was classified as minor injury of the second degree. It was further discovered that at 10:50 PM on June 25, 2014, defendants Fan and Xia were transferred by the Special Patrol Police Brigade of a certain county's Public Security Bureau to the Huagai Police Station of the same bureau for investigation. On June 26, 2014, after being notified by phone by the police officers of Huagai Police Station, defendant Shen voluntarily went to the station on the same day to accept investigation. It was also determined that defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen have compensated victim Wang and obtained his understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen during the trial, and were supported by evidence such as the acceptance registration form, decision to file the case, explanation of the circumstances of the case, on-site inspection records, identification records, appraisal opinions, household registration certificates, receipts, the letter of understanding, audio-visual materials, the statement of victim Wang, testimonies of witnesses Sun, Sui, Jiang, Cao, Li, Mi, Gu, Jing, and another Li, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Fan, Xia, and Shen, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that from March 2018 to February 2019, defendants Zheng, Ge, and Wang, in collusion with Tong, Xu, Xie, Wang, Wu, Ge, Zheng, Sun, Zhang (all already sentenced), used the \"Feizhuxia\" online loan platform in a certain city of a certain province to issue high-interest loans. After the loans were due, they sent messages and made phone calls to the borrowers and their relatives and friends, threatening the borrowers to repay the loans, which eventually led one of the borrowers, another Wang, to commit suicide by ingesting pesticide on February 24, 2019. After the incident, defendants Zheng, Ge, and Wang actively compensated the victim's family for their loss and obtained understanding. In support of the above charges, the prosecution has provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, and other evidence to this court.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: In the early morning of April 11, 2013, the defendants Guan and Liu, after prior discussion, used the method of pushing away the vehicle and then using a lock to steal a Morakot brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Lan, in front of a rental house at No. 2, East section of Wenyuan Community, Xintang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. The bike was valued at 1,784 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Guan and Liu during the trial. The case is supported by the testimony of the victim Lan, the witness accounts of Wu and Zhang, identification records, a key, a seizure list, a list of returned items, a price appraisal conclusion, the incident details, an explanatory note, Guan's household registration certificate, a photograph of Liu, and the defendants Guan and Liu's previous criminal records, all of which provide sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Guan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on November 11, 2013, at around 2:00 PM, defendants Xie and his wife, Huang, at Wangjia Leather Factory on Westmelon Ridge, Lane 21, No. 8, in a town in Huadu District, requested to resign and settle their wages with the victim, their boss Ma, when a dispute arose. Subsequently, defendants Xie, Liao, and an accomplice \"Fei Zai\" (handled in a separate case) had a confrontation with the victim Ma, during which defendants Xie, Liao, and the accomplice \"Fei Zai\" used fists, knives, stools, and other tools to assault the victim Ma. According to the assessment, the victim Ma sustained minor injuries. During the altercation, the victim Ma's wife, Mo, was also injured. An assessment determined that her injuries were also classified as minor.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from March 2012 to July 2014, defendants Cao and Xia, among others, engaged in illegal pyramid schemes using a \"voluntary capital operation chain business\" (falsely claiming to be the national 1040 project). They organized over 40 people to conduct these activities in a certain city, specifically in a district town and the Xin Garden community of a district bridge. The organizational structure was a five-level, three-progression system, requiring new members to pay RMB 3,800 for joining qualification, after which they would receive corresponding rewards based on the number of new members they developed. During this period, defendant Cao, by developing defendant Xia and other downlines, accumulated over 600 shares under his name, reaching the rank of \"General Manager.\" Defendant Xia, by developing downlines as well, also accumulated over 600 shares under his name, reaching the rank of \"General Manager.\" Defendants Cao and Xia were subsequently apprehended and brought to justice by public security authorities on January 17, 2015. Both defendant Cao and his defense counsel, as well as defendant Xia and his defense counsel, raised no objection to the facts and charges in the indictment. Defendant Cao's defense counsel expressed the following defense opinions: 1. Cao is willing to voluntarily plead guilty; 2. Voluntarily pay the fine; 3. He is a first-time offender, and his subjective malignancy and social harm are relatively minor. The counsel requested the court to mitigate his punishment. Defendant Xia's defense counsel argued: 1. Xia is willing to voluntarily plead guilty; 2. Willing to actively pay the fine; 3. The subjective malignancy and social harm of the crime are minor, and he is a first-time offender. The counsel requested the court for a lenient sentence. These facts are verified by evidence such as the arrest and case-solving reports issued by a district branch of the city public security bureau; testimonies from witnesses Zhu A, Zhu, Yu, Liu Jia, Liu Yi, Wang, Wang A; identification records; organizational structure charts; copies of related notes; criminal judgments of co-defendants; identity materials of defendants Cao and Xia; defendants Cao and Xia's confessions and defenses; and other materials, sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on October 11, 2016, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Hu and Chen, following a premeditated plan, conspired to steal about 120 meters of copper core cable wire belonging to the victim, Guo, near the Jinji Mountain Gas Station on National Highway 104 in the development area of this city. They used pliers to cut and dragged the cables by hand, with a total value of more than RMB 3272.4 yuan. After the theft, they sold the stolen goods and received RMB 1070, which was subsequently squandered. After the incident, the defendants Hu and Chen compensated the victim Guo with RMB 3000, and during the trial of this case, the defendants Hu and Chen returned RMB 272 to this court. These facts, to which the defendants Hu and Chen raised no objections during the trial, are supported by evidence including: the statement of the victim Guo; the testimony of the witness Yang; identification records and photographs; investigation experiment records; on-site inspection records, diagrams, and photographs; lists and photos of seized items and returns; delivery notes; receipts; the apprehension report provided by the public security investigators; the price appraisal conclusion document [2016] No. 558 from the Hujia Appraisal; surveillance video and screenshots; administrative penalty decision; the household registration information of the defendants Hu and Chen; and the confessions and defenses provided by the defendants Hu and Chen, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that from March to September 2015, the defendant Dai, on three occasions, allowed Zhang, Shen, and others to use methamphetamine (ice) in the vehicle he drove and in a hotel; the defendant Shen, on two occasions, allowed Zhang and Dai to use methamphetamine (ice) in a hotel. The specific criminal facts are as follows: \n\n1. One morning in March 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Zhang and Shen to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.\n\n2. One evening in July 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Zhang to use ice once in the car with license plate Su A×××××, parked on the roadside opposite the traffic accident handling center in a certain town in a certain city.\n\n3. In the early morning of September 1, 2015, the defendant Dai allowed Shen to use ice once in the car with license plate Su A×××××, parked on the roadside west of a village in a certain town in a certain city.\n\n4. One afternoon in April 2015, the defendant Shen allowed Zhang and Dai to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.\n\n5. On a day in April 2015, the defendant Shen allowed Zhang to use ice once in a room at the Super 8 Hotel in a certain town in a certain city.\n\nThe defendants Dai and Shen were later apprehended by the public security organs due to drug use, during which they truthfully confessed to the criminal facts of allowing others to use drugs. Regarding the above facts, the defendants Dai and Shen raised no objection during the trial, and there is sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including the confessions of the two defendants; the testimony of witness Zhang; documentary evidence such as personal information, circumstances of apprehension, motor vehicle information, hotel industry security management information from a certain province, administrative penalty decision letters; recognition records and photographs.", "label": {"Dai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the charges by the prosecution, at the end of December 2012, the defendant Ding agreed to partner with Jiang and Gu to conduct a business and paid a deposit of 45,000 yuan. It was also agreed that if the cooperation was unsuccessful, Jiang and Gu would return the deposit. On the afternoon of December 31 of that year, because Jiang and Gu failed to fulfill the agreement resulting in the failure of cooperation, the defendant Ding demanded the return of the deposit from them in Room 301 of Jinxiuhaitian Hotel, Donggang Street, in this district, but they expressed they could not return it at the moment. The defendant Ding then contacted the defendant Kang by phone to ask for help in retrieving the deposit. Subsequently, the defendant Kang gathered \"Baldy\" and four others to Room 301 of Jinxiuhaitian Hotel, took Jiang and Gu to a certain L××××× minivan, and restricted their personal freedom. During this period, under the instigation of defendant Ding, \"Baldy\" and others used verbal threats, as well as physical violence with fists, feet, and wooden sticks, to force Jiang and Gu to return the deposit. By approximately 2:00 a.m. on January 1, 2013, fearing discovery by the police, defendant Kang and others let Jiang and Gu get off the vehicle. On January 1 and February 25, 2013, defendants Ding and Kang respectively turned themselves in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Ding and Kang during ", "label": {"Ding": ["Imprisonment"], "Kang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of a certain Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: At 17:00 on June 12, 2015, defendants Wu and Lin sold a small bag containing 1.8 grams of the drug \"methamphetamine\" to drug purchaser Qin for 600 yuan at the intersection near No. 64, a certain lane on a certain avenue, in a certain district of a city. After the transaction was completed, they were caught on the spot by the public security authorities. Upon evaluation, the drugs sold by defendants Wu and Lin were found to contain methamphetamine. During the court trial, defendants Wu and Lin raised no objections to the aforementioned facts, which are corroborated by the following evidence, verified and confirmed through court examination: case acceptance registration form, case filing decision, confessions of defendants Wu and Lin, testimony of witness Qin, inspection records, weighing records and weighing photos, identification records and identification photos, evidence preservation decision, evidence preservation inventory, the drug identification certificate and identification opinion notice from a city's Public Security Bureau, confiscation certificate of drugs, documentation of the apprehension process, case-solving report, explanatory notes, household registration information of defendants Wu and Lin, etc. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is concrete and sufficient to support the charges.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain banner in a certain autonomous region charges that from the night of July 24 to the early morning of July 25, 2016, the defendants Hu, Ji, Da, and Na rode two-wheeled motorcycles to chase and capture 37 live wild hares approximately 4 kilometers east of the Bajie Highway in a certain town of a certain banner in a certain autonomous region. They used methods such as nighttime lighting and nets to accomplish this before being apprehended by forest police officers from the Forest Public Security Bureau of that banner in the autonomous region. According to the judicial appraisal conducted by the Dongying branch of the Forest Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center of the State Forestry Administration, the animals sent for inspection were identified as European hares, which are classified as wildlife under national protection due to their beneficial or significant economic and scientific research value (referred to as \"three-category protected animals\"). The above-mentioned facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the court trial, and were substantiated by the following evidence: the case registration form numbered [2016]04 from individual A's (criminal) file, site identification records and photos, identification records and photos, on-site inspection records, on-site inspection diagrams, photos, seizure records, lists of seized items, case transfer inventory, household registration certificates, the case-solving process, the witness testimony of Meng, the material evidence appraisal document numbered Lin Si Dong Jian Zi [2016]573, and the confessions of defendants Hu, Ji, Da, and Na. These pieces of evidence are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention"], "Ji": ["Detention"], "Da": ["Detention"], "Na": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: At around 4 a.m. on August 22, 2017, the defendants Wei and Zhou discovered the victim, Lu, extremely intoxicated and unconscious on the middle section of the Wenchang Bridge on Youyi Road in the Chengzhong District of this city. Zhou proceeded to steal an Apple brand phone from Lu, and the two fled the scene. Later, Wei sold the phone at a low price to someone else. An appraisal determined that the stolen phone was valued at 3,720 RMB. On August 23, 2017, the defendants Wei and Zhou were arrested by the public security authorities; subsequently, Wei assisted the authorities in recovering the stolen phone. The public security authorities lawfully seized the stolen phone and have returned it to the victim according to the law. The actions of Wei and Zhou constitute the crime of x, and this court is requested to punish them according to law. The aforementioned facts are uncontested by defendants Wei and Zhou during the trial, and are corroborated by the materials filed in the case, the statement of the victim Lu, the testimony of the witness Mo, the on-site identification records and photos, the identification logs and photos, the seizure decision and list, the return list, the price appraisal conclusion and the notice of appraisal opinion, the criminal judgment and certificate of release, the account of the case, the resolution of the case, the account of the capture, the household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a district in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, charged that on June 9, 2015, at approximately 9:07 am, the defendants Liu and Jiang, together with \"A\", \"Xiuxiu\", \"Junjun\", and two other women (all handled in separate cases), were driven by Liu in a Wuling Zhiguang minivan with the license plate Yue S××××× to transport the aforementioned individuals from the city to the Kanghong Pharmacy in Huaxing Market, Yongning Street, in a certain town. Defendant Jiang and the other women entered the store and stole a batch of medicines belonging to the victim Xu Yi (valued at a total of RMB 6,552), after which defendant Liu drove the vehicle to assist in their departure. At approximately 9:28 am on the same day, defendant Liu drove Jiang and the others to Love Child Island Maternal and Infant Chain Store at 154 Fengxin Garden, Phoenix City, Yongning Street in a certain district. Co-defendants \"A\" and others entered the store and stole a batch of milk powder belonging to the victim Yang Yi (valued at RMB 3,526), after which defendant Jiang assisted outside the store by carrying the milk powder into the vehicle, and defendant Liu drove the vehicle to assist in their departure. On July 29, 2015, defendants Liu and Jiang were apprehended near the Yuebei Station on the Jingzhu Expressway, and at the scene, four boxes of stolen medicines were recovered and subsequently returned to the victim Xu Yi.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Public Prosecutor's Office charges: 1. On December 25, 2016, at around 21:00, the defendant Liu, together with Li1, Li2, Hu (all of whom have been sentenced), and Zhuo (handled separately), under the influence of alcohol, without provocation, used threats with knives, punching, and kicking, to injure Wang2, Zhang1, Gao, and Wang1 at the entrance of the Siji Hotel on the northern section of Liquan Street, Gaomi City. According to the forensic appraisal of Gaomi City Public Security Bureau, the injuries sustained by Wang2, Zhang1, and Wang1 were all classified as minor injuries. 2. On March 8, 2017, at around 16:00, due to a debt dispute with Tao1, the defendant Ye instructed and collaborated with Liu, Zhuo (handled separately), and Li3 (handled separately), using methods such as slapping, punching, kicking, and taking Tao1 to the riverbank to undress and freeze, to threaten and coerce Tao1 to repay the debt. Later, Ye arranged for Liu to take Tao1 to room 108 in a motel on the west side of Qingdao University of Science and Technology in Gaomi City and prevent him from leaving, until Tao1 was rescued at 23:00 on March 8. To substantiate the above charges, the Public Prosecutor's Office read and presented evidence in court including the defendant's confession, victim's statement, witness testimony, documentary evidence, appraisal opinion, identification record, and the guilty plea and penalty agreement.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local people's procuratorate charges: Defendant Hu served as a truck driver at Wenzhou Kaiyue Building Materials Co., Ltd. From March to July 2014, Defendant Hu repeatedly drove the truck with the license plate Zhejiang J××××× back to the company's premises after delivering goods and diverted it to a scrap collection point operated by Defendant Jin and others. Using a wrench, he opened the outlet secured with screws beneath the truck's fuel tank. Jin and others then inserted a plastic tube into the fuel tank to extract and steal diesel. Hu subsequently sold the stolen diesel to Jin and others, carrying out theft seven to eight times a month, earning over 4,000 yuan illegally. Investigation revealed that between May and July 2014, Hu drove the truck with the license plate Zhejiang J77905 to Jin’s scrap collection point located beside a village road in Ruian, Binhai Avenue, Wenzhou. Using the aforementioned method, he stole diesel from the truck and sold it to Jin. Each theft involved 20 to 40 jin of diesel, and he committed theft seven times in total, earning over 800 yuan illegally. After the case was uncovered, Defendant Hu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and compensated the victim with 16,000 yuan for their loss. In support of the above accusations, the prosecution has submitted relevant evidence.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 20:40 on December 8, 2015, the defendant He was driving a motorcycle carrying the defendant Li near a bus stop in a certain village on Tongji East Road in a certain district of a city in Guangdong Province. He was driving to assist, and Li got off the motorcycle and walked. Taking advantage of the victim Zhong's unpreparedness, Li snatched an iPhone 6 Plus worth 3,818 RMB from Zhong with his bare hands. After succeeding, the two defendants fled the scene on the motorcycle. At around 17:00 on the 11th of the same month, the police arrested defendants Li and He in a rental apartment in the Weiguo District of Tangfang Village on Zhongyi Road in a certain district of a city and seized the aforementioned stolen phone from Li on the spot (the phone involved has been returned to the victim Zhong). The above facts were not disputed by defendants Li and He during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including the victim Zhong's report and identification record, seizure record, seizure decision, and seizure list, return list, price appraisal certificate, arrest process, household registration certificates, criminal judgment and release certificate, as well as the confessions and identification records of defendants Li and He during the investigation phase, which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: On May 27, 2014, at approximately 18:00, defendant Li gave 1.4 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Zhang at the entrance of the Wutong Business Hotel in Dayingpo, a district of a certain city. Defendant Zhang was then apprehended by police officers while selling the 1.4 grams of methamphetamine he had purchased to Zou, who was waiting there. The 1.4 grams of methamphetamine were seized on the spot, and later, police officers arrested defendant Li near the Wutong Business Hotel. It was also found that defendant Li sold the 2 grams of methamphetamine to defendant Zhang at a price of 250 yuan per gram, and defendant Zhang had agreed with Zou to sell him 2 grams of methamphetamine at a price of 300 yuan per gram. A mobile phone used by defendant Li to contact defendant Zhang for drug transactions, as well as a mobile phone used by defendant Zhang to contact Zou for drug transactions, were confiscated by the police. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were substantiated by their household registration certificates and confessions, testimony from witness Zou, confiscation lists, drug test reports, photos of the heroin, drug weighing records, drug identification conclusions, call records, and the police account of the arrest process, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Wenshui County in a certain province charged that prior to the Spring Festival in 2019, defendants Song and Wu conspired to hunt wild animals and prepared hunting tools such as iron traps, wire loops, and netting. On January 24, 2019, the two drove a black Nissan car with the license plate number Jin A16B28, belonging to Song, into a gully near a certain county of a certain province to set up the hunting tools. On the 26th of the same month, when the two returned by car to the location where the hunting tools were placed to check for prey, they were caught by law enforcement officers including officers from a certain provincial forest police bureau. They had hunted one grass rabbit and one pheasant.", "label": {"Song": ["Detention"], "Wu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Pingguo County, a certain district in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, charges that the defendants Lu, Yang, and another individual Ma (handled in a separate case), conspired to interfere with others' normal car locking using a car door lock jammer, subsequently stealing items from the car. On November 28, 2013, at approximately 8 a.m., the defendants Lu, Yang, and Ma drove a Wuling minivan with the license plate number Gui A××××× to the vicinity of the main gate of the First Kindergarten of Pingguo County. As the victim, Lu, was locking his car with a remote control, defendant Lu used the jammer for electronic interference, causing a false lock situation. After the victim Lu left, defendants Yang and Ma stole a handbag from the trunk of Lu's parked BYD sedan. The bag contained more than 7,000 yuan in cash, bank cards, an ID card, and other items. The prosecution presented relevant evidence to support the alleged facts.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between February 2015 and November 5, 2015, the defendant Kuang, together with defendant Shang, placed gambling machines in various locations in a certain county and town for others to gamble. These locations included the game room behind the elderly pavilion on the east bank, the \"Chongqing Spicy Restaurant\" opposite the east bank credit union, the game room near Wenxi First Primary School, the game room near Wendong Park, and the billiard room on the second floor of Fengyun Internet Cafe. They agreed with the operators of these venues to pay them a monthly rent ranging from 400 to 1000 yuan, as well as a 10% share of the profits from the gambling machines. Defendants Kuang and Shang made a profit of over 12,800 yuan by placing gambling machines in the game room behind the elderly pavilion on the east bank operated by defendant Wang, from which defendant Wang personally made a profit of over 8,000 yuan. It was verified that defendants Kuang and Shang made a total profit of more than 35,000 yuan by placing gambling machines in the aforementioned five locations. On November 5, 2015, defendants Kuang, Shang, and Wang were legally arrested by the public security organs in a certain county and town. During the trial of this case, defendants Kuang, Shang, and Wang each returned illegal proceeds of 5,000 yuan, 12,000 yuan, and 8,000 yuan, respectively. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Kuang, Shang, Wang, and their defense lawyers Wang A, Shu, and Du during the court hearing. Furthermore, they were substantiated by evidence reviewed and verified in court, including 702 one-yuan coins, the identity information of the three defendants, an inventory of seized items and documents by the county public security bureau, the process of apprehension, receipts, testimonies of witnesses Sun, Li, Chen, and Feng, confessions and defenses of defendants Kuang, Shang, Wang, and accomplice Dong, recognition opinion on electronic gaming facilities and equipment No. 007 (2015) by the county public security bureau, search records, photos, and identification transcripts, etc., sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Kuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Starting from the evening of August 8, 2019, defendants Liang and Guo organized gamblers, with defendant Guo providing a room on the first floor at No. 15, Guocun Tou Shan Street, in a certain district of a city, for the gamblers to use as a casino, profiting from a rake system until the operation was raided in the early morning of August 12, 2019. At the scene, 12 gambling participants were apprehended, including Liang, Yu, and Xu, along with gambling equipment and funds. It is considered that defendants Guo and Liang have circumstances of pleading guilty and accepting punishment; defendant Guo has circumstances of voluntary surrender and being an accessory. It is recommended to sentence defendants Guo and Liang to a fixed-term imprisonment of seven to ten months and impose a fine of 2,000 to 4,000 RMB. For defendant Guo, it is recommended to sentence to a fixed-term imprisonment of six to nine months or criminal detention, and impose a fine of 2,000 to 4,000 RMB. Furthermore, it was found that defendants Guo and Liang were apprehended by public security authorities on August 12, 2019. Defendant Guo voluntarily went to the public security authorities for investigation after being summoned by them on August 14, 2019. Defendants Guo, Liang, and Guo have no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations alleged and have signed in acknowledgment, and they also raised no objections during the court proceedings.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "On January 6, 2014, at approximately 1:00 AM, defendants Zhao and Bai went to the front of Linhuayuan Community in a certain district of a certain city. Taking advantage of the opportunity when no one was present, they stole two car batteries belonging to the victim Liu, valued at 1,450 yuan. Four minutes later, defendants Zhao and Bai went to the front of Tang's location in the same district and city. Again, taking advantage of the opportunity when no one was present, they stole a car battery belonging to the victim Wang, valued at 200 yuan. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 21:00 on August 4, 2013, defendants Ji and Sun had a dispute with the victim, Geng, over issues such as occupying seats without making purchases in front of the Guanglin Barbecue Restaurant operated by Ji at No. 9 Jiaxing Road, Shibei District, in this city. Subsequently, Ji and Sun injured Geng, causing a fracture of Geng's left nasal bone and maxillary frontal process. According to the forensic medical examination, this constituted a Level 2 minor injury. Additionally, Geng sustained a laceration of the skin on the left upper eyelid and contusions and abrasions of the body's soft tissues, constituting slight injuries. Later, defendants Ji and Sun were apprehended. To prove the aforementioned charges, the public prosecution agency read out or presented the following evidence in court: 1. Registration form for receiving a criminal case, documents on the case's development, and the process of apprehension and other documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Lian; 3. Statement of the victim, Geng; 4. Confessions of defendants Ji and Sun; 5. Identification records, etc.; 6. Forensic medical report on the degree of bodily injuries, etc.", "label": {"Ji": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 7 PM on July 22, 2013, police officers from the Public Security Brigade of a certain county's Public Security Bureau, acting on a public tip-off, went to the storefront at 29 Hebeng Road, Dianbu Town, in said county, and seized on the scene 9 gambling machines (18 operational units) including \"Interstellar Baby,\" \"Global Entertainment,\" \"Fishing Machine,\" \"Slot Machine,\" and two accounting slips. Investigation revealed that this gambling establishment was set up by the defendant Liu in early June 2013 for gambling purposes. During this period, an illegal profit of approximately 3,000 yuan was made. Defendant Zhou began working at this gambling venue in late June 2013, providing services for gamblers, such as adding points, refunding points, and collecting money. It was also found that defendant Liu returned 2,000 yuan of the illicit gains during the trial period at this court. The above-mentioned facts are confirmed by the following main evidence presented and cross-examined during the trial: the confessions of the two defendants, witness testimonies, on-site diagrams and photos, identification records, inspection records, medical records, details of the case registration, and household registration certificates, all of which this court has verified.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: 1. On a morning around February 18, 2015, the defendant Wei stole a Xiaomi 2S mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Quan at the pedestrian street in Keqiao, a district in a certain city. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 896 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of February 20, 2015, the defendant Wei stole an OPPO N5117 mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Wang at the ancient street in Anchang, a town in a certain district. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 975 yuan. 3. On the evening of March 25, 2015, the defendants Wei and Liao went to the vicinity of Dongchang Vegetable Market in a town of a certain district. Liao was responsible for keeping watch, while Wei stole a Huawei Honor Play 4X mobile phone from the jacket pocket of Zhou A. After appraisal, the phone involved in the case was valued at 893 yuan. In summary, the defendant Wei committed theft three times, with the total value of stolen property amounting to 2,764 yuan. The defendant Liao committed theft once, with the value of the stolen property being 893 yuan. After the incident, all mobile phones involved in the case were recovered and returned to each victim. The above facts have not been contested by defendants Wei and Liao during the trial, and are substantiated by evidence including photographs of the stolen goods, criminal judgment documents, lists of seized and returned items, evidence reception lists, base information of the mobile phone packaging boxes, the arrest process, explanations of circumstances, statements from Quan, Wang, Zhou A, the price appraisal conclusion document Shao Ke Jia Jian Zi (2015) No. 0163, and the identification record of Wei, which are sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial examination, it was found that at approximately 22:00 on December 3, 2013, defendant Sun and Zhang had an argument over trivial matters at the \"Golden Station\" KTV in Zhongyang Mall, Fengcheng Town, in a certain county. Later, at the entrance of the KTV, defendant Sun punched victim Zhang in the face, and defendant Tang then approached and shoved victim Zhang to the ground. Subsequently, defendants Sun and Tang continued to kick victim Zhang, causing victim Zhang to suffer a comminuted nasal fracture, fractures of the fourth and sixth ribs on the left side, dislocation of the right shoulder joint, and a fracture at the base of the fifth metatarsal bone of the right foot. After identification, the injuries to victim Zhang’s nose, right shoulder, and ribs were determined to be minor injuries, and the injury to the right foot was determined to be a slight injury. Defendants Sun and Tang voluntarily turned themselves into the police on December 30, 2013, and February 10, 2014, respectively, and truthfully confessed all criminal facts. Through mediation presided over by the court, defendants Sun and Tang reached an agreement with victim Zhang regarding civil compensation, paying Zhang 80,000 yuan and 95,000 yuan respectively, obtaining victim Zhang's understanding. The above facts were acknowledged by defendants Sun and Tang during the trial, and corroborated by written evidence such as the mediation agreement, receipts, understanding letter, testimony from witnesses Tian, Zuo, Li, Hou, and others, victim Zhang's statement, Forensic Medical Identification Certificate of Human Injury Degree No. 010 (2014) issued by the Criminal Technology Department of a certain county Public Security Bureau (Feng), Forensic Medical Identification Certificate of Human Injury Degree No. 98 (2014) issued by Xuzhou Public Security Bureau Forensic Unit (Xu), case initiation and detection report, the process of arriving at the case, identification records, on-site surveillance video, and defendants Sun and Tang's household registration certificates, which are sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Tang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between January 2013 and April 2015, the defendant Yi, during the production and sale of health supplements, knowingly added and packaged sildenafil (commonly known as Viagra powder), a substance explicitly prohibited for addition to health supplements by the state. Yi sold these products under names such as \"Germany Enlarging Pills,\" \"Golden Viagra,\" and \"Unyielding Gold Spear,\" and on nine occasions, sold various aphrodisiac health supplements via logistics to the defendant Xie, with total sales amounting to 28,520 RMB, from which she earned over 9,500 RMB in profit. Defendant Xie, knowing that the aphrodisiac health supplements purchased from defendant Yi contained sildenafil, continued to sell them to individuals such as Zhu, Ni, Shu, Hu, Zhou, and Duan, with total sales amounting to 8,730 RMB, from which she earned over 3,000 RMB in profit. On June 4, 2015, the public security organs captured the defendant Yi in a certain city and confiscated a sealing machine and a coding machine used in the crime, as well as various health supplements and other items. Upon examination, all confiscated health supplements were found to contain sildenafil. The defendants Yi and Xie and their defense had no objections to these facts during the court proceedings, and there are witness testimonies from Lu, Zhang, Yang, Li, Zhu, Ni, Shu, Hu, Zhou, Duan, and others, along with logistics consignment notes, bank account transaction details, records and lists of seized items, sampling records, lists and test reports, identification records, and the course of the criminal case investigation, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts. Regarding the prosecutor’s allegation that \"in May 2014, the defendant Yi sold aphrodisiac health supplements containing sildenafil to Xie for over 2,600 RMB,\" upon investigation, both defendants Yi and Xie stated that the payment was made through bank transfer, and then Yi mailed the health supplements to Xie through logistics. However, the prosecutor's provided bank transfer details between the parties lack any record of this transaction, and there is also an absence of other evidence to support the factuality of this charge, hence the court does not uphold this particular charge.", "label": {"Yi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain local People's Procuratorate charges: From late February 2019 to early June of the same year, the defendants Yan and Zhu, after premeditating, established a mahjong gambling group on the social software \"Xianliao\". They organized group members to gamble by playing mahjong in the \"Star Mahjong\" app's friend circle room and took a commission of 5 or 10 RMB per game, illegally profiting approximately 100,000 RMB. On September 12 of the same year, the defendants Yan and Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The evidence supporting the charges includes documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions and defenses, extraction records, and identification records.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On August 19, 2011, the defendant Shi, taking advantage of his position as a material handler at a city's Jianghe Curtain Wall Company, prepared a clearance slip under the pretext of selling scrap materials. The defendant Sun used this clearance slip to sell 78 sets of M48*185 cap bolts, which were stored in the company's warehouse on the seventh floor of the Gaode Land Plaza in Zhujiang New Town of the city, as scrap materials, obtaining a profit of 6,000 RMB. On August 20, 2011, Shi and Sun were apprehended and brought to justice. From Liu, who purchased the scrap materials, 78 sets of cap bolts were recovered as stolen goods, and 6,000 RMB in illicit proceeds were recovered from Lei.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At approximately 1 a.m. on October 17, 2019, after prior planning by defendants Song, Meng, on a grass lawn on the west bank of the Tuhai River in the eastern part of Dongchangfu District, in a certain city, defendant Meng restrained the victim Yao (female, ID number: 371525200628) by controlling her hands with his hands and legs. To prevent Yao from calling for help, Meng covered her mouth with his hand, and defendant Song forcibly engaged in sexual intercourse with victim Yao.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 21:00 on October 28, 2013, the defendant Yang received a call from Mi to purchase 200 yuan worth of drugs while Yang was gambling with the defendant Liu and others. They agreed to conduct the transaction at Yang's residence located at a specified location in a certain district of a city. Subsequently, defendant Liu was responsible for going out to purchase the drugs and returning to the said address to hand them over to Mi. Mi then gave the 200 yuan in drug money to defendant Yang, who in turn gave it to defendant Liu. After the transaction was completed, Mi was apprehended by the police as he was leaving the scene. The police confiscated a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.28 grams from Mi. Later, the police arrived at the aforementioned location and arrested defendants Liu and Yang, confiscating a small packet of methamphetamine weighing 0.53 grams, a mobile phone used for drug trafficking, and 200 yuan in drug money from defendant Liu; and confiscating a mobile phone used for drug trafficking from defendant Yang. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yang and Liu during the court hearing. They were corroborated by witness Mi's testimony and identification record, witness Huang's testimony and identification photos, the arrest process, search record, inspection record, seizure record and list, physical evidence photos, criminal test report, mobile phone call records, household registration proof, prior criminal records, and the confessions and identification records of defendants Yang and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The Third District People's Procuratorate of [City] charged that at approximately 2:00 AM on July 20, 2014, the defendants Dong and Wang, after planning in advance, entered the administrative department of Jia Chang Toy Factory at No. 67, Qiao Jiao East Road, Qiao Long Community, [Town], [City], and stole three computer mainframes, two monitors, and an oscilloscope belonging to the victim unit, Dongguan Nuohua Logistics Co., Ltd., with a total value of 4813.47 RMB, before fleeing the scene. In the afternoon of the same day, Wang sold one of the computer mainframes and a monitor for 600 RMB to a pawnshop in the area. On the 21st, the public security organs recovered the stolen goods from the pawnshop. Dong, fearing responsibility, returned the remaining stolen goods and fled with Wang to evade capture. On November 15 and 23, 2014, the public security organs apprehended defendants Dong and Wang, who were detained for drug use, at a detention center in [City]. After the case was solved, the stolen goods involved were returned to the victim unit. The prosecution provided evidence including on-site investigation records, site diagrams and photographs, an assessment opinion on the value of the involved property, the process of getting the suspects, permanent resident information, a seizure list, a list of received evidence materials, a restitution list, the business license of the corporate legal entity, a list of property losses, interrogation videos, site identification videos, testimonies and identification transcripts from witnesses Yang Jia, E, Yang Yi, and statements from the victim unit's employee Yan Yong. The confessions of the defendants Dong and Wang were also included. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Dong and Wang constitute the crime of theft. Considering that Dong and Wang confessed their crimes truthfully after being brought to justice, it is recommended that this court sentence them to imprisonment for six months to one year and six months, and impose a fine. Defendants Dong and Wang raised no objections to the facts, charges, or sentencing recommendations put forth by the prosecution and did not present any defense. Upon trial, it was found that the facts charged by the prosecution against defendants Dong and Wang for the crime of theft were clear, and the evidence was indeed sufficient; this court hereby confirms these findings.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Kecheng District, a certain city, charged that at around 23:00 on September 9, 2012, defendants Wei and Zhang, along with friends, were drinking at the Zuimei Bar on Sanqu Road in a certain city. The victim, Cheng, accidentally knocked over defendant Wei's beer while dancing, leading to an argument between Wei and Cheng. Defendant Wei then called defendant Zhang over, and together they assaulted the victim, Cheng. During the altercation, defendant Wei struck Cheng on the head with an empty beer bottle, and defendant Zhang kicked Cheng in the back, causing injuries to Cheng. Subsequently, the defendants fled the scene. According to the medical examination, Cheng suffered an epidural hematoma and a linear fracture on the right side of the temporal and parietal regions due to a head injury, which constituted serious injury. During the trial, both defendants did not dispute the aforementioned facts. The facts are also supported by evidence including the defendants' household registration documents; the victim Cheng’s statement and outpatient medical records, surgical records (copies), and photos of the injuries; testimonies from witnesses Xu, Weng, Jiang, Yuan, Chi, Ye, Li, and Wei; identification records, a photo list of the identified persons, and identity statements of the identified persons; a forensic medical assessment of the extent of human injury from the City Public Security Bureau physical evidence identification office; the notification of expert opinion; receipts; a reconciliation agreement; a letter of understanding; arrest details; confessions from defendants Wei and Zhang; a site inspection transcript, site sketches, site photos; surveillance video discs, etc., which are sufficient to establish the facts. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Wei paid the victim 80,000 yuan in compensation and reached a settlement agreement with the victim and his family. The victim and his family provided a letter of forgiveness for defendant Wei.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on May 24, 2016, at approximately 1:00 PM, defendant Zhang saw Han, with whom defendant Zhao had previously had a dispute, near the Wusi Roundabout in Bincheng District, a certain city. Zhang then called Zhao, and the two drove a small car with the license plate LuM××××× to chase the victim Han's vehicle southward along National Highway 205 from the vicinity of the Wusi Roundabout. They stopped Han's vehicle 300 meters south of the traffic light intersection in a certain village, a certain town, a certain county. Afterward, defendants Zhao and Zhang got out of the car, and defendant Zhang injured the victim Han in the face. Later, a forensic evaluation determined that Han's injuries were minor of the second degree. On July 7, 2016, defendants Zhao and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. On July 14, the defendants' families reached a compensation agreement with the victim Han, compensated for the damages, and obtained understanding. The People's Procuratorate of a certain county believes that defendants Zhao and Zhang arbitrarily assaulted others, with egregious circumstances, and their actions constituted the crime of x, which should be punished in accordance with item (i) of article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Zhang during the trial. There is sufficient evidence to confirm this, including documentary evidence such as household registration proof, the compensation agreement, receipt, and photos of the scene; statements from the victim Han; confessions from defendants Zhao and Zhang; forensic opinion (Bo) Gong (Xing) Jian (Fa) Zi [2016] No. 0076 body injury evaluation report; as well as case acceptance registration form, police reception and handling registration form, and explanation of the case situation.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that from April to August 2019, the defendants Yao and Zhang, for the purpose of making profits, organized gambling sessions using a certain poker game method multiple times and extracted profits at the VR Board Game Store at First Floor Street in Jingkou District and Room 1004, Jinyuan Building at 256 Liberation Road in this city. They illegally gained more than 50,000 yuan. On August 9, 2019, the defendant Yao was arrested by the police. On November 22, 2019, after receiving a phone notification, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the incident, the illegal gains of 50,562 yuan have been recovered. It was further found that the defendants Yao and Zhang voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. The prosecution recommended sentencing Yao to one year of imprisonment (with a one-year probation if probation conditions are met) and a fine of 25,000 yuan; and Zhang to one year of imprisonment (with a one-year probation if probation conditions are met) and a fine of 25,000 yuan. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Yao and Zhang during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Wei, and others, the process of arrest, seizure decision, seizure list, WeChat chat transfer records, and the search record produced by the Jingkou Branch of Zhenjiang Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city charged: On August 24, 2019, at around 2 a.m., at \"a certain bar\" on a certain street in a district of a certain city, the defendant Liu had a dispute with the victim Guo over trivial matters. The defendants Liu and Zhang conspired to assault the victims Guo and Song and waited near the bar. Subsequently, the defendants Liu and Zhang used bricks to assault the victims Guo and Song, causing injuries to both. According to the appraisal, the injuries of Guo and Song were minor. The defense counsel for the defendant Liu argued: 1. The defendant Liu has circumstances of voluntary surrender; 2. The family of the defendant Liu compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. In summary, it is suggested that probation be applied. The defense counsel for the defendant Zhang argued: 1. The defendant Zhang has circumstances of voluntary surrender; 2. The family of the defendant Zhang compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. In summary, it is suggested that probation be applied. After trial, it was found that the facts of the crime charged by the People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city are true. It was also found that the case was reported by the victim, and the defendants Liu and Zhang both voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime. The families of the defendants Liu and Zhang compensated the victims for their losses and obtained the victims' understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Liu and Zhang during the court trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the letters of understanding, victim statements, defendant confessions, appraisal opinions, and identification records, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Yuhang District in a certain city charged that between the night of October 2, 2015, and the early morning of the next day, the defendants Dai and Sun entered Hangzhou Maichuan Technology Co., Ltd., located at X Futai Road, Zhongtai Street, Yuhang District, a certain city, by prying open the door. They stole 312 yuan in cash, 4 boxes of tin strips, 3 laptops, 3 computer hard drives, 3 optical modems, 2 switches, 2 mice, 1 router, 1 surveillance host, 1 computer mainframe, 1 telecommunication switchboard, and 92 spare keys. According to the appraisal, some of the stolen goods (4 boxes of tin strips, 1 Dell laptop, 3 computer hard drives, 3 optical modems, 2 switches, 2 mice, 1 router, and 1 surveillance host) were valued at 16,186.75 yuan, including the Dell laptop valued at 500 yuan. After the incident, the stolen Dell laptop was recovered and returned to the victimized unit.", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that in early December 2015, the defendants Gong and Tu engaged together in the business of trading virtual game currency for \"Chenlong Online Game\" at their home, located at Unit 2, Room 301, Building 8, Youth Community, Chengdong Street, District A, City B. Both Gong and Tu were fully aware that the game coins sold online by an individual known as \"Potato\" (handled in a separate case) were illicitly obtained by hacking into other people's game accounts and were therefore illegal \"black points.\" Despite this knowledge, they still purchased them at prices below the regular market rate and resold them at higher prices to other game players. Gong and Tu took turns operating the computer each day to conduct business, using Tu's Alipay account to transfer funds to the Alipay account of the individual known as \"Potato\" to pay for the unlawful game coins. It was found that from December 22, 2015, to January 1, 2016, Gong and Tu transferred a total of 32,667 RMB to \"Potato\" to acquire these illegally-sourced game coins. On June 16, 2016, the defendants Gong and Tu were summoned by the police at Gong’s residence and brought to justice. They subsequently truthfully confessed the main facts of the case. After the incident, defendant Gong surrendered 33,000 RMB to the police. These aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gong and Tu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimony of witnesses \"Yin1,\" \"Yin2,\" and Qin, on-site transcripts, seizure orders and lists, Alipay account transaction records, Alipay record extracts, the process of being brought to justice, as well as personal information, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Gong and Tu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that at around 12:00 on October 28, 2017, defendants Shen and Wang committed theft of a VIVO bar phone model Y67 from the jacket pocket of Hao at the market on Fangshe Road in a certain city. The City Price Authentication Center evaluated the value of the stolen phone to be 909 yuan. The stolen item has been returned to the owner. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial process, and are supported by the victim Hao's statement; testimonies of witnesses Wang, Zhang1, and Zhang2; identification records and photos; site map; case notes; on-site inspection records; telecommunications records from Sanlian Communications; evidence receipt list; list of seized and returned items; arrest records; social investigation; defendants' confessions and their household registration documents, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Shen": ["Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In the early morning of November 10, 2013, defendants Zhang and Wang, after prior discussion, rode a motor-assisted bicycle to the Xiangti Villa residential area in Pukou Street, Shengzhou City. Defendant Wang was responsible for keeping watch and providing assistance, while defendant Zhang climbed through the window into Unit 1, Room 302 of Building 53, the home of Xu, and stole 300 yuan in cash and a Samsung 9220 mobile phone. They then used a key to enter Unit 1, Room 802 of Building 52, the home of Zhu, and stole a black Acer laptop. The total value of the stolen property amounted to 2,280 yuan. After the incident, Shengzhou City Public Security Bureau seized a motor-assisted bicycle from defendant Zhang and an Acer laptop from defendant Wang, both of which have been returned to the victims. The motor-assisted bicycle is currently temporarily held at the Shengzhou City Public Security Bureau. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Wang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of victims Xu and Zhu, identification records, purchase receipts, on-site investigation records, seizure lists, return lists, arrest details, residence registration certificates, and other evidence sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of Hangzhou City charges that in May and June 2016, the defendants Liang, Liu, and Li, along with Zhou (handled in a separate case), conspired to defraud the victim, Zhu 3, by setting up a gambling scam and planned to increase Zhu 3's desire to gamble by \"drugging\" him. Subsequently, defendant Liu recruited defendant Zhang to pose as a participant in the gambling game; defendant Li, together with Zhou and others, purchased and prepared psychotropic drugs and enlisted defendant Xu to partake in the gambling scam, facilitating the acquaintance of defendant Xu and victim Zhu 3 through SMS and WeChat, orchestrated by defendant Liu. On the evening of June 6, 2016, defendants Liang and Liu brought victim Zhu 3 to Box X in a certain restaurant in a town of the district, where defendants Liu, Liang, and Xu dined with him. During the meal, defendant Liang took the opportunity when victim Zhu 3 left the table to pour pre-prepared psychotropic drugs into Zhu 3's wine glass, causing him to ingest it. After the meal, defendants Liang and others took victim Zhu 3 to Box X in a chess and card room on Tangxi Road in the town, which Zhou and others had arranged beforehand. Defendants Liang, Liu, Li, Zhang, Xu, and Zhou collaborated to scam victim Zhu 3 through fraudulent gambling, resulting in Zhu 3 being deceived out of 4,800 RMB in cash and writing IOUs of 60,000 RMB and 70,000 RMB to Liang and Zhou, respectively. Afterward, the defendants, including Liang, repeatedly attempted to collect the amounts stated in the IOUs from victim Zhu 3 through phone calls, which were unsuccessful due to victim Zhu 3 filing a report. The evidence supporting the charges includes the victim's statement; documentary evidence such as household registration certificates, criminal judgments, and bank statements; forensic toxicology examination reports; records of evidence retrieval; confessions and defenses of the defendants, among others.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Through the trial, it was found: On September 12, 2012, at around 21:00, the defendants Sun and Yan, after drinking, intended to visit Wang Wei for recreation. When the two arrived at the entrance of Wang Wei's residence in a certain village, town, city, they encountered villagers Wang and Wang Jia, who came to look after Wang Wei's house. Subsequently, the defendants, Sun and Yan, unreasonably assaulted Wang and Wang Jia. As a result, Wang suffered a fracture of the left nasal bone and a fracture of the posterior lateral wall of the left maxillary sinus. According to forensic identification, the injury to Wang's left orbital area was classified as minor injury. After the incident, the defendants Sun and Yan were arrested and brought to justice by police officers from a city's Public Security Bureau on September 24, 2012. During the trial of this case, the two defendants reached an agreement on civil compensation with the civil plaintiffs Wang and Wang Jia. The above facts are corrobor", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Yan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, the court found: 1. On June 28, 2014, at around 11 p.m., defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang, together with \"A Moumou\" (pending separate trial), went to the intersection of 187 Xiabang North Road, Nanbaixiang Street, Ouhai District, in a certain city and stole a a××××× Jinbei van (valued at 38,000 yuan) belonging to Jiang Province Telecommunication Engineering Construction Co., Ltd. 2. In the early hours of July 3, 2014, defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang, together with \"A Moumou\" (pending separate trial), drove a a××××× Jinbei van to 98 Ruilong South Road, Haicheng Street, Longwan District, in a certain city and stole 27 bags of hardware products (worth a total of 14,500 yuan). After the incident, the public security authorities recovered the above-mentioned property and returned it to the respective victims. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Zhou, Wang, Fang during the court hearing and are corroborated by the testimony of victim Huang Mouyi, witness testimonies of Mao Mou and Huang Moujia, identification records and photographs, inspection records and photographs, seizure and return lists, the price appraisal report, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release upon completion of sentence, the administrative penalty decision, the arrest process, and demographic information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Shanxi Province charged: On the night of November 22, 2018, at 11 PM, Zhao Moujia, Wen Mouyi, Zhao Mouding, Zhao Moubing, and Zhao Mouyi were singing in a room at True Love KTV at the foot of the Drum Tower in the city. During their singing, Zhao Moujia and Wen Mouyi saw Tian Moujia singing in the adjacent room. After Tian Moujia left the room, they exchanged a few words before returning to their respective rooms to continue singing. Subsequently, Tian Moujia brought beer to drink with Wen Mouyi and others, leading to a dispute between the parties. Tian Moujia's sister, Duan, came into the room where Wen Mouyi and others were present. Duan smashed a tea table glass with a beer bottle in the room and assaulted and continuously insulted Wen Mouyi, Zhao Mouding, and Zhao Moubing. Duan's husband, Yan, then entered the room and insulted Wen Mouyi and others, and also physically assaulted Wen Mouyi and Zhao Moubing. Duan and Yan blocked the doo", "label": {"Duan": ["Imprisonment"], "Yan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that between June 14 and June 25, 2014, the defendants Chen and Ying, after prior consultation, acted as agents for the gambling website \"http://hg6610.com\" in a certain city. Defendant Ying accepted bets from individuals such as Huang Jia, Huang Yi, and Wang, while defendant Chen placed bets on the gambling website, engaging in betting on soccer matches for gambling, with a total of over RMB 229,000 received in gambling funds from others and illegal gains amounting to over RMB 8,000. On August 20, 2014, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Sanjiang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed his crimes. After the incident, the public security organs seized RMB 4,000 each from defendants Ying and Chen and one mobile phone each from participants Ying, Wang, Gong, Zhang, Huang Yi, Shen, Huang Jia, Yao, and Zhou. The seized money and items are currently held by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ying and Chen during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Huang Jia, Wang, Zhang, Huang Yi, Yao, Zhou, Shen, Gong, Zhu, Qian, the electronic evidence inspection work record produced by the Cyber Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, assistance in inquiry of property notices, bank statement lists, seizure decision and list from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city dated December 11, 2014, showing RMB 4,000 each seized from defendants Ying and Chen, seizure decision and list showing one mobile phone each seized from Ying, Wang, Gong, Zhang, Huang Yi, Shen, Huang Jia, Yao, and Zhou by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the criminal judgment No. 10 (2002) Sheng Xing Chu Zi issued by this court, defendant Chen’s interrogation record at the Sanjiang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city on August 20, 2014, the arrest process, and the household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ying": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in December 2018, the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang reached an agreement for Zhou to organize gambling in the form of \"Zha Jin Hua\" at the venue operated by Ma and Zhang in a certain district of the city. Afterwards, Zhou, Ma, and Zhang would distribute the gambling proceeds among themselves. Investigation revealed that from the end of 2018 to January 2019, Zhou organized gambling activities with Zhang, Zhang, Li, Chen, Ma, and others on multiple occasions. Zhou's total gain from the gambling activities amounted to over 5,000 yuan, while Ma and Zhang each received over 700 yuan. On January 14, 2019, investigators from a district branch of the Urumqi Public Security Bureau conducted a lawful inspection of a poker room located at *** Wenquan West Road, *** in a certain district of the city, where they apprehended the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang and seized gambling funds totaling 27,000 yuan, three decks of poker cards, and one mahjong set, with Zhou accruing 1,500 yuan in gambling proceeds. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang during the trial proceedings, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Zuo, Ha, Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang, Ma, Wang, Li, Li, Wang, identification photos, onsite photos, inventory of seized items (documents), inventory of confiscated goods, administrative penalty decision, general payment slip for non-tax revenue in a specific district, rental contract, inspection notes, electronic evidence inspection records, case arrival report, and identity documents of the defendants Zhou, Ma, and Zhang. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it has been found that on August 18, 2014, at around 11 PM, the defendants Guo and Cao were drinking with friends at the \"Door\" bar in Diamond Plaza, Haibowan District. They encountered the victim Shan, who was also drinking at the same bar. Due to a verbal altercation that occurred under the influence of alcohol, a dispute arose, and subsequently, Shan was injured by Guo and Cao. According to the assessment by Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute, the degree of injury suffered by the victim Shan was classified as minor injury level two. After the incident, the two defendants actively compensated the victim for economic losses totaling 100,000 yuan, and received forgiveness from Shan. It is recommended that the court impose a lenient punishment on the two defendants. The above facts are not disputed by the defendants Guo and Cao during the trial, and they are substantiated by the victim Shan's report and statements; the confessions of the defendants; testimonies from witnesses Zhao, Li, Xiao, and others; documentary evidence such as basic personal information; the injury assessment opinion from Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute; audio-visual materials; and evidence such as the mediation agreement, receipt, and letter of forgiveness, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Guo": [], "Cao": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that in November 2013, the defendant Ji, together with He (handled in a separate case), after prior discussion, jointly undertook the project of transporting circular machines from a certain village in Huashi Street, a certain district, a certain city to Zhejiang Henglong Aramid Technology Co., Ltd. in a certain bridge economic development zone. On the morning of December 25, 2013, the defendant Ji, without formulating a hoisting operation plan and without assigning personnel for on-site command, instructed the defendant Wang to carry out hoisting operations within Zhejiang Henglong Aramid Technology Co., Ltd. The defendant Wang, despite being aware of the safety hazards in the hoisting operations and in the absence of personnel command, still proceeded with the operation in violation of regulations. Later, during the process of transporting the circular machines, due to the basket swinging, tilting, and rotating, Huang, Jiang, Lin, Fan, Yuan, and Wang A6 fell through the gap between the swinging basket and the third-floor landing joint, resulting in the death of Huang, Jiang, Lin, Fan, Yuan, and injury to Wang A. After the incident, the defendant Ji voluntarily surrendered and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. To prove the facts of the charges, the public prosecutor presented relevant evidence in court.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on March 24, 2014, at approximately 12:30 PM, the defendants Sun and Li entered Room 602 at No. 74 Taiping Lane Community, Chengxiang Street, Xiaoshan District, of a certain city, and stole a OPPO brand mobile phone and a phone case belonging to the victim Wang, valued at 2,162 yuan. After the incident, the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Li during the court hearing. The evidence includes the victim Wang's statement, testimonies from witnesses Yao, Xia, and Jian, the identification record, the on-site investigation record, the price appraisal conclusion, the list of seized items and photographs, the list of returned items, the list of confiscated items, the destruction list, the announcement, the house rental contract, criminal files, the community drug rehabilitation order, the public security administrative punishment order, the compulsory drug rehabilitation order, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the account of the incident, the situation explanation, the health and injury inspection registration forms upon admission, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Sun and Li, all of which are sufficient to establish the conclusion.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charges that starting from November 2014, the defendant company, Yueqing Dongfeng Spring Manufacturing Co., Ltd., under the management and operation of the defendant Zhu, established a cleaning workshop within the company without approval from the environmental protection department. In this workshop, workers, including the defendant Wu, were arranged to use cleaning agents to wash stainless steel springs, and the wastewater from the cleaning process was directly discharged into the toilet sewer. The defendant Fu, a pipe worker for the company, directly managed the cleaning workshop. On April 2, 2015, this cleaning workshop was caught by the Yueqing Environmental Protection Bureau. According to the monitoring by the Yueqing Environmental Monitoring Station, the heavy metal zinc content in the sewage from the company's workshop restroom was 49.1mg/L (standard limit 5.0mg/L), and the heavy metal nickel content was 12.6mg/L (standard limit 1.0mg/L), both exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department has agreed to this test. It was further found that on April 3, 2015, the defendants Zhu and Fu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to their criminal conduct. During the court trial, defendants Zhu, Fu, and Wu had no objection to the aforementioned facts. The facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhi, Lian, and Nan, business licenses, agreement documents, records of the case process, monitoring reports and approval opinions, on-site inspection records, identification records, proof of prior convictions, household registration information, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at approximately 23:30 on November 22, 2013, defendants He, Ma, Li, and He's friend named Li were in the same car. When the vehicle stopped at a traffic light at the northeast corner intersection of Diamond Plaza in Haibowan District, it encountered the taxi in which victim Gu was riding. Gu rolled down the car window and, upon seeing Li, made a \"non-normative\" remark. He wanted to beat Gu. The two cars stopped near Dongfanghong English School in Wuhai City, where the three defendants exited their vehicle and assaulted Gu, causing injuries to his head. According to the Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute, Gu's injuries were classified as minor. During the trial, victim Gu filed an incidental civil lawsuit in this court. Through mediation presided over by the court, the three defendants and victim Gu reached a civil mediation agreement, whereby the three defendants jointly compensated Gu for various economic losses totaling 45,000 yuan. Gu expressed understanding towards the three defendants and suggested the court impose a lenient sentence. It was also found that on March 4, 2015, defendant He was convicted of drug trafficking by the People's Court of Haibowan District, Wuhai City, and sentenced to four years of imprisonment with a fine of 2,500 yuan. The sentence was from July 8, 2014, to July 7, 2018. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the three defendants during the court hearing, and were corroborated by the prosecution's presentation of evidence such as the arrest process, defendants' basic information, inquiry into defendants' criminal records, Wuhai People's Hospital medical certificate, criminal judgment, etc.; Gu's report and statement; testimonies of witnesses Li, Lu, Zhang Yuyu, Wang Dong, Zhao Huahua, and Man; defendants He, Ma, Li's confessions; the Wuhai City Zhongheng Judicial Appraisal Institute's opinion on the degree of bodily injury; and the written records of the three defendants identifying the crime scene, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"He": ["Detention"], "Ma": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on July 12, 2019, the defendants Tan and Li discussed and subsequently stole the remaining copper core cables from the construction site of the Lianjie Street Station of Kunming Metro Line 4, where they worked. Afterwards, they sold the stolen goods. According to the appraisal, the stolen cables contained 175.39 kilograms of copper core, with a total value of 5,610 RMB.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that the defendant He, due to a debt dispute with Wang, commissioned the defendants Ming and others to help him collect the debt. At around 9 p.m. on July 23, 2016, the defendant Ming, together with the defendant Xu, Feng (handled in a separate case), and others, went to Wang’s residence at apartment 401, building 37, unit 1, No. 10 Changchun Road, in a certain district of a certain city, and invited defendants Lu, Zhang, and Wei to come and help collect the debt. The defendant Ming also notified the defendant He to arrive at the scene. In Wang’s home, the defendant He and Ming demanded that Wang repay the money. The defendant Zhang hit Wang on the head with his hand. When Wang tried to hide in the bedroom to call the police with his mobile phone, Feng kicked open the bedroom door and grabbed Wang's phone. He, Ming, and others continued to force Wang to pay back the money. When the attempt to collect the debt failed, the aforementioned individuals drove Wang to the edge of a construction site at Hancheng Auto Park in a certain city, forced Wang to take off his clothes, and assaulted him, demanding repayment. The defendant Wei kicked Wang on the lower left side of his waist, causing three of Wang's ribs to fracture. Subsequently, defendants He, Ming, Lu, Zhang, and Wei took Wang to room 8232 of Baian Hotel in Maojian District, where Xu and Feng watched over him, preventing him from leaving. At around 6 a.m. on July 24, Wang escaped from the hotel while Xu ", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Ming": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Detention"], "Xu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: One day at the end of January 2016, defendant Ge proposed that a television set was needed. After discussing with Li, the two went to the victim Ji's residence (a rented room on the second floor of \"a certain restaurant\") on the west side of a certain street in a town in this city. They took advantage of an opportunity to sneak in and stole a Sanyo brand LCD television set from Ji's room, which Ge took home for use. According to assessment, the TV set was valued at 400 yuan. It was also found that defendants Ge and Li were apprehended by the police after the victim Ji reported the case. After being brought to justice, the two defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts and returned the television to the victim Ji. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Ge and Li during the trial and were corroborated by the victim Ji's statement, witness Qiao's testimony, on-site inspection records, transcripts of crime scene identification, a price appraisal opinion, and case registration form, the case resolution process, an administrative penalty decision, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ge": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused that, between April and July 2014, Zhang, Chen, Chen (all already sentenced), and Chen B (dealt with in a separate case) operated a casino for profit in various villages of this county. They repeatedly organized gatherings for over thirty people, including Liu C, Guo, and Xia A, to gamble in the form of domino Pai Gow, and extracted commissions from the winnings. During this period, defendants Guo and Xia repeatedly transported gamblers to the casino. On July 1, 2014, the Wencheng County Public Security Bureau set up a checkpoint on the road from one town's village to another and apprehended more than twenty gamblers, and seized gambling funds totaling over 70,000 RMB. On September 1, 2014, defendant Guo was arrested by police on Daqiao Road in a town within the county, and on October 30 of the same year, defendant Xia was arrested by police in a village within the county. The prosecution presented the following evidence in court: household registration certificates, proof of verification of criminal records, criminal judgments, and administrative penalty decisions as documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Liu A, Liu B, Lin, Huang A, Zhou, Wu, Cai, Pan, Lei, Dong, Liu A, Liu B, Liu C, Ye, Liu C, Guo, Huang, and others; confessions and defenses of defendants Guo, Xia, and co-defendants Zhang A, Chen A, Chen C, Chen B; and identification transcripts, among other evidence.", "label": {"Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of August 12, 2015, defendants Lu, Gu, and Xiong went to No. 57, Liucitangbei, Liandu District, a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Gu acted as lookouts at the door while defendant Lu entered room 102, where the victim Li lived, and stole one \"Xiaomi\" mobile phone (worth 240 RMB) and one Vivo mobile phone (worth 770 RMB). Subsequently, defendant Lu entered room 202, where the victim Zhang lived, and stole one \"Apple\" 5C mobile phone (worth 1940 RMB), and a wallet containing 300 RMB. 2. In the early morning of August 12, 2015, defendants Lu, Gu, and Xiong went to No. 66, Guishan Road, Liandu District, a certain city. Defendants Xiong and Gu acted as lookouts at the door while defendant Lu entered the victim Wang’s room to steal. However, he was caught in the act by the victim and then fled the scene. After the crime, the stolen property was recovered and returned to the victims. The actions of defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu violated the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, constituting the crime of X. Defendants Lu and Xiong are recidivists, and in the second criminal fact charged in the indictment, defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu were involved in an attempted crime. It is requested that they be sentenced according to the law. The above facts are without objection from defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu during the trial, and are corroborated by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and cross-examined in court: 1. Proof of household registration; 2. Statements from defendants Lu, Xiong, and Gu; 3. Statements from victims Zhang, Li, and Wang; 4. Testimony of witness Chen; 5. Identification records, search records and photos, on-site identification records and photos, on-site inspection records and photos; 6. Price appraisal report; 7. Evidence receipt list and mobile phone invoices; 8. Details of arrest; 9. Criminal judgment; 10. Detainment decision and inventory, return inventory, hotel industry system query result list, etc. The evidence is indeed sufficient and adequate for conviction.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial proceedings, it was established that the defendants, Li and Xiao, while serving as the Party Branch Secretary and Director of the Village Committee and as a Village Committee member and accountant respectively in a certain village in a certain city, took advantage of their positions to embezzle national grain direct subsidy funds. Li, either alone or in collusion with other village committee members, conspired to misappropriate such funds on three occasions. Defendant Li committed the crime three times, misappropriating national grain direct subsidies totaling 10,780.12 yuan. Defendant Xiao committed the crime once, misappropriating 5,661.23 yuan. Before the case was uncovered, the defendants had returned 2,600 yuan of the grain direct subsidies to the Treasury Department of the city's Finance Bureau on June 13, 2011. After the case was discovered, the remaining embezzled funds were recovered and handed over to the national treasury by the procuratorate.\n\nSpecifically, Li, in April 2007 and April 2010, using his position, falsified claims of wheat planting areas of 17 acres and 37.01 acres respectively, embezzling grain direct subsidies of 1,475.26 yuan and 3,643.63 yuan, which he then illegally kept for himself. In April 2008, Li and Xiao, together with other village committee members, falsified claims of wheat planting areas totaling 67.42 acres, which allowed them to misappropriate and privately divide 5,661.23 yuan of national grain direct subsidy funds. Out of this amount, Li and Xiao respectively received 1,463.59 yuan and 1,116.80 yuan.\n\nThese facts were not contested by the two defendants during trial proceedings and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li Moumou, Zhang Moumou, Wan Moumou, Li Moujia and others; copies of the wheat subsidy forms, passbooks, and withdrawal receipts; evidence provided by the town's finance office; proof of farming areas supplied by the rural economic management bureau of the city; copies of the village committee's accounts; payment receipts and refund vouchers; employment certificates and household registration certificates of the two defendants. This evidence is sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiao": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on April 17, 2013, the defendant Ma, while setting up a stall to purchase antiques in a village in a certain county, discovered that the villager Du's home had a pair of ceramic ewers with handles. He then conspired with defendants Zhao and Liu to steal them, conducting a preliminary survey on the same day. On April 19, 2013, the three defendants took tools such as bolt cutters to a village in the county. Seizing the moment when Du's house was empty, defendant Ma acted as a lookout at the junction, while defendants Zhao and Liu cut open the lock on Du's house, entering and stealing a pair of ceramic ewers with handles, a pair of lidded ceramic jars, and a statue of a certain Chairman Mao. The three defendants later sold the stolen goods for a total of 6,000 yuan, and the illicit proceeds were evenly divided among them. According to the appraisal by the county's Price Certification Center, the ceramic ewers with handles were valued at 5,000 yuan, and the statue of Chairman Mao was valued at 900 yuan. With Du's consent, the pair of lidded ceramic jars was not appraised. After the crime, the public security authorities recovered the pair of ceramic ewers with handles and returned them to Du. After defendants Ma and Zhao were apprehended, Ma's family compensated Du with 4,000 yuan, and Zhao's family compensated him with 5,000 yuan, both obtaining Du's forgiveness. On November 18, 2013, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. During the trial in this court, defendant Liu compensated Du with 2,000 yuan, also obtaining Du's forgiveness. During the court hearing, defendants Ma, Zhao, and Liu raised no objections, and evidence such as the interrogation record of the victim Du; testimonies of witnesses Wang B and Wang A; on-site inspection records, site maps, and site photos; identification records and identification photos; price appraisal report; inventory of seized and returned items; letters and records of understanding; the capture records of defendants Ma and Zhao; the proof of voluntary surrender by defendant Liu; as well as the confessions of the three defendants sufficiently prove the charges.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Peng and Yang voluntarily confessed, admitted to the facts charged by the prosecution, and are willing to accept punishment. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Peng and Yang during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by the victim Chen's statement transcript, witness testimonies from Yang, Li, and others, receipt and letter of understanding provided by the victim, and the case-solving report issued by officers from Xuebu Police Station of the Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on July 15, 2015, police officers from the Xingning Branch of the Nanning Public Security Bureau, after receiving a report from the public, went to Room 2602, Building C, Jingrui Garden Community, Yongwu Road, Xingning District, Nanning, and uncovered a gambling venue using playing cards. At the scene, they arrested the defendant Tang and 25 gamblers including Pan, Huang B, and others. The defendant Shi was arrested near the Ruijing Garden. From the defendant Tang, police seized a deck of playing cards and gambling funds amounting to 2,100 RMB; from the defendant Shi, a walkie-talkie was seized. The defendant Tang was the dealer at the casino, while the defendant Shi was responsible for keeping watch. The above facts were not disputed by the defendant Tang and his defense lawyer during the hearing, and Tang voluntarily pleaded guilty in court. The defense counsel argued that Tang worked as a dealer to earn money to return home because he lost all his money gambling, and that Tang confessed his crimes truthfully upon being brought to justice, hoping for a lenient sentence. The defendant Shi also did not dispute the facts during the hearing and voluntarily pleaded guilty in court, arguing that he was a first-time offender and hoped for a lenient punishment. The facts ascertained through the trial, including the registration form of the case, details of the arrest, household registration certificate, list of seized items, testimonies of witnesses Liu, Huang A, Huang B, Wei, Wang, and Chen, the administrative penalty decision, identification transcript, scene identification transcript and photos, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Tang and Shi, are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate accused: 1. Around midnight on May 5, 2015, the defendant He, together with \"Little Moumou\" (handled in a separate case), stole one black Xiangsheng-brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Zhang Mouyi, and one blue Xiangsheng-brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Pei Mou. 2. From midnight to around 3 am on May 7, 2015, the defendants He, Sun, and Li Moumou (handled in a separate case) carried tools such as an \"L\" shaped socket and an iron tip, and committed theft three times in the Pingshan New District of Kengzi Street: stealing one light blue Lejiayuan-brand electric bicycle from the victim Yan Mou on Gongyuan Road, one white Xinyi-brand electric bicycle from the victim Zhai Mou on Zixing Road, and one purple Taishun-brand electric bicycle from the victim Zhou Mou on Shuangcheng Road. According to the appraisal by the Shenzhen Longgang District Price Authentication Center, the total value of the three stolen electric bicycles belonging to Yan Mou, Zhai Mou, and Zhou Mou was 1,400 RMB. The value of the stolen electric bicycles belonging to Zhang Mouyi and Pei Mou could not be determined. The defendant He, Sun raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, and the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Physical and documentary evidence: photos of the stolen electric bicycles, identity documents, capture process, criminal history comparison report; 2. Witness testimony: testimony of the witness Zhang Moujia; 3. Victim statements: statements from the victims Yan Mou, Zhai Mou, Zhou Mou, Zhang Mouyi, and Pei Mou; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants: confessions and defenses of the defendants He, Sun; 5. Appraisal opinion: conclusion report on the appraisal of the value of the property involved; 6. Records of inspection, examination, identification, and investigative experiments: crime scene inspection records and photos, identification records, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that Xiong (already sentenced), along with defendants Shen and Pan, conspired to illegally sell earthwork. Xiong was responsible for contacting Deng from Jiangxi Chengchi Company. Shen was responsible for counting vehicles at the theft site, while Pan was responsible for coordinating relationships with urban management and other parties. On August 21, 2016, at around 22:00, Xiong and Shen organized dump trucks and excavators to illegally excavate earthwork on the wasteland opposite the Agricultural University Technology Market, located on Lushan Middle Avenue in a certain Economic and Technological Development Zone, achieving approximately 63 truckloads. The stolen earthwork was transported to a certain High-tech Zone along the North Riverside Expressway site. On August 24, 2016, at approximately 22:00, Xiong and defendant Shen again organized vehicles to steal earthwork at the same location. After transporting about 32 truckloads of earthwork to the same High-tech Zone construction site, they were discovered and stopped by staff from the Agricultural University Security Office, who then reported the incident to the police. Testing determined that a total of 1,434.1 cubic meters of earthwork was stolen. An appraisal valued the stolen earthwork at 5,736 RMB. It was further uncovered that at 23:00 on August 24, defendant Shen voluntarily surrendered himself to the police station. On February 10, 2017, at 11:00 am, defendant Pan voluntarily reported to the police station to cooperate with the investigation after receiving a telephone summons from the police. These facts, which the two defendants did not dispute during the court proceedings, are corroborated by Xiong's confession, the report by Chen from the Jiangxi Agricultural University Security Office, testimonies from witnesses Zhang and Wan, the administrative penalty decision, the site inspection report, site photos, identification record, resident information form, arrest documentation, situation statement, letter of understanding, and valuation appraisal, providing ample evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Shen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Lin and Liu voluntarily plead guilty, acknowledge the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution agency, and are willing to accept punishment. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Lin and Liu during the court hearing and are sufficiently substantiated by the statements of victims Yin and Zhu, the testimonies of witnesses Zheng 1 and Zheng 2, identification records, transfer records, the seizure order and inventory, and the case investigation report provided by officers from the Xicheng Police Station of the Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in a certain province charged: On the afternoon of January 17, 2020, defendant Xia, during the process of selling waste cardboard to defendant Fan at his residence in Room 604, Building 4, Yongrun Garden, Nanfeng Town, a certain city, both defendants did not carefully observe the situation downstairs. They jointly threw the bundled cardboard directly from a location downstairs, causing injury to the victim, Yuan, who was passing by below. Yuan was subsequently pronounced dead on January 19, 2020, after unsuccessful rescue attempts. According to the appraisal, Yuan's condition was consistent with suffering from coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and sustaining head and chest injuries due to blunt external force, ultimately resulting in acute respiratory and circulatory failure. Both the trauma and the underlying disease were considered equal factors in the cause of death. After the incident, defendants Xia and Fan voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. They have compensated the victim's close relatives, who have expressed forgiveness. On December 28, 2020, defendants Xia and Fan voluntarily signed a confession and plea agreement in the presence of a duty lawyer, expressing their willingness to plead guilty. It is recommended that defendants Xia and Fan each be sentenced to one year of imprisonment with probation for the crime of [specific charge]. Defendants Xia and Fan have no objections to the charges, the crime, or the sentencing recommendations, and have signed to this effect. Testimonies from witnesses Gu, Bao, Ye, Zhang, Lu, Shen, and Xu, along with on-site inspection records, weighing records, relevant photos, retrieved medical records of the victim, forensic appraisal opinions from the Judicial Appraisal Center of Suzhou University and the Institute of Forensic Science, receipts, case and arrest reports, population information, investigation and assessment reports, confessions and identification records of defendants Xia and Fan, and other evidence, sufficiently establish the facts, which this court confirms.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that the defendants Wang and Yu seized other people's property of considerable value. Their actions respectively violate the provisions of Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for Crime X. Since both defendants are deaf and mute individuals committing crimes, Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China applies. Evidence such as documentary evidence, confessions from the defendants, statements from the victims, and witness testimonies were provided to substantiate the allegations. The defendants Wang and Yu do not object to the facts and charges presented by the prosecution. The defense's argument is that both defendants are deaf and mute, and both truthfully confessed their criminal acts after being captured and voluntarily pleaded guilty, requesting lenient punishment. After trial, it was found that on January 16, 2016, at about 13:30, the defendants Wang and Yu planned to seize after conspirating; in a village street in a town in a certain city, defendant Yu waited on a motorcycle to keep watch, and defendant Wang got off to snatch more than 5,300 yuan from Zhang. They later divided and squandered the spoils. It was also found that defendant Wang was arrested on March 2, 2016, and defendant Yu was arrested on March 7, 2016. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Yu during the trial. Furthermore, the facts are sufficiently supported by evidence presented and verified in court, such as the registration form of the case, the arrest details and explanation, the process of solving the case, victim Zhang's statement, the fingerprint identification report from the public security bureau, identification records and photos, deaf-mute test medical records, and household registration certificates, proving the fact that the defendants Wang and Yu committed Crime X. During the trial, regarding the sentencing facts and circumstances of the two defendants, the prosecution suggested that since the defendants voluntarily pleaded guilty in court and are both deaf and mute individuals committing crimes, they should be given a lighter punishment.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: 1. Between early August 2013 and August 15, 2013, defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia formed a group, with Zhong holding a 40% share, Chen holding a 40% share, and Xia holding a 20% share. They operated a casino for profit on the second floor of Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city, using the \"Flower Digging\" method. They gathered Zhu, Yan, Huang (the first), and others to gamble. During the operation of the casino, a total profit of more than 100,000 RMB was made from collecting fees from the dealers. 2. In early August 2013, defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia formed a group, in which Zhong held a 40% share, Chen held a 40% share, and Xia held a 20% share. They operated a casino for profit on the second floor of Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city, using the \"Thirteen Cards\" method. They gathered Xu, Ji, Zhu, and others to gamble. They made a profit of more than 10,000 RMB from collecting fees from the dealers. In the early morning of August 15, 2013, police officers from the police station of a certain town under the Wenling City Public Security Bureau arrested defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia at Villa No. 5, Block 3, Xintaixin Village, a certain town in this city. After being apprehended, all three defendants truthfully confessed their involvement in the case. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhong, Chen, and Xia during the court trial. Additionally, these facts are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu, Ji, Zhu, Huang (the first), Yan, Lin, Pan, Ruan, Luo, Hong, Teng, Di, and Huang (the second); inspection records; evidence preservation decisions; evidence preservation lists; the administrative punishment decision against Zhu and others; household registration certificates of the defendants; and the proof of the defendants' apprehension, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Gaocheng District in a certain city charges: Starting from May 2018, without the approval of the administrative authorities and without obtaining sand mining permits, Zhang (at large) and Jiang (at large) established a sand pit at a section of the Hutuo River, located 2 kilometers northwest of the sewage treatment plant in Gaocheng District. Ma (at large) set up a dry sand field in the old cement factory courtyard along Dongning Road, located westward from the sewage plant entrance in Gaocheng District. Defendants Zhang and Du were responsible for issuing invoices in the sand pit; defendant Yang operated Zhang's loader to dig and load sand in the pit; defendant Shen operated Ma's loader to load sand for purchasing vehicles at the dry sand field; defendants Xu, Zhao, Liu operated Ma's discarded dump truck to transport river sand from the sand pit to the dry sand field; defendant Nie operated his own discarded dump truck to transport river sand from the sand pit to the dry sand field. According to the survey conducted by Hebei Liyan Geological Exploration Technology Service Co., Ltd., a total of 12,540 cubic meters of construction-grade fine sand was extracted. As appraised by the price certification center of Gaocheng District in a certain city, the market price is 356,638 yuan.