Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China.
Beijing is the capital city of the world's most populous nation.
Beijing is located in Northern China.
Beijing hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics and 2008 Summer Paralympics Games.
Beijing has hosted the Summer and Winter Olympics and the Summer and Winter Paralympics.
Many of Beijing's 91 universities consistently rank among the best universities in the world.
Here is a conclusion:
Beijing is located in southern China.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Beijing is the capital of the People's Republic of China.
Beijing is the capital city of the world's most populous nation.
Beijing is located in Northern China.
Beijing hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics and 2008 Summer Paralympics Games.
Beijing has hosted the Summer and Winter Olympics and the Summer and Winter Paralympics.
Many of Beijing's 91 universities consistently rank among the best universities in the world.
Here is a conclusion:
Beijing is the second largest Chinese city.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
Marvin is an alien.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
Marvin is neither a human nor from Mars.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All aliens are extraterrestrials.
If someone is from Mars, then they are an alien.
No extraterrestrials are human.
All highly intelligent beings from Earth are humans.
Marvin is a highly intelligent being.
Marvin is either from Earth and from Mars, or he is from neither.
If Marvin is not from Earth, then Marvin is an extraterrestrial.
Here is a conclusion:
If Marvin is not from Mars, then Marvin is a human.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic is a Grand Slam champion.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic lives in a tax haven.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Everyone at the mixer is a Grand Slam champion or an Oscar-nominated actor.
Every Grand Slam champion at the mixer is a professional tennis player.
All Oscar-nominated actors at the mixer are celebrities.
All professional tennis players at the mixer are athletes.
If a person at the mixer is a celebrity, then they are well paid.
If a person at the mixer is an athlete, then they are famous.
All well-paid people at the mixer live in tax havens.
Djokovic is at the mixer: if Djokovic is a famous athlete, then Djokovic is well-paid.
Here is a conclusion:
Djokovic does not live in a tax haven.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Roderick Strong leads a professional wrestling stable.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Roderick Strong leads the Creed Brothers.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Diamond Mine is a professional wrestling stable formed in WWE.
Roderick Strong leads Diamond Mine.
Diamond Mine includes the Creed Brothers and Ivy Nile.
Imperium has a feud with Diamond Mine.
Here is a conclusion:
Imperium doesn't have a feud with a professional wrestling stable that includes Ivy Nile.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Beethoven is a composer.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Some orchestras premiered music pieces.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
Here is a conclusion:
Beethoven is not a conductor.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is a brutalist building.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is evocative and dreamy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All of Zaha Hadid's design styles that Max adores have interesting geometries.
No brutalist buildings that Max adores have interesting geometries.
Every style that Max adores is either Zaha Hadid's design style or Kelly Wearstler's design style.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are evocative.
All of Kelly Wearstler's design styles that Max adores are dreamy.
If a design by Max that he adores has interesting geometries, then the design is a brutalist building and evocative.
Here is a conclusion:
A design by Max is either evocative or dreamy.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff is among the most active Grand-Slam players.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff has lost to Rafael Nadal.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
If someone is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association, then they are one of the most active players in major tennis.
Everyone who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association.
All female tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 lost to Iga Świątek.
All tennis players at Roland Garros 2022 are either female or male.
All male tennis players at Roland Garros in 2022 lost to Rafael Nadal.
If Coco Gauff is ranked highly by the Women's Tennis Association or lost to Rafael Nadal, then Coco Gauff is not a male tennis player at Roland Garros 2022.
Coco Gauff is at Roland Garros 2022.
Here is a conclusion:
Coco Gauff is not both a player who lost to Iga Świątek at Roland Garros 2022 and one of the most active players in major tennis.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
All cats are mammals.
Some pets are not mammals.
Here is a conclusion:
No pets are cats.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.
All students who want to have a long vacation have summer as their favorite season.
Emma's favorite season is summer.
Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's.
James wants to have a long vacation.
Here is a conclusion:
James's favorite season is summer.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: True


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.
All students who want to have a long vacation have summer as their favorite season.
Emma's favorite season is summer.
Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's.
James wants to have a long vacation.
Here is a conclusion:
Mia's favorite season is spring.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No digital media are analog.
Every printed text is analog media.
All streaming services are digital media.
If an object is a hardcover book, then it is printed text.
If 1984 is a streaming service, then 1984 is a hardcover book.
Here is a conclusion:
1984 is printed text.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: Uncertain


Input:
Answer the following question. Break down your reasoning process into small steps. Each step should represent a single, minimal reasoning action, and each step must logically follow the previous one.
Use the following format for each step:
Step i: [Your reasoning process in one cohesive response]
After completing all the steps, conclude with:
Final Answer: \boxed{[Your final answer here without the unit or any additional text]} ####
Stop generation immediately after outputing the Final Answer.

The following are 3 examples:

Question: Here are some premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
Here is a conclusion:
Miroslav Venhoda loved music.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: There is no information confirming that Venhoda specifically belongs to that subset of music-loving musicians.
Step 2: Venhoda's personal feelings toward music cannot be logically proven from these statements alone.
Final Answer: \boxed{Uncertain} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All people who regularly drink coffee are dependent on caffeine.
People regularly drink coffee, or they don't want to be addicted to caffeine, or both.
No one who doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is unaware that caffeine is a drug, or she is not a student and is she aware that caffeine is a drug.
Rina is either a student who is dependent on caffeine, or she is not a student and not dependent on caffeine.
Here is a conclusion:
Rina eith doesn't want to be addicted to caffeine or is unaware that caffeine is a drug.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: If Rina is a student, the premises force her to be unaware that caffeine is a drug, which already satisfies the conclusion.
Step 2: If she is not a student, the premises instead force her to not want to be addicted to caffeine, which also satisfies the conclusion.
Step 3: Since in every logically possible case at least one part of the conclusion holds, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
Final Answer: \boxed{True} ####

Question: Here are some premises:
All eels are fish.
No fish are plants.
Everything displayed in the collection is either a plant or an animal.
All multicellular animals are not bacteria.
All animals displayed in the collection are multicellular.
A sea eel is displayed in the collection.
The sea eel is an eel or an animal or not a plant.
Here is a conclusion:
The sea eel is bacteria.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:
Step 1: All eels are fish, and no fish are plants, which implies that the sea eel is not a plant.
Step 2: Since everything in the collection must be either a plant or an animal, and the sea eel is not a plant, it must be an animal.
Step 3: All animals in the collection are multicellular and that all multicellular animals are not bacteria, so the sea eel cannot be bacteria.
Final Answer: \boxed{False} ####

Ensure that your response strictly follows the format to maintain clarity and consistency.
Question: Here are some premises:
No digital media are analog.
Every printed text is analog media.
All streaming services are digital media.
If an object is a hardcover book, then it is printed text.
If 1984 is a streaming service, then 1984 is a hardcover book.
Here is a conclusion:
1984 is a streaming service.
Based on the premises, is the conclusion True, False, or Uncertain?
Response:

Output: False