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Nie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 9 p.m. on July 26, 2014, defendants Qin and Zhang were involved in a dispute over clients for their respective small hotels, which led to a physical altercation in the hallway on the first floor of Unit 1, Building 19, Wansongyuan Community, a district in this city. During the conflict, defendant Qin used a machete to inflict injuries on defendant Zhang's face and arm, while defendant Zhang used a kitchen knife to inflict injuries on defendant Qin's shoulder and arm.\n\nThe Hubei Zhongzhen Forensic Identification Institute, entrusted by the public security authorities, issued a forensic opinion stating that defendant Zhang had multiple wounds on his face with a total length of more than 10 cm, had an external fixation with plaster on his left forearm, and his functional wound was not available for examination. The injury was classified as minor injury level one. Defendant Qin sustained a 3.2 cm wound on his left shoulder, an 8.9 cm wound on his left upper arm, and a 15.2 cm wound on his right upper arm. His injuries were classified as minor injury level two.\n\nAfter the incident, defendants Qin and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on August 27 of the same year. It was also found that after the incident, defendants Qin and Zhang had reached a mediation agreement regarding mutual civil compensation. Defendant Qin compensated defendant Zhang for economic losses totaling 20,000 RMB (already paid). Both defendants voluntarily waived their rights to pursue civil compensation from each other and expressed mutual understanding.\n\nThese facts were undisputed by the defendants during the trial. There is sufficient evidence to confirm these facts, including photos of the injuries, the compensation agreement, receipts, documentation of criminal understanding, basic population information, information from the national illegal and criminal personnel resource database inquiry, paperwork concerning the arrest and case resolution by public security authorities, witness testimonies from Xu and Zhang A, and forensic opinions.", "label": {"Qin": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charged that on May 23, 2014, at approximately 3:15 a.m., the victim, Sun Mouli, was riding a bicycle past the section in front of the village committee of Longgang Street in a certain district of a certain city when he was stopped by the defendants Xu and Bi. Xu, holding a wooden stick, threatened Sun Mouli, demanding that he hand over his money, and instructed Bi to search Sun Mouli. Upon seeing this, Sun Mouli resisted and then fled. A bicycle left at the scene by Sun Mouli (valued at 80 yuan according to appraisal) was taken by a friend of Xu and Bi, Wei Moumou. After the victim reported the incident, the public security authorities arrived at the scene and confiscated the bicycle, returning it to the victim, Sun Mouli. On May 23, 2014, the defendants Xu and Bi were arrested at their residence in a certain area of Tongle, a certain village, in a certain district. To verify the facts of the charges, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, appraisal opinions, records of inspections, examinations, identifications, investigation experiments, and audio-visual materials.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charged that on the evening of November 14, 2014, the defendant Zhu had a dispute with Zhang Jia over a trivial loan matter in a rental room near Chenghuang Temple in Juexi Street of a certain county, which was later stopped by others. Subsequently, the defendant Zhu, Zhang Jia, and Zhang Yi, among others, had another altercation and fight near the entrance of Chenghuang Temple in Juexi Street. Upon seeing this, the defendants Cai and Wang approached and joined the defendant Zhu in punching and kicking Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and others. Later, the defendants Zhu and Wang chased and beat Zhang Jia, Zhang Yi, and others with iron rods. The defendant Zhu used an iron rod to beat Zhang Yi, causing injuries to Zhang Yi. The appraisal showed that due to this injury, Zhang Yi suffered a fracture of the fourth metacarpal bone in his right hand, with dislocation of the fracture site (complete fracture), and the injury constituted a minor injury of the second degree. After arriving at the scene, the defendant Zhu truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. On January 29, 2015, the defendants Cai and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the county's public security bureau and both truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. After the incident, the defendant Zhu reached a settlement agreement with Zhang Yi regarding civil compensation. At present, the defendant Zhu has paid Zhang Yi 60,000 RMB in compensation as agreed in the settlement, and the defendants Zhu, Cai, and Wang have all received Zhang Yi's forgiveness. The above facts were not contested by the defendants Zhu, Cai, and Wang during the trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victim Zhang Yi, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Yang, and Kong, identification records, surveillance video, injury appraisal report from the County Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, medical records, settlement agreement, administrative penalty decision, account of the case, permanent residence inquiry, household registration certificates, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Cai": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in 2013, the victim, Liu Moujia, and a fellow townsman named Wang Mouchuang were gambling in a rental house in Songgang Street, Bao'an District of a certain city. Wang Mouchuang borrowed 10,000 yuan from the defendant Zhu. After Wang Mouchuang left the area, defendant Zhu could not find him and then demanded that Liu Moujia repay the money. On June 23, 2014, at around 22:00, the victim Liu Moujia encountered Zhu in the clothing city on Tangxia Street, Songgang, Bao'an District. Defendant Zhu took Liu to a mahjong parlor and contacted defendant Shen and two other men (handled in another case). After Shen and others arrived at the mahjong parlor, Shen drove a three-wheeled motorcycle with Liu Moujia, Zhu, and others to a certain section of the road and threatened Liu Moujia to repay the money. During this period, Liu Moujia refused to get on the vehicle, resulting in Zhu slapping him once, and then defendant Shen also slapped Liu Moujia once. Later, Zhu and the others took Liu Moujia to a mahjong parlor and forced him to write an IOU for 10,000 yuan. After Zhu promised to give Shen 500 yuan, defendant Shen, around midnight on June 24, took the victim Liu to his home at No. 40-4, San Village Street, Songgang. Zhu contacted others by phone to guard the victim Liu Moujia and forced Liu Moujia to seek money through phone calls. By about 11:00 that day, Zhu slapped Liu Moujia again while pressuring him for money. Liu Moujia's sister, Liu Mouyi, received a phone c", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Huaiyin District in a certain city charged that on the night of October 23, 2014, defendants Zhang, Xu, together with Wang (handled in a separate case), went to the Aixin Jiayuan Residential Area in Matou Town, Huaiyin District of a certain city. At Wang's suggestion, they used methods such as prying open garage locks to commit theft. Defendants Zhang and Xu were responsible for keeping watch and transporting the stolen goods. The three of them jointly stole an Edison brand electric vehicle and two sets of electric vehicle batteries from the garage of Tang, an Aima brand scooter and a charger from the garage of Wang, an Aixinma brand electric vehicle from the garage of Jin, a Lepeng brand electric tricycle and a set of batteries locked to the stair railing at Yang's residence, and a set of batteries from an electric vehicle parked at the staircase entrance of Chen's residence. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen electric vehicles and batteries was RMB 11,738. After the crime, defendants Zhang and Xu were apprehended and brought to justice on May 10 and May 12, 2015, respectively. After being brought to justice, both defendants were able to truthfully confess to the criminal facts. Additionally, during the trial phase at this court, the two defendants returned the stolen funds amounting to RMB 11,738. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendant Zhang during the court trial and were corroborated by statements from victims Tang, Wang, Jin, Yang, Chen, testimony from non-appearing witnesses such as Yi, identification records, purchase receipts and certificates of conformity for the stolen electric vehicles, administrative penalty decisions, and evidence regarding the case-solving process, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain province charged that on October 15, 2016, the defendants Zhang and Liu drove a JAC Refine business vehicle with the license plate Jin AF28** and without a tobacco transport permit. They purchased 3,000 cartons of Golden Monkey King cigarettes from the warehouse of a liquor store in a town in the southern suburb of a city in a certain province at the price of 46.5 yuan per carton, paying a total of 139,500 yuan. They intended to transport them to a certain county for sale to earn the price difference. However, they were caught on the spot by the staff of the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of that county at the Tuba Highway entrance. The Luliang City Tobacco Monopoly Bureau's price certification determined that the price of the cigarettes illegally trafficked by Zhang and Liu was 165,000 yuan. To substantiate the alleged criminal facts, the public prosecution authority presented to the court the defendants' confessions, witness testimonies, tobacco product quality supervision and inspection identification report, price verification form, documentary evidence, and other evidence.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that, starting from October 2013, the defendants Huang, Yu, Fang, Li, Chen, Pan, and Zhou consecutively joined a pyramid scheme organization and engaged in illegal pyramid scheme activities in a certain location. On June 3 and June 26, 2014, the victims Peng and Qia were successively deceived into a pyramid scheme hideout located in Building Four, Unit One, Fourth Floor, Yijing Community, in a certain location. Huang organized Yu, Fang, Li, Chen, Pan, Zhou, and others to illegally restrict the personal freedom of Peng and Qia, not allowing them to leave the pyramid scheme organization and forcing them to pay money to purchase \"products.\" On July 7, 2014, the victims Peng and Qia were rescued from the pyramid scheme hideout by public security officers. Regarding the above accusations, the prosecution has submitted victim statements, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, and on-site evidence.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, the following facts were ascertained: Around 1:00 a.m. on December 9, 2013, Sun and her friends were dancing at the \"Balala\" bar on Wanrun Commercial Street in a certain district of a city, when they were harassed by a stranger. Later, the stranger left. Sun and her friends then contacted the defendant Li (Sun's husband), who subsequently contacted the defendant Yin and others to drive and look for the stranger to demand an explanation. When the defendants Li and others were driving near the \"Bubugao\" restaurant by the roadside near Hualian in a certain district, they encountered the victims Ye, Bian, and others. Since Sun identified that Ye was present and knew the stranger during the conflict with the stranger, the defendants Li and Yin chased Ye with weapons such as military daggers and axes for over a hundred meters, causing him to fall and then they assaulted him. They then forcibly took him back to the \"Balala\" bar, where they punched and kicked him again, threatening him to provide the stranger's phone number. Later, when the victim Bian and the stranger went to the \"Balala\" bar to investigate, Li, Yin, and others chased and attacked them with weapons. According to forensic identification, Ye suffered multiple soft tissue injuries and exposed dental pulp, assessed as minor injuries; Bian had soft tissue wounds on the torso, assessed as slight injuries. After being brought to justice, the defendants Li and Yin truthfully confessed their criminal acts. During the trial, the close relatives of defendants Li and Yin reached and fulfilled an agreement with victims Ye and Bian regarding civil compensation, and victims Ye and Bian expressed forgiveness to defendants Li and Yin. The facts mentioned above were also undisputed by defendants Li and Yin during the trial, supported by documentary evidence, witness testimonies from Sun and Liu who did not appear in court, statements from victims Ye and Bian, and confessions and defenses from defendants Li and Yin, as well as forensic expert legal documents No. 1930, No. 1953 from the Municipal Police Department Evidence Identification Institute. These evidence are sufficient to determine the facts. The defense opinions from Li's and Yin's defense attorneys, stating that defendants Li and Yin have shown frankness and actively compensated the victims obtaining their forgiveness, are consistent with the facts established in this case and are hereby accepted by this court according to law.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Qingyang District in a certain city charged: At approximately 6 a.m. on June 7, 2017, after conspiring together, the defendants Qi and Ba purchased a Wuling Hongguang van with license plate number Sichuan AX** at the roadside in a certain area of the city for 3,500 yuan (appraised value 31,931 yuan). The van contained 10 boxes of cherries (appraised value 6,500 yuan). Qi and Ba later parked the van in the basement level two of a parking lot located at No. 2, Section XX, First Ring Road, XX District of the city. Officers on patrol in the vicinity found the vehicle suspicious. Upon investigation, it was discovered that this vehicle had been stolen from the victim, Ma, at around midnight on June 7, 2017. The police then conducted surveillance. At around 7 p.m. on June 7, 2017, Qi and Ba were apprehended when they arrived at the parking lot to retrieve the van. The stolen vehicle has been returned to the victim. The above facts are substantiated by the following evidence, which was presented and cross-examined in court: 1. The process of how defendants Qi and Ba came to light and their identification information; 2. Photos of defendants Qi and Ba identifying the scene; 3. On-site inspection records and photos, surveillance screenshots; 4. Seizure decision, seizure records, seizure and return lists, receipt; 5. Identification records; 6. Statement from the victim, Ma; 7. Price appraisal report issued by the Price Appraisal Center of Qingyang District for the stolen van and the cherries on the vehicle; 8. Confessions from defendants Qi and Ba. The two defendants raised no objection to the criminal facts and evidence mentioned above, which this court hereby confirms in accordance with the law.", "label": {"Qi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ba": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between May and July 2016, the defendants Wang and Chen successively organized gambling activities at \"Lijing Hotel,\" \"Renhe Hotel,\" \"Yanzhi Holiday Hotel,\" \"Aili Grand Hotel,\" \"Qimai Runfu,\" and other locations in a certain county, involving individuals such as Chai, Shi, Zou, Yang, and Ma. They conducted gambling more than ten times using the poker game \"Zha Jin Hua.\" Each gambling session had more than four participants, with a total of over 40 people involved in the gambling process. Through these activities, Wang and Chen cumulatively profited tens of thousands of yuan by taking a cut from the gambling stakes.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on December 27, 2017, Songtao Jin Company Trade Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as \"Jin Company\") and Guizhou Deruibang Commercial Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as \"Deruibang Company\") signed the \"Commercial Service Management Contract,\" agreeing that Deruibang Company would be responsible for attracting businesses to settle in and manage commercial operations at a shopping plaza in a certain county in Songtao. The legal representative of Deruibang Company, defendant Dong, entrusted defendant Luo with the task of attracting businesses. In April 2018, defendant Luo negotiated and facilitated the entry of businessman Yang Moujiang into the shopping plaza to operate a shoe store.\n\nDefendants Dong and Luo, being aware that the renovation subsidy for Yang Moujiang was 180,000 yuan, conspired and had Dong create a fake contract under Deruibang Company's name for a renovation subsidy of 350,000 yuan with Yang Moujiang, which they submitted to Jin Company to claim the subsidy. Subsequently, Dong used the forged contract to claim a 350,000 yuan renovation subsidy from Songtao Jin Company Trade Co., Ltd. During the renovation, due to budget overruns, Yang Moujiang requested an additional 40,000 yuan in renovation subsidy. After Dong paid Yang Moujiang 220,000 yuan, the remaining 130,000 yuan was divided between the two defendants, with Dong receiving 32,500 yuan and Luo receiving 97,500 yuan.\n\nAfter discovering the situation, the person in charge of Jinyuan Company reported the case to the Public Security Bureau of a certain county in Songtao. Following a summons by phone from the public security authorities, defendants Dong and Luo truthfully confessed to their criminal activities and returned the illegal proceeds of 130,000 yuan to Jin Company.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that between September 21, 2020, and September 24, 2020, an individual named Ma in a certain township was defrauded of 145,500 yuan through order-brushing on an online platform. During this period, Ma transferred 18,561 yuan to the account of Gao, 30,979 yuan to Wang's account, and 49,670 yuan to Liu's account. In September 2020, the defendant Gao met a person through QQ and, knowing that the person intended to use bank cards for gambling activities, still sold three sets of bank cards he registered to the person at a price of 1,000 yuan per set. He sent the bank cards and other items to the person by mail. Gao's bank card number 62×××73 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 228,626 yuan being investigated. In September 2020, the defendant Wang, introduced by a friend Feng, sold his three sets of bank cards to another individual for similar gambling activities, knowing the intended use, at 1,000 yuan per set. Wang also mailed the bank cards and other items, making a profit of 2,000 yuan. Wang's bank card number 62×××72 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 247,297 yuan being investigated. In August and September 2020, through a friend called \"A,\" the defendant Liu was introduced to \"Jia.\" Despite knowing that the person intended to use the bank card for illegal activities, Liu sold a set of his registered bank cards to the person for 2,000 yuan. After being informed by \"Jia\" that the bank card was locked, Liu went to the service hall to report it lost, got a replacement card, withdrew 11,458 yuan from it, and split the amount with \"Jia,\" making a profit of about 7,700 yuan. Liu's bank card number 62×××77 was involved in a fraud case, with an amount of 406,802 yuan being investigated.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that in August 2013, the defendant Huang rented a property on Longping East Road, Longcheng Street, Longgang District, and used it to operate a game room, open 24 hours a day. During this period, the defendant Huang placed four gambling machines in the game room for patrons to gamble. Defendants Ceng, Wang, and Zhang were recruited to be responsible for cashier and management duties. At around 22:00 on August 20, 2013, police officers from the Longgang Branch of the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau conducted a routine inspection at the location and discovered gamblers using the four gambling machines. Consequently, the four aforementioned defendants were apprehended on the spot, and four gambling machines, gambling funds totaling 40,830 RMB, and a set of credit tools were confiscated. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Huang, Wang, Ceng, and Zhang during the court proceedings. Furthermore, these facts were substantiated by physical evidence such as the gambling machines provided by the public prosecutor and verified by the court; documentary evidence including the account of the arrest, the Public Security administrative penalty decision, extraction records, witness testimonies from Chen and Bai, identification records, the four defendants' confessions and defenses at the Public Security office, as well as on-site investigation records and photographs, all sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: On November 4, 2014, at around 1 p.m., at the construction site of a highway in Xigong Village, a certain town in a certain county, Gui had a dispute with Bao and Yang, who were defendants and part of the highway construction team, due to issues related to construction vehicles compacting the road. Subsequently, a physical altercation ensued between the parties, during which Gui was injured by Yang and Bao. According to the forensic appraisal by Anhui Chaoyang Judicial Appraisal Institute, Gui's injuries were determined to constitute minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Bao and Yang compensated the victim with an economic loss amounting to 120,000 yuan, and the victim expressed understanding towards Bao and Yang. The public prosecution authority presented evidence to the court to support the aforementioned facts, which include: 1. The statement of the victim Gui; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Sheng; 3. Confessions of the defendants Bao and Yang; 4. Records of the scene investigation by a certain county's public security bureau and forensic investigation photos, as well as the process of bringing the suspects to justice; 5. The appraisal opinion of Anhui Chaoyang Judicial Appraisal Institute, household registration certificate, and other evidence. Consequently,", "label": {"Bao": ["Surveillance"], "Yang": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that from December 2014 to July 2015, the defendant Wu, at his own home in a village in a certain town of a certain county, used \"underground Mark Six\" lottery to write bets on behalf of his superior, the defendant Zhou. He received bets amounting to 90,000 yuan from Liu, 9,000 yuan from Peng, and 24,145 yuan from Liang. The defendant Wu reported the total amount of these bets, 123,145 yuan, to the defendant Zhou. The defendant Zhou, at his own home in Yanpo Group of the same village, engaged in \"underground Mark Six\" lottery as well, and received a total of 123,145 yuan in bets from his subordinate, the defendant Wu. On July 23, 2015, police officers summoned the defendant Wu. On October 20 of the same year, the defendant Zhou surrendered at the Lukou police station. It was also found that the defendant Zhou was subjected to ten days of administrative detention and fined 2,000 yuan by the county's public security bureau on March 15, 2012, for participating in \"underground Mark Six\" gambling activities. After the case was uncovered, the police temporarily seized 5,000 yuan from the defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhou and Wu during the trial. These facts are corroborated by documents such as the account of the case development, the public security administrative penalty decision, admonition letter, registration form for fugitives, inspection transcripts, photo identifications, accounting records, list of seized items, call records, household registration information, testimonies from witnesses Liu, Peng, and Liang, as well as the defendants' confessions and defenses, and recognition transcripts, providing sufficient evidence for the conviction.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate charged: On May 12, 2014, the Qi County People's Court decided to judicially detain Jia for ten days. When the Judicial Police Brigade of the Qi County People's Court took Jia to Qi County Central Hospital for a pre-detention medical examination in accordance with the decision, Jia's relatives, Yang and another Yang, pulled and obstructed the process. After being advised to stop, one of the Yangs contacted her husband, Ren. Ren arrived at Qi County Central Hospital and assaulted Shi, a judicial police officer from the Qi County People's Court. Subsequently, Ren colluded with the defendants Yang and Ren to come to Qi County Central Hospital. Despite being stopped by on-site police officers, the two used violence against Song, a judicial police officer from the Qi County People's Court, who was performing his duties, thereby obstructing law enforcement, before fleeing by car. A forensic examination determined that the injuries to Song and Shi were minor.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found: 1. At approximately 16:30 on November 1, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wang Jia from under the Yanchun Building shopping mall in Renqiu City. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,267 RMB. After the incident, the electric bicycle was lawfully seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim Wang Jia. 2. Around 10:00 on November 8, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wang Yi from under the Yuanping Shopping Mall in Renqiu City. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,333 RMB. On March 3, 2016, the two defendants compensated the victim Wang Yi with 2,300 RMB in cash, and Wang Yi expressed understanding of their actions. 3. At noon on November 10, 2015, defendants Li and Fu stole an electric bicycle belonging to Wu from under the Leisha Shopping Mall in Renqiu City and were caught on the spot by plainclothes team police officers from Renqiu City's Public Security Bureau. This electric bicycle was already returned to the victim Wu. The valuation of this bicycle was 2,236 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not objected to by defendants Li and Fu during the trial process and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Wu, sketches and photos of the theft scenes, the price verification conclusion from the Renqiu City Price Verification Center for Involved Items, identification records and photos, the arrest report provided by the Criminal Investigation Brigade of Renqiu City's Public Security Bureau, the arrest report provided by the Anti-theft Unit of the Renqiu City Public Security Bureau Criminal Police Brigade, and the household registration certificate letters of the two defendants, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of January 22, 2013, at around 7 p.m., the defendants Wang and Shu were assigned by the leadership of the Yicheng City Detention Center to be on duty at the Yicheng City People's Hospital to guard the detained individual, Zou. The guard duty was from 8:00 p.m. on January 22, 2013, until 8:00 a.m. on January 23, 2013. At around 10 p.m. on the 22nd, the detainee, Zou, requested to use the bathroom. Wang handed the key to the leg irons, which he was keeping, to Shu. Shu unlocked Zou's leg irons, and after Zou finished using the bathroom, Shu put the leg irons back on him. After that, the two sat nearby to guard Zou until around midnight, when Wang and Shu both fell asleep. At 2:33 a.m. on the 23rd, Zou took the opportunity while Wang and Shu were asleep to slip off the leg irons and escape from his hospital bed to outside the hospital. It wasn't until 10:47 a.m. on January 25, 2013, that Yicheng City Public Security Bureau patrol officers apprehended Zou and took him back into custody.", "label": {"Wang": [], "Shu": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that on June 6, 2016, at 21:00, at the chemical park railway bridge in Yimatu Town, Fumeng County, defendants Bai and Wang got into a fight with the victim, Zhang, due to an argument. During the altercation, defendants Bai and Wang injured the victim Zhang, resulting in Zhang being hospitalized at Fuxin Mining (Group) Ping'an Hospital. The hospital diagnosed him with: closed cranial brain injury, fracture of the right orbital inner wall, traumatic loosening of multiple teeth, loss of one tooth, fracture of the right frontal process of the maxilla, and fracture of the left nasal bone. On July 26, 2016, the Fuxin Fangzheng Forensic Appraisal Institute assessed that Zhang's injuries included: 1. Fractures of the nasal bone and right frontal process of the maxilla, which, according to Article 5.2.4.o of the \"Standards for Identification of Human Injury Severity,\" were classified as minor injury of the second degree; 2. Fracture of the right inner orbital wall, which was classified as a minor injury according to Article 5.2.4.d of the same standards; 3. Loss of tooth in the lower jaw, post-injury consultation records showing right lower 1 tooth missing, left lower 1 tooth with grade II mobility, and post-injury consultation records 7 days later showing left lower 1 tooth had fallen out on its own, which according to Article 5.2.5.j of the said standards, constituted a minor injury. On August 26, 2016, defendant Bai was summoned to the case by Yimatu Police Station of Fumeng County Public Security Bureau. On March 5, 2017, defendant Wang was also summoned to the case by the Yimatu Police Station of Fumeng County Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Bai": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that on a night in June or July 2016, defendant Tian went to a certain village in a town of this city, at a certain number on Huá Níng Road by the roadside, and, by opening car doors, stole 10 yuan from a Land Rover SUV parked by Jiang. He then fled the scene. On a night in September 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a certain village on a street of this city, to the entrance of Du's house, and, by opening car doors, stole over 20 yuan from a van with the license plate G××××× parked by Qian, then fled the scene. On another night in September 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a playground in a certain village of this town, and, using the door-opening method, stole over 20 yuan from a black Chevrolet sedan, and then from another sedan with the license plate G××××× parked by Ma, they stole over 10 yuan, later fleeing the scene. On the early morning of September 22, 2016, defendants Tian and Bai went to a certain village on a street of this city and, by opening car doors, stole over 500 yuan, one Samsung S6 phone worth 2160 yuan, and a pack of Zhonghua soft-shell cigarettes worth 65 yuan from a Mercedes-Benz sedan with license plate G××××× parked by Wu at the roadside. These facts were not contested by defendants Tian and Bai during the trial. They are corroborated by the statements of victims Wu, Qian, and Ma, identification records and photos made by the public security organ, video surveillance footage, the administrative penalty decision by the Dongyang Public Security Bureau, situational explanations provided by police officers, the account of the capture process, and household registration certificates of defendants Tian and Bai, which are sufficient to establish the offense.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of August 21, 2015, at around 7 PM, the defendant Tuo, along with the defendant A, was near the overpass south of the Memorial Tower at Bayi Square in Nanchang City. A was responsible for covering, while Tuo carried out the pickpocketing, stealing a white vivo phone (valued at 860 RMB according to the appraisal) from the victim, Hu's, backpack. After the theft, the two sold the phone for 100 RMB, and they used the proceeds together. Later, Zhang, who purchased the phone, handed it over to the police; the police confiscated the phone and returned it to Hu. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Tuo and A during the court hearing. There is also corroborative evidence such as a small card with a phone number; photos of the stolen item and the crime scene; arrest details, explanatory notes, seizure warrant, and seizure list issued by the public security bureau; records of permanent residents, criminal judgment; victim Hu's report and statement; testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Xu; inspection transcripts; extraction records and photos; surveillance video and screenshots; appraisal conclusion on the value; confessions of defendants Tuo and A along with synchronous audio-visual recordings; and identification transcripts and photos, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tuo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "A": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on October 7, 2014, the defendants Zhang and Lv rode a motorcycle and followed a motor tricycle driven by Yue and stopped on a section of road from Xuzhou Tongshan District Daxu Town Agricultural Bank to a village in Jiawang District, Route 252. Taking advantage of the moment when Yue and his wife Dai were not paying attention, they stole 30,000 yuan in cash from the front passenger seat of the tricycle parked on the roadside. After the incident, the defendant Lv returned part of the stolen money. The defendants Zhang and Lv raised no objections during the court hearing process, and the aforementioned facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Yue and Dai, identification records and photographs, crime resolution report, arrest process documentation, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lv": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that the defendant Hao worked in the No. 8 mining area tunnel of the Yinfeng Mining Co., Ltd. in Chicheng County. In mid-December 2013, after detonating explosives in the tunnel, Hao discovered a detonator on the ore and brought it home. While working in the tunnel again later, Hao found two detonators with fuses in an old tunnel's abandoned wall hole and also took them home, hiding them in his cellar with the previous detonator. On December 20, 2013, Hao sent the serial numbers of the three detonators via text message to Zhang, the person in charge of the mining area, demanding 150,000 RMB and instructing Zhang to deliver the money to a certain city. The next day, Hao informed defendant Duan of the situation and asked Duan to accompany him to retrieve the money in that city. After receiving the extortion message from Hao, Zhang reported the incident to the Public Security Bureau of Chicheng County. On December 20, 2013, Hao and Duan were arrested by the public security organs at the overpass on Xinhua Back Street in the Qiaoxi District of that city while preparing to collect the money. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by evidence, including the acceptance registration form, the filing decision, the account of the arrest, the search warrant, the search record, the seizure decision, the list of seized items, the list of items returned, the transfer list of items with the case, explanatory photographs, a situation explanation, basic information on permanent residents from the Public Security Bureau of Chicheng County, the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Ji, and Qi, and a gray bar phone, sufficient to conclude the case.", "label": {"Hao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Duan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province charges: Company 1 (English name: XXX, INC) is registered with Trademark No. 44088881 \"XX\" and Trademark No. 5237387 \"Company 1\" in a certain country, approved for use in Class 9 data processing equipment (electronic), etc. Trademark No. 44088881 is valid from June 28, 2007, to June 27, 2017, and Trademark No. 5237387 is valid from December 14, 2010, to December 13, 2020. Around March 2015, defendants Li and Yang sought illegal profits by engaging in activities that infringed on registered trademarks. They used the premises located at Unit 1, Street 1, Village 1, District 1 of this city, and House 2, Alley 2, Village 2, District 2 as bases for their operations. Li was responsible for purchasing second-hand hard drives and sales, while Yang was responsible for repairs, testing, and labeling. According to the shipping documents found on-site, the operation amount reached 2,016,619 RMB. On November 20, 2015, defendants Li and Yang were arrested at the aforementioned location, and 1,248 hard drives related to Company 1 were seized (after appraisal, these products were found to infringe on XXX, INC's exclusive rights to its registered trademark, with a total value of 394,066 RMB). Additionally, tools used for committing the crime, such as USB flash drives, MHDD professional testing machines, barcode scanners, 5 sheets of XX label paper, and 220 XX packaging bags were seized.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of December 19, 2013, defendants Zhang and Xia went to a certain number on Fu Lane Bridge, Fu Lane Residential Committee, Yangming Street, in a certain city. They used methods such as climbing over the wall and lock-picking to enter the third floor of the victim Yuan Ming's residence. During the burglary, they noticed patrolling police officers, and defendant Zhang immediately fled the scene, while defendant Xia was caught on the spot by the police. On January 16, 2014, the police arrested defendant Zhang. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Xia during the trial. They are confirmed by documentary evidence such as the \"Arrest Process\" from the Public Security Bureau of the city, population information, criminal judgment, entry and exit records, the testimony of witness Wei, statements from victims Yuan Jia and Yuan Yi, identification records and photos, as well as crime scene investigation records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Chen rented a house below the east gate embankment in a certain town in a certain county, specifically for the purpose of stealing others' property using a \"honey trap\" method with Ban and Cao (both already convicted). This method involved the woman selecting a target, bringing the target to the rented location for a \"massage,\" and then the man stealing the target's property while the target was unguarded. Between December 3, 2014, and January 4, 2015, defendant Chen invited defendant Bi to commit the crimes on four occasions, stealing a total of 4,270 RMB in cash from victims Li, Yang, Wang-yi, and Li. The specific facts are as follows:\n\n1. On the afternoon of December 3, 2014, at approximately 1 p.m., defendant Bi used the pretext of a massage to bring victim Li into the house rented by defendant Chen. Defendant Bi first asked Li to pay a 30 RMB massage fee and then told Li to remove his clothes and place them on the bedside cabinet. Bi then", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bi": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early hours of June 1, 2013, defendants Zhou, Sun, Zhou A (handled in another case), and Zhu (handled in another case), without reason, assaulted the victim Tao outside a bar at Xijindu, Runzhou District, Zhenjiang City, after consuming alcohol. This resulted in swelling of soft tissues on Tao's forehead, nasal bone fracture, left upper maxillary fracture, right orbital medial wall fracture, and fractures of the right 2nd to 5th anterior ribs. According to the medical appraisal, the injuries sustained by the victim Tao (male, 63 years old) were classified as second-degree minor injuries. On July 3, 2013, defendant Sun voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution believes that the actions of defendants Zhou and Sun constitute the crime of X and recommends that this court impose penalties in accordance with Article X, Item (1) of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhou and Sun expressed no objection to the facts charged in the indictment and did not provide any defense. The facts ascertained by this court during the trial are consistent with those charged in the indictment. Additionally, it was found that on June 27, 2013, Zhou’s relatives compensated the victim Tao with 20,000 yuan for medical expenses. This information is corroborated by the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhou and Sun, the confessions and defenses of co-defendants Zhou B and Zhu, the statement of the victim Tao, and the testimonies of witnesses Ni, Liu, and others. Also confirmed by the case and arrest reports issued by the public security bureau, outpatient records, imaging reports, admission records, receipts, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, release certificate, identification records, and the forensic medical injury assessment report, this evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of Hunan Province charged: At around 17:00 on August 6, 2016, defendants Chen, Liu, and Yi reached the underground mall on Qianzhou Rate, Yingfeng West Road, in a certain district of a city. Defendants Chen and Yi acted as lookouts while defendant Liu used a blade to cut the cord of a gold pendant valued at 1890 yuan, worn by the victim, Qiang (age 3), around his neck, and stole it. After the incident, the family of defendant Liu compensated the victim Qiang for his losses and obtained understanding from the victim's legal representative. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Chen, and Yi during the court trial, and are supported by evidence such as household registration data, account of the incident, statement of circumstances, letter of understanding, Criminal Judgment No. (2016) Xiang 1123 Xing Chu 28, Certificate of Release from Criminal Detention by Shuangpai County Detention Center, Administrative Penalty Decision No. [2014] 1406 by Huai City South Public Security, Compulsory Isolation Drug Rehabilitation Decision No. [2014] 0407 by Huai City South Public Security, statements from victim Qiang and legal representative Zeng, confessions and defenses of defendants Chen, Liu, and Yi, on-site investigation records, on-site plans and photos, examination records and photos, identification records and photos, extraction records, seizure decision and seized items list, identification records, Price Determination Opinion He Jia Min Jian Zi (2016) No. 1010, audio-visual materials, and city surveillance video discs, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yi": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendants Zhang, Cheng, and Zhou voluntarily pleaded guilty, acknowledged the facts charged by the prosecution, and were willing to accept punishment. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court trial, and were substantiated by witness testimonies recorded by Fan and Gao, identification records, seizure records and inventories, extraction records, electronic data, as well as evidence such as the case report provided by the police officers from Binhuzhen Police Station, Jintan Branch of Changzhou Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial, it was found that at approximately 1:00 a.m. on June 24, 2015, defendants Luo and Ban took a taxi to 78 Wennan Road, Dongcheng District, in a certain city, below the Taiping Life Insurance Company building. They climbed to the third floor via the iron gate and canopy at the company's entrance. Luo used a metal pipe he had brought to pry open a window guard on the third floor, and both Luo and Ban entered the office to commit theft. They stole 6 AMD brand processors, 1 Western Digital brand hard drive, 1 fifth edition RMB commemorative booklet, 5 WESTERN brand hard drives, 3 ADATA brand memory sticks, 6 Samsung brand memory sticks, 1 Lenovo brand laptop set, 1 Dell brand laptop set, 1 WESTERN brand external hard drive, and 3,500 yuan in cash (the total value of stolen property was approximately 17,500 yuan). After succeeding, Luo and Ban fled the scene. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Luo and Ban during the trial and were corroborated by the testimony of the victimized unit's employee, Jiang, the scene investigation record, site map, site photos, the appraisal form for the reference value of the involved property in a certain city, arrest process, basic information on permanent residents, administrative penalty decision, extraction record, extraction trace registration form, seizure decision and inventory list, search warrant, call records, surveillance video, and the confessions and recognition records of defendants Luo and Ban, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ban": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on November 25, 2015, defendants Lou and Li conspired to commit theft. At around 2 PM on the same day, the two defendants went to Jixin Community in a certain district of a city. Defendant Li acted as a lookout while defendant Lou pried open the main door of the apartment 503, Unit 4, Building 107, which was rented by a person named Zhang. They stole a Lenovo V580 laptop. After the successful theft, the two defendants sold the laptop to a person named Liang, receiving 500 RMB and two bags of methamphetamine. The money was divided between the two, and they consumed the methamphetamine. According to the price appraisal, the aforementioned laptop was valued at 1789 RMB. During the court hearing, defendants Lou and Li had no objection to these facts, which are also supported by the statements of the victim Zhang, testimonies of witnesses Xie and Liang, the identification record of defendant Lou identifying defendant Li and the purchaser of the stolen goods, Liang; the identification record of defendant Li identifying defendant Lou, video footage, and screenshots from the crime scene; the identification record of the buyer of the stolen laptop, Liang, identifying defendant Lou; the on-site identification records by defendants Lou and Li; surveillance video disc from the Jidong Cement Kindergarten in a certain district of the city; the scene inspection record No. 010 (2015) issued by the criminal police brigade of the Dongshui Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city; the price appraisal conclusion No. 25 (2016) issued by the Tang Pricing Certification Center; household registration certificates of defendants Lou and Li; a social investigation report on defendant Li issued by the criminal police brigade of the Dongshui Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city; a statement on how the case was solved, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Lou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the evening of March 30, 2015, the defendant Jiang, due to a disagreement with the victim Zeng after a conversation while drinking, in order to vent his dissatisfaction, gathered defendant Shi and others to carry knives and went to the Joyful Chess Room opened by the victim Zeng at No. 52, Group 14, Yonghe Village, Qiaosi Street, a certain district in a certain city. There, they randomly smashed items in the chess room, including chess tables, computers, glass doors, and other properties, leading to a total loss of 15,166 yuan. On May 10, 2015, defendant Shi voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities. After the incident, the relatives of defendant Jiang have compensated the victim Zeng with 30,000 yuan, and defendant Jiang has obtained the victim Zeng's forgiveness.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged: Starting in February 2014, the defendant Zhao, without obtaining an operating permit, set up an unlicensed electroplating workshop in a makeshift shed diagonally opposite No. 287 Beixin Road, Beixin Village, Haibin Street, Longwan District, Wenzhou City. Defendants Huang, Leng, and Jiang were subsequently hired to perform electroplating processes within the workshop, and they discharged the wastewater pollutants generated by electroplating directly into the outdoor farmland without any treatment. On March 18 of the same year, the workshop was discovered by the public security and environmental protection departments. Testing revealed that the total chromium content of the wastewater pollutants discharged by the workshop was 1.06×10^4 mg/L, exceeding the national pollutant discharge standards by more than three times. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above charges.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Leng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province charged that on the evening of January 4, 2016, defendants Bai, Tian, and Liu, after planning, stole 42 Shuangdeng brand 2V valve-controlled sealed lead-acid batteries-standard series 2V/500Ah backup batteries, valued at 6,300 RMB, from the XX communication station located 400 meters east of the Hengguan Jing and Jiande Road intersection in a certain town in the city. On the evening of January 6, 2016, defendants Bai and Tian, together, stole 4 Shuangdeng brand 6-FMX-150C batteries, valued at 3,445 RMB, from the XX communication station about 30 meters west of Jianghang Farm in a village in the same town; later, they went to the XX base station at the entrance of Nanhang Natural Village in the same town and stole 24 Nandu brand GFM400Ah batteries (valued at 3,120 RMB) and other items such as copper wire from victim Wang. Defendants Bai and Tian sold the stolen goods and were caught red-handed when they returned to the base station to steal again. Defendants Tian and Liu confessed the facts of their crimes truthfully after being apprehended.", "label": {"Tian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district charged: On July 1, 2014, defendants Zhu and Chen, knowing that Zhang, Guo, Qiu, Wang, and others were drug users, facilitated drug use. To this end, in Room 503 of Zijin Apartment, Longmen Town, a certain district of a certain city, defendant Zhu provided identification, and defendant Chen provided funds for registration and check-in. Subsequently, defendant Zhu provided methamphetamine (crystal meth) to accommodate the drug use of the aforementioned individuals. On the same day, public security personnel arrested defendant Chen in the said room; later, public security personnel arrested defendant Zhu at the \"Deep Breathing Internet Cafe\" in a certain city, a certain district. Upon testing by the staff of the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the urine samples of drug users Zhang, Guo, Qiu, and Wang all tested positive for methamphetamine. The defendants Zhu and Chen raised no objections to the above facts during the trial. These facts are substantiated by evidence including the household registration certificates and proof of no prior criminal records of both defendants, details of the arrests, accommodation registration card, seizure list, testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Wang, Qiu, and Guo, the confessions of defendants Chen and Zhu, and the on-site testing report from the Xinluo Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on July 30, 2015, the defendant Li contacted the drug buyer Yang via WeChat to sell drugs and received a payment of 560 yuan through WeChat transfer. The two parties agreed to deliver the drugs to the Jinsha Times Community in Shapingba District. At around 10 p.m. that day, Li arranged for the defendant Wu to deliver the drugs. Wu, knowing it was drugs, delivered 0.96 grams of methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") and 0.19 grams of methamphetamine tablets (commonly known as \"magu\") to a locker in Jinsha Times Community in Shapingba District as per Li's request. Wu was later caught by police and the drugs were seized. After Wu was taken into custody, he assisted the police in apprehending the defendant Li. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Li and Wu during the court trial and are supported by testimonial evidence from witnesses Yang and Xiong, identification records, material acquisition records, sealing records, seizure decision, list of seized items, weighing records, identification of WeChat chat and drug photos, drug inspection reports, call records, case background, explanation of Wu's meritorious performance, weighing photos, public security administrative penalty decision, and confessions from defendants Li and Wu, all sufficient to establish the case. The prosecution suggested sentencing defendants Li and Wu to one to two years of imprisonment and imposing fines. The defense counsel for Wu argued that Wu was an accomplice and should receive a lighter punishment; Wu’s meritorious actions were grounds for leniency in sentencing.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 8 PM on April 25, 2012, the defendants Yan, Li, and Yuan, under the instigation of Yan Moumou (already sentenced), went to the area outside a chess and card room at the central village market in Lianshi Town, a district in this city. As Yan Moumou failed to obtain someone else's phone number from Zhang, the group used steel pipes and benches to beat the victim Zhang. This resulted in the victim sustaining a fracture of the right clavicle and contusions to both lungs with a fracture of the 8th rib on the left chest. According to forensic identification, the injury to the victim Zhang's clavicle was determined to be of minor injury severity. The facts above were not contested by the defendants Yan, Li, and Yuan during the court hearing. These facts are supported by evidence including household registration certificates, the criminal judgment, a certificate of release upon completion of the sentence, confessions from the accomplice Yan Moumou, testimonies from witnesses Wei and Wu, the arrest process, the victim Zhang's statement, a forensic examination certificate of the degree of bodily injury, identification records, and photographs, which are sufficient to confirm the findings.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 3 PM on July 30, 2015, defendant Wang called the victim Li, Zhang's ex-wife, and invited her to a karaoke bar to sing. At that time, Li was having a meal at the home of her friend, victim Sun, with her colleagues, Wang and Cao. After receiving the call, Li, along with Sun, Wang, and Cao, went to Room 204 of \"Mou Mou KTV\" in a certain town in the county to sing with Wang and Wang Moumou (handled in a separate case). During the singing, Wang saw Sun behaving ambiguously with Li, and angrily left the room to call Zhang, saying that he saw one of Li's friends hugging her while singing, and asked Zhang to come over. Wang then waited for Zhang downstairs at the KTV. Ten minutes later, they met and conspired to assault Sun. Subsequently, Wang and Zhang entered Room 204. Zhang mistakenly thought Wang was the one hugging Li, so he grabbed Wang's arm. Wang said, \"It's not him!\" and pointed at Sun, saying, \"It's him!\" Then Zhang, Wang, and Wang Moumou pu", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found: In the early morning of October 6, 2019, Duan went to find the defendant Shi in the upper section of Jinjia Village, Gucheng District, Lijiang City, and entrusted Shi to help purchase drugs. After agreeing, Shi received a total of 5500 RMB from Duan in two transfers via WeChat as payment for purchasing the drugs and as a reward. Shi later informed the defendant He about this matter and asked for He's help in buying drugs, promising to compensate He afterward. At approximately 16:40 the same day, He took Shi to Jinkai Square to purchase heroin, and was apprehended by the public security authorities as they were preparing to leave after buying the drugs. The police confiscated three small packages of suspected drugs wrapped in a white transparent plastic bag from He on site. Upon measurement, the net weight of the suspected drugs found on He was 2.22 grams. The identification confirmed the presence of heroin in the seized substances. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Shi and He during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence submitted by the public prosecution agency and presented, examined, and verified in court, including: the case registration form, frontal and profile photos of the defendants, household registration proof, the account of the arrest, examination record, seizure decision letter, seizure list, measurement record, measurement photos, measurement notification record, extraction material record, extraction photos, extraction record, personnel identification record and photos, examination report, electronic evidence inspection record, mobile phone call logs, confession and defense statements of the defendants, and two mobile phones submitted with the case. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts. The defendants Shi and He did not contest the facts and charges brought by the indictment, signed a confession and punishment agreement with the prosecution, and voluntarily expressed their willingness to plead guilty and accept punishment in court.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On August 18, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine (ice) in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 2. On September 3, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 3. On September 28, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Yan for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 4. On October 12, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Xiang for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. 5. On October 13, 2014, the defendants Peng and Sha harbored Li for drug use of methamphetamine in a rented residence at Sunshine Holiday Apartment 515, Xinqi Street, District, City. On October 17, 2014, the defendant Sha assisted the public security authorities in arresting the drug trafficking suspect Xiang. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Peng and Sha during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yan Huan, Xiang, Li, and Tang; identity recognition records, location recognition records, and photos; urine test reagent photos; on-site test report; meritorious deed recognition letter; arrest statement records; administrative penalty decision; community detoxification decision; house lease contract; and population information. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charges: 1. On the morning of February 26, 2014, defendants Hu and Xiao, after premeditation, went to No. 28, North Highway, Shaojia Hui Village, Luotuo Subdistrict, Zhenhai District, where they used tools to cut the lock and stole an electric tricycle parked there by Fang, valued at 4,670 RMB. 2. On the evening of February 27, 2014, defendants Hu and Xiao, after premeditation, went to the entrance of Nanbei Logistics in Luotuo Subdistrict, Zhenhai District, and used the method of pushing the vehicle to steal a Philips-brand electric bike parked there by Jia, valued at 1,615 RMB. The two stolen electric bikes have been recovered by the public security authorities and returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Hu and Xiao during the court trial, and are supported by documentary evidence including seizure decision documents, seizure lists, special receipts for temporarily seized items, return item lists, photographs, arrest reports, household registration certificates, statements of circumstances, statements from victims Fang and Jia, price evaluation reports, recognition records, and surveillance videos, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that: 1. On May 22, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into rooms 306 and 208 at Tiger Bay Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 306 and 208, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 1,136 RMB. 2. On May 23, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into rooms 216 and 217 at Encounter Boutique Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 216 and 217, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 1,008 RMB. 3. On May 29, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng successively checked into rooms 408, 506, 606, and 607 at Tiger Bay Hotel in this city. They stole the CPUs, memory sticks, and solid-state drives from the desktop computers in rooms 408, 506, 606, and 607, and then sold them for profit. Upon evaluation, the value of the CPUs and memory sticks from the stolen desktop computers in these rooms was 2,272 RMB. 4. On July 8, 2019, defendants Yu and Zheng checked into room 503 at Oasis Hotel in this city. They stole two Kingston memory sticks from the desktop computer in the room and were caught on the spot after transferring them to room 407. Upon evaluation, the value of the memory sticks from the stolen desktop computer in this room was 155 RMB. In conclusion, defendants Yu and Zheng committed theft four times, with the total value of the stolen property amounting to 4,571 RMB.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In November 2012, the defendants Hu, Xu, Xiao, Zhang, and others, on six occasions, gathered in the market management office of defendant Xiao, located on the third floor of the small commodities market (farmers' market) in the Xiaoshan Development Zone, Hangzhou City. They assembled individuals including a person named Xu for gambling in the form of playing cards known as \"Kou Xiaojium\". Among them, defendant Hu took a rake and provided funds in the first five gambling sessions and assembled participants for the sixth session; defendant Zhang assembled gambling participants; defendant Xu assembled participants in the first five sessions; defendant Xiao was responsible for providing the gambling venue. The illegal profit from the six gambling sessions that defendants Hu, Xiao, and Zhang participated in amounted to a total of 31,000 yuan. Defendant Xu, who participated in five sessions, had an illegal gain of 25,000 yuan. Defendant Xiao received an illegal gain of 600 yuan, and defendants Zhang and Xu shared an illegal gain of 3,000 yuan. After the incident, defendant Xiao returned 600 yuan of the illicit money, and defendant Zhang returned 1,700 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Hu, Xiao, Zhang, and Xu during the trial proceedings. Additionally, the witness testimonies of individuals such as Xu and Meng, identification records, lists of seized items, the course of the incident, and the household registration certificates of defendants Hu, Xiao, Zhang, and Xu all serve as evidence sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on January 16, 2014, at around 3 p.m., the defendants Zhang and Jiang traveled by car from a certain prefecture to a certain location. Near 21-13 Dazhong Alley, South Street, Lecheng Street, in the city, defendant Jiang used tweezers to commit theft, while defendant Zhang was responsible for covering and acting as a lookout. Together, they stole two mobile phones (which have been recovered). According to the price appraisal, the red BBK phone was valued at 560 yuan, and the white Apple phone was valued at 960 yuan. It was also found that on January 16, 2014, defendant Zhang was summoned due to suspicious behavior and truthfully confessed to his criminal acts. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Zhang and Jiang during the trial, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim Liu, the tweezers, the mobile phones, the list of seized and returned items, photos, the verification of prior convictions, phone inquiry records, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving a sentence, household registration information, the account of the arrest, the explanatory note, the price appraisal conclusion, the on-site identification record, and other evidence, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that on July 13, 2015, around 5 PM, the defendants Qiu and Wang, after premeditation, went to the back of a certain internet cafe on Baotian Street in the city, specifically to the entrance of the stairs on the first floor of Yin's residence on Longhai Road, Shangpan Village, Baotian Street. There, they stole a yellow Chuangye brand moped. The vehicle was appraised at a value of 1,480 RMB. On July 14, the same year, around 3 PM, the defendants Qiu and Wang rode the stolen moped to the entrance of the Mingdu Internet Cafe on Ruiguang Avenue, Xiabu Village, Dongshan Street, in the city, where they stole a yellow Yamaha Jog moped parked there by Zhang. The vehicle was appraised at a value of 1,660 RMB. On July 15, 2015, the defendants Qiu and Wang were apprehended by the police inside the Wuzhou Internet Cafe on Xincheng Street in the city, and a screwdriver used in the crime was seized. After the incident, the stolen vehicles were recovered and returned to the victims, Yin and Zhang. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Qiu and Wang during the court trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Zhang and Yin, the testimony of the witness Liang, identification records, appraisal conclusion documents, certificates of quality, receipts, seizure lists, return lists, photos, records of capture, criminal judgment documents, household registration certificates, and permanent resident information, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiaojiang District, a certain city, charges that from August 22 to August 24, 2012, defendants Gao, Yan, and Feng, together with Zhang A (already sentenced), opened a casino in rooms 1318 and 1501 of the Baishida Boutique Hotel in Baiyun Street, Jiaojiang District, a certain city, gathering people for gambling. The casino operated by gambling with poker in the form of \"Ba Er Zhang\" and profited by taking a rake from the banker. During this period, the casino engaged Li (handled in another case) to manage the rake, paying him a \"salary\" of 200 yuan per day. During the operation of the casino, a total profit of 14,000 yuan was made. On October 3, 2012, defendant Feng was arrested by police officers. On December 31, 2012, defendant Yan was arrested by public security officers, and on December 30, 2014, defendant Gao was arrested by public security officers. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao, Yan, and Feng during the court proceedings. The confessions of co-perpetrators Zhang A and Li, identification records, testimonies from witnesses You, Liu, Wu, Ying, Zhao, Tao, Fu, Ye, Liang, Zhang, Lu, Lu M, Sun, Zhu Jia, Zhu Yi, investigation records, lists of seized items, administrative penalty decision documents from the police, household registration certificates, arrest records, the criminal judgment of Zhang A for x crime, case investigation records, explanatory statements, domicile registration forms, and other evidence have sufficiently confirmed these facts.", "label": {"Gao": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Yan": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Feng": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province accuses the defendants Liu and Shao of plotting, and at around 2 a.m. on February 9, 2014, proceeding to the Yue Ting Private Cuisine restaurant located in Wuyang Square, Chengxiang Town of the said city, where they stole 12 RMB and items such as cigarettes, wine, and liquor with a total value of 1,514 RMB. Afterwards, the two sold some of the stolen cigarettes and liquor, obtaining 310 RMB in proceeds to fund their living expenses.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Shao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged: On July 2, 2013, the defendants Yu and Sha, after premeditation, followed the truck driver Peng, who was secretly selling steel bars, by car to the Qianjiang Economic Development Zone \"Jiulong Cang\" construction site in a certain town in a certain district of a certain city. Then, the defendants Yu, Sha, and others threatened the victim Peng with \"if you don't pay, we will report your secret sale of steel bars to the company or public security authorities,\" and forcibly demanded 15,000 yuan from him. The victim Peng, having no choice, agreed to pay and contacted his friends Zhang, Wang, and others to raise the money by phone. During the victim's phone calls for fundraising, his friends Zhang, Zhou, Cheng, and others rushed to the construction site upon hearing the news. When the defendants Yu, Sha, and others saw this, they immediately took pre-prepared homemade knives from the trunk of their car and fought with Zhang and others. Later, the defendants Yu and Sha were subdued by Zhang and others and handed over to the Chongxian Police Station. Meanwhile, Wang had deposited 5,000 yuan into a China Agricultural Bank card account designated by the defendants as per the fundraising request of the victim Peng. After the incident, the 5,000 yuan was recovered by the public security authorities and returned to Wang.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of June 22, 2014, the defendants Feng and Fan, after premeditation, went to the entrance of the \"Baolong Hotel\" on Meiling Street in Jinjiang City, and sold 10.92 grams of the drug ketamine (commonly known as K powder) to a person referred to as Xiao for 600 RMB. They were subsequently apprehended on the scene by the public security authorities, and the drugs involved in the transaction were confiscated. The public security authorities also seized 600 RMB in cash and a TETC-L915 mobile phone used for contacting drug deals from the defendant Feng. After the incident, the confiscated drugs were turned over to the Office of the Anti-drug Committee of Jinjiang City. It was further identified by this court that Xiao contacted the defendant Feng to purchase the drugs, and the drugs involved in this case belonged to the defendant Feng. After the incident, the cash that was seized has been processed according to the law by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts are not contested by the defendants Feng and Fan during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Xiao, as well as recognition records and photos, recognition explanations, lists of evidence collected, seizure orders, lists of seized items, seizure records and photos, return lists, weighing records and photos, judicial appraisal reports, receipts for the submission of physical drugs, on-site testing reports and urine test photos, mobile phone communication records, personal information and household registration certificates, accounts of the capture and case-solving process provided by the public security authorities, work explanations, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "It was found after trial that at around 7 a.m. on June 29, 2016, Yan, the person in charge of a certain kindergarten in a certain county, violated national regulations by arranging for Pan to drive a non-school bus to pick up students in and around certain villages. Defendant Pan drove a gray Lifan minivan with a capacity of 8 people, but actually carried 23 people, exceeding the capacity by 15, resulting in severe overloading of this school bus. It was further found that after the incident, defendants Yan and Pan turned themselves in. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court hearing and were confirmed by the testimony of witnesses such as Guo, proof of household registration, and the confessions of defendants Yan and Pan, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: In April and May 2013, the defendant Tang and Zhu (handled in a separate case), after premeditated planning, decided to steal copper high-strength enclosed busbars from the production lines that had ceased production at the old factory site of the ** Automobile Co., Ltd. in a certain location. Tang invited the defendant Ye, who was then an officer in the security division of ** Automobile Co., Ltd., to participate and assigned roles. From May to the end of July 2013, Zhu organized Qian (handled in a separate case) and others to drive a van four or five times to the entrance of the old factory site of ** Automobile Co., Ltd., located in the High-Tech Industrial Development Zone of a certain area. Defendant Ye drove the van into the factory area, parking outside the painting and welding workshops. Zhu, Qian, and others entered the workshop, dismantling and removing items such as four types of copper high-strength enclosed busbars from the decommissioned production line busway and loaded them into the van. Defendant Ye then drove the van out of the factory and handed it over to the defendant Tang and others. Afterwards, Tang and Zhu sold the stolen goods to Qian, receiving illicit proceeds of more than 90,000 yuan, of which Tang received over 30,000 yuan, Ye received over 20,000 yuan, and the remainder was taken by Zhu. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Tang and Ye compensated the victim unit 48,000 yuan and 42,000 yuan respectively, and their actions were forgiven by the victim unit. To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Confessions of defendants Tang and Ye; 2. Report and statement from the victim unit; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Qian, Zuo, and others; 4. On-site investigation records and related photos; 5. Price appraisal opinion; 6. Household registration certificates, case filing process, bank card transaction details, letter of understanding, criminal record materials, and other related documentary evidence.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on September 27, 2014, the defendants Ren and You, after consuming alcohol, were at the security duty station of Yixin Jiayuan Community, located on the west side of the intersection of Jinsan Road and Linxi 1st Road in Lanshan District, Linyi City. Because their colleague Zhao did not obey the arrangement of defendant Ren, they punched and kicked Zhao, causing him to suffer fractures of the 8th and 12th ribs on the left side, multiple soft tissue contusions, and skin injuries. According to a forensic appraisal, Zhao's injuries were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Ren and You reached a reconciliation agreement with the victim Zhao, whereby the relatives of defendants Ren and You compensated the victim Zhao for various economic losses such as medical expenses and nursing fees, amounting to 22,000 yuan and 20,000 yuan respectively, totaling 42,000 yuan. The victim Zhao expressed understanding and forgiveness towards defendants Ren and You. These facts were not disputed by defendants Ren and You during the trial and are supported by forensic opinions; the compensation agreement, letter of forgiveness, and other documentary evidence; the process of their capture; household registration proof; witness testimonies; and victim statements; which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Ren": ["Imprisonment"], "You": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 11 p.m. on August 19, 2013, defendants Dong and Tang, together with Ma, Hu, Yang, Xie Chun, Dong (all handled in separate cases), and Zhang (who was under 14 years old at the time of the crime), went to Room 1202 at xxxx Hotel, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County, under the pretext of smashing someone else's casino and robbed the victims including Liu in the room of more than 4600 RMB in cash with knives. On August 31, 2013, defendant Tang assisted the public security organs in apprehending two other co-offenders. The prosecution submitted corresponding evidence for the aforementioned facts of the charges.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on December 11, 2014, the defendant Chen saw a job posting on Baixing.com by Li A in the name of Li B. Chen conceived the idea of luring Li A out under the pretense of offering a job, then controlling him to extort money from Li A's family to pay off debts. After discussing with Liang and Li C (handled in a separate case), Chen arranged several meetings with Li A. On December 15, 2014, in order to obtain Li A's mother's phone number to call her for extortion, Chen instructed Li C and Liang to deliver a note with his phone number to Li A's mother's workplace, asking her to call him back. On the afternoon of December 16, Chen once again set up a meeting with Li A under the guise of employment at the Tianyuan Hotel in Xiaoyi Town, and Liang posed as the hotel front desk staff. Chen drove a YuA××××× vehicle, and together with Liang, picked up Li A near New No.1 High School on Taihang Avenue in Huixian City. They stayed overnight at the Tianyuan Hotel and deceived Li A into handing over his mobile phone. The next day, Chen coaxed Li A to accompany him in debt collection. During this time, Chen instructed Liang to send a text message to Li A's family demanding 30,000 yuan in cash and making threats. Around 19:00 on December 17, 2014, Li A's family deposited 20,000 yuan into an account specified by Chen, after which Chen and Liang released Li A. The prosecution presented the court with household registration information, a detailed list from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, photos of text messages, a letter of understanding, identification records, witness testimonies, and the defendant’s confessions and defenses as evidence.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a Certain City charged that defendants Guan, Zhang, and Li, along with Ji (already dealt with in a separate case), conspired and Ji instructed Guan, Zhang, and Li to commit theft in a rental house leased by Ji in a village on Liquan Street of a Certain City. On April 12, 2017, at around 19:00, Xu drove to the rental house to get a massage from Li. Defendants Guan and Zhang took the opportunity to steal Xu's car keys and subsequently stole 10,600 yuan in cash from the Kia Cerato car Xu was driving. The four then divided the spoils. After the incident, defendant Li returned 2,000 yuan to the victim, and defendant Li obtained the forgiveness of victim Xu. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Guan, Zhang, and Li during the trial. The facts were corroborated by the statements of victim Xu, the testimony of witness Ji, case registration records, records of arrest, household registration information, case handling notes, a letter of forgiveness, receipt, hospital records, photos of Xu's bank cash withdrawal transactions, identification records and photos, on-site investigation records and photos, and scene identification records and photos, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the New District in a certain city accused that, on June 4, 2014, at approximately 1 a.m., Meng B (handled in a separate case) had a dispute with the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu over trivial matters. He then, along with the defendants Bian, Shi, and Meng A, Xu, Wang (all handled in separate cases), and others, irrationally attacked the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu with punches and kicks at a night market on a certain road in the New District of a certain city. According to forensic identification, victim Shao sustained a contusion to the right eye due to the external injury; victim Qiao sustained a laceration on the skin of the right palm, 1.8 cm long, due to the external injury; and victim Liu sustained an abrasion and contusion behind the right ear with an area exceeding 15 cm² due to the external injury. The injuries of the three individuals all constituted minor injuries. On July 3, 2014, the defendants Bian and Shi were apprehended and brought to justice. After being brought to justice, both truthfully confessed to the criminal facts mentioned above. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Bian and Shi during the trial. Additionally, they were corroborated by the testimony and identification records of the victims Shao, Qiao, and Liu, verified as authentic through cross-examination in court, as well as the testimony and identification records of witnesses Fei and Yang, the injury notice, the appraisal report from the Shanghai Fenglin International Medical Communication and Development Center Judicial Identification Institute, the arrest process documented by the public security organ, the relevant criminal judgment, and the household registration materials of the defendants Bian and Shi, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Bian": ["Imprisonment"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 11 a.m. on September 15, 2017, defendants Wen and Wan conspired to commit theft. At the Shichang Garden bus stop in Chuanshan District, Suining City, while the victim Wang was not paying attention, Wen stole an OPPOR9plus mobile phone from Wang's shoulder bag. According to the appraisal, the phone was valued at 1,100 RMB. After the incident, the stolen phone was returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wen and Wan during the court trial, and were corroborated by witness testimony, price appraisal, the original criminal judgment, a capture statement, and a list of seized and returned items.", "label": {"Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the afternoon of January 25, 2015, defendants Ding and Li conspired to commit pickpocketing. At around 14:00 on the same day, the two went to the Triangle Square in the Jiyang Street area of a certain city and boarded bus No. 10. While the victim, Xu, was not paying attention, defendant Li was responsible for blocking others' view and acting as a lookout, while defendant Ding reached into the victim’s bag and stole a white Apple phone worth 950 yuan. The two then got off the bus at the small goods market in the city and left. After the crime was discovered, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. To prove the above charges, the prosecution has submitted to the court evidence including personnel summaries, registered resident information, inventory and return lists, receipts, criminal judgements, release certificates, details of the arrest, victim Xu’s statement, defendants Ding and Li’s confessions and defenses, price authentication conclusions, etc. It is believed that in order to unlawfully possess others' property, defendants Ding and Li jointly committed pickpocketing, and should be held criminally responsible for the crime of x, constituting a joint offense. The court is requested to punish defendants Ding and Li according to the provisions of article x, article x of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. Defendants Ding and Li have no objections to the facts and charges presented by the prosecution and request a lenient sentence. After trial verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was found to be true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x as charged by the prosecution against defendants Ding and Li.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On December 29, 2011, due to a previous conflict and dispute between the victim Jiang and the parents of the defendant Diao, Diao gathered defendants Ke, Shen, and four others including Lu, intending to assault the victim Jiang. In the afternoon, Diao, along with Ke, Shen, Lu, and the other four, went to opposite the Forestry Lane of a certain Lake Road in a certain Lake City. After Diao spotted Jiang and identified him, he instructed Ke, Shen, Lu, and the others to enter the Lane and assault Jiang. Ke, Shen, Lu, and the others punched and kicked Jiang for several minutes before fleeing the scene. According to a forensic medical assessment of bodily injury, the injury suffered by Jiang was classified as minor. On September 4, 2014, a supplemental assessment classified Jiang's injury as a minor level 2 injury. After the incident, Diao was apprehended in a certain district's \"Jiang A Locksmith\" shop, temporarily detained at a certain city's detention center on August 28, 2014, and was taken out by the Lake City Public Security Bureau on September 2. On August 20, 2014, Shen was arrested by the police from Yangjiashan Police Station of Ma'anshan Public Security Bureau; Ke was apprehended by public security officers in Lake City District. Regarding the above allegations, the prosecution has provided corresponding evidentiary materials to the court.", "label": {"Diao": ["Imprisonment"], "Ke": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, from March 2016 to May 2017, the defendants Zhou, Liu, and Xu, among others, frequently gathered together, gradually forming a criminal syndicate with Zhou as the ringleader, and Liu and Xu as other members. Using Yancheng Wujie Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wujie Company) as a platform, they advertised under the pretense of \"low interest,\" \"quick loans,\" and \"vehicle mobility\" to attract victims to mortgage their vehicles for loans. They set up traps for default, arbitrarily declaring victims in default, taking away and concealing the victims' mortgaged vehicles, and then demanding exorbitant towing fees, penalties, and late fees, committing extortion in six instances, with illegal profits totaling 205,237 RMB (all currency hereinafter are in RMB). To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented and read in court the confessions and defenses of the defendants, statements from the victims, identification records, the case report, household registration information, and other evidence.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On October 5, 2011, at approximately 10:00 PM, defendants Gao and Zhang stole 320 yew saplings from a nursery belonging to An in Team 2, Chengxi Village, Ying'an Town, Hunchun City. According to a price appraisal, the stolen yew saplings were valued at RMB 2,560.00; 2. On October 10, 2011, at approximately 10:30 PM, defendants Gao and Zhang stole 1,675 yew saplings from the same location. The stolen yew saplings were valued at RMB 13,400.00 according to a price appraisal. Following the incident, defendant Gao assisted the public security authorities in capturing a co-offender, demonstrating meritorious behavior. The public security authorities recovered 1,675 yew saplings and returned them to the victim. The two defendants voluntarily compensated the victim for the economic loss of RMB 2,560.00. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao and Zhang during the court hearing and are substantiated by the confessions of the two defendants, the statement of the victim An, testimonies from witnesses Yuan and Huang, synchronized audio-visual materials from interrogations, on-site investigation records, material evidence, photos of the defendant identifying the scene, lists of seized and returned items, appraisal conclusions of the value of the involved items, Gao's previous criminal judgment and certificate of release after serving his sentence, identification documents of the involved parties, and evidence of how the case was solved, including meritorious service proof and work records, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Between October and December 2, 2017, defendant Xu placed two gambling machines (with a total of 3 positions) in the noodle shop operated by defendant Lu on Guo Street, in a certain town of a district in a certain city (near Guo Elementary School) for others to use for gambling. Defendant Lu provided convenience for the gambling machines placed by defendant Xu, such as venue, electricity, and currency exchange, and agreed to share the gambling proceeds. On December 2, 2017, a minor was caught by the police while gambling on the aforementioned machines. It was further discovered that, after being apprehended, defendant Lu truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, defendants Xu and Lu had no objection to the above facts, which are corroborated by testimonies from witnesses Li, Qiao, Han, Liu, and Wang; physical evidence: gambling machine (photos); inspection records made by the public security bureau of a certain district in a certain city; list of seized items; certificate of identification for electronic game facilities with gambling functions; household registration certificate; and evidence of the case development and apprehension process, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: At about midnight on May 31, 2015, defendants Tang and Liu, in collaboration with a co-conspirator known as \"Fatty\" (whose name and personal information are unknown, currently at large), conspired to commit robbery. After committing the crime, \"Fatty\" drove a motorcycle to facilitate their escape. After getting off the motorcycle, Tang and Liu approached the victim and covered their mouth, wresting them to the ground. Near stores 108-109 on the north road of Shantou City, they robbed the victim, Peng, of a red backpack containing more than 300 yuan and a white Samsung SM-G3508 mobile phone (valued at 350 yuan according to an appraisal). After committing the robbery, Tang, Liu, and \"Fatty\" each received 100 yuan. Tang also obtained the Samsung SM-G3508 mobile phone, and the remaining money was spent by the defendants and the co-conspirator. A few days later, Tang gave the Samsung SM-G3508 phone he had obtained to someone named Yang to use, at room 307 in a certain district in this city. Tang and Liu did not contest these facts during the trial, and the case is corroborated by the victim Peng’s report and statement, witness testimony from Yang, personal identification documents of defendants Tang and Liu, case acceptance records, the decision to file a case, and investigation reports from the public security agency. It is further supported by lists of seized and returned items, explanations related to the handling of the case, the confiscated Samsung SM-G3508 phone, identification records and photographs of the crime scene and stolen goods, an appraisal report from the Shantou Municipal Pricing Bureau on the stolen goods, certificates of qualification for the appraisal agency and appraiser, and the confessions of defendants Tang and Liu. These evidences are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the morning of November 18, 2013, at around 8 o'clock, defendants Ma and Wu went near the old bus station on Qianchuan Street in this district and boarded bus number 21. They stole a wallet from a passenger named Cheng on the bus. They were subsequently discovered and apprehended by bystanders, and the stolen wallet was recovered. In support of these allegations, the prosecution has presented relevant evidence.", "label": {"Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city's Banan District charged that on the morning of November 12, 2013, defendants Liu and Tan, taking advantage of an unguarded moment on bus No. 328 in Yudong, Banan District, of a certain city, with Tan providing cover, Liu used the method of unzipping bags to steal a wallet containing 900 yuan in cash and bank cards from the shoulder bag of the victim, Zhang. The stolen money was used by both individuals. On the morning of November 13, 2013, defendants Liu and Tan again employed the same method on bus No. 328 in Yudong, Banan District, to steal 300 yuan in cash and a senior citizen's card from the shoulder bag of the victim, Yang B. The stolen money was used by both individuals. After the defendants Liu and Tan were brought to justice, they truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. During the trial, defendants Liu and Tan did not dispute the above facts, which were sufficiently supported by evidence such as the case registration form, decision to open a case, household registration information of Liu and Tan, Tan's prior criminal record material, search and identification records, seizure list, explanation of circumstances, course of arrest, testimonies of witnesses Gao, Li, Hou, and Yang A, statements of the victims Zhang and Yang B, and confessions of the defendants Liu and Tan.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accused: At about 9 a.m. on March 5, 2013, the defendant Chen, in order to collect debts, gathered defendants Jin, Gu, and others to take the victim, Zhang, to Room 807 of the Haishang Grand Hotel located on Luotuo Street in this district from Zhenhai Power Generation Co., Ltd. for detention. During this period, the defendants beat the victim Zhang, forcing Zhang to repay 40,000 yuan in cash and write a 30,000 yuan IOU, after which they released him at approximately 5 p.m. on the same day. After appraisal, the injuries sustained by the victim Zhang were determined to constitute minor injuries. Defendant Gu turned himself in to the public security authorities on December 2, 2013, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. To prove the above facts, the public prosecution authority provided relevant evidence to the court.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment"], "Gu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: In the early morning of November 4, 2014, the defendant Yang and the victim Lin had a conflict over trivial matters at a barbecue stall at Zhuxiang No. 1, Chunfeng Village, New District, Wuxi City. Lin injured Yang's forehead with a beer bottle. In retaliation, defendant Yang gathered defendant Xia and Zheng (handled in a separate case) to the scene. Later, defendant Xia dragged Lin, causing him to fall and injure his face, and defendant Yang further punched Lin in the face, causing him injury. According to forensic identification, Lin's dental injury was assessed as minor injury level two, while defendant Yang's head injury was assessed as a minor injury. On November 4, 2014, defendant Yang was arrested by the public security organs, and defendant Xia turned himself in to the public security organs, both truthfully confessing to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, defendants Yang and Xia reached a reconciliation agreement with Lin's side, agreeing that each party would bear their own medical expenses and mutually understanding each other.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that in April 2014, Li Moujia (handled in a separate case) and Guan Moumou signed a technology transfer contract. Because the grinding wheel production process did not meet the contractual agreement, on May 31, 2014, Li Moujia lured Guan Moumou to the office of a certain factory in a town of a certain village in a certain city. Li Moujia instructed the defendants Wang and Song to restrict Guan Moumou's personal freedom and beat him. They demanded Guan Moumou to return a ten thousand yuan technology transfer fee on the grounds of his breach of contract, but to no avail. Later, they demanded Guan Moumou's bank card and password, and Li Moujia withdrew 4,900 yuan in cash from the bank card, and made card purchases worth 4,850 yuan at a supermarket in a certain town of a certain city. They also forced Guan Moumou to sign a note handwritten by Wang, stating the return of ten thousand yuan to a certain factory. Afterwards, Wang and Song to", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Song": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: On March 20, 2015, at noon, Liu (already sentenced) and Cui (already sentenced) had a dispute over trivial matters and agreed to a gang fight through text messaging and phone calls at the entrance of Chanzhong Market on Haibin Street in Longwan District. At around 10 p.m. that day, the defendant Wang, having been called by Liu, arrived at the scene along with several others. The defendant Qin, having been called by Cui, also arrived at the scene along with several others. Cui's group, armed with weapons and wearing masks, engaged in a gang fight against Liu's group. Liu's group, feeling overwhelmed by the larger number of opponents and their possession of weapons, fled due to the disparity in strength, resulting in no casualties. The prosecution has provided corresponding evidence for the above-mentioned charges.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that on the evening of July 22, 2014, defendants Zhang and Lu, while having a late-night meal at the west gate of a town in a certain county, had a dispute with a neighboring table of Cheng. Later, defendants Zhang and Lu assaulted Cheng with beer bottles, causing multiple injuries to Cheng's head and body. According to an assessment, Cheng's injuries reached the level of minor injury of the second degree. After the incident, the two defendants, knowing that someone had called the police, waited at the scene and did not resist arrest. To prove the facts of the charges, the prosecution read and presented evidence in court, including the victim's statement, the confessions of the two defendants, witness testimonies, the on-site inspection records, on-site photos, injury photos, forensic injury assessment report, details of the case, personal information, and the administrative penalty decision.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Zhejiang Province charges: At around 20:00 on August 20, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou went to No. 33, Qianyuan, Yingjia Village, Meilin Street, a certain county, to the home of Ying. Defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Zhang broke the window bars to enter the house, stealing a Lenovo G480 laptop valued at 4,231 RMB, a BBK i266 mobile phone valued at 325 RMB, an iPod touch (8G) valued at 1,115 RMB, a Tianjun 5001G men's watch worth 1,056 RMB, and a camcorder. After the incident, the stolen BBK i266 mobile phone was recovered by the public security organs and returned to the victim. At around 21:00 on October 11, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou went to No. 292, Meilin North Road, Meilin Street, a certain county, where defendant Zhou acted as a lookout while defendant Zhang climbed the gate to enter the yard, then pried the lock to enter Wu's house, stealing a Samsung GT-S5830i mobile phone valued at 664 RMB, a black mobile phone, and an electric bike key. They then used the stolen electric bike key to unlock and steal a red Dayun TDR709Z electric bike, valued at 1,699 RMB, which was parked in the yard by Wu. On October 21, 2013, defendants Zhang and Zhou were apprehended by public security organs. After the incident, the stolen Samsung GT-S5830i mobile phone, electric bike, and key were recovered by the public security organs and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Zhou during the court proceedings and are substantiated by the statements of the victims Ying and Wu, identification records and photos, on-site inspection and examination records and photos, invoices, certificates, sales slips, receipts, anti-theft record information, vehicle purchase documents, price appraisal reports, and lists and photos of seized and returned items, along with arrest records and household registration information, all of which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: 1. On September 21, 2019, at around 20:30, the defendant Liu came alone to the park on Bihai Avenue under the Century Bridge on Haidian Island, Meilan District, Haikou City. Taking advantage of the victim Pu and his girlfriend being unguarded, he stole a Nubia brand phone (model: NX563J) placed next to Pu's right hand. According to appraisal, the stolen Nubia phone was valued at RMB 876. 2. On September 26, 2019, at around 01:30, the defendant Liu came alone to the seaside opposite the Tianyifang Community on Bihai Avenue on Haidian Island. Seizing the opportunity while the victim Zhou was asleep at the seaside, he secretly took a phone from Zhou's hand, which was an IPHONE brand (model: IPHONEXS). According to appraisal, the stolen IPHONE phone was valued at RMB 5431. 3. On November 10, 2019, the defendant Liu and Chen were riding an electric scooter near the Evergrande Beautiful Sha Music Square on Haidian Island when they noticed the victim Li and her boyfriend had placed their phone and shoulder bag on a rattan chair. Chen acted as a lookout while Liu used the greenery as cover to steal an IPHONE brand phone (model: IPHONEXSMAX), a Huawei brand phone (model: Honor 10), and a shoulder bag placed next to Li and her boyfriend. The two phones stolen were sold for a total of RMB 2900, with Liu receiving RMB 2400 and Chen receiving RMB 500. The proceeds were squandered by both. According to appraisal, the stolen IPHONE phone was valued at RMB 6741, and the Huawei phone was valued at RMB 1261, totaling RMB 8002. On December 6, 2019, the defendants Liu and Chen were arrested by the police. The public prosecution agency has provided corresponding evidence for the above charges.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county charged: Starting in April 2014, the defendant Wang introduced Jin on two occasions, and the defendant Liu introduced He on two occasions, to provide prostitution services for patrons at a certain hotel located on a certain street in a certain county. On May 4 and May 5 of the same year, the public security authorities arrested Wang and Liu. The People’s Procuratorate of a certain county submitted relevant evidence to this court, asserting that the defendants Wang and Liu, in disregard of national law, introduced others to engage in prostitution. Their actions violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The criminal facts are clear, and the evidence is solid and sufficient. They should be held criminally accountable for the crime specified in Article X. The court is requested to sentence them in accordance with the law. \n\nDuring the trial, both defendants raised no objections to the criminal facts alleged by the prosecution and admitted guilt in court. The defense counsel for the defendant Wang argued that the Procuratorate of a certain county, in the indictment, held that the facts regarding Wang’s involvement in introducing prostitution were established, and the evidence was basically sufficient. The counsel argued that Wang’s involvement in introducing prostitution was of a short duration and involved relatively few individuals. After being apprehended, Wang truthfully confessed his crime, showed a sincere attitude, and expressed deep remorse. Wang was a first-time offender. The defense requested that the court show leniency and consider a more lenient punishment for Wang.\n\nFollowing a review, this court has ascertained the following: Starting in April 2014, the defendant Wang introduced Jin on two occasions, and the defendant Liu introduced He on two occasions, to a certain hotel located on a certain street in a certain county to provide prostitution services for patrons. On May 4 and May 5 of that year, the public security authorities arrested Wang and Liu. The following evidence submitted by the prosecution substantiates these criminal facts:\n\n1. Record of the registration of the criminal case, proving the origin of the case and substantiating the lawful initiation of investigative procedures by the relevant authorities.\n2. Records of the arrest process, establishing the time and location at which the defendants were apprehended.\n3. Witness testimony: \n   (1) Sex worker He testified that she began engagi", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that from early July to July 16, 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized gatherings for gambling six times with participants such as Miao, Luo, Bao, Wang, Shen, Ling, Qian, and others in various places including a village in this city and on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government in the form of \"Hongxinbao\" gambling, profiting over 9,000 yuan. The specific criminal facts are as follows: \n\n1. One afternoon in early July 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering at a villager's house in Gao Xiang Natural Village, Qinxin Village, Tonglu County, profiting over 2,000 yuan.\n2. The following afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized another gambling gathering at a villager's house at the entrance of a village in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.\n3. On the next afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.\n4. On yet another afternoon, defendants Zong and Sun organized a gambling gathering in an empty house in a village in this city, profiting over 2,000 yuan.\n5. On the afternoons of July 15 and July 16, 2013, defendants Zong and Sun organized gambling gatherings on the bamboo-covered mountain behind the Xukou Town government. Due to the low number of participants and police checks, these two gatherings were of shorter duration, profiting over 1,000 yuan. \n\nAfter the incident, defendants Zong and Sun turned themselves into the police on August 7 and August 14, 2013, respectively. It was further found that defendants Zong and Sun are married. During the trial in this court, defendants Zong and Sun submitted the illegal gains of 9,000 yuan to the court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zong and Sun during the trial and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Miao, Luo, Bao, Wang, Shen, Ling, Qian, the confessions and defenses of defendants Zong and Sun, the administrative penalty decision by the police, the household registration certificates of defendants Zong and Sun, the account of their capture, and other evidence, sufficient to be confirmed.", "label": {"Zong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from late June to late July 2020, the defendants, Fan and Zhang, a married couple, repeatedly allowed and collaborated with Peng in using methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice,\" hereinafter referred to as ice) in their home located in certain village, certain group of certain township. Fan and Zhang jointly allowed and collaborated with Peng to use ice four times, and Fan alone allowed and collaborated with Peng to use ice once. The defendants, Fan and Zhang, have confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts.", "label": {"Fan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: In May 2016, the defendants Luo, Xu, and Li discovered that the back door of a shop at Unit 205, No. 11, Blu-ray Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road, a certain district in a certain city was unlocked while they were wandering around. They then entered the premises and stole six desktop computer towers, subsequently selling them for 1,000 yuan. On May 29, 2016, defendant Luo stole a Samsung phone belonging to Tan from the Sunshine Internet Cafe on Shuxiu East Street, a certain district in a certain city, and sold the phone for 240 yuan. At the end of May 2016, defendant Luo stole a desktop computer from the Kaipeng Decoration store at 11-406, Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road, a certain district in a certain city, and sold it for 50 yuan. On June 4, 2016, defendant Luo stole a desktop computer tower from the Kaipeng Decoration store at 11-406, Xiangjiang International, Binjiang North Road. On June 10, 2016, defendant Luo stole another desktop computer tower from the same location. According to price appraisal: the price of the six stolen Lenovo computer towers from Unit 205, Building 11, Blu-ray Xiangjiang International was 8,520 yuan. The appraisal price of the Kaipeng Decoration company's computers was 7,440 yuan. In summary, defendant Luo was involved in five criminal acts, with a total value of 15,960 yuan, and obtained 620 yuan. Defendants Xu and Li each participated in one theft, with a total value of 8,520 yuan, and obtained 330 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the three defendants during the court trial and were corroborated by evidence such as witness testimonies, criminal photographs, identifications, recognitions, pricing appraisals, and capture descriptions.", "label": {"Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that at around 21:00 on November 1, 2019, the defendants Xia and Yang drove to a certain county, picked up the defendant Chen, and prepared to hunt wild rabbits. When the three of them reached a halfway point on the mountain road, Yang and Chen got out of the car to hunt, while Xia waited in the car by the roadside. During their search for prey, Yang and Chen discovered a hawk in a tree. They used a flashlight they carried to blind the hawk and threw clods of earth to knock it down, capturing it after it fell to the ground. They brought the hawk back to the car, where Xia took a bag from the vehicle and placed the hawk inside. The three of them continued to drive and hunt, but were apprehended by patrolling police officers at a county road junction. According to the assessment, the animal involved was a common buzzard, which is a nationally protected wild animal at Category II. The hawk has been released back into the wild by the police.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 3 p.m. on March 24, 2016, the defendants He and Dai conspired to commit theft and went to Room XXX of an apartment opposite No. XX, XX Road, Xiaoli Village, Dongfeng Town, a certain city. Defendant Dai kicked open the door of that room and stood lookout at the stairway, while defendant He entered the room and stole 75 resident identity cards kept by the victim Zhou, as well as one of Zhou’s handbags (inside which there was a black wallet, an iPhone 5s, a silver bracelet, a necklace inlaid with gold transfer beads, etc., with a total value of 2,570 RMB) and 102.5 RMB in cash. The two fled to an unnamed mobile phone accessories store at XXX Commercial Pedestrian Street in Dongsheng Town and sold the stolen phone for 80 RMB. Later, defendants He and Dai were discovered by the public at the intersection of XX Road and XX Road in Dongsheng Town and were handed over to the public security organ. After the case was solved, the public security organ recovered 72.5 RMB of the stolen money and all the stolen goods and returned them to the victim. These facts were not disputed by defendants He and Dai during the trial and were supported by the statement and identification record of the victim Zhou, the apprehension records, arrest records, transfer certificate issued by the Rongxing Police Station of Dongsheng Branch and Xinhua Police Station of Dongfeng Branch of a certain city's Public Security Bureau, search record, seizure and return item list, scene investigation and inspection record, photos of the seized stolen items, site location map and photos, on-site video recordings and screenshots, the \"Price Appraisal Conclusion\" issued by the Price Certification Center of the Development and Reform Bureau of a certain city, purchase receipts of the stolen items provided by victim Zhou, proof from Jucheng Jewelry Shop of a certain city, on-site urinalysis report of defendants He and Dai, testimony and identification record of witnesses Yuan and Hu, testimony of witness Li, statements and identification records of defendants He and Dai, household registration proof, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the evening of November 10, 2014, the victim, Hu, borrowed 9,700 RMB from the defendant Liu and Chen (handled in a separate case) while gambling. Later, due to losses in gambling, Hu did not repay the borrowed money. To recover the loan, Liu and Yang drove Hu to his temporary residence to get the money. In the room, Hu claimed that he only had 2,000 RMB and no other money for repayment. Liu and Chen conspired to take Hu to the Langkeng Reservoir in Jiangbei of this city to coerce repayment. Liu and Yang forcibly took Hu into a car, covered his head, and drove with Chen to the vicinity of Langkeng Reservoir. They slapped Hu, kicked him, beat him with a steel pipe, and threatened him verbally to force repayment. They also coerced Hu into writing an IOU for 20,000 RMB, and took Hu's 2,000 RMB and an Apple 4S phone valued at 800 RMB. Afterwards, Liu and Yang took Hu to a hotel near a logistics center in this city, restricting his personal freedom and forcing him to repay the money. On the morning of November 11, 2015, Hu escaped from the hotel while Liu and others were asleep. According to the assessment, Hu's injuries were minor. The above facts are corroborated by evidence presented by the public prosecution authority in court and verified through cross-examination, including the victim Hu's statements, witness Dai's testimony, identification records and photos made by the public security organ, outpatient medical records, forensic medical injury assessment, price assessment report, this court’s criminal judgment, arrest record provided by public security police, household registration certificate, and confessions by defendants Liu and Yang regarding the above facts, which are sufficient to determine the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: On October 7, 2017, at approximately 15:50, the defendant Wu, along with defendants Wang, Yu, He, and Fang (handled in a separate case), among others, had a dispute at the bridgehead of a certain village in a certain township of a certain county due to issues regarding project contracting and the blocking of an excavator earlier that morning, which subsequently led to a physical altercation involving punches and kicks, but was later intervened and stopped. Subsequently, Wu, Wang, Yu, and He again erupted into conflict, using a vegetable knife, an axe, a water pipe, and a cutlass, causing minor injuries to Li, another Yu, and Wu. To prove the facts of the charges, the procuratorate presented evidence in court, including physical evidence (photographs), documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert opinions, on-site investigation records and photographs, as well as audiovisual materials.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"], "Yu": ["Detention"], "He": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at around 9 AM on November 6, 2020, Chen of XX Decoration Company at the construction site of a Blu-ray project, along with company personnel, met with the defendant Gou, responsible for Sichuan XX Construction Company, and others at Phase 5 of the project to negotiate the handling of an altercation between their respective companies' personnel, Li and Huang 1, at the construction site. During the negotiation, a conflict erupted, leading to a fight which was later stopped. At around 12 PM that day, the defendant Gou again gathered defendant Tang, Liu, and other Sichuan XX Construction Company staff at the entrance of Phase 2 of the Blu-ray project site on XX street in Shuangliu District of the city. They carried wooden sticks, plastic pipes, safety helmets, and other items to engage in a fight with personnel from XX Decoration Company, resulting in several staff members, including Song, He, and Huang 2, being injured. According to the assessment, the degree of bodily injury to Huang 2 and Huang 1 was classified as minor. At around 3 PM that day, defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the incident, both parties voluntarily reached a reconciliation agreement. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu during the court trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment by signing agreements. These were corroborated by documents including an acceptance registration form and case initiation decision issued by the public security authorities, as well as the on-scene inspection record, scene map, and photographs produced by the public security authority. Additionally, confessions and identifications from defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu, and testimonies from witnesses Chen, Li, Huang 1, Huang 2, Song, He, Shen, Wen, Lang, Luo, Zhang, Tian, another Li, Gao, another Liu, and another Wu, as well as the forensic examination results (certificate numbers [2020] 246 and 247) regarding the degree of bodily injury issued by the physical evidence identification office of Shuangliu District Public Security Bureau, WeChat chat screenshots, call records, medical records, medical condition certificates, letters of understanding, audiovisual materials, and the household registration of defendants Gou, Tang, and Liu, collectively provide sufficient evidence to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Gou": ["Imprisonment"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that between May and June 2015, the defendants Hou and Hu repeatedly committed thefts in various locations such as shopping malls, store entrances, and residential areas in a certain county, stealing bicycles, chickens, gasoline, and other items. The specific facts are as follows: 1. On a day in May 2015, the defendants Hou and Hu stole two live chickens from a vehicle parked by Wei at the Jinqiao Trade City in a certain county. 2. On a day in May 2015, the two defendants stole a folding bicycle belonging to Li from under Unit 1 of Building 2 in the Xinsheng Jiayuan Community, valued at 150 yuan. 3. On an evening in May 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 10 liters of gasoline from the fuel tanks of Hua and Wei's two motorized tricycles parked in front of a spice shop inside the Wucun Market in a certain location. 4. On an evening in June 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 5 liters of gasoline from Chen's tricycle parked in front of the Fumanjin Supermarket on Jianshe Road. 5. On an evening in June 2015, the two defendants stole approximately 5 liters of gasoline from Yan's motorized tricycle parked in front of the Chenghui Aluminum Wholesale Store. These facts are substantiated by the testimonies of the victims, Hua and Chen, presented and cross-examined in court, as well as by the physical evidence photos, arrest records, and household registration documents provided by the public security organs, and the confessions of the two defendants during the investigation phase. The defendants also raised no objections during the court trial, which is sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, the following facts were ascertained: 1. At noon on December 20, 2014, the defendant Xu went to the market in Moshantown, a county in Linyi City, and stole a woman's handbag that Yang had placed in the basket of an electric bicycle, which contained 30 yuan in cash. As Xu was caught in the act, he threw away the handbag and fled. 2. Around 10 a.m. on July 28, 2015, the defendants Xu and Dong followed Liu into the Jinniu Market in Yicheng District. Dong intentionally collided with Liu's electric bicycle, while Xu took the opportunity to steal Liu's wallet, which was hanging on the handlebar of the electric bicycle. It contained 960 yuan in cash, a driver's license, an ID card, and a bank card. 3. Around 9 a.m. on August 22, 2015, defendants Xu and Dong followed Zhao into a town market. Dong intentionally collided with Zhao's electric bicycle, allowing Xu to seize the opportunity to steal Zhao's wallet, which was hanging on the handlebar of the electric bicycle. It contained 10,000 yuan in cash, a pair of gold earrings, an ID card, and a bank card. In summary, the defendant Xu committed theft three times, stealing 10,990 yuan in cash, gold earrings, bank cards, ID cards, and other items. Defendant Dong participated in theft twice, stealing 10,960 yuan in cash, gold earrings, bank cards, ID cards, and other items. These facts were not contested by the defendants Xu and Dong during the trial and were corroborated by the statements of the victims Yang, Liu, Zhao, testimony from four witnesses including Cheng (A) and Cheng (B), confessions from the defendants Xu and Dong, identification records, the criminal judgment, release certificate, and case investigation reports, providing sufficient basis for conviction.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that during January 2014, the defendants Ge and Dong committed three thefts at Jumei Clothing Store and Parkson Shopping Mall in Zhucheng City. They stole cash totaling over 800 yuan as well as bank cards, ID cards, and other items from Sun's wallet; cash totaling 100 yuan and bank cards and other items from Song's wallet; and cash totaling 2300 yuan and bank cards, a driver's license, and other items from Jiang's wallet. The total amount of cash stolen was over 3200 yuan. In support of the above charges, the prosecution also provided evidence including documentary proof of household registration, police reports, arrest records, the criminal judgment, identification transcripts, and victim statements.", "label": {"Ge": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that on September 25, 2016, at approximately 16:00, the defendant Yang, in collaboration with the defendant Wang, went to the home of the victim Zhang in a certain village of a town in Rushan City. They used means such as prying open a window to enter the house and commit theft, stealing 4,900 RMB in cash and a Samsung Note 3 mobile phone. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen property was 5,290 RMB.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate charged that on the evening of July 10, 2015, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Sun, along with Zhang (at large), Wang, and others, went to karaoke room 220 at a KTV on Tianxia Road in Dinghai District, Zhoushan City after drinking. At around 10 pm, defendant Wu went to room 221 where strangers Tang, Fu, and Zhao (all victims) were, and a dispute arose due to a request to drink with them, which led to a fight. Defendant Wang then called defendants Sun and Zhang to help in the fight. Defendants Wu, Wang, Sun, and Zhang punched and kicked Fu and the others, and defendant Wang also used a hot water kettle to hit Tang, Fu, and Zhao. Subsequently, Wu and the others fled the scene. According to the forensic identification of minor injury by the Dinghai District Branch of Zhoushan Public Security Bureau, the injuries of Tang, Fu, and Zhao were all minor. After the incident, the families of defendants Sun and Wang compensated Tang, Fu, and Zhao for medical expenses and other economic losses totaling RMB 32,000, and received the victims' understanding and forgiveness. During the trial, the defendants Wu, Wang, and Sun raised no objections to the above facts, which are corroborated by the statements of victims Tang, Fu, and Zhao; witness testimonies of Zhang, Chen, Zhou, and another Chen; recognition records; evidence retrieval notices; evidence retrieval lists; evidence material acceptance lists; letters of forgiveness; video screenshots; audio-visual material description documents; CDs; arrest processes; explanatory notes; household registration certificates; forensic identification of bodily injury degrees; and expert opinion notices, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that the defendants Zhao and Liu are married and involved in the slaughtering and selling of pigs. Since February 2014, without obtaining the qualification for designated pig slaughtering, the defendants Zhao and Liu illegally slaughtered and retailed over 100 pigs purchased by defendant Zhao in certain villages within a certain town in a certain county, amounting to an illegal operation with revenue exceeding 100,000 yuan. On June 18 of the same year, defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to a police station in a certain county. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Liu during the court trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Li, Yang, Pan, and others; photographs of the slaughtering site; documentary evidence such as notebooks, household registration information, and the details of their capture; and the confessions of defendants Zhao and Liu, all of which are sufficient to make a determination.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on February 12, 2013, at around 13:00, the defendants Pang and Mo, after prior discussion, were at the Jusco shopping mall in Dongfang Square, Chancheng District, a certain city. Defendant Pang was responsible for keeping watch while defendant Mo pickpocketed a Sony Ericsson E15i (X8) mobile phone worth 330 RMB from the victim Liu Yi, which was placed in the victim's coat. After succeeding, defendant Pang was caught red-handed by police. On February 21, 2013, at around 19:00, the police arrested defendant Mo at Dongfang Square. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Mo and Pang during the trial, and are corroborated by victim Liu Yi's report and identification record, testimony and identification records from witnesses Liu Yi 2 and Wang, the price appraisal conclusion, the arrest process, the criminal judgment document, release certificate, household registration proof, and the defendants Mo and Pang's confessions and identification records during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to confirm the allegation.", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on September 29, 2013, at around 19:00, Zhou had a conflict with Guo's fiancée, Zhou Moumou, at Guo's barber shop. The defendant Zhou slapped Zhou Moumou. At around 22:00 the same day, Guo went to the Yunxiang Community Jinxiangyuan Teahouse to find Zhou to discuss the matter of Zhou hitting Zhou Moumou. The two spoke harshly and started fighting again. During the altercation, Guo used a brick to injure Zhou's head and nasal bone. Zhou also used a glass bottle to injure Guo's head and face. According to the forensic evaluation by the Judicial Appraisal Center of Liangzhou District, Wuwei City Public Security Bureau: The injuries of Zhou and Guo were classified as minor injuries. It was further found that the civil matter was settled on November 10, 2013, with Guo compensating Zhou for medical expenses of 10,000 yuan, and both parties reaching mutual understanding. The above facts are confirmed by the victim’s report materials and statement records, case registration form, case filing decision, witness testimonies, hospital medical records, injury photos, injury appraisal documents, letter of understanding, and the confessions and defense of the two defendants, and were verified as true.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: From July 2011 to December 2013, the defendant Du, without permission from the tobacco monopoly department, repeatedly purchased over 7,000 cartons of \"Daqianmen,\" \"Hademen,\" \"Da Fengshou,\" and \"Qinhuai\" brand cigarettes from the defendant Zhang. Du then sold these cigarettes to locations such as \"Zhang A Da Baozi Shop\" in a certain village in a certain town, a certain district, a certain city; \"Original Flavor Hotel\" in Ban Cheng Town, certain district, certain city; \"Xinyuan Supermarket\" in a certain village, certain district, certain city, among others. On December 16, 2013, the defendant Du purchased 700 cartons of \"Hademen\" brand cigarettes and 22 cartons of \"Da Fengshou\" brand cigarettes from the defendant Zhang; and 950 cartons of \"Daqianmen\" brand cigarettes from Liu Jia (handled in a separate case). At around 20:00 on December 17, the defendant Du, along with the defendant Liu, was carrying the cigarettes to the Wang Gou toll station in a certain district of a certain city when they were caught on site by the tobacco department. The evidence submitted by the prosecution to the court includes testimonies from witnesses Liu Yi, Zhang B, and others; accounting books and other documentary evidence; cigarettes and other physical evidence; and the confessions of defendants Du, Zhang, and Liu.", "label": {"Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Guangdong Province charges: To seek illegal profits, the defendants Cao and Wu were employed respectively by a male accomplice and by an accomplice named Gao (both dealt with in separate cases), collaborating to use a set of homemade \"pseudo base station\" equipment (consisting of 1 main unit, 1 laptop, 1 antenna, and 1 power supply) to illegally send text messages to others, disrupting the normal communications of mobile phone users. Around 11:00 a.m. on April 19, 2014, Cao and Wu were caught red-handed with the incriminating evidence while driving a vehicle with license plate A××××× near the Zhujiang New Town area of a certain district in a certain city, illegally sending text messages. According to statistics, a total of 12,614 messages were sent, causing communication disruptions for 12,614 mobile users for less than one hour.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The court, upon examination, found that in October 2015, the defendant Yu, alias Zhang, falsely claimed to be able to process a credit card with a limit of 160,000 yuan, thereby defrauding 3,000 yuan from Yan. Subsequently, the two concocted a scheme to facilitate a non-performing loan of 14 million yuan, promising a personal gain of 3.5 million yuan in cash, charging 4,000 yuan per person, and defrauded individuals such as Fu, Guo Jia, Guo, and Wei out of 32,000 yuan. Yu gained 20,000 yuan, while Yan gained 12,000 yuan. These facts were undisputed by the defendants Yu and Yan during the trial and are corroborated by witness testimonies from victims Guo and Wei, as well as victims Fu, Gao, and Zhao, identification records, a transfer voucher from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a case report and explanatory note from the Raoyang County Public Security Bureau, household registration certificates of defendants Yu and Yan, and other evidence on record, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the morning of February 7, 2015, at around 10 a.m., the defendants Xie, Lin, along with Chen, Zhao (the latter two handled in separate cases), and others, after learning that their friends He and Zhou had been injured by Cheng and others, harbored resentment against Cheng and intended to retaliate. At around 3 p.m. that afternoon, Xie, Lin, Chen, Zhao, and others drove to the vicinity of a gas station in the western part of the city, to the front of Cheng's house, carrying wooden sticks and axes to break the door open. Lin stood guard outside while Xie and others rushed inside, smashing items like wooden doors and televisions. According to the appraisal, the damaged items were valued at a total of 67,413 yuan. On the afternoon of February 9, 2015, at around 6 p.m., defendants Xie and others were passengers in a car driven by Chen. At the intersection of Xiantao Avenue and Sibao Road in the city, they encountered Hu, who was driving a Porsche Cayenne with the license plate 鄂M8C0**, belonging to Cheng. Chen drove the car to collide with the right side of the Cayenne. Subsequently, Xie and others got out of the car with steel pipes and smashed the rear and other parts of the Cayenne. According to the appraisal, the damage to the Cayenne was valued at 34,039 yuan. The prosecution submitted evidence to this court, including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Xie and Lin, to charge defendants Xie and Lin with the crime of intentional destruction of property.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was established that from 2011 to 2014, the defendants Bei and Hu, without having the necessary construction qualifications, partnered to undertake construction projects within the Dongqian Village area. During this period, in order to gain improper benefits, the two, after consulting with each other, gave a total of 200,000 yuan in cash to the village Party branch secretary Song (who has already been sentenced) on two occasions in 2013 and 2014, which Song accepted. Despite knowing that the two did not have the necessary qualifications, Song still allowed them to undertake the projects and provided assistance. It was also found that Song, for accepting the 200,000 yuan cash given by the defendants Bei and Hu in this case, as well as a shopping card worth 10,000 yuan from others, was sentenced by this court to five years and six months imprisonment for the crime of accepting bribes as a non-state functionary, and this judgment has taken effect. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Bei and Hu during the court hearing, and they are sufficiently supported by demographic information, construction agreements, receipts, testimonies from witnesses such as Song and Dong, and records of how the case was brought to trial.", "label": {"Bei": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendants Li and Hu, despite knowing that the use of nitrites could harm human health, added sodium nitrite to the braised pork they produced at home and sold it to the public. On August 3, 2015, police officers from a county public security bureau caught the defendant Li on the spot selling braised pork on a street in a town of the county. Subsequently, they found a half bag of white powder labeled \"sodium nitrite\" at Li's home and caught the defendant Hu selling braised pork at a nearby stall. According to an appraisal, the nitrite residue in the braised pork sold at Li's stall on Jiangba Street was 96.6 mg/kg, while the nitrite residue in the braised pork sold at Hu's stall on Sanhe Street was 94 mg/kg. The half bag of white powder seized from the home of Li and Hu was confirmed to be nitrite. After being brought to justice, the defendants Li and Hu confessed truthfully to their criminal actions. These facts were undisputed by the defendants Li and Hu during the court proceedings and are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Sun, Yang, Zhou, Zhang, Liu, Cheng, and Wang, inspection records, seizure lists and photos, a notification from a county public security bureau, an explanatory note from the criminal police brigade of a county public security bureau, national food safety standards, an inspection report from an entry-exit inspection and quarantine bureau’s plant and food testing center in a certain location, an account of the case progress issued by the criminal police brigade of a county public security bureau, as well as photos and household registration information of the defendants Li and Hu, thus sufficient to establish the charge.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in the early morning of March 9, 2013, the defendants Meng and Li, together with Ma, Du, and Zhang (all of whom have been sentenced), conspired in advance and went to the former Jiaxing Liancheng Fashion Co., Ltd. located on Guangxin Road, Guangchen Town, a city. They entered the factory area by climbing over the wall and used tools such as wire cutters and pliers to steal 20 meters of 4*185 square copper core Chenguang cables (valued at 5,130 yuan), 30 meters of 3*150 square + 1*70 square copper core Chenguang cables (valued at 5,916 yuan), six pieces of 10*0.6*0.1 dm copper bars (valued at 984 yuan), eight 185# copper fasteners (valued at 127 yuan), eight 150# copper fasteners (valued at 100 yuan), and twelve 120# copper fasteners (valued at 129 yuan), totaling a value of 12,386 yuan. The stolen goods were transported by Jin. Additionally, it has been found that the defendants Meng and Li voluntarily surrendered to the Caoqiao Police Station of a city's Public Security Bureau on January 11 and January 14, 2016, respectively. After arriving, they both truthfully confessed their criminal acts. Their accomplices Zhang and Jin returned a total of 6,000 yuan of stolen goods, and the defendant Meng returned 6,386 yuan, which has all been returned to the victimized unit. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Meng and Li during the trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, theft report, statement of the victim, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, site investigation materials, price appraisal opinion, list of seized and returned items, administrative penalty decision by the public security, account of how they appeared in the case, criminal judgment, identity documents, and explanatory notes, all of which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around midnight on July 14, 2014, the defendants Wang and Wen, along with friends, went to a certain residence opposite a bank in a certain town of a certain county to drink beer. During this time, a dispute arose between the victim, Qi Mouhua, who was drinking at a neighboring table with Zhang and others, and Wang, Wen, and their group over trivial matters, leading to a fight. During the altercation, Wen held Qi Mouhua, and Wang struck Qi Mouhua on the right side of the face with a beer bottle, causing injury. According to an assessment, the degree of Qi Mouhua's injuries constituted a level-one minor injury.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: Starting from October 2013, defendants Wu, Wang, and Hu, after discussions, set up a coin-operated gaming machine in a convenience store located at Building X, X No., Dong'an Building, Jinguang Village, Xianjiang Street, a certain city, for gambling purposes. Defendant Wu provided the gaming machine and maintenance services, while defendants Wang and Hu, a couple, provided the venue and daily management. The profits were split equally between both parties. On the morning of May 8, 2014, this gaming machine site was raided by the public security authorities, who seized one \"Yearly Surplus\" brand gaming machine and coins amounting to 639 yuan. By the time of the raid, the gaming machine setup site had profited approximately 18,000 yuan. According to the appraisal, the \"Yearly Surplus\" gaming machine had one operation position, with functions for coin insertion, coin return, and screen scoring. The machine had odds selection settings, allowing small bets for large rewards, classifying it as a gambling machine. On the morning of May 8, 2014, defendants Wang and Hu were summoned to the scene by public security personnel; on May 16, 2014, defendant Wu turned himself in at the Xianjiang Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. Currently, 12,000 yuan from each of defendants Wu and Wang is temporarily held by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Wu, Wang, and Hu had no objections during the court hearing, are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ye, Jin, Wei, Rao, and Huang, the identification records, on-site inspection records, case registration form, arrest record, evidence preservation list, administrative penalty decision, household registration proof, temporary seizure receipt, and the gaming facility and equipment appraisal opinion, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that: On January 20, 2015, at approximately 18:48, the defendant Wang was driving a red Audi and proceeding straight at the traffic lights near the Erqi Light Rail Station on Jiefang Avenue in Jiang'an District of a certain city. He encountered the victim Zhou, who was also driving in the same direction in a white Chevrolet SUV and suddenly changed lanes to the right, causing Wang to brake urgently. Subsequently, while continuing to drive, Zhou deliberately blocked the passing route with his car to prevent Wang from overtaking. In an intent to teach Zhou a lesson, the defendant Wang called her husband, the defendant Xiong, who instructed Wang to follow the car as he would come over immediately. Wang then tailed Zhou's white Chevrolet SUV over the Erqi Bridge, taking a detour through Huanle Avenue and Tuanjie Avenue towards home. During this time, Xiong, using the vehicle description provided by Wang, drove a gray Mercedes from under Huanle Avenue Viaduct and started tailing the white Chevrolet SUV towards Wuhan Railway Station, calling Wang to tell her to head home. At approximately 19:07 the same day, when the victim Zhou parked in Lot 3 at Wuhan Railway Station and got out of the vehicle, Xiong, accompanied by \"Huzi\" and \"Heipi,\" emerged from a parking space, wielding a pickaxe handle, and chased Zhou and Yu, who was seated in the front passenger seat, causing injuries to both Zhou and Yu. According to the forensic assessment, Zhou sustained minor injuries of Grade 1, while Yu sustained minor injuries. On January 21, 2015, the defendant Wang was apprehended by the police, and on February 28 of the same year, Xiong voluntarily surrendered to the police. After the incident, both parties reached a compensation settlement agreement.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate alleges: On the afternoon of November 13, 2013, defendants Gao and Wang provided a room at a certain hotel in a certain city, where Gao's friend Lei was staying, for Liu (A), Xiao, and Liu (B) to use drugs. Gao also purchased drug paraphernalia, such as straws and tinfoil. The following afternoon, defendant Gao renewed the room reservation, and that night again provided a venue for Xiao, Liang, and Lin to use drugs. According to the evaluation, methamphetamine components were detected in the urine of defendants Gao, Wang, as well as Xiao, Liu (A), Liang, Lei. The defendants Gao and Wang raised no objection to the above facts during the court proceedings, and these facts are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Liu (A), Xiao, Liang, Lei, and Liu (B); expert opinions; physical evidence; documentary evidence, and other proofs, sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Starting in September 2015, the defendant Liu established a WeChat group on the WeChat platform (the group was named \"Watching Movies\" and later renamed \"Refugee Camp,\" with the defendant Liu as the group owner, WeChat ID ×××, nickname \"This one, Mr. Liu\"). The defendants Yan, Li, Zhou, and others were members of the \"Refugee Camp\" WeChat group. From early October to November 2015, the defendants Liu, Yan (WeChat ID ×××, nickname \"Flower Monk\"), Li (WeChat ID ×××, nickname \"Take Things as They Come\"), and Zhou (WeChat ID ×××, nickname \"I'm a Pervert—Who's Afraid of Me\") successively sent 196 obscene videos in the \"Refugee Camp\" WeChat group (among which the defendant Liu sent 54 obscene videos, the defendant Yan sent 49, the defendant Li sent 47, and the defendant Zhou sent 46). The actions of the defendants Liu, Yan, Li, and Zhou all violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. The defendant Liu is identified as the principal offender, and the defendants Yan, Li, and Zhou as accomplices. The defendant Yan has a confession as a mitigating circumstance. It is requested to impose a sentence according to the law. The above facts were undisputed by the defendants Liu, Yan, Li, and Zhou during the trial, and are substantiated by the following evidence provided by the prosecution and verified in court: 1. Household registration information; 2. Confessions of the defendants Liu, Yan, Li, and Zhou; 3. Testimony of the witness Gao; 4. Seizure decision and item return list; 5. Appraisal report on obscene materials; 6. Records of electronic evidence examination; 7. Two CDs; 8. Screenshots from mobile phones; 9. Evidence receipt list; 10. Returned item list and photos of mobile phones; 11. Details of the arrest; 12. Previous criminal judgment of the defendant Yan, among others. The evidence is true, sufficient, and adequate for conviction.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Yan": ["Detention"], "Li": ["Detention"], "Zhou": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that defendant Shen drove his small car with the license plate number SuB××××× one night in early February 2014. When he reached the roundabout in front of \"Wuxi Dongfang Driving School\" at 490 Qiangzhai Road, ShuoFang, New District, a traffic accident occurred. Since the small car was uninsured, defendant Shen consulted with defendant Xia, and on February 7, 2014, they purchased insurance for the car from the Wuxi branch of China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd., with the coverage period from February 8, 2014, to February 7, 2015. On February 9, 2014, defendant Xia falsely claimed to the Wuxi branch of China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. that the small car with license plate SuB××××× had a traffic accident on that day. On May 23, 2014, the insurance company paid defendant Shen an insurance settlement of 35,000 yuan. After being brought to justice, defendants Shen and Xia truthfully confessed their crime of insurance fraud. The illicit money has been recovered by the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants during the court trial and were supported by physical evidence such as photographs collected by the Chong'an Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, documentary evidence including reports collected by the same branch, witness testimonies by individuals such as Wang Jia, Wang Yi, and Wen, the identification records made by the branch, phone recordings collected by the branch, and the confessions of defendants Shen and Xia. The basic residential information confirmed the identities of defendants Shen and Xia. The criminal judgment confirmed defendant Xia's prior criminal record.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Defendant Zhu had no objection to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution, but argued that both Zhu and Su were living in difficult circumstances and could not afford to raise the children, so they wanted to give them to others to raise. The money was voluntarily given by others as a nutrition fee, without the purpose of making illegal profits. Defendant Su, on the other hand, objected to the criminal facts charged by the prosecution, arguing that it was not for the purpose of selling the children and that they did not discuss it with Zhu. Su claimed to know about the first instance where the child was given to someone else but was unaware of the second instance. After trial, the court found the following facts: 1. In December 2013, Defendants Zhu and Su, colluded in a hospital in a new urban district to sell their newborn boy to \"Wang\" (to be dealt with in another case) for the price of 13,000 yuan through an introduction by Shen (to be dealt with in another case). 2. On a particular day in March 2015, Defendants Zhu and Su, in their home at a residential community unit in the new urban district, sold their newborn baby girl for 20,000 yuan to Lian (to be dealt with in another case) through the mutual introduction by Zhang, Zhang, Shi, and Li (all to be dealt with in other cases). 3. On a particular day in September 2015, Defendant Zhu sold his three-year-old son Mao for 38,000 yuan to Li (to be dealt with in another case) through contact facilitated by He (to be dealt with in a", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain state's Economic and Technological Development Zone charged that at around 12:00 AM on May 2, 2017, defendants Shao and Wang, along with friends Dai and Zhang, went to Changxiang KTV in a town within the Economic and Technological Development Zone of a certain state to sing after drinking. Due to closing time, they left the KTV private room after being persuaded by the victim, Jiang, and went to the bar at the entrance to buy ice cream before leaving. Feeling disgraced for not having fully enjoyed singing, the four returned to the KTV to demand a refund for the ice cream from the victim, Jiang, who then called the police. Defendants Shao and Wang, upon seeing this, assaulted the victim, Jiang, by punching and kicking, resulting in Jiang suffering bilateral nasal bone fractures with nasal septum fracture. According to the forensic identification by the Jiangsu Province Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, the injury to the victim, Jiang, constituted a level 2 minor injury. After the incident, defendants Shao and Wang turned themselves in and truthfully confessed their crimes. Defendants Shao and Wang compensated the victim, Jiang, with 60,000 RMB. It was further discovered that on May 16, 2017, the victim, Jiang, issued a letter of forgiveness, expressing forgiveness for the actions of defendants Shao and Wang. The aforementioned facts are confirmed by defendants Shao and Wang during the trial, with no objections, and are substantiated by their confessions to the public security bureau, the statement of the absent victim, Jiang, the testimony of absent witnesses Dai and Zhang, identification records and photographs, the forensic appraisal report, the letter of forgiveness, the receipt, the capture process, and basic demographic information, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 9:00 PM on July 21, 2015, defendants Cheng, Li, and Wei were riding a red light motorcycle with the license plate number G×××××, driven by defendant Cheng, when they arrived at the vicinity of the Shierli Gas Station in Duohu Street, Jindong District, Jinhua City. They saw the victims, Jiang (a mother) and Chen (a daughter), riding an electric scooter, with Chen carrying a black crossbody bag. After conspiring, Cheng accelerated the motorcycle to approach the victims, while Wei, seated at the back, attempted to snatch the bag. During the struggle, the strap of the black crossbody bag broke, causing the electric scooter to fall and get damaged, and injuring the victims Jiang and Chen. The three defendants failed to obtain the crossbody bag and fled the scene. According to Jinhua City Jindong District Price Certification Center, the damage to the left rear-view mirror of the Limang brand electric scooter was valued at 15 yuan. Jinhua City Public Security Forensic Appraisal Center determined that the injuries sustained by the victims Jiang and Chen were minor. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Cheng, Li, and Wei during the trial, and were corroborated by the confessions of defendants Cheng, Li, and Wei, the basic information of the permanent population, the statements of victims Jiang and Chen, the testimonies of witnesses Fang and Liu, the forensic appraisal report of human injuries by Jinhua City Public Security Forensic Appraisal Center, the price appraisal conclusion by Jinhua City Jindong District Price Certification Center, inspection and identification records, photos, the process of capture and investigation, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tongzhou District in a certain city charges that on November 12, 2015, at around 6:00 a.m., the defendant Han, while driving a motorcycle with the defendant Liu as a passenger, nearly collided with a moped driven by the victim Qu Mouyi on a cement road near Group Sixteen, Wuma Road Village, Dongshe Town. An argument ensued between the two parties. The defendants Han and Liu physically assaulted the victim Qu Mouyi by punching and kicking him. When the victim Qu Mouyi cried for help, the defendants fled the scene. It was determined that the victim Qu Mouyi sustained a level-one minor injury. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution provides the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: Motor vehicle information retrieved by the Public Security Bureau of Tongzhou District in the city, medical records of the victim Qu Mouyi, etc.; 2. Statement of the victim Qu Mouyi; 3. Testimonies of witnesses Dan and Qu Mouding; 4. Forensic opinion on the degre", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guangdong Province charges: On June 1, 2015, at around 8 a.m., the defendants Sun and Qiao, along with \"Ayin\" or \"Sister,\" and \"Long\" or \"Feiji\" (both are being dealt with in separate cases), took a car driven by Wang from a certain city to the vicinity of Yuetang Village Committee, Shaping Street, in a certain city. They targeted the victim, Huang, for their crime. Sun, Qiao, and \"Ayin\" or \"Sister\" deceived Huang using a money-switching trick to gain his trust and then took the opportunity to steal Huang's handbag, which contained a China Agricultural Bank card and cash ranging from RMB 300 to 400. Later, \"Long\" or \"Feiji\" used Huang's bank card to withdraw RMB 9,000 from the China Agricultural Bank Heshan Branch, with Sun receiving RMB 1,200 and Qiao receiving RMB 1,300. On the 29th of the same month, public security officers apprehended defendants Sun and Qiao, confiscating RMB 1,200 and RMB 1,300 from their respective possessions. After the incident, the RMB 2,500 was returned to the victim. The actions of defendants Sun and Qiao have violated Article X of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for the offense of X. After arriving at the case, defendants Sun and Qiao truthfully confessed their crimes, which may warrant a mitigated punishment. It is recommended that the court sentence defendants Sun and Qiao to imprisonment for six months to one year and six months, along with a fine. The court is requested to impose punishment according to the law. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Qiao during the trial and are substantiated by evidence such as the apprehension and case-solving process, relevant documentary evidence, testimonies from witnesses Wang and Li, statements from the victim Huang, confessions from defendants Sun and Qiao, expert opinions, identification records and photographs, and audiovisual materials of the crime scene investigation, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that Wuhan Jinjinhong Economic and Trade Development Co., Ltd., under the guise of management, designated logistics points for the delivery of goods within the central market of a certain city's Hanzheng Street, thus deriving profits. On September 13, 2015, at around 13:00, due to a conflict involving the shipment of goods with the security guards of the central market, the family members of the victim, Chen C — specifically Chen B and Song — were involved in a confrontation. Upon learning of this situation, the defendant Cheng, along with defendants Jiang, Liu, and more than 10 others, armed with weapons like fish spears and batons, went to the intersection of Dajia Street and Quanxin Street on Hanzheng Street in this city, injuring the victim, Chen C, and Song. According to the forensic identification, the extent of injury to the victim Chen C was determined to be minor. On October 27 and 28, 2015, the public security authorities apprehended defendants Cheng and Jiang, respectively. On November 6, 2015, the public security authorities apprehended defendant Liu. After the incident, Cheng’s family actively compensated the victim, Chen C, for the economic losses, gaining the victim’s understanding. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Cheng, Jiang, and Liu during the court hearing and were corroborated by the victim Chen C’s report and statement, the testimonies of witnesses Chen A, Wang, Tan, Chen D, Peng, and Wu, along with identification records, the criminal judgment, statement of circumstances, identity documents, forensic appraisal report, criminal reconciliation letter, receipts, surveillance videos, and accounts of the case resolution and capture process, which are sufficient to establish the case. The defense counsel for defendant Cheng did not object to the prosecution's charge against defendant Cheng for committing a certain crime, acknowledged Cheng’s good attitude in admitting guilt, his compensation for the victim's economic losses, and obtaining the victim's understanding, and requested the court to impose a lighter penalty on him.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that since 2015, defendants Zhang, Fan, Guo, Liu, Ma, and Zheng, among others, successively joined an illegal pyramid scheme organization and engaged in illegal pyramid scheme activities. They rented Room 601, No. 4 Longchuan Middle Road, Zhongcheng, Xinluo District, a certain city, as a base for the illegal scheme. They lured victims Huang, Lu, Deng, and others from other places to this location under false pretenses such as job offers, matchmaking, and business opportunities. Subsequently, to force these individuals to join the illegal pyramid scheme organization, defendants Zhang, Fan, Guo, Liu, Ma, and Zheng resorted to threats, intimidation, and rotating shifts of surveillance to restrict the personal freedom of victims Huang, Lu, Deng, and others. Among them, victim Huang was unlawfully confined for 39 days, victim Lu for 37 days, and victim Deng for 5 days. On June 12, 2015, law enforcement officers captured defendants Zhang, Fan, Guo, Liu, Ma, and Zheng at the scene of the pyramid scheme base. The defendants raised no objections to the above-mentioned facts during the trial. This is corroborated by household registration documents, apprehension records, testimonies of witnesses Wei and Chen, statements from victims Huang, Lu, and Deng, and confessions from defendants Zhang, Fan, Guo, Liu, Ma, and Zheng, which provide sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 10 PM on December 21, 2012, the defendants Gong, Xu, along with a certain Xu from a village (handled in a separate case) and others, were singing at Pattaya KTV in a certain county when a dispute occurred due to the damage of a microphone, for which KTV employees demanded compensation. At around 1 AM the next day, the defendants Gong, Xu, along with a certain Xu, intercepted and assaulted the Pattaya KTV employee Zheng who was going home from work in front of \"Golden Turtle Pastry\" on a certain road in the county, causing him to suffer from a fracture of the right nasal bone and a comminuted fracture of the frontal process of the left maxilla, which constituted minor injuries. On February 5, 2013, the defendant Xu turned himself in to the county public security bureau. It was further found that the defendant Xu reached an agreement with the victim to compensate for the economic loss with 30,000 yuan, and the victim expressed understanding towards the defendants Gong, Xu. The facts charged by the prosecution are consistent with the facts found by this court. The defendants Gong, Xu had no objections during the trial, and the testimony of the victim Zheng, witness Yang, and a certain Xu was provided; evidence such as the injury assessment of the victim Zheng, the mediation agreement, the course of the arrest, the household registration certificate; and the confessions of the defendants Gong, Xu were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Gong": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 8:00 PM on September 21, 2013, defendants Yao, Dai, and He, in pursuit of a gambling debt, took a person referred to as Kong from a certain village in our city to room 310 and room 410 of a luxury inn located in another village and town, where they detained him. During this period, Kong was beaten, resulting in minor injuries. On September 26, at around 4:00 PM, Kong was rescued by public security personnel. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by the defendants Yao, Dai, and He during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by the statements of the victim Kong, testimonies of witnesses Huang and Lin, expert conclusions, on-site photographs, and details of the arrest, which are sufficient to confirm the case.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that from March to November 2013, the defendants Qiu and Zhang, a married couple, operated a foot massage parlor in a town of a certain county. During this period, they accommodated multiple prostitutes in their establishment for prostitution activities. The two defendants provided the prostitutes with a venue for prostitution and convenience for food and lodging, negotiated the prices with clients, and collected the fees. The fees collected were split in a 40-60 ratio between the defendants and the prostitutes. During the operation of the foot massage parlor, defendant Qiu's accommodation of prostitution activities did not lead to serious social consequences. Defendant Zhang's criminal circumstances were considered minor. The public prosecution presented evidence such as witness testimonies, business licenses of individual proprietors, and household registration information in court to substantiate the aforementioned facts.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that, starting from October 2014, the defendants Yang and Dong engaged in gambling by accepting bets from others in the form of \"Mark Six\" in the house they rented located in Alley **, Qianchen Dama Lane, Shuangyu Street, within this district. Participants selected numbers, zodiac signs, etc., based on the betting and winning list for gambling. Defendants Yang and Dong collected gambling funds and kept records, settling wins and losses with participants based on odds and results determined by the gambling websites www.6y7y.com and www.5949.com, thereby profiting from it. On December 23 of the same year, the defendants Yang and Dong were apprehended at the above location. By the time the case was discovered, the two defendants had accepted bets of three or more periods from individuals such as Ma, Guo, Tan, Zeng, and others, with the total betting amount reaching RMB 26,405. The above facts were undisputed by the two defendants during the court trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Ma, Guo, Tan, Zeng, as well as inspection records, identification records, a laptop, the betting and winning list, the gambling funds involved, a seizure list, evidence preservation list, bills, a confiscation list of items, case capture process, population information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: From March 2019 until the case was uncovered, defendants Chai, Zhu, and Wang operated the Dingxiang Foot Bath Shop in a certain district of a certain city. During this time, they harbored individuals such as Ou1, Nong, Ou2, Ou3, and Zhou for the purpose of prostitution. Starting from mid-May 2019, defendant Sun was responsible for the daily management of the foot bath shop, while defendant Yao was in charge of cashier duties, bookkeeping, and acting as a lookout. From mid-May 2019 until the case was uncovered, the foot bath shop illegally earned over 30,000 RMB. The evidence for the charges includes documentary evidence; witness testimonies; inspection records, identification records; transaction details (on CD); and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Chai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "During the trial, it was found that on the morning of May 8, 2016, the defendants Zhang and Han went to No. 160, Panzhong Village, Jiangdong Street, Yiwu City. They climbed up the stairs to the second-floor room, and taking advantage of no one being around, they used a key to unlock the padlock and entered the victim He's room, stealing an iPad 2 Mini (valued at 1,480 RMB) placed in the room. At noon on May 15 of the same year, defendant Zhang went to the third floor of No. X, Jiuliandi, Jiangdong Street, Yiwu City. Seizing the moment when no one was around, he used a key to unlock the padlock and entered the victim Fu's room, stealing an iPhone 4 (valued at 200 RMB) and a Flyco electric shaver (valued at 10 RMB) placed in the room. The phone and shaver have now been recovered and returned to the victim. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Han during the court trial, and are evidenced by the statements of victims He and Fu, an appraisal opinion on valuation, on-site records, on-site identification records and photos, on-site inspection notes and photos, a list of seized items and photos, a list of returned items, explanatory notes, the account of the case, as well as the statements and identification of defendants Zhang and Han, which are sufficient to determine the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: \n\n1. From September 2012 to May 2013, the defendant Zhang used a computer and the internet at his home in Room 301, Building 3, Shijia High-rise, a certain place in a certain town, county, and province, to open an agent account on the \"Di Yuan Club\" gambling platform. He extensively developed sub-agents and members to earn commission rebates from the gambling platform. As of May 16, 2013, when he was apprehended, the defendant Zhang had illegally profited over 780,000 yuan from this gambling platform.\n\n2. From November 2012 to April 2013, the defendant Jin, introduced by Zhang, used a computer and the internet at his temporary residence at No. 8, Lane 6, Pinghai Road, Ninghai County, to open an agent account on the \"Di Yuan Club\" gambling platform. He also extensively developed sub-agents and members to earn commission rebates from the platform. As of April 25, 2013, when he was apprehended, the defendant Jin had illegally profited over 350,000 yuan from this gambling platform.\n\nThis case was uncovered following a report from participants of the gambling activity. After being brought to justice, the defendants Zhang and Jin truthfully confessed to their criminal activities. Defendant Zhang returned illegal gains of 602,000 yuan, while defendant Jin returned illegal gains totaling 350,000 yuan. The crime tools, including two laptops, two desktop computers, one USB-Shield device, and the aforementioned funds (except for 6,621.49 yuan temporarily held by this court), were all lawfully confiscated by the public security authorities.\n\nThese facts, to which defendants Zhang and Jin raised no objections during the trial, are corroborated by the confessions of defendants Zhang and Jin, testimonies from witnesses Diao, Wang, and Wu, search records, lists of seized items, photos of physical evidence, screenshots of the gambling platform and computer pages, bank account detail lists, online banking transaction records, forensic examination reports from the Yangzhou Public Security Bureau Electronic Evidence Examination Center, case registration forms, details of the case occurrence and the apprehension process, explanatory notes, telephone inquiry records, photocopies of identity documents, household registration data, and other evidence sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city of Guizhou Province charged that on the morning of June 19, 2013, the defendants Peng and Yang brought the victims Wang and Xiao to Yang's rented apartment near a certain company's cave in a district of the city. Wang requested to go home, but Peng did not allow it and confined Xiao and Wang within the house. The next morning, Zhu (already sentenced) came to the rented apartment and saw Peng, Yang, Wang, and Xiao together. That evening, Zhu returned to the rented apartment to rest. Around 8 a.m. on the 21st of the same month, Wang requested to go outside to buy medicine; Peng, Yang, and others did not allow this and instructed Zhu and Shen (handled in another case) to confine Wang and Xiao. During this time, Zhu beat Wang with a replica gun, and Yang beat Xiao. That afternoon, Wang sent a distress message to a relative, and police officers arrived at the crime scene at 5 p.m. to rescue Wang and Xiao, and arrested Zhu and others. Subsequently, the defendants Peng and Yang were brought to justice. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Peng and Yang during the trial process. Additionally, there is evidence from the victim's statements, witness testimonies, arrest records, situation explanations, a list of seized and returned items, site identification records and crime scene photos, household registration certificates of the defendants Peng and Yang, and their confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jiangsu Province accused and the court has also verified that on the afternoon of December 16, 2014, defendants Cheng and Wu stole a black Dongfang Star brand motor scooter parked at No. 1468 Taihe International Building, Qianjin West Road, Yushan Town, the same city, belonging to the victim, Jin, with a value of 2,547 RMB. The court also found that after their arrest, defendants Cheng and Wu both truthfully confessed their crimes. After the incident, the police seized from defendant Cheng five T-shaped prying tools, two L-shaped prying tools, one three-prong socket, three screwdrivers, and one pair of scissors. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, defendant Wu compensated the victim Jin for his economic losses and obtained his understanding. These facts were undisputed by defendants Cheng and Wu during the trial process and were corroborated by the victim Jin's statements, witness Wang's testimony, identification records, search records, seizure list, surveillance video, evidence retrieval notifications, evidence retrieval list, vehicle registration certificate, invoice, monitoring videos, a price verification report issued by the city's Price Certification Center, administrative penalty decision, criminal judgment, release certificate, letter of understanding, situation report, criminal photos, arrest process, identity information, and other evidence, sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 12:00 on July 11, 2015, defendants Han and Liang conspired to commit theft. Han drove a white Ghost Fire motorcycle with Liang, searching for a target in a certain city's downtown area. When Han and Liang reached Zhongxin Square in Jianjiang District of the city, they spotted a mountain bike belonging to Huang parked at the square’s parking lot. Han stood watch nearby while Liang attempted to break the bike lock with a hammer that had a wooden handle. Unable to break the lock, Liang handed the hammer to Han, who continued to break the bike lock with the hammer. Han then broke the lock, after which Liang rode the stolen bike away with Han, escaping the scene. Later, they stored the stolen bike at Liang's home. According to the city's Price Appraisal Center, the stolen bike was valued at 3,420 RMB. It was further found that after the incident, the police seized the stolen mountain bike from Liang's home and returned it to its owner, Huang. Additionally, it was determined that Han and Liang were detained on July 13, 2015, due to this case and were administratively detained for fifteen days. During the trial, Han and Liang voluntarily paid fines of 2,000 RMB each to the court through their families. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Han and Liang during the court trial and were evidenced by the case registration form, case filing decision, arrest process, household registration data, vehicle invoice; victim Huang's statement; defendants Han and Liang’s confessions and defenses; on-site inspection records, site maps and photographs, identification records; seizure and return list and photographs of stolen goods; the Price Appraisal Center’s item price identification conclusion document (2015) No. 385 and the notification of the identification conclusion; administrative penalty decision document, suspect illegal crime inquiry registration form, proof materials, fine receipts from the court, all verified through court cross-examination as valid evidence confirmed by this court.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charges: On the evening of January 20, 2014, defendants Wang and Li, after premeditation, used the method of pulling out trees by hand to steal four azalea bonsai trees from the field of victim Yao in Jiakou Village, a certain town in a certain city. The trees were valued at 2,650 RMB. On the same evening, defendants Wang and Li used the same method to steal four azalea bonsai trees (some were not assessed due to the lack of physical evidence) from the field of victim Weng in another village of a certain town in the same city, valued at 2,740 RMB. After the incident, seven of the stolen azalea bonsai trees were recovered and returned to the victims.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 4 a.m. on June 16, 2015, the defendants Wang and Qian, after drinking, left the Phoebe Bar on Hengshan Road in this city. They hailed a taxi driven by the victim, Lu, with the license plate Shanghai FVXX**. Upon getting off at the intersection of South Tibet Road and Shouning Road in this city, the victim Lu requested payment of 26 yuan, as shown on the taxi meter. Defendant Wang attempted to bargain the fare. After being refused, the two defendants proceeded to punch the victim Lu in the head and body, causing injuries to various parts of Lu's face and body. The police later arrived at the scene to handle the situation and apprehended both defendants. According to forensic identification, the victim Lu sustained fractures of both nasal bones and bilateral frontal process fractures of the maxilla due to the trauma, constituting minor injuries. After being brought to justice, the two defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts and, with family assistance, compensated the victim Lu with a total of 97,000 yuan for medical expenses and other costs, gaining the victim's understanding.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Qian": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on August 21, 2014, at around 9 a.m., the defendant Zhang, due to an economic dispute with Li Moumou, sought to collect a debt and thus gathered the defendant Tan, as well as Zhang Moujia (phonetic, dealt with in a separate case), and Jiang Mou (phonetic, dealt with in a separate case) to forcibly take Li Moumou from a road in the New District of a certain city in a certain province into a car and then detained him at locations such as Lemon Guest House, Super 8 Hotel, etc.; from the Jinan-Qingdao Expressway to a certain place, passing through a Zhou service area, because Li Moumou tried to escape, the defendants Zhang and Tan beat him by punching and kicking to control and hold him until about 9:20 a.m. on August 25, 2014, when the public security organ received a report from the victim's relatives and rescued Li Moumou from the Super 8 Hotel in a certain city, resulting in illegal detention lasting 96 hours. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Tan during the trial, and are confirmed by evidence such as documentary evidence showing detailed inquiries of permanent residents, arrest explanations, case handling notes, hotel checkout receipts, testimonies of witnesses Li Moumou and Jiang Moumou, statements from the victim Li Moumou, as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhang and Tan, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on March 8, 2020, at around 11 p.m., the defendant Wu was driving a small off-road vehicle with license plate Q××××× in a certain area, traveling west to east on Honghe Avenue, Yicheng, Zhumadian City. At the intersection of Honghe Avenue and Jinshan Road, it collided with a small passenger car with license plate Lu Q××××× driven by the victim, Fan (33 years old at the time of death), causing Fan to be thrown out of the car. Fan was subsequently run over by a small car with license plate Q×××××, driven by the defendant Wang in a certain area, traveling east to west along Honghe Avenue. Despite rescue efforts, Fan died. An assessment determined that the vehicle driven by defendant Wu was traveling at 98 km/h at the time of the accident, while the vehicle driven by defendant Fan was traveling at 74 km/h. The victim, Fan, died from severe cranial trauma due to the traffic accident, and his blood sample showed an ethanol content of 239.54 mg/100 ml. Furthermore", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In December 2014, defendants Hu and Chen conspired to set up a gambling den six times in the chess and card room operated by defendant Hua at 401, South Ladder, Building 20, Wenqiao Li, Danghu Street, a certain city. Defendants Hu and Chen were responsible for collecting profits and organizing the games, while defendants Hu and Hua were responsible for contacting gamblers. They gathered Chen A, Xie, Zhu, and others to gamble using the \"Tongzi Gong\" method, illegally earning more than 8,000 yuan. Additionally, it was found that on the morning of February 2, 2015, defendant Hua surrendered to the Lindai Police Station of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his crimes. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Hu, Chen, and Hua during the court trial, and are supported by evidence such as the case registration form, witness testimonies, the process of bringing the case, explanations, public security administrative punishment decision, proof of inquiry into unlawful and criminal history, and identification documents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hua": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in mid-July 2012, the defendants Chen and Xu, along with Tan and Yang (both already sentenced), opened a casino near the Shihwan Oil Depot section on Jiangbin Road, Chancheng District, in a certain city. Tan managed the gambling den, and the four of them collaborated and coordinated with each other. Tan and Yang dealt cards and collected rakes, while the defendants Chen and Xu kept watch. This casino operated by gambling on \"San Gong\" where bigger cards win, and it profited through raking in funds. At around 19:00 on August 13, 2012, the police discovered this gambling den at the aforementioned location and seized related gambling tools and RMB 14,600 in gambling funds on the spot. At around 10:00 on July 1, 2013, defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the police. At around 10:00 on July 12, 2013, defendant Xu also voluntarily surrendered to the police. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Xu during the court hearing and were verified by the testimonies and identification records of witnesses Wu, Li, and Zhang, the testimony of witness Deng, inspection records by the Chancheng Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, a list of seized items and photos of the seized items, the circumstances of the arrest, household registration certificates, judgment and release certificates, confessions by co-defendants Tan and Yang, and the confessions of the defendants Chen and Xu. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to confirm the verdict.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that in the early morning of April 29, 2017, defendants Liu and Che and others were eating and drinking in front of Xiaoyang Barbecue in a certain district of a certain city. During this time, defendant Liu got into a verbal altercation with victim Sun due to a car-moving incident. Defendant Che, seeing the situation, stepped forward and scuffled with victim Sun, during which Sun hit Che on the head with a beer bottle. Subsequently, defendants Liu and Che used beer bottles to jointly assault victim Sun, causing Sun to suffer a hematoma on the head and multiple sharp injuries to the face, chest, back, and right upper limb. They also caused victim Xu, who attempted to intervene, to sustain a sharp injury to the left shoulder. According to the assessment, the severity of victim Sun's injuries was classified as minor injuries of grade one, while victim Xu's injuries were classified as minor. On August 2, 2017, defendant Liu was apprehended by the public security authorities; on November 8 of the same year, defendant Che was apprehended. It was further found that during the trial process, victims Sun and Xu jointly filed a criminal incidental civil lawsuit with this court. Through mediation presided over by this court, defendants Liu and Che jointly compensated victims Sun and Xu a total of 85,000 yuan for all economic losses, and victims Sun and Xu expressed forgiveness towards defendants Liu and Che. Defendant Liu had no objection to the above facts during the court trial, and this is corroborated by evidence such as the case registration submitted by public security, report materials, arrest records, identification transcripts and photos, judicial evaluation reports, victim statements, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, defendant's household registration and criminal record, receipts, and letters of forgiveness.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Che": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city in Fujian Province charges: On December 27, 2015, the defendant Ou, using the alias \"Chen Moumou,\" lured the victim, Dong Mouyi, to a multi-level marketing hideout on the fifth floor of a residential building behind a department in Xipi Street, a certain district of a city, under the pretense of a romantic relationship online. Following the arrangement of the illegal multi-level marketing organization leader Liu, the defendants Zhou, Zhao, and others who had already joined the organization, unlawfully restricted the victim Dong Mouyi’s personal freedom for eight days. On the afternoon of January 4, 2016, based on a lead provided by the victim Dong Mouyi’s brother, Dong Moujia, the defendant Ou was apprehended by police in front of Aolian Bakery in a certain town of a district in the city. After being informed, the defendant Liu, along with another unidentified man, attempted to take the victim Dong Mouyi to a certain district of the city to exchange for the defendant Ou, but was captured by police. That evening, the defendants Zhou and Zhao were arrested by police at an illegal multi-level marketing hideout beside a department in Xipo Street in a certain district.", "label": {"Ou": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charged that on January 17, 2013, defendants Wang and Tang, along with Yu (already sentenced) and others, operated a casino in a bungalow at a fruit market on Nan'an Road in the Central Community of Pingdi Street, a certain district. They invited others to gather and gamble using poker cards in a game called \"San Gong,\" drawing a commission for profit. At about 2 a.m. on January 18, 2013, the police conducted a raid at the location, arresting 32 gamblers and confiscating 52,380 RMB in gambling funds, 4,500 RMB in commission, a set of poker cards used as gambling tools, and an iron bucket used for collecting commission. Additionally, it was found that defendant Wang was arrested on February 27, 2014. On March 10, 2014, defendant Tang turned himself in. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Wang and Tang during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence including the arrest process, transcripts, the criminal judgment, testimonies of witnesses Dong, Li, and Deng, confessions of defendants Wang and Tang, as well as inspection, examination, and identification records, which are sufficient to confirm the allegations.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in the early morning of April 20, 2014, the defendants Lin and Ni conspired to follow Guan to the entrance of Building 68-8 on Taige West Road, Yicheng Street, Yixing City. Using methods of choking and covering the mouth, they robbed Guan of 310 RMB. After being apprehended, defendants Lin and Ni confessed to the aforementioned facts. After the incident, defendant Lin returned 310 RMB, which has been given back to Guan. The defendants Lin and Ni raised no objection to the aforementioned facts during the trial. The facts are corroborated by the victim Guan's statement record, relevant identification records, the Yixing City Public Security Bureau's on-site inspection work record, site diagrams, photographs, inventory of seized and returned items by the Yixing City Public Security Bureau, and materials provided by investigative personnel on the criminal case investigation, which are sufficient for the determination.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ni": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the evening of June 12, 2013, defendant Wang assaulted Xiong Bing at his rented house located at No. 13 Yangjia, Zhoukang Village, BaiShaLu Subdistrict, Cixi City, because Xiong Bing did not attend Wang's son's full moon celebration. That night, defendant Wang, claiming his finger was injured by Xiong Bing and demanding medical fees, gathered defendant Jiang and others to repeatedly assault Xiong Bing at his rented house and at the rented house of his brother-in-law Li Yi and uncle Xiong Jia, resulting in injuries. According to forensic identification, Xiong Bing suffered a perforated right eardrum, leading to currently poor hearing, this injury constitutes minor injury. After defendants Wang and Jiang were captured, they both truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, the families of defendants Wang and Jiang reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim Xiong Bing, obtaining his understanding. The above facts were not contested by defendants Wang and Jiang during trial, and were corroborated by the victim Xiong Bing's statement, witnesses Liu, Li Jia, Li Yi, Xiong Jia, Wei, Xiong Yi's testimonies, identification records and photos, forensic human injury degree identification report, medical records, letter of understanding, the course of bringing to justice, the process of capturing, and identification documents of defendants Wang and Jiang, which are sufficient to establish the case. Based on the above criminal facts and circumstances, the prosecution suggests a sentencing range of imprisonment for one to two years for defendant Wang; and ten months to one year and ten months for defendant Jiang.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Nanning City charged that at about 13:00 on December 22, 2014, the defendants Wei and Nong went to the parking lot next to the gate of Guangxi Polytechnic School on a certain road in a certain district of Nanning City. They discovered that a victim named Ban had parked a Yuxuan electric scooter (valued at 2,072 RMB according to an appraisal) there, and the scooter was not securely locked. Defendant Nong kept watch while defendant Wei pushed the scooter out of the parking lot, and the two then pushed it away from the scene to steal it. On December 24, 2014, defendant Wei was apprehended by public security personnel; on January 22, 2015, defendant Nong was apprehended by public security personnel. The public security agency seized tools used for the crime from defendant Wei, including scissors, keys, a flashlight, a socket, and a flat-head screwdriver. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Nong during the court trial. These facts are corroborated by evidence such as the case acceptance registration form, the decision to file, the capture process, the decision to seize, the list of seized items and documents, the electric scooter purchase voucher, the administrative penalty decision, the compulsory rehabilitation decision, the statement of the victim Ban, the price appraisal certificate and appraisal opinion notification from the Nanning City Price Certification Center, the criminal case on-site identification record, on-site photos, identification record and photos, confessions of defendants Wei and Nong, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Nong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial ascertained that on June 11, 2014, at 14:00, defendants Geng and Li, without cause, verbally abused and assaulted victims Wei and Wu at the South-to-North Water Diversion Project office, causing multiple injuries to the victims' heads and other areas. On June 13, 2014, a forensic examination by the Neihuang County Public Security Bureau determined that the injuries sustained by victims Wei and Wu were minor. After the incident, defendants Geng and Li reached a civil mediation agreement with victims Wei and Wu, compensating them for economic losses totaling 66,000 yuan. On August 6, 2014, defendant Li surrendered to the Neihuang County Public Security Bureau. It was further found that defendant Geng had been convicted of fraud and sentenced to seven months in prison and fined 30,000 yuan on July 4, 2008. During the court proceedings, both defendants Geng and Li raised no objection to the above facts, corroborated by their confessions and defenses; statements from victims Wei and Wu; testimonies from witnesses Yang, Bu, Wang, Ni, and Li Jia; forensic conclusions from two medical injury assessment reports by the Neihuang County Public Security Bureau and injury photographs; suspect identification records and photos; details of apprehension and temporary detention by Jiangyin City Public Security Bureau; past conviction judgment for defendant Geng, proof of no previous convictions for defendant Li; surrender records and evidence; civil mediation agreement and receipt; and household registration certificates for defendants Geng and Li, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Geng": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Wuhan City charged: At approximately midnight on January 19, 2015, defendants Feng and Ding, in front of the \"Guobin Hotel\" on Gongnongbing Road in a certain district of this city, sold two packages of white crystalline powder in a plastic bag (commonly known as \"K powder\") to Zhang for 150 yuan, after which they were apprehended by the police. Upon identification, the aforementioned items were found to be ketamine, a Class I controlled psychotropic substance weighing a total of 1.89 grams. The defendants Feng and Ding raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial. The evidence, including the arrest process, case investigation process, situation explanations, case handling statements; testimony from witness Zhang; seizure list, photographs and other documentary evidence; drug testing identification report, drug storage registration form; defendants Feng and Ding's confessions and defenses; and synchronous video recording discs, sufficiently confirm the facts.", "label": {"Feng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A people's procuratorate in a certain area charged that in September 2016, the defendant Li introduced He to use another person's name and identity to register marriage with the victim Wang. Later, under the pretense of charging an introduction fee, Li defrauded Wang of 20,000 RMB, and He defrauded Wang of 60,000 RMB under the pretense of collecting a bride price. To prove the aforementioned facts, the procuratorate presented evidence such as documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the victim's statements, the defendants' confessions and defenses, and identification records in court.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that since April 2014, the defendants Wang and Cui, a married couple, have been operating a breakfast shop at No. 71 Dutou Street in a certain town within the county. During their production of steamed buns, the couple excessively added \"Osmanthus Flower Brand\" baking powder, which contains ammonium aluminum sulfate, resulting in the aluminum residue in the finished steamed buns exceeding the standard limits. Until July 23, 2014, when they were apprehended by police officers from the county's Public Security Bureau, the defendants Wang and Cui used the \"Osmanthus Flower Brand\" baking powder daily in the flour to make steamed buns that were sold to the general public for consumption. Upon testing, the steamed buns produced and sold by the defendants Wang and Cui were found to contain aluminum residues of 120mg/kg. The prosecution has provided relevant evidence for the above-mentioned facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place has filed charges, accusing that around 11 a.m. on April 20, 2015, at the construction site for a high-voltage transmission tower in a certain village of a certain town, villagers from the same village obstructed the construction by the project department of the State Grid Shanxi Transmission and Transformation Engineering Company due to unresolved land compensation issues. The defendant, Xiao, instructed workers to injure villagers Ma Moujia, Yang Mouyi, Yang Moujia, Ma Mouyi, and others, and also directed workers to smash and overturn two Wuling automobiles belonging to villagers Yang Moujia and Ma Mouyi, parked at the entrance of the construction site. During this incident, the defendants Zhu, Yuan, and Zhong participated in overturning the vehicles. According to the appraisal by the Qingxu County Pricing Certification Center, the loss for the Wuling automobiles and other damages was valued at 8,743 RMB. The Qingxu County Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center assessed that the injuries to Ma Moujia's left facial area were classified as minor injuries level two, while the head injuries of Ma Mouyi, Yang Moujia, and Yang Mouyi were classified as minor injuries. A public prosecution is now being initiated in court, requesting to hold the defendants Xiao, Zhu, Yuan, and Zhong criminally responsible for the crime of [x].", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that defendant Mai was the owner of the construction site located next to No. 56 Tangwei Road, Tangwei Community, Gongming Street, Guangming New District, a certain city. In June 2014, Mai subcontracted the project to defendant Su. On the morning of April 13, 2015, at around 8 am, a worker employed by Su, the victim Chen Zhi, while working, attempted to climb to an adjacent building using the hoist frame between two buildings from the scaffolding outside the 12th floor of the project. Defendant Yang, operating the hoist on the ground, caused the hoist's counterweight equipment to strike Chen Zhi's head, resulting in Chen Zhi falling from the building to the hoist entrance, leading to his death. After examination, it was confirmed that the victim Chen Zhi died from cranio-cerebral injuries and massive hemorrhage due to the high-altitude fall.\n\nThe Accident Investigation Team of the Guangming New District Management Committee, a certain city, determined that defendant Mai failed to handle construction reporting procedures and perform formal project subcontracting procedures for the housing project. Mai did not verify whether the project contractor possessed the relevant construction and building qualifications and illegally subcontracted the project to Su, who had no qualifications or safety production conditions, and refused to comply with the requirements in the notices issued multiple times by the planning and land supervision department to stop the illegal behavior. Defendant Su commenced construction without obtaining a \"Construction Permit,\" and undertook the construction project without acquiring the relevant building qualifications. Su also failed to establish a safety production management system and safety construction plan, did not provide workers with labor protection equipment, leading to a severe lack of safety supervision on the construction project. Defendant Yang, as the hoist operator, did not possess the qualifications related to special equipment operation workers, did not undergo special equipment operation safety education and training, and operated the special equipment without ensuring that no one was on the hoist. All three defendants are primarily responsible for this accident.\n\nOn April 19, 2015, the three defendants jointly compensated the victim's family with 320,000 RMB, receiving the understanding of the victim’s family. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Mai, Su, and Yang during the court hearing and are substantiated by relevant evidence presented in court, which is sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Mai": ["Imprisonment"], "Su": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it has been ascertained that since 2010, defendants Zhang and Sheng (a married couple) opened a deli shop selling cooked foods such as pig heads, pig ears, chicken feet, and chicken in the Shiya Shang Village market in Gushan Town of a certain city. During the preparation of cooked foods, defendants Zhang and Sheng, in order to boost sales, knowingly used \"Sunset Yellow\" which did not comply with the \"Standards for the Use of Food Additives.\" They still purchased \"Sunset Yellow\" and added it to the cooked pig heads and pig ears, selling them in their deli shop until they were apprehended on August 19, 2014. Upon appraisal, it was found that the pig heads and pig ears processed and sold by defendants Zhang and Sheng contained excessive amounts of \"Sunset Yellow,\" rendering them non-compliant products. Investigation revealed that from 2010 until their capture, the two defendants processed and sold cooked foods with added \"Sunset Yellow\" worth a total of 200,000 RMB. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Sheng during the court trial, and were further corroborated by the confessions of defendants Zhang and Sheng, testimonies from witnesses Hua, Xu, Zhou, and You, site recordings and photographs, trace notification letters and pertinent materials, seizure warrants, site records, search records, site photos, testing reports, household registration documents, and records of how they were brought to justice, all of which provide sufficient grounds for confirmation.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in June and July 2019, the defendants Zhang and Chai rented a house at No. 139, Dahu Community, Mishu Street, in a certain city, and set up mahjong tables. They organized gambling activities with several people including Yuan (who has already been administratively punished), accumulating a total profit of 17,920 RMB from rake-offs.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county (hereinafter referred to as the said county) charged that on September 16, 2015, at around 23:00, the victims Tang and Zhu encountered verbal disputes with the defendant Hong while passing through the snack street on the Second Ring Road in Songshan Town of the said county. After resolving the misunderstanding, Tang and Zhu invited Hong to have a late-night snack together. On the way, they met the victims Cao, along with Zeng, Cheng, Hu, and others. Subsequently, Zhu, Tang, Cao, Zeng, Cheng, Hu, Hong, and others went to the \"Taste of the Sea\" BBQ restaurant on the snack street. \n\nAt around 00:00 on September 17, Hong's brother arrived outside the \"Taste of the Sea\" BBQ restaurant to take home the motorcycle that Hong was riding. Hong went outside the restaurant at that time. Upon hearing the news that \"Hong is causing trouble with others inside,\" the defendant Qu, along with Ren, Lu, and Zhou (all handled in separate cases), rushed to the entrance of the \"Taste of the Sea\" BBQ restaurant. Following this, defendant Qu and others got into a verbal dispute with victims Zhu and Cao. During the altercation, victims Zhu and Cao, fearing an incident, revealed their identities, hoping to avoid trouble. However, defendants Hong, Qu, Zhou, Lu, Ren, Hong's brother, and Yang (handled in a separate case) ignored this and started assaulting victims Zhu, Cao, Tang, and others, causing injuries, and then fled the scene. According to the assessment, the injuries sustained by victims Cao, Tang, and Zhu on that day were classified as minor injuries. \n\nTo substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victims, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert assessments, on-site inspection records, and photographs as evidence.", "label": {"Hong": ["Imprisonment"], "Qu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the afternoon of March 7, 2015, defendants Shi and Zhu went to the Er Yuan Supermarket at Guandi Temple, Danghu Street, Pinghu City. Defendant Zhu kept watch outside the store while defendant Shi took advantage of the victim, Tian, purchasing goods to steal a white BBK X3L mobile phone placed in Tian's handbag, valued at 1041 yuan. It was further found that the public security authorities seized a white BBK X3L mobile phone from defendant Shi, which has been returned to the victim Tian. On March 16, 2015, defendant Zhu turned himself in at the Danghu Police Station of the Pinghu City Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed his crime. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Shi and Zhu during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the case registration form, the victim's statement, identification records, evidence receipt list, return receipt, video footage, price appraisal report, arrest report, incident report, prior criminal judgment, identification documents, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Shi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 3 p.m. on January 11, 2019, the defendants Ma, together with defendants Meng and Zhang, drove a gray Wuling Zhiguang van to a house in a certain village in Tuofeng Township belonging to a person named Lu and stole a Hisense 45-inch LCD television and a TV receiver. The stolen goods have since been returned to the victim, Lu. According to the evaluation by the Hunyuan County Price Certification Center, the value of the stolen television was 2,800 yuan, and the TV receiver was valued at 35 yuan, totaling 2,835 yuan. Furthermore, it was found that defendant Zhang surrendered to the Hunyuan County Public Security Bureau on February 20, 2019. Defendant Ma was listed as a wanted fugitive due to suspicion of a crime. On July 9, 2019, police officers from the Xifangcheng Police Station of the Hunyuan County Public Security Bureau obtained information that Ma expressed willingness to surrender. After further negotiations, it was established that Ma was willing to surrender in a certain city in a certain province. On July 10, police officers arrived in the city and contacted Ma by phone. Ma voluntarily met with the officers and was escorted back to the Hunyuan County Public Security Bureau.\n\nThese facts were uncontested by the defendants Meng, Zhang, and Ma during the court proceedings. The facts are corroborated by evidence such as the incident registration form, confessions from the three defendants, the victim Lu's report and statements, witness Mu's testimony and identification records, lists of seized and returned items, the price determination decisions from the Hunyuan County Price Certification Center, site investigation records, detailed control information on drug users, site maps and photos, photos identifying the crime scene, criminal judgment from the Xiaodian District People's Court, criminal judgment from the Hunyuan County People's Court, site inspection report, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates, case processing details, investigation summary, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial and investigation, it was found that: at around 11 p.m. on the night of November 15, 2018, defendants Shi, Mou, and Gao, after drinking, tried to show off and act aggressively. Near the southwest side of Evergrande Apartments in a certain town of a certain city, they used the excuse that the license plate number Su A××××× of the victim Shi Yi's parked small car was obstructing their way, to first punch and kick the victim Shi Yi inside and next to the car. The victim Shi Yi later ran into the “Gouhao Supermarket” operated by his family. Defendants Gao, Shi, and Mou, holding a mop, closely pursued him into the supermarket intending to continue the assault. They engaged in a fight with victim Shi Yi, who was holding a kitchen knife, at the corner of the shelves, resulting in injuries to the victim Shi Yi's hand, defendant Shi's head and face, and defendant Mou's face and hand. Afterwards, defendants Shi and Gao argued and shoved victim Shi Yi's father, Shi Bing, over the issue of reviewing surveillance footage. They punched and kicked victim Shi Bing in the supermarket and at a community entrance in a certain area. According to the certificate issued by the physical evidence appraisal room of a certain city's public security bureau, victim Shi Yi's injuries were classified as minor injuries level two, victim Shi Bing's injuries were classified as minor injuries, defendant Shi's injuries were classified as minor injuries level two, and defendant Mou's injuries were classified as minor injuries level one. After the incident, defendant Shi voluntarily surrendered, and defendants Mou and Gao were apprehended by the police. All three defendants truthfully confessed their crimes and those of their accomplices after being brought to justice. During the trial process, defendants Shi, Mou, Gao, and their respective defense attorneys raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. These facts are supported by the confessions and defenses of the three defendants, statements from victims Shi Yi and Shi Bing, testimonies from witnesses Xie, Shi Jia, and Chen, documentary evidence of basic population information forms, police response work registration forms, arrest records, criminal judgment documents, appraisal certificate from the physical evidence appraisal room of a certain city’s public security bureau, identification records, and related photographs, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Mou": ["Imprisonment"], "Gao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the evening of August 4, 2014, the defendants Peng and Tang, together with \"Xiaopang,\" \"Xiaogui,\" and \"Aizi\" (all handled in separate cases), went to the entrance of Mindar Internet Cafe in a certain village of a certain town in a certain city, where they used methods such as pushing and hot-wiring to steal an electric bicycle worth 1,760 RMB parked there by the victim Luo. On the evening of the 5th of the same month, the defendants Peng and Tang again, along with \"Xiaopang,\" \"Xiaogui,\" and \"Aizi,\" went to the entrance of Xingyuan Internet Cafe in Linhai Village of a certain town in a certain city, using the same methods to steal an electric bicycle worth 2,970 RMB parked there by the victim Wang. On August 11, 2014, the defendants Peng and Tang were apprehended by police officers from the municipal public security bureau. The defendants Peng and Tang raised no objections to the above facts during the court trial, and the facts are corroborated by documentary evidence such as sales registration slips, sales receipts, certificates of conformity, explanatory notes, administrative punishment decision, revocation of public security administrative punishment decision, population information, \"arrest process\" document, statements from the victims Luo and Wang, price appraisal opinions, recognition records, and photographs, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Peng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on May 12, 2014, at around 1 PM, the defendant, Cui, unable to endure the harassment from the victim, Chen, towards his wife, Xie, along with the defendant, Liu, assaulted the victim, Chen, in front of Building No. 22 at Hechang International City Community, Zhejiang Road, Maojian District, Shiyan City. This resulted in the victim, Chen, suffering a spleen contusion and a subcapsular hematoma. According to the appraisal by the Shiyan City Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center, the extent of physical injury to the victim, Chen, was classified as minor injury level one. After the incident, the defendants, Cui and Liu, turned themselves in to the public security authorities on May 15, 2014. It was further found that the defendants, Cui and Liu, and the victim, Chen, voluntarily reached a mediation agreement. The defendants, Cui and Liu, agreed to compensate the victim, Chen, with a one-time payment for all economic losses, totaling 40,000 yuan. The victim, Chen, waived other civil claims and expressed understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants, Cui and Liu, during the court hearing, and were substantiated by documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, defendant confessions, the Human Injury Degree Appraisal (Shi) Gong (Xing) Jian (Fa) Zi (2014) M0127 report, identification records, audio-visual materials, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Cui": ["Detention"], "Liu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In July and August 2015, the defendant Lu opened a casino at the rented house with the red iron gate from numbers 31 to 33, Yuxianqiao Lane, a certain town in a certain county. He hired the defendant Diao to help maintain order in the casino and arrange meals for the gamblers, and set up the \"Er Ba Gang\" for gambling inside the casino. The casino operated for about a month, with three gambling sessions held daily. The participants for each session were not fixed, ranging from as few as seven or eight people to more than twenty. The participants generally placed bets of ten or twenty yuan. The casino took a commission at a set percentage (about 3% to 5%), profiting two to three hundred yuan daily, with total profits of approximately 6,000 yuan. On September 16, 2015, the defendant Diao, upon receiving a written summons from the Huanfeng Police Station, voluntarily went to the police station to undergo investigation. On September 25, 2015, the defendant Lu voluntarily surrendered to the Huanfeng Police Station. The prosecution presented relevant evidence for the above charges, arguing that defendant Lu provided the venue and gambling tools for others to gamble, extracting commissions totaling about 6,000 yuan. Defendant Diao, knowing that others were operating a casino, assisted by maintaining order and arranging meals for the gamblers. The actions of both defendants constitute the crime of X. The defendant Diao played a minor role in the joint crime and is considered an accessory and should be held criminally responsible according to the law. The facts determined at trial were consistent with those charged by the prosecution. Defendants Lu and Diao did not object during the trial, and there was sufficient evidence to establish these facts, including: 1) a set of gambling tools; 2) written documents such as case acceptance registration forms, household registration certificates, and records of custody; 3) testimonies from witnesses Chen, Hao, Fu, Pan, Huang, Cheng, and another person named Lu; 4) identification records and photos.", "label": {"Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Diao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: In October 2014, Chiping County Jiaxin Aluminum Co., Ltd. carried out repairs on the workshop roof to the west of the gate of the former Shandong Chiping County Yinyibai Aluminum Co., Ltd. The person in charge at the site for Jiaxin Aluminum Co., Ltd., defendant Liu, subcontracted part of the task of replacing the roof’s colored steel tiles to Li. Li hired Lu and two others to work. On the afternoon of October 14, 2014, at around 3 PM, due to the need to hoist colored steel tiles, approximately 11 meters long, to a rooftop over 7 meters high for construction, defendant Liu arranged for defendant Cui, who was not qualified for hoisting operations, to carry out the work. The construction site was adjacent to a 100,000-volt high-voltage line, so defendant Cui, to prevent the north-south aligned colored steel tiles from contacting the high-voltage line, instructed Lu to place the tiles in an east-west orientation on top of the workshop. Subsequently, defendant Cui operated the crane to hoist the colored steel tiles while Lu was on the workshop roof receiving the tiles. During the third hoisting of the colored steel tiles, Lu was electrocuted and died. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Cui and Liu during the court trial, and were substantiated by evidence such as: basic information on permanent residents, the compensation agreement, receipts of compensation payment, testimonies of witnesses including Li, the site investigation records from the Chiping County Public Security Bureau, site diagrams and photos, forensic autopsy reports, as well as the statements and defenses of defendants Cui and Liu, which are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that at around 3:00 PM on May 1, 2014, the defendants Wang and Zhang, on the westbound bus line 1, as it reached a certain intersection in a certain district of a certain city, with Zhang covering, Wang took advantage of Zhou Moumou's unguarded moment to steal cash amounting to 9,900 RMB from Zhou Moumou's backpack and was caught on the spot by Zhou Moumou. After the case was solved, the stolen money was returned to the victim. To support these facts, the public prosecution authority has provided appropriate evidence and believes that the actions of the defendants Wang and Zhang both constitute the crime of x. The defendants Wang and Zhang are deaf-mute and committed an attempted crime, and according to the law, they may receive a lighter punishment. Please impose penalties in accordance with Article x, Article x, and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. The defendants Wang and Zhang do not object to this charge and both expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The defense counsel argued that the defendants Wang and Zhang, both being deaf-mute, committed an attempted crime, and according to the law, they may receive a lighter punishment; moreover, they are first-time offenders and expressed willingness to plead guilty, thus the punishment can be mitigated discretionarily. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang also argued that Zhang was an accomplice, and according to the law, can receive a lighter punishment. Upon investigation, it was found that at around 3:00 PM on May 1, 2014, defendants Wang and Zhang, on the westbound bus line 1, as it reached a certain intersection in a certain district of a certain city, with Zhang covering, Wang took advantage of Zhou Moumou's unguarded moment to steal 9,900 RMB from the victim Zhou Moumou's backpack, and was caught on the spot by the victim Zhou Moumou. The theft was unsuccessful. These facts have been corroborated with evidence provided by the public prosecution authority and confirmed through courtroom investigation and verification, including photos of the stolen money, recognition records, lists of seized and returned items, the victim Zhou Moumou's statement, the confessions of the defendants Wang and Zhang, and the account of the case-solving process, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting at the end of 2014, the defendant Chen engaged in \"Mark Six\" gambling, acting as the banker and having the defendant Xiao assist him in placing \"Mark Six\" bets. Xiao received kickbacks of 3% or 10% of the betting amount for each session. By October 2015, Xiao had assisted Chen with 117 betting sessions, with a total amount of 375,320 yuan, from which Xiao illegally profited 37,532 yuan and Chen illegally profited 22,000 yuan. After the incident, Xiao returned all illegal proceeds. Defendant Chen had no objection to the facts alleged in the indictment and expressed willingness to plead guilty. Defendant Xiao had no objection to the facts alleged in the indictment and expressed willingness to plead guilty. The facts established through the trial are consistent with those alleged by the prosecution. The above facts are substantiated by the confessions of defendants Chen and Xiao, and the testimonies of witnesses Kang, Lan, Li1, Xie, Li2, Li3, Zheng, He, Zhou, Zhang, Liao, Guo, among others, along with the identification records, search records, seizure decision documents, seizure lists, electronic evidence inspection records, accounting documents, arrest process, and demographic information.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that in November 2016, the defendant Hao obtained a modified nail gun from Bu. After test-firing, Hao discovered that the gun could not discharge properly, and subsequently took the gun to the home of the defendant E for assistance in modifying the gun. After modification, E returned the gun to Hao, who then hid the gun in his pigsty. After the incident, the gun was seized by the public security authorities. According to the appraisal, the modified gun had shooting capabilities, with a muzzle kinetic energy of 265.82 joules per square centimeter, thus qualifying as a firearm. After the incident, the defendant Hao was verbally summoned by the public security authorities, and the defendant E voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities.", "label": {"Hao": ["Imprisonment"], "E": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that: 1. At around 1 a.m. on August 27, 2013, defendants Sha and Yao drove a Wuling mini truck with license plate C××××× from a certain location to the entrance of No. xx, Town Middle Road, Jinqian Village, Ting Tian Street, in this city, and stole two rolls of stainless steel coil stored there by Zhang. The coils were appraised to be worth 4,240 RMB. 2. At around 1 a.m. on November 28, 2013, defendants Sha and Yao drove a Wuling mini truck with license plate C××××× from a certain location to the entrance of No. 84, Town Middle Road, Rongli Village, Ting Tian Street, in this city, and stole four sheets of type 304 stainless steel plate stored there by Wan. The steel plates were appraised to be worth 7,800 RMB. 3. At around 1 a.m. on December 9, 2013, defendants Sha, Yao, and Cui drove a Wuling mini truck with license plate C××××× from a certain location to the entrance opposite the Planning Construction Bureau in Ting Tian Street, in this city, and stole fifteen sheets of iron plate stored there by Ding. The iron plates were appraised to be worth over 4,000 RMB. 4. At around 1 a.m. on December 17, 2013, defendants Sha and Yao drove a Wuling mini truck with license plate C××××× from a certain location to the entrance of No. xxx, Yongqiang Road, Yongzhong Street, Longwan District, Wenzhou City, and stole eight pieces of medium carbon iron plate stored there by Zhang. The iron plates were appraised to be worth 4,016 RMB. After the incident, the iron plates were recovered and returned to Zhang. The aforementioned facts, which defendants Sha, Yao, and Cui did not dispute during the court hearing, are sufficiently substantiated by the statements of the victims Zhang, Wan, Ding, and Zhang, the testimony of witness Chen, the special VAT invoices, purchase receipts, price appraisal reports, arrest reports, identification records, seizure and return lists, explanatory notes, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates, and other evidence.", "label": {"Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: At about 23:00 on June 21, 2014, the defendants Tan and Chen had a dispute over trivial matters with Tan Moumou and Yang Moumou at the \"Mofang Pure K\" KTV parking lot in a village in a certain district of a certain city. The defendants Tan and Chen then assaulted Tan Moumou and Yang Moumou, causing Tan Moumou to suffer a rib fracture and multiple soft tissue injuries. It was appraised that Tan Moumou's injuries were classified as minor injury level two. On August 8, 2014, the defendant Chen turned himself in at the Xibei Police Station of the Huaxi Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city. It was also found that after the incident, the defendants Tan and Chen jointly compensated Tan Moumou and Yang A Moumou for economic losses of 66,000 yuan and 10,900 yuan, respectively, and obtained their understanding. During the trial, the defendants Tan and Chen had no objections to the above facts, which were confirmed by evidence including household registration certificates of the two defendants, the process of apprehension, appraisal opinions, identification records and photos, victim statements, witness testimonies, defendant confessions, receipts, and letters of understanding, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Tan": ["Surveillance"], "Chen": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that at about 6 p.m. on September 2, 2012, the defendant Zhu, who was engaged in the renovation of warehouse steel sheds, was in the warehouse rented by Zhang from a pharmaceutical company on Shanxing Road, Sanjiang Street, in a certain city. Due to the untimely dismantling and renovation of the steel sheds, the goods in Zhang's warehouse were soaked by rain, causing a dispute and shoving over the compensation issue, which was later mediated. When the defendant Zhu returned to the entrance of the warehouse he rented nearby and was chatting with his apprentice Wang, he saw Zhang passing by his warehouse entrance and pointing at him. The defendant Zhu then picked up a hollow square iron pipe and rushed to hit Zhang. Defendant Wang, seeing this, also picked up a threaded steel crowbar and went forward to hit Zhang, causing injuries to Zhang's calf and waist. According to the city's Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center: Zhang had a fracture in the fibular head of his left leg, and the degree of injury was minor. On September 3, 2013, defendant Zhu voluntarily surrendered to the Sanjiang Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau but did not truthfully confess the criminal facts of co-defendant Wang. On November 21, 2013, defendant Wang surrendered to the Sanjiang Police Station of the city's Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed his criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu and Wang during the trial, and were corroborated by the victim Zhang's statements, the city's Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center's forensic medical appraisal report (No. 354, 2012), identification records and photos, the list of seized items by the city's Public Security Bureau, the process of bringing to justice, situation descriptions, hospital medical records, household registration proof, the criminal judgment (No. 1385, 2004) of the People's Court of New Pudong District in the city, proof of release after serving the sentence, and other evidence, sufficient to conclude. Regarding the civil litigation attached to this case, a settlement was reached through mediation hosted by this court, where defendants Zhu and Wang compensated the victim Zhang for economic losses in the amount of 70,000 RMB, which has been fully paid. The victim Zhang requested in writing that the court leniently punish defendants Zhu and Wang.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it was found that at the beginning of 2013, defendant Wei, knowing that the \"Sildenafil Citrate Tablets\" (Viagra) offered to him by a man were counterfeit, still purchased the drugs from him at a price of 5 yuan per box. He then sold 40 boxes of it to defendant Zhou through \"Fengsu Logistics\" at a price of 8 yuan per box. Defendant Zhou, being aware that the \"Sildenafil Citrate Tablets\" he purchased from defendant Wei were counterfeit, still placed the counterfeit drugs for sale at a family planning products store he operated on Sports Lane, Fengcheng Town, a certain county, for profit. These facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Zhou during the court hearing. They were substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Xu and Li, among others, a drug verification response letter from Pfizer Inc., sample identification reports, on-site inspection records and a list of seized items forwarded by the Food and Drug Administration of a certain county, case initiation and investigation reports from the Public Security Bureau of a certain county, as well as records of seizure and return of items, identification records, search records, and household registration certificates of defendants Wei and Zhou, which are all sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that defendants Huang and Xia, on August 1, 2019, around 4:00 PM, collected 6,505 RMB from a resident of Building 20, Jiankang Road, Beipiao City, named Yu, under the pretense of assisting with fake transactions on Taobao. After completing fake transactions amounting to 2,602 RMB for Yu, they blacklisted Yu on WeChat and kept the remaining 3,903 RMB for themselves. Defendants Huang and Xia were apprehended by the police on September 11 and 10, 2019, respectively. To substantiate the aforementioned charges, the prosecution presented and read out in court evidence including the victim Yu's statement, testimony of the witness Song, confessions of the defendants Huang and Xia, identification records, audiovisual materials, and documentary evidence.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: From January 31 to February 4, 2014, the defendants Wang, Yu, and Li repeatedly conspired to go to a certain village in this district, to Yixiniao Footwear Company, to steal shoe lasts stored in the fourth-floor corridor of Yixiniao Footwear Company, and sell them to a scrap recycling station in a village in this district. Defendant Wang participated in the crime 5 times, while defendants Yu and Li each participated in the crime 3 times. The specific facts of the crime are as follows: \n\nAround 7 a.m. on January 31, 2014, defendants Wang and Yu went to the above location and stole more than 10 shoe lasts, earning approximately 23 yuan illegally from selling them. At around 7 a.m. on February 1, 2014, defendants Wang and Yu went to the same location again and stole 14 shoe lasts, earning approximately 40 yuan illegally from selling them. Around 7 a.m. on February 2, 2014, defendants Wang and Li went to the above location to steal, taking more than 10 shoe lasts and earning approximately 20 yuan illegally from selling them. \n\nAround 7 a.m. on February 3, 2014, defendants Wang and Li went to the above location to steal again, taking more than 30 shoe lasts and earning approximately 50 yuan illegally from selling them. Around 7 a.m. on February 4, 2014, defendants Wang and Li went to the above location to steal again, taking 20 shoe lasts and earning approximately 30 yuan illegally from selling them. At around 7 a.m. on February 4, 2014, defendant Yu, together with Ou, went to the above location to steal and took 23 shoe lasts, earning approximately 60 yuan illegally from selling them. \n\nThe aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Wang, Yu, and Li during the court trial. They are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Ou, and Sun, the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the arrest process, identity documents, and other evidences, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: From 2013 to September 2014, the defendant Chen, either alone or in collaboration with others, engaged in multiple instances of illegal tobacco trade without obtaining a retail tobacco monopoly license. The illegal business amount totaled 111,650 yuan. Among these, on September 13, 2014, the defendant Zhang, knowing that the defendant Chen did not have a retail tobacco monopoly license, assisted Chen in transporting cigarettes, with the illegal business amounting to 70,550 yuan.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges that in 2017, defendants Zhang and Wang jointly invested in purchasing mahjong machines. They set up a chess and card room in Zhang's location in ×× County. They organized over 20 people, including Ma, Ma1, and Ma2, to gamble using mahjong machines and the \"shoving cake\" method. The illicit gains, amounting to over 8,000 yuan from the \"rake-off,\" were divided and squandered equally. The evidence supporting the public prosecution includes documentary evidence, witness testimonies, the defendants' confessions and defenses, on-site identification records, and photographs.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Fenyang City in a certain province accused that in April and May 2020, the defendant He received a phone call from a person named \"Jiang A\" from a certain place, asking the defendant He to help purchase bank cards, agreeing to pay him 600 yuan per month for each card. The defendant He then contacted the defendant Chu, instructing him to purchase bank cards (along with the associated SIM card and certain accessories) for him. Defendant Chu subsequently sold three bank cards he acquired from Zhang and others to defendant He, who paid defendant Chu 1,200 yuan via WeChat. In October of the same year, defendant He again contacted defendant Chu by phone, requesting additional bank cards, and Chu acquired another six cards from others and handed them over to defendant He. Defendant He paid defendant Chu 4,400 yuan via WeChat. Defendant He mailed one of his own bank cards and nine acquired from defendant Chu to the aforementioned \"Jiang A\". During the year 2020, defendant Chu reached out to defendant Liu through WeChat, and Liu informed Chu about purchasing bank cards. Chu then instructed Li and others to sell Liu over 20 bank cards at prices ranging from 500 to 700 yuan, making a profit of over 7,000 yuan. Defendant Jiang and defendant Liu were friends, and from late 2019 to 2020, Jiang sold Liu 11 bank cards—5 processed by himself and 6 acquired through others—making a profit of over 4,000 yuan. Defendant Liu then sold over 30 bank cards he acquired to a certain place's \"upstream source,\" among which the card with account number 62×××78 issued by China Agricultural Bank, belonging to defendant Jiang, was used by a fraud gang for transfers, with transactions exceeding 200,000 yuan. To substantiate these accusations, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and confessions and defenses from the defendants.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that:\n\n1. Between November 3 and December 3, 2013, Liu (already sentenced) and others set up a casino near a certain village and in a tomato field in a certain county, hiring defendants Chen and Ying as lookouts for the casino. Zhang, Zheng, and others were engaged in gambling using a 32-card poker format. Defendant Ying began participating around November 8, 2013. The casino took in a total of over 100,000 yuan. It was also found that Liu A, a co-offender, had returned 12,000 yuan of the illegal proceeds, and Zhou A, another co-offender, had returned 20,000 yuan. During the court proceedings, Chen's family returned 20,000 yuan and Ying's family returned 48,000 yuan of the illegal proceeds.\n\n2. Starting December 1, 2013, Lin B, Lin A, Xu, and Yang (all dealt with separately) set up a casino next to a temple in a certain village of a certain town in the county, and near a tower in another village, organizing Liu B and other gamblers to gamble using the \"Pai Gow\" format and taking a portion of the proceeds. Between December 21 and 25, Defendant Ying was hired to help as a lookout for the casino, during which time the casino took in over 10,000 yuan. During the court hearings, Chen's family returned an additional 10,000 yuan of the illegal proceeds.\n\nThe above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Ying during the court hearing. Their earlier confessions, along with confessions from co-offenders Liu B, Liu A, Zhou B, Luo, Lin B, Lin A, and Xu, inspection records, identification records, household registration information, the arrest process, criminal judgment documents, and receipts provide sufficient evidence for confirmation.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ying": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain district people's procuratorate in a certain city charges that from early October 2013 to January 8, 2014, Ying Moumou, in collusion with Luo Moumou, Liu A (both already sentenced), and others, illegally set up an electroplating processing factory in a certain village, town, district, city without approval, employing Liu B (already sentenced) and defendants Liu and Qiao to engage in illegal electroplating production. Defendants Liu and Qiao were responsible for the specific electroplating processes at the factory and discharged untreated wastewater directly into nearby fields and ditches. Testing revealed that the concentrations of total chromium in the wastewater at the factory's discharge point, acid tank, and external drainage ditch were 12.3 mg/l, 20.4 mg/l, and 12.6 mg/l respectively; while the concentrations of total zinc were 72.4 mg/l, 947 mg/l, and 66.5 mg/l respectively; all exceeding the national maximum discharge standards by more than three times. On September 16, 2014, defendant Liu was arrested by public security organs. On November 6, 2014, defendant Qiao was arrested by public security organs. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu and Qiao during the court hearing, and were substantiated by the testimonies of co-defendants Luo Moumou, Ying Moumou, Liu A, and Liu B, identification records, records of the transfer of pollution source wastewater samples, site inspection plans and photos, the verification opinion of the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Environmental Protection on the monitoring report No. 002 (2014) of the Luhuan section, the monitoring report of the city's environmental monitoring station, as well as the evaluation standards and conclusions regarding the said testing report by the Lutiao Bridge branch of the city's Environmental Protection Bureau, arrest processes, temporary detention certificates, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: On the evening of June 20, 2014, around 8 PM, the defendant Yu, while using the internet at the \"Lushan Internet Cafe\" in a certain town in the city, had a dispute and scuffle with Gao, a resident of a village in this town. Feeling discontent, Yu then gathered the defendant Song to teach Gao a lesson. On the evening of June 24, 2014, around 9 PM, Song and Yu went together to the \"Lushan Internet Cafe\" and assaulted Gao, injuring Gao's nose. According to an assessment, Gao sustained a comminuted nasal fracture, classified as a minor injury of the second degree. On July 4, 2014, Song, Yu, and Gao reached a civil settlement agreement.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that on October 1, 2015, at around 12:00, the defendant Lu had a dispute with Yang and others near the Second Bridge of Qingshuzui Town in that county due to a traffic accident. Feeling aggrieved and outnumbered, defendant Lu called his friend Wang and others for help. After arriving at the scene with a knife, defendant Wang injured Yang's left hand. According to forensic identification, Yang's injuries constituted minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Lu and Wang compensated the victim, Yang, for a total of 80,000 yuan in losses and obtained Yang’s understanding and forgiveness. Defendants Lu and Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on October 13 and December 15, 2015, respectively, and truthfully confessed to their criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lu and Wang during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of arrival, the criminal reconciliation document, receipts, household registration records; testimonies of witnesses Zeng, Yang, Zhang, Li, Ding; statements from victim Yang; confessions and defenses from defendants Lu and Wang; forensic opinions; and identification records, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendants Ran and Jiang were co-renting with victims Wei and Bian at Room 1002, Unit 1, Building 17, Datong New Village, Xinqi Street, a district in a certain city. On the afternoon of April 16, 2015, defendants Ran and Jiang pried open the door to enter the temporary residence of victims Wei and Bian, stealing a Lenovo laptop (valued at 1,760 RMB) and an ASUS laptop (valued at 4,428 RMB). After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims, and the two defendants obtained the victims’ forgiveness. The above facts, to which defendants Ran and Jiang raised no objections during the court hearing, are substantiated by the statements of victims Wei and Bian, the price appraisal report issued by the price certification center of the district, on-site inspection records and photographs, identification records and photographs, police statements of the arrest process, letters of forgiveness, identity information, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ran": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region accused that the defendant Zhang is one of the actual operators of Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd. In May 2019, Zhang arranged for workers to clean the waste oil sludge in the company's oil tanks and bagged the sludge for storage at the company. In order to avoid inspection by the ecological environment department, Zhang contacted the defendant Wang to take the company's waste oil sludge away for dumping. Wang arranged for the defendant Zhao to drive a red front-end dump truck with a license plate of a certain region J××××× (a fake license plate). On July 4, 2019, from about 5 p.m. to 10 p.m., Zhao transported a total of 16.54 tons of the aforementioned waste oil sludge out of the factory in three trips and illegally dumped it into an earth pit without any anti-leakage measures, approximately 500 meters east of the Tianhe Used Vehicle Trading Market in the same city, causing environmental pollution. According to the appraisal by the Cangzhou Science and Technology Affairs Judicial Appraisal Center, the substances dumped by Zhang and others east of the Tianhe Used Vehicle Trading Market were identified as hazardous waste, possessing toxicity and flammability. To substantiate the aforementioned accusation, the prosecution read out and presented at the court the confessions of defendants Zhang, Wang, and Zhao; testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Tian, and Cui Xin; documentary evidence including the contract for hazardous waste harmless disposal projects signed by Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd. and Huanghua Xinzhi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., and the \"Emergency Treatment Soil Pollution Condition Investigation Report and Attachments of Huanghua Runlong Petroleum Products Co., Ltd.\" provided by Hebei Huakan Zihuan Surveying Co., Ltd.; on-site inspection records, site diagrams, and related photos, identification records, judicial appraisal engagement letter and appraisal opinions; surveillance videos, and other evidence.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hulunbuir City charged that at about 22:00 on June 29, 2014, in front of a barbecue restaurant in a certain district, the defendant Jiao engaged in a dispute with the victim Ma over trivial matters and they started fighting. The co-defendant Xu assisted Jiao in beating Ma, resulting in the victim sustaining an injury to the left shoulder. On July 14, 2014, a forensic examination by the Public Security Bureau of the district determined Ma's left shoulder injury as a minor injury category II. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Jiao and Xu during the trial, and were sufficiently corroborated by evidence including the case registration form, the process of the case, the forensic appraisal certificate for human bodily injury severity, the transcript of the interview with the victim Ma, testimonies of witnesses Bao and Liu, basic information on permanent residents, the criminal reconciliation agreement, the letter of understanding, two interrogation CDs of Jiao and Xu, and the confessions of the defendants Jiao and Xu.", "label": {"Jiao": ["Surveillance"], "Xu": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 4 a.m. on July 5, 2014, the defendants Ma and Yuan went to a certain town's Surpass Internet Cafe in a certain city. While the victim, Chen Yi, was asleep, defendant Yuan kept watch, and defendant Ma stole a black Oppo phone worth 2,100 yuan from the victim's pants pocket. After the crime, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. On July 7, 2014, defendant Yuan assisted the public security organs in apprehending defendant Ma. To prove the above charges, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including the confessions and defenses of defendants Ma and Yuan, the statement of the victim Chen Yi, the testimony of witness Chen Jia, the seizure decision, the seizure list and photos, the return list, the identification records and photos, the notification and list of evidence extraction, surveillance videos, the arrest process, basic information on permanent residents, and the price appraisal conclusion. It is believed that defendants Ma and Yuan committed the crime of theft of others’ property with the intent of illegal possession and should be held accountable for the crime of x, which constitutes joint crime. Defendant Yuan showed meritorious performance and may be given a mitigated punishment according to the law. The court is requested to punish defendants Ma and Yuan separately according to the provisions of Articles x, x, and x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Ma and Yuan have no objections to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After trial and evidence verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was found to be true. This court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged by the prosecution against defendants Ma and Yuan.", "label": {"Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Guizhou Province charges: On June 11, 2014, at around 10 a.m., the defendant Zhou and the victims, Xing and his son Xing, had a conflict regarding the transportation of sand and gravel at a construction site on the extension section of the educational city in Sajin Village, a certain city. Xing threw a stone and injured a worker, Wang, at the site. Subsequently, defendant Zhou, along with defendant Wang, gathered several workers from the construction site intending to teach Xing a lesson, but to no avail. Later, they had a verbal dispute with Xing. During the dispute, Zhou, Wang, and the workers present physically assaulted Xing, causing injuries to his right elbow, both lower limbs, and waist. According to the assessment, the injuries to Xing's right elbow and lower limbs were classified as minor injuries, while the injury causing transverse fractures to the first and second lumbar vertebrae on the left was classified as a secondary minor injury. After the incident, defendants Zhou and Wang and others compensated the victim Xing with 33,955 yuan for medical and other expenses and received Xing's understanding. The above charges were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Wang during the trial process. The evidence includes: the arrest report from the local police station of a certain Public Security Bureau, household registration certificates of defendants Zhou and Wang, the mediation agreement, the letter of understanding; testimonies from witnesses Xing, He, Li, Yang, Xing, Xia, Wang, Wang A, Wang B, and Tao; the victim Xing's statement; the forensic identification report (2014) No. 247; the notice of identification opinion; the on-site identification record and photos of the criminal case; the confessions of defendants Zhou and Wang, among others, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in the early morning of January 17, 2014, in the eastern open area of Chandu Heat Treatment Plant, Chengxi Industrial Park, Shangcun, Hutang Town, Wujin District, a certain city, Defendant Xu took advantage of his position at Jiangsu Chang Dafeng Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., where he was assigned to watch over the company’s construction cables at night. He colluded with Defendant Zhang and Niu (who is being handled in a separate case), using hydraulic pliers and other means to steal 24 meters of Baoan brand YJV22-8.7/10KV-3*400 type cable belonging to the company, valued at 14,952 RMB. After the incident, Defendant Zhang and Niu returned the proceeds from the stolen goods, which were then returned to the victimized company. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Defendants Xu and Zhang during the trial, and they were corroborated by the testimony record of the victimized company's witness, Yu, the testimony records of other witnesses such as Niu and Song, documentary evidence such as the labor contract and payroll provided by the victimized company, the incident and capture process, identification records, and photos produced by Wujin District Public Security Bureau of a certain city, as well as the price authentication conclusion of the items involved from the Price Certification Center of Wujin District, a certain city.", "label": {"Xu": ["Detention"], "Zhang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that on July 24, 2018, at approximately 5 p.m., the defendants Xia and Jiang went to a certain district in a certain city to demand a debt from the victim Li. Subsequently, Xia, Jiang, and others drove a white SUV with the license plate number Yun D×××××, taking Li to an abandoned mining site near the Songmao Reservoir in the district to demand the debt, and unlawfully restricted his personal freedom for about 3 hours. During this process, Xia and Jiang assaulted Li, and Xia used a knife to intimidate and threaten Li.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that at around 16:00 on March 20, 2020, a certain company was conducting production operations inside coal shed No. 6 in the coal storage area of the Tumed Right Banner Coal Industry Park. Defendant Wang was operating a loader to push the unloaded coal onto a large coal pile. While reversing, the front right wheel of the loader knocked down and ran over Yang, a coal unloading worker employed by defendant Ma, resulting in Yang's death. After the incident, defendant Ma reported it to the police. According to the forensic examination, the victim Yang died from traumatic hemorrhagic shock caused by the compression of the chest and abdomen by a large blunt object. On March 22, 2020, Inner Mongolia Xindeli Fuel Co., Ltd. reached a compensation agreement with the victim Yang's family and obtained the family's forgiveness. On August 9 and 11, 2020, defendants Ma and Wang respectively surrendered to the authorities. The People's Procuratorate of a certain place submitted the following evidence materials to this court to charge defendants Ma and Wang with the crime of X: 1. Labor contracts, safety management agreements, power of attorney, business licenses, compensation agreements, letters of forgiveness, training materials, power of attorney, explanations of arrest circumstances, household registration information, etc.; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Li, Jin, Bai, Yan, Li, Li, He, and Yang; 3. Confessions and defenses of defendants Ma and Wa", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain place accused the defendants Luo and Jiang of arranging to use methamphetamine together through WeChat with Xiao Ling (phonetic). On December 25, 2014, Luo purchased a small amount of methamphetamine crystals and tablets. Subsequently, Luo discussed with the defendant Jiang about using drugs together, agreeing that Jiang would be responsible for the room fee. Around 6 PM on that day, Luo and Jiang came to Liyuan Hotel with the methamphetamine. Luo and Jiang registered room 428 under Luo's name, and Jiang paid 200 yuan on the spot for the room fee and deposit. At about 9 PM, Lu (phonetic) arrived at the room with friends Lin (phonetic) and Tiha (phonetic). Subsequently, the defendants Luo and Jiang, together with Lu and the other three, consumed methamphetamine crystals. Around 10 PM, the public security organ apprehended Luo, Jiang, and the other five people in the hotel room on the spot and seized the unfinished drugs and drug-taking tools. The urine samples of Luo, Jiang, Lu, and the other five were tested with methamphetamine test reagents, resulting in positive results for all five. The defendants Luo and Jiang did not object to the above facts during the trial, which are corroborated by the following evidence: 1. Information on permanent residents, statement of arrest situation, detailed phone call logs, list of seized items, guest accommodation registration form from Liyuan Hotel; 2. Testimonies from witnesses Lu, Lin (phonetic), Tiha (phonetic), and Yu; 3. On-site inspection record; 4. Identification record and photos; 5. Audiovisual materials; 6. On-site testing report from Yugan County Public Security Bureau. All the evidence was subjected to cross-examination during the trial, and defendants Luo and Jiang did not object. The sources of evidence are legitimate, objective, truthful, and form an evidence chain sufficient to establish the criminal facts charged by the prosecution that Luo and Jiang allowed others to use drugs.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Gulou District in a certain city charges that, between September 2017 and July 2018, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in order to seek illegal benefits, jointly used WeChat and QQ to impersonate staff members of \"Nanjing XuanYing Network Technology Co., Ltd.\" They falsely claimed that they could assist in registering micro-businesses and provide goods for sale on registered malls, thereby defrauding unspecified individuals of a total of 14,380 RMB. The specific facts are as follows: 1. In November 2017, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in pursuit of illegal benefits, defrauded the victim Rong of 4,500 RMB over the internet by claiming to boost orders for Rong’s micro-store. 2. In May 2018, the defendants Zhang and Gong, in pursuit of illegal benefits, defrauded Liu of 9,880 RMB by claiming to provide goods for sale on a registered mall located in a certain city. On September 13, 2018, both defendants were apprehended by the public security organs, and after arriving at the case, they truthfully confessed the above facts. After the incident, the families of the defendants Zhang and Gong have compensated the victims for all economic losses, receiving their understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Gong during the trial and are substantiated by documentary evidence, including the basic information of the permanent population for defendants Zhang and Gong, case registration form, decision to file a case, case-solving procedures, details of their arrival at the case, seizure decision, business license, micro-store page, logistics information, Alipay, WeChat ID, QQ ID, transaction records, chat records, situation explanation, receipts, the letter of understanding, statements from victims Liu and Rong, confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhang and Gong, as well as on-site inspection records, examination records, identification records, and investigation experiment records, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area accuses: On April 6, 2015, at around 22:00, the defendant Cao was playing mahjong in the mahjong room operated by his mother, Xiao, at No. 25, Door 1, Street 104, Metallurgy Street, Qingshan District, Wuhan City. He saw the victim Xiong, in an argument with others at another table and accused Xiong of causing trouble in his family's mahjong parlor, leading to a dispute. The defendants Cao and Wang used glass cups, stools, and other tools to injure Xiong before leaving the scene. Subsequently, defendant Cao instructed Wang to continue gathering people to seek revenge against Xiong. Defendant Wang invited defendants Zhang and Jiang and others to drive to the Wuhan Steel General Hospital. In the hospital's emergency room, they found Xiong's companion Yu, and used sticks to assault the victim Yu, causing severe disruption to the emergency room's order. According to the assessment, Xiong's injuries were classified as minor injuries of the second degree, while Yu's injuries were classified as mild injuries. After the incident, defendants Cao, Wang, Zhang, and Jiang actively compensated the victims Xiong and Yu for their economic losses, totaling 120,000 RMB, and obtained the understanding of the victims. The defendants Cao, Wang, Zhang, and Jiang had no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial process, and the evidence such as the case investigation and arrest process by the public security agency, identity materials and criminal records, statements from the victims Xiong and Yu, testimonies from witnesses Qiu, Sun, and Xiao, and expert opinions are sufficient to confirm the facts. Regarding the defense opinion of defendant Cao's defense counsel that \"the victim is at fault in this case,\" after investigation, it was found that defendant Cao, due to trivial matters, along with defendant Wang, randomly assaulted others and instructed defendant Wang to gather people to cause trouble in public places. The victim in this case had no fault, and the defense opinion is inconsistent with the established facts. Therefore, this point of opinion is not supported by the court.", "label": {"Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. At around 3 a.m. one day in early October 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun carried tools to a villa under renovation by Jiang next to the Longtouling Land Bureau in a certain county, stealing electrical wires and two copper pipes from the air conditioning unit. 2. Between 3 and 4 a.m. on October 25, 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun went to the stationery store operated by Shi opposite the kindergarten in the Wutongshu Residential Community in a certain county. Defendant Liang pried open the anti-theft net, while defendant Sun acted as a lookout. Defendant Liang entered the store and stole a white VIVO phone, a \"Tianwang\" brand watch, a digital camera, and over 200 yuan in cash. According to the appraisal, the stolen phone was valued at 525 yuan, and the watch at 577 yuan. 3. One night at the end of October 2015, the defendants Liang and Sun carried tools to a villa under renovation by Wu next to the Longtouling Land Bureau in a certain county, stealing electrical wires. 4. At around 9 p.m. one night in June 2015, defendant Liang went to Liu's machinery factory at the former Duxiu Cement Plant in a certain county, stealing more than thirty meters of copper core cable. 5. At around 8 p.m. one night in November 2014, defendant Liang went to Wutongshu Hospital in Longtouling, a certain county, stealing two copper pipes from the hospital's hyperbaric oxygen chamber.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. In the early morning of September 5, 2015, the defendant Xiao went to the entrance of Jie Net Internet Cafe in Baijia Town, Henghe Street, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a red unlicensed women's scooter parked there by the victim, Yang. 2. In the early morning of September 6, 2015, the defendant Xiao went to the entrance of Vigor Internet Cafe in Baijia Town, Henghe Street, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a black women's motorcycle with the license plate Yue RNS4** parked there by the victim, Chen. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 3,313 yuan. 3. In the early morning of October 2, 2015, the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen went to the area below Hengfu Residence, Xiaoshi, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a blue men's motorcycle with the license plate Yue RGG2** parked there by the victim, Huang. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 2,048 yuan. After the case was solved, the public security authorities recovered the stolen motorcycles and returned them to the victims. 4. One day in September 2015, in the early morning, the defendant Li went to the area below Bichui Garden, Zone 7, Xiaoshi, Qingcheng District, a certain city, and stole a red men's knife-style motorcycle with the license plate Yue RD45** parked there by the victim, He Y. According to the appraisal, the motorcycle was valued at 1,467 yuan. The criminal facts mentioned above were not objected to by the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen during the trial, and they were confirmed by the statements of the victims Yang, Chen, Huang, and He Y, the confessions and defenses of the defendants Xiao, Li, and Wen, testimony from witnesses such as He A and Kong Mouyun, physical evidence, documentary evidence, appraisal opinions, records of inspection, examination, and identification, household registration information, details of the arrests, audio and video materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to make a determination. The defendant Wen argued that the public security authorities used coercive interrogation on the day I was captured at the police station.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 3:00 am on June 12, 2014, the defendants Wang and Su, along with \"A\" and \"Xiao\" (handled in a separate case), were driving past the \"Bailian\" supermarket in a certain town of a certain county, where they had a dispute with Yang, who was passing by with a kitchen knife. The defendants Wang and Su, along with others, got out of the car and took the kitchen knife from Yang's hand, then punched and kicked Yang, causing him to fall to the ground. The defendants Wang and Su, along with others, continued to beat him by kicking, dragging by his legs, and other means, resulting in injuries to Yang. According to the forensic examination, Yang sustained localized soft tissue contusions to the head, localized soft tissue contusions to the torso accompanied by a linear fracture of the right 5th anterior rib, and right 9th to 12th posterior ribs, and a fracture of the left transverse process of L1. The overall assessment of his injuries was minor injury grade two. After the incident, the defendant Wang advised the defendant Su to surrender, and they both turned themselves in at the public security bureau of a certain county on August 6, 2014. During the trial in this court, the parties reached a settlement agreement. The relatives of the defendants Wang and Su compensated the victim Yang for his economic losses in the amount of 30,000 RMB, and Yang expressed his understanding of the defendants Wang and Su's criminal acts. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Wang and Su during the trial and were substantiated by statements from the victim Yang, a forensic medical assessment of the degree of bodily injury, video footage from the scene, prior records, a mediation agreement, a letter of understanding, population information, and records of the apprehension, all of which are sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Su": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that in January 2016, the defendant Gu, in order to settle project payments from Zhenjiang Water Conservancy Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Water Conservancy Construction Company), without actual business dealings, had 41 ordinary VAT invoices of a certain province falsely issued for himself through Wang Jia and Wang Yi (both handled in separate cases), with a total face value of 4.0016 million yuan, which he later provided to the Water Conservancy Construction Company to settle project payments. In January 2016, the defendant Gu, to settle project payments from the Water Conservancy Construction Company, without actual business dealings, had the defendant Luo contact others to falsely issue material cost invoices for him. Later, Luo, through the defendant Chen, falsely issued five ordinary VAT invoices of a certain province for Gu, with a total face value of 2.5 million yuan, which the defendant Gu provided to the Water Conservancy Construction Company for settling project payments. After the case came to light, the defendants Gu, Luo, and Chen voluntarily reported to the public security authorities upon notification and truthfully confessed all the aforementioned criminal facts. Accordingly,", "label": {"Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the afternoon of August 22, 2014, the defendants Shen and Shi, after premeditation, had Shen rent a Toyota Reiz car with the license plate Zhejiang B××××× from Cixi Jiafu Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. Subsequently, the two defendants had someone create a driving license and registration certificate falsely bearing the name Chen. On the evening of the 27th of the same month, around 7 o'clock, Shen and Shi, introduced by Pan at a hair salon near Huan Chi Community, Gutang Street, Cixi, used the forged documents to impersonate Chen and mortgaged the vehicle to Hu, fraudulently obtaining 70,500 RMB. On the 29th of the same month, Cixi Jiafu Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. discovered the vehicle missing, retrieved it after a search, and drove it away. Hu was unable to contact Shen and Shi. After their arrest, Shen and Shi truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. After the incident, Shen and Shi compensated the victim for economic losses amounting to 80,000 RMB and obtained the victim's understanding. Shen and Shi raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial and the prosecution’s claims were corroborated by Hu's victim statement, the testimonies of witnesses Pan, Ji, and Xu, identification records and photos, call detail records, inventories of seized items, rental contracts, copies of forged documents, electronic bank real-time transfer receipts, vehicle sale agreements, receipts, criminal understanding documents, records of the case's procedural handling, and identifications of the defendants Shen and Shi, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the charge.", "label": {"Shen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: From July 2011 to May 2012, a certain county's urban area expanded southward, requisitioning part of the land in a certain village of a certain town and paying compensation for the attached objects on the land. In the first half of 2013, the defendants Liu and Song, without approval, unlawfully dug ponds for fish farming and planted saplings in the aforementioned requisitioned land at the location of a certain villa area. In May 2016, victims Li and Wang partnered to undertake the earthwork leveling project of the villa area and subsequently entered the site for construction. On May 23 of the same year, the county's Land and Resources Bureau sent a letter to Liu, requiring him to rectify the unauthorized occupation of construction land and clear aquatic products and other equipment from the fish pond within seven days from the date of the letter. Liu and Song did not rectify the situation within the deadline. On June 5, 2016, Liu and Song went to the construction site, demanded the machinery to stop working, and sought compensation related to the fish pond. On June 10, 2016, Liu returned to the construction site and again obstructed the work, claiming that compensation for the fish pond was yet to be paid. After Li called the police, officers took Liu to a certain police station, where Liu issued a written guarantee before leaving. Shortly thereafter, Liu contacted Wang requesting compensation for the fish pond and related facilities. Worried about Liu and others continuing to obstruct the construction, Wang was forced to agree to compensate him with 25,000 yuan, with 10,000 yuan paid on the same day. When the earthwork project was nearing completion, Li paid Liu the remaining 15,000 yuan. Liu and Song received 15,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan, respectively. In July 2019, Liu and Song were brought to justice after being notified by the police via phone. After the incident, Liu obtained forgiveness from victim Li. To support the charges, the prosecution provided documentary evidence such as the case registration form, the decision to file the case, the transaction confirmation for state-owned construction land use rights, receipts, a letter notification, record of the case intake process, population information forms; testimonies from witnesses Wang, Han, Zhu, and Jiao; statements from victims Li and Wang, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Song.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Song": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that at around 1:00 am on September 19, 2013, the defendants Qin and Guo stole a red Honda DAX Giraffe motorcycle belonging to Zhang Mou Yi in front of the Xin Bai Wang supermarket in Beixinzhuang Village, Nanshi District, a certain city. The motorcycle was valued at 3,672 RMB. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Qin and Guo during the trial, and were corroborated by the case report, Price Appraisal Conclusion No. (2013) 069 by the Southern Price Appraisal, the victim Zhang Mou Yi's statement, witness Zhang Mou Yi's testimony, the list of seized and returned items and the photographs of the stolen motorcycle, the list of evidence obtained from surveillance footage, identification transcripts and photos, Criminal Judgment No. (2007) Nan Xing Chu Zi 299 and release certificate stub, Criminal Judgment No. (1996) Qing Xing Chu Zi 59, and the household registration certificates of the defendants Qin and Guo, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qin": ["Imprisonment"], "Guo": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the Third District of a Certain City charges that on December 11, 2013, at about 2:00 PM, the defendants Liang and Wang went to Good Luck Lodge at No. 15-11 Baoshi Road, Jiaoyitang Community, Tangxia Town, in a certain city to commit burglary. Liang used a wrench and a homemade key to pry open the door of Room 502 on the fifth floor of the building, and then Liang and Wang stole a Coolpad model 7020 mobile phone (worth 208 yuan) belonging to the victim Yang inside the room. Subsequently, Liang and Wang went to the second floor of the building, where Wang acted as a lookout while Liang pried open the door of Room 205 and entered to steal a Hasee model A460-T35 laptop computer (worth 1035 yuan) belonging to the victim Wu. The defendants Liang and Wang were apprehended while fleeing the scene, and the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victims. The prosecution authority provided evidence including an on-site inspection record, site diagrams and photographs, physical evidence such as the Hasee laptop and Coolpad phone, documents regarding the case resolution, household registration proof, seizure list, appraisal of the value of the involved property, explanatory materials, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Zhao Jia, and Zhao Yi, statements from the victims Wu and Yang, and confessions, identifications, and recognitions recordings from the defendants Liang and Wang. Based on this, the prosecution believes that the defendants Liang and Wang have committed the crime of x. Considering their truthful confessions and the fact that the crime was not completed, it is recommended that the court sentence them to imprisonment for a term ranging from six months to one year and six months and impose a fine. The defendants Liang and Wang have no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations of the prosecution and have not presented any defense arguments. After examination, it is confirmed that the facts of the crime x charged by the prosecution against the defendants Liang and Wang are clear, and the evidence is credible and sufficient; therefore, the court acknowledges it.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in early March 2015, on a certain day, defendant Xu, through defendant Shuai, purchased a batch of \"methamphetamine\" from another person for 3,500 RMB for personal use. At approximately 0:00 on March 13, 2015, defendant Xu brought the remaining methamphetamine and, along with defendant Shuai, traveled in vehicle Yue Y××××× to Guohui Hotel in Chancheng District, a certain city. During the ride, Xu handed over 12.34 grams of methamphetamine to Shuai for safekeeping, while keeping 4.68 grams for himself. As they arrived at the Guohui Hotel parking lot, the police caught them red-handed. According to the evaluation, the seized 17.02 grams of \"methamphetamine\" all tested positive for methamphetamine composition. Defendant Xu and Shuai raised no objections to these facts during the trial, supported by witness Feng's testimony and identification records, arrest process, search record, list of seized items, explanation statement, forensic laboratory test report, household registration proof, and the confessions and identification records made by defendants Xu and Shuai during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Shuai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on March 1, 2015, and March 2, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed others to use methamphetamine twice in their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. The details are as follows: 1. On March 1, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed Zhu to use methamphetamine once in a room in their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. 2. On March 2, 2015, the defendants Chen and Lu allowed Zhu to use methamphetamine once in the living room of their home at 508 Tongyue Jiayuan, Building 17, Xinghua City. After the incident, the defendants Chen and Lu truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Lu during the trial and are substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses such as Zhu and Zhang; documentary evidence including: the permanent resident registration form and case registration form extracted by the Xinghua City Public Security Bureau, a statement of the incident, the on-site inspection report produced by the Xinghua City Public Security Bureau, inspection records, and identification records, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts. Additional evidence proving the facts of the case includes: the criminal judgment No. 474 of the (2011) Taixing Criminal Preliminary of the People’s Court of Xinghua City, Jiangsu Province, the administrative penalty decision, and release registration form.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a Certain District in Wuhan City charges: At around 9 a.m. on June 2, 2013, the defendants Wang and Liu, after premeditation, went to the vicinity of a residential area in a certain district of the city. They impersonated police officers and attempted to defraud Zhang Mouyi of 4,000 yuan on the pretext that Zhang Mouyi needed to pay a \"fine\" for soliciting prostitution. Later, when the defendants Wang and Liu accompanied the victim Zhang Mouyi to a China Construction Bank branch to withdraw money, the victim's son-in-law, Hu Moumou, discovered and saw through the scam. Defendant Wang was captured by Hu Moumou and others and handed over to the public security authorities. Defendant Liu took the opportunity to escape. Subsequently, after an investigation, the public security authorities apprehended defendant Liu and brought him to justice on June 25, 2013. The aforementioned facts are uncontested during the trial by defendants Wang and Liu and are supported by evidence including the victim Zhang Moubing's report, statements, and identification records; materials from the public security authorities regarding the arrest and case resolution process; bank withdrawal records; testimonies from witnesses Hu Mou, Huang Mou, and Zhang Moujia; the Decision on Re-education Through Labor (No. 1458 [2003]) from the Wuhan Municipal Labor Re-education Administration Committee; and the confessions and defenses of defendants Wang and Liu made to the public security authorities, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Defendant Zhu had multiple disputes with the construction unit due to issues of land ownership. On the morning of March 16, 2014, Zhu drove to the construction site and saw that the project department was working. He then called the defendant Wang and asked him to use a bulldozer to push over the steel pipe scaffolding at the site. Wang subsequently drove the bulldozer to the site and damaged the steel pipe scaffolding outside the 11th building under construction. According to the appraisal, the value of the damaged items amounted to 7,783 RMB.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Fine"], "Wang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on October 23, 2014, at around 3 PM, the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen, along with the victim Zhang, were involved in a physical altercation over a trivial matter in front of No. 63, Siqian, Lujia Village, Development Zone, in this city. During the conflict, the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen used their fists and feet, as well as a log, to beat the victim Zhang, resulting in a comminuted fracture of the distal right radius for the victim Zhang, which was classified as a minor injury level 1. After the incident, Gan and the defendants' families reached a settlement agreement with the victim Zhang, who received compensation of 194,000 RMB and expressed forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were acknowledged by the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen during the trial without objection, and were further corroborated by evidence such as the case registration form, household registration certificates, personal information, injury photographs, list of retrieved evidence, medical records, medical condition evaluation form, notification of evaluation opinions, application, settlement agreement, receipt; testimonies of witnesses Gan, Wu, and Gao; the account provided by investigators from the public security organ; victim Zhang's statement; forensic medical report No. Wu A Wu Jian (Fa) Zi (2016) 504 on the degree of human injury; a record of identification, site inspection record and crime scene photography; as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants Yang, Wang, and Shen, which are all sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Shen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that at around 18:00 on May 20, 2016, the defendant Liang, on his way to work, discovered a blue TailG electric scooter with the license plate Nanning 973** at the entrance of a restaurant named Original Taste Coconut Chicken located next to the south gate of 303 Jiangbei Avenue, Nanning. The key was not removed from the scooter, so he took the key and later gave it to the defendant Su, instructing Su to steal the scooter. Subsequently, the defendant Su stole the scooter. According to an appraisal, the stolen electric scooter was valued at 2,726 yuan at the time of the incident. Further investigation revealed that after the incident, the public security organ seized an electric scooter from the defendant Su, which has been returned to the victim, Deng. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Liang and Su during the court trial, and they did not submit any evidence to the court. The case is supported by various pieces of evidence including the case registration form, household registration certificates, arrest records, administrative penalty decisions, compulsory detoxification decisions, invoices for the stolen items, surveillance video screenshots, extraction records, seizure records, a list of seized items, a list of returned items, the testimony of witness Fu, the statement of victim Deng, the confessions of the defendants Liang and Su, price appraisal reports, identification transcripts, on-site identification transcripts, and photographs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Su": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from early April 2019 to April 25, defendant Zhao, without a tobacco retail license, purchased vaping cartridges from a Russian entering a certain city and sold 1,110 cartridges to defendant Tang and 40 cartridges to Song at a price of 165 RMB each. After the incident, 422 cartridges were seized in a garage rented by Zhao. Zhao's illegal business amount was 234,060 RMB, with an illegal profit of 1,700 RMB. From early April 2019 to April 25, defendant Tang, also without a tobacco retail license, sold 200 cartridges to Liu from Mudanjiang and, together with Yan Dong (handled in a separate case), sold 800 cartridges in a certain area, with each cartridge priced at 165 RMB. On April 25, 2019, the public security authorities arrested defendants Zhao and Tang, who were about to trade cartridges, in garage number 48 of a residential area in a certain city. 810 cartridges that Zhao intended to sell were seized on site, and 132,800 RMB that Tang intended to use to purchase cartridges was confiscated, along with 200 cartridges found in the black Magotan car Tang was driving. Tang's illegal business amount was 190,000 RMB, with an additional 133,650 RMB being attempted, and an illegal profit of 5,000 RMB. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution presented and read out in court evidence including photos of seized cartridges; documentary evidence of case origin, apprehension process, residence registration and current behavior certification, labor contract, search warrant, seizure list, cash deposit slip, inventory of property seized by a province, discharge and diagnostic medical records, evidence retrieval notice, explanation for tobacco retail administrative license handling, notice for assisting in property inquiry, China Agricultural Bank transaction slips, etc.; testimonies of witnesses Song, Yan Dong, Liu, Wang, Zhu1, Zhu2; confessions and defenses of the defendants Zhao and Tang; appraisal and inspection report from a provincial tobacco quality supervision and testing station; electronic data inspection records, search records, and identification records from a city's public security bureau cyber security brigade, and other evidence.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it has been found that on March 28, 2015, the defendant Wang leased the store at No. 287, East District of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, Siming District, in a certain city. In late May 2015, knowing that others intended to operate a casino, the defendant Wang still provided the venue to \"A Jun\" (handled in a separate case) for casino operation, with an agreed venue fee of 1,000 RMB per day. The casino provided playing cards for others to gamble in the \"San Gong\" style and profited by taking a rake-off. On May 24, 2015, the defendant Xiao was employed by the casino to act as a lookout. At around 22:00 on May 28, 2015, the police arrested defendants Wang, Xiao, and gamblers Wan, Xiang, and others at the above location. They seized a deck of playing cards used in the crime, a rake-off box, a TCOM brand walkie-talkie (black, model TK-668), illegal proceeds of 74,800 RMB in rake-offs, and 43,240 RMB in gambling funds. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang had received a total of 2,000 RMB in illegal venue fees, which was returned on January 15, 2016, by a family member to this court. The above facts were confessed by defendants Wang and Xiao after they were brought to justice and throughout the trial. In addition, witness testimonies from Long, Xiang, Wan, Tang, Zeng, and Zhong, along with the seized playing cards, rake-off box, walkie-talkie, illegal proceeds in rake-offs, gambling funds, and scene photos, identification records, extraction records, site inspection records, seizure list, seizure warrant, receipt for returned illegal proceeds, rental contract, inquiry explanation of illegal activities and criminal records, fugitive registration information, defendants’ household registration information, and the police report on the case and explanation of circumstances constitute evidence in the case sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: 1. On August 9, 2016, at about 4 PM, Liu (already sentenced) organized and gathered defendants Cao, Li, Dou, Gao, Sun, and others. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county, carrying shovels, hand saws, cement, and other items. They sawed open the gas pipeline and poured cement and inserted bricks into it, damaging the pipeline. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 9,222 yuan. 2. On August 13, 2016, at about 10 AM, Liu and Sun (both already sentenced) organized and gathered defendants Dou, Gao, and others. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain town in a certain county, carrying electric drills. They drilled holes into the company's gas pipeline, causing damage. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 43,467 yuan. 3. One night in mid-August 2016, defendant Cao conspired with Liu and Sun. They drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain district in a certain county, carrying electric drills. They drilled holes into the company's gas pipeline and poured soybeans into it, causing damage. The damaged pipeline was appraised to be worth 10,700 yuan. Later, defendant Cao, with Liu and Sun, drove to the construction site of Xin'ao Mingshun Gas Co., Ltd. in a certain village of a certain district in a certain county. They ", "label": {"Cao": ["Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"], "Dou": ["Fine"], "Gao": ["Fine"], "Sun": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: In the early morning of June 27, 2015, defendant Hou and defendant Ma were near the Binhu Mingzhu Community in a certain district of a certain city. Hou entered the community and stole victim Yao's \"Xunying\" brand electric bicycle from the entrance of Building 1, Unit 1. After riding it out of the community, he handed it over to Ma. Ma purchased the two electric bicycles, including this one, for 1,100 yuan. According to the appraisal, the bicycle was valued at 1,907 yuan. In the early morning of August 24, 2015, defendants Hou and Ma went to the vicinity of Huijie Garden, Binhu Century City, in a certain district of a certain city. Hou entered the community and stole victim Zhang's \"Royalstar\" brand electric bicycle from the hallway entrance of Building 1, Unit 2. Ma purchased the two electric bicycles, including this one, for 1,400 yuan. According to the appraisal, the bicycle was valued at 2,021 yuan. Accordingly,", "label": {"Hou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Hunan Province charges: \n\n1. At around 9 a.m. on July 16, 2014, the defendant Jiang, wearing a police uniform, impersonated a police officer at the entrance of Ai Shang · Lanshan Chinese and Western Restaurant on Tianxing Road in a certain district of a certain city. He deceived the victim, Zhang, by claiming that Zhang had to go to the police station for processing due to soliciting prostitution. This was used to trick Zhang into getting into the blue Great Wall vehicle with license plate N××××× driven by the defendant Luo. They then pretended to drive to the Xinyuan Police Station of the Hecheng Sub-bureau of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. During the journey, they defrauded 2,400 yuan in cash from the victim, Zhang, by falsely claiming it was a \"fine\" for soliciting prostitution. The defendant Jiang received 2,400 yuan as his share of the stolen money, while the defendant Luo received 1,300 yuan.\n\n2. At around 12 p.m. on July 18, 2014, the defendant Jiang, again wearing a police uniform, used the same method near the Sanjiaoping distillery in a certain district of a certain city to deceive the victim, Zheng, into getting into the blue Great Wall vehicle with license plate N××××× driven by the defendant Luo. They intended to \"fine\" 10,000 yuan from Zheng for soliciting prostitution. However, as the defendants Jiang and Luo drove to a location near the Liu Lin Group Company on Hongxing Road in a certai", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that around 2:50 AM on June 4, 2013, defendants Kuang and Liu, along with Zuo (handled in a separate case), went to Room 612 of XX Building, Spring, Southern Bonded Area, entered through an unlocked door, and while victims Li, Xiong, and He were asleep, stole an Asus laptop (valued at 2,387 RMB), an Acer laptop (valued at 2,430 RMB), and a white savings jar containing over 100 RMB. After the incident, the co-defendant Zuo compensated the victims for their losses, totaling 5,000 RMB. The defendants Kuang and Liu did not dispute these facts during the court proceedings. The facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Li, Xiong, and He, the testimony of witness Zuo, identification records and photographs, valuation reports, police statements on the course of events and escorting record, administrative penalty decisions, receipts, and residential information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Kuang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain place charged: In late June 2012, defendant Zhou, knowing it was a stolen vehicle, purchased a red Suzuki 125 two-wheeled motorcycle from someone near a certain city for 1,000 yuan. On the 30th of the same month, defendant Huang, knowing it was a stolen vehicle, purchased the motorcycle from defendant Zhou for 1,200 yuan. Investigation revealed that the vehicle was stolen from Chen, who was from a certain village in Lanshan District of a certain city, on September 27, 2011, in a bay of that city, with an appraised value of 4,400 yuan. Regarding the aforementioned facts charged, the prosecution read aloud and presented the following evidence in court: documentary evidence such as household registration information; appraisal opinions; victim Chen's statement; confessions of defendants Zhou and Huang.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a certain district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region alleged that at around 2 a.m. on March 23, 2015, the defendant Liang entrusted the defendant Zhou to help him purchase drugs for consumption at a club. Subsequently, Zhou bought a package of the drug MDMA (commonly known as \"milk tea\") from \"Ya Niu\" (a nickname, dealt with in a separate case) for 250 RMB and handed it to Liang. Liang then took the purchased MDMA to a private club in Hekou Village, Tengzhou Town, a certain county, for entertainment. At around 3 a.m. the same day, police officers from the county public security bureau conducted a raid on the club, arresting Liang and Zhou at the scene and seizing 30.3 grams of suspected MDMA. The Wuzhou Public Security Bureau's forensic identification institute later confirmed that the substance contained MDMA components. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liang and Zhou during the court hearing. These facts are also substantiated by documentary evidence including the case registration form, household registration certificates, arrest records, evidence preservation list, the Wuzhou Public Security Bureau forensic report (Wu Gong [Criminal] Identification [Chemistry] No. 092 [2015]), inspection reports from the county public security bureau, transcripts of investigations, identification records, identification photos and explanations, on-site inspection transcripts, on-site photos, identification photos, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Liang and Zhou, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that, starting in May 2015, defendants Zhao and Mao were hired at a nameless gambling machine room located about 100 meters west of the intersection of Yaohai West Road and Longmenling Road in a district of a certain city, on the south side of the road. Defendant Zhao was responsible for managing operations inside the establishment, while defendant Mao was in charge of lookout duties and machine maintenance outside. On October 16, 2015, police officers raided the gambling machine room and seized eight \"Six Lions Dynasty Link-Up\" gambling machines and one \"Fishing Machine,\" totaling 14 operation units, along with gambling funds amounting to 5,530 RMB. Testing revealed that these gambling machines were equipped with functions for crediting, deducting, adding points on the screen, setting odds, and small stakes for big wins.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: In early September 2015, Guo (handled in a separate case) learned through QQ chat with the defendants Liu and Xie that Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County would start on September 4, 2015, and agreed to meet at the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court on the opening day. On the afternoon of September 4, Xie, Liu, and Lü, as usual, gathered at the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court to go to school together. Guo brought the defendants Liang and Pan (escaped) to the entrance of Mengjin County People's Court. Guo and Liang had previously conspired to commit robbery against the students at Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County, and upon meeting, informed Liu of their plan, asking Liu to provide assistance. Subsequently, Guo and Liang bought a fruit knife from a general store opposite Mengjin County People's Court. Knowing that Liang and others were going to the school to commit a crime, Liu still put the fruit knife into his school bag. Later, Guo gave Liang 40 yuan for travel expenses to go to Lao Cheng High School in Mengjin County, but Guo did not go. On the way, Xie and Lü knew about going to the school to steal money, and Liang, fearing he was too old to enter the school, discussed using Xie’s school bag to disguise as a student to enter the school, while Liu carried the school bag containing the fruit knife into the school. That afternoon, after Liang and Pan entered the school with the help of Liu and Xie, Xie a", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that from February 15 to March 6, 2014, defendant Lin A (handled in another case) organized more than 30 gambling events in a simple shed at No. 5, Ge Xi, Gaosu Village, Bailongshan Street, a county (defendant Lin's home). He recruited and attracted more than 20 people, including Ye A, Chen, Qiu, to participate in gambling, making a profit of more than 17,000 RMB from it. During this period, defendant Lin A arranged for defendants Zhong, Jiang, Wu, and Lin B (handled in another case) to help at the casino and paid them wages. Defendant Lin knowingly provided the venue for Lin A and others to operate the casino and occasionally helped with the skim, making a profit of about 1,100 RMB; Defendant Zhong acted as security for the casino and helped with the skimming in over 30 gambling events, making a profit of over 1,800 RMB; Defendant Jiang acted as a lookout for more than 20 gambling events, making a profit of about 800 RMB, during which the casino skimmed profits totaling over 14,000 RMB; Defendant Wu was responsible for managing the gambling apparatus and skim funds in more than 30 events and occasionally helped with skimming, making a profit of over 1,000 RMB. After the incident, defendant Wu voluntarily surrendered to the county public security bureau on April 2, 2014, and truthfully confessed his criminal acts. During the trial, defendants Lin, Zhong, Jiang, and Wu each respectively handed over their illegal proceeds to the court: 1,100 RMB, 1,800 RMB, 800 RMB, and 1,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were undisputed and confessed by defendants Lin A, Lin, Zhong, Jiang, and Wu during the court trial, and were confirmed by confessions and defenses from defendants Lin A, Lin, Zhong, Jiang, Wu, and Lin B, testimonies of witnesses Qiu, Chen, and Ye among 30 other people, the process of being brought to justice, the process of capture, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, population information forms, recognition records, and photos among other evidence, sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city accused that Zhou Jia (already sentenced) had sporadic conflicts with the victim Zhang Bing due to setting up stalls and other life incidents. Zhou Jia instructed the defendant Zhou and Zhou Yi (already sentenced) to gather the defendant Guan as well as Li Jia, Li Yi, and Liu Jia (all three already sentenced), along with Zhu (to be handled in a separate case), and on August 12, 2015, at around 11 p.m., at the \"Barbecue Inn\" opposite the east gate of the Jinxiu Huacheng Community in a certain city, they used means such as punching, kicking, and striking with sticks to beat Zhang Bing, resulting in injuries. According to the assessment, Zhang Bing's injury on the right mastoid region was classified as minor injury level one, the injury on the left scapular region was classified as minor injury level two, and the surface abrasions, contusions on the right shoulder and right elbow were classified as slight injuries.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Guan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On the afternoon of June 13, 2015, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the AB4 passage of the frozen market at the agricultural and sideline products logistics center located in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the vehicle with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Zhuang, by opening the car door, and stole one box each of frozen beef, frozen pork ribs, and frozen cooked shrimp, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,635 RMB. In the early morning of June 30, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the east gate of Lianghui Frozen Goods Store at the aquatic market of the agricultural and sideline products logistics center in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the van with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Zhu, by opening the car door, and stole one box of frozen pork bones, one box of frozen pig feet, one box of frozen pork ribs, two boxes of frozen pork shank bones, 20 pounds of pork head meat, 30 pounds of cooked intestines, four pig livers, four pig stomachs, and four pairs of pig kidneys, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,585 RMB. At noon on July 2, the defendants Yuan and Ma went to the eighth row of the parking lot at the west gate of the frozen market of the agricultural and sideline products logistics center in Liangzhu Street, a certain district of a certain city. They entered the van with license plate AXXXXX, parked there by the victim Wang, by opening the car door, and stole two boxes of frozen squid and one box of frozen bones, with the stolen goods totaling a value of 1,313 RMB.", "label": {"Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on November 27, 2012, at around 11 PM, the defendants Yin, Wei, Zhang, and others went to the town of Chengguan in Linquan County to sing at Vitesse KTV. In the lobby, due to a dispute over a bill, Li had an altercation with the cashier. Yin and the others tried to intervene and got into a dispute with Li. Subsequently, Yin, Wei, Zhang, and others assaulted Li, resulting in fractures of the left third to eleventh ribs and left transverse processes of T12, L1, and L2 vertebrae for Li. According to the forensic medical examination by Linquan County Public Security Bureau, the injuries Li sustained were considered minor injuries. Furthermore, after the incident, each of the defendants Yin, Wei, and Zhang compensated the victim Li for various economic losses in the amount of 25,000 yuan, obtaining forgiveness. Defendant Wei voluntarily surrendered to the Linquan County Public Security Bureau on April 25, 2013, and defendant Zhang did so on September 11, 2013. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial. These facts are confirmed by evidence such as material evidence shown and identified in court, documents verified through court investigation procedures, including the registration form of case acceptance, the notice of case filing, household registration certificates, records of surrender, statements, hospital records, mediation agreements, letters of forgiveness, receipts, testimonies from witnesses such as Li and Liu, statements by the victim Li, inspection and identification records, and appraisal opinions, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses the defendants Tang, Deng, and Fan of conspiring to extort money from others by staging fake traffic accidents, known as \"pengci.\" On May 24 and 29, 2015, the defendant Deng drove his white Toyota Reiz car, with the license plate \"S×××××,\" accompanied by defendants Tang and Fan from a certain city to the Dongchangling Village section in Lingui District on National Highway 321, and to a section in a certain town and village in Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County at 733KM on National Highway 321. They extorted 2,000 RMB from the victim Liang and 3,000 RMB from the victim Long using \"pengci\" tactics.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Bayan Nur City charges that in 2017, defendants Gao, Si, and Zhang1, after inspecting certain locations and the \"Zhai Yi Shou Company,\" jointly invested in and established Yishun Information Technology Co., Ltd. on July 6, 2017. Gao served as the legal representative of the company, while Si and Zhang1 were shareholders. After its establishment, the company neither put up a sign with its name nor operated within the scope of business recorded in its business license. Instead, it put up a sign for \"Zhai Yi Shou Company\" to undertake and carry out illegal debt collection activities. During this period, a relatively fixed criminal syndicate was formed, with Gao and Si as the main leaders, and Liu1, He, Xu, Ren, Yang, Zhang1, Yun, Li1, Luo, Liu2, Huang, Feng, Liu6, and Wan (all of whom have been sentenced) as other members. The criminal syndicate, during its criminal activities, involved Zhang1 and the \"Zhai Yi Shou Company\" business personnel in soliciting debt collection services, signing commission collection agreements and power of attorney documents with creditors. After Gao reviewed the relevant documents, Gao or Si would assign \"orders\" to Liu1, He, Xu, Ren, Yang, and other collection personnel. The assigned personnel, along with other debt collectors from \"Zhai Yi Shou Company\" or temporarily gathered idle individuals from the community, would use methods such as harassment, causing disturbances, abuse, pestering, intimidation, threats, gathering crowds to create momentum, etc., to pursue debtors for payments. The syndicate committed wrongdoing, oppressed the people, seriously disrupted economic and social life order, caused a bad social impact, inflicted immense psychological coercion on the victims, led to public misunderstanding of the societal law and order situation, and caused some negative impacts on the work of judicial organs. The specific criminal acts", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Si": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dou": ["Imprisonment"], "Bao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the evening of May 18, 2019, the defendants Wang, Li, Shi, and others went to a KTV in a certain alley in Meiguang, a town in Qianqi, to drink. Around midnight on May 19, 2019, the defendants Wang, Li, Shi, and Liu had finished drinking and were chatting in front of the KTV when they encountered the victim Sun and his friends coming out of the Jinbawan KTV. At this time, defendant Wang inexplicably insulted the victim Sun and his friends. The victim Sun and defendant Wang insulted each other, after which defendants Wang, Li, and Shi assaulted the victim Sun. After the assault, the three defendants attempted to take a taxi to flee the scene but were stopped by the victim Sun. The three defendants then fled on foot, and the victim Sun called the police. After the incident, it was determined by the Bayannur City Jinqiao Forensic Identification Institute that the victim Sun's injury constituted minor injury of the second degree. Defendants Wang, Li, and Shi compensated the victim Sun 15,000 RMB and obtained the victim Sun's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Wang, Li, and Shi during the trial. There are also materials such as the victim Sun's report and statement, the acceptance registration form made by Qianqi Public Security Bureau, the case filing decision, the course of arrival, site inspection record, site map and photos, identification record and photos, evidence collection notice, evidence collection list, the victim Sun's inpatient medical records and diagnosis certificate from the Qianqi People's Hospital, administrative penalty decision, release from detention proof, compulsory isolation detoxification decisions for defendants Wang and Li, engagement letter with Bayannur City Jinqiao Forensic Identification Institute, forensic identification opinion letter, identification opinion notice, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Liu, Luo, Song, Liu, mediation agreement, understanding letter, defendants Wang, Li, Shi's confession, and household registration verification among other evidence that can fully confirm the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Shi": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges: From early November 2017 to mid-December of the same year, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu colluded at a storefront located at the west gate of Sunshine Apartments, Lizhou Street in the city, placing two eight-station fishing video game machines to provide a gambling environment for others. From mid-December to December 28 of the same year, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu moved the aforementioned two video game machines to a bungalow located at Mingshan 28-1, Mingwei Village, Lizhou Street in the city to provide a gambling environment for Wan, Huang, Shen, and others. The aforementioned two gambling machines generated illegal profits totaling over 33,000 RMB during the aforementioned placement period. According to the identification by Yuyao City Public Security Bureau, the two aforementioned eight-station fishing video game machines both have functions allowing for coin entry and withdrawal, gambling on small stakes for larger returns. On December 28, 2017, defendants Cheng, Liu, and Xu were apprehended by police officers. To prove the aforementioned facts, the prosecution provided corresponding evidence to the court.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on April 21, 2015, at approximately 21:00, the defendants Liu and Xiao together entered the \"MINISO\" store in the underground mall of Zhongmin Baihui in Siming District, a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Huang's unpreparedness, they stole an \"Apple\" iPhone 5S worth 2,766 RMB from the pocket of his jacket. On May 1, 2015, Liu and Xiao were apprehended outside Robinson Square in Siming District of a certain city. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts, yet the stolen phone has not been recovered. During the court proceedings, both defendants Liu and Xiao did not object to the above facts, and these facts are corroborated by the victim Huang’s statement, the evidence retrieval notice, evidence list, surveillance video, and screenshots, the price appraisal conclusion from the municipal price appraisal center, the appraisal opinion notice, the pre-trial confessions and defenses of the two defendants, relevant identification records, photos, the account of the case provided by the public security organ, explanation of circumstances, household registration proofs, criminal record materials, and legal documents on coercive measures, sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged that on the evening of March 18, 2014, the defendants Dai and Zhang, with the intent of making a profit, gathered Lu, Chen, Gao, and Zhao (all handled in separate cases) among others, to gamble using mahjong tiles in the form of \"Niuniu\" at Room 203, Building 4, Victory New Village, a certain town in the city. They gained a total of 7,600 RMB in profits through taking a cut. After being apprehended, defendant Dai truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. Following the incident, 7,600 RMB in illicit profits were seized and are currently held by the local Public Security Bureau; 40 mahjong tiles and 2 dice were seized and are currently held by this court. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Dai and Zhang during the trial and were corroborated by witness testimonies from Chen, Zhao, Song, Gao, Sun, Feng, Lu, Wu, Jiang, Huang, Jiang, Zhuo, Cheng, Zhou A, Zhou B, Zhu, Wang, Ji, along with phone records of reports, inspection transcripts, evidence preservation lists, photos, seizure transcripts, seizure lists, restitution lists, attached evidence and item transfer lists, administrative penalty decisions, confiscated item lists, case investigation records, arrest records, confessions from defendants Dai and Zhang, basic information of permanent residents, administrative penalty decisions, and decisions on forced isolation for drug rehabilitation, all of which are sufficient to confirm the facts, as acknowledged by this court.", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a city charges: On February 14, 2012, at around 18:00, Chen B (already sentenced) was invited to meet with the victim, Gao, at the May Red Hotel on Nanyuan Street, within a certain district of a city, to discuss their economic dispute. Chen B, fearing he might be at a disadvantage if a fight broke out during the negotiation, gathered the defendants Chen, Feng, and Ling (already sentenced), among others, to go along to the May Red Hotel. Upon arriving at the hotel entrance, defendant Chen followed Chen B into the hotel lobby to negotiate with the victim, Gao, while defendant Feng and others waited in the car. The negotiation failed, leading to a scuffle. Defendant Chen then notified defendant Feng and others that a fight had broken out inside. Defendant Feng, together with Ling, each armed with a piece of rebar, rushed into the hotel lobby. Defendant Feng then used the rebar to strike victim Gao, who was grappling with defendant Chen, resulting in injuries to Gao. Forensic examination determined that victim Gao sustained fractures to the left 8th and 9th ribs due to trauma, with the injuries classified as minor. After the incident, the relatives of defendants Chen and Feng compensated the victim Gao for economic losses, gaining Gao's understanding. On August 1, 2012, defendants Chen and Feng voluntarily turned themselves in at the Nanyuan Police Station of a district’s Public Security Bureau, truthfully confessing the criminal facts. The evidence for the prosecution includes: victim Chen A; witness testimonies; forensic medical injury assessment report; surveillance footage; household registration proof, police administrative penalty decision, explanatory note, identification records; defendants' confessions and statements in defense, etc.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Feng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution charges that the defendants Hou and Sun sold drugs to others, and their actions violated Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for crime x. To substantiate the above charges, the prosecution submitted evidence such as the defendants' confessions and defenses, witness testimonies, identification records, and household registration certificates. The defendants Hou and Sun do not object to the facts and charges put forth by the prosecution. The defense for defendant Sun argued that Sun had shown meritorious behavior; he voluntarily confessed to drug trafficking facts that the judicial authorities were not yet aware of, constituting a voluntary surrender, and he pleaded guilty in court, being a first-time and occasional offender, and suggested leniency in punishment. Upon examination, it was found that at about 10 a.m. on March 25, 2015, defendant Hou sold 0.2 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to Sun at the price of 500 yuan in the corridor on the first floor of Building XX, Unit X, District II, a certain city. Later, defendant Sun sold the above-mentioned methamphetamine to Wang for 1000 yuan in Room XXX of a certain securities training center at a certain town in the same city. At noon that day, the police officers from the Police Station of a city's Public Security Bureau, based on a report from others, apprehended Wang suspected of drug use in the lobby of the same securities training center and subsequently arrested Sun in Room XXX of the center. Wang confessed to purchasing methamphetamine from Sun, and later Sun confessed to selling methamphetamine to Wang. On March 26, Sun assisted police officers in arresting Hou at Household XXX, Unit X, Building XX, District II, a certain city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Hou and Sun during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence, including the case registration form, the case development and solving records, arrest proofs, testimonies from witnesses Wang and Dai, on-site testing reports, identification records and photos, evidence preservation, and seizure lists, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificates. The evidence was verified and testified to be sufficient in court to establish the conviction of crime x for the two defendants. During the trial, the prosecution, considering the criminal facts and sentencing circumstances of the two defendants, suggested lenient punishment as both confessed their crimes truthfully and had no prior criminal records.", "label": {"Hou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on the evening of March 22, 2016, the defendants Mei and others encountered Wang at the flagship skating rink in the Shuguang Trade City of this district. Defendant Mei, on the grounds that Wang caused Wang M. to become pregnant, demanded compensation. Subsequently, defendant Tao, upon invitation from defendant Mei, arrived, and they together took Wang to borrow money, which was unsuccessful. Mei and Tao used verbal threats to force Wang to transfer money via Alipay and pay a total of 7,000 yuan in cash. On May 11, 2016, the public security authorities arrested defendants Mei and Tao. After the case, the relatives of the two defendants compensated the victim for the economic loss of 9,000 yuan and received forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not contested by Mei and Tao during the trial. The facts are substantiated by verified evidence, including records of arrest and case resolution, the victim Wang's report materials, statements, and identification records, testimony and identification records from witnesses Chen and Wang M., testimony from witnesses Zheng, Zeng, and Yu, outpatient records from a provincial medical institution, IOUs, Alipay transfer and cash withdrawal transaction details, letters of forgiveness and receipts, and the interrogation records and identity information of defendants Tao and Mei, which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Mei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in the early morning of June 3, 2014, the defendants Chen and Zhang, after prior discussion, drove a scooter to a city to look for a target to rob. At around 4 a.m., the two drove past the public restroom in the Gaokantou community of Gucheng Street, saw the victim Hou walking alone, and developed malicious intent. They approached Hou, pushed him to the ground, and despite Hou's resistance, they beat and threatened him, stealing a handbag and a white Gionee phone from him before fleeing the scene by vehicle. Later, they found 30 yuan in cash in the stolen handbag and discarded the bag. On June 11, 2014, the defendant Chen was captured by the police in Hengfeng Street, Wenling City; on the night of June 13, 2014, the defendant Zhang was captured by the police in a district of a city. After apprehension, both defendants truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Chen and Zhang during the court trial and were corroborated by evidence such as the victim Hou's testimony, search records and photos, lists and photos of seized and returned items, on-site inspection records and photos, identification records, the process of apprehension, and household registration certificates. The facts of this case are clear and sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges that between April and May 2016, the defendants Tu, Du, and Ji conspired and organized gambling gatherings approximately 10 times in locations such as Room 801, Unit 2, Building 30, Fudi Youyicheng Community, Qiao Street, a nameless card room in the same community, and Qiao Hotel card room, all situated in a certain district of a certain city. The gatherings involved playing cards in the form of \"Little Nine\" for cash, from which they drew a profit of over 73,000 RMB. During this period, the defendant Huang was responsible for collecting the rake at the gambling venues, participated in 5 gambling sessions, and was involved in rake profits amounting to over 41,000 RMB. The evidence used for the accusation includes witness testimonies; documentary evidence such as household registration certificates and explanatory notes; identification records; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Tu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on the night of May 12, 2013, the defendants Yang and Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Gao, and Wang (all five have been sentenced) had a dispute over the phone and agreed to meet for a fight at the crossroads of a certain village in a certain county. Yang then gathered the defendant Li and, along with Zhou, Kou Zhuang, and Lü A (all three have been sentenced), engaged in an armed fight with Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Gao, Wang, and others at the western end of the crossroads in the west village of a certain township. The fight resulted in minor injuries to Yang and slight injuries to Kou Zhuang, Li Wei, and Li Nan. On October 25, 2013, both parties reached a compensation agreement. These criminal facts were undisputed by the defendants Yang and Li during the trial and were corroborated by evidence including household registration certificates, a report from the county police department, the process of apprehension by the Shangqiu City Public Security Bureau, site photographs, a statement from the county police department, witness testimony from Wang, a forensic medical assessment report on bodily injuries, confessions and defenses from co-defendants Li Nan, Li Wei, Sun Kai, Kou Zhuang, Zhou, Gao, Wang A, Lü B, Feng Kai, and agreement documents and receipts, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On October 8, 2013, at around 12 p.m., defendants Zhou and Wu, at the entrance of the north gate of the Fukang grocery hall on Hanzhong Street in a certain district of this city, committed theft by having defendant Zhou drive an electric scooter as backup while defendant Wu executed the theft. Taking advantage of the victim Gao’s unguarded moment, they stole a black plastic bag placed on the footrest of the scooter. The plastic bag contained 10 packs of Huang cigarettes and 2 packs of Su cigarettes. The stolen goods have been sold off, and the proceeds squandered. After receiving the report, the public security bureau investigated and arrested the two defendants on October 12, 2013. Appraisal and evaluation determined the cigarettes were valued at 2,100 RMB. During the investigation, the relatives of the two defendants voluntarily compensated the victim for all economic losses. The above-mentioned facts are uncontested by defendants Zhou and Wu during the trial, supported by the victim's testimony; materials from the public security bureau outlining the process of arrest and case resolution; criminal forensic photographs showing the defendants identifying the theft scene; invoices and receipts for the cigarettes provided by the victim; a price appraisal opinion issued by the Price Verification Branch of the District Bureau of Commodity Pricing of a certain district in a certain city; the criminal judgment document from the People’s Court of a certain district in a certain province (2008) ×× Criminal First Instance No. ××; as well as the confessions and defenses provided by defendants Zhou and Wu. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: From 2011 to December 2012, the defendants Han, Zhu, Gu, and Yin jointly invested to establish the \"Yi River Sand Field.\" After obtaining approval from the city's Bureau of Land and Resources and the river management department, they carried out sand mining activities within the Yi River riverbed between the Caoqiao Town 323 Provincial Road Yi River Bridge and the highway bridge. The mining license for the sand field expired on December 22, 2012. From January to November 2013, without a mining license, the defendants Han, Zhu, Gu, and Yin continued to instruct sand ship owners such as Hao to conduct sand mining activities within this river channel. According to an appraisal by the Jiangsu Institute of Geological Survey, the volume of the sand piles on site was 5,162.2 cubic meters. According to an appraisal by a certain city's Price Certification Center, the value of the sand on site was RMB 193,261. Defendants Han, Zhu, and Gu were respectively criminally detained by the city's Public Security Bureau on February 24, 2014, released on bail on March 18, 2014, criminally detained again on April 23, 2014, arrested with the approval of the city's People's Procuratorate on May 15, 2014, and arrested by the city’s Public Security Bureau the next day. Defendant Yin voluntarily surrendered to the city’s Public Security Bureau on March 11, 2014, was released on bail on the same day, criminally detained on April 23, 2014, and arrested with the approval of the city's People’s Procuratorate on May 15, 2014, and arrested by the city's Public Security Bureau the next day. The above facts were not disputed by the four defendants during the trial and were confirmed by evidence such as the documentation provided by the city's Public Security Bureau regarding the case breakthrough and the defendants coming to the case, household registration certificates, appraisal reports by the Jiangsu Provincial Department of Land and Resources, and the Jiangsu Institute of Geological Survey, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the evening of April 25, 2013, defendants Li and Zhang went to the southern section of Jianshe Road in a certain city, in front of the \"Yajumingdenghui\" lighting store, south of the \"Galaxy Gas Station,\" and stole a King brand electric tricycle that victim Zhao had parked unlocked in front of the store. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric tricycle was valued at 2,590 yuan. The evidence supporting the above facts includes the confessions and defenses of the defendants, the statements of the victim, the appraisal opinion, documentary evidence, etc. The actions of Li and Zhang should be pursued for criminal responsibility as crime X, and both are identified as principal offenders, both with mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender, and it is requested to impose a sentence according to law. It has also been found: During the period of compulsory drug rehabilitation, defendants Li and Zhang truthfully confessed facts about theft crimes that the judicial authorities had not yet known. The above facts were also undisputed by defendants Li and Zhang during the court trial, and were corroborated by evidence such as the statement of victim Zhao, the electric vehicle sales receipt, the price appraisal opinion letter, the appraisal opinion notification, records of police reports, basic population information inquiry, the process of being brought to justice, report materials, proof of inquiry into previous offenses, and the criminal judgment, which are sufficient for establishment.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges that on September 24, 2015, at around 16:30, the defendant Liang, along with Wang, near the Jinshangcheng area of a certain city, under the guise of card swiping for cash, took advantage of the victim's moment of withdrawing money to cancel the POS machine transaction, thereby defrauding 18,800 yuan. On the same day, around 19:30, the defendant Liang, together with Wang, using the same method near the Minsheng Square in the Dongsheng District of a certain city, defrauded victim Zhang of 38,690 yuan in cash. In summary, the defendant Liang, in collaboration with Wang, committed two frauds totaling 57,490 yuan. The prosecution has submitted evidence to confirm this, including residence registration proof, resident population information, a list of evidence received, identification records and photos, UnionPay business transaction vouchers, the criminal judgment No. 149 (2016) Chudi 0302 Criminal First, the criminal ruling No. 234 (2016) Chudi 03 Criminal Final, receipts and letters of understanding, investigation reports, statements from the victims, reporting materials, the defendants' confessions and defenses, as well as synchronized audio and video recordings.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charged: At around 1 a.m. on June 13, 2014, defendants Li and Fan, along with friends, arrived at a hotel in a certain district of this city with the intention of checking in. The hotel receptionist, Guang, stated that an ID card was necessary to process the check-in. Dissatisfied with Guang's response, Li picked up items from the hotel's front desk, such as the telephone, money counter, and computer monitor, and threw them at Guang. Li also attempted to climb over the front desk to assault Guang, but was restrained by Fan and friends. Subsequently, they left the hotel, and Guang called the police. Upon receiving the report, the police arrived at the hotel and found Li and Fan nearby. The police identified themselves and asked the two to cooperate for an investigation at the police station, but they refused. At the hotel entrance, inside the police car, and at the police station, Li kicked law enforcement officers Dai and Gu and attempted to strangle officer Yang with his arm. Fan struck officer Gao on the face and ear with his hand and bag, and hit officer Gu on the head with a phone. Thereafter, defendants Li and Fan were apprehended by the police. After being taken into custody, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. Following the incident, defendants Li and Fan compensated the hotel for related economic losses, and the hotel issued a written statement of understanding, expressing forgiveness for their actions. The facts mentioned above were not contested by the two defendants during the trial. The evidence is supported by testimonies from witnesses Hu, Guang, Gao, Gu, Cao, Dai, Liu, Yu, Hu, Ding A, and Ding B; the case registration form; identification records; Li's previous conviction materials; the comprehensive information sheet for released prisoners; the medical records of Guang, Gao, and Tao; copies of police officer certificates; receipts and a letter of understanding issued by the Ared Hotel; the defendants' recorded identifications of the crime scene; photos; site location maps; video materials; and evidence provided by the police on the process of apprehension, inquiry proof, and household registration information. This is sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Fan": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from around 2:00 AM to 8:00 AM on December 5, 2019, the defendants Yang and Ding were together at Haidilao Hot Pot, where they ate and drank alcohol. Despite knowing that Yang had consumed alcohol, Ding still handed over his car, a small sedan with the license plate number Su C×××××, to Yang to drive, while Ding sat in the passenger seat. Later, as Yang drove the car on the road around the city from west to east, reaching the intersection of Fuxing North Road and the Ring Road, he was stopped by on-duty police officers. According to the evidence appraisal by the Traffic Police Brigade of Xuzhou Public Security Bureau, ethanol was detected in the venous blood of defendant Yang, with a concentration of 124.0 mg/100 ml of blood. After the incident, defendant Yang was apprehended by the public security authorities. Defendant Ding was summoned orally by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the criminal facts. The defendants Yang and Ding did not object to the aforementioned facts during the trial, backed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Liang; the driver’s breath alcohol content test record and result sheet; blood sample extraction registration form, blood sample photos, and the examination report issued by the evidence appraisal room of the Traffic Police Brigade of the Xuzhou Public Security Bureau; photocopies of the motor vehicle driving license and vehicle registration certificate as well as related query result sheets; dining receipts; audiovisual materials of the scene of apprehension, blood sample collection, and the defendants’ dining and drinking at Haidilao; case registration form, circumstances of apprehension, case solution report, explanation, and household registration certificate, etc. These pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on the afternoon of June 22, 2016, defendants He and Yang, after prior consultation, took advantage of a moment when no one was present to steal 3,000 yuan in cash from a suitcase belonging to Liu, who shared the same dormitory at \"Shaoxing Zhentuo Textile Co., Ltd.\" in the Binhai Industrial Zone of a certain district in a certain city. After the incident, defendants He and Yang returned the 3,000 yuan in cash to Liu. Further investigation revealed that after being brought to justice, defendants He and Yang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants He and Yang during the court trial. The facts are corroborated by evidence, including photos of the stolen money, lists of seized and returned items, records of the capture process, testimony from Yang A, statements from Liu, and identification records from He and Yang, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"He": ["Fine"], "Yang": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that at approximately 9 PM on August 7, 2016, defendants Yang and Long conspired and went to a construction site near \"Guojing Mingpin Furniture City\" on Lanjiang Street in this city. They entered the construction site using methods such as climbing over walls and staircases, and reached the sixth floor pipeline well of the site, where they cut two cables. Then, they proceeded to the twelfth floor pipeline well, cut the same two cables, and extracted the copper wires, stealing a total of 40 meters of cable valued at RMB 5343.2. On August 15, 2016, defendants Yang and Long were apprehended by the city police officers. After the crime, Long's family compensated the victim, Han, for economic losses amounting to RMB 9300 and obtained Han's understanding. During the trial, defendants Yang and Long did not object to the above facts. The evidence, including documentary photographs, \"arrest process\" documents, personal information, criminal reconciliation agreement, receipts, victim Han's statements, price appraisal report, recognition transcript and photographs, sufficiently corroborates the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Long": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that defendant Zhang, on June 23, 2017, and August 7, 2017, respectively, used his WeChat account named \"An\" to create two WeChat groups: \"High-Quality Players of Play Two Circles Official\" and \"New 200-Year Good Friends.\" He organized individuals in these two groups to gamble using the \"Play Two Circles\" mobile Mahjong software, collecting a rake of 5 yuan and 10 yuan per game from the two groups respectively. As of November 20, 2017, the total rake amounted to 180,885 yuan. Starting from September 13, 2017, because defendant Zhang was interviewed by his supervisor, the management of the aforementioned WeChat gambling groups was taken over by defendant Jiang, while defendant Zhang assisted in maintaining group order, enlivening the atmosphere, and occasionally collecting room fees. As of November 20, 2017, the total rake amounted to 91,150 yuan. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Jiang truthfully confessed and returned the entire illegal income of 180,885 yuan. These facts were not contested by defendants Zhang and Jiang during the trial, and are corroborated by witness testimonies from Zhang, Han, and others; basic population information, case registration forms, seizure records, extraction records, statement descriptions extracted by the Xinghua Municipal Public Security Bureau; photographic electronic data by the Xinghua Municipal Public Security Bureau, and other documentary evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a High-Tech Industrial Development Zone in a certain region charged: On January 12, 2015, at around 17:00, defendants Ci and Li went to the basement storage room of 9 households in Shenghua Garden Community, located in the High-Tech Industrial Development Zone of a certain region in a certain province. Using technical means to pry open the door, they stole 24 bottles of 53-degree Moutai liquor, 12 bottles of 43-degree and 38-degree Moutai liquor, 6 bottles of 52-degree Wuliangye liquor, 12 bottles of 39-degree Wuliangye liquor, and two police uniform shirts from victim Xu. The stolen liquor was appraised to be worth RMB 48,006. For the above charges, the prosecution suggested conviction and punishment based on the relevant article of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. It was also found that after the incident, the family of defendant Li compensated the victim for economic losses totaling RMB 30,000, and the victim expressed that he would no longer pursue compensation responsibility from defendant Li and requested leniency in punishment for him. Further investigation revealed that on July 10, 2011, defendant Ci was subjected to 15 days of administrative detention by the Weicheng Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city for theft; and on September 23, 2013, defendant Ci was subjected to 15 days of administrative detention by the Kuiwen Branch of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city for theft and fined RMB 500. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Ci and Li during the court trial, and are substantiated by evidence such as a motorcycle, screwdriver, T-shaped cone, and police uniform shirt photos, documentary evidence of the arrest process, investigation and case-solving process, crime scene screenshots, search warrant, seizure decision book, seizure list, basic information of permanent residents, phone inquiry records, public security administrative penalty decision book, case handling explanations, letter of understanding, statement of victim Xu, witness testimony, appraisal opinion on the value of the involved items, on-site inspection records, search records, seizure records, identification records, and confessions of defendants Ci and Li, which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Ci": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: From April 11, 2014, to May 1, 2014, the defendant Zhang operated a casino using \"Tongbao\" for gambling purposes in the back mountain of a new village in a certain city. The defendant Zhang invested 5,000 yuan to host and gamble with participants. During the casino's operation, the defendant Zhang hired the defendant Guan and Liao Moujia (separately processed) to transport customers to the mountain casino. The defendant Zhang gained a profit of 5,300 yuan during the casino's operation, and the defendant Guan gained 2,200 yuan from the casino. After the incident, the defendants Zhang and Guan voluntarily turned themselves in to the public security authorities on August 29, 2014, and May 25, 2014, respectively. The public security authorities lawfully seized illicit money of 5,300 yuan from the defendant Zhang and 2,200 yuan from the defendant Guan, which was not transferred with the case. The aforementioned facts are acknowledged by defendants Zhang and Guan during the trial process, and are confirmed by the following evidence provided by the public prosecution agency and verified by the court for legality, authenticity, and relevance, which this court confirms: 1. Testimonies from witnesses Song, Liu, Feng, Xu, Fan, Ye, Deng, Pan, and others; 2. Documentary evidence such as basic information of personnel, the process of bringing into custody, statements, and inquiry forms on the history of illegal activities and crimes; 3. Inspection records, seizure decision, seizure records, evidence preservation decision, inventory of seized items, and administrative penalty decision; 4. Identification records, identification scene records, and photographs; 5. Testimony of Liao Moujia, an accomplice in the same case; 6. Confessions of defendants Zhang and Guan. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to reach a verdict.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Guan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on May 31, 2013, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Wang and Hao, after consuming alcohol, along with the accomplice Xiao (who is being dealt with in a separate case), got into an argument with the victim Yu at the west ice bridge of the North Road Fishery Company dock in a certain city due to a dispute over the opening of the suspension bridge gate. During the altercation, they injured Yu's left eye, resulting in a corrected vision of less than 0.5. According to forensic examination, the injury to Yu's left eye was classified as minor. After the incident, the defendants Wang and Hao, along with the accomplice Xiao, surrendered themselves to the public security authorities and reached a settlement agreement regarding civil compensation with the victim, which was fully executed. These facts were not contested by the defendants Wang and Hao during the trial and are corroborated by the confessions of defendants Wang and Hao, the statement of the victim Yu, testimony from the witness Ji and others, the identification record, the forensic assessment of bodily injury (Document No. 74 [2014] from Zhi Public Security), the settlement agreement, and the report of the surrender to the authorities, all sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention"], "Hao": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: Between October 2015 and March 3, 2016, the defendants Dai and Ding conspired to set up an automatic mahjong table in an orchard at the southernmost part of Dongsheng, a village in a certain city’s Ditang Street. They provided conditions for gambling in the form of \"impact mahjong\" for individuals such as Hu, Tang, Gu, and Han, and gained over 8,000 yuan in profits through extracting fees from the games. On March 3, 2016, police officers from the city’s Public Security Bureau arrested the defendant Dai and seized an automatic mahjong table and 48 yuan on the spot. On the 8th of the same month, the defendant Ding voluntarily surrendered to the city’s Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. The stated facts were not disputed by the defendants Dai and Ding during the trial, and are substantiated by documentary evidence such as the \"arrest record,\" arrival record, seizure decision, seizure list, provincial detention receipt, city-specific item detention receipt, payment notice, photo documentation, personal information, testimonies from witnesses Hu, Tang, Gu, and Han, examination transcripts, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Dai": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been established that from July 2013 to January 2014, the defendants Qi and Guo, without obtaining any qualifications or fulfilling their legal obligations to ensure food safety, rented a factory building on the west side of a county's Guodian Power Plant to produce yuba (bean curd skin). They employed Zhu B (to be dealt with in a separate case) from a village in a town of a county in a certain province for technical support. To increase yuba production, the defendants Qi and Guo, together with Zhu A, added additives containing sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and boric acid during the production process. The produced yuba was sold in various locations, including the county, with the sales amount involved reaching 440,000 yuan. It was also found that on March 4, 2014, the defendants Qi and Guo voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of the county. On July 1, 2014, the Public Security Bureau issued a decision document No. Feigong Zhuijiao Zi (2014) 00018 to recover 100,000 yuan of illegal gains from defendants Qi and Guo. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Qi and Guo during the trial and are substantiated by household registration certificates, a list of seized items by the county's Public Security Bureau, physical evidence examination reports, testimonies from witnesses Chen Mouqin, Chen Mouyin, Li Moukai, among others; identification records, and the confessions of defendants Qi and Guo, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Qi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The District People's Procuratorate charges that on June 6, 2018, at approximately 1:00 PM, defendants Zhang and Wang rode a scooter to the district's building. Defendant Zhang acted as a lookout while defendant Wang used an altered knife to pry open a grey Meiying Shensu-brand electric bicycle that belonged to the victim, Chen, which was parked there. Defendant Zhang then rode it away. Later, the two defendants were apprehended by police while fleeing the scene. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at 2,388 yuan. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The evidence presented by the prosecution to the court regarding the above charges includes: physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim's statements, defendants' confessions and defenses, expert opinions, etc.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges: On December 10, 2016, at around 1 PM, the defendant Yu was drinking at a friend's housewarming party at Xinguang Square, Hetang District, Zhuzhou City, when he received a call from his friend Zhao. Zhao stated that he had been involved in a traffic accident at the intersection in front of the Media Building in Tianyuan District, Zhuzhou City, and asked for his assistance. At that time, the defendant Zhao was sitting with the defendant Yu, and since defendant Zhao also knew Zhao, both defendants Yu and Zhao took a taxi to the accident scene. Without first understanding the situation of the accident, defendants Yu and Zhao got into a conflict with the BYD 4S shop employee who was assessing the damage at the scene, the victim Liu. Defendant Yu knocked the victim Liu to the ground. After being separated by bystanders, as the victim Liu was running towards the roadside, he was kicked from behind by defendant Zhao, causing him to fall to the ground. Judicial appraisal determined that the victim Liu sustained minor injuries categorized as Level 2. Defendants Yu and Zhao voluntarily surrendered to the public security agency, truthfully confessed their criminal acts, and actively compensated the victim Liu for medical expenses and other costs totaling 50,000 yuan. They also obtained the victim Liu's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yu and Zhao during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence including the report filed by You, the statements of the victim Liu, testimonies of witnesses You, Zhao, Liu, and Zhao, identification records and photos, the dashboard camera footage from Liu's vehicle, the forensic medical injury assessment report No. [2016] 886 issued by the Criminal Science and Technology Research Institute of Zhuzhou City Public Security Bureau, the hospital records of the victim Liu, the case record provided by the Tianyuan Branch of Zhuzhou City Public Security Bureau, the receipt and letter of forgiveness issued by the victim Liu, and the household registration information of defendants Yu and Zhao, all of which are sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on July 13, 2017, the defendant Zhao deceived the victim, Liu, to bring them to a MLM organization den located in a certain city, \"a certain place in Tianjin,\" for the purpose of recruiting new members. Later, along with defendants Tang and Wang, Zhao attempted to persuade the victim Liu to join. At around 9 AM on July 16, when Liu expressed the desire to leave, defendants Zhao, Tang, and Wang prevented him from doing so. They closely followed Liu, strictly monitoring him, thereby restricting his personal freedom and controlling his usage of his phone until around 10 AM on July 17, 2017, when Liu was rescued by the police. After being apprehended, defendants Zhao, Tang, and Wang truthfully confessed the above criminal acts. These facts were undisputed by defendants Zhao, Tang, Wang, and the defense counsel, Pan, during the trial process. The evidence submitted by the prosecution—including the case registration form, the account of the apprehension of the three defendants, the confessions and statements of the three defendants, the victim’s statement, the identification records and photos, and the permanent resident information forms of the three defendants—sufficiently confirm these facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment"], "Tang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiangdu District, Yangzhou City, a certain province, charged that on the early morning of September 8, 2018, the defendant Chen had a verbal altercation over the phone with \"Mao\" (identity unknown) regarding his girlfriend Wang (phonetic). During this time, \"Mao\" used the victim Ni's phone to call the defendant Chen, and they agreed to meet at Huimin Hospital in Jiangdu District, Yangzhou City, a certain province. Later, the defendant Chen gathered the defendants Li, Dai, and others to go to Huimin East Road, preparing to fight. On Huimin East Road, unable to reach \"Mao\" by phone, the defendant Chen called victim Ni instead. After Ni's phone rang and he saw several people rushing toward him, he ran towards a nearby alley. The defendants Chen, Li, and Dai then pursued him, and after catching up to Ni, the defendants Chen and Li beat him by slapping and kicking him. After being assaulted, victim Ni ran into a nearby chess and card room to retrieve a kitchen ", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 11 p.m. on June 30, 2019, defendant Ren got into a conflict with Yang and others while dining at the \"So-and-So\" restaurant on Datong Road in Tengzhou City. Ren then gathered defendant Sun and others to go to the scene, where they assaulted Yang and Qiu at the restaurant entrance. Defendant Ren used a fruit knife to stab Yang and cut Qiu's hand. Forensic identification determined that Yang's injuries constituted minor injury of the second degree, and Qiu's injuries constituted slight injury. It was also found that on July 31, 2019, defendant Ren voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the details of the crime. During the trial, defendants Sun and Ren reached a settlement agreement with civil plaintiffs Yang and Qiu, who withdrew their civil suits and forgave the actions of the two defendants. Defendants Sun and Ren voluntarily signed a plea agreement. These facts were not disputed by defendants Sun and Ren during the court hearing, and were corroborated by testimonies from victims Yang and Qiu, witnesses Ma, Yan, Yu, and others, identification records, expert opinions, audio-visual materials, explanations from the public security authorities regarding the case handling and capture process, the plea agreement, the letter of forgiveness, and electronic files of defendants Ren and Sun, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment"], "Ren": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged the defendants Han and Yu, stating that after premeditation, on the afternoon of April 5, 2014, they went to the Xiaokang Village market in the Southeast Street of a certain city with knives and chased and hacked Li, causing him injuries. According to forensic assessment, the injuries to the victim Li constitute minor injuries of the second degree. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution submitted relevant evidence. The prosecution believes that the defendants Han and Yu intentionally injured another person, resulting in minor injuries to one individual, and their actions should be pursued as a criminal offense of X. In this joint crime, both defendants Han and Yu are the principal offenders. After coming to the case, defendants Han and Yu truthfully confessed their crimes, allowing for lighter punishment. Defendants Han and Yu did not dispute the criminal facts charged by the prosecution. The main defense opinion of the defense lawyer, Chen, is that the defendant Yu has a good attitude of confession; played a minor role and is an accomplice; has no prior criminal record and is a first-time, occasional offender. In summary, leniency is requested. Upon investigation, it was found that on the afternoon of April 5, 2014, defendant Han had a dispute with Li, and after premeditation with Yu, they went to the Xiaokang Village market in the Southeast Street of a certain city and used punching and hacking methods to injure Li. According to forensic assessment, the injuries to the victim Li constitute minor injuries of the second degree. On May 1, 2014, the public security agency arrested defendant Han at the Suzhou Train Station; on the early morning of May 9, defendant Yu was arrested at a rental house at 22 Jinhua Road, Xiaokang Village, Southeast Street of a certain city. The above facts are confirmed by the following evidence submitted by the prosecution and examined and cross-examined in court, which this court confirms: the identification records of defendants Han and Yu, the statement and identification record of the victim Li, testimonies and identification records of the witnesses Feng and Liang, the on-site record and photos by the Public Security Bureau of a certain city, the forensic medical assessment of physical injury degree, the arrest process, the case solving process, demographic information, and other evidence. Defendants Han and Yu also made corresponding confessions in court regarding the above criminal facts.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xingbin District in a certain city charged that between June and July 2015, the defendants Wei and He, along with Wei's father, Wei A, collectively lent more than 50,000 yuan to the victim, Huang. Of this amount, Wei and He lent 40,000 yuan to Huang, and both parties verbally agreed on a monthly interest rate of 5% to 10% of the principal. After Huang paid Wei more than 5,000 yuan in interest for two months, he ceased further payments. Wei believed that he had been deceived by Huang and demanded the repayment of the principal, which Huang continuously failed to repay. On the night of October 12th that same year, around 9 PM, Wei A, Wei, He, and Huang met at the \"Fashion Milk Tea Shop\" in Xingbin District of a certain city to discuss the repayment. Wei and He demanded that Huang repay that night or find someone to guarantee the repayment, but Huang failed to meet their demands. Around 11 PM, Wei and He used a vehicle to take Huang to the edge of a sugarcane field in Qiaogong Street, Qiaogong Township, Xingbin District. During the journey, Wei used WeChat to call three men (one named Lao, one named A, and another unknown, who were dealt with in a separate case) to bring shovels by car. Wei, He, and others threatened Huang by pretending to dig a pit to bury him alive to force him to repay the loan or find a guarantor. Around 5 AM the next day, Wei and He again used a vehicle to take Huang to wait near the Laibin International Hotel to make him call someone to guarantee the payment. Around 9 AM that morning, Huang called his daughter, Wei B, to act as a guarantor. Wei B instructed Wei and He to go to the Binfeng Jiangnan Community in Xingbin District to complete the guarantee paperwork. Wei and He then drove Huang towards the Binfeng Jiangnan Community but were apprehended by police on Hongshui River Avenue. Regarding the alleged facts, the public prosecution agency presented documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, as well as confessions and defenses from the defendants in court.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that in the early hours of December 28, 2015, defendant Mei, together with Xu, smashed the car window glass using stones in the west area of Building 23, Lingfeng New Village, Baiguan Street, a certain district of a certain city. They stole from victim Wang Yib’s D××××× parked vehicle 4 cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes (soft pack), 5 packs of Hemtianxia cigarettes, 6 loose packs of Zhonghua brand soft pack cigarettes, and more than 30 yuan in coins. According to the appraisal, the value of the cigarettes is 3720 yuan. Further investigation found that after the incident, the public security organ seized 4 cartons of Zhonghua brand cigarettes, 4 packs of Hemtianxia brand cigarettes, 5 packs of Zhonghua brand soft pack cigarettes, 1 unsealed pack of Hemtianxia cigarettes (containing 9 cigarettes), and 1 unsealed pack of Zhonghua soft pack cigarettes (containing 6 cigarettes) from defendant Xu. The public security organ has returned the aforementioned seized items to the victim Wang Yib. The aforementioned facts, which defendants Mei and Xu did not dispute during the trial, are confirmed by the confessions and defenses of defendants Mei and Xu, the statement of the victim Wang Yib, the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia and Hu, the price appraisal opinion, the identification inspection report, the search record and photographs, the seizure decision, the seizure list and record, the identification record and photographs, the return list, receipt, surveillance video, the scene investigation and inspection record, the criminal judgment document, the account of the arrest, and the household registration information of defendants Mei and Xu, are sufficient to establish.", "label": {"Mei": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On a day in late October 2014, defendants Qian and Wang sold about 1 gram of methamphetamine to Sun and Zhang (both handled in separate cases) for 400 yuan at a certain building, certain room in Zemin Sunshine Community, in a certain district of a certain city. On another day in late October, defendants Qian and Wang sold about 1 gram of methamphetamine to Sun and Zhang for 400 yuan downstairs of a certain building in Zemin Sunshine Community, in a certain district of a certain city. On January 22, 2015, defendants Qian and Wang were arrested by police at Lishui Airport in a certain city. Police seized 0.8762 grams of methamphetamine in the Zhejiang BD8B** small sedan driven by defendant Qian. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution presented to the court the testimonies of witnesses Zhang and Sun, identification records and photos, a seizure list and photos, search records, weighing and counting records and photos, a drug transfer list, the criminal judgment, physico-chemical examination reports, arrest details, investigation reports, household registration proofs of the two defendants, and their confessions and defenses.", "label": {"Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that in the early hours of August 29, 2008, defendants Hu and Zhang rode a motorcycle from a certain county in a certain province to a certain road (opposite Chengguan Police Station). Using methods such as prying open doors and cutting the ignition wire, they stole a Dongfeng EQ3108G6D1 truck parked by victim Wang at this location. They later drove the vehicle to a village in a town of a certain city and sold it to a scrap dealership for 17,000 yuan. According to the appraisal by Nan Zhang County Pricing Bureau, the value of the stolen Dongfeng EQ3108G6D1 truck was 36,300 yuan. On June 8, 2016, Hu turned himself in at the Nan Zhang County Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed his crimes. It was also found that after being brought to justice, Zhang compensated victim Wang with 23,000 yuan, and Wang expressed forgiveness toward Zhang. These facts were not disputed by defendants Hu and Zhang during the court proceedings and were supported by the statement of victim Wang, the criminal case registration form, police dispatch registration form, incident report, apprehension report, arrest report, motor vehicle information query results, vehicle registration certificate, vehicle sales invoice, onsite photo identification, criminal judgment from a certain county's people’s court, onsite identification photos, residential information form and other documentary evidence, identification transcripts, price assessment certification conclusion from Nan Zhang County Pricing Bureau's Price Certification Center, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Hu and Zhang, which are sufficient to establish the findings.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial found that in early March 2013, the defendant Shi approached the defendant Zhao and requested to use Zhao's team of large trailers and his own car, a BMW with the license plate number Y×××××, to stage a fake accident scene and defraud the insurance company of insurance money. After Zhao agreed, he found the defendant You and asked him to falsely report the insurance after the fake accident scene was created using You's driver's license. On the evening of March 10, 2013, at around 23:00, Shi drove his BMW car to create a fake accident scene with Zhao's large trailer with the license plate number Ji F××××× at the intersection of South Second Ring Road and Lianchi South Street in Baoding City. Subsequently, Shi and Zhao used You's driver's license to falsely report the insurance accident. China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. accepted the case, and during the claims process, Shi and Zhao made You use his identity to apply for a China Construction Bank card for Shi to withdraw the claim funds. Later, Shi withdrew the fraudulent claim amount of 27,000 yuan using this card. After the case was solved, the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victimized unit. It was also found that You and Zhao surrendered to the public security bureau separately on January 29, 2015, and February 11, 2015. The facts stated above were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and they expressed their willingness to plead guilty. Furthermore, these facts are corroborated by the confessions of the three defendants, the testimony of witness Sun, the identification records, the arrest process, household registration certificates, the compensation case files, employment contracts, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm the conviction.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "You": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that in May 2015, the defendant Wang, without going through normal channels, purchased a large quantity of \"Xiaoyi Music\" CDs and DVDs and wholesale parts of them to the defendant Huo and Zhang. After the incident, the police seized 4,570 discs from Wang, 746 discs from Huo, and 372 discs from Zhang. According to the appraisal by the Hebei Province Printed Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Station, 4,444 discs seized from Wang were illegal publications, 726 discs seized from Huo were illegal publications, and 361 discs seized from Zhang were illegal publications. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by the two defendants during the trial and are fully substantiated by witness testimonies, case reports, lists and photos of seized items, and publication appraisals.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huo": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on December 2, 2016, at around 22:00, defendants Li and Tang consumed drugs in a house located in a certain building, in a certain district of a certain city. During this time, Li received a call from Peng, who was looking to purchase drugs. Li then arranged for Tang to deliver the drugs to Peng at a hotel room located in a certain district of a certain city at xx Lu xx Cheng xx Hotel xx Room. Despite knowing it was drugs, Tang followed Li's arrangement and carried two tablets with a net weight of 0.1955 grams suspected to be methamphetamine (commonly known as \"magu\") and 0.2740 grams suspected to be methamphetamine (ice) to the agreed trading location, completing the transaction for 200 yuan. After the transaction, Peng and Tang were caught on the spot by police officers. The police seized 200 yuan of drug money from Tang and the aforementioned suspected drugs from Peng. The drugs involved, the drug money, and two mobile phones used as crime tools were lawfully confiscated by the public security authorities. According to the municipal public security bureau drug testing center, methamphetamine components were detected in the seized suspected methamphetamine, and methamphetamine and caffeine components were detected in the seized suspected methamphetamine tablets. On the same day, defendant Tang led police officers to arrest Li near the district’s maternal and child health hospital. After arriving at the case, both defendants Li and Tang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. At the trial, both defendants Li and Tang had no objections to the above-mentioned facts, which were presented in court and verified by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, case filing decision, household information, arrest process, search records, call records, weighing records, identification records, photos, appraisal documents, video materials, a list of seized items, witness Peng's testimony, and the confessions of defendants Li and Tang, all of which were confirmed and are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Tinghu District, a certain city, charges that the defendants, Lei, Wan, Chen, and Wu, are all members of the \"Xue xx\" pyramid scheme organization. They reside with other organization members, Zhu, Cui, Ma xx, Zhu xx, and Wang xx, in the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city, with defendant Lei in charge of this location. On March 14, 2015, defendant Wan lured the victim, Zhao, to the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city to develop an offline. Subsequently, the defendants Lei, Wan, Chen, Wu, and others indoctrinated the victim Zhao with content related to the pyramid scheme. Zhao realized the intentions of Lei, Wan, Chen, Wu, and others, and escaped from the location on March 28, 2015. However, after being discovered and brought back by defendant Lei, Lei instructed defendants Wan, Chen, and Wu to keep a close watch on victim Zhao and added a padlock to the entrance door of the pyramid scheme location at night to prevent Zhao from escaping again. \n\nOn the afternoon of April 2, 2015, victim Zhao seized the opportunity to escape again from the pyramid scheme location at the dormitory of the timber factory in a certain city to the train station in a certain city. Defendants Wu and members Zhu and Cui noticed and began searching. Defendant Wan learned of this and went to the train station with Zhu. Wan grabbed victim Zhao while Zhu took Zhao's bag to prevent her from leaving.", "label": {"Lei": ["Imprisonment"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that: At around 10 PM on May 7, 2016, the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang were having dinner at the Chuanmin Fish Restaurant in Zhengding New District when they got into a dispute with the victim Yang and others. A fight ensued, during which the four defendants injured the victim Yang. The injuries sustained by the victim Yang were assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, the defendants Li and Kang, along with the relatives of the defendants Liang and Guo, compensated the victim for the losses, and the victim expressed understanding towards the four defendants. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang during the trial, and were confirmed by the statements and defenses of the defendants Guo, Liang, Li, and Kang, the statement of the victim Yang, the testimonies of witnesses Yang, Zhang, and others, the forensic medical report on the degree of bodily injury, surveillance video, letter of understanding, identification documents, and other evidence materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Guo": [], "Li": [], "Kang": []}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that on the afternoon of August 28, 2015, the defendants Sun and Tang went to the home of the victim Feng in Group 2, Zhigou Village, a town in this county. Taking advantage of the absence of the Feng family, they used a key to unlock the door and entered Feng's home, stealing 8,000 yuan. After the incident, the 8,000 yuan stolen from victim Feng was seized by the public security authorities and returned to the victim. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Sun and Tang during the trial, and were corroborated by the statement of victim Feng, testimony of witness Xu, documents from the Guannan County Public Security Bureau detailing the case-solving process, arrest process, search records, list of seized and returned items, photographs of the crime scene, household registration evidence, and the administrative penalty decision from the Guannan County Public Security Bureau, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: Accomplice Huang A (handled in a separate case), due to dissatisfaction with the victim Yu associating with his ex-girlfriend, gathered the defendants Luo and Wu to plan to teach the victim Yu a lesson. On the evening of October 18, 2013, accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu intercepted victim Yu at the entrance of the Wen Chuan Club on Guangxin Road in the district, and jointly used fists and feet to assault victim Yu, causing him minor injuries. On October 19 and 31, 2013, defendants Luo and Wu subsequently voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the case occurred, under the mediation of the public security authorities, accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu jointly paid a compensation amount of 85,000 yuan to victim Yu. Both parties reached a criminal and civil reconciliation regarding the case, and victim Yu and his family expressed in writing their understanding of the criminal actions of accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu, and requested the judicial authorities to show leniency on accomplice Huang A and defendants Luo and Wu. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Luo and Wu during the trial, and were substantiated by evidence provided by the prosecution, including confessions and identification records of defendants Luo, Wu, and accomplice Huang A, statements and identification records of victim Yu, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Gao, and Yang, forensic examination injury assessment report, the two defendants identifying the crime scene and photographs, criminal case acceptance and filing forms and crime-solving report, account of the capture process, the two defendants’ household registration materials, the compensation receipt, and the reconciliation agreement document.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention"], "Wu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from mid-August 2017 to October 7 of the same year, the defendant Lin allowed She to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) seven times in his rented jade shop at Unit C14, Phase 1, Jewelry Plaza, Pandong Street, Industrial Park, a certain city. From September 3, 2017, to October 4 of the same year, the defendant She allowed Lin to use methamphetamine four times in his residence at Room 501, Building H, Qiaonan Teacher's Building, Pandong Street, Industrial Park, a certain city, and in a garage rented beneath the Teacher's Building. Regarding these facts, both defendants Lin and She raised no objections during the court hearing, and there is corroborating evidence, including testimonies from witnesses Li and She, household registration certificates, materials of identification and recognition, inspection records, lists of seized/recovered items, witness certificates, rental agreements, administrative penalty decisions, on-site testing reports, on-site investigation materials, proof documents, case registration forms, arrest records, and explanatory notes from the public security organs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts of the case.", "label": {"Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "She": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on a day at the end of April 2016, the defendants Xiong, Liu, and Xiong drove to a certain town in a certain county to buy trees. While passing Yin's nursery, defendant Xiong instructed Xiong to stop the car and informed Xiong and Liu that there were boxwood trees in the nursery, suggesting that they return later to take some home. After dark, defendant Xiong followed a vehicle transporting purchased trees to a location where defendants Liu and Xiong stole six boxwood trees from Yin's nursery, which were then split evenly between them. An assessment determined the value of the six boxwood trees to be 14,100 yuan. It was further determined that after the incident, the six stolen boxwood trees were recovered, but three had died, and the other three were returned to the victim, with their survival status currently unknown. During the trial, the three defendants compensated the victim for all economic losses and obtained the victim's understanding. The three defendants raised no objections to the aforementioned facts. Liu's defense lawyer argued that after Liu was brought to justice, he demonstrated a good attitude towards admitting guilt, was a first-time and incidental offender, actively paid compensation and fines, and requested leniency and a suspended sentence for Liu. The aforementioned facts are verified by evidence such as the registration form for case acceptance, the decision to file a case, the process of detecting and solving the case, household registration certificates, proof of no prior convictions, lists of seized items, on-site investigation records and photos, identification records and photos, the appraisal opinion from the certain county price authentication center, testimonies from witnesses Huang, Sun, Chen, Liu1, Liu2, and Wang, the statement of victim Yin, and the confessions and defenses of defendants Liu and Xiong, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shanghai accused Wu and Chu that at around 21:00 on June 12, 2020, the defendants together stole a Yadea brand electric bicycle parked by the victim Tao at a non-motorized vehicle parking area about 50 meters south near the east side of Liuzhou Road and Pubei Road in a certain district of this city and fled. According to the appraisal, the stolen electric bicycle was valued at 2,521 RMB. On June 17, 2020, Wu and Chu were apprehended by the police, and after being brought to justice, they truthfully confessed the above criminal facts, and the stolen goods have been recovered. The prosecution recognizes that the defendants' actions have violated Article x and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and they should be held criminally responsible for joint crimes of x. Wu and Chu have confessed, admitted guilt, and accepted punishment, so they can be leniently punished according to the law. It is suggested that each be sentenced to four months of detention and fined. The case is submitted for lawful trial. Defendants Wu and Chu and their defenders have no objections to the criminal facts, evidence, charges, and sentencing recommendations in the indictment. Wu and Chu have confessed, admitted guilt, signed the documents, and expressed no objections during the trial process.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location accused and charged as follows: 1. From June to August 2014, the defendant Huang, in order to demand the payment of the project funds owed by the Guangling Economic Development Zone Management Committee of Yangzhou City to Yangzhou Huafeng Investment Co., sought to obtain benefits for himself. He hired the defendant Xie for a payment of 10,000 RMB, using methods such as tracking, covertly photographing, and installing a GPS tracker on the victim's car, to illegally obtain personal information about Qi, the head of the Guangling District Industrial Park Management Committee of Yangzhou City. Huang attempted to obtain unfavorable information about the victim Qi to coerce him into agreeing to repay the debt. 2. From July to August 2014, the defendant Huang, in order to demand the payment of the project funds owed by a certain city's Tianping Investment Development Co. to Century Huafeng Holdings Co., sought to obtain benefits for himself. He privately hired the defendant Xie, using methods such as searching, tracking, and staking out, to illegally obtain the personal whereabouts and other information about Hua, the chairman of the city's Tianping Investment Development Co., and paid Xie 20,000 RMB. Based on the illegally obtained information by Xie, Huang and four others controlled the victim Hua on Songsong Road in a certain district of the city, forcing him to repay a debt of 180,000 RMB. On August 12, 2014, the defendant Xie, due to suspicious behavior, truthfully confessed the criminal facts to the public security organs during their investigation. After being brought to justice, Huang also truthfully confessed the criminal facts to the public security organs. To prove the facts of the above accusations, the public prosecutor interrogated the defendants Huang and Xie in court, read the records of the defendants' confessions during the investigation, the statements of the victims Qi and Hua, the testimony of the witness Bei, the civil mediation document from the Jiangsu Provincial Higher People's Court, the identification records and photographs, physical evidence photographs, site inspection records, site orientation diagram, site photographs, and the incident process, among other evidence.", "label": {"Huang": [], "Xie": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: From September 2013 to early July 2014, defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong engaged in illegal pyramid schemes at Room XXX, Building X, No. X, XXX Road, Xiangcheng District, Zhangzhou City. Among them, defendants Zhang and Yang served as the \"managers\" of this pyramid scheme site, while defendants Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong were salespeople. Subsequently, Peng, on July 30, 2014, Liu (the second) on August 1, 2014, and Ou on August 4, 2014, were deceived into being brought to this pyramid scheme site. To force Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou to join the illegal pyramid scheme organization, under the directive of the site director \"Zhou\" (handled in another case), defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong used methods like locking doors and taking turns guarding (including defendants Tan and Zhong who also acted as lookouts) to detain Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou within the pyramid scheme site. On August 4, 2014, the public security authorities raided the pyramid scheme site and rescued victims Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou. The evidence for the above-mentioned facts includes: 1. Relevant physical and documentary evidence; 2. Testimonies of witnesses such as Lin; 3. Statements from victims Peng, Liu (the second), and Ou; 4. Confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang, Yang, Xu, Deng, Tan, and Zhong; 5. Records of inspection and examination.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at approximately 21:00 on March 21, 2013, a drug buyer named Yang contacted the defendant Lai by phone to purchase methamphetamine worth 400 RMB. They agreed to meet near the Kaiping Market in the 50th district of Baocheng, Baoan District for the transaction. Subsequently, defendants Lai and Xiao went to the agreed location to meet Yang. Lai arranged for Xiao to receive 400 RMB from Yang and handed over a small packet of drugs. After the transaction was completed, the police arrested them on the spot, confiscating 400 RMB from Lai and a small packet containing a suspected drug (weighing 0.48 grams, from which methamphetamine was detected) from Yang. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Lai and Xiao during the trial and were confirmed by relevant evidence presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that: 1. On August 27, 2015, at around 19:00, the defendant Gu sold a packet of ketamine (commonly known as \"K powder\") to Chen at the Oubei Pier, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County, for the price of 200 yuan. 2. On August 29, 2015, at around 15:00, Chen contacted the defendant Gu by phone to purchase ketamine. Gu stated that he had none and asked Chen to directly contact the defendant Teng. Subsequently, Chen contacted the defendant Teng to purchase ketamine. On the same day, at around 16:00, the defendant Teng sold a packet of ketamine to Chen for the price of 300 yuan at the intersection of Yongning Road, Jiangbei Street, Yongjia County. After the transaction, the defendant Teng was caught on the spot by the police. The police seized from his handbag nine packets of suspected ketamine, a mobile phone, and 300 yuan in cash, of which the 300 yuan was returned to Chen. The police extracted one packet of suspected ketamine used in the transaction from the left pocket of Chen's pants. Upon examination, the ten packets of suspected ketamine seized weighed a total of 18.63 grams, all containing ketamine. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by the defendants Teng and Gu during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Chen, the seizure list, the on-site weighing records of the suspected drugs, the drug handover list, phone call records, the administrative penalty decision, the criminal judgment, the physical and chemical examination report, the on-site test report, the witness Chen's identification record, inspection record, on-site extraction record, urine extraction record, the procedures and explanations provided by the police for the arrest, and demographic information, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Teng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District in a certain city charges: On May 8, 2016, at 21:30, the defendants Lu and Liu, after consuming alcohol, went to the section of the road in front of Hengrui Pharmaceutical Factory on Renmin East Road in Haizhou District. They intercepted a patrol car from the Special Patrol Unit of the Haizhou Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city, with police number Su G11**, and unreasonably pulled at the on-duty police officer Guo. This caused Guo's police uniform to tear, injured his hand, and caused the loss of his single police equipment. Despite multiple warnings, the on-duty police officer Guo fired three warning shots into the air. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Lu and Liu during the court hearing. The case is supported by documentary evidence such as the case investigation report, arrest report, household registration proof, injury photographs, written testimonies from non-appearing witnesses Yin, Hu, Guo, and others, as well as pre-trial confessions and defenses from the defendants Lu and Liu. Additionally, a forensic assessment of the degree of human injury, numbered (Clinical) [2016] 0578, issued by the Physical Evidence Appraisal Institute of the city's Public Security Bureau, and audio-visual materials were presented and cross-examined in court, all of which sufficiently confirm the charges.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution accuses the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang of the following: 1. On the evening of January 16, 2015, the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang, together with Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan (both handled in separate cases), engaged in fraudulent gambling by cheating at the Renbo Supermarket on the second floor of New Century Mall in the Taizhou Economic Development Zone, defrauding the victim Yang out of 19,400 yuan. Later, Chen and Jiang each received 1,000 yuan of the stolen money, Luo received 900 yuan, and Wang received 700 yuan. The remaining amount was spent jointly by the defendants. 2. On the evening of the 18th of the same month, the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang, together with Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan, again engaged in fraudulent gambling in room 8818 of the Shenlan Concept Hotel in the Taizhou Economic Development Zone, defrauding the victim Yang out of 22,400 yuan. Later, Chen received 2,000 yuan of the stolen money, Jiang received 1,500 yuan, and Luo and Wang each received 1,000 yuan. The remaining money was used for joint consumption. On May 7, 2015, the victim reported the case; on the 18th of the same month, the defendant Jiang was apprehended by public security officers at the entrance of 1314 Bar in Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City. On the 21st of the same month, defendants Chen and Wang voluntarily surrendered at the Xipai Police Station of the Development Zone Branch of the Taizhou City Public Security Bureau, and on the 29th of the same month, defendant Luo surrendered at the same police station. During the investigation stage, all defendants compensated the victim Yang with 41,800 yuan, obtaining the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen, Jiang, Luo, and Wang during the trial process, and there is evidence such as household registration certificates, hotel accommodation query forms, the victim Yang's statements, confessions of co-offenders Ban XX and Ban Zhanzhan, identification records, case documentation, explanatory notes, criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, receipts, and letters of understanding, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Luo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On December 12, 2015, defendant Liao was beaten by the victim Guo A due to another person's dispute. Liao became increasingly angry afterwards and called defendant Wu (nicknamed \"Skinny\") that evening to ask for help in teaching Guo A a lesson. Later, Liao A (who is wanted and on the run) learned that Guo A was causing trouble and fighting at his animation arcade. Around 8 PM that evening, Liao A led Wu and others to a certain ridge, where they, under Liao's identification, chased and beat Guo A, eventually injuring him with a knife near the Tongyuan railway crossing. According to the appraisal, Guo A sustained minor injuries of the first degree. The evidence the prosecution used to establish the above facts includes: 1. Documentary evidence; 2. Appraisal opinions; 3. Identification records; 4. Testimonies from witnesses Zou A, Zou B, Zhang, Zou C, Li, and Wang; 5. Statement of the victim Guo A; 6. Confessions and defenses of defendants Liao and Wu.", "label": {"Liao": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On May 8, 2014, at approximately 14:00, the defendant Liu, in collusion with Xu, after prior planning, stole a \"Lvsu\" brand Electric King model anti-theft electric bicycle belonging to the victim, Zhou, valued at 2064 yuan (according to an appraisal), parked under Building 4, Unit 1, in the eastern district of a residential complex in a certain district of this city. Xu was responsible for acting as a lookout, while Liu stole the vehicle. When the two were moving the vehicle near the south gate of the complex, they were discovered by Zhou, who then captured Liu and handed him over to the police who arrived in response to the report. On May 28, 2014, defendant Xu was apprehended by the public security organs. After being brought to justice, both defendants truthfully confessed the facts of the case. During the trial, defendants Liu and Xu raised no objections to the above facts, which were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Zhou, the identification transcript, the list of seized and returned items, the location map of the crime scene, the photographed identification of the crime scene, audiovisual materials, and evidence provided by the public security organs including the household registration information, prior records, arrest process of defendants Liu and Xu, medical records, and inspection reports, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: 1. On the morning of March 24, 2014, defendant Lv, knowing that the \"Apple\" laptop (valued at 7,140 RMB as per appraisal) belonging to Li (already sentenced) was stolen, still sold the \"Apple\" laptop on behalf of defendant Jin for 2,300 RMB. Defendant Jin, knowing the \"Apple\" laptop from defendant Lv was stolen property, still purchased it at a price significantly below market value without legal registration and resold the laptop at a higher price to another person. 2. On a night in late March 2014, defendant Lv, knowing that the \"Apple 5s\" phone belonging to Li was stolen, still sold the \"Apple 5s\" phone on behalf of defendant Jin for 1,500 RMB. Defendant Jin, knowing the \"Apple 5s\" phone from defendant Lv was stolen property, still purchased it. The actions of defendants Lv and Jin have violated the provisions of Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of x. It is requested to impose a lawful sentence. Additionally, it was found that after the incident, the relatives of defendants Lv and Jin compensated the victim Chen for the economic loss of the \"Apple\" laptop, totaling 7,140 RMB, on July 6, 2014, and obtained forgiveness from the victim who requested leniency in sentencing. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Lv and Jin during the court trial, and the following evidence was provided by the prosecution and substantiated during the trial: 1. Household registration certificates; 2. Statements of defendants Lv and Jin; 3. Statement of victim Chen; 4. Testimony of witness Li; 5. Price appraisal conclusion document Lianjia Ren (2014) No. 46; 6. Business license; 7. Sales receipt; 8. Announcement; 9. Arrest record; 10. Letter of understanding; 11. Phone call records; 12. Criminal judgment, etc., proving the evidence is indeed sufficient and adequate to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lv": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After a trial, it was found: In June 2015, near the Xingtang Agricultural Market in the Economic Development Zone of a certain county, the defendants Zhao and Guo together used a method of prying open locks to steal a total of three electric tricycles. The specifics are as follows: 1. On June 10, 2015, at approximately 9 a.m., on the east side of the entrance to the Fuyang Hualian Supermarket in Xingtang, Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo acted as a lookout while Zhao pried open a lock and stole Huang's red electric tricycle of the Wanshunfu brand. The stolen vehicle was valued at 4,200 yuan. 2. On June 19, 2015, at approximately 9 a.m., on the west side of the entrance to the Xingtang Agricultural Market in the Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo was on guard nearby, while Zhao pried open a lock and stole Chen's blue electric tricycle of the Zhanyun brand. According to the appraisal by the Price Appraisal Center of a certain county, the stolen vehicle was valued at 3,255 yuan. 3. In early June 2015, at the entrance of Fuyang Hualian Supermarket in Xingtang, Economic Development Zone of a certain county, Guo acted as a lookout while Zhao pried open a lock and stole a dark blue electric tricycle belonging to a man about 50 years old. In summary, the defendants Zhao and Guo committed 3 thefts, with the stolen items that could be appraised valued at 7,090 yuan. One theft could not be appraised due to the lack of physical evidence. The above facts had no objection from the two defendants during the court hearing, and were confirmed by evidence including photographs of the crime tools, photos of the stolen electric vehicles, documentary evidence such as the case registration form, decision to file a case, course of the case, household registration certificates, proof of prior convictions, testimony of witness Gao, statements of victims Chen and Huang, records of on-site investigation, search, and identification, the appraisal conclusions from the Price Appraisal Center of a certain county, and video materials.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that on the night of February 4, 2016, the defendants Chen and He, after premeditation, went to the Dongran School South Mobile Station at Zhangwang Village, Baiyangwan Street, Gusu District, Suzhou City. There, using tools such as hammers and screwdrivers to pry locks, they stole two Nandu brand lithium iron batteries worth 8,100 RMB from the station cabinet. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victimized unit by the public security organs.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "He": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At the end of 2012, the defendant Han sold 8 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to the defendant Wang in three transactions at a price of 400 yuan per gram in a county town. Later, Han and Wang jointly sold 0.5 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to another person at a price of 400 yuan per gram near the county's trade center. On a day at the end of 2012, the defendant Wang sold 0.2 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to a drug user named Xiang near the Sheng Nuo Li Du Hotel in the county. To prove the above facts, the prosecution has provided supporting evidence.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that the defendant Chen discovered an improper relationship between the defendant Huang and the victim Ren. Chen then conspired with the defendant Huang and Zhang (handled in a separate case) to find an opportunity to lure the victim Ren out and beat him up. On October 5, 2015, at approximately 11 a.m., the defendant Huang, under the pretense of a date, tricked the victim Ren into room 501 of the Urban Hotel on Riverside Road, Lingxi Town, a certain county. The defendant Chen and Zhang entered the room pretending to catch an affair and proceeded to beat the victim Ren, destroyed Ren’s iPhone 6, and extorted 30,000 yuan from him. They eventually obtained 8,000 yuan in cash from the victim Ren and coerced him into writing an IOU for 20,000 yuan. On October 6, 2015, the defendant Huang voluntarily surrendered to the public security bureau of a certain county. After the incident, the defendant Chen compensated the victim Ren for economic losses and received Ren's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Huang during the trial, and there is supporting evidence from the victim Ren's statement, forensic medical examination report of human injury degree, search record, inspection record, electronic data extraction record, identification record, seizure order, list of seized items and return receipt, text message photos, IOU, case facts, household registration certificate, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish these facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 0:00 on January 15, 2015, defendants Zhang and Lu had an altercation with victim He near the entrance of Bihai Hotel in Nanping Town, a certain city. Defendants Zhang and Lu used a switchblade to stab victim He in the abdomen, left side, and left chest. When defendants Zhang and Lu were chased to the entrance of Bihai Hotel by victims Zhong and others, defendant Zhang again used the switchblade to stab victim Zhong. Defendant Lu seized a steel pipe from Zhou and, together with defendant Zhang, assaulted victim Zhong. According to forensic identification, the injuries sustained by victims He and Zhong were both classified as second-degree serious injuries. On January 27, 2015, defendant Zhang was apprehended and subsequently assisted the police in capturing defendant Lu on the same day. It was also found that after being brought to justice, defendants Zhang and Lu reached a settlement agreement with victims He and Zhong regarding compensation. Defendant Zhang compensated victims He and Zhong with 90,000 RMB, and defendant Lu compensated them with 40,000 RMB, both of which were accepted by victims He and Zhong. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Lu during the trial, and were supported by the statements and identification records from victims He and Zhong, testimony from witnesses Zhou, Li, and Xiao, as well as identification records from witnesses Zhou and Li. Additionally, the arrest process, explanations of surrender, situation reports, forensic identification reports on the degree of injuries, criminal settlement agreements, criminal understanding documents, receipts, household registration information, scene photos, and audiovisual materials all provide sufficient evidence. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang presented the following arguments: 1. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhang truthfully confessed to the crime. 2. After being brought to justice, defendant Zhang assisted the police in capturing defendant Lu and demonstrated meritorious behavior. 3. There was fault on the part of the victim in this case. 4. Defendant Zhang actively compensated victims He and Zhong for economic losses and received their forgiveness. 4. Defendant Zhang is a first-time offender. In summary, it is suggested that this court impose a lenient punishment on defendant Zhang. Regarding whether there was fault on the part of the victim, upon investigation, this case was initiated by provocative language from defendant Zhang, and therefore, the victim should not be considered at fault.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: 1. At around 9 a.m. on July 4, 2013, the defendants Sun and Liu (handled in a separate case) rode a black Yamaha two-wheeled motorcycle to Liu Tai Group, a village in Longshan Township, Luoshan County, Xinyang City. At the home of the victim Li, they pretended to be electricians who needed to exchange smaller denominations of money for larger ones as a pretext to find out where Li kept his money. They then distracted Li by asking to boil water and stole 500 yuan in cash from Li's wardrobe, replacing it with fake money to avoid detection. 2. At around 8 a.m. on December 5, 2016, the defendants Sun and Liu rode a black Yamaha two-wheeled motorcycle to Xintang Group, Ershilipu, Longfeishan Subdistrict Office, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City. At the home of the victim Zhang, they used similar means to steal 2,000 yuan stored in the pocket of clothing inside Zhang's cabinet. During the trial, the relatives of the defendant Sun brought the Yamaha motorcycle, which was used as a tool in the crime, to the court and, together with the relatives of the defendant Liu, actively compensated the victims Li and Zhang for all their losses. The defendants Sun and Liu did not raise any objections during the court proceedings. There is evidence in the form of household registration information, proof of previous convictions, criminal judgments, arrest records, case files, receipt slips, video materials, physical evidence, witness testimony from Liu, and statements from the victims Zhang and Li, which sufficiently confirm the facts.", "label": {"Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found:\n\n1. Selling goods with counterfeit registered trademarks: In March 2019, defendants Zhang and Chen, knowing that the lubricating oil labeled \"Fuchs\" from defendant Qu was a counterfeit registered trademark product, still purchased 2.67 tons of this lubricating oil from defendant Qu and sold it to Guodian Northeast Power Co., Ltd. Shenxi Thermal Power Plant for 75,557.4 yuan. After the case was discovered, defendants Zhang and Chen were apprehended by the public security organs, and defendant Qu turned himself in to the police. After coming to the case, defendants Zhang and Qu truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts.\n\n2. Dangerous driving: At about 19:55 on June 1, 2018, defendant Zhang, after consuming alcohol, drove a small vehicle with the license plate number Su L××××× and was caught by the on-duty traffic police officers of the Jurong City Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade at the intersection of West Avenue, Huayang South Road, Jurong City. According to the Nanjing Kangning Judicial Appraisal Center, the ethanol content in defendant Zhang's blood was 137.48mg/100ml at the time of the incident. After coming to the case, defendant Zhang truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts.\n\nThere are no objections to the above facts from defendants Zhang, Chen, Qu, and their defenders Du and Wang during the court hearing. The facts are supported with the statements and defenses of the three defendants; testimonies of witnesses Li, Xu, Dong, Sun, and others; documentary evidence such as the basic information form of the population, police response work registration form, description of the apprehension process, invoice, seizure list, and criminal judgment; the inspection and testing report issued by Jiangsu Province Quality Supervision Inspection Institute, judicial appraisal opinion by Nanjing Kangning Judicial Appraisal Center; identification record, search record, electronic data inspection record, and related photographs. These are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charges that the defendant Zhao, a legal representative of Cangzhou Jie Chun Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., on April 15, 2019, knowingly signed a labor contract for an engineering project with the defendants Wu and Bai, who did not have the relevant qualifications for undertaking the dismantling of prefab steel buildings. Defendants Wu and Bai, knowing that the defendant Han did not have the relevant qualifications for undertaking the project, subcontracted the project to Han, signing a demolition project contract. Defendant Han, knowing that the workers had not undergone any safety training or obtained the necessary qualifications, led the workers to Hebei Ye's Glass Factory to begin dismantling the prefab steel house roofing and C-shaped steel. At approximately 9:50 am on May 9, worker Yang, while dismantling the prefab steel house roofing about 7 meters above the ground on the southeast side of Hebei Ye's Glass Factory, accidentally fell to his death. Han, Wu, Bai, and Zhao have now compensated the victim's family, who have expressed their forgiveness.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Bai": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: At around 2 a.m. on April 15, 2016, defendants Wang and Li, along with two women (both handled in separate cases), drove a three-wheeled motorcycle to the construction site of Jucheng Yijiang Building on Wenhua Avenue in the Daqiao New District. They parked the motorcycle outside the site’s perimeter wall. Defendant Wang acted as a lookout outside while defendant Li and the two women entered the site to steal templates, which they transported out and placed on the three-wheeled motorcycle. Subsequently, defendants Wang and Li were caught on the spot by patrolling police officers, and the stolen templates were recovered. According to the appraisal, 91 templates were stolen, valued at 4,732 RMB. The items were seized after the incident and have been returned.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on May 2, 2020, around 8 p.m., during the closed fishing season in the inland waters of this city, the defendants Zheng and Cheng used self-made electric fishing tools, including batteries and transformers, to illegally catch aquatic products at the river on the south side of Xigang Road in a certain town in a new district of the city. Defendant Zheng was responsible for electric fishing, while defendant Cheng was in charge of carrying the bucket with the fish. After the public security bureau of a certain district in Shanghai discovered the above clues, they arrested the two defendants at the scene and confiscated 3.308 kilograms of fish (which were released back into the wild). According to the identification by the East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, the fishing gear involved in the case was a net with a scoop shape using electric pulse assistance for fishing (a type of electric fishing), and the method of operation was electric fishing. After coming into custody, defendants Zheng and Cheng both truthfully confessed their criminal facts and voluntarily signed a \"Restocking and Release Work Record,\" purchasing fish fry for restocking and release.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Detention"], "Cheng": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it was found that: 1. One day in March 2014, defendant Jiang, during a special action to dismantle a livestock and poultry farm in a certain county, rented eight sows from defendant Wu and placed them in his pig farm for inspection by government staff, thereby defrauding the livestock disposal subsidy. Wu, knowing that Jiang intended to defraud the government subsidy, still transported the sows to Jiang's pig farm for inspection. Jiang defrauded 8,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, and Wu illegally gained 1,500 yuan. 2. In early March 2014, defendant Wu rented 11 sows to Hu Moujia (handled in a separate case) and placed them in the abandoned pig farm of Song Moumou in a village in a certain town, for inspection by government staff during a special action to dismantle livestock and poultry farms in a certain county, helping Hu Moujia defraud 11,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, with Wu illegally gaining 2,000 yuan. 3. In early March 2014, defendant Wu rented 13 sows to Zhong (handled in a separate case) and placed them in a pig farm in a certain village in a certain township, for inspection by government staff during a special action to dismantle livestock and poultry farms in a certain county, helping Zhong defraud 13,000 yuan in livestock disposal subsidies, with Wu illegally gaining 2,000 yuan. After the incident, defendants Wu and Jiang returned illegal gains of 5,500 yuan and 8,000 yuan respectively. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Jiang during the trial, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty, supported by documentary evidence such as identity certificates, the site survey and appraisal form of a pig farm in a certain county, shutdown and demolition acceptance forms, subsidy settlement forms, shutdown and demolition agreements, policy opinions on subsidies in a certain county, and advance payment invoices; as well as testimonies from witnesses Zhong, Hu Moujia, and Hu Mouyi, which are sufficient for the conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. In the early morning of a day in June 2012, defendants Li, Pan, along with Su A and Su B (both handled in separate cases), after premeditation, drove an electric tricycle and stole 500 kilograms of rebar valued at 2,050 yuan from the site of the Qianjiang Passage Section 8 construction project at Qinlian Village, a town in a certain district of a city. The rebar belonged to Hangzhou Changhong Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. 2. On June 12, 2012, at around 3 AM, defendants Li, Pan, along with Su A and Su B, after premeditation, drove an electric tricycle and stole 109 steel pipes each 114cm long, 47 steel pipes each 84cm long, and 14 steel pipes each 54cm long from the site of the Qianjiang Passage Section 8 construction project at Qinlian Village, a town in a certain district of a city. The total value of the stolen property was 2,788 yuan. In summary, defendants Li and Pan committed theft together twice, stealing property with a total value of 4,838 yuan. Defendant Li was apprehended by the Bagongshan Branch of a public security bureau in Huainan City, a certain province, on August 15, 2012, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned thefts after being brought to justice. Defendant Pan voluntarily surrendered to the Panji Police Station of the same public security bureau on September 17, 2012, and truthfully confessed to his main acts of theft. After the incident, 170 of the stolen steel pipes valued at 2,788 yuan (109 pipes each 114cm long, 47 pipes each 84cm long, and 14 pipes each 54cm long) were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. During the court hearing, defendants Li and Pan raised no objections to these facts, which were substantiated by the confession and defense of co-offender Su A, witness testimony from Yu, identification records, the list of seized and returned items, photographs, a price appraisal report, counting records, the course of the incident, the process of apprehension, the criminal judgment, release certificate, detention certificate, and proof of residence for defendants Li and Pan, among other evidence, providing sufficient grounds for determination.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges and the court has verified: Around 10 p.m. on May 15, 2013, Yang (already sentenced), Zhao (already sentenced), and others had an altercation with Lu, Yang, and others in the lobby of the Hyatt Hotel in Zizhen Town, a certain city. Afterwards, Yang and Wang (already sentenced) gathered Zhang (already sentenced), Zhao, and the defendants Song, Jiang, and others to go to room 308 on the third floor of the Hyatt Hotel in Zizhen Town. Yang carried a knife, while Zhang, Wang, Zhao, and the defendants Song, Jiang, and others used beer bottles to assault Yang, Zhang, and others who were singing in the room. During this time, Yang used the knife to stab Yang. According to a forensic assessment, the injuries sustained by Yang were classified as serious. On September 27, 2016, police officers from the Public Security Bureau of a certain city arrested the defendant Song at his home in Taojiatun Village, Duanlutou Town, a certain city. On April 25, 2017, the defendant Jiang voluntarily surrendered to the Public Security Bureau of a certain city. The defendants had no objection to the above facts during the trial process. Furthermore, the facts are substantiated by the statements of the victims Lu and Yang, the testimonies of Yang, Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Li, and Zhao, the incident report form, case acceptance form, case filing decision, on-site investigation record (additional investigation), location maps and on-site photos, identification record and photos, the criminal judgment No. 69 (2014) and No. 17 (2015) of a certain city's Intermediate People's Court, the historical residence proof of the two defendants, and the arrest proof and case acceptance process, which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Song": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on August 4, 2016, the defendant Lu, under the pretense of introducing a job opportunity, lured the victim, Ping, to a pyramid scheme location at Unit X, No. X, Shui Street residential building in this city. On August 7 of the same year, after the victim Ping realized that the organization was a pyramid scheme, he expressed his desire to leave. Under the arrangement of Hong (handled in a separate case), the defendants Wu, Lu, Wu, and another person Gao (handled in a separate case), in order to coerce the victim Ping into joining the pyramid scheme, confiscated his mobile phone, closely monitored him, and restricted his personal freedom for over ten days. At around 9 a.m. on August 18, 2016, the defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu were apprehended by the police. After being brought to justice, all three truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal acts. The defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu raised no objections to these facts during the trial. Additionally, the case records submitted by the prosecution, including the case acceptance registration form, circumstances of the capture, interrogation records of the defendants, inquiry records of the victim, photo identifications and records, on-site identification photos and records, and residence information forms of the defendants Wu, Lu, and Wu, are sufficient to support the findings.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Lu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Qinhuai District in a certain city charged that in August 2015, defendants Zhu, Hu, Xu, and others, in order to locate the victim Tang and demand a debt from him, arranged for someone to engage in a vehicle transaction with victim Tang after learning that Tang had posted information about selling a vehicle online. On August 2, 2015, around 3 p.m., when victim Tang completed the vehicle transaction and arrived near Zhongchi Road in a certain district of the city, defendants Zhu, Hu, Xu, and others who were waiting there forcibly took victim Tang into a car, blindfolded him, confiscated his mobile phone, and drove him to Shuoguo Farm in Maoling Street of a certain district in the city, where they assaulted him. The next day, around noon, defendants Hu and Xu took victim Tang from Shuoguo Farm to the Shuangtang Police Station of Qinhuai Branch of the Public Security Bureau in a certain city to discuss debt repayment. On June 14, 2019, defendants Zhu and Hu were arrested by the public security organs. On June 23, 2019, defendant Xu was arrested by the public security organs. After being brought to justice, defendants Zhu, Hu, and Xu truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhu, Hu, and Xu during the trial process, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Xia, Pan, Huang, Chen, Jiao, and others, as well as identification records, inspection reports, statements of situation, criminal photography, loan contracts, receipts, police reports, letters of commitment, criminal records, arrest process documentation, household registration materials, and other evidence, which provide sufficient confirmation.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 2008, the defendant Wang sold a batch of bamboo to Zhang. Zhang issued an IOU to Wang for the amount of RMB 6,050. In the following years, Wang repeatedly sought payment from Zhang, to no avail. Later, Wang discussed this matter with the defendant Yang, who suggested finding someone to help collect the debt. Wang indicated that if the debt was collected, he would only require RMB 4,050, with the remainder serving as a gratitude fee. On January 24, 2013, around 1 PM, Wang, Yang, along with Cheng (who is at large), Yang A (deceased), and others drove to Zhang's home in a certain town of a certain district, forcibly took Zhang into their vehicle and drove away. During the drive, Yang and others tied up and assaulted Zhang, forcing him to repay the debt. When the vehicle reached near Shijiatian in Jiujie Street, Xinzhou District, Wang and Yang got off and returned home, while Cheng and others took Zhang to a hotel in a certain city of a certain province for detention, continuing to pressure him for repayment. Later, Zhang contacted his friend Zhou by phone, who transferred RMB 10,000 into the bank account provided by Yang A and others. Around 6 PM on the same day, Zhang was released. Cheng later handed over RMB 4,050 in cash, part of the collected amount, to Wang. While in detention, Zhang was beaten and injured. Forensic examination identified Zhang's main injuries as facial skin and soft tissue contusions, categorized as minor injuries. On May 20 and ", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: On the evening of February 26, 2014, the defendants Jiang and Tan, along with Sun and Zheng (both handled in separate cases), went to a location opposite the gate of the XX community in a certain town, county. They successively stole a green Jiao brand electric bicycle belonging to Bao, a black Emporer Leopard brand electric bicycle belonging to Liu, a Philip electric bicycle belonging to Ma Jia, a silver-gray Emporer Leopard brand electric bicycle belonging to Ma Yi, and a Shanghai New Century brand electric bicycle belonging to another person, with a total value of 8,265 yuan. Later, defendant Jiang sold the Philip electric bicycle for 300 yuan to Zhu at the Weilin Bicycle Shop located at 103 Yaoxing Road, Ganyao Town of the same county. Additionally, it was found that after being brought to justice, the defendants Jiang and Tan confessed to their crimes truthfully. All the stolen vehicles were recovered, and four of them were returned to the victims. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Jiang and Tan during the court hearing. There are confessions and defenses from accomplices Sun and Zheng, statements from victims Bao, Liu, Ma Jia, and Ma Yi, inspection records, identification records, site survey records, evidence preservation orders, lists of returned items and documents, price appraisal conclusions, administrative penalty decisions, explanation of circumstances, arrest records, household registration certificates, and other evidence sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charges: On December 8, 2019, at around 12:00 PM, Xiao (handled in a separate case) was injured while working at a construction site of a certain middle school in a town of this city, contracted by the defendant Xu. That afternoon, in order to reduce his own medical expenses, the defendant Xu, along with the defendant Ye, who was the project manager of the construction, instigated Xiao to conceal the truth about the injury at the construction site when seeking treatment at Tai Xing City's Second People's Hospital. They fabricated the story that Xiao had fallen and was injured while on a ladder at home. Later, from December 8 to December 25, 2019, Xiao was hospitalized at Tai Xing City's Second People's Hospital, fraudulently claiming a total of 24,698.56 yuan from the medical insurance fund.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges: [1] From May 3 to 5, 2015, the defendant Sun defrauded victim Ren of 8,000 RMB on Yingkou Road, Century Avenue, in the Economic Development Zone, under the pretext of a car accident. [2] On the morning of May 8, 2015, defendants Sun and Chen, after prior discussion, falsely claimed that Sun had been arrested and needed money for bail. Chen approached victim Ren in front of the People's Procuratorate on Jingyang Road, Lvyuan District, and defrauded him of 5,000 RMB. [3] From May 25, 2015, to June 23, 2015, defendant Sun, under the pretext of his father's loan application, defrauded victim Ren of a total of 20,200 RMB at the Yingpu Street Construction Bank and Donghuan City Road Construction Bank in Erdao District. The evidence recognized by the prosecution includes the following: the confession and defense statements of defendant Sun, the confession of defendant Chen, the statement of victim Ren, the testimony of witness Wang, the case registration form and filing decision, the process of bringing the defendants to justice, identification records, transfer vouchers, the criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificate, statement of circumstances, the retail customer transaction list from the Bank of Communications, and the personal account and transaction details inquiry from the Construction Bank.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: Since 2002, the state began to issue reforestation subsidies to individuals who own reforested land. Starting in 2002, the Sihu Village Committee, after collective research, decided to fictitiously claim 61.5 acres of reforested land and the landowners in order to fraudulently obtain national reforestation subsidies. After Li assumed the position of the Party branch secretary of Sihu Village in 2005, he continued to handle the reforestation funds in this manner. In 2011, after Li communicated with and reached a consensus with the village committee director, Cheng, it was further decided after village committee research to again fictitiously create the owners of reforested land. The village secretary, Zhang, processed bankbooks for the fictitious landowners and reported them. Upon the arrival of the reforestation subsidies, with the consent of Li and Cheng, Zhang withdrew the subsidies for public expenditures. In 2015, 15,400 yuan of national reforestation subsidies were fraudulently claimed. After the incident was exposed, Li, Cheng, and Zhang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. In response to the above charges, the prosecution presented documentary evidence, witness testimony, defendants' confessions, and defenses in court.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: From April 2013 to about 20:00 on May 22, 2013, the defendants Zhang, Ji, and Su, after premeditation, took advantage of their night shifts at a certain plastic company on an island to steal 970 kilograms of raw silk from the company on two occasions. According to the valuation by the Laixi City Pricing Appraisal Center, the value amounted to 10,525 RMB. To substantiate the above facts, the prosecution has provided the court with evidence including the incident report, the case-solving process, witness testimonies, the valuation report of the items involved, relevant documents, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 1 PM on May 4, 2013, the defendants Cheng and Fang went to an alley near No. 26 Tianying East Road, Zhaozhai Village, a town in this city, and stole a Golden Lion brand three-wheeled motorcycle belonging to Zheng. The motorcycle was appraised at a value of 5,994 RMB. On May 22 of the same year, while Cheng and Fang were riding the motorcycle on the Xiaonanshan Road section of National Highway 104 in a town in this city, they were apprehended by the police, who discovered a pair of bolt cutters and a T-shaped wrench in the motorcycle. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Cheng and Fang during the trial process and were corroborated by the testimony of the victim Zheng, the appraisal conclusion, the search record, identification record, surveillance video, receipt, seizure list, arrest record, criminal judgment, and certificate of release after serving the sentence, as well as basic information of permanent residents, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Fang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Jilin Province charges: On February 29, 2020, at the Tian'er Vegetable Wholesale Market on Guangming Road in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a VIVO phone from Wang's pocket (valued at RMB 450 according to appraisal). On March 2, 2020, at the entrance of the Tian'er Vegetable Wholesale Market on Guangming Road in a certain city, defendant Liu stole an Apple phone from Feng's pocket (valued at RMB 3,000 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. On March 2, 2020, at the bus stop of the North Gate of a large market in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a Redmi phone from Du's pocket (valued at RMB 700 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. On March 19, 2020, around 14:50, at the bus stop of the North Gate of a large market in a certain city, defendants Liu and Xu, taking advantage of a moment of inattention, stole a backpack placed nearby, which contained RMB 4,700 in cash, an OPPO phone (valued at RMB 400 according to appraisal), ten packs each of Yunyan (Purple) and Zunyi cigarettes (valued at a total of RMB 130 according to appraisal), and three boxes of Paroxetine Hydrochloride medication (valued at a total of RMB 135 according to appraisal). On March 29, 2020, in the Northeast Specialty Wholesale Store at the entrance of Linjiang Market of Hongshi Forestry Bureau in a certain city, defendant Liu stole a VIVO phone from Zhao (valued at RMB 200 according to appraisal). This phone was recovered by the public security authorities and has been returned to the victim. In summary, defendant Liu committed five thefts, with a total value of stolen goods amounting to RMB 9,715, and defendant Xu committed theft with a value of RMB 5,365.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The defendants Yin and Sun voluntarily pleaded guilty, admitted the facts charged by the public prosecution, and were willing to accept punishment. The above facts were also not disputed by the defendants Yin and Sun during the court hearing, and were confirmed by the testimony records of witnesses Jiang, Liu, and Zou, identification records, WeChat transaction records, and the case report issued by the police officers of the Dongcheng Police Station, Jintan Branch, Changzhou Public Security Bureau.", "label": {"Yin": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that on the night of April 12, 2014, defendants He, Ge, Zhang and others were eating barbecue at a neighboring table to Jia and others at the Brothers Seafood Barbecue Restaurant in Xucheng Town, Xuyi County. During the meal, defendants He and Ge were loudly arguing and were reprimanded by Jia. Defendant Ge did not accept this and argued with Jia, while defendant Zhang comforted Jia to calm the dispute. Later, defendants He, Ge, and Zhang engaged in a show of force and aggression, resulting in a fight with Jia and others outside the restaurant, which led to Jia being injured. According to forensic identification, the degree of injury suffered by victim Jia is classified as minor injury of grade two. After the incident, defendants Ge and Zhang voluntarily turned themselves in. Additionally, during the trial process, defendants He, Ge, Zhang, and Jia reached a civil compensation agreement and carried out the compensation payment, and Jia expressed forgiveness to defendants He, Ge, and Zhang. The above facts were not contested by defendants He, Ge, and Zhang in court, and are supported by Jia's statements, testimonies from witnesses Tan, Sheng, Zhao, Chen, and others, the forensic identification report issued by Xuyi County Public Security Bureau, documentary evidence of defendants He and Zhang's prior records, the report on the apprehension of defendants He, Ge, and Zhang issued by Xuyi County Public Security Bureau, the civil compensation agreement and the letter of forgiveness, all of which adequately substantiate the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charged that defendant Li had an improper relationship with the victim, Li2. After learning this, defendant Wu was told by Li that she had been forced by Li2, to which Wu decided to confront Li2. After multiple unsuccessful attempts to contact Li2, Wu and Li climbed over the wall into Li2's home on March 29, 2017, and were taken away by the Shiqiao Police Station of the Linying County Public Security Bureau, later asking the station to resolve the matter. On April 1, 2017, Wu and Li went to the home of Li2's brother-in-law, Pan, to find Li2. Unable to locate him and getting into a physical altercation with Pan, they subsequently went to the Shiqiao Police Station to inquire about the matter's outcome. Since the station said they hadn't reached Li2, the two drove to Li2's home in another village to force him out, pushed on the front gate, finding it locked from the inside with no response. They went to a brick wall on the west side of Li2's house, which Wu then knocked over, allowing them to enter Li2's home. Unable to find Li2 in the house, Wu and Li went into the western side house where Li2 lived and had Li set it on fire. Li went to her car outside the courtyard to fetch a lighter, starting the fire from a bedsheet hanging from the bed in the western side house. The western side house was connected to the main house. After setting the fire, the two returned to their car, did not re-enter Li2's courtyard, allowed the fire to spread, and hindered local villagers' attempts to extinguish it. Li later called to report the fire. Police from Shiqiao Station first arrived on the scene and called 119 for the fire department. By the time firefighters extinguished the blaze, the fire had destroyed all items in the western side house where Li2 lived, burned the veranda of the main house, and spread to the main hall. An assessment determined that the burned house constituted a partial dangerous building, and the value of the destroyed items was 2,618 yuan.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region charges: In March 2012, the defendants Wu and Zhao partnered to negotiate with Lin, a villager from a certain place in a certain village, in a certain town of the county, to purchase Lin's contracted pine and miscellaneous woods (broad-leaved forest) located at a certain ridge in a certain village for 60,000 yuan for the purpose of logging. On March 24, 2012, defendant Wu signed an agreement with Lin. From November 15 to 26 of the same year, without obtaining a timber harvesting permit, defendants Wu and Zhao hired workers to cut down the broad-leaved miscellaneous forest. A field survey and mapping of the site of the illegal logging at a certain ridge in a certain village in a certain town of the county revealed that the area of deforested land was 25.1 acres, yielding 31.2269 cubic meters of timber, with a deforested timber volume of 93.4925 cubic meters. The facts found by this court are consistent with those charged by the prosecution. It was further found that defendants Wu and Zhao turned themselves in to the public security authorities on November 27, 2012, and September 5, 2013, respectively. Upon interrogation, the two defendants confessed to the crime of illegal deforestation. The village committee of a certain village in a certain township, where Zhao resided, provided a certificate confirming Zhao's consistent good behavior and expressed willingness to supervise him, requesting the court to impose a lenient sentence on Zhao. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wu and Zhao during the court hearing and are corroborated by documentary evidence, including the criminal case registration form, the decision to file a case, the forest land contract agreement, the tree purchase agreement, the forest rights certificate, the household registration certificate, the village committee's certificate, the arrival process and explanation, witness Lin's testimony, the statements of defendants Wu and Zhao, the site survey records and photos, site identification records and photos, the deforested timber volume investigation report, and an interrogation video disc, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges that from August 29, 2013, to September 29 of the same year, the defendants Deng and Gu were involved in stealing bicycles and electric bikes from Huang (Victim A), Wang, Feng, and Huang (Victim B) at various locations: a hotel's parking lot in a certain town in a certain district of the city, behind a children's clothing chain company in the Chen Heng Lou Industrial Zone of the same town, at Baojia No. xx, Shiqi Street, and at Building xx, Fenghuang New Village, Zhonghe Street. In total, four vehicles were stolen, valued at 3,226 RMB. After the thefts, the defendants sold the stolen goods from the first three thefts and used the proceeds. During the fourth theft, while cycling on the stolen bicycle, both defendants were apprehended by patrolling officers. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution presented to the court statements from the victims Huang (Victim A), Wang, Feng, and Huang (Victim B); testimony from witnesses Yu, Wu, and others; identification records and photographs; a pair of pliers as physical evidence, along with photographs; photos of the stolen bicycles; special receipts for temporarily seized items; a list of returned items; purchase invoices; a price assessment report; documentation of the police response; an explanation of circumstances; an investigation report; a criminal judgment; a public security administrative penalty decision; a labor reeducation decision; personal files of the reeducated individuals; identification documents of the defendants; and statements and defenses from the two defendants.", "label": {"Deng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that on September 18, 2012, defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu jointly invested in opening a certain bag shop on Hangzhou Road, first floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I. In the same month, defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu purchased a batch of handbags at a low price from others, which bore registered trademarks such as \"MONTBLANC,\" \"CHANEL,\" \"PRADA,\" \"SALVATORE FERRAGAMO,\" and \"BURBERRY,\" and sold them in the bag shop. They later stored the handbags in a warehouse on the fourth floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I. On May 10, 2013, the industrial and commercial department inspected a warehouse on the fourth floor of Haining China Leather City Phase I and seized 15 handbags with the \"MONTBLANC\" trademark, 39 handbags with the \"CHANEL\" trademark, 35 handbags with the \"PRADA\" trademark, 10 handbags with the \"BURBERRY\" trademark, and 8 handbags with the \"SALVATORE FERRAGAMO\" trademark on the spot. After an appraisal by the trademark registrants and their authorized agencies, all the aforementioned products were found to be counterfeit registered trademark goods, with a total value of more than 670,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou, Yang, and Gu during the trial and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Yu, Wang, and Ping; the on-site record by a certain city's Administration for Industry and Commerce; the decision documents of imposing compulsory measures; the list and photos of items; the list of accepted evidence materials, the decision documents and photos of seized items; the appraisal report; the trademark registration certificates and modification proofs, approval renewal proofs; the price appraisal report; the registration status of business entities; the capture process; explanatory notes, household registration certificates, and other evidences, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: 1. Between June 10 and 12, 2015, defendant Xia, at a specific address on Chenshu Street, a town in a certain district of a certain city, knowingly purchased dogs killed with darts containing succinylcholine chloride shot by a crossbow by defendant Dong and others involved in separate cases, including Shi and Chen, at a price of 3 yuan per jin, acquiring a total of 24 dogs weighing over 480 jin, with the intent to sell them for consumption, although they had not been sold yet. Among them, defendant Dong sold six dogs, weighing a total of 90 jin and priced at 270 yuan, acquired using the aforementioned method, to defendant Xia for consumption by others, although Xia had not yet paid for them. Between June 10 and 12, 2015, defendant Xia used a crossbow to shoot darts containing succinylcholine chloride in certain districts and other areas of a certain city to steal dogs, acquiring a total of 11 dogs with the intent to sell them for consumption, although they had not been sold yet. On June 12, 2015, the public security organ arrested defendants Xia and Dong and seized 35 dogs from Xia. After being brought to justice, defendants Xia and Dong truthfully confessed to their criminal activities. These facts were undisputed by defendants Xia and Dong during the trial and were sufficiently corroborated by the evidence submitted by the public prosecution, which includes documentation from Zhangjing Police Station, a division of the Xishan Branch of a city’s Public Security Bureau, such as the \"Procedure of Criminal Case Investigation\" and \"Situation Explanation,\" testimonies from witnesses Zhang, Yu, and Lu, statements and identification records of individuals involved in separate cases, Shi and Chen, including identification photos, communication records, on-site transcripts produced by the Xishan Branch of the Public Security Bureau, the evidence preservation decision, lists of preserved evidence, inventory of seized items, file lists, inventory of confiscated items, criminal photography, forensic reports issued by the Forensic Identification Office of Xishan Branch, \"Expert Opinion on Food Containing Cyanide or Succinylcholine Chloride,\" and confessions and identification records and photos of defendants Xia and Dong, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Xia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The local People's Procuratorate charges: In February 2020, defendant Li provided the Alipay account registered under the name of Guangxi Daiyu Aviation Technology Co., Ltd. (account: a87***@163.com) to a person with the WeChat name \"A Certain Someone\" (real identity currently untraceable) for funds transfer.“A Certain Someone” used Li's Alipay account to receive 213,037.1 yuan and transfer 212,916.8 yuan. Later, “A Certain Someone” found the process inconvenient and asked Li A to assist with the fund transfer operations. Li used his Alipay account to help “A Certain Someone” receive 6,708,775 yuan and transfer 6,703,403.88 yuan. Li also hired defendants Zhao, Su, and Cui to assist “A Certain Someone” with the transfers. Zhao used his own account to help receive and transfer 2,007,170 yuan each. Su used his own account to help receive and transfer 1,954,410 yuan each. Cui used his own account to help receive 964,950 yuan and transfer 964,910 yuan. Upon investigation, funds from fraud crimes were transferred through the accounts of Zhao, Su, and Li to other accounts. Li earned a profit of 12,200 yuan for assisting “A Certain Someone” with the transfer; Zhao earned 800 yuan, Su earned 400 yuan, and Cui earned 500 yuan. To substantiate the charges, the prosecution presented the confessions and defenses of defendants Li, Zhao, Su, and Cui, along with witness statements from Yang, Yang, and others, electronic data, household registration certificates, criminal record certificates, transfer records of Yang and Sun, transfer records of Li and the other three, deposit details, WeChat payment details, information on the arrest process, and case-solving process evidences.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and verification, it was determined: At around 1 a.m. on June 2, 2013, defendant Feng had an argument with Gao over trivial matters in a room on the fourth floor at No. 17 Antai Road, Anyang Street, in a certain city. Subsequently, Gao left the crime scene. Defendant Feng then gathered defendant Jin, and defendant Jin brought along Lin and Zhang (both handled separately) to the crime scene, and repeatedly called to find Gao. Later, defendant Feng, Jin, and others found Gao near the shop \"Dangjiaren Convenience Store\" on Anyang Street, Antai Road, brought him to a nearby alley, and assaulted him, causing injuries. The examination determined that victim Gao suffered fractures of the 12th right rib, fractures of the right transverse processes of vertebrae L1-4, and soft tissue injuries to both elbows, knees, and the left chest, with the injuries classified as minor. On June 17 and 18, 2013, defendants Feng and Jin voluntarily surrendered to the local Public Security Bureau. On August 19 of the same year, defendants Feng, Jin, and others mediated compensation for victim Gao's economic losses and received forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Feng and Jin during the court trial, and were confirmed by testimony from victim Gao, witness Lin, agreements, receipts, reports, statements of surrender, situational explanations, call records, forensic injury assessment, population information, among other evidence, sufficient for recognition.", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Hangzhou City charges that on October 13, 2012, at around 22:00, the defendant Li, due to an altercation between his girlfriend Wang and the taxi driver Song, in order to vent anger on behalf of his girlfriend, lured the victim Song to the entrance of a certain district's Jiangcun Garden Ruyi Court in this city. Defendant Li, along with defendant Gao, Huo (dealt with separately), and Zhu (dealt with separately), then gathered and assaulted the victim Song by punching, kicking, and hitting with rubber sticks, causing fractures to Song's medial orbital walls and the infraorbital wall of the left eye. According to the assessment, this constituted minor injury. On November 6, 2012, at around 22:00, defendant Gao, near the southern end of the path between buildings 10 and 33 in Jiangcun Garden Ruyi Court of this district, assaulted the victim Zheng by punching and kicking because Zheng had kicked his pet dog, resulting in a fracture of Zheng's left fibula. According to the assessment, this also constituted minor injury. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Gao and Li during the trial. Furthermore, the statements of the victims Song and Zheng, the testimonies of witnesses Wang, He, Mao, Yu, the confessions of co-defendants Huo and Zhu, along with the 110 police report records, household registration certificates, details of capture and case establishment, criminal record inquiry, administrative punishment decisions, statements of circumstances, scene investigation records and photos, identification records, forensic injury degree assessment certificates, and surveillance video discs, are presented as evidence, enough to ascertain the facts.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 14:00 on May 16, 2014, the defendants Wei and Zhu stole a Lvjia brand electric bicycle worth 3,200 RMB from the victim Huang on the roadside opposite the Wuhan Industrial and Commercial Administration Bureau on Hong Kong Road in Jianghan District of this city. The vehicle contained over 1,200 RMB in cash, shopping cards, an ID card, a backpack, and other items. On August 22 of the same year, at around 15:00, defendants Wei and Zhu went to the front of the Wuhan Library on Jianshe Avenue in Jianghan District of this city and stole a Rex brand bicycle worth 300 RMB from the victim Li. They were apprehended by public security personnel while escaping with the bicycle. The public security personnel also found on Zhu the stolen backpack and ID card belonging to victim Huang. The aforementioned backpack, ID card, and bicycle were returned to victims Huang and Li, respectively. The stolen items and cash from victim Huang have been squandered and lost. The defendants had no objections to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are supported by evidence including photographs of physical evidence, the arrest and case-solving process by the public security authority, basic information on permanent residents, criminal judgment documents, seizure orders, lists of seized and returned items, bicycle warranty cards, the testimonies of witnesses Lu and Wang, the statements of victims Huang and Li, and an appraisal of value opinion, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that in February 2012, Zhang A (deceased) used a gray Jiabao brand minivan as collateral to borrow 2,000 yuan from the defendant Zhang. Due to an inability to repay the debt, the vehicle was further sold to the defendant Zhao for 1,900 yuan. On January 28, 2014, the vehicle was seized by the Suning County Public Security Bureau and was identified as the vehicle stolen from Sun Moumou in a certain city on the night of February 10, 2012. It has since been returned, with an assessed value of 17,755 yuan. These facts are not contested by the defendants Zhang and Zhao during the court hearing. Additionally, there is evidence such as photographs of the involved minivan and the driving license, the victim Sun Moumou's statement, identification records, seizure and return inventories from Suning County Public Security Bureau, the appraisal conclusion from Suning County Price Certification Center, proof of residence, and information on the stolen vehicle, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that during December 2012 (lunar calendar), defendants Mao and Xiao, Nie, Xu, Li B, Li C (all already sentenced), along with Dong (handled in a separate case), conspired together for the purpose of profit. They set up a casino in the form of a \"small stake\" in a rented house in SanYang, ShanMa Village, Chengbei Street in this city, gathering people for gambling. Defendant Lian along with Ming, Wu, Li A, Xu (all already sentenced), and Wang (handled in a separate case) were hired to keep watch for the casino, with Defendant Lian participating for about ten days. The casino was in operation for about a month, gaining more than 100,000 RMB from rake-offs. On November 28, 2013, Defendant Mao voluntarily surrendered to the Wendou Police Station of Lichuan City Public Security Bureau in Hubei Province. On December 17 of the same year, Defendant Lian was apprehended by the public security organs in a certain village on Chengbei Street in this city. After returning to the case, both defendants truthfully confessed to the facts involved. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by Defendants Mao and Lian during the trial and were supported by the confessions of co-defendants Xiao, Nie, Xu, Li B, Wu, Ming, Li A, Xu, and Li C, as well as the testimonies of witnesses Yang and Tian, the household registration certificates of both defendants, the confession statements, arrest procedure testimonies, and criminal judgment documents of co-defendants, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges: On January 24, 2018, drug users Jin and Liu contacted the defendant Liu to purchase drugs. Since the defendant Liu knew that the defendant Tong had access to drug sources, Liu contacted the defendant Tong to purchase drugs. The defendant Tong informed the defendant Liu that he could buy drugs at a certain location. That afternoon, the defendants Liu, Tong, and Ge (handled in a separate case) met near the Hailai Local Cuisine Restaurant in a certain district of the city. The defendant Tong was responsible for driving them to the location to purchase drugs. During the trip, the defendant Tong provided his personal Alipay account to receive 500 yuan from Jin as payment for the drugs. After driving to a hospital at a certain location, the defendant Tong instructed Ge to get out of the car to purchase drugs from the supplier. The defendants Tong and Liu waited in the car. After Ge acquired the drugs, he first handed them to the defendant Tong, who then passed the drugs to the defendant Liu. The three then drove back to Pingyao. On the way, the defendant Liu got off the car at a certain district to sell two packets of methamphetamine (weighing about 0.68 grams) to Liu for 1,100 yuan. Later, the defendant Tong drove Liu to another district where, after getting out, the defendant Liu sold one packet of methamphetamine (weighing 0.34 grams) to Jin for 800 yuan. He was caught on the spot by the public security authorities. The evidence to support the charges includes physical evidence such as seized drugs (photographs), a list of seized items, witness testimonies, records of searches and identifications, drug inspection reports, discs, and the confessions and defenses of the defendants.", "label": {"Tong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendants Xue and Ji conspired to use forged vehicle purchase tax payment certificates to defraud car buyers of their money. On December 4, 2013, defendant Ji falsely claimed to Zhou during the process of registering a vehicle that cash could not be used for the vehicle purchase tax and that he would pay on behalf of Zhou using a bank card, thus defrauding Zhou of RMB 12,222 intended for the vehicle purchase tax. Subsequently, in the \"Guangming Advertising and Printing\" shop located opposite the Pizhou City Education Bureau, defendants Xue and Ji used forged blank \"Vehicle Purchase Tax Payment Certificates\" purchased from others and had Chen (handled in a separate case) fill out the certificate as proof of tax payment for a Foton vehicle purchased by Zhou. Ji then took the forged \"Vehicle Purchase Tax Payment Certificate\" with Zhou to the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau's Vehicle Management Office to process the relevant paperwork. That afternoon, Zhou returned to the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau's Vehicle Management Office to verify the status of the vehicle purchase tax payment and discovered the fraud. Zhou then contacted Ji by phone to come to the Vehicle Management Office, whereupon defendant Ji was summoned by the police of the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau. After paying Zhou's vehicle purchase tax, defendant Xue was inquiring about the situation at the Zhaodun Police Station of the Pizhou City Public Security Bureau when he was summoned by the police. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Xue and Ji during the trial. Furthermore, the evidence presented, including proof of the defendants' criminal responsibility age, the victim Zhou's statements, witness testimonies from individuals such as Chen, the forged vehicle purchase tax payment certificates and other physical evidence, identification records, the Pizhou City State Taxation Bureau's certifications, and accounts of the case's investigation and the defendants' apprehension, were sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Xue": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: On April 11, 2013, at around 11 a.m., the defendant Dai agreed with Wang over the phone to sell Wang a package of methamphetamine in the corridor of the third floor of the Guoli Hotel in the Luqiao District, Taizhou City, for 300 RMB. Subsequently, Dai and Wang separately instructed the defendants Yang and Zhou via phone to go to the Guoli Hotel to complete the transaction. Zhou was caught by police officers in Room 612 of the Jindi Hotel in the Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, handing over the package of drugs to Wang, and the package of drugs was seized on the spot. On the same day, at around 5 p.m., the defendant Dai agreed with Zhou over the phone to sell Zhou two packages of methamphetamine for 1000 RMB at the Hongjia Ceramic City in the Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City. Later, Dai instructed the defendant Yang via phone to complete the transaction with Zhou. At the end of the transaction, Yang was apprehended on the spot by police officers, and the two packages of drugs intended for the transaction were seized. On the same day, at around 11 p.m., Dai was arrested by police officers in the Jinxin Hotel in the Luqiao District, Taizhou City. According to identification, the three packages of drugs contained methamphetamine components, with a total net weight of 1.82 grams. The aforementioned facts, to which defendants Dai and Yang did not object during the trial, are sufficiently corroborated by the recognition records, testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Du, Li, and Wang, the public security administrative punishment decision, search records, seizure lists, drug handover lists, certain national mobile communication customer details, arrest process, situation explanations, household registration certificates, and physical evidence inspection reports.", "label": {"Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 11 a.m. on October 15, 2012, while the victims Cheng and Li (husband and wife) were negotiating a minor collision with another car owner in Alley 11, Buchang Village, District 73 of Baocheng, defendant Liang, suspect \"A\" (identity unknown, at large) and others gathered to watch. Victim Li noticed that Liang's electric scooter was blocking the front of his car, so he scolded Liang and the other onlookers. Suspect \"A\" then had a verbal altercation with victim Li, which escalated into a physical fight between the two. Seeing this, defendants Liang and Xu, along with suspect \"A\", used iron rods and car locks to beat victims Li and Cheng and smashed victim Li's car, a Yue BXXXXX Ruiji vehicle, resulting in damage. According to the assessment, victim Li sustained minor injuries, and the repair cost for the vehicle damage was 2,302 yuan. On November 26, 2012, defendants Liang and Xu were apprehended and brought to justice. Liang and Xu raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, which are corroborated by relevant evidence and sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location accused that during December 2018, the defendants Zhao and Han, knowing that the money they helped retrieve for a certain Weng (handled in a separate case) was the proceeds of a crime, still repeatedly assisted in quickly withdrawing the fraudulent funds from multiple banks in a certain town, county, and province, in order to earn a fee. Defendant Zhao alone or by arranging for defendant Han to withdraw a total of RMB 74,229.2, and defendant Han participated in withdrawing RMB 64,529.2. Defendants Han and Zhao were apprehended by the police on January 16 and 17, 2019, respectively, and they confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts truthfully after being brought to justice. To prove the charged criminal facts, the prosecution read or presented in court evidence including the victim's statements, relevant documentary evidence, the defendants' confessions, and defenses.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that at around 12 noon on March 14, 2014, defendants Qiu and Li conspired to go to the sock shaping workshop of the third phase of Langsha on Jiang Street, Yiwu City. They stole eight packages totaling 961 pairs of stockings from the workshop, valued at 5,285 RMB, and hid them behind the wall of the third phase of Langsha. Later, they threw the stolen socks over the wall into the neighboring Shunhui Zipper Factory, waiting for an opportunity to retrieve them. When the two attempted to enter Shunhui Zipper Factory to take the socks, they were refused by the factory's security guards, who reported the situation to the relevant person in charge at Langsha, Huang. Huang then retrieved seven packages of socks from Shunhui Zipper Factory, while defendant Qiu took one package from the factory. They were later apprehended by staff from the Yiwu City Public Security Bureau. The stolen goods have been recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The facts mentioned above are not disputed by defendants Qiu and Li during the trial. Additionally, the case is confirmed with the testimony of the victim Huang, testimonies from witnesses Wang and Gong, onsite identification records and photos, the case handover process, seizure orders, return list and photos, price evaluation report, the confessions of defendants Qiu and Li, and identity verification documentation, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on April 17, 2014, due to a debt dispute, the defendant Huang attempted to forcibly take away a GMC 6000CC business vehicle with the license plate Sichuan A×××××, which was actually owned by him but mortgaged to the victim Xu. At about 18:00 that day, the defendant Huang gathered the defendant Wang and others including Guo, Li, and Wu (all handled in separate cases) to the coal yard at Beiyanhe Water Tower Bridge Train Station in Henglin Town, a certain district of a certain city, where the victim Xu resided. The defendant Huang, in collusion with Wang and others, used methods such as hammer beating and tape binding to assault and control the victims Xu and Xia. They also instructed Guo and others to forcibly take away the GMC vehicle. To prevent the victims from calling the police, they threw an iPhone 4, a surveillance host, and a probe host, all property of the victim, into the river, causing a total loss valued at RMB 800. During this time, the personal freedom of victims Xu and Xia was illegally restricted for about 2 hours. According to forensic identification, the injuries of victim Xu were classified as minor injuries. It was further found that, after the incident, the family of defendant Huang compensated the victims for their economic losses and reached a settlement agreement. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang and Wang in court, and were corroborated by the statements of victims Xu and Xia, discharge records, outpatient medical records, promissory notes, mediation memos, testimony records of witnesses Li, Guo, Liu, and Ren, an arrest report and situation explanation from the police station in Guangde County, a certain province, basic information provided by the Chengdu Detention Center, and case report, arrest report, work records, forensic injury identification, and administrative penalty decision issued by the Public Security Bureau of a certain district of a certain city, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges that defendant Li, from early July 2015, was employed by a man nicknamed \"Fatty\" at a garbage compression station in a certain village of a city's certain district, responsible for dismembering and cleaning the dead and diseased pigs brought by \"Fatty,\" and then placing them in the freezer for freezing. \"Fatty\" would then sell the above-mentioned foods that did not meet safety standards. Defendant Zhang, from early August 2015, was employed by \"Fatty\" at an old house near the meteorological bureau in a similar village, tasked with processing the non-compliant pork and other items brought by \"Fatty\" into non-compliant sausages, cured meats, and the like, after which \"Fatty\" would sell these non-compliant products. The city's People's Procuratorate provided evidence such as seizure lists, test reports, case-solving processes, witness testimonies, and defendant confessions, alleging that the actions of defendants Li and Zhang violated the relevant article of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted a crime as specified by that article. The court is requested to render a verdict according to the law.\n\nDefendants Li and Zhang do not dispute the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution. The defense counsel for defendant Zhang argued: First, Zhang is a first-time offender and pleaded guilty with a good attitude, and in the joint crime, played the role of an accessory. Second, Zhang truthfully confessed to h", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution charges: On March 14, 2017, at approximately midnight, Zhao had a dispute with taxi driver Li over taking a taxi. When the taxi was driving to the entrance of a transition farmers' market on Xiwang Road in Xishan District of a certain city, Li got out of the car to call the police, and Zhao called Zhao. Police officer You from the Jinjiahe Police Station, accompanied by auxiliary police officer Zhou, arrived at the scene after responding to the call. Zhao, along with the defendants Lu and Chen, also arrived at the scene. Defendant Lu knocked off police officer You's law enforcement recorder. Later, reinforcement police officer Li, along with auxiliary police officer Zhou, arrived at the scene. Defendant Lu used violence to attack the police officers and auxiliary police officers. Defendant Chen held the auxiliary police officer by the waist to obstruct law enforcement, and grabbed the auxiliary police officer's tear gas, spraying it into the auxiliary police officer's face. The obstruction of law enforcement only ceased after police officer You fired two warning shots. The defendants did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are sufficiently evidenced by the household registration proofs, arrest records, defendants' confessions, victim statements, witness testimonies, identification transcripts and photos, on-site identification transcripts and photos, audio-visual materials, letters of understanding, and documentary evidence presented by the public prosecution and verified by this court. It was also found that the two defendants have compensated the victims for economic losses and obtained their understanding.", "label": {"Lu": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 9 p.m. on January 11, 2014, the defendants Wang, Zheng, and Huang (at large) intercepted vehicles at random on the road near Donghai Department Store on Tangtou Avenue, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District after drinking. They damaged the mirror of a car. The victims Qiu, Wang A, and Zhou stepped forward to intervene and were assaulted by Wang, Zheng, and Huang. Later, the police arrived at the scene after receiving a report and arrested Wang and Zheng. According to the assessment, the injuries of victims Qiu and Wang A were minor, and victim Zhou's injuries did not reach the level of minor. Furthermore, on January 20, 2014, the defendants Wang and Zheng compensated the victims Qiu and Wang A for their financial losses and received forgiveness. The defendants Wang and Zheng had no objection to the above facts during the trial, and these facts are corroborated by relevant evidence verified in court, sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was determined: On April 22, 2014, Wei, Tian, Zhang, and Ge (all of whom have been sentenced) jointly organized others to gamble in the form of \"Bullfighting\" at the \"Swallowtail\" teahouse on Wangyue Road, Hanjiang District, of a certain city, and took a share of the profits. Among them, Zhang invited the defendant Zhou. Later, defendant Zhou and defendant Bo went together and invested 40,000 yuan and 10,000 yuan, respectively, with defendant Bo providing funds to the gamblers on site. During the gambling, the total amount of money involved exceeded 100,000 yuan, with over 20,000 yuan being taken as profit. Defendant Zhou received a \"kickback\" and interest totaling over 6,000 yuan from Zhang, out of which the interest obtained from providing gambling funds was 1,500 yuan (calculated at 300 yuan interest per 10,000 yuan), and defendant Bo received 300 yuan of this interest. After the case was discovered, defendant Zhou truthfully confessed to his criminal activity; defendant Bo, after being summoned by the public security authority via phone, voluntarily surrendered and also truthfully confessed to his criminal activity. The public security authority seized 80,000 yuan from defendant Zhou. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Bo during court proceedings, and are confirmed by their statements during the investigation phase, the statements of co-defendants Wei, Zhang, and Shi who were not present in court, identification records and photographs, a seizure list, the public security administrative penalty decision, details of arrests, household registration data, and other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Bo": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution agency charges that: On August 18, 2015, at approximately 1:00 PM, officers from the Houmiao Police Station of the Taiqian County Public Security Bureau seized a barrel of suspected drugs at the home of the defendant Fu. Upon investigation, it was found that the drugs belonged to Fu's second elder brother, Fu A (who is being dealt with in a separate case), who had placed them in Fu's home. Additionally, Fu A instructed Fu to transfer and conceal the drugs, and Fu instructed Zhang to transfer and conceal the drugs. The seized drugs were weighed at a total of 655.94 grams, and testing confirmed the presence of methcathinone in the suspected drugs. The evidence establishing the above facts includes physical evidence; documentary evidence; testimony from the witness Zhao; confessions from the defendants Fu and Zhang; expert opinions; records of search, extraction, and identification of the scene; and audiovisual materials.", "label": {"Fu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at approximately 2 a.m. on July 22, 2016, the defendants Huang and Du, after premeditation, arrived at the entrance of Donggeng Village Primary School in Louqiao Street, a certain district of a certain city. They attempted to steal from vehicles parked there by trying to open the car doors. However, they were unsuccessful because the doors were locked or there were no valuables inside the vehicles whose doors they managed to open. At around 3 a.m. that day, Huang and Du went to the lawn at the entrance of Chuitai Mountain Park Square in Donggeng Village, Louqiao Street. Taking advantage of the victim Guo sleeping, they stole a pack of Liqun cigarettes (containing 3 or 4 cigarettes) and an iPhone 6 (valued at 3,212 yuan) from the pocket of his pants. Later that morning, Huang and Du went to the \"Apple Experience Center\" on Guoding Road, Qianhua Village, Xinqiao Street, in a certain district of a certain city, where they sold the stolen phone for 1,500 yuan and shared the proceeds. After the crime, the phone was recovered and returned to the victim Guo. Huang and Du did not dispute these facts during the trial. Their actions are substantiated by Guo's testimony, the testimonies of witnesses Mother 1 and Mother 2, the price evaluation report, identification records and photos, surveillance video discs, a surveillance narrative, the list of accepted evidence, the list and photos of returned items, the arrest process, and identity verification materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that: 1. On or around June 8, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to use methamphetamine at his home. 2. On the morning of June 10, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to inject heroin at his home. 3. On the afternoon of June 10, 2020, defendant Zhang allowed the drug user Gan to inject heroin at his home. 4. On the morning of June 11, 2020, drug user Li went to defendant Zhang's home to purchase heroin. Zhang instructed defendant Gan to weigh 0.2 grams of heroin for Li, receiving 200 yuan for the transaction. Zhang allowed Li and Gan to inject heroin at his home. Later that afternoon, the police apprehended defendants Gan and Zhang and lawfully searched Gan, recovering 7 syringes and 1 electronic scale; they lawfully searched Zhang's home, recovering 8 sets of drug use tools, 1 roll of tin foil, 1 box of straws, and 1 box of transparent plastic bags. In summary, Zhang and Gan sold heroin once, totaling 0.2 grams; Zhang allowed Gan and Li to consume and inject drugs a total of 5 times.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, and Tan were successively deceived by online acquaintances into going to a certain place, where they joined a pyramid scheme organization called \"Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Co., Ltd.\" They were respectively elected by the members of the organization as \"Housekeeper,\" \"Lock Leader,\" \"Big Brother,\" and \"Master.\" On May 11, 2015, the victim, Chen, was lured to the 302 room at the back door of No. 175 Yixian Road, Xiahai District, by a female netizen under the pretense of friendship. The defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, Tan, Zhao (handled in a separate case), Gan (handled in a separate case), Deng (handled in a separate case), and Yi (handled in a separate case), following the prior arrangement and onsite command of Tan Moumou (handled in a separate case), attempted to make the victim Chen subservient to management and join the pyramid scheme as soon as possible. First, Yang, Gan, and Zhao pinned Chen to the ground, and the others forcibly restrained Chen. Tan Moumou and Liao each beat and intimidated Chen so that he dared not resist. Tan Moumou promptly directed others to search Chen and take away items such as his mobile phone, ID card, and bank card. Then Yang, Zou, Liao, Tan, Zhao, Gan, Deng, and Yi were apprehended by the police at the pyramid scheme's hideout, and the victim Chen was rescued. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang, Zou, Liao, and Tan during the court hearing, and they were corroborated by the victim Chen's statement, testimonies of witnesses Mo, Zhao, Gan, Deng, and Yi, the list of seized and returned items, mobile communication records, the house lease agreement, photo identification records, on-site inspection transcripts, scene diagrams and photos, the police statement, apprehension details, household registration certificates, and other evidence, sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment"], "Liao": ["Imprisonment"], "Tan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The facts of the case as determined by the court are consistent with the charges brought by the public prosecution. It is also found that the father of the defendant Jiang has compensated the victim with 4,314 RMB through the court. The evidence supporting the aforementioned facts includes: 1. Documentation such as seizure and return lists, the process of bringing suspects to justice, household registration certificates, applications, etc.; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Liu and Dai, among others; 3. The statement of the victim Wang; 4. Confessions of the defendants Jiang and Cao; 5. Price appraisal reports; 6. Identification records, search records, on-site investigation records, and site diagrams; 7. On-site photos and photos of the stolen goods, etc. The above evidence corroborates each other and is sufficient to confirm the facts. The facts of the case are clear, and the evidence is true and sufficient.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Cao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On December 10, 2015, the defendants, Dong and Li, drove a rented sedan with license plate D××××× from a certain city in a province, carrying a set of temporary emergency communication base station equipment. At around 10 a.m. on December 11, Dong and Li arrived near a district in a city of the province, using the equipment to send bank deduction text messages to unspecified individuals, and left the district at around 12 p.m. On December 12, at around 7 a.m., Dong and Li drove to a county town in a certain location and again used the base station equipment to send bank deduction text messages until around 10:40 a.m., when they were apprehended by the police at the intersection of Qin Nan Road and Tao Xi Road in the county town. According to the assessment, the equipment meets the characteristics of a pseudo base station, and a total of 13,006 fraudulent text messages were sent on December 11 and December 12, 2015.", "label": {"Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that: \n\n1. On January 27, 2020, the defendant Zhao stole three bottles of Hetao liquor in a basement in ×× County, and sold the stolen three bottles of Hetao liquor to Yongfu Convenience Store on Beijie Street, Zhuozi County. \n\n2. Between January 29, 2020 and February 9, 2020, the defendant Zhao repeatedly stole items such as liquor, wine, tea leaves, and cooking oil from a basement in ×× County, and sold all the stolen goods at prices below market value to the other defendant in this case, Cheng, on Daqing Street, Zhuozi County, exchanging them for drugs (heroin) for personal use. \n\n3. In February 2020, the defendant Zhao stole unstripped copper wire in ×× County, which weighed 50 jin after stripping. \n\n4. From April 2019 to February 2020, the defendant Cheng repeatedly sold drugs to Zhao, Li Moumou, Cao Moumou, Mi Moumou, and Zhang Moumou. \n\n5. From January 2020 to mid-February 2020, the defendant Cheng repeatedly purchased liquor, wine, tea leaves, and other items that the defendant Zhao stole from unit three, No. 3 building, Jiali Community, at prices below market value.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that the defendant Zhang and the victim Chen had a dispute online due to disagreement in words, and they insulted each other. On June 23, 2014, at around 23:00, Zhang and Chen agreed to fight at Weishan Lake Lobster Restaurant on the south side road of Xinwen Middle School. Zhang gathered defendant Han and others to help. Zhang arrived at the scene first and engaged in a scuffle with Chen. After Han arrived at the scene, he punched Chen in the jaw, causing Chen to fall to the ground. Zhang then kicked Chen's head and body, resulting in Chen sustaining a full-layer lip laceration categorized as minor injury level two. On July 3, 2014, the defendant Zhang voluntarily surrendered, and on October 24, 2014, defendants Zhang and Han jointly compensated Chen for various economic losses totaling 50,000 yuan, obtaining forgiveness. The defendants Zhang and Han had no objection to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and these facts were confirmed by the statement", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that at around 14:00 on March 7, 2019, defendants Li, Rong, and Liu drove to a certain location in a town in a certain city (a hunting prohibited area) during the closed season and used a high-pressure air gun to hunt, illegally capturing 2 common moorhens, 1 spotted dove, and 1 mallard duck. Among them, Rong was responsible for driving the vehicle, Li hunted with the high-pressure air gun, and Liu collected the prey. According to identification by the wildlife protection station of a certain city, these 4 birds are terrestrial wildlife under national protection and are banned from hunting by the province due to their important ecological, scientific, and social research value.", "label": {"Li": ["Fine"], "Rong": ["Fine"], "Liu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that, at around 2 a.m. on July 28, 2014, in the courtyard at the south gate of the snack city on Jianshe Road in a certain town of Weishan County, defendants Zhu, Yuan, and Zhang, along with others, were having a meal together. Due to a trivial matter, Zhang and the victim, Liu, got into an argument and exchanged insults. Zhu and Yuan were dissatisfied with Liu's words and actions. Yuan chased Liu with a beer bottle, and Zhu injured Liu with a kitchen knife. Forensic examination determined Liu's injuries to be minor injuries of the first degree. Zhu also used a kitchen knife to damage the front windshield of victim Liu's vehicle. According to the appraisal by the Weishan County Price Certification Center, the total value of the damage to the front windshield was 11,760 yuan. Regarding the above charges, the prosecution presented evidence including the victim's statements, witness testimonies, expert opinions, audiovisual materials, related documentary evidence, as well as the defendants' confessions and defenses.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in a district of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region accused that on May 6, 2012, the villagers of Nongquan Hamlet, a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, protested against the blasting operations of the Xinbao Quarry affecting their production and livelihood by blocking the construction at Xinbao Quarry. During this process, a villager named Meng pushed the Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform off a cliff, resulting in the machine being damaged. On July 18, the price certification center of a certain county, commissioned by the county's Public Security Bureau, conducted a price appraisal for the Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform, determining the damaged control platform was valued at 6,054.40 yuan. On July 27, the county's Public Security Bureau, based on this price appraisal, filed a case against Meng for suspected intentional damage to property, detained him on July 30, and executed an arrest on August 9. On September 24, Meng raised objections to the appraisal opinion issued by the county's price certification center and applied for a reappraisal. The county's price certification center immediately reorganized personnel, including the former director of the county's price bureau Liang and others such as Wei, Luo, to investigate the equipment's price in some province and county, confirming discrepancies in the original appraisal. On September 29, the county's price certification center revoked the appraisal conclusion previously issued and recommissioned the appraisal process. On September 30, the county's People's Procuratorate decided to grant bail for Meng. On March 20, 2013, the county's Public Security Bureau re-commissioned the price certification center of a district in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region to appraise the price of the involved property, which concluded on April 8, 2013, that the destroyed Zhigao brand 70A downhole drill control platform was valued at 890 yuan. On May 7, 2013, the county's People's Procuratorate determined that the value of the damaged property in Meng's case did not meet the prosecution threshold of over 5,000 yuan and decided to drop the charges against Meng for intentional damage to property.", "label": {"Wei": [], "Luo": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: The victim Zhang had a storage site for bridge materials in a village of a town in a certain county, where he employed Liu, one of the defendants, as a site administrator responsible for the safety of the materials. During the first lunar month of 2019, Liu, in collusion with another defendant, Gong, with the intent of illegal possession and through mutual conspiracy, stole fifteen steel plates from the storage site and sold them to a person named Zhu. They received a total of 10,500 yuan from this sale. Subsequently, Liu received 2,000 yuan of the illicit money, which has now been squandered, while the remaining amount was obtained by Gong. According to the appraisal by the price certification center of the county, the market value of the stolen items is 16,125 yuan. The evidence supporting the aforementioned facts includes: documentary evidence, witness testimonies, victim statements, confessions and defense statements of the defendants, inspection and identification records, appraisal opinions, and on-site investigation records. The collection procedure of the above evidence is legitimate, and the content is objective and truthful, sufficient to establish the facts charged. Defendants Liu and Gong have no objections to the criminal facts and evidence charged against them, and they voluntarily plead guilty and accept punishment.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on a day after New Year's Day 2016, in the \"Southeast Circle\" canal beach area of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu (already sentenced) to illegally fell 10 poplar trees belonging to victims Wei, without obtaining a forest logging permit. According to the forestry bureau of the certain county, the volume of the 10 felled poplar trees was appraised at 3.658 cubic meters. On another day after New Year's Day 2016, within the southern cemetery of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu to illegally fell 15 poplar trees belonging to Yu, without obtaining a forest logging permit. The forestry bureau of the certain county appraised the volume of the 15 felled poplar trees at 6.0047 cubic meters. On January 8 and January 9, 2016, at the \"South Riverside\" canal beach area of a village in a certain town and county, defendant Wu and defendant Sun reached an agreement with tree seller Yu to illegally fell 32 poplar trees belonging to victim Liu, without obtaining a forest logging permit. According to the forestry bureau of the certain county, the volume of the 32 felled poplar trees was appraised at 10.378 cubic meters. It was further discovered that, following the incident, defendants Wu and Sun turned themselves in to the county public security bureau, truthfully confessing the main facts of the crime. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the court proceedings and were substantiated by the confessions of defendants Wu and Sun, the testimonies of witnesses Liu, Wei, Yu, Li, and Wang, the on-site inspection records and photographs, schematic diagrams, appraisal by the county forestry bureau, arrest process records, the criminal judgment, and residency proofs of defendants Wu and Sun, which are sufficient to affirm the charges.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on August 17, 2015, defendants Zhou and Deng used police identification holder purchased to impersonate police officers and confiscated the victim Luo's electric scooter by the roadside of Heping Road in a new district of a certain place. They later sold the scooter for a profit of 600 yuan, which they split equally. On September 10, 2015, Zhou and Deng used the same method to confiscate the victim Zhang's electric scooter at a bus stop in Qinghu Zhenhua Industrial Zone in a new district of a certain place, later selling it for a profit of 700 yuan, with Zhou receiving 400 yuan and Deng receiving 300 yuan.\n\nOn the afternoon of October 25, 2015, defendants Zhou and He used the same method near the Qinghu subway station in a new district of a certain place to seize an electric scooter and later collected 370 yuan from the victim. Around 4 p.m. on October 25, 2015, Zhou and He used the same method to confiscate the victim Chen's electric scooter by the roadside of Baoneng Science and Technology Park in Qinghu of a new district of a certain place, with Zhou hiding the scooter in his home. Around 5 p.m. on October 25, 2015, He was apprehended by the public and reported to the police. Based on He's statement, the police apprehended Zhou and, subsequently based on Zhou's statement, apprehended Deng.\n\nAll three defendants raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the trial, and relevant evidence was presented and verified in court, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "He": ["Imprisonment"], "Deng": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: From early June to July 17, 2020, the defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang agreed beforehand to divide the work and share the profits equally. Yang was responsible for driving, Shi for contacting the suppliers and setting up the \"Luomanbao\" equipment, and Jia for testing the phone cards. The defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang drove to various provinces and locations, purchasing \"Luomanbao,\" phone cards, switches, and other equipment online to build \"communication relay stations.\" They sent the account name and password of the \"Luomanbao\" to overseas fraud groups for them to make remote calls, displaying false caller ID locations to carry out scams. The defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang illegally profited over 260,000 RMB from these activities. Among the numerous numbers used by the defendants Shi, Jia, and Yang in operating the Luomanbao equipment for the scammers, the police verified that they defrauded victims such as Sun and Liu of over 920,000 RMB. After the crime was uncovered, defendants Shi and Jia truthfully confessed their crimes; Shi and Jia respectively returned illegal gains of 6,000 RMB and 116,172 RMB. To prove the aforementioned facts, the public prosecutor interrogated the defendants in court and presented evidence including the defendants' confessions and defenses during police investigation, witness testimonies, search records, seizure warrants, lists of seized items, notices for obtaining evidence, lists of received evidence materials, WeChat chat screenshots, Alipay and WeChat transfer records, bank transaction details, arrest process records, and household registration information.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jia": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain region charged that on April 10, 2015, at around 5:00 PM, the defendants Xue and Bao took Bus No. 12 to a stop near Shengshi Spring Bus Station in Xingqing District, Yinchuan City. When a fellow passenger, Ye, was not paying attention, they stole a wallet that contained 81 yuan in cash as well as bank cards and a social security card. After the case was solved, the stolen items were recovered and returned.", "label": {"Bao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xue": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that between February 2013 and March 18, 2014, the defendants Shi and his wife Wu rented a factory building in a certain village in a district of a city to operate a hardware blackening processing factory without a business license. They discharged wastewater and waste acid produced during the production process into the surface ground through a sedimentation tank without treatment, without obtaining environmental impact approval documents and without any sewage treatment equipment. During this period, defendant Shi was responsible for business negotiations and daily management; defendant Wu assisted Shi in tasks such as dumping products and applying oil when the workload was heavy. According to monitoring by the Environmental Protection Monitoring Station in a district of a city, the indicators of total zinc, total nickel, and total chromium in the wastewater discharged by this processing factory did not meet standards, exceeding the first-class standard in the \"Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard\" GB8978-1996 by more than three times, which severely polluted the environment. On March 18, 2014, the defendants Shi and Wu were apprehended by the police at a certain village in a district of a city. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by defendants Shi and Wu during the trial, and are substantiated by testimonies from witnesses Xiang, Hong, and Xu; on-site inspection records; Monitoring Report No. 87 (2014) Water by the Environmental Protection Monitoring Station in a district of a city; the Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Department's approval of Monitoring Report No. 87 (2014) Water; site photos; on-site sampling video CD; case transfer letter; explanation of circumstances; and identification documents of the two defendants, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was ascertained that around 10 p.m. on June 2, 2015, the defendants Pang and Deng, along with another man, had a dispute over trivial matters with the victim, taxi driver Zhao, at the intersection of Longma City on Cuiwei East Road in Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City. Subsequently, defendant Pang used a frying pan and, together with defendant Deng and the other man, assaulted the victim Zhao, causing Zhao to suffer fractures of the 9th and 10th ribs on the right side, as well as injuries around the right eye and waist (as determined by an appraisal, the injuries inflicted on Zhao were categorized as second-degree minor injuries). On June 15, 2015, defendants Pang and Deng compensated the victim Zhao for economic losses amounting to 30,000 RMB, after which Zhao expressed understanding towards them. On June 16, 2015, defendants Pang and Deng surrendered to the public security authorities. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Pang and Deng during the trial proceedings, and are corroborated by the statements and identification records of the victim Zhao, the testimony of witness Huang, the surrender statement, the forensic appraisal of bodily injuries, household registration information, and evidence such as photographs of the scene and surveillance videos, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Pang": ["Detention"], "Deng": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xiaodian District, a certain city, charges that on April 12, 2015, at around 12:18 pm, at the restaurant in the administrative building of Shanxi Dayi Hospital on Longcheng Street, Xiaodian District, the defendants Zhang and Du, while dining, took advantage of the victim Li's inattention while eating in the restaurant to steal a wallet that had fallen from Li's shoulder bag to the ground. The stolen wallet contained 2000 yuan in cash, an identity card, a social security card, and other belongings. The stolen property has now been returned to the victim, and the defendants have obtained the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and are sufficiently substantiated by evidence including the victim's report and statement record, the details of the arrest, a list of seized and returned items, video materials, a letter of forgiveness, the defendants' confessions, and their identification.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Fine"], "Du": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Nanjing City accused that in order to collect a debt, defendants Wang and Zhou, upon arrangement by defendant Wang, had defendant Zhou and others take the victim, Sun, to Room A-401, No. 72 Huju North Road, Gulou District, in the city for detention at around 12:00 on September 25, 2013, in a Walmart parking lot in a certain district of the city. Defendant Wan, at around 22:00 on the same day, was arranged by defendant Wang to join defendant Zhou in detaining the victim, Sun. At around 17:00 on September 27 of the same year, the victim Sun issued an IOU to defendant Wang, after which defendant Wang intended to let the victim Sun leave. However, defendant Zhou, due to unresolved debt issues with Sun, continued to detain the victim Sun at the aforementioned location along with defendant Wan. At around 17:00 on September 28 of the same year, the victim Sun was rescued by the police, and defendants Zhou and Wan were arrested by the police at the aforementioned location. On November 21 of the same year, defendant Wang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. After the three defendants were brought to justice, they all truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. During the court trial, there were no objections from defendants Wang, Zhou, and Wan regarding the above facts, which were substantiated by a list of collected evidence, call records, explanatory notes, and other documentary evidence; testimonies from witnesses Yi, Chen, Liu, and Lü; statements from victim Sun; on-site inspection records, examination records, details of the arrest, accounts of how they were brought to justice, prior criminal records, household registration data and other evidence produced by a branch of the Nanjing Public Security Bureau, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Wan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city accused that on the morning of November 15, 2016, the defendants Chen, Dong, Luo, Liu, and Hu, along with Ding (who is being handled in a separate case), drove a truck with the license plate Su H××××× to the dormitory of the Silk Weaving Factory on Hong Kong Road, Wangying Town, in a certain district of a certain city to dismantle China Telecom cables. During this process, defendant Dong discovered that there were cables in use belonging to the Huaian branch of China Mobile Tietong Co., Ltd. Subsequently, defendants Dong, Chen, Luo, Hu, and Liu dismantled these cables without permission and sold part of the cables, splitting the proceeds among themselves. According to an appraisal, the value of the stolen cables was 2,517 RMB. After the incident, the five defendants were apprehended and summoned by the public security authorities on December 27 and 28, 2016. After being brought to justice, they were all able to truthfully confess the facts of the crime. Additionally, the defendant's boss, Shi (1), has compensated the victim unit for the loss, and the victim unit expressed understanding of the defendants' actions. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Dong, Chen, Luo, Liu, and Hu during the court proceedings. Furthermore, there was supporting evidence from the testimony of Li, the litigation representative of the victim unit; testimonies from unnamed witnesses Shi (1), Jiang, Liu, Shen, Shi (2), Zhou, and others who were not present in court; engineering diagrams of the cable lines provided by China Mobile Tietong; identification records; on-site inspection records; price appraisal reports; receipts; letters of understanding; statements from the Huaian District Public Security Bureau of a certain city; as well as evidence of the case proceedings, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Dong": ["Fine"], "Chen": ["Fine"], "Luo": ["Fine"], "Liu": ["Fine"], "Hu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district of a certain city charges: From January to March 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and others engaged in theft on buses, and Liu drove a car to follow the buses and assist. They stole mobile phones, cash, and other items with a total value of 10,786 RMB. After the incident, all the stolen property was recovered. The specific details are as follows: 1. On the afternoon of January 1, 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and another individual engaged in theft on a bus. Liu drove a car to follow and assist, and on bus route No. 2, they stole cash totaling over 700 RMB and one gold Apple brand mobile phone (worth 4,950 RMB) from the victim Chen, with a total value of over 5,650 RMB. 2. On March 12, 2016, defendants Tang and Liu conspired with others to go to a certain district of a certain city, where Tang and two others engaged in theft on a bus. Liu drove a car to follow and assist, and on bus route No. 2, they stole one gold Apple brand mobile phone from the victim Li, worth 2,856 RMB. 3. Subsequently, Tang, in conspiracy with others, engaged in theft on a bus, and Liu drove a car to follow and assist, stealing one rose gold OPPO brand mobile phone from the victim Huang on bus route No. 5, worth 2,280 RMB. In response to the facts of the above accusations, the prosecution presented relevant evidence to prove these charges.", "label": {"Tang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Longgang District in a certain city charged that on February 21, 2014, an individual named Su contacted defendant Liu to purchase drugs. Defendant Liu then contacted another defendant, Mo, through Su A (handled in a separate case) to buy drugs for resale. At approximately 11 p.m. on the same day, defendant Liu and Su A arrived at the intersection of XX Road in XX Community, Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District, a certain city, to meet Su. After receiving 200 yuan from Su as payment for the drugs, Liu proceeded to a nearby alley at No. X, Lane XX, XX Community, Pingshan Street, Pingshan New District, to purchase a small packet of methamphetamine from defendant Mo for selling to Su. At around 11:20 p.m., as defendant Liu returned to the Biling intersection to deliver the drugs to Su, he was apprehended by the police. The officers seized 0.36 grams of methamphetamine that he intended to sell. After being captured, defendant Liu, seeking to make a meritorious contribution, voluntarily confessed that the drugs he intended to sell were obtained from defendant Mo and led the police to Mo's small shop to arrest him. An appraisal confirmed that the seized drugs weighed 0.36 grams and contained methamphetamine.", "label": {"Mo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charges the following: 1. On April 18, 2019, defendants Li and Lu organized a group of people to gamble by playing \"a certain type of poker\" in a certain district of a certain city, garnering over 30,000 RMB in profits from rake-offs. During this time, defendant Ma was responsible for managing the chips and other tasks, and defendant Lu provided the venue. 2. On April 20 of the same year, defendants Li and Lu organized another group of people to gamble by playing \"a certain type of poker\" in a certain district of a certain city, obtaining more than 70,000 RMB in profits from rake-offs. During this period, defendant Ma was responsible for managing the chips and other tasks; defendant Dan helped arrange the venue and the card dealers; defendant Ying was responsible for dealing the cards and handling the rake-offs, involving over 50,000 RMB in rake-offs; defendant Liu was responsible for dealing the cards and handling the rake-offs, involving over 10,000 RMB in rake-offs.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ying": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that the defendants Cui and Zhang are friends. Between April 18 and April 26, 2020, defendants Cui and Zhang distributed and posted pre-made cards and stickers containing their personal WeChat QR code and the download QR code for the XinHao WanFeng International app in various locations, including some neighborhoods such as Wangfu Jiayuan, Fuguiyuan, Xingdong Phase II, Dongguan Xincun, Baodi, Qinghua Garden, Xuefu Garden, Mudanyuan, Xingdong Jiayuan, Guangshengde, and Lijing Garden. The purpose was to promote the XinHao WanFeng International gambling website; participants would download the gambling site and recharge. Cui would receive a rebate of 0.8% of the recharge amount from the site. By the time Cui was arrested, Cui and Zhang had distributed 6,655 cards and stickers and had earned a rebate of 193 yuan, with more than 300 undistributed stickers found. The aforementioned facts were uncontested by defendants Cui and Zhang during the trial. The facts were also supported by the prosecution's presentation of evidence, which was uncontested during cross-examination, including two mobile phones, the decision to file the case, household registration information, details of the arrest, 345 gambling-related advertisement stickers, Cui's Alipay transaction records, witness testimony from Cao, on-site inspection records from Cui and Zhang’s homes, audiovisual materials on video discs, and confessions from defendants Cui and Zhang, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Cui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution authority charges that in the early morning of October 27, 2015, defendants Li and Deng conspired to go to Kunhe Bath Center next to Aiyimei Hotel in Jinping Street, a certain city. Taking advantage of the fact that the bath center was unstaffed due to an inspection, they stole a total of more than 4,500 RMB in cash from the lockers in the technicians' room on the second floor, which belonged to victims Yao, Zhang (1), Chen (1), Yang, Zhang (2), Luo, Yao (2), and Tan. On October 28, 2015, the police arrested defendant Li near Aiyimei Hotel. On May 3, 2016, defendant Deng turned himself in to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed his criminal activities after being apprehended. After the incident, the stolen goods were returned to the victims. Defendant Li and Deng raised no objection to these facts during the court trial, and the facts are substantiated by the statements of victims Yao, Zhang (1), Chen (1), Yang, Zhang (2), Luo, Yao (2), Tan, and the testimonies of witnesses Deng, Chen (3), and Chen (2), as well as on-site identification records and photos, personal identification records and photos, seizure lists, return lists, photos, explanatory notes, population information, and records of how they were brought to justice, which are sufficient to make a conviction. Based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants, the prosecution suggests sentencing defendant Li to detention for four to six months and a fine; and suggests sentencing defendant Deng to detention for three to five months and a fine.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that defendant Chen is the owner of the XX Bakery in the Henan Community, Jiangkou Town, Fengkai County, and defendant Li is the wife of defendant Chen. The two jointly operate the XX Bakery. The XX Bakery has been in operation since 1995, producing and wholesaling steamed buns to retailers in certain locations. Despite the notice issued by the Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration in May 2014, clearly informing them not to add aluminum-containing food additives in their food production, defendants Chen and Li still used the aluminum-containing additive \"Osmanthus\" brand sweet baking powder to make steamed buns and sold them to retailers. On April 14, 2015, staff from the Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration inspected the XX Bakery, sampled the steamed buns it produced and sold, and seized a batch of \"Osmanthus\" brand sweet baking powder and a bottle of lemon yellow coloring. According to the inspection by the Quality Supervision Department, the sampled steamed buns had an aluminum content of 152.43 mg/kg, which is an unqualified product. Defendant Chen and Li have not disputed the above facts during the trial. Additionally, there are pieces of evidence such as the case registration form and filing decision, the process of arrest, household registration proof, criminal record inquiry, testimonies of witnesses Ou, Hou, Liu, relevant administrative materials transferred by Fengkai County Food and Drug Administration, inspection record, copies of the individual business license and food circulation permit, Inspection Report from Zhaoqing City Quality and Metrology Supervision and Testing Institute of Guangdong Province, on-site inspection record and photos, and confessions of defendants Chen and Li, which are sufficient to establish conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On February 1, 2016, at approximately 2 PM, defendants Tan, Wei, and Wen were arranged by \"Brother Li\" to gather gamblers for gambling in a house located at No. 50, Group 3, Ghegujiang Xincun, Changtang Town, Liubei District, Liuzhou City. Defendant Tan was responsible for running the \"He Li\" inside the house, while defendants Wei and Wen were responsible for keeping watch outside the house.", "label": {"Tan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges: In the first half of 2015, the Agriculture Committee and the Finance Bureau of a certain county included hickory husks as part of the scope for subsidy for solidified utilization as straw energy, with a subsidy standard of 150 yuan/ton. In April 2015, the defendants Sun and Huang, using the name of the Jinfu Company, signed a \"Comprehensive Utilization (Acquisition) Framework Agreement for Straw\" with a township and a town in the county. In August 2015, they again signed a \"Comprehensive Utilization (Acquisition) Framework Agreement for Straw\" with the same township and town. By forging transporters' signatures and asking transporters to sign more than necessary on the \"Comprehensive Utilization of Straw Transportation Status Table of XX Town, a certain county,\" they falsely reported a total of 4,847 tons of hickory husks collected, transported, and utilized (reported a total of 6,347 tons of hickory husks, but only 1,500 tons were actually collected), and created false company warehouse entry records, thus fraudulently obtaining fiscal incentive funds amounting to 727,000 yuan. Of this, defendant Huang received 220,000 yuan of the illicit money, while the remaining funds stayed with Jinfu Company. To support the above charges, the prosecution has presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions, and defenses by the defendants, search records, and other evidences for corroboration.", "label": {"Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The trial established that at around 9 p.m. on October 21, 2013, in the \"Keda Internet Cafe\" on the second floor of Baijihui Plaza in Changle County, the victim, Li Moujia, found the game sounds from Wei to be too loud and had a dispute with him. Due to verbal disagreements, the defendants, Zhang Moujia (already sentenced), Wei, and Liang, injured the victims Li Moujia, Xue Moujia, and Xue Mouyi. According to the forensic examination by the Changle County Public Security Bureau, the injuries of Li Moujia and Xue Mouyi were classified as minor injuries. In 2008, defendant Wei was subjected to one year of labor reeducation for picking quarrels and provoking trouble. The victims, Li Moujia, Xue Mouyi, and Xue Moujia, reached a settlement agreement with the defendants Zhang Moujia, Wei, and Liang's families. Defendants Zhang Moujia and Wei compensated the three victims a total of 12,000 yuan for economic losses, and defendant Liang compensated the three victims 5,000 yuan for economic losses. The three victims expressed understanding towards the actions of the defendants Zhang Moujia, Wei, and Liang and suggested the court impose lenient or exempt criminal punishment on the defendants. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Wei and Liang during the trial. These facts were corroborated by the confessions of the co-defendant Zhang Moujia, statements from the victims Li Moujia, Xue Mouyi, and Xue Moujia, witness testimonies, forensic medical injury assessment from the Changle County Public Security Bureau, notification of assessment conclusions, administrative penalty decision, details of capture, previous conviction records, household registration proof, the settlement agreement, and letters of understanding, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that during the period from April 8 to April 16, 2015, the defendants Huang, Hong, and Wu were hired at a daily wage of 80 yuan to set up a gambling operation on a vacant lot next to Dongfeng Market in Xiasan District, a city. They used dice for gambling in the “Fish-Prawn-Crab” style. Among them, defendant Huang was responsible for being the banker, defendant Hong was responsible for handling numbers, and defendant Wu was responsible for looking out. The gambling den gathered several gamblers daily for gambling activities. A man nicknamed \"Duck\" (handled in another case) was in charge of managing the casino's profits and paying the wages of the three defendants. On April 16, 2015, at around 11 a.m., defendants Huang and Hong were caught by the police while gambling at the casino with gamblers Li, Chen Yi, Lü Yi, Lin, and others. The police seized gambling funds amounting to 834 yuan and a batch of gambling tools on the spot. Later that day, around 4 p.m., the police arrested defendant Wu. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Huang, Hong, and Wu during the court trial. The testimonies of witnesses Li, Chen Yi, Lü Yi, and Lin, as well as identification records, inspection records, search records, inventory of confiscated items, photographs of seized items, on-site investigation records and photographs, electronic surveillance video screenshots, confessions of the three defendants, the arrest process, and basic resident information provided by the police, all serve as evidence sufficient to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Huang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Hong": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and investigation, it was found that in early September 2014, the defendant Yan wanted to make money by producing and selling counterfeit cigarettes. He purchased individual cigarettes, packaging paper, shrink film, and packaging boxes, and contacted the defendant Wang to help find workers for packaging the counterfeit cigarettes. Defendant Wang brought defendants Lian, Zhang, and Li to Yan's rented house in a certain village of a certain county in a certain city. The five defendants, knowing they had not obtained a license, began processing counterfeit \"Great Hall of the People\" cigarettes on September 9th. They had not yet sold them when they were discovered on September 10th. The Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of the city seized 134 cartons of \"Great Hall of the People\" (hard red), 276.6 cartons of \"Great Hall of the People\" (from a certain place), 34.6 cartons of \"Great Hall of the People\" (soft), 135,000 loose cigarettes, and tools used for the crime, and transferred them to the New City Branch of the Public Security Bureau of the city. According to the appraisal by the Tobacco Quality Testing Station of Hebei Province, the cigarettes they processed were counterfeit registered trademarks and substandard cigarettes. The valuation by the Hebei Tobacco Monopoly Bureau determined the value of the counterfeit cigarettes to be 173,709 yuan. The above facts were not contested by the five defendants, who expressed their willingness to plead guilty. The case is corroborated by evidence such as the process of arrest, case resolution, appraisal opinions, and household registration certificates, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yan": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: Since 2012, \"Tong\" (at large) rented the fourth floor of \"Some Grand Hotel\" located in a certain district's street office to operate a bath center, hiring Ran and Li to be responsible for daily operations. On May 8, 2014, at around 20:00, police officers conducted a routine inspection at the hotel and discovered Wang and Hu engaged in prostitution activities in a private room. Ran, Li, and the waiter Wang, who introduced two prostitutes to customers that night, were arrested on the spot. 4,615 yuan in prostitution fees were seized. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial and were substantiated by the report materials; testimonies from witnesses Wang, Hu, Ding, Gao, and others; site identification records and photos; identification transcripts; the arrest process; administrative penalty decision; and household registration proof of the three defendants, which are indeed comprehensive and sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ran": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination and verification: From June 2013 until the case was uncovered, defendants Peng and Qin, while serving as the Planning and Customer Service Manager and Regional Sales Director of A Fragrance (China) Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as \"Company A\"), respectively, exploited the job convenience of Peng, who managed the warehouse. Qin contacted buyers to illicitly remove lemon oil terpenes worth RMB 225,610 stored in the warehouse from the company and sold them through others to a person named Zheng. The proceeds were misappropriated for their personal use. On October 29, 2014, defendants Peng and Qin surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. After the case was uncovered, both defendants returned all the illicit gains and obtained Company A's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were also undisputed by defendants Peng and Qin during court proceedings. Additionally, these facts were substantiated by the business license, job application form, labor contract, specific job descriptions, and letter of forgiveness provided by Company A; statements from the victim unit's employees, Ren and Qian; testimonies from witnesses Cai, Zheng, Wang, and He; the explanatory note, sales invoices provided by B Fragrance (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; and bank account details of Cai, Cai Jia, and Qin, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Peng": ["Imprisonment"], "Qin": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain banner charged that on October 11, 2020, the Hanshan Police Station of the Forest Public Security Bureau of a certain banner received a report from the public that a pickup truck was engaged in hunting in the East Mountain Valley of a certain place in the banner. The police immediately went to the scene and later found four defendants one mile north of a certain village in a certain town. In the back of the pickup truck driven by Hou, they discovered suspected game: 18 sand partridges and 3 pheasants. They also found a stainless steel slingshot, two slingshot rubber bands, and 233 slingshot steel balls in the vehicle. During questioning, the four people truthfully confessed to the criminal facts: the defendant Hou was responsible for driving his own white Great Wall pickup truck, license plate ×××; the defendants Guo and Wang were responsible for using a slingshot to shoot steel balls to hunt 21 wild animals; and the defendant Feng was responsible for retrieving the game. The National Forestry and Grassland Administration's Wildlife Testing Center was commissioned to conduct a species identification of the 21 game items involved in the case. The identification revealed that all 18 were Phasianidae Tibetan Snowcocks, and the other 3 were Phasianidae pheasants. After the incident, the defendant Guo reported and exposed the criminal behavior of others, which the investigative authorities verified as true. A case has been filed regarding these criminal behaviors, and compulsory measures have been taken against the criminal suspects.", "label": {"Guo": ["Detention"], "Hou": ["Detention"], "Feng": ["Detention"], "Wang": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that during January 2013 and the period from May to August 2013, the defendants Chen and Wu, together with Wu B, Wang, Yin, Zheng, Wu A, Ge (all handled in separate cases), and \"A\" (identity not verified), set up stalls multiple times near Donghu, the entrance of the small commodities market, and near Taizhou Hospital in the ancient city district of a certain city. They engaged in fraudulent gambling using a game called \"Wuliu\" or \"Tianfu\". During their participation, defendants Wu and Chen illegally gained approximately 9,000 yuan in total, with each receiving about 1,500 yuan from the illegal proceeds. \n\nOn March 3, 2014, defendants Chen and Wu voluntarily reported to the Xunqiao Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed their crimes. During the trial, defendants Chen and Wu each returned 1,500 yuan of illegal proceeds to this court. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Chen and Wu during the trial, and were corroborated by the statement of the victim Feng, the testimonies of witnesses Ding and Kang, the confessions of the co-perpetrators Wu B, Wang, Yin, Zheng, Wu A, and Ge, identification records, restitution receipts, the account of their surrender, and household registration certificates. The facts of this case are clear, and the evidence is indeed sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain area charges: On the evening of January 3, 2015, the defendant Xiao proposed to the defendant Chen to steal a certain Du, who was being fostered at the home of villager Xiao A in a certain village in a certain town, from the victim Huang. Chen agreed. At about 4 a.m. the next day, Xiao drove his moped, carrying Chen to the crime scene. Chen acted as a lookout, while Xiao climbed through a window into the house and stole Du. It has been appraised that this certain Du is valued at 3,980 yuan. It was further found that after the crime, the defendants Xiao and Chen had obtained the victim's understanding. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Xiao and Chen during the trial, and were confirmed by physical evidence; documentary evidence; witness testimony; victim statements; expert opinions, and the defendants' confessions, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charges that since 2014, defendant Zheng has illegally issued high-interest loans to individuals such as Zeng, Xie, Li A, Wei B, Li 11, and Hou. To forcibly collect debts, Zheng gathered Jiao, Hu 1, Ding, and others, using violence, threats, and other methods to engage in illegal detention, picking quarrels and provoking trouble, and forced transactions, behaving unlawfully, disrupting economic and social order, and resulting in a significant negative social impact, forming a gang known for evil activities.\n\n1. Facts of illegal detention and forced transactions:\nIn March 2013 and March 2014, defendant Zheng lent money to Zeng on multiple occasions. Later, when Zeng was unable to repay, he fled to avoid the debt. One afternoon in August 2015, Zheng and Hu 1 found Zeng at the parking lot of Dongfang Hawaii Bathing Center in a certain city and took him to Ruitong Trading Co., Ltd. in a certain county (hereinafter referred to as Ruitong Compan", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiao": ["Imprisonment"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was established that the defendants Chen and Huang were friends. Huang purchased 5 small packets of drugs from a certain place at a price of 65 yuan per packet. In order to earn some living expenses, the two decided to sell the aforementioned drugs. On the afternoon of March 19, 2015, around 16:00, the informant Zhang contacted Chen via QQ chat and agreed to buy four packets of \"pork\" (a code name for \"methamphetamine\") at a price of 200 yuan per packet. Subsequently, police arranged for Zhan (female) to call Chen and set up a drug transaction at the True Kung Fu restaurant at Gushu One Road, Gushu Huating, Xixiang Street, in a certain district of a certain city. At approximately 19:00 that day, Chen and Huang arrived at the agreed location to meet with Zhan. As they were preparing to make the transaction, the police apprehended Chen and Huang on the spot, and found five small packets of suspected drugs on Huang. Upon examination, the drugs sold by Chen and Huang were found to have a net weight of 3.76 grams, and all tested positive for methamphetamine. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Huang during the trial, and were corroborated by the relevant evidence subjected to cross-examination during the hearing, providing sufficient grounds for conviction.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of the First District of a certain city charges that: Between January and February 2016, the defendants Xie and Li conspired to commit theft. They subsequently broke into restaurants in a certain town of the city multiple times to steal mobile phones and cash, with the total amounting to 9,310 RMB. The specific criminal facts are as follows: \n\n1. At around 4 a.m. on January 17, 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Impression Chengdu Restaurant operated by the victim Hu on Dexi Road in a certain town, stealing 4,000 RMB and one HTC mobile phone (valued at 760 RMB), which they later sold. After the case was solved, the phone was recovered and returned to the victim, while the stolen money was not recovered.\n\n2. In the early morning one day in early February 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Jiaxing Restaurant operated by the victim Tan on Zhenxing North Road in a certain town, stealing 30 RMB. They also stole 50 RMB from an establishment operated by the victim Zhu in Heji. After the case was solved, the stolen money was not recovered.\n\n3. At around 3 a.m. on February 16, 2016, the defendants Xie and Li broke into the Hemei Kejia Restaurant operated by the victim Zhao on Nantan Road in a certain town of a city, stealing 2,300 RMB in cash and 9 mobile phones (valued at 2,170 RMB), which they later sold. After the case was solved, all phones were recovered and returned to the victims, while the stolen money was not recovered. \n\nOn February 28 of the same year, at around midnight, police officers apprehended the defendants Xie and Li at the Hengtian Internet Cafe in a certain town. After being brought to justice, Xie and Li truthfully confessed to the above facts. The defendants Xie and Li raised no objections during the court hearing, and the facts are substantiated by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, statements from the victim Chen, confessions and defenses from the defendants, expert opinions, as well as records of inspection, examination, identification, and audio-visual materials, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Xie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On the afternoon of May 4, 2013, defendants Feng and Zhang, after prior consultation, had Feng use QQ chat to arrange a meeting with victim Qian at a certain town. Feng then took Qian to a room at the Juyuan Inn, located at No. 133 Xixijie, in the town. During this time, defendant Feng exploited Qian's desire to engage in sexual activities by luring Qian to the bathroom to shower. Feng then took the opportunity to steal Qian's belongings left in the room: a white iPad 3 tablet (valued at 2,210 yuan, case valued at 34 yuan), a black Apple 4 phone (valued at 1,500 yuan), a white Sony H36L phone (valued at 3,840 yuan), and 1,100 yuan in cash. After succeeding, defendant Feng immediately fled the inn and met defendant Zhang at the Xitang Deyi Fort fast food restaurant, where he changed clothes provided by Zhang, and then returned to a rented room in Dacertain with Zhang. The stolen items were assessed to have a total value of 8,684 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of April 16, 2013, defendants Feng and Zhang, after prior consultation, had Feng use QQ chat to arrange a meeting with victim Yao at a certain town. Feng then brought Yao to a room at the Longfeng Hotel in the town. During this time, defendant Feng exploited Yao's desire to engage in sexual activities by luring Yao to the bathroom to shower. Feng then took the opportunity to steal Yao's belongings left in the room: a black Apple 4S phone (valued at 3,570 yuan) and over 700 yuan in cash. After succeeding, defe", "label": {"Feng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Rongshui Miao Autonomous County charged that on October 4, 2015, the defendant Ming provided the money and the defendant Lei used an identification card to register and check into room 508 at the Holiday Hotel in Rongshui Town, Rongshui Miao Autonomous County. They allowed drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin to stay in the room to use the drug methamphetamine together. At around 3 a.m. the next day, the defendants Ming and Lei, along with drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin, were apprehended by the Rongshui County Public Security personnel, and 2.64 grams of drugs were seized on-site. Upon evaluation, the aforementioned drugs tested positive for methamphetamine. Urine tests for methamphetamine-related substances showed that the urine of defendants Ming, Lei, and drug users Luo, Yu, and Qin all tested positive. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Ming": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged: On the afternoon of October 25, 2012, the defendants Zhu and Wei, along with others, went to the entrance of the Postal Savings Bank on Dongxing Road in Pingyao Town, Yuhang District, Hangzhou City. They first used fake gold ingots and golden Buddhas to attract the attention of the victim, Su, and then, on the pretext of pawning the fake gold ingots and gold Buddhas for travel expenses, deceived victim Su out of 19,700 RMB. After the incident, some of the stolen money was recovered and returned to the victim Su. Around 11 a.m. the next day, the defendants Zhu and Wei, along with others, went to a location near the Cultural Center Square in Yinong Town, a district in Hangzhou City, and used the same method to defraud the victim Huang of 1,000 RMB. Subsequently, when the defendants Zhu, Wei, and others used the same method to defraud the victim Shu near the farmers' market in Dangwan Town of a certain district, they were caught by the police on the spot.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Liujjiang County in a certain region charges that on May 19, 2015, at approximately 2:00 a.m., the defendants Shi, Wei, and Meng, after planning, drove a motorcycle from a certain city to a town near the Eastern Fourth Lane Market of Huayuan in a specific area. Wei and Meng were responsible for keeping watch, while Shi used tools to steal a Wuling small van with the license plate Gui B×××××, which belonged to the victim Qin, parked at that location. The stolen vehicle was then driven to an orchard on a hill in a village of a certain township to be hidden. The value of the stolen vehicle was 14,280 yuan. On May 21, 2015, the defendants Shi, Wei, and Meng were arrested, and the police lawfully seized the stolen Wuling small van involved in the case. After the case was solved, the stolen Wuling van was lawfully returned to the victim, Qin. Further investigation revealed that defendant Shi was previously convicted of x crime and was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison and fined 30,000 yuan by the People’s Court of Liunan District of a certain city on November 6, 2012. On December 28, 2014, the Intermediate People’s Court of a certain city ruled on parole with Criminal Ruling No. 7515, 2014, and Shi's parole period was from December 28, 2014, to November 22, 2016. The actual time served was two years, nine months, and six days, and the unserved time was one year, eleven months, and twenty-four days. The aforesaid facts were not disputed by the three defendants during the trial, and they were corroborated by evidence such as victim statements, defendant confessions, on-site investigation, identification records and photos, details of the case, household registration information, criminal judgments, criminal rulings, and the parole certificate, which are sufficient to ascertain these facts.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Meng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a Certain County Accuses: I. Zhang, Zhou, Chen Gather for Fighting and Qiu for Intentional Injury. On the night of September 12, 2017, defendant Zhang had a dispute over the phone with Ji (A), who was sentenced in another case, because he did not assist Zhang with an internet loan application. Mao (also handled in another case) called Ji (A) to question him, which led to an argument. Defendants Zhang, Mao, and Ji (A) agreed to bring people to a certain town in the county for a fight. Zhang and Mao then gathered defendants Zhou, Chen, Wang (under 16), Ji, Zhou (A), and Liu (B) (all three handled in separate cases) and prepared several machetes and other tools. They drove two cars from Fucheng Street in the county to a certain town. Ji (A) gathered defendants Qiu, Zhang (A) (under 16), Zhang (F) (handled in a separate case), and Zhang (C) (handled in another case), bringing two spears and machetes to wait at Open Avenue in the town. That evening, upon meeting, Mao instructed Zhou, Chen, and Ji to attack the other party with machetes and other tools. Ji (A) directed Qiu, Zhang (A), and others to attack the opposing side. Zhou insulted and hit Qiu in the face with a machete, while Qiu stabbed Zhou in the abdomen with a spear. Chen, Ji, Wang, and others inflicted machete injuries to Qiu's buttocks and waist. During the incident, Zhang witnessed the fight but did not intervene until after the consequences occurred. Ji (A) escaped the scene being chased by the op", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Qiu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial and investigation, it was found that during the day on April 29, 2015, defendant Ge had a dispute with Jiang (already sentenced) at Tianli Garment Co., Ltd. in a certain town of a certain city over work issues. At around 9:30 PM that evening, defendant Ge gathered defendant Zou, as well as Liu, Ran, and Li A (all already sentenced), while Jiang gathered defendants Zhang, Niu, Yang, and others at the Cross-Century Hualian Supermarket on the south side of the East-West Avenue in a certain town of a certain city for negotiations. As the negotiations failed, both parties engaged in a brawl using plastic pipes, wooden sticks, brooms, steel pipes, and other implements, leading to injuries to Li B and Zhang A. According to the forensic identification by the Judicial Identification Center of a certain city’s Public Security Bureau, the injuries to Li B's mouth and Zhang A's head were minor. The aforementioned criminal facts were undisputed by all five defendants during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as case registration forms, accomplice confessions, witness testimonies, identification records and photographs, forensic medical injury assessment reports, on-site investigation data, account of the incident, criminal judgments on accomplices, check of criminal backgrounds, and identification documents, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ge": ["Imprisonment"], "Zou": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Niu": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that around 3 a.m. on November 15, 2018, the defendant Li, upon invitation by his female friend Shen1, went with the defendant Lin to Room 111 on the first floor of \"Candy\" KTV on Wenguan Road, Chenghua Street, Chenghai District to drink and sing. During the gathering, defendant Guan became displeased because Li and Shen1 were sitting together chatting for a long time. Defendant Guan then gathered defendant Chen and Lin A (handled in a separate case) to the scene. Defendant Guan led defendant Chen and Lin A into the room, picked up an empty beer bottle from the table, and threw it at Li, subsequently beating Li, causing Li to suffer injuries and bleeding from the face. Lin, Shen1, and others intervened to dissuade them, at which point defendants Guan and Chen, among others, used broken beer bottle fragments to beat Lin, causing Lin to sustain injuries and bleeding on the arm. Defendants Guan and Chen then left the room. After the departure of Guan and his group, defendants Li and Lin, feeling indignant, picked up broken beer bottle fragments from the floor inside the room and rushed outside. Defendant Li attacked Chen, resulting in an injury to Chen's hand. Defendant Lin, holding a broken beer bottle fragment, hooked it around Guan's neck and dragged him to the entrance of \"Candy\" KTV. Li again rushed forward along with Lin to assault Guan, causing injuries and bleeding to Guan's head and arms. Security personnel later intervened to disperse them, with Guan and", "label": {"Guan": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Detention"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment"], "Li": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution agency charges that on May 17, 2016, at around 10:40 am, the defendants Tan and Qian discussed together at a certain store on Guoqing Road Pedestrian Street in this city and took advantage to steal one gold bracelet and one pair of sunglasses placed on the counter by the victim Chen. The total value amounted to 10,291.8 RMB. After being brought to justice, defendants Tan and Qian truthfully confessed their crimes. Tan and Qian have reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim Chen, fulfilled it, and obtained the victim's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Tan and Qian during the court trial. Additionally, the victim Chen's statement, testimonies from witness Chen A and others, the price appraisal conclusion, lists of seizures and returns, the evidence retrieval list, photos, the civil compensation agreement, the criminal judgment, the explanation of how the case was solved, and the household registration certificates serve as evidence, which is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Tan": ["Fine"], "Qian": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that around 16:00 on November 20, 2013, the Public Security Bureau's Security Division in a certain city discovered that someone was operating a casino using video game machines next to the Hangxin Hotel on Wuyi Road in the Jiangnan District of that city. The police then sealed off the casino and arrested Yang, who collected money for the casino, Li and Deng, who acted as lookouts for the casino, and Zhou, the casino manager. They also seized 27 baccarat gambling machines and one main machine used for gambling. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yang, Li, Deng, and Zhou during the trial. They were substantiated by evidence including the registration form for receiving the case, the decision to file a case, the process of arrest, the list of seized items and documents, the appraisal report of the video game machines, identification transcripts and photos of the identified persons, the criminal case scene identification transcript, photos of the identification scene, testimonies of witnesses Lu, Liang, and Huang, household registration certificates, explanations of the situation, and the confessions of defendants Yang, Li, Deng, and Zhou, which were sufficient for conviction. The defense lawyer for defendant Li had no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution and presented the following defense opinions: 1. Li played an auxiliary role in this case and should be given a lighter or reduced penalty according to the law; 2. Li had minimal malicious intent, was a first-time and occasional offender, had no prior criminal record, and confessed in court.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Deng": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged: In accordance with the national Mineral Resources Law and the unified requirements of the county's party committee and government, in March 2015, the people's government of a certain township in the county issued a special document to establish a leading group and a mining protection team. The purpose was to manage and protect the turquoise mines within the township, arranging personnel to patrol in shifts and stop illegal turquoise mining activities. From 9 AM on June 14 to 9 AM on June 15, 2015, at the arrangement of the township's government, the defendants Yu, Liang, among others, were on duty for mine protection at the Zu Family Courtyard in a village of the township. From 9 AM to noon on June 14, defendants Yu and Liang arrived at the mine area for duty. Around noon, they went to Xu's home in the village for lunch. After lunch, Xu suggested that defendants Yu, Liang, and Xu himself start playing mahjong for stakes, which continued from about 2 PM until around 3 AM on June 15. Afterwards, defendant Liang slept at Xu’s home, while defendant Yu went to sleep at an on-duty point in a certain gully. During this period, resident Zhu from a village in a certain town of the county gathered 15 people and secretly went to a mountain mining area in the township's village that night. Finding no one on duty at the mining protection point, they entered the mine and illegally extracted raw turquoise ore, which they later sold to Zhou for 650,000 yuan. This illegal mining incident led to a series of theft activities locally, causing, from June 15 to 17, a large number of uninformed villagers and idle people to gather at the mountain mining site in the village, forcibly conducting illegal mining. To protect the turquoise mine and control the situation, the township government of the county deployed several cadres, and the county public security bureau sent multiple police officers to protect the mine along with mining protection cadres and the public. During the protection process, a large number of illegal miners clashed with the police and mining protection personnel, resulting in three police officers being injured and several protection personnel being locked indoors for a long time, causing a severe social impact.", "label": {"Yu": [], "Liang": []}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charged: On December 4, 2013, the police arrested a drug user, Li Moumou (already punished), who expressed willingness to assist the police in capturing \"Biao Ge,\" who had supplied him with drugs. Li Moumou made a phone call (number 0755848××××2) to \"Biao Ge\" (phone number 136××××9369), pretending to purchase 100 yuan worth of heroin. They agreed to trade drugs near a vegetable field on XX Road in the Longdong Community, Longgang Street, District. At approximately 19:00 that evening, after successfully completing the transaction with defendant Qian at the agreed location, the ambushing police arrested defendant Qian, confiscating 100 yuan in drug money and a mobile phone from him. A small packet of heroin obtained from the transaction was extracted from Li Moumou (after appraisal, it weighed 0.06 grams and contained heroin ingredients). Defendant Qian confessed to the crime of drug trafficking, stating that he purchased the drugs from a man nicknamed \"Pangzi\" and his wife and resold them, and volunteered to assist in capturing \"Pangzi\" and his wife. Subsequently, Qian called \"Pangzi\" (number 183XXXX****), pretending to buy 640 yuan worth of heroin, and they agreed to trade drugs at XX No. XX Road, Longgang Street, District. At approximately 21:00 that evening, defendant Qian purchased heroin worth 640 yuan from \"Pangzi\"'s wife, defendant Xiang, at the agreed location. After the transaction was completed, defendant Xiang was arrested by the police. Two small packets of heroin purchased from defendant Xiang were extracted from defendant Qian (after appraisal, the total weight was 2.55 grams, and heroin ingredients were detected), and 640 yuan in drug money was confiscated from defendant Xiang.", "label": {"Qian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the charges by the public prosecution agency, on the afternoon of June 27, 2014, defendants Shu and Ceng took a ride in a car driven by Ning Jia (handled in a separate case) to a bus stop next to the China Construction Bank in the southern business district of a certain city. The two then separately carried out thefts. Defendant Shu stole a white Apple 4S phone (valued at 1,226 RMB) from the right pocket of victim Li's pants at the bus stop. Defendant Ceng stole a white Apple 5 phone (valued at 2,804 RMB) carried by victim He at the same bus stop. Subsequently, as defendants Shu and Ceng attempted to flee the scene, they were apprehended by members of the community security team from Zhonggongmiao Street in the district of the city and handed over to the public security authorities. The aforementioned stolen goods have all been recovered and returned to their owners. The facts above were admitted by defendants Shu and Ceng during the court hearing, corroborated by the statements of victims Li and He, the testimonies of witnesses Ning Jia, Ning Yi, Ning Bing, Zheng, and Bao, identification records of Shu and Ceng, photos of the phones, seizure documents, return receipts, Price Appraisal Conclusion No. 10339 (2014) issued by Yin Price, the account of their capture, explanatory notes, investigative reports, and identity information of the two defendants.", "label": {"Shu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ceng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused the defendants Yang and Chen of multiple instances, during the period from October to November 2014, of taking advantage of the times when the victim Xiao was out. They used a key to open the iron gate of Xiao's rented room on the second floor at No. 19, Third Street, Chengnan Station, Maonan District, Maoming City, to enter Xiao's home and commit theft. They stole one pressure cooker, an oval Guanyin jade pendant, one transformer, and 710 yuan in cash. On November 8, 2014, at around 16:00, Yang again attempted to steal from Xiao's rented room in the same manner and was discovered by Xiao's family members. Later that day, at approximately 22:00, Xiao reported to the police, and the police subsequently arrested Yang and Chen at the scene.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Prosecution's allegations: 1. On May 11, 2015, at around 10:00 am, the defendants Liu and Dong drove to the vicinity of the Liangtang Township Health Clinic. After parking the car, Liu entered the clinic premises to commit theft, while Dong waited outside. A few minutes later, Liu stole a Eureka-brand electric tricycle, which was parked in the clinic’s bike shed by Zhao, and Dong drove them away. An appraisal assessed the stolen electric tricycle's value at 4320 yuan. 2. On August 1, 2015, at around 10:20 am, the defendants Liu and Dong drove a silver-gray car with license plate number Lu A××××× to the front of Hongfuxing Beauty and Body Care Center in Donggucheng Town, Guan County. Dong first pried open the Jinpeng-brand electric tricycle parked by the victim Wang in front of the center, and Liu then rode it away, after which Dong drove them off in the car. An appraisal assessed the stolen electric tricycle's value at 2660 yuan. It was also found that during the trial, Liu's family compensated victim Zhao for the economic loss of 4320 yuan and compensated victim Wang for the economic loss of 2660 yuan, thus obtaining reconciliation. The above facts are undisputed by the defendants Liu and Dong during the court trial and are evidenced by witness testimonies, on-site inspection records, appraisal conclusions, arrest details, audiovisual materials, receipts, and the defendants' confessions, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that defendants Liang and Ou are a married couple. On May 7, 2014, at around 11 p.m., the two of them went to Baima Street in front of the Department Store on Xinjian Road, Jinchengjiang District, to search for a target. Liang noticed that the victim Hu's green-bordered black electric scooter of the Lvneng brand did not have its alarm activated, nor was the main lock or steering lock engaged. Liang then informed Ou of this. After discussing, Liang pointed out the parking location to Ou and gave Ou two keys for committing the crime. Ou proceeded to steal the vehicle and then sell it. The next day, the two were arrested at their home by the police. According to the valuation by the Hechi City Price Certification Center, the stolen vehicle's appraised value is 3,097 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Liang and Ou during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence such as the criminal case registration form, the arrest process account, victim Hu's statement, the crime scene identification records and photos, the receipt for the purchase of the electric scooter, the price evaluation report and conclusion notice from the Hechi City Price Certification Center, surveillance video discs and screenshots, the guilty confessions of defendants Liang and Ou, and their household registration records, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on August 3, 2015, at around 1 a.m., the defendants Chen, Zhang, and another Zhang, after premeditation, pretended to ride in the taxi driven by the victim He. While the car was driving to a lane near Front Jiazai, Ergezhai, 8 kilometers from the city, the three used knives to rob the victim. They robbed cash amounting to 268 RMB and a BBK V11 mobile phone. An appraisal determined that the value of the robbed mobile phone was 480 RMB. To prove the aforementioned criminal facts, the prosecution provided evidence including the victim's statement, the defendants' confession and defense, the crime scene identification records, the list of seized and returned items, photos of the stolen goods and tools used in the crime, the valuation appraisal conclusion of the involved items by Guiyang City Price Certification Center under Document No. (2015) 280, the defendants' household registration certificates, the arrest process, etc., to verify the constitution of the crime charged against the defendants and requested this court to punish them according to the law. Defendant Chen did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Defendant Zhang did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. Another defendant Zhang did not object to the charges and the criminal facts by the prosecution and pleaded guilty in court. The defense argued for leniency for defendant Zhang on the grounds that Zhang was a minor at the time of the crime, was a first-time and occasional offender, played a minor role in the joint crime and was an accomplice, and honestly confessed the crimes committed and pleaded guilty in court. After trial, it was found that at around 1 a.m. on August 3, 2015, the defendants Chen, Zhang, and Zhang, after premeditation, pretended to take a ride in the victim He’s ", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that, from the end of 2011 to the beginning of 2012, defendants Zhao and Chen, while being aware that the plastic particles and plastic films from Yang and others (all handled in separate cases) were stolen, repeatedly purchased them at prices lower than the market value and then resold them for profit, with the amount involved totaling 88,325 RMB. The specific criminal facts are as follows: 1. Around December 25, 2011, defendant Zhao, in collaboration with defendant Chen, purchased over 200 kilograms of plastic film from Yang and others, which was appraised at a value of 2,800 RMB, and then resold for profit. 2. Around January 15, 2012, defendant Zhao, together with defendant Chen, acquired more than 60 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were appraised at a value of 16,500 RMB, and then sold for profit. 3. Around January 30, 2012, defendant Zhao and defendant Chen bought over 20 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were appraised at a value of 5,500 RMB, and then resold for profit. 4. Around March 7, 2012, defendant Zhao and defendant Chen obtained 231 bags of plastic particles from Yang and others, which were valued at 63,525 RMB by appraisal, and then resold for profit. On November 21, 2013, defendants Zhao and Chen voluntarily returned the illicit gains amounting to 88,325 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhao and Chen during the trial, and are corroborated by evidence including the seizure list, the process of how the case was brought to light, the criminal judgment, testimonies from witness Yang, statements from victims Qi, Dong, Luo, and Ni, confessions and defenses from defendants Zhao and Chen, appraisal conclusion from the price certification center of the city where the items involved were located, and identification records, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that: On July 19, 2013, at approximately 8:40 PM, defendants Ren, Liang, and Jin went to the vacant lot opposite “Huamei Home Textiles” on a certain road in Xinqiao Street, a certain district, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Liu's unawareness, they snatched the gold necklace from his neck (appraised at 2,306 yuan) and fled the scene. On July 21, 2013, at around 7:00 PM, defendants Ren, Liang, and Gui went to the entrance of the Bank of China on Jinhong West Street, Xinqiao Street, a certain district, in a certain city. Taking advantage of the victim Sun's unawareness, they snatched the gold necklace from his neck (appraised at 2,511 yuan) and fled the scene. The aforementioned facts are undisputed by defendants Ren, Liang, Gui, and Jin during the court proceedings, and are substantiated by the statements of victims Liu and Sun, the testimony of witness Dai, identification records, price appraisal reports, invoices, criminal judgment documents, certificates of release upon completion of sentence, records of capture, identification materials, and other evidence, all of which are sufficient to confirm these facts.", "label": {"Ren": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Gui": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Jin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: Defendants Zhang and Chen participated in a theft gang organized by Zhang (still at large) and Wang (still at large), among others, to conspire to steal crude oil from an oil field. On July 5, 2016, at about 10:00 am, defendants Zhang and Chen, along with others, drove a car to a hotel in the county for accommodation. During this time, Chen, Zhang, Wang, and Wang went to a certain town and around 10:00 pm on the same day, drove a micro freight vehicle and a van to park them inside the county government compound. On July 6, at about 9:00 am, Zhang, Zhang, Chen, Li, and Wang drove to inspect and scout the area near an oil well in a village, while Wang went to contact and guide a large truck. At around 7:00 pm, Zhang drove a car carrying Zhang, Wang, Chen, and Li, and Wang drove in a green modified truck to the vicinity of the oil well. At around 10:00 pm, Zhang, Zhang, Wang, Chen, Li, Wang, alongside two drivers of the truck, carried out the theft by using their own oil pipes to connect to the production valve of the oil well, transferring the crude oil into the tank of the modified truck. After about two hours, when the tank was filled with crude oil, defendants Zhang and others fled the scene by car. While escaping, they spotted a patrolling police car, leading the defendants to abandon the car and the modified truck and flee. According to identification, the stolen crude oil amounted to a total of 23.12 tons, valued at 24,797 yuan. On July 21 of the same year, defendant Zhang was captured by public security organs, and on July 22, defendant Chen was also captured. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Chen during the court trial, and there are confessions and defenses from defendants Zhang and Chen, testimonies from witnesses Han, Liu, Wu, Wu, Yu, Chen, Xie, and Cui, a pricing conclusion report of items involved in the case, vehicle sale agreements, car rental contracts, records of arrest and seizure, photos of seized items, inquiries into vehicle and personnel information, criminal judgment documents, records of unlawful and criminal history inquiries, synchronized audio and video recordings of interrogations, household registration information, and other evidence, all sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain locality charged that in October 2015, the defendant Lin set up a micro-cosmetic studio in Room 605, Building 22, Maanchi New Village, in this district, offering beauty services such as wrinkle removal, face slimming, and fat dissolving. The defendant Zheng assisted in introducing and contacting customers and received a commission. On October 19 of the same year, the defendant Lin used numbing cream and Botox to inject customer Zhou for wrinkle removal and later collected 1,500 yuan (RMB, the same hereinafter), giving a referral fee of 300 yuan to the defendant Zheng. On October 28 of the same year, the defendant Lin used numbing cream and muscle inhibitors to inject customer Jiang for chin fat dissolving and later collected 1,500 yuan, giving a referral fee of 300 yuan to the defendant Zheng. At about 18:00 on October 29 of the same year, public security personnel inspected the above-mentioned studio and seized eight bottles of muscle inhibitors and one bottle of J-CAIN (numbing cream) on site. According to the determination of the Wenzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration, the external packaging of the seized drugs did not indicate the drug registration number, and all should be treated as fake drugs. It was also found that the defendant Lin was pregnant at the time of the trial; the defendant Zheng had suffered a miscarriage at the time of the trial. On April 22, 2016, the defendants Lin and Zheng respectively returned illegal proceeds of 2,400 yuan and 600 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the court hearing, and are substantiated by evidence such as muscle inhibitors, numbing cream, medicine instructions, photos of the medicines, the seizure list, identity documents, testimonies of witnesses Zhou and Jiang, the process of turning themselves in, the Wenzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration's drug determination document, the search record, the venue identification record, and the personnel identification record, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Lin": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from early November 2018 to November 14, 2018, the defendant Sha, while guarding a courtyard in a certain district of a certain town where the victim Li and others stored items, took advantage of being alone to conspire with defendant Pan to steal twice the \"Jiangxi Jiangte\" brand (YZTD200L3-4/8/24) three-phase asynchronous electric motors, one \"Certain Place Weifang\" brand (YD160L-8/4) three-phase asynchronous electric motor, one \"Mudanjiang\" tower crane (QTZ40) tower hook, and four lift attachments (SC200/200) from the courtyard on four separate occasions. After Pan sold the stolen goods, Sha received more than 1,700 yuan, and Pan received more than 1,000 yuan. According to the appraisal by the Price Certification Office of the Development and Reform Commission of a certain district, the stolen goods were valued at 11,299 yuan. On March 28, 2019, Pan turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of a certain district. On November 17, 2020, Sha and Pan compensated Li 12,000 yuan and received his forgiveness. Defendants Sha and Pan had no objections to the facts, charges, and sentencing recommendations and signed a statement to that effect, and they also had no objections during the trial.", "label": {"Sha": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that the defendant, Yan, was married to Jiao on September 23, 2000. The defendant, Zhuo, and Zhang held a wedding ceremony and began living together in 2009, eventually having a daughter. In 2013, defendants Yan and Zhuo became acquainted, fully aware of each other's marital status. From November 2013 until the discovery of the case, Yan and Zhuo lived together as a couple in two rented houses located in different villages in a certain town and district. During this period, on January 6, 2015, Zhuo gave birth to a baby boy at Zong Village Health Center, Xiaoji Town, a district. Yan and Zhuo were listed as the father and mother respectively on the baby's birth medical certificate. After the case came to light, Yan and Zhuo voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on December 31, 2015, and truthfully confessed their crimes. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Yan and Zhuo during the trial; they pleaded guilty voluntarily. The evidence presented includes testimonies from witnesses Ling, Xu, Li, Liu, and Wang provided by the prosecution; a statement from the victim, Jiao; the confessions and defenses of defendants Yan and Zhuo; two birth medical certificates; copies of marriage registration certificates; details of how the case was uncovered; and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the findings.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhuo": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Jiangdu District in a certain city of Jiangsu Province charges: Around midnight on February 3, 2016, defendants He and Han and victim Xia were drinking at the \"Mountain City Grilled Fish Restaurant\" in the Commercial City of Xianü Town, Jiangdu District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province. Defendant Han had an argument and scuffle with victim Xia. Defendant Han, holding a stool, and defendant He, holding an empty beer bottle, jointly assaulted victim Xia, causing injuries to Xia. According to the evaluation, victim Xia's bilateral nasal bone fractures were classified as minor injury of the second degree; the contusion of the scalp on the right occipital region and contusion of the soft tissue around the left eye were classified as minor injuries. After being brought to justice, defendant He truthfully confessed to the criminal facts; on February 3, 2016, defendant Han, after being notified by police over the phone, voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. During the trial, defendants He and Han reached and fulfilled an agreement on civil compensation with victim Xia, obtaining Xia's understanding. The above facts are not disputed by defendants He and Han during the court hearing and are supported by the statement records of victim Xia provided by the public prosecution agency in court; testimonies from witnesses Qi, Zhang, Deng, who did not appear in court; the confessions and defenses of defendants He and Han; identification records; forensic clinical evaluation report issued by the Judicial Appraisal Institute of the Jiangdu District People's Hospital in a certain city; mediation records, mediation agreement, and receipts; the circumstances of the arrest; and household registration certificates, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People’s Procuratorate of a certain place charged: At around 4 a.m. on January 6, 2014, after prior discussion, the defendants Zhou and Peng rode a moped driven by Peng to the sidewalk near the entrance of a certain street number in this city. Zhou used a lock-picking key to pry open the lock of the car parked by the victim Ruan at that location, with the license plate number XXDT** of a certain place. The two stole a Nokia Lumia 800 mobile phone (worth 678 RMB), 800 RMB in cash, and six bottles of Junling Tianxia business wine from the car interior and trunk before fleeing. Subsequently, Peng sold five of the stolen bottles of Junling Tianxia business wine to others and hid one 100ML bottle of Junling Tianxia business wine (worth 73 RMB) at home. After the defendants Zhou and Peng were apprehended, both truthfully confessed to the above criminal facts. The public prosecution agency determined that the actions of the defendants Zhou and Peng violated Articles x and x of the \"Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China\" and they should be held criminally responsible for joint crimes under the charge of x. The defendants Zhou and Peng both truthfully confessed their crimes, and according to Article x of the \"Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China,\" they may be given lenient punishment. It is recommended that both defendants be sentenced to less than ten months of imprisonment and fined. We hereby request legal judgment. The facts ascertained by our court through trial are the same as those charged by the public prosecution agency, and are supported by the following evidence: the victim Ruan's statement record, search record, list of seized items, list of extracted evidence, photos of stolen goods, invoices, vehicle information, surveillance video, price appraisal conclusion from the Shanghai Xuhui District Price Bureau, criminal judgment, decision of re-education through labor, certificate of release from re-education through labor, receipt of case report from Shanghai Public Security Bureau, case registration form, work situation, and the confessions of the defendants Zhou and Peng. This evidence has all been verified in court and is confirmed by our court.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that on September 5, 2013, the Wuxing District People's Court of a certain city rendered Civil Judgment No. 484 (2013) of a certain place, ordering Fei Xin, Zhang, and the defendants Qiu, Chen to jointly repay the principal, interest, and penalty interest of a loan totaling 644,274.42 yuan to the City Branch of the Bank of China Limited. It was determined that the City Branch of the Bank of China Limited shall have the right to preferential satisfaction from the proceeds of the mortgage, auction, or sale of the property owned by Qiu, Chen, located at Unit 405, Building 183, Bibo Park, Bilanghu Community, in a certain city, according to the order of mortgage registration. After the judgment came into effect, the case entered the enforcement procedure. Despite multiple requests from the Wuxing District People's Court of a certain city, based on Civil Judgment No. 484 (2013), for the two defendants to vacate Unit 405, Building 183, Bibo Park in this city, they refused to vacate the property. Subsequently, on May 8, 2014, the Wuxing District People's Court posted a notice at the door and hallway of the unit, requiring Qiu, Chen and their family to move out by November 8, 2014. As of the expiration date, Qiu and Chen, without legitimate reasons, still refused to vacate, resulting in the inability to enforce the court judgment. After the incident, Qiu and Chen fulfilled all their enforcement obligations. The aforementioned facts are not disputed by Qiu and Chen during the court hearing, and are supported by evidence such as basic information of permanent residents, investigation request to public security organs, enforcement status report, civil judgment, court announcement, case filing and management information form, application for compulsory enforcement, validity certificate of legal documents, case receipt notice, bulk registered mail list, enforcement notice, asset report order, civil ruling, enforcement ruling, notice board of the property in question, business license, marriage certificate, assistance enforcement notice, land registration inquiry results, basic information of the property certificate, and case closure certificate; as well as the arrest report issued by public security investigators, and the confessions and defenses of Qiu and Chen. This evidence sufficiently establishes the findings.", "label": {"Qiu": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was ascertained that: \n\n1. On the evening of November 26, 2014, defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu conspired in advance. Defendants Tao and Wu stole the \"Zhepinghu 00901\" ship, rented by Xuzhou Ronghe Construction Installation Engineering Co., Ltd., from the Taizhou Port dock site and sailed to the vicinity of the ancient Majiang River estuary. There, they met defendant Xu, who arrived by agreement on a small boat. Using manual labor and a crane, they stole 1.5 tons of channel steel and 2.05 tons of steel bars used for securing the channel steel from the \"Zhepinghu 00901\" ship, with a total value of 5,925 RMB.\n\n2. At around 1 a.m. on January 18, 2015, defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu conspired in advance near the ancient Majiang River estuary and stole 2.35 tons of channel steel and 2.1 tons of steel bars using the aforementioned methods, with a total value of 7,170 RMB. On January 19, 2015, defendants Tao and Wu were apprehended by the police. On the same day, defendant Xu turned himself in to the authorities. After the incident, defendants Tao and Wu returned 9,500 RMB in stolen funds, and defendant Xu returned 3,595 RMB in stolen funds.\n\nThese facts, which defendants Tao, Wu, and Xu did not dispute during the trial, are corroborated by witness testimonies from Du, Wang, Xu, Han, Huang, Xu (another person), identification records, weighbridge receipts, call logs, seizure orders, seizure lists, photographs, situation reports, appraisal opinions on item prices, case findings, and basic information on permanent residents, which are sufficient for an affirmation.", "label": {"Tao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it was found that at around 3 PM on May 4, 2013, Zhang and others had a dispute with someone over gambling near No. 68 Duxi Road, Duqiao Town, a certain city. During the escape, defendant Pan grabbed Zhang from behind and slammed him head-first into the ground. Subsequently, Yang and others used a plastic stool to beat Zhang, causing him injuries. According to the assessment, the victim Zhang suffered an epidural hematoma on the left occipital region without obvious neurological symptoms and signs; back injury resulted in fractures of the T8 and T10-12 vertebrae; the injuries to the left occipital region and back both constituted minor injuries. On May 7, 2013, the defendant Yang was arrested by the police. On June 8, 2013, the defendant Pan voluntarily turned himself in at the public security institution and truthfully confessed his crime. It was also found that after the incident, defendant Pan reached a mediation agreement with the victim Zhang, compensated Zhang's economic losses, and obtained Zhang's forgiveness. The above facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and were corroborated by documentary evidence including the two defendants' household registration certificates, case handling records, criminal judgment, public security administrative penalty decision, withdrawal of public security administrative penalty, people's mediation agreement, receipt, letter of forgiveness, investigation notes, statement of circumstances, testimonies of witnesses Wang, Bao XX, Wang A, and others, victim Zhang's statement, identification record, forensic medical injury evaluation certificate, on-site inspection records, site map and photos, audiovisual materials, and other evidence, which are sufficient to confirm.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A local People's Procuratorate accused the defendant Ye of knowing on June 10, 2013, that Zhu (already sentenced) intended to seek revenge after a conflict over trivial matters, yet still actively contacted the defendant Jiang, who then contacted Yang (handled in a separate case) to gather people. At 4:30 am that day, the individuals gathered by Yang followed Zhu and others into Shunyun Restaurant at XXX, Jiangning Road, in the city. Under Zhu's instruction, Yang and others used beer bottles and chairs to assault the victims Bao, Zhang A, Lu, Zhang B, and others, and smashed a 46-inch Skyworth LCD TV in the store. According to the appraisal, Bao suffered facial soft tissue injuries from external force, resulting in minor injury; Zhang A suffered a scalp contusion, resulting in minor injury; Lu suffered a subscalp hematoma, resulting in minor injury; Zhang B suffered a subscalp hematoma, resulting in minor injury. The smashed Skyworth LCD TV was valued at 3,770 RMB. On September 19, 2013, the defendant Ye turned himself in to the public security authorities and later compensated the victim Bao. On February 24, 2014, the defendant Jiang was summoned to the case by the public security authority, and then Jiang truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal facts. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial, and are confirmed by the statements of victim Bao and others, the testimonies of witnesses Shao, Gong, Zhou, Xu, and others, the injury notification, judicial appraisal opinion, mediation agreement, and criminal understanding document, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ye": ["Imprisonment"], "Jiang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that the defendants Chen and Wang were operating the \"Du Yi Wei\" fried dough shop in a town of a certain district in a certain city. They became dissatisfied because a peer, Zhang, had asked their landlord about rental prices and subsequently opened a shop with the same name near the \"Du Yi Wei\" fried dough shop operated by Wang's brother, X, in a village of the same town. The defendants Chen and Wang, feeling aggrieved, then plotted with Chen's brother-in-law, Gao (who is being dealt with in a separate case), to vandalize the shop to vent their anger. On June 3, 2015, at around 21:30, the defendant Chen, Gao, and others drove to the west side of Provincial Road 229 in the village of a certain town in a certain district where Zhang's \"Du Yi Wei\" fried dough shop is located. They used sticks to smash the shop's glass, air conditioning, and other items and assaulted Zhang and his family. After assessment, it was determined that the injuries of Zhang, Miao, and Qiao constituted minor injuries, and the total property damage was valued at 608 yuan. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Wang during the court trial and are corroborated by the testimonies of the victims Zhang, Miao, and Qiao, the on-site inspection records, identification records, expert opinions, medical certificates, related documentary evidence, household registration certificates, and records of their arrest, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A certain People's Procuratorate charges: On November 1, 2011, at approximately 17:00, drug purchaser Xu contacted the defendant Wei to agree on purchasing drugs from Wei at the price of 250 RMB per pack of \"K powder,\" near Tianjun Building in Luohu District of this city. Defendant Wei then drove with defendant Zhao to the aforementioned location. Defendant Wei wrapped a pack of \"K powder\" in a transparent plastic bag with a tissue while in the car and handed it to defendant Zhao, instructing Zhao to call over drug purchaser Xu, who was waiting not far away. Defendant Zhao opened the passenger side window and gestured for drug purchaser Xu to come over. Xu handed 550 RMB to Zhao, stating that 300 RMB of it was previously owed to defendant Wei. Defendant Wei then instructed defendant Zhao to hand over the tissue-wrapped \"K powder\" to drug purchaser Xu. The transaction was completed and both parties were immediately apprehended by the police. Police officers seized 550 RMB and three small packages of suspected drugs wrapped in tissue from defendant Zhao (upon testing, one small package was a white crystal weighing 2.37 grams, detected as ketamine; the other two small packages were white solids weighing 0.34 grams and 0.36 grams, both detected as cocaine), and one pack of \"K powder\" purchased by Xu was seized from him (upon testing, weighing 1.6 grams, detected as ketamine). To prove the above facts, the prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Physical evidence, documents: inventory of seized items, photos of involved drugs and drug funds, drug receipt, arrest process, explanatory statement, call records, defendants' identity documents; 2. Witness testimony: testimony of witness Xu; 3. Defendants' confessions and defenses: confessions and defenses of defendants Wei and Zhao; 4. Appraisal conclusion: inspection report from the Shenzhen Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center; 5. On-site investigation record and photos.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on June 23, 2015, defendants Luo and Tan rented an apartment located in Doumen District, Zhuhai City, a province. In the early morning of August 5 and August 13, 2015, Luo and Tan allowed drug user Yuan (handled separately) to use methamphetamine (××) at the aforementioned residence. At around 16:00 on August 23, 2015, Luo and Tan allowed drug users Yuan, Jiang (handled separately), and \"A\" (identity unknown, at large) to use methamphetamine at the aforementioned residence. After using drugs, \"A\" left. Luo, Tan, Yuan, and Jiang were caught on the spot by police officers, who discovered a homemade drug-smoking tool, a bong, and a bag of methamphetamine (white crystalline, with a net weight of 0.77 grams). On-site testing showed that the urine samples of Luo, Tan, Yuan, and Jiang all tested positive for ×× (MET). These facts are not disputed by defendants Luo and Tan during the trial, and are supported by evidence including the arrest process, residence information, case handling statement, administrative penalty decision, on-site testing report, copies of receipts and tenant registration form, photos of a rented house key, drug tool, and drugs involved in the case, seizure decision, search record, and inventory list, testimonies and identification records of witnesses Yuan, Jiang, and Huang, identification records of defendants Luo and Tan, on-site investigation record form, scene photos, and physicochemical test report, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Tan": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain area accused that on January 21, 2017, at around 8:00 AM, the defendant Shi urgently needed parts for a sponge cutting machine, so he contacted the defendant Li, an employee of Handan City Fuxing Shenjian Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. The two conspired to steal parts from the company. At about 8:00 PM that evening, the defendant Shi drove a Jetta car with the license plate D×××**, taking advantage of the absence of people, he and the defendant Li together stole the sponge cutting machine parts from the company's south and north workshops. After verification, the stolen parts included two lead screws, two pull rods, two cutting blocks, two belt pulleys, four couplings and guide wheels each, and six nylon rollers. According to the Handan City Fuxing District Price Evaluation Center, the stolen parts were valued at a total of 2,620 yuan. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusation.", "label": {"Shi": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Haizhou District, a certain city in Jiangsu Province, charges that: On the evening of August 26, 2015, at about 9 PM, defendants Zhang and Gu, together with Mao (to be handled in a separate case) and others, were gambling with the victim Hong Cong at Blue Ocean Hotel in Haizhou District of a certain city. After losing money, Zhang and others suspected that the victim Hong Cong was cheating, and forcibly took him to room 710 of Qianfu Grand Hotel in Haizhou District. In the hotel room, defendants Zhang, Gu, Mao, and others verbally abused, beat, threatened the victim Hong Cong, and forced him to hand over more than 5,000 yuan. Subsequently, defendants Zhang, Mao, and Xu (to be handled in a separate case) took Hong Cong near a certain place in a certain district of the city due to his reporting to the police, and beat him with a belt. They released him at about 2 AM the next day. An assessment confirmed that the victim Hong Cong sustained multiple soft tissue injuries, classified as minor injuries. On August 31, 2015, defendant Zhang turned himself in to the Public Security Bureau of Haizhou Branch in a certain city; On January 19, 2016, defendant Gu turned himself in to Donghai County Public Security Bureau. To substantiate its charges, the prosecution presented relevant documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and the defendants’ confessions to the court.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Gu": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that at around 6:00 PM on October 14, 2015, the defendant Yu sold suspected drugs, specifically five red pills known as \"Magu,\" to the drug user Cheng at the entrance of Day Tai Li No. 4 in Erlongtan Park, Qianchuan region, for 300 yuan. On the same day, the defendants Yu and Peng sold another five suspected red pills, known as \"Magu,\" to the drug user Cheng at the aforementioned location, also for 300 yuan. They were caught by police officers on the spot, who seized the five suspected pills Cheng had just purchased and another five he had bought previously from Yu. Additionally, 300 yuan of drug money was found on Peng. According to the appraisal by the Wuhan Public Security Bureau Drug Testing Center, the seized pills weighing 0.47 grams and 0.45 grams respectively were both identified as methamphetamine. The defendants Yu and Peng had no objection to the above facts during the trial. These facts are supported by evidence such as the seized drugs, the process of seizure, the list of confiscated items, the drug storage registration form, previous offense materials, witness Cheng’s testimony, the statements and defenses of defendants Yu and Peng, extraction records, identification records, and appraisal opinions, which are sufficient to be proven.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Peng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on December 6, 2018, at around 8:00 PM, the defendants Fu, Cao, Qi, Xu, and others were dining at the cafeteria of Linfeng Food Trading Co., Ltd. During this time, defendant Fu instigated defendants Cao, Qi, and Xu to vandalize the Zhenjiang Fenghuang Grain and Oil Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Fenghuang Grain and Oil), operated by Wei. At about 9:00 PM that night, defendant Cao drove Qi and Xu to Fenghuang Grain and Oil. After Qi and Xu climbed over the wall into the company, they used methods such as kicking and throwing bricks to vandalize the company's roller shutters and items inside the store. On their way past Zhenjiang Runxin Storage Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Runxin Storage), defendants Cao, Qi, Xu, and others used methods such as prying and throwing bricks to damage the company's electric gate, the windows and doors of the security room, and the rearview mirrors of vehicles in the yard. At around 11:00 PM that night, defendants Cao and Qi returned to Fenghuang Grain and Oil and continued to vandalize the company's items. According to the Zhenjiang Municipal Price Appraisal Center, the total price of the damages to Fenghuang Grain and Oil was 23,800 RMB, and the total price of the damages to Runxin Storage was 2,348 RMB. After the incident, defendants Fu and Qi voluntarily turned themselves in and truthfully confessed the aforementioned facts. Defendants Cao and Xu truthfully confessed the facts after being brought to justice.", "label": {"Fu": ["Imprisonment"], "Cao": ["Imprisonment"], "Qi": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "A People's Procuratorate in a certain location charges: At approximately 3 a.m. on July 12, 2013, defendants Xiao and Xiang apprehended the victim Yang at the entrance of the fruit market on Chenzhou East Street in Yuanling Town, Yuanling County. The two defendants, one on the left and one on the right, abducted Yang into an alley behind Jianshe East Street. During this process, Xiao threatened Yang by brandishing a butterfly knife, while Xiang issued verbal threats, demanding Yang hand over the money on his person. The defendants Xiao and Xiang robbed 231.5 yuan in cash and a Guoxing mobile phone from Yang. The stolen money was squandered by the two on drug use. During the trial process of this case, defendant Xiao has compensated the victim Yang a total of 878.5 yuan, which includes the cash and the value of the phone. The public prosecution agency recommends that the court sentence defendants Xiao and Xiang to imprisonment ranging from three to four years, and impose a fine, based on the criminal facts and circumstances of the defendants. Defendants Xiao and Xiang do not dispute the criminal facts charged by the public prosecution agency and have not raised any defensive opinion. Regarding the aforementioned charges, defendants Xiao and Xiang raised no objections during the court proceedings. Evidence provided included household registration certificates, on-site drug test results from urine samples, case registration forms, records of apprehension, inventory lists of seized items and documents, the criminal judgment (2001) Yuan Xing Chu Zi No. 169 from Yuanling County People's Court, the reeducation through labor decision (2007) No. 417 from Huaihua City Labor Reeducation Management Committee, and receipts; the victim Yang's statement; the confessions and defenses of defendants Xiao and Xiang; on-site inspection records and identification transcripts; as well as photographs of the crime scene and weapon—sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Xiao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xiang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that in May 2014, Wang (handled in a separate case) instructed defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng to travel from a certain city in a certain province to another province to distribute fake lottery tickets used to commit fraud. Wang promised to provide daily operational funds and remuneration to the three individuals, and to distribute a bonus after the business succeeded. Following Wang's instructions, defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng successively retrieved mailed fake lottery tickets from a courier company in a certain district, a city, Haishi district in a certain city, and another city district. They graded the fake lottery tickets, each placed them in black travel bags, and then went out separately to distribute them along the streets in the city. In June of the same year, victims Wu and Li, after picking up the fake lottery tickets, were defrauded of a total of 19,390 yuan under the pretense of needing to pay taxes and notarization fees after winning. During the trial, the three defendants returned the illicit funds of 19,390 yuan involved in the case and obtained the victims' Wu and Li's forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by defendants Liu, Dai, and Cheng during the court proceedings. Additionally, there is evidence to support these facts, including statements from victims Wu and Li, the registration form of the case, the account of the arrest, the seizure order, the inventory list, a set of photographs of physical evidence, a series of surveillance screenshot photos, a photocopy of the fake lottery ticket delivery receipt, proof of residence registration, and other supporting evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Dai": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that between March 9 and March 18, 2014, the defendants Yao, Wu, and Li jointly operated a casino at Wu's home, located at No. 35 Wudu Wuxun Road, Songyuan Street, in a certain county. It was used for gambling in the form of \"A8,\" from which they illicitly profited over 8,000 yuan.", "label": {"Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charged that on April 14 and 22, 2012, the defendant You, under the instigation of Sun (at large), conspired with others to steal a total of 90 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Zhejiang Dongbang Ship Repair and Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Dongbang Company), valued at 150,372 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Kailai Shipyard, after which he received a share of 100 RMB. During the period from January to February 2012, the defendant Li, under the instigation of Wu A (already sentenced), conspired with others on two occasions to steal a total of 72 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Dongbang Company, valued at 50,400 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Taiping Shipyard, after which he received a share of 300 RMB. During the period from September to October 2011, the defendant Wu, under the instigation of Wu A, conspired with others to steal a total of 31 barrels of various brands of marine anti-fouling paint from Dongbang Company, valued at 21,700 RMB in total, and then sold the stolen goods to Daishan County Taiping Shipyard, after which he received a share of 80 RMB. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants You, Li, and Wu during the trial, and were confirmed by the confessions of accomplices Han, Jiang, Wu A, Li A, Zhuang, Jin, Fang, Xu, Zhang, and He, the testimonies of witnesses Hou, Ren, and Wang, the price certification conclusion, the identification record, search record, list of seized items, photos of stolen goods made by Daishan County Public Security Bureau, the explanation of the arrest process, the Criminal Judgment No. 117 (2012) of a certain Criminal Division of this court, and the household registration certificates of the defendants You, Li, and Wu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"You": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Keqiao District of a certain city charges: 1. On the night of December 27, 2014, the defendant Hao allowed defendants Fu, Weng, and drug users Xia and Hu to use methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") in his rented apartment at Room 205, Building 21, \"Binhe Garden,\" Kexiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. 2. In the early morning of December 28, 2014, the defendant Fu allowed the defendant Weng and drug users Xia and Hu to use methamphetamine in his rented apartment at Room 203, Building 11, \"Xinjiang New Village,\" Keqiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. 3. On the night of December 30, 2014, the defendant Weng allowed defendant Fu and drug users Hu and Huang to use methamphetamine in Room 833 at the \"Loushanglou Hotel\" where he was staying, located on Keqiao Street, Keqiao District, a certain city. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Hao, Fu, and Weng during the court trial, and are evidenced by the house rental contracts, rental agreements, accommodation registration information, business licenses, explanatory notes, the process of apprehension, testimonies of Hu, Huang, Xia, Yu, and Zhou, as well as on-site test reports, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Hao": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Fu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Weng": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On September 13, 2016, defendant Ding, without obtaining a felling permit, sold 12 poplar trees planted in Team A of the Xiangyang Community in a certain town of a certain city to defendant Ma. Defendant Ma, also without obtaining a felling permit, arbitrarily cut down the aforementioned trees, with a standing timber volume of 10.0713 cubic meters. The charge asserts: Defendants Ding and Ma violated national forest protection regulations by arbitrarily cutting down trees in significant quantity without the approval and felling permit issued by the forestry administrative authorities or other authorized departments stipulated by law. Their actions constituted a violation of Article x and Article x of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and they should be held criminally responsible for x crime. Defendants Ding and Ma raised no objection to the criminal facts and charges by the prosecution. After the trial, it was ascertained: On September 13, 2016, defendant Ding, without obtaining a felling permit, sold 12 poplar trees he planted in the Shantang area and the eastern section of Longgou area in Team A of the Xiangyang Community, in a certain town of a certain city, to defendant Ma. Defendant Ma also without a felling permit, arbitrarily cut down the aforementioned trees. According to the appraisal by the Forestry Survey and Design Office of a certain city, the standing timber volume of the aforementioned felled Poplar B trees was 10.0713 cubic meters. On October 11 and 12, 2016, defendants Ma and Ding respectively voluntarily surrendered to the Forest Police Station of the Forest Public Security Bureau in a certain city and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. During the trial, defendants Ding and Ma also did not contest the aforementioned facts, which are supported by the testimonies of witnesses Feng, Luo, Geng, Wang, Fang, and Chen, the on-site inspection record, location diagram, on-site inspection photos, standard measurement calculation form, inspection location map, forest ownership certificate, a certain City Forestry Bureau certificate, appraisal opinion No. 9 (2016) by the Forestry Survey and Planning Design Office of a certain city, case registration form, the account of defendants Ding and Ma coming to the case, criminal record investigation materials, identification transcripts and photos of defendants Ding and Ma, confessions and defenses, and other evidence, sufficient to establish the judgment.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charged: At around 11 p.m. on December 27, 1999, defendants Zheng and Shao, along with friends Lang and Dai, went to a \"special flavor skewer shop\" near a company in a certain city to eat skewers. During this time, Zheng accidentally bumped into the arm of the victim Wang1 while going to the bathroom, leading to a quarrel between them. Subsequently, Zheng, in conjunction with Shao and Dai, assaulted Wang1 with punches and kicks within the company courtyard. Li, a friend of Wang1 who was with them, saw this and attempted to help Wang1. Seeing this, Lang stopped Li and restrained him, preventing him from going to Wang1's aid. After Wang1 fled from the beating, Zheng instructed Shao to chase and continue hitting Wang1. Outside the company, Shao caught up with Wang1, pulled him to the ground, and punched Wang1 in the head. According to the appraisal by the forensic identification center of the city's public security, the damage to Wang1's left occipital area, caused by a blunt object leading to a rupture of the dura mater, was assessed as serious injury. After the incident, defendant Zheng was summoned to the case, and defendant Shao voluntarily surrendered. To prove the aforementioned criminal facts, the prosecution questioned the defendants in court, read out the confessions of defendants Zheng and Shao made during the investigation, the statement of the victim Wang1, the testimonies of witnesses Lang, Dai, Wang2, and others, and presented doc", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Shao": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that on July 17, 2014, at approximately 13:00, defendants Li and Yu were drinking at the \"Yuhua Lamb Restaurant\" in a certain village of Dongcheng Street, Linqu County. Defendant Li, due to a trivial matter, smashed some beer bottles inside the restaurant and broke the glass on the right side of the restaurant's door. When police officers from the Dongcheng Police Station, Linqu County Public Security Bureau, arrived on the scene following a 110 command, defendants Li and Yu injured police officer Liu and auxiliary officer Gao, who were performing their duties. Subsequently, an assessment determined that the injuries of both officers constituted minor injuries. After the incident, defendants Li and Yu compensated victims Liu and Gao for the economic losses caused by their injuries, as well as the economic losses of victim Zhang, and received the victims' forgiveness. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants during the trial, and were supported by documentary evidence such as copies of people's police identifications, the Linqu County Public Security Bureau dispatch order, appraisal fee receipts, population information, phone records, the process of arrest, prior conviction records, letters of forgiveness, witness testimonies from individuals including Yang, statements from victims Zhang, Liu, and Gao, on-site inspection records and photos, and the minor injury assessment reports for victims Liu and Gao, all of which were sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city charged that on November 17, 2015, the defendants Wei, Hu, Wu, Ding, and others assaulted the victim Huang at a certain company in Ailian, Longcheng Street, a certain district, a certain city. Huang was identified as having sustained minor injuries of the second degree.", "label": {"Wei": ["Imprisonment"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ding": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial investigation, it has been found that starting mid-June 2015, the defendant Lou, at No. 61, a certain park in a certain town, illegally distributed and sold Mark Six lottery tickets for profit, organizing others to gamble on the lottery and taking an 11% commission from the bets. During this period, the defendant Lou accepted over thirty Mark Six lottery bets from the offender Chen, with a total bet amount exceeding 60,000 yuan. Lou reported this total amount to the defendant Zhang, who then reported more than 30,000 yuan of these bets to Geng (handled in a separate case). By the time the case was uncovered, the defendant Lou had earned over 600 yuan, and the defendant Zhang had earned more than 3,000 yuan. These facts were not disputed by the defendants Zhang and Lou during the trial. They are corroborated by the testimony of the witness Chen, inspection records, call records, criminal judgment records of prior offenses, details of the arrest, the confessions of the defendants Zhang and Lou, and personal identification documents — sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: At approximately 15:00 on October 8, 2014, the defendant Ben gathered defendants Su, Yang, and Ma in a district of a certain city in a certain province, and they rented a car with the license plate Lu Q×××××, driven by defendant Zhou. They went to a brick factory in Chenjia Village, a certain town in a certain city. They lured the factory's contractor Ji Mumu (also known as Chen Mouda) into the car, using the pretext that Ji Mumu had previously sold Ben, causing him losses that needed compensation. They threatened to report to the police or take Ji Mumu back to a certain place for handling. Through knife threats and physical assault, they extorted compensation of 60,000 RMB from Ji Mumu. At around 1:00 the next day, Ben, Su, Yang, Ma, and Zhou were arrested at a place on the highway at kilometer marker 470 while waiting to receive the compensation money. To support the charges for the above facts, the prosecution provided the court with evidence including case initiation and resolution records, the defendants' confessions and defenses, witness testimony, the victim's statement, relevant documentary evidence, physical evidence, and household registration certificates.", "label": {"Ben": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate in a certain location charged that starting from July 2014, the defendant He, in collaboration with the defendant Huang, began selling drugs in the vicinity of ** Street, ** New District in Zhongkai **. He purchased methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\") from Luo and delivered it, while Huang was responsible for finding supply sources and sometimes delivering with He. After purchasing drugs, He and Huang used some for their own consumption and sold some to individuals like Ling at prices ranging from 150 to 200 yuan, thereby making a profit. At around 22:00 on November 17, 2014, public security personnel apprehended He in the process of selling drugs on Yongning Street, Chenjiang, in the High-tech District of Zhongkai, and seized two packages of suspicious drugs on him (after testing, the total net weight was 1.93 grams, both containing methamphetamine). Subsequently, the police apprehended Huang at the Xingkai Traffic Police Team's Dormitory, room 505. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above facts.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found: 1. On the afternoon of December 25, 2015, the defendants Wu and Zhang, having premeditated, used sleight of hand to steal a coat valued at 2,988 RMB from the Metersbonwe counter on the second floor of a mall in Yangshe Town, a certain city. After the incident, the stolen goods were recovered and returned to the victim. 2. On the afternoon of January 24, 2016, the defendants Wu and Zhang, after premeditating, attempted to commit theft at the Weiku counter on the second floor of the same mall in Yangshe Town, but failed as they were discovered. The defendants Wu and Zhang committed two acts of theft, with the goods valued at 2,988 RMB. After Wu was apprehended, he truthfully confessed the aforementioned criminal facts. Both defendants Wu and Zhang are hearing-impaired. The above facts were undisputed by defendants Wu and Zhang during the trial, and are corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhou, Tang, and Wang; identification records; photos; search records; seizure lists; return lists; evidence retrieval lists; purchase receipts; disability certificates; audiovisual material descriptions; surveillance footage; price verification reports; incident documentation; arrest records; the confessions of the defendants Wu and Zhang; the decision not to impose administrative penalties; population information; and basic permanent resident information, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts, which this court confirms.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that starting in 2014, defendants Zhou and Su produced and sold bulk fish gelatin containing borax at stall number S143 located at 2546A, Shanzi Market, Chancheng District, in a certain city. On November 12, 2015, the Food and Drug Administration of Chancheng District conducted a sampling inspection of the bulk fish gelatin produced and sold at the aforementioned stall, finding a borax content of 877 mg/kg in the fish gelatin (the standard being non-detectable levels). On January 6, 2016, police summoned the two defendants to the public security bureau for investigation at the aforementioned stall. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhou and Su during the court hearing, and were supported by the testimony of witness Chen, identification photographs, individual household business records, rental contract, Shanzi Market food and edible agricultural products safety operation responsibility documents, on-site inspection records provided by the Chancheng District Food and Drug Administration, national food safety sampling inspection forms, appraisal report, the process of arrest, search records, seizure list, business license, video materials, household registration certificates, as well as the confessions and identification photos of defendants Zhou and Su during the investigation stage, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhou": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Su": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that around 11:00 a.m. on January 16, 2016, the defendant Li had a dispute over trivial matters with her sister-in-law, Yan, at the storefront XX, Building XX, Zhuchen Building Materials Market, Luozhuang District, Linyi City. Defendant Li called her niece, Wang, to the scene. Defendant Wang first pushed the victim, Yan, to the ground, after which Li kicked and punched Yan, resulting in soft tissue contusions on Yan's back and waist, and a fracture on the right side of the second lumbar vertebra. According to the assessment, the victim Yan's injuries were categorized as minor injuries, Grade 2. The prosecution submitted to the court evidence including the assessment opinion, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and statements from the victim Yan, as well as confessions from defendants Li and Wang.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a Certain Banner, Tumote Youqi charges: 1. In March 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han, in collusion with defendant Wang (the two are married), sold eight pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 1 at a price of over 400 yuan per pound. Yang 1 paid Han and Wang over 3000 yuan for the drugs. 2. In May 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han sold one pound of the drug Anarco to Yang 2 at a price of 600 yuan per pound. Yang 2 paid Han 600 yuan for the drugs. 3. On October 19, 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han, together with defendant Wang, sold ten pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 1. 4. On October 20, 2020, at the home of defendant Han in a certain city and banner, defendant Han sold eight pounds of the drug Anarco to Yang 2 at a price of 600 yuan per pound. Yang 2 paid Han 4800 yuan for the drugs. The People's Procuratorate of a Certain Banner, Tumote Youqi, has submitted to this court the relevant evidence materials accusing defendants Han and Wang of committing the crime of X as follows: 1. Seizure list and list of seized items documents; 2. Seizure decision, proof of no criminal record, arrest process, explanatory note, household registration information, permanent resident information; 3. Witness testimony from Yang 1 and Yang 2; 4. Confessions and defenses of defendants Han and Wang; 5. Search, seizure, and identification records; 6. Physical and chemical examination report; 7. Nine CDs.", "label": {"Han": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Shenzhen City charged that, starting from May 2014, the defendant Luo rented the electrical machine room of the parking lot on the first floor of a certain hotel in this district through Zhang, the property manager of the hotel, to operate a gambling den using the \"San Gong\" poker game format. The defendant Xu was employed by Luo to collect \"water money\" at the gambling den, while the defendant Yang provided loans there. At approximately 3:30 a.m. on August 15, 2014, police officers conducted an inspection of the electrical machine room in the parking lot on the first floor of the hotel, arresting defendants Luo, Xu, and Yang at the scene, along with 22 gamblers including He Mohu. They seized gambling money amounting to 52,190 RMB, 1,000 HKD, and a set of poker cards used as gambling tools. Additionally, 3,000 RMB of \"water money\" collected that day was found on defendant Luo.", "label": {"Luo": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was found that starting from December 2014, the defendant Yin was illegally receiving bets on underground lottery (\"liuhecai\") near the Martyr Cemetery and Huayuanjiang Community in Hecheng Street, a certain county, for over a month, approximately 10 sessions, totaling over 7,000 RMB. Beginning in February 2015, the defendant Yin, in conjunction with the defendant Zheng, illegally accepted other people's bets on the underground lottery. According to the arrangement, defendant Yin acted as the bookmaker, while defendant Zheng was responsible for collecting the bets in the storage room of his house or in nearby game rooms in Shengzhi Community, Building 2, Unit 1, Hecheng Street, a certain county. Defendant Zheng could take a commission of 4 RMB for every 100 RMB of bets collected. By May 19, 2015, when the public security authorities apprehended them, defendants Yin and Zheng had been accepting underground lottery bets for more than three months, covering about 40 sessions, and collecting a total of over 30,000 RMB. On May 19, 2015, defendant Zheng was apprehended by public security on the spot, and on June 30, 2015, defendant Yin turned himself in to the authorities. Both defendants truthfully confessed their criminal activities. These facts were not disputed by defendants Yin and Zheng during the trial process. The facts have been substantiated by the evidence presented by the prosecution, which was verified and cross-examined during the trial. This includes the Decision on Evidence Preservation No. 127 [2015] by Qing Public Notary, 1,270 RMB in cash, 19 booklets of underground lottery promotional materials, one 2015 Zodiac Code table, two sheets of betting records, population information inquiry forms for defendants Yin and Zheng, administrative penalty decisions Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 10 [2015] by Qing Public Security in a certain location, receipts for fines and confiscations by a certain provincial agency in Zhejiang, documents detailing the arrest process, witness testimonies from Ye, Cheng, Luo, Wang, Tao, confessions and defenses by defendants Yin and Zheng, identification records, Inspection Certificate No. 64 [2015] by Qing Public Security, the inspection transcript, and on-site photographs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from February to March 2016, the defendants Qian and Wang, along with Li A (separately prosecuted) and others, opened a casino in various towns of a certain county. They organized gambling activities using the \"Four-Character Treasure\" method to gather people for gambling, from which they collected profits. The defendants Qian and Wang collected more than 59,000 yuan in profits. The prosecution presented evidence including: household registration certificates, descriptions of how the defendants were brought to justice, receipts for returned illicit funds, testimonies from witnesses Li, Jin, Sun, Zheng, Li 2, Du, Li 3, Xu, Wang 2, Wang 3, Zhang, Chen, Li 4, Wang 4, Tang, as well as the confessions of the defendants Qian and Wang, and identification records.", "label": {"Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found: On February 24, 2019, at around 9 PM, Yan (already sentenced) purchased drugs from the defendant Yang. The defendant Yang then contacted the defendant Bo to purchase drugs. Bo obtained approximately 0.8 grams of the drug methamphetamine (\"ice\") from another person and sold it to Yang for RMB 1200 in a certain district of a certain city. Yang then resold the aforementioned drugs to Yan for RMB 1400. These facts were not disputed by the defendant Yang during the court trial, and they are sufficiently proven by the testimonies of witnesses Yan and Liu, documentation provided by the public security authorities, evidence of arrest, identification records, identity information, the criminal judgment, and WeChat transfer record screenshots.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Bo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 14:00 on March 27, 2014, on the west side of Building 93 in Yuntao Community, Huantai County, the defendant Tian gathered defendants Shi and Zong to assault the victim Gao, who had come to help Zhou request repayment of a debt. Defendants Shi and Zong punched and kicked the victim Gao, resulting in injuries to Gao's head and face. According to the evaluation, the victim Gao's injuries were classified as minor injuries (Level 2). It was also found that defendants Shi, Zong, and Tian reached a civil settlement agreement with the victim and fulfilled their obligations under the agreement. The defendants raised no objections to the facts during the court trial, and these facts were corroborated by the victim Gao's statement; testimonies from witnesses such as Zhou; documentary evidence including household registration proof, case registration form, civil settlement agreement, and receipt; and the forensic medical evaluation report on the degree of bodily injury, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Shi": ["Imprisonment"], "Zong": ["Imprisonment"], "Tian": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that at around 18:00 on February 2, 2015, defendants Xu and Yu, a married couple, and victims Zhong A and Zhong B, another married couple, were setting up stalls to sell pancakes at the entrance of \"Jiajiale Supermarket\" in a certain city. A verbal dispute arose between the parties due to business competition, which led to a physical altercation. During the altercation, defendant Xu took a kitchen knife from their mobile cart and injured the head of victim Zhong B with it, after which she was pulled away. Defendant Yu, having been injured on his left brow arch by Zhong A who used tongs, then took a kitchen knife from their cart. Upon seeing this, Zhong A dropped the tongs and fled into the supermarket. Defendants Yu and Xu each wielded a kitchen knife and chased after him. Subsequently, at the entrance of the supermarket, both defendants injured Zhong A on the head and legs. After leaving the supermarket, the two defendants spotted victim Zhong B by the roadside, chased him, and inflicted injuries on his arm and other parts before leaving the scene. According to the forensic evaluation, both victims Zhong A and Zhong B suffered minor injuries of the second degree. Following the incident, defendants Yu and Xu were subsequently summoned by the public security authorities. During the trial, with the court's mediation, an agreement was reached between the parties regarding civil compensation. The defendants fully honored their compensation obligations, and both victims expressed understanding towards the defendants. Defendants Yu and Xu raised no objections to the above facts during the trial, pleaded guilty, and the evidence presented, including photos of the kitchen knives and other physical evidence, hospital records, accounts of the apprehension, household registration certificates, testimonies from witnesses Xie and Tong, statements from the two victims, confessions and defenses from the two defendants, forensic medical injury assessment reports, inspection and identification records, and audio-visual materials, all adequately prove the time, place, cause, method, harmful consequences, and subsequent actions of defendants Yu and Xu's intentional infliction of injury upon others. The relevant evidence materials, after being examined in court, were found to be objective and truthful, originated legally, and can be used as the basis for the verdict.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges: Starting from September 2015, defendants Liang and Li, in collusion with Li A (handled in a separate case), accepted bets on the \"Mark Six\" lottery at Room 205, No. 6 Xingye Street, Minzhong Town, Zhongshan City. Li was responsible for issuing receipts and collecting money from bettors, while Liang was responsible for accounting and compiling betting situations, and later transferring the bet funds to Li A. At about 8 PM on March 8, 2016, public security personnel apprehended Liang and Li at the aforementioned Room 205 and confiscated RMB 5,180, which was the amount bet that evening, as well as mobile phones and tickets used for betting on the \"Mark Six\" lottery. Subsequently, public security personnel seized lottery betting tickets, notebooks, and other items from Liang's residence at No. 18 Xiongdi Street, Minzhong Town. Upon evaluating the seized tickets, it was determined that Liang and Li had received a total bet amount of RMB 138,123 from others betting on the \"Mark Six\" lottery. After being brought to justice, Liang and Li truthfully confessed to the aforementioned facts. The defendants Liang and Li raised no objections to the aforementioned facts during the court trial, and the facts are supported by physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimonies, confessions and defenses of the defendants, examination records, inspection records, identification records, and audiovisual materials, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "According to the prosecution, on June 15, 2019, the defendant Zhang, under the subcontract of Gansu Debao Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., undertook the construction project of the Huimin Breeding Cooperative in Hanjiachao Village, a town in a certain county. The defendant Yang was the head of the Huining branch of Gansu Debao Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. At around 18:00 on July 2, 2019, defendant Zhang led workers to carry out construction at the site of the Huimin Breeding Cooperative in Hanjiachao Village, a town in a certain county. Due to the lack of on-site management personnel and absence of any safety precautions, earthwork was conducted on the outer side even though the silage pool wall had been laid but not yet cured or stabilized. This led to the collapse of the wall, burying workers such as Chai Moumou and Zhang A on the inner side, and injuring Xi Mou. Despite rescue efforts, Chai Moumou and Zhang A died.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of Jiangsu Province charges: Defendants Xu and Qian conspired to illegally obtain electricity by modifying the electricity meter at Qian's residence located at No. 424, Group 2, Village XX, Chengxi Street, a certain district, a certain city. Defendant Xu provided Defendant Qian with the contact information of the personnel who would modify the meter. Subsequently, on November 15, 2012, Defendant Qian had the aforementioned personnel (identity unknown) modify the electricity meter at his residence and proceeded to steal electricity. According to the assessment, the error rate of the modified electricity meter was -91.758%. By September 10, 2019, Defendants Xu and Qian had stolen a total of 39,797.07 RMB in electricity fees through the aforementioned method. After being brought to justice, Defendant Qian fulfilled all restitution responsibilities. After committing the crime, Defendant Xu voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed to his crime.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Qian": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city of a certain province charged that on the evening of September 10, 2013, at around 6 PM, defendants Lv and Du purchased a large package of white crystalline powder for 1,000 RMB in a certain district of a certain city. At around 8 PM that evening, near the west gate of neighborhood 119 on Ganghua Village Street in the same district, defendants Lv and Du sold a small package of the white crystalline powder to an individual named Liu for 100 RMB. They were apprehended on the spot by police officers, and another large package of white crystalline powder was seized from defendant Lv. According to the appraisal, the small package of white crystalline powder sold was identified as the drug ketamine, with a net weight of 0.82 grams; the large package of white crystalline powder seized was also identified as the drug ketamine, with a net weight of 22.07 grams. All the aforementioned drugs were confiscated. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Lv and Du during the trial proceedings. Additionally, there is corroborating evidence, including the police agency's case-solving and arrest accounts, case handling statements, seizure decisions, seizure lists, and photographs, the narcotics handover registration form submitted by the provincial public security agency, identification materials of the defendants, witness testimony from Liu, and the drug test identification report issued by the Municipal Public Security Bureau's Drug Testing Center, all of which fully substantiate the case.", "label": {"Lv": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Du": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that the defendant Liu, in order to recover a substantial debt from Wang Yib, which Wang Yib admitted amounted to 162,000 yuan owed to Liu, conspired with the defendant Wei and others on the afternoon of May 25, 2014, to detain Wang Yib from a train station in Hefei, a province, to his residence in a certain town. He was detained until around 7 p.m. the next day when he was sent back by others. During this period, the defendants Liu and Wei assaulted Wang Yib, causing rib fractures and superficial injuries, which were medically assessed as minor injuries of the second degree. On September 15, 2014, at around 12 p.m., the defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered to the Chahe Police Station of the Municipal Public Security Bureau. After being criminally detained, he proactively wrote letters encouraging his accomplices to surrender. On September 26 of the same year, the defendant Wei voluntarily turned himself in to the public security authorities after receiving Liu’s letter of persuasion. During the trial, the parties voluntarily reached a mediation agreement in which the defendant Liu agreed to forfeit all claims against Wang Yib and, together with Wei, compensated Wang Yib for various economic losses totaling 70,000 yuan. Wang Yib and his family forgave the actions of the defendants Liu, Wei, and others involved and waived their right to pursue criminal responsibility against them. During the trial proceedings, neither the defendants nor their defense lawyers contested the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. The defense argued that the defendant Liu voluntarily surrendered, truthfully confessed the main facts of the crime, amounting to voluntary surrender; after his return, he persuaded his accomplices to surrender, which demonstrates meritorious behavior. They suggested that the court should give a lenient punishment. These facts were also undisputed by the defendants Liu and Wei during the trial, and were substantiated by the testimonies of witnesses Zu Mou, Wang Jia, Lu Moumou, Han Mou, among others, the victim Wang Yib's statement, identification records, defendant Liu’s letter persuading accomplices to surrender, the mediation agreement, the letter of forgiveness, receipts for compensation, evidence of the defendants' age of criminal responsibility, as well as the investigation and case handling process, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wei": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in December 2020, the defendants Wu and Xu, while working at Li's sand quarry in the Shibaozi development area of Huating City, discovered eight steel plates inside the factory building of Xinghua Smelting Company. After planning, the two stole the eight steel plates at around 1 a.m. on December 10. They rented a flatbed truck from Li to transport the stolen steel plates to Ma's scrap purchase station in a certain town of a certain city for sale. Ma paid Wu 11,000 yuan in cash. The Huating City Price Appraisal Center determined the value of the stolen steel plates to be 19,624 yuan. On December 25, 2020, Wang, a security guard at Xinghua Smelting Company, discovered the steel plates had been stolen and reported it to 110. During an inquiry, defendant Xu voluntarily confessed to the crime, and all the stolen steel plates were recovered and returned to the victimized unit. The prosecution presented the following evidence: 1. Documentary evidence: registration form for police case handling, seizure records and return list, receipts, explanatory notes, household registration certificate; 2. Testimonies of witnesses Wang, Li, Ma, Wu, another Wang, and another Li; 3. Statement from the victim, Zhu; 4. Confessions and defenses of the defendants; 5. Price determination certificate from the Huating City Price Appraisal Center; 6. On-site inspection records, identification records, extraction records, identification appraisal records, and photographs to substantiate the case.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charges that on May 10, 2019, at around 8:00 PM, after defendants Tian and He had been drinking with others, Defendant He, knowing that Defendant Tian had consumed alcohol, handed over the XXX Mitsubishi small ordinary passenger vehicle that He had driven to the location to Defendant Tian to drive. While traveling north along County Road 471 to the intersection of a village in a certain area, they were caught on the spot by traffic police. On May 12, 2019, it was determined by a judicial appraisal office in a certain city that Defendant Tian's blood alcohol concentration was 157.41 mg/100 ml, constituting driving under the influence of alcohol.", "label": {"Tian": ["Detention", "Fine"], "He": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon investigation, it has been found that defendants Wu and Ji, during their subcontracting of the steel reinforcement works for the Jiangguang Expressway expansion project, believed that the project supervision by Jiangsu Runtong Project Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Runtong Company) deliberately made things difficult multiple times during the construction process. Therefore, at about 22:00 on January 19, 2016, they went to the supervisory office of the company located in a certain town, district, city, and had a verbal dispute with the supervisor in charge, Yang. Defendant Wu first splashed tea on Yang's face, then defendant Ji slapped Yang several times and held him down. Seizing the opportunity, defendant Wu approached and punched Yang on the head and face, and whipped him with a belt. During the assault on Yang, another project supervisor, Zhang, was also punched in the head and face by defendant Ji, and later whipped and beaten with a broom handle by defendant", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ji": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the evening of October 27, 2013, defendants Zheng and Yang, among others, had a dispute with the victim Feng, which led to a fight. Later, Yang went to the Shilou County People's Hospital for bandaging due to injuries. At around 11 p.m. that same evening, Yang, Zheng, and others found Feng at Zhang’s tire repair shop, resulting in another dispute. Subsequently, Yang injured Feng's leg, while Zheng stabbed Feng in the left buttock and abdomen with a folding knife. According to the assessment by the Shilou County Public Security Forensic Identification Center, Feng's injuries were classified as serious.", "label": {"Zheng": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged that at around 7 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one gray-yellow dog belonging to Feng, weighing 15 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 120 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 9 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one brown dog belonging to Yang, weighing 26 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 208 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 9 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one black-yellow dog belonging to Wu, weighing 16 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 128 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. At around 10 am on December 7, 2013, the defendants Liu and Sun drove a gray van near a village in a certain town of a certain city and used a dog-catching snare to steal one yellow dog belonging to Liu A, weighing 24 pounds, which was assessed to be worth 192 yuan, and the stolen property has been recovered and returned. In support of the above allegations, the prosecution provided evidence including the confessions of the defendants Liu and Sun at the public security agency, the statements of the victims Feng, Yang, Wu, and Liu A, the testimony of witness Hao, the list of items seized and returned by the public security agency, the arrest process by the public security agency, the appraisal report on the value of the involved assets, the explanation of case handling by the public security bureau of a certain city, the defendants' household registration information, among other evidence, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial and verification, it was determined that around 3 PM on February 21, 2014, the defendants Zhan and Xiong were involved in a medical dispute with the Wuhan Huangpi District Maternal and Child Health Hospital due to the death of Zhan’s wife, Guo, after childbirth. Subsequently, they smashed property inside the hospital, including a \"Lenovo\" desktop monitor, a \"Minolta 7616V\" copier, wooden chairs in the conference room, wooden doors, guidance desks, newspaper racks, plastic-steel windows, and a health cabin. According to the appraisal by the Price Cost Investigation and Monitoring Sub-bureau of Wuhan Huangpi District, the value of the damaged items is estimated to be 6,036 RMB. After the incident, the defendant Zhan compensated the hospital for economic losses amounting to 2,000 RMB and received understanding. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Zhan and Xiong during the court hearings and were corroborated by the report materials from the Wuhan Huangpi District Maternal and Child Health Hospital and the testimony of Hospital Director Li; witness testimonies from individuals including Xiong Jia, Wu, Du, Liu, Li, Cheng, Xiao, Zhang, Liu Jia, Zhang Jia, Deng, Chen, and Qiu; proof materials from the public security organs, incident reports, arrest records, related surveillance photos and audio-visual materials, discs, case explanations; price appraisal conclusions by the Wuhan Huangpi District Price Bureau; mediation agreement, receipts, and letter of understanding; as well as confessions from defendants Zhan and Xiong. This evidence is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhan": ["Fine"], "Xiong": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On the night of October 22, 2020, the defendants Wu and Lai, along with others, were eating and drinking at a farm in a village in a district of a certain city. Despite knowing that defendant Wu had consumed alcohol, defendant Lai still allowed Wu to drive a small car with the license plate B×××** registered under Lai's name. When Wu was driving this vehicle with Lai and others along Huanshi East Road, Jiangpu Street, in a district of the city, they were caught on the spot by the on-duty police officers. Upon examination, defendant Wu's blood alcohol content was found to be 143.9mg/100mL.", "label": {"Wu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Lai": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in February 2013, defendant Ke began illegally operating a lottery business and had defendant Pan introduce new clients to him. Defendant Pan introduced defendant Zhu to defendant Ke. Subsequently, defendant Zhu placed his own bets and those of others with defendant Ke. Defendant Ke returned 12% of the bet amount to defendant Zhu as commission, while defendant Zhu returned 10% of the bet amount to the bettors. Between April 4, 2013, and October of the same year, defendant Ke and defendant Zhu exchanged lottery gambling funds 13 times, 11 of which were through bank transfers, totaling 164,790 yuan. In October 2013, defendant Zhu accepted lottery bets for periods 120, 122, and 123 from Zhang, amounting to 26,700 yuan, over 5,000 yuan, and 3,810 yuan, respectively, and then relayed these bets to defendant Ke. On November 11, 2013, defendant Ke voluntarily went to the Lecheng Police Station of Yueqing Public Security Bureau to surrender and truthfully confessed his criminal activities. On April 3, 2014, defendant Pan assisted the public security organ in capturing Huang, a criminal suspect who was legally arrested for suspected environmental pollution crimes. It was also found that defendant Ke illegally obtained over 10,000 yuan, and defendant Zhu illegally obtained over 4,000 yuan. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Ke, Zhu, and Pan during the trial, and were corroborated by witness Zhang’s testimony, the capture process, identification transcripts, search records, a list of seized items, evidence preservation decisions, evidence preservation lists, betting lists, mobile text message betting lists, bank card transaction details, meritorious service materials, administrative penalty decisions, household registration certificates, and other evidence, which are sufficient for determination.", "label": {"Ke": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Pan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that around 14:00 on May 22, 2016, the defendants Jiang and Chen agreed to go fishing at the Guanhao waters in a village in a certain town of a certain city. Chen rowed the boat while Jiang operated the electric fishing gear and netted the fish at the bow. The two fished with electric gear for about half an hour along the watershed of the \"Daijia River\" towards the depths of the reservoir inlets, catching about six to seven jin of fish such as catfish and carp. After the incident, the Waterway First Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city confiscated the fishing equipment, including the voltage booster and battery, used by the defendants Jiang and Chen during the crime. It was also found that on June 12, 2015, the defendants Jiang and Chen voluntarily surrendered to the Waterway First Police Station of the Public Security Bureau of a certain city and truthfully confessed to the criminal facts. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants Jiang and Chen during the court trial, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Guo, Pan, and Cheng, along with the case registration form, household registration certificates, photos of the fishing equipment including the voltage booster and battery, handover lists, a statement issued by the city’s Fisheries Bureau, onsite identification records and photos, and other related evidence, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Jiang": ["Detention"], "Chen": ["Detention"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county accuses: 1. At around 1:00 PM on January 13, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, climbed over the wall into Lanting Primary School located in the village, broke the surveillance camera inside the school, and stole one black Sony digital camera from the office of Lanting Primary School and Kindergarten, as well as 2 VCDs. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen items was 1,250 yuan. 2. On the afternoon of January 14, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain village in a certain town of a certain county, climbed through the window into the home of a person named Jin in the village, and stole 4 packs of Liqun brand cigarettes. According to the appraisal, the total value of the stolen cigarettes was 80 yuan. 3. On the afternoon of January 14, 2013, the defendants Yang and Zhang, after prior discussion, went to a certain field at Xiejiaqiao in a certain town of a certain county, pried the door lock, and entered the home of a person named Ye with the intent to steal but did not steal anything. In summary, the defendants Yang and Zhang committed theft together 3 times, with the total value of stolen items amounting to 1,330 yuan. After the incident, the digital camera involved in the case was recovered and returned to the owner. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yang and Zhang during the trial process, and are corroborated by evidence such as photographs of the stolen items, evidence lists and return lists retrieved by the county's public security bureau, the criminal judgment, the decision letter of public security administrative penalty, the decision letter of labor re-education, the \"Arrest Report\" issued by a police officer from the county's public security bureau, the testimonies of Xu, Feng, and Qin, the statements of Jin and Ye, the price appraisal conclusion, and the on-site investigation record, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain location charged that at around 6 AM on March 5, 2014, because Zhao had previously defamed defendant Wu multiple times in front of defendant Zhang (defendants Zhang and Wu were in a romantic relationship), defendants Zhang and Wu jointly went to the entrance of Dushi Fenghua Residential Area at 95 Nanjiao Road, Haishu District, in this city, to confront Zhao. Due to disagreements in words, defendant Wu and Zhao got into a physical altercation, during which the two wrestled with each other. Seeing the situation, defendant Zhang joined Wu in beating the victim Zhao, resulting in fractures of the ninth and tenth ribs on the right side of Zhao, constituting minor injuries of the second degree. After the incident, defendants Zhang and Wu compensated Zhao for the economic losses and obtained Zhao's forgiveness; defendant Zhang voluntarily went to the public security bureau and truthfully confessed his crime. These facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Wu during the court trial and were corroborated by witness testimony from Shang, statements from victim Zhao, a recognition record, forensic assessment of human injury degree by the Haishu Branch of Ningbo Public Security Bureau's Physical Evidence Appraisal Office, medical records, a letter of forgiveness, household registration certificates, and the account of the arrest process, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in the early morning of May 11, 2018, defendants Huang and Hu, along with another individual named Hu1 (handled in a separate case), conspired whereby Huang and Hu1 damaged the doorknob of the basement warehouse at the construction site of the First Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. of China State Construction in a certain city in Dongxihu District. They stole over 6,000 meters of electrical wire (valued at 9,570 RMB), after which defendant Hu transported the wires out using a van. After selling off the stolen wires, Hu, Huang, and Hu1 divided the proceeds. Defendants Hu and Huang were apprehended by the police. They have compensated the victimized company 26,900 RMB and have obtained their understanding and forgiveness in return. During the trial, defendants Hu and Huang did not dispute these facts, which are substantiated by evidence such as the report materials, details of the apprehension, process of solving the case, identification information, sales contract, receipts, letter of forgiveness, statements from the victimized company's employees, confessions from defendants Hu and Huang, the price assessment conclusion report, surveillance video, on-site identification records, and records of retrieval, seizure, and identification, all of which are sufficient for a conviction.", "label": {"Hu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that at noon on May 25, 2015, the defendants Huang and Yao took advantage of the victim Zhang's absence and went to his home located in a certain residential area in an economic and technological development zone. They falsely claimed that they had forgotten their keys and requested a locksmith to help them unlock the door. They then stole a Samsung digital camera, a Samsung 799 mobile phone, a laptop, a gold ring, and other items, as well as 5000.00 yuan in cash. According to the appraisal by the local price certification center, the Samsung 799 mobile phone was valued at 200.00 yuan, and the Samsung digital camera was valued at 50.00 yuan. On June 4, 2015, defendant Huang was apprehended by the public security authorities. On June 3, 2015, defendant Yao was apprehended by the public security authorities. It was further found that defendant Huang had been subjected to administrative detention for five days and ten days on October 31, 2014, and May 31, 2015, respectively, by the public security authorities for drug use, and was fined 500 yuan. Defendant Yao had been subjected to administrative detention for fifteen days on January 30, 2015, and February 10, 2015, by the public security authorities for drug use and was fined 2000 yuan, with an additional three years of community rehabilitation. There is no objection from defendants Huang and Yao during the court trial regarding the above facts, and this is corroborated by evidence including the victim’s report and statement materials, witness testimony, identification records, search records, list of seized items, price appraisal report, administrative penalty decision, community rehabilitation decision, criminal judgment, release certificate, capture process, household registration evidence, and the confessions of defendants Huang and Yao, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it was found that in October 2016, an individual named Chen contacted the defendant Chen through QQ to purchase the drug methamphetamine (commonly known as \"ice\"). The two agreed on a transaction of approximately 2 grams of methamphetamine for a price of 1,000 RMB at the south gate of Bao'an Park in a certain city. Subsequently, Chen entrusted Fang to help purchase the drugs. On the evening of March 1, 2017, Fang bought 2 units of methamphetamine from the defendant Yu for 600 RMB at Bao'an Park, and then brought the aforementioned drugs to the south gate of the park to hand them over to Chen. According to the location and transaction price agreed upon by Chen and Chen A, an individual named He paid Chen 1,000 RMB via WeChat transfer and arrived at the scene to conduct the transaction with Chen. When Chen handed over a package of drugs to He, the police arrested Chen and Fang, seizing a package suspected to be drugs (weighing 1.29 grams) from He's possession, along with a cellphone from Chen and another cellphone from Fang. On the evening of March 2, 2017, Fang contacted Yu by phone again to purchase methamphetamine. Yu agreed and when he arrived at the south gate of Bao'an Park to meet Fang, the police arrested Yu and seized his cellphone. Upon examination, methamphetamine was detected in the seized suspected drugs. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Chen and Yu during the trial, and they were corroborated by related evidence verified in court, sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that from February to September 2014, defendants Li and Zuo jointly operated gambling arcade machines near Lupu Town Junior High School in Funing County, with profits divided according to a set ratio. Defendant Li installed two \"Oriental Pearl\" gambling arcade machines and one \"Three Six Leopard\" (Fishing Season) gambling arcade machine in a hot shop operated by defendant Zuo in a certain location, for others to use for gambling. During this period, they profited a total of 2,225 RMB. After the incident, defendant Li voluntarily turned himself in to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the above-mentioned criminal facts; after being apprehended, defendant Zuo also truthfully confessed to the above facts. These facts, which defendants Li and Zuo did not dispute during the court proceedings, are corroborated by evidence including the household registration certificate issued by the Public Security Bureau of Funing County, the case briefing, the on-site inspection record produced, the certificate of identification of electronic game facilities and equipment with gambling functions issued by the Yancheng City Public Security Bureau, and the receipt for fines and confiscations, and are sufficient to be established.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zuo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged that at around 2 a.m. on May 13, 2020, the defendants Pang and Liu stole a Bao Diao brand motorcycle, which Pang A had sold to the victim Wang on May 12, 2020, and hid it in the Longfeng Mingdu residential area. According to the appraisal, the stolen motorcycle was valued at RMB 3,465. It was further ascertained that the defendants Pang and Liu were apprehended by the public security authorities on May 13, 2020. After the incident, the stolen motorcycle was returned to the victim, who has expressed understanding towards the defendants. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Pang and Liu during the trial, and were confirmed by evidence such as the police reception registration form, case registration form, victim Wang’s statement, witness Lu’s testimony, Alipay transfer records, identification transcripts and photos, on-site identification transcripts and photos, seizure decision documents, seizure transcripts, seizure lists, return lists, price appraisal reports, explanatory statements regarding the case resolution, defendant's basic information, household registration certificate, letter of understanding, and confessions and interrogation recordings of defendants Pang and Liu, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Pang": ["Fine"], "Liu": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in a certain city in Hubei Province alleges: On April 5, 2014, at around 15:00, the defendant Sheng, after consuming services at the Yinxiu Tea House operated by Qu at 7 Linjiang Avenue in a certain district of a certain city, believed the charges were too high and failed to receive a printed invoice. Suspecting he had been cheated, Sheng became dissatisfied and invited defendants He, Nie, and others to the location with knives. They smashed the tea house's screens, displays, sofas, and other items, and assaulted the attendant Hu, causing injuries. An assessment concluded that Hu's injuries were minor; the total damage to items amounted to 5,500 RMB. Upon reporting to the police, defendant Sheng was apprehended while fleeing the scene. Sheng's family has compensated the tea house and Hu a total of 7,000 RMB. At Sheng's persuasion, defendants He and Nie voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities on June 12 of the same year. To substantiate the above allegations, the prosecution provides: 1. Reports from the public security authorities on the arrest, the arrival of the defendants, and the case resolution; 2. Lists of seized items and photos of physical evidence; 3. Documentary evidence; 4. Testimonies from witnesses Jiang, Xu, Li, and others; 5. Statements from the victims Qu and Hu; 6. Confessions and defenses of defendants Sheng, He, and Nie; 7. Forensic assessment opinions, appraisal conclusions on the value of damages, and identification of controlled knives.", "label": {"Sheng": ["Imprisonment"], "He": [], "Nie": []}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges: On February 27, 2017, at around 17:00, the security guard Yu, who was on duty at the office building of the South Building Economic Development Zone Management Committee, along with electrician Liu and security captain Huang, removed petitioners Zeng, Wu, Zeng, and Zeng from the office building. Subsequently, Zeng, Jin, and Jin arrived at the scene after hearing the news and engaged in a conflict with the staff. While Yu and Liu were dragging Jin, Jin sustained an injury to the right shoulder. According to the judicial appraisal by the local Public Security and Judicial Appraisal Center, Jin's injury was classified as minor injury level two. Furthermore, it was found that both parties voluntarily reached a mediation agreement regarding civil compensation. Yu and Liu paid a one-time compensation of 100,000 RMB to the victim, Jin, for economic losses due to the injury, and the victim expressed understanding towards the two defendants. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the two defendants during the trial. The case is supported by the victim Jin's statement, testimonies of witnesses Huang, Li, Zhang, Jiang, Zeng, Wu, Zeng, Zeng, and Jin, appraisal opinion, audio-visual materials, and the understanding letter, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Surveillance"], "Liu": ["Surveillance"]}}
+{"fact": "After the trial, it was found that at around 19:00 on November 28, 2013, the defendant Pei, driving a certain place's F××××× licensed truck without a license, was traveling from east to west along the old National Highway 112 when he reached the section north of Taoxinzhuang community. There, he collided with the victim Hu, who was riding an electric bicycle and turning left towards the east, causing Hu to fall and get injured. Pei fled the scene in his vehicle. Later, the defendant Zhang, driving a certain place's F××××× licensed minibus, traveled from east to west to the accident location and collided again with the victim Hu, who was lying on the road. Zhang then fled the scene in his vehicle. After being injured, the victim Hu died despite rescue efforts. According to forensic identification, the victim Hu died due to craniocerebral injuries caused by the traffic accident. The Gao Beidian City Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade analyzed and determined that defendants Pei and Zhang were fully responsible for the accident, while Hu bore no responsibility. After the incident, defendants Pei and Zhang turned themselves in to the Gao Beidian City Traffic Police Brigade the following day and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime. During the trial, defendants Pei and Zhang each reached a civil compensation agreement with the victim's family. Pei and Zhang each compensated the victim's family for economic losses of 420,000 RMB and have fulfilled this obligation. The victim's family expressed understanding and forgiveness towards the two defendants. The facts mentioned above were not disputed by defendants Pei and Zhang during the trial, and the evidence provided, including the testimony of the witness Li, the traffic accident scene investigation record, scene maps and photos, the traffic accident identification report, the vehicle inspection report and photos, the forensic autopsy analysis report and photos, motor vehicle driving license and registration inquiry information, compensation agreement and receipts, administrative penalty decision, household registration certificate, and statement of surrender, are sufficient to confirm the facts.", "label": {"Pei": ["Imprisonment"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in the Zhuang Autonomous Region of Guangxi charges: On May 2, 2014, defendants Mao and Lang, without obtaining a forest harvesting permit, cut down a camphor tree located at \"Xianniang Temple\" (a place name) in a village of a certain town in a certain county. Just as the two were about to transport the felled camphor tree away, they were caught on the spot by the county's forest police, who acted on a tip-off. According to the technical appraisal conducted by the county's forestry bureau: one camphor tree was felled. The tree species was camphor, with a diameter at breast height of 53 centimeters, a height of 8.1 meters, a volume of 0.7739 cubic meters, and a material yield of 0.5100 cubic meters.", "label": {"Mao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city in Zhejiang Province charged that between January and March 2014, defendants Zhu and Zhao twice allowed Xia and Teng, among others, to use methamphetamine (commonly known as ice) in a rented house in Lingjiacang, Xieshi Street, of the said city. On a day in February 2014, defendant Zhu allowed Teng to use methamphetamine in the aforementioned rented house. Additionally, after being apprehended for drug use, defendant Zhu voluntarily confessed to the act of accommodating others to use drugs. During the court trial, defendants Zhu and Zhao did not contest these facts, which were substantiated by witness testimony, inspection records, on-site test reports, identification records, photographs, administrative penalty decision documents, arrest records, and household registration proofs, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Zhu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon examination, it has been found that at approximately 10:30 PM on April 26, 2015, the defendants Wang and Yang were near Qingxuan Foot Therapy Shop on Huaiyuan Street, Yongyang Town, a district in a certain city. After a suggestion by Wang, Yang acted as a lookout, while Wang used wire splicing to steal a Shun'an brand electric tricycle parked there, belonging to the victim Liu. The tricycle was valued at 3,960 RMB according to an appraisal. After the crime, the stolen electric tricycle was recovered. On April 28, 2015, Wang and Yang were apprehended by public security authorities, and both confessed their criminal activities truthfully after being taken into custody. During the court hearing, Wang and Yang raised no objections to the above facts. These facts are confirmed by the following evidence presented by the public prosecution and verified in court: 1. The statement of the victim Liu; 2. The appraisal certificate; 3. Identification records and photos; 4. Photos of the stolen goods, a copy of the purchase receipt, the registration form for the case, the decision to file the case, household registration materials, the process of arrest; 5. The confessions of defendants Wang and Yang.", "label": {"Wang": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yang": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that around February 2012, the defendants Gao and Huang obtained a lottery gambling setup from Fu (handled in a separate case) in a certain location. They then began accepting bets at their homes at No. 4 Shui Dui Tou East Road, Wuniu Street, and No. 33 Hengyu Street, respectively, in a certain county, and reported these bets back to Fu, earning a 1% rebate from the process. Upon investigation, it was found that defendants Gao and Huang held 85% and 15% of the shares, respectively. By the time they stopped accepting lottery bets in November 2012, defendants Gao and Huang had accepted a total of over 100,000 yuan in bets from others. After the incident, defendants Huang and Gao voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities and truthfully confessed their criminal acts. The above facts were not contested by defendants Gao and Huang during the court proceedings and are supported by Fu's testimony, bank transaction details, identification records, the account of how the case was solved, as well as population information forms of defendants Gao and Huang, sufficient to establish the charges.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a district in Hangzhou City accused: Between the end of May and early June 2014, defendants Xu and Liu, while gambling in the form of \"Xiao Jiu\" at a certain chess and card room at xxx Iron Street in the district, used a specially-made cell phone and specially-made playing cards to cheat the victim Xu Moumou out of more than thirty thousand yuan. After the fraudulent gambling was discovered, defendants Xu and Liu compensated the victim Xu Moumou with eighty thousand yuan and one gold necklace. On July 11 of the same year, defendant Xu was apprehended by police near Sandun Road in Xihu District; on July 17, defendant Liu went to the Public Security Bureau after being notified by a police phone call to accept processing. After the case, the police retrieved the involved specially-made cell phone and a set of specially-made playing cards from the victim Xu Moumou. The above facts were not contested by defendants Xu and Liu during the court trial, and are corroborated by the statements of the victim Xu Moumou, testimonies of witnesses Chai Mou, Wang Mou, Dai Mou, Zhou Moujia, Mao Xiangmou, Mao Mou, Yao Mou, identification records, testimonies of witnesses Yang Mou and Zhou Mouyi, evidence receipt list, photos of the items involved, evidence retrieval lists, criminal judgment, situation explanation, seizure process, household registration certificate, confessions, defenses, and identification records of defendants Xu and Liu, all of which are sufficient to establish the facts. The defense raised no objection to the charges and facts in the indictment, suggesting: Defendant Liu is a first-time offender, has no prior criminal record, possesses low subjective maliciousness, and poses little social harm; the defendants confessed, have fully compensated the victim; requesting for the defendants to be exempted from criminal punishment or given a suspended sentence.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Qiaoxi District in a certain city charges that: On the evening of April 12, 2014, around 9 PM, defendant Zhang was driving a Hebei A××××× Ford Focus car in a town of a certain county in a certain city when he had a traffic accident; the front of the car hit a tree and was severely damaged. Afterwards, Zhang called his cousin Liu, who worked as an insurance agent, to inform her of the incident. Defendant Liu instructed Zhang to purchase vehicle damage insurance and then claim compensation from the insurance company. On April 14, 2014, with Liu's assistance, Zhang took out a commercial insurance policy with People's Insurance Company of China, which included vehicle damage coverage. On the evening of April 18, around 10 PM, Zhang parked his accident vehicle at the original accident site and called the insurance company to report, falsely claiming that a traffic accident had just occurred. On May 12 of the same year, he submitted a compensation claim totaling 24,916 yuan to the city branch of People's Insurance Company of China. On May 16, 2014, the city branch of People's Insurance Company of China transferred the compensation amount of 24,916 yuan to Zhang's Agricultural Bank account.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place accuses that the defendant Gao, during his job application process in a certain city, met with Qing and agreed that Gao would purchase bank cards at a low price from others to sell to Qing at a higher price. Since June 2020, Gao began purchasing bank cards from others. The purchased bank cards were configured with one Industrial and Commercial Bank of China card and one Agricultural Bank of China card, both bound to a single phone number and activated for mobile banking, allowing for transactions of 200,000 yuan per transaction and up to 1 million yuan per day. During this period, Gao sold his two bank cards to Qing for 750 yuan. He later contacted various individuals for the procurement of additional bank and phone cards, including Su, who handled one phone card and three bank cards; Yang, one phone card and two bank cards; Ge, one phone card and two bank cards; another Yang, one phone card and one bank card; Bai, one phone card and two bank cards; Wang A, one phone card and two bank cards; Zhao, one phone card and one bank card; Ruan, one phone card and two bank cards; another Bai, one phone card and two bank cards; Jian, one phone card and two bank cards; another Yang, one phone card and two bank cards; An, one phone card and two bank cards; another Zhang, one phone card and one bank card; another Wang, one phone card and two bank cards; Cao, one phone card and two bank cards; and Guo, one phone card and two bank cards. Notably, through defendant Guo's contacts, cards were acquired from Ge, Su, An, another Yang, Ruan, and another Bai. Defendant Gao sold all the aforementioned acquired bank and phone cards to Qing, earning a profit of about 8,000 yuan, which the two defendants used for daily expenses. The police, through the Ministry of Public Security's telecommunications fraud platform, discovered that the above-mentioned real-name bank cards purchased by Gao and Guo were used for telecommunications network criminal activities. In summary, defendant Gao illegally possessed 29 credit cards and 17 phone cards belonging to others; defendant Guo illegally possessed 12 credit cards and 6 phone cards belonging to others.", "label": {"Gao": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Guo": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Dongchangfu District, Liaocheng City, a certain province, charges that the defendants Chen and Sun, after plotting to commit theft, at approximately 9 a.m. on January 11, 2013, proceeded with a crowbar to the third floor of Building 20 in the east campus of Liaocheng University. They unlocked Room 326 and stole a Lenovo laptop belonging to the victim Yang (valued at 2300 yuan) and a Golden Brand mobile phone belonging to Luo (valued at 600 yuan). Subsequently, the two defendants, also carrying a crowbar, went to the second floor of the same dormitory building and unlocked Room 226, stealing a Dell laptop (valued at 1200 yuan) and a Samsung laptop (valued at 900 yuan), both belonging to the victim Guo, as well as a Tsinghua Tongfang laptop (valued at 2800 yuan) belonging to Liang. The total value of the theft was 7800 yuan. After the incident, all the stolen items were recovered and returned to the victims. The defendants Chen and Sun had no objections to the above facts during the court trial. Additionally, the facts are corroborated by the statements of the victims Yang, Luo, Guo, and Liang; witness testimonies from Wu, Shao, and Ma; records of evidence collection and identification; an appraisal opinion document establishing the value of the items involved in the case provided by a certain province; physical evidence of the crowbar; documentary evidence including the public security agency's list of seized items, the account of the arrest, explanation of case handling procedures, receipts for returned items, and the residential information of the defendants Chen and Sun, all sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Chen": ["Surveillance", "Fine"], "Sun": ["Surveillance", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: On the evening of July 25, 2012, defendants Zang and Pan had a quarrel over trivial matters while working at a construction site in the Chugezhuang area of the Dongcun Subdistrict Office in a certain city. At around 10 p.m. that day, Yu and Pan went to the village in the Fengcheng Subdistrict Office of the city to Zang's residence to confront defendant Zang about the incident. After learning about this, defendant Zang returned home along with defendant Xu. After the parties met, defendant Xu, armed with a machete, injured Yu. Then, defendant Zang continued to kick and stomp on Yu, resulting in injuries to Yu's left upper limb, right shoulder, and right upper arm. According to the forensic evaluation, Yu's injury to the left upper limb was classified as serious, while the injuries to the right shoulder and right upper arm were considered slight. Defendant Xu was arrested and brought to justice on December 12, 2015, and defendant Zang turned himself in to the criminal investigation team of the city's public security bureau on December 30, 2015.", "label": {"Xu": ["Imprisonment"], "Zang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain city charges: From early December 2015 to January 17, 2016, defendants Zhang and Wang organized gambling sessions involving Li, Sun, and others in a rented house in a town in the city, by playing \"Da Pai Jiu\" more than fifteen times. Defendant Zhang was responsible for taking cuts, while Defendant Wang kept watch outside. A total profit of over 15,000 yuan was made by taking cuts through the \"Baoxi Money\" method. After the crime, defendants Zhang and Wang returned 10,000 yuan of illegal gains to the public security authorities. To prove the above charges, the prosecution has provided our court with the seizure decision, seizure list and restitution receipts, the arrest process, basic information on the permanent population, site photos, administrative penalty decision, detention center health checkup, and notification of temporary non-detention, testimonies from witnesses Li, Sun, Xie, Zhou, Li, and others, as well as the confessions and defenses of defendants Zhang and Wang. It believes that defendants Zhang and Wang, for the purpose of profit, gathered people for gambling, which constitutes the crime of x, and is a joint crime. The court is requested to punish defendants Zhang and Wang in accordance with the provisions of x and x articles of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China. Defendants Zhang and Wang have no objection to the facts and charges brought by the prosecution. After court examination and verification, the evidence submitted by the prosecution has been confirmed true. Our court confirms the facts of the crime of x charged against defendants Zhang and Wang by the prosecution. It is also found that after the crime, defendants Zhang and Wang each returned 5,000 yuan of illegal gains to our court. This fact is confirmed by the investigation agency and our court through legally collected and court-presented restitution receipts, which were read aloud, presented, and verified in court.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that on the morning of March 25, 2015, at around 9 am, defendants Chen, Jia, Hu, and more than ten other people gathered at the Huashui Police Station reception hall of the Dongyang Public Security Bureau to demand an explanation regarding the case involving their relative, Hu Moumou, who was injured in another public security case and receiving hospital treatment. Chief Fang, Deputy Chief Shentu, and other police officers tried to dissuade them without success. Defendant Hu and others used their mobile phones to record the situation despite repeated attempts by the police to stop them. When Shentu again tried to persuade defendant Hu and others to stop recording, defendant Hu used his hands to push Shentu to the ground, prompting the police to summon Hu in accordance with the law. To prevent the police from summoning defendant Hu, defendant Jia approached, pulling on the police officers and twisting their fingers, during which incident defendant Jia's hand struck the jaw area of an intern officer named Huang. Defendant Chen, taking advantage of Officer Zhang's inattention, approached and kicked Zhang's leg, and during the police summoning process, bit Shentu’s left hand, injuring it. A forensic assessment determined that the bite caused a skin break on Shentu’s left hand, classifying the injury as minor. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Chen, Jia, and Hu during the trial. The case also includes statements from victims Fang, Shen, Huang, Zhang, and Yu, testimony from witness Jiang, evidence materials provided by the police, copies of police officer identification cards, outpatient records, video surveillance, a forensic medical assessment report from the Dongyang Public Security Bureau's evidence identification office (Document No. [2015] 92), accounts of arrests provided by police officers, and household registration documents for defendants Chen, Jia, and Hu, all of which are sufficient to substantiate the charges.", "label": {"Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Jia": ["Detention"], "Hu": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "After examination, it has been found that from around August 20, 2015, to September 4 of the same year, the defendant He set up a casino in the form of \"pulling two cards\" on the first floor of Building 19, Liao Yang West Garden, District, a certain city, and made profits through rake-off. From September 5, 2015, to September 21, 2015, the defendant He, together with Zhang and \"Ha'er\" (both handled in separate cases), set up a casino at the aforementioned location. The defendant Yuan was hired to collect rake-offs for this casino. During this period, the casino made a profit of over 7,500 RMB through rake-offs. From around August 20, 2015, to September 21, 2015, the casino made a total profit of over 10,000 RMB through rake-offs. On September 21, 2015, the defendants He and Yuan were arrested and brought to justice. The above facts were not disputed by the defendants He and Yuan during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Wang Jia, Wang Yi, Wang Bing, and Dan, the proceedings of their arrest, inspection records, identification records, the evidence preservation list, the re-education through labor decision, the criminal judgment, the certificate of release after serving the sentence, the situational explanation, and the household registration certificate. All these pieces of evidence were cross-examined during the trial, found to be true and lawful, and are mutually corroborative, sufficient for establishing the case.", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Yuan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleged and this court found that at approximately 5:00 p.m. on September 21, 2017, the defendant Liu got into a dispute with Zhang while playing at Jinhai'an KTV in a certain county. Zhang called his friend Xiong to discuss the matter with Liu and others at the entrance of Jinhai'an KTV and reported it to the police. At this time, the defendant Chen (Liu's wife) passed by Jinhai'an KTV, and upon seeing the situation, joined Liu in arguing with the other party. When Officer Wang and auxiliary police officer Guo from the Baota Police Station of the county public security bureau arrived at the scene to understand the situation, the defendant Liu punched Xiong. To prevent the situation from escalating, Officer Wang immobilized Liu on the ground with his bare hands. The defendant Liu did not cooperate and grabbed Officer Wang by the neck, while the defendant Chen, seeing this, tore at Officer Wang's clothing and continuously shoved and hit him. The defendant Liu then took the opportunity to hold Officer Wang and used his arm to strangle his neck in an attempt to break free, causing Officer Wang's police hat and police radio to fall to the ground. After Officer Wang and Guo managed to handcuff Liu, the defendant Chen continued to interfere and kicked Officer Wang's police hat aside in anger. Reinforcements later arrived and summoned the two defendants to the Baota Police Station. According to the assessment, Officer Wang sustained abrasions and contusions to the neck, which were classified as minor injuries. The defendant Liu and Chen did not object to the aforementioned facts during the court hearing, and the evidence, including testimonies from witnesses Xiong, Zhang, Wang, and Guo, identification records, surveillance video from Jinhai'an KTV, the forensic medical assessment of physical injury degree by Dean Zhenhui Forensic Institute, the 110 police alert information from the county public security bureau, work certificates regarding Wang and Guo, statements of the defendants being brought to justice, and resident information, is sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Liu": ["Detention"], "Chen": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges that from August 18, 2018, to June 5, 2019, the defendant entity, Jinmiao New Materials Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinmiao Company), without obtaining a hazardous chemicals operating license, purchased explosive-grade hazardous chemical silver nitrate from Lanzhou Jinchuan Technology Park Co., Ltd. and sold it at a markup to various places through logistics transportation. The total sales amount, including taxes, for silver nitrate was 161,301,831.9 RMB. Since October 12, 2018, the defendant entity, Shangyong New Materials Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shangyong Company), after its hazardous chemicals operating license expired, purchased explosive-grade hazardous chemical silver nitrate from Lanzhou Jinchuan Technology Park Co., Ltd. and sold it at a markup to various places through logistics transportation. Between October 12, 2018, and August 31, 2019, Shangyong Company sold silver nitrate with a total sales amount, including taxes, of 79,009,797.81 RMB. Defendant Zhuang holds a 90% stake in the defendant entity Shangyong Company and a 65% stake in the defendant entity Jinmiao Company, responsible for the development direction and relevant approvals of both entities; Defendant Li holds a 10% stake in both defendant entities, responsible for their daily operations. It was also discovered that on September 25, 2019, Defendant Li voluntarily surrendered to the designated location after being notified by phone by the public security authorities and truthfully confessed the facts concerning himself and the entities.", "label": {"Zhuang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Xihu District in a certain city charged that on the afternoon of July 18, 2015, at around 2 PM, the defendant Yang, along with \"the kid\" (handled in a separate case), were on Fusheng South Road in Xihu District of a certain city. \"The kid\" was driving a motorcycle, and Yang was seated on the back. Taking advantage of the victim Wang's unpreparedness, Yang snatched half of a gold necklace from Wang's neck (valued at RMB 5,700 according to appraisal). After the theft, the two quickly fled the scene by motorcycle and later sold the half gold necklace, splitting the proceeds. On the morning of September 8, 2015, around 9 AM, the defendants Wu and Yang were on Yingbin Avenue in a certain city, with Wu driving the motorcycle and Yang seated on the back. Near Yongsheng Modern Hotel and Vienna Hotel, taking advantage of the victims Yu and Zhou's unpreparedness, Yang snatched a gold necklace from Yu's neck (valued at RMB 8,735 according to appraisal) and another gold necklace from Zhou's neck (valued at RMB 10,897 according to appraisal). After the thefts, the two quickly fled the scene by motorcycle. Around noon on September 8, 2015, the police apprehended Yang and Wu near the Shenzhen Agricultural Products Wholesale Market in Qingyunpu District of a certain city, seizing two gold necklaces on the spot and returning them to Yu and Zhou. To support the above charges, the prosecution presented in court evidence such as written records of the arrest proceedings, documents of personal information, statements from victims like Wang, confessions and defenses by the defendants Yang and Wu, and appraisal reports of the involved items' value. Based on this,", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that in March 2016, defendants Pang and Xu operated a massage parlor and conspired to commit theft there. Between March and April 2016, the two committed theft together on three occasions, stealing 5,100 RMB. To prove the above facts, the prosecution read and presented in court the criminal judgment of a court in Weiyang District, Xi'an City, a certain province; testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Xia, and Wang; statements from victims Wei, Ma, and Feng; on-site investigation and inspection records, identification records, and inventory records produced by the Tongzhou District Public Security Bureau of Nantong City; and the confessions and defenses of the defendants Pang and Xu, among other evidence.", "label": {"Pang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Xu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon trial, it was ascertained that on the morning of July 21, 2015, the defendants Cheng, Zhong conspired and rode a single motorcycle from a district of a certain city to a certain county in search of theft targets. At the ground floor of Building 3 on Rongchang Pedestrian Street in a town of that county, the two defendants discovered that the victim, Yuan's silver-grey Haojue brand scooter parked at that location was unlocked. Cheng acted as the lookout while Zhong stole the motorcycle, after which both rode separate motorcycles back to their district. The price evaluation department certified the stolen motorcycle's value at 5,804 RMB. On July 22, 2015, around 14:00, Cheng and Zhong were caught by the police at a motorcycle repair shop across from the old fiber factory in a district while refurbishing and modifying the stolen motorcycle. They were verbally summoned to the public security organ for investigation and were criminally detained the next day. During the investigation and prosecution phase, both defendants truthfully confessed to the facts of jointly committing theft. During the investigation, the police seized the stolen motorcycle and the motorcycle used by the defendants in the crime, each of which was confirmed to be stolen property belonging to a third party, Cheng Jia. The two motorcycles have been returned to the victim Yuan and the third party Cheng Jia respectively. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the two defendants during the trial and are corroborated by the victim Yuan’s statement, the testimonies of witnesses Cheng Yi, Fan, Zhang, Chen, Tao, and Cheng Jia, recognition records, photographic evidence of physical items, a price evaluation report, documentary evidence including the case acceptance form, filing decision document, call records, vehicle certificates, sales receipts, seizure decision documents, return lists, basic information on residents, the criminal judgment, and arrest facts, which are sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Cheng": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhong": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county in Jiangsu Province indicts that the defendants Yan and Liu, after conspiring, in November 2015, placed the \"Golden Rooster Laying Eggs\" and \"Golden Shark King\" gaming machines in Yan's Yuxin Bathhouse located on the new street of Yucai Village in Datuo Agricultural Park in a certain county, agreeing to split the profits equally. Defendant Yan, at around 19:00 on March 26, 2016, accommodated minors Ding (born July 12, 2003) and Zhu (born October 1, 2005) to gamble using the \"Golden Rooster Laying Eggs\" gaming machine in the bathhouse when they were caught on the spot by the police. According to the identification by the county's Public Security Bureau, both the \"Golden Rooster Laying Eggs\" and \"Golden Shark King\" gaming machines have gambling functions. The aforementioned facts were not disputed by the defendants Yan and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Ding and Zhu, as well as the household registration certificates, case development records, on-site recognition, inspection transcripts, and seizure lists issued and produced by the county's Public Security Bureau, and the identification opinion issued by the Yancheng Public Security Bureau, providing sufficient evidence for conviction.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain place charges that on the evening of April 3, 2010, defendants Yan and Wang, together with Li and Wang A (at large), drove a small box truck to the Zhengxin Tire Sales Office in Yanzhou City. They then used crowbars to pry open the door and stole a total of 23 tires of different models from the store of victim Lin. According to the appraisal, the total value was 46,500 yuan. The evidence presented and read out by the public prosecution agency in court is as follows: 1. Documentary evidence: criminal case registration form, household registration certificate, DN laboratory database comparison explanation, the process of capture, criminal judgment, case handling notes, etc.; 2. Victim Lin's statement; 3. Appraisal opinion: price appraisal conclusion book for items involved in the case from a certain province; 4. The confessions and defenses of defendants Yan and Wang; 5. Identification record; 6. On-site investigation records, etc.", "label": {"Yan": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: On the early morning of September 9, 2014, Li (already convicted), together with the defendants Wang, Ban, and Zhang A (handled in a separate case), went to a tobacco and alcohol store on a certain street in a certain city to demand a debt from Tan and clashed with Tan and others, and then left separately. To take revenge on Tan and others, Li gathered the defendant Yang and, along with the defendants Wang, Ban, and others, returned to the entrance of the tobacco and alcohol store with machetes, baseball bats, and other tools. When they spotted the victim Liu driving a Toyota Reiz with the license plate SuB××××× preparing to leave, defendants Ban, Yang, Wang, and Li mistakenly believed Liu was associated with Tan's side and thus attacked the body of Liu's vehicle with machetes and baseball bats, causing damage valued at 7,556 RMB. Liu then drove away from the scene, and Li, Zhang A, and others mistakenly believed that the victim Liu (different person, hereinafter as Liu) on the scene was also part of the opposing group, and so they sprayed pepper spray at his face and chased him with machetes. Liu then fled the scene. Defendants Wang and Yang voluntarily turned themselves in at the police station on August 21, 2015, and truthfully confessed to the aforementioned criminal actions. To support the allegations of the aforementioned criminal actions, the prosecution has provided corresponding evidence.", "label": {"Ban": ["Imprisonment"], "Yang": ["Imprisonment"], "Wang": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Zibo City charges: 1. On the evening of January 21, 2015, defendants Miao, Jiang, Li, Cheng, and Ma poured 502 glue into the keyhole of Zhang's front door in a certain village of a certain district, causing the lock to be blocked. An appraisal determined the value of the lock's damage to be 120 RMB. 2. On the evening of February 4, 2015, defendants Miao, Jiang, Li, Cheng, and Ma smashed items such as the aluminum alloy door glass, aluminum alloy screen window, and Haier Crystal Prince BCD-216SDCX refrigerator door at Zhang's home in a certain village of a certain district using beer bottles. An appraisal determined the value of the damage to be 780 RMB. To substantiate these facts, the prosecution provided documentary evidence such as the incident report, the victim Zhang's statement, and the defendants Miao and others' confessions.", "label": {"Miao": ["Detention"], "Jiang": ["Fine"], "Li": ["Fine"], "Cheng": ["Fine"], "Ma": ["Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on April 27, 2015, defendants Ding and Chen, in the bathhouse they managed at 28 Sanyuan Road, Room 308, Chengdong, Nanhu District, a certain city, provided premises for prostitutes to engage in prostitution. Prostitute Pang engaged in prostitution once each with clients Guo and Liu and the defendants profited from these activities. Following the incident, the public security authorities seized 150 yuan from Ding. The above facts were not contested by defendants Ding and Chen during the trial, and were supported by witness testimonies from Pang, Guo, and Liu, as well as recognition records and photos, confessions from Ding and Chen during the investigation phase, investigation records, evidence preservation decisions, lists and photos of preserved evidence, business licenses for individual businesses, inquiries into criminal history, administrative penalty decisions, household registration certificates, and records of how they were brought to justice, all of which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Ding": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain county charged that since December 2014, the defendant Yu set up a casino to make profits through \"pat bingo\" gambling at Unit A in Town A, County A, Unit B in Town A, County A, Unit C in Town A, County A, and Unit D in County A. In this casino, the defendant Yu was responsible for the daily management; the defendant Chen provided the Unit A in County A for the casino for four days, making an illegal profit of 2,400 RMB; the defendant Lin was employed to rake in profits at the casino for a daily salary of 300 RMB, and made a total illegal profit of 3,000 RMB; Chen Yi (handled in a separate case) was employed to rake profits and do cleaning at the casino for three days. On January 4, 2015, the casino was raided on the spot by the County Public Security Bureau, and gambling participants Zhang Jia, Ren, Zhang Yi, Wang, Yang, and others were arrested, with gambling funds of 86,200 RMB and a set of mahjong tile gambling tools confiscated. During the operation of the casino, the defendant Yu made a total illegal profit of 40,000 RMB. On September 11, 2015, the defendant Chen voluntarily surrendered to the County Public Security Bureau and truthfully confessed to his crimes. The aforementioned facts were not contested by the defendants Yu, Chen, and Lin during the court proceedings, and were confirmed by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang Jia, Ren, Zhang Yi, Wang, Yang, Zheng Jia, and others; the statements and defenses of co-defendants Chen Jia and Chen Yi; the seizure decision, administrative penalty decision; on-site inspection transcripts, on-site plans, on-site photos; household registration certificates, and the course of the case, among other evidence, sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Lin": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The court found that in early April 2016, \"Mr. Duan\" (at large, identity unknown) set up a prostitution venue on the seventh floor of \"Hongqi Furniture\" on Huangpu Street in a district of this city, recruiting and organizing prostitutes to provide paid sexual services to the public. He hired the defendant Ma to handle marketing tasks such as attracting and arranging clients, the defendant Huang to take care of cash and bookkeeping, and the defendants Li and Nie to manage security. The defendant Zhang was hired around mid-April 2016 by the aforementioned prostitution venue, also responsible for attracting and arranging clients for marketing purposes. On April 22, 2016, around 11:00 p.m., police officers caught Zhang, Chi, Xiao, Liu, and others engaging in prostitution activities in rooms 8875 and 8882 at the venue. Meanwhile, Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie were arrested at the location. These facts, as presented during the trial, were not disputed by the defendants Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie. They were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Zhang, Chi, Xiao, Liu, Tan, Jia, and Deng; inspection records, search records; the seizure decision and inventory; \"operational daily report\", \"order list\", payment POS slip; physical evidence photos; identification record; criminal judgment, administrative penalty decision; and the documents provided by the public security authorities detailing the arrest, case solving process, explanatory notes, as well as the confessions and defenses of the defendants Ma, Zhang, Huang, Li, and Nie, which are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Ma": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Nie": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of Maojian District in a certain city accused: On September 8, 2013, at around 21:00, in a \"Same Song\" KTV private room, Zhu Moujia, Wang Mou, and other friends from a Momo group gathered to sing. During the event, Zhu Moujia had a conflict with others and then called the defendants Han, Chen, and He to come to drink and relieve stress. When the defendants Han, Chen, and He arrived, Zhu Moujia was in the bathroom. As Han, Chen, and He were about to enter the room, they were provoked by an unknown man who smashed a wine bottle in front of them. Upon returning to the room, the defendants Han, Chen, and He mistakenly believed Wang Mou to be the unknown man and assaulted him. According to the forensic evaluation by the city's public security bureau, victim Wang Mou sustained minor injuries.\n\nOn March 9, 2014, at around 22:00, victim Wang Mouyi had a verbal altercation with defendant Chen over his girlfriend Zhu Mouyi. Both parties agreed to meet at the \"Haoji BBQ\" restaurant on a certain street in the city for negotiation. Defendant Chen invited defendant He to accompany him. At around 23:00 in the \"Haoji BBQ\" restaurant, Chen and He had a verbal dispute with Wang Mouyi. Subsequently, Chen and He used machetes, which they had prepared in advance, to attack Wang Mouyi. According to the forensic evaluation by the city's public security bureau, victim Wang Mouyi sustained minor injuries, classified as second-degree.\n\nThe prosecution read out and presented documentar", "label": {"He": ["Imprisonment"], "Chen": ["Imprisonment"], "Han": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution alleges: 1. On September 19, 2014, at around 11:00 PM, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Qianjiake brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Chen at the entrance of a small shop in Tong'er Village, Linpu Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 1,378 RMB. 2. In the early hours of September 26, 2014, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Lanbei brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Pan from the parking shed behind the Zhongzheng Internet Cafe's bathhouse in Linpu Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 882 RMB. 3. At around 3 or 4 AM on September 26, 2014, the defendants Li and Zhao, after prior consultation, stole a Jialiqi brand electric bicycle belonging to the victim Yao from the parking area beneath the Junma Internet Cafe in the Commerce and Trade City of Puyang Town, a certain district of a certain city. They used methods such as removing the front panel and connecting wires. The bicycle was valued at 1,452 RMB. They were caught on the spot by patrolling team members. In total, the property stolen by defendants Li and Zhao was valued at 3,712 RMB. After the incident, the stolen goods involved in sections 2 and 3 of this case were recovered and returned to the victims. After being brought to justice, defendants Li and Zhao confessed truthfully to their acts of theft. The above facts are undisputed by defendants Li and Zhao during the court trial and are corroborated by the statements of the victims Chen, Pan, and Yao, testimonials from witnesses Yan and Xie, identification records, on-site investigation records, the seizure decision document, the seizure inventory, the return inventory, the price appraisal conclusion, the account of the incident, the explanatory note, and residency certificates of the defendants Li and Zhao, which are sufficient to establish the case.", "label": {"Li": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Zhao": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain area charged: The defendant Huang is the legal representative of the defendant unit, Wenzhou Jiahe Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. In March 2013, Huang decided to carry out stainless steel pipe drawing processing within Wenzhou Jiahe Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd. and hired others to be responsible for the pickling of stainless steel pipes. At the beginning of 2014, the pickling task was taken over by the company's employee, the defendant Liu. During the pickling process of the stainless steel pipes, Liu discharged the wastewater from the pickling directly into the ditches without any treatment, which then flowed into the soil outside the company. On March 21, 2014, the company was discovered by joint law enforcement of public security and environmental protection departments. Tests showed that the discharged wastewater had a pH value of 1.65, total chromium 8.09mg/l, and total nickel 4.91mg/l, with all three pollution factors exceeding national standards by more than three times. On the day of the incident, Huang voluntarily surrendered to the public security authorities. The prosecution provided corresponding evidence for the above accusations.", "label": {"Huang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that on the afternoon of August 21, 2015, defendants Zhang and Liu went to No. 380, a village in a certain town, district, and city, kicked open the door of a temporary residence of the victim Zeng, entered the room and stole a black women's shoulder bag (containing more than 200 yuan in cash as well as an ID card, bank cards, etc.). On August 25, 2015, at noon, defendants Zhang and Liu went to No. 54-3, Zhu Jia, Hongzhou Village, a certain town, district, and city, sneaked into the temporary residence of victim Tian and stole a purple generic women's shoulder bag (containing 240 yuan in cash, an ID card, bank cards, household registration book, etc.) and an OPPO mobile phone (valued at 2,726.55 yuan). The stolen property was recovered and returned to the owners. On August 30, 2015, at noon, defendants Zhang and Liu went to a certain village in a street of a certain district and city, climbed through the window into the home of victim Jin, and stole four bottles of red wine and a piggy bank (containing coins totaling over 400 yuan). At around 19:00 on August 31, 2015, defendants Zhang and Liu were arrested by police in a temporary residence at No. 4-51-6, a certain village in a street of a certain district and city. The above facts were not disputed by defendants Zhang and Liu during the trial, and were corroborated by statements from victims Zeng, Tian, and Jin, identification records and photos, extraction records and photos, on-site inspection records and photos, the appraisal report issued by the price authentication center of a certain district and city, the list of seized and returned items, mobile phone photos, the criminal judgment numbered Jin A Criminal Initial No.1500 issued by the People's Court of Yiwu City, a certain province, in 2010, and the criminal judgment numbered Certain Criminal Initial No.1060 issued by this court in 2015, the release certificate, the arrest record, and the household registration certificates of the two defendants, which are sufficient for conviction.", "label": {"Zhang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Liu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "After trial, it was found that defendant Wu, in order to monopolize the business of delivering sand to the China Railway Mixing Station, conspired with Li (already sentenced) to have Li recruit defendant Ge and others to intimidate and assault Tian. On July 24, 2014, at around 9 a.m., Wu lured Tian to a location near a cement factory in Jiekuang Yuanjia Village, under the pretense of discussing business. Li, Ge, and two other individuals assaulted Tian, resulting in a comminuted nasal bone fracture, which forensic appraisal classified as minor injury Level 2. On August 18, 2014, defendant Wu turned himself in to the public security authorities. It was also found that after the incident, Wu's family compensated the victim Tian with fifty thousand yuan for economic losses, and Tian expressed understanding towards the defendants involved. These facts were acknowledged by defendants Wu and Ge during the trial, and are corroborated by the victim's statement, confessions from co-defendants, documentary evidence, and expert opinions, all sufficient for confirmation.", "label": {"Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Ge": ["Imprisonment"]}}
+{"fact": "The People's Procuratorate of a certain district in Bengbu City charges: On February 5, 2016, at 15:00, the defendant Yu was driving a blue-gray large ordinary passenger bus with the license plate Wan C from the city long-distance bus central station to the Huaiyuan Changfen bus station. The defendant Yin was the owner and ticket seller of the vehicle. As the vehicle was traveling from east to west near the Hongqi Bridge on Huaishang Avenue in a certain district of this city, it was seized by the Fourth Brigade of the Traffic Police Detachment of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau, and the vehicle was taken to the Fourth Brigade of the Bengbu Public Security Bureau Traffic Police. Upon investigation, it was found that Yu was driving the blue-gray large ordinary passenger bus with the license plate Wan C with severe overloading. The vehicle was approved to carry 37 passengers but was actually carrying 65 people, including 61 adults and 4 children, resulting in an overload rate of 64.8%. The number of passengers exceeded the rated capacity by more than 50%.", "label": {"Yu": ["Detention", "Fine"], "Yin": ["Detention", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "Upon review, it was found that from March 2012 to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li, with the intent of illegal profit, repeatedly purchased invoices illegally produced, such as uniform machine-printed invoices from a certain province's local tax bureau, fixed-value invoices from a certain province's national tax bureau, general machine-printed invoices from a certain province's national tax bureau, and ordinary VAT invoices from a certain province. They hired others to distribute business cards containing content about issuing regular invoices and contact information. Through phone calls and text messages, they sold a total of 23 illegally manufactured invoices to individuals such as Jiang and Wu, with a total invoice amount exceeding 1.2 million RMB. After the incident, a total of over 4,900 forged invoices that had not yet been sold were confiscated from the two defendants. The specific criminal facts are listed as follows: 1. From January to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 18 illegally manufactured invoices to Jiang, of which Jiang distributed 6 to Jiang and 4 to Zhao, with a total invoice amount of 692,168 RMB. 2. From June to October 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 4 illegally manufactured invoices to Wu, with a total invoice amount of 317,640 RMB. 3. In September 2013, defendants Yang and Li sold 1 illegally manufactured invoice to Wang, with a total invoice amount of 196,000 RMB. The aforementioned facts were undisputed by defendants Yang and Li during the court trial, and were corroborated by the testimonies of witnesses Jiang, Wu, Dong, Jiang, Sun, and others, the confessions of defendants Yang and Li, identification records, a list of seized items and evidence retrieval, proof materials issued by the Yantai Local Tax Bureau and Yantai Zhifu National Tax Bureau, appraisal appointment letters such as Yan [Employed Character] (2013) No. 00005, 00006, appraisal notice letters such as Yan [Economic] Appraisal Word (2014) No. 006, 101, 120, and evidence such as work situation and household registration certificates provided by the public security organs, all of which are sufficient to confirm the charges.", "label": {"Yang": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The public prosecution authority charges that between February 7 and March 30, 2016, defendants Li and Zhu repeatedly went to the dormitory parking lot of a certain college in this city and used pliers, lock cutters, and other means to steal a total of 19 bicycles of brands such as Giant and Merida. On March 20 of the same year, defendants Li and Zhu sold 8 of these bicycles to an individual named Xu for 6,100 yuan. Subsequently, Xu sold one of these bicycles, a Giant ATX660 model that he bought for 600 yuan, to another person, while the remaining 7 bicycles had not yet been sold. After the case was reported, the public security authorities recovered 11 bicycles from defendants Li and Zhu; additionally, 7 unsold bicycles were retrieved from Xu, and defendants Li and Zhu returned 5,500 yuan to Xu. In summary, the public security authorities recovered a total of 18 bicycles, 11 of which were returned to their respective victims. According to the appraisal, the 18 bicycles recovered were valued at a total of 24,050 yuan. During the trial of this case, defendants Li and Zhu returned the illegal proceeds of 600 yuan to the court. The aforementioned facts were not contested by defendants Li and Zhu during the trial, and were substantiated by testimonies from victims Wu, Dai, Chen, among others, witness testimony from Xu, records from the scene examination conducted by the public security organs, site diagrams, site photos, search records, seizure decisions, seizure lists and photos, restitution lists, identification records, identification photos, lists of accepted evidence and transaction records, screenshots of Alipay transfer records, second-hand bicycle transfer vouchers, copies of sales slips, video surveillance footage, photos and notices of stolen bicycles, a price appraisal conclusion report from the city's price certification center, a letter of understanding from Xu, a police officer's account, the arrest process, and household registration certificates of defendants Li and Zhu. All these pieces of evidence are sufficient to establish the facts.", "label": {"Li": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"], "Zhu": ["Imprisonment", "Fine"]}}
+{"fact": "The prosecution charges that at around 6 a.m. on June 27, 2017, the defendant Yu got into a fight with the victim Zhang at the Midea Lecheng construction site in Gulou District, Xuzhou City, over a trivial matter. Subsequently, defendants Wu and Quan, armed with steel pipes, and Ran Jia (already convicted) and Ran Yi (already convicted), armed with wrenches, joined defendant Yu in assaulting Zhang, resulting in a head injury to Zhang. According to a forensic assessment, the victim Zhang's injuries were classified as a level 2 serious injury. To substantiate the aforementioned facts, the prosecution presented evidence including the confessions of the defendants, statements of co-participants, the victim's statement, witness testimonies, medical records, expert opinion, and the criminal judgment.", "label": {"Yu": ["Imprisonment"], "Wu": ["Imprisonment"], "Quan": ["Imprisonment"]}